EPISODE 511: BIDEN ADMIN. GIVES WIFE OF D.C. U.S. ATTORNEY ALL ACCESS PASS TO WHITE HOUSE
On today’s must see episode of Human Events with Jack Posobiec, the box office battle between Indiana Jones and The Sound of Freedom is broken down by the numbers. Poso is also joined by Mike Davis where they dive deep into the latest out of the California RNC. Jack is also joined by the great Julie Kelly herself where they discuss a scandalous development from the Biden Admin. where apparently the wife of a DC US Attorney was given an all access pass to the White House, all this and more on ...
We are in the fight for America's future and we are assembling a team to fight back.
Turning point action this July 15th and 16th is where the assemblage will take place.
Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, Dan Bongino, Steve Bannon, myself, Charlie Kirk, Senator Hawley, Senator Vance, Matt Gaetz, Benny Johnson, Vivek Ramaswamy, Scott Pressler, Mike Lindell, Harmeet Dhillon, You need to be there.
Go and sign up immediately.
TPaction.com is the site.
TPaction.com.
Use promo code POSO and you will get a discount.
Secure your tickets immediately.
Don't be coming to me saying, can you get me in after this thing sells out because it will sell out fast.
And I will see you down in Florida this July 15th and 16th for the greatest assemblage of patriots this country has seen since Valley Forge.
We are in a fifth generational conflict.
We are in a fifth season.
Yeah.
For every lie they tell, we're gonna get in their face and yell two truths.
This is Human Events with your host, Jack Posobiec.
Christ is King!
Yevgeny Prigozhin is back in Russia, in St.
Petersburg, instead of being in exile in Belarus.
The majority of Republican primary voters right now say they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who supports funding Ukraine's War effort, key agencies, officials from the Biden administration now barred from meeting and communicating with social media companies about content on their platform.
I think it's safe to say the administration will eventually appeal this.
So we are regularly making sure social media platforms are aware of the latest narratives dangerous to public health.
I do think that he should consider structural reform of the court.
And you know, I knew that Joe would always be the education president.
Well, I hate to say that I think she may be the only person who believes that.
In the last couple of weeks, we've had a trans activist burying her breasts.
We find coke.
It's like they're running a low-rent strip club.
President Trump has millions of small donors that invest in him.
They maybe aren't rich people, they aren't big donors, but they go out there and they use their hard-earned money to get a leader elected.
Ladies and gentlemen, welcome aboard today's edition of Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Today is July 6, 2023.
Did you know today is the one-year anniversary of the destruction of the Georgia Guidestones?
I'm not sure what happened to those Guidestones.
I guess we'll never know.
Play the Unsolved Mysteries music.
I'm just kidding.
We don't actually have the music, but we do have Fantastic news and I have to thank every single person in this audience, every single person within the sound of my voice who chipped in, who stood up, who stood strong, and even if it was a comment, if it was an email to us, or even just a retweet,
The Sound of Freedom hit the number one movie, number one movie in America on the 4th of July.
We said that when this movie came out, that it would shock the world.
And let me tell you something, all those YouTubers, all those people with their access journalism, you get, Oh, I went to the sneak preview into the sneak screening, Indiana Jones.
They're all talking about it.
They're all saying how good it is.
They won't say a word about this.
They won't say a word about the fact That this film, The Sound of Freedom, beats Indiana Jones at the box office, beat Disney, despite the fact that it's on half the screens.
That's right.
It's on about 2,500 screens to about 4,600 screens.
That means the per theater average, okay, if you want to understand how the business works, the per theater average of Sound of Freedom was double, double that of Disney, double that of Mickey Mouse, double that of Kathleen Kennedy.
Kathleen Kennedy, more like Kathleen Cantody.
Look, this film has ignited a wildfire.
It started with, of course, believers, conservative shows, outlets like Human Events, our work on independent media.
It's gone beyond that.
This is actually becoming a court of force.
This is, and I believe this film is a watershed moment for this issue, for our world.
My parents, during the show yesterday, when we were on here, We were doing human events.
My parents were actually at the theater watching this film.
This is about standing up to Hollywood.
This is about standing up to the mainstream media.
This is about showing that we can do this.
And there's nothing you can do to stop us.
There's nothing you can do to stop this film.
And the pedophiles are seething right now that this film is out there.
The pedophiles are seething that this film is the number one in America.
Hollywood sat on this film for five years.
Disney had the rights to this.
When Disney bought Fox Studios, Disney had the rights to this film.
Disney.
Why didn't you want to put out an anti-pedophile movie, Disney?
I have a question.
I have a little question for Bobby Iger, for all the folks over there.
You could have put it out under Fox Searchlight.
You could have done what you do.
But why didn't you want to put out a movie that was anti-pedophile, Disney?
Did you have a problem with that message?
Did Disney not want to get behind an anti-pedophile movie?
Why is that?
I have a lot of questions.
And let me tell you something, when I have questions, I get answers.
And now we've got an entire army of people across the country and is now moving across the world.
God's timing is always perfect.
That's all I have to say.
God's timing is always perfect.
The movie came out when it was meant to.
Folks, we've got Mike Davis coming on next.
We've got Julie Kelly with a huge scoop coming up for us later in the show.
You need to stick around for this.
And also a special message about Turning Point Action.
We're going to reveal some news and name some names about what's going on, who's appearing, who's not appearing.
Stay tuned as Human Events continues.
I'm always listening to Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright guys, Jack Kasubic, we're back, Human Events.
Now, I gotta tell you, if I seem a little bit extra, I don't know, energized today, if I seem a little more upbeat, if I seem like I'm a little bit going a bit stronger, that's because what graced my coffee mug this morning was my very first scoop, believe it or not, of Pitch Black Espresso Dark Roast from Blackout Coffee.
And I gotta tell you something, I'm flying right now.
I'm flying on the pitch back.
Because this stuff really kicks you into high gear.
We were rocking the 1776 before.
We're being patriotic.
We're going with the patriotic blend, the 1776 Dark Roast.
But today, day one of Pitch Black.
I think it's going to be Pitch Black all week.
This stuff is hardcore.
So some people like their coffee a little smoother in the morning, like to ease into their morning.
You know me, I hit the ground running and that's how you can too with blackoutcoffee.com.
Especially if you got a job, you got to get up early.
You got to get moving.
I get it.
I know what it's like.
You got to work long shifts or if you got a job, you got to work overnights.
You got to stay up.
I was in the Navy drinking bug juice.
I know exactly how that goes when you're on ship.
Blackout coffee got you.
So just go to BlackoutCoffee.com.
Use promo code POSO20.
POSO20.
Why is there 20?
20% off your first order.
BlackoutCoffee.com.
Trust me, you're going to love this stuff as much as I do.
Now, I want to bring on Mike Davis from the Article 3 Project because we have to ask this question about what's happening with the delegate apportionment in California, some of these other situations, because Okay, Richard Barrison yesterday who was walking us through how there's been this huge debate raging about this new system or potential new system of reapportionment of delegates when it comes to the California primary.
Is it going to be winner-take-all?
Is it going to be Mike, thanks for joining us.
Are there going to be thresholds, no thresholds?
Well, there was an email that went out last night after our show to every single member of the California GOP.
And I'd like to bring Mike Davis on now to explain what the situation is.
Mike, thanks for joining us.
Thank you for having me, Jack.
So, Mike, walk us through.
We know there's been this question of California is now changing there, or it has been changed right by Gavin Newsom, has moved up California's primary date.
That triggers a requirement that they must comply with RNC guidelines for primaries that are held before March 15th.
However, there's a question as to how the actual new rule will be written.
What is the latest update as of last evening?
Well, Harmeet Dhillon is one of my friends and strong allies with Article 3 Project and Internet Accountability Project.
I've worked with Harmeet for years.
She is a loyal Trump supporter.
Her law firm represents the Trump campaign.
She's been a warrior for Trump for many years.
What happened with this RNC meeting is They're trying to comply with the update.
Because, as you said, Jack, because they moved their primary before March 15th, they have to go from a winner-take-all system to a proportional system.
But there was some confusion with that, where you can still have carve-outs.
For example, if a candidate gets 50% or more of the vote, they can get a winner-take-all.
or if there are candidates who don't get 20%, they don't get any delegates.
And so the- - And these are the thresholds.
This is the idea of like a 50% or a 20% because we were digging into this, Texas, Florida, some of the other states, 50%, 20% seems to be kind of a standard that we're seeing in sites that fall into this rule. - Correct, and that's what Harmeet's been advocating for.
She's been advocating to have a threshold of 50% winner take all and along with that 20% threshold, This is not being resolved.
This is simply a proposal.
And this is a proposal that was going to the Executive Committee, then it has to go to the Rules Committee, and then it has to go to the full convention.
And so, this is not set in stone.
It sounds like, based upon Harmeet's email, That what she's been advocating for, she's going to push for that, and it sounds like she's going to get other members of the committee, the California Republican National Committee Board, to go along with what she's been advocating for.
My biggest concern has been for people attacking Harmeet.
Harmeet is a Trump loyalist.
She's a conservative warrior.
She has been for years.
There's no malice here.
Harmeet is Trying to balance where she's representing, her firm is representing the Trump campaign and she has a fiduciary duty as the National Committee woman in California to make sure that the will of California voters is followed here.
And she's threading the needle and she's doing that.
So I think people just need to, they need to, I think that before they criticize Harmeet, I would suggest that they read her email and actually pick up the phone and call her.
Well, so here's my question then.
Because I read the email.
I read through it last night when it came out.
I think Laura Loomer had posted it.
I saw all four pages.
Very interesting.
And in that, there was this discussion of Sort of, you know, this idea that there was an artificial timeline that said the rule change had to be in by June, which would be months before the next meeting of the California GOP, where this could actually be debated with the entire committee there present, as opposed to pushing it through in June.
And then there was this question of you needed some sort of temporary rule that had to be pushed in, and that's what went for it.
What's going on right there?
Can you break any of that down for us?
That's a very good question, and I think that there was some misinformation communicated to Harmeet on when things needed to happen in the process, and she pushed back on that, and her email kind of gets Gets to that.
The bottom line is that Harmeet's position that there's going to be a 50% threshold for winner-take-all, and then there's going to be the 20% threshold.
She's pushing for that.
It sounds like she's convincing other members to go along with that, and it sounds like that's what's going to be the California position when this is all said and done, or at least that's what Harmeet is advocating for.
So, again, I think people need to cool off on attacking Harmeet and questioning her motives and her loyalty, because it's not fair to Harmeet, who has spent many, many, many years fighting these conservative fights for Donald Trump.
She has the scars to prove it.
She's volunteered thousands of hours of her very valuable time to do this.
And people should take a step back and actually read her email.
And if they have questions still, These self-proclaimed journalists should actually do what journalists do, and that's reach out to her and ask her these questions before they smear her.
Well, and I remember, and of course I remember Harmeet publicly advocating for President Trump throughout 2020 and also in the aftermath of 2020 when many lawyers ran away from President Trump at that time period.
But there's another question here as well that I have is that Harmeet Dhillon, she's not the California GOP chair, that was in Richard Barris was on yesterday, and I think you rightfully pointed out that it's this Jessica Patterson who's actually, obviously Harmeet is more well-known, but Jessica Patterson actually is the chairwoman of the party there and Barris said that it's really this Patterson that was pushing that rule change that also seemed to be what Harmeet was saying in the letter that we saw last night.
It sounds like that's the case, and that's my point.
Look, I actually agree with those who are raising the flag here and saying that this is not right, what they're doing in California.
I agree with that.
Where my disagreement is, is the people who are unfairly attacking Harmeet, when she also agrees with us.
And that she's been advocating this, including within these meetings.
And she's the one who's going to actually make this happen if it happens.
And she's doing it over opposition from other people on this California GOP board.
And so I think people need to understand that Harmeet is not the enemy.
She's not a Trojan horse.
You know, her firm's representing Donald Trump.
She's not a Trojan horse undermining Donald Trump to the benefit of some other candidate.
That's just an insane conspiracy theory.
And that's why I decided over the 4th of July weekend to spend my weekend defending Harmeet Dillon.
That's right.
And this really did pop out of nowhere.
But I do think I do think it's important because I remember this and look, I'll take it on on the head because look, you know, I'm already in the January 6th report and all these other reports that mention it.
It's it's It comes down to this when they talk about hashtag stop the steal.
And that, which was a social media campaign.
I'm sorry, Jack Smith.
I'm sorry, Joe Biden.
I'm sorry, Nancy Pelosi.
It was a social media campaign.
It was a hashtag that we ran in 2020.
Hashtag StopTheSteal.
You know why we used it?
Because it's a good hashtag.
It's catchy.
That the original, original use, and by the way, nobody asked me to tweet this.
They said, Jack, why did you tweet StopTheSteal in September of 2020?
It's because I felt like it.
You know why?
Because it's a meme.
And why did I post it?
Because I like memes.
that i kid you not man they were digging someone asked jack pasovic from the white house between the very original stop the steal all the way back was not 2018 which by the way you did see a lot of people come in on behalf of ron de santis in broward county in 2018 november um was not that it
It was all the way back at the delegate convention situation, the rules committee of the RNC, the convention in Cleveland in 2016.
That was the original stop this deal, which was all about that.
Last minute on this, Mike Dave.
Yeah, I mean, I would just, I appreciate what you're doing to get information out there on this, Jack.
There's a lot of confusion.
I would say that this is going to get sorted out.
Harmeet's going to ensure this gets sorted out.
And again, people should, people should call Harmeet before they accuse her of being disloyal or otherwise question her motives.
No, and I think that, look, I'll put it this way.
I think people are right to ask questions.
I think that people are right to raise flags about the process, about the system, the personalities involved, but at the same time, that's what we do here, and that's why I've been working the phones, that's why I was calling people and Both sides of this thing saying, what is the truth?
What is actually going on in California?
Mike, can we hold you on because I want to ask you about some other stuff coming up after the break here.
But I do think that it's so important for us to understand what's happening because people are rightfully concerned.
Will the RNC turn into, as Richard Barris said, going for the superdelegate system?
Could we potentially be pushing on the right to say this is what turns people off from party politics?
And so the idea then of keeping the system set up the way the elected members of the party, the voters of the party, ultimately being able to decide, that's what I think people want and you need to use your power to make sure that stays the way.
Coming up next, more Radio Video.
All right, Mike Davis, I want to do something a little different here on the show.
So next week, we've got Turning Point Action, ActCon, the ActCon action conference that's coming up down in West Palm Beach.
And Charlie Kirk just did something that I've never seen him do before.
He put out a list.
Because whenever there's a turning point event, people say, who's speaking?
Who's not speaking?
Who's doing this?
Who's doing that?
The media goes back and forth.
They say, this person was there.
This person's not there.
What rank are they on the seating chart?
Whenever the announcement goes through.
He just put out a list of candidates for president that will be arriving that have declined to attend and the people who are still TBD.
So let me go through the list with you really quickly here.
Donald J. Trump, confirmed.
Vivek Ramaswamy, confirmed.
Francis Suarez, who is the mayor of Miami, confirmed.
However, declined, declined, declined.
Mike Pence, Tim Scott, Nikki Haley, all declined.
Chris Christie, TBD, no response.
Asa Hutchinson, TBD, no response.
Doug Burgum, TBD, no response.
Larry Elder, TBD, no response.
Ron DeSantis, TBD.
So it seems like, and I haven't spoken to Charlie about this otherwise, it seems like they have talked with DeSantis.
Obviously the event is in Florida.
Ron DeSantis, I remember, Spoke at multiple Turning Point Action events throughout 2022.
However, it appears he is not a confirmed speaker for the Turning Point Action Conference, which will be happening next week in West Palm Beach.
6,000 people will be there.
It's obviously a very strong grassroots event.
Tucker, Steve Bannon, myself, etc.
Dan Bongino.
I mean, this is the place to be.
What do you think it says about these candidates either not showing up or not giving a response?
Did you say it was in Florida?
That's right, unless there's another West Palm Beach you know of.
So it's in Florida.
Maybe the governor of Florida could show up.
If you don't have a governor of Florida, maybe you could invite the acting governor of Florida.
It's a head-scratcher to me that DeSantis wouldn't show up to this event, but maybe he doesn't think it's important to go talk to young conservative leaders from all over the country.
Yeah, it's strange to me as well because, I'll put it this way, you know, and Charlie has said publicly that he's backing Trump personally because he had made a long-standing promise to Trump, but that being said, a group like Turning Point Action has always tried to sort of
Keep that balance between all the different angles out there when it comes down to it, and to say, basically, look, if there's an event that's going on, obviously, from a perspective, just a pure events promotion perspective, you want as many people there as possible.
Because you want to generate that buzz, you want to generate that spirit of competition, you want to see what it's like, you know, who gets cheered, who gets booed, who gets the applause lines, that type of thing, and then maybe hold a straw poll.
So the idea, because this is how, I mean, really, this is what put CPAC on the map, which was the idea that every candidate had to go through CPAC, and then they had the CPAC straw poll.
I would say used to be, and in many cases still is, one of the big standards onto going and winning the GOP nomination.
Now, obviously this year it's a little bit different because we don't have an incumbent, but we do have a former president and immediate former president running.
And so it kind of functions like an incumbent.
Yeah, I mean, it's very interesting.
I think Governor DeSantis has been an outstanding governor, but I've just been very underwhelmed With DeSantis' presidential campaign, and if Vivek is going to this event and Governor DeSantis is not, then it's hard for me to understand why the DeSantis people are finding it puzzling that Vivek is becoming a quick competitor for the number two slot in the Republican primary.
I think this is a big mistake by DeSantis for not RSVPing to this event in his home state where he is the governor.
With these key conservative influencers from all over the country, especially young people.
And to be clear, by the way, Governor DeSantis spoke at the event last year.
This isn't like an event that he's not... We had it in Tampa last year, not in West Palm, but it's essentially the same event with Turning Point Action that he spoke at last year.
President Trump also spoke.
I remember his speech.
I was in the room.
He got a ton of applause there.
I would think that he would again if he showed up.
And I guess the question then becomes, you know, And I just gotta say it, alright?
I'm gonna say it.
One of the reasons that Vivek Ramaswamy is now, and if you saw the Echelon Insights poll that came out yesterday, which is an A, you know, A, A-rated poll, that Vivek is now within striking distance of number two nationwide is because he's not campaigning as an anti-Trump candidate.
In some instances, it seems like he's actually campaigning as also MAGA, but then willing to talk about things from a new perspective, be more innovative about different issues, but he's not.
I'll put it this way, he's not disrespecting MAGA voters, he's not attacking MAGA voters or the MAGA candidate, he's attacking everybody else.
He showed up down there in Florida for the classified Mar-a-Lago case, right, this question about the classified documents that you and I have talked about at great length, and I think that has won him points.
We had you on that day when President Trump was indicted, but Vivek Ramaswamy was the only candidate who was down there And I have to say, I think MAGA voters are taking notice of it.
Yeah, I mean, I am very impressed with him and I'm a huge Trump supporter.
I'm definitely supporting Trump for president.
I've always supported Trump for president.
I think Governor DeSantis is an outstanding governor.
I think he's our best governor.
It's just a head scratcher.
To me that he's running such a bad presidential campaign.
And when I see Vivek quickly going into the number two position, I think maybe the DeSantis team may need to regroup and think maybe we made a mistake by jumping in against Trump this time.
He's not even going to be 50 years old.
I guess he'll be he'll just turn 50 when 2028 rolls around.
I think Governor DeSantis maybe should cut his losses and drop out, endorse Trump and Save himself for 2028.
Well, I think a lot of people have looked at that as well because, and look, I've said this on this show all the time.
I've said it on Tim Pool when I do media appearances.
I always say, I always say that everybody wants to argue with me about four years, right?
We know there's a four-year term that's coming up for president, right?
That's every presidential term is four years, your term of liberty too.
Everybody gets it.
If there were a way for a deal to be struck between the two camps where you work in tandem, then you don't need to talk about four years.
You can put together a plan for 12 years.
Now I was saying that at the onset of this, obviously there's a bit more bad blood right now than there was at the time, but I do think when you look in terms of the movement, we look in terms of the party, when you look in terms of the country, which is obviously what we're hoping to be able to Yeah, I mean, that's just it.
I think, like I said, I think Governor DeSantis is the best governor in America.
I think he got into the presidential politics too soon.
probably a little bit more effective than a four year plan that we're all squabbling over. - Yeah, I mean, that's just it.
I think, like I said, I think Governor DeSantis is the best governor in America.
He's, I think he, I think he just, I think he got into the presidential politics too soon, he's not ready.
It's very clear he's not ready by his very underwhelming presidential campaign.
I think he can salvage his reputation among conservatives, particularly Trump conservatives, by finding a way to gracefully bow out, endorse Trump, and save himself for 2028.
Well, and this is why, and as we were talking about in the previous segment, this is why the delegate apportionment matters.
Because if you have delegates that are then being apportioned in different ways, when you go through some of these early states, it actually extends what seems to be a very contentious primary, which would extend it far beyond what the level that it normally would have.
So instead of this thing being done by the end of February, Super Tuesday, it now rolls into March.
Then it rolls into April.
Now you're getting closer to the convention.
All of this being done in a presidential cycle, which we have to face facts.
We are only, what, 14 months away from the election?
14, 15 months away from the election or something?
It's not that long away.
So the longer people keep this fight up, The more money is spent, the more energy is spent.
I think this is why these, and it may sound arcane, you know, the threshold of the 20%, the 50%, but it actually matters because you and I, I'm sure, can see the media writing on the wall.
And the other piece, before I let you go, I want to ask you about this.
There's this question as well of the 14th Amendment.
If President Trump is indicted, and probably will be for January 6th, If he's convicted by a D.C.
court, which if they hold the trial quickly, I can't imagine that a D.C.
court will let him off.
Do you believe that a fight for the 14th Amendment then for President Trump, does that go all the way up to the Supreme Court?
And what happens then?
I know it's a quick question.
We only have a couple of minutes, but I want to get your just your quick thoughts on it.
If Democrats and D.C.
Republicans and other Trump deranged rhinos think that they are going to overturn the will of the American people through some novel reading of the 14th Amendment with this bogus January 6th insurrection theory, that is absolutely not going to fly with the American people.
So therefore, it's not going to fly at the Supreme Court.
Now, what do you think?
Are we looking at another 6-3?
Do you think 5-4?
Do you think anyone peels off?
I mean, I'm not asking you to read the tea leaves, but hey, come on, that's your job.
I mean, it should be 9-0, but you see with these three Democrat Supreme Court justices, they're just mindless partisans, and so if Trump is before them, they're going to vote against Trump mindlessly.
It doesn't matter.
It should be 9-0.
It will be 6-3.
Well, unfortunately, I think you're right.
But I have to ask you, and final minute on this, is it the role of the Supreme Court to determine who is able to run for president in America under our system?
No, not at all.
The qualifications are in the Constitution.
This insurrection theory, both in Georgia and D.C., is a bogus legal theory.
It is not insurrection.
It is actually allowed by the Electoral Count Act.
Mike Davis in a nutshell.
Everyone, go file Mike Davis the Article 3 project.
He's been calling the shots on this and calling balls and strikes from the very start.
Thank you, Mike.
illegal to object to presidential elections and third world Marxist hell holes.
And that seems like that's where the Democrats are trying to take America because they hate our country and they're trying to destroy it.
Mike Davis, in a nutshell, everyone go file Mike Davis, the Article 3 project.
He's been calling the shots on this and calling balls and strikes from the very start.
Thank you, Mike.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you, Jack.
Okay.
All right, folks, we've got Julie Kelly up next, because as we look on all of this, we've got to ask her about that very same question.
We're talking about the 2024 primary.
What will come next?
What is the next shoe to drop?
And I'm telling you, she was the one who called it first before anyone else.
Come back next, Human Events.
Buzzing in my ear about the boring people at your office.
I'm trying to listen to the new Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
All right, we are back here at Human Events, very excited to bring on Julie Kelly, who's got a huge scoop for us up on her sub stack.
The wife of the D.C.
U.S.
Attorney has an all-access White House pass.
Julie Kelly, what's going on here?
Because I was told every time we hear from Joe Biden that the Department of Justice is completely independent of the White House, there's no collusion, there's no He doesn't even know where the Department of Justice is.
He doesn't even remember who the Attorney General is, which honestly might be true, but probably for other reasons.
Why is it that the wife of the D.C.
U.S.
Attorney has an all-access White House pass?
Can you walk us through this, please?
Such a good question.
So one would have to assume that Fatima Goss Graves, who also is the CEO and president of a very well-funded $100 million nonprofit called the National Women's Law Center, Um, why she has visited the white house now on record 28 times since Joe Biden was elected, uh, or became president.
Her invitation to the white house, uh, increased exponentially.
As I write in my piece on my sub stack, declassified with Julie Kelly after her husband, Matthew graves, uh, was confirmed by the Senate in November, 2021.
She has attended high level events with the president with Dr. Jill.
With Kamala Harris.
She has met at least on three occasions with one of Kamala Harris's top advisors.
Kamala Harris's niece, Mina, is on the board of directors for Fatima Goss Graves' nonprofit.
So you could see the swampy aspect of this.
But why is Fatima Goss Graves, when her husband is the lead prosecutor, continuing to round up Trump supporters for a four-hour disturbance that occurred two and a half years ago, criminally charging them Criminally charging people like Steve Bannon.
Why is his wife now visited the White House on average once a month since the beginning of Biden's presidency?
So I pose those questions in my piece on my sub stack and suggest that House Republicans who now want to talk to Matt Graves after the IRS whistleblower said that he declined to decline to prosecute Hunter Biden for tax crimes committed in 2014 and 2015 in Washington, D.C.
According to that IRS whistleblower, Matthew Graves made that decision in March of 2022.
That month, according to White House visitor logs, his wife visited the White House five times.
Is she discussing this criminal investigation with anyone at the White House?
Is this is a quid pro quo, a way to reward Matthew Graves for continuing to round up and criminally charge Trump supporters and Trump advisors?
I think if Matthew Graves sits before House Uh, committee as Republicans want, they should also ask him those questions.
Well, I think that's exactly right.
And this is something where House Republicans clearly have the ability to come in and put pressure and just shine a light on what exactly is going on in this situation.
Because, Julie, and as you've reported, we were told again and again that Matthew Graves is completely independent, that the Department of Justice is completely independent.
All of these investigations, whether it be Hunter Biden, whether it be Donald Trump, which of course is going to come up in Jack Smith, I'm going to ask you about that in a minute.
And of course, the January 6th defendants and detainees, all of this being done by someone whose wife is making 28 visits to the White House with a full access pass.
Look, you know, my wife's been to the White House.
She was there when Trump was there, but she wasn't going 28 times.
When she was going, she was going with me to public events or official events.
It wasn't like she was just going and That's right, and Fatima Goss Graves has attended, as I said, events hosted by Joe Biden.
said as well, that when she's going in, she's not going there for not always going for events like this.
These are going for specific meetings with members of the administration.
That's right.
And Fatima Goss-Graves has attended, as I said, events hosted by Joe Biden.
In fact, one of them, Jack, that I write about in my piece is she attended what looks like it looks like she attended.
It was the only public event on Joe Biden's schedule, January 6, 2023.
Joe Biden's commemorating the two-year anniversary of what happened on January 6th.
He gave away more medals, the Presidential Citizens Medal, to what I call the January 6th celebrity cops, people like Michael Fanone, the cop-turned-CNN contributor, Harry Dunn, Equilina Gonell, Daniel Hodges, people who not only are central to promoting the narrative about January 6th, but people, individuals Who Fatima Goss Graves' husband, Matthew, uses as prep in, say, sentencing hearings.
He has allowed these very same police officers to give victim impact statements demanding harsh prison sentences for anyone convicted or pleading guilty to attacking police officers.
So why is she sitting in the audience for an event on the subject matter that her husband is responsible for?
Um, you know, this is the sort of thing that regardless of where you are on the political spectrum, that sort of pro quo, that sort of tight connection between what is supposed to be an independent department of justice and the top officials in the White House, including the president himself.
Um, those are, uh, you know, sort of alarming revelations, I think.
And it's sort of stunning that the media hasn't found this out themselves.
But I was the one to just glance at the White House Visitor's Log and shockingly saw her name at least two dozen times.
You know, Julie, I made that same comment to somebody earlier today.
We were going through some of these questions earlier in the show about the RNC and the delegate apportionment process and some of the personalities involved and who ran for what at different times and some of the fault lines there and the personalities.
And it really goes to what you just said there that Don't you think that in a normal world, in a sane world, wouldn't the Washington Post be all over this kind of stuff?
Wouldn't this be the kind of thing that they're actually supposed to be doing on a regular basis instead of doxing Trump supporters and harassing people?
This is the sort of actual political peeling back the layers of examining corruption, examining what our government is up to on a regular basis, that you wonder why does it fall to, I mean, Don't get me wrong.
I mean, I'm very glad, you know, it gives me something to do because I'm not really sure what I'd be talking about otherwise.
But doesn't it blow your mind that there's no one else out there talking about it?
Meanwhile, you've got guys like Ryan Reilly who go all in with sedition hunters and now gets rewarded with a job on NBC.
Right.
And I mean, there's no doubt that these January 6th reporters know who Fatima Goss Graves is.
They certainly have to understand her access to the White House.
I even report that it looks like both Fatima and Matthew Graves attended the Biden's Fourth of July barbecue at the White House last year.
I mean, this is, at the very least, should be something that the press should be exposing as flying in the face of both the insistence by Joe Biden and certainly by Merrick Garland.
That his Department of Justice is independent from influence in the White House.
And this is proof positive that that simply is untrue.
And I'll tell you, since my story posted yesterday, I have heard cricket from January 6th corporate reporters who certainly cover my work and know this and should be alarmed that the lead federal prosecutor, a Biden appointee, that his wife has such access and influence Within the White House and what information she might be sending them, what information she might be getting and passing along to her husband.
Now, of course, this is all speculation.
But look, when you're talking about the most corrupt Department of Justice in history, when you're talking about unprecedented charges, FBI raids of a former president, bringing criminal charges on ridiculous counts such as the Espionage Act and keeping all of this under seal, by the way, There is no one in this Department of Justice or White House who should be trusted.
And one man who should be questioned is right there, Merrick Garland, Lisa Monaco, his deputy, and certainly Matthew Graves, about his apparent conduit between him and the Biden White House.
No, I think you're absolutely right.
This is the same type of revolving door, the same type of personal relationships leveraged into political opportunism, and in some cases, lawfare, as we saw back during the Obama administration.
And you know who it reminds me of?
Bruce Orr and Nellie Orr, one had a relationship who was in government, one had a relationship that was outside of government but was also tied to politics.
Isn't it, it's the same, and Julie, you were one of the few, the people who just dug in on it and exposed The way they were able to use this relationship as a go-between for various entities and various interests.
Oh, I'm not working with the Department of Justice.
We don't work with the DNC.
Oh, I work with the DNC.
We don't work with the Department of Justice.
We're not colluding.
Yeah, but you're married!
You're married!
We can see you're clearly working together.
You're clearly talking to each other.
It's ridiculous.
Julie, we're coming to a break.
Can I hold you over because I need to go through more of this because I think you're on to it.
This is how DC works.
It's how they've always been running this stuff.
It's been working this way for a long time.
But fortunately, we've got folks like the intrepid Julie Kelly to break it down for all of us.
When I grew up in the hood, I rolled with Bloods.
And them boys had a saying.
You can't be listening to all that slappy-whack-trematozal-it's-a-bam-ship-nippy-bam-bam like Human Events with Jack Posobiec.
Alright, back to events.
Jack Posobiec, here we go, guys.
So, Julie Kelly, when we were in here last, we were just talking about how the Oars and now the Graves, this DC power couple, right, seems to be working on the left.
But there's another DC power couple that's been involved in lawfare, and that's Jack Smith and his wife, isn't it?
Tell me about Jack Smith and his wife.
So Jack Smith is the special counsel who was appointed by Merrick Garland in November of 2022 to give the fake impression that the DOJ was going to be independent related to the investigations into Donald Trump for classified documents and the events of January 6th.
Jack Smith has a spotty, to put it kindly, prosecutorial record.
I think he was overturned twice by the Supreme Court.
He had mistrials and other political cases.
Nonetheless, his wife, Kate, Was one of the producers on the documentary for Michelle Obama.
It is reported that she also donated to Democrats, I believe even Joe Biden.
So here once again, we have a Democratic power couple put in a huge position of unaccountable authority, by the way, especially Jack Smith, seeing him right there.
And so, you know, again, you know, I think Washington DC is not so much a swamp as it is a trailer park because it just seems like, you know, they swap out partners and swap out, uh, offices and swap out, you know, all sorts of, uh, interesting locations and partnership.
Uh, especially when it comes to the department of justice, as you pointed out personally, or both tied to Glenn Simpson at fusion GPS.
And of course their good friend, Christopher Steele.
Well, and so Julie, here's what I've got to ask you as well.
Number one, okay, was this Fatima Graves, was she the drug dealer that happened to leave that cocaine in the library?
Yes or no?
What do we think?
I'm gonna say no.
She does not seem like the sort.
To me, although, I wouldn't be surprised if the Bidens threw her under the bus or anyone to protect, you know, the very likely culprit, the owner of that cocaine.
Oh, come on.
We all know that Hunter just goes in the library to brush up on his Roosevelt, the Rough Rider, Spanish-American War.
That's what he was doing in the library.
But Julie, in all seriousness, there are a lot of updates going on in the Jack Smith case, or potentially cases against Trump.
You've been consistently ahead of the mainstream media.
Because I go to Drudge Report To see what the left is talking about and all of a sudden they have this big breaking alarm headline, superseding indictment, Donald Trump.
They're looking at January 6th and say, wait a minute, Julie Kelly was on the show weeks ago and that's exactly what she said.
You need to be listening to human events and need to be following Julie Kelly on Substack.
So break down, what is the latest on the superseding indictment and the new redactions or unredactions in the classified intel case?
So a couple of things happening in this case.
The judge magistrate judge who, by the way, was the one who signed off on the search warrant, which resulted in the raid of Mar-a-Lago last August.
He has allowed for some redactions to be or some of the redactions to be unsealed in that extremely lengthy, highly redacted affidavit that was filed for the search warrant.
And this is in response to The Press Coalition, which is a group of major news organizations who have been filing motions in both this case and also many January 6 cases, wanting some of these sealed orders and some of these sealed hearings to be made public.
So this was in response.
It was only a partial redaction.
So that's happening.
Also, Judge Cannon, Aileen Cannon, the Trump appointed judge who did authorize the appointment of a special master in this case because she does not trust the Department of Justice.
She authorized a special master in this case last September.
Unfortunately, her order was overturned on appeal in December.
Nonetheless, she set a very tight trial schedule, hoping to bring this case, or at least that was her original plan, in August.
DOJ filed a motion asking to delay the trial until December.
Really based on the need for security clearances for both Trump and Walt Nata, the man who is charged with conspiring with Trump to obstruct justice, their need to get secured security clearances in the next 45 to 60 days.
But Jack, the superseding indictment, and I've watched this over and over in January 6 cases, Jack Smith very likely will file what's called a superseding indictment And that will either add charges and or add co-defendants in the sitting in the existing criminal indictment, 37 count felony indictment against Donald Trump.
That will further delay the trial into 2024, which is what Jack Smith and the Department of Justice wants.
On the flip side, we are still sitting here waiting For what will be an even bigger bombshell criminal indictment, a multi-count felony criminal indictment against Donald Trump for the events of January 6, alongside other co-defendants, probably some of his former attorneys, could be some of his aides, associates in the White House.
And that will be the biggest, pose the biggest legal hazard for Donald Trump, because one of those counts could be seditious conspiracy.
And when defendants have been charged with seditious conspiracy, the government, this DOJ, has sought pretrial detention for those accused of that crime, which is tantamount to treason.
Do you think they would actually seek, and I'll just be blunt, do you actually think that they would try to put Donald Trump behind bars if they charged him with this?
I actually do, because I've seen how this D.C., not just this Department of Justice, but I see how the judges on the D.C.
District Court I have handled these cases.
They have held Jack nonviolent defenders, nonviolent protesters behind bars for two years awaiting trial.
They do not care about the constitutional right of these Trump supporters and January 6th protesters.
You think all of a sudden the rules are not going to apply?
This is the whole point of creating this case law precedent.
This precedence for not only holding people behind bars on seditious conspiracy, but obstruction of an official proceeding.
That is definitely a felony count that will be brought against Donald Trump.
You now have precedent of judges denying release of nonviolent protesters accused of obstruction.
So this is the sort of thing that Jack Smith could prepare in a pretrial detention motion presented to one of these D.C.
District Court judges and citing numerous precedents, numerous cases.
Where judges have signed off on pretrial detention, meaning denying bail until the defendant can go to trial.
I would not put anything past this DOJ, Jack Smith, or certainly any judge on the D.C.
District Court.
The great Julie Kelly.
We're just about out of time in the show.
Go and follow Julie Kelly on Substack.
We want to pump those Substack numbers.
We're going to share the link down.
Julie, thank you so much for your time today here at Human Events.
Thanks, Jack.
Alright folks, we knocked it out of the park with Sound of Freedom.
Continue going to see that, but we need to keep fighting.
