THOUGHTCRIME Ep. 3 — AA Dead?, Georgia Soy Man, Bonus Holes, The Shopping Cart Test
In this latest THOUGHTCRIME featuring Jack Posobiec, Charlie Kirk, Andrew Kolvet, and Blake Neff, we react to the explosive Supreme Court decision on affirmative action, and explore other important questions like:-Why was a Georgia man sobbing over a crazy man being arrested?-What is a "bonus hole"?-What can shopping carts tell us about civilization?THOUGHTCRIME will stream LIVE exclusively on Rumble, every Thursday night at 8pm ET.Support the Show.
Joining us tonight is Jack Posobiec, Andrew Colvette, and Blake Neff.
Blake, you're famous now.
Congratulations.
of everyone.
They're collecting your communications.
Hello, everybody.
Welcome to episode three of Thought Crimes.
Joining us tonight is Jack Posobiec, Andrew Polvet, and Blake Neff.
Blake, you're famous now.
Congratulations.
There's no escaping it.
And I'm honored to be here, and I'm in a much better place than I was 48 hours ago, or I had some sort of Luciferian digestive attack for all of you that have dealt with some form of stomach flu.
That's That's a unique form of torture.
But I'm doing a lot better, and I just want to say how thankful I am for the Carly Kirk Show day team.
Same team, but specifically Andrew and Blake and all them who stepped up when I literally could not host yesterday.
Um, and it was great.
So thank you guys for that, and there's a lot of news to cover.
I want to say thank you for those of you watching on Rumble Chat.
We are going to engage with you throughout the evening.
Also, text this link to your friends.
We stream exclusively on Rumble, because they are the home of free speech, and we're able to say things here on Rumble that we're not able to say on other platforms.
You can also email us directly freedom at charliekirk.com as we proceed throughout the evening.
Affirmative action, 6-3 decision.
Blake, why don't you kick us off tonight?
All right, yes.
So we had, the decision came down today in Students for Fair Admissions versus Harvard, which has been worming its way through the federal court system seemingly since like the start of the Trump administration.
It's been going a long time.
And this was the case that was brought by a coalition of, it was a lot of like pro-Asian activists about the fact that Harvard has Like, very blatant anti-Asian discrimination, as well as anti-white discrimination in its admissions process.
And so the decision finally came down today.
It was a 6-3 decision written by Justice Roberts, where he said it was evaluating the admissions policies at Harvard and at the University of North Carolina.
And it found that both of them were just, it ruled that both of them were unconstitutional.
So it took us at least a step closer to actually declaring Affirmative action explicitly unconstitutional, although Roberts kind of pulls his punch where he says, well, you know, you can evaluate race as an individual matter.
And so Harvard has already come out saying like, oh, we're still going to use, we're going to use all of these essays to evaluate people and, you know, to tease out, you know, what their, what their race is.
They're already making plans about that, but it's still a big step forward, which you can tell just from how berserk Well, I mean, we talked about this on our show, and I'm curious about Jack's perspective here, but I give this like a C-minus.
Absolutely lose their minds at the prospect of affirmative action going away.
And same thing with a lot of people on Twitter.
So that's probably the best sign that today's decision was a very good one.
Andrew.
Well, I mean, I, you know, we talked about this on our show and I'm curious about Jack's perspective here, but I, I mean, I give this like a C minus.
I think Blake gave it a B minus and Charlie, you gave it a D.
It was actually surprising that Blake was the most positive on it.
I mean, I look at this and instantly I looked at Robert's squishy words here, and we predicted that they're just going to find another way to institute the racism regime into college admissions.
I mean, is it a better world that we're living in today than we were yesterday?
Is it a more fair world?
Yeah.
But it really could have been an opportunity for the Supreme Court to completely nuke Affirmative action.
And now Harvard's basically doing this.
If you could throw up, though, however, the 99.
It's an interesting, interesting graphic we have here because you see Harvard and Charlie, you had a tweet actually that went pretty viral today about Harvard and their email and how they're they're like, oh, we're so excited to comply with this because they knew there was a loophole for him.
But actually, if you read the part outlined in red, it says But despite the dissent's assertion to the contrary, universities may not simply establish through application essays or other means the regime we hold unlawful today.
A dissenting opinion is generally not the best source of legal advice on how to comply with the majority opinion.
What cannot be done directly cannot be done indirectly.
So it's actually in the decision, but we already know from What Harvard's putting out publicly that the universities are just going to find another way to do this and they're going to get it through the back door.
And we're just going to have to fight this again and again and again.
So I give it like a C minus.
Yeah, it's at least it's expressly illegal.
And to Blake's point, libs are freaking out, but it's still going to keep happening.
And we're just going to have to figure out how to, how to, it's like whack-a-mole.
You're going to have to keep like, you know, hitting the affirmative action mole as it comes through other channels.
The reason I rated it so highly is I'm black-pilled enough.
I was worried the Supreme Court was just going to say, actually, this is great.
They can keep doing it.
Your expectations were so low that you're actually pleasantly surprised.
Exactly.
To your point about how, you know, we have to fight this forever, like, the reason we're in this situation, uh, the reason we're having to evaluate this is, this went to the Supreme Court more than 40 years ago in, um, the Bakke decision in the University of California, where they were evaluating whether it was okay to have racial quotas, explicit racial quotas, where they just set, like, 15 seats aside for one race.
And the court said, quotas are bad, but, you know, you can still evaluate race for the sake of diversity.
And so then from that, that's like the entire source of the diversity industrial complex.
Like, no one was talking about diversity in the 1950s, the 1960s, or the 70s.
And then one Supreme Court justice gets won over by this diversity thing.
And then, you know, 40 years later, we have this massive diversity industrial complex where every company, every school, every agency has a chief diversity officer.
And so you can easily see how this bureaucracy could get pivoted over to, oh, now we have to We're going to have this massive essay-reading industrial complex to find how this person's experience with race is super individualized and adds a ton to their personality.
And, you know, they will fight very, very hard to preserve this.
And I think it's unfortunate that Justice Roberts backed off from just saying, like, you can't consider race in admissions.
He could have even gone whole hog and said, You just can't.
You can't even collect racial data.
You have to obscure racial data because our evidence shows that whenever you consider this, you start doing unconstitutional things.
And maybe we'll get that in a few more years, but I'm annoyed it didn't happen today.
Yeah, I'm with you on that, Blake, because we're in a situation now where, again, the same arguments that are being made aren't necessarily about, oh, we're just going to go back to race.
It's it's more they're they're having this very You know, blue pilled normie kind of argument as to say, when did white supremacy end in America?
Is it over now?
Did it end in the 1980s?
Did it end in the 1990s?
And when did the the white supremacists stop running the country?
That's essentially the framework that they're arguing in.
And that's just not true.
And it's never been true.
OK, this is a situation where people were were allowed to come into the schools.
These admit this mission process was done.
Through what?
Through merit.
So who scored better on the tests?
It was a very simple process.
But then they didn't get the classes that they wanted because years later, suddenly they started saying, no, we want to play social engineering and we want this class to look a certain way or we want that class to look a certain way.
And so they start putting it in.
So the issue that I see, and I see this with so many conservatives, even with their response to it, to say that, hey, we're You know, where the Dems are the real racist, the Dems are the real racist, when you're not sitting there and saying, no, actually, it had nothing to do with race to begin with.
And it's all about who is better, who are the best candidates for these schools, for these elite institutions.
And if you're not the right candidate, then you're not the right candidate.
Tough bricks, you know?
And I think, honestly, though, because you have a situation where, as Blake has said, You know, there's these essays and Harvard put out that letter earlier saying, Oh, we're going to accept the essays.
We're going to be doing the essays.
Fine.
Then you know what?
Then everybody out there, um, you know, just everyone out there, guess what?
You are now all black lesbians and you are now going to be writing your essay as the black lesbian.
And you're going to talk about your experience growing up as a black lesbian in America and how that has affected you and why going to Harvard would make your life so much better.
Yeah, so the question is, you know, how will this apply then at all to federal hiring practices?
Because people don't recognize or realize how widespread this affirmative action regime really is.
And the one I want to focus on, Jack, to kind of throw back to you, is the military.
I think that, does this decision open an opportunity for a complaint?
And is there affirmative action in the military?
I've heard conflicting, I mean, I think it's obviously in the military.
Let's say that it definitely isn't defense contracting in certain parts of the military.
Does this open an opportunity for a serious challenge next summer to go after the practice of affirmative action in federal hiring?
Well, I think that's right.
And so, uh, the military versus federal hiring, there's a number of different ways that you can be hired by the federal, um, the federal government outside of the military.
So typically if you're going in, just looking at the military perspective, obviously there's lots of onboarding programs.
The most commonly known ones, though, I think, of course, are enlisting in the military, or if you are, if you have a college degree, going and going and becoming a member of swearing in as a member of the officer corps.
I actually had the opportunity to do both, interestingly enough.
So when you go into enlist, you take something called the ASVAP, the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery, which is still a test which determines whether or not you can get in.
And then depending on your score on the test, that determines which jobs are open to you.
So when I went in for the Navy, that opened up a certain amount of jobs.
When I either, they basically said to me, you can either be a nuclear engineer or an intelligence analyst.
I said, I want Intel because I never want there to be an issue with the nuclear reactor.
And then they said, hey, let's call Posovic.
Let's get him in there.
And then Fukushima happened a few years later.
So I was right.
And on the officer side, it is a little bit more, I got to say, Charlie, that is where, and by the way, it's the same as VAP, regardless of which branch you're going into.
So there's not a different one for army, Navy, Marines, Air Force.
It's all the same one.
Now on the officer side, if there were any social engineering going on, that's where you would definitely have that come in because they adopt same as, as these institutions, this holistic approach.
Yes, there is a test, but that's only one piece of it.
And then there's a whole, you know, what they call the holistic approach, which of course is taken from university admissions to determine who can become an officer in whatever various community you might be going into.
So there's obviously the branches, but then, um, so I'm, I'm more familiar with intelligence core, but, um, there's, you know, there's different sort of in the Navy, for example, there's service warfare, there's submariners, um, electronic warfare.
There's many different obviously.
And then, uh, various of the logistics and, and, Obviously legal, of course, Ron DeSantis also was a member of the legal corps as a JAG officer, for example, so the JAG Corps.
There's a few interesting things here, Jack, which is one, back in 2020, there was, you know, during the big Floyd meltdown, there was a kind of a set of recommendations that was produced in the military for how to improve diversity in the upper officer ranks.
And one of the recommendations, which was accepted, I can't remember which official accepted it.
It was, I think, one of I think one of Trump's appointees at DOD, uh, where one of the recommendations was remove any aptitude, uh, tests or requirements related to officer promotion that were, uh, hindering diversity.
And that was actually accepted by, uh, that per- by that senior official who I don't have the name in front of me.
And I don't know what ramifications that might have produced yet, but that was something they did accept in late 2020 as, like, something they should aim to do.
And another thing was that, There was a, I believe an admiral who a few years ago, they started, they removed photos from promotion boards.
They stopped using photos.
And then this guy came out and said, actually, we should put the photos back in.
Cause that will improve our diversity shot.
So we're definitely seeing.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So an officer board is different than the onboarding process that I was just talking about.
An officer board is when you're going up for promotion.
So.
Uh, in an officer board, the board is constituted in, in Navy.
It's actually down in Tennessee, believe it or not, uh, in Millington.
And this is where a group of officers is brought together and then they review packages for promotion into these higher, um, higher echelons.
And one of the main, right, one of the main components of this is having a photo of the officer there.
So initially at one point, There was a huge push to say, you know what?
We want to be colorblind.
We don't want anything to do with this.
We're going to remove the photos.
And that was pushed for a while.
But then suddenly, all along the while, it came back and they said, no, we're going to put those pictures back in because essentially and these are very fast, by the way, when an officer board is being held, the the time that you take to actually look at each officer that goes through the board is very quick.
We're talking minutes.
So you're looking at specific Yeah, and so, I mean, this is a good thing, but let's talk about the fundamental lie of what this is based on.
Andrew, you could kick in here if whoever wants to.
to look at it plays a huge role.
And of course, they're never going to come out and admit this, but it's obvious why they put it back in.
They put it back in because they want to promote diversity.
Yeah.
And so, I mean, this is a good thing, but let's talk about the fundamental lie of what this is based on.
Andrew, you could kick in here if whoever wants to.
The fundamental lie is that somehow disparate incomes can be, let's just take the most innocent reading, as if there's not a clearly anti-white, anti-Asian agenda here, which of course they're right.
We said that and everyone lost their mind.
But there is a war on white people and it's been that way for a couple decades.
But putting that aside, let's pretend they mean well, okay?
That they want to try to fix disparate incomes and impact.
That somehow you can do this by disenfranchising.
But there's a cost to everything, isn't there?
So, Andrew, that if you're going to all of a sudden accommodate something that doesn't matter against something that does matter, there's a cost to everything in life.
And what you're going to get is you're going to get a institution that is not in the pursuit of excellence, that is in the pursuit of parity or egalitarianism.
You're going to get this.
And I mean, so here's a thought prime interesting question.
Andrew, you can go first.
Has affirmative action been one of the reasons why our colleges are more mediocre than they really should be?
Is that fair to say, when you do not have excellent B, the primary reason to let people into your schools, and this is not something that is foreign to Victor Davis Hanson, for example.
Victor Davis Hanson has spoken out for decades, saying that the students that are coming into Stanford, they do not know basic information, that they are not equipped or prepared, they do not work as hard, they should take an exit exam after they're there because they're barely learning anything.
Andrew, is that too far to say?
Has affirmative action contributed to what I would call the college scam?
Yeah, I mean, I think there's no doubt about it.
I think it's, you know, we just had somebody actually, the day I was guest hosting for you, we had somebody on the show, James Fishback, who was talking about the bastardization of high school speech and debate classes.
So now they have all these woke judges that are coming in and basically telling kids they're not allowed to talk about certain topics.
So they're not allowed to defend capitalism, Israel.
They're not allowed to defend You know, honestly, affirmative action was one of the things they're not allowed to defend.
This is the day before the ruling came down.
But I also think so.
So when you when you do that, you have a ideological desert on college campuses.
You also have a bunch of kids that are then become really good at self-censoring and not so much defending ideas.
Right.
So I think I think that's a big part of it.
Yeah.
I think you also have the fact that you're just getting less qualified people.
It was a funny debate that happened today, because as soon as the ruling came out, We got that really annoying tweet from Michelle Obama.
And everybody on the right was like, yeah, you stole somebody's spot at Princeton that was more qualified than you.
You don't believe me?
I know that she's like this big celebrity right now.
You don't believe me?
Go look at your honors thesis.
The thing was written from an eighth grader's perspective.
It has multiple typos in the conclusion.
It just has a bunch of typos in it.
It's amazing.
I kid you not, it was written like this.
I believe being a black person at Princeton is good because, and I think that it's not okay to discriminate against black people because.
It was the most, I mean, the clauses of these sentences were literally rudimentary.
They were elementary.
So I think, yeah, the quality goes down.
But I think another thing that, and actually Blake highlighted this, so Blake, feel free to chime in.
This case that you mentioned before, Bakke, right?
It was argued in front of the Supreme Court, and it was about racial quotas, and now it was Patrick Chavis and Alan Bakke, right?
So Bakke was a white guy who challenged racial quotas at UC Davis.
UC Davis!
All roads lead to UC Davis.
Yeah, I know, right?
Patrick Chavis is a black guy who was admitted to UC Davis under affirmative action the year Bakke was rejected, okay?
So this is a really interesting story.
Go ahead and throw Bakke's picture up here, right?
Or Chavis's picture.
It's at number 100, I believe.
So this guy becomes the poster child of why State Senator Tom Hayden asked his fellow Californians Who made the most of his medical school education?
From whom did California taxpayers benefit more?
He was the poster child of affirmative action because he was this black man that wouldn't have gotten in had it not been for affirmative action.
He supposedly went on to have this great career.
But lo and behold, this guy ended up, I got to get the exact number, but he was sued.
I'm talking like, was over 21 times for medical malpractice and gross negligence.
The California Medical Board brought 90 counts of misconduct and gross negligence.
And instead of being the perfect example of a doctor, he literally stripped of his license because he was so incompetent.
This guy should be the poster child to defend what the Supreme Court just did today.
And most people have never revisited the case.
The New York Times did this Big expose on him, celebrating him.
He was the poster child.
And then it turns out he was the exact opposite of that, but they never wrote about it.
So the New York Times never closed the case.
They never corrected the record.
And ironically enough, he ended up dying at like 50 years old.
He got murdered on the street, which is really sad.
In 2002, at the age of 50, murdered by carjackers on the streets of Hawthorne.
So he's like this cautionary tale wrapped up in a Blue City Bow.
It's crazy, actually.
You're missing the best anecdote, which is that during the malpractice investigation into him, a tape recording surfaced in which he was chanting, liar, liar, pants on fire, while one of his patients was screaming in agony over his poor handling of them.
Yeah, wasn't he like a liposuction doctor or something?
That's what he killed someone.
He was doing like a fly-by-night liposuction operation and the person died and he like fled the scene after it was botched, so he was missing for a time period.
Charlie, to answer your question, Dr. Chavis is what you get when you stop caring about excellence and meritocracy and you just care about skin tone.
And so Blake, is it am I being too Let's just say cruel to college to say that affirmative action is one of the reasons why colleges have become places of mediocrity.
Where low IQ thinking reigns supreme.
Okay, tell me why.
Not at all.
There's actually, I'm just remembering this and I'm bringing it up on Heterodox Academy.
It's not on the laptop, guys.
Don't bring it up.
But it's this letter that was written by a California judge in 1969, which is Yale law at that time.
This is before the Supreme Court said you couldn't do quotas.
So Yale basically just announced they're going to do a racial quota.
And this California Court of Appeals judge, Macklin Fleming, wrote a letter to the dean of Yale Law School, and then I think he eventually made the letter public in some way, because we do have it now.
And so I'm reading this letter on Heterodox Academy, and he pointed out what was going to happen as a result of this.
And it's so prescient.
Remember, this is being written in 1969.
And what Judge Fleming writes is he first anticipates, well, they're less qualified, so they're going to not do as well in class.
He just predicts that.
And then here's what he predicts will happen in the future.
"No one can be expected to accept an inferior status willingly.
Black students, unable to compete on even terms in the study of law, inevitably will seek other means to achieve recognition and self-expression.
This is likely to take two forms.
First, agitation to change the environment from one where they are unable to compete to one in which they can.
Demands will be made for the elimination of competition, reduction in standards of performance, adoption of courses of study which do not require intensive legal analysis, and recognition for academic credit of sociological activities which have only an indirect relationship to legal training.
Second, it seems probable that this group will seek personal satisfaction and public recognition by aggressive conduct, which, although ostensibly directed at external injustices and problems, will in fact be primarily motivated by the psychological needs of the members of the group to overcome feelings of inferiority caused by lack of success in their studies." Unquote.
Are you, uh, are you thinking he's, uh, predicting race hoaxes?
Is that what you're calling here?
He's predicting that, but also, I mean, we've literally seen that, uh, where professors, you know, are giving extra credit if you're doing, uh, political activities on campus.
We've seen, uh, it's famously at a lot of universities, the sort of grievance studies departments, you know, black studies, queer studies, women's and gender studies.
These are almost always low standards.
They're very easy to get A's in.
Let me, let me ask one more question, Jack, maybe just from the institution of colleges.
It's important to wonder who's actually pushing this.
It's not the donors.
The donors really don't care.
In fact, they're against it.
It's not the state legislatures in a lot of these states.
It seems as if it's actually the faculty and the administrators.
So Jack, they've been centrally planning these colleges for 40 years with a regime of anti-racism.
And the result is colleges that are crummier than ever and crappier than ever.
Jack Postovic, final thoughts on this topic.
Well, I mean, Charlie, you're right.
And I think higher education at this level probably isn't meant for all people.
Most people don't need it.
It's just a way for them to get into debt slavery.
But I also wanted to point out that as positive as we've all been in talking about RFK Jr., he's come out extremely against this decision.
He's saying that colorblind admissions tend to favor those who are already in the circle of privilege.
It favors those who grew up in affluent, educated households like himself, obviously.
Wouldn't you like to invite in those who have been left out in the cold?
So going full pathos with this, RFK Jr.
completely coming out against the Supreme Court today, really burgeoning, of course, his family's legacy on politically speaking with the Civil Rights Act and trying to gather up a lot of those votes in terms of that the same way that his father and uncle did.
Yeah, that's... Remember, he is a Democrat, everybody, as Blake keeps on reminding me when I praise him, and I appreciate that counterbalance whenever I praise him, but I'm glad he's running, and I think that it's exciting that he challenges the corporate Leviathan that runs our country.
Okay, this actually ties beautifully from one topic to the other.
So we go from the policy of the regime of anti-racism to a story that has gone totally viral, that shows what people fear the most, and it is not an exaggeration.
To say, in this video, that some people truly fear being called a racist more than getting murdered.
That is not an exaggeration.
Being called a racist would make you tremble in fear more than the idea of actually getting your cut, your head cut off.
Play cut 85, I am not exaggerating.
And there's a lot of elements here, and there is a very, very, very base take here.
Is he wrong?
Playcut 85.
Why is it happening?
I'm being arrested?
Yes.
For what?
For what?
I'll be with you in just one second.
Are you arrested?
Mm-hmm.
I just wanted to leave him alone.
But still he, um, I will need for you to fill out a statement for him.
I don't want him arrested.
I just want to leave him alone.
I know, but he had a weapon on him and it was terrorist threats.
Brandishing is not a crime with a knife.
Brandishing is only a crime for a gun.
Terroristic threats though, sir.
Because he said die to me and had his knife out?
All that was done.
The threats, everything.
Let me get a statement.
I thought you were going to arrest him.
I wouldn't call.
I just wanted to leave this alone.
I understand, but we still have a job to do.
Now he's going to think I'm doing this because I'm white and he's black.
Or he's homeless and I'm not.
I don't want that.
But did he do what he did?
Yeah, but I don't want him thinking I did it because he's in whatever situation he's in.
I just want him to leave us alone.
I doubt that.
Oh my gosh.
I mean, if this breaks that bad, please euthanize me.
What happened in Georgia?
That's Georgia.
Yeah, no, it's in Georgia.
Brian Kemp.
And so you got a black terrorist with a knife.
And that, by the way, that's not an exaggeration of a description.
That is this amazing police officer, and I love this, I love this based, I'm inferring she's black and I don't want, I think she's a black police officer based on public reporting.
Yes.
And if I'm wrong, please correct me.
But I just, and first of all, you could tell she's not very tall because she's looking up, right?
So, and she's just doing her job.
And she's like, well, didn't he do what you said he did?
It is hard to put into words here.
However, Yes, let's make fun of him first.
Let's go through that cycle.
But what did this guy... What did this guy fear?
This guy feared that he might get doxxed, that he might get the Karen treatment.
But first, let's start here.
Jack, what country do we live in where a white metrosexual beta male, Chris Hayes type, starts crying terribly when a guy who's threatening, I assume, his family with a knife And he starts crying.
And by the way, we just got to play this one more time.
Cut 86.
This is going to be the new meme.
It's the new screaming up to the heavens.
Why shall you arrest black criminals?
I don't want them to think it's because they're black.
Play cut 86 again.
He's going to think I'm doing this because I'm white and he's black.
Or he's homeless and I'm not.
I don't want that.
But did he do what he did?
Yeah, but I don't want him thinking I did it because he's in whatever situation he's in.
I just want him to leave us alone.
I doubt that.
Okay, Jack.
I didn't want anyone to think I did it because he's in whatever situation he's in.
I just, I just did it because, because I'm not racist.
I'm just, I don't have to arrest him.
Look, you gotta, and for folks who are listening on the podcast side, Uh, this is a, I mean, that individual is, is pretty big actually physically.
I mean, you're looking at someone who's at least six foot because you can see the fence and that person's at least as tall as the fence, uh, based on the angle of the body cam and possibly a little bit taller than that fence.
Um, seems to be, you know, pretty got some mass, not a, not a skinny guy, but is by any means, but is just losing it.
That's a man you're listening to, by the way, folks on the podcast, uh, you are listening to the voice of a man whose voice is cracking because he realizes that the psychopathic criminal that was about to stab his family is now about to be arrested.
Keep in mind, this is someone from Georgia.
This is the Deep South.
This is a place where originally, you know, it used to be, you know, the Southern Pride, et cetera, flying the rebel flag, et cetera, all this stuff.
Now it's like completely flipped on its end.
Yeah, you're right.
This is exactly right.
This is rebel spirit becomes white guilt.
It's a complete one as if there's no nuance, right?
Well, you guys, you know, he's tall, but I'm checking and a soy plant can grow to up to six and a half feet tall.
Hold on, hold on.
I spotted in that last... Stacks of soy that tall.
With a man bun, by the way.
I know he's got a man bun.
Throw up 101.
I spotted this when you played it last time, Charlie.
That's a man bun.
I mean, if there's.
Are you sure this was not in Boulder, Colorado?
Are we sure this was not in Boulder?
I think it's I think half the the men in Boulder, Colorado, have man buns and cowboy boots and Patagonia jackets.
It's Dan Boulder.
Sorry if you're listening in Boulder, it's just... No, it's a unique, it's a unique portion of hell.
So, no, but Andrew... There's a lot going on here.
No, there's a lot of dynamics.
Let's just remind ourselves.
This is a black cop he's telling it to.
And she just, she finds, she's like, wait, but did he not do it?
But first, let's just go back to the facts.
He called the cops.
So obviously, he can't handle himself.
Obviously, he felt threatened.
Like, okay, fine.
Call the cops.
It's the right thing to do.
And then he intervenes in what could only be described as a trained response.
This is not normal.
Somebody taught him to have this kind of Pavlovian response, right?
Exactly, Jack.
This is conditioned, right?
This was something through years of initiation, years of incantation, years of training, This, that, this, that.
He was made for a moment like this.
He went to the halls of Brown to be prepared that one day he could say, I don't know what they were going through.
I don't know his condition.
By the way, what an unbelievably racist thing to say that every time you see a black person, you assume that they're in poverty and they're struggling.
Like, oh, I don't know what they're going through.
Or maybe he's just a lunatic.
Jack Posobiec.
Right, so that's also part of the learned helplessness and the conditioned response here from the left, because again, remember, and I talked about this a lot going back to the Supreme Court when Kataji Brand Jackson came in, because remember when she was giving those light sentences to pedophiles, and specifically some of the ones that she was talking about were saying, we're all talking about the person's background, the persons, what they went through, what they were going through in life.
This is a different way of looking at criminal justice.
It is a way that is preached by the institutional left.
It's a way that's also beyond universities and that system.
It's pushed through mainstream media.
It's this idea that there are two classes of society.
It's inherently Marxist.
One is the oppressor class.
One is the oppressed class.
So if you adhere to that worldview, then any belief, anything that occurs from the oppressed class is through their response to oppression by the uppers, by the you know, by the boards, whatever it is, right, whatever that oppressor class is.
And he, as a white colonizer, therefore, is feeling the white guilt of bringing down more oppression on someone who's clearly been oppressed their entire life.
He's literally trying to kill your family with a knife right now.
And so that's a trained response.
But, but, but, let's now go again.
He was a total moron about this, but if he would have done this a little bit differently, let's say he would have went to the cop and been like, yo, I really don't want to be involved in this.
You know, I didn't know he was going to get arrested.
I'm not filling out a form.
And he just walked away, but he showed his card.
But what if the real card was not that?
What if the real card was what he said was that I didn't want him to think?
What if he was afraid of doxing, cancellation, losing his job the same way of what happened in Central Park?
Not the Central Park Five.
We're not going to talk about it this week, but Central Park.
Karen, remember this story, the birdwatching thing?
I'm a little rusty on the details.
So there's multiple there's multiple elements here.
There's the the Central Park birdwatcher.
There's the more recent story with the girl that was fighting with the black youths for the bike, to rent the bike, the pregnant lady at the hospital, and then she ended up getting, you know, at least put on leave because she did that.
And then don't forget Daniel Penny, right?
I mean, the whole Daniel Penny thing plays into it.
It's a different scenario, but... This is social conditioning.
Like, this trains people to respond a certain way.
Yeah, well, no, but so the point is maybe the guy's just freaking got an IQ of 150.
He realizes this thing could go viral and he just like got himself out of it.
I don't know.
You know, like he literally was like, I'm not going to lose my job.
Maybe he's got it.
Maybe he's got a house with six kids at it and he's got to keep his job.
And he instantly like clued in.
I mean.
Jack, probably not, but it was actually smart in that way, which is sad.
It's sad that that's the society we live in.
Well, he's being praised by people on the left.
So, Jack, remind us of Central Park Karen.
Right, so the Central Park Karen, and this was that interesting case where both of them had the same last name, although they were completely unrelated, Christian Cooper and Amy Cooper.
She brings, OK, in the video, in the video, we see that a woman is with a black man.
She's calling the police on the black man, saying this guy threatened me.
I'm here alone in the park.
I'm with my dog.
He is.
He is threatening me.
He's making threatening comment, threatening gestures.
I feel unsafe.
I'm calling the police.
He starts filming her saying she's calling the police because I'm a black man.
And I tried to tell her to put the dog's leash on because this, and keep in mind, this is during the height of COVID.
This was right around the same time.
It was like the same day.
Yeah.
I think it was the same day to be honest.
Um, May 25th.
Right.
Um, but then the video came out a little bit later.
And so.
Uh, all this is going on, but of course, just like with any viral video, you have to play that game.
What happened 30 seconds before?
And so the, this whole thing goes off and obviously this is what we're wanting to get into.
She gets doxxed.
She loses her job.
Uh, she loses the dog at one point, eventually gets the dog back because the dog is, is unadopted by her, by the adoption agency.
It's actually taken back.
The gentleman involved in all of this, this guy who, who accused her Of being racist, Christian Cooper, he's getting a TV show now for birdwatching on, I want to say it's Nat Geo.
Uh, I don't see it here right now, but it's, yeah, it's one of those, um, one of those networks and the dirty little secret is, is that guy in the early days, and I've got it, I've got it screenshotted.
Cause I, cause I always keep the receipts.
He admitted later on Facebook that before he filmed the video, he said that he was going to take her dog from her.
And he said, I keep special things in my pockets to make dogs come and you're not going to like what happens if I need to use them.
So he admitted on his own Facebook that he threatened her, right?
That's obviously threatening language, obviously threatening the dog.
She calls the police because she's feeling threatened.
And it doesn't matter because the entire hate mob and even us, like we're all guilty of it because we still all refer to it as the Central Park Karen.
Hey, I just want to, I want to quickly say that I'm getting some support in the chat about my Boulder take.
They said it's 20, uh, BG Lent says Boulder is 27 square miles surrounded by reality.
They aren't, and then Freewell 75.
Denver is not reality.
That's not true.
Well, fine.
Uh, Freewell 75 says they aren't listening in Boulder.
That's why I left Colorado.
My state got broken.
Amen, brother.
Charlie and I have literally, I mean, how many texts Have we exchanged about Boulder?
I want to call on Blake in a second, but the reason that we don't like that whole corridor up there, right?
Boulder, Westminster, is that you have the most disgusting Silicon Valley people that then aesthetically appropriate Colorado mountain culture.
I'm like, dude, you can't pitch a tent, like stop wearing flannel.
Like the whole, you don't not know what to do with those boots.
Okay.
And those hiking shoes, they all have boots and they come in to Starbucks and like, Three months ago they were working in Menlo Park and they got reallocated to some data center that just got built.
You know, right there in Westminster or Broomfield on the way to Boulder, like, I'm a mountain man!
Like, no you're not, actually.
Like, you can't boil water to save your life in Rocky Mountain National Park, pal.
Blake, your thoughts?
Not on that, that's a tangent.
I just found the exact thing... I found the exact thing Christian Cooper said, which, this is literally what he posted on Facebook himself, and we wouldn't even have the evidence for it otherwise.
Oh, this is the guy?
The Christian Cooper guy, the guy who has his own TV show on National Geographic.
And he's like, look, he asked her to leash her dog or something, and she told him to buzz off.
And he said, if you're going to do what you want, I'm going to do what I want, but you're not going to like it.
And then he beckoned the dog toward him with a dog treat.
And so I just feel it was like very rational to think that he was going to try to poison the dog.
And that's basically what set her off by his own admission.
And then, yeah, as you said, she lost her job.
And there was a whole genre of videos that started happening that summer.
I don't have it in front of me, but there was one where this absolute psycho guy stalked A woman back to her home and is like recording her license plate and calling her a Karen and she's like screaming for him to go away and trying to cover it up because she knows that this guy can publish the video and ruin her life.
Or that Jonathan Pentland guy in I think it was Columbia, South Carolina.
There's this guy literally wandering their neighborhood, like, sticking his hand down women's shorts and, like, grabbing babies and trying to walk away with them.
And the police are just letting this guy roam around all the time.
And so he's doing it again.
And so one of the neighbors goes to this guy.
Jonathan Pentland is like, hey, can you make this guy go away?
Because he's a big, tough army guy.
And so he confronts him, tells him to get out of their neighborhood because he's not from around there, and then that, of course, gets recorded by a passerby, gets denounced by the Obama administration.
He ends up getting convicted of assault for shoving a guy and probably, as a result, messes up his Army career.
I think he had to get transferred if he wasn't drummed out entirely.
Because he was defending his neighborhood when the cops were literally letting a crazy guy roam around until he'd inevitably try to kill someone, which seems to be what we now have to do, whether it's on a New York subway or anywhere else.
You're just supposed to let crazy nutjobs do whatever they want until until they literally kill someone.
Well, and Blake, by the way, just I left this out.
I'm looking this up as well.
Amy Cooper, the Central Park Karen, right, Amy Cooper, she was charged.
She was actually charged in New York City for filing a false police report at the time.
So this this hate mob against her, this is Two Minutes Hate.
It's straight from 1984.
It's straight from Orwell.
So when the Two Minutes Hate was directed at her, the government of the city of New York actually filed charges against her for filing a false police report without going into any of the investigation.
Without looking at the Facebook post, without seeing what had gone down, what had happened, it was eventually completely dropped.
They dropped all the charges, they went after her, but she did lose her job, she got the dog back, but she literally could have faced a year in jail if they got the maximum penalty for this, and it was completely false.
It was completely false from the start.
Okay, guys, let's go to the next topic here, everybody.
Anybody we need to mention in the Rumble chats?
Andrew?
Forge and Anvil just put $5 forward, so thanks, Forge and Anvil.
I think Forge and Anvil is a podcast show dedicated to having hard conversations about politics.
Okay.
From a faith perspective.
You gotta read them.
If you Rumble rant, we gotta read them.
Well, unless you say something regarding bonus lists.
Right.
So email us.
There we go.
All right.
So it went very viral.
And look, I'm very honest when I don't know something, I ask questions.
I'm not like a politician where I say, oh, yeah, I know what that is.
So who wants to take this next topic?
Because I have no idea what the heck this is about.
I think I think Jack should explain bonus hole to Charlie.
All right, Charlie.
So Charlie, so I got I got the bonus holes, right?
Should I Google that, too?
Don't Google it.
No, no, no, no, no, no.
I'm just asking.
You've heard of bonus holes.
You don't know bonus holes?
No, Jack.
I don't know much about holes and that whole genre, apparently.
Whole genre of holes.
Yeah, Charlie, there's a wide cornucopia of holes out there, Charlie, and you need to be familiar with all of them.
In addition to all the other things that you do with your life, if you're not Keeping up.
I think that, honestly, maybe the next production or the first publication of ThoughtCrime here could be Holopedia, and we could be putting together an entire compendium of all of the various holes that we're learning about as we continue our journey through the internet.
But here we have a new one.
It's called the Bonus Hole.
The Bonus Hole comes to us by way of Joe's Cervical Cancer Trust.
What is Joe's Cervical Cancer Trust, you ask?
This is funded by the British government, as well as the LGBT Foundation, described as incredibly important to the work of the government equities office and the advancement of equality in the UK.
They ask, OK, what does this have to do with bonus holes?
So there are cervical cancer charity recommending that when they make phone calls to trans individuals or perhaps trans identifying individuals, that you may want to use less traditional terminology when referring to the part of the female anatomy formerly known as a vagina, and they are now suggesting new terminology be used.
In one case they suggest perhaps a front hole, you know, as opposed obviously to the back hole, or the bonus hole, an alternative word for vagina.
It is important to check Which words someone would prefer to use?
So, you know, that's for folks that are making phone calls about the cervical cancer.
They just want to make sure that you're using the right terminology.
Jack, a week ago, did you know what this term meant?
Yeah, no, I had no idea.
I actually don't even think this existed.
Okay, alright, so I'm not that out of the lingo.
This is brand new.
Okay, glory hole, you can mock me all you want.
By the way, I'm proud I didn't know what a glory hole was, okay?
Bonus hole, I mean, now we're really pushing the boundaries of decency.
Andrew.
I mean, I'm just, I'm just, this is like a popcorn moment for me.
I'm just enjoying the ride here.
You know, I think, listen, it's just another assault on our language.
It's like one of those things we have to talk on a show like ThoughtCrime.
But on the other hand, I'm a little offended that we're even having the conversation, if I'm being honest.
Like, should we give them the oxygen that we breathe to even entertain this crap?
I mean, I'm just, you know, we went from, like, this Pride Month to this, like, weekend of Sodom and Gomorrah that we all saw on the streets of San Francisco and New York and Seattle, where, like, grown men are on the streets, like, whipping each other in leather straps and Scott Wieners out there celebrating it.
And it's like, what have we become?
You know, yeah, this is in London, but it might as well be in America.
We're just as degenerate as they are.
And, you know, it's like we're more degenerate with certain stuff than the UK.
Yeah, for sure.
No.
And it just it's it's really offensive on some level that, you know, like it's funny.
So I think it's funny talking about it on another on another level.
I'm just offended that this is like, you know, we talk about the Overton window, right?
It's like it's just another thing.
That we inject into the zeitgeist that makes us all poorer and more despicable.
It's like... Go ahead, Jack.
We got a comment in here from William Roche.
He said, the bonus hole monologues.
Yes, the bonus hole monologues have begun, folks.
The bonus hole monologues.
Blake, do you have some sort of hot intellectual take here?
Is there some sort of esoteric book you have to mention?
I wanted to check if this existed, and it turns out it does.
So, this is a cervical cancer charity, and they've focused with this story on how this is an alternative term for trans men, who I guess they don't want their bonus hole, as it were, to be referred to by its dead name, that is, for women only.
But I think I'd read about another thing, and so I checked, and the Canadian Cancer Society, bring it up on the screen, I have it on the laptop here, The Canadian Cancer Society has a guide, as a trans woman, do I need to get screened for cervical cancer?
And they do helpfully point out that if you are a trans woman, that is a biological male, you do not have a cervix, and so you probably shouldn't get screened for it.
Although they note that if you have undergone bottom surgery, there is a very small risk that you can develop cancer in the tissue Of your neocervix, as they call it.
Which would not actually be cervical cancer, because it's just made out of some other horrifying biological mess that they used to create it.
But, you know, you can get it checked for cancer, too.
Neocervix?
Neocervix.
Or your neovagina.
And you really do not want to know the science about how that is created.
Mad science.
They kind of cut a haunch out of, like, your thigh to manufacture it, I believe.
Is this the one that comes from the forearm?
Or is that different?
Actually, that might be neo-penis.
It's easy to get these mixed up.
I think, actually, for the neo-cervix, they kind of just carve a gash out of your lower torso.
Okay, so it has to be your own skin.
It can't be, like, a prosthetic or something like that?
What's the... Can you make a prosthetic of, like, a hole?
like a void your prosthetic void yeah sure you can make a prosthetic of anything blake i guess i guess and then you know to keep it from filling in like a wound you have to you know you have to do you have to use those dilators to keep them from closing up it's it's pretty horrifying that's true that's true yeah does charlie know what that is have we taught him that vocab word yet wait that's not even that's not even novel that's like that's like That's old lore at this point.
The dilators, Charlie, do you know about those for this lovely trans anatomy?
No.
Oh, well, you see, when you make a trans woman, if you give them bottom surgery, it turns out that when you make a fake vagina by just carving a gash in someone's torso, your body surprisingly thinks that this is just a giant open wound and tries to heal it.
And so the only way you can keep your body from, you know, waging war on your real identity as a trans person is to literally stick a gigantic you-know-what up your neo-vagina to keep it from closing up.
And you have to do this for hours a day when you first get it, and basically you have to do it forever, otherwise it closes up.
So now you know, Charlie.
I can't—so that's not technically a bonus hole, or it is?
It's a dialator.
Bonus hole dialator.
That's a neo-vagina, Charlie.
Neo-bonus hole.
Be careful.
Anyone have any other thoughts on this topic before we move to the next one?
No, let's go to the next one!
I think, well, the last thing I just have to say is, guys, you know what they say, grab them by the bonus hole.
You get extra points.
Grab them by the bonus hole should be new bumper stickers for 2024.
Wow.
All in.
Bonus holes for a bonus term.
Alright, next topic.
Next topic.
Tom Hanks' niece.
Jack, I'll let you drive on this one.
Not as caught up on this.
Uh, this one I think Andrew knows more about, to be honest.
I haven't watched this yet, but Andrew was digging in, like, researching the Hanks family in great detail.
Alright, alright.
This is, this is, uh, the chat.
Okay.
Ryan, let me know what clips these are.
Okay, so the backstory here is that there is a show called on ABC that I'd never heard of actually before called Claim to Fame.
As if you weren't watching it live.
I was not.
It's called Claim to Fame and all the contestants are related to famous people, right?
So I guess Whoopi Goldberg, I found this out researching for this segment, Whoopi Goldberg's niece was on it before, and apparently she had a meltdown when she got booted.
But you basically have to—you get booted off the show if another contestant guesses who you're related to.
And Tom Hanks' niece was apparently one of the first people to— Wait, wait, wait.
Each competitor has, like, a famous relative?
Is that the idea?
Yes.
Yes, exactly.
So, listen, I'll just—I'll throw it to 83.
I think it's the best Primer for this.
Let's go to 83.
Carly, I am sad to see you go, but it is time for you to say goodbye to your fellow players.
These frickin' clothes are so frickin' obvious!
Frickin' bench, that's a frickin' poster of frickin' Forrest Gump, are you kidding me?
There's literally no reference to benches on any other movie.
Even Gabriel found that out.
He's not even, like, smart.
For real?
That's cool.
I didn't even get to do any challenges!
I don't deserve this!
I should have more camera time!
I should be here longer!
Is that even real?
It's reality TV!
It sounds like she's playing for the camera.
Yeah, I don't actually know.
I mean, that was extra.
Maybe you guys are right, because the View reacted to this today, which I hate to give them any more air time, but let's go ahead and play Cut84.
I gotta tell you, I loved the freakout that she had.
Which one?
The young lady now?
I loved both of them.
I loved Amara's freakout too, because she was telling him to kiss her butt and all kinds of stuff, so it was good.
It was different, because she was owning it.
She was not being dragged.
Yeah, but this girl, it was just such good television.
I didn't even get any challenges!
That was not fair!
I was joking to my producer that that's basically me when I get pulled out of a good guest segment.
I needed more camera time!
That is not even true!
She was a legend.
She's gonna make that show better.
That was good!
She had two credits I think.
She's good.
She should host that show.
So...
This is why we get the culture that we have.
We're rewarding, by way of the view, this abhorrent behavior by a spoiled rich girl that happens to be related to Tom Hanks, and I find it appalling.
They should put Barron Trump on that show.
Everybody would guess it.
What is he up to, like 6'8", 6'9"?
No, but he would just dominate them.
Is that what this is, basically?
Do you like win money on this show or is it literally just like people desperate to be on TV?
I just looked it up.
You can win, yeah, you can win like a hundred grand.
And the idea is that with, with various competitions that you go through and you, you know, you guess certain things about people.
Again, I've literally never heard about this, you know, until about five minutes ago that you, um, you know, that you can reveal more information about the person.
And so the idea is because we live in such a meta self-referential culture right now.
That it used to be that you would just go watch a movie or go watch a TV show and you'd like it.
You'd like, you might know the actor, you might recognize them and say, Oh, I'm going to go see that actor.
I like when I go see that actress.
I like them.
But now everything's meta.
So everybody's got to know everything about every little other thing.
So you can't just be a person.
There's you, there's your family, there's your, uh, your, your fans, your stands, et cetera, et cetera.
And so when you have something like this, they've got like Chuck, I'm just looking through Chuck Norris, Chuck Norris's grandson.
Uh, Brett Favre's daughter, Al Sharpton's daughter, Tiffany Haddish's sister, Whoopi Goldberg's granddaughter, Dean Martin's granddaughter, Jason Aldean's cousin, the sister of Keke Palmer was on.
You know, Blake actually might qualify for this because people may not realize this, but Blake actually is a distant relation to Louis Farrakhan.
Wait, what?
I think I've only, like, related to basically, like, dirt farmers in Germany or something.
I have, like, the least distinguished pedigree of all time.
Well, I mean, I mean, if you're just going to talk about Farrakhan that way, he did lead the Nation of Islam.
That's fair.
Hold on.
All right.
We're missing the biggie on the eye chart.
This lady literally threw a freak out on national TV.
One of the most objectively horrible reactions you could possibly have.
And Alyssa Farrah, who worked at the Trump White House, Who's a total Judas.
Nevertheless, this woman's a legend.
And then the other girls chime in that she should host the show.
What the hell is wrong with our country?
Well, Elissa Farrah, of course, is a daughter herself.
What's that?
Elissa Farrah is the daughter of Joseph Farrah, who ran WorldNetDaily.
So she already was somebody who got in in an act of nepotism because her father was... Now, I wouldn't say WorldNetDaily is considered a mainstream source.
uh tagged with everything they they throw at at anyone who's grassroots um but she was she was able to get into politics because of her father obscene the whole thing's obscene charlie you don't want well no and and we won't god willing um but it just goes to show what is rewarded right this is very similar to kind of rewarding it right now aren't we we're
We've talked about this person for like six minutes more than we would have ever talked about her if she hadn't had a gigantic meltdown on national television.
But not in a good way.
There's no such thing as bad publicity if you're like a Z-tier celebrity relative.
Tell that to the Zodiac Killer!
Or like, yeah, there is some bad publicity.
This, Jack, you bring up an interesting point.
We're against Ted Cruz now?
Yeah, you can get elected to the Senate if you do that.
It's a vow.
Hold on.
Jack, you bring up an interesting point, actually.
Because I was actually talking about this today in our chat.
Do you know that the, Charlie made me, because Charlie changed our second hour intro music to the Bowles song, you know?
Yes.
I'm so conscious to bringing back the 90s.
Yes.
The excellent, the culture of dominance.
So I've been watching The Last Dance again.
I hadn't watched it since COVID.
Isn't it beautiful?
I watch it.
I watch it once a year.
A tradition every year.
It's amazing.
It's amazing.
I'm on.
I'm watching it.
So I'm into it.
I'm in this like big Jordan kick.
Did you know that Michael Jordan's son, Marcus Jordan, is dating Scottie Pippen's ex-wife, who also is an OnlyFans girl?
And Michael Jordan's apparently totally fine with it.
Wait, what's the age gap there?
Like 16 years.
But in the opposite direction.
But do you want to think about something even weirder is that it was likely that Scottie Pippen's wife was in the press box when like little Michael Jordan would walk in and like they knew each other since he was a kid.
Somebody should look it up.
I don't think they were married during the 90s run.
I don't think they were.
I think this is like he was like he was like eight years old during the 90s run.
The point is that she knew him likely as a toddler.
Yeah, exactly.
That's even weirder.
That's super.
I don't think Pippin was married to this woman during the 90s run.
Somebody should look it up.
But I but literally this woman is has an OnlyFans page and she's she has blabbed to the press about like Scottie and her sex life and all this stuff, and Jordan is apparently completely fine with it.
I'm telling you, it is very difficult to stay normal and grounded when you're like a celebrity of any level, right?
I mean, and Scottie Pippen and Michael Jordan were larger than life in the 90s and, you know, in the 2000s.
Yeah, so his wife, which wife is the one that Michael Jordan's, which one is it?
Is it Larsa?
Yeah, no, Larsa was married to Scottie during the 90s.
Hold on.
Yeah, it's Larsa.
I refuse to learn more about this unmoral principle.
Scottie Pippen has become such a bum, and it's so sad for me to say that because I'm like the biggest Bulls fan ever.
I think the 90s Bulls.
I mean, the last dance, first of all, it is objectively An exceptional cinematic product, right, Brian?
It's one of the best things.
It's unbelievable.
The music, the cinematography, the behind the scenes, the way they tell the story.
And I just love it as a Chicago guy because I'm looking back through it and it's so personal to me because how do I best explain this?
It's you're raised with this folklore and the, the, these stories.
And then all of a sudden you see it in a documentary form.
Very, very powerful.
And it's, it's, it's really special.
But Scotty Pippen... Sorry, go ahead, Andrew.
No, I'm just... Go ahead, Charlie.
Scotty never recovered from failing to win a title with the Trail Blazers.
But here's the thing about Scotty Pippen.
That's the thought crime on Scotty Pippen.
He's an above-average basketball player.
He's not an exceptional one.
Because he was able to be a very good basketball player, because Michael Jordan demanded double coverage He demanded the entire game plan alterations that Scottie Pippen, being a 6'8", small forward, right, was able to then all of a sudden cut, dash, have one-on-one matchups that were pretty advantageous and favorable to him that they otherwise wouldn't have had.
When Scottie Pippen went to the trailblazers, all of a sudden they're like, yeah, this Scottie Pippen guy's not that good.
This Scottie Pippen guy can't really do much when he gets the best defender.
I disagree somewhat.
No, no.
The evidence is this.
Pippen was not that great when Jordan went to play baseball.
Pippen was not able to... No, he was, though.
No, he was not able to carry the team.
They took the semifinals in the East to the Game 7.
I just watched the episode yesterday.
No, no, not without Michael.
They almost got through the Knicks.
Yeah.
No, no, not without Michael.
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
You can fact check me on this.
They barely... They barely... Michael was on that team.
They did not... When Michael went to go play baseball... Huh?
Yeah, when he came back from Oregon.
Yeah, he came back and...
I don't know if it was the first round.
What?
Yeah, he came back playing 45.
No, you can fact check me on this.
But when Michael came back, they barely made the playoffs and then lost in the first round.
And then Michael went back to training.
But go ahead.
Disagree, Andrew.
I don't know if it was the first round.
I thought it was the second round they took the Knicks to game seven.
And they lost in game seven.
I'm almost positive of that.
I know they played the Knicks.
Michael was in the stand.
They went 55-27, which was good for third in the conference, and then they lost to the Knicks in the semifinals in seven games.
Without Jordan.
And then he came back the next year, and they lost in the playoffs that year, too.
In his, like, half season.
But we'll always have Scottie Pippen in NBA Jam, which was sweet.
Yeah, he was like the Michael Jordan of NBA Jam.
The, uh, so get, but here, here's the really offensive part.
Okay.
So Mark, Marcus Jordan is talking about this.
Apparently they have a podcast and he's talking about, it says, I never, uh, and he gets asked, do you have a problem with the fact that she has an OnlyFans account?
And he goes, I would never want to block your success or wellbeing.
Like, can we just talk about how repulsive OnlyFans is?
Can we just do like a tangent on that?
It's one of the trashiest new trends out there.
Now, I don't know if it's how new it is.
I mean, it's... Prostitution is the world's oldest profession.
But it basically is digital prostitution.
Is that fair to say, Jack?
Well, I mean, we should really ask Blake.
I mean, he's been on OnlyFans for a couple years now, right?
Hey, hey, hey, hey, hey.
You've been very successful, and I wouldn't stand in the way of your success, Blake.
You know, we should just handle OnlyFans the way we should handle a lot of this.
We should just arrest the proprietors of it and give them the death penalty.
That would solve a lot of things.
Amazing.
The straight, straight death penalty.
That's a different kind of hole, isn't it?
We should conserve it.
You know, we've talked about bonus holes.
I just feel society would be improved if we radically expanded the number of people having, like, bonus holes added to them by a firing squad.
And that would include the OnlyFans proprietors, it would include the guys at MindGeek who run, like, every porn site, and, you know, it would probably include, like, a large chair of, you know, various, uh, you know, Antifa criminal elements who burn down police stations, and then things would be better in America, but we can't always get what we want.
So what you're saying is that you signed up there to infiltrate, right, and then go undercover, to basically find the proprietors to begin with. - You know, we can't give the details on all of our secret missions, Jack, you know?
Even with our valued audience here on Rumble.
- We have to maintain object.
But the thing is, wasn't Only Hands trying to like, were they trying to rebrand like a year or two ago?
Because I think originally-- - Yeah, they got smashed on the stuff.
Even early in OnlyFans, they would brand it for something.
They would try to make it like, oh, you know, musicians can use it to interact with their fans, OnlyFans, or, you know, other celebrities.
And then it was just, it was kind of, everyone immediately realized, wait, this is just, this is clearly for porn.
And obviously that's what succeeded with it.
And, you know, here we are today.
It's pretty sad because we live in a culture now where we, just to go back to those comments from Pippin, right?
We live in a culture where we say that's empowering, right?
That's empowering to women to be an OnlyFans.
What happens when your kids find out that you had an OnlyFans?
What happens when your grandkids find out you had an OnlyFans, right?
That stuff's going to be out there forever.
And guess what?
Those kids never had an opportunity to say, Mommy, don't do that, or I don't want Mommy to be doing something like that.
Um, and obviously the men are certainly just as bad as going into it, but we live in a culture now where we say that's empowering, but we don't say getting married and having a family is empowering and it's completely upside down.
Well, by the way, Jack, did you see that the new stat from Pew was that a record 25% of 40 year old Americans have not gotten married?
Record 40%.
In 1980, that number was 6%.
It's 25% of 40-year-olds, I believe.
That's what I said.
If I said it a different way, yeah, I apologize.
Yeah, 25% of 40-year-old Americans, 1 in 4 40-year-olds have never been married.
And that number was 6% in 1980.
Right, and that's because millennials are now hitting 40.
They're married to OnlyFans.
And they're married to OnlyFans, they're simps, paypigs, whatever you want to call them.
Um, more terminology, um, and, uh, Finn, Finn, Dom, Finn, Dom relationships.
And, and basically you got this situation where it's also something where, and, and Charlie, I think you could appreciate this because when pornography became more accessible to men, if you notice society itself became much slower.
Much less actual progress was able to be had.
Innovation became harder.
And why?
Because, well, men were always pushing those things because they were in search of that.
Well, in search or they might not have had that.
There's a really powerful chapter in one of the most popular books ever written on success by Napoleon Hill.
It's called Think and Grow Rich.
And there's an entire chapter and it's provocatively received.
It's provocatively written and not really well received by a lot of people, but I think it's totally true.
And it's all about the sex energy in the male.
And that if you want to build a business, you can understand how much life force there is in the sex energy of males.
And I think everyone who's a man totally understands this, right?
But if you remove that completely from a society, you're going to get less innovation, less entrepreneurship, less business startups.
And you're also going to get terrible outcomes when it comes to drug usage and to opioid addiction.
And your society starts to completely and totally collapse.
Yeah, there's a whole chapter called, I think, Sexual Transmutation in Napoleon Hill's book, Think and Grow Rich, on that.
Hey, I got a chat I think that's really interesting, actually, from Ooga Booga, if I can find it again.
Ooga Booga says, yes, porn has something to do with it, but 40-plus years of male-hating feminism Creeping into the TV ads showing men as idiots has a lot to do with it.
That actually resonates, right?
Because, Charlie, you always bring it up at events.
You'll be like, at the Young Women's Leadership Summit in Dallas, you said, how many of you are struggling to find men that are worth dating?
And it was like half the room went up.
That's right.
And I think this has a lot to do with it.
And every time, yeah.
It's like the male-hating in TV ads.
It's like anytime a white male is in an ad, they're like mentally enfeebled and incapable of doing literally anything at any time.
This happens in the new Indiana Jones too, so not gonna drop all in total spoilers, but he gets totally emasculated by this woman who's like the new You know, it's not his daughter.
It's like his friend's daughter, but it's basically, you know, his daughter in the film.
And here's Indiana Jones.
And there are, I guess, some scenes where they go back in time and they use the de-aging CGI on him.
But it's the same situation.
That new Hollywood will not allow any of the old characters that people liked, that people watched as heroes, just regular heroes in the 1980s, to not be emasculated or make them go woke They'll bring them forward.
This is what we call yellow stoning as well.
It's the same idea that you must depict any any act of masculinity as as being wrong, as being negative.
And then on the flip side, they'll also say that the only type of masculinity that you can actually have out there is is like the barstool sports.
I'm going to drink.
I'm going to eat bacon.
I'm going to grill.
And that's it.
Male to male transsexualism.
That's my favorite slang term for it.
It's like male to male transsexual.
Yeah.
We want to be a real man.
Just all bacon.
And we have an assault rifle.
And here's a hot woman.
It's basically a black rifle coffee ad.
We are a blackout coffee show.
Just for the record.
Hey, Charlie, speaking of which, tell us about Public Square.
Yeah, no, they're doing really well, by the way.
I don't want to spoil anything, but they're going to have some really big news coming up soon.
So keep your eyes peeled on Public Square.
PBSQ are four letters you're going to familiarize yourself with.
Public Square is amazing.
Public Square is your compass, your navigational tool for the parallel economy.
I visit my Public Square app when I'm traveling, which I've been traveling this entire week.
And I make a point to find out what businesses in the local areas I visit are in alignment with our values.
You know, we complain rightfully so, uh, to about the woke nonsense that has really infiltrated the American economy, but there are so many alternatives out there and public square has been able to help us, uh, find better options, better vendors.
Uh, and also you can join as a business owner, Jack, your thoughts on public square.
Oh, I think Public Affairs is fantastic, and honestly, I think that I know the news that is about to come out.
Michael Seifert, of course, was on Timcast last night, and so he was talking about this, but there's something really big that's about to come out.
Look, when it comes down to it, when I go to my wife, right, and she says, you know, look, I love you guys, I'm in the movement, I'm in the fight, but I also got two little kids, I'm running around like crazy, I don't know which company is good, which one's bad anymore.
It's hard to keep track of every little thing.
Obviously, Bud Light Target, people remember.
But what's great that she always told me about Public Square was that it's just one place you can sign right in, super easy to use.
It's just like Instagram and other app you would use.
And then, boom, you can go in and find.
Plus, there's deals on it, too.
There's deals, there's specials, there's discounts, etc.
It's really good.
Plus, I just want to give him a shout out.
When we were starting the show, it was like, Boom.
Called Public Square.
Hey, will you support what we're doing on this show?
And Public Square was right there for us.
So, hat tip to the guys at Public Square.
So everybody take out your phone and download the Public Square app.
That is the call to action.
It's free of charge.
And they are the exclusive partners of Thought Crimes.
And, uh, God bless them for wanting to sponsor this show.
Uh, I don't think, uh, yeah, go ahead, Jack.
No, well, so I'm looking at the chat here and I think I'm losing the chat because they're saying, Well, what are you saying, Jack?
Bacon is good.
I love my bacon eating gun toting hubby.
Guns are good.
Look, guys.
No, you don't.
Please don't get it twisted.
Obviously, bacon is good.
I love bacon.
I love my guns.
I love all of these things.
But what I'm saying is Hollywood and the media are telling you that the only type of masculinity that is acceptable is masculinity as effaced and
It communicated through these various activities, you know, going in the man cave and drinking a bunch of beer, whereas actual masculinity could mean staying with your family, not leaving your wife, not sitting and watching porn every night, not sitting and staring at your TV all day long, actually being there for people leading your family.
There's there's so many types of masculinity that do exist that are completely outside of the commodified barstool sports to do whatever you feel like, bro.
I actually, I will disagree.
I love the taste of bacon.
I do not like the idea of eating pork.
I think that the Hebrews were onto something.
I think it's an unclean animal.
I think it's dirty.
Now she's saying she was agreeing with me.
Now she's saying she was agreeing with me.
So we're good.
We're good.
I actually, I will disagree.
I love the taste of bacon.
I do not like the idea of eating pork.
I think that the Hebrews were onto something.
I think it's an unclean animal.
I think it's dirty.
And I'll say this, the only animal that Jesus had to kick out demonic spirits from, or to, were to the pigs.
The legion.
I mean.
The herd of legion.
There is no unclean food.
That's a New Testament thing.
Hey, check this out.
Do we want to go there?
I mean, this is Thought Prime.
People are asking about kosher laws.
I just finished Leviticus 11.
People are asking about black rifle coffee.
They're like, Like, yeah, Kim, Black Rifle Coffee threw Rittenhouse under the bus.
And yeah, I heard Black Rifle Coffee equals fake conservatives.
I don't want to take any stances on it.
No, I haven't taken any.
I've been on a text chain with, I think, Evan, who runs the company.
I'm told he's great.
And we've been trying to do something together, and he hasn't jumped on it.
So let's not do anything negative.
But I don't know why they're so hesitant to want to partner with us.
I think they did do a meetup with Kyle Rittenhouse recently, or, I mean, and just to be fair, I do think they did something with Kyle recently.
So yeah, I mean, look, ball's in their court, but we get a lot of nasty messages about them.
By the way, you know who was there for Kyle Rittenhouse, who did throw down when everybody was going after him, that was there and put the money in, and his birthday was yesterday.
It was the maven of Minnesota himself.
Everyone's favorite patriot, Mr. Mike Lindell.
That's right.
You know who else was there for him?
You know who else was there for Kyle Rittenhouse?
Charlie Kirk, Turning Point USA.
We had Kyle on the main stage at AmFest.
We had Kyle on the main stage at AmFest right after his acquittal, and it was epic.
Jack, you were there.
You remember.
I was on the stage.
I'll put it this way.
It was the only time In any event I've ever been at of all these events and I've been a million Trump events etc where I actually got that sense of like the Beatles on Ed Sullivan in the 1960s where the girls were screaming so much that I'm sitting it was it was what it was me then Kyle then Charlie's on the other side I couldn't hear Charlie I couldn't hear Kyle I couldn't hear anything up there the girls were screaming so loud an epic moment It was an epic moment.
It really was.
It was an Elvis-type moment.
I want to remind everybody in the audience to please get your tickets to our Turning Point Action Conference, tpaction.com.
High IQ Blake will be there doing cameos, selfies, and taking dating resumes.
So you guys can check it out, tpaction.com.
Oh yeah, I'm so glad you cut to him.
Just keep it right there as I keep talking about it.
Keep it on, Blake.
Yeah, you have to.
So high IQ Blake will be there.
And we have Donald Trump, Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Steve Bannon, Dan Bongino, Jack Posobiec, Benny Johnson.
We have the mayor of Miami, Francis Suarez, who's our third presidential candidate, who will be there.
We have an invite to every presidential candidate.
So Jack, let's do the Caesar's Palace.
Can we have the Vegas music?
I guess the Presley music would be good as a segue.
Jack, over under odds, you are running Caesar's Palace.
Do you think we're going to get more or less or even five presidential candidates at ActCon?
I think you get more.
I think you definitely get more.
I mean, look, Charlie, everybody and their mother is running for president these days.
People are announcing every five minutes.
I'd love to see Chris Christie there.
I'd love to see Ron DeSantis there.
You know who'd be great, by the way?
Who'd be great, I think, would be more welcomed than people would expect as RFK Jr.
Why wouldn't RFK Jr.
be there?
We invited him.
Did he just pull out of the Moms4Liberty conference?
Did I see that?
I don't know.
That he was going to do it and he's not going now?
I have a lot of respect for him.
I think he's really great on some of the corporate stuff.
Blake has strong opinions against him.
That's fine.
And we have to remember he's a Democrat.
The counterbalance is good.
But no, we did invite him.
We did.
And I don't think he's going to be able to make it.
Alright.
Last night was fantastic.
We have to engage with the chat here.
We have someone claiming that they used to have a tryst with Jen Psaki after track practice.
In high school?
In high school.
She had a boyfriend.
She seems like a track girl.
She had a boyfriend.
I had a girlfriend.
So we would grudge sex during practice.
Okay.
Unprovable.
Unsubstantiated.
Without evidence.
A lot of people are saying.
A lot of people are saying.
So tpaction.com.
We also have Senator Rick Scott confirmed.
Senator Ted Cruz confirmed.
It's going to be amazing.
In fact, we're going to be doing Thought Crimes live from Florida in two weeks.
That's going to be a fun show, isn't it, Jack?
We're going to be able to do it in person in Florida.
I think that's going to be a fantastic show.
Plus, there's some other live shows that I think we're talking about.
So if this one goes well, this will be the first one.
And it'll probably be a complete mess because we're going to be throwing stuff like this out like crazy.
I want to do a live Q&A the same way we're reading the comments right now.
I'd love to do a live Q&A on thought crimes and just put everybody on the spot.
Ask literally ask us anything.
Just ask us anything.
Uh, if you come up to that specific session.
I don't even want there to be any actual, you know, topic or set agenda, anything like that.
Just come out.
But, um, if that one goes well, I think that with everything that's going on in the country, I think that, uh, I think we might have to do more lives.
I think we want it live and in person.
Thought Prime Live Presidential Forum.
Hey, there's going to be some interesting things we're going out.
I saw President Trump last night.
Jack, I know you've seen him recently.
He looked great.
He's got great spirit, vitality.
He's in this thing to win.
And to his great credit, he's coming to our event.
And we'll see if any other candidates decide to show up.
Andrew, closing thoughts as we wrap this up.
Wait, hold on.
We have the deep web reveal.
For those uninitiated, the deep web reveal is The Deep Web Reveal is the time of the show where you have to be a total nerd to have picked this up online, and hopefully we do our research.
Now, this one is not so deep that you have to be a total nerd.
I think it's fair enough to say you don't have to be a total nerd to have picked this up.
It started as that.
It started as a Deep Web Reveal, like a 4chan thing, but it's blossoming.
So, Blake, why don't you take the Deep Web Reveal?
All right.
Our deep web reveal for this week is the shopping cart test.
And I believe it literally did start on 4chan around 2020.
It might be older than that.
But the idea is that you basically can kind of have a yes or no test on whether someone is a salvageable member of society, of our human civilization, based on how they handle shopping carts.
And the idea is go to a grocery store.
You have these shopping carts.
And you use the shopping cart, you fill it up, you buy your stuff, you take it to your car.
And then there is a simple test.
Do you return the shopping cart to the little thingamabob that you put them in?
Because it's super easy to do.
It takes, you know, 20 seconds to do it.
No one's going to make you do it.
We're not going to fine you if you don't do it.
Nothing really bad will happen to you if you don't.
But basically, it's a pro-social thing to do.
If you do it, you're not just leaving a grocery cart occupying a parking spot or clogging up the lot or whatever.
So the question is, do you return it?
And this is like a yes or no question on whether you are a good or bad member of society, as the original meme put it.
And this has blown up on Twitter in the last couple weeks for some reason, as these things do.
So is this a correct measure of civilization?
I was going to say, the writing of the original 4chan is so good.
It says, you must return the shopping cart out of the goodness of your own heart.
No one will punish you for not returning the shopping cart.
No one will fine you or kill you for not returning the shopping cart.
You gain nothing by returning the shopping cart.
Yet you must return the shopping cart because it is the right thing to do.
Because it is correct.
A person who is unable to do this is no better than an animal.
An absolute savage who can only be made to do what is right by threatening them with a law and the force that stands behind it.
Alright, so we actually have I don't actually know this guy's name, but I've seen his videos from Barstool.
We have this clip.
Why don't we go ahead and we'll throw it up and then we can react to it.
Returning your shopping cart tests is way overblown.
I think that's crazy the people that think that determines whether you're a good person or not Yeah, I think is it's like it Yes, it determines whether or not you like I think it determines if you go the extra mile for other people I don't think it determines like anything, you know, I won't date somebody.
I won't talk to someone that is so overblown But that's I that doesn't bother me one bit.
I don't think that's like I mean, I wouldn't actually.
Yeah, just when I see the guy like collecting him and it's like he grabs him from the thing and then he grabs one over there.
I'm like, I don't even think he cares.
Yeah, I don't even think the guy who you think you're affecting cares, let alone random people.
The bar stool man must be given many bonus holes.
Bar drool spurts.
The bar drool.
Yeah, by the way, Barstool became super cucky recently, right?
Didn't they do something that Was really bad.
They let go of that really funny fat guy.
Right, Brian?
Because he said the N-word or something?
I liked that guy.
It's so ridiculous.
It's like one of those song lyric situations.
Even the pizza man didn't like that.
What's his name again?
Oh, Portnoy.
Yeah.
He didn't even like that the fat guy got fired.
So, yeah.
Yep, Barstool.
Barstool, in a lot of ways, so, and Jack actually knows this better than I do, but Barstool has come to represent, like, the guys that, like, you think are on your team, like, you think we're all in this together, and then Barstool, like, the minute the going gets tough, Barstool guys, Barstool bros, Barstool conservatives, they just, like, completely cuck out.
So it's like, on the one hand, do we have stuff in common with them?
Can we get on board with certain takes?
Whatever.
At the end of the day, they're all social progressive.
At the end of the day, that's just the way it is.
And they will cut out again.
Yeah, they're trying to push the whole like fiscal, conservative, social, liberal kind of space where they'll come in.
And I think a lot of people during the covid lockdowns started to give them a view.
And they were going on Fox News all the time and were raising money for small businesses, which, you know, obviously we all support and we thought that was great.
But then they bring people in through this and then through sports, et cetera.
And they say, hey, we're this is dude culture.
This is bro culture.
But then suddenly they'll sit there and go, hey, you know, I have a problem with abortion.
Why you guys?
Well, you guys got a problem with abortion.
What are you anti women now?
And then, you know, it's the same exact type of mindset that'll put you in a place where you're saying, oh, what do you guys get a problem with the drag queens?
Well, you think you think there's a problem with the drag queens?
Well, you think the drag queens are a threat to you?
Well, the drag queens aren't a threat to you.
And they will sit there.
I looked at the drag queen.
She was she was kind of hot.
Yeah, I know.
People that make those takes, they should be out of public discourse.
No, but how many of these people actually have families that say this stuff?
I mean, very few.
I don't think these people... They seem like the kind of guys who make comedy videos about their vasectomy.
Yeah, I mean, it's just... I've no... I mean, apparently they've gone the woke way.
Dave Portnoy went out and he was like, oh, you fire the fat guy and, you know, it's gonna be the end of the company.
Yeah, well, there you go.
Because they're owned by a casino.
I didn't want to do it.
They did it.
No, you're right, Charlie.
Right.
That's right.
That's right.
So what the problem with Barstool is they got bought out for like six hundred million dollars, which good for them, you know, hats off.
But now they got to they got to comply with all of this ESG stuff.
They got to comply with the corporate governance.
So, you know, at the end of the day, their hands are tied.
There's only so far they can go.
Yeah, they can make some like kind of bro comments about pizza and about, you know, joke videos about women, whatever.
But at the end of the day, they're they're never going to be by your side when they go and get stuff.
And I think that's the that's the bottom line.
I mean, and so so I'm going to take that guy's comment and I'm just going to put it over here in my mental box and say, you know what?
You're probably just like you're corporate approved.
You're like kind of funny and edgy to a line, but you know where the line is and you're never going to cross it.
All right.
Well, you know, you're no use to me then.
That's how I look.
I know.
I just think I also don't need And this is just me.
Maybe you guys disagree.
There was a period of time in my life where I enjoyed sports commentary.
I have no desire to consume that content anymore.
I mean, I will watch college football and maybe a little NFL, but are you guys in a stage of your life where you actually enjoy people talking about sports as if it's really that complex?
And it needs.
I feel like I lost it.
I feel like I lost it to Charlie when ESPN went well.
I agree.
I used to love the Scott Van Pelt and Stuart Scott and.
You know, all this, the kind of the making sports really fun and different edits and making fun of bad is, you know, I thought that was really an exciting development in sports as someone who loves the actual magic of, you know, sports and competition and the pursuit of excellence.
Now I just, I, I turn on ESPN and it's like MSNBC with a, with a basketball and like every other host is either lesbian or black.
And it's like, okay, great.
Okay, fine.
You weren't a fan of the Jameel Hill power hour?
No, it's, it's, I find, I don't know.
I personally, I find people talking about sports to no longer be interesting to me.
Maybe it's just because I've gotten older and it used to be a thing in high school, but I don't know.
Maybe you guys disagree.
Do you remember when they fired Rush for what he said about Donovan McNabb?
Did they fire Rush?
They did.
He was on... I don't remember if it was ESPN or a different network, but he said that... What did he say?
He said that they were pushing Donovan McNabb as an NFL star because... I would do a Rush impression, but I can't do it.
But he said he wanted to... the media wanted to see a black quarterback succeed, is what he claimed.
Yeah, exactly.
And his point was that there was a lot of hype behind Donovan McNabb.
And I say this as a lifelong Eagles fan, and I remember the entire Andy Reid, Don McNabb era, that Rush was right about that.
Donovan McNabb was a good quarterback, but he was never a great quarterback and he was never a champion quarterback.
And Rush's entire point was that all the hype that the media was giving him was because they wanted him to be this sort of like, because at the time, and now it's not even necessarily the case.
But at the time, it was like there was this this idea that there was some sort of like, you know, glass ceiling for black quarterbacks and that, you know, there were no champion black quarterbacks that were going on.
And so they're giving this huge push to Donna McMab.
And so Rush was simply explaining and analyzing the situation.
It wasn't commenting on Donna McMab necessarily, other than to say that his football game wasn't that great, which is true.
It is a little weird.
They were like, let's put Rush Limbaugh on sports analysis on.
No, but Rush tried to buy an NFL team.
Like Rush was in the, he was in the mix.
Uh, he was, he loved, I mean, I loved football too.
We did miss out.
We missed out on, like, the Frank Caliendo rush impression from him being an NFL owner, so that was too bad.
No, that's true.
It would have been fun to have him at all the owner meetings.
No, I can do... Let me be clear.
I can do game day, college game day, which I think is one of the great pregame shows.
I think that's really fun when they do that from a college, and I miss it.
I have, like, a countdown to the first college football game.
I can do a little bit, a little bit of the NBC Sunday Night Football, Football Night in America.
Like, a little bit.
And that's about it.
I mean, I just, they start these NFL pregame shows like four hours and they're like, and now our exclusive interview with the right tackle of the Green Bay Packers, you know, like, okay.
And, and, and next, next hour we have the exclusive interview to the backup punter for the Jacksville Jaguars.
How are you preparing for this week?
You're going to disagree with this, but I think the best sports coverage on planet earth is And these are kind of different spectrums of the sports like universe is UFC and golf.
I'm sorry, but like the UFC backstories, they hype me up like on Saturday nights, like I'm ready for the next UFC fight because they do such a good job producing like the conflict.
And I know some of it's put on, but what's that?
It's great.
No, I think UFC is great.
UFC is amazing.
It's an amazing product.
I went to a UFC fight once.
It was unbelievably entertaining.
It's legitimately great.
Golf is a total waste of time.
No, golf is fantastic.
If you play the sport, though.
But I know you and Tucker agree it's a total waste of time.
I kind of agree that it is a waste of time.
Okay, you just agree.
But I like it.
I can't help it.
Why can't they be hype men in golf?
Like, why does it have to be all soporific?
And they're like, he's on the green.
He's got the culture, man.
It's a culture!
I will say this about golf that I think is really admirable.
The mental part of golf is very significant of what these guys have to overcome.
I think it's legit.
I thought you got a million dollars on the line?
The mental part of UFC is pretty high, too.
Like, you get punched in the face and stuff.
No, I mean, but if you said, Charlie, you could watch the Masters or you could watch Division III football of two winless teams, I would say, where's the Division III?
The Masters.
Oh, great.
Now, what about what about the Masters versus the WNBA?
Oh, come on, Charlie, the WNBA is a joke.
OK, like the WNBA.
So you won't say it.
Probably probably the Masters.
I'd probably I'd probably say the Masters.
Thank you.
I had to think about I had to think about.
That's ridiculous.
Shooting layups for two out for an hour.
I'm embarrassed.
Hey, by the way, KC-15 wants us to plug Sound of Freedom.
We had an interview on our show about Sound of Freedom, so we're going to do it.
Sound of Freedom.
Go see it, July 4th.
Go ahead, Charlie, Jack.
No, it's fine.
We're running out of time here, guys, but close it up.
No, I was going to say that, obviously, go see Sound of Freedom, but I was going to say, what if we were able to come up with some sort of forum, maybe as a channel, maybe Rumble could do it, where it's just women's teams versus men's teams the whole time?
Let's make a TV show where it's all-star women's teams versus all-star middle schooler teams in various sports.
And then we try to find what the right, you know, what the right ratio is, basically.
How low can we go?
A team of all-star 5th graders?
How far down?
How about fourth graders?
Ooh.
All right.
Well, look, we are wrapping up.
Mel Gibson, by the way, threw down this morning.
You guys saw that, right, on Sound of Freedom?
No, it was great.
Mel Gibson is not just a blue chip.
He's a triple-A blue chip talent.
I don't think people realize, from Mad Max to Patriot to Braveheart to producing Apocalypto to producing Hackshaw Ridge, I mean, the guy is blue chip, triple-A.
I'll say this, Jack, you guys deserve a lot of credit, you pesky Catholics.
You guys have a couple sleeper cells in Hollywood that might just save us.
Mark Wahlberg and Mel Gibson are proving to be some pretty legit dudes.
They really are.
Eduardo Costegui, who produced the film, out of Mexico.
And it's, what can I say?
You know, what can I say?
We've been in the game a minute, have a lot of takers.
But no winners, no champions.
But look, in all seriousness, folks, this is what I want to throw out there.
And I was going to save this for tomorrow, but I'll say it here since we're on the subject.
I think we need to call this the Sound of Freedom Challenge.
And the Sound of Freedom Challenge is this, that you have to go to your friends and you have to go get your friends to go see Sound of Freedom instead of Indiana Jones, because that also comes out this weekend.
Go see Sound of Freedom and you have to get See who can get the most of their friends, because this is a big part of the Sound of Freedom's marketing pitch, is that it's this pay it forward.
See how many of your friends you can get to say no to Indiana Jones and say yes to Sound of Freedom.
Very good.
All right, everybody, check out the Public Square app again.
They are the sponsor of this show.
Take out your phone and download the Public Square app.
Special thanks to Rumble for broadcasting this conversation.
I will be back live at 12.
You know, Charlie, we're going to have to find new holes.
But if you from two to three go watch Jack's show, I won't penalize you for that.
Jack's show is two to three Eastern.
He does a great job.
And you should subscribe to my podcast.
Subscribe to Human Events Podcast with Jack Posobiec.
Blake, Andrew, Jack, final thoughts, and then we'll wrap it up.
You know, Charlie, we are going to have to find new holes.
New holes to boldly going to holes where no man has gone before.
Thought crime.
Blake. - Blake, do you wanna add on to that Star Trek style? - I share, I share Jack's pro-hole perspective.
I think we should also discover as many holes as possible and make Charlie aware of them.
So, we're a pro-knowledge, pro-hole show.
It's a great Shia LaBeouf movie, by the way.
Alright, my send-off is, it is a great film.
And the book is even better, by the way.
Which film?
Holes.
He likes holes.
It's an excellent... I think it's by Louis Sachar, right?
Louis Sachar, I think.
Sachar is how they say it.
Alright, my sign-off is if you want to date Blake Neff, please email Freedom at CharlieKirk.com.
Freedom at CharlieKirk.com.
High IQ Blake.
He's single, ladies!
He's single.
Jack, me, and Charlie, we're all married.
We're out of the game.
We don't know what holes are.
Apparently, Hunter Biden is a member of sex clubs.
We don't know anything about this, but here's single Blake.
Kill the stream.
Cut the stream now.
Kill the stream now.
Right now.
Hunter Biden, he would be our subject matter expert on the bonus hole.
However, he's invented at least three new holes.
But Blake, if you want to date Blake, email us freedom at charlieburke.com.
I said kill the stream.
Why is the show continuing?
Why is the camera still on?
Charlie, final thought.
If you ever wondered what it would be like if Mr. Clean had a beard, that's Blake.
Great program, everybody.
We are going to be back tomorrow for our shows.
Subscribe to our podcast.
And until next time, hopefully this program does not get memory hold.
See you next week.
Don't cry, he's deaf.
Bright light said it gonna set my soul, gonna set my soul on fire.
Got a whole lot of money that's ready to burn, so get those stakes up higher.
There's a thousand pretty women waiting out there.
