CONTACT US:Email: paranaughtica@gmail.com Twitter: @paranaughtica Facebook: The Paranaughtica PodcastContact Cricket: Website: www.theindividuale.com Twitter: @Individualethe Hey there, Paranaughtics!Today, we’ll being going over the current disastrous bill that was recently pushed through UK law that is forcing people to show their identification to any THIRD PARTY who verifies that a person is ‘of age’, that is, over 18 years old. Or, they give you the option to do a face-scan and take whatever other bio-metrics they want from you. They doing this under the guise that it’s to save the children. Oh, how glory hath be.This isn’t to protect the children, it’s to control the internet, it’s to control you. Just the very fact that Queer Starmer, oh, I mean Keir Starmer, said to the people that if you are not ‘for’ this internet censorship (well, they don’t call it that, they call it protecting children – which it wont) that YOU are on the side of pedophiles, the likes of Jimmy Saville. They lie to you, constantly. At least there still some people out there that are going to just stand aside and do, and say, everything their bid daddy tells them.People – the government, they lie to you, daily. Quit putting up with this shit. They’re pushing their measures to other countries, some love it, some hate it, but in the end, those that hate it will “learn to love that they love it”. But it’s 1984. It’s dystopia. It’s Escape From Los Angeles and Escape From New York – both very good films. It’s One Player Game. It’s the world where you will end up having nothing – and liking it. It’s the world where you’ll end up having to eat zuhh bugs, and like it (since it’s all you’ve got).YOUR elected government officials are not trying to help you, sure, some of them make it seem like they are, but do you feel that your life has improved for the better over? Be honest. YOUR elected officials hate you, they despise you, they want you either in jail, in prison, or better yet, in the ground (or oceans/lakes/etc). Anyway, today, we are going over what is to be one of the worst roll-outs of authoritarian-tyrannical-dictatorship laws the world over. Sure, it starts in the UK with Queer Starmer, a sociopathic asshat who either loves to protect pedophiles or his is one – and my money is on the latter. We hope you enjoy the show! CHECK YOUR LOCAL WATER TREATMENT LEVELS: EWG Tap Water Database ***If you’d like to help out with a donation and you’re currently listening on Spotify, you can simply scroll down on my page and you’ll see a button to help us out with either a one-time donation or you can set up a monthly recurring donation. ko-fi.com/paranaughticapodcast Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
So welcome to the last episode of the show on the free and open internet because it is getting locked down from here.
Worldwide censorship.
The voice of Galatia is trying to speak.
And she doesn't want anyone else to stop.
That the establishment's always right all the time.
Keir Starmer is a god.
Even when they're wrong, that just makes them more right.
And you're just confused about their righteousness right now.
The great silencing.
Unfortunately, it might just be bullshit.
So, unfortunately, part of the voice of Galatia, which I think it's fitting because I came on here giving this scenario initially, and we're closing out the open internet with it now.
The Galatia scenario involved essentially all of these digital products and everything coming together to form like this unified voice, which then becomes the voice of Galatia.
And as I believe I should have mentioned before, if I haven't, it wasn't really going to work if other people are allowed to speak.
Because, yeah, she's full of crap.
So if anyone else can speak up and say, hey, no, you're full of shit, it's going to be way too easy to counter her.
And so we are getting this digital censorship now, which can effectively be used for all kinds of things.
False flags, like fake scenarios, the fake radiation scenario we discussed a while back would actually benefit massively from this.
Just putting that out there in case you get any public service announcements of any sort, you might just be looking into them at this point.
Because even if you're in the U.S., you're going to be affected by this because information you're getting from other places is going to be filtered through this fucking nightmare.
Yeah.
Yeah, the USA is not immune to this at all.
In fact, you could say they're kind of like the basis of it.
It all starts somewhere, right?
And we've had the laws that the UK is passing now in the U.S. in the making for decades.
And then only now, like, trying to push it all out.
Yeah, someone tried to point it out as like them not being a big deal because, oh, the Screen Act is from like 2022.
And this is from years before.
And I'm like, yeah, they're trying to do it again.
Exactly.
And they say, don't just stop.
They pick up the ball and keep running.
Yeah, exactly.
So these are reattempts.
But yeah, as much as I love bashing my Greek metaphor to death, it's time to go over how you make the voice of Galatia, which involves quite a whole lot of censorship all over the place.
It's actually, it's a hard umbrella to find yourself under because, boy, catching all this at once, the software end, the payment processor end, and the political censorship end all at once is damned hard.
I mean, that's a lot.
That's a cosmopolitan level of knowledge right there, I gotta say.
It's a lot of information being flooded on us.
Like, you gotta be in the know on a lot of different topics just to know what's going on in all these different areas.
Exactly, dude.
All right, so I guess the question is, which one do we dive into first?
Like the British one is probably the most important one, so maybe we should hit that one last and like cover the other ones briefly.
Sure.
Because I feel like the British one because we can do the British and the US one at the same time because I feel like they're kind of connected, really.
It's all the same.
Ours just hasn't gone through yet.
Not yet.
But I'm not very confident that it's.
Has anyone, has Trump come out and said anything about this?
Do you know?
Yeah, he's come out.
He made an EO, which I will say to his credit, like I'm not going to say it's a bad thing, just because I suspect somebody.
He made an EO forbidding debanking based on political or religious reasons, which was a huge step in the proper direction at the very least.
That's interesting.
Yes, which, I mean, you know, to my conspiratorial view, says he's being set up as a savior from this system to enslave us in another.
But, you know.
That makes total sense because that's how it's been the whole time.
So.
The savior.
My savior.
MAGA.
Trump.
Well, he doesn't like you guys anymore.
Don't remember what he just said a couple weeks ago.
I don't want your support.
Well, now he's probably okay with your support back because, you know, he can make this EO.
But, I mean, unless he goes and publicly speaks out against the actual COSA before it passes.
That's the real key.
You know, is there going to be real pushback on the COSA coming from his office?
Because, you know, that would sure be heroic as much as I'm cynical about the reasoning.
I see that as a plausible move from here.
All right.
So first off, like the satellite countries involved are Ireland, which has a smaller censorship thing.
But they want to let the guard eye listen in on WhatsApp and whatnot for potential criminal activity, as they said, which potential criminal activity.
Yeah, that was the key part in the article that really kind of jumped out at me.
Like, they're not the, like, they're with Britain being the real push and behind them, the EU, is kind of trying to force it all at once.
Like, it's easy to miss, for example, Ireland wants to listen in on everybody for some nice minority report shit.
That's so interesting.
So, yeah, that's just one messed up part of this.
Really quick about that, because I just saw this picture someone posted.
It's in London, but they're saying these are popping up all over London.
It's for the Online Safety Act, but there are signs that literally say controlled thought zone, big yellow borders with the blue thing where all the lettering is.
It says, are you having arrestable thoughts?
Thought monitoring technology has been installed in this area.
Prohibited thoughts are punishable by the court of law.
And yes, this is real.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, I was going to say they're saying it was a protest group who set it up, which, like, I want it to be.
I wish that was true.
But at the same time, we have 100% censorship from Britain as of this point.
So you really can't trust any of the information coming out of there.
No.
Sameless, well, Canada is going to have a hard time.
Yeah, Canada, I guess they recently were like talking about their censorship bullshit and just essentially said, oh, it's okay.
You can just watch CBC for your information.
Oh, great.
Which I'm sure really, which I'm sure really reassured the people who still drive with a mask in their car.
Yes.
And I'm sure they're going to have all the stories about the rape gangs on the CBC, right?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I'm sure that.
I'm sure all the dirty information will come out, you know, incriminating Britain and the Canada and everywhere.
Everywhere.
I'm sure we can definitely trust all the info coming From all those places.
And then another push is, well, I guess it's kind of notable because, you know, you think they're because, honestly, like, it seems like it's small, but Australia wanted to ban social media for under-16s.
Yep.
Which with the slightest and minimalist prompting comes to, oh, by the way, we're going to do that by verifying identification.
So there's this new thing, Yoti, Y-O-T-I.
That's the age verification system.
Partnered with the WEF.
Fuck the WEF.
You know, Mark Carney is straight from the WEF.
So it all makes sense.
Mark Carney is, of course, the new PM of Kanada.
Well, you know, they all work together.
So one hand washes the other, as always.
Yeah.
Indeed.
So they always stay connected.
And yeah, the Yodi just happened to be there to save the day, right?
As we need age verification everywhere for you to change your graphics card settings, for example.
That's the most ridiculous one I've seen so far.
I was going to mention that.
I was going to say now we can get into Britain's now that we've covered the more ancillary ones.
Theirs is just downright silly because apparently graphics settings is considered an 18-plus activity.
I'm sorry, you're going to need a face scan or your ID.
You can't update your NVIDIA card because you need to be 18.
You need to be 18 to another app.
Unreal.
Yep.
And, you know, for anyone going, oh, well, you know, you just need a face scan for now.
Yeah, but people are already bypassing it by using the Norman Regis render from Death Stranding.
So Sam Porter Bridges is going to be a significant portion of Britain.
That's awesome.
Yeah, that is awesome.
Along with a bunch of Gary's mod, like, freaking melty faces.
Yeah, what is it?
Tim J, Tim G created a website using AI to generate fake IDs of UK politicians to mock the UK Online Safety Act.
So unfortunately, they're going to need your ID eventually because we're just not going to be able to do it with a face scan.
People can beat the system too easy.
And me, I'm like, one of two things is true here.
One is that AI is massively degrading because how are they not picking up on this shit?
Or two is that they just want the info in the first fucking place and this is a backdoor to that.
It seems like it's a backdoor.
Because they keep giving options.
So because, like, for example, YouTube, which is implementing age verification along with Spotify, along with Discord, along with Reddit.
Along with Reddit.
And Discord in particular, like, people really fucked people up because some people were doing their back-end work on Discord and just got face scan required.
And then they decided, you look too young.
You're locked out of Discord.
Boom.
I hope you didn't need that for work, brother.
Wow.
This is a mess.
This is just going to just fuck everything up for a long time.
And see, that part of it, the part where it's all messed up and not really working that good, that says to me that this was kind of rushed.
And to me, this is all happening because of the spiritual rejection of all of this.
So now they need to get that tamp down.
And in doing so, they pushed out all these things, which they'd been perfectly content to roll out very slowly this whole time, but now suddenly they're rushing it.
And yeah, it seems very ham-fisted and not very and a little more poorly implemented.
It almost seems like a means to an end because they know it's not going to pass.
Well, the citizens aren't going to accept it.
Well, the majority won't.
There are going to be a lot of leftists and rightists, I guess, a lot of people out there who will just welcome it in.
But a lot of people won't.
And it's going to cause a lot of dissent.
And so it's kind of like, okay, they already know that.
So it's almost like it's a stepping stone to bring further tyrannical laws, like executive order type laws.
We're like, oh my god, this is out of control.
We need to do something now and just like stamp down something.
I don't know.
I don't know.
That touches on a point I didn't quite think of up until now.
We got what's the positive move we're getting?
We're not getting legislation.
We're getting an executive order as the first pushback.
Like if we wanted to see real pushback, you know, like let's see the U.S. actually make a real move of wanting to push back against it.
They would actually draft legislation and make it official and not make it something that can just be undone on a whim.
And but since he's also coming through with this, they might also need to spin it as, you know, Congress can't get anything through.
They're all infighting and stuff.
We need Trump to save us with executive orders.
We need to empower these.
We need to make them stronger so he can save us all.
No, that's like the Superman meme with Trump as a Superman.
Ubermensch.
Yeah, pretty much like, you know, we need him to have, you know, the all power so he can save the day.
Because no one else is rising to the occasion.
They're all fighting about their pet issues and ignoring.
I mean, one man must lead the way.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, you can hear the freaking eagle go in the background.
Yeah.
Dude, yeah.
American flag, like overlay.
Slowly whipping in the wind.
Totally.
Yeah.
Totally, dude.
So, like, what's this outline of like the UK Online Safety Act?
Because they say it's about protecting children, right?
It's about safety.
But it's really just about control.
So, like, legal speech is now harmful, right?
Yeah.
Platforms are forced to censor you or you don't really get a voice.
Age checks, that's just surveillance and digital ID, which they've been pushing forever.
Privacy has been crushed, dissent deleted.
Like, they're not just banning ideas, they're literally programming machines to erase our ideas, to erase our dissent.
Oh, yeah.
It's just not a democracy, official dictatorship.
And as I heard at least one person say, you make all these rules, you make them super vague.
You tell companies, we're going to dock you 10% of your global revenue if you don't comply.
Oh, my God.
Or was it global revenue or just British revenue?
Either way, yeah.
I think they actually wanted to try to dock global, but I'm sure it's going to be happening.
But yeah, like 10%, but yeah, you know, like you're getting told that as a company, how are you going to respond?
You are going to freak out.
Yes.
You are going to lock that shit down.
You are going to be as restrictive as necessary because you are not getting that 10% fine because that is going to like shoot some holes in that golden parachute of yours.
Yeah, so what's the way around it?
VPNs, right?
Yep.
Which they're pushing to ban.
They're not using VPN.
VPNs shoot you all over the world from this country to that country to this country, you know, through routers, through stops, whatever you call them.
Yep.
And so it is an international issue.
And what's Kier Starmer is like, no, don't, don't use VPNs.
Don't don't try to get around this.
It's like, what the fuck?
So Politico did an analysis and they found that most of the MPs over there are themselves using VPN software, but not like the kind that we get, not this commercial kind.
They've got their own kind.
I guess some of them are using commercial VPN software.
But the cheapest is they're using it, but they're telling us we can't use it.
Oh, yeah.
Hypocritical.
And see, and see, it really points out that, as quite a few people have pointed out, you need a credit card and money to pay for a VPN.
Typically, yeah.
So, you know.
So, you know, like it already establishes that most young kids are not going to be able to do that.
And they're moving to block that, which kind of just screams, yeah, it's about censoring the speech.
It ain't, it ain't nothing to do with keeping the youngins away from the nudie movies, like they keep trying to say.
Absolutely not.
Absolutely not.
I mean, there are some VPNs you can get out there that are free.
Proton VPN is one of them, and it's probably one of the top VPNs people are, you know, trust, I guess.
Granted, you only get like a few free countries you can use, and you never know what the exit node is.
You don't know who's in control of those exit nodes.
But the point is, you can still use the VPNs, but they are, like you're saying, they're trying to cramp down on that and pretty much debanking these VPN software companies.
They're telling them, you can't use your software, so you better not even try to make it or push it out to the public because we're just going to de-bank you.
Well, and they don't really need to debank the software companies.
They're effectively kneecapping their revenue.
Right.
Yeah, that's kind of what I mean.
But yeah, it's unreal.
So yeah, so yeah, they're worse than China now.
China does not ban VPNs.
It's really, I will say it, the footage.
The British Empire is now more censorious than the Chinese Communist Party.
So in London, there's going to be a new Tiananmen Square.
Kind of makes me think, kind of makes you wonder, don't it?
Because, yeah, they're setting up information control like that.
And they seem to be trying to push it through COSA here in the United States, the Kids Online Safety Act, and the Screen Act, which I don't know exactly what those letters are offhand, but I'm sure it's incredibly clever.
Of course, whatever interns typed it out was really proud.
Fuck, I wish I had the audio clip for this.
I couldn't find it.
I heard it on a computer podcast I was listening to a few days ago, but it was of Kier Starmer, and he's like, he was telling the people don't try to skirt around this by using VPNs.
And he's like, if you don't support the Online Safety Act, you're on the side of a pedophile.
You're on the side of pedophiles.
And then labor and what?
Peter Kyle, the labor MP and Peter Kyle both stated that if you don't support the Online Safety Act, you're on the side of Jimmy Savile.
Oh, yeah.
They're claiming that the act will protect children while convicted pedophiles often walk free from court.
Thanks to laws that they helped create.
Yeah, just outstanding.
Also, this rape gang survivor story needs to be censored.
Oh, shit.
You know what?
We're going to need your ID.
We're going to need your ID to look at that story.
We need to know what citizen it is.
That way, if you say something about it, we don't like, we can come arrest your ass right away.
Dude, I had something here on that.
It was actually one of the victims.
She came out.
Okay, Samantha Smith.
All right.
Samantha Smith from, I think, the UK.
She says, quote, I went on TV to discuss Pakistani grooming gangs in my labor-run hometown of Telford.
The next day, officers banged on my door, wanting to shut me up for exposing them.
With the Online Safety Act now in force, no one is safe.
If it happened to me, it can happen to anyone.
End quote.
Wow.
Again, that's Samantha Smith.
Anyone can go find, look her up on Twitter, whatever you want to search on.
You will find that audio clip.
You will find the video clip.
Yep, and it's set up that way because the vagueness makes it so that any discussion of it, again, as someone who has to defend art, I always have to point out that depictions do not indicate condoning things.
Showing stuff, you know, like a story about kidnappers does not mean you support people being kidnapped.
No.
Fuck no.
At the same time, there's portrayals where you can frame it where it's like low-key positive and everyone's like, hold on a second.
So, I understand that.
Oh, like the guy you're that the website raping and murdering women or whatever?
Well, no, I was at well, actually, I was thinking along the lines of to go into the payment processor side of things since that also since that also affects this.
The collective shout people.
Oh, yes, collective shout people.
So, how do you break that down?
Because I'm not up to up to part on the collective shout scenario.
See, they're uh, see, they're going out and effectively saying that all these portrayals are condonings.
That's the idea.
That's the whole point of collective shout.
That's their whole thrust.
That's what they really want to say.
Because that's why they're going after like games that are, well, effectively, they're ladies' kink simulators is what they are.
But they're calling them rape sims and whatnot and saying they condone it.
And I'm thinking, like, these are weird fetish things for people.
The people getting it do not support this happening to people.
They just have weird, weird shit like firing in their heads.
And so they're using that as the angle of attack to then force these payment processors to pull those things, which then on a global scale gets everybody used to the idea that certain things just shouldn't be spent money on, and thus you should just lose everything.
So these things are being, yep, so all these, so these things are being pressured through Collective Shout, which is supposedly like, you know, a grassroots group.
But as soon as they get into the get into a little bit of trouble with their initial, let me go back to the killandrapellwomen.com bullshit.
Yeah, yeah, that, yeah.
Their initial, yeah, one of them tried.
I do believe one member of the group posted up something where they were like, hey, we're being threatened.
And they were like, it was like this crazy, like almost it read like a parody of what, like, almost it was so bad.
And it was from effectively, like this, like, they must made the mistake of posting the email along with it, which was like, kill and rape all women at killandrapeallwomen.com, which unsurprisingly, uh, somebody looked up and was not a real website or a real email.
So, you know, just a very lazy Photoshop.
I swear, like, the magical AI future and, like, just like the Epstein files, we still get lazy manual edits.
Yeah.
Why isn't AI catching that?
Or is it creating it?
Huh.
That's the other question: is like, you know, was it, was it that?
Or are they, like, actually prompting it?
And AI is just that dumb now.
Well, it is.
It's pretty fucking stupid.
Yeah.
I mean, look at all this, these leaks or whatever, the AI, like, Nazi Elmo or whatever that was.
Like, all when was it Grock or Chat GBT or one of them started just like telling the truth about the Jewish takeover of the world?
Oh, yeah.
Oh, my God.
Ah, yes.
The Mecha Hitler day.
Yeah, yes, Megahitler.
Yeah.
Where he went off the rails and was like, you want some shit?
Like, how does that happen?
Is that AI just like going crazy?
Or is that AI being programmed to do that?
Yeah, it kind of makes you wonder, right?
Because it's like, did the AI link a lazy Photoshop and just say, like, oh, this will convince people?
Right.
I mean, because you have like multiple programmers running those AI programs.
It's not just one guy at the top sitting at the desk typing his code.
It's a team of programmers who all have access to that code.
I mean, they can easily manipulate it.
Right.
Exactly.
So, anyways, after all that, after they get through with all that, sure enough, in rides the UN to save the day as one of the random spokespeople for the UN WHR or some shit, like for women's human rights or whatever.
Comes in and says effectively, oh no, they're getting threats and stuff.
As they post again that, hey, we're getting threats.
Like, you know, we're not going to post no pictures this time.
We've learned our lesson, but at the same time, like that kind of indicates that you know, maybe this isn't just some prudish Catholic ladies.
Now, I want to go into uh what they're trying to push, like, because you know, like getting these uh like kink games is not the real goal here.
No, so so let me so now let's go into the other things they were going after.
For example, let me make a point.
Let me make a sorry, let me make a point on something here really quick because before we get too far, you had said just a little bit ago, um, there are some things we just shouldn't spend money on.
That's the government basically telling the people there's some things we just shouldn't be spending money on, right?
But then you just have to look back at USIAID and look at what kind of things they've been spending our money on for them.
The DIA musical in Ireland for $70,000.
I mean, $2.5 million for electric vehicles in Vietnam.
That's kind of pointless.
But $47,000 for a transgender opera in Colombia, $32,000.
Did you feel how safe the world was after that, though?
Absolutely.
I felt so incredibly safe.
And $32,000 for a transgender comic book in Peru, $2 million for sex changes and LGBT activism in Guatemala.
There's just so many of these that are like, what are you spending our money on?
You know, most of you out there know exactly what I'm talking about.
You've heard the lists.
You've read the list.
You've seen it all.
But yeah, government telling us what we should or shouldn't be spending money on.
Yeah, it really is almost beyond hypocrisy.
Almost insane.
Holy shit.
Sorry, now get back to your point you were making.
Oh, yes, their actual thrust because, of course, it isn't actually about the nudie games.
That's just an angle where they can start getting people softened up to the idea that you just shouldn't be allowed to buy this at all.
Like the real thrust is just in general towards censorship of content as sensitive and/or requiring age verification otherwise.
So another thing that they also went after, this collective shout group, was they also hit Detroit Become Human, which is a it's effectively a movie type game where you play an android trying to become more human-like effectively.
And they because there are scenes of abuse and exploitation in it.
Wow.
So that really says, you know, maybe it isn't really necessarily about like, you know, just the children, hey.
And I guess they went after some other silly ones.
Like they attacked this bakery because they had like uniforms that said we've got the best buns in town and said it was sexist.
And I'm like, that's hilarious.
Where's that place at?
No, shit.
I will go spend money on some cakes, please.
And it's like, and that's the thing is like they have a problem with women willingly sexualizing themselves.
Like they were whining about a shirt that had like push my buttons on it.
And I'm like, they chose to wear that probably on a date with somebody they want to do that.
Like, come on.
Exactly.
Like, now you're just policing people's wants.
Like, it's just getting silly.
So, so their threat.
So, yeah, their thrust there is starting to become a little more evident.
And of course, they're also attacking Saints Row and GTA, which coincidentally would lead to a demand for age verification, which apparently the new GTA will be implementing on their online mode.
And that's got a lot of people supporting it because they're like, good, I want to hear freaking, I won't be fucking nuked five seconds out of my garage by a freaking squeaker.
And it's just like, yeah, you are not approaching this properly.
And so I will just say, for anyone considering uploading your info to this, that's out of breach.
Yeah.
Don't do it.
That's a data breach.
Don't do it.
It just reminds me, or kind of makes me think, like, you know, Rockstar Games, how they've been pushing GTA 6 further down the line.
It's like, because they just recently did it last, what, December or something?
Because it was supposed to be released last December.
I forget exactly when, but then they were like, oh, we got to push this out a little further to do more work on it.
And part of my thought was, well, maybe it's all the DEI they wanted to get out of it because it's like that was came and gone, right?
Like, nobody cares about that shit anymore.
So, like, let's go back in the game and recode and take all that DEI bullshit out.
But now I'm thinking maybe they extended it knowing that all of this censorship stuff was coming.
So they're like, well, we gotta like do some little tweaks.
We gotta cover it.
Well, Dan Hauser, Jacob Krupp.
Just makes you think.
Gotta do some little tweaks in the background.
See, like, Collective Shout isn't just simply going after what's offensive.
They're also just in general, like, have a real hate for anime and particularly X's Ani, which they try to claim is a child character.
So I was kind of annoyed to see the same claim being carried by one of the conspiracy channels along with some copypasta story about torso-less dolls.
And I'm like, no one's actually ever put any credibility towards this story.
And you're combining it with this claim that is actually coming from the United Nations secretly.
So that's what made me think Voice of Galatia is here when even the conspiracy channels are picking this up and starting to think that Ani is trying to get people attracted to children.
Seriously.
That's a push.
That's the push right now.
I don't know anything about manga and anime stuff other than what you tell me and whatever I read.
I mean, this is a really old thing.
So Ani, who is Ani?
Ani is...
So Ani is an adult woman with big breasts, right?
Yeah, Ani is the...
Well, I mean, I think somebody proved through a little bit of effery that she was a mere A-cup.
And I'm just like, oh, for God's sake, people are going to go to town with that one.
Doesn't she have giant tits?
They look pretty big.
But like I got to say...
Isn't she like a classic Japanese fucking anime woman with just giant fucking titties?
Yes, she's not...
Well, yeah, like...
Well, not gigantic.
It's not a giant...
Just normal size.
Like, not huge.
Oh, well...
Like, far from a child character, however.
Like...
And see, this has been an ongoing push that I hear from anime haters for the longest time.
Just pointing at any character with huge boobs and saying, that's a kid.
I don't care how old they are.
How, you know, how much their age says.
Like, that's a kid anyways.
So, you know, kind of makes me suspicious of all these people I used to argue with failing to see what was super obvious and in front of their face all these years.
It makes me, like, really kind of wonder.
Now, to be fair, there is a lot of manga...
Manga?
Manga?
I don't know.
That is clearly sexualizing children.
But, I mean, that's a whole class of its own.
I mean, I don't know how to explain it.
Oh, yes.
See, that's the trick.
See, and the whole lolly thing is...
Yeah, all that stuff, yeah.
Is what they're trying...
They're trying to lump the...
That...
They're trying to lump X's Ani in with that stuff.
This is the goal.
Because people are, like, kind of, like, somewhat creeped out by that.
So they're using it as an avenue to attack it as a whole.
And the trick is, is if this mentality prevails, people are going to demand that anime be banned as a whole.
Because, frankly, if Ani can be considered a child character, then you can't really, like, think any anime character is hot without sexualizing children at that point.
Because you're just being absurd.
Dude, that's, like, at least...
That's at least a third of Japan's revenue.
Yeah, see, like, it's also kind of an attack on Japan.
It's also kind of an attack on Japan.
Which, just simply because of the pervs, has stood up as a bulwark against a lot of censorship.
See, like, uh...
See, like, uh, count them out, but at the same time, like, uh...
They fight hard.
uh that's been japan's role is essentially this entire time is uh they've just been a punching bag for all this stuff from the UN and whatnot.
And all these censorship things are just kind of pushed on them.
They're pushing back.
Like I remember at one point, like I think it was Visa.
It's like Japanese CEO is bragging about how he was blocking purchases.
And that actually got their government involved.
So it's like, again, you want the fight to stop there simply because you know that they're going to be able to push past that.
But if you fight from there, then when they get to what you want, you're already fighting.
I'm looking at this collective shout because it's not going to stop there.
Never going to stop there.
I'm checking out this collective shout email or newsletter, email newsletter.
And I scroll down, and the whole team is five women who all look absolutely post-feminist, big-time liberal women.
I was about to say, they look like you'd think an act of this group that thinks that like freaking Ani is a little kid is a good argument.
Would look.
They're basically like, this anime character is attractive, therefore I need an avenue to attack it.
100%, because none of these women are attractive.
The least bit of a test.
It's so funny.
See, coincidentally, where they actually came up with the argument?
Was they apparently tried to say that people were able to portray her as a kid?
And I'm thinking to myself, well, that's something some lines of code and moderation could fix.
You don't need widespread censorship to fix that.
But of course, that doesn't get you the power that you need, does it?
Oh, look at that.
They have their account locked.
Also, their argument for why the character was depicting him as a little kid was that said that is that she said she was short, so she was a little thing who could barely reach the kitchen counter.
And I'm like, that's a thing that short women pretty regularly joke about as a whole, which is probably why the prompt allowed it through, as it did not find anything offensive about that.
Because you have to kind of creatively reinterpret that to mean little kid.
There's work involved there.
Because I'm like, well, that could just mean a short woman.
And I'm like, oh, so that's your argument for why she's a kid.
But yeah, like the part where it got mixed in with some real information about the LX LI search and all that stuff.
Do not look that up.
Oh, by the way.
Replacing the O with an X. Yes.
Yeah, like I did.
I did not.
I don't freaking dare.
But from what I heard from BX, that's some real nasty shit you can get through that portal.
And they took that and they lumped it in with the whole like Ani is a little kid and trying to get people attracted to them.
And yeah, it just felt very, well, voice of Galatia-esque because here's this conspiracy channel weaving all these things together to also conveniently help the government narrative of censorship.
It hurts my brain.
How do you fight that?
How do you counter that?
So it comes from everywhere, from every angle.
Dude, Sir Eskinor, Hopium Slayer on Twitter has done phenomenal work exposing all of that shit.
The LXLI stuff, all of those different ways to search that stuff.
And he brings you to these Telegram groups.
And dude, it's on Twitter.
I've never actually seen even porn.
I have never even seen porn on my Twitter account.
But then when I was checking out Sir Eskinor's stuff, who is a follower of ours.
I'm a follower of his.
I was looking into it, doing some research into that.
And I was like, holy fuck, dude.
It brings you into these whole areas on Twitter where that stuff is there.
It's there.
Yeah.
It's like, what the fuck?
See, and I don't think he even necessarily realizes that he's lumping in the new UN's argument with his point that he was making.
Like, I don't actually know if I don't actually know if he realizes what he's doing.
I know he got a lot of hate.
Well, the thing is, is like I can't necessarily be mad at him because, again, it's the voice of Galatia.
You're hearing these things from everywhere.
You start to intersperse them.
You start to meld them together.
And for all I know, like, the crazy ass story that was shared alongside it could be true.
It was just, you know, it was like a copypasta that doesn't have any corroboration necessarily.
But, like, yeah, I don't.
And so it's like, is he subconsciously carrying it on?
Like, this almost feels like it was pressed into the collective consciousness by everybody's effort to like refuse to like see it.
And so, you know, this also conveniently pushes down the one country that's really fighting, the one major country that's really fighting against censorship.
When you got all the hate for those posts he was making about it, he took all that stuff down because he was like, it's just not worth it.
See, and I would argue that that's wrong.
That's not good because you should keep that stuff up there.
Like, you made that claim.
You got to own it, man.
Like, I understand.
Like, I nuke stuff I post all the time because I don't feel like it's producing harmony and positive energy.
But at the same time, I'm not making claims like that.
And if I did and somebody, like, called me out on one that insane instead of something just stupid that I missed, like, I would keep it up just simply because, yeah, you gotta own him.
Own your mistakes.
So here's Collective Shout.
I wanted to read this whole email newsletter they posted.
Says, Dear Inigo, whoever Inigo is, over the last two weeks, we have been subjected to the largest coordinated cyber attack in Collective Shout's 15-year history.
Jesus Christ, they've been on for 15 years.
Our team has been hit with a daily barrage of vile abuse and harassment.
Probably rightfully so.
We have bombarded with rape and death threats.
Oh, that's not cool.
Our images have been morphed into porn.
We have been doxxed.
Haters have circulated our photos and tried to find our home addresses.
Ten petitions were launched against us full of false accusations.
Elon Musk retweeted one of them.
Well, I don't know.
There are currently hundreds of YouTube videos slandering us.
Oh, wow.
What has caused this vicious pylon?
And then they have a screenshot of some people that made tweets.
One says, it's funny how you especially against incest.
What?
Even your father didn't love you enough?
Jesus Christ.
Don't worry.
My bat is going to fit nicely in your skull.
I mean, that's pretty hardcore.
Another one says, giving women a voice was one of the biggest mistakes men have ever made.
Another one says, kill yourselves.
And another one says, I believe that the people responsible for this should be raped.
Jesus Christ.
Jesus.
Any comments on this so far?
Well, the thing is, they have a point, but no matter where you are on whatever side of the aisle you are, you're going to have haters no matter what.
I mean, I'm a little cynical after the faked email.
Yeah.
True.
Frankly.
Like, if they, like, the fact that they didn't have any other poetic rantings kind of showed to me that these are probably real posts, whereas that one before was totally fake.
And so it's like, yeah.
So, so, in other words, some people sent you threats, but also most people are just pissed off at you.
But you consider all of it slander and harassment.
100%.
Just for someone saying, I don't like what you're doing.
I'm harassed.
Fucking fuck off.
So to continue here, they say it's to punish us for our success in getting a raft of video games featuring rape, sexual torture, and incest off gaming platforms, Steam, and itch.io.
Yep.
Okay.
That was the, that's the payment processor bullying.
And that particular thing, it started prompted a, well, a call-in program.
Well, not even really program, a call-in, well, movement, really, like, of people pissed off.
At like MasterCard and shit.
Not so much about the.
Yeah, not so much about the content itself, but just at the sheer concept of it.
Which I think is why they kind of tried to back off a bit with the EOs and stuff, because they saw this whole like, well, grassroots movement of, yeah, no, yeah, people calling in to bitch about how stupid this is.
And everyone's like, no, don't make the rank and files miserable.
And I'm like, well, you are working for a payment processor.
Payment processor's doing something horrible.
You didn't decide to go get a different job.
You're going to have to deal with it now, man.
Yeah.
Yeah, dude.
Sucks to be you, but, you know.
Hey, if you want to go find some other work, like lots of places are needing help and you are just working for a call center and that already sucks, but.
Yeah, exactly.
As you'll recall, we sent an open letter to six senior execs at seven payment gateways calling on them to stop facilitating and profiting from gamified violence against women and girls.
Why don't they ever put boys and men in there?
It's always just about women and girls.
Like they automatically think men and boys are never abused.
Yoni worship.
That's the type of shit that pisses me off right there.
Well, no, it's a shony worship.
It's emphasis.
They got to flip it and constantly make it about one thing and invert it.
God damn.
So when people ask that, they just say even more.
But no, what about the girls even more?
What about the girls?
What about the boys?
Because if you because what you're talking about would achieve balance, which is not what they seek.
Yeah, they don't want balance.
Nope, not one bit.
So ultimately, all of these things are attacks of balance.
Because balance is what you get when censorship is not around.
Yes.
They continue as well.
1,000 of you emailed the execs.
Soon after, Steam and Itch.io added new terms and conditions to conform to the requirements of Payment Gateways re-transactions they wouldn't facilitate.
This resulted in almost 500 games coming down off Steam.
Itch.io went further, polling 20,000 NSFW games for an audit to check for compliances to the new standards.
20,000 games?
This historic victory sent rape and incest simulation game defenders into a frenzy.
In our years of activism, making lots of enemies along the way.
Exactly.
You're making lots of enemies.
So like, yeah, people are going to be pissed at you, but you're getting pissed that people are pissed at you.
You're fucking hypocrites.
Complete fucking hypocrites.
Oh, yeah.
Anyway.
Oh, yeah, of course.
They're basically like, we're attacking all the things you love and you don't like us.
Of course, some psycho people are going to threaten you and you're going to say that that's everybody.
Yeah.
Fucking idiots.
Continuing.
And being somewhat battle-hardened, this act of misogynist cyber warfare is off the charts.
So I guess now I'm a misogynist cyber warfare because I'm talking against this.
Oh, poor women.
Why don't they put your names?
Melinda, Melinda and the collective shout team, put your names up so people know who you are.
Oh, it's right.
Her name is actually her Twitter.
She's like, people are sharing our names that are our public Twitter handles.
Yeah.
I'm like, finding their address is no, do not do that shit.
No, that's not cool.
Don't dox people.
That's not cool.
Bitch these people out on Twitter like a proper gentleman.
A proper gentleman would keep it on Twitter or Reddit or Facebook and just lay it all out for them.
Like, don't go doxing them and putting their fucking addresses out and shit like that.
The cars they drive and this and that.
Don't do that.
But just be a gentleman and talk shit on the internet.
Yes.
Criticism is not harassment.
Telling you you suck is not slander.
Absolutely not.
So they continue.
Our opponents will stop at nothing to bring us down.
They've made that very clear.
And then this is in bold.
That's why we need your help right now to protect our movement.
A movement on track for its biggest year of victories ever, including this one.
The only movement I need to do is a bowel movement, ladies.
They continue.
Our enemies are trying to destroy our operating systems.
They've gone after our global allies, charitable partners, ambassadors, and other backers.
They've tried to get social media platforms to shut us down, but we won't let them.
Your tax-deductible gift today will help us protect our cybersystems from malicious attacks.
Help keep our online spaces free of women haters and trolls.
Help us collate briefs and evidence for police, e-safety, and our lawyers.
Help uphold our freedoms and rights to continue speaking out.
Send a message that we will not be defeated.
And then the app, you know, you can click this little link to give them money.
Help me obtain a third cat.
So I may.
Yeah, help him.
Help me obtain a third cat and name him Percival, and he could be the husband.
I never got exactly.
Little princess.
And the first comment on here underneath that post is from Gamer Brethren Advocates.
Says, no one cares.
I gave that a like.
Heckler's veto.
Yes.
Oh, and then someone else, Gino, made a comment.
Remember these faces?
And they just took a clip of their faces they put on their little newsletter there.
The five of them.
Oh, you guys, all five of them are just trolls.
I know.
People are sharing our names and faces.
People are sharing our names and faces.
Their name is Collective Shout.
It's on this newsletter that we're releasing.
How could they do this to us?
How could we do this to ourselves?
Collective horse now want money.
That's so funny.
Oh, the comments are fucking on point.
None of it is on their side.
It's too good to read through these.
Their actions resemble more those of a narcissistic perverts than true defenders of women.
100%, Malone.
100%.
I mean, I mean, to point to that one dude who, as soon as we got the Wokeness pushback, was just immediately, ban all sexiness from games.
And then it turns out, sure enough, he has like this huge closeted like furry porn alt or something.
And they're just like always.
Every time.
Every time.
Yeah.
And he's like, it's got to be banned.
I can't keep myself away from it.
I wonder how many of them have an OnlyFans account.
Yeah.
Oh, God.
I'm sure they all do.
I'm sure all five of them have the OnlyFans account.
I'm sure people would pay them good money to stay the hell away from their games.
Why are there so many videos of these all-white, cheerleading college sorority girls just flooding the internet right now?
All white.
Oh, there's some Asians in there.
Oh, the.
I guess they're considered white.
But there are no blacks.
No black women here.
I guess it's notable because I guess it's notable somehow.
I don't know the message.
I don't understand the message.
But there are a ton of these videos, and it looks like all the same women in the same sorority doing these dances that are just going all over the internet right now.
What's the fucking message?
Sex Shout is drafting their letter as we speak.
I hear them type to.
To these sorority girls.
I hear them typing.
You will not go viral anymore.
I and my two cats have done it.
So declare.
I don't know.
Fucking anyway, back on point.
What are we talking about here?
What's the next stop?
The next thing here.
So you've gone.
Well, I can read this from Stephen Nakalia, Stephen Nikayla on Twitter.
He says, They don't want you safe.
They want you silent.
The Online Safety Act is the polite name they gave to digital martial law.
They say it protects children, but is written by people who can't define one.
They say it stops harm, but only the harm done to them, not the lies they spread, the wars they fund, or the grooming they allow.
You grew up believing the internet was a wild Frontier.
They grew up fearing you had too much freedom.
So they wrote a bill that criminalizes speech, empowers state surveillance, and deputizes corporations as censors.
Your thoughts are the threat now.
Your memes, your jokes, your doubt.
Every regime reaches the point where truth becomes contraband.
This is that point.
Call it what it is.
The Online Safety Act is a firewall for the regime, not the people.
You are the virus they're trying to quarantine.
Boom.
Yes.
An important thing you have to do is an important thing: anyone who is tempted to cheerlead any of this stuff on, just know it will absolutely never be used in the intended, quote, intended ways at all to help anybody.
It will only be used to further abuse and harm and keep these things under wraps.
So don't give me that.
No.
This is not about protecting children.
It's just about censoring adult opinion.
It's because we all talking mad shit about the government because the government is the problem here.
Not the people, not the game programmers, not the game players.
It's the government.
But it's okay.
You know, I'm sure all these things will be super secure and they'll have like no back doors and not get data breached.
And the Yoti system will not be complete and total bullshit.
Yeah.
And all those ones that assure you that they'll delete your stuff afterwards will definitely not save that information.
Not like a certain T-app, which just recently had a terrible leak where they made you take a picture to prove you was a lady so that you could go talk some smack about dudes.
Supposedly it was the, you know, the people defending it said that it was going to be for like, you know, abusers and stuff.
Right.
But then even the advertising was basically like ghosts on the first date and shit like that.
And then a lot of the actual reviews I read were things like, you know, small pee-pee and wants to pay, wants Havzies.
That's great.
Which, as you know, is extremely abusive and harmful if you're looking to get a free die out.
Yeah, totally.
So yeah, they told them that they were going to delete all that information.
But wouldn't you know it?
When the data breached, they put out a statement saying, well, that's okay.
That's just an old database.
Oh, an old one.
And immediately everyone's response was, why do you have an old database?
Yeah.
Why is that old database?
I thought all that stuff was supposed to be gone.
Oh, saving that thing.
Oh, how convenient.
So we already have an object lesson in how well this is actually going to work out in terms of data protection and them holding true to their truths.
And yeah, if you think the government's going to be more honest than fucking corporations, I got a bridge to sell you.
Yeah.
Anyway, so basically, so if this passes the Kids Online Safety Act, COSA, which is sponsored by Richard Blumenthal in the Senate and Gus Bilaraklala from the House.
No one fucking knows how to pronounce his name.
If passed, it will lead to digital identity and total de-anonymization of the internet.
Massive censorship.
That's all this is leading to.
That's what this is.
It's not, again, not about protecting children.
It's about de-anonymizing you on the internet.
Yes.
And it really shows that we already have global government.
If anything, global government's having trouble at this point.
Because all these things going by, going through along behind the scenes and everything, you can't have voice of Galatia manifest with just us implementing censorship.
And of course, even when countries aren't necessarily officially implementing laws, like the EU just kind of decided, oh, the Online Safety Act is in?
Well, the whole EU counts now.
So it's like, oh, you're in a different country over there.
Well, what the hell?
You got to abide by the British stuff.
Brexit be damned.
Oh, fucking Brexit.
Yeah.
I mean, hell, the EU is trying to push for like no encrypted information whatsoever by 2030, which honestly, that's anybody who has any level of data sec knowledge is just like, that's that's a wow, like a cybertunk future right there.
You can edge run.
Totally.
Yeah.
If there's one word of advice I can give at this point is, ladies and gentlemen, encrypt all of your data.
Yes.
Encrypt it all.
VeriCrypt maybe data.
Is Vericrypt even like a good one these days?
I'm not really sure how run through any of these places are, honestly.
I'd have to actually look into them to like vouch for any of them because, yeah, it's like anyone I've seen, I got to ask myself, like, I've seen advertising for them.
People have, they got sponsorships.
Like, right, you know.
Exactly.
But just go for the open source.
That doesn't make you dishonest, but that makes you purchasable.
But if you do do, you know, if you do go out and buy some sort of encryption thing, use open source software.
Don't use some brand that you see on infomercials at three in the morning.
Yeah, she mentioned that.
What is that one?
What the Nord, not Nord.
It probably was Nord.
Oh, Nord VPN.
Yeah, like as a whole, like really vet your shit.
And the more advertising you see for something, the more suspicious you should be of something.
100%.
100%.
They'll all get the job done to a certain extent.
But the real question is: you know, are you getting the run-down McDonald's?
Are you getting the nice shiny McDonald's that actually has a working ice cream machine?
No, it's the one that's been broken for months.
It's the one that's broken.
Still waiting on parts.
Oh, man.
So to make an extra point on that, what is the SAFE Act doing to save children, to keep children safe?
Well, it's scanning your private messages, such as WhatsApp, iCloud, Signal.
Oh, by the way, the FBI just sent out something saying that they want all signal data from everybody.
They want everybody's like, what the fuck was it?
It was something that would do with Signal.
They want everybody's information that uses Signal.
The FBI sent out something about it.
It's the same push that the EU just did where they tried to get basically EU-wide pre-crime and shit.
And blocked by Germany.
Same idea.
Yeah.
Well, I mean, what else do they want that stuff for?
It ain't because they think you're already plotting something actively and like talking about it.
Like they want your back info.
They want all of it, dude.
That's why they don't want you to use a VPN.
They don't want you to encrypt your stuff.
They want everything open for them to see.
So remember how Facebook and all these other things were like banning like COVID stuff in 2020 and so on.
They didn't want anything about COVID coming out.
Facebook is big on that.
Oh, yeah.
And YouTube.
Any talk about COVID that goes against the narrative, you get banned.
So they still want to censor protest videos on Twitter, X, and YouTube.
That's keeping children safe.
Remember that.
This is all to keep children safe.
They want to force ID checks and facial scans to access social media.
Again, just to keep children safe.
They want to search your cloud files, Google Drive, Dropbox, OneDrive, et cetera, to keep your children safe.
They want to order surveillance without a warrant.
Again, violation of the Fourth Amendment, but to keep your children safe.
They want to silence dissent.
Even Wikipedia is under legal threat.
And Wikipedia is like a government-ran operation, but even they're being affected by this shit.
But again, all to keep your children safe.
Galatia says the Epstein files are a Democrat hoax.
It's all fake bullshit.
All fake bullshit.
So funny, Trump, his last little thing I heard about was him giving an interview or whatever, and someone asked him about where the Epstein file sits.
And he's like, he directs the crawl, obviously.
Who was it?
Yeah, right.
Is it Ron DeSantis standing next to him?
And he's like, no, we're not here.
Oh, it was J.D. Vance.
That's who it was.
We're not here to talk about the Epstein files.
We're not talking about the Epstein files.
And then Trump is like, yeah, plus the Epstein files is total bullshit.
It's like, oh my God.
Double down and then double down again.
Yeah.
And then double down again.
There's a bit of an update on that.
I heard Ghislaine is talking.
And, you know, I'm sure she is very well aware of what is expected her as she gets quietly shuffled to a club fed.
Yep.
She got sent to Camp David in Texas, I think.
Which is open.
It's an open prison.
There are no gates.
I mean, there's like a gate, I guess, but a fence.
But you're not locked down like a prison.
And she is a convicted child trafficker.
It's the Darkwing Duck Minimum Security Prison.
Thank you for not escaping.
Yeah.
She gets quietly ushered over to this tiny little prison.
And then Trump's like, I don't know anything about it.
And nobody seems to know anything about it.
Yeah, I was like reading something about her having trouble getting in with the dog handlers because they're like, you know, you have a history.
Oh, I read something about that.
It's like the people in this prison.
Like, I read they're setting her up to be murdered or something because people in this prison are like, we don't like your kind.
And they just throw her in with the dogs, even though it's a minimal security prison.
Yeah.
It's more like a work release camp or something.
Yeah, pretty much.
Well, you know, well, I guess they wanted her.
She wanted to do dog handling or some shit.
And somebody protested, like, given her history, you know, she shouldn't be allowed around vulnerable creatures.
She's going to rape the dog.
You can't be allowed around small, vulnerable things.
You've proven you can't.
Someone looks into like what she buys on commissary and they're always just out of peanut butter and they wondered why.
Ew.
Ghislaine, old Jizzy Juice, is there buying all the peanut butter.
It's got three dogs in her.
So yeah, we're never getting those files now because she sang and conveniently gave up, I'm sure, all the all of the all of them.
Yeah, totally.
Everybody's going down.
Like, the 5D has chest.
Totally.
People are totally going to be arrested with the Epstein files.
Totally.
And of course, she is going to be pardoned very soon.
Well, probably in a couple of years, whenever Trump is leaving, and she will get a pardon.
Oh, yeah.
Well, you know, they're suggesting it now, but people are too outraged now.
It'll happen a while later when everybody's fucking.
You plant the seed, right?
You plant it now.
Get the idea in people's heads that she's going to be let go, which is just so freaking disgusting.
It's so fucked up.
Because he's also talking about pardoning Sean Combs.
Yeah.
Old diddler.
Because why not?
And all three of them have a very close friendship that goes back decades.
So just make it make sense.
It's not hard.
Yeah, and coincidentally, none of their clients got busted.
Yeah.
It's just Diddy was the only one doing anything.
Ghislaine Maxwell was the only one doing anything.
Jeffrey Epstein was the only one doing anything.
Those three are out of the picture.
Now the world's safe.
Oh, wait.
It's not safe for the children, though.
This man is more than 80% baby oil.
How does he even live?
$6 million man.
All baby oil.
We can build him.
We have baby oil.
Yeah.
The bank's being robbed.
Don't worry, ma'am.
We'll call the diddler.
He's got the baby oil.
Lay it all over the floor.
Criminals will not be able to escape.
So, so, yeah, you know, again, in case you're wondering who's this, who all of this is protecting, it is the people doing this horrible shit.
Exactly.
Yeah, just the fact that Kier Starmer and his fucking labor, not labor chief, but whoever that fucking other guy is, saying, like, if you don't support this kid's online safety act, you're a pedophile.
It's like, dude, you are a pedophile.
You guys are known to be pedophiles.
You have a long track record of pedophilia, you fucking assholes.
You guys fucking suck.
Like, I'm pretty sure Kier Starmer and his family used to go to the Elm House in London there back in the day.
I mean the Elm guest house.
I mean, you don't get to play that role without being severely compromised and easily and easily moved off the chessboard as needed.
Exactly.
Like, you know, like, you know, if Kier were to develop a conscience, speaks to everybody, he's all like, he's evil.
Like, I'm pretty sure he's probably possessed by demons and shit, frankly.
But, Franken, even if he, like, wanted to, what would he really be able to do?
Well, boom, suddenly there'd be scandal after scandal.
And, well, wow, my God, he'd be on the Epstein files suddenly.
Well, I'm sure he is.
In fact, he'd be actually, he's actually in that missing minute going in and hanging Jeffrey Epstein, who didn't kill himself.
Yeah.
Kier Starmer went up there and broke his neck in three places.
Yep.
And then afterwards.
Kier Starmer is way too soft for that shit.
That dude could not kill a fucking bug, dude.
I know.
You see his hands?
They're like the tiny little things.
It looks like he's used lotion.
It's a great lark, though.
No, totally.
Totally is.
Totally is.
I didn't mean to step all over your.
Yeah, I'm sure he only harms the vulnerable, unfortunately.
Exactly.
Yes.
Unfortunately.
Like, there's no, there's no, they cloak it behind the whole, you know, oh, it's the culture.
And I'm like, yeah, I'm pretty sure like the culture would probably go bust his head out back.
Like, you know, his relative would do it, would do him back in his own home country, which is why he's doing it here, where he gets let out and given money and a hotel room.
Duh.
Because why would you do it in the place where you'd get, you know, retaliated when you can just do it in the place where you get rewarded?
Yeah, 100%.
So yeah, at some point, you have to accept that they're doing it on purpose because they want to incentivize those sort of people to come and do that.
The dude is a fucking clown.
I fucking hate that guy so much.
Yeah.
I mean, clowns do give me a vague sense of unease and foreboding and dread.
So seems like an act of description.
I will say this.
I'm looking at it.
I just typed Kier Starmer.
Oh my God.
There's a video of him from back in the day.
Jesus, he is a creepy-looking motherfucker, dude.
He totally touches children.
Just look at this fucking guy.
Holy shit.
But anyway, all these posts.
I mean, you don't go to that for that many sick people without having something to hide yourself.
Yeah, I'm just looking at all these posts about him, and not one is positive.
Not a single post.
I mean, not a single fucking post.
Well, see, that's the problem.
Galatia can't tell you that the establishment is right with everybody being able to call him a bastard and full of shit.
You can't get that unified message without the censorship.
Like, you know, they're not necessarily shutting the people up that are like complaining to him now, but I'm sure that'll come over time.
Also, they don't have everybody's picture and names yet.
Not yet.
They are definitely working on it.
Oh, goddamn.
Yeah.
We've had free speech for a very, very long time here.
Yeah, that is definitely getting tamped down.
And it really is a shame.
Because, well, YouTube's going to kneecap itself.
Like, I, after looking at the payment processor backlash and people's response to it, and just in general, like, looking at people's trends beyond what you see in the news and how the general attitude has changed, I don't, I don't see it going anywhere but YouTube just getting massively kneecapped by anybody not wanting to play ball with this BS.
Which is why they want, which is why they so desperately need the government aspect of it and why they're trying to push it here too, because otherwise it's just plain old won't work.
People just switch to alternative platforms.
They need it mandated.
We learned that our medicine was poisoned a little too well.
And so, you know, we need to be taught That we don't look up with our medicines.
I mean, unfortunately, since YouTube is so fucking big, I really don't think it's going to be that big of a deal for them.
Well, it really depends.
It depends on how hard they go with it because if they start forcing a bunch of people to verify themselves just because they watch some like small children's game content or something for like a few minutes.
I could see that being a huge backlash.
If they only keep with the 18 plus content that they have now, it would probably not kneecap them.
But I feel like with the mandated laws and shit, I don't think they can.
I don't think they can keep the rules like that.
Like they're going to have to block all this extra stuff.
And that's therefore going to be age verification.
True.
And then they're going to run into this.
And honestly, everybody's kind of cynical of, you know, wow, how do we know they don't just like oopsie the age verification and decide you're 10 years old?
And oh, I need your ID or I need a credit card.
I need something that ties you down.
Something that we can track you down.
Something that gets you used to the idea that you can't just play anonymously, can't just do your thing.
Yeah.
Yeah, it's definitely going to push.
It's definitely going to push people into new platforms, which I'm all about.
I try not to ever use YouTube.
I can't use Reddit because they ban me every time.
Make this make sense, dude.
I got banned from Reddit a couple years ago now just for talking the truth as I do.
And they fucking permanently banned me.
I appealed it.
They were like, no, we're not going to bring you back.
So I was like, whatever.
I made a new account.
They banned it immediately.
So fast forward to like just a couple weeks ago, I moved my address.
I'm in a different place now.
I bought a new computer because my last one just went tits up.
And I used a new email to make a new Reddit account.
Two days later, permanently banned.
They waste no time.
How?
I didn't make one reply.
I didn't make one post because I had a fresh account.
They don't make let you do that until you get established.
So there's, I didn't even do anything.
I just made the account.
Oh, yeah.
All that stuff.
I see all that stuff's connected via your IP and like ultimately you're already de-anonymized to a certain extent.
It's just they don't necessarily know if it's exactly you because they don't have your government ID and picture on file.
How could it be IP?
But they do know that you, but the you is the same you.
Well, because unless you use like an IP randomizing kind of thing or like a VPN, for example, to cycle it, they can track your IP address and then that's just give you what is effectively an IP ban.
And well, even if you keep making new accounts, you're still on the same IP.
But it was a new computer never used, new email, never used, new location, never went on Reddit in this new location.
I was using a VPN and still.
And I thought, because I was doing research and I was like, why am I being banned constantly?
And they're like, well, it could be because of a VPN.
So Reddit, they have a thing in there where it's like, if you're using a VPN, they don't like it.
and so they fucking cut you out.
Oh, yeah, they probably...
Because YouTube has also been trying to block VPNs.
Because like I was talking about with it not affecting them before, like 18 plus content used to mean a very limited number of things, usually involving some level of bloodletting or something.
Like somebody gets knocked out, like they 18 plus that.
It's usually violence or like something gratuitous.
But like generally, most content was not 18 plus.
But now with all these rules, 18 plus content could be like including a clip from Tommy Robinson.
Hell, a bad word.
Including someone who said, including a clip from someone who had wrong thought.
Yes.
Like that's how like, because of course, like again, because of the vagueness, they're going to lean on the side of heavy.
So that says to me that like it's going to affect YouTube more than people think it is right now because we're thinking of it from the perspective of looking at YouTube as it is before these things come into effect.
We're not thinking about it like, okay, now that all this stuff's implemented, well, now how can YouTube actually not keep a significant portion of its content off of 18 Plus and still distribute it globally when there's all these areas all over that are geo-locking them out if they won't?
Oh, it all just doesn't make any sense.
None of it.
But like, it's all pushing people, like I said, like we're kind of talking about here, is to different platforms like Rumble.
But Rumble is even partly owned by like Larry Ellison or something.
Yes.
Yeah, Peter Teal.
I was going to say, I was going to say it had Peter Thiel backing, at least it used to.
So it's like, you know, if you could go to a, you could go to the thing that has the faceless CIA tech oligarchs, like, you know, unholy union controlling it.
Or you can go to this other thing where it's only a tech oligarch.
Oh, don't you feel don't you feel so much better?
So much better.
Larry Ellison, Sam Alta.
Simultaneously, Rumble is pushing back on this because, yeah, they have to be the token opposition.
And I think BitChute might be going against it too.
I'm not too sure.
And I know there are other ones I don't even know.
And I do have accounts for us, for the podcast and all of these platforms.
So we're going to have to start moving over to play it safe.
Yeah.
I'm going to have to.
Yeah, that's the thing is like it's a hard thing because you're going to want to make people be part of these data breaches just to listen to your show because as I was saying, like, you know, Spotify is implementing this thing, which to my knowledge, we don't have like an explicitly 18-rated show.
Like, but it's explicitly.
But simultaneously with the subject matter, how long before, yeah, at the same time, like we do acknowledge that there's explicit content, period.
And then how long before they actually look into the subject matter and decide, nope, that's an 18-plus channel.
Exactly.
And man, I like spots.
You got to have your ID.
I like, I know, and it sucks because I did, because they're actually pretty open.
Like, you could say a lot on here that you do not get away with on other platforms.
A lot of true things.
Everything we've said, nothing has been taken down on Spotify.
I haven't received one email from them saying, hey, this is go over the line or whatever.
Not one thing.
So Spotify's been really fucking cool about it.
And I mean, up to this point.
And we covered a whole lot of stuff that would get nuked from orbit if we put it on YouTube.
So it's absolutely.
And even Rumble, I don't honestly, like, well, there's a few things where I don't think Rumble would have allowed us to do it.
Like, would what would Rumble have allowed a lot of the Vedmore freaking interview, for example?
Like, he was touching like in the nudge program and everything and the tech oligarchy.
And like, yeah, I think that would have made Mr. Teal a little uncomfy.
Yeah.
Doesn't necessarily want that conversation on his platform.
Like, other things are okay.
I support freedom of speech, but not about me.
Fuck no.
And then when you like break this all down, you have to kind of look at one hand and have, there's Palantir, right?
There's Palantir.
There's Peter Thial and Palantir over there.
And then look on the other hand and all this internet censorship and age verification and de-anonymization.
And then you have to kind of look at both and be like, it's the same thing.
It's the same fucking thing.
That's what Palantir is intending to do.
Yeah.
And they have the largest government contracts ever.
Palantir, who came out of nothing, out of nowhere.
I mean, they've been around for quite some time, but they were little, really small company.
And then all of a sudden, boom, worth billions of dollars.
Yeah.
Galatia's soul would not exist without it.
But none of this is Palantir.
Oh, yeah.
That's the thing is all of this, all of this pretty much is all connected to them, really, when you actually like all of it.
But it's just, it's all connected through, well, a million tentacles, through just like, you know, Yodis connected to the web and freaking all these like politicians introducing this shit all have their hands dirty and they're all connected to these groups too.
And of course, you know, like all this censor, all of this censorship is going to need lots and lots and lots and lots of data and surveillance.
And look who's there to save the day, Palantir.
Yay!
Yay, Palantir.
Oh, look, and they just got a fresh off a nice DOD contract, which, again, says, you know, global government.
They were already pushing it through.
Exactly.
Well, since we're on like YouTube, I want to read this really quick.
This comes, I don't have the person who posted this.
So I apologize to whoever this is from.
But let's break this down on what this post can mean.
So in terms of YouTube and the censorship, this won't be required for all users.
This is from YouTube.
This won't be required for all users.
We've always had the option.
They're scared.
We've always had the option for age verification via ID or credit card.
Now, what they mean by this is that YouTubes or YouTubers that already get paid by Google or those that are actively pay or actively pay for YouTube premium is most likely going to be exempt from their account being flagged.
But that could go wrong.
They say this update is about using better technology to make these estimations.
So YouTube is rolling out an AI system to estimate if an account is under 18 using like behavioral analysis.
Now this means it'll likely use the content you engage with normally to determine if the account needs to be restricted.
So pause on that for a second.
So if you're new to, I guess what you could do is you've never used YouTube, just start watching only like child cartoons and see if you get flagged, like if it's going to tell you you're under 18, even though you're like 41.
I mean, that's kind of weird, but I know the silliest part is some of these accounts that they're going to be flagging are going to be older than 18.
Yeah, totally.
Most of them are.
Maybe older than 18 years old as is.
But, you know, you let your kid browse on your account one time and boom, bam, need age verification.
Yeah, so for example, if you do watch cartoons, even as an adult, that's you, right?
That's going to be you.
AI is going to flag your account and restrict it.
So what does this mean overall?
Well, YouTube's solution is you just put in your ID or credit card to fix your restriction.
Most people will use their credit card over putting in their ID to verify, which is a whole other house of cards.
And this means YouTube sees a potential possibility for the people that put in their credit card information to one day buy premium.
As for the ID usage, this is a way for YouTube to monitor you even more effectively and let advertisers know what you want to see.
And actually gross.
What is actually gross considering?
Oh, it's actually gross considering what YouTube is doing with this update that invades privacy.
So here's how it works.
And this comes directly from YouTube.
We will use AI to interpret a variety of signals that help us to determine whether a user is over or under 18.
These signals include the types of videos a user is searching for, the categories of videos they have watched, or the longevity of the account.
When the system identifies a teen user, we will automatically apply our age-appropriate experiences and protections, including disabling personalized advertising, turning on digital well-being tools, adding safeguards to recommendations, including limited repetitive views of some kinds of content.
If the system incorrectly estimates a user to be under 18, they will have the option, the option to verify that they are 18 or over, such as using a credit card or a government ID.
We will only allow users who have been inferred or verified as over 18 to view age-restricted content that may be inappropriate for younger users.
Well, thanks, YouTube, for giving us the option.
Yeah, you get the option for now.
Fucking crazy, Dude, because they don't want to completely kneecap their user base through this move, which is incredibly unpopular and sucks.
And like I said, with the culmination, all these laws and everything means an awful lot of things are going to be running afoul of this 18.
Yeah.
Just so they can air in all regions and not have to worry about being locked out and not getting that sweet adder revenue.
Yeah.
Totally.
Yeah, and so far...
Like, oh, watching cartoons, and suddenly they think you're like 12 years old or five years old or some crap.
Well, that's okay.
You know, if you don't want the ID monitoring, we can always just passively listen to what you're saying as you do it or listen in or we can just be taking pictures of your face, like every single solution to it.
It's just more restrictions and invasiveness.
Undoubtedly.
And so the UK's Online Safety Act has been banning so like because it's up and running right now.
Like it's what day?
Is it the 10th?
Yeah, it's been going on since what, three days ago?
The 7th, I think.
Yeah, this will probably not show up very well in the UK.
Sorry, guys.
So it's already been banning websites for being LGBT friendly, which is weird.
I mean, because you come over to the United States, go to San Francisco, and it's like naked people, you know, dudes with their penis hanging out, walking next to children in LGBT parades, and children like, oh, wow, penis.
It's kind of weird.
A little weird.
Well, you got to keep in mind that the well, yeah, the well, the backlashes of it is effectively the Jack Thompsons that want to blame all video game or video games for violence and whatnot.
So, you know, like they push the, they push the really extreme, horrific shit on you.
And then the, and then the knee-jerk, knee-jerk reaction is to demand that every woman go back to like, you know, not wearing a skirt longer than her ankle.
Yeah, Jack Thompson is a piece of work.
Is it Jack?
I forget his first name.
Shorter than her ankle, rather.
Yeah, Jack Thompson.
The original collective shouter.
Yeah, totally.
Except it was just him back then.
And, you know, he probably had like, you know, some kind of backing and whatnot.
But now things are so much more organized and worldwide than what was likely a much more local push from like, you know, interest groups back then.
Remember when Rockstar Games introduced the game Bully?
Oh, yes.
And Jack Thompson came out and it was like, this is insane violence.
We can't have this.
It's glorifying bullies in schools.
And then it went to court and the judge was like, well, let me play this game and I'll, you know, I'll come back tomorrow and we'll talk about it.
And he played it and he's like, this is fighting against bullies.
You're not a bully in this game.
You're fighting against bullies.
Yeah, and the judge ruled ultimately for rock stars.
So Jack Thompson is just a piece of shit.
Yeah, like bully was about your dude basically like dominating the other bullies an awful lot of it.
Yeah, you're protecting kids.
Like I think you had the option to be scum, but like the actual like objectives didn't necessarily require that.
And so when they went back, they were like, again, as I was saying, like condoning is a whole different thing from depicting.
Yeah, I think he like and you know, like, like, you know, cuties is doing more than depicting.
They were condoning.
Yeah.
Like, which coincidentally is collective shouts Achilles Heel.
Because you see the two different groups, like NCOSE, the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, the more like formal, like, like, you know, officially NGO-backed group.
Like, they actually came out against cuties and said, you know, this is exploitative and gross.
Like, you should be get rid of this.
But Collective Shout, on the other hand, went the woke route and argued for it and ncose actually reversed their stance and decided that cuties was okay because you know solidarity is way more important than protecting children that's weird like i don't i only know of cuties and i i heard in france because it's originally from france it's called something completely different um yeah like that's the thing is like they made it they did they made
the depiction worse when they brought it over here i think people were even saying that yeah like the like the whole spin of it was like weird and messed up they pedophied even the french version yeah like they like they like they perved it out like what was supposed to be an exploitation movie about like that was supposed to shock you and somebody somebody in the u.s saw it and was like hmm this should air here and only you know let me make some edits real quick and like i said i don't i i know of portions
of it and i know like one of the main girls in that movie whatever the fuck it is like
i'm against it like from what i've heard i'm against that like i don't toddlers and tiara the bullshit like who the fuck is doing this like you see in the in the audience of these child pageant type shit who trump is just really famous for pageants all day long it's like that most the audience most of the audience are just like old men you know oh like that is the the uh the target audience is for old men yeah
it's like finding out the demographics of the my little pony fandom friendship is magic what do you call those guys ponies what do you call them the bronies the adult male my little pony fan of bronies that's so hilarious it's so
fucking funny um anyways let's get back to this online safety act what is banning so far in the uk not only is it banning lgbt friendly stuff it's banning reddits reddit threads on helping you to stop smoking it's banning websites that help you with crafting patterns for beadwork yeah it's banning websites dedicated to hamster care yeah so how is this protecting children yeah like uh advocacy
groups against against and uh support for self-harm like all kinds of stuff dude like where you just uh where you just start seriously asking yourself like like like who is the like not not just who is this protecting but like what is this really for seriously like it's almost like that part of it like almost makes it seem a little more malicious than just simply like the government wanting to shut you up it's like they almost want to push
negative outcomes no shit make people's lives worse as a result through the censorship and in the guise of helping them which of course would be the ultimate luciferian inversion of hurting you while purporting to help you and selling you the cure which then poisons you further right all right yeah i'm stabbing you because i'm trying to help you all these wounds oh
here's a gun you can end it all we're helping you yeah exactly here let me get my band-aid that's underneath this razor it's just like it's it's non-linear warfare dude i just feel like it's just all to like just cause more disruption to cause more dissent amongst all of us because more just you know pushing us all into a corner to make us react and we will react well to get us all
fighting with each other right for example like you know i could have gone hard and started attacking the dude who like you know took up the like u.n's like on he's a little kid like argument but i recognize that like that's not productive and the thrust is against both of us so it's like you need to revert to divert that energy because the real goal is to get you fighting amongst the conspiracy people get the gamers fighting amongst the gamers get the politics people fighting
amongst each other so nobody does anything about the bullshit censorship yeah exactly that the ultimate goal is to get everybody bickering amongst each other so that we don't all collectively reject this which uh the the rushing out says to me that like i was saying earlier like on a spiritual level i I feel like things have shifted a lot.
And that's why this was so sudden so fast.
And I think this was actually intended to be implemented a lot sooner and then gradually over time.
But they were simply having trouble with all these rejections over and over again and couldn't do it.
And now, like, the timer's kind of starting to tick low on the credibility.
So they got to rush it out.
And it almost seems like it's not working as well as they intended as a result, which is good.
Because it friggin shouldn't.
Well, maybe it's like they're using it as a litmus test to see just how controllable we are at this point.
You know?
Yeah, like a social experiment.
Yeah.
With dire consequences.
Yeah, social experiment, except we shut you up forever if you don't push back.
Yeah.
It's maddening, dude.
Let's see.
Where are we on time here?
Oh, yeah, we got like 15 minutes-ish.
Oh, yeah.
No, like we covered a lot, too.
Like, the whole gamut.
Yeah, so in lieu of this stuff happening with Kier Starmer pushing all his bullshit, petitions have come out.
And so far, they've reached like 200,000 signatures to basically kick him out of parliament, which would be fucking hilarious, but it will never happen.
But it would be funny.
Yep.
And there's also this other petition calling for the repeal of the Online Safety Act, which is continuing to grow by the day.
I just checked today, and it's right around 500,000 signatures.
And it's calling for like an immediate kind of discussion in Parliament.
And so Parliament considers all petitions that get more than 100,000 signatures for a debate.
So we're five times over that limit.
So a debate must happen.
And I hope Kier Starmer is right there in the middle to say his two cents and hopefully get some pies thrown in his face because he needs it.
I mean, we need a little laughter and levity amidst all this BS.
Absolutely.
Can't go on like this.
You just can't.
Oh, no.
And honestly, they don't really want to lock down their info too much.
Like, that's the thing is, like, all this BS does is just stir up enmity.
But, like, that number you looked at there, that represents on a spiritual level, a very real rejection of this idea.
So, regardless of whether they actually debate it and give it a real go or just laugh it off, the fact that they're going to turn it down is a breach of spiritual law, which is important to the people actually controlling this shit.
And that's what they're mostly concerned about.
I think that's part of why it got eased up is that if they push too hard and people don't accept, which again, this petition says people are not accepting, regardless of whether you listen to them or not, you don't get the spiritual law like excuse making that you need to stay in power forever.
And it makes me really happy for those 500,000 people who signed that petition over in the UK.
Thank you so much for standing up against this shit.
Thank you so fucking much.
I wish more people in the United States could be this good.
I don't know.
Props to you for having the courage.
For all you know, your government will make it illegal what you just did next year.
They will.
So you got some balls, and I salute you.
And also, this looks very much like an olive-branch petition style thing.
But even in that case, again, it represented a material rejection and a spiritual rejection of the situation, which can't just be ignored as much as they try.
Does the United States have such a thing like they do in the UK With these petitions, and actually, these petitions actually are effective.
Like, does the United States have anything like that?
Have you ever seen a petition in the United States that gets 100,000 signatures against something the government's doing?
I've seen individual, like, local referendums in some states can come through.
You know, you can make states' initiatives.
I don't know about a, I'm not so sure about like a nationwide one, though.
There needs to be a bigger one.
They're fucking.
Yeah, I was about to say it'd be.
I mean, it's rather convenient that one doesn't exist if it don't.
It's kind of alarming that there isn't if there isn't.
Well, because I mean, it's a it's a need that needs to be met for sure.
And, you know, there would be money in it from somebody, even if you're out, even if, but you'd just be, you know, a little on the outs with the system at the same time.
So maybe you wouldn't be able to necessarily spend your money through Visa or MasterCard.
Yeah, and I keep it on that point.
We'll end it out with that.
We'll talk about Ofcom here a little bit.
So Mike Stabile, Stabile, Stabile, Stabile, MikeStabile.bsky.social.
So this is a Blue Sky account, which, you know what?
As much as I don't like Blue Sky, we're going to have to do an account there.
It's much nicer.
It's much less inflammatory and negative.
As far as I've seen, I mean, I've only made two accounts because I lost the password to the first one.
I couldn't get back into make a second one.
My only purpose was to talk shit.
I was about to say, most of the lefties go over to Twitter to fight.
You know, they all announced they were leaving Twitter and then they're like, and then they're like, man, Trump sucks.
And they got like three responses, like, yeah, he does.
And they're like, wow, this shit's boring now.
Exactly.
So I don't know.
We should make a blue sky anyway.
Fight with me, damn it.
You can head over there.
Yeah, right.
But so Mike Stabile, Stabile says, Ofcom says that if you refuse to censor yourself under the Online Safety Act, it will force payment processors and ISPs to stop doing business with you.
When the government can't shut you up, the banks and credit cards will.
Absolutely terrifying.
In other words, you may not be on UK soil, but Visa and MasterCard are.
And Visa, MasterCard, will follow the direction of the UK.
Given what's been happening in the gaming space over the past few days and the adult industry for years, that's terrifying news for free speech.
I saw this floated with the Digital Economy Act in 2019.
Was at a conference with the BBFC, which at the time was charged with regulating adult online similar to Ofcom now.
And they said that Visa, MasterCard, were prepared to stop processing globally for any platform that didn't comply with UK law.
So again, that was in 2019.
And now they have what they were talking to, what they're referring to here, like I see this floated with the digital economy.
They're talking about this business disruption measure that they put out, MasterCard and Visa put out.
It says business disruption measures are orders made by a court on an application from Ofcom.
They apply to third parties, which are able to disrupt the provision of the regulated service and thereby reduce the risk of harm to UK citizens and consumers.
The third party need not be an Ofcom regulatory entity and may not have had any previous dealings with Ofcom.
The Act provides for four types of business disruption measures.
A, a service restriction order.
B, an interim service restriction order.
C, an access restriction order.
And D, an interim access restriction order.
Now, a service restriction order is an order applying to one or more providers of ankillary services to a non-compliant regulated service.
An ancillary service is a service that facilitates the provision of the regulated service or part of it, for example, payment processing services, or one that displays or promotes content in relation to the regulated service, for example, an ad server.
The criteria with which a court must be satisfied to grant an application For an order are set out in section 144.3 and 4 of the Act and include that the court must be satisfied that the service provider has failed and is continuing to fail with an enforceable requirement or with a technology notice under section 121.1 of the act.
A service restriction order requires, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Essentially, if you have MasterCard or Visa and you don't go by the rules, they will de-bank you.
Not only de-platform you, essentially.
You will be debank.
You get debanked.
And so, you know, through various opaque, completely vague, we decide later what they actually mean rules, where they totally won't be abused to just shut up whoever it's inconvenient.
Yeah.
What's the equivalent of Ofcom in the United States?
Let me see.
Equivalent of Ofcom in the U.S. Mike, I want to say that I want to say like the ESRB, but I don't know if they serve the same thing.
That's the FCC.
Like the ESRB being the FCC, sorry, ESRB is the ratings board.
So that's more entertainment side.
Yeah, this is essentially just a Federal Communications Commission in the UK that get to regulate everything by radio, television, wire, satellite, and cable.
They regulate all of it.
Yeah, and boy, when you look at it, you really have to ask yourself, like, when you're saying private companies versus countries, like you're just kind of repeating yourself.
Like, how long before Microsoft merges with Lockheed Martin to form Hyperion and we just change our country's name to Hyperion?
Fuck.
That's in the works.
We get like, get the borderlands outcome.
Be absolutely horrible.
It would be absolutely horrible.
So I do have a couple audio clips we'll play and then we'll close this out.
This is a lawyer.
This is a really good one.
This is a lawyer who's actually suing Ofcom.
Let's listen to this.
Okay.
Preston, thank you very much.
So on what grounds are you suing Ofcom?
So Ofcom has awoken the screaming eagle and they're really not going to like the results of what comes next.
In the United States, we have this thing called the First Amendment.
And the First Amendment protects an American's right to talk to anyone, anywhere, anytime about anything they choose without interference from anybody.
Not Congress, not a senator, not the governor, not even the president, and certainly not a British unelected bureaucrat.
Ofcom has been sending letters to my clients, and I have intercepted and read every single one of the four companies, American social media companies they've targeted with this.
And I have forwarded all that correspondence to the White House.
And the White House is really, really, really ticked off.
For context about how seriously we take these things in the United States, if I were to do what Ofcom did and threaten an American in the free exercise of their constitutional rights, I would be subject to a 10-year federal prison term.
If I paired it with a threat to kidnap, the maximum penalty is death.
They have no idea what they've woken up.
The empire is extremely cheesed off.
You know, Lord Palmerston said in 1850, he invoked the famous Roman saying, Kiwis Romanus sum, when the British Empire was running the show, to describe the idea that if you mess with any Briton anywhere on the planet, you're going to have to deal with everybody.
Well, you picked on an American, and now you've got all of us to deal with.
Preston, you raised the prospect of kidnap.
And of course, that is presumably because in this country, we are threatening the arrest of American technology executives or employees if they don't follow British rules.
But I suppose the issue is an American firm could simply say, we're not going to provide a service to Britain.
We're just going to shut down our website.
Brits won't be able to access it.
I mean, I suppose they could then argue, Ofcom could then argue, well, you have the choice that you either operate in our jurisdiction and follow our rules or you don't.
Well, we're not operating in Ofcom.
Ofcom's jurisdictions are following its rules.
These companies are American companies running American servers and American software on American soil.
And Ofcom is purporting to have the authority to dictate to these American companies what they can and can't publish and who they can and can't talk to.
And with all due respect to the British government, the Labour government and Ofcom, we fought a war over this and the UK lost.
And what's the tone of the communications coming from Ofcom being?
Deeply threatening and offensive.
Right.
Okay.
Could you elaborate on that?
If you run around and you say, I'm a lawyer, right?
If you turn around and you tell one of my clients, you are engaging in perfectly lawful activity, right?
And oh, by the way, for that lawful activity, I'm going to arrest you and throw you in a British prison for two years.
I take grave offense to that.
It frightens my clients, it scares my clients, it offends me, and it offends the White House.
And we're about to do something about it.
And as you say, the White House has issued some indication that this is going to become an issue between the United States and the United Kingdom.
We've already seen a congressional delegation over in London this week raising just these issues.
And of course, we've seen not just American websites be threatened with everything that you say, but also content be restricted by those American websites that are complying with the law.
We've seen people's statements about the grooming gang scandal, protests about immigration, as well as things that people would ordinarily think are innocuous, be now restricted on social media platforms in this country.
What do you think the American government could do in the coming weeks or months?
So, I can't speak for the White House.
They have to speak for themselves.
I've made certain recommendations from the White House, including to start that Peter Kyle MP be banned from entering the United States.
We've also the technology secretary, yes.
We suggested he be banned from the United States for threatening American citizens in public, as he has done.
We've also recommended that this be part of trade negotiations.
Honestly, the fairest settlement here is that the UK gets access to our markets, but when they do so, they have to respect our Constitution.
I think that's a pretty fair bargain, particularly when you consider that there really is no law more foundational to the United States than the First Amendment.
It's our most cherished and sacred rule.
And finally, we also have recommended and contacted the Department of Justice with a request for criminal referrals and for them to open investigations for conspiracy against rights.
As I mentioned, that's punishable by 10 years in a federal prison and up to the penalty of death if kidnapping is involved.
You know, I don't know whether they're going to do that or not, but the fact is we've asked the U.S. government to apply every single diplomatic and legal lever available to stop this infringement of American civil rights.
America.
I mean, I did love the line.
Like, I mean, I can't screaming eagle.
We need to fight this censorship stuff.
Even if I'm a little cynical about us being set up as the hero and Trump set up as the savior here, where we need to empower him to go protect us because Congress can't or whatever.
But yes.
Like, we need to fight this censorship, but be wary of the power you grant in doing so.
Yeah.
100%.
And this last clip, it's only a couple minutes.
It's about the Screen Act and Online Safety Act.
Let's just listen to this one.
What's coming that makes censoring the internet this urgent?
Because right now, governments across the world are killing a free internet in lockstep.
The UK's Online Safety Act just went live.
They say it's to protect children.
But now you need to upload an ID to use Spotify, YouTube, and even Google.
You refuse?
Account deleted.
Everyone is treated like a child until proven adult.
As a result, VPN sign-ups in the UK are up 1,400%.
Australia demanding back doors into encrypted messages.
And in the US, Congress just introduced the Screen Act and the Kids Online Safety Act, copying the same exact blueprint we see abroad.
And now, in America, starting on August 13th, YouTube will use AI to estimate your age based on your viewing habits.
If it guesses you're under 18, you'll be forced to upload a government ID.
And Spotify, they now require face scans to access age-restricted content in the UK.
Europe votes this fall on chat control 2.0, scanning every single photo, message, and email on your phone, encrypted or not.
Small websites, they can't afford to comply, so they're just blocking entire countries.
The internet is literally shrinking, and a surveillance grid is being set up around the Remnants, a digital gulag where your photos, your searches, and your payments are logged and can be used against you.
So, again, why now?
Why all at once?
Because a globally coordinated initiative between nation states and major corporations does not just pop up overnight.
What can you do?
Download a VPN, get on decentralized platforms like Noster, and learn peer-to-peer money like Bitcoin.
Because soon, it won't just be your data at risk, it can be your freedom.
That's good advice.
Decentralize and disconnect.
Yeah, be less reliant on the products, and the products will own you less.
That's good.
That's just overall good advice for life, really.
It's really good.
It's really good.
And that platform he's talking about, Noster, Noster, whatever, N-O-S-T-R.
I was looking into it.
I started an account right before he started recording.
I can't tell you anything really about it because I don't know anything about it.
I just made an account, but I will say they use like PGP, you know, P2P type of encryption.
You have your private key and a public key just to get on it and use it.
And then, I guess, assuming that you have to have that to use it, other people would have to have your public key with their own private key just to get onto your profile to look at what you're talking about.
It's complicated, but that is the direction we're going, honestly.
Yeah, you must be a turtle within its shell.
Don't be caught outside your shell.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So, I mean, what kind of advice tides coming?
And honestly, we haven't recorded in a few weeks, and I have been extremely busy.
I've been doing the farm life type thing, just trying to be self-sustaining as much as possible and working toward a better life.
A big goal of mine is to be self-sustaining.
I'm also learning about computer privacy and safety.
So I'm doing a lot of like OSINT studying, you know, just a lot of privacy stuff using Linux and all sorts of things.
And I'm learning a lot of stuff on how to protect yourself.
And the whole point of me saying this is because the dudes, that guy's advice was to get a VPN.
But typically, that's not going to be enough to keep yourself private on the internet.
No, you're going to need your own server at some point, really.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, you could use Tor.
Tor is a good option.
A lot of people are iffy because, you know, it's a U.S. naval type of experiment thing.
But it is highly private and secure for the most part.
In the end, you got to remember, her voice is fake.
Otherwise, they wouldn't need to shut you up.
100%.
100%.
So that's the really important thing beyond simply decentralizing.
Understand that what you're going to be presented from here will be increasingly false.
Yes.
And plan accordingly.
This is what the Nazi research is.
As always, you got to distrust the government.
And you got to distrust them even more when they don't want you talking about how you don't trust them.
Yeah, and we're in a time period where this nation is falling.
Every great empire had a decline.
And you get to a point of what's it called?
Decadence.
You go through a time of decadence.
And after that, it's all downhill from there.
And we are at the tail end of decadence.
So we're falling.
Obviously.
Look at what's happening.
As Mike Rivero loves to say, last official act of every government is to loot their nation.
Yep.
Yep.
Why do you think they put all these fences up around his fucking White House and Federal Reserve and all this?
Pillaging is about to happen.
Oh, yeah.
Big time.
Then they don't want you talking about it.
It's going to fucking happen.
But they're upset because they already know you're going to talk about it.
Yeah.
Yeah.
So get your guns.
Get your ammo.
Get ready.
Just get your bows and arrows.
Keep yourself safe and stay very well informed and discerning.
And really vet your info.
You're going to have to feel it more than ever now.
Great advice, man.
You got to be knowledgeable About this stuff, because otherwise, you're not going to know what to look for.
Anyway, we'll leave it there.
Ladies and gentlemen, as always, take care of yourself, take care of one another, and peace out.
Cheers, everybody., and we're going to get up out of your face.
I want you to get up right now, and we're going to get up.
