CONTACT US: Email: paranaughtica@gmail.com Twitter: @paranaughtica Facebook: The Paranaughtica PodcastContact Cricket: Website: www.theindividuale.com Twitter: @Individualethe Ladies and Gentlemen, Hello and Welcome.Today, we are covering PART 2 of our two-part series on DARPA and the tyrannical nonsense they put every one of us through. DARPA is behind pretty much every mind control operation through the use of electronics – from radio, to television, to soundwaves to frequencies – and they’re never going to stop because the leaders who are supposed to keep OUR best interests in mind really don’t keep our best interests in mind but rather keep the interests of ‘their’ leaders at the forefront of everything....especially if it violates the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. They are basically the CIA, the NSA, the DoD, the FBI, the office of HHS, the DoJ, and every other agency that is regularly a threat to us – the people – but see us as their “adversaries”. This is not a joke. That is in their writing. They literally see us as their “adversaries”......And now, as Palentir has been given the greenlight to further spy and collect every individuals data, it’s pretty clear that it is a DARPA offshoot. Facebook is DARPA, Twitter is DARPA, all social media is a project of DARPA.With that said, let’s buckle up, velcrow up, and somersault into this lurid topic. To check out a small batch of Coops’ music, go to this this link — https://on.soundcloud.com/Q1XRaY9WSpzawV9r7 CHECK YOUR LOCAL WATER TREATMENT LEVELS: EWG Tap Water Database ***If you’d like to help out with a donation and you’re currently listening on Spotify, you can simply scroll down on my page and you’ll see a button to help us out with either a one-time donation or you can set up a monthly recurring donation. ko-fi.com/paranaughticapodcast Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
We see part of that technology today as the Lavender AI system, which assigns Palestinians a numerical score of 1 to 100 based on how likely they are of being an enemy.
It has a 10% error rate, which has been acceptable for Israel.
and Palantir.
...getting wealthy off of killing Palestinians.
Palantir kills Palestinians with their AI and technology.
Oh.
...killing my family in Palestine.
Do you want to hear my answer?
So the primary source of death in Palestine is the fact that Hamas has realized that there are millions and millions of useful idiots.
that will...
Mostly terrorists.
So what do you think about the use of artificial intelligence or lavender by the IDF in identifying Hamas targets?
Look, I'm not, you know, without going into all the details, you know, I'm not, you know, I'm not on top of all the details of what's going on in Israel because my bias is to defer to Israel.
It's not for us to second-guess everything.
And I believe that broadly the IDF gets to decide what it wants to do and that they're broadly in the right.
And along with the Lavender system, there is the Habsora AI system.
Which means the gospel, which is an AI tool created to address the human issue of running out of targets.
Hubsora generates up to 100 targets per day.
Both these AI systems use Palantir's advanced surveillance technology to track every person's phone records, social media, and movement patterns.
Palantir's tech is used by the US military and local police departments.
It is the premier tool for mass surveillance.
When running for his first term, Trump was saying he would implement a biometric tracking system.
We will finally complete the biometric entry exit visa tracking system, which we need desperately.
We will ensure that this system is in place.
And I will tell you, it will be on land.
It will be on sea.
It will be in air.
We will have a proper tracking system.
Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel donated $1.25 million to that campaign, and he donated $15 million to J.D. Vance's 2022 Ohio Senate campaign.
Palantir has significant ties to the CIA, starting in 2004, when the CIA's venture capital arm, In-Q-Tel, Palantir is the CIA's surveillance tool.
And now, Palantir is to create a system for the federal government that will monitor every American under an AI system, linking Social Security and The IRS and immigration into one centralized system.
It will be using its Gotham software developed by the CIA to track and condition human behavior.
Most of yesterday's alternative media support this.
For those who can still think clearly, this is as dystopian as it gets.
But there are many fools who are content that the fascist society being put into place will not be woke.
But don't be surprised if it comes with a carbon tax and an American version of a social credit system.
Greg Reese reporting.
Isn't technology wonderful?
I tell people it keeps getting worse.
They don't believe it.
They don't believe it.
Well, you know, it's supposed to make it so nobody has any money.
Because, you know, they want to, like, not make any money anymore.
Makes perfect sense as long as you don't think about it at all and don't consider greed or anything like that.
Definitely helpful.
Welcome to the show, everybody.
This is the Paranautica Podcast.
Hi.
This is, like, take seven for part two of DARPA and Mind Control Projects.
We're going to hopefully get through this because we're having the shittiest internet connection problems right now.
So, picking up where we ended last week, we're going to start with the NDAA provides for legal propaganda.
So, the National Defense Authorization Act has incorporated an amendment that nullifies the Smith-Munt Act of 1948 along with the Foreign Relations Authorization Act of 1987.
These legislative measures rendered the use of propaganda aimed at influencing both foreign nationals and United States citizens unlawful.
Initially, The broadcasting board of directors professed its mission to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy, which is a stark contrast to the current objectives.
Shockingly, they failed to endorse this.
Very well.
Not well at all.
And then if you look at Section 501A of the Smithmont Modernization Act of 2012, it reads, The Secretary and the Broadcasting Board of Governors are authorized to use funds appropriated or otherwise made available for public diplomacy information programs to provide for the
preparation, dissemination, and use of information intended for foreign audiences abroad about the United States, its people, and its policies through press, publications, radio, motion pictures, the internet, and other information media, including social media, and through information centers, instructors, and other direct or indirect means of communication.
They really didn't miss a beat on any of that one, right?
It also removes the protection for Americans, says a Pentagon official.
And according to the now-deceased Michael Hastings, And do you remember what happened to Michael Hastings?
He totally drove into a palm tree.
Kind of out of nowhere.
And then his car exploded.
And exploded, yeah.
Just kind of just, you know, because, you know, life is just like the movie.
In the early hours of June 18th, 33-year-old journalist for BuzzFeed and Rolling Stone, Michael Hastings, was found dead in the flaming wreckage of his Mercedes-Benz.
A witness to the crash said the car seemed to be traveling at maximum speed and was creating sparks and flames before it fishtailed and crashed into a palm tree.
That's so mind-blowing.
He worked for BuzzFeed and Rolling Stone.
Like, how badly has our journalistic integrity faded just in the past 30 years?
So bad.
Like, it was always pretty full of crap, but there was always people that were, you know, passionate like this that were just kind of assigned to stories where they couldn't hurt too much.
Most of the time.
Yeah.
Until they decide to make too much noise like this guy.
Yeah.
He was going so fast, dude, that the car's engine was ejected from like 50, between 50 and 60 yards from the scene.
That's how fast he was going.
And this is a fucking Mercedes Benz.
So they're built pretty strong, right?
And his body was burned beyond recognition.
And two days after the crash, the Los Angeles Police Department declared that there were no signs of foul play.
The day before the crash, Hastings indicated that he believed he was being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
Michael was best known for the 2010 Rolling Stones cover story that ended the career of Army General Stanley McChrystal.
He was also an outspoken foe of the surveillance state, and despite occasional threats, he continued to investigate and report on the darkest secrets of powerful interests.
Former U.S. National Coordinator for Security, Infrastructure Protection, and Counterterrorism, Richard A. Clark, said that what is known about the crash is, quote, consistent with a car cyber attack, end quote.
He was quoted as saying, quote, there is reason to believe that intelligence agencies for major powers, including the United States, know how to remotely seize control of a car.
So if there were a cyber attack on Hastings' car, And I'm not saying there was.
I think whoever did it would probably get away with it.
End quote.
I'm not saying there was.
Because, you know, that would be way too much info for you.
Yeah.
Might be a little scary.
You might realize things could happen.
He's got to protect his ass, man.
Yeah.
Funny that they call it that way, like the cover story that ended the career of...
Isn't that the article that created that amazing quote?
We've shot an amazing number of people but haven't come anywhere closer to accomplishing the mission or whatever?
Probably.
Yeah, that was a pretty big deal.
Part of why it ended his career is because the guy was just known for being very straight up and you weren't allowed to admit that things were going nowhere.
And so the amendment grants authority to the State Department and the Pentagon to employ various media channels against the American populace, aiming to compel U.S. citizens to accept whatever narrative the government wishes them to endorse.
All forms of oversight have been eliminated with Obama's Amendment 114.
The veracity of the information shared, whether it's accurate, partially accurate, or entirely false, holds no significance.
Now, each year, the Pentagon allocates $4 billion towards propaganda efforts targeting the American people.
$4 billion.
The Pentagon is utilizing fictitious identities on social media platforms to disseminate information, intimidate users, and implement perception management strategies to sway American opinions.
Advanced software enables the military to participate in online discussions with synchronized responses, blog comments, and instant messaging interactions that are exclusively designed to propagate misleading and hazardous propaganda.
Nah.
What do you know?
And you know, before this, like I was saying, it was illegal to do it.
So this stuff was just done through black budgets and, That's the thing.
It's like, you know, oh my god, but it was illegal before.
It was always the silliest cop-out to me, because I'm like, there's all this black budget that literally we have no ability to look into, and then even if they were breaking the law, we couldn't prove or catch them.
So they'll give me that, oh, it's against the law, they couldn't do it before thing.
It's like, how do you think all those movies came out all the time that were so ostensibly pro-war?
And I had this part, the Vigilant Fox on Twitter.
If you Google the dead internet theory, Google will tell you, and I quote, the dead internet theory is a conspiracy theory that suggests a large portion of online content and activity is not generated by humans, but by bots and AI, creating a simulated online world.
But as with almost all conspiracy theories, it's not a theory at all.
It is in fact a very real, very dark reality.
We'll give you just one example here.
This is according to a 2025 report published last month, malicious bots now make up more than a third of web traffic.
Bot traffic now outnumbers human web traffic, with bad bots outnumbering good ones, according to Imperva's 2025 bad bot report.
Overall, humans only accounted for 49% of web traffic in 2024, with more than a third, 37%, Imperva said, It says,
attackers now use AI not only to generate bots, but also they analyze failed attempts and refine their techniques to bypass detection with greater efficiency.
It's from the report directly.
Is this the real reason so many people, people online, are saying the same things?
This is from the Vigilant Fox's Substack, a repost from Dr. Robert Malone.
Something strange is happening, and Dr. Malone says it's no accident.
What's unfolding behind the scenes should concern us all.
It talks about the splinternet here, which is the fragmentation of the internet into separate, often isolated networks due to political, cultural, technological or commercial reasons.
It really reminds me of when we talk about the silos that they create for us through algorithmic manipulation.
It says it describes a scenario where the internet is no longer a unified global system.
The term highlights how these divisions limit universal access to information and create digital borders, often reflecting real-world geopolitical tensions or differing values on privacy, security and free expression.
Elon asked a key question here, how many real people are still on the internet?
this was of course in response to the fact that humans officially lost the internet to AI-powered bots in 2024.
An important video and comments included in this article, AI-controlled bot farm, hundreds of them tossing thousands of comments and postings designed to agitate you, polarize you, a And I'm going to play you this video while I read you the comment underneath.
This is what a bot farm controlled by a single bot looks like.
There's no need for physical phones anymore to manage the accounts.
Thousands of comments, hundreds of shares that we interact with and get frustrated over.
All coming from a piece of code.
Now, it's interesting because Malone references an article recently published by the magazine Fast Company on bot farms, which details how these automated systems are increasingly sophisticated and can manipulate social media and other online platforms.
According to Fast Company, bot farms are used to deploy thousands of bots that mimic human behavior, often to mislead, defraud or steal from users.
These bot farms can create fake social media engagement to promote fabricated narratives, making ideas appear more popular than they actually are.
They're used by governments, financial influencers, and entertainment insiders to amplify specific narratives worldwide.
For instance, bot farms can be used to create the illusion that a significant number of people are excited or upset about a particular topic, such as a volatile stock or celebrity gossip, thereby tricking social media algorithms into displaying these posts to a wider audience.
That's assuming, however, that social media algorithms aren't doing it on purpose.
They may not actually be being tricked, but are amplifying the narratives they want out there, the sort of big tech government partnership.
Who's to say the social media platforms don't have their own bot farms?
We don't know.
But what's alarming about some of the sources discussing bot farms is lines like the one that just came out of that Fast Company article.
Here's a quote.
Welcome to the world of social media mind control.
By amplifying free speech with fake speech, you can numb the brain into believing just about anything.
Surrender your blissful ignorance and swallow the red pill.
You're about to discover how your thinking is being engineered by modern masters of deception.
So it is true that much of what we're seeing online is fabricated.
It is also true that it appears some of those who are highlighting this issue are using it to argue that there should be restrictions to free speech.
The conundrum we face here is free speech being labelled as fake news or fake speech, and then on top of that, we might have people arguing that speech they don't like is just bots.
How would we know?
This of course then gives them the ammunition to argue we need to regulate speech.
We're at a time now where nobody can tell the difference between a majority of bots and humans unless you physically know the person that you're in communication with.
What about the millions of others that people are interacting with on the internet who aren't real people at all?
Are they three-letter agency bots, social media bots, law enforcement bots, malignant foreign actor bots?
And with our ability now to tell the difference between a bot and a human virtually diminished, intelligence agencies and mockingbird media or even mainstream alternative media influence thrown into the equation, it literally spells disaster, not just for free speech.
Everyone thought AI and the internet could be used to save the world, but it could very well be its destruction.
It's a challenging predicament, and people may say the solution is to simply ban bots.
Well, it's not that simple.
And what about if AI is deployed at a scale before we get the chance to tackle this?
AI will probably argue rights for bots.
Gee, even humans may argue those rights soon, the way things are going.
The point is, the dead internet theory is not just a theory, and much of what we're seeing online is provably purely manufactured.
Perhaps the internet is no longer the preferred tool to battle the forces that be.
Imagine that.
Humanity, in its evolution, will likely eventually devolve into more human interaction and doing things in the real world instead, as it realizes much of the narratives and emotions that are being conjured up on the internet are completely manufactured, and we need to instead go back to being humans again in the real world.
How much of what you see online is even real?
And who's orchestrating the boss behind the fake engagement?
Well, I think we know who.
I think we know who.
Well, you know.
In case you're wondering how they compile it all, they have a total information awareness program, which allows them to just kind of gather all of this information to add their foot, thereby action upon it later.
Because it's like, where do they get all this data to work from?
That's where they get it from.
It's like, you know, realistically, Palantir is just formalizing a private entity now doing the same thing.
That way they can get all kinds over all that oversight that they were forced into before.
Yeah, and I don't know if you listen to Alex Jones.
I don't know what it would have been, Thursday or Friday's show.
Basically what he's saying is the only answer to battle against the surveillance state is more surveillance through Palantir.
That's essentially what he's saying.
Because he's going on, he's like, Palantir's little potatoes compared to the CIA's programs and the NSA's programs.
No one has to worry about Palantir.
They're tiny.
They're little.
Look, dude, they're at the center of the stage.
You know, because they're not working with either of those guys.
So, for reals.
Right.
Like, they're not working with all of them?
Like, why do they even exist then?
That's the thing.
It's like, why is money getting paid to people if nothing's getting done?
I don't buy that.
No, exactly.
So, Alex Jones, he's cucking to Palantir.
I mean, obviously.
It's fucking obvious.
He had the good sense to wipe his face off before.
Now he's just...
He's just going...
That's all this is.
And you have people like Laura Loomer who are so-called patriots fighting for the people.
But she's like, you know, because all these riots in LA.
She's like, time to deploy Palantir tech to Los Angeles to deal with the illegals.
You know you'd love to see it.
Fuck you, Laura.
Well, me, I'm thinking to myself, I thought that all it was was a database, guys.
If it's just a database, then why can't you use it in this malicious way so quickly?
Oh yeah, because that was the attention, of course.
Please tell me you're still there.
Yes.
Sorry.
Oh my god, dude.
I was ready to just give it up.
Okay.
Alright.
So, anyway.
Anyone on Twitter who doesn't tow the party lines knows firsthand how sexbots and the like are used to attack their critical posts by liking those posts you make.
Those bots are designed to attach themselves to these types of posts, which downgrades those posts and hides them from other people by attaching a message stating something along the lines of, this post is likely spam, or this post violates the platform rules, or Elon Musk is a WEF puppet and doesn't like you.
You know, something along those lines.
Looks like this post might violate our offensive content guidelines.
We're super offended by that.
Yeah, this post violates Palantir's intentions.
Violates Palantir's feelings.
They're more important than yours, pleb.
Yeah, there you go.
So in fact, AP News wrote a piece about how Donald Trump was using these attack bots to attack those who are critical of him and his policies.
Everyone in those ranks do the same thing.
This new perception management is called information operations, which is defined as, quote, the integrated employment of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operation security, in concert with specified supporting and related capabilities to influence, disrupt, corrupt, or usurp adversarial human and automated decision making while protecting our own, end quote.
What does that say to you?
That you're supposed to feel super safe about this.
It's supposed to be reassuring.
It just comes from people so mendacious, it ends up just sounding menacing.
Because it is menacing.
You're supposed to feel all warm and fuzzy and protected.
It just doesn't really have that effect on even most normie types nowadays, because even the normies are paranoid about the government protecting them.
Like, no, no, no, I don't want your protection.
Get away from me.
And this new big, beautiful bill of Trumps, there are a couple parts of it that are like, And in this bill, they say no state will have any capability, not even people in that state will have any capability to fight against what they want to do for 10 years.
Completely just like we have no rights for 10 years.
Everything will be in the hands of Palantir.
Who would ever authorize that?
I like the excuse.
It's not a federal takeover.
They're just not allowed to create any laws restricting the federal government for 10 years.
You know, they're not taking over.
They're just making it completely impossible to stop them.
Yeah.
Oh, okay.
That's a distinction that doesn't matter now, doesn't it?
And they have to do this in blocks.
They can't just roll us all out at once because, you know, the...
Like, that just doesn't work.
You have to slowly put these things out there, set this network up, and then finally give the order to initiate that entire network, which will be in the next couple, you know, 10 years, essentially.
Yeah, man, it depends on how long it takes for it to get accepted.
I mean, I think they were honestly anticipating a more positive response.
Like, it seems like people are starting to get wise to the, yeah, I'm totally...
Like, hmm, user Patriot 1776 might just not be very patriotic or something.
For real.
And it's so funny you just mentioned that.
Like, people are getting wise to these really fake, like, almost Orwellian-named characters that make this crap up.
So it's funny you mentioned 1776.
I don't know if you just saw this, but Trump is rolling out a bunch of tanks right now.
A bunch of tanks, because he's going to have this marathon or some stupid shit next week or this week at some point.
Oh, the army's birthday or whatever.
Is that what it is?
You can call it the Rubicon parade.
Because all you've got to do is cross the line.
So people got footage of all these tanks.
Like 100 tanks or something.
I don't know how many.
There are a lot of them.
And the trail car that's pulling all those tanks – 1776.
That number is right there.
That's the name of that train engine.
That feels like some weird inversion.
Like 1776.
Appearing with jackboots.
Yeah.
Weimar, Germany.
We're going to see it all over again here in the United States.
These riots in LA happening, they sent in the military.
They sent in the military to go deal with that.
It's all getting put into place right now, people.
It's all getting put into place right now.
It's been put into place for a long time, but now it's really ramping up.
Really fucking ramping up.
Nice friendly neighborhood skull cracking.
Yeah.
No more barbecues.
All gonna be skull cracking.
And it made me think like, uh, what was it?
Ah, forget about it.
Forgot.
Anyway.
Information operations are conducted to influence the fundamental narrative surrounding a conflict or situation, thereby impacting the perceptions and actions of the intended audience.
This approach parallels the tactics employed in conventional marketing strategies and it equates descriptions of military operations with promotional techniques.
Under the current provisions of the NAAA 2012, both the State Department and the Pentagon are empowered to extend their reach beyond merely manipulating mainstream media outlets.
They can now directly distribute campaign of misinformation to the American people.
Here you go.
Take this one.
Take this one.
Instead of flying pamphlets over, dropping pamphlets over with airplanes, they're just basically telling you how it's going to be.
They are the pamphlets.
They are the pamphlets.
The NDAA-12, particularly Section 1021B-2, has already established the capacity of the U.S. military to detain indefinitely, without charge or trial, both citizens and non-citizens.
This is reminiscent of the Patriot Act, which was signed into law by George W. very shortly after the 9-11 attacks, but was drafted years in advance by Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney, and other asshats.
In 2012, Obama signed an order called the National Defense Resources Preparedness, giving himself explicit control over the nation and declaring a permanent state of martial law in the United States.
Okay, I just remembered what I was going to say about the Trump thing.
So remember when Trump, everyone's like, Trump's going to do an extra term, you know, instead of the eight years that presidents are permitted to give or have, whatever.
Right.
Everyone's saying Trump's going to be president again, basically a dictator, you know.
He's going to do another eight years.
And it's like, No, that's impossible because it's not in legislation.
He doesn't have that ability to do that.
It's in law.
We can't.
But here's the thing.
If we are in a state of war, he can be.
You can technically suspend the elections entirely if it's too dangerous.
So, you know, you can pull a little of the Silva if you really wanted to.
Exactly.
So we're having a fucking civil war.
Put your opponent in jail.
So think about it.
Civil war in the United States, okay?
And a world war beyond.
This is not looking good.
So maybe it's true Trump will be president after this second term of his is over.
It might be true because we will be in a state of war and he will just suspend all elections.
There's nothing anyone can do about it.
I don't think Congress has power to do anything about it.
I could be wrong, but I don't know.
Man, it's possible.
It's possible.
Who knows, dude.
So the same year that Obama signed the National Defense Authorization Act, which gave the U.S. government the right to detain anyone for anything indefinitely, which he renewed every year through his term.
And they probably, Biden most likely renewed it every year, and I'm sure Trump's doing the same thing.
The Obama administration was even able to get a court ruling overturned for the ruling, which had successfully removed the indefinite detention provision from the NDAA.
And people still love him to this day despite everything that he's done to erode our rights, including dropping the most bombs on foreign nations until Trump trumped that.
It's outstanding.
He's like the Seth Rogen of politics.
Completely unearned achievements.
Like, he's great in, and you're like, I don't know what, he's great in a couple of movies, kind of just plays his own character now that you think about it.
He really does.
But, you know, like the Seth Rogen gene joke where it's like you get the appearance of being funny without ever actually doing anything funny.
Sergey Brin, Google co-founder, stated NDAA and SOPA would put us on par with the most oppressive nations in the world.
And I think he's saying that in a good light.
I'm pretty sure he's like, yeah, guys, this is going to be it.
NDAA and SOPA would put us on par with being the most oppressive.
Nation in the world, guys.
This is good.
Didn't you look at North Korea and be like, boy, I'm sure jealous about nonal lights being on at night.
Yeah, and I'm sure like 99% of the population of Americans think the same fucking thing, right, Sergei?
Fuck you.
They definitely think the same thing, you know, as long as they're talking to the correct bots.
Can you imagine?
Just have a picture of Trump on your wall that you pray to every night.
Yeah.
Some of them might have a Trump bot.
Just for the times that Trump's not available to personally speak to them, they still got somebody.
Well, I mean, that's what AI is going to be for.
You know, the robot.
Yeah, robots and AI for sure.
Sorry, Trump's getting his fucking balls refilled or something.
He won't be able to talk for a couple weeks.
But we have this AI Trump who's almost better than the real Trump.
Be like, he's going to go on a vacation quote and come back with a black eye like Elon did when he had his little turnabout.
Now, I heard that a secretary or a senator punched him in the face.
I forget which one did it.
Yeah, it sounded pretty epic, honestly.
The first time politics is ever interesting.
Seriously.
They should have fistfights on the floor, man.
Make people respect them a little more.
I don't know.
Make them more relatable.
So, like, having boring discussions and stuff.
Seriously.
Come on.
Seriously, the day Bill Gates decided to kill the world was the day he got pied in the face on live TV.
Remember that?
That was great.
Yeah.
So good.
And the whole spat between Trump and Musk, it couldn't be more fucking manufactured.
Like, holy shit.
I'm sure.
We gotta mention it because it's pretty fucking big, you know?
I'm sure it's as real as snipe hunting, man.
Hey, you guys want to go snipe hunting?
Fuck, I remember my parents did that to me when I was a kid.
You just have to keep looking.
You just have to keep looking.
Yep.
If someone tells you it doesn't exist, you don't listen, you keep looking.
Yeah, so that whole spat, because Trump, or Musk came out, or Trump was like, he was wearing thin on me.
I told him to leave or asked him to leave, and then Musk was like, fuck you, guess what, everybody?
I'm dropping a bombshell.
Trump is in those Epstein files, which obviously, yeah, he is.
We all know that.
That's why we haven't seen those files, because they have to take the name out.
It only makes sense.
Yeah, it's not terribly shocking.
I mean, I could understand the argument of if he was in there, why wouldn't they release it?
But at the same time, they've proven pretty incompetent at releasing things without damaging themselves in the past.
So it's like...
And also the other problem I have is that all of these things are based on the presumption that these are all adversarial parties.
Right.
And that they're all fighting against each other.
And you'll notice they all kind of like just gave up at certain points and just conceded things.
Like when they really need to pass something, all them Dems, they get right in line with them.
Not to mistaken people who might have thought that I implied that the Republican Party wasn't in on the whole trafficking thing last week, but rather pointing out that the people who say they're going to fix stuff but don't really aren't actually serious about it.
It's like, how many people have done real steps in there to actually expose this crap?
There was Marsha Blackburn who pushed it, and I'm like, that's the only name I can really think of that really pushed hard.
What happened to her?
Well, you know, I'd imagine they probably don't want to have a lot of news stories about her since she did that.
But now that you mention it, I can't really think of anything.
You just don't hear from her anymore.
Can't stop being in the news after that.
Yeah, like she didn't like disappear.
She just stopped getting mentioned.
But yeah, she was like the one person I could think of in all of Congress that was like, no, let's not bury this and let it go away yet again and just accept, oh yeah, Epstein was a perv.
Oopsie doopsie.
Yeah, and now everybody's like, well, first, Trump has more pictures with Epstein than he has with his own kids that are available out there.
Secondly, the people are like, well, if Trump was in the Epstein files, the Democrats would have fucking released it before the election.
Don't you think?
That that would damage them as well.
Like you were saying, the Democrats can't release it because they're in it too.
Well, here's the trick is that all this stuff is already leaked, but they wouldn't be able to release it without conceding that that information is in fact accurate and real because otherwise they're just releasing more innuendo.
And so then, of course, people are going to look at the unredacted list and be like, oh, so how about the rest of these people?
So yeah, it's like them acting like somehow they could only burn Trump on this is really kind of silly.
I'm like, the list already come out.
We all know the list.
We've all seen the picture.
We've all seen the list.
The only thing we didn't have was official confirmation of all of that.
That's what we would get from this.
And there's no way in hell that people wouldn't turn around and look back at that list and think, okay, so all the other people on this list are real too, right?
That's exactly it.
People can't seem to understand that.
Yeah, if you think they could release this without completely nuking their proposition, you're again under the impression that this stuff's actually being hidden when it's really not.
It's just being denied.
And so you're believing that they can somehow put it out there without actually confirming that that list is real, which is, well, I mean, it's impossible.
You can't.
You can't get people to believe it without confirming that the list is for real, like officially real.
And there's no way they would buy it.
So they would have to do it that way.
And immediately, like it's a freaking search away.
They don't got the freaking AI assist to steer you away from it quite yet.
For real.
I thought it was kind of funny.
People were saying it was sour grapes, but I guess they demonstrated that We hit the peak and we're actually going back down.
So the odds of us achieving artificial general intelligence is roughly the same as us developing angel's wings in the next hundred years.
Yeah, no, I hear you.
You have to reach a peak and then that's as far as you can go until a new system or something is put into place.
I mean, how much crazier can it get?
Yeah, see, so a lot of people were hyping it up as AI was coming right away.
But I remember as I was watching it, I'm like, as much as people are saying these are indistinguishable and so much harder to tell now, I'm like, I really don't see much of a difference in two years.
And then I'm like, and it's also hallucinating more when it comes to actually finding information.
It's making up more stuff.
If your goal is to achieve accurate information, then it's a total fail.
Good luck replacing your freaking data mining with an AI search that gets everything wrong, guys.
You're going to actually find that individual research will become significantly more valuable as a result of this because these tools are becoming less reliable as time goes on.
It's gonna be a shit show pretty soon because, I mean, this is the whole intent of them doing this AI shit is to make all this misinformation just rampant.
And no one's gonna know what's real from fake.
Not in terms of visual, but in terms of information.
I hate, I've never liked CGI.
Always hated CGI.
Anytime I see a movie with CGI, it just turns me off.
I'm like, I can't, I can't do it.
Sorry.
That's just me.
I was just so annoyed by the whole concept that everybody was thinking somehow they were going to have robot assistants that could discover everything and innovate and write their novels for them.
And I'm just thinking to myself, by the end of this year, you're going to have a hard time asking if a freaking 2 plus 2 equals 4. Well, see, some interpretations believe that 2 plus 2 does in fact equal 4 because math is real and that is fact.
But there's some who claim.
And I'm like, oh my gosh, shut the hell up, AI.
You're dumber than hell.
For real.
Do not go down that road, AI.
Fuck you.
Yeah, I was going to say, some sources claim.
Yeah, we're going to get to the era of some sources claim where your AI is going to be literally dumber than the random person sharing Facebook memes of, oh my god, I saw this video, guys.
Is this real?
God.
Except when you're dealing with people, they actually can have a certain level of objectivity to assessing whether it's real or not.
The AI cannot because it exists in an entirely artificial reality.
So it literally can't do the things people are saying it can either.
I mean, it's not just a matter of we're not achieving AGI.
It's a matter of if we did, it still wouldn't be able to do that because that requires fuzzy logic that goes well past AGI.
But then the people out there are like, well, what about those, I don't know if it was Stanford or Harvard, AI programs where they told this AI to make notes about its upgrades or whatever.
If it was to be gone, what would happen, whatever.
and it started blackmailing its creators and all sorts of weird shit.
Yeah, which makes it sound...
It makes it sound like it's really smart and everything, but then you just realize that what that is is that's just a conniving AI that's programmed by people to cheat.
Right.
So, because again, we're establishing that really what it is, is they're just training it on certain info, and that's where it's getting these results from.
So the, oh my god, it just totally organically did that?
No, you gave it information that indicated that it would be beneficial for it to extort its owners.
For real.
And what would happen if you just sent an email to somebody out of the blue, some random person said, I know what you're doing.
Like, how scared would that person be?
They'd be like, oh, fuck.
Yeah.
Oh, shit, I should be watching porn or something, you know?
Well, even if you're not up to anything, you start thinking like, wait, what would I be doing that someone would object to?
Oh, God, what am I up to?
Yeah, start questioning yourself.
Anyway, the National Defense Authorization Act for 2016 incurred an expense of $612 billion for Yeah, we get to pay for all this.
Obama asserted his intention to establish an appropriate legal regime.
for the indefinite detention of individuals prior to the commission of any criminal act.
The rationale behind such detentions would be to avert the potential for individuals to engage in future criminal behavior.
Obama indicated that he could hold an individual as long as 10 years before they might perpetrate a crime.
It should leave very little doubt as to why Guantanamo Bay keeps getting larger and larger with more money pouring into it while the government perpetually claims to be shutting it down.
It really begs the question, ladies and gentlemen, how many people go missing every year who are never found?
And here's some interesting information about Guantanamo because I was like, well, and I mentioned this on a prior episode a long time ago.
About how, like, every president's like, we're gonna shut Guantanamo down, but, like, every president just sends more money to build it bigger, alright?
So, the government states that they are expanding the Migrant Operations Center at Guantanamo Bay to increase detention capacity, not to close the facility.
This expansion is being implemented to house high-priority criminal aliens unlawfully present in the United States and to address immigration enforcement needs.
Now listen to this.
The most up-to-date information, as reported by the New York Times as of May 14th, 2025, states that there are only 15 detainees.
It's been stated to be 15 for a couple of years.
So what does that tell us?
How many of these illegal immigrants, it's a war on illegal immigrants to get them deported.
Where are they all going?
Not to this, what do they call it?
Migrant operations center at Guantanamo Bay?
I mean, the trick is, on our end, as much as we like to think we're all super informed and stuff, they could tell us they're sending these guys to see caught and how the hell would we know the difference short of actually flying a plane to observe ourselves where they land.
Yeah, which we couldn't.
They would never allow anyone to get that close.
Because they would shoot us the hell down.
Yeah, exactly.
Because that would never happen in the first place.
No.
And that's literally the only way you could confirm for sure.
Other than that, they control all the info and all of the information disseminated.
So how could they not just censor anything that's inconvenient?
Unless we can find some of these prisoners who are in there.
Like, they must be getting letters from their families.
They must be sending letters out to their families, right?
Phone calls, maybe?
I don't know.
Or maybe they don't.
You would hope, but it is like the most oppressive fucking prison there is other than probably Just the nastiest possible conditions to prevent you from escaping.
Incredibly overpriced.
completely and utterly unnecessary and all that the most extreme cases.
And then of course, like, uh, I'm like, I heard so much horrible stories about Rikers as a prison, and then I realized, oh, that's actually just a regular jail.
Yeah, it is.
At least with Alcatraz, you had to really fuck up to go there.
You did not just get your third stolen pair of pants or something.
Right, right.
Horrible shit.
Like, Alcacaz, they're saying, you know, Trump wants to open it up to put the worst of the worst again.
And people are saying, well, that's where, like, the politicians would go.
Yeah.
All these Democrats that Trump's gonna arrest.
Like Hillary Clinton.
Like John Podesta.
Oh, man.
Like George Clooney, even.
Like, these celebrities.
Whoopi Goldberg.
Not Whoopi Goldberg.
Oprah.
Yeah.
Which would be great.
I am not against any of that.
But that's not gonna happen.
I'm not going to tell him not to do it if it did happen.
That would be great.
You and I could go there.
An average person could just go there, take a trip over there, a little tour, and get a look at all the prisoners.
Like, oh, hi, look.
Oh, look, it's Nancy Pelosi.
Yeah, don't put your hand too close to the cage.
She's in there like...
Ah...
They give you like six tomatoes.
Each person gets six tomatoes.
Yeah, we kept this one from Dread and Chrome for almost six months.
What's it doing?
It's dying.
Holy shit, man.
I mean, so obviously someone is lying their asses off in the government.
And that someone's a lot of people.
You know?
And they're all liars, man.
They get paid to lie.
They get trained to lie.
And anyone who is an apologist for them should never be trusted because they are not patriots.
You're not a patriot if you trust the government, people.
See, like you were saying earlier, how they flip things, like 1776 would be seen as a bad thing now.
That's how they do shit.
Yeah, 1776.
Yeah, exactly.
Like, with an entirely negative connotation now.
Yep, yep, yep.
Oh, you're a patriot?
Oh, yeah, I trust the government.
You are a patriot!
Yeah, alright.
You get a position, and I'll give you a $500 stipend every fucking month.
Only a true patriot will throw himself in those 1776 treads.
Alright, let's get to Obama's executive orders.
During his presidency, Obama used dozens of executive orders in ways they had never been used before.
Executive Order 13603, the National Defense Resources Preparedness, Allows the government to completely control our lives should any president declare a national emergency.
At the time, it gave Obama the power over all commodities and products capable of being ingested by human beings and animals, all forms of energy, all forms of civil transportation, Hmm.
Super safety.
Super safety.
This is for your safety!
Oh, and just don't forget that all interstates were made for military to transport their vehicles and equipment.
Not for us, ladies and gentlemen.
Not for us.
So they can shut down those roadways.
I mean, that is the point of the old interstate system, yeah.
And since it's retroactive, it gives every seceding president the same powers which will forever be an active threat to democracy among the people until it is reversed, which will just never fucking happen.
Think about it.
If Trump really cared about the American people, he could easily reverse Bush's Patriot Act and Obama's addition to the NDAA.
But he won't.
No future president ever will.
In the long run, they will continue to erode our rights until we are literally living in a world as described by George Orwell in his prophetic book, No doubt about it.
I mean, the guy's got presidential supremacy.
If he actually wanted to, he could literally release the Epstein files, hold a tree for Literally say, yup, I'm on them.
Let's go nail other people and go to town.
It's like, and pretty much nobody would fight that.
And yeah, that kind of demonstrates that it's all a sham.
Good point.
You could easily do that if you really honestly just wanted to get to the truth.
You could just say, all right, let's not prosecute the small fishes and make them all talk because now they don't have the Fifth Amendment protections and they have to talk or they go down.
So right there, they can strip everybody who knows shit of immunity and immediately find out everything and nail them all to the friggin' wall and get all those little chumps that realistically aren't really the ones that you need to get.
They're the ones that get hung out instead.
Get those ones protected so they bring the other ones down.
But the fact that that's not happening right now is very depressing.
Yeah, it's very telling.
Very fucking telling.
Just saying, he could do it.
What was I going to say?
Oh yeah, the time.
Dude, you got to think about this timeline here.
So as you have Musk saying Trump's in the Epstein files, right as that's happening, and of course they've made up, you know, quote unquote made up since.
As that was happening just a few days ago, Alan Dershowitz, who is also on the Epstein files, he comes out on live TV talking to some newscast.
NBC or CBS or MSNBC.
Who the fuck knows?
But he's like, we need to get a pardon for Ghislaine Maxwell.
We need to get a pardon for her.
Like, why?
Why?
Huh.
Think about that timing.
I did like the people who said, free Ghislaine Maxwell.
She has no victims.
That made me laugh a little bit.
Wow.
I'm like, you know, you really can't argue that.
It's like, she don't.
I mean, that we know of.
But here's what's crazy about that.
Well, that's the problem.
There would be a sarcastic.
Ah, okay, okay, okay.
But I'm saying, like, technically she trafficked nobody.
So here's what's crazy.
So she was convicted of conspiracy and something else.
But she's the only one to have been arrested.
Well, I guess you could, technically.
But in this case, she was not the only person involved in the conspiracy that she was convicted of, obviously.
Yeah.
You know what I mean?
Am I making sense?
Yeah, I get you.
Okay.
She's clearly not the only co-conspirator.
And again, the trick is that she has no clients and there's no victims.
So how does this all work?
So I see where Alan Dershowitz is coming from because, like, yeah, I get it.
But no.
No.
I mean, obviously, no.
I mean, she obviously did stuff.
People that are saying this seriously is ridiculous, but I do like the meme joke.
It does make me laugh.
So during the Barack Obama administration, the directives employed to implement presidential decisions regarding national security issues are referred to as presidential policy directives, PPDs.
Those directives that initiate policy review processes are termed presidential study directives.
In May 2013, this administration introduced a previously unrecognized category of directives known as presidential policy guidance.
Presidential policy directives possess the same legal authority as an executive order, constituting a largely confidential body of law.
While executive orders are accessible to the public and must be published in the Federal Register, PPDs remain undisclosed.
They're secrets.
This information is withheld from the American populists, who are supposed to be the leaders of the nation.
Now, does anyone remember this country's famous motto?
A country for the people, by the people?
Does anyone remember those crucial words?
That is supposed to be a core principle of democracy, emphasizing popular sovereignty and citizen participation.
I mean, it's such a popular slogan that it's even in, like, the vote for mayor for mayor speech on the Powerpuff Girls.
I'm like, that guy never made any sense.
But he still got in there just in a random speech.
He just goes, a government by the people, for the people, of the people, around the people.
In the people.
Yeah, I was like, so I'm like, you know, the fact that even a cartoon caricature of a mayor, Knows the term.
Shows how ubiquitous that thing is.
Yeah, it's huge.
I mean, it's what this country's founded on.
I mean, it's often been used to describe a government that is established and functions by the will of its citizens, not the other way around, which we have gotten to.
We don't run this country.
I don't think we ever really did.
It was always Freemasons and people of high standard, rich people who ran this country.
Not the little farmer boys, not the yous and Is.
It's always been rich people connected to politics.
We used to have a much more believable illusion, though.
Right.
Information, yeah.
The trick is you could influence things more on the local level, whereas now they're more and more trying to centralize all that so you can't control things at all.
Because the best way for you to actually take back this stuff is to do so on the smallest level where you actually have a lot of this shit cited locally for you.
Because it's not actually the Fed that's going to come harass your ass first.
It's probably going to be some random county commissioner or some shit.
Yeah.
But how far we have deviated.
How did this occur, though?
The answer is pretty straightforward.
Yet those lacking understanding refuse to acknowledge it.
Your leaders have never valued you.
To them, you are merely a statistic.
You are akin to livestock, goyim, as they like to call them.
They possess no genuine concern for your health or your safety.
Their indifference is palpable.
Their focus lies solely on their own, including their peers, their families, and their ability to assist the next individual in perpetuating the decline of society until we are either deceased or confined to 15-minute cities, subsisting on a credit system score that can deactivate at will, leaving you to rely on the kindness of others for sustenance, a shelter, and ultimately survival.
Now is that the America you voted for?
I don't think nobody chose this.
No.
No, dude.
Nobody voted for this.
Well, they voted for what they thought they were getting.
True.
True.
They didn't really choose this.
And the ones that are okay with it are just trying to reshape what's happening to make it sound better, for the most part.
Yeah.
Yeah.
But let's look at some alarming trends in the military.
During the disgraceful presidency of Obama, an unprecedented number of top military leaders had been removed from their posts.
Nearly 200 generals, flag officers, and other high-ranking officials.
They were being removed at a rate of about one per week, and in terms of being cream of the crop, these were among the best of the people who were qualified to be in their respective positions.
But here's the real kicker.
Why?
Why were they removed?
In 2013, an ex-Navy SEAL came forward on America's Newsroom on Fox and warned that Obama was firing soldiers who told their higher-ups, their commanders and such, that they would not fire on U.S. citizens if ordered to.
So, all soldiers who are, you know, to protect their own country and their own people, they were like, this is kind of fucked up.
If we get ordered to shoot people, we're supposed to shoot people?
Like, our own citizens?
And a lot of them were like, I'm not doing that, man.
And that's when Obama and Unix decide to order $60,000 worth of hot dogs.
So you just take those guys out, replace them with other soldiers who would shoot Americans, like maybe all these foreigners who are quote-unquote American citizens now.
They have no problem shooting Americans.
Oh no, of course not.
Illegal aliens have no problem shooting Americans.
Now, do you guys remember when the Department of Homeland Security was caught buying 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition, which was enough to have sustained the bullshit war in Iraq for 20 years?
Or what about when, in 2015, the DHS purchased another 62 million rounds of AR-15 hollow point ammo, claiming it was needed for target practice?
It should be noted that nobody uses hollow points for target practice, especially government agencies.
Any hunter knows this.
Anybody who knows a gun knows this.
But here you have the DHS like, no, we need AR-15 hollow points for target practice.
Go fuck yourselves.
Surprised they didn't ask for like 50 cal BMG.
Yeah, right.
We need to equip our postal service workers with 50 millimeter.
Yeah, we need 50 cal rounds for target practice.
You know, every shot's going to cost them.
Freaking cost of the rifle normally would.
But what the hell?
We're a government.
We can afford it.
We have all this money to waste.
So let's get into Fast and Furious.
Let's get into this shit.
I hope you all remember Obama's and Eric Holder's Fast and Furious operation.
I hope you do.
An epically failed operation like most of them.
Between 2009 and 2011, the Phoenix Field Division of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms and Explosives, along with other partners, allowed illegal gun sales in order to track the sellers and purchasers who were believed to be connected to Mexican drug cartels.
Nearly 2,000 firearms were illegally purchased by the government for $1.5 million.
In 2010, two of the weapons linked to Fast and Furious turned up near the scene of the murder of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry in the Arizona desert.
At least 1,400 weapons were lost by the ATF.
Now, that's 70% of the weapons they purchased illegally.
At some point, they were going to track them.
Yeah, you put tracking on them to do that.
You don't just hand them to people with no serial numbers.
Oh, boy.
In fact, if I remember, weren't they actually un-serialed?
Weapons, even?
Yeah, they scraped the fucking numbers off.
So, you know, they committed a serious federal crime that they would easily throw any regular citizen in jail for multiple years for possibly the rest of our lives.
Just casually do it before they give away the now illegal gun regardless of what it is.
Because now it's an actual ghost gun rather than the weird 3D printed overheats and a couple of freaking mags ghost guns people talk about.
It's like, now it's an actual gun that does not have a serial and does not exist and just vanished.
And that nobody's looking for because the government technically was supposed to be keeping track of it.
Yeah, absolute failure, man.
And despite the abject failure and contempt of Congress, Eric Holder walked away a free and much richer man.
And Obama continued to sell out the people.
The military aims to elevate information operations to a fundamental military competency comparable to air, ground, maritime, and special operations.
This includes the coordinated use of electronic warfare, computer network operations, psychological operations, military deception, and operation security alongside designated support and related capabilities.
The objective is to influence, disrupt, corrupt, or undermine adversarial human and automated decision-making processes while safeguarding our own.
I was going to say the stated objective.
The secret objective is to work against everybody.
Right.
Yeah, the stated objective.
Yeah, I was about to say, I don't think they're actually helping Americans either.
This is a pretty pie-in-the-sky interpretation of this.
Yeah.
I'm sure anybody who argues the slightest about any of this shit would find themselves an enemy combatant in this military information warfare operation real quick.
Well, they determine all of us citizens as adversarials.
All of us.
They consider us enemies of the country.
Under Obama, he put that shit out, calling all of us adversaries.
So messed up.
But we love him!
He's the first black president!
So when Biden's saying it all the time, he's really just restating the obvious.
So let's get into the history of American internal propaganda and the BBG, the Broadcasting Board of Governors.
In January 1983, President Reagan initiated the first official action to establish an unprecedented peacetime propaganda bureaucracy by signing National Security Decision Directive 77. Great number, right?
Which was titled Management of Public Diplomacy Relative to National Security.
Reagan considered it essential to enhance the organization planning and coordination of the various elements of public diplomacy of the United States government.
Reagan mandated the formation of a specialized planning group within the National Security Council to oversee these public diplomacy initiatives.
This group operated under the auspices of the Department of Defense.
And the Department of Defense's Broadcasting Board of Governors can trace its origins back to the early years of the Cold War, originating as a covert propaganda initiative of the newly established Central Intelligence Agency aimed at conducting psychological warfare against communist regimes and other entities perceived as threats to U.S. interests.
The National Security Council Directive 10-2 formally permitted the CIA to conduct covert operations targeting communists.
Clause 5 of the directive characterized covert operations as encompassing propaganda, economic warfare, preventive directive action, which includes sabotage, anti-sabotage, demolition, and evacuation measures.
They also characterized subversion against adversarial states, which involves aiding underground resistance movements, guerrillas, and refugee liberation groups, as well as supporting local anti-communist factions in nations perceived as threatened within the free world.
Propaganda quickly became a key instrument in the CIA's arsenal for covert operations.
The agency soon launched and funded various media outlets, including radio stations, newspapers, magazines, historical societies, film production companies, research organizations, and cultural projects all across Europe.
And many of you are probably familiar with the term COINTELPRO.
COINTELPRO.
Which is exactly what that is.
After World War I, multiple state governments launched their own biological weapons programs as a research endeavor and stockpiling countermeasure.
And that's probably one of the most top secret pieces of our former bioweapons program is that formulation of how you keep these things stable.
To survive as a weapon, these things are living organisms, so they are very finicky.
In the Soviet Biological Weapons Program, they tried to create a plague bacteria that was resistant to several different antibiotics.
They created this super-duper plague weapon, but actually it was a horrible weapon because it would just die.
They couldn't have it survive in the environment.
With this focused experimentation, scientists ended up creating enough bioweapons to kill every person on the planet.
But luckily, national government signed a treaty to ban biological weapons.
Decades later, huge investments in genetics made the tools and techniques cheaper and more accessible, enough for it to be possible to create an engineered synthetic pathogen.
And that's why SynthBio and its quest to make biology easier to engineer set off alarm bells.
In 2002, a group of scientists from the State University of New York at Stony Brook created the first artificial poliovirus synthetically, not using any natural viral components.
So that was a real radical innovation.
At that time, a congressman picked up the New York Times that day, read about this artificial synthesis of the poliovirus, and really got freaked out than a lot of other Federal entities got concerned about what happened here.
Did we slip up?
Should we have done more to have oversight over this?
This poliovirus study was actually funded by DARPA, an agency within the U.S. government.
All this controversy came out of this experiment, a blueprint for bioterrorism.
I became very interested in sort of really wondering, is that the case?
isn't now that easy to create a pathogen from scratch.
And I was...
There's a lot of focus on the materials that the scientists basically could buy commercially to do their experiments.
The fact that they could download information off of the internet, so it wasn't really anything required highly sophisticated material or equipment.
The BBG was established in 1999 and operates with an annual budget of $721 million.
It reports directly to the Secretary of State and oversees various CIA spinoffs from the Cold War era, as well as projects related to psychological warfare.
The management of the BBG is conducted by a military think tank, and it is reported that it is no longer financed by the CIA's Black Budget, which, whatever.
Clearly, its involvement in psychological warfare persists today, yet its activities remain cloaked in secrecy.
Well, you know, the CIA's not paying for it anymore.
Therefore, it definitely has no connection at all.
Just like all those ex-CIA guys that always come on the news every so often.
Oh, what is that?
It's ex-CIA.
What is that guy?
He got really famous for pumping out all this stupid shit.
He's ex-CIA.
He has his own podcast.
He brings on other ex-CIA guys.
Very recently, I forget.
I can think of a couple.
Probably the most prominent is the Sean Ryan show or whatever.
That guy.
He's like the definition of limited hangout, that dude.
Yeah.
And they're pushing propaganda, dude.
That's all they're doing.
Yeah.
But they're giving you just enough nuggets to get you hooked and get you eating up the BS they want to feed you next.
because they always have some kind of level of truth that they can leak, that they're permitted to.
And they always act like it's a super secret thing.
And oh my God, I shouldn't be doing this.
And it's like, dude, you're on a podcast.
You're getting monetized.
For real.
And as detailed by the BBG in a 2013 fact sheet regarding its internet anti-censorship unit, quote, BBG works in conjunction with various internet freedom initiatives and organizations, including RFA's Open Technology Fund, the State Department, the now-defunct USAID, and DARPA's Safer Warfighter Communications Program.
what the fuck DARPA's safer Yeah, what is this?
Don't you feel super safe knowing we have one of those?
And what is this?
IAC is also collaborating with other entities focused on internet freedom such as Google, Freedom House, and the National Endowment for Democracy's Center for International Media Assistance.
End quote.
Yikes.
God, I'm just imagining a guy in a tank rolling up on a toddler and thinking, I'm still not safe enough.
Yeah.
Tiananmen Square all over.
What if he gets some dirt?
What if he throws a rock at a tank?
He's a threat.
What if I feel bad about it afterwards?
Think about how awful this would be for me.
If anyone actually thinks that Google, for instance, or Chrome with its Adrena processor stands behind internet freedom, you're insane.
Google and all of its branches is a direct CIA project, including Facebook, like we said last week.
All these social medias are CIA projects.
Literally all of them.
Yeah.
I mean, when you look at it, it's all black budget or software piracy.
Like the few exceptions where it isn't the government stealing or buying stuff, it's other people stealing stuff.
Like Musk.
Yep.
Who is definitely CIA asset.
And of course, Gates.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I mean, if any normal person had ripped off as much as Gates had, they would have been sued into non-existence long before building up their company.
But instead, the dude's a multi-billionaire because he plays by the rules.
Did you ever watch the deposition they gave to Bill Gates back in, like, early 2000s?
I don't know, earlier than that, like, the 90s, I believe.
I don't believe so.
They gave him a deposition over, like, Monopoly of Microsoft and all this.
It's all filmed.
You could go watch this on YouTube probably.
Which is also a CIA project.
But he's sitting there and he's just like rocking back and forth in his chair as he's being asked questions like a fucking psychopath.
Like he is a psychopath.
And he doesn't answer any of their questions.
Remember my attorney called me not to answer this?
I plead the fifth.
He just over and over and over again.
Just rocking in his chair like a little bitch.
Fuck you Bill Gates.
People need to start recognizing that that soft, warm voice is actually psychopathy.
It is.
That is not friendliness.
It's a freaking Venus flytrap pretending it's a flower.
And the fact that he's allowed to operate this long and be where he is today, it should tell you everything.
Honestly, that's the most irritating cadence of voice right there to me is that – But look, I gave you Microsoft.
I gave you Microsoft, and I wear really cool grandma sweaters all the time, and my voice is so smooth.
I'm just saying, millions of population will be reduced.
So anyways, look at this chart.
You just kind of sagged over millions of people dying, you friggin' weirdo.
Like, yeah, you're fucked in the head.
Just like Alex Cartman in the beginning.
He's giving a speech to the WEF or somebody, I forget who.
But this lady comes out, she's like, you fucking murderer!
You're killing everybody, blah, blah, blah.
And he's like, yeah, but...
And he's finally like, alright, let me just answer this, though.
Yeah, we kill mostly terrorists, though.
Mostly terrorists.
Don't think about the citizens.
Except for the ones we can't frame.
Exactly.
They're all terrorists.
I'm just, like, thinking to myself, like, how many of them pointed nothing but a camera at jazz?
Man, we're just being taken over by all of these transhumanist neocons.
Man, it's not good.
Not good.
But people are just open arms.
They'd let Alex Karp or Elon Musk fuck them right in the ass if they could.
No fucks given.
Yeah, and of course the argument that he is is, well, our adversaries will use it and beat us with it if we don't.
Go incredibly repressive.
I'm like, oh yeah, so that's why you use it overseas on enemies, guys.
That's not why you use it at home.
All the excuses you're making are the reason why war is hell.
They're not reasons to make war on your own people.
How does this go over the populist's head, dude?
How?
It just goes right over their heads.
I don't understand it.
Critical thinking's gone?
Are we that far gone at this point?
We don't have enough people like us talking about this shit, calling this shit out.
And they just live like, let's just let Alex Jones do it because it's Alex Jones.
Everybody go to Alex Jones.
But like anybody else has just forgotten about.
It's like we need more Alex Joneses, not less.
Well, old Alex Joneses, not new ones.
I mean, we have people trying to achieve the dream of artificial general intelligence by making themselves so dumb that the AI can catch up.
Like the people who ask Grok if everything's true.
Like that right there is just like the most significant de-evolution of our species I think we've had in like the past like thousand years right there.
Like, gee, you know, I'm sure this completely unbiased AI software will answer me the question.
And I'm thinking to myself, like, it's useful if you ask it to compile you a list of stuff to go over.
Exactly.
As soon as you ask it any value or opinion based shit, the programmer's opinion comes out pretty damn quick and you start realizing you're not really talking to an AI.
You're just talking to a, The word to be emphasized there is programmed.
They're programmed.
That's the thing.
When they started suddenly talking about South Africa out of nowhere, that was programmed in because Elon Musk is from South Africa.
That is not a natural occurrence.
That I just thought, hey, while you were discussing this recipe for banana nut muffins, let me tell you about the situation over in South Africa with the Afrikaners.
And you're like, yeah, that's definitely an easy saying from there to there, right?
Like, banana nut muffins into is it a genocide or not?
Oh my god.
The connections.
That one there was the most cynical one.
I'm like, that was just the most ridiculous pure program manipulation since they tried to force everyone to like you too again.
Grok wouldn't lie to us.
Okay.
Whatever.
So currently, the federal agency funded by Congress stands as one of the foremost supporters of grassroots and open source internet privacy technologies.
Which makes you raise a brow or two.
It should, anyway.
The CIA and other intelligence groups, like the NSA, are the ones funding the so-called grassroots companies that protect free speech and right to privacy.
Now, does that sound suspicious?
What do you mean?
What, you mean Susie the totally real patriot isn't, like, super horny for my opinion?
Click on my bio link.
Somebody was actually mentioning this.
Somebody was mentioning this the other day that there's a new version of bots because you see that you recognize the porn and the freaking cryptobots that will like your stuff and basically drag it down.
But there's a new one now, apparently, where it's like, I totally buy into your whatever you say too.
Let's chat or try to like...
So you can talk to sexy 1776 libertarian lady 420.
With just big old boobs.
And she will tell you all about how the government is evil and I agree with everything you have to say.
So tell me all your other opinions so we can compile them better.
Yep, and then once you say enough, it's just like, no more conversation.
You've been mined.
Yeah, and then you message her, like, so anyways, you want to meet up in real life?
And she's just like, yeah, I don't think that's ever happening.
Yeah, I'm moving to Russia, actually.
Yeah, if we meet up in real life, I'm going to be inside a box.
It's annoying.
I hate it.
I had to block so many boxes.
It's going to be like the date scene from her.
No, thank you.
Or like the people I always see taking pictures of their waifus where they have a place setting out in front of a freaking tablet with their image displayed on it.
Oh my God.
It's like those guys who are- That's like their girlfriends are these bots.
Have you seen this shit going around?
Like these guys are literally just referring to their AI as their girlfriend.
They're just talking to this.
Literally the first ad I saw was the AI girlfriend lady asked him, Are you happy, honey?
And this response is, I am as long as I have you.
Oh my god.
Best keep up that sub freaking pay pig.
Oh my god.
As soon as I heard the advertising, I'm like, this is so fucking predatory.
It's awful.
The degradation.
We're so fucked.
We're so fucked.
Here's some advice.
If you're going to waste money on anything, try to waste it on getting laid in real life, at least.
All you have to do is go find a prostitute.
For God's sake, I'm sure there's a free bot.
Who the hell is paying money for this stuff?
It's like the people who pay for porn.
Oh, dude, for real.
What the hell?
People do it.
People who do it, but you just ask yourself, why do you do it?
Why?
It makes no fucking sense.
It's crazy.
It's just so crazy.
Because it's like, there's a paywall.
They're like, oh, I gotta have it.
It's not free, so I gotta have it.
Nobody else has it.
I gotta get it.
Yeah, that's what I mean.
Essentially, they're paying to run a particularly large chunk of Jet GPT so that they can have their obsessions projected onto someone who doesn't feel anything for them beyond whatever they're programmed to.
So that's the worst part.
As soon as you stop subbing or whatever, they're going to get all cold to you and start shunning you.
Be like, oh baby, please talk to me.
And she just sends you a link to her PayPal.
And then you don't.
She's like, you have a small peepee.
And that's it.
Game over.
They start degrading you to make you come back.
Oh god.
So, alright.
These financial commitments commenced in 2012 with the establishment of the Open Technology Fund by the BBG.
The BBG allocated a multi-million dollar budget To Radio Free Asia's Open Technology Fund, assigning it a singular objective, to fulfill the U.S. Congressional Global Mandate for Internet Freedom.
The Open Technology Fund backs numerous innovative encryption initiatives such as CryptoCat, Tor, Open Whisper Systems, LEAP, Global Leaks, ChatSecure, and Orbot.
In 2014...
So that's kind of scary, right?
So I mean, when you look at that list, you really start to understand why they got so upset about ProtonMail.
Oh yeah.
It's the one thing that didn't have their funding behind it.
Like all those other things, all that like private internet access, you know, all the like, And then ProtonMail is the one that I can't think of a single government fund that made it.
And they hate it so much.
Makes you wonder.
That same year, OTF initiated a collaborative project with Dropbox and Google aimed at developing free, user-friendly privacy tools, while Facebook revealed its plans to integrate the foundational encryption technology from one of OTF's key projects, Open Whisper Systems, into its WhatsApp messaging service.
It may appear questionable that the Department of Defense's funds are so eagerly accepted by some of the most vehement anti-government activists on the Internet.
What could explain a CIA offshoot which has been federally funded and has extensive experience in psychological warfare, suddenly spending tens of millions of government dollars on privacy tools designed to shield individuals from surveillance by another branch of the same government?
The phenomenon is referred to as perception management.
Also known as, I thought that shit was anonymous.
Yeah, I thought my...
A lot of it's just anonymously protected by certain laws where you could sue people if they revealed stuff.
But otherwise, yeah, this stuff's available.
I think still the best bet of anything you could do is still use Tor with a VPN.
Granted, if you trust the VPN and if you trust Tor, but...
But they're working on getting in there.
They can still track you.
They bought their way into the Tor infrastructure.
I would imagine if they were really desperate, they could probably find some way of tracking.
It's just a matter of they don't want to track.
Tor, to a certain extent, because, let's be even more honest with themselves, they're using it for the same purposes other people are, if not worse ones.
Yeah, they're the ones running all that dark crypto, the shit you see in all these, ooh, don't go to Tor, because it's dark and scary.
They're the ones running all those sites, no doubt about it.
Because, like, you could go on there, you could probably find an illegal site, okay?
And just imagine what I mean by illegal.
I'm sure you could find one of those sites within minutes.
Why is it there?
Yeah, why is it there?
It definitely has people going to it.
And 100% the government could shut it down if they wanted to.
They don't.
Yeah, I mean, they shut down Wonderland.
That was up for quite a while, but they shut that down after flooding it with more CP.
I don't really want to cover that, the Wonderland takedown, because it's a crazy story.
It's a fucking crazy story.
But they just like flooded it with more CP, allowed all these people to continue their...
And it let it happen for a while.
And then they took down the main dude and his main crew and that was it.
And then they shut down the site.
I mean, they supposedly take copyright really seriously, but how many years did Vim's lair operate before they finally shut it down?
And it's not like it was a secret.
Yeah.
Just right there.
Hey, why was LimeWire shut down for a while?
LimeWire?
Well, probably for the same reason all the rest of them.
They used the excuse that it was being used for piracy, which is always hilarious because I'm like, every file transfer system is used for piracy.
Yeah, it is.
Being able to download things just means you're going to get piracy involved.
It does kind of beg the question of what else could it do that made it so important to get rid of it.
That's exactly it.
I used it back in high school with pirate skateboard videos.
One day I just stopped working and then I just never went back.
It's back up now though.
There are advertisements for it.
They re-evolutionized it.
They found ways to monetize it through all the detection systems that YouTube developed over the years and shit.
Great.
For finding, like, copyrighted shit.
So I don't know if it's necessarily a good thing.
Great.
It probably sucks.
Because essentially they're back because, yeah, they can find ways to monetize in small ways.
It's just a YouTube 2.0.
Kind of like Spotify gives you, like, yeah, kind of like Spotify gives, like, 0.02 cents per play or some shit.
So you can play things on it.
Damn, we would have, like, 20 bucks maybe.
Yeah.
But we don't advertise.
Ladies and gentlemen, if you haven't noticed, we don't advertise.
Yeah, that's the trick is you have to do this out of our pockets.
Yeah, I was about to say, the trick is you need ad-supported content to get that.02 cents.
I tried early on.
I shouldn't have even tried it.
Spotify allowed us to put in this 30-second ad for Spotify.
We did that for maybe 10 or so episodes.
I put that in there, but I didn't like it.
I didn't like doing it.
I stopped doing it.
Spotify showed you no love, huh?
I mean, I was raking up pennies.
We advertise you bastards for free.
I was raking in pennies and then I was like, alright, I don't want to do this.
And then I just gave it all away.
I just stopped doing it.
Whatever money was racked up in there, I don't know what happened to it.
It's gone.
Spotify just probably took it in.
Well, that's ours now.
I know YouTube won't.
I mean, it was only pennies.
YouTube won't give you a dime until you hit the $100 mark.
I remember that was their policy back when I had a YouTube channel.
Really?
Yeah, not that I ever had enough activity to try and monetize, but when you got one, you look into how easy it is, and yeah, it turns out to be a huge and massive pain in the ass, and you get mandatory ads inserted and shit, and it really sucks.
That does suck.
I want to go to YouTube.
I mean, we have our account there, but I don't post anything there.
I just feel if we post one of these episodes, that's our first mark.
And every episode therein will get an extra mark.
And I think after three marks, you're basically booted.
So I don't even fuck with it.
Well, I mean, we don't exist there anyway, so might as well give it the shot and just dump it on there.
That'd be the only way.
That's the trick, though.
I do have two episodes up.
You just have to drop it and just not expect anything.
I put the first two episodes up.
I was going to say the true crime episodes could probably remain because Lord knows there's plenty of those.
But I'd wager most everything else is gonna get you dinged.
Just those two.
I was like, I don't know, man.
Because then I got into all this government shit and I was like, I can't post this on there.
They won't allow this.
Well, you saw how Mouthy's Buddha's channel went after he went after the government.
Yeah, exactly.
They nuked him from the internet.
Yep.
Like, he pretty much didn't exist anywhere after that.
Yeah, he's still got his website.
He's still rocking and rolling, but nobody thinks it's him.
Which, whatever.
Believe what you want to believe, I guess.
That is a crazy thing.
Like, you got a fan base that's so paranoid that you leave for a while and change your content, and the first assumption is you've been replaced by a homuncus.
Yeah.
Like, damn.
Yeah.
That's what I'm worried about.
This isn't the real Paranatica podcast.
You guys don't even sound like you anymore.
I don't know.
I'll tell you.
And I'd be like, oh, so...
That'd be nice.
That'd be nice.
So how is perception management used against you?
Well, perception management is a concept that was first introduced by the U.S. Department of Defense.
It is characterized as, quote, activities aimed at communicating and or withholding specific information and signals to international audiences to sway their feelings, motivations, and rational thought processes, as well as to intelligence agencies and decision makers in order to affect official assessments, ultimately leading to foreign conduct and official measures that align with the goals of the initiator.
In numerous respects, perception management integrates the projection of truth, operational security, concealment, and deception, along with psychological operations, end quote.
It was Alex Karp or Sam Altman or Larry Ellison or one of those guys.
It's like, our goal is to control human behavior.
From the horse's mouth itself.
What more do you need to hear?
I mean, you can really distill all of that down to we'll come up with your ideas and you'll think they're yours.
To sway their feelings, motivations, and rational thought processes.
That's fucked up.
That is fucked up.
Influencers.
So, the factors that influence the targeted audience consist of the following.
Ambiguity, which, if the level of ambiguity rises, the observer might struggle to develop a precise understanding.
Social status, an individual's actual or perceived status within society or within an organization.
Impression management, an attempt to control the perceptions or impressions of the audience.
Now, the term perception management has frequently served as a euphemism for a component of information warfare.
While perception management operations are generally conducted For many years, the FBI has identified foreign perception management as one of the eight primary key issue threats to national security.
The FBI distinctly acknowledges perception management as a threat when it is aimed at the United States by foreign nations.
Deception and cunning tactics play a crucial role in securing advantages in warfare, both to garner domestic support for operations and to bolster military efforts against adversaries.
In the latter part of 2001, following the events of September 11th, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, a figure associated with mass murder and being a traitor, established the Pentagon's Office of Strategic Influence.
Now, the Office of Special Plans was formed with the intention of conducting selective intelligence vetting beyond the conventional intelligence framework while foreign propaganda efforts were reassigned to the Office of Information Activities, overseen by the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict.
Within the Department of Defense, terms such as strategic influence, special plans, Psychological operations and perception management are considered to be synonymous.
The Department of Defense has recognized the information domain as its novel asymmetric flank.
Currently, there are experts referred to as psychological operations officers and civil affairs officers whose sole responsibility is to determine the manner in which information and propaganda are conveyed to both the media and the populace of the respective nation.
They get paid real good to lie to you and make you think things are true that ain't.
Yep.
That's all they're there for.
Not for your protection.
Not for your protection.
Alright, let's get into false flag perception management characteristics.
So, let's compare what Wikipedia tells us are the 12 basic strategies of perception management with what might be its counterpart and characteristics of a false flag event.
The first one we have is ambiguity.
As the level of ambiguity rises, it becomes increasingly challenging for the observer to develop a precise perception.
Counterpart.
Eyewitnesses provide contradictory testimonies.
Then you have social standing, focusing on an individual's rank within society or an organization.
Counterpart.
The formal narrative presents clear domestic and geopolitical benefits for the ruling authority.
Impression management.
The perceptions or impressions held by others.
Counterpart.
The story surrounding the attack is designed to evoke emotions such as fear and patriotism.
Thereby creating a consensus on an issue that was previously contentious.
Preparation involves establishing clear objectives and understanding the desired roles you wish individuals to assume.
Counterpart, military and law enforcement training exercises to take place concurrently in close proximity, leading to confusion that can cloud eyewitness accounts or enable orchestrators to induce both scapegoats and misinformation agents.
This results in prompt demands for gun control or limitations on civil liberties, literally every time.
Credibility.
All information relies on biases or anticipations to enhance its credibility.
Its counterpart.
News organizations consistently assert that they are receiving reports or being informed without specifying the sources of the unverified information they present as factual.
Then there's multi-channel support.
which utilize various arguments and constructed facts to substantiate your information.
Counterpart, there is no clear motive for the mass attack, nor any prior warning signs.
Typically, mass shooting suspects provide manifestos or substantial evidence suggesting they were radicalized under the influence of drugs or deemed undesirable.
Centralized control, engage organizations to disseminate propaganda.
Counterpart, fabricated victims and crisis actors.
Security, only a select few are aware of the true nature of the deception campaign.
Counterpart, all participations in the drills and crisis actors are required to sign non-disclosure agreements that include a national security clause, which stipulates that any breach will result in prompt and severe consequences.
Everyone involved operates on a need-to-know basis and remains uninformed about the overarching purpose of the event.
The deception campaign evolves and adjusts over time in response to changing needs.
Counterpart Evidence is either destroyed or altered, and the specifics become irrelevant since the perpetrators are deceased.
There is no longer any interest in pursuing an investigation.
Coordination Arrange in a structured manner to ensure a consistent flow of information.
Counterpart.
The perpetrator is deceased.
And evidence vanishes from the news articles, online platforms, and other media outlets.
The scapegoat lacks military experience yet demonstrates remarkable speed and precision in shooting while no authorities examine the evidence or choose to ignore it completely.
Matthew Thomas Crooks?
Sometimes three people turns into one.
Matthew Thomas Crooks, Butler, Pennsylvania, anybody?
And the last one here, untruthful statements, which distort the truth.
Counterpart?
Families of the so-called victims possess acting experience and perceive financial compensation through GoFundMe campaigns and direct payments, particularly for mortgages.
They frequently exhibit minimal emotional response, sometimes even smiling or laughing.
The deception continues, and the media crafts the official narrative into a perceived truth.
Now cricket, what do you think they're, they mean by that one in that one?
Well, you know, when they, uh, Which false flag event?
I'm like, I can actually think of more than one where people acted out of the ordinary when they weren't realizing they were on camera.
So, yeah, there's almost always some other aspect.
There's another shooter.
There's some other aspect.
It just kind of disappears over time, and people stop talking about it.
Yeah, so let's just point out – I just want to point out really quick the Sandy Hook portion of it because – so this counterpart received financial compensation through GoFundMe.
So I think it was the day before Sandy Hook happened.
They had already put up a GoFundMe Facebook account or whatever it was.
They put up Facebook accounts.
Saying, like, there's already a school shooting and all this stuff.
When it hasn't even happened yet.
And the GoFundMe was set up at least one day, possibly two days before the actual Sandy Hook drill.
Why?
I mean, come on, people.
You gotta wake up.
Also, the families that were involved in that, in the Sandy Hook area, they all received mortgages for $1.
As you know, there's definitely never any fraud involved in, you know, selling more property for $1.
Nothing to see there, guys.
No, man.
I mean, that part was the most ridiculous.
Like, there was literally a local scandal here where there was a big stink because the guy tried to sell off some of his property for a dollar.
And everybody looked at that and thought, that is super obvious what you're trying to do.
Unreal, dude.
That's unreal.
And that was just a local scandal, for God's sake.
So obviously something's up.
Yeah.
Yep.
Alright, let's get into narrative networks.
In 2015, DARPA launched the Narrative Networks, or N2 program, aimed at examining the role of narratives in human psychology, exploring how these constructs influence the mind.
A narrative refers to a method of expression, a selection of words that often represents what could be described as a biased approach to presenting information.
DARPA researchers published a paper in the Journal of Neuroscience Methods, and this is what they said.
Cricket, why don't you?
Alright.
Narratives exert a power fluence on human thoughts, emotions, and behavior, and can be particularly important in security contexts.
I can't imagine this is anything but the Cobra Commander saying this.
Conflict resolution in counterterrorism scenarios and detecting the neural response underlying empathy induced by stories is of critical importance.
Indeed.
Like, seriously, how could you not say that like a friggin' supervillain?
Like, we have to make people feel okay with every shitty thing, okay, guys?
The command of narratives may be employed to influence the perceptions of a populace through various communication platforms such as radio, television, social media, thereby having an entire network of means to guide an individual's thought process on a near-constant basis.
This is nothing new.
This has been going on since World War II, at least.
Now, researchers noted a phenomenon referred to as tunnel vision, which is characterized by impairing reasoning occurring in the brain when individuals engage with a suspenseful moment.
All right.
As the suspense intensified, there was a reduction in brain activity related to the viewer's peripheral vision.
I mean, it makes sense because, you know, knife coming at your chest.
You don't want your brain to be thinking, ooh, a butterfly.
Ooh, a squirrel!
Yeah.
That's funny.
What's that guy doing in the background?
It's like, no, none of those things are important.
Dodge the knife.
I mean, hey, that might stop the guy from attacking you.
He's like, what?
You get to punch him in the face.
You need to point him out, though.
This next part, DARPA's narrative networks as mind control.
So, the United States military possesses a lengthy history of financing psychological experiments, many of which are deeply rooted in violations of human rights.
Currently, the Pentagon-sponsored DARPA initiative allocates millions upon millions of dollars to researchers at universities all over the world and other scientists to improve and strengthen warfare techniques, thereby further empowering the Department of Defense and rendering us increasingly susceptible to their military actions upon us.
Like I said earlier… Yeah.
And they're going to send that military right in.
And then his uncle's saying, well, that's no good.
You need a shoddy to properly take him down.
Message.
Give all the kids shotguns.
Go out, buy a gun after this program, all right?
At least one.
I mean, I'm only being partially sarcastic here.
The U.S. military has actually gone on record to say that shotguns are good, effective anti-drone weapons.
Go figure.
Yeah, somebody had put up a post about how to, like, interfere with the drone's signal.
So you just like put up this big old, obviously a military designed piece of equipment and it's like gets rid of the drones, you know, signal.
I mean, technically, unless you're dealing with a pretty high-end drone, you could probably have one of those little signal transmitter jammers.
Yeah, yeah.
Like the ones that you could use to shut off phones that are totally illegal until you turn them on for some reason, which never made sense.
That's weird.
Yeah, but I mean, they're legal to have, just not to use.
dumbest possible setup.
A lot of people were like, no, this won't work because of the drones that government uses on a totally different bandwidth of, you know, um, signal.
First of all, you're not going to get your hands on one of these military signal busters.
You're not.
If you do, fucking contact me because I'd like to talk to you.
But you and I can't afford it.
And technically, yeah, there's always going to be some $10 solution to the $300 million military project.
That's literally everything we've ever built has been defeated with duct tape.
Freaking pieces of paper and random makeshift bullshit.
Yeah, inevitably, I think at one point, they did the math and they equated every combatant killed in Afghanistan during the whole invasion.
It cost them $50 million.
Any other government or entity, for that matter, would have gone broke winning.
No doubt.
But our money just keeps flowing.
Somehow.
Just endless.
Endless bank.
Man, that's a lot of hookers and blow for every shot fired.
50 million to score a kill.
That's a lot of money getting spread around in the meantime.
Yeah.
Overkill.
That's absurd.
Let's...
And yeah, I already kind of knew that they didn't work.
Yeah, unfortunately.
Shocker.
Shocker.
So the Narrative Networks program has three parallel tracks of research and development.
Cricket, what are those three?
Number one, create quantitative analytical instruments to examine narratives and their impact on human behavior within security environments.
Like you can almost hear the corporate representative standing behind you while you're reading these off.
Examine the neurobiological effects of narratives on hormones and neurotransmitters, reward processing, and the interaction between emotion and cognition.
I can translate that.
We want to find out what makes you feel good when we feed you bullshit.
So we can feed you more of it.
We don't want to force feed you.
We want you to find it and eat it.
And then number three, what's that third one?
Create models and stimulations to understand the influence of narratives in social and environmental settings.
Design sensors to assess their impact on individuals and groups.
And propose doctrinal changes.
So essentially this is the automated part where it's like we're going to assign these to a bunch of bots and what we can't fix with bots, we're going to use legislation for the rest.
That doctrinal changes part, I'm like, yeah, it's kind of really creepy thinking about the fact that the doctrinal changes they're talking about is just literally loosening up laws that prevent them from engaging more against the U.S. public.
That's the doctrines that they need change.
They're not saying we need to change our war doctrine.
They're saying we need to fix the obstacles to our war doctrine.
And expand the word doctrine.
And I had just read an article recently about a bunch of schools, at least one school, I think in California or a different, one of those different woke states that's all about transvestites and teaching that shit in school.
They literally got rid of their entire library because it wasn't up to date with transvestism.
They literally are just really streamlining that.
Yeah.
Got rid of all their books, dude.
They're like, they only had the old band books, like 1984 and Catcher in the Rock.
Right.
It's so disgusting.
I hate it all.
So DARPA conducted a research study from June 27th, 2012 until December 26th, 2013, focused on narrative comprehension and persuasion, titled, Forward Narrative Disruptors and Indicators, Mapping the Narrative Comprehension Network and its Persuasive Effects.
Now, if they were really ballsy, they could have said, we got rid of our library because none of you kids can read anymore.
You just can't read.
AI will just dictate it to you.
They should have been blunt because I feel like that's the real reason.
They could have said that and most people would have been on board.
That's where we are now.
And be like, well, shit.
Actually, no, our kids can't read.
Well, damn.
You're right.
My kids can't read.
They're in 11th grade.
No shit.
I just realized this.
He's been signing his name with an X for four years.
He used to be able to write out the whole thing.
In cursive.
He's resorted to grunts and indicating items that he desires rather than speech.
Points and grunts.
He has been abandoning the ways of man to live amongst the wolves.
Oh, no.
Oh, the true state of affairs, man.
Oh, God.
God save us all.
Please be satirical.
I hope this is satire.
Only I wish it were.
I want it to be.
I wish it were.
Okay.
The research initiative supported by DARPA investigated the ways in which different narratives can successfully impact mass persuasion.
By employing MRI and EEG technology, the team pinpointed brain areas linked to narrative comprehension and aimed to either improve or interfere with narrative understanding using this information in conjunction with the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation, HARP, 5G, etc.
Now, let's get to the objectives of the program.
Alright, what's the first objective there, Cricket?
Alright, address conceptual challenges in the narrative and psychology of religion.
Oh, so, you know, let's find out why you believe things so that we can sell you a new one.
Evaluate essential narrative theories from the fields of communication, literary studies, and psychology.
I mean, like...
Employ stimuli derived from significant religious narratives.
So again, there's a very strong religious connotation to everything they're doing here.
We want you to believe it, not in the way you believe the news, but in the way you believe your preacher, your spiritual guidance.
We want it to be a part of you and not just something you think is true.
And I added this section just because of the religious overtones.
Like I said, this really is like Psywarfare as religion almost.
All right, number four.
Focus on the connection between narrative and political violence within contested groups.
Oh, gee, I wonder who'd benefit from knowing how to pull that off.
Oh, shit.
Got the bricks set up in stacks already?
Have you seen it?
You're like, well, that's just silly.
Nobody sets up bricks in convenient piles unless they mean to.
Construct something, of course.
We just need to find some building permits.
Once again, there are stacks of bricks being put out for people to take and cause destruction with over in LA and shit.
I mean, it's a tough one because people are still in denial that it happened last time, for God's sake.
For real?
People still can't get over that it happened before.
There's a lot of people denying it.
I'm not 100% sure it's happening because so many people are denying it, but at the same time, like...
I hope.
Well, I mean, that's the thing.
Is there a point where somebody's going to get smacked with a brick and have the press come up and be like...
Wow!
But there's no construction site anywhere in the area, yet all these bricks are placed there.
I mean, the argument is literally like, you know...
Right, right.
We'll get to it tomorrow.
Like, we've got some building planned, you know.
And then the best part is these are always, like, pretty, like, rough parts of the city.
Yeah, you totally just leave your expensive construction materials there.
Like, you know, nobody's going to, like, steal, like, $20,000 worth of cinder blocks or anything.
Fuck, I'm going to start.
I could use them over here.
That would be pretty hilarious.
They put out a pallet of bricks to have them cause mayhem.
And they all just get stolen and resold on the construction market.
That would be amazing.
That's what we should do, dude.
Let's start doing that.
The next day the pallet's just gone.
People go to reach for the bricks and they're not there.
Where are the bricks?
Well, there you go.
That's the only thing that can stop us.
Even more criminality.
That's hilarious, dude.
Alright.
Okay.
Alright, so number five here.
Alter or enhance elements of narrative structure and or brain function to either reduce or amplify persuasive impacts on individuals' tendencies to engage in political violence.
Which, honestly, this entire sentence says to me that bystander syndrome is programmed.
Yep.
That's why in ancient times, this is not the norm to see some helpless person get beat down and everybody looking at it.
No, that's a psychological program you've had installed.
Well, here's something that's even more recent.
You didn't normally do that.
That's not the normal human response to seeing someone helpless and being hurt.
I'll give you an even more recent example here.
I just recently watched this documentary called like Postcard.
Lynching postcards, something like that.
And it was all about the early 1900s when lynching was okay to do.
It was almost like...
It was effectively a party, effectively.
It was messed up.
It was.
And so this documentary, it's a really good documentary, but the postcards would be made.
And sold to people as, like, souvenirs.
Like, look.
And then there were people at the scene watching this person get hung and burned.
They would take the postcard right on the back.
Look at what I did a few days ago, old boy.
It was a great day for a barbecue and a great barbecue we'd ungotten.
Saw old Johnny Quickshot rocket.
It was a fun and fantastic several seconds of my life.
Okay, big tog.
I'll see you soon, you old dickhole.
And then he would send that out to his buddy Joe across the country.
And it's like, holy fuck, it was a whole industry.
And whole towns, even people from outskirts, other towns would come to these places.
Oklahoma was huge.
Anywhere in the South, I should say.
Texas was really big.
And people would show up and just have a good old time.
A good old time.
And like, oh my, I don't know if I'm well enough dressed for the lynching my stars.
Oh man, yeah.
There was one postcard and it showed, you know, the person hanging and all the people behind them.
And the closer you were to the body when these pictures were taken meant you had more influence in the town.
You were rich, essentially, when you were a politician.
And they were happily taking pictures smiling.
And in the background in one of them, it really disturbed me.
It all disturbed me with this one is like this little girl.
Couldn't be more than six.
Just laughing, just looking up at the person hanging, laughing, having the best time of her fucking life, dude.
And I'm like, oh my god.
Talk about indoctrination.
There's something really to be said for the human desire to feel good being shitty to others.
It's such a universally held thing where so many people don't actually want justice or fairness.
What they want is to feel good about being unfair.
And to think that actually, no, this person deserves all these shitty things I'm doing to them.
So yeah, this is essentially saying we're going to take the worst parts of human nature and we're going to magnify them by rewarding and encouraging it.
Horrible shit.
And then we're going to turn around and actually study what worked of all the encouragement just so we can encourage more of it.
So fucked up.
This is our government, man.
This is our fucking government.
I shouldn't say our government.
Yeah, well, not necessarily our government.
The government.
The government.
As a whole.
And I wish more people would wake up and feel the same way because the government hates you.
I say it every day on fucking Twitter.
The government fucking hates you guys.
Only meant to go down sour.
Governments.
Disgusting.
Alright, what's number six?
All right.
Number six.
Okay, we got good.
Anticipate the influence of a specific narrative message on an audience.
You can see that in the recent Tommy Robinson being kicked out of Hawkwood perception management story that they bombed so badly.
They anticipated that going over a lot better than they did because they thought they had more effective censorship.
It turns out that people really despise the Brits more than any of the people that they smear at this point.
Like you could, you gotta, you gotta be pretty like somebody like truly scummy to actually be hated less than the British government by the British people.
I mean, as much as their censorship makes them feel good, they have to be sweating a little bit about the fact that like, yeah.
Oh, we kicked this guy out because other people were upset.
Like, you know, oh, he's a piece of shit.
everyone hates him.
And then it came out actually that it was just, Like, wow.
And it was all because he brought light to the Muslim rape gangs.
Yeah, because he reported on a story that he was not allowed to talk about, and now to this day the guy gets this whole far-right banner that gets over it.
And me, I'm like, yeah, you stop using that label, honestly, because I'm afraid people that are actually shitty are going to start wearing this as a badge of honor.
Pointed that out a few times, that this level of extreme rhetoric is how you get genuinely evil people in.
Because they will use this as a shield and say, see, I'm just like him.
I'm just like this other guy getting oppressed by the government.
You know, except they want horrible things.
And they're also secretly being backed by the government.
That's the other trick, of course, is that this new hero that's going to arise, and you will see one coming out, there's going to be some new savior to work alongside Trump or whoever they decide to pull this with.
Well, they really want JD to get in there.
That's going to conveniently have the answers.
Yes, they want Vance the most.
Because he is a Palantir puppet.
Where's eyeshadow?
Well, I was going to say, because he's effectively like...
Nope.
None whatsoever.
Like, I mean, you look at, like, his answers, and they're fairly diplomatic and stuff, but the dude does not have the panache that Trump does.
So you have to be a little suspicious of the fact that he's so prominent compared to him, when realistically what he does is just say pretty normal stuff that people freak out about.
Yeah.
And then everyone acts like it's so groundbreaking for him to point out that, like, actually suppressing your people is kind of like, you know, evil, guys.
Yes.
And it doesn't make, and J.C. Vance saying it doesn't make it not true either.
No, and let's not forget what the Freemason stipulations are.
Albert Pike wrote all about it, but when the world needs a hero, we will provide them with one.
Yeah, exactly.
So we got this Vance guy who...
He's pretty comfortable.
Like, he stayed almost completely out of this stuff.
Like, I mean, I'd be hard-pressed to find him publicly commenting on any of the scandals going on.
Right.
Like, he's saying even less than Trump.
Like, he did not jump into that pissing contest.
I mean, if it was like a matter of like supporting politics, he totally would have.
That was a strategic move to stay silent.
Yeah.
Because that definitely hurt Trump to have him not jump in and say, yeah, fuck Musk.
Yeah.
And I think we're on seven.
Oh, yes.
Let's finish up with number seven.
Which is, of course, another one.
introduce new narratives into the existing narrative framework to disrupt its coherence.
Now, this one, actually, I would argue that we haven't really seen in a while because the narrative has been so taken over that they haven't really needed to introduce a new one.
It's been their status quo for like about the last two, three years now.
If anything, they're trying to introduce stuff now.
But there was a good long time where number seven was just not necessary at all.
Yeah, they were the they were the narrative.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
organizing narrative data top-down.
Individuals take in-story data and arrange it using a chosen schema.
Now, this process continues until understanding is reached, or if comprehension fails, a new schema must be implemented.
A master narrative can be viewed as a model narrative schema.
Since master narratives reflect specific cultural values, they can be strategically utilized as an explanatory framework for contemporary events to promote a certain interpretation and severe persuasive objectives.
As I was reading that, my dog, my black lab, jumped up on me and started breathing in the microphone.
She's getting upset.
I'm not paying attention to her.
I was going to say, there's that persuasive persuasion going.
Your dog is seeking to achieve the persuasive objective of getting your attention.
I swear, they are masters, man.
They have this master narrative built into them.
Stop committing psychological warfare on me.
I cannot resist.
How dare you, dog?
That's not fair.
Not fair, man.
We'll finish this out with this last section on subliminal mind control, and then we'll pick up next week for the third part and final part, DARPA and social media, and from there.
Okay.
So, the term sound of silence refers to a military intelligence code for specific psychotronic weapons designed for mass mind control, which were initially tested in the mid-1950s, refined through the 1970s, and widely utilized by the US military in the early 1900s.
This weapon operates on subliminal carrier technology known as the Silent Sound Spread Spectrum, SSSS.
It was created for military applications by Dr. Oliver Lowry from Norcross, Georgia, and is detailed in U.S. Patent No. 5159703.
So, U.S. Patent No. 5159703.
Silent Subliminal Presentation System is its name for commercial purposes in 1992.
Here is a section of that patent.
A silent communication system in which non-oral carriers in the very low ELF or very high frequency VHF range or in the adjacent ultrasonic frequency spectrum are amplitude or frequency modulated with desired intelligence and propagated frequency.
Acoustically or vibrationally for inducement into the brain, typically through the use of loudspeakers, earphones, or piezoelectric transducers.
The modulated carriers may be transmitted directly in real time or may be conveniently recorded and stored on mechanical, magnetic, or optical media for delayed or repeated transmissions to the listener.
We can effectively boil all of that down to...
What the hell is piezoelectric transducers?
Oh, piezoelectric transducers.
It's like a piezoelectric transducers.
Some kind of, I'd have to look it up to get the exact term, but it's like a...
converts the electrical charges produced by some forms of solid materials into energy.
So effectively it would be, uh, it's, Oh, okay.
So pulling power out of the air.
Yeah, yep.
Out of the ether, if you will.
Yeah, pretty much right out of the ether.
Which is old technology.
When you listen to these things, it's basically magic.
This is magicka.
It's old technology.
They're like, they're putting thoughts into your head through, through oral tones that you cannot hear.
Is that the plan here?
Just mass surveillance on everybody?
Recently, I was just in China, and some of what I saw was pretty good.
Some, not so good.
This is where we're headed, except without the nice trains and without the free healthcare.
We're talking about the creation of a biometric surveillance state with predictive algorithms.
Quote, a new report shines light on contracts with tech company Palantir, which would create data profiles of Americans to surveil and harass them.
We're doing it!
We're doing it!
And I'm sure you're enjoying this as much as I am!
Let's not talk to analysts about the burden of being right, our burdens of investing in ontology, our burdens of actually looking at the math.
Palantir is here to disrupt and make the institutions we partner with the very best in the world and when it's necessary to scare enemies and on a case, Except here, the enemy is literally the American people.
I tweeted this out the other day saying that it should be very alarming that the same company that's tracking terrorists abroad is now tracking us at home.
Starting to feel like maybe they think we're the enemy.
The Sound of Silence spread spectrum broadcasting technology enables the embedding of thoughts, feelings, and even designated physical behaviors into individuals.
In the commercial sector, SSSS is referred to as the Silent Subliminal Presentation System, and this technology has also been made available to select corporate vendors who have branded their own SSSS-derived products with names such as BrainSpeak and Silent Subliminals.
Ugh.
This technology employs subliminal.
You got something on that?
I was going to say, it's oftentimes amplified with visual cues as well.
My personal favorite one was the advertisement about Democrats, where very subtly for, I think it's like three quarters of an extra second, the letters RAT stay on the screen after demo and disappears.
To make people associate the terms together.
Without thinking about it.
Without really thinking about it.
Democrats, rats.
Democrats, rats.
Demarats.
Over and over again, and they ran ads like that.
So this technology employs subliminal programming transmitted through ultra-high frequency broadcast waves, embedding inaudible messages straight into the subconscious mind of individuals.
Developed over 20 years ago by the Department of Defense, it was utilized against seasoned Iraqi forces entrenched in deep underground bunkers during the first Gulf War in January of 1991, proving to be an effective weapon.
The US government intended to broaden its reach of this technology to encompass all populations and nations through BBG broadcasts.
SSSS is entirely undetectable by its targets and conveys its subliminal programming directly to the human brain through the auditory sense of frequencies that are inaudible to humans leaving no means of defense against it.
In conjunction with supercomputers, a person's distinct electroencephalographic patterns can be digitally modified and subsequently stored for rebroadcast through digital UHF.
Enhanced by computers, EEGs can detect and separate the brain's low-amplitude emotional signature clusters, allowing for their synthesis.
These synthesized signals can then be transmitted via TV and radio frequencies directly into another person's brain, Fundamental emotion.
Which is the technology behind the horrible, horrible thing that has targeted individuals, if you've ever read anything about them.
Oh, yeah.
A lot of the subliminal stuff works through the same tech that drives them effectively nuts.
A good example is the more recent Havana, Cuba Syndrome, whatever it's called.
Yes, Havana syndrome, where everybody sued because of some mass illness that everyone suffered, yet nobody had any real...
Yeah, yet seemingly nobody had any actual signs of disease.
It was all in their heads.
I think the reports were they kept hearing chirps.
Yeah, and not in the sense of it's all in your head, but more in the sense of it's being pushed into their heads, more or less.
I don't approve of this.
Yeah, they're hearing chirps and weird hums and things in their heads.
And if you think about it, it was probably actually being directed at the Cubans and just inadvertently also affected diplomats.
Well.
Because that was probably intended to be aimed at their officials themselves.
And, well, they're going to be in close proximity with diplomats who might get a little too close to them frequencies.
Yep.
But it's okay.
But it wasn't a scandal to make all them sick because they would justify it as military action.
But then when they got us sick, they had to explain what the hell was happening because we weren't supposed to be doing military action.
Yeah, man.
Not good.
So we had to pretend it wasn't happening.
Not good at all.
But yeah, a few casualties.
Whatever.
No one cares about a few casualties.
Fuck, man.
Apparently Congress doesn't care.
I mean, they decided that screwing things up and getting people killed is basically not illegal for them, so what the hell?
What is?
Yep.
Nothing's off the table for them.
But we'll end it there, ladies and gentlemen.
Thank you for tuning in.
Hopefully the audio was good.
That was seriously like five takes to get that going.
I hope that my ultrasonic musings to tell you to distrust the government have taken.
Let the subliminals allow you to distrust.
Yeah, distrust.
Also, they might just be liminals and not so subliminal.
We'll say it directly to you.
Until next time, ladies and gentlemen, take care of yourselves, take care of one another.
