Project Camelot - 3I/ATLAS -- THE ANALYSIS OF A TRAJECTORY WITH DAVID SEREDA AND JIMMY BLANCHETTE

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 15, 2025 - Project Camelot

01:50:36

3I/ATLAS -- THE ANALYSIS OF A TRAJECTORY WITH DAVID SEREDA AND JIMMY BLANCHETTE

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, we are live.
	Hi, everyone.
	I'm here with Jimmy.
	I'm sorry, with David Sareda.
	I thought Jimmy Blanchett was joining us, but he's not.
	And so, as usual, I had some rocky beginnings here, something strange going on.
	Can't explain it.
	At any rate, we're on the air.
	So, welcome, David.
	It's great to have you back.
	Let's just get into it right away here.
	Yeah, there's been huge updates on 3i Atlas.
	I mean, the first thing, is there a bit of a delay here?
	Are you hearing me all right?
	I'm sorry.
	You're hearing an echo?
	No, it's just it looks like my camera is really slow.
	Okay, so there are huge updates on 3i Atlas.
	The first thing I want to point out is there's been a complete blackout on all photography since approximately the 21st of July.
	So, that's three weeks out.
	And I'm going to go over the imagery later.
	I'm going to go over a transmission using the Jimmy Blanchette technique that I did to 3i Atlas, and the answer I got back was faster than the speed of light.
	And in fact, I'll share screen right now to Loeb's website where first you'll see.
	First, just look, let's just see how close it is right now.
	I mean, we got lots of time.
	So, let me show you at the speed of light for a radio signal right now.
	This is where 3i Atlas is on my share screen.
	Okay, so you can see right here, it's actually about just under 22 minutes away for a radio signal to go to reach Atlas and another 20 minutes back if it were to respond.
	And what's funny about this, because it's so close, this is actually quite funny, but if we look at Loeb's actual paper on his website, he says, Should we message 3i Atlas as if we need one of these giant radio telescopes?
	And you don't even need one watt in clean space to send it a message.
	And so, obviously, they've either tried or done it or they don't know how to do it.
	But he's talking about the idea of should we message 3i Atlas.
	I mean, it's so incredibly easy to do this.
	And thanks to many thanks to Jimmy Blanchett for showing us how to do this.
	I mean, with these amateur band radios, these Baofangs, what I did, let me show you what I did the other night.
	I'm going to show you the results and how intelligent this thing is.
	It's actually mind-blowing what it did.
	So, let me show you the signal that I sent it.
	Okay, let me ask you before we do that.
	Uh, Why are you saying that they, meaning, I don't know, you think, you know, Avi Loeb and his group or whoever you think is the secret space program, which is what I call it, and NASA, et cetera, they would know easily what you and Jimmy know.
	So why shouldn't they be able to communicate?
	If you can, they can't, right?
	Well, I don't think they really do.
	In fact, I read all of Loeb's papers.
	I don't think he's much of a technologist.
	He's somewhat like he set up UFO detectors all over the planet to monitor his theory of three-eye atlas dropping off, you know, sub-smaller spacecraft.
	He still attests to the size of this thing being 20 kilometers, and that's like 12 miles, even though other physicists are putting it smaller.
	And the geometry is extending beyond the nucleus.
	And he's talking about the nucleus.
	We can see real structure in the geometries beyond the nucleus.
	And I'll go over all these images that we have left over from the 21st of July, plus the color enhancements we did.
	Yeah, 20 kilometers is, yeah, 12 miles, you know, 12 and a half miles.
	Okay, but just to get back to this point, because we have to really, you know, let's be honest here.
	Avi Loeb and the secret space program and all of what's going on underground, above ground, undersea, off the planet, solar warden, all the things that I talk about and my whistleblowers talk about, and zillions of people out there actually talk about now, is obvious.
	You don't need to be a technologist.
	I mean, he's not working alone.
	None of these people work alone.
	They work in huge teams and they have all the money in the world.
	So of course they can communicate.
	If they say they can't, then they're lying.
	And so we need to pinpoint the law.
	Okay.
	So the question is: I mean, if you understand Carl Sagan's hypothesis in his book, Contact, that a very advanced civilization would communicate with us in a form of mathematics, but not necessarily just mathematics.
	I mean, that's.
	But you've already proven that's going on.
	Yeah, and I'm going to demonstrate that really clearly that it's already sending us clear messages, which I have here.
	But the main thing is the technique that Blanchett uses is actually in part discovered by Nicola Tesla.
	When Tesla at Colorado Springs in the late 1800s did experiments sending signals out to the inner solar system, he got responses in the form of what sounds, it initially sounds like Morse code, and only certain radios do this.
	This particular radio does this.
	So I will hold down the call button, point the antenna, less than around one watt of transmission power is all you need, pointing it in the position of three eye atlas, which is just above the southern horizon right now.
	And then when I hold the call button down, I enter a series of tones that are the orbital periods of the planets in my hyperdimensional model, which is here.
	This is what I did.
	So you're going to see the answer I got back.
	I mean, this is a great place to start.
	Okay, well, let me also say, if this goes back to Tesla, then we're talking, you know, 40, 70 years, whatever.
	I mean, come on, let's just be straight, straight up with the audience.
	What you know, they know, and they also surveil you guys to death and me and everyone else.
	And I mean, if you don't know that, then you just haven't been paying attention to the 20th century century, 20th century, 21st century, and so on.
	I mean, it's just insane.
	So let's not pretend they don't know.
	We are happy you're doing this, okay?
	But I think we need to acknowledge that these people are doing this and much more and not pretend that we're behind the times, you know, back in the.
	Oh, yeah, there is no doubt that they probably initiated a series of contacts.
	The question is whether they know about the nine hyperdimensional planets.
	What's interesting about that because Congressman Luna was just on Joe Rogan, and she's speaking in the same language I'm speaking right now, which is hyperdimensional beings, which therefore you could assume hyperdimensional planets.
	And she's a congresswoman who is speaking about this subject.
	I called her office this morning to try to get her this information.
	And so, what I did is I sent a tone in the frequency of the orbit of Earth and then my hyperdimensional planet 591.
	And I sent Mars and I sent virtues here, which is 956, which is a big number because this number 3i Atlas has already sent us.
	And I'm going to show you how it already sent us this number.
	So, what I did not do in my tones is send powers 2503 or dwarf planet series.
	I just sent 365.256, 591.
	Mars is 68698.
	That's the number of Earth days it takes for Mars to go around the Sun once.
	And hypothetical planet 956.
	That's all I sent it.
	And what I got back using the, I'll call it the Blanchette technique, is when my radio starts chirping in this Morse code, I'm using a frequency meter on my phone measuring the frequencies inside of the chirps.
	And here's what I got.
	I mean, this is freaking mind-blowing.
	So I got this number right here, which I'll do a share screen and show you, is the number for the next planet in my sequence.
	Instead of 2503, I got 2509.83, which is 99% within 99% of that number.
	And you know what's amazing about this number is that's where it is right now.
	It's crossing this orbit right now over the past several days.
	And in fact, I did another transmission last night and it sent me a whole bunch of numbers in and around this.
	So look at that number 250983.
	And let's go back to my chart and you'll see that this is the next number in the sequence.
	You see, powers 2503.
	So how did it do that?
	And it did it faster than light because remember, it takes 20 minutes for a radio signal to reach it and another 20 to come back.
	I also sent the signal out through my tree antenna network, which I used a stereo amplifier, running wires down the hillside to three huge trees.
	I've got coils and attached, my coils attached to the side of the trees, and I sent out those same numbers.
	So when I was, I did two transmissions.
	And the tree network one, to listen, because when you use a radio antenna, you send out and you listen.
	You send out and you listen at a certain frequency.
	But with my trees, I'm not using a frequency.
	I'm only sending the tones.
	And then I have wires coming, 300 feet of wire coming into my studio here.
	And I connect the wires to my feet.
	And what do I hear in my consciousness?
	We'll go to this paper here.
	And this is mind-blowing because this is almost like a bioelectric psychic radio using trees as an antenna.
	So we know from last time, you know, just to re you know, capture this presentation that the ratio between the timing of a Muamua, 21 Borisov, and 3i Atlas in their closest position to the sun, which is when they Reach perihelion dates are one to the golden ratio squared.
	And we went over this last time with Jimmy.
	So that sets the precedent that these three interstellar visitors are in harmony to golden ratio mathematics.
	So, what I did is I decided because I went into Loeb's paper right here, and I found the three eye Atlas is rotating on its own axis on its own axis.
	And according to Loeb, this isn't according to Loeb, Loeb is actually referring to another physics paper that was published by multiple physicists.
	Its rotational period is in hours, plus or minus 0.01 hours.
	So, what I did is converted that to minutes because minutes is a language.
	And it came to 969 minutes if I use 16.15 hours.
	And if I use 16.16 hours, it came to 969.9 minutes.
	Well, that's right within one of my hyperdimensional planets on the model I just showed you.
	I mean, it's 99% of it.
	But that happens to be the exact number of years that the oldest man in the Bible lived, mythically, you could say, because that could be a mythic number.
	He lived for 969 years.
	I mean, that's incredible.
	And in fact, his father, Enoch, lived for 365 years, and the ratio of 365 to 969 is also within one to the golden ratio squared because it's one to 2.6 by 4 instead of 2.618, right?
	So that means it's speaking in this golden ratio language, but it's also pointing with this number in rotational minutes to my hyperdimensional planet in my model, which is within 969 orbital days to go around the sun.
	Okay, but what is the name of that hyperdimensional?
	Okay, I'll show you.
	I've given it a name because what I did is I superimposed the model of the nines, meaning the nine levels of the angels on top of that.
	Of course, I don't know what its name is, but it is interesting.
	Here we go.
	I'll do a screen share.
	You see, instead of 969, my number is 956.
	And 956 is to 969.
	Let me just calculate it here.
	956 divided by 969 is 98.65%.
	So that is incredible data that its rotational axis and it sends me the next number in the sequence, which is here, which I'm calling angelic powers.
	Again, these upper nine were known to the ancient Egyptians, which was called the Aeneid.
	The Aeneid has two sets of nine: the lower nine, the familiar lower nine spheres in my model, and the upper nine are hyperdimensional.
	Now, this is this is the model that, again, started with my wife's death calling my name out at 591 days, and 591 to the golden ratio built this whole model.
	I can see all the planets plus I can see nine more above.
	The question is whether our physicists are understanding this.
	And listening to Congresswoman Luna today on Joe Rogan speaking in this new hyperdimensional interdimensional language, she's giving us a clue that very few people noticed that they know that these UAP UFOs are coming from a hyperdimensional space.
	And yes.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	This is interesting in terms of the way you talk about the mathematics and how it works.
	Okay.
	But according to, I was rereading the Wingmaker Naruta interviews, and Naruta is an expert on alien languages, believe it or not, as well as all the languages in the world.
	So that was one of his specialties when he worked for the ACIO.
	That is, you might call it a sort of subgroup related to NASA.
	I mean, not NASA, but NSA.
	So if you follow any of that information, he says that aliens communicate using mathematics, okay?
	Because all different cultures have different languages, but the language of mathematics, if I understand it, is universal.
	Yeah.
	It is in fact so that people will understand why you emphasize these numbers so much.
	There's two numbers in mathematics that don't care what your unit of measure is.
	So if I'm measuring the speed of light in metric, and the way you calculate a frequency is the speed of light divided by the wavelength.
	So let's say the wavelength is metric and the speed of light is metric.
	I'm going to get a frequency.
	Now, if I change the speed of light to miles per second, which is 186,282 miles per second, then my wavelength is in miles, right?
	I can convert the speed of light to feet.
	How many feet per second?
	Then my wavelength is feet.
	Regardless of the unit of measure, your frequency is always going to be the same.
	And so that makes it universal.
	If you change what a second is, it's still not going to change anything because the harmonic is going to be the same.
	The second type of mathematic equation that transcends all units of measure is ratio, proportion.
	And ratio and proportion give us harmony or disharmony.
	So that's what the golden ratio is.
	It's a mathematically proven harmony to exist.
	And in fact, at John Hawkins University doing studies on the human brain and Earth mammalia, you know, mammals from lions and tigers and bears and dolphins and measuring from the soft spot on the back of the soft spot on the top of the head to the back of the neck, from the soft spot to the bridge of the nose, humans were the closest to a golden ratio.
	And there is no one golden ratio because the golden ratio is like pi in that it's an ever-expanding formula that gets more and more and more precise as you get deeper into the formula, as does pi.
	So it's not, if you're approximate, if you're at 97, 98% in a calculation, you're pretty much spot on.
	And in fact, you can even see in Loeb's calculations of the orbital axis of it, it's plus or minus 0.0 something.
	So there's no such thing as 100%.
	So with me getting an answer, showing a number, that's the next number for a hyperdimensional planet in my sequence, that interests me scientifically and also spiritually, because we're using mathematics to see something that we can't see with our telescopes.
	But the data is saying there's something there.
	Now, if we look at its current position, let's go back to, but I do want you to talk about, I mean, I don't know if this changes the subject or not.
	I think it might be the same subject, but you have been sending me messages telling me about how Loeb seems to be saying that it's going to be stationary at some point and it may be speeding up and slowing down.
	And I think that's significant.
	So can you talk about that?
	Yeah, let's go back to that.
	Okay.
	So first, let me just show you where it is and I'll go to that because where it is right now, see, right now, I can, in this calculator, add dwarf planet Ceres, which to me is a Ceres is an asteroid in the asteroid belt.
	But you see how close we're getting to Ceres right now with three, and actually by the 21st, which is my birthday, turning 64, it'll be right there within the, and Ceres is in the golden ratio harmony of the planets in my calculation to a fairly high degree of accuracy.
	So, but planet 969 was only because remember, Mars is actually in here.
	So Mars is 68698 days.
	591, you see this purple line here, is exactly where it's headed for.
	And we talked about that last week.
	I have a lot of new stuff to show everybody today.
	And 969, which is, again, the orbital message, is here.
	And planet 2503 is we're pretty much there right now.
	So when it sent me back the number 2509, it means it's just a little bit past 2503 in my hyperdimensional model, which is right about here because Ceres is takes about just under 1700 days.
	Let me just double check to go around the sun.
	Yes, Ceres is 167981 days.
	You see?
	So 225, 2503 is not much further.
	If you're having a dialogue with this craft, when you say they came back to you with a certain number, what are they saying with that?
	Why are they saying that?
	They're saying that that's one where we are right now.
	So if the further my radius gets out from the sun, the number of days it takes that position, like Jupiter takes 4,332.58 days to go around the sun once.
	So it's just under 12 years.
	Okay, but saying I am right here.
	I mean, let's translate this into English.
	Okay.
	So you're saying these numbers, you're rattling those off, but what does it mean?
	Why are they saying that back to you?
	I mean, don't they're tracking them?
	Don't they?
	You know what I'm saying?
	I mean, what kind of an answer is that?
	It's saying there's intelligence here.
	We know you sent us a signal.
	And if I finish the calculation, it will dividing the number they sent me by the golden ratio, I end up at Earth.
	I have that all right here.
	I can show you that really quick, and then we'll go on to your calculator.
	So it's just telling you that it's on the way here.
	It's telling that there's intelligence there.
	I mean, that's just for the person.
	But do they think you're stupid?
	Don't you already know there's intelligence there?
	I mean, you know.
	But there's nothing like confirmation.
	Like, you know, if I have a conversation with a human being, most of the time I don't get an answer at all, right?
	If I go on Facebook and I try and friend somebody, I don't want to even get an answer back.
	So when you get an answer back, I think that means something.
	See, here's what I did here.
	I took my 969.6, which is in minutes, the orbital axis rotation of 3i Atlas, and divided by the golden ratio repeating, repeating, repeating.
	I have percentage like 98% of 98.623% of the orbit of Earth.
	But that's using this number.
	But I keep going, when I take 969.6 times the golden ratio, remember, this is, there's two messages.
	One is the orbital axis message and one is the message it sent me.
	So when I take 969.6 times the golden ratio going out, I get to 99.942% of the orbit of Saturn.
	And so that's telling me something.
	It's telling me that it's telling me that number is more in harmony with Saturn than any other planet.
	And guess what?
	When it crosses Saturn's orbit, July 19th to the 22nd, that's Sirius helical rising at the Giza Plateau.
	And it is ancient Egyptian New Year's Day and Mary Magdalene's feast day all within three days of this crossing.
	That's huge.
	That's ancient Egypt right there.
	This is a mathematical message, which is incredibly remarkable.
	Now, if I take, let me do this on the screen because this is the number it sent me.
	And then I'm going to go to how Aviloeb changed the date of arrival for Earth and how it seems to flatline because I'm not going to evade your question.
	That's really brand new data.
	But let me just finish this one thing.
	So remember, it sent me this.
	It sent me 2509.
	Let me just show this on the screen and I'm going to pull up my calculator.
	You're going to see, because remember, I sent this message from Earth.
	we know it uses the golden ratio and the golden ratio squared we know that so it sent us 250983 so i'm going to put that on my calculator and then i'm going to show you my calculator 2509.83 And then we're going to stop, share there, and then share my calculator.
	I'm going to show you what this number does.
	This is what it sent me on my Jimmy Blanchette technique radio.
	So I'm just going to divide this by the golden ratio.
	Repeating.
	Now watch.
	I'm going to come right to like Earth.
	See, I got to nine.
	Look at it.
	I'm only one number away from my 591.
	I'm just dividing it by the golden ratio.
	This number here is 366.17.
	The orbit of Earth is three is the orbit of Earth is 365.256 days to go around the Sun.
	So I'm just going to divide it and show you my percentage of accuracy.
	It's 99.747% of Earth.
	That's the number it sent me repeating divided by the golden ratio.
	Again, it's telling you that it's on the way to Earth, correct?
	Yes.
	So now we go to our next slide, which is what's really weird is what Abby Loeb said recently, which it's basically going to stall or hang out for how many days is it?
	I'll show you.
	This is he, I went to Carrie, I went to his original paper because I it looked like he deleted his original paper with all of its closest approximations to the planets.
	And I found this.
	You see this blue line down here, how it pretty much flatlines from about, it looks like the second or third of December here and all the way to the 25th of December.
	And then suddenly, December 26th, the day after Christmas, it leaves.
	You see this sharp curve here?
	Yeah.
	Going away.
	So that means that originally Loeb said that you know how it's insane.
	I mean, it's like it doesn't make any sense.
	It doesn't, you know, I understand that they're that it's accurate, but I don't understand what is it trying to accomplish?
	What in the world?
	Okay, alien holidays.
	Hello.
	Hello, we're okay.
	And we'll, you know, Avi Loeb is predicting this, isn't he?
	This is part of the tradition.
	Oh, yeah, no, this isn't just him.
	He can't write a paper alone.
	All of his papers are co-authored.
	Sure.
	So the math gets cross-checked, right?
	You know, I cross-checked my math three times and because I have done cross-checking and got different answers and then said, how the heck did I get that answer?
	But so you can cross-check yourself.
	But then I had ChatGPT cross-check my golden ratio squared on the three visitors and it said I was right.
	So, I mean, I don't need it to tell me I was right, but it's nice to have that, right?
	So why did he originally say the 20th of December?
	The press said the 17th because they weren't trying to keep everybody away from this being a Christmas comet or December 25th.
	If you know the real, yeah, you know the real story is Sol Invictus, the date of the Roman sun god is actually the yeah, it's not actually Jesus's, you know, yeah, it's not.
	So that I agree with that.
	So so that means that his data changes.
	He no longer has the old data.
	I haven't checked his new data.
	I want you to think about this with me, okay?
	Okay.
	So why did he either think he made a mistake and correct it, or was he right all along, but he had, there's some manipulation on purpose.
	Now, those are great questions because if the press is manipulating the data, they don't even know how to read his paper.
	Right.
	And his paper said, one, they could be negative VTs and two, they could be positive, for lack of a simpler term terminology.
	Right.
	He believes they're going to drop off because of the close timing to Mars, Earth, and Venus.
	and Jupiter, which are phenomenally close timings, that they were clearly going to be dropping off probes or subcraft or smaller.
	I don't see where he gets, I don't see where that's logical.
	Well, it's based on the data.
	You don't mind my saying so.
	Why?
	Because he's going to be close to those planets.
	Therefore, it's going to drop off probes.
	I don't think if this happens, then this happens.
	I don't think that's a logic, a step of logic that actually goes from one to the other.
	I think that's a leap.
	Okay, well, let me show you.
	This might help answer.
	I'm going to go through one planet at a time.
	We didn't do this last time because I haven't shown these slides yet.
	On the way in.
	It's like saying, because I'm going to go to New York, then I'm going to go to London and then I'm going to go to Paris.
	I'm going to drop.
	Like, why the hell does that follow?
	Yeah.
	So exactly.
	So, but watch this.
	This is a scientist, for God's sake.
	Right.
	So let's backtrack because this is when it was on its way in.
	This was in 2023.
	It crosses the orbit of Neptune on the 13th of June.
	And you have about a three-day window there, which lines up to the ascension day of Christ, which is when on the calendar, 11 of Jesus's apostles saw him go flying up into the sky to be, you know, met with other gods.
	So this is, I'm just going to show you.
	Each on the way in.
	So this is going back in time because this is 2023.
	So we'll end that slide.
	Now I'll go to the next one.
	I'm going to go through every planet and you're going to see a major correspondence in the timing of this thing on the different calendars.
	So now we go to our next planet, which is Oranos.
	The way the Greeks pronounce it is Oranos.
	It will cross Oranos on May 6th, which is Buddha's birthday, which is on a lunar calendar and Jesus's ascension date.
	They cross and they pair up every so many years.
	They're rating the same.
	I thought they would be out of our solar system by then.
	Oh, no, no, no.
	This is when it was coming in.
	So we're not going out yet.
	I'm going, I'm back in time.
	This is last May.
	You have a year here, though, that says May 6th, 2032.
	You're extrapolating to the future.
	No, because I know the lunar calendar really well.
	So the lunar calendar, which these dates are on, is a window that oscillates back and forth like a sine wave.
	So when you're in that window, you're in that window.
	And that when there are several days on either side of these huge planet crossings that will correspond because this thing is moving so fast, if you're in a window like that, some years the dates between these events are so close and some years they go really far away.
	So just watch these correspondences.
	I know the lunar calendar, I've done huge studies.
	We should never really be on the lunar calendar, but we are because in the ancient world, they didn't know how to measure time like the Egyptians did with an actual star, which was serious.
	So this is last 13th of June, 14th of June, 10th of June.
	You have a huge window, actually.
	It crosses the orbit of Jupiter.
	This looks like Jupiter, yeah, on the 13th of June, which again is Buddha's birthday.
	Buddha's Day of Enlightenment is June 13th in 2014.
	And Buddha's Day of Enlightenment is on a, it's not exactly a lunar calendar.
	It's kind of like a solar lunar calendar combination.
	Again, You're in the ascension date of Jesus window again.
	So just watch what happens because we're not at the present date yet.
	We're back in time.
	So now we're going to go to Saturn.
	And again, this was on the way in.
	So this is still backwards in time.
	And then we're going to go forward in time.
	And you're going to see how perfectly timed these events are.
	So when it, when it was crossing Saturn's orbit, this is no, this is forward in time.
	No, I've got a I got the wrong slide here.
	No, I that's that that's I haven't come into Earth yet.
	So we've got to go to I did Neptune, Uranus, Jupiter.
	I've got to do well, I have a slide here that had I put in the front of the thing that which it's August 25th, 2025.
	Is that no?
	That's going to be, I'll tell you what that is in a minute.
	So the closest position on Loeb's original data to Mars, which is the closest it will come to a physical planet is Yom Kippur.
	Because Yom Kippur is actually this year on this year's lunar calendar is going to be the first to the second of October, but it's going to be closest to Mars on the second, third of October,
	which is the day that the God of Moses was landed on Mount Sinai, obviously from another planet, and delivered the Ten Commandments, which marks the day of atonement for the Jewish people in Solomon's Temple, Holy of Holies, which was a cube, a cubic temple where the Shekinah, this ball of white, actually lived and where the high priest went in one day per year.
	So this particular year, when it arrives at Mars, will be Yom Kippur within a matter of less than 24 hours on the crossing.
	That is okay.
	But again, if Yom Kippur, all you're saying is when Moses got the tablets, is that what you're trying to say?
	Because, you know, I have a different interpretation of that data because I would say he got a bunch of orders from the people or the beings that think they run us.
	And they basically said, do this, don't do this, don't do that, blah, blah, blah.
	Right?
	Right.
	And so those that's actually what they are.
	They're orders.
	They're orders.
	It happened to commandments, commands.
	Okay.
	They're commands.
	Okay, you will do this, you will do that, you will do this.
	So you're saying it's going to be closest to Mars on that day?
	Yeah, which is the planet of war, right?
	Which is, which is also where, um, you know, um, not Anu, but um, Marduk is that's what that was Marduk's home.
	So, so maybe on this craft is Marduk.
	Well, remember, we showed we showed that last time, how close this thing is to when Marduk came in.
	When Marduk came in last time on the ancient Sumerian record, it was just outside the orbit of Mars.
	But now it's going to be closest to Mars on the outside of the orbit of Mars.
	Let's let's go back to that slide again because well, see, that's again, it's like it's almost a signal, you know, of a return, right?
	It is.
	Nobody wants to say that, really.
	Look at this: this is the God of Moses' day, the most holy day of the year.
	Nobody's talking about this.
	This is Yom Kippur.
	And Avilo is Jewish.
	I don't know if he's religious, but look at this.
	Now, we all know that when Moses' God came on Mount Sinai, I actually took measurements from the Great Pyramid to the real Mount Sinai in Jordan and calculated the harmony of the order.
	It's the same thing.
	I measure in feet from the Great Pyramid to the true Mount Sinai, keep dividing it by the golden ratio.
	I got Mars at almost 100% accuracy.
	So, what is it about Mars and the God of Moses?
	Marduk, we know that because he is a psycho.
	I mean, that's my understanding of the guy.
	He's the son of, I mean, you know, some of this mythology varies, different interpretations, but at least according to what I've read and heard, Marduk is the son of Enki, rebelled against his elders, and basically is like a very warlike, dictatorial personality.
	Dictator.
	Yeah.
	So this is from Sitchin's book.
	And you can see when Marduk, which is one of the same as Nibiru, here's the original planet, path of Marduk and the new path of Marduk, he's saying, which goes and crashes into Tiamat, creating the asteroid belt.
	And then Lakmu here is presumably Mars.
	So it crosses in the outer bands of Mars.
	So why so close to Mars?
	What is it about Mars with Marduk?
	Obviously, that's the home planet.
	And even back in the day, okay.
	And then he came over to Earth, but he stayed on Mars most of the time, actually, at least as far as Marduk's concern.
	Right.
	Now, let's look even closer.
	Let's go back to that because now that I just showed an ancient slide, you come to this again.
	Is does Loab, when he's saying this, there could be a war or this thing could be weaponized?
	I mean, we know what happened after the Ten Commandments were delivered on Earth.
	There was a great war, and Moses led troops into battle.
	So this is very symbolic.
	Not a really good sign, I have to say.
	That's so interesting, though.
	It's great that you're doing that.
	Okay, so.
	So this is the closest physical.
	Also, keep in mind the communication between the planet that it's near and the craft, right?
	Right.
	It's facilitated by its proximity.
	Right.
	So if it also orders to give Mars, for example, let's just say roughly, or the people of Mars or the bases we have on Mars, by the way, if it had something to deliver, that there would be a purpose in getting close to the planet.
	Exactly, I think where Loeb's hypothesis comes from.
	So now look at where it's really headed.
	And then we're going to go all the way out.
	It's my turquoise ring here is the ring of 591, which is the hyperdimensional planet in Crystal Sarita's model, is exactly where the bullseye hits, right?
	And so this is very clear that first it will come proximate to Mars on the outer orbit of Mars.
	And what's the date?
	What's the date?
	Well, the date I have now for when it will hit 591, again, it hits each orbit twice on the way in and on the way out.
	Loeb missed that.
	It will come in close proximity to Earth twice.
	And maybe that's why he's got the flat line, because it will do it twice.
	It's actually twice.
	It will come if you triangulate it because it doesn't cross Earth's orbit.
	It doesn't cross Venus's orbit, but it comes into its closest approximation to them, but it's actually headed for inside the orbit of Mars, which is where 591 is exactly where it is.
	But this is an extrapolation of a trajectory that could actually change.
	The other thing is, what about the notion that it could jump?
	So that instead of, in other words, you know how he has a straight line for when it hits Mars and then it comes back through across that meridian or whatever you want to call it.
	In other words, it's actually, it could jump from one point to the other point very quickly, you know.
	It could.
	Let me bring instead of thinking it's going to take time to do all this.
	I mean, we're presuming it's not going to change its velocity and trajectory.
	I think that's a huge presumption when you don't even, you know, know the beings on the craft.
	Right.
	So right now it's, you know, it's on the 21st of August, it will be coming into the orbital range of Ceres, which is a dwarf planet, which ends up incredibly harmonic, very important to me.
	And then it will be coming here.
	It will be, it will be meeting up in its close proximity to Mars on Yom Kippur.
	And then it's actually headed for my position 591, which it will hit twice also.
	It will hit that position twice.
	So I have very precise math on that.
	But let's keep going now because we're going to go, we're going to follow it all the way out because Loeb is saying it's going to run.
	We're going to send the Juno spacecraft to rendezvous with it on the way out to Jupiter.
	So let's look at its Earth crossing.
	Again, its Earth crossing was originally here.
	But can I just ask you a question here?
	Because is that logical that we would check in with it by way of our spacecraft?
	I understand they have to connect in this proximity, but the thing is, it's on the way out.
	It's already come directly near Earth.
	If it was threatening, you wouldn't wait until it was leaving to connect with it.
	Oh, I know.
	I know.
	So what is the logic here?
	I just, you know, I just want to know.
	Yeah, no, I think whatever I go on Loeb's site every time he posts another article, he's adamant consistent that this is not a comet.
	It's an aliens spacecraft or probe.
	And if it's a probe, then it has a trajectory, a velocity.
	It's going to be like an observer collecting data in the solar system, and it's going to leave.
	But that was the hypothesis for Amuamua, right?
	Like that it was a probe that might have been collecting data.
	So why send three?
	Because 21 horsepower.
	Can I ask you, is Amuamua, did it have the same signatures of the Anunnaki that this one does or not?
	Well, you see, you can't calculate a ratio with one and you can't calculate a ratio with two.
	You need three.
	So when the third one comes.
	You know, that third one, there was a third one.
	This is the third one, I think.
	Right.
	There's 21.
	So were there other ones Anunnaki signatures as well hitting those same points?
	No?
	Yes.
	Well, remember, you pointed out the new discovery of the Neptunian transit planet, which is which is notable.
	Right.
	Yep.
	And that's a whole other study I've done.
	That's new.
	That is a very fascinating thing.
	It is.
	I don't know how that works in here, though.
	Well, they're timed.
	They're all timed.
	And so, but again, as a public person accessing online data compared to what the data that they have, remember, we haven't seen a picture of this thing for three weeks.
	And, you know, when I get through these slides, we'll look at the pictures and how I was able to handle them in a Nikon photo program that can tell me what they really look like.
	So this was his earliest data.
	The closest distance from Earth was going to be the 20th of December with winter solstice being on the 21st.
	Notice how we're one day off.
	Yom Kippur, one day off.
	We're one day off winter solstice.
	I know how calendars work.
	Our calendar slips because we only absorb 0.25 every four years because it's 365.256 and the decimals keep going.
	About every 137 years, we're off another day, off another day, off another day.
	So we slip.
	And that's why the previous, we're on Gregorian now calendar, and we used to be on the on the, I don't know the name of Slapimi, the earlier calendar, what's it called?
	Julian.
	We were on the Julian calendar.
	And the reason the calendars have to be adjusted is we only use leap year At 0.25, which is a quarter, and that's not enough.
	So, the fact that these dates are off by one date to winter solstice and one date to Yom Kippur is very interesting to me.
	But then again, what about the idea that, you know, we at different parts of Earth, it's different times.
	So, it might not be in England.
	It's practically a day, or at least Egypt, it's a day ahead, right?
	Yeah, there.
	The East is ahead of us.
	So, so there's a time of the day where exactly where the crossover, because again, where was Yom Kippur originally stated in the East, who was ahead of us.
	So, so that point is very important.
	So, let's keep going on the way out, and you'll see all these interesting crossing dates.
	And then we can go to the imagery.
	And this is when this date is really interesting.
	Again, these are interesting dates because there's a difference between when 3E Atlas is at its closest position to Jupiter.
	And Jupiter is the most remarkable because its orbit is just under 12 years.
	So, in percentages, the odds of 3i Atlas coming in and getting this close to Jupiter in this huge orbit is utterly millions against it in odds of randomness.
	This is one of the reasons Loeb believes this is extraterrestrial.
	So, this point at Jupiter will be March 16th, according to Loeb.
	But that's not when it crosses Jupiter's orbit.
	That's when it's closest to Jupiter, which happens to be Islam's night of power date for 2026.
	In fact, it will be March 16th in 2026.
	So, we're on their calendar here, marking when the Archangel Gabriel delivered the first pages of the Quran to Muhammad.
	That's very interesting because this date is when Loeb asked Congress, Congresswoman Luna, wrote him a letter urging NASA to use the remaining fuel of the Juno spacecraft now ending its mission at Jupiter this September.
	Have they agreed?
	Have they agreed?
	I haven't heard of the agreement, but the timing of the Juno spacecraft being there and finishing its mission in September and having a little bit of fuel left, he's saying turn it off, save the fuel, whatever the fuel is, because you can use solar panels, I guess.
	I don't know what's powering Juno.
	I have to research that.
	He wants it to go rendezvous and get close, close photography.
	Have they agreed?
	Has any motion been?
	No, I don't.
	I don't.
	Again, the public is on TikTok and they're doing all sorts of things.
	Your people are watching important stuff.
	The focus here is so powerful because of what this date is that we, do you really think they would ever share pictures us that close to it when we haven't seen a picture for three weeks and it's it's super close to earth right now.
	It's very close.
	It's getting incredibly close right now.
	Wow.
	So now what about, okay, what what is the symbolic value of being that close to Jupiter?
	Why did this craft have to make that crossing, so to speak?
	Well, I could go on and on about Jupiter.
	Let's go back to that image again because Jupiter is like the location of Christ's birth is in the harmony of order of Jupiter in my calculations, which is a lot of math to look at.
	Jupiter, the god of the Romans and the Greek, the Greeks, it was Zeus, who is one and the same as Jupiter to the Romans, the chief god.
	The theories around Jupiter even being Nibiru, because there are some scholars who argue in the Babylonian tablets that Nibiru actually means planet of the crossing, which is apparently Jupiter.
	I probably disagree with that, but I mean, there's when you understand, this is where Loeb's whole hypothesis comes in.
	Yes, it comes incredibly close to Mars, fairly close to Earth and Venus, but percentage-wise, it's closer to Jupiter than Mars in percentage of because Mars orbit is 686 days.
	Jupiter's orbit is 4,332.58 days.
	So to be this close to Jupiter, instead of Jupiter being here or here or here or down here or over here, is a remark.
	It's remarkable.
	I have, I have to say that, you know, if I was a scientist and trying to analyze this, I would definitely be looking at why does it want to come clip so close to Jupiter?
	Yeah.
	And because it had to, in a sense, go out of its way to do so, right?
	Oh, yeah, it had to be perfectly timed.
	Right.
	And again, this is the night of power in the salon for so there's an intention indicated there, which Loeb obviously is picking up on.
	But what is the reason?
	Like, why?
	What's the reason?
	What is this?
	Well, I want to, I'd want to know which of Jupiter's moons, because the diameter, like, you know, how many moons Jupiter has?
	So let's look, just hang it.
	It's a huge number.
	I don't know.
	It's a staggering number, actually.
	So, the number, how many moons does Jupiter have?
	It's a big number.
	It has 95 officially recognized moons, and some of those are really big.
	And the diameter, I mean, you can take a good pair of binoculars, which I have.
	In fact, right now, if you look east in the morning, I've been doing this every morning for weeks.
	First, watching Venus rise, and then Jupiter's way over here.
	The last three nights, Jupiter and Venus are paired.
	In fact, this morning it was right here.
	I'm talking about the morning.
	So before sunrise, get up at 4:30 in the morning and look east.
	So tomorrow morning, Jupiter's going to be up here, right?
	And so Jupiter has, if you look through binoculars, you can see a lot of moons, but it's got 95 moons.
	And so the diameter of the orbit of those moons interests me because if you get really precise, it might be heading, it's heading for close proximity to one of the moons more than it is the actual planet itself.
	Definitely.
	Definitely is.
	And so that would tell me they already know this, which moon of Jupiter, again, looking at the image before we got two more planet crossings to look at on the way out, which of its moons is it closest to?
	And I've got, I don't know what kind of data you have on the gods and goddesses in Jupiter, but they're the chief Egyptian god of Jupiter is Egyptian god of, I was looking at this recently, I had it booked, is Amun.
	The Egyptian god most closely associated with the Roman god Jupiter is Amun, particularly his syncretic form as Jupiter Amun.
	So here he is with his staff.
	And again, the attributing a goddess.
	You mean Amun Ra?
	Is it Amun Ra?
	Is it?
	I think Amun is looking it up.
	Okay, so Jupiter in Egyptian, right?
	Mythology, I guess you'd call it.
	Yeah, he's associated with Jupiter.
	Amun.
	Yeah, I see.
	Associated with the god Amun, who represents wisdom, abundance, and growth, leadership, generosity, expansive energy.
	And he's painted with the blue skin, kind of like, you know, the god, you know, Krishna also being painted, shown with the blue skin.
	And there's a whole study on blue-skinned people just, you know, on in the United States somewhere.
	So that's interesting.
	Now let's keep going because now we're going to follow it going out.
	And when it crosses Saturn, Saturn is the date of Egypt in the crossing.
	It's amazing how it's doing this.
	So this is on the way out.
	So this will be the 19th of July, 2026.
	So that's next July 19th.
	It will be coming.
	It will be crossing the orbit of Saturn.
	And of course, Sirius Helical Rising is the 19th to the 22nd of July, Mary Magdalene's feast day, the 22nd of July.
	And the Apollo missions were dated the 19th to 20th of July.
	There's something else that happened in that date in that window, too, which is, I believe, the Washington, D.C. UFO FWAP had a, there were two FWAPs, and one of them is dated in this same period.
	So I think there's a message here about the gods of the many religions and the dates in the harmony of the order to the rotation of the planet.
	So RKO astronomy is really at play here with 3i Atlas's message, whatever it's this is its message.
	To me, this is its message.
	Again, all the, if it changes trajectory, if it disappears, all of those dates mean something because that was the original calculation.
	But if it changes trajectory, then I don't know what it means.
	Okay, well, this is kind of interesting.
	So during the Pharaohs back in Egypt, sought to legitimize their rule by aligning themselves with Amun, which is Jupiter.
	Okay, so in other words, again, I keep seeing these power moves.
	Okay.
	At least from my perspective, this trajectory is all about, you know, re, in a certain sense, re-establishing its power over us and in our solar system.
	That's the significance of being close to Jupiter and going out of your way.
	There's no way they would, if that was their objective, there was no way they would ignore Jupiter or take a different trajectory, right?
	Oh, yeah.
	No, I would say it's Mars of the physical planets.
	It's it's tuned to Mars and Jupiter the most.
	Yeah.
	I mean, the highest percentages.
	But I'm measuring the crossing of the ring of the orbit as well as the close approximation.
	So it's going to cross Oranos on May 24th, 2027, which is Buddha's birthday the year before on, and which is also the Ascension Day window of Jesus, May 26th, 2022.
	Again, a lunar calendar, the dates go like this, but you're in when you're inside the window, you're inside the window, and the window swings left, center, and right of an orbit of a planet.
	I mean, there's a lot of arguments against the lunar calendar, but there's no question the day that Buddha was born was on a specific date in what would be a star calendar.
	But because we fought those cultures followed the moon, they were really each year they're going in and out of phase of the true date that it actually occurred, but yet they still honor that very ancient system.
	So these some of these may be corrections.
	So here's the last planet crossing, which is Neptune.
	And on the way out, of course, this is when it crosses Neptune, it's the year is going to be 2028.
	This is going to be in our solar system for a few years, right?
	Because we're going to be coming into 2026 and it's going to finish the solar system.
	Well, you could call this the inner solar system because you can go all the way to Nibiru.
	And I've done that.
	The 12th of April, again, is Orthodox Easter, Easter Sunday in the Gregorian calendar in 2020.
	And so again, this is an Easter date, Easter window date when it crosses Neptune on the way out.
	So those crossings of every planet are remarkable to most of the world religions.
	Also, the oldest date I got for Krishna was also the 19th of July.
	Let me pull that up.
	That's interesting because that's Saturn.
	It will cross Saturn on that window.
	I have it here.
	I just want to show this because this is from a really ancient source of mathematics.
	That's here it is.
	Time of Lord Krishna's birth, the 19th of July, 3228 BCE.
	So 20th of July, if we consider birth after midnight.
	Again, that's really old data, right?
	But that shows an alignment to the Egyptian helical rising of Sirius also for Krishna.
	I mean, that's something that really needs to be looked at.
	So ancient cultures and archaeoastronomy built temples in alignment to stars and/or planets and their very precise timing of dates.
	Three eye Atlas is demonstrating that to an incredibly high degree of accuracy.
	And I think that's that's showing proof of intelligence right there.
	So well, it's kind of interesting because it says here they're they're trying to associate Amun and Jupiter as being conveying the divine being holding a prominent position as the king of the gods, ruling over both celestial and earthly realms.
	I mean, so again, you know, this is like trying to say, okay, so I'm a king, I'm divine, you know, I mean, these are all like very, you know, demonstrative actions, basically sending a message.
	If you're going to say they send a message that here I am, right, when you contacted them, then this is this is that in spades, okay?
	This is actually a very significant, this is like back in ancient Egypt, this would be the Pharaoh going, you know, around Egypt or something in a certain order, his realm, his, his, you know, that he commands, right?
	Oh, yeah.
	And when you see what it really looks like, it looks like the eye of Horus is what it in the nucleus is what it looks like.
	And so it almost looks like from this eye, it's holographically projecting geometrical structures around itself, but the eye itself is at least seven miles in diameter.
	And then in the black and white photography, which is much more sensitive to contrast bands than color is, we can see geometrical structures.
	But that has to do with the shape of the craft.
	Well, I'll show you.
	So my next part of this presentation, we're going to go through the imagery.
	And it's based on this.
	This, I mean, look, I was a professional photographer.
	I think, can you say you did professional photography at one point?
	Sort of.
	Yeah, I was trained.
	Yeah, I was a darkroom expert, black and white expert.
	I mean, I did a lot of printing in Los Angeles and I won a lot of awards when I was much younger.
	Nobody does that kind of photography anymore.
	But this image here was the first good color image of it.
	And the first thing I noticed about it, this is from a telescope in Hawaii.
	This is published everywhere.
	The first thing I noticed about this is extremely low contrast on purpose.
	I mean, they're not just see it.
	I can see polygonal geometry right here in these outer bands right here.
	You see the edges of the blue here?
	You see these sharp angles?
	Okay.
	It's a joke that they do this.
	So all I had to do with this image is bring it in to a good Nikon editor and start working with it.
	And I'll show you the progression of what starts to happen.
	I mean, it's kind of interesting to watch it because I'm doing it really gently.
	I'm not in a hurry to make it crazy.
	But when you see what I see in the end, you're going to see what Loeb sees.
	Already in the blue, there are these holes and patches, which show some type of geometric framework.
	And in fact, in many of the physics papers I've read published on Loeb's site, they use the word geometry, that it has geometry.
	In fact, in the red bands here, again, where I see these holes, it's almost like honeycomb.
	You're going to see that structuring a lot better as I show you the progression of this image.
	And slowly, we're going to see.
	So why is it so round?
	It's kind of oval, but I would say I actually calculated the ratio of the cross-section this way to this way.
	And it is mostly round, but it is slightly oval, as is the orbit of Earth, right?
	The orbit of Earth is barely elliptical.
	It's barely elliptical.
	And again, you're starting to see shape here.
	You're starting to see honeycomb.
	And why are the colors different?
	What does that signify?
	Do you know?
	Well, what's interesting about the colors, and that's a good question, is all chemistry emits spectral lines, which means all chemistry emits different bands of color when it's refracting light, right?
	So all chemistry is refractive and has its own color bands.
	And what Loeb says in his papers is there is no spectral lines in three eye atlas.
	So when asked about what's causing the color, he couldn't answer.
	You see, now we're starting to well, watch.
	It's going to get radical here in a minute.
	It's going to get really radical what this thing does.
	I just want people to see I didn't just jump to the final conclusion in one giant leap.
	So you're going to see a real eye very soon here.
	And I'm not going to comment on that level.
	Now we're going to get to the real meat of this thing.
	Now we're starting to see all I'm doing, all data in a photograph, digital or not, is data.
	You can't put data in a photograph by adjusting the bands.
	You see in the red here these holes?
	Yeah.
	It's like honeycomb kind of structuring.
	And we're starting to see wave patterns in the blue.
	It kind of looks like an egg yolk.
	We would think perhaps red is hot and blue is cold.
	Is that maybe wrong?
	No, blue light is higher in temperature.
	So the higher the frequency of the color, the higher the temperature.
	So red is colder than blue.
	Red is colder.
	It's wavelengths are longer.
	So red light has blue has a shorter wavelength.
	Well, it has a certain, you know, it's move, it's propulsion.
	It's its method of propulsion.
	Doesn't the colors signify the propulsion or the type of propulsion?
	Is that not?
	Well, Loeb has written a paper on that.
	On, okay, now it's shocking.
	Now, this is the eye.
	And in fact, you can see.
	I don't understand how you got that.
	That's the same image.
	I'm just increasing my color bands and contrast and filters.
	So all this shimmering gray stuff is refraction in the envelope of the space around it.
	This black envelope here, notice has it has the inner part of the eye right here.
	You see this part of the eye right here.
	And the two black sectors are low refractivity, very low refractivity.
	And so this, you see these waves in the red?
	This is real wave structure here in the red, really incredible wave structure.
	What does that mean?
	That means geometry.
	This thing is so sophisticated because when we examine the black and white images next, you're going to see real polygonal, hexagonal, pentagonal geometry, real structure.
	This thing, remember, this is the nucleus, which is a minimum of seven miles across.
	A person standing six feet tall on the Great Plains can only see three miles in either direction.
	So six miles across.
	That's enormous.
	So this is seven miles minimum.
	Lowab is saying 12 in the nucleus.
	This black space can't be happening unless there's nothing in here because light refracts off of crystals and dust and everything, which is what gives us a picture.
	In fact, if you don't have refraction in the refractive index, which is how the speed of light changes depending on what it's going through, you don't have an image.
	And, and, and, and you don't have anything for that.
	How did they come up with that black nothingness around?
	Well, this is in the photograph.
	I'm the first person to find this.
	Okay.
	Is this stealth technology?
	I'll show you what I think it is.
	This is going to be really, really, I really, where is my eye?
	Because it could be.
	And if it was, what would that mean?
	That it's far bigger than it really appears.
	Oh, no.
	The geometry surrounding this nucleus are huge.
	Potentially, even like what is prophesied at the end of the Bible, the cubic city of God being, being just that, like, okay, well, I'm going to have to go to my Facebook.
	I keep having to do this to pull this image up because every time I find, I can't tell what I name it.
	I thought I called it the eye of Atlas, but it's on my Facebook.
	Here we go.
	So let's go to this.
	Okay.
	Share screen.
	Okay.
	So, you'll notice the eye of Horus in the lower left.
	The Cyclops with the third eye in the forehead is, see, the Greek, the word for heaven in the Christian Bible, the New Testament, which was written in Greek because the English language wouldn't exist for 500 years, plus the French language.
	The word for heaven is Oranos, which is the Greek god of the heavens who creates the Titans and creates the Cyclops, who then create the Olympians, and cohabiting with the goddess of earth.
	This is Greek mythology, which is what the Bible was written in.
	People don't realize the Christian Bible was written by Greek writers, and there was no English or French language.
	There was Latin, and there was Aramaic, which is what Jesus spoke, and there was Greek.
	And so it was all written in Greek.
	The word for heaven appears 280 times, which is the Great Pyramid of Egypt is 280 royal cubits tall.
	And that's how many times the word heaven, which is actually Oranos, there is no such thing as heaven.
	That's an English invention, who is the chief god of creation, and who is symbolized by the eye.
	So could this, I mean, this is what it looks like in the photograph.
	Not making, you can't, you can't, you can't change a photograph unless you bring it into some AI program.
	I didn't do that.
	All I'm doing is adding contrast, cleaning out my blacks,
	and my gray scale i'm using a really good nikon program you can see this very an old painting of jesus with the eye in the pyramid above him the eye above the pyramid and the us dollar the cyclops and the eye of horus and or i still am very is this what they saw carry thousands of years ago did an eye go through the solar system the all-seeing eye well but you know,
	that's surveillance.
	I mean, let's get down to it.
	Yeah.
	I also want to say that this black area is very fascinating, I think, that outlines this.
	Let's go back to that.
	Let's go back to that.
	So, since you're saying it's very odd that it has no reflection in there, right?
	Yeah.
	It's going through space.
	It has an envelope, so to speak, around it.
	Right.
	That black area.
	Is that, you know, zero gravity?
	Is that, you know, what are we talking about here?
	What is that?
	Is it not stealth technology?
	The first image they gave us was so fuzzy and low in contrast that you couldn't see this.
	It's the same image.
	And so the black areas, which there are two membranes, I mean, isn't it very possible that it is either stealth technology or some kind of protective shell that is encompassing the whole craft in case one of our secret space program people or group wants to shoot it down?
	It probably kind of membrane, Carrie.
	This is a big membrane.
	I mean, you're looking at it.
	No, that's what I'm saying.
	It's like massive.
	It's massive.
	And it's maybe we're not so interested in having our ruler, so so-called ruler come back.
	And maybe that's he's, he knows it.
	I know.
	Look at, look at this little corner in here.
	That's the, that's the inner part of the eye where I'm pointing in my eye right now.
	This is, this is, this is, look at all these waves in here.
	Now I've got even more images because I kept going.
	Um, and look at this one.
	Okay, this is all the same image.
	And then I'm going to go back in the end to the first image, and then we're going to look at the black and white.
	So look at this.
	This one, it's all about which color bands you accentuate, right?
	So I noticed in Loeb's paper, I'm going to show you his paper, and he shows the same shape, but he doesn't have the detail that I have.
	Using a different telescope, they have the same shape as this.
	But look at these holes like honeycomb.
	And remember, this is only a tiny amount of the white in color from the 21st of July from this telescope in Hawaii.
	They took this image and put it all over the internet.
	And it's this, I went to the site and I got the high-res version.
	I didn't use the press version.
	I downloaded the high-res version.
	So all of this data is part of the image.
	And when we go back to the now, this one really interests me because I really got into the blue here.
	Watch this one.
	Look at the structure in the blue here.
	I've got 90-degree angles here.
	Look at these angles.
	Look at that.
	That's structure.
	Now, again, we're not seeing clear structure.
	This image is extremely far away from Earth, but that is real structure.
	And this yellow band here is starting to take shape in the nucleus.
	Now, let's go back to where we started with the first image because there is structure there that I can't seem to pull out of it.
	It's very soft, very low contrast on purpose.
	But I might be able to play around with this some more.
	When you accentuate certain color bands, you start to see, you see in the blue here, these polygonal sharp angles, which I'm highlighting here with my cursor.
	And if you come way out here, you see how straight edge this line is here and how long that is.
	And then here, another straight edge line here, another straight edge line.
	This is one, two, three sides.
	So I would say this is hexagonal if I was to complete up here.
	But I see more of these holes right here, right here, right here.
	You see these holes.
	And way out here is refraction.
	Well, can I ask you one thing?
	You know, those structures that you're seeing in the blue and in the red.
	Are those static structures or is that some kind of cloud formation?
	No, a cloud would be smooth and streaming.
	There's no tail on this thing.
	It has no cometary tail.
	I understand that.
	But what I'm saying is like, or is it, you know, steam or, you know, the rings of Saturn?
	Is it some kind of formation that is like, you know, going like this?
	It's like in some way.
	Well, there is the hexagonal structure on the pole of.
	I mean, I'm thinking that it's a solid craft, but it could be surrounded.
	That could be part of the technology that is part of the protect.
	That is.
	Well, what I'm getting is the projection is actually solid and there's an eye in the center that's projecting it.
	So this is Loeb's paper.
	I mean, these are where all his papers are.
	Look at this one.
	See, you see the shape in the data of the eye here.
	You see this?
	Yeah.
	This isn't really good data compared to what I pulled out of the Hawaiian telescope image.
	I did a better job than they did.
	I mean, using a really good Nikon editor.
	But you can see here telescope, Hubble Telescope shows a diffuse glow ahead of three eye atlas.
	There should be no diffuse glow in the front of it.
	Notice the date is July 21st.
	This is when they stop sending us images.
	It's August 15th, tomorrow.
	And three weeks later, we got nothing, right?
	And this is where this is where the rotational period, 16.6.
	All right, I wanted to ask you about that.
	So why would it rotate?
	On its axis, because that's the message.
	It's sending us a signal.
	You convert that to minutes, it produced the number of exact number of years.
	But is it trying, is it rotating because it's supposed to be like a planetoid or mini-planetoid?
	No, I think it's rotation is a massive remember, it's going to have gravity or something like that.
	I mean, you know, they're always shown.
	I heard it was a lie, but I heard that, you know, there are a lot of, you know, even Star Trek.
	I mean, the thing rotates, okay?
	So it's always rotating.
	So what's why?
	What's the purpose?
	What does the rotation do?
	What does it make possible?
	Well, I mean, we know one thing: artificial gravity can be created by rotation of a spacecraft.
	Like, right.
	That's what I'm asking.
	Yeah.
	You see, this is a Hubble image.
	You see this black and white image.
	Look at this.
	Wait a minute.
	Because if it's rotating to create what you call artificial gravity, if that's really a thing that they have to do with every spacecraft, my understanding, based on stuff we see on movies and TV, then there's beings that have weight inside the craft that don't want to float.
	They want to have a be grounded.
	That's what you need.
	Yeah, and the Anunnaki wouldn't.
	In other words, they have bodies.
	They're not just AI.
	You understand me?
	I love what you're saying here because I couldn't have thought of this without you, which is why two heads are better than one.
	And I would say that we need to calculate how many newtons of gravity would it produce at that rotation period.
	Well, you might even be able to tell how many people or beings are on the craft.
	Well, if it's seven miles minimum in diameter, you could have a city in there.
	You could have a freaking city.
	I understand, but you know, in other words, these are the things they have to consider, don't they?
	Yep.
	So this is a Hubble image from the 21st.
	Look at the geometry in here.
	It almost reminds me, if you go to Ezekiel's wheels in the book of Ezekiel, you see God sitting on a sapphire throne in the middle, and you have all these structures around him, wheels within wheels.
	Well, I see like a cage-like structure.
	So here's your eye where it's really bright.
	Look at all these cage frames.
	Look at these polygonal angles way out here.
	So if this is 12 miles, then this has got to be 24 miles.
	And from here to here has to be somewhere around 50 miles.
	This is huge.
	Okay, but could this brightest area be its form of propulsion or could it be like a navigational headlight?
	I mean, I'm just trying to get it.
	Well, no, we know it's an eye.
	It has all the geometric structure of the eye with the multicolors.
	Remember, this is black and white.
	Okay, but what is okay, but what are you using it for?
	You're calling it an eye from outside, but from inside, what are they using it for?
	Why is it so bright?
	Well, I think this eye, I mean, using my look, we look through eyes.
	Consciousness is projected through the eyes.
	The human soul can be seen through the eyes.
	Yeah, but one of the ways, one of the things is it's alive.
	It's noticeable, so no one gets in its way for one thing.
	And it's got those two membranes to protect it.
	It has these cages of multiplex geometries.
	I mean, with a trained eye, you can see all the geometry here.
	I mean, yeah, you could get lost in the fuzz, but man, there's structure in there.
	Those aren't pixels.
	You're not.
	It's interesting in this picture.
	See, what are these oblong objects?
	Oh, those are background stars or planets streaking by.
	Those are.
	Okay.
	And then you have the state.
	So you have the fixed stars.
	And, you know, this is the way, like the word for star in ancient Greek.
	And when you go through the Bible, you have the fixed and then you have the non-fixed stars, right?
	Okay, but what's interesting is the brightness.
	See how the brightness is the same on some of these stars?
	Well, yeah, this one on the right here, I'd like to know exactly where they're looking.
	No, those should all be cataloged and marked.
	They really should.
	Every one of these.
	Yeah, so the exposure on these, it says on the website, I think it's around 40 seconds.
	So the camera's locked in on the moving object.
	The background objects are streaking by over the period of the time of.
	So are they going faster than the craft or slower?
	No, no, they're not.
	It's the rotational period of the Earth.
	It's the Earth that's moving.
	The camera is locked on the Earth.
	And the telescope is.
	No, no, this is the Hubble.
	Sorry.
	No, this is the Hubble.
	It's floating in space.
	You're asking really good questions.
	The Hubble is not on the Earth, but it is locking on its target, which is three-eye atlas, because you can't take a 40, you know, 40-50 second exposure of an object that's moving unless you're locked on it or it's going to be just a big blur.
	And is the, you're saying the Hubble, is the Hubble moving?
	The Hubble is in orbit.
	Yeah.
	So it's also moving.
	Yeah.
	So it picks a target.
	So here's your eye.
	Here's your, it almost likes, it looks like a hyperdimensional geometry cage.
	And then it has this bigger angular polygonal means mini side, many angle side.
	Look at these angles here.
	Well, it would be interesting to see if it's deflecting or pushing anything out of the way.
	Is there any way to see?
	Well, you get it.
	This is where you get into Loeb's papers about its propulsion versus gravity and having its own own propulsion.
	This is where he's really good at what he does.
	I mean, he knows this is not a comet.
	He knows.
	Yeah, obviously.
	So now we're looking at the geometry.
	First, we looked at the color geometry, and now we're looking what's great about black and white is colors almost blind you from the real structure.
	I love, I mean, I was a master black and white photographer and printer and darkroom person.
	Yeah, that's what I did as well.
	Yeah, I've used dozens of different chemicals, different contrasts.
	I wouldn't say I was master, but I studied it in college.
	Yeah, so I mean, film had crystals on the emulsion, which receive light at all these angles, whereas digital photographs only receive light coming in at 90 degrees to the plane of the sensor.
	It definitely Is revealing in a whole different way, that's for sure.
	Yeah, look at this.
	I mean, I'm really shocked that they're not sharing images with us for three weeks and watching.
	I'm not shocked.
	No, you're not shocked.
	Cover-up.
	It's a cover-up, the biggest cover-up, and nobody's saying anything because we've lost over half the population to all sorts of social media nonsense.
	So it's really hard to get anybody to focus.
	But look at, okay, let's look at again the distance to Earth.
	We're already from what I see, it's going to be half the current distance from December 3rd to the 25th that it is now.
	So it's going to be twice as close.
	So here it is.
	Here's Earth.
	And if we go day by day, you can see Earth is rotating this way, right?
	This is what I mean by it will have two crossings to Earth.
	So if you go.
	But if we were shooting at it, that would be one reason to hide the photographs.
	Yeah.
	I mean, because it's very possible at this point, you know, like you have to understand.
	I mean, first of all, it looks like it's got tons of protection against anything, right?
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And it's, it's, it's, it's sort of plowing its way through space with this huge camouflage or cover-up or whatever you want to call it.
	Um, and touching all these power points that the mathematics indicate that whoever's driving the craft is making a point every time they go near one of these, you know, like when you say it, it's when they cross the orbit of a planet.
	Like in physics, in the quantum world, the wave, which is the orbit, and the planet, the particle, are inseparable.
	They're one in the same because their energy is inexorably linked together as one.
	That's why I consider the crossing line is a very important data point.
	Loeb doesn't look at crossing lines, he looks at close proximity.
	So that's Yom Kippur, Mars.
	And then his date for his date for I jumped years here.
	2020, June, July, August.
	Now, I have two dates, believe it or not, is one is November 11th.
	November 11th is going to be the number of days between November 11th and its closest position to Mars, October the 3rd, is 39 times 2.
	And 39 times 2 in degrees is twice the angle of resurrection in Egyptology.
	And I have a whole other presentation on that.
	But what interests me is the fact that December the 21st, really, is within one day of Loeb's original date for its closest position to Earth.
	Now his paper says, and again, it might still be correct because if you look at the other graphic, which I'll pull up again in a minute, it's curving slightly, but it suddenly will jettison away on the day after Christmas, the 26th, according to him.
	It suddenly leaves that flat line that it seems to hold for the whole holiday season, which okay.
	Well, but what, you know, see, why does it leave so quickly?
	There's some it looks like that on a graph, but it has to do with the curvature, the orbital plane.
	You see, it has to do with this thing is three-dimensional.
	It's really cool.
	You're not saying it's speeding up, or you are saying it's speeding up.
	Well, I can't verify that yet because I don't have access to the data that he has.
	I just work with the velocities and trajectory from the data we have.
	You're saying that if it comes that close and then leaves quickly, one might draw certain conclusions from that.
	Well, yeah, I mean, let me pull up that image again.
	I call it, I named the image three eye Atlas Holy Christmas because look at this.
	I mean, he hasn't published it, he changed his original paper.
	This was his original paper.
	So, Loeb's original paper, I'd have to pull that up.
	Let me see if I can find his original, original paper on the ETA for Earth.
	See, date of intercept for Earth, these are the dates.
	I don't know, I think that's so suspicious.
	This is the 21st.
	Why does he only change that part of his paper?
	He didn't, he didn't announce it.
	I was scouring looking for his original, original paper, and which I downloaded luckily.
	So, let me go because you and I showed his original paper the first time we covered this.
	Yes, we did, but that doesn't exist anymore.
	Like December 2nd or something.
	Yeah, so let me see if I kept it.
	Well, I'm sure we have it on a previous one.
	No, no, I should have it here on it.
	It should be on my desktop.
	Let me look on my desktop because I want to show how much he's changed this for your audience.
	God, that's three eye outless.
	Anyway, I'm looking for it right now, but he's changed it a lot.
	Is it because he's got more data, or are they intentionally trying to not have people focus on the religious implications and why is it here at this time?
	God, what did I do with it if I didn't actually download the actual original?
	I know that we talked about it, I know that well, we linked to it, but now when I link to that page, he's changed all his close proxies.
	So, it'll be on the video.
	I'm just saying for people that, yeah, it'll be on your for people who want to see it.
	Yeah, you just go back to it, and then you could take a screenshot.
	You could go back and do that later.
	Yeah, I'll do that because I need to get okay.
	We're gonna have to wrap this up because we're quite a while.
	So, what you know, how would you like to wrap it up?
	How would you like to, you know, and then we need to have you back?
	Yeah, I would like to wrap it up to say, I mean, I'm both scientific, I'm spiritual in that I have a daily meditation spiritual practice every day.
	I have my own experiences with contact that I've had all my life since I was a kid, actually, since seeing a flying saucer, and so do I, yeah, and you do too.
	Going back to around the same time period in California, I grew up in the Bay Area from 1964-65 for several years, and then our family moved to Podesto.
	And then I was introduced to meditation by my father.
	And the meditation makes you much more open to receiving.
	It's not just for the purpose of eradicating suffering and attaining bliss, which really does happen, happens to me every day.
	Your mind expands into the cosmos.
	You actually see literally see the heavens and spiritual beings, which I've encountered many, many times personally.
	So, what makes me so interested in this is how mathematics and archaeo ancient astronomy and astrology even ties into this three eye atlas, whatever it is.
	You know, we don't know exactly what it is, but we do know what it's doing and crossing all of the planets as demonstrated on precise religious holiday windows of time that are accurate to better than 97 percent.
	Um, I think is truly remarkable and tells us a lot about what it's what it is.
	Yes, what do you think?
	And everything that I've said, it's signaling and it's communicating, it's signaling, yeah, and that's very important.
	I think it couldn't be more important.
	Yeah, the fact that Amu Mua, 21 bars off, and three eye Atlas in their closest position to the sun at Perohan is one to the golden ratio squared, and that the age of Methuselah and his father Enoch, 365 years, and Methuselah 969 are one to the golden ratio squared.
	And the fact that that's part of its message, I think there may be, you know, religious implications here, but not necessarily what people believe, but what really is.
	I mean, belief structures are not necessarily okay.
	Let me say, so it might be a reference to the age of man.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	And like you pointed out, when Moses got the Ten Commandments, and if you go way back in time, the Hammurabi, which is in ancient Babylon, received tablets of the law, suggests that humans don't know right from wrong, that we're incredibly stupid.
	I mean, we should be able to decide from ethics.
	You know, it's just the same thing as what's going on now.
	It's control.
	It's control.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	It's a control system.
	Yeah.
	And, you know, back in the days in Egypt and all these various societies in Rome, what did they do?
	They parade around, right?
	Yeah.
	And they try to prove that they have divine, you know, they're here for divine reasons and therefore they have the right to rule over humanity.
	And this is being demonstrated by the trajectory, by all the points they're hitting, you know, and there's probably more things that we can, you know, pull out of all of this, right?
	So, I mean, it's going to be kind of interesting because are they going to let it do what it's trying to do?
	It's a valid question.
	Is it going to get all the way?
	Is it really going to do something?
	I would say the dates to watch are the planet crossing dates.
	And Ceres will be the first inner planet.
	No, it's not an inner planet because it's outside of the orbit of Mars.
	That will be the 21st of August to the 23rd, which is the crossing of the sign of Leo, actually, right?
	Because what is the end of Leo, the 23rd or the 22nd?
	I mean, I'm a Leo on the edge because I'm the 21st.
	Okay, but what about this?
	Is the 25th?
	Is this no longer accurate, or what are you trying to say?
	Well, there you go.
	Asteroid Ceres.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	So the 20, it's actually crossed the orbit of Ceres there.
	It's actually so, yeah, the 20, you could say the 21st to the 25th.
	So it's coming into Virgo, right?
	So that's another thing I need to do, Carrie.
	I need to look at in traditional astrology these days of crossing.
	Okay.
	So it's coming into Virgo when it crosses Ceres.
	Remember, Ceres is part of the remnant planet in the asteroid belt, which is where the great war in the heavens and Marduk and Tiamat occurred in ancient times.
	So there was a war of the heavens, if you will.
	It might have been a real war intentionally to destroy a planet.
	And so the asteroid belt is a very powerful region.
	If you read the lost book of Enki, it actually describes the story of coming through between the orbit of Jupiter through the asteroid belt, coming into Earth in some of the earliest visits to our planet very, very well.
	It's an amazing book.
	And so, yeah, that would be the window, the 21st to the 25th of August.
	That's Ceres.
	And then Mars is going to be the, you know, Yon Kippur, the first to the third of October.
	And on these dates, isn't that Scorpio?
	Is that Scorpio?
	Is that what it is?
	Yeah.
	So I need to do that.
	I have to do the astrology windows on the planet process.
	I think that would be great.
	That would be a great thing to do next.
	I mean, that'll be easy to do, right?
	Because it's that math is readily available.
	Okay, so wrap-up comments, David.
	Well, like I said, I would be what I'm going to be doing here is I have my tree antenna networks, which is bioelectric antenna, watching for changes in plant music on these dates, sending out more messages to it on the radio, the Jimmy Blanchett technique.
	Many thanks to Jimmy Blanchett for teaching me this.
	And, you know, also watching our dreams.
	And is it physically going to do something?
	Are going to we're going to see an increase in UFO activity?
	That's what Loeb is prepared for.
	He has all his UFO detection works, a network set up to see if there's, that's also in one of his papers to see if there's an increase in UFO activity.
	And again, this is going to be with us for the next two more years and before it leaves the known planets anyway, the known planets, let alone the far-reaching planets.
	I mean, my formula, this will be one thing I want to show people here, which this will only take a minute.
	Oh, I can't share with you.
	Go ahead.
	I'll stop.
	Okay, so sure.
	Okay, so you're going to see how I get to the orbit of Nibiru with my formula.
	Sitchin said the orbit of Nibiru is approximately 3,600 years.
	So if I take my 591 number times the golden ratio, 1.6180239887, I'm going to do this a whole bunch of times.
	I'm going to pass known planets.
	That's Jupiter.
	That's Saturn.
	I'm going to keep going, keep going and keep going.
	That's Nibiru divided by 365.256 Earth days because these are in days.
	It's just under 3,600 years.
	I take that divided by 3,600 years for Nibiru.
	And it's 99.
	almost 2% accurate to the orbit of Nibiru.
	So my formula does go all the way to Nibiru.
	And on a closing point, the question is, do they know this thing, 3i Atlas, came from beyond the whole solar system?
	Or did it actually come from Nibiru?
	I want to know that because I don't know if they can see far enough to know.
	Oh, really?
	So you're suggesting that it could have actually come from Nibiru?
	I mean, that's like.
	Well, watch.
	I could take the number.
	It's over at the top, isn't it?
	Well, no, let me take the talk about the Anunnaki and then, you know, their planet.
	Let me take the exact number.
	I mean, do you have the exact position of Nibiru, though?
	I mean, is that validated or is this, you know, I mean, is this one of these planets or what?
	NASA has not, astronomers have not validated in a planet at the 3,600 year radius from Earth.
	But watch this.
	Let's take 969.6, which is the exact number of orbital minutes on the axis rotation of 3i Atlas.
	I'm going to multiply that by the golden ratio a whole bunch of times and see how close I get to Nibiru.
	And I'm going to do this.
	I don't know.
	Maybe I won't get to it.
	Maybe I will.
	Let's see what happens.
	I'm going to see how close I get to 3,600 years.
	There it is.
	Divided by 365.256.
	Remember, my starting number was the exact number of minutes of the rotational axis.
	It's 3,620 years.
	I mean, that's what Sitian says is the orbit of Nibiru is 3,600 years.
	Holy cow!
	I just did this calculation live.
	All I started with was the number of minutes of the exact rotational on its axis, 3i Atlas doing this.
	It takes that 969.6 minutes, and I multiplied it by the golden Ratio repeatedly, and I got to an orbit of 3,600 years.
	You know what my accuracy is?
	And again, Sitchin said approximately 3,600 years, but let's say 3,600 divided by this.
	I'm 99.424% accurate.
	That is okay.
	So it sent us, it's telling us where it's from.
	Well, then it came from Nibiru.
	It came and that came from Nibiru.
	It has to be Anunnaki.
	It didn't come from outside the solar system because the solar system.
	Well, it's no, because of at least it's perpendicular, kind of like to our solar system, you know, our data.
	Nobody, it's coming in at this very five degree weird sort of angle.
	Five degrees.
	But I think it technically could be said to be out a good part of the time outside our solar.
	Well, the question is, what do they do on Nibiru?
	I mean, you have to read.
	I've read all of this.
	I've been reading them again because I read them years and years ago.
	And I met Sitchin and I used to write him letters and I was very typewriter answered letter in the mail from him.
	He was so wonderful to take the time to do that for his readers.
	But the calculation I just did took me closer to 3,600 years than my first number.
	My first number was 99.2% accurate.
	This one that accuracy is ridiculous.
	Well, it is because we don't know.
	But I would say the odds of that number multiplied by the golden ratio ending up at 3,620 years.
	Anybody who reads wild that is wild.
	Yeah, that's you can't make this stuff up.
	The thing I like about math, you can't make it up.
	Right.
	So with that, I think that's the closing miracle.
	I think there's food for thought for some people that can, you know, kind of put two and two together with that using mathematics and what they come up with from there.
	So that's very interesting.
	There's more questions I have along those lines, so you have to come back.
	Oh, I'll come back because we'll see what this thing does.
	Is it just going to silently go by and leave a stream of mathematics, or is it going to physically do something?
	That's what I want to know.
	Exactly.
	All right.
	Have a good night, Carrie.
	Thank you so much.
	Thank you, David.
	Great, great work.
	Fascinating, as always.
	And yeah, we got to continue with this.
	Continue.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Take care.
	Thanks, everyone.
	I'm going to run the credits.

▲