All Episodes
July 23, 2024 - Project Camelot
01:41:25
SHOOTER ANALYSIS WITH JOHN CARMAN AND MIKE SPARKS - EXPERTS
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hi, everyone.
We have had some kind of weird things going on here, which I can't understand, and the video suddenly went out on my computer, and we had to do all kind of weird things here, but we are here with John Carman and Mike Sparks, and we're going to be doing an analysis of the shooting, the Trump assassination attempt, really.
And sorry if my video is a little foggy.
I have no idea what's going on here.
So yeah, we'll just bear with it.
And maybe we can fix it in the edit, as they say, and maybe not.
All right.
So welcome, guys.
And why don't you introduce yourselves?
We We had John Carman on our show a long time ago, and it's lovely to have you back, John.
I'm so happy you could make it.
Thank you.
And so I'd like you to give yourself your own introduction, and then we'll do Mike as well.
John Carman, former Secret Service, and a lot of other backgrounds, former military family, uh secret service in 74 to 77 which we'll talk about uh foreign missions division and at the white house nixon ford carter time frame queen elizabeth are protected everybody kissinger everybody so san diego pd after that u.s meant private investigator then u.s customs at the board of 15 years which i'm still
Having some issues with that because they don't like whistleblowers and I don't get a retirement or social security, which prompts me to have a Venmo account.
So here we are.
OK, now I'm going to give people your Venmo account here.
So so thank you, John.
That's a great background.
And that's going to help us a lot in our analysis here.
So Mike Sparks, give yourself an introduction, Mike.
I've had Mike on my show many times.
Oh, good.
Roger.
I'm a former United States Marine Corps NCO and officer, and then I transferred to the U.S.
Army and became an airborne infantry officer.
So, during that time period, I was an active reformer.
designing equipment and giving it to the your uniform services without any you know fees or anything like that just to make the service better that also included writing articles of this new suggestions and books and magazines and videos so you can see the videos since 2006 on YouTube on the channel called Dinamic Para
But they took down our spy channel, so we've been putting both military and spy reforms on BitChute, and that channel name is DinamicPara007.
So, we're currently engaged in reforming both the military and spy worlds.
All of our people are former kinetic action-oriented people, so we're not going to talk in Vague fantasies here today.
We're going to talk about tangible kinetic realities that both John and I have experienced.
Okay, thank you, Mike.
So what I want to do is first let, draw people's attention to the first page, the main page of my Project Camelot.
It's projectcamelotportal.com, my website, so that you can see if, I'm not sure how you got here, but if you can see my articles there.
I've got Got links and also on my telegram.
I've got links and I sent you guys some links regarding this particular drone, which is called again.
I got I don't have it in front of me, but it's it's it's a special drone capability.
So we want to talk about that if possible.
So which one of you wants to start who would like to go first?
I'd like to go first because of, just giving the overall problem, is that the United States of America is too large of a country to be run by a weak federal government.
And when I mean weak, it does not have any safeguards against national reality frauds like what took place On 7-13, 9-11, the JFK, RFK, MLK assassinations, we don't have a mechanism for a public inquest on these events to figure out what happened.
And then the congressmen and senators don't have the technical expertise to ask the right questions to put people Under oath and get answers.
So the country is unorganized.
It's an unorganized mess that's disconnected from physical objective reality that has only gotten worse since 1787 with the advent of television in 1950.
And that's been magnified now by the personal computer in 1995 and the cell phone around, you know, year 2000.
around, you know, year 2000, we don't have any certainty about reality.
We're not finding out what happened under, in a court of law where people are under oath, who if they lie, they will, you know, be punished for perjury.
Instead, we got everybody becoming a sudden expert, you know, gun expert with this gun fetish, talking about angles and bullets and things like that, and making up stories about reality.
I call them, you know, reality deniers.
They'll just deny the whole event even happened.
And who's to, you know, refute them?
There's no way to prevent reality frauds like this, or, you know, secret society takeover of the whole country, because the people, the founding scoundrels, as I call them, Did the 1773 Boston Tea Party.
So they've got a sweet spot in their heart for false flag attacks, and there's no protection in the Constitution against any of these things.
If we were, you know, from 1607 to 1786, a Christian confederation of colonies, The state of Pennsylvania would have conducted this investigation, and if you didn't like what was happening, you could take a day off work, get in your horse and buggy, go to the state capitol, and say, what the heck happened?
What kind of bullets were being shot?
Where's the cartridge cases?
Like, right here's 223.
Was that shot, or was it 22LR?
Where's the body of this so-called crooks guy?
I want to see it!
But you see, if your country is a weak federal government in Washington, D.C., and you've got to go 3,000 miles to go there, it ain't gonna happen.
So they can say and do whatever they want, and there's no oversight.
There's no public inquest.
Okay, now I guess we'll give John... John, you just want to do an introduction to what we're going to get into deeper, so... Yeah, we're going to go deeper.
Let me give people an overview.
I just typed up something real quick that gives me specialized background besides specially trained Secret Service at Bellsville, Maryland, where all the range guys are, the counter sniper teams,
In fact, they take the counter-sniper teams from our unit, which would have been Uniform Division at the time, and there's probably not one agent that ever was on top of the White House, or on top of the EOB next door, or the Blair House across the street, which is where they would have visitors like Queen Elizabeth, who I protected in 76.
But anyway, I interviewed John W. Hinckley himself in front of the White House at 2 in the morning, And engaged him in conversation just to give you a perfect example of my abilities that I determined there was something wrong with him within the first few seconds because I basically engaged him to say, hey, what are you doing hanging around for the White House?
It's like two in the morning, blah, blah, blah.
This is like when he was 19 or 20 years old and I was 21, 22.
Um, clean-shaven, short, 5'9", straight brown hair, maybe glasses or not, don't remember that.
But, um, he wanted to see the President, and I engaged him back and forth, oh, everybody wants to see the President.
What do you want to see the President about?
And then he started going off on a tangent about microwaves in his head in 1976.
Sexually related terms I usually don't report on the air and stuff like that.
Then Jodie Foster.
Okay, that profile alone fits the movie Taxi Driver.
That means he's seen the movie, probably saw it, walked out, he can't discern truth from fiction, and sometimes psychologically imbalanced people attach themselves to a character so that that's what they do, you know?
And then they walk around mumbling stuff related to that.
That's the way their processes are in their brain.
So five years later, after I had left the agency, and there's a lot of history in between, I almost arrested Barbara Walters, I've arrested fence jumpers at the White House at two or three in the morning, and successfully arrested people without having to shoot them.
One jumper actually did get shot before I relieved the guy at the North Portico, which is one of the duty posts.
But I also had the responsibilities of counter-terrorism, counter-sniper, protecting the embassies, like the Russian embassy that was a block and a half away.
And that's been since moved just north of the Lafayette Park.
I've been in the embassies.
I've been involved in protecting against rioters, protest marches, ever since Nixon had left August 9th, 74.
So then it was Ford and then Carter.
Eventually I transferred out For other reasons because of failings, but eventually Hinckley showed up at the Hilton Hotel and shot at Brady Delahunty, the cop who was looking around to look at the president, which you're not supposed to be doing.
McCarthy, the agent who turned around and opened his arms up and he didn't reach for his gun.
He didn't have a vest on.
And if you don't have a vest on, folks, you're going to put your left arm, if you're right-handed, pulling your gun because you've got to get some protection.
That didn't happen, so he learned the hard way.
Reagan still got hit with a flechette disc, is the story.
John Judge would be a good reference to look up on the YouTube channel.
And we believe that Felix Rodriguez C.I.A.
connected to a guy named Poppy Bush that goes way back to 61 and be a pig.
So that's where that kind of goes.
Leading up to me going to different agencies, again, I went to San Diego PD, 1978, then I went to as a private investigator for a year, then I got reinstated back to Treasury, U.S.
Mint at San Francisco, and I investigated and discovered a gold smuggling ring where they were smuggling gold coins out at that time, and I ended up shutting that facility down.
88 5th Street, the Granite Lady building.
Then I transferred over to U.S.
Customs for 15 years, and I was getting drug seizures, arrests, murders, robbers, rapists, smugglers, pedophiles, you name it.
So I'm all familiar with all the pedophile stuff, the military detention disposal camps within the United States, and I believe me and Mike were working on a project to release that information just recently, where other people, including certain congressmen's offices, Uh that I've actually reported to even in San Diego County refused to take action.
Now this is where we get really aggressive about when I'm talking to people at the higher levels and they're refusing to talk to me they're covering up and I was on Fox News right after the assassination attempt with Trump on the 13th and I got on with Fox News OAN which is out of San Diego and did probably 10 minutes just a quick and dirty type report Background information, so on and so forth.
A lot of problems logistically with all the ballistics and the logistical stuff of the platform where the bullets are zipping by.
And then there's people always calling it up to say they thought it was a blood pack.
And I said, no, that was real blood.
I've seen the ear wound.
The tower wasn't secured.
They got a guy that's obviously on a roof.
Now here's the thing.
The platform is here.
I'll just use the platform here.
People think the roof was higher up.
It was not.
The platform was this level.
The rooftop where the other guy was, the sniper, was lower.
That means that everybody could look over and see a guy on the roof across the way on the agriculture building.
Behind the platform is a Secret Service rooftop and they're on a sloped build or sloped top.
Hey folks, there aren't many agents out there playing close details or have ever been on the rooftop.
I have.
Or the EOB, which is next door, which is actually higher than the rooftop of the White House over here.
It's way up high.
The old executive office building, the old War Department, or the old Eisenhower building.
It's the big gray building.
Then it overlooks the West Wing, the South Lawn, the Marine One helicopter where it lands.
So I was called up, go to the third floor, let me in a special laddered area to go up on top of the roof.
So I've been there.
I supported the counter-sniper team.
So now I'm hearing information that the counter-sniper that shot, which is allegedly Jonathan Willis, may not have been actual Secret Service, but a support person from another agency.
Well, he did his job, and if they fired him, he's gonna get his job back.
I'm telling you right now, he took out the sniper, but if it was Secret Service, and I'm gonna dispute anything that Kimberly Cheadle has said, who's since resigned this morning, that she's faltered, she's lied, she's been deceptive on her testimony, she's trying to walk around the investigation.
Part of the problem, folks, is that when DHS Was enhanced or taken over by Tom Ridge back in the day, Michael Chertoff and those guys.
Some of them have dual citizenship, like Michael Chertoff in Israel.
And they took all the agencies, including the FBI and the Secret Services, put it in the big pot, stirred it up and walked away.
They called that DHS.
That was a screw-up because Treasury, U.S.
Secret Service is part of the executive branch.
We are specifically assigned to protect the President of the United States at the executive branch.
There's executive immunity.
There's presidential immunity, which the Supreme Court has just recently decided to go ahead and say, yeah, that's correct.
I've known that all the time.
Do you remember the Monica Lewinsky case?
They tried to subpoena the Secret Service guys.
They had the right to say, I'm sorry, but that's executive privilege, unless they want to divulge it, and force them in closed session to divulge, oh yeah, we saw Monica come in all the time to visit Bill, and they had private sessions in the Oval Office next to the Oval Office in a private den, which most people don't know how that's situated.
But eventually the information will get out.
So the Democrats' case is falling and faltering apart.
Continually.
And now they've attempted to assassinate President Trump, former president, who's going to be the next president, in my opinion.
It's not stopping.
If they've got to the point where they're going to try to kill him, they're going to keep doing it until the election, which is so many, a couple of months out.
This is how they've done it.
And Biden has gone on the record saying he ought to be on the crosshairs, et cetera, et cetera.
Then you've got Maxine Waters have said all kinds of anti-American type things against certain laws.
Kamala Harris and so on and so forth.
They're openly giving out this information, which is committing high treason.
I will tell you this.
If Kimberly Cheadle was allowed to resign, does she collect her retirement for 30 years, which is a joke.
Julia Pierce, if I'm not mistaken, was a previous female director.
And I've talked to lots of female agents, and they didn't believe that they were competent.
And there's some good female agents I've seen, but they're tall, 6 foot and above, 5 foot 10, 6 foot whatever.
They can protect the size person they need to.
And the typical joke is, why did they have this short person the other day, last week?
Who's much smaller?
How could she protect?
She would have to reach up to catch the bullet to the head area.
It won't work.
But there's all kinds of information I could tell you guys.
But I'm telling you, they took out a guy and they keep calling him Crooks.
When in fact, it's probably a guy named Matthew or Maxwell Yerrick.
And the ears are all screwed up and different.
The face is all different.
They're totally two different people.
But Matthew Crooks comes on a video and says, you guys, you guys got the wrong guy.
How obvious.
That's right.
The nose is different, the eyes, the glasses.
Well, I'm not even sure that was him.
But, you know, he was posing.
He's the scapegoat.
Well, he could be just an actor.
He is saying they got the wrong guy.
There's no doubt about it.
The guy was a patsy.
I don't even think he took any of the shots that landed anywhere.
But that's another matter.
We're okay.
Thank you, John.
That's great.
I'm in a great introduction.
I want to continue down those roads with you.
Okay.
Yeah.
So, Mike, I want to come back to you and you heard what John had to say.
What I'd like to do is also look at I mean, we can go to Cheadle.
I'd like to do that towards the later end of this discussion, but I'd like to stay on the scene.
Anything comes to mind.
Also, the shooter in the water tower, which George Webb outed, okay?
And some people said that a person was there.
That's been on the scene.
That might be the actual shooter, maybe.
So, Mike, any thoughts?
Yes, I would start with the best reality we have is the Fox News 5 video that came out a few minutes after it happened.
I listened to it and I heard pop, pop, pop, pop, seven shots.
Trump went down.
Then there were another seven shots, then I heard a pop, a woman scream, and then three more pops.
Now, the first thing that I know, I'm military, I've shot the 556-223 cartridge
for over four decades so I posted a video and that video shows what it sounds like when it's fired from the shooter and also a hundred meters away what it sounds like and it sounds like crack pop it does not sound like pop pop pop actually since I've also shot 22LR
For decades, those pop pop pops to me sound like .22LR, which is a great weapon to assassinate someone because it's not very loud.
And you could have a whole bunch of them going off and everyone could hide their shots in a sea of .22LR bullet shots.
So my first thing that angers me is the crime scene was not secured With yellow tape, everybody out.
I heard the Secret Service was hosing down the roof.
I need to see the cartridge case.
See the cartridge case, what that would look like for 22-223-556?
And I need to see the cartridge cases if it was 22LR.
This is a big deal.
The Mossad assassinates people they like to use.
22 LR and a Beretta Model 22 pistol, because it's very quiet.
These certainties are not being pursued because our country is not organized to find out the truth in national events like this.
And then the people meaning well, like Marjorie Taylor Greene and Senator Hawley, they mean well, but they don't have John's expertise To prevent them from having the wool pulled over their eyes.
They need to be saying, I need to see the cartridge cases.
I need the pictures of the crime scene.
I need to see the body of this Crooks.
How come mom and dad Crooks haven't claimed the body?
Or because if they, I'll try to put a picture on.
John has a comparison picture.
It's clearly, you know, there was shot.
Okay, Michael, I see the body and I know they're distraught.
They should probably say this is not my son.
You see what I mean by the nation?
The investigation is not being held tightly where there's any kind of expertise, technical expertise.
Able to weigh in on this.
Okay, well, let me say this much that the 20-year-old shooter that is a mind-controlled puppet, basically, was given every entree into the grounds, as you may have heard.
He had supposedly a ladder.
It might not have been the size they reported, but it was a ladder.
He came in with a backpack all these things are obviously not allowed normally and he had they said at one point they said he carried in a rifle another time they said it was already in place.
So there was contradictory testimony in that way.
He is part of a gun club.
I don't think he's a crack shooter by any stretch.
I don't think he's a real shooter.
I think that that is out in the mainstream.
They are admitting more than one shooter on the scene.
Do you have anything to say about the water tower?
Did you hear George Webb's testimony on that?
Yes, I think there were a total of three shooters, a total of 18 shots.
And the first series of shots, if it was coming from Yerrick on the AGR building, Trump went down.
Where are the other seven shots coming from?
If Yerrick Crooks, wherever you want to call him, is dead, who's shooting a second volley of pop, pop, pops?
So the theory there is that there's a building, the gymnasium building, behind the AGR building there's a window and people have shown that that's a trajectory that could be plausible in addition to shooter number three in the water tower.
The thing on that is that there are More people being shot, one guy being killed, you know, Corey, the ex-firefighter.
And he's way off, to your audience it'd be, way off to Trump's right or left.
That is way off to be a shot that's coming from Yerrick Crooks, from the AGR building, or even the building behind them.
It's window.
You see what I mean?
There's that person getting shot.
Now, the guy that testified to that, not under oath, but he's an emergency room doctor named Joseph Fine.
We have it on our Bitchute, the interview.
He says the guy was hit behind the head, And dead, he tried to help him, but a woman also nearby was shot in the arm.
What's her name?
How come her name's not been posted?
What about her?
And I got video footage of him being dragged out by four state troopers, and then the woman, we can see her being injured too and being carried out.
So those are the people off to the, you know, left.
When you were looking at it from the Fox News 5 video, Trump's right.
But then there's supposedly someone over here was hit because one of the bullets went and hit this cherry picker and hit the hydraulic and when it went down.
So there's a lot of shots.
I counted 18.
Why can't people think for themselves and look at the evidence instead of jumping on some bandwagon?
Right now the bandwagon is The ineptitude of the Secret Service, which I don't think was ineptitude, I think was complicity.
Those people need to be arrested.
Everybody involved needs to be arrested and put under oath, under threat of perjury, so we can shake out the truth from them.
But that's a bandwagon.
Everyone gets on that easy, mock-the-Secret-Service-slope-roof bandwagon.
Then another bandwagon was the sound analysis a few days later.
And everyone's going, the sound shows three shots.
Well, yeah, duh!
I said that on 713.
I counted 18 shots.
So I say to everyone, go watch the Fox News 5 video before anyone could, you know, censor it or twist it.
It's like the Zapruder film of 713.
Count the pops.
The pops do not sound like Two, two, three, five, five, six, because it would be crack pop.
I just hear pop, pop, pop.
So anyway, I count 18.
Who's this woman screaming horribly, you know, after the first seven, seven, and then a woman scream?
You see how we have to be more focused and pay attention to details?
How is that going to happen when you don't have the crime scene sealed?
And good faith investigators, you know, finding the bullets, here's a bullet, putting a reverse trajectory stick in it, and doing this hard work to get down to the bottom of the truth.
That's not happening.
Okay, now, thank you, Mike.
So, important points.
John, if you want to address any of the points that were made there by Mike, go right ahead.
I would like you to also talk about the positioning of the so-called secret service agents and whether or not you think they actually were secret service.
Also address that.
I'll try to hit every point that we can.
I wanted to tell you guys also the actual firearms training I did do at Beltsville, Maryland.
They call it the Rawlings Center now.
Very extensive.
I had no problem with that.
I was shooting since I was a kid, 8 to 10 years old.
Back then, I've been shooting since Camp Pendleton as a Cub Scout, Boy Scout.
Uh, and in Texas, uh, and then finally Secret Service.
We shot every day for 30 days.
We shot every month for every month.
We shot every quarter to qualify.
So every month, every quarter, biannually and annually, I'm a distinguished expert, which means I shot 295 to 300 every time consistently at the range, consistently for three months to three years consistently.
So I'm a distinguished expert.
Never thought I'd be able to have to tell people that, but I'm telling you now that's quite a big status because we are the best shots in the world usually, but I was the best of the best in my class and other people there.
Martial arts trained, black belt and all that stuff.
So it's quite extensive.
Uh, .38s, .357s, 9mm subsonic, 147 grain Uzis, which is a hot load for the fully automatic submachine gun back then, and they've switched to move up to MP5s and 9s and all kinds of other updated semi-automatics and so forth.
The training is still basically the best.
So, when you look at these guys, Three shooters.
I agree with Mike on a lot of those things.
Three shooters.
I saw the people get hit in the videos showing the people in the upper left-hand corner of the stands.
The guy that got hit in the head, he went down.
Another person went down right below him.
Other people got hit off to the right of them, but it's all at the level of the shooter at the roof.
That is lower than the Secret Service counter-sniper team across the way.
And behind the rooftop where the alleged shooter, we think it's Rurik, were three windows.
Two showed shadows.
Number one, number three, or number one, number three.
Either way, left to right, right to left, were open because they caused a shadow.
I'm not sure about number two.
But they could have had another set of shooters, people in the parking lot.
The shooter did have a device in his hand, which was a dead man switch to set off bombs or EOD devices, which I'm also trained in because that's part of our training.
EOD training, they set bombs off the Russian embassy just a block and a half away from the White House.
Back in those days.
So we got three potential shooters.
I want to go to this part, but well, let me hit those Secret Service guys.
The alleged counter sniper team, if they're set up there, it was hot that day and they'll put up special mats.
They got tripods for their rifles and all that.
If they were out there setting up and they didn't have a pre-walkthrough like they supposedly had, and then depended on local law enforcement, local law enforcement failed.
They also had a guy that claimed that an law enforcement official contacted the alleged shooter, Rerek, aka Maybe Crooks, on top of the roof.
And when he confronted the guy, he threatened him and he ran away.
A badge ran away.
No, that's not how it works.
The point of the guy with the badge is to confront them, and if necessary, shoot the threat until it's gone.
We don't get to use the word kill, 007 terminology, and all that.
And the most recent was testified as to neutralize the threat.
Okay, that's nice.
That guy didn't do his job.
Three shooters, one on the roof, maybe people at the windows, maybe even somebody in the parking lot and near a car.
But if you were to draw a V-shaped area like that going to the stands and extend it out a little bit more towards the tree line, the parking lot, then you got a 90 degree angle of potential shooters all throughout this section, left to right, parking lot.
Windows numbers 1, 2, and 3.
Then you got the Crooks aka Rurik guy.
Then off to the building in the parking lot, you got potential shooters at that angle.
Once we get out of that area, then it gets weird.
Way off to the right is a tower that you can't see off camera.
Way up high.
Now, I'm telling you right now, I've been on towers before.
I've been on top of the Washington Monument as Secret Service, and they tried to close down the people in the Washington Monument because Marine One was coming to pick up the President back then.
All I did was flash my credentials, Secret Service.
Oh, okay, you guys are okay.
And they closed the whole monument off because nobody could be at the top of the tower at the Washington Monument because they could possibly have a weapon.
It's weird because it's usually sealed off, but that's to give you an idea.
That overlooks the White House, the Ellipse, the whole area where the path of the President is.
So it's the same thing.
You got a tower in the area, and if you climb up, it's usually sealed off with a locked gate, a door gate, and you open it up.
Then you have to go through a man tunnel, and then you go up a higher tower.
Then you get up to the ridge where the actual rail is, where it's got a circular fenced area.
That's usually gated off or locked.
Then there's another, an alleged ladder, which is curved that goes to the top of the nipple or the point at the top of the water tower.
They're claiming that somebody was around the other, I'm sorry, around the backside, hiding at the right moment, and then they showed a shadowy figure coming out, like a UFO that you would see on Coast to Coast or something, Art Bell or whatever.
That still has a bit confirmed.
And then may have gotten off with the, correct me if I'm right, Mike, because I always get that term, a zipline is the term.
Yeah, it's going to be an angle.
In other words, you take your carbiner, hook it up, and you just fly down into the bushes, into the trees, disappear really quick.
That's what I would do if it was a zipline, do that instead of another technique.
But why didn't the Secret Service take those guys out?
They should be watching the tower.
Why was it their position up higher with a Secret Service agent?
One agent would have been enough just to keep it secure.
Law enforcement could have been up there.
One officer, two officers to keep it secure.
The buildings weren't secured.
The aircraft, I'm sorry here, The air conditioning units, these big air conditioner units with the big fans, that's where the alleged weapon was hidden.
So that means somebody had time to go in the night before, when nobody was looking, and wrap it up somewhere, stick it under one of these air conditioning units or under or behind it.
Pull it out when this guy's walking around with an alleged, I'll use this as a prop, one of those pathfinders, GPS locators or special scopes so they can find out how many meters, how many yards, how many feet.
And he's walking around innocently like it's nothing.
Well, he's still suspect because he's outside the zone.
And now that I brought that up, when they said that the secured zone was about 100 yards, They walked past that another 40 yards, 300 feet, 350 feet, something like that.
That means that that means, well, we didn't have to cover that because it was outside the perimeter of the security area.
That's false.
That's wrong.
They screwed up.
Every area in that area, if you could shoot a rifle, a bullet always goes at least a mile.
And if you look on a package of 22s, it says on the side, one mile range.
So why would they not secure it for a full mile or secure the whole area with a perimeter with nothing but cops, local troopers, and law enforcement?
And as you get in towards the inner circle, you get uniformed division, counter sniper teams, canine officers, and then the agents are the last group that actually surround the president.
That's the last cover, human bubble.
There's a lot of information I'm throwing out there.
No, I appreciate that.
Now, I want to ask you, okay, this is a failure of the so-called Secret Service, right?
Would you say, right?
I mean... And law enforcement.
And law enforcement, okay.
And that the Secret Service had to be under orders from someone.
Who is in charge of them?
Because this woman, Cheadle, does not appear to even have the experience.
The way she talked about the scene was, when she did, was, it seemed to me, brain dead.
It didn't make sense what she said.
Yeah, she would normally be in Washington, D.C.
She's a political appointee.
I've seen the pattern before.
Julia Pierce was the previous one, if I remember the name correctly.
Most people work 20 years, retire out.
That's the time frame.
When I was in Secret Service, everybody got $11,600 a year in 1974, just to throw that in there.
$600 a year in 1974, just to throw that in there.
That's dedication.
When you become a director, and the director at that time was H. Stewart K-N-I-G-H-T.
Anybody can look it up.
It's like after World War II, and when Secret Service was more active in certain areas, some of these guys got pulled in, former military and so forth.
Those are the kind of guys we needed because they had military experience, just like Mike here has, and people with actual backgrounds.
And when they switched and had White House police, Then they finally turn him into the uniformed division and then highly trained Secret Service officials.
Julia Pierce, the previous one, didn't have that kind of background training.
They had problems with people shooting at the White House, spraying the building with AK-47 bullets.
Kimberly Cheadle, on the other hand, worked in an office in D.C.
at the 1800 G Street location, and she was not on site at that time.
Usually, it's a special agent in charge in that area, or the detail agent would be in charge of the detail with Trump, so he would have a detail agent who would be head of that.
If anybody's going to be in charge of that, it would be the detail agent, possibly an agent in charge of that area.
But whoever gave the orders, alleged orders that still haven't been confirmed yet, to stand down, ought to be arrested for high treason.
So you don't know, because I've even received communications on a high, a special high security radio at Customs, where somebody's trying to tell me not to do something.
And I come back with, identify yourself, what's your call sign?
That transmission went out all over sector.
Everywhere on a high-frequency secured line.
That means that guy would be caught with his voice trying to tell somebody not to do something or wait or whatever.
Now that's a decoy shot.
That means if they're trying to get the guy to be decoyed to watch one target while the windows are open, another potential target Maybe a potential with a tower, which we haven't proven yet because it's a high angle up there, way up high.
We're getting people who are shot laterally from left to right, to the stand, from the building, the agriculture building, from the open windows, from the parking lot, at the lower level.
Lower level.
The top where the shooter was at a lower level.
The counter sniper team at a much higher level.
Even the people at the stands where the rally was, those people could look off and see somebody.
But he was wearing a special colored pants, special colored shirt, could have blended in with kind of a grayish color.
But he was up there.
The point is, if you see a guy with a gun, that's it.
You take it out.
You look for more targets and you confirm.
One target down.
Go locate it.
Go secure that scene.
Secure that area.
They're not doing that stuff.
It's all, it's all happenstance, but I'm trying to restructure and recover what should have happened and how it would look to me.
But they could have had four or five shooters and maybe one or two could have got away from a moving vehicle off of a highway, way back past the parking lot, way past the roof where the, where Yerrick or Brooks was, and way past the other building with the three windows.
You see what I mean?
I talked about the shooting at the Mandalay Bay in Vegas as well.
That was from helicopters at a distance also.
Go ahead.
Okay, and what about the idea of the drone?
Is there any possibility that something went on from the drone?
Okay, some people are talking about drones.
I'll tell you this, you can't fly drones in the District of Columbia, and I've reported drones usage since 1991, personally to the Agency of Secret Service.
They always use drones as a preemptory surveillance tool.
If that wasn't used, that's a big fail right there.
Now, you could use a drone.
They have drones even put out in the movies.
I think White House down with Gerard Butler, who's an excellent actor, Scottish actor, playing a Secret Service agent.
And it's always usually with Morgan Freeman as a president.
The North Koreans were coming and dropping all kinds of drones.
And if you go to YouTube, you could pull up a There's an assassination tool, a drone would fly out, and it's got a special projectile attached to it, so if it attaches itself to a person's head, that's all it takes is to hit the head, boom, it explodes.
Whoops, looks like, oh, you switch, oh, those kind of drones.
Right, well, that's another.
No.
I don't believe they used a military-grade full-size drone in that area, because if they did, it would have been all over the air, and that's a restricted airspace, right off the bat.
Everywhere the president is, former presidents, even Bush, Carter, Obama, Clinton, is a restricted airspace.
Okay, but you're assuming that there was, I mean, they were following protocol.
It doesn't appear that they followed protocol on any level.
And that's a different drone.
That's a different drone.
I'm talking about small drones for observational.
The one that was positioned on the camera just shows a huge military-grade type drone that they would actually bomb or shoot or do that in the military.
Okay, now I have another drone that was something, you know, I don't know.
They said the shooter, the Patsy, had a drone.
I don't know what they mean.
He did have a package or bag, could have been a tool bag, but if it was me, you're either going to take some liquids, you're going to take some sort of food and extra ammunition, or maybe the device he was going to use.
Can you see what I put on the screen?
Yes, those are portable drones.
They would use those for camera type devices so they could secure and look at the area to see what they're dealing with and who's where.
I don't believe that the suspect had a drone.
He's too busy using a gun, and he's not having enough time to go up and play around with a drone.
A third person could have had a drone.
Another team member could have had a drone.
But again, even Secret Service has drones, and if they have a drone in the area, they're supposed to shoot it down, just like in D.C.
They had one guy that came up with a drone, got caught off Constitution Avenue, which is south of the White House, south of the Ellipse, south of where the Washington Monument is, and further south is the Constitution Avenue, goes left or right, allegedly parked his car, got out to the park, playing around with a drone, and took it all the way to the White House grounds.
Totally restricted.
In a lot of areas, and I'll tell this for the audience out there, you can have a drone, a small portable drone, people play with them, you can handle it within 300 feet, 100 yards.
Once you get above about 500 feet, then it becomes an FAA issue, Federal Aviation Administration.
Aircraft.
Yes.
Those kind of things.
I've heard that.
If it gets into the flight paths between that height to a helicopter, then you can interfere.
Besides privacy and snooping and those other things.
And there's all kinds of cases.
I could talk about drones, but anyway.
All right, well, there is, I'm putting another slide here, which is the crowd behind him.
So, this character, this disguise is called Fusco.
I don't know if you're familiar with him.
Yeah, yeah, I've seen him.
He's a lot of actors.
I watched the video very carefully.
He's, you know, they're all different people.
They're different heights.
Sometimes they vary the disguise in certain key ways, like the hat covers more of the face or whatever it happens to be.
So just saying that he was there, he had a yellow rag.
Are you familiar with a yellow rag?
Yes, I watched the video very carefully.
I'm aware of who he is, who people think he is.
I watched the reaction of all the people in the stands as best I could find on video.
He's not a normal person.
Fusca, Fusco, whatever.
He's looking left.
He's looking right.
And as the shots are firing, he was already starting to look down, and then the shots went off.
Actually, he doesn't flinch.
He does not flinch, and he also, he stared straight at Trump.
That's correct.
He was full frontal when the shots were fired, as I recall.
Exactly.
Yeah.
I kind of wonder, because... Because he didn't duck.
He didn't... Well, with my background, you wonder, is he the woman in red?
I think he was Secret Service in disguise.
Well, I disagree, but that's okay.
All right.
It would be like comparing him to the woman in red at Dealey Plaza, so that when the limousine hits a certain point, that's when they have to start firing to make sure that some target goes down.
But he seems to be an innocent bystander, where we've had people that would wait outside the White House on midnights.
We had a lady we'd call a crazy married.
Heavy set, overweight, with a shopping cart, and she would sit there and I would tell my guys, I'd say, how come everybody lets this woman sit out here?
She could have electronics on her.
She could have a bomb on her.
And they would have crazy people show up.
After a while, they'd show up so many times.
They become part of the structure, they ignore them, they let it go.
That's a mistake.
They did the same thing near the Russian Embassy, up the street, just from the White House, Aeroflot, which is the Aeroflot building next to the Russian building at 1609 16th Street and L, Cross Street, right below that's a Hilton.
And after the woman that showed up overnight a couple times, Third, fourth, fifth night, somebody put a stack of newspapers from the Washington Post from behind the building, because the Washington Post is behind that embassy at that time, on the opposite street, on 15th Street.
A bomb goes off, and I was a block and a half away.
That's how loud it was.
I ran to the embassy.
Those guys that were in the front got raised up off their feet, and it was not a destructive type of a bomb.
It was more to scare them and let them know that they got that close.
That's all that.
Okay, but I have to say that I do know some things about Fesco.
I was at Patriot Double Down in Vegas where Juan O'Salvin was speaking on the stage.
At the time, there was a Fesco character there.
He was leaning on a pole right next to the stage.
I went right up to him.
I wanted to see how tall he was to be able to help identify who was wearing the disguise.
He was just a little bit taller.
I'm around 5'5".
He was just slightly taller than me, so he was not tall, he was not six feet, he was not above six feet.
No, he's usually shorter, so that's a good assessment.
And there is a painting of the Fesco character in a certain setting, also having to do with John, John, who they say did go in that disguise from time to time.
I'm just saying that there are multiple possibilities for the Costco character.
In this particular situation, he did have a very bright yellow rag in his pocket, which I'm sure, which the camera saw, like it's on the footage, and so I'm not sure what that meant, but I think it meant something.
I think it was a signal.
He had no reason to have that bright yellow thing there.
He also popped up he he stood on some kind of um like first he was low down and then he was up much up much more prominent in the in the the stands if you call it so there there was something with that he was doing some signaling he was also yelling at one point you could see him put his hands up to his face like that and he was yelling I've seen the other people in the stands, and he's not the only one that had one of those yellow scarves or whatever.
Oh, really?
He did not indicate that he was signaling, but I still looked at him.
I looked at other people, I evaluated other people, how they reacted.
Some flinched, some jumped, some ducked down.
People were getting hit.
He's not reacting, which is weird.
Not at all.
He seemed to suspect it.
I've seen him before.
He would go down in history as the mystery guy.
That's what it is.
It's just a distraction.
Alright, perhaps.
In my opinion.
Personally, I think because the White Hats were on the ground, the White Hats had a team.
You may not be familiar with those guys, but I am.
I'm familiar with the White Hats.
And I can say that we believe they were on the scene.
They were warned something would happen.
I don't think they knew what I don't think they knew the position of all the shooters.
I definitely think the distraction was the young guy on the roof.
But can I add something?
Yeah, can you come in here, Mike?
Yeah, what you're both describing is called guilty demeanor.
What they were doing?
Sure.
And all of the people in those stands, bleachers, I would have arrested all of them and made them make a sworn test.
I'm not being... No, I'm not laughing at you.
There should have been a contingence of the entire crime scene and everybody involved People in the bleachers, people walking outside, all of them would have been locked down, should have been locked down, like we do in the military.
When we have a missing weapon, we lock everybody down on post, on base, till we find that missing weapon.
That should have happened here.
Everybody should have not gone anywhere until they identified themselves, Where they were at the time, and then the ones that are really looking guilty with demeanor, they're taken away and immediately interrogated under oath.
That did not happen.
Everybody dispersed.
So this guy with the guilty demeanor is akin to the JFK umbrella man, who later on, years later, supposedly came to the House Armed Services Committee, the select committee on the JFK assassination, and he lied, if it was really him, saying, I was just there because it might have rained.
It's so obvious, he's got his umbrella open, it's not raining, right by the Stemmons Freeway sign, you know, when you look in the Zapruder film.
But the point is, I still think we could do that with the, you know, Fox News 5 footage, If this was being investigated by competent Elliott Ness Untouchables type people, they would identify everybody in that bleachers.
I agree, I agree.
There was also a woman.
That looked like a secret service agent.
I do have something to say about the flinching thing.
It's very possible That these people were told it was going to be a soft assassination attempt.
That means, don't worry, we're just going to be shooting these almost relatively harmless bullets.
You don't have to duck.
It's not high power.
I'm just throwing it out there, the soft assassination theory.
Would explain why people would not flinch because anyone in the right mind in the line of fire of any bullets would flinch and get down.
So I'm thinking maybe they were told it was going to be this, you know.
Harmless almost 22.
Just throwing it out there.
Okay.
Because I have other evidence of 22.
The FBI lied in a local newspaper.
They were talking about crooks again.
They said crooks bought a box of 50 22s.
You know, but they're saying they were 2-2-3's.
Guess what?
I called the Allegheny Gun Shop.
They only sell 2-2-3, 5-5-6 in boxes of 20.
So the FBI told this local news reporter that Crooks bought a box of 50 bullets.
The only box that you could get with 50 at the Allegheny Gun Shop Or 22s, which coincides with my first observation is that I heard 18 tiny little bullet shots on 713 from the Fox News 5 video.
You can't buy 50 of these at the Allegheny shop.
Yeah, we've talked about this too, me and Mike, because we go back and forth over these details.
And I have to interject the thing about reacting to the bullets.
I've been into the range.
Mike's been to the range many, many, many years, just like I have.
And when you see who reacts in the crowd, which is interesting.
Some people may not be too good on the ears.
Some might be deaf.
Some people definitely reacted.
A .22 or .22 long rifle fired within 100-150 yards is going to crack.
within 100, 150 yards is going to crack.
And we even heard ka-chunk, ka-chunk, ka-chunk type.
That's the ramp going back and forth or the rail back and forth when it ejects and fires, ejects and fires.
But certain people reacted to even a 22 or 22 long rifle noise.
A .223 is much bigger and fatter and thick.
And I don't know if Mike's got another sample of a 223...
There you go.
Hold it up real close to the camera there, buddy, because that's a fat 22.
That thing is so powerful and loud, it's going to make a loud noise.
So, it didn't happen that day.
That's what I'm saying.
We agree that it's probably a 22 22 long rifle.
Smaller amount.
That'll do the job.
And there was an old movie called Day of the Jackal.
They used mercury tip bullets back then to describe what probably happened in Dallas because a mercury tip bullet will explode And I used to protect the actual JFK limousine in Washington, D.C.
at 1310 L Street.
No longer there.
They moved it.
And they had purposely let us see the vehicle, but we couldn't go inside or touch anything.
Whether they cleaned it or not, you could take a nice clean cloth or a scarf and you could probably find some remnants of mercury.
They don't want anybody to know that.
The big cover-up by the Secret Service, also in 74, when they made us watch the Zapruder film, frame 313 was altered, which shows the actual direction of fire
uh from the seven o'clock to two or seven to one with the blood spatter and all that stuff they erased it out and deleted it and they still told us that this agent told us oh the official agency answer is or the profile of the policy is the warrant commission report wcr and that's and he didn't take any questions that day we had guys who were ex-marines ex-paratroopers
And they wanted to ask all kinds of questions because Oswald wasn't in the building at the time of the shooting, etc, etc.
It hasn't changed.
They're still setting up the lie.
Yeah.
Old male shooter, you know?
Yes, yes.
The lone gunman fallacy.
Yes.
Absolutely.
Okay, so just want to say that there was, there is actually, well let me show this on my screen here, if I can get this on the screen properly.
So hold on.
Okay, so I've got this on my website.
So there's a guy named Tony Saruga, at least that's how he's signing himself.
And I think he might be known from other videos.
But at any rate, he said they tracked what you read here.
Now, I don't know if you guys read this before the show.
They said it's a water tower sniper.
Escaped using a zip line.
This is where that information came.
And he said with 100% confidence, based on cell phone data, that particular sniper was FBI and S. L. V. S. U. V. I'm sorry, was registered to the Department of Agriculture for what?
For what?
Let me tell you something interesting.
Okay.
When we used to get our Treasury checks, we get them from the Department of Treasury, right?
When I went to training at this particular DC training, 19 weeks, then we go to a special facility at Beltsville, Maryland.
Guess where it's at?
It's at the Agriculture Department on land that's specifically hidden In the agricultural lands, federal land, as of what, 20 something years ago, they changed the treasury checks to reflect the agriculture.
So, if you get an APHIS check or an ACH in your direct deposit, even a refund from the IRS, It's agriculture because the way they transferred it back to that agency was to handle it.
Agriculture is getting too big for their pants, and I was cross-designated FDA and 40 other agencies when I was at the border, but there's such an unusual thing.
So, I'm used to seeing government license plates
uh agriculture you know gs11 or gs whatever and that's their designator so if that's the case and i did see that several days ago that's pretty damning information to say well if they had a backup shooter or the shooter that's supposed to actually get away they could have ran up to the the highway there behind the parking lot made a couple of shots drove off nobody knows any difference that's a third fourth shooter
A tower shooter, Crooks, or A.K.A.
Yerrick, and somebody from the windows, or not?
Exactly, yeah.
So that is, I think, quite detailed information, just saying, worth bringing into this story here.
Okay, is there anything else that we haven't touched on in this sort of scenario?
Because, you know, there could have been other shooters in the crowd.
There could have been shooters, I'm just throwing this out, that were in the stands behind Trump because there was this idea early on that the bullet came from behind.
Well, let me describe something about the photographers, because I know they have photographers at the John W. Hinckley site, and I don't necessarily, I didn't bring it in, but I'm the guy that actually interviewed John W. Hinckley in 1976 in front of the White House in 76 at like 2 in the morning.
I think I did that in the intro.
What's interesting is when he showed up at the Hilton that day, who surrounds that area around the limousines for the Secret Service and the President are photographers.
They have introduced this stuff for many years, that they have weapons disguised that look like a telephoto zoom lens with a trigger situation, or they could have an activator, make it like they're taking pictures, and they might shoot a different type of a weapon.
It could be an air pistol, a flechette disc, John Judge is a good person on YouTube.
He used to be associated with the Intel family in Washington and Langley areas.
But what's interesting, I saw a video where a couple of camera people were waiting permission for the Secret Service guy to come up.
So yeah, go ahead.
and go around to the side and he motioned them around to the back towards the front left corner which would be you facing the stand would be the right front corner where the photographers they had photographers off to the left as soon as the shots were firing those guys would move right in Like, they didn't have any concern for their safety.
Yes.
Which is interesting.
It was like, those guys were a threat to me.
I would be pulling my gun to everybody coming up.
Everybody.
Okay, I have a question on that that I don't want to forget, so I'm going to interrupt you right here.
Go ahead.
When the shots were fired and Trump went down, started to go down, Everyone who came to him was running from what I would consider a distance too far away, because none of those people could have thrown their body in front of him to protect him.
That's correct.
So therefore he was unprotected from the get-go.
That's correct.
All the other stages that you might see, the agents are usually on the corner of the stage, same level, so they could jump over in a split second.
I'm six foot three, Trump is six foot three.
I guess Cheadle didn't know how tall Trump was.
And I won't joke about Barron this week.
But the point was they had to have people on the stage.
They didn't.
Yeah, it's insane.
They had people on the stage when Hillary Clinton was there, a big black agent who's no longer with us.
He would go up and actually touch her on the shoulder to let her know he's right there.
Yes.
He's right there.
They had a disturbance.
That's what it does.
They'll have a fake disturbance in one area, but a shooter could be off to another area because that's how they do a decoy.
So you're absolutely correct on that one, Kerry, because they should have had agents on the stage So they could be there in a moment's notice to take the bullet if necessary.
Yeah, down past what you're supposed to do.
And he supposedly had a chest a vest on and I don't know if you saw this one, but they also showed a picture.
of the right flannel section of his pockets that looked like it could have had an indentation where a possible bullet may have hit because his material is also bulletproof material like Kevlar.
I haven't confirmed that, but that's very possible.
I would.
And I wore a vest back in 1974, a Second Chance vest, where they didn't even issue us vests back then, yet.
That's going far back.
Second Chance vest, 1974.
So, if he had his vest on, he was protected in that way.
And then, of course, you could hear the click.
Then he did this like a swat of a mosquito, and then he went down.
Yes.
He went down on his own.
Yeah.
He was scrambling at that time.
Then they're covering him with a human shield, which is their training.
And then they're holding him down at a certain point.
They're checking him to make sure he's okay, making sure he didn't get hit.
And during that time, they're radioing and stuff.
I didn't see very many agents pulling their gun at that time.
No.
Let me tell you this.
There's three or four people assigned immediately to his body.
One might even grab the back of his belt.
I've seen a female agent do that.
That's kind of interesting.
Pull the belt so you can pull him away real quick.
The most important part of the body is right up here.
Right.
That's what they want to protect, the head.
And obviously with Trump that wasn't happening.
Well, one agent was actually putting his hand over his head as they walked him off later, right off the stage.
Yeah, well, a little too late.
I just want to draw— He had his hand on his head right there, too.
Yeah well see see the picture again and we're looking at very shortly after this is uh you know really I don't know if it's seconds or minutes or a minute but I sense seconds uh you got the woman who is too short to guard him He was clearly, uh, if you missed the first time, you could get him right here.
Okay, no problem.
Uh, the other thing is that I had some people, you see the blood, I had some people, there's, uh, Trump has given a speech, um, and there's, it argued whether this is actually Trump or a double.
Okay, there's some issue with that.
That's not a double.
And you know that why?
Because I've observed these photos and these videos of much more extensively because that is my background, especially in US.
I process four to five million humans at the border.
Therefore, I can look at the faces.
I could tell you the differences of the imperfections in their face.
The eyes, the ears, the nose, and the lips, especially the ears as an identifier.
Right.
When I see these things, I could tell if that's a real fleshy person, and those are fleshy people, humans, not something else over off to the left extreme where you want to get some people to try to convince you that they're wearing a mask.
I know all this stuff, too.
I've had people try to debunk and say, oh, Bill and Hillary up in Santa Barbara, and they were at a hospital.
And I said, yeah, that's the real ones.
You know why?
Because I've seen them up close and personal in San Diego.
After they landed at NAS Coronado, in their limousines, go to Hotel Dell, And I went there specifically to see them because another female agent I work with wanted to see them.
So we went through.
I flashed a credential.
I talked to the guy, verified my background, even in Secret Service.
Went to the courtyard.
They came out up close and personal.
I can identify them.
Okay, a lot of people don't get it.
They don't have the background.
They don't have the training of looking at these people and seeing them.
I would look at his ear in particular And see other photos of the same era, just like I can discern Michael Jackson from the other Michael Jackson that's not real, or the Princess Diana.
And I appreciate that.
Okay, so let's, but we're going to look at something else here.
So the thing is that Trump has given a speech, and I'm going to see if I can get the right Yeah, so do you see this?
Okay, so here is the top of the ear after the thing.
A few seconds later, they're moving him down the road here.
I just wanted to draw your attention to that, to the blood again.
I have somebody saying, Trump saying, first of all, that he put his hand to his ear And I guess he went down and then when he came up, he said, this is what Trump said on the stage at the RNC.
His hand was covered with blood.
Now, his hand was not covered with blood, but he seems, you know, he was in shock.
So we don't know, you know, what one thinks under those circumstances.
But as far as we know, when he did the fist, and I've got a picture of the fist somewhere around here.
I'll find that one.
Here it is.
So you see that he does is not his fist is the same hand.
It's not covered in blood.
For some reason, that was his memory.
I'm just saying he made a mistake on stage.
And and and I think We're talking real blood, a real hit, but for some reason his memory was his hand was covered with blood.
It was obviously not.
Okay, just saying.
The point is, he reached up with his open hand to touch himself and when he did the fist, he had a closed fist.
Right, that's true.
You don't know what was on the inside.
That's one point.
Yeah.
Second point is, go back a picture and show the hand around the female agent that he's being carried down.
That means there's going to be blood transfer on some of those agents.
Blood transfer.
That's the key phrase.
So his right hand is near that female jacket and so forth.
I'll bet you money that those agents will have blood transfer on them.
Right.
It's not a simple blood pack from Hollywood.
That's real blood, in my opinion.
I've seen it before.
Fair enough.
And you're going to have blood on the agents that walked him down.
And he also had that red cap that people were really getting confused with.
I said, yeah, they reached down to get the cap.
It was a big deal.
No, get my hat.
Get my hat.
Because it's a big deal.
That's going to be a souvenir or something.
Somebody even tried to put a thing out about a shoe that they showed later up by the stage one time.
And I said, that was fake.
They're trying to say that was a hint or a symbol of something.
You know, when they leave a shoe behind or something.
Yeah.
And I go, no, come on.
They didn't walk them off without a shoe.
Come on.
That's ridiculous.
Okay.
And he was saying, get my shoes, get my shoes.
He said, get my shoes.
He said, get my shoes.
Yeah.
Okay.
I didn't hear that.
Yeah.
That's what I heard, but okay.
We can, everyone can rewind and listen.
All right.
Mike, anything to say about any of this?
Yes.
Questioning the blood splatter line across Trump's cheek.
John, what do you think of that?
Well, if you go, if you get hit as hard as he did, I can accidentally, I'm really bad with shaving, but sometimes I might accidentally hit the edge of the cartilage, and I'll bleed like a bleeding out pig sometimes, and I have to put paper or cotton or paper towel or something on there, so there's a lot of blood, even with the arteries in that area.
And hopefully it didn't go in the one centimeter that they bragged about because he would have been dead.
And there's a carotid artery that goes right below that area too.
But the blood is consistent.
The pattern of going towards the off the ear into the cheek area because he's bent down by that time.
But again, it had to come, that shows that it came from behind.
Well, he remember he turned his head and got nicked by the edge of the ear from the side.
And if he turned his head one more inch, he would have got it in the head.
So it hit from the side from the right, not necessarily the back.
So I would say from where the sniper on the roof direction that direction.
OK, I have to assume from what I see the lack of damage.
I have to think that it was.
A tiny .22 hitting his ear.
The damage doesn't seem consistent with this coming at 3,000 feet per second.
Correct.
Hitting your ear.
I agree.
That's a good point.
Now there was somebody that said they thought it was one of those printed guns that you make out of a Xerox machine.
Right.
That's why the sound was so sort of unusual.
Well, they did that in the movie with John Malkovich, Clint Eastwood, in the line of fire, where he used a composite material so he could get it past the magnetometers, and then he snuck a single round of a nine millimeter, whatever, hollow point or otherwise, inside of a rabbit's foot.
Then when he got the chance to put it in there, all you need is a firing pin.
The barrel doesn't matter.
It's a use once, throw away thing.
And with a composite with space age plastic these days, the epoxy is just unbelievable.
You know, so no metal or nothing that would detect on a metal detector.
Well, here's the thing I'd say is that we know for sure that they found a body on the AGR building and some kind of weapon.
So we know with certainty that the feds could cough that thing up in a public press conference and let us look at it and see.
We'll have a dummy, of course.
This is live.
Well, they did the same thing in the Oswald situation where they had the Manalik or Carcano Raised up and all the media is taking a picture of the weapon.
So that's that's the whole showboating of the whole thing.
But we found the weapon.
Here it is, and he's hold.
Hopefully got a glove on to do that, but I think me and Mike have been on top of this thing since the beginning because we've been talking since the 13th and before that.
And the thing about the small round is very important for people to understand the trauma from a fully loaded 223.
Is humongous.
A .22 is just enough to zip by, cut you, and hit you, or even in the head, it could kill you.
That's enough.
And I caught a kid at China Lake when I was on that military base years ago, hammering a .22 outside the residential area.
And I went over there and took it away from him.
I said, what are you doing?
You're going to get hurt.
What did he do?
He had already hit himself and the shrapnel broke because the way he hit it.
So, he was firing off .22s in a residential area, and we had to take him to the dispensary, you know, because he got shrapnel.
Those things are dangerous.
People don't get it.
The .22 is commonly used.
Me and Mike talk about this all the time.
The Massad uses these small calibers all the time.
It's real easy to muffle the sound.
You could silence it.
You could put a rubber tip on it like some movie.
Okay, can I ask you, can you shoot a 22 from a water tower?
Well sure, why not?
In this situation.
Listen, my training is so extensive and I know Mike is just as capable.
You put me anywhere with any caliber and I can do it.
Okay.
Any caliber.
I told you something a long time ago.
You got a slingshot?
I got a slingshot?
I can do it with a slingshot.
Alright.
Remember, Carrie, a long time ago...
Remember you were talking about the Zen of shooting?
Yes.
I don't want to say any more.
The Zen of shooting?
There are some things we got to keep out of the public domain.
Remember?
I was telling you the secret of shooting.
I do.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And you said it's like Zen.
So I'm just reminding you that you know What I want to say, but I can't say.
Hey, I studied Zen in Japan, so I know probably what you're hinting at.
Oh, I have a sword thing that ties in with Zen, because I know Steven Seagal and Aikido and all that.
The sword and the mind are one.
Okay, that's just a saying.
But when you train with a sword, all you do is cut.
I don't know.
I just happen to have a wooden sword.
Okay.
I always practice the sword in my cutting.
That's all they do is cut and cut and cut.
And you might block and do some cuts.
That's what they do at the range all day long until you're tired of it, and then you go back and do it some more.
It's in your sleep.
You hit dead center, and I would teach people that want to know, how come you're such a good shot, John?
Because I try to shoot it dead center, and after that, you keep shooting through the same hole.
Here's just an idea of what a circle, 50 cent piece.
You shoot through the same hole, then they can't count the shots anymore.
They look for the misses all the time, but if you shoot... Very interesting.
Okay, yeah.
Right?
Okay, fair enough.
Now, we've been going for a while, so we don't need to keep going on this road, but, you know, of course, if anything occurs to you later, you text me, we'll put it out there and so on and so forth, and if we need to do another roundup of this, we can do it.
Now, I do want to get to the Cheadle.
Yeah.
Basically the Congress cross-examination of her and I actually want to understand what was her position that she would come to that meeting either ill-prepared or purposely ill-prepared and also trying to cover things up.
She was clearly doing a cover-up.
Do you know why and what would be her motivation?
Well, look at Mayorkas, who's the head of DHS.
They tried to do an impeachment, and they failed.
That's a big indicator right there.
That guy failed at the border.
I worked at the border, so I've got specific information about how things work.
And when they failed at getting him impeached, that's a serious thing.
Remember, DHS is above all the agencies now, so technically, Cheadle, the former Secret Service Director, had to report to Mayorkas, so therefore, she's in fear of her job she's going to protect.
She was also appointed as far back as, I believe, Clinton, so she may be a Democrat appointee.
Those people are in the same boat.
They're going to lie, cheat, and steal.
I watched the very same congressional hearings.
I watched the very same questions.
I love Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Josh Hawley's excellent, too.
These guys really get into it, and I am in touch with their offices.
I've already offered myself to testify on anything that they want to ask me, and I'll break it down more than they even imagine occurs.
Every question that they asked Cheadle, and I watched for signs of deception, and she got nervous.
She did become evasive.
She didn't answer questions where she could have said, this is what I know, but instead of saying, this is what we know now, she's turning over to, well, the FBI is a lead agency.
They're doing the reports.
We have to wait till the reports come through, and she's the head of the Secret Service?
My God, they're the epitome of the best people in the world, and yet she's acting like, no, we have to let it go back to the guys at the DOJ.
Yeah, they're the experts on the scene as well.
Yes, yes, that is their job.
The FBI does not do protection, basically.
Okay, one more question, and then Mike, I want you to respond.
What about the idea that Trump and the White House had their own guys Well, yeah, you can.
It's hard.
I'll give you an example.
Did you see evidence of some people that are actually, can you tell a secret service agent from another kind of agent, like just by looking at them or anything?
Well, it's, yeah, you can.
It's hard.
I'll give you an example.
We are right now during the campaign season.
When I was back at the White House, I ran into guys who were protecting other people, even the vice president at the time, I think.
I think it was Nelson Rockefeller.
And they had a guy that had long hair, and he was kind of not kept for our standards.
So I engaged him purposely.
Oh, hey, what agency are you with?
Oh, he was IRS.
He's an IRS investigator.
Well, how'd you get picked for this detail?
You know, like a negative kind of a tone, right?
Oh, how did you get that detail?
Oh, I got picked and blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Now, if you had asked for that female Secret Service agent, Grady, In Denver, Colorado, if you remember the one Grady, she absolutely refused to go protect Trump.
That's a violation of her requirements right there.
If I was a director or the agent in charge, I would have told her, Grady, Report to the agent in charge, turn in your badge and your gun, and you're finished.
That's it.
You cannot refuse to protect the President of the United States when that is the main function.
That's like a no-brainer, yeah.
Exactly, exactly.
But there are people with a background like me that I can go over.
What I'm asking you, though, is if you look in general and you think about everything you know, could you identify individuals that were even close who ran up because maybe it wasn't just the Secret Service?
Any idea about that?
I mean, what about these guys?
Can you identify them?
The short female was left-handed and she was fumbling with her gun and holster.
Right, I remember that, yeah.
Remember, they change the guns into holsters.
They don't use leather holsters all the time like they used to.
It's a semi-automatic.
It could be a P-20, 226, or P-26, or whatever.
It doesn't matter.
She had it on her left side.
She's a little overweight.
She's got a vest on, but she's busy looking, and she's missing her holster, which means all she has to do is look and get it in there, but she's having a problem.
Once you pull your weapon, you keep it out until the threat goes away.
There was no assurance that the threat had left.
I would have kept it out looking around.
On another video that I just saw yesterday, the same female agent shows up after the SWAT team guys or the counter-sniper team guys showed up at the hospital where Trump was being taken to.
She gets out.
Remember, SWAT guys walk around with open shoulder weapons.
They've already got their weapons out.
If you go to the scene of a location where the weapons are out, you better get yours out too.
And I've learned that from the first couple of days when I was in Secret Service night shift.
If the other guy pulls his gun, you pull your gun out too.
Something's going on.
So that's just one indicator on one person.
What about the people in this picture?
Are these all Secret Service, would you say, or do you know?
I don't know.
To be honest, they look like they could be.
They act like they know what they're doing.
They're very aggressive about their job.
I would have to say most of them are.
Let me ask you again.
How is it that they had left the man exposed seconds after the shot?
Well, they left him exposed technically on the stage from the beginning, which is bad.
Well, we've discussed that.
We've discussed that.
But after the shot, he's still exposed.
How does that happen?
Right.
They covered him over.
They're checking him for wounds.
They're getting him ready to escort him off, then they have to cover him up like a human shield.
One guy was actually putting his hand over the head like he's going to cover his head.
He technically should have had another, like a bomb blanket or a Kevlar blanket to cover him, which they didn't have.
They do have special Kevlar briefcase material.
That they carry around.
Why wouldn't they?
Why wouldn't they have taken?
I would think they would take him down and keep him down and clear the clear the area.
That would take too much time.
He's wounded.
He's bleeding.
If he's wounded, he's bleeding, bleeding, breathing and heart.
Top three EMT type stuff to worry about.
He's bleeding from the top.
They don't know if he's been hit somewhere else.
They need to get him out of there into the vehicle into the hospital as soon as possible.
They can't wait for the crowd.
So it's a priority thing.
That's the main priority.
Get him out of there first.
Mess with the crowd later.
Let the other officials mess with that.
Okay, so who chose to have the woman who is not as tall as him protecting him?
That's a good question, Carrie, because I would not have chosen a short person that's less than six foot three.
Six foot three is his basic height.
You need all tall agents.
Big, wide-shouldered guys or women to cover that body.
If they get a person short, that's a screw-up.
You know why?
Because they go back to the 70s and 60s.
EEO.
We need a female.
We need a black.
We need a Hispanic.
Even so, okay, but let me ask you one other thing.
She is, not only is she short, but she's bent over as if she's carrying him.
Why is she carrying him when she's smaller than him?
No, she's not totally carrying him.
The other agents are holding him up.
She's trying to, though.
Right.
Remember, she's got the hat.
She's got the hat in her hand.
She's still there.
She's still there.
It doesn't make any sense, this picture.
I'm just saying.
I know.
The picture's limited in what we see right now.
Can I add something about a military perspective?
I've never been that impressed with the Secret Service style of wearing the business suit and everything.
I'm saying, who are you fooling?
You know he's a target.
So I would have people around the President in black or gray, and I would have shields.
We actually have shields now.
And their purpose is only to block the line of sight of shooter, and then if something happens, they do what we call in the old time warfare, the phalanx, where you can actually link shields and make a human tank out of multiple shields.
I don't see any of this conscious understanding of the military threat That is against the President of the United States.
You need to stop thinking like law enforcement.
Think military.
And in a military setting, I'm seeing body, soft, needs to stop rifle caliber bullets.
I need a hard Kevlar shield to do that.
So I'd have some people already there to block the line of sight.
Like the patrolman and JFK, the motorcycle guys are supposed to be there to thwart the line of sight in the first place.
I would have already had guys already around Trump naturally while he's giving his speech.
Well, that's a good point.
And then converge.
Go ahead, John.
That's what I would have done.
Yeah, good point.
That's a good point, because we have to concentrate on the Spartan symbol for the phalanx that they use on a lot of the shields.
Now, I was trying to indicate that earlier.
They are supposed to have Kevlar vests on.
If all of them have vests, that's what they need to surround him with in addition to his own vest and body armor.
That means he's doubly, triply protected by their vests as well, which I didn't want to necessarily let out.
So technically, he's got his own vests on.
They've got vests on.
That's where they need to get up and do the body huddle, group hug, or whatever you want to call it.
And they could get him out that way without openly pulling up a shield of some sort or a briefcase.
Now in Japan, their Secret Service guys have a briefcase.
I'm trying to reach for one.
I don't have one immediately available.
But it's a briefcase and it's all black.
It's very thin.
It looks like a briefcase.
It's a Kevlar shield.
That's what they're doing.
They're carrying around a briefcase.
This is like, to me, this is just like no-brainer.
Now, why?
Yeah.
Okay, this is another thing that I'm thinking.
Okay, so the White Hats very likely, you know, they're using AI now, they're looking in the future, they're having remote viewers, they're doing all that.
They seem to have been notified somehow, some way, that there was going to be an incident, okay?
That's my guess.
I think that Trump, and you're saying it really is Trump, I think he was trained ahead of time that if he ever got hit, and he wasn't obviously killed, incapacitated at that moment, that he would rise up and do the fist.
I believe he was trained to do that, okay?
Well, I'm just saying.
This is theatrics.
It's theatrics.
I believe it's training.
So regardless, okay?
What I'm trying to say is that if you have a guy who has, and he's had attempts on his life, I know for a fact, other attempts on his life, okay?
Many, many.
Yes, and so what we're talking about here is a man who is a target, who is even in this time span, even Biden Made him a target, right?
By speaking out, saying he shouldn't cross out.
You mentioned something about putting him in the cross.
And you didn't, you didn't go take him, you didn't go to a rally with the proper setup to even shield him, right?
After the initial shot.
Well, taking into account the weather, it's hot.
Muggy, just like the weather's pretty bad, but they didn't have the proper equipment that they should have had.
In my opinion, you make me the Secret Service Director, I'll make some serious changes.
That means you're going to have agents with that briefcase with Kevlar around, besides the Kevlar vests.
And you can have two, minimum two, or four agents on the platform.
Maybe even a Lexan glass, bulletproof glass.
Some people said, yeah.
Just when they do that during the election time, when they swore the first president in at the White House, they put a review stage.
Remember the review stage at the White House?
It's Lexan, bulletproof glass.
It's like a plastic.
Same material that they have at the White House.
Same, similar material at the Oval Office, which is like six inches thick.
Right.
Therefore, you couldn't shoot an RPG and do anything.
Okay, well, why isn't that?
I mean, why are they risking a man's life?
They could.
It's like JFK back in 1963.
Do you think that Trump interfered with his own defense?
You know, his own... Well, no.
You know, I think what we need to do is get the names of everybody involved in the security detail that let this happen and then go do a rigged background check, see if secret societies, including the Cheeto at the top and Mallorca, see what secret societies they're including the Cheeto at the top and Mallorca, see what secret societies they're belonging to, And then look at their bank accounts and see if money has been shifted around.
John and I have talked about this, that the AGR building had Leos inside it, which means, hey, go ahead, Eric, go up there on the roof, do whatever you want to do, kid.
They need to be arrested, but everybody involved needs to be dragnetted and looked at to see for a guilty demeanor and bad faith misconduct.
And that will reveal something, especially if you put them under oath.
It's ineptitude, in my opinion.
I think it's complicity.
It has to be one or the other.
Purposeful.
I just don't like to think that all those agents are not doing their job.
I think some of the people have to be well-intentioned, that's all.
You mean good faith?
But I'm saying the people at the top and there were people at the bottom that were bad faith actors and they are complicit in this group ambush.
Can you believe that some of these Secret Service people are not on Trump's side and they are complicit?
Very easy.
If they're nihilist, hedonist, and Trump represents moral stoical turn for the country, that's going to infringe on their drugging and fornicating.
So there are a lot of people that hate Trump just because they're nihilist, hedonist, and they hate him bitterly because they think that he's going to gain control of the bully pulpit of the presidency and turn the country into a bunch of prudes.
Some of the people on the previous details actually were voluntarily working with Trump.
He did have some guys who were former agents that worked on his personal detail.
But I'm going to tell you, the difference between Kennedy and 63, when they used the bubble on the limo and they chose not to use the bubble, I've seen it.
That's a protective special material.
They're going to end up putting presidents on any of these stands with a special Lexan glass, which will cost a lot of money, but he'll be secure.
He could walk in like a fishbowl and then do the presentation, do all those stuff, but you're not going to be able to meet with the flesh.
That's the whole point, is his contact with the people out there in the field.
That's what they're going to end up stopping.
Well, this is what we're worried about, is that Trump is going to be attempted, assassinated again.
Alex Jones is warning people, and he's right, that Trump cannot afford to even shake hands with anybody because they could have fentanyl on their fingers.
But the other thing I want to say is, this is a question for John, if he goes to the sentencing hearing on September 18th, They could just throw... He doesn't leave the building.
He could go straight to jail and prison, and then the Secret Service will say, when he gets murdered, well, Epstein hanged himself.
Because I know when, one time, I was driving my car with out-of-state plates, and the cops nearby Fort Benning pulled me over, I went to pay a fine.
At that hearing, the judge said, you have the fine?
If you don't, you're going straight to jail.
So that's how they treated me.
These guys hate Trump.
I'm worried, John.
I'm asking from your experience, when you go to a sentencing hearing, How often is it that you don't leave the building, you go straight to start your sentence?
Because I'm worried that's what's going to happen, and that's how Trump's going to get killed.
It goes two different ways.
If you're politically up, look at the Peter Navarro case.
They waited until sentencing before he actually had to report in.
Look at Steve Bannon.
Look at some of these other guys.
And they have to report in.
They give them more leeway.
He's the friggin' former president of the United States.
Secret Service still has to stay with him, and under the executive protection and the orders that they have to go by, they could do like Hunter Biden did one day and walked out of Congress when Marjorie Taylor Greene was going to ask him questions.
He just got up and walked out, followed by Secret Service.
What are you going to do if you get up and walk out?
Are you going to attack the president with Secret Service?
Secret Service has a right to shoot badges I protected the President of the United States, and I shot weapons at the range, and we had targets that looked like agents.
Business suit, tie, white male, doesn't matter.
Holding a gun, we shoot it.
It's a target.
It's a threat.
Doesn't matter.
If they got uniforms with badges, we could shoot those too.
Yeah, it has to be like that.
They could do it on a Zoom call if they want to.
It's not gonna happen.
Okay.
I don't even want him to go to New York.
Yeah, I mean, there's all kinds of these kind of things.
Okay.
So, so if we bring it up, then that takes away their element of surprise.
That's why I brought it up.
All right, fair enough.
But thank you, you guys.
Great job.
Okay.
If Again, if there's anything amiss, if you left out something or you get something new, come to me, please, and then we'll do a show if we need to.
We'll do a 15 minutes if we need to.
Whatever you got, okay?
Just because this is an ongoing investigation, or should be, and let's see where this whole thing is going to lead, all right?
I'm going to ask you to send me your contact information so we can talk off camera or email because I lost it on my camera.
All right.
All right.
Yeah, happy to do that.
Yep.
Yeah.
Okay.
Thank you.
All right.
Thanks everyone.
If you look at the chat, you'll see a place where you can donate to keep John Carman In a safe situation, he's really hurting financially.
He's obviously an incredible professional.
We have to protect these people that have helped us and protected our leaders over the years, and so please do donate if you possibly can.
He's a very good man, as you can see, and he's lending his expertise to us here today.
Thank you.
Very good.
Okay, excellent.
Thank you, Mike.
Same thing with Mike.
Mike is a dedicated professional, really, soldier.
I mean, I don't know what you call yourself, Mike, but paratrooper, yeah?
Yeah, paratrooper.
Yeah.
All right.
Thanks, everyone, for watching.
Paratroop officer.
Paratroop officer, yes.
And defending our troops and making sure they're safe and they've got the right equipment, right?
That's what I work on usually.
Yeah.
Yeah.
All right.
Tangible gear.
Excellent.
Okay.
Thank you, you guys.
Take care.
Thanks everyone for watching.
All right.
Export Selection