All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 30, 2021 - Project Camelot
01:11:47
DAZ SMITH: REMOTE VIEWING CRYPTO & LA PALMA
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Thank you.
Hi, everyone. everyone.
I'm Carrie Cassidy from Project Camelot and very happy to be here today.
So I've got Daz Smith with me and I have interviewed Daz in the past.
So if you're interested, you can go on to my, I guess, my Odyssey channel and also my website and just search under his first name.
It would be the simplest D-A-Z and the interview should come up.
But Daz, welcome and it's lovely to have you here today.
Hi there.
Yeah, it's nice to see you again.
You too.
And so what I wanted to do is maybe set the sort of playing field because of how I sort of stumbled on the situation based on a video that Dick Allgaier made.
I don't know if you guys all made it together, however you do that, but you're a part of the team and you guys are currently Remote viewing cryptocurrencies, correct?
Yes, yeah.
That's our main, I guess, our main stable of work.
But also for the same patrons, subscribers, we also look at the news a month ahead and we do the occasional mysteries and other kinds of targets as well.
So it's a bit of a mixed read, but mainly cryptos.
Okay, so mixed bag.
And so basically what happened was, and I'm going to actually share my screen, and so bear with me here as I get this organized, but it's not always the simplest thing.
So let me see if I've got the right, actually, website picture here.
Okay, so while I do this, I've got to pull up the actual website, so just bear with me.
While I do that, why don't you introduce yourself just in terms of your background, okay, and say something about how you got into this whole field, etc.?
Yeah, no problem.
I've been a remote viewer now for going on 25 years.
I was first introduced to remote viewing at a UFO conference in 1992 and then decided from that point on that I'd try to find out about it and learn it.
Of course, that was pre-internet then, so it wasn't until 1995 really when the remote viewing projects became public and And people start going on the internet that I managed to get a teacher and train in it.
And I've been doing so ever since, really.
The last four years, I've been working with Dick Howgeier, Edward Riordian, and Niamh, and a few others now, in an operation called Crypto Viewing.
Where we have subscribers that essentially fund us to look at cryptocurrencies, gold markets, and the S&P 500, things like that.
But we also, on a monthly basis, look ahead a month at the global news, which is, you know, I guess what we're going to be talking about tonight, which was one of those.
And we occasionally do the occasional mysteries target for the people as well.
In terms of all of that, I'm going to scroll through my website here because I put out an article showing...
And if you go to my website, this is on the front page, obviously, and that's the banner.
So just click on the banner.
And basically, I actually featured one of your books, and you're on Amazon, so people can go there and also support you that way.
So what we had is a developing story, which, of course, is the eruption at La Palma.
And I was doing some investigation on that.
I don't actually remember how I stumbled on your cryptocurrency I'm going to scroll down to the actual first show.
So this was the show that you were supposedly, as I understand it, and you can certainly correct me here, you guys had all gotten together as normal to do the viewing of what was going to be September, and I'm assuming This was sometime in August.
And you just wanted to look at what were events in September, I think, was the target.
And then it was just sort of an amazing thing that you all came up with the exact same quasi mushroom cloud, whatever you want to call it.
And then Dick Allgaier and you guys put together this video.
I saw Dick's face.
Actually, I wasn't really paying attention to the background because the title didn't say anything about, you know, anything.
And, you know, so I didn't know that was a design or what.
And I didn't know who this guy was at first.
And then I thought, wait, I know that guy.
And I've interviewed him in the past and so that's when I actually paid attention.
I started to watch the video and I was amazed that you guys had actually remote viewed La Palma in theory.
And I want to talk about that because I want to talk about Are you convinced it's La Palma?
And I know that you normally do the kind of results would go on your Patreon.
And granted, this is a free show we're putting out.
So, you know, in whatever way you want to do to sort of, you know, still safeguard what is the unique experience that your paying viewers would have.
But still, I think this is a...
You know worldwide event it could affect a lot of people it's ongoing and that's part of the story so if you can talk about maybe that how did it develop that you guys saw the same thing that you were I thought you were planning to see cryptocurrency things things that might affect cryptocurrencies is that how you look at it or maybe you can explain all that.
So what we do each month is, for example, this week before the end of the month, so I've got two days, I will probably tomorrow sit down and do my remote viewing project where I will look at October's global news, and then I will try to record that in a remote viewing session, and my colleagues would all be doing the same.
And we do this on a month-by-month basis.
We've been doing this for four years now.
And although there's four or five of us doing the remote viewing, sometimes one or two of us does have an overlap where we both get data on a very similar thing that's happening.
But what was strange about this one was we all sat down for our Zoom meeting, five of us, to look at this, four remote viewers and a project manager.
And the project manager is someone I'm actually training in remote viewing as well, although they're not as part of crypto viewing as a remote viewer.
And we were just shooting the breeze and I said, I don't really want to go through the news this week because I had to do it twice because I just couldn't shake this massive mushroom cloud that I was getting.
And then everyone's face on screen just dropped in complete shock.
And all of them were like, oh my god, well, I had a mushroom cloud as well.
And they all had mushroom clouds.
And even the person, Dennis, who's doing the hosting for us, who does RV on the side, as I said, even he had a mushroom cloud in his RV session that he was doing just as a general practice run for himself.
So we were just really shocked at how strong the mushroom clouds came across in our imagery.
And it kind of started from there, really.
Right.
And so at that point, what exactly do you do?
Because you, okay, let's talk a little bit about the actual, you know, remote viewing when you do have a target and the way you, you know, I think yours is 20 pages long.
You were kind enough to send me your particular viewing.
I understand that.
There's maybe some things in there you don't want out there, and we can even talk about that.
But what I want to do is talk a little bit about process.
So does that mean that everyone has 20 pages of information that eventually you publish?
Do you publish it at the end of the month to your Patreon people?
Because we do it pretty much a couple of days before the month starts, as soon as the month starts, like I'll be doing mine, say, tomorrow for October's, and then within a day or so of October starting...
Our patrons will get to see a video of the news that we all do when we kind of read out our impressions live on Zoom, a bit like we're doing now.
but they'll also have a paper copy of everyone's remote viewing as well in advance so they can determine if if any of the predictions we come up with are of any use for them and it's not just uh you know like the la palma thing that came up i generally ask myself questions when i'm doing the rv for the month so what will the top global news be I sometimes ask what the top European news would be, and sometimes I ask what the top crypto news is going to be, because I know our patrons want to know that.
And I just ask other things as well.
Sometimes if it's all looking a bit grim, I will try to ask what the top positive news for the coming month is going to be.
And stuff like that.
So we all do it in our slightly different styles and ways.
But overall, you know, I would say each of us does about 10 to 15 separate news predictions each month.
So that's four of us doing it.
So there's probably 40 to 60 predictions of what's going to happen in the next month, which is a whole range of things from catastrophes to, you know, where the markets are going to go crypto or normal.
Okay, and can you give a percentage of accuracy?
Because I know you and Dick are...
I think you both used to work for Courtney Brown.
I don't know how you viewed that as contractors or whatever you viewed it as.
And then eventually you both left.
That's how I came across you initially.
Yes.
So what is your hit rate?
Because you're both, I think, world-renowned at this point.
Okay, on normal RV targets, which aren't looking at the future, because for those that don't know, we can look at the past, present, and future.
And across the board, all remote viewers, in any discipline, doing any kind of style, past and present targets, they're generally very accurate on if they're trained.
Less so on future.
So on normal, present, and past targets, I would say I don't have a set figure, but, you know, I'm very accurate, and I would say over 80% accurate, over 80% of the time.
Easy.
But I know that on my news predictions targets, based on me databasing the entire last year, not this year, but the year before 2020, I'm only 60% to 65% accurate on predictive targets.
Okay.
And sorry, that's my dog in the background.
She just decided to play.
So in terms of the other remote viewers in the team, don't you all have to have your averages have to be kind of close to have even teamed up type of thing?
I mean, we're all pretty accomplished, but I don't know if they, you know, it's left to us as individuals to database and look at our own results, so I don't know what theirs are.
I mean, I do know, you know, just from an ad hoc basis that month on month, we have, you know, we, social media, and talk about, over the period of a year, hundreds of hits for top global news events.
You know, we are...
Pretty accurate.
As I said, I'm 65% accurate.
So that's, you know, if I do 10 a month, six and a half every month are going to come true.
Okay.
So now I'm going to go to the next video.
I assume you can see the screen, right?
Yes, I can see it, yes.
And, you know, feel free to, you know, if you have my RV session up and you want to show bits, then feel free to do that as well.
Okay, great.
I do have it on hand, so we'll do that.
And this is your drawing just here in the corner, by the way, just for people who are watching it right now, and they see this picture here.
And no doubt, there was plenty of interesting things going on.
Also, this Evergrande situation is...
Is a sort of a moving target from what I understand in terms of the financial situation.
Yes, yes.
But what I want to do here is actually get your take on this.
So these are the mushroom clouds.
This is only three of them.
There was one other.
This is actually a photograph and showing how similar...
You know, imagery.
But maybe you could explain when you got this target.
You've got some quite, I mean, I can pull up your thing.
You've got some, you know, now that you're saying you're willing to have that shown.
You've got some quite striking sentences in there that you kind of say to yourself.
And I think that's fascinating in and of itself that you just do it that way.
But can you explain kind of your process in terms of this particular viewing?
Because it almost sounded like whatever you were seeing, you kind of had a different...
I don't know.
It was affecting you sort of in your viewing process because you made some comments to that effect.
Yeah, I did two on this one, and that's, in four years, it's the first time I've done two on a news event, because I started my first RV session on this, and I literally, in the moment I put the pen to paper, I just could not get this really strong feeling and imagery of a mushroom cloud out of my head.
And in the RV session, I tried to move on, tried to think about other things, but it just kept coming back.
So that, yeah, that bothered me because in RV I don't get, usually I don't get imagery, which sounds weird because it's called remote viewing.
It's more for me like internal, very subtle feelings.
I hardly get any flashes of imagery at all, but this was quite strong.
So I stopped it and I said I can't, you know, I've got to be what we call AOLing here, which is where your imagination comes into play.
And then I went back to it a couple of days later.
I thought if I give myself a couple of days rest, I might be able to get rid of it and then come back and get the proper news that I thought was going to happen.
But I came back to it two days later, and again, it just reappeared with the same stuff.
So, yeah, I just ended up trying to cope with it as best I could with my experience and recording the data.
Okay, so that's really interesting, the idea that you were able to actually have such clarity as to go back to remote view the same target a few days later because you felt that you were getting some kind of overlay.
And so you went back to view it, as you're saying, and I'm still looking for the thing.
And if you have it, you can also share your screen if you wanted to do it that way.
But you didn't prepare for this.
And we can put it on the page later also, because I'm sure you remember it.
And I remember it quite well.
In essence, you were writing comments and then you had to break away.
You wanted to be accurate.
You thought there was an emotional overlay.
You come back to it and then you resumed it and you got the same thing.
Would you say that?
Yes.
Yes.
Okay, so at that point you were writing, one of the comments you wrote that I thought was quite striking, well, there were two.
Now this, again, you could be 65% right or you could be, you know, whatever that, 35% wrong or whatever it is.
So what would you say you actually, when you made the comment, for example, This is associated with USA. Number one, you said that at one point and you said you're getting a USA feel from the story.
And then the other thing was that you said could be mass casualties.
And luckily, of course, La Palma at the moment is not in that state.
We're not getting mass casualties.
We're getting evacuations, but not casualties.
So any thoughts about those two impressions that you were getting and maybe commentary on what?
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, I'm always wary of my RV because when I'm looking at predictive stuff, because experience is showing me when looking at future events is the events, if I report a catastrophic style event in my RV... The event usually comes into play and it usually happens, but the magnitude of the real event is usually considerably less than I report in my remote viewing sessions.
It's almost like the process of trying it out on paper.
It inflates it, like an ego, it just over-inflates it a little bit too much.
And that's just from experience.
That's why I'm always wary when people get hold of some of the predictions in talking about them, because I know that they're usually slightly over-inflated on the paper, but that's hard for me to portray to people that are just reading the raw data.
So I think that's probably what happened in this case, but bearing in mind we've got two days left to the end of the month, so I don't like to say my predictions are over until the month has ended.
And also, you know, although I strictly stick all my stuff within the month that we did it...
Some of my colleagues like Dick believe that remote viewing doesn't take any time into account so that some of our events when we're looking at the future could happen a week or two or even longer sometimes after the event that we've looked at it because we're not constrained by time and remote viewing isn't stopped by the end of the month just because we say that's the target time.
So there is a possibility that something else could happen or this event could get worse over the coming days or some.
Absolutely.
So just for the viewers, the idea is also that, as you say, you're not constrained actually by time, but because we live in this world, People view this universe or sector as being sort of in a linear way.
Humans tend to look at this event and that event and that event in a very linear way, when in actually, in reality, Time is simultaneous, and therefore time in remote viewing is very hard to pin down.
So, but it's very interesting to me that, and yes, you know, there's no doubt that this is a developing story, but also, and I did find your viewing here, so I'm going to bring that on the screen as we talk.
But, and here is where you said USA, it says in Intrigued.
Sometimes I can't read your words.
Intimately linked, yeah.
Intimately linked here.
It has a flavor, feel, as you say.
And so, you know, this is where someone will say, well, what were you really talking about?
What was your sense there?
And there's a number of ways to go at that question, because in a certain sense, if, well, if there was a tsunami or if there was a threat of a tsunami, The idea is that it would go across the Atlantic and wash the shores of the Upper East Coast, or even down as low as Florida, so that it could impact the USA directly.
But it's a hypothetical, right?
Yes.
So we're still in that hypothetical land, and indeed, there are some people...
I actually put in my article that the USGS recently, I don't know how recently, decided to come forward and say that everything they said in the past was wrong about La Palma, that it wouldn't cause a tsunami that would go against the United States, wash up against the United States with ferocity and all that.
So they contradicted themselves.
But the USGS, in my view, because they downgraded their scale years ago, I believe that they are infiltrated by the government in certain ways and that they are controlled, tightly controlled.
And so that it was suspicious to me in and of itself that they came out with such a...
A statement.
And then I have actually on the page on my website, and I do encourage people to watch it, a short video that's all about an English guy who appears to be a very accurate, excellent scientist just by the description and the video.
And he completely contradicts what USGS is saying.
So he is saying, no, actually, they were right the first time.
This could have And recently, Cliff High came out with a video explaining how water doesn't do what they say it's going to do, and so-and-so, and that it might not have the impact that people think it could, or the threat that it could.
So we have all that.
I think the jury's still out on this kind of thing, because real volcanic monumental events such as the breaking off of a piece of an island and falling into the sea is only, you know, we have only so much experience in this era, you know, with it directly.
So, that's a long-winded sort of explanation as to how this statement you made, what were you thinking when you made that statement?
It's hard because remote viewing is very subtle.
And I can't be sure if I was having a USA kind of, as I said, flavour.
It just has a very subtle feeling to it.
And I can't be sure if that was because it looked like I was seeing what looked like a mushroom crab from a nuclear bomb type event.
And, you know, I instantly think of seeing films of them testing them in the deserts of America.
I can't be sure if that was just some kind of imagination thing that came in, say, in USA, or if it's real data.
The only thing for us as remote viewers that confirms this is when we get eventual feedback.
So I have to be honest on that.
I don't know what was happening there.
It just did have a USA-linked feeling to it.
Okay.
And, you know, what occurred to me, and, you know, I have been to Tenerife, and Tenerife is one of the Canary Islands.
It's very close to La Palma.
In fact, I think you can see La Palma from Tenerife, as I recall.
And I was just there a few years, a couple years ago.
So it's fairly fresh in my mind.
And, you know, it is not impossible that this is an If, okay, that this is happening and it's a triggered event, and then how might it be triggered?
Now, I know this is not the kind of, you know, speculation is not what you do, obviously, but it is to some degree what I do.
In other words, adding two and two and trying to come up with some kind of answer as to how these various disparate elements may come together.
And so when I'm looking at the situation, I'm thinking, okay, If there's an element of the United States that is triggering what we call weather wars and that this particular site could be used as a tool in a weather war,
Knowing that we're coming up against various crucial things in the United States and worldwide, even to do with the COVID thing, the fact that there's a huge backlash against the vaxes, that on top of it there's threats of food shortages and global Disarray to do with the financial system.
And I'm sure you could even speak to that because you must have been viewing some of these elements.
So I just want to throw that out to get people thinking.
I'm not really trying to say anything here definitive.
It's just the thought.
So that would relate again to the USA if there was some kind of element in which There was some hidden weather war piece to this that could be orchestrated by governments that have control of what we call weather weapons.
It's also very interesting to me, this whole thing that you guys seem to have concentrated on, and for this I'm going to actually try to bring your pictures up on the screen, your drawings and such, because I was struck by the fact that Correct me if I'm wrong, and maybe I didn't read it correctly.
This was a spectacular, impressive drawing.
It does look a little like a volcano, but you didn't seem to use the word volcano, and you also didn't seem to see fire.
Now tell me, did you see that, or did I miss it?
No, I didn't see volcano or fire.
It more felt to me, from my RV session, like an atomic or a bomb blast.
I felt the explosive nature.
I remember picking up that quite a few times, and like there, it's talking about the cyclic energy and stuff.
So I remember seeing stuff like that.
But yeah, nothing that would have indicated to me, if I'm completely honest, a natural event.
It felt like a man-made event.
Okay, and so then a person would have to say, you know, if you're looking at future events and you're viewing September, and the most obvious thing to grab hold of is certainly the La Palma event.
And as we see on that video that I showed just a minute ago on the surf, there was a photograph that shows kind of the mushroom cloud configuration.
But then I was asking you, At least in writing, saying, well, are we sure this is La Palma?
And is there any, did any of the other viewers, I don't know if you're able to say this or you know it, but did the other viewers get one the volcano and two fire?
I can't remember off the top of my head because it was a couple of weeks ago.
I'm just trying to think.
I'm not sure, to be honest.
We do so much work, I can't remember what they got.
I don't remember fire or volcanoes being the words.
It was just more along great expansive energy, explosion and mushroom cloud.
Okay, so there's...
Now, we don't know what the future holds, and we also...
You're not constrained, again, by the fact that we only have two or three days left in this month.
But if one was to extrapolate from that, then you could say that there is a remote possibility, number one, that this viewing and all your viewings were not of La Palma specifically.
I know it's a stretch, but it's possible.
We have a big earth here and all kinds of things go on.
And that whatever you did see didn't happen yet, or it had already happened and it triggered La Palma.
You see where I'm going with that?
Yes.
So this is speculation.
I know, you know.
Yeah, absolutely.
Either of those options I have to concede and be aware of.
Even if at the end of, you know, two days' time, I'm looking at feedback, and I will probably then, if nothing else happens, say, okay, looks like we were, or looks like I was describing a palmer.
There's something, there's more than enough in my data that I could go to on certain pages that indicates to me that I was probably picking up on a different type of a then, unless I was building that in my own mind, imagination-wise, but I tend not to do that too much.
Yeah, so I have to concede there may be the possibility that I might have been picking up on a future event of a magnitude of something like the 911 event that just attracted us as remote viewers to a point sometime in the future.
Okay, and one thing that is striking about this, again, is kind of some of your comments to yourself, because you go, you know, like, what the blank is.
Yeah, I also picked up on an assassination.
But, you know, we have also had a political assassination attempt this month as well, so I might have been picking up on that.
Okay, when you say a political assassination attempt, what are you talking about?
In the RV session there, it talks about an assassination attempt, and I think there was one in Ukraine or something a few days back that hit the news.
So I could have been picking up on that, or again, you know, it could be something a bit more, because I was also in the same RV session here, picking up this one you're talking to now, where I felt that there was a country or something on the brink of war with tanks being involved as well.
And, you know, having an assassination tank and some kind of, almost like an atomic bomb explosion, all in one RV session, makes it less and less like the La Palma event, to be honest.
Right.
That's what I thought.
Now, a call to arms, a warning, a global...
What does that say, global?
Global reach and global impact...
Right.
That's what worries me about the RV session is either I was producing an over magnitude, you know, so in the RV it was way more than actually happened, or that it might be a different event sometime in the future because...
The data I was getting seemed to talk about a global effect that would happen from this event that would be really bad and it would go on for decades.
And I'm not sure that would happen from what I've seen of the volcano so far.
I'm not sure that would affect global economic markets and political markets and stuff like that.
Okay, now this is kind of interesting to me because it's a downward trend.
Yes.
And one would see the volcano as spelling coming from the earth up.
So then this kind of does lend itself to the idea that something might have been shot into the volcano to cause the initial mushroom cloud.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that the so-called mushroom cloud that was put on the photograph was one of the early parts of the actual...
volcanism that happened on the island.
In other words, since then, what we've really seen, and I'll bring, actually, I'm going to bring this photograph up here, because it's a little, can you see that?
So this is actually from today.
And so, you know, incredible energy, fire in the sky, you know, that sort of thing.
Now, the reason I also am emphasizing this is because I have actually been following you guys and Courtney and his team, the various people that are working with him, for many years.
I mean, it could even be as many as 10 years.
And I myself do remote viewing, not very often.
I don't, I'm not that disciplined.
So I tend to do, I'm more psychic, intuitive, and I get, you know, stuff like that.
But I don't, I don't, you know, I find I sort of rebel against the discipline of remote viewing, but I realize it works and it's valuable and it's worked for me.
I've gotten some amazing, you know, hits, if you want to call it that.
Yep.
So, so, so because of that, when I see this and when I've been watching La Palma, because I'm also very interested in earth changes and that sort of thing.
And.
And I was struck by the fact that in the past when you guys have remote viewed a volcanic, you know, eruption, which La Palma absolutely is, you always mention the volcano.
You always mention fire.
And so this was quite distinctive in that you didn't mention either one, at least in your viewing.
At least that I could see.
And then I thought, how would you even leave that out if this really was La Palma?
So I'm not saying yes or no.
I'm just saying I just wanted to throw these things out, maybe get your thoughts on it.
But I do think it's quite interesting that we have sort of...
You guys are very accurate, and yet, you know, this is the kind of thing, you know, you've got a downward motion here.
You even say downwards, you know.
Yeah, yeah, that area there, when I asked the question, what caused this?
It looked like something that came down from above and exploded.
Right.
And so now that, see, because also another thing that I've noticed that when you do a remote viewing is sometimes you'll do a remote viewing where you do it in a certain time.
So it's a certain time span.
And what happens after that time within the viewing, you don't report unless you do a later time where you go, okay, let's look at this five hours later or let's look at this five days later or that kind of thing.
I take it...
Now, tell me again if I'm wrong.
You didn't actually do that thing where you progressed it.
Is that right?
No, because it's just like our normal news event and we all work independently and alone.
Right.
You know, as I said, I thought I was completely off target.
I was speaking to the guys before the recording and I was like...
I was like, you know, I don't even know if I should even go on camera this week because my news is so bad, all I had was a mushroom cloud.
And that, you know, that literally sparked everyone else off because they were like, whoa, that's all we got!
It was just totally out there.
But I have to be honest, it's not totally out there for us, this kind of event, when we at Crypto Viewing are trying to look at future targets.
One of our subscribers brought this up to me today.
They said, have a look at something you did in 2019.
And I'm literally just looking at the RV session now.
And again, it was a future target.
But the future target was a baseball game or something in America that was meant to happen in 2019.
And all I myself and the other viewers got was a cataclysmic event.
And, you know, in the one the subscriber told me to look at, I'm looking at it now, and it's talking about a tsunami wave that's crashing over the city.
And we're talking about America here, so it's submerging the city now.
I'm talking about fissures under the ground, the Mariana Trench, the trench, you know, all kinds of weird stuff.
So we have, in past events, when looking at the future, especially the future of America, come up with very similar events.
Okay.
Now, this is another image that I was struck by, because it was the idea that there were tall buildings, you know, a city kind of below.
Now, there is a city, you know, this is happening on a mountaintop above a city, And I could be wrong about this as well.
I didn't zoom in and try to see how many tall buildings were in the...
But just the drawing itself lent it to seemingly not being...
Another mention is there's no island.
You didn't mention an island.
Correct.
And you also don't mention even the tsunami wave idea.
So all of these things kind of lend themselves to saying, well...
Now, but it is interesting your reaction to getting, you know, the mushroom cloud kind of through you and that, you know, that in itself could have limited your view, you know what I mean?
You were kind of shocked by that or whatever you want to call it.
And then you went away, came back, got the same thing.
But it could have been you limiting yourself.
So we don't know, you know, just simply because it was a shocking thing.
And that's super clear in your comments to yourself here.
Yeah.
In, you know, in 24 years of doing RV and in four years of doing the news, I myself or the others have never all had mushroom clouds in any of our RV sessions.
And so that is remarkable.
I mean, that's what caught my interest, okay?
Right away I thought, oh my God, you know, four of these guys, completely without any idea, all of them got this, you know, in connection with September.
And so that's when I really, you know, started paying more and more attention.
And this is where we are now.
But, okay, so what I'm going to do here is, you know, I think we're...
We might be at the end of the viewing, yeah.
So, is there anything, like, you had a, once you had them, okay, so you have this meeting and you're on video, and it seemed like you actually were videotaping, the surprise was real, like, on the video.
It wasn't after you had talked about it, but you actually talked about it on the video.
Is that right?
Yeah, as soon as I said, I literally said to the guys, you know, there's five of us on Zoom, and I said, look, I don't know if I'm going to do my RV this week because, you know, it's rubbish because all I got was a mushroom cloud.
And, you know, all their faces were like, wow, that's all we got.
That was the moment when we said, right, quick, let's stick the video camera on now, let's start recording this because it sounds like we got something a bit strange here happening.
And we literally didn't talk about any of the other news that we picked up.
It was literally, you know, focused on this because this, even for us, it's a rare event, as I said, for the four viewers and even the project manager who's in training and not really a full-time remote viewer to also get, all five of us get mushroom clouds.
Yeah, it's very striking.
So, and you, how long have you been doing this just in terms, well, let's, first of all, how long have you been In this group, viewing the cryptocurrencies, because I have no idea how long have you guys been doing that?
Three and a half going on four years now.
All right, so a while.
And you actually, as a remote viewer, you've been involved in this discipline for how long would you say?
Nearly 25 years now.
Wow, yeah.
And DeGalgeier has a very long track record.
The other two I actually don't know, so, you know, that's why I don't mention them.
I don't really know their work.
Yeah, they're a bit newer, yeah.
Okay, so...
Okay, and even the, he's not called a handler, he's called a, what is he called?
The project manager and host.
Yeah, Dennis, yes.
Okay, so he even got this.
So that's extraordinary.
Now, in terms of, you know, because I know that, you know, we don't have to go into this much more.
What I did want to talk about was the idea of responsibility.
And even in reviewing the cryptocurrencies and the financial situation, there is a responsibility in the sense that, You can't just go out there, remote view, be as accurate as you guys are.
Because I think with accuracy comes more responsibility, right?
Yes.
And this is your career.
This is not just something you dabble in.
So again, there's an emphasis there.
And this is maybe true of everyone on your team.
In a sense, you're selling your work.
And that's perfectly within the bounds of understandable what people do to make a living, whatever.
My question is, when something comes along like this, where there is, could be, like you even said, one line was massive loss of life.
This is when you cross a line into the area of responsibility, and we were kind of batting that back and forth in text, and I posted your statement about that on my page.
But what I want to do is get sort of you to describe what kind of thoughts you guys have had, because you do have Patreon and you are charging money, So, are you prepared?
Do you make a preparation, being in this field as long as you have, for how you guys think about your level of responsibility to the public, should you come across something, you know?
And again, we don't know if these other guys, you know, you've got about a 20-page thing.
It doesn't say anything about water.
It doesn't say anything about fire.
It doesn't say, you know, volcano.
So it could be anywhere on the planet, and I don't know, you didn't seem to get any more specific than that.
Maybe even understandably because of the magnitude of what you thought you might be looking at.
But the other guys...
The question is, let's say, I'm just hypothetically, they got more.
Let's say they got more detail.
At that point, you've got a team together.
You've come together to remote view the future.
It's a very short-term future.
It's like the month of September.
Literally, at least you're trying to keep it within those bounds.
Yet, you could get a life-threatening event that could be global.
This has the potential to be that.
What do you guys say to each other?
What are your plans?
How do you deal with that?
It's very hard.
I mean, you know, we always put out public statements, especially for when we're doing the cryptos themselves.
You know, we tell people that we're not giving financial advice.
We're not financial advisors.
They should not, you know, never use any more money than they can afford.
And always, with any form of remote viewing, be it what we do or what anyone does remote viewing-wise, you should always use it with other sources of information.
Never take it for granted.
And, you know, we tell the people all the time, I think we did in the video, we tell people, you know, and I think I went over it, you know, I'm only 65% accurate when looking at the future.
You have to take that into consideration.
And my magnitude in the RV is always a lot more than the actual real physical events when I'm picking up catastrophes and terror attacks, that kind of thing.
So we do try to do that with a balanced mind.
But I have to be honest, we've looked at stuff in the past, like the session that I got here today, where sometimes we don't put some of the information out because the picture we pick up is too grim.
We don't know what to do with it because it's a bit too scant in where and how and when.
We just know some events are going to happen.
For example, all throughout 2019, we were being tasked to look at events in the USA in the future.
And I think it was like Macy's Parade in 2020 and stuff like that.
And I don't know why we were tasked with it, but we were tasked with doing it.
And all of us, to a T, all of us remote viewers, we didn't pick up anything.
We were like, well...
Our data doesn't show that there is no Macy's Day Parade.
There's not going to be one in 2008.
We're not getting any.
We're getting something else.
You know, we're describing, like, fields or something else.
No, I think it was desolation and stuff, but we weren't getting anything other than a Macy's Day Parade.
of course because of covid there wasn't a parade but we didn't know that at the time and there wasn't a specific target for a target event so we didn't know what to do with that information all we knew is the event wasn't going to happen we couldn't tell anyone any reason why i mean i guess if we'd have spent several weeks or months looking specifically at that um we might have been able to get more information it's just that from week to week uh to satisfy the needs of our our people
you know our subscribers who are paying our wages really um we don't get a chance to stay on a topic for long and focus on it you You know, they want us to move on and tell us what's happening in the next month, what's happening with the next crypto.
Which is one of the, I guess, bad things, because it would be good for us to concentrate a lot more on this.
As I said, like the session I got here from 2019, and I got pictures here looking into the future, where I've got like New York, or I've got the words New York, but I've got the coast of America and stuff, underwater.
But, you know, what to do with that kind of information, really, because unless we focused on it as a project, you know, with five or six remote viewers spending several dedicated weeks on it, we're not going to be able to fill and get, you know, a report of a time, an approximate time or approximate date, approximate what's happening, that kind of thing.
So this would be under the heading of, you know, Inactionable intelligence, if you use those terms.
And the military uses that, obviously.
The agencies use that.
So actionable intelligence is very, that's like a crucial distinction.
So what you're saying in a certain sense is that in viewing the future month, you're not really getting actionable intelligence necessarily.
Not enough detail for anyone to do anything about it, to take an action in theory.
Now, let's drill down into that a little bit more because, in a sense, your group is very focused on cryptos.
Because there can be plenty of people that watch this to hear, what do you have to say about cryptos?
You know, because even right now, there are some dire predictions.
The Chinese supposedly backed out of, I don't know, it was Bitcoin, I guess, or was it all cryptos, just Bitcoin?
And some people say it's a ploy, they've done it before, they're going to come back in, all this kind of stuff.
Can you address, first of all, in terms of cryptos, do you feel that you give actionable intelligence, regardless of the fact you have a disclaimer and all of that?
But would somebody watch you and say, oh, you know, I'm going to believe what Dad says.
He sees this thing going up.
I'm going to go buy.
That's on them.
That's their responsibility to believe you or not believe you.
You've got a disclaimer.
But do you feel that you are giving enough actionable intelligence in terms of the cryptos?
Absolutely.
I mean, we have figures to show it.
And, you know, literally two days ago, I had a comment someone put on Facebook saying how just by following us on CryptoViewing, we had increased their wealth by 10 times over a year.
And myself, I don't have much disposable income.
Whatever I have, I do put into cryptos.
And right now, over the last two years, my investment in cryptos is at 500%.
I mean, you can't get less than 1% in a bank.
Okay, so what do you mean by that?
Are you saying 500% positive?
Yeah, yeah.
I'm not going to say how much I've invested, but it's not a huge amount.
Let's say I had invested $10,000 or something.
As of today, at 500%, that $10,000 will be up at $60,000 right now.
In two years.
With that in mind, your group is not just focused on cryptos, it's also focused, you said, on what could happen during the month events, news events, right?
So, if you were to put the same parameters on the news events, do you feel you're getting actionable intelligence in terms of news events, or less so?
Because it's, I would say, like cryptos, because we're looking at the future, I would say, as I said, you know, all I can go from my stats, my stats show that looking at the future news, I'm 65% accurate.
So if I give 10 predictions a month, I usually do give something like 10 different things each month.
Six to six and a half of them are going to turn out to be correct month on month.
Okay, now, given that, okay, let's talk about September, and then let's actually talk about October, if there's anything you can say at all.
I haven't done it yet.
Oh, you haven't looked at October yet?
No, I'm due to do that tomorrow and turn it in tomorrow.
Oh, alright.
But it's going to be a hard one this month though.
Yeah, it's going to be really hard for us to do this month because the volcano La Palma thing is so big and it's so in every news channel that the moment I sit down to do my RV tomorrow, I think the thing that's just going to be going from my head even before I start is La Palma, what's going to happen and that.
So it's going to be very hard to try to get the imagination out of the way.
All right.
Okay, very interesting.
So, you're worried about what we call overlay, yeah?
Yes, yes.
So, in terms of, but let's go backwards then.
So, for September, are you able to tell us, like, what were your hits, you know, did you have, like...
I haven't scored that yet.
I literally do not score my RV until the month has ended.
It's a bit like a...
It's a bit like a religious...
Not religious, but it's a bit of a ritual of mine.
I try not to score it before it's happened.
Dick and the Ed are as scored as it proceeds.
But I like to say, no, when the month's ended, I will then go back and look at the new sources and mark how many were accurate.
So I haven't looked yet.
Well, then let's go back a month.
Let's go to August.
How are you doing in August?
I don't know.
To be honest, I do see many of these.
I can't even remember.
Let me see if I can get at what I did in August.
Okay.
Because we're doing, you know, I'm doing like four or five different RV sessions a week.
So it's like, you know, 20 a month at the moment.
And that's just for crypto viewing.
And I have other things I'm working for.
Even if you, you know, I guess just for the people who are listening, or maybe if not, you know, specifically in August, what's a big crypto hit that you got?
That made a difference in your financial, you know, in your own financial sort of well-being as opposed to, you know, is there any specific or that the group got, you know, because it's a whole...
It's hard to say because we do, we probably do four, we look at four or five different cryptos alone each month that are randomly assigned to us.
Bear in mind, there are 12,000 and growing cryptos out there now.
When we first started this, there were only four But yeah, so I take the...
I mean, going back a couple of years, one we did was called Cardano.
And I invested in that because when I started investing, it was less than 10 cents each.
As of today, they're at $2.23 each.
And I'm expecting them from, not just from RV research, but from...
The other research on the site that I'm looking at as well, looking at the stats and performance and people involved, I'm expecting that one to easily go over the next six to eight months to $5 and it's only at $2.30 at the moment.
Okay, yeah.
Somebody actually, I have to say, full disclosure here, somebody actually did tell me to invest in it.
I haven't figured out how to do that.
I know I sound dumb, but I actually have an account, you know, a Coinbase account.
Yeah, that's the easiest.
Yeah, I got various things.
One thing that somebody else is trying to get me into, and I have a tiny bit, you know, I have a little bit of Ethereum.
I did make money on Bitcoin, because people donated Bitcoin, and then I put in a small amount myself, and actually it went up like...
Yeah, 90% of my...
I mean, the others are different than me.
They have different opinions.
But 90% of my investment is in Bitcoin.
And I'm expecting...
Bitcoin today is at...
What's it now?
41 at a moment, as I speak.
It's all-time high with $62,000.
All the top experts are indicating that by February...
But it should be this year.
But by February, it should be up around about 100 grand...
Within five years, myself and quite a lot of people out there expecting each Bitcoin to be worth anything up to a million plus each.
Okay, now there are a few, I guess, naysayers, whatever you want to call it, who are actually sort of screaming at the top of their lungs in a way, saying there's going to be a huge financial crash, get out of everything.
I think, yeah, I think there's going to be a financial crash in the traditional markets, which will bring, and I'm, you know, I've been for six months, I've been waiting for it to happen.
And I think it will drag cryptos down for a very short period.
but I think cryptos will then rapidly increase again faster than the traditional markets and stronger than before.
And of course, with cryptos, as they say, it's always the best time to buy is always on the dip.
So I'm hoping and waiting for the crash to happen and even for cryptos to crash a bit.
I know I'll lose value in my portfolio but then it will be a big buy signal for me to buy it when it's hit rock bottom and I'll massively increase my wealth then on it.
Okay, fair enough.
Yeah, it's coming soon.
Absolutely, it's coming soon.
But I don't think cryptos are going anywhere.
It's now nearly a $2.5 trillion market in several years.
You look at the chart of Bitcoin over 10 years, and it's gone up from nothing to, you know, at its peak, $62,000 and beyond.
You know, it's finite.
You know, there's only around about 19 million of them available for the entire world, and there will never be any more of them.
So...
Yes, it literally is digital gold.
And you just have to look at all the research.
All the big financial institutions, they're buying up Bitcoin like crazy.
You know, there's more demand for Bitcoin than there is Bitcoin out there.
Okay.
Very interesting.
What about XRP? Because I hear a lot about that.
They've had problems with the SEC, which are still ongoing.
So I don't know on that one.
I did buy a small amount of it many years ago when it was looking favourable because it looked like it was the one that was going to work with all the banks.
I think time's probably up for that one.
I'm not sure if that's ever going to go anywhere now, to be honest.
I think everything has moved on in such a degree the last year that they're a bit left behind now.
Now, when you're talking right now, you're sort of talking, it sounds like, as a combination, as a remote viewer, if I'd have looked at it, but at the same time as someone who did research.
Yes.
So, in terms of, you know, I don't know whether you want to do this or not, and I don't know if I need, you know, I have a disclaimer at the end of my show and all that kind of thing, but...
Do you want to say anything for the people that are watching of anything that you guys have looked at recently that you think is going up?
I mean, you mentioned Cardano, but is there anything else that you are reporting on?
That you can share with our audience that's already gone out to your, you know, subscribers when they got the first, you know, word on it.
I'm just trying to think, yeah, because you have to bear in mind as well that we all have different opinions on it as well.
Right.
And usually I'm quite a naysayer on quite a lot of them.
All right.
Some of them just don't feel right to me.
Well, you can even say what others in your group are saying.
I mean, you don't have to say necessarily your own.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, they've all been investing, well, some of them and some of my colleagues have all been investing in a crypto that's done really well last month called Solana.
Solana.
Yeah, that's done really well.
Yeah, but you know, for me...
No, to be honest, I'm a lazy investor in that if I can't buy it really fast with one click on Coinbase, and you can't do that with Solana, but some of the others we look at are so out there and you have to put money on nine different exchanges and transfer and it takes like three hours to do.
If I have to do that, Even though I know I can make 10 times the money I'm investing, or it looks like I could, I tend not to do it because it's too complicated for me.
Yeah.
Well, I'm certainly like that.
Yeah, so I'm a Bitcoin, Cardano and Ethereum person.
I mean, I didn't like Ethereum when, you know, our guys were all very bullish on Ethereum for years.
And I looked at it with RV and I was like, well, it just looks a bit boring to me.
And so literally, I only put a few hundred pounds into it just for a bit of fun one day.
But literally, the money I've put in that over six months has tripled.
And now I'm kicking myself thinking, oh, damn, if I put a load more money in that.
But I still think even that one's got a huge way to go.
So yeah, for me, I would say Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, Solana, all the what they call the DeFi or decentralized finance coins like Uniswap, Polygon.
They're all rising.
They're all going lots of places.
But we're talking one to five years on this.
Because with crypto at the moment, I feel, and I tell this to all our subscribers as well, Because I was in on the beginning of how the internet was built and developed way back in the late 90s to early 2000s, I see a very similar situation.
When I was getting into the internet in 1998, 1999, you used to read stories everywhere where people were going, oh, it's just a fad.
It's just things that people with computers are doing.
It's never going to take off.
It's never going anywhere.
That's what they're saying about crypto now.
So even if people can get into it now with tiny bits of money, and you can buy Bitcoin for a dollar a time if that's all you've got.
But if you get into it now, you're still ahead of the curve like we were with the internet in five to ten years' time.
That's when it's going to get big.
Right.
I think that's true.
I have to say, just on a psychic level, I don't know why, but Ethereum caught my eye.
So I did actually put a little money.
I have nothing, but, you know, what you call disposable.
I was so little.
I did put some on there because I had a psychic feeling about it.
It took the longest time to go anywhere.
It just stayed flat for a really long time.
So I thought, oh, well, I guess I was really, you know, maybe I shouldn't.
It's going now.
Now it's finally moving.
So I was really, really happy about that.
I think it's nearly at $3,000 today and there are people out there that know what we're talking about.
You know, I don't.
I listen to other people on most of the vice of this and have my intuition, of course.
But, you know, I think because Ethereum is what we call the building blocks for 90% of all the other ones out there, all the other 12,000, I don't think it's going anywhere and I think it's got lots of room to grow on that and maybe even double.
That could go to $5,000, $6,000 over the next two, three years.
Right.
And again, you can't get investment opportunities like that anywhere else.
You can't get that from a bank or anywhere.
Right.
Okay, so now, you know, I'm not going to keep you too much longer, and you've been very generous with your answers as well as your time.
But what I want to ask you is, because we're on the verge of October, and I know that you haven't looked at October, okay?
So let's, you know, say that.
But knowing that you haven't looked at October...
And, you know, just tell me in terms of, do you get, like, you know, because we've talked about this even off the record, like, you are still have some psychic abilities.
You have intuition that does pay off, you know, in various ways and has when you're a younger child and so on and so forth.
So when, because October is supposed to be such a groundbreaking month, like, have you heard that?
I certainly, I'm hearing that everywhere.
Dan, is that going to impact when you do your viewing, or is that already impacting your brain when you're looking at it, or what?
I mean, yeah, that's the problem with being a remote viewer.
If you know what you're looking at and stuff, you do have to try to put it aside, and only experience allows you to do that.
I am.
I have to be honest, I'm a little bit worried that this month's going to go completely bad.
And, you know, it may get to the case...
I don't know how the others are going to do it as well.
I'm meeting them later, so I'll find out.
But it may be a case that because we're so scared that all we're going to pick up is our imagination about, you know, what's happened this month with the volcano and stuff, that we purposely block out any information about anything that might happen with a volcano because, you know, we're just thinking it's imagination.
Um...
I don't know.
It's very hard doing this kind of work that we're doing because not a lot of people have...
Well, no one's done a project that's gone on for three and a half years looking month on month at the future.
So we are testing new ground with it, really, and it's a...
It's all very experimental.
But yeah, it's going to be hard knowing that I have to sit down tomorrow and look at the news that's going to happen literally a couple of days after that onwards and try not to let my imagination come into play and build what we call build castles, build things that aren't real.
Based on what I've seen this last month with the mushroom cloud, and my feeling is about if it really was the volcano, or if it is maybe a future event which is a bit more devastating globally.
So yeah, it's hard.
That's all I can say on it.
It's hard.
I just wanted people, that's part of the reason I brought you on the show, was to kind of give some depth and background to what you guys came out with, so that there would be some deeper understanding of the process you're going through.
You know, the ins and outs and the facts of what you saw and what you didn't see and maybe what it could mean and what it might not mean and all this.
And then the responsibility that's behind it because I think that's maybe the biggest question I would think in people's minds would be, you know, wow, you're seeing this, you're seeing things.
Do you warn anybody ever?
And that might be the last good question to ask you.
Have you warned?
We do.
I mean, we don't put out, like, public, you know, statements.
Well, I'm talking about governments or, you know, behind the scenes.
Yeah, no, we don't do anything like that.
Literally, but, you know, anyone that's a subscriber to us, they get everything.
So they get to see everything, and then they talk about it and they spread it.
We are, we have been told by people that are working with the government, remote viewers that work with the government, that there are agencies that do look at our work and make decisions based on some of our work.
Because, you know, we have come up with some quite interesting predictions and work and stuff.
So, yeah, we've been told that that happens, but we don't know, you know, we don't know for certain.
Yeah, sure.
Yeah, but we don't put out public statements, you know, because, you know, I, for example, being an avid researcher of remote viewing, I know from my research and the work I've done on missing persons cases, and I've done 250 of those for the American police forces,
that a great hindrance to the police forces across the globe, you know, I'm talking about America now mainly, are when they have a famous case that is reported really well in the press, And they get hundreds of people that claim to be psychics giving them tips.
And of course, because they're police, even though they think that a lot of these people are inaccurate and maybe a bit crazy and, you know, whatever, because it's intelligence, they literally have to follow those tips up.
And 99.9% of them are complete rubbish and time wasters.
So we don't want to go down that route and interrupting...
Yeah, we've got the softy approach.
If you're a subscriber, the information's there for you.
If you're not, then I don't know where to go from that, really.
I don't want to put out all the stuff I don't know.
As a subscriber, does that give you some kind of legal protection that you wouldn't have, for example, if you didn't have subscribers?
I'm not sure if it does.
I know the company that we're all working under has lawyers and we put out our disclaimers and stuff.
And we try to tell everyone, remote viewing, no one's 100% accurate.
It's not accurate all the time.
And as I said, my predictive stuff is...
Nowhere near as accurate as my, you know, my PowerSpace stuff.
For example, us as Cryptovium, we've just done a project for Dick Algar, an internal project, looking at, and the feedback was a picture of a grey alien with a bullet wound in its head or something.
And we all come up with absolutely amazing data on that.
I do scratches inside the body of this thing, how it died, you know, its internal organs and everything.
And we're really accurate on that kind of stuff because it's past.
Whereas the future, because it hasn't collapsed into a single scenario yet, we're just not as accurate on.
That's why I'm a bit wary about how I present future-based information, knowing I'm only 65% accurate.
Okay, very interesting.
Do you know what Dick Allgaier considers himself in terms of future, what his percentage is?
I don't know what his percentage is, but I... Based on all my work that I've done with looking at other people, like the people that are playing with a technical, what we call ARV, where you're trying to win money, you know, with outcomes of sports and bettings, all that kind of stuff.
The average, really, across the board, across tens of thousands of remote viewers, is around about 60% to 70% accurate when looking at anything to do with future-based work.
Okay, interesting.
And the thing is, as well, it's got these variables, whereas the longer you do it and the more bored you get doing it as well, over time that accuracy drops to something just over chance, so something like 55%.
So if you get bored in doing it, over time your accuracy can drop to little more than just flipping a coin, really.
Okay, very interesting.
Okay, well, in light of the fact that we're in this COVID situation, I know I'm not supposed to...
I said I wouldn't ask you another question, but I have to say...
Go ahead, it's okay.
We haven't said anything about COVID, really.
So a lot of people might have wanted you guys to look at, I guess, the progress of, you know, whether people are going to start kicking down their doors and forcing them to have vaccines.
Have you had that as a target yet?
No, we haven't.
The only COVID target we had was in, and I put out a video on my YouTube channel last week about this.
Okay.
It was in 2019 when it just started in China and our tasker got us to look at the origin of it.
And all of us as remote viewers talked in great detail about how this was a virus that escaped.
It was man-made and it escaped from a laboratory.
Okay.
That's the only COVID thing we did.
And there's a video of that up on my YouTube channel.
Great.
I'm sure people can go there.
So your YouTube channel, is it called Dad Smith or what is it called?
It's on YouTube and it's just, you can search for Dad Smith or Remote Viewed.
The channel's called, you know, YouTube forward slash Remote Viewed.
Okay.
Remote Viewed.
Okay.
Very good.
All right.
And for people that want to subscribe to your Patreon, how do they find that?
Yeah, so I think...
Bear with me a second on that.
I haven't got the address for that, but I'm sure it's just patreon.com forward slash crypto viewing.
Okay.
Fine.
Okay, that's probably...
And I'll get it and put it on the page as well.
Yeah, yeah.
And, you know, if you're on Facebook at all as well, all the hits we'd have on a weekly basis, because we have social media people that work for us, Uh, they put all the hits and most of the data and reports, uh, for free on, on Facebook.
If you just, you know, if you just say you like the crypto viewing page or whatever it is, yeah.
Okay.
Is your organization called crypto viewing or?
Yes.
Crypto viewing.
Yes.
Okay.
All right.
Great.
All right.
Thank you so much for being on the show and thanks for your insights and for being here and doing your service to humanity as well.
And let's see what you see in October.
I think a lot of people are going to be very interested in that.
If I see anything bad, I'll let you know.
Okay.
Thank you.
All right.
Take care and thanks again for being on the show.
Yeah, nice speaking to you again.
All right.
You take care.
▲
Export Selection