All Episodes
Previous Next
Aug. 14, 2016 - Project Camelot
01:23:59
KERRY LIVE AT BASES CONFERENCE WITH PETER PAGET
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I'll give you a microphone now.
I'm going to empower Peter Padgett, the power of voice communication across the Atlantic Ocean and everywhere else.
This is Kerry Cassidy from Project Camelot.
I'm about to go live with Miles Johnston and Peter Padgett at the BASIS conference.
This is going to be a somewhat experimental situation, so bear with us.
And we're going to be trying to connect everyone and show everyone what's happening.
So let's see if this works.
Okay, Kerry Cassidy, welcome to the BASIS Project Conference.
We're in record here.
We have Peter Padgett, who has his...
We'll see how that's going to work.
And are we gating our noise?
Let's get our communications established.
Is the level you're receiving from me good enough?
Yes.
Too loud or too quiet?
It's great at the moment.
It sounds great.
Okay.
Peter, could you speak to...
Soundcheck, soundcheck, soundcheck, soundcheck, three, two, one, soundcheck.
Is that loud enough?
Soundcheck, soundcheck, three, two, one, soundcheck.
Tell me when you're happy, Miles.
Kerry, can you hear Peter?
Yes, I can hear fine.
Thank you.
Okay.
It's his audio level.
What's the level of the room like?
Okay, Miles?
Yeah, the level of the room is okay.
Yeah.
Okay, well, Kerry, we are in record here, and we will give you as host in your show.
So we will be an outside source to you, okay?
Yes, and I just want to say that we are now live over my YouTube channel as well and broadcasting from there.
So we have an audience already gathering.
So you guys are getting some live broadcasting happening right now over the internet.
And right now you are in high definition on the recorder here looking fantastic.
Thank you very much.
Okay, Kerry Cassidy, the BASIS Project final event of 2016.
It is welcoming to Kerry Cassidy, Project Camelot with BASIS and Peter Padgett.
I'm sure we're going to have a very interesting discussion.
Over to you, Kerry Cassidy.
Okay.
Well, actually, this is really sort of flying by the seat of our pants, so to speak, because I do not know what topics Peter would like to cover, and I'm happy to go anywhere he'd like to go, and certainly we can go back and forth.
Maybe the first thing to do is to introduce this event.
Miles, if you're still there and able to do so, because we are broadcasting, if you could give a short sort of introduction to this event.
Well, this is Miles talking.
Essentially, we were both at an event, all of us, Peter and you, we shared a conference earlier this year, and there was one member of the conference which was meant to be here was Max Spears.
So do we want to go over the events of Max Spears?
The last time we talked Kerry together was about that.
Do you want to cover that?
And then Peter was at the event also, but not that particular event with Max.
He would have been if he would have been here.
But how do you want to talk about that?
Okay.
Well, maybe you could bring us up to date because some of the people who are on my YouTube channel will have seen our previous interview that was actually done live over YouTube talking about what was going on with Max Fears and his death at the time.
Can you catch us up on any new developments since that time?
I'm sure that people would be interested.
Well, what happened here was that I read a statement from his mother, and I'm going to try and find that.
I don't know if that's lying around as a sheet of paper somewhere, but essentially what happened was that Max's mother has made a statement saying that he was clean, he had come off the drugs, he did have a drug habit, and if I can just get his phone to get to work...
Essentially, Kerry, I'm speaking off camera here, doing the controls.
Essentially, and I'm going to fade you out because we're getting a bit of woolly gating howl around there.
So, what was happening was that if there's a sheet of paper lying around near the podium somewhere with the statement from Vanessa, Vanessa made a statement, okay, Perhaps you could summarize, Miles, that might be more expedient.
Okay, she gave me a specific statement to read out.
It's very hot here, Kerry, and touchscreens...
Okay, that's a rare occurrence in England, as it is.
Okay, just for the sake of your audience, this is a statement from Vanessa, Max Spears' mother, to be read publicly, and it is this.
This is hard, phrasing things while we are in the thick of a major investigation.
Max was clean.
He spoke openly of his battles with addiction.
I spent the last two years seeing him daily in broad stairs in Canterbury.
He was clean of drugs.
Fact, explanation mark.
He was also clear of all medication.
I saw a doctor with him for checkups.
He invited me to go with him because he often suffered with stomach issues, which is an important issue about the black substance which he vomited up prior to his death when they still refused to take him to hospital.
Something catastrophic happened in Poland.
No autopsy results at all yet.
Now this is only a couple of days ago and as far as I'm aware he's had an autopsy being conducted on him now here for the last three weeks.
No autopsy results yet.
He spoke with me daily from Poland and even said to me the names of people I should keep away from as they are dangerous.
He told his very close English friend here in Canterbury who to keep away from.
From me if he should die.
That's if Max should die.
He knew he was the focus of some significantly dangerous people.
He feared for me and his brother and sister.
He was speaking openly, naming names.
And sorry, naming names.
It was as if he dropped his guard because he felt he had to speak out.
He believed firmly that we are extremely close to the end of life as we know it.
And that's it, Miles.
Can you say this?
Are you happy to do so?
And I'm happy to say so.
And I know Peter Padgett, in his presentation in Warminster, did say, at least twice, Peter, we do not have much now left.
So perhaps that could be the subject of our conversation in the next few moments.
Okay.
Why don't we introduce Peter Padgett to the audience for those people who are not familiar with him.
That would probably be a good way to go.
Also, Peter can introduce himself or you, Miles, can do the honors.
Well, Peter's on the podium in front of the camera and he's dressed very well with the school tie.
And Peter, it's over to you.
First of all, I want to thank Myles for his tremendous efforts over this weekend and my dear chairman Kerry and all of you people in America, all you lovely people, people in the audience who have come considerable distances to be here.
We have had a lot of disruption due to the changes and Myles has been magnificent in overcoming those.
I had never met Max.
I have no knowledge of the case so I cannot comment on it.
And even if I did, it would be inappropriate when an investigation is underway.
My only understanding is that there is an investigation underway, but I cannot comment on it and I have no access to the data.
However, over to you, Cassidy.
Where do you want to start?
Okay.
Well, like I said, give yourself a little background so that people who are not familiar and have not yet seen your lovely presentations from my conferences at the UK, one of which is now available on my Vimeo channel, the one in Watford, which is where you were speaking.
And so they can go there after this broadcast if they haven't already and for a very, very low price, be able to see you at less than a price of a latte.
I'm sorry to say, but the Internet being the way it is, we wanted to make sure that there was no barrier to entry for people to be able to hear what you had to say.
So or any of our other speakers.
So could you introduce yourself rather briefly and say something about your intelligence background and so on?
Thank you.
Well, first of all, you can find me on Facebook, which is a new endeavor for me.
I have an IT expert taking care of this because I'm a bit of a dinosaur on computers these days, although I do have a degree in computing science, but we had punch tape and we didn't even have VDUs in those days.
You can find me on Peter Padgett Disclosure and also Peter Padgett on Facebook.
You can contact me on email peter, P-E-T-E-R, Padgett, no space, P-E-G-E-T, 2012 at yahoo.co.uk.
I will answer every one of you, if I can, within 24 hours.
I'm available for advice, a bit like the Queen, advice, encouragement, and warning.
Warning.
My background is classified.
I don't exist.
I officially don't exist.
It's by tearing up all my paperwork anyway.
Here I am.
I'm a hologram.
A hologram for you to watch Red Wolf.
Hello America!
We're here in this village of Pusey, which is in Wiltshire, near crop circle country, which is magical country.
You should try visiting it sometime.
And we have a conference which you might call Conspiracy International, which is a basis organized by Miles, which he's been doing for some 20 odd years, bringing together all kinds of different people, including me.
I don't claim to be the weirdest of them all, but I'll try.
You must excuse me, America, for my English sense of humor.
It's not said in a malicious way, it is just that I see the funny side of everything.
Because if you don't laugh down here, you would start crying.
We've got less than 150 people in the audience today, and I will claim that we're not on live television.
This means we are compliant with the OSA, which is the official secret site to which I am compliant and respectful.
I have protected this country in whatever small way I can, along with thousands of other people for over 53 years, or in fact 53 years.
For those of you who don't know, I was for a very short period of time a temporary scientific advisor to the Master's Cabinet Office.
I'm Mrs.
Oli Zuckerman, who was the Chief Scientific Advisor at that time.
And I'm accredited with inventing the current oil pollution technology, which is distributed worldwide because of CBD oil.
I get the royalty from that.
I gave that to Mrs.
Oli.
And that was to clean up oil spills, was it not?
It was a floating dam system, and it was also a clean-up barge system, which they then further developed.
It was extensively used, and has been extensively used in every single oil spill from the date that it was invented, which is courtesy of a tank called Toya Canyon, which went on the rocks down in Cornwall, which is the west of England.
And it has saved, hopefully, hundreds of thousands of seabirds and a life of a marine nature.
It doesn't work in swell.
It works up to about two to three feet.
Anyway, moving on.
Where do you begin?
Einstein said you measure a circle beginning anywhere.
My point of view is extremely optimistic, positive and upward moving.
I'm not a doom and gloomer.
I'm not a whistleblower.
Sorry about that, Kerry.
You can't add me to your list of whistleblowers.
I've served the crown for a long time.
I still serve the crown now.
I believe that having a constitutional monarch is a damn good idea.
We won't get into politics because it gets me into trouble.
I have serious off-world connections.
I have a degree of influence.
I have a degree of advisory capacity.
Don't ask me for too much information.
You will have to accept that on some things I must say I can't answer that.
Where do you want to start?
Okay, well, I appreciate having you here with us today and being able to join this wonderful conference, which I had hoped to be in person but was unable to stay any longer, having been gone already in England for quite a while.
But at any rate, you know, the wonders and the magic of technology.
Well, what I wanted to talk about today was actually quantum computing and artificial intelligence And the disparity between what is in essence the secret space program as I know it and what is the mainstream science and how there is a huge gap between the two.
And so perhaps you can address this from your point of view, Peter.
You do have a scientific background and you have also acted as, I think you might call yourself an agent.
Isn't that right?
In service to Her Majesty.
I don't know whether you consider yourself having worked directly for MI5 or MI6 or both.
Well, I can't comment on that directly, but all I say is that I've been on the side since I was 17 years old and I have willingly put myself in harm's way and successfully interceded a number of overseas intelligence agency operations, particularly in the Iraq war, both one and two, which did involve a number of things that we don't really need to waste time on here today.
My criteria is twofold.
One, I have been indirectly and directly in touch with UTs, ultra-terrestrials, which I take a difference in the word ET, which is extraterrestrial, because a lot of the things that we're going to be talking about and have been discussed here at this conference are in fact solar system based.
You don't actually have to look into the far distances of the universe to find out where some of these things and where these people come from.
I'm going to cover your question by going back in history because I like history because I'm a bit of a historian, I'm a bit of an analyst.
What you have to understand is that an earlier speaker today spoke of the idea of first contact which to me, although I respect his perspective, is of course farcical Because the Earth as a planet was first visited by Impact ET probably about 450,000 years ago,
if not longer, because we don't have much information or data that goes back before that, because it simply erodes, it's not there.
And they colonized this planet and genetically engineered The human race as we know it today, as indeed in the various forms that it was before, which have died out, and in the various root races which you see out there in the various continents, hence the different characteristics, the slanted eyes, the different skin textures.
I treat all people as individuals.
I do not take too much regard of the cover or the container, as the ETs would have it, in which you reside.
I look rather deeper than that into your energetic soul which indeed you all have and you all have energetic souls and you should all know if you don't already know already that you might die biologically within a hundred years of being birthed approximately but in fact of course you go on and the fit that goes on the sections of you the elements of you that go on are my concern because that is why you are here you're not here just to Get a job
and look after your kids and keep your nose clean.
My remit in the extraterrestrial sense of the word, because I'm a hybrid, I am 50.8% palladium and 49.2% homo sapien, homo sapien.
Okay.
It gives advantages and disadvantages.
Let me ask you, Peter.
I'm having trouble with what I call the spectrum spectrum.
Because when you come in from different levels of matter, and we've gone into this earlier over the conference that there is the physical, which we're sitting in here today, there's the next level, which has been dubbed the astral, which is a word I don't like, but it's one that people tend to understand, and above that is a level called the etheric, and then you go on to various other levels.
These are vibrations of matter and of time and of location.
I've already commented that if you look out you can see yourself out there in space ahead of you and behind you in time.
This is in fact being acknowledged by astronomers already, believe it or not.
And indeed if you look into the far universe you will see galaxies at least three times coming in on different tracks of photon pathway and they will be in different time as well.
So your historical perspective It's important to you, and so then you go from that early colonization here on Earth, and working with the natural animals that occurred here, the mammalians after the dinosaurs,
which of course were wiped out a long time ago, and then the genetic engineering of the helpers, which you now call human beings, and the various variants of that to help various finer, and I use that word finer, In terms of fragile beings who came here who could not so easily cope with the pressure, the gravity and the basically other difficulties of the planet because it was very primitive at that time, still primitive now.
Joke.
So, I expect you to laugh now then.
Peter, can I ask you a question?
Go ahead.
You say you're something like 52% Pleiadian.
How do you know?
Have you had your DNA tested?
No, that's classified too.
It is on record.
I wouldn't worry about things like that.
I only do that in order for you to understand I do have a double perspective.
I have a loyalty, a very strong loyalty to the United Kingdom, who I have great faith in, We have a thousand years of history.
My family has served the crown for over a thousand years and we're quite proud of that and we have a bit of experience of doing that.
And also I have a loyalty, if you wish, to what you might affectionately call upstairs or you might want to call inside, if you wish.
That there is another level which is more concerned with who you are, what you are, where you're going rather than whether you can eat at the end of the day And indeed, as I've discussed earlier over this weekend, you are now entering a test period when you will be challenged by yourself, by your karma, by all the things you have done or not done over the millennia.
And I do mean millennia.
This is the end of a great day.
When I say the end, it's the transition of a great day of approximately 26,000 years.
Don't get too hung up on the mathematics by which you are all on test.
You're all testing yourselves and you will decide how and where you're going to spend the next day and what you're going to need to redo or has been ticked off.
Because you have to master this plane in order to do anything further beyond it.
Those of you in America, particularly you might think that you're going to jump on an ascension cloud in a few months' time.
It depends on the qualification of your karma and whether you can, in fact, Qualify for any kind of removal from the wheel of life, as the Chinese would say.
And indeed, I don't particularly want to.
I find this place extraordinarily interesting.
In fact, if you look at ETs in their physical presentation, a lot of them are moderately boring.
I find the human race and the human civilizations a lot more interesting than the various ET groups and their agendas coming here.
I have to say again, working to the word UT, ultra-dimensional, or UD if you use, that a lot of the things you're dealing with here in this conference, and indeed on your channel, Cassidy, are resident here.
They are not necessarily from any distant star.
They have been here for a very long time.
And moving on in that theme, that because the original civilization that came here did have interdimensional capacity, and interdimensional understanding and technology which is pretty much beyond the remit of where conventional science works today and confines itself into that very limited understanding that they were working ultra-dimensionally as well as physically.
They did over a long period of time produce a very large number of megaliths And stone structures, pyramids, obelisks, other things.
Much of which is still completely misunderstood or has so eroded in its technical bits that were added on to it that you have no idea.
It's a bit like taking a, say, take a sort of a Mac Air, right?
Mac Air Black computer.
And say you left it for a long period of time, we're talking thousands of years, such that a lot of the electronics and interior re-eroded and vanished just by natural erosion.
And you're left with a case and then perhaps a bit of glass, which has a long life too.
And you're starting to figure out what the hell did this thing do if you found it, say, 10,000 years after it was made.
But all of the clues as to what it really does are gone.
They have been oxidized.
They have been leached away by nature.
Now, moving on to that, which is useful, and stop me any time you want to chip in, Kerry, is there have been a number of so-called crashes on this planet of craft, which were assumed to be ET. Some of them were, most of them were, some of them were not.
And my previous speaker, who was discussing some of the 1930s, Development, principally in Germany, I'm sure, gave some information on that.
But some of these craft were nuts and bolts and produced here, and indeed are still to this day.
However, some of the crashes, it is to my knowledge, were deliberate.
The human race, as I've tried to do, is very resistant to change, very resistant to innovation.
Especially if it endangers cartels, Operations and the established order, business as usual.
So, as per the fact that you had, courtesy partly of Nikola Tesla, a lot of access to free energy and all of that, I won't go into the details of that, some many, many years ago, that was suppressed.
Many inventions have been bought in and suppressed, which would endanger the oil cartels And the shareholders of those corporations and other corporations.
My own family makes money out of this stuff, I shouldn't complain.
And so you are left with, as you commented on, and this is where we're going with this, a two-stage, two-level civilization with a huge disconnect, let alone the complication of ETUD,
ultra-dimensionals, Which, you know, makes it very complicated for you to understand because to the general public, and I'm sure there's not many general public between your channel and the audience here, most of you have had some kind of reading and exposure to this data, that you get a general classification of UFO, which is virtually meaningless, which means something you haven't identified.
But it covers a whole range of different phenomena and craft and origins Some of those origins are here and have been here because the original civilization after the film Forbidden Planet,
which I encourage you all to take a look at, a very early cult film, and it's full of coded messages and in plain sight data, that the original civilization which came here entrenched itself all over the world, not just in what you call Atlantis, which was a name invented by Plato, All over the world.
Some people call it Amira, some people call it New.
It doesn't really matter what name you give it.
Names are designed to stop you learning not to give you information.
And it was very pandemic.
That means it's everywhere and we're there for a very long period of time.
It then suffered after the catastrophe on Mars, which we're now documented as by the scientific data was a major catastrophe.
Difficult to date.
I'm trying to get out of the data the respective short half-lives of the thin covering of radioactivity on Mars.
Thin covering so it's not coming out of the soil and the other radioactive decay products which only are produced by atomic explosions.
So there has been a conflict on Mars in the deep past.
Indeed, one of the Indian satellites I seem to record an atomic explosion on Mars as recently as 2014, which concerns me deeply.
However, moving on.
Well, actually...
Peter, I want to ask you because you're talking about Mars and actually as part of my presentation today I actually have an anecdote which is rather interesting and pertinent to this discussion.
I had a whistleblower contact me who worked at basically an underground base in Texas and he was telling me that in essence The secret space program is actually going on to what he called fourth dimensional Mars, so that we are going interdimensional already as part of the space program.
Are you familiar with this notion?
Yes.
It comes out in 10 seconds.
Where I was going with the fact that the former great civilization, I call that very much a great civilization, using natural energy, Got blown away by the natural catastrophe which is he recorded in all legends basically called the Flood.
And you know was lost.
So you're left now with the residue, the remnants of the outer cases.
You're probably familiar that as early as 1964 there was research in the United States into interdimensional elements of travel.
And it has been commented on considerably by quantum scientists and has been researched considerably in Russia.
Russia, in the former USSR and now Russian Federation, has been much more open-minded to the concept of these areas of interest at an academic level, not just at a fringe level.
And that has given them considerable advantage in certain areas, not least to all weapons systems at the current time.
They've also used it for spy information recovery systems, using sensitives, of which they have many.
This was, you know, also developed at Fort Meade, but then allegedly shut down, although I think it just moved sideways.
So what you have is this very strange situation where the general population listening to BBC and CNN And getting their daily propaganda is kept at a level of amusement, not encouraged to think or question, in fact constantly distracted, sometimes quite drastically distracted.
And then you have various interest levels who benefit from that from a commercial point of view, business as usual, and Basically run along with that, with the media, in order to keep everything running tickety-boo.
Now this could go on indefinitely in that zone, except for the fact that the cosmos, as Einstein said, God does not play dice with the universe, runs on a cyclical basis, and occasionally, in long periods of time,
so you forget the last one, there are periods of examination, test, editing, and evolution of If you recall, the principle of Darwin, which I don't necessarily endorse, but the principle of Darwin was that out of a particular creation line and species, the weaker elements out of their inappropriate colors or usage or color, whatever, would die out.
And the more capable and appropriate versions of the species would go forward.
Survival of the fittest, as you might put it.
Now, in modern society, of course, we protect, as indeed does nature, and even lions feed their aged old lions.
We protect disabled people, generally speaking.
And so, you know, we've got a slight change of that situation, but I don't want to comment on that.
But what I'm really pointing out is that then, going to your side, which you're interested in, is out of the...
Work of the Germans, principally in the 1930s, and all of that which was covered by my former speaker in great detail, I'm sure, we have the fact, which does seem to be a fact much to the surprise of people,
including me, when I first learned this, that the Germans were developing anti-vermetic machines prior to the Second World War, And never fortunately developed them into a military platform other than for surveillance and reconnaissance because they were principally quite light and they were self-contained in their field system so you couldn't readily mount a gun on them.
I would suggest that the photographs of German UFOs with an iron cross on the side and a gun underneath probably are not genuine.
It would be incompatible with the drive system because you have to have rounded surfaces, otherwise you will spray off electrostatic energy on any point structure, which is why most UFOs are rounded.
When you go inside them, they're very rounded.
There are no point structures.
And some of the crew wear electrostatic suits like for example you may be familiar if you have any electrical engineers there who do work on high-tension lines you know that one of the very dangerous but apparently safe methods of repairing high-tension lines is you lower an operative from a helicopter on a live high-tension line wearing an electrostatic protection suit it's a metal suit and he can actually work on the line while it's in full operation just like your pigeons will
stop on a high-tension line Because they're not earthed, they feel no current.
They might feel a slight tingle when they first touch it.
And in fact, the only reason why they wear those suits is to stop that initial burn.
Like when you get out of your car and it's a very dry, hot day, you might feel an electrostatic ping because the car has become charged.
And as you earth that, you feel a shock.
And when something is changing polarity or changing voltage, It will give you a temporary shock.
So, anyway, cutting to the chase, yes, there does seem to be now, because we're covering a lot of data here, a terrestrial-based secret space program, as you put it, which appears to run in parallel to the officially announced and photographed and documented NASA and Russia and India and China programs.
You never hear much about the India and China programs.
Over here on the BBC, but they've got very, very advanced programs now.
And I did work with Colonel Ed Mitchell for a whole year in Florida, and I can tell you despite all of the conspiracy theories, they did go to the moon.
And 50% of those astronauts who went to those long missions are suffering quite badly from the radiation exposure at that time.
But NASA, and this is no great secret, but I think I'm doing NASA a favor by saying this, NASA, at the time, was engaged in a huge public relations exercise with Russia over the predominance of their efforts in space.
And, of course, the Americans, needing belt braces and bits of string, did produce a very well-documented portfolio of photographs, which were shot on the ground in perfect color balance and framing.
To be released at an appropriate time of their efforts on the moon.
And the moon ones are the fuzzy ones.
The sharp ones are probably done in Hollywood or out in the desert nearby.
And they, of course, are catching the blowback from that because now people have worked out, well, hang on, the lights are wrong, the shadow is wrong, and we can adjust the background contrast and actually see the studio walls in the background.
Peter, we have a whistleblower who states that yes indeed we did go but in fact we had help as he puts it.
Are you aware of this?
Yes.
I think we had surveillance from the contacts who came and spoke to me when I was over there.
I know that we had escort.
I think we had a certain amount of interference on 13, which was, we were doing something rather unethical.
Wait one moment.
When you say, when you were over there, are you suggesting that you were over in the moon, or were you over somewhere?
No, no, I've been in America.
I've been in America.
Oh, all right, fine.
Yeah, sorry, sorry, I should have clarified that.
My apologies.
Yeah, I think we definitely had escort because the human race has had oversight from a number of different elements for a very long time.
I mean, there was, after the disaster, which you call the flood, a long period of time when things were pretty chaotic, about 4,000 years, when things were very chaotic, and then other civilizations started up again, Sumeria being probably one of the first, and Egypt, of course, went A series of geniuses on 3,200 years.
And they got a lot of help from some engineers and other people who decided to give them a bit of a shove to get them going again.
Then you come through to a series of periods of history when things were principally on the back burner and the human race were just a resource.
And we have to cover this thorny subject of the fact that part of the human race Agenda, let me put this in a different way, part of the human race's purpose to some ETs is as a resource.
You've already had in this meeting here the indication of large cylindrical craft coming down over the lakes of Ireland where the water is pure, it's fresh water, picking up large quantities of water because water is a great natural resource on this planet.
And they were picking up fresh water and taking it principally to the moon, because if you look at some of the close shots of domes on the moon, you see the green inside.
Well, green things don't grow without water.
And the only point in the extraction of the moon rocks when you can just come down here and get some.
It's cheaper.
So, yeah, they don't even have to pay Thames water, do they?
That's an in-joke, because we pay a lot for water over here.
So, anyway, cutting to the chase.
Over a period of time, the human race was, and their animals, a resource of enzymes, food, resources, helpers, that's basically spelled slaves, and that carried on for a while until you had something which started off with the Renaissance and then the Industrial Revolution when it was decided by somebody somewhere that it would be a nice idea to educate these people down here and take them to the next level,
one of the former levels, but a different level Of civilization which had occurred before.
So there was no attempt to reinstigate the original natural methods of energy production.
In fact, quite the contrary.
And in fact, as you probably gathered, if ET wanted to make contact with you, they could do it tomorrow.
There's no problem.
If they're not making contact with you openly, there's a bloody good reason.
And the reason is that it serves their purpose in the way not to make general contact.
Although, in certain selective ways, contact has existed for a long time.
We won't go into the stories about Eisenhower and the meetings in the desert and what have you, because they're very well known.
I don't want to go over old ground.
Out of that, unfortunately, Particularly the American administration.
I'm not anti-American.
I'm pro-American for a very long time now because I sit on the fence.
I'm pro-everybody.
I think that the planet has been looked at as a whole rather than having silly nationalistic divides.
I'm not a globalist either.
But division is not helpful in any political or geopolitical sense of the word.
But that doesn't mean to say I'm anti-democracy.
I'm very, very democratic.
I'm very pro-British.
Well, that actually gets into a question that I have.
What happened was that particularly the United States territories, which is not just the mainland United States, but also their territories in Puerto Rico and such, became subject to a contract between certain ETs who then systematically started to break that contract and utilize the human race in a much more exploitative manner.
And one of the systems I'm very aware of was, if you take the Roswell case, which is amazingly and boringly very well known, and there were many other cases.
If you read a book, The Day After Roswell, by Lieutenant Colonel Corso, who had the highest clearance in the United States, higher than mine, and basically said that the technology in the crashed craft was then Teased out of it and distributed under the cover of maybe we got this from the Russians and that jump-started many of our present technological innovations,
the microchip, for example, which we benefit from today.
Now, I would brief you that there is an agenda to this.
If you are a few hundred people and you are coming to a planet Which at the present time is 7 billion, they say.
There's no accurate figures on this.
At that time it was considerably less than 7 billion.
And you're looking to either A, educate that population, or B, utilize it in some more utilitarian way.
You can't do it if they're still dealing with sticks and stones.
You can't do it if they're still riding around on horses and sending messengers by carrier pigeon.
So you have to introduce A technology, and Mars will understand where I'm going on this, Mars is our big technical band here, is that you have to introduce a technical system which is beneath you as a culture and yet can be utilized to the exploitation and control and monitoring of that civilization.
And when you realize you're dealing with people or entities who live a lot longer than you do, a lot longer than you do, So to them 50 years is no big deal, 150 years is still no big deal.
Entities I'm familiar with live at least 450 years biologically and the etheric entities live over 10,000 years before they translate into another thought form.
I'm using that word to give you that energetic thing.
So what I'm saying is some of that seeding by which anti-craft, which was so derelict But out of date, that they were inappropriate to the flight patterns that consist of both medieval and prior to that time,
were crashed and recovered and the, I'm not being xenophobic, the monkeys went in there and took away all the toys and started developing them for themselves.
Hence you now have the internet and all of these other innovative systems Supercomputers, which I'm a bit familiar with, which even as we speak here at this very minute, are monitoring every word and indeed are monitoring every single test cell phone in this room, every single communication.
Your emails, telephone calls, texts have been monitored for years.
Every single word, not by people, by supercomputers.
And then if you introduce a word, we're playing a game here, Cassidy.
Plutonium killed the president.
What's the Queen doing tomorrow?
Bombshell in London.
Any other key words?
We've already got some attention.
The computer's flashed up at least three levels.
Now if we go on, we can get up to level 15 at which we get an operator.
We used to play this game.
Then we give them recipe of the day.
I got a memo about this.
You're wasting people's time.
Stop it, Peter.
But you see my point.
Now, people worry about this.
They worry about privacy.
They worry about, my God, they know what time I go to the loo.
I saw a film presented by the American Army on one of their operations, and they actually flagged that they were monitoring this particular terrorist group by drones, which can stay up there for about 12 hours or more, just wandering around very quietly.
You should be able to see them, but most people don't.
And they had worked out when this particular terrorist group Went to the loo.
Which he did on a very regular basis, good lad.
And on that morning, he had a big surprise.
And he didn't wake up after he had done his business.
I'm not going to be too graphic about that, but you get my point.
There's an obsession in surveillance about getting to know your patterns.
And Amazon, as you know, probably has the biggest file on you.
They know all of your buying patterns from your credit cards.
They know what you're going to buy for your kids for Christmas before you do.
And they've stopped it and got it made in China.
Got it made in China.
I'm not going to go on that one, but you know where that goes.
Well, God bless America.
Get some of your manufacturing back.
Now, moving on.
So what I'm saying is, dear Miles, who I have, Barry is a huge friend, yells and screams, we've got to stop this stuff.
We had a thing in this country several hundred years ago, or not that long ago, When we were weaving, and we were building weaving machines, mechanical machines to help weaving, and so there was a protest.
And the machines were broken because it was going to take work away from the seamstresses or the other people who were doing that.
Well, we're in the same situation now.
You have this technology.
It is out there.
You can't stop it.
All you can do is interact with it.
And here's the secret, because I've worked with it.
When I was at Birmingham University, the English electric KDF9 was the third after Glatchley.
I discovered you could interact with the bloody machine.
It was very slow.
You put a program in, run for eight hours.
This thing was bigger than this room.
You do less than half of your cell phone that's in your pocket.
And we had two engineers sitting In an anti-rim drinking coffee, waiting for it to break down, which he did on a regular basis.
And I've been sitting at the condolet house, I was third in charge of this beast, that's what we call it, the beast.
They had monitor digital lives, well they weren't digital, they were all little bulbs in those days.
And they flashed and flashed and flashed.
And of course when they stopped flashing, the thing had crashed.
And I would be reading the Times, because I had nothing better to do that day, So wait for this damn program to crash.
And I'd look up and I'd think she's gonna crash now, and she would crash.
Now, was that me interacting with the machine, or was it the machine interacting with me?
I don't know.
You and Gellar could do the same thing.
And one of my previous wives, and I had been married, but not quite so many as in kicking everybody out, could do this.
In fact, she couldn't even go.
Good God, Penfold.
Right, okay.
She could actually crash computers.
She couldn't have a computer.
She couldn't go into a supermarket without walking through the sensors in the door and setting the damn things off, which is very embarrassing when you try to explain.
I haven't nicked anything.
I've just got a very strong auric field.
Now, your auric field is about 40,000 volts.
You can see it.
Lots of people in this room can see it.
I can see it.
I can even show you real photographs, not just Mickey Mouse photographs.
I've got some back there.
It is another level of your being.
It controls your physical being.
Now, yes, the Russians and the Americans and various other people, the Chinese as well, have got into all of this stuff with some degree of expertise.
Conventional science is scared shitless of this because it can't define how it's done.
In fact, Ed Mitchell said to me, we know it exists, but we don't know how it works.
We don't know how it works.
What's the medium of transmission of telepathy?
I remember him saying that to me specifically, almost in those exact words.
How does telepathy work?
You know, we're talking about radio waves and EM and microwaves, but how does telepathy work?
We know it works.
When the astronauts were going to the moon and they came back, he said to me, we weren't ready for this.
We were test pilots.
We weren't ready for what happened to us, you know, in their sleep.
They would have out-of-body experiences, they'd find themselves back in their homes with people, you know, who they were emotionally related to, wives, children, seeing events of mundane nature, and then to realize when they got home that the event that they had dreamt was a real event.
They had come out of their bodies energetically, gone home, spent time with their wife and children, they couldn't see them, and then gone back and just thought it was a dream.
Some of you have, I'm sure, very interesting dreams.
Anyway, let me know.
Peter, thank you for all of that.
I want to say that it is a very interesting time right now, and we do have evidence in the form of some recent talks, or relatively recent, by, for example, a person named Geordi, and his last name is Rose, and And he owns this company, I think it's called D-Wave.
And he's talking about quantum computers that are going to be able to, he thinks, in the future.
And he was talking at this time, I think 2015 or even maybe 2013.
Going to be able to duplicate humans, which is very interesting.
But the trouble is that we already know that this is going on in what I call and what is known as the secret space program already.
So here you have a brilliant man.
He's got a very sophisticated company.
And apparatus, you know, this machine, he calls actually, it's kind of like a fridge, and operates using the quantum chip, and basically is able to, well, quantumly compute...
And incredible amounts of information and data, etc.
Then you have John Searle, who is a fascinating individual and we interviewed many, many years ago in Britain, who is now looking at least 10 and maybe 20 years younger than when we first met him, may I say.
And interestingly now I believe is a professor at UC Berkeley.
So he is talking about consciousness and that computers simply do not have consciousness, which does relate to this notion of how does telepathy work.
So do you want to comment on any of that?
Because we've got some very big gaps here.
Let me just give you some reassurance.
And dispel some of the paranoia which is out there.
E.T. made human beings in their present form and in other forms quite a long time ago.
Human beings are very efficient biological beings who do all kinds of interesting things and can be quite clever.
Some of them.
You don't need and you would not want to replace human beings just because you had a capacity to make a machine which could duplicate some of the functions that a human being can undertake.
These robots are useful in difficult environments.
I'll give you an example.
In Fukushima, where the radiation from the accident is so high, A lot of that clean-up is being done by robots if it isn't being done by young Japanese men who brought onto the site for three or four days, over which they gain a whole year's radiation exposure.
Radiation builds up in cumulative places.
What I'm pointing out to you is, despite the paranoia, there is no intention, nor any economic argument, that one would replace the human race with robots.
You can augment the human race with robots in the same way that you augment your daily life with laptop computers.
You can do calculations much faster than you can in your head and indeed gives you power to your elbow.
It is a miracle and a miracle maybe a why that China has recently built three factories, plants that are production plants almost totally automated and have just a few staff when in fact China has something like 25% of the world's population and has them at very low cost labor and very compliant so why would you bother to spend
money because it can't be an economic argument because these factories would cost more to manufacture than having a couple of thousand compliant workers but the point is is that human beings And indeed, upstairs, downstairs, also like to have everything as a capacity.
You know, I've got so many computers in my house now, it's ridiculous, most of them sitting in cupboards collecting dust because in 18 months they've gone out of date, and you want the latest thing, which you're told you've got to have, otherwise you're a dinosaur.
And indeed you're not compliant with the latest programs.
Miles has had a problem today because suddenly he came in on the wrong program.
My point is that theoreticians love to scare you in saying, "Oh, you're a hopeless human being, I can build a robot that can do better than you, and all I can do is change its motor every five and all I can do is change its motor every five And when it's finished, like on Star Wars, it can be picked up by a great big grabbing machine and broken down and we can nick the gold out of it.
Right.
But actually, Peter...
Peter, actually, the question is not whether or not humans are scared of robots, actually.
I think that that's sort of overemphasized and maybe a misnomer.
But I have to say that I think that what we're really talking about is what is consciousness.
And when you were talking about what is telepathy and the fact is that John Searle, in a sense, is tapping into something which robots don't have and I think it's more important to emphasize what they don't have rather than what they do have.
Sorry, Peter, if you just hold a second.
We've got 15 minutes to clear the hole, so we must come off at the bottom of the hour, Kerry.
That's half past.
Yeah, I'm working strictly to that.
Just so that Kerry knows.
Kerry, we've got 15 minutes, okay?
Yes.
Yeah, I'll work strictly to that.
I used to work for the BBC. We used to work to the second Mars, so no big deal.
Right.
Well, that's an easy one.
God did not fart and create the universe.
Silly.
There was no Big Bang.
What a silly idea.
The universe was always there, always will be there.
It's continually becoming more complex.
The basic energy in the universe is what the basic energy is.
The energy at the final frequency is a lot greater than at this energy level of physical 3D. Consciousness occurs pandemically We're saved for the sake of argument for simplicity throughout the galaxy.
Let's take the galaxy as an intelligent entity in its own right.
Say like a jellyfish.
Not dissimilar in form, right?
And every cell of the jellyfish knows what it has to do and where it has to go and what organ it's a part of, as indeed is it in your bodies.
But let's stick with this nice paradigm of the jellyfish and the galaxy.
So, let's assume that in that complexity, the jellyfish has an evolution of primary to complex evolution, which you will find, I will maintain throughout the universe, is that the, well, it depends where you want to start, spring, summer, autumn, and fall, sorry, spring, summer, fall, I'm trying to be American here, and winter, is cyclical, and everything is cyclical.
It might be very long term, but it's cyclical.
So you've got an overall consciousness which is in every single thing because it is actually just there.
You can argue that it all exists at a point and everything else is purely a vibration.
That's another way of looking at it.
It's a bit like trying to decide whether a photon is a particle or a wave.
Everything in that universe, or let's say the galaxy, let's keep it simple, has an address which is peculiar to itself and has a time address as well as a spatial address.
Now, as technically everything knows where everything else is, you then just have a question of filtration and accommodation.
In your body sitting here, you're listening to me conveyed by acoustic sound.
You're listening to me by acoustic sound conveyed by electronic signals conveyed across by a satellite.
You are maybe in control of how you sit, how you breathe, but 99.999% of what is happening in you is automated within your biological system.
by the bacteria and the neurological systems which form your bodies, which you inherited, in the same way that when a swift, which is a bird that flies very fast and nests in very high buildings, usually spires of cathedrals in England, and that swift baby, when it is pushed out of its nest by its mother, must learn to fly in about Two nanoseconds, otherwise it's going to hit the deck at 150 miles an hour and be dead.
So it knows how to fly even before it attempts to fly.
And you could argue that's genetic memory.
But my point is that that bird has inherited, and this is true of all of you.
Do you wake up as a baby wondering how your heart works?
Hey, I've just been born!
How's this damn thing in here work?
I'd better give it a big bang!
Do I breathe?
No.
Is the doctor going to help me with that?
Is that going to spack me on the backside to help me breathing?
I suggest the baby might start breathing by itself.
It will cry, which is part of the initial process.
So what I'm pointing out is a lot of endemic intelligence and consciousness which is just there.
Now, when you get it, you're talking about communication.
Telepathy is another form of communication.
And what you're talking about in telepathy is principally thought form which precipitates down into language.
Whether it be French, Spanish, American, English, or Russian, or whatever, it comes down in language.
And it has to go through an interface.
Now, some of you in this room, I know from talking to you, get noises, and you're not nuts.
You get whining noises, you get whistles, you get feelings, whatever you do.
Sometimes you feel them almost acoustically.
And that is usually information.
It's not just tinnitus.
I understand what tinnitus is.
It's usually information which is in your brain or is coming in from inside or outside.
And that is a form, if you wish, Kerry, of telepathy, although it may only be downloaded over some weeks or months, perhaps in dreams, or just in your actions.
And you could argue, and indeed it's the case, my former colleague, I think, commented on this earlier, the Russians, the Chinese, maybe other people, the Americans, Fort Meade, We have done a lot of work on the possibility of the interface of the human brain and language and thought form to computing because computers are sharp.
But the other point I want to make really strong emphasis to all of you people out there is it is interactive.
So if anything is coming into you, you are equally going into it.
Now, I know that there's a concept that some intelligence, as well, artificial intelligence czar, I'm using that not as a person, but as a program, an algorithm, or whatever, if I have it, is controlling everything,
but I would say, my observation, can't see that at a range, my observation, okay, ten, thank you, my observation is that All of you who are interacting, and are aware that you're interacting, and some of that is quite disturbing to you, must understand that you are interacting back.
You are one of the microchips in the system.
The system will respond to you, but you must learn to command.
You must command with confidence and clarity and exactitude, not vague thoughts.
So if a computer is dominating you, you can help dominate it.
It cannot keep you out.
They don't tell you that because the various forces that would like you to be sheeples under the control of the 19 old men who should be dying off naturally sometime in the next few months say no more because the frequency is getting pretty fine now.
You'll find there's a lot of people who will be catching the bus over the next year.
And they will have to pass Peter at the gates, and they'll be up there saying, top that lot up, and they'll say, I don't think you're due with me, you're down there with the other guy.
Well, they'll come back for the next great day, 26,000 years.
So what I'm saying, Kerry, is there's a lot of talk about what is consciousness.
Yes, I would say to you, computers, even when I was working with the English electric computer, Had consciousness because it was responding with me and I was responding with it.
It happens naturally.
Okay, well I would argue that that's not consciousness.
I do appreciate we can impact computers of all kinds, actually.
Certainly electronics of all kinds.
You know, humans have extrasensory abilities, if you will, that go beyond what computers, at least at this time, I interact with my computer.
That doesn't mean it's conscious.
So what you might say is a simulation of reality is not actually reality.
It's a simulation.
And reality is a simulation.
I understand that.
But nonetheless...
The fact is that we can say that a computer is actually behaving just like us.
They may look and behave and so on, like, let's say, the TV show Battlestar Galactica has demonstrated well in advance of a lot of things that they're doing now.
But, you know, the reality is, is this really a conscious being per se?
Is consciousness really inhabiting the computer, per se?
Or is it something else?
Is it more of a mechanistic reaction that has, like they say, it's interesting because Searle is talking about something called syntax versus semantics, and that computers, in essence, Do not have what we know of as semantics.
They can demonstrate understanding, but it does not mean they understand.
I'm going to agree to disagree with you, and I'm going to say that the galaxy...
I'll go one stage.
Quick sentence.
You look at the layout of the universe as you perceive it, you will see that it is very comparable to the layout of a human cell and the human brain.
When you look at the universe, you're looking at a very big brain.
When you're looking at the galaxy, you're looking at an organ.
When you're looking at the solar system, you're looking at a subsection of an organ.
And I would say that if you could get your head around the fact that consciousness, no matter how you define it, I don't care how you define it, Consciousness is.
Consciousness is in every single thing.
Every single thing, as I think Einstein said, there's only one electron, but it gets around all over the place fairly quickly.
I'm not using the right words, but what his concept was, everything is on point.
You are part of, if you want, God, Allah, whatever other words in various cultures you want to invent.
These are all clichés.
That there is consciousness throughout, there's consciousness in that metal chair, there's consciousness in this metal cup, because it is basically an electronic mechanism.
The sun is an electronic mechanism, it produces fission as a by-product, it's not a nuclear reactor, and you are programmed to be accepted into a society that wants you to be passive, Because it likes the idea that you won't rock the boat.
Okay, you're seeing no distinction.
It sounds like you're seeing no distinction between spirit, what we call spirit or soul, and what you are interpreting as consciousness.
So, do you want to address that at all?
Yeah, well, I don't see any difference.
I see that the soul...
Which I've gone into in dialogue here on the various vibrations and levels of the soul.
And your soul is consciousness.
How that soul resides in your body or in your etheric body.
Or for example, my cars always work for me because they're in touch with me and I'm in touch with them.
Other people who have chaotic energy, their cars keep breaking down.
Because the energy is chaotic.
And your energy does have a huge effect on the matter around you.
Energy, soul, consciousness, controls matter.
And computers, not the other way around.
I think we're going to have to love you and leave you, darling, because it's coming up to the hour.
How are we doing, Miles?
Where's my man?
There he is.
At the end of transmission, Peter Padgett and also Kerry Cassidy, if you can hear me, from Pusey.
Oh, I've got a mic.
So, Kerry, thank you very much indeed from Pusey and The Basis Project and thank you once again for a mutual broadcast.
Give Kerry Cassidy and the people a good clap.
I love you all.
I love you all.
Keep the faith.
Keep the faith.
Thank you.
Any last words from Terry Cassidy before I close out?
Not really.
Thank you very much for having me join your conference and hello to everyone in England and at the conference there and online.
We've had quite an audience here online.
I hope we didn't break any of your rules there, Peter, but I think they say c'est la vie.
Thank you, Kerry.
You can find me on Peter Padgett Discoach on Peter Padgett Facebook.
Have a good one.
Bye.
And to Kerry, it's been a great summer.
A great series of events have happened this summer.
Could you say, Peter, I... Mike won.
Right.
Yes, I think that's enough from me, and that's enough from you.
Good night and God bless Carrie Cassidy.
Thank you.
Bye-bye.
Okay, and finally, as we close Faces 2016 on day three, I'd like to say thank you to Christine, Nicole, Miriam, Maria, Busty, Sandra.
By the way, Busty's the man, person.
Okay.
Karen for bringing the targeted individuals together on the Friday.
And the teas and coffees, thank you so much for Jennifer and Charlene Priestley.
Thank you so much.
Taz, Odin, Wild Hunt.
Okay, this is Kerry Cassidy from Project Camelot.
I hope you enjoyed that broadcast.
It's going to be a very interesting time going forward, and I'm glad that the computers managed to broadcast this out live.
I just wanted to draw attention to a couple of things while I still have a small audience here and let you know that...
I am attempting to put together a broadcast to deal with this August remote viewing of an August event by three remote viewers working for Courtney Brown, who apparently landed on a possible incident that could involve the death of a number of individuals due to an incoming object of some kind.
It hits some very tall buildings in a city-like environment somewhere near a bay, which would indicate some kind of coast by the word bay.
And you can certainly go to my website and click on the Courtney Brown remote viewing link and you will get the link to his actual original broadcast and the viewings of those three individuals.
I do want to say that I have invited all of them, all of the remote viewers as well as Courtney, to do a live broadcast on my channel to discuss this incident, potential incident, to drill down into where it might be and I've also put out the word actually several weeks ago to have people who felt they had good remote viewing skills to try to zero in on where on the globe this might occur
so that we could attempt to save some lives.
This is an interesting dynamic when you have remote viewers viewing something that happens in the future In the near future, that they could actually have a hand in possibly modifying in some form or fashion.
Now, there's no guarantee that what they saw is accurate.
It could be another timeline.
There's very good evidence that we live on multiple timelines simultaneously.
And anyone who hasn't read the Seth material, I encourage you to read it.
It's a very old book from Jane Roberts.
Who was channeling an entity named Seth and was talking about multiple timelines in essence multiple worlds that physicists are just now beginning to realize is true.
That was many many years ago.
I read it as a child more or less.
So I can say that this incident I have gotten in touch with Daz Smith and discussed it with him briefly.
He was unwilling to come on the show.
Due to his workload, he has a full-time job and in addition is doing several other remote viewing jobs.
And he did say he'd come on my show at another date.
I also have talked to Dick Allgaier actually via email on August 1st and since then have heard nothing from him.
In spite of my several emails trying to schedule a show with him, he did agree to come on very graciously and do a show on this incident.
Today is, I believe, August 13th, if I have it correct, or 14th.
And I've heard nothing back from him.
There seems to be something interfering with my communication with him.
And I believe perhaps he's been told not to communicate further about this incident.
And I can also say that Courtney Brown declined to also come on and do a show on this incident because he didn't want to so-called, I think as he said, was exploit the incident.
But in the interest of saving lives, this does appear to be a 9-11 type event in the sense that it has an object hitting a number of tall buildings.
And we don't know what that object is.
Keith Hunter, one of the people I interviewed, has said I've stated a theory, which I think is a pretty good one, that says that it could be the incoming of the dragon capsule.
And we're talking about Elon Musk's dragon capsule that is due back here on Earth to splash down alongside Baja California.
In the water, however, if you look at Cabo San Lucas in Baja, you'll see that there is quite a city there, a number of tall buildings.
It is conceivable that it would be or could be shot off course or go off course somehow.
It is interesting in Dick Allgaier's viewing, he literally shows you a diagram in which he sees this incoming object starting out at one side going Having a sort of plasma discharge or some kind of attack which causes an explosion and then in the air and then coming diagonally like this to hit the buildings so that would indicate to me that whatever object this is it is hit off course and
this does indicate it's very likely a man-made object that's not guaranteed there was a lot of wordage such as molten metal in the composition of the object according to Dick Allgaier again And so on.
So we have explosions and various things going on at this particular site, at least as far as this viewing goes.
These viewings have been going on since April.
This is a project that Courtney Brown embarked on using these three viewers.
They have had very accurate readings in advance in, if I understand it correctly, April, May, and June, as well as, not sure about July, and then they actually publicized for the first time in advance of getting the actual,
the readings coming, you know, in other words, rather than going to the end of August, finding out if they were right or wrong, and then making it public, they made this incident In August public before anything actually happened and that brought the public involved and of course Camelot became involved at that point simply because there is something to be said for Seeing the future and the responsibility along
the lines of what that means and that these are not just child's games.
These are real incidents that these people are viewing.
Now, it's a given that they could be wrong.
They could have certain elements wrong, etc., etc.
All of this will pan out, at least on this timeline, in some form or fashion by the end of August.
We will find this out.
So I do want to let you know that Jim Mars has agreed to come on the show.
He agreed and knows Dick Allgaier well.
I've also tried to get in touch with both Daz and Jim Mars to contact on my behalf Dick Allgaier again to see if they could get a breakthrough to communicate with him to find out why he became unavailable after saying he would do the show.
But I've gotten no reply from either of them in that regard, other than Daz had agreed to forward on my email.
So I think...
Jim Mars is out of town right now, and I believe he'll be back in the next couple days.
I do expect to hear from him.
And I will go ahead with this show regardless of whether I can get Dick Allgaier involved with Jim Mars, assuming we can schedule something.
I'm also hoping to get other remote viewers involved.
You can write to me at Carrie at Project Camelot.tv if you would like to be involved with this.
Remote viewing, in my view, is simply...
One very small portion of the very wide psychic abilities that we have, that we all have.
And so if you're a psychic and you think you know what's What this incident is all about and you think you can contribute to saving lives or warning people.
Or if you happen to have direct contact with Elon Musk and you hear this broadcast, then I would hope that you would contact him on my behalf and warn him that there is a remote possibility that his dragon capsule may be interfered with, sabotaged, then I would hope that you would contact him on my behalf and warn him that there is a remote possibility
Now, one of the things that Dick Algar said about this incoming object is that it will be coming in supersonic speed.
That rules out what we would say conventional aircraft.
It could be something like the crashing of a TR-3B or something of that nature.
Or it could be an incoming meteor.
This was my first impression.
However, even meteors can be shot.
They're used in war and have been used in wartime.
War between various ET races, including the sinking of one portion of Atlantis, was a targeted hit by a targeted meteor.
And I discussed this to some degree and also reference my interview a long, long time ago with Valerie Uvarov, who talked about these installations that had been put in onto Earth to shoot and disperse incoming meteors who talked about these installations that had been put in onto Earth to shoot and One being in China.
These are underground installations.
One being, I believe, in Russia and one being somewhere off the coast or around Florida, southern Florida.
So there may be more, but these were the ones he mentions in his interview with me.
So that is interesting.
What it means to me is that this incident, there is a lot of interference around it.
When I try to contact people who supposedly have remote viewing or other special skills in this regard, they often answer me Skirting the subject, unable to rely or to relate actually on targeting the target themselves.
They go completely off topic, but they simply can't seem to deal with this particular subject.
So that tells me there is a force field around this subject and...
I find it all very interesting.
I think that this kind of a study is very important because we have a lot of people who think that they can predict certain events.
Most of the time, everyone is wrong.
And a lot of times they never admit to being wrong, which I find really fascinating, but it also is an obsession with a certain amount of ego focus on their part.
So, at this point, you know, we're talking that these things could happen on multiple timelines and that they may or may not happen here.
There may be a, maybe this broadcast alone or other broadcasts I've done mentioning this could stop an effort to create a certain kind of event because the publicity is too great.
That kind of thing cannot go on as well.
So, I want to thank everyone for listening today and hope you enjoyed it.
And anyway, have a great weekend.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection