What we have is A series of books that have been written by different authors, and these series of books have gained a following amongst people of the world, and generally these books are fictional books.
The surprising thing of these books are that they have definitely rattled the cages of the elites and caused their authors to be harmed.
Myself thought that the For instance, Robert Ludlam was okay because he was writing fiction.
I'd watch a Bourne movie, for instance, and I'd say, well, if I were the CIA, I'd be probably mad at Robert Ludlam.
But, you know, no such thing as bad publicity, so I figured, you know, he would be looked the other way because it's fiction.
People write off fiction.
They don't take it seriously, generally, and no harm is done.
And lo and behold...
When I went back to actually look at the life story of Robert Lundum, I found out he died under mysterious circumstances.
It looks like he was murdered.
And that totally goes in line with what I would generally think, that these guys don't like any light being shed on them, even if it's in a fictional setting.
So what we have are, I'm going to read the names of these authors who have died under suspicious circumstances.
We have Commander Ian Fleming, the author of the James Bond series.
We have Robert Lundum.
The Jason Bourne series, which were inspired by John Ainsworth Davis, Christopher Crichton's book called The Paladin, which was fiction with Brian Garfield.
You've got Tom Clancy, the Tom Clancy, Jack Ryan series, which includes the 747 crashing into the Capitol in his book Debt of Honor.
You have former CIA director William Colby, who wrote his own memoirs, and he died under mysterious circumstances, definitely murdered.
Michael Crichton, The author of Westworld, Andromeda Strange, Jurassic Park.
He died suddenly after he wrote a book that they seem to be talking about.
Harp chemtrails and stuff like that.
Philip Marshall was a former U.S. government contract drug pilot and wrote a book revealing 9-1-1 was an inside job by the Malin cop.
He died mysteriously by so-called suicide where him and his children were shot, which is really disgusting.
And of course we've got Michael Hastings who at 3 o'clock in the morning just drove into a tree and his car blew up.
So you have a bunch of people who are writing primarily fiction, and a couple of them in there, they're writing non-fiction, dying in suspicious circumstances.
The disturbing thing is how we don't have any concern here, the American people, if they generally see the general outline of a suicide, an accident, a medical death.
Then they don't care.
They just say, oh, that's it.
So what you see in the CSI series of TV shows where the sleuths, you know, Marge Helgenberger and all those cats come upon a crime scene and it looks like a stage scene.
They don't buy into it.
They say a very complex crime scene and then they look through the clues and see the actual truth.
Well, that level of Discernment is not happening in the United States of America.
For instance, William Colby, when he died, I think he was murdered, he was in a sheriff's department jurisdiction.
And even though he was former CIA director, because he had ticked off the establishment, the FBI didn't even show any interest in his death.
So it fell upon the sheriff's department with no experience to try to play Marge Helgenberger, CSI. And of course they botched it.
And of course that means that the murderers got away because the level of discernment you see on the TV CSI shows is not taking place.
In fact, I think the CSI shows are doing a disservice because it's making the American sheeple think that the coroners and the forensics are on the ball when they're not.
So what the American people should do is demand inquests.
When a suspicious death happens or a death that involves the entire country, we should demand an outside agency or outside experts like Cyril Wecht, who's a forensic examiner, famous one who's honest, to look over the facts in a public hearing.
We haven't been doing that.
And so we haven't been doing that.
It's possible that these guys have been picked off.
These authors started revealing too much truth, and in their private lives, they just get whacked.
So it's very disturbing.
The beginning of our title, Murder for Hire, is ironic because some of these authors, that's what they talk about.
You know, James Bond, Jason Bourne are killers being sent on missions for the government, but they're always doing it for a moral reason.
So anyway, my involvement in this is that I befriended John Ainsworth Davis, Christopher Crichton, his pen name, and recently helped his final book get published, the Mountbatten Report New Edition.
And you can see all of this if you go to our YouTube channel.
And the YouTube channel is Dyna McPara number 2.
So it's D-Y-N-M-I-C-P-A-R-A number 2.
So you go to the YouTube channel.
You'll see a video where I start broaching the subject of the authors being killed.
And that will be Jason Bourne and James Bond are born.
You see that video, and that video will also be backed up of what we're discussing tonight.
I'll make another video, which will be constituting the part two of what we just started to talk about.
And, of course, there's also a video where we present the new version of the Mountbatten report.
So going to those videos, you'll capture what we're going to discuss today in a silent documentary setting.
What I mean by that is normally people want an authoritative figure to narrate the video.
People letting me know that and then we are able to start again.
So they just, I'm not sure how much they missed or, you know, hopefully not a lot.
And Tommy, I am monitoring the chat with you here now.
At this moment, what I had asked Mike is that what I want is for him to go into Ludlam, Fleming, and Clancy and let us know how they died and why each death was suspicious.
Roger.
All right.
You have Ian Fleming living an excessive lifestyle of drinking and smoking.
So what they pinned his heart attack death in 1964 on was just hardening of the arteries and that kind of stuff.
But what they don't tell you is that it's very easy to medically induce a heart attack on somebody.
And as Jim Mars came up with this observation, he believes that they knocked him off just before the Warren Commission report came out.
Fleming was a friend of President Kennedy, and he had a worldwide following of the James Bond series.
If they had let him speak to people about the Warren Commission report, he would have said this is bollocks.
This was the group ambush.
This is a whitewash.
Don't believe it.
So they knocked him off so he wouldn't even have a chance to comment on the Warren Commission.
Robert Ludlam got burned in a fire and then died from those complications after he got home from the hospital.
And he had a wife, second wife, who was very cruel to him leading up to these events.
And after this halt took place and he died, she got, you know, through his will, the majority of his earnings.
She died from a quote-unquote drug overdose a few years later.
Right.
She apparently suicided herself.
Right.
That's what I meant earlier.
Yeah.
Right.
It's easy to suicide people.
Very suspicious circumstances.
I just want to add something that's rather...
I just happened to have read about Ludlam, which I found quite suspicious, which was the issue with, he was sitting in his chair in the other room, and he suddenly burst into flames all around him.
And that's what sent him to the hospital, and then he died of those wounds after coming back, I guess, from the hospital.
But nonetheless, what is the flames?
Where do they come from?
All of a sudden, you know, this is quite strange.
Well, they think that she set them on fire.
And the point is that the Sheriff's Department...
That investigated this is not doing any of that due diligence you see on the CSI shows.
And they did no autopsy.
They had no autopsy of him.
Apparently he was cremated and they did no autopsy in that case.
So if they cremate the body, you know that they're hiding the facts.
They don't want a second opinion, forensic opinion, like from a Cyril Wecht or somebody coming in there.
And then you go, okay, well, all right.
But then she dies mysteriously.
Now this is the point...
That I make in the video, which is that it seems to me that somebody put her up to be his wife and then to ruin him and kill him.
And there's a precedent for that.
There's a researcher in England named John Kimber, and he believes that Jackie Onassis, before that she was Jacqueline Bouvier, was a CIA agent.
And she was part of a right-wing family.
Now, right-wing families don't normally marry left-wing husbands, so he's got proof that she was working for Alan Dulles, the CIA director, and was told to marry John F. Kennedy, who was an uprising star in the political world.
To basically keep an eye on him and ruin him.
Now, I don't go as far as John does, where he tries to make her the killer queen, because what that does is gives the right wing what they want, which is, she was mad at Kennedy for his affairs, so it was okay as an angry wife to shoot him.
No, I think she was a CIA agent, but I don't think she physically killed him.
I think she was in on the plot, but she didn't pull the gun on him.
There were multiple shooters in Dealey Plaza.
But the point is that there's art imitating life here, and there's life imitating art.
Because you have, this is just so weird, Roman Polanski, you know, Rosemary's Baby, a very Satanist type guy, making movies in the 60s and 70s, becoming very famous, having a wife, Sharon Tate, very beautiful, we like her very much, daughter of American intelligence officer, They have a baby together, and she decides she's not going to be raising this baby up in this crazy Satanist cult stuff.
They sick the Manson family on her.
And she and other people in her house get stabbed to death.
Anyway, Roman Pulaski is the same guy now who later on gets caught having underage sex with a girl and has to flee the United States and live in Europe for the rest of his life.
He made a movie called Ghostwriter.
And this movie shows a former prime minister of England.
And I hate to give the movie away because a lot of you are not going to see the movie and we don't have time for this, okay?
So I'm going to give the movie away.
We find out that his wife was a CIA agent, and she was told to marry the Prime Minister in college to follow him as he rides up the political ladder.
And lo and behold, guess what do you think happens to him?
He gets shot from a rooftop sniper and killed in the movie, and of course...
She, you know, is revealed as a CIA agent, and he is played by, of course, Pierce Brosnan, former James Bond, from the James Bond movies.
So all of this coming from Roman Polanski is just way too much art-imitating life there.
Okay, are you saying that the movie is called Ghost Rider?
Yeah, it's called Ghost Rider.
Sorry for ruining the ending, but you know, hey.
When is this supposed to be coming out?
It's already came out, 2012.
The movie's already out.
Get it on DVD. Okay, very good.
And that has to do with Fleming.
No, a former prime minister that...
Is unhappy with his reputation, so he hires a ghostwriter to try to rehabilitate his reputation.
Alright, but would you say that the storyline is following one of these men that we're sort of highlighting in this conversation, or someone else's life?
Oh, well, it's just a situation where you have operatives that are joining up with famous political people, And to ruin them, spy on them.
So I guess the closest one would be Robert Ludlum's wife.
Robert Ludlum's wife is the closest analogy to what you see in Ghost Rider.
Okay.
Okay.
But Ian Fleming's in there because of JFK, but that's...
You know, maybe I'm naive here in this regard, but I have trouble believing that Jackie is really implicated.
I want to apologize again here, and I'm not sure why we're having so many problems.
I'm trying to see if we're going live here.
Oh, I hate that when that happens.
All right, let me see what's going on.
No, you're good.
You're good.
You're good on my end.
Why don't you go ahead?
I am going to ask you to talk about what happened with Clancy because, you know, we've kind of gone down this World War II angle and, you know, obviously Clancy comes much later.
So let's see what is it about that that you can tell us in terms of his death.
Well, Clancy, as you know, started being critical of the Obama administration, and prior to that, in his Jack Ryan series of books, he had a 747 crashing into the Capitol building in the book Debt of Honor.
So, Clancy falls in the category of, like, Joan Rivers.
It seems like right now President Obama has a bunch of people around him that if somebody says something, they feel that they have a right to go knock those people off.
Okay.
Kind of nitpicky.
But do you have any – okay, these are the external sorts of evidence, but do you have – is there any other – Is there anyone coming forward?
Is there any suspicious circumstances around his death?
That sort of thing.
Well, the most important thing is the timing of his death.
You know, he said something critical, and next thing you know, he's dying.
Just like with Joan Rivers, saying something critical, next thing you know, he's dying.
So, you got the timing of it, but you have with him, he's not particularly too healthy, but...
Again, no one's demanding an inquest.
No one is demanding a second opinion of another outside forensics guy.
So, you know, before you knock somebody off, you have these in place.
You already have your corrupt, paid-off bot, coroner.
You've already got law enforcement paid off.
So you just have to find where your target is and target the surrounding, we'll call them reality guardians, and make sure that they're on your team before you do the deed.
So there are lessons that we learn from.
So what I wanted to say with a general outline is, okay, one, why are books such a threat?
Books still have legal clout, even though we live in a television age.
Two, if you can't stop the book from being published, they're going to A, discredit the author, B, try to handle the author, C. Kill the author, which is what we're talking about now.
But if that doesn't work, block the publication.
Now, even if you block the publication, you can't block the publication, right?
You can also sabotage the book.
Another thing you can do is buy the book and then destroy them all.
They did that with Jessup's book, The Case for the UFOs.
They just bought all the books and then they burned them.
You can then also publish a counter-disinformation book.
So these are the strategies where you can discredit the author.
The next thing you can do is create a bottleneck at the agent and the publisher level to where the book never gets published.
So that's another strategy.
And then, of course, the last thing is just authors need to beware of what they're doing and saying and just do it.
One of the guys, Marshall, was talking about the book he was going to write Don't talk about it.
If you got something, publish it immediately.
Don't wait, because that's just an open invitation for somebody to whack you.
Now, I want to show you something about sabotaging a book.
Now, the book, generally, in the world of books, has a front cover, which, you know, you win, lose, or draw on the front cover of the book.
Okay, so here's our book right now, and hopefully it's exciting, and you'll want to buy the book.
Okay.
Can you hold that up a little higher?
How am I doing right now?
Okay.
That's better.
Pretty good?
Okay.
It's up a little higher, just so I can see the bottom of the frame.
Yeah, because obviously you're not getting the whole book in the frame.
Okay.
All right.
So there's your book.
Now, that's your strategy.
Your cover of your book is win, lose, or draw on the cover of your book.
Sure.
Generally speaking, there is only two types of book back covers.
Only two types.
And they are...
An author picture.
So they've got a picture of the author.
Authors in this case are John Ainsworth Davis and Amy D. Crichton.
I'm going to show you another book.
Can you tell me, the Montbatten book, did this come out recently?
Yes, we just published it a few days ago.
Are you one of the writers on it as well?
I edited the book.
I helped.
So what happened was, Amy D. Crichton Got the manuscript from John Ainsworth Davis because his book publisher and his book agent were sitting on his book.
They were giving him all kinds of runaround and not publishing his book.
So you see what I'm getting at by the publisher and the book agent who are supposed to be trying to help the author...
We have an agent, in his case, that was deliberately for years now, sitting on everything on his book.
Not getting it promoted, not getting it made into a Hollywood movie, a TV miniseries.
He's actually sitting on the book.
What does that sound like to you?
Sounds like somebody's paying him more money, the agent, to be his handler and to not publish the book.
But I wanted to show you, even when the book gets published, and there was a great battle to get Crichton's book, OPJV, published, there can be sabotage.
So I showed you the back covers.
Now this book is called...
Marilyn, Hitler, and Me by Milton Schumann who helped Creighton get his book, you know, John Ainsworth Davis' book published.
Okay.
You can have on the back cover, you've got a picture of the author because you're trying to get human interest.
So those are your two options, you know, on the front and then the back.
The other option you have is the...
It's like...
Here's another author version.
You could have the...
Endorsements.
Alright, so what you have with the endorsements are a bunch of people saying, hey, this is a great book.
Less tastes great and less filling.
Okay, so here's OPJB, okay, as a paperback book.
Okay.
Alright, so now watch for the horrific card back version.
Here's the hard cover version of the book, right?
Right.
Okay, so we finally got them to publish the book.
Now look at the back cover.
So what happened to the back cover?
Exactly!
What back cover?
Right?
Yeah.
It's sabotaged.
It's sabotaged.
There was a picture, though.
Wasn't there a picture originally?
No.
There was not a picture.
No.
In the other version, there were some semi-lukewarm...
Endorsements.
In fact, there is no endorsement.
They just have some questions.
So now it's blank.
Well, originally it was blank.
So you say, well, maybe they didn't have a picture of him.
No, because you go look at the dust cover.
They had a picture of it.
Okay, now there's something interesting happening again with our video that I'm trying to figure out here.
It looks like it's not working again.
If you bear with me, I'm going to try to move things around here so that we can see there.
Okay, we've got some reason there's, you know, I've got more than one way to look at you.
And so, hold on one second because I want to...
Unbelievable how this is just very...
Something going on with that.
Right.
Well, we know about sabotage.
Yeah.
Hold on one second here because I want to get you on the screen because you're showing pictures.
So there's a reason why we want this on the screen now, right?
Right.
I appreciate that.
So...
Oh, it's definitely a visual.
You've got to see it.
This is just so annoying.
Okay.
Um...
Again, I'm going to try to widen the framing.
Okay.
All right.
Let's try this book thing again.
All right.
So here you've got the hardcover version of the book, right?
And it should have two things in the back.
On the back cover, it should either have a big picture of John Ainsworth Davis, Christopher Crichton, Or it should have endorsements.
Those are the standard book publishing back cover options.
I showed you some other examples.
Ta-da!
Nothing.
Interesting.
So if you're going to like Barnes& Noble, you know, you know, what do you call Walden books or something, and the book gets turned around in the bookshelf, you're not going to catch your eye with this.
Right.
Right?
It doesn't really say much about the front cover either, but it is a front cover.
Sure.
And the point is that it took a lot of doing to get this book published in the first place and Because the book publishing world apparently is under control of the elites.
Because the book has a tremendous power that we talked about at first.
It exists.
It doesn't need electricity to be read.
It exists.
It's a physical object.
So this book, or any book, could be laid down in a court of law on a judge's bench and say, this is our prima facie case here.
This is what we're saying.
And you can look at it and scrutinize it.
And that is the world that used to live before the age of television.
Before the age of television, truth was determined by, in writing, in black and white.
And everybody can then have a fair chance to look at what's been written and say, that's yes, that's no, that's false, that's true.
But on television, the television medium is unaccountable.
Now you could say, well, yes you can.
Well, no you can't.
Who's going to take an hour-long, you know, We'll say documentary, and then make a transcript of it, and then have each line numbered like a deposition, and then go through watching the video, and then hear what the narrator said.
Like James Earl Jones in 2013.
No one is going to take that time to do that.
So we've lost that accountability for reality with the age of television.
And they knew that.
The whole point of television is to give the sheeple this illusion of experiencing something vicariously and then letting that be your truth instead of having a book or a written report But anyway, they fought real hard to get this book finally published, and that was to overcome the handlers that are in the world of book publishing, because several book publishers did not want to publish the book.
Now, what I mean by publish the book is that they will take their money, they'll get some really nice artist to do the cover, and hopefully the back cover, And that takes money.
It's in-house.
And then they're going to typeset the text, and they're going to then buy 10,000, 20,000, 30,000 copies of the book and put it in the bookstores, shotgun them out there, and then people, when they're walking to the bookstore, I want to read that.
So that is the money that they put up front, which they then control to make a bottleneck.
Before the age of television, when the books reigned supreme, the very top of the bottleneck is controlled by a relatively small group of publishers of what books can be published and what cannot be published.
And the benefit of that, though, was truth Could be somewhat trusted.
You'd say, well, wait a minute.
If that book was published, that company's putting serious money behind it.
It can't be BS. It's got to be true.
You see what I mean?
There's a certain kind of vetting that takes place before you get published.
So when the public reads a book, they're going, whoa, it's in a book here.
Got to trust it.
So we lost that by the current day.
Anyone can say anything on the Internet.
And it has a store-bought appearance to it, and it looks like it's been vetted, it's true in everything.
So while more people now can make their voices known, we have a sea of lies and disinformation that you have to sift through, wade through it, in order to find the truth.
But what I wanted to do today with you is talk to you about the battle for the book, which is still underway, because the book still has the power to change the world.
And some of the things that they could do, I listed them, is besides just blocking publication, kill the author, and then, you know, obviously you can't write anymore, but then there's these subtle sabotages.
Okay, hold on one second here.
We've lost sound.
Mike?
That would sustain the book.
Okay, Mike, I'm very sorry.
For some reason, your audio went out temporarily right there, right when you were saying that.
So can you back up like two sentences?
Our video is good, but your audio went out for just, you know, half a minute.
What's going to happen is that if they can't block your publication and they do publish it, I wanted to show some of the things they could do subtly to undermine your book.
I already showed you the back cover, which is horrendous on OPJV, but watch this.
Here's a letter from Winston Churchill in the book.
It's kind of small, isn't it?
See?
It's a very small square.
That picture should be the entire page.
The entire page should be Winston Churchill's letter.
Instead, they make it like half a page.
That diminishes the letter.
Here we've got a letter from Ian Fleming saying, Yeah, we went into Berlin and we busted Borman out.
How are you doing, John, with your piano playing?
You know, it's a personal letter.
From Ian Flumby.
And you see how they diminish it by making it just like half a page?
So you have no human interest because you got a blank, blank, black back cover.
So no human interest, no endorsements.
And then in the middle of the book, you try to sabotage the book by diminishing the key facts.
But is the author...
Now, this is John Anderson, is that right?
John Ainsworth Davis, who has Christopher Crichton as his pen name.
Oh, okay, Christopher Crichton.
Okay, now he's aware, is he aware of these issues, or is he alive?
Sadly, he passed away a year ago, and I'm not happy about it, but he was aware.
Can you tell me when the book was published and when he passed away in relation to that?
Right.
1996, the book was published, right?
And he passed away in 2013, December.
Okay.
Now, I befriended him with the co-author of the last book, The Mountbatten Report, Amy D. Crichton.
That means friend of Crichton.
She wants to try to somewhat have that as her pen name.
Anyway, I helped him.
He obviously was very unhappy with the way the book when we talked to him about OPJB.
So that's Operation James Bond.
We just use that as a slang.
So when we talk about OPJB, he was very down about it because of his book agent.
The book agent, which I'm trying to not say his name.
I don't really care, but just as my co-author said, don't mention his name.
I'm not afraid to get into a fist fight with that jerk.
But anyway, he had so browbeaten him over the years that Jad basically said, oh, no one's interested in OPJB. That's ridiculous.
OPJB shows Ian Fleming doing an actual commando raid.
The whole world wants to see OPJB, but this guy had browbeaten him for so many years that he was forced to go to this lady who lives in Argentina with his final story to publish it, because this guy was not going to publish it.
This guy's a handler.
Okay, so what was the significance of what he had to say in that book?
Good question.
I'm glad you asked that.
The point is that he started in the same safe mode that Ian Fleming and Robert Ludlam started in.
In fact, he actually gave Ludlam the idea for Jason Bourne.
Really?
At the book that he wrote with Brian Garfield.
It's called The Paladin.
And that book was written in 1979.
And it's a fictionalized account of his life story.
So basically...
Of whose life?
Of Fleming's?
John Ainsworth Davis' life.
Oh, John Ainsworth.
Okay.
Okay.
So was John Ainsworth Davis an agent in his early years?
Yes.
So he's a boy assassin.
So you can see right there, he's like a young kid working for Churchill.
So he is the inspiration for Ludlam, who didn't write Jason Bourne until 1980.
And I found a hardback version of this book that has on the back endorsements.
And one of the endorsements is from Ludlam, saying this is awesome, basically.
Um...
This sounds so true to life and everything.
So you can see that Ludlam got the idea for Jason Bourne from the Paladin, John Ainsworth Davis, Christopher Crichton.
Okay, that's awesome information.
Now, can we get hold of this Paladin book?
Is it still in print?
It is.
It's not in print anymore, but you can get it on Amazon.com.
It's easy to get an used copy.
And you can then get the copy with the endorsements on back.
I've got some right here.
You can see, that's a good faith effort.
If you're not going to put a picture of somebody, in this case, he wanted to stay fictional, you know what I mean?
He didn't want to have his identity given away.
So in 79, you put the endorsements in the back of the book.
But by 1996, when he wrote OPJB... He's coming out of the cold and saying, I am Christopher Crichton, John Ainsworth Davis.
This really did happen, and it's a non-fiction account.
We went into Berlin, busted Martin Borman out, and we did it for the Swiss bank accounts to help rebuild England.
What happened is, a lot of people attacked him, not only for OPJB, they attacked him primarily because of the Paladin.
The Paladin...
It's about 25% fiction intermingled with 75% truth by Brian Garfield.
So when I was writing my book, which is, you know, there's a shameless plug here, okay?
Shoot me.
Okay, shoot me.
Here's my shameless plug.
When I wrote my book, James Bond is Real, I went and contacted Brian Garfield to...
Find out, okay, Brian, how much of this is your words and how much of this is Jad's words?
And he gave me a long song and dance, and I didn't like the response.
I mean, I wanted to go itemize.
Here's the events.
Blew up the Judge submarine.
Did he parachute into the water, or what did he do?
I was going to itemize it, and then you, Brian Garfield, you just come back and tell us what did you make up.
To sexify it, you know, make it more sexy, right?
And Brian wouldn't do that.
But also, Brian either didn't refuse to do that or he got confused because of two issues here.
I want to know what he said, what she said.
What did Brian Garfield add?
What did Jad say?
I didn't say whether it was true or not.
I first thing want to know what one person said and what the other person added.
But Garfield would go back, and you can see it in the video, because I've got the letter there, and say, well, I couldn't tell what's true or what isn't.
I wasn't asking him for whether it was true or not.
I first want to know what Jad is saying is true, and then what we know that you added.
The point is, we don't have to do that anymore.
We can see what the difference is between the Paladin and what Jad really said now, because he finally set the record straight.
You know, in the Mountbatten Report.
Mountbatten Report is basically the paladin without the fiction.
And so what I did was I made a video where I compare the two books, right?
And that way you can see the events the way I wanted to do it with Garfield and say, okay, he did this, okay, he didn't do that.
And I'll tell you one right now is he did not parachute into the water.
To link up with the Dutch submarine.
He landed on a seaplane.
And then through grenades in the water, the submarine surfaces, he gets in the submarine, plants the bombs.
That's not very sexy, right?
So what you see Garfield doing is he has him parachuting in to the water, which is very dangerous, exciting.
You could easily die if you don't get that parachute off you.
You know, you're going to land on top of you and drown.
But the point is that Garfield specified a lot of things and gave people like Nigel West, Rupert Allison, the excuse to attack Jad, you know, in general, which is dishonest.
But Paladin, wasn't the book Paladin supposed to be fiction, right?
Yeah.
Okay.
It's fiction based on truth.
Right.
Okay.
And was it ever made into a movie, that particular book?
Not yet.
Because it sounds like a great movie subject.
Right.
And guess who is very good at making movies out of his books?
Brian Garfield, right?
Oh, yeah.
Remember that movie he had, Deaf Sentence, I think it was, with Kelly Preston?
I loved Kelly Preston.
Right?
So you had Kevin Bacon in that movie.
So if you got Kevin Bacon, you connect with everybody, right?
Six degrees of Kevin Bacon, right?
You know, you do the connect everybody.
Kevin Bacon, you can connect Kevin Bacon.
You got John Wayne can be connected to Daniel Craig.
It's less than six moves because Kevin Bacon's made so many movies with so many people.
You can just segue from Kevin Bacon into anybody, but it's a little joke.
Okay, but you're kind of releasing this book, Montbatten, recently, right?
And it's covering this sort of arena, and you're saying that Ainsworth died.
I had to outflank Ainsworth Davis's...
Okay, but at this point, are you saying to me that somebody's making this movie, or are you saying that it's something that could happen?
Well, I can say this now.
It's in the Mountbatten Report intro.
Basically, his agent signed a deal.
For like $4,000 for the Paladin to be...
Oops, I shouldn't have said it.
Anyway, the Paladin to be made into a movie.
And that hasn't materialized.
Okay, not yet.
I don't think it's going to.
I think it's just a token number, you know, small change to throw to the poor guy.
He's 87 years old.
To give the guy some false hope.
And I don't think they had any intention of really making it into a miniseries movie.
The Paladin?
Seriously, why?
If it's such a good, it sounds like a great, you know.
Well, because theoretically somebody could then say, wait a minute, let me go talk to Brian Garfield.
Brian?
Which part of this is your make-believe and which part is it true?
And if enough people requested it, he might have to come clean.
But you don't need to now because we already know what the truth is and can differentiate it.
The elites don't want this to be known because there's still too much truth.
Okay, what don't they want to know?
I mean, what specifically?
I mean, you know, whether somebody parachutes onto...
Yeah, I'm going to give you specifics.
Okay.
The Paladin shows that Hitler...
We had to be suckered into war against America by Pearl Harbor.
We knew the Japanese codes and the German codes.
We baited the Japanese to come attack Pearl Harbor.
We even saw them coming with a Dutch submarine.
We murdered the Dutch submarine crew.
We murdered two agents, signals agents, later to keep the Pearl Harbor lie going because it was a noble lie.
We needed it to get America involved in the war.
That's very embarrassing.
The book also shows – I hate to give it away, but it was serious stuff.
Anyway – An Irish U-boat base.
The Irish government actually built an underground U-boat base so that German U-boats could then leave Ireland to sink merchant ships to try to bring England to their knees.
JAD helped destroy that base.
That's very embarrassing.
You have the amphibious raid of Dieppe in 1942.
Where you have America clamoring to land, invade, and get this war over with.
Churchill and other wiser heads say, we're not ready yet.
If we try to land right now, we're going to need a port, and ports are heavily defended.
It's going to be a disaster.
So what they did was, is they sent Jad over to Ireland, and they gave the details of the Dieppe raid, the time and place and location, obviously, of where the landing's going to take place.
And 3,000 Canadians got slaughtered at Dieppe, just so that the American allies could say that it's too early to try to invade, and at the same time, Show the Russians that we're doing all we can to relieve pressure over there in the west on you, in the east.
And, of course, to set up for the final knockout punch, which is you have to get the Germans believing Jad is trustworthy.
So what you have happening at the final knockout punch...
Is Jad going to France again and telling them that we're going to land at Pas-de-Calais.
I got a D in French class.
Anyway, Pas-de-Calais is north of Normandy.
And we successfully...
He tricked the Germans into thinking that we're going to land there by dummy bases, dummy tanks, dummy aircraft that their reconnaissance flights are seeing, all kinds of stuff.
And people like Jad going over there and trying to con them into thinking we're landing in Normandy.
So it's a double lie.
He went over there to try to tell them we're landing in Normandy, and they said, no, you're lying to us.
It's a double whammy there.
So we did all this kind of behind-the-scenes backstabbing, and it succeeded with the help of William Canaris, the leader of the German intelligence agency, kind of winked and said, yeah, I really don't think you're a traitor, John, but I'm going to pass this up the chain of command anyway.
Because he couldn't just say, Johann, you know, that's German for John, I'm really on your side.
You know, I think Hitler is an evil jerk.
You know, I'm trying to help you.
Because his office is probably bugged.
And that's what happened to Admiral Canaris.
Eventually, Hitler got tired of him, arrested him.
The SS took over, that's the Gestapo, took over intelligence jobs from, you know, jobs, you know, From the Ab War.
And they put Canaris in a concentration camp and hung the guy naked.
The guy's a real hero.
He was an anti-Nazi.
He stayed on the job to help the Allies.
But he couldn't just broadcast it.
Right.
I get it.
Okay, but so what is it?
Is it this information they don't want out there?
I mean, you know.
Right.
Because it then will set the stage for the final story of Jad.
Which, not the final, but the final World War II story is OPJB. OPJB is saying, look, in 1945, this same guy that was doing all these shenanigans busted Martin Borman out for the tune of at least $1 billion, and then for people to put two and two together like we have, which is, how did England get the nuclear bomb in seven years after the end of World War II if they're broke?
They're broke.
No one's got food.
They're starving over there in England.
Where does $100 million come from to create an atomic bomb for England?
So you see what starts to unravel.
If one part of the truth, you get your door opened and your foot in there, you can start opening the door even more and more, and the elites don't want that to happen.
And one of those door openings would be then, hey, Ian Fleming was the real deal.
We better go back and see what Ian Fleming was writing in code in his James Bond novels, because Ian Fleming actually went on missions.
Now, I have no problem with it, but the American people do.
Unless a guy is actually shooting a gun and seducing the girl and blowing the base up, they don't think he's real.
That's the way the American people are.
They think that kinetics is the only way to be valid.
and so they're not satisfied that Ian Fleming was planning these missions and having other better men do it.
So they're not happy with that.
So that's how they can dismiss everything he says, which is illogical, but that's the American people, that's the way they are.
But when we have proof that Ian Fleming went on missions, now what your excuse is.
He actually went on missions, did things as James Bond.
Now where's your excuse, American sheeple?
You don't have the excuse anymore.
He actually did things.
Okay, but within the fact that he actually did things, as you call it, what you're saying, though, is that...
What does that do to his image?
What does that do to revealing the fact that there's actually truth in his books?
Isn't that the road you're going down?
That is the road, but if you don't have, with the American people, if you don't have him doing anything, then he thinks it's BS. It's BS when he's a paid enforcer, and he's having men do it in real life.
Okay, but the bottom line, just to drill down here, is to say that what you're trying to say here is that if the American people knew, and, well, the rest of the world for that matter, that Ian Fleming was the real thing, Then they have to look closer at the content in the books and what was being revealed there as actually being more true than fiction.
Is that...
Right.
And they have to decode the book.
Right.
Just like what you had to do with the paladin until, you know, the Mountbatten report came out.
You'd have to kind of go, well, that looks a little too fishy.
You know, like I said with the parachute into the sea thing, I wouldn't want to do it.
It's very dangerous.
It seems excessive.
Right.
If you have a flying boat, if you have a seaplane, just land the dang thing on the water and it's safer.
So, you know, you want to differentiate these details and get to the bottom line.
And the Mountbatten report, it rings true because it's not as sensational as the Paladin.
It's still extremely exciting, but it's true.
For the people listening, are you saying that this Mountbatten report that you kind of participated in as an editor...
theory, right?
Right.
It does.
And so for people that want to reference one book against the other and start to go down the same, a similar trail, the evidence within the Mountbatten book, does that come from Ainsworth or does it come from a variety of sources?
It comes originally from Ainsworth, but then in our margins, we, you know, footnote things and we try to help them out.
For instance, he says he took his seaplane back to England, but first had to land at Wake Island and then go to Pearl Harbor and then fly to San Francisco.
You see what I mean?
He had to take hops to refuel.
I found that during the Battle of Wake Island that there was a clipper seaplane landed at that time and took off.
So what I'm trying to do is find corroborating evidence of what Ainsworth Davis says with physical facts.
And then I put it in the little footnotes.
I see.
For instance, like he said that the Dutch submarine intercepted the Japanese fleet 300 miles southeast of Tenkin Island in the Curials.
I then go to my DAF logic map program online.
I draw the little points and then I measure the distance and then I say Dutch submarine 10 miles an hour on the surface.
I do a calculation and they had seven days to go the distance and So it's feasible.
In other words, I'm checking the basic validity facts of what he's saying to see that it's true, and then I'll put in little footnotes for people to read later as corroborating evidence.
Okay, let me ask you, because in the beginning of this, and I sincerely hope that it was all recorded, you were talking about a number of people who have died.
You weren't just talking only about Clancy, Fleming, and Ludlam, who are all mentioned in our title here.
But you actually mentioned a number of others, including Marshall.
And I'm not sure what...
Marshall is the last name for who?
Yeah, he's a guy who is a contract pilot.
I've got to bring his name up here.
He was a pilot for drug runners, for the U.S. government.
So he's written a book about 9-1-1 and making the connection that basically they wanted this to happen and working with the Saudis and everything.
But he had another book that he was writing.
And he told everyone about it, and he should have just went ahead and published it.
Okay, but the other book was about what?
The connection between the U.S. government and the 9-1-1 attacks.
His name is Philip Marshall.
So he's showing it's an inside job.
How did he die?
He was suicided.
Okay.
Which is similar to this guy, I need to add him to my list, that wrote, again, he didn't do it, he started telling people about it, the video documentary or drama, dramatary, called The Gray State, or Gray Nation.
Oh, you're kidding.
Okay.
Yeah.
That guy...
He was suicided, supposedly, by shooting his wife and his daughter and himself.
A clean shot to the head and everything was nice and clean and neat and everybody was laid down perfectly.
I mean, it's complete nonsense.
Complete nonsense.
So he's suicided, just like Philip Marshall.
Philip Marshall was found...
This is a classic suiciding.
And none of these sleuths, you know, in local law enforcement are up to the job, you know.
And Mark Helgenberger and those guys and gals are not coming down to help them either because the establishment wants this issue.
to be wrapped up.
And, oh, he just committed suicide.
Sure.
You know.
Okay.
So the warning is we, the authors, need to get our act together.
Absolutely.
Well, so do the comedians.
So do the, actually, lately, of course, the bankers, needless to say.
And what's happened lately, which is, I'm told, a new wave, which is the astronomers.
So right now, the astronomers, I don't know if you've gone down that road at all, but are starting to die.
Mysterious.
And that is, in theory, because of some incoming body that they may have knowledge of, and maybe some other things as well.
And of course we all know about the astrobiologists, microbiologists, all of that.
Right, but what I'm trying to say is that my fourth point, authors beware, do it.
We also need to have what I call bond shield.
We need to get some people...
In the world of intelligence that we can trust, that's like an oxymoron in itself, but there are counterintelligence methods we need.
The people that need the protection need to learn some of this field craft, right, to protect themselves.
And there needs to be a team of people, I call it Bond Shield, that could descend upon somebody.
Let's say, what was it called, Gray State or whatever?
But before he puts his movie out, these people need to descend upon his life and protect him for a couple months.
During the high stress danger period and make sure he doesn't create patterns and regularity and just make sure no jerk can come into his house and set up a suicide.
Yeah, absolutely.
Okay, so I call that bond shield.
But one thing that all these people can do right now, and I'm doing it with you right now, I can tell you I will never commit suicide.
I am telling you right now, everybody that's trying to expose the truth, they need to write a statement and put it on their website and say, I will never commit suicide.
If you find me that looks like I was suicided, I did not do it.
You demand that you get an inquest.
You do not buy into any of this BS that they set up.
You demand...
That somebody like Cyril Wecht come in and look at my body?
Because I didn't commit suicide.
Ever.
I'm going to go down fighting.
Right.
Right?
So what I'm saying to the authors is they need to stop being in this la-la land that just because they're writing fiction that they're safe.
That's the real message of this whole show tonight.
Yeah, no, that's significant because, you know, that has long been the refuge of people that want to tell the truth.
And I could name a number of...
authors that are still alive out there who are writing, uh, you know, various novels and thinking that they, they are getting away with it.
Um, it may be a short leash in, in essence.
Uh, certainly Tom Clancy had a good run of it.
Um.
Right.
Can you say a little more about, you know, because he's the most, I guess, I think he's the most recent, you know, because that was highly suspicious.
Well, no, Ludlam is recent.
Ludlam, you know, just died in 2001.
So, you know, Ludlam and Clancy are the most recent.
Okay, but I thought Clancy died recently.
Yeah, he did, really recently.
Yeah, just a couple years ago.
Well, the point is, he's a techno-thriller.
And Ludlam is like a spy, assassin thriller, so there's a genre there, right?
Sure.
But the point is that...
But what do you think of Clancy's death in, you know, I mean, I know you've given a couple of reasons why he got on the bad side, for example, in theory, of Obama, I guess you're saying, right?
Right, but I wanted to talk to you about where these guys get their inspiration from.
Generally speaking, there's a symbiotic relationship between art and life.
And that's why I tried to use the ghostwriter as an example.
Basically, Hollywood is getting fed either by revelation of method or just plain old disinformation or just, you know, whatever the terror that they intend to invoke upon us.
But there is a connection between the evil elites feeding plot lines and story lines to people like Clancy and Ludlam in a kind of symbiotic relationship.
So John Gardner wrote James Bond novels after Ian Fleming died.
And I've got evidence, and you see the web, go to the YouTube channel, where you can see that Gardner's talking to the CIA and getting ideas that seem to be predating 9-1-1.
So Gardner has got an airplane, a 747, blowing up with VIPs, for example.
He's got in The Man from Barbarossa, he's got a phony trial of Nazi war criminals, and they're all played by actors.
That's Sandy Hook.
So John Gardner is living in northern Virginia.
Hello.
And he's writing these stories.
So the idea is that Tom Clancy is very tight with the U.S. military, and so he's getting story ideas.
Of things that they're going to basically instigate later is the implication.
Okay.
But why Clancy had, you know, because maybe this is true of all of them, but his exposure was for so long.
You know, I mean, it's just strange.
I'm going to try to explain that to you because he's not threatening.
Yeah, he's on the reservation.
He's on the reservation.
For a very long time, most of his life.
He's a golden boy in their world, right?
Right, because he's not challenging the hive.
He's telling everyone, stay in the hive, behave, don't question anything.
You know, rah-rah, U.S. military, wear the cap with the USS New Jersey, whatever.
He's very good.
He's saying to the Hivesters...
Join the U.S. military, be a hero, and it's good.
And he doesn't leave that fold very much.
You know, like in Clear and Present Danger, he alludes to a little government corruption there reaching the White House through a drug war, right?
But he always does it in a way that brings you back to at least a segment of the hive back to the U.S. military.
But if you stray too far out and you lose your sponsor...
You could get whacked.
Right.
So, in the case of, you know, I think Robert Ludlum, I watch his movies and read a couple of his books, and I'm surprised that he didn't get whacked sooner.
Because you'll see in that BBC story, no, Daily Telegraph story from his cousin, that he was in Montana and somebody threatened him.
Right.
In Montana earlier, before the gold-digging wife started setting him on fire and stuff like that.
So, you know, it seems like that he did piss off the people over there at Langley.
Because, you know, even if he has the guy turn into a good guy, which is what Jason Bourne does, you still have a bunch of scoundrels in the CIA. Right.
So the idea is that you try to give them a bone, right, to make it look like just a few bad apples in the CIA. Yes, always, always.
The last thing they want is a group conspiracy.
Right, they don't want the whole bureaucracy behind it.
Where the organization, the bureaucracy, is clearly choosing to do these evil things.
If you pitch it like that, and like I said, John Gardner says nice things about the CIA in his books.
You know, his James Bond continuation stories.
But you got, at the end of the man from Barbarossa, get this, he's got a 747 painted to look like a British Airways airliner.
And it's going to fly to Washington, D.C. with a nuclear bomb and blow up.
He's writing this in 1991.
He lives in Northern Virginia, so where the hell do you think he gets these ideas from?
Yeah, I mean, no doubt about it.
But I am curious because, you know, just to bring this up to date a bit, do you see like a growing list that is like an escalation on this level?
It is.
I think you pointed out an escalation that is empowered by the internet that smart people are decoding these books that were previously protected by fiction and then they're spreading the word out and the books are being decoded and now the protection of the authors is gone.
But that's what the authors always wanted anyway.
Basically, in old days, you could not just criticize the king off of his head, right?
So, in art, you embed the message.
And that's what you have with Mona Lisa, right?
The most famous artwork, right, is Mona Lisa.
Right.
Right?
What is the Mona Lisa supposed to be?
It's supposedly, right, it's the mistress of some politician.
Right?
So, the idea is that you embed your message in your art.
And hope that the sheeple can decode it without letting the evil ones know that it's being decoded.
Right.
Well, I mean, the game is up in that regard.
It's not a pretty sight.
I mean, we've just got to get our guards up.
You know, Mr.
Sulu put the shields up.
Authors doing this have got to be ready for when they get decoded that they're going to become targets.
Okay, well, along those lines, would you happen to have, and maybe we don't want to say the list, but is it possible that you have a list, a short list or whatever, of the people that are writing out there in various genres that may be kind of the people that are writing out there in various genres that Yeah.
Yeah.
Right.
I don't really you're right.
I don't want to advertise it.
I'd want to contact them privately.
Okay.
I think it's fair to say that evil people listening to this Sure.
You jerks, you scum that aren't following your constitutional oath to protect the U.S. Constitution and we the people.
Right.
You jerks if you're listening to this.
It's fair to say that I'm not giving away any operational secrets to say we'd contact them privately.
Yeah, okay.
But there are definitely people out there, authors out there that you would be aware of, right?
Yes, but not as many as there once was.
I'm afraid that some of these guys are just taking the series, which is a ka-ching, cash-earning series, and they're just continuing it and just feeding basically crap.
Yeah, well, I mean, I've recently...
A couple of the authors that have continued for James Bond, you know, Ian Fleming, I read a couple of them.
They were so bad, I couldn't even finish them.
Yeah, I bet.
You know, the...
They're not saying a damn thing.
They're just doing the same formula, bond meets girl, done covers plot.
Telling the party line is what I call it.
Okay, well, yeah, because I've also written, I mean, written, I've actually read some books recently that could have had some interesting twists to them.
Start out interesting and then they peter out.
Have you seen that?
Yeah, they check it down, yes.
Like they get too close.
They get kind of close to the root of something.
And then somehow, I guess just to stay alive, they now twist their plots into, you know, la-la land, as you call it.
Nice, tidy little box where just a few bad apples.
But a few bad apples is a good place to go.
You start off revealing a conspiracy and just wrap it up with a few bad apples.
I don't do that.
I mean, if you go to a YouTube channel where it's about my channel, you'll see that I've got some James Bond fiction.
I've got a story, Masquerade, Everything is Not What It Appears.
In that one, I tackle the Indian-Pakistan War possibility.
I've got another one called The Point of Gravity, where I just go straight into the Nazi flying saucer anti-gravity craft thing.
I just have Bond go down to South America and find the underground bases.
So I don't shy away from any of that stuff, and I do it without asking for money, because it's fan fiction, so they can't get me that way.
But the problem is that if you ask for money, then the people owning the brand names, you know, James Bond 007, the Jason Bourne series, those people are not going to attack the establishment, even if they knew that that was the mandate from Ian Fleming and Robert Ludlam.
To do a public service and to expose these evil plots, the people wanting the gravy train to continue are not empowering the continuation authors to write that way dangerously at all.
They're just writing fluff.
Like the one book, Carte Blanche by Deaver, is a continuation Bond novel.
Just awful.
I couldn't even finish it.
It was so terrible.
It's just not saying anything.
Sorry I had to put it out there.
I don't believe in criticizing something unless you do better.
So I've told people, look, I think I've done better.
I believe I've stayed true to Ian Fleming's intent.
And you can read my fan fiction on the website that I told you to go to from the YouTube channel.
Read it for yourself.
Maybe I'm full of it.
I'm not a writer.
Maybe I suck, whatever.
But at least I try to do better and not just criticize.
Right.
No, absolutely.
All right.
Well, are there any other people that we haven't actually mentioned here that perhaps we should in terms of authors who are going down a good road who may actually have already passed on, but we want to draw attention to them, their books, and the way they died?
Oh, yeah.
Well, oh no, not The Way They Died.
I was going to tell you, go read Joseph Farrell, but he's still alive.
But he's non-fiction.
So he courageously tries to decode what's going on.
Okay, but no, I'm talking about the reason I bring up The Way They Died is because if The Way They Died is suspicious, then you want to be able to draw people's attention to So that, in essence, people can see their books, can find the truth that's written in them that they ended up getting killed over.
Well, I'm going to make a video on this guy, former CIA director William Colby.
He was in the OSS. He parachuted behind enemy lines.
So he's a stud.
He's a hero.
He led people in battle.
Then he becomes...
He's a CIA director.
There's a lot of dirty deeds being done by the CIA. And this guy saves that bureaucracy.
He reveals the dirt and says we just need to reform the agency.
I think during the 70s we should have shut the thing down.
We still need to shut the CIA down.
But he saves the organization.
Do you know what they do to thank this guy?
They murder him.
So he's in retirement.
He's working on a sailboat.
He's tired.
He goes back to his house, waters his plants, and he's going to have a clam dinner.
They yank this guy out of his clam dinner and, you know, knock him out.
They set it up that looks like he went on a canoe ride in the middle of the dark night.
Not going to happen.
They can't find his body.
A week later, his body shows up in the water by where they found his canoe half filled in sand.
A canoe, if it's set loose, is not going to overturn and fill itself up with sand.
That's them planting the canoe and pouring sand in the canoe to put it on that beach so stupid sheriff's department can find it.
This is all in Zalen Grant's webpage, who is a friend of Colby.
We're decomposing the lack of investigation into his death.
So you can go see Zalen Grant's webpage on this.
I'm going to make a video of it.
But anyway, a week later, his body is found.
Get this.
It looks like it hasn't been in the water very long.
Well, because it wasn't.
Now here's the thing that people don't understand.
I didn't understand until I read it.
What's the significance of it?
Basically, they killed him and kept him dead for a week.
So his internal organs would decay.
So then a week later, they put him back in the water so that there would be no forensic timeline.
You understand?
This is subtle stuff that only somebody really devious, like a CIA assassin...
Would pull this stunt that they would know how to beat the forensic guys.
That they needed to have him die and deteriorate on the inside for a week.
Then they put him back in the water.
Because people will say, why don't you just knock him over the head, kill him, and then have him go in the water.
Well, then that would show you the time of death.
He would bloat the body.
You understand what I'm saying?
This is guilty demeanor.
This is fingerprints that the guy was totally murdered.
Okay, so what I'm going to do now...
So what do we need to do?
We need to go back and find William Colby's memoirs and read his memoirs and see what he did to possibly piss these guys off.
Exactly.
Absolutely.
Because he's a hero.
I know, but what about the guy who got killed in...
Wasn't he...
Was he head of the CIA or FBI who got killed in one of the buildings in 9-11?
Yeah, he was a security guy.
Yeah, at the top floor.
Not a security guy, but he was very well known.
He was counterintelligence or something.
Yeah, but he was security.
He was supposed to be in charge of security.
That guy.
No, I'm talking about a guy who was a member of the intelligence agencies.
Yeah, well you have to kind of narrow it down.
Okay, I can't remember his name.
It's notorious.
Robert, I think his name is Robert, oh God, I don't know, I forget his last name.
Okay, maybe someone in the chat will remember.
No, but you've got the right idea.
All of these events need to be looked at from a fresh angle that there was an ulterior motive that, you know, somebody else was being murdered in the process of killing the group.
So you kill the group, but the real target was good old, you know...
Nineveh, Jonah and the whale.
So Jonah gets on this fishing boat, and these guys say, wait a minute, God's mad at you.
Why are you on our fishing boat?
And they go, oh please, let me be on your boat.
I don't think this is going to go well.
So you know what happens?
The boat gets racked by the storms, and God's mad at you.
So they kick Jonah out of the boat.
And he gets swallowed by the whale, and he gets his butt planted to go preach to Nineveh.
So I try to put a little humor in this.
The point is that the person that you're mad at may not be the group that's been assassinated and whacked.
It could be good old Jonah in the middle of the group that's being...
You know, targeted.
So, you have that with the two drug enforcement agencies, guys, on Pan Am Flight 103 that blew up over Lockerbie, Scotland.
The legend is that those two guys had some whistleblower stuff.
Okay, I don't want to say McAfee, one of the guys, but you just go Pan Am 103, drug agents.
So the point of the matter is, there is not safety numbers.
If you're a controversial person, like a politician, oh my god, do not fly in a frickin' airplane.
Exactly.
Well, tell that to the, you know, Flight 370.
Right.
The scientists on Flight 370 as well.
Exactly.
And the point is, an airplane can be easily accidented.
There's no safety in numbers.
And tell that to SEAL Team 6, who supposedly killed Obama, I mean Bin Laden, Osama, who had been dead since 2001.
One, and everyone knows it, but you had to get rid of them.
I think they killed a relative of Bin Laden.
It was a Bin Laden relative.
Whoever.
But the point of the matter is that to close up the loose ends, remember, tidy the box at the end.
Nonsense.
You might get whacked.
So you don't want to work for these guys.
That's for sure.
But also you don't want to be, if you're a controversial person, flying on airplanes anymore when you have to.
Because then you've got, you know, a guy in Minnesota, Whelstone.
Which angers me because they killed his wife and I believe his daughter too.
If you are an evil guy and you feel that Satan's your guy and you're following Lucifer, make your case.
Say you're going to get the money and the babes and the fortune and the fame.
Make your case and say, that's what you need to do, sheeple.
Be one of us.
But leave the innocent people out of it.
If you can't make your case and win people over, don't be murdering women and children.
You know, that just disgusts me.
You know, if you don't like Paul Wellstone, you go after him.
But you leave the women and children, but they don't even have that sense of honor.
Because if you look at the JFK assassination, you see Jackie and Nellie Connelly are wearing pink on the day of the assassination.
That's like, do not shoot us.
Could you be more obvious?
Maybe Blaze Orange?
They're in the limousine, and they're creating a huge contrast to help the shooters shoot John F. Kennedy and not shoot them.
Because I think in 1963, I believe the evil elite Illuminati, they did know...
That if Jackie Kennedy gets killed, the whole public's going to come unglued.
They're going to demand action.
John F. Kennedy gets killed, he's a womanizer.
People are envious of his good looks and fame.
You know what I mean?
But if Jackie Kennedy gets killed...
Gloves come off.
Because us men that adore women, we're going to get pissed.
So I think even back in 63, there was a little bit of decency not to shoot the women.
But today, they're blowing women up.
They're shooting them.
And to me, that's disgusting.
So if some evil person's listening to this broadcast, I mean, be a man and stop doing it.
If you don't like somebody as a whistleblower, you go after them.
You leave the women and children alone, or else that means that your point of view sucks, and you know it sucks, and it's wrong.
Because if you have to kill women and children, then you know that you're wrong.
If you've got a case, make your case.
Win people over to evil on the merits.
But as for me and my house, we're going to serve the Lord.
I believe in what He says is truth, and I don't kill women and children.
I hear you.
Okay, well, what I'd like to do here is actually, I'm trying here to get onto the chat It's not easy because on my computer I can't see it.
So I'm trying to get onto another computer so that I can actually view the chat.
I got it back.
So that we can try to go down this road and see what the questions are.
My main point is that fiction isn't going to necessarily protect you, but I'm telling everybody to start looking at fiction with new eyes.
And I'll give credit where credit's due.
So you've got to give a lot of credit to the Da Vinci Code guy for starting this trend.
I'm not saying I buy into Da Vinci Code, but his methodology is true.
That Leonardo Da Vinci did embed messages, social commentary in his art.
That's a fact.
Doesn't mean that Jesus married Mary Magdalene or whatever they're trying to say.
You've got to differentiate the truth from the falsehood here, but I'm giving credit for credit.
There's a lot of validity to all of that.
It is interesting.
I just read another book that actually a whistleblower recommended that I read of this guy's and maybe more about that at some later date.
Or if you want some comic relief, I would find the book called Fair Game by that beautiful, lovely Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson.
And there will be entire pages of the book.
Yeah, there will be entire pages of the book redacted.
So I brought my black pen for that here.
Okay, so they redacted.
There's entire pages.
The entire page is redacted.
Just black, black, black.
Turn the page.
Black, black, black, black.
Black, black.
Turn the page.
Black, black.
So the idea is if you're an intelligence agent and you retire, if you want to stay in their good graces, you let them see the book manuscript and then let them have a chance to take their felt pen to it and redact it.
So that's probably why her life is not in danger.
Maybe it is, but I'm just saying that other books that don't give them that chance, those authors end up being killed or put on the run.
There was two guys that wrote exposés in the CIA, and they went on the run.
One of them went to Cuba, inside the company, that guy.
There's a very interesting book that's been written about all of that.
At this moment, there's no way for me to get into the chat.
I have tried.
I'm very sorry, you guys, because I love to get your questions.
I love to run them by.
Mike can have him answer them, but logistics this evening are just not with us.
So I'm going to have to pass on that.
Mike, I guess we're going to have to wind this down.
I'm holding my breath here, hoping that everything has still been working.
Well, I've got more to talk about if you want to talk about it.
The point is that the details of the book We haven't even got to too much of the details because you first have to get to the first barrier, which is the messenger level.
So I would call the three levels are the messenger, the message, and then the message.
So once you get the message coded, then you've got to get to the message.
Okay, I'm going to let you do that.
If you want to hold on one minute, I've got to stop this.
I've got to save it so we don't lose it.
And then we're going to start again.
I'm going to try to look at the chat since we're going to do that.
And we won't keep everyone too much longer because I've learned that about two hours is max.
And we've had a lot of delays here that people are going to be kind of fatigued over.
So at this moment, we'll come back to you in just a minute, okay?
Alright, sounds good.
Hold my horses.
We're just going live here.
We just want to make sure to get you framed and...
And whatever is going on with this crazy Skype thing.
So, again, I did glance really quickly on this very short break to the Skype to see if we could see if there were any questions in there.
I did notice Umberto Eco is mentioned as such an author that might have been putting some truth into his books.
I have read some of his work.
So what do you think about that one just before you go into this area?
Well, my thinking is messenger, message, and then the masses.
And the messenger has to know that if his book finally gets decoded, he's at risk.
So the polite thing to do would be contact him, whoever or she, first and say, look, I want to field strip your writing and tell people what it is.
Are you ready for that?
Are you ready for personal attack?
First thing they'll try to do is destroy your credibility, your reputation.
Now, Colby is on a video on the Franklin controversy, the pedophile ring.
If you watch that documentary that wasn't shown on television, Colby is interviewed.
And Colby says, the first thing you're going to try to do is destroy your reputation.
And if that doesn't work, they'll kill you.
So you can see that.
I'm going to put that in my next video, a little clip from William Colby.
But the point is, the messenger has to be protected.
And the messenger can't be naive about that.
The message then, let's go to that.
You've got to realize that when you get your message out, it doesn't take much to have your message get disqualified from the hive.
For instance, if somebody in the mainstream media asked me, Mike, what's your opinion about this ISIS crisis?
I'd say, well, the first thing we need to do is disband the CIA because they don't want creating groups like ISIS. And then we can go seal the border between Syria and Iraq and then exterminate all these nihilists.
And then I would never be asked on TV ever again because the hive minders don't want the sheeple to know this.
So the message that you've got, you know it could be disqualified, and that means that your book publishers will probably not put money into your book.
So what you need to do is self-publish your book.
There are ways to do that that don't cost any money.
And it's print-on-demand.
So what you do there is put your book together, get it out there, protect yourself, and don't pull any punches because, you know, you're not going to gain any favor from the mainstream media by, you know, being soft on the truth.
Because once they catch whiff that you're threading the hive...
You're disqualified.
Then the next thing is the masses, the people that read these books Instead of watching television, what you need to do in your message is ask them to do something.
I always said this about the so-called Occupy movement.
They're not asking for anything.
They're just putting signs up basically saying, Wall Street, you're rich, and I'm pissed off that I'm not rich too.
That's not what you need to be saying.
You need to have on your sign...
Disband the Federal Reserve.
Disband the CIA. Make it illegal to be a member of any secret society.
You know, bring back the 17th Amendment.
I mean, bring it back.
It's bad.
You know, you need to ask for something tangible.
I think most of your people, you know, your conspiratologists, their main mistake is at the end of their message, they don't ask you to do anything.
They just kind of come off like, you know, curse the darkness.
You know, Alec Jones does that.
He curses the darkness too much.
Right.
You need to, at the end of your book, say what you want people to do.
Now, Ian Fleming, what he's telling you to do is be a James Bond citizen.
Be a James Bond.
Go out there.
See what you can uncover on your own.
Be strong and don't get yourself killed.
Okay, so that's what the message of James Bond is.
And basically, Jason Bourne is a spinoff of James Bond.
Sure.
So he's got a message there that he's sending out to you.
The other guys, you know, the Gray State guy, I'm not really too thrilled about his message, but he's basically saying be a prepper and all that kind of stuff.
But there needs to be a clear message.
Well, we didn't get a chance to see his movie yet.
That was the documentary you were talking about, but the movie, we really didn't get the full message.
Now, maybe they're going to get that out there, and I wrote an article.
I have an article on my site about that guy's death.
David Crowley, I think is his name.
Right.
And that was an incredible tragedy.
Certainly Michael Hastings, I have back channel information on his death.
No doubt about it, it was a hit.
And he was getting too close to some things.
I mean, this kind of thing is going on constantly now.
So, yeah, very important.
Well, but what I'm saying is that the authors need to be more like James Bond.
They need to pick up some of these fieldcraft self-defense measures and stop living in a delusional land that the enemy is going to play polite.
Like I said, the enemy is killing women and children now.
They're not even showing any respect and decent opponent rules.
They're not even fighting fair.
So the people doing this have to raise their game and stop being in naive land.
Okay.
And one of the things I'm critical of Colby about was Colby didn't take enough security measures.
Colby said, well, if they want me, they'll get me.
Yeah, but you make them pay for it.
You know, if they're going to barge in your house, you need to kill a few of them.
You know what I'm trying to say?
They know.
I mean, really.
No, I appreciate that.
I know some people that have a similar point of view.
Certainly...
You know, William Behold a Pale Horse.
Bill Cooper.
Bill Cooper would have said the same thing and actually tried to do that.
He tried to live according to that.
I lost your audio.
Okay, Bill, I was just finished.
I just was done there.
Just in reference to Bill Cooper, that, you know, he basically made it a gun battle.
Right, but he could have done things better, so he wouldn't get into that situation.
And you need to ask for some help, you know what I'm saying, and have more witnesses there.
So, you know, it isn't a private he said, she said thing.
You know, well, they said he did this.
Well, he says he did that.
Well, he's dead, so he's not there to defend himself.
So there's safety in numbers, at least at the tactical level, you know, of the incident.
There isn't enough safeties in numbers.
I mean, let's face it, if they have to sink the Titanic to kill you, they will.
You know what I mean?
They'll murder over a thousand people.
There's plenty of evidence of that, yes.
Right, exactly.
But it helps to have some people on the scene who will fight with you, and if anything else, they could be a witness and say, hey, Bill Cooper didn't start that fight, etc., etc., etc.
You need to have some people surrounding you, and they don't live like a hermit, you know, and that kind of thing.
But you have with the John F. Kennedy assassination, them telling the world that if they want to whack you, they'll whack you in public.
So that's kind of the message there.
Most of us are not going to be in any kind of public event.
We're going to live our private lives, and they'll try to knock us off during our private life.
But that's where the declaration of resistance needs to be made.
You need to post it on your webpage, your homepage, somewhere, your statement saying you will never commit suicide.
Right, and as a matter of fact, Camelot did that in the early days, just for the record.
Oh, very good.
Very smart.
In fact, we have a whole list that people could sign and agree saying that about themselves.
Later on, some people get cold feet and they wanted their names removed.
But yeah, we started the list like that in our very early days.
And the list is still valid.
In fact, what I'd like to do is actually, once we can get some money somewhere down the line and get the site ever in the shape, I'd like it.
I'd like people to be able to sign themselves up and then they can always take their name down themselves rather than having us orchestrate something like that.
But yeah, it's a good point and actually I've heard it other places as well.
So listen, in terms of the overall picture of what you're getting into now, You've got this new book that's coming out and you're making a number of videos.
Is there any other sort of area that you want to direct people to go to in the future that you're looking into, that you want to make a mention of?
Yeah, well, it's basically the way that we communicate.
Looking at all of this, I don't make videos where I narrate the videos.
And I'm thinking the number one evil here that we've got is television.
And you'd say, well, Mike, you're being a hypocrite because you're making little mini television videos yourself.
But I've been making them as silent documentaries.
Basically, you have to read moving text at the bottom.
So what I would like to do is see a silent documentary movement take place where people take basically a book, because a book is written words, And making books into movies, into videos, using the silent documentary technique.
Some people don't like it, but you understand what I'm saying is have people watch the video and read the information silently to themselves and integrate it into their mind and consider it instead of having an authority figure John Paul Van was a great man.
Having your deep voice guy talk to you and believing in him as the reason you believe in what's being said.
I think we need to invigorate books so that we keep the book around.
I think people are trying to knock the book off.
I'm not really happy with the e-book itself.
You say, but more people are reading books than ever.
But you can't take an e-book and take, you know, a highlight pen, you know, or a redaction pen, and underline it.
You can, actually.
Yeah, I know, but really, you can't.
You know, it's close.
You've got to see beyond the token.
You know what I mean?
They're going to say that.
They're going to say, you can, with some difficulty, annotate as you read an e-book.
People are not going to do it.
The main motive of the e-book is to destroy this.
They want to destroy the book that exists as a physical object.
Because what happens if the grid goes down?
Are you going to have a bunch of generators to keep your e-books going?
No.
Well, no, I mean, this is something that, and this is true, by the way, just for the record, of DVDs of YouTube videos, because if people stop making DVDs on discs, we have a whistleblower who basically said years ago that if there's an EMP, that all the devices will go down, but those discs will last.
So, just like a book, you can preserve your videos, and in the Camelot, you know, Of course, doing that is of paramount importance to us.
So we are hard at work actually making a library of DVDs that we are then going to try to sell to the public.
It is a laborious task, let me tell you, when you have as many videos as we do.
But it's very, very important because there could be a time when the grid does go down and we need to preserve our knowledge.
Right, and then you can have books doing that too without needing any electricity.
So a combination of books and DVDs that you can just turn on for short periods of time with your generated, supported electronic device to restore society again, if that's what needs to be done, or just restore the truth because they're going to try to squash it by saying, hey, we had a big power outage that lasted for two years.
You know, that'll totally clean the slate of a lot of, you know, whistleblowing and investigative reporting and whatnot, so you don't want that to happen.
You know, basically another dark age, right?
So the book is kind of immune to the dark age, and I just wanted to put a plug in there for the very first book of all time.
The very first book of all time was the Bible.
It was the demand for people wanting to read the Word of God that caused the printing press to be created.
If you think about it, then why did God wait and just put the book out, the Bible, later?
Well, you notice he chose the time, just when man was coming out of his dark age, to be on the ground floor of the very first book.
In other words, there isn't a bunch of competing voices.
The only people that are going to have counterfeit Bibles are some knuckleheads making scrolls, saying, you know, we're Gnostics.
Our bodies are just, you know, ephemeral.
Oh, well, I mean...
You understand what I'm saying?
So, in other words, there wasn't as many competition...
In my opinion, God didn't write the Bible.
God doesn't write books.
But I do appreciate the sentiment with which you're saying that.
I appreciate that.
A bunch of white men wrote the Bible and unfortunately got it wrong in a large measure.
There's two possibilities here, right?
I wanted to show the possibilities in good faith.
You can write a book and it can be accurate.
It doesn't necessarily mean it's the truth.
So that's what I was trying to do with Brian Garfield earlier.
The point is, you and I could communicate, Carrie, and I could write a letter to you as my book.
I can make sure if it's exactly what I want to tell you.
That's what I mean by accuracy.
The book can be 100% accurate.
Whether it's true or not, in my book I'll say, for instance, I believe the Super Bowl a couple weeks ago was rigged by gamblers, which I do.
Yeah.
Doesn't mean it's necessarily true, but it is exactly accurate of what I want to tell you.
And the fact is, I think that once you have accurate communication, then you can go back and see if it's true or not.
You disagree with the Bible being written from God?
I do.
But let's just take the Super Bowl as a little tamer example.
Once you have accurate communication and there's no glitching, we had glitching all day today, tonight with us, you can then go back and see the message and see if the message is true, which is a separate issue.
And I think that if you're on the goal line...
And you don't run the ball when you've got this monster running back, and you've only got to go a couple feet, and you throw the ball?
I think they threw the game deliberately, and there's just billions of dollars in gambling going on in the NFL. So my decision is I'm not going to watch the NFL anymore, even if Katy Perry is doing the halftime show.
To heck with it.
It's all rigged.
Well, she's a spokesman for the Satanists anyway, apparently, according to many people.
According to some whistleblower, maybe so, but according to some back-channel information I have.
Okay, well, you know, I appreciate you.
I appreciate all that you have to say, Mike, and I want to thank you very much.
We do need to close this down, and I'm trying to figure out whether or not we're still broadcasting.
I think we are.
I can tell there's a huge lag, a time lag between what we're saying here and what's being said on, because I've got a, I opened another computer.
It's not a computer, but it's a little book, iBook thing.
In order to try to monitor the situation because I have no way otherwise of knowing for sure.
If anyone's still listening, just have them go to the Dyna McPara 2 YouTube channel and there'll be another video about what we just discussed.
So if something gets missed, I'm going to try to capture it all on another video.
All right.
Well, I appreciate your time and thank you so much.
I think that this is also an...
An authentic medium.
I believe documentaries and also live broadcasts.
I think live broadcasts are vital.
It's like having a conversation with somebody in which you absolutely are there.
And so this is a very important medium.
And so I want to preserve it.
And I just wish the technology at our end, we know that behind in the secret space program, the technology is millions of years, hundreds, thousands of years in advance, and they have no problem keeping a connection or anything else.
We are being interfered with right, left, and center.
But nonetheless, this is an important medium, and so thank you for taking the time with me.
To talk about these important subjects.
Alright, so we will have links.
I hope you'll send me some more links.
I'll put them on the page along with the video once we get it edited and put up there.
What we will be doing is not editing for content.
But we will have to link all the different parts together, and that's pretty much all I do.
I don't do any kind of editing of your words whatsoever, so no worries there.
It will go onto YouTube after this and definitely reach a larger audience than the one we've been able to get.
This evening, although I know we had some very patient people out there bearing with us with all the problems we've had.