Owen Shroyer Live - OSL 57 - Free Speech Faces Greatest Risks Ever Under Joe Biden And The Global Cabal

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 19, 2024 - Owen Shroyer Live

01:49:48

OSL 57 - Free Speech Faces Greatest Risks Ever Under Joe Biden And The Global Cabal

Participants

Main voices

owen shroyer

01:03:26

Appearances

justice ketanji brown jackson

04:42

justice samuel alito

02:01

rabbi michael barclay

01:13

Clips

jim jordan

00:36

Callers

albert in pennsylvania

03:05

bart in georgia

00:34

bucktooth beaver in unknown

01:17

dennis in chicago

01:18

donnie in oklahoma

02:34

kyle in nebraska

02:41

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		USIO is from the hunting nowhere to buy.
		Hey, am I a mouse?
		My friends.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's see your dancing emojis.
unidentified		Let's go.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Start it off right.
unidentified		All right, we're coming in tonight with a little Corpaclani.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Corporate Klanny.
		Another Nordic full metal band bringing us in tonight.
		I just can't help myself.
		I just can't help myself.
		Owen Schroyer Live, episode 57, coming to you as always through the Owen.gold microphone.
		Join the club.
		Become a member of the pack at owen.gold, the only subscription that pays you back.
		You know of any others where you join and you get paid back?
		No.
		Only at owen.gold.
		We got AIM316 in the house.
		By the way, I still have a gift for you.
		I haven't mailed it out yet, but we will mail it this week.
		Good to see all my regular friends in the Rumble chat.
		Glad to be joined by the audience on X as well.
		AIM, I got your pants right here.
		I still haven't mailed them out.
		I think what we'll do is we'll do another giveaway tonight.
		The largest, I'm just going to pull.
		I'm just going to pull I'm just going to pull a shirt from the merchandise.
		You don't get a shirt for free.
		You have to earn it.
		I'm going to pull a shirt from the merchandise.
		And we're going to give this shirt away tonight to the highest Rumble rant.
		I don't know.
		AIM 316 wins every time.
		I mean, would it be fair to disqualify him because he wins every time?
unidentified		So here we go, pulling it.
unidentified		All right, here we go.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Biggest Rumble rant tonight will be the recipient of this shirt.
		Owen Schroyer did nothing wrong.
		What do we got?
		A size L in the soft cotton gray.
		I believe this is a tri-blend.
		Very nice, very soft.
		Largest Rumble rant tonight.
		I will mail you this shirt.
		I'll sign it as well if you want.
		We're just going to do, we're just going to do merchandise giveaways, I think, every Monday night here on the show.
		I think we'll just do that every Monday night.
		So here we are.
		Here we are talking about the issue of free speech.
		want to take a lot of calls tonight too this issue is not being properly discussed or covered and And in fact, let me even pull up.
		I'm going to pull up.
		I'm going to be monitoring the mainstream news tonight as well.
		But so far, I was monitoring it before I signed on.
		And nobody's really talking about this.
		I don't get it.
		I don't get it.
		We have the biggest free speech issues happening in our country right now, and it barely gets any media attention.
		Now, the easy explanation would perhaps be the same explanation.
		They're all talking about the bloodbath.
		All of them are sitting around talking about the bloodbath lie.
		That's all it is.
		That's been the top story all night.
		I get it.
		The fake news lies about Trump.
		They're also attacking him with the judicial system.
		We get it.
		So this has been the top story on every show all night long.
		And if it's the liberal anti-Trump media, it's how Trump said bloodbath.
		If it's the conservative right-wing media, it's about how the left is lying about the context of Trump saying bloodbath.
		And all of it should be irrelevant by now.
		So why won't the mainstream media touch the issue of free speech?
		Because it's not real to them yet.
		The average television host, the issue of free speech is not real to them.
		In other words, they're not being censored off the internet, and they're not being arrested and incarcerated for their speech.
		So it's just not real to them yet.
		The minute Sean Hannity gets censored off the internet, the minute Sean Hannity gets arrested for his speech, then it'll be a big deal to him.
		But until then, not so much.
		Same with the average congressman or woman.
		Same with the average talk show host, TV, radio, internet.
		all the same.
		But there was a significant news story today.
		There was an extremely significant news story today dealing with Katenji Brown Jackson, who clearly doesn't belong on the Supreme Court, nowhere near it.
		The only reason, the only reason why Katenji Brown Jackson is on the Supreme Court is because she's black.
		She might also be a gay.
		I don't even know.
		But it's all because she's a black woman.
		That's it.
		And Biden promised he'd put a black woman on the Supreme Court, not the most qualified, not with the most experience, not who deserves it or earned it, but a black woman.
		Justice Katenji Brown Jackson, who doesn't know what a woman is.
		She's got plenty of bling, though.
		She knows how to rock some bling, doesn't she?
		Doesn't know what a woman is.
		Justice Katenji Brown Jackson backs government censorship, First Amendment hamstringing government in significant ways.
		So I guess you got to get rid of that pesky First Amendment, don't you?
		I guess you just got to get rid of that pesky old First Amendment because it's in your way.
		You want to censor American speech, but that First Amendment is in your way.
		Now, of course, this opinion, this argument disqualifies her from the Supreme Court, if not the judicial bench altogether.
		If you don't understand the basic concept of the First Amendment, if you don't understand the basic concept of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, if you don't understand the Declaration of Independence, if you don't understand that the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is there to block government from taking our rights, endowed by our Creator, by God, then you don't belong anywhere near the bench.
		Now, this is part of the Supreme Court case to decide on whether the government can coerce social media companies to censor content it doesn't like, including dissenting views on COVID-19 and election integrity.
		Now, this all stems from the Biden administration, the Biden regime, the Biden circus, Where they were sending out emails and notifications telling social media companies to censor information on COVID, to censor information on COVID treatments, the vaccine, to censor information on Hunter Biden's laptop and the 2020 election and the 2021 results.
	the democrats censoring your free speech and katenji brown jackson says well yeah the government should censor speech but that first amendment is in the way
	And as C.S. Hollywood points out in the chat, yeah, me covering this case could affect my case going in front of the Supreme Court.
	But see, here's the thing about that: I have to live with this.
	Most of what I do now is scrutinized by the highest levels of government.
	Whenever I talk about the Supreme Court, whenever I talk about the Biden administration, whenever I talk about certain prosecuting attorneys, district attorneys, what have you, I am under the scrutiny of the federal government, and anything I say can be used or will be used against me to try to throw me in jail again.
	Trust me.
	I've been basically told so much.
	So I had to make a decision.
	I have two options.
	I guess maybe you could say three, but I basically have two options.
	Either I continue to do my news coverage and my commentary, not in fear of being punished by the government for it, even though that's a very real scenario that I've already been faced with.
	Talk about free speech being under attack.
	Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself, but since it gets brought up in the comments, I can either continue to do my news coverage and my commentary without being fearful of being thrown back in jail by the federal government, which is a threat every day, or I can censor myself.
	I can live in fear of the government throwing me back in jail, which is what they want.
	Therefore, hurting my coverage, hurting my commentary, and not delivering the information in the manner in which you tune in to receive it.
	So, really, those are my two options.
	Now, the third option would be try to have your cake and eat it too, but really, that's just option two, isn't it?
	Try to cover the issues, but not go all the way in.
	try to tell the truth, but not too much that it risks me getting incarcerated again.
	So yes, I realize when I cover certain stories, when I cover certain issues, when I name certain names, I yet again risk my own life and risk being thrown in jail again.
	Because keep in mind, I'm on federal probation, the strictest federal probation till the end of the year.
	And I can't even cover that in its entirety for certain reasons.
	You will have to wait until my probation is over until I give you the full coverage of what's really going on behind the scenes.
	But believe me, they'd love to throw me in jail.
	But getting back to the point, so I'm covering this.
	I'm speaking negatively of Kentenji Brown Jackson.
	I'm saying she doesn't belong on the bench.
	I'm saying the only reason she's on the bench is because she's a black woman.
	I could have my case in front of the Supreme Court by this summer.
	And do you think this commentary and talking like this about Brown Jackson is going to help or hurt my case?
	Of course, it's not going to help my case.
	Of course, Brown Jackson is going to find out who I am and how I cover her, and she's going to rule against me.
	It's likely that she would do that anyway, but that's where we're at.
	And by the way, you know, it's crazy what you learn about the legal world because the whole system is set up for you to fail in ways that you can't even imagine until you deal with it firsthand.
	But I'll come back to that.
	Back to the Supreme Court justice that says the First Amendment is in the way of government censoring you.
	Yeah, that's the law.
	It's not that the First Amendment is in the way.
	The First Amendment is stopping the government from censoring me.
	That's the entire point of the First Amendment.
	But this is why Democrats want to get rid of the First Amendment.
	This is like the Supreme Court will say, well, gee, I'd love to disarm every American, but that dang Second Amendment is in the way.
	So, in other words, we need to change the First Amendment.
	We need to change the Second Amendment.
	We need to get rid of the First Amendment.
	We need to get rid of the Second Amendment.
	Liberal Supreme Court Justice Katenji Brown Jackson appeared to support government censorship during oral arguments on Monday, claiming her biggest concern is the First Amendment hamstringing the government.
	Exactly.
	She doesn't like the First Amendment.
	Her biggest concern is the First Amendment.
	Not that the government is censoring speech.
	By the way, it'd be one thing if the government, it still would be free speech.
	I'd still be against it.
	But this would be an entirely different story if the government was censoring actual false information or foreign propaganda.
	This is the U.S. government censoring free speech, censoring the truth.
	This is the U.S. government.
	This is the Democrats.
	This is the Biden regime censoring the truth.
	Not censoring foreign propaganda, even.
	Not censoring violent or hateful speech, which is legal anyway.
	This is the government censoring truth.
	Truth.
	So they got to get rid of the First Amendment because they want to censor the truth.
	This should be your biggest story tonight, not the fake news bloodbath.
	The Supreme Court heard arguments on the Biden Justice Department's appeal of the Murphy v.
	Missouri case, where numerous states, not just Missouri, numerous states accuse Democrat officials in the Biden administration of pressuring social media companies to unconstitutionally censor conservative viewpoints on topics like COVID-19 and election integrity.
	Oh, don't speak freely about COVID-19.
	Oh, if a Democrat wins an election, you're not allowed.
	You're not allowed to question it.
	And the Democrats are going to come censor you if you do or imprison you in my case.
	Because see, they already censored me off all social media.
	When all this was going on, I was censored on all social media, but I kept talking.
	So after they censor you and you keep talking, they throw you in prison.
	The United States argued that White House communications staffers, the Surgeon General, the FBI, and the U.S. Cybersecurity Agency are among those who coerced social media platforms to censor content.
	At one point, Brown Jackson claimed that certain situations may warrant government censorship.
	Oh, but the First Amendment is in her way.
	Quote: Whether or not the government can do this depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence.
	There may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
	Really?
	Does it say that in the First Amendment?
	Do I need maybe we need to bring up the First Amendment?
	Because I don't remember seeing that anywhere.
	Do you?
	I don't remember seeing that anywhere in the First Amendment.
unidentified		Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's see what we have here.
		Let me see here.
		Okay.
		First Amendment, fundamental freedoms.
		Constitution.
		Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or the press or the right of the people peacefully to assemble and to petition the government for redress of grievances.
unidentified		Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I don't see anything in there like Ketenji Brown Jackson is saying, except maybe on the internet, except maybe when it goes against a Democrat narrative, except maybe when it comes to election integrity, except maybe when it comes to information on a virus or a treatment of a virus, I don't see that anywhere.
unidentified		Huh.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I must, I'm missing it, guys, but I'm not seeing that anywhere in the First Amendment.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's odd.
unidentified		Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Maybe there's something else I could find here.
		Maybe I'm interested in something.
		Maybe there's an answer in the Declaration of Independence that I can find here.
		The preamble.
		We hold these truths to be self-evident, common sense, self-evident, common sense.
		We all understand this.
		That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator, God, with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
		See, these things used to be considered self-evident, meaning common sense.
		Everyone understood it.
		Everyone agreed.
		These rights are endowed by God, the creator, God, not government.
		Our rights come from God, not government.
		God, the creator.
		Unalienable.
		Not to be alienated, not to be separated from, not to be removed from life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
		But somehow, a Supreme Court justice doesn't agree.
		Somehow, a Supreme Court justice asks the question in an oral argument on a free speech case: whether or not the government can do this.
		Censor speech depends on the application of our First Amendment.
		What application?
		Either you believe in it or you don't.
		There might be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
		I don't see that in the First Amendment.
		I see the exact opposite.
		I see unalienable.
		I see endowed by the Creator.
		I see self-evident.
		Judge Katenji Brown Jackson sees none of the above.
		Judge Katenji Brown Jackson says, Well, maybe sometimes we can censor.
		Maybe sometimes that is the application.
unidentified		Hmm.
unidentified		Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So not only do they want to censor, they want to coerce.
		They want to be able to censor, and if they can't outright censor, they want to be able to coerce.
		Here is some of the actual audio from the oral arguments from Injustice Katenji Brown Jackson.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Whether or not the government can do this, this is something I took up with Mr. Fletcher, depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence, and there may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
		I mean, do you disagree that we would have to apply strict scrutiny and determine whether or not there is a compelling interest in how the government has tailored its regulation?
		Certainly, Your Honor, I think at the end of every First Amendment analysis, you'll have the strict scrutiny framework in which, you know, in some national security hypos, for example, the government may well be able to demonstrate a compelling interest, may well be able to demonstrate in which the government engages in conduct that ultimately has some effect on free on speech necessarily becomes a First Amendment violation, correct?
		Maybe not necessarily, Your Honor.
unidentified		I guess the top-line question I would ask is: has the government set out to abridge the freedom of speech?
unidentified		And in this case, you see that time and time again, because if you control it.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		It's not the test for First Amendment violations.
unidentified		Your Honor, this flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, right?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		No, I understand, but we have a test for a determination of whether or not the First Amendment is actually violated.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So in certain situations, you know, the government can actually require that speech be suppressed if there's a compelling interest, right?
unidentified		It can, Your Honor.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		She asked the question, but she doesn't give an example.
unidentified		The government never got to strict scrutiny because the government never raised this.
justice samuel alito ▲ ● ▼		This has never been litigated.
unidentified		The question in this case is whether at the front end, the government itself has undertaken.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Is the coercion?
		Is the state action, right?
		That's the question in this case.
unidentified		And I would urge the court to address the state action issue just like you addressed it in Banta Books.
		You used that term four times in Bantam books.
		And court needs to understand because it seems like an extremely expansive argument, I must say.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, why does she sound like a valley girl when she does all this?
unidentified		Justice Jackson?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time period.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why isn't that your view?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		I mean, what would you have the government do?
		I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, is not going to get it done.
		And so I guess some might say that you're not our big brother.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You're not our daddy.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		To take steps.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Did you hear that?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		The citizens of this can.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Listen to this notion.
		Justice Katenji Brown Jackson takes it upon herself to become my daddy.
		Justice Brown Jackson thinks it's the government's job to be your mommy, to be your daddy, to be your big brother, to be your authority figure.
		That's what she's asserting right here.
		Listen again.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Don't do it, is not going to get it done.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm not your kid.
		The American people are not your children.
		You are a Supreme Court justice meant to uphold the law of the land, which at the highest level is the U.S. Constitution, and you are going against it now and saying, oh, the First Amendment hamstrings government's ability to censor speech.
		That's the entire point.
		But it doesn't just hamstring, it blocks.
		So here, Katenji Brown Jackson is arguing that she's your mommy and she knows what's best for you and she believes the government can determine what's best for you.
		And she also says the quiet part out loud, that the First Amendment is in her way.
		She wants to censor you, but the First Amendment is in her way.
		This is how Democrats think.
		This is how liberals think.
		So what's the conclusion?
		If they want to censor you, get rid of the First Amendment.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		And so I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country.
		And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information.
		So can you help me?
		Because I'm really, I'm really worried about that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's listen to this again.
		What is the government's duty?
		What is the government's duty?
		Is it the government's duty to keep you safe?
		No.
		Is it the government's duty to make sure there aren't words that might hurt you?
unidentified		No.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What is the government's duty to protect your rights?
		That's the government's duty.
		Justice Katenji Brown Jackson is an embarrassment.
		She is a shame.
		She is a complete and utter clown with this oral argument.
		And she shows here that she not only doesn't understand the Bill of Rights, she doesn't respect the Bill of Rights.
		And she lets the entire liberal ideology out of the bag.
		Government wants to be your daddy.
		Government wants to run your life.
		And they believe it's their duty to do so.
		What does it all equate to?
		Democrats want to be authoritarians.
		Liberals want to be totalitarians.
unidentified		They don't even hide it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Listen again to what Supreme Court Justice Katenji Brown Jackson thinks the government's duty is.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information.
		So can you help me?
		Oh, is that funny?
		Some might say that the government actually has a duty.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Who would say?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So, I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty.
unidentified		Who?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Who would say?
		Who would say that the government has a duty to censor my speech?
		Who would say that the government has a duty to keep me safe?
		Who would say that?
		Some might say, I'm a valley girl that got through school and onto the Supreme Court because I'm a black woman.
		And I'm up here completely overthrowing the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, pretending to be an intellectual, pretending to be philosophical.
		Some might say it's the government's duty to be your daddy.
		Some might say it's my duty to be your mommy.
		She says, oh, you can't just tell kids not to do something.
		You have to enforce it.
		You're not our parents.
		Some might say the government has a duty to do this.
		Might say a liberal authoritarian like Katenji Brown Jackson.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		It is a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country.
		And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information.
		So, can you help me?
		Because I'm really worried about that because you've got the First Amendment operating.
		Oh, operating.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, the First Amendment is operating, guys.
		It's not enshrined in law by the Constitution.
		It's not the cornerstone of our country.
		It's just operating.
		So she wants to stop it from operating.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		About that, because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective, and you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems.
unidentified		And, Your Honor, I understand that in Seen.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And I guess what I tell you is the unbelievable argument.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		She says it all right there.
unidentified		Justice Jackson.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		We're going to hear whether or not the government can do this.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		This is my biggest.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, this is just unbelievable.
		It's just unbelievable.
		She doesn't even hide it.
		A Supreme Court justice believes that it's the government's role to be your parents.
		A Supreme Court justice thinks that the First Amendment is in the way of government censorship, and so she wants to get rid of it.
		A Supreme Court justice thinks it's the government's duty to run your life.
		Talk about dangerous.
		But she goes on.
		She wasn't even done there.
		Now she tells you how she really feels about the First Amendment.
unidentified		Justice Jackson?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods.
		I mean, what would you have the government do?
		I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, is not going to get it done.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the entire point of the First Amendment is to stop government from taking our rights.
		That's the entire Bill of Rights.
		That's the entire purpose.
		What doesn't Supreme Court Brown Jackson get, Justice Jackson?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's when the First Amendment is the most important.
		This is a faux intellectual.
		This is a faux philosophical pretending to be smart.
		Stunning.
		Stunning.
		That is just simply stunning.
		And I think Justice Alito was a little stunned by it.
justice samuel alito ▲ ● ▼		And I see that the White House and federal officials are repeatedly saying that Facebook and the federal government should be partners.
		We're on the same team.
		Officials are demanding answers.
		I want an answer.
		I want it right away.
		When they're unhappy, they curse them out.
		There are regular meetings.
		There is constant pestering of Facebook and some of the other platforms, and they want to have regular meetings.
		And they suggest, why don't you suggest rules that should be applied?
		And why don't you tell us everything that you're going to do so we can help you and we can look it over.
		And I thought, wow, I cannot imagine federal officials taking that approach to the print media, our representatives over there.
		If you did that to them, what do you think the reaction would be?
		And so I thought, you know, the only reason why this is taking place is because the federal government has got Section 230 and antitrust in its pocket.
		And it's, to mix my metaphors, and it's got these big clubs available to it.
		And so it's treating Facebook and these other platforms like their subordinates.
		Would you do that to the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or the Associated Press or any other big newspaper or wire service?
unidentified		So there's a lot packed in there.
		I want to give you one very specific answer first and then step back out to the broader context.
		So specifically, you mentioned demanding an answer right away and cursing them out.
		The only time that happens is in an email that's about the president's own Instagram account.
		It's not about moderating other people's.
justice samuel alito ▲ ● ▼		Okay, well, put that aside.
		There's all the rest.
		Constant meetings, constant emails.
		We want answers.
		We're partners.
		We're on the same team.
		Do you think that the print media regards themselves as being on the same team as the federal government, partners with the federal government?
unidentified		So potentially in the context of an effort to get Americans vaccinated during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, there it is.
unidentified		No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
		You don't get away with that.
		A once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.
		A once-in-a-lifetime election.
		A once-in-a-lifetime news story.
		A once-in-a-lifetime this.
		I just checked the First Amendment.
		I've read the Constitution.
		I've read the Bill of Rights.
		I just read the Declaration of Independence.
		We just, I don't, I don't believe anywhere in there says once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, once-in-a-lifetime virus, once-in-a-lifetime election, once-in-a-lifetime this, once-in-a-lifetime.
		No, I don't believe that ever happened because now you understand the precedent.
		Certainly you understand the danger of that precedent.
		Now there's a quote-unquote once-in-a-lifetime anything.
		And the government has to get involved in coercion and manipulation and deception and censorship.
		And of course, we can't allow that.
		And it doesn't exist in the founding documents.
		It doesn't exist in the Constitution.
		It doesn't exist in the Bill of Rights.
		No.
		No.
		A pandemic does not change the Bill of Rights.
		An election result that you like or dislike does not change the Bill of Rights.
		These people should be tossed out of the Supreme Court post-haste.
		These people should be tossed out.
		I mean, physically tossed.
		I mean, thrown to the stairs.
		And Americans should be outside with rotten tomatoes to be raining down on them.
		These anti-American commie scum politically.
		Oh, but oh, that's my free speech.
		That'll probably land me in jail.
unidentified		Principles, but it's relevant to how they apply here.
unidentified		And I think it's important to understand that at this time, this was a time when thousands of Americans were still dying every week, and there was a hope that getting everyone vaccinated could stop the pandemic.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		These people don't give a damn if you die.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Don't spare me your, oh, we were trying to stop people from dying.
unidentified		No, you weren't.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You don't give a damn when Americans die.
		You don't give a damn when illegal immigrants kill Americans.
		You don't give a damn with all the crime in the inner cities.
		You don't give a damn when an American dies from one of your vaccines.
		You don't give a damn about Americans dying, you lying scum.
		This is just, oh my gosh, this is infuriating.
unidentified		And there was a concern that.
unidentified		Oh, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And if you really wanted to stop people from dying for COVID, why did you stop ivermectin?
		Why did you stop zinc and vitamin D?
		Why did you stop that?
unidentified		Americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms, and the platforms were promoting, not just promoting bad information.
justice samuel alito ▲ ● ▼		I understand all that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So what?
		So there it is.
		So the government wants to be your daddy.
		The government wants to be the arbiter of what you see and what you don't see.
		Just like why they want to get rid of TikTok because they don't control it.
		They don't care about China.
		China owns Apple.
		Most of our products manufactured, China.
		Most of our goods, China.
		Most of our prescription pills, China.
		They don't say a damn about that.
		They can't control the narrative on TikTok.
		That's why they're trying to force a sale of it.
justice samuel alito ▲ ● ▼		And I know the objectives were good, but once again, they were also getting their news from the print media and the broadcast media and cable media.
		And I just can't imagine the federal government doing that to them.
		But maybe I'm naive.
		Maybe that goes on behind the scenes.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Ah, indeed.
unidentified		That's all I. But I do.
		I think this is important because I have the same reaction that you do that these emails look unusual.
		I think the idea that there'd be back and forth between the government and the media isn't unusual at all.
		When the White House press secretary on July 16th is asked about this by the way.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, no, no, no, no.
		This isn't some back and forth.
		This isn't back and forth between the White House and the media, the government and the media.
		This is the government coercing censorship of the media.
		Censorship of truth.
unidentified		What she says is, of course, we talk to the platforms just the way we talk to all of you when we have concerns about what you're doing, when we have information that you might find helpful.
		Now, there's an intensity of the back and forth here, and there's an anger that I think is unusual, but the context.
		Oh, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why are you so angry that the government wants to take away your free speech?
		Why are you so angry that the government censors the truth?
		And I'm sorry, where is the Hunter Biden laptop in all this?
		Because is that real or fake?
		I can't decide.
		Because first they said it was fake.
		Then Hunter Biden sued to get his laptop back because it was real.
		But now they're saying it's fake again.
		So which one is it?
unidentified		I think is that these platforms were saying publicly, we want to help.
		We think we have a responsibility to give people accurate information and not bad information.
		And we're doing everything.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, that's not the government's duty at all.
unidentified		That's where this language of partnership comes from.
		It's not just from the White House.
		It's these platforms, which are powerful, sophisticated entities, saying we're doing the best we can.
		And the anger, I think, really most of the anger when you read the emails, and I appreciate that you have because I think you have to look at them in context.
		The anger is when the officials think that the platforms are not being transparent about the scope of the problem or aren't giving information that's available.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, your anger, the Democrats' anger, is that information is getting out that hurts their agenda.
		Information is getting out that hurts their narrative.
		That's why they're angry.
		The American people are angry because our First Amendment is being violated and we have criminals that run our government.
		And they want to shut anybody down that calls it out.
		That's why they censor me off the internet.
		That's why they throw me in prison.
		That is stunning stuff.
		It's funny when Justice Alito says, oh, maybe this does happen at print media.
		Bingo.
		Maybe this does happen with cable media.
		Bingo.
		Barack Obama made it legal for the government to censor and promote propaganda.
		So yeah, that does go on, unfortunately.
		that does go on.
		It's not that, well, maybe you are naive, but see, this is what I constantly talk about.
		And it's a source of much of our frustration.
		You'd think, you would think that somebody sitting on the Supreme Court would be as informed or smart as you are, or as passionate about your patriotism and country as you are, but they're not.
		The average judge in this country has no clue what's even going on, folks.
		They don't have a clue.
		Most attorneys are either corrupt or ignorant.
		They don't understand anything that's going on.
		If you can keep up with my commentary or my news coverage that I do on a daily basis, you are quite literally in the top 1% of politically informed and understood people in the country.
		And that includes United States judges, district attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, U.S. attorneys.
		1%.
		1%.
		That's not because I'm some sort of a genius or you're some sort of a genius.
		You just care.
		You just follow information.
		You just understand the picture and the threat.
		You just have a survival instinct.
		If you keep up with my political commentary on Infowars and right here on Rumble, you are in the top 1% of the politically informed and understood people in the United States of America.
		And I got news for you.
		There are not very many judges on this 1%.
		There are not very many U.S. attorneys on this 1%.
		They do not have a clue.
		I mean, just the attorneys that I work with, when I hire them, don't even understand or believe half this stuff.
		And then they have to go through it with me.
		Then they have to go through it with me just to get an understanding of it.
		And then they say, whoa, this stuff you talk about, it is real.
		This is really what's going on.
		Whoa, now I understand this.
		Now I understand that.
		So I at least give Justice illegal credit because he says, well, I can't imagine this going on at print media or TV or cable news media, but maybe I'm naive.
		Maybe it does.
		Bingo.
		See, that's somebody who's actually trying to be philosophical and intellectual, but honest, that he might not know or understand everything, and that he might be naive about something.
		Just like we all should be.
		The Smith-Munt Act.
		Was that the Smith-Munt Act?
		Was that the propaganda act by Obama?
		I believe it was.
		Barack Obama with the Smith-Munt Act.
		I don't think he wrote it, but he brought it back to law saying that the U.S. government can propagandize the American people.
		And then, of course, his administration used it at will, spied on President Trump, lied about President Trump.
		So, look, you can have a debate about censorship when it comes to private companies.
		You can have a debate about censorship when it comes to private companies.
		You can have that debate.
		Not with the U.S. government.
		There is no debate.
		The debate was already settled in the founding of this country with the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, and the U.S. Constitution.
		So there is no debate.
		The debate is settled.
		But if you're a liberal Supreme Court justice, you think the debate is still on, and you think the First Amendment is in the government's way to censor speech, and so therefore, what?
unidentified		It should be removed.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		The arguments made and heard by Katenji Brown Jackson should be immediately disqualifying for any further role, not only on the Supreme Court, but in the judicial system at large.
		She should be disbarred and removed from the bench immediately.
		But again, most people aren't even paying attention to this.
		They don't even know what's going on, which brings us back to the 1%.
		And here we are.
		And here we are.
		Most of the political media in America have no idea this is going on.
		Most of the judges, most of the attorneys in America have no idea any of this is even going on.
		But you do.
		because you're in the 1%, and it's an honor to be here with you.
		We'll finish up with our coverage of this.
		And then I will take some phone calls.
		Here's Representative Jim Jordan talking about this incredible oral argument from Katenji Brown Jackson earlier today.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		I just came from the argument.
		I will tell you that there was one line that I still can't believe Judge Jackson said this, but she actually said to the Solicitor General from Louisiana, she said, you've got the First Amendment hamstringing the government.
		Now think about that.
		That's the whole thinking purpose.
		Like it's supposed to, the government was not supposed to.
		I mean, the fact that you have a person on the United States Supreme Court make that statement in the arguments on a case about censorship and the First Amendment.
unidentified		It's just like, I'm like, at one point, I can only know what to say.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Like, how could that statement?
unidentified		That's like saying the problem with the Second Amendment is it's going to make the government afraid of coming to your house to take your guns away.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		I just came from the argument.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		I will tell you.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That would be like a doctor not knowing what a woman is.
		That would be like a doctor thinking that a man can get pregnant.
		That would be like a doctor telling you that a 12-year-old boy is actually a girl.
		He just needs to cut him up with a knife.
unidentified		Oh, wait.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		The left is doing all that too.
		That's right.
		That's what it is.
		And so now you see how we've gotten here.
		And so now you see how we've gotten here.
		The left is bastardizing everything.
		The American left is a threat to everything that is truthful, everything that is good, the very bedrock of our country, the very cornerstones of our civilization.
		The left is a threat to everything common sense, everything truthful, everything real.
		So, yeah, they think a man can get pregnant.
		Yeah, they think a 12-year-old boy can be a girl.
		Yeah, Katenji Brown Jackson doesn't understand the First Amendment is there to restrict the government from taking our rights.
		But you do, and you know all about it because you're in the 1%.
		And it's nice to be here with you.
		It's nice to be here with you indeed.
		We're going to open up the phone lines here in a moment.
		Remember, ladies and gentlemen, everything comes to you through the Owen.gold microphone.
		And I hope you're a member of the pack at owen.gold.
		You can get mailed things like this beautiful silver dollar right here, right in your mail at a much lower price than the open market.
		It's basically like closed market.
		You can get gold backs mailed right to your personal address, just like that.
		All you got to do is go to owen.gold and become a member of the pack.
		It's the only subscription that pays you back.
		When we purchase precious metals, we purchase them as a group.
		So that gives us more purchasing power.
		That drives the price way down.
		You get more bang for your buck.
		Owen.gold, the only subscription that pays you back.
		All right, ladies and gentlemen.
		We've made it now into our number two.
		So you know what that means.
		That means we start taking your calls.
		Let's put the number on the board.
		747-25560.
		Big ups to everybody tuned in tonight on Rumble, Owen Schroyer Live.
		Give us a follow there.
		We're getting closer to 10K followers.
		That would mean a lot.
		Give us a follow.
		We want to get to 10K.
		And of course, big ups to everybody tuned in tonight on X at Owen Schroyer 1776.
		You're doing well there.
		We may pop in.
		We'll see if the Elon Musk and Missouri Attorney General live stream is still going.
		I was tuned into it.
		I was tuned into it earlier, and quite frankly, it was really clunky and quite boring, I must say.
		But we may tune into it because there was some relevant stuff there.
		But for now, let's go to the phone lines.
		You know the drill.
		Line to line.
		I pick up.
		You're on the other end.
		You let me know your name and where you're from, what state you're in, and fire away.
		So, first caller of the night.
		Relevant stuff there.
		What is your name?
		Where are you from?
		Let's go to the phone lines.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		You know the drill.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Line to line.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		Sir.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yes, we have you.
		Your name?
		Where are you from?
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		Oh, it's Kyle from Nebraska.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		How are you doing?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What's up, Kyle?
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		Hey, everybody.
		I just wanted to say there's one of the injured nurses that went to the hospital last night.
		And here on X, it'd be a T-Bird T-Money.
		I'm not sure if she ever communicated or reached out at all.
		I know one of the other nurses, I think you got someone got a hold of you.
		Anyway, she went back in the hospital up in Ontario last night for the cardiopulmonary unit.
		And I just wanted to send out some prayers to Tanya.
		She took three Pfizers.
		And that's been kind of just like weighing on me today.
		I found out a few hours ago.
		And she's in her third year.
		So she's in heart and liver failure.
		I just wanted to shout out to her.
		Thank you for pulling that up on there.
		Very much appreciate it.
		She's a warrior and she's been pushing super hard, Owen, and sending a lot of good stuff out.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, if Katenji Brown Jackson would have her way, this would be censored off the air.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You wouldn't be allowed to learn about T-Bird or her vaccine injuries because Katenji Brown Jackson thinks that in these important times, this information should be banned.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		100%.
		And what you said earlier today on the war room, when you finishing that on the show, it was just very, very powerful.
		These people, like you said, she needs to be looked at immediately.
		And there should be oversight and she should be definitely barred.
		And so should Fannie Willow.
		I mean, all these people that are getting away with these things, we're all just to the point where we've had it.
		We all feel it.
		And because of J6, they've put us in this bubble.
		And I think the only way we're going to get through this, brother, is on the small scale.
		I keep having this itchy feeling that X is getting ready to get dropped.
		I mean, something's happening.
		I can't get into half the spaces that I try to get into.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Rumble, Rumble had a problem.
		Rumble had some technical issues today, too.
		I did have some trouble getting into that X spaces with Elon Musk and the Missouri Attorney General as well.
		I eventually, after like 10 tries, was able to get it to pull up.
		But yeah, there's definitely some tech stuff.
		You know, we had to work our way through a bunch of tech stuff at band.video.
		Some of our regular audience may remember that.
		You may remember that.
		I think it's a lot smoother now, but there's no doubt when you're trying to launch something independent, the gremlins come after you.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		Am I still on here, Owen?
unidentified		Yes.
kyle in nebraska ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, if I could just say my handler is Kyle LikesTruth.
		And if you go there, I just reposted Aaron Lewis from about seven hours ago, Aaron Lewis music.
		If there's any way anybody knows Aaron is listening or on X, please get a hold of him and get him on with Owen and or Alex.
		That guy is 100% real steel, real deal Holyfield.
		He is pushing every concert, every live show, and he's saying it right.
		So I just wanted to see if, by the grace of God, we could get Aaron Lewis on your show.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that'd be wonderful.
		That'd be wonderful.
		Appreciate that idea.
		Here's the, thanks for the call.
		Here's the spaces I was mentioning earlier, the battle for free speech, Attorney General Andrew Bailey.
		Elon Musk was in there, a couple other people talking free speech.
unidentified		But it was a little clunky.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But I tuned in briefly.
		It was a little clunky.
		It had its problems.
		But I guess the good news is that people are finally getting it.
		You know, the debate is finally happening.
		People are finally getting it.
		Some of us had to go down.
		Some of us had to get censored.
		Some of us had to go to prison.
		But, you know, I don't want my speech imprisonment to happen in vain.
		I mean, if I go to prison for speech, if I go to prison as an example that, hey, in America, speech is under such assault, the Democrats will imprison you for speech.
		Then if I have to go through that, then I want other Americans to see that and learn, oh, wow, there really is an anti-free speech movement.
		There really is a threat to the First Amendment, our Bill of Rights, and our country.
		That's what I'm hoping.
		Next caller, what's your name?
		Where you from?
bart in georgia ▲ ● ▼		This is Bart Fine in Georgia, sir.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hi, Bart.
bart in georgia ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, all this talk of these American hating commies starting as the politicians and not including but not limited to the voters.
		I really think that Trump needs to get re-education camps for a lot of these people and put the criminals in prison.
		I'm serious.
		People think this is funny, but I'm serious because you got to fight fire to fire.
		You think they won't all put us in camps if they can?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, of course they will.
		They already are.
		They type it out in their hearings that Schroyer was not apologetic for saying the election was stolen.
		Okay, how about this for apologetic?
		The election was stolen.
		The election was stolen.
		The election was stolen from Trump.
		Joe Biden had an illegitimate win.
		330,000 votes in Michigan, middle of the night.
		300,000 votes, Wisconsin, middle of the night.
		350,000 votes in Georgia, middle of the night.
		Yeah, the election was stolen from Donald Trump.
		How many times do I have to say it?
		You can't censor me, but that's the problem.
		They censor you.
		You don't shut up.
		They throw you in prison.
		They don't shut up.
		You know what they do to you next?
		They kill you.
		And that's where we're going in this country.
		That's how dangerous the American left is.
bart in georgia ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Trump.
		Trump had the election stolen.
		I'll back that comment all the way.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And notice how.
		Notice how others are finally willing to say that now as well.
		And so that's a good thing.
		Some people had to cross the barbed wire first and their bloody carcasses hauled to prison.
		And more journalists are still going to prison for it, but it's the truth.
		But finally, people are starting to realize what a threat the American left is to their freedom, their country, and everything they hold dear.
		I mean, just basic common sense, the American left is a threat to.
		Self-evident.
		It's in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, self-evident, the Declaration of Independence.
		These things are self-evident.
		Your right to self-government, self-evident.
		Your right to determine your own future.
		Self-evident.
		And Judge Katenji Brown Jackson wants to be your mommy.
		Next caller, what's your name?
		Where are you from?
unidentified		Hello.
unidentified		It's me, Alexander Tentis from Idaho.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hi, Alexander.
unidentified		Yeah, I just wanted, I just want to give a couple comments.
		First thing I wanted to say, I haven't talked to you since you went in prison, but I just want to say what you did there, dude, was amazing.
		I'm sorry I'm taking us off topic, but I just want to say I thought you were extremely brave.
		And it was like the amount of balls you showed.
		And like, even my younger cousins and everyone, they were like, oh, my God.
		So I just want to say, God bless you, man.
		That was amazing.
		I hope you get to the Supreme Court.
		I hope your case goes through.
		I hope that's good.
		But on the issue with the Supreme Court going on now, honestly, at this point, I think our last hope is Trump because these people are going to, these people are going to break, I think, under the pressure if we don't break their election fraud in the end of this year.
		So that's my thought on this.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I think that politically speaking, our best hope is to take back the White House, take back Congress, and start to finally get some policy with a political party that puts Americas first.
		And really, that's the new Republican Party.
		Traditionally, through my life, the Republican Party has been just about as corrupt as the Democrats.
		Maybe not as corrupt as the Democrats, but I mean, the Republicans have been part of the uniparty system, destroying this country, selling us out for decades.
		There's a new Republican Party.
		The old right is out.
		That's why Mitch McConnell is out.
		That's why Kevin McCarthy is out.
		That's why Ronna Romney McDaniel is out.
		That's why Liz Cheney is out.
		That's why Adam Kinzinger is out.
		So there's a new Republican Party, and we actually care about the country, unlike the old Republican Party.
		So this is our chance to save this country politically.
unidentified		Yeah, one other additional thing I said, I think the Republicans confuse people because what they do is this, is they have a good like social programs where like lower taxes, a better economy, stronger dollar, but at the same time, they're like doing World War III against every other country in the world, you know, so that we don't replace King Dollar.
		And one thing I wanted to say to everyone listening is that Owen has a great thing called Owen.gold.
		Go there because here's the thing.
		The future is gold, silver, and Bitcoin.
		Gold, silver, and Bitcoin, cows and chickens.
		That's how we're going to get through this in the future by being self-sufficient and having currencies that can store our energy better.
		And if he's doing Owen.gold, own.gold, go there.
		That is a great, great deal.
		I'm going to go there myself.
		Yeah.
		I like that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Gold and silver, cows and chickens.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's right.
unidentified		Yeah.
		And Bitcoin, sir, absolutely.
		And one last thing I wanted to make, I wanted to ask you if I can make a quick comment about Israel and the whole Palestine thing, even though that's off the subject, but it's, I still have a couple of things on my mind.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, go ahead.
unidentified		Okay, yeah, I won't bemoan it too much.
		One thing I wanted to say to everyone, like one, like war is war.
		So like a lot of time, like growing up, I was seeing like the genocide that was happening, say, to the Uyghurs in China.
		I was seeing how many people starving to death each year.
		I was seeing like the hundreds of thousands of people who were getting killed in this Ukraine Russia war.
		That's a sort of like, I think of a satanic sort of genocide as well.
		And those people, if you look at the numbers with how many are just getting wiped out.
		And also, if we look at, say, Hiroshima Nagasaki or Trail of Tears, or even in the Crusades Day of Tears, what I'm trying to say is this, is that there are wars and war is this.
		And also, it's kind of weird that when we read scripture, it's like there's this all these forces that are getting us to combine to have this one moment where there's some sort of person that unites Christianity and Islam.
		And then we get this antichrist type.
		And it's just all coming into play.
		And I see this Hegelian dialectic of we're going to get on the digital system because they're wiping out the currencies.
		They're going to push against Bitcoin, but really they have some sort of backdoor in the end that where they're going to use Bitcoin to control us.
		In the end, I don't know.
		All I'm trying to say is this.
		The whole thing between Israel and Palestine, if you say, oh, genocide, genocide, I kind of view as a hypocrite because there are all these other things before.
		And then if you're American and you're saying, oh, no, no, no, they don't have the right.
		The problem is, is because it's a war between nations, not people.
		And I'm not justifying it.
		I know it's bad, but honestly, China, they have plans in the books to kill everyone in North America.
		But also, I'm kind of like a white Mexican person.
		I live all through Mexico.
		I mean, I'm children there.
		I'm going to go back there.
		I don't even like living in America.
		So, I mean, I'm just kind of giving you my view on that.
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		That's it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know, I think you bring up good points, and you might even bring a bit of my perspective into check there.
		I think that if I try to bring this back to us, the United States of America, I think what has been shown, and maybe this creates a bias in the Israel-Palestine situation.
		But I mean, if I were to ask you, if I was to ask you who has more influence over the United States foreign policy, domestic policy legislation, Israel or Palestine?
unidentified		Well, I'm going to answer that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, the here's it's not no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, it's not, it's not a difficult question.
		I'm saying who has more influence, Israel, okay, they own the banks, they own the money, so exactly.
		So, I so I think that what all of this has done is it's highlighted that as an issue.
		And where normally, I mean, normally people like myself wouldn't talk much about it.
		I wouldn't talk much about Israel influence or Jewish influence or any of that.
		It wasn't really my thing.
		And people would say, Oh, you're an Israeli shiller, all this stuff.
		I'd say, Well, no, it's just not my big issue.
		It's just not right in front of me.
		But now, there's no doubt that it's an issue that's right in front of us.
		Now, you may like it, you may not like it, but I think that there's been no doubt that that is an issue that persists and is now clogging up the political commentary in this country.
		I don't think it's, I don't think you can deny that.
unidentified		Well, I think I know why.
		I think, and I'm just going to say this last thing.
		I know this is very provocative, and I'm sorry about that, but um, here's what it is in my perspective.
		Um, I think there's a bunch of false prophets like Nick Frentes, Kanye West, even this other guy.
		They're they're they're false prophets in the sense that they say all these things, okay?
		They bulkenize people, get them into their groups, okay?
		And each one on the side lives a very demonic, satanic life.
		I mean, all you have to do is have a private dinner with Alex Jones, and I know you know him, and just ask about Nick Funtes, and he'll tell you.
		And one thing I'll say is that, you know, even to Andrew Tate, in a sense, and it's this coming from someone who like loves Andrew Tate.
		I used to email with him in 2016, 2015.
		I'm huge email trades with him.
		We were talking about Bitcoin, this, that.
		I mean, like when like he even mentioned me in one of his interviews, okay.
		He didn't realize it was me, but I was just like that one dork emailing him out of Spain because I was going to bang this one chick and her sister, and it was this whole thing.
		And I was like joking with him about it.
		But he doesn't respond to me anymore because he's world famous.
		But what I'm trying to say is that I think there's a lot of false voices out there, and they're trying to bulkenize and trick people.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, look, I could completely ignore and erase all those names off the internet that you just mentioned as false prophets, and nothing would change.
		The situation would still be the same.
		And I'm not even, I'm not even, I wouldn't even necessarily agree with you on any of that, but it doesn't matter.
		The point is, you could erase those voices off the internet, and the situation remains the same.
		Thank you for the call.
		We're about to go back to the phone lines, but you know what?
		On that issue, you know, Candace Owens has been really engaged in this commentary.
		And I think she's smart and she knows what she's doing, but she has exposed something.
		And it's hard to quite put a finger on it.
		And that's why I just use examples.
		I don't try to opinionate things.
		I just look at real examples and then I present to them, present them, and do commentary on them from an honest, a neutral, observant perspective.
		There's no doubt to me that for whatever reason, the Israel lobby, the Jewish lobby, whatever it is, it wants control over the conservative commentary and narrative.
		And it's extremely upset that they don't control the narrative in regards to Israel and Palestine.
		And now it has just avalanched into something else entirely.
		We're now just covering the Israeli-Palestine war and not supporting Israel wiping Palestine off the map.
		Somehow you're an anti-Semite.
		Just doing commentary that isn't from the Israeli perspective is anti-Semitic.
		And so really what it's doing is it's exposing a lot of people from the Jewish community.
		And I think that let me play this clip of Candace Owens and let me explain what I'm talking about here because I do everything in fairness and I like to give analogies so that it can be better understood.
		But watch what happens with this rabbi that wrote a smear hit piece lying about Candace Owens.
		She then invites him onto her show, and it goes like this.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		How dare you go into the misogynistic trope?
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		Excuse me, the anti-Semitic trope of his hag.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, did you see what he just did there?
		He immediately reached into the bag.
		He immediately reaches into the bag and says misogynistic because they're just making up excuses.
		When they can't debate you intellectually, when they can't defeat you with ideas or facts, they go to insults.
		And he reached into the bag to grab his insult, but he accidentally grabbed the long run and said misogynist.
		Oops.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		How dare you go into the misogynistic anti-Semitic trope of his hag daughter, something used throughout the late 18th and early through the early 20th century.
unidentified		Sorry, sorry, hag is now anti-Semitic.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		So that is a term of his hag daughter that goes back into the witches of Eastern Europe.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		Why did you have to call her a hag daughter?
unidentified		Just to be clear, because she's a witch.
unidentified		I think she's a witch.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		That's not because she's Jewish.
		I would call someone a hag of any color.
		I think she's a witch, what they have done over the last two years.
		I believe his daughter is a hag.
		I said that because that's what I believe.
unidentified		You may disagree with me on that, but to say that that's anti-Semitic is ridiculous.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		I would call any person a hag.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		Candace, I'm going to be very clear without trying to be insulting.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		So please forgive me.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, you already did.
		You already tried.
		You already were insulting.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		I don't want to.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		I've dealt with two years of a rabbi insulting me.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		So I'm totally with this.
unidentified		Yeah.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		I have no desire to insult anybody.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		It's a lie.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		He's lying.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		But do you understand with the history of the grim fairy tales and the folk tales of Eastern Europe?
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		I know that we know that we can go back.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now he's going to play the victim card.
unidentified		No, no, no, no, no.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		No, I'm asking a specific question that the witch archetype of those fairy tales were specifically modeled and called the Jews, that the Jews of that part of the world were called hags and witches specifically because they didn't eat the same food.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		They had different practices and they were excluded that way as part of the bloodline.
unidentified		So you are saying that we can't by calling a rabbi's daughter or a witch, a hag daughter.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		You have tapped into an anti-Semitic cult that goes back hundreds of years, whether you mean to or not.
unidentified		Okay.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		Now, now that I've told you that.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
unidentified		Okay.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, folks, again, I'm fair.
		Now, explain to me something.
		Commentary that is quite common and perfectly allowed everywhere is talking about the victim economy and talking about black Americans wanting to take advantage of the victim economy.
		Oh, we were slaves.
		Oh, systemic racism and white supremacy and all this stuff.
		And we can talk about that and we can talk about black Americans crying victim all day long.
		But what about this guy?
		What about Jews that cry victim all day long?
		Oh, you can't talk about that.
		You're anti-Semitic.
		That's exactly what he does.
		That's why he wears the yarmulke.
		That's why he's constantly reminding you about how he's a Jew.
		That's why he's constantly bringing up Jewish history and all the strife and all the troubles that they've been through for decades.
		But you're God's chosen people.
		So God chooses when you get to be successful and when you get to suffer.
		That's from your own religious text.
		That's your belief.
		So he goes on this, oh, oh, the Jews and the hags and the witches.
		And now you're conjuring up this new anti-Semitism of using the word witch.
		So no, no, no.
		You're not an anti-Semitic, you're not an anti-Semite for doing fair commentary.
		You can criticize Black Americans all day long for crying victim.
		You can criticize Black Americans all day long for using and abusing the victim economy, but not Jewish people.
		Now, let me be fair.
		Let's bring this all home before you have a visceral reaction.
		I am a Christian conservative.
		What do I and other Christian conservatives do when they see groups like the Patriot Front?
		We call it out.
		We say, this is horrible.
		This is a bad look for Christian conservatives.
		This is a bad look for Trump supporters.
		This is a bad look for Republicans.
		I don't like this.
		Why do we do that?
		Because we don't like people besmirching our movement.
		We don't like people besmirching our culture.
		We don't like people bringing negative commentary and negative perspective and views towards us.
		So why do I say that?
		Well, because I'm not an anti-Semite.
		I have plenty of Jewish people that I know, that I'm friends, that I get along with.
		And what we need to see, rather, I should say like this.
		If you're a Jewish American, you need to start condemning rabbis like this and Rabbi Shumley because they're hurting you as a good person.
		Now, this is already happening in Israel.
		There are already tens of thousands of people who are protesting what they view as a genocide in Palestine being committed by Netanyahu and the IDF.
		So they understand Israel probably has the most negative approval rating.
		Let's just say it like this.
		Israel probably has the most negative approval rating in recent history, thanks to what's happening right now in the Gaza Strip.
		And no matter how much of censorship or propaganda or lies from the ADL and Netanyahu and everybody else, no matter how much they say, it's not helping.
		And in fact, it's making it worse.
		Israel would be much better off as far as public perception was concerned if they just came out and said, we are going to wipe Palestine off the map.
		We believe we're God's chosen people.
		We believe he's promised us this land.
		So we're at war.
		We're wiping them out.
		Too bad for them.
		Good luck.
		Land is ours now.
		We're taking it.
		They would have a much higher public approval rating than crying victim after they stood down on October 7th and then committed the atrocities in the Gaza Strip and then still continue to cry victim and act like it's not going on.
		But that's what they did.
		And now anybody that gives coverage outside of supporting Israel's side is considered an anti-Semite.
		So this is why Israel's public perception, approval rating, whatever, has been so negative recently.
		And smart Jews in Israel and in America understand that.
	And they say, hey, it's not my fault if there even is anti-Semitism on the rise.
	It's not my fault.
	It's Netanyahu's fault.
	It's Israel's fault.
	It's the Israel lobby's fault.
	It's the lies.
	It's the propaganda.
	Same thing.
	If Candace Owens comes out and criticizes the black community for crying victim all the time, or criticizes the black community for being racist against white people, or criticizes the policies of diversity, equity, and inclusion that wind up with people like Ketenji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court.
	That's because Candace Owens is smart.
	And she knows as a black woman that somebody like Katenji Brown Jackson getting on the Supreme Court because she's a black woman makes all people think negatively about black women when that's how they get ahead in life, simply for being a black woman.
	So that's what's going on right now.
	And the cries of anti-Semitism and we, the Jews, are the biggest victims on the planet no longer works, but they have no other play.
	They have no other card to go to.
	And so that's why this is going on.
	That doesn't make me an anti-Semitic for doing fair commentary, but that's what they'll say.
	And if you look into it, you find out what's really behind the TikTok ban because the commentary on TikTok is anti-Israel about nine to one, probably even more.
	95% of the commentary on the struggle in Israel and Palestine is against Israel and pro-Palestine.
	That's why the Israel lobby and the ADL are trying to force the sale of TikTok so that a pro-Israel individual or Jewish person can own it and control that narrative.
	That's just the fact of the matter.
	So if I was Jewish, I would be condemning these rabbis like Rabbi Shumli and this rabbi that lied about Candace Owens and wrote a hit piece full of lies about Candace Owens because they're making Israel look bad and they're making Jews look bad.
	Just like if a black woman goes on a diatribe and says, oh, I'm black.
	I get free stuff.
	Give me free stuff at McDonald's.
	And someone says, gee, that doesn't look good.
	Same thing goes for this rabbi with that pathetic argument he makes in front of Candace Owens that saying the word hag is now anti-Semitic.
	Give me a break.
	And you know, I feel that I feel that my commentary actually weighs a lot here because for years I've been called an Israeli Jewish shill.
	For years, oh, InfoWars, Jewish shills controlled by Israel.
	All BS.
	And the truth is, I just wasn't my big issue.
	Wasn't the issue in front of me.
	I talked about I don't like Israel's influence in our foreign policy, but now here we are.
	And I'm going on.
	I don't, to be honest, I don't understand this guy's commentary anymore.
	He, I mean, he used to be, I guess, what you would call an anti-Semite.
	Now he's like a pro-Jew Semite.
	I don't even know.
	And that's Adam Green.
	Now, Adam Green basically says, oh, I was wrong about Schroyer.
	Oh, I was wrong about him.
	And now he's begging me to come on his show.
	So I'm going on his show Wednesday.
	I just call it like it is, folks.
	That's all I do.
	I just call it like it is.
	But you know, the thing about that, it seems to land you in trouble these days.
	All right, let's take another call.
	We got somebody on the line.
	Next caller, what's your name?
	Where you from?
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, this is Albert from Pennsylvania.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hey, Albert.
		Good to hear from you tonight.
		You got pants coming your way.
		Hey, resend me your information so I can get that back.
		I'm flooded with emails.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Oh, hey, yeah, no, that's not a problem.
		That's not a problem.
		And I sent in the chat, too.
		I don't know if you saw, but whoever has the second highest donation tonight, just go ahead and, you know what I mean?
		I don't want to be greedy.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Second highest donation.
		Okay, okay.
		So it would be our friend Albert.
		Second highest donation.
		Where'd the shirt go?
		Right now, it's titty pussy.
		Titty pussy has the second highest donation.
		Owen Schroyer did nothing wrong.
		Triblend, large t-shirt.
		Titty pussy has the second largest donation tonight.
		And if as long as no other donations come in, titty pussy will be the winner.
		It was only $5, so titty pussy getting a good deal unless somebody outbids him.
		And you'll get this t-shirt.
		I'll even sign it for you.
		But yeah, I got your pants coming your way soon.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Okay, yeah.
		Sounds good, Owen.
		Thank you so much again.
		And yeah, I'll resend out that email.
		But I think you did a great job kind of pointing some stuff out there just now with the whole Candace Owens thing.
		And, you know, it takes me, I read a quote.
		I think it was Voltar that said that if you want to know who controls you, you just ask yourself who you cannot criticize.
		And I think that ties in perfectly here to the whole Israel thing because, you know, and personally, I hate to categorize people at all this way, but it's almost like as if if you want to call it like the victim Olympics, it's like Israel is now like always winning gold.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, they got to remind you.
		Like it was like they could kind of just, you know, slink to the side and not be involved or whatever.
		But now with what's going on between Israel and Palestine, now they have to remind everybody, oh, no, no, no, no, we're still the biggest victims.
		We let black people be the biggest victims, but that was just us and our good graces.
		But now we're the biggest victims again.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Yo, yeah, totally, totally.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		And I just find it very, very concerning that so many conservatives or whatever seem to be taking the bait with this whole TikTok ban, which I personally think too is being kind of pushed by the Israel lobby.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		100%.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Because I mean, oh, absolutely.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		I mean, for somebody, if anybody claims to be a pro, you know, free speech, First Amendment conservative, but you sign on to the TikTok ban saying that, yeah, yeah, we got to get rid of China, then you're being extremely hypocritical because what you're basically endorsing is letting the government control what you can and cannot look at on your phone.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so that's the larger issue.
		But see, let's just hone in on this to just prove this isn't about China.
		And I've given a dozen different examples to prove this isn't really about China.
		So let me just give another one.
		This is maybe the most egregious example.
		The COVID-19 virus was made in China.
		Yet, remember how the media never wanted to say China?
		Remember how congressmen and women, Republicans and Democrats, never wanted to say China.
		Nobody was allowed to say China virus.
		You couldn't say China, even though it came from China.
		But now all of a sudden, they're all willing to say China, China, China, China when it comes to the forced TikTok sale.
		It's bogus.
albert in pennsylvania ▲ ● ▼		Oh, absolutely.
		Oh, and it's funny because before earlier this evening, I saw you post on your act there, you know, basically stating that same thing.
		And I commented back with like the meme of like Trump saying, you know, like China and, you know, how they would get on him for constantly, you know, like just, well, I mean, telling the truth that, you know, it came from China.
		And no, I just find it to be completely out of line.
		And, you know, just to kind of tie it in real quickly, you know, the difference between the new right, like us that's calling this out and the old right is that the old right was originally part of the whole establishment censorship 20 years ago when George Bush said that, you know, let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories when he was referring to 9-11.
		And, you know, I feel like, you know, that whole ideology, which is now shifted mainly to the left, is what's all behind the TikTok ban and censoring on the internet and things like that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		100%.
		But so it's the immediate issue of a lobbying group deciding that they want to force a sale of an app so they can control it.
		And then it's the aftermath of the government seizing power to control what you have access to on your phone.
		And we have to stop it right there.
		We just, it cannot go on.
		Thank you for the call, Albert.
		Always good to hear from you.
		And people say liquid bacon would be the second highest at $10 tonight, but I haven't seen him in the chat, but it's confirmed by multiple people.
		We'll see if he shows up to make his claim.
		Let's keep taking calls.
		Next caller, what's your name?
		where are you from cows and chickens Gold and silver, cows and chickens.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		You're reading more.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What's up, Rick?
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		Four comments on the Clown World shirt yesterday.
		People loving it, man.
		People loving it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, the Clown World shirt's great.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I need to, I'm going to, I'm going to eventually wear it on the show here.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		In fact, Droid 511 is like, where's the clown horn?
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		So we'll give it to him.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		There you go.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		It was bizarre because dad was visiting last week, Friday.
		We almost called you on Alex's show, but I'm like, that'll be too fucking confusing.
		We can't call on Alex's show.
unidentified		It would have been a cluster fuck.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What's on your mind tonight?
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		Well, you know, Supreme Court also blocked Texas from enforcing immigration laws until I believe appellate court rules on some matter because of some Biden admin filed emergency appeal.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the Supreme Court's against having a border.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We'll see what ends up with this free speech case, but we at least know Katenji Brown Jackson believes the government can send free speech.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		But in my hypothetical, your view has the Supreme Court hamstringed.
unidentified		She's an idiot.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		Well, listen, Jack, we hold these truths to be self.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		You know, this thing.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Biden was struggling big time again today.
		It's over the weekend.
		It's just, it's a bad state of affairs.
		It's really bad.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		9.2 billion for the illegals in New York City.
unidentified		I guess six, but wow.
unidentified		Yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, who would have thought, though?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, even you went high.
bucktooth beaver in unknown ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, no.
		Initially, I was going to say 1.2, maybe two.
		And then I started listening to you.
		And then I'm thinking it's probably six, 9.2.
		Holy shit.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		9.2 billion annually for illegal immigrants in New York.
		But the subway's falling apart.
		There's literally mountains of trash on the street.
		So that's what you get in New York City.
		It's really a sad state of affairs.
		All right.
		Next caller, what's your name?
		Where you from?
donnie in oklahoma ▲ ● ▼		Donny Colfie.
		I'll try to move fairly fast.
		I think it was in the late 80s.
		There were two West Point graduates, officers, they come up with an efficiency rate on labor.
		At the time, I was interested in running.
		I did run crews and user model for physical labor, but it doesn't take into attack mental labor.
		I think a lot of times I and other people get exhausted just not knowing when to quit.
		It's like their studies showed that physical labor was, you could do most efficient 10-hour days for six days a week.
		You had to stop.
		And I remember working before that 12 hours a day, seven days a week, and it fell off the cliff.
		Well, all this talking and yapping and mental thought, I don't know about you, but me, I need to know.
		But maybe your crew can find that or Jones's.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But anyway, well, I got news about how now multiple cities, I'm going to cover it tomorrow, are pushing for this universal basic income stuff.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, you know, you can't even work at all because it's just too hard.
donnie in oklahoma ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's just slavery.
		You know, they get us roped into this crap, this currency deal that's coming up.
		It's like you got to tell them no.
		I've already been talking to men for several years.
		I remember, you know, in the 70s, hearing about Dr. Ron Paul, a congressman, John Burke Society.
		And hey, it's here, baby.
		You know, and you're seeing it in those medals.
		I mean, I'm not doing bad on some of this.
		That's not great.
		I should have sunk a little more into it.
		But, you know, let's see.
		Hey, that I mentioned once before, you know, somebody told me I was a mean motherficker ass whipper.
		Well, I tell you what, that Robert Barnes, the lawyer, that's my modern day of a mean mother ever whooper.
		That guy's a great lawyer.
		He's probably the best.
		And it's like, you know, I'm more prepared than I was.
		I've been through a few cases on the real estate business mainly, but it's like winning, you know, and I like winning.
		But anyway, Barnes is excellent on that stuff.
		And that Norm Pattis is all right.
		I like him.
		But it's like.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm going to have an update with my attorney, Norm Pattis, this week on our movement to the Supreme Court.
		And I mean, it's honestly just crazy.
		It's just stunning how much just what they do to you throughout this process.
		And the entire purpose is to turn you off so that you don't take it to the Supreme Court, so that you don't fight the government when they do you wrong.
		It's why they make it so difficult and so expensive and make all these hoops that you got to jump through and with no guarantees for anything, unfortunately.
		So I'm going to have an update with my attorney, Norm Pattis, sometime this week.
		I'm not sure what the day is going to be on the war room, but we will have an update on that.
		And I mean, it's just, it's just nonstop with the legal stuff, whether it's me or Alex.
		It's just, it's honestly just nonstop.
		And that's another part of it.
		It's just legal warfare to keep you bogged down so that you can't just do what you need to do to tell the truth and to activate fellow patriots to try to save this country.
		So, I mean, you see how they did, Alex.
		All right, next caller.
		What's your name?
		Where are you from?
donnie in oklahoma ▲ ● ▼		Okay, there you go.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hello?
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		All right.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We'll try another one.
unidentified		Next caller, where you're from.
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		Dennis from Kentucky, bro.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hey, what's up, Dennis?
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		We figured out the numbers.
		We have the numbers for every California, Chicago, and New York.
		We see the redistricting pattern.
		We see the allocation of money.
		And we know that they're going for the electoral college seat and congressional seats.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's what they do.
		They redistrict, they redistrict so that all the congressional seats are blue.
		And then they rigged the electoral college count with illegal immigrants to ensure that California, Illinois, and New York is like a three-piece suit to electoral victory.
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		So Tyson and Amazon have been given illegal aliens that have, that's right, social security cards.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, they said they want to give them jobs.
dennis in chicago ▲ ● ▼		No, we got footage of it.
		We have footage of it.
		Now we got footage of it.
		We have a North African woman that showed up her home.
		So it's, you know, still on the card, not even torn away.
		Sure do.
		Yes, we do.
		This is for real people.
		This is not a game.
		We know, again, and I want you to understand something that 98% of the Aboriginal vote has pulled away.
		There will be, you are going to watch a segregation of identity theft of the African American.
		Guarantee you.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, most black Americans already understand how they've been lied to by the Democrats when they were promised free stuff and then they gave it to the illegals.
		And I don't know how that will result in an election, but we're seeing it at least on the streets.
		Next caller, what's your name?
		Where are you from?
unidentified		Dright 511.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, what?
		What's your name?
		Where are you from?
unidentified		This is Druid 511.
unidentified		I just got to say a thank you for calling me out with the clown horn.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right.
unidentified		So, yeah, you need to have the in-house clown horn.
		This clown horn.
		Yeah, there you go.
		No, so deep thoughts.
		So there was a thing that Biden clouded with the hydrogen stuff.
		And I'm in the industry.
		There was $80 billion that were contributed to the hydrogen industry.
		And coming from that industry, I've seen zero dollars, zero production of any no results.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, they've just, we just came out with the numbers that the Biden administration gave $9 billion, or was it $8 billion or $9 billion?
		We covered it on the Alex Jones show.
		I was filling in for Alex last Friday.
		The Biden administration gave $8 or $9 billion for electric vehicle charging stations, and they only built 10.
		My numbers are a little mixed up, but it was like $600 million per electric charging station.
		So they just steal this money.
		They just steal this money.
		That's all they do.
		They just steal it.
		All right.
		I think maybe it's time to put an end to the calls for tonight.
		And we're about to sign off, but I wanted to give you guys a little anecdote.
		You guys know I'm a big music fan, a big rock fan.
		And you know, I called Creed's re-emergence in 2024 before anybody.
		You all know it.
		You all know it.
		I said Creed 24 before anybody.
		Now they're on tour.
		Now they're booking all these shows, all these gigs, all these promotions, all these interviews.
		They are getting played on Paramount commercials.
		I saw Creed in the future.
		But did I overlook somebody else?
		Was somebody else disrespected?
		Is there something we've all been missing?
		We've all been lied to about.
		How could this be?
		I might have to reinvestigate.
		Vinny La Costo, though, will break it down for me.
unidentified		Whoever convinced the world that Nickelback sucked?
		Bravo.
		Bravo.
		Because what you did, it's possibly the greatest psyop in the history of mankind.
		Your meme, it made an entire generation lie.
		Lie to the world, to themselves, whenever they heard, never made it as a wise man.
		I couldn't make it as a Bullman Steeler.
		We'd hear those certified slobber knocker bars, slobber knocker, and we'd say they sucked.
		We didn't believe that.
		None of us did.
		And we knew it.
		We knew it.
		I fell for it.
		Of course.
		I'd get in my mom's van, turn on the radio.
		You're listening to WKXY.
		Up next, Hero by Nickelback.
		I'd roll my eyes.
		Nickelback sucks.
		They say that a hero can save us.
		I'm not gonna stand in the way he's cooking He's cooking.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let him cook.
unidentified		A tear would roll down my cheek.
		I'd look out the window of my mom's 2004 Honda Odyssey.
		I'd watch that little dude run through obstacles that I made up.
		They were so fucking sick.
		And I'd say to myself, this shit rolls.
		So, to whoever you are, kudos for making everyone embarrassed.
		For loving something.
		And not even understanding why.
		You must be punished.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Limp Biscuit's been back, Jason.
unidentified		Justice must be served.
unidentified		Because for 14 years, Nickelback, a rock and roll band that deserved our praise for making delicious jams.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Delicious.
unidentified		They were clowned.
unidentified		A fat dookie was taken on their musical genius because of a meme.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's right, Realtor Dan Grimes.
unidentified		A meme that you made.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Who did this?
unidentified		So I will find you.
		Oh.
		I will capture you.
		And I'll make you accountable.
		I built a bunker on a remote island.
		It's untraceable.
		Nobody's going to find it.
		And in that bunker, I designed a room.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, he's now he's getting too spicy now.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		He's cooking with something else now.
unidentified		It has a certain theme.
		Nickelback.
		The wallpapers?
		Nickelback.
		The rug?
		Nickelback.
		The bed sheets?
		The lampshades?
		It's all nickelback.
		I'm going to feed you.
		Don't worry.
		I hope you like Spider-Man Pop-Tarts.
		I've got plenty.
		We got to keep those pearly whites strong.
		Enjoy your Nickelback Tooth-Tunes toothbrush.
		I've got hundreds.
		Oh my gosh.
		And I know what you're thinking.
		What am I going to do in a bunker?
		I'm going to go crazy.
		I'm going to lose my mind.
		I've incorporated recreation.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But he has Nickelback.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		I'm not a monster.
unidentified		Well, there's a radio.
		It only plays Nickelback songs, but they've released 136 songs.
		You'll have plenty.
		I put in a computer.
		But you know, I gotta keep security tight.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Limoire?
unidentified		I can't have you just trying to escape, you know?
		So naturally, you'll only have access to nickelback.com.
		You understand.
		A 72-inch TV.
		LED.
		Mounted in the wall.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Nickelback concerts.
unidentified		It's got 38 channels.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All Nickelback.
unidentified		one looping a different Nickelback music video.
		The next 14 years of your life are gonna be magical.
		And we all just want to be big rocks not a living and gone out of 15 cars.
		Oh my God.
		I never thought that this would come up.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm going to have to reinvestigate, guys.
		I'm going to have to reinvestigate this entire issue now because we successfully brought back Creed.
		And rightfully so.
		By the way, Lint Biscuit never left.
		Just came out with an album a couple years ago.
		Still on tour.
		But I might have to reinvestigate Nickelback now.
		We might have to do a cold call investigation into this right now.
		It might have to happen.
		Because I'll be honest, I mean, I know some of the Nickelback hits.
		I always knew about the anti-Nickelback propaganda.
		I never really necessarily bought into it, but because of that, I never dove in headlong.
		I don't know much Nickelback deep cut.
		Maybe Saturday night.
		I liked that, but have I been denied?
		Have we been denied?
		We might have to do a little cold research into this.
		We might have to do it together right now, guys.
		And if this hits, I'm just, I just pulled up a random Nickelback song from the album Dark Horse called Something in Your Mouth.
		I've never heard this before.
		It's not about Cushy.
		I've never heard this before.
		And so we're going to, if this hits, if this slaps, this could be a sign, ladies and gentlemen.
		This, we're going to take it all the way.
		And yes, we will need the, we will need the dancing memes.
		I don't think we don't go there yet.
		Let's just wait.
		Because if this doesn't hit, we're going to have to immediately retract and then play something that I know will hit.
		But here we go.
		Is Nickelback?
unidentified		Did we?
		Oh, my.
		Fucking Nickelback.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Fucking Nickelback.
unidentified		Are you kidding me?!
		Come on.
		It hits.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yes.
unidentified		All right.
unidentified		We go.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We go.
unidentified		We take it out.
unidentified		New drop coming to Owenschawer.score next week.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		In the meantime.
unidentified		You shake your ass around for everyone.
unidentified		Fucking Nickelback.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's do the dancing memes.
unidentified		Let's go.
		And tease them all.
		Peace and help.
		You're so much cooler and you never pull it out.
		Cause you look so much cuter with something in your mouth.
		Crafty little tricks.
		Tattoos on her lip.
		If she's bending as you're spending, there's no way to do it.
		So baby, come on.
		Dressed them like a princess.
		Betting that her skin smells better than the scent of every flower in the desert.
		Come on.
rabbi michael barclay ▲ ● ▼		Every sugar daddy hitting on her all night long.
unidentified		Doesn't care about the money.
		She could be with anybody.
		Anybody else?
		You all alone.
		You shake your ass around for everyone.
		I love the way you dance with everybody.
		And tease them all by sucking on your thumb.
		You're so much cooler when you never pull it out.
		Cause you look so much cuter with something in your mouth.
		She loves the night sleeping by a cream, just living for the fun.
		Taking over every dance ball, like she's the only one.
		In the spotlight, all night, kissing everyone.
		And try to look somewhere innocent while sucking on her thumb.
		So much cooler when you never pull it out.
		So much cuter with something in your mouth.
justice ketanji brown jackson ▲ ● ▼		Nothing.
unidentified		You're ripping up the dance floor.
		You shake your ass around for everyone.
		I love the way you dance with everybody.
		And tease them all by sucking on your thumb.
		Nothing, you're ripping up the dance floor.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You shake that ass around for everyone.

▲