OSL 57 - Free Speech Faces Greatest Risks Ever Under Joe Biden And The Global Cabal
|
Time
Text
I always wonder, I know where to fly I always wonder, I know where to fly I
always wonder, I know where to fly My friends.
Let's see your dancing emojis.
Let's go.
Start it off right.
Let's go!
Oh, yeah.
All right, we're coming in tonight with a little Corp Clani.
Corpora Clanny.
Another Nordic Fult Metal Band bringing us in tonight.
I just can't help myself.
I just can't help myself.
Owen Schreuer Live, episode 57 coming to you as always through the Owen dot gold microphone.
Join the club.
Become a member of the pack at Owen.gold.
The only subscription that pays you back.
You know of any others where you join and you get paid back?
No.
Only at Owen.gold.
We got AIM316 in the house.
By the way, I still have a gift for you.
I haven't I haven't mailed it out yet, but we will mail it this week.
Good to see all my regular friends in the rumble chat.
Glad to be joined by the audience on X as well.
AIM, I got your I got your pants right here.
I still haven't mailed them out.
I think what we'll do is we'll do another giveaway tonight.
The largest.
I'm just going to pull.
I'm just going to pull.
I'm just going to pull a shirt from the merchandise.
You don't get a shirt for free.
You have to earn it.
I'm going to pull a shirt from the merchandise.
And we're gonna give this shirt away tonight to the highest rumble rant.
I don't know.
AIM 316 wins every time.
I mean, would it be fair to disqualify him because he wins every time?
So here we go, pulling it.
All right, here we go.
Biggest rumble rant tonight will be the recipient of this shirt.
Owen Schreuer did nothing wrong.
What do we got?
A size L. And the soft cotton gray.
I believe this is a tri blend.
Very nice, very soft.
Largest rumble rant tonight.
I will mail you this shirt.
I'll sign it as well if you want.
We're just gonna do, we're just gonna do merchandise giveaways.
I think every Monday night here on the show.
I think we'll just do that every Monday night.
So here we are.
Here we are talking about the issue of free speech.
I'm gonna take a lot of calls tonight, too.
This issue is not being properly discuss uh discussed or covered.
And in fact, let me even pull up.
I'm gonna pull up.
I'm gonna be monitoring the mainstream news tonight as well.
But so far, I was monitoring it before I signed on.
And nobody's really talking about this.
I don't get it.
I don't get it.
We have the biggest free speech issues happening in our country right now, and it barely gets any media attention.
Now, the easy explanation would perhaps be the same explanation.
They're all talking about the bloodbath.
All of them are sitting around talking about the bloodbath lie.
That's all it is.
That's been the top story all night.
I get it.
The fake news lies about Trump.
They're also attacking him with the judicial system.
We get it.
So this has been the top story on every show all night long.
And if it's the liberal anti-Trump media, it's how Trump said bloodbath.
If it's the conservative right wing media, it's about how the left is lying about the context of Trump saying bloodbath.
And all of it should be irrelevant by now.
So why won't the mainstream media touch the issue of free speech?
Because it's not real to them yet.
The average television host, the issue of free speech is not real to them.
In other words, they're not being censored off the internet, and they're not being arrested and incarcerated for their speech.
So it's just not real to them yet.
The minute Sean Hannity gets censored off the internet, the minute Sean Hannity gets arrested for his speech, then it'll be a big deal to him.
But until then, not so much.
Same with the average Congressman or woman.
Same with the average talk show host, TV, radio, internet, it's all the same.
But there was a significant news story today.
There was an extremely significant news story today.
Dealing with Kotenji Brown Jackson, who clearly doesn't belong on the Supreme Court, nowhere near it.
The only reason, the only reason why Katenji Brown Jackson is on the Supreme Court is because she's black.
She might also be a gay.
I don't even know.
But it's all because she's a black woman.
That's it.
And Biden promised he'd put a black woman on the Supreme Court.
Not the most qualified, not with the most experience, not who deserves it or earned it, but a black woman.
Justice Kotenji Brown Jackson, who doesn't know what a woman is.
She's got plenty of bling, though.
She knows how to rock some bling, doesn't she?
Doesn't know what a woman is.
Justice Kotenji Brown Jackson backs government censorship.
First Amendment hamstringing government in significant ways.
So I guess you got to get rid of that pesky First Amendment, don't you?
I guess you just got to get rid of that pesky old First Amendment because it's in your way.
You want to censor American speech, but that First Amendment is in your way.
Now, of course, this opinion, this argument disqualifies her from the Supreme Court, if not the judicial bench altogether.
If you don't understand the basic concept of the First Amendment, if you don't understand the basic concept of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, if you don't understand the Declaration of Independence, if you don't understand that the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is there to block government from taking our rights, endowed by our creator, by God, then you don't belong anywhere near the bench.
Now, this is part of the Supreme Court case to decide on whether the government can coerce social media companies to censor content it doesn't like, including dissenting views on COVID-19 and election integrity.
Now, this all stems from the Biden administration, the Biden regime, the Biden circus, where they were sending out emails and notifications telling social media companies to censor information on COVID, to censor information on COVID treatments, the vaccine, to censor information on Hunter Biden's laptop and the 2020 election and the 2021 results.
The Democrats censoring your free speech.
The Democrats censoring your free speech.
And Kotenji Brown Jackson says, well, yeah, the government should censor speech, but that First Amendment is in the way.
And as C.S. Hollywood points out in the chat, yeah.
Me covering this case could affect my case going in front of the Supreme Court.
But see, here's the thing about that.
I have to live with this.
Most of what I do now is scrutinized by the highest levels of government.
Whenever I talk about the Supreme Court, whenever I talk about the Biden administration, whenever I talk about certain prosecuting attorneys, district attorneys, what have you, I am under the scrutiny of the federal government, and anything I say can be used or will be used against me to try to throw me in jail again.
Trust me.
I've been basically told so much.
So I had to make a decision.
I have two options.
I guess maybe you could say three.
But I basically have two options.
Either I continue to do my news coverage and my commentary, not in fear of being punished by the government for it.
Even though that's a very real scenario that I've already been faced with, talk about free speech being under attack.
Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself, but since it gets brought up in the comments, I can either continue to do my news coverage and my commentary without being fearful of being thrown back in jail by the federal government, which is a threat every day, or I can censor myself.
I can live in fear of the government throwing me back in jail, which is what they want, therefore hurting my coverage, hurting my commentary, and not delivering the information in the manner in which you tune in to receive it.
So really those are my two options.
Now, the third option would be try to have your cake and eat it too, but really that's just option two, isn't it?
Try to cover the issues, but not go all the way in.
Try to tell the truth, but not too much that it risks me getting incarcerated again.
Try to cover the issues, but not too much that it risks me getting incarcerated again.
So, yes, I realize when I cover certain stories, when I cover certain issues, when I name certain names, I yet again risk my own life and risk being thrown in jail again.
Because keep in mind, I'm on federal probation, the strictest federal probation until the end of the year.
And I can't even cover that in its entirety for certain reasons.
You will have to wait until my probation is over until I give you the full coverage of what's really going on behind the scenes.
But believe me, they'd love to throw me in jail.
But getting back to the point, so I'm covering this.
I'm speaking Negatively of Contenji Brown Jackson.
I'm saying she doesn't belong on the bench.
I'm saying the only reason she's on the bench is because she's a black woman.
I could have my case in front of the Supreme Court by this summer.
And do you think this commentary and talking like this about Brown Jackson is going to help or hurt my case?
Of course it's not going to help my case.
Of course, Brown Jackson is going to find out who I am and how I cover her, and she's going to rule against me.
It's likely that she would do that anyway.
But that's where we're at.
And by the way, you know, it's crazy what you learn about the legal world.
Thank you.
Because the whole system is set up for you to fail.
In ways that you can't even imagine until you deal with it firsthand.
But I'll come back to that.
Back to the Supreme Court justice that says the First Amendment is in the way of government censoring you.
Yeah, that's the law.
It's not that the First Amendment is in the way.
The First Amendment is stopping the government from censoring me.
That's the entire point of the First Amendment.
But this is why Democrats want to get rid of the First Amendment.
This is like the Supreme Court will say, well, gee, I'd love to disarm every American, but that dang Second Amendment is in the way.
So in other words, we need to change the First Amendment.
We need to change the Second Amendment.
We need to get rid of the First Amendment.
We need to get rid of the Second Amendment.
Liberal Supreme Court justice couldenji Brown Jackson appeared to support government censorship during oral arguments on Monday, claiming her biggest concern is the First Amendment hamstringing the government.
Exactly.
She doesn't like the First Amendment.
Her biggest concern is the First Amendment.
Not that the government is censoring speech.
By the way, it'd be one thing if the government it still would be free speech.
I'd still be against it.
But this would be an entirely different story if the government was censoring actual false information or foreign propaganda.
This is the U.S. government censoring free speech, censoring the truth.
This is the U.S. government.
This is the Democrats.
This is the Biden regime censoring the truth.
Not censoring foreign propaganda, even.
Not censoring violent or hateful speech, which is legal anyway.
This is the government censoring truth.
Truth.
So they got to get rid of the First Amendment because they want to censor the truth.
This should be your biggest story tonight, not the fake news bloodbath.
The Supreme Court heard arguments on the Biden Justice Department's appeal of the Murphy v.
Missouri case, where numerous states, not just Missouri, numerous states accuse Democrat officials in the Biden administration of pressuring social media companies to unconstitutionally censor conservative viewpoints on topics like COVID-19 and election integrity.
Oh, don't speak freely about COVID-19.
If, oh, if a Democrat wins an election, you're not allowed.
You're not allowed to question it.
And the Democrats are going to come censor you if you do, or imprison you in my case.
Because see, they already censored me off all social media.
When all of this was going on, I was censored on all social media, but I kept talking.
So after they censor you and you keep talking, they throw you in prison.
The United States argued that White House communications staffers, the Surgeon General, the FBI, and the U.S. Cybersecurity Agency are among those who coerced social media platforms to censor content.
At one point, Brown Jackson claimed that certain situations may warrant government censorship.
Oh, but the First Amendment is in her way.
Quote, whether or not the government can do this depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence.
There may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
Really?
Does it say that in the First Amendment?
Do I need maybe we need to bring up the First Amendment?
Because I don't remember seeing that anywhere.
Do you?
I don't remember seeing that anywhere in the First Amendment.
Hmm.
Let's see what we have here.
Let me see.
Here.
Okay.
First Amendment.
Fundamental freedoms.
Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or a bridging the freedom of speech or the press or the right of the people peacefully to assemble and to petition the government for redress of grievances.
Hmm.
I don't see anything in there like Kotenji Brown Jackson is saying, except maybe on the internet, except maybe when it goes against a Democrat narrative, except maybe when it comes to election integrity, except maybe when it comes to information on a virus or a treatment of a virus.
I don't see that anywhere.
Huh.
I must I'm I'm missing it, guys.
But I I I'm not seeing that anywhere in the First Amendment.
That's odd.
Hmm.
Maybe there's something else I could find here.
Okay.
Maybe I'm missing something.
Maybe there's an answer in the declaration of independence that I can find here.
The preamble.
We hold these truths to be self-evident.
Common sense, self-evident, common sense.
We all understand this.
That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator, God, with certain unalienable rights.
That among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
See, these things used to be considered self-evident, meaning common sense.
Everyone understood it, everyone agreed.
These rights are endowed by God, the Creator, God, not government.
Our rights come from God, not government.
God, the creator.
Unalienable.
Not to be alienated, not to be separated from, not to be removed from life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
But somehow, a Supreme Court justice doesn't agree.
Somehow, a Supreme Court justice asks the question in an oral argument on a free speech case.
Whether or not the government can do this, censor speech.
Depends on the application of our First Amendment.
What application?
Either you believe in it or you don't.
There might be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
I don't see that in the First Amendment.
I see the exact opposite.
I see unalienable.
I see endowed by the Creator.
I see self-evident.
Judge Katenji Brown Jackson sees none of the above.
Judge Katenji Brown Jackson says, well, maybe sometimes we can censor.
Maybe sometimes that is the application.
hmm Hmm.
So not only do they want to censor, they want to coerce.
They want to be able to censor, and if they can't outright censor, they want to be able to coerce.
Here is...
Some of the actual audio from the oral arguments.
From injustice Kotenji Brown Jackson.
Um Mr. Fletcher, um, depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence, and there may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise.
I mean, do you do you do you disagree that we would have to apply strict scrutiny and determine whether or not there is a compelling interest?
She's an idiot!
And how the government has tailored uh its regulation?
Certainly, Your Honor.
I think at the end of every First Amendment analysis, you'll have the strict scrutiny framework, in which, you know, in some national security hypos, for example, the government way well be able to demonstrate a compelling interest, may well be able to demonstrate.
All right, so so not every situation will in which the government engages in conduct that ultimately has some effect on uh free on on speech necessarily becomes a First Amendment violation, correct?
Maybe not necessarily, Your Honor.
I guess the top line question I would ask is has the government set out to abridge the freedom of speech?
And in this case, you see that time and time again, because if you control the test for First Amendment violation, this flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, right?
No, I understand, but we have a we have a test for a determination of whether or not the First Amendment is actually violated.
So in such certain situations, um uh, you know, the government can actually require that speech be suppressed if there's a compelling interest, right?
It can, your honor.
She asked the question, but she doesn't give an example.
Is the coercion is the state action, right?
That's the question in this case.
And I would urge the court to address the state action issue just like you addressed it in Bantu Books.
Use that term four times in Bantam books.
I mean, come on us to understand because it seems like uh an extremely expansive argument, I must say.
Now, why does she sound like a valley girl when she does all this?
Justice Jackson?
So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time period.
Why isn't that your view?
I mean, what would what would you have the government do?
I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, um, is not gonna get it done.
And so uh I guess some might say that you're not our big brother, you're not our daddy.
To take steps.
Did you hear that?
The citizens of this country can listen to this notion.
Justice Kotenji Brown Jackson takes it upon herself to become my daddy.
Justice Brown Jackson thinks it's the government's job to be your mommy, to be your daddy, to be your big brother, to be your authority figure.
That's what she's asserting right here.
Listen again.
Post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, um, is not gonna get it done.
I'm not your kid.
The American people are not your children.
You are a Supreme Court justice meant to uphold the law of the land, which at the highest level is the U.S. Constitution, and you are going against it now and saying, oh, the first amendment hamstrings government's ability to censor speech.
That's the entire point.
But it doesn't just hamstring, it blocks.
So here Kotenji Brown Jackson is arguing that she's your mommy, and she knows what's best for you, and she believes the government can determine what's best for you.
And she also says the quiet part out loud that the first amendment is in her way.
She wants to censor you, but the first amendment is in her way.
This is how Democrats think.
This is how liberals think.
So what's the conclusion?
If they want to censor you, get rid of the First Amendment.
And so I I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government, encouraging or even pressuring uh platforms to take down harmful information.
So can you help me?
Because I'm really I'm I'm really worried about that.
Let's listen to this again.
What is the government's duty?
What is the government's duty?
Is it the government's duty to keep you safe?
No.
Is it the government's duty to make sure there aren't words that might hurt you?
No.
What is the government's duty?
To protect your rights.
That's the government's duty.
Justice Kutenji Brown Jackson is an embarrassment.
She is a shame.
She is a complete and utter clown with this oral argument.
And she shows here that she not only doesn't understand the Bill of Rights, she doesn't respect the Bill of Rights.
And she lets the entire liberal ideology out of the bag.
Government wants to be your daddy.
Government wants to run your life.
And they believe it's their duty to do so.
What does it all equate to?
Democrats want to be authoritarians.
Liberals want to be totalitarians.
They don't even hide it.
Listen again to what Supreme Court Justice Katenji Brown Jackson thinks the government's duty is.
...country, and you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information.
So can you help me?
Because I'm really I'm going to be able to do that.
Oh, is that funny?
Who would say?
So I guess some might say that the government actually has a dude.
Who?
Who would say?
Who would say that the government has a duty to censor my speech?
Who would say that the government has a duty to keep me safe?
Who would say that?
Some might say I'm a valley girl that got through school and onto the Supreme Court because I'm a black woman.
And I'm up here completely overthrowing the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, pretending to be an intellectual, pretending to be philosophical.
Some might say it's the government's duty to be your daddy.
Some might say it's my duty to be your mommy.
She says, Oh, you can't just tell kids not to do something.
You have to enforce it.
You're not our parents.
Some might say the government has a duty to do this.
Who might say a liberal authoritarian like Katenji Brown Jackson?
It's a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country.
And you seem to be suggesting that that duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information.
So can you help me?
Because I'm really, I'm I'm really worried about that.
Um, because you've got the first amendment operating.
Um, operating of threatening circumstances.
It's uh oh, the first amendment is operating, guys.
It's not enshrined in law by the Constitution.
It's not, it's not the cornerstone of our country, it's just operating.
So she wants to stop it from operating.
Because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective, and you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems.
And your honor, I understand that in scene that I guess what I tell you is the That is that is an unbelievable oral argument.
She says it all right there.
Justice Jackson?
We're gonna hear whether or not the government can do this.
This is my biggest I mean, this is just unbelievable.
It's just unbelievable.
She doesn't even hide it.
A Supreme Court justice believes that it's the government's role to be your parents, a Supreme Court Justice thinks that the First Amendment is in the way of government censorship, and so she wants to get rid of it.
A Supreme Court Justice thinks it's the government's duty to run your life talk about dangerous.
But she goes on, she wasn't even done there.
Now she tells you how she really feels about the First Amendment.
Justice Jackson?
So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods.
I mean, what would what would you have the government do?
I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, um, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it.
Um, is not gonna get it done.
Yeah, the entire point of the First Amendment is to stop government from taking our rights.
That's the entire bill of rights.
That's the entire purpose.
What doesn't Supreme Court Brown Jackson get?
Justice Jackson?
So my biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods.
That's when the First Amendment is the most important.
This is a faux intellectual, this is a faux philosophical pretending to be smart.
Stunning.
Stunning.
That is just simply stunning.
And I think Justice Alito was a little stunned by it.
And I see that uh the White House and federal officials are repeatedly saying that Facebook and the federal government should be partners.
We're on the same team.
Officials are demanding answers.
I want an answer, I want it right away.
When they're unhappy, they they curse them out.
Uh, there are regular meetings, there is constant pestering of of Facebook and some of the other platforms, and they want to have regular meetings, and they suggest why don't you uh they suggest rules that should be applied, and why don't you tell us everything that you're gonna do so we can help you and we can look it over?
And I thought, wow, I cannot imagine federal officials taking that approach to the the print media, uh representatives over there.
If you if you did that to to them, what do you think the reaction would be?
And so I thought, you know, the only reason why this is taking place is because the federal government has got Section 230 and antitrust in its pocket, and it's uh to mix my metaphors, and it's got these big clubs available for available to it, and so it's treating uh Facebook and these other platforms like their subordinates.
Would you do that to the to the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal or the Associated Press or any other big newspaper or wire service?
So uh there's a lot packed in there.
I want to give you one very specific answer first and then brought step back out to the broader context.
So specifically, you mentioned demanding an answer right away and cursing them out.
The only time that happens is in an email that's about the president's own Instagram account.
It's not about moderating other people's.
Okay, we'll put that aside.
There's all the rest.
It's constant, meetings constant, emails we want answers, we're partners, we're on the same team.
Do you think that uh the print media uh regards themselves as being on the same team as the federal government?
Partners with the federal government.
So potentially in the context of an effort to get Americans vaccinated during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic.
Oh, there it is!
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no You don't get away with that.
Oh, once in a lifetime pandemic.
Oh, once in a lifetime election.
I wants in a lifetime news story.
I wants in a lifetime this.
I just checked the first amendment.
I I've read the Constitution.
I I've read the Bill of Rights.
I just I've read the Declaration of Independence.
We just I don't believe anywhere in there that says once in a lifetime pandemic, once in a lifetime virus, once in a lifetime election, once in a lifetime this, once in a lifetime.
Uh no, I don't I don't believe that ever happened because now you understand the precedent.
Certainly you understand the danger of that precedent.
Now there's a quote unquote once in a lifetime anything.
And the government has to get involved in coercion and manipulation and deception and censorship.
And of course, we can't allow that.
And it doesn't exist in the founding documents.
It doesn't exist in the Constitution.
It doesn't exist in the Bill of Rights.
No.
No, a pandemic does not change the Bill of Rights.
And election result that you like or dislike does not change the Bill of Rights.
These people should be tossed out of the Supreme Court post-haste.
These people should be tossed out.
I mean physically tossed.
I mean thrown to the stairs.
And Americans should be outside with rotten tomatoes to be raining down on them.
These anti-American commie scum politically.
Oh, but oh, that's my free speech.
That'll probably land me in jail.
Principles, but it's relevant to how they apply here.
And I think it's important to understand that at this time, this was a time when thousands of Americans were still dying every week, and there was a hope that getting everyone vaccinated could stop the pandemic.
These people don't give a damn if you die.
Don't spare me your oh, we were trying to stop people from dying.
No, you weren't.
You don't give a damn when Americans die.
You don't give a damn when illegal immigrants kill Americans.
You don't give a damn with all the crime in the inner cities.
You don't give a damn when an American dies from one of your vaccines.
You don't give a damn about Americans dying, you lying scum.
This is just, oh my gosh, this is infuriating.
And there was a concern that's a good idea.
Oh, yeah.
And if you really wanted to stop people from dying for COVID, why did you stop Ivermectin?
Why did you stop zinc and vitamin D?
Why did you stop that?
Americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms, and the platforms were promoting, not just posting promoting bad information.
So what?
So there it is.
So the government wants to be your daddy.
The government wants to be the arbiter of what you see and what you don't see.
For just like why they want to get rid of TikTok, because they don't control it.
They don't care about China.
China owns Apple.
Most of our products manufactured, China.
Most of our goods, China, most of our prescription pills, China.
They don't say a damn about that.
They can't control the narrative on TikTok.
That's why they're trying to force a sale of it.
And I know the objectives were good.
But but once again, they were also getting their news from the print media and the broadcast media and cable media.
And I just can't imagine the federal government doing that to them.
But maybe I'm naive.
Maybe that goes on behind the scenes.
Ah, indeed.
Struck me as wow, this is not what I understand the relationship to be.
That's all I but I do.
I think this is important because I have the same reaction that you do that these emails look unusual.
I think the idea that there'd be back and forth between the government and the media isn't unusual at all.
When the White House press secretary on July 16th is asked about this by No, no, no, no, no.
This isn't some back and forth.
This isn't back and forth between the White House and the media, the government and the media.
This is the government coercing censorship of the media, censorship of truth.
What she says is, of course, we talk to the platforms just the way we talk to all of you when we have concerns about what you're doing, when we have information that you might find helpful.
Now, there's an intensity of the back and forth here, and there's an anger that I think is unusual, but the context.
Oh, yeah, why are you so angry that the government wants to take away your free speech?
Why are you so angry that the government censors the truth?
And I'm sorry, where is the Hunter Lab Hunter Biden laptop and all this?
Because is that real or fake?
I can't decide.
Because first they said it was fake, then Hunter Biden sued to get his laptop back because it was real, but now they're saying it's fake again.
So which one is it?
I think is that these platforms were saying publicly we want to help.
We think we have a responsibility to give people accurate information and not bad information, and we're doing everything.
No, that's not the government's duty at all.
That's where this language of partnership comes from.
It's not just from the White House, it's these platforms which are powerful, sophisticated entities saying we're doing the best we can.
And the anger, I think really most of the anger when you read the emails, and I appreciate that you have, because I think you have to look at them in context.
The anger is when the officials think that the platforms are not being transparent about the scope of the problem or aren't giving information that's available.
No, your anger, the Democrats' anger is that information is getting out that hurts their agenda.
Information is getting out that hurts their narrative.
That's why they're angry.
The American people are angry because our First Amendment is being violated, and we have criminals that run our government.
And they want to shut anybody down that calls it out.
That's why they censor me off the internet.
*Bell rings* That's why they throw me in prison.
That is stunning stuff.
Thank you.
It's funny when Justice Salito says, oh, maybe this does happen at print media.
Bingo.
Maybe this does happen with cable media.
Bingo.
Barack Obama made it legal for the government to censor and promote propaganda.
So yeah, that does go on, unfortunately.
That does go on.
Thank you.
It's not that, well, maybe you are naive.
But see, this is what I constantly talk about, and it's a source of much of our frustration.
You'd think, you would think that somebody sitting on the Supreme Court would be as informed or smart as you are, or as passionate about your patriotism and country as you are, but they're not.
The average judge in this country has no clue what's even going on, folks.
They don't have a clue.
Most attorneys are either corrupt or ignorant.
They don't understand anything that's going on.
If you can keep up with my commentary or my news coverage that I do on a daily basis, you are quite literally in the top 1% of politically informed and understood people in the country.
And that includes United States judges, district attorneys, prosecuting attorneys, U.S. attorneys.
One percent.
One percent.
That's not because I'm some sort of a genius or you're some sort of a genius.
You just care.
You just follow information.
You just understand the picture and the threat.
You just have a survival instinct.
If you keep up with my political commentary on InfoWars and right here on Rumble, you are in the top 1% of the politically informed and understood people in the United States of America.
And I got news for you.
There are not very many judges on this 1%.
There are not very many U.S. attorneys on this 1%.
They do not have a clue.
I mean, just the attorneys that I work with when I hire them don't even understand or believe half the stuff.
And then they have to go through it with me.
Then they have to go through it with me just to get an understanding of it.
And then they say, whoa, this stuff you talk about, it is real.
This is really what's going on.
Whoa, now I understand this.
Now I understand that.
So I at least give Justice Allegro credit because he says, well, I can't imagine this going on at print media or TV or cable news media, but maybe I'm naive.
Maybe it does.
Bingo.
See, that's somebody who's actually trying to be philosophical and intellectual, but honest that he might not know or understand everything, and that he might be naive about something.
Just like we all should be.
The Smith Munt Act.
Was that the prop the Smith Munt Act?
Was that the propaganda act by Obama?
I believe it was.
Barack Obama with the Smith Munt Act.
I don't think he wrote it, but he brought it back to law, saying that the U.S. government can propagandize the American people.
And then, of course, his administration used it at will.
Spied on President Trump, lied about President Trump.
So look.
You can have a debate about censorship when it comes to private companies.
You can have a debate about censorship when it comes to private companies.
You can have that debate.
Not with the U.S. government.
There is no debate.
Debate was our the debate was already settled in the founding of this country with the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights in the U.S. Constitution.
So there is no debate.
The debate is settled.
But if you're a liberal Supreme Court justice, you think the debate is still on.
And you think the First Amendment is in the government's way to censor speech.
And so therefore what?
It should be removed.
The arguments made and heard by Kotenji Brown Jackson should be immediately disqualifying for any further role, not only on the Supreme Court, but in the judicial system at large.
She should be disbarred and removed from the bench immediately.
But again, most people aren't even paying attention to this.
They don't even know what's going on, which brings us back to the 1%.
And here we are.
And here we are.
Most of the political media in America have no idea this is going on.
Most of the judges, most of the attorneys in America have no idea any of this is even going on.
But you do.
Because you're in the 1%.
Thank you.
And it's an honor to be here with you.
We'll finish up with our coverage of this.
And then I will take some phone calls.
Here's Representative Jim Jordan talking about this incredible oral argument from Kotenji Brown Jackson earlier today.
I just came from the argument.
I will tell you that there was one line that I still can't believe Judge Jackson said this, but she actually said to the solicitor general from Louisiana, she said, you've got the First Amendment hamstringing the government.
Now think about that.
What?
That's the whole thinking purpose.
Like it's supposed to the government's not supposed to mean the fact that you have a person on the United States Supreme Court make that statement in the arguments on a case about censorship.
And the first amendment, it's just like I'm like, at one point, I I can only know what to say.
Like how can you say that statement?
That's like the problem with the second amendment is it's going to make the government afraid of coming to your house to take your guns away.
I just came from the argument.
I will tell you.
That would be like a doctor not knowing when a woman is.
That would be like a doctor thinking that a man can get pregnant.
That would be like a doctor telling you that a 12-year-old boy is actually a girl.
He just needs to cut him up with a knife.
Oh, wait.
The left is doing all that too.
That's right.
That's what it is.
And so now you see how we've gotten here.
And so now you see how we've gotten here.
The left is bastardizing everything.
The American left is a threat to everything that is truthful, everything that is good, the very bedrock of our country, the very cornerstones of our civilization.
The left is a threat to everything common sense, everything truthful, everything real.
So, yeah, they think a man can get pregnant.
Yeah, they think a 12-year-old boy can be a girl.
Yeah, Katenji Brown Jackson doesn't understand.
The First Amendment is there to restrict the government from taking our rights.
Thank you.
But you do, and you know all about it because you're in the one percent.
And it's nice to be here with you.
It's nice to be here with you indeed.
We're gonna open up the phone lines here in a moment.
Remember, ladies and gentlemen, everything comes to you through the Owen.gold microphone.
And I hope you're a member of the pack at Owen.gold.
You can get mailed things like this beautiful silver dollar right here, right into your mail at a much lower price than the open market.
This basically like closed market.
You can get gold backs mailed right to your personal address, just like that.
All you gotta do is go to Owen.gold and become a member of the pack.
It's the only subscription that pays you back.
When we purchase precious metals, we purchase them as a group.
So that gives us more purchasing power.
That drives the price way down.
You get more bang for your buck.
Owen.gold, the only subscription that pays you back.
All right, ladies and gentlemen.
We've made it now into our number two.
So you know what that means.
That means we start taking your calls.
Let's put the number on the board.
747, 25560.
Big ups to everybody tuned in tonight on Rumble.
Owen Schroyer Live.
Give us a follow there.
We're getting closer to 10K followers.
That would mean a lot.
Give us a follow.
We want to get to 10K.
And of course, big ups to everybody tuned in tonight on X at Owen Schroyer 1776.
You're doing well there.
We may pop in.
We'll see if the Elon Musk and Missouri Attorney General live stream is still going.
I was tuned into it.
I was tuned into it earlier, and quite frankly, it was really clunky and quite boring, I must say.
But we may tune into it because there was some relevant stuff there.
But for now, let's go to the phone lines.
You know the drill.
Line to line, I pick up, you're on the other end.
You let me know your name and where you're from, what state you're in, and fire away.
So first caller of the night.
Relevant stuff there.
What is your name?
Where are you from?
Let's go to the phone lines.
You know the drill.
Line to line.
I sir.
Yes, we have you.
Your name?
Where are you from?
Oh, that's Kyle from Nebraska.
How are you doing?
What's up, Kyle?
Hey, everybody.
I just wanted to say.
Um there's one of the injured nurses that went to the hospital last night.
And here on uh on X. It'd be uh T Bird T Money.
I'm not sure if she ever communicated or reached out at all.
Um, I know one of the other nurses.
I think you got someone got a hold of you.
Anyway, she went back in the hospital up in Ontario last night for the cardio pulmonary unit.
And I just wanted to send out some prayers to uh Tanya.
Um she took three Pfizers.
And uh that's been kind of just like weighing on me today.
I found out a few hours ago, and she's in her third year.
Um, so she's in heart and liver failure.
Um I just wanted to shout out to her.
Thank you for pulling that up on there.
Very much appreciated.
Um, she's a warrior, and she's been pushing super hard, Owen.
Um, and sending a lot of good stuff out.
But one more.
Well, if Katenji Brown Jackson would have her way, this would be censored off the air.
You wouldn't be allowed to learn about T Bird or her vaccine injuries because Kotenji Brown Jackson thinks that in these important times, this information should be banned.
100%.
And what you said earlier today on the war room, when you're finishing that on the show, I was just very, very powerful.
These people, like you said, she needs to be uh looked at immediately.
And um, there should be oversight, and she should be definitely barred.
Um, and so should Stanny Willow.
I mean, all these people that are getting away with these things, um, we're all just to the point where we've had it.
We all feel it.
And because of J6, they've put us in this bubble.
And I think the only way we're gonna get through this, brother, is uh on the small scale.
I keep having this itchy feeling that X is getting ready to get dropped.
I mean, something's happening.
I can't get into half the spaces that I try to get into.
Yeah, Rumble, Rumble had a problem.
Rumble had some technical issues today, too.
Um, I did have some trouble getting into that X spaces with Elon Musk and the Missouri attorney general as well.
I eventually, after like 10 tries, was able to get it to pull up.
But yeah, there's definitely some tech stuff.
You know, we had to work our way through a bunch of tech stuff at Band.video.
Some of our regular audience may remember that.
Uh you may remember that.
I think it's a lot smoother now, but there's no doubt when you try to launch something independent, the um the gremlins come after you.
Hey, am I still on here, Owen?
Yes.
Yeah, if I could just uh just say uh my uh my handler is Kyle likes truth.
And um, if you go there, I just reposted Aaron Lewis from about seven hours ago.
Aaron Lewis music.
If there's any way anybody knows Aaron that's listening or on on X, please get a hold of him and get him on with Owen and or Alex.
Um that guy is a hundred percent real steal, real deal Holyfield.
He is pushing every concert, every live show, and he's uh he's saying it right.
So I just wanted to see if um, by the grace of God, we could get Aaron Lewis on your show.
Yeah, that'd be wonderful.
That'd be wonderful.
Appreciate that idea.
Here's the uh thanks for the call.
Here's the spaces I was mentioning earlier.
The battle for free speech, attorney general Andrew Bailey, Elon Musk was in there, a couple other people talking free speech.
Um, but it was a little clunky.
But uh I tuned in briefly.
It was a little clunky, it had its problems.
But I guess the good news is that people are finally getting it.
You know, the debate is finally happening, people are finally getting it.
Some of us had to go down, some of us had to get censored, some of us had to go to prison.
But, you know, I I don't want my speech imprisonment to happen in vain.
I I mean, if I go to prison for speech, if I go to prison as an example that, hey, in America, speech is under such assault, the Democrats will imprison you for speech.
Then if I have to go through that, then I want other Americans to see that and learn, oh wow, there really is an anti-free speech movement.
There really is a threat to the First Amendment, our Bill of Rights in our country.
That's what I'm hoping.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where you're from.
This is Bart Fine in Georgia, sir.
Hi, Bart.
Yeah, all this talk of these American hating commies starting in the in as the politicians and not including but not limited to the voters.
I really think that Trump needs to get re-education camps for a lot of these people and put the criminals in prison.
I'm serious.
People think this funny, but I'm serious because you got to fight fire to fire.
You think they won't all put us in camps if they can?
Well, of course they will.
They already are.
They they they type it out.
Exactly.
They type it out in their hearings that Schreuer was not apologetic for saying the election was stolen.
Okay, how about this for apologetic?
Um, the election was stolen, the election was stolen.
The election was stolen from Trump.
Joe Biden's Joe Biden had an illegitimate win.
Uh 330,000 votes in Michigan, middle of the night.
300,000 votes Wisconsin, middle of the night, 350,000 votes in Georgia, middle of the night.
Uh, Yeah, the election was stolen from Donald Trump.
How many times do I have to say it?
You can't censor me.
But that's the problem.
They censor you, you don't shut up.
They throw you in prison, they don't shut up.
You know what they do to you next?
They kill you.
And that's where we're going in this country.
That's how dangerous the American left is.
Yeah, Trump, Trump had the election stolen.
I'll I'll back that comment all the way.
And notice how stole it from Trump.
Notice how others are finally willing to say that now as well.
And so that's a good thing.
Some people had to cross the barbed wire first, and their bloody carcasses hold the prison, and more journalists are still going to prison for it, but it's the truth.
But finally, people are starting to realize what a threat the American left is to their freedom, their country, and everything they hold dear.
I mean, just basic common sense the American left is a threat, too.
Self-evident.
It's in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights.
Self-evident, the declaration of independence.
These things are self-evident.
Your right to self-government, self-evident.
Your right to determine your own future.
Self-evident.
And Judge Kotenji Brown Jackson wants to be your mommy.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where are you from?
Hello, um, it's me, uh Alexander Tenthis from Idaho.
Hi, Alexander.
Yeah, I just wanted I just want to give a couple comments.
First thing I wanted to say, I haven't talked to you since you went in prison, but I just want to say what you did there, dude, was amazing.
I'm sorry I'm taking us off topic, but I just want to say I thought you were extremely brave, and it was like the amount of balls you showed, and like even my younger cousins and everyone, they were like, oh my God.
So I just want to say, God bless you, man.
That was amazing.
I hope you get to the Supreme Court.
I hope your case goes through.
I hope that's good.
But on the issue with uh the Supreme Court going on now, honestly, at this point, I think our last hope is Trump.
Because uh these people are going to uh these people are gonna break, I think, under the pressure if we don't break their election fraud and uh in the end of this year.
So that's that's my thought on this.
Yeah, I think that politically speaking, our best hope is to take back the White House, take back Congress, and and start to finally get some policy with a political party that puts America's first.
And and really that's the new Republican Party.
Traditionally, through my life, the Republican Party has been just about as corrupt as the Democrats, maybe not as corrupt as the Democrats, but I mean the Republicans have been part of the Uniparty system, destroying this country, selling us out for decades.
There's a new Republican Party.
The old right is out.
That's why Mitch McConnell is out, that's why Kevin McCarthy is out, that's why Ron O'Romney McDaniel is out.
That's why Liz Cheney is out, that's why Adam Kinzinger is out.
So there's a new Republican Party, and and we actually care about the country, unlike the old Republican Party.
So this is our chance to save this country politically.
Yeah, one one one other additional thing I said the I think the Republicans confuse people because what they do is this is they have a good like social programs where like lower taxes, a better economy, stronger dollar, but at the same time, they're like doing World War III against every other country in the world, you know, so that we don't replace King Dollar.
And one thing I wanted to say to everyone listening is that Owen has a great thing called Owen.gold, go there because here's the thing the future is gold, silver, and bitcoin.
Gold, silver, and bitcoin, cows and chickens.
That's how we're gonna get through this in the future by being self-sufficient and having currencies that can store our energy better.
And if he's doing Owen.gold, own.gold, go there.
That is a great, great deal.
I'm gonna go there myself.
Yeah.
I like that thing also I want gold and silver, cows and chickens.
That's right.
Yeah, and Bitcoin, sir.
Absolutely.
And one last thing I wanted to make, I wanted to ask you if I can make a quick comment about Israel and the whole Palestine thing, even though that's off the subject, but it's I still have a couple things on my mind.
All right, go ahead.
Okay, yeah, I won't uh bemoan it too much.
Um one thing I wanted to say to everyone like one, like war is war.
So, like a lot of time, like growing up, I was seeing like the genocide that was happening, say to the Uyghurs in China.
I was saying how many people starving death each year.
I was seeing like the hundreds of thousands of people who were um getting killed in this Ukraine Russia war, that's a sort of like I think of a satanic sort of genocide as well.
On those people, if you look at the numbers with how many are just getting wiped out.
And um also if we look at say Hiroshima Nagasaki or Trail of Tears or even in the Crusades Day of Tears, what I'm trying to say is this is that there are wars, and war is is this.
And um also it's kind of weird that when we read scripture, it's like there's this all these forces that are getting us to combine to have this one moment where there's some sort of person that unites uh Christianity and Islam, and then we get this antichrist type, and it's just all coming into play.
And I see this Hegelian dialectic of we're gonna get on the digital system because they're wiping out the currencies, they're gonna push against Bitcoin, but really they have some sort of backdoor in the end that that that where they're gonna use Bitcoin to control us in the end.
I I don't know.
I'm I all I'm trying to say is this the whole thing between Israel and Palestine.
If you say, Oh, genocide, genocide, I kind of view as uh is a hypocrite because there are all these other things before.
And then if you're American and you're saying, oh no, no, no, they don't have the right.
The problem is is because it's a war between nations, not people, and I'm not justifying it.
I know it's bad, but honestly, China, they have plans in the books to kill everyone in North America, but also I'm kind of like a white Mexican person.
I live all through Mexico.
I I mean, I'm uh children there, I'm gonna go back there.
I don't even like living in America.
So I mean, I'm just kind of giving you my view on that.
That's it.
You know, I think you bring up good points, and you you might even bring a bit of my perspective into check there.
I I think that if I try to bring this back to us, the United States of America, I think what has been shown, and and maybe this creates a bias in the Israel Palestine situation.
But I mean, if I were to ask you, if I was to ask you who has more influence over the United States foreign policy, domestic policy, legislation, Israel or Palestine.
Well, I I'm gonna answer that.
So um the here's your own.
It's not no, no, no, no, no, no, no.
It's not, it's not a difficult question.
I'm saying who has more influence?
Israel.
All of the banks, they own the money.
So exactly.
So I so I think that what what all of this has done is it's highlighted that as an issue, and where normally, I mean, normally people like myself wouldn't talk much about it.
I I wouldn't talk much about Israel influence or Jewish influence or any of that.
It wasn't really my thing.
And people would say, Oh, you're an Israeli shield or all this stuff.
I'd say, well, no, it's just not my big issue.
It's just not right in front of me.
But now there's no doubt that it's an issue that's right in front of us.
Now, you may like it, you may not like it, but I think that there's been no doubt that that is an issue that that persists and is now clogging up the the political commentary and in this country.
I I don't think it's I don't think you can deny that.
Well, I I think I know why.
I think uh and I'm just gonna say this last thing.
I know this is very pro provocative, and I'm sorry about that, but um, here's what it is in in my perspective.
Um, I think there's a bunch of false prophets like Nick Francis, Kanye West, even this other guy, they're they're they're false prophets in the sense that they say all these things, okay, they balcanize people, get them into their groups, okay, and and each one on the side lives a very demonic, satanic life.
I mean, all you have to do is have a private dinner with Alex Jones, and I know you know him, and you just ask him about Nick Fuentes, and and he'll tell you.
And and one thing I'll say is that you know, even even to Andrew Tate in in a sense, and and it's this coming from someone who like loves Andrew Tate.
I used to email with him in 2016, 2015.
I have huge email trades with him.
We were talking about Bitcoin, this, that.
I mean, like when like he even mentioned me in one of his interviews, okay.
He didn't realize it was me, but I was just like that one dork emailing him out of Spain because I was gonna bang this one chick and her sister, and there's this whole thing, and I was like joking with him about it.
But he doesn't respond to any anymore because he's uh world famous.
But what I'm trying to say is that um I think there's a lot of false voices out there, and they're trying to bulkanize and and trick people.
Well, look, I I could completely ignore and erase all those names off the internet that you just mentioned as false prophets, and nothing would change.
The situation would still be the same.
And um, I'm not even I'm not even I I wouldn't even necessarily agree with you on any of that, but it doesn't matter.
The point is you could erase those voices off the internet, and the situation remains the same.
Thank you for the call.
Uh We're about to go back to the phone lines.
But you know what?
On that issue, you know, Candace Owens has been really engaged in this commentary.
And I think she's smart and she knows what she's doing.
But she has exposed something.
And it's it's hard to quite put a finger on it.
And that's why I just use examples.
I don't, I don't try to opinionate things.
I just look at real examples, and then I present to them, present them, and do commentary on them from an honest and neutral observant perspective.
There's no doubt to me that for whatever reason, the Israel lobby, the Jewish lobby, whatever it is, it wants control over the conservative commentary and narrative.
And it's extremely upset that they don't control the narrative in regards to Israel and Palestine.
And now it has just avalanched into something else entirely.
We're now just covering the Israeli-Palestine war and not supporting Israel wiping Palestine off the map, somehow you're an anti-Semite.
Just doing commentary that isn't from the Israeli perspective is anti Semitic.
And so really what it's doing is it's exp it's exposing a lot of people from the Jewish community.
And I think that let me play this clip of Candace Owens, and let me explain what I'm talking about here.
Because I I do everything in fairness, and I like to give analogies so that it can be better understood.
But watch what happens with this rabbi that wrote a smear hit piece lying about Candace Owens.
She then invites him onto her show, and it goes like this.
How dare you go into the misogynistic excuse me?
The anti-Semitic trope of his hat.
Now, did you see what he just did there?
He immediately reached into the bag.
He immediately reaches into the bag and says misogynistic because they're just making up excuses.
When they can't debate you intellectually, when they can't defeat you with ideas or facts, they go to insults.
And he reached into the bag to grab his insult, but he accidentally grabbed the wang one and said misogynist.
Oops.
How dare you go into the misogynistic excuse me?
The anti-Semitic trope of his hag daughter, something used throughout the late 18th and early uh through the early 20th century.
Sorry, sorry.
Hag is now anti-Semitic.
So that is a term of his have daughter that goes back into the witches of Eastern Europe.
Why did you have to call her a hag daughter?
Just to be clear, because she's a witch.
I think she's a witch.
That's not because she's Jewish.
I would call someone a hag of any color.
I think she's a witch.
What they have done over the last two years.
I believe his daughter is a hag.
I said that because that's what I believe.
You may disagree with me on that.
But to say that that's anti-Semitic is ridiculous.
I would call any person a hag.
And this Candace.
I'm gonna be very clear without trying to be insulting.
So please forgive me.
No, you already did.
You already tried.
You already were insulting.
I don't want to.
I've dealt with two years of a rabbi insulting me.
So I'm I'm I'm totally with this.
Yeah.
I have no desire to insult anybody.
It's a lie.
He's lying.
But do you understand this guy's leader with the history of the grim fairy tales and the folk tales of Eastern Europe?
I I know that we can I know that we can go back.
Now he's gonna play the victim card.
No, no, no, no, no.
No, I'm asking a specific question.
Okay.
That the witch archetype of those fairy tales were specifically modeled and called the Jews, that the Jews of that part of the world are called hags and witches specifically because they didn't eat the same food.
They had different practices and they were excluded that way as part of the bloodline.
So you are saying that we cannot issue by calling a rabbi's daughter or a witch, a daughter.
You have tapped into an anti-Semitic cult that goes back hundreds of years, whether you mean so or not.
Okay.
Now now that I've told you that, yeah, okay.
Now, folks, again, I'm fair.
Now explain to me something.
Commentary that is quite common and perfectly allowed everywhere, is talking about the victim economy and talking about black Americans wanting to take advantage of the victim economy.
Oh, we were slaves.
Oh, system systemic racism and white supremacy and all this stuff.
And we can talk about that, and we can talk about black Americans crying victim all day long.
But what about this guy?
What about Jews that cry victim all day long?
Oh, you can't talk about that.
You're anti-Semitic.
That's exactly what he does.
That's why he wears the Yarmica.
That's why he's constantly reminding you about how he's a Jew.
That's why he's constantly bringing up Jewish history and all the strife and all the troubles that they've been through for decades, but you're God's chosen people.
So God chooses when you get to be successful and when you get to suffer.
That's from your own religious text.
That's your belief.
So he goes on this oh, the Jews and the hags and the witches, and now you're conjuring up this new anti-Semitism of using the word witch.
So no, no, no.
You're not an anti-sci, you're not an anti-Semite for doing fair commentary.
You can criticize black Americans all day long for crying victim.
You can criticize black Americans all day long for using and abusing the victim economy, but not Jewish people.
Now, let me be fair.
Let's bring this all home before you have a visceral reaction.
I am a Christian conservative.
What do I and other Christian conservatives do when they see groups like the Patriot Front, we call it out.
We say, this is horrible.
This is a bad look for Christian conservatives.
This is a bad look for Trump supporters.
This is a bad look for Republicans.
I don't like this.
Why do we do that?
Because we don't like people besmirching our movement.
We don't like people besmirching our culture.
We don't like people bringing negative comment commentary and negative perspective and views towards us.
So why do I say that?
Well, because I'm not an anti-Semite.
I have plenty of Jewish people that I know that I'm friends that I get along with.
And what we need to see, rather, I should say like this.
If you're a Jewish American, you need to start condemning rabbis like this and Rabbi Shumley because they're hurting you as a good person.
Now, this is already happening in Israel.
There are already tens of thousands of people who are protesting what they view as a genocide in Palestine being committed by Netanyahu and the IDF.
So they understand Israel probably has a has the most negative approval rating.
let's just say it like this.
Israel probably has the most negative approval rating in recent history thanks to what's happening right now in the Gaza Strip.
And no matter no matter how much of censorship or propaganda or lies from the ADL and Netanyahu and everybody else, no matter how much they say, it's not helping.
And in fact, it's making it worse.
Israel would be much better off as far as public perception was concerned if they just came out and said, we are going to wipe Palestine off the map.
We believe we're God's chosen people.
We believe he's promised us this land.
So we're at war.
We're wiping them out.
Too bad for them.
Good luck.
Land is ours now.
We're taking it.
They would have a much higher public approval rating than crying victim after they stood down on October 7th and then committed the atrocities in the Gaza Strip and then still continue to cry victim and act like it's not going on.
But that's what they did.
And now anybody that gives coverage outside of supporting Israel's side is considered an anti-Semite.
So this is why Israel's public perception, approval rating, whatever, has been so negative recently.
And smart Jews in Israel and in America understand that.
And they say, hey, it's not my fault if if there even is anti-Semitism on the rise, it's not my fault.
It's Netanyahu's fault.
It's Israel's fault.
It's the Israel lobby's fault.
It's the lies.
It's the propaganda.
Same thing.
If Candace Owens comes out and criticizes the black community for crying victim all the time, or criticizes the black community for being racist against white people, or criticizes the policies of diversity, equity, and inclusion that wind up with people like Kotenji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court.
That's because Candace Owens is smart.
And she knows as a black woman that somebody like Katenji Brown Jackson getting on the Supreme Court because she's a black woman makes all people think negatively about black women when that's how they get ahead in life, simply for being a black woman.
So that's what's going on right now.
And the cries of anti-Semitism, and and we the Jews are the biggest victims on the planet, no longer works.
But they have no other play.
They have no other card to go to.
And so that's why this is going on.
That doesn't make me an anti-Semite Semite for doing fair commentary, but that's what they'll say.
And if you look into it, you find out what's really behind the TikTok ban, because the commentary on TikTok is anti-Israel about 9-1.
Probably even more.
95% of the commentary on the struggle in Israel and Palestine is against Israel and pro-Palestine.
That's why the Israel lobby and the ADL are trying to force the sale of TikTok so that a pro-Israel individual or Jewish person can own it and control that narrative.
Thank you.
That's just the fact of the matter.
Thank you.
So if I was Jewish, I would be condemning these rabbis like Rabbi Shumley or Schmulley and this rabbi that lied about Candace Owens and wrote a hit piece full of lies about Candace Owens.
Because they're making Israel look bad and they're making Jews look bad.
Just like if a black woman goes on a diatribe and says, Oh, I'm black, I get free stuff.
Give me free stuff at McDonald's.
And someone says, gee, that doesn't look good.
Same thing goes for this rabbi with that pathetic argument he makes in front of Candace Owens that saying the word hag is now anti-Semitic.
Give me a break.
And you know, I feel that.
I feel that my commentary actually weighs a lot here.
Because for years I've been called an Israeli Jewish shill.
For years, oh, info wars, Jewish shills controlled by Israel, all BS.
And the truth is, I just wasn't my big issue.
Wasn't the issue in front of me.
I talked about I don't like Israel's influence in our foreign policy, but now here we are.
And I'm going on, I don't to be honest, I don't understand this guy's commentary anymore.
He he, I mean, he used to be, I guess, what you would call an anti-Semite.
Now he's like a pro-Jew Semite?
I don't even know.
And that's um Adam Green.
Now Adam Green basically says, Oh, I was wrong about Schreuer.
Oh, I was wrong about him, and now he's begging me to come on a show.
So I'm going on his show Wednesday.
I just call it like it is, folks.
That's all I do.
I just call it like it is.
But you know, the thing about that, it seems to land you in trouble these days.
All right, let's take another call.
We got somebody on the line.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where are you from?
Yeah, this is uh Albert from Pennsylvania.
Hey, Albert, good to hear from you tonight.
You Got pants coming your way.
Hey, resend me your information so I can get that back.
I'm flooded with emails.
Oh, hey, yeah, no, that's not a problem.
That's not a problem.
And uh, I sent in the chat too.
I don't know if you saw, but whoever has the second highest donation tonight, just go ahead and, you know, and I mean, I don't want to be great.
Second highest donation.
Okay, okay.
So it would be it would be our friend Albert.
Second highest donation.
Where'd the shirt go?
Right now it's it's it's Titty Pussy.
Titty Pussy has the second high donation.
Owen Schreuer did nothing wrong.
Triblend large t-shirt.
Titty Pussy has the second largest donation tonight.
And uh if as long as no other donations come in, Titty Pussy will be the winner.
It was only five dollars, so Titty Pussy getting a good deal unless somebody outbids him.
And uh you'll get this t-shirt.
I'll even sign it for you.
Uh, but yeah, I got your pants coming your way soon.
Okay, yeah, sounds good.
Owen, thank you so much again.
And yeah, I'll send resend out that email.
But um I I think you did uh a great job uh kind of pointing some stuff out there uh just now with the whole Candace Owens thing.
And you know, it takes me uh I I read a quote.
I I think it was uh uh Vol Tar that said that um uh if you want to know who controls you, you just ask yourself who you cannot criticize.
And um I I think that ties in perfectly here to the whole Israel thing, because you know, and and personally I hate to categorize people at all this way, but it's almost like as if you want to call it like the victim Olympics, yeah, it's like Israel is now like always winning gold.
Well, they gotta remind you like it was like they could kind of just you know slink to the side and and not be involved or whatever.
But but now with what's going on between Israel and Palestine, now they have to remind everybody oh no, no, no, no, we're still the biggest victims.
We let black people be the biggest victims, but that was just us and our good graces, but now we're the biggest victims again.
Yo, yeah, totally, totally.
And um, I I just find it um very uh very concerning that so many um conservatives or whatever seem to be taking the bait with this whole TikTok ban, um, which I personally think too is being it kind of pushed by the Israel lobby.
100% because I mean, oh, absolutely.
I mean, the for somebody, if anybody claims to be um a pro um, you know, free speech, First Amendment conservative, but you sign on to the TikTok ban saying that, yeah, yeah, we got to get rid of China, then you're you're being extremely hypocritical because what you're basically endorsing is letting the government control what you can and cannot look at on your phone.
Yeah, so that's that's the larger issue.
But see, here let's just hone in on this to just prove this isn't about China.
And I've given a dozen different examples to prove this isn't really about China.
So let me just give another one.
This is maybe the most egregious example.
The COVID-19 virus was made in China.
Yet remember how the media never wanted to say China?
Remember how Congressmen and women, Republicans and Democrats, never wanted to say China.
Nobody was allowed to say China virus.
You couldn't say China, even though it came from China.
But now all of a sudden they're all willing to say China, China, China, China when it comes to the forced TikTok sale.
It's bogus.
Oh, absolutely, Owen.
It's funny, because I uh before you uh earlier this evening, I saw you post on your ex there, you know, uh basically stating that same thing, and I commented back with like the meme of like Trump saying, you know, like China, and you know, how they would get on him for constantly, you know, like just well, I mean, telling the truth.
It, you know, it came from China.
And um, no, I I just find this to be um completely out of line.
And, you know, just to kind of tie it in real quickly, you know, the difference between the new right like us that's calling this out and the old right, is that the old right was originally part of the whole establishment censorship 20 years ago when George Bush said that you know, let us not tolerate outrageous conspiracy theories when he was referring to 9-11.
And, you know, uh I I feel like, you know, that whole uh ideology, which is now shifted mainly to the left, um uh is is is uh what's all behind um the the TikTok ban and censoring uh on the internet and things like that.
100%.
But but so it's it's the immediate issue of a lobbying group deciding that they want to force a sale of an app so they can control it, and then it's the aftermath of the government seizing power to control what you have access to on your phone, and and we have to stop it right there.
We just it it cannot go on.
Thank you for the call, Albert.
Always good to hear from you.
And people say liquid bacon would be the second highest at ten dollars tonight, but I don't I haven't seen him in the chat, but it's confirmed by multiple multiple people.
We'll see if he shows up to make his claim.
Let's keep taking calls.
Next caller, what's your name?
you from cows and chickens gold and silver cows and chickens be more What's up, Rick?
Four com four comments on the clown world shirt yesterday.
People loving it, man.
People loving it.
Oh, the clown world shirt's great.
I need to I'm gonna I'm gonna eventually wear it on the show here.
In fact, droid what droid 511 is like, where's where's the the clown horn?
So we'll give it to him.
There you go.
Was uh bizarre because uh dad was visiting last week.
Friday we almost called you on Alex show, but I'm like, uh that'll be too fucking confusing.
We can't call on on Alex's show.
It'd it would have been a clusterfuck.
What's on your mind and I well, you know Supreme Supreme Court uh also blocked Texas from enforcing uh immigration laws until I believe appellate court rules uh on some matter because of some Biden admin uh filed emergency appeal.
Yeah, the Supreme Court's against having a border.
Um we'll see what ends up with this free speech case, but we at least know Kotenji Brown Jackson believes the government can see speech.
But in my but in my hypothetical, your your view has the Supreme Court hamstrings.
She's an idiot.
Well, listen, Jack, we hold these truth to be self, but you know the thing.
Yeah, Biden was struggling big time again today.
It's and over the weekend, it's just it's a bad state of affairs.
It's really bad.
9.2 billion for the illegals in uh New York City.
I I guess six, but uh Wow, yeah, I mean who would have thought though?
I mean, you even you went high.
Yeah, no.
Initially I was gonna say one point two, maybe two, and then I'm I started listening to you, and then I'm thinking, uh it's probably six, nine point two, holy shit.
Nine point two billion annually for illegal immigrants in New York.
But the subway's falling apart.
There's literally mountains of trash on the street.
So that's what you get in New York City.
It's really a sad state of affairs.
All right.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where are you from?
Donnie Culcy.
I um uh I uh I try to move fairly fast.
Um uh I think it was in the late 80s.
There was two West Point graduates, officers that come up with a efficiency rate on labor.
At the time I was interested in running I did run crews and use our model for physical labor.
But it doesn't take into attack mental labor.
I I think a lot of times I and other people get exhausted just not knowing when to quit.
It's like their studies showed that physical labor was uh uh you could do most efficient ten hour days for six days a week.
You had to stop.
And I remember working before that, twelve hours a day, seven days a week, and it fell off the cliff.
Well, all this talking and yapping and uh uh mental thought.
Uh I don't know about you, but me, it's uh I need to know.
But and maybe your crew can find that.
Um, or Jones's.
But anyway, uh well, I got news about how now multiple cities, I'm gonna cover it tomorrow, are are pushing for this universal basic income stuff.
So, you know, you can't even work at all because it's just too hard.
Yeah, that's just that's just uh slavery.
You know, they get us roped into this crap.
This uh uh nothing the currency deal that's coming up.
It's like you got to tell them no.
I've already been talking to men for uh several years.
I remember, you know, in the 70s, uh hearing about uh Ron or uh yeah, Dr. Ron Paul, a congressman, uh John Burke Society, and hey, it's uh it's here, baby.
You know, and you're seeing it in those medals.
I mean, I'm not doing bad on some of this stuff, not great.
I should have sunk a little more into it, but uh, you know, uh let's say, hey, that uh I've I mentioned once before, you know, somebody told me I was a mean motherfricker ass whipper.
Well, I tell you what, that Robert Barnes, the lawyer, that's my modern day of a mean uh mother uh ever whipper.
Uh that guy's a great lawyer.
He's probably the the best, and it's like, you know, I'm I'm more prepared than I was.
I've been through a few cases uh on the real estate business mainly, but uh uh like winning, you know, and I like winning.
Uh but anyway, Barnes is uh excellent on that stuff, and and that Norm Pattis is all right.
I like him.
But uh it's like uh well I'm gonna have uh I'm gonna have an update with my attorney Norm Pattis this week on our movement to the Supreme Court, and I mean it's honestly just crazy.
It's uh it's it's just stunning how much uh just what they do to you throughout this process, and and the entire purpose is to turn you off so that you don't take it to the Supreme Court so that you don't fight the government when they do you wrong.
It's it's why they make it so difficult and so expensive and make all these hoops that you gotta jump through and with no guarantees for anything, unfortunately.
So I'm gonna have an update with my attorney Norm Pattis sometime this week.
Um I'm not sure what the day is gonna be on the war room, but we will have an update on that.
And I mean it's just it's just nonstop with the legal stuff, whether it's me or Alex.
It's just it's honestly just nonstop.
And uh that's another part of it.
It's just legal warfare to keep you bogged down so that you can't uh just do what you need to do to tell the truth and activate fellow patriots to try to save this country.
So I mean, you see how they did Alex.
All right, next caller.
What's your name?
Where you from?
Okay, there you go.
Yes, hello.
All right, we'll try another one.
Next caller, where you're from.
Dennis from Kentucky, bro.
Hey, what's up, Dennis?
We figured out the numbers.
We have the numbers for every uh uh California, Chicago, and New York.
We see the redistricting pattern.
We see the allocation of money.
And we know that they're going for the electoral electoral college seat and congressional seats.
Yeah, that's what they do.
They redistrict, they redistrict so that all the congressional seats are blue, and then they rig the electoral college count with illegal immigrants to ensure that California, Illinois, and New York is like a uh a three-piece suit to electoral victory.
So Tyson and Amazon have been given illegal aliens that have that's right, social security cards.
Well, they said they want to give them jobs.
No, they we got footage of it.
We have footage of it.
We have uh uh uh North African woman that showed us her home.
So it's uh, you know, still on the um card.
Not even torn away.
Sure do.
Yes, we do.
This is for real people.
This is not a game.
We know again.
And I want you to understand something that um 98% of the Aboriginal vote has pulled away.
There will be you will go you're going to watch a segregation of identity theft of the African American.
Guarantee.
Well, most most black Americans already understand how they've been lied to by the Democrats when they were promised free stuff, and then they gave it to the illegals.
And I don't know how that will result in an election, but uh we're seeing it at least on the streets.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where you from 5'11.
Yeah, what?
What's your name?
Where are you from?
Say a thank you for uh dude calling me out with the clownhorn.
Oh right.
So yeah, you need to have the in-house clownhorn.
This clown horn.
Yeah, there you go.
No, uh so deep dots.
So there was a uh thing that Biden clouded with uh hydrogen stuff, and I'm in the industry, and I'm uh there was 80 billion dollars that were contributed to uh the hydrogen industry,
and uh coming from that industry, I've seen zero dollars, zero production of any uh no results.
Well, they've just that we just came out with the numbers that the Biden administration gave nine billion dollars, or was it eight billion or nine billion?
We covered it on the Alex Jones show.
I was filling in for Alex last Friday.
The Biden administration gave eight or nine billion dollars for electric vehicle charging stations, and they only built ten.
Uh uh my numbers are a little mixed up, but it was like 600 million per electric charging station.
So they just steal this money, they just steal this money.
That's all they do, they just steal it.
All right, I think maybe it's time to uh put an end to the calls for tonight, and we're about to sign off, but I wanted to give you guys a little anecdote.
You guys know I'm a big music fan, a big rock fan, and and you know, I called Creed's re-emergence in 2024 before anybody.
You all know it.
You all know it.
I said Creed 24 before anybody.
Now they're on tour, now they're booking all these shows, all these gigs, all these promotions, all these interviews, they are getting played on Paramount commercials.
I saw Creed in the future.
But did I overlook somebody else?
Was somebody else disrespected?
Is there something we've all been missing?
We've all been lied to about?
How could this be?
I might have to reinvestigate.
Vinny Lacosto, though, will break it down for me.
Whoever convinced the world that Nickelback sucked, bravo.
So...
Bravo!
Because what you did, it's possibly the greatest psy-op in the history of mankind.
Your meme, it made an entire generation lie.
Lie to the world, to themselves, to the world.
Whenever they heard, never made it as a wise man, couldn't make it as a bowman.
We'd hear those certified slobber knocker bars.
Slobber knocker.
And we'd say they sucked.
We didn't believe that.
None of us did.
And we knew it.
We knew it.
I fell for it.
Of course.
I'd get in my mom's van, turn on the radio.
You're listening to WKXY.
Up next, Hero by Nickelback.
I'd roll my eyes.
Nickelback sucks.
They say that a hero who can save us.
I'm not gonna stand in the way AHHHHH!
*laughs*
He's cooking.
He's cooking, let him cook.
A tear.
Would roll down my cheek.
I'd look out the window of my mom's 2004 Honda Odyssey.
I'd watch that little dude run through obstacles that I made up that were so fucking sick.
And I'd say to myself.
This shit rolls.
So to whoever you are.
Kudos.
For making everyone embarrassed.
For loving something.
And not even understanding why.
You must be punished.
Limp biscuits been back, JC.
Justice must be served.
Because for fourteen years, nickelback.
A rock and roll bed that deserved our praise for making delicious jams.
Delicious.
They were clowned.
A fat dookie was taken on their musical genius.
Because of a meme.
That's right, realtor Dan Grimes.
A meme that you made.
Who did this?
So I will find you.
Oh I will capture you.
And I'll make you accountable.
I built a bunker on a remote island.
It's untraceable.
Nobody's gonna find it.
And in that bunker.
I designed a room.
Alright, he's the now he's getting for you.
Too spicy now.
He's cooking with something else now.
It has a certain theme.
Nickelback.
The wallpapers.
Nickelback.
The rug.
Nickelback.
The bed sheets, the lampshades.
It's all nickelback.
I'm gonna feed you.
Don't worry.
I hope you like Spider-Man Pop Tarts.
I've got plenty.
We gotta keep those pearly whites strong.
Enjoy your nickelback tooth tuned toothbrush.
I've got hundreds.
Oh my gosh.
And I know what you're thinking.
What am I gonna do in a bunker?
I'm gonna go crazy.
I'm gonna lose my mind.
I've incorporated recreation.
But he has nickelback.
I'm not a monster.
Well, there's a radio.
It only plays nickelback songs, but they've released a hundred and thirty six songs.
You'll have plenty.
I put in a computer.
But you know Napster?
I gotta keep security tight.
Lime wire.
I can't have you just trying to escape, you know?
So naturally, you'll only have access to nickelback.com.
You understand.
A 72-inch TV.
LED.
Mounted in the wall.
Nickelback concerts.
It's got 38 channels.
All nickelback.
Each one looping.
A different Nickelback music video.
A different Nickelback music video.
The next 14 years of your life.
Gonna be magical.
And we all just wanna be big rocks, not a living in gonna batom 50 in cars.
Oh my god.
I never thought that this would come up.
I'm gonna have to reinvestigate, guys.
I'm gonna have to reinvestigate this entire issue now.
Because we successfully brought back Creed.
And rightfully so.
By the way, Lint Biscuit never left.
Just came out with an album a couple years ago.
Still on tour.
But I I might have to re-investigate nickelback now.
We might have to do a cold call investigation into this right now.
It might have to happen.
Cause I'll be honest, I mean, I know some of the nickelback hits.
I always knew about the anti-nickelback propaganda.
I never really necessarily bought into it, but because of that, I never dove in headlong.
I don't know much nickelback deep cut.
Maybe Saturday night.
I liked that, but I been denied?
Have we been denied?
We might have to do.
We might have to do a little cold research into this.
We might have to do it together right now, guys.
And if this hits, I'm just I just pulled up a random nickelback song from the album Dark Horse called Something in Your Mouth.
I've never heard this before.
It's not about Cushy.
I've never heard this before.
And so we're gonna, if this hits, if this slaps, this could be a sign, ladies and gentlemen.
This we're gonna take it all the way.
And yes, we will need the dri- we we will need the dancing memes.
I don't think we we don't go there yet.
Let's just wait.
Because if this doesn't hit, we're gonna have to immediately retract and then play something that I know will hit.
But here we go.
Is nickel back did we?
Oh my god to meet the honey with the million dollar body.
They say it's over budget, but you should pay her just a touch and come out!
Fucking nickelback!
Fucking nickelback!
Are you kidding me?
You used to hit the big screen and shoot a little up scene Of Hollywood and college sheep You got me for your Holocaust Come on!
It hits!
Yes!
Yes!
Alright, we go, we go!
We take it out!
New drop coming to Owen Troyer.store next week.
You're repent!
In the meantime!
You shake your ass on everyone!
Fucking nickelback!
Let's hear the dancing meat!
Let's go!
Peace and love!
Pull it out!
'Cause you look so much cuter With something in your mouth Crafty little tricks, tattoos on her left If she's bending as you're spending There's no way to do it, so baby, come on!
Let's come like a princess bed and add a skin smells better than the scent of every flower in the desert.
I'm out.
Pretty little lady with the pretty pink tone.
Every shaky daddy hitting on her own that loan.
Doesn't care about the money.
She could be with anybody, anybody, I'm a honey, one of you all alone.
Oh, you're not a thing.
You're ripping up the dance floor, honey.
Letting woman You shake your ass around for everyone.
I love the way you dance with everybody.
Empty some mouth by sucking on your thumb.
You're so much cooler when you never pull it out.
cause you look so much cuter with something in your mouth She loves the night scene, bar queen, just living for the fun Taking over every dance floor like she's the only one In the spotlight, old man, kissing everyone And try to look so innocent while sucking on her phone.
So much cooler When you never pull it out So much cooler With something in your mouth You're not a thing You're ripping up the dance floor I get any more love.