All Episodes
Previous Next
Jan. 30, 2024 - Owen Shroyer Live
01:57:15
OSL 50 - The Risks/Benefits Of Transhumanism And A.I.
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You like some of that?
You think a robot can do that?
God John Wing That's human magic right there.
Boobie 18, Swiss metal band.
In the worst heroes, I can't do the Swiftman.
I'm the way a no one has to lose the time.
Lotus over.
You know, speaking of music, I heard Taylor Swift has a tight end, just a rumor.
Just a rumor.
Well, I got to tell you, I'm somebody that lives and breathes politics, but sometimes you just get burnt out.
Sometimes you just get burnt out on the politics.
AIM 316 and the Rumble Rants.
Fellow headbanger here.
More into classical metal.
What do you consider classical metal?
What, like Metallica types, like 90s?
What do you consider classical or classic metal?
Big headbangers, big headbanger energy in the comments.
Iron Maiden, Vengeance Rising.
What's up, Brett B61?
By the way, we've got good news.
It appears that Rumble Anthrax, that's a classic.
Judas Priest, Black Sabbath.
It appears that Rumble and StreamYard have finally teamed up so that now you don't have to enter the custom information every time into the stream.
And in my comments, I can follow the comments on Twitter and Rumble in the same box.
So we got that going for us.
Pantera, Venom, Quiet Riot, Motorhead, Scorpions, Celtic Frost, Kiss, Slayer.
Is Kiss considered metal really?
Shine down?
That's not really classic.
I don't know.
Would you say would you consider KISS?
Yeah, Glamrock.
KISS is more of like the birth of Glamrock.
There's some good Glam Rock out there, though.
Maybe we'll play some Glam Rock before it's all said and done.
But anyway, ladies and gentlemen.
Lamb of God.
How do you even do?
Lamb of God.
Limp Bizkit.
That's like new metal.
Rush is not metal.
Def Leopard, yeah, I don't know.
Ted Nugent, more rock and roll.
So thank you because, yeah, I get political overload, and quite frankly, I just kind of get sick of it every once in a while.
And I just get the burnout.
Disturbed is better than Lamb of God.
I would probably agree.
I would probably agree.
I thought about just coming on here and just doing straight up music and finally releasing my top 10 rock albums from the 2010s from that decade.
I do have it completed.
I just haven't released it yet.
Talk about the rigged NFL.
Man, don't even get me started.
Don't even get me started.
You know, you gotta sometimes you just gotta back off the people on Twitter because it just, it is what it is.
It is what it is.
And there's really just nothing you can do about it.
So you just let them go.
You just gotta let them go.
But, you know, I did, I did want to talk about something serious.
And that is the emergence of artificial intelligence and humans merging with machine.
And, you know, it's funny.
It's funny.
I didn't know this until tonight.
But Elon Musk and I share a birthday.
Elon Musk and I share a birthday.
So myself, Elon Musk, James O'Keefe, John Elway.
Pretty strong day.
We all celebrate the same birthday.
Maybe the most epic day ever.
Might be the greatest day in the 365-day calendar is June 28th.
Elon Musk, James O'Keefe, Owen Schroyer, John Elway, and many more.
And many more to come.
And everybody knows June is the best month anyway.
But anyway, to get serious, the risks and benefits of transhumanism and artificial intelligence.
And so, why would I be talking about this?
Because the big news is Elon Musk says Neuralink has implanted first brain chip in a human.
Billionaire startup will study functionality of human-machine interface, which it says lets loose with paralysis control devices with their thoughts.
The first human received an implant from the brain chip startup on Sunday and is recovering well, said Elon Musk.
But the FDA, I'm sure, is going to try to stop Musk from advancing in this field.
They'd much rather have the institutions and corporations that are controlled by the Democrats or the leftist globalist agenda like Google, Microsoft, and Apple.
Elon Musk startup Neuralink implants chip into brain, a first human test subject.
Elon Musk announced that his human tech startup, Neuralink, has inserted a chip implant into the brain of its first human test subject.
The billionaire said the person had the chip surgically implanted into their brain on Sunday and is recovering well.
Recovering well.
Initial results show promising neuron spike detection, Musk tweeted.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration last year greenlit human trials of the company's brain chips after Neuralink performed hundreds of tests on pigs, sheeps, and monkeys and was called out for animal abuse by animal rights groups in the process.
I have to tell you that testing on animals is something I do not like, actually.
Now, I understand the need for it.
I understand certainly why it happens, but it is a very dangerous practice that I do believe the satanic cultists use to test future subjects to see if they'll be willing to engage in mass human sacrifice, amongst other things.
And in fact, one legendary talk show host who's now in the Radio Hall of Fame, Michael Savage, talked about this.
And in fact, he was brought into that and rejected it and then was not allowed to advance any further in his field of medicine at that time.
He didn't want to test on animals.
He didn't like what he saw in the testing facilities.
And they said, well, if you don't do this, you know your career is over.
And he said, consider my career over.
Of course, that was only the beginning of his Hall of Fame radio career, a major influence on my broadcasting.
But it does scare me.
I think that's one of the darkest things to do is to hurt animals.
And this isn't to say I'm against hunting or anything like that.
I'm not like that.
I'm not a member of PETA.
But there's something different about trapping animals and using them for testing.
So I think it's a very slippery slope.
Let's put it that way.
Not to say this means Elon Musk is inherently evil.
Just to say I believe the satanic cults use this as kind of a testing ground to see if you are willing to harm animals and then you get moved up into humans.
The last two years have been all about focus on building a human-ready product.
Neuralink co-founder DJ So told Bloomberg News in November, it's time to help an actual human being.
The brain chip, which has 1,000 electrodes, is meant to allow people to wirelessly perform computer functions by just thinking of what they'd like to do via a think-and-click mechanism.
Last month, the company said it was looking for quadriplegics under 40 years old to participate in the human trials.
It also said a surgeon would remove part of the test patient's skull before a seven-foot-tall robot named R1 would take over the implant 64 threads lined with electrodes into their brain.
And so here's some of the stuff, some of the images.
The electrodes are programmed to gather data about the brain, including neural activity attached to the movement intention.
Oh, get out of here.
Get out of here.
These neuro signals recorded by the electrodes would then be sent back to Neuralink computers for decoding.
The short-term goal of the company is to build a generalized brain interface and restore autonomy to those with debilitating neurological conditions and unmet medical needs.
So, who also holds the title of vice president for engineering, told Bloomberg.
Then, really, the long-term goal is to have this available for billions of people and unlock human potential and go beyond our biological capabilities.
The long-term goal is to have this available for billions of people and unlock human potential and go beyond our biological capabilities.
Now, that is a scary notion, a scary precedent for obvious reasons.
And I think this is where the very heavy debate comes into play.
Now, take this at the lowest value, and that's just to say.
That's just to say that, okay, well, your biological capabilities say if you have a depleting injury that makes you paralyzed, you're paralyzed.
You can no longer walk.
But with a brain chip, there might be future technology to allow you the freedom of movement again.
Now, you take this to the largest scale, and you're thinking, what?
Superhuman capabilities, instant interactions with machines and databases and the internet with zero latency at all.
It's unclear how many human participants will be part of the technology trial, which will assess the safety of both the robot surgeon and the chip itself, as well as its functionality.
The trial will take about six years to complete.
Now, I don't know about this robot surgeon.
I don't know if that's also Neuralink technology or some other technology.
Robot surgeons.
Now, this is a whole nother realm of debate.
Would you want a robot surgeon?
Now, you would probably say at this stage, you would prefer a human surgeon to a robot.
I would certainly say that.
I think most people would probably say that.
My guess is within a few decades, people will probably rather have the robot.
And computing and everything is getting so serious and precise now, it might actually be safer and more effective for a robot in time.
But all comedy aside, considering the diversity hires that we currently have in the medical industry, yeah, you might prefer the robot.
You might prefer the robot instead of some libtard that gets hired for their skin color or for their mangled genitals or whatever else there are.
Some people in the medical industry are commenting saying robots are already in the operating room.
To what degree, to those in the medical community in the chat, to what degree are robots utilized?
Like, how important is a robot in some of these surgeries?
Yeah, I don't think it would be a situation where you're in the middle of the surgery and the robot has to update.
But that's funny because we were just in the middle of a live stream and my robot tried to update.
Did you see that one?
What do the robots do?
See, they're saying that the robots are already vital.
Thank God, I don't spend any time in a hospital.
They perform on heart valves, on neurosurgeries.
So robots already have a massive role in our civilization.
People are saying surgeries.
A lot of individuals here.
I guess we had a lot of people in the medical industry listening in tonight.
AI already involved in the healthcare system.
I say I'm a pragmatic individual.
And so I say whatever makes the process with the highest level of success and the easement of difficulty, then I'm for it.
I guess another question would be, should you be allowed an option?
Should you be allowed an option if you go in there for a robot to perform surgery or a human?
We're not really at that stage yet.
There's always going to be humans in the process at this point in time.
We'll get some of the videos of Musk promoting Neuralink.
We'll get some of those videos and some of the other videos where they put a hole in these guys' heads and then plug in these huge wire structures.
Now, see, I look at this like I would imagine most people reactively and instinctually, and I just say, I don't want any wires or brain chips in my head.
Period.
Now, having said that, let's say I get in an accident or something, and I'm paralyzed, or I lose feeling or something in my limbs, and the only option for me to regain it is for some sort of chip.
I think the brain chips that they have now are for like seizures and stuff.
If I'm not mistaken, there are some brain chips for people that have seizures.
Yeah, they'll call you a robophobe or a chipophobe if you don't want it.
The new leftist phobias, everybody's a phobe now.
But if you were in that situation, if you were, or let's say you went blind and there was a brain chip that could allow you vision, I think it would be hard not to accept that technological advancement.
I think it would be a different decision for you in that position to say, yes, I would like this brain chip or this human-machine interface so I can walk again or see again.
Let's see what Wired Magazine is reporting.
Elon Musk says a human patient has received Neuralink's brain implant.
Details are scarce, but Neuralink co-founder Elon Musk says initial results are promising.
Now, here's another argument with all of this.
This technology is inevitable.
There's no way with the advancements and the way technology is moving that this is not going to happen.
Whether it's Elon Musk or Google or anybody else, this technology is inevitable.
So now you get into the issue of like, okay, well, you're choosing a cell phone company.
Do you trust this brand of cell companies or do you trust this brand of cell phone manufacturers versus the other brand?
And if you trust Elon Musk, he's against the move to eradicate the earth of human beings.
And he's not a eugenicist like so many other individuals that might be in his position of wealth and power and influence.
So you might say, well, okay, all these brain chip options, all these human-machine interface options, I trust Elon Musk the most.
He might not put a back door in it.
He might not allow the global corporate government a back door to use it to program me, enslave me, or whatever.
Turn it off, turn it on, use it for some other nefarious agenda.
They can't starve you, says, if I could get a brain chip to overcome my nearly 30-year struggle with binge eating, I would be on the operating table tomorrow.
Well, I know that's a struggle for some people, but the truth is, my friend, it's all up to you.
It's all up to you.
Apple Vision Pro, I'm going to make a prediction about Apple Vision Pro.
It's going to fail miserably.
It's going to fail miserably.
All those, all those goggle-wearing Facebook's meta, all this digital reality crap has failed miserably.
Have you noticed that?
It's all failed miserably.
It was kind of like when video game companies started experimenting with, and we're talking about your big names, your Nintendos, your Microsofts, your Sony's.
And they started experimenting with kind of live-action video games and controllers that you had to move to play and all this other stuff.
And then there were some platforms and consoles that were, that was it.
Well, those really failed.
And they definitely have kind of intertwined it in some of the new games, like with Nintendo Switch.
So there's still some features and some games where you can use the motion technology, but it's pretty much been shelved and nobody really uses that.
They kind of backed off that.
I mean, the Nintendo Wii might have been the most mainstream version of it, but Xbox had one, PlayStation had one, and it just, it came and it went.
It came and it went.
It didn't became a mainstay.
It didn't become a staple.
And I think it's the same with this video interface.
People would still rather look at the screen, or if they're going to do some kind of alternative digital reality, they still prefer just a transactional thing, not one where they feel like they're connected to it or in it.
And so there's all kinds of different examples.
I would bet you that most people would probably rather play The Sims, even the oldest version of The Sims, one of the all-time great games, than some new version where you have to wear a headset or some sort of augmented reality and you're supposed to actually feel like you're there.
I think I would say even 90% of the people would rather be playing The Sims or some sort of transactional relationship with the human and the game as opposed to the augmented reality with goggles over your eyes or this new Apple Eye vision and all this other stuff.
Drew Hernandez in the chats.
I think Drew goes live after me, by the way.
Check out his channel on Rumble.
Or he might be down at the board of reporting tonight.
So I don't know if he's live tonight.
Drew, what's up?
He says, Stephen Hawking would have loved a brain ship for obvious reasons.
Uh-oh.
Don't go down the Steven.
Don't go down the Stephen Hawking rabbit hole.
I'm not a hater of Stephen Hawking.
I remember reading a Stephen Hawking book when I was young.
I probably still have it somewhere around here.
It was called the Oh man.
I forget what it was called.
It was something about physics.
And it was, it was a very interesting read.
It was probably way too smart for me, but it was definitely an interesting read.
I went right through it.
I couldn't put it down.
And now it's bothering me.
I may go have to find it.
But okay, Stephen Hawking.
You know, now I'm going to get conspiratorial.
I'm not one that believes in the Stephen Hawking conspiracies.
But if you are as cynical and distrusting as the establishment that I am, wouldn't they love to take some dude who can't walk, can't talk, and basically has to communicate through a machine and then claim he's the smartest guy on earth and then use that so-called smartest guy on earth to promote all of their fake science and fake agendas.
Just getting conspiratorial.
That's it.
That's it.
Not even saying I believe it.
Not even saying I believe it.
Joanne E. V says that myself and Drew Hernandez are her two favorite shows.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Thank you, Joanne.
Yes, yes.
Yes, yes.
The conspiracy theory that essentially Stephen Hawking was totally fake.
Not saying, I'm not selling that here.
I'm just saying it's out there.
That's all.
Oh boy, now they're going to Einstein was fake.
No, I don't think so.
I think Einstein was legit.
Helen Keller was a phony.
Here we go.
Neil deGrasse Tyson.
Yeah, yeah.
Yeah, there's some interesting ones there.
Would Christopher Reeves have taken a brain chip to walk again?
What about Michael Fox?
If he could take a brain chip to stop his neurological problems, getting back to the issue at hand, though, with Elon Musk and his brain chip, and we'll play some videos of this as well.
So first human patient, they're saying it's a success.
Yes, Graham Hancock is awesome.
He's disproven the theory of human evolution.
It's totally disproven.
It's a complete lie.
After years of delays, Neuralink started recruiting patients for a clinical trial in the fall.
After receiving approval from the FDA and Hospital Ethics Board, the company is developing a device called a brain-computer interface.
Musk has said that Neuralink's ultimate goal is to achieve a symbiosis with artificial intelligence.
Yikes.
A little scary.
But for now, he's starting with a far more modest aim, allowing paralyzed people to control a sensor or keyboard with their brains.
In a brochure about the study, Neuralink says it is recruiting participants with quadriplegia or paralysis in all four limbs due to a cervical spinal cord injury or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, ALS, and that are at least 22 years old.
It anticipates the study will take six years to complete.
Pretty long-term study.
I'm guessing, I don't know if it'll be Neuralink.
Somebody will come out with this and go public before six years.
I'm not saying it's going to hit the market for public consumption, but somebody, somebody will go public with man-machine brain-controlled interface within six years.
And they'll do a public display and they'll do a public showing.
I do believe that.
In its brochure, the company says it will use a surgical robot it developed.
So it was developed.
So it is a robot from Neuralink, then I suppose.
Seven-foot robot that does this on you.
Puts the chip in your head.
I guess it puts the hole in your head and the chip in your head.
To place the implant into a region of the brain that controls movement and tension.
Once in place, the coin-sized device is designed to record and transmit brain signals wirelessly to an app that decodes those signals.
So this is where it gets a little sketchy to me.
And so this is when, again, it comes into a trust issue.
Now, this has to be the most invasive product potential ever for human consumption.
I mean, there are things for your heart.
There are other chips out there.
But now we're talking about something that is able to essentially communicate with Wi-Fi and the internet.
And they might say it's a one-way transmission.
But now you're talking about the potential of two-way transmission.
And who's to say somebody can't hack into that device?
And then they're controlling your thoughts and they're controlling your motions.
This is where it gets a little sketchy.
This is where it gets a little sketchy.
In his post today, Musk added that the patient was recovering well and that initial results, so promising neuron spike detection, but it could be months before we know whether the patient can successfully use the implant to control a computer or other device.
The person will have to recover from surgery and training someone to use a BCI can take several weeks.
Did they say what a BCI is?
A brain-controlled intention?
Is that what that is?
They weren't clear on that.
I guess that's a brain-controlled intention.
The Neuralink patient is far from the first to get a BCI brain chip interface.
Is it a brain chip interface?
A few dozen people around the world have been outfitted with the devices as part of research studies.
The first, Matt Nagel, did so in 2004.
Over the years, these systems have allowed paralyzed people to play video games, move robotic arms, and make or write emails using just their thoughts.
Until recently, BCIs were largely pursued by academic labs.
They required clunky setups using thick cables that made them practical to use at home.
Neuralink's system is designed to be wireless and records neural activity through more than 1,000 electrodes distributed across 64 threads, each thinner than a human hair.
The most common device used in BCI research, the Utah Array, records from 100 electrodes, so 10 times the interface.
The company has also been beset by controversy.
Here it is, particularly around its treatment of research animals.
What about when Fauci researches on animals?
When Anthony Fauci researches on animals and tortures them and kills them, though, no controversy, though.
A wired investigation in September detailed how some of its monkeys died as a result of the company's brain implant testing.
I guess they're beyond that now, testing on humans, though.
The company is reportedly facing a federal investigation related to its treatment of animal subjects.
Ha, no, no.
They couldn't.
Well, I wouldn't say they couldn't care less about the animal treatment, but as long as you play games with the government, as long as you do what the corporate world government wants you to do, you can torture and test on animals as much as you like.
But Musk is not a good little slave of the corporate world government.
So they use this over his head as like an anvil over his head that, oh, you better do what we want or we're going to bring your business down, just like what they're trying to do with X or formerly Twitter right now.
So that's all that is.
That's just the corrupt federal government trying to control him.
And when this all goes to market and he's competitive in the market, that's when they'll drop the anvil if he doesn't play nice with the corporate establishment.
A Reuters report revealed that Neuralink was fined for violating U.S. Department of Transportation rules regarding the movement of hazardous materials.
Oh, but when they take the hazardous materials from the chemical spill in East Palestine, Ohio, and they spill it all over the highway, nobody says anything.
Since Neuralink's founding in 2016, a handful of companies have emerged to commercialize these systems.
One competitor, New York-based Synchron, has not only beat Neuralink to implanting its BCI in people, but has shown that its device is safe and allows patients with paralysis to browse the web and do online shopping and banking while at home.
Neuralink has not specified where the trial is taking place or how many patients will be included.
The company has set up a patient registry for potential participants to learn whether they qualify for the study.
It is not registered with clinictrials.gov.
Good.
A central database with information on clinical studies funded or sponsored by industry and government agencies.
So he's not working with the government on this.
That makes me like it a little bit more.
Right now, the only details available on the Neuralink surgery come from a single Musk tweet.
While it may not move the needle on merging humans with AI, it would represent a critical milestone for a promising device.
Well, let's go to some of these videos.
Some a little more goofy than others dealing with the weirdness of humans merging with machines.
But before we do that, let's look at the obvious benefits and dangers.
The benefits we have gone over and have been covered a lot in some of the stories that we read.
But the dangers Are where we start to get into existential crisis here.
Now, let me be, let's get something out of the way before we go down this road.
Whether you like it or not, or whether I like it or not, this stuff is inevitable.
This technology is inevitable.
And technology is not inherently evil.
It's just like a hammer.
A hammer can be used to build, or a hammer can be used to destroy.
The hammer itself is not good or evil.
It's technology.
So technology can be used for good or evil in this instance as well.
And rather, the evil that this could potentially be used for is much more dangerous than, say, the potential evil that a hammer could be used for.
It is still inherently neutral, but this technology is inevitable.
And I think the best parallel to use, and I think the best maybe example to look at at this point in time is cell phones.
Cell phones have an obvious benefit.
If they didn't, we wouldn't use them and we wouldn't carry them around virtually all the time.
And yet, I'm somebody that looks at what cell phones have done to our civilization, and I look at the good and I look at the bad.
And the example I like to use for where we're at as a civilization pre and post cell phone is public events.
Now, I'm somebody that likes to go to concerts and to ball games.
Now, I remember in the 90s, and thanks to the internet, I mean, the internet is another good example, but thanks to the internet, you can go back and I can go back and watch some of my favorite ball games that I ever went to.
You know, Mark McGuire hitting his 60-second home run at Bush Stadium or the St. Louis Rams going on a run to the Super Bowl in 1999 or, you know, other games from the early 2000s, from the 1990s when I was younger.
You can go back and look at like Woodstock 99 and Woodstock 98 and all these other concerts from back in the day.
And I have enough of a memory of those times compared to where we're at now.
And I think it is, I mean, to me, it's not even debatable.
Going to events like that, concerts and ball games prior to cell phones, and that's just two examples.
I mean, you can name anything.
It was a much better experience.
It was a much more human experience.
And we all shared the same experience and we were all focused on the same things.
And it brought us together in a much better way because we were all part of the same experience.
Not everybody was in their phone.
Not everybody had their own agenda on their phone.
Plus, just from an overall standpoint, you didn't have all the screens and the flashing lights and the advertisements and everything else.
It was all about what was going on on the field or what was going on on the stage.
And there was no distraction from that.
And everybody was sharing in that experience.
But now with smartphones and smart screens and everything, it takes away from that experience.
And yet, there's virtually nowhere you can go to avoid that.
But yet, it is what it is.
It's not going backwards.
And that technology is here to stay.
Now, there might be a marketing gimmick here or there that takes away from that.
I know there are certain comedians and bands and artists that will make you turn your phone in before you go in.
I've seen that before.
Venues might even pop up to say we're getting rid of all that or we're not allowing phones or we're not going to have all the screens.
We're going to have it like an old school experience, kind of like Wrigley Field used to cling to that experience, maybe even Fenway Park to an extent, but now they've got the screens everywhere.
They're the same way.
So even though we could all sit here and argue, was life better before cell phones?
And yet here we are today, we've all got cell phones, and it would be hard to live your life without them, at least in the way that we're used to now.
So I think that this technology and the brain chips and the interfacing between humans and machines is going to be very much the same.
Much more intense, much more existential.
But I think it'll be very much the same.
The people that were around before this are going to say, wasn't that a better time?
Don't you remember being human?
But then it's going to reach such a paramount that everybody is going to be merged with machines.
I mean, aside from this just attached right to your head, most people are already attached to it anyway.
So this technology is inevitable.
It's not going anywhere.
Nothing is going to stop it.
No matter how much you don't want it to be here, no matter how much you might hate it, no matter how much of an existential threat you think it is, no matter how evil you think it is, it's all coming.
And you have to understand, even though I know that there are Christians listening to this and others that believe in the mark of the beast and talk about the biblical nature of all of this, you have to understand that not everybody shares your beliefs.
And most likely the people developing this technology don't share your beliefs.
So that's not really going to impact this either.
Now, it might impact your decision making as to whether you're going to engage with this or promote this or become a consumer of this yourself.
But say that it's just biblical prophecy, maybe, but the point is, warning people on that is not going to stop it either.
Now, again, where this takes civilization existentially, I think is pretty obvious.
Virtually, you're going to become a walking-talking smartphone, a walking-talking cell phone.
And you'll have all the technology embedded into you.
You'll have enhanced vision.
You'll have the ability to take photos.
You'll have like some removable data card.
You'll be able to record to film.
There's some black mirror episodes that are about this.
You'll be able to enhance hearing, turn down hearing.
Who knows?
Maybe change your hair color, change your eye color, all kinds of stuff like that.
So it'll be the customizable human.
It won't be like a surrogate like the movie.
You'll just become a customizable, interfaced biological android.
Now, I don't quite think we can comprehend.
I don't quite think we can comprehend what this does as far as what human biology means.
I mean, maybe it's like the Blade Runner film where, oh, well, if you do this or you do that, you can't reproduce, but then you can.
Well, how do you reproduce something that's not biological?
What will all of this technology do to the biological process of reproduction?
I don't know if we can properly address that.
I don't know if we can properly cross that bridge yet.
But it could reach a point where, And I guess this is what is in the brave new world, brave new world revisited, where you can't biologically have a child anymore.
And it basically has to be made in a lab.
But I still think that's kind of too far off, too far in the distance for us to really get a proper vision of.
And yet, I do think that prospect can at least be perceived in the time being.
But getting back to this issue at hand.
Now, as we're talking about merging with machines, we already have people that put chips into themselves.
And they talk about, oh, it's so great.
I can tell you, I would never want to do this.
But here's an example: a dude puts a chip in himself, and look at how convenient it is.
And this is the future because of us.
Oh, it's so convenient.
Gave you the idea that you want it to really be a walking computer.
So I've always been a tech enthusiast, and I always try to be on the cutting edge of technology.
So that drove Brandon DeLawley to do what some might believe only takes place in a science fiction movie.
It gets inserted into your skin.
A chip, and not the type you eat, but a microchip has been implanted in Brandon's left hand.
This one is just a little guy right there.
Yeah, I see that right there.
Yeah, definitely.
So after that was inserted and the swelling went down, I'm able to open up the front and back door to my house.
I can walk up to people and have them tap their phone to my hand and instantly transfer my contact information, my portfolio, my COVID vax card.
But Brandon is thinking, why stop there?
He's got two hands, right?
And plenty of room for more chips.
So I thought, how cool would it be if I could leave my house, no car key, no house key?
So two weeks ago, right here in Michigan, Brandon got another chip and planted this one in his right hand to unlock and start his Tesla.
It's a perfect backup, something you can never forget, something that doesn't break, something that won't fail you.
And if you think having chips implanted in your body requires a doctor or is costly, well, think again.
The chips themselves are anywhere from between $200 and $300, and the install only ran me about $100 because you can go to the local piercing shop who will obviously agree to do the installation.
All the programming and coding of putting the apps on the chip, that's all done by me.
Moving forward, Brandon is thinking about having other chips implanted in his body.
So it'll be inserted right under or right over your breast, and then you can tap your phone to your chest and instantly get temperature readings.
And with all this talk about chips, Brandon hopes the chip for the Tesla gets the attention of you-know-who.
It would make all this worth it if maybe just like a thumbs up from Elon or something or a simple emoji.
I don't know, that'd be pretty cool.
A thumbs up, my butt.
So this stuff is already going on.
Now, here's the obvious danger with that: it can be turned on, it can be turned off based on your corporate global government credit score.
Oh, yeah, you normalize all this stuff.
Look, it's my wallet.
Because whether you're aware of it or not, you're essentially already doing this.
You just don't have it installed in your hand.
You already have it with the card.
You can just swipe it down.
It reads your card.
You pay.
You already have it with your key fob.
You're in the area.
You can open it with just your hand.
You already have it in hotels or some people have this in their house.
You just put the card up next to the door lock and it unlocks.
So most people are already using this in one way, shape, or form.
It's just not installed in them.
But once you take this universal, once you take this universal, now all of a sudden, your chip that has everything on it, your vaccine card.
Oh, oh, you don't have your updated vaccine.
Oh, why won't my door unlock?
Why won't my car start?
Why can't I pay with my chip in my hand?
Oh, because you don't have your updated vaccine.
Oh, you heat your house now to 70 degrees in the winter.
Oh, why won't my car start?
Well, you use too much carbon.
You just had a steak dinner.
Oh, why can't I open my door?
Why can't I open my door?
Well, because you ate too much red meat.
And so that's obviously where that goes.
Now, if you can imagine somehow that being mingled and intertwined with the overall human machine merger.
Now you're talking about you're a biological android, and if you're not a good global government slave, then they just turn you off.
Oh, now you're talking about life and death potentially.
So there's obviously an inherent danger in this.
There's obviously an existential crisis that comes from this.
And if we're not aware of this and we just dive into this like dodo birds, then we become extinct.
But so what do you do?
All of this is inevitable.
Well, I suppose you could be like the Amish.
Seem to have a lot, right?
Hmm.
It's an option.
Might become more attractive by the decade.
Now, this is just a little comic relief, perhaps.
The real-life cyborg that implanted an antenna into his skull.
My name is Neil Harbison, and I'm one of the founders of the Cyborg Foundation.
And I'm a cyborg.
He's a cyborg.
He's a cyborg.
i am a cyborg to us a cyborg is a feeling It's feeling that you're not using technology, that you're not wearing technology.
It's feeling that you are technology.
Neil Harbison was born completely colorblind.
And while Neil still can't see color, a device called the iborg allows him to hear and sense colors.
It picks up the dominant color in front of me, and then it transposes this frequency of light into the frequency of sound.
So it's related to the frequency of light.
It's not an arbitrary relation.
This light frequency has a specific note, which is the note that I hear, but a few octaves lower so that it's in the audible range.
Neil has been able to hear color through Bluetooth.
It's like it would get annoying in 2004 when he convinced the doctor to anonymously perform a drastic surgery.
My head was drilled four times so that I could have the antenna integrated.
So it goes inside my skull.
So I actually feel cyborg.
I feel that even if I touch the antenna, I feel it's like a part of my body.
It really feels like a new body part.
There's no way of removing it.
So it's just like other animals, they have antennas.
I decided that I would have an antenna as well.
Neil says the iborg has expanded his senses beyond normal human capability.
I decided to include infrared colors and ultraviolets, which are invisible to the human eye, but that they can be perceived through our third eyes.
And then once this became normal, I didn't see why I should only perceive the colors that I have in front of me.
So I decided to have Bluetooth so I could receive colors from other places of the planet.
Neil isn't the only cyborg on this planet.
Professor Kevin Warwick implanted a chip in his arm in 1998.
A radio frequency identification device.
Entrepreneur Emil Grofstra, with RFID chips in each of his hands, can unlock his car or computer with a single wave.
His company Dangerous Things sells do-it-yourself body hacking kits.
Oh, nice.
Some gamers are in on the action too, using brain stimulators to gain superhuman focus.
Bionics researcher Michael McAlpine sees this type of technology advancing into the mainstream.
You know, up till now, I think most people have thought of bionics as people who have impaired capabilities like lost sight, giving them the ability to repair those capabilities.
But going forward, I think there is the possibility if you can do that, then you can also take that to the next step and actually give normal human advanced capabilities that biology never gave them and perhaps let them do what maybe only certain animals can do or maybe let them do what no one can do.
Neil Harbison's experience shows how quickly technology is transforming culture.
Social reaction has changed over the years.
So in 2004, people thought it was a light.
Later people started to think it was a microphone.
In 2006, I think they thought it was for chatting.
Then in 2009, people started to think it was a hands-free phone.
So they thought it was a new telephone.
Now people think it's something to do with Google Glass.
So it's changed over the years.
Now people think that I'm actually filming them, which creates uncomfortable situations.
So I'm thinking of changing the image and I might just move the sensor down so that it creates less confrontation with people that might think that I'm actually filming them.
But I'm sure that in two, three years, people will think it's something else.
It keeps changing.
Although some people still don't know how to react to the antenna, times are changing.
I think we are now entering the age of transition into cyber.
So we'll see more wearable technology becoming accepted and normalized.
Once wearing technology becomes something normal, we'll start seeing the transition into implanting the technology.
People will start accepting this more.
So in the 20s, the late 20s, we'll see more and more projects with new body parts and new senses.
And I believe that in the 40s, it will be normal to have technology implanted.
So it will be normal to merge humans and technology and to unite cybernetics and organisms.
I'm sure it will be normal to ask what are your extra senses and what's your new body part.
He's probably accurate.
He's probably accurate.
Now that video was from 2016, I believe.
He got the implant in 2004.
Oh, that video.
Yeah, that video was from March 2015.
So his prediction is pretty solid.
Now, here's an interesting one.
The death.
The death of the world's first human cyborg.
What prompted scientist Peter Scott Morgan to become part machine?
And did doing so really extend his life?
Keep watching for his fascinating journey into new frontiers of medical science.
On June 15th, 2022, Dr. Peter Scott Morgan's family issued a statement on his Twitter account that announced his death at the age of 64.
Scott Morgan was an American-British scientist known as the world's first full cyber.
No, it does have the level of mad scientist to it, doesn't it?
Or MND, also called amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
MND is a rare condition that affects the nerves and brain.
I guess you've got to be a mad scientist to do this, don't you?
Slurred speech, muscle cramps, and a weak grip, according to the UK's National Health Service.
Currently, there is no known cure for the disease, but patients with MND can undergo treatments to alleviate its symptoms.
Scott Morgan was given two years to live when he was diagnosed in 2017.
Despite his progressing illness, he remained optimistic about life and found ways to cope with his condition.
He always believed that technology would be able to save him.
He told Input magazine, All my early science education came from Doctor Who and Star Trek.
They taught me that if you're smart enough, brave enough, and have access to technology, anything's possible.
Scott Morgan decided that he was going to do whatever he could to live longer.
He did so by undergoing a series of surgeries to transform himself into a cybernetic organism, part human and part machine.
He said, I'm a prime candidate for the fast track to death, but I will pass on the offer.
I am frankly far too busy having fun.
Who would have thought that trying to cheat death was a full-time job?
Scott Morgan had the idea to remove the functions of his energy started failing.
The UK National Health Service notes that MND and its symptoms gradually get worse over time.
So moving, swallowing, and even breathing eventually get harder.
Patients undergo a combination of treatments, including physiotherapy and occupational and speech therapy, as well as diet changes.
Scott Morgan developed an avatar of his face before his muscles failed to function.
The idea was for the robotic face to correspond with the movements of the body with the use of artificial intelligence.
He also went under the knife for what he called a triple ostomy in 2018.
Input magazine describes the surgery as involving tubes being placed in his stomach, colon, and bladder to enable him to take in more nutrients.
He worked with physicians, designers, and technologists.
You know, there's a common thread here.
His goal was to rely on artificial intelligence to offer solutions to people who live with extreme disabilities.
Initially, doctors were hesitant to work with Scott Morgan about his plans, as there were risks involved that could further the disease's progression or even cause his death.
However, the optimistic scientist was adamant and he eventually found people to support him.
Next, he had his voice box removed to prevent him from choking on his own saliva.
He developed a way to communicate using a voice synthesizer.
And Times Now News reported it sounded almost like his real voice and not too robotic.
Whatever the odds, you can change everything.
In 2019, Scott Morgan completed his transformation into a full cyborg that he called Peter 2.0.
A 2020 TV documentary called Peter the Human Cyborg told the story of the scientist's journey.
It was edited together from footage of two years of Scott Morgan's life, from the planning stages with a team of experts up to his various surgeries.
Near the end of his life, Scott Morgan's MND had significantly progressed.
But thanks to technology, he was able to stand up, use a computer via eye tracking, and communicate with others.
After the success of his transformation, he said that he wasn't merely surviving with his disease, he was thriving.
Scott Morgan's death announcement made clear that he died surrounded by his family and closest friends.
Those who worked with him were saddened by the news, but his legacy continues.
The Scott Morgan Foundation makes use of AI technology to improve the lives of those who are extremely disabled.
The New York Post noted in his obituary that Scott Morgan once said that he was lucky to be a cyborg prototype so he could show the world the immense possibilities in revolutionizing humanity.
Through his persistence and positivity, he was able to prolong his life and give hope to those who may not have had any before.
Because whatever happens, we will learn from it and we will do it better the next time.
Now, what is the common, what is the common thread that we see in science fiction and in some of these stories of people trying to advance AI and advance cybernetics and merge humans with machines, whether it's chips or whether it's the human cyborg with the antenna where he smells colors and hears colors and stuff, or this list guy.
And it's always the same theme.
It's always the same thread of people trying to either cheat death or people trying to cheat the biological condition that currently consumes them.
And truth be told, that drive is responsible for the majority of inventions and the majority of advancements in human technology.
We don't want to freeze in our house, so we make heat.
We don't want to die in a storm, so we make shelter.
So again, it's not the instinct for survival and advancement is inherent.
It is undeniable.
It is undeniable.
The instinct of survival is undeniable in almost all biological life, but just like a lot of our humanity has been removed by technological advancements, just like a lot of what it means to be human that
most humans before us have experienced and the next generation of humans will never experience.
But now it's like time is not really linear.
Time is a spiral.
And so with every revolution, the spiral gets smaller.
And so naturally, the exponential growth of technology tightens the human experience insofar as my human experience is a lot closer to what my grandfather's experience was to what my granddaughter or grandson's experience will be close to what my human experience was.
In fact, it's likely that the experience that my grandchildren will have will resemble my human experience in such a small fraction of a percentage, it will be like a completely different experience.
We would probably not even consider it human.
And I really believe to a certain level, though, I really believe to a certain level, though, I mean, there might be other types of civilizations or communities that start up like the Amish where the Amish and
there's different cultures of Amish.
There's different levels of commitment to no electronics and what they'll accept and what they won't accept.
But there's no doubt going to be separate breakaway civilizations that won't accept any of the cybernetics, that won't accept any of the cyborgs, that won't accept man merging with machine, and they will maintain that tradition and maintain that commitment, just like the movie Surrogates.
If you've ever seen the movie Surrogates with Bruce Willis, it's a great movie.
I won't do a total spoiler alert, but it's a lot like that.
There's modern-day civilization where everybody has their surrogate, but then there's the breakaway civilization where surrogates are looked down upon, not allowed.
It's considered inhuman.
But of course, the non-surrogate community is way behind the surrogate community.
So this technology is inevitable.
Now we haven't even really gotten into the issue of AI.
And maybe now is the time to do that.
Now, this one is a little bit more innocent, I think, as far as an existential crisis or what it might mean to the future of humanity.
And that's AI.
Now, when I'm thinking about AI for this conversation, practically is the ability for us to now utilize AI at a consumption base level where I can get a number of different AI services or apps or whatever.
And let's just say, for the sake of this conversation, create images or create art.
Like, here's something I was thinking about.
Now, I have a creative mind, but I'm not the most talented at taking what's in my mind and putting it down into a consumable product, whether that's a design or whether that's a song or art or anything like that.
But now with AI, I can have a vision and I can use AI to create that vision.
But so where do you draw the line?
Where do you draw the limit?
There is a artist that you may know, and that's Alex Gray.
Now, Alex Gray is probably most known for his art that Toole uses for its albums and for its concerts.
But, I mean, it's some of the most beautiful, intricate, talented.
I mean, it makes you think.
It makes you wonder.
It tells a story.
It has historical significance.
It has mathematical significance.
It's one of a kind, you might say.
Now, if I go into an AI program, and I actually thought about doing this to prove a point.
If I go into an AI program and I say, mimic Alex Gray's art or produce for me a Alex Gray art and it somehow is able to recreate this.
Maybe it can, maybe it can't.
Maybe there's some levels of human creativity or ingenuity That AI cannot comprehend or reproduce yet.
But this is a one-of-a-kind artist.
Now, if AI can somehow recreate what Alex Gray makes, well, what does that do to Alex Gray?
Is that not a copyright issue?
Is that not an original original creativity issue?
Same with music.
Same with music.
There are whole AI albums out there.
Somebody made an entire Elvis album off AI.
In fact, I bet you we could pull that up.
Somebody played for me the other day.
Let's see.
This is apparently, this says it's an AI cover of Elvis' crazy little thing called love.
Let's see.
Let's see.
let's see what this is like.
So this is AI.
This thing cry drop to be the crime that is swayed.
Sounds more like Queen and Elvis.
Shakes all over like a jellyfish.
I kind of like it.
There goes my baby.
So look, anybody that's ever heard Elvis can know that's not Elvis, or anybody that knows Queen will be like, that sounds like Queen, not Elvis.
But see, the point is, this is where AI is taking it, where basically you can recreate anything with AI, whether it's music, whether it's art.
And I think where the rubber is going to meet the road here, which is, I don't know, maybe kind of sad.
I don't think it's going to be about copyright with music or art.
And it looks like they're going to be using Taylor Swift to do this.
And this whole buildup with Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey, you know, I've talked about this before.
If people are genuinely in love and they feel some way special for one another, then I really don't like to get in the middle of it.
I remember when it was Logan Paul and this, I guess his wife now, Nina is her name.
And everybody was making fun of him because I guess she's had a lot of boyfriends or a lot of celebrity boyfriends or whatever.
And I'm just thinking, you know, if these two genuinely love each other, then shut up.
What do you care?
What do you care if she's had sex with 100 guys or 200 guys?
If he doesn't care and he loves her, then so what?
I really don't care.
I don't like getting in the way of love.
If people can still find true love, then I say let them have it.
Whatever their story is.
Or it's all just promo.
It's all just gimmick.
And then they both know what they're doing and it's no big deal.
So I really don't like getting into the middle of this Travis Kelsey Taylor Swift thing.
But I will say, I will say that I've seen a psyop forming here for a long time.
And I can actually prove that.
But there's something going on here.
And it looks like it might be building.
It looks like it might be building to a point where they're going to use Taylor Swift to push some AI Legislation.
And because there have been because there have been lewd and crude AI-generated images of Taylor Swift, which, by the way, she's not the first.
She won't be the last.
By the way, this has happened to me.
I actually kind of found it funny, to be honest.
But actually, we started a group called the InfoWars Army, and some bad actors got in there and started doing deep fakes of me doing stuff I would obviously never do.
But it looks like Taylor Swift is going to be used to bring in some sort of AI legislation.
Now, I also think Taylor Swift is going to be used to push youth voters to the Democrat side of the aisle, and Travis Kelsey might just also go along for the ride.
So I do see that being set up.
And if they can get the male aspect of football fans on board with it as well, then that's just a level up to their propaganda.
You know, then there's, if you want to get real deep into it, is Taylor Swift a clone of Anton LeVay's wife?
Xena Schreck, former high priestess of the Church of Satan, the daughter of the Church of Satan founder Anton LeVay, Xena LeVay, Taylor Swift.
I mean, now we're getting real controversial here.
Now you're going real deep down the rabbit hill there.
But nonetheless, we're basically facing two inevitable inevitable existential crises and two inevitable advancements in technology.
They're going to change human civilization for the rest of time.
And that's artificial intelligence and the humans merging with machines.
Now, the problem is, I think, I mean, you could have a debate.
Is this the main issue we face?
Or is this just a side issue?
Is this just like an hors d'oeuvre or a dessert for the real issue we face right now in front of us, which is World War III and a centralized corporate world government?
These two things are right around the corner.
And there's no doubt AI and there's no doubt transhumanism are going to eventually be at the core of these two things.
The AI is going to be used to control it, but it won't be actual AI.
It'll be human-controlled AI by the corporate world government.
And the transhumanism aspect is just like with the cell phones, this thing can be used to track, trace, record everything, every movement, everything you say.
It can be shut off.
It can be turned on, except it's not going to be able to be shut off or turned on by you.
It's going to be permanent.
It's going to be permanently installed in you.
It's going to be you.
And if you're not a good corporate government slave, you can be turned on.
You can be turned off.
Your bank can be turned on.
Your banking can be turned off.
Your heat, your car, you can be locked out of your house, all of this stuff.
So we're kind of funneling towards, we're kind of funneling towards all of it happening at the same time.
Oh, you didn't get your COVID vaccine.
You're shut off.
Your brain chip is shut off.
Your chip in your hand is shut off.
Your banking is shut off.
all shut off.
And I really think, I mean, you're going to have to make choices.
The truth is, you're just going to have to make choices about how this is going to impact your life or if you can avoid it or if we as human beings can avoid it because you could make the same argument about this cell phone.
Is the cell phone inherently evil?
Can the cell phone be used for evil?
Has the cell phone caused us to lose much of our humanity?
How much time does the average human spend on a cell phone in January of 2024 versus January of 2004?
January of 1984.
From an individual that experienced life without a cell phone, life was much more enjoyable before the cell phone, and yet I have my cell phone on me.
I need my cell phone to work.
Am I evil?
Am I bad?
Are we all evil?
Are we all bad?
Is all of this inevitable?
Now, I'm going to go to another issue real quick, and then we'll take a couple phone calls before we sign off this evening.
But you want to talk about hardcore philosophy, Exerciseio says.
We'll get a little hardcore philosophical right now.
In fact, you want to know the most deep philosophies of my mind?
I would say that human civilization has ups and downs.
We've been through at least probably 30,000 years of ups and downs, technological advancements, living and dying, the peaks of civilization, back down to the dregs of civilization in at least probably four cycles, at least probably 30,000 years.
And I would say that this has mostly even been proven with archaeology and with documentarians like Graham Hancock, with discoveries like the megaliths, the Egyptian pyramids and hieroglyphs.
And there's no doubt that there has been technology on this planet that we do not understand, cannot comprehend, and cannot recreate.
We might even already be multi-dimensional, multi-universal.
We might already be off-world, whether that means physically or spiritually.
But with every cycle, which is most likely caused by weather or by the sun or by other planets, this cycle, maybe it's every 10,000 years, maybe it's every 3,000 years.
The elites might already know all this and are keeping this secret from civilization.
Hell, they might know that one of these apocalypse is coming in 200 years and it won't even matter.
But there's obviously quarter cycles of our inhabitable earth that has come in, wiped out civilization, restarted civilization.
To me, this is proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
And what happens with every cycle is that there's enough history that is saved or enough technology that is saved or enough documentation that is saved that the next cycle can kind of get to a certain level of advancement faster than the last cycle.
And so each cycle of human civilization gets a little more advanced than the one prior.
But it always inevitably will be wiped out unless you can get off world.
But I believe throughout these cycles, whenever we reach a certain level of technological advancement, like what we're about to reach with AI and humans merging with machines, we lose a bit of our humanity.
And what does that mean?
Our connection to the spiritual realm, our connection to God, the creator, our connection to our ancestors, our connection to our pineal gland and being able to utilize that, our ability for all kinds of what we might consider magical, impossible things humans were likely able to do 40,000 years ago.
And some would argue that this is even documented in ancient Egypt and that it's provable that human civilizations tens of thousands of years ago were somehow communicating with one another, if not traveling all around the planet when said abilities and technologies did not even exist.
But above all that, above all that, what does it mean?
It means that human beings are truly separated from all other life on this planet.
It means that human beings are a divine creation.
It means that human beings are supernatural and are a creation of God, the best we can understand it.
And that our connection to this universe and that our connection to the soul and the souls of our ancestors is something so magical and so divine.
And the further we get into this and the further we get into this, the farther we get away from that divine instinct, that divine connection, the spiritual world, the soul world, and everything that connected us to God the creator.
Now, there's a hundred other theories that stem from that.
But that's where we're at.
And there's already so much technology that goes on that we don't even know about.
Now, you know, I was going to get into Joe Biden starting a war in the Middle East, but you know what?
Let's not even do that.
This broadcast has been above all that.
I said I was sick of the politics, so I don't even want to go into that.
So you know what I will do?
I'll take some calls now.
But let's not forget everything is coming to you through the wolfpack.gold microphone.
Ladies and gentlemen, are you a member of the pack yet?
If not, what are you waiting for?
Wolfpack.gold, the only subscription that pays you back.
Become a member of the packet wolfpack.gold.
We did it.
We did a whole broadcast and we didn't get political really at all.
And, you know, I'm so glad.
It's so refreshing because I was just really burnt out on politics when I got home today.
And so I'm glad I decided to just rise above it and we did it successfully.
And don't worry.
When I go back on air hosting the InfoWars War Room tomorrow, we'll be right back into the political world.
I'm not saying I'm over it.
It's still my calling.
It's still, it's just, you know, I feel like maybe in a way I've kind of mastered it.
All right, putting the ego down.
Seriously, love you guys.
Tonight was it was fun to go off the beaten path here and get a little existential and cover some other stuff with you.
Thank you for sticking around.
And so we'll dedicate the final half hour or so to your calls.
And so here's how it goes.
It's line to line.
I pick it up.
I say, what's your name?
Where you're from.
You let us know and you are on the air.
So, first caller of the night.
What's your name?
Where are you from?
Hey, this is Matt.
All right, Matt, now you got 50% of the equation.
Where are you from?
Oh, sorry.
From Los Angeles.
Hey, man.
I just wanted to say what's up to all the Owen Lee fans out there, man.
We were joking about that.
I got to start a website.
I just, I got to start an Owen Lee fans website and start taking subscriptions.
You know, I'm really missing out here.
Right on.
Yeah, this is also Wonald Rump on the chat there.
But hey, man, I just wanted to, I just wanted to tell everybody also, I also work, I work in Hollywood.
And, you know, I'm a grip and I'm a film set worker.
And man, even after the strike now, it's still dead.
So I'm tripping on that.
And I mean, what do you mean?
Expand on that.
No, I'm saying, like, so I've called around to everybody as of today and just tried to extend that because everybody went on like disability leave because that way you keep your benefits, your hours, and you keep up your benefits and you're getting some kind of income, right?
So I reached out today after like this whole year almost to a lot of guys I haven't talked to, and they're telling me that it's really dead and there's not much going on.
So I don't know if it's like, you know, the downfall of Hollywood because, you know, I know everybody's sick of it.
I'm on your side.
Obviously, you know, I'm a fan of InfoWars, you and Alex and everything.
But it's just kind of scary because, dude, I've worked in this industry for 20 years and I live in LA and it's like $2,400 just for a one-bedroom apartment here.
Well, and there's going to be competitors.
There's going to be competitors with the standard Hollywood based in Los Angeles.
I know like Mel Gibson and Mark Wahlberg are trying to start a competitor to Hollywood.
I would love to work with them, man.
I'm sure you've heard of that based in Nevada.
There's some other stuff in Dallas.
There's some developing stuff in Austin, too.
So, I mean, there's Atlanta.
They did a lot of the Marvel movies out there.
And I've worked with those same guys that came out here for the LA reshoots, you know, like on Spider-Man and Doctor Strange and stuff.
So I've met some of those guys and they were like, and it's crazy, dude, because I'm like, dude, I'm an info warrior, dude.
And you can't even talk.
You know, I didn't get the vaccine, dude, of course, you know, because I heard David Icke talk about it.
I heard Alex and you.
And I was on a show where Sean Penn and Julia Roberts were the actors.
Sean Penn said everybody needs to be vaccinated by Monday or they can't be on the show.
I bailed.
They told me at Universal Studios a lot, I could go get somebody else.
He doesn't seem like a very bright guy.
What's that?
Sean Penn seems like a jerk and a moron.
Yeah, dude.
I mean, I bailed on that show.
And then obviously that whole crew looked at me like, this guy's a Trump supporter.
This guy's a freak show, you know?
So I got like, you know, demonized and everything.
But look at me, man.
I mean, none of those guys have died, but I know some people in the industry that have died, like a good, solid, like a guy that was a SETI cam operator.
He died in his car on lunch on one of the shows.
I was like, how did that happen?
You know, that whole industry is also going to be impacted majorly by artificial intelligence.
Oh, dude, totally.
It's already, it's already, yeah, exactly.
Those people that went to school and are great artists and this and that.
That's really going to happen fully because it's, yeah, that's definitely happening.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Well, hey, dude, it's great to talk to you, man.
Get to another caller.
Thank you for the call, Matt.
Good to hear from you.
And we'll do just that.
Next caller, what's your name?
Where you're from?
Yeah.
Yes, this is Albert from Pennsylvania.
Yeah.
Hi, Albert.
Hey, Owen.
I wanted to touch on the whole man merging with machine, you know, tech stuff.
And I think there's a good point to be made that I noticed in a lot of those stories about people wanting to turn themselves almost into a superhuman or a computer or something.
And it all has to do with, it seemed to me like trying to become immortal or trying to cheat death or cheat fate or something like that.
100%.
And absolutely.
And it struck me that there is an absence of accepting God or some greater power than yourself and viewing yourself almost as your own master.
And it seems like, I don't know, like I always think back to if you look up the 12 steps of addiction and they can be applied to, you don't necessarily have to be an alcoholic or a drug addict or anything to learn and gain from the 12 steps of addiction.
And basically, the first two are the most important.
The first is to realize that you're powerless against what you're fighting.
And the second is to accept that you need to give over everything to God and accept that there's something greater than yourself that will ultimately help heal you.
And I think that we've completely lost that as a society.
Well, there's no doubt it's been lost.
I mean, not that I'm fully playing devil's advocate, but I think it's a fair question to ask.
You know, God, the creator gave us the ability to make all this stuff.
It's up to us whether it's used for good or evil.
Would you agree?
No, absolutely.
Some would argue, because some would argue it's fallen angels.
Some would argue it's demonic influence.
No, I mean, I understand, you know, and I've seen those arguments, and I understand where that comes from.
But, you know, I believe, you know, I believe that there is absolutely a positive benefit to technological advancements and that we live in, you know, obviously a much more, I guess you could say, easier time to live daily life than it was 100 years ago.
But I believe that instead of accepting that something greater than us is giving us the power and ability to do these, you know, advancements in these things is missing because you never really hear too much, you know, thanking God for something.
I believe even with the vaccine thing, I believe it was Cuomo or somebody like just completely rejected that.
That no, it's thanks to the vaccine.
It's not thanks to God.
And, you know, of course, the vaccines were nothing of God.
Those were evil, but it's just a general idea that you can't acknowledge God or accept God.
And we even saw that with football a couple weeks ago with, I believe it was C.J. Stroud.
Oh, yeah.
Yeah, he got censored for thanking God.
And I just feel like it's so crazy how they did that because it really was not like that 20 years ago.
I even remember because it was massive in the Christian community when Kurt Warner, after the Rams won the Super Bowl in 2000, Kurt Warner got up there and accepted the Lombardi trophy and said, I want to thank Jesus Christ, my Lord and Savior.
And it was huge.
It was like you hadn't heard an athlete talk like that really on a big stage in quite some time.
And it kind of led to a bit of a small but felt Christian resurgence in professional athletes, specifically in St. Louis.
But then it was like after that, the media made it an intent to make sure that Christianity was not felt in the sports world, whether that's because they are demonic or hate God or they just think it's bad for ratings.
But nonetheless, it's undeniable.
They got rid of Sage Steele because she would put a crucifix behind her when they had to host from home during COVID.
CJ Stroud says, I want to praise Jesus Christ, and they cut it from his interview.
I mean, it's so obvious.
No, no, totally.
Totally.
And I mean, if you talk about the, no, I agree that there used to be a more Christian presence in sports and stuff like that.
I mean, going back to, you know, one of my favorite topics, and I know it's obviously yours, is professional wrestling.
In the late 90s, Stone Cold got the whole idea of Austin 316 from seeing the John 316 signs at sporting events and stuff like that.
Which obviously, you know, even if they still do exist, they're never going to show them on TV.
But no, I just feel like a lot of this is really going in the wrong direction because of the lack of accepting God and spirituality.
Yeah, and it's the whole human evolution lie too, that we weren't created and designed by God.
That's a big part of it.
Thank you for the call.
Next caller.
What's your name?
Where are you from?
My name is Sawd, and I'm from Gabo.
Hell yeah.
I'm surprised.
Are you calling?
Are you calling me from underneath piles of rubble?
No, I'm kidding.
I'm actually from Illinois.
How you doing, Owen?
Hey, what's up, Saud?
Well, my friend, my question for you is, what do you think about the combination of the Biden administration and the Zionists slow locking us into what looks like World War III?
Seems like it looks like an attack is imminent, according to the scumbag media.
Well, do you want to out yourself right now or do you want to keep yourself, do you want to keep yourself under wraps?
I mean, it's up to you, but you can say whatever you'd like.
Well, we'll keep you under wraps for now.
But I actually, why isn't this working?
I want to try to pull something up because I'm going to have to pull it up on Twitter.
Band.video.
Unfortunately, banned out video is under massive cyber attack right now.
What else is new?
Yeah, what else is new?
But let me show something here since you bring this up.
Last Friday, I did a segment on the InfoWars War Room titled, Warning, a Military False Flag May Be the Only Thing to Save the Military Industrial Complex and Its Client States, its client states being Israel and Ukraine.
And then what happened over the weekend, that drone strike, where they say, oh, it was confused.
It flew over our airspace, but we didn't know it wasn't ours.
And we thought it was ours.
And we stood down because we thought it was ours.
I mean, come on.
Are we really that incompetent and inept at the military level?
Or was this done intentionally?
Now, it's hard for them to prescribe responses with Joe Biden because they can't come out and say, Joe Biden's going to address the nation at 7 o'clock tonight because Joe Biden might be knee-deep in his own shit-filled diaper.
And so they can't plan press conferences like that.
But if the Biden administration comes out and launches a larger footprint into the Middle East, then I think it just shows that, yep, it's exactly what we thought.
The military-industrial complex needs to shed blood, just like Israel needed bloodshed for them to go into Gaza.
It's going to be the same thing, and it's going to be the U.S. military being used to launder weapons, launder money, launder warfare by their client states, and it's the same players in the same game.
All right, I got one other small question.
I agree with that.
Do you think it's more likely that they'll use the law fair against Donald Trump to try to keep him out?
Or do you think it's possible that they'll escalate this conflict in the Middle East to avoid an election altogether?
Because that's what I'm the most worried about.
I'm curious to hear what you think.
I'd say probably the latter because I don't think they can use the law fair to keep Donald Trump out.
I think that they wanted to use the law fair to separate Donald Trump from his voters.
That's failed.
They had this agenda to get Donald Trump removed from the ballot, and it looks like that's going to fail.
So they're going to have to do something else at this point.
Even trying to steal the election like they did in 2020 is going to be hard for them to pull off because so many people are already expecting that and are going to be watching that intently.
So I've been saying, I think with all the different, if I'm a political odds maker or geopolitical odds maker, right now my odds on favorite is expanded war in the Middle East, major, major false flag event to draw the United States even into a direct war situation.
I think that's your odds on favorite for the next big shoe to drop before the 2024 election.
Well, my satellite signal here in Gaza is getting a little murky, but I think that's a very good take, my friend, as always.
Appreciate that.
Well, it's got to be tough from under all the rubble.
Thank you for the call.
Let's take another caller now.
What's your name?
Where are you from?
It is Levy Eric from FEMA region for I am a cyber.
Oh, yeah.
Can you smell this broadcast?
I don't know where to start.
You have fried my brain chip.
Oh, no.
So you're like Joe Biden.
And what am I doing here?
Hey, hey, Jack, I don't need no NeuroLeague chip, man.
I put that hard hat on backwards because I'm cool.
I'm cool.
I got that from Corn Pop.
But I do want to say, you know, I've been reading the chats tonight and hats off to the people in the chat because this shit is hilarious.
There's some heathens in the chat.
There is.
But you hit it.
I'm opening up the gates of hell.
Some just a sudden border is good to see you, man.
I'm glad you didn't run in front when I was a collegiate all-American.
What an embarrassment this guy is.
Where's Kamala, by the way?
What's she up to?
You seen her anytime recently?
Where's that fool?
I'm the border czar.
But I will tell you, pre and post cell phone days, it's the dumbing down of society.
And no doubt about that.
last wednesday night i don't know if you're going wednesday or not but uh maynard he he called everybody out he's like uh whoa whoa whoa wait wait wait wait wait uh you went to the tool concert last week Oh, yes.
Oh, yes.
What happened?
Actually, you know what?
Don't tell me.
Don't tell me.
Let's talk next week.
Let's talk next week.
All right.
Enjoy and we will talk next week.
It was good, though.
You liked it?
I mean, obviously, the concert was amazing, but you're saying that he didn't do anything.
There was no libtard.
It was good.
It was straight?
No, no, no, no, no political aspect whatsoever.
That was fantastic.
Then you took it tonight, man.
I could talk to you for hours on end.
And then you took it to Alex Gray.
And it's like, then you nailed it with Trailer Swift.
You know, she is nothing but the kickstart of a myth disinformation agenda.
Literally, you know, Ministry of Truth, you can't believe anything other than what we tell you.
That is exactly what is happening there.
Yeah.
You know, the whole Taylor Swift thing is so strange, too.
What, I mean, because is she a clone of Anton LeVay's daughter or wife or whatever that crazy thing is?
I mean, she looks just like her.
She looks like easily a daughter, if not a clone.
But see, Taylor Swift.
You know, I don't care for, I don't care for conspiracy shit.
I can't stand Q-tard nation, any of that BS.
And it's just, I'll tell you what, man, she looks just like Anton LeVay's wife.
No, no question.
But it cannot be denied.
No matter how you feel about Taylor Swift, she is, or at least at one point, was an extremely talented musician.
I mean, she was touring the country at 16, playing the guitar and singing her albums when she was 15 and 16 years old.
I mean, that was real.
I saw it.
I get it.
Unfortunately, I read people's situation scenarios like books, and I didn't like her from day one.
And hell, I sent you.
Yeah, I mean, I didn't really like her music either, but she did a free concert in St. Charles, Missouri.
She did two in a row, actually.
And I went with my friends because, you know, we were 15 years old at the time, too.
And there were a bunch of 15, 16-year-old girls that like to go and jump up and down at her concerts.
So, you know, we kind of had a good time.
Absolutely.
How about the one ship cuck?
He looked exactly like Ivanka's husband, Jared.
In that video.
I can't go.
No, I can't do it, Rick.
I can't do it.
I can't go down it.
You said I can't do it.
All right.
We'll catch up next week after Tool.
All right.
One last call for the evening.
What's your name?
Where are you from?
Gene and Georgia.
What's up?
You say Gene?
Gene and George.
All right, Gene.
Man, what are you doing on this time of night?
Brother Owen, I'll tell you what's the truth.
I didn't realize that you even had something going on this time of night.
So Monday nights, and every once in a while, if something's breaking, but Monday nights from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. Central Time, I'm live right here on my Twitter account and on rumble.com/slash Owen.
I don't know if you're on Rumble or Twitter.
Most people here are on Rumble, but yeah, every Monday night.
And then, you know, if there's breaking news or a rally or something I want to cover, I might pop on at night too.
Yeah, I got you, brother.
Man, let me tell you something, Brother Owen.
God's with you, just like he is with Alex, man.
The prayers that you got going when you was in prison, man, and the way you come out and spoke your piece and was very open about it and told people what you felt and the love of people in this country.
This is a God, this and God we trust is on our money.
And I guess I just want to tell you that y'all are doing a lot of good things, opening people's eyes and ears.
And maybe, you know, there's a lot of truth out there, and y'all are giving it.
And that's all I want to do.
Just tell you what a good job y'all doing.
And we're all going to overcome and win in the end.
But God bless you.
Thank you for that, Gene.
That means a lot.
And I did feel those prayers.
Let me tell you.
They shook and rattled the cage, the multiple cages I was in loose so that I could get out early.
I really mean that.
All right.
We're about to sign off here.
Thanks to everybody for tuning in.
Remember to go to at Owenschroyer1776.
Give me a follow or go to rumble.com/slash Owen.
Follow me there too.
Subscribe to the updates so you know when I go live.
Okay, this is a little strange, but you may have noticed me kind of fiddling around with my teeth there.
Earlier today, I had a crown on my tooth pop loose.
I think I swallowed half of it, and then the other half just fell out while I was live on air.
Didn't stop me, though.
So I think I'm going to need to go to the dentist tomorrow morning.
That was a little, that was a little awkward.
All right, ladies and gentlemen, that does it for tonight.
Thanks to everybody that tuned in.
Oh, oh, oh, remember, remember, last chance for this apparel at the end of the month, we're resetting the apparel at owenschroyer.store.
Last chance, last chance for this current apparel line at owenschroyer.store.
And so we're going to change it up.
We're going to change it up as soon as February starts.
So last chance.
Order a size small.
Order a size small.
It tends to run a little large, at least with the tops.
With the bottoms, you might be okay ordering your normal size, but with the tops, I'd maybe order a size down.
So last chance over there at owenschroyer.store for that apparel.
All right, guys.
You know what time it is?
You know what time it is when we rock out.
When we rock out and close the store.
Close the show, rather.
Get out your dancing memes.
Load up the Rumble chant.
I want all the dancers.
I need all the dancers in the Rumble Ranch right now.
Get them out.
I sign off.
I'll see you guys tomorrow on the InfoWars War Room, band.video, 3 p.m.
Central Sharp.
Yep.
Function mediocrity on the shelf.
Not more things are safe and easy.
Get a life that go to what you're comfortable with.
▲
Export Selection