Tuesday War Room: ATF Says Bullet That Struck Charlie Kirk Does NOT Match Robinson’s .30-06, More NATO Allies Block U.S. Military Flights for Iran War… PLUS, Christian Athletes Rally Behind Ex-Bulls Player Who Denounced NBA Pride Night - FULL SHOW - 03.31.2026
Harrison Smith opens the March 31, 2026 War Room by exposing Mayor Brett Smiley's removal of a Ukrainian mural and NBA player Jaden Ivey's firing for opposing Pride Month. The host alleges a global energy lockdown orchestrated by white-majority nations to enforce a New World Order, while claiming Benjamin Netanyahu funded Hamas via Qatar to manufacture the October 7th attacks for a "Greater Israel Project." Smith argues Republicans prioritize Israel over America, silencing dissenters like Nick Fuentes, and warns that Zelensky may negotiate nuclear weapons with Israel against Russia. Ultimately, the episode suggests deep state corruption and foreign subservience are collapsing American sovereignty. [Automatically generated summary]
But yeah, we're a quarter of the way through the year already, and that to me is shocking.
We have a lot of news, of course, to cover, and I'm going to take a lot of your phone calls today.
No guests, so we will be taking your phone calls in the second half of the program.
Let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 31st of March, 2026.
Double standard Democrats get mural of Irina Zarutska removed despite liberal love of George Floyd.
On Monday, social media began to trend with the case of hypocritical liberals getting a nearly complete mural for murdered Ukrainian refugee Irina Sarutska in Rhode Island taken down, with many commenters pointing out the left's love of George Floyd.
The nearly complete mural of slain Ukrainian refugee Irina Zarutska in Providence is being removed after Jewish mayor Brett Smiley called for it to be taken down.
The murder of the individual depicted in this mural was a devastating tragedy, but the misguided, isolating intent of those funding murals like this one across the country is divisive and does not represent Providence, said Smiley.
It's because she's white.
I just want everybody to know, doesn't matter if you're a refugee, doesn't matter if you're Ukrainian, doesn't matter if you're a liberal BLM supporter.
Fact is you're white, you're therefore bad.
This was a mural of a black criminal, then there'd be no problem with it.
I know because Providence, Rhode Island spent $38,000 spraying Black Lives Matter on the street last year or the year before.
So they're not concerned about what's divisive or not.
They're concerned about uplifting white people.
So that's the central concern they have is making sure that white people, even if they're totally innocent refugees fleeing from a war, being stabbed and murdered in cold blood for no reason by a black guy who, after he murders her, says, got that white girl.
Meanwhile, Christian athletes come to defense of NBA player fired for criticizing League's Pride Month events.
We'll get back into this.
Jaden Ivey, a former player for the NBA's Chicago Bulls, was let go by the team on Monday after he criticized the League's Pride Month celebrations as unrighteous according to his Christian faith.
Yes, folks, you can be a wife beater.
You can be a rapist.
You can be a statutory rapist, pedophile.
You will not be let go of your NBA team.
However, if you're Christian, you better watch out, okay?
And that's actually what's going on here.
We'll get back into that.
United Nations human rights diplomat resigns, warns UN preparing for possible use of nuclear weapon against Iran.
United Nation human rights diplomat Mohammed Safa resigned from his position on Sunday, claiming the international organization may soon use a nuclear weapon in Iran.
While the UN itself does not have nuclear weapons, members such as the U.S. or Israel who are at war with Iran could deploy nukes against the Middle East nation.
We'll get back into this.
There's a couple potential options for them using nukes.
And I'll break it all down on the other side.
Meanwhile, oil slides, as Trump reportedly has told AIDS, he's now willing to end the war without reopening, which I just funny.
I don't know to me, that's, I don't know, something about that is funny to me.
That it's gone from these overarching, very, you know, ambitious goals for the Iran war of totally, you know, taking the country and installing a new regime to actually, we just want to get the Strait of Hormuz open, right?
As of yesterday, the goals of the war were to mitigate the consequences of the war.
And now we're not even doing that.
And now it's like, actually, we just lost.
We just lost completely.
We started a fight, got knocked to the ground, got our face rubbed in the dirt, and now we're going to go home.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars studios here in Austin, Texas.
A lot going on when it comes to the war in Iran.
Again, it's just every 12 hours.
The entire scope of the war changes dramatically.
I don't think it ever was intended to be anything other than what it is, a total disaster quagmire excuse for the New World Order to implement yet again, even greater and more stringent lockdowns than they ever achieved under COVID.
Remember, it's different this time.
They don't need your permission.
They will just cut off the oil.
And this is already being implemented in various countries around the world with other countries planning a massive global lockdown exactly like COVID.
And it's so funny because I was saying something on X yesterday about what's happened already in the Iran war and where it goes from here and just the disastrous outcomes that are all but inevitable at this point.
People are like, oh, you know, doomer, you know, whatever, a black pillar, whatever.
And it's like, I was thinking back and I was like, well, last couple of times I've had reticence like this.
I've had like a, you know, an anxious feeling about the future like this.
I can think of a couple, you know, pretty prime examples.
One of them would have been like January, February 2020, seeing the lockdowns of COVID, seeing the way things were going in that regard and just going, okay, this is bad.
It's not going to be two weeks.
They're locking us down fully.
They're going to just try to destroy the economy.
They're going to keep people imprisoned in their houses until they come out with the vaccine.
And all of this is probably in service of getting Trump out of office.
And of course, 2020 was like the most disastrous year in American history.
Then again, in like August of 2020, when we still hadn't gotten rid of the lockdowns and people were still going, it can't go on much longer, can it?
It's been a couple months now.
It'll probably let up soon.
And I, again, made a prediction.
Then I said, actually, I think they're going to keep it locked down until election day.
I think they're going to use mail-in ballots to cheat.
I think it's going to be so obvious that they cheated, that people are going to be enraged and pissed off and angry at this.
And then they're going to, you know, use that anger of the fact they stole the election to claim that saying the election was stolen is terrorism.
And they're going to try to use all of that anger that they generate to piss off Republicans, get us to do something stupid so they can claim we're all domestic terrorists.
And then it just, it happened exactly like that.
So I don't, I'm not a doomer all the time.
I'm not always predicting doom.
It's just there are certain times when all of the components line up and without a dramatic and universal change, it's inevitable, the disaster that we're going into.
So again, I'm not a doomsayer all the time, but when I do predict doom, I tend to be right.
So just take that, take that into account.
I'm going to go to a couple videos here.
Like I said, obviously, the major upshot of all of this is massive lockdowns across the globe.
Let's go to clip number five here.
Leaked reports threaten energy lockdowns within 21 days in New Zealand and Australia.
They're already having sanctions or rationing going on there.
But no, they already have a pre-planned global lockdown schedule that they are now announcing quietly.
Australia and New Zealand could see energy lockdowns within 21 days.
This is from two leaked reports.
Well, one of them was leaked.
One of them was published today by each government.
Both countries' governments are now modeling.
They say they're actively modeling.
This is a declaration that has been made that they are modeling the worst case scenarios for the country, for the economy, and for citizens.
And we know what they mean when they say measures.
They are talking about energy lockdowns.
We'll cover Australia in the first part of the video, and then we'll cover New Zealand in the second part of the video.
But let me tell you the official name of the declaration from New Zealand.
This is called the Fuel Response Plan 2026 overlay.
And it's in response to measures that they put in place in 2024 for this worst case scenario.
Now, when you read that report and when you actually look at some of the things they've said, it's weird to me that they knew this was coming, have no refinery capabilities, and yet they didn't do what the IEA said, which was to have an emergency stockpile of energy fuels.
If you're from New Zealand, drop a comment below.
How on earth has this happened?
And if you missed Wednesday's video, it's way too long to recap all of it here.
But it was about these energy lockdown scenarios that have been published by the IEA.
And they've gone out to governments all around the world who are now actively modeling and preparing for what they say are energy lockdowns.
And I want to quote from their official guidance, okay?
It says, and I quote here, these energy lockdowns would be far more severe than anything we saw during the COVID lockdowns.
That's from the International Energy Agency who created this report, which is called Sheltering from Oil Shocks.
And remember what they have recommended in their report.
They have recommended to governments around the world that lockdown measures go into place.
And again, I'm quoting directly from these reports.
The Fuel Response Plan 2026 in New Zealand written in 2024, where they said, you know, here's what's going to happen if and when there's a disruption for the flow of oil.
Not a lot of instances that would result in the restriction of the flow of oil to places like New Zealand.
The Strait of Hormuz shutting, one of the only ones.
So as they're looking forward in time from 2024, it seems like they were aware in some regard of the fact that this would be happening.
And they did nothing to stock up.
They did nothing to keep a reserve because it's on purpose, because this is the design.
This is what they want.
They wanted to stock up and have plenty of fuel for their citizens.
Then they wouldn't need to lock down.
They could have done that.
They knew what was coming.
They had the foresight, make the plan to ration everything.
Why didn't they make the plan to store up a bunch of fuel?
Because it's on purpose, obviously.
This is coming.
Now, he said at the very end there, way more significant lockdowns than anything we've ever seen before, anything under COVID will pale in comparison to what we're about to see.
They don't make these plans.
They don't make these moves and these pre-staging activities if they don't intend to follow through.
This is coming.
It's going to arrive very shortly.
They're going to lock down the world on the basis of a lack of fuel that they have deliberately engineered.
How could this possibly be an accident?
And again, just put everything into it, right?
This wouldn't even be an issue if they had their own refineries, if they sourced their own energy fuels.
I mean, it's the same in every single white country in the world.
I was going to say European.
New Zealand's not European.
Australia is not European.
They are white, traditionally, historically.
Europe, of course, is exactly the same story.
America, of course, is exactly the same story.
At least Trump has done some to free up energy, but obviously under Joe Biden, they did things like shut down the, what was it, colonial pipeline for absolutely no reason, stopped new Keystone pipeline from being built.
They are deliberately cutting us off from our energy sources so that they have an excuse to enslave us.
Again, it's just not complicated at all.
UK sitting on one of the biggest oil natural gas reserves in the North Sea, not tapping it.
Sitting on practically endless coal reserves, not digging it up.
Germany systematically went through and eliminated all of its nuclear reactors.
I could have told you that was a bad idea.
In fact, I think I did.
Doesn't matter.
They did it anyway.
But it wasn't just that.
I mean, they destroyed everything.
Here's a coal power plant that they destroyed in Germany.
No reason to.
It was working fine.
In fact, I believe this coal power plant cost like billions and billions of dollars and had been built like three years before.
I think it was like $23 billion, if I'm not mistaken.
And they just destroyed it.
Why?
Because Greta Thunberg was sad.
I mean, the reasons they gave you people to do this, it's just unbelievable.
People fell for this.
But hey, it's easy to destroy.
Hell of a lot more difficult to rebuild.
So it's not being rebuilt.
So they're sourcing their energy from elsewhere.
So the flow can be cut off and they can be rationed.
I just don't.
I don't understand.
This is what I don't get.
It's like on every issue, every issue has been divided in two sides.
It almost seems arbitrary, like what side takes up which position.
It's crazy.
And that's, I'm trying to figure out how to say this, how to say this exactly, because it's a common thing that I talk about all the time, especially when it comes to a place like Israel, where it's like Spain is standing up against Israel.
And actually, right now, a lot of European countries are standing up against Israel.
Italy just came out denouncing Israel very harshly, saying that they've crossed the red line and that they'll be sanctioned.
France has said they're no longer cooperating with Israel at all.
Spain has said they're not letting America use their bases anymore.
But Spain's gone even farther and they've been very like anti-Israel.
At the same time, people running Spain who are very, very anti-Israel are also giving out half a million citizenship waivers to random Africans that made it into their country.
They're murdering depressed girls who were raped in a state orphanage and then the crime was covered up.
It's like they're just awful in every possible way, but they seem to be right about Israel.
Europe, kind of the whole continent is like this, where it's like, hey, at least their food is edible.
Like they're wrong about everything, but at least their food is edible.
Europe slams Israel over death penalty bill and freedom of religion.
I mean, yeah, the death penalty bill, we'll get into that because it's just everything is false dichotomies.
So we'll get back into the death penalty thing.
But the thing I really don't understand is it's like, okay, all of these topics seem to be split into two, and you got to take one side or the other.
And it's always the worst side that gets what they want.
Like every single time.
I don't understand it, to be quite frank with you.
And we'll get into a lot of other examples throughout this.
But it really does seem like it's just impossible to find any political movement at all that represents more than 50% of the population.
And while they might believe some things that are just like basically true, just like very basic and simple and obvious, I don't know.
It's just like the craziest extremists that will believe that.
I just, I really don't get what the hell is going on in the world.
So why the hell did all of Europe give up its energy production?
Why the hell did we close the straight of Hormooth?
Why did we attack Iran?
Like, why is any of this happening if it's not on purpose?
That's when you understand, okay, the world, the European nations, America, everywhere, basically, except for, you know, a few places that you can probably figure out, Iran, Russia, China.
They're all controlled by psychopaths that are trying to set up a one-world government and they need to eradicate mass amounts of humans in order to do that.
First and foremost, the humans that would stand up against such a tyrannical manifestation.
So then everything makes sense.
Then it's like, oh, okay, this all makes sense.
It's still infuriating, and it's only possible because of the willing blindness of everybody underneath.
And I don't get how we break out of this false out of all of these false dichotomies, I should say.
Again, like we need to be heading this off at the past.
Like right now, they're modeling, you know, the models.
So the models that they use to tell everybody that COVID would kill everybody, that they used to justify the insane lockdown measures that were more damaging than the virus itself.
It's those same type of models that they're now running.
United Kingdom was one of the world's earliest adopters of coal.
I mean, I've explained it before.
And like, this is the thing.
It's like when I think about what we as Americans need to do to free ourselves, like we can't be divided against ourselves.
We have to come together and say, at the very least, can we not agree that America should be America first, that our government should represent us and not a foreign nation?
Like all of this seems obvious.
But like in the outreach to the leftists, like you guys got to stop being idiots.
You got to stop falling for the bullcrap.
Can we not all understand that Bill Gates does not have your best interests in mind when he's running programs?
I mean, we've been through, I may as well just play the pitch meeting about climate change, although that one's not as popular as others.
I think people think I'm making it up.
But like everything in the pitch, in the climate change pitch meeting, you can find on Axe at Harrison H. Smith, it's all just straight out of the headlines.
Like the stories about, oh, they're no longer burning coal because that produces carbon, so now they're cutting down forest in America, shipping it across the ocean, burning the trees and calling that carbon neutral.
Like that's insane.
That's not the least of the insanity, 12 million trees cut down in Scotland to build windmills, deforesting parts of the rainforest to have a climate change agenda.
Meeting a startup by Bill Gates that is literally cutting down trees and burying them, just burying them, not using them for anything, just deforesting an area, burying the trees in the ground and calling it carbon capture sinks.
So the trees, the natural filters that take in carbon dioxide and put out oxygen, those are being cut down and destroyed while they're producing giant machines to try to siphon the carbon out of the air through gigantic filters.
It's, I mean, this is all absurd.
So like, how do we come together on the left like I, I genuinely want to sit down the left and be like, do you really think anybody in the world is spraying sulfuric acid or ionized aluminum into the atmosphere because they love you?
Do you really think that's what they're doing?
Do you really think they're so concerned about preserving life on earth that they're going to irreversibly poison the stratosphere?
It's like, okay, maybe you have your head on straight when it comes to like surveillance or big government or with a welfare state, but then, like you will fight to the death for the right of blackrock to buy up every home in the state.
It's like what is going on?
Why can people not just see the truth for what it is?
It really is the biggest problem in the world and like the exclusive problem that we have to try to solve.
It really shouldn't be this difficult to come together on all of this.
And on that note, I want to go to clip 29 here.
This is, uh, Brandon Stracha of the WALK AWAY Movement gave probably the best speech at CPAC this year.
Uh, Brandon Stracha, clip 29 he's calling out, and he did it in such a brilliant way that it it doesn't come across this way, but what he's actually doing here is directly calling out the mega Israeli foreign influence in MAGA that is trying to dictate and control the conversation.
Because what he's asking is, when did we become the left?
And, by the way, the ROKE, the woke right as they like to call it, the woke right are not the ones who are acting like the left.
We're not the ones calling everybody nazis and racist and bigots in order to shut them down because we can't actually win debates.
That's the the mega side of things.
That is the uh establishment Republican neon, Neocon side of things that's doing that.
When I was going through my hell, only two members, elected members of Congress took my phone calls.
Two, that was Lauren Marjorie was one of the only elected members of Congress to visit Jay Sixers in prison.
She was the only member of Congress to sponsor the Matthew Lawrence Perna Bill, named after one of the Jay Sixers who committed suicide due to the brutality he endured at the hands of the United States government.
And a few years ago, she came to the walkaway booth at CPAC and held my hands and prayed with me while the media took pictures of us and mocked us.
And now a directive has gone out that Marjorie Taylor Greene is a traitor.
And if you want to be a part of the in crowd, it is mandatory that you must hate her too.
If I were to ask, probably at least half the people in this room would say that they didn't like her anymore.
And if I were to ask why, I bet the majority wouldn't even know themselves.
When did we become the left?
When did we become high-minded, mean, and tribal?
When did we decide that not only must we cancel those we disagree with, but we must control the people around us with intimidation, demanding that they think the way we think and join the cancel mob too, or be branded themselves?
And when did we allow some of the most toxic, nasty, and vicious people on the planet to become the spokespeople for MAGA and the arbiters of purity tests, deciding who is and isn't worthy enough to continue to call themselves MAGA?
But perhaps most importantly, when did we decide that it was off limits to question our own government or the government of any other country?
Let me tell you something.
If you call yourself a patriot, but you believe that it is your obligation to only praise and only worship your president, then you must not be a patriot of this country because leader worship is how citizens behave in nations that aren't free.
You can love your president and you should, but it is your duty and your obligation as a free citizen of the United States of America to challenge and question your government every day, regardless of who the president of the United States is.
And this sort of gets down to the fundamental characteristics of America.
And I was thinking about this especially with the passing of the death penalty law in Israel, which I believe, unless I'm mistaken, represents the first time ever that a country has passed a law in which one ethnic group can be given the death penalty, but that that punishment is spared other ethnic groups.
So the Palestinians now, when accused and denied the right to trial, can be executed by Israel.
And they're celebrating this and they're cheering this.
And I'll show you some videos about this a little bit later.
But it just strikes me that it is diametrically opposed to like the first sentence of our founding document.
Like you can't get any more like primordial than we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.
Now, obviously, that's been perverted and twisted to represent some sort of weird equality where we're supposed to pretend that a person with 70 IQ and a person with 160 IQ should somehow score the same on test.
That's never what it meant.
It meant that in the eyes of God and in the eyes of justice, that every man was born, you know, morally a blank slate.
How can you justify anything that Israel does in that paradigm?
How could you possibly claim that anything Israel does represents the West or American interests?
Everything they do is diametrically opposed to everything we believe in.
And that's the same of the left wing in this country.
And it's the same, a lot of supposed MAGA, you know, neocon infiltrators at this point.
We don't have to like debate about what our country's morals are.
They were written down in documents, and they're firmly rooted in a metaphysical perception of the world that's derived from Christianity.
That everything our leadership does, everything our banking class does, everything the foreigners do, and everything the left does is all diametrically opposed to.
It's just obvious.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the war room.
Please do find and share these videos at infowars.com forward slash show, banned.video.
We got a lot of corruption to try to sort through here.
And I want to go back and just, there's been some newly released information, or rather, newly popularized information, but it corresponds to and sort of dovetails with everything else we've already known.
Of course, over the weekend, the Tucker Carlson Network made the BB files public.
That's a documentary about Benjamin Netanyahu.
It was actually published, I believe, in like November 2024, something around that.
But this was the first time it was released for free and publicly, I guess.
And it's gone totally viral.
And a couple of scenes from it have stood out as highlights, one of which is Benjamin Netanyahu admitting to funding Hamas with literal suitcases full of cash and the purpose behind his willingness to do so.
So I want to try to really lay out what all of this means.
We'll go first to that clip, clip number eight here.
Netyahu funded Hamas with millions a month from Qatar, suitcases filled with U.S. dollars delivered every single month because they wanted Hamas, the violent party in Gaza, to run things, so they had an excuse to attack him.
Let's watch.
unidentified
The public blames Netanyahu for October 7th as the one who fed the beast.
He did not create Hamas, but he fed it.
Netanyahu, who is against peace and who is against having a Palestinian state, dealt with Hamas for a long time as a strategic friend.
He says this is confidential and can't be leaked, right?
We have neighbors here, sworn enemies.
This is Bibi Netanyahu speaking.
I'm constantly passing them messages.
I confuse them, mislead them, lie to them, and then hit them over their heads.
unidentified
It was important for him to keep Gaza under the control of Hamas and keeping the Westbank under the control of Fateh and preventing them from being united in any way.
In order to do so, Netanyahu was all the time helping Hamas to survive.
At the same time that he was under investigation, he arranged for Hamas to receive $35 million every month from Qatar.
Netanyahu can't give the money by himself.
Israel will not give money to the Hamas.
You cannot even transfer this money through banks because even the banks don't want to cooperate.
So you, the Israeli prime minister, needs to beg this small and very rich country, Qatar, to give money to our enemy.
These suitcases of money was given to Hamas under the request of Benjamin Netanyahu personally.
And because the Qatarians knew him from the beginning, they were asking him to send them his requests in writing because they knew that he's going to lie in the future.
He allowed more than one billion to be transferred to the hands of the Hamas because he believed that he can control the level of hatred.
So Israel drove suitcases, stuffed with cash into Gaza to keep Hamas in power.
And again, they explain the reasoning there.
So all of the claims from all of the Israeli firsters, all of the traitors like Laura Loomer and Mark Levin, all these people, Tucker Katarlson, it's all pure, unadulterated, 100% 200-proof projection.
They are in bed with Qataris.
They are the ones funding Hamas.
They are the only reason Hamas is in power at all on purpose because they want an enemy to go to war with.
All right, so the very existence of Hamas, their power in the Gaza Strip, their ability to have anything is all funded directly by American taxpayers who pay everything that Israel has.
It all comes from us.
They send it to Qatar, who sends it to Gaza to keep the terrorists in power.
Okay, that's just how it works.
Take it up with reality if you disagree.
But we can take it a step further than that because not only was Hamas allowed to operate, funded by the Israelis, I mean, $35 million a month?
That buys a hell of a lot of weapons.
That buys a hell of a lot of, I don't know, cooperation from people around.
Could probably be spent on bribes for foreign states.
I mean, it's strategically incomprehensible if you don't understand that it's all designed to set up Gaza to eventually receive the fate it has now experienced.
If you had any legitimate concern about Hamas at all, you wouldn't give him a dollar.
This should be obvious.
I shouldn't have to explain this.
But it goes way, way deeper than that.
So we can go to the video I just put in.
This is from an official hearing in the Israeli Knesset with a soldier who was there on the front line on the Gaza border with Israel on October 7th, revealing that there was a stand down order for several hours directly telling, before the attack even began, telling the Gaza patrols to stand down and allowing the attack to take place.
Let's watch.
So he says, 6.30 in the morning, October 7th, you're at the outpost.
He's being asked.
And he responds, well, for us, October 7th starts before 6.30.
That was when the attack started.
I was a soldier in the mortar platoon of the Golani's Brigade, 13th Battalion.
And that night, myself, Yotar Surer, my sergeant, Tamar bin Yehuda, may he rest in peace, the three of us were pulling an all-nighter.
On Sabbaths and holidays, we'd let ourselves pull an all-nighter until dawn, stand two.
And you know, we were in the mortar platoon, have time to sleep until the next stand two.
So at 5.20 a.m., we're sitting by the radio so as not to wake up the radio operator and my deputy commander, battalion commander, Nir Boinfeld, who was also seriously injured, and thank God he survived, suddenly gets on the radio with a strange message.
All stations, I don't know why, I don't know how, something along those lines, no patrols on the fence until 9 a.m.
And what time was this?
5.20 in the morning.
And here's the recording of the audio.
All stations are to hold their positions.
So in terms of ground forces in Orev, we don't have anything significant.
The brigade issued a directive to our forces pending a situational assessment until 9 a.m.
No vehicles to approach Burma.
I'll say again, until 9 in the morning pending the situation assessment, no vehicles to go down to Burma.
We're in rear staging areas, a brigade-level arrangement.
I don't know exactly why.
I don't ask too many questions.
That's the directive.
That's what we do.
This is before the attack began.
So a little before it all begins.
And Tomer gives us a look like what?
And you know, we're simple soldiers, just combatants.
No commanders or officers who can ask questions.
It's an order from the deputy battalion commander.
We take the order and don't ask questions, a routine passing of an order.
And sure enough, an hour later at 6.30, suddenly, sirens.
Yuri, I'll tell you the truth.
I've been living with this since October 7th, dissimilar on TV, and I was afraid to talk about it.
And when I got to the Knesset, it was after a period when I asked some of the officers what really happened there, who were there.
And there were some who initially told me, listen, there was a sniper threat from Nookboat.
We didn't want to send soldiers so they wouldn't get hit.
And then over time, it kind of dawned on me.
I said, wait, if there's a sniper threat, how can it be that I, who am only 200 meters from the fence, don't know there's a threat?
How can it be my friends are fighting without a vest in their underwear and socks, and nobody knows that something is happening?
We're only 200, 300 meters from the fence.
And that was when my mind began, and really I was suddenly invited to the Knesset.
I felt this was a real opportunity to open this subject and talk about it to actually understand what happened there.
And look, like you're saying, to a lot of people, it sounds strange.
And actually what happened there, and we're going to go back to this again, and I'll be honest, Hila, we, I've been living with some kind of hole in my brain since October 7th.
There's something in my heart that feels to me that, listen, I don't know what there was.
I don't know what happened.
I don't want to understand what happened like everyone.
Look, the deputy battalion commander wasn't a sniper threat because the deputy battalion commander says I have no idea why and not why.
And a sniper threat, there's many times.
He says this in real time.
At 5.20 in the morning, it's not like someone told him to say that.
He received an order without an explanation.
And it's right.
So we as soldiers, he says, when we hear this thing, then we, of course, follow orders.
It did sound a little strange to us, but soldiers in the field, and we've been on this line for almost half a year, and a few losses here or there.
You know, a loss from October 7th, there are cool losses, yes, breaches of order.
Right, from breaches of order to a situation to events like those of October 7th, we're talking about here, you know, something that's surreal, something very extreme.
Anyway, we can take it down.
You get it.
You understand it.
There was a stand down order an hour before the attack began that you just heard the recording of, saying, I don't know why, but you got to stand down till 9 a.m.
Later, they go back and say, well, here's a good reason why we did that.
Maybe there was a sniper.
And it's like, okay, but I was right there.
There was no sniper.
They didn't say there was a sniper.
Didn't make any sense because there were people out there with no vests on.
Wouldn't you tell them there was a sniper if that was the case?
So that's a lie.
There was no sniper.
They told them to stand down because they knew the attack was coming.
And by the way, you know, the most sort of gruesome images of the attack happened at the Nova Music Festival, which wasn't supposed to be there and was without explanation relocated days before the festival was supposed to happen.
They decided, again, with no reason, no, you know, justification, to move that festival to a place directly in between two military installments, knowing that those two military installments were going to be attacked and that by necessity, the Hamas siege would inevitably run right into the Nova Music Festival.
So yeah, this was all planned.
It was all an operation.
It was all an op, a false flag.
And there's more to it than that.
Of course, Egypt warned Israel days before Hamas struck, according to a U.S. committee chairman.
And actually, one of Netanyahu's lieutenants is having beef with him and just came out with an article and said, release the audio from the Egyptians.
That will ruin Netanyahu.
So apparently there's also recordings out there somewhere of the Egyptians telling Benjamin Netyahu exactly what was about to happen on October 7th, proving that he knew exactly what was going on, which makes the stand down order beyond inexplicable, right?
It would be inexplicable if there really was no foreknowledge, then why the hell would you tell people to stand down?
But you do have foreknowledge and you still tell people to stand down.
I mean, the standdown order in and of itself is evidence, I think, of stand down order, but you could still claim it was just something coincidental, but not if you actually have the facts on the ground.
But then it goes a step beyond.
So Netanyahu funds Hamas.
They receive signals and are aware that this attack is coming.
They deliberately tell the soldiers to stand down so the patrols aren't there when the fence first gets broken through.
Then there's an additional stand down order of six hours while the pillaging goes on that nobody is going to confront them.
Then when the Israeli army does show up, it enacts the Hannibal Directive in which the Israeli army kills most of the people that died on October 7th.
We can go to the Ben Swan production about this.
We won't watch the whole thing, but the first few minutes, clip number nine, never forget, on October 7th, Israeli military admitted to killing many of their own people.
Images and videos of burnt cars, blacked and charred bodies, and incinerated homes in southern Israel were plastered on every phone screen and television after the October 7th Hamas attacks.
The images and videos were used by the Israeli government to justify the military's heavy-handed tactics in their ongoing war against Hamas.
But were they actually the result of the Hamas attack?
Surely Israeli civilians were brutally killed by Hamas on October 7th, but there's mounting evidence that we think any responsible journalist needs to examine.
Let's take a look at something called the Hannibal Directive.
I'm investigative journalist Ben Swan, and this is Reckoning Israel and Gaza.
So far in this investigative series, we have discussed how Israel had received concrete and credible intelligence from foreign intelligence agencies, their own military, and even Israeli citizens about where and when the October 7th Hamas attacks would take place.
The military rammed through the approval of the Nova Music Festival at the last minute, despite pushback from people within the army, and even threatened legal action against soldiers who tried warning and preparing for the Hamas attack.
And when the attack began, what did the military do?
Well, nothing.
Evidence we've uncovered points to there being some type of military stand down at the beginning of the attack.
But we need to take a look at another crucial aspect of that day.
When the IDF began to finally use their firepower and military to engage Hamas in southern Israel, did they exclusively target enemy militants?
Well, evidence actually points to no.
To understand what the Israeli military did to their own civilians on October 7th, you have to understand the political aspirations of Hamas and what the goal of taking hostages is.
Political leverage.
There are over 10,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails, 3,000 of whom have not been to trial or charged with a crime.
When militant groups manage to capture Israeli civilians or soldiers, it gives them leverage to force a prisoner swap and to get some of their people out of Israeli prison.
For example, in 1986, Hamas managed to kidnap three Israeli soldiers and bring them into Gaza.
They demanded 1,150 Palestinian prisoners in return for those three soldiers.
Well, after this, the military drafted a secret field order to prevent future kidnappings.
It was called the Hannibal Directive.
The directive gets its name from the Carthinian general who chose to poison himself rather than allow himself to be captured alive by the Romans.
Back in 2003, again, strangely enough, October 7th, 2003, three Israeli soldiers were taken hostage and brought into Lebanon.
Following the activation of the Hannibal Directive, IDF attack helicopters fired indiscriminately on 26 vehicles, thus ensuring the death of their own soldiers and therefore robbing Lebanese militants of the ability to demand Israel make concessions.
The last known application of the Hannibal Directive was 2014 in Rafah.
Hamas fighters managed to capture an Israeli soldier, Lieutenant Haydar Golden.
Instead of allowing the lieutenant to be used as leverage by Hamas though, the military killed him, dropping bombs, missiles, and shells on the area he was being held, killing that soldier and also 100 Palestinian civilians.
The scale of the Hannibal Directive on October 7th was entirely different though from those of the past.
A retired Israeli Air Force general, Naf Arez, described it during a podcast with Horetz, an Israeli newspaper, saying this, quote, the Hannibal Directive was apparently applied at a certain stage because at the moment they understand there is a kidnapping, they immediately say, guys, this is a Hannibal.
But the Hannibal we trained for all of the last 20 years is for a vehicle we know at what point the fence it enters, on what side it drives, maybe even on which road it drives.
This was a mass Hannibal.
Now think about that term, a mass Hannibal.
We all know the Hannibal Directive means to kill your own.
So what does mass Hannibal mean?
Well, if you look at Israeli media, you're going to find some pretty interesting things.
Let's read this quote directly from Windat, a large mainstream Israeli media outlet.
Quote, in the week after Black Shabbat, October 7th, soldiers of elite units at the initiative of the Southern Command checked about 70 vehicles that remained in the area between the Otaf settlements and the Gaza Strip.
These are vehicles that did not reach Gaza because on the way there, they were shot by a combat helicopter, an anti-tank missile or tank, and at least in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed.
End quote.
70 vehicles.
And in some cases, everyone in the vehicle was killed.
These are Israelis killed by Israel.
Again, only reported on in Israeli media.
Here in the U.S., we keep seeing pictures repeatedly of cars burnt to a crisp as evidence of Hamas's barbarism.
But was it Hamas's AK-47s and homemade rockets that burnt all these cars to a crisp?
Or perhaps hellfire and anti-tank missiles?
Tuvala Skapia is a member of the security team for the Kibbutz Bereri.
He set up a hotline so kibbutz residents could communicate with the Israeli army.
He told Harretz that, quote, the commanders in the field made difficult decisions, including shelling houses on their occupants in order to eliminate.
Ben Swan does a fantastic and thorough job of breaking this down.
Vigilant News has it, episode four, What is the Hannibal Directive reckoning Israel in Gaza?
So, Netanyahu funds Hamas.
They issue standdown orders before the attack begins.
They move the Nova Music Festival into position before the attack begins.
Once the attack begins, even though they had foreknowledge of it, they do nothing to respond for six hours.
That's the second standdown order.
Then, when they do respond, they kill a bunch of their own people to maximize the death count and get the impetus for the planned war in Gaza.
All of this was planned long, long before any of it came to fruition.
And then, on top of that, they come up with a couple of really ridiculous lies that are immediately disproven, but nevertheless, still find themselves cropping up in discussions about this, including the 40 beheaded babies put in ovens and the mass rape gangs.
None of that ever happened.
There's been no proof for it.
It's actually all been thoroughly discredited, those claims.
I mean, we've heard from people in the kibbutzes, hostages that were recovered, saying, yeah, it was the Israeli government that was firing at us.
It was the Israeli government that tried to kill us.
Okay, so none of this is speculation.
All of this is confirmed from official sources.
This is not complicated.
So what is it all for?
What is it all about?
It was all in service of what's happening right now.
The Iran war, the overthrow of Bashir al-Assad in Syria, and the takeover of Lebanon, just like they did under Gaza.
We can go now to clip number 27.
This is Benjamin Nanyahu admitting what I've been trying to tell you for the last two years, that all of this is in service of building up Israel to be a competitor with America and a superpower in its own right.
Here's Nanyahu saying exactly that.
unidentified
And this is the guarantee for our future.
We are working on transforming Israel into a super nation in the region and globally.
And we were able to do so thanks to our soldiers and our captains and all those who fought and those who died.
And of course, thanks to your solidarity and your steadfastness.
So there's Nanyahu saying that Israel will become a superpower and thanking all of us idiotic Western countries for doing the heavy lifting for them, for granting this to them, for gifting this to them on a silver platter made out of our own, you know, sweatblood piles of cash that they then send to Hamas.
All of this is on purpose.
Put yourself in the position of Benjamin Nanyahu November, or rather August 2023, right?
You're about to be brought up on corruption charges that they've got you dead to rights and you're going down.
But you believe you have this messianic belief that you are this all-important figure that will bring about the Antichrist.
And your goal to achieve this is to create the Greater Israel Project, but you can't just do that.
I mean, you've seen the way that, despite the hypocrisy incumbent and all of it, you've seen the way that Russia was demonized for simply trying to defend themselves against the encroachment of NATO.
You can't just go in and try to take land.
I mean, they could because they're Israel and the laws don't apply to them and everything gets inverted when it's Israel and not another country doing it.
So, you know, but you got to have a reason.
You got to have an excuse.
You don't have an excuse, but your plan is to destroy and annex Gaza, destroy and annex the West Bank, destroy and annex large portions of Lebanon, take out Syria, take out Iran, leave them either as puppets under your control or simply as chaotic battlefields that you'll get around to eventually once you're done Judaizing the places that you're annexing right now.
You can't just go do this.
You have to have an excuse.
So you create October 7th.
You do the Hannibal Directive.
You maximize the pain that Israel is feeling.
And so you have this very, you know, anxious, like disturbed, concerned, fearful populace that is just like, okay, just do it.
Just protect us, whatever you can do, because they've been, you know, mass traumatized by your operation.
Of course, they don't know or they're lying about it being your operation.
And so they either are tricked into or are just, you know, lying along with you and pretending to be scared of Gaza and saying, oh my God, we can't wait.
We can't think about it.
We can't debate whether or not we should bomb the hospital.
I'm going to get back a little bit into what's going on.
In the Middle East, you've got pogroms happening against Christians in Syria while their leader shakes hands and meets with European leaders in 10 Downing Street.
Because all of this is, I mean, the people in power just don't actually believe anything.
I hope that's been established now.
So ridiculous.
But this occurred just before the show began.
I haven't actually watched it yet, but apparently James O'Keefe was just served a restraining order at his West Palm Beach headquarters while live on air.
So let's go to this.
Clip number four here.
This is James O'Keefe, who's been leading this charge he calls the Justice League, where a whole bunch of independent reporters are going and investigating and capturing like red-handed, guilty footage of people handing out money for signatures.
So, I mean, literally off the top of my head, I could probably name like at least 10 things that James O'Keefe has uncovered that are like truly criminal conspiracies.
I mean, what he's covering right now in California, absolutely criminal, beyond any speculation or anything.
Palm Beach Sheriff County Department just served me with a domestic violence restraining order from Matthew Tiermond, the former board member from Project Veritas, who says he wants to murder me.
Despite attempting multiple times on admitting multiple times on Hidden Camera he wants me dead, Matthew Tiermond filed a restraining order against me in Miami-Dade County, saying things such as, quote, I would kill him, O'Keefe, because he's one of the most evil people I've ever known.
Even shot up my book with rifle bullets through my heart on the cover.
The Audacity of Evil Has No Bounds.
Yeah, I mean, if that's not a warning bell for all real patriots, I don't know what is.
The man has uncovered hundreds of criminal conspiracies, and not one of the people he's exposed has ever paid a price for it.
Welcome back, folks.
So something strange happened today.
And I think, I think it might just be something we like to call magic fairy dust.
I think there's magic fairy dust in the world.
I think that there's been a, I don't know, some sort of spell cast.
I don't know.
A fairy godmother is at work.
Perhaps some, you know, cute little animal helpers cropped up.
Something has happened to Lindsey Graham, the princess, our princess Lindsey Graham, has transformed at midnight back into a pumpkin, I guess.
I don't know.
It's got to be something.
And all we know about Lindsey Graham is that he spent the last couple days suspiciously wandering around Disney World with a fairy scepter, doing God knows what.
Doesn't have kids, doesn't have friends or a wife.
So I guess just buy him just solo Disney World trip with the fairy scepter in tow.
And something happened in this time.
We don't know if Tinkerbell sprinkled something on his nose.
There could have been some sort of wishing upon a star situation.
You know, we're really, we're open to all suggestions, but something has happened here where Lindsey Graham has transformed from Neocon back into a patriot.
Again, if we have better suggestions, I'd love to hear from them.
We've been reaching out to Jiminy Cricket.
Refuses to come on, but we're really, we're trying to get to the bottom of this.
Okay, we don't maybe had a long in-depth talk with Minnie Mouse.
Could be Mickey and Minnie sitting there like, you're not supposed to kill children, Lindsey.
He's like, Thanks for telling me, you guys.
You've really opened up my eyes.
I don't know.
We don't know what it is, but something magical has occurred at the Magic Kingdom and has transformed Lindsey Graham into somebody with the bare minimum amount of patriotism to recognize that Iran and war with Iran is not actually in our best interest.
Quote, wind down Iran war, wind up efforts for peace deal, says Senator Lindsey Graham, of all people.
There's a couple options here.
One of them is magical intervention.
Okay, we're not discounting that.
I just would think there would be signs of some sort.
Lindsey Graham, we haven't seen him in a dress.
I'm not saying he doesn't wear one.
I've never seen him with glass slippers.
But it's possible.
So that's one option.
The other option is that he finally took a look at the polls from his home state of South Carolina and realized that being a despicable, closeted homosexual warmongering freak is not exactly the most electable thing.
Oh, yeah.
Then he, then yesterday he posts a picture of a shotgun.
Yesterday spent some, I'm sorry, yesterday spent some time breaking clays in Edgefield County today.
Does it get much better than that?
Like, I thought you were at Disney World.
Are you shooting Disney characters?
Is Lindsey Graham hunting the Disney characters?
Is that what's happening here?
I mean, just the most transparent cover-up I've ever seen.
Lindsey, they've got pictures of you with the gay scepter at Disney World all by yourself.
He's like, quick, go in the archives and find me it, find a picture of me looking manly.
Okay, so these are the, yeah, that's more like it.
These are the options.
Either Lindsey Graham's fairy godmother has finally smacked him with a wand and shaken his brain loose and he understands that war with Iran is stupid in every possible way.
Or he's looked at the internal polling and realized that his career is over if he doesn't change literally everything about himself from the bottom up.
Or this is literally all according to plan.
And now that they have gotten what they wanted out of Trump, the ridiculous, completely ill-advised, and at this point, thoroughly disastrous war in Iran.
And now they're throwing him under the bus.
And they're going to say, well, I said we should have peace.
I mean, a month into it, I said, Trump, time to throw in the towel, brother.
There's a lot of words I can't say right now.
Lindsey Graham said Monday he's encouraged President Trump to wind down the war in Iran, wind up efforts for peace, while noting that it would take an agreement from both parties to resolve conflict in the Middle East.
Yeah, that's true.
Good point.
Keep it up, Mr. President.
Wind down the war and wind up efforts for a historic peace deal, Graham said on a post on social media platform X.
It works for Lindsey.
Should I just do the whole show?
I mean, is this how I should talk?
It works for him.
I don't know what it is.
He's touting serious discussions in what Trump described as a new and reasonable regime in Iran.
Graham has come under criticism for public comments that seem to suggest support for using ground troops in Iran.
Yeah, it seems to suggest that.
When he's like, we need ground troops in Iran.
It's like, yeah, it seems like he wants ground troops in Iran.
I'm picking up a signal here.
Quote, Washington's war machine is hard at work.
They're trying to drag us into Iran to make it another Iraq.
We can't let them, said Representative Nancy Mace in a post on X last week.
And yes, when we say Washington's war machine, we mean Lindsey Graham, she said.
Graham continued to support military action in his remarks on X, but leaned towards finding a diplomatic solution.
I support diplomatic efforts to end the conflict consistent with our military objectives, but it takes two to tango.
You would know.
The necessity for military action is weeks, not months.
And Operation Epic Fury is well ahead of pace, he wrote on X.
Okay, so something strange is happening.
Something mystical and magical and curious is unfolding before us as anybody calling Lindsey Graham a pannikin?
Is anybody claiming that he is an anti-Semite that wants to kill all the Jews?
No?
So he's allowed to oppose the war in Iran.
Okay.
So he's only allowed to oppose the war in Iran after it's at a point to which there is no return.
I'm sensing a pattern here with a bunch of people.
You know, yesterday, there was an interview with Larry Fink where he came out against DEI and ESG, the very things that he and his organization invented in the first place and then imposed on everybody using their monopolistic control of the American financial market.
Now he's against it.
Now he's opposed to it.
You know what that means?
That means they've run the numbers, they've run the algorithms, they've fed it into the simulation machine and AI, and they've determined it's too late for us to do anything about it.
So now they can come out against it.
Now that the damage that they've done is irreversible, they can pretend to be the champions against the very thing that they attacked us with.
I'm sensing a similarity with old Lindsey Graham.
Now that you believed Lindsey Graham, now that you listened to him and did what he wanted and got us into trouble from which there is seemingly no escape, now he's going to come out and say, actually, this was a bad idea all along.
Is anybody else sick of this?
Senator Lindsey Graham, I'm going back to South Carolina asking them to send their sons and daughters over to the Mideast.
Yeah, how'd that work out for you, Princess?
How'd that work out for you, Lady Graham?
Oil slides, as Trump reportedly told AIDS he's willing to end the war without reopening Hormuz.
Again, I mean, I cannot explain what a ridiculous failure this is.
It's almost funny to me arguing with people on X that are still supporting this war.
Lindsey Graham doesn't even support the war anymore.
President Trump doesn't even support the war anymore.
We are now one month and a few days into this war, and it's already a disaster for which our best possible scenario, our best case scenario at this point, is returning, is not even returning to status quo, not even getting back to a pre-war situation so we can just, you know, write off this whole war like, okay, it costs us billions of dollars.
People died, right?
Families have been shattered.
Money's been just spent with abandon.
I mean, there's already been a bad stuff, but hey, we're just going right back to normal.
Like, if that was the case, it would already be a ridiculous disaster.
We're not even trying to get the Straits of Hormuz open anymore, apparently.
So now, according to the people in power, the best case scenario is we get back to a position that we were before the war, only significantly impoverished and not having control of the strait of Hormuz, significantly weakened in every possible way.
We're only a month in.
Already feel like demanding apologies from everybody that got us into this because it's already been shown that there is no positive outcome even possible from the people in power.
So, what do we, so where do we go from here?
Because it seems to me like all of these things need to be just sort of added to the list.
Now, we're lucky because it's all the same people doing this.
Like all of these different things.
Otherwise, the list would be just inconceivably huge, but it's not that big.
It's, you know, a certain amount of people.
Because when Larry Fink comes out and admits ESG or DEI wasn't the best thing to do, he's not talking about some sort of like Chick-fil-A unveiled a new coupon that wasn't that popular.
It's not like this is just like some small thing that they're like, hey, let's try this out over here and it didn't work.
Okay, never mind.
We're calling that off.
They deliberately reorganized our entire society.
They deliberately excluded an entire generation, specifically of white men, but of white people overall, from the power structure.
The effects of that have been devastating to a degree that we can't even calculate and is only going to get worse as we move forward.
Okay, so I don't think we need to move on from this.
I think we need to charge these people with crimes against humanity because they knew exactly what they were doing.
That's sort of the theme of everything that we're talking about today, isn't it?
That all of this stuff is deliberate, that all of these outcomes were imminently predictable, if not manufactured on purpose for this exact outcome.
We sit now on the cusp of a new new world order where Israel is an absolute superpower.
America has had our ability to project power thoroughly diminished.
We've been humiliated on the world stage.
China is rising.
Iran is now proven that they can stand on their own.
And if they are entering talks, which the president of Iran is talking about possibly entering talks, but they say like, but we need guarantees that we won't be attacked in the future.
Well, who's going to trust guarantees from Israel or America?
Those guarantees mean nothing.
Literally, while you're negotiating the guarantees, it's likely they'll bomb you to death.
So it's like the guarantees that they won't be attacked anymore is an eradication of Israel and America's ability to attack them uncontested.
So I'll say again, the purpose of Israel's war against Iran is to leave it in a state like Syria in a condition that the state of Syria is in, in which they can bomb them whenever they want for whatever reason they want, and that the country they're bombing has no ability to respond.
That's the ideal condition for Israel, is that Iran is just a fractured mess, a chaotic hell world of interminable conflict between ethnic factions that Israel can occasionally come in, bomb some infrastructure.
They call it mowing the lawn, right?
That's what they want in Iran.
It's what they want in the Middle East.
It's what they want really around the entire world.
Just they have to start with their immediate neighbors, but they'll expand.
That's the purpose of all of this.
So again, whether it's the war in Iran and the lockdowns that are coming as a consequence, or the standdown orders that led to the attack on October 7th, that led to the invasion of Gaza, that led to Hezbollah getting involved, that led to the invasion of Lebanon.
These things are all planned for.
And you know that's the case because literally on October 9th, I hosted the Alex Jones show and laid all of this out for you and said very specifically how this would inevitably lead to a greater conflict with Iran and that Israel would necessitate American boots on the ground to achieve their goals in Iran.
And we see the push towards that forever.
So it's not enough to allow these people to pretend like they've had a change of heart and are now on the side of right.
They got us into this mess on purpose, deliberately, and only were able to do so by silencing those of us or trying to discredit those of us who are warning against it the entire time.
So again, it's like, I don't know what it's like to be one of you jackasses that's just wrong about everything all of the time.
But I literally have people in my comments that were wrong about COVID, wrong about lockdowns, wrong about the 2020 election, wrong about January 6th, just wrong about everything, and then condescending to me about, you know, we're going to take their oil, right?
Andrew Meyer, smart dude, typically against war, is in this delusional belief that somehow this is all part of the plan.
We're going to take Iran's oil and China's going to suffer because of it.
It's just like, where are you getting this, dude?
So I don't understand what's going on in these people's minds, but I'm going to keep just like trusting in reality and just saying the truth and just being right about literally everything all the time.
No, the friend of, or the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
And now they're doing a great service for all of us by bombing big tech tech infrastructure to smithereens.
At least we hope that they'll follow through with this threat.
Iran vows to strike U.S. tech firms in Middle East.
And basically they're saying, look, if you're Amazon or Microsoft or Oracle or Palantir and you're helping to target us, then we're going to destroy your infrastructure.
And I got to wonder how they're going to deal with this because, I mean, so much stuff is on the cloud now.
I'm not totally sure of how backups work in this regard.
But if Iran destroys a server farm for Amazon, does everybody lose their information?
Like, is that even recoverable?
Like, we have this idea that you put someone on a cloud, it just goes into this sort of permanent infrastructure somewhere.
It's out there somewhere, right?
Because there is no such thing as a cloud.
It's just somebody else's computer.
So what happens if you worked with Amazon for a long time, your entire business is built on their server system?
Can that be eradicated by Iran?
And if that's the case, what does Amazon do about that?
How are they ever like trusted ever again?
Like maybe we need to have a like major separation between companies that service customers and countries that are working as the operating system for the tyrannical genocide campaign of the Epstein class.
Like maybe you can do one or you can do the other, but maybe it's a little bit dangerous to cross-pollinate the two.
Now, luckily, you know, Iran, unlike us, right?
We're out there bombing.
I think we've bombed like 60 schools at this point, a bunch of libraries.
We've bombed the university in Tehran.
We just, you know, are bombing civilians as a matter of course in our terror campaign.
Iran has had the courtesy to warn people.
So, you know, hopefully the employees will be able to get out.
I don't want people to die just because they work for Oracle or whatever.
But I would be happy to see their infrastructure eradicated, personally.
Am I the crazy one?
I mean, they are literally building a cage around us.
They're building a digital panopticon to enslave us.
And I don't know.
It seems like at a certain point, it might get to the point where, you know, kind of like the blade runners in the UK, the gents that go around and take down cameras and the ULES ultra-low emission zone surveillance equipment.
Like they just go and just physically tear down the infrastructure needed to impose tyranny.
Like we could get to that point here in America, which also should go into the planning for the powers that be, because they're pouring trillions of dollars into building databases, gigantic databases, bigger than you can possibly conceive of.
The one in Ohio requires enough, the equivalent power of nine nuclear power plants to run.
And it's like, that's all fine and good for like enslaving people in this digital existence that they want to create for us.
But like, what happens when there's like a dude with bolt cutters who can shut your whole thing down?
Like, what happens when like a little bit of like thermite and bolt cutters are enough to utterly destroy your entire system?
I mean, you can't harden these places really to any sufficient degree.
I know they're trying to like build some under mountains and stuff.
And yeah, I think that's to protect it from us because it's the infrastructure and the physical components of the global slave system.
So, hell, if Iran could just take him out from the air, that would save us a lot of trouble.
This is the point we're getting to, by the way.
And there's nothing really worth preserving anymore that I can look at.
And I can, you know, see too.
I mean, everything is just getting significantly worse faster.
So there's got to be a break at some point.
There's got to be a diversion, a reflection of the trend.
And we'll see when and how that comes.
But I think it's overdue.
I think it's long overdue.
And I am in favor of not voting for Republicans because obviously they're just the worst.
They're actually worse than the liberals somehow.
It's weird, but that seems to be the truth.
However, the idea of accelerationism is historically completely retarded.
Sorry to use the word, but that's the case.
All you have to do is look at countries where this has happened.
Just look at South Africa.
People have this idea that's like, well, maybe we just make everything worse.
That'll force people to rise up.
No, absolutely not.
Look at South Africa.
There are still liberal progressives in South Africa, a place where over half the population is entirely dependent on welfare, in which some vanishingly small minority of white people pay all of the taxes that support everybody else.
They're still in a state of absolute collapse, South Africa.
I can show you videos from today of people just going around knocking down streetlights to steal the copper out of a phenomenon that we're seeing crop up here in America increasing with increasing regularity.
There's still an immigration problem into South Africa.
There are still people from other countries going to South Africa because it hasn't all been looted yet.
So the idea that like accelerationism will somehow lead to a, you know, sudden creation of, I don't know, it just doesn't make any sense.
It doesn't make any sense.
So I'm not, I'm not one of these people that's like, we have to vote for Democrats because then people realize how bad they are.
No, like that's that's stupid.
I just think voting for Republicans and expecting anything different is even stupider.
And I think maybe, just maybe, if we stop the Iran war and put all of our effort and energy into creating a third party or actually genuinely taking over the reins of power from the Republican Party, but I think that's kind of a dead end operation.
I think we need Joe Kent, Marjorie Taylor Greene, teaming up with Anna Kasperian and Roe Khanna.
I think we need to bridge the gap between these two sides, recognize that both sides are serving the same interests at the end of the day, and that we can break free from this.
So hell, if we have to give up 2028 to truly, thoroughly, and once for all destroy the Republican Party in order to create something new and better, then that's fine.
I'm open to taking extraordinary steps while there are still some remnant of people that believe in our founding principles that can take power once the dust is settled.
Honor Crew just brought in a bunch of sheets about Dan Bongino and Thomas Massey having a back and forth.
Should we go, is it worth it to go over this?
I mean, do I have to?
Like, does anybody have to read this?
Can we do some fortune telling?
Can I guess Dan Bongino is an idiot?
Thomas Massey is correct.
I mean, what do we expect to happen here?
Is Dan Bongino going to, is he going to totally expose Thomas Massey?
Do we think that's going to happen?
What do we think, class?
Am I supposed to go through this?
Is that what's supposed to happen here?
I mean, I can.
We just want to see just how right Thomas Massey is, but we'll save this.
I'll save this for a second.
But I guess it does go to sort of what we're talking about and where this goes.
This article from the New York Times, which I'm glad the New York Times is coming out with this because as ridiculous as it is, Trump at least gives a lot of credence to these old kind of establishment media outlets.
New York Times, of course, would be the premier media outlet.
And they, it's hard to express how kind of damning this article is because it's not like vitriol.
It's not like they're spewing hatred for Republicans.
They're just sort of explaining what's happening at CPAC and how everybody is disillusioned in the Republican Party.
So again, it's not even like, I don't know how to explain.
You almost have to read the whole thing, but it's just, you just get this sense of just this wet blanket over everything.
Yeah, this person goes to CPAC and it's just like everything's kind of disappointing.
It's just kind of like, nah.
You know?
He says that the first day of the conservative political action conference wound to a close, the audience inside the airplane hangar-sized ballroom had dwindled as Nick Shirley, the headline speaker, mumbled his remarks.
Mr. Shirley, a 23-year-old content creator, recently minted a right-wing celebrity, had been tapped by the content creator and recently minted, I'm sorry, tapped by the conference's organizers to bring a youthful jolt of energy to the proceedings.
But youth themselves and the conservative energy were nowhere to be seen among the rows of empty chairs as Mr. Shirley made halting reference to Theodore Roosevelt's man in the arena speech.
And again, the reason I'm saying this is not to like, you know, crap on Nick Shirley.
I think he's great.
To like celebrate the fact that there's been this deflation in the conservative movement, it's to point the finger directly directly at the people causing it, the people who are responsible for it.
The reason why it's like this is 100% because of Israel and because of the Jewish influence on the Trump administration.
That's it.
That's the reason.
You don't need to look anywhere else, folks.
It's not complicated.
It's not something you need to debate.
It's like very imminently obvious to absolutely everybody that's paying attention.
And you can say it shouldn't be that way, but it is.
So what are you going to do about it?
It's like, no, but they should be in favor of us going to war with Iran.
It's like, okay, but we're not.
So what are you going to do about it?
Are you going to try to convince us?
So far, you don't even have an argument.
So far, your only argument has been to tell us to shut up and get behind Trump because we have to, because the Democrats are worse.
I guess.
Yeah, a little bit.
But at least they don't give us false hope.
At least, I don't know.
They might actually do something we could benefit from in some way.
What are we supposed to say?
You people have destroyed this movement thoroughly and on purpose and by design.
And it's not that complicated, folks.
Pretty much everybody that joined the Trump administration in 2024, who he is now serving endlessly and rapidly, like there's no hesitation.
If they want something, they get it.
Doesn't matter if it's setting new precedent or in violation of our basic fundamental principles of free speech, anything like that.
It doesn't matter.
They get what they want.
And these people are not Republicans and never have been Republicans and do not like the Republican Party and spent their entire lives up till 2024 trying desperately to destroy not just the Republican Party, but everything we believe.
And then they join in 2024.
So like, just really imagine this.
Really imagine you go to somebody who has been voting Democrat since the 80s, just went over to Trump, and you go to that person, you go, hey, this is destroying the Republican Party.
Well, you think they're going to be like, oh, no, I don't care.
They've been working their whole lives to destroy the Republican Party.
They just hadn't figured out the most effective way to do it.
Now they have.
Now they have.
Can't destroy America from the outside.
So what do you do?
You take it from the inside.
You commit it to an impossible to win war overseas over and over again until you grind it down into a stump of its former self.
How do you destroy the Republican Party?
You get elected on a mandate for mass deportations, for eliminating the woke crap and DEI, for saving trillions of dollars from the federal budget, but most importantly, the mass deportations and the arresting of criminals.
And then you take all of that effort, you take all of that victory, and you waste it all deporting college students who write papers about Palestine and then going to war with Iran.
That is the most efficient and effective way to destroy the Republican Party, possibly the only way.
And that's what they're doing.
And it's not sophisticated.
It's very blunt how they're doing it.
It's just everybody in the media is in favor of them doing this as well.
And so they're not going to report on it accurately.
They're going to report on it in a way that guarantees it continues.
But I mean, this whole article is extremely accurate, extremely accurate, and extremely Kind of depressing, but it more just shows the disconnect and the collapse and the way that the Republicans really are kind of living in a fantasy world in exactly the same way that the left was living in a fantasy world under Kamala Harris.
And of course, the comparison between last year and this year is possibly the most illustrative part of it.
Last year's meeting struck a triumphant tone as Elon Musk cranked a chrome chainsaw on stage and President Trump gleefully recounted the tale of his political comeback.
But for the past several years, a younger crowd has declared the event passe.
That's funny, for the past several years, but last year it was good.
But last year, the energy was high.
Elon Musk, Donald Trump, everybody was there and promising to get things done.
We had just won this incredible, impossible victory, and the world was ours.
We had the Congress.
We had the Senate.
We had the Supreme Court and the presidency.
Literally a full house where we could do anything that we wanted.
And absolutely all of it was sacrificed on the altar of Israel.
All of it.
Tell me I'm wrong.
Point to something that Trump has succeeded in.
And you can make excuses.
You can pretend to believe their reasoning.
It only ever goes one way.
The mass deportations were far more popular than the Iran war is.
They had no problem with that.
Somehow, when it's mass deportations that have a 80% approval rate, can't get it done.
It's too politically hot.
They can't touch it.
We got to scale back.
Too many bad headlines.
But then when it's war with Iran, which has like an 11% approval rating, we're doing it.
We do it.
It doesn't matter.
All the backlash, all the anger, it's all manageable.
It's fine.
It's stupid.
They're all stupid.
We just don't have to listen to them.
Do you understand that if we wanted to do any of this stuff?
I mean, going back to Harvard is like the best example for me.
Where it's like you would, even after they forced the resignation of the president of Harvard because she refused to crack down on the free speech of her students and they came up with different reasons to claim it was about DEI or she plagiarized something.
Obviously all nonsense.
And it's like for 10 years, Harvard is teaching classes about how to eradicate whiteness, the evil incumbent in white skin, right, taught by Jewish professors.
We point this out.
We're outraged by this.
Hey, look, how are you having the premier university in America teaching things that are just, I mean, it's straight out of a, you know, inverted version of, you know, Jim Crow literature.
Like, what are we doing here?
And we're told, like, well, what should we do?
What could we possibly do?
It's Harvard.
It's just, they get to teach whatever they want.
We can't do anything.
The government certainly can't interfere.
We have a sacred obligation to uphold free speech.
And glorious Harvard gets to use that however they want.
It's like, oh, but Harvard's supporting Palestinians.
And it's like, then we have to get rid of their endowment.
Then we withhold billions of dollars and force the change that we want.
We demand that the president step down.
And if they don't, then we contact all of the donators to Harvard and we have them withdraw support and we bankrupt them or they do what we say.
They fire the people that we don't like.
They replace them with people that we do like or we destroy their institution.
And it's like, so you could have done this at any point.
So, at any point, you had perfectly available there for your, you know, within reach, all the levers you could possibly need to bring about a change that would actually benefit not just white people that are being viciously discriminated against, not just in the class, but, you know, in the matriculation as well.
Can't do it.
Refuse to do it.
Won't even broach it.
You act stupid.
You act ignorant.
How could we possibly?
But then the instant that it looks like it might have a minor, possibly detrimental effect to the war aims of Israel, then all of a sudden, all of these levers are pulled.
All of the pressure is brought to bear, and Harvard is forced to bend the knee.
That's the situation everywhere.
That's the situation with just about every topic we cover, every event we complain about.
It's like imminently solvable.
And the very people that will refuse to solve it, that will act like it's impossible to solve, will act like it's, well, we can't set precedent or we got to be careful.
If we do it to them, they'll do it to us or we're upholding sacred free speech.
They all are just liars.
They're just liars and they will immediately do absolutely anything necessary to achieve whatever they need to for Israel, no matter how tangential it is to the actual thing happening, right?
There's actually, there's no real actual threat of like Harvard hippies pitching a tent on Harvard lawn.
It doesn't actually affect anything.
It's about the symbol and it's about the total control of these institutions that has to be maintained.
It's a supremacy ideology that does not brook even the slightest deviation.
Not if they have the power to rein you in and or destroy your life for opposing them.
So I don't even want to get to that level.
I'm not, I actually oppose that because these people are tyrannical jackasses.
I don't want to do that.
I just want to illustrate to you the absurdity of the claims that, well, there's nothing we can do about this or we're trying our hardest and you review people just need to keep voting for Republicans.
It's like, show us one iota, one percentage of a percentage of the same care and effort that you show for foreigners that despise you.
And maybe we can talk.
But until you even just pretend to be on our side, why the hell would we subject ourselves to your rule willingly?
This is absurd.
It's all absurd.
And of course, the New York Times gets it.
The Democrats get it, right?
They're talking about running just like normal white guys that everybody can get behind.
We don't want any radicals out front, even though they know everybody that they're voting in votes radical.
They at least understand the perception that needs to be maintained.
After talking with other young attendees at the conference, Mr. Huffses said, most appear to be aligned with Mr. Fuentes, who's become a pariah within the conservative movement.
Now, hold on.
Let me dissect this sentence for you here.
Most appear aligned with Mr. Fuentes, who has become a pariah within the conservative movement.
How could somebody who has the support of most of the people be a pariah?
How does that work?
Is that because there's a small number of people on the top who in a top-down sort of way are saying that he's a pariah, even though he's immensely popular with all the people?
I think that's what's happening here.
I think I know who.
He's become a pariah in the conservative movement, apparently, even though he has the overwhelming support of all the people.
For, amongst other reasons, his recent declaration that young conservatives should express their displeasure with Mr. Trump's military strikes on Iran by voting for Democrats.
Quote, I'd say at least 60% of the young people here are fans of Nick, Mr. Hoffs said.
The subject of the war in Iran, a source of consternation for many young people in the crowd, was engaged with lightly on the main stage and otherwise relegated to exhibition hall gimmicks, such as gauging support for the conflicts with piles of pinto beans.
And if this was a righteous war that was going well, would that be the case?
I mean, you can just like they're basically trying to ignore the Iran war.
It's not like it was a big discussion.
It's not like it was a contentious sort of thing.
They just wanted to avoid it because they know it doesn't play well and because they know it's ridiculous and because they know any attempt for them to justify the actions that they're taking are going to be met with widespread scorn.
The videos will probably go viral and they'll be humiliated as a result.
So they'd rather just not talk about it, which is proof that they know just as well as you and I do that the Iran war is a bad thing and it's bad for the Republican Party.
I mean, if they actually thought it was a good thing, they'd be celebrating it.
They'd be talking about it constantly.
It'd be a main fixture of the conversation during CPAC.
It wasn't because it's bad in every possible way.
So all these people that got us into the war, that made the arguments in favor of the war, that called for Tucker Carlson to be killed because he's not for the war, people like Josh Hammer, allegedly, I should say.
I'm sorry, people who said he should be treated like a fox in the hen house because of his opposition to the Iran war.
You know, shot with a shotgun, I guess, would be the answer.
They didn't make the Iran war a big part of their speeches, did they?
They didn't go out there and say, you're welcome for getting you into this war.
You're welcome for supporting this American imperialism that benefits all of you great people.
They didn't bring it up because they know everybody hates it.
You'd think they're the ones that got us into the war.
They should be proud of it.
They should go out there and give speeches about what a good thing it is, how hard they work to get us into this war.
We know already.
I mean, we saw you working continuously trying to get this war.
Now you don't bring it up.
Now you don't want to talk about it.
Now you don't want to mention it.
Now you just want to call people names like a leftist.
All right.
Matt Gates, the former congressman from Florida, offered one of the loudest moments of dissent from Mr. Trump in the event's official proceedings, saying, quote, a ground invasion of Iran will make our country poorer and less safe, said Mr. Gates, who's now the host of a nightly show on the conservative One American Network.
It will mean higher gas prices, higher food prices, and I'm not sure if we would end up killing more terrorists than we would create.
That speech, though, drew a muted response from the crowd, and some remained frustrated.
These conversations are not happening here, said Samantha Cassell, a 27-year-old Republican strategist.
She was wearing a Fishback for Florida hat in support of the, quote, rage-baiting Florida candidate for governor, who's energized a coalition of young voters in that state, saying there's no serious discussion going on.
Like anybody reading this article, it's impossible to ignore the glaring problems with the GOP.
It's like, here's, we talked to a young supporter of Nick Fuentes, who's fired up and excited about Nick Fuentes and says all the young people love Nick Fuentes.
And then we watched some speeches from some old school people and the response was muted and it was all kind of like embarrassing and cringy.
And then we talked to a fishback supporter and fishback is running an amazing campaign where he's firing up people and getting hundreds of supporters in obscure locations like waffle houses.
He's holding impromptu events that draw massive crowds and make headlines across the country.
And we're keeping him out.
We're gatekeeping him with everything we've got because we don't want the youth to be excited.
We want the youth to be depressed, I guess.
And we want to demoralize them into thinking they have to support this war because so far there's no enthusiastic support.
So just demoralization to the point of helplessness.
That's what they're going for now.
Feel free to hire me as a Republican strategist, Republicans.
I have these brilliant insights like people that draw young energy are the people you should be supporting.
Okay.
$10 million, please.
Is it not obvious?
Is it not readily apparent what the problem is?
And it ain't the young people.
It ain't the young people.
It ain't the young, the youth movement.
It's not the Nick Fuentez's or James Fishbacks out there that do draw crowds, that do inspire excitement and passion.
The problem is, in fact, that everybody else at the conference sees Nick Fuentes and James Fishback as an existential threat to their continued power and are doing everything they can to silence the most popular and exciting people on the right.
Am I saying things to you that you can't figure out for yourself?
Really?
Among the young Republicans, there were cases of people expressing forms of cautious optimism about the coming midterm elections and tentative support for the president's abrupt choice to attack Iran.
But these views were expressed for the most part by attendees with professional aspirations to work in GOP circles.
Is that not tell you everything you need to know right there?
Everybody who is young, who even tentatively, they say, moderately, carefully expresses muted support for some of Trump's, what he's doing, it's all because they want jobs in the GOP power structure.
So the GOP power structure is just diametrically opposed to what the people who vote for the GOP want.
And they have, it's like this understanding that if you want to work in the GOP, if you want to move up the ranks of the Republican Party, if you want to become a person of importance in politics to do something for America, you first have to submit to Israel.
First, you have to abandon your principles, lie about what you believe.
It's like a shit test.
It's like they're testing you.
Will you lie for us?
Will you say things that you know are untrue because they serve our purpose?
And if so, you may be welcomed in the ranks of the scum.
I mean, just really think about that.
And it sucks because right-wingers just aren't deceptive by nature.
Because what could easily happen, and Fuentes is doing this to a certain degree, where there are Groypers, like everybody understands who actually support Nick Fuentes, if you actually believe in, you know, what Groupers believe or whatever, you have to hide that.
You have to disguise that.
You have to conceal that.
But like a lot of people aren't comfortable doing that.
I wouldn't be comfortable doing that.
It's like eats your soul away.
Like you would become a different person.
You did that day in, day out, having this like secret identity.
It shouldn't be necessary.
And it doesn't comport itself with the fundamental morals of the people who are expected to do this.
So it would be easy if like we were like the leftists who celebrate the fact.
It's actually sort of their official plan now.
The official Democrat plan is to go, hey, let's run people who are pretending to be reasonable, but are in fact radical communist.
That's like their official platform at this point.
So they're happy to do this.
They're fine doing this.
This is why the left always wins when it comes to, you know, you elect somebody that seems like a moderate Democrat and they turn out to be a radical.
It's because they're happy to play the false part, to deceive, to lie about their true intentions.
Republicans, right-wingers don't really want to do that.
If we did, it'd be easy to get into all these.
It'd be so easy to go up to any old boomer that runs an organization and go, I love Israel.
I love America.
You know, I just really think the Judeo-Christian foundation of our country is collapsing and we have to uphold it against the Islamo-fascist red-green align.
Like, it wouldn't be hard at all to trick these people and then get in and then operate behind the scenes.
It's just we're not morally aligned with that type of strategy.
So we refuse to do it.
And it's kind of an impossible ass to be like, hey, you're a responsible, honest, truthful Christian young man.
Well, the way you need to get power is by becoming a liar and a deceiver and an undercover operator who's betraying the people who hired you.
It's like we don't want to do that.
So we're kind of screwed unless we have actual genuine organizers, events that are willing to embrace the actual mentality of the people on the ground and not just work tirelessly to silence or eradicate them, like ostracize them completely.
So I think this is a very good article by New York Times of all places.
And it ends with a poignant, but not exactly groundbreaking conclusion.
They say, you know, CPAC's attendees yearn for some of the TPOSA energy.
But of course, TPO was taken over by Israelis.
So that's not going to last any much longer.
And the last, you know, America Fest was a complete disaster as well because they actually allowed some of the dissidents to speak.
And so it became a big argument between the power structure that wants to silence everybody and the America First people that they're trying to silence.
Miss Cassell, this young woman, quote, I think MAGA is dying.
She said, I do.
Well, good riddance.
All right, folks.
Thomas Massey held a money bomb yesterday.
Had a ton of great people contributing to it.
He's come out with a statement today.
Let's go to clip number 32 here.
This was, I believe this was during the money bomb.
This was about one of the things that the Trump administration is desperately working on.
So, okay.
So they haven't gotten any deep state actors.
They haven't gotten any justice for RussiaGate or the RussiGate cover-up or the fake impeachments into Ukraine or the corruption around Ukraine or the COVID-19 2020 lockdown scandal, you know, the vaccine poison.
None of that's been handled at all.
Obviously, the 2020 election being stolen, that hasn't been dealt with at all.
But don't worry, folks.
They're working tirelessly to make sure that the glyphosate producers can no longer be sued for the immense amounts of cancer that they're giving to everybody.
One of the things in the farm bill, I'm still trying to get out of it, was successful in getting this out of prior bills is immunity for a German company called Bayer that makes glyphosate.
This is not to grant farmers immunity.
This is to grant the corporation immunity if they give farmers, if farmers contract a form of cancer or non-Hodgson's lymphoma from this chemical.
If this makes it into the farm bill, you won't be able to sue for that.
And I know they're dealing with some similar legislation at the state level.
And of course, Thomas Massey is standing up against that.
And Thomas Massey ratioed the White House significantly with this post.
So the White House wrote this post that says only farms, onlyfarms.com.
Thomas Massey responds, can you arrest Epstein's co-conspirators instead of riffing on a porn site?
And yeah, he got about 10 times as many likes as As the White House did with not so much of the reach that they have.
I mean, you people can just pretend that you're on top.
You can pretend that you're the authorities.
You can pretend that you're the popular ones.
Nobody believes it except for you.
And so Dan Bongino goes back and forth with Massey.
Long story short, Dan Bongino was mad that Thomas Massey was blowing up the BS that the FBI was feeding us about the supposed pipe bomber and basically wanted to call Thomas Massey in to try to persuade him not to release information that would embarrass the FBI.
But the funniest part to me is just on every one of Dan Bongino's, I don't know if it just happened to pronounce this way, but all of his posts for me include the first most popular response to him.
And everyone is just calling him out hilariously.
As Thomas Massey and him go back and forth, where basically he's like, Thomas Massey is just like destroying his points one by one.
But then it's like, you know, Dan Bongino, Thomas Massey is a shameless fraud.
Thanks.
Have a nice day.
First comment from Dan Blitzerian, you're such a clown trashing Massey as confirmation of your treason.
He says something else about Thomas Massey.
The first response says the guy who talked to big game, but was completely bought by your big nose handlers as soon as you got into office from a former supporter of you.
Go F yourself.
You let everybody but Israel down.
Dan Bongino tries to get creative with it.
It's like, did Thomas Massey ever accept the invite to be briefed about the cases he's bloviating about?
No, of course he didn't.
He prefers to rage bait and litigating criminal matters on X for clout.
Ask him if you're bored.
He chose to be stupid.
Fact 100.
100 emoji.
The first response, top response to that post is: quote, it's clear that you and your handlers are in a frenzy after seeing Massey's wildly successful fundraiser yesterday.
Meanwhile, you interviewed his puppet opponent who won't even agree to a debate.
This is FAGA, which I think is kind of creative.
Fake America again?
Like fake America great again, something like that?
FAGA.
Bunch of faggots.
And finally, Dan Bongino says, P.S., another representatives who had questions took the brief, not Massey.
He prefers ignorance.
And the top response to that, quote, did the pedophiles you protect take the brief?
Did they take the brief, Dan Bongino?
The pedophile criminals that you are ruining your own reputation to protect, they take the brief.
I don't even know if I'm going to have time to take calls this hour.
I want you just sitting online waiting for me to go to you.
So we'll hold off on taking calls for a minute because I got a lot of good videos.
Got a lot of good videos.
I also need to tell you about Zeolite, Zeolite Detox and Defense, available now at the AlexJonesstore.com, the AlexJones store.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you, it is a powerful liquid formula with ultra-fine Zeolite designed to help bind heavy metals and environmental toxins, support your body's natural detox pathways, and promote daily wellness.
And right now, if you sign up for a subscription where you get Zeolite delivered monthly, you're getting 72% off, 72% off this very, very powerful supplement.
And you'll always get delivered even if we run out.
Otherwise, we'll always save some for you.
We're almost at the 1,000 subscriber limit.
And once we hit that, the price jumps back up to the full price.
But you're getting 72% off subscription price for Zeolite.
And it just fits into the entire methodology here at Infowars.
We've never been the doomers, right?
You can find them.
There's a lot of people out there that will just tell you all hope is lost and everything's going down.
The world's going to be destroyed.
We tell you that is the intention.
That's what they're trying desperately to do, but that they have to contend with human will.
And that if you organize and if you exert your will and if you recognize that you are just as powerful as them, then we can defeat them and we can win and we can embrace humanity and reach for the stars.
We can actually do this stuff.
In the same way, like we'll tell you about the poison in the food and waters.
We'll also give you water filters that deals with the problem.
Because there's always been a two-track response from Infowars, the individual and the societal communal, right?
We have to pass laws to get things like fluoride out of our water.
At the same time, until that happens, you got to be filtering your own.
We want heavy metals out of our soil, heavy metals out of our air, heavy metals out of our food and water.
Until then, you might want to be taking zeolite.
You got to do both these things.
It's not one or the other, and one is not sufficient, but you got to do at least one.
Really, we should be doing both.
So, you know, we're not just telling you about the environmental toxins that are poisoning us on purpose and by design with desired outcomes of lowering testosterone, lowering fertility, creating a helpless class of the disabled who pose no threat to those in power.
We have to get that stuff out at the same time.
Until that happens, you're still being poisoned and you still got to do something about it.
So I know this is a product.
I've looked for a similar product like this because you hear about all the heavy metals.
You're like, there's got to be something I can do.
Well, Zeolite is the detox program that you need.
Incredible absorption.
It's got a very advanced binding agent and can help you detox in the way that the modern world calls for.
Go to the alexjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you.
And of course, go now to get the 72% off.
Once we're out of that initial stock, that sale is going to end.
So it's still going on now as far as we know.
Go make the order if you can.
Now, like I said, I've got some longer videos to show you.
There was a very interesting occurrence over the weekend.
We haven't even talked about the No Kings rally.
And it was kind of bizarre.
You would think, one would surmise that if you really were against Trump, you've been holding these No Kings rallies over and over.
Sometimes they're bigger, sometimes they're smaller, but you've got this big one coming up.
And on the approach to the No Kings rally, Trump goes to war with Iran, and it's hugely unpopular.
And people hate it, and they're infuriated by it.
If you're the organizer of the No King rally, do you not make it into an anti-Iran war rally?
Do you not say, hey, guys, if you're against this war, you got to come to the No Kings rally because that's what we're standing up against.
King Trump thinks he can get us into a war anywhere overseas and we just have to go along with it.
We're standing up and telling him no.
Wouldn't you take that tack?
This is the two-party control system I'm talking about.
The Republicans know perfectly well what they should do if they wanted to be elected, if they wanted to inspire their base, capture the youth.
They know what they need to do.
They won't do it because it's contrary to what their actual goals are.
Same thing with the Democrats.
If they wanted the No Kings rally to be the biggest event in the history of America, they would have said this is an anti-Iran war rally and they would have had, I would have gone.
They would have had a lot of people who went, not because we believe in what the No Kings people believe.
They're all radical left as socialist morons, but they're also in favor of the war in Iran.
I would have gone if they'd been against the war in Iran, but they aren't.
No, they're for it.
They're in favor of it.
Isn't that kind of weird?
Doesn't that seem kind of strange to you?
They wouldn't take this massive vulnerability that Trump is now exposed himself to, and you don't take that opportunity.
See, because to them, if they were like, if there was the two-button option and they could hit, you know, get rid of Trump and have a, you know, socialist utopia or make Israel a superpower, they hit that last button.
That's the one they actually care about.
Using leftist outrage about Trump is a convenient, you know, way to gain power to achieve that ultimate goal, totally at odds and possibly diametrically opposed to what the leftists actually believe, but it doesn't matter to them.
That's the path to power.
That's what they're going to use and achieve.
So we've got some videos from the No Kings protest.
Again, it could have been big.
It could have been incredible.
It could have been really a monumental thing.
It wasn't, though, because the people controlling it are essentially leftist neocons, is really the way to think about them.
They are the left wing of the neocons, which is to say they're neocons because the neocons are left wing too.
Let's go to clip 38 here.
This was a brilliant interaction between a troll and I guess another troll.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Isn't it a little bit homophobic that we're so focused on the straits of Homuz and not the gays of Homuz?
I agree.
Yes, for sure.
Why do you think they're willing to leave the gays of Homuz behind?
I think it's just history.
Historically, like, you know, gays have always been very discriminated against, which is wrong on so many levels.
Even in war.
Yeah, even in war, it just takes more reform in government, obviously, and then also educating society.
Just feel like if we're going to go in there, we can leave the gay people behind.
I don't think we should go in there at all, but if we're going to the gays of Hormuz, we could turn it into fire island.
Now, to any leftists that may have maybe mistakenly watching me right now.
That's what you all sound like to us all the time, just so you know.
Just so you're aware.
Like, I know because it was the straight of Hormuz and the gays of Hormuz, like it's kind of an obvious play on words that was designed to troll her and make her look stupid.
But she's about as on the ball as any of you people on any topic, really.
So I just want you to understand, like, that's how we see all of you all of the time.
That was not a unique, uniquely embarrassing moment.
That's what all of your beliefs essentially boil down to: is like, yeah, why can't Carg Island be the new fire island?
Like, what are you even talking about?
What are we saying here?
You people are off the reservation and yet extremely confident in your beliefs, which is a very, very dangerous combination.
Now, I want to go to clip 23 here.
This seems real to me.
I can't, I kind of don't believe that it's real.
I don't think it's real, but it's very funny.
It's very well done.
And it almost seems real.
Let's go to clip 23 here.
Just before we get into the real hellish nuclear war stuff, let's laugh a little bit more at this person trying to outwoke their HR person at work.
Let's watch.
unidentified
And I think you can say restroom.
Oh, okay.
But, you know, looking at the bigger picture of the.
I don't know if he can say the B word.
Okay.
Yeah.
You know, big.
There's just like a lot of history behind that.
Like the proud activist Lizzo, she like worked tirelessly to like kind of like de-platformize that word.
Yeah, so um yeah, so maybe use like um substantial.
You know what?
I think I'm gonna write that down real quick.
But yeah, just circling back to this.
Oh, I don't know if you can use the shape circle.
It's again, like triggering to a lot of you know, people.
Like even like, come on, like people aren't shapes.
Like let's not use shapes.
Let's abandon shapes.
You're right.
Yeah, yeah.
You're teaching me things every single day here.
World.
Thank you so much.
But yeah, I also wanted to say thank you for like seeing this and, you know, overlooking this.
Oh, I don't know if you can use overlooking because, you know, again, back to the whole blind people, like they don't really, like, they don't like us appropriating, you know, there's terms.
Colorado has turned out to be one of the most disappointing states in my lifetime.
Used to be, used to be kind of great, actually.
Used to be almost entirely conservative, except for little pockets of the elite in places like Aspen.
Not so much anymore.
I think it all went downhill when they legalized weed, to be honest with you, but of course you can't legalize weed without being infected in the first place.
It's basically California 2.0 at this point, which is very sad.
Let's go to clip 31.
They have just passed a new law or trying to pass a new law to take your children away for pretty arbitrary reasons.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Colorado's been in the news a lot, even today, with a ruling out from the U.S. Supreme Court saying that Colorado, once again, violated the free speech and religious liberty rights of its citizens.
Well, there's a bill that's going to be heard in House committee today, HB 261309, that if you're a parent, you need to listen to this.
You need to know what is being considered by the state of Colorado to take away your rights with your child.
Now, this bill would specifically apply in situations where parents are getting custody of their child.
So like divorce proceedings or, you know, whatever a child custody agreement is being re-looked at.
So this doesn't apply right now to every single parent out there.
You would actually have to be in a custody type situation.
But since a lot of parents do find themselves in those situations, this bill is very, very threatening to parental rights.
And I would argue, as an attorney myself, unconstitutional as written.
But you need to know about it.
Here's what it does.
It gives a very broad definition of coercive control.
And it makes coercive control fit under the definition of domestic abuse or domestic violence in Colorado.
And what this law says is that if you have committed domestic violence, then there's going to be a presumption that you should not see your kids and you should not get custody of your children.
So in order to find whether or not you've committed domestic violence against your child, they look at this broad definition of coercive control.
Course of control, and I'm quoting now, includes a pattern of behavior that takes away the individual's liberty or freedom and strips away the individual's sense of self, including the individual's bodily integrity and human rights.
Course of control includes isolating the individual from support, exploiting the individual, depriving the individual of independence, and regulating the individual's everyday behavior.
And then it actually goes on and gives an entire long list of other things that could be considered coercive control.
Now, here's the problem.
That's an extremely broad definition.
Think about as a parent, if you are depriving your child of independence.
What does that mean?
That could literally mean you are tracking your child through the find my phone app and you're tracking their location to make sure they are where they told you they would be or that they are at a safe place where you dropped them off for sports or for a class.
It could also mean if you have supervision over your child's banking account and they're a minor, so you can actually shut off their access to their funds because maybe they're spending it irresponsibly or it's part of a grounding punishment that you've given them.
Well, that is depriving them of independence.
Regulating the individual's everyday behavior.
I mean, come on, what do parents actually do?
Of course, we regulate our child's everyday behavior.
We tell them they have to go to school.
That's infringing on their independence.
We tell them which friends are good for them and which aren't because that's our responsibility as a parent.
It is not domestic violence.
And so in addition to the fact that this is so broad, it could literally take a child away from any parent in a custody situation for any reason whatsoever.
It also removes the seriousness of actual domestic violence where children are actually being abused and should not be put with that parent.
This degrades and takes away the seriousness of real offenses like that.
One of the other things that it defines as coercive control is quote, monitoring, surveilling, regulating, or controlling the individual's activities, communications, or movements, including through technology.
So that's where you get the using apps to track your child's location or also, you know, their finances, telling them what they can spend money on and what they can't.
There's also parts of this bill that would prohibit a parent from stopping their child from transitioning into a different gender or taking medications.
It would also prevent a dad from discouraging, you know, his daughter from having an abortion.
Like there's so many limitations on what a parent can even say to their child or help them in their lives or act in their best interest.
And of course, there's, I mean, she lays out there, and I don't, there's no argument against this.
I mean, the only reason you would promote something like this is because you're trying to basically capture ideological control of young people.
It's absolutely the only reason because it'll never, it'll never go the other way, right?
And this comes into things like the Supreme Court decision yesterday, where actually, surprisingly, it was an eight to one decision.
Kentanji Brown Jackson, again, of course, the only dissenting voice.
It really seems like she doesn't understand her role as a Supreme Court judge.
Honestly, it seems like she thinks that it's just her opinion that they're asking for.
Like the point of the Supreme Court, it's the point of the point of appointing people to the Supreme Court.
They're supposed to be unbiased arbiters of the law.
They're supposed to just look at the law and decide what the law says.
It's not supposed to have anything to do with their personal proclivities.
I genuinely don't know if Kentanji Brown Jackson knows that.
Because she seems to be answering all of the questions put to the Supreme Court just with her own personal perspective, her own personal opinion.
Like, we don't care if you think that there should be conversion therapy.
The question is, is it legal or is the law banning it violating the First Amendment?
I really don't think she understands that that's the case.
And like, I don't think leftists understand this either.
They don't really seem to have much grasp of like the rule of law, what that actually means.
But it's obvious that bans against conversion therapy are not constitutional because you don't ban them the other way.
We've explained this literally for years, but it's really not that complicated.
They're banning quote-unquote conversion therapy, which actually means anybody just trying to counsel young people about their sexuality and trying to get them to conform their sexual activity in line with a more responsible or, you know, decent, honorable sort of way.
Or however you perceive that.
While at the same time, they're like putting into the class plan deliberate indoctrination into an LGBTQ lifestyle.
So you can ban both or you can ban neither.
But if you're just banning one and enforcing the other, then all you're doing is establishing essentially a state religion, an ideology that's pushed by the state.
And if you oppose that ideology, you're to be punished and the state is supposed to like clamp down on that expression.
Obviously, that's out of lines of the First Amendment.
Everybody except for Kentanji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court recognized that and decided correctly.
So the Supreme Court ruled eight to one against a Colorado law banning conversion therapy for LGBTQ minors, finding that it violates the First Amendment.
Kentanji Brown Jackson was the lone dissenter.
I don't think anybody has explained to her what her actual job is yet.
And that gets us to things like what happened to this Chicago Bulls player who has been removed from the team because of his outrageous statements.
And it was funny because I was reading about this for a while before I ever actually saw the video.
I don't know if y'all have seen this video, but I was expecting something.
I think I was expecting something else.
For Chicago Bulls, Christianity is a fireable offense, but not drugs or resisting arrest.
I mean, the NBA is replete.
I mean, it's full of people, like the most outrageous criminals you can imagine.
There are rapists.
I actually saw a post by an NBA player condemning this guy, Jaden.
The guy making the post had been in a scandal like two years ago because he was dating an underage girl.
So you have like literal pedophiles, literal like statutory rapists, actual rapists, domestic, you know, violence committers.
That's all fine.
But this guy, this Jaden character, he took it too far.
And the Chicago Bull, they just can't stand for that.
And let's go to clip 12 here.
Let's see what this guy has to say about it.
This is Mike Vrabble, I guess.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Travion quoted some Bible verses supporting a Chicago Bulls player who got released for some comments that he made.
And I just, how do you measure the line between conduct detrimental to the team, which is why the Bulls released the player in their view, and allowing the 23-year-old to express his personal beliefs?
I think there is a fine line.
I want to tell you, I love Travion.
I love the person.
He cares deeply about our team.
He cares deeply about his faith.
He cares deeply about his family, his wife, the people in our building.
And so I want them to be able to express what they believe in their heart and in their mind.
But also want to make sure that they're educated.
And we want to be inclusive.
We want to, everything we want to do wants to provide an environment for people to, one, feel comfortable, but also to share their personal beliefs.
And then also we represent the team and then we represent the organization.
So that's why you fired the guy for expressing himself.
Yeah, you know, you just, you just fired a guy for, and I'll show you the clip on the other side.
We got to go commercial break.
But this is so, I feel like it's so emblematic of the modern world where they're like, you fired somebody for expressing a very boilerplate religious belief.
You fired somebody for merely stating essentially that they're a Christian.
And the response is, yeah, because we want to be inclusive.
Okay.
Cool.
Do you understand?
Like, that's all you need to know.
Why'd you fire the Christian?
Oh, because we want to be inclusive of everybody.
We want everybody to feel comfortable expressing themselves.
So we fired the guy who expressed himself.
Wait till you hear what the guy actually said, what he got fired for.
Blow your mind.
Yes, folks, the Chicago Bulls fired a player for expressing his Christian opposition to participating in an LGBTQ program.
And so they fired him because they care so much about inclusivity.
They care so much about inclusivity, they're firing people that disagree with them.
Maybe have a different perspective.
See, you have to wear the Black Lives Matter jersey.
You have to wear the rainbow jersey.
You have to celebrate pride.
And if not, you're not being inclusive.
Everybody has to agree on this.
Anybody that doesn't isn't being inclusive and will be excluded.
Okay?
Just laying out how little sense this makes on the face of it, but obviously they don't care about inclusion.
I don't know if I need to tell you this.
They don't care about inclusion.
They care about submission.
They care about cohesion, pushing their beliefs, pushing their morality, their mentality, their moral system on everybody else.
And if you oppose it, you're the bad guy because you're not being inclusive.
I don't think I need to hammer that home.
I think it's just should be obvious to everybody.
And this is kind of the frustration I feel on a daily basis.
Everything our enemies believe is self-contradictory.
And it's absurd that I even have to explain it.
And it makes me feel crazy because of all the people online that are like either pretending to go along with this or genuinely don't have the IQ to figure out that it's incoherent and obviously a lie.
Stories at InfoWars.
Jaden Ivey, a former player of the NBA's Chicago Bulls, was let go by the team on Monday after he criticized the league's Pride Month celebrations as unrighteous according to his Christian faith.
And like I said, it's like, guy got fired.
Nobody's really standing up for him.
Like there are some, you know, the headline from InfoWars is Christian athletes come to defense of NBA player, fired for criticizing league's Pride Month events, but not really.
Like his teammates have all kind of made these like half-assed statements where they're like, well, he feels really strongly about what he believes, but like, you know, I can't really say much more.
It's just like, you pathetic cowards.
All these people are just slaves.
They're all just willing slaves.
The Chicago Bulls announced on Monday in a Monday statement that, quote, team has waived guard at Jaden Ivey due to conduct detrimental to the team.
He didn't beat his wife.
He'd be, you know, first pick.
He didn't rape anybody.
That'd be covered up, right?
He's not like LeBron James, who published after a girl, a black girl was almost killed by another black girl with a knife only for the attack to be halted moments before it was able to be carried out by a white cop.
He posted a picture of that white cop saying, you're next.
So, okay, LeBron James can blatantly threaten an American cop for doing his job and saving the life of a black woman.
Again, nothing makes sense in any of this, but this is what happens when you have no shared morals, no, you know, widely understood, established, you know, basis of morality.
And I'm pretty sure, if I'm not mistaken, scroll down a little bit.
I'm pretty sure this was the cop.
If y'all remember this, it was one of the craziest events.
It was right after George Floyd.
I think it was in the same area as George Floyd, like, you know, Minneapolis, somewhere around there.
And there was a video that the body cam footage came out.
They released it really quick because basically a black girl had been shot by police.
And I was like, oh my God, another one.
Another black girl shot by police.
Oh, my God.
And then they released the body cam footage.
And it was literally like an action movie.
Like, you know, those action movie moments where like the bad guy like pulls back the knife and is about to stab.
And then the good guy shoots him in the chest.
And he like, you know, it's like it was like that close.
Like literally, this girl has a knife.
She's pulling it back and stabbing at another girl about to like kill that other girl.
And the cops shoot her literally in the last microsecond they could have saved the other girl's life, put down the threat.
LeBron James gets online, shows a picture of the hero cop and says, you're next.
Because they wanted to send him to prison for five years like they did to the guy, the police officer that was standing near Derek Chauvin, the Asian guy.
That was a crazy time.
And that was a crazy instance.
It was literally, it was like, you can debate certain, you know, did he overdose?
Was it, I mean, you know, I think we all know the answer, but at least there was some wiggle room, some debate there.
But that, the event of the stabbing, I mean, it was literally this girl had a knife, lunging at the other girl when she gets shot.
And people still wanted to pretend like this was a, you know, unwarranted shooting.
Crazy.
So, but that's fine.
That's fine.
LeBron James can literally threaten the life of a cop who just saved the life of a black girl.
That's all fine and good.
And he's the best and the hero.
And, you know, he'll be on all of the cereal boxes.
But Jaden Ivey, he went too far.
He went too far.
And he said stuff that just, you know, it would bring down the Chicago Bulls completely.
Is this it?
The crew found it?
Do y'all remember this video?
Let's see if it's as it's if it's if it is as perfect as I remember.
And if this is the right one.
Because the one I remember, I mean, you can literally see her with the knife about to stab when she gets shot.
I'm not sure if this is it.
Is this it?
Maybe I can't see it on the, my screen's not exactly right.
The NBA, literally famous for being the most like degenerate scumbags in the world.
But finally, one of them has gone too far.
We're going to go to clip 19 here.
I don't want to sarcastically say, because sometimes I really do tell you, like, hey, parental warning, you don't want to watch this.
I was going to say it jokingly because there's absolutely nothing even remotely offensive about what you're about to see.
But I was going to play it up like that.
But I'm not going to do that.
Sometimes I really do tell you, like, hey, parent discretion advised.
This is not one of those cases, but like, that's how they want you to think of it.
They want you to think that what you're about to see is something that, like, if the Chicago Bulls were to be associated with something like this, I mean, my God.
They have, they have, they proclaim Pride Month in the NBA, they proclaim it, they, they show it to the world.
They say, come, come, uh, come join us for Pride, for Pride Month to celebrate unrighteousness.
They proclaim it, they proclaim it on the billboards, they proclaim it in the streets, unrighteousness.
So, how is it that one can't speak righteousness?
How is it one that, how, how, how are they to say that you, you, man, this man is crazy?
I'm not.
I'm not the J I used to be, but the OJ is dead.
Um, I'm alive in Christ.
Um, you know, no matter what the basketball setting is, you know, I'm born again.
The Holy Spirit, um, and I've been saved by Jesus Christ, no matter what, how many DMPs I don't get to play, or no matter how many points I score, those things are a temporary thing.
We live in a world that hates Christ and those who believe in him, but that's to be expected, just as he was persecuted.
So, we will be consider me a Jaden Ivey fan.
Jaden Ivey reposted that.
So, that was it.
That was the video.
He literally just called Pride unrighteous.
A couple things about this.
One, I can pretty much guarantee you at least half of the players in the NBA totally agree with that.
At least.
At least half the players on his team.
If you were to get him in the locker room, what do you think about gays?
You'd hear some stuff, right?
I guarantee you.
I mean, you ever talk to black people?
I mean, it's like, it's a weird kind of thing because they actually have a higher percentage number of LGBT members in the black community, but they also are like way more hardcore about not being LGBTQ.
This is a cultural thing you may, you know, not be aware of.
So it's ridiculous to act like this is a unique point of view.
I mean, they aren't even trying to like claim it's hateful, but that's only because they can't because he didn't actually say anything.
He literally said it was unrighteous, which the funny thing is, if you ask the pride people, ask people that are out there on pride parades, ask if what they're doing is righteous in the conception that a Christian would have.
They all know it's unrighteous.
They're not out there pretending that this is a righteous thing.
They know what they're doing.
It's ridiculous.
Yeah, Chicago Bulls host Pride Night in partnership with BMO Harris Bank.
All right, so this guy was fired for being for literally being a Christian.
And then, like, all of his teammates are like, I hope he gets the help he needs.
The help he needs, the help he needs is his teammates not throwing him under the bus.
The help that he needs is for his teammates to say, hey, you're going to fire him.
I think what he thought.
Fire me too.
If literally one other person from the team said that, it would probably have a major effect.
If two people said it, they'd have to really think about it.
They'd have to really think, is this worth losing three of our best players?
But they're all cowards.
They're all absolutely pathetic cowards, honestly.
I can't possibly fathom the level of sort of quizzling fear these guys operate in.
You know, God bless Jaden Ivey for standing up against it.
But then to act like this guy's crazy, he's crazy.
He's unwell.
He needs help.
That's the psychiatric vocabulary coming into play.
As if you recognizing the clear misalignment between the LGBTQ lifestyle and general wholesome, you know, positive, productive family structures.
You have to be, you must be crazy.
You must be insane.
Probably need shock therapy.
You might need medication.
That's where this is going.
But there's another thing, the video that we saw in the last segment of the coach basically saying, yeah, look, you know, he needs to get help.
And what he actually said is, we want to be inclusive.
Okay, but you just fired the guy for saying his belief.
But we want people, he says, to be informed and to be like educated on this stuff.
And I've explained this many times too.
This is the psychological manipulation behind things like homophobia or Islamophobia.
They say it's a phobia because phobia implies fear.
Fear implies ignorance.
You're afraid of things you don't understand.
You're afraid of things that you know are out there, but you don't know what it is, right?
You're afraid of the dark because you don't know what could be in the dark.
So if you're afraid of homosexuality, it must be because you're uneducated, you're uninformed.
It's setting up a paradigm, a false paradigm, a false dichotomy that says you're either educated and informed and you understand homosexuality and you are therefore in favor of it, or you're ignorant, you're naive and hateful, and that's why you're against it.
The false dichotomy precludes the position that Jay Niyee's in, in which he understands homosexuality.
He gets homosexuality.
He's not afraid of homosexuality, but he's not in favor of it.
In their world construction, you can't not be in favor of it and understand it.
If you're not in favor of it, it must be because you haven't been educated enough.
And what they mean by that is you haven't been educated enough to understand that you need to sublimate your own beliefs under the demands of the corporation.
That's what all the other players understand.
Like I said, all the other players, you ask them, hook them up to a lie detector.
I guarantee you, at least half of them agree with Ivy.
What they don't understand is that they need to shut up about that, keep their job.
I guess they do understand that.
They understand that they need to not express themselves.
They want to keep their job.
See, they're so much smarter than Ivy, the idiot who actually says what he believes and stands up against the deliberate destruction of our moral foundation here in America.
They're all quizzling cowards or just antichrist owners of the organizations who trade black people like slaves and have no respect for them and demand they keep themselves silent for the continuation of the destruction of the Western world.
Now, speaking of the destruction of the Western world, a lot of people are looking at the situation in Iran and recognizing that we are in very dangerous landscape for the use of nuclear weapons.
And we seem to be racing towards a catastrophe in which nuclear weapons would be a very easy, you know, final solution, for lack of a better word, for the people that have embroiled us in this.
So how would this come about?
How would this happen?
And how would we prevent it?
Well, the good news is that all of the bad guys are actually good guys, it turns out, and may actually rein in the real bad guys who control our country and Israel and are, in fact, one and the same.
Let's go to clip number 36 and 37.
We'll play both these back to back because this is Volodymyr Zelensky talking about Israel in his again.
It's just like you cannot find a more comically evil villain than little rat Zelensky with his like Disney villain voice.
You'll hear it here.
It seems like he is making an offer to Israel because Ukraine has a lot of experience in drone warfare over the last couple years.
It's like, okay, so you're going to offer to help him with the drone warfare in exchange.
You want a nuke to go after Russia.
And he's been, I mean, he's been trying to get a nuke for a while.
Like, they really want to obliterate Russia completely because it's a Christian nation of white people.
It's not going along with the suicide of the Western nations.
So what happens if Zelensky gets his hands on a nuke or the Israelis decide to go nuclear or hell?
America might decide to use a nuke because I don't know.
Mark Levin talks to Trump for 30 minutes.
It's like, what would happen in that situation?
Well, an official, supposedly official from China, has come out to say that, in no uncertain terms, if Israel uses a nuke, China will get involved.
Let's just say that.
Go to clip 25 here.
Again, this is a supposedly Chinese official in the Communist Party responding to the question about nuclear war in the Middle East.
Clip 25.
unidentified
First of all, I want to tell the Israeli government and the Israeli leaders that the moment Israel uses a nuclear warhead against any other country, including against Iran, it will be the device of Israel as a country, as a state.
But our countries have been taken over by a fanatical death cult.
And we're the bad guys at the end of the day.
And the sad thing is there are European countries that are standing up against this, but like I said, they're all the worst.
So like, I don't know what we have to do to bridge this gap.
I've got stories today.
I mean, Maloney, the Israeli Italian prime minister, has basically said we're going to sanction Israel.
This is absolutely unacceptable.
What's happening in Lebanon?
France has said they're not cooperating with Israel anymore.
They're not getting any weapons from them.
They're sanctioning them.
Spain has gone farther than just about anybody.
Now, all of these countries making these statements are also engaged in the suicidal behavior that the left demands, the climate change crap, the anti-white people crap.
You have stuff like this.
Mark Carney, of all people, Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, former Bank of England scumbag, architect of the lockdown for COVID, Carney condemns Israel's illegal invasion of Lebanon as Operation Expands.
Like, all I want, all I want is somebody, and just tell me if this is possible, a politician out there.
There's got to be a couple out there that can both oppose the vicious and brutal dehumanization and ethnic cleansing carried out by Israel and is also not fanatically engaged in globalization and eradicating the white race and destroying quote-unquote capitalism so they can install communism.
Like, can we have both of these?
Is this impossible?
It's like, okay, they'll be against Israel, but they're retarded socialists that want to destroy the country that they rule.
Okay, great.
Or, hey, they're a patriot, they love America, but actually everything they ever do is dedicated entirely to Israel.
And it's like, how did these two things become the options?
And how do we bridge this gap or destroy this paradigm?
Because it's unsustainable.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.