Thursday War Room: Americans on Heightened Alert as Iranian Sleeper Cells Rumored to Be Inside U.S., ‘Suspicious Package’ Scare at Reagan International Airport, and Man Killed After Crashing Into Michigan Synagogue
Harrison Smith and callers dissect a Michigan synagogue shooting linked to Iranian sleeper cells, rising oil prices over $100, and Trump's contradictory war aims against Iran. The discussion expands to Illuminati elites building underground bunkers for a geophysical event, Israel's "Greater Israel" expansion plans, and alleged Democratic anti-white agendas. Listeners recall InfoWars' history of predicting false flags like the Boston Marathon bombing while promoting iodine supplements as survival tools against impending global catastrophe. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this, what is it, Thursday afternoon?
Wednesday?
I don't know.
My computer's restarting, so I can't look where I normally will.
Who knows?
Who knows anymore what the hell is happening in the world?
I do.
I'll tell you all about it today.
We got, obviously, the war in Iran continuing.
Not a lot of big changes there, just everything getting a little bit worse.
But don't worry, we've got a lot of other stuff beyond Iran to talk about.
I'm going to do a deep dive on the UK, try to figure out what the hell is going on in that Godforsaken island.
We also have some terror attacks, potential Iranian sleeper cell activity here in America.
There's also an interview that Brett Baer did with Larry Fink.
I think we'll take a look at.
See if we can't judge it appropriately.
Just tons of stuff to talk about today.
I'm going to take your calls as well.
I have a special idea about the calls that we'll be taking and has to do with the imminent shutdown of InfoWars.
Stay tuned for that.
But we'll begin today, as we do every day, with our daily dispatch.
It's Thursday, guys.
I figured it out.
All right, here it is, folks.
Your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 12th of March, 2026.
Suspect in Detroit area synagogue attack is killed by security, sheriff says.
A suspect in an attack on a synagogue in the Detroit area is dead after ramming a truck into the building and being confronted by synagogue security.
Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard said, however, there are no reported injuries among the student or staff on site.
And this was being reported at first as a shooting.
It appears as though the attacker either didn't have a gun or didn't have time to get out a gun.
So far, the story is that this truck drove right into the synagogue, was driving down one of the hallways when the driver was killed by not a local police officer, but one of the security officers at the synagogue, private security, who'd been hired.
And then the truck either had an explosive in it or caught fire because of the crash.
And we're still, I'll show you a video of the sheriff giving a press conference on this in just a second, but we're awaiting any updates of that.
We also have a shooting at Old Dominion College in Virginia.
But all of these are making people think that perhaps the warnings about Iranian sleeper cells should have been paid a little bit more attention to.
And we have statements from Trump about that.
Whether these are false flags, actually coordinated sleeper cell attacks, or just sort of independent extremists acting on their own volition, I don't know, but I know it was probably a mistake to A, let all these people in here, B, then start a war against them.
That was kind of stupid, I think.
I think that was a mistake.
I think we should have maybe solved the first problem before we made the second.
But, you know, I guess, you know, retrospect is always 2020, right?
Meanwhile, four drones stolen from Fort Campbell.
Army officers Army offers a $5,000 reward.
Investigators shared two photos of the individuals who may have been involved in theft where four drones were stolen from Fort Campbell.
They're offering a reward of up to $5,000 as they search for whoever stole these drones.
But again, in the heightened security atmosphere of Iran and the supposed sleeper cells, it's obviously a concerning thing to have happened.
Meanwhile, in the Middle East, the war, of course, against Iran continues to expand and grow and accelerate, as well as the corresponding related, but not exactly the same, war against Lebanon.
Iran war live, oil prices soar past $100.
new Supreme Leader says Strait of Hormuz should stay closed.
Iran has stepped up attacks on oil and transportation facilities.
The new Supreme Leader, Machtaba Khomeini, issued his first statement in which he said the Hormoz Strait would remain closed.
At least six tankers have been hit in the Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz.
Brent oil prices are back to around $100 per barrel.
U.S. President Donald Trump says the U.S. needs to finish the job.
And the IEA says the war has caused the biggest disruption to global energy supplies in history.
And in fact, we have news of some of the strategic reserves being emptied out for this elective and pointless war.
At Ramlet El Baida, Al-Baida, a massacre on the beach, basically, the Israelis have massively expanded the exclusion zone in Lebanon where they tell everybody to flee from.
Millions of Lebanese people, hundreds of thousands of Lebanese people, I should say, at this point, have fled their homes.
Many of them are camping on a beach, having fled their homes, and then Israel bombed them.
Welcome back, folks.
This is the war room.
News continues to break.
A minute to go, we've got a new video of Benjamin Nanyahu prophesying the return of the Messiah.
It's not going to be next Thursday, he says.
So if you've got something to do on Thursday, that's fine.
You can do it.
The Messiah will not be coming on Thursday.
I think I'm kidding.
I'm not.
That's literally what Benjamin Nanyahu just said.
Oh, I guess I'll have to show you the clip in just a second.
We have a lot of videos to get to today, and so I'm going to try to get to as many of them as humanly possible.
I think we'll start with the video I just put in there, the statement from the sheriff in the Detroit area that was handling the Detroit area attack on the synagogue.
Suspect in Detroit area, synagogue attack killed by security, sheriff says.
We have a press conference from the law enforcement in the Detroit area.
All right, so there's just a little bit more detail.
So yeah, it appears as though it wasn't a shooting per se.
It was, although I guess the guy may have had a gun.
We don't know that yet.
But apparently the truck fire that happened either because of the truck crashing or there's rumors that there was some sort of explosive device in the car that either exploded or caught fire.
But they're saying that the suspect who was killed by the private security in the synagogue was burned beyond recognition.
So they're having trouble identifying him.
The sheriff's department says law enforcement responded to an active shooter situation.
They said a man drove through the door of the building and down a hallway.
Two law enforcement sources told CBS News the suspect rammed the vehicle into the synagogue, then exited the vehicle with a rifle and was then shot by synagogue security, though Bouchard would not say how the suspect died.
No students or staff were injured in the incident, Bouchard said.
We've accounted for everybody we believe was in the building at the time, Bouchard said.
Now, this happens on the same day as a shooting at Old Dominion University in Norfolk, Virginia, according to Nick Sortor.
The shooter is named Mohamed Jallow, a former Army National Guardsman arrested in 2016 for providing material support for ISIS.
I hate to laugh, but I feel like we could have seen this one coming.
I feel like the man had a decade after which he was convicted of giving material support to ISIS to, I guess, stew and seethe in his hatred for America before finally letting it loose on a bunch of innocent children.
Why is somebody convicted of supporting ISIS walking free? Nick Sortor asks.
Jola is a naturalized U.S. citizen from Sierra Leone, traveled overseas multiple times attempting to join ISIS.
He was convicted in federal court and released from federal prison in 2024.
He should have been in Guantanamo Bay.
The shooter is now deceased.
Good riddance.
Tell you what.
If somebody from Sierra Leone comes to our country and then tries to join ISIS, let's just send him back to Sierra Leone.
I think I've solved that problem pretty expeditiously.
Expediently.
Why?
Why was he here?
Why was he here in the first place?
Why was he allowed to stay here?
Why is he an Army National Guardsman?
Why do we have Army National Guardsmen from Sierra Leone?
They're trying to join ISIS.
You're telling me he came to this country.
We trained him in military tactics, gave him a rifle, then he tried to join ISIS, and we just let him go.
We just arrested him, convicted him of joining ISIS, trying to join ISIS.
Wagged our finger and said, get out there.
Go ahead.
You're free to go.
Don't do it again.
Don't try to join ISIS again.
I mean, I shouldn't even be making light of this because he just opened fire at an American university, but it's like, you duh.
No, duh.
No, there's probably like a million of these types of people running around, which they should all be arrested and sent back to wherever the hell they came from.
Problem solved, folks.
Or we can just keep dealing with this forever.
And this is him being hauled off.
So he was killed during the attack.
But it seems almost like an everyday thing at this point with all of these people that we've welcomed into our country bringing their psychotic blood feuds from wherever the hell they came from to here and making our lives miserable.
We'll stick with Iran right now, but we're going to talk about how this is happening in the UK to a degree that is truly shocking and unbelievable.
But the latest on the Iran war is that it continues to not go so well.
Tel Aviv continues to get bombed to smithereens on a nightly basis.
U.S. intelligence says Iran government is not at risk of collapse, say sources.
U.S. intelligence sees no imminent collapse of the Iranian government.
Recent intelligence reports are consistent.
Iranian Kurdish militias are short of fighters and arms.
U.S. intelligence indicates that Iran's leadership is still largely intact and not at risk of collapsing anytime soon after nearly two weeks of relentless U.S. bombardment and Israeli bombardment.
According to three sources familiar with the matter, a multitude of intelligence reports provide consistent analysis that the regime is not in danger of collapse and, quote, retains control of the Iranian public, said one of the sources, all of whom were granted anonymity to discuss U.S. intelligence findings.
Again, the actual upshot of our attack on Iran has been previously dissident factions within Iran have pledged loyalty to Iran.
Like there were factions of ethnic minorities that operated sort of as lawless gangs and, you know, terrorist factions within Iran.
And they're putting out videos saying we stand with Iran, you know, like, and hey, maybe it might just be cynical on their part.
Like, they might just see this as a chance to, hey, let's wipe the slate clean of all the crap that we did before.
We're going to fight for you now, and then everything's cool, right?
Like, maybe that's why they're doing it.
I don't know, but they are doing it.
So what did you expect?
So what did you expect to happen?
I mean, can somebody answer this question for us?
Somebody in the Trump administration just honestly come out and tell us what you thought was going to happen and what's happening now?
Because things are not aligned, obviously.
Obviously, they didn't expect to be two weeks into the conflict with the Iranian government stronger than ever, the Ayatollah replaced with somebody even more extreme, Tel Aviv being bombarded on a regular basis, every major billion-dollar radar array in the area that we installed shattered to pieces.
I mean, this wasn't what you thought was going to happen, did you?
Did you, was this the plan?
This was the plan?
Okay, there's only two options.
Either this is what you wanted to happen, in which case, what the hell?
Why?
What is the point of this?
Or you didn't intend for this to happen, in which case, we need to know what you thought was going to happen so we can move forward, try to correct the mistakes that you made.
And again, like people, I even think people are like sincerely believing that like it's going really well.
But like I'll read a message here, and this is just from like a friend, a friend of a friend, let's just say, and, you know, an army guy who just sort of loves what's going on.
And he says, at this phase of the operations, the IADS has been completely destroyed.
The next phase should be total destruction of all HDBT sites, all C2, and all leadership.
This is all pre-planned as deliberate targeting using B1s and B52s.
It's when you hear about the big bombs going off.
So in other words, it's like, nah, this is all like according to plan.
Like first you take out these ciphers, take up the highest level stuff, then we're moving to lower level stuff.
Now that we have air superiority, then we can go in with the really big bombers that aren't very maneuverable.
So you can't, you know, you can't do it if you expect a lot of air defense.
But now that we've taken care of that, now we can bring the big bombers in, drop the really big bombs and do the real damage.
And so my response to that is just like, okay, and then what?
Okay.
And what next?
What after that?
Okay.
So you have in a very sophisticated and deliberate and strategic fashion degraded and destroyed Iran's ability to exist.
What's next, though?
There is no conclusion to this, short of installing a puppet from a regional actor like the Kurds who can move in and take it over, which in and of itself, again, is just replacing one ethnic faction with another.
Like it's not solving any problems.
I guess there'll be loyal puppets of Israel in America, but we've seen how that can go.
And it's going to be strife.
It's going to be civil war.
There are going to be factions that don't want to give up.
And that's the best possible scenario.
The only other option is boots on the ground invading.
You cannot overthrow a country with air strikes.
It's just not possible.
Do you know how I know this?
You want to hear my just perfect argument for this?
You cannot have a disagreement.
Gaza.
Y'all remember Gaza?
Do you remember a little place called Gaza where they are still bombing to this day?
Where they still can't send Israeli soldiers in without getting hit by Hamas, where Hamas still operates and is armed?
A 25-mile square strip of landlocked desert with no mountains.
They still haven't taken Gaza.
It has been two and a half years of saturation bombing.
What do they think is going to happen with Iran?
So I will just keep saying that every day until it's just like Iran is a completely shattered mess and we're still here 20 years from now.
Like, I don't know what else to tell you.
But like, I think some people are genuinely like, wow, this is like impressed.
They're like blown away at how like good our military is at taking out targets.
And it's like, okay, but why?
To what end?
For what reason?
In service of what strategy?
Like, okay.
I bet I could blow up a lot of people too if I had the same equipment.
I don't see it as that impressive.
I don't know what's so impressive about systematically bombing a country over and over again for no reason, killing a bunch of innocent people.
What am I?
Am I supposed to be like pumped up by this?
Man, America's so strong.
We're so cool.
Yeah, I guess if you're into like, you know, massacres and slaughter, I don't know.
I don't see a lot of people out there cheering on and being impressed by the incredible skill of Elliot Rogers, right?
Oh, wow, the super, super well-armed faction is raining death on the unarmed faction?
America.
Like, we're so cool.
It's just ridiculous.
Utterly ridiculous.
So again, I think like a lot of people, I don't get it.
I don't get the mindset.
But it's like, okay, I guess you know the initialisms, right?
You know the code words.
So I guess it's good.
Well, you don't understand.
They're bombing the ACBCs and next they're going to hit the HB1s.
And only after that can the B1s and the B-52s really bring the bunker busters.
And then we'll kill enough children that the Iranians will welcome us with open arms and we'll have a freedom-loving coalition of democracy there.
I'm sorry, what are we doing exactly?
Since launching their war, the U.S. and Israel have struck a range of Iranian targets, including air defenses, nuclear sites, and members of the senior leadership.
The Trump administration has given varying reasons for the war.
In announcing the beginning of the U.S. operation, Trump urged Iranians to, quote, take over your government, but top aides have since denied that the objective was to oust Iran's leadership.
What are you talking about?
That's the craziest sentence I've ever heard.
Craziest paragraph I've ever read.
In announcing the beginning of the U.S. operations, Trump urged Iranians to take over your government, but top aides have since denied the objective was to oust Iran's leadership.
What do you mean the objective was not to oust Iran's leaders?
You killed all of them.
What do you mean that wasn't the objective?
Like, this is what I mean.
It's like, okay, how many layers of insanity can we have in like two simple statements?
And like, how funny.
The reason I'm laughing is because it's just like, hey, you should, hey, you guys should take over your government.
And you say that just after systematically killing every member of government.
You guys should go.
You guys should go take the leadership position.
Don't worry about the gun pointed at your head.
Just, it's your turn.
You go take it over.
You can trust us.
We're America and Israel, the most trustworthy nations.
So he's urging Iran to take over their government, the government that he just killed, but that's not an official stance.
But neither is killing the government, which we actually did.
So I'm just trying to think of other situations where you can do something and then say, that was not my position.
Like you can actually go out and do something and then go, that was not my objective, actually.
Actually, my objective was never to step on your foot.
I just happened to deliberately do it multiple times, but that was never my objective.
So I am forgiven.
Like, I don't know what we expect to happen next, but that's fine.
So it was never the objective to oust Iran's leadership.
We just accidentally murdered all of them.
In addition to Khomeini, these strikes have killed dozens of senior officials and some of the highest-ranking commanders in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite paramilitary force that controls large parts of the economy.
Still, the U.S. intelligence reports indicates that the IRGC and the interim leaders who assumed power after Khomeini's death retain control of their country, probably greater than they did before.
Because again, I mean, just it's like our actual aims aren't even enunciated.
They're never even actually said out loud.
The aims that we claim to have are in direct dichotomous opposition to the things that we're doing.
So it's going like this.
It's still going like this.
And there's no sign of it changing at all.
And perhaps the craziest part of all of it is that we are actually getting less than the first war on terror.
Again, I'm just, I'm like shocked that this is the real world.
I cannot believe that we're not in some sort of black mirror parody of reality, but we don't even have weapons of mass destruction to point to.
We don't even have a regime that we're trying to overthrow.
And the excuses that they're using in sending us to war are the exact same pointless, meaningless phrases.
The catchphrases, the slogans that have killed a million or more people over the last two decades.
And they're doing it again.
Go to clip 27 here.
And I just want you to watch this woman's facial expression.
I want you to really study the expression on her face.
There are certain universals when it comes to human expression.
And I think, I think it'll be easy to read her face.
Maybe we'll have to pause it, but let's just watch first.
Clip 27.
Remember, they're not giving you weapons of mass destruction.
They're not predicating this on a giant terror attack that brought down two buildings in New York City.
They're not trying to overthrow a regime and bring about regime change, to bring democracy to a reason, to the region.
We have gone to war in Iran, and we have not been given a reason.
And in lieu of logical, patriotic, or moral reasons, we are given the most flaccid and pointless slogans that we've heard 10 billion times in our life.
We have to fight them over there so we don't have to fight them over here.
Believe it or not, folks, they are actually still claiming that.
No, I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
The climate change people are still claiming the ice caps are melting.
It's just, it's just, it's just terrifying.
I just feel like I'd like to wake up now, please.
I feel like I'm in a nightmare, bad dream.
I cannot believe where we are in 2026 through everything we've been through.
I feel like I feel like it's like, I don't know.
There's not even a thing to compare it to because it alone is simple enough.
We are in the year 2026 going to war.
We are in war in the Middle East.
And they're saying, so we have to stop their weapons of mass destruction and stop them over there so we don't fight them over here.
And it's just like, what do we do?
What do we do about this?
This is crazy.
I was going to say, it's almost like I'm sitting here going, wait, they're saying there's a new virus out of China and we need to lock down?
No, wait, no, we did this already.
No, we went through this.
This is the problem when you don't tar and feather your politicians when they try to do things to you.
This is the issue.
This is the long-standing issue.
This is why we should have hung the bushes for treason.
We would have prevented this.
If we would have charged them with treason, if we would have treated the war on terror, the wars on terror, the last several decades of American foreign intervention, killing a million people, wasting trillions of dollars, all predicated on knowing blatant, deliberate lies.
We should have charged those people with war crimes, charged them with treason.
And only after having been convicted by a jury of their peers should we have carried out the due punishment for traitors.
Because then we wouldn't have to worry about this.
Like, this is the problem.
This is why we need to punish the people who did COVID.
That's why we need to punish the people that did the Russia gate conspiracy and all this stuff.
Hell, let's go back and punish the war criminals for the first couple of Iraq wars.
Like I feel like we need an, you know, we've been talking about Nuremberg 2.0 for COVID.
I think we need a Nuremberg 2.0 for the Middle East wars.
And I think only when everybody involved, Netanyahu at the front and center, are tried, convicted, and given exactly the same punishment as the Nazi leadership at Nuremberg.
Only then will the world be able to heal and move on.
And then we should implement the exact same strategy that was implemented against Nazi Germany.
By which I, well, I don't mean that, you know, you should rape 90% of the women and starve 12 million of them to death.
I don't mean we should treat them that brutally.
But in terms of the educational program that was implemented on Germany, I think we need to somehow systematically, through an all-of-society curriculum, weed out and destroy this mindset, this neocon mindset that keeps getting us into the same war over and over again.
Again, I'm not like a facial, I'm not one of these lie detector people.
But you can look at her face, the eyebrows up in the middle, the pursed lips.
She looks like terrified.
She looks like she is lying.
She looks like she's lying.
I'm not a body language expert.
I think the woman in the middle, I think her face could be right next to the label liar.
Here's how you detect a liar.
I'll illustrate it on the other side.
Stay with us, folks.
This is important.
All right, welcome back, folks.
We're talking about the war against Iran and Lebanon.
And I want to go to a video here.
It's a little bit longer.
Clip 22.
It's.
Not normally the type of video I'd play because it's making a pretty like hardcore prediction about nuclear bombs being used.
And I'm not trying to be the boy who cried Wolfright, but I think if you listen to the reasoning and when you hear how he's laying out the facts that we know and everything factual the guy mentions, I can't help but I mean, I know it's true.
And so the conclusion he gets to, I can't help but think has some pretty good credence to it.
And I'll show you more clips that illustrate why, but I think this reasoning is terrifying but accurate.
Let's go to clip 22 here.
unidentified
Could we be witnessing the first nuclear strike in modern history?
I need you to listen carefully to what I'm about to say, because the indicators coming out of Western, Iranian, and Arab media in the past 24 hours, when you connect them, they all point to one terrifying possibility.
Something massive is coming, and we need to understand what it is.
Let me walk you through this step by step.
First, the mystery that's been puzzling observers.
Why have Israeli warning systems been failing?
Why are Iranian missiles getting through the Iron Dome and hitting deep inside Tel Aviv?
Here's what we now know.
Iran with Russian intelligence support, Chinese satellite guidance through the Beidou network, and advanced targeting systems has accomplished something critical.
Something Washington and Jerusalem never anticipated.
They've destroyed a significant portion of the early warning radars for Dard and Patriot systems across the Gulf.
These were the eyes that detected Iranian launches and warned Israel before interception.
Now those eyes are gone.
Israel is effectively blind.
And the Israeli military can't send warnings to civilians.
Combine this with the heavy media blackout on damage inside Israel and statements from British and Australian politicians about legal penalties for filming destruction in Tel Aviv.
And you realize the situation is far worse than officially acknowledged.
Second, the Revolutionary Guard has announced striking over 200 strategic targets and American bases.
Reports suggest America is now relying more on Asian bases and aircraft carriers.
What does this logically mean?
The American presence in the region has taken a hit far larger than media reports admit.
This is a catastrophe for Trump who still hasn't figured out how to sell this to the American public already deeply opposed to this war.
Third, because of these unacknowledged losses and severe ammunition shortages, America and Israel have shifted to targeting Iran's critical infrastructure.
Yesterday they destroyed a desalination plant on Keshem Island.
Over 30 Iranian oil facilities caused environmental disaster and acid rain over Tehran.
Iran responded by hitting the Bazan refinery in Haifa.
Infrastructure targets across occupied territories with devastating cluster munitions.
Fourth, who suffers most from all this, the Gulf states.
Because every strike happens over their territory, every American base they allowed for protection now threatens them.
Senator Lindsey Graham, close to Trump, just demanded Gulf states intervene directly against Iran, said America won't defend them alone.
This is exactly what Trump and Netanyahu want.
It's why Mossad and CIA have conducted dozens of false flag operations, hitting Gulf facilities and blaming Iran, to drag Arabs into destroying each other, clearing the way for Israel's greater project.
Fifth, and this is where it gets truly disturbing.
American generals are telling officers this is a religious war, Armageddon, that they're accelerating Christ's return.
This isn't rhetoric.
Over 110 complaints have been filed by officers refusing to fight for religious objectives.
I'll source this in comments.
Sixth, Gulf states are waking up.
Qatar officially announced it won't join any war against Iran.
Saudi Arabia maintains restraint.
UAA businessman Khalof al-Habtur has been posting direct condemnations of American intervention, saying Gulf states reject wars that don't serve their interests, and that American bases meant for protection now threaten their security.
He said it clearly, we don't need your protection.
Just keep your ears away from us.
A man in his position doesn't say this alone.
So where are we?
Iran is resilient, delivering devastating blows to Tel Aviv, which by some accounts now resembles Gaza internally, and causing unacknowledged heavy losses to America.
If this continues, it destroys Trump's popularity, isolates him, and guarantees prosecution under Epstein cases.
It destroys Netanyahu's political future.
They need an unconventional solution.
And there are only two options.
Option one, troop insertion to seize Iranian nuclear sites and extract enriched uranium.
These aren't like strategic nuclear weapons with wide effects.
They're limited to specific areas.
And this possibility is increasing, especially with rhetoric and American media preparing for such a historic event.
Some prominent American media figures have stated Trump wants to be the president who dropped a nuclear bomb, given his personality, his love of spectacle, his need to attach his name to unprecedented historical events.
This isn't far-fetched.
This is shadow archives.
We don't do fear-mongering.
We do pattern recognition.
We connect what others won't.
If you've followed this far, you understand what's at stake.
Share this, follow for updates, because the next 48 hours could redefine everything.
So, you know, I think when he talks about the damage that's been done to American bases, the damage that's been done to Tel Aviv, I mean, he's exactly right.
And just taking this again from what I've been saying since 2024, which was, well, really since 2023 and shortly after the Gaza attacks, was that Israel was betting it all on taking Iran, that they put their entire reputation on the line, killing the people of Gaza in a way so, so brutal, so horrific.
I mean, they knew that their reputation wouldn't recover it.
They didn't care.
They thought, we'll burn their reputation.
We'll burn the goodwill of the world.
And as long as we take Iran, it will all be worth it.
But they basically bet their lives on this.
So, like, they're not going to give up.
It's not an option for them.
Because they aren't thinking in terms of weeks or months.
They're thinking in terms of decades.
And they understand that they have just put a hardcore time limit on America's or, you know, Israel's current method of existing, right?
There is a hardcore deadline now because within 10 to 15 years, American support for Israel will have absolutely collapsed and will never come back.
They understand that there's no PR campaign that can undo what's happened to Gaza.
They understand that fully.
They're fine with that.
It doesn't matter as long as they can get Iran.
If they can get Iran, if they can be uncontested in the region as a superpower of their own accord, then they don't need America anymore.
And the support here being gone doesn't actually matter.
Actually, it's kind of a good thing because then you have an excuse to say, gee, it looks like America is anti-Semitic.
Guess all the American Jews have to move to Israel, join us over here, and then we can go to war against America because it's so anti-Semitic and you have to die.
So, in that frame, you know, with that understanding, they're not going to give up on Iran, which is why it's so bizarre and insane that there's not any better war aims.
That I don't think they'll just be satisfied with, okay, Iran is, you know, not as functional as it was before.
I think they need it like completely wiped off the map.
And I'm not the only one saying this or noticing this or seeing the sort of inevitability that we're headed towards.
Because I know right-wing politicians in America tend to speak hyperbolically about this stuff anyway.
But these are also the people with the ability to carry out these policies.
Let's go to clip number 24.
This is Lindsey Graham talking about what should be done in this case to Gaza.
But do you think he feels any differently about Iran?
He might hate Iran more.
Here's Lindsey Graham saying what he thinks should be done to Israel's enemies.
Did we think one minute about starving the Germans?
Did we bomb every city into blith to smithereens?
So this is a warning to World War II.
Yes, I am.
This is an absolute existential threat to the Jewish people.
What happened on October the 7th was 1,200 people were slaughtered, raped, and murdered and filmed by radical Islamists who would kill every Jew if they could to the world.
If you don't understand this is a threat to Israel, just flatten it.
We flattened Berlin.
We flattened Tokyo.
Were we wrong to drop an atomic bomb to end the Japanese reign of terror?
I mean, the man is literally just like a cartoon villain.
Like he just, he looks like how Hollywood would portray him.
Like, he just, he is central casting villain, bad guy, evil dude, demon in a pasty, pale disguise.
Looks like a dog.
I mean, it's just like the irony, of course, of being like, if you want to get rid of extreme, you know, these people are extremists.
So they should all be murdered.
Every one of them.
The kids too, of course.
They're extremist.
You know how extreme their views are?
They should all be turned to radioactive dust, okay?
Because of how extreme they are.
I'm the reasonable one.
All I want to do is vaporize all of them.
They're the crazy ones.
Like, it's insane.
These people are genuinely insane and dangerous.
I don't know what else there is to say.
Was it a good thing?
And by the way, the weird, like the weird thing is like, was there one minute of thought?
Yeah, yeah, we kind of agonized over it for like a long time and really still, like, even after choosing to drop it, very nervous about the moral implications of what we had just done.
Like, thank God there weren't people like Lindsey Graham running our country back during World War II.
Thank God our people had some sort of morals and scruples.
And by the way, the really horrible damaging stuff we did to Germany that by the, again, was totally unwarranted, totally unnecessary, totally not strategically necessary, like whatsoever.
And we firebombed, which if you understand, it means like that's not just like you drop bombs with fire.
It means like you drop so many bombs and the fire gets raging so intensely that it is like self-perpetuating where you get like the fire tornadoes and it's like the term firestorm, right?
It's something else.
It actually creates like vortexes because of the insane heat that is like melts steel.
Like it gets incredibly hot more than just regular fire.
That's what we did to like Dresden, right?
It's just like a civilian population.
The UK firebombed Dresden, killed 100,000 people in a single night.
And by the way, that was totally hidden and secret and kept from the British government because it was so shameful.
And the British people would have been so outraged that their government had been engaged in such a catastrophic crime against humanity that it was hidden and disguised and nobody knew about it until, what's his name?
David, who's the writer?
I'm totally blanking on his name.
But he went to Germany and heard the story firsthand and was like, I had no idea about this.
Guy from the UK wrote a book about it and became a bestseller because the people in the UK were horrified at what their government had done and were happy to know that this crime had been committed because, you know, you don't want to be ignorant to the fact that you were in some way unknowingly party to a war crime.
So again, the idea of this cavalier, like, did we even think for a single second about murdering everyone in Germany?
It's like, yeah, we did.
And you could make the argument that out of necessity, because of the scale to which the war eventually got, certain extraordinary measures were justified.
I wouldn't even argue that necessarily, but certainly with Japan, we were dealing with a very different type of enemy.
It really is just sick that we have people like Lindsey Graham representing us.
And of course, the person who's challenging him, I keep talking about, I got to bring in the, it's just fine if you can find Lindsey Graham's challenger.
She's a Democrat woman who I guarantee you is some sort of far-leftist communist, but she's just like, we can't have people like Lindsey Graham representing us.
I'm a mother of four, and I want to look out for South Carolinians, not do whatever this guy's doing.
And it's Lindsey Graham just like, we'll kill them all.
We'll burn them all to death and we'll dance on their graves.
And it's like, okay, I'd vote for her.
Why not, right?
Just hand it over, hand over America to the Democrats.
Why not?
Hand over Iran to the Israelis, hand over America to the Democrats, and then you can die fat and happy knowing that you destroyed the world and put a final stake in any possibility that the American people ever regain our nation ever again.
Thanks, Lindsay.
You have a girl's name.
Let's go to clip 23 here because, again, this is rumors.
This is from RT.
And it's a report about what the Iranians are demanding of America.
And if we had people that actually cared about America, they might actually take this offer and it might actually be a good thing.
But when you know the character of the people that run our country and run Israel, they'll never do what Iran wants them to do.
They'll just get more and more frustrated that they're not winning.
And I think the nuke is like the easiest answer for them.
And they might just do it.
I've never seen them choose not to do something because of like the insane precedent it would set.
The last couple of years has been evidence of the fact that, like, international outrage, international law, basic decency, the fact that it's all going to be filmed and known by, it doesn't matter.
They don't care.
They don't care.
They just bombed an elementary school full of school children and then did it again.
And then again, they've bombed like 13 hospitals.
They don't care.
Okay.
Might actually just be a quicker and more merciful way to do what they're going to do anyway.
I don't know.
And maybe a nuke is the merciful choice at this junction when you have murderous psychopaths with a seemingly endless supply of smart bombs.
Okay, some updates emerging from the Middle East, and they appear to be significant ones.
Our correspondent in Tehran has learned that political discussions are underway at a regional level and that U.S. military assets across the Middle East could soon, allegedly, be evacuated for a period of time.
That would then lead to Iran halting its strikes on Gulf states, just to recall that it said that it would attack those nations if the U.S. had military presence there.
And that is what has been seen over the past 12 days.
Also, one of Tehran's key goals, we know, is the permanent withdrawal and closure of American bases in the region.
The Persian nation indeed has threatened that it will not allow those facilities to be rebuilt.
When we get a little bit more on this story, we'll verify exactly as to how many, if not all, those U.S. military bases either closed down or shipped out and what that will mean for the conflict at large in the coming hours.
Do we really think that America will agree to the demand that we remove all of our bases?
I would love it if that was the case.
That was actually the smart move.
It's actually a win-win situation.
I don't want to be policing the world with having our young men die in some godforsaken desert against the extremists that another branch of our government armed.
Like, okay, yeah, let's get the whole bases out and win-win.
Okay, you want the bases out?
We want the bases out.
Let's come to an agreement.
That's amazing.
Wouldn't that be great?
So, I guess the question is: is the U.S. Army more likely to tuck its tail and leave the Middle East and abandon the place where we've fought for trillions, spent trillions of dollars fighting, fought for years, lost hundreds of thousands of lives?
Also, a major, like the major artery crossroads of the rest of the world.
Are we more likely to voluntarily evacuate that area and surrender it to Iran or use a nuclear bomb?
Which do you think the United States military, the United States military-industrial empire at the head of which sits Israel, which do you think is more likely?
I think I wouldn't be surprised if we've learned we'd already used a tactical nuke.
Some of the big explosions that we've seen recently, the giant mushroom clouds a mile high, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to learn.
Actually, we used a tactical nuke last week.
We just didn't tell you.
So, I think we're very much on the road towards that.
Another reason might be this: clip number 28, seems like the market for nuclear-resistant doomsday shelters is heating up amongst the billionaires.
Let's watch.
unidentified
What I am aware of is that everybody's telling me we're all borrowed time.
To the extent you can talk about what might be imminent, what is imminent.
Time is not a luxury that we can afford.
The time has come.
We need to start having the conversation collectively.
We should have had it a while ago, but we really need to start having the conversation.
Yeah, it's probably already written on the wind one way or another, and it's going to happen.
And there's little or nothing we can do about it.
Part of that is a function of nobody's going to listen anyway, you know?
And so who are we talking to?
Right.
So we'll know maybe we'll have more information than the average person on the street is going to have.
Things are really going to be bad.
And how do you prepare yourself for that and those that you love and care for or friends?
How do you prepare for any of that, right?
So that's probably the best that we can do.
unidentified
I think things are going to be pretty difficult starting in a few years.
And from what I've been told by sources.
What does that mean it's going to be difficult?
I mean, I can't say specifically.
I don't know that much yet.
And I can't really say, but just that a lot of what we take for granted now in life, I don't think is going to be, you know, we're not going to have it, a lot of things we have now that makes our lives as wonderful as they are.
He says that he's as sure as he can be that the people who are calling the shots in the world, you can call them the Illuminati, the controllers, the cabal, whatever name you have for them, they believe that there is going to be what he called a geophysical event, a major geophysical event.
There have been trillions of dollars that have been spent on deep underground bases for some reason, which we don't know why it is.
I don't know what you think billionaires talk about while they're together.
It's breakaway civilizations, living forever, having your own nuclear bunker and how to staff it.
This is the conversation that they have because they don't care about us and they don't care about the rest of the world.
And I can't understand their mindset because who would want to lit like it's Doctor Strangelove, right?
How I learned to stop worrying and love the bomb.
The whole point of that movie is that when the rich, elite, powerful people learn that in the event of a nuclear holocaust, then they would get to live in an underground city with a bunch of fertile women to rebuild the human race and they'd be in charge forever.
And they're like, maybe it's not so bad if the world gets nuked.
That's the mindset of these people.
Like, you know, maybe not quite that like hard nose, but like at the end of the day, they have all the power.
They're the billionaires, the trillionaires.
If they thought it was so bad, if they really thought the world was ending, like what?
So you're just going to be the last person on earth.
You're just going to be holed away in your little underground bunker where the ceiling is painted like the sky.
You're going to live in a cage for 50 years until you expire while the rest of the world is blanketed in radioactive haze.
Like, is that that's your plan?
That's your great escape exactly.
Why don't you use just a fraction of the money that you spend on yourself and your just insane breakaway civilization and use it to fix the world?
Use it to actually repair the problems.
Use it to mitigate some of the threats that we're up against.
But no, they would never do that.
They're going to break away and then they're going to cause the catastrophe because they all will tell you it's a foregone conclusion.
It's assumed.
And the problem is it's not just old coots and billionaires like this.
I had a friend that went and visited the offices of a very prominent AI company.
I think it was Anthropic.
I'm not entirely sure.
He's basically like, yeah, everybody there is convinced that the world is over, basically, that we have like maybe 10 years left and that the only thing to do is party as hard as you can, make as much money as you possibly can because there's nothing you can do to change it.
It's like, okay, so you're telling me that there's like 100 engineers, those are the smartest people in the world with the most advanced technology ever in existence, and they all are just going with the foregone conclusion that there's no hope and there's nothing to do.
And there's no way to prevent whatever catastrophe they think is coming.
I bet they all have different theories, too.
You know, it'd be one thing if there's just like, yeah, there's a moon-sized asteroid headed towards Earth.
It's going to hit in 100 years.
Like, that's it.
All we can hope to do is like, maybe we could escape to the moon for, you know, it's not like there's like a big threat that everybody just goes, well, I guess let's party because that's all it is.
It's like one of them thinks AI is going to take over.
Another one thinks the nuclear Holocaust is inevitable.
Another one just like thinks climate change is real.
They all just want the world to end.
And so they believe that's the case.
And so they contribute to the world ending.
We have a severe lack of hope.
I think we need hope.
I think people need to understand that it is a self-fulfilling prophecy to say that we have lost and the world is not worth saving.
If you believe that, then you're right.
Welcome back, Ladies and Don.
This is the war room.
Second hour is on.
I have a lot of videos still to get to.
I'm trying to get to as many as I can this hour and open up the phone lines in the last hour, both for your comments about what's going on worldwide, but also because I have a question for you here.
As Sam puts it, here at the end of all things, here as we sit on the side of Mount Doom, as the world crumbles around us and the end of Infowars is there on the horizon.
I have a question for our audience, and I'll take your calls and tell you the question in the third hour.
I want to go to a video now of Daniel McAdams, co-host of Ron Paul's from Ron Paul's channel.
Of course, the story we were just covering and the story of Zero Hedge: Trump cabinet members are buying at nuclear bunkers.
Are you prepared?
Apparently, the rumor is that Hambondi and others have now moved to military sites away from their civilian homes, which has been something a lot of the Trump administration has been doing.
And this may be because there is no off-ramp to Iran outside of nuclear exchange.
Now, I don't think that's an accident, but here's Daniel McAdams and Ron Paul breaking down the possible off-ramps that Trump may have and why he may be looking for one.
And I think this is the real reason why they are desperate to get out of this war.
You're not seeing these photos.
Even through excessive, extreme censorship, Tel Aviv right now is being absolutely flattened.
Now, the propaganda from the Trump administration is that we've taken out their Navy, we've taken out their missile launchers, we've taken out their missiles.
They don't have an Air Force.
Okay, but if that is true, then how is Tel Aviv being flattened?
They're not doing it themselves.
So there is a desperation sinking in.
The Israelis have fired all of their interceptor missiles.
They can't stop these missiles coming in right now.
And it's getting into the dangerous phase.
I had two videos, though, I wanted to play because, I mean, we could probably spend this whole show doing videos of Trump.
But he said a couple of things yesterday that led me to believe that he's panicking too.
Because to me, it looks like he's trying to shift blame for starting this war onto his own son-in-law and Steve Witkoff.
A while ago, they told Mr. Witkoff, who is standing right over here, they said, They actually said we want to keep building.
Essentially, in a real nutshell, we want to continue to build nuclear weapons.
If we didn't knock out Midnight Hammer, if we didn't knock out their Iranian potential, if we didn't do that with Midnight Hammer, they would have had a nuclear weapon.
The essence of what he says is that Steve Witkoff told him that the Iranians told Steve Witkoff that we want to keep building nuclear weapons.
There's no evidence for that.
The interlocutors say this did not happen.
It's a flat-out lie.
So either Witkoff was lying when he told the president that, or the president is lying right now when he said that.
But now that the other one is probably even worse because he basically admitted that he started this war on the advice of two real estate developers and a Fox News personality.
Go on to this next one because this is not how you start wars.
And again, as frustrated as I am about the absurdity of yet another Middle East war, I can only imagine Ron Paul, who had 20 years of experience in this before I was even born.
Got to be frustrating.
It's time we break this cycle.
It's time we get out of this ridiculous quagmire.
Welcome back, folks.
Second hour of the war room is on.
We have so much to cover.
This is just crazy.
So apparently the latest from Bill Melujin is that the person who drove a vehicle into the Michigan synagogue today, the vehicle is registered to a naturalized U.S. citizen from Lebanon who lives in Dearborn, Michigan.
So there's that.
That's the latest from there.
We also have Mamdani doing a Muslim ceremony of some sort in New York City Hall.
Absolutely infuriating.
Because, again, it's just like, it's like we're not supposed to notice.
It's like we're supposed to think this is fine.
It's ridiculous.
I got so much to get to.
So we'll finish off with Iran here.
We get to Lebanon, what's happening there.
I really want to show you what the latest interview with Larry Fink that is kind of hilarious because he's pressed on the woke crap he pushed.
I got to talk about the UK because what is going on there.
So fresh U.S. Intel assessment after Iran says Iran regime not even close to collapse after two weeks of war.
Okay, so it's supposed to last 48 hours.
This is the Gilligans Island trip of wars, right?
So it's be a three-hour tour.
We'll be here several years from now.
Iran's new leader vows to keep Hormuz shut in his defiant first remarks, saying Iran will fight on and keep the Strait of Hormuz shut as leverage against the United States.
He says that the popular demand in Iran is to continue our effective defense and make the enemy regret it.
The lever of blocking the Strait of Hormuz must continue to be used, Khomeini added, referring to the shipping route through which one-fifth of all global oil normally passes along Iran's coast.
And he is saying that he's not only doing this out of strategic necessity, but because his people demand it.
Because once again, if our plan the whole time was to, you know, make the ruling regime of Iran untenable, we have done exactly the opposite of that.
I think deliberately.
Trump will release 172 million barrels of oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, tapping the strategic petroleum reserve.
The U.S. will release 172 million barrels to help lower prices amid the Iran war.
Amid the Iran war, gasoline prices rose to about $358 per gallon, 22% higher than last month when gas averaged around $294.
The SPR currently holds 415 million barrels, about 58% of the 714 barrels authorized.
And the IEA agreed to release 400 million barrels, the largest in history, with U.S. participation up to President Trump, Bergam said.
This, of course, is a temporary fix, can't last forever, and is just delaying the inevitable crash.
Trump administration estimates the Iran war cost a little over $11 billion in just six days.
So it's been 12 now.
I wonder if we could double that.
I wonder if it's cost us $22 billion or if those first couple of days were particularly pricey for us.
Officials from Trump's administration estimated during a congressional briefing this week that the first six days of the war in Iran had cost at least $11.3 billion.
A source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.
Administration officials have also told lawmakers that $5.6 billion of munitions were used during those first two days of strikes.
So there you go.
This is the deal we're making.
$5.2 billion of admissions, several American lives.
In exchange, we get endless war forever without a purpose.
Great deal, Trump.
Trump the dealmaker.
Trump said he has been briefed on Iranian sleeper cells.
Quote, we know where most are.
They came in under Sleepy Joe.
Tell you what, that's a problem, Trump.
You're not supposed to know where the sleeper cells are.
If you know where they are, why haven't you rounded them up yet?
I have been, and a lot of people came in through Biden with his stupid open border.
But we know where most of them are.
We've got our eye on all of them, I think.
If it does mean they came in through the open border policies of Sleepy Joe Biden, one of the worst, the worst president in the history of our country.
And we've got our eyes on all of them.
But the war itself is being prosecuted at a level that nobody's seen before.
There's one that's about to attack a synagogue in Michigan.
False flag by Mossad.
But we know where they are.
We know exactly where the Mossad, sorry, I mean, Iranian sleeper cells are.
We got our eye on them.
Don't worry.
No, I'm worried.
No, it's again, it just doesn't make sense.
I mean, the only, it's like either there are sleeper cells and we should probably arrest them and we're not arresting them probably because we want them to do something to get us more into the war in Iran or there's false flag sleeper cells or they don't know where the sleeper cells are and therefore aren't arresting them.
I just, it's not true.
I'm not sure what the truth is.
What he said, I hope isn't true.
I hope there are not Iranian sleeper cells in America waiting to be activated, being watched by the FBI, being observed in this by the CIA.
That's the wrong way to deal with this.
But okay, great.
Very reassuring.
Of course, it was Sleepy Joe to let these people across the border.
I guess that would be one of the many reasons why everybody in his administration should have at this point in Trump's administration been charged with treason and convicted for crimes that they committed.
Only one of which, and perhaps a minor one in the great scheme of things, being the proliferation of sleeper cells from any number of countries or enemies of us, China included, but Iran included as well.
And I also just, I mean, for the record, if I was Iran, I wouldn't be doing sleeper cells.
I would know that Americans being attacked in their homeland would be the one thing that would guarantee that this war continue.
That the Iranian leadership's best weapon at this point is the fact that this war is unpopular and can't be sustained politically for that much longer.
So I don't know.
I mean, I know our leadership is suicidal and, you know, willing to kill its own people and pursue just utterly nonsensical foreign aid or foreign activity, but I don't get that from Iran.
I don't get that sentiment from Iran seems smart to me.
They seem like the things they do have a purpose and a reason and it's strategic and it's all a part of like a wider plan.
I just genuinely do not believe that Iran would be that stupid.
Okay.
Maybe I'm wrong, but seriously.
And usually these types of like, you know, hunches are correct.
We had the exact same hunch, if you want to call it that, when Barack Obama said, if Bashir al-Assad uses chemical weapons against his own people, America will get involved in the Assyrian civil war.
And like the next week, it was reports of, oh, Assad has used a chemical weapon against his own people.
Like, wait, he was winning the war.
He was handling the civil war.
He didn't need to use chemical weapons by any means.
But you're saying that he just did against this random village just so he could cross Obama's red line, not because it was useful to him, not because it was an act of necessity, but seemingly only to cross that red line and fulfill the demand that America get into the war.
And no.
No, no, no.
Bashir Assad is not an idiot.
He's not suicidal.
And he didn't just deliberately do the one thing that would get America into the war.
And of course, we are right about Bashir al-Assad.
The official UN weapons inspectors confirmed that there was never a weapons attack, even though it was a chemical weapon attack, even though to this day, they still say that there was.
There wasn't.
So again, my thing is like, I don't, for one thing, I wouldn't be surprised if there are any, like, if I was Iran, A, absolutely, I would be sending people into America.
And this is the thing.
It's not like, it's not like this is contradictory.
It's not like I'm saying there are sleeper cells, there aren't sleepler cells.
I'm saying if I was Iran, I would absolutely have put sleeper cells into America.
Your enemy is America, and they have an open border policy.
They don't even check your ID.
Hell yeah.
How many people can we spare?
Send 10,000, 100,000 people.
Get them all in there.
Of course you would do that.
Why, again, why wouldn't you?
So if there are Iranian sleeper cells, I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest.
It would be irresponsible of them not to with an open border under Joe Biden.
That being said, for them to activate sleeper cells now would be suicidal and completely counterproductive to all of their stated and very sensible war aims compared to ours.
From Keith Woods, Trump's war in Iran is causing Gulf states to reassess their relationship with the U.S. and look to diversify their foreign partnerships.
Quote, many believed he dragged the Gulf into a war shaped heavily by Israel without sharing a plan and acting hastily and without fully weighing the political and economic fallout for allies.
The U.S. is simply torching its diplomatic leverage for Israeli interests.
Same time, analysts say the war has left the Gulf states reassessing both their security dependence on Washington and the prospect of eventually engaging Tehran on new regional security arrangements, even as trust in Iran has collapsed.
For decades, relations between Washington and the Gulf states rested on an implicit trade-off.
Gulf energy and capital, including hundreds of billions of dollars spent on U.S. arms, advanced technology and goods and services in return for U.S. protection, said Fawaz Gurgis of the London School of Economics.
He says the war has shaken those assumptions.
Now, he says Gulf states would accelerate their efforts to diversify their foreign and security partnerships, realizing, quote, they cannot rely on the United States to protect their energy, oil, gas, their people, and their sovereignty.
And Iran knows they can't trust us in negotiations.
And I mean, it's just like, yeah, we're burning every diplomatic ties.
We're burning our foothold in the region.
We're burning our ability to actually come to agreements with other countries or negotiate an end to this war.
We have sacrificed it all on the altar of Israel.
It is all for the sake of Israel and not for their existence.
Remember, I don't know how many times I've said this in the last three years.
It's all about Israel's total freedom of action to kill anybody they want.
That's what we're fighting for.
It's not for Israel's survival.
There could have been a settlement agreement.
There have been ceasefires that Israel hasn't upheld.
The options were either Israel can chill out a little bit and just stop murdering everybody and just calm down and give rights to the people that are living as slaves right now and give representation to the people.
They didn't want to do that.
They didn't want to treat their neighbors like humans.
So they'd rather get America into a catastrophic and self-defeating war against Iran.
I've got a couple of videos to go to about that.
First, let's go to clip 25 here.
This is a reporter from NBC asking a top Netanyahu advisor about why America had to go to war with Iran and what the big threat was.
You think they have a good answer?
No, they're lying.
The real answer is because they want the Greater Israel Project and they want to no longer be relying on America while simultaneously destroying America and building up their own base in the Middle East to be a hegemonic power in that area, like we've been telling you since 2024.
Let's watch Clip 25 here.
unidentified
What information did you have that Iran was about to carry out an imminent attack?
One good indication was that for 47 years they've been saying death to America.
He says they slaughtered tens of thousands of their own people.
It's like, I would love to see just any evidence of that.
They just keep saying it.
I've never seen this backed up.
I've never seen it reported officially.
As far as I can tell, there was something like some sort of report that guessed there were 3,000 people killed.
And then they said, but, you know, that's probably 10 times less than the real number.
So let's go ahead and multiply that by 10.
Now, the official story that we're starting a war over is that 30,000 people died.
You show me a single picture of a single person dying.
Do you know how many 30,000 people is?
And there was not a single image of any of it.
There was never a report, never an account from an Iranian saying this.
This is the crazy, at least with the first Gulf War, you had the girls sit and give the testimony about the babies and incubators.
They didn't even bother to do the testimony this time.
They're just coming on going, yeah, they killed babies and incubators.
Don't ask questions.
Stop questioning me.
They killed babies, 10,000 babies and incubators.
They killed them.
You're saying we should let them live.
And it's like, they are literally just making things up.
It is completely insane.
Again, you just, we could go over and over on it, but the craziest part, obviously, is the fact that they're saying that Iran is at war with all of its neighbors.
It's like, and I love the NBC guys, like, you mean right now during the hot war?
I'm talking about what's leading up to the war.
Like, I know he knows what you're asking.
He doesn't have an answer.
But it's just particularly ironic because Israel has literally attacked seven of its neighbors in the last year.
And now they are slating all of Lebanon for total destruction, total, abject, complete eradication of the Lebanese people.
They have just expanded their exclusion zone where they're telling people to evacuate to another like 1.2 million people.
And by the way, the people that did evacuate from the zones they were told to evacuate from pitched tents on the beach and then they got bombed there.
So again, it's crazy because like they come up with these excuses for what they did to Gaza.
And the excuses aren't even valid.
They're not even good, but they apply them to Gaza.
And then they come up with all these other excuses for Iran.
Again, totally made up, total baseless accusations, just ridiculous nonsense.
But at least they make them.
And then they just bomb the hell out of Lebanon and don't even bother to give you a reason or make an excuse.
They don't even make the argument that like, well, they're Palestinians.
Palestine never existed.
Again, ridiculous when they claim this stuff, but at least it's a claim.
With Lebanon, it's like, okay, Lebanon exists.
The people have been there for 5,000 years.
It was never, you know, a part of God's promised Israel, whatever.
It doesn't matter.
They're like, we're killing everybody in Lebanon.
And if you think I'm exaggerating, I'm not.
I actually translated this myself.
This is retired Israeli general Uzi Dayan.
He's on Israeli Channel 12.
Asked about what Israel's next step in Lebanon is.
Again, you're not going to find this translation anywhere.
I did it myself using AI.
So it's the same voice.
First, you'll hear the voice ask the question.
That's the reporter asking.
And then the same voice answers the question.
It's kind of confusing, but it's because I did it through AI.
This is the only place you will get this.
It's clip 33.
Here's retired Israeli general Uzi Dayan about what is planned for innocent neighbor of Israel, Lebanon.
So after a night of incessant firing towards the north and Hezbollah's announcement of a military operation, what should be the next step for Israel in Lebanon?
Lebanon needs to act immediately, quickly, with all its might.
This is a real failure.
What is happening there?
What is acting quickly and strongly?
A, to occupy territory, expel everyone who is there, destroy everything there and declare it a death zone, meaning that no one walks there, neither Cypriots nor anyone who sees it.
Nor UNIFIL nor IDF soldiers and make it a death zone while continuing to bomb Hezbollah wherever possible, everywhere in Lebanon and issue an ultimatum to the Lebanese government or you outlaw them.
Act accordingly.
In short, you are thwarting the rapid growth.
If not, we will destroy all the infrastructure in Lebanon.
This is something we are going to do.
And I am talking about electricity, water, transportation.
This is what needs to be done and time allocated for it in days.
But that was the Israeli general being asked about what would be done to Lebanon.
He says we need to act immediately and quickly with all our might.
What's happening there is truly a failure.
He says we need to strongly occupy an area, expel everyone who's there, destroy everything there, and declare it a death zone.
That is to say, no one's walking around there, not villages, not shepherds, not UNIFIL, not IDF soldiers.
Make it a death zone.
At the same time, continue to bomb Hezbollah everywhere possible, everywhere in Lebanon, and issue an ultimatum to the Lebanese government, or you outlaw them.
Act accordingly.
In short, you eliminate the malignant growth.
Lebanon, the country of Lebanon.
If not, we will destroy all the infrastructure in Lebanon.
This is something we can do.
I'm talking about electricity, water, transportation.
Okay, so Israel is just a terrorist nation of psychotic arsonists.
And they did it to Gaza.
They'll do it to Iran.
They're doing it to Lebanon.
Again, Lebanon did not bother them.
Lebanon is a multi-faith republic.
A third of the Lebanese population is Christian, and the Christian communities are the ones being bombed, including the murder of a Catholic priest a few days ago.
The people that are being told to evacuate are evacuating, and then Israel is bombing them on the beach and are killing hundreds and hundreds of people on a daily basis.
All of this because Lebanon won't willingly give up their land to Israel.
All Lebanon wants is to be left alone.
All Lebanon has ever done is to defend itself from Israeli incursion and invasion.
And Israel is there on TV.
Their official policy.
Lebanon has to fully and completely submit itself willingly to eradication or they'll be eradicated anyway.
And they'll turn all of Lebanon into Gaza by cutting off their electricity, destroying their transportation, destroying their water, and I guess letting them all starve to death.
Here's an idea.
What if America, the great Christian nation, come in and defend Lebanon from the psychotic and aggressive activity of these mentally ill weirdos who think that they own everything they put their eyes on?
What about that?
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is the war room.
I want to remind you that as Infowars, as an entity, comes to a early demise, not having anything to do with our own actions.
You know, that's one of the things that is good about InfoWars having survived this long because people will just assume or they'll spread the story that InfoWars failed, that we like closed down because nobody was watching us or whatever.
And it's like, if we get shut down, when we get shut down, which is happening, you know, in about a month, we'll have absolutely nothing to do with our popularity.
Our popularity is higher than it ever was.
Other places have come and gone, other institutions, other news outlets, maybe they get a big, maybe they make a big splash and then they sort of degrade and then nobody's watching them and then people move on, move on and they just sort of shutter eventually and nobody cares.
We have only ever been on an upward trajectory in terms of popularity and support.
And of course, there's been a little ups and downs, but overall, the trajectory has been positive because more and more people on a daily basis are realizing that we were right the entire time and that we've had our eye on the ball the whole time.
And so no matter what, obviously the mission continues.
We will still be here.
We will still be operating together as a unit.
And I really can't express how valuable this is.
Like, would InfoWars be even a fraction as powerful as we are if we had all the same people in their same numbers or their same talents, but everybody was just on their own?
Everybody was just working for themselves, trying to get their own thing going.
Like, I always picture InfoWars as the battleship as opposed to a bunch of little rowboats, right?
A bunch of little rowboats could be effective too, and we need robots out there.
We need our little clipper ships, you know, flanking us.
But at the end of the day, when you can have sailors in their position doing their role together, all unified towards the same directive, and you can move this giant ship that is a war-fighting platform, that's what InfoWars is.
All these talented people, all the incredible crew, dedicated, tuned in, awake to what's going on, passionate about our mission to save the world.
Instead of just being on our own, sort of going in our own direction, maybe vaguely trying to travel in the same direction.
Well, I was going to say the USS Liberty, but that might not be the best label, huh?
Although kind of appropriate, actually.
Actually, now that I think about it, maybe we are the USS Liberty.
Maybe we will be taken down by friendly fire and a false flag attack.
Yes.
The ship continues to steam ahead as long as we've got coal in the furnace.
And you put it there by going to the alexjonesstore.com.
Go to the alexjones.com slash Harrison.
If you want to let them know who sent you, get the T3, the new iodine tincture.
You're not going to regret it.
If you've ever tried iodine, you know exactly what I'm talking about.
If you haven't, you will.
Okay.
It's amazing.
It's incredible.
Again, I'm not a doctor.
I'm not making any medical claims, but I had a friend when I first started working here.
He started taking X2.
He's like, dude, I sleep like an hour or two less a night.
Again, I'm not saying that's what's going to happen for you.
Don't come at me if you're like, I'm still sleeping eight hours.
You don't know is the point.
You don't know what it's going to do for you.
You don't know what you're missing out on.
You don't know, you know, the effects of not having iodine.
Once you start taking it, you'll realize, at least it's happened to me and it's happened to my friends, like, oh, I wasn't supposed to be tired all the time.
I wasn't supposed to have to sleep more than everybody else.
I was just short of iodine or, oh, you know, whatever it is.
You'll see.
You'll feel the effects.
You will notice the difference.
The trifecta iodine tincture, get it now, thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison.
Again, I'm not a doctor.
I'm not making any medical claims.
Just be absolutely clear.
Since we're on the topic of being sued, but I don't need to make the claims.
You hear the callers call in and make the claims.
You hear the testimonies.
Go read the reviews of iodine.
It's the same stuff as X2, but just even better.
Try iodine at thealxjonesore.com.
Go read the reviews.
Go find out what it can do for you.
Start taking it and your life will change.
You've heard from enough people calling in and saying exactly that.
And I use it for everything, by the way.
Again, I'm not a doctor, but it's just like everything, everything, skin, whatever, like bug bites.
I put it on everything, and it works.
Theoxjonesar.com slash Harrison, if you want to let them know who sent you.
We've got, all right, I want to go to a few more videos.
I'm torn because I got to go to, I got to talk about the UK.
I might save that for just the next hour, but I'm going to take your calls the next hour as well because I got to talk about Lebanon.
I have more to talk about when it comes to Israel, though not specifically the war alone.
But since we're on the topic of Israel and the war in Iran, these videos just broke while we were live, both from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Let's go to this first clip of Netyahu.
He made a speech just a few minutes ago, and it's about the Iran war.
And again, the one thing that throws me for a loop when it comes to the Iran war, it doesn't really, but like the Tel Aviv stock market keeps hitting record highs.
And every time I see somebody like Netanyahu or one of the, like you see the Trump officials, and like they're put, you can kind of tell they're putting a face on it, right?
You can kind of tell they're going, we are doing great.
We're amazing.
We're destroying everything.
We still have a lot of work to do, but like it's going awesome and we are the strongest military in the world.
It's like, okay, maybe.
But then you watch the Israelis and they seem genuinely thrilled.
They seem genuinely confident and happy of how everything is going and the stock market is raising.
And so I'm like, all right, what am I missing here?
Because as far as I can tell, Israel's getting battered, getting hammered, and there's no sign of it slowing down.
And they're sort of lost control of this whole operation.
And even how America is getting hit is nothing compared to how Israeli resources in the area are getting hit.
So maybe I'm missing something, but really, I just think they're thrilled that everything is going according to plan.
Netyahu threatens Iran, new leader, says government collapse, uncertain.
Let's go to this video of Netyahu earlier today, this first one saying I believe we all recognize.
recognize the fact that we will reach to the kingdom we will make it to the return of the Messiah but this will not happen next Thursday The lives of nations is always precarious and surrounded with threats.
Our survival, our endurance is a result of alliances that we forge for our existence to be stronger.
No doubt we are moving from one battle to another, from the establishment.
And with this battle now, with this operation, Israel has become stronger than ever.
And he says, we'll make it to the kingdom and the coming of the Messiah.
So just, again, don't be confused by the fact that people like me are saying this is all in pursuit of some false prophecy, bringing forward the Antichrist.
This is about rebuilding the temple.
Like, this is the funny thing.
I had somebody on X yesterday be like, why don't you go convetch about the third temple more?
And it's like, do you think I made up the third temple?
You think I came up with this?
You think this is something I'm interested in?
No, the people doing it are saying this is why they're doing it.
The people waging the war are saying it's in order to rebuild the third temple, to rebuild the temple a third time, to usher in the Antichrist, to bring about the Messiah and quote unquote, the kingdom.
Now, the kingdom, according to them, is the, when the mosiach comes, the messiah comes, which their interpretation is false and retroactively, you know, disfigured the Torah to get there, but it's that, you know, they'll have a king that will basically rule over the world.
And this is the, this is the crazy thing about like anti-Semitism, Israel, Judaism, whatever it is.
It's like, if you ask the average Jew, like, what does your religion believe?
Like, if you ask the average Christian, what is the Christian worldview?
What do you believe is happening?
What do you think is going on?
That's pretty obvious what we tell you, right?
Jesus Christ was the Son of God.
He came to earth.
He was killed.
He rose again.
He died for our sins.
And we're supposed to serve him.
It's pretty, you know, clear, cut and dry, right?
You ask a Jewish person, and it's also pretty clear and cut and dry.
It's just, if I say it, it's anti-Semitic, right?
And I'm telling, I've literally, my Jewish friend, Jonathan, I asked him like probably six months ago.
It's just like, so like, how would you, you know, why would you just describe like what you do?
And it's like, well, we believe that we're scattered and that, you know, one day God will return us all to Israel and then he'll give us the Messiah and he'll be the king and we'll basically like kind of like rule the world from then on out.
And it's like, unless I'm mistaken, I mean, unless I've seriously misread the Jewish religion, like that is the religious belief, right?
Am I wrong?
That is what the point of the Messiah is when he says the kingdom, he means that God will give you a king, like a physical, real, earthly king to rule over everybody.
And this is where, and again, I don't know, there's different interpretations exactly how many slaves you get or whatever, but like one of the common beliefs is that like every Jewish person will have like 2,800 Gentile slaves.
Anybody that doesn't want to go along with it will be killed.
And I had a video earlier this week of somebody saying exactly this, a rabbi saying, oh, Tucker Carlson's worried about the third temple.
Well, if you don't want to serve us after the third temple, it's fine because you'll be killed.
You'll be swept away.
You'll be done away with.
Again, you know, am I wrong?
Like, is that not the belief?
Like, you can quibble a little bit, but pretty sure in general, broad strokes, that's what it is, right?
Jews are scattered.
One day, God will return them.
And there's like debate there.
That's why you have some like religious Jewish sects, the Hasidics and others who say, you know, this is wrong.
God is supposed to return us to Israel.
It's supposed to be a miraculous thing.
It's not supposed to be a human-led endeavor, which is why they don't like the current state of Israel.
They think it's like a shortcut.
They're trying to trick God when it really is supposed to be God summoning them back, not Theodore Herzl.
But they still believe that God is one day going to bring them all back to Israel.
And then from Israel, they're going to rule with the God-King Messiah over the rest of the world.
Like, that is Judaism, right?
Am I wrong?
I'm just saying.
Benjamin and Yahoo literally is giving official speeches where he's saying he's ushering in the Antichrist.
That in the pursuit of war with Iran, they are bringing about the Messiah.
He just said it, and that the kingdom will be realized.
It's like it won't happen next Thursday, but maybe five years from now, something like that.
So again, don't come at me about the religious retardation that's driving this war.
Swear to God, it was the, I can't remember his name.
Whatever.
He's like a popular MAGA guy, but he's like trying to mock me about the third temple and the red heifers.
And it's like, if you think the red heifers and the temple is stupid, go tell the people doing it.
Go tell the people who are like starting wars over it.
Go tell the prime minister of Israel who's giving a speech where he says that's what's directing him.
Like, what are you talking about?
Why?
It's crazy.
It's just one of these things where it's like, you say reality and people think you're the crazy one.
No, this is certainly crazy.
It ain't me.
That's just the beginning.
You can be mad at me for telling you this stuff, but I'm just passing it along.
These people say it.
I actually listen to them and think about it for a little bit and realize that what they're saying isn't just hot air.
It follows along with the actual actions they're taking around the world.
And then I tell you what is happening.
Like it's, I'm not coming up with any of this stuff.
I'm just observing.
Here's Benjamin and Yahoo telling you literally what I have been telling you since 2024, what I made the Eighth Front War video about.
Israel intends to become a superpower by using America to destroy Iran.
In doing so, they plan on America being massively hampered and harmed and hurt and injured and cause chaos and probably a civil war here.
Get the Democrats back in power here by doing this all on the back of the Republicans, destroying the ability of Republicans to get elected in America.
America goes over to the Democrats.
By that point, sure, they might move away from Israel, but that's inevitable now or a decade from now.
It's happening.
So fine.
The left takes over America.
They flood it with foreigners.
They basically institute every anti-white agenda they could possibly do.
And that destroys the European diaspora at the same time.
Europe has been flooded with Muslims.
I'm sure they'll get tens of millions more from the wars that we're starting here, or like right now, overseas in the Middle East.
And then once Europe completely falls to the Muslims, which they are, and I'll explain that to you in the next hour, then Turkey and then Europe will be next on the chopping block.
Gaza, Lebanon, Iran, Turkey, Germany, France.
I mean, it's just, why not, right?
Why not?
Let's go to Netyahu, confirming what I've been telling you for the last two years.
Citizens of Israel, my brothers and sisters, we are in historic days, days that will be written in the annals of Israel in Operation Rolling Line.
Our war is going and intensifying.
We are pummeling the Islamic regime in Tehran.
We are pummeling its emissaries, Hezbollah and Lebanon.
This unprecedented coordination between Israel and the U.S. and achieving substantial achievements that are changing the reality in the West Bank, in the Middle East and beyond.
These achievements are increasing the status of Israel as a superpower more than ever through our power and as in opposition to the power of our enemies.
This is what is ensuring our survival.
Our threats come and go, but when we become a regional superpower and in many respects, a global superpower, we have the power to push away threats and ensure our future.
This is New York City Hall under Mamdani because we're being hit with the pincer move here because we are being invaded by third world foreigners, many of whom are Muslim, many of whom have no intention of actually becoming American in any meaningful way whatsoever.
Here's a bunch of invading foreigners holding up the one finger.
That's the ISIS sign, right?
Praying and doing their acts of supremacy and eating with their hands on the floor of the New York City Hall.
It's just like so degrading.
And it's like, I did an interview with Sneeko, and he just kept being like, I didn't realize that he was like a Muslim guy.
I mean, I knew he was Muslim, but I didn't realize that's what his thing was.
He's like pushing that.
And he's just like, he keeps being like, oh, but we're like only 1% though.
Like, why do you worry about us?
We're like only 1%.
It's like, okay, but you're doing like acts of, you know, submission.
You're like showing off that you're taking over large chunks of the country.
Like, we're not stupid.
And we don't need to like be okay with it.
And like the arrogance of even asking the question is so offensive to me.
Can you imagine going to a Muslim country and going, well, what the heck?
Why aren't you letting me make it more Christian?
Why aren't you letting me change your culture?
Do you hate me?
And it's just like, because there's no reason why we should.
It was like confusing.
I was like really confused because I'm just like talking to the guy thinking that, you know, we're cool.
I'm like, and he's just acting weird.
And it wasn't until like afterwards, I was like, oh, he's like a, he's like a subversive Muslim guy who just like is trying to make that argument constantly.
And he just kept trying to be like, yeah, but the Jews, you know, but really the problem is the Jews, right?
It's this weird dichotomy where the Muslims think that like you have to.
And by the way, one thing he's like, well, you know, the Jews fear the Muslims the most.
I mean, look at, you know, how they're attacking or whatever.
And it's like, I don't think that's true at all, actually.
I think it's, you know, clearly the other way around.
I think there's a reason that there's been a deliberate and well-advertised policy of flooding Europe with Muslims to destroy it.
I don't think it's because the Muslims are so scary and strong and capable, okay?
Because they're easy to control.
So anyway, it's like, it's not even about, it's just like, what is he?
Why are we being torn apart in so many different directions?
Why are we allowing ourselves to be invaded in one hand while we're invading another country for another country on the other?
Why are we building up Israel to be a superpower to, you know, fight against us, I guess, but we're going to waste all of our money and all of our bases in the Middle East to achieve this?
It's just such an obvious scam.
And our politicians are just in on it, I guess.
They're all just like Lindsey Grahams.
It's ridiculous.
And then, oh my God, there's just so much.
I want to get into what's happening in Lebanon, but I really got to get into this latest story.
Israel drops charges against soldiers in Palestine detainee abuse case.
Israel has dropped all charges against five soldiers accused of sexually abusing a Palestinian detainee at a military detention facility.
Israeli media outlets have reported.
Closing a case, it became one of the most divisive in the country's recent history.
Now, if you remember this, I mean, every step of this has been utterly insane and inhuman and disgusting, to be honest with you.
What happened was a Palestinian prisoner, parental warning, by the way, you know, language advisory coming for you here.
Sorry, we're talking about, you know, the normal function, the quittidian everyday activity of the Israeli army.
So you are going to hear about some horrors, horrible things, okay?
So he's talking about the Associated Press has the headline.
The Israeli military says it's dropping charges against five soldiers who were accused of sexually abusing a Palestinian detainee.
Justin Bonobo, Bonamo on X says, that's insane framing.
The man was anally gang raped.
He was severely beaten and then anally gang raped on camera.
Both a knife and a taser were reportedly used.
There was a hole in his rectal wall.
He had to get surgery to fix.
Because he was anally gang ranked by the IDF on camera.
He also had seven broken ribs and other injuries as well.
After it happened, the Israelis staged multiple large protests in the streets, not because they believed the soldiers did anything wrong, but because they were infuriated that the soldiers were arrested for anally gang raping a Palestinian on camera.
The protests were not just random people.
They included multiple high-ranking Knesset members, their Congress, who defended the anal gang and the anal gang rapists.
They didn't stop there.
They went after the lawyer who leaked the video.
She was publicly smeared and forced to resign and then was arrested.
And now the anal gang rapists who were caught on camera have had their charges dropped.
They didn't win in court.
They weren't somehow exonerated.
The charges were completely and indefensibly dropped.
The Jerusalem Post reports that there was sufficient evidence to take this to trial.
This is part of a larger pattern of torture and impunity.
New York Times and many other major outlets have extensively detailed the abuses at the torture facility.
New York Times reported that prisoners lose 30 plus pounds.
A nurse was annually raped by a metal rod.
Another man was raped by a dog.
And another was annually raped by a fiery burning rod until he died.
Yes, the New York Times reported all of that.
I'll share sources in the replies.
Torture and sexual assault are commonplace at SDE Taman or Taman or however you say this prison name.
And many prisoners die in the process.
The UN concluded that rape from IDF soldiers was so commonplace, it constitutes an official strategy of war.
And of course, these monsters virtually never face jail time because Israelis, by and large, don't have any problem with any of this.
It's just what their society does.
They torture Palestinians.
So this is the end result of this saga in which these soldiers were caught on camera doing this.
Then you had members of the Knesset protesting and demanding their release because what they did was a holy and allowed act because these people were accused terrorists after all.
I mean, they'd never been given a trial, never been convicted.
They weren't caught red-handed doing something, but they were Palestinians.
So, you know, you might as well rape them to death and then get away with it.
And then, by the way, they went on TV and were like celebrating.
Like, this is one of the rapist guys right here.
I don't know if we can go to my screen or I just put the video in the folder.
But yeah, they like celebrate, celebrate these guys.
They made them celebrities.
The soldiers who raped the prisoners became celebrities and have now been exonerated thanks to the actions of the Israeli Knesset.
Israel a bastion of Western values or an insane colony of gang rapists and murderers.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Third hour of the war room is on.
I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls this hour about a specific topic.
Sometimes I say we're only taking new callers.
We're only taking old heads today.
We're only taking classic InfoWarriors.
So I want to know what you think are the top InfoWars moments of all time.
That's what I want you to call in and tell me.
What are the most memorable or iconic moments in the history, the 30-year glorious history of this institution as we wind down, as a final execution date has been set?
It's incumbent on us, sad it has to be this way, but we have to celebrate ourselves.
You know, we were in a normal world, I dare to say, or if we were not who we are, there would be documentaries about us.
There'd be like, because what Alex has achieved here is monumental.
It's historic.
It has actually changed the world forever.
You would think that people would want to know about that.
They'd want to know how it happened.
They'd want to know the vicissitudes of the struggle to build up what has become an epoch-defining organization.
And don't underestimate what InfoWars has done.
I mean, I've shown you the clips, and these will have to be in the compilation, right?
Things like the expert that was brought to testify during the Connecticut trial, who said in her words, that in the run-up to 2016, Alex Jones was a bigger influence on the American electorate than Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck and his next three competitors combined.
It's not us bragging.
It's not us seeing our own impact as, you know, outsized because we're taking a subjective view.
There are literal scientists and professors and engineers studying this stuff and bringing you the scientifically valid conclusion that InfoWars has changed the world forever.
And you can't look at the modern political landscape and not see InfoWars plastered across the whole damn thing.
Even Fox News has had to come around to where we're at in some way just to maintain bare legitimacy.
But what has happened in this office and on the road from behind a bullhorn or in the halls of Congress has actually changed the world, has been historic, has been monumental, has been the type of things that they'll remember a thousand years from now.
And I used to say this more, but when you look at history, things get compressed.
Roman history is a great example of this, where in the Roman oral legends, they basically say this one guy created all this stuff.
Now, in likelihood, in all likelihood, maybe that guy existed, maybe he invented some things.
It would be like a thousand years from now, people look back in American history and instead of remembering all the founding fathers, all the names that signed the U.S. Constitution, instead of remembering John Hancock and John Jay and 100 people, they say, well, Thomas Jefferson wrote it and George Washington was the president and sort of they are the ones who did everything, right?
It just gets compressed in that way.
Naturally, that always happens in history.
Well, if you look at this era of American history, probably the biggest story in all of it is the rise of Trump, which is not about Trump.
It's about the changing cultural atmosphere, the rise of alternative media.
I mean, all of this stuff represents like an epoch, like a real moment in time where people look back like the 1960s was or any, they'll look back and say, this was a major change.
It was driven by this engine, which was, you know, free speech and alternative media and independent people.
And if you boil all of that down, you'll have one figure at the end of the day who represents all of it.
It's Alex Jones.
From Maha and the health to, you know, the poisons in the food and water to the vaccine program.
I mean, Alex Jones laid the groundwork for all of this and blazed the way and blazed a trail and then went from talking about the powers that be to being in direct hand-to-hand to-the-death combat with the very people that he was opposing from the Austin community cable access channel only a few years before.
So I don't think you can overstate this.
I don't think you can talk about the success that we've had enough, especially, you know, as we do come to an end, as we won't be able to use these logos anymore.
We won't be able to say Harrison Smith for Infowars.com.
The name that was chanted at Hillary Clinton rallies and flew above the DNC on blimps and were written in the sky by fans across the country.
You're not going to be able to buy t-shirts that say Infowars anymore.
You're not going to be able to get our stickers.
I mean, now's the time, folks.
Stock up while you can.
These will be valuable collectors items in the very near future because we are going down.
And folks, I haven't even said the number out and we already have full calls.
So we'll go out to those momentarily.
And I'm going to keep a list going.
I've got a document up here and I'm going to keep a list going of historic InfoWars moments.
I only wrote down two because Darren McReen and I were talking about this earlier today.
And he put out a great edit of a rant I did on American Journal where I was talking about the fact that Tucker Carlson and what he represents today and who he is today as the most powerful voice on the right, totally independent, breaking the mold, breaking out of Fox News, and yet bringing his credibility with him and just the real iconic transformation that Tucker's gone through.
You can trace that directly back to Alex Jones.
Tucker Carlson came and visited Alex Jones.
I was talking to Darren about it and he was telling me some behind the scenes stuff.
And this is what I'm saying.
We're going to have to do it because nobody else will do it.
We just got to do it ourselves.
We're going to have to tell the stories and give you, you know, interview each other about behind the scenes stuff just so we can get it on record.
But he was saying that, you know, he could tell, like as Tucker Carlson was leaving, I don't want to tell this.
I don't want to tell the story for him.
He's got to tell it himself, but it's stuff like that.
But you take that and you trace it down.
You go, you know, this little stone that Alex Jones threw in the river.
I mean, the ripples have grown and grown and become this gigantic tidal wave where like the whole world is trying to take down Tucker Carlson because he listened to Alex Jones, understood what he was saying, followed the lines of logic, began to build his own, you know, network of conspiracy facts in his mind and now has become like the number one challenger to the new world order, second only maybe to Alex Jones.
Leading the stop the steel marches in the run-up to January 6th.
I'm going to stop mentioning them because I want to give you guys a chance to tell us.
But that was one that I wrote down was that Tucker Carlson visit.
What a historic moment that turned out to be, folks.
Same thing I'd say, the interview with Trump, historic moment.
Like if you were going to make a documentary or a compilation, if you were going to share the most important moments of InfoWars history, what would they be?
That's the question that we'll go to you to answer.
Now I'm excited.
Now I'm excited to go out to calls.
I had all this other stuff planned, but people called in so quickly.
I want to go to those.
But I think I'll take at least a moment to play kind of a longer video from the UK because the UK is being absolutely dismantled right in front of us in ways that are shocking and I don't even have words to describe it because so much stuff these days is shocking and unprecedented and insane.
I'm sorry the English word doesn't have sufficient vocabulary to like actually express how things are just constantly ramping up, but they're getting rid of jury trials.
They're getting rid of like all of these protections for normal people.
I'm going to have to read some of these headlines, but at the end of the day, I think this all goes back to something I've been saying a little bit recently, which is like we have not done a good enough job of educating people on the underlying reason for the values that we hold.
In other words, it's not enough just to say in America we have jury trials.
You have to explain why.
It's not enough to say we have free speech.
Free speech is good.
You have to explain why it's good.
You have to explain the value of the value, right?
The purpose of it, the meaning of it, where it came from, why it's so important, why it's more important than other values like safety or comfort or not being offended.
You know, like having guns, right?
Being armed.
It's not about hunting.
It's not about sports.
It's not about, but I like guns because having a gun is having dignity.
And it's as simple as that.
It's the mindset of your enemies you want to disarm.
People you can't mess with are armed.
It's a fundamental condition of being an American, that you are responsible for yourself, responsible for your own protection.
And the powers that be are unable to persuade you.
They're unable to coerce you or force you.
They have to persuade you.
They have to convince you.
They have to respect you.
And this is the same lesson that's being taught to nations in the Middle East right now.
Why do you think they're trying to disarm Iran?
Why do you think it's all about the ballistic missiles?
The one lesson that should be beating us over the head is all of the guarantees you can get on paper mean nothing if you don't have the force to back it up.
That's true on an individual level.
So like these things that we just take for granted, we have to explain why they're valuable.
And the video I'm about to show you is a man named Jeffrey Cox.
And he's giving a speech to Parliament about the importance of jury trials.
And everybody else in Parliament is giggling and laughing at him.
And what he's delivering is an amazing speech.
He is a very impressive orator.
But occasionally you'll see it'll cut to the other MPs.
And they literally are just sneering and laughing and mocking at him expressing the fundamental underlying values of Western society.
It's so like disturbing to me.
I don't know.
I cannot believe how far the UK is falling.
But they're getting rid of jury trials.
And this man is standing up against it.
And everybody else is too stupid to even understand what's happening.
Those who were oppressed, who were poor, who faced the full phalanx of the state reigned against them.
And it was this Secretary of State in a different guise who was their champion and their voice.
And a jury trial is the most potent weapon and instrument against oppression, against injustice.
And it serves not just those who are wealthy, but those who are poor.
Not those who have a voice, but those who do not.
It is 12 members of the jury who will give a hearing to people who have otherwise no hearing.
I will not take interventions now, certainly if they're not of the quality that we're having up till now.
The reality is, the reality is, Madam Deputy Speaker, that the jury trial is the cornerstone of our justice system.
Do away with it, and we are in trouble.
Now, let me say, look at the way in which, look at the way in which this bill operates.
It is to automatically presume jury trial for everything which will have a likely sentence of three years.
Those will be some very grave offenses.
But in relation to serious and complex or lengthy cases, it could be any allegation.
As long as a judge concludes it's appropriate that it should be dealt with without a jury.
That could be.
Apart from the excluded offenses, which are, I accept, exist.
But apart from the excluded offences, not just fraud trials, but all kinds of trials will be tried without a jury if a judge concludes it's appropriate.
The moment you make jury trials subject to the view, the individual view of a judge as to whether it is appropriate or not, you drive a hole into this fundamental acceptant,
accepted right that all of us on each side of the house have accepted over so many years, which is that if you are accused of a serious crime and a serious crime is one that could destroy your reputation, disqualify you from the House of Commons, wreck your professional reputation, loss of your employment like the postmasters and the mistresses, that you should be able to be judged by 12 people.
There is a reason why summary justice is called summary.
There is a reason why summary justice was always subject to a complete rehearing.
Remember, the Honourable Lady spoke of how there was no right to jury trial.
Of course there is no written right.
There has always been an accepted consensus on both sides of this House and throughout the system of this country that jury trials are precious for those kinds of cases, particularly allegations of dishonesty.
The right to elect is crucial.
That is what this is being undermined, that this bill is undermining.
That is what is so dangerous about it.
And undermining it on the basis of what?
Arbitrary rules and arbitrary divisions.
Three years.
Why three?
Why not next year four?
Why not next year five?
Why not extend it gradually, little by little, until you reduce?
No, I am not giving way.
Let me make clear now.
I want to finish in a moment.
The reality, Madam Deputy Speaker, is that jury trial is too precious a thing.
We're faced with a question of principle here.
Are the savings that the government claim will be made, contested, and based off by many expert analyses, including the profession, including the Institute of Government and others as well, based upon questionable assumptions, are they sufficient for us to abrogate so fundamental a principle,
attracting so rarely in our institutional and political life almost universal assent across the political spectrum?
Are they sufficient for us to take this highly unprecedented and questionable step?
And I would submit, Madam Deputy Speaker, they are not.
I would submit to the House that we should pause long and hard before we encroach upon this fundamental principle.
I have seen it work in practice over 40 years.
As I've said, I have never failed to be awe-inspired by the sheer quality of attention and fairness that a jury brings to its deliberations.
Summary justice can never replicate that.
We are about to take a step that will irretrievably damage the quality of justice in this country.
You know, when you again, just absolutely amazing oration from that member of parliament.
Sounds like a flashback.
It's like, oh, this is probably what it used to be like.
Not just like screeching minorities trying to get the most money from the white people.
It's just like principled, meaningful, powerful.
And by the way, they do have magistrate trials in England.
40% of them are overturned.
So, or at least I should say of the appeals for magistrate decisions, summary judgments, 40% of the appeals were upheld last year in the UK.
So they're doing away with jury trials, despite the fact that the current magistrates in their limited, you know, summary judgment activity gets it wrong almost half the time, according to the appeals court.
So it's not about getting a better result.
It's not about the jury trials being biased.
Although, you know, the way things are going in America, jury trials are not reliable anymore because half the time they fill them up with leftists that let people go on the basis of their race or give people harsher punishment on the basis of their race.
I mean, there was a story today.
I think I have it.
From the National Post talking about exactly that.
But let's go to clip 31 here.
This is Katie Lamb, lady sitting next to MP Cox right there, talking again about the importance of jury trials and the difference of outcomes between jury trials and summary judgments.
Let's watch.
unidentified
In judge-only cases at the magistrates' courts, free speech defenses succeeded in just 16% of cases.
In Crown Court cases, where juries very often sit, free speech defenses succeeded in 28% of cases.
There is a clear divergence between the public's appreciation of justice and the views of the judicial establishment.
The result of this government's plans will be to further alienate the public and to drag the justice system further away from the views of the British people.
If that's what they want, then they should at least be straightforward about it.
She just said that if the defendant uses free speech as a defense, it only works with the magistrate 16% of the time, much more likely to be effective on a jury.
See, the judge doesn't give a damn about your freedom of speech.
That's not even a concern for him.
So using that's not going to help.
But a jury of 12 of your peers, they understand the value of freedom of speech.
They understand what it would be like for them to be sitting in that bench having said the wrong words, and they'll decide in your favor.
That's why it's being removed.
It's being removed because the English people will not convict their own brothers and sisters for being angry at the conditions created by the government.
The jury or the judge will throw them in jail for that.
Yeah, if y'all can bring up that headline, this is, I believe, out of Canada.
But it's being made official now and being written into law that certain races get less jail time than other races.
Literally.
Man who murdered girlfriend gets reduced sentence partly due to his race.
Everton Javon Downey stabbed his girlfriend, Melissa Blimke, 15 times in a stairwell at a shopping center in Burnaby, British Columbia in December 2021.
And he has now had his sentence reduced specifically because he's not white and therefore, I guess, doesn't have agency and doesn't have control over his own actions and so can't be blamed for murder.
It's insane, but that's an official mainstream media headline that is actual law in Canada.
It's coming here if we're not careful.
But back to the UK.
Not only are they getting rid of jury trials, they're getting rid of the House of Lords, the hereditary lordship, the branch of their government and the House of their Parliament that isn't voted on but is passed down with heredity is being done away with.
Heredity peers to be removed from lords as bill passes.
Will Tanner says this is absolutely awful.
The peers are being abolished because they prove the central claim of egalitarian mass democracy false.
Old World Show on Acts says, he quotes Clifford Doughty and says, With a minor gentry and a larger gentry, the gentry as a whole formed a political power that was to dominate the House of Commons.
With their rise, it could be said: Spain is ruled by priests, France by kings, and England by gentlemen.
No longer.
The last real tie of what was England and Britain to the tradition and hierarchy that made it great has been severed.
In its place now, sits a monstrous gray, stifling bureaucratic tyranny, tyranny.
So, and it's because they're white, it's because the people that ruled England were the people that were from England, they were white men, white families, and they passed that down hereditary in a hereditary fashion.
Because they want to make England into a multicultural hell hole, by which I mean eradicate genocide and then destroy the memory of the people that once lived there, the white English Britons.
So they're doing away with them systematically.
They also are now, Reform UK has asked MI5, their version of the CIA, to vet political opponents.
So no getting elected unless you're approved by the intelligence agencies.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Final segment: we go directly out to your phone calls.
I've asked people to call in with their favorite memory or just what they would want to see included in some sort of compilation or you know, scrapbook of the greatest historical moments in InfoWars history.
I'm going to, I'm keeping notes.
I'm keeping a tally as we go.
Max in Wisconsin, you're up first.
What is your favorite memory from InfoWars's long and storied existence?
Tricky question, you know, because it's like a compendium Jones has been on for so long.
You know, so there's so many things.
You know, his 9-11 coverage was iconic.
Obviously, as you see now, what's going on now with you guys?
Sandy Hook saga was, you know, like a look behind the curtain, deep rabbit hole.
You know, there's other stuff that like broke into the mainstream, like Piers Morgan or even like the gay frogs.
Like that just like what originally was like a joke and funny, and he was serious about it, and it spread like wildfire, became like a meme and everything, and ended up being truer than he was originally predicting and talking about.
You know, I like the old school, you know, like smaller studio.
I think I was probably filming some of this footage.
We went twice.
The second time was Sundar Pachai.
There I am on the left.
See me?
The first time, though, we were there for something else, right?
And that was the time that he was a Senate hearing.
He confronted.
That was a Senate hearing.
Well, no, there's a different one.
Because then we went to the Oliver Darcy was at the tech hearing, is what I'm hearing in my ear.
So, and he confronted him there.
But that was the video that got us kicked off X. According to Jack Dorsey, it was that it was bullying because he said he looked like a possum that crawled out of a dead cow's butt, which was accurate, okay?
But that was still the excuse they used.
We'll have to get the time.
We'll have to get the timeline exactly right.
But there were a couple visits to D.C. in quick succession.
Google is evil is one of them.
Oliver Darcy got us kicked off Twitter.
I'm just thinking I'm thinking that must have been before because then the big tech hearing happens.
We're like in response to the censorship, right?
Because then we also went and stormed into the actual hearing.
That was this trip.
That was the first time we went.
They didn't expect us.
And we stormed in.
And it was the censorship hearing where like Ben Shapiro was testifying, even though he'd never been canceled on anything.
And Alex Jones was sitting in the, yeah, there's Oliver Darcy.
So this was the live stream that got us kicked off X.
I'm a longtime caller, been listening or with Alex since 2003 about.
For me, it's, and I've been a guest on the show, but for me, it's Francis Boyle coming out on the forefront basically very early in 2020, talking about the clock, you know, the Franken shot, as he called it, and what was going to happen with COVID.
And I would say that I did mine based on historical, you know, significance more than the greatest hits.
And that the whole COVID thing was probably the premier aspect of InfoWars.
And I think that's why they re resurrected the whole Sandy Hook thing is because of InfoWars work during COVID, of which I was involved calling in all the time.
I think that was one of the most historical things that InfoWars was about.
I think they saved lives through that whole process.
Certainly, like in the top three things I'm proud of, you know, for my work in InfoWars, I think like my report in front of the White House when we were in DC in either late January or very early February 2020, and I just laid out exactly how COVID would operate because I'd been listening to Alex because InfoWars knew the play.
And I do think we saved lives.
I know we saved lives because I know a lot of people did not get the vaccine because we told them not to.
And very proud, very proud of foreseeing that.
You're absolutely right.
Calling out COVID early on was a very powerful thing.
It certainly didn't mix any friends, but just to clarify, the Sandy Hook operation, like they tried to get it done before COVID.
And I think that may have been part of the calculus.
Because if you remember in 2016, one week after the election of President Trump was the first time that a mainstream or any media outlet connected Alex Jones to Sandy Hook.
The first time, and it was all in relation to why is Donald Trump hanging out with this guy that says Sandy Hook is fake.
One week after the election, one week after we beat them, they all of a sudden decided that a story from 12 years earlier needed to be, you know, resurrected, I guess, six years earlier at that point, needed to be resurrected.
And it was all about our effectiveness during 2016.
They did not realize how powerful we were.
Getting Donald Trump elected was their wake-up call, and they realized we got to shut this stuff down.
And you remember, they expected Trump to lose anyway.
And regardless, they were going to roll out and have this plan to roll out, quote unquote, fake news.
Remember, Trump didn't come up with fake news.
They called him fake news, and he turned around and said, you are fake news.
And it blew up in their face and became something that means the opposite of what they meant it to mean.
But that was a strategy.
That was a PSYOP campaign where they decided in the 2020 election, wow, these alternative news sites are a little too powerful.
We need to come up with a phrase to discredit them so we can use the government to shut them down.
They came up with the term fake news.
Trump was able to stop that, but they started the Sandy Hook lawsuit a week after and kicked us off everything in 2018.
Hey, I don't know if a lot of people remember this one, but back under the Obama era, Alex got a report from a base in Texas saying that they were moving a nuclear bomb that they didn't even know was there, and it was heading towards North Carolina.
And then later that night, it was all over the news.
Oh, Paris might be sending in a nuclear bomb on a freight ship.
And after that, it was crickets.
And the next day, I'll be like, oh, I got him.
I think he stopped a false flag nuclear attack.
They're going to blow up a nuclear bomb off the coast of North Carolina.
And then the other thing, like visually, if you're going to put something like in a reel together, Alex Jones physically stopping human trafficking with his bare hands down at the border.
What other, you know, talking head gets involved like that?
That's why it's, it's like, and again, this is why they hate us.
This is why, in a way, their strategy to bankrupt us has been successful because when I was looking back in 2017, 2018, we went to New York like four times.
We went to Washington, D.C.
I mean, we were traveling all over the place.
We were producing stuff.
I mean, it was awesome.
We had so much support from you guys and we just poured it right back into the operation and we were traveling everywhere and organizing marches and organizing resistance and doing all of that.
And then the bankruptcy happened.
They got control of our accounts and we've basically been grounded since then, right?
No, no flights since then.
But man, that's why they hate us.
That's always why they hate it.
There are other people that have talked about this stuff.
Maybe not to the level, the degree, and with the holistic attitude that Alex has, but there are other people that talked about it.
We led marches.
We told you to get involved.
We didn't say this is happening and go hide.
This is happening.
You better run to the woods and don't get involved.
We said, go get elected.
Go advocate for this.
Go hold marches.
Go make people aware of what's going on.
You are the resistance.
Total opposite of the QAnon PSYOP, right?
Sit back and relax.
Don't do anything.
Everything's under control.
Trust the plan.
The polar opposite of the InfoWars strategy, the InfoWars motto, the InfoWars mindset that made us so dangerous, that makes us so dangerous.
Telling you to get involved, reminding you that you're the ones in charge.
It's your will that dictates the future, should you choose to assert it.
That's what made us dangerous, makes us dangerous, and keeps us slated for destruction to this day, which is why I'm so excited to be starting something new because, man, once the limiter gets taken off, you'll see the engine roar.
I got to say, by far, like the top moment for me was when I watched Alex in 2016 when he was stumping for Trump.
And he was supporting him.
And he's like, you know, I'll support him.
But if I see him ingratiating goblins or getting in bed with goblins, and I expect him to wade into the swamp and, you know, there's goblin slop and goblin vomit, I will never forget that clip.
And it's been turned into so many different little musical bits on YouTube.
You know, it goes to show you how really effective memes are.
This is the dumbest thing to say, but like, you know, these moments, there are 10,000 of these moments.
I mean, 10,000 rants of Alex Jones, right?
Every day he's on air for three to four hours, seven days a week.
It's like, what makes one five-minute chunk of one show better or more special than one five-minute chunk of one other show?
Sometimes it's just because somebody decided to take that five-minute chunk and to re-edit it into a song and it goes viral.
Or, you know, clip it out.
And in the case of the Somali song, like, you know, make it into a meme song and spread it that way.
And it's like these little moments that otherwise would just be one of the 10,000 that we see on it on a daily basis instead become something like a cultural phenomenon.
Instead, it becomes something that sticks in people's minds and they talk about forever and becomes defining of their character.
Like, that's you.
That's whoever made that video.
That's Ping Trip or, you know, any of the other editors out there.
Placeboing.
This was a placeboing one.
And that's what separates it, makes it special and gets it in people's minds.
It's a great rant.
Don't get me wrong.
There's a lot of great rants.
It's up to you to take it and do something creative with it, make it something beyond what it was before, make it something culturally significant.
And of course, it's Alex Jones embracing the meme culture and not shying away from it, not being embarrassed or offended by it, but being like, no, great.
Make cartoons of me being a goblin.
It's hilarious.
I love it.
Thank you so much for that cheeky in Washington State.
You're right.
The goblin rant is another classic.
Let's go to Matt Baker online one.
Matt Baker, thank you for calling in from California.
And InfoWars has shaped the minds of those of us in the trenches.
I appreciate the magazine that he put out.
I remember the Sarnoff Brothers, the Boston.
Oh, the Boston Marathon.
Yeah, and I could prove to people that it was a false flag.
I appreciate what Matt just said.
And there's so many callers that called in.
I actually called in to mention about Dr. Francis Boyle and the lives that I was able to save just around me.
One of my good friends was in Walmart getting ready to get this shot.
And yeah, so I happened to call right then.
That's how God works in our lives.
And one of the things I've been wanting to mention to anybody I could call into was the Table 8, FBI, look up Connecticut or FBI Table 8, Connecticut, and look up Newtown and go to that column where it says murder and non-negligent manslaughter.
Yeah, I'd like to just mention the Matt Drudge moment when back in 2013.
Yeah, it's really important because I had a really important moment, just dropped by unannounced, kind of, and just, you know, kind of a chilling message that was a very blackfilling moment, or it should have been.
Sometimes it can take a little while to kick in, but it is an absolute powerful one.
Thanks so much for the call.
Sorry, running out of time here.
Getting to the next.
And by the way, I agree with all of these.
I mean, I remember distinctly the first time I saw Alex Jones bullhorning Bohemian Grove when he's outside the hotel.
And I'd reference it all the time because even when I first started working here and people would say, well, you know, you like Alex Jones, I'd say, somebody needs to be out there literally telling these people, we are not your slaves.
We are not for sale.
We know what you're up to and we're going to stop you.
Like, of course, I love Alex Jones.
Okay, it's not really my sales.
I'm not the type of guy to go bullhorn, but thank God there's somebody out there doing it.
Thank God there's somebody out there speaking up for us and literally bullhorning these people.
Can you imagine being a Bilderberg person?
You think you're in total secrecy.
You think you're meeting with all and you just hear through the glass the voice of Alex Jones.
We're not your slaves.
We're not for sale.
I can't even imagine what they thought about that.
Meeting Paul Joseph Watson there when Bilderberg was in England.
You know, between comedy and reality, a lot of times in the InfoWars world, it's kind of, you know, yelling, yelling, yelling, pushing, you know, hard, scary facts down your throat.
And you, Harrison, bring a little light and levity to the situation, like a meme, creates the comedy and makes people think about, wow, I'm really looking at this wrong.
And I would say a lot of people have woken up over the past six to 10 years, woken up where I believe that we're 50-50 now is more coerced as one, you know, as far as I agree.