Tuesday Full Show: Government Approaching Partial Shutdown Amid Democrat Demands Over ICE! Border Czar Homan Meets Gov. Walz & Mayor Frey! Plus, TikTok Users Raise Alarm Over Censorship Of Political Videos Since US Took Over The App
Tuesday Full Show exposes the U.S. government’s looming partial shutdown over ICE demands while highlighting Enrique Tarrio’s $3.1M settlement claim tied to a weaponized legal battle, framing it as part of a broader pattern of targeting Trump allies. Harrison Smith contrasts leftist historical distortions with Western achievements in ending slavery and warns of UK’s 2024 "15-minute cities" and Stalinist surveillance policies. Joel Webbin debunks "Judeo-Christianity," exposing its political origins—from Zionism to the "prosperity gospel"—and argues it’s been co-opted to justify globalist agendas, leaving Western Christianity vulnerable to secular pressures and demonization. [Automatically generated summary]
While Christians are being slaughtered worldwide, over 4,800 martyred for their faith in the latest reporting period alone, mostly in sub-Saharan Africa's jihadist killing fields, not to mention the slaughtered Zoroastrians taking place in Iran, Don Lemon's stochastic terror rants, fueling the growing anti-Christian narrative, slide right on by in the land of the First Amendment,
unchallenged by our Soros-embedded so-called justice system.
I think this DOJ, via Pan Bondi, who wears her crucifix, who will not ever address anybody's suffering, they have a problem with those types of white people being confronted and called out on their hypocrisy.
I think people who are, you know, in religious groups like that, it's not the type of Christianity that I practice, but I think that they're entitled and that that entitlement comes from a supremacy, a white supremacy.
I have preached for many years that there will come a time when we'll find out who are Christians by label and by convenience and who are Christians by conviction.
And certainly we're entering those days now.
I believe we should pray for this congregation and we should be vigilant as Christians to exercise our freedom to worship our Savior and to stand unashamed for the gospel of Jesus Christ.
Now the Eighth Circuit just unsealed those filings on arrest warrants tied to church invasions where the judge's concurrence lays it bare.
In this corrupted America, tainted Article III benches and Democrat urban jury pools stacked with Bolshevik sympathizers guarantee these church-disrupting, service-interrupting, child-frightening radicals will never face real justice.
This judge apparently sees storming a sanctuary, shattering worship, and terrorizing little kids as no big deal, not even illegal.
But does the court of public opinion agree with what court filings revealed was said and done by the protesters?
Quote, your parents are Nazis, end quote, was yelled directly in the faces of children while accusing parents of being Nazis who would burn in hell.
Quote, this ain't God's house.
This is the house of the devil, end quote, was shouted by protester William Kelly.
Accusations that the church was, quote, harboring killers, end quote, directed at the congregation.
In the chaos, some protesters reportedly shouted, quote, shoot, end quote, amid fears of guns, contributing to panic that felt like a, quote, mass shooting, end quote, to one victim as stairs were blocked to prevent parents from reaching Sunday school children.
And now the DOJ has withdrawn its request for those five arrest warrants, including Don Lemon, following the appellate rejection.
We're going to be joined in the third hour by Joel Webbin.
He's got a new book out and a video going absolutely viral on X. Very excited to talk to him.
We'll also be joined in the very next segment by Enrique Tario.
We have some breaking news here.
This just broke about a minute, actually, while the show was live.
Enrique Tario posted this on X at NobleOne.
The courts in D.C. have issued a warrant for my arrest because I'm refusing to give them my personal phone so they can entrap more people in their web of weaponization.
I will not, under any circumstances, give access to anyone.
Under this premise, the judge can hold me in jail indefinitely, which is the goal of the AME church and the Paul Weiss firm.
They know I do not have the funds to pay this ridiculous $3.1 million settlement for a BLM banner I never even knew existed.
The Paul Weiss firm is the same firm currently suing President Trump in federal court for January 6th.
They're funded by the Democrats who continue to use our laws as a weapon against political opponents.
I'm calling on Harmee Dillon, head of the Civil Rights Division of the DOJ, to open an investigation into these firms for their malicious practices and the African Methodist Church for tax fraud and First Amendment violations.
I'm willing to go to jail again because I'm not going to have my personal information given to a judge, a corrupt law firm, and a fake church.
Currently looking for counsel.
So if you have any suggestions, please let me know.
That is completely insane.
But not exactly, you know, unexpected, I guess.
It's just insane that we won the election.
We won the presidency and Congress and the Senate.
And yet our guys are still the ones being harassed.
Our guys are still the ones being threatened with jail.
The guys they already sent to jail.
The guy that they sent to jail for the riot that happened when he was already in jail for supposedly burning a banner that a church put up after Black Lives Matter tried to burn their church down.
Yeah, none of this makes any sense, actually.
Very excited to talk to him about this.
Maybe excited is the right word, but we'll get his take on what exactly is happening and get into some of the details of this.
He's absolutely right.
We'll get into it.
I won't go off on it now, but he's absolutely right.
Why these malicious lawsuits are allowed to go on unlike restricted?
It's absolutely, again, just another weaponization of a system that was set up ostensibly to bring about justice and equality and fairness being taken over, weaponized, and destroyed by bad actors.
This is the thing that we have to recognize as a country.
These wonderful, nice, liberal things that we have have to be fiercely defended against exploitation and being taken advantage of.
And you're not a good person by letting these systems be taken advantage of.
You are actually destroying the system.
If you actually like welfare, if you actually want there to be a social safety net, then you should be the one who is like the guard dog.
viciously attacking anybody who tries to take advantage of it.
If you like it, if you want it, you should be the ones furious at the people who are taking advantage of it and scamming it and defrauding it.
For some reason, they're not.
For some reason, the people who love welfare and love the immigration system are also the ones scamming it relentlessly, making it so that we don't want it anymore and can't actually have it anymore because it's not functional.
Same thing with these lawsuits.
The idea behind the American court system is beautiful, actually.
It's actually amazing.
It's actually a wonderful thing that even a nobody, a random singular individual can actually go toe-to-toe with and stand on debatably, ostensibly, theoretically, equal ground with like international corporations.
The classic story of the little old lady suing McDonald's for burning her with boiling coffee.
And it's like, yeah, it's actually a wonderful thing that we have courts where a little old lady can bring a giant corporation like McDonald's to task, however you feel about that particular case.
Theoretically, it's a nice thing.
Then these people come along, weaponize it, use their money to file insane lawsuits, just putting their opponents in a position of impossible options.
You either pay for lawyers and millions of dollars and you possibly lose anyway, or you have to try to settle with them.
I mean, it's just abusing a system.
And there's this confusion these days where if you're against the abuse of a system, people think you're against the system itself.
It should be the exact opposite.
If you're in favor of a system, you should be against its abuse.
Hi, I'm Harrison.
I'm here to explain basic logic and normal things to you that are totally absent from the wider world.
It's really shocking.
Hopefully you aren't feeling insulted.
Your intelligence isn't being insulted by me explaining just like literally basic fundamental concepts, but apparently I need to.
Apparently, my fellow Americans are incapable of understanding basic things like this.
It's very upsetting.
It's very disappointing.
And it goes all the way to the fundamental foundational ideology of our country, like the First Amendment.
I went ahead and printed out the First Amendment.
I've done this a few times since working at InfoWars.
I feel like every once in a while, every couple of months, I got to print out the First Amendment and read it verbatim just so we can remind the leftists that they're not engaged in First Amendment protected activity in any way whatsoever by any stretch of the imagination or by any creative interpretation of the definition.
You are not engaged in First Amendment protected activity.
This happens every once in a while.
I need to just frame it.
I just frame it and have it set up on the desk so we can reference it.
Because it's, I mean, you know, at this point, yeah, I got an arrest warrant before Don Lemon.
What a world.
Not exactly a surprise.
Again, it's emblematic, iconic, I guess, an example of everything that we're dealing with these days.
The First Amendment, the Bill of Rights, Constitution of the United States represent a peak of humanity's genius.
For such documents to come about required literal centuries of striving and fighting and warring and debating and arguing and getting to a point where we established not just a government that would insist upon and uphold basic human rights, but a government that would recognize and acknowledge that those rights exist above and beyond their authority.
It is a beautiful and amazing act of genius might not be the right inspiration, revelation.
Like I do see it in a way in a form of like religious document.
Not that it was directly divinely inspired, but it only came about because of 2,000 years of Christian ideology, Christian philosophy, and the European attitude, I guess you could say.
All this to say is that we don't need to add or subtract or reinterpret anything in the First Amendment.
It is so beautiful.
In fact, well, actually, that's correction.
We do need to update something in the definition because what they meant when they wrote it, the definition of the word changed over time.
That word is press.
Right?
When we say the press, what we think of is New York Times and the media outlets and the TV shows.
And what they meant is the machine called a press, right?
So if they were to write the First Amendment now, it would say freedom of information or it'd say freedom of publication.
It was the idea or freedom of the internet, freedom of communication technology.
That's what they mean when they say press.
They didn't mean this particular class of people that was different than everybody else that had certain rights and a freedom to act.
It was talking about the freedom of mass communication, the freedom of the use of the technology to spread ideas as wide as humanly possible.
So that does need an upgrade because when they say press, they don't mean the freedom of the newspapers.
They mean the freedom of the technology necessary to mass communicate.
Glad we've settled that.
This is what the First Amendment says.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or the press or the right of the people to peaceably assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
It's beautiful.
It's perfect.
It's the law, but it's also just simply codifying a right given to us by God.
And nowhere in this does it mention trying to stop an arrest from a criminal who the police have a warrant to capture.
And nowhere in this does it say you have a right to put people in camps because they won't get a shot.
What the left is engaged in right now, as we speak, simply is not a protest.
It simply is not First Amendment protected rights.
In fact, it goes in direct opposition to that.
Freedom of religion being an obvious example where they storm into a church and literally physically stop people from worshiping their religion.
Anti-Semitism laws are a violation of the First Amendment.
You have a freedom of religion.
You also have freedom to criticize, denounce, argue against any religion.
This gets confused by people because the left live in a world of abject delusion and total inversion of absolutely everything, including the things that they pretend to like because they think it'll be useful to convince us to let them keep tearing our country down.
If they can convince us that what they're doing is somehow protected by the First Amendment and we're somehow hypocrites by saying they shouldn't be allowed to do it.
No, you are not protected by the First Amendment to go up and physically engage with federal agents while they are carrying out constitutional activity.
Flat out, you're just not.
And it's really sad again that I need to explain any of this.
And I do love to just remind you of that clip from Black Lives Matter, where wasn't it Don Lemon or was it Jake Tapper?
Or it was one of those meathead failures from CNN saying, show me where in the First Amendment it says it has to be peaceful.
And it's like, right there, right there.
The right of the peaceful to the people to peaceably assemble and to petition for redress of grievances.
Not drive your car into ICE agents because you're all hopped up on propaganda.
And in terms of the delusion of the left, we have to recognize this isn't a criticism of them.
Like, I'm not just saying it to put them down.
I'm saying it to warn the non-delusional people that a large portion of this country is operating, again, in a complete fantasy world that unfortunately informs their actions.
They act on their delusions, and that's going to be very dangerous for us and for you in the very near future.
Let's go to clip number 14 here.
As we've seen for the entirety of this year, the Democrats are not shy about what they intend to do when they and if they, but at this point, the way things are going, when they get back in power, they intend to use every form of power that they can get their hands on and that they used during Biden's administration to go after absolutely everybody who either is named Trump,
works with somebody, works for somebody, or followed the orders of somebody named Trump, everybody who was in ICE, everybody who voted for Trump.
I mean, the politicians themselves are just laying it out.
They're going, this is what we plan to do, and we're making lists.
We're collecting lists and we plan to act on them.
And remember, before they'd been driven to these heights of insanity, before they had anything even theoretical to point to as in terms of Trump being a tyrant, not that anything he's doing now is tyrannical, unfortunately, but obviously, you know, the ICE and stuff has had more of an impact this time than it did in his last administration.
The point is that after Trump's first administration, after he didn't do anything to the left and nobody did anything to them, they were still so outraged and so infuriated that they sent thousands of people, innocent people, to jail for years, in some cases putting them in solitary confinement for as long as 36 months on end before they even had a trial.
They put people in jail who weren't even at the event that they were being convicted of helping to participate in or start or inspire.
Do you think that we are going to be safe?
Or do you think that if they get back in power ever again, it will be a simple matter of legal alchemy for them to say, well, you know, he didn't do anything, but he did cover a story that inspired people to be angry.
And then they acted on that, right?
And again, we laid this out in 2020 and 2021, where we said, look, what they're going to do is they're going to say the election wasn't stolen and that people committed violence because the election was stolen.
Therefore, if you say the election was stolen, you're contributing to terrorism.
You're a stochastic terrorist.
You're providing the kindling for the fire of terrorism.
Chris Cuomo, show me where it says the protests are supposed to be polite and peaceful.
If they're not police and peaceful, they're not protests.
It's really not that complicated.
So we've heard the politicians.
We've heard the people actually in power, the people who will, if they win an election, have the authority and the capability to carry out their threats.
But they're slow walking it.
They're slow rolling it.
They're not saying what they really intend, even though what they're saying is insane and should like disqualify them from holding office when they're announcing, yeah, we're going to abuse our power and go after our political enemies if we ever get in power again.
Like how we let these people get away with it is insane.
And these are the politicians.
But the regular people are even crazier and they're saying what they really intend.
And don't for a single second roll your eyes and think that this is just some leftist idiot mouthing off.
It is, but the left is mouthing off in a way that a lot of her compatriots sympathize with.
And a lot of the insane psychotics are like really eager to start going door to door to round up Trump supporters.
That's what they're threatening.
It's not that complicated.
She says they're going to go door to door and round up everybody who voted for Trump.
And she says, look around, look around you, MAGA, and see that everybody hates you and everybody's against you, red hat wearers.
And that they're going to go door to door, you know, asking who you voted for.
I mean, I guess arresting you, sending you to a camp if you don't denounce your support of Trump in the past.
And this is what I mean when I talk about the leftist delusion and the fact that it informs their action.
Trump is not doing anything even remotely close to what she described.
ICE is not doing anything remotely in the same realm as what she described.
They're going after illegal immigrants.
And in most cases, they're going after repeat violent criminals.
And they're arresting them with warrants, treating them nicely, feeding them and housing them and giving them health care and sending them back home.
We are literally so merciful.
I think it's a mistake, actually.
I think we should not be treating them that nicely at all.
And in exchange for literally just enforcing the basic and long, long existing law of this country, these people think an appropriate response is a threatening to go door to door, targeting you, putting you on a list, and I guess killing you or putting you in a camp because you support basic fundamental law enforcement.
So, again, these people who think that they're in Nazi Germany are acting like it.
Let's go to the video now that we have audio.
Thanks, guys.
unidentified
It's going to really suck for the red hats when the shoe is on the other foot and people start going door to door asking if they voted for Trump in the last round or if they still support MAGA.
Oh, I'm sorry.
Did that make you feel threatened?
You think social punishment ain't a thing?
You think everybody's ready to do all this again another 40, 50 years or however long it takes them?
I mean, do they not realize how funny it is that January 6th was never intended by anybody that was there to be anything other than a peaceful protest?
And the only reason it even became violent was because the Capitol Police deliberately started firing flashbangs and rubber bullets into a totally peaceful crowd, starting the entire riot in the first place, and then opened the doors and let people inside.
And they have framed this like an existential crisis, like Civil War 2.0, Pearl Harbor, and 9-11 put together a crisis that almost brought down the country.
You realize we weren't even trying, right?
Like that wasn't our intention.
That was an accident.
We accidentally almost overthrew the country, according to you.
We just like by accident and just like, you know, not even intending to almost apparently killed the entire government and overthrew it and took over completely.
Like, that's what I keep saying.
If this was an insurrection, if the plan from the beginning was for a Trump mob to take over the Capitol, don't you think we would have brought guns?
Can you imagine what that would have looked like if that was really the intention of the people on January 6th?
It would have been a bloodbath and it would have been easy.
I mean, like, we won our battle already, and nobody was intending to even fight, and nobody was going there with any weapons whatsoever.
And these people are still crying about it five years later, and then they're like trying to mock us, be like, January 6th was your big thing.
No, January 6th was supposed to be a party, and it got a little out of hand.
And you people have been crying about it for five years ever since.
You realize how pathetic you are.
Maybe we should actually try.
Maybe we should actually show up next time in a real way.
We'll see.
We'll see how cocky you are.
Point is: go to clip number three here.
She says, look around.
If you had any critical thinking skills, you'd realize how outnumbered you are.
Yeah, sometimes I like blunt questions because they sort of get at the underlying feelings that people have.
So this is about as blunt a question as you can get.
Deport all immigrants here illegally.
I will note the ABC News poll asked about undocumented immigrants.
So we have slightly different questions, but these were all taken within the last month.
And there's real uniformity here.
That's what I really think you see.
You see real uniformity.
Deporting all immigrants who are here illegally, 55% of the New York Times.
Marquette, 64%.
CBS News, 57%.
ABC News with a slightly different question, 56%.
So what you're seeing essentially here is very clear indication that a majority of Americans, in fact, when they're asked this blunt question, which I believe gets at the underlying feelings, do in fact want to deport all immigrants who are here illegally.
There's no arguing with these different numbers because they're all arguing with the numbers, all of them sizably over 50%.
And yet you have leftists who think that it's 90% on their side because all they consume is media that repeatedly reinforces that utterly fake concept.
That utterly wrong idea they have.
They fully and firmly believe, and it makes them think that they're in the majority.
It makes them act as if they're in the majority, which exposes who they really are, which should give the actual majority all the impetus we need to defeat these people forever and not give them a ounce of sympathy.
If some remember on that day that when I got arrested on January 4th, I was sued also for burning, well, not burning a Black Lives Matter banner, but for a Black Lives Matter banner.
Come to find out it's not even the one that was burned.
Then I said, you know what?
I'm going to fight this case.
It's going to be the easiest thing to beat.
Apparently not.
They put me in prison for January 6th.
I couldn't fight this case.
The judge defaults me.
And now, in one of her rulings, she wanted me to give up my cell phone as in order to get discovery about my finances or whatnot.
And yeah, I'm not giving up my cell phone, Harrison.
I'm not giving up my cell phone.
I know exactly how this works.
It happened to me before, right?
They get the cell phone.
They start picking off like regular Joes and they put them in prison.
I am not giving up my cell phone.
I'd rather go to prison or jail for however long.
They could hold me indefinitely until I give up the cell phone.
I'm telling you right now, I'm not giving up the cell phone.
This is at least five, six years old, this case, right?
Because unless I'm mistaken, there was the church right outside of the White House that Antifa tried to burn and it like almost went up in flames.
They started a giant fire there.
Then in response to that, the church put up a giant banner of Black Lives Matter, which is crazy on the face of it.
Somebody tries to burn your church down and you immediately start advertising for them.
It seems like some like terrorism hostage situation.
And then that banner got torn down.
They charged you with it, put you in jail on January 4th, 2021.
So you were in prison for that banner being destroyed, the banner that was put on the church they tried to burn down during January 6th.
And then they arrest you for January 6th as part of an unspoken conspiracy and throw you in jail for two decades.
You get pardoned by Trump.
Now you're out in this banner burning situation from before January 6th, 2021 comes back and they say, we need your phone now, your current phone now, for what you're accused of five, six years ago.
I think you're exactly right about what they intend to do with it if they get their hands on that.
And yet again, we see a default judgment come into play when it's absolutely inappropriate.
What was the excuse they gave you for why you got a default judgment?
Because people don't understand.
Default judgment means you aren't really able to defend yourself against the claim.
So even though they accused you of doing something to a banner at a church that you'd never been to and did nothing about, you're still considered guilty or whatever the term is.
You are now responsible for the punishment against you, even though they never had to present evidence and you never got a chance to argue your case.
No, that the whole thing is so unbelievably insane.
Again, there's some confusion, I guess, about the banner, but you were you were in jail for like, you know, intent to burn or burning with an intent to terrorize or something.
And basically, if you, if something catches on fire during a protest, they can slap you with like terrorist charges years later.
Same thing they did with the Charlottesville marchers who had torches because they had Tiki torches.
They said the TT torch is on fire, therefore you are burning with intent to cause terror.
Really, it's supposed to be like if you, if somebody burns down a black church in the South or, you know, firebombs the home of a person that moves into a neighborhood to try to scare them away, but they use that in order to get terrorists convicted.
And I want to request the InfoWars watcher to reach out to me if they see it.
So this same law firm in January of last year, there was a settlement reach with Donald Trump himself.
And it had to do with lawfare, the weaponization of the Paul Weiss firm, because they're also right now representing the Capitol Police officers and the members of Congress in another lawsuit that me and Donald Trump are on for the events of January 6th.
So like, I know that there was a settlement there.
If anybody could find that settlement and send it over to me, I believe that they are in breach of the settlement.
We need to start weaponizing ourselves, just like the left is, against these law firms that use these tactics and they have unlimited resources.
Let's start with that.
But we need to start fighting fire with fire.
And that's why I grew tired of it.
We're planning on a couple of offensive lawsuits.
We were the first ones to sue the United States government for January 6th.
The government had a very bad time in court about two weeks ago.
Very, very bad time.
The judge agreed with us that it seems like there is a constitutional breach in our case.
So we're going to be able to depose now these FBI agents.
Whoa.
But this is actually the first time I say it because we went to court and we've been quiet about it.
So actually on this show is the first time I say it.
I mean, I'm shocked because that sounds like a court has made a reasonable determination in the year 2026.
That's blowing my mind.
Because obviously, I mean, it is so overwhelming from what you've described today.
But anybody that looks into the Proud Boys, the Oath Keepers, Joe Biggs, the things they did to you, the way they manipulated the system was the most egregious I've ever seen.
And there's been a lot, but from Harry Dunn and the other guy lying about where they were, I mean, we don't need to go through it right here, but so you're suing them for this, and a judge actually has recognized the obvious flagrant violations of your constitutional rights.
I don't want to jump the gun on it, but it seems that way.
The fact that we're getting to the discovery phase in this case is actually surprising for a lot of people.
Yeah.
Including myself.
I thought that, you know, as a person that doesn't trust the justice system, including the judges, it was surprising.
So it is a monumental step, not just for us, for other J Sixers right now that should inspire you.
If you're a J Sixer and watching this, I think you should take the plunge.
Sue the federal government.
Sue the United States of America, I think, is because pardons aren't enough.
And mind you, Joe Biggs is not pardoned.
He's commuted.
So we're working on that now.
But also getting our lives back is really important.
And getting recovering those losses in three years.
My business, the reason why I'm broke right now is because my businesses were destroyed.
I had to sell, I had to sell property.
I had to, my family had to mortgage their house to pay for attorneys.
So right now, what we're doing, look, I don't, I, I, one thing you to those that know me is that I hate fundraising.
I hate crowdfunding.
I hate like, I hate it with a passion.
You know, and like today, my attorney's like, look, you need to, you need to fundraise.
There's no, there's no if, ands, or buts about it.
So for the first time, I started a give send go that is for attorneys' fees to not only to defend myself against fucking going to jail, um, but also go on the offense on these cases.
So it's givesendgo.com/slash weaponization.
Um, because I'm, I'm ready.
I'm done.
I'm done fighting.
I'm done.
I'm done like sitting back.
Um, well, I've never sat back, but we need to start going on the offense and we got to play fight fire with fire.
Look, in 2029, on January 20th, 2029, it's most likely, I hope not, but if they steal the election again and the liberals take power, how long before they put Donald Trump in chains, and I'd say less than 60 days, and then the rest of us are going to follow suit.
They're going to do the opposite.
They started with like trust people that just like walked into the Capitol and then they moved their way last minute to the president.
No, they're going to do the opposite this time.
They're going to lock him up because he was he was a great voice for Jay Sixers.
He was the voice for Jay Sixers.
And then they're going to start locking us up.
They're going to take down Alex.
They're going to take down you.
They're going to take down me and the viewers.
You watching.
You think it can't happen to you?
I thought it couldn't happen to me a couple years ago.
And I was in solitary confinement for three years.
Dude, I honestly, I don't know how you guys continue to operate under all this pressure.
I mean, I guess you just have to, but it's absolutely brutal what they've done to you.
And I think you do deserve some compensation for what you've been through at the very least.
And if you got to launch lawsuits to do it, then that's the way you got to do it.
The Paul Weiss law firm, they did it to us.
It's a similar tactic.
They're doing to Mike Lindell.
Same thing, default judgments.
They default judgment you on something they accuse you of and have no ability to prove that you did, but it doesn't matter because you're a default judgment.
Now you apparently owe them $3.1 million and they want access to all the information on your phone.
I mean, this is outrageous.
It has to be in the purview of the DOJ to do something about this.
And by the way, I remember the Paul Weiss agreement they made with Trump.
It was mostly just about Trump.
And in exchange, they offered like $40 million pro bono services to like write anti-Semitism laws to get passed in the books.
So yeah, the whole thing is ridiculous.
And obviously the Trump administration didn't include folks like Alex Jones or yourself in the clauses there.
So again, gibsongo.com slash weaponization.
Thanks for joining us.
I wish there was more we could do.
What can people do?
What do you want people to know about how this is going and what they can do to help you?
I mean, I think just the link in the bottom, if you could help us out, you know, it's not, if you got like 10 bucks, five bucks, it doesn't matter because if we fund this and we win, just like this, this, we self-funded our offensive lawsuit against the United States government.
We self-funded it completely.
We didn't ask the public for a single dime and it's looking like we're winning, right?
So give us the tools available so we can fight back.
And another thing, keep me out of prison in jail.
I think it's really important.
And I think that that's the way that we move forward and we finally get some justice because, again, we're not seeing, look, I called on, I don't know.
I don't want to play politics and be, oh, she did it.
She did it.
You know, I call on the civil rights division of the DOJ to do something about this because it hasn't stopped.
Look into them.
Look into them.
Harmee Dylan, look into them.
The civil rights, the entire civil rights team for the DOJ, what do we hire you for?
We need you on our side because you think Harmeet Dylan is not going to get persecuted against in the next administration?
They will.
They will put you in chains, Armit.
So I'm asking you, step in, not only on this, on many other issues.
I don't care about Don Lemon.
I hope he gets locked up, but that's not the one that we should worry about.
And there's one thing the Trump administration does.
They do respond to outrage.
So tweet this out, y'all.
Tag Trump, tag Pam Bondi, tag Harmy Dylan.
It's not just a worthless act.
They'll actually move if they see how many Americans are pissed off that they're still going after Enrique Charia following on X at NobleOne.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Second hour of the war room is on.
We got a lot to cover this hour before we welcome Joel Webbin into the studio in the third hour.
But I want to do something here to again highlight, illustrate, attempt to make sense of the delusion of the left.
I know.
You don't want to hear it, but I got a bet.
I got an example here that I think is very potent.
Let's go to clip 30.
This is a very popular content creator on X going around UCLA, one of the top colleges in the country, asking their, you know, the studious academics who live and work there what they think about slavery.
First of all, it doesn't even make sense because the whole indoctrination thing was called the 1619 project.
So he's late for the propaganda anyway.
1700.
Now, if you really asked him a follow-up question, I doubt he truly believes it's 1700, by which I mean if you said to him, you don't think the ancient Romans had slaves, he'd probably say, no, of course the ancient Roman had slaves.
Maybe UCLA is worse than I thought, but I would expect the average person in UCLA would at least know that Rome had slaves, right?
And they would probably know that Rome existed before 1700.
But in his mind, that wasn't slavery, slavery.
See, there's like slavery, the concept that sure that's been around forever.
But then there's slavery TM, right?
There's slavery, which it started in the 1700s, was created by Europeans.
They kidnapped African people.
They got this brilliant idea all of a sudden to try to take people from their homes and work them.
And they came up with this and it lasted for like a couple centuries.
And then probably some sort of big-hearted person of color came along and taught us all how wrong it was.
And we fought, but they freed themselves.
Like that's what they believe.
It's insane.
It is genuinely and utterly and completely insane.
I'm at UCLA to ask students about their knowledge of the history of slavery.
And the reason I'm doing this is because I have a hypothesis that people have a very selective understanding of the history of slavery and the West's role in it.
So approximately, when did slavery start?
unidentified
So like it started ever since people came to be.
People have always wanted to separate other people from power and domination.
I feel like that has been like here since forever.
Like, an institution was already somewhat present there, and then they just kind of took over that as an institution being the dominant power, being that they had like, you know, guns and whatnot.
unidentified
I never thought about that.
I don't know.
I mean, I would say it was by force.
I think they were already caught and sold by other people in Africa.
I wonder if we could find that where he's like, you know, Koreans didn't have slavery like you Europeans.
And then they look it up and the Wikipedia entry is like, Korea has the longest running history of slavery in the entire world.
And it's not that these people are just wrong.
They have been deliberately misinformed.
People have lied to them on purpose to make them think this because they want to demonize European and white people because the reality is the inversion.
White people ended slavery and they want you to be slaves.
So they're demonizing the people that ended slavery.
To me, the funniest part is that the unity goes, you guys are scumbags.
It's like, what, for participating in a human institution that's been around as long as we've walked on two feet?
But that's how these people feel.
It's like, you dirtbag Europeans.
It's like, what?
We arrived latest to the slavery game.
We were the victims of slavery for way longer than we ever held slaves.
But even that, I mean, everybody in Europe was a serf.
So it's just a different form of slavery.
I mean, everybody in the world, more or less, was a slave to one degree or another until America.
And we actually freed everybody, even in their own hearts and minds, to a crazy degree.
I always talk about the Patrick O'Brien series, Master and Commander.
There's one where they pick up an American sailor, and it's just hilarious because this is right after the American Revolution.
All the British sailors are going, but who's your master?
Like, who do you serve?
And the guy's like, no one.
And they're like, who tells you what to do?
And he's like, no, nobody tells me what to do.
Nobody tells me what to do.
Nobody controls me.
Nobody can forbid me from going wherever the hell I want.
I don't have to get permission from anybody to live or do whatever the hell I want.
It's called freedom.
And America was the first country since Rome.
And even then, it's debatable.
But like to codify this, to allow everybody else was the subject of somebody.
Everybody else had a king.
And usually had a couple levels between you and the king of people who could kill you if they wanted, who had your life in their hands at any moment.
America broke that, and the British ended slavery by force, sacrificing tens of thousands of their own men in order to end that despicable, hateful, heinous, and unimaginably damaging institution.
And then we get blamed for it.
And then people at UCLA think that Europeans invented slavery out of whole cloth.
Everybody else was just hanging out singing kumbaya before those gosh darn Europeans decided to invent evil, right?
Whole thing is outrageous.
Although, I have to say, the UK, perhaps, perhaps these days doesn't have that same fervor for liberty that it once did back in the day.
Remember those evil Europeans, those evil 17th century colonial British.
You know, they were the ones that were going around spending their time, treasure, and very lives ending slavery for people who they never met and would never benefit from.
And they were the bad guys that you're supposed to demonize and hate.
They were all evil patriarchy lovers, right?
Not the current UK leadership.
They're the good guys.
They're the loving people.
They're the liberals.
They know better than those old colonial anti-slavery Navy men.
But they don't love freedom quite so much.
They're not out there sacrificing themselves for the liberty of others in a selfless and heroic way.
They are, in fact, imprisoning their own people in a gigantic dystopian hell world prison scape for which there is no escape, even in your mind.
It is truly wild what the UK is doing as they are speed running dystopia these days.
Yeah, here you go.
Some of the loving Koreans and their involuntary helpers, or however they would phrase it.
But I got to talk about the UK.
There's a lot of news in America, but I'm not about to spend another show just pointing out the obvious, okay?
We're moving on.
We're pointing out other obvious things from overseas.
Basically, the UK is in a very real way speedrunning dystopia and frantically tearing down every pillar of liberty that exists in their country.
And they're doing it in a way that is unconscionable and inexplicable, really, if you look at the current situation of that island.
They aren't even really trying to justify what they're doing.
They're just sort of doing it.
And they're basically the excuses that they are giving are of their own creation.
They've really got the whole problem reaction solution thing down to a fine science.
See, They bring in the Muslims that cause the rape gangs and the murders and clog up the NHS.
So they cause that problem.
Then, if you go out and protest it, they come and arrest you.
They cause the outrage, then they arrest you for being outraged.
Then they say, We're arresting so many people for being angry at the other thing that we did that now we don't have time to subject them to jury trials.
We don't have time to apply due process and give them a chance to participate in the storied tradition, the millennial-long practice of common law in Britain to defend themselves in a trial.
There's no time, there's too many people.
The jails are too full.
We better release the murderers because we've got to make room for the people who tweeted stuff about all of the rapists that we led into the country.
I mean, they caused the problem.
The solution is elimination of your rights.
It is like perfect.
Like, there's no, there's no inefficiency to be found.
They cause the outrage, then they throw you in prison for being outraged.
They throw so many people in prison for being outraged that they say our prison, our system can't handle this.
You can now be thrown in prison for up to three years and never be able to fight the charges by judges that have now taken on the 12-man jury trial that's been a fixture of British jurisprudence for damn near say millennia.
But they're going farther than that.
They are at this moment dividing the ancient city of Oxford into six 15-minute cities straight out of the World Economic Forum, merged with Gaza, basically.
And of course, they're doing it in Oxford, which is one of those places where, you know, they'll show some cave drawing of a Native American.
And it's like, this cave drawing was done in the 1100s.
Like, it's just like so ancient.
Like, see, they had said, meanwhile, Oxford existed in the 1100s.
Meanwhile, Oxford was basically the hogwarts of its time.
They were so unbelievably advanced.
And now they're becoming an open-air prison.
So let's watch this clip.
21.
Oxford already started the conversion project several years ago, and it's now coming to fruition.
Yeah, I mean, they're literally setting up like a dystopian technocratic control system.
Labor opens door to Stalinist 15-minute cities across Britain.
At the same time that they're imposing digital ID, at the same time as they're passing new hate speech laws in the Digital Services Act, at the same time that they're passing incredible surveillance laws where they're demanding the right to access your messages before you send them by de-encrypting your anything that you use to communicate with each other at the same time that they're demanding ID to look at the internet,
basically, at the same time that they're getting rid of jury trials, at the same time that they're flooding the country with tens of millions of hostile foreigners, at the same time that they're trying to start a war with Russia.
Does any of this sound like a country that even is trying to continue existence in the next century?
It is only going to get worse, I guess is a way to put it.
And it's already unbelievably bad.
Here's an example.
Holly England was arrested shortly after posting this picture.
I had the pleasure of meeting Holly last week.
She's concerned about, she's just a concerned mother who wants what's best for her community.
So here's a picture of Holly being arrested.
Here's the picture that she posted.
It says, this is why we do what we do, my babies.
And it's two children wrapped in a union jack and a St. George flag, the flag of England.
And it says, protect our children and their future.
She was arrested for this image, folks.
A woman in the UK has now been arrested for posting a picture of children wrapped in a British flag with the subtitle, Protect Our Children and Their Future.
So you're telling me that a simple expression of caring about your children is an arrestable offense in the UK.
I guess if it combines with nationalistic impulses, which is crazy anyway, because it's literally the flag of their country.
You may have read Holly England has been arrested.
If you can bring that back up, if there's more information about this, by the Essex Police UK.
After we finished in Crowborough, this is MMAPX, drove up to Epping to visit the Bell Hotel.
Holly did pick up the microphone, said a few words, none of which I remember being inflammatory.
She's a mother of four, and her youngest is a daughter aged about five to six, who's absolutely adorable.
She held my hand across the road.
Well, she's wrapped in a British flag.
I guess the mom gets arrested.
Sorry, four-year-old, sorry to traumatize you by taking your mother away in handcuffs, but she wants to protect you.
So that's illegal, I guess.
So let's go to some of these videos because they just mentioned Crowborough.
Clip number 33 here is a report about what is being done.
Now, they've already done this in Ireland quite a bit.
They're doing it in the UK now.
The UPK basically flooded their country with so many migrants.
They've filled all of the hotels.
They've filled all of the housing centers that they're building with millions of dollars or buying from their foreign owners in order to house migrants.
But now they're doing what they were doing in Ireland, which is building or re-configuring literal military barracks to house their soldiers in, soldiers of the New World Order.
The 500 to 600 male, adult, fighting age Africans and Middle Easterners are now being housed in a disused military barracks, despite absolutely everyone in the town being dead set against it.
Here I am right outside Crowborough Barracks, where last night 27 single male migrants were moved in without the community's knowledge.
Now there are residents that are absolutely infuriated by this move.
The Labor government intends to put over 500 people in these barracks behind here.
Some people from the Conservative government said that they moved out 6,000 people from the military in order to make this clear for the illegal migrants.
There's a lot of activity, a lot of vans going through, a lot of resources being put into this community now for some reason or other.
The locals were furious and they actually marched.
That's what the video that we were just showing you was.
Clip 34, well done to lovely people of Crowborough, saying no to the implementation of this literal colony of foreign warriors in their land.
Here they are marching with the St. George flag, the Union Jack, and others.
Again, exactly what they did in Ireland.
Now, it seems like the UK is actually being slightly less aggressive with the protesters in Ireland.
They would send out the Garde, the federal police, to abuse, hit with sticks, drive out of the way any protesters trying to block the importation, like block the vans bringing the invaders in.
You have the national government, the native security of the land, actively fighting their own people to bring in foreigners, to force foreigners into their community.
And it's happening all over Europe to a massive degree.
And now they're taking it that step farther in the UK.
And the people in the UK are not happy about this.
They're asking questions about it, questions that the authorities in the UK do not intend to answer, have no answers for, and refuse to acknowledge the implications of the fact that they have no answers for this.
And it's clip 29 here, a very pertinent and important question that, again, the authorities don't want to answer.
I think I just said because they don't have it.
They actually do have an answer.
They actually know exactly what the answer is.
And it's actually the reason these men are being brought.
You'll see what I mean.
The question is about, well, you're bringing in 500 adult men.
How are you going to deal with their sexual needs?
Let's watch.
unidentified
Two ladies at the back.
So first.
Yeah.
How do you plan to meet the sexual needs of 600 men?
The answer to that question is your wives and daughters is the actual answer.
That's how they end.
And he's like, I didn't, I don't.
Like, he's almost like, you know, offended at the idea that he would be expected.
Well, you provided their food.
You provided their housing.
I mean, there's a hierarchy of needs and sexual activity is, you know, could be pretty high up there.
You're bringing 500 men.
You didn't bring 500 women.
So you expect those 500 men to find partners in the local community that doesn't want them there.
And already has been.
Thank you very much.
And the disdain that the guy has.
Well, I'm not going to do it.
I'm not going to satisfy them.
No, you're just voluntaring the local community to be raped by them.
That's the purpose of it.
Of course, this is about diluting the gene pool of the UK, of all of Europe.
It's an attack on white people to exterminate white people.
Do we not understand this yet?
Not to kill them, to breathe them out of existence.
That is the deliberate, obvious, readily apparent purpose of this agenda.
Why else would you bring 500 foreign men into a population and then say, I don't know how they're going to get sexual satisfaction?
I guess that's up to you.
I mean, has there ever been anything in the history of the world that is as evil as the modern UK?
Like Genghis Khan would take a bunch of captured prisoners and lay them down and then put boards on top of them and kill them by having a party on top.
Like he'd build a dance floor on top of his prisoners to crush them to death while having a feast on top.
I think he would shudder at what the UK is currently doing.
I think you could take the most evil people from all of history and none of them were engaged in the systematic, deliberate elimination of not just a person or a group of people,
but a race of people, a history, a culture that's lasted for 2,000 years is being deliberately jackhammered and a million British girls have been raped by these people who then covered it up and will send you to jail for speaking out against it or even referencing that you have children that you care about and don't want to see killed.
I genuinely don't know if there's an example of history of a more cold-hearted and ruthless cabal of evil than that currently runs Europe overall.
It is so unbelievably vicious.
And again, they are supercharging this and weaponizing this in so many different ways.
They're not only killing you and destroying you and bringing in your daughter's future rapists as they laugh at your concerns.
They're going to make it illegal for you to be mad at that, to disagree with that, or to otherwise campaign against the deliberate destruction.
Labor opens door to Stalinist 15-minute cities across Britain.
Ministers have said they will allow counsels to use driver's license databases to impose fines on drivers who fall foul of traffic filters which restrict driving in certain areas.
Jury trials scrapped for crimes with sentences of less than three years.
AI and facial recognition to be rolled out as Britain's broken policing system faces sweeping reforms.
And that's on top of the digital ID and it's on top of the immigration system overall and the hate speech crap that they throw into the mix every couple of years.
And if the people of UK, of the UK don't wake up in the next year or so, I think that's going to be it for y'all.
I think that's really going to be it.
And I think at the heart of everything the UK government is doing to its own people is a deep-seated, crushing fear of the average person that they have.
They're trying to destroy you before you rise up.
So you should rise up.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
We'll be joined by Joel Webbin in the next segment.
I do want to remind you that we have a new product that we just launched that I know people have been wanting.
It's Mind Fuel.
It's the berry flavor of Mind Fuel by Optimal Human.
If you've tried Optimal Human, you know their products are the real deal.
The green drink is one of my favorite products on the AlexJonesStore.com.
Mind Fuel is the new nootropic energy shot.
No caffeine, no sugar, just long-lasting energy nootropic power.
Comes in this box with a bunch of individual shots that, you know, I don't know if people enjoy these little anecdotes, but sometimes we get new products and everybody in the office just steals them.
Everybody in the office just takes them.
So we've had to have a big family meeting about don't drink the mind fuel shots.
We all love them.
We all want to drink all of them, but we have to have some available to advertise and to show and to take pictures of.
So I've been told I'm not allowed to drink this, which is okay.
You know, rather, I should say they've requested that I don't.
And so I'm complying with that, but I want one.
They're very good, and we're not allowed to drink them.
We have to buy them ourselves.
And so you can buy them too, the AlexJonesStore.com.
But I'm telling you folks, we don't sell things that we ourselves don't enjoy.
We don't sell you things that don't work because we take everything that we sell.
And all around the office, all around the studio, everybody's got their own little collection of supplements.
I know I have mine.
I just ran out of power plant, need to re-up on that.
And, you know, maybe a box of mind fuel will go missing.
We don't know.
We can't be everywhere all the time.
But I'm telling you folks, it's very good.
And it's so good that we literally had to tell everybody, including me, please stop drinking the mind fuel energy shots.
We're trying to sell them, not to consume all of them.
Okay.
A lesson we could take from drug dealers, I guess.
Don't get high on your own supply.
But we can't help it because our products are actually amazing and we love them and we want you to love them.
So we give you to them at we give them to you at a massive discount and with extra bonuses.
Right now, if you get mind fuel, you get a free atomic defense bottle of supplements for absolutely free.
So go to the alexjonesstore.com, get yourself some mind fuel, get a free bottle of atomic defense while you're at it.
And also, there's massive discounts on tons of products like the t-shirts and hoodies are 25% off.
Ultramethylene blue capsules and tincture are 35% off, as well as the Shilajit gummies and capsules, the Ultra DNA Revival, NAD Plus, the PowerPlant, the Methyl Drive, and MKUltra, all of those up to 35% off today.
Go to the AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison if you want to let them know who sent you.
And with that, let's return to the dystopian state of not just the UK or Europe, but the entire Anglosphere, the European diaspora around the world is under concerted attack right now in a lot of different ways.
In particular, Australia seems to be a playground for the new world order, seems to be a testing ground for new and tyrannical measures of censorship and anti-gun laws and all sorts of things that would work fine if the government wasn't actively importing tens of thousands of hostile foreigners at the same time.
And they've recently passed a new hate crime law that is setting new standards in terms of ridiculous, outrageous, easily misused anti-free speech laws.
And the whole thing has been outrageous.
The whole thing has been a saga of absurdity, but we're reaching new heights of this absurdity.
Let's go to clip 35 here.
This is a man at an Australia Day celebration, their equivalent of Independence Day, July 4th.
It's called Australia Day.
And a man went up and gave a speech about the new hate speech laws, which of course only apply to certain people and not others.
Certain acts of hate, not others.
Certain religious groups have carve-outs while others don't.
And of course, I could show you videos.
I can't show them to you because they're not bleeped right now, but I can show you videos of, you know, white Australians just being ruthlessly abused, both physically being stabbed at Australia Day for waving an Australian flag.
I guess I can show you that one.
We can just keep the audio down.
But obviously, the native European diaspora Anglo-Australians who founded and built and run the country are under constant attack, political attack, lawfare types of attack, as well as just actually being attacked and just the psychological terrorism that they're constantly faced with.
So a young man went up and gave a speech at Australia Day talking about the source and the initiative behind the new hate speech law that has essentially just criminalized white Australians defending themselves.
So let's watch the speech at Australia Day.
Here it is.
unidentified
Go ahead, mate.
I need to drag on for a few minutes.
I'll say it quickly.
The fact is that all these politicians that came up here spoke about bravery, all that bullshit, because they don't know what it means.
They came up here, gave you a bunch of words, but none of them called out the fact that the hate speech laws were pushed by the Australian, the Jewish lobby groups in Australia.
He's been thrown in prison for a speech that he gave.
Joel Davis is being denied any reading material.
He's not even being allowed a Bible.
He's given no radio, no nothing.
He's in solitary confinement and has been there for like months at this point and will be there indefinitely.
And again, they aren't even giving him books, not allowing him phone calls, actually torturing this guy brutally.
Meanwhile, the man who committed a mass murder and killed over a dozen people on Bandi Beach is being given access to religious material.
He gets to go visit a prayer room with a cleric.
He gets a Quran in his room.
Now, the man who just gave that speech was immediately arrested, man charged after allegedly making comments, aligned with neo-Nazis at an Australia Day celebration.
Aligned with neo-Nazis.
Why?
Because he said it was the Jewish lobby in Australia that got the hate speech passed.
It absolutely, incontrovertibly was.
That's not a debate.
You're just not allowed to say it.
They are.
And I'll show you the clip of them bragging about it, but you can say it if you like it and you're in favor of it and you're congratulating and thanking the Jewish community for passing the hate speech law.
It's good.
It's fine that you acknowledge that they're the source of it.
If you don't like that, now you're a neo-Nazi and you get arrested the minute you step off stage.
And I believe we have a video of that.
I think it's clip 23 or 20, yeah, 23 here is that man minutes after giving the speech, being arrested.
There he is.
And have you ever seen a more appropriate image of the modern West or rather modern Australia?
Especially I saw the original picture was just him and the officer on the left, who is significantly smaller and less physically intimidating than him.
But of course, the Australian dutifully complies to the laws of the land and is shoved into a box for an indefinite period of time for daring to acknowledge the role the Jewish community played in passing the hate speech laws.
Now, you can like the hate speech laws, dislike the hate speech laws.
You can like the Jewish diaspora lobbying community or not.
It is undeniable where the hate speech laws came from.
It's not even like having to like connect dots.
The Jewish organizations in Australia wrote the law, lobbied for the law, got their corporate partners to threaten boycotts to get the law passed for six months before the Bondi Beach massacre.
Then a Muslim guy shoots up Bondi Beach and what do you know, the anti-Semitism law passes does absolutely nothing to do anything.
It does absolutely nothing to stop the Bondi Beach massacre or the people who carried it out or anything like that.
It is entirely focused on shutting down people like that.
People giving speeches saying, hey, guys, I'm a white Australian, this hate speech law that everybody's railing against.
Why is nobody telling you who wrote the law and got the law passed, the Jewish lobby?
And then they arrest him for that.
Why?
Why do we allow this?
Why are we so cowed by this phrase anti-Semitism that we can't say the truth, just say what everybody knows to be true?
And if you think it's bad that the Jews are behind the censorship law, then you should be against it.
Like, what are you talking about?
If it's a good thing they passed it, then what's the problem with acknowledging that?
This is so inconsistent and wild.
And again, it may be different if there was some sort of connecting the dots, a couple degrees of separation.
Well, the Jewish community wanted it and it passed.
That doesn't mean that they're responsible for it.
But this isn't speculation.
Let's go to clip eight now.
This is head of the ADL, Jonathan Greenblatt, as well as the head of the J7, which is a consortium of representatives of the seven largest Jewish diaspora communities.
So you have big Jewish diaspora communities in America and Brazil and Australia, and they all have representatives, I guess, that appoint themselves or are appointed, who then use their influence in whatever realm of profession they operate in to push for world leaders to make changes to their constitution to benefit the Jewish people and to silence their critics.
That's what they do.
That's what they talk about doing.
And here they are explaining to you the process that they went through to get this hate speech law passed.
Now, just last week, leaders of the world's seven largest Jewish communities convened in Australia as part of the 2025 J7 summit.
This is a summit organized by ADL as part of the J7 task force to combat anti-Semitism, a convening of representative bodies of the largest Jewish communities on earth.
So the J7, as I said, as we said, is comprised of the seven largest diaspora communities.
We meet every other week via Zoom to share information, to share best practices.
We share what worked for our communities, what hasn't worked, what might work elsewhere.
We have shared tips or draft legislation that might work in other countries or spoken of different litigation.
A lot of what has been very important has been this consultation where we can learn from each other, learn the trends that are coming in, learn the techniques that others have used successfully, and what might be coming our way.
Because what happened in Montreal could happen in Melbourne, and what happens in New York or London or Paris will make its way to Buenos Aires.
That's number one.
Number two, we do speak in one voice in certain aspects on key advocacy.
So for example, when we left Australia, our call to action was on the Australian government to move forward the special envoy, Jillian Siegel's plan on anti-Semitism, which has been stalled for a number of months, to accept it and to implement it.
It was significant that the leaders of the seven largest diaspora communities went to Australia to show solidarity publicly with the community, with government leaders and the media, and also make this joint call to action.
Finally, we have meetings that are some off the record, some on the record with world leaders in which we share our communities' concerns and call for action.
So it's both a really important body for consultation and learning from each other, as well as an effective tool when we can come together and speak in one voice.
So what she just described in layman's terms is an international Jewish conspiracy to use their international power to pressure sovereign national governments to silence their critics.
Okay, I mean, that is what she said.
So are you not allowed?
You're not allowed to say that, though?
She just said it.
You're not allowed to be against it.
You're not allowed to say it in a way that sounds like you're angry.
You have to say it in a positive way.
If he'd given that same speech and said thank you to the Jewish community and the lobbyists for passing this lovely and necessary hate speech law, maybe that wouldn't have been against the law, but because he was not happy when he said it, it is.
The point is that these laws are entirely arbitrary.
They don't actually mean they're just a legal framework excuse to silence critics of the power structure.
It is beyond simple to understand.
And of course, it's not just Australia.
It's happening in every country.
And there is this concerted effort.
Benjamin Nanyahu calls it the eighth front war.
I'm working on a very sizable report about this right now, but we've seen some updates to it because we've been hearing for a while.
And let me just put a cap on it.
Just to remind you, that woman was not talking in the past tense about a Bandi massacre.
All of that happened last summer, months before the Bandi massacre ever occurred.
So you had this massive international Jewish cabal that was working with the anti-Semitism czar, whatever their equivalent is in Australia to write laws censoring Australians from criticizing the country of Israel, their practices or anything.
And then for six months, they fight for this, try to get it passed.
They don't get it passed because it is an obvious and flagrant violation of the fundamental beliefs about free speech that Australians still hold as a holdover from their Anglo history.
And not until the massacre at Bondi Beach did they finally get the political will to pass all of this through, even though it didn't address anything about Bandi Beach.
It provided the traumatic event to suppress all of the concerns about free speech and say, we just need to get this done now.
Oh my God, you don't want another bunch of people to die, do you?
The bill doesn't stop anybody from dying, obviously.
And of course, they have carve-outs for specifically Jewish institutions in Australia that they get to have guns and get more guns, but everybody else in Australia has to turn their guns in.
Totally insane.
Okay, just getting that across the board.
So Benjamin Nanyaho has this eighth front war, and it's actually more in-depth than you think.
The eighth front war, they claim is the information war.
They claim is the war over social media.
In a way, that's true.
But at the same time, Benjamin Nanyahoo is making statements about America being the new Rome and Jerusalem losing against Rome last time, but they have to win the next one.
Okay, so you can put those two dots together, right?
The Eighth Front War is not just a war in cyberspace.
It's not just a war of disinformation.
It's a war against America.
It's a war against America because Benjamin Nyahoo has made multiple speeches in the recent past where he enunciates his ambition for Israel to move from a secondary power on the world stage to a primary power on the world stage.
Again, using Benjamin Nyahoo's own words, it's pretty easy to understand that Israel is waging an eighth front war, a war of information against America in an attempt to both destroy America and upgrade the position of Israel to assume the position that America serves now as hegemon of the world.
Okay, so this is what they're doing.
This is their plans.
And for a couple years at this point, we've heard over and over and over that the most important victory to be achieved is against TikTok.
Not because TikTok is something unique and special other than that it wasn't already built with embedded anti-Semitic anti-Semitism algorithms inside.
Right.
So, again, it's not that TikTok was over and above the popularity of anything else, and it was just that much more important.
But otherwise, like the other outlets, like the other platforms, no, Meta has a censor.
Specifically, she is the minister for Jewish diaspora at the Meta company, and she is in charge of their censorship activity.
And she goes out of her way to do things like define Zionist as anti-Semitic, so that even if you're just protesting or speaking out against the actions of the Israeli government in a secular geopolitical framework, you still will be censored because they'll extrapolate that to mean that you hate the Jews and therefore you can't criticize the actions of a foreign state.
Meta already had that built in.
Elon has been very lenient and conciliatory towards the ADL and allowing them to change the algorithm to suppress post-criticizing Israel.
That was revealed recently with you asked Grok to give your account a score and how the algorithm treats you.
And it was revealed that embedded in the algorithm of X is a score as to whether you are pro-Zionist or anti-Zionist and being pro-Zionist crushes your reach.
Okay, so they're not really worried about X. They're not really worried about Meta and Facebook because they already have them captured and censors, you know, there to silence criticism.
But TikTok was an outlier, and China didn't want to sell them TikTok, and China isn't interested in playing their games.
And so they used the American government, came up with these claims about the Chinese government stealing data or whatever, whatever excuse they need to throw at the wall, just like to get rid of the Harvard president.
They came up with something about plagiarism.
No, it was about fact she allowed anti-Zionists to protest.
You know, the Columbia president just got replaced because he wasn't sufficiently phylo-Semitic.
So he was kicked out.
And the person that replaced him is a die-hard Zionist.
And, you know, her dad is like a famous lifelong, you search her dad's name and it's like 15 different books about Israel.
And it's like his number one thing is like he was suing Hamas and all this stuff.
Anyway, so they got, you know, this is what's happening.
All right.
I'm be against it, be for it.
You can't call me a liar.
This is absolutely what's happening.
It's being done in a coordinated, organized, orchestrated fashion, and it's being done by weaponizing things like the American government's incredible power on the world stage, the incredible sway that we have and leverage that we are able to wield against a opponent like China.
Now, instead of using that power and using that leverage to our own benefit, it's hijacked by Israelis and used to their benefit.
So TikTok is basically forced out of the hands of the Chinese because the Jewish lobby in America convinced Congress to write a law that said they had to do that.
And then who bought it but Larry Ellison or his consortium helped to put it in place.
Now there's a new CEO, CEO, who likewise is following exactly the same trend as the Jewish diaspora chief at Meta and conflating all anti-Zionist sentiment with anti-Semitic sentiment and banning it across the board to the degree that you can't say factual things about Jeffrey Epstein or the Gaza war.
And at this point, it's being discovered you can't even send the name Epstein in a private message.
And this is being reported on by NPR.
TikTok is investigating why some users can't write Epstein in messages.
You're investigating that, are you?
Interesting.
Yeah, I'll go investigate the tweet I put out yesterday.
You wrote it, dummies.
What do you mean you're investigating?
It's the censorship protocol you put into place deliberately.
But they're investigating it.
Officials at TikTok say they're looking into why many users have been unable to send the word Epstein in direct messages, an issue that garnered widespread attention on social media Monday and prompted California Governor Gavin Newsome to announce an inquiry into the matter.
Quote: We don't have rules against sharing the name Epstein in direct messages and are investigating why some users are experiencing issues.
A spokesperson for TikTok's U.S. operation told NPR in a statement.
This comes just days after TikTok finalized a sale.
They gave a consortium of mostly American investors control of TikTok's business in the U.S. a deal that averted a nationwide ban of the app over national security concerns tied to its Chinese parent company.
Among the lead investors is tech firm Oracle, which is run by billionaire Larry Ellison, who is the number one most generous contributor to the IDF.
And of course, you know, part of getting this TikTok deal, America had to make certain sacrifices, like allowing China to send 600,000 students into this country.
That was all part of the economic deal, of which the purchase of TikTok was just a part.
So, yeah, TikTok is now censoring at the best of the U.S. government.
The app is still functionally banned.
Yeah, it's not the U.S. government, but we are going to get blamed.
And Trump is playing the role.
And they are doing it through the American government, using our authority as the leverage to get what they want.
But they already were insinuating themselves into TikTok, and already it had been revealed that factual information from like official sources about Epstein were still being censored because that's what it's always about.
Just like how the UK put in, you know, age controls for the internet because they're like, we don't want kids finding sites that tell them to commit suicide.
And then the first thing they start censoring is reports about a migrant raping or killing a girl.
The Old Testament belongs to Christ and to his Christians, his joint heirs, not to you.
You reject Jeremiah, who promised a new covenant in which God would forgive sin and remember iniquity no more.
You reject Hosea, who proclaimed that God would call his son out of Egypt.
You reject Malachi, who foretold the Lord suddenly coming to his temple, preceded by the messenger who would prepare the way.
You reject Balaam, who foresaw a star and a scepter rising out of Jacob.
And you reject Solomon, who sang of a king whose dominion would be extended to the ends of the earth and that would endure forever.
And you reject Asaph, who proclaimed that God would reject false shepherds and raise up his own chosen king to shepherd faithfully his people in righteousness.
You rejected all the prophets.
You stoned them.
You built tombs and sepulchres to honor them in order to try to whitewash the blood off of your hands.
But you rejected them all then, and you still reject them now.
God does not listen to you.
God does not hear your prayers.
And I am deeply and profoundly sorry that any Christian has dared to imply that we worship the same God because your God is not Yahweh.
Your father is the devil.
Your synagogues are erected in his honor, synagogues of Satan.
I point out that God tires of your feast and rejects all your sacrifices.
But Christ Almighty actually destroyed your temple by divine decree, and you have not offered a single legitimate Jewish act of worship in 1,955 years.
So today, you have a choice.
You can worship your Messiah and bow down to your king, or you can be about tidying Jerusalem and sweeping Israel.
You can care for our holy sites and polish our relics, because one day soon, the Christ whom you crucified is returning to reclaim his earthly home and turn you into a footstool for his feet and to rule over you with a rod of iron.
His first act will be to evict every last unbelieving Jew and Muslim from the Holy Land at the tip of his own sword so as to not solely it with the presence of your unbelief.
Have you not read God spoke through Malachi, declaring that he would reject your sacrifices entirely and take his name to the Gentiles instead?
Have you not read in Jeremiah, who quotes, God promising to tear down a nation that he planted if it persists in evil and to build another if it obeys?
Christians are the children of Abraham, while unbelieving Jews have been cut off.
So while I appreciate your noble effort to lecture Christians about why replacement theology is wrong, I reject the premise that you even believe the Old Testament itself.
For if you did, then you would believe in Christ and joyfully declare that Christ is king.
Yes, folks, that, in my opinion, was a very well-said expression of basic biblical theology.
And the sad thing is, people are outraged at that.
But that is what the First Amendment is for.
You can be outraged, but we can be critical.
On the other side, we get into it with Joel Webbin.
We'll get into everything that was just said and his new book, The Hyphenated Heresy, available now.
Stay with us, folks.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Joel Webbin is my guest.
He's here with me in studio.
His new book is called The Hyphenated Heresy, Judeo-Christianity.
That's the hyphen there in the middle of Judeo and Christianity.
You can follow Joel on X at Joel Webbin on Rumble at NXR Studios and nxrstudios.com.
He is a father, a husband, a pastor who serves at the senior pastor of Covenant Bible Church in Texas.
He's the president and founder of Right Response Ministries, where he produces daily content focused on biblical teaching, theology, and cultural issues.
Of course, you also gaslight as a right word, moonlight.
moonlight as a incredibly controversial public figure, even though what you're saying in that video is a great example seems to me like perfectly in line with basic Christian theology.
Well, I think there's a lot of people at the theological, religious level that essentially they assume that Judaism, modern Judaism, is Christianity simply minus the New Testament.
So they think that, well, yeah, we have differences and Christians worship Jesus and Jews don't, but Judaism out of all these other religions aside from Christianity would be the closest to Christianity.
So it's a lot of evangelical Protestant Christians, they acknowledge Judaism is not Christianity, but it's the closest.
Whereas I would argue that in many regards, it's actually the furthest.
Islam is a false religion.
And you can go back 1,400 years of incredible conflicts between Christians and Muslims.
And so I don't want to belittle the problems with Islamic teaching, especially as it pertains to Muslims religiously gaining more and more power here in the United States.
That is a problem.
So I don't want to minimize that.
But the reality is that Islam still esteems Christ.
So they're going to reject his deity.
They're not going to see him as the way, the truth, and the life, as the only begotten Son of God, but still herald him and esteem him as a great prophet, close to, you know, or a similar level to Muhammad himself.
Hinduism has a place for Jesus as esteemed.
Buddhism has a place for Jesus as esteemed.
There's only one major world religion that actually despises Christ, that teaches that Christ is currently burning in hell, that views him as a heretic and a blasphemer and a false teacher, and that is Judaism.
So the best way to think about it is when we read the Old Testament, we're not Marcionites, which is a heresy of really severing the new from the old and reading the New Testament in isolation.
That's your Christian, you know, liberal Christian who, you know, would be like, well, you know, but the red letters of the scripture, you know, say, and what they mean by that is that, you know, whatever Jesus said somehow eradicates everything in the Old Testament, that the Old Testament doesn't even exist anymore.
Well, Jesus never talked about homosexuality.
So therefore, you know, it's on the table.
And that's just not basic Christian theology.
We hold the old and new together.
But the best way to think of it, there's one theologian who said that the Old Testament is like a richly furnished room, but dimly lit, but it can be fully appreciated in the light of the New Testament.
And the way to understand Judaism in comparison to Christianity, Talmudic Judaism, modern Judaism, is that both of us share the Old Testament.
The problem, though, is that they're not just the Old Testament minus the new.
We both have lenses that are placed over the Old Testament to interpret it and understand it.
We have the New Testament, and so we read the Old Testament through the New Testament as our lens.
The Jew will read the Old Testament through the lens of the Talmud.
And what the Talmud does is it doesn't just mean they have the Bible minus the New Testament.
The Old Testament that they have is twisted and perverted and changed by the Talmud, that murky lens that they're reading the Old Testament through.
So what you're left with in Judaism is not half of Christianity, but it's arguably the most hostile world religion to Christianity.
And that would be surprising for a lot of people to hear because I feel like I'm constantly trying to remind people Judaism is not Christianity.
I mean, there seems to, you know, nowadays there's this conflation where to even suggest that these are different religions with different worldviews and therefore different philosophies about what's right and wrong, people seem to not be able to recognize that.
And they, like you said, want to treat Judaism like Christianity minus the New Testament.
But even that phrase is a little absurd, right?
I mean, how do you have Christianity without the New Testament?
That really doesn't make any sense.
So it is something utterly and completely different.
And, you know, we see now the way that Christians in the Middle East and around Israel are being absolutely brutalized by the Israeli regime.
I mean, and they just took over the settler's field, which was the place where the shepherd's field, rather, the settlers took over the shepherd's field, which was the place where the shepherds were greeted by the angel who told them to go find Jesus in the manger.
That is now, you know, a thousand people in that village were just violently expelled and taken over.
So this is like, there's still a real world conflict going on here.
I think that, you know, the average Jewish person, whether they're practicing or not, that's another thing to point out is, you know, people will be quick to say, yeah, but the average Jewish person is not a religiously practicing Jew.
Most of Israel is secular, and I recognize that.
But what I think it's important for people to realize is you can say the same thing about America.
So at this point, it's sad, but we really, as a nation, have apostasized against the Lord Jesus Christ.
And we're not nearly as Christian as we once were.
And yet, at the same time, all these Christian underpinnings are still there.
So you have plenty of people who are never going to darken the door of a church on Sunday morning and don't even, or if they do, it's twice a year.
They're, you know, cultural Christians, something like that.
Many of them won't even profess to be followers of Christ.
And many of them are not truly regenerate.
They're not born again.
They're not Christians in any sense of the term.
And yet there are still cultural aspects in the West, in European countries, in America, that ultimately come from this Christian foundation.
Well, it's the same thing.
Apply that same concept now to Israel.
And you can say, well, 75% of Israelis, you know, Jews living in Israel or Jews here in America, they're not practicing.
They're not religious Jews.
You know, Dave Smith would be an example, you know, something like that.
But what I would say is that in the same way that American culture, even modern present-day culture in America was forged by Christianity, so too, Jewish culture is forged by Judaism.
Whether you acknowledge that or you're practicing or not, there's still the underpinnings that are still there.
And some of those negative implications, I'm not saying that everything is bad about it, but some of the negative implications, the religion of Judaism, the best way to understand it is it is a religion of lawyers, a religion of litigation.
It's all, actually, I'm a big fan of a YouTuber called Ash Mays and him describing it.
And he's sort of defending the Talmud in certain ways because people do, you can find tracts of the Talmud that sound horrible out of context.
And context, it's like, all right, maybe that wasn't quite what they were trying to say.
But I mean, it's, you know, the way he describes this, like, imagine taking, you know, the transcript of legal proceedings for like a whole century in America and saying, this is your holy book now.
You wouldn't know what people believed because some people are making this argument, some people are making this argument.
It's like, do they believe both?
How could they?
So, yeah, I mean, the Talmud is very much a sort of lawyerish conversation about the Old Testament.
It's a meticulous legalistic litigation about the Old Testament.
So when Jesus is constantly in the gospel narratives, Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John, he said, you have heard it was said.
A lot of Christians today, modern evangelical Protestant Christians, are really, at the end of the day, they're anti-nomians.
And what that means, anti-against Nomos law.
They're against the law of God.
So they will read that and they think, oh, see, Jesus is actually contradicting Moses.
Jesus is looking at the law of God that was given by God himself through Moses in the wilderness.
And Jesus is saying, you know, God had a law and Moses said this, but I tell you, but that's a break in the Trinity.
It's as though the Son is somehow against his father.
When Jesus says you have heard it was said, what he's talking about is all the commentary, all the litigation, all the piles and piles of, well, actually, on top of Moses that rabbis had piled up by even his time, much less our time, 2,000 years removed.
So when Jesus says, well, the law said this, but I tell you, what he's saying is that Rabbi so-and-so, according to Rabbi so-and-so, according to Rabbi so-and-so, according to Rabbi so-and-so, in commentating and exegeting Moses, says that the application of this commandment given by God really means X, Y, and Z.
But I tell you, right, when God says through Moses, do not murder, that this includes even murder at the level of the heart, right?
And so Jesus isn't, he's not disagreeing with Moses and therefore God who gave his law through Moses.
Jesus is exegeting Moses.
And what he's comparing and contrasting is his exegesis of Moses versus the Jewish rabbis' exegesis of Moses at that time.
They were essentially what they were trying to do is take the law of God and somehow lessen it, right?
Like if you swear by the temple, you're fine.
But if you swear by the gold of the temple, then you're bound by your oath.
Essentially, imagine a group of adult men, lawyers, who are basically coming up with a way of telling your dad, yeah, I'll do that, but nanny, nanny boo-boo, I had my fingers crossed behind my back.
I'm not really obligated.
I'm not really bound.
And Jesus is saying, well, wait a second, is it the gold that makes the temple holy or is it the temple?
And it seems like any just honest reading of the New Testament, of the Gospels, that conclusion is sort of inevitable, right?
I mean, he's not exactly vague about what he's trying to tell people.
And, you know, even well-known parables like the Good Samaritan, right?
He's making the point, like, look, these amazing rabbis who do everything just right and are exalted and holy, are actually less than the guy we're supposed to think is, is trash and, you know, equivalent of cattle, this Samaritan, which was a different racial group than the Jews that they were supposed to be arrayed against.
And here's Jesus going.
Actually he's the better guy because he's actually a decent person, or you know, you do.
All these forms of these ceremonies and the, the actions of the ceremonies, the form of the ceremony, is supposed to just represent the transformation of your heart.
He's saying it's, it's that part that's important.
So it's better that you genuinely feel regret for what you did and not perform the killing of the sacrificial chicken than killing of the sacrificial chicken and not regret.
You know your sin right?
It seems very obvious to me when you read Jesus.
He's directly rebuking the rabbis who are, who are basically saying, as long as you fulfill the function, then it counts, and he's saying no, No, no, no, you have to actually believe this stuff.
The number one word that Jesus uses to describe as an indictment, the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the lawyers, it literally says in the scribes and lawyers, these religious rulers at that time is not legalists.
And this is what people need to understand.
Jesus does not go around to the Pharisees saying, you legalists.
No, he says, you hypocrites.
You're like whitewashed tombs, right?
You're polished and white and clean on the outside, but on the inside, there's a rotting corpse that smells like death.
You clean the outside of the cup, but on the inside, it's filled with germs.
What's the point?
The problem is not that you're too legalistic, that you make too much of the law of God.
The problem is you're actually in direct rebellion to the law of God.
You seem to give it lip service.
You seem to tip the hat in your outward life, but your heart is actually far from the Lord.
And now we have Christians today that look at this and they say, if any Christian pastor is preaching the law of God as though it's relevant and has application for Christians to follow today, he's just like the Pharisees.
He's a legalist.
No, Jesus' problem with the Pharisees was not that they were legalists.
And with that, real quick, the Bible tells us, this is why we need the New Testament and the Old, because the very question that immediately is raised from the golden rule, love your neighbor as you love yourself.
This is one of two.
So Jesus says, Matthew, you know, I believe it's 22 verses, it's towards the latter part of Matthew, it's like four or five verses.
He says, and he said to them, you shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, soul, and mind, or heart, soul, and strength.
This is the first and greatest commandment.
The second is like it, you should love your neighbor as yourself.
But then he finishes by saying, all the law and the prophets, all the Old Testament moral commandments hinge on these two.
So when you look at those two commandments, right, the golden rule being the second greatest commandment, to love your neighbor as yourself, the first, to love God, these two laws that Jesus gives are a summary of the Ten Commandments.
So the question that it should raise is, okay, love the Lord my God with everything, but how?
Commandments number one through four in the Ten Commandments, have no other gods before me.
Do not make any graven images.
Don't take the Lord's name in vain.
And remember the Sabbath and keep it holy.
Love your neighbor as yourself.
Do you just make up what you think is loving towards your neighbor?
Or did God write a book?
Commandments number five through 10, the second table of the law.
Honor your father and mother.
Do not murder.
Do not commit adultery.
Do not steal.
Do not bear false witness.
And do not covet.
So it's not just do unto your neighbor as you would have them do.
God actually lines out what that looks like.
It's not just a blank canvas for our creative license and freedom.
The Bible doesn't just say what to do.
It tells us how to do it.
And to understand that, you have to stop pitting Jesus against the Old Testament and realize that Judaism is not the Old Testament minus Jesus.
It's the Old Testament corrupted and perverted through Jewish rabbis who are trying to wiggle their way out of obedience to God.
And again, the funny thing is, if you read the Old Testament, Jews are constantly falling out of favor with God.
I mean, the most famous one is the, you know, worshiping the golden calf with Moses.
I mean, Moses wasn't gone five minutes and they're worshiping a cow statue.
So it's the idea that nowadays people, you know, act like if you criticize Israel or Jews or Judaism, that you're like in violation of some sacred commandment to never question them.
But it's like, no, the whole story of the Jews is that they are fallen, just like we all are, and they fall away from God and they're tempted away from him.
And then God sends them a prophet to sort of set them right and try to get them back on track.
And then they fall off again.
So, what you're saying is, again, not even like out of line with traditional, you know, Jewish history.
This is what happens.
And for a lot of Jews right now, I would say they've fallen off quite a bit.
You look at things like the number one, the owner of the biggest pornography site in the world, the consortium of pornography sites, is a rabbi.
And it's like, how could you possibly read the Old Testament with all of the beautiful language about chastity and virtue?
And, you know, Solomon writes all these beautiful things about women and being protected.
How can you possibly say that you are in line with the Old Testament beliefs and ideology when you're peddling smut?
And well, that's part of the problem is that, you know, even a guy like Dennis Prager, you know, he has said this publicly, and so I'm not making anything up, but he said that in the case of child pornography, if it's AI and not an actual child, that it would be permissible or adult pornography.
He said that, well, if it's causing you to no longer desire your wife and to no longer be a loving husband, then that's a problem.
But maybe, you know, you just have a greater sexual appetite than your wife and you know, and you're annoying her, you know, and so then it could actually be a way of loving your wife and it's biblically permissible.
And people, you know, Christians have talked to him about that and said, well, this is atrocious.
You're carving out, you know, moral grounds for pornography or AI kiddie porn.
How could you do that?
And what Dennis Prager has said is, you know, because Jesus says, if you lust after a woman in your heart, that you've already committed adultery.
And Dennis Prager will be the first to point out, and I'm not saying he's particularly bad, but this is just a good example of the Jewish worldview.
He's like, oh, well, see, that's not the Torah.
That's not the Old Testament.
But the whole point is that Jesus is taking Moses, thou shalt not commit adultery, and then giving us God's meaning of these are all the different practical applications of that commandment, the seventh commandment, to not commit adultery.
And Jesus says, so you can commit adultery indeed.
You can also commit it in thought.
You can commit it in your heart.
Same, do not murder.
You can commit it in deed, but you can also commit it in thought and in your heart and your emotions and hatred towards other people.
And the modern Jew, even guys who have done some good, like Dennis Prager, are exactly the people that Jesus is talking about.
You are finding a way.
The reason why you reject the New Testament is not because you're extra religious or extra, you know, holy.
It's actually because you know that if you can just have the Old Testament, the Torah, apart from the new, and then litigate it through rabbis instead of exegeting through Jesus, you can lower the bar of morality and get to harbor your sin.
How are you going to think about something all the time and not be tempted by, like, of course, you should not think about and allow yourself to fantasize about things that you aren't actually going to do.
Again, that seems kind of obvious, but and I like that used Dennis Prager as an example because he's obviously, you know, from everything I've seen, he's very like moral.
He's very, you know, he's not, he's, he probably wouldn't own pornography companies, but there are these sort of subtle differences that it's like, well, it's not so bad.
And I remember growing up, like, I grew up, a lot of my friends were Jews.
And like the Christians, we, you know, our parents would tell us, like, you should wait till you're married to have sex.
Like, it's a special thing and that's what God wants.
Sex is really only appropriate inside the bounds of marriage.
Whereas my Jewish friends were told by their parents, hey, sex is an important part of marriage.
And if you aren't compatible on a sexual level, it can cause a lot of problems.
So actually, you want to make sure to sleep with somebody before you really commit to them, because otherwise, if you're not compatible in that way, you could be setting yourself up for a life of misery.
Both, you know, whatever.
You can choose whichever version you want, but these are sort of fundamental differences in that actually matter and how your life plays out and the choices that you make and what you value in morality.
So again, it's just this idea that like Judaism is not Christianity and you can like either one, but the idea that somehow both of these things are exactly the same and Judaism is actually Christianity, but even better somehow, like that a lot of evangelicals especially tend to believe, it's important to identify, look, there are differences and they might not be world breaking, but they're substantial and multiply them out a thousand times, you know, for every person and change the way they act just a little bit.
And you end up with major, glaring gulfs of difference between these two groups.
And that's the whole purpose of the book, you know, the hyphenated heresy, Judeo-Christianity, which you can get on Amazon and it's been doing really well.
We've just released it a little bit over, I think like two and a half weeks ago, and we've already sold, coming up on like 2,500 copies, which is great.
It's self-published, but there's just an appetite for this content.
But that was the big focus at the end of the day is just helping people to understand.
It's not that we hate all Jewish people or anything like that, but helping people understand that Judaism and Christianity, they're not one and the same.
There is no such thing as Judeo-Christian.
And people say, well, of course, as religions, they're distinct.
And so there's no Judeo-Buth, but that phrase was just talking about our common virtues.
And what we're articulating in the book is, no, even at the level of virtues and values and morals, Jews and Christians don't share that either.
Just like you just said, your Jewish friends grew up hearing one set of morals from their parents.
Christians grew up hearing a difference.
So even this idea of shared virtues, no, no, we don't have, it's like, well, we have the shared Ten Commandments.
Correct.
But we have the Ten Commandments explained by Christ in the light of the New Testament and how they apply even at the level of the heart.
They have the Ten Commandments watered down with more obscurity and more loopholes by 2,000 years of lawyers trying to figure out a way to basically slip one past God.
So religiously, this is different.
Morally, this is different.
And then we have a substantial section of the book talking about the way Judeo-Christian has been hijacked as a tool politically to get America and Western nations to be subservient to Israel, even against our own interest.
So the reading level is like, I'm not an academic.
So it's like probably like a ninth grade reading level.
It's an easy, smooth read that you can just turn, you know, page after page after page and enjoyable, but it is well footnoted.
And so it's 250 pages.
And, you know, on almost every page, you know, there's a good quarter of the bottom or a third of the bottom of the page with receipts and citations.
So, you know, guys who want to look something up in the Mishnah, or they want to look something up in the Talmud, or they want to check this political politician that we cited or whatever, they can do that.
So for guys who want not just the easy reading, but they actually want proofs and they're trying to kind of build up their arguments, then it'll satisfy them in that regard.
But if you just read it and you're not checking out every single footnote and all those kinds of things, it's a really easy read.
It's an enjoyable read.
And it's the kind of thing that you can give to your evangelical Zionist grandma.
And she would, she like, your grandma, who's like, you know, my greatest desire isn't my grandson would go and die for Israel.
You know, like that, that woman, God bless her, you know, she's the sweetest lady in the world and she makes great cookies and all those kinds of things.
She's in church every Sunday and she's just, you know, she's just been deceived by propaganda.
You could give this to her and she'll probably still want to support Israel and still think, well, politically, though, they're still our greatest ally.
But she would read this.
She wouldn't throw it in the trash and call it anti-Semitic.
And she would say, you know what, that actually was helpful because at least religiously, I understand there's some big distinctions.
And I can still be friends with Jews, but I definitely need to share the gospel with them and to preach Christ to them because they're lost and they need Jesus.
And, you know, we were talking about it during the break that like what we're saying, it's so funny because like you're a pastor.
I'm a loving dude.
I love Jews and like some of my best friends are Jews, but like the conversation we're having could be perceived as like viciously hateful.
And of course like the ADL would be writing articles about us, you know, saying all this stuff.
But, you know, there's nothing that I say on the show that I wouldn't say to my Jewish friends.
Like, you know, we have to talk about this stuff.
And it's, it's not hateful and it's not mean.
It's just the world.
And you have to talk about it, especially when these topics are central to major global events, including the fact that right now, because I just saw the word Sinai on the back of this, you talked about, you know, at the foot of Sinai, a nation met its God in thunder and fire.
From that covenant flowed the faith of Abraham, Moses, and the prophets fulfilled, not replaced in Christ.
And now they're going to Mount Sinai with a new set of Ten Commandments as they're trying to usher in this unified, like Noahide, whatever it is.
But essentially, they're trying to fold the three big Abrahamic religions into a one-world religion, sort of stripped of its spirituality, but very useful in getting what they want internationally.
So, again, it's important to understand, like, you can't let them try to degrade the differences between these religions because at the end of the day, they're trying to fold them together.
They're trying to destroy all three religions as they try to create a one-world religion.
That don't take my word for it.
They're literally holding ceremonies on Mount Sinai, announcing this and building a temple of Abrahamic faith.
It's funny that you mentioned that, Harrison, because I just finished reading.
This is the second time now with I have five children, and it's our second time finishing the whole Narnia series by C.S. Lewis.
And so we literally just finished the last two chapters of the last book, which is called The Last Battle in the Narnian series.
There's six books.
And we finished the last two chapters last night as I was reading to my children.
And the big thing that in that book that is emphasized is there's the Kalorman who C.S. Lewis describes.
People even asked him in interviews, like, were you kind of talking about Muslims?
And he's like, yeah.
He describes them as like darker skin and dark eyes and big beards, you know, and these kinds of things.
And then the Narnians who are like, you know, fair skinned.
And they're, of course, you know, Narnia is symbolic of Christians, and Aslan is symbolic of Christ.
But what happens is that one of the Narnians, a talking beast, but who is a Narnian named Shift, he's an ape, but he's clever, but he's also deceitful and shrewd.
He teams up with some of the leading Tarkans, some of the Calamans, and it's all actually political.
It's not really, they use religious garb and religious language and rhetoric, but it's all to just get stuff at the end of the day.
But the big idea that they come up with is that there's this false God of the Calormans called Tash, and then there's Aslan, who's the God of the Narnians, you know, and he's the Christ figure, Aslan the lion.
And they say, well, really, you know, Tash and Aslan are the same God.
And they start calling him Tashlin, Tashlin, and to get this pseudo-unity between these two nations of Narnia and Calorman, and ultimately out of it, to turn everyone into slaves to get free labor and to get free stuff.
And I'm like reading that last night to my kids.
I'm like, holy crap, Judeo-Christianity, you know, like, yeah, it's right there.
No, no, these things have been in place for a long time.
And you can see it in the way that certain sects will be vilified while others will be celebrated in Christianity or Islam or anything.
It's often, you know, the dividing line is who's going along with the mark of the beast antichrist system and who's not.
So they hate Orthodox Christianity because it's the Orthodox Christian preachers who come out going, hey, this is the mark of the beast and we're not going for it.
You know, Russian Orthodoxy, they're desperate to try to destroy and discredit these states.
I'm not Eastern Orthodox and I'm particularly Western.
And so there's big problems that I would have theologically and even culturally, but I got to give it to the EO bros, the Eastern Orthodox guys.
They're based.
Those guys are not Zionists.
Those guys, and they're also not feminist.
There's a reason why a lot of young men have gravitated towards Eastern Orthodoxy because you walk in, it's like Gregorian chants, you know, and all that beautiful.
And your priest is like barrel-chested with a beard down to the buckle of his belt.
And on Monday morning, you know, he's inviting all the men, you know, all the catechumens to come over to his garage and he's like putting up 300 pounds on the bench press.
And in our feminized society where you go to your evangelical church and it's Pastor Sally, you know, like a young, a lot of young men are like, man, I, you know, the theological distinctions, I don't really understand that.
But what I do understand is this dude is a man and I need masculinity in my life.
And again, it's funny because it's, you know, it seems so obvious, but somehow the churches are just in this death spiral where they're losing popularity.
So they try to comport themselves to the modern, you know, society-wide moral degradation, and that just makes things worse.
And it's just, it's funny because everybody from the outside can see it, but the churches just can't help themselves.
They keep going down this death spiral.
And so it's not even like muscular or masculine Christianity.
It's just like just Christianity that stands up for itself and that's strong and that says, this is who we are and we're not apologizing for it.
And I'm sorry, you have a different religion that disagrees with us.
That's fine.
Go over there and do that.
We're not changing for you.
That's all it takes.
And I guess, you know, I guess call that muscular or masculine or whatever, but really it's just true belief.
It's what Christians have always believed, but something changed.
You know, and I think we can kind of date it.
I don't want to blame everything on this, but I think of 1948.
There were waves along the way.
Like you can go back to the Enlightenment and see some of the things that crept into historic Christianity.
You can go back to many different points in history where this happened and that happened and there were cracks in the dam.
But a big one was World War II and this never again mentality.
And I'm not an Adolf Hitler apologist or anything like that.
But I do think that we came away from that with this mentality of a strong, convicted, authoritarian figure, who uses Christian language and rhetoric.
That's incredibly dangerous.
And so what we need instead is we need Western societies, Europe and America.
We need to be inclusive, right?
We need to be accommodating.
We need to be less dogmatic and more relativistic in the way that we hold our beliefs and our convictions.
And what happened was that essentially we became vulnerable.
We became vulnerable to false doctrines.
We became vulnerable to false religion.
We became vulnerable to mass immigration.
We became vulnerable to all these different things.
And at some point, we need to be able to say, essentially, it's like where we are today.
It's like, why can the West not have nice things because of the Austrian painter with a funny mustache?
And at a certain point, we have to be able to get over it.
And getting over it, just for the record, I don't think it means lionizing Hitler.
Getting over it doesn't mean like now I'm wearing a swastika.
I wouldn't do that.
When I say get over it, what I mean is there have been lots of very, very intense figures in history, Genghis Kong, Napoleon, like there's lots of Stalin.
But we have been operating under this cloud of fear and guilt, all in light of one person and one historical event.
I call it Holocaustianity.
You don't have to be a Holocaust denier.
I'm not saying that the only way to break the spell is to say that it never happened.
I would quibble a little bit with some of the numbers and some of the details, but when I say Holocaustianity, what I'm saying is that the Holocaust, regardless of how much of it is for sure, fact, historical fact and true, the Holocaust has been weaponized into a religion.
And essentially what that religion does is it asserts that white Christian Westerners can't have a home.
White Christian Westerners can't have dogma, convictions.
White Christian Westerners have to just bend over and take it from the entire world.
And that is, that's political, that's religious, that's a spiritual weaponizing of World War II history.
And I think that's where a lot of the problems came in.
And of course, I always put it that there's two Holocaust, right?
There's the Little Holocaust, which was the tragic and systematic murder of innocent people by the Nazis, but it also occurred elsewhere in World War II.
And then there's the Capital H Holocaust TM, which really has the characteristics of a religion.
It has dogma that you have to assert.
It has certain things you have to believe.
It has much more the characterization of a religion rather than a historic event.
So I feel like you kind of have to get that to that point where you'll see a lot of evangelical Christians and pastors.
They're like, if you believe in your heart and confess with your mouth that six million Jews died in the Holocaust and that Jesus is Lord, then you will be saved.
Please, sir, tell me which history of the Holocaust must I believe in order to be born again and saved.
And the reality is that like we're not relativists.
There is something that's true and there's something that's false.
And history does matter.
So I'm not trying to trivialize it and say that none of it is important.
But we've elevated that to the level of religious dogma to where there's like, like, I would never have someone coming to me as a pastor in my church and going through like our church membership process.
And I would say, what's your view on Napoleon?
And how many people did you think that he killed down to the exact number?
And if they didn't give me the right answers, I would bar them from membership in my church.
But I know, I know, of evangelical pastors who actually would do that when it comes to World War II history.
So there's lots of tragic events that have happened in the world, but the world is fallen.
It's filled with sin.
But why is this one held almost comparable to the level of believing?
Like, Christians do have to believe there are some non-negotiable historical facts we must believe.
We must believe that 2,000 years ago, the life, the death, the burial, the resurrection, and the ascension of Jesus Christ, that he was born of the Virgin Mary, that he lived a sinless life, that he died not just as a moral example of sacrificial love for his friends, but he died as a Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world.
He died as a substitute under the wrath of God so that I might receive his righteousness and forgiveness.
He bodily, not just in a metaphor or symbology, but bodily rose from the grave and has ascended to the right hand of God the Father, where he is seated and interceding on our behalf.
And one day he will return to judge both the living and the dead.
That is the faith once and for all passed down to the saints.
Everything else, it doesn't mean that everything else is relative.
They're still true and they're still false.
But everything else, it does not call your salvation into question to simply say, well, I, you know, I kind of think Pat Buchanan was on to something.
Right now, like Pat Buchanan, there are guys who are just reading, you know, the fall of the West, you know, or like some of Pat Buchanan stuff on this event or that event, and they're being demonized by Christian pastors as though they were reading, you know, like a Master Crowley or something.
It's crazy and it's distorted and it's happened sort of subtly.
And, you know, this sort of idea has been built up slowly but surely.
But now at this point, I mean, especially when you talk about evangelicals, this, again, it goes out of the realm of religion into the realm of geopolitics when you have countries like Israel bringing over a thousand pastors to deliberately indoctrinate them into imbuing their religious speeches with the geopolitical concerns of the state of Israel and trying to align those.
It has become a very potent vector of propaganda for the state of Israel, the evangelical mission in America, which is also strange because at the same time, evangelicals are being viciously demonized in America.
And I want to go to the clip of that in just a second.
Before we do, let's go to the trailer because I understand we have the trailer now.
Again, the book that discusses all of this in easy to read but excruciating detail.
I actually, I really like that because you can just read it and just accept it if you want.
But if you really want to dig in and interrogate these beliefs, then all of the footnotes are there.
So it's sort of, you know, you can read it whatever speed you want.
But let's go to the trailer for this.
Again, the book is hyphenated heresy, Judeo-Christianity.
I add the dash, but that's the hyphenation by Joel Webbin and Jordan Hall.
At the foot of Mount Sinai, a nation met its God in thunder and fire.
From that covenant flowed the faith of Abraham, Moses, and the prophets, fulfilled, not replaced, in Christ.
But somewhere between the martyrs and the modern West, the truth was blurred.
Politicians and pastors began speaking of a Judeo-Christian civilization.
A phrase born not of Sinai, but in Washington, tracing its roots not to Moses, but to the Pharisees.
The hyphenated heresy challenges the myth of the hyphen, tracing how it reshaped Christian identity, redefined the church's witness, and bound modern faith to political Zionism.
And yeah, I mean, of course, you know, it goes back to the Pharisees.
What if you're talking about Israel?
It goes back to the Rothschilds.
I mean, this was a political move by, you know, bankers and elite, and they weaponized faith and they weaponize all faiths in order to achieve this.
You know, it doesn't mean that the people that live there are evil necessarily, people that, you know, believe the religion of their fathers are, you know, deserve to die or whatever.
It just means that you have to recognize this stuff not only in a spiritual and religiously significant way, but that it has impacts on modern politics.
And, you know, I don't even necessarily begrudge the Jews for doing a lot of the anti-Semitism stuff.
Like, sure, you don't want people talking trash about you and you want to speak out about that.
You know, more power to you.
Of course, when it gets into the tyranny and they're lying about it and they're saying, oh, it's anti-Semitism when really you're just talking about Jeffrey Epstein or whatever, obviously that's wrong and can be very easily manipulated.
But it's the case with a lot of stuff that Jews are accused of.
And I always talked about talking to my friend who was Jewish.
And I asked him if he was going to stay in town or because he was getting a new job.
And he said, well, I'm Jewish.
We're not that many people.
I can basically get a job anywhere in the world.
Anywhere in the world, I'm probably one or two degrees of separation from somebody in London or Jakarta that could give me a job.
It's just the way the Jewish community works and operates and whatever.
And it's like, what am I supposed to say?
Don't do that.
Don't take advantage.
No, it's, you know, whatever.
But, you know, when you weaponize it, and the point I'm saying this is, I don't necessarily begrudge them wanting to defend themselves, but we also have to defend ourselves.
And the lies and smears about Christianity that are happening today, they're not, you know, nothing.
You have to confront them and say, this is bad and evil.
And this is not just an opinion about a religious group.
It's a lie, an attempt to demonize and dehumanize a group of people, probably because you intend to do them harm.
And I have a video of this.
I hadn't watched it until I saw it on Alex's show.
It's crazy.
Let's go to it and we'll comment on the other side.
So when you think about the Erica Kirks, the Life Church, the Joel Olstein of it all, and their desire to accumulate wealth while hoodwinking their flock into thinking they're super moral.
This is a cancer.
White evangelical Christianity is a cancer.
These are the worst of our country.
These are the worst people in our country because they use their religion in two ways as a weapon and as a shield.
They weaponize it whenever they want to and say, we're on the moral high ground.
You're a lesbian.
You deserve to die.
You're a lesbian.
The cops shouldn't have revived you.
Oh, your parents are Mexicans and they brought you over here.
Yeah, she's trying to incite people against Christians.
I have to go on record and say, I don't like Joel Osteen either.
I don't like life church either.
And I do think that there are charlatans within the evangelical church who do fleece the flock.
And, you know, like, hey, if you give me all your money, you know, then you'll be blessed by God.
You know, it's, there's literally a term for that.
We call it the prosperity gospel.
It's a health and wealth gospel that ultimately says, like, if you trust in Jesus and, you know, wish really hard upon a shooting star, you know, then all of your dreams will come true.
And that's not what the Bible teaches.
So that is a false teaching and it's damnable.
And so I have a huge problem with that.
But you can tell that if that's all she said, if she just had a problem with the prosperity gospel as a heresy and the way that it preys on the poor, fine.
But that's, she's using them because people like Joel Osteen are low-hanging fruit to get to her real target.
And her real target is, she said it, white evangelical Christians, all of them.
She's not just concerned about T.D. Jakes or Joel Osteen or, you know, somebody who's, you know, Joyce Meyer, who's teaching the prosperity gospel, Benny Hinn.
She is concerned with white evangelical Christians.
And then what she describes, like what she's saying right there is the lesbian thing, they're bigots, the Mexican thing, they're racist.
And she's describing, you know, a person that, by and large, doesn't really exist.
Most evangelicals, when I talk to them, because I, you know, I believe that race is real and I believe it matters.
I'm not a race essentialist.
I think that, you know, our faith in Christ is paramount, religion first.
But when I talk to people about race, they don't have a racist bone in their body.
I'm here to announce a new extremely exciting product at thealxstore.com and that's Mind Fuel.
Brought to you by the same folks that developed Optimal Human.
This is an optimal human product.
We set out with our sponsor Bigley to come out with a clean nootropic energy shot that doesn't have any letdown but gives you clean energy.
This stuff is so strong though, I take half a shot in the morning.
It's a big shot.
And another half in the afternoon if I need to work late.
But again, you can still sleep on it because it's not a traditional stimulant.
So if you loved Optimal Human, the strongest, best supernutrient-packed green drink out there, available right now, thealtchestore.com, you are going to love Mind Fuel.
And when I go through these ingredients, go research these for yourself and then know when you find out how great they are that we have the very best and the very strongest in this product, Mind Fuel, available right now at thealxtore.com.
Nootropic Mind Fuel is here.
This clean, caffeine-free energy shot is designed for clear thinking, steady focus, and zero compromise.
It's time to abandon sugary energy drinks and stimulant-heavy formulas in favor of clean, functional, nootropic-based energy.
Zero calories, sugar-free.
Benefit.
No crash.
No blood sugar.
Spike.
Advantage.
Can be used daily without guilt and is good for your whole body, not just your brain.
Caffeine-free formula.
Smooth, clean energy.
Advantage.
Ideal for caffeine-sensitive users and late-day use.
Nootropic alpha GPC, Citricoli, DMAE, G-A-B-A.
Benefit.
Supports mental clarity and focus.
Advantage.
Competes with premium brain formulas in a convenient shot.
And the best part is it's an adapted genetic and herbal proprietary blend.
Balanced grounded energy.
Advantage.
Appeals to both biohackers and holistic consumers.
And then it's got high-quality electrolytes and a spectrum of high-quality bee.
If you love our other products, thealyshstore.com, you're going to love mind fuel.
And if you haven't tried our ultramethylene blue or our Shilohy or Irish C-Moss or our Bovi Clostrum, you're crazy.