Tuesday War Room: Pentagon Acquires Havana Syndrome Device Through Undercover Operation, Trump Issues New Statement on Jerome Powell & Scott Adams Passes Away at 68
Harrison Smith and Michael Cargill dissect Scott Adams’ death, his final Christian conversion, and claims of liberal-conservative "alternate realities," while exposing Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to Clinton, Iran-Contra, and a Soros-linked cabal orchestrating regime-change operations like Ukraine’s Maidan and U.S. riots. Australia’s 2026 anti-extremism bill—criminalizing membership in listed groups with up to seven years in prison—sparked fears of white nationalist suppression, despite exemptions for Islamist and Jewish speech. Callers linked border chaos to "Great Reset" theories, Trump’s alleged astrological strike timing, and systemic corruption in Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Pierce County, where millions in fraud went unaddressed. Cargill warned of Second Amendment erosion, banking attacks on businesses, and urged prepping for potential government overreach, concluding that uniform gun rights and financial vigilance are critical survival tools in an increasingly authoritarian landscape. [Automatically generated summary]
I'm your host, Jerry Stein Smith, coming to you live this Tuesday afternoon, 13th of January, 2025.
We got a lot of stuff to talk about today.
A lot of news to cover.
But we're going to start today with a bit of sad news and a bit of an homage, a bit of a memorial to the great Scott Adams, one of the most prominent voices in the MAGA movement, the author of the Dilbert comic books, and a real Maverick.
And he'd been sick for a long time and he passed away today.
So I wanted to play a video of his from September of this year following the Charlie Kirk assassination.
But he gets into a concept that he sort of introduced to political discourse, which is the idea of watching two different movies on the same screen, the alternate realities that liberals and conservatives reside in.
His impact on this world will go long beyond his life.
Of teachers and people associated with schools of various types who are getting canceled, meaning fired, for saying horrible things about essentially being happy or saying it was justified that Charlie Kirk got assassinated.
Well, what do you think about that?
That people are losing their jobs all over the place.
Well, let me tell you the thing that is most shocking about that.
The most shocking thing is that the people who spoke out that way believed they wouldn't get fired.
I think they were all surprised, which means they've been living entirely within a bubble in which they thought other people would agree with that.
Are you kidding me?
They thought they were in the bubble of reality where, let's say that Hitler was an American and he died.
Would you feel bad about saying, thank God, Hitler died?
No, you wouldn't, because you would assume that almost every single person would agree with you.
So it would be easy to say that.
These people are saying it in public for the world to see as if that's what a normal person would think.
How hypnotized would you have to be?
So in my mind anyway, and I think I've said it online at least once, I think of these people as the hypnotized Hitlerians.
Hypnotize Hitlerians.
You can drop the hypnotized if you need to.
But the Hitlerians are people who live in this little world where they think Hitler actually came to power in the United States because so many bad people on the left have been saying that.
People who should know better.
So I actually have some weird empathy for these teachers getting fired for saying horrendous things about Charlie Kirk because they actually think they're in a different reality than they are.
How do you think you're in a different reality?
Is it because you individually had some mental problem?
Probably not.
It's probably really a predictable outcome of the rhetoric that we're seeing from the left.
It's the most predictable outcome that people would believe it as literal, all the Hitler stuff.
Oh, it's literally as bad as Hitler.
We better do something about it.
So I would say the people getting canceled are in their own way, although, you know, our system is that you have to hold them responsible.
I'm not saying they're not responsible.
They are responsible, but they are also victims because they've been hypnotized to believe something hideous and going through life.
Imagine them going through life thinking that they live in a world that had been taken over by some Hitler character.
I don't even know what that would feel like, but it would certainly distort your opinions and actions.
He passed away this morning after a very long and public battle with cancer.
So, of course, we'll keep him in our prayers.
He did issue a final letter to everybody where he converted to Christianity and embraced Jesus Christ.
So again, his impact will last long, long after he's gone.
Still unfortunate.
Godspeed, Scott Adams.
We'll be back from the other side of the news.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you this morning on InfoWars, or this afternoon rather, on Infowars.com, banned.video.
Streaming on X as well.
Of course, please do share those links.
We got a lot of news to talk about today.
I'm also going to open up the lines for your calls, probably about halfway through the show.
Might do the same thing Alex did, say, new callers only.
But I do feel like we need some other voices in the conversation because right now it feels like the same conversation is being had over and over and over, which is just, okay, what do we do now?
What do we do now?
And why is Trump not just doing what we elected him to do?
I mean, everybody on the right wing that I hear talk about this either is like Dan Bongino basically saying, shut up, stop questioning.
Trump's doing amazingly.
You just don't get it, which obviously isn't true.
Or the vast majority of people are all sitting around going, all right, Trump's just not doing it.
So what is next?
Where do we go from here?
What do you do when you discover, when you finally establish once and for all that your electoral system is utterly fraudulent and cannot be used to correct the system as it stands?
Where do you go from here?
We'll take your calls on that and a lot more.
Well, let's begin today as you do every day with our Daily Dispatch.
All right, folks, here it is, your Daily Dispatch.
For Tuesday, the 13th of January, 2025, Bill and Hillary Clinton declare themselves above the law as they defy Epstein's subpoena with an astonishing letter slamming Trump's, quote, cruel agenda.
Cruel agenda of getting justice for the girls they raped and trafficked.
Yeah.
The ex-president was scheduled to testify in a closed-door deposition in the House Oversight Committee's bipartisan investigation into Epstein at 10 a.m. Tuesday, but failed to show.
Hillary was slated to appear on Wednesday.
House Oversight Republican Chairman James Comer promised to bring contempt proceedings next week, setting off a potentially protracted and politically fraught legal battle that would be the first time in history a sitting or former former president has been held in contempt by Congress.
So we'll show you that in just a little bit.
We'll show you Comer's statements.
It's just goes on and on.
The merry-go-round never stops.
It's just, you would think at a certain point we'd be able to punish the criminals, but not even on the horizon as far as I can tell.
Meanwhile, Trump administration ends Somalia TPS, affecting thousands of migrants.
The Trump administration is ending temporary protected status for Somalia, affecting several thousand Somalis living in the U.S. and several hundred currently living in Minnesota under the protection.
Somali immigrants with TPS will be required to leave the country by March 17th.
Temporary means temporary, DHS Secretary Christy Noam told Fox News Digital in a statement: Country conditions in Somalia have improved to the point where it no longer meets the law's requirement for temporary protected status.
I'm sure this will be reversed by probably a Somalian in a judge's robe pretty soon.
If I look back in the past and continue that pattern into the future, meanwhile, Trump favors attacking Iran, Vance pushing back as President Pezken in streets for large counter-protest.
There are reports of a significant internal Trump administration divide over Iran policy, with Vice President Vance said to be leading the charge for the non-interventionist camp, which much of MAGA might welcome, seeing Vance as the top contender in 2028.
Yes, this is, again, it's the same internal battle that we've been reporting on since the beginning of this administration, with some America First portion of the Trump administration not being in favor of going to war for Israel over and over forever, and a large chunks of his administration that are Israeli, so or Israeli-controlled.
We just pray for ourselves in America and the world that the anti-interventionalists went out.
Finally, Pentagon paid eight figures for a mysterious device believed to be the cause of Havana syndrome that sickened spies, sources say from Daily Mail.
The weapon has been blamed for a series of unexplained ailments impacting U.S. spies, diplomats, and military service members for the past decade.
According to military sources speaking to CNN, the Defense Department has spent more than a year testing the device, which was reportedly purchased in an undercover operation for eight figures.
The device was clandestinely purchased in the final days of the Biden administration and is said to produce pulsed radio waves that penetrate a person's body, according to insiders.
Yeah, maybe.
Yeah, maybe.
Maybe they bought it from somebody just now and we didn't know about it.
Or maybe they've been testing direct energy weapons since the 1950s and we didn't buy it from anybody because we made it ourselves literally decades ago.
You know, it was one of those.
It's one of those two.
And actually, our final story is, of course, story we started with: Dilbert creator Scott Adams dead at 68.
POTUS referred to the late cartoonist as a fantastic guy who supported him when it wasn't popular to do so.
President Trump offered his condolences to Scott's family.
Cartoonist Scott Adams died after a long and protracted battle with prostate cancer.
And of course, we will remember him and his contributions to the overall sanity of this country and the world.
That's your daily dispatch brought to you, of course, by theaxjonesstore.com, the alexjonesstore.com is where you go to get any of the supplements that can massively change your life, as well as you get 50% off the awesome badass new trench knife that we have, which is the same model as our old trench knife, which was an absolute bestseller, but it's got a cool new design on the side with a 1950s pin-up girl.
And life is fiery with its beauty.
Really a beautiful weapon.
You can get it right now at thealixjonesstore.com at that introductory price.
So let's get into the story that we covered at the top of the Daily Dispatch.
That is the fact that Bill and Hillary Clinton have decided not to appear for their hearing, their deposition in front of Congress.
Now, this is a similar thing that happened with Steve Bannon or Peter Navarro.
They, of course, spent time in jail following this.
Will Bill and Hillary Clinton spend time in jail?
I had to guess, I'd say probably not.
If I had to go by the pattern that we've witnessed over the last several decades, I have a feeling they're going to get away with this because they always do.
I'm going to go down to clip number 11.
This is House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer talking about holding Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress.
Unanimously by the committee in a bipartisan manner, we will move next week in the House Oversight Committee markup to hold former President Clinton in contempt of Congress.
And of course, we've reported he was called Epstein's best friend when the victims of Epstein were asked who else they should look into.
Apropos of nothing, they say, first and foremost, Bill Clinton.
He was second in command, you might say.
He was the most prominent person that they saw with Epstein.
We've talked about how Epstein himself was introduced to one of his victims by Bill Clinton, who called Epstein the king of America.
And of course, we've explained that this is all tied in with Iran-Contra.
It goes all the way back to Mina, Arkansas.
And Clinton was already in the CIA then, positioned as governor to provide the cover-up and give legal cover to the drug-running operations that were being used to fund black side operations by the CIA as well as destroy America from the inside out by flooding our ghettos with highly potent narcotics.
And all of this is the same sort of trend, the same sort of organization.
And like that's, again, the thing that we're repeatedly shown over and over and over and over is that there is in this world today a secret ruling class that is above reproach, above the law, cannot be pulled in.
It's not just about money.
People with money can be charged with things.
People with money can be taken down and sent to prison.
These people don't have the most money out of anybody, right?
Bill and Hillary Clinton, I'm sure, are rolling in the dough, but they have something more important than money.
They have institutional power.
They have well-established participation in intelligence agent activities, intelligence agency activities.
That means it's actually the prerogative of the agency themselves to protect Bill and Hillary Clinton because they're actually just protecting the agency itself.
So, like, that's what you need to understand.
Like, it's infuriating.
It's wrong.
It shouldn't be this way.
How we dismantle this system is pretty obvious.
You have to go for the head of the snake.
You have to dismantle the CIA itself.
You have to clear out the seventh floor of the State Department where all this stuff takes place.
And we're going to get into a little bit later, maybe sooner rather than later.
But the way George Soros plays into this, because people are realizing, in fact, we'll go to this video because I do think it ties it all in together.
And again, it's just an understanding that puts most world activities in a frame that's understandable and recognizable.
That is, very simply, the intelligence agencies are the enforcement arm of the banking elite.
Okay.
The politicians are the front-facing mask of the intelligence agencies, but they're all working together.
And the people who are actually in charge of these agencies and actually the highest up agents of these intelligence networks are never formally in the agencies at all.
They're business magnates or bankers or presidents of the United States, but you're not going to find them, you know, with their picture on the wall in the Langley headquarters because actually the CIA is an underlink to the global groups, the secretive global networks that operate above the national intelligence networks as an international superstructure of control that use the CIA as pawns.
It's not actually that complicated, but that's just what you need to understand when you look at this.
Because when you truly understand that, when you really comprehend what it is I'm saying here, then it's not confusing to you why Bill and Hillary Clinton are refusing to testify because they have no fear that they'll be thrown into prison.
They have no reason to adhere to any laws because they themselves are literally above the law.
Like, I know people understand this to a certain degree.
I should really bring in some more clips of like CIA agents talking about this.
Like John Kiricow, you know, was always going around talking about this.
Where, and, you know, Tex Gunderson, what's that's name?
Ted Gunderson.
Ted Gunderson came out with this decades ago, talking about the fact that, like, theoretically, you know, some of the things the CIA does, like, there really is no justification for it.
But when you're the intelligence agencies and you get to say, well, if we don't do this, millions of people will die.
What, you know, what can't you fabricate or do?
So you just have to understand.
When Jeffrey Epstein was arrested, he had like 10 different passports from like Saudi Arabia and all these other places.
Like when you're a CIA agent or a CIA operative or a useful asset to them, in fact, I just, I actually just saw a video.
It wasn't John Kirica.
I don't think it was that other CIA guy who I trust less, but he's got the crazy fizzy hair.
And he's talking about he had a guy that he was interrogating and he's being all cloak and dagger about it.
But essentially what he's saying is that the guy demanded children as payment.
Said, I have information that can save millions of lives.
I demand children as payment.
And the guy's like, all right, well, I can't do that.
Like, that's not possible.
And he goes to his superiors and his superiors say, of course that's possible.
Just send a request.
Okay.
And again, he's being all, you know, double-blind about it, where he's going, you know, there was something this man wanted as currency.
And I thought, there's no way we can get that.
But my superior is just like, yeah, tell Langley.
Just send a request.
We need one child.
Please send it off.
They send you a child.
You give it to the criminal.
And he disposes of it at his leisure.
Like, that's the type of thing these people do.
That's what they can get away with.
Do you know where to source a child?
Probably not, right?
Because you haven't maintained the networks of human trafficking and drug trafficking.
You aren't involved in the mafia as the secret state partner of these criminal groups.
They are.
All these people.
This is what they do.
That's what they're involved in.
They are, for all intents and purposes, literally above the law.
Okay.
When you can go demand passports or sacrificial children or drugs or whatever else, like they can just do whatever, whenever.
There's no limits.
There's no barriers.
There's nothing because it's secretive and it's predicated on national security.
And these two things go hand in hand.
So we can do whatever we want and we don't have to tell you what we're doing.
Okay, if you are a criminal mastermind, like why would you not set that system up?
Once you set that system up, well, it explains the last several decades of the course of humankind, doesn't it?
Let's go to clip 15 here.
I believe this is 15.
Actually, you know what?
I may be looking at the wrong video.
Yeah, let's go to clip 24 here.
Clip 24.
Is somebody realizing what she's part right?
She's getting there.
She's getting there.
Thing to understand, she's going to talk about how George Soros is a CIA asset.
I'll go over it with you in just a second, but this is ultimately important because the exact same strategy of color revolution that was carried out in Ukraine and unsuccessfully carried out in Georgia and all these other places is now not only being used in Iran, but in America as well.
I mean, it's the exact same playbook we see roll out over and over again because this is a tried and tested, effectual way to take over a country.
I think I found the real reason George Soros is still allowed to operate freely inside the United States while he's been kicked out or heavily restricted in Russia, Hungary, Turkey, Pakistan, Poland, the Philippines, and a half dozen other countries.
The answer is simple, and it's hiding in plain sight.
George Soros has probably been one of the CIA's most valuable private assets for over 40 years.
He's the civilian, deniable billion-dollar funding arm of American regime change operations worldwide.
That's why no attorney general, no Congress, and no president has ever seriously moved to shut him down here.
He's not just allowed in America, he's protected.
This is why both George and Alex are so arrogant.
If you've seen my video on color revolutions, you already know the script.
Soros bankrolled this prototype in Serbia in 2000, refined it in Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, and the Arab Spring in 2011.
The same USAID, NED, and Open Society Foundation's logos appear in every single one.
The Arab Spring was the trial run for Europe's migrant crisis.
In 2011, the CIA and Soros turned that playbook on Libya and Syria.
Gaddafi warned the West in March of 2011 that if you take him out, millions would flood Europe from Africa.
Eight months later, he was dead, and Libya was chaos, and the migrant waves began exactly as he had predicted.
By 2015-2016, battle-hardened jihadists and economic migrants were streaming across the Mediterranean with iPhones, prepaid cards, and Twitter guides written in Arabic.
The same social media mobilization tactics used in Kyiv and Tahir Square.
Wayne Madsen called it straight in 2015.
This was a deliberate Soros CIA social engineering operation to fracture Europe from within.
Same playbook, new target.
And now we have America, 2020 to present.
Remember the 2020 summer riots?
Soros Open Societies Foundations gave at least $33 million to the groups that organized and sustained them.
How about the southern border caravans?
Soros-backed NGOs provided the lawyers, the maps, and the logistics.
How about to fund the police and DAs in every major city?
Soros money elected them.
They're running the color revolution playbook on us now.
Only this time, the target isn't Belgrade or Damascus, it's you.
And this is why JFK was right.
After the Bay of Pigs betrayal, President Kennedy reportedly told AIDS he wanted to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds.
He never got the chance.
62 years later, we're living in the world the CIA built.
One where a Hungarian-born billionaire who collapsed the Bank of England can pour unlimited dark money into American elections and street movements.
And nobody in power dares touch him because he's not a liability.
He's their most successful off-the-books contractor.
The only question left: if Hungary, a country of 9 million people, can pass stop Soros laws and kick his operations out, why can't we?
Yeah, so again, she's right in one regard, but I think she kind of has it backwards, right?
Soros isn't working for the CIA.
The CIA is employed by Soros.
You understand that difference?
Soros is a part of the group above the CIA that's orchestrating all of this.
And actually, a video went viral recently of George Soros being interviewed by Christia Friedland, by the way.
Remember Christia Friedland, deputy prime minister under Justin Trudeau, helped to get rid of all the bank accounts of the truckers.
Then she moved over to replace the Zelensky lieutenants that fled the country with $100 million to go live in Israel.
So that Christia Friedland is interviewing George Soros, and they're bragging about how every single person in the Ukrainian government was a George Soros fellow, had gone through his open societies training organization and had been, you know, indoctrinated as an agent of theirs.
Do you think that's not being done under the auspices of international intelligence?
I mean, you've got Victoria Newland, obviously, as Under Secretary of State, Deputy Secretary of State, helping to carry out the Maidan Revolution, overthrow the duly elected president of Ukraine, install the puppet regime, all in service of starting a war with Russia.
Victoria Newland then went on to enter into the National Endowment for Democracy.
Like these are the kingpins, and it almost doesn't matter what position they're in.
I mean, they sort of flit from position to position, or George Soros, you're just sort of this kingpin with an apparently infinite amount of money that you can pour tens of billions of dollars into organizations year over year, despite the fact that you made your money in the late 90s and haven't done much since.
I mean, it's like Jeffrey Epstein.
It's all like the details don't even matter that much.
What you have to understand is that there is this international cabal that shares money with each other, summons money out of thin air.
It's the same people that are running the Fed and BlackRock and Goldman Sachs that are now, you know, in Ukraine.
You look at that, that's, again, sort of the epicenter of all of this corruption, which is why when Trump first started looking into it in his first administration, they immediately impeached him in order to stop him from tugging on the string that would unravel the whole sweater.
So once you understand that, once you understand that you've got the George Soros network that he's just a node of, that Jeffrey Epstein's a note of, that Victoria Newland's a node of, and these people are starting wars, switching positions internationally even.
Christia Friedland going from Canada to Ukraine, but is apparently working hand in hand with George Soros, a Hungarian-American.
It's an international organization.
That's the intelligence community that you always hear so much about.
It's not American.
It's an intelligence community that's international and it serves their own interest, not yours.
Bill Clinton is an important member of this cabal.
So once you get brought in, you get all the secrets.
This is the war room and forrest.com, banned.video.
One of the other big things happening today.
The Supreme Court is deciding whether men can compete in women's sports.
Because that's the world we live in right now.
It's that the Supreme Court of the United States is trying to determine whether men and women are different from one another and whether men's physicality represents an unfair advantage in sports.
They're really trying to hammer this out, trying to figure it out.
I think tomorrow they're going to really be arguing about whether the sky is blue.
They're going to have a week-long discussion about water.
Is it wet or not?
We're all very confused by all of this.
It is kind of hard to cover.
Like, are we supposed to take this seriously?
Are we supposed to treat this seriously?
Like, frankly, I think this data point alone would be enough for George Washington to say, my bad.
Never mind.
We're going back with the English.
Something went horribly wrong somewhere along the way.
If you could bring George Washington to 2026, I'm sure everything that you could show him about the modern world would cause a sort of existential terror in him.
But the idea that the Supreme Court in 2025 is arguing whether or not men and women are different, because that is the argument at the end of the day.
That's it.
Are men and women different?
Yes.
Great.
Case closed.
This went up to the Supreme Court.
And some of the Supreme Court justices are very confused.
They're very confused.
Justice Brown Jackson faceplants in a bizarre word salad of a question while trying to defend boys and girls' sports, gets schooled by Idaho AG.
Then Justice Gorsuch steps in.
And there's been a couple audio pieces that have come out about this, come out from the discussions here.
And you understand the reason why it's so absurd that this is being questioned is because the entire idea of transgenderism is predicated on the gender part, that somehow sex, your biological sex, is something distinct and separate from your gender, which is your social, the social manifestation of your sex.
And so that's what, like, that's what transgender is predicated on.
That's what the whole idea is.
And the whole time that the arguments about transgenderism have been raised, have been raging, there's been an understanding that there's a difference between the gender expression of an individual and their biological sex.
Yeah, I'm speaking in their language now, right?
When you're talking about sports, you're not talking about social acceptance.
You're talking about scientific reality.
When you're talking about medicine, you're not talking about their gender expression.
You're talking about biological sex.
So why is this even a part of the conversation?
The whole idea is, oh, how you present socially and how people treat you and whether they reference you as a boy or a girl or whether, like, that's a completely separate discussion than are men and women physiologically separate from one another, which the answer is undeniably yes.
So the fact that this is even, that this ever became part of the conversation, if transgender activists were honest in the first place, the minute sports came up, they would say, no, we shouldn't be involved in sports.
That has nothing to do with what we're talking about.
What we're talking about is social acceptance.
And okay, if somebody wants to wear a dress, you should treat them as a woman.
And if they present as a woman, you should treat them like that out of respect for them.
But sports, no, that's like a physical scientific thing.
It's like men are just stronger and their bones are thicker than women.
Like this is just a fact.
If transgender activists were honest, even in the slightest, then this whole sport controversy would never even have been an issue.
But it's about destroying these systems.
It's about taking this as far as you possibly can to disrupt not just the social fabric of our society, but like the underlying fundamental reality itself.
It really exposes what all of this transgenderism is about.
Because again, if it was about social acceptance, if it was about what they claim it's about, gender, not sex, then sports would have never entered into the conversation.
But this sports conversation has now gone up to the Supreme Court of the United States because we can't figure out whether or not men have an advantage over women.
It is beyond absurd.
We have a clip from this.
Let's go to clip 10 here.
This is DEI Justice Kentanji Brown Jackson firing back at the Red State Communicator.
Man, can you imagine how successful we would be?
Can you imagine Finfo wars, FIMFO wars?
Well, we'll get there.
We'll get slowly but surely.
We've replaced one with a woman.
Slowly but surely, we will all be replaced by women.
Let's listen to Kentanji Brown Jackson struggle to deal with basic reality.
But the law, but the law actually operates differently, I think, for cisgender women and transgender women.
That is, with respect to their desire to play on a team that matches their gender identity, cisgender women can do it.
Transgender women cannot.
And so we do appreciate a distinction, I think, that is being drawn on the basis of your gender status, gender identity status, trans or cis, right?
unidentified
So, and I want to make sure I understand if we're operating in Title IX world or equal protection world, because I think it might make a difference to the answer.
So if I understand correctly, she thinks there's a difference between trans women and cis women when it comes to sports.
It's not.
You can call them trans.
You can call them cis.
You can call them monkeys.
You can call them anything.
It doesn't matter.
The underlying biology doesn't change.
I don't think she understands that.
How does she not understand that?
Do you see what's happening here?
Do you get it?
It's just, it is just pure insanity.
I mean, what are we doing here?
What are we talking about?
How is this what our society is engaged in at this moment?
It's retarded.
It's retarded.
Our entire, like, the definition of retarded.
We have, which I don't, maybe that's not even the right word.
It's worse than that.
Because we haven't just slowed or stopped like the word retard is supposed to be used.
We've actually gone backwards so far that I don't even know if there's ever even been a time in the world where people didn't know that men and women were different.
I think we may have gone back to the point where we were some sort of primordial ooze because this is fundamental to reality and we've seemingly lost grasp of that.
It's really kind of terrifying.
Mostly it's just annoying, though.
Mostly it's really just annoying that we even have to have these conversations.
And that is maybe the biggest damnation of it all, that we just have to endlessly argue these points for some reason.
Like, why are we arguing any of these points?
Like, there's got to be a way.
There's got to be a way that we can just be ruled by people that recognize reality and keep out the people that don't.
Like, is there no way that we can build a system to establish that?
You know, it's just so weird because they first like inject it with all of this academic speak, whatever, right?
Well, we're not talking about biological sex here.
We're talking about gender expression, which is different because those are based on socioeconomic perspectives that are, and it's just like, okay, so, all right, so you recognize that there are biological differences, but you're saying that culturally the expression of the sex is the gender.
Okay, so there is a difference, but it just, it gets so discombobulated and confusing to the point where they are now denying biological reality between men and women, which is something entirely different than transgenderism.
It's just basic stupidity.
It's just basic, well, like, lie.
I don't know.
I mean, it's just not true.
And it's not accurate.
And it has nothing to do with social constructs.
It's just a fact of life.
Like, what are we doing here?
What is this?
What has gone wrong?
Where's the reset button?
What are we doing?
What are we doing here?
I don't know, man.
I don't know how you're supposed to care about any of this stuff when our Supreme Court can't determine whether or not men are men and women or women.
It's hard to really care about anything else, to be honest with you.
Because it's all like this.
I mean, everything, absolutely everything we deal with is exactly this simple.
And for some reason, the vast majority of the world, apparently, has been driven completely and utterly insane.
And, you know, I don't know, man.
I really don't know what to do about any of this anymore.
We've got stories like this.
Trump has complained about Pam Bondi repeatedly to AIDS.
Like Trump today gave a big speech.
There are all these clips of Trump.
And like, honestly, I don't care.
Like, does anybody listen to me?
Do you care what President Trump said?
He said something about Ilhan Omar.
Okay.
But she's still a congresswoman, okay?
She's still worth tens of millions of dollars for some reason.
Okay, great.
So, who cares what he says?
Oh, he said something about, I don't know, something else.
It's like, who cares?
Like, who cares?
Because he's not, because it's not the same.
It's different when you're not the president and you're on the campaign trail and you're saying things can seem exciting because there's a chance that it's going to come true.
Now you are president.
So I can't really bring myself to care about the threats that you're making because you're in power right now and you're not doing it.
So I've decided, just as you know, professional stance, I'm just going to stop talking about what they're saying.
And one day, God willing, they'll do something and I'll report on that.
All right.
The minute Trump actually does something successfully, then I will eagerly report that.
Until then, I really don't care what else they have to say.
And stories like this: Trump has complained about Pam Bondi repeatedly to AIDS.
Well, okay.
And what does he think the AIDS can fire her?
Is he under the impression that the AIDS are the ones that are in charge?
Trump has repeatedly criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi for perceived ineffectiveness.
Her perceived ineffectiveness in pursuing his agenda, including prosecuting former investigators.
Trump's frustration includes Pam Bondi's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and the Justice Department's perceived slow progress on election-related investigations.
Despite public praise from Trump and his allies, Bondi is reportedly losing support among some of Trump's loyal voters because they of a lack of perceived action.
President Trump has repeatedly criticized Attorney General Pam Bondi for perceived ineffectiveness in pursuing his like.
This is how I feel is like.
You remember that show, was it Hell's Kitchen right?
A guy goes into a, the chef whatever his name is goes into a failing restaurant and he has to tell them what they're doing wrong.
It's like imagine going into a restaurant and they're serving piles of cow poop on plates.
It's like what I'm not gonna do.
This episode, like this is stupid.
You don't need me to tell you that, like you're serving poop on a plate, no one's gonna eat this.
What are you talking about, do you know?
I mean, it's like the problems that you're dealing with are so fundamentally easy to solve.
What are we doing here?
What are we doing here?
I mean, you could pick any any metaphor that we use, the house is on fire, try you know spraying water on it.
Yeah, kitchen nightmares with Gordon Ramsey, if I you know, there were some bad.
There were some bad restaurants there right, mold in the ice machine, rude waiters, you know, just using stale food, that sort of stuff.
But did you ever go into a restaurant?
And it's just like there's no chairs or tables, there's no waiters, they don't have a stove and it's just like a bucket of slime that they scoop stuff out of and throw it at people and it's like well, you're just, you're doing nothing right, you're doing absolutely nothing that you're supposed to be doing.
Absolutely nothing is happening the way it's supposed to.
So where are we even supposed to start?
As far as I can tell, it's not even a restaurant.
This is not even an elected representation of what we voted for, and I don't know it's.
It's a, it's a stupid metaphor, but it's just like It would be one thing if there were these big challenges that we were having to try to solve.
If, like, you know, they're filing stuff repeatedly and it's getting sent back.
And they're so they're trying to get rid of the, you know, judges that are making those decisions, but then other people are interfering.
Like, okay, if it was this really strong battle back and forth, but again, every day, I feel like I come in here and I'm like, the house is still on fire.
And they just haven't connected it to the fire hydrant yet.
Yeah.
Trump's being an idiot sandwich right now.
That's what he's being.
So I'm sorry.
It's just like, how many times are we going to have to read headlines like this?
Yeah, I can't teach you that because it's common sense.
I mean, literally, literally, what are we doing here?
I'm trying to imagine if we hire, like, if I had an employee that I hired, and it's like, I hire them to make cuts and edits of the show and then upload them.
And it's just like a year later, they haven't uploaded a single video.
I paid them to come into the office every single day, every single day.
They're at a computer with editing software open, but they have not once uploaded a single video.
And every week or so, you know, the rumor goes around the office.
It's like, oh, Harrison's kind of mad that this new guy is not doing what he's supposed to be doing.
Oh, you better light a fire under there.
And it's just no videos get uploaded ever, ever, for a year.
And it's like, so what?
So what are we?
So what are we doing here?
What are we doing?
Is that a big problem that would be hard to solve?
It just, I don't know, man.
It's really hard to care about any of this.
This month, Trump has talked with allies about how he could appoint his special counsels at the Justice Department because he's so frustrated with what he sees as slow progress of the work.
People familiar with the matter said, chief among his grievances is what he sees as Bondi's failure to quickly and effectively prosecute the investigators who had pursued him for years, including former FBI director James Comey, New York Attorney General Letitia James.
The officials and other and others familiar with his complaints said both criminal cases were dismissed in November by a judge who said the Trump aide who secured the indictment had been improperly appointed to her post.
Trump has wanted to see the cases continue quickly.
And they don't tell you the full story about how there was already somebody that was accurately appointed, but he was family friends with the Comeys, so he slow walked the whole thing.
So again, you know, do we just say the same stuff over and over?
I, you know, it's just, it just goes on and on.
Folks are desperate for action and just haven't seen it, says Steve Bannon, providing a list of topics that the president supporters want her to bring more cases on, including the 2020 election, Justice Department's investigation, the Trump campaign ties to Russia in the 2016 election.
I mean, yeah, those were the things that were, you know, treason.
Those were the treasonous things that were done to try to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
So, yeah, those should be on the top of the list, but it's just barely scratching the surface of what has actually gone on because not only do you have the Russia collusion hoax, which was absolutely massive and huge.
Obviously, you have the Hunter Biden laptop situation.
Nobody's been punished for that, which obviously was a gigantic deal.
You have the stolen 2020 election.
You have the January 6th committee, and that whole thing was entirely fraudulent.
And they destroyed people's liberties and punished them without ever achieving a conviction.
But you've also got the traitor Alejandro Majorkis that opened up the border and flooded our country with tens of millions of people, totally against law.
He had no right to do that, but he did it anyway.
You've got, I mean, it just goes on and on.
Like, this is just off the top of my head, and I'm barely scratching the surface.
Could probably name 50 different people that like we know they've committed crimes.
It's not speculation.
It's not revenge.
It's not vindictiveness.
It's James Comey leaking information illegally and then lying about it under oath.
We can't charge him for that.
Letitia James just clearly bending the rules to try to get a conviction on Donald Trump, despite that being, again, just a flagrant violation of the oath that she took to impose the law fairly.
So, but then you charge her with, you know, mortgage fraud.
Yeah, I'd be frustrated too, Trump.
I'd be a hell of a lot more frustrated.
And you got to wonder, like, are these stories being planted to try to light a fire under Pam Bondi?
Like, just what is going on?
Just what is going on?
You hired somebody who just is not doing their job, has not once done a single aspect of their job.
Trump has ordered 2,500 Somalis out of the country by March, amid a fallout from Minnesota fraud scheme.
The White House is ending TPS for Somalia, meaning thousands of Somalis in the U.S. under that program must leave after an alleged fraud scheme exploded in Minnesota and made national headlines.
Those affected must leave the country by March 17th.
There are roughly 2,500 Somalis in the U.S. under TPUS.
DHS sources revealed to Fox News.
Just under 1,400 of those are in the country with pending applications.
An investigated 24% of them reside in Minnesota, where immigration and customs enforcement has been carrying out deportation operations in recent weeks.
Somalia is one of the poorest and most dangerous countries in the world, which has been destabilized by Klan division, insurgent groups, and humanitarian crisis since the central government collapsed there in the 1990s.
So obviously we want as many of them over here as possible.
Haitians, Colombians, Venezuelans, Chinese, Africans, Filipinos, Mexicans, Indians, British, and Europeans all polled more positively when it came to asking about Somali immigrants' impacts on the United States.
If any of them want to come in this city and commit a crime, you would not be able to hide.
Nobody will wish you off.
You don't want this smoke.
Because we will bring it to you.
And the fake, whatever they call them, because I can't say the name, but the criminal in the White House would not be able to keep you from going to jail.
There's what's called the 3.5% rule, which is that if you look at authoritarian regimes of various kinds all over the world over the last century, once you have 3.5% of a population protesting nonviolently against a dictator or an authoritarian, that is essentially an unstoppable force that they can't oppose and that precludes them from consolidating dictatorial power.
Why are people showing up in vehicles in convoys, not just in Minneapolis, but all over the country in an effort to obstruct lawful federal law enforcement activities?
Prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any U.S. law or seize or possess by force any property of the United States contrary to its authority.
The definition of treason is explicitly defined in the U.S. Constitution, Article 3, Section 3, and codified in 18 U.S. Code 2381, consisting of levying war against the United States or adhering to the enemies of the United States, giving them aid and comfort.
I thought this tweet from Dissident West was very much how I feel.
From at Dissident West on Twitter.
Not trying to sound blackpilled, but it's becoming increasingly obvious this administration's goal is not mass deportations.
It's to turn the public off from that idea so it's never even mentioned again.
Everything they do from the deportation edits to stuff like this, and it's a video of them arresting like a 17-year-old working at Target or something, is to create the worst optics imaginable so that the Overton window shifts back to where it was before.
If deportations were their actual way, were their actual goal, there's a million better ways to do it that wouldn't come off as so openly cruel.
Either that or they're grotesquely incompetent, but I don't think that's the case.
And then, you know, I've heard other people, I saw a clip from Nick Fuentez's show yesterday where he's going, you know, you guys are crying crocodile tears at this dumb lady that got shot trying to run a cop over.
Like, what?
You got to harden your hearts.
Or other people, you know, well, we are Trump supporters, but these deportations, we really can't stand.
And it's not that I'm against deportations because I think they're particularly cruel or something.
I don't.
I think these people are criminals and they can leave the country whenever they want.
It's not actually that hard to not find yourself in this situation.
You have to really make a lot of deliberate choices to find yourself here.
So I don't actually feel bad for them at all.
But I am concerned about the ability of the left to portray this as something brutal.
I don't like that they seem to be doing stuff that is designed to deliberately aggravate the left.
I don't think it's the most efficient or effective use of manpower.
And it's certainly, I mean, it's not a question that the rate at which deportations are happening, we're not even making a dent.
We're not even making a dent.
We've deported like 300,000 people this year.
10 times that would be necessary just to get us back to where we were in 2020, which even that might, I might even be underselling it.
Like, we might even need more than that to get back to where we were.
And that doesn't even count the fact that illegal immigration was such a big issue that it was the number one thing Trump talked about when he was getting elected in 2016.
So, just to get back to 2016 numbers, we'd need like millions and millions a day.
So, the deportations are not happening fast enough, but they are happening in a way that provides for the most amount of chaos, the most amount of interference, the most amount of dangerous situations where people can and have been hurt or killed.
So, is that the plan?
Is that what they're doing?
And can you sort of apply this to everything Trump is doing when he says either they're grossly incompetent or this is on purpose?
I mean, kind of the same thing.
And maybe at the end of the day, that'll be a good thing.
Maybe at the end of the day, that really is what we need.
Maybe we really do need to just fully lose hope in our system so we can stop relying on it and form something new.
Maybe in the long run, this is a positive.
I would have liked to see Trump cross the Rubicon, go all in, start up a new law enforcement agency, stick it on his enemies, charge them with the crimes they've committed in courts with judges you can trust, and just get it done.
That would have been really, really wonderful.
But at this point, it really seems like the lesson that they're trying to teach America is like this whole voting for somebody that's against this thing doesn't work.
Voting for somebody that's going to, you know, totally rearrange things and set things right, it's not actually possible in this system.
So, you might as well just vote for Jeb.
You might as well just vote for Lindsay or something, so you can at least get yours.
But, yeah, we just need to, I guess, come to terms with Trump's failure at this point.
It's been a year, and it's not getting any better.
And it's actually only getting worse, and it's particularly disheartening because we see what awaits us.
We see, you know, what's coming next.
If you look at Australia, which has always been the testing ground for the New World Order since the gun control confiscation in the 90s, I mean, that's been where they roll out their most authoritarian control systems from glycine nationalist on X. Everybody in the Anglosphere, America, and Western Europe needs to be watching what's going on in Australia.
The government is passing there under parliamentary urgency the most draconian and illiberal, quote, anti-hate censorship and repression laws in the entire Western world.
Australia will soon be more repressive than Britain or Germany.
A true multicultural police state, the government is using the Bondi massacre by Islamists who killed not only Jewish people, but white Australians to justify going after the nationalist right.
These new laws will take effect retroactively and essentially allow the home office minister to ban any right-wing organization that it does not like.
Breaking these laws will carry a penalty of seven years in prison.
He says the point of the legislation in Australia is to make nationalism illegal effectively and to demoralize nationalists into accepting mass migration.
They're going to make examples out of NSN, which is the National Socialist Party there in Australia, in order to terrorize the Australian people.
This is left-wing state terrorism.
That's exactly what it is.
And Again, like maybe this, maybe this also will turn out to be a good thing because what's happened already is that the national nationalist organizations in Australia are already debanding, disbanding, because they're basically saying that if this group exists, when this law goes into effect, they'll all be charged with crimes, just being a part of a group.
You don't have to actually ever have committed a crime.
It's just they label a group as now illegal, and anybody who's a member of that group has therefore committed a crime.
So obviously, this is just blatant government repression of a political perspective.
There's really no other way to view this.
But do you think the people that are in these groups are going to stop their efforts?
I mean, they'll just have to go underground.
Maybe it'll be a good thing.
You know, maybe this will prepare people for the future because things are only getting worse.
They're only getting more authoritarian, more restrictive.
Maybe it'll be useful to learn how to communicate in secret to keep things offline to build networks in the shadows that you don't make public at all because even awareness of the group will mean a crackdown by authorities.
So some tactics are going to have to change, but it's absolutely brutal what Australia is implementing with their combating anti-Semitism hate and extremism bill.
This is a thread from Australians versus the Agenda.
The Combating Anti-Semitism Hate and Extremism Bill 2026 has been published and it's worse than you think.
It criminalizes speech that merely causes fear, even if no harm occurs.
Five years in prison.
Five years in prison for causing fear.
Whatever that means.
This is the, they call it the exposure draft that's been leaked to the public.
It defines public place so broadly that it includes the internet, meaning posts, video, tweets, memes, and blogs all fall within the scope.
So again, basically, they're saying you can't say certain things in public.
And what they mean by public is any electronic communication whatsoever.
A person commits an offense if A, the person engages in conduct in a public place, and B, the person engages in the conduct intending to one, promote or incite hatred of another person or group of persons because of the race, color, national, or ethnic origin of the target or target group, or two, disseminate ideas of superiority over or hatred of another group or person or group of persons because of the race, color, national, or ethnic group or target or target group.
I mean, obviously, they're not going to go after brown people for causing hatred of white people.
After all, we've gone viral pretty recently.
Was the Australian neighborhood with a big mural of a brown girl killing a white guy in a British uniform?
I seriously doubt that will come under the purview of this.
In fact, I'm almost certain it won't.
The law states it's irrelevant whether hatred actually occurs or whether anyone truly felt fear.
Doesn't matter.
It doesn't matter.
It says definitions in this section engages in conduct in a public place without limiting when a person engages in conduct in a public place.
A person engages the conduct in a public place if the person communicates to the public using any form of communication, graffiti, playing recorded material, or broadcasting your information.
For the purpose of subsection one, it is immaterial whether A, the target or members of the target group actually are distinguished by their particular race, color, national, or ethnic group, or B, the conduct actually results in hatred of another person or group of persons, or C, the conduct actually results in any person feeling intimidated, feeling harassment, or violence, or fearing for their safety.
Like, what?
So they are literally making anything and everything illegal.
They're saying it's illegal to cause hatred or fear, but also you don't actually have to cause hatred or fear to be guilty.
whether the people are actually distinguished by a particular race, color, national, ethnic origin.
So it's like you're not allowed to target a specific person on the basis of the national origin, but it's immaterial whether that's actually the case or not.
Okay, what is this law?
You are guilty of displaying a prohibited symbol unless you can prove a religious, academic, or journalistic exemption.
Gee, I wonder what symbols they mean there.
Critics condemn loopholes.
Well, there are loopholes.
There are very deliberate and expansive loopholes specifically carved out for the people that committed the terrorist attack that this law is being based on.
Wrap your mind around that one.
The AFP minister can declare prohibited groups without procedural fairness, including relying on retroactive conduct.
That power can extend to actions that occurred outside Australia.
Penalties include up to seven years in prison if you have membership in a prohibited group.
Sentences to as much as 15 years for supporting, training, recruiting, or funding a banned group.
And hate preachers get a loophole exemption for the purpose of religious teaching or discussion.
So the hate speech law that's being passed on the basis of this Islamist attack in Bondi Beach is to basically criminalize white Australians from advocating for themselves.
From OzPill at Oz underscore pill.
Australia's response to the Islamic attack on Bondi Beach just dropped, and there's not one mention of Islam, despite instead, it seems to specifically protect Islamic hate preachers via religious exemptions.
The bill otherwise vaguely cracks down on free speech and right-wing political organizations in the name of, quote, combating anti-Semitism.
There's heaps of insane stuff like criminalizing speech based on fear, including if it was on the internet.
Ministers being able to list organizations as prohibited hate groups based on retrospective evidence without procedural fairness and with jail time ranging from 7 to 14 years as a consequence of assisting or being a member of such groups.
Far-right political groups have already been earmarked to fall under this designation.
Our so-called conservative party, the Liberal Party, has already vowed to support the bill.
It's unknown how many other supposedly right-wing parties will do the same.
They are literally using an Islamic terror attack to go after free speech in right-wing groups, things that they wanted to do regardless, now that they have the moral justification of, quote, combating anti-Semitism, which they hope will fool large swaths of regular Aussies into blindly agreeing with egregious attacks on our society.
If this bill goes to a debate, the bill goes to a debate in the coming days.
Heaps more info on the bill and resources on political and Australian politics in this thread.
So, I mean, again, you know, it's just it's as insane as everything else we cover.
Some people are looking at this, you know, the silver lining on the cloud.
Like I just said, you know, this will actually sharpen the ability of the National Socialists there in Australia to operate under the radar, but it will obviously massively hamper.
But again, there is nothing explicit about, you know, a group like the National Socialists, sort of like the neo-Nazi, I guess you could call them party, And your average Australian patriot or any conservative group.
Essentially, all they're saying is that if you aren't in favor of your people's displacement and dispossession of your country, then you're a hate group.
Like if you're against migrants at any level for any reason, you're a hate group.
So they're just codifying right now in Australia the political landscape where only deconstructionists, only anti-white, anti-European, anti-Australian, anti-American people can actually have a voice and speak out.
And they're actually making it illegal to organize if you're not one of those groups.
This is a fundamental attack on the very concept of freedom of speech, freedom of conscience in the Western world.
And we really have to oppose this with everything we've got.
And it is coming here if we aren't careful.
And I've got some videos about this.
Guys, did you have time to censor clip 23?
Let's go to clip 23 here.
unidentified
The massive failing that is Australia's multicultural soup and the immigration Ponzi scheme that we run here created guys like this who perpetrate events like mass shootings on a Jewish event in Australia.
And in order to combat that, our government decides to push through emergency legislation that's going to empower this guy, the Minister for Home Affairs, who loves mass immigration and whose electorate is in a place where 60% of their households don't have English as a first language.
They're going to decide who is and isn't the enemy in society anymore.
And then they're going to bring down the full force of the law against them.
This legislation will create a new framework that will enable the Minister for Home Affairs to list organizations as prohibited hate groups.
And once an organization is listed, it will be a criminal offense to be a member, recruit for, donate to it, or receive funds that support that group in any way.
Or go out on a limb here and assume that that's going to be anyone who disagrees with mass immigration and the Nazis because, you know, the Nazis are dangerous.
Frication of Australia continues unabated by your elected officials.
What's even is that it has bipartisan support.
We don't effectively have an opposition party in Australia.
It was pretty clear to me last year, especially after October 19th, that they were going to do everything they could to try and shut down the end mass immigration movement in Australia.
It was pretty obvious to me.
I knew that they were going to start locking people up.
The fact that they threw Joel Davis in jail and have effectively kept him as a political prisoner, regardless of how I might feel about him and the organization that he represents, is completely and utterly wrong.
And it shouldn't be happening.
However, it's about to get 100 times worse.
They're going to be locking up people left, right, and center.
In fact, I can't even guarantee that I won't be on a list to be locked up.
However, I'm trying to play a straight bat here and work within the system and the framework that these keep creating for us, as hard as that may be.
If you're operating on the fringes and if you are going to do that's considered spicy, I would suspect that you're probably going to end up in jail.
And I'll be honest with you, if you end up in jail, if you end up dead, if you end up losing everything you own in this game, this game of thrones for control of our country, then you've lost the game.
If it looks like that's where you're about to end up, then you should seriously consider the way you're playing the game because you're going to lose.
I believe that we can win without losing everything, without going to jail and without everybody dying.
However, we all need to do this together.
That's why you should join the Australian lobby group.
Where you've spoken about expressions of race, colour, and national or ethnic origin.
And it says on the fourth line there, for example, those of Jewish origin would be protected by the offence.
Given that Jewish people, I could convert to Judaism, how then do you suggest that you'll be protecting Jewish people of different ethnic origins under this legislation?
So you would be satisfied that using that basis, that people chanting Gas the Jews or Death to Jews, that that would encompass that group of people, despite them, you know, it might be a Ukrainian Jewish person or a person from Israel.
Yes, so we're satisfied that that reference to persons or groups distinguished by race, colour, or national or ethnic origin encompasses Jewish people.
I mentioned that I think there has been consideration that it will apply to Sikhs as also an ethno-religious group.
And in other contexts, it would depend on the broader range of characteristics.
But being Catholic alone would not constitute race, colour, national, or ethnic origin.
But it might be that in certain circumstances, if there are broader other considerations that met those individuals formed part of one of those groups, that would be covered.
I mean, they're literally making it illegal to advocate for white Australians' continuing existence while empowering every other group with not just the ability to say whatever the hell they want, no matter how hateful it is, but the money to do it too, as they're all getting grants from the Australian government as we speak.
Where everything's stupid and backwards as put on display there, dang the Olympics.
I'm actually going to take your calls for the second half of today's episode of The War Room.
I am going to ask that our regular callers hold off.
I know you got us on speed dial, but if you've never gotten on the show before, if you've never called in or never made it on the show, give us a call.
The number to dial is 1877-789-2539, 1877-789-2539.
And we'll take your calls.
I want to continue on the Australian hate speech bill for a little bit.
Let's go to clip 39 now, because this, I think, again, just exposes the absurdity of the law that Australia is attempting to pass as we speak.
I would actually push back a little bit on what you said, Caleb, in that some of the legislation you think was good in terms of displaying terrorist symbols.
Because if you look up in the USA, the ADL's list of what they deem as terrorism symbols or hate symbols, one of them is White Lives Matter.
The other one is Thor's Hammer.
A third one is Celtic crosses.
Being Celt myself, I fight like it's outrageous to me that there is somebody in some form of authority somewhere across the world who deems a Celtic cross as a form of hate symbol.
And so you've got to always look at what precedes and hopefully heed warning and example.
And if you look across the world, what's happening, we would be naive and stupid to think that it isn't possible happening here.
I mean, who defines this?
See, because if people are afraid to speak out loud and they think they're going to end up in prison, we're not going to be able to discuss ideas.
We can't say, you know what, immigration is a bad idea because that could be racist.
We're not allowed to say that.
I think it's really bad women are in, you know, trans women are in, you know, biological women sports because then we're, you know, some kind of phobe.
Like, where does it end?
And I think it's very dangerous.
Fear is enough to curb democracy.
And if everyday Australians are fearful that they can't speak freely and discuss these hard ideas, then they're not going to have a proper democracy here.
And we're literally ruled by whoever deems whatever is hate in a court of law.
Evelyn Ray, we'll lose our home, we'll lose our people, lose our culture, because basically it's whoever decides what hate is.
And it can change.
And, you know, once you allow them to determine one thing is hate and therefore not a valid political position to have, it's going to expand and it's going to expand rapidly.
And, you know, sure, the Nationalist Socialists have shut down their network and shut down their group.
Do you think they're going to be the only ones that are targeted by this?
Whatever other group comes next, I mean, this is about actually shutting that Overton window, like drawing a hardcore line and going, you're allowed to talk about and advocate things up to this point, but beyond that, it's illegal and you'll go to jail.
And we aren't going to tell you exactly where that line is.
So you be careful not to cross or else you and your entire group and everybody in your group is going to jail.
Because now, since you said that one thing, now your group is a hate group.
Now everybody in your group is a criminal.
So don't cross that line or else you and everybody you're a part of will be arrested.
And even if it doesn't go that far, you can just look at what they're doing with like AFD in Germany.
If a right-wing group gets popular, it'll be allowed to get popular up to a certain point and then suddenly it'll become dangerous.
It'll become a hatemonger group.
And whoever's in charge of that particular moment will be able to claim that they are hateful and shut them down.
Now, the flip side of this would be that you could like rewrite this law to not have all of the explicit carve-outs and caveats for Islamists.
And then you could, you know, arrest them for their speech.
I would hate to see this become a arms race of who can ban their enemies' ideas first, but right now it's just one side is banning the other side's ideas.
Maybe we need to take a lesson from that, perhaps.
We've got a few more videos about this.
Let's go to clip 29 here.
This is George Memelis saying Australia is in no way a democracy.
The bill is the Combating Anti-Semitism, Hate and Extremism Bill.
It's a comprehensive package of reforms which creates serious offenses for hate preachers and leaders seeking to radicalize young Australians.
It increases the penalties for hate crimes offences.
It ensures that offenders whose crimes were motivated by extremism have that factored into their sentencing.
It creates a new offence for inciting hatred in order to intimidate or harass.
It expands and strengthens the ban on prohibited symbols and it makes it easier for the Minister for Home Affairs to cancel or refuse a visa for people intent on spreading hatred.
And it creates a new framework that will enable the Minister for Home Affairs to list organisations as prohibited hate groups.
Once an organisation is listed, it will be a criminal offense to be a member, to recruit for it, to donate or receive funds or support that group in any way.
The legislation will also set up the National Guns Buyback Scheme, bringing Australia's world-leading gun laws into the 21st century.
The terrorists at Bondi Beach had hatred in their minds, but guns in their hands.
This law will deal with both.
unidentified
I warned all of you that we're going to use the NSN to call these laws in.
This Prime Minister has done more damage to the Australian people than two radical Islamists ever could with guns.
Now the Prime Minister has recalled Parliament early to rush through what is the most extreme speech laws Australia has ever seen.
The so-called combating anti-Semitism, hate and extremism bill 2026.
But here's what they don't want discussed.
These laws introduce a built-in exemption that allows hate preachers to escape punishment as long as what they say is framed as religious teaching or religious discussion.
Islam can still spread.
Ordinary Australians can be punished for symbols or speech, while extremist preaching is protected by a religious purpose loophole.
And here's the truth no one wants to admit.
The window to stop this is already closing.
Parliament is performative.
The prime minister controls the lower house.
The deals are already done in the upper house.
Next week isn't democracy.
It's theater.
Let's be honest about who these laws fall on.
Ordinary Australians.
People speaking about what they're seeing in their own communities.
Rising crimes, social breakdown, public disorder, practices imported from overseas that clash with Australian values.
A country is not a democracy when speech exists only by permission.
Yeah, I mean, it really is getting bad all across Western Europe.
So bad, the Pope is even sounding off about it.
Pope Leo, free speech is being eliminated in the West under Orwellian-style censorship.
Orwellian-style censorship.
Pope Leo the 14th used his annual address to foreign diplomats at the Vatican to issue a stark warning that struck to the heart of the Western political order.
The first American pontiff cautioned that freedom of expression in the West is contracting under the liberal globalist banner of so-called progress and inclusion.
According to the Pope, Western societies for a long time have drifted and continued to drift towards enforced consensus rather than open debate.
He's exactly right.
It's getting really bad.
Of course, we had the member of the AFD on yesterday talking about how bad it's getting in Germany.
He reminded us that today, an editor-in-chief of the Alternative for Germany newsletter or newspaper is now facing a very long time in prison over a meme where he took a picture of his enemy's party.
She's holding a sign.
He wrote, I hate freedom of speech, and they arrested him for that.
He may be going to jail.
The appeal is happening right now.
Another appeal was just denied in Brussels.
Seven-month sentence for a political meme heads to appeal in Germany.
This is that same one I was just talking about, but I want to go to video 43 here.
This is Dries, I can't remember his last name, Van Legenhove, I think.
I'll find it on the other side.
But here he is talking about being sentenced to potentially years in prison for private messages that were shared in a group chat that he was a member in.
The bad news is that free speech is officially dead in Brussels.
Today, the politically appointed Supreme Court has ignored all of the grave injustices committed against me and approved my prison sentence for racist memes in a private group chat.
The good news is that eight years of show trials, house raids, and other terror inflicted upon me by the Brussels regime has mentally prepared me to take this final big injustice on the chin and immediately get ready to hand out counterpunches.
I am not backing down.
There are 12 more criminal investigations and court cases for hate speech running against me, and none of them will ever stop me from fighting the Brussels regime and the great replacement.
If you are with me until victory, share this video.
Show the world how the Brussels regime is killing freedom of speech in the heart of Europe and show the world that resistance is alive and kicking.
Oh, and by the way, this building behind me, the Palace of Justice where the Supreme Court resides, was designed by a very corrupt Freemason who deliberately made it way too big because it had to be bigger than the St. Peter's Basilica in Rome to show the supposed victory of the Freemasons over the church.
But just like today, their victory will be short-lived.
The Freemasons Palace of Justice, or injustice would be more correct, is literally collapsing from the inside out and impossible to repair.
They had to install scaffolding to support the previous scaffolding.
And just as this palace behind me is collapsing, the Brussels regime will soon collapse, no matter how many people they throw in jail for their opinion.
On the one hand, you're being attacked by radical Islamists who make an alliance with these progressives who supposedly call for human rights.
How can they support human rights when they support these murderers, the people who invaded us, who slaughtered our men, beheaded them, raped women, and then murdered them, burnt babies alive?
You saw them also in Syria, these jihadists who tore out a heart from a Druze.
It's a non-Muslim sect in Syria.
You see this horrible video of this person cutting open the chest of a wounded Druze is still alive and eating his heart out before he dies.
I mean, this is barbar.
This is early Middle Ages.
And so these people who speak of human rights, these progressives, are actually supporting the worst murderers on the planet.
So that's one side of the attack.
And the other is people on an extreme right that is also developing that are supporting them.
These are not the people that we would call conservatives or people who want to support the Judeo-Christian tradition on which our free civilization is based.
And that's why we have to stand together, as I said before.
We're talking, you're supposed to be talking about political landscape that you're dealing with.
And you just spent half of that two-minute clip describing somebody cutting somebody's heart out.
Okay, what?
By the way, let's go to clip 41 here.
I just want to go to clip 41 real quick.
Before we move on to talk about what Benjamin Netanyahu just said, I just want to show you a video from today there in Hebron, which is part of occupied Palestine.
Let's watch.
Okay, here we have some IDF soldiers attempting to detain a child, little boy.
Firing at the little boy for running away from you.
So, I don't know.
So, I'm sorry, what?
You were talking about being some sort of moral superior, Mr. Netanyahu?
Something about somebody cutting somebody's heart out?
I don't know.
All I know is every single day, I see more and more videos of little kids being murdered by the IDF.
So, morally, you're not any better than the Muslims.
Frankly, I think in a lot of ways you're worse.
And a lot of ways, the things that you describe, Mr. Netanyahu, oh, the poor Druze having his heart cut out, did that happen under Bashir al-Assad, or did that happen after you spent 15 years getting al-Assad out of the country so you could replace him with Islamists who then went on to carry out the attacks against the Druze and the Christians and any other ethnic minority within Syria.
So, it's like, okay, even the thing that you're describing is a direct consequence of your actions and your behavior.
So, again, what are we talking about here?
And I think it's interesting that he sees a pincer move from the Red-Green Alliance on one side, progressive and the Islamists on one side, and the right-wing anti-Semites on the other.
I see a completely different pincer move.
I see a pincer move, and we can take Australia as maybe the best example, where you've got Muslims who hate white Christians carrying out a terrorist attack, and then you have Jewish groups weaponizing that terrorist attack to pass legislation that they'd been working on for months already anyway, that made it illegal to oppose the Jewish lobby in Australia or to advocate for Australian heritage at all.
That's the pincer move I see.
I see a pincer move of Islamists and Jews working together, if not as partners, certainly as a feedback loop that is robbing us of our free speech, despite the fact that this is not our battle and not our fight.
And we're not on either side at the end of the day.
Am I wrong about what pincer move is happening here?
Seems pretty blatant to me.
And you have to understand how ruthless this is.
Because it's one thing to say, you know, you can't be an anti-Semi, no, no anti-Semitism.
And then it's like, okay, well, what if we just advocate for ourselves?
We don't hate anybody.
We don't even have to advocate against anybody.
What if we're just in favor of white people and want white people to do well and want to advocate for white people?
Well, you can't do that because at one point there was a state that, you know, is proud of being white and they didn't like Jews and they did the Holocaust.
So because of the Holocaust, now being pro-white at all is de facto in and of itself anti-Semitic.
And again, it's happening really in every Western country at this point.
These laws are being put into place.
And so you have the Muslims flooding in and making things worse.
The white people reacting to it.
And then that reaction being made illegal by the Jewish groups and their lobbying efforts all over the world.
Or, you know, like Benjamin Netanyahu himself.
I mean, after Bondi, it was Benjamin Netanyahu himself who came out to make speeches saying, I expect a raft of anti-Semitic, you know, banning legislation to be passed on the basis of this.
So that's the pincer attack.
Pincer attack is against white people and specifically white men.
And it's from the Islamists and the progressives, who obviously hate white people more than anything and only really hate Jews as an accident because they consider them white.
And the other side being the so-called conservative Jewish groups that have taken over the Republican Party and are, you know, systematically eliminating anybody that wants to preserve white countries or Christian institutions.
So I do see a pincer move.
I just don't see it being aimed at Israel or the Jewish people.
Let's go to clip 27 here.
This is Dave Smith going off about some of this.
As again, I just want to re-emphasize how utterly fraudulent and ridiculous, quite frankly, the moral superiority of the Israelis truly is.
Yeah, it's again, it's like, wait, now you care about the Iranian people.
You just want them to be free.
Like, it's all, it's just all so unbelievably fraudulent.
That's the only word for it.
It really is.
We're not going to quite have time to go to that clip 15 that I wanted to go to.
We'll go to it on the other side because, again, it just talks about how we've been lied into every war since Vietnam, but it's worse than that, folks.
We have been lied into every war.
Maybe the Civil War was kind of clear-cut.
But, folks, you ever heard of the Maine?
You ever heard of Remember the Maine?
I mean, the Maine, the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, they knew was going to happen and did nothing to stop it, allowed it to take place so they could have the Cassas Bellai to get into war.
Vietnam, the Gulf of Tonkin, totally fraudulent.
Weapons of mass destruction, totally fraudulent.
I mean, I don't know if there's been a war that America has been involved in since the Civil War that was not predicated or initiated on an absolute, abject, blatant lie.
Because people don't want war.
You have to lie people into it.
The lie now is that we somehow care about the Iranian people, that it's for their sake that we want to overthrow their country.
I don't think that's the case, actually.
I think this is just brutal Realpolitik conquering of a country for the sake of another country.
It's not that complicated.
It's certainly not beneficent or an act of goodwill or an act of charity on the world stage, but that's how it's being presented because people are evil liars.
We are going to go out to your phone calls for the entirety of the third hour.
I'm sorry, thank you for holding, but we'll go to calls just as soon as we get back.
I do want to remind you to go to thealxjonesstore.com today.
I've got this beautiful looking knife that should be sitting out on my desk this whole time, actually.
It comes with this sort of collector's edition box with the silver filigree on it.
Is that the right word?
I think it is.
And it's actually this beautiful trench knife.
I believe it's sold 50% off on the alexjones store.com.
Go to thealxjonstore.com slash Harrison.
Listen to this.
You know that?
It snaps in.
It's a very high-tech and very lightweight belt holster here.
40% off right now.
So get it while you can at thealxjones store.com slash Harrison.
Dilbert, his cartoon creation, has offered a sardonic look at contemporary corporate culture and the plight of the modern-day office worker.
It has become the fastest-growing comic strip in syndication, appearing in more than 1,900 newspapers with a worldwide readership of about 150 million.
With its success, the Dilbert phenomenon has transcended the comic page.
In the past three years, a cartoon has spanned a vast empire, which includes best-selling books, an internet site, and over 700 Dilbert-inspired products.
In January, the animated television series debuted on UPN, and here is a clip from the series.
unidentified
Mom?
In here, dear.
Push a little harder.
Get your shoulder into it.
Mom, what are you doing?
Stockpiling.
Stockpiling?
Why?
Where have you been?
Haven't you heard about Y2K?
Heard of it?
I'm in charge of fixing the bug for my whole company.
You are.
God help them.
Thanks, Mom.
Maybe you should start hoarding essential supplies before it's too late.
Why are you hoarding hair conditioner?
I had a coupon.
Mom, it would be a lot easier to talk to you if I could see you.
I'm not here.
I'm at the Warehouse Shopping Club with a moving van.
Am I so predictable you can record your side of the conversation in advance?
Yes, you are so predictable, I can record my side of the conversation in advance.
Well, for me, it was the shortest version of the story is that I was working at Pacific Bell in my little cubicle, and one day I bought a book on how to become a cartoonist.
I'd always been a doodler, and I read the directions in the book, and it tells you how to send off your cartoons to various syndication companies.
And I sent off my little photocopies to half a dozen companies.
And United Media called me and said, How would you like to be a syndicated cartoonist?
Oh, yeah, because I remember when just the story of right before the Jews crucified Jesus, they told the disciples, you know, you might want to sell your cloak and buy yourself a sword.
We are, I tell you, it's that time of year where, you know, the tax stamp's down to zero.
So people are trying to get their suppressors.
They're trying to do form one, their SBRs and stuff like that because they don't have to pay that $200 tax stamp anymore.
But I'm kind of upset with the administration because the Trump administration, they're in control of the White House.
They have the House.
The Republicans have the House.
They have the Senate.
And I'm upset because they have all three branches and we shouldn't have to, you know, register suppressors or register, you know, shortbread rifles or short barrel shotguns.
We should be able to walk into the gun store, whatever, walk into anywhere and just, you know, and buy one of those.
You know, you shouldn't have to go through that process.
So people are actually going everywhere they can to find themselves a suppressor, a silencer, whatever you want to call it.
And they're trying to get them.
And the ATF, they're actually crashing the website.
You can't even do the paperwork during the day.
It's very difficult.
So actually for my customers, I'm going in at 11 o'clock, 12 o'clock, 1 o'clock in the morning and processing the paperwork and uploading it, you know, sending it to the ATF to get it done then.
And it does seem like, I mean, the problem with gun control of this country is just like so many other things with the government, it's like a ratchet, right?
It's like it only goes one direction.
They're only ever tightening down our gun control.
Now that we have the House and the Senate, is there ever even a discussion of, hey, let's roll back some of the restraints?
No, we need to keep the pressure on the Department of Justice.
We need to keep the pressure on with the Trump administration and said, hey, you know, you're now in control.
You have this year to, you know, really, you have until like March, April, that first, the first 90 days here of this year to make sure that we pass something.
We need to pass a bill.
It does not need to be executive order because the next president that comes in office can just sign something the first 24 hours and just negate that.
So we need Congress to create a bill, a law, and put it into place where you don't have to register your SBRs.
You don't have to register your suppressors or your silencers or whatever.
You can just, you know, just walk in and get it and walk out.
I really would love for them to pass constitutional carry across all 50 states.
That would be beautiful where you don't need a license at all.
But I don't think they have the appetite for it.
I mean, they can't even vote on a speaker of the house.
So I'm at the point now where, okay, it's baby steps.
I'll settle for a consili, you know, for a conciliatory carry reciprocity.
You know, at least let my license be recognized in all 50 states.
You know, I'll settle for that right now.
And then later on down the road, we'll go back and hit constitutional carry.
So in fact, we should have constitutional carry across all 50 states.
I should be able to walk into New York into California and carry whatever gun, whatever magazine capacity I want to, an AR-15 with third-round magazine without having to California it and walk in and out of that state.
And eventually, you end up totally defenseless, which I think, you know, I think people that didn't care about guns before, I mean, they see the way things are going and they see the way that justice is denied people these days.
I mean, I'm not going to trust the police to defend me right now.
I need to defend myself.
I think more people are waking up and realizing that.
Again, are you seeing a lot of new customers?
Are you seeing people who already have guns doubling down?
Because, like I said, I'm thinking about self-defense right now and I'm buying new guns and making sure I always am carrying.
Yeah, what I'm seeing is when you have the president of the United States, you have the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of the War, pull all your general officers together, put them in the same room, and they release the fact that they're talking about the PT program, fat soldiers.
You know, I call, you know, bull.
You know, that's not what they're talking about.
They're talking about something else.
So something is being planned, something is going on, and people need to wake up.
You need to get yourself ready.
You need to get yourself some guns.
You need to get yourself some ammunition.
You need to make sure you have your food, your water, your family's ready.
There's a plan in place.
You know, have an emergency plan or something like that because something is on the horizon.
And I don't know if it's aliens.
I don't know what's going on, but something is happening and you need to be prepared for it because there's no way in the world that the United States, the president of the United States, the Secretary of War, is going to pull general officers, every single general officer from around the world and pull them into a room to discuss fat soldiers.
Well, and so there's got to be a different reason they're getting together and we should be concerned about that.
And I guess, what do you think about the leftists now that have suddenly discovered their love of the Second Amendment because they're fantasizing about going out and killing ICE patrols?
Because it's this weird, this weird inversion of everything where now we, as the libertarian, you know, pro-liberty people are cheering on the federal agents, but it's because they're actually, you know, enforcing the law.
They're not going after American citizens.
They're not trying to take our guns.
They're doing what must be done for the safety of America.
But on the other hand, you've got the leftists going, this is what the Second Amendment's all about.
Maybe now they'll actually understand why we have the Second Amendment, even though they're just completely off the mark with it when it comes to ICE.
I mean, how do you see things progressing here?
Because I also see, like, all right, if people start getting guns and going to shoot up ICE officers on a regular basis, that that's going to lead to gun control.
Like, I see everything the left is doing now just directly contributing to whatever efforts for tyranny that are coming down the pipe.
Yeah, you're just going to, you know, you're going to open up the door and you're going to, you know, let this president, you know, release, you know, the National Guard and stuff like that.
And we really shouldn't be to that point at all.
So we got to be very careful, you know, not to push, you know, this president's not playing around.
You know, we look, look at, you know, what happened with Venezuela.
You know, if you, if you've had learned anything at all, you know, listen to the people when they talk about, you know, what happened, the weapons that were used and the effectiveness and how everything was shut down, all the power was actually cut off.
You know, this, the military, you know, Secretary Hexev, you know, he's not playing around.
He's actually growing the Department of War to a serious killer machine.
You know, I look at Russia, you know, that country.
They should have been able to wipe, you know, Ukraine off the face of the planet within a matter of days, but they couldn't do that.
You know, you're really not a superpower.
The United States, we are a superpower.
We are a force to be reckoned with.
You know, when we can walk into a country and eliminate your military, kill The security people for the president of that country and snatch him out of his bed in the middle of the night.
You better recognize that this is the United States of America and we're not around.
It seems like it sort of changed the whole like dynamic of international relations.
I mean, I know if I was Putin, I'd be going, oh, geez, maybe I'm not as safe as I thought I was.
Because I mean, and I don't know if we've gone over some of the details on this show yet, but uh, there was that account from one of the security guards.
I mean, it sounds like an alien invasion.
It was like suddenly all the lights go out, suddenly all their phones disconnect, they all start bleeding out of their nose and mouth.
I mean, it sounded crazy.
And you know, you it's in the middle of a capital city in wartime.
They've got every, I mean, they spent $8 billion on defensive, you know, radar systems.
None of it helped.
So, I mean, that's gotta send a chill down the spine of Zhijin being here, Vladimir Putin.
If you're Cuba, you should be very worried, right?
You know, worried right now.
If you are any, you know, anyone that's in our crosshairs, you better be very concerned because I'm telling you right now, this president is not playing at all.
And that's what's that's the one thing that upsets me.
You know, I wish, I wish we had him on our side when he came to the Second Amendment like that.
I wish the way he's attacking these other countries, which we probably need to because we need those resources, but we need to do that when it comes to the home front.
We need to care about the people on the home front, you know, Americans right here.
You know, and we have, you know, and the gun store, we've been there like 18 years and we have all kinds of things that actually happen at the gun store where we have gangs, you know, from Houston, Texas drive over, try to break into the gun store, you know, doing COVID and stuff like that.
You know, we've had, you know, people try to get guns to try to commit mass shootings.
You have all kinds of things.
So it's always something.
And so, you know, we always kind of, you know, educate ourselves when it comes to security, when it comes to, you know, technology and stuff like that.
And we try to grow every single year, you know, to something better.
Yeah, from people that are sitting outside the gun store that are smoking crack, people that are, you know, walking by trying to, you know, get in through the door at three or four o'clock in the morning.
I mean, I had a situation where, you know, a guy actually tried to break into the gun store probably about two or three months ago, and he broke the speaker that we use to communicate with people outside the building.
He got away about four o'clock that day.
The 7-Eleven down the street called me up and said, Hey, Mike, we got this guy that you said, you know, broke at the gun store.
Yeah, you have these cities, the major cities are filled with these DAs or district attorneys who are being funded by Soros or whoever, and they're not prosecuting, you know, people that need to prosecute.
Instead, they want to prosecute police officers who are actually trying to do their job.
And so, that's the one thing that, you know, we're having a huge problem with.
You know, you have people that are repeat offenders, sex offenders, people that are breaking into businesses that are graduating to the next phase, and they're not prosecuting these people at all.
And that's going to be the problem.
And we need to get rid of these DAs, these district attorneys, these county attorneys, and especially, you know, in Texas, you know, all your major cities, it's like this major liberal mecca, you know, and we really need to, people need to wake up and get to the polls, go vote and get rid of these people and get them out of office.
You need to figure out how you're going to draw your firearm.
If you need to pull that gun out of your concealed carry position, pull out your holster, how are you going to do that?
You know, what are steps going to take for you to actually pull that gun out?
Do you have a safety on the firearm?
You know, do you have to put a round in a chamber?
Do you already have a round the chamber?
Whatever your steps are, I don't carry a gun with a safety.
I carry a round in my chamber.
So when I pull that gun out, I'm going to put you on the escalator to Jesus and sing you on up and let Jesus sort it out.
So you need to practice your plan, have an emergency, outline of what's going to happen.
If I'm at the home, at home and I'm out or I'm out shopping somewhere and my family's with me, we have a code word that we use, a word that we can just say in a sentence to say, hey, there's an emergency going on.
We need to get out of here to get the family.
Let's go because it's about protecting me.
It's about protecting my family.
And we need to focus on that.
So get that code word, have a plan in place, whether you're out and about going about the day.
It could be a mass shooter.
It could be anything that's going on.
You need to be prepared for your family.
You know, here we are in Austin and we're going to have the, I guarantee you, we're going to have this snow apocalypse that's going to pop up.
You know, everything's going to shut down.
People are not thinking about water.
They're not thinking about electricity, whether they have a generator.
They're not thinking about food right now.
It's going to be three or four days.
You need to plan for any type of emergency.
Something is going on in the United States right now.
I said it once.
I said it again.
When the president of the United States and the Secretary of War gets together, pulls all the general officers from around the world into one room to discuss fat soldiers.
That's not what they're talking about.
They're talking about something else.
So you better get your family in check and get them ready.
Have a plan of what you're going to do.
Do you have guns?
Do you have ammunition?
Do you have food?
Do you have water?
Do the dogs, your pets have food?
That is important.
You need to have a plan of what you're going to do because if you do not, you're going to get caught by the wayside.
I'm glad you asked that question because you know that my case, the Cargill case, which is the bump stock case that went all the way to the United States Supreme Court, that case actually made it easier for FRTs to be illegal in the country.
So thanks to the bump stock case, we actually totally killed the ATF and they weren't able to ban the brace anymore.
They're not able to ban FRTs, the force reset triggers anymore.
So because of the Cargill bump stock case, it totally just weakened the ATF.
So now they have to go through Congress.
And we know Congress is not going to get anything done because they can't even vote on a Speaker of the House, effectively.
You know, basically, you know, with criminals having like the switch, which is like illegal, fully automatic, I think FRTs are important just because then you can legally have something that's very similar to full auto to protect yourself.
And, you know, like you said, in any bad situation for prepping, you know, so you'd recommend buying an FRT for prepping?
Recording you having several 30-round magazines and thousands of rounds of ammunition and make sure everyone in the household is prepared and they're trained.
It used to be like you'd have to spend $30,000 to get some 1980s full auto, but now you can for $200 buy an FRT and drop it into your AR-15 and have something that's basically the same, which I think is great, you know, that we have that type of freedom.
But I was wondering, Harrison, regarding Trump, if you saw, I've called in before and mentioned that he's our lunar eclipse president and his astrological sign then is like a chaos and order type thing and his power time period is during full moons.
He did the Iran strike also during new moon, you know, and it's just they say like people who have that as their star sign astrological symbol that during a moon event, lunar eclipses, full moons, new moons, whatever, they have like more likelihood of their actions being successful.
I was just wondering, you know, how long it's going to be before that's what we're dealing with here because, you know, 90% of the people out there aren't listening to what's going on in Australia and New Zealand.
I have one of my best friends in the UK.
And now I'm afraid to text them certain things because for obvious reasons, I don't want to get in trouble.
And I am in California, and my wife reminded me while, you know, in the last hour that I'll bring up things on a local basis.
And it was maybe like, I hate to say this, but it was like 14, 15 years ago where Glenn Beck made a few comments about be very careful to think about your school districts and your and your county supervisors and stuff like that.
And my wife says things like, well, how come we don't even hear about the elections going up?
And all of a sudden, it's like it's come to fruition.
Every single time there's a, I put up a post about illegal, you know, taco stands in my town.
And you'd think that the fury of God must come over.
You know, and, you know, I noticed that people would come out and say things.
And I made a comment about, well, I make these comments because I want other people to come from their corner.
And there's people that are conservative, but they're scared.
Are they scared?
I can't make that thing.
But at some point, at some point, it's ridiculous because I've gone out of my way to say, hey, this is an, I guess I made a few comments to social media, the social media companies.
I've gotten kicked off of every polite you are or how much you couch your objection in language like, no, look, I don't hate anybody, but we should do this.
No, you're exactly right.
I get what you're saying, that it's the people that you're surrounded by right now that would be happy to usher in free speech laws like Australia or anti-free speech laws like Australia is implementing right now.
What's your take on that, Michael?
I mean, the First and Second Amendment, these are two P's in a pod, right?
And your life, you know, those are the elections that actually impact your neighborhood and your quality of life.
Now, what about people being afraid to speak up?
Because I think it's beyond people being afraid to speak up.
I keep finding that people are afraid to even be introduced to these ideas.
There are some people where I'm like, I would talk to them about politics, but I just know they're going to freeze up and like get scared the moment we talk about something that could even be potentially contentious.
But yeah, I think it really is fear that's keeping, if you go to the root of it, it's fear that's causing all these other problems.
It's people just being absolutely afraid to speak up and say what's wrong when they absolutely know what's wrong.
Everybody knows.
Everybody knows.
Everybody's just afraid to say it.
Let's go to clip line seven here.
Matthew in Texas is a former Air Force veteran.
Go ahead, Matthew.
You're on the air.
unidentified
Hello.
Harrison.
Hey, I just wanted to let all the veterans out there know that, you know, I did some time in the United States Air Force as a flying crew chief.
And, you know, back when the Biden administration was in office and we pulled out of Afghanistan, I'm almost positive that they were bringing Muslims into the country from Afghanistan completely unvetted.
So I just wanted to talk about the corruption that's going on in the state.
I've grown up in the Twin Cities my entire life.
Went to public schools in St. Paul.
St. Paul is quite different from Minneapolis.
We're very similar, but as far as the politics are concerned, we're a lot different.
The corruption of the state has been going on for a long time, you guys.
I first saw it when I was a kid.
Teenager going to school, and all these transportation companies started popping up that were Somalian.
And you'd see them everywhere.
And it didn't make sense, just like the daycare centers.
And millions of dollars seem to be allocated towards popping up all of these transportation companies.
And it was really weird.
Then all of a sudden, the daycare fraud came out, and there's not enough coverage on the Feeding Our Future.
And now there's all this daycare center stuff coming out.
Just read that the feds are probing into hundreds of millions of dollars of cash that was leaving Minneapolis International Airport that was in Somalian luggage that was going out of state.
Half of the federal funds for Minnesota ran or for federal programs ran in Minnesota may have been defrauded.
It's been endless.
Illian OR, one of her aides, pled guilty.
It's been absolutely endless, and I've seen it go on literally since I was about 12, 13 years old.
Well, my sister is a human resource commissioner for Pierce County, and she's no longer in that position.
But in 2024, she uncovered some corruption within the Pierce County government there where monies were allocated for government programs.
But when she went to resource the money, it wasn't there.
And she told me it was a lot of money.
And so what this call is about is I'm really looking for help.
Guys that are on the ground out there investigating.
You can go to Craig 184-860 on X.
And anybody that's on the ground, I know we can get all the information that's needed for someone to go in there and actually put the county council on, You know so.
Yeah, this is right here in Washington state and uh, you know, once uh you know she talked about this a little bit with me in 2025, but it wasn't until the Minnesota, uh fraud came out that I put two and two together and I says, wait a minute here uh, this is a little bigger than just Minnesota.
And we were talking about this yesterday with Rex Jones about how sort of the worse Israel behaves, the more people get mad at it, the more they get mad at it, the more anti-Semitism there is, the more anti-Semitism there is, the more that places like the ADL can accrue power or donations or anything else.
So it's a pretty sick feedback loop.
And I don't care what your excuse is.
Hands off the First Amendment, hands off the Second Amendment.
I don't, it really doesn't matter whether you predicate it on anti-Semitism or child sex abuse material.
It's like most of the things that they're putting forward right now are frankly illegitimate and wouldn't solve the problem that they're predicated on in the first place.
But obviously, we are seeing this happen in a worldwide fashion.
What do you think the biggest threat to our constitutional rights are at this moment?
And one of the things they'll do is they'll, like in Australia, they'll do gun control, but then they'll carve out certain groups that get gun control when others don't.
That's not how this works, actually.
No, at least not in America.
We all have a right to speak.
We all have a right to own guns.
God bless the founding fathers for writing that stuff down and codifying it in the Bill of Rights because you can see just how quickly it can all be stripped away in these other countries.
Ladies and gentlemen, Dr. Judy Mikovitz, without me even knowing she'd gotten it and used it, came on years ago and said this was the best spike protein detoxer she'd found.