Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
InfoWars. | |
| Tomorrow's news today. | ||
| Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Tuesday afternoon. | ||
| Big day, big day today. | ||
| With the vote on the Epstein files, as well as a number of speeches from Marjorie Taylor Greene and Thomas Massey, and Trump is making statements. | ||
| We got a lot to show you today, a lot to get into. | ||
| We'll be joined in the second hour by Elijah Schaefer, who not only is being sued by the FBI director's girlfriend, but is also now apparently a domestic terrorist and had a bit of trouble getting back into his home country because tyranny grows amongst us. | ||
| So we'll talk to him about that and take your calls in the final hour. | ||
| But let's begin today, as we do every day, with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| Here it is, folks, your Daily Dispatch for Tuesday, the 18th of November, 2025. | ||
| House unites to demand that Justice Department release Jeffrey Epstein files. | ||
| Representative Rokana and Thomas Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene really led the charge on this. | ||
| The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to force the Department of Justice to release files related to Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| It was the product of a months-long pressure campaign by Democrats and the Bill's leaders, Massey and Rokana. | ||
| Several of Epstein's survivors were present in the House chamber during the vote as well and appeared to erupt in cheers when the resolution was passed. | ||
| We'll again show you videos from this and talk about what it entails and how the DOJ will continue to try to undercut the release by claiming national security because the CIA was involved up to their ears. | ||
| But massive, huge success by Thomas Massey. | ||
| The entire Congress voted in favor of this except for one person, Representative Clay Higgins, which has a lot of people asking, what's wrong with Representative Clay Higgins? | ||
| And we'll try to answer that question a little bit later. | ||
| Meanwhile, massive internet outages sprung up across the world earlier today. | ||
| Cloudflare says that that hour-long, hours-long global outage that knocked off several major websites earlier Tuesday was caused by a configuration file that unexpectedly got too big. | ||
| For four hours, ChatGPT, X, Spotify, and multiple online services and websites, including Axios, this article is from Axios, were dark on Tuesday due to an outage at Cloudflare. | ||
| The outage was caused by a configuration file that is automatically generated to manage threat traffic. | ||
| The file grew beyond the expected size of entries and triggered a crash in the software system that handles traffic for a number of Cloudflare's services, which is a little bit disturbing. | ||
| It's a little bit disturbing knowing that one inappropriately programmed file could wipe out the internet for like half of the world, but certainly that's never going to be a threat in the future. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump says airstrikes on drug cartel in Colombia and Mexico are, quote, okay with me. | ||
| On Monday, President Trump told reporters in the White House that striking drug cartel targets in Colombia and Mexico would be okay with him. | ||
| Would I launch strikes on Mexico to stop drugs? | ||
| That's okay with me. | ||
| Would I do that on the land corridors? | ||
| I would, Trump said. | ||
| He expressed rare openness to direct Pentagon activities inside America's neighbor to the immediate south at a moment when ongoing deadly drone strikes on alleged drug boats off the coast of Venezuela. | ||
| This is sure to turn U.S.-Mexico relationships in a more negative direction, but Trump doesn't seem overly concerned with this as he ramps up pressure also on Colombia. | ||
| Well, when they have been the source of just infinite problems for us, I don't think I feel too sorry for Mexico either. | ||
| And I would at least be more in favor of bombing Mexican drug cartels than, you know, Palestinian children. | ||
| So I guess I'm okay with this too. | ||
| An actual threat to America from a country that is to our immediate south and causes us endless trouble by funneling millions upon millions of people and billions of dollars of drugs across our border. | ||
| We should probably deal with that. | ||
| Meanwhile, DHS arrests over 130 illegal immigrants in the first two days of Operation Charlotte's Web. | ||
| This is in Charlotte, North Carolina. | ||
| And we'll return to this on the other side. | ||
| It'll be our first major story because we're seeing some very, very, very disturbing developments there. | ||
| It's not Chicago or LA, but the reaction has been just as vociferous. | ||
| And that's because a sixth of the city is foreign-born. | ||
| So that's what happens when you replace your population. | ||
| Finally, federal appeals court will hear arguments in Texas and Louisiana's Ten Commandments case in January. | ||
| That's the wrong headline. | ||
| This is about a redistricting rule. | ||
| That's weird. | ||
| It printed the wrong headline for the story. | ||
| No, a judge has said we cannot use the redistrict map and we have to use the old rigged racist one. | ||
| Thanks, Judge. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back, folks. | |
| I said that we would continue the program with the discussion of what's happening in Charlotte, North Carolina. | ||
| I think maybe people tuning in want to know what is the latest with Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| So we might save what's going on in Charlotte here for just a second, but we do need to get to that, and it involves open sedition by a number of military officers in our government. | ||
| It's a very big deal. | ||
| But let's talk about what's happening with the Epstein file. | ||
| So the House has voted to release the files, overwhelmingly so. | ||
| All but one House lawmaker present in the chamber voted in favor of the bill to release the Epstein files. | ||
| It passed 427 to 1. | ||
| The lone no vote was Representative Clay Higgins of Louisiana, who posted on X shortly thereafter to explain his decision. | ||
| Now we'll go to his explanation here in just a second, but probably wasn't the greatest move. | ||
| Probably wasn't the greatest protest vote. | ||
| Obviously, it wasn't going to affect the outcome when everybody else is voting in favor of this. | ||
| Question is: why would he do that? | ||
| Why would he go out of his way to be the one dissenting voice on this? | ||
| And I genuinely don't know, but we'll try to figure that out. | ||
| As written, the bill reveals and injures thousands of innocent people, witnesses, people who provided alibis, family members, etc., if enacted in its current form. | ||
| This type of broad reveal of criminal investigative files released to Arab and media will absolutely result in innocent people being hurt, not by my vote, Higgins wrote. | ||
| Which again is just a little bit absurd when you have the victims of Jeffrey Epstein there in Congress cheering when this passes. | ||
| It really doesn't make any sense. | ||
| The Oversight Committee is conducting a thorough investigation that has already released well over 60,000 pages of documents from the Epstein case. | ||
| That effort will continue in a manner that provides all due protections for innocent Americans. | ||
| If the Senate amends the bill to properly address privacy of the victims and other Americans who are named but not criminally implicated, then I will vote for that bill when it comes back to the House. | ||
| So basically, Thomas Massey almost single-handedly managed to achieve this, and it is an achievement, getting both sides of the House to vote overwhelmingly in favor of something. | ||
| That is a very rare occurrence. | ||
| In fact, it usually only occurs when it comes to something like providing weapons to Israel. | ||
| This is kind of the opposite of that, which is interesting because now you've got the entire Congress voting to expose the misdeeds of an Israeli spy. | ||
| But it's a total accomplishment by Thomas Massey. | ||
| He's now warning against the Senate changing the bill substantially and basically rendering this entire process moot because they delete all of the names of all of the perpetrators, the people doing this. | ||
| But, you know, there's also a Trump card to play. | ||
| There's also the card to play of the survivors know the names. | ||
| The list, as it were, is not a single list. | ||
| There are files. | ||
| There is evidence. | ||
| There is any number of collections of data on all of this, but the survivors there know the names of the people. | ||
| I mean, they're famous people. | ||
| They're rich people. | ||
| They're people they were intimate with. | ||
| They know who these people are and could release it at any point. | ||
| They want the legal process to take place and for the official investigative files to be released, but they don't need to. | ||
| And so Marjorie Taylor Greene is talking about that basically as a fail-safe, dead man switch sort of thing. | ||
| We'll go to a couple videos of this. | ||
| Let's go first to clip number four. | ||
| This is Representative Massey on, yeah, clip four. | ||
| Although, I don't know, is this mislabeled Representative Massey on Epstein? | ||
| Let's go to clip four now. | ||
| No, it's Marjorie Taylor Green. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| That's what I thought. | ||
| Let's go to clip four. | ||
| Finally, putting these victims and these survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and the cabal of rich, powerful elites that expands not just here in the United States of America, but to other countries as well. | ||
| We're putting them last. | ||
| And that is exactly what Americans want. | ||
| You see, for far too long, far too long, Americans have been put last. | ||
| And they're sick of it. | ||
| They're sick and tired of it. | ||
| And this is why they don't trust Congress. | ||
| This is why they don't trust the government. | ||
| And here's the problem. | ||
| All of these women, women who have suffered in shame for years and years and years, women who were terrified, women who were intimidated, women who were threatened, just like Virginia Guffray. | ||
| And now she's dead. | ||
| And these women should have never faced that for this information to come out. | ||
| And we, especially the four Republican members of the House of Representatives, we should have never faced intimidation and threats for us to get this vote to come to the floor. | ||
| Never forget there were four: Thomas Massey, myself, Nancy Mace, and Lauren Bobert. | ||
| We had to sign a discharge petition, and we had to fight through intimidation, and we had to endure it for months to push that discharge petition finally to 218 to get this vote to come out. | ||
| This is what the American people are sick of, and rightfully so. | ||
| Now, where does this go from? | ||
| Well, I'll tell you where it goes from here. | ||
| The bill has been passed. | ||
| It'll go to the Senate now. | ||
| Let's go to clip number. | ||
| We'll watch the actual passing of the bill. | ||
| Clip number 10 here. | ||
| This is the U.S. House passing this legislation, forcing the DOJ to release the information of the Jeffrey Epstein files. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
On this vote, the yays are 427. | |
| The nays are one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Two-thirds being in the affirmative, the rules are suspended. | |
| The bill is passed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And without objection, the motion to reconsider is laid on the table. | |
| There you go, and the cheering goes up. | ||
| Again, this battle isn't over, not by a long shot. | ||
| And, you know, there's a good reason why it's been so difficult to get the Jeffrey Epstein files out. | ||
| It's a pretty obvious reason. | ||
| Of course, the claim that they're making is still valid technically, and that's a claim of national security. | ||
| From kenclippenstein.com. | ||
| National security blocks Epstein file release. | ||
| While Congress votes on a bill many think will pry loose the Jeffrey Epstein files, one glaring loophole will prevent full transparency. | ||
| It's called national security. | ||
| Not national security that has anything to do with the national defense or harm to the nation, but the self-serving kind that protects the system from the people by depriving them of information. | ||
| In this case, about Jeffrey Epstein, his 1,000-plus victims, according to the government, and any accomplices he had. | ||
| With 89% of Americans in agreement that the Justice Department should release all information about Jeffrey Epstein, the message is clear: national security is more important than democracy. | ||
| Take a look at Congress's long-shot attempt to force the release of the government's records. | ||
| A seemingly innocuous word appears in the resolution, unclassified. | ||
| It's an official word that, in theory, only exists when it comes to national security matters. | ||
| That is, that the release of such information could cause harm to national security. | ||
| There is, of course, a small chance that some FBI method relating to intelligence collection might officially qualify as classified because the release might expose certain capabilities of the government. | ||
| But even there, I'd argue the public has a right to know, and yet somehow the word made its way into the Epstein Files Transparency Act. | ||
| It's the wrong word. | ||
| The bill, after demanding that, quote, no record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary, goes on to undermine all of this. | ||
| The bill says that the Attorney General, quote, makes a determination that covered information may not be declassified and made available in a manner that protects national security of the United States, including methods or sources related to national security. | ||
| The Attorney General shall release an unclassified summary for each of the redacted or withheld classified information, as in the Attorney General will get to decide what to release and how to characterize it. | ||
| So, again, it's a very convenient watchword about supposed national security, which actually might and would contain the fact that, well, our international allies and geopolitical others might, I don't know, attack us if we release it, right? | ||
| It's actually just an extension of the blackmail operation that's going on. | ||
| Now, Mike Johnson has basically doubled down on this and is saying that, yeah, we're not going to be able to release it without substantial redactions. | ||
| Let's go to clip number six here. | ||
| This is leader of the Senate, Mike Johnson. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Number five, national security concerns, okay? | ||
| The discharge requires the Attorney General to release within 30 days, quote, classified information to the maximum extent possible. | ||
| This ignores the principle that declassification should always rest and always has rested with the agency that originated the intelligence. | ||
| Why? | ||
| So that they can protect their critical sources and methods. | ||
| It is incredibly dangerous to demand that officials or employees of the DOJ declassify materials that originated in other agencies and intelligence agencies. | ||
| And of course, the absurdity of all of this is that President Trump came out yesterday. | ||
| And basically, again, I think you can look at a lot of what Trump does as face-saving. | ||
| Like a lot of what he does is all about saving face. | ||
| And in this case, the vote was going to go against him, and they knew it was going to go against him. | ||
| And you see now it went completely against him, with everybody except for Clay Higgins, you know, voting to release the files, files that Trump has spent the last 10 months claiming don't exist, claiming they're already released, claiming it's a hoax. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| So he could have released it at any point with a wave of a stroke of a pen, right? | ||
| Wave of a hand. | ||
| He has the power to declassify. | ||
| He could have released this at any point. | ||
| He didn't because he didn't want it released. | ||
| Then when the vote looked like it was going to go against him, he came out yesterday and said, actually, I want you to release it. | ||
| I'm telling you to release everything. | ||
| And I'm instructing Pam Bondi, the DOJ, you know, release everything. | ||
| And that was because he knew this vote was going against him. | ||
| So he sort of wanted to, it would look really bad if he said, don't vote for this. | ||
| And every single person in the Congress voted for it. | ||
| That would not be a face-saving exercise. | ||
| That would be a face-destroying exercise. | ||
| So to save face, he's acting like he's in favor of this while simultaneously instructing the DOJ to reopen investigations into this, which is the other way that they'll keep information hidden. | ||
| It's either national security implications, in which case they don't even have to tell you why they're blocking what they're blocking because national security after all, or because there's an open investigation. | ||
| And you can't release the information of an investigation until the investigation is completed. | ||
| So there are mechanisms behind the scene that will prevent this stuff from being released anyway. | ||
| As Thomas Massey notes, this is how Speaker Johnson plans to protect the perverts who went to Rape Island from embarrassment. | ||
| Do not let the Senate add an amendment to avoid disclosing these rich and powerful men who have evaded justice for so many years. | ||
| Is Johnson calling all victims, quote, non-credible? | ||
| And this was a note of the dangers of the discharge position, if not amended. | ||
| Victim privacy, they say, it doesn't adequately protect victims. | ||
| But importantly, part two, innocent persons risks disclosure of non-credible allegations creating new victims. | ||
| Which, in other words, because they didn't charge these guys, they therefore are legally innocent and can't have their names released. | ||
| But that's only because the government chose not to try to prosecute them, chose to allow them to get away with it. | ||
| So they never got convicted. | ||
| So now they get to continue to cover up their participation. | ||
| It's pretty perverted stuff, if you ask me. | ||
| Now, in a way, this is all a giant hoax. | ||
| I mean, the Democrats pretending to care about this is a hoax. | ||
| It's absolutely fraudulent. | ||
| They had four years where they controlled the House and the Senate. | ||
| They never even mentioned Epstein. | ||
| Just keep reminding you over and over. | ||
| They downplayed Epstein every chance they got for 10 years until they decided it would hurt Trump. | ||
| And now they're acting like they care about this. | ||
| Just about every article you could find about Jeffrey Epstein from a leftist organization between 2016 and 2025, every single outlet conflates Jeffrey Epstein with like crazy QAnon conspiracy theories about Hillary Clinton having a buffet of baby body parts in a basement in wherever, Martha's Vineyard. | ||
| You know, it's like they constantly, constantly demonized and mocked the idea that there were elite pedophile rings. | ||
| So the idea that they now care and are fighting this good fight for these victims, it is just, it's an insult to your intelligence and it's a giant hoax. | ||
| And that is true. | ||
| But it did actually happen and the Democrats were involved. | ||
| Let's go to Jim Jordan here, clip number seven, where he talks about the charade that this Epstein debacle represents. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I give myself such time as I may consume. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The gentleman is recognized. | |
| We all support holding bad guys accountable, and we're all going to vote for this resolution. | ||
| But I think a little perspective is important. | ||
| Democrats have had spent six months talking about Epstein, even though they had four years to do something about it. | ||
| Now, why would they do that? | ||
| Why would they do that? | ||
| Maybe it's to go after President Trump. | ||
| Never forget they shut down the government for 43 days. | ||
| They said, don't worry about our military. | ||
| Don't worry about air traffic controllers. | ||
| Don't worry about our economy. | ||
| Don't worry about American families. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| Close the government for a month and a half because it might hurt the president. | ||
| For the past decade, there's been one constant for Democrats. | ||
| One constant. | ||
| Go after Trump. | ||
| They spied on his campaign. | ||
| Then it was Mueller. | ||
| Then it was impeachment one. | ||
| Then it was impeachment two. | ||
| Then it was all the law affair. | ||
| Alvin Bragg, Fonnie Willis, Letitia James. | ||
| Then it was Ardig Frost investigation at the Justice Department surveilling United States senators and congressmen and a whole hust of other Americans. | ||
| Then it was Jack Smith and his gag orders and his raiding President Trump's home. | ||
| Then it was a 43-day shutdown and now it's Epstein. | ||
| And by the way, by the way, the same party that did all that, they were also the ones who were texting with Mr. Epstein during a hearing where Michael Cohen was their witness in another effort to go after the president. | ||
| That's pretty funny. | ||
| It's almost like the efforts to go after President Trump are like collapsing in on top of each other. | ||
| So that was Jim Jordan. | ||
| He goes off for several more minutes, but you got a little taste there. | ||
| And he's exactly right. | ||
| And I mean, the Democrats are so goofy, like they're so stupid. | ||
| And just everything they say is fake. | ||
| I really, I wish it wasn't like this. | ||
| I really do wish I could go, oh, this whole divide, this right-left divide is a Sharad. | ||
| It's all a mirage. | ||
| Really, it's two sides of the same coin. | ||
| But no, I'm sorry. | ||
| The Democrats are retarded, okay, in a way that Republicans aren't. | ||
| Republicans are retarded in their own special way. | ||
| Don't get me wrong. | ||
| But there's something about Democrats being so just endlessly dishonest, like really to a degree that it's like, it's not even possible to believe you mean what you're saying. | ||
| It's not even possible. | ||
| So as Jim Jordan lays out there, they spent literally four years trying to go after Donald Trump with everything they had. | ||
| They never once considered that Epstein would be a method to go after him, or they would have employed it. | ||
| While they were going after him, they're having, you know, they're questioning Michael Cohen, who was the traitor, the backstabber, who was behind a lot of the Trump investigations and attempts to throw him in prison. | ||
| Michael Cohen lied and misrepresented his participation in the Trump campaign. | ||
| And so while they're interviewing him to try to destroy Donald Trump, they're asking questions that are being fed to them by Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| So again, the whole idea that the Democrats care at all about Epstein or his activities or relating him to Trump, it is all absurd. | ||
| And it reached maybe a peak of absurdity when Chuck Schumer was asked why the Senate didn't go after Trump for four years. | ||
| And he seems like doesn't even understand the question. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Senator, on that note, just, I guess, a question that's out there. | ||
| Why wouldn't they have been released the last four years when President Biden was in office? | ||
| Well, that's the question every American is asking. | ||
| Or not every American, but so many Americans are asking. | ||
| What the hell is he hiding? | ||
| Why doesn't he want them released? | ||
| When you don't want something like this released, when even a whole lot of Republicans are calling for the release, his own party members, people ask the question, what's he hiding? | ||
| It's got to be answered by releasing the files. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| No, Chuck, I think you misunderstood the question. | ||
| Why didn't you try to release these if it was so important? | ||
| If you're so genuinely motivated to get justice for these women, why didn't you release it during the Biden administration where there were no barriers to you doing so? | ||
| It's almost like a Monty Python skid or something. | ||
| It's just like, why didn't you release it? | ||
| And he's like, I know. | ||
| That's what I'm asking. | ||
| No, why didn't you, no, you could have released it and you didn't? | ||
| He's like, I know exactly. | ||
| So what is Trump hiding? | ||
| Like, this is hilarious, frankly. | ||
| Frankly, it's hilarious that these people are capable of wielding immense power over all of us. | ||
| And by hilarious, of course, I mean terrifying and upsetting. | ||
| Let's go to clip number two here, Mike Binns on the real reason why the Epstein files have been so difficult to release when either party is in office. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| When you look at, for example, the close relationship between Jeffrey Epstein, the Clinton family, and the Ahud Barak Israeli Labor Party, it is patently clear that if the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department were to do a sweep of all of their files, communications, records, a simple name trace of Jeffrey Epstein's name, the voluminous scale of the documentation, I think, would be enormous. | ||
| The State Department rented out a physical property to Jeffrey Epstein personally in the 1990s. | ||
| You and I can't just get the State Department as our personal landlord after seizing a mansion from the government of Iran, to say nothing of Epstein's work during Iran-Contra with both the U.S. and Israeli side of intelligence through the Adnan Khashoggi link or through what was being done in the 1990s between Bill Clinton and Ahud Barak when he was the prime minister there. | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein setting up the Clinton Global Initiative, and she goes on to be Secretary of State. | ||
| For some reason, they are not pursuing this lead, and it is maddening to watch from the outside. | ||
| It's funny because he was another topic of conversation in the White House today. | ||
| In fact, let's go to clip number three here. | ||
| This is Trump on Epstein when he was questioned about this in the Oval Office today. | ||
| Clip number three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As far as the Epstein files is, I have nothing to do with Jeffrey Epstein. | |
| I threw him out of my club many years ago because I thought he was a sick pervert. | ||
| But I guess I would turn out to be right. | ||
| But you know who does have? | ||
| Bill Clinton, Larry Summers, who ran Harvard, was with him every single night, every single weekend. | ||
| They lived together. | ||
| They went to his island many times. | ||
| I never did. | ||
| Andrew Weissman, I hear. | ||
| All these guys were friends of his. | ||
| You don't even talk about those people. | ||
| And he, of course, is exactly right. | ||
| And after all of this, remember, there's always the Trump card. | ||
| There's always the dead man switch. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 29. | ||
| Here's Marjorie Taylor Greene laying that out. | ||
| People are sick of, and rightfully so. | ||
| Now, where does this go from here? | ||
| The question will remain. | ||
| Will the Department of Justice release all the information? | ||
| Will a judge in New York release the information? | ||
| Will the CIA release the information? | ||
| And will foreign governments release their information? | ||
| Or will this continue after this vote today be a cover-up? | ||
| A cover-up of the rich, powerful elites that bond together in sex and human trafficking abuse and all types of global business that enriches them but never serves Americans. | ||
| The American people will know and the victims, actually the survivors of Jeffrey Epstein will know because they know the list of names. | ||
| And I remain dedicated to my promise to read that names, those names here on the House floor, if those women ever find them in a place that it needs to be done. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I yield back to Mr. Lady from Georgia yields back, gentlemen. | |
| There you go. | ||
| Reserves. | ||
| That's the real threat. | ||
| So, you know, long story short, this was an intelligence agency honeypot combination between Israel and America. | ||
| And exposing that would blow the whole thing up. | ||
| We're going to move on, but I actually want to show a little bit of a longer clip from Thomas Massey. | ||
| He was asked about the Epstein vote and what it means and where it goes from here. | ||
| But he's also asked about Donald Trump and his recent lashing out at Marjorie Taylor Greene and Massey himself. | ||
| And I think today represents sort of a watershed moment in Trump's political career. | ||
| There was a while where the Trump curse was very real, and it could kind of be anybody. | ||
| You go against Trump and your life was over, basically. | ||
| Michael Cohen is a great example of that. | ||
| People who betray Trump or just go against him in any way just would always find that they were stumbling and falling and not doing so well. | ||
| And what's happened here is that I don't think Thomas Massey started this fight. | ||
| I never saw Thomas Massey as an anti-Trump person. | ||
| There were things that Trump would do that Thomas Massey would stand up against on principle, same way that Rand Paul would or Marjorie Taylor Greene or anybody else. | ||
| So it caused friction. | ||
| And even during his first administration, Thomas Massey was there sort of gumming up the works. | ||
| But he was never an anti-Trump guy. | ||
| And as far as I could tell, it wasn't him that started the beef. | ||
| But Donald Trump decided to, you know, aim all his cannons at Massey and, you know, give him the full broadside. | ||
| And as now the smoke is cleared, Thomas Massey is doing a lot better because of it. | ||
| Seems like he has raised his profile quite a bit, achieved this really very impressive legislative achievement, getting both houses to vote in favor of this bill, even under opposition from Trump. | ||
| So I want to give him his credit and also hear what he has to say about Trump. | ||
| And even just the way that he's talking here, you can tell that he has the initiative. | ||
| He has the momentum behind him. | ||
| And, you know, he's being asked about Trump attacking him, but not in a way of like, oh, now you're in trouble, son. | ||
| What are you going to do about it? | ||
| But more of like, yeah, that didn't seem to work, did it? | ||
| Why do you think he did that? | ||
| So I think the era of the Trump curse is over. | ||
| And there's lots of reasons why, but this represents a sea change and a waning of the MAGA power structure in favor of people that seem even more sincerely dedicated to American interests, even at the expense of Israeli ones. | ||
| And again, that is the crux of this entire series of scandals, events, whatever you want to call it. | ||
| So I'm going to go to Thomas Massey now, clip number 23, where he just lays out everything, lays out everything about this and answers questions about the future of MAGA and Trump's seemingly lashing out at Massey and Marjorie Taylor Greene and other true America First Patriots. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Well, he got tired of me winning, so he joined our side. | ||
| I have no animosity toward him. | ||
| I regret that it got personal for some folks, but it never has for me. | ||
| It's always been about the survivors. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| I mean, man, Trump wants a fighting troop. | ||
| Well, the Speaker, the Attorney General, the FBI Director, the President, and the Vice President could have saved us all this time and embarrassment, frankly, for our own party if they'd just done the right thing four months ago. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you believe him, Congressman? | |
| I mean, for weeks he's been pushing against this. | ||
| Now he says he supports it. | ||
| Do buy it. | ||
| He's only supporting it because President told him to support it. | ||
| That's what Mike Johnson does. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I'm talking about do-buy President Trump saying that he wants the House to pass this resistance. | |
| Well, I'm concerned that now he's opening a flurry of investigations. | ||
| And I believe they may be trying to use those investigations as a predicate for not releasing the files. | ||
| That's my concern. | ||
| Well, they will, I'm afraid they're going to try to use a provision of the law that allows you not to release these materials if they're subject of an ongoing investigation and would harm, and the release of which would harm the ongoing investigation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, what do you think this is all about for President Trump? | |
| First, he was blocking this, pushing Republicans to block this for so long. | ||
| Now he's reversing course, and he has the power to release the whole files anyway. | ||
| Well, it's pretty simple. | ||
| For four months, he thought the best thing for him was to keep the files secret, and somebody convinced him that the best thing for him was to release the files. | ||
| And if they're serious about it, they should release them right now. | ||
| It's that simple. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why do you think he is working so hard not to get them released for so many months? | |
| What do you think the real reason is? | ||
| These files implicate billionaires and friends of him, of his, and political donors that he's trying to protect. | ||
| And Epstein also had close ties to our own intelligence agencies and Israel's intelligence agencies. | ||
| That's why there's so much effort in trying to stop this. | ||
| And I do believe they'll try to stop it somewhere else. | ||
| And that's going to backfire on them, too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So the president's saying he'll sign it. | |
| You don't buy that? | ||
| No, I think he'll sign it. | ||
| I want to be there at the signing party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You think he'll be invited? | |
| I've never seen somebody not get invited to sign their own bill. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But what about just a personal nature of this? | |
| I mean, again, he goes after you, your wife, caused Marjorie Taylor Queen a trainer. | ||
| Let's be clear. | ||
| He went after my late wife and my current wife. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you think about that? | |
| I think it's a new low for him. | ||
| But again, we laughed it off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's more to his detriment than mine that he put something like that out. | |
| But I think it was beyond the pale. | ||
| And if that's what it took for him to go that far, to realize he needs to support this instead of opposing it, then that's okay. | ||
| By the way, my wife has laughed about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She did tell me to invite Trump to the wedding, and I didn't, so she blames me for him getting mad. | |
| Are you optimistic this will pass tomorrow? | ||
| Yeah, I think it's going to pass. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's going to pass with a veto-approved majority. | |
| Do you think the speaker will support it? | ||
| I think begrudgingly he has to at this point. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Congressman, you obviously had your differences with President Trump in the past, but Congressman Green was one of his closest allies, one of his strongest supporters. | |
| What do you make of the fact that over the Epstein files have prompted this such a public and serious breakup? | ||
| Well, Marjorie represents the base. | ||
| I mean, she represents what we campaigned on, more so than me, even the populist movement that brought Trump into the White House. | ||
| And when he told his supporters that they're no longer his supporters, if they still want the Epstein files released, he lost a lot of supporters. | ||
| But Marjorie didn't. | ||
| And she's in favor of finding justice for the survivors. | ||
| And so she won the argument. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think that President Trump has lost his touch on the MAGA base, lost his understanding of the MAGA base? | |
| I think on aspects of fiscal responsibility, on aspects of starting wars overseas and getting into regime change, and on this case of releasing the Epstein files, I think he has strayed away from the things that he campaigned on. | ||
| I think he has strayed away from the things that he campaigned on. | ||
| I completely agree with that. | ||
| I really agree with everything Thomas Massey just said right there. | ||
| Yeah, Trump lost the argument here. | ||
| And it's sort of been forced to reverse, but they're still launching these new investigations, as Thomas Massey noted, that will continue to try to limit the release of this stuff. | ||
| Again, it's not unlikely that this stuff is actually being used now as leverage with the Israelis. | ||
| After all, we've heard JD Vance say that they had to use leverage in order to get the peace deal with the Israelis. | ||
| It obviously would not be a good thing for Israel to have it exposed and just crystal clear, black and white, how their operatives were running honeypot operations with underage minors in order to control our political system. | ||
| And this is sort of the ultimate test of that process, right? | ||
| It's like, can the blackmail pedophile network wield enough leverage to stop the release of the information about the pedophile blackmail network? | ||
| Sort of the sort of a self-fulfilling kind of thing here. | ||
| Thomas Massey says, quote, don't muck it up, urge the Senate to pass the Epstein bill as the House vote succeeds wildly. | ||
| He urged the Senate on Tuesday to pass a bipartisan measure forcing the Justice Department to release the files. | ||
| The comments come just ahead of that House vote. | ||
| And a shock reversal and rare defeat from his oft-loyal base, the president called this week for House of Representatives to vote in favor of releasing the files, saying it's time to move on from this Democrat hoax. | ||
| Trump's switch-up undercuts months of work House Speaker Mike Johnson had done that intentionally or not delayed the discharge position from reaching the floor, discharge petition from reaching the floor. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene, who said Trump severed ties with her over her support for the Epstein vote, predicted a unanimous vote in the House during Tuesday's press conference alongside Massey, Representative Khanna, and several Epstein survivors. | ||
| Massey appealed directly to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who's been non-committal on the measure, saying, quote, it's up to him. | ||
| He needs to bring this matter to the floor of the Senate. | ||
| I think the vote today will show that. | ||
| And so again, it's just this whole situation, this whole thing has been totally unnecessary. | ||
| Trump could have at any point simply ordered these files released, and we could have avoided months of acrimony, months of backstabbing, months of senseless speculation and detrimental argumentation. | ||
| Like all of this has been pointless, and it's all been in a futile attempt to cover up for a foreign state and their method and strategies of controlling American politics. | ||
| It's frankly offensive that any of this has been allowed to go on this long. | ||
| And I'm actually very, you know, happy that the Congress has agreed to do this. | ||
| Like, it's weird, but like, I guess this is what you need. | ||
| You need to psyop the Democrats into thinking that they're hurting Trump and then they'll vote for something. | ||
| It's very silly. | ||
| Again, they could have done this at any point while Biden was president. | ||
| They never chose to do that. | ||
| And they're only doing it now because they think it'll hurt Trump when the vast majority of them are the ones that are associated with the criminals. | ||
| So, you know, it's just, they're just so dumb. | ||
| Sometimes that works out in our favor. | ||
| Sometimes it works out in our favor, just how very, very dumb they truly are. | ||
| And let's see. | ||
| I want to go to Marjorie Taylor Green now because that was also brought up from Infowars.com. | ||
| Watch Marjorie Taylor Greene fires back over Trump traitor label. | ||
| Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene responded to President Donald Trump's recent criticisms during a press conference with Epstein victims Tuesday, condemning his labeling of her a quote traitor. | ||
| Quote, I was called traitor by a man that I fought for for five, no, actually six years, and I gave him my loyalty for free. | ||
| I won my first election without his endorsement, beating eight men in a primary, and I've never owed him anything, but I fought for him for the policies and for America first, she said about her rift with Trump. | ||
| And he called me a traitor for standing with these women and refusing to take my name off the discharge position, she said, claiming during the press, the presser tied to the passing of this bill. | ||
| That's what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president, in order to make this vote happen. | ||
| I was called a traitor by a man I fought for for six years. | ||
| She added, let me tell you what a traitor is. | ||
| A traitor is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves. | ||
| A patriot is an American that serves the United States of America and Americans like the women standing behind me. | ||
| Representative Green's follow comments follow a tense tit-for-tat with the president, with Trump withdrawing support for her reelection over the weekend and devising new nicknames for her, Marjorie Trader Green and Marjorie Taylor Brown. | ||
| Yeah, it doesn't quite have the same, doesn't quite have the same oomph as crooked Hillary, but I don't know. | ||
| It's always, it's always sad. | ||
| It's like watching Mike Tyson box in 2024. | ||
| Like it was there one time. | ||
| He had the stuff at one point, but we don't know what he's doing now. | ||
| Again, it's very, it's just, it's just frustrating because we really, really, really, really, really need Trump to win and have success, but he is seemingly deliberately shooting himself in the foot every couple hours these days. | ||
| Representative Marjorie Taylor Green hits back at Trump. | ||
| Quote, I've never owed him anything. | ||
| I believe, do we have the video from this press conference? | ||
| We only have her on the floor. | ||
| Yeah, let's go to clip number five here. | ||
| We won't go to the whole thing, but this is Marjorie Taylor Greene during this press conference. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Thank you, Thomas. | ||
| Thank you, Roe. | ||
| I woke up this morning and I turned to my weather app to check the temperature and it was 32 degrees. | ||
| And my first thought was, hell has froze over. | ||
| I want to speak goodness and love and hope into the women standing behind me and all of the other survivors whose names you don't even know, but stand with these women. | ||
| They are survivors and they are strong and they are courageous and they are daughters of God. | ||
| They are not victims. | ||
| These women have fought the most horrific fight that no woman should have to fight and they did it by banding together and never giving up. | ||
| And that's what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president of the United States, in order to make this vote happen today. | ||
| I was called a traitor by a man that I fought for five, no, actually six years for. | ||
| And I gave him my loyalty for free. | ||
| I won my first election without his endorsement, beating eight men in a primary. | ||
| And I've never owed him anything, but I fought for him for the policies and for America first. | ||
| And he called me a traitor for standing with these women and refusing to take my name off the discharge petition. | ||
| Let me tell you what a traitor is. | ||
| A traitor is an American that serves foreign countries and themselves. | ||
| A patriot is an American that serves the United States of America and Americans like the women standing behind me. | ||
| And I want to tell you that this only became possible today because the American people whom we serve as representatives here in Congress demanded that this vote happen and they put more pressure on every single elected politician in this city than has ever been put on them. | ||
| And today you are going to see probably a unanimous vote in the House to release the Epstein files, but the fight, the real fight, will happen after that. | ||
| Well, I want to see every single name released so that these women don't have to live in fear and intimidation, which is something I've had a small taste of in just the past few days. | ||
| Just a small taste. | ||
| They've been living it for years. | ||
| But the real test will be: will the Department of Justice release the files? | ||
| Or will it all remain tied up in investigations? | ||
| Will the CIA release the files? | ||
| So again, what she's asking is who's really in charge here? | ||
| Who really runs our government? | ||
| Who really has a say? | ||
| Is it people that we, the American citizens, have an ability to recall if we don't like them, who actually have to, in some way, pretend to pander to us? | ||
| Or is it the unelected deep state who have the final say and are able to manipulate the processes of our elected government to achieve whatever ends they design? | ||
| That's the real question being asked here. | ||
| And I guess we await a full answer because when every single representative in the House votes in favor of something, you would think that would translate theoretically the way our government's set up. | ||
| That should mean that everyone in America, on average, wants this to happen. | ||
| So the question is, if everyone in America is represented by somebody that wants a thing to happen, are we able to make that thing happen? | ||
| If not, that's the complete condemnation of democracy as a concept, the republic as a concept. | ||
| If every single representative in the country wants the files released, if they're not released, we don't run our country anymore. | ||
| That's pretty cut and dry. | ||
| It's pretty clear. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| That's really what's being asked here. | ||
| And of course, what she's saying is not small. | ||
| It's not like she's saying that the release of these documents that show the activity of a widespread and highly connected pedophile sex trafficking ring inspired the largest outpouring of lobbying and threats and pressure that she's ever seen in Washington, D.C. | ||
| To the point where she, of course, is being doxed and swatted and attempts on her life and threats against her life are being made. | ||
| And so you got to understand this is so far beyond. | ||
| Like, I think it's smart politically to sort of frame everything as we're helping these victims, and they certainly do deserve justice on an individual level. | ||
| But this is so much bigger than just the victims and the crimes that were performed against them. | ||
| It's about the blackmail rings. | ||
| It's about the pressure campaigns. | ||
| It's about the fact that this pernicious influence has soaked into every single elite circle in this country. | ||
| And when asked about why Trump didn't want these released, Thomas Massey said, I think it's his billionaire buddies that are on the list that are going to be in trouble. | ||
| Certainly that is at least partly true. | ||
| Now, the other thing that makes this whole thing nonsensical and confusing is because the emails that have been released from the Epstein estate, to me, show pretty unequivocally that they were not fans of Trump and had nothing on Trump and weren't able to blackmail Trump. | ||
| And again, this is so, it's so weird how this is all inverted. | ||
| This is one of the emails from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Summers, Harvard, you know, kingpin, OpenAI sits on the board. | ||
| We'll get into him in a minute. | ||
| He's like a kingpin in all of this. | ||
| And again, you know, inspires a lot of questions as to how this blackmail is used. | ||
| That's the important part. | ||
| That's the important part to understand is that we have no idea. | ||
| And this might be the real thing that would be concerning people. | ||
| We have no idea where and how this blackmail pressure has been utilized. | ||
| Who has been silenced from their opposition to, you know, wars in the Middle East through the invocation of the blackmail that they've been saddled with. | ||
| Larry Summers being on the board of OpenAI. | ||
| Remember, it wasn't just politicians that Jeffrey Epstein surrounded himself by. | ||
| He was a spy who was given billions and billions of dollars from not just the Israeli government, which is really just one part of a larger group called the Mega Group. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| They gave Jeffrey Epstein billions of dollars to present himself not just as an investor and could therefore have access to all sorts of people who want money. | ||
| I mean, you know, if you are an angel investor, you can basically get a meeting with literally anybody. | ||
| But they primarily wielded that in the scientific and tech communities to take over those operations. | ||
| So I wonder in the open AI conundrum where they ousted Sam Altman, he came back and wiped the whole board and put Larry Summers at the head. | ||
| I wonder if pedophile blackmail was used to achieve that. | ||
| You have to understand how ubiquitous this network is in American elite. | ||
| So from Jeffrey Epstein to Larry Summers, he says, recall I've told you I've met some very bad people, none as bad as Trump, not one decent cell in his body. | ||
| So yes, he's dangerous. | ||
| And people say, imagine writing Jeffrey, having Jeffrey Epstein write this about you. | ||
| Imagine having Jeffrey Epstein not write this about you. | ||
| Yeah, imagine having an evil, creepy, pedophile spy not like you. | ||
| It's really weird. | ||
| They're using the fact that the elite, you know, Israeli pedophile blackmailer called Trump dangerous as like, can you imagine how bad he must be? | ||
| No, it's because he's good. | ||
| When the evil people call you bad, you're good. | ||
| Is this confusing to anybody? | ||
| Yeah, he was dangerous to them. | ||
| He's dangerous to their operations. | ||
| He's dangerous because he's not controlled. | ||
| That's what dangerous means in their world. | ||
| You know who's not dangerous? | ||
| Somebody you have on video having sex with an animal. | ||
| They're as compliant as can be, not dangerous in the slightest. | ||
| The dangerous person is Donald Trump. | ||
| So why he's the one covering for it? | ||
| It almost has to be that he is in fact using the blackmail himself to achieve his ends. | ||
| That almost has to be the case because clearly Trump is not involved in this stuff from their own internal emails. | ||
| We've seen that from the video from 2015 of Donald Trump being the one to bring up the rape island and Prince Andrew being involved in it before Epstein was even arrested the second time. | ||
| He has been on the forefront of this. | ||
| So to me, the only explanation as to why he's withheld this is because he must be using the information, but we're not seeing a ton of results from that. | ||
| We'll return to this more and I'll give you a rundown as to exactly Larry Summers is. | ||
| But we're going to welcome Elijah Schaefer in the next hour and we're going to talk about the abuse that he has suffered under by the deep state of our country who are trying to silence him because he's criticizing the FBI. | ||
| But I do want to tell you that there is a crazy deal going on at the AlexJonestore.com. | ||
| 10 bucks. | ||
| Just free by going there. | ||
| Free $10, no minimum spend. | ||
| This sale ends Monday, the 24th of November for the next week. | ||
| Add any of our amazing products to your cart and you will get free $10 applied automatically to your purchase. | ||
| No minimum, whatever you get is $10 off on us. | ||
| Try ultramethylene blue, bovine colostrum, the ultimate CMOS capsules, ultimate life force, shilajit cummies. | ||
| Plus, if you get, if you become a VIP member, you get $40 store credit. | ||
| So if you go today, become a VIP member, you're basically getting $20 off anything you want to buy right off the bat. | ||
| That's the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Keep us on the air, folks. | ||
| In the hellish theater of the 1992 to 1996 siege of Sarajevo, where Bosnian Serb forces encircled the city, the longest urban siege in the history of modern warfare, a grotesque sideshow allegedly unfolded. | ||
| Reportedly, wealthy foreigners, Italians, Americans, Russians, Canadians, allegedly shelled out 70,000 to 88,000 euros per jaunt, flying from Trieste to Belgrade, then helicoptered to sniper nests in the hills above Sarajevo. | ||
| Guided by Serbian state security operatives like the convicted war criminal Jova Kostanisvich, they took aim at unarmed women, men, and children scurrying along Sniper Alley with premium fees tacked on for the trophy of a child's kill. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Among the evidence is testimony from a former Bosnian military intelligence officer who documented earlier reports of so-called war safaris that came from a Serbian prisoner of war. | |
| Of course, there are documents about this. | ||
| I remember at least three of them. | ||
| One is the record of his interrogation. | ||
| Another is the record of the follow-up interrogation. | ||
| And the third is an analysis I prepared, which explained the phenomenon of the war safari, a term mentioned for the first time on the Sarajevo battlefield. | ||
| Bosnian authorities say they launched an investigation two years ago, but it appears to have sold. | ||
| Eyewitness accounts from the era resurfaced in Italian prosecutor Alessandro Gobi's ongoing Milan investigation, peeling back layers of complicity that reek of untouched privilege. | ||
| Former U.S. Marine John Jordan testifying at The Hague in 2007 described the deliberate targeting of the vulnerable. | ||
| Quote, if a family was walking, it would be the youngest, end quote. | ||
| Bosnian intelligence officer Eden Subisic, capturing a Serbian soldier in 1993, uncovered the operation's logistics. | ||
| Weekend rotations, spotters calling shots, victims priced like quarry at auction. | ||
| Italian military intelligence confirmed the trips in 1994 after Subisic's tip-off, halting them within months, yet no prosecutions followed until now, with journalist Ezio Gavazzini's 17-page dossier naming five Italian suspects and demanding accountability for this peak of depravity. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What we can say is that there were certainly civilians who shot at the people at the population of Sarajevo, paying for this kind of activity. | |
| U.S. Congresswoman Ana Paulina Luna has also launched a parallel probe into American involvement, vowing to drag any implicated elites into the light. | ||
| The Sarajevo abomination didn't slither from the ether. | ||
| It's a venomous thread where the powerful have long stalked the powerless for sport, their wealth, a license to dehumanize. | ||
| Throughout the 20th century, persistent rumors allege that European royalty and high aristocracy participated in clandestine human hunts on private estates, treating poachers, trespassers, or abducted locals as live quarry in macabre rituals echoing medieval traditions. | ||
| Similar claims surfaced in 1950s Bavaria, where a minor Habsburg prince was said to have hosted weekend Jagspiel on sealed forest tracks with East German refugees allegedly released at dawn for pursuit by rifle-armed guests. | ||
| Only disappearances and no prosecutions or verified bodies ever materialized. | ||
| Yet the pattern, remote land, absolute privacy, and elite impunity mirrors the Sarajevo safaris, suggesting a continuum of aristocratic blood sport shielded by wealth and silence. | ||
| The elite's boredom births monsters, and the vulnerable have become mere moving targets in an unending safari of the damned. | ||
| John Bowne reporting for InfoWars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever. | |
| The fights will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RealAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. | ||
| Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced. | ||
| This is the War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the InfoWars Austin headquarters here this Tuesday evening. | ||
| Hope everybody's doing well. | ||
| Remember to go to the AlexJonesStore.com to support absolutely everything that we do here. | ||
| There's always great discounts, but I like the one that we have on now. | ||
| You get $10 off your order. | ||
| It's simple. | ||
| It's not complicated. | ||
| You want $10 off your order. | ||
| You got a week to shop. | ||
| So don't waste time. | ||
| Go to the AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you. | ||
| And if you sign up for the VIP member, it costs $30. | ||
| You get $40 in store credit. | ||
| That's another $10. | ||
| Plus, you get that free $10 store credit, plus the 25 times entries to win the Jeep $392, plus $10,000 in cash. | ||
| You can win all of that with every purchase. | ||
| And you get that $10 off by going to the AlexJonesstore.com right now. | ||
| No minimum purchase required. | ||
| Just whatever you put in your cart, subtract the price by $10. | ||
| And that's our gift to you. | ||
| Now, we're getting connected with Elijah Schaefer right now, who has been pursued. | ||
| He's been pursued by the deep state recently. | ||
| And I'm very concerned about this. | ||
| And I'm worried that there are forces beyond our awareness that are manipulating all of this and utilizing supposed national security to demonize and repress American citizens. | ||
| It's very useful, national security. | ||
| It's a very useful term that you can basically apply to anything, and it lets you do whatever the hell you want with no explanation necessary. | ||
| And I have to wonder why it was Elijah Schaefer in particular that was targeted. | ||
| Why his referencing of Cash Petel's girlfriend was enough to inspire a $5 million lawsuit against him and why they would so outrageously claim that his security was a national security threat and had to be given extra pat downs at the airport in just what is clearly a abuse of power by the United States government. | ||
| I don't buy its coincidence. | ||
| And I don't think it has much to do with Kash Patel's girlfriend anyway, if you want to know the truth. | ||
| Now, Elijah Schaefer was one of the few people that responded in the way that he did to the attack against him. | ||
| Oh, he can't make it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. | |
| All right, I'm getting word from my producer right now. | ||
| So something came up. | ||
| Oh, geez. | ||
| All right. | ||
| I imagine we'll get the full story eventually. | ||
| Tomorrow, we'll reschedule for tomorrow. | ||
| So I've just been told that, I don't know, should I repeat that? | ||
| I mean, apparently there's an emergency situation that has occurred that's preventing Elijah Schaefer from safely getting to a place where he can broadcast. | ||
| So I hope he's all right. | ||
| I was just looking at his X account. | ||
| I didn't see anything about that. | ||
| That's very disturbing. | ||
| We were literally in the process of connecting with him when something occurred. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Well, we'll go ahead and cover what's happened to him because I do think it's worth covering and worth paying attention to and ties into everything else. | ||
| The reason I was saying that I think this might not have as much to do with the stated reason, the lawsuit against Elijah, is because he was one of the only content creators online that responded in the way that he did to Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
| Remember, Benjamin Netanyahu was on video talking about how they just took over TikTok and now X is the big battlefield that they have to take over, that this was an eight-front war and that eighth front is the most important. | ||
| It's the American information war. | ||
| He basically declares war against Americans. | ||
| And a lot of people were pissed at this. | ||
| I was pissed at this. | ||
| Of course, my reaction is typically more to laugh in their faces when they think they can silence Americans and don't understand the massive blowback they're inspiring. | ||
| They won't survive, to be honest with you, on a long enough timeline. | ||
| This strategy is a suicidal one that they're pursuing. | ||
| But Elijah got mad. | ||
| But Elijah got really mad and he made a video that went totally viral of him basically saying, bring it on. | ||
| You want to declare war, I accept. | ||
| And I can't help but wonder if that didn't piss certain people off. | ||
| And I can't help but wonder if Project Esther from the Heritage Organization, that is the stated design of the Israeli government and their collaborators here in America, operating hand in hand to silence opposition to the Greater Israel Project or basically anything Israel wants to do, combined with the $150 million that Israel has poured into their attempts to completely dominate our communication networks. | ||
| I can't help but wonder if all of these things didn't combine to put the target on Elijah Schaefer's head to let everyone know it doesn't matter if you're an American. | ||
| It doesn't matter if you have the protection of the First Amendment. | ||
| It doesn't matter if you are very careful about what you say and are careful to avoid things that could be legally dubious or, you know, get you in trouble with the court later. | ||
| It doesn't matter because they'll find something else to sue you for. | ||
| It doesn't matter because as long as you have a target on your back, they'll fire at you from whichever gun they can man. | ||
| And that's a message I think we should hear very clearly and then ignore outright. | ||
| We should understand that that's the threat being made and then deliberately throw it back in their face because they need to learn that this is not the way you treat Americans. | ||
| This is not the way you treat a free people. | ||
| And it's only going to get worse for you. | ||
| And it is getting worse for you. | ||
| It's getting so bad that even in the Jewish community now, there are opening up these riffs of Jewish people who now are on our side, are on my side, saying the behavior of the Ben Shapiros and Mark Levins out there seem like they're deliberately designed to make people hate Jews. | ||
| And you have Jews now who are not Ashkenazi, who are not in the club with Ben Shapiro and Mark Levin, that are realizing this whole thing is a psyop to get people to hate me, get people to hate us, right? | ||
| It's Jewish people saying this is not right. | ||
| I'll show you a clip. | ||
| This man's name is, well, I think it's the same guy. | ||
| I've got two videos. | ||
| They look very similar, but I actually don't know if they're the same guy. | ||
| Let's go to clip 30 here. | ||
| Let's go to clip 30 first because this guy actually has, I think, a clear view of the problems that Israel faces. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's also not dismissing what I know my value is to our community. | |
| Give me benefit of the doubt when I tell you we are losing this Gen Z war. | ||
| Please give me some credibility when I tell you that. | ||
| I'm literally out there. | ||
| If we do not put more diversity in Israel's brand, in the global Jewry brand, we're going to lose, guys. | ||
| We're going to lose. | ||
| It's such a shame that we have so much diversity and we're not talking about it. | ||
| And now you're saying, but Nima, that's fine. | ||
| But why did you go public? | ||
| I try to solve it privately. | ||
| I get ignored. | ||
| I get dismissed. | ||
| If I get dismissed in public, what do you think they do to me in private? | ||
| They dismiss me even more. | ||
| And creators like Talon and me just keep getting overlooked. | ||
| Yet Tal and me are way more better at maybe winning over Middle Eastern people and the world because they can't call us. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So I think this is the same guy. | ||
| It looks awful similar. | ||
| I think it's the same guy, Nima Yamini is his name. | ||
| Let's go to clip 26. | ||
| Here again is him talking about what it's like trying to stand up against anti-Semitism when you're sort of getting it from both sides. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know, after October 7, I spent about two years speaking up for Israel. | |
| And then recently, I came to an epiphany that Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, and these other elite European Ashkenazi Jews with their snobby attitude are causing more hatred for the Jewish community. | ||
| I spoke up about that. | ||
| And when I did, the sort of backlash I got is sort of, it didn't seem right to me. | ||
| You know, there was like, there was another vibe to it. | ||
| Then I say something like, hey, Middle Eastern Jews in Israel are not equally, you know, with the Ashkenazi European Jew. | ||
| And then I'm the racist. | ||
| If I say that there's never been one prime minister in the state of Israel that's a dark man like me, even though Ashkenazi European Jews only make up 38.1% of the population, I'm the bad guy. | ||
| No, Nima, be quiet. | ||
| Now's not the point. | ||
| Go sit in the back of the bus. | ||
| No, I'm not going to do that. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| I love Israel. | ||
| At the same point, I'm just going to stop getting involved in the Middle East. | ||
| My home is here in Miami Beach, Florida. | ||
| I got a nice wife, an adorable daughter, a successful business career, wonderful friends. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| Maybe I'll just stay out of the Middle East for a while. | ||
| I don't need to go there. | ||
| Let them figure it out. | ||
| And to the Jewish friends that I have, thank you to the Ashkenazi Jews who supported me when I asked for equality. | ||
| And to the Ashkenazi Jews who dismissed me, you're not really my friend. | ||
| You're not. | ||
| You use me. | ||
| And you're done using me. | ||
| You're done using me. | ||
| We're not friends. | ||
| You can unfollow me. | ||
| And to all the snakes that stabbed me in the back, it's all good. | ||
| All good. | ||
| I just want to say that when I log off, I got a beautiful life waiting for me. | ||
| And I'm going to focus more on that. | ||
| Much love, man. | ||
| I thought that was very interesting. | ||
| That's a, I guess, Sephardic Jews, sort of the two main categories of Jews, I guess, Sephardic or Ashkenazi. | ||
| And he's saying, basically, Israel is a racist apartheid state. | ||
| Not in so many words, but that clearly, you know, certain racial Jews are discriminated against by the Ashkenazi Jews. | ||
| And he sees Ben Shapiro and others like him and tries to sort of gently say, hey, you know, I don't think you're actually helping. | ||
| I don't think you're actually helping people understand why, you know, Jews should be supported. | ||
| You actually turn people against us. | ||
| And he gets attacked for that because, of course, he does. | ||
| Because there is a certain level of kind of narcissistic superiority the likes of Ben Shapiro feel that is offended when the reality is pointed out to them. | ||
| And we covered yesterday just some of the smattering, if you will, the smattering, the collection of Jewish organizations and events going on in the last month or so. | ||
| And the, I believe it is the Jewish Federation of North America, their General Assembly, is going on right now. | ||
| And they're talking about the way they need to basically silence everybody from talking about him. | ||
| Again, this just isn't going to work. | ||
| But clearly, as we heard yesterday from the president of the World Jewish Congress, he basically says everybody, Gen Z and up is a lost cause. | ||
| They're either, you know, firmly in our group and it's not going to change, or they're firmly against it. | ||
| It's not going to change. | ||
| So they're trying to reorganize, redesign elementary school curriculum so that they can get the next generation of people to be raised on a steady diet of pro-Zionist propaganda that hopefully will be embedded in their minds and there for eternity. | ||
| That, I think, is a deeply evil way to conduct foreign policy. | ||
| That hasn't stopped him before. | ||
| Let's go to a clip from this Federation of American Jews, clip number 18. | ||
| This is a former Obama speechwriter named Sarah Hurwitz. | ||
| And again, she's got some very interesting, a very interesting view of what's going on here. | ||
| I'll let you watch it. | ||
| I may interject, try to clarify what exactly it is she's really saying. | ||
| But here is former Obama speechwriter Sarah Hurwitz talking at the Jewish Federation. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I think that since October 7th, but really before then, there have been huge shifts in America on how people think about Jews in Israel. | ||
| And I think that is especially true of young people. | ||
| So we are now wrestling with a new, I think, generational divide here. | ||
| And I think that's particularly true in that social media is now our source of media. | ||
| And this, you know, it used to be that the media you got in America was American media, and it was pretty mainstream. | ||
| You know, it generally didn't express extreme anti-Israel views. | ||
| You had to go to a pretty weird bookstore to find global media and fringe media. | ||
| But today, we have social media, which is a global medium. | ||
| It is shaped, its algorithms are shaped by billions of people worldwide who don't really love Jews. | ||
| And so while in the 1990s, you know, a young person probably wasn't going to find Al Jazeera or someone like Nick Fuentes, today those media outlets find them. | ||
| They find them on their phones. | ||
| It's also this increasingly post-literate media, less and less text, more and more videos. | ||
| So you have TikTok just smashing our young people's brains all day long with video of carnage in Gaza. | ||
| And this is why so many of us can't have a sane conversation with younger Jews because anything that we try to say to them, they are hearing it through this wall of carnage. | ||
| So I want to give data and information and facts and arguments, and they are just seeing in their minds carnage, and I sound obscene. | ||
| And, you know, I think, unfortunately, the very smart, I think, bet that we made on Holocaust education to serve as anti-Semitism education in this new media environment, I think that is beginning to break down a little bit because Holocaust education is absolutely essential. | ||
| But I think it may be confusing some of our young people about anti-Semitism because they learn about big, strong Nazis hurting weak, emaciated Jews. | ||
| And they think, oh, anti-Semitism is like anti-black racism, right? | ||
| Powerful white people against powerless black people. | ||
| So when on TikTok all day long, they see powerful Israelis hurting weak, skinny Palestinians, it's not surprising that they think, oh, I know, the lesson of the Holocaust is you fight Israel. | ||
| You fight the big, powerful people hurting the weak people. | ||
| You know, it's like, I don't even know how to respond to this because it's such a warped view that she has. | ||
| And yet it's so closely aligns with truth. | ||
| Like, it's really hard to figure out how to contend with this. | ||
| So what she just said, let me just translate what she just said. | ||
| What she's saying is before people had the ability to communicate to anybody in the world, before the internet existed and social media existed, we could control what people saw. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Bookstores wouldn't publish quote-unquote anti-Semitic content. | ||
| And remember, when we say anti-Semitic, we don't actually mean driven by a senseless and irrational hatred of Jews. | ||
| We mean what they mean by anti-Semitism, which is legitimate criticism or just opposing Israel's bloodthirsty activity. | ||
| That's what they mean. | ||
| So when I say anti-Semitism here, remember that's what I mean. | ||
| So they're saying that when it was just a few networks on TV and we could control those, when it was just a few bookstores and the ADL could censor anybody trying to publish anything that didn't have our permission, then we were able to maintain the anger at Israel. | ||
| But now we don't control communications. | ||
| We don't control conversations. | ||
| Again, this is just echoing what Benjamin and Yahoo was saying because obviously they're trying to take over social media and change the algorithm so they do maintain that control. | ||
| And the conversations about reality that they don't want to have happen can be silenced or at least mitigated and made smaller. | ||
| You have to go to a pretty weird bookstore, she says, to find it. | ||
| Again, I've read a book called The Controversy of Zion. | ||
| It was written in the 1950s. | ||
| And he says in the 1950s, the ADL has a total vice-like grip on the publishing of any material from magazines, newspapers, to books. | ||
| Now it was in the 1950s. | ||
| Their power has not waned since then. | ||
| It has grown. | ||
| Then she talks about the carnage in Gaza. | ||
| It says basically she can't talk to younger Jews because what she's doing is justifying the horrific and unjustifiable images that we've seen. | ||
| This is why it's hard to explain. | ||
| It's like, yeah, lady, when somebody sees a brutalized child who's been ripped apart by a bomb that she can't even possibly understand why it's being dropped or who's doing it to her, and she's just been shredded in this utterly inhuman massacre, and you're sitting there going, yeah, but, okay, but let me explain why that it's a good thing that we did that. | ||
| Like, yeah, you're the bad one. | ||
| You're the evil one. | ||
| And when people see that and then see you trying to justify it, you're the bad guy. | ||
| This is why it's so weird. | ||
| It's like she gets it, but she doesn't care. | ||
| She's kind of like, it's too hard to try to justify carnage when they can see it everywhere. | ||
| It's like, yeah, lady, it's messed up. | ||
| Then it gets even crazier. | ||
| Then she says that the Holocaust education, she drops it really quick. | ||
| And I need the transcript of this. | ||
| In fact, I would love to see the transcript of this because she says the Holocaust education that we've spread that we've used as education on anti-Semitism. | ||
| So she sort of gives the game away a little bit there, right? | ||
| It's like, well, we want Holocaust education because we want to inform people about this tragedy that happened. | ||
| So we can inform people about what leads to it and how to prevent it in the future. | ||
| But she says that we've used as basically a vessel for anti-Semitism education, which means they're taking these classes, these by law required Holocaust classes in American schools, and they're in fact using it as religious programming, religious propaganda, sort of their religious and ethnic interest group over everybody else. | ||
| It doesn't have to have anything to do with the Holocaust. | ||
| That's just the vessel through which they try to minimize criticism of the Jewish people, which is sick and evil and wrong and obviously completely cynical and an insult to people who actually do care about the Holocaust. | ||
| Okay, so that's one thing. | ||
| Then she says it's backfired because now people are seeing what's happening in Gaza and they're relating it to the Holocaust. | ||
| So they've spent so much time and money and effort, sophisticated psychological programming to weaponize people's emotional reaction to the Holocaust. | ||
| And now they're regretting it because the exact same images are coming out of Gaza and people are accurately putting the two together and saying, you're doing what you have told us forever is the worst thing in the world to do. | ||
| That's wrong. | ||
| So it's like, again, she understands that, but doesn't acknowledge it, right? | ||
| It's so I guess she's saying that like the mistake was Educating people that the Holocaust was bad because of the killing and the murdering that was gone that went on. | ||
| They should have been more, you know, insistent to tell people it was bad because it was Jews that were the target. | ||
| And that if the same thing happens to people that aren't Jews, you're not supposed to be mad about it. | ||
| If it's the Jews doing the Holocaust, it's a good thing. | ||
| That's ridiculous. | ||
| That's asinine. | ||
| That's retarded. | ||
| So it's like, OK, if you want like what was the if the point of educating people was to hashtag never again was so that people would recognize a Holocaust when it was happening and intervene, unlike in World War II, where it was allowed to go on for a while. | ||
| We we didn't know about it until after the war. | ||
| Then you're getting exactly what you wanted. | ||
| I don't know if i've ever seen more of sort of a mask off moment from a former Obama speechwriter, by the way, who's like, yeah, we kill children and it's hard to explain that. | ||
| All right, welcome back folks. | ||
| We got some breaking news here. | ||
| Couple a couple examples of breaking news. | ||
| Actually unfortunately, Elijah Schafer is uh was, was not able to join us and uh, he has a very good reason why. | ||
| I'll leave it up to him to tell you why. | ||
| But, but we understand, but we understand and you will too, i'm sure, as soon as it's explained in public. | ||
| But uh yeah just uh, stay tuned, I guess. | ||
| But I just received this and i'm wondering, do we have the? | ||
| Do we have a video for this guys? | ||
| It's from the Blaze and it's um Steve Baker who has been, you know, leading the charge on exposing the january 6th pipe bomber. | ||
| Police walked right past DNC pipe bomb to first look under a bush, where the bomber sat 17 hours earlier. | ||
| So an eight inch long steel pipe with end caps, a kitchen timer, a nine volt battery and various wires planted in plain sight under a bench at the DNC building somehow escaped the notice of two Capitol police officers who walked right past it. | ||
| 15 minutes after a dispatcher warned of a pipe bomb at the nearby Republican National Committee building, the plane closed. | ||
| Counter surveillance officers instead proceeded straight to the Congressional Black Caucus Institute building a few hundred east of the DNC. | ||
| Quote was it placed and picked back up and then put back out again? | ||
| One of them stopped at a large bush along the alley that led up to the New Jersey Avenue. | ||
| At 103 p.m. | ||
| The officer backed up, ducked and peered under the shrub. | ||
| After a brief pause he stood back up and continued on the return trek to the DNC. | ||
| That's where he discovered the second pipe bomb just two minutes later. | ||
| These two bushes are the only ones the officers have been seen are seen looking under in the 11 minute and 14 seconds they're captured on available surveillance footage. | ||
| What was significant enough about the bush next to the CBCI building to warrant specific attention, and why has the FBI never disclosed this detail, so this is the footage of the pipe bomber right planting the bomb, if i'm not mistaken. | ||
| but then the footage they say they have Shows the Capitol Police officers looking under a shrub that the bomber had sat at 17 hours earlier. | ||
| So I think what they're saying is that the FBI had no reason to look under this bush unless they had been previously made aware that that's where the pipe bomber was. | ||
| I think that's what they're suggesting here. | ||
| A new review of the video footage shows that police officers stopped at the exact bush at which, 17 hours earlier, previously released footage shows the hoodie wearing pipe bomber sitting. | ||
| At 7:48 p.m. on January 5th, the suspect went one minute, spent one minute and 17 seconds near that bush, first bent over, then sitting down in front of the shrub. | ||
| Capitol Police security footage shows the suspect rummaged through a backpack while sitting cross-legged, then leaned into the bush and appeared to place or attempt to place something underneath. | ||
| Okay, so 17 hours before, in the evening of January 5th, you have, I guess, this footage that we're showing you of this pipe bomber acting suspiciously, sitting down, rummaging in his bag, seeming to look like he's placing something in a bush. | ||
| The suspect stood up after 77 seconds and walked to the DNC building. | ||
| There, the suspect sat on a park bench and at 7:54 p.m., placed a bite bomb under the adjacent bush video released by the FBI show. | ||
| On January 25th, a January 25th U.S. House investigative report said three teams were sent out to look for the explosives after a pipe bomb was found under the Capitol Hill Club at 12.43 p.m. on January 6th, 2021. | ||
| In a matter of seven minutes, early in the afternoon on January 6th, the USCP counter-surveillance team visited the same two venues as the pipe bomber did the night before. | ||
| While their assigned task was to search for explosives at potential targets around Capitol Hill, the only locations they can be seen on camera searching are the CBI bush and the bush by the DNC bench, where they found and reported the second pipe bomb. | ||
| The significance of the CBCI bush could not have been known to police at midday on January 6th. | ||
| So in other words, they're saying that because nothing was found there, because nothing was supposedly planted there, there was no reason that the police had to search there unless they already knew that that was a place that they should search. | ||
| In other words, they hadn't had time to go through the footage and see, okay, this person planted the bomb. | ||
| Here's where they went before. | ||
| We better go check those places at. | ||
| They hadn't uncovered the footage yet. | ||
| They hadn't discovered where this person was walking. | ||
| The cops, ostensibly, were just told there might be bombs. | ||
| There was a bomb at the RNC. | ||
| Let's go check the DNC, search the perimeter for bombs. | ||
| And instead of searching everywhere, they only searched two places, and it's the two places where the bomber was the previous night. | ||
| One place apparently didn't have anything there. | ||
| Nothing was discovered there. | ||
| So why did they search there? | ||
| How did they know where this person went if they hadn't done the investigation yet? | ||
| That could be huge. | ||
| That could be very, very damning information. | ||
| The bomber's visit to the first bush and possible attempt to plant a bomb there are only one of the many details the FBI has never divulged or even acknowledged. | ||
| The discovery was made by an independent video investigator known only as Armitas, who spent more than a year examining details of the January 6th pipe bomb case. | ||
| Blaze News has agreed not to print his legal name for security reasons. | ||
| Armitas has assisted Blaise in the ongoing January 6th investigations. | ||
| Armitas alleges that the Biden FBI digitally manipulated the video of the alleged bomber released to the public. | ||
| The Bureau also left out major details in its public disclosures, such as CBCI Bush and the alleged bombers' visits to the front garden of a congressional rooming house on C Street near the Capitol Hill Club. | ||
| The new wrinkles in the case only add intrigue to the long-unsolved January 6 mystery. | ||
| How could officers dispatched specifically to look for explosives around Capitol Hill miss the pipe bomb as they walked past the DNC building at 1258 p.m. | ||
| After discovery of the first pipe bomb came across Capitol Police dispatch at 1243, their unmarked vehicle spread from 3rd Street Southwest at East Street to the Capitol South Metro lot in under five minutes with emergency lights on part of the way. | ||
| Once parked in the metro lot, the men spent about three minutes putting on jackets and backpacks and grabbing gear from the hatchback. | ||
| They set off on foot down 1st Street to D Street, past New Jersey to South Capitol Street Southeast, then south to the DNC building. | ||
| They walked seven-tenths of a mile all the way from the Capitol South Metro station near the Republican National Committee building. | ||
| It does not appear the two men conducted searches along the way. | ||
| They stopped briefly near a dark SUV and other vehicles parked on the south side of D Street, directly across a patch of grass from the CBCI bush. | ||
| Other than that, security footage showed the only location they stopped to examine closely while on camera were the CBCI bush near the walking path and the DNC park bench. | ||
| So that's very interesting. | ||
| The Capitol Police surveillance cameras that normally cover the back of the DNC building were turned away by a command from the control room during this timeframe. | ||
| Because of this, the two plainclothes officers were off camera for three minutes and 54 seconds while they walked from the DNC to the CBCI. | ||
| So that's very interesting. | ||
| Attempts by Representative Massey and Barry Lautermilk to conduct transcribed interviews with the two officers named, who discovered the DNC pipe bomb, have been blocked by Capitol Police, Blaze News has learned. | ||
| According to the FBI, the DNC bomb sat at the foot of the park bench for 17 hours, escaping the notice of the U.S. Secret Service canine teams that swept the grounds hours earlier in anticipation of the 1130 a.m. by visitors by Vice President Harris. | ||
| Video shows at least two canine sweeps of the area after 11.30 a.m. on January 6th. | ||
| So, Loudermilk asks, why would the dog not hit on a pipe bomb that video shows was placed the night before? | ||
| To me, the only answer is that the pipe bomb was not there when the dog came by. | ||
| Either it was inert, which according to the FBI, it wasn't. | ||
| They say it had explosives in it, or it wasn't there. | ||
| But we have video of it being placed. | ||
| So now we need to know, was it placed and picked back up and then put back out again? | ||
| And if so, why? | ||
| Why did they go to that extent? | ||
| They were literally letting citizens walk within feet of the supposed pipe bomb. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
| So it seems like, you know, less answers, more questions with the pipe bomb case and more suspicious activity by Capitol Police officers that have been prevented by the bureaucracy from telling what they know to Congress. | ||
| Very, very interesting. | ||
| Steve Baker writes on X. | ||
| These two bushes are the only ones the officers have been seen looking under in the 11 minute and 14 seconds are captured on available surveillance footage. | ||
| One of many details the FBI has never divulged or even acknowledged. | ||
| Kyle Serafim says, so in a matter of seven minutes early in the afternoon on January 6th, the USCP counter-surveillance team visited the same two venues as the pipe bomber did the night before and found the bomb in under 12 minutes from dispatch. | ||
| So, it seems like without some ulterior explanation, I guess the only explanation would be no, there is no explanation. | ||
| Because I was going to say, what they could have done was found the bomb, immediately went back, scrubbed the surveillance footage, saw the person planting the bomb, followed them through the surveillance footage, saw that they stopped at these two bushes, sent people out there to investigate, but the timeframe is too small for that. | ||
| And if they did have the footage, if they were aware of this person, why wouldn't they go immediately to where the bomb is? | ||
| Why would they go to this other bush first? | ||
| Unless there's some miscommunication. | ||
| So, unless there's an ulterior explanation for this, it really reeks of foreknowledge. | ||
| And I can't think of another reason why they would go to those two bushes in particular when they supposedly didn't have any knowledge as to where the bombs were, where the bomber had been the night before. | ||
| Turns out they did have knowledge. | ||
| Where that knowledge came from is now the question. | ||
| That's very, very interesting. | ||
| And we'll look for any updates on that. | ||
| Now, the other breaking thing happening right now is that in Dearborn, Michigan, that has been the site of a number of outrageous examples of the far right's fixation on January 6th, pipe bomb suspect reaches FBI's that crazy far-right fixation on finding the person that planted the pipe bombs on January 6th. | ||
| Like the left didn't spend two years hunting down every single person except for the pipe bomber. | ||
| Yeah, our curiosity is not suspicious. | ||
| Your lack of curiosity is very suspicious when it comes to the pipe bomber. | ||
| Okay, again, I think I, you know, I've talked about it before. | ||
| You got to just be able to accept that, like, we're never going to get the truth about certain things, whether it's Jeffrey Epstein or the pipe bomber. | ||
| It's best just to take what we know, the context of what we know, and just fill in the blanks for yourself and understand that there's no way you're ever going to get total confirmation. | ||
| From my reading of the situation, the FBI planted the pipe bomb. | ||
| CIA planted the pipe bomb. | ||
| Somebody with knowledge of what was planned for January 6th planted those pipe bombs as the excuse to clear out the Capitol ahead of the planned riot. | ||
| I don't think I'll ever get confirmation of that. | ||
| I don't think evidence will ever be forthcoming for that. | ||
| But I can't think of a better scenario that so adequately contains all of the evidence that we have so far. | ||
| They never found this person. | ||
| That's suspicious. | ||
| They never even really looked for him. | ||
| That's suspicious. | ||
| They edited the video they did release. | ||
| That's suspicious. | ||
| He waves to the police as he walks down the road on video. | ||
| Yeah, nothing about this makes any sense unless you go, yeah, the cops are in. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| He's waving to the cop right there. | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| That might be the biggest piece of evidence out there. | ||
| Put yourself in the mindset of somebody walking around with two bombs you plan to plant to kill politicians. | ||
| Are you waving to the police when you're blacked out head to toe, you've got gloves on and a mask and a hoodie, but you wave to the police? | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So I don't expect the FBI to reveal this. | ||
| I don't expect the information to ever make its way to the light of day. | ||
| I don't need that. | ||
| I'm perfectly fine, just understanding that that's almost certainly what happened. | ||
| And that there's no other explanation I can fathom that contains all the evidence that we have already. | ||
| It was us. | ||
| It was a false flag. | ||
| It was perhaps the most pure example of a false flag we've seen in recent history. | ||
| Incredible stuff. | ||
| Now, I want to go to some other videos of what's happening right now. | ||
| Dearborn, Michigan has been the site of a number of conflicts between Muslim immigrants and Americans that they're oppressing. | ||
| And it has to do with the call to prayer blaring out at elevated levels at five in the morning and over and over again throughout the day. | ||
| And complaints about this being made by the citizenry who point out that it's actually against the law, that actually you aren't allowed to have speakers broadcasting music or anything without a permit. | ||
| And these people don't have permits, but they install the speakers anyway. | ||
| And people complain. | ||
| And so the city says, okay, we'll go check it out. | ||
| And then nothing happens. | ||
| And they keep blaring the call to prayer, despite it being against the ordinances of the city. | ||
| And then people are asking about why they're renaming streets after Islamic fundamentalists and being told by the mayor, you're not welcome here, white person. | ||
| You're not welcome here, Christian. | ||
| This is our town now. | ||
| And you go along with us, or you're not welcome here. | ||
| Just absolutely unacceptable. | ||
| We should not stand for it. | ||
| We don't need to stand for it. | ||
| And we need a major move against this. | ||
| Another post that's gone viral recently is talking about the, I believe, 48 new mosques that have started in Texas just around the Dallas-Fort Worth area in the last 24 months. | ||
| And in response, the governor of Texas has declared the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization in an attempt to prevent this from happening. | ||
| And I don't know how useful exactly protesting this will be because as it stands now, I don't think there is a law against what the Muslims are doing. | ||
| I mean, the call to prayer is illegal. | ||
| Like, you can stop that. | ||
| But what we need is a change of laws. | ||
| Like, if you really want to stop the overtaking of these cities by Muslims, who are just like, you know, outbreeding Americans, basically. | ||
| And now they're trying to do things where they're claiming to want to fight the collapsing birth rate. | ||
| And so they're talking about giving parents like $500 a month for every kid they have and have this kind of UBI system that they're implementing. | ||
| But it's being done by Muslims in Muslim-exclusive areas. | ||
| So basically, they're setting it up to where the American taxpayers, mostly white people, are just being stolen from and that cash is being given to Muslims so they can have more babies. | ||
| It's a pretty obvious tactic going on. | ||
| So if you want to stop that, you just have to pass a law to stop it. | ||
| And it's going to be in contradiction to the not legal, but sort of cultural thing we've been told that separation of church and state, you're not allowed to dictate what people's religion is. | ||
| But when you're a Christian country and there's another religion that is overtaking Christians and population and is forcing Christians to obey their laws, not Christian laws, like maybe you need a law against it. | ||
| Maybe you need a law that just says we're not going to allow this anymore. | ||
| And you don't have to try to justify it. | ||
| You don't have to try to argue, like, because you're never going to be able to argue with a Muslim person in America and say, you know, and get them to go, no, you're right. | ||
| Maybe we shouldn't have mosques here. | ||
| You know, good point. | ||
| Like, that's never going to happen. | ||
| The only thing that can possibly happen is the Christian majority just says, you know, we don't want to be Muslim, and so we don't want Muslim, you know, religious sites here, so you're not allowed to build them here. | ||
| That's the only path forward. | ||
| So if these protests are like bringing that about, then good. | ||
| But it needs to be focused on like a law that needs to be passed to stop this from happening. | ||
| And you got to be ready for a big fight from a lot of entrenched, powerful forces that don't want that. | ||
| But without like Christian nationalism, how do you prevent the birth rate, the immigration system? | ||
| I mean, you have to have a total redo of all this stuff to prevent this. | ||
| And you have to just make laws that just say we have a cap. | ||
| We have a cap of Muslims that we're letting settle here. | ||
| And that cap has been reached, and we're not going to welcome anymore. | ||
| And we're not going to give any permits for building mosques because we don't want to. | ||
| And that's that. | ||
| Again, there's nothing unfair about this. | ||
| I'll remind you again: Saudi Arabia has zero churches. | ||
| Zero. | ||
| Not like they put a cap on the number of churches. | ||
| There are zero churches in all of Saudi Arabia. | ||
| We're allies with them. | ||
| That's fine for them, right? | ||
| It's fine for us too. | ||
| If Muslim countries don't want to let Christians create religious institutions, that's their right. | ||
| And they can suck it up when we take the same path. | ||
| That is the only way, y'all. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| Yeah, Blackstone, Black Rock, Saturn. | ||
| It's all tied in together. | ||
| I consider Islam a branch of Judaism, but y'all aren't ready for that conversation. | ||
| Let's go to Nick Shirley here. | ||
| Nick Shirley is covering the Christian and Islamic protesters clashing in Dearborn, Michigan. | ||
| Qurans have been hit with bacon, and burning attempts of the Quran have happened. | ||
| This could get ugly. | ||
| Yeah, I think it could. | ||
| Let's watch Nick Shirley now. | ||
| Right now, here in Dearborn, Michigan, you have a group of Christian protesters who have came out here to Dearborn as it is the number one city for Islam here in the United States, as it is one of the only towns here in the United States where the majority of the population belong to the religion of Islam. | ||
| Some people have been attacked. | ||
| One man attempted to burn the Quran as he beat the Quran with bacon. | ||
| The police have now shown up. | ||
| Counter protesters are over here. | ||
| You have Palestinian protesters, Islamic protesters. | ||
| It has gone wild here. | ||
| People have been pepper sprayed. | ||
| Cam Higby was pepper sprayed. | ||
| And you're also seeing street takeovers as well. | ||
| As to have blocked up all of the road and now traffic is coming through. | ||
| And we've got, yes, sir, I got you. | ||
| And right now you have a bunch of people, and it's only about 3:30 right now. | ||
| It could get wild here in Dearborn, Michigan. | ||
| Let's see what happens. | ||
| So that's going on as we speak. | ||
| We can show the freedomnews.tv feed as well. | ||
| Large groups of Christians having taken to the street and marching against the Muslim takeover of Michigan. | ||
| Let's go to that video. | ||
| I'll read the sign here that they're carrying. | ||
| It says Americans Against Islam's Islamification. | ||
| And this march is being led by Jake Lang. | ||
| I believe that's him right there, J6, prisoner. | ||
| And like, look, I don't know. | ||
| You got to, I mean, either you got to pass laws to stop this or like that's it. | ||
| That's the only possible way to solve this issue. | ||
| You just have to ban it. | ||
| Unless you can come up with another one. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'll open up phone lines in the next hour. | ||
| Maybe somebody can call in with a different idea of how to prevent this. | ||
| But unless you just say, I don't even understand really what the method is for Texas for like banning the Muslim Brotherhood and then trying to relate the Muslim Brotherhood to some of the building permits. | ||
| Like, why don't we just say no? | ||
| How about we're the authorities here? | ||
| This is a Christian country. | ||
| We're built on Christian principles and that's at risk. | ||
| So in order to preserve our national character, we're putting a stop to the Muslim integration, the Muslim growth of population here in America. | ||
| Like we just have to put a stop to it. | ||
| You don't have to have their permission. | ||
| You don't have to get them to go along with this. | ||
| It's our country. | ||
| We can just say no. | ||
| If it's your house and your guests are just setting up a tent in your living room, you don't have to negotiate with them. | ||
| You can just say, I don't want you living here. | ||
| You have to leave now. | ||
| It's my house. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| Go get your own house. | ||
| It's as simple as that. | ||
| It has to be as firm as that. | ||
| Or else what other move is there? | ||
| So I don't know. | ||
| I mean, there's like a million little legalistic ways you could go after this. | ||
| Obviously, if you're talking about Sharia law, like full-fledged Shia law, that is literally illegal. | ||
| You can't discriminate in the way that Sharia law commands that you do. | ||
| You can't oppress women in the way that it says you're supposed to. | ||
| There's a way to do it, but it's just all so inconvenient. | ||
| How about you just say, we're not building any more mosques? | ||
| You have reached your limit, and that's the number that you're going to be able to build. | ||
| And once you're at maximum capacity, you know, that's it. | ||
| You want to build a Muslim, you got to go somewhere. | ||
| You want to build a mosque? | ||
| You got to go somewhere else to do it. | ||
| Sorry, that's just the way it is. | ||
| Unless somebody else has a better suggestion, I'll open up lines to your calls, but I'll get into what the real threat of this is. | ||
| It actually gets crazy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, folks, welcome back. | |
| We're monitoring more developments from the anti-Muslim protest in Dearborn. | ||
| Cam Higbee is there as well. | ||
| And I'm kind of confused by this whole thing. | ||
| It's supposedly a Christian march. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'm very confused by all of this, but Cam Higbee says, Muslim anti-protester, Muslim anti-protester says Dearborn Police Department is the best police department. | ||
| The police presence has dwindled to just two officers who are letting violent Muslim counter-protesters and Antifa terrorists act with impunity against journalists and Christian protesters. | ||
| So apparently multiple of the Christian protesters have been assaulted and the cops are just standing by allowing it to happen in the same way that happens in Portland with Antifa or Seattle with Antifa or LA with illegal immigrants throwing rocks at cop cars. | ||
| I really like there are times I wish I could just like force these cops to sit down. | ||
| Wouldn't it be nice just to be able to like sit the cop down and go, what the hell are you thinking? | ||
| What is going on in your mind? | ||
| What is happening that makes you think it's okay to allow violent people to attack Trump supporters? | ||
| Why is that happening? | ||
| What is the calculus going on in their head? | ||
| And you can see this guy is just pretending to be completely deaf. | ||
| He's taking that, you know, Allison Spanberger tactic of just pretending you don't answer that you don't hear the question, so you don't have to answer it. | ||
| There's the cop just watching on impotently as the Muslims like celebrate, yeah, we can get away with anything here. | ||
| Let's watch the video. | ||
| Officer, why are they able to make threats unfettered? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They haven't. | |
| Why do they have total impunity out here? | ||
| They've attacked me. | ||
| They've hempersprayed me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Nothing has happened. | |
| They punch Jake in the face. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They sprayed Jake. | |
| They have total impunity. | ||
| I just put a new video in there. | ||
| Apparently, a conservative protester has been arrested at this anti-Muslim protest. | ||
| Let me drop that video in. | ||
| So these videos are breaking sort of by the minute, and it does seem to be going down there in Dearborn. | ||
| Christian protester gets removed by police after he's spit on by a Muslim. | ||
| So we're going to drop these videos. | ||
| I'll drop these videos in and go to these as they break. | ||
| Let's go to this first one: breaking conservative protester arrested at the anti-Islam protest. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| They arrested a conservative. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's not what they arrested me. | |
| We're on here to do that. | ||
| What are you arresting him for? | ||
| What are you arresting him for? | ||
| What's the probable cause? | ||
| What's the probable cause? | ||
| You have to state a legal reason for arresting this man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is it? | |
| What is the legally stated reason for arresting this man? | ||
| What is a legally recognized reason for arresting this man? | ||
| What's the probable cause? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is the probable cause? | |
| Name and badge number. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Name and badge number. | |
| They won't arrest a single Muslim. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's been multiple attacks, but of course they'll arrest somebody on the other side immediately. | |
| What is the probable cause for arresting him? | ||
| Officer, were you here just a second ago? | ||
| When the guy got arrested? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Habeas corpus, articulate suspicion for arresting that man. | |
| Name and badge number, please. | ||
| Name and badge number. | ||
| Name and badge number, please, sir. | ||
| Name and badge number. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want your name and your badge number. | |
| Are you denying me your name and your badge number? | ||
| Are you denying it? | ||
| Are you denying name and badge number? | ||
| Get out of my face. | ||
| Don't touch me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Don't touch me. | |
| Stop. | ||
| You'll do what? | ||
| I want his name and badge number. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have a legally recognized name and badge number. | |
| I'm asking name and badge number. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're not going to do that. | |
| You're not going to do that. | ||
| Officer's following his face, threatening him. | ||
| And the cops are right there. | ||
| They've just arrested a conservative person, refused to give their name or why the person was being arrested. | ||
| And as he tries to get the cop to give him his name and badge number, the Muslims are getting in his face, pushing the back. | ||
| Wow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's us against the world, folks. | |
| It's us against the world. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the third hour of the war room. | ||
| We're watching the developing chaos at the anti-Sharia law protests in Dearborn, Michigan. | ||
| Cam Higby's on the scene shown this video. | ||
| Let's start this one over from the beginning. | ||
| Keep the audio low at first, and then we'll be able to bring it up a little bit because there are some curse words at the beginning. | ||
| But laying out what happened here, you'll see a black guy that's sort of the subject to the beginning. | ||
| He's a Christian protester that apparently, right before the video starts, some guy spit in his face. | ||
| And you see the black guy's like pretty angry about it. | ||
| Cam Higbee then goes and tells an officer, hey, the guy in the green scarf, just spit in his face, and the police go and arrest the guy who was spit on, even though he didn't do anything in retaliation. | ||
| So we're going to get into in this segment some various ways in which our systems of authority in this country are absolutely being turned against us. | ||
| Like, if you didn't think we were in a sort of soft, cold civil war yet, how many places is this the case? | ||
| As I just laid out, in LA, you had illegal immigrants riding with impunity for days on end, throwing, you know, cement blocks at cop cars, and the cops basically just giving up in return. | ||
| In Portland, you've had hundreds of days on end of Antifa attacking federal agents and getting no support from the local cops there. | ||
| In Chicago, you have the same thing. | ||
| In North Carolina, we'll get into that. | ||
| It's as bad as anywhere because a sixth of their city is foreign-born. | ||
| God only knows how many illegal immigrants are amongst that. | ||
| I mean, that's one-sixth of the population that we know about that are the, I guess, legal foreign-born. | ||
| And now in Hamtranck, Michigan and Dearborn, Michigan, you have a protest, a legally permitted anti-Muslim, anti-Sharia law protest. | ||
| And just like you have with Antifa in Portland, just like you have with the rioters and anti-ICE activists in Chicago, the police and the authority structures there are clearly on the side of the anti-American agitators. | ||
| The violent ones, the hostile ones, for some reason, have the full support of our entire power structure. | ||
| This is like sincerely depressing. | ||
| Let's go to this video. | ||
| A breaking Christian protester at anti-Muslim rally gets spit on, and then he's the one that gets in trouble. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| We kind of keep the audio down a little bit. | ||
| There's the guy. | ||
| You see sort of like he's pissed. | ||
| He's very mad. | ||
| He just got spit in the face. | ||
| But he doesn't hit anybody. | ||
| Doesn't actually touch anybody. | ||
| There's the guy that spit on him. | ||
| The guy in the green scarf. | ||
| Now we bring the audio up. | ||
| And you can see the cameraman, Cam Higby, goes to find a cop right here. | ||
| He finds this female officer. | ||
| Listen. | ||
| He says he's spit in his face. | ||
| The guy in the green. | ||
| Now a cop grabs the Christian protester and starts walking him away. | ||
| So the guy that spit in the Christian protester's face wasn't taken to the side. | ||
| Now you've got this Christian who just was spit in his face, and you can see he was pissed, but doesn't throw a punch, doesn't actually attack back. | ||
| Now he's being pressed up against the police SUV with an officer with his hands on his shoulders pressing him back like he's the one that needs to be contained. | ||
| Like he's the one that needs to be talked down to and restrained. | ||
| He had his face spit in. | ||
| He didn't hit anybody. | ||
| He didn't push anybody. | ||
| He didn't spit in anybody's face. | ||
| But he's the one that they are now manhandling and shoving against SUV. | ||
| And we just saw another Christian protester be arrested. | ||
| And as they talk to the cops and say, what are you doing? | ||
| Why aren't you protecting the Christians? | ||
| The Muslims are just laughing in their face and saying this is our police officer. | ||
| This is our police department now. | ||
| Okay, we can go to another video here. | ||
| Absolute chaos. | ||
| Dearborn police are allowing, just like in all these other places, allowing the violent rioters to commit violence with impunity while arresting and manhandling the Christian protesters that are there just speaking their minds. | ||
| Let's go to the absolute chaos clip here. | ||
| This is absolutely insane. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's mayhem. | |
| The Muslims are allowed to do whatever they want with impunity. | ||
| The officers haven't arrested any of them. | ||
| There's been repeated assaults. | ||
| I was bear sprayed. | ||
| Haley, you're too bad time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was bear spray or pepper sprayed, OC sprayed, whatever. | |
| Jake got sprayed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They didn't do anything. | |
| He just got punched in the face and officer Washington did nothing. | ||
| They're all masked up. | ||
| They say, go to the station later. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If this isn't Sharia police, I don't know what is. | |
| They just watched Jake get hit in the head. | ||
| Did nothing. | ||
| He gave up, punched him right in the face. | ||
| Again, it's just, you know. | ||
| What do you call this? | ||
| I mean, this is a takeover. | ||
| This is a real insurrection. | ||
| You want to talk about a real insurrection? | ||
| From Chicago to L.A. to Seattle to Portland to North Carolina to Dearborn, Michigan, to New York City. | ||
| In every one of these places, hostile foreigners or hostile anarchists have taken control, the reins of power, and are allowing the abuse of American citizens and an elimination of their rights. | ||
| There's no excuse to allow, you know, a Muslim guy to punch Jake Lang in the face and not arrest him. | ||
| Just like there's no excuse to allow illegal immigrants to throw cinder blocks at cop cars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But that's where we're at. | |
| It's about to get significantly worse. | ||
| And it's coming from all sides. | ||
| Yeah, we got to do something about this. | ||
| If this is allowed to continue, I mean, it's only going to accelerate. | ||
| If they're already just allowing the just abject abuse of American Christians or American patriots or federal agents, even I'll say, I do not think Trump is the man for this job. | ||
| I don't think he's up to it. | ||
| I think if Trump was the character that the left portrays him as, we might have a fighting chance here. | ||
| But the more I see from the way that our municipalities are just as hijacked and corrupt and weaponized against us as the federal government, you know, it becomes really kind of overwhelming what it's going to take to wrestle control back into the hands of actual Americans. | ||
| And this is all part and parcel with something I was going to cover today anyway, which is why this is all hitting me even harder, I think. | ||
| Let's go to clip 16 here. | ||
| Let's go to clip 16 Because this is crazy. | ||
| I mean, I know we talk about crazy stuff all the time, but it just gets crazier and crazier. | ||
| And you're about to see elected representatives, former CIA officers, military officers, and a variety of Democrat authority figures urging the U.S. military to disobey orders. | ||
| This is as clear-cut of an example of sedition as you could ever possibly want. | ||
| And so not only do you have these people in these positions of power, but these seditious concepts are so common, they feel absolutely no risk, no shame, no compunction about putting these statements to video and releasing it. | ||
| And I think it's long, long past due that these people are made an example of. | ||
| For the sake of our country, we have to have sort of extreme movements against these people. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 16 here. | ||
| These are Democrats urging the U.S. military to commit treason. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I'm Senator Alyssa Slotkin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator Mark Kelly. | |
| Representative Chris DeLuzio. | ||
| Congresswoman Maggie Goodlander. | ||
| Representative Chrissy Houlihan. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Congressman Jason Crowe. | |
| Yeah, I was a captain in the United States Navy. | ||
| Former CIA officer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Former Navy. | |
| Former paratrooper and Army Ranger. | ||
| Former intelligence officer. | ||
| Former Air Force. | ||
| We want to speak directly to members of the military and the intelligence community who take risks each day to keep Americans safe. | ||
| We know you are under enormous stress and pressure right now. | ||
| Americans trust their military. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But that trust is at risk. | |
| This administration is pitting our uniformed military and intelligence community professionals against American citizens. | ||
| Like us, you all swore an oath. | ||
| To protect and defend this Constitution. | ||
| Right now, the threats to our Constitution aren't just coming from abroad, but from right here at home. | ||
| Our laws are clear. | ||
| You can refuse illegal orders. | ||
| You can refuse illegal orders. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You must refuse illegal orders. | |
| No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution. | ||
| We know this is hard and that it's a difficult time to be a public servant. | ||
| But whether you're serving in the CIA, the Army, or Navy, the Air Force, your vigilance is critical. | ||
| And know that we have your back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because now, more than ever, the American people need you. | |
| We need you to stand up for our laws, our Constitution, and who we are as Americans. | ||
| Don't give up. | ||
| Don't give up the ship. | ||
| Yeah, that's crazy. | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| You just had senators and congressmen and CIA agents and intelligence officers directly speaking to CIA members and members of the military and telling them you must disobey orders. | ||
| Now, we've talked forever about the fact that Stuart Rhodes and the Oath Keepers rose to prominence and on their website was a list of the 10 orders you're obligated to refuse. | ||
| And they're very simple and clear. | ||
| And it is a law that you can and should disobey unlawful orders when and only when they are obviously and inarguably illegal. | ||
| Absolutely nothing that Trump has ordered anyone to do so far even approaches the threshold that would allow for that type of sentiment. | ||
| I asked Grock about this just to get all the research in one place. | ||
| In most countries, there are explicit laws against encouraging members of the armed forces to disobey lawful orders, commit mutiny, or undermine military discipline. | ||
| The exact name and scope of the law vary by country, but here are the main examples. | ||
| In the United States, 18 U.S. Code 2387, activities affecting armed forces generally says this: it prohibits knowingly advising, counseling, urging, or in any manner causing or attempting to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty by any member of the U.S. military. | ||
| The penalty is up to 20 years in prison and/or a fine. | ||
| Okay, that's exactly what we just saw. | ||
| Let me read it again: prohibits knowingly advising, counseling, urging, or in any manner causing or attempting to cause insubordination, disloyalty, mutiny, or refusal of duty. | ||
| And we just saw senators and congressmen make a video with big bold letters saying you must disobey your orders. | ||
| Every single one of these people, I think, should be charged and convicted for 20 years in prison. | ||
| How could this be anything except for that? | ||
| Okay, let me continue. | ||
| A wartime version of that same prohibition is in 18 U.S. Code 2388, and the punishment is not just 20 years, it's up to 20 years or death if it results in deaths or seriously undermines the war effort. | ||
| Now, we're not technically in war, that might not apply, but it doesn't need to. | ||
| The Uniform Code of Military Justice also applies to service members who encourage mutiny or sedition. | ||
| Mutiny or sedition is Article 94, up to death in wartime is the punishment for that. | ||
| Article 134, general article, can cover conduct bringing discredit upon the armed forces or provoking speeches or gestures. | ||
| These laws have been used historically against anti-war activists during the Vietnam War who directly urged soldiers to refuse deployment. | ||
| Well, is that not exactly the same that we just saw? | ||
| Because actually, when you get into the actual laws, there are certain things that you're really not allowed to claim and others that you can, right? | ||
| The critical distinction between lawful and unlawful orders and who gets to decide that has been litigated for centuries and is settled in every modern military justice system the same way. | ||
| One, the order is presumed lawful until proven otherwise. | ||
| Every order from a superior is to be presumed lawful. | ||
| The soldier, sailor, or airman must obey first and challenge later, the obey first, grieve later rule. | ||
| Disobeying on the spot is only justified if the order is manifestly that is obviously or blatantly illegal, and a reasonable person would instantly recognize it as much as such. | ||
| So, the case of like the oath keepers, it was like if you're ordered to go house to house and seize weapons, that's illegal. | ||
| Obviously, manifestly disallowed by the Second Amendment of the Constitution, which is the law of the land. | ||
| That's illegal, and you don't need a scholar to tell you that. | ||
| Or other examples that they give where it's like, if a superior officer urges you to rape a captive, yeah, you can resist that order, you can disobey that order, okay? | ||
| But until the Border Patrol issues issuing orders to their agents to rape the detainees, like you have no right to refuse to participate in lawful actions. | ||
| Continues. | ||
| What counts as manifestly unlawful order? | ||
| The classic formulation comes from the post-World War II tribunals and is now embedded in the law of armed conflict in every Western military manual. | ||
| An order is manifestly unlawful when it is so obviously illegal that any person of ordinary sense and understanding would know it to be illegal. | ||
| Examples that the courts have repeatedly ruled are manifestly unlawful, so refusal is protected, are things like ordering troops to shoot unarmed civilians or POWs for sport. | ||
| Okay, good. | ||
| Ordering a rape or torture. | ||
| Okay, can't do that. | ||
| Ordering the summary execution of prisoners. | ||
| Those are manifestly illegal, unlawful, and can be refused. | ||
| Nothing like that has ever been ordered by the American authorities for the American military or Border Patrol or anybody else. | ||
| That's not what those people were saying. | ||
| Do you think they would have made an announcement if that was their point? | ||
| Yeah, everybody knows. | ||
| Everybody knows that no Border Patrol agent is being ordered to rape their captives. | ||
| Okay, you don't need to tell anybody to refuse an order. | ||
| That would never exist. | ||
| Examples that are not considered manifestly unlawful, and so refusal is punishable, are things like deploying to a war the soldier believes is immoral or unconstitutional, which is what I would label their screed under. | ||
| Oh, you just don't like the orders that are given. | ||
| You just don't like that we're at war with the invading forces that have taken over our country. | ||
| Too bad. | ||
| We voted for a president specifically to wage this war. | ||
| Enforcing a curfew or lockdown the soldier thinks violates domestic law. | ||
| Participating in a military operation the soldier believes violates international law. | ||
| Refusing vaccination mandates, mask mandates, or diversity training. | ||
| Refusing to use certain weapons the soldier believes are illegal, e.g., cluster munitions, drones, unless a court has already ruled them illegal in that context. | ||
| Who decides whether the order was unlawful? | ||
| Not the individual soldier at the time of refusal, a military court, or in extreme cases, a civilian federal court after the fact. | ||
| The burden is on the accused to prove the order was manifestly unlawful, and the threshold is intentionally very high. | ||
| Real world cases that illustrate this. | ||
| Marines refused Vietnam deployment, claiming the war was illegal. | ||
| They were convicted. | ||
| The court ruled the legality of the war is a political question, not a manifestly unlawful order. | ||
| Which again, I would say, directly applies to what we're talking about today. | ||
| Somebody, Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin, refused deployment, claiming Obama birth certificate issue made the chain of command invalid. | ||
| He was court-martialed and imprisoned. | ||
| Again, I think another sort of similar situation here. | ||
| So what are we going to do about this? | ||
| What are we going to do about this? | ||
| Senators and congressmen and former CIA agents are making videos where they are explicitly breaking the law and doing things that should, under any reasonable application of the laws on the books, should see them in prison for 20 years if not killed by the state with the death penalty. | ||
| And if nothing happens to these people, that would be the worst thing. | ||
| I mean, hey, you want to indict them and they can prove they get the lawyers and the ACLU gets involved and they make a big deal out of it and they eventually get away with it. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| Put them through it. | ||
| But you have to at least put them through it. | ||
| You know, there's more to this that I'll get to the other side because, again, this is almost ubiquitous here. | ||
| And you really like we, our country cannot survive what's happening. | ||
| You know, it, and it's, it's, it's almost, it's like weird because it's like, okay. | ||
| Why doesn't Trump just actually do it? | ||
| Why doesn't Trump just, I mean, he's playing by the book so carefully. | ||
| He's listening to all the judges inter interventions. | ||
| He's trying to let the local governments deal with it their way. | ||
| And they're sitting here making videos encouraging the armed forces to disobey orders. | ||
| They're actively trying to disrupt the chain of command in this country, just like they have already done in the past. | ||
| Remember after January 6th, or maybe even before January 6th, I mean, it happened multiple times. | ||
| You had General Milley, first of all, contacting China outside of the chain of command to undercut the president's ability to serve as our chief diplomat. | ||
| And he worked with Nancy Pelosi and basically said, you know, we've taken the nuclear football from Donald Trump. | ||
| We have decided that the chain of command is no longer the chain of command, and actually the person you voted for is not in charge anymore. | ||
| I am. | ||
| And time and time again, they've been able to get away with this. | ||
| And so when you have the federal government and congressmen and senators employing the U.S. military to disobey orders at the same time that you have mayors and city councilmen and local police departments enforcing the law against Trump supporters, but not against anybody else, as it's the other people that are violently attacking, like, where is the authority? | ||
| Where is our side? | ||
| Where is Trump? | ||
| Where is the federal government? | ||
| Where is the justice? | ||
| I got a crazy headline here. | ||
| Washington man severely ill with unpredictable virus never seen in humans before. | ||
| Cool. | ||
| Very cool. | ||
| And a startling first, a Washington state man has been infected with a strain of bird flu previously only detected in animals and never before in humans. | ||
| The severely ill man was hospitalized with a high fever, confusion, and respiratory distress earlier this month and confirmed to have H5N5, a subset of avian influenza carried by wild birds like duck and geese. | ||
| The Washington State Department of Health described the unidentified patient as being older and having underlying health conditions. | ||
| The agency noted that a man has a mixed backyard flock of domestic poultry at his home in Grays Harbor County in the southwest Pacific coast of the state. | ||
| Wild birds could also access the property with agency officials believing that either set of birds is most likely the source of the virus exposure. | ||
| The man remains hospitalized as of last week while the investigation continues. | ||
| The risk to public is low, according to Washington health officials and the CDC. | ||
| No one else has tested positive for H5N5. | ||
| There's no evidence of person-to-person spread, though experts have acknowledged that viral evolution can be unpredictable. | ||
| Well, especially when you're running gain of function experiments in unqualified labs, but not like they would do that, right? | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| A bird flu that has never been infected in humans, never been detected in humans before has infected a man in Washington state. | ||
| I have to say, I just meant the last segment showing the Protest in Dearborn, Michigan against the Islamic takeover and describing the way that Muslims have taken over Dearborn, the police department apparently interacting with impunity and assaulting and attacking Christian protesters there that want this to remain a Christian country. | ||
| And then I get tweets from people saying you're obviously pro-Islamic because you're not covering it hard enough. | ||
| What? | ||
| What am I supposed to say? | ||
| I'm literally advocating for a law to make it illegal to build mosques. | ||
| Like, do you ever stop to think maybe you're aimed at the wrong person here? | ||
| It's like, it's just crazy, man. | ||
| The division, the constant false dichotomy. | ||
| It's like you aren't angry enough at the full-blown Muslim takeover of Dearborn, Michigan. | ||
| Therefore, you're obviously an anti-Semite that's an Islamo-fascist. | ||
| I want you all gone. | ||
| I don't want any of you around me. | ||
| I'm sick of the Muslims. | ||
| I'm sick of the Jews. | ||
| I'm sick of the pagans. | ||
| I'm sick of the pussy Christians. | ||
| You're all pathetic and worthless, as far as I can tell. | ||
| You are all damaging my culture and my community and my people relentlessly, constantly, forever. | ||
| You all want me to take up your little particular crusade. | ||
| I want to lead a crusade against all of you. | ||
| I think that might be what we, I think we might need that at this point. | ||
| Do you want to see how messed up it is? | ||
| Do you want to hear how utterly screwed the American people are when you have all of these disparate foreign interests controlling not just our federal government through blackmail, but our local governments through pressure campaigns? | ||
| Do you want to know how utterly absurd it's gotten, folks? | ||
| Let's listen to the new mayor of New York, Zorhan Mamdani, as he literally secedes from the Union. | ||
| He is saying that the New York government will no longer obey orders from the U.S. federal government and instead is pledging loyalty and fealty to international courts located in The Hague. | ||
| This is a constitutional crisis. | ||
| This is a civil war. | ||
| And I want Trump or whoever is in the White House and doesn't have their head up their butt or their name on the Epstein list to order the U.S. military back from abroad to crush all of this with an iron boot. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| Have I not made it clear what I want? | ||
| I want everyone involved with Epstein to be tried, convicted, and hung. | ||
| I want everybody involved in the attempt to get us to war with Iran equally strung up. | ||
| I want every mosque Bulldozed to the ground in this country and all of their attendants sent overseas. | ||
| Have I not made this clear? | ||
| I want the entire DSA declared illegal and everyone who's ever contributed to them thrown into prison. | ||
| Have I not been forthright about this? | ||
| Our country is being destroyed. | ||
| Our people are being genocided. | ||
| Our political establishment is being ripped apart by a thousand different cuts. | ||
| And the people that we have suffered and fought for are spending the vast majority of their time hunting down anti-Semites and covering up for Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| I am so far beyond rage, I'm simmering now. | ||
| Like it's, I can't even yell about this stuff anymore. | ||
| It's so persistent. | ||
| It's so ridiculous. | ||
| It's so continuous and unabated. | ||
| And I'm on the radio talking to millions of people. | ||
| I can't actually say the details of what I think should happen. | ||
| I expect you to be able to read between the lines. | ||
| Let's go to Zorhan Mamdani as he, like 15,000 other people that we've seen today, does something that in any reasonable nation that actually wanted to exist into the next century would be treating with harshness reserved for rabid dogs. | ||
| For some reason, we can't get a goddamn indictment for this stuff. | ||
| A statement from the Trump administration. | ||
| Here's Zorhan Mamdani. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You said you would arrest Benjamin Netanyahu based on the 2024 International Court Arrest Warrant. | |
| Next UN General Assembly, as mayor, would you do that? | ||
| So I've said time and again that I believe this is a city of international law. | ||
| And being a city of international law means looking to uphold international law. | ||
| And that means upholding the warrants from the International Criminal Court, whether they're for Benjamin Netanyahu or Vladimir Putin. | ||
| I think that that's critically important to showcase our values. | ||
| And unlike Donald Trump, I'm someone who looks to exist within the confines of the laws that we have. | ||
| So I will look to exhaust every legal possibility, not to create my own laws to do so. | ||
|
unidentified
|
On the other hand, this is also a world event. | |
| Does that not count a little bit? | ||
| Well, I think we are a global city, but I also think what New Yorkers are looking for is consistency in the way in which we talk about our values and follow through on them. | ||
| And that's why I think these warrants from the International Criminal Court, they are worth fully exploring every legal possibility to actually follow through on. | ||
| New York is a city of international law? | ||
| No. | ||
| No, New York is a city of American law. | ||
| International law doesn't exist. | ||
| It's not a thing. | ||
| For a law to exist, it has to have a power structure to enforce that law. | ||
| So Zorhan Mamdani, who refuses to comply with federal law enforcement when it comes to immigration, will enforce international law when it comes to arrest warrants. | ||
| So if the international court were to decide that Donald Trump is a war criminal, would they arrest Donald Trump? | ||
| Would international law supersede American law in that situation? | ||
| I don't know why it wouldn't. | ||
| When you have the mayor of a city who is their executive, it's their chief law enforcement officer Claim that they're no longer abiding by American law, but instead abiding by international law, you have to do something about that. | ||
| That's a declaration of independence. | ||
| That's a declaration of loyalty to a foreign body by the mayor of New York City, who didn't become a citizen until 2019. | ||
| You have somebody who's been a U.S. citizen for less than six years as head of New York City saying he's not complying with American law, but will be complying with international law. | ||
| That's not the craziest part. | ||
| That's far from the craziest part. | ||
| In response to this, listen to what former mayor of New York Eric Adams said to an IDF officer in Israel. | ||
| Clip 17. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In the city of New York, that is going to have a lot of packages to directive from India. | |
| And he knows that. | ||
| So the mere fact that he continues to state that, it tells us that he's more concerned about the volatile benefit that feeds to his party, the DSA Democratic Socialist America. | ||
| This is what they want to hear here. | ||
| This is what they believe. | ||
| And their anti-Israel energy is misguided. | ||
| Israel has been a real partner in the stability of public safety to neutralize Iran, neutralize Hezbollah, neutralize ISIS, neutralize Hamas. | ||
| These are the same people that not only call for the destruction of Israel, they call for the destruction of America. | ||
| And so he wants to be in greatest goals who call for the destruction of America, and you want to be the mayor of America's largest city. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Something is abnormal about that. | |
| You might want to wipe your mouth after that, Mayor Adams. | ||
| Did you already said in the beginning there? | ||
| He was asked about the comment Mamdani made where he said he would arrest Benjamin Nanyahu. | ||
| And look, Benjamin Nanyahu is a war criminal. | ||
| He should be in prison. | ||
| The ICC is actually right. | ||
| But this is more important than that. | ||
| This is about who has authority in this country and whether it's people we actually elect and have a say in or whether it is people that have never even been a part of our country. | ||
| Apparently some cabal of psychos in The Hague in Brussels gets to dictate to Americans what we do. | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| So he's asked about this. | ||
| He's asked, Mamdani says he'll arrest Benjamin Nanyahu if he goes to New York City. | ||
| Did you hear what Eric Adams' response was? | ||
| If he gives that order, no one will follow it because the people in the ranks are more loyal to Netanyahu than the American power structure. | ||
| The same thing I was joking when Trump and Netanyahu were butting heads and Netyahoo was coming over to America and it was a joke, but I said he's about to arrest Netanyahu. | ||
| And the response I got was no one would follow that order. | ||
| Do you realize what a gigantic problem that is? | ||
| Like, do you realize how messed up? | ||
| So you've got the mayor of New York saying he would arrest Netanyahu because it's international law and he would be loyal to international law over American law because he refuses to comply with things like ICE or other federal orders from our government, but would arrest Netanyahu. | ||
| When asked about this, Eric Adams says he can order people to arrest Nanyahu, but the rank and file in the NYBD is more loyal to Netanyahu than to America, so they wouldn't do it. | ||
| They wouldn't arrest him. | ||
| And you know the same thing would happen in America. | ||
| If Donald Trump ordered Secret Service to arrest Netanyahu, they'd probably arrest Trump instead. | ||
| Like, do you, like, what is going on? | ||
| And you've got senators and congressmen telling the rank and file military to disobey orders. | ||
| You've got Muslims in Dearborn, Michigan mocking the Christians that are being beaten up and spit in their face with the cops right there saying we control the police as they abuse the peaceful protesters. | ||
| In Chicago and LA and Seattle and Portland, you've got rampant criminality and Tifa and anti-ICE protesters physically attacking ICE every chance they get. | ||
| And the mayor's out there going, yeah, too bad. | ||
| What's Trump going to do? | ||
| Arrest me? | ||
| Governor Pritzker, what's he going to do? | ||
| Arrest me? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I dare him. | |
| You know, eventually you're going to have to deal with this. | ||
| Eventually, Trump is going to have to deal with this. | ||
| The earlier you deal with it, the easier it will be to deal with. | ||
| If Trump doesn't deal with it, we're going to have to. | ||
| And it's going to be way worse down the line. | ||
| What are we doing? | ||
| You want to see how bad it gets? | ||
| North Carolina, a major city in North Carolina, Charlotte, has 900,000 people in it. | ||
| 150,000 of them are foreign-born. | ||
| And I'm not even sure if that's including illegal aliens. | ||
| One-sixth of an American city is people by non-Americans. | ||
| How do you think it's going to go when they try to carry out arrests there for illegal immigrants? | ||
| It's going just about how you would expect. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 19. | ||
| This is like a cartoon howl. | ||
| This illegal immigrant. | ||
| And I just want you to, like, this is actually funny to me because of how easy it is to not be subject to arrest as an illegal immigrant. | ||
| If you're an illegal immigrant listening to me right now, go home. | ||
| Go back to your country. | ||
| You've got two options. | ||
| If you go back to your country right now, first of all, the government will give you $1,000. | ||
| They'll fly you back to your home country. | ||
| And then you can come right back over with a valid visa anytime you want. | ||
| Or you can resist the lawful orders. | ||
| You can fight to stay here illegally. | ||
| You can be arrested, thrown into a detention center, shipped back home country or a third country that you don't even know about, and never be allowed to step foot in America again. | ||
| Why would you make that second choice? | ||
| Why would you choose the second option ever? | ||
| So as we watch this video, just remember, the person that you're seeing squeal like a pig has nobody to blame but herself. | ||
| She made the choice to come here. | ||
| She made the choice to stay here. | ||
| She made the choice not to go home when she had the opportunity. | ||
| And now she wants to act like a victim because we have to go pick her up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch, morning on the farm. | |
| The rooster crowing. | ||
| It's like, shut up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Shut up. | |
| You're going home now. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 20 here. | ||
| This is in a church in North Carolina where, once again, we're observing the way that the Christian community is being manipulated and that citizens are just, I mean, they're just so brainwashed and retarded. | ||
| They really think they're doing something good here. | ||
| And there's like dozens of them. | ||
| And again, they only are doing this because they don't think there's a risk. | ||
| The same with Antifa. | ||
| It's the same with the illegal immigrants. | ||
| Same with the Muslims. | ||
| These are not groups that you can reason out of their actions. | ||
| The only thing you can do in these situations is punish them like children. | ||
| And most of these people are able to sort of convince themselves that what they're doing, like they really think they're like Harry Potter fighting Voldemort. | ||
| And they're able to do that because they're not actually doing anything. | ||
| They're able to convince themselves that they're like these heroes standing up against this big, bad power structure, but nobody's coming for them. | ||
| Nobody's fighting them. | ||
| Nobody's trying to stop them. | ||
| So this is absolutely 100% the responsibility of the government to literally, like what you're about to see, what should happen in this video is the doors to this church should be kicked open simultaneously, all of them, and a flood of agents should run in, and everybody in the church should be arrested for sedition and put in jail. | ||
| They're not only not doing that, they're making this open. | ||
| Now, if the government doesn't do it, it is going to be up to us. | ||
| And it would be so easy, and I don't know why people don't do this, to disrupt these meetings. | ||
| Search, go on Google, search simple sabotage CIA. | ||
| Seriously, search simple sabotage CIA. | ||
| There is a literal manual about how to disrupt actions like this. | ||
| Not violently, not by committing crime, but by getting involved and then causing trouble. | ||
| We really, really, really need that right now. | ||
| Because this is what they're doing in North Carolina. | ||
| One sixth of Charlotte is foreign-born. | ||
| And here's what they're doing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, I'm in Charlotte, North Carolina. | |
| I have to talk very quietly because I'm in a church, but check this out. | ||
| Yeah, so we'll go back. | ||
| And then we'll have the single chapter in your ship. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we're asking you, please post the videos. | |
| This is not a church service. | ||
| This is a training being run by Siembra, North Carolina. | ||
| It's called Safe to Work, Safe to School. | ||
| All those people are here because they do not want Donald Trump's mass arms federal agents on the streets of Charlotte. | ||
| They watched what happened in L.A. | ||
| They watched what happened in Chicago. | ||
| And they're all here to be trained about how to get their neighbors and their friends and their coworkers safely to work and safely to school to push back on the Trump administration on what they are doing. | ||
| It's a Monday night. | ||
| We are at the Dilworth United Methodist Church in Charlotte, and the turnout is incredible. | ||
| I'm going to show you again. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| Planning to disrupt ICE. | ||
| Safe to work, safe to school. | ||
| They're illegal immigrants. | ||
| They have to go home. | ||
| By the way, 21,000 students were absent today because they're illegal. | ||
| 21,000 students in a single school district are illegal. | ||
| Meaning the citizens of Charlotte, North Carolina are paying for 21,000 people. | ||
| That's 15% of the entire enrollment of the school district are legal aliens. | ||
| 15% of the students did not show up when Border Patrol started activating in North Carolina. | ||
| And look at what's happening. | ||
| Clip 28. | ||
| The Impede caravans are out early this morning. | ||
| Let's go to that. | ||
| Clip 28 here. | ||
| These are the people, you know, interrupting the ICE agents. | ||
| Again, what are we doing? | ||
| Why do we keep sending out, you know, four or five agents to try to arrest people, knowing that a crowd is going to show up? | ||
| And then why is the crowd allowed to maintain this without paying for it? | ||
| Let's go to some actually are paying for it now. | ||
| We can go to the video of they actually followed one of these people home. | ||
| And it's just, it's so typical that you have these people in these SUVs, clip 25, impeding the ICE agents and then just going home and parking in their little suburban driveway. | ||
| Let's pull the audio up here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's breaking the window. | |
| He's got an assault rifle pointed at her. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Well, she committed a federal crime. | ||
| So this person was interfering with ICE and then just wanted to go home. | ||
| Can you hear them yelling? | ||
| Put the windows down. | ||
| Just wanted to go home to her little condo or her fancy little white neighborhood and her little mid-size SUV. | ||
| Probably works from home. | ||
| She's a work-from-home speech therapist. | ||
| There he's breaking the window. | ||
| Like these absolute morons. | ||
| Okay, I'll unlock it then. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, you're going to jail, dumbass. | |
| You listen to the left and they convinced you to break a federal law for people that hate you. | ||
| Illegal immigrants that are abusing you and crowding out your children in school. | ||
| Sorry, you listened to the liars, but you're going to jail now, you absolute traitor to this country. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever. | |
| The fights will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RioAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. | ||
| Go to AlexJonesApp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, our ultramethylene blue is the best medical grade there is. | ||
| It's so good for your body. | ||
| We have nothing but rate reviews. | ||
| It is so crazy good. | ||
| But even if you buy it and don't like it, which we've had out of like 500 people I've given it to, three didn't have any effect. | ||
| Every person on air I've given it to absolutely loves it. | ||
| And it's so good for you. | ||
| Super energy within 30 minutes, no letdown. | ||
| You even sleep better on it. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| We have the best at theallshowstore.com. | ||
| And we have all the other great products. | ||
| I know Irish CMOS doesn't sound sexy or shilogy, doesn't it? | ||
| Bovine colostrum, whatever's the best, whatever's the highest rated, whatever absolutely delivers. | ||
| That's what we sell. | ||
| So take action now. | ||
| The widest selection of Patriot apparel, a lot of limited shirts, ball caps, t-shirts, hoodies, sweaters are also there at thealexhouse.com. | ||
| And even if the globalists shut down InfoWars, which they got a state receiver trying to do right now, we're fighting in court. | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| We got the Alex Shones Network that's owned by Big Lee that I don't own. | ||
| And the Alex Showstore.com that I don't own. | ||
| I'll just be the news director there. | ||
| They can't shut that down. | ||
| So you're keeping us on air at the same time, getting incredible products. | ||
| Folks, you are missing out. | ||
| I'm not a hype man. | ||
| They say the best salesmen sell good products. | ||
| Well, I sell the best. | ||
| Go to thealexsonstore.com right now because we have a sale running from now, Tuesday, November 18th, when I'm saying this live on air, until Monday, November 24th at midnight. | ||
| Every order on top of all the other discounts that are there gets $10 at checkout. | ||
| Just at checkout, when you hit checkout, $10 comes off. | ||
| And that means if you're buying a ball cap or a t-shirt or a $20 bottle of probiotic, that's excellent. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| For the next week only, add any of our amazing products to your cart and you will get an additional 10% automatically applied at checkout. | ||
| Best-selling products, ultramethylene blue, cleanest, strongest, medical grade, formula, bovine colostrum, the best. | ||
| 2,000 milligram per scoop. | ||
| Don't know about it? | ||
| You should look into it. | ||
| We got the best. | ||
| Ultimate Seamos. | ||
| Don't know about it. | ||
| Look into it. | ||
| We have the best. | ||
| It's like 40 milligrams per serving of two gummies or the capsules. | ||
| That's like a giant bowl of Iris C Moss. | ||
| Talk about you think Spinach is good for Pope Pie. | ||
| Well, this is like Spinach to the infinity. | ||
| Ultimate Life Force, Spike Protein, Cardiovascular Detox. | ||
| Incredible. | ||
| Everybody should be taking that. | ||
| It's all there. | ||
| Shilogy, capsules, all there. | ||
| And if you're a VIP, you sign up $30 a month, you instantly get $40 per store. | ||
| Special deals, special offers special sales. | ||
| So if you buy anything on the store, become a VIP. | ||
| And if you're worried about stuff selling out, which stuff sometimes sells out for like six months, one time sold out of the Irish Seamos for six months, because we have the highest standards of heartache ingredients, you sign up for auto ship, they hold it back for you, and you get 50% off in the future order. | ||
| You can cancel anytime. | ||
| So it's not much of a commitment when you become a VIP or a subscriber if you can cancel anytime. | ||
| You just get all the benefits. | ||
| But we know it's so good when you get it, you'll reorder. | ||
| We have an 80-plus percent reorder on the methylene blue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome to TheAlexJonesStore.com, the home of real solutions. | |
| Fuel your day with ultimate burn and ultramethylene blue. | ||
| Replenish and recharge with ultimate sea moss or delicious shilajit gummies. | ||
| Stay sharp, stay stylish with our t-shirts and sweatshirts. | ||
| Perfect for any season. | ||
| Don't wait. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tap into real gear and real supplements at thealexjonesstore.com. | |
| Power up today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever. | |
| The fight will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RealAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. |
Export Selection