Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Infowars. | |
| Tomorrow's news today. | ||
| Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the war room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| What a show. | ||
| What a show we have for you today, folks. | ||
| The news is off the charts. | ||
| The videos are powerful. | ||
| Josh Hammer's making a fool out of himself, and we're going to help. | ||
| We're going to help. | ||
| We got a lot of controversial things to cover today, folks. | ||
| You're not going to want to miss this episode, and I'm going to open up the phone lines for your calls probably in the last hour, maybe before. | ||
| But like I said, a lot of videos to get to. | ||
| I could fill up this whole first hour just with videos from JD Vance and his appearance at Ole Miss yesterday. | ||
| I'm not going to do that, but I could. | ||
| But I could. | ||
| It would be a very entertaining hour. | ||
| But I'll be judicious. | ||
| I'll have to choose just the most powerful clips. | ||
| But stay with us because we got a lot to get into. | ||
| Let's begin today as we do every day with our Daily Dispatch. | ||
| Near this, folks, your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 30th of October, 2025. | ||
| Today is the 30th of October, which means tomorrow's Halloween. | ||
| Day after that, November 1st. | ||
| The deadline. | ||
| Snap benefits update. | ||
| This is the headline in Newsweek. | ||
| Emergency declared as judge considers Trump funding move. | ||
| New York Governor Kathy Hochel has declared a state of emergency Thursday after federal funding shortfalls threatened supplemental neutral assistant program snap for millions of residents. | ||
| Hochel posted on X, the Trump administration would rather starve children and families than lift a finger to help them put food on the table. | ||
| I'm declaring a state of emergency to use every tool we have to help the 3 million New Yorkers losing food assistance because of the GOP shutdown. | ||
| So yes, folks, it is a state of emergency. | ||
| Not, I would say, not because the SNAP benefits are being withdrawn, but because 40% of our country is indigent. | ||
| That is, in fact, the emergency. | ||
| I think we need a national emergency to eliminate SNAP entirely forever. | ||
| But that's just me. | ||
| We'll get more into that later. | ||
| Meanwhile, Trump announces U.S. will resume nuclear weapon testing after China became defiant on denuclearization. | ||
| On Wednesday evening, President Trump announced the United States will resume nuclear weapons testing. | ||
| Currently, the U.S. is banned from conducting all but underground nuclear weapons testing under the 1963 Limited Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. | ||
| A 1996 comprehensive nuclear test ban treaty would also ban underground testing, although it's not entered into force. | ||
| China has recently become belligerent on the topic of denuclearization. | ||
| Trump's statement comes just hours before he's set to meet with the country's leader, Xi Jinping. | ||
| So this was sort of a random, unexpected move from Trump. | ||
| And a lot of people are trying to figure out whether it's even legal or not for us to restart the nuclear testing program. | ||
| Clearly, I think this was a very sort of overt sign and signal to China ahead of their meeting. | ||
| But the meeting went well. | ||
| Trump had a, quote, amazing meeting of great success with the Chinese leader. | ||
| On Thursday, President Donald Trump met with Chinese leader Xi Jinping in South Korea, where the two discussed trade and commerce. | ||
| Trump told reporters that they both have come to an agreement on almost everything, and he was able to make a number of key deals. | ||
| That's how it's being reported. | ||
| I weirdly have a source kind of close to the situation. | ||
| He's actually in contact with some of the Chinese delegation, and they're not very impressed by Trump or his team. | ||
| Let's just say that. | ||
| I'll get more into that later as well. | ||
| Meanwhile, key details emerge in Louvre Jewel Heist as five more are arrested, bringing the total number of arrested suspects to seven, but still not a single of the gems or jewels have been found. | ||
| $100 million still out there somewhere. | ||
| The dragnet tightened around the Louvre on Thursday. | ||
| Five more people were seized in the Crown Jewels heist, including a suspect tied by DNA. | ||
| The Paris prosecutor said, widening the sweep across the Capitol and its suburbs. | ||
| Authorities said three of the four alleged members of the Commando team as French media have done the robbers are now in custody. | ||
| That's good to see. | ||
| Hopefully, they'll return the crown jewels and France will kick them all out of their country. | ||
| But a man can dream. | ||
| Finally, Senate GOP and Democrats working on shutdown off-ramp this week, with the government shutdown firmly in its fourth week and SNAP beneficiaries threatening cannibalism. | ||
| See below. | ||
| Senate Republicans and Democrats are working behind the scenes on a proposal to reopen the government next week with censurous Democrats arguing behind the scenes that their party has successfully highlighted soaring health care costs. | ||
| And again, we'll get into this probably right off the bat. | ||
| We'll talk about what's happening with the shutdown, who's to blame for it, why it's the Democrats' fault, as always, and why Democrats, their constituents, are actually realizing this and turning on them because they really are desperate, and every move they make just digs the hole even deeper for them. | ||
| That's your daily dispatch brought to you, of course, by thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the warroominfowars.com. | ||
| Band.video. | ||
| Hope you're following us on X at InfoWars, at RealAlex Jones, at AJN Live. | ||
| Get the Alex Jones app. | ||
| Somebody today in the office was saying, I hope you're going to bring the sanity today. | ||
| Things have been a little off the rails today. | ||
| My response to that, don't count on it. | ||
| We got a lot of stuff to talk about, and it's all insane. | ||
| It's all completely insane. | ||
| I'm, in fact, bringing and hopefully upping the insanity as we get into all of the things going on around the world. | ||
| We'll start with, let's start with J.D. Vance because J.D. Vance did a turning point USA appearance yesterday where he, in the mode of Charlie Kirk, took questions from the audience. | ||
| Many of the questions were the same topics that Charlie was being asked towards the end of his life. | ||
| Questions about Israel, questions about immigration. | ||
| And J.D. Vance took them all, didn't insult any of them, didn't call any of them names, respectfully responded to every question with a reasonable and, as far as I can tell, truthful answer, which is really spectacular. | ||
| And I know about the suspicions of J.D. Vance. | ||
| I too am not entirely comfortable with the path that he took to prominence. | ||
| Seemed a little bit, well, it seemed like a well-greased path, we could say. | ||
| Things were set up for him a little bit in a way that, you know, I think we all know. | ||
| I think we all, if you don't know, basically, if you track back J.D. Vance's history, he got a lot of help from Peter Thiel early on. | ||
| That help with Peter Thiel continued until basically he was set up to become the vice president. | ||
| And that would hint or perhaps might be evidence that he's in the pocket of somebody like Peter Thiel. | ||
| So I'm suspicious of that as well, and I don't discredit those claims. | ||
| However, I can't think of a single thing I haven't liked about him since he became vice president. | ||
| I can't think of a single thing in the last 10 months that I can point to as a disappointment from J.D. Vance. | ||
| And it's not only that he says the right things, he's sometimes the only person saying those things. | ||
| In the case of the young Republicans and the faux outrage about the group chat leak, J.D. Vance was like the only prominent Republican to come out immediately and forcefully saying, we're not falling for this. | ||
| We're not going to condemn our own side. | ||
| Let's move on. | ||
| Nobody else did, and he didn't have to do that. | ||
| So I like J.D. Vance. | ||
| I like him. | ||
| And the more I know about him, the more I like him. | ||
| And he seems very honest. | ||
| He seems very upfront. | ||
| And he answers these questions very well. | ||
| Very well. | ||
| Let's go. | ||
| I guess we'll start with clip number five here. | ||
| I have like literally 20 clips of Vance from last night. | ||
| So we can't go to all of them, but let's start with one of the more, you know, viral ones. | ||
| Clip number five. | ||
| Here is J.D. Vance being asked about Israel and the Trump administration's relationship to that country. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Israel, sometimes they have similar interests to the United States, and we're going to work with them in that case. | ||
| Sometimes they don't have similar interests to the United States. | ||
| In this example, the most recent Gaza peace plan that all of us have been working on very hard for the past few weeks, the president of the United States could only get that peace deal done by actually being willing to apply leverage to the state of Israel. | ||
| So when people say that Israel is somehow manipulating or controlling the president of the United States, they're not controlling this president of the United States, which is one of the reasons why we're able to have some of the success that we've had in the Middle East. | ||
| Now, you ask about, you know, sort of Jews disagreeing with Christians on certain religious ideas. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| It's one of the realities is that Jews do not believe that Jesus Christ is the Messiah. | ||
| Obviously, Christians do believe that. | ||
| There are some significant theological disagreements between Christians and Jews. | ||
| My attitude is: let's have those conversations. | ||
| Let's have those disagreements when we have them. | ||
| But if there are shared areas of interest, we ought to be willing to do that too. | ||
| For example, I really care about one thing I really, really care about is the preservation of the church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. | ||
| Christians believe that that is the site where Jesus Christ was crucified and also that his tomb is right there as well. | ||
| My attitude is if we can work with our friends in Israel to make sure that Christians have safe access to that site, that's an obvious area of common interest. | ||
| I am fine with that. | ||
| What I'm not okay with is any country coming before the interests of American citizens. | ||
| And it is important for all of us, assuming we're American citizens, to put the interest of our own country first. | ||
| That's what we're going to do. | ||
| That's what we try to do every single day. | ||
| I promise you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| So, again, a very good answer. | ||
| And to go in reverse order, sort of, the last thing he said, I got to admit, I wasn't the biggest fan of. | ||
| So, J.D. Vance goes to Israel. | ||
| Of course, he does the Wailing Wall photo op. | ||
| That is a requirement, I guess. | ||
| And in addition to that, he goes to the Church of the Holy Sepulchre. | ||
| This is where Jesus' body laid and where there are miracles every Easter. | ||
| You should look into the miracle of holy fire. | ||
| It's really an incredible thing that people capture on video every single year. | ||
| It's a holy, it's the holiest of holy sites in Christianity. | ||
| And I love that. | ||
| I love seeing him go and paying respects to Christian heritage. | ||
| And he can go to the Wailing Wall if he has to, but you should at least go to some Christian sites at the same time. | ||
| After all, the Wailing Wall is not just not a Christian site. | ||
| It is an anti-Christian site. | ||
| People don't know this. | ||
| That wall is not the wall of the Second Temple. | ||
| That wall is a Roman wall. | ||
| They know this absolutely because in deconstructing and doing archaeology on the wall, they found Roman coins from long after the fall of the Second Temple under the lowest level of stones in the wall. | ||
| So before the wall was there, Romans were in control. | ||
| The temple was destroyed, and then the Romans built this wall. | ||
| The reason why they say it is a wall of the second temple is because Jesus prophesied that no stone would stand on top of another when the second temple was destroyed. | ||
| So if a wall still exists, that means Jesus was wrong. | ||
| So when you go to the whaling wall, you're not just paying homage to like Christian heritage. | ||
| You're actually submitting yourself to an anti-Christian ceremony where you're basically, you know, contributing to the lie that Jesus was wrong and that the temple never really fell in the way that he said it would. | ||
| So just to be clear, I like that he went to the sepulchre. | ||
| Then I see people like Nick Fuentes say, you know, don't be an idiot. | ||
| He's going to the sepulchre just to throw you a bone to make you think he's on your side, but this is just obvious gamesmanship. | ||
| It's just like, okay, we've gone too far. | ||
| Well, then, you know, here, throw him a bone to make them think that we're actually on their side. | ||
| I didn't think that was the case, but then to hear J.D. Vance say that the reason he went to the sepulchre was to celebrate how our relationship with Israel helps protect those sides. | ||
| And I'm like, okay, is that what it was about? | ||
| You went to the Holy Sepulchre to talk about how Israel is in charge of taking care of it. | ||
| I mean, sure, for the last 70, 80 years or so, but for the 2000 previous to that, it was okay, wasn't it? | ||
| Of course, it was actually destroyed at one point, but that's another story. | ||
| But going back to the beginning of his answer, J.D. Vance likes to signal to us. | ||
| We've been through this before, but J.D. Vance carefully picks his words. | ||
| He knows what he's insinuating, and he does it on purpose. | ||
| I genuinely believe that. | ||
| So what he's saying in a very political way, when somebody's asked, is Trump controlled by Israel? | ||
| He says, well, why don't you take a look at the Gaza deal? | ||
| You know, this was an instance where we had to use leverage against Israel. | ||
| The way he phrased it, you didn't quite get the idea. | ||
| What he's saying to us is Israel didn't want this. | ||
| If we were controlled, this peace deal wouldn't have happened. | ||
| We forced Israel into this by using our leverage. | ||
| Whatever that leverage is, I don't know, but clearly signaling to everybody. | ||
| And he doesn't say it outright. | ||
| There are political considerations, but he basically says, no, we're not controlled. | ||
| And then he says, in terms of American presidents, this one's not controlled by Israel. | ||
| What would the insinuation of that be? | ||
| That the other ones are. | ||
| These are signalies he's sending to us. | ||
| I believe that. | ||
| Because I also see people calling this out from the Zionist side and going, what does he mean when he says this president isn't controlled by Israel? | ||
| I guess he's saying the other ones are. | ||
| It's like, yes, yes, that is what he's saying. | ||
| And he's highlighting the difference between Trump and everybody else. | ||
| So yes, you figured it out. | ||
| Congratulations. | ||
| So that was just one. | ||
| And there were a lot of questions about Israel to Vance, but I think there's some others that are even more interesting. | ||
| Let's go to clip. | ||
| Oh, man, there's so many good ones. | ||
| Let's go to clip 11. | ||
| Since we're on the topic of Christianity, here is Vance talking about the place of Christianity in America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Say, I'm thrilled to hear you articulate Christian values on a stage like this and to remind us that things we take for granted and things we value so much have a Christian origin. | |
| So thank you for that. | ||
| I really mean that. | ||
| However, so much of liberalism, by the way, so much of the far left is a sort of, if you really pay attention to it, it's a kind of perverted version of Christianity. | ||
| Like there's nothing wrong, of course, with focusing on people who are disenfranchised, for example. | ||
| That's the focus of liberalism. | ||
| But if you completely separate it from any religious duty, any civic virtue, then that can actually become, for example, an inducement to lawlessness. | ||
| You can't just have compassion for the criminal. | ||
| You also have to have justice too, which is why I think that a properly rooted Christian moral order is such an important part of the future of our country. | ||
| But sorry, I interrupted you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| He's dead on. | ||
| He's exactly right. | ||
| Again, say what you want about Vance. | ||
| Question his backing or his real motives. | ||
| I think you're perfectly, I think it's a responsible thing to do that. | ||
| But he just, how can I not like somebody that sounds so much like me? | ||
| It's like we share a brain. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| And in fact, clip number eight here is the case that I've been making this entire administration. | ||
| Here's J.D. Vance making it saying basically this whole, oh, we can't do that because the left might do it to us when they're back in power. | ||
| It's complete nonsense. | ||
| They're going to do it anyway. | ||
| We have to do it first. | ||
| Here's J.D. Vance making that argument. | ||
| Clip number eight. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So here's something that I want conservatives. | ||
| I want every conservative to remember. | ||
| It's an important part of my entire political philosophy: is we cannot be afraid to do something because the left might do it in the future. | ||
| The left is already going to do it regardless of whether we do it. | ||
| That is the takeaway of the last 40 years. | ||
| And in particular, if you look at what we're doing, if Joe Biden wanted to deploy the National So, yeah, he's exactly right. | ||
| I mean, they're going to do it. | ||
| They already have done it. | ||
| That's maybe the craziest thing we talk about this is if it's speculative. | ||
| No, they already did. | ||
| And we'll get into that in just a little bit. | ||
| Called Arctic Frost. | ||
| And it's all being exposed right now. | ||
| And that's just the latest of the innumerable examples of leftist, absolute, abject tyranny that we've been subject to. | ||
| So at least J.D. Vance gets where we are in the, you know, in this feedback loop, the back and forth between Republicans and Democrats. | ||
| When they set the precedent, you must accept that precedent and rise to meet it. | ||
| That's the new rules of the game. | ||
| Vance seems to get that. | ||
| Vance also was asked about Palantir. | ||
| So he was given this directly, which again, kudos to TPUSA, kudos to J.D. Vance for taking these questions, for not censoring what people were allowed to ask at the microphone. | ||
| This is what the left and the Zionist right fear. | ||
| Everything right now going on with Josh Hammer and Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, it has nothing to do with being open to everybody. | ||
| It has to do with silencing dissent. | ||
| It has to do with silencing questions. | ||
| And we'll get into it later because the Dutch election that just occurred, the sort of extreme right, the far-right party that's currently in power, people thought we're just going to like even, you know, gain their, raise their power even more, get even more seats, be able to carry out even more deportations. | ||
| They were looking like they were going that direction and they should, except that the far-right party in the Netherlands, surprise, surprise, is deeply pro-Zionist. | ||
| And so they actually lost seats in the election because young people don't like that. | ||
| And so they don't vote for it. | ||
| So it's like all over the world, these right-wing parties, all over America and Europe, these right-wing parties are committing suicide, seriously disabling themselves for the sake of Israel because young people don't like it and don't want to vote for somebody who's going to sell their country out to this foreign genocidal state. | ||
| So you need to come to terms with that. | ||
| And the Republican Party is not going to survive if we tie ourselves resolutely to Israel. | ||
| It is a suicidal idea right now. | ||
| And it is just, you know, electoral genius to separate yourself from Israel because even people that don't like anything else about you feel strongly enough about this topic that they'll vote for you on that subject alone. | ||
| But all that is to say that the problem that the right wing has all over the world is that they have completely ignored, sidestepped, or silenced the objections of young people, and they still are doing it. | ||
| They have forever and they're still doing it. | ||
| And whether it's economic concerns that are completely valid from Gen Z and beyond, they're told by the boomers, shut up. | ||
| I bought a car for 3,000 bucks when I was your age. | ||
| Why can't you? | ||
| Because we're not in the same world, old man. | ||
| Like, you need to not discredit these claims. | ||
| These people are explaining what the world is really like for them, and you're telling them to shut up. | ||
| So, what do you think they're going to do? | ||
| You just say, okay, I'll keep voting for you. | ||
| Okay, I'll just shut up and suffer. | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Keep voting for you. | ||
| No, they're going to go to whoever tells them that they have an answer. | ||
| And if the only people suggesting an answer are the communists and socialists, who do you think they're going to go for? | ||
| So, whether it's Israel or whether it's economic concerns, stop telling people to shut up. | ||
| Stop silencing them. | ||
| Stop ignoring them. | ||
| Stop discrediting their very valid beliefs. | ||
| Listen to them. | ||
| Debate with them if you have to, if you disagree with them, or accept what they're saying as the truth and actually try to help them. | ||
| It's not all that complicated. | ||
| It's just we have a bunch of scumbag subversives trying to benefit Israel by destroying the Republican Party and by extension the United States. | ||
| These people are civilizational terrorists. | ||
| But let's move on. | ||
| JD Vance was asked about, did I already play the Palantir one? | ||
| Let's talk about Palantir. | ||
| Clip number nine here. | ||
| Vance drops a bombshell saying he does not support what Palantir is doing, but then he kind of defends them. | ||
| Let's watch the clip number nine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, Vice President Vance. | |
| How you doing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good. | |
| I have a question. | ||
| Do you condone large private corporations such as Palantir hoarding data caches on U.S. citizens? | ||
| No, I don't condone it. | ||
| And here's the thing. | ||
| So I get asked about Palantir a lot because there's this internet meme out there that somehow I am super in bed with Palantir. | ||
| And here's the thing that I'd say about this. | ||
| Palantir is a private company. | ||
| They sometimes do a useful service and sometimes they're going to do things that we don't like. | ||
| You should be demanding that your representatives do two things when it comes to Palantir or when it comes to any other technology company. | ||
| Number one, protecting your data. | ||
| What's going on with artificial intelligence is going to mean that there are massive inducements to steal your data, to harvest it, and to use it against you to sell digital advertisements. | ||
| That is not what I believe in, and I've been fighting against it, whether it's Palantir or any other technology company, literally before I ran for office. | ||
| When I ran for office, I was criticized by Republicans in my Republican Senate primary because I was talking then about Google and Facebook harvesting our data. | ||
| It's unacceptable. | ||
| I don't care who does it. | ||
| I don't want them to do it. | ||
| Number two, and this is also very important. | ||
| What's going on with artificial intelligence, we got to be worried about large-scale surveillance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay? | |
| Everything. | ||
| You asked about Palantir. | ||
| Do you know that every time you make a credit card transaction, the credit card companies are collecting data on how you spend your money? | ||
| Do you know that every time you linger over a link on the internet for more than a half second, the search engines are collecting data on you so that they can sell you advertisements? | ||
| One of the biggest questions for American policy over the next 10 years is how to ensure that you are a sovereign citizen and you cannot be a sovereign citizen if any private corporation or any government can steal something from you that belongs to you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Dead on. | ||
| He's exactly right. | ||
| How Lord of the Rings shaped J.D. Mance's politics. | ||
| A lot of my conservative worldview was influenced by Dogen. | ||
| You know, again. | ||
| Maybe I'm being played for a fool. | ||
| Maybe he's just seducing me when really it's all a lie. | ||
| I can't, I can't believe that if I don't have evidence for it. | ||
| And so far, again, he's really good on everything. | ||
| Let's go to clip number six here where he's asked about immigration, not just illegal immigration. | ||
| Here it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I understand your view on illegal immigration is it should be a top priority, strengthening our southern borders and fighting the massive drug trafficking that's taking place while securing jobs for the working class Americans. | |
| Also, deporting every single person who's invaded our country illegally, which I 100% agree on. | ||
| My question to you is, what is your view on legal immigration? | ||
| Personally, I have a girlfriend who's studying in America off a visa. | ||
| Our hope is eventually getting a green card. | ||
| So, what is your view on legal immigration? | ||
| Should we reduce it? | ||
| Also, what is your plan for a merit-based system? | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| Well, I appreciate the question. | ||
| And look, my honest view is that right now, America, thanks in part to the Biden border invasion, but also thanks in part to a lot of bad immigration policy. | ||
| Right now, we have let in too many immigrants into the United States of America. | ||
| That is just a fundamental reality. | ||
| So, he says basically he doesn't want legal immigration either. | ||
| Now, I think it was that response that inspired the next question, which is an immigrant herself asking J.D. Vance whether immigrants were sold a dream. | ||
| If now we're saying we don't want them, clip 17. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When you talk about too many immigrants here, what is when did you guys decide that number? | |
| Why did you sell us a dream? | ||
| You made us spend our youth, our wealth in this country and gave us a dream. | ||
| You don't owe us anything. | ||
| We have worked hard for it. | ||
| Then, how can you, as a vice president, stand there and say that we have too many of them now and we are going to take them out to people who are here rightfully so by paying the money that you guys asked us? | ||
| You gave us the path. | ||
| And now, how can you stop it and tell us we don't belong here anymore? | ||
| I can believe that the United States should lower its levels of immigration in the future while also respecting that there are people who have come here through immigration path, lawful immigration pathways that have contributed to the country. | ||
| But just because one person or 10 people or 100 people came in legally and contributed to the United States of America, does that mean that we're thereby committed to let in a million or 10 million or 100 million people a year in the future? | ||
| No, that's not right. | ||
| We cannot have, I'll go and finish. | ||
| We cannot have an immigration policy where what was good for the country 50 or 60 years ago binds the country inevitably for the future. | ||
| There's too many people who want to come to the United States of America. | ||
| And my job as vice president is not to look out for the interests of the whole world. | ||
| It's to look out for the people of the United States. | ||
| And he gets drowned out with cheers because, as always, the great signifier of the Trump campaign has always been nationalism versus globalism. | ||
| And what J.D. Vance just laid out right there is the distinction. | ||
| Are you the president for the whole world? | ||
| Is it your responsibility as vice president of the United States to look out for what's best for someone from Botswana or Mozambique or Guadalajara? | ||
| No, absolutely not. | ||
| Your job is to work for the American people. | ||
| And other people can benefit from our greatness, you know, with whatever's left over. | ||
| But you're supposed to prioritize America because that's your nation in the same way that as a father, you're supposed to prioritize your family because that's your family. | ||
| Doesn't mean that you hate other families, but you don't owe them shit. | ||
| That's the argument. | ||
| This is the divide. | ||
| And this is what I love about J.D. Vance is he understands that. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side. | ||
| We'll move on. | ||
| We'll talk about what's going on with Project Arctic Frost and the new revelations there. | ||
| I do want to remind you to go to the AlexJonesStore.com, check out the ultramethylene. | ||
| I took three droppers about two minutes before the show, and I am genuinely feeling it. | ||
| I've got like goosebumps. | ||
| You know, when you have like a ton of energy and you're just sort of vibrating, that's sort of how I am. | ||
| And I only did three. | ||
| You're supposed to take four. | ||
| I'm not even ready to take four of ultramethylene red. | ||
| Maybe you are. | ||
| Go to the alexjones store.com and get it today, 50% off if you sign up for the monthly delivery. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the war room. | ||
| What do we go to now? | ||
| Let's, you know, since J.D. Vance was taking a lot of questions about immigration, let's talk about immigration. | ||
| I do want to get into Arctic Frost, and there is plenty there to get to, but I got some really fantastic videos you could do before I go to that. | ||
| So let's start with Tom Homan. | ||
| Tom Homan, clip number 20, is stepping up the drive for deportations. | ||
| We have word that Stephen Miller is sort of cracking the whip. | ||
| Last week, basically, they looked at the deportation numbers, decided they weren't nearly high enough, and are doubling down their efforts to get enough people out in a short enough amount of time. | ||
| Again, I think the best way to do this is a combined method where you're going after the worst of the worst. | ||
| You're also offering free flights home and threatening people with like a couple years of hard labor if they refuse the offer. | ||
| I think that would be a very easy, simple, and effective method. | ||
| But here's Tom Homan on how they're stepping up deportations across the country. | ||
| In any way, accurate, Tom. | ||
| Look, we're all being aggressive. | ||
| I've said from day one, we're going to concentrate on public safety threats and national security threats. | ||
| But if you're in the country legally, you're not off the table. | ||
| We'll arrest you too. | ||
| So the numbers speaks for themselves, Laura. | ||
| It's the most secure border in history of this nation. | ||
| Over 23,000 missing kids have been found and saved. | ||
| And we have a record number of arrests and deportations. | ||
| We're going to hit 600,000 real soon, which will be a historic record. | ||
| And we're going to keep going. | ||
| As we get more agents signed, you're going to see arrests increase two, twice, three times. | ||
| You're going to see the numbers skyrocket. | ||
| It's good to hear because we got a lot of making up to do. | ||
| I mean, we've, you know, if you really want the actual numbers, we should be releasing the same amount that we were letting in if we just want to get back to zero. | ||
| If we just want to start at zero, where we were in 2020 when Biden rigged the election and took office, then we need to be deporting like at least 10,000 a day. | ||
| And we're nowhere near that number. | ||
| So let's get to move on. | ||
| Let's get going. | ||
| Now they are arresting the right people. | ||
| I think they're arresting a lot of the right people. | ||
| Here's Christy Noan. | ||
| This is clip number 21, head of DHS, talking about some of the dangerous drivers that they've taken off the streets because they were illegals with illegally obtained commercial driver's licenses that have become a menace on American highways because I think I've explained this before. | ||
| They figured out during COVID that truckers are like the last remaining well-paid manual labor job filled mostly by white men. | ||
| So then they engage in a systematic effort to replace all of those white men with Indians, basically. | ||
| Even if they didn't know how to drive or had never driven a truck before, they'd rather have them on the road than you. | ||
| Because if it's a white truck driver, that means it's a white man with a well-paying job and a pension and, you know, an ability to maintain his lifestyle and perhaps even participate in political action if the need calls for it, you know, like they did in Canada. | ||
| It was the Canadian truck protest that immediately after you saw this massive shift in the trucking industry where they brought in migrants to pilot their trucks. | ||
| Not a coincidence. | ||
| Clip 21, let's go. | ||
| Now, through our 287G partnership that we have with the state of Indiana, we have run an operation recently which has allowed to hundreds of arrests that has brought people in that are breaking our laws. | ||
| Through that partnership, 223 illegal aliens have been arrested and taken off of our roads. | ||
| Of those, 146 of them were drivers. | ||
| That includes 46 semi-truck drivers and another 82 of them that were either box trucks, buses, moving vans, vehicles such as that. | ||
| The CDLs that were issued to those individuals were issued from over a dozen different states. | ||
| Many of those individuals could have been licensed in a state somewhere and received their CDL in another state. | ||
| But overwhelmingly, these individuals have come from sanctuary states such as California and Illinois and New York. | ||
| If you are here driving on our streets illegally and our highways, you are endangering our citizens and your days are numbered. | ||
| I want to thank Secretary Sean Duffy from the Department of Transportation for all of his work too. | ||
| You've seen him focus on the effort to get these individuals off of our streets and I want to thank him for doing that and implementing new policies and regulations that will keep our citizens safe. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| Homeland Security cracks down on undocumented truck drivers, probably saving innumerable lives in the process. | ||
| We'll never even know how many people will continue to live because they're not being crushed by an 18-wheeler driven by some dude who doesn't even speak English and doesn't bother to read road signs. | ||
| Let's go to clip 29 here. | ||
| Again, this is, yeah, here. | ||
| These are the actual numbers. | ||
| 223 illegal aliens have been arrested, taken off the roads. | ||
| 146 were drivers, 46 semi-trucks, and 82 that were either box trucks, buses, moving vans, or vehicles such as that. | ||
| So again, good start. | ||
| Couple million more to go. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 29 here. | ||
| This was a video put out by the Department of Labor showing real positive developments in exactly what I was talking about last segment, addressing the very legitimate concerns of young people in this country who have seen their future stolen from them. | ||
| It's time to direct that ire, direct that anxiety where it belongs, the people who deliberately made it this way. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For generations, we've told Americans that if they work hard enough, they can achieve the American dream. | |
| But many young Americans have had this dream stolen from them. | ||
| Their jobs were replaced by foreign workers as politicians and bureaucrats allowed companies to abuse the H-1B visa. | ||
| But now, President Trump is delivering a new opportunity for young Americans through Project Firewall. | ||
| We're taking action to hold companies accountable for H-1B abuse and ensure they prioritize Americans in the hiring process, recapturing the American dream for the American people. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| That is the argument that people need to make. | ||
| And again, I don't understand why this is so hard to get Republicans on board with. | ||
| You've got all these young people out there. | ||
| Again, legitimate concerns. | ||
| They did everything right. | ||
| They did everything they were told to. | ||
| They went out. | ||
| They got a degree and a career that's supposed to pay well. | ||
| And then they're being forced to compete with 10 million Indians. | ||
| They never get a job. | ||
| They'll never own a house. | ||
| They'll never feel secure enough to get married or have children. | ||
| This is a major problem. | ||
| And instead of saying, shut up, pull yourself up by your bootstraps. | ||
| What are you, a socialist? | ||
| How about instead you say, why can't you buy a house? | ||
| Because they don't want you to buy a house. | ||
| Because BlackRock is systematically buying up neighborhoods so they can rent a house to you at the same price you could have bought it for, but they want you to rent forever. | ||
| Why can't you get a job? | ||
| Because they're bringing in scabs from around the world to undercut your wages. | ||
| All these problems are not random. | ||
| They're not an accident. | ||
| They're not because we've become more conservative or more nationalistic. | ||
| It's the exact opposite. | ||
| The reason that the economy doesn't work for young people is because it's been deliberately designed to not work for young people. | ||
| And everything that you've experienced in the last 20 years has been in fulfillment of that design. | ||
| The reason you'll never be able to afford a house is because they don't want you to afford a house because a house is ownership. | ||
| Property makes you free. | ||
| They want to enslave you. | ||
| They want you constantly paying in this paradigm of the company store so that you're never out of debt. | ||
| You're never able to pay off what you owe. | ||
| And basically everybody will be born with nothing and have to build up and not be able to pass anything on. | ||
| It's about destroying humanity as we know it and destroying intergenerational wealth because that's what allows people to build themselves up out of poverty. | ||
| If everybody has to start over at zero again, there's no point of even trying to get ahead. | ||
| So if you want these people who have, again, just absolutely valid and legitimate concerns about the state of the economy, you don't tell them to shut up. | ||
| You don't tell them to pull themselves up by your bootstraps. | ||
| And you certainly don't drive them to the socialists and communists by insulting them in that way. | ||
| You explain the actual process that has brought us to this point. | ||
| It's a process of globalization. | ||
| It's a process of replacement migration. | ||
| It's a process of financial abuse by the big banks who want everybody suffering under a truckload of debt that they'll never be able to escape from and always be working to pay off the thing that they were forced to borrow in the first place. | ||
| Explain that to people. | ||
| Come up with a plan or at least lay out the strategy of defeating that process and building a new process that actually works for the Americans and the young people will flock over to you. | ||
| Is this a complicated concept? | ||
| Apparently it is because the Republicans haven't understood this for the last 20 years and I don't have any hope that they're getting any closer now. | ||
| But again, on the topic of immigration, former media matters activist, current dim congressional candidate Kat Abug, indicted by feds for a violent ICE protest in Chicago suburb. | ||
| She made a video complaining about this and lying about it as well. | ||
| Let's go to clip number eight and I'll probably pull this out after a few seconds because she's just lying. | ||
| I'll tell you the truth on the other side. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| My name is Kat Abazale. | ||
| I'm running for Congress in the 9th District of Illinois and the Department of Justice is charging six people, including myself, with federal crimes for exercising our First Amendment rights near ICE's Broadview Processing Center. | ||
| This is a political prosecution. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| She was simply expressing her First Movement right near a processing center and they arrested her for that. | ||
| Oh my God, if only we had video of this, we could see what it was really all about. | ||
| I forgot to bring in the video. | ||
| We do have the video if we want to go find it in the archives. | ||
| It was probably a month ago. | ||
| We could find the date and we had the video then. | ||
| She's literally blocking an ICE vehicle and this was, I'm pretty sure it was literally one or two days after an insane leftist opened fire on an ICE facility and ended up killing some of the people they'd arrested. | ||
| She's out, there's the image of it, standing in front of a car, blocking a car while a crowd surrounds it. | ||
| Somebody in that crowd, by the way, had a gun and had been making threats to ICE. | ||
| And here this ICE vehicle is expected to stop just like an open target. | ||
| Yeah, here's the video. | ||
| I was expressing my First Amendment right vaguely close to the geographic proximity of an ICE facility and they're arresting me. | ||
| What? | ||
| Cut to her just standing in front of an ICE vehicle, trying to block it, trying to create a problem, putting the ICE agents in a very dangerous position and really making it dangerous for everybody there because ICE should not be obligated to sit there like sitting ducks when you have gunmen seeking their murder in the crowd. | ||
| You absolute moron. | ||
| She should go to jail. | ||
| I think she faces something like 10 years in prison because she's being charged with interfering with the lawful duties of a federal agent. | ||
| Good. | ||
| Send her away. | ||
| Hey, well, you know, stop breaking laws. | ||
| Hey, there's my advice. | ||
| There's my advice. | ||
| Don't want to get arrested. | ||
| Don't break the law. | ||
| Pretty damn simple, actually. | ||
| If you want to protest, go protest. | ||
| If you want to obstruct ICE officers, you're going to go to jail, lady. | ||
| I don't know if you believe the Democrats' lies, that what you were doing was somehow above reproach. | ||
| And sure, the laws are against it, but who cares? | ||
| We're on the right side of history. | ||
| I don't know what lies you bought into, lady, but somebody convinced you to break the law on their behalf, and now you're going to pay the price for it. | ||
| So everybody else should learn that lesson. | ||
| Everybody else needs to understand that you can't break the law with impunity under a Trump administration. | ||
| You can learn that lesson now, or you can learn it with 10 years in prison. | ||
| I suggest you learn it now. | ||
| I got one more thing about immigration. | ||
| It's clip 41 from the Gateway Pundit. | ||
| Social media uproar ensues as footage emerge showing Marxist Muslim candidate for Minneapolis mayor pledging loyalty to Somalia in a foreign language while waving his national flag. | ||
| Let's go to the video. | ||
| Let's watch what's his name? | ||
| Fatah Omar Fatah commit treason right out in the open. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
| Somalia. | ||
| Hira state. | ||
| Maw Isle. | ||
| Maw Island. | ||
| Early voting wai. | ||
| Hada ila November 4. | ||
| I need your vote. | ||
| I need you. | ||
| Hadan, Udkina. | ||
| Hello? | ||
| We're going to win. | ||
| Okay, so, I mean, it's just, do we not understand what's happening here? | ||
| The people of Minneapolis, if this guy wins, are about to be straight up under the authority of a foreigner. | ||
| You have now been conquered officially. | ||
| Somebody that does, you know, is speaking in a different language than you, waving another country's flag, is now going to have authority over you. | ||
| And that's not even to mention the way that he looks. | ||
| I'm trying to avoid that topic, but my God, it's hard. | ||
| I want to draw him. | ||
| I want to draw his face, but I would be arrested. | ||
| It would be a hate crime for me to draw his face. | ||
| How can this guy have so much support? | ||
| Oh, right. | ||
| Sorry, because they imported a city's worth of so-called refugees from the worst country in the world. | ||
| And now they get to decide who rules over Americans in Minneapolis. | ||
| And they're choosing somebody that isn't even speaking English in his campaign speeches. | ||
| What we just witnessed, in any time period of human history for 50,000 years, up until about 20 years ago, this not only would have been an excuse to immediately denaturalize and deport him, no questions asked, but to frankly go to war with him, anybody who supports him, and maybe the country of Somalia. | ||
| How dare you bring another country's flag and wave it as you run for a position in America? | ||
| And again, to speak a different language that only your fellow countrymen speak while you're running for the mayoral contest of a major American city. | ||
| We need control of our country again. | ||
| Americans need control of our country again. | ||
| And frankly, I mean, it's going to be a difficult thing to do because the problem is they've brought in so many millions of people who will vote for scumbags like this, scumbag foreigner traitors like this. | ||
| We're not going to be able to vote our way out of it. | ||
| How are you going to outvote a monolithic bloc constituency that's been deliberately plopped in your congressional district or in your city to vote for their own people to benefit themselves to represent their country? | ||
| How are you supposed to overcome that when all of these people have been granted citizenship by the wave of a pen because Barack Obama hates white people? | ||
| Like, what are we supposed to do? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, we need not just to increase the things happening in the deportation front, we need to massively accelerate and expand them as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| Now, Trump has set a 7,500 person limit on the number of refugees entering the U.S. per year. | ||
| The Trump administration is restricting the numbers of refugees admitted annually to the United States to 7,500, and they would mostly be white South Africans. | ||
| A dramatic drop announced Thursday and effectively suspends America's traditional role as a haven for those fleeing war and persecution or, you know, Mexico. | ||
| Our traditional role as the dumping ground of the third world refuse. | ||
| It's ending that long and storied tradition of being a welfare magnet for the incompetent around the world. | ||
| Gosh, what will we do without millions upon millions of government dependents coming here and signing up for benefits? | ||
| How will we survive? | ||
| Whatever could we do? | ||
| Again, good start. | ||
| It's a very good start. | ||
| Let's get into the, if we can move, if we can move on now from the immigration, which I think we should. | ||
| Let's get into not Arctic Frost. | ||
| We'll get into that next hour. | ||
| But this is, I mean, I guess this is in line with all of this, but apparently the deployment of military in American cities is increasing. | ||
| National Guard members train for civil unrest missions in U.S. cities. | ||
| The Pentagon has ordered thousands of specialized National Guard personnel to complete civil unrest mission training over the next several months, an indication that the Trump administration's effort to send uniformed military forces into urban centers, once reserved for extraordinary emergencies, could become the norm. | ||
| Well, the problem is the new normal is an emergency. | ||
| The emergency is that the traitorous Biden administration opened up our border for four years, and there are probably 50 to 60 million illegal immigrants in this country that refuse to leave. | ||
| That is an emergency. | ||
| It's almost like the emergency has become so huge and they're so desperate to normalize the emergency conditions that they don't recognize that we're in an emergency. | ||
| The emergency is so overwhelming that they can't even see it. | ||
| The fact that there are 40 to 50 to 60 to 100, I mean, we don't even know how many millions of illegal immigrants are in this country, but we do know that when they're asked politely to leave, they'll fight the ICE officers and try to shoot them. | ||
| So that's an emergency, folks. | ||
| It's not just an emergency. | ||
| That's like a state of war. | ||
| That's an invasion that we're now having to deploy forces to contend with. | ||
| You didn't want that to happen. | ||
| You shouldn't have sent in the invasion force, you dummies. | ||
| I don't like this either. | ||
| I don't want this either. | ||
| I do worry that Trump is not going far enough, that he's not handling this aggressively enough, that this is going to be a weapon system that will be deployed against the American people if Trump and his administration don't do what's necessary in the next couple of months, to be honest with you. | ||
| We don't have that long. | ||
| And if the Democrats are able to get back in power, then we are just A, pissing them off, B, building a weapon system for them. | ||
| So, if we deploy the weapon system and we defeat them and demoralize and disenfranchise them to the point that they can't gain power anymore, then fantastic. | ||
| I'm all for it. | ||
| But that requires complete commitment, not the half-assed gladhanding that we've seen so far from the Trump administration. | ||
| The Defense Department's newly established quick reaction force within the National Guard must be trained, equipped with riot control gear and ready for deployment by January 1st, according to internal documents reviewed by the Washington Post. | ||
| The 200 troops will be drawn from the National Guard personnel, whose primary focus is responding to disasters like nuclear accidents and terrorist attacks, the documents said. | ||
| An existing but separate but similar structure, the National Guard Reaction Force, is expected to complete civil unrest training and be fully operational by April 1st. | ||
| The total size of the force will be 23,500 troops across all 50 states and three territories, excluding the District of Columbia, documents say. | ||
| So, I mean, if you're going to do this, I think that might even be a little small. | ||
| I mean, we have tens of thousands, if not hundreds of thousands of soldiers at bases all over the world, doing absolutely nothing for the American people or benefiting American interest in any way. | ||
| Meanwhile, we've got Portland police actually working against ICE and helping out Antifa as they continue their siege there. | ||
| We have this from post-millennial, surround the White House. | ||
| Far left group, refuse fascism, plan siege of D.C. government buildings. | ||
| Again, I'm not particularly worried about this, but if we are to subject them to the same standard we were subjected to, they are all writing their own death warrant here. | ||
| They're all writing their own subscription to the Prison Monthly magazine, right? | ||
| These people need to be sent to jail if we're to have any consistency in law and order around here. | ||
| A coalition of far-left activists is planning an insurrection in Washington, D.C. on November 5th, calling for millions of Americans to surround federal buildings and refuse to disperse until President Trump is removed from power. | ||
| Oh, interesting. | ||
| So not a protest then. | ||
| So not a protest, not a laying out of grievances, petition of redress of grievances, no such thing. | ||
| This is, I believe the dictionary definition would be terrorism. | ||
| That's what that would be. | ||
| You're going to surround federal buildings and demand political action like the country's your hostage. | ||
| Hey, here's the good news. | ||
| We don't have to wait. | ||
| They're apparently announcing this and planning it. | ||
| Why don't we do something about that? | ||
| Why don't we not wait until it actually happens and it all gets chaotic and insane? | ||
| Why don't you pay a visit to these people just like you did with Jeremy Brown? | ||
| Why don't you go knock on their doors and let them know what they're engaged in so they can choose not to make this mistake? | ||
| How about we act like a sovereign country that's actually concerned about the insurrectionist forces that are currently plotting their strategic deployment as we speak and in the open? | ||
| How about we use all of the power that all of us regular people have worked endlessly to deliver to the Republicans? | ||
| How about they use that power to secure our country from these insane scumbags? | ||
| How about we do that for once? | ||
| Can we do that, please? | ||
| For the love of God? | ||
| I know you spent the last 12 years spying on InfoWars. | ||
| I know they've spent the last several decades systematically deploying intelligence assets against conservative activists. | ||
| Can we get just like a modicum of that from our side? | ||
| Can we get just like the bare minimum? | ||
| While we at Infowars do nothing but tell the truth, do nothing but lead peaceful marches and make hilarious memes, we're the ones that have been subjected to surveillance and oppression for the last several decades, while these people are openly planning a literal insurrection and nothing is being done for them. | ||
| I don't want peaceful protesters of the left subject to the same shit we've been subjected to, but I do want the actual violent scumbags that are running this crap to be hauled away to prison for the rest of their lives. | ||
| Is that too much to ask? | ||
| Is it because I got a lot more to ask, but that would be the bare minimum. | ||
| I think that would be the bare minimum we could achieve to actually sustain our control in this country. | ||
| Somebody the other day was saying, you know, somebody said, you know, it's like we don't control the White House. | ||
| And somebody else said, well, if Republicans have the Senate, the Congress, and the White House, and they're not in control, who is? | ||
| And it's like, well, great question. | ||
| Really great question. | ||
| Maybe we'll answer that in the next hour. | ||
| Stay tuned. | ||
| You know, there's something funny that it's a hypocrisy that people don't even recognize, but it is an obvious one. | ||
| And that's this weird switch that's occurred between your traditional conspiracy theorists like myself and the left and their attempts to theorize. | ||
| And it's causing a bit of confusion, I think. | ||
| We're about to go to a video of Jake Tapper just being frankly humiliated by Tim Dillon over the topic of Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
| Is it Chris Cuomo? | ||
| I don't care. | ||
| Okay, I'm sorry. | ||
| It's our crew. | ||
| Yes, Chris Cuomo, not Jake Tapper. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Whatever globalist meathead talking head is pretending to be stupid about things so he doesn't have to tell the truth. | ||
| Asked Tim Dylan about Jeffrey Epstein and gets a very funny answer in response. | ||
| But I was just sitting here thinking about some of the conspiracy theories that have been floated in the last few years. | ||
| Now, on the right wing, we have conspiracy theories like Jeffrey Epstein is a Mossad agent. | ||
| Duh. | ||
| Is that even a conspiracy theory? | ||
| It's confirmed, more or less, by anybody who actually does the research. | ||
| Not really more, not a conspiracy theory, more of an established fact, right? | ||
| And we have a few others, I guess you could say, but it's nothing compared to Russia collusion and oh my God, you know, Pete Hegseth has a cross tattoo. | ||
| That means he's a Nazi. | ||
| I mean, the conspiracy theorizing from the left has been absurd. | ||
| I don't, I think it might be because they don't understand how conspiracy theories come about. | ||
| We come up with conspiracy theories, if that's what you want to call them, by doing research and determining that the real story is not the official story. | ||
| And then we express what we believe to be true. | ||
| They don't understand that or care about that or have the mental capability to understand that. | ||
| So they just come up with nonsense and throw it at the wall and see if it sticks. | ||
| They think that's what we do. | ||
| Here's Tim Dillon humiliating some guy. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Why is it that people on the fringe right seem to engage in conspiracies more? | ||
| Is it a coincidence that Benny Johnson and Charlie Kirk are more interested in the Epstein files? | ||
| Is it a coincidence that Rogan believes was talking so much about Epstein killing himself versus being murdered? | ||
| Why do we hear more of that? | ||
| I think there's people on the fringe left, if you remember, and I listen, I think Epstein probably was murdered. | ||
| I mean, I don't think there's so many based on the idea that the cameras went out and the guards fell asleep and he had information on some of the most powerful people in the world. | ||
| And his best friend, Ghislaine Maxwell's father, the Seymour Hearst, wrote a book alleging that he was an agent of the Mossad and they had what clearly seems like a honeypot operation and that all of these politicians were on his jet. | ||
| It feels like, again, just from an outsider's point of view, he got a sweetheart deal for the first time he was accused and convicted of being inappropriate with a minor. | ||
| And I don't know the exact terminology. | ||
| He did a lot more than being inappropriate with a minor, but you have this intriguing, weird figure who's connected to all of these very powerful people and has an island where people are going to meet up with underage women and all of these people are coming out and testifying to that effect. | ||
| And then right before his trial, he dies. | ||
| I mean, Chris, let's be honest. | ||
| If we're talking about the mafia and we're talking about a guy that had information on all of these big, powerful people, then he gets whacked. | ||
| There's not a part of your brain. | ||
| And I'm, you know, Kirk or Johnson or Rogan or whoever, me or anybody who's looking at this and people on the left and the fringe left also has some conspiracies. | ||
| One of them was that Donald Trump was an agent of Russia. | ||
| And by the fringe left, I mean every media organization, including the one you used to work for, every day was Russia Gate. | ||
| So to me, it's like, don't you look at the Epstein thing and for a minute say to yourself, yes, it is possible that this guy who is involved in potentially blackmailing people, but certainly involved in human trafficking and connected to all these wealthy, powerful people gets whacked before he can say any of their names. | ||
| Yes, I think it's very curious. | ||
| Well, then you're a deranged conspiracy theorist, anti-Semite, sir. | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| I just, I got nothing to add to that. | ||
| Well done, Tim Dylan, off the top of his head, too. | ||
| You want to know really why we think he's dead? | ||
| I can give you a binder full of information. | ||
| But off the top of his head, that was great. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Second hour of the war room has begun. | ||
| You can support us by going to thealxjonesstore.com. | ||
| But it's not just supporting us, it's supporting yourself as well with the brand new and incredibly powerful ultramethylene red. | ||
| Get ultramethylene red right now for 50% off when you subscribe. | ||
| And for the next two days, all shirts and hats on the site are $19.99 with any purchase of methylene red. | ||
| So get your ultramethylene blue, pair it with the ultramethylene red, get yourself a t-shirt or a hat on top of it. | ||
| All of it's discounted. | ||
| Sign up for the auto ship and you're getting 50% off the ultramethylene. | ||
| Incredible deals, incredible products, incredible information supported by thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Now, I was, I promise you, going to move on to Arctic Frost. | ||
| Then something came up. | ||
| Something arose. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| And you can go to thealexjonesore.com slash Harrison to let them know who sent you. | ||
| Something came up. | ||
| The crew told me about a video I hadn't seen yet. | ||
| So I think we're going to have to start talking about Israel. | ||
| I think we're going to have to get into it because it has been an absolute disaster. | ||
| And I've ranted about this enough yesterday. | ||
| I did a whole Moonbase episode on this last night. | ||
| If you want to find that, you can go to rumble.com slash Moonbase Live or I don't know, search Moonbase Live. | ||
| And we did a show basically breaking down the Josh Hammer article from yesterday. | ||
| I'll get into it again today. | ||
| But just to give you a brief overview, essentially, there has been an ongoing effort. | ||
| And it actually goes back a lot longer than I've been saying recently because it really became apparent in 2024 when the outrageous behavior of the Israelis in bombing Gaza for years on end for no particular reason drove a lot of people away from that support for that particular country. | ||
| And the Democrats embraced this and really were not supporting Israel at all in 2024. | ||
| So the powerful Israel-first voices in America decided to back Trump completely. | ||
| That's when a bunch of the big tech people came over, a bunch of the big investment people like Bill Ackman decided to not be a Democrat like he was for the rest of his life and instead back Trump. | ||
| All of that was predicated on Israel. | ||
| And we have seen the effects of that. | ||
| And throughout his entire administration, as we've been laying out, there has been this silent, shadowy cold war going on where Israel is desperately trying to twist Trump's arm and get him into a war with Iran and get more for Israel and just treat America like the stick they swing around to bash their enemies with. | ||
| And Trump has been resisting this while continuing to play the game and thread the needle and walk that tightrope. | ||
| But it actually goes way far beyond 2024. | ||
| And something that we haven't talked about in a while, and probably a lot of people watching me right now probably weren't even in the movement all the way back then. | ||
| Not a criticism, but it's just true. | ||
| If you were involved in the internet spaces in 2015, 2016, you know that the Trump movement at the grassroots level was anti-Israel from the beginning. | ||
| And probably the most prominent, the most important space for memes and messaging and narratives was the Donald on Reddit. | ||
| It was Reddit slash R slash the Donald. | ||
| And it was a powerhouse of information, a powerhouse of MA culture. | ||
| And there was a very distinct changeover that occurred when it became obvious Trump was going to be the Republican candidate. | ||
| Because when it started, it was distinctly anti-Israel because to be anti-Israel fell perfectly in line with everything else Trump was talking about. | ||
| The wars overseas, the wars in the Middle East. | ||
| The big breakout moment, right, was him saying that George W. Bush got us into war in Iraq and we never should have been there because there were no weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| That was a lie. | ||
| When he said that during that first debate, I mean, that was unprecedented. | ||
| Nobody said that at that time. | ||
| And again, we forget how far we've come in 10 years. | ||
| 10 years ago, if you went back to 2015 in October 2015 and told people that like, yeah, the next president is going to blame the Iraq war on Bush for lying about weapons of mass destruction, you would have seemed like an insane person. | ||
| Nobody said that. | ||
| Donald Trump did. | ||
| Came out with this. | ||
| It was major. | ||
| It drew a lot of people onto his side. | ||
| And to be anti-Israel was part and parcel with that. | ||
| Then when it was discovered that he had a lot of momentum and was probably going to become the Republican candidate after all, there was a change. | ||
| Moderators were removed. | ||
| Others put in and suddenly it became pro-Israel. | ||
| Isn't that interesting how that works? | ||
| So, I mean, this has been an ongoing conflict. | ||
| This has been an ongoing, shadowy, cold civil war in the MAGA movement for as long as the MAGA movement has existed. | ||
| It was never an Israeli movement. | ||
| It was always an America-first movement that Zionists have always infiltrated and turned towards their own ends, or at least tried to. | ||
| They've succeeded some places, have failed in others. | ||
| Now, this is massively accelerated during his second administration, obviously, because of the war in Gaza, because of the huge swing of public opinion away from Israel. | ||
| And of course, the incredible amounts of money and time and energy that Israel has put into propagandizing the rest of us into going along with their takeover of the Republican Party. | ||
| So it's been going on for a while. | ||
| It's increasing, and it's gotten to a fever pitch that's frankly exhausting and annoying. | ||
| And all of this has sort of come to a head with the union, Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson. | ||
| They went, they did an interview together, and since that moment, it is the only thing anybody's talking about on Axe. | ||
| It is the only topic that anybody wants to talk about, and for pretty good reason. | ||
| Now, what is the problem with Nick Fuentes being interviewed by Tucker Carlson? | ||
| The problem is that he's convincing. | ||
| The problem is that he makes good arguments and that listening to him might sway people towards his belief system and away from the Zionist control of the Republican Party, and that Tucker Carlson has been really forced to go along with this. | ||
| And this is just what happens. | ||
| And you see it with literally everybody, okay? | ||
| Literally everyone. | ||
| Some are more willing to go farther than others. | ||
| Others are more compelled by their obligations or donations or whatever it is to not quite go so far. | ||
| But you saw it with Charlie Kirk. | ||
| You've seen it with Candace Owens. | ||
| You've seen it with Tucker Carlson. | ||
| You even, I mean, Nick Fuentes, the whole, you know, interview with Tucker Carlson was a description of how this occurs, right? | ||
| It was Nick Fuentez talking about being 18 years old, being in high school, listening to Mark Levin, listening to Michael Savage, being a sort of normie conservative, libertarian type person. | ||
| And by merely asking a question about Israel, he found he experienced massive, unrelenting, and completely unjustified backlash from the Israeli contingent on the right. | ||
| And so he goes, well, this is weird. | ||
| I guess I'll push back. | ||
| And then it becomes a feedback loop where they always escalate and you have to escalate to meet them until you're like a full-blown anti-Semite. | ||
| And it's just, this is the, you know, escalation ladder that everybody seems trapped in. | ||
| Charlie Kirk was the same way, but to a much, much lesser degree, right? | ||
| He was extremely pro-Israel, started to just barely temper that, you know, aspect of his persona. | ||
| And you saw, you've seen from the text messages and from all the articles that have been released, he was then subject to a full-fledged pressure campaign, blackmail campaign, and bribery campaign to get him back on the plantation. | ||
| Tucker Carlson, the same way, never anti-Israel to this day, sings the praises of Israel over any other country. | ||
| He says it's a favorite vacation spot. | ||
| Like he just loves it. | ||
| But he doesn't approve unquestioningly of their every decision. | ||
| Therefore, he is evil. | ||
| He must be excluded. | ||
| He must be expelled from the party. | ||
| That's the argument we keep hearing. | ||
| This is absurd. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| And now it's sort of happening at like national, in like national levels, where the insistence that we not question anything that Israel does. | ||
| And again, I don't need to go over this guy. | ||
| I went over it yesterday that the fact they chose Tucker Carlson as the subject of their ire is a strategic blunder because you can't look at Tucker Carlson and say, well, they're just trying to keep the hate out of the party. | ||
| Look, you know, you might say something's good, but if we want a political party into the future, we can't have crazies like Tucker Carlson out there making these crazy claims. | ||
| It's like he doesn't make any crazy claims. | ||
| He's very reasonable. | ||
| He's very loving. | ||
| He's very straightforward about what he believes. | ||
| So what a stupid person to try to kick out of the Republican Party. | ||
| And again, it's not because he's saying all this crazy stuff and everybody else is just trying to, well, we're just trying to get conservatism back. | ||
| And he's like, no, we must kill the Jews. | ||
| Like that's how they're portraying it. | ||
| But in reality, he had some very moderate, very tepid criticisms of the brutal and outrageous actions of the Israeli military. | ||
| But that very, you know, tepid response is enough for them to launch a full-fledged attack against him to deliberately try to divide MAGA on purpose to try to exclude those that don't unquestioningly love Israel. | ||
| All this is to say That this is the exact type of stuff that we're against has actually, at the end of it, our motivation, my motivation, has nothing to do with Israel, has nothing to do with Jews. | ||
| My motivation is protecting my country, our beliefs, our foundational belief system, Christianity, the First Amendment, and the sovereignty of the United States. | ||
| That's where I'm coming from. | ||
| And any threat to that is going to get my ire. | ||
| I don't care who you are, and I'm not going to shut up because of who you are. | ||
| And I won't target you because of who you are because I'm a principled person, unlike any of the people we're about to discuss. | ||
| But this is not just in the political sphere. | ||
| This stuff is really having a devastating impact on regular Americans, and it's only going to increase if we don't stand up and stop it right now. | ||
| And at the end of the day, the whole reason that this has become a giant firestorm conflict is because we haven't been able to talk about this this whole time. | ||
| Because for decades, anybody trying to tell the truth about Israel, tell the truth about AIPAC, tell the truth about the ADL, or Zionism as a philosophy has been destroyed. | ||
| And so you didn't have reasonable people bringing up objections. | ||
| You didn't have the type of conversations that we should have been having this whole time about what's best for us versus best for them. | ||
| Where do our priorities lie? | ||
| What are we prioritizing in this moment? | ||
| How do we go into the future with both countries being reasonable and independent? | ||
| That was never allowed to happen. | ||
| So the truth doesn't get destroyed because people censor it. | ||
| It just gets backed up, right? | ||
| It's like a flow, it's like a flowing river. | ||
| The truth is there. | ||
| It just flows. | ||
| It's got its own impetus, the truth. | ||
| And when you try to hold it back, you're not stopping the truth from getting out. | ||
| You're damming it up. | ||
| And eventually that dam is going to break. | ||
| It's best not to build the dam. | ||
| It's best to let the truth flow. | ||
| Let everybody have their say. | ||
| Do it in a loving fashion. | ||
| But when you dam up the truth for several decades, something's going to happen. | ||
| It's going to crack and the truth's going to come spilling out with a force much, much more significant than it would have if you just let it flow the entire time. | ||
| So, Adam the Angler at Adam the Great TV on X posts this: Here's the video of Texas DPS and Bell County Sheriff's Office showing up in my front door all because I make anti-Israel posts. | ||
| Is it free speech when Israel can just send your local cops to your door when you make posts they don't like? | ||
| Let's watch this video. | ||
| This is in Texas. | ||
| This is Texas DPS enforcing thought crime for a foreign state. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Let's go to the video, guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're here because of the comments you made online about the Jewish community. | |
| Are you still up? | ||
| No, I'm saying, are you having a freedom of speech, dude? | ||
| Yeah, no, we get that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I get that. | |
| We got to make sure that you're not. | ||
| Do you have a warrant? | ||
| No. | ||
| No, that's why we're. | ||
| You see that sign? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Sounds like no soliciting. | ||
| What you're doing is basically soliciting. | ||
| You understand that, right? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| It means you're not welcomed here. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Sail full on, please. | ||
| This is what they're doing, guys. | ||
| You make comments about the Jews online, they'll show up at your door. | ||
| This is what they do. | ||
| This is freedom of speech. | ||
| This is how much control Israel has over our country. | ||
| Look at this response. | ||
| For exercising my freedom of speech online. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| What a joke. | ||
| Can't wait to do some auditing of you boys. | ||
| Bye-bye. | ||
| Look at that. | ||
| Science is no soliciting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do they think they're fucking doing? | |
| They got no warrant. | ||
| Sign that says no soliciting does not give you a right to my curdlage. | ||
| Bye-bye. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Freedom of speech. | |
| Do we have the door? | ||
| Do we have the ring doorbell video? | ||
| Guys, let's grab the ring doorbell video because apparently it's on that video. | ||
| Do we have the audio for this? | ||
| Here's the police showing up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The dog. | |
| The rail on it. | ||
| Oh, there's a dog in there. | ||
| bulletproof vest by the way so i believe at according to the post i'm reading it at one minute and 40 seconds they they say why they are showing up at this guy's house This is incredibly creepy. | ||
| I mean, this guy handled himself well. | ||
| He said he did exactly what he was supposed to. | ||
| Do you have a warrant? | ||
| No, get off my property. | ||
| That's all that needs to be said. | ||
| But I'd want to know who ordered these guys to do this? | ||
| Under what law are they intimidating American citizens because of their posts online that, as far as I can tell, he didn't make any threats. | ||
| He didn't say he was going to do something. | ||
| He expressed dislike of Israel. | ||
| We're here because of the comments you made online about the Jews. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've got to make sure that you're not going to harm water. | |
| No. | ||
| That's why we're here. | ||
| That's not. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| That's not. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Other people say they hear, we're here because of the comments you made online about Israel. | ||
| I thought he said the Jews, but either way, that's what they're there for. | ||
| They showed up because of comments he made online. | ||
| Not threats. | ||
| Nothing illegal. | ||
| So why is the Texas DPS showing up at that man's door? | ||
| It doesn't matter they didn't arrest him. | ||
| That's intimidation. | ||
| That is a clear, stark warning to other people and to him in particular. | ||
| You don't say this type of stuff. | ||
| Who gave them the order? | ||
| And what do we charge him with? | ||
| They can't get away with this. | ||
| This is not. | ||
| This is not acceptable. | ||
| And we have to send a powerful message that this is not acceptable. | ||
| We have free speech in this country, but we are losing it. | ||
| And we're losing it to the Zionists. | ||
| They are the number one threat to free speech that exists right now. | ||
| So much more and beyond Anything else in the world? | ||
| How are Texas DPS officers being sent to knock on the door of an American citizen because of opinions that he expressed on X that weren't even enough to get his account suspended? | ||
| They weren't even enough to get him kicked off of X, which has a habit of kicking off people who get a bit loquacious about their dislike of Israel. | ||
| But apparently the comments he made weren't even enough to get him a ban or a suspension on X, yet somebody out there, some person out there, either in the local government here, the state government of Texas, or perhaps it came down from on high, somebody told them to go talk to this guy. | ||
| I'll tell you what. | ||
| First of all, we need to find out who gave that order because that is a direct violation of his freedom of speech. | ||
| Again, you don't have to get arrested. | ||
| If cops show up at your door, knock on your door fully loaded with bulletproof vests on and say, we're here because of comments you made on the internet, that is an attempt to intimidate and to restrict the First Amendment. | ||
| That is not legal. | ||
| These people have to be held to account. | ||
| Whoever gave the order, and I'd say whoever followed that order. | ||
| Now, if they'd said, hey, you made some threats, we want to make sure you're not serious about those, make sure you're not acting on that. | ||
| Hey, we think you're in contact with actual terrorists overseas and we want to make sure you're not involved in something nefarious. | ||
| I can understand that. | ||
| I completely understand that. | ||
| That's not what they said. | ||
| They said, because of the comments you made online, either about Israel or the Jews, they show up and knock on the door. | ||
| No warrant, no crime. | ||
| Is this what we can? | ||
| I mean, imagine any other situation. | ||
| Any other situation. | ||
| This would be a national news story, and you would already have Pam Bondi making statements. | ||
| Let's just flip the script. | ||
| Considering that we have more than enough examples of Jews online saying the most outrageous and offensive and sickening things about non-Jews, like Randy Fine, for example. | ||
| And what if some sheriff in Texas saw a Jewish person posting something he didn't like, and so he sent a couple deputies to set that Jew straight? | ||
| Hey, we were just here about some comments you made about Jesus Christ online. | ||
| Oh, is it clear now what's happening? | ||
| If it's any other group of people, any other situation, is it not abundantly clear what's going on here? | ||
| Using American law enforcement to intimidate and silence Americans for criticizing a foreign state? | ||
| Do you think it stops here? | ||
| I cannot believe what I just saw. | ||
| And what is this other video they sent me? | ||
| Oh, from Adam the Angler. | ||
| We must eliminate the Jews. | ||
| It's the only solution at this point. | ||
| We must protect and save Christianity. | ||
| Is that it? | ||
| Is that the one? | ||
| We must eliminate the Jews? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| You go to jail now, sir. | ||
| You go to jail. | ||
| Okay, again, it's like, is it something I would say? | ||
| No, obviously not. | ||
| Is it shockingly similar to the name of courses that Harvard teaches? | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
| Again, you know, I really have a hard time being shocked and appalled and fainting at somebody saying eliminate the Jews when I have Harvard professors writing books saying abolish whiteness. | ||
| What's the difference? | ||
| What's the difference? | ||
| Who's the subject? | ||
| That's the difference. | ||
| And that's not a good enough excuse. | ||
| That is not a distinction. | ||
| So it's either all okay or it's not okay. | ||
| The answer is, it's all okay. | ||
| The answer is, in fact, if you're not calling for violence or encouraging violence or calling for people to commit crimes or trying to put a bounty on a politician's head, yeah, there's certain things that no, you're not allowed to do because they actually impact the real world and are simply the precursor to physical action. | ||
| Fine. | ||
| But you have to be offended when you come to America. | ||
| It is a prerequisite of being an American that you must be okay with being offended. | ||
| You must be okay with people hating you. | ||
| You must be okay with people saying things that you vehemently and deeply disagree with. | ||
| That's the cost of being an American. | ||
| That's the price you have to pay. | ||
| Price I have to pay. | ||
| In return, what we get is freedom of speech, which is freedom of thought, which is a direct connection to the truth, what is subjective, I'm sorry, objective reality. | ||
| So yeah, you have to be offended. | ||
| You have to be outraged. | ||
| You have to be horrified at what people say. | ||
| You have to. | ||
| That's the price you pay in return for thinking your own thoughts and knowing the truth. | ||
| But we got to get this guy on. | ||
| We got to reach out to this guy. | ||
| I don't want to let this go. | ||
| And these officers shouldn't be allowed to be let go. | ||
| Absolutely unacceptable. | ||
| And it wouldn't even be a discussion if it was literally any other topic. | ||
| Any other topic, any other person getting a knock on their door from heavily armed police for expressing their opinion. | ||
| This ends now. | ||
| It has to end now. | ||
| We have to end it. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the war room and forwards.com banned.video. | ||
| Let me tell you right now, if you haven't tried ultramethylene, you got to go today to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| It's just jam-packed full of all sorts of incredible stuff. | ||
| Active B2, P52, P5P form of B6, cranks out GABA, serotonin, and dopamine, like a neurotransmitter factory. | ||
| 5,000 micrograms of neurological B12 that regrows damaged nerves and shields your memory. | ||
| And it just goes on. | ||
| I can go on forever. | ||
| To 100 milligrams of CoQ10, the antioxidant king that protects your neurons from oxidative assault and powers every thought you fire. | ||
| The stock of ultramethylene red is limited. | ||
| The globalists hate when you think clearly. | ||
| They hate when you have energy. | ||
| They hate when your brain is firing on all cylinders. | ||
| Do the thing they hate, folks. | ||
| Go to thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison. | ||
| Get yourself some ultramethylene red. | ||
| Sign up. | ||
| You get it for 50% off if you sign up for the regular deliveries. | ||
| And, of course, you can get it for an even greater discount if you're a VIP member and pair it with ultramethylene blue to maximize the power of both. | ||
| Let's talk about Josh Hammer, shall we? | ||
| Actually, before we do that, before we talk about Josh Hammer, I just saw a comment somebody made on one of my posts because I've been going after Josh Hammer pretty hard today for the last little while because he's a almost cartoonishly stupid person. | ||
| Somebody says, China is our greatest threat, and blaming Israel on low-IKE is a low IQ stance. | ||
| Sorry, I'm not signing with somebody who parrots the talking points of the administration. | ||
| Guess we'll agree to disagree. | ||
| I guess that was in response to somebody, maybe me. | ||
| Is China a threat? | ||
| They could be if they wanted to, but put yourself in China's shoes. | ||
| Imagine you are a Chinese member of the Politburo or whatever it is they have over there, the Chinese Communist Party. | ||
| And you look over across the Pacific Ocean and you see America. | ||
| What do you see? | ||
| Do you see a major threat that's coming for you? | ||
| Do you see a powerful and dynamic nation that is expanding and squeezing you and threatening you and you're going to have to defend yourself? | ||
| Or do you see a collapsing mess? | ||
| If you're China, do you interrupt the process of America's collapse by starting a war with it? | ||
| Or do you do everything you can to just keep the pace? | ||
| They don't have to do anything. | ||
| What does China have to do? | ||
| What could China do to America that we haven't done to ourselves? | ||
| It's a meme, but it's also kind of true. | ||
| The policies of the left that have been instituted in America for the last 70 years have had a more devastating impact than the nukes we dropped on Japan. | ||
| They rebuilt. | ||
| Their cities are amazing again. | ||
| Yeah, they were reduced to rubble at one point, but now they're fantastic. | ||
| What happened to our cities? | ||
| When do we get to rebuild? | ||
| They're destroyed. | ||
| They're hauled out. | ||
| They're empty. | ||
| They're depressing and messy and filthy and crime-ridden. | ||
| Why would China want to interrupt the trajectory that we are on? | ||
| I don't think China's a threat. | ||
| I think we're a threat to ourselves. | ||
| I think the enemy is inside the gates. | ||
| Would China be a threat? | ||
| Could China be a threat? | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Are they our primary international competitor? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Should we be working to minimize their growth and maximize our? | ||
| Yes, obviously. | ||
| Here's what we shouldn't be doing. | ||
| One, driving Russia into their hands. | ||
| Obviously. | ||
| But that's what we're doing. | ||
| So, I mean, how big of a threat is China if our entire foreign policy seems designed to empower them? | ||
| Again, I would ask, you know, did China achieve the power they currently have attained on their own? | ||
| Or did they do it entirely under the willful contribution of the American elite? | ||
| They don't want to go to war. | ||
| They got no reason to. | ||
| All they have to do is maintain and watch while America destroys ourselves from the inside out. | ||
| So I understand China is a major threat. | ||
| I don't bemoan anybody from talking about the threat of China, but if I was Chinese, I wouldn't give a damn what America was doing. | ||
| I would just keep on keeping on. | ||
| Knowing that in the trajectories our two nations are heading with no meaningful interruption, they take over. | ||
| We collapse. | ||
| No blood need be shed. | ||
| God, these images are terrifying, to be honest with you. | ||
| Okay, so here's the other thing. | ||
| Here's the other thing I bring up about this because, you know, Trump's making deals with China right now. | ||
| They're claiming victory, but what I've heard from people with knowledge of the situation say the Chinese are basically laughing at us and don't feel threatened by us and are basically just waiting us out. | ||
| Meanwhile, what's Israel up to? | ||
| What's Israel doing? | ||
| For one thing, they're trying to destroy MAGA. | ||
| They're trying to destroy the right wing in this country by demanding that we expel our most prominent and successful members, insane, for the sake of them. | ||
| And it's, you know, the desperation makes sense because what are they going to do if the Republicans drop support of Israel? | ||
| Go to the Democrats? | ||
| No. | ||
| No, no, no. | ||
| That's not happening anytime soon. | ||
| The Democrats are firmly against Israel and will be for the time being. | ||
| They're more easily manipulatable, so maybe that's a long-term strategy, but the question here isn't whether MAGA will survive without Israel. | ||
| It's if Israel will survive without MAGA. | ||
| And they need to turn MAGA. | ||
| They need to turn the Republicans into Israeli sycophants who will not accept a single deviation from complete submission to their every whim. | ||
| Because if they aren't welcomed in the Republican Party, they got nowhere to go. | ||
| They'll be politically homeless in this country. | ||
| Now, all they really have to do is just be American. | ||
| It's not hard. | ||
| All you have to do, stop making demands, stop bitching, stop whining, stop screeching and squealing and demanding that we drop Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Just shut up. | ||
| Literally, you'd be fine. | ||
| They just can't do it. | ||
| And again, it's like the people that they are right now just, you know, viciously trying to destroy Candace Owens, Nick Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, none of them started off hating Israel. | ||
| Most of them still don't. | ||
| If you had just been nice to them, if you'd just been reasonable, if you just understood that their questions come from a place of sincere objection to the brutality Israel is waging and have some consideration and empathy for that, this wouldn't be an issue. | ||
| You have to attack for some reason. | ||
| You can't help but attack, and it's destroying yourself. | ||
| You absolute morons, Josh Hammer. | ||
| So he writes this article. | ||
| It's called this. | ||
| Tucker Carlson just hit a new low with this heinous betrayal of my friend Charlie Kirk, who is surely rolling in his grave. | ||
| Frankly, I'm shocked Josh Hammer was able to write the title of an article without mentioning his book in it. | ||
| That's a rare accomplishment for Josh Hammer. | ||
| He says this, and I don't, we're talking about this on Moonbase. | ||
| We can't even figure out what this first sentence is supposed to mean. | ||
| On Monday evening, the most dangerous man in America sat down to interview a confused millennial. | ||
| So who's who? | ||
| Who's who? | ||
| I guess Tucker is interviewing Nick. | ||
| Nick is a Zoomer, not a millennial. | ||
| That would make Tucker Carlson the most dangerous man in America. | ||
| So who cares who the most dangerous man in America interviews? | ||
| He's the most dangerous man. | ||
| This first sentence doesn't even make sense. | ||
| On Monday evening, the most dangerous man in America, Tucker Carlson, which again, if he's the problem, if he's the most dangerous man in America, who cares who he's interviewing? | ||
| He's the dangerous one, right? | ||
| But no, he sat down to interview a confused millennial, by which I guess he means a very clear-minded and intelligent Zoomer. | ||
| Okay, so we're not even one sentence in, and there's already like four misconceptions or lies or mistakes. | ||
| I don't know what it is, but clearly this guy's, you know, a genius. | ||
| The pair, who for a month had been regaling the masses with a bit of low-rent turf war Kfabe, implying the other was an undercover Fed, parentheses federal agent, decided to drop the faux hatchet once and for all. | ||
| Yeah, it's not that Tucker and Nick had sincere disagreements about policy and then they discussed it. | ||
| Like the paranoia and conspiracy madness that comes out of this article really should make your head spin if you understand what he's implying here. | ||
| He's implying that Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson are in fact on the same team, have nothing but love for each other, and yet for our benefit are pretending to snipe back and forth. | ||
| Is that the type of thing Josh Hammer's involved in? | ||
| That's all I can imagine. | ||
| No, the beef was real. | ||
| It was obviously real. | ||
| It happened right out in front of all of us. | ||
| John Carlson would make a snyder remark. | ||
| Nick Fuentes would come back with an expose. | ||
| I mean, you know, it was happening. | ||
| And then Alex Jones helped squash the beef. | ||
| Alex Jones helped bring Nick and Tucker together. | ||
| And now nobody will shut up about it. | ||
| The whole thing's on fire. | ||
| But the reason I want to read this whole article for you, it's not long. | ||
| The reason I don't want to just show you the highlights or pick and choose what to read is because I want you to see for yourself that this entire article is utterly devoid of argument. | ||
| It is utterly devoid of fact. | ||
| This is nothing but vicious, invective insults, screeching, crying, and lying. | ||
| The entire article. | ||
| Not a line escapes that definition. | ||
| So, first, he calls Tucker Carlson dangerous, and he basically insults Nick, saying he's confused. | ||
| Then he says basically they're liars, they're pretending to not like each other, but really it's all just Kfabe, which, if you don't know what that is, that's that's the idea of it's from pro wrestling. | ||
| The Kfabe is the fake reality that they build. | ||
| So, if you know, whoever, you know, two wrestlers are beefing with each other, but really they're best friends behind the scenes. | ||
| But the Kfabe beef is they go in the ring and they fight each other and act like they're actually enemies, but really they're best friends behind the scenes. | ||
| That's what he means when he says K-Fabe, in case you don't know. | ||
| They did so not necessarily because they care for one another, but because their shared passion for tackling a mutual foe, Western civilization, that's right, folks, Nick Fuentes and Tucker Carlson, who basically are defined by Western civilization, whose entire careers and personalities and home decoration is defined by their overt love and dedication to Western civilization. | ||
| Tucker Carlson is sitting beneath a chandelier made of antlers. | ||
| The man is Daniel Boone in the 21st century. | ||
| You're saying that he is motivated entirely by a secret desire to tear down Western civilization. | ||
| He and Nick don't hate each other. | ||
| That was fake. | ||
| That was faux, as he put it. | ||
| That was Kayfabe, but they don't like each other either. | ||
| He knows because he's a mind reader. | ||
| And they're just pretending to like each other now because they align both hate Western civilization. | ||
| That's what this guy wants you to believe. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| I don't even need to tell you how absurd that is, but it's kind of like the definition of racism. | ||
| It's like to a leftist, they'll say black people can't be racist because the definition of racism basically can only apply to white people. | ||
| That's kind of what Josh Hammer here is doing. | ||
| He's saying they're enemies of Western civilization because in his mind, the definition of Western civilization is Judaism. | ||
| And he thinks they're enemies of Judaism, which I wouldn't even say that. | ||
| He continues. | ||
| They hate Western civilization. | ||
| It's their mutual foe, which for millennia has claimed the Hebrew Bible, Old Testament, as its preeminent moral and legal wellspring. | ||
| The Old Testament is our preeminent moral and legal wellspring, which is why none of us eat shellfish, which is why none of us ever wear clothes with multiple threads in it. | ||
| Modern Judaism isn't even predicated on the Old Testament. | ||
| That's why they created the Talmud. | ||
| The Old Testament, the Torah, applied when there was a temple and the law was in place. | ||
| Jesus Christ came as the Messiah, made a new covenant. | ||
| The Old Testament doesn't apply directly anymore. | ||
| It's used, it's brilliant, it's history, but the laws from the Old Testament were replaced by the laws of Jesus Christ. | ||
| That was the point. | ||
| That was why he was killed, by the way. | ||
| You don't get killed for going, obey the law. | ||
| All right. | ||
| He was killed because he came and said, hey, you know the law? | ||
| Here's your new law. | ||
| That's not the law anymore. | ||
| This is the new law. | ||
| Hey, you know what the Pharisees say is the law? | ||
| Yeah, they're wrong. | ||
| I'm here to tell you what the law is. | ||
| That's why they killed him. | ||
| So to say that it's like Christianity isn't predicated on the laws of the Old Testament. | ||
| Modern Judaism isn't even predicated on the laws of the Old Testament. | ||
| To say that Western civilization is predicated on the laws of the Old Testament is a lie. | ||
| Just to be clear, he says, I'm not talking about George Soros and Hassan Piker. | ||
| What, really? | ||
| This was a chat between erstwhile king of cable news, Tucker Carlson, and Nick Fuentes, the loquacious Holocaust denier who has been leading an anti-Semitic provocative, who has been a leading anti-Semitic provocateur since he first burst on the political commentary scene a decade ago. | ||
| He says, Fuentes, perhaps most infamous for a 2019 rant wherein he analogized Jews massacred by the Nazis to the Sesame Street character cookie monster baking cookies in an oven in an attempt to explain why six million dead Jews at the hand of the Nazis just doesn't make sense, stayed true to his form during the Tucker Carlson interview. | ||
| Okay, let's unpack this one, shall we? | ||
| The cookie monster rant. | ||
| The infamous cookie monster rant wasn't even a rant. | ||
| It was a super chat from somebody else. | ||
| I know this because I've routinely brought this up because of the proximity to which you need to be to an anti-Semitic joke to yourself be tainted by Holocaust denial. | ||
| Remember, when I tried to interview Sebastian Gorka at CPAC in like 2021, I think, or something like that, 2020, it must have been. | ||
| He said, I don't want to talk to you because you're within fours, which is Alex Jones. | ||
| Alex Jones is associated with Nick Fuente. | ||
| Nick Fuentes is a Holocaust denier because of the Cookie Monster thing. | ||
| Now, the Cookie Monster thing was actually a super chat that he laughed at. | ||
| He read aloud, as you do with super chats, and then he responded to it, laughing and joking. | ||
| The joke being, the cookie monster wants 6 million cookies. | ||
| He only has this many ovens and this long to bake it. | ||
| Is that possible? | ||
| And Nick Fuentez laughs and goes, I don't know, 6 million, 6 million cookies in that amount of time. | ||
| That doesn't seem reasonable. | ||
| I don't know if you could achieve that many cookies baking in that amount of time. | ||
| It seems like you need more time for that. | ||
| Laughing at what somebody else had said. | ||
| So this is how close you have to be in order for a gay whale to want to reject you from CPAC. | ||
| Is you, is I work for a guy who has worked with Nick Fuentes who once read a comment about a joke about the Holocaust. | ||
| Therefore, I have to be persona non grata. | ||
| That's the taint, right? | ||
| Okay, so it wasn't a rant. | ||
| It wasn't Nick Fuentes angrily ranting about the cookie monster. | ||
| It's him literally laughing at a joke somebody else wrote and going, I don't know if that makes sense totally. | ||
| Okay, but point being, so far we are, you know, just finished the first page of this article. | ||
| We've seen absolutely nothing from anything Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes said, despite the fact that that's supposed to be what this article is about. | ||
| So far we have him calling Tucker Carlson dangerous, saying that they're liars, saying they hate Western civilization, calling Nick Fuentes confused, a liar, hates Western civilization, anti-Semitic Holocaust denier who hates Jews. | ||
| Okay, so no substance yet, no argument yet, no facts yet, but he has been sure to poison the well, as it were. | ||
| No pun intended. | ||
| At various points, Fuentes mused about the evils of organized Jewry and contended that discredited neoconservatism cannot be divorced from Jewishness. | ||
| That's news to this Jew, which again, it's just, it's, this is just dishonest. | ||
| This is dishonest. | ||
| Neoconservatism was created by Jewish individuals for, like on that basis, because they wanted a relationship with Israel to be maintained, because they wanted America working with Israel to help them achieve their end to the Middle East. | ||
| It is, you can't divorce it from Jewishness. | ||
| Like, that's who the neoconservatives were. | ||
| Now, what Josh Hammer is insinuating is that somehow, because he's Jewish, he must be a neoconservative, which is an inversion of what was actually said. | ||
| Just to be clear, I hopefully you understand that. | ||
| The host's response, in turn, was so fawning that it amounted to laundering of Fuentes' repugnant beliefs. | ||
| And so, what's repugnant about that belief? | ||
| What's repugnant about saying, hey, you know, the neocons that wrote down their plans for American foreign policy that were then adhered to by the Bush administration, they were all Jewish and predicated a lot of their geopolitical agenda on that fact. | ||
| Is that repugnant for anybody? | ||
| I mean, that's history. | ||
| It's just basic normal history. | ||
| Everybody knows this. | ||
| Well, why would it even be a bad thing? | ||
| Crazy. | ||
| Fuentes, who's personally called me filth, well, you are, said the Jews like me and broadcaster Mark Levin are not American and do not belong here. | ||
| Jews like me. | ||
| The most important part of that sentence being like me, like me. | ||
| He's not saying all Jews are not American. | ||
| He's saying people that clearly and repeatedly reinforce the idea. | ||
| They clearly express and repeatedly reinforce the idea that they value Israel more than America. | ||
| They're trying to destroy the Republican Party right now because some members aren't sufficiently sycophantic towards Israel. | ||
| Again, where's the issue? | ||
| Again, it's this guy is anti-American. | ||
| This guy is un-American. | ||
| Mark Levin doesn't prioritize America. | ||
| He prioritizes Israel. | ||
| I think it's fine to have a problem with that. | ||
| I think it's fine to have a problem, especially if the people are dual citizens with another country and seem to value and benefit that country. | ||
| It's the same reason I get pissed off at Omar Fatah. | ||
| Who the hell are you? | ||
| You're a foreigner. | ||
| You're going to come here and have your foreign beliefs and your prioritization of your foreign country. | ||
| Screw you. | ||
| These people in Omar Fetta, yeah, they're not American. | ||
| Sorry. | ||
| You can behave like you can make that choice at any moment to prioritize America at any point in time, at any second of the day. | ||
| You can say to yourself, you know, Josh Hammer, today I'm not going to shill for Israel. | ||
| But you don't. | ||
| You routinely do, and you admit it yourself. | ||
| So, like, what are we supposed to say? | ||
| And again, you can just look at some of his own statements. | ||
| You know, I'm going to go through this stack next, but just to cut the line a little bit. | ||
| Josh Hammer, here's one of his tweets. | ||
| I am Jewish proudly. | ||
| I advocate every single day for my life for the Jewish people, for the Jewish state of Israel. | ||
| Okay, so I don't know. | ||
| I'm an American. | ||
| I've never once advocated for the Jewish state of Israel. | ||
| Is it wrong for me to say that means that your priority is with the state of Israel and not America, and that therefore makes you less American than somebody whose priority is America? | ||
| Is this a difficult concept for you to obtain, Josh Hammer? | ||
| If you're out there going, I think about Israel every day and every day I work for the Jewish state Israel. | ||
| And people are like, that doesn't sound very American. | ||
| He's like, how dare you? | ||
| And he turns to the other Jews and goes, you hear that? | ||
| He says Jews aren't American. | ||
| Stop. | ||
| Stop using your ethnicity as a shield, you miserable cow. | ||
| Predictably claimed yet again on Carlson's own show that American Jews put interests of Israel over the interests of their own country. | ||
| Well, some do. | ||
| You do, in particular. | ||
| Mark Levin does, in particular. | ||
| You know, I shudder to think that people can't see through this. | ||
| That is the most transparent defense method you can imagine. | ||
| Oh, they're insulting me. | ||
| Oh, they're questioning me. | ||
| I know. | ||
| I'll say he's actually questioning all Jews so that this isn't seen as a criticism of my beliefs. | ||
| It's instead interpreted as a hatred of the Jewish people so I can silence and expel these people from the party that I glommed onto after my bid to oust Trump with DeSantis failed. | ||
| I'm going to continue with this because, again, so far, we have, he mentioned one thing, and he mentioned that neoconservatism cannot be divorced from Jewishness, you know, because of history. | ||
| This was a chat between Nick Fuentes and Loquacious Holocaust Nyer, leading anti-Semitic provocateur Fuentes, who has personally called me filth. | ||
| We read that already. | ||
| Looks like this printed out double some pages. | ||
| That's weird. | ||
| Okay, this is another hilarious lie that he puts out. | ||
| Let's see, how does it start? | ||
| Tucker Carlson sparks backlash for hosting, or here you go, but yeah, he says, American Jews put the interests of Israel over the interests of their own country. | ||
| It's a monstrous and destructive lie. | ||
| He claimed that Jews hate Europeans because Romans destroyed the temple in Jerusalem two millennia ago. | ||
| Not even realized this the first time I read it, but that sentiment doesn't even make any sense. | ||
| That's such a, again, another just complete inversion of reality. | ||
| First of all, Nick Fuentez brought up how Eric Weinstein went to the Temple of, or I'm sorry, the Arch of Titus in Rome and has a picture of him flicking off the Arch of Titus, saying, I'm here after 2,000 years to, you know, say F you to Titus. | ||
| And it's like, Americans don't think like that. | ||
| We don't harbor ill will towards a long dead empire because of what they did to people we weren't related to 2,000 years ago. | ||
| Like, that's a very sick mindset. | ||
| And Josh Hammer turns that into Europeans hate Jews because Rome killed, destroyed the temple. | ||
| We'll get back into this on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Third hour of the war room is on. | ||
| I'll open up the phone lines for your calls this hour. | ||
| We'll get back into this article from Josh Hammer. | ||
| Just seeing if there's any other videos I want to go to first. | ||
| Let's just get back into it. | ||
| I could keep going through. | ||
| Just take my word for it. | ||
| There's no substance in this article. | ||
| It's just taking everything out of context. | ||
| There's some very hilarious stretches this guy makes. | ||
| Because he's basically insinuating that Tucker Carlson is like a spy for Muslims. | ||
| It again is just the strangest. | ||
| It's the, I guess, the logical end of the Tucker Katarlson smear. | ||
| But he just says the most ridiculous stuff. | ||
| And it all ends with the really provocative and outrageous statement that he made. | ||
| And again, just the way he's trying to frame this is so baffling and weird. | ||
| If this looks like a war on MAGA and the modern American right, that's because this is exactly what it is. | ||
| Carlson and his clan have declared their jihad not on the woke forces of civilizational arson on the adult-brained left, but on the forces of civilizational sanity on the MAGA right. | ||
| Tuck Carlson hasn't attacked people on the right. | ||
| He's been the subject of attack. | ||
| He hasn't said things that are insane and anti-civilization. | ||
| He's merely questioned the strategic intelligence of Israel behaving in the way that it does. | ||
| He has moderately questioned the actions of the Israeli government, but in Josh Hammer's mind, that's an attack on MAGA, apparently. | ||
| And by waging an all-out, you know, full-fledged war on Tucker Carlson, trying to, you know, blackmail and intimidate and coerce people into rejecting and ostracizing him, you're the one starting the war, dumbass. | ||
| Everybody sees it. | ||
| Everybody knows it. | ||
| And it's a war you can't win because Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes are truthful and honest. | ||
| Say what you want about them. | ||
| They're straightforward. | ||
| They're upfront. | ||
| They say what they believe, and what they believe is the truth. | ||
| So you're not going to intimidate us. | ||
| You're not going to demand that we expel them, especially when you're an interloper yourself. | ||
| You're not MAGA. | ||
| You were trying to oust Trump and get DeSantis in. | ||
| And it's like these people who have contributed nothing. | ||
| Nobody even knew who Josh Hammer was before he was associated with Charlie Kirk's assassination. | ||
| I'd literally never heard of the guy until the Dave Smith debate. | ||
| How much has Josh Hammer done? | ||
| How many votes did he get for Donald Trump? | ||
| How many people came over to the Donald Trump train because old Josh Hammer said something? | ||
| It's just hilarious and absurd. | ||
| They hope to burn down MAGA and build a neo-pagan, anti-Western, anti-biblical movement in its stead. | ||
| Despite the fact that Tucker Carlson can't help himself but constantly bring up his faith, his Christianity, his deeply held religious convictions, including him personally believing he was attacked by a demon. | ||
| Oh, but he's a pagan. | ||
| Nick Fuentez, the guy who talks about Catholicism more than anybody I've ever heard. | ||
| And again, a very sincere and devoted way. | ||
| He's a pagan, Josh Hammer. | ||
| Just why lie? | ||
| Why lie like this? | ||
| When it's so obvious, when it's so apparent, when it's so disgusting, I really think he thinks he's cleverer than he is. | ||
| And you know, maybe to people with lower IQ, maybe this stuff just makes sense to them. | ||
| I really fear that. | ||
| Like, if you have any reading comprehension at all, it should be obvious that everything in this article is a smear. | ||
| It's all just baseless invective and hatred. | ||
| What's really coming out here is hatred and a demand for control of an organization that Josh Hammer did nothing to build and has no influence over. | ||
| You are impotent. | ||
| You have been beaten. | ||
| Go away forever. | ||
| Apologize first. | ||
| Apologize for lying. | ||
| Apologize for saying Tucker Carlson should be neutralized. | ||
| Then go away. | ||
| All right, folks. | ||
| I'm going to go out to your phone calls. | ||
| I'm going to talk about Arctic Frost and all the incredible stuff that's been exposed through some of the latest revelations. | ||
| And I wouldn't typically spend so much time on one story, on one article like this. | ||
| I think it's worth it because, I mean, this is the contest that's happening right now. | ||
| This is the conflict. | ||
| And really, the fate of America is being decided at this moment. | ||
| Will the Republican Party tie itself resolutely and irrevocably to the Israel First movement, which in turn will destroy MAGA, will destroy the Republican Party into the future, will doom America to control by the out-of-control, rabid, anti-Christian, anti-American, anti-white, socialist, communist scum on the left that's really having a heyday in the extremes of the leftist party these days. | ||
| Are we going to go down that path or are we going to actually be America first? | ||
| We're going to actually do what is good for America and Americans only and exclusively. | ||
| And hey, if that means helping Israel because it helps us, fine. | ||
| Again, I'm not even anti-Israel. | ||
| It's like, just shut up. | ||
| Just shut up and go away and stop trying to destroy our country because some of our leading Republicans have mild criticisms of Israel. | ||
| How people can't see through this, I don't understand. | ||
| But this is the point that this article has been such, has been so controversial is these last couple sentences. | ||
| So he says that Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, they aren't sincere, they aren't legitimate, they aren't Christian, they aren't deeply American. | ||
| They're actually neo-pagan, Islamo-fascist agents that work for Qatar and want to usher in some sort of neo-pagan, anti-biblical movement. | ||
| It's just pure, absolute projection. | ||
| But the last sentence is, the fox is now comfortably ensconced in the hen house. | ||
| And unless the fox is neutralized, the victim could be the entire extant GOP coalition itself. | ||
| Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes have to be neutralized. | ||
| Neutralized. | ||
| They're foxes in the hen house. | ||
| Don't you love that? | ||
| So I guess in his belief system, Tucker Carlson is the most deeply undercover operative of all time. | ||
| The man spent 40 years building up legitimacy and a reputation in the right-wing community as a right-wing America first staunch conservative. | ||
| It was all a lie. | ||
| It was all a trick. | ||
| It was all a disguise. | ||
| So that now, 40 years later, it just so happens to align with the genocide in Gaza and all this other stuff. | ||
| But finally, he unmasks himself as the enemy within. | ||
| Shut up, Josh Hammer. | ||
| You're an idiot. | ||
| Nobody believes this. | ||
| Nobody thinks it's true. | ||
| So let's get into some of the reactions to this because that's where the funny stuff really happens. | ||
| That's where the juice really gets flown here. | ||
| So this is, again, it's just like the ultimate irony, the ultimate hypocrisy. | ||
| It's hilarious in a way that's hard to even grasp. | ||
| I just read to you portions of an entire article published by Josh Hammer, whose entire purpose was to try to discredit Nick Fuentez and Tucker Carlson by insinuating that what they said were dog whistles, were secretly concealing their real intentions, that they may profess one thing, but the reality is the other. | ||
| That actually they're involved in some sort of conspiratorial orchestration to manipulate the American people. | ||
| He spends an entire article taking their words out of context, smearing them in the most blatant way you can imagine, taking out words or phrases to try to frame them as despicable and anti-Semitic and all this other stuff. | ||
| And then he says they have to be neutralized. | ||
| And people look at that and go, we know what that means. | ||
| I mean, hell, I guess when some right-wing conservative influencers go anti-Israel, I guess they have to be neutralized. | ||
| I won't say Charlie Kirk was neutralized, but I think that's the insinuation. | ||
| And first of all, even if all he's saying is, you know, ostracized, even if this isn't an oblique, you know, call to neutralize them in the way that we all know that it means. | ||
| But let's just pretend that we're idiots. | ||
| Let's pretend we're all as dumb as Josh Hammer thinks we are. | ||
| Is that even still a good thing? | ||
| Is that even a reasonable thing to say? | ||
| So Josh Hammer, who's never influenced anybody ever, who has no power, no, I mean, I have more followers than him on X. He's nobody, but somehow he's writing articles in the Daily Mail. | ||
| Somehow he's best friends with Charlie Kirk. | ||
| He's his Israeli handler. | ||
| It's like this guy's being shoved down our throat, obviously, because of the totally natural and meritocratic way people like this get to the highest rungs of our society. | ||
| And he wants to use what little crumb of power he's obtained to split the MAGA coalition down the middle, to demand that we adhere to his demand, that we kick anybody out that he doesn't like. | ||
| We have to neutralize, i.e. | ||
| ostracize, i.e. | ||
| destroy utterly and cancel some of the most prominent, the most well-respected, the most popular people on the right wing today. | ||
| So even if all he meant was ostracize, it's still a retarded and entitled and outrageous demand to make that he should be laughed at on that alone. | ||
| But we all know what he meant. | ||
| And you can't act innocent and you can't act like you're just, you know, how dare you, how dare you quote me verbatim after I spent an entire article misquoting Nick Fuentez and Tucker Carlson in order to smear them. | ||
| He's been an entire article insinuating that they didn't believe what they said, claiming that the things they said are actually just dog whistles that mean this other thing. | ||
| He spends an entire article doing that. | ||
| Then people quote him verbatim and he cries foul, which may have been the intention in the first place. | ||
| I bet he agonized over that last sentence. | ||
| I bet he went, you know, if I say neutralized, it's going to be obvious what I'm saying and people are going to be mad at that, but I didn't actually say it. | ||
| So then I can play victim. | ||
| So then when people recognize what I'm saying and call me out for it, I can say, oh, well, how dare you? | ||
| I say neutralized and you accuse me of wanting somebody killed? | ||
| Again, the anti-Semitism. | ||
| Like, who knows? | ||
| Maybe that was the intention of using such a provocative and deliberately outrageous word, but I don't know. | ||
| So he says, a few weeks ago, bad faith actors distorted and willfully misconstrued an anodyne tweet of mine calling for the death penalty of Iran of Irina Jarutska's murderer. | ||
| Yesterday, similar bad faith actors deliberately misinterpreted a single word of mine in an op-ed published in a well-known international newspaper. | ||
| These people have an agenda and it's not a good one. | ||
| They're cynical jerks and behave as much. | ||
| I'm not even doing a good impression of him. | ||
| Really I should just be doing a Ben Shapiro impression because that's what he sounds like. | ||
| These people have an agenda and it's not a good one. | ||
| They are cynical jerks and behave as such. | ||
| But for the non-idiots, I abhor political violence, which is in the United States, it's almost entirely a left-wing political phenomenon. | ||
| Someone was recently arrested for making threats against me and a few others. | ||
| I have written countless columns and spoken countless hours explaining why if political violence metastasizes, it could spell the end of the republic. | ||
| I unequivocally condemn each and every instance of political violence, but normal people who understand English or anyone with more than a brain cell between the ears already knew that. | ||
| That is all. | ||
| Thanks, queer. | ||
| Again, it's like, oh my God, oh, they took this word out of context. | ||
| How dare no, they quoted you verbatim after you spent an entire article taking everything Todd Carlson and Nick Fuentes said out of context. | ||
| And yeah, somebody did get arrested for threatening you, didn't they? | ||
| Meanwhile, how many times have we been subject to threats? | ||
| How many times a day are we subjected to outrageous statement? | ||
| Oh, we covered it last week with, who's it, Ariel Morgan? | ||
| Is that her name? | ||
| Being viciously, directly threatened in DMs by a Jewish guy. | ||
| Guy's not even kicked off X. | ||
| She says she's called police department. | ||
| She's called governor. | ||
| She's called her senator and her congressman and the president. | ||
| She's tried to get this to the awareness of the people that were out in front demanding that a guy from Texas be extradited because he said he didn't like Jews. | ||
| So now he's being sent to jail in Florida for his speech. | ||
| The same people that were gung-ho to have that happen on the behalf of Josh Hammer to protect poor dear Josh Hammer's feelings won't even respond to a Christian person under much more severe threat. | ||
| So, like, what do you think you're proving here, Josh Hammer? | ||
| And then you have what he actually believes, which really I think we probably should have started with from Nick Fuentes. | ||
| Josh Hammer called for me and Tucker to be neutralized after our interview. | ||
| Will the FBI investigate that comment? | ||
| Hammer is a Jewish extremist who believes that white people are born with anti-Semitism in their DNA. | ||
| This anti-white filth needs to be held accountable. | ||
| From Josh Hammer, quote, Jew hatred is inherent in European DNA. | ||
| In case you think that was just a one-off, maybe you misheard him. | ||
| He doubles down. | ||
| Europe will never change. | ||
| Jew hatred is inherent in its collective DNA. | ||
| According to Josh Hammer, every European is infected with this plague of anti-Semitism. | ||
| There's probably no cure. | ||
| We probably all have to just be eliminated. | ||
| That was the case. | ||
| I think we have a civil rights case on our hands. | ||
| Because then it'd be kind of like homosexuality. | ||
| We're born this way. | ||
| Well, wait a second. | ||
| I can't, if it's in my DNA, that's sort of like you're saying that I can't be me. | ||
| I can't be how I was born. | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| How dare you stop me from being anti-Semitic? | ||
| It's the way I was, it's an immutable characteristics of me, a European. | ||
| I bet Nick Fuentes has, I bet he has said something along the same lines as this. | ||
| Because he's, you know, he can be, he can be provocative. | ||
| No one's denying that. | ||
| Tucker Carlson, myself, certainly, we've never said anything as offensive as this. | ||
| Europeans have anti-Semitism in their DNA, all Europeans. | ||
| See, this is the way it works. | ||
| When Nick Fuentes says somebody like Mark Levin, who spends all day, every day screeching hysterically about Israel, is more Israeli than he is American. | ||
| Josh Hammer extrapolates that to say Nick Fuentes thinks all Jews are un-American. | ||
| Not what he said, not even close to what he said. | ||
| He didn't make a collective statement. | ||
| He made a statement about an individual that you applied to the collective because it benefits you. | ||
| Josh Hammer, on the other hand, he's not saying one person has anti-Semitism in their DNA. | ||
| He's saying it is an immutable characteristic of every European that they, in their DNA, have the poison of anti-Semitism. | ||
| Everything from these guys are pure projection. | ||
| And it sort of explains why they think the way they do. | ||
| It's the same thing as the left. | ||
| When you have people filled with hatred, filled with, you know, collective, you know, hatreds of a collective, hatred of a group, then you assume everybody thinks like that. | ||
| I've never said, you know, Jews have communism in their DNA. | ||
| Like, makes me feel uncomfortable even saying it as an example. | ||
| They don't feel bad about that. | ||
| I think these tweets are still up as far as I know. | ||
| He's proud of them. | ||
| And, of course, he says, I'm Jewish proudly. | ||
| I advocate every single day of my life for the Jewish people and for the Jewish state of Israel. | ||
| But if you dare suggest that Jews have a collective interest that Josh Hammer is working towards, you're an anti-Semite, mister. | ||
| Which you don't even have to say it. | ||
| It's in your DNA, so you already are an anti-Semite. | ||
| But if you say that, it will only confirm what they already know to be true. | ||
| So everybody is obviously mad that he says that Tucker Carlson has to be neutralized under demands of him, Israel first anti-white scum. | ||
| And then, you know, he says, well, one has to be truly, one has to be truly stupid or willfully disingenuous or both, as far as the case may be, to think that neutralized here means anything other than its most common usages. | ||
| And then he puts the definition of neutralize, which says to make neutral, to cause to undergo neutralization, to make something ineffective, counteract, nullify, careless, that neutralized, carelessness, that neutralized our effort would be the example there. | ||
| Dave Smith responds to this. | ||
| Holy crap, he actually cropped out the third definition. | ||
| Check out the community note. | ||
| He saw it, cropped it out, posted it, and still calls out other, and still calls others liars. | ||
| That's how intentionally dishonest these people are. | ||
| By the way, you know what neutralized definitely doesn't mean. | ||
| Win the debate. | ||
| Dave Smith's brilliant. | ||
| Oh, wait, not shoot. | ||
| Sorry, he's Jewish. | ||
| Now I'm supposed to hate Jews. | ||
| Shoot. | ||
| Dang it. | ||
| The anti-Semitism in my DNA just flared up. | ||
| Here I was agreeing with and respecting and appreciating a truly decent and patriotic man, Dave Smith. | ||
| But I forgot my European DNA demands that I hate all Jews because Josh Hammer says so. | ||
| The idiot. | ||
| So yeah, the actual, the definition for neutralize, the first two are the ones I just read. | ||
| And then the third one is to kill, to destroy. | ||
| It's the military usage. | ||
| It's actually the most obvious and common one because nobody thought you meant that they need to be made neutral. | ||
| Yeah, they need to have their positive charge diminished. | ||
| I'm sure that's what you actually meant, right? | ||
| So he screenshots it, clips, you know, crops out the third definition, the most common and obviously vernacular usage of neutralize and removes that. | ||
| Meanwhile, here's the person demanding that we oust Tucker Carlson from Clint Russell. | ||
| Nine hours, 240 views, one like on his latest podcast, episode 16, The War for the Future MAGA with Josh Hammer. | ||
| 240 views in nine hours, one like. | ||
| This is the guy who thinks he gets to tell the American right who they should listen to, that Tucker Carlson should be neutralized. | ||
| No one, I mean literally no one, gives a single crap about what you have to say. | ||
| You paid propagandists have zero pull. | ||
| More people are learning about Josh Hammer during this program than the last couple of months of his professional work combined. | ||
| What Josh Hammer did to President Trump was extremely dangerous. | ||
| Josh Hammer supported the lawfare to imprison Trump in order to install a candidate in the Republican Party who was more pro-Israel. | ||
| Now he's calling to neutralize conservative leaders who are not sufficiently pro-Israel. | ||
| The FBI must investigate. | ||
| Maybe he should be registered under FARA. | ||
| Yeah, he was a pro-DeSantis guy back when people were trying to stab Trump in the back. | ||
| From Mill at Village Crazy Lady. | ||
| Josh Hammer has repeatedly claimed that from the river to the sea is a call for genocide, no matter how many times the people who chant it say it's not. | ||
| By the way, the motto of the Likud Party, from the river to the sea. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So think about that. | |
| Now, Josh says someone who took his call for Tucker Carlson to be neutralized in the same way a fox in a henhouse is neutralized, as him calling for violence against Tucker is doing so only because they have a deep, dark agenda. | ||
| See how that works? | ||
| They can say whatever they want and must always be interpreted in the most generous, benevolent light possible. | ||
| Meanwhile, everything we say can and will be put through a dog whistle anti-Semitism sieve and used against us for years to come. | ||
| That's a very good point. | ||
| From Vish Burra in response to Will Chamberlain. | ||
| So Will Chamberlain, this is actually funny. | ||
| I'll read Will Chamberlain's first because you'll see. | ||
| Will Chamberlain says, this connects to some thoughts I've been having about gatekeeping and how it's only treated as going one way. | ||
| Usually it's pro-Israel Republicans being accused of gatekeeping. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I did just read an entire article whose entire point of existing was to condemn Republicans for not ousting Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuente. | ||
| So I guess that would be a point in the favor of cancel culture gatekeeping going in that direction. | ||
| Dummy. | ||
| Can you show me the equivalent on the other side? | ||
| But when Tucker brings on the country's most prominent anti-Semite and then talks about how much he despises Christian Zionist, what is he doing if not gatekeeping? | ||
| Expressing his belief? | ||
| Tucker Carlson is not saying we have to oust Christian Zionists. | ||
| He's not saying anybody that's a Christian Zionist must be rejected from the party if we are to survive. | ||
| He's saying, I think you're wrong. | ||
| And I think you're weaponizing people's spiritual beliefs for a cynical and earthly end. | ||
| And that's despicable to him. | ||
| It's despicable for me, too. | ||
| That's not gatekeeping. | ||
| So, yeah, it's like it just. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| What type of argument is this? | ||
| Tucker Carlson expressed a belief, therefore he's gatekeeping just as much as the Zionist right, which has been on a multi-month crusade to destroy him. | ||
| What the hell are you talking about? | ||
| I literally cannot go on X. | ||
| I mean, all I see are people I don't follow. | ||
| I don't follow Will Chamberlain, by the way, that showed up in my feed. | ||
| People I don't follow showing up in my feed, every single one of them saying exactly the same thing in the same chorus voice. | ||
| Oust Tucker Carlson, gatekeep Tucker Carlson. | ||
| This is actually the funniest thing. | ||
| Usually it's pro-Israel Republicans being accused of gatekeeping. | ||
| Cut to Seth Dillon. | ||
| I've always said gatekeeping is good. | ||
| Like Charlie Kirk, I've never thought the conservative movement should welcome everyone's views and values. | ||
| Do you think it should? | ||
| What would it mean in that case to be a conservative? | ||
| Straw man, not actually the argument. | ||
| Nobody's saying because you have to allow moderate, mild, tepid, and temperate criticism of Israel's foreign policy, therefore there are no restrictions. | ||
| Anybody can be a conservative. | ||
| What a ridiculous claim. | ||
| No, Tucker Carlson can be a conservative because he is. | ||
| Nick Fuentes can be a conservative because he is. | ||
| And anybody who's actually conservative and also believes that America shouldn't be tied to the hip and suicidally dedicated to this foreign little cancer on the Mediterranean Sea, that doesn't mean we then allow everybody with any view into the party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you an idiot? | |
| I do love. | ||
| People like to say that we are the gatekeepers. | ||
| And this is like one of the most prominent Christian Zionists being like, I do love gatekeeping after all. | ||
| I am highly in favor of all the gatekeeping that we're all involved in. | ||
| Yeah, we know. | ||
| So, in response to that post from Will Chamberlain, Vish Burra says, Tucker has had both Nick Fuentez and Tuck and Ted Cruz on the show. | ||
| Matt Gates has had both Dinesh D'Souza and Marjorie Taylor Greene on his show. | ||
| Charlie Kirk had Josh Hammer and Dave Smith on his stage. | ||
| Has Mark Levin or any of these guys ever gone out of their way to have Israeli skeptics on their platforms? | ||
| You know, the reverse is also true. | ||
| Netanyahu only appears as a guest on friendly platforms and not confrontational ones. | ||
| I think one side's actions show they've already exhibited grace and the other side hasn't. | ||
| I think this is what needs to be resolved if we want to talk about unity. | ||
| We can start unifying with each other when we open our doors to each other first. | ||
| They'll never do that. | ||
| They'll never do that for exactly the same reason. | ||
| The left never has us on their shows. | ||
| They can't win arguments. | ||
| They're wrong. | ||
| They don't have the truth on their side. | ||
| They don't have the light on their side. | ||
| All they can do to win this contest is silence their opponents. | ||
| That's what the article's about. | ||
| That's what the gatekeeping's about. | ||
| It's so they don't have to confront the arguments that destroy their position. | ||
| Same exact thing that the left does, which in a way is particularly ironic considering the fact that the Israelis like to call us woke right. | ||
| Who's more woke? | ||
| If that's the label you want to put it, which is the more woke tactic to invite your enemies on and discuss the problems you have, to debate them in an open forum, or to demand silence or retribution or threaten retribution. | ||
| Which is the more woke side? | ||
| Now, I don't buy into the woke right label. | ||
| I think it's confusing and useless. | ||
| There are two, what is it? | ||
| So it's not a matter of censorship, but responsibility and discernment. | ||
| Who you talk to and how you talk to them matters. | ||
| Yeah, silence people you disagree with. | ||
| We get it. | ||
| No, we've been dealing with this for 10 years. | ||
| It's not new. | ||
| You're screwed, man. | ||
| All I can say is these people are screwed. | ||
| They're digging the hole even deeper, and eventually they're not going to be able to climb out of it. | ||
| Now, the obvious solution to this is to shut up. | ||
| The obvious and apparent and readily available solution to all of the problems the Israel right side is having: stop attacking MAGA, stop trying to destroy us, stop trying to silence us, stop demanding that we abandon our heroes, shut up and join us. | ||
| In fact, you got to go kiss the wall of the Alamo right now. | ||
| No response to old Josh Hammer for my invite to come on InfoWars. | ||
| We just want to have a little talk. | ||
| Why don't you sit down over here? | ||
| We're going to make him put on a cowboy hat and we're going to make him kiss the Alamo. | ||
| Oh, tables have turned, my friend. | ||
| Tables have turned. | ||
| You're not making demands anymore. | ||
| We are. | ||
| Do you feel in charge? | ||
| I feel like Bane. | ||
| So what I was saying was that there is no woke right. | ||
| It doesn't exist. | ||
| It's just a stupid phrase anyway. | ||
| There's two very distinct and discreet sides. | ||
| It's make America great again and make Israel great again. | ||
| There's America first and there's the Zionist right. | ||
| That's the divide. | ||
| It's obvious. | ||
| It applies to everything. | ||
| The end. | ||
| There you go. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| So we're going to move on now. | ||
| We're going to move on a little bit because we got a lot of political news to talk about. | ||
| And we'll get into the political news here. | ||
| I got a lot of videos to show you as well, actually. | ||
| Let's start off. | ||
| Let's start off a little dose of truth, shall we? | ||
| This is Molly Hemingway telling the truth about the Democrats. | ||
| Democrats not doing so great these days. | ||
| In fact, they're failing in every possible regard. | ||
| But let's go to Molly Hemingway, clip 26 here, as she tells the uncomfortable truth about why the Democrats are behaving in the way that they are. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| I mean, this AOC obsession with Riley Gaines, I find it just delicious because it kind of, you know, it reveals the vapidity of AOC when you get right down to it. | ||
| Well, it's also that the base of the Democrat Party really has become angry women. | ||
| And women who are angry tend to be very mean to other women who are smarter or prettier or more successful or braver than they are. | ||
| And that's what we're seeing here. | ||
| I love it. | ||
| Yeah, the childless cat ladies. | ||
| We know. | ||
| No, we know. | ||
| I got very mad when J.D. Vance called them what they were, childless cat ladies. | ||
| And this is deeper than just sort of a flyby insult. | ||
| The fact is, it's mostly childless women. | ||
| And it is a misplaced motherly instinct that drives them to do what they do. | ||
| Why is it that the Democrats do genuinely benefit and work for the worst people in the world? | ||
| Because they're seen as victims by the women who have an overload, an overabundance of motherly instinct that can't be channeled into their own children. | ||
| So they channel it into rapists and drug dealers and foreigners. | ||
| It's actually very important to understand the psychology of the left, why they do what they do. | ||
| It's not a bad thing that women have motherly instinct. | ||
| It's a very bad thing when it's not directed to the appropriate causes and purposes, raising children who are innocent, who do need help, who can't make decisions for themselves. | ||
| That's how they treat minorities. | ||
| Do you understand? | ||
| They treat minorities like children because they're not mothers. | ||
| That makes so yeah, it's actually a very cutting and deep thing to say. | ||
| I'm not sure if you realize that. | ||
| And, you know, I actually had another video about that exact thing, but I think I don't know if I'm going to be able to find it right now. | ||
| But yeah, this idea of, well, you know, we go to clip, we'll go to clip 36 here because we're talking about the shutdown from InfoWars.com. | ||
| Senate GOP and Democrats working on shutdown off-ramp for next week with government shutdown firmly in its fourth week and snap beneficiaries threatening cannibalism. | ||
| Senate Republicans and Democrats are working behind the scenes on a proposal to reopen the government next week with Central Democrats arguing behind the scenes that their party has successfully highlighted soaring health care costs. | ||
| Let's go to clip 36 here. | ||
| This is very good news for the black community. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Food stamps gone. | |
| Ha ha. | ||
| Section 8 gone. | ||
| Ha ha. | ||
| All your snap and EBT benefits gone. | ||
| Ha ha. | ||
| Now you got to go back to Tyrone. | ||
| Woo! | ||
| I think this is great. | ||
| We have just single-handedly saved the black family. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Tasha can't run out on Tyrone anytime she get mad and think the government gonna take care of her. | ||
| Tasha can't leave Tyrone and think that the kid's gonna eat. | ||
| Tasha can't leave Tyrone and think she's gonna get a free rent. | ||
| Tasha can't depend on the government because years ago, black women turned their back on black men for government assistance, for food stamps, for Section 8, for welfare, for WIC, for all the things that black men bring into their household. | ||
| They said, no, we don't need that. | ||
| I'll go file to the government and they'll give it to me. | ||
| Trump said, hell no. | ||
| Whoo! | ||
| Now you're going to have to start choosing better. | ||
| Now women are going to have to have babies with men that actually want to have babies with them. | ||
| Now, women are going to have to vet their partners and not be able to just hit them up for a check every time and think they can live off the government. | ||
| Woo! | ||
| This shit amazing. | ||
| You want to see more wives and less baby mamas? | ||
| You want to see more two-parent households because it's going to be a family unit? | ||
| Because success is a team sport. | ||
| You're going to see women go back to their men, go back to their child's father and try to work things out and not childishly run out to the next nigga. | ||
| Why? | ||
| Because Donald Trump and the government don't got your back no more. | ||
| Because you can't go over there and get free food stamps and set them bitches 44 to 80. | ||
| Because you don't have a $72 ring anymore. | ||
| Because now you're going to have to figure it out. | ||
| And the only person that's left is that black man that you walked out on years ago. | ||
| And the price of pussy going down to Donald Trump did it with this one. | ||
| And I'm here for it. | ||
| Queens, go back to your kings and work it out. | ||
| Baby mamas, go back to your baby daddies and become wives. | ||
| It's time for us to work together. | ||
| This is actually amazing. | ||
| No longer will you be incentivized by quitting on your household. | ||
| No longer will you be incentivized by quitting on your marriage. | ||
| No longer will you be incentivized by quitting on that black man. | ||
| You are no longer incentivized to leave. | ||
| So baby, you either pay or stay. | ||
| Get ugly money. | ||
| Interesting people to come on my podcast. | ||
| I need some. | ||
| All right, I gotta, okay, who is this guy? | ||
| Yeah, he does a little ad here because he's looking for podcast guests. | ||
| He says he's like the biggest podcast of the Southeast. | ||
| We gotta, I'm putting the crew on this before the end of the show. | ||
| I gotta find out who this guy's name is so I can credit him and invite him on the show. | ||
| I loved that. | ||
| I loved that video. | ||
| He's like, we have saved the black community by cutting off welfare. | ||
| And he's exactly right, obviously. | ||
| Obviously, this is the intention of all of it. | ||
| And it is sort of a, you know, you're suffering from cancer. | ||
| The treatment's going to be painful, but you're going to die without it kind of situation. | ||
| Like, maybe this is, maybe this is the ripping the band-aid off. | ||
| Just like, you know what? | ||
| We're cutting you off. | ||
| Cold turkey. | ||
| The black community has been frankly addicted like a drug to government subsidies for the last 50 years and it's destroyed their lives just like a drug. | ||
| And it's not easy getting off drugs, but you got to get off the drugs before it kills you before it destroys you entirely. | ||
| But will it be painful to cut off SNAP benefits? | ||
| Yeah, it probably would. | ||
| Would it, you know, cause some damage in the short term? | ||
| Probably. | ||
| But the long-term outcome would be self-sufficiency, intact marriages, children being raised in the home with both parents. | ||
| Maybe this is the tough love that not just black community, but all America needs. | ||
| People are realizing this. | ||
| People really are waking up to this. | ||
| And, you know, we're still in a very bad place. | ||
| You know, I'm not trying to contradict what I was saying earlier about like just the aggressiveness Trump needs to have. | ||
| And like, I don't want to come across as if I'm saying, hey, we're all good. | ||
| You know, things are all sunshine and unicorns, but like things are happening, folks. | ||
| But like there is a current shift going on. | ||
| There is a title change occurring. | ||
| Not spectacularly, but quietly and steadily. | ||
| This is happening. | ||
| And I want to go to another video. | ||
| And just to be perfectly clear, because I don't want people thinking I'm pandering because I never pander to anybody. | ||
| I do not choose these people because they're black. | ||
| I just want you to know. | ||
| It just so happens, I don't know, for the last like week, every day I've had like multiple videos of very good black content creators making incredibly powerful content. | ||
| I don't know why it happens to be that way. | ||
| It just does. | ||
| I just, I don't want to be accused of pandering to people's races. | ||
| I'll show your video no matter who you are. | ||
| You hear me? | ||
| So I want to go to the next video here. | ||
| This is a young lady. | ||
| She's actually responding to Tim Pool's. | ||
| So you'll see a Tim Poole video for a little while, but then she picks it up and really brings it all home and explains what the real agenda is about. | ||
| Clip 35. | ||
| RFK Jr., former liberal. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard, former liberal. | ||
| Donald Trump, former liberal. | ||
| Elon Musk, former liberal. | ||
| Colin Wright, former liberal. | ||
| Tim Poole, former liberal. | ||
| How is it that the popular vote winner, Donald Trump, was a Democrat up until his first term? | ||
| That Tulsi Gabber, DNI, former Democrat that I supported in 2020, I never voted Republican. | ||
| I didn't like Republicans. | ||
| And now the Republican MAGA movement, not the neocons, is an eclectic bunch of diverse views which debate each other. | ||
| How is it that Charlie Kirk, Christian conservative with one of the largest conservative platforms, invites moderate pro-choice Timpool onto his stage for his biggest event of the year to discuss those views to the public? | ||
| On the left, what do you think would happen if you went and opposed their views at a public forum? | ||
| You'd be threatened with violence. | ||
| And I'm not saying literally everyone all the time, but booking liberals to come on my show or any other show, people in this country. | ||
| They have the same problem. | ||
| They refuse to do it. | ||
| They don't want to talk. | ||
| Back in, I think it was 2018. | ||
| And by Joe, we should say why as well. | ||
| They're scared of their own time. | ||
| It's a cult. | ||
| So I can sit in front of a libertarian like Dave Smith, who's going to rant about how Israel is bad and Charlie Kirk at the same time. | ||
| And we leave with beers in our hands, smiles on our faces. | ||
| And Dave will say, Charlie, I really do appreciate it. | ||
| I think you do good work. | ||
| I know we disagree. | ||
| The left doesn't do that. | ||
| They firebomb your buildings. | ||
| Or they just don't show up. | ||
| Or they try to get you fired. | ||
| They swat you. | ||
| They harass you. | ||
| The reason I say it's a cult is because you could not define what they believe. | ||
| It's impossible. | ||
| You could not map the logic of their principles or plan for this country. | ||
| Listen, as someone who was canceled by Stripe, as someone who has had their websites hacked and all types of attacks on my business because of a decision that I made as a Christian business owner, this man is telling the truth. | ||
| But I have one pushback against what Timpool is saying. | ||
| I believe that the left does have a clear agenda. | ||
| However, it is not clear to their supporters. | ||
| Their agenda is orchestrated chaos to create a new order. | ||
| Because why would you allow 11 million undocumented immigrants through the border without having adequate systems to vet or the systems to support them? | ||
| Destroying the budgets of some of our biggest cities. | ||
| Why else would you release criminals with a mile-long rap sheet back into society? | ||
| Why else would you allow young children to be able to change their gender? | ||
| Why else would you go against biblically moral sound values that history shows that when you go against them, that that society is doomed for collapse? | ||
| Because that's your goal. | ||
| So Timpool, they do have an agenda. | ||
| Their agenda is to steal, to kill, and to destroy. | ||
| And no Christian should be in alignment with that type of agenda. | ||
| Bing. | ||
| Like we need like a chime bell. | ||
| I need some sort of chime sound effect where it's just like bullseye, nailed it. | ||
| To quote Alex Jones, premeditated, premeditated, premeditated. | ||
| It's all premeditated. | ||
| It's all on purpose. | ||
| Of course their design is chaos. | ||
| It's the only outcome that ever happens when their policies get implemented. | ||
| I'm telling you, folks, people really are waking up. | ||
| I got another video to explain that as well. | ||
| Again, having to do with the government shutdown, because it's all becoming clear. | ||
| Their agenda is truly becoming known by even people who have fallen for the lies this entire time. | ||
| Let's go to clip 30 here. | ||
| This guy said he wasn't a Republican. | ||
| He was in the middle politically. | ||
| But what the Democrats are doing with this shutdown has really opened his eyes to the reality of their intentions as well as the intention of the Republicans. | ||
| Let's go to the video now. | ||
| Did you know that a grand total of six Democrats had to vote yes for you to have benefits? | ||
| That's all it took. | ||
| Every Republican voted yes for you to get your benefits. | ||
| And the thing that pisses me off is as someone that sits very sternly in the middle, it's getting harder and harder for me to even find any light on the left at all anymore because they legitimately don't care about the American people. | ||
| And you can disagree. | ||
| You're allowed to do that. | ||
| But when you disagree, remember, there's not a Republican on record on video saying that they're using your suffering as leverage. | ||
| Remember that. | ||
| Remember that. | ||
| We've got a Democrat, the number two speaking Democrat, number two, mind you, saying that we're using your suffering as leverage. | ||
| And some of you got the nerve to still sit here and blame Donald Trump and Republicans. | ||
| Are you okay? | ||
| You know, Google, again, is free and for everyone. | ||
| Oh, but I don't use Google. | ||
| Duck, duck, go then, bitch. | ||
| You're missing the point. | ||
| The fact that you can easily search this stuff and you refuse to do so, so you can, I don't know what, feel better inside your echo chamber of lies, it doesn't make sense to me, and I'm done with it. | ||
| I'm done with it. | ||
| We're not listening to that anymore, at least on this side. | ||
| People in the middle, especially, are seeing more and more just how shitty the left actually is at this point. | ||
| You pushed me out 15 years ago. | ||
| At that point, I was pushed out. | ||
| You've done nothing but demonize people like me and people that look like me since. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm done with it. | |
| The Great Awakening is on. | ||
| Can I bring up that last frame? | ||
| I don't know if that's possible. | ||
| I want to credit him too. | ||
| All these users are from TikTok, so I don't actually follow them. | ||
| The number one man, one year, one five o' one man, one year, one five oh is that guy. | ||
| Yeah, brilliant. | ||
| That's great. | ||
| I got nothing to add. | ||
| I mean, people really are waking up, and I think it has everything to do with access to information. | ||
| I think if we were still restrained by the normal channels of communication, these people wouldn't know this. | ||
| They wouldn't know what was going on. | ||
| They wouldn't know what the reality was. | ||
| Everything would be hyper-partisan and manipulated through the mainstream media. | ||
| Nobody even cares what these people say anymore. | ||
| Nobody cares what CNN says anymore. | ||
| Nobody cares what MSNBC says anymore. | ||
| We just bring up their clips to laugh at them. | ||
| And more people see our clips than the actual show. | ||
| So nobody's buying their crap anymore. | ||
| They're just seeing for themselves. | ||
| And as that guy lays out, he's like, wait, six Democrats had to vote for this and then benefits would have been extended, but they couldn't get six Democrats to go along, even though every Republican did. | ||
| And then the Democrats are going to blame the Republicans for the benefits shutdown. | ||
| This is absurd. | ||
| When people have access to the truth, when they have access to real information, they make the right choice. | ||
| That's what the information war is all about. | ||
| Let's move on now to the combative aspects of the information war, the actual warfare. | ||
| Arctic Frost. | ||
| As Rachel Bovard put it, Arctic Frost is the story of how Biden's FBI used deranged and completely fictional conspiracies as justification for systematically dismantling the organized conservative right. | ||
| Trump winning in 2024 is literally the only thing that stopped them. | ||
| And this is in response to Sarah Bedford revealing that the FBI was looking into the head of the Conservative Partnership Institute because he, quote, hates the FBI and was, quote, anti-Biden, apparently. | ||
| CPI provides training for conservative congressional staffers who do stuff like oversight, which is not really civil war. | ||
| So the FBI, in their own internal discussion, said, let's investigate this guy because he questions Biden and hates the FBI. | ||
| Just outright Stasi behavior, KGB behavior. | ||
| Just weaponized intelligence by definition. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And it gets even worse. | ||
| Let's go now to clip 24. | ||
| This is John Solomon explaining that the timing of Arctic Frost makes it even worse because this didn't happen right after January 6th. | ||
| It only happened when Donald Trump announced he'd be running in 2024. | ||
| That's when the attacks really got started. | ||
| Here's John Solomon. | ||
| If you thought what happened on January 6th with the electors was bad, you could have done it on the 7th or the 8th or 9th of 2021. | ||
| They wait a whole year until Donald Trump raises his hand and says, I'm getting back in the arena. | ||
| I'm running for 2024. | ||
| And they open up an electronic communication that every expert I talk to says is thin, doesn't meet the rules. | ||
| Then they try to say the crime is by some people offering alternate electors to the Senate. | ||
| That is a criminal conspiracy. | ||
| Now, if you're going to do that, the FBI has an obligation to go back and look at how alternate electors were done in the past. | ||
| They don't do that. | ||
| They ignore the fact that in 1876 and in 1960, alternate electors were submitted to the Senate twice. | ||
| Nobody got prosecuted. | ||
| Nobody thought it was a crime back then. | ||
| Oh, by the way, in both of those cases, it was Democrat candidates who were doing it. | ||
| So they ignore the precedent and they just simply open up and then they just go fishing. | ||
| I call this a MAGA dragnet. | ||
| 400 and plus Republicans and their groups are targeted. | ||
| Eight senators, one House members. | ||
| They're getting millions and millions of lines of phone data, geolocation data. | ||
| They're looking at anything and everything they can, trying to find a crime that they can hang on someone that is close to Donald Trump. | ||
| That's not what law enforcement's done. | ||
| That's not what the Fourth Amendment says we should be doing with our law enforcement. | ||
| I think when you saw the Jim Jordan interview I did last night, he is furious. | ||
| He said, listen, if Jack Smith doesn't come voluntarily, he's getting subpoenaed. | ||
| And by the way, I'm not settling for another renewal of FISA. | ||
| We are changing FISA. | ||
| We're changing the spy rules. | ||
| You can see people are worked up. | ||
| This may be a moment where we get some real civil liberties reforms and some civil and some real accountability. | ||
| Here's the news I want to get. | ||
| We need civil reforms. | ||
| Obviously, the accountability would be primary on my list of concerns. | ||
| We need these people to go to jail. | ||
| We need them punished. | ||
| They violated our rights. | ||
| They weaponized the intelligence community. | ||
| They destroyed people's lives. | ||
| They have to be punished. | ||
| They have to be identified, charged, and imprisoned. | ||
| It is an absolute necessity. | ||
| From Brianna Morello, Alex Jones' names pops up again in the Arctic Frost document dump. | ||
| Oh, by the way, do you know that the reason it's called Arctic Frost is because Arctic Frost is a type of orange in Florida. | ||
| And typically, when they create operations, they have a computer system, an algorithm that assigns random words. | ||
| So you get these random word combinations. | ||
| But they overrode that and designed this one specifically by Arctic Frost because it is about destroying Orange Man. | ||
| Literally, literally, it's admitted the FBI named this operation Arctic Frost as a direct reference to killing oranges because Orange Man bad. | ||
| Okay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Jack Smith issued a subpoena for communications between Alex Jones and Event Strategies Incorporated. | ||
| The subpoena included others as well, like Roger Stone, Rudy Giuliani, Michael Flynn, and more. | ||
| Let's go to the chairman of this operation, Chuck Grassley. | ||
| Clip 28, he exposes Jack Smith's spy ring in all of this. | ||
| Totally absurd. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Whistleblower disclosures. | ||
| 197 subpoenas were issued by Jack Smith and his team. | ||
| These subpoenas were issued to 34 individuals and 163 businesses, including financial institutions. | ||
| And one of the points of contact on many of these subpoenas was that person I previously named Special Agent Walter Giordino. | ||
| The subpoena requested records and communications related to over 430 individual and organizations. | ||
| All of them appear to be aimed at Republicans. | ||
| A subpoena to event strategies requested records relating to Turning Point USA and the Republican Attorney General's Association. | ||
| One subpoena to Apple, sought records relating to Trump and the January 6th prison choir. | ||
| Earlier this year, I obtained emails between and among J.P. Cooney, one of Jack Smith's prosecutors. | ||
| That email exchange was March 2023 about a partisan news article on January 6th. | ||
| And this is what Cooney said in the email: Can we do some work to nail down Trump's role in this, perhaps with the same process on Ed Henry's LLC, end of quote just the next month, April 2023? | ||
| All right, so there's Chuck Grassley with the latest document on Arctic Frost, the investigation into the 2020 election and what happened after the election day. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| New Arctic Frost whistleblower documents. | ||
| This didn't come from the actual FBI, by the way. | ||
| These were whistleblower documents provided to Chuck Grassley and the Oversight Committee. | ||
| Whistleblower documents show the corrupt Biden FBI subpoenaed the bank records, donor lists, and emails of nearly every major conservative organization and leader in the country, including Donald Trump's campaign, the RNC, Conservative Partnership Institute, Save America PAC, America First Policy Institute, and even My Pillow, including InfoWars, Alex Jones, and everybody else involved. | ||
| A full-scale MAGA dragnet, totally weaponizing the FBI. | ||
| No underlying crime to predicate any of this on, carried out by Jack Smith, who had no right to serve in the role that he was appointed to. | ||
| The whole thing was a fraud. | ||
| They have to pay. | ||
| Support us at the AlexJonesStore.com, the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Get your ultramethylene red today. | ||
| And I'll see you tomorrow, folks, for Halloween. | ||
| It'll be Halloween tomorrow. | ||
| Huzzah! | ||
| We'll see you then. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever. | |
| The fight will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RioAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. | ||
| Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced. | ||
| Announcing, ladies and gentlemen, ultra-methylene red. | ||
| Now, this bottle is three times the size of an ultramethylene blue bottle because it's to have the formula, you got to have a lot more stuff in it. | ||
| But this, ladies and gentlemen, is amazing. | ||
| And it just came in yesterday. | ||
| I took it with the methylene blue. | ||
| Incredible workout today. | ||
| Clarity, focus. | ||
| It is so amazing. | ||
| So here it is, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| And it's available right now exclusively. | ||
| Limited first run. | ||
| A little more comes in in a month, but they got a limited run. | ||
| Chase, tell us about what is in Ultra Methylene Red. | ||
| So we are officially the first company through the Alex Jones store that's ever even invented or launched something like this called Methylene Red. | ||
| And just like you said, Alex, we have suppliers that we work with, manufacturers that we work with in Florida, Utah, Arizona, and other places. | ||
| We reached out to all of them and we asked them for a formula that would super enhance the effects of methylene blue, but also work as a standalone product. | ||
| I mean, just to give you an example, Alex, one of our best sellers when we were still operating the InfoWars store was Ultra 12. | ||
| And this has everything that Ultra 12 had in it. | ||
| 206,000% your daily value of vitamin B12 through methylcobalin. | ||
| So this is all backed by studies, by the way. | ||
| We looked very carefully into this. | ||
| The P5P, form of B6 that cranks out GABA, serotonin, and dopamine like a neurotransmitter factory. | ||
| It's got 5,000 micrograms of neurological B12 that regrows damaged nerve cells and shields your memory from the brain drain agenda from the globalist. | ||
| But this is the most impressive compilation of ingredients that I've ever seen in a supplement. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Batman, the back computer's picked up a transmission from Alex Jones, and he's holding some kind of red serum. | |
| Indeed, that appears to be ultramethylene red. | ||
| A powerful supplement. | ||
| Perhaps too powerful if it were to fall into criminal hands. | ||
| Only neurotransmitters, Batman. | ||
| What if the Riddler gets a hold of it? | ||
| He could outthink us for once. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Precisely why we must act swiftly, old chum. | |
| To the Batmobile. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There he is, Batman. | |
| What's fed, bottled, and drives your brain batty with brilliance? |
Export Selection