Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
InfoWars. | |
| Tomorrow's news. | ||
| Today. | ||
| Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the war room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live this Thursday afternoon. | ||
| Very glad to have you here with us. | ||
| We got a big show today. | ||
| Got a couple of big guests. | ||
| We'll be joined by Frank Wright in this first hour and then Jay Dyer in the second hour. | ||
| And I got to say, one of the greatest things about doing the war room now is I get to watch people on Alex's show and be sitting there hearing all the things they're talking about and going, you know, they'll touch on genetics. | ||
| I'm like, ooh, we'll expand on that later. | ||
| I get to revisit some of the topics that I hear touched on in the Alex Jones show. | ||
| We'll have Jay Dyer in and go a little bit deeper on some of those topics. | ||
| Very excited for that. | ||
| And then, of course, Frank Wright has some pretty interesting information about surrogacy and a lot of other stuff having to do with traditional Christian values. | ||
| So very excited to talk to him as well. | ||
| Stay tuned for all that, but we'll begin today, as you do every day, with our daily dispatch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, here it is, folks. | |
| Your daily dispatch for Thursday, the 23rd of October, 2025. | ||
| FBI raids NBA gambling ring tied to Italian mafia. | ||
| More than 30 people arrested, including Trailblazers coach Chauncey Billups and Heat's Terry Rosier, I guess. | ||
| FBI Director Cash Partel on Thursday announced the arrest of more than 30 people across 11 states, including the head coach of the Trailblazers and Miami Heat player Terry Rosier as part of a takedown of a massive sports gambling ring, which included a poker scheme and sports rigging. | ||
| So yes, folks, if you've ever been convinced that the professional sports that you were watching was somehow rigged because it's just impossible that your team does that at that moment, yeah, you're probably right, actually. | ||
| Yeah, no, everything's corrupt. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It all sucks. | |
| Meanwhile, Trump backs away from sending federal troops to San Francisco after pleas from tech leaders. | ||
| President Trump said Thursday he's calling off plans to deploy federal troops to San Francisco after speaking to the city's mayor and following backlash from the tech industry. | ||
| The federal government was preparing to surge San Francisco, California on Saturday, but friends of mine, this is Trump saying this, but friends of mine who live in the area called last night to ask me not to go forward with the surge in that the mayor, Daniel Lurie, was making substantial progress. | ||
| So, of course, it's the same case all over the country, whether Chicago or Portland or L.A. The only reason we send in federal troops is because the local officers are literally refusing to do their job and making everything less safe. | ||
| So if this is the solution, like I've been calling for every time we talk about this, every time we watch J.B. Pritzker, you know, pontificate. | ||
| I don't know if that's the right word. | ||
| He's the type of guy that doesn't ponte. | ||
| He bloviates, actually. | ||
| Bloviate is a better word for him. | ||
| Every time he bloviates about, you know, the horror of having federal agents sent to a city, it's like, well, the solution is just you take care of the crime, dummy. | ||
| So good. | ||
| It's good to see that, you know, San Francisco is like, oh, you're going to send troops? | ||
| Then I'll do it. | ||
| Then don't worry about it. | ||
| Then we'll take care of it. | ||
| We don't need to wait till dad gets home. | ||
| No, I'll just do it now. | ||
| Yeah, good. | ||
| You should be doing it already, traitors. | ||
| Meanwhile, Israel, quote, would lose all support from U.S. if it annexed West Bank, Trump warns, seemingly putting the kibosh on the Israel rights dream of applying sovereignty to parts of the West Bank. | ||
| U.S. President Donald Trump has said Israel will lose all support from the United States if it tries to move ahead with annexation, something that they're very much intent on doing. | ||
| And they're also bombing Lebanon to a very large degree right now. | ||
| And it's typical. | ||
| And we sort of knew this was going to happen because Israel's like a drug addict and their drug is war with their neighbors. | ||
| And they just, they can't kick it and they constantly need a new supply. | ||
| So yeah, as soon as they were sort of hamstrung in Gaza, they went to the West Bank. | ||
| And in fact, 71 settler attacks have been recorded in the West Bank in just the last week. | ||
| So no sign of slowing down. | ||
| But they're going to have to if they want to get support from America into the future. | ||
| Meanwhile, a legal immigrant truck driver charged with DUI killing three people in California crash. | ||
| This guy was released into the U.S. under Biden. | ||
| So another death at the hands of the Biden Open Border Brigade. | ||
| And finally, we have this. | ||
| IDF Strikes has bullet training camp in Lebanon with the IDF, again, bombing their neighbors because America supports them endlessly for some godforsaken reason. | ||
| That's your daily dispatch brought to you by thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Go to the alexjonesstore.com today. | ||
| Get your bovine colostrum plus or any of the incredible supplements. | ||
| Keep us on the air and in the fight far, far into the future. | ||
| Frank Wright on the other side. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, joined in studio by Frank Wright. | ||
| Frank Wright is a fearless journalist and commentator dedicated to reporting on the most critical issues facing Western civilization. | ||
| As a regular contributor to Lifeside News, his work focuses on the defense of life, liberty, and faith, exposing the powerful forces of cultural decay and globalism that threaten these foundational pillars. | ||
| You can find him on frankrider.com. | ||
| That's W-R-I-G-H-T-E-R.com. | ||
| Frank provides in-depth analysis and cuts to the noise of the mainstream media. | ||
| And you can follow him on X at Frank Ryder. | ||
| Frank, welcome to the show, sir. | ||
| Well, thank you for having me on. | ||
| Well, it's my pleasure. | ||
| And of course, you were on with Alex last week, I guess. | ||
| Was there just two days ago? | ||
| I can't even remember anymore, but you were on with you did an interview with Brianna as well. | ||
| And you're here to talk about surrogacy. | ||
| You call it America's National Disgrace. | ||
| What about surrogacy to you? | ||
| It's so objectionable. | ||
| Well, you see, the problem with surrogacy really is it's a very well-marketed and very lucrative international industry that's increasingly focused in the United States, which is the dominant market of surrogacy worldwide. | ||
| When you look behind it, it's basically an industry of evil. | ||
| The marketing is very slick. | ||
| It looks extremely altruistic. | ||
| They even use that word, but the more you look into it, the more evil you see. | ||
| And the reason why I should say, and it's a terrible thing to say that it's America's national disgrace, but it really is. | ||
| It's being increasingly criminalized and recognized as evil around the world. | ||
| And I would like to point out that that recognition of evil includes atheists, feminists, abortionists, liberals, left-wingers, the United Nations, and the European Union. | ||
| And it is embarrassing that discredited organizations such as these would be able to recognize evil, but the United States government would not. | ||
| There's currently no federal law governing surrogacy, and anyone from anywhere in the world can come to the United States and buy a baby, and they do, which is why the industry is booming in America. | ||
| So that's shocking. | ||
| I've looked into surrogacy a little bit. | ||
| I didn't realize there's no laws around it. | ||
| How could that possibly be the case? | ||
| I mean, that's crazy. | ||
| It did. | ||
| Look, a lot of the things that you say about this business just sound like baseless clickbait that you're going to say them just to get we know that we live in an information saturated age but the everything here is true and i do provide evidence for it there's an overview article that i've written on substack that says america's national disgrace surrogacy and it and it provides all the receipts why is it permitted like this there's no federal law governing it there's no federal position it's individually permission in states and | ||
| To be brief about it, this began in the 1990s. | ||
| There was a very foundational case in 1993 that basically asserted the rights of the commissioning parent, that's to say the people who buy the baby, to recognise that fertilised embryo or the baby as their property. | ||
| It is property law that governs these arrangements and it was established in 1993. | ||
| If that sounds astonishing, so the people who then organised these surrogacy agencies, which really began two years after this, about 1995, with circle surrogacy and people like John Weltman, they're lawyers as well and they went around states in the United States winning legal cases, commissioning this so widely that now there's only one state in America, which is Louisiana, in which it is criminal or illegal to do this. | ||
| Everywhere else you could do it. | ||
| That is shocking because, I mean, you're talking about, you're not, again, using clickbait or hyperbolic language and you say people are literally buying human beings. | ||
| If you want to look this up, there's the case of CM, capital C-M. | ||
| And CM, his name's been released, was the name of the man who commissioned the babies. | ||
| And I think this was around 2017. | ||
| This man was an American man and he decided to buy a baby from a woman through an agency. | ||
| And it's typical that the woman who gives birth to the baby, it's not called a mother, it's called a gestational carrier, doesn't meet the man concerned. | ||
| Now, this man turned out to be a single deaf man in his 50s living in his parents' basement with insufficient income or life skills or capability to look after children. | ||
| It gets worse. | ||
| She was implanted with three fertilized embryos in a typical procedure, but they all went live. | ||
| When the man found out she was going to have triplets, he demanded that she had an abortion. | ||
| And then he demanded that she had bought at least one of them. | ||
| And she started to get concerned. | ||
| She found out about his condition, about his life, about his state, the fact he was old, he was disabled, didn't have much money, and she was concerned he couldn't look after the babies. | ||
| To cut a long story short, because of these concerns, she had to give birth with an armed security guard on the hospital door. | ||
| She wasn't allowed to have anyone with her while she was cut open and the babies were taken out of her. | ||
| A screen was placed over her stomach. | ||
| They were immediately removed and transported to the buyer. | ||
| She tried to retrieve custody through the courts, and the judge told her what happens to those children afterwards is not the business of the court. | ||
| This man owns them. | ||
| That's the end of that. | ||
| The final nail in the coffin was that the Supreme Court refused to hear her case. | ||
| And so she couldn't get custody of the children. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| And okay, there's just so many things. | ||
| So when did that happen? | ||
| Was that in the 90s? | ||
| 2017 to 2019. | ||
| That was more recent. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| So did it start off this crazy or has it progressively gotten crazier? | ||
| How did this even come about? | ||
| What were the arguments that were made in favor of surrogacy to get this whole thing going in the first place? | ||
| Because as you're describing it, it's like, how would this ever be implemented? | ||
| But what was the argument to get this going in the first place that people bought into? | ||
| Well, you must remember that this, like many other industries, if you like, industries of death or evil, which is how I would describe it, is lucrative. | ||
| And so what you seek in that test case in 1993 is you seek to establish a legal precedent where it makes it easier for people to do this. | ||
| So you can, and if once you've established whose rights are what, once you've established that the buyer owns the fertilized embryo and the babies, and that the surrogate mother has no rights at all, then you have a clean transaction. | ||
| And then that can be, then you can go and legally permission that by test cases in other states. | ||
| And indeed, you can set up agencies to do this. | ||
| Circle surrogacy was founded by John Weltman, who is a homosexual man who had a homosexual male partner and wanted to have a baby. | ||
| And he found it very difficult, he said. | ||
| So two years after this test case, he set up Circle Surrogacy, which dealt exclusively to men like himself to supply babies to same-sex male couples. | ||
| It's now one of the biggest surrogacy agencies in the United States and has actually provided legal precedent and advice and pressure to, well, for example, Israel, a lot of his market came, was Israeli gay men coming to buy babies in the US. | ||
| But because of the lucrative nature of this market and his legal pressuring, industry pressuring, lobbying, partnered with the State Department in 2016, for example, the Israeli government legalized it in, I think, between 2019 and 22 when it was formally banned. | ||
| So now you can buy, if you're a homosexual man, you can buy babies in Israel as well, thanks to him. | ||
| And he's had a worldwide influence and has gone around the states, United States of America, as well as other leading surrogacy agents. | ||
| They're all lawyers and they all do this intentionally to build their markets. | ||
| Currently worth about $20 billion worldwide, but by 2034, it's supposed to be worth $200 billion. | ||
| Well, that's a compelling argument, I guess, to some people. | ||
| $200 billion. | ||
| It seems like, and maybe this is a little off topic, but it seems like something happened in the 90s because that was the same time that you had Dr. Kvorkian going around with killing people with his van, basically normalizing eugenics, which now we see it's like the number one cause of death in certain provinces in Canada, tens of thousands of people killed by the state in Canada. | ||
| They're trying to introduce it for mature minors. | ||
| I mean, it seems like something happened in the 90s that just all of these sort of, how did you put it, the death, you know, death culture, death industries came about. | ||
| And how has it taken this long for people to sort of see through what this really is? | ||
| And what do you think the connection is to like the eugenics program? | ||
| Is there one? | ||
| Well, to speak to the idea that there's a depopulationist agenda, that's certainly beyond debate. | ||
| There are published United Nations documents. | ||
| There's the Kissinger document. | ||
| There's the Club of Rome. | ||
| I think it's impossible to gainsay that. | ||
| As to how it gets permissioned, I mean, in the 1990s, and it's still quite successful now. | ||
| What you did then was that you presented these issues in a way that made people think that, in good faith, that you didn't really have a reasonable objection to it. | ||
| That really, it was morally wrong to prevent people. | ||
| Why would you want to prevent people having children? | ||
| Why would you want to prevent them having a family? | ||
| Why would you deny them that right? | ||
| And so this is actually how it was permissioned. | ||
| And in fact, Weltman gave a very revealing interview in about 2015, in which I think it was in the New York Times or something. | ||
| He said it was very difficult to get women to give birth to babies and then sell them to homosexual men before. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But he managed to go around and persuade them to do so. | ||
| And he said, now he boasted 80% of women are quite happy to do it. | ||
| Now, if you fast forward to, again, the United Nations report, we're taking moral lectures from the UN today. | ||
| That's how bad things are. | ||
| In July, their special rapporteur published a report and it investigated this change. | ||
| And it found that women had been coerced into this. | ||
| They'd been pressured, especially in the 90s, by saying that if they didn't do this, they were bad allies. | ||
| They should be allies of the rainbow people, of the LGBT people. | ||
| And if they weren't, they were bad people. | ||
| And that they should show solidarity and they should put their feelings aside. | ||
| So you have a coercive pressure group that partners with a kind of social revolution that basically tells you you're a bad person if you don't cooperate with things that are morally dubious or even evil. | ||
| And there's so much the hypocrisy abounds, I guess you could say, because what this does is literally turns women into baby-making machines. | ||
| Basically strips them of their humanity and just makes them the physical vessel by which a product is delivered. | ||
| I mean, it's dehumanizing at the utmost level. | ||
| And this obviously from the people on the left who will criticize people for being stay-at-home moms because you're just a baby, you know, a baby-making machine. | ||
| But it's like, no, this is actually turning them into just depersonalized, dehumanized delivery vessels for a product. | ||
| That's horrifying. | ||
| Well, they don't even call them women. | ||
| They never call them mothers. | ||
| They call them gestational carriers. | ||
| So in all the literature, in all the marketing, women are completely erased. | ||
| They're never called mothers. | ||
| They have no rights. | ||
| They have no rights of the children they produce. | ||
| There can be clauses, they're not legally enforceable, but there can be clauses in which the clients can insist on abortion, and they have done. | ||
| For example, where a girl's been produced and not a boy, or where they suspect birth defects. | ||
| Or there's a terrible case in America where a baby was born prematurely because the woman developed cancer. | ||
| And because she had to undergo a therapy, the baby had to be delivered prematurely. | ||
| And the two homosexuals who had commissioned the baby didn't want a premature baby. | ||
| And the upshot was that the baby died. | ||
| Well, maybe that's maybe a great argument for why women should be removed from the equation and we can just have mechanical delivery systems because that's a reality, right? | ||
| And it's actually been a reality for a while. | ||
| I was reading through some of the literature you provided. | ||
| And this has been going on since the 70s, artificial wombs? | ||
| Well, again, when you say these kind of things, people naturally, and when the tweet went up showing the interview that I did with Mr. Jones, people said, well, this is just nonsense. | ||
| But in fact, yes, in 1978, when the first IVF baby was produced in England, there were experiments then with animal wombs. | ||
| So non-human wombs, but artificial gestation. | ||
| And a Catholic priest at the time, who was rather poo-pooed, Newsweek did a report on this, and they said it could never happen in America. | ||
| And there was no future for this in the United States. | ||
| But this priest warned, he said, I foresee a future, a terrible future, in which women's wombs are rented to produce babies that will be modified genetically in some kind of nightmare eugenics program and they'll be reduced to commodities. | ||
| And that is exactly what's happening today. | ||
| At Duke University, there's a doctor who's pioneering a thing called Extend, which is said to be just for premature babies to gestate them in an artificial womb. | ||
| British Medical Journal said, yes, artificial wombs are coming. | ||
| Yes, they are. | ||
| In America in the summer, they published a scientific research paper showing that they created human eggs from male skin cells. | ||
| So you will not even need a woman to produce eggs. | ||
| You can create a human egg from human skin. | ||
| You can fertilize it in vitro, in a glass, in a laboratory, and then you'll be able to put it in a mechanical womb and gestate it. | ||
| And this is basically the automation of the production of human life. | ||
| Right, it's a brave new world. | ||
| Well, yes. | ||
| And in fact, the British Medical Journal's review of this near future actually mentions this. | ||
| And so do other reviews of technology because there's several strands of research that are producing these in the near future. | ||
| So the consensus is that they're coming, and that the lab production of human life is just over the horizon. | ||
| Oh man, and it's just it's like it's the type of thing that's like why do we even need to argue about this? | ||
| Like what type of person hears this and doesn't have a shiver go up their spine when they hear babies delivered in animal wombs or mechanical wombs. | ||
| I mean to me it just seems like something that I struggle to explain why this is bad because it seems so obvious. | ||
| It seems like you should have a visceral reaction to this, but people don't. | ||
| Is that just because of the marketing has been so successful in sort of concealing what this really is and putting it in nice flowery language? | ||
| Because again, it's just, how could anybody hear, you know, a baby gestating in an animal womb and not have a visceral reaction to that? | ||
| Are we the weird ones? | ||
| Like, how do you, how do you argue against something that seems so fundamentally evil on the face of it? | ||
| Do you know what I'm struggling with here? | ||
| Yeah, well, the thing is, I think, is that people honestly don't know. | ||
| And when they hear things like this, they must think, oh, it's just some kind of spurious, baseless internet claim. | ||
| Sci-fi. | ||
| But when people do hear about it and they do realize it's real, they're horrified. | ||
| I would like to give you a note of hope in that I've noted in trying to do this campaign to bring awareness of this and hopefully to end it, because I believe that that can be done. | ||
| If enough Americans speak out about this, if the Americans stop doing this, it's finished globally, really. | ||
| It is no future. | ||
| It can be stopped. | ||
| Why do I think that's possible? | ||
| Well, this is an issue which appeals to the basic recognition of evil and that goes far beyond any political or even religious boundaries or categories between people, atheists, believers, Christians, Catholics, left-wingers, liberals, progressives. | ||
| There's a broad coalition, if you like, an international moral majority who, despite their profound differences, can all recognize that this is basically evil and it must be stopped. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Which is a tremendous note of hope. | ||
| Well, it's evil to any number. | ||
| Like it's a crime against everybody involved almost, as far as I'm concerned, right? | ||
| It depersonalizes the mother, dehumanizes the mother by turning her into a vessel for a product, turns the kid into a product and deprives them of having a mother and a biological mother at that. | ||
| I mean, these are important. | ||
| These aren't just sort of optional things, right? | ||
| A child responds to its mother chemically. | ||
| It has needs that really a mother is best served. | ||
| And sure, if the mom dies or something, it doesn't mean the kid is going to die too. | ||
| It's like, okay, if the mother's not available, then you can try to make up for it, but you deliberately deprive a baby of its mother. | ||
| I mean, that's a crime against the child, as far as I'm concerned. | ||
| Well, what you've got to look at as well is that this is basically not just the reduction of human life to a consumer product, which it is, but it also presents a kind of existential threat to the family itself. | ||
| You are taking the marital act out of the creation of human life. | ||
| You are presenting a near future in which children can be produced without mothers at all. | ||
| And this is where you see the terrible permissioning of what people call bioethics, because every time technology presents some new man-made horror, you get these people coming along telling you how it's fine. | ||
| And the latest trend in what they call bioethics or the kind of morality of biology and technology is that what's the big deal of having genetically related parents? | ||
| Why do you need parents at all? | ||
| We don't really need parents. | ||
| We just need people who are going to nurture for and have the resources to take care of the products that they've bought. | ||
| This is genuinely something that really is positioned to annihilate the very concept of the family. | ||
| So anyone who thinks that having a family is a good idea should be concerned about this. | ||
| Well, it sort of goes along. | ||
| It just reminds me of some recent articles saying basically, if you have a family, that's an unfair advantage. | ||
| Not everybody has a family. | ||
| So if you do have a family, you're sort of, you know, de facto, you're privileged over other people that don't. | ||
| And that's a bad thing, obviously, because we all want. | ||
| So, I mean, the demonization of the family, it reminds me, I mean, in high school, reading 1984, Brave New World, there were parts of it that it was like, okay, this is just kind I remember the scene in 1984 where they're waving signs and then they act like, oh, the sign I made must have been made by an enemy and they start tearing up their own signs. | ||
| And I always thought, this is, you know, okay, humans can be controlled, but to a certain extent, this will never happen. | ||
| Same thing with Brave New World when they talk about, you know, mother and father are bad words. | ||
| And I remember reading that and thinking, okay, I mean, you know, some of this is good, but this is kind of far-fetched. | ||
| It's not that far-fetched, is it? | ||
| I mean, when you read Brave New World and they, you know, mother and father are considered a curse word or, you know, people are created as clones and then deliberately disabled with alcohol, you know, in their test tube to make them more compliant. | ||
| I mean, that stuff is really coming, isn't it? | ||
| I mean, if not already here. | ||
| Well, you should ask, why is that the case? | ||
| And that's because the family precedes the state. | ||
| It's older than the state. | ||
| It's made in the image of God. | ||
| It is the foundation of the nation, right? | ||
| It's a competitive explanatory and institutional power to government bureaucracy, to a one-world digital tyranny, if you like. | ||
| If you can undermine the family, then you can undermine one of the last bastions of human independence from tyranny or from state power, whether you like it or not. | ||
| And it goes alongside the deliberate subtraction of the divine from your life, and of divinity, of the presence of Christ and God in the world. | ||
| And it devalues your life and it cheapens your experience. | ||
| And it basically reduces you to a commodity. | ||
| And so if that's the case, if that's we're just going to live in this white, clean world where nothing has any essential value, not even human life, then really you can permission anything in that environment. | ||
| Then nothing's off the table and everything can be justified by some new bioethical jargon. | ||
| And I would like to point out how insidious this trade is because here's another shocking claim that you may hear from Katie Faust. | ||
| She's come up with the phrase that surrogacy is the paedophile's pathway to parenthood. | ||
| If you look that up on the Twitters, you'll see that she gives you five examples internationally, including in the United States, where that is strictly true. | ||
| What you are doing here is you are devaluing human life to the point where people without any background checks can come to America and buy children for any reason they wish and they do. | ||
| And it is commonplace. | ||
| And so that shocking claim turns out to be horrifyingly accurate. | ||
| It is. | ||
| And what is more, it is a very growing market. | ||
| And that is the reason why there are no background checks on people who come to the United States to buy children, whether they are single, coupled, or indeed thruppled, whether they are homosexual or transgender individuals. | ||
| And no one questions what they want the children for or what their future welfare status will be like. | ||
| It's just a transaction. | ||
| And that's taking place now. | ||
| And that's why the business is growing here, because it's been shut down in places like Italy, France, Slovakia, Greece, Albania, Russia, Vietnam, Cambodia, India. | ||
| Increasingly around the world, governments have realized we don't want people coming here and buying children and effectively trafficking them over borders for whatever reason. | ||
| I mean, you can see that this is a reality. | ||
| Child trafficking in the United States under the guise of surrogacy is a reality. | ||
| And you'd probably be aware of the horrendous story, and it is a shame to even mention it, of a convicted sex offender in the United States crowdfunding the purchase of a baby. | ||
| Right. | ||
| It's really beyond horrifying. | ||
| And it just seems like something has happened recently where all of these things, you know, luckily it seems like we're sort of clawing back from the edge. | ||
| But I feel the same way about transgenderism. | ||
| Just on the face of it, it's like, wait, they're buying babies or wait, they're castrating children. | ||
| Like, it's just, it's so crazy. | ||
| And yet they've been able to get this cross and convince people it's normal. | ||
| And now it seems like after a little bit, people wake up and go, wait, what are we doing? | ||
| Let's claw this back and let's stop this from happening. | ||
| It's crazy that it ever happened in the first place. | ||
| More with Frank Wright on the other side. | ||
| Remember, you can follow him on X at FrankRyder, FrankRyder.com as well. | ||
| That's W-R-I-G-H-T-E-R, FrankRyder.com. | ||
| More on the other side. | ||
| Harrowing topic. | ||
| We have videos to show you as well. | ||
| Stay with us. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| I'm joined today by Frank Wright. | ||
| You can follow him, and I encourage you to do so at X, on X, at Frank Ryder, and that's Frank, W-R-I-G-H-T-E-R. | ||
| So Frank Wright, Ryder. | ||
| I think that makes sense. | ||
| We're on radio a lot, so people can't see it on screen. | ||
| FrankRyder.com as well. | ||
| And, you know, we were just talking about how does IVF play into this? | ||
| I guess the way I'd like to approach this is probably for most normies, if they hear surrogacy, they think, oh, that's a wonderful thing. | ||
| If people can't have kids, then, you know, a woman can deliver the baby for them. | ||
| I mean, how could that be bad? | ||
| It's more babies. | ||
| It's more life. | ||
| It allows people who don't have an opportunity to be parents to actually have a child with their own genetics. | ||
| I mean, how can that be a bad thing? | ||
| What are the arguments that are made for this that people who haven't looked into it, they say, oh, somebody's against surrogacy? | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| Why would they be against that? | ||
| Well, what's the argument you would make to somebody like that who just doesn't know better? | ||
| Well, the reason why we're in this situation today is because I believe that most people are good people. | ||
| And when they hear these things, they believe what they're told about them. | ||
| They say, well, why would you want to deny someone the right to have a family? | ||
| That's a terrible thing to say. | ||
| Of course, it's just going to help people have children. | ||
| Who doesn't love children? | ||
| This is the way that the industry permissions its grave moral evil. | ||
| And I think that's an understatement when you find out the truth about it. | ||
| Why is that the case? | ||
| Because overwhelmingly, this is absolutely nothing to do with supplying children to childless couples who are infertile for no reason of their own, for no fault of their own. | ||
| The growth market is largely in LGBTQ couples, exceptionally. | ||
| And also, it is difficult to say how much of this market is to supply children for overseas customers, as in the two cases we saw this summer in the United States, because it is increasingly being shut down across the world because the United Nations and the European Union have recognized that it shares vital characteristics with human and child trafficking, which in fact is what it is in many cases. | ||
| So this is the reason why it's wrong. | ||
| I mean, if you don't object to children being sold to anonymous strangers across borders, then there's nothing to see here. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Again, that's the thing is it's like, when you actually understand it, how could you even argue for this? | ||
| So why is America lagging behind? | ||
| It probably has to do with money. | ||
| So what do we have to do to get over that? | ||
| What do we have to do to be like all of these other countries that have laws against us? | ||
| Why don't we have it? | ||
| Do we need a lobbying group? | ||
| Like, what do we need to do to put a stop to this here in America? | ||
| I think it can be stopped, and it is being stopped worldwide. | ||
| And there's an increasing call worldwide for it to be banned worldwide. | ||
| I mean, for example, if you look at what the government of Italy have done, they've banned it in all its forms because basically they've recognized it is a crime to sell children. | ||
| Bear in mind, it is fundamentally about selling children. | ||
| Now, in some countries, they'll say, oh, it's only altruistic surrogacy, meaning that you can only give gifts to the surrogate or the gestational carrier. | ||
| But in fact, that is just paying them. | ||
| And the law is seldom enforced. | ||
| So basically, wherever it's permitted, it is a commercial exchange to purchase a young life. | ||
| And it usually doesn't satisfy the presumed characteristics on which the surrogacy agencies trade. | ||
| It's usually not a case of a poor man and a poor woman who can't have children of their own. | ||
| It's usually very little to do with that. | ||
| And I'll tell you how insidious it is. | ||
| In somewhere like the United Kingdom or Australia, where you are not allowed to pay directly, you're not allowed to do what's called commercial surrogacy. | ||
| You've got to pretend and indirectly pay them by buying them expensive gifts and so on. | ||
| Or you can travel abroad and buy a baby in the United States. | ||
| There's nothing wrong with that, apparently. | ||
| But they're going to try, the industry's trying to get legal permission for commercial surrogacy. | ||
| And the way they're doing this is they came up with a new phrase called socially infertile people. | ||
| Now, don't you feel sorry for people who are socially infertile? | ||
| Now, I'm going to give you a guess. | ||
| Your starter for 10 is, what do you think they really mean when they talk about people who are socially infertile? | ||
| Well, a couple options. | ||
| I doubt they're advocating for the incels. | ||
| I doubt they're advocating for the involuntary celibate. | ||
| So I'm going to go with the rainbow people. | ||
| Is that choosing lifestyles that it's not about providing an opportunity for children for people who are basically infertile heterosexual couples? | ||
| It's about including in that definition basically men. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Men who are partnered with men or men who dress up as women. | ||
| And so that's what this situation is. | ||
| And the reason why that's taking place, this is not propaganda, is because that section of society typically has a lot of money to spend because they don't have children. | ||
| And therefore, they have the kind of money to spend, which in the United States can be around $200,000 per child. | ||
| Very lucrative industry. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| To buy babies. | ||
| Now, if you are a government and you want to make more revenue, this is a very lucrative industry with very little input and has very little oversight. | ||
| The overheads are very low. | ||
| Profit margins are very high. | ||
| It looks very progressive. | ||
| And you can tell people who don't really understand it that all you're doing is providing a pathway to parenthood for people who otherwise denied it for socially infertile reasons. | ||
| Socially infertile. | ||
| You know, it is, it's the jargon, isn't it? | ||
| I mean, they're so good with words, they can come up with something like socially infertile and people will just accept it and just go, oh, yeah, that makes sense. | ||
| They're infertile, but because of the choice. | ||
| I mean, it's jargon. | ||
| In all honesty, you should show them a picture of Bruce Jenner whenever you use that phrase. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That's what you mean by socially infertile. | ||
| But it really is about manipulation of language, isn't it? | ||
| You know, I think back to when they say gender-affirming care. | ||
| Oh, dude. | ||
| Right. | ||
| But it's very sophisticated. | ||
| It's very sort of it's hard to argue against a phrase like that. | ||
| It's gender-affirming care. | ||
| What they mean is castration. | ||
| But when you call it, or they, or they're, you know, for abortion, they'll say women's health care. | ||
| Or actually now they say abortion care, right? | ||
| If you add the word care on it, suddenly it's not an abortion. | ||
| I mean, it's, but it's all about the words, isn't it? | ||
| How do they use words and why is that such a successful strategy for them? | ||
| Well, because if you look at how government was developed in the liberal democratic system, which was invented in the 1920s, it would basically replace the policeman's baton with a form of propaganda. | ||
| People who wrote that about propaganda, people like Walter Lippmann and Freud's nephew, Edward Bernays. | ||
| Edward Bernay said things like marketing, public relations, advertising, propaganda, they're all the same thing. | ||
| He said it was called applied psychoanalysis. | ||
| Now, what does that mean? | ||
| It means you use fancy words that appeal to people's feelings that make them feel good when they imagine or say those words, and then you attach them to symbols or industries or businesses or political policies. | ||
| And so when people say or imagine these things, they feel good about themselves, even if that thing, especially if that thing, is not actually good at all, especially when it's very bad or evil. | ||
| So you apply these ideas to these things. | ||
| You say, pardon me, this is gender-affirming care, or you've got the right to die. | ||
| Who would deny you the right to die? | ||
| That's another deaf industry. | ||
| If you're saying to people, well, look, we're going to prescribe suicide as a form of health care, people would be outraged. | ||
| But if you repackage it as the right to die, if you repackage it as access to parenthood for the socially infertile, then that sounds like a good thing to support. | ||
| And you would feel bad for saying no to it. | ||
| So yes, it is intentionally manipulative, but this is the basis of marketing. | ||
| And the 20th century was about selling you a God. | ||
| In fact, selling you a God, any God, but actually God himself. | ||
| So you come to believe in these things, these progressive ideas, you come to infuse them with a religious fervor where it's been deliberately subtracted from Christ and re-injected into things like the rainbow flag or the net zero agenda or open borders or all the progressive policies of social revolution that all seem to be destructive in some way, destructive to human dignity, to the family, to the nation, and ultimately to your sanity. | ||
| And when you are in that state of vulnerability, when everything has been confused and destroyed, this is the opportunity for where, well, oh, look, we can provide you with some order. | ||
| We can provide you with meaning. | ||
| We can provide you with slogans for basically marketed evil that will give you a momentary sense of satisfaction. | ||
| And then you'll be ever more accepting of these things because you're made desperate because of everything that's been subtracted from your life. | ||
| You know, I think we live in a one of the things about the liberal global system that people overlook is that it intentionally was designed to replace everything with itself, everything past, present, and future, with itself. | ||
| And it's partnered with a form of consumer nihilism. | ||
| So when you look at it, you might not really understand the magnitude of what it means to reduce human life to a product, but think about it. | ||
| Think about how much of the stuff on the supermarket shelves is just trash, toxic trash, not even food. | ||
| Think about human life being placed upon that shelf. | ||
| There's no category anymore between the things that you buy and dispose of when you're finished and babies and the elderly and us. | ||
| And once you've achieved that, then there's really no limit to what you can do in terms of human degradation. | ||
| And it's interesting you mentioned the transgender movement because there's been those two surveys that showed that the trans wave has peaked. | ||
| And there's been a dramatic falloff in younger people identifying as gender flux and so on. | ||
| And these are adjacent or contiguous industries. | ||
| They are transhuman. | ||
| It was a woman called Bilek, who it was a feminist, there's a lot of feminists have pioneered work campaigning, really successful work against the trans wave, World War T, and against this, against surrogacy. | ||
| It's been feminists, like Bilek, who wrote a book called Transsexual, Transgender, Transhuman. | ||
| And it's a collection of essays that came out a couple of years ago, and she was extremely severely attacked for these things, vehemently. | ||
| The industry mobilized against her, but she was correct in saying that it is a transhuman cult masquerading as a civil rights movement. | ||
| So there again, you see the insidious packaging of something profoundly dubious and even evil. | ||
| Something overtly satanic in many cases. | ||
| But it's presented as an aspirational liberationist movement of human rights. | ||
| And so therefore, you're a bad person if you oppose the progress of evil. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And there's so many things like that. | ||
| In Canada, they call the assisted suicide medical assistance in dying made. | ||
| You can even think of social things like Black Lives Matter, where who would say Black Lives Don't Matter? | ||
| You would never. | ||
| How dare you oppose that? | ||
| So by sloganeering in this, or Antifa, that's the latest one, right? | ||
| Oh, if you're against Antifa, that means you're a fascist. | ||
| You love fascists. | ||
| I mean, it's word games people play, and it's strange more people can't see through it because it seems so blatant, especially when they do things like abortion care or gender affirming care. | ||
| And it's like they're just disguising the reality. | ||
| And that's really what it is, isn't it? | ||
| There's a fight against the real and the delusions of these people who really see themselves as God. | ||
| And that idea of transhumanism has definitely percolated, or I don't know if that's the right word, but maybe dripped down to the lower levels. | ||
| I was talking to somebody about transgenderism and they said, well, you know, we're all transitioning into gods. | ||
| You know, they're like, what? | ||
| Humanity itself is transitioning into a new thing. | ||
| So this mindset has already been inculcated into people's minds, even if they're not at the high level involved in sort of the satanic occultish stuff. | ||
| There are people on the ground that are going along with this and think it's a good thing. | ||
| Well, yeah, you are encouraged generally by this kind of mass culture to be trans sane in every area of your life, right? | ||
| And apparently, if you are visibly sane, if you're reliably sane, you're a balanced, sane, decent human being, you call you a nutter. | ||
| So you're a madman. | ||
| Now, why have we got, how have we got here? | ||
| A man that I mentioned to you just now, Walter Lippmann, who effectively helped to design the liberal democratic system. | ||
| He was a founding member of the Council on Foreign Relations. | ||
| He wrote a book called Public Relations, and he said in a 1919 essay in The Atlantic that the basic problem of democracy was that people were apt to think what they thought about the world. | ||
| And we couldn't have that. | ||
| So we have to create public opinion. | ||
| And what that really means is the manufacturer of mass belief. | ||
| And he said, in order to manufacture consent, it was he who came up with that phrase. | ||
| All you had to do was create a pseudo-environment in people's minds. | ||
| Through the uses of images and mass media and radio and advertising, you would present a false picture of the world to people. | ||
| And you can manipulate that because you're in charge of the cultural production of the images in people's heads. | ||
| And so for a century, for 100 years, people in the West have been saturated with cultural propaganda, which is basically everything that you consume in your media, your news, your thought leaders, your art, your popular music, your entertainment is in some dimension a form of propaganda for the liberal system. | ||
| And it's intentionally designed to replace Christ at the center of Christianity and to supply political beliefs there instead. | ||
| And this is the reason why people cop for it, because that technique was invented 100 years ago, but it's been systematically and continually refined ever since. | ||
| And it's deployed deliberately in a subtle way so that you don't notice it, right? | ||
| I remember, I remember being a kid and seeing, you know, I was watching some show and there's a woman, she's, you know, they say, oh, won't you have a kid? | ||
| And she says, oh, well, like, I'd want a parasite, you know, wriggling its way out from between my legs. | ||
| And it's like, what a disgusting way to talk about it. | ||
| But this was just a sitcom on, you know, ABC or whatever. | ||
| But it's planting in your mind, you know, natural birth is disgusting. | ||
| It's gross. | ||
| It's unnatural. | ||
| And it's all sort of in the same line. | ||
| And it's bizarre because you do have this like they're depopulating the earth, but then they're using this weird, you know, surrogacy program where they're creating life. | ||
| So that would seem contradictory, but it's all really in the same movement. | ||
| And so it's not so much about hating and wanting to destroy humans outright. | ||
| It's wanting to, in this weird, almost inverted way, elevate humanity above nature. | ||
| But it's kind of hard. | ||
| It's just hard for me to kind of contend with because it's just so unnatural and they want to elevate people. | ||
| But the way they do that is by dragging us down into the mud and they want to kill everybody. | ||
| And they think natural birth is disgusting, but then they're advocating for surrogacy. | ||
| So it's just really about just like disconnecting humanity with reality in a fundamental way that, again, it's hard for me to enunciate because it just, it seems like something you have to either understand. | ||
| You either understand it or you don't. | ||
| You either get how bizarre and unnatural and perverted this all is, or you're just not paying attention. | ||
| So again, just getting back to the question at the beginning of this, for the people that, again, just go, these people, they just don't like gay people. | ||
| That's why. | ||
| They must be bigots for thinking this. | ||
| What is your 10-second pitch? | ||
| Just go, here's what you don't know about surrogacy. | ||
| What are some of the really crazy facts that people, once they hear it, really can't go along with this? | ||
| Well, really, I just ask you to bear in mind one sentence from the UN report. | ||
| The sale of children is a crime. | ||
| Apart from that, especially given what we said about the technique of control of the 20th century, be very, very suspicious when people tell you that something is good. | ||
| Because the complexity of this situation can be collapsed in a simple observation. | ||
| Everything that they tell you is good for you is actually bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And everything that's really, really bad, they tell you is good. | ||
| You can call that moral inversion, but that is a simple guide to that. | ||
| So when you see a highly sophisticated marketing campaign that presents something in soft, focused, aspirational tones, and it's a wonderful, uplifting message for humanity, this is when you should start to think there's a smell of sulfur in the room and listen carefully for the echoing laughter of Satan. | ||
| Right, absolutely. | ||
| And you have so much information about this and documentation about this that again, if people are interested and actually want to find out, if they want to try to disprove Mr. Wright here, they're welcome to go look at the data. | ||
| And some of this is wild. | ||
| This chart here from this document package, which I assume a lot of this can be found at your substack, which again is frankrider.com. | ||
| And that goes to your substack, right? | ||
| FrankRyder.com. | ||
| So explain this chart to us. | ||
| This is surrogacy market by type. | ||
| 2021, it's two. | ||
| Is this $2 trillion USD? | ||
| I mean, that seems insane, but is that how... | ||
| Oh, no, the market by type to 2034, USD billion would be the worldwide market is estimated to go between 200 and around, you know, $230 billion by 2034, right? | ||
| So enormous growth. | ||
| And if you look at the shading on these bars, you can see there's a tiny little blue line at the top. | ||
| That tiny little blue line is the number of babies, surrogate babies, delivered by what you would call natural surrogacy. | ||
| But the overwhelming volume of surrogate babies are delivered by IVF, which is where an embryo is created outside the body of the surrogate. | ||
| And the woman carrying it, which they never call a mother, which is disgraceful, has no genetic relation to the baby at all. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So natural surrogacy, which you almost can't even tell just because our printer was running out of ink or something, but there's just a little sliver at the very top. | ||
| And so that would be somebody who is carrying somebody else's baby, but was naturally gestated, naturally conceived inside the body rather than IVF. | ||
| The crossover of IVF is a little bit weird here because I have to admit, I'm a fan of IVF. | ||
| I like IVF because I know most of my friends, and just as a consequence of the natural world, could not conceive naturally. | ||
| And a lot of them had to do IVF. | ||
| And I have trouble looking at their children and saying, you know, this is evil. | ||
| But when IVF is being used this way, I mean, that's horrifying. | ||
| How does IVF interact with this topic? | ||
| Because, again, a lot of people against it. | ||
| Obviously, if it's used this way, it's horrible. | ||
| But I think it's in a lot of ways kind of a miracle technology. | ||
| How does that play with this? | ||
| Does the political nature of IVF interact with this, give it protection or make it more difficult? | ||
| How does IVF interact with this? | ||
| The reason the IVF market is even bigger than the surrogacy market. | ||
| It is enormously, it's enormously valuable market, billions and billions of dollars. | ||
| Now, you can look into why that's been the case. | ||
| Why are so many people waiting later in life to have children so they're infertile and so they have to revort to that? | ||
| Because basically the Western economy has made it practically impossible for you to afford to have a family. | ||
| There are policies such as in Hungary, it's been long established, or recently in Poland, where if you have more than two children, you will get a complete income tax rebate. | ||
| You pay no income tax. | ||
| They will actually prohibit the lobbying and permissioning of LGBTQ alternative or novel family structures. | ||
| And they'll favor what we are regrettably compelled to call the traditional family instead. | ||
| Now, you can change policy to make it more possible for people to have children, but for it not to be an impossible dream, like it is for many young Americans to own a home to raise them in. | ||
| And you can also look at what are the environmental factors that cause infertility. | ||
| Perhaps we shouldn't be drinking polluted water and eating toxic trash as well. | ||
| Perhaps we should be looking at that instead of an industry that is itself, as a Catholic for me, is a grave insult to human life because most people don't know that it destroys more human lives, perhaps twice as many every year as abortion. | ||
| Because for every fertilized embryo, which is the goal of IVF, you may create up to 11 or 12 of them, most of which are just flushed down the toilet, thrown in the bin. | ||
| Or in some cases, they're frozen. | ||
| And now you have bioethicists telling you that, oh, no, we shouldn't waste them. | ||
| Why don't we just sell them to someone else? | ||
| And of course, why not? | ||
| Because you've turned human life into a lab-grown commodity. | ||
| And then that has a market value. | ||
| And again, the overheads are very good because all you need is a fridge and a distribution system. | ||
| And then you can make a lot of money, perhaps $200,000, from selling a human life. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Well, we know that abortion, one of the reasons they're pushing for later and later abortions is because they sell the body parts of the babies they abort. | ||
| So the more developed it is, the more valuable it is. | ||
| It's the disgusting hidden reason why they always clamor for later and later abortions up to nine months because it's actually more valuable to sell the child that way. | ||
| So I guess with IVF, the way you're describing, it's almost like it's like you're putting a band-aid on a cancer, right? | ||
| The cancer is the poisons and the economic situation and just the lack of fertility overall. | ||
| Instead of solving that problem at its root, we're trying to cover up the effects of the problem, which is really just creating more problems. | ||
| How do we get to the point, right? | ||
| How do you call it a successful, thriving democracy or a nation to be proud of where it is an impossible dream for young people in Britain and America to think of starting a family and having a home of their own to live in them? | ||
| You know, why? | ||
| How did we get to this point? | ||
| How can this be possible? | ||
| This a couple of generations ago. | ||
| Some people point out that look at Homer Simpson. | ||
| He didn't even go to college and look how many kids he's got on the sides of his house. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Well, that was real. | ||
| Looks like another planet. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You know, it's ridiculous. | ||
| You know, the American dream now is living in your mother's basement and going mad on the internet. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And it's happened very quickly and they tell you not to question it. | ||
| And it seems like the purpose of a state, I mean, that's the fundamental thing, right? | ||
| You want to be able to create an, you know, when you say traditional, a traditional family structure, that's almost a misnomer, isn't it? | ||
| Because the traditions that we stick to aren't just some sort of superstition, you know, that we're just sticking to because we've been brainwashed into a cult. | ||
| This is the best way to do things. | ||
| It's a tradition because it's been through trial and error. | ||
| We've established a mother and a father being married for life and raising their own children in their own home. | ||
| That is the ideal condition for raising happy, healthy, successful humans. | ||
| And that's what's being destroyed because they just claim, oh, it's all, this is all just, you know, sort of bigoted and prejudiced and superstitious. | ||
| But no, it's a tradition because through trial and error, humanity discovered this is the greatest way to do things. | ||
| And that's what they don't want you to know. | ||
| If you read, and I suggest you read a little bit of it, a 1930s book by Wilhelm Reich, who was a psychoanalyst in the Sigmund Freud School. | ||
| It's called The Mass Psychology of Fascism. | ||
| Briefly, he diagnoses fascism as being produced in traditional families. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So what we would call families or normal families. | ||
| But to him, this is a factory of little fascists. | ||
| And the cure, he said, was sexualizing mothers and children. | ||
| Sexualizing women and children to liberate them from family ties. | ||
| And he says it seven times in the book, sexually liberate children. | ||
| Well, and that's something I always point out about the Kintler experiment, which I know you and Alex talked about, which was the in Germany where they gave children to pedophiles. | ||
| And you ask, why would they do that? | ||
| And the reason was because the guy who put on the study was an anti-fascist. | ||
| His father was a Nazi. | ||
| He hated his father. | ||
| And he connected sort of sexual purity and moral, you know, righteousness as connected as a pathway to fascism. | ||
| So it was actually they carried out that experiment where they gave children to pedophiles to defeat fascism. | ||
| But you can see that the construct of fascism that's being used here is basically a description of normal family life. | ||
| I think it's important to stress that point. | ||
| That a man who is clearly a deranged sexual pervert is diagnosing normal life as a pathological condition that must be wiped out by making children and women sexually immoral. | ||
| This is another dimension of the war on the family. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Wow, we could go on and on forever. | ||
| Thank you so much for being with us. | ||
| FrankWright, everybody, FrankRider.com. | ||
| You guys remember when Cobra took over television in G.I. Joe episode The Wrong Stuff? | ||
| Roadblock tries to tune into the news, but every channel has been replaced by Cobra Television Network. | ||
| This is the Cobra Television Network. | ||
| The first show has a very clear message to the viewer. | ||
| Don't trust anybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I could be your neighbor. | |
| The next show is Cobra's rip-off of the A-Team. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Since the C team, starring Mr. C! | |
| I pity the fool that doesn't join Cobra. | ||
| I pity him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a joke, right? | |
| Videotape. | ||
| No, Shereeba, Duke. | ||
| That's real TV. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All the channels are like that. | |
| Next, the Joes watch a televised interview with Cobra Commander. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So when did you first discover you wanted to rule the world? | |
| I was six when I realized I could run society better than the morons who were in charge. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That old, huh? | |
| Slow learner, I guess. | ||
| This new era in television is only the beginning. | ||
| Cobra! | ||
| We also see a Cobra ripoff of King Kong with another explicit message for the viewer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can never win if your enemy is bigger and stronger than you. | |
| Cobra Commander explains how he altered the ending of the movie and how he will use the medium of television for propaganda. | ||
| You changed the ending? | ||
| Yes, to promote Cobra's social philosophy. | ||
| Baroness is skeptical about how this is possible. | ||
| How was this accomplished? | ||
| Computers, of course. | ||
| Voice and picture synthesis. | ||
| Amazing. | ||
| Cobra plans to hide from the Joes and beam their programs to their satellites to avoid interference. | ||
| Because G.I. Joe will never find us here. | ||
| And we can beam our programs to our satellite with no interference. | ||
| Cobra Commander then explains how television is the ultimate weapon of control because people trust it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would feel more secure if the Joe's activities were under control. | |
| You lack imagination, Destro. | ||
| We possess the ultimate weapon of control. | ||
| People trust television. | ||
| It's their friend. | ||
| They believe what television tells them about the news, the weather, or G.I. Joe. | ||
| Don't you see? | ||
| We control the creation of trust. | ||
| We see a Cobra-produced children's show that promotes conformity. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, G-likables! | |
| Nobody likes me! | ||
| That's because you're different, Poopey. | ||
| Only when everybody looks alike and excellent and thinks alike and never ever gets angry can we achieve world peace? | ||
| Tune in next week for more pro-social fun with the likables. | ||
| Then Cobra Commander sings and dances after his latest plan is going well. | ||
|
unidentified
|
La-dee-da-da-da-da-da. | |
| Da-da-da-dee-da-da! | ||
| It's mine, you know. | ||
| Totally mine! | ||
| Cobra Commander asks the viewers for donations and even lists their P.O. box. | ||
| But G.I. Joe, they try again to deprive you of your viewing pleasure. | ||
| We have fortified our defenses, but the price of vigilance is high. | ||
| Help keep Cobra on the air by sending a generous contribution to this address. | ||
| Cobra Commander interrupts a football game to advertise Cobra and G.I. Joe's upcoming battle in space. | ||
| Put me back on the air immediately. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And Varley's headed for the end zone. | |
| Hello, sports fans. | ||
| You're about to witness some real excitement. | ||
| Live and direct from space. | ||
| A game of life and death between G.I. Joe and Cobra. | ||
| At the end of the episode, Mr. C shows up and asks G.I. Joe for a job. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's what I can do for you. | |
| I'm mean. | ||
| I'm bad. | ||
| And I'm out of work. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You got any openings in G.I. Joe? | |
| Numerous plot devices from this episode arguably aged well, such as using computer and television for propaganda, the concept of voice and picture synthesis, using satellites to broadcast content, and crowdfunding Cobra TV. | ||
| What do you guys think? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live forever. | |
| The fight will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RioAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. | ||
| Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Guest in studio, Jay Dyer. | ||
| He's an author, comedian, TV presenter known for his deep analysis of Hollywood geopolitics and culture. | ||
| Of course, you all know that already. | ||
| If you don't know it, you can go to jsanalysis.com. | ||
| That's jsanalysis.com. | ||
| He's on YouTube at Jay Dyer, and he's on X at J underscore D 007 Double O7. | ||
| And you got to get the whole name. | ||
| I just tried to tag you, Jay, in a post, and I had to type out all the way to J underscore D zero. | ||
| And then it went, oh, this is the guy you mean. | ||
| You're still shadow banned to some degree, aren't you? | ||
| Probably. | ||
| I mean, there was at one point where it was like straight up shadow band, you couldn't find me at all. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And then it kind of went away after like a week or two. | ||
| So. | ||
| Well, you're there now. | ||
| And I was really enjoying, you know, you and Alex's conversation because it was just sort of a freewheeling discussion about all sorts of stuff. | ||
| And I thought one of the interesting things y'all touched on is the persistence of like Scottish people in rebellious activity and how it just seems to be a part of the nature of Scottish people. | ||
| And, you know, you look at the Texas Revolution, the American Revolution, Canada was mostly settled by Scots. | ||
| There's something about this, the Celtic strain that sort of bucks under restrictions. | ||
| What do you draw from that? | ||
| And what do you think the importance of that is and just the way things unfold across the world? | ||
| Well, we're not inbred. | ||
| So it doesn't slow us down with Slowboy IQ. | ||
| So some groups do that. | ||
| Some Middle Eastern groups do that. | ||
| That kind of slows down things. | ||
| But, you know, some of the elite writings, there's one I didn't bring with me, which is Charles Galton Darwin's book, The I forget the title, The Next Million Years. | ||
| And that when he talks about the genetic heritage of European peoples, of British Isle people, Scottish peoples, Irish people, etc. | ||
| And in that, he says that these people are probably the toughest to control because they kind of just have maybe through the environment, you know, living in those climates that kind of, you know, epigenetically kind of, you know, through a microevolution way, you could say, prepared them for very difficult scenarios and a lot of warfare and that kind of stuff. | ||
| So I think we're a tough people. | ||
| You can see, like, I still got the red hair here. | ||
| But yeah, we're a tough people. | ||
| Some people even speculate there's this gene that's responsible for that kind of like both madness and like genius. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And the Scottish people do that name for it. | ||
| I forget the name of that gene. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, it's a fascinating theory. | ||
| But regardless, like many of these texts say explicitly that Western white European peoples and their religion have to be subverted. | ||
| And that's what we're undergoing right now. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And this, I mean, it's, this is an established fact. | ||
| I mean, this goes back. | ||
| You can read, you know, Julius Caesar's writings. | ||
| And, you know, he had a lot of trouble with the Germans because they have this proclivity to, you know, you can't just order them to do something. | ||
| I remember reading a Roman general at some point. | ||
| And he, you know, the Romans, you just say, go do this and they go do it. | ||
| The Germans, you had to explain why they're doing it. | ||
| You had to explain what they're going to get for doing it. | ||
| They weren't just going to follow orders outright. | ||
| And then, of course, Julius Caesar obviously failed to conquer Britain and they never really got all the way up to Scotland. | ||
| They ended up just building Hadrian's Wall after a couple hundred years of trying. | ||
| But the reason was because Britain was this generator of conflict against the Romans, right? | ||
| It was this sort of, you know, I think about it like a video game where you've got all the monsters coming out of the doorway and you have to go destroy the doorway or else the monsters are going to keep coming. | ||
| So, you know, and they would, they would say, you know, people would be sent to Britain to study, you know, under these occult practices in the same way that, you know, a lawyer might be sent to Rhodes to become a scholar. | ||
| So, you know, Britain was this headquarters of sort of this Celtic religion that constantly was rebelling against Rome. | ||
| And so they were like, we're never going to have peace until we destroy the source. | ||
| And I don't think they ever got to the source. | ||
| Yeah, well, they're trying that now, right? | ||
| So the source is, you know, I believe in the soul of a people. | ||
| If you read, you know, somebody like Oswald Spangler, who was very critical of Hitler, very critical of the Reich, and was eventually, I think he had to leave Germany because he thought Hitler was a tiny, tiny little man. | ||
| But he's, you know, considered a right-winger and considered kind of one of those historicist thinkers that classifies everything in terms of like cycles. | ||
| And the Western peoples, he said, would be subverted by the other nations taking over their technology. | ||
| In other words, the liberal socialist ethos of liberal Christianity would be the undoing of the Western peoples. | ||
| And that would allow the other people groups that aren't necessarily enemies, but that would be imported to kind of take over. | ||
| And he said this would be the fate, although he was not for it. | ||
| The Tavistock Institute actually studied Spangler's decline of the West to figure out how to weaponize it. | ||
| Other texts talk about weaponizing this kind of stuff too. | ||
| Tavistock text, this text right here talks about similar ideas. | ||
| But basically, you have to destroy the individual idea of sovereignty and building your own life and family and business. | ||
| All that has to be destroyed to put you into a collectivist mindset. | ||
| And one of the key ways that we don't talk about a lot is just guilt, like using guilt, saying that you're guilty for your ancestors' colonialism. | ||
| There's a great chapter in here that says, it's kind of funny. | ||
| Like Margaret Mead, who's kind of a fraud, Margaret Mead says, oh, you gave people, you know, clothing and they couldn't wear grass skirts anymore. | ||
| So you made them want stuff. | ||
| Right. | ||
| That's why, what she says, like the stupidest argument, only academics could believe an argument that retarded, right? | ||
| But that's why colonialism is bad. | ||
| So yeah, you might have raised everybody's living centers and saved lives with medicine, but you're bad because they don't have grass skirts anymore. | ||
| So greed is somehow bound up with the idea of raising people groups. | ||
| And I'm pro-colonialism. | ||
| I think nobody should feel guilt for their ancestors bringing civilization. | ||
| Think about speaking of Mel Gibson, Apocalypto. | ||
| That's the whole point of Apocalypto is, don't you think those guys were happy when they saw the Spanish coming and like they're running from this giant human sacrifice cult? | ||
| They see like the Spanish coming. | ||
| It's like, oh, maybe they'll help us. | ||
| Yeah, it's fascinating. | ||
| And, you know, obviously the British were just exceptional when it came to colonialism. | ||
| And just you see how widespread the sort of British diaspora went. | ||
| And, you know, I guess, you know, the world wars is the obvious answer, but like, how did they lose it? | ||
| How did it go so wrong so fast? | ||
| Because when you had from Australia to South Africa to America, I mean, this was an Anglo world for a while. | ||
| And there were some very good consequences from that. | ||
| But then ever since World War II, it's just like it hasn't just collapsed. | ||
| It's gone the other way. | ||
| It's like now the white people are just being driven out of everywhere, including their own homelands. | ||
| Like, how did it go so wrong so fast? | ||
| Even though, like, we're supposedly colonialists as not our land, but then it's wrong if we don't want other people coming to colonize our land. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| So it makes no sense. | ||
| Nothing on the left makes any sense. | ||
| That's on purpose, by the way. | ||
| But one of the books I've been covering for many years is Johan Ratheo's amazing book, The Milner-Fabian Conspiracy. | ||
| It's a geopolitical historical espionage text. | ||
| It's not really a conspiracy text. | ||
| He just kind of goes from a lot of the same books. | ||
| And there's a great chapter that hits on what you're talking about about the OSS and CIA psychological warfare and mind control operations that many people don't know about that we, the U.S., did against Germans. | ||
| So, and I'm not, again, I'm very conspiratorial when it comes to the narrative of World War II. | ||
| I think that Hitler played a role in helping to create the dialectic that would lead to the establishment of the nation state of Israel. | ||
| You couldn't have today's 1948 recognition without what Hitler did. | ||
| So that's a different topic. | ||
| But there's a chapter where it says that the OSS really went deep into studying the German psyche. | ||
| And again, I'm not backing up Hitler. | ||
| I'm against Hitler. | ||
| I think he was a bad guy. | ||
| He was an antichrist in the Orthodox Christian perspective. | ||
| But it's not accidental that after World War II, the OSS set up all of these propaganda operations in Germany to make sure that Germans would never tap into their native strength, the soul of that people, to become an engineering powerhouse like they were before World War II. | ||
| So they actually psyoped them into being farmers and stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| of weird. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And I was not that it's wrong to be a farmer, but they just didn't want him to be warlike. | ||
| Well, they didn't want them to reach their potential and then be designers of their own destiny. | ||
| And I was watching some YouTube drama slop yesterday, and part of it was H3H3 that a German guy, and the German guy was going, you know, we've studied our history and we know how evil we are. | ||
| And so we, you know, Americans are not good at studying the history. | ||
| And I just kept thinking, like, you didn't, you haven't studied your history. | ||
| You've been subject to a propaganda program that's going on 70 years that's convinced you to demonize your own people. | ||
| And it's sad to see Germans pick up that mantle and like demonize themselves and think that they're doing a good thing. | ||
| It's really a brutal way to treat somebody. | ||
| Guilt. | ||
| I mean, like this book talks about that they've studied the psychology of guilt manipulation, and that's what a big part of that is. | ||
| So if you can manipulate an entire continent of people through phony faux guilt narratives, and that's really what all the social engineering is all about is getting those narratives. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And, you know, it is, it is connected to, you know, the wider, the wider geopolitical goals of the people manipulating even figures like Hitler into serving their ends. | ||
| And I thought that was another fascinating thing that you touched on with Alex is sort of how the Rothschilds were involved in the settlement of Israel 100 years before the 1948 declaration. | ||
| So talk a little bit about that because that's something I think people don't understand enough is that the Rothschilds are really central to the whole conspiracy, the whole global conspiracy. | ||
| All really, if you, I mean, it goes back farther, obviously, but like starting with that Firth Rothschild, the first Rothschild with the five sons and the different, I mean, you talk about intelligence agencies. | ||
| You talk about the control of these central banks. | ||
| It all goes back to this one family in Germany in like the 1600s. | ||
| Well, they were smart enough to really send out the family emissaries to the European countries to basically set up banks. | ||
| And there's a great chapter in Quigley's Tragedy and Hope that's about the French banking system, the Paribas system, which was dominated and run by the Rothschilds. | ||
| So eventually, and it wasn't all Rothschilds, there was also Protestant and Catholic banking as well. | ||
| But eventually they came to dominate and they set up this pari boss banking system. | ||
| But to fast forward up to the time of the late 1800s, actually mid-1800s, in the 1860s, all the way into the 1890s, the nation-state of Israel was being planned. | ||
| They didn't know if they would eventually get a full-on nation state. | ||
| But Edmund Rothschild said, well, I'm going to start buying tracts of land. | ||
| And he became an anonymous benefactor. | ||
| He went under a code name, Nadev Hayuda. | ||
| And so they didn't know who this person was. | ||
| It was buying all this land. | ||
| They were talking to a Turkish sultan who was happy to sell it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| There's sort of absentee landowners that would live in Istanbul and owned tracts of land in Palestine where they'd get tax revenue, but it was a pittance. | ||
| And so, you know, when Rothschild comes along and goes, hey, I'll give you an exorbitant amount of money. | ||
| Of course, they're going to say yes. | ||
| And according to the biographer here, who's not partisan, it's an official kind of biography. | ||
| I mean, he doesn't put it like they really, that the Rothschilds themselves thought it would be super political. | ||
| Supposedly, he just wanted a bunch of religious sites that Jews could go and be pilgrims to. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| But then he meets with Theodore Herzl. | ||
| He meets with other characters involved in political Zionism, and they try to talk him into it. | ||
| Initially, supposedly, they weren't that interested in getting political because they were actually pretty European, and they thought this is going to damage our name in Europe if we are seen as a sort of hyper-political, you know, involved in the British Imperial Project of setting up this nation. | ||
| So they didn't immediately get that, but eventually they came around to it and they did put money into the settlement of Palestine, massive amounts of money into the 1930s. | ||
| This is after Balfour Declaration. | ||
| At that time, the first donation, I think, 1931, they gave $40,000 to Heim Weizmann and the project. | ||
| They tried to buy the Wailing Wall and they wanted to try to find the Ark of the Covenant and all this kind of stuff. | ||
| But for whatever reason, the Grand Rabbi of Israel at that time actually told Edmund that he couldn't buy the Wailing Wall. | ||
| So I don't know what the reason for that, the biography doesn't say. | ||
| But after this time, though, they do begin gradually to buy more and more and more. | ||
| And then eventually, I think my theory is that they realized that they were not going to get the recognition of the nation state of Israel until there was some event that would occur that forced remigration. | ||
| And that came in waves of tens of thousands. | ||
| Eventually, they got 500,000, 600,000 Jews into Israel after the 1930s and 40s. | ||
| But the tiny mustache man event helped to do that. | ||
| And after World War II, it's because of World War II that 1948 recognized the UN recognized Israel as because of World War II. | ||
| So when you look at Quigley from that vantage point and you see him talking about the money that was put into funding him, aiding him, bringing him to power, giving him, as we said, like there's a whole chapter in Quigley and Treasury and Hope on the dual strategy. | ||
| And the dual strategy is that the British power structure was telling Hitler the whole time, we will secretly support you. | ||
| We're not going to attack you. | ||
| Go into Poland, go into Czechoslovakia, take the money, take whatever, take the loot. | ||
| We're behind you, but we're going to have to tell the public that we're against you. | ||
| And after all this, they stabbed him in the back. | ||
| They didn't keep supporting him. | ||
| Then we got World War II. | ||
| And why would we want World War II? | ||
| Well, World War I was engineered, according to Quigley, by the same elite families and power structure to get the League of Nations. | ||
| The League of Nations didn't have any teeth. | ||
| America opposed it. | ||
| So, well, let's have a bigger war with a more villainous figure. | ||
| Then we'll have what we want, which wasn't just the nation state of Israel. | ||
| That's one piece of an overall larger picture, which is, I think, what changing images of man is about. | ||
| And like, here's the thing. | ||
| Everybody says, well, is it the Jews or is it these people who are like theosophists, socialists? | ||
| These projects work together because the socialist Zionist project, Zionism is all socialism. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Especially with Hess and Herzl and these characters. | ||
| It's the same socialism as these people. | ||
| So when you read these, when you read like Moses Hess, he's not a theist in the way that you think of like a personal God external to you. | ||
| He explicitly says, I believe in Hegel, process theology, pantheism, Spinoza. | ||
| Spinoza was a Jewish pantheist. | ||
| He says that's what our project is. | ||
| God is the dialectic of everything happening in history. | ||
| That's God. | ||
| Dialectical process. | ||
| So he thinks that the dialectical process is moving man towards, in Hess's view, the establishment of a nation state that would be the beacon for world socialism. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Now, not everybody has that same idea, right? | ||
| The Theosophists, they didn't really like the Judaic idea of it. | ||
| They said, no, maybe it'll be tiny mustache man. | ||
| Maybe that kind of an idea will set up a socialist world government, fascist world government, whatever. | ||
| But it ended up being none of those. | ||
| And it went, and it's basically the Fabian socialist model, which blends perfectly with the Zionist model. | ||
| It's the same stuff. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And of course, a lot of the early settlers of the kibbutzes were socialists who had been driven out of the pale of settlement by the pogroms. | ||
| And then they went and settled. | ||
| And once the Tsar was overthrown, they took what they'd learned and went up and helped to establish the Bolshevik government in the communist government through taking sort of the theories of Marx that they had been espousing previously. | ||
| They put them into action in the kibbutzes and sort of learned how politically they could work out. | ||
| Explain what you mean by Israel being just part of a much larger plan because I think that's where people get stuck. | ||
| They see Israel doing a lot of stuff, the Greater Israel Project, all that stuff. | ||
| I always try to remind them, that's just one part. | ||
| And tell me if I'm wrong. | ||
| My assumption is that they want Israel and specifically Jerusalem to be the capital of the global government. | ||
| It will be sort of inviolable. | ||
| I always say globalism is sort of the marriage of communism and Zionism, where you have the nation state that's inviolable in Israel, but everywhere else is de-eracinated and the borders are empty. | ||
| Is that what you mean when you say it's part of a larger project? | ||
| Yeah, I think that there's certain people like Moses Hess or Herzl that would think that we'll set up a nation state. | ||
| We will have the real beacon of world socialism that will save the world. | ||
| And they actually speak of it in salvific ways. | ||
| So like when they read Isaiah 53, the suffering servant, they say, oh, that's not really about some Messiah or some person. | ||
| It's about the Jewish people and the eventual establishment of this nation state that will be the salvation. | ||
| So they internalize the messianic prophecies. | ||
| Not all of them. | ||
| I'm just saying some. | ||
| So I think for somebody like Moses Hess or somebody like that, or some of the Zionist ideologues, they believe in a political salvific ideology, which is very close to what we would say is kind of an antichrist ideology because that's who would accept the antichrist is somebody who believes that kind of an ideology. | ||
| But I think other globalists that don't have any problem with those flavors, like they think of it more internationally and more of a, of a, who cares if it's Israel? | ||
| I mean, Changing Image of the Man says multiple times, like all the Western biblical ideas of God have to go. | ||
| And people think, well, but what about what you're saying? | ||
| Well, I don't think that the Zionist ideology, the religious ones, they're not, it's not classical theism like we think of it. | ||
| It's process theology, which melds perfectly with the theosophists. | ||
| And the reason it's part of a bigger project is the whole world is intended by most of these people to go into some kind of a controlled technocratic agenda. | ||
| So like Alex said, I mean, there is a 100-year plan that the Chinese have. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure China doesn't really care about Israel. | ||
| I think one of their people was just blambasting the Israeli people the other day saying, we don't care about your Israel stuff. | ||
| So most of the world doesn't really care about Israel's greater project, Oded Yunnan Project, and all the Likud plan and all that. | ||
| But of course, obviously they have a huge amount of influence in the U.S. government with what did Netanyahu say? | ||
| It's very easy to move. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| So we all, I think we know this kind of stuff. | ||
| But apart from particular regions, the Middle East or whatever, there is this overall global plan that people have in the power structure that, again, you don't have to be wedded to even care about it. | ||
| There are plenty of anti-Zionist globalists like Brzezinski, somebody like that. | ||
| He was like, Jews don't really like Brzezinski. | ||
| Right. | ||
| But George Soros. | ||
| They're not a big fan of that. | ||
| So it's bigger than this, but I'm not saying that it doesn't matter. | ||
| Like, it does matter. | ||
| I mean, the Rothschilds were a huge part of this, and they were kind of running the British Empire at one point. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| After Waterloo. | ||
| And, you know, I feel like a lot of people think when they think of conspiracies, they think that, you know, the people in power are just omnipresent, omnipotent. | ||
| They can do whatever the hell they want, whatever the hell they want. | ||
| They have this list of things they're going to do, and they're just checking them off the list. | ||
| That's not really how it is, though, right? | ||
| They have plans. | ||
| They try one thing. | ||
| It doesn't quite work. | ||
| They try another thing. | ||
| Okay, let's, you know, World War I didn't quite have the oomph we needed for the world government. | ||
| Maybe we're missing a figure. | ||
| Maybe we need that single figure to make the Satan of our new religion. | ||
| We need a guy. | ||
| How about Hitler? | ||
| So, I mean, do you agree with that? | ||
| That, you know, it's not, it's not so much these people are just sort of have a plan for the world and we're all just helplessly watching. | ||
| They're having to react to how humanity reacts. | ||
| Some of their plans work. | ||
| Some of them don't. | ||
| Some take longer than they think. | ||
| It's not a foregone conclusion, is it? | ||
| Yeah, I don't think they knew for sure that the way that they wanted to goad, you know, Hitler into World War II, that that was necessarily going to work. | ||
| I think that they strategized and planned it. | ||
| There's some really great, they're somewhat disputed, but I think they're pretty revelatory. | ||
| There's a great document called Red Symphony, and it's an interrogation of a guy named Christian Rakovsky. | ||
| He was the Trotskyite socialist president of Bulgaria. | ||
| And he was taken in by the NKVD and KVD because Stalin wasn't a huge fan of Trotsky. | ||
| So he arrested him at one point. | ||
| And the interrogations are all real. | ||
| This one, some people debate it because it's so revelatory. | ||
| But you basically have this lower-level NKVD guy. | ||
| I think his name is Gabriel. | ||
| And he's interrogating Rakovsky. | ||
| And he says, you know, what were you thinking by opposing Stalin? | ||
| What did you think you would get out of this? | ||
| And the guy says, oh, well, you don't understand that we're going to get another war. | ||
| We're going to have another, you know, there'll be another world war and we're going to have eventually world socialism. | ||
| And he mentions like some really prominent British spies like Sidney Riley. | ||
| And he says, we're all working for the Rothschilds. | ||
| You don't know that. | ||
| And the guy who's the sort of mid-level NKVD interrogator, he's like, how could we be working at the behest of banking capital? | ||
| We are socialist Marxists. | ||
| And it blows his mind. | ||
| And if you think that's outlandish, well, why would David Rockefeller be such a huge proponent of Harold Lasky, the most famous socialist in America? | ||
| He studied under him. | ||
| He wrote under him, promoted him. | ||
| And, you know, Dave Rockefeller wrote two famous New York Times editorials in the late 70s about how big a fan he was of Mao. | ||
| Chase Bank was the first bank in China. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So there is no antipathy at that level between Marxism socialism and big capital. | ||
| To go back to Spangler. | ||
| Spangler said it famously that there is no socialist revolution not funded by big capital. | ||
| Right. | ||
| It's absolutely true. | ||
| And I mean, not just big capital. | ||
| I mean, the American government basically built the USSR during World War II. | ||
| I mean, we weren't just sending them weapons. | ||
| We were sending them factories and trains and absolutely everything. | ||
| Why would we do that if they're our big enemy? | ||
| More with Jay Dyer on the other side. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, folks. | ||
| More to come. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is The War Room, Jay Dyer in studio with me. | ||
| And, you know, I hope the audience is like me and appreciates that while, yes, InfoWars tends to focus a lot on breaking news and political analysis of what's going on just in the immediate reality of planet Earth. | ||
| We also have the leeway and the audience to appreciate that we can just sort of talk about history and how we got to this point and the whole timeline, not just sort of reacting immediately to everything. | ||
| So, you know, I think InfoWars is a very unique outlet in that regard. | ||
| And I hope that you support us at thealxjonesstore.com, the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| I know it's been just ever since I started hosting a show on InfoWars, I always reveled in the ability to, you know, I'm going to take a segment just to ramble about Roman history. | ||
| And I know our audience will appreciate it and not go, God, get back to the news. | ||
| They understand how all this ties in together. | ||
| And actually, the background is necessary to understand the present. | ||
| If you don't know how we got here, how are we going to get out of the trap they're trying to put us in? | ||
| So please do support this extremely unique and powerful outlet at thealxjonesor.com. | ||
| You can go to the alexjonstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you. | ||
| Of course, Jay Dyer is the perfect person to have on in this regard. | ||
| Jsanalysis.com, YouTube, J Dyer, and on X at J underscore Double O7. | ||
| We just continued our conversation like we didn't even go to break. | ||
| So I'm like, okay, wait, where did we drop off? | ||
| Where did we leave off that? | ||
| We left off at Cobra Commander. | ||
| Yeah, well, yeah, that's how we started, actually. | ||
| When I came in here, Harrison was in here watching old G.I. Joe clips, and I was cracking up because there's a really good one that you should find on YouTube or on TikTok or whatever, where Cobra Commander actually creates Cobra Coin as a competitor to the Federal Reserve. | ||
| And the funny part of it is, is everything that Cobra Commander is saying about the Federal Reserve being a scam is actually true. | ||
| That's awesome. | ||
| We're going to create Cobra Coin. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Federal Reserve is a scam. | |
| The Cobra's the good guy. | ||
| And then G.I. Joe's like, we got to prop up the dollar in the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Nothing more American than fiat currency. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| See, I never watched G.I. Joe as a kid. | ||
| So I know, really, I've watched more of Alex Jones pretending to be Cobra Commander than I've ever actually watched Cobra Commander. | ||
| So I saw that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I saw that TikTok video and I was like, okay, base. | |
| All right. | ||
| I got a new show for my kids that will go on the approved list, I suppose. | ||
| There's episodes on MKUltra. | ||
| There's episodes on genetic engineering. | ||
| There's weather modification. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's what. | |
| All of that. | ||
| And the reason for that, if you really want to know, I can tell you about it. | ||
| I did a lecture on this one time in the UK. | ||
| I forget the guy's name, but the guy who's involved in consulting on G.I. Joe is a Pentagon guy. | ||
| So this is actually like, for people my age, this was like to make me want to be in specialty. | ||
| It's like literal programming propaganda. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Well, it probably works. | ||
| You don't say anything like, you know, top gun, you know, they always say that Navy recruits spiked 1,000% or whatever. | ||
| My dad went into the Navy from Top Gun. | ||
| From Top Gun. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, yeah. | |
| Well, it works. | ||
| And of course, that's sort of your speciality is looking into the hidden messages and everything. | ||
| I know last time you were on, we were talking about how just the facade has fallen away and they're just outright satanic now at this point. | ||
| And, you know, it seems like obviously the market is open for people that aren't pushing that to come in and scoop up some of that market share. | ||
| And I know a lot of good people are doing that. | ||
| For people like myself who have young kids, how would you suggest we navigate the modern media landscape? | ||
| Just watch stuff from our childhood because that's basically what we do. | ||
| Well, it's funny, though, because when I watch childhood stuff, then you see the propaganda at that. | ||
| Right. | ||
| But it's just not as bad. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not as bad. | |
| No. | ||
| It's still pretty wholesome. | ||
| I mean, we got so sick of movies that Jamie and I were watching a lot of noir films from the 1940s because I'd not seen a lot of those. | ||
| And then what's amazing about those is once you know all like the World War II narrative, so many of those World War II films were also propaganda, especially like Humphrey Bogart films. | ||
| Many of those are propaganda. | ||
| In my third book that's about to come out, Esther Collewood III, I had a whole chapter on, there's actually a network of British intelligence spy fiction writers that came to write a lot of those movies in the 1940s. | ||
| So even, you know, Joan Crawford movies, Humphrey Bogart films, those are essentially films making America feel the necessity to be involved in on the side of Britain. | ||
| And that was the job of some of those people coming over here for British intelligence. | ||
| You know, it's wild how involved British intelligence has been in American media since World War I. Although I think it was World War II, didn't they have they had an office in the Rockefeller building in New York? | ||
| Yeah, William Stevenson's office was there. | ||
| His name, the codename was Intrepid, and they set him up a specific propaganda office in the Rockefeller Plaza. | ||
| Isn't that crazy? | ||
| So a British intelligence had an office in America to propagandize Americans into joining the war on behalf of Britain, and we just went along with it. | ||
| Yeah, and they were the ones that helped Bill Donovan set up the OSS. | ||
| So it's Noel Coward, it's William Stevenson from Canadian Intelligence, Ian Fleming. | ||
| And Stevenson set up quite a bit of things like that. | ||
| But they were really telling Bill Donovan, okay, here's how you structure your intelligence apparatus. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And that's sort of the thing, isn't it? | ||
| Any of these institutions, you have to go back to the guy who's done it before, which is why, you know, you're talking about Protestant and Catholic bankers, you know, even as far back as like the Middle Ages, but it's like for them to get money, who'd they have to go to? | ||
| How'd they learn the craft? | ||
| There were people already doing it before them. | ||
| So that's why when you trace this stuff up the pyramid, you know, you honestly always end up with the Rothschilds because when you talk about intelligence and the way that, you know, by setting up five banks in five cities all over Europe, they just sort of, in a de facto way, established a method by which information could be transmitted quickly and safely between all these countries. | ||
| So they therefore established a better intelligence network than the countries that they were living in, which is why when Rothschild went and started selling bonds after the Battle of Waterloo, everybody knew, hey, that guy's got the information. | ||
| That guy knows more than we do. | ||
| He's selling. | ||
| We must have lost. | ||
| That's how he buys up the British economy. | ||
| But that sort of, to me, if you're tracing back the birth of intelligence, CIA to OSS to British intelligence to the Rothschild banking family. | ||
| Yeah, if you watch Wall Street, I don't know how cognizant Oliver Stone was when he put this in there, but the Gordon Gecko character, it's an excellent analogy of exactly what you're talking about, how when Charlie Sheen, who's the sort of blue-collar guy, and he goes to study under Gordon Gecko to become like the psycho Wall Street guy with the big fet, you know, Zach Morris cell phone. | ||
| The coolest guy in the world. | ||
| What happens is Charlie Sheen thinks, oh, this is all about sitting at the desk and, you know, spending all hours making the trades. | ||
| And Gordon Gecko's laughing at him. | ||
| And he's like, no, I want you to go get dirt on the guy. | ||
| I want you to go sleep with this person. | ||
| I want you to become an intelligence agent. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And you get the inside information. | ||
| And then Charlie Sheen's like, that's insider trading. | ||
| And Gordon Gecko just laughs at him. | ||
| He's like, yeah, that's how it works, dude. | ||
| So just like we were talking about with Waterloo, the older banking structure is essentially an intelligence apparatus. | ||
| I think Interpol comes out of that. | ||
| Rothschild Network as well. | ||
| And so what they had figured out was secret societies are much like intelligence agencies and they overlap with banking entities. | ||
| And that's essentially what we have today is we're ruled by banker spies. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Technocrats. | ||
| Spies working on behalf of bankers sort of, because obviously you can have a lot of control economically as a bank, but you can't kill people. | ||
| You need an intelligence agency to do that. | ||
| So the intelligence agencies have formed a sort of the enforcement arm of the banking Caval that took power of the British Empire after the Battle of Waterloo. | ||
| Well, a few years ago, maybe 10 years ago, a bunch of big stories came out. | ||
| Alex reported at the time. | ||
| It was in The Guardian. | ||
| It was in all the big papers. | ||
| HSBC, big, huge mega banks, hundreds of billions of dollars of laundering drug money. | ||
| How do you do that if you're not connected to intelligence agencies? | ||
| Obviously, they are. | ||
| And when you look at the document that we've covered quite a bit, I call it the Eagle 2 document, but it's a leaked document that was made by the FBI talking about the CIA drug running operation, how it got started. | ||
| And basically it says, you know, at a certain point, this operation became so big, the CIA couldn't handle it. | ||
| So it was, you know, control was given to Baron de Rothschild. | ||
| And he was operating out of Paris with the, I can't remember exactly what it is, not the Bank of International Settlements, but another organization like that that basically took control of the drug running operation that had been the black budget money generator for CIA. | ||
| Well, that's Gladio. | ||
| And another intelligence bank connected to Gladio is Charles Hambrough. | ||
| And he was a Jewish British intelligence operative who started the Hembrose Brothers Bank, which was directly tied into all the Gladio Vatican Bank scandal. | ||
| So this is not antithetical. | ||
| It's not like, well, is it the Jewish banking or is it the Vatican? | ||
| All tied together because it's a giant global network of organized crime. | ||
| And if you study organized crime, and if you go listen to the interviews that I've done with Sammy the Bull, he's very candid now, many years after that life of talking about all these networks overlapping and how you got to grease the skids and you got to be in with the politicians. | ||
| And he talks about, oh, yeah, of course, we work with the Jewish mafia where all the mafis work together. | ||
| And so it's a big club. | ||
| I'm not a huge fan of George Carlin, but I mean, I mean, that's what Gordon Gecko represents there, Rick. | ||
| And Gecko is a serpent. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| Yeah, that's super interesting. | ||
| And of course, now, you know, they're rigging NBA games, apparently. | ||
| The Italian mafia rigging NBA games. | ||
| I don't know if you saw that, the gambling ring. | ||
| I did it, but that's nothing new. | ||
| Right. | ||
| I mean, it's been going on since the World Series and what is it, 1911, something like that. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| So, yeah. | ||
| And of course, we've heard people like Ted Gunderson say, hey, look, you know, there may be a high-value person that wants a child and you got to know where to get a child for them. | ||
| You know, yeah, we got to break the law, but that's what we do. | ||
| We're saving people's lives. | ||
| So they really are able to justify anything and justify their partnerships with criminal enterprises because, hey, they can do things other people can't and we might need it for national security. | ||
| It's really a very brilliant excuse to keep it secret and be able to do whatever the hell you want. | ||
| Intelligence agencies really are the engine that keeps this new world order operation moving forward. | ||
| Yeah, and they were set up by the, at least the OSS, CIA were set up, as we said, by British intelligence. | ||
| But British intelligence, the modern security services were set up at the turn of the century by Fabian socialists, who all had the same Milner socialist ideology. | ||
| So to go back to that point that I meant to mention about Israel, a lot of the British elite were not pro-Israel. | ||
| But that doesn't immediately make them like good people, right? | ||
| So for example, many of the British spies that are very well known, very famous, you have T.E. Lawrence, you have Gertrude Bell, St. John Philby. | ||
| St. John Philby became a Wahhabi convert, right? | ||
| And that was whether he really believed it or I don't know. | ||
| But he was working as a British intelligence operative with the Salafi strain of Islam so that the empire could have control and influence through that branch. | ||
| And they ended up using them quite often because that's where we get this whole Al-Qaeda Mujahideen alliance that we use. | ||
| And then Israel is now using that with Jolani and Al-Nusra and taking down Assad in Syria, Timber Sycamore, all those operations that, by the way, I was writing about Timber Sycamore in 2014 and got called all kinds of names. | ||
| And, oh, you're such a crazy Temple hat. | ||
| And then it comes out in the New York Times, Timber Sycamore is the name of the project, billions of dollars. | ||
| We didn't know the name of it. | ||
| What is that? | ||
| Sorry, I'm blinking away. | ||
| Yeah, just look up New York Times, Timber Sycamore. | ||
| That was the name for the billions of dollars that were sent to Topple Assad back. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| Remember 2014, 15, 16, like that time? | ||
| And it was like, you can't massage the Assad and everybody was stuck. | ||
| So that was what we were writing about, talking about the White Helmets was one of these big propaganda operations that they were doing. | ||
| They got an Oscar for the documentary. | ||
| And of course, George Clooney was a big promoter of all that. | ||
| Yeah, it's not just Saudi money, though. | ||
| Look up Timber Sycamore, and you'll get the New York Times headline. | ||
| And it says it came to an end. | ||
| Well, it came to an end because they ended up eventually toppling Assad. | ||
| And they put Jolani and Jolani was the head of Al-Nusra back when they were trying to topple Assad when the CFR was writing articles saying, we need Al-Qaeda in Syria. | ||
| Yep, that's it. | ||
| It's on the front page of the New York Times. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But they are Al-Qaeda. | |
| Yep. | ||
| And of course, ISIS was mostly Saudi Arabian. | ||
| A lot of people actually out of Europe that were radicalized in the Saudi Arabian funded mosques there. | ||
| But when you look at the history of the Saud family, I mean, it doesn't go back that far. | ||
| And that was a project of British intelligence as well, right? | ||
| A British and American intelligence setting up the Saud family, which was just, I mean, it was basically just a bunch of barbarians. | ||
| This one strong man, you know, got them all together. | ||
| And it's been him or his sons or his grandsons running the entire country ever since. | ||
| You know, all of the princes, they're all direct descendants of this one King Saud, who, you know, British intelligence picked as the as the vessel through which they would control the oil. | ||
| Yeah, the British carved up that whole area with the French, Sykes Pico, and that's where we get Iraq from. | ||
| We get Pakistan. | ||
| We get Saudi Arabia. | ||
| Those are all creations of the British Empire. | ||
| And it was T.E. Lawrence that went and set up the Sauds. | ||
| Gertrude Bell went and set up what was in Iraq. | ||
| She's a pretty fascinating character. | ||
| But what's interesting about those people is that they were not pro-Zionist. | ||
| They were Arabophiles. | ||
| So amongst the British structure of the spies and the elites, you had these people that really loved Islam and Wahhabism, which as a woman is really odd that Gertrude Bell would love Islam. | ||
| But she was really into, she studied Persian Farsi and poetry and Rumi and all this stuff. | ||
| So she was an oddball, but she was working directly underneath the British Foreign Office for the Middle East, which was headed up by a Chatham House Royal Society Royal Institute of International Affairs guy answering directly to people like Milner and the Rothschilds. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| And, you know, it was interesting. | ||
| I was shown a clip from this sitcom out of the UK called Yes Minister. | ||
| I don't know if you ever heard of that one, but it was a clip from the 70s, and it all has to do with political stuff. | ||
| And they say, well, are you going to go give a speech about Zionism? | ||
| He says, yes, of course. | ||
| And of course, I'm going to say I'm going to stand against it and blah, blah, blah. | ||
| And it was weird because it was at the time in the 70s, I guess, it was just understood the average Britain and the entire British government was anti-Zionist, which was just kind of odd because you don't, you think that's a problem. | ||
| There's always labor governments usually. | ||
| And I think that's what it was. | ||
| Yeah, it was sort of a reforming type of government that was in there. | ||
| But it was interesting to me to see that in the 70s, it was just sort of assumed that if the British government addressed Israel in the UN, they would be against it and they would be against Zionism. | ||
| And people don't know that that it was as early as, you know, or as, you know, 40 years ago, that was the case in all of the UK. | ||
| So things have changed quite a bit. | ||
| And now you've got people, I don't know if you've seen the video, this guy's walking around a, he's walking around to protest where people are being arrested for like waving Palestinian flags. | ||
| And he's going up to cops and going, I'm in favor of genocide. | ||
| I want Israel to kill all of the women and children. | ||
| Is that okay? | ||
| And they're going, hey, you're allowed to have your opinion. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| While people are getting arrested for waving a flag. | ||
| So it's gone the other direction now. | ||
| And people are literally being arrested for opposing Netanyahu or Israel in the UK. | ||
| Again, is that like, how does that happen? | ||
| How does the UK help establish Israel, then become anti-Zionist, and now become so pro-Zionist that they'll arrest you if you're not. | ||
| I mean, it's strange how all this just sort of happens and people don't notice the change. | ||
| Well, if you go back to like the time of the Balfour Declaration, like I said, like those British spies and the Royal Society elite, they were actually split between the pro-Arab Arabophiles and the Rothschild Zionist side of it. | ||
| They had kind of a division between them. | ||
| You can even see this up into World War II when you have, you know, the king is basically a Nazi. | ||
| He marries the Wallace Simpson, marries the American woman. | ||
| So there was still the split amongst that power structure in the UK. | ||
| But when they, you know, when the King David Hotel gets bombed, it gets bombed by people from the Irgun, the Stern gang. | ||
| That becomes basically the intelligence apparatus and the military for Israel. | ||
| That was, I think, enough to tell the British that they wanted him out. | ||
| But even to those periods that you're talking about, the Labor government was never really pro-Zionist. | ||
| They were socialists. | ||
| And if you're some of the socialists were, you know, like Blavatsky and these kinds of characters, they don't care about Yahweh or the Bible. | ||
| So they don't have a problem saying like, we don't care about Israel. | ||
| We just want world socialism. | ||
| But then you have other people who are rabid Zionists. | ||
| Maybe not so much in the UK. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, ultimately they end up fighting the same wars that we do because there's a special relationship. | ||
| And it's the same power structure that runs the UK and runs us. | ||
| The only difference is that with Kier Starmer, who is an open Fabian Socialist member of the Fabian Social Society, like he's just an example of this hardcore technocratic worldview, rolling out the digital IDs, arresting people for tweets. | ||
| All of that is explicitly what the hardcore socialists want. | ||
| But not everybody is as hardcore, but that doesn't mean that they're good guys because they're, you know, you can be anti-Zionist and be a bad guy. | ||
| Right, right. | ||
| It's funny that you have to say that, but I was actually arguing about that with a guy on X the other day because, you know, I had people reach out to me, you know, a month ago and say, how can you like Charlie Kirk? | ||
| He's a Zionist. | ||
| And it's like, you think that is my litmus test? | ||
| If you're a Zionist, you're good. | ||
| And if you're not, you're not. | ||
| It's like, no, no, no. | ||
| I got a lot of other concerns. | ||
| That's a very minor concern as far as I go. | ||
| I'm about to cover a book called, it's a famous historical text. | ||
| It's the collaboration between the Zionists and the Nazis. | ||
| Right. | ||
| There's a book on the Havara agreement. | ||
| So they had to make these. | ||
| I'm not saying they had the same worldview. | ||
| I'm just saying they had to make these plans and these deals. | ||
| They did kind of have this same worldview in a lot of ways. | ||
| Right, certain ways. | ||
| You're talking about Kalergi. | ||
| I think he was the one that coined the term master race. | ||
| Maybe it wasn't him. | ||
| know somebody else but you know a lot of the ideas from kalergi we're sort of just sort of you know it was hitler going hey they're not the no we are yeah Yeah, yeah, they're not the master race. | ||
| We're the master race. | ||
| He didn't come up with it. | ||
| He just took it for himself. | ||
| Yeah, Kalergi says that in practical idealism, Jews will be the master race of Europe. | ||
| He said everybody else will be Mongrelized. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| His words, not mine. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| But yeah, Hitler had a different idea that the Teutonic, you know, Germanic people would be the master race. | ||
| And again, from the Orthodox Christian perspective, like we don't see Hitler as a good guy just because he was opposed to usury and this kind of stuff. | ||
| I mean, so were all the Orthodox kings and saints. | ||
| Like they were opposed to usury. | ||
| Like you didn't have first thousand years of Christendom opposed usury. | ||
| Right. | ||
| So setting the bar kind of low to just be like, oh, with whoever's against usury. | ||
| Okay, well, I guess you're against the papacy then because the papacy is pro-usury. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, the motivation we would say as Orthodox Christians that the mantle of Christian civilization after the fall of Byzantium, we believe that kind of fell to Russia. | ||
| Not that it was perfect, but it was kind of the preserver of the state apparatus of Christianity. | ||
| It was the Third Rome, right? | ||
| And the sort of last thing. | ||
| Yeah, exactly. | ||
| The continuation. | ||
| And then when that fell to the Bolsheviks, many of which were Jewish, obviously Talmudic, they murdered the royal family on purpose in a ritual sacrifice. | ||
| So like that leaves a vacuum. | ||
| And it's odd the only monarchy that's really powerful is the British monarchy. | ||
| I was going to ask you. | ||
| I was going to ask you about that because it seemed to me like that's what happened is that the Rothschild sort of took over the British economy and therefore the British Empire. | ||
| And then sort of systematically, you know, 100 years later, they're the only powerful monarchy left and everything else is just sort of a symbolic, if they even exist. | ||
| Obviously, Russia went down. | ||
| France went down. | ||
| That may have been related, but obviously became before. | ||
| But yeah, it's like very clearly within 100 years, you have every other monarchy falling. | ||
| Well, the same motivation that promotes that moves Napoleon to attack Russia, same motivation that moves Hitler to attack Russia. | ||
| And I'm not saying that that makes Stalin or that makes communism good. | ||
| The idea is to wipe out Christian civilization. | ||
| And even if you read Quigley, who is not, I'm not promoting him as a good guy. | ||
| He's an admission text. | ||
| Quigley says that the purpose of the two world wars was to destroy the remnants of Christian civilization, which he calls authority-based civilizations. | ||
| He says the modern world will be based on democracy and markets and consensus. | ||
| And the idea of the Austro-Hungarian Empire was a Catholic civilization, and Russian Orthodox Christianity and the Tsar is a Christian civilization. | ||
| He says those have to go to have the new system. | ||
| Right. | ||
| It's all so fat. | ||
| Like, again, we could just get into all this stuff endlessly, the creation of the CIA and the Dolus brothers and their involvement in the Treaty of Versailles. | ||
| I mean, this stuff is endlessly fascinating. | ||
| I know we only have two minutes left, but let's touch on some modern and ongoing stuff here. | ||
| What is your take on the board of peace to oversee Gaza and the inclusion of Tony Blair and these people in sort of an international body to oversee this land? | ||
| I don't know what to think of it. | ||
| That's nonsense. | ||
| Fabian's, he's a Fabian socialist. | ||
| He comes out of the same structure of the third way, Bill Clinton, Tony Blair. | ||
| They were at the same time under Quigley and people that have this kind of third way ideology. | ||
| A third way ideology was this idea that you could combine Western capitalism with Eastern communism, and we would get this product. | ||
| Dialectics, right? | ||
| Dialectical synthesis. | ||
| And that's really no different than the Fabian Socialist model, which is the people above them anyway. | ||
| I mean, this is this is, I mean, he's Clinton's mentor, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| So when I see Tony Blair and people like that, there, who's Labor Party, it's the Fabian Socialists that renamed themselves the Labor Party. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, really? | |
| I didn't know that. | ||
| No, that's them. | ||
| And the fact that they're like, don't care about Israel doesn't mean that they're good guys. | ||
| They're just more openly sort of technocratic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So you can have an internationalism that is like Israel focused, or you can have an internationalism that's like socialist-focused and doesn't care about Israel. | ||
| And then you can have a Chinese one. | ||
| And there is sort of a weird sort of synthesis, right? | ||
| Because Tony Blair is obviously very good friends with Larry Ellison, who's helping to put on all this technocratic control and is very pro-Israel. | ||
| So, you know, it's different factions, but they find common cause and work together quite a bit. | ||
| Your new book is coming out. | ||
| When can people expect your book? | ||
| What's coming up for you next? | ||
| Well, and to be clear about that in terms of like, I'm not saying Blair is anti-Zionist. | ||
| No, Blair was involved with Bush in fighting all those same wars for the Likud and all that. | ||
| So I'm not saying that. | ||
| I'm just saying that there's always elements within the Labor Party like Jeremy Corbyn, who was very, very anti-Zionist, but attacked in the British and Western media. | ||
| I don't agree with Jeremy Corbyn, but I'm saying that he wasn't attacked until he was like making these sort of public anti-Zionist positions. | ||
| Right, true. | ||
| The book is a Circle Eight With Three, and it covers a lot of the big things that I never got to in the previous texts. | ||
| So we cover some pretty big hitting blockbuster type films, a lot of Christopher Nolan stuff that I never got to, a lot of Marvel stuff. | ||
| We go pretty deep into Kabbalah, esotericism, Lovecraft films, B-movies, and Antichrist films. | ||
| So, Esther Collywood 3 is going to be a unique installment in the trilogy. | ||
| It's the finality of the trilogy there. | ||
| It's the way to find out the hidden secret meanings behind the movies that you may love. | ||
| So, if you want a deeper appreciation for what the filmmakers were really trying to do, you got to check out the first two esoteric Hollywood books, and the third one's coming out soon. | ||
| You can find all of those and more at jsanalysis.com. | ||
| YouTube is J Dyer, J underscore Double O S on X. Thank you so much for joining us, sir. | ||
| Hell Cobra. | ||
| Hell Cobra. | ||
| We'll be right back, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Third hour of War Room is on, and we're actually going to get to the news here. | ||
| But I hope people do appreciate it as much as I enjoy it. | ||
| The fact that we get to have these incredible guests on and not always be bound by whatever the breaking news is, whatever the latest headlines are. | ||
| Of course, we like to cover those as well because you're so often being given a warped or perverted or distorted or just sometimes an outright false view of the goings on around the world. | ||
| So, obviously, we have to keep up with all that stuff. | ||
| But what would InfoWars be without an hour or two getting into the disturbing history of all this stuff or the disgusting reality of things like surrogacy that are being normalized at an incredibly rapid rate? | ||
| And again, all of this stuff, as disseparate as it may be, it's actually all the same topic. | ||
| We're on the same topic the entire time. | ||
| Whether we're talking about the early Rothschild investment in land and with you know outside of Jerusalem, or whether we're talking about babies being sold to gay men, it's actually this is actually all the same story being told that we're all living and main characters in. | ||
| So I'm just so happy to have an outlet like this that can serve these interests. | ||
| I hope you support us by going to thealxjonesstore.com. | ||
| Genuinely, we will, you know, we've got some more news here. | ||
| I'm not going to comment on it because you know as much as I do if you watch the Alex Jones show today. | ||
| But yeah, it looks like, you know, it could be the real deal this time. | ||
| We could actually be going down for good, like we've been avoiding for so long. | ||
| So please do support us however you can. | ||
| And the best way to do that is to go to the alexjonesstore.com and to go to alexjonesapp.com, alexjonesapp.com is where you can get our brand new mobile app, which shot to the top of the charts on the app store and is now available on the Google Play Store for your Android devices. | ||
| Just don't ask, just don't ask what sigil the Google Play logo is modeled after. | ||
| Just don't ask that. | ||
| But it's okay. | ||
| If you're using Google, it's fine. | ||
| We don't think we, you know, we know you don't know. | ||
| It's fine. | ||
| Every time I see the Google logos, it just look exactly like the demonology symbols that they're designed to look like. | ||
| So I can't help but comment on it. | ||
| I have a lot of videos to get to here today. | ||
| I want to go to this one, Clip 16. | ||
| This is from our friends, friends of InfoWars, Caffecito Break. | ||
| Caffecito Break on X. Some really fantastic women that stood up very strongly against the lockdowns and the vaccine mandates in New York City. | ||
| They're proud New Yorkers, but they're fighting the good fight. | ||
| They're true Info Warriors, and they were out there giving taking interviews. | ||
| This one, I believe, is with Scott Lebido, who is, of course, a famous right-wing artist. | ||
| Clip 16 here, this is him talking about why Cuomo cannot beat Mamdani and Curtis Silwall. | ||
| Silwa is the only choice for New Yorkers. | ||
| This, of course, is a major topic as the mayoral race heats up. | ||
| People are demanding that Curtis Silwa drop out, even though Cuomo should really be the one to drop out. | ||
| He's the disgraced one. | ||
| Curtis Silwa is a pretty well-established track record of his activity in New York, being with the Guardian Angels on the subway all the way back in the 80s. | ||
| Here's the interview by Caffecito Break. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Cuomo cannot win. | |
| He cannot beat Mam Dandy. | ||
| It's not possible. | ||
| He is not going to get the votes. | ||
| Curtis is the only one that can take this. | ||
| And there's two and a half weeks. | ||
| I'm sorry, a week and a half for people to flip their script and realize if you really want to save your city, you have to back Curtis because Cuomo equals an extension of Mam Dandy. | ||
| He's only going to get stronger. | ||
| He's only 33. | ||
| He's an aggressive, progressive, woke socialist communist jihadi, and he's only going to grow if Cuomo wins. | ||
| So you're kicking a can down the road. | ||
| Everybody's putting a band-aid on a terminal, terminal cancer. | ||
| You're not doing anything. | ||
| You're not saving it. | ||
| This is the only time to save the city. | ||
| Curtis is not going to be here in four years to try it again. | ||
| Nobody's going to fill that shield. | ||
| Nobody's going to be here. | ||
| It's going to be Mam Dandy again, and the city council, the assembly are going to be all of his cult followers. | ||
| The city is lost forever. | ||
| So this is not about saving the city and throwing Curtis out with the backwater. | ||
| Everybody needs to flip that script. | ||
| You want to save this city? | ||
| It's Curtis Sleewa. | ||
| Move that energy over and we are a lock. | ||
| That is a fact. | ||
| Sliwa, Curtis Sleewa. | ||
| I really like Curtis Liwa. | ||
| Everything I see from him is pretty awesome. | ||
| Of course, Cuomo is a total dirtbag and should have dropped out when he lost the primary. | ||
| What the hell is he doing there? | ||
| All right. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| This is the War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, brought to you by the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Yeah, the mayoral race in New York City is getting a lot of attention these days, coming to the end. | ||
| I guess they had a big debate yesterday. | ||
| And Mamdani is clearly way out and ahead. | ||
| And the rest of the vote is sort of being split by Cuomo and Curtis Silwa. | ||
| And people are calling on Curtis Silwa to drop out. | ||
| But Andrew Cuomo is a Democrat. | ||
| Mamdani is a Democrat. | ||
| Mamdani won the Democrat primary. | ||
| Why is Cuomo still in the race? | ||
| I mean, it seems like the only reason he'd be in the race is to split the rest of the vote to give the victory to Mamdani. | ||
| And as a lot of people have pointed out, I saw a great chart. | ||
| I actually retweeted it today. | ||
| Let me bring that up because it, you know, just shows that there's really not a lot of air, not a lot of sunlight in between Cuomo and Mamdani when you actually look at the things that they support. | ||
| How do the mayoral candidates measure up about public safety? | ||
| And it shows that when it comes to defunding the police, to bail reform, to raising the age of, you know, to be convicted, discovery laws, reinstating unvaxed workers, repealing the 15th Amendment, parole for cop killers, public safety experience. | ||
| Basically on all of those, Mamdani just takes what Cuomo did already and sort of accelerates it or expands it a little farther. | ||
| But it's not, they're not different. | ||
| There's varying degrees of the same. | ||
| Whereas Curtis Silwa clearly has the much, much, much better policies. | ||
| When it comes to things like defunding the police, Mamdani wants to basically totally defund the police and get rid of jails. | ||
| He literally wants to release 7,000 convicts from Rikers Island because jails is bad, y'all, and violence is just a social construct. | ||
| I mean, the man is literally insane. | ||
| And as much as, you know, New York is already a sort of giant dumpster fire anyway, it could get a hell of a lot worse. | ||
| And I, you know, I love New York in a lot of ways. | ||
| As an American, it's obviously symbolic of the power and grandeur that we represent. | ||
| And, you know, going there, it's a very energetic and powerful city, and I would hate to see it in the control of a literal communist who seems only interested in serving the worst people in the world. | ||
| And he's a fraud. | ||
| And that's sort of an amazing thing about the Democrats is it doesn't matter to their voters that they're frauds. | ||
| It really doesn't. | ||
| And this is the case over and over and over again. | ||
| There's a guy who's running for office in Maine as a progressive who apparently has like a Nazi tattoo. | ||
| He's just covered up. | ||
| And, you know, they're like, yeah, he portrays himself as this sort of downhome country boy from Maine. | ||
| You know, he grew up lower class, but it's like, no, it turns out he is like a multi-millionaire, comes from like a very, very rich family. | ||
| And it's just like, obviously, it's weird. | ||
| It's weird. | ||
| Same thing with Beto, right? | ||
| Same thing with Mamdani. | ||
| He's like literally like a Ugandan rich kid that was like a Nepo baby SoundCloud rapper for a while. | ||
| Like he's just, he's just a weirdo who doesn't actually believe or stand for anything. | ||
| He's like, says he's Muslim, but he is taking pictures with drag queens. | ||
| And it's like you're just a disruptor. | ||
| You're just an invader. | ||
| You're just a scumbag. | ||
| You don't believe anything. | ||
| You're not a real person. | ||
| There are these compilations going around showing all the different ways he talks. | ||
| But it's the same thing with Jasmine Crockett. | ||
| It's the same thing with Kamala Harris. | ||
| It's the same thing with all of them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're all just complete frauds. | |
| I mean, the guy in Maine, it's like he's a, you know, the commercial will say, you know, he, the progressive guy who grew up just down the road from you in Maine. | ||
| And it's like, actually, he's an ultra-wealthy Nazi, but it doesn't matter. | ||
| They'll still vote for him. | ||
| Like, it just doesn't matter. | ||
| Zoran Mamdani, you know, homegrown New York City kids. | ||
| Like actually his family has a compound in Uganda and he's just like nothing. | ||
| He's just nothing. | ||
| But it doesn't matter to them. | ||
| So, you know, it's weird because it's almost like why wouldn't they just be honest? | ||
| If it doesn't matter to the voting public, why do you portray yourself as something that you're not? | ||
| But it's this weird thing with the left where they just want you to pretend. | ||
| And once you pretend, they'll pretend to believe that. | ||
| Do you know what I mean? | ||
| Where like, you know, it to me sort of goes along with this idea where like if they have something that they can point to. | ||
| As a reason they believe something, then you you'll never you'll never convince them otherwise. | ||
| You'll never be able to argue them into a logical standpoint. | ||
| I don't know if I'm I don't know if I'm explaining this very well. | ||
| Yeah, Zoran Mamdani celebrates wedding with three day bash in lavish Uganda estate. | ||
| I mean, there's something where it was like somebody insults Zoran Mamdani. | ||
| He responds from his compounded Uganda. | ||
| And it's like, OK, is is a supervillain running for mayor of New York? | ||
| Is that what's happening? | ||
| Anybody with a compound in Uganda has no place being a politician in America. | ||
| But that's just me. | ||
| But it's almost like. | ||
| You know, like. | ||
| Leftists know that Trump was never convicted of rape, but they'll call him a convicted rapist because some judge somewhere decided just said, yeah, I'm you know. | ||
| I'm just sort of. | ||
| Yeah, I'm doing that. | ||
| And I go, OK. | ||
| I'm declaring Trump is guilty. | ||
| I'm declaring that actually he did rape somebody and it was never proven. | ||
| There was never a court case. | ||
| They shouldn't actually be able to say that. | ||
| But because some guy, some some judge somewhere said it, therefore it is true. | ||
| And even if you point out that it was never, it doesn't matter to them. | ||
| It doesn't actually matter. | ||
| So, like, if this guy can portray himself as a progressive and a Islamic person and a radical LGBTQer, if none of it's true, it's all of it's true. | ||
| It doesn't really matter. | ||
| They just need a thing to pretend to believe in. | ||
| That makes sense. | ||
| Because otherwise they would they would change. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| Who would have thought electing a rapist would have complicated release for the Epstein files? | ||
| Yeah, see, he's a rapist. | ||
| You can call him that because some judge somewhere decided that he was. | ||
| That's just how it works. | ||
| You know, they can make laws off of the statement that white supremacy is the biggest threat. | ||
| It doesn't mean anything. | ||
| It's not true. | ||
| It's just someone said it somewhere. | ||
| They can pretend to believe it because it's useful to them to pretend to believe. | ||
| You get what I'm saying about this, because if it actually mattered, if they were actually. | ||
| You know, I just go back to the Beto O'Rourke man on the street segment that I did, where there were three things that people pretended to love about Beto O'Rourke. | ||
| They loved that he was like just a regular guy, bootstrapped himself. | ||
| You know, he just he's a small business owner. | ||
| He didn't take PAC money and he was Hispanic. | ||
| So he understands the, you know, Hispanic, the struggles of Mexican-Americans or whatever. | ||
| And I would ask people, OK, is this what you like about Beto? | ||
| These three things they'd say. | ||
| Yep, that's those are the three reasons I like him. | ||
| And then I'd point out, OK, well, his number one contributor is, in fact, a PAC. | ||
| He does take PAC money. | ||
| That's a lie. | ||
| That's one out of three of the things you liked about him. | ||
| He's a billionaire, by the way. | ||
| He married a billionaire heiress. | ||
| And the company that he ran was just a side project her dad paid for. | ||
| OK, so he's not actually he's not actually a poor person. | ||
| He's not actually, you know, a bootstrap regular guy. | ||
| He's a billionaire and he is not Mexican. | ||
| He goes by Beto just literally explicitly to pander to Mexican people. | ||
| His dad was a judge and was interviewed about his son, Beto. | ||
| And he said, yeah, I want to name him Robert so we could call him Beto because that would get him votes in the Mexican community. | ||
| The man was literally named. | ||
| His name was a political stunt. | ||
| The man was christened with a name designed to be a dishonest, cynical ploy to get votes. | ||
| That's how, you know, died-in-the-wool political guy this is. | ||
| But, you know, he presented himself as this outsider, as a small business owner. | ||
| None of it was true, but none of it mattered. | ||
| None of it mattered. | ||
| So I don't know what is behind that democratic mindset, but it's a fact. | ||
| It's a reality. | ||
| It's a constant. | ||
| And we have to understand it if we want to actually defeat them. | ||
| You can expose lies about their candidates. | ||
| They don't care, actually. | ||
| They'll continue to believe the lie, even when exposed to the truth. | ||
| It's very troubling, but it's a very common thing. | ||
| Anyway, I say all of this because I do think the mayoral competition in New York is a bellwether for what's happening in the rest of the country. | ||
| It's concerning. | ||
| It in and of itself is going to have an impact on the American economy as a whole, especially with all of the big corporations for now still located in New York. | ||
| That might not last very long, but I'm sure they'll do some sort of exit tax where they'll try to bankrupt you if you attempt to leave the state, which again, I can't, I do not understand how that's constitutional. | ||
| California has that too. | ||
| But Cuomo actually put out an ad. | ||
| He put out an AI-generated ad about Mamdani. | ||
| It's very good. | ||
| It's actually a fantastic ad, but I guess somebody criticized it, and so Cuomo deleted it. | ||
| He never should have. | ||
| It's actually a great ad, and it lays out very, very compelling arguments as to why Mom Dani would be a terrible choice for New Yorkers. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 17 here. | ||
| This is the ad the Andrew Cuomo campaign was too cowardly to leave up. | ||
| Let's watch it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Zoron Momdani's opponents want you to believe he's an inexperienced radical whose policies will make New York City more dangerous. | |
| But what do his actual supporters think? | ||
| Mom Danny isn't crazy. | ||
| He's just trying to even the playing field. | ||
| You know, give everyone a fair shot. | ||
| Sure, he said multiple times we need to defund the police, but that was just a metaphor. | ||
| And yes, he did say crime is a social construct, but that was also a metaphor. | ||
| His main backer, the Democratic socialists' ideas are common sense, such as decriminalizing misdemeanors like shoplifting, third-degree assault, trespassing, prostitution, and drunk driving. | ||
| With plans to decriminalize all drugs, Mam Donnie will be a job creator for drug dealers. | ||
| Instead of helping us homeless get off the streets and into the mental health facilities we need, he wants to give us safe injection sites to do crack and let us sleep in subway carts. | ||
| These are actual policies Mom Donnie and the DSA want to implement on day one. | ||
| When a woman's being domestically abused, she finally won't have to deal with some pesky cop to arrest the abuser, but now a social worker to help, you know, kumbaya in the situation. | ||
| Breathe in. | ||
| Breathe out. | ||
| Mom Donnie is finally lowering jail sentences. | ||
| Guilty! | ||
| But Mom Donnie says you're free to go. | ||
| Woohoo! | ||
| Who cares if legalizing prostitution statistically leads to an increase for sex trafficking of women and young girls by 70%? | ||
| You can't have safety without equality. | ||
| For unlawful abiding citizens like us, globalize the Intifada. | ||
| I'm a criminal. | ||
| I'm a criminal. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| I'm a criminal. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For Zorong. | |
| For Zara and Mom Donny! | ||
| I didn't have a real job until I was 30, but sure, give me the keys to the city. | ||
| What's the worst that can happen? | ||
| Paid for by Cuomo for NYC. | ||
| It's a great ad. | ||
| Why would you take that down? | ||
| Why did he take that down? | ||
| Let's find out why he took that down because that was a great ad. | ||
| Was somebody insulted by that? | ||
| Was somebody offended? | ||
| Did a criminal get offended? | ||
| Did a human trafficker feel targeted by that? | ||
| I wonder. | ||
| He's exactly right. | ||
| And it goes to what Caroline Levitt was saying and got a lot of crap for a few days ago, where she's like, the constituency of the Democrats are Hamas members and terrorists and drug dealers. | ||
| And people got mad at her for that. | ||
| It's like, okay, look at what they're doing. | ||
| I mean, they shut down the government and have shut it down for like nearly a month at this point because they want illegal immigrants to get health care. | ||
| Okay, so their constituency is illegal immigrants. | ||
| There's no Americans that are helped by that. | ||
| That's not their concern. | ||
| They don't care. | ||
| They're not trying to make life easier for the working people of this country. | ||
| They're not trying to make life easier for families or women who want to have babies. | ||
| They make it more difficult for them. | ||
| No, their constituency, that is the people they care about and serve and pass laws on the behalf of, are the worst people in our society. | ||
| Pretty much to a person. | ||
| Whether that's, you know, and that was my thing is, you know, she's like, oh, it's Hamas and it's drug dealers and it's this. | ||
| And it's like, well, let's not forget, you know, welfare queens, the indigent, you know, transsexuals, children, transsexual children, pedophiles. | ||
| Like, they serve them too. | ||
| They're always ready and willing to serve the interest of, again, just the worst people in our society and perhaps the world. | ||
| Oh, it was a racist AI ad. | ||
| Oh, it was racist, was it? | ||
| What was racist about that? | ||
| Let's scroll down. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
| Let's see what we got here. | ||
| Official X account posts and then deletes AI generated attack ad that prompted widespread denunciation. | ||
| What? | ||
| From who? | ||
| New York City Mayor, hopeful Andrew Cuomo has been widely labeled as racist after his widely labeled as racist. | ||
| That doesn't mean anything. | ||
| I'd like to let you know right now that doesn't mean anything. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| Hey, watch this. | ||
| Mamdani is a racist. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| There. | ||
| Now, if three more people say that, then we can say that Mamdani has been widely labeled a racist because it doesn't mean anything. | ||
| Criminals from Zoro and Mamdani, not even 20 minutes into the second married debate, Cuomo's official account tweeted the video. | ||
| It was reshared many times before being deleted. | ||
| Cuomo and Mamdani did not immediately respond. | ||
| The video, which has been saved and reshared, runs a little over two minutes and opens with an AI iteration of Mamdani first running through the streets of New York and then eating rice with his hands. | ||
| Is that the racist thing? | ||
| Because he does eat rice with his hands. | ||
| Is it racist to depict reality? | ||
| Yes, it is. | ||
| It goes on to show a black man in Akifa shoplifting, a man abusing a woman, a sex trafficker, a drug dealer, and others all showing their support for Mamdani. | ||
| Okay, what? | ||
| They weren't all white. | ||
| Is that the issue? | ||
| They weren't all white. | ||
| Only most of them were white. | ||
| Is that the problem? | ||
| Only the bad people. | ||
| Well, no, the bad people were also right. | ||
| White. | ||
| A black man dressed as a pimp trafficking a car full of white women. | ||
| Cuomo needs to be thrown in the ash heap of history. | ||
| Wait, who said this? | ||
| Hold on, scroll up, scroll up, hold on, I want to see this. | ||
| Who said that? | ||
| Shannon Watts, the founder of Moms Demand Action, a grassroots organization that advocates for gun violence prevention, called it so gross and full of racist stereotypes, including a black man dressed like a pimp trafficking a car full of white women. | ||
| Okay, what? | ||
| So what do you say? | ||
| I don't even understand what that is. | ||
| Is that a racist stereotype that black men like white women or that they traffic white women? | ||
| That they're pimps. | ||
| I don't understand what the outrage is there. | ||
| It should have been a white guy. | ||
| She would have been fine if it was a white pimp trafficking black women. | ||
| Would that have been better? | ||
| That would have been better, I guess. | ||
| Algiers fault lines pointed to the imagery of the Kifa and add-on X. How are Palestinian New Yorkers supposed to feel about this? | ||
| Or do they not matter? | ||
| I can't, I mean, this is the type of stuff. | ||
| It's like, what even is the outrage? | ||
| And why would you bend to it? | ||
| They're going to remake it where all the criminals are black. | ||
| Is that what they're going to do? | ||
| You know, in the same way that, you know, they want boardrooms to reflect the real population. | ||
| Maybe we need commercials that reflect the real prison population. | ||
| Maybe that's what we need to do. | ||
| So yeah, the one thing that Cuomo does that would actually make me like him, making this cool and funny commercial, he immediately backs down on and denounces. | ||
| Okay, great. | ||
| All right, great. | ||
| Well, so you're a coward on top of everything else, huh? | ||
| As if we needed to know more about why Cuomo is not the right choice. | ||
| So yeah, for our New York viewers, you know, I have a lot of people who are out there going, I talked to people on the streets and nobody likes Mamdoni. | ||
| I mean, there was somebody today that was posting saying he cannot find somebody that likes Mamdoni. | ||
| Clearly, he's got some support. | ||
| But I wonder if it's as high up as we want. | ||
| All right, so I've seen two black guys. | ||
| Hold on. | ||
| Should we count the races? | ||
| Guys, we got to figure out how racist this is. | ||
| All right. | ||
| A black guy shoplifting. | ||
| Obviously racist. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Zoran Mamdani is not white, so that's racist. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| That's two. | ||
| Hello. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So black guy stealing. | ||
| All right. | ||
| There's a white guy. | ||
| There's a white guy. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| This guy's. | ||
| He's not fully black. | ||
| That's a half white guy. | ||
| I'm going to give him a half. | ||
| I'm going to give him a half. | ||
| All right. | ||
| That's a white woman. | ||
| There's another white man. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah, as you know, New York City, mostly white people are the criminals. | ||
| It's mostly white people committing crimes. | ||
| These are the same people. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So we have one and a half black people, and the rest of them are white. | ||
| And this is horrifying and outrageous and racist, according to dumbass communists. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, home. | |
| Homeless guy. | ||
| Okay, so the Pimp's Puerto Rican. | ||
| That's not white. | ||
| All right, but the homeless guy's white. | ||
| He's talking about being a criminal. | ||
| So that's another one. | ||
| So is that the same black guy as before it is, right? | ||
| He's wearing the Kifa. | ||
| Okay, so that still counts as one. | ||
| Now we're figuring this out, folks. | ||
| Clearly, this is important. | ||
| Clearly, this was important enough to take down the ad. | ||
| So, you know, we can't make this mistake again. | ||
| Oh, they're the social workers white. | ||
| What does that say? | ||
| The judge is white. | ||
| That's kind of racist. | ||
| You're saying a black woman can't be judge, Cuomo? | ||
| How dare you? | ||
| Yeah, guy's Puerto Rican. | ||
| That's a different guy. | ||
| What race is the lead singer of Outcast? | ||
| I'm pretty sure he's whatever that is. | ||
| Oh, look, a white guy burning an American flag. | ||
| All right. | ||
| So we have one and a half black people. | ||
| One, two, three, four, five, six and a half white people. | ||
| And that's racist, apparently. | ||
| Hey, the pimp was white in that shot. | ||
| So, yeah, okay. | ||
| So they just, they call that racist for some reason. | ||
| Even though everything, and for our radio listeners, if you're hearing that ad, for every claim they made, they actually showed an article or the law itself showing exactly, you know, what they're talking about. | ||
| They aren't just making this stuff up. | ||
| The things that they claimed, letting criminals out of prison, no longer charging drunk driving, like all of those have an article to go along with it showing you they're not just making things up. | ||
| This is actually the things that they're proposing for New York City. | ||
| You would think people would be able to tell for themselves that a mayor that wants to let everybody out of prison and decriminalize petty theft is not going to be a good person to run your city, but I don't know. | ||
| But I guess people are going along with this. | ||
| What even is the argument? | ||
| I mean, everything I've seen from Zoram Amdani, he's literally just like, every proposal is terrible. | ||
| Every proposal sounds retarded, asinine. | ||
| He's just like, we're going to take over public buildings. | ||
| We're going to take over private buildings and make them public. | ||
| We're going to have city-run grocery stores. | ||
| And it's like all of this pie in the sky stuff that sounds good if you've never read history, sounds good if you've never tried to run a business. | ||
| I can make anything sound good. | ||
| Is that what it takes? | ||
| Can I run for mayor and promise just like complete BS and just get elected? | ||
| Ice cream fountains on every corner. | ||
| Like that really is the level that we're at. | ||
| When in reality, it's like, how about before we do the city-run grocery stores, before we do the, you know, whatever else LGBT pride parade, how about you try to make it so people aren't being lit on fire in the subway? | ||
| Can we start with that? | ||
| Let's start with the human immolation on the subways that are occurring. | ||
| How about the horrific crimes? | ||
| How about once people stop getting macheted in the head on the streets of New York, then we can talk about all the wonderful things you're promising for us. | ||
| How about first you do the bare minimum to have just a functional city, then you worry about all of the prizes and gifts for all of your supporters? | ||
| Because people are still being murdered on the subway at a regular clip. | ||
| So gotta help New York City. | ||
| Can the guys from Outcast be mayor? | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of The War Room is on. | ||
| I have some very interesting things to discuss with you, including some breaking news, breaking revelation from Steve Bannon. | ||
| Of course, JD Vance left Israel today. | ||
| Rubio will arrive tomorrow. | ||
| So I guess this is a rare 24-hour moment where we don't have a representative at the highest level of American government bowing to the wall. | ||
| But there's been, again, sort of signs of the division in the Trump administration and the Israel administration. | ||
| Israel would, quote, lose all support from the U.S. if it annexes West Bank, Trump warns, seemingly putting the kibosh on Israel's right, the Israel rights dream of applying sovereignty to parts of the West Bank. | ||
| Oh my God. | ||
| All right. | ||
| This is from the Times of Israel. | ||
| Do we need to do a little editing? | ||
| Do we need to do a little editing? | ||
| Isn't this such an Orwellian way of phrasing this, applying sovereignty to parts of the West Bank? | ||
| What they mean is forcibly cleansing, ethnically cleansing and annexing. | ||
| That's what it means when it says applying sovereignty. | ||
| It's just so Orwellian. | ||
| Seemingly putting the kibosh on Israel, the Israeli rights dream of forcibly, ethnically cleansing and annexing parts of the West Bank. | ||
| U.S. President Donald Trump has said Israel would lose all support from the United States if it tried to move ahead with annexation. | ||
| The comment published Thursday by Time magazine was made by Trump during an October 15th interview prior to the Knesset's passage on Wednesday in a preliminary reading and against the prime minister's wishes of a bill that would apply Israel sovereignty to all the West Bank settlements, underlining this administration's lack of patience for such efforts. | ||
| Trump's deputy, J.D. Vance, said Thursday as he departed Israel that the previous day's vote had offended him and was very stupid. | ||
| And so Trump, again, he came out publicly and said this. | ||
| This wasn't something that was referenced or written about. | ||
| This was Trump himself looking into the camera and saying West Bank annexation will not happen. | ||
| That's him putting his name on it, putting his foot down, and sort of challenging Israel to try it, right? | ||
| Because you could say, well, we're talking about that. | ||
| Well, yeah, I know they really want the West Bank, but we'll see. | ||
| That's going to be a part of it. | ||
| He could have said any of those things. | ||
| What he said was, this will not happen. | ||
| I will not allow it. | ||
| And in response to that, while J.D. Vance was in Israel, the Israeli Knesset voted to annex the West Bank. | ||
| The West Bank settlements are illegal under international law. | ||
| Again, we've had weird cognitive dissonance from the Trump administration about this, where you have, well, and really the Republican Party overall, where you have like Mike Johnson going to the West Bank, making videos in the West Bank with some of the settlement leaders saying, yeah, all of this is going to be Israeli. | ||
| We're very much in favor of that. | ||
| At the exact same time, the Trump administration is saying, no, that's not going to happen. | ||
| It's totally illegal. | ||
| It's a violation of international law. | ||
| So again, a little bit of inconsistency there, a little bit of dissonance between the two. | ||
| There's more information from this Time magazine article that's very interesting. | ||
| But obviously, with their dreams of Gaza annexation hitting some rough water and not going as smoothly as I think the Likud party would prefer, they've moved a lot of their attention to the illegal settlements in the West Bank and expanding those. | ||
| We showed you the video earlier this week of the Palestinian old woman being beaten on the head by an Israeli extremist with a club as they, again, you know, forcibly annex this area, which by international law, they have no right to. | ||
| The UN recorded 71 settler attacks in just one week across occupied West Bank. | ||
| So we're averaging over 10 attacks a day in this tiny area of concentrated terroristic activity by the Zionist settlers, colonialists. | ||
| The attacks, many of them armed, resulted in the death of one man and the injury of 99 others, as documented by the U.N. Office of Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. | ||
| Most of the settlers, most of the settler assaults hit farming areas just as the olive harvest began, affecting 27 Palestinian villages, nearly half of all the reported attacks tied to that harvest, which started on the 9th of October. | ||
| So, of course, trying to destroy their livelihood. | ||
| So, that's what's happening in Israel as they also launched a bombing campaign against southern Lebanon today, claiming to be targeting Hezbollah infrastructure. | ||
| I believe we actually clip number seven here. | ||
| This was earlier today, the Israeli Air Force striking Hezbollah terror infrastructure in Lebanon right now, which again is also what we told you, right? | ||
| When Gaza wasn't going to be their playground of genocide anymore, we go, okay, well, that means they're going to try to start something with Iran or they're going to increase the attacks against Lebanon. | ||
| But it really is, it really is like Israel is like a drug addict. | ||
| Like, war is its drug, and it like can't go a day without it. | ||
| And if it can't get the heroin, it's looking for the crack. | ||
| Like, if it can't be killing Gazans, who am I going to kill? | ||
| Who can I kill? | ||
| Lebanon, we'll just keep beating up on Lebanon forever. | ||
| The Palestinians in the West Bank, who are just an endless pinata for Israel to beat. | ||
| It's like, well, who these people, man. | ||
| I mean, honestly, it is insane. | ||
| And with this statement from the Trump administration, including J.D. Vance, saying this is not a smart move, voting to annex the West Bank, as a deliberate slap in the face of the Trump administration, right? | ||
| Oh, you don't want us to do this? | ||
| Well, then guess what we're going to do? | ||
| And they go and vote to do this. | ||
| And J.D. Vance responds and says, you know, we're not going to allow this. | ||
| And there's people online going, who are you to tell Israel what we can and can't do? | ||
| And it's like, bitch, you're master. | ||
| That's who we are. | ||
| The reason you're here, that's who we are. | ||
| We're your fathers. | ||
| So you obey us. | ||
| That is how this relationship should go. | ||
| We created you. | ||
| We can end you. | ||
| And frankly, you're getting a little spoiled. | ||
| We've spared the rod and we're spoiling the child. | ||
| That's how the relationship between America and Israel should be. | ||
| They should do what we say because they depend on us for everything. | ||
| Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. | ||
| And we put up with this. | ||
| All we want on our side of the aisle is an American government that's American and that values America and does things for America's benefit. | ||
| And when some little genocidal ethnostate on the crappy end of the Mediterranean starts mouthing off, we should stomp them into dust. | ||
| Like that is just how this should work. | ||
| It's how this should be. | ||
| It's not because the obvious overwhelming and overt control of the American government that the Israeli mafia has been able to achieve over the last several decades, it's not going to go on for that much longer. | ||
| I'm just letting everybody know it's not going to last that much longer. | ||
| How it ends is entirely up to them, whether this is a, you know, peaceful recapturing of the American Republic for the benefit of the American people or whether Israel is going to try to take the whole world down with them. | ||
| I guess that's up to them. | ||
| But at least we have a president now making demands that are in opposition to the Israeli desires and aren't just folding the instant that Israel betrays us, as they always do. | ||
| So let's go to a video of this. | ||
| This is clip 10, Vice President J.D. Vance on this Knesset vote on West Bank annexation. | ||
| Again, just a diplomatic spitting in our face. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When I asked about it, somebody told me that it was a political stunt, that it had no practical significance. | |
| It was purely symbolic. | ||
| I mean, look, if it was a political stunt, it was a very stupid political stunt. | ||
| And I personally take some insult to it. | ||
| The West Bank is not going to be annexed by Israel. | ||
| The policy of the Trump administration is that the West Bank will not be annexed by Israel. | ||
| That will continue to be our policy. | ||
| And if people want to take symbolic votes, they can do that. | ||
| But we certainly weren't happy about it. | ||
| Again, great to see. | ||
| I mean, even, you know, even if it's not how I would respond necessarily, it's certainly closer to my stance than anything else we've heard from American administrations for my entire lifetime. | ||
| So that's good to see. | ||
| Some standing up against it. | ||
| But the other talking point that's being thrown around these days, and it really is interesting how the pro-Zionists, the Israeli talking heads on X really conform to whatever the message of the day is, and they all say exactly the same thing. | ||
| And it may be the same topic that they previously talked about, but they'll all have a different stance on it now. | ||
| So like previously, if you talked about the money that we sent to Israel, they would say, well, actually, that's just benefiting American companies, right? | ||
| That's all American stuff. | ||
| So they're not actually giving money to Israel. | ||
| They're just giving money to American companies. | ||
| And that was retarded in the first place because it's like saying, I'm going to give you $20,000 and then you give me that $20,000 and I give you a car. | ||
| All that's happened is I've given you a car. | ||
| So like how you can be like, but I paid you $20,000 of your own money. | ||
| No, we just gave you, yeah, we give you weaponry for free. | ||
| And they try to portray that as if it's a benefit for America somehow. | ||
| Now, the new talking point, they don't say that much anymore. | ||
| Now what they're all saying, and we heard Ted Cruz say this in a speech yesterday, is that actually it's a bargain because we get access to Mossad's information for our measly $3 billion a year. | ||
| For $3 billion a year, we get access to something that would cost us 10 times as much to build ourselves. | ||
| And it's like, how many ways is this a ridiculous claim? | ||
| For one thing, it's not $3 billion a year. | ||
| It's been $23 billion in the last two years, and that's just the on-the-books official from one government to another transfer of money, not including all the NGOs and all the whatever else that we send them. | ||
| So, okay, the amount that you're saying is something like one-tenth of what it actually is. | ||
| Also, Mossad lies to us endlessly, and the information they do provide us is almost always false, including during the Hamas negotiations, where we showed the clip yesterday. | ||
| Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are saying, we're in contact with Hamas. | ||
| They're accepting the deal, but we're getting intel from the CIA and Mossad. | ||
| Since we keep hearing about how we don't have intelligence in the Middle East and we have to depend on Mossad for it, I'm going to assume the information they were getting was probably not sourced to the CIA, but was rather trafficked through the CIA by Mossad, saying Hamas is never going to accept this. | ||
| You should pull the agreement off the table and not go along with it. | ||
| They were lying. | ||
| They were lying. | ||
| They were providing false information. | ||
| Okay, so $3 billion, we get this amazing information from Mossad. | ||
| Okay, it's more like $23 billion, and the information is almost always lies. | ||
| And they depend on us just as much, if not significantly more, than we depend on them. | ||
| And we don't need that information anyway. | ||
| And we wouldn't need any information anyway because there wouldn't be wars there anyway, not to the degree or in the way that they are if Israel wasn't starting all of the wars. | ||
| So it's like, oh, they help us solve a problem they started, but it still costs us billions of dollars. | ||
| Great. | ||
| Just incredible. | ||
| Ted Cruz says $3 billion the United States sends Israel each year is actually a bargain because in return, America gets lied to endlessly. | ||
| So isn't that a bargain? | ||
| Isn't it a bargain that we get all of this fake information that leads us into wars like the weapons of mass destruction? | ||
| What would we do without that? | ||
| So all we have to do is pay a measly $3 billion or whatever, $23 billion, and then we get access to lies that get us into wars that cost us a trillion dollars. | ||
| Thanks, Ted. | ||
| Thanks, Ted Cruz. | ||
| You absolute traitor. | ||
| And actually, we have a couple developments in this regard. | ||
| Some more clips from the interview that we did show yesterday with Jared Kushner and Witkoff, where they were talking about the way that they were getting fake information, incorrect information from the intelligence communities that was contradicted by their own on-the-ground first-hand knowledge of the situation. | ||
| We also had, oh, maybe I definitely thought I put it in there. | ||
| Maybe I didn't. | ||
| Shoot. | ||
| I might not have actually downloaded that. | ||
| Oh, yeah, no, there it is. | ||
| Clip number five. | ||
| Let's go to clip number five here because this is another very interesting thing that people noticed. | ||
| Watch Jared Kushner's face when Steve Witkoff announces that everything happening in Gaza is in line with a plan that started two years ago. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, part of the plan is the reconstruction, the building, rebuilding of Gaza. | |
| And you're builders. | ||
| You've been in real estate. | ||
| As you said, it's extremely complex. | ||
| Tell us more about the plan and how much it's going to cost. | ||
| Where's the money going to come from? | ||
| And who's going to award the contracts? | ||
| Three questions. | ||
| I think it's going to cost a lot of money. | ||
| What's a lot of money? | ||
| You know, the estimates are in the $50 billion range. | ||
| It might be a little bit less. | ||
| It might be a little bit more. | ||
| I happen to think that that's not a lot of money in that region. | ||
| You have governments that are going to jump on in. | ||
| So the Middle East countries are going to provide the money. | ||
| You'll see European participation and so forth. | ||
| I think the beginning of this plan is how to get it going. | ||
| And that's what me and Jared work on all the time. | ||
| The money raising, we think, is the easy part. | ||
| We think that happens relatively quickly. | ||
| But it's the master plan. | ||
| And we're working with a group of people who have been working on master plans for the last two years. | ||
| So there are plans already. | ||
| We have plans already. | ||
| We have a master plan already. | ||
| And by the way, and Jared's been pushing this, and we're working together on it. | ||
| And I think if the world saw the progress so far, they'd be pretty impressed. | ||
| Oh, so impressed. | ||
| We're so impressed. | ||
| Were you watching Coach Kushner during that? | ||
| He didn't seem like he was too thrilled about Steve Witkoff announcing that they'd been working with a group of people who'd been working on a master plan for two years at this point, that all of this is in line. | ||
| Kushner's like, well, it's like, huh, two years, huh? | ||
| That puts you around October 2023. | ||
| Okay, so you're saying this whole war has been in the pursuit of a master plan to annex and control Gaza. | ||
| Wow, fascinating. | ||
| This is the first time hearing of this. | ||
| Yeah, no, we know. | ||
| No, we're aware. | ||
| We are well aware of the Greater Israel Project and the necessity to expel and forcibly depopulate the Gaza Strip so it can be annexed into Israel. | ||
| No, we know. | ||
| We know about the master plan. | ||
| Don't you worry about that. | ||
| You're just not supposed to talk about it. | ||
| Sort of interferes with the master plan if you go around telling everybody about the master plan, Steve. | ||
| Okay, so there from Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner. | ||
| Not that he wanted to be a part of it, but is confirmation that basically everything happening in Gaza right now, or at least the annexation of Gaza, was all part of a master plan designed around the time that the war in Gaza started, around the time that they allowed the invasion of Israel and the October 7th attack to continue unabated for hours on end, giving them the excuse they needed to go into Gaza. | ||
| So it was all sort of planned from the beginning, wasn't it? | ||
| So in the Time magazine article where they talked about Trump making some of the statements about the West Bank, there's some other interesting responses that he gave. | ||
| He was asked, quote, you've been in office for less than one year, Mr. President, in the second term, and the region, the Middle East, has already been transformed. | ||
| One way of putting it. | ||
| Hezbollah's leadership has been decimated. | ||
| Bashir al-Assad has been replaced by government seeking normalization. | ||
| And Trump interrupts and says, and you know, all of those attacks were done in auspices with, actually, with me directly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh. | |
| So you're a terrorist? | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| President Trump, look, I'm like the top terrorist. | ||
| Look, you know, the pager attack where Israel caused every pager in Lebanon to explode, maiming and killing thousands of innocent people because it was just a widespread, totally undirected attack against anybody that happened to get their hands on one of these pagers. | ||
| Yeah, that was me, actually. | ||
| Actually, I'm the reason, just like I'm the reason they bombed Qatar, even though I'm mad at that, I did take credit for it. | ||
| It's like, what are you doing, dude? | ||
| It's the same thing they keep doing. | ||
| Clearly, you're not in charge of this situation, Trump. | ||
| That's fine. | ||
| We know that. | ||
| It's actually worse for you to pretend that you are. | ||
| I know this is not how his brain works. | ||
| His brain recognizes that when you have this obnoxious little murderous chihuahua, Israel, leading you around, it doesn't look great. | ||
| It doesn't look great if the president of the United States is making promises, and then those promises are being betrayed. | ||
| He's in negotiations, then Israel kills the negotiators. | ||
| He's working something out with Qatar. | ||
| Qatar gets bombed. | ||
| He's, you know, why would you want to put your name on the Pager attack against Hezbollah? | ||
| That's crazy. | ||
| That is genuinely crazy. | ||
| Why would you want to take credit for the Bashir al-Assad government being overthrown when they've been replaced with al-Qaeda, who are currently carrying out massacres against the minority populations in that country? | ||
| Why do you keep taking credit for the terror, sir? | ||
| It doesn't make any sense. | ||
| He's like, yeah, that was me with the pagers and all that stuff. | ||
| He says, and you know, all those attacks were done in auspices with, actually, with me directly. | ||
| You know, with Israel doing the attacks with the pagers and all that stuff. | ||
| So they had, look, they'd been, Israel's been very respectful of this country and they let me know everything. | ||
| And sometimes I'd say no, and they'd be respectful of that, but Obama treated Israel so badly. | ||
| So like, I'm pretty sure I understand his motivation here. | ||
| I'm pretty sure I understand that he's saying the opposite of what he's saying. | ||
| What he's saying is Israel keeps disrespecting him. | ||
| He keeps telling Israel not to do stuff and they do it anyway. | ||
| And his response to that is, say, actually everything they do, they approve through me first. | ||
| They won't do anything without my approval because I'm Mr. Big Dick. | ||
| And it's like, so you're a terrorist then, dummy. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| So you gave approval for a bunch of kids and innocent people not involved in Hezbollah, doctors wearing pagers, being horribly maimed for life. | ||
| That was you. | ||
| You did that? | ||
| Great. | ||
| Thanks, sir. | ||
| It's just insane. | ||
| But I think that's pretty simple psychology, you know, motivating him. | ||
| Now, there's been some breaking news from Steve Bannon. | ||
| And it's sort of in line with what we're talking about. | ||
| It sort of makes the most sense when you understand that, you know, Trump has, I think, for his own sort of power and self-aggrandizement, he has dedicated himself to the cause of Israel because in return, they'll made him president and will continue to keep him in power. | ||
| Here's Steve Bannon talking about how Trump intends to run for a third term in office. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Well, he's going to get a third term. | ||
| So Trump 28. | ||
| Trump is going to be president of 28, and people just ought to get accommodated with that. | ||
| So what about the 22nd Amendment? | ||
| There's many different alternatives. | ||
| At the appropriate time, we'll lay out what the plan is. | ||
| But there's a plan, and President Trump will be the president in 28. | ||
| We had longer odds in 2016 and longer odds in 24 than we got in 28. | ||
| And President Trump will be the president of the United States, and the country needs him to be president of the United States. | ||
| We have to finish what we started. | ||
| And the way we finish it through Trump. | ||
| Trump is a vehicle. | ||
| I know this will drive you guys crazy, but he's a vehicle of divine providence. | ||
| He's an instrument. | ||
| He's very imperfect. | ||
| He's not churchy, not particularly religious, but he's an instrument of divine will. | ||
| And you can tell this of how we've, how he's pulled this off. | ||
| We need him for at least one more term, right? | ||
| And he'll get that in 28. | ||
| You're not driving me crazy. | ||
| I'm really simple. | ||
| I'm trying to understand the coherence of the things you've just told me in the last few minutes. | ||
| On the one hand, you've said the Constitution is fit for purpose. | ||
| Secondly, you've said that President Trump needs another term, even though the 22nd Amendment makes pretty clear that he cannot have a second term. | ||
| Why does it make that clear? | ||
| Because he's on his second term already. | ||
| At some point in time, we will make sure we go through Zani and define all those terms. | ||
| But even if you find a way to undermine the, you will be undermining the spirit of that amendment, even if you find some way around it. | ||
| And to those people who can. | ||
| Can the American people, can the American people, if the American people with the mechanisms we have put Trump back in office, are the American people tearing up the constitutional? | ||
| Would that be tearing up? | ||
| Would the American people be going against the spirit of the Constitution, ma'am? | ||
| I think yes, actually, because I think what you will end up with is a populist justification for a quasi-dictatorship. | ||
| That's not true at all. | ||
| Trump works. | ||
| That's what it sounds like. | ||
| Trump is a dictatorship. | ||
| Did you just see the compromises he had to make on the big, beautiful bill? | ||
| You see the compromises he has to do on everything, on accommodating Zelensky, on what President Trump, President Trump is nothing but a series of negotiations to kind of keep this thing rolling forward where he's having trade-offs all the time. | ||
| You've just spent the last 20 minutes telling me we have to smash the other side. | ||
| There's no room for debate. | ||
| There's no room for compromise. | ||
| We must smash them. | ||
| And now you're telling me this is a negotiation. | ||
| I mean, that's the first time. | ||
| Steve Bannon announcing there's a plan to install Trump in a third term. | ||
| Steve Bannon claims Trump, quote, will be the president for a third term and Inner Circle has a plan. | ||
| So we'll see about that. | ||
| I don't even know how I feel about that. | ||
| How old is Trump going to be at that point? | ||
| That even a good move. | ||
| Come on, guys. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| One of the things we don't like about the establishment is they don't know when to leave. | ||
| They don't know how to prepare the next generation to pick up the torch. | ||
| Now. | ||
| So I don't know how I feel about that, but very interesting statement from Steve Bannon. | ||
| Let's go to this video. | ||
| It's just broke minutes ago. | ||
| Trump is actually asked if he is going to rebuild the third temple. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Thank you, Carolyn. | ||
| Hi, Jake. | ||
| And then we'll go to you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Two quick questions. | |
| Back to the ballroom. | ||
| It is a very spectacular ballroom, according to the renderings. | ||
| And if it's half as nice as the one in Mar-a-Lago, then future presidents are really going to appreciate it. | ||
| They will. | ||
| First of all, is there like an official name? | ||
| Like, are we calling it the Trump Ballroom, or does the president have a vision for what the name for the ballroom is going to be? | ||
| There will be an official name. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I will let the president announce that once he sits on the Charlie Kirk ballroom. | |
| Question. | ||
| So, you know, looking at these renderings, and it kind of got me thinking, he's likely going to go down as the greatest builder of this era. | ||
| And you've been in on a lot of those meetings with him. | ||
| Has to your, to your knowledge, has the subject of rebuilding the Holy Temple in Jerusalem come. | ||
| Interesting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whatever the future may hold, InfoWars will always live wherever. | |
| The fight will continue. | ||
| Be sure to follow us on X at RioAlexJones and at AJN Live. | ||
| And now you can download the number one news app in the world. | ||
| Go to alexjonesapp.com and let the Democrat Deep State Party know that we will never be silenced. | ||
| I started having seizures like a few years ago, and everybody in my family knows I'm a neuroscientist. | ||
| What did you do to fix it? | ||
| Methylene blue. | ||
| I take it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Mel Gibson was on here talking about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This stuff works, man. | |
| I take it every day as well. | ||
| And RFK Jr. told me about it. | ||
| Yeah, man, it's fantastic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is Bobby Kennedy Jr. dropping into that glass of water? | |
| Plenty of folks are wondering what was in that little bottle he uncorked during a flight. | ||
| Methylene blue. | ||
| Shower Kennedy taking it. | ||
| Kennedy literally gobbles it. | ||
| He must be doing something right. | ||
| That ripped bod is 73 years old. | ||
| You shouldn't have to tell a doctor about methylene blue. | ||
| I think everybody should know about it. | ||
| It's changed my life. | ||
| I knew what that did for me. | ||
| I knew that it got me up and walking again, and I was having seizures about it. | ||
| And I was bad, really bad. | ||
| So I ordered it. | ||
| I started taking it. | ||
| And boy, let me tell you something. | ||
| What a blessing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For me, it's like a fog lifted, but it was like a veil lifted off, you know? | |
| Incredible. | ||
| Best product that I've searched so far. | ||
| It clears the brain fog where you're actually able to focus more clearly. | ||
| Let me tell you something. | ||
| I'm walking without a cane. | ||
| I take one pill a day of the ivermectin with the methylene blue. | ||
| And I got to tell you, what a blessing. | ||
| I am so blessed. | ||
| It is a miracle. | ||
| It's been proven for 100 years. | ||
| It's one of the most well-proven drugs out there. | ||
| My kids take it. | ||
| My wife takes it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everybody takes it. | |
| I used to have to pay, what, $10,000 a week to get it in my arms and sit there for six hours a day to get it pumped in my system. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now I can take two pills or drink it once a day and pay what? | |
| I don't know, $30,000, $40 a bottle of it. | ||
| Depends on what the sale is, yeah. | ||
| And it's helping me to have a quality of life that I didn't have before that I have now. | ||
| And I gotta tell you, what a blessing. | ||
| I don't care what anybody says. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know what it's like with it, and I know what it's like without it. |
Export Selection