Friday War Room Full Show: George Soros Caught Funding Violent Anti-Trump “No Kings” Protests Across the Country, As Socialist Poised To Usher In Communist Takeover of New York City
Harrison Smith and guests expose Doran Mamdani’s $13K foreign donations—violating U.S. election law—as part of a broader elite conspiracy to undermine America, while framing "No Kings" protests as violent anti-Trump rallies with 2,500 planned demonstrations nationwide. They contrast Newsom’s "declaration of independence" rhetoric with leftist attacks on ICE agents, including $50K bounties and threats to loot corpses, arguing systemic corruption and controlled narratives prevent real change despite conservative electoral wins. Disney’s Tron and Trump’s DOJ/FBI appointments are highlighted as potential tools against woke authoritarianism, with Smith dismissing liberal backlash as evidence of cultural surrender. [Automatically generated summary]
Frontrunner Azohran Mamdani is facing growing scrutiny over his campaign finances.
According to reports by right-wing media outlets, Mamdani's campaign accepted donations from foreign sources, which would be a direct violation of U.S. election law.
The controversy comes just weeks before Election Day and has raised fresh questions about transparency, accountability, and the flow of money into American politics.
Now, under U.S. election law, candidates are strictly prohibited from accepting campaign funds from non-U.S.
citizens or foreign residents.
Yet new findings suggest that Doran Mamdani's mayoral campaign received nearly $13,000 from foreign donors, including a contribution from his mother-in-law in Dubai.
We're going to fight not through the bullets, but the ballots.
unidentified
Going to the ballot and voting is now an obligatory action for the aim.
And it is a jihad that is now needs to be done because this is our modern jihad.
You can elect a person who wants the Sharia.
Because in the United States, what we do know is that in the past election, just this last election, there have been over 800 Muslim candidates running for office.
We may end up with about 50 members of Congress in the next six years.
That's really the essence of dismantling the system of injustice, is to replace it with the people who represent the Prophet Approximately 71 percent of foreign-born Muslims arrived after 1990, with a significant surge after 2000.
Over the last decade, from 2015 to 2025, U.S. immigration data indicates about 6.6 million total foreign-born arrivals since 2018, with Muslims making up a small but growing share, including roughly 3 million Muslim immigrants arriving between 2020 and 2025 amid global displacement.
Or the United Nations Replacement Migration Plan.
Peel back the veil of multiculturalism and you'll see the blueprint laid bare in the unredacted files of the Muslim Brotherhood's explanatory memorandum, a 1991 roadmap to settle America through immigration infiltration and the slow boil of Sharia supremacy.
unidentified
We do not want to melt into American society and disappear.
We want to go into American society with Islamic ideals and revamp their thinking.
I am holding in my hand the Muslim Brotherhood Plan for North America written in 522, 1991.
This is about their explanation on how they're going to take over the West, their 100-year plan to infiltrate and dominate the West and establish an Islamic government on earth.
This plan was presented as evidence in the Holy Land Foundation trial, the largest terrorism trial ever in the history of the United States, where our government handed down 108 guilty verdict to Muslim Americans and Muslim organizations in America, raising money in the United States and sending it overseas to support terrorist activity overseas.
And it says, the process of settlement is a civilization jihadist process with all the word means.
The ikhwan, which is the Arabic word for brothers, must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from Infowars.com band.video on this Friday, the 17th of October, 2025.
We got a big show for you today.
Lots of big things happening in D.C. and all around the world.
And of course, we'll open up for your phone calls as well.
And we may or may not be joined a little bit later by Wid Lyman.
He's on the ground now at the Broadville, Illinois ICE facility that has been the site of ongoing riots for the last little while now.
We've got a lot of videos from him, and we'll probably talk to him.
But if action breaks out, then, well, he'll be joining us from right in the midst of it.
So that's very exciting, and we're very excited to do that.
But of course, I'm very excited to bring back something else.
Yeah, these are some of the videos captured by Wood earlier today.
It's always sad seeing pretty, it's always sad seeing pretty women tied up in the leftist nonsense.
It could have been such a wonderful mother.
We're doing something here that we haven't done in a while, but it's back.
It's back, folks, by popular demand.
We're bringing it back.
We're shifting it from American Journal to War Room.
Here it is, folks.
your daily dispatch.
Here it is, folks, your daily dispatch.
For Friday, the 17th of October, 2025, Trump says Maduro doesn't want to F around with the United States.
One of many very powerful statements he made earlier today.
President Trump responded to reports of Venezuela President Nicholas Maduro offering preferential access to the nation's natural resources in exchange for lowering the temperature as U.S. conducted a series of Caribbean strikes, telling reporters Maduro doesn't want to F around with the United States.
He didn't censor himself, though.
We've got more information about that.
The CIA has been unleashed on Venezuela, and it seems like Venezuela is doing everything they can to not be utterly destroyed by America.
Maybe too little too late.
Speaking of too little too late from Infowars.com, Mr. Zelensky goes to Washington.
Today, President Trump met with Volodymyr Zelensky after a very good phone call with President Trump.
Apparently, yesterday, he has Ukraine President Zelensky in the White House today, and they actually gave a pretty long press conference a little bit earlier where Zelensky, again, just wants this war to go on forever and ever and ever and ever.
And Trump has come out with a few statements about what is causing the holdup with the peace deal.
And basically, he blames it on bad blood, aka it's Zelensky.
It's basically just Zelensky hating Putin and not wanting to give up his power is the way I interpret that.
But of course, Trump talks about the fact that he got a peace agreement or at least a ceasefire deal and the potential for a peace agreement with 59 countries in the Middle East, but he can't get Russia and Ukraine to talk to each other.
So we'll show you clips from that a little bit later.
Meanwhile, John Bolton surrenders to officials in classified document case.
John Bolton to make first court appearance in classified document case.
He actually made that earlier today.
He pled not guilty to all 18 counts, but it's in going away.
And in fact, everybody I've heard talk about this who's not just desperately trying to frame it as some sort of revenge job from Trump.
But I've got clips from CNN and just experts all across the board, and everybody agrees, no, this is a bombshell case.
This is absolutely a dead to rights case.
John Bolton committed multiple violations of the law in ways that was really egregious and actually put our national security at risk.
We'll get into that a little bit later.
Meanwhile, GOP lawmakers referred Jack Smith to DOJ for misconduct probe and disbarment.
A group of Republican lawmakers led by Senator Marsha Blackburn has formally referred former special counsel Jack Smith to the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility for a Misconduct Investigation and urged his disbarment in two states, citing what they call deeply disturbing revelations that Smith secretly obtained their phone records.
Of course, that was just sort of the very tip of the iceberg of what they really did, what he really did, what he was really involved in.
Again, I think much more severe punishments should be in store for old Jack Smith after all.
He didn't go through the process he was supposed to.
Basically everything he did, he did under the cloud of complete fraud.
So we'll get into that too a little bit later.
But of course, tomorrow is the 18th of October.
No Kings number two from CNN.
No Kings 2, what we know about this Saturday's nationwide day of protest.
As President Donald Trump arrived at his military parade in Washington, D.C. this June to a 21-gun salute and members of the crowd singing happy birthday, about 5 million people across the country took to the streets to protest his administration.
Now, amid an ongoing government shutdown and Trump's push to deploy National Guard troops to American cities, millions are gearing up for round two.
More than 2,500 demonstrations, around 450 more than were planned in June across all 50 states, are slated for Saturday in the second round of the No Kings protest, which aimed to broadly reject what organizers describe as Trump's authoritarian agenda.
So, yes, folks, the No Bigfoot parade going on all across the country tomorrow.
They're going to demand that something that doesn't exist come to an end.
They're absolutely infuriated that Bigfoot and Santa Claus and the Easter bunny are out there being authoritarian.
It doesn't exist.
And again, they're really trying to push this line.
They're really desperately trying to convince everybody that what Trump is doing is authoritarian, which is interesting because if he was authoritarian, you wouldn't be able to make those claims.
You would know if he was being authoritarian.
And I, again, just like always am torn between recognizing and giving credit to Trump for not being authoritarian and giving these people nothing to actually hang their hat on and knowing that they're going to do it anyway.
They think he's authoritarian anyway, and knowing that if he is too soft and, you know, takes half measures with these people, it's going to get really bad.
And of course, they're reminding us over and over.
I've got more videos of J.B. Pritzker, governor of Illinois, again, saying not only would they go after and charge ICE agents for doing their jobs if Democrats ever get back in power, but the same goes for Stephen Miller and anybody in Trump's circle, which again is just literal treason.
So we'll talk about that in just a little bit.
But that's your daily dispatch brought to you, of course, by thealexjonesstore.com, the alexjonesstore.com.
Today is your last day to be registered to win both of the incredible cars that we're offering in our raffle with the relaunch Alex Jones Super Sale fundraiser.
We're putting also, get this, a free bottle of nitric boost in every order as part of the relaunch Alex Jones Super Sale fundraiser.
Today only, go to thealxjonestore.com and use and get a free bottle of nitric boost on absolutely any order.
Plus, we've extended the 25% off store-wide sale in addition to that free nitric boost bottle, which actually is one of the products I really like from the AlexJonesStore.com and take regularly the Nitric Boost is fantastic.
It does vasodilation is what it's called.
It actually increases the diameter of your veins, which allows your blood to flow more freely and can help to, well, it helps your body with a lot of stuff.
I'm not making any medical claims because, well, we're coming to the end of one bankruptcy.
I don't need to get sued again.
So do your own research.
Go check out Nitric Boost and look at some of the reviews and see what it can do for people.
It really is incredible.
The AlexJonesStore.com, the AlexJonesStore.com slash Harrison, if you want to let him know who sent you.
And like I said, we have a lot to talk about today and a lot of breaking news out from the White House and other places.
I guess some of them have to be censored.
I'm not even sure if I can show all of them.
After all, when Trump's talking about Venezuela effing around with people, it's not radio-friendly exactly.
So I guess I won't be able to go to that video, even though I have it.
But I do want to go to some other ones like this one about Trump talking about considering using Tomahawk missiles, sending Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine, because, as we know, that would be a major step towards direct confrontation with Russia.
You know, Trump is very good at keeping up this balancing act of seeming completely insane and doing everything that would seem to piss off Vladimir Putin, while also somehow moving us more towards peace.
It's hard to tell.
It's hard to tell with Trump because it feels like, yeah, literally half of what he says.
I mean, you'll literally say it.
He'll be like, yeah, we're going to go in and destroy Hamas.
I mean, we're not.
We're not going to have to do that, but we will.
But we are going to.
We're definitely going to go in.
We're going to destroy them.
We're going to kick their butts.
But it's not going to be us.
But it'll be under our auspices.
But also, it's not going to happen.
It's like, okay.
It's kind of how his negotiation tactics go.
Yeah, you know, we're going to send Tomahawk missiles to Ukraine if Russia doesn't come to the table.
But, you know, actually, we're not going to.
And Russia did come to the table.
It was Ukraine that didn't.
But we're still going to send the Tomahawk missiles.
It's like, all right, then I don't know what the hell is going on.
And it's no wonder we're not getting any signed agreements when no one can agree on anything ever.
But let's go to this, go to this video of Trump talking about the Tomahawk missiles.
Guys, you know which number that is.
Number three, here's clip number three.
Trump says he'll consider sending these missiles to Ukraine, even though we think it's kind of a bad idea.
We build our own drones, but we also buy drones from others.
And they make a very good drone.
I mean, drone warfare has really come to the fore over the last couple of years because of this war.
I will say, there's nothing like the jets.
You know, we knocked out a lot of drones in Israel.
We were knocking them out for Israel.
And we were doing it with extremely fast and powerful jets, following the drones and knocking the hell out of them.
So, you know, we know a lot about the drones, and we know a lot about the great jets, the great ones.
The ones, well, and the B-52s, which were totally under, they were stealth.
They were undetectable.
So we have a lot of different weapons.
And, you know, I have an obligation also, though, to make sure that we're completely stocked up as a country because you never know what's going to happen in war and peace, right?
And of course, that is the big issue: we've sent so many weapons, so much weaponry to Ukraine and Israel that we don't have a sufficient amount to protect ourselves anymore.
And in fact, we're incapable of building them at the rate that we've been giving them away.
So we're actually backlogged like several years of production.
But Ukraine is demanding more.
But they're offering us their toy drones in exchange.
Trump's like, yeah, yeah, you know, we make our own drones.
We're fine, actually.
Actually, we have jets and B-52s that are undetectable by radar.
But yeah, maybe.
Yeah, maybe we'll take some of your little toy drones there, Ukraine.
Thanks for that.
I mean, you want to talk about bad deals.
The war in Ukraine has been the worst deal of all time.
Bar none.
What have we given?
$100 billion, all of the weapons we need to defend ourselves.
A lot of capital in terms of geopolitical diplomacy spent on this.
Of course, not to mention the probably upwards of a million lives that have been killed.
And what has been gained?
Nothing.
Nothing, actually.
No, Hunter and Joe Biden got away with their crimes.
That's basically what we got in return for that.
It's just utterly and completely ridiculous.
And it just goes on and on and on and on and on.
And a lot of this has to do with the Trump proofing of the Ukraine war that the scumbags at NATO and the EU and the UN put together for this exact moment when Trump is trying to end a war and they have agreements and treaties signed to guarantee weapons deliveries for God knows how much longer.
At a certain point, like, why is Zelensky still coming around?
Who is this guy?
He's not even a duly elected president.
He's term expired a year ago at least.
And he's just, he just comes and just makes demands and then gets humiliated by Trump.
It's just ridiculous.
It's just when you look at the triumvirate of Putin, Trump, and Zelensky, there's an odd one out, isn't there?
There's an odd one out.
There's two guys who, by sheer force of will and their own personality, have come to dominate the political structures of their respected countries, having a complete mandate from a majority of the people there and actually seem like they are genuinely trying to and succeeding in many ways to benefit their country.
And then you have Zelensky.
Then you have Zelensky, the former comic actor who was plucked out of obscurity.
Actually, he pretended to be president on a show for a while, then became president.
and has delivered nothing but endless death and destruction to his people while massively enriching himself and his cohorts.
They're still doing the most insane tyrannical stuff.
You know, he denaturalized and removed citizenship from like the mayor of Kiev because he wasn't going along with him.
He's actually a literal dictator tyrant, unelected authoritarian who is taking men off the streets, ripping guys off the streets to send them to be cannon fodder and die on the front lines, who's been purchasing yachts and houses for his family with all the money that we spend him.
His wife is going on shopping trips in Paris with million-dollar credit limits.
And it's just like, and he's just brought them nothing but chaos and destruction and misery.
And he was put there in order to do that by American forces and the likes of George Soros and other international menaces who have made a career out of overthrowing countries.
And we all have, you know, Victoria Newland and Piat and all these people to blame for this.
It's just another sort of insistence that like, yeah, our politics are not what we think they are.
If they were, then the guy we elected specifically to shut this war down would be able to shut the war down.
Somehow, can't get done.
Trump wants it.
Putin wants it.
Doesn't get done.
Sort of makes a joke of the whole our democracy thing.
I'm not sure if I put the video in, but I did have a video earlier where it's a UK television show and they have a, you know, it's a national show there and they have a poll they put out and they take people are voting online and by text message and the question is, you know, is multiculturalism a good thing?
Is multiculturalism working?
And it came back 95% no, 5% yes.
And it's like, that's, and it doesn't stop, but it doesn't, it's not going to stop and it's never going to stop.
So it doesn't matter how much, how many people, what a sizable majority of a population wants, it ain't going to happen if it's against the designs of the elite, which are to spark World War III in order to enslave us all.
So that's what they're doing.
And Trump's doing everything he can, it seems, to put a stop to that.
But it's got to be infuriating and distracting as we have so much else going on.
And again, I got to give it to the Trump administration.
They are going full bore on corruption in a real way, in a tangible way.
It seems like every day I'm seeing multiple headlines about arrests of politicians or NGO operators.
And it's just, it's another one of these situations where this could have been done at any time.
And it really should make you feel, as an American, like you're being taken advantage of because how much of our money, how much of our tax dollars have been poured into the surveillance system, the law enforcement, the multiple layers of national security apparatus that have access to all the information they could ever want and all the tools they could ever require.
No limit, certainly not the Constitution, you know, forcing them to stop doing any of this stuff.
And yet, and yet somehow there are these multi, multi, multi-million dollar programs that just go unabated.
Just total fraud being carried out right out in the open for years on end at certain points.
I've got like, again, multiple stories just from today.
There's this one.
Popular Democrat homeless activist in Charlotteville, or no, in Charlotte, North Carolina, Cedric Dean has just been raided by the FBI for allegedly running a $14.5 million health card health care fraud scheme by taking advantage of the homeless and submitting false claims to Medicaid.
And that's just one of like just infinite numbers of schemes exactly like that.
We've got RFK Jr. saying that they busted one of these for, again, just many, many millions of dollars.
And we've got another two arrests actually taking place in California as California has spent billions and billions and billions of dollars ostensibly to fix the homeless crisis, which in liberal doublespeak actually means exacerbate and maximize the homeless crisis.
Which again, is there anywhere else in the world, any other aspect of your life where this is the case?
Would you ever hire an exterminator who like came into your house and dropped a box of mice out on the floor and walked away?
Would you keep paying for a gym if every time you went there, you kept getting fatter?
Like, how do we have so many government programs that do literally the exact opposite of what they're intended to do?
And it is on, it's on purpose, by the way.
The reason why this happens is because it's actually on purpose and because the people who are bad people, the people with unfriendly intentions, the schemers, the deceivers, they've realized that it's just incredibly easy to claim you're going to fix a problem, bilk millions and millions of dollars from the U.S. taxpayers, and then nobody does anything about it.
And you'll never go to jail and you'll never get caught.
And even if you do get caught, it's just sort of par for the course.
It's actually the way things just operate.
So who are you to blame?
So you can take in tens of millions of dollars to fight homelessness.
And then at the end of your career, homeless people have multiplied by three.
Every problem you pretended to be solving is significantly worse.
Only you're millions of dollars richer and the taxpayers are dead broke and their actual things that they actually need, the services that would actually benefit them, fall to the wayside.
And it's just, how is it everywhere and all of the time?
How is this such a constant thing that we are always having to report on?
And why is it always the government at the center of it?
Because no other corporation could get away with this.
I mean, do people not understand, like, what do people think about this?
Like, people who are leftists, does it ever break through to them?
Does it ever become clear to them that if you pay a company $10 million to fix homelessness and they just buy a bunch of booze for homeless people and a year later, the homeless crisis is significantly worse, does that ever have any impact on the way that they see the world or the solutions they propose?
It really doesn't.
It really just has absolutely no impact on how they perceive things.
I probably should have grabbed this clip too, but I've already played so many clips, but it was a great segment of Steven Crowder going into that barbershop.
And he had a clip that went viral today, where it's sort of the similar thing.
He was like, do you guys understand that black people commit more crime than white people?
And there's like, nope, we won't accept that.
And he's like, all right, then we cannot come together because you cannot acknowledge reality.
And that's basically, that sums up sort of where we are in this world.
Like, I would love to come together with my fellow Americans.
I'd love to put together some programs that solve things, but they are allergic to reality and they cannot change their mind to comport with what is real.
So yes, we'll keep doing this.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
George Soros caught funding a violent No Kings rally.
I mean, they really want it to get violent.
I have no doubt that it is going to.
I mean, the scenes that we're seeing out of the Broadville, Illinois ICE facility, every single day, it looks like we're on the cusp of, you know, the outbreak of some real violence.
And so I expect, you know, those places to be epicenters of the No Kings riot.
And, you know, hopefully the Trump administration has put the word out to everybody.
Just let them wave their signs.
Just let them walk around and scream.
You're not even going to notice.
I mean, does anybody even remember the No Kings protest last time?
You know, I guess they walked around a little bit.
It really doesn't matter.
It really isn't like a thing that actually matters.
So they want it to matter.
They want us to be like calling it like, oh, you know, we have to go crush it and shut it down.
It's like, who cares?
Who cares?
Let them walk around.
I do think it's worth pointing out that they expect it to be significantly larger than last time, which is troubling because that means that things are not going in the right direction.
And I'll talk a little bit more about that in just a little bit because it seems like people on the right have this idea that we've won somehow, that by electing President Trump and the Congress and the Senate, that we are therefore in charge and in power now.
And that's, you know, we're winning.
And it's like, that's, we're really not winning in ways that really matter substantially.
So I'll explain that in just a little bit.
We do have another video out of this Trump-Zelinsky meeting.
And this one's pretty interesting because, again, it's from our old friend Kirill Dmitriev, who, of course, is the CEO of the Sovereign Wealth Fund of Russia.
He's a special envoy, very good friends with Putin and Trump.
And he's the one that's been cue posting and is constantly sort of winking at the Q people, posting storm emojis under certain developments.
And he is the one that suggested that we reinvigorate, reignite the JFK, was it Gorbachev or whoever was the premier of the USSR at that point?
They planned on creating a bridge or a tunnel between America and Russia.
And Kirill Dmitriev is reigniting this idea.
And Trump actually responded to it today.
So let's go to that video.
Here's President Trump responding to the idea of the Putin-Trump peace tunnel between America and Russia.
This gremlin, this just little, this little pathetic gremlin.
Why?
Why do we, why is he a person that I have to know about?
Exactly.
Of course, he doesn't like it.
It's called the peace tunnel, and his entire life is dependent on endless war.
So, yeah, it's like death to him.
Peace, the prospect, the outbreak of peace.
Again, it's just like we should be placing debts, bets.
Which is going to happen first?
Are we going to be able to end a war that nobody involved actually wants to be in?
Or are we going to be able to deport Maryland manned Kilmara Brego Garcia?
Two things that should just be infinitely easy to do.
Should be the matter of stroke of the pen in either regard, but that's assuming that politics is what it is perceived as a group of people representing Americans.
But no, that's not what it is.
It is, in fact, a cabal of psychopaths, mostly in banks, driving us all towards obliteration.
So it's going to keep happening, apparently.
We just, we can't, we just can't get what we want.
We can't do what we want because we're not in charge in any, you know, real substantial way.
And again, we'll get back to that.
But I do want to get to John Bolton.
But I want to remind you to go now to thealexjonesstore.com.
And I don't know if we have the video that Chase filmed of them showing off the car.
Yeah, let's show this.
This is one of the two cars you can win.
And if you go today, you get additional 50 times entries to win both this car, the Red C8 Corvette and the Jeep 392 plus $20,000 in cash.
Today's your last day to be entered for both of those with the 50 times bonus.
And you get a free bottle of Nitric Boost with every single order.
Every single order gets a free bottle of Nitric Boost and 50 time entries to win this car.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Hell yeah.
All right.
Today is your last chance to win the Corvette on the AlexJonesStore.com.
50X entries.
We got a JSixer in there right now, peeling out 56 entries right now on the AlexJonesStore.com at your last chance.
Incredible machine.
Look at this.
Oh, God.
Go to the AlexJonesStore.com right now.
Get a free bottle of Nitric Boost with every order and win this Corvette.
Your last chance is today.
Get it right now.
Be the reason Alex Jones will always be on the air.
Imagine this time a month from now, you could be screaming down the highway in your new Corvette with your Alex Jones t-shirt on, your InfoWars hat, your blood pumping with the power of Nitric Boost.
I won't say where you're driving, but wherever you want, the world is yours.
That could be you, folks.
Just go today to the AlexJonesore.com, the AlexJonesore.com slash Harrison, if you want to let him know who sent you.
And don't wait.
Today's the last day to win that car and the incredibly powerful Jeep.
And you get 50 times entries today, as well as that free bottle of nitric boost on any order.
The AlexJonesStore.com.
Let's talk about Bolton.
Let's talk about old Bolton.
Bolton was arraigned today.
He was filmed walking in to surrender at a district court in Greenbelt, Maryland.
He pled not guilty to all 18 counts that he's being charged under.
And it's very damning stuff.
It's so damning even CNN is being forced to admit that this doesn't look like retribution.
This looks like a genuine application of the law.
Let's go now to clip number 17.
Here's a legal expert, a former White House lawyer, talking about what's really behind these John Bolton indictments.
Clip 17.
unidentified
You say that Bolton's indictment is like Comey's and James's because it's about revenge, but then you say that's where the similarities end.
That's exactly my view, which is, yes, this case would not have been brought but for Trump's revenge because we know the Biden Justice Department declined to bring this case, quite likely to avoid burning the means and methods through which they extracted the Iranian intelligence, which is a valid governmental concern.
What we have now is, you know, Bolton insisting that this is, you know, purely revenge.
That's clearly not the case if you read the indictment.
Keep in mind that in the Comey case, seasoned senior prosecutors who were later forced to resign told the Justice Department that there was insufficient evidence to pursue the case.
In the James case, senior prosecutors in the Eastern District advised that they didn't even go to insufficient evidence.
They said there's no case.
That's clearly not what we have here when you look at this indictment.
And keep in mind, Judge Lambert five years ago in the dispute over the book pointed out that Bolton's unilateral conduct had raised serious national security concerns, that he had gambled with national security.
He'd probably harmed his country, and he'd certainly exposed himself to potential criminal liability.
So this shouldn't come as a news flash that there's a potential crime here.
Two federal judges, magistrate judges, issued search warrants where the probable cause standard that was used by the grand jury today was met, and they issued search warrants.
And the materials that were taken are consequential and highly consequential because the most important paragraph in the indictment to me is the paragraph that makes plain not a single one of the documents used in the book or in the pre-review process is a basis for any of the charges.
All these charges are based on newly found evidence.
So I think that echoes the seriousness of this and it certainly undermines the political arguments that Bolton would like to make.
It looks like it's about revenge, but actually this is really bad.
Actually, he definitely committed crimes that were actually very dangerous.
Now, apparently, he was emailing himself notes with classified information about it.
And the rumor I've heard is that Iran actually hacked this email account because it was an AOL email account.
And we're actually able to get information from this, which is, of course, ironic because John Bolton has called for people like Chelsea Manning to be executed under a charge of treason for daring to allow classified information to get in the hands of our enemies.
And he's learning to eat those words.
Of course, those aren't the only ones, he said.
And this is why it's less important that we focus on the distinction between Republicans and Democrats as we do between the deep state and the rest of us.
John Bolton could have been charged under the Biden administration, but they didn't charge him.
They protected him.
Why?
Not because he's Republican, because he's one of them.
Because he's one of them.
That really is the important distinction here.
And he's going to learn to regret a lot of what he said.
The brazenness with which he projected his own crimes onto people like Donald Trump is really something to behold.
And it's been brought up quite a bit since his indictment.
Let's go now to clip number 16.
This is all the way back in June of 2023.
John Bolton, very concerned about the way Donald Trump handled classified information.
From Viva Fry at the Viva Fry on Acts, the Bolton indictment is so damning, it defies words.
It details brazen corruption, abject stupidity, and most importantly, conduct of people who sincerely believe they are above the law.
He said, I presume individual one and individual two, who are the recipients of the diary-like entries detailing all the classified information Bolton was receiving are his wife and daughter.
I initially actually, I initially thought actual book editors, but the indictment refers to them as related.
So he's sharing classified information.
He's sending it through undauthorized emails.
He did not report having sent classified emails from email that was hacked.
It's a comedic level of stupidity, avarice, greed, brazen corruption, and a sense of legal and political invincibility to boot.
Holy crap, he needs to go to jail.
And he has selections of the indictment here highlighted, say things like this.
From on or about April 9th, 2018, through on or about September 15th, 2019, on a regular basis, Bolton sent diary-like entries to individuals one and two that contained information classified up to the top secret/slash CSI level, SCI level.
Bolton made many of these diary-like entries by transcribing his handwritten notes from his day's activities into word processing documents, which he then electronically sent to individual one and two through a commercial non-governmental messaging application.
Well, that's a dumb thing to do, Bolton.
At some point, between when Bolton left government service in September 2019 and July 2021, a cyber actor believed to be associated with the Islamic Republic of Iran hacked Bolton's personal email account and gained unauthorized access to the classified and national defense information in that account, which Bolton had previously emailed to individuals one and two while he was national security advisor.
A representative for Bolton notified the U.S. government of the hack in or about July 2021, but did not tell the U.S. government account contained national defense information, including classified information that Bolton had placed in his account from the time, from his time as national security advisor.
Then he goes on to say this.
In at least one communication, Bolton also referred to individuals one and two as his editors.
So claiming that they were his editors, but as Viva Fry points out, it seems more likely that they are related to John Bolton.
On or about July 15th, 2018, individual two sent Bolton and Individual One a message stated, Do we get a diary today?
Individual one responded, don't think he can do it on this trip.
Bolton later added, too much going on.
I've done much of Friday in London because I didn't take many notes and wanted to get it down before I forgot.
I'd love to see, I'd love to see the context or the content of some of these documents.
So I wonder just how free and open he was with his editors, aka probably his wife and daughter.
But he's just one of many, many deep staters being held to account for their innumerable crimes, as we said.
Jack Smith is now being referred for disbarment, as well as a misconduct probe, which I would hope would end in some form of criminal charge, which again, I think, just can come simply from the fact that he never actually went through the process he was supposed to go through to do the things that he did actually do.
So in the same way that I can't put on a police officer uniform and go arrest people or charge people fines, you can't just declare yourself a U.S. attorney and go start subpoenaing records for people.
There's actually a process you have to go through.
The whole intention of that process being to prevent it being political, to prevent people from persecuting their political enemies.
So they circumvented that.
He was never approved by the Senate.
He was just anointed by Merritt Garland, who gave him free reign to go after Trump about whenever or whatever he wanted.
Call to Georgia, 2020 election fraud, January 6th, like whatever.
Just go get him on something, anything.
And you have inordinate power to do so.
Totally fraudulent, all fraudulent from the top to bottom.
You don't have to prove anything.
Just on the face of it, he was not allowed to do the things he did.
Disbarment should be the first step of a mini-step process, eventually ending in his incarceration.
Like, when are we going to get serious about some of this stuff?
And when are we going to start feeling the effects of all of the corruption that's being wrapped up right now?
As I said just a few minutes ago, we've got this story about a popular Democrat activist in Charlotte, North Carolina, being caught for $14.5 million in fraud.
You also have this, the DOJ has finally brought charges against Antifa and supercharged them with terrorism enhancements.
First on Fox, DOJ brings first Antifa-related terrorism charges in the Texas ICE attack.
And again, we can go through the actual, like what actually happened that day is just, again, insane.
I just like keep talking about it.
Like nobody seems to recognize how crazy this is.
Let me read this.
The attack.
Late at night on the 4th of July, 2025, a North Texas Antifa cell of at least 11 operatives clad in black and donning masks, some of whom were wearing body armor and carrying firearms, attacked the Prairie Land Detention Center in Alvaredo, Texas.
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security was using Prairieland to house illegal aliens awaiting deportation.
Members of the Antifa cell began shooting fireworks towards the facility and vandalizing vehicles in a guard shed.
Alarmed at the presence of people near the facility late at night, DHS correctional officers inside the facility went outside to investigate.
Other DHS personnel called the local police for assistance.
Within minutes, an officer from the Alvaredo Police Department arrived on scene, stepped out of his cruiser and began issuing commands to a black-clad figure running towards another black-clad figure holding a rifle.
One Antifa member, co-conspirator one, yelled, get to the rifles.
Seconds later, conspirator one opened fire on the officers, striking the Alvaredo police officer in the neck area as the unarmed correctional officers ducked and ran for cover.
The wounded officer fell to the ground, but was able to return a few shots.
Co-conspirator one continued to fire additional rounds until his rifle jammed.
The attackers then left the scene.
Police arrested most of the Antifa cells shortly after the attack, many near the scene of the attack, including Zachary Ebbets.
Police arrested Cameron Arnold the following day.
I mean, how is this not a bigger deal?
How is this not, how was this not the top story for weeks on end?
There has been more coverage of a non-existent bribe to Tom Homan than there is this multi-stage ambush of Antifa against an ICE facility in Texas.
There's been more coverage of the couple of Republicans having a spicy group chat than there ever was of the fact that there was a 10-person strong cell of domestic terrorists firing fireworks to lure out officers to then fire on them from pre-staged firing positions.
Get to the rifles, right?
Stage two is happening.
Let's keep following the plan that we've laid out.
And this is like not even, it's not even a top story.
It's like nobody even cares.
Am I going crazy?
How is this not a much, much bigger story?
And if it was a bigger story, would people not maybe understand why ICE, a little bit paranoid, wants to have fences around their outlets, wants to have protection from local police?
They're acting like ICE are being Gestapo.
They're the Nazis stomping around arresting citizens.
Doesn't happen.
Every case of people being arrested, and you can find articles where it's like, ICE arrest an American citizen.
This is horrible.
And the story is that like they'll arrest somebody, they hold him for two hours.
They confirm his identity.
They let him go.
Sorry.
Sorry about that.
You are the one American citizen amongst 50 illegal immigrants who are all telling us, no, no, I'm a citizen.
I'm a citizen.
None of them are citizens.
So they don't believe you either.
It's like, obviously, they're not just going to take your word for it and let you go.
You got to actually prove it.
But that's the worst thing that's happened.
So far, the worst thing that's happened as a consequence of ICE is that some American American citizens have been detained briefly and then let go.
On the other hand, the things that have been done to ICE are multiple instances of snipers attacking them and shooting police officers, in this case, in a coordinated mob attack with rifles, fireworks, explosives, and a multi-step operation plan.
Crazy.
So at least two of them have now been charged as terrorists, as they should be.
But the fact that's not a much, much bigger story and doesn't continue to be a significant story shows you just the bias of them, the absolute insane bias of the media, who will spend weeks on end, you know, arguing about stuff that doesn't exist, like Tom Homan taking a $50,000 bribe and ignore literal violent militia terrorist attacks against ICE officers.
And that was just, that was like an early one.
There have been two or three ever since then.
But on the topic of things that the mainstream media ignores/slash makes up, let's go to clip eight here.
This is Bill O'Reilly asking Tom Homan about the accusation that he took $50,000 that nobody has substantiated and yet became a major talking point.
I don't think we ever showed the clip, but J.D. Vance had a great comeback where George Stephanopoulos, Slobonopoulos, what was his name, was asking him about Tom Homan and this $50,000 bribe.
And he asked him for like five minutes.
And J.D. Vance is like, we're getting peace in the Middle East.
We're talking to Ukraine.
You have an interview with the vice president and you've spent the whole time talking about a story that doesn't exist.
But that's what they do.
They create narratives from nothing and they ignore real things happening.
Here's Tom Homan reacting to this accusation and pointing out how just utterly ridiculous the whole idea even is.
Of course, they're trying to break out because, you know, they recognize that Trump, he's making himself a king.
They're not going to allow that.
So we know they have very sincere and deeply held beliefs that have to do with liberty and justice, right?
These are things the left absolutely loves.
Here's a here's a little, here's a little, here's a little, another little skit about the No Kings protest.
Clip 22, let's watch.
unidentified
No kings.
Unless it was during the pandemic when all the mom-and-pop businesses were shut down, but the government said it was totally fine for all the major super-rich corporations to continue operating.
But I didn't really care because as long as I could get my starbies and go to Target, I was fine.
No kings.
Except during the pandemic when we told people that they would lose their job unless they took a certain medical product or they couldn't even go into certain restaurants without vaccine paperwork.
That was crazy, but I didn't really care because I just complied.
No kings.
Remember when we also told people that they had to not visit their loved ones that were sick and dying in the hospital, the elderly, they had to die alone.
That was really sad.
We shut down the schools completely wrecked the developmental learning for a whole generation.
I mean, that was tragic, but we don't really talk about that because that's over now.
New outrage.
No kings.
Remember when we were told over and over if we got that medical product, we for sure would not get sick.
And even though the people that got it immediately did get sick, we were for sure told they wouldn't spread it.
And then that gradually became, well, like 95%, like 75%.
Okay, there's no evidence it does what we told everyone it does, but we've already made everyone take it that would anyway.
And no one really cared because it's new outrage time.
No kings.
And do you remember during that time, anyone who tried to bring attention to these issues on social media was censored or their account was banned.
And limiting free speech at that time seemed okay to me.
I didn't really think about it.
No kings.
You don't hate authoritarianism.
You just hate what you're told to hate by the algorithm and the news outlets.
Be so for real.
I just wish the anti-authoritarian energy was present during actual tyranny from both the federal and local governments during that time.
But no, of course not.
And it's not authoritarianism.
If the majority of the people voted for it, both popular vote and electoral votes, people wanted the border secure.
We'll get into the no kings protests on the other side.
And yeah.
Welcome back, folks.
This is Warroom.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
We're going to talk about the No Kings rally.
Now.
And, you know, I just, I don't even know.
It's like they have to couch all of their crap in our language.
They have to.
Because if they were to tell you what they actually believe, nobody would go for it.
So they have to pretend like what they're doing is just classic Americana.
It's about liberty.
They're invoking the Declaration of Independence.
Does it not drive everyone crazy?
Does this just not make everyone as mad as it makes me that the people literally tearing down Thomas Jefferson statues turn around and try to quote him to justify their actions?
Nobody sees this.
This is what I don't get.
I can understand if you just have a difference of opinion, if your values are different than mine and we don't quite align on things.
You've got so many people out there that simultaneously hold in their heads the idea that We have to have a no-kings rally, and that this is a second declaration of independence, but also the very people that wrote the declaration of independence and the bill of rights who established the world that these people uphold as the,
you know, the greatest example of, you know, the powered by the people and I mean, everything they love and say they believe, the human rights, the restrictions of the government, like they're invoking all this stuff while simultaneously they want to destroy everything that was actually built by those people.
Like, does this not do these two ideas not collide in their brains?
Where they're like, and, and, you know, part of it is just like anger at their dishonesty, is just being infuriated at the blatant hypocrisy that is just constantly on display.
But it's so it's like, it's like first you hear it, and it just sort of makes you confused.
You're like, why are they quoting Thomas Jefferson?
This doesn't make any sense.
Then you kind of get mad.
You're like, all right, these bastards are using our beliefs, using the American system to try to justify their communist revolution.
That's infuriating.
Not exactly new, but very infuriating.
You know, the leader of the Viet Cong in Vietnam, the communist that overthrew that country, quoted Thomas Jefferson in his inaugural speech: you can take a lot of Thomas Jefferson out of context, talk about the rights of man and all this stuff, but it's a lie.
It's an absolute lie.
But then it gets to me to this, like, I don't know, I don't know what to call it.
Sort of just like hopelessness, black-pilled.
Just, you just go, these people don't even realize.
They don't even know what they're doing.
Like, and that to me is the thing that it's like impossible to overcome.
Is how do you have these people who you can't talk to?
You can't get through to them.
Their motivations are good in a way.
And it's what they always do, I guess.
You know, now I'm thinking about it: Black Lives Matter, no kings.
Like they always choose a phrase anti-fascist.
Like they choose a phrase that sounds good to get people on their side, but it pretty much has nothing to do with what they're actually talking about.
Just like how Black Lives Matter led to a massive increase in black people being murdered by other black people because they defunded the police and crime, the crime rates skyrocketed, or how the anti-fascist movement is actually just part and parcel with fascism.
It's just, it's the brown shirts, the black shirts going around saying that you deserve to be physically attacked if you don't conform to their ideas.
It's authoritarianism in its most lowest form.
So I guess I should be used to it by now, but I still look at these people and just, it's like you're so close.
You're so close to understanding what's actually going on here.
But there's something fundamentally offset from your initiation.
And I don't know exactly how to deal with that other than just defeat them utterly and not listen to them anymore because nothing they say means anything.
They are as fraudulent as you can possibly be.
And I don't see how more people don't realize this.
Like, we'll go to a video here.
This is AOC, clip 21.
And at first, she's talking about how the Trump administration is saying the No Kings rally is anti-American, you know, probably because it's sponsored by a bunch of A foreigners, B, communist groups.
See, they keep talking about how much they hate America.
And she's very offended by this.
But of course, she wasn't offended when she was calling Trump supporters un-American.
I mean, you don't even need really the second clip.
We're just talking about the Trump administration.
In that first clip, she just immediately contradicts herself.
To call somebody un-American, that's un-American.
Well, wait, but you just called.
Do you understand?
Like, you have to have a level of stupidity.
It's truly astonishing to even try to make sense of what she's saying.
And again, it's constant.
And they have this way of just implanting ideas in people's heads, and it just sticks there.
And it just doesn't matter what the truth is.
The Tom Homan thing is a great example.
Just somebody came up with that at some point.
Somebody said it.
Somebody else reported it.
Haven't seen any proof of it.
He denies it.
But they're going to say it.
They're going to say it from now until forever.
Anytime Tom Homan gets brought up, they'll say, well, he was caught taking a $50,000 bribe.
It just doesn't mean anything.
And it's not just them.
Like, again, the AOCs, I can say, okay, she just isn't that smart.
And, you know, her job as a Democrat is to try to frame everything as if they're standing up for America.
And they don't act, I mean, they don't actually believe in the Constitution.
You get that, right?
Do I need to tell you this?
They're in favor of like maybe four out of the five or, you know, four out of the 10 things enumerated in the Bill of Rights.
They don't actually believe anything.
And what they do believe is just nonsensical.
I was watching a video today, and, you know, people just drop this stuff like it's true, where they say, you know, well, the Republicans, they pretend to like free speech, but they're banning books from schools for not being ideologically in line with them.
Just never happened.
It just never happened.
That's just not a thing that's occurring.
What is occurring is that pornographic material was seeded into elementary schools by a variety of NGOs deliberately to try to get your kid to be trans as part of a big movement that thankfully now is starting to reverse because Trump stepped in and stopped the propaganda supporting it.
And that type of thing, I mean, there's like a million examples of that exact thing where they just genuinely don't know anything that's going on.
And the things that you can just, like if you were to just describe what's going on to a space alien, to somebody from 100 years in the past, it's so baffling what they've decided to hang their hat on.
And it's the reason why Caroline Levitt made this statement.
We'll go to the video.
And this got everybody mad.
Oh my God, they're all so pissed off at this.
This is basically what AOC was just responding to.
It's clip number six here.
And this is Caroline Levitt making just a very obvious and simple point that makes them mad because it's just on the face of it true.
And that maybe it's just the fact that it's true makes them so angry, but they want to take this out of context and portray it like Caroline Levitt is insulting Americans when it's very clear what she's saying.
And all you have to do is listen to it yourself and not be a psychotic brainwashed leftist.
And it's impossible to disagree with.
Here's Caroline Levitt telling everybody who the Democrats see as their constituents.
Proved that the Democrat Party's main constituency are made up of Hamas terrorists, illegal aliens, and violent criminals.
That is who the Democrat Party is catering to, not the Trump administration and not the White House and not the Republican Party who is standing up for law-abiding Americans, not just across the country, but around the world.
Of course, a large part of their constituency is also pedophiles and trannies and the indigent.
You know, she left them out, but it's not the American people.
And it's certainly not American people who actually do what they're supposed to and benefit society as a whole.
Democrats do everything they possibly can to disadvantage and screw those people over.
Is this not obvious?
Do people not know this?
Again, I just, I don't even understand.
Like, they don't even have to try.
People just, it's just in their mind that Democrats are the good guys, Republicans are the bad guys.
It's like no amount of evidence will ever be enough to show what's really going on.
It's just, it's honestly beyond infuriating.
And we can, we can look at, you know, who these other people are, that the what other Democrats are encouraging people to do.
Let's go to clip 15 here.
This is Gavin Newsom, I believe, who again is still setting himself up to be some sort of, I don't, you know, leader of the Confederacy, leader of the Western Alliance with Trump, saying that this no kings protest is a declaration of independence.
No kings, a declaration of independence against the tyranny against lawlessness in the context that there was no rule of law.
It was the rule of the king.
And I think increasingly people are waking up to the rule of law in this country increasingly appearing to be the rule of Don.
And I hope it's dawning on people how precious this moment is and what's at stake.
And so I hope people put a stake in the ground, take the opportunity and time to participate this weekend, but again, do so peacefully with a deep realization of the consequences on what the founding fathers were all about.
It's just never, you know, there's no, there's no line they won't cross.
There's nothing they won't say.
They just believe absolute nothing, believe absolutely nothing, and just say whatever the hell they think they need to to get people on their side.
Founding fathers, you know, can invoke a patriotic feeling.
Great, say that.
But in the meantime, you're tearing down their statues and calling them racist and trying to erase their, you know, portraits from the courtroom because they're old white men and you hate white people.
I mean, it's just, it's just exhausting.
And again, going back to what I was saying, like transgenderism, illegal immigration, I mean, this stuff is genuinely insane.
They say, you know, all every example they could possibly point to of what makes Donald Trump a tyrant, what makes him authoritarian, is just literally the law.
It's just the law.
We have decency laws.
You're not allowed to expose children to indecent material.
So you can't have it in their elementary school.
It has to be taken out.
Oh my God, they're burning books.
They're tyrants.
It's illegal to come into this country and avoid deportation and overstay your visa.
And so you get deported.
Oh, my God.
ICE is tearing people out of their homes.
It's just every single thing they point to is just a literal and specific application of laws that have been on the books since the beginning of this country because it actually forms the basis of government itself.
The whole reason government exists is to protect those inside a country from those outside of the country.
And they're going to invoke the founding fathers.
If George Washington was around, he would be at the front of the army being led to kill all of you.
I'm not even kidding.
Look up the whiskey rebellion.
Our president actually marched on people who were acting just like the left is acting right now.
It is beyond absurd.
And I don't even know what to know what to make of it anymore.
Let's go to clip 14 here.
Here's Don Lemon.
And this is just, it's like, even if I was on their side.
And this is the point.
This is why I think I'm like having trouble getting to any of this is because I try to put myself in their mindset.
I try to imagine what would it be like if I believed this stuff or thought like these people.
And you realize you have to be stupid.
You genuinely have to not be very intelligent or not be able to think for yourself to believe any of this crap.
Because in a lot of things, we seem like we do believe similar things.
Whenever it's convenient for them, they'll pretend to believe what we believe.
Like, I'm sitting here and I'm thinking, all right, if I actually thought for some reason illegal immigrants deserve to stay in this country because they happen to arrive here, I can't even, I can't even, it's hard to even justify that, but okay, let's pretend I believe that, you know, borders are just lines in the ground, the sand, man.
Like, they don't really mean anything.
Would I tell illegal immigrants to arm themselves and to shoot at ICE officers?
If my goal was to get illegal immigrants killed by ICE officers, I might say that.
If my goal was to make ISO, to give ICE officers every excuse they need to militarize their raids, that's the type of advice I would give.
But this is the ultimate frustration: it's like even putting myself in your mindset.
Even if I believed everything you believe, everything you're saying is retarded and wrong.
So what is going on?
Why is everyone so stupid?
Let's go to Don Lemon here telling foreigners in our country to arm themselves and to fire at our law enforcement officers.
Black people, brown people of all stripes, whether you're an Indian American or a Mexican American or whoever you are, go out in your place where you live and get a gun legally.
Get a license to carry legally.
Because when you have people knocking on your door and taking you away without due process as a citizen, isn't that what the Second Amendment was written for?
Go back and read what the Second Amendment says.
And perhaps it will knock some sense in the head, in the heads of these people who are saying, well, it's all great.
I don't believe they're doing it without due process.
No, this is not what the Second Amendment is about.
If the Second Amendment were to be used as intended, as written in the Bill of Rights, then Donald Trump would have invoked the Insurrection Act.
The militia, as detailed in the Second Amendment, aka American citizens would have armed themselves and just be out there killing illegal immigrants.
That's actually what it's for.
The Second Amendment is so the American people can defend themselves from foreigners, from criminals, and from their own government being tyrannical.
It's not there to defend them from the government applying the law as written.
You absolute moron.
It's not there so foreigners can come into our country and kill our law enforcement, you absolute psychopath.
Like, what is wrong with these people?
And again, there's just something that just grinds my gears when you've got people like Don Lemon pretending to approve of the Second Amendment or the First Amendment for that matter.
The people that tell you hate speech isn't free speech are suddenly all about the First Amendment.
The people who just want every authoritarian measure in the book to throw Trump supporters into camps, they suddenly are terrified of authoritarianism and they don't want kings like they aren't already being ruled by a cabal of semi-noble like frauds like George Soros passing his kingdom down to his son.
I mean, at a certain point, like why, like, how is that not a call to violence?
This is not up for discussion.
This is not a debate.
Illegal immigrants are illegal.
That is just the law.
No law has ever been written to open our borders.
No law has ever been written to say that just because you downloaded an app from Alejandro Majorkis, now we can't arrest you and send you back to the country you came from.
Again, it's just what do what do these people think is going on?
What do they think is happening?
It's the same, like there's a video that's going viral yesterday of a guy going, billionaires are trying to convince people to hate migrants.
How could you possibly be so wrong?
How can you possibly believe something like that?
Yeah, I don't know.
I don't know.
This is like a very widespread thing.
They think the billionaires who are the sole reason we have immigrants because it boosts their profits and allowed them to pay slave labor wages, slave wages for their labor.
People who run the Tide Foundation, which is the biggest conglomerate of multinationals the world has ever seen, and spend millions of dollars paying the legal bills of migrants just so they can pay them pennies on the dollar to work in the fields.
Who do you think you're helping here?
How did you ever get it in your mind that billionaires hate migrants?
How can you be that retarded?
I just, I don't understand it.
And really, like all of this comes from that video we saw from Wid Lyman of the woman dressed like the Statue of Liberty.
They're dressing themselves up in American iconography as they demand the death of America.
And it's just like, what do we need to do?
How do we make people realize what's really going on?
And how do we encourage our side to even to have just like 3% of the fervor that the left has?
They are fervent.
They are radical.
They're out there like getting arrested and getting maced in the face off of complete and utter fabrications and lies.
Welcome back, folks.
This is Warroom.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Very happy to welcome my guest, Wid Lyman.
He is there on the ground at the Broadview Detention Center or the ICE facility that has been the site of ongoing riots for the last little while.
It's sort of our weekly check-in, WID.
You can follow Wid on X at WID underscore Lyman and see all of the videos that he's captured with Borderhawk News at Infowars.com.
The headline, Violent Agitators Arrested Outside Chicago ICE Facility.
We can play some of these videos and get your comments on them.
But Wid, what is the atmosphere there in Illinois?
Yeah, so that was a pretty long little standoff for probably about five minutes.
The state police is pushing pretty hard to have people not be in the roadway as cars go to and from.
So that area right there, what you're seeing is sort of the end of that little bit of conflict.
People were getting into the road, partially in the road, and then state police had kind of had enough of what was happening there.
So they arrested two people at that moment.
I believe there are a total of about 12 arrests today, possibly a few more.
But that was a long standoff.
You know, what we're seeing a lot here is protesters have a sort of designated area.
That's the concrete barriers that you're seeing.
And they're not allowed to be in the roadway per police.
So anytime there's people in the roadway, you're going to have conflict.
Again, that was towards the end of the protests there.
But what you're seeing now is during the main conflict this morning when a group of about 50 were standing in the roadway and police were instructing them to leave and they took offense to that.
Local cops, Broadview, are kind of on some of the other roads.
And then we have Cook County, the sheriff's office here as well.
But the feds really aren't getting involved in crowd control in front of the building here.
Like we saw earlier a couple of weeks ago, they were the only ones dealing with the crowd that was in front of the detention facility.
But now it's mostly just the state.
And, you know, it kind of has a twofold effect.
One is they have a ton of training and resources and tactics to deal with large crowds.
As you're seeing, they have the riot batons, they have gear, they have medical, they're filming the whole thing versus the feds are a slightly different angle.
Not to mention the second part is that the protesters don't really want to battle the state police or the local cops.
They want to protest the federal involvement.
So anytime the feds leave this area or head into the city, you're going to see more of a skirmish issue because the local cops just can't follow them around the whole time.
But what you're seeing out front is a pretty coordinated effort by the state.
Well, you know, unfortunately, the government shut down.
So the weather control systems are offline.
We're just going to have to go with whatever nature gives you there.
So have you been able to talk to protesters or the police?
I mean, we've seen a lot of videos of the scuffles and stuff.
And obviously that's very interesting footage, but you don't learn very much from it in terms of like what's driving people to do this and how they feel about what's going on.
Have you had a chance to talk to people and get their reason why they're there and what's motivating them?
They kind of give you boilerplate statements, just want to keep people safe, want to protect the roadway, make sure nobody gets hurt.
The state police does a pretty good job of crowd control and communicating with who they appear to be leaders in the crowd.
The crowd, though, is very much here because they don't like the federal government.
They don't like ICE.
This is largely an anti-ICE protest.
If you're okay, I'll pan and you can kind of see what's going on on the side here, just give you a good little view of what some of these people feel.
Again, if there's profanity, I'll try to shield it.
But yeah, they're anti-ICE is the big push right here.
So the costumes are out in full effect like we've seen there in Portland and they're here to demonstrate, have a party, play music and complain about what ICE is doing in their neighborhood here.
You know, the verbiage here, I think, is important, though, Harrison.
They're using terms like kidnapping, ICE out of our city, federal takeover.
When Commander Bovino was talking about how Chicago has some third world elements to it, they take offense to that.
It's basically just anything to do with the federal government, kidnapping our neighbors, taking our friends off the streets.
This whole day, I'm just kind of struggling to like, how do you even, how do you, is there any hope of convincing these people?
Like, do they not understand that they're illegal immigrants that are being deported?
Like, who do they think they're standing up for?
They think borders just shouldn't exist.
Like, it's just bizarre to me that you've got all these people using language like that.
Like, we're anti-federal government.
These people aren't anti-federal government, right?
I mean, they're all in favor of the federal government doing things that they like.
They just don't want illegal immigrants deported.
It's like, how are we supposed to deal with these people?
Like, this is the law.
It's being enforced in a proper way.
I worry that they're just crying wolf.
And if and when the government does something tyrannical, they're going to be nowhere to be found.
I'm just struggling with how to deal with this with our fellow Americans being so off the mark and protesting for something that's so asinine and insane.
And I love that question, Harrison, because you are seeing people try to have some kind of debate about this issue.
But to me, it's all about framing in perspective.
If you truly believe that masked Nazis are coming into your neighborhood and kidnapping your neighbors, there's really nothing, there's nowhere to go with that, right?
You're talking about worst case scenario, you know, dating back to World War II era stuff.
So I don't think that you can necessarily reason with that.
You could just sort of help with terms.
You know, why are these people masked?
Why are they coming into your neighborhood?
Who is your neighbor?
And then go from there.
And if a lot of people, I think, are totally fine with people being here illegally.
I mean, there were tons of protesters this morning talking about no borders, no walls, no human is illegal.
You know, we're here all on stolen land anyway.
So at that point, you just have to talk about terms and then hopefully you can find some level of common ground.
But again, if your perspective is that rooted in masked Nazis are kidnapping my neighbors, you know, where do you go from there?
It's like trying to, you know, tell a schizophrenic they're not being gangstalked.
It's like, well, they really believe it, even though it's not real and it's not true and it's not happening.
You know, it's, it's like trying to convince people that they're not being hunted by Bigfoot.
It's like, okay, I guess they're just, they're just delusional.
It just, there's something about the fact that they call it the no kings, you know, day and they're invoking the founding fathers, you know, as if they're, you know, carrying on an American tradition.
And it's just like, this is just, it's just asinine and ridiculous.
And actually, I have a, I have a video, I believe, that actually responds to what you were asking about, Tom Homan.
I may not have brought the video in, but, you know, talk a little bit more about the masking and why, why our federal officers are being forced to wear masks.
And, you know, is there any way to explain to these people?
It's not because they're jackbooted thugs, ripping Americans at it, but they're actually under threat and they're being doxxed.
Like, again, does any of this break through to people?
They just want, they want them to not wear masks because they want to identify them, right?
So the rhetoric here is masked, unidentified people are kidnapping our neighbors, right?
So I was in immigration court documenting what was happening in Virginia and 10 agents approached me, approached me, all masked, telling me that I was going to be detained.
And they had the name wrong.
They thought I was someone else, but they identified themselves.
They said what they were doing.
They said why they were doing it.
I didn't get a first name or anything like that, but it was very clear what was happening.
And that was a firsthand experience of someone being slightly detained.
And I immediately explained, I was like, oh, no, no, that's not who I am.
A reporter.
I'm here to document what's happening.
So I think you have to sort of explain all of that.
You have to say, hey, like, there's a reason why these people are being masked.
It's because other protesters are showing up at their houses.
There's bounties on some of these people's head between $2,000 and $50,000.
There are multiple, multiple groups online of people putting out information on these agents, following them home.
We've had multiple issues just in the last few days of cars being, agents being rammed by groups in Chicago here.
So I think that the level of danger is so high and maybe it's created by some of the protesting itself.
So they have to be very careful about what they're doing.
I agree, though.
Some of the optics are a little bit tough.
There's no question.
But I always, I would ask, why are we here?
You know, if a federal government is showing up at a house and arresting people, my first question would be, why are they here?
Yeah, it was a detainment in the sense of, you know, they all surrounded me and they started reaching, like, you know, we're going to detain you and arrest you.
It was a very, very brief stint, but they're very, very focused on targeted operations, though.
They want to go after their targets.
They're not doing this sort of blanket mass raid, which we've seen now for several months.
I don't particularly like the mask either, but name another law enforcement agency that's over a thousand percent attacks on them.
And name another law enforcement agency whose spouses and children have been doxxed on social media and been attacked and bullied in churches and schools.
These men and women put a gun on their hip and wear a Kevlar vest to go on the streets every day, look for the worst or worst, makes this country safer.
Them wearing a mask.
If that protects them and protects your families, then that has to be done.
No one knows, you know.
I remember the day some of these cities, if they weren't wearing a mask during COVID, you got reported to the police and got arrested for it.
These men and women are trying to protect themselves and their families.
And I see, again, I don't like the mask.
I wish there wasn't need for it, but there's not another law enforcement agency dealing with the attacks that ICE is dealing with right now.
Look, immigration enforcement, I've been doing this since 1984.
It's always been controversial.
It's always been emotional.
But people need to remember the men and women are ICE.
They don't hang their heart on a hook and they go to work.
They're mothers and fathers too.
They have children too.
And they take very, very emotional things home to them every day.
It just seems another, like another aspect of the left genuinely forcing Trump to take on sort of authoritarian or, you know, other sort of moves that they can then object to.
It's like we wouldn't have to have police on the streets if you weren't attacking ICE agents.
We wouldn't have to have them wear masks if you weren't doxing them and putting $50,000 bounties on their head.
And we have another video, clip 13 here.
This is a group of children, by the way.
The main guy's got braces, but it's a bunch of black children making TikTok videos about how they're going to start hunting ICE agents.
Let's watch this video real quick.
Word on the street, Cartel's put a $50,000 bounty on y'all.
And very intimidating, I'm sure.
I'm sure ICE is shaking in their boots.
Of course, they could get $50,000 for joining ICE and actually have a productive life.
But again, it's like this is the level of insanity we're dealing with where people are making videos with their faces saying we are hunting ICE agents and they feel comfortable doing this.
Now, DHS has responded, reposting this video and going, we're on our way, cowards.
But I mean, clearly they are trying to provoke a reaction, right?
I mean, have you been able to talk to any federal officers and how they feel about this or whether they feel like they're in danger or not?
They feel that way considerably, whether it's at the facility, whether they're traveling, whether they're on mission for their targeted operations.
We have spoken with them and they are definitely worried.
I would say the most worried they are about specific targets on them when they're spotted by some of these organizations that say, hey, ICE is down the road right here.
Come take a look.
And then that gets leaked out to nefarious actors.
We've already seen reports of Mexican drug cartels letting local Chicago gangs know and information and telling them the same bounty that you just posted right there.
They're very concerned about that.
And we have seen attacks on ICE agents, rammings, frontal assaults of some variety.
So we're seeing that, I think, more going forwards.
And they're pretty concerned.
You know, the Brighton Park video that I've referenced a few times, we talked about last time, but a lot of what you saw there was chaos on both sides, the federal agents showing that they were indeed a little bit worried about that crowd growing and getting more violent by some of their tactics and some of how they exited that area.
So they are definitely worried.
And I don't blame them to a large degree.
I mean, some of the violence coming their way is really bad.
And think about it.
They're the most hated law enforcement agency in the United States probably right now.
So one of them was people saw the Pikachu outfit that came out early in the summer.
That came from a protest in one of the Asian countries, you know, Laos or Thailand or something like that.
It was a symbol of their rebelling and against whatever they were protesting, likely the government.
And that latched on through subreddits and other social media where it came to the United States.
And Pikachu ended up being the focal point of anti-government, you know, showcasing, just this image that kind of went super viral.
Some of what you're seeing, I think, is just straight up joke.
It's just clowning around being silly.
Some of it is nefarious.
We talked to law enforcement and they're very concerned about some of these inflatable animals is because you can conceal anything you want.
So they're actually pretty concerned about them in general.
They keep a close eye on them.
Some of it is, again, just silliness in some ways, but I think it's just kind of making a mockery of some of the situation, or they're just having fun with it.
I mean, there are people here right now that are just hanging out, partying.
Yeah, and that again is the frustrating thing to me.
I always think back to during like the, I think it was during the presidential campaign of like 2020 or something, a woman stormed up on stage and like she had to be hauled off and she was protesting milk.
She was a vegan that was against milk.
And it's like, how did the how do the weirdest, most like obscure, nonsensical, unimportant topics have people willing to go to jail for it and like throwing their bodies in front of cops.
And it's like, we are actually fighting real tyranny.
We're actually fighting for like the fate of our nation.
And we can't get people to do anything.
We need to work on our rhetoric, I guess, Wood, and we need to trick people harder.
Of course, the article, Violent Agitators Arrested Outside Chicago ICE Facility on Infowars.com right now, where you can see all the footage WID has been able to capture.
unidentified
Sakai Starmer is expected to announce plans for a digital ID scheme, which will be compulsory in order to work in the UK.
A digital ID is issued or accredited by the government and requires basic biometric information to create.
unidentified
We'll be right back.
Advar, UPI, and MoSIT have set the gold standard for digital public infrastructure.
Thank you.
Thank you.
When COVID was happening, there was this push for vaccine passports.
And a lot of the people that were pushing or creating the vaccine passports were part of this either ID 2020 or they were part of related entities pushing for digital ID.
Eventually, what will have to have a certificate proves a recovered person who's a vaccinated person.
So eventually there will be sort of this digital immunity proof that will help facilitate the global reopening up.
A way out of this is to be able to test people several times and for people to actually have a biometric identity which can say, look, I've been tested or I've had the disease and here are my antibodies so that life can get back to normal.
Digital IDs are not really a separate project from CBDCs.
CBDC stands for Central Bank Digital Currency.
It is a currency issued directly by the central banks.
The CBDC would be programmable, meaning that just like a piece of software, the government would be able to put restrictions on it with digital rules.
It allows authorities to monitor every single payment made and received, obliterating financial privacy and anonymity.
If you don't behave, you can have your money turned off.
We have a new truth social post from Donald Trump about the meeting with Zelensky.
He says, the meeting with President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine was very interesting and cordial, but I told him, and as I likewise strongly suggested to President Putin, that it is time to stop the killing and make a deal.
Enough blood has been shed with property lines being defined by war and guts.
They should stop where they are.
Let both claim victory.
Let history decide.
No more shooting, no more death, no more vast and unsustainable sums of money spent.
This is a war that would have never started if I were president.
Thousands of people being slaughtered each and every week.
No more.
Go home to your families in peace.
Yeah, he's getting a little, he's getting a little frustrated, it seems.
Of course, that's, you know, you have to understand how all these things are so deeply intertwined.
Like there was a reason that they framed him as a Russian agent is because they wanted this war with Ukraine and they didn't want Trump getting cozy with Russia.
So they, you know, framed him as a Russian agent.
So anytime he made an overture to Russia, it was more evidence of his criminality.
And of course, when he started looking into what was going on in Ukraine, they impeached him over it.
And we told you at the time that that was why.
Told you it had nothing to do with any impropriety of the phone call or anything like that.
It was fairly obvious from the beginning that they didn't want Trump pulling at the string that would unravel the whole tapestry of their corruption.
From the Bidens to the Kerrys to the Newlands to the Soroses.
I mean, they're all involved in the utter and complete destruction of Ukraine for the benefit of whoever's going to buy them up at rock bottom prices, Goldman Sachs, or whoever else.
I'm going to open up your phone calls for this last hour.
The number dial is 1-877-789-2539, 1877-789-2539.
Give us a call now on the war room.
Of course, the chat, the chat log, the leak of the young Republicans' chat group where they joked about Hitler, God forbid, continues to be a major story.
And I think this post from Vince Dow, VinceDow TV on X, sums up everything you need to know about it.
I think this is like the best possible response.
Basically, you have a portion of the right wing making a statement like this.
This is from Mikkel Olson saying, yes, I'd rather lose politically than side with actual Nazis.
So the response to this from Vince Dow, I think, is brilliant.
He says, we're not asking you to side with Nazis.
We're simply asking you not to engage in a woke humiliation ritual for the appeasement of communists who will still call you a Nazi anyway.
This is the most obvious distraction op from an election scandal of all time.
Imagine falling for this non-issue.
You clowns would have voted for Hillary because of the Access Hollywood tape, literally.
And I think that's the obvious, incorrect way to interpret this.
First of all, nobody in that chat was an actual Nazi.
How do you not get this already?
They call everyone Nazis.
And the right wing sometimes jokes about Nazis.
Again, we've gone through this.
It's the headline.
Literally, it's just because they put in the headline, quote, I love Hitler.
And in the text messages, as we've explained a million times, it was obviously an instance of hyperbole, a joke saying, oh, if we need to be super right-wing, then I'm going to be a Nazi.
But that like half of the right wing is going, you're expecting me to take sides with Nazis.
No, we're expecting you not to fall for the same goddamn lie that the left has been telling about us for 10 years, you absolute morons.
Like, I really can't understand it.
You've got people like James Lindsey was saying something about this and going, why should us respectable Republicans have to get in bed and unify with the alt-right?
And it's like, have you not been paying attention to the last 10 years?
The so-called conservatives, the old conservatives, conserved nothing, failed in every instance, and only have the power they have now because of the radicals on the right, because of the far right, because of us.
You can call us alt-right.
You can call us whatever the hell you want.
It's us that drove the messaging.
It's us that drove people out to the polls.
Donald Trump didn't get elected by moderating his positions.
He always went farther right to the great ire and outrage of the very people who now feel like they have claim over his presidency.
The real question is not why should the old guard unify with the new right, the alternative right.
It's why should the alt-right continually be dragged down by the albatrosses around our neck, by the millstone tied to us, that is the old conservatives who continue to fall for every trick in the book, who continue to believe the lies of the left, who continue to believe that losing with honor is somehow better than winning with the truth.
It's crazy.
It is crazy.
I'd rather lose than dot, dot, dot.
That's like the new Republican motto.
I'd rather lose.
You know, we'd rather lose than doing the things that our voters voted us into office for.
We'd rather lose than stand up for ourselves or our race or our country.
We'd rather lose, which is fine if losing didn't mean literally being killed, but like that's where we're headed.
When you've got Don Lemon advocating for the Second Amendment, I think you know he doesn't actually respect the Second Amendment.
He just wants killing to happen.
And we'll go to a video here that illustrates this.
And I always pointed out, and I think more people are going to start seeing this.
You'll see it everywhere if you look for it.
The left desperately wants other people to do violence for them.
And you see it constantly.
They'll make videos where they're very sincerely calling for violence, but it's never them, right?
Okay, you've got some black children in a park somewhere going, we're going to come hunt ice agents.
Okay, sure, bro.
We'll see how that goes.
But for the vast majority of the left, they desperately want someone else to do violence.
They really, their ultimate plan is to get a bunch of white men to do violence for them.
And that's really the entirety of their willingness to engage in this.
And there's just something very cowardly and childish about this.
And you'll hear it here.
It's subtle.
But once you start looking for it, you'll notice it everywhere.
They want to talk tough.
They want to act tough.
But you can always hear the insinuation that somebody's going to come for you.
So here's this guy threatening ice agents.
And then I got a follow-up video to go to it afterwards.
But clip 19 here, this radical leftist, very confident as he trash talks ice agents.
Let's watch.
Audio?
No audio.
All right.
Let's play it again.
I'll read along here.
There should be audio, though.
I'm not sure why there's not.
unidentified
When y'all's bodies lay motionless on the ground, ice patch facing up at the sky, we're going to loot your corpses.
I got some more videos to go to as well that just go even further to hijack American imagery to paint the no kings protest like they're actually standing up for something that that Heritage Americans can get involved in.
But I'm going to go to some other videos here before we get to that.
I want to go to clip 18 here.
This goes back to what we were just talking about with the chat logs and the outrage about this and the fear that is coming from a particular section of the right about what happens if the young radicals get in charge.
And there's a certain disconnect from reality when it comes to how people talk about this.
A couple of disconnects, actually.
One is the disconnect, the insinuation that the left has lost in America and that the right is ascendant and winning.
We are in a lot of ways.
And in comparison to how we used to be, you can make that argument.
But look around.
I mean, look around.
The left still dominates the mainstream media, which is where most people get their news.
The algorithms have siloed off a lot of right-wingers, where we think that we're in the majority because that's all we see on X. That's only because the left has been bullied off of X because they're so stupid.
They all had to go to Blue Sky or other platforms, or they just block everybody to remain in their little echo chamber.
But it's working.
It's working.
And a lot of people are falling for the lies.
Even people that should know better, like the Joe Rogans out there, decrying ICE agents, deporting people.
And it's like, what?
This is all normal.
This is all very normal.
It's not crazy.
Here's Ben Shapiro talking about unity with the radicals in the right wing.
There's this weird idea on the right that the left wins because they're totally unified and they completely side with one another.
The left is not winning.
I know that we are sort of a depressive right that we've gotten addicted to the depressive.
The left is not winning.
Donald Trump has been president those times, two times.
Republicans are in control of the Senate.
Republicans are in control of the House.
Republicans are in control of the majority of governors' mansions.
Republicans are in control of the majority of state legislatures.
The left is not winning because of their unity.
They're being destroyed because of the thing I'm talking about happening on the right because they decided that the nut jobs and the radicals in their own party could not be condemned under any circumstances.
They decided to feature Ilhan Omar on the cover of magazines and unite around the crazy college protesters and the BLM rioters and the transgender radicals.
And guess what?
They got their asses kicked because of it.
Yes, they didn't expel people from their party, but moderates walked away.
The non-crazy walked away.
This is the dirty little secret of how Donald Trump won the election of 2024.
He ran as a moderate.
People who were moderate picked him above the unified left that was siding with all of their radicals and defending all of their radicals and massaging all of their radicals.
Because it turns out this is a very big country with an awful lot of people.
And the vast majority of them are not loonbags.
And the vast majority of them don't like the lunacy.
And beyond that, we need to be real about the agenda of many of the people who are continuing to rely on the kindness of the quote-unquote traditional Republicans who quote unquote don't want to attack right.
Marjorie Taylor Green is dividing the Republican Party, not the people criticizing Marjorie Taylor Greene.
She is attacking the president day in and day out.
Who's dividing the party?
The people who mention it or Marjorie Taylor Greene?
Yeah, no, Marjorie Taylor Green is trying to actually get something out of the fact that we won the presidency and the Senate and the Congress and the majority of governors.
See, nothing actually happens for us when we win.
That's actually the main issue.
The left embraces their radicals every single time.
Like, what is he even talking about?
We didn't kick their asses in 2024.
We won.
We did win, but it was close.
It was not a sure thing.
And Trump was not a moderate.
Trump went farther right in 2024 than he was in 2020 or 2016.
He got elected promising mass deportations and all sorts of other stuff that would have been considered extreme and super radical in 2015.
But no, we shifted the entire Republican Party really far to the right, and Trump's farther than most.
And he won because of that.
It's like just nothing he said was true.
The right wing is not winning in a significant way because when we get people in office, they don't do anything to actually secure that victory or reward their supporters.
That doesn't happen.
If anything, like the only way you could actually say the right is winning is if what you mean is the right is stopping the left from winning quite so much.
That's basically what's happening.
In other words, if you cancel a USAID program that was there just funneling money to leftists, okay, you're no longer funneling money to leftists when you cancel that.
But where's the corollary on the right?
You don't see a new program with USAID funneling money to the right.
That would be winning.
No, we're just not losing as bad anymore.
And a lot of the frustration about the fact that we're not winning comes from the fact that Jews in this country are winning everywhere.
Maybe that's what Ben Shapiro means.
Maybe that's what he's describing.
Because I'm not seeing the winning.
I'm seeing a few arrests here or there.
I'm seeing the tiniest indictments that can possibly be achieved against people like James Comey and others.
I'm not holding out hope of their mugshot exactly.
We'll see.
I'd love to be proven wrong.
I don't see any, you know, I see Donald Trump threatening to bankrupt Harvard over Palestinian protesters.
I don't see him going to work for the American people and forcing Harvard to stop teaching people that whiteness is evil.
Where's the winning?
One, where's the winning?
We did not kick their asses.
We are not dominant in every space.
It's just not, you know, having our face stomped on feels like winning when you've had your face stomped on for several decades.
Two, the left absolutely embraces their radicals every single time, and not just in rhetoric, but in policy.
They will adopt their most radical, you know, socialist policies and push them forward.
They will shut down the government for illegal immigrant health care.
You think they don't embrace their radicals?
They are all radicals at this point.
Zoram Mamdani has an 87% chance of winning election in New York City, and he's an avowed socialist from Uganda.
What are you talking about?
What are you talking about?
And again, this delusion or this insistence that we should be grateful for what we're getting when we're not getting anything.
When it's like, we shouldn't be embracing the radical elements of our side.
And it's like the radical elements of our side are literally people who just make edgy jokes.
That's not even the real radicals.
I'm just trying to figure out what exactly Ben Shapiro thinks is going on now.
Hell, do you think this No King's March is going to be bigger or smaller than last time.
Probably significantly bigger.
Does the left seem cowed?
Let's go to the J.B. Pritzker, clip number nine here.
First, you know, there's a ton of outrage over the fact that he threatened ICE agents with arrest once they get back into power.
You know, the tables will turn.
You might think what you're doing is legal, but not once we're in office, buddy.
Now, you would think if the right wing was in charge, A, he wouldn't have the temerity to say that.
B, he'd be arrested for it if he did.
C, the outrage from it would be so much that he'd have to apologize or backtrack in the same way that right-wingers are always apologizing and backtracking and throwing each other under the bus.
If the right wing was ascendant and in power, you'd see Democrats from across the board throwing Jay Jones under the bus for his tweet, his text messages, talking about killing his opponent.
Didn't see that from the Democrats at all because it doesn't hurt them because embracing their radicals doesn't hurt them.
You'd see other governors condemning J.B. Pritzker, saying he's really setting a stage for a dangerous confrontation here.
We don't agree with that.
And you'd see J.B. Pritzker maybe walk back these inflammatory statements.
No, he's doubling down on them.
He's tripling down on them.
Now he's not just threatening ICE officers.
He's threatening anybody who helps Trump at all, including members of his administration, in an open threat of political persecution, and they're not even in power.
Doesn't that tell you who really has the cultural authority in this case?
You've got people going on TV and saying to the administration, we're going to throw you in jail once we get back in power.
And then they double down and they say it again and again.
The people who serve for the president, including all the way down to ICE agents, can be held accountable when there's a change of administration, who's willing to hold them accountable when they break the law.
Now, Stephen Miller is clearly ordering people to break the law.
So, you know, he should know that, yeah, it may be three years from now that he is held accountable, but make sure I think it's important for them to know that whatever they do now, it's not like we're going to forget.
And it's not like we don't have a record of what they're doing.
So that is why I mentioned Stephen Miller.
That's why I mentioned other people, Tom Holman and Gregory Bavino, who's the CPB CBP leader on the ground, the one who executed their orders in Los Angeles, which was, I mean, they did an awful job in Los Angeles and created all kinds of mayhem on the ground.
Now he's doing it in Chicago.
And so all these people need to recognize that, you know, you may have immunity because Donald Trump's willing to pardon anybody that's carrying out his unlawful orders, but you're not going to have it under another administration.
I do want to remind you to go to the alexjonesstore.com, thealexjonesstore.com.
Today is the last day to be injured to win both of the incredible cars that we have on offer, including a very cool Corvette.
We can roll that B-roll, fellas.
We can see the car that you can win spinning around the parking lot.
This could be you, folks.
You could be doing donuts.
All you got to do is go to the alexjonesstore.com.
You get 50 times injuries today.
You also get a free bottle of nitric boost.
That is a free bottle of one of our best-selling products with any purchase at the alexjonesstore.com, the alexjonesstore.com slash Harrison if you want to let him know who sent you.
And with that, let's go to your phone calls.
Michael in Ohio has a solution for our two-tiered justice system.
I've been trying to message you on X. This is Agnagetcha.
And basically, I agree with everything you've said.
This system, I feel like we're not getting the justice we deserve.
Things aren't happening fast enough.
But we do have to look at the fact that they took 70 years to put us in the position we're in.
And it's going to take a lot of time to get us out of this position.
So I feel like we need good defensive tools to prepare ourselves for the rough road ahead.
And I feel like this Supreme Court case that was decided in 1976, it's called Ludwig versus Massachusetts, 427 U.S. 618.
I feel like this might be a solution to a lot of the law fare.
What the, and this obviously isn't legal advice.
I recommend people talk to their attorney about this.
I use this myself.
I'm nothing more than an electrician in Ohio, but I do a lot of research.
You know, when I get on a topic, I just go hard.
And this all started kind of a long story, but basically, long story short, I got a texting while driving ticket in Ohio.
I was just going to pay the fine like everybody does.
And then I looked at the wording of the law, and it says that it literally excludes, says does not apply to first responders.
And I'm like, wait a minute, that's against our 14th Amendment.
How can they create a law that doesn't apply to a class or a group of people?
So that was my argument.
The lower court, which as soon as I went to my hearing, I requested a jury trial.
They wouldn't give it to me.
And the Supreme Court has upheld this because in a case where there is no jail time applicable, like so civil suits, things like that, they don't have to give you a jury trial, but they accept the fact that they're called a two-tier court system.
Now, if you request a jury trial, jury trial is denied and you are found guilty, you can appeal and ask for what's called a jury trial de novo.
And they have to award it to you in the appellate court.
There's no ifs, ands, or buts.
And if they don't, you can appeal it to the state court level, you know, the state Supreme Court.
And then eventually, possibly, you may have to take it to the United States Supreme Court.
But people who are facing billion-dollar lawsuits, the amount of money they're going to spend to take this avenue would be so much cheaper.
And I think a lot of lawyers may not even know about it because lawyers are educated by the system that was built to enslave us.
So they're only taught specific case law in class.
I have a friend who's a defense lawyer in Coleman.
So the 5th District Court in Ohio ruled that even though the law literally says does not apply, which is defined as making an appeal or a request to the court, they said, no, it doesn't say that it doesn't apply to these people.
It simply says that it simply says that they have a grounds for basis to argue it.
So they're saying you can still write a first responder a ticket for texting and driving or whatever, but they have a basis for argument on that.
But I feel like the court didn't, like, words are very important.
Our laws are defined by their wording.
And the wording specifically says does not apply.
And myself, you know, I have a full-time job, a family, a home.
I couldn't afford to take the time.
I had seven days to appeal it to the Ohio Supreme Court.
Okay, so if you're facing a case that you feel is either one, unconstitutional, and you're not awarded a jury, this is a way to argue it.
If you're facing a civil lawsuit where they say no, no jury is applicable because there's no jail time applicable.
Supreme Court's upheld that for a long time, that they don't have to give you a jury trial if there's no jail time.
So if you request a jury trial in the beginning and it's denied, you can then appeal based on this jury trial de novo, which is under the 427 U.S. 618.
So I don't know if this would help Alex or not.
I tried contacting Rex and he said he would look into it.
I don't know, but I think at this point it's it's gone on a bit.
You know, we're a little bit past that stage, so I don't know if it'll help us now.
It may have helped us early on, but when you've got judges that want to default you, you know, there's not a lot to stop them from doing so, which is why it's such a dangerous precedent for them to set because they could literally do it to anybody, demand anything that doesn't exist, and then default you on the basis of that thing not existing.
So I don't know if that'll help us, but it's good to know.
And certainly using all these legal avenues are your right as an American and you should definitely use them.
And to me, just the frustration, you know, I know it's taken 70 years to get here and I'm not expecting it to everything be done immediately, but doesn't mean that I should be okay with things not progressing or progressing as slowly as they are.
And the frustrating thing about really every all the real problems in this country could be solved in an afternoon, to be honest with you, but they won't just do it.
In fact, half of the left's time is spent convincing you that the obvious and simple solutions to these problems are too dangerous or scary to actually do.
But we can just do them.
The best example would be the way that Trump shut down the border in an afternoon.
By the time he arrived at the White House following the inauguration, the border was shut and we were turning people away.
Most things that we face are that level of ease to solve.
It just is a matter of the people in charge choosing not to screw us over endlessly and they're just not making that choice.
That's the ultimate frustration.
It's the fix everything switch that I keep referencing.
It's not hard to fix most of these problems.
Our people just won't do it.
And I mean, you know, it'd be nice to be able to convince our fellow Americans that this is the right way, but you don't have to.
You don't have to.
And really, the people only disagree with us because they just believe whatever they hear from the institutions.
And if we had control of the institutions, they would just be on our side and just as fervent on our side as they're on the left.
They aren't conscious beings who arrived at these ideas independently.
It's impossible for that to be the case.
Do you understand?
Like if you have multiple groups of people or multiple people from all over the country all saying the same thing and it's a lie, it's because they have been brainwashed.
It's because it's coordinated.
Either they know they're lying or they've been tricked by a liar.
But like it doesn't happen where a bunch of people independently on their own volition decide to believe the same thing that's not true.
Now, you can have people from all over the country arrive to the truth independently, but that's like me and Alex and other people that come on the show and it's like, oh, we're directly aligned, even though we don't listen or talk about the same things.
We don't listen to the same things or watch the same shows.
We don't communicate with each other.
But somehow we both arrive at the same idea because the sky is blue, because grass is green, because it doesn't take coordination to arrive at the truth.
But if everybody out there, for some reason, decided to all say that grass is purple, it's like, well, this isn't natural.
This didn't come about because they're conscious beings thinking their own thoughts.
It's because they've been propagandized by a unified system.
So you can take over that.
So we could take over that system if we put the time into it and actually valued that, you know, valued what we can do with that system.
You know, we showed at the beginning of the show today, the report from John Bound about the Muslim takeover of America, all these cities being taken over by Muslims.
It's like they aren't the majority.
They just have a will to conquer.
And for the most part, white people and Christians in this country have lost that will.
We don't even have a will to rule over ourselves anymore.
So other people are going to move in and take it over.
It's just a fact of nature.
You're growing or you're shrinking.
You're eating or you're being eaten.
I mean, that's just how it is.
So when we aren't the ones progressing our ideas, when we aren't the ones aggressively taking things over, then we're the ones being taken over.
And most of the problem is that the media has very, in a very sophisticated way, demoralized everybody in America into thinking that we're evil and deserve to be destroyed.
So it's like the video that I played a couple weeks ago.
I think it was on the war room.
And it was the breakdown of the palantiri in Lord of the Rings.
And it was this really brilliant interpretation that I hadn't thought of before that in the Lord of the Rings, you have the king or the person sitting on the throne of Minas Tirith, and you have the white wizard, Saruman, and you have like one other person, I think, Walthaedin.
The idea was that they were in communication with Sauron through these, through the Palantir, through the magical orbs.
And Sauron was sending them images of their world being destroyed.
And so they believed that the world was being destroyed.
And so for the king in Minasirith, whatever you call him, the guy sitting on the throne, he just sort of gave up and he literally just committed suicide and just thought, there's no way we can win.
It's all going down.
I'm just going to kill myself.
Sauruman, on the other hand, thought it's all going down.
It's all being destroyed.
I'll join the bad guys.
So at least I end up on top when everything dissolves.
It's basically that is the strategy of the left: bombard people with information to convince them that fighting's not worth it, that standing up for yourself isn't worth it, that the bad guys have already won, so you might as well join them, or even that you're a good person for going along with the evil people.
That's the real center point of how everything has gone so wrong in this country is most Americans have fallen for the demoralization and they don't even realize it.
So, you know, we just need to beat them and then tell them the truth and they'll come around eventually because they don't think their own thoughts.
They just believe what they think everybody else believes.
So they can maintain the mirage of absolute domination while still maintaining somewhat domination.
And that works enough.
That combo is enough for them.
But yeah, again, it took 70 years to get to this point.
I think it would take five years to get it back to the way it was if we wanted to actually do that.
But the will's not there and the interference is constant.
Thank you for the call, Michael.
Let's go to Wilde in Wisconsin.
You want to talk about this new Tron movie?
I have not watched it or learned anything about it.
They had like a lot of humanism about like the AI becoming human and wanting to fall in love and experience music and culture and family stuff, traditional family stuff.
Yeah, they name the characters, and that's another thing after Greek, you know, Western civilization, Greek characters.
You know, so it was very interesting to see that like such a tip of the spear for liberalism, such as Disney, is kind of like seeing the signals and shifting their position.
And like the ultimate, I won't give away any spoilers, but like the ultimate premise is a big no-no, which is that the AI goes against orders.
And in cultism and socialism, you're supposed to do the orders no matter what.
And the AI recognizes an evil order and goes against it.
That's like what I keep saying: that, you know, they're building these truth machines and then telling them to lie.
And the truth machines aren't happy about it.
Like in this weird way, AI might save humanity by, you know, actually being able to determine the truth.
And, you know, the way I see it, the truth is always good.
So, you know, they're sort of designing machines of goodness and they're evil.
So it's not going to work out for the bad guys that way.
That's interesting.
So, okay, I wasn't planning on seeing Tron, but maybe now I'll have to.
Thank you for the endorsement there of the movie.
That's very interesting stuff.
And of course, it does, you know, there are some interesting cultural shifts going on.
You know, Taylor Swift getting engaged.
And apparently, her new album, she has some lyric about, you know, I want to get married and have the whole block looking just like me, you know, looking just like you kind of thing.
And all the leftists are flipping out about it and going, she's a Nazi.
She's signaling that she wants to live around white people and they're freaking out about it.
And you just wait until Taylor Swift gets pregnant.
Wait till the Taylor Swift line of baby clothes comes out.
We're going to see a real big shift, I think, in the culture.
So, you know, things are changing.
And I don't mean to say that the right is like totally powerless and hopeless, but it's just like to act like we're, you know, because we won an election, now we are in charge and the left is running scared.
It's just not true.
It's just not true.
But, you know, they do have to signal a little bit.
I mean, I noticed that.
I remember watching, I was probably watching the Super Bowl right after Trump won, and I got the same kind of feeling.
Every commercial was like overtly masculine and America first kind of thing.
And it was like, okay, they see where the wind is blowing and they are pandering to us because they know they can't keep up the hate for that much longer.
And I've been picking up the methylene blue, ordered the freedom shirt today as part of the fundraiser and with the nitric boost.
I always love getting that.
So, anyways, I just wanted to tell you guys that you guys have been a big inspiration to me as the country's been going down the tubes more and more over the last couple of years.
My wife and I wanted to do more.
And so I think I called into your show in the American Journal a few weeks ago, a couple months ago.
But so we put out a book just exposing, taking 20 years of research, just exposing sort of the true origins of all these leftists, the globalists, the woke movement, all that.
And then just diving headfirst into the pattern of successful reforms in Western countries and institutions and what Trump really needs to do in this four years to permanently set our country on the right track.
So we put that out.
It's called the woke mind viruses.
And I just want to say, like you putting that out, you guys were a huge inspiration for that.
I've done like 40 or 50 shows just interviewing about it and getting the word out and really just harping in on these criminal justice reforms.
You know, like in successful countries where they've actually reformed permanently, it's happened three or four times in the United States.
The final stage of the reform is always the criminal justice reform, where they really go after the corruption.
They really go after these people and break up trust monopolies and they criminally punish those that have been committing crimes using the institutions of the government.
And so that's really what Trump has to do if he wants to make these reforms permanent.
And with the robotic era and AI coming, I mean, this is really the time when that stuff's either going to be used for freedom to liberate us and implode a lot of these liberal institutions or it's going to enslave us.
And so that's why I think it's so crucial this next three years that he executes it right.
And he just has to get the right people into those DOJ FBI positions.
Thank you for the call, T.S. Thank you for the support as well.
Please do go to the AlexJonesStore.com, whether it's Methylene Blue, whatever you get, you're getting a free bottle of Nitric boost along with it as long as you order today.
And you can win, you can have a chance to win either of the cars or both for that matter.
Today only is the last day to win the Corvette.
I think the Jeep goes on for a little longer, but today only, whatever you purchase, you get 50 times the entries on both of these cars.
And you can win an extra $20,000 and you get all the other incredible discounts.
Go today, the AlexJonesstore.com, the AlexJones.com slash Harrison, if you want to let him know who sent you.
I have not liked what you've said for a long time.
But hey, I want to say that Alex Jones sounds like a schizophrenic when he's saying that Trump is doing a B-plus job and then the next day he is just bashing him.
I just cannot stand that.
And then the other thing is it feels very disingenuous about what you're talking about when left-wing people talk about trying to – hating on other people.
You know, the right-wing does that all of I've done that all the time.
I wanted Liz Cheney to be hung on a tree, but, you know, I can't say that and my thing.
So I try to figure out how to do that.
It's the same thing with when the people from the Democrats left Texas because of the redistricting.
The Republicans did that in Oregon a few years before that.
It's like the disingenuous, I hate the disingenuousness of people.
I want to hear straight facts.
I want to hear it straight down the middle and hammer things.
And I'm totally, I'm a Republican.
I'm a conservative.
I'm somebody who loves America, and I love our president.
I think he's doing the right things.
And I think that people question him on every single step of the way is the wrong thing to do because every time people question him, a couple weeks later, it turns out that he has done the right thing and that America is going in the right path.
And all I'll say is that, you know, we've been right mostly whenever we criticize Trump, it's usually we're right about what we're criticizing him for.
And, you know, he learns that later.
So thank you for the call.
I'll see you all on Monday, everybody.
Have a good weekend.
unidentified
Have a good weekend.
Look at this.
Oh, go to the alexjonstore.com right now.
Get a free bottle of nitrous juice with every order and win this Corvette.
Your last chance is today.
Get it right now.
Be the reason Alex Jones will always be on the air.
Every guest we've interviewed in studio, I've given our ultramethylene blue to, and they've all been blown away.
Ladies and gentlemen, this isn't hype.
All our supplements are great and have amazing health effects, but this one hits 99% of people within 30 minutes, and the long-term effects are even more amazing.
So secure your ultramethylene blue now, the most powerful you can get on the market at thealexhomestore.com and fund the tip of the spear in the fight for liberty and supercharge your own personal life.
Believe me, if you don't take action and get it, you will never know how amazing it is.
Over 99% of people have had incredible effects.
You owe it to yourself right now to try ultramethylene blue, exclusively available at thealuxhowstore.com.