Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
InfoWars. | |
| Tomorrow's news. | ||
| Today, welcome, ladies and gentlemen to the war room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith coming to you live this Friday afternoon, Friday evening. | ||
| It is the 26th of September 2025, and what a show we have for you today. | ||
| I mean, I um I'm not going to talk about too much because I just got to get right into it. | ||
| We got so much news. | ||
| We've got the FBI indictments or the indictments against uh James Comey coming down, the promise of more indictments. | ||
| I'll tell you everything we know about that, and that will we'll start off with that. | ||
| We also have terroristic activity from the left attacking ice facilities all across the country today in the response to that truly maddening. | ||
| Uh, we're also gonna be joined by Jay Dyer in the second hour and Tiffany Sioncy in the third. | ||
| Both of them huge topics to cover. | ||
| We'll probably talk about international politics with Jay, as well as touch on some spiritual stuff since I feel like he could he could guide us better than just about anybody, and Tiffany Sioncy will be talking about the Ellisons, Larry Ellison and his son, who have basically over the last nine months taken total control of the most powerful media outlets in America. | ||
| Why would that be and what does that entail? | ||
| We'll talk to her about that. | ||
| But I want to begin today, like I said, with the indictment of James Comey. | ||
| It's been a long time coming. | ||
| They slow walked it. | ||
| They tried to have the statute of limitations expire. | ||
| Trump had to intervene in the last hour, basically, and put somebody in who got one or two charges across, you know, over the goal line in time. | ||
| But this may just be the start. | ||
| That's what we're hearing. | ||
| We're getting a lot of information about this, and people in the know say this really is just the beginning of the the avalanche to follow. | ||
| Uh let's go now to John Solomon, who broke this story, clip 20. | ||
| Here's he here he is on uh Hannity talking about the James Comey indictment. | ||
| watch. | ||
| John, let's start with the news and what you're hearing tonight. | ||
| Well, listen, uh, the key testimony against James Comey is gonna come from his inner circle. | ||
| One of the people that he trusted and ran the FBI alongside of will be the key witness saying, No, he authorized me to uh leak information, contrary to what he testified to Congress. | ||
| That's gonna be a difficult case for James Comey to Ben. | ||
| I just want to step back. | ||
| Yeah, well, it could be McCabe, it could be uh uh uh Daniel Richie, it could be James Baker. | ||
| I keep an eye on James Baker. | ||
| Remember the documents we had on your show a couple of weeks ago. | ||
| All three of those are in uh position to testify they were authorized to leak. | ||
| We'll see which one is person three when we uh uh in the indictment. | ||
| But uh I would bet it's James Baker from what I know. | ||
| The um the second uh thing that is just the pure magnitude of what happened today. | ||
| Fifty years ago this year, an attorney general was convicted for the first time in history of crimes tonight for the first time on a history. | ||
| An FBI director is indicted on crimes, and both men face the same charges. | ||
| False statements and obstruction of justice. | ||
| It's an extraordinary moment, a grave moment when a director of the FBI is accused of this level of criminality. | ||
| Your sources tonight are telling you what John Solomon what could be next. | ||
| I think other uh government officials are in danger of being indicted in the coming weeks. | ||
| Some in the FBI, some in other parts of the government. | ||
| This is the beginning of a large accountability uh roundup in government. | ||
| And I think what's really remarkable, most of my career I've spent uncovering FBI cover-ups. | ||
| The FBI has a long history of misleading Congress. | ||
| Comey falls into that. | ||
| But the evidence against Comey tonight comes from the FBI and its new director, uh Kash Patel, who promised radical transparency, and he actually provides the key piece of evidence that leads to this indictment. | ||
| If you're a member of Congress and you've been tired of lying, uh being lied to by the FBI, tonight's the first time the FBI actually did something about it. | ||
| They turned in their own man tonight. | ||
| I think that's an extraordinary part of this story. | ||
| And that's just one of the stories being told right now. | ||
| The there's two uh I g and I think they are somewhat related, but they're the revelations about January 6th and the hundreds of agents that were actually on the ground there in plain clothes. | ||
| We'll tell you all about that. | ||
| But of course, the James Comey indictment is we hope just the first of many, and that is what Trump is saying uh from InfoWars.com. | ||
| Trump suggests more indictments coming following ex-FBI director Comey's indictment. | ||
| And we'll show you that video on the other side. | ||
| Additional prosecutions of deep sw uh deep state swamp creatures will soon be forthcoming. | ||
| President Trump indicated Friday. | ||
| Who will be next? | ||
| Lucita James, I think should be on the top of that list, but it's a very long list. | ||
| It's a very long list. | ||
| I wonder, I wonder who's on it. | ||
| I wonder if uh Merrick Garland and Alejandro Majorcis aren't uh getting their papers in order. | ||
| They should also be on the top of the list for the treason they committed. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Big show we have for you today. | ||
| Jay Dyer joining us later to give us a high-level breakdown of what exactly is wrong with this Godforsaken world. | ||
| And then Tiffany Seancey, who I imagine will be uh perhaps even less white pilled, if that's even possible. | ||
| But hopefully it won't be too blackpilling of a uh episode today because while things are accelerating in the negative, the wars overseas uh seemingly reaching a fever point. | ||
| The people in power seeking to have that boil over into full out world war while simultaneously all of these control mechanisms are being put into place all over the world, including digital ID in the UK. | ||
| I want to touch on that a little bit later as well. | ||
| But you have to understand a lot of the actions of the enemy are in response to the victories that we are having. | ||
| And we have an indictment, folks. | ||
| I mean, for the first time in Trump's entire administration, we actually have an honest to God indictment of a deep state criminal, James Comey. | ||
| And it feels good. | ||
| And it feels really good. | ||
| Now it doesn't feel perfect, okay? | ||
| To be honest with you, I would have liked to see him given the Roger Stone treatment. | ||
| I think he deserves it. | ||
| I think he deserves more than that. | ||
| I think it's actually good police work because I don't trust James Comey not to be holding evidence of perhaps more crimes he's committed. | ||
| So okay, he didn't get his door kicked in. | ||
| There wasn't a you know InfoWars crew there to film him being dragged out of his house in his underwear. | ||
| Okay, so we're not quite getting the same level of humiliation that people on the right received. | ||
| But we do have our first indictment. | ||
| Things are moving. | ||
| Trump promises more indictments coming soon. | ||
| I'll show you that video in just a second. | ||
| We'll get into, you know, what this entails, where this goes from here, what's likely going to happen to James Comey. | ||
| He, of course, is being very uh I don't know, I don't even know, I don't even know what to call him. | ||
| I don't even know what to call him. | ||
| Yeah, no, no. | ||
| It's like half the time he's playing dumb, like he's just some, you know, goofy old man. | ||
| Oh, 86, 47 means kill try. | ||
| Well, gosh, I just took pictures of rocks because I thought they were kind of cool looking. | ||
| Oh, look, they're they're numbers. | ||
| I'll post this on my Instagram. | ||
| It's like, uh, okay, all right. | ||
| I mean, just so just no matter what you see, James Comey saying, no matter what you see, any of these people saying, remember, these people are vicious murderers. | ||
| These people presided over the most underhanded law enforcement operations the world has ever seen. | ||
| This man is a vicious killer, literally. | ||
| Literally, okay. | ||
| So half the time he's going, well, gosh, I post something on my Instagram and suddenly I'm getting calls, and it's like, gee. | ||
| And, you know, he's just acting dumb. | ||
| Like he doesn't know exactly what he's doing. | ||
| And the other half the time he acts like he's uh some sort of, you know, burdened truth teller, a hero trying to uphold the systems that we rely on in the face of this horrible tyranny, and it's just it's pathetic how these people think they can get away with it. | ||
| And again, just like everything. | ||
| It's like I if our bad, if we're gonna have bad guys like this, if we're gonna be surrounded and ruled by demons and villains. | ||
| I would almost prefer them act like it. | ||
| The the sweater wearing, the Bill Gates, the Larry Fink, the all bumbling just oh, cool, cool shell formation. | ||
| Gee, what do you know? | ||
| And well, by the way, I've got a new book to sell, but uh totally unrelated. | ||
| Just shut the hell up. | ||
| Just shut the hell up. | ||
| This guy should be in jail forever. | ||
| Uh, let's go to clip 29 here. | ||
| This is Donald Trump saying, oh, there's more coming, folks. | ||
| There's more coming. | ||
| There's more indictments coming down the line. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come has been indicted. | |
| Who is the next person on your list in this press review? | ||
| It's not a list, but I think there'll be others. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, they're corrupt. | |
| These uh these were corrupt radical left Democrats. | ||
| Because Comey essentially was a he's worse than a Democrat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would say the Democrats are better than Comey. | |
| But uh No, they'll be others. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Look, it was that's my opinion. | |
| Uh they weaponized the Justice Department, like nobody in history. | ||
| What they've done is terrible. | ||
| And so I would I hope they're frankly. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I hope they're out of this because you can't let this happen to a country. | |
| Will you point a permanent U.S. attorney to try to speak Lindsay Halligan has never tried a peace? | ||
| Well, see, but it's a pretty easy case because look, he lied. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You saw my truth today. | |
| He lied. | ||
| Yes, no. | ||
| He didn't say, well, in my opinion, he didn't do a lot of things that maybe he should have, but I don't think he could because he lied. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was a very important question that he was at. | |
| And he wanted to be specific. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But he didn't. | |
| The only thing that happened to him, he didn't think he'd get caught. | ||
| He might not have thought he was going to get caught, but he certainly thought it'd be covered up. | ||
| He certainly thought there was enough, you know, stay behind control to keep him from being indicted. | ||
| Uh, and that that fell short because it was found out. | ||
| It was actually very clever what they did. | ||
| I should have pulled in the video because uh Roger Stone broke it down, but the the stories at uh Joehoft.com, huge exclusive U.S. attorney Eric Siebert had stunning conflict of interest but kept it hidden and got fired. | ||
| So this is the guy that Donald Trump put in charge of the Comey case. | ||
| For nine months, he slow walked it. | ||
| If you're watching Alex today, you heard the way you know he described it from insiders who are actually in the courtroom saying it was weird. | ||
| It was like the prosecution was playing defense. | ||
| They were making arguments in a way where it seemed like they didn't want the guy indicted, which is probably true. | ||
| But he had no, you know, direct connection to James Comey. | ||
| There was no obvious uh collusion or or conflict of interest. | ||
| But what it turned out was that this guy's wife, her dad is godfather to James Comey's daughter. | ||
| So I think if this was a direct family connection, it probably would have been found out pretty quickly, because it would have been obvious. | ||
| He would have had the last name Comey or something. | ||
| But because it was the godfather, which is, you know, it means they're extremely close, extremely close to be the godfather of your child, and obviously have been for decades because his daughter is like 40 years old at this point. | ||
| So Eric Siebert, they say the uh left media, far left media complained that the president of the pre about the president's firing of Siebert was outrageous and only done because Seabird wouldn't prosecute radical Letitia James for her multiple instances of mortgage fraud. | ||
| What the legacy media won't tell you is that President Trump had every reason for firing Siebert. | ||
| Eric Siebert, the U.S. attorney fired by Trump, had prepared a 51-page memo outlining why Jim Comey should not be charged for crimes he committed while at the FBI. | ||
| However, Seabird did not disclose that his father-in-law, his wife's father, is the godfather to Comey's daughter. | ||
| A stunning conflict of interest. | ||
| Siebert would have had to recuse himself, but he never admitted it. | ||
| And it was only, you know, exposed very, very recently. | ||
| And five days before the expiration of the statute of limitations, Donald Trump fires him and replaces him with somebody who, against all odds, is able to get this indictment through. | ||
| Which is absolutely incredible. | ||
| So I don't know. | ||
| I I think maybe Siebert should be next. | ||
| Maybe he should be the next indictment for concealing this and hiding this and trying to, you know, manage this affair. | ||
| And this is the exactly the way that it works, right? | ||
| They go, well, you know, Donald Trump really has his knives out for James Comey, you know, because of all of the crimes, because of all of the crimes that James Comey was engaged in and helped to commit or cover up or told somebody else to commit, you know, all of those crimes that he committed. | ||
| You know, Donald Trump is really got it out for James Comey. | ||
| And, you know, he's gonna try. | ||
| So instead of trying to stop him from indicting, instead of trying to, you know, distract him or or get him away from this course of action, we're gonna let him think that we're fulfilling his course of action. | ||
| We're gonna let him think that we're working to indict James Comey, but the whole time, the guy who's in charge of getting the indictment is in fact close family friends with the Comeys and is likely in communications with them. | ||
| And James Comey probably is, you know, sitting pretty on, you know, some beach somewhere, thinking, I got nothing to worry about. | ||
| My my old friend Eric, my friend's son Eric is gonna take care of it for me and is doing everything he can to keep me safe. | ||
| But sure, it'll, but it'll look an awful lot like they tried really hard to get the indictment, because then it's like it then it's even better. | ||
| I mean, if you can just stop the indictment from ever even putting being put forward, if you stop the indictment the grand juries from being summoned, then you know, there's always this question hanging in the air. | ||
| But if they try to get the indictment and they hold grand juries, and it comes back with nothing, or the prosecutors refuse to prosecute, then you can say, hey, look, pfft, we tried and and it doesn't work. | ||
| You know, we tried to get the indictment. | ||
| Turns out there's nothing there. | ||
| Looks like James Comey's an innocent man, and you you can't investigate him anymore. | ||
| Wouldn't that have been a brilliant way to handle this for the Comey's, but it didn't work out that way. | ||
| It almost did. | ||
| We're five days away from that working out. | ||
| From it from the statute of limitations expiring, the indictment going nowhere, the grand jury failing to yield any results, and nothing really happening. | ||
| Yeah, Troy Edwards, James Comey's son-in-law, steps down from U.S. Attorney's Office in Eastern Virginia immediately following Comey's indictment. | ||
| And it is, it is very weird how these families just truly do hold like all of the power in our country. | ||
| And it just it's like it's so unnatural and it's so obviously rigged. | ||
| There's absolutely no reason why James Comey's daughter should be trying the P. Diddy trial and the Epstein trial, and his son-in-law is doing this other thing, and a friend of the family is this other thing. | ||
| And it's like, okay, all of these people, all in the same social networks, all in the same family groups, happen to have all of these important positions, happen to get all of these cases. | ||
| No, we are operating under a monolithic conspiracy that is working to cover up for itself. | ||
| And just like they came out, you know, with the uh James O'Keefe video talking about the whole Epstein cover-up was to protect the Clintons. | ||
| Well, you know, Clinton's and the Comeys are like two peas in a pot, right? | ||
| It was James Comey that came out and covered up for Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Did you know very much the same thing that his, you know, uh God his uh his daughter's godfather's son had tried to do for him, where they went, yeah, he committed crimes, but it's you know, for the best interest of the country. | ||
| We better not try this. | ||
| And he may have done things that were illegal, but we can't prove that he meant to. | ||
| So, oh gosh, I guess we can't do anything. | ||
| He tried to do for James Comey the same thing that James Comey did for Hillary Clinton. | ||
| And remember, we weren't supposed to find any of this out because they thought from the beginning that Hillary Clinton would have gotten to office in 2016. | ||
| She can run the cover-up, all their malfeasance during crossfire hurricane would have not only never been exposed, but it actually would have continued. | ||
| And they would have, you know, actually eventually fabricated some sort of evidence to try Trump on, frame him as a Russian agent and throw him in jail and start the process that they started anyway under Joe Biden of rounding up right wingers. | ||
| Only we forced them to, you know, stage January 6th first, which itself was, you know, a there were a lot of things that went into that, including the mail in ballots, the stolen election, which all came about because of the virus they released on purpose. | ||
| Did I mention that there's a monolithic conspiracy running the United States, and it is diametrically opposed to the people of the United States because that is what's being exposed right now. | ||
| And hopefully these people uh will be rounded up and will, you know, turn on each other, and we can just round up the whole network. | ||
| It would be very convenient. | ||
| And we've got other a lot of other things moving in that direction as well. | ||
| But sticking on the Comey topic for now. | ||
| This is what Donald Trump truthed out earlier today. | ||
| This is his post on Truth Social. | ||
| Whether you like corrupt James Comey or not, and I can't imagine too many people liking him, he lied. | ||
| It's not a complex lie, it's very simple, but important one. | ||
| There's no way he can explain his way out of it. | ||
| He's a dirty cop, always has been, but he was just assigned to a crooked Joe, appointed judge, so he's off to a very good start. | ||
| Nevertheless, words are words, and he wasn't hedging or in dispute. | ||
| He was very positive. | ||
| There was no doubt in his mind about what he said or what he meant by saying it. | ||
| He left himself zero margin of error on a big and important answer to a question. | ||
| He just got unexpectedly caught. | ||
| James Dirty Cop Comey was a destroyer of lives. | ||
| He knew exactly what he was saying, and that was a very serious and far reaching lie for which a very big price must be paid. | ||
| President Donald J. Trump. | ||
| So he signed it himself there. | ||
| And it was, you know, it was just patently obvious. | ||
| He he very uh flagrantly lied, really about a number of things, but so did Chris Ray, and that's been coming out, so maybe he'll me next on the list too. | ||
| But so did John Brennan, and so did James Clapper, and So did uh all of them, Peter Strck as well. | ||
| Again, justice has been a long time coming, but it needs to arrive at a certain point. | ||
| I mean, we can't just uh let these people get away with it. | ||
| And so this appears to be a good first step in that direction. | ||
| Everybody's on the left is freaking out, of course. | ||
| But remember, I want to remind you, I should have grabbed this clip. | ||
| I want to remind you, the left doesn't believe anything. | ||
| They don't know anything, they don't believe anything, they don't have morals or standards or anything. | ||
| Loyalty, it doesn't exist for them. | ||
| Do you remember when Donald Trump fired James Comey and uh Stephen Colbert announced that, and everybody in the audience cheered because they thought they were supposed to hate Comey, and they thought they're supposed to be happy that he was fired, and Colbert had to scold them and say, no, no, you're against this. | ||
| No, this is bad. | ||
| You're supposed to think this is overreach and tyranny. | ||
| And they all got the message, went, oh, right, right. | ||
| Yeah, sorry, no, Trump is terrible. | ||
| Oh, James Comey, we love that guy. | ||
| These people are soulless. | ||
| They're empty, they're vessels, okay, filled up by Satan. | ||
| So we don't have to actually concern ourselves with what they say, but we will look at it. | ||
| We will interest ourselves in it. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 39 here. | ||
| First, you'll hear what this guy was saying about Trump before uh James Comey was indicted, and then we'll hear him express his feelings about what's happening with James Comey. | ||
| And I think you'll notice a uh slight difference here. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| He is being treated no better or worse than anyone else. | ||
| This is not selective prosecution. | ||
| That this is not somebody who's singled out, that he's being treated just like anyone else. | ||
| That is what it means to have a rule of law. | ||
| That is what the Justice Department is really singing and messaging here is that everyone will be treated as Merrick Garland has said, as you know, equally in this country. | ||
| This is really a really a great day for America. | ||
| This is such a horrendous moment for the rule of law, for the Department of Justice, for the country at large being singled out for impermissible reasons. | ||
| Um, and so just because you did your job, but just because you referred uh the president uh or you opened an investigation into the president. | ||
| Um, those are not legitimate reasons to have a sort of tit for tat vindictive prosecution. | ||
| This looks like it. | ||
| The Emperor has no clothes that this is this is the abuse that it appears to be. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| This is the abuse that it appears to be. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| So when it's Donald Trump, now the question is what was he even talking about when it came to Donald Trump there? | ||
| He, you know, in the beginning, he's sitting there going, This is not political. | ||
| This is just, you know, this is Merrick Garland, you know, uh symbol of honor and integrity, simply pursuing the truth. | ||
| And Donald Trump happened to be on the wrong side of that truth, and gosh darn it, nobody's above the law. | ||
| And doesn't he sound so sincere when he says it? | ||
| Doesn't it sound like he truly believes what he says? | ||
| Then when it comes to James Comey, it is just the absolute inverse. | ||
| Now, there's a an extra layer to this because you might be thinking, well, isn't this just the way you guys are doing? | ||
| You said this one thing about Trump, and now that's happening to Comey, you're changing your tune. | ||
| Okay, I get that. | ||
| That would be a good argument if we lived in a subjective world of delusion. | ||
| We live in the real world with objective truth. | ||
| So I ask again, what was he even talking about Trump doing? | ||
| What was the crime Trump committed again? | ||
| Uh what was the crime Trump committed again? | ||
| What did he do? | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Was this about the loan that he paid off that they decided was a multiple felony uh charge? | ||
| Was this about some uh Stormy Daniels thing where somebody wrote a check that Trump paid him back for? | ||
| What was that crime again? | ||
| What was this about the Jack Smith uh attack dog? | ||
| Just get Trump on whatever you can, go after him for the phone call to Georgia, call him, you know, go after him for documents that he may or may not even have, raid Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| Uh, was it that charge? | ||
| Was it I mean, I can't even remember the number of things that uh they've tried to stick on Trump. | ||
| None of them were crimes, first of all, but most of them weren't even crimes. | ||
| None of them Were the type of thing that anybody would ever be charged for, you know, like the paying off Stormy Daniels and the charge that Trump was saddled with was exactly the same charge that Hillary Clinton was under four years before, and she literally did not her campaign paid off a like $50,000 fine, and that was it. | ||
| Didn't even make headlines. | ||
| This isn't a matter of, well, you know, it's a difference of opinion. | ||
| No, no. | ||
| There's factual reality, and the factual reality is Donald Trump never committed crimes. | ||
| He pissed off the people in power, and they went after him with everything they've got, and they tried to get him on whatever they could fabricate. | ||
| And it was all fraudulent and it was all bull crap. | ||
| And it was obvious from the very beginning. | ||
| James Comey, on the other hand, one, was one of the people engaged in that very process of weaponizing the government against Donald Trump and was caught lying, just verbatim, black and white. | ||
| There's no speculation or interpretation necessary. | ||
| He lied. | ||
| He lied. | ||
| Now, Roger Stone, they tried to throw him to jail for years. | ||
| They raided his house at 4 a.m. with the CNN crew standing by to capture the whole event for doing exactly the same thing. | ||
| Only in that case, it was also not really a lie. | ||
| You know, James Comey sat there and was asked a yes or no question, answered yes when he knew the answer was no. | ||
| That was a lie. | ||
| With Roger Stone, it was like he misremembered something, and we don't even know. | ||
| I don't even remember what it was that they were acting like he was lying about. | ||
| Like he did he didn't have an email address of somebody at WikiLeaks or just something stupid that I don't even think they proved. | ||
| But it doesn't matter. | ||
| It doesn't matter. | ||
| Nothing that they, none of the charges they've laid on anybody on the right wing have had any validity. | ||
| And it's not just Trump, and it's not just Roger Stone, and it's not just Owen Schreuer and Alex Jones, Ox didn't go to jail, but the assault that we've been under legally. | ||
| It's Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| It's every lawyer Trump's ever had. | ||
| It's Steve Bannon. | ||
| It's, I mean, so many people have been charged and persecuted by the Biden administration. | ||
| It's frankly hilarious they think that their arguments have any weights as if this is some sort of unprecedented thing that it's it's here. | ||
| The tyranny is here. | ||
| When they were justifying abject tyranny four years ago, and that is what it was. | ||
| Unlike this case, in which this is just literally a guy getting caught lying to Congress and now being charged for it. | ||
| There's a big difference between these two groups. | ||
| Now, Rudy Giuliani himself has said that this indictment could just be sort of a shot across the bow, a uh a sighting in tracer shot for a much larger RICO case that could follow. | ||
| Clip 33. | ||
| Here's Rudy Giuliani earlier today. | ||
| The indictment uh is a giveaway in uh the history of indictments. | ||
| I think I know him pretty well. | ||
| You see how short it is? | ||
| So you might think as a defendant, I get a little short indictment like that. | ||
| That's terrific. | ||
| That's if he committed one crime once. | ||
| That is a uh preface, not even an introduction, to the major war and peace novel that the indictment will become. | ||
| Um they're beginning with him, maybe because of the time pressure. | ||
| I mean, she ha uh she can't be immune to the fact that there's pressure on her. | ||
| I might think it's unfair because I'm a prosecutor, and I don't know what good it is to push prosecutors, but uh this is this definitely is a result of the press the president pushing her a little. | ||
| And it's a good indictment. | ||
| Don't get me wrong. | ||
| It's a good case, but it's rather small in the big scheme of things. | ||
| You've got a case that could be three times as broad as the original Biden Rico case that I outlined in my book. | ||
| It could be that case plus two others all in one RICO case. | ||
| Think of Rico as a novel with seven or eight chapters. | ||
| Each chapter a different crime, different predicates, and a different uh uh set of penalties. | ||
| Plus, here's the benefit of RICO, Steve. | ||
| You can take the money away. | ||
| So if you want to, if you want to defuse some of these, let's say, oh, hypothetically, let's say that people were funding Antifa, Black Lives Matter, to do those riots. | ||
| You could bankrupt those operations. | ||
| You could you could take their present accounts, and then you could spend the next 10 years tracing all their accounts and taking everything else. | ||
| Uh case in point, the Teamsters. | ||
| Joe Denever, your friend and I did that to the Teamsters. | ||
| We spent 10 Years went on after me, after him, and we took all their money out of the Central States pension fund, which took all of their money out of Las Vegas, which took all their money away from them, which is why they're a pathetic, silly group of old men now and wannabes. | ||
| I love Ruby Giuliani. | ||
| I still have questions about Rudy Giuliani because of 9-11, but it's like this guy literally took down the New York mom when he was a young prosecutor. | ||
| He is like a historical legendary figure, and he's doing it again. | ||
| He's a part of the team that is taking down the mob that has occupied our government for the last several decades. | ||
| This is monumental and historic stuff, folks, and I'm I'm happy to be alive while it's happening. | ||
| We'll be right back with more. | ||
| It gets crazier, trust me. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Again, we're talking about the indictment of James Comey. | ||
| And I'm having I'm having a little bit of a hard time just kind of wrapping my head around how to how to explain this timeline because there's so many the the cause and effect gets sort of mixed up a little bit. | ||
| But essentially it's a I mean, it's no matter no matter how deeply or or shallowly you you look into this, it is a tale of unending corruption, and they are really brilliant in how they do it. | ||
| And I guess I mean brilliance might not be the right word, but when you're in a position of power like these people, when you are the authority, when you're the one who dictates to the media what the truth is, and they run with whatever you say as if it's you know God's gospel, you can, you know, you get a lot of leeway with how you can work, which is why I've been advocating for kind of using these types of tactics against them. | ||
| And I think I'll you'll understand what I mean when I explain it. | ||
| But you have this sort of series of they abuse their position, they do things that are either illegal or semi-illegal, certainly an abuse of power, certainly not, you know, for the best for everybody. | ||
| It's you know, they're not acting in the interest of the nation, they're acting in their own corrupt interest. | ||
| And then when that gets called out, or they get caught doing that, or when Donald Trump tries to use his authority as president to stop them from doing that, then they go, ha ha, we got you. | ||
| Now you're obstructing justice. | ||
| And so it's like anything, you know, they do something, they attack, any response, they then treat as some sort of violation, some sort of trespass that then gives them the right to go even farther down the line, which again is what I've been advocating for when it comes to the far left, the leftist writers, | ||
| the ice agents, whatever, is like they open themselves up to this type of sort of tit for tat, where you know, you declare them domestic terrorists, and then anybody supporting them is like, all right, well, now you're on the list, or okay, now it's a RICO charge. | ||
| Now we expand it out even further. | ||
| We need to be, you know, looking at the way the deep state operates, and not spiritually, but tactically adopting some of their methods. | ||
| And I really hope they do that. | ||
| For example, this attorney, Seabert, who was slow walking the whole thing and was trying desperately to stop justice from being brought. | ||
| I think he should face charges. | ||
| I mean, I think he was not operating in good faith. | ||
| I think he violated his oath. | ||
| I think it was it's pretty obvious he was at least like, I don't know, I have no evidence of collusion, but they were obviously very, very close to the Comeys. | ||
| He obviously is very, very tied into them with his family. | ||
| So it's not a but not a major stretch to think that, yeah, he was undermining and subverting the judicial process in America to cover up for his friend James Comey. | ||
| Is he gonna get away with that? | ||
| We wouldn't if we did what he did. | ||
| These would be additional charges on top of everything else. | ||
| Again, they charged Trump's lawyers for defending him. | ||
| I'm not even saying we have to go that far. | ||
| That is actually genuinely the death of the legal system. | ||
| So that's the type of thing that we're actually doing this because of. | ||
| And you know, Alex put it really well today. | ||
| And I wish I could, I wish I could just, you know, which I had his uh transcript here. | ||
| Because as obvious as this is, I almost have have trouble getting across the real impetus, the real meat of of what's actually happening here, because what Trump is doing is in absolute, absolutely no way authoritarian, tyrannical, abuse of power. | ||
| Everything that happened between 2015 and 2024 and even beyond, really, was a it was an egregious, an egregious abuse of power by the Democrats, by James Comey, by the deep state cabal. | ||
| They tried to overthrow this country. | ||
| They tried to perform multiple coups against Donald Trump. | ||
| And this involves Russia. | ||
| It involves Ukraine. | ||
| It involves the crossfire hurricane thing. | ||
| It involves the impeachment. | ||
| It involves COVID-19 and the scam that that was. | ||
| And January 6th. | ||
| And the Mel and Bow. | ||
| They worked so hard to keep Trump out of office. | ||
| No, we defeated them, and we need to make something of that. | ||
| We need to actually do something to stop the onslaught of tyranny. | ||
| And I'll show you more. | ||
| I'll stop talking. | ||
| I got more videos to go to, and I want to read this article. | ||
| But we've got more videos today. | ||
| Richard Blumenthal this time. | ||
| Again, saying that when Democrats get back in power, they're firing up the lawfare engines again, and they're going full bore. | ||
| And you know, you thought it was bad last time that they went completely insane and threw a bunch of innocent people in jail for decades. | ||
| Oh, it's gonna that's gonna look like a cakewalk compared to what they're gonna do next. | ||
| So they're telling us, yes, they were tyrannical. | ||
| They're out of power for this, you know, interregnum, but when they get back, oh, they're gonna fire those engines up again. | ||
| So what Trump is doing right now, they have to portray as authoritarianism because they don't want it to happen to them. | ||
| And it's just it's just as simple as that. | ||
| It is literally as simple as that. | ||
| These are the communist revolutionaries, these are the Jacobins, these are the psychotic tyrants that tried to destroy our system. | ||
| We stopped them. | ||
| Now it's time for them to pay the price so that they can never do it again. | ||
| This is an existential problem for our country. | ||
| And the people, and again, I it's like we'll get into the ICE facilities being attacked. | ||
| We'll get into the FBI in January 6th. | ||
| But they all involve the same issue, which is the bad guys never get punished. | ||
| The bad guys never get dealt with. | ||
| So not only are they still in office or still out there, able to continue their nefarious operations, but more people come after them and see them and learn the lesson. | ||
| Oh, I as long as I'm on that team, I can do whatever the hell I want. | ||
| And it it it like includes the people like the guy we just played going on on MSNBC. | ||
| When it's Trump, it's uh this is the rule of law, and nobody is above the law, and I have full faith in our justice system. | ||
| But then when it's Comey, it's oh my God, this is authoritarianism, this is awful. | ||
| These people are lying to you. | ||
| They are in on it, they are part of the conspiracy because the conspiracy could never work if you didn't have spin doctors like that lying to the American people to deceive them into uh um complacency. | ||
| There's a CNN article that's actually very interesting. | ||
| Of course, it's completely biased, but it tells a good story. | ||
| Inside the seven tumultuous days that led to the James Comey indictment. | ||
| Now, even from the beginning, even from the jump, like let me stop you right there, CNN. | ||
| Okay, what this should be telling us is the nine-month story that ended with seven days of you know intense action, but this wasn't a week ago, Trump going, hey, go indict James Comey, and then for seven days, that guy's running around indicting. | ||
| What actually happened here is that James Comey's good family friend, you know, his daughter's godfather's son, or whatever the connection is, excuse me, covered up and tried to slow walk the indictment for nine full months, and then in seven days, Trump was able to turn it all around. | ||
| And so I want to get into uh exactly what that story entails. | ||
| But um, let me go first to this video of uh clip number 20 here. | ||
| This is John Solomon. | ||
| Again, we played this in the first five, but it's worth listening again to what he said, how this came about, and what exactly uh you know James Comey has waiting for him in the courtroom. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
| Well, listen, uh, the key testimony against James Comey is gonna come from his inner circle. | ||
| One of the people that he trusted and ran the FBI alongside of will be the key witness saying, No, he authorized me to uh leak information, contrary to what he testified to Congress. | ||
| That's gonna be a difficult case for James Cole McCabe. | ||
| I just want to step back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Well, it could be McCabe. | ||
| It could be uh uh uh Daniel Richie, it could be James Baker. | ||
| I keep an eye on James Baker. | ||
| Remember the documents we had on your show a couple weeks ago. | ||
| All three of those are in uh position to testify they were authorized to leak. | ||
| We'll see which. | ||
| And these are of course the names that uh InfoWars has been telling you about the entire time. | ||
| And hopefully there's some, you know, pressure being uh leveled against them on January 6th. | ||
| That's how they got a lot of people to flip is hey, you can either work with us and you know, you'll serve a couple years, or you're getting the terrorism enhancement, you're gonna be going away for the rest of your life. | ||
| And that is the deal these guys should face, because in all justice, they do deserve life in prison, what they've done to this country, what they've allowed to happen to our unity. | ||
| I mean, it's incalculable the damage they've done, even just warping people's minds to convincing them that they're that Trump is a Russian agent. | ||
| Like I've said a million times. | ||
| When you're trying to debunk a lie about Donald Trump, it's not just that lie you're trying to debunk. | ||
| You're usually arguing with somebody who has layer upon layer upon layer upon layer of lies that they believe. | ||
| So I remember having a conversation after January 6th and trying to go, hey, there was it was not a violent crowd. | ||
| It was a peaceful crowd. | ||
| The police attacked. | ||
| They fired flashbangs deep into the crowd, forcing people forward into the line of cops who are beating people with batons. | ||
| This wasn't the Trump supporters rioting, coming, you know, that none of them brought weapons. | ||
| You would think, you'd think Trump supporters, if they wanted to overthrow the government, you'd think they'd be, you know, armed to the teeth and able to do it, but that was never the intention. | ||
| That's obvious. | ||
| Anyway, I'm arguing about this. | ||
| And the guy I'm arguing with is like, well, but you remember in the campaign Trump would uh have his people beaten up protesters and stuff, and it's like, oh my God. | ||
| That first of all, that never happened. | ||
| Okay, but this is I'm having this argument in 2020, 2021. | ||
| It would have been 2021. | ||
| And I'm having to try to debunk things from 2016 because it's that that's informing the belief of January 6th. | ||
| Because when they say Donald Trump supporters committed violence at the behest of Donald Trump, that perfectly fits in line with the illusion that they've been sold. | ||
| That this is this is what Trump does. | ||
| He always does this. | ||
| He calls for violence. | ||
| And this goes all the way back to the clips from 2016, where it was violent mobs of Antifa viciously attacking Trump supporters, and Trump saying, hey, don't put up with this. | ||
| We're not gonna let people come in and, you know, disrupt our rally, and then we're gonna like ask them nicely to leave. | ||
| No, we're gonna grab them and chuck them out on the street. | ||
| Oh, oh my God, Trump is calling for violence. | ||
| He's literally responding to violence. | ||
| It's been the same thing over and over for the last 10 years at this point. | ||
| These people still don't get it. | ||
| They still are stuck in this half-baked delusion where they only ever see Trump's actions. | ||
| They can never see for some reason the mobs of violent rioters attacking Trump family, you know, Trump supporter families. | ||
| Uh, you know, men and women with their children being bombarded with eggs and you know, uh left bloody on the ground after one of these riots. | ||
| They never happen to see that. | ||
| Somehow they completely miss all of Crossfire Hurricane being an utter fraud. | ||
| They didn't notice that for some reason, but they're very concerned at what's happening to James Comey. | ||
| I don't know how to explain. | ||
| I don't know how to get through to these people. | ||
| I guess that's our our big challenge at this point, or just in fact, let's ignore that challenge. | ||
| Let's just defeat them, crush them, silence them in whatever legal way we can because they're unrepentant liars. | ||
| And so when these people go on MSNBC and they say uh this is outrageous, this is authoritarianism, when four years ago they were saying Donald Trump is just he's he's the target of this because he's the one that broke the law, and we're all, you know, nobody's above the law, and Merrick Garland has my full trust. | ||
| They are now contributing to this atmosphere of uh chaos and fraction fractiousness that is uh tearing us part from the inside. | ||
| That's uh that's a whole that's a whole side story, though. | ||
| Just just understand like the there's so many different facets to the monster that we're fighting, so many different heads of the hydra, the media uh, you know, landscape that allows for the dissemination of these lies, the deep state operators that are out front like James Comey, but they've got a whole team of people in the background, family members, friends of family members, a whole network of people in power still, but working at the behest of the disgraced former FBI uh head. | ||
| I I mean it just it goes so deep and it's so fetid and rotten at the center. | ||
| This is why we've been not just calling for indictments, but like demanding that we slam the gas pedal and get them done now because we got a hell of a lot of justice to achieve in a very short amount of time. | ||
| So it goes on, this uh seven-day saga of James Comey. | ||
| Uh President Trump's former personal lawyer, Lindsay Halligan, had been on the job for just four days as U.S. attorney when she stood in front of a grand jury seeking an extraordinary and unprecedented indictment of former FBI director James Comey. | ||
| They say the Alexandria, Virginia grand jury ultimately approved the indictment, charging Comey with two counts. | ||
| The other false uh statements charge was rejected, propelling the United States into a new phase that Trump's critics warn amounts to a breach of democratic values and a dangerous lurch towards authoritarianism. | ||
| Like this is the type of thing. | ||
| Do people have the reading comprehension to understand? | ||
| Y'all remember when I in Texas they're called the toss tests, but the state test, they always have a reading comprehension section, and they always ask the style of question that says they'll give you a paragraph and they'll go, which sentence is superfluous, which sentence can be removed. | ||
| And you're supposed to sort of edit, and there'll be a, you know, several sentences about a construction site, and like halfway through will be a sentence that's like, and the the sky was stormy that day. | ||
| And it's like, okay, well, that doesn't contribute anything. | ||
| It's not about whatever. | ||
| I hope people remember that. | ||
| You should be doing that with every article you read, because as you read this, there are facts, and then there is extemporaneous extra superfluous nonsense that's only there to guide your interpretation of the facts they previously laid down. | ||
| The Alexandria, Virginia grand jury ultimately improved an indictment, charging Comey with two counts. | ||
| The other false statements charges were rejected. | ||
| That's where it should stop. | ||
| These are the facts that have been told. | ||
| All of the rest of this propelling the United States into a new phase that Trump's Trump's critics warned could Trump's critics. | ||
| See that? | ||
| See, okay, so a bunch of uh, you know, dumbass communists that themselves are the ones now receiving the justice they've been trying to avoid. | ||
| Yeah, obviously they're gonna claim it's something. | ||
| They're gonna claim it's some sort of malfeasance to get away with the crimes they committed. | ||
| So let's not listen to the criminals. | ||
| Let's not include the statements of the criminals in the article about the criminals, and let's just uh remove that entire sentence because it literally doesn't add anything. | ||
| It doesn't add anything for one thing, because it's the criminals just trying to get away with it, obviously, on the face of it, but also it's a lie on the face of it as well, considering the fact that this is only coming after years upon years upon years of the obvious and egregious politization of the DOJ, the political persecution being wielded by the United States Department of Justice. | ||
| So spare us CNN, and I just it just I shudder to think of your average American out there reading this and just absorbing it like a sponge without any critical thought whatsoever. | ||
| Not even noticing that like they have a, you know, the first sentence is a fact, and then the second sentence is an attempt to discredit the fact they just told you to try to frame it in your mind as if this is some sort of horrible, you know, uh breaking of precedence, despite the fact that they tried to send Trump for jail for 400 years for paying off a loan that he took. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| The federal charges against Comey marked the culmination of seven days worth of chaos inside the Justice Department in the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Eastern District of Virginia, which had three different officials in charge of the office in the past week. | ||
| Think about this. | ||
| This has all been happening behind the scenes. | ||
| That for nine months, this guy Sebrick or whatever his name is, was slow walking these indictments, was writing letters going, gee, I really don't think we should go after uh my good friend Jim. | ||
| I mean, I mean uh former FBI director James Comey for seven months, and then a week before the deadline, the hard line, you know, dead zone where they cannot charge after five years. | ||
| They put somebody in who's never tried a case, who's Trump's personal lawyer. | ||
| Like he had to go with the only person that he could actually trust to do this, and she pulled it off. | ||
| She pulled it off in four days. | ||
| They'd been trying for nine months, like that alone is evidence of the malfeasance of the people before them. | ||
| She got an indictment in four days, and they spent nine months. | ||
| She's a total amateur who's never Done this before and is Trump's personal lawyer. | ||
| These people are supposed to be the DOJ experts whose job it is to do this. | ||
| Yeah, that's evidence of criminality, in my opinion. | ||
| That's evidence of collusion or corruption of some sort. | ||
| Or, I mean, unless you're gonna try to convince me that you can have that level of in in uh competence in the federal government. | ||
| I don't believe it. | ||
| The federal charges against Comey marked the culmination of seven days worth of chaos. | ||
| It was the okay, so now this is where it gets really convoluted. | ||
| This is where the detangled web is weaved. | ||
| It was in it was the 2017 firing of Comey that prompted the appointment of special counsel Robert Moeller to investigate possible Trump campaign connections to Russia and obstruction of justice. | ||
| To Trump's dismay, the first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, recused himself from that case, and senior DOG uh DOJ leaders at the White House uh and the White House officials kept the president at arm's length from interfering in the in the probe. | ||
| Okay, so now you'll notice that they start sort of halfway through or like at the end of the actual timeline. | ||
| And then they sort of go back to what initially started the first. | ||
| So the next paragraph. | ||
| It was Comey's 2017 dinner with Trump when the president asked Comey to let go of the investigation into his first national security advisor, Michael Flynn, which became a key component of Moeller's investigation that found Trump likely obstructed justice, but couldn't be charged because he was president. | ||
| The president demanded an ouster of the U.S. attorney who would not uh bring forward a case. | ||
| So what the actual timeline is Michael Flynn is appointed by Trump. | ||
| Michael Flynn is in the White House. | ||
| James Comey deliberately sends FBI agents clandestinely into the White House, knowing that he is subverting or you know, uh circum uh he's going around, whatever the word is, he's going around the typical process that's followed because he's trying to screw Michael Flynn over. | ||
| He's trying to get him to say something that he can then frame as lying to investigators in order to get him fired. | ||
| And he admits it in public, folks. | ||
| I don't know if you've seen this video. | ||
| It's a video I just asked the crew to grab. | ||
| Let's go to it now. | ||
| Here's James Comey admitting and kind of laughing at the fact that he set up and entrapped General Flynn, which kickstarted this whole saga, and then I'll connect the dots after that. | ||
| But this was the inciting incident. | ||
| Trump had just got elected. | ||
| He's working in good faith with the FBI, who he thinks is on his side. | ||
| He thinks this is a Republican guy, James Comey. | ||
| I can trust him. | ||
| He's coming into the office. | ||
| He's like, I just was swept in on this amazing, miraculous 2016 election. | ||
| He goes, and remember the first thing he did. | ||
| The first thing he did when he became president was he went to the CIA and he said, guys, I'm your boss now. | ||
| You work for me. | ||
| Let's work together. | ||
| He really tried to send that signal. | ||
| So Donald Trump gets into office, thinks these people are working with him, thinks I'm the president now. | ||
| These people are gonna help me out, they're gonna help they care for the country, so they're gonna help me care for the country. | ||
| He's not going after Hillary Clinton, he dropped all that. | ||
| That was campaign rhetoric, but now it's time to get to get down to business. | ||
| He gets into office, and this is what James Comey does to him and Michael Flynn. | ||
| Let's watch. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You look at this White House now, and it's hard to imagine two FBI agents ending up in the same room. | |
| How did that happen? | ||
| I sent them. | ||
| Something we I probably wouldn't have done or maybe gotten away with in a more organized investigation, a more organized administration in the George W. Bush administration, for example, or the Obama administration, the protocol, two men that all of us have perhaps increased appreciation for uh over the last two years. | ||
| Yeah, they only murdered a million people, spent three trillion dollars in wars. | ||
| So if the FBI destroyed our personal liberties into the White House itself to interview a senior official, you would work through the White House counsel and there'd be discussions and approvals and who would be there. | ||
| And I thought it's early enough. | ||
| Let's just send a couple guys over. | ||
| Can you imagine? | ||
| These are the snakes that were surrounding Trump from the very being. | ||
| He wasn't even in office yet. | ||
| He wasn't even in office yet. | ||
| They're moving into the White House. | ||
| Uh, you know, I'm I'm sure you know General Flynn got a call. | ||
| Hey, you know, uh, we got some FBI agents we want to send over. | ||
| Do you mind if we come by? | ||
| And he's like, Yeah, sure, of course, come on over. | ||
| Thinking they're friendly, thinking we're all on the same team here, they're gonna come help me out, not knowing that the whole time James Comey is deliberately sent them over to try to trick him and entrap him into accidentally saying something that's not true, so they can then frame him as lying to uh federal agents and charge him with a crime. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Just treason. | |
| That's just treason outright. | ||
| And he's admitting it. | ||
| He's like laughing at it. | ||
| And he's like, I wouldn't have gotten away with this with people who knew what was going on, but Trump didn't know what was going on. | ||
| Yeah, and he wanted and he thought you were helping him. | ||
| And he thought I'm the president of the United States. | ||
| The people's will put me in office. | ||
| Look, the FBI wants to send people over to help. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great. | |
| Come on over, not knowing that he was being sent a, you know, a viper, venomous snakes there to kill him, basically. | ||
| So this is the timeline. | ||
| Like, get this. | ||
| Donald Trump, General Mike Flynn have done nothing wrong. | ||
| No crimes been committed. | ||
| No accusations have been even been made. | ||
| But F but the FBI sends two agents to entrap General Flynn. | ||
| It succeeds. | ||
| Donald Trump, again, brand new in this office, thinks there's, you know, there's just like it's the first scandal before he's even uh you know sworn in. | ||
| He's like, I just, you know, it's not worth it. | ||
| I got so much going on. | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| He tosses Mike Flynn to the side, which in retrospect he shouldn't have. | ||
| But at the time, again, he's operating in good faith. | ||
| He's like, oh my God, this guy lied to the F. This is trouble. | ||
| Okay, let's just get him out because I'm trying to try to be a president here. | ||
| So he he, you know, sidelines Mike Flynn. | ||
| But then he's having dinner with James Comey and he's like, hey, I it seems like this Mike Flynn thing wasn't legit. | ||
| Can you drop it? | ||
| Which obviously it wasn't. | ||
| James Comey admits, no, it wasn't legit. | ||
| They entrapped him. | ||
| They literally entrapped the guy. | ||
| Trump has dinner with him and goes, I, you know, can you drop this case? | ||
| James Comey's sitting there going, ha, got him. | ||
| I now got Trump. | ||
| Now I've got Trump. | ||
| Because I set up General Flynn. | ||
| Now that Trump is asking me to drop the case, the fraudulent case against him. | ||
| Now I'm gonna claim that's obstruction of justice. | ||
| That's obstruction of justice. | ||
| And then when Trump responds to that and goes, you know what, Comey, you're fired. | ||
| That's when Robert Moeller gets uh put in place. | ||
| And they investigate everything about Donald Trump, thinking again that they'll be able to get his tax records and you know communications, and surely they'll find something. | ||
| It never came to anything because he's operated such a clean operation for so for so long. | ||
| And and even in that case, you know, Donald Trump is like he's got Robert Mueller investigating him because James Comey calls it obstruction of justice for Trump to ask him to drop the case that James Comey entrapped Michael Flynn into. | ||
| So they commit a crime, they entrap somebody, and then any attempt for Trump to just get you know get things back on the track on track and set things right, they then use to double down on it and you know, charge him with obstruction and get Robert Mueller appointed. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, to the war room. | ||
| Second hour is on, and I just went through that whole hour without even without even mentioning the Alex Jones Store.com, which is first of all, uh just stupid of me because we won't be on air if you don't support us. | ||
| But also, it's bad for you because I didn't even tell you that the methylene blue is buy one, get one free this weekend only, buy any bottle of methylene blue, either capsules or tincture, and get another bottle free. | ||
| And of course, it supports everything we do here. | ||
| A true 360 win. | ||
| Uh, and so it's buy one, get one with probably our best-selling product on the site, the Alex Jones store.com. | ||
| Go there today, support us, and we thank you for doing that. | ||
| Now, I'm so happy to welcome my guest, Jay Dyer. | ||
| He is an author, comedian, TV presenter, known for his deep analysis of Hollywood, geopolitics and culture. | ||
| His graduate work focused on psychological warfare and film, and he's the author of two books, Esoteric Hollywood one and two, and the co-creator and co-host of the television show Hollow Hollywood Decoded. | ||
| He's been featured on numerous popular shows and podcasts and in debates with some of the world's top debaters. | ||
| You can uh follow him at Jay Dyer on YouTube, Jaysanalysis.com. | ||
| And I don't know, I this might be an out-of-date uh bio. | ||
| Because I are you working on a third? | ||
| I think you're working on a third esoteric Hollywood, or is that come out yet? | ||
| Uh Jay, welcome to the show, sir. | ||
| Uh yeah, that ships actually in a few days. | ||
| So I'm glad you mentioned that. | ||
| Yeah, that will be my third Hollywood book, completing the trilogy, and then I have a couple of philosophy books. | ||
| So technically five books, but yeah, that's the the final of the trilogy. | ||
| I was gonna say, it's uh it is it easier or harder for you because I and I love the first two esoteric Hollywood books. | ||
| Um I'm looking forward to the third. | ||
| But you know, when you wrote the first two, they it seemed like they still tried to conceal it. | ||
| It seemed like, you know, you had to find things and little symbols, and this is what this means, and this is now you got Lady Gaga dressed up like Satan with a bunch of like naked women writhing in pain underneath her, and it's like do we even need to analyze this anymore? | ||
| Can we just point at it and go, look, guys, look at what they're doing. | ||
| I mean, is it easier or harder for You with with how sort of upfront they are about their evil now. | ||
| It seems like there was a real pivot moment when Bruce Gender was woman of the year. | ||
| It seems like after that, in around 2016 or whenever it was, things got way more overt, um, openly satanic. | ||
| If you remember Little Nas X had his satanic shoes, his double shoes sort of marketing gimmick. | ||
| Yeah, a lot of it's marketing gimmicks for sure, but also there is this uh you know layer to which I think some of these people are serious about their ritual magic and their occultism. | ||
| So I would say you're right. | ||
| Like most of most of them and most movies that come out are just not really any good anymore. | ||
| It's really hard. | ||
| You have to search for I spent more time like looking for a decent movie, right? | ||
| Watching trailers and trying to find old movies than I do actually watching movies. | ||
| So yeah, I think you're right, Harrison. | ||
| Well, and how has that affected the way that that the bad guys approach things? | ||
| Because obviously Hollywood was an incredibly powerful tool for shaping minds. | ||
| Now Hollywood's not nearly as powerful as it once was. | ||
| Nobody really cares about what they're doing. | ||
| And it's it's amazing. | ||
| When you go back and watch things from the pre-Trump era, I always forget how what a big deal celebrity was back then. | ||
| It's sort of fallen off. | ||
| Back then, I mean, you could listen to a radio show, and the only thing they'd be talking about was Tom Cruise and his daughter, and it was it was all celebrity gossip. | ||
| That's sort of fallen by the wayside. | ||
| Are they less powerful now, or are they changing the way they're doing things? | ||
| Yeah, social media for good and for ill has had a huge impact on that whole domain. | ||
| It's sort of replaced the old ideas of the celebrities. | ||
| And so now celebrities actually kind of try to also be social media people. | ||
| And they've begun sort of putting social media people into movies, actually, in the last year or so. | ||
| Your role is sometimes dependent upon the degree to which you have a following. | ||
| But a lot of that can be, you know, fake, can be created. | ||
| We know that people buy bots all the time. | ||
| So both things are happening. | ||
| Hollywood's dying, it doesn't have the power that it had. | ||
| Uh, it served its purpose though, because it was there to, well, to do many things, but to control the population through giving us new mythologies and new stories and new narratives to guide our lives by kind of a replacement for biblical Christianity and the purpose that it served in Western civilization. | ||
| But also now, you know, video games are taking over and and the brain blast through brain rot of TikTok has pretty much taken his place and serves his purpose. | ||
| So you talk to young people, they don't know what movies are or music are, but they can tell you all that. | ||
| Short short break, we'll be right back with uh Jay Dyer, don't go anywhere. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Jay Dyer is my guest. | ||
| You can find his website, Jaysanalysis.com, and he's on YouTube at Jay Dyer. | ||
| Uh and you're you're on X as well, I know. | ||
| What's your uh what's your X count? | ||
| How do people find you there? | ||
| Yeah, pretty much Jay Dyer everywhere. | ||
| I think on Instagram, um Jay's analysis, but you can still find me pretty easily. | ||
| Um so yeah, I mean, you know, the the Hollywood mass mind control complex served as purpose, and it's kind of uh it's kind of shedding its skin and sort of morphing into something new. | ||
| Um, and I I think video games are taking over. | ||
| You know, the younger you go, the less kids care about um movies and they don't have the attention span to sit through even you know a one and a half hour movie, much less a two-hour movie. | ||
| So I think video games have done their job, and uh TikTok has done its job to sort of destroy attention spans. | ||
| I was listening to some research that uh some teachers were citing, and they were talking about how bad it is in their grade school and even high school classes that no one can read. | ||
| They don't know anything. | ||
| Uh, they have the attention span of I think eight seconds is the max or the average. | ||
| So I mean, we we're raising up a zombie generation that will just be a mindless horde of orcs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Uh I mean, nothing blows my mind more than the man on the street interviews where they'll go around like usually it's like uh, you know, New York, uh Times Square or something, and people don't know, I mean, they don't know how much a quarter is worth. | ||
| They don't know that Utah is a state, they don't know how many moons we have. | ||
| It's like I I worry, I worry quite a bit. | ||
| And it almost seems Like Hollywood sort of destroyed itself, right? | ||
| Because they've spent so long undermining the things that humans connect to that they can't even make good stories anymore. | ||
| They've destroyed the concept of a hero. | ||
| So it's like nobody wants to watch a movie about a girl boss who has every who, you know, has everything she needs, and everybody else just needs to get out of her way. | ||
| It's like, no, we want the struggle. | ||
| We want, you know, to see people fall and then rise up against all odds. | ||
| And Hollywood just can't seem to make that stuff anymore. | ||
| And in a way, it's a consequence of their own ideology sort of coming to fruition, isn't it? | ||
| Yeah, the Frankfurt School many years ago, the cultural Marxist warriors put out a book about the authoritarian personality. | ||
| And they said that the real root of the authoritarian personality isn't a political leader or a tyrant and government. | ||
| It's actually the father. | ||
| The dad of a family is the archetype and the root of all fascism. | ||
| So the roots of Antifa, which you could say go all the way back to something like the Bolsheviks, go all the way back to the Fabian socialists, actually had a lot of terminology and slogans that you still see being used by social justice warriors, Maoism, et cetera. | ||
| That's the roots of that. | ||
| Um, and it's this weird inverted envy-based system where you have to destroy anything that is better, because better could only happen on the basis of some form of oppression. | ||
| And so, in this weird inverted morality or anti-morality, I guess you could say immorality. | ||
| Um, it's actually a form of greed, a form of envy that cloaks itself as equality and fairness, as I'm sure everybody in this audience knows in terms of Marxism and fair, you know, equalitarianism. | ||
| But same principle applies for what we're talking about here, where, yeah, like I mean, there was a study, I think Alex mentioned it, where some high percentage of Gen Z and Gen Alpha are beginning to think as they come up that capitalism has failed. | ||
| And so the only answer is socialism Marxism. | ||
| So Marxism is making a return. | ||
| And there were British Ministry of Defense papers that were being written, uh, I think about 18 years ago. | ||
| Uh, you can read the one of The Guardian, where they said they predicted that Marxism would make a comeback. | ||
| So that's where we are destruction of the family, destruction of the archetype of the father, destruction of God the Father, who is the ultimate archetype of the father. | ||
| All those things go together to create this um technocratic future that we're going into. | ||
| Yeah, and it's it's it's something that's like I notice it, but I don't exactly know how to define it exactly. | ||
| Um, because what you're talking about has really, you know, crazy real world implications. | ||
| We talk a lot about the Kintler study in Germany, and and you know, that's the one where they were literally handing out children to pedophiles. | ||
| The pedos, yeah. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And so you look at that and you go, what why would they do that, right? | ||
| Okay, there are they're pedophiles, obviously, and they, you know, there's the the obvious reason why they'd want to, but how did they justify it? | ||
| And what you learn is that the guy who conducted the experiment, his dad was a Nazi, and his whole thing was, okay, Nazism, fascism descends from sexual purity. | ||
| So we got to destroy that to, you know, so we never have fascism again. | ||
| So it goes right to the heart of what you're saying, that it's like the father and and sexual purity has been identified by these people as something evil. | ||
| And then the other thing that comes to mind is that image of that I reference all the time. | ||
| I really should just have it like taped to the desk or something. | ||
| Because it to me, it just goes again right to the heart of the leftists, which is that image of the 1950s happy family, but over each person, it's like, you know, the dad's like, I'm secretly gay. | ||
| You know, the daughter, you know, the wife is like, I was lobotomized and have to take all these drugs just to deal with my life. | ||
| And there's something about seeing a nice, happy family and Americana cooking out that left to see that, and they go, there has to be something evil and sick and twisted underneath it. | ||
| Nothing can be good. | ||
| And I'm I so we recognize it, but I can't quite define it. | ||
| I can't quite like sink my teeth into like what is behind what drives that mentality. | ||
| St. John Chrysostom said that the family is a little church. | ||
| It's a small icon of what the church is, a bigger version of the family. | ||
| So that's a fundamental concept in the Orthodox church that we we always go back to because the reason that the left hates that is the same idea that when people, you know, vampires see a cross, they shriek because anything that's an icon Or an image or a reminder of the good, | ||
| the pure, the holy, or the archetypal referencing back to God, uh those things are innately going to cause a recoil reaction from vampires. | ||
| And you know, the left is pretty much a bunch of orc goblin vampires that are demonically energized, and that's why they act that way. | ||
| I would add too, funny you mentioned the sexual revolution because you just brought to mind speaking of the Frankfurt School. | ||
| One of the other characters connected to it was Wilhelm Reich. | ||
| You may know him from Orgone fame, which is this bizarre con artist thing that he came up with, which is like a bunch of trash stuck together in a piece of plastic, which somehow mystically brings good vibes. | ||
| I don't know what it's supposed to do. | ||
| It's obviously some some sort of nonsense. | ||
| But Wilhelm Reich is also known for being uh connected to the Frankfurt School and a proponent of sexual revelation sexual revolution and liberation, all the pan type stuff that we talk about. | ||
| And he was very candid about why he was such a big proponent of it. | ||
| He said that in order to get rid of the patriarchy, you have to have the rise of feminism, the goddess, and sexual revolution, because that would be the only way the society would disintegrate. | ||
| As long as there was phallocentric or logos-based masculine order, there would be boundaries. | ||
| Men set boundaries, God sets boundaries. | ||
| That's the purpose of uh law. | ||
| And you can't have love without law and without boundaries. | ||
| And that's why all those things necessarily go together. | ||
| So to destroy the male archetype, destroy the archetype of God the Father results in the necessary destruction of the family and the sexual liberation of society as a whole and the rise of and promotion of the goddess. | ||
| And so Wilhelm Reich said that the new age movement would have to endorse and promote in the 60s countercoastal revolution as well, uh, feminism and feminine uh sexual liberation in order to have the society that we're going into. | ||
| And he was absolutely correct. | ||
| I mean, he's evil, but he was open about it. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And as so many of these people are, uh it seems almost like they think that if they're open about their evil, it doesn't make it evil anymore. | ||
| I'm sure you've noticed that, where uh the streamer Destiny comes to mind where he's just engaged in the most disgusting stuff. | ||
| But just because he's just upfront about it, he acts like it's like no big deal. | ||
| And it's like, no, it's still you're what you're doing is still deeply immoral. | ||
| You just aren't uh shy about it for some reason, which is really more of an indictment of you than anything else. | ||
| Uh yeah, or you know, order versus I'm just like taking notes as you're writing, William Reich, uh, order versus chaos. | ||
| Uh, because that that's another thing that I think that people pitch chaos as if it's freedom. | ||
| They they see order and they say that's a trap, that's oppression. | ||
| You're being controlled. | ||
| Uh, but in reality, when you really think about it, I mean, to have liberty, you have to have peace. | ||
| To have peace, you have to have order. | ||
| They want to extract us from the order, throw you into a world of chaos and say, you're free, have fun. | ||
| Uh, and that's not that's not really how it works, right? | ||
| But it's a very compelling argument they make when they say these these rules that are being set down are restricting you, you have to break free from them. | ||
| How do you make the argument for order? | ||
| Well, for anything to function, there has to be some obviously some set of rules, some set of of authority, some set of agreed upon principles. | ||
| So, I mean, to me, that's just the most common sense thing. | ||
| That anyone would argue against that is kind of like I don't know, I don't even know if you could wait, there's no point in wasting time even arguing with a person that doesn't see that. | ||
| But I I mean, most of society, unfortunately, has been brainwashed into this position. | ||
| So it's actually a very popular position. | ||
| And the idea, I think, is that freedom necessitates uh all removal of restraints, no boundaries, right? | ||
| Uh, love is love, these phrases that we hear, these sort of slogans that people say, and really what they mean is whatever my body desires, whatever I want is quote, love. | ||
| Uh, or they mistake it for an emotion or a passion or uh, you know, as we would say, like you know, biological desires or passions, these kinds of things, they're not inherently bad, but if they're misordered or misdirected, then they end up being a net negative for the individual and for society as a whole. | ||
| So you can't have a society that functions, for example, where, say, theft is legal. | ||
| I mean, if theft is legal, nobody can run a business. | ||
| Nobody can have a home, nobody can have private property, nobody can have, you know, their family. | ||
| So Very basic ideas that are obviously essential to running anything, whether a business or a school or a home, would have to be uh would be impossible in situations where there were absolutely no boundaries. | ||
| Um, but this is really the root of liberalism and leftism. | ||
| I remember reading a famous essay by the famous um uh semiotician, Umberto Echo. | ||
| He wrote an essay, I think it was in the New York Times maybe, but it was many years ago. | ||
| And he's a sort of super liberal postmodernist, uh, but he was very honest in this article. | ||
| It's called Urfascism, and he says that the real enemy that the left must always combat isn't political. | ||
| It's actually the idea of capital T truth, or the idea that there is such a thing as truth. | ||
| In other words, fascism in his mindset is anything that says that there's objective truth, that there's right and wrong, that there's values, that's all fascism. | ||
| And so the left is at, he says, an eternal war against truth. | ||
| So that's a lot more honest than part of the left who tries to have the moral high ground. | ||
| Of course, they don't believe in morals anyway. | ||
| So don't let them have the moral high ground because they don't believe in morals. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And and it again, it seems like this is sort of a through line through so much of what we're talking about. | ||
| The battle between subjectivism and objectivism. | ||
| And of course, if you think about that, it's it's obvious what that really is is a battle between man and God, right? | ||
| Objective truth is God, it's just how the world is, and subjective truth is the worship of the self. | ||
| What I think and how I feel must be true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| So it this really is, and it's like I can't remember what I was talking about yesterday, but I probably went on a five-minute rant about subjective versus objective yesterday. | ||
| I don't remember what it was, but it was some political thing because it's just this through line. | ||
| Uh, do people even realize that that's what they're doing? | ||
| Like this is this is my struggle is like, how do we even get through to people who genuinely don't care about objective truth? | ||
| Is it even worth it to try to get through to them? | ||
| Like I I, as a Christian, I have to think it is, but at a certain point, you see some of these people and you go, they're they are too lost for us to to gather back into the fold. | ||
| Like we just have to destroy them. | ||
| I mean, how do we deal with the population almost willfully engaged in this subjectivism that just completely eradicates any ability for us to connect to one another on the basis of anything other than our own selfish desires? | ||
| Yeah, I did a live stream this week on my channel, and I'll be doing a live stream uh right after this. | ||
| If you want to come to my channel after your show and check out uh a lot of these topics that we discuss uh pretty frequently on J uh Jay Dyer channel on YouTube. | ||
| But I was talking about how you know the scriptures often discuss characters called the sons of Belial or sometimes translated as worthless persons. | ||
| Now that's not to say that people can't be saved if they're evil, because of course anybody can conceivably be saved, even if you're Paul on the road to Damascus, you're a very wicked person killing Christians, uh, you can still convert. | ||
| But the thing is that the more that you sink into evil, a lot of times it takes really intense things to repent. | ||
| In other words, sometimes people have to have really serious illnesses, death of a family member, war times, right? | ||
| A lot of those things are the strong medicine that we end up having to have to induce us to repentance, which shakes us out of that sort of narcissist narcissist narcissist mirror staring that we have when we are uh not a believer in objective truth when we think that we are our own gods, and that was the temptation that Satan gave in the garden was that man would be his own God. | ||
| He would determine uh right and wrong. | ||
| He would determine reality, et cetera. | ||
| All of all those are the things that Satan offers. | ||
| And everybody born into this world uh who's born fallen, necessarily grows up with that fallen perspective that they are themselves their own little gods. | ||
| And by God's grace, as you said, you know, some of us uh are brought out of that. | ||
| Sometimes it takes, you know, really intense personal things to to get us out of that. | ||
| But ultimately, I think it's a case-by-case basis. | ||
| If you're talking with somebody that you're trying to wake up and they're, you know, ex excessively wicked, they're they're a destiny type person. | ||
| I would move on. | ||
| I wouldn't have anything to do with them. | ||
| In fact, people tried for years to get me to do debates with destiny. | ||
| I offered one time to do a theistic debate, and he would only do a political debate. | ||
| Um, I didn't think that was worth my time. | ||
| And I had another friend that debated destiny, and I warned that person that, you know, he's not a good faith debater. | ||
| You're just kind of I think it's a waste of time. | ||
| And I think Destiny's really, that was years ago. | ||
| I think he's really shown his true colors. | ||
| So my psychological profiling assessment of destiny was accurate, that he's not worth anyone's time. | ||
| He's just really a son of Belial. | ||
| Again, he can repent. | ||
| He can, uh, you know, God's grace can can reach anybody, but uh that doesn't mean that you're you have to be a doormat and let wicked people walk all over you. | ||
| That's ridiculous. | ||
| That's not that's more of a weird evangelical teaching. | ||
| It's not the biblical teaching. | ||
| It's not the teaching of historic Christianity. | ||
| I mean that's why I believe that there is and should be the death penalty. | ||
| There should be by the state uh it should be practiced uh for heinous crimes. | ||
| Um you know it's what Paul lays out in Romans 13. | ||
| Uh so that I think would be a restoration of the notion of justice in society would do uh a lot to um heal some of the ills uh in our system but again the system's also corrupt in a very vast systemic way. | ||
| I'm not saying Trump's all evil or anything like that. | ||
| I'm just saying like the system itself uh when it becomes systemically corrupt it's uh it's difficult to turn things around sometimes it takes generations right we might not turn this around uh you know for several decades. | ||
| Well it's about it's about interrupting that feedback loop right because once once you reach that critical mass of corruption it becomes okay you have to be corrupt to even play the game and so you know obviously that's sort of where we're we're opening up the door to um I had a map yesterday of the you know map of the world by and countries by corruption and you can see it's you know Western Europe and America have so little corruption and in Australia, you know, basically anywhere the diaspora uh out of Europe goes, you had very low levels of corruption everywhere else extremely high levels of corruption. | ||
| You know it if you go to Mexico, you're probably going to get pulled over you're probably going to get shaken down for 50 to 100 bucks by whatever cop can pull you over and it's like man once that practice gets embedded it's almost impossible to to extricate so we're really losing like two thousand years of like building up trust as as community is you know incredibly rapidly as uh the UN you know floods our country with people from you know the third world that and again it's not even I'm not even saying it to like be offensive. | ||
| Like if you talk to people from the third world there will be video of a of a you know Indian politician just handing out money as he drives through the town and to us that's like oh my God of corruption paying for votes you know uh just hey I'm rich so pay you know vote for me. | ||
| But uh he's not shy he's not doing it clandestinely it's like no I do this and and you talk to people from third world and they're like well he gave me the most money why wouldn't I vote for him? | ||
| Like that's how things work. | ||
| So like we're losing something really really fundamental here as we as we drift you know ever towards uh ever towards the abyss is it too late to stop it now how do we uh you know intercede and and halt this feedback loop and and then how do we reverse it? | ||
| Is that possible um I think probably where I would differ with a lot of people is that I'm not saying politics doesn't matter and that you can't affect it. | ||
| But it seems like to be politically effective it takes a significant amount of money. | ||
| And unless you're in the hundred million billion dollar class as an individual you're probably not going to be super effective. | ||
| Not that you can't on an individual level share the videos get the word out support you know uh Alex by going to the InfoWars or Alex store and all that but I mean I I tend to think that uh the best change happens when individuals themselves undergo change particularly I know the Orthodox church is definitely all about changing you as an individual and making you uh get on a path of improvement. | ||
| So I think it's the real self-improvement model. | ||
| And that's the thing that for example that's the real change. | ||
| Uh not that politics is irrelevant but politics is downstream I think from these issues. | ||
| These issues are more fundamental because for example a lot of right wing uh leaders in the last few decades have turned out to be very morally um corrupt and so the right doesn't get anywhere because so many people are compromised and so forth. | ||
| And I'm not saying we have to be saints and angels to be in politics or whatever. | ||
| Nobody's nobody but I mean if we can expect basic uh levels of like you know just don't put things in your butt uh don't you know diddle kids right then like let's start there for the people that are going to be in public office. | ||
| We have the lowest bar on the they still can't cross it. | ||
| It's I know right I mean long story short I'm sorry what what I all I'm trying to say is like the guys that I saw converting for example to Orthodox that were my good buddies back in say 2017 18 Those guys are married, starting families, you know, they're moving in the right direction. | ||
| If you're, you know, 20 and you're an incel and you're having rage uh and you are all upset about politics, you got to get your uh your own situation ironed out first. | ||
| And I think the Orthodox Church is very good at helping in that regard. | ||
| Um, and then beyond that, I think things like getting independent with your own uh monetary sovereignty through things like Bitcoin, um, you know, trying to get out of these cities, move to the country, homesteading, all those things are great, great pluses. | ||
| Yeah, and and you know, uh not only are our politicians, you know, utterly corrupt, but there's also you sort of hinted at it before, there's this uh strain of Christianity, or at least there's an excuse that Christianity gives, I think a lot of our leaders where they go, hey, I'm you know, I can't, we gotta forgive these people, or we can't be too harsh. | ||
| It it there's a there's like a weak strain of Christianity that I think is is sort of working in tandem with the corrupt to give them the excuse that hey, we have to forgive and forget that's not our place. | ||
| And it's like, no, that kinda is our place. | ||
| And and this is you know, really entered back into the conversation or or been a major topic of conversation since Charlie Kirk's murder and his wife saying that she forgave the killer, which I would think is Christians, like we are called to forgive people even that do horrible things to us, but you got a lot of people going, well, I don't forgive him, and even Trump going, Yeah, I still hate my enemies. | ||
| How have you interpreted that whole conversation uh since since uh Charlie Kirk's memorial on Sunday? | ||
| Yeah, this is really the influence of uh evangelicalism and pietism, uh, which have tended to think that the state itself is an evil institution or an institution that is uh itself anti-Christ. | ||
| You have a history of Protestants and the evangelicals uh identifying the papacy or even the state itself as anti-Christ. | ||
| Roger Williams, of course, the famous Baptist uh was one of the first to actually say that there should be absolute separation, uh, not just of church and state, but God from state. | ||
| And I think that this is just really kind of getting further down the road uh as we go down the the path of church history, severing not just uh church and state, which actually the Byzantine model, for example, you have one bird with two heads. | ||
| That's not a Masonic symbol. | ||
| Mason's appropriated that. | ||
| That's church and state working together with the same body because they're two powers, one directed towards the temporal, the state, the other directed towards the spiritual, but they kind of have to work together because God is God of also the secular realm. | ||
| So there is no such thing really as a secular realm. | ||
| There's just different domains and different provinces that have, for whatever reason, even back to the enlightenment and the reformation, etc., completely divorced the idea of the divine and the transcendent from government and from society. | ||
| Oh, that's your personal private stuff. | ||
| Uh nothing like that in the history of Christianity. | ||
| First thousand years of Christianity is Christian emperors and Christian kings everywhere, kingdoms, everywhere. | ||
| It seems like this was so this is a very modern thing. | ||
| Yeah, and it's it's almost a scam that our churches are buying into the government doesn't have to come in and say you stay out of our business. | ||
| Churches themselves go, whoa, whoa, whoa, we want nothing to do with that. | ||
| And it's like, well, why do you think you're losing so bad? | ||
| Obviously. | ||
| We'll be right back with Jay Dyer, Jay's Analysis.com. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is the war room brought to you, of course, by the Alex Jones store.com, the Alex Jones store.com. | ||
| Go there today. | ||
| It's buy one, get one for all methylene blue products this weekend. | ||
| You're not gonna want to miss out on that. | ||
| It's one of our best-selling products for very good reason. | ||
| Try yourself and see what it can do for you, methyl and blue on sale. | ||
| Buy one, get one free this weekend only, the alexjones store.com. | ||
| My guest is Jay Dyer. | ||
| Jay's analysis.com. | ||
| I'm I'm gonna I'm gonna appeal to your analysis here, Jay. | ||
| And of course he's on YouTube at Jay Dyer and on X at Jay Dyer as well. | ||
| Have you seen the video, Jay, of this uh it's a Jewish service, I guess. | ||
| It's uh Rosh Hashanah, and they're talking about how human sacrifice is still a thing. | ||
| Have you seen this? | ||
| It's gone viral today. | ||
| So I want to watch it and I want to get your take on it. | ||
| if you don't mind. | ||
| No, I'm not, I mean, I'm familiar with the trends and traditions of certain sects and groups within Judaism and the Sabbateans and others to think that sometimes these things can be done for magical or ritual purposes, but I'm not familiar with the specific video. | ||
| I want to go this video because it's you know, it's at some big um big templar or synagogue somewhere, and it's just it's just kind of bizarre. | ||
| And it's got a lot of people wondering like, what is this woman talking about? | ||
| What is the what is the spiritual background of this? | ||
| And I just want to get your interpretation of it. | ||
| And uh, yeah, and it this is this in no way obviously uh condemns all Jews in any uh way at all, in the same way if I saw a church service with a pastor saying something creepy about how we have to have human sacrifice. | ||
| Well, let's watch it and get and get Jay's analysis on the other side. | ||
| Uh you'll see a clip and then it the audience, the radio audience will hear, you know, the audio go down. | ||
| Whoever edited this put little title cards in the middle where they just sort of put their own comments. | ||
| We can ignore those. | ||
| Uh and as far as I know, this video is legit, and I'm I'm just I need some spiritual advice on uh exactly what's happening here. | ||
| Let's go to clip number 18. | ||
| Uh this was uh filmed over Rosh Hashanah this year. | ||
| Let's watch the greatest lie humanity tells itself is that we have outgrown human sacrifice. | ||
| We call it by different names now, and make our offering to different gods. | ||
| We offer young men we call soldiers, as if the designation means that their mothers cry less when they die. | ||
| We call masses of humanity collateral damage. | ||
| And turn our eyes away from the pictures of their lifeless bodies as we sip our morning coffee. | ||
| And the truth is we don't do it because we are heartless. | ||
| We do it because we believe that it is necessary for the world to keep running. | ||
| We do it because we believe that the gods whose favor we so desperately seek freedom, security, prosperity, flourishing, that they demand blood as the price of their favor. | ||
| We do it because we cannot see any other choice. | ||
| And maybe that's why we read the Akeida, the binding of Isaac on Rosh Hashanah. | ||
| Because the story of the Akeida isn't about inconceivable obedience. | ||
| When Abraham prepares to sacrifice Isaac, he is just accepting the same bargain of blood we still accept today. | ||
| That some need to die for the world to flourish. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| So there's the video. | ||
| Again, I just I don't have you know, interpreting that sort of in my most charitable way, it's about kind of trying to come to terms with sort of the in the inevitability of war and just the horrors that they see and trying to sort of interpret it in a in a biblical mindset. | ||
| But I mean, just what's your what's your takeaway from from watching that? | ||
| Well, my guess would be that's probably some form of reform Judaism given uh the fact that the woman is doing the readings. | ||
| I'm not sure it could be a conservative or perhaps even orthodox uh Judaism. | ||
| And I think that what they're getting at is not that Judaism does this intentionally on in mass uh to sacrifice the deities. | ||
| I think she's saying, like, as a lot of leftists do in most reformed Judaism or any synagogue that has a woman sort of doing that would be more liberal-minded. | ||
| I think what they're saying is like we still have human sacrifice today. | ||
| It's done to gods that we call safety and security. | ||
| Um I don't think she's saying that Judaism in mass practices human sacrifice, even though there are sex within uh, you know, extreme versions of rabbinic Judaism that have seemed to accept it and do it. | ||
| You read about this in the book of Jeremiah, for example, when some of the Jews fell into this practice. | ||
| So there are history, there is historical precedent for Sabatina and Francis or groups within Judaism that do this. | ||
| But I'd I'd my first initial take on that is not that she was saying that we ought to do this, and this is a good thing. | ||
| She's saying that the world today thinks that we've advanced beyond human sacrifices, but we in fact still do it. | ||
| It's just not to gods that we believe are personal deities, but it's to things like war. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Yeah, that that that does make sense. | ||
| I guess it's kind of like um, you know, a Christian saying, Yeah, we still practice human sacrifice, look at planned parenthood, that kind of that kind of thing. | ||
| Exactly. | ||
| Although Judaism typically doesn't believe that abortion is bad. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Yeah, but it but having uh having a woman at the front obviously I would think means they're not exactly traditional uh in a sense. | ||
| And and it does Yeah, I would say that's it's that's gotta be reformed or conservative Judaism, which is open, I think. | ||
| Both of them have maybe conservative doesn't have women rabbis, but they would let them speak. | ||
| I don't but yeah, it's one of those two. | ||
| So yeah, I just thought, and you know, maybe the way it's edited cuts out some context or something, but obviously that that clip's been uh been going viral, and on the face of it, it seems like kind of a a disturbing message, but I do think that uh your your interpretation is probably more accurate. | ||
| And I think that the more I listen to her, the more I'm like, okay, I think I get where she's coming from. | ||
| It but it's also weird that it sounds like she said gods, but maybe you're right that she's referencing these things. | ||
| I think she's saying like we worship the gods like money, security, et cetera. | ||
| But also, you know, the story of Isaac that she's talking about, um, a lot of atheists and people misinterpret that. | ||
| The purpose of the passage is an anti-human sacrifice message. | ||
| Yahweh is the deity that is not going to require human sacrifices. | ||
| And in fact, even the sacrifice of Christ, the Son of God willingly taking on humanity and dying willingly isn't a human sacrifice that pacifies divine vengeance or something like that. | ||
| That's more of a pagan reading. | ||
| In that sense, it's an end to the power of death, which we believe is an unnatural power that Christ did as an act of love. | ||
| So far from it being uh one divine person paying off an angry divine person in some sort of Zeus pagan type transaction. | ||
| Orthodox Christianity and the Christianity of the first thousand years has always interpreted this as an action of love that's intended to actually destroy the power of death and give us victory over death. | ||
| Well, and there's a difference between sacrificing yourself and you know sacrificing somebody else, right? | ||
| I that I think is what sort of disturbed me about is is framing people who have been killed in war as a sacrifice by the people who killed them. | ||
| And it's like the you don't have a right to sacrifice somebody else's life uh in the same way, you know. | ||
| But but even, you know, for the people that worshipped Moloch, like at least it was their kid they're giving ostensibly, uh, as as horrifying as that is, that's still a form of s of personal sacrifice, but you know, just killing an enemy, I I I think portraying that as sacrifice is a little bit uh a little bit a little bit of an odd um perspective. | ||
| But anyway, I just I know that video's been going viral, and um I didn't play it to be like, see Jews sacrifice you. | ||
| I I don't believe that, but it's just I've been seeing people uh interpret it that way, and I don't think that's the way it was meant to be interpreted, but I still think it it represents sort of a something that I wouldn't when she says gods, I think your interpretation's right. | ||
| But originally I heard it and it's like, okay, the if if you define Jews as one thing, it's the fact they believe in one God. | ||
| It's kind of what they're all about, actually. | ||
| It's kind of what made them, you know, totally different than everybody else around them in ancient times. | ||
| So it was weird to me that she kept referencing gods, but maybe you're right. | ||
| She's referencing just to these things we almost treat as gods. | ||
| I'd say, uh well, I mean, you'll get as many Jews as you talk to, uh that's as many Judaisms as you'll get. | ||
| So I mean I mean, Judaism is an interesting the way it functions is basically like you don't really question what the rabbi says. | ||
| So if your rabbi says this, and then there's three rabbis down the road that contradict him, you just go with your what your rabbi says. | ||
| So you're not really it's not really a religion predicated on this the same ideas uh of we th uh that we think of in terms of like objective truth and uh everybody can be wrong, but this position is correct. | ||
| It's a lot more um, I guess you could say uh uh it's dependent upon not just the rabbinical structure, but it's more so focused at worshiping the idea of Judaism or the race of the people itself, particularly when we get to modern Zionism. | ||
| That's a lot more of an atheistic, socialistic type of movement. | ||
| And Moses Hess basically says that it's kind of a worship of the nation state itself. | ||
| That's the real deity in terms of Zionism. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Well, and and on that note, you know, that's obviously another giant topic of conversation right now. | ||
| Sorry from New York Post today, Gin Z's casual anti-Semitism is growing, seated by influencers like uh Tucker Carlson. | ||
| There's a video from earlier today, or at least it was, you know, went viral earlier today. | ||
| I think it was maybe from a thing yesterday. | ||
| Uh clip 47 here. | ||
| This is the ADL CEO, Jonathan Greenblatt talking about the rise in anti-Semitism. | ||
| And I I want to get your your take on this. | ||
| Uh not even necessarily a spiritual take, but just the geopolitical take of this, because I don't know what Israel's gonna do at this point. | ||
| We've got nay, you know, maybe we'll just play some of these as uh as B-roll so we don't waste your time going to these videos. | ||
| But you know, the Jonathan Greenblatt was bemoaning the fact that they say half the people in the world now are anti-Semitic, and the children are even more anti-Semitic than that, and then Netanyahu's giving a speech to the UN and everybody standing up and walking out. | ||
| That's clip uh 24. | ||
| If we want to play that as B-roll. | ||
| Uh it seems like Israel is losing all of its um, you know, adherents or or supporters around the world. | ||
| Seems like they've got the American Congress pretty locked down, but the American people uh are sort of slipping through their grip. | ||
| And obviously, Europe is starting to recognize Palestine as a state, and they've cut off weapons uh transfers to them. | ||
| How does this tie into maybe some of the end time prophecies, the the world turning against Israel, and then geopolitically, how do you think they're going to deal with this? | ||
| I mean, it seems like they are on a on a downward slope uh in terms of anti-Semitism, and nothing they're trying is is reversing that trend. | ||
| What do you think comes next? | ||
| Well, I don't necessarily know that it relates to the end times. | ||
| I mean, it certainly could, but uh, you know, when you get into again the way that a lot of Israel functions in the modern world, um, it's it's it has a lot of parallels with kind of an organized crime structure. | ||
| So they have a kind of an organized crime uh government, and you could say you have Netanyahu kind of heading up or uh a very important player in that. | ||
| That's why Israel has a tendency to protect a lot of uh international criminals. | ||
| And I'm speaking there at the government level, but I think amongst the population, there I'm sure there's quite a bit of uh diversity, and there are quite a few other people groups in Israel. | ||
| Uh for example, the so it's not uh one size fits all all collective thing. | ||
| For example, the third largest landowner in Israel is the Orthodox Church. | ||
| People don't know that, but it's the third largest landowner. | ||
| I'm sure that the Israeli government hates that and probably wants to get rid of all of the kind of the churches and groups Yeah, exactly. | ||
| They they're taking churches and um turning Christian quarters uh that are historic districts into you know gay bars and uh gay gay areas. | ||
| So what does that tell you? | ||
| I mean, um I think that it there's so many layers to this. | ||
| First of all, as Victor Ostrovsky says, the former Mossad writer, he gave a lecture that's still on YouTube, and he says that the anti-Semitism card is a card that's been played forever. | ||
| Uh, you know, it's you just roll that out, throw throw that card down just like when the left calls everybody racist and Hitler. | ||
| And uh the problem is that that's not working anymore because people uh you know, you can kind of use that up and it it eventually it loses its effect. | ||
| Uh and so people don't really care about being called anti-Semitic anymore. | ||
| And also people are figuring out that it's it doesn't really consistently apply. | ||
| You know, it's like uh, well, if you read Genesis, Arabs or I guess you could say Muslims or you know, heg Hagarites or Hagarines as the traditional Christian description calls them, they are also Semitic peoples. | ||
| So why is it that we get this sort of, you know, group of people, many of whom are actual much later Khazarian converts. | ||
| I'm not saying everybody. | ||
| I know that there's Mizrahi and there's Sephardic and there's uh Ashkenazi, and uh I'm aware of all that, but obviously quite a few people are converts, and so they're not technically speaking Semitic people. | ||
| So it's just sort of like laying claim to the title of Shem or Semite, as if no one else is of that genetic lineage, but then it can kind of flip between a genetic uh description uh of a people group and then flip over to a religious description, so whenever it needs. | ||
| So it's kind of amorphous in that way. | ||
| Um, but people I think are learning that uh if you look at really serious rabbinic Judaism, I'm not saying every individual person is bad, but the religion itself is very superstitious, it's very cult-like if you look at the way that you know the the Jewish areas function where they will get around the Sabbath rule by putting up a string around the neighborhood so that you walk around inside uh on the Sabbath, even though you're outside, but there's a string around the neighborhood. | ||
| So and there's all these cut sorts of like tricks to trick God within um actual rabbinic Judaism. | ||
| And the internet is kind of making this um easily accessible and and well known when probably you know, 50, 60 years ago, people didn't really know that unless they studied religion or went, you know, into the Jewish district or whatever in New York and saw it firsthand. | ||
| So people are figuring out that um a lot of what they're told, especially say evangelical dispensationalists, so-called Christians in America, um, that's all a hijacked thing that was bought off and influenced by foreign lobby groups uh decades ago and that isn't Christianity it's nothing to do with historic Christianity it's a sect and it promotes and is there to foist geopolitical uh ideas upon dumb Bible belt people but | ||
| that stranglehold is uh starting to break so that's why people are not caring about being called uh anti-Semitic uh the the card has been used too many times and also uh Israel is brazenly acting according to uh Talmudic principles by trying to get rid of all the Palestinians and calling everyone Amalek. | ||
| Amalek is the old uh testament uh enemy of Israel who when the Jews were uh uh traveling the uh Amalek killed the people who were at the back like the women and the children and so Amalek is then a perpetual term for anyone who is an opponent uh of Israel or the Zionist state in this case and so they're all called Amalek and thus they're able to be eradicated. | ||
| And I think Netanyahu made reference to this right before there was the movements uh in terms of getting rid of the people in Gaza a year or two ago whenever that was yeah that's uh so that that that all plays into what is going on here and then you have actual people who are going too far to the extreme and then thinking that they have then a right to hate all Jewish people or to hate an entire group of people uh which is not correct and both of these things can be true. | ||
| You can have a a religion that is false that is like a cult uh and at the same time as Christians we're not allowed to hate these people uh we have to love and hope for uh repentance and salvation as Paul talks about in Romans 9 through 11 for Jews as well. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And what I was going to say is that, yeah, I believe the statement from Netanyahu calling his enemies Amalek was like used as evidence in his trial for genocide going, look, this is what this means because that's what the how the Bible uses or refers to Amalek, destroy them, all of them, you know, man, women and child. | ||
| And, you know, the reason why these things used to work, they don't work as well now, but for the most part, especially American people, we're actually genuinely good people. | ||
| We don't want to be mean. | ||
| We don't want to be. | ||
| to be you know enemies of anybody so when you're told something is racist most people really genuinely go oh gee well I don't want to be racist I better avoid that I'm not anti-Semitic I would you know I don't hate the Jews I better not say that right now but then it gets used so much and it gets used I'm I've got videos today the head of the Mossad saying you know talking about Jeffrey Epstein being a part of Mossad makes you anti-Semitic and it's like you say that enough and people stop taking it seriously or they embrace it and they go you're gonna keep calling me an anti-Semitic I guess I am an anti-Semite. | ||
| And I, of course, think that's just you're just letting your mind be controlled again by really the same forces. | ||
| It's just you're allowing it to control the opposite way than than people who, you know, really are scared of that of that term and shy away from it. | ||
| And but we have to be able to talk about this. | ||
| And I think that's the big issue and why I sort of almost have a responsibility to talk about it, because we can't we're not going to come to any solutions. | ||
| And it's obviously not good for anybody, least of all the Jews, when, you know, their, you know, anti-Semitism is being used to protect the Jeffrey Epstein pedophile connections like we have to be able to talk about this openly. | ||
| to see it with clear eyes and I've always said I you know I treat extremist Jews like I treat extremist Christians like yeah every religion has people sort of on that far end of the spectrum and it's sort of the people's in that religion to go hey that's not us. | ||
| I'm not Westboro Baptist church okay I want nothing to do with them. | ||
| They can call themselves Christians all they want but that ain't me. | ||
| All right and drawing that distinction I think is important. | ||
| And and again obviously this conversation is a difficult one and it's one that really doesn't happen uh around the country. | ||
| How do you think we have this conversation in a way that is productive and is not reductive and does not end with people going, you're gonna call me an asemite I guess I am now because I again I don't think that's uh that's valuable or or helpful at all. | ||
| Well, the problem is this is a nuanced discussion, and a lot of people, just due to everybody kind of being dumbed down, don't want to be nuanced. | ||
| And I think a lot of people also want people to be radicalized because there's a lot of advantage that can be had through radicalizing people. | ||
| And so the more radical people become in these positions or in these attitudes, then you get justification for the reactions, right? | ||
| So it's kind of a problem reaction solution situation to where the more people begin to you know think that oh well if I'm gonna criticize uh Israel or Netanyahu or whatever, and then I get called anti-Semitic, then I guess I'll just be anti-Semitic. | ||
| Oh, I guess I like Hitler now, right? | ||
| So it just sort of pushes people into these extremes. | ||
| And then that extreme can be exploited and can be capitalized upon. | ||
| And ironically, the more people adopt the Hitlerian perspective, the more people uh in Israel will then feel justified in their counter-reaction to that. | ||
| So it's a problem reaction dialectic that necessitates one another. | ||
| And uh, you know, it's the same when people ask and and try to get me arguing about the issue between uh oh, it's d so who do you like Palestinians and Hamas, or do you like uh, you know, Zionism and Net Yahoo? | ||
| And I'm like, well, you you don't think I can from a real sincere nuanced position criticize both of these positions and and say that I'm not really into either one. | ||
| And and I would have a long time ago, maybe 10 years ago, probably been more on the side of uh the Hamas side of things, not because I am pro-Hamas or it, but I was ignorant of Islam. | ||
| And it took me the last seven years of debating a lot of the top Muslims and studying Islam pretty in depth. | ||
| Um right now on my channel, we're lecturing through an FBI consultant's book on al-Qaeda. | ||
| And uh, you know, and and I'm not I'm not saying I don't believe the 9-11, you know, conspiracy narrative. | ||
| I do, I think it was a conspiracy. | ||
| But that doesn't make even if Islam and Islamic radicals who happen to be CIA proxy soldiers like Al Qaeda, I even if they're the ones that are sort of the front group and they're Muslims, like that doesn't make Islam good in my, you know what I mean? | ||
| So it's like if I'm an Orthodox Christian, I have a long pedigree of opposing both rabbinic Judaism and Islam. | ||
| They're both wrong, but these dialectics entrap so many people, and unfortunately, there's just no way to talk about this topic without being nuanced, but most people don't want to be nuanced, and most people in the power structure in these different systems want people to be radicalized and not nuanced. | ||
| And a lot of these people don't even care that you're gonna be nuanced. | ||
| Right. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And they're just gonna assert things uh regardless. | ||
| And and yeah, the false dichotomy uh kills me. | ||
| It's it's you know, I had somebody I I was said something good about uh Charlie Kirk, obviously, because he was a great man. | ||
| And uh, you know, I had somebody who generally agrees with me on the topic of Israel go, oh, but he was a pro-Zionist. | ||
| How can you be sad for him? | ||
| And it's like, you think that's how I I see the world through that dialectic through that dichotomy? | ||
| Either you're you know, a Zionist and uh deserve death, or you're an anti-Zionist and I'm on your it's like no, no, no. | ||
| I can have I can pick my own side, thank you very much. | ||
| And it's the American Christian side. | ||
| And uh yeah, I got I got problems with both as well. | ||
| Again, it's it's sort of a difficult uh discussion to have, but I it's like we have to have this discussion. | ||
| We have to recognize that like no Christianity and Judaism are in fact two different religions. | ||
| I don't know why people can't don't seem to recognize that, but it's true, and uh you know, you gotta you gotta deal with it. | ||
| Oh, just like Islam and Christianity are also to uh irresolvably different religions, right? | ||
| I mean, first of all, Christianity teaches number one the Trinity and the deed of Christ. | ||
| Uh that right away tells you that the deity of Islam and Judaism are different, right? | ||
| And by the way, Islam and Judaism do not believe that Christians have the same deity. | ||
| So those two religions do not believe there is a Judeo-Christian or as Islamo-Christian parallel synthetic thing that we could could erect. | ||
| But they're trying to merge them. | ||
| We only have a minute left. | ||
| This is like the biggest topic in the world, but uh, but they're trying to merge these, right? | ||
| They're you know, the part of the new world order is to combine all three Abrahamic faiths. | ||
| How close do you think they are to that goal? | ||
| Well, it's a challenge to get people on board with that. | ||
| Um, and you know, the more that all the foundations think tanks and the power elites push the uh ecumenist uh new world religion agenda, um, you know, it they they put a lot of money into it, they build the Abrahamic uh faith center in Abu Dhabi and they get the Pope on board and he comes and blesses it. | ||
| And I mean, it it's just it's difficult to get uh and and I'm just gonna be frank here with A lot of say Muslims, you have a lot of people who uh believe Islam in countries where the IQ is around eighty. | ||
| Uh so you're you're not gonna get a lot of nuance out of people with ADIQ, and talking about you know, places like Pakistan and Somalia, and so you know it's it's a challenge to get everybody on board with a new age religion uh in a lot of different ways, and a lot of Muslims are also power structure that they that they you know, as long as the you know the Saudi Arabian clerics are down with it, then everybody downstream will be. | ||
| Man, I can talk to you forever. | ||
| Jay's analysis.com, Jay Dyer on YouTube, Jay Dyer on X. Thank you so much for being with us, sir. | ||
| FBI has a long history of misleading Congress. | ||
| Comey falls into that. | ||
| But the evidence against Comey tonight comes from the FBI and its new director, uh Cash Patel, who promised radical transparency, and he actually provides the key piece of evidence that leads to this indictment. | ||
| If you're a member of Congress and you've been tired of lying, uh being lied to by the FBI, tonight's the first time the FBI actually did something about it. | ||
| They turned in their own man tonight. | ||
| I think that's an extraordinary part of this story. | ||
| The Comey indictment will showcase the worst abuses against the Republic in DOJ history, as the rotting inertia causes the dominoes to fall in the hallowed halls of the district of corruption. | ||
| Even as new bombshell information reveals that a recent disclosure by the FBI to Congress verified that 275 FBI agents were in the crowd on January 6th. | ||
| Far more than the Measley 26 informants that Inspector General Horowitz had been notified of back in December of 2024. | ||
| And now Representative Barry Louder Milk, Chair of the House administration subcommittee on oversight, has called for more details on whether these newly revealed 275 agents or informants were there to monitor, instigate, or simply observe. | ||
| January 6th has never looked more staged, a crime to cover up another crime, but one crime scene at a time. | ||
| The scurrying is beginning. | ||
| James Comey's son-in-law, who prosecuted J Sixers, has resigned his position as assistant U.S. attorney following the news of the former FBI director's indictment, as declassified emails lead squarely back to President Obama's oversight of intelligence community actions in 2016 as a participant in the Russia Gate deception. | ||
| Still, Comey and all of his hubris remains defiant. | ||
| We will not live on our knees. | ||
| Somebody that I love dearly recently said that fear is the tool of a tyrant. | ||
| And she's right. | ||
| My heart is broken for the Department of Justice. | ||
| But I have great confidence in the federal judicial system, and I'm innocent. | ||
| So let's have a trial and keep the faith. | ||
| Comey FBI victim Roger Stone asks why Comey isn't being gagged like he had been. | ||
| And why is Comey being allowed to turn himself in? | ||
| Furthermore, why isn't James Comey being subjected to a 6 a.m. raid on his home by 29 heavily armed FBI agents like Stone and his wife were? | ||
| It bears repeating. | ||
| Former FBI director, James Comey, who led the Russia investigation hoax against Trump now faces indictment. | ||
| The main charge is perjury, aka lying to Congress. | ||
| Now, as you know, Mr. McCabe, who works for you, as publicly and repeatedly stated that he leaked information to the Wall Street Journal and that you were a directly aware of it, and that you directly authorized it. | ||
| Now, what Mr. Kitt McCabe is saying and what you testified to this committee cannot both be true. | ||
| One or the other is false. | ||
| Who's telling the truth? | ||
| I can only speak to my testimony. | ||
| I stand by what uh the testimony you summarized that I gave in May of 2017. | ||
| Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| I needed to get that out into the public square. | ||
| And so I asked a friend of mine to share the content of the memo with a reporter. | ||
| Didn't do it myself for a variety Of reasons, but I asked him to because I thought that might prompt the appointment of a special counsel. | ||
| Declassified notes from John Brennan from 2016 indicate that this information was shared with Obama, Biden, Clapper, and Comey, and showed Clinton's plan to link Trump to Russia to distract from her email scandal. | ||
| Digging deeper in. | ||
| Comey then approved Pfizer warrants on Trump aid Carter Page using the unverified steel dossier, a battle plan funded by Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Brennan, James Clapper, John Bolton, Bruce and Nelly Orr, Stefan Hauper, Peter Struck, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, Rod Rosenstein, Christopher Ray, and Adam Schiff. | ||
| And that's just the Russiagate debacle. | ||
| American Providence, unrelenting truth seekers, and piles of evidence have now ensured that Occam's razor is in full effect. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Convict him, bar him from future service. | |
| Have the prosecutors, the local prosecutors in New York, pursue him for the fraudster that he was before he ever became president. | ||
| Question is not if, but when we welcome back, ladies and gentlemen, this is the war room. | ||
| I'm your host Harrison Smith, brought to you, of course, by the AlexJones Store.com, the Alex Jones Store.com supports us, keeps us on the air and in the fight, and continuing to grow in the face of all of the attacks that we're under. | ||
| We've got just constantly new products. | ||
| We've got constantly new designs on t-shirts and hats. | ||
| So if you even if you've been to the store pretty often, you might want to go check it out every couple days because there's something new that you probably haven't seen. | ||
| Our newest product is the uh creatine. | ||
| We have the highest quality creatine available. | ||
| And of course, the sales are unbeatable. | ||
| Right now, it's buy one get one free on uh the ultra methylene blue, the capsules or the tincture. | ||
| Buy one get one free this weekend only, the Alex Jones store.com, the Alex Jones store.com/slash Harrison, if you want to let them know who sent you. | ||
| And with that, I'm very happy to welcome my guest, Tis Tiffany Syancy. | ||
| She is an activist raising awareness about the critical threat of private equity and the threat it poses to American society. | ||
| She's raising the alarm and putting pressure on pro on private equity firms that are covertly monopolizing entire industries by using hostile takeovers and kangaroo courts. | ||
| We've been following her fight against uh private equity for it feels like I it feels like at least a year now, but maybe it's only been a few months. | ||
| You can follow her on X at the VenoMom or by going to TiffanySioncy.com. | ||
| Tiffany, thanks so much for coming on once again. | ||
| Good evening, Harrison. | ||
| Thanks for having me back. | ||
| How are you? | ||
| I'm doing uh very well. | ||
| How are you doing? | ||
| I, you know, another day fighting the fight. | ||
| That's you know, that's how it is. | ||
| Well, we we we make the joke, especially when you're here in studio. | ||
| You're you're this bubbly little fairy of doom, and you you come bringing warnings of the future. | ||
| So let's start on a good note. | ||
| Uh, you, of course, are very involved in and Maha and were very instrumental in sort of creating that coalition with Donald Trump and RFK Jr. | ||
| And you, you know, you're you're really on the forefront of that. | ||
| Uh RFK Jr. to me is the standout star of the Trump administration. | ||
| He has racked up victory after victory. | ||
| What is your takeaway of uh of what's happened with Tylenol and was it really about Tylenol? | ||
| It seemed to me like that was the cover, and really it was about vaccines. | ||
| Uh, but I I see this as a major step forward in the attempt to wrestle control of our health back from big pharmaceutical companies. | ||
| How do you think uh RFK Jr. and the Maha movement is doing these days? | ||
| I think RFK Jr. | ||
| Um has the absolute best of intentions, and I think that he wants to do a lot of work. | ||
| He's the head of the Maha Commission, which you and I talked about on my last um my last appearance on your show. | ||
| I do have personal concerns about the people they've put at the head of the EPA, that they're getting in the way of what he really wants to do. | ||
| And so I feel like there's this problem where we have these lobbyists for Chem Agra that have been put in charge of the EPA, and that it's directly undermining the work he was trying to do to remove toxic pesticides from our food supply. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Interesting. | |
| And so for me, I think that there's all this work that he's doing what he can and that he's working where he can, but that he's really got some roadblocks put up for him that are really um, I don't want to say like just undermining, but absolutely blocking the work he's trying to do. | ||
| Like we know that pesticides were really, really big uh thing for him. | ||
| He sued Bear Monsanto over and over and over again as a litigator on behalf of farmers that had gotten lymphoma. | ||
| And um, a lot of people don't know that, but farmers have the highest cancer rate in the United States of any profession. | ||
| Right. | ||
| You know that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And so I think that I worry that even though he he has these really amazing plans for making kids healthy again, right? | ||
| And we have all of these claims in the in the Maha Commission report about making sure kids have access to good food and access to um like healthy food and getting dyes out and getting chemicals out of our food supply, that without getting him more support. | ||
| I think we, our audience needs to help do that, getting him more support at the EPA and the USDA, I don't know how he's gonna get all of his goals achieved. | ||
| Well, and and the the public pressure has been super effective. | ||
| I mean, it seems like most of the announcements I've seen about corporations moving away from seed oils, moving away from artificial dyes, it's not happening because they're being forced to. | ||
| It's happening because they recognize it's a it's a boon to your market share. | ||
| I mean, people don't want that stuff. | ||
| And when you say, hey, we're we're using beef's tallow to fry our fries, you're gonna get more customers. | ||
| So really the public pressure campaign has been almost more effective than the actual people in authority at this point. | ||
| Yeah, I you know, it's amazing how when the free market's actually allowed to um to flex its muscles, it works, right? | ||
| And it's one of the reasons I'm such a big free market uh capitalist like uh advocate that's in favor of getting all of the crony out of our system, right? | ||
| Um, but it's hard to do in in instances of what we were just talking about, like pesticides. | ||
| Um, because right now we have states and really, in particular the American Legislative Exchange Council that are aiding Bear Monsanto and some other chem aggregate companies and trying to get uh and there's a lot of conservative creators that are actually really attacking this initiative. | ||
| They're trying to get pesticide immunity. | ||
| They've already achieved it in two states, and right now they're trying to sneak that into the spending bill to keep our government running in a month. | ||
| They're going to sneak in pesticide immunity so that when farmers get lymphoma in Iowa, they can't sue. | ||
| See, this is this is why I need you. | ||
| This is what this is why I I like when you come on, because it's like I already got so much stuff talked about. | ||
| I've I've totally missed this. | ||
| So lay lay this out for us. | ||
| The so they're going for pesticide immunity. | ||
| I don't know how I've missed this. | ||
| Okay, and that's gonna be in the next big spinning bill. | ||
| Yeah, one of one of Bobby Kennedy's uh biggest like promises he made was that he was going to get the most toxic pesticides, pesticides that are illegal in other countries around the world, most first world nations around the world, he was gonna get those out of our food supply. | ||
| He had successfully sued Bear Monsanto, securing the largest uh litigation award in American history at the time for injury um for farmers that had and and people that had used Roundup that had gotten lymphoma or leukemia. | ||
| And so this was a huge initiative that he talked about that most of America supported on the left and the right. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| And what ended up happening is he got to HHS and was the chair of the Maha Commission. | ||
| And in the first draft of the Maha Commission report that came out in I think it was May, uh, they talked about going hard after these really toxic pesticides. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And when I was on your show last time, that new leaked report of the final commission report had come out. | ||
| And in it, they had removed all mention of going after these very toxic pesticides. | ||
| And instead, the only mention of pesticides in that commission report coming from the EPA's chair was that they needed to spend millions of dollars on a new campaign to tell all of America how dumb we were because we didn't understand how good they were for us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| It was a new education campaign to teach us to understand how safe they were. | ||
| You know, it would be one thing if they were just going, all right, we're not gonna worry about pesticides right now. | ||
| We're doing all this other stuff, but that'll be on the back burner. | ||
| But it seems like they're if they're trying to give them immunity and trying to educate people about how little harm they cause, that's going in the opposite direction. | ||
| That's not it's not just that we're not progressing forward, we're actually going backwards here. | ||
| That that's uh that's very disappointing to hear, but not exactly surprising because that's the this the theme of the day, I guess, here is the really I mean, we've always known how how uh ubiquitous the this deep state is, but man, they cannot get anything done. | ||
| It's like every story of RFK talking about Tylenol or James Comey being indicted. | ||
| It's like you have to get through layer after layer after layer of these embedded operatives trying everything they can to subvert the will of the people. | ||
| It I mean, how do we deal with this problem when it seems like everybody, you know, RFK wants to do something that's very normal? | ||
| I mean, the studies about Tylenol have been out for years from Harvard, they're the highest level. | ||
| He still can't get it done because the people underneath them just don't want to. | ||
| I mean, how do you how do we even deal with this, Tiffany? | ||
| I mean, I always come back to saying that the way we do with it, the way we deal with it is one, we close the revolving door of lobbying to Congress to lobbying to regulatory uh like capture, right? | ||
| That would be one way to do it. | ||
| That's an initiative that 98% of the American population supports. | ||
| The problem is that statistically in America, when 98% of the American population supports an initiative, you've got less than 30% of a chance that it will ever pass in Congress. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| But when 70% of billionaires support an initiative, you've got an almost 90% chance it will pass in Congress. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And right now we have a bunch of billionaires that make a lot of money on these petroleum byproduct, chemical byproduct pesticides that have been sprayed all over. | ||
| And it's more than that too, because these same pesticides, this Roundup and these other pesticides are directly correlated to the Roundup Ready Corn, which is uh a GMO modified corn seed that Bear Monsanto has created a monopoly with, | ||
| making it so they literally go around and sue farmers if seeds from last from their neighbor that's around up ready corn blow onto their field and they can they they send people out to steal corn out of people's fields just to sue farmers into using their products so that they can hold and lock down their monopolies, right? | ||
| It takes us further away from regenerative farming, which is something that both sides really like recognize and support. | ||
| And and and it's manipulated. | ||
| All of the American population is regularly manipulated. | ||
| You know, we talk about supporting our American farmers. | ||
| We talk about supporting American farmers with things like the farm bill and subsidies. | ||
| Most people don't realize most of those subsidies, most of the loans that we give American farmers are tied to having to use pesticides because they're subsidized and that's advocated for by the chem aggro lobby, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So we have this really, really toxic, incestuous sort of merry-go-round we get on. | ||
| And no matter where you go, no matter where you try to get off, there's another plug pulling you to the next stop of like crony corruption. | ||
| The best way to stop this is to get money out of our politics. | ||
| The best way to stop this is to stop re-electing people that put money before their constituents. | ||
| The best way to stop this is to actually pass initiatives the American people want, like getting money and lobbying out of uh stop and also stopping insider trading because these same Congress members that are on these committees are also making money investing in Canada stocks, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And so there's there's so many things we could do if we could only get our politicians to do anything that actually serves us and and not billionaires. | ||
| Well, well, there you go. | ||
| You know, I try to start off with so with a with a victory with a win, and it's like, no, it's never that simple. | ||
| It's never that easy. | ||
| Well, you're exactly right. | ||
| And of course, it goes even deeper than that. | ||
| It's not just about the cancer, and it's not just about the monopolizing and the, you know, the greed that's driving it all. | ||
| It's the hormone disruption. | ||
| And God only knows how different our population would look and act if we hadn't been poisoned by atrazine or roundup or any of these things that feminize men and you know cause girls to go into uh early puberty. | ||
| I mean, it they have destroyed our our bodies over decades. | ||
| It's absolutely horrifying and needs to be dealt with. | ||
| There was recently a study done on dogs. | ||
| And I feel like they need to study this more, right? | ||
| There was a study done on dogs where they put dogs in polyester, like little wraps around their reproductive parts, right? | ||
| They they put them in like pants, essentially. | ||
| And there were polyester, which is which is a petroleum byproduct. | ||
| It's plastic, right? | ||
| Polyester is plastic. | ||
| Rayon is plastic. | ||
| And all of these are hormone disruptors, right? | ||
| Uh they're endocrine disruptors. | ||
| And dogs saw a 73% reduction in fertility after wearing these pants. | ||
| These are, these are what all of our Lulolemon is made out of. | ||
| This is what all of our athleisure is made out of that women are wearing. | ||
| And we see all this huge rise in fertility issues. | ||
| Well, we should be studying those things. | ||
| But we also need to get chemicals out of our, we need to stop letting chemicals make us more and more sick every single day. | ||
| And I I think we should be studying that in humans. | ||
| We should be studying chemicals in our food supply. | ||
| We should be studying pesticides in our food supply. | ||
| We should also be studying, you know, how much money is pouring from these organizations to our politicians to get them to keep them in our supply. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| And and it's, I mean, it is practically impossible. | ||
| I mean, you you can you can really do a lot to mitigate your exposure, but it it's so ubiquitous. | ||
| I mean, it's everywhere. | ||
| It's in the food, it's in the water, it's in the air, it's on the ground. | ||
| I mean, it's in the dust. | ||
| It's everywhere, but you can still, you know, do what you can. | ||
| It's just, it's just very hard. | ||
| My it's like a full-time job for my wife. | ||
| She's like looking for cotton clothes and she's looking for, you know, food that's not poisoned. | ||
| And like it almost has to be a full-time job because uh it's so difficult. | ||
| But and it's on top of that, you know it's on purpose because with things like Roundup, tell me if I'm wrong. | ||
| Didn't Monsanto have like a black ops division that went after journalists who were covering this stuff? | ||
| So it's not like they aren't aware of the problem they're causing. | ||
| They're so aware of it, they're sending out black ops teams to cover it up and they're lobbying so that the, you know, they're not obligated to go, you know, to study the consequences of their program. | ||
| So they know what they're doing and they're working hard to cover up the negative consequences. | ||
| So again, I always point to the Alex Jones, you know, meme where he says they're putting chemicals in the water to turn the frogs gay. | ||
| It's like, yeah, it sounds crazy because it sounds like they're doing it on purpose. | ||
| But you then you look in and no, they are doing it on purpose. | ||
| They know exactly what it does, and they're working to conceal that so they can keep doing it. | ||
| It's on purpose, isn't it? | ||
| Well, the shareholders of Bear Monsanto and the board members are the same board members and shareholders that are in charge of our pharmaceutical companies, right? | ||
| And when BlackRock is is the largest shareholder in every one of these companies, when when Chem Agra is doing well, Pharma is also doing well, and then also fertility is doing well, and then you see, right? | ||
| Another thing that we could do um systematically is we could like really push our politicians to revamp and update our antitrust laws. | ||
| Uh, because right now we have an FTC and a DOJ that are not being able to effectively deploy antitrust mechanisms against these giant monopolies, right? | ||
| When Bear Monsanto has a monopoly on the seed supply of not just our country, but dozens of countries. | ||
| That that also means we lack food autonomy. | ||
| If we can't, like right now, if you go and buy a watermelon at the grocery store, it's gonna be infertile. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Because they've got such a grip on our food supply that they've made it so that the food that's in all of our grocery stores is GMO. | ||
| And that GMO food is infertile, so you can't plant the seeds because you have to buy their seeds, right? | ||
| And their seeds are infertile, so you have to buy them every time you want to plant, they don't reproduce. | ||
| They've made it illegal for farmers to keep seeds from season to season and replant their own crops, right? | ||
| And so we could break up that monopoly. | ||
| Um, but when we see how monopolies are being litigated right now in the United States, a really good example would be Amazon. | ||
| Amazon had a monopoly case that started the trial started this week. | ||
| And that case was about defrauding customers into signing up for Amazon Prime, right? | ||
| And Amazon, Amazon brings in like $800 billion in revenue, right? | ||
| In just our region. | ||
| Um, they settled it yesterday. | ||
| There were all these headlines that it was this huge win for the administration that they had just settled this case against Amazon for 2.5 billion dollars, the largest settlement ever in FTC history. | ||
| One billion was going to go to the government and 1.5 billion was gonna go to the victims. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Do you know what that represents of Amazon's revenue? | ||
| Yeah, nothing. | ||
| Oh, how does it compare to the money they made? | ||
| Zero, three, nine percent of their revenue for one year. | ||
| I bet they're regretting it now, Tiffany. | ||
| They're really shaking in their business. | ||
| For being a monopoly, why would any be anything but a monopoly? | ||
| It cost them less to settle it than the legal fees would have been to do the case. | ||
| This was a cost of doing business, and now they get to stay a monopoly, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| So we need to need to improve our monopoly enforcement laws so that we can have real free market competition and start having challengers in our marketplace across every single um facet of the American economy. | ||
| And just with Amazon, especially. | ||
| It's like you you you people are printing money. | ||
| Everybody does everything through Amazon. | ||
| Can you not let people just cancel their prime when they want to? | ||
| Is it really that big of a thing? | ||
| It's like why they have to squeeze every little penny out of you. | ||
| And it reminds me of, you know, I was a part of the Wells Fargo settlement, you know, a couple decades ago where they were, you know, inaccurately charging people overdraft fees. | ||
| Now, Every time I overdrafted, it cost me 20 or 30 bucks or whatever it was. | ||
| And I remember getting a check in the mail from Wells Fargo for $4.32. | ||
| Gee, thanks. | ||
| So they'll give me one-fifth of one of the times they overdrafted me. | ||
| Their consequence of that is so it's like, yeah, it actually is smart business to, you know, rob people and screw them out of their money because the government comes in and makes you pay a fifth of a percent, and uh you just continue on your merry way. | ||
| It really is sick. | ||
| Uh but is it possible to, I mean, is it possible to break up Amazon? | ||
| Is it possible to uh, you know, sue them for an amount that would actually damage them? | ||
| Like, you know, what is these companies are so big? | ||
| I mean, what do we even do at this point? | ||
| So it's absolutely possible legally to break up any one of these monopolies. | ||
| The problem is we're not doing it. | ||
| And we also have a judiciary that has gotten very comfortable serving big business interests. | ||
| And I'm just gonna say that it's it's not easy of me to say that as you know, my husband's a federal attorney. | ||
| And we believed uh with our whole heart in the uh exceptionalism of the American judicial system, uh, just through like four or five years ago. | ||
| Uh we don't have that same confidence these days. | ||
| Um, in this instance, what I would say is right now in America, you only get the justice you can afford. | ||
| We have a two-tier justice system that is serving the elites very, very well, and it serves the American public not at all. | ||
| Uh our antitrust laws were designed to break up companies in this circumstance, in these circumstances where we have massive monopolies. | ||
| And instead, we're approving ever increasing monopolies being created, right? | ||
| So, right now, if you look around the United States, we're watching that Larry Ellison, the CEO of Oracle, one of the top five wealthiest individuals in the world. | ||
| Last week he was the wealthiest person in the world for like three days. | ||
| Um he just got approved to buy Paramounts Sky Dance, and now he's trying to buy Warner Brothers. | ||
| Simultaneously, he just got Trump to give him TikTok, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| And so he's built this new monopoly. | ||
| And we're just approving these things at the FCC. | ||
| Well, I don't think Jimmy Kimmel off the air was worth that train, frankly. | ||
| I just don't. | ||
| All right. | ||
| I don't, I don't think these mergers were worth those trades. | ||
| Uh no, he's back on. | ||
| He's back on. | ||
| What I'm saying is I don't think that the FCC coming out and making a statement that, you know, they would be more satiated if they got what they wanted, is what we should be doing. | ||
| What we should be doing is demanding our FCC, our FTC, and our DOJ defend American capitalism. | ||
| And that requires competition. | ||
| And what we have right now are monopolies in every single area of American life. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| We need to break up monopolies. | ||
| We did it in the 1920s or the 1930s, after we had the massive stock market crash at the end of the 1920s. | ||
| We did it aggressively. | ||
| We did it with rigor. | ||
| We did it in a way that that from that moment forward built the most robust middle class expansion in world history. | ||
| Right. | ||
| And we have lost sight of that, and we need to get back to it immediately. | ||
| Now we just had a chance. | ||
| We just had a chance to break up Google. | ||
| Google lost their antitrust case. | ||
| The FTC and the DOJ sued them. | ||
| They lost it. | ||
| They lost their case. | ||
| And the FTC and the DOJ from the Biden administration got to finish that case. | ||
| And it was argued that they wanted them to be forced to divest of Chrome, that they had to agree to stop making sweetheart deals with Apple with Android, which is theirs, but in a subsidiary, right? | ||
| With um computer systems so that they weren't the default search engine. | ||
| They were gonna ask them to stop making sweetheart deals to give better advertising rates to big corporations instead of small businesses, which as you know is something near and dear to my heart. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| And the judge decided not to enforce any of it. | ||
| He made his ruling, he didn't make them divest of anything. | ||
| He fined them, a cost of doing business. | ||
| He let them retain ownership, and he just said, no more naughty deals, guys. | ||
| Do better. | ||
| We had it. | ||
| We were there, and he flinched. | ||
| He had the chance to start ushering in a new era of antitrust that could actually restore competition to our marketplace. | ||
| And he flinched. | ||
| And we we desperately We desperately need that now because, you know, one of my biggest gripes, especially with the Republicans is their unwillingness to even entertain the idea that the economy isn't working for the average person. | ||
| It's just just it's so bizarre, but they have this reflexive, I must defend capitalism. | ||
| No, you're destroying capitalism by allowing these monopolies to exist. | ||
| And you're opening up this massive uh vulnerability that the socialists and the communists are gonna come in, they're gonna demonize capitalism, and the young people are gonna believe it. | ||
| It is not, you know, uh communistic to break up monopolies. | ||
| It is one of the most American things you can do. | ||
| We have so much precedent for this. | ||
| It actually enforces capitalism. | ||
| It reinforces and upholds capitalism. | ||
| I mean, if you can't, you can't get more American than Teddy Roosevelt, right? | ||
| And this is one of the things that he was known for. | ||
| He was the trustbuster. | ||
| We need to reclaim that and not be under the slavery of, you know, this crony capitalism, this monopolistic capitalism. | ||
| It seems obvious to me, but nobody on the right seems to be making that argument. | ||
| You know, there are people on the right that do support it. | ||
| We see it regularly from Josh Hawley. | ||
| Uh he was a very big supporter. | ||
| JD Vance at the beginning, right before he took office, said that he believed that Lena Khan, which was the former chairwoman of the FTC, uh, that she was the one thing that Biden did right and we needed her to do more. | ||
| He's an attorney, right? | ||
| We see Josh Hawley talking about antitrust and asking hard questions pretty regularly. | ||
| The problem is they are an extreme minority. | ||
| And if if President Trump wants to keep any of the populist gains he's made, especially with the youth, he needs to start serving the youth of America, the working class of America, the union workers of America, and that requires competition. | ||
| It requires breaking up these monopolies, and it requires it, it requires them to make it so that small businesses can start accessing competition in America again. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. | ||
| And uh that is completely at odds with the plan of the globalists who always want concentration. | ||
| They always want centralization. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Tiffany Sioncy is my guest. | ||
| Follow her on X at the VenoMom website, TiffanySioncy.com. | ||
| Of course, taking on uh private equity and monopolization, just as uh as a sort of capstone to uh our previous topic. | ||
| We've got this, uh, and this this tells you why monopolies are so important. | ||
| Parlor app has now been booted by Amazon, Apple, and Google. | ||
| This was uh four days after January 6th. | ||
| Uh Google removed them from their store, Apple removed them from their store, and then Amazon removed them from the internet. | ||
| It was not allowing them to host their website. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Well, they said there were posts that clearly encourage and incite violence. | ||
| 98 examples. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Well, I could find 98 examples an hour on Reddit. | ||
| I could find, I mean, and there are entire apps just to encourage and facilitate violence against ICE agents. | ||
| I say there's no place for platform on our platform for threats of violence and illegal activity, says Apple, the iPhone maker, as they kick Parlor off because some people who were they on there on January 6th happened to use it as a social media platform, cut to today, you know, uh whatever it is, four years later, Apple and Google will not suspend ice tracking apps used by shooter. | ||
| So this guy that killed two people and attacked an ice facility, used one of these apps, and Apple and Google says, yeah, that's fine. | ||
| So it's just it's completely arbitrary. | ||
| It's obviously political what they choose to allow on and what they don't. | ||
| And that's what happens when you have a monopoly. | ||
| Parlor basically went the way of the dodo. | ||
| They were they're kicked off the internet. | ||
| Amazon wouldn't host them, Google wouldn't host them, Apple wouldn't host them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why? | |
| Because January 6th happened and people used parlor that were there. | ||
| I mean, it's just absurd. | ||
| So, Tiffany, that's the, you know, that's the reason they want the monopoly because it gives them control. | ||
| It's pretty simple. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. | |
| Absolutely. | ||
| I uh I I really do believe that there's a path forward to breaking up monopolies. | ||
| And I like to remind people that in the United States, we have 18 states that are what are known as referendum states. | ||
| Referendum states are states where you can circumvent corruption to make a change all by yourself. | ||
| There are 18 states in these United States where a regular citizen can write a law, they can take take it down to their state house, they can file it, and then they can go collect maybe it's 5,000 signatures, maybe it's 10,000 signatures. | ||
| I know Arizona has a really high bar, but Nevada, it's just like 10,000 signatures. | ||
| You can get some friends together and go collect them in like a month, right? | ||
| And that law goes on the ballot. | ||
| And the American people get to vote in your state. | ||
| If enough states pass some of these laws, it would be able to begin to influence some of these changes, right? | ||
| Um, I like to remind people also that antitrust laws are the only laws in the United States that have uh a civil and a criminal component that were considered so integral to the success, the long-term safety and success of the American economy that all regular Americans are allowed to bring antitrust cases. | ||
| So if we got together, let's say a million Americans got together and we each threw in a few dollars, we could absolutely hire a law firm to bring an antitrust case against any one of these monopolies all by ourselves. | ||
| We can do that. | ||
| We can activate. | ||
| It's hard, but it can be done. | ||
| It's worth it. | ||
| It would absolutely be worth it. | ||
| I I think we should look towards something like that. | ||
| Uh Obviously, whatever we can be doing to move things forward. | ||
| I know a lot of us have lost trust in uh and it's not even necessarily like RFK Jr. | ||
| If RFK Jr. isn't the real deal, then nobody is. | ||
| I mean, this man has is spit, they killed his dad, they killed his uncle. | ||
| He has been on a war path in a crusade, totally just like one alignment. | ||
| He's never, you know, varied. | ||
| He's he's anti or he's just he's pro health and he wants our kids to be healthy. | ||
| And it's like his whole life is evidence of that. | ||
| And then I see people online going, nah, he's just a fake. | ||
| And it's like, we gotta bul they're human beings. | ||
| We gotta believe at least some of them have the right intentions. | ||
| But whether or not, you know, they're they're trying their hardest or just pretending they are, and which is the case in some cases, it's clearly just it's not happening at the federal level in the way that we want. | ||
| And it doesn't seem like it matters how much we vote. | ||
| Not to give up on voting, but like, man, if if we can just do petitions ourselves and get things changed ourselves, I do think that's the path forward. | ||
| I I absolutely agree with you. | ||
| And I think that I think that America's ready to just start taking things into their own hands. | ||
| I I feel like we've had 30 years consecutively of having the exact same fiscal policy and the exact same foreign policy in service exclusively of billionaires, no matter who we elect. | ||
| It does not matter who we elect, we get the same foreign and fiscal policy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| And that is a byproduct of everyone in Congress being captured. | ||
| And I think the American public is ready to start taking steps to just take things into their own hands. | ||
| And at this moment, I have to say, like at this moment, I believe that there are positive ways forward and really scary negative ways forward. | ||
| And referendum laws, that's a positive way forward. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| Anything that actually supports our republic and use of our republic and and the mechanisms that allow us to make a difference without resorting to uh the more extreme ways of making a difference. | ||
| I support that. | ||
| And I think we need to. | ||
| Here, here, I I completely agree. | ||
| And uh obviously I think a lot of people are feeling that way as well. | ||
| And it, you know, it's sort of like this is this is the government's last chance. | ||
| It's not our last chance. | ||
| This is the government's last chance to work for us, and then we'll, you know, continue or maybe start supporting it. | ||
| Uh, but man, if they keep going down the path they're going down, things are gonna get bad. | ||
| They they really are. | ||
| Okay, you mentioned it earlier. | ||
| You mentioned him earlier, Larry Ellison. | ||
| This is one of these things that's just been quietly happening in the background. | ||
| We, of course, have been sounding alarms about this from even before Project Stargate, but it was, you know, very early on in Trump's administration that he announced Project Stargate, which was this $500 million investment. | ||
| And at the time, people were saying, why are we giving this money? | ||
| And it's like, no, the money's actually coming from the corporation, but it's still bad, it's still not what we want. | ||
| And it's still centered around this guy, Larry Ellison, who I've been talking about forever because he was integral in the coup that happened at OpenAI, where the, if you remember that whole saga, it was really strange. | ||
| The board saw something, and we I we still don't have answers, but they're like, we saw something that scared us. | ||
| So we like remove Sam Altman immediately. | ||
| We cannot trust this guy. | ||
| Then there was like this counter coup where the whole board was fired. | ||
| Sam Altman was brought back, and Larry Ellison was, you know, placed as the as the kingpin or, you know, gained power through this and has a lot of influence on open AI. | ||
| That was last year or the year before. | ||
| It may have been 2023. | ||
| But since then, he has he's buying CBS or his son is, he's buying Warner Brothers. | ||
| He's now taking over TikTok. | ||
| I mean, this guy is making, you talk about monopoly. | ||
| I mean, this is one man who apparently now owns every major media outlet in the country, more or less. | ||
| I mean, what do you know about this? | ||
| And and you know, what's happening behind the scenes? | ||
| Sounds like they're they're quietly just consolidating power in this uh Larry Ellison figure, who by the way, ran Oracle, which got its start in the CIA. | ||
| He was made a billionaire by the CIA. | ||
| He is pure CIA. | ||
| So the CIA is capturing all of these media outlets. | ||
| What does that mean for us, Tiffany? | ||
| Uh, I'm gonna, I'm gonna take an Ian Carroll moment here, and I'm just gonna say uh when you look at what he's consolidating, he's always been very pro-surveillance. | ||
| He's always offered surveillance as the answer to all of our government's problems, which is terrifying to me uh as an American that is a First Amendment first and a strong believer in the right to privacy. | ||
| Um, he has always offered surveillance as a solution to every problem in the United States. | ||
| He expanded his wealth immensely under the Patriot Act, which is a huge problem for me for obvious reasons, right? | ||
| Um, but when you look at what he's acquiring, he's already got all of the surveillance. | ||
| He already has all the data. | ||
| TikTok is just another consolidation of that acquisition of data, right? | ||
| But what he's acquiring right now is a monopoly of propaganda. | ||
| Right. | ||
| When you own all of these channels that can disseminate any message you want, and you also have the mechanism through something like TikTok to see what we're thinking and what we're talking about, and you can get real-time metrics on how we're being manipulated. | ||
| To me, what I see is a monopoly of propaganda. | ||
| And that is terrifying. | ||
| That's what I see. | ||
| I I see the same thing. | ||
| I think you know, I I led all of the protests in DC to save TikTok. | ||
| I believe TikTok is an absolutely essential mechanism in the US. | ||
| I know a lot of people don't agree with me on that. | ||
| 7.1 million small businesses rely on TikTok for all of their success. | ||
| They will cease to exist if it's not here. | ||
| But I've said for months, saving it is not enough. | ||
| It matters how we save it. | ||
| Are we preserving free speech? | ||
| Are we preserving the financial um the financial incentives it offers creators and small businesses? | ||
| Or are we about to consolidate power, create new mechanisms for surveillance? | ||
| How we save it matters. | ||
| And right now, what they're talking about creating an America only app, most people don't know this. | ||
| We represent only 9% of TikTok users worldwide, but we represent 36% of the consumed content worldwide. | ||
| So what that means is that for if we're suddenly cut off from the world, more than two-thirds of our viewers disappear, which means all of the creators that rely on TikTok for their financial well-being will lose their income because more than two-thirds of their viewers will no longer be here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Right. | ||
| If we manage to stay connected to the rest of the world, it's going to be through a filter of propaganda. | ||
| Now, I believe we need to reinstate the parameters that came down with Smith Mund. | ||
| I do not believe our government should be allowed to propagandize American citizens. | ||
| I think that most Americans agree with that. | ||
| We do not want to be propagandized by our government. | ||
| When we have an actor like Ellison, who has built his entire net worth on serving the CIA through surveillance, and he is now buying up one of the most influential ways that that young Americans could be influenced. | ||
| I have, I have concerns, huge concerns. | ||
| And again, monopolies are not good. | ||
| We need monopolies are bad. | ||
| And if he's created a monopoly, I don't approve. | ||
| I just don't approve. | ||
| I don't. | ||
| And what bothers me the most, it was other monopolists that enabled this. | ||
| He was integral to getting the bill passed to ban TikTok because he was quietly preparing for this. | ||
| Between he and Meta, they funded almost the entire thing, spending over 60 million dollars lobbying Congress to ban TikTok. | ||
| Right? | ||
| Because he knew we would end up right here. | ||
| And that is very concerning to me. | ||
| I don't, I don't, I know there's no coincidence, and I don't approve of monopolies expanding their power. | ||
| I don't approve of a government or or a monopolist propagandizing America. | ||
| And I don't agree with the surveillance state. | ||
| I I completely agree with all of that. | ||
| I also don't think that the reasons that they say are the real reasons are pursuing some of these goals. | ||
| Uh and they they'll always come up with an excuse with TikTok. | ||
| It's well, it's China and China's propagandizing us or China's making our algorithms bad, or you know, China, China, China. | ||
| In reality, I think it's pretty clear it's about anti-Semitism, it's about Israel and it's about the, you know, way that that these ideas have spread on TikTok, uh, considering the fact they kept bringing it up. | ||
| I'm sure you remember during the uh presidential debate. | ||
| I think it was Nikki Haley who said, every 10 minutes you spend on TikTok, you become 30% more anti-Semitic, or whatever this number is she she pulled out of her butt. | ||
| I mean, it was just completely ridiculous. | ||
| But obviously that that has been the driving force. | ||
| Uh Trump tried to take out TikTok in his first administration. | ||
| Nobody wanted anything to do with that, you know, policy and didn't really care. | ||
| But after uh October 7th and the following, you know, the genocide by Israel, this has been a major thorn in their side, and that's what's been uh, you know, motivating a lot of this. | ||
| So I'm I'm very concerned at that. | ||
| And we know that, you know, uh TikTok just put in a literal like unit 8200 IDF Israeli psyop commander is now in charge of censorship on TikTok. | ||
| Uh, I mean, how much do you think that's gonna change TikTok? | ||
| Is it noticeable? | ||
| I, you know, I don't really like TikTok. | ||
| I'll be perfectly square. | ||
| I I find it a very disturbing, but every time I go on, I just I get a bad feeling. | ||
| But I get it, people love it, and I do understand its value, and I and I respect the uh influence it's had in this country. | ||
| And I love that it's a place where people can smart uh start small businesses. | ||
| I think that's a very important point that I've only ever heard you bring up, but it's it's obviously very true. | ||
| I mean, the entire economy depends on this site. | ||
| you have to take that into account. | ||
| So, I mean, what what do you think TikTok's doing moving forward? | ||
| So, what I can say, I just had this exact conversation actually with Ian Carroll, is um that right now, what we've all heard the leaked audio of the head of APAC saying that they had a TikTok problem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| And that they had to regain control of the young people of America. | ||
| It's the eighth. | ||
| And TikTok is certainly the place where we've had the most success exposing what's happening in Gaza, right? | ||
| We've had the most success doing that on TikTok. | ||
| And everybody is very, very worried that that's going to change with the new ownership. | ||
| What I can tell you is if it does, it would be so blatant and so obvious that that TikTok would cease to be valuable because the young people will absolutely just leave. | ||
| It backfire. | ||
| They're awake. | ||
| They're very, very awake. | ||
| It will backfire in spectacular fashion. | ||
| Here's what I worry about, in addition to them propagandizing us through TikTok, right? | ||
| And we are seeing that uh already. | ||
| We see a lot of TikTokers that are being sent on paid trips to Israel to talk about how no one is starving, and that all of the all of the videos coming from from Australian nurses and and UK doctors there are just propaganda. | ||
| Um, but what we're seeing, and what worries me an awful lot is that the TikTok was the one place small businesses could succeed and break free from the monopoly that Google and Meta have on them as a stranglehold. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Meta and Google both make 98 and 99% of their revenue from advertising and almost all of that from small businesses. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| They're monopolists and they monopolize the cost of small businesses doing business. | ||
| And as a result, small businesses went to TikTok where anyone could go viral and you didn't have to pay to play. | ||
| Over on Meta, their algorithm is designed to stop small businesses from organically growing. | ||
| Instead, what happens is you get there and you're you're posting a video that got a million views on TikTok over on Meta, and you get 100. | ||
| You're like, why? | ||
| And then suddenly they'll offer you a promotion and then they'll offer you another one, and people are seeing your videos, but only if you're paying to play. | ||
| And you're being vetted and pitted against uh like like Walmart, which buys 60 million ads a month, and they get a price that's three quarters less than you because they can negotiate it for it. | ||
| You don't get to negotiate. | ||
| So small businesses are iced out of making money unless they pay monopolist rates on Google and Meta. | ||
| Whereas over on TikTok, anyone could go viral. | ||
| You did not have to pay to do it, and you could succeed. | ||
| And that is why 7.1 million small businesses have so successfully done that. | ||
| What I worry about now is that Ellison owns a ton of stock in Meta and Google too. | ||
| And so does BlackRock, right? | ||
| Right. | ||
| They want every small business. | ||
| They don't want small businesses, they want monopolies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| And so I worry that TikTok is about to become a place that is no longer friendly to small businesses. | ||
| I worry that they're going to start using it as a pay-to-play environment. | ||
| And when they do that, it'll be ruined for the small businesses I fought to save it for. | ||
| So the way we save it matters. | ||
| And we have a very awake population on TikTok, very awake. | ||
| And if they sense for even a second that it's changed, they're just gonna leave. | ||
| They're just going to leave, and then it'll be worthless. | ||
| And all of this will have been for nothing. | ||
| Yeah, and uh, and you know, hey, the good news is it's uh it's an opportunity for somebody to make a TikTok clone that's not censored, and uh that would be hugely successful. | ||
| So I'm sure people are working on that. | ||
| Again, these are the headlines just from like the the last week or so. | ||
| Larry Ellison is the shadow president in Trump's America. | ||
| Meet the Ellisons, America's new Rockefellers, which might be more apro than they even realize. | ||
| Larry Ellison is quickly becoming the biggest media magnate in America. | ||
| Larry Ellison's heir uh takes aim at Warner Brothers and reshaping Hollywood. | ||
| The CIA made Larry Ellison a billionaire, in case you were wondering. | ||
| And then this is from uh WikiLeaks. | ||
| They say isra Israeli aligned billionaire sees TikTok in battle for U.S. narrative control. | ||
| The White House has announced that the forced sale of TikTok will be finalized this week. | ||
| The new ownership led by Larry Ellison, the largest individual donor to the IDF, will take control of the U.S. user data and algorithm, which the White House says will be retrained. | ||
| Ellison, who made his fortune developing Oracle, a database system originally built for the CIA, already controls CBS, Paramount, MTV, Comedy Central, Showtime, Nickelodeon, as well as Channel 10 in Australia, Channel 5 in the UK. | ||
| Ellison's also expected to finalize control over Warner Brothers Discovery, including CNN, HBO, and the Discovery Channel before the end of 2025. | ||
| Uh, And it goes on. | ||
| But I mean, already, I mean, that is an immense amount of power uh in one man or one organization. | ||
| And of course, he runs it with his family, uh, as all of these, you know, uh billionaires seem to do. | ||
| I'm thinking of George Soros passing down, you know, operation of his of the Open Society Foundation to his son. | ||
| They tend not to really be so meritocratic when it comes to uh, you know, their own operations, but they want all of us to be. | ||
| Uh I mean, this is the this is crazy. | ||
| Do you think this is because he's CIA aligned and this is just the CIA using him as a front, or is he just this powerful and and uh I don't know, uh clever to gain this much power to himself. | ||
| No, absolute power corrupts absolutely, right? | ||
| I believe that like every member of Congress that's on their deathbed still having their aids help them vote that once you're on that power train and you want that power and you need that power, and you make the trade-offs for integrity in your soul that you give for that power, becomes increasingly difficult to let it go. | ||
| And that you would literally, like we can look at folks like like Mitch McConnell, Diane Feinstein, and Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| Diane Feinstein was in a wheelchair on the Senate floor or on the on the Congress floor, right? | ||
| And she didn't know she was voting. | ||
| And her aides were saying, say I. And she says, I what? | ||
| And they said, say I. And she didn't know where she was, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Same thing with Biden, right? | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Right? | ||
| All of the when we see the the way that power corrupts absolutely, we have to acknowledge that, and there have been several studies that show that for the most part, people in the levels of power that we're talking about right now, whether it be an AI CEO or a tech CEO or a chem agra CEO, these people become literally sociopathic. | ||
| They believe they are suddenly the answer to society's problems. | ||
| They have the only answers, and they have to believe it. | ||
| Because otherwise, every life they destroyed on the way to where they are was for naught, right? | ||
| So they convince themselves that they're the only answer to the problems of society, and that every sacrifice, every trade-off, every lapse of integrity, every person they step on or harm is worth it. | ||
| And that is terrifying. | ||
| And that is what our antitrust laws are for. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| That is why we have them is because this is dangerous for a society. | ||
| It's dangerous for an economy. | ||
| It is dangerous for civilization, and we need to have guardrails on our system to stop the human condition that always sees. | ||
| I mean, we're evolutionary designed to seek power and to seek more, right? | ||
| That's what we're built for. | ||
| When you have more, you preserve your lineage. | ||
| They have enough. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right. | |
| I don't want to be one of those capitalists that's like divest the billionaires. | ||
| But if they're getting it unethically through illegal monopolistic practices, we have parameters for that, and we need to use them. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| We need to use them. | ||
| Because small businesses are actually the backbone of this economy. | ||
| Small businesses create 99.9% of the jobs and have 24 years running. | ||
| 99.9% of all jobs created in the United States were created by small businesses. | ||
| While giant corporations have eliminated almost all of the jobs that have been eliminated in our economy 24 years running. | ||
| Because they create efficiency. | ||
| They they offshore them. | ||
| They send them other places to get more and more money in power. | ||
| We need to start protecting small businesses. | ||
| We need to protect our economy. | ||
| We need to start using any trust. | ||
| And we need to protect our our our minds, right? | ||
| Right now, we're about to be propagandized in ways we've never even conceived of with the changes that are coming technologically. | ||
| Well, yeah. | ||
| We've got to start creating protections for our young people, for our peace of mind against propaganda, and to ensure that we have an economy that is not monopolized. | ||
| One 100%. | ||
| And again, you're you're exactly right. | ||
| It's just, it's just human nature. | ||
| It's like you can't, you almost can't even blame these people for doing it. | ||
| It's it's our fault for letting them. | ||
| I mean, you know, it's our fault for letting the rabid dog off the leash. | ||
| Well, why do we ever let him off the leash in the first place? | ||
| Uh so I completely agree. | ||
| And even just like on the surface of it, hey, if l if uh, you know, Larry Ellison is just he's just a genius and he's just really good at knowing the market and he's doing even so, it's like, okay, that's still bad because we don't want the monopoly, that much power in one, it's just it's it's anathema to our sensibilities as Americans. | ||
| It shouldn't be allowed. | ||
| But then on top of that, you've got this foreign influence element that I think is is it's obviously what's motivating this. | ||
| It's not he's not just driven by power. | ||
| It's not just about wanting money and wanting to accrue all this stuff. | ||
| Clearly, the drive comes from this is the eighth front in our existential war. | ||
| Uh the youth are are moving away from Israel. | ||
| I keep talking about, I mean, they're they're walking out of the UN. | ||
| The EU is not selling weapons to them anymore. | ||
| They're recognizing Palestine all over the world. | ||
| I mean, they are in crisis mode right now, and they see that the control over the messaging is really, you know, what they need now. | ||
| And so again, from from WikiLeaks, they uh they say the the U.S. still has three years of Trump left. | ||
| Israeli aligned Jewish billionaires control OpenAI, Google, Meta, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, Palantir, CBS, HBO, most of Conde NAS, which is Reddit Vogue, the New Yorker, Wire GQ Vanity Uh Fair, as well as numerous Hollywood studios, regional papers, and radio stations. | ||
| I mean, it goes on and on. | ||
| But the idea is that that these platforms are being captured purposefully to progress the agenda of a foreign state that is not America, that does not have our best interest in mind. | ||
| And uh, why are we allowing this as Americans if this is so clearly motivated by by a foreign power? | ||
| Unfortunately, uh, I think that the young people have really done uh us a huge service in really pushing back against this as the first generation to do so in a very long time. | ||
| What we are seeing right now is is the youth of America are leading the charge and exposing the corruption that's captured our Congress for far too long, right? | ||
| From 2010 forward and really from going back to JFK when we did not make APAC register uh under Farah. | ||
| We we've seen capture increasingly uh of our entire um legislative branch and much of our executive branch. | ||
| And when we look and you you look and wonder how they've been able to acquire that much power, you just need to look at how much they they've taken, right? | ||
| President Trump received 230 million dollars from APAC aligned donors to date. | ||
| 230 million dollars. | ||
| That's an awful lot of money for a man that said he didn't need to take big donations and all of his donations were coming in small, right? | ||
| Mary Mattelson alone gave almost 100 million, I believe. | ||
| And so when you look at the amount of capture they've been able to acquire just through brute force and money, we we have to ask ourselves how can you be America first if you're Israel first, right? | ||
| If the American people remember I said when 98% of America opposes or supports something, you have an almost zero chance of them actually doing what you want. | ||
| But when billionaires support it, it's gonna get through. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money when we're at war. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money through technological surveillance. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money when we stay sick. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money when we get sick. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money through monopolistic control of our food supply. | ||
| Billionaires make a lot of money doing a lot of things, but the American people, they demand more. | ||
| And this this next generation, they're gonna lead that charge. | ||
| We're coming up on the first elections where people are paying attention to that in a very long time, really going back until like 1996 when Ross Perot ran. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| We really haven't had any attention paid to this in that length of time. | ||
| And it's going to change things. | ||
| And it's gonna be through through uh, I think people are gonna be surprised the role it plays in the coming elections. | ||
| And I think it's essential. | ||
| I agree. | ||
| And and you know, as I uh there's videos of a woman interviewing a a uh, I think a congressional candidate, and she's pressuring him and going, are you gonna take APAC money? | ||
| And he's waffling and he won't really say one way or the other. | ||
| And she goes, You have no idea how popular you'll be if you don't take APAC money. | ||
| I mean, the these uh manipulations, these these methods of control require secrecy. | ||
| Once that shattered, once the people assert their will, we'll we'll get our country back. | ||
| We'll actually get our country back. | ||
| Tiffany Sionti, thank you so much for being with us. | ||
| tiffanycianzi.com at thevetomomonx. | ||
| We'll see you next time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ah! | |
| Ah! | ||
| Feel the unstoppable power of Alex Jones, fueled by ultimate creatine powder. | ||
| This is the secret weapon behind his relentless energy. | ||
| *Screams* | ||
| Creatine monohydrate ignites his muscles, blasting through lifts and sprints with raw warrior strength, building the physique of a true patriot. | ||
| Aaaaaah! | ||
| With micronized mixability, Alex dominates every day, recovering like a titan to crush fatigue and soar to new heights of performance. | ||
| *Screams* | ||
| His mind becomes a fortress, sharper focus, unbreakable memory, powered by creatine to outlast any mental Battle. | ||
| This new tropic powerhouse defends against fatigue, keeping Alex Jones razor sharp for the fight. | ||
| Join him and at least your inner strengths. | ||
| Grab Ultimate Creatine Powder now at the Alex Jones Store.com. | ||
| fuel your fight and rise with alex jones today That's pure gold. | ||
| I'd have in between, like maybe the creatine zooming in a little. | ||
| It's coming towards you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Um also it's just 30 seconds left. | |
| You can have me go backa chuck a woom bot quank quak. | ||
| You know that little like a monka bug. | ||
| I'll be really good. | ||
|
unidentified
|
*music* | |
| I was not trying to do the product placement thing here where it wrecked his 23rd birthday. | ||
| And with my dad and mother, dad were so proud of you. | ||
| Great job, the surgeons. | ||
| Thanks for all your prayers for that. | ||
| But mom, you were literally without me soliciting. | ||
| You've been on colostrum now two months. | ||
| And we have the very best at the ultimate shore.com. | ||
| And I'm serious, I didn't bring this up. | ||
| I don't ever do testimonials. | ||
| I have been on that colostrum for about two or three months, and a back problem that I've had since Alex was born. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's almost completely gone after 50, however many years. | |
| And my hair is much thicker than it has been, and I have I have good hair anyway, but it's much thicker. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And this is brand new. | |
| Turned darker and darker. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Beautiful. | |
| So so who wasn't who's gonna vent you to take it? | ||
| Steve Heimbergers away. | ||
| It was uh Mary Heimberg. | ||
| Yeah, no, they're really smart little listeners. | ||
| So, so Mom, do you gotta listen? | ||
| The products are amazing. | ||
| Well, this one, like I said, I don't think testimonials there's a lot of good products. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is the first one that I can go, whoa, it really put that on brand. | |
| No, it's funny, I didn't even know the Heimer's I guess because Steve Mary on you year ago, your house like you need to sell this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So we started we got the best brand, it's the strongest. | |
| It's no jokes. | ||
| The first two weeks from MmL's milk is totally different. | ||
| It's like magic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That back problem was from when you were born. | |
| I have a pinched nerve or something. | ||
| I never really knew what's going on. | ||
| Well, you can play my whole life. | ||
| And it's it just bothered me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I I just go through the pain because if you're gonna have it, you're gonna have it, right? | |
| There's nothing to do about it. | ||
| Well, I haven't asked you this yet. | ||
| Have you taken the methylene blue yet? | ||
| No, uh-uh. | ||
| I'm scared of that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Really? | |
| I'm scared it'll make me like resin bar. | ||
| Not that she's not wonderful. | ||
| Just kidding. | ||
| Just kidding. | ||
| She came on the show like six months ago. | ||
| She said, I don't know if I can do it. | ||
| She was just felt sick. | ||
| I can give it to her. | ||
| She was bounced off the walls thirty months later. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you know, for some people, a generic supplement choice that's less, you know, radical methylene blue, which is incredibly powerful. | |
| Might make more sense. | ||
| Something like a methyl drive, a power plant, ultimate burning. | ||
| But especially if it's talking about younger people, methylene blue is radical power. | ||
| Absolutely. | ||
| And then we've got the beauty cleans. | ||
| Bloody Charlotte. | ||
| So you just saw a quick video I shot at dinner. | ||
| Sunday night with my parents and my four amazing children. | ||
| I'm sitting there at dinner, and my mother starts talking about how great her hair looks and how great her skin is and how healthy my dad is, because of bovine colostrum. | ||
| And I go, oh yeah, where'd you get that? | ||
| Three months ago we got in the test samples. | ||
| We've been selling it for two months. | ||
| I went and gave them a few canisters. | ||
| They're like, oh yeah, that is your bovine colostrum. | ||
| The first two weeks of what a mammal puts off is so incredible. | ||
| It's just all these super nutrients, your immune system. | ||
| It's really mother's growth hormone. | ||
| Natural growth hormone, healthy. | ||
| That's what it is from the cow. | ||
| We have the best at the Alex Jones.com. | ||
| Discounted right now. | ||
| And I am so excited about this because we did a survey a year ago to the AlexJoStore.com customers said, What do you want? | ||
| They said, We want ovine colostrum. | ||
| We finally got it in and the reviews are insane from listeners. | ||
| The only thing that's getting better reviews, literally five stars, like four and a half, is our ultramethylene blue. | ||
| So get ultramethylene blue, the best methylene blue, at theoxymstore.com right now, and bovine colostrum with a bunch of other super nutrients that supercharge it right now and it funds this operation. | ||
| And regardless of what happens to InfoWars, I don't own theoximstore.com. | ||
| So it's funding the Alex Jones Network at AJN Live on X and other places. | ||
| So they shut the studio down. | ||
| We have backups. | ||
| Thanks for your support. |
Export Selection