All Episodes
Sept. 19, 2025 - War Room - Harrison Smith
02:40:29
Charlie Kirk Murder Mystery Takes Bizarre Turn
Participants
Main voices
d
donald j trump
07:31
h
harrison smith
01:39:56
i
iyah may
10:45
l
lisa logan
12:36
Appearances
@
@shoe0nhead
04:03
a
alex jones
03:42
b
benjamin netanyahu
02:00
i
ian wendt
01:05
j
jon bowne
01:32
Clips
c
cheryl casone
00:11
c
chuck grassley
00:43
d
del bigtree
00:45
d
dr john eastman
00:37
e
eric schmitt
00:31
j
joe biden
00:14
j
john ratcliffe
00:26
k
kyle petitt
00:26
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
benjamin netanyahu
InfoWars.
Tomorrow's news.
unidentified
Today.
harrison smith
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the warroom infowars.com band.video i'm your host harrison smith we're gonna talk about a lot of stuff today we are gonna talk about charlie kirk's assassination and rounded up we got health the cdc uh really being cooked over the fire we got a lot of stuff to get into but i'm gonna start with a video from a former leftist shoe on head here's her reaction to charlie kirk's murder happened i disagreed with him all the time you can literally go to our twitter interactions i was always
@shoe0nhead
correcting him about like Bernie Sanders.
I made an egg look like his face.
It is safe to say I was no fan, but this has really shaken me in a way that I absolutely did not expect.
These last few days after what happened, I kept going to every single like lefty, liberal, left-wing person I know and like checking out what they have been saying about this.
And besides maybe like four or five, every single one was being an unhinged psychopath about this or saying some backhanded shit like this is why we need gun control, which first of all, we were just watching a whole bunch of people celebrate killing someone over political differences.
You are never taking our guns now.
That is not happening.
I felt like I was in the middle of the ocean.
I was trying to like grasp onto a flotation device, checking all of these accounts for their take, like be normal, be normal.
Nothing, nobody.
I'm just drowning in a sea of evil.
Apparently, maybe I was just blind up until now.
Maybe they changed.
Maybe I changed.
Is everyone going crazy or am I going crazy?
I don't know.
All I know is it is clear how they reacted to this is how they would react to me, my family, my friends, you, your family, your friends.
unidentified
Sir, can you stick to your own show, please?
@shoe0nhead
I have ever stepped that line from the nebulous, ever-changing definition of progressive.
These are people I thought were level-headed.
They were left-wing, but you know, like they were one of the good ones.
Like you can joke with them.
You know, they weren't those like woke SJWs.
Like they were cool.
We can disagree and still be friends.
You know, your friend wouldn't celebrate you being murdered, of course.
But if they would celebrate an exact clone of you that wasn't you, that had all the same opinions, or some of the opinions that you have, if they would celebrate that clone being murdered, they're not your friend.
I'm friends with people who are friends with Charlie, and I see how they are completely broken about this.
Seeing them like this, and then at the same time, my other friend was posting shit like, rip, bozo.
It's just sick.
It's just sick shit.
Personally, I would rather live in a world full of Charlie Kirks who would sit down and debate than a world full of people who agree with me, but would murder people who don't.
Because if it's now normalized to just murder people who disagree with you politically, we don't have a society.
Like, that's it.
It's over.
But some of these people in particular, like, why the fuck are you celebrating?
You.
They think you're a fucking Nazi too.
They'll make a nice compilation of all the hot takes you've had over the years and spread it around to justify your murder.
You don't get it, do you?
We are all Charlie Kirk.
I have been doing this for 11 years.
I have been harassed, doxxed, threatened, whatever, you name it, for 11 years by the left.
And it hasn't moved me an inch because that's not how politics works.
That's lunch table politics.
I've talked about this before.
People on your side being mean to you doesn't mean you overnight change your opinions on like healthcare.
It doesn't work that way.
I still have all my economic left opinions.
I'm for strong social safety nets, workers' rights, unions, wealth caps, whatever.
That has not changed.
This is not me leaving the left because frankly, I don't even know how to do that.
This is me and many, many people looking around us at our so-called allies and realizing that even though we might share some like political opinions, we fundamentally do not have the same values or morals.
And are we really allies if we agree on like taxes but don't agree on the sanctity of human life?
I don't know.
The news cycle will move on.
The world will move on.
Charlie Kirk's kids will move on.
unidentified
10 seconds.
@shoe0nhead
His daughter won't move on.
His daughter does not have a dad anymore.
And that sucks.
unidentified
That fing sucks.
harrison smith
There are only two sides.
There is good and there is evil.
There's life and there's death.
Choose one and then commit.
Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the war room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, Infowars.com.
Band.video.
Share those links.
And of course, you can follow me on Twitter at Harrison H. Smith, X, I guess it's called now, and Harrison H. Smith at Infowars.
You can be following the streams there.
And of course, anything you do to spread the word, we greatly appreciate it.
We have a huge show for you today.
We'll be joined by Lisa Logan in the third hour.
And we also did a pre-recorded interview with Australian musical artist Aya May that will air in the second half of the third hour as well.
And that one's very fun.
Very good.
Good way to go into the weekend, I think.
We're going to talk about, of course, the murder of Charlie Kirk, the continuing saga of the assassination and the fallout.
Donald Trump has declared Antifa a domestic terrorist organization.
At least he intends to sign an order of that effect to that effect.
He wrote as much on his Truth Social platform.
This has caused a lot of confusion and outrage on the left, who were really sure that they were on the right side of history and that things would constantly be moving to the left forever.
And so they've taken no precautions to deal with the off chance that maybe their criminal activity is not looked upon as benign by an administration.
So they're kind of freaking out and they're scrambling to sever ties with other groups, to delete social media posts that reveal what a well-organized and orchestrated series of groups this is.
And look, when this order gets signed, if it gets signed, as Trump has said he'll do, it really opens up the floodgates for investigating Antifa and getting their funding mechanisms rounded up.
And of course, we don't really need investigations to get into this.
We already know we've done the investigations.
They're actually kind of out in the open about all of it.
And it's all the same sources that cause all the other problems in this country.
It's George Soros, it's the ADL, it's the SPLC.
I mean, these are the people that provide the lawyers to get them out of prison.
But of course, they're already in collaboration with the authorities on the ground, either in the police helping to coordinate the riots or the judges helping to sweep it all under the rug.
It's a well-orchestrated, well-organized, well-oiled machine of hatred and death that they're running in this country.
And it's about damn time that it gets rounded up.
I'll bring you the latest on that.
We do have more information about the killing of Charlie Kirk.
And of course, more and more people, I think more and more people are becoming suspicious of what we know so far.
It's been over a week since the murder of Charlie Kirk.
And what we've been provided in terms of evidence is very scant, very thin.
Not particularly convincing if you aren't trying to be convinced, in my opinion.
There are still some pretty big gaps as far as I see it.
And I've been saying for the last week that if they have the video footage they claim to have, if they have the images of the shooter that they claim to be in possession of, then they need to release it.
And it would squash all of the speculation.
It would silence all of the guesses as to who could really be behind this or what could be the truth behind things like the text message exchange.
And the text message exchange in particular is coming under a lot of scrutiny.
Not, well, for a lot of reasons, not the least of which would be the fact that it sounds like a script, like a not very particularly good script.
I've got a couple videos to highlight this.
Let's go first to clip number 31.
Little humor for you here.
This is pretty much how the text message comes across to those of us who are looking at it with a skeptical eye.
It looks an awful lot like this.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Hello, my love.
You have no doubt heard of the shooting, and I must admit, it was I. I had hoped to keep the secret to the grave, but alas, I have not lasted the better part of an hour.
Why have I committed this act?
It was the hate of the man.
Reason had no purchase in the poor soil of his soul.
You have not asked, but in case you were wondering where I hid the rifle, my love, twas over yonder by that lingering squad car.
My old man shall surely be missing it presently.
Do you remember how I was engraving bullets the other day in front of you?
Well, it was just to do a big meme.
Look no further into that.
Also, I shall now misquote my own meme.
Ooh woo, oh, woah.
Probably makes no difference.
I apologize to involve you and for this text to be so short, but I am on the lamb.
In conclusion, I beg you keep this from the prying eyes of the fuzz.
harrison smith
Yeah, pretty not convincing.
Pretty thin stuff there.
And even the things that he says don't exactly make sense.
He was going to keep it to his grave, but he also had already written a confession note that was under the guy's keyboard.
That's a little contradictory.
No, he's telling the guy about this for the first time.
The guy's also seen him engraving bullets.
That's kind of odd.
Obviously, the question of using the terms like squad car, a little bit suspicious.
It's all very suspicious, actually.
On top of the sort of inconsistent narrative we've been given about whether he took the gun apart and put it back together, what exactly we see in the video of him jumping down from the roof.
The fact that that video should show and does show, if you rewind it back 30 seconds, the place where the shot was taken.
So why they wouldn't include that in the release doesn't make a lot of sense.
The only clear image we have actually identifiable of the suspect on campus that day is that picture in the stairwell that they apparently used AI to create and doesn't even look like the guy.
So people notice, like, well, this doesn't even look like the same guy.
And they're like, oh, well, that's because we used AI to enhance.
So we don't even have any evidence that shows that this kid was the guy who shot Charlie Kirk.
If it's out there, great.
I'm excited to see it.
But it hasn't been presented yet and questions are piling up.
Some people notice that the conversation, the text conversation, did seem an awful lot like the outcome of a prompt into ChatGPT going something like, write a text exchange between two gay lovers where one admits to killing Charlie Kirk.
It's like they don't miss a beat.
He covers every single loose end in that text chain.
Confusion about the rifle, he covers that.
Confusion about where he went, when he went there, he covers all that.
It's all, and some people are saying, and maybe the semi-benign answer to this is that he was trying to give cover to his boyfriend.
They have an exchange where it's like, I did this.
What?
You did?
No way.
I had no idea.
But if he's seeing him carve bullets beforehand, like that doesn't even really make sense.
None of it makes sense, I guess, is the long story short.
But people have actually looked into this, run tests on this.
I've seen some varying responses, but most of the tests that have been run say there's a high likelihood that this text exchange was in fact created by AI.
We'll go to a video that explains this.
Clip number 37, where an expert on AI was asked to run a program to determine the likelihood that the text exchange was generated by machine learning.
Let's watch.
ian wendt
Bet you didn't see this.
Hey, man.
So you know a whole lot more about AI than I do.
kyle petitt
Yeah, facts.
What's up?
ian wendt
You saw the ridiculous text chain, right?
kyle petitt
Oh, you mean between Robinson and my love?
Yeah.
Yeah, I did.
Unfortunately.
ian wendt
Do you think you could plug that into AI generator and see what it spits out?
kyle petitt
Oh, yeah.
I'm on it.
Oh, you are not going to believe this.
100% AI, Ian.
100, not 90%, not even 50%.
100% for sure that is AI.
ian wendt
Well, imagine that.
Do me a favor, send it over to me real quick.
kyle petitt
It's on its way.
ian wendt
So that's all real.
That actually happened.
My buddy Kyle here actually looked it up, put it through an AI detector, and sure enough, 100% AI.
You know what else is real, though?
Just got done with my podcast.
It's been now, I don't know, a few hours.
And in the few hours from the time that he put it into that detector until now, now it's saying something a little different.
Check this out.
Man, if I said that it seems like they probably realized that's what was going on and they got to it and changed it, that would just make me a conspiracy theorist, right, guys?
All right.
harrison smith
I winster, Winstister.
And in case you're a radio listener, what it showed was that the first time they put the text in to the AI tester, it said 100% created by AI.
Like you said, not 50%, not 90%, 100% AI.
Then after a few days, they put exactly the same text into exactly the same AI tester, and it says 100% confidence human created, not AI.
That's a little odd, isn't it?
And maybe they did some sort of update of some sort.
Certainly not suspicious or anything.
So it goes from 100% AI to 100% human over the course of a few days.
How very interesting.
The exact same text.
So now I'm even more suspicious.
It's almost like they're stuck in this loop where everything they do to try to cover up their tracks only exposes them more in a way.
At least that's the way I'm interpreting it.
And some people have pointed to this.
I'm suspicious of this as well.
From the New York Times, the article is texts from suspect and Charlie Kirk's shooting offer insight into motive, and it goes through this text chain.
But the way that it describes it has people wondering if this was a poor choice of words or an appropriate choice of words.
What it says in the New York Times is, quote, the text exchange between Mr. Robinson and his partner was reproduced by prosecutors in the charging document.
It shows that Mr. Robinson had texted his partner shortly after the shooting Wednesday about a note left under his keyboard, which read, I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk and I'm going to take it.
The partner reacted with shock, asking if he was joking, you weren't the one that did it right.
But the fact they use the term reproduced has a little bit suspicious.
Shouldn't it just be produced?
When you say reproduced, doesn't that mean you created it?
Isn't that a little bit odd?
Maybe that's the right word.
Maybe that is the right word.
But they kind of did the same thing with the letter, where they're like, there's the letter and we have evidence, forensic evidence, it exists, but it's been destroyed, but we've recreated it.
Somehow, I guess the excuse for that was that they have a picture of it.
So the guy took a picture of the note, then destroyed the note, but provided the picture to law enforcement.
Which, again, is like, okay, we almost have a lot of good evidence.
We're really close to having totally solid, substantial, and verifiable evidence.
But I don't know if we've gotten over that hurdle quite yet, personally.
And it's just little word choices like that that make people question.
Now, wait, what do you mean they reproduced the text messages?
Do you mean they produced them or they reproduced them?
Those are different.
Those are different things.
And you would think the New York Times would be very careful about the way that it chose words.
But despite, you know, regardless of, you know, who actually pulled the trigger and how widespread the conspiracy was to pull this off, obviously it has exposed a very dangerous situation in America with radical left terrorists gleefully celebrating this murder and acting like they are doing something innocent, like they don't even know what they're doing wrong.
It's really very disturbing and very sick.
And it's happening at the highest levels.
Let's go to clip number 20 here.
This is Ilhan Omar talking about Charlie Kirk in a church of all places.
And this, we'll watch the video and then I'll try as hard as I can not to Fed post about it.
Let's watch.
unidentified
I do believe those of you who are interested in me white making this hateful man's history are full of shit.
This hateful man's history.
harrison smith
And the people behind her laugh.
Now pull up the video again.
Let's see who this church is full of.
So this is a church.
Of course, Charlie Kirk was a very strong Christian.
Oh, it's all old boomers.
Oh, it's like a collection of elderly white people clapping along as a Muslim woman stands at their pulpit and demonizes a Christian who was just martyred for his faith.
Look, I can't really express fully how that makes me feel and what I think should be done as a consequence.
And I say that because I really want the people in power to understand that I am like the least likely person to want to do anything.
And that if I'm feeling like I'm feeling at having seen Ilhan Omar standing in the pulpit of a church desecrating the memory of Charlie Kirk, I guarantee you there's a million, probably between one and five million people with the capability to do something really horrific that are way more pissed off than I am.
And like we can't, we're being deliberately provoked, I think is what's happening.
I think Christians in this country are being deliberately provoked to try to get a response.
And it is entirely incumbent on the politicians that exist in office right now and their law enforcement to deal with this issue as severely as necessary so that we don't have to.
I'm telling you, there's a lot more people out there that probably feel a lot more strongly about the sanctity of a church and the importance of not desecrating such a place than I do.
And I'm very mad at this.
Experts warn leftist celebration of Charlie Kirk's death signal a dangerous mainstream shift in politics.
And honestly, it's just sickening to me that you have a church full of people cheering this woman, demonizing a Christian martyr.
I mean, it really is, it really is sickening.
And there really is something very disturbing going on to the surface.
And we'll get into what some of these underlying causes might be.
But Ilhan Omar is the easiest target of all time.
There are so many things that she has done that we have evidence for, proof for, that in any normal situation, she would be punished for by the government.
Why they don't, it's impossible to say.
I have some ideas.
I have some theories about this.
But one thing is that she married her brother in order to get a visa.
And I've always been sort of annoyed at how this talking point is deployed because people seem to think that she like actually married and is in love with her brother and that she's in some sort of incestuous relationship.
That was never the issue.
The issue is that she circumvented our legal immigration system by claiming to be married to her brother so that she could come in on a wife visa when she was never married.
So it was she got into this country fraudulently.
Okay?
Now they refuse to censure her.
Why would they refuse to censure her?
Why would the GOP refuse to censure Ilhan Omar for this?
What she has said about Charlie Kirk, what she has said since he was assassinated, is so unbelievably outrageous.
And again, it's like her saying it is one thing.
We know the left is full of insane psychos.
We're well aware of that.
The thing that really makes me mad is the response of the cowardly, limp-wristed Republican Party, who I genuinely don't know what's wrong with them.
I genuinely do not understand where their survival instincts have gone.
It makes no sense.
It especially makes no sense when you look at some of the actions that have been taken against Congress people, Congressmen, Congresswomen in the past, every time it's against a right-winger and the Republicans often lead the charge.
And I've got some examples of this.
And when you really think about what we're talking about here, it really boggles the mind.
And there is no rational explanation for it.
I don't understand it.
One of the things, you know, one of the arguments against, because we got these other stories, like there's this story from Information Liberation.
Mike Johnson holds private meeting with Jewish leaders, pledges to screen out anti-Israel GOP candidates.
So we can get into this story in just a second.
But there's a lot of talk about this and about the control that Israel has over the Republican Party and the way that they're claiming that not wanting to be involved in a forever war in the Middle East is isolationist.
And you've got the Republican leadership pledging to keep out isolationists, i.e., if you're America first, you are no longer welcome in the Republican Party.
That's extremely, extremely troubling.
But I've got people talking about that and saying, well, if Israel really controlled Congress, why won't they vote out Ilhan Omar?
She's such a thorn in Israel's side.
She's so anti-Israel.
Wouldn't they weaponize the Republican Party against her?
And you would think, one would think.
Why they don't?
Couldn't possibly say.
Could not possibly say.
Now, they voted to censure her, and it failed by one vote.
Every Democrat voted against censoring her, obviously.
Four Republicans joined them.
Now, I did some research because I wanted to see.
I thought, well, you know what?
Maybe APAC just isn't cracking the whip on these guys.
Maybe they don't have any leverage over them.
I mean, if AIPAC really is, you know, this big enemy of Ilhan Omar, would they not use the Republican Party to censure her and try to remove power from her, kick her off committee assignments, that sort of thing?
Well, the four representatives who did not want to censure her is allowing her to get away with this and maintain power over the American people.
And by the way, the reason that the excuses that they're giving are like, you know, well, while it makes me sad to see Ilhan Omar said, we have free speech and we have to stand up for free speech.
And I want to remind the congressman, there is no threat to free speech about saying that I do not want a murderous foreign interloper with power over the American people.
She is not she does not consider herself American.
She does not have any love for our foundation and our founding principles.
She doesn't give a damn about free speech.
She literally constantly talks about how much more she loves Somalia than America.
Should we go to one of those videos?
Because I've got several, but we can go to one.
Clip 17 here.
Ilhan Omar, again, just gushing with her love of this failed state, Somalia, which appears at the bottom or second to last on every single list of human development in the world.
When you list every country by their development, Somalia is bottom or second to bottom on every list.
It is a total failed state.
It is just a playground for warlords and pirates.
It's chaos manifest.
And we rescued her from this chaos because if she was still there, she'd be dead in the ground because her family was part of one of the warring factions involved in this constant turmoil, this just node of chaos that we call Somalia.
But here she is, clip 17, talking about how much she loves it and just can't wait to get back there.
I'm an American migrant, she says in the U.S. Congress.
But I am a Somali girl.
A girl with your lineage.
A girl with your language.
A girl with your religion.
That was a young child taken from her country, like she was stolen on a slave ship that misses her country and wishes to live there.
Well, you may have your wish come true, lady, and share with its people.
I am hopeful in the future that me and my children will be able to raise our kids in this land where I was born and raised.
Okay, great.
Then we completely agree.
We can take it down.
We completely agree.
You belong in Somalia.
Your mindset, your language, your ideas, your philosophy, your character, it is Somali.
It's not American.
And so when we do, as we should take her back to Somalia because she lied about her immigration or she lied about her status in order to circumvent the immigration restrictions, then I don't want to hear a complaint.
I want to hear a big thank you.
I want a big thank you card from Ilhan Omar when we joyfully send her back to Somalia, never to return.
Won't that be a wonderful thing for all of us?
She can't wait.
Welcome back, folks.
This is the War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
I really do have so much other stuff to talk about today, including stuff like the fact that in the UK, Bible Gateway is now blocked.
The Bible Gateway, the most popular online Bible website or app in the world, which is used by millions and millions of Christians around the world to find Bible verses, has been removed in the UK due to the Online Safety Act.
You can no longer access the Bible in the UK because the Online Safety Act tells you what's really behind some of these free speech laws they're putting into place, the anti-free speech laws.
So I want to get into that sort of stuff.
We got a lot of stuff to talk about, but obviously, Charlie Kirk, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, what we are finding out about it.
There's new information about other perverted communities that this suspect was involved in.
And I'm going to get to all of that.
But in the wake of this, a simple resolution honoring the life and legacy of Charlie Kirk after his assassination passed in the U.S. House.
58 Democrats could not bring themselves to show respect for Charlie Kirk and voted against it, but it passed.
So at least it passed.
But when it comes to the censoring of Ilhan Omar, it didn't pass.
It failed by one vote because four Republican congressmen voted against it.
And as I was saying before, this was presented by somebody online saying if AIPAC controlled the Republican Party, why wouldn't they oust Ilhan Omar?
And hey, that's a great question.
I think actually, if you really think about that, it brings up some very uncomfortable questions about what their purpose really is and what their priorities really are.
Because I can tell you, four Republican congressmen did not vote to censor Ilhan Omar.
Were Representative Mike Flood of Nebraska, Jeff Heard of Colorado, or yeah, Colorado, Tom McClintock of California, and Corey Mills of Florida.
Those are the ones that voted not to censure Ilhan Omar and allows her to stay on committees.
Now, in case you're not aware of how this works, the committee is the choke point for bills to get through.
Committees, there are multiple committees.
If you're on the committee, you get a say on what bills go to the floor to be voted on.
So all bills start in committee, and only once the committee passes it does it go to the floor and then it goes to the Senate and then it goes back to the, but it all starts in the committee.
So if you're on these committees, that is where the real power is.
Like as a congressman, sure, you can vote on stuff, but if you're not in a committee, you don't really have much sway.
You don't really have much impact on what bills come to the floor for people to vote on.
So kicking somebody off of these committees is really stripping them of the actual power that they're supposed to have as congressmen.
Now, the four who voted against censuring Ilhan Omar have all received at least $45,000 from APAC.
Mike Flood has received 46.
Jeff Hurd has received 64.
Tom McClintock has received 44,000.
Corey Mills has received 48,000.
So why these APAC-funded Republicans are not voting to censure Ilhan Omar?
I don't really know.
I'm not really sure why that is.
Clearly, there's some sort of inconsistency there since she is such a prominent and powerful voice against Israel.
But I guess they want her around for some reason.
So I don't know.
You can ask whatever questions you want about that.
But what it really goes to show, I think, is just the complete willful impotence of the Republican Party.
Because I don't know if I need to remind you this, over the last four years or so, there have been multiple examples of Republicans being stripped from committee assignments or being kicked out of Congress totally.
And in many of the cases, the Republicans have led the charge on this.
And by the way, do they think that they're getting good boy points for doing this?
This is the thing that really I have a hard time comprehending.
You know, George Santos is one of the people who was kicked out of Congress, mostly by Republicans.
Have you heard anybody say, you know, you can say what you want about Republicans, but when they have a bad apple, they get rid of it.
Not like those Democrats.
They'll stick by each other no matter what.
But the Republicans, you know, you got to be morally upstanding or else they don't want anything to do with you.
No, I've actually heard the exact opposite.
There's a woman I was talking to who was like, you know, I want to like the Republicans, but you look at somebody like George Santos and it's like, gee, both sides are bad.
It's like, wait, wait, what did George Santos even do?
I don't know.
He like lied on his resume or something.
And then what happened as a consequence of that?
The Republicans immediately kicked him off of everything and ousted him from the Congress, totally weakening themselves, totally hurting themselves, but doing it because, you know, this guy was not good and they didn't want to be associated with him.
Was there any goodwill brought about from that?
Anybody say, you know, those Republicans, they had to make a sacrifice, but they did.
They hurt themselves because they knew it was bad for the country to have a liar as a congressman.
Are you receiving any kudos for that?
Any goodwill for that?
Of course not.
Obviously not.
So let's go through some of these stripping of committee assignments that have happened in the past.
Marjorie Taylor Greene lost her House committee assignments in 2021.
Now, what did she do?
Did she justify the murder of a political opponent?
Did she slander a dead man?
No.
Do you even remember what it was?
It was about past comments and social media posts promoting conspiracy theories and violence.
What violence?
Nothing, really.
I think this actually had to do with Jewish space lasers, if I'm not mistaken.
I think they went on Facebook posts, found stuff from long before she was ever even in politics, found she'd promoted a September 11th conspiracy theory and stripped her of committee assignments for that.
Nothing that she'd even done while a congressperson and went back into her old social media posts, found something they didn't like and stripped her of committee assignments.
I believe Nancy Pelosi did this without even putting it to a vote somehow.
I don't even understand how that is possible.
Representative Tom Cole, Republican of Oklahoma, distanced himself from Green's past rhetoric, but said the issue of kicking her off committee should not be adjudicated by the House Ethics Committee.
But then it was.
And there you go.
She was just taken down.
So Marjorie Taylor Greene, stripped of her committee assignments by the House Ethics Committee, not even by a full-fledged vote of the House, because she had questioned the 9-11 attacks.
Here's what she'd said.
We'd witnessed 9-11, the terrorist attack in New York, and the plane that crashed in Pennsylvania and the so-called plane that crashed into the Pentagon, she said at the time.
It's odd that we're never given any evidence shown for a plane in the Pentagon.
But anyways, I won't.
I'm not going to dive into the 9-11 controversy conspiracy.
So they pulled that up and kicked her off her committee assignments.
Okay?
Compare that to Ilhan Omar justifying the murder of an innocent man.
And Republicans are like, gee, what can we do?
I mean, we're not going to strip her of her assignments.
We can't set that precedent as if it hasn't already been set over and over and over.
They're not the only one.
Steve King removed from committee assignments following racist comments.
Y'all remember this one?
Unceremoniously stripped of all power he had in Congress.
Why?
Because he gave an hour-long interview to the New York Times in which one sentence was objectionable, in which he simply said, I don't understand why these terms white supremacy, white nationalism, Western culture are being used as pejoratives.
Right?
Why are these bad words?
White nationalism.
Why is that bad?
He's not saying I'm a white national.
He's not saying I am a white supremacist.
He's saying that, you know, this whole leftist mind virus is insane.
And you're basically demonizing white people and demonizing white countries.
You wouldn't do that to any other group.
Why do you do Atars?
It was one sentence out of an hour-long interview, and it was the Republicans that led the charge to strip him of all his committee assignments.
Now, is what he said even remotely as offensive as Ilhan Omar, let alone even more so?
Of course not.
And yet the Republicans will stand up for Ilhan Omar and they throw Steve King under the bus.
Have you been rewarded for that?
Have you been pat on the head by your masters for that?
I wonder.
Republican Representative Steve King of Iowa has been removed from committee assignments following racist remarks.
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy announced Monday the latest development in the bipartisan condemnation of King's recent interview that appeared to lament that the term white supremacist is considered offensive.
It's like such a bizarre, like he's just having a conversation.
He's just like, yeah, they use white supremacists as an insult.
Like it's weird.
I'm not even sure what he was trying to say exactly.
But it was Kevin McCarthy that kicked him off.
And it was Mitch McConnell that led the charge in the Senate.
He says, one of my quotes in the New York Times story has been completely mischaracterized, going into lengthy detail of what he described as a 56-minute interview with the publication.
He concluded with, I will continue to point out the truth and work with all the vigor I have to represent the 4th District Iowans for the next two years.
And he was stripped from his committee by Kevin McCarthy while being criticized by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, saying there's no place in the Republican Party or Congress for the country of an ideology of racial supremacy of any kind, except for Jews.
unidentified
Except for Jews, right?
harrison smith
This is the thing.
He merely mentions white supremacy in a less than condemning tone, and all the Republicans immediately come together to distance themselves from him, condemn him, strip him of his committee assignments, and just shuffle him off to the side, spitting on him as they can.
Meanwhile, you have Ilhan Omar, just traitor, just absolute, vicious, hateful moron from a foreign country who constantly is reminding us how much he loves her own country more than America, how she gives speeches in front of her congregation saying, I'm there to do the work for Somalia.
I'm there to represent Somalia in the American Congress, who makes these incredibly offensive and hateful posts about Charlie Kirk, in which he justifies his murder and says it's a good thing, or claims people are trying to whitewash the fact that he was a hateful bigot.
Republicans can't seem to bring themselves to condemn that.
I wonder why.
Generally, I wonder why.
I don't know.
I don't get it.
I have an idea, though.
We'll get to my theory in a second.
George Santos, expelled from the House of Representatives.
House of Representatives voted 311 to 114 to expel New York Congressman George Santos, making him the sixth member ever to be expelled in the vote of Congress.
This was back in 2023 when the Republicans, of course, to uphold our great reputation, kicked this guy out, weakened themselves.
He was accused of financial misdeeds, including reimbursing himself for loans to his congressional campaign that he appears to have never actually made, in essence, stealing money from campaign donors, as if every single Democrat doesn't have their wife or husband running an NGO that they funnel millions of dollars to.
Take a look at Maxine Waters, if you want a specific example.
Nancy Pelosi's daughter is another one.
But it doesn't matter.
They replaced Santos.
They expel him.
So Steve King, Marjorie Taylor Greene, George Santos, all of them stripped of their committee assignments.
George Santos kicked entirely out of Congress with the cooperation and joyful, enthusiastic participation of the right-wing party in Congress.
But when it comes to Ilhan Omar, they just can't bring themselves to do it.
What is wrong with them?
What is wrong with them?
And this is the thing that I think makes the discussion about Israel so important.
Because while the issue of Israel is one thing, this foreign state and its control it exercises over America, it's all of the other influences that come along with that.
It's things like the ADL and APAC, who, yes, their main focus is stopping people talking badly about Israel or making sure everything Israel wants passes through the Senate.
At the same time, who do you think is advising the likes of Kevin McCarthy and Mitch McConnell to denounce Steve King for white supremacy?
Do you think it might be the organizations that constantly are the source of the claim that white supremacy is the biggest threat to this country?
That white supremacy is the only threat worthy of considering action against?
Do you think maybe, like, think about this.
You've got these people that are dedicated to AIPAC that receive tens of thousands of dollars from APAC.
And yet, these very people who will kick Steve King out of his committees for white supremacy, but refuse to kick Ilhan Omar off her committees for the deplorable things she said about Charlie Kirk.
How does that make any sense?
And if you expand it out even wider, and we're talking about specifically the assassination of Charlie Kirk, why do you think it is that we haven't gone after Antifa for the last 10 years?
What force in politics do you think is keeping Antifa from being labeled a domestic terrorist up until now?
I know exactly who it is.
It's the ADL.
They publish it on their website.
They train the FBI.
They are who the U.S. government goes to to determine who's a domestic terrorist and who's not.
And the ADL will remind you over and over and over again, they're on the side of Antifa.
So you've got Antifa training the FBI as to who was domestic terrorist and who isn't.
Gee, I wonder why they haven't been dealt with so far.
I wonder why this festering cancer of leftist extremism has been allowed to grow unabated for the last 10 years.
Could it have something to do with the fact that anybody who wants to move against them gets slapped down by APAC and the ADL?
It probably is.
So these things are not separate.
They're deeply intertwined.
The ADL and APAC are funded by and work directly with the Israeli government.
The Israeli government uses those organizations to not just prevent people from speaking out against it, either passing anti-Semitism laws or the money that's always passed, but also to make sure that white supremacy is considered the number one threat and is in the top of everybody's mind.
And that if a Republican congressman says something objectionable about white supremacy, they get kicked out immediately.
But Ilhan Omar hates America, hates Charlie Kirk lying about it, saying just the most horrible things.
She stays on.
She doesn't get voted against by the very people who APAC funds to the tunes of $50,000 each.
Do you see what I'm saying?
Are the dots connecting here?
From FBI.gov, from the official FBI website, March 8th, 2017.
The FBI and ADL working together to fight hate.
I sang you.
This is from celebrated legendary FBI head, James Comey.
Old Jimmy, we love him, don't we?
Well, he wrote this love letter to the ADL.
I sang your praises as an organization that fights for inclusivity and diversity, equality and justice, an organization that works with us to fight hate crime and terrorism, to educate law enforcement and to build bridges with underrepresented communities.
I labeled that last speech a love letter to the ADL.
Three years later, I can say from the perspective of the FBI, we're still in love with you.
What?
What is this sickening, saccharin sweet love story between the FBI and the ADL?
Well, it's why we have Antifa.
It's why they exist.
It's why they've never been treated the same way the Proud Boys were or the Oath Keepers were or InfoWars was.
Somehow, InfoWars was declared a white supremacist organization in 2013 and was spied on for 12 years, never brought charges because we never did anything wrong because we're not a terrorist organization.
How does InfoWars get declared a terrorist organization in 2013?
But Antifa is literally killing people routinely.
Aaron Danielson, shot in the chest, Antifa celebrating it.
We got one.
I mean, it goes on and on.
I don't know if I grabbed the video of Tim Poole describing some of the stuff he's seen Antifa do.
We've all seen it.
We've all seen it.
It's continuous, which is what makes it so absurd.
We have people like Jerry Nadler say Antifa doesn't exist.
It doesn't exist.
Absurd, but an ADL talking point.
So not only is James Comey writing these love letters to the ADL about how brilliant they are and about how they direct the FBI to do everything they do.
The ADL says to themselves, May 30th, 2014, did you know the ADL trains every new FBI agent on their role as protectors of the American people and the Constitution?
Well, that's got to be a good thing, right?
I mean, they're the anti-defamation league.
They're the ones who know all about hate.
They're the best to tell everybody.
But the problem is, if you go to the ADL, you can find articles like this.
Who are Antifa?
And they say this.
Antifa is a decentralized leaderless movement composed of those collections of groups, networks, and individuals.
Persistent disinformation campaigns about Antifa distort public perception of the movement.
Antifa's professed purpose is to vigorously oppose fascism, guys.
It's in the name.
They're the anti-bad guy contingent, so how could they be bad?
They're the anti-bad guys.
It's in the name.
Okay?
Sure.
I mean, when they're, you know, firebombing a pro-life protest, you know, that might seem bad, but they're not bad because they're the anti-bad guys.
So how could they be bad?
While some extreme actors who claim to be affiliated with Antifa do engage in violence or vandalism at rallies or events, this is not the norm.
No, not the norm.
No, it's a bunch of upstanding, productive citizens, isn't it?
Because there's no unifying body for Antifa, it is impossible to know how many adherents are currently active.
Different localities have Antifa populations of different strengths, but Antifa adherents are also sometimes willing to travel hundreds of miles to oppose a white supremacist event, you know, like a Trump rally.
Why do you think we haven't dealt with Antifa?
It's the ADL.
That's why.
Why do we have this festering cabal of domestic terrorists openly operating on American soil?
It's the ADL.
It's Israel who works hand in hand with the ADL and has for decades.
And it goes on and on just to downplay everything about Antifa, celebrate everything about Antifa, tell you everything you've heard about Antifa that's bad is wrong.
And actually, they're just, you know, innocent anti-fascists.
And anybody who does commit violence in their name isn't actually a part of them.
Isn't that convenient?
Do you think the ADL gives the same leniency to right-wingers?
Are you kidding?
Obviously not.
What about this?
As one of their hate symbols, wrap your mind around this.
The ADL is a list of hate symbols.
One of their hate symbols is anti-Antifa images.
So if you have symbols showing that you don't like Antifa, they say that's driven by hate and it's white supremacy if you oppose Antifa.
So the people training our FBI have in their official, and I printed out these today.
These are all from the website today.
The articles are from 2019, 2017, but this is the official status of Antifa, according to the ADL, who trains our FBI as to who is extremist and who isn't.
And they say not only is Antifa not an extremist group, not a domestic terrorist group, not even really a group at all.
They're just people who share a wonderful idea about being against fascism.
They also say being against Antifa is hate, is terrorism, is white supremacy, and should be investigated.
I wonder why Antifa has been able to grow.
Although white supremacist animus is often thought of as being directed against religious, racial, and ethnic minorities, a significant portion of their hateful rhetoric is directed against the political left, including both the mainstream and far left.
For example, a common alt-right meme offers free helicopter rides to people on the left, a reference to the tactic used by right-wing dictatorships in Argentina and Chile.
White supremacists, anti-left, or sinistrophobic.
Sinistro.
Is that to be scared of sinister people?
What does that even mean?
Oh, left, left-handed, sinister is left-hand.
So we're afraid of the left.
That's what that.
Okay, so you got the ADL making up words to justify demonizing people that don't like mask-clad communists burning down their cities.
So the symbolism especially targets far-left and anarchist activists who've dedicated themselves to actively opposing and exposing white supremacists.
So again, anti-Antifa imagery.
Yeah, here's Antifa.
Here's the ADL's pets.
Here's the ADL's good boys who didn't do nothing.
Oh, just innocent, loving, anti-white spirit.
Look at these white supremacists.
The cops are white supremacists in this.
How dare they lock a gate against a roving mob burning down the construction site where you're building a oh, yeah, throwing fireworks at cops.
Look at those damn cops.
What are they doing?
One guy's bald.
He's probably a skinhead.
How dare he oppose these wonderful, beautiful leftist activists with his white supremacist ideas of being against Antifa, wanting to kill him and trying to in that moment.
So, again, we can get more into this, but like to act like Israel's influence in America is somehow a separate topic when it comes to the Charlie Kirk murder, the rise of Antifa, the criminal gangs that are operating in this country, often foreign-funded.
Because by the way, Antifa gets funding from Germany.
They get funding from all.
It is an international crime ring.
And they are defended by the very organizations that are in charge of educating the FBI about extremism itself.
Why do you think they haven't been dealt with yet?
What do you think the solution is to deal with them?
I think if you want to deal with Antifa, first and foremost, you need to deal with the ADL, who's the one that's been stopping us from dealing with this the entire time.
That's my take on it.
We'll get to more on the other side.
We're going to start with a John Bound report about the way the FBI has been going after right-wingers, including TPUSA, rather vociferously, also at the behest of the ADL.
I want to remind you to go to thealxjonesstore.com, thealexjonesstore.com slash Harrison, if you want to let me know who sent you.
Buy yourself some of the merchandise, get yourself some of the supplements, take advantage of the massive sales, become a VIP member, and know that you are contributing to this singular outlet that is pursuing the truth no matter where it leads us and no matter where we go.
Ultimate Life Force, absolutely incredible.
Ultramethylen Blue.
I heard Alex say it has like an 80% reorder rate.
That is crazy.
That's crazy.
It's unprecedented, folks.
Find out why.
Ultramethylene Blue, USP grade, now on sale.
The AlexJonesStore.com.
We'll be back on the other side.
All right, folks, welcome back to the war room.
Second hour is on.
Donald Trump is live in the Oval Office about to sign some executive orders and taking questions from the press.
Hopefully he signs the executive order declaring Antifa a domestic terrorist organization today since he promised to do that yesterday on Truth Social.
We go now live to the Oval Office.
unidentified
Follow up on Charlie Kirk.
There's been a lot of talk about free speech this week.
Do you see a difference between cancel culture and consequence culture?
donald j trump
I mean, your question's a little trick question.
I'm a very strong person for free speech.
At the same time, when you have networks that where I won an election, like in counties, I guess it's 2,600 to 525.
It's called landslide times two.
When you have that kind of level of popularity or voter support, as I did in the last election, and yet 97 and 94%, different numbers, you see different numbers with different stats, but 97, 94, 95, 96% of the people are against me in the sense of the newscasts are against me.
The stories are 90%, they said 97% bad.
So they gave me 97%.
They'll take a great story and they'll make it bad.
See, I think that's really illegal, personally.
You can't have a free airwave.
You're getting free airwaves from the United States government.
And you can't have that and say, and somebody that just won an election.
And I had to go through this during the election.
I think it's a miracle that I can win when 97% of the stories on the networks are bad or whatever it may be, whether it's 89, it doesn't matter.
It's a tremendous number.
You know it.
You report it all the time.
And it changes.
But when you have that kind of a negative reporting, fake negative reporting, when they take a great story and they make it into a bad story constantly, that's what they do.
Look, 60 Minutes took Kamala's answer, and they threw it out, and they gave her a different answer so that she sounded competent.
When things like that happen, George Slapadopoulos from your network, right?
George Slapadopoulos had to pay $16 million to me because of what he said.
And that's ABC.
You had to pay more than that.
Your network had to pay more than that.
So I think it's very sad.
But I think that the reporting has to be at least accurate, at least accurate to an extent.
Again, when somebody is given 97% of the stories are bad about a person, that's no longer free speech.
That's no longer anything.
That's just cheating.
And they cheat.
And they become really members of the Democrat National Committee.
That's what they are, the networks, in my opinion.
They're just offshoots of the Democrat National Committee.
ian wendt
Liam Khoskro with Zero Hedge.
unidentified
People are still anticipating who your pick for National Security Advisor will be.
ian wendt
They're worried Marco Rubio is a little overworked.
unidentified
And one of the reported frontrunners is Michael Anton from the State Department.
ian wendt
He's just authored the National Security Strategy.
unidentified
Also in the mix is Mike Flynn and Steve Witcoff.
Can you give us an indication?
donald j trump
Well, they're all good.
We'll make a decision soon.
But we're doing very well.
You know, I settled seven wars more than that, I think.
But actually, we settled seven wars.
I have working on Gaza.
It's a tough one, but we'll get it done somehow.
And we're also working with Russia and Ukraine.
They hate each other so much, you wouldn't believe it.
President Putin and President Zelensky, they hate each other to a level that you wouldn't believe.
So they're having a little bit of a problem with that.
unidentified
And are you considering Stephen Moran for Fed chair?
donald j trump
I hadn't thought of it too much.
He's doing a great job.
Just got approved.
His vote was a very good one.
The Fed should have done more.
Too late.
Powell is terrible.
He's a terrible chair.
I think it's just terrible.
But despite that, we're powering through it.
We have another record stock market today.
We're very, very high levels, and we're at the highest levels.
So we're setting records many, many days during my administration.
We've set records, and we'll see what happens with 50,000.
50,000 is a pretty big number.
Never come close.
We're not so far away from it.
So that's because they see what's happening.
Not so much what's happening exactly right now, but they see all the plans that are being built.
They see the kind of investment.
harrison smith
All right, folks, we're going to pick this up on the other side.
Trump is signing executive orders in the Oval Office today, but he's taking questions from the press first, I guess, which is an interesting switcheroo.
Welcome back, folks.
This is War Room.
Second hour is on.
And third hour, I'm going to be joined by Lisa Logan talking about social-emotional learning.
Which I think deserves increased scrutiny, especially as we're seeing what's happening with the education system, not only turning out college kids who seem to genuinely not be human or have human emotions as they celebrate or shrug off the brutal murder of a young father who've seen video after video like that.
But then I noticed, at least in the first day, pretty much every video I saw celebrating Charlie Kirk's death was from a university professor, employee of some sort, a teacher in some line of education, which is extremely disturbing, extremely disturbing, that we have these people teaching our children.
But he just, the crew is monitoring this Trump press conference.
We could go back to it, but he's sort of talking about who he thinks is chat.
I guess we should go back to it.
But that first question he was asked was about cancel culture versus consequence culture.
And I got to say, I'm a little bit disappointed by his response.
His response was sort of make a larger point about the bias of the mainstream media, which is absolutely true.
There's no doubt about it.
And the figures he cites, I'm very familiar with.
97% negative reports on Donald Trump.
When it comes to late-night shows, we showed you the article yesterday that's like, why don't late-night shows ever make fun of Biden?
They spent four years ignoring the presidency.
Wonder why that is.
Well, because they're completely partisan.
And he's right.
They are essentially an extension of the DNC, and their broadcast should be considered sort of in-kind donations to the Democratic Party because that's all they're concerned with.
But it's not about you, Trump.
This isn't about you.
Does he think this is about him?
This isn't about you.
It's about Charlie Kirk.
So he's asked about consequence culture, like, you know, Jimmy Kimmel.
And he's like, well, they talk bad about me, and that's not fair.
It's like, this is literally nothing to do with you, actually.
Which is, I mean, oh, he talked about decapitated babies on October 7th.
dr john eastman
Yeah.
harrison smith
It's interesting because I was about to ask, you know, who's giving Trump information?
Like, does he not get the correct response, I think, to that is, you know, cancel culture is when people were being fired from their jobs for like saying all lives matter.
Do you know how many people were fired for saying, yes, Black Lives Matter, but all lives matter?
And they were fired.
That's obscene.
That's ridiculous.
That's cancel culture.
Consequence culture is when people don't want psychopaths teaching their children in elementary school.
When you don't want despicable weirdos who are dancing on the grave of an innocent man to be imparting that mindset into the young minds that they're in charge of.
That's consequence culture because these people should not be around children.
They should not have their jobs.
It's completely understandable why you wouldn't want to attend a business or go to school with people who want you dead.
That's obvious.
Now, if people are just not as on board with the far leftist, you know, brainwashing as you are, that's no excuse to fire them.
If they just say all lives matter rather than black lives matter, that's not a reason to fire somebody.
Somebody's name being similar to a Civil War general, so he gets taken off the job.
That's cancel culture.
That's ridiculous.
That's what we've always been against.
But like I said yesterday, nobody on our side would have been surprised or shocked or outraged if somebody was fired from an important job or a job where you have to deal with kids and they're out there on their personal account making a video mocking the death of George Floyd and saying more black people should be killed by police.
Like, would any of us have been outraged by that and been like, cancel culture gone wild?
No, it would have been like, yeah, dude, why would you make that video, you idiot?
These are completely different topics.
And it's just, it's just upsetting, honestly, that Trump is, he just, he obviously just doesn't understand.
He obviously just is not aware of what's actually happening right now.
I guess nobody's telling him what's happening.
I guess he's believing what they are saying.
And they're talking about October 7th.
Let's go to that clip now.
Can we do it?
Do we go live to the press conference where you said he had a question about October 7th?
unidentified
Yeah.
donald j trump
When it comes to Israel and the Middle East.
So we have a long time to go.
But you know a lot of my opinions.
And remember this, you can't forget October 7th either.
People are forgetting October 7th.
They get it too quickly.
That was one of the worst days in world history.
unidentified
I bet.
donald j trump
It was the most evil attack that I think you could really say babies were involved, little babies were involved.
harrison smith
Were they?
unidentified
Having their heads chopped off and all of the things that took place.
donald j trump
You can't forget that.
I don't forget that.
A lot of people do, but I don't.
Yeah, please.
lisa logan
What goes into retaking Bagram?
Does that require boots on the ground?
donald j trump
We'll see what happens with Bagram.
We're talking to Afghanistan.
It should have never been given up.
It was the most embarrassing day in the history of our country.
There's no reason to give it up.
I was leaving Afghanistan.
I was leaving.
I was the one that got it down to 5,000 soldiers, but we were going to keep Bagram.
harrison smith
You're talking about taking back over Bagram base, which is the base that we unceremoniously fled under Joe Biden, resulting in the death of, was it 13 servicemen and women?
So Trump's talking about retaking that.
I don't even know how that's going to go.
But he repeats the lie about beheaded babies on October 7th.
And it's like, was there a beheaded baby?
I don't know.
I know I've seen more dead children as a result of Israel bombing Gaza than I ever wanted to in my life.
I know that's a continual source of dead children.
At least he didn't say 40 babies in an oven because that's the talking point that, again, has just been blown out of the water since the moment it was made, yet it persists constantly because you have to have the atrocity porn.
You have to have the atrocity, the emotion, drive up people's blood pressure, get that adrenaline spiking so they can make bad decisions and feel like if we don't do it now, we're all going to die.
So we better just do it.
Don't think about the consequences.
Again, I wouldn't even, this is the problem is it's like, I don't want to talk about Israel, but everybody in power won't shut the hell up about Israel.
It's the only topic they talk about.
Seems to be the only topic they care about.
So, I guess we got to talk about it now.
And I guess we will.
Let's go to clip 18 here.
There's a little compilation I put together.
There's a little compilation I put together about Benjamin Netanyahu.
Just, you know, over the last six months or so, he just keeps being accused of things.
He has to deny it.
And it's just, you got to feel for the guy.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Your own soldiers have been accused of killing innocent Gazans who are in line for food.
benjamin netanyahu
Yeah, I could deny it because it's Hamas accusation.
They're the ones often who are doing the shooting.
harrison smith
And the analyst in the studios, Israel is not in violation.
unidentified
Netanyahu has denied that reporting along with accusations that he is trying to perpetuate the war in Gaza.
benjamin netanyahu
You know, the deception, the lies, the starved children, the pictures of starved children.
And also, the reason you see the flattened buildings is because Hamas booby traps every single building.
How many civilians were killed?
Practically none.
The charge that Israel deliberately attacked Unifield personnel is completely false.
unidentified
President Trump, in the last couple of days, vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader.
Is that true?
benjamin netanyahu
Actually, there's so many false reports.
And frankly, we also have to do something about the algorithms and the social networks.
This kangaroo court called the ICC.
They declared me a war criminal.
If we're practicing genocide, we're surely doing a very bad job of it.
But all these stories are repeated ad nauseum.
But I can tell you categorically, there is no army in the world that acts in a more moral fashion than the army of Israel.
Israel has the most moral army and also the most adjudicated army.
What a bold-face lie.
unidentified
Netanyahu also rejected claims made by Barr that he was fired for political motives.
benjamin netanyahu
And yet Israel is, of course, accused again and again and again.
Pretty much the way that in the Middle Ages Jews were accused of killing Christian children for their blood.
If you repeat a lie often enough, it assumes the cachet of self-evident truth.
Well, somebody has fabricated a monstrous big lie that Israel had something to do with Charlie Kirk's murder.
This is insane.
It is false.
It is outrageous.
When Jews, especially in the Middle Ages, the horrific Middle Ages, the worst things were said about Jews you can possibly believe.
We were poisoning the wells.
We were drinking the blood of Christian children.
You name it.
I mean, these things.
That continued actually up to the Holocaust.
I don't think people will give in to these ridiculous, ridiculous lies.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is a turning point.
harrison smith
Poor guy, man.
It's just, he can't get a break.
All these people just accusing him of the most outrageous things, right?
The ICC is accusing him of stuff.
Trump's accusing him of stuff.
Videos are accusing him of stuff.
All the dead babies are accusing him of stuff.
All the starvation is accusing him of stuff.
It's just, it's just, it never ends, poor guy.
He's just innocent of all of it.
All of it is wrong.
Isn't that crazy?
Isn't that nuts?
Just constantly having to beat back all these lies that Israel's let October 7th happen.
Ridiculous.
That they're bombing Gaza in order to carry out ethnic cleansing.
Crazy.
That this might rise to the level of genocide.
Insane, anti-Semitic.
That he's starving children systematically.
Nuts.
How could you even imagine such a thing?
And it goes on and on and on and on and on and on and on.
I mean, did you know that the reason Gaza is flattened is because Hamas blew up all of their own buildings?
Did you know that?
They're so crazy, aren't they?
Just so they can blame it on the Jews.
It's just, it reminds me of the Middle Ages.
It reminds me of my youth in the Middle Ages.
So it's just absurd.
It's just absolutely absurd.
Now, again, you know, about this, there's good reason to blame Israel because Charlie Kirk blamed Israel.
Because I heard a month before he died from somebody with intimate knowledge who told me Charlie Kirk's afraid Israel is going to kill him.
And I'm in this sort of weird position because I can understand how if you weren't me, you would have trouble just taking that at face value.
Now, it's not really, it's not really that hard to assume because I did tweet it out a month before Charlie Kirk was murdered.
Now, I've never tweeted that out about anybody ever.
It's not the type of thing.
I just typically, you know, people are literally out there being like, you're just like trying to get views.
And it's like, what?
So you think I just randomly tweet out this person's afraid of being killed by Israel on the off chance that they're murdered a month later?
And, but it's the first time I did it.
I just happened to get lucky this time.
It's ridiculous.
The very fact that I tweeted that out is proof that it should be taken seriously because it was a month before and it was firsthand knowledge.
Secondhand knowledge on my part.
But that's not the only reason.
Got reason after reason after reason to assume this.
And again, I could understand why, if you weren't me, you could write this off.
That's what people do.
They go, well, whatever.
This just was a good guess or something.
And they just go, well, you know, who told you?
Tell us the name.
And it's like, I literally can't.
I mean, I could, but like, it's not my information to tell.
And the person that told me doesn't want to put their name on it.
Doesn't want to go.
I'm trying, guys.
I'm insisting, you've got to go public with this.
Say what you know.
Go to Max Blumenthal.
They won't do it.
And it's not my right to expose their secret.
Also, who's going to ever trust me ever again?
I didn't have permission to put it up in the first place to put up that tweet saying Charlie Kirk's freezing.
I didn't ask if I could put that up, but I did.
But I'm not going to reveal their name if they don't want me to, because I haven't been given permission.
It's not my right.
So I can't do that.
All I can ask is that you trust me.
Because for me, I can't write that off.
I can't just go, well, it may have happened, but, you know, maybe he's lying and just, you know, justify it that way.
I heard it.
I was told this.
I can't just pretend that I don't know.
Now, I, again, can see how people can go, well, we don't know the name of your source, so we don't believe you.
Fine, you can make that choice.
But I'm telling you, I have to believe this.
And then there's some weird stuff going on.
I don't really get exactly what's happening here.
People on the right who believe it's Israel are arguing very vociferously against that possibility.
And I don't understand it.
I literally have big accounts in my DMs telling me, hey, I'm in contact with people around Charlie and people in the Oval Office, and they think it's Israel and they're really scared.
And then those same accounts are posting on X the claims that it's Israel.
Ridiculous.
There's no proof.
I don't know.
I don't get why.
Again, I'm not going to expose their name either, but it's weird, but it's very weird.
People in DMs telling me they think it's Israel, but they're out there arguing against it being Israel online.
I don't know what that's about.
But I'm just going to tell you straight up.
And the idea that this is in any way anti-Semitic, that that's what it's born from, it's ridiculous.
And just to lay it out there, I talk about Jews the same way I talk about literally everybody.
I talk about Israel the same way I talk about any country that's doing what Israel is doing.
And I have Jewish friends that I'm incredibly close.
I mean, I have Jewish friends I consider like family.
And I talk to them about this and I speak in exactly the same way I do now because I love them.
Because Netanyahu is literally putting all of your lives at risk trying to create the Greater Israel Project.
And it's all part of it, by the way.
It's all wrapped up together.
They need the anti-Semitism.
So they act outrageously in order to create it.
It's a feedback loop that they've started, that they're starting.
So I talked to my Jewish friends, and I went on the Jew case.
It's called the Jew cast with Andrew Meyer not too long ago.
The first thing he asked me, what's the issue with the Jewish community in America?
My answer, you guys have a lot of extremists that are making you look really bad.
The Randy Fiennes out there, the Netanyahu's out there, they're out there saying, I represent all Jews.
If you don't like me, it means that you're an anti-Semite.
Don't let them use you like that.
I've made this joke forever where it's like, you talk about George Soros and George, you know, you're like, this George Soros guy is giving a ton of money to some bad things.
And, you know, he's causing, he's causing a lot of problems in America.
And George Soros leans over to like the Jewish bakery owner and goes, you hear that?
He wants to kill you.
It's absurd.
Don't be the bodyguards for these scumbags and know where they're leading you.
Total destruction.
They're sacrificing you.
They don't give a damn.
Like Alex pointed out yesterday.
Jews who wanted people to go to Israel, Zionists that wanted to drive people to Israel, would bomb synagogues in the 1950s to convince Jews in Europe you're not safe here to get them to go to Israel.
That's a historical fact.
So while, yes, there is a large contingent of the right that, by the way, beef with me all the time, they hate me, and I really can't stand them a lot of time either, who want to make everything about Israel.
And if it's not about Israel, they don't care.
And if they can connect to Israel, then that's all they care about talking about.
I'm not one of these people.
Not the top of my priority list.
Certainly not motivated by any hate of a group or anything like that.
But then there's the flip side.
The flip side is people that will avoid ever talking about Israel because of those other people.
And it's like, why don't you just, why don't we just treat them like any other group?
It's really not hard.
unidentified
They just asked him about Antifa.
harrison smith
All right.
So they just asked Trump about Antifa.
He is still taking questions in the Oval Office.
The crew's monitoring it.
Let's hear Donald Trump's response about Antifa.
unidentified
Are you aware of Antifa?
What comes next after designating Antifa to what we're going to designate too?
donald j trump
But we're going to look at the people that funded Antifa, see who they are, where they came from, and why they did it.
Have you seen Portland at all?
If you take a look at what's happening in Portland, it's amazing.
This has been going on for years.
It's just people out of control.
They're crazy.
We're going to stop that very soon.
We have to get rid of a couple of other problems first.
We're going to get rid of the problems in Memphis where you can't even walk a block without getting shot.
We're going to get rid of the problems in Chicago.
Chicago is a great city, and we have to save it.
We have to save it.
I told you, I had the head of the Union Pacific Railroad in my office, and I said, so what do you think?
You go to every city.
You have railroads in every biggest railroad, beautiful railroad.
He's a great guy.
I said, what do you think?
He said, sir, save Chicago.
Don't let it go down.
Save it.
The way he said it was so meaningful to me.
unidentified
It was so like, it was like terrible.
donald j trump
In a way, it was terrible.
Save Chicago.
Who would ever think that we'd be sitting here talking about saving Chicago?
Chicago's a great city.
They have a terrible mayor.
Terrible.
He's at like 5% approval rating.
He's an incompetent person.
They have an incompetent governor, in my opinion.
He's incompetent.
11 people get shot, and he says crime isn't a good shot.
I mean, they're losing four, five, six people a week getting killed by bullets, by knives.
And then he says how wonderful it is, Chicago.
So, well, it might be wonderful for him.
I think they're afraid.
Look, he's not a stupid guy.
I really believe they're afraid to say politically, I guess, from an ideology standpoint, from a Democratic standpoint.
He's afraid.
He is afraid to say the fact that they have a very unsafe, very dangerous city.
He should say, I'm going to call President Donald Trump, and I'm going to ask him to send in the troops, to send in the National Guard and clean this hellhole up because Chicago can be a great city again.
I'll tell you what, Washington, D.C. is a great place again.
It's booming, and the restaurants are booming.
And six months ago, seven months ago, nobody could go outside.
And even just walking around the White House, people here are thanking me for what I've done.
They're thanking me.
They're saying thank you.
I almost know what they mean because they can walk to work.
And even when they took Uber and they took other forms of transportation, they felt unsafe because the car was hijacked while they're in there.
They take a car and it's being hijacked as they get into the car.
And they did that for safety.
And now we have a safe place.
You know, we've taken 1,500 people out of career criminals have been taken out of Washington, D.C. And we weren't very nice about it.
unidentified
Do you know what I mean?
harrison smith
That's Trump answering a question about Antifa, but he sort of jogged into the overall crime issue.
Of course, Antifa and the overall crime issue are related, but definitely not the same.
I mean, obviously, the reason that crime is so high in many of these big cities is because of the lack of will to actually punish the evildoers, the likes of judges, DAs, Soros appointees, letting people out of prison over and over.
And it's the same people that would let Antifa out over and over.
But these are distinct issues.
And Antifa is not just your run-of-the-mill criminal drug addicts.
They are a highly organized, highly orchestrated, well-funded international terrorist network.
So it needs to be dealt with severely.
Now, he should be signing executive orders today, and I imagine one of those should be designating Antifa as a terrorist organization, as that was the promise he made yesterday.
Now, during the first Trump administration, Attorney General Bill Barr said the DOJ would use its regional FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force to identify criminal organizers and instigators of violence during the George Floyd protest, including Antifa.
I think the latest with those is that everybody they arrested was then released and got a settlement to receive $20,000.
Pretty sure, last I heard, the people that were arrested during Black Lives Matter riots in Philadelphia and New York and Seattle and other major cities sued the cities and won and have now received giant payoffs because actually our tax money has been paying for these groups, facilitating them rather than fighting them.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
We got a lot of videos to show you this segment, a lot of things to talk about, and then we'll be joined in the next hour by Lisa Logan talking about the social-emotional learning, the demonic mindset that has been very systematically ingrained into our education system.
Very excited to talk to her.
And then we have a pre-recorded interview with Australian pop star Aya May, who of course had the really breakout hit Carmageddon.
She's been working on some more music talking about some more controversial topics.
And we had a very fun conversation.
We had to pre-record though because she's in Australia and that's like a million miles away in a different time zone.
I want to go to some videos here, sort of completely different topics, sort of shifting over a little bit.
In fact, guys, I don't know if you can grab one of these videos.
I think the first video from this article from Vigilant Fox, but it's also on Infowars.
Rand Paul dismantles ex-CDC chief in brutal Senate showdown.
And he's asking this woman, Dr. Susan Monarez, about the COVID vaccine and basically just rakes her over the coals about it, which is very good to see.
And we're seeing a lot of really positive developments in the health world.
CDC panel votes to push back MMRV vaccine recommendation to four years old.
So they used to recommend that tiny babies get the combined mumps, mubella, mumps, rubella, measles, like all the vaccines at once, the MMRV vaccine all at once.
And they decided maybe that's not the best thing to give to little tiny babies.
Now, one of the reasons they give it to babies so young and in a combined fashion is if they think that you are likely to miss appointments or not get your child vaccinated on a routine schedule, then they'll just give them all the vaccines at once on the assumption that you're not going to come back in, which can overload your child system and is much more dangerous.
But they're more interested in getting the vaccines into the child's blood than actually protecting them from anything.
So we're seeing some positive developments there.
And I want to go to some of those videos.
But on the other hand, the developments on the facilitating of death side of healthcare, I don't even know how to intro this.
I don't even know how to intro this story, to be honest with you.
I was like, oh, healthcare.
I'll talk about the CDC and then I'll go to the, you know, suicide topic.
But I don't know what the bridge is.
I don't know how to connect these stories.
All I know is that while America is trying to claw back its healthcare system from the moneyed interests that have destroyed it largely, places like Canada and the UK are going with a whole other tack.
They've got a whole other set of priorities.
And they're very disturbing.
So let's go now to this first clip, 29.
This is a woman who was running a hospice in Canada when she suddenly found herself under fire from the Canadian government.
Let's watch.
del bigtree
That was everybody.
unidentified
It's everybody.
Wow.
So we, we did have a public partner partnership, a public-private partnership with the Fraser Health Authority.
Okay.
And we were told in our hospice.
So I became the president of the Delta Hospice Society.
And we were told because we had a hospice that we operated, a facility that we actually built.
We fundraised $8 million.
We built it.
We got a land lease for 35 years.
We built those buildings on it.
We were told that if we want money, we're going to have to start killing our patients.
And we said, well, we're not killing our patients.
We're palliative care.
We don't do that.
del bigtree
Right.
The whole point is to just ease the suffering as they go through this experience.
unidentified
Live well.
Until your natural end, which we could help you with.
Yeah.
Right.
And so they said, well, you're not getting any more money.
And we said, that's fine.
We don't want your money and we don't need your money.
del bigtree
Wow, okay.
unidentified
Right?
We had, we're sitting on this land with our buildings, so we had 25 years left on that land lease.
So as soon as we started to resist and be defiant, not get into lockstep, they canceled that lease with 25 years left.
del bigtree
Wow.
unidentified
Right?
They evicted us from our buildings, took our money away, and basically took our facility from us, kicked us off the land, and expropriated those buildings, $8.5 million worth, to the government.
So the government walked in, started to operate our hospice with us gone.
and provide euthanasia there.
Jeez, that is absolutely outrageous.
del bigtree
And it does fit into this model we're seeing where they will shut down a bank account.
They go against the lease that's been signed.
What good is the lease if it doesn't protect the population for the, then you've invested that funding and money in them knowing you're going to be there for a period of time.
And all just because you're like, we're not going to offer death as one of the options in our hospice.
unidentified
So you are now compelled.
See, and this kind of made, right, is conquest and then compel.
That's the dance.
That's the modus operande that they're using.
I'm going to pull in the other clip you were talking about.
I just need about 20 seconds.
By the judiciary.
Yeah.
Right?
And all of our court, our courts and our judges are appointed in Canada, appointed by the government.
Yeah.
del bigtree
And so the government is controlling the whole thing.
Where is the media coming to this?
Why is the media not pushing back?
I mean, because, I mean, here, I mean, I know here we have pharmaceutical control of our media, so we'd be kind of screwed here, but you don't have that in Canada.
unidentified
No, we have government control of our media.
The government gives the media billions of dollars.
So basically, it's, you know, I joke kind of not really, that is like Soviet-style provda.
del bigtree
Yeah.
unidentified
That's our media.
del bigtree
So none of the television stations, they all get government funding.
unidentified
They all get money.
But particularly the CBC.
del bigtree
Yeah.
unidentified
That's the CBS.
harrison smith
That's like the BBC for Canada.
So just to recap, in case you missed what she just said, that woman owned a hospice for palliative care.
People who are close to death went there to be comfortable and to be cared for until they passed away naturally.
The Canadian government came in, said, you have to provide assisted suicide.
They refused.
So first the government said, we're going to take your money away.
They said, that's fine.
We don't need government money.
Then they just kicked him out of the building, took over the lease, canceled it, took over the practice, and started killing the patients.
Again, the number one cause of death in Canada last year, I'm pretty sure, was doctor-assisted suicide.
It's at least very high up the ranking, and it's tens of thousands of people.
And I just want you to sit with that first.
I mean, I just want you to really understand, like, when we talk about humanity versus the anti-humans, good versus evil, life versus death, it's not a vague thing.
It's not something you have to interpret.
It's very real.
It's very real.
And the side of death will tell you why they're doing it.
And it has nothing to do with the claims that they like to make.
In fact, I saw an article today that was like, Canada could save a lot of money by killing people earlier.
It's beyond absurd.
It's one of these things where like, I should be yelling about it, just try to get through to people like how crazy this is.
But like, if you can't tell how crazy this is, I don't know if me yelling can get through to you.
That the Canadian government will not let you run a hospice if you don't kill your patients.
And they're offering made medical assistance in dying, aka being murdered by a doctor, for things like being poor, mental illness.
They're trying to offer it to children, or as they put it, mature minors.
And this is the end result of whatever this is that we're fighting, whatever you want to call this force that Infowars has arrayed itself against.
This is sort of the ultimate expression of that.
Now let's go to the next clip.
This is in the UK.
This is in their House of Parliament, a guy explaining that assisted suicide and all of these other anti-life programs, they are in fact intended and designed for population control.
Let's watch.
unidentified
That's a minor change compared with this century's growth in the world population from 6.1 billion to 8.2 billion.
A 25% increase in 25 years.
But just think what the 2025 numbers would be if abortion had not been legalized or there had not been white-skilled usage and advocacy of contraception.
And indeed, the growth of homosexuality throughout society has reduced the number of children we would have had the churches this night.
A very much bigger population presently facing the difficulties we have with climate change.
harrison smith
Ah, yes, climate change.
unidentified
Yes, we must deal with climate change by increasing the murder rate.
harrison smith
We can get them when they're old.
We can get them when they're young.
How do we get them in the middle?
We start World War III.
So there he is, literally celebrate, going, how much worse would the population be if we didn't have abortion, if we didn't have contraceptive.
Of course, the only people that are subjected to this are their own people, right?
You look at countries in Africa, India, Southeast Asia, they have a birth rate of, you know, four babies to every one person that dies.
I mean, they're exploding, right?
But UK and Western Europe collapsing, not even at replacement level, far from it, in fact.
Nothing's being done to correct that because they want that because that's the outcome of the policies that they put in place on purpose.
That's the design, and that's what they're telling you.
It's sick.
It really is sick.
It's evil.
And I just, I keep reminding people, or I keep reminding, being reminded of it myself.
Think about the fact that our birth rate in America, of all race, colors, and creed, but for Americans, people born in America, our replacement rate has not been met.
We are not having enough children to replace us.
Yet, at the same time, there's a major housing shortage.
And especially in Texas, we're building neighborhoods so fast, we're sucking the springs dry.
Like rivers are going dry because we're pumping all the water out before it gets to the spring to feed or to replenish the supply for these endless neighborhoods.
As far as the eye can see, the same tacky boxes filled with people from India.
What are we doing?
How is our population not yet at replacement level?
And yet we're expanding so much, we're sucking the springs dry.
Do you not see a major problem here?
And of course, we can get into why that is and how the entire economic system is basically a giant Ponzi scheme.
But that's another aspect to this.
We have a video about the way that BlackRock and all these other organizations are now getting access to your funds all over Europe, retirement funds.
We'll go to clip number 33 here, because this is, again, in the EU, Ursula van der Leyen.
Now, the last guy we saw is predicating all of this death, all of this designed suicide or abortion or contraceptive, all this just limitation of human procreation.
It's all being predicated on the charge of climate change, which is kind of passe.
We're kind of not into that anymore.
In fact, Ursula van der Leyen, during her State of the Union speech to the EU, used to always be about climate change.
This time it was about war.
It was about we're about to go to war.
We need to be on a war footing.
And that's what they're all about now.
Which, you know, if you want to talk about one thing, that's probably the worst than anything for the climate.
It would, in fact, be war.
But they never believed in climate change anyway.
They don't give a crap.
They just want you dead.
And climate change is the excuse that you need to let them kill you.
It's like, I don't even know how to deal with this level of evil.
It just is constantly spilling out of these organizations.
Let's go now to clip number 33.
This is a speaker talking about Miss Von der Leyen taking all of their money to spend on war.
Let's watch.
unidentified
Ms. von der Leyen needs money.
800 billion euros for weapons.
And now we've heard that private savings need to be turned into investment.
And we're calling it a savings and investment union.
It's just fraudulent labeling, really.
What she actually wants is to give more money away, namely money from our citizens.
Savings accounts are going to be plundered.
And we Germans know very well how reliably you behave with taxpayers' money.
We saw when you were in Germany what was done and that there was systematic violations carried out.
Millions of Euros went where they shouldn't have.
In fact, there was even an inquiry committee set up looking at what happened.
You, Ms. von der Leyen, instead ran away to Brussels.
And you're continuing to do exactly the same as you have in the past, spending billions of euros on vaccines.
And here again, we're seeing all of the information hidden, everything hidden.
All of your messages on your mobile phone magically disappeared.
This is not something we should see happening.
Never should this woman be able to invest our money.
Never should she be able to get her hands on citizens' savings.
We do want to bolster the army.
We do want to have good investments.
However, we shouldn't have billions given away by text message.
harrison smith
So, do you understand how what's happening in America is happening worldwide?
We just had this.
We had Tiffany Sianci on it sounding the alarm bells.
And then after the vote passed and the bill was signed, saying, well, we just crossed over the edge.
We just crossed the line.
We're just went over the cliff.
Now we're just waiting for the impact.
And that was opening up retirement savings accounts to places like Goldman Sachs and BlackRock to plunder, to invest your money.
But they're just taking your money.
They'll invest it.
They'll take the profit.
But if they lose, it'll be your money that gets lost.
I mean, this is happening worldwide at a pace.
And whatever they need to say to justify it, they'll say.
In the case of the EU, they need money for war.
Can't go to war without the appropriate amount of money.
So they're going to be plundering your retirement savings for that.
Here is about opening them up for investment, supercharging the economy.
But it's the exact same thing.
Now they're introducing digital ID, of course, across the board, which will come with a digital Euro, digital dollar, which will be the easiest thing for them to plunder.
In fact, the way they're going to do it is have expiring money just to make sure that you aren't able to save up enough to make a down payment on a house.
There won't even be down payments on house because you won't be able to afford them because they'll all be rental anyway.
They are remaking the entire world right in front of us, destroying ownership even of your own money so they can have access to total control over everything that you ever do by having transactional oversight over every dollar that you spend.
It's a social credit score, like even worse, even crazier.
At least in China, you can still get on a train.
It's just the slow train.
You know, the UK is the number one country in the world for arrests for speech violations.
And the next highest one is like, I don't know, some third world country you've never heard of.
And it's like a third of the amount of people arrested for their speech, as in Britain.
12,000 people a year get arrested for their speech in Britain.
That's like one every couple hours.
Somebody's arrested for things that they said in Britain.
It's the number one censorship program in the entire world.
Europe has abandoned its principles.
It's abandoned its foundational morals.
And I don't think it realizes it yet.
I think it's still like acting as if it still believes these things.
It doesn't.
All that stuff is passe.
Free speech born out of Europe, born out of revolution after revolution in the UK, in England at the time, starting with the Magna Carta 1,200 years ago.
I mean, the European civilization is something that people have fought and bled and died and suffered to build over a thousand years, and we're just giving it up.
It took a thousand years to build this house, and we're letting them take a sledgehammer to it.
It's outrageous.
Now, on the topic of health, Europe and Canada are firmly in the belief that suicide is the best medicine.
Luckily, here in America, we're going the opposite direction.
Rand Paul had a showdown with the ex-chief of the CDC questioning her about the efficacy or viability of the COVID vaccine.
And of course, she has absolutely nothing because everything they ever said about it was utterly fraudulent and was only allowed to be said because they literally changed the definition of vaccine so they could claim this was a vaccine.
I mean, the explicitness with which they did this is truly something to behold.
Here's Rand Paul questioning ex-CDC director Dr. Susan Monarez about the COVID vaccine.
unidentified
Does the COVID vaccine prevent transmission?
The COVID vaccine can reduce viral load in individuals who are predicted.
Does it prevent transmission?
When you have reduced viral load, you will have reduced transmission.
But in other words, it doesn't prevent transmission.
You can still transmit the virus if you've had the vaccine.
In fact, there's been reduced ability to interfere with transmission over time.
And what we've found is the most recent one since Omicron is down around 16% reduction if there is a reduction.
Does the COVID vaccine reduce hospitalization for children under 18?
It can.
It doesn't.
The statistics are inconclusive.
And the reason you can't prove that it does is there's so few people under 18 that go to the hospital.
The numbers are extraordinarily small.
There's like 76 million kids under 18 in our country.
183 died, and a few thousand went to the hospital in 2020 and 2021.
And since then, the numbers have dropped precipitously.
And the idea and the issue needs to be discussed.
But the COVID vaccine is not reducing hospitalization.
It's not statistically significant.
Does the COVID vaccine reduce the rate of death for children under 18?
It can.
Once again, it can.
That's a ridiculous answer.
No, it doesn't.
And there is no statistical evidence that it does reduce the death rate.
These are statistics.
We've looked at it.
harrison smith
I don't know about you, but I couldn't help just stare at her face.
Can we play that again?
Keep the audio down.
Just watch her face.
Just look at the smug smile she has on her phone.
I'm trying not to curse.
Crap-eating grin, the smirk she has on her face as she is confronted with the facts that Rand Paul has that there is no justification for the COVID vaccine, especially amongst people under 18.
She's just smirking at it.
It sort of reminds me of, oh, what's his name?
The smirk from the FBI struck.
Peter Strzok.
Similar kind of vibe.
Kind of a smugness that comes with feeling totally untouchable when it comes to blatantly lying to the face of Congress over and over again.
She doesn't care.
You think she genuinely believes that the COVID vaccine?
I mean, honestly, do you think she believes that?
Do you think she thinks that the COVID vaccine can lower transmission or is good for people under 18?
There's no reason for her to believe that.
Rand Paul's got all the stats.
It doesn't show anything.
So what is her belief based on?
She's make it up.
She doesn't have stats to back up her claims.
Rand Paul has stats to back his claims up.
She says it can.
She puts on the little smirk.
It's like she's trying not to laugh.
It's like stupid whore.
I don't know what else to say about it.
The incredible side effects of the COVID vaccine, the heart conditions it can give young men, like myocarditis, which has a 50% death rate in the first five years after you get it.
And the likelihood of getting it skyrockets as soon as you get the COVID vaccine.
And yet she's feels untouchable.
Where are the Nuremberg trials?
Why do we have so much evidence of their malfeasance and none of them have paid any price for it yet?
Again, the stats Rand Paul is reading are devastating.
And it proves beyond any doubt whatsoever that these people peddled a poison to the people of the United States.
And they're there smirking at us as the stats are read off in front of them.
Where are the Nuremberg trials?
These people committed crimes against humanity and they're still committing them to this day when it comes to the COVID vaccine.
Why are they sitting there smirking at us?
So good on Rand Paul.
There's more videos from this confrontation.
And they only get more outrageous.
He moves on to the hepatitis B vaccine.
He talks about myocarditis, saying that somewhere between six and eight in 10,000, but that's much greater than the risk of hospitalization or death, which are not even measurable because they're so small.
So the likelihood that you get myocarditis is significantly higher than actually having to go to the hospital for the vaccine.
And if you get myocarditis, you have a 50% chance of dying in the first five years.
And this woman is peddling this crap and smirking when these stats are said to her.
You can go to infowars.com to find the article with all the videos posted there.
And go to thealxjonesstore.com to support everything that we do here.
And of course, right now is a fantastic time to go.
Life is fiery with its beauty one-year anniversary fundraiser sale.
The Alex Jones store has been online for one year now, and we're celebrating by giving you massive discounts on things like the shirts and hats.
Hats and shirts are just $25 instead of the regular $35 plus.
We're giving everybody a free $11 to spend on the store this week only.
No code required.
It's just automatically applied to any orders over $75.
Join the VIP Club.
Go now.
The AlexJonesStore.com.
Keep us on the air and in the fight.
chuck grassley
Now I'd like to call the committee's attention to something I'm going to share with you, information about the FBI's that's never been made public before.
jon bowne
Operation Arctic Frost has emerged as the chilling embodiment of partisan warfare.
chuck grassley
Arctic Frost was the FBI case opened and approved by anti-Trump FBI agent Thibault.
Arctic Frost then became Jack Smith's elector case against then Citizen Trump and now President Trump.
These new records show that Arctic Frost was much broader than just an electoral matter.
The case was expanded to Republican organizations.
unidentified
Thomas Wyndham and Leanna Saylor pushed Arctic Frost forward despite warnings from career agents that this might be illegal.
The Biden White House Counsel's Office even coordinated, and we're going to talk a lot about this because these people belong in jail, even coordinated to hand over Trump and Pence's government phones, bypassing the National Archives and the law.
jon bowne
Launched in the spring of 2022 under the watchful eye of then FBI Director Christopher Wray, this so-called investigation was born from the venomous bias of anti-Trump zealot Timothy Thiebau, who bypassed protocols to unleash a probe claiming a multifaceted conspiracy to upend the 2020 election.
unidentified
The FBI takes allegations of election-related violations of federal law seriously.
cheryl casone
That agent, now out of the agency, Timothy Thibault, was reportedly escorted out of the Washington field office on Friday after, quote, resigning from his post.
jon bowne
What started as a targeted hit on Donald Trump quickly ballooned into a full-spectrum assault on the so-called American right.
eric schmitt
This was part of an effort by the FBI to go after conservative causes and leaders, including Charlie Kirk at Turning Point, as it turns out, including the rag of the Republican Attorneys General Association, RGA, sort of the whole of Republican apparatus, the conservative movement.
We've never seen anything like this in the history of our country.
I don't care you want to talk about Watergate, whatever you want to talk about.
We've never seen anything like this.
They were all in on going after their political opponents and throwing them in jail.
It's chilling.
jon bowne
All while the Biden regime pretended to champion democracy.
john ratcliffe
And Jack Smith, not only did they tamper with that and lie to the court about it, but he's now admitted to the court that he doesn't know how that happened.
He's only offered a number of possible explanations for how that could have happened.
So he's absolutely blown the chain of custody.
And again, he has a prosecutor, lead prosecutor in this case, Jay Bratt, who met with White House counsel and a representative of the National Archives several times in the weeks before Jack Smith was even appointed.
jon bowne
Whistleblowers recently cracked open the vault, revealing how Arctic Frost served as the blueprint for weaponizing federal power against political dissent.
dr john eastman
Well, I didn't know there was an actual list.
I knew that I had been targeted by the Jack Smith team.
The search warrant for my phone that was hand-delivered with sex-armed FBI agents who detained not just me, but my wife, who refused to show me the warrant before they confiscated my phone, who forced my face to look at the phone so they could open it on facial recognition without ever showing me the warrant.
And even after they gave me the warrant, after the fact, it did not include the attached affidavit that identified the specificity supposedly required by the Fourth Amendment.
jon bowne
A sprawling dragnet ensnaring 92 Republican entities, from the beating heart of the Republican National Committee to the strategic war chest of the Republican Attorneys General Association, and even the grassroots firebrand that was Charlie Kirk's Turning Point USA.
Trump political action groups, state-level operatives, and a constellation of right-leaning organizations found themselves subpoenaed, surveilled, and scrutinized.
And not for crimes, but for the sin of opposing the swamp's anointed mad king, Joe Biden.
joe biden
American democracy only works only if we choose to respect the rule of law and the institutions that were set up in this chamber behind me.
jon bowne
A surge of totalitarian lunacy poisoning the Republic.
joe biden
I like my coffee dark.
jon bowne
John Baume, reporting for Infowars.
harrison smith
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
What an appropriate liner for this segment because this really is a story that defines our time.
My guest is Lisa Logan.
You can find her latest work, How Brainwashing Tactics Rejected by Chief CIA psychologist ended up in public schools as social emotional learning.
That's an infowars.com.
She, of course, has been exposing social emotional learning for a very long time.
And I encourage you to go to her YouTube channel, Parentsofpatriots6581.
That's parents of Patriots6581, or find her on X at IamLisa Logan.
Lisa, welcome back to the show.
lisa logan
Pleasure to be back on our new show, Harrison.
harrison smith
Yeah, not so early now.
Hopefully, maybe it'll be easier to connect with our guests now.
But we've had John a few times, and it's usually about this subject.
And your latest article, I think, is perfect for today, for this time period.
It's focused a lot on Charlie Kirk.
And you ask in the first paragraph, how did Charlie Kirk's alleged shooter, Tyler Robinson, go from a regular kid raised in a conservative home in a red state such as Utah to somebody who rejected their family's values to the point he wanted to silence another person's speech he didn't agree with and is now facing murder charges for killing him so he could speak no more.
In a way, it's like, that's the question that I have about America.
It's like, how did we go so wrong?
How did we go from this conservative, upstanding society to just this seething hatred?
And how did it happen so quickly and under our watch?
I mean, I think when you talk about Tyler Robinson and the apparent transformation he went through, it's the transformation America has gone through over the last couple decades.
lisa logan
That's so true, Harrison.
It's sad how much our children have been poisoned against our own country.
And I think, you know, that's kind of when I reflected last week on all the things that were going on.
And obviously I feel terrible for Charlie Kirk and his family and the loss that they feel.
But I felt also very sad for Tyler Robinson's parents, who thought that, hey, you know, we're raising this kid.
He's in a conservative home.
We love America.
And to have him turn his back on all of the things that they taught him as he grew up in their home to, you know, joining furry culture and, you know, wanting to, you know, viewing Charlie Kirk's speech as violence, so much so that, you know, he had to stop it.
And it's incredible that we're here, but I think that the article that I wrote for Infowars kind of tells the story of how are our youth being poisoned against this beautiful nation and our values.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And the title of the article is really striking to me because it mentions that this type of brainwashing that's now being deployed as social emotional learning was rejected by chief CIA psychologist.
Why did he reject this?
I mean, what's this about?
So from what I interpret from that, and of course, I've read the article, so I know, but it's like, okay, this was too intense for the CIA.
This was too much for the CIA mind control people.
So they repackaged it and are now doing it to our children.
I mean, explain what you're talking about here.
lisa logan
Right.
So in the very beginning of the article, I mentioned a 1976 memorandum, and this was the chief psychologist in the medical division of the CIA.
And he's basically saying, I know at the time in the 70s, it was very popular to do these weird group experiences.
So they were called T-groups or sensitivity training, kind of spun out into things called encounter groups.
It was really popular for people to spend a weekend at the retreat center, Esalen, and Big Sur and, you know, do these weird exercises with people and supposedly discover themselves and have this big moment of personal transformation.
But so that was probably why he was asked to decide whether or not this is something they wanted to bring into the CIA.
Now, what I find incredible is that you're right.
The CIA, who was known for like MK Ultra and all sorts of things, was like, no, this is just too intense for us.
And actually decided to say, you know, hey, I don't recommend you bringing this into the agency because, you know, what these groups and the experiences around it do actually help suspend individual judgment.
So, you know, obviously, they didn't want their intelligence officers to be brainwashed, which is essentially what they were saying.
And he actually compares it to brainwashing that's happening in China.
And there was even a congressional hearing, and I note that in my article that happened in 1969 about the harms happening through these T groups.
These were quite popular in something called the National Training Laboratories, and they were training facilitators to lead people through these group experiences.
And what they were finding is that people would experience these T groups and then go commit suicide.
Wow.
Or, you know, they would have a mental break.
And the reason being is that they were literally trying to fundamentally transform who these people were.
You know, we come into this world again, we're raised with the values that our parents instill in us, and we have a certain worldview.
And what was happening was they wanted to change this worldview.
And so they would do this method called, well, Kurt Lewin's change model.
So this whole idea is that you would think of an ice cube.
You would unfreeze your identity, right?
And your fixed worldview.
And now you're water.
Now you can fit any container that it's put in, right?
And then you rephrase that, and now you have a different shaped ice cube, in a sense, right?
So really, what they were doing is that they weren't very good at rephreezing people.
And so they would be left in this very uncomfortable psychological state of cognitive dissonance.
And when that happens, you can literally have a mental breakdown.
And so it's very traumatizing.
And then on top of that, the way that they would unfreeze was they would have people share very personal experiences about themselves and leave them very, very vulnerable.
And so really what we're seeing happen is that this got challenged and then rebrought into our society through social emotional learning in the 90s and put in education.
And you think how unconscionable it is that something that they were questioning because it was very much harming people ended up in our schools with our children in America.
harrison smith
But gee, it certainly makes a lot of sense.
I mean, it tracks with what we know.
So here's the Lewin's change model: unfreezing, changing, refreezing, solidify the change as a new norm by reinforcing it, embedding it into the overall culture.
I mean, there's so many aspects to this that remind me that the phrase I like is, you know, like fractal conspiracy, how it's the same methods that can be used in small groups or even on individuals that then can be applied to entire nations.
And even the word brainwashing, we think of brainwashing as being convinced of something, but if you just look at the word, it's stripping personality.
It's washing the brain.
Then after that, you go in and plant what you want.
But brainwashing was the term that they used when they were talking about some of this stuff was developed in the Soviet Union, and our people found out about it from there and they came up with it.
Say, well, they wash people's brains.
It's like you take somebody's brain, you rinse it off so they don't, you know, their personality is stripped, and then you fill it up with what you want it to be.
And this, you know, relates to the Jonestown cult, and they were doing a bunch of these experiments.
There was a lot of this stuff going on in San Francisco and California throughout the 60s.
And it says in this article, it destroys objective individual judgment.
You mentioned that how the CIA was like, well, we don't want to destroy the judgment of our agents.
So we're not going to do this.
But what does that really mean?
I mean, individual judgment or objective judgment.
I can understand how you can sort of strip somebody of the individual, but how do you strip them of objectiveness?
Like that, that seems like a whole nother level to me.
lisa logan
Right.
Well, Lewin's model really studied the effects of what he called field theory, right?
The idea that you're an individual and you're kind of you're subjected to the fields around you.
And the field of the group experience would basically put pressure on you to change.
And so your objective judgment of what was reality was then influenced by the people around you.
And so this, this, you see this happen all the time, right?
Because social emotional learning isn't the only way these T groups and sensitivity groups continued.
They actually are in DEI trainings.
They're in facilitated groups where they use these Delphi techniques, right?
And they do, you know, you have all these sticky notes and you put them on the wall and you think that you have a say in the thing, but they're really steering the meeting a certain way.
And so they're using all of these kind of like crowd agitator techniques and group trauma bonding techniques.
And what that does is it does strip your defenses of what you think is your true mindset.
And you're then influenced by things around you.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And again, it's just it's what it's what Colts do to their members.
And so how did it make the transformation into social emotional learning?
Because again, I think this is important, especially as we find out more about the suspect in the Charlie Kirk shooting and his association, not just with transgenderism, but like this furry culture that is truly sickening and bizarre.
If you've ever looked into it, I mean, it's really like gross in ways that are hard to even express.
But and so I want to get to that and sort of how we've just been dislocated and the availability of like pornography and what that's doing to people's minds.
But how does how do these T groups, how do they translate into social emotional learning?
What's the bridge between these two things?
lisa logan
Well, it's really a guy named Daniel Goleman.
So a lot of times in these national training laboratories, they would bring in graduate students in psychology and other fields into use the research that was coming out of the national training laboratories and write these papers for them.
And in 1976, I believe Goldman wrote about T groups and goal setting.
Now, one of the, now SEL has transformed.
We'll talk about that more in a minute.
But one of the original intents of the social emotional learning practice was to help children develop positive goals, which sounds amazing, right?
It sounds fantastic.
I want to have children, I want to have my child have amazing goals and set them and feel confident enough to achieve them.
But what it's now turned into is a thing called transformative SEL.
And this very much uses, and I talk about this in the article as well, Robert Lifton's eight criteria for thought reform.
And that thought reform model is how he studied people who were POWs in the Korean War.
He studied people who had come back from China from the universities and had been brainwashed.
And he came up with this criteria of how you control someone's thoughts and behaviors.
And so, yeah, so basically social emotional learning does that now in these transformative SEL sessions, which are really just DEI for kids.
They break them down.
They make them confess their white privilege and their white supremacy.
And then they say, hey, now you can redeem yourself.
You can rephrase by becoming an ally, an advocate.
And so along with that, they have them say, oh, in order to be empathetic to these people who you are in these sessions with who may be historically marginalized or maybe believe that they're a girl and they're really a boy, you have to use their pronouns.
You have to believe they're a furry.
You have to affirm their identity.
And so this is really how it's going down in the schools.
And even if they don't teach this in schools, right?
Say your school is just doing regular old SEL.
These group experiences and just the fact that they are unfreezing and questioning those core values that you're raised with, it still has the same effects.
And so if your child leaves school and has cognitive dissonance, right, they've been told, hey, maybe your parents' worldview isn't correct.
Maybe they lied to you.
And now they're subjected to some furry culture online.
They're going to be that much more vulnerable to adopting this collective worldview because now they're questioning everything.
And so Tyler Robinson, unfortunately, right, even though he was raised in a conservative home, he fell prey to these types of ideologies, probably both through his association with the University of Utah and other college classes, because unfortunately that's a thing.
They're teaching critical theories in college and elsewhere.
And then, of course, this furry culture that he fell to.
harrison smith
Yeah, we'll get into that.
It's all just incredibly bizarre.
Here's how you put it in the article.
It leaves the gutted psyches of kids like Robinson, whose foundational values, they had been fractured with distrust, vulnerable to be brainwashed by collectivist theories or ideologies.
It opens the door for critical race and queer theories, climate change, furry culture, literally anything they're exposed to to take root, whether that be through school, social media platforms, or chat rooms.
And there's so many instances.
I've already mentioned a few, like it reminds me of Jonestown.
They would do these brainwashing techniques, really fascinating stuff with the human psychology where, you know, when the cult would beat somebody, it would make that person more loyal to the cult.
It's not what you would expect, but you can see that manifest and like on the left.
They don't necessarily attack people outside of their group nearly as much as they'll attack people inside their group who show the slightest bit of doubt.
And it's just, again, classic tactical, same thing happens with abusive relationships.
They'll actually get closer to the abuser, you know, despite the fact that they're hurting them.
So many, the Milgram, I think, is it the Milgram experiment that is very similar to what you're describing, where only one person out of this big group of people, only one person is really, you know, ignorant to what's going on.
They'll show a picture of like a triangle and everybody goes around and goes, that's a square, that's a square, that's a square.
And when it gets to the person who doesn't know what's going on, they also say it's a square just because they don't want to be the crazy one that thinks it's a triangle.
The psychological levers being pulled are very basic, very simple, but very devastating.
And the last thing it sort of reminds me of is the experiments that Alex always talks about, the Kintler experiments in Germany, where they would put children with pedophiles on purpose.
And the reason why, if you look into that experiment, because it makes no sense.
Like, well, the German state took kids and gave them specifically to pedophiles, like so they could have sex.
Like it just makes no sense.
But when you look into it, the guy who did it was his dad was a Nazi.
He hated his dad.
And he was like, you know, fascism has to do with sexual purity.
So we'll target that first and we'll destroy sexual purity.
But it's about just going to the basic foundational morality and completely uprooting it and destroying it and making somebody a blank slate.
I don't know if my sort of, you know, train of thought makes sense to you, but it seems like all of these things are all going after the same concept is you just unroot somebody, you rip them out of their place in time and their family, their culture, you rip them out and just have a blank slate.
And what's being fed into that blank slate is just bizarre.
It's just, and it has a lot to do with sexuality.
Why is sexuality such an important force in all this?
That's right.
The ash conformity, ash conformity experiments are the ones I'm talking about, not the Milgram, although that's another similar, something in a similar vein about causing somebody pain if you think a scientist is telling you to do it.
What is it about sex that forms such a central role in all these brainwashing tactics?
lisa logan
Well, I think because a lot of them are rooted in Gnostic and Hermetic ideas, right?
So I think we've talked about this before.
I mean, a lot of this is also very spiritual.
And so in the Hermetic, there's a hermetic law of gender that really literally believes you have two genders trapped in your brain and your physical body is just an expression of one of those.
And so I think a lot of that has to do with the fundamental occult underpinnings of all of this.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And we're sort of seeing that manifest because it can't be a coincidence.
I actually have a story from today from the Daily Wire.
Attempted Kavanaugh assassin now identifies as a transgender woman legal filing show.
So it's like there's this weird phenomenon of transgenders being super violent these days.
Then you've got this furry thing on top of it.
Alleged Charlie Kirk assassin Tyler Robinson played furry shades of gray porn video games online.
I saw somebody post, I think it may have been Martyr Maid earlier, where he was talking about, you know, when I was growing up, and this is true for me, you know, in the 90s, pornography was something that only adults had access to.
And you had to go to some creepy shop at the edge of town or you had to get a, you know, a magazine delivered.
And it was totally inaccessible for the most part to children.
And now kids are growing up seeing this stuff from a very early age.
I don't think parents are even aware of exactly how prevalent this type of stuff is.
And we're just unprepared for this.
I mean, I don't think humanity was ready to have access to this type of material in like two decades.
It's, do we even understand how much this has changed the way like people's minds are developing growing up?
lisa logan
I don't think so.
You know, like you said, it was not, you know, when we were kids, we didn't have access to this kind of stuff.
It's literally at their fingertips.
You know, they can search something wrong on Google and all of a sudden you're down a rabbit hole of crazy images on there.
And all it takes is really one exposure, right?
And then the shock and really, and that's actually, so the same kind of stuff was happening in the governor schools, right?
Where you had kids come out of there and commit suicide and stuff.
It's because they were showing them very shocking material like Harvey Milk, documentaries, and stuff from the Holocaust.
And really, it's like shocking the system.
The same way, I feel like Charlie Kirk's murder.
And then prior to that, the very day before, we see that horrific imagery of that Ukrainian girl getting slaughtered.
And really, the imagery and all the blood.
And it's really, it's traumatizing to us.
It does something to our brains.
And I feel like it's also pushing us into, and I feel like these whole situations, I feel like there are entities trying to push us into a civil war in our country and make us angry at each other when really we should be angry at the people actually doing it.
harrison smith
Right.
And the people actually doing it.
And I noticed this, and I've said it over and over.
The first people I saw celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder, they were like all university teachers.
They were all teachers of some sort.
They were all involved in education or they were nurses.
And it's like, what is it about the prevalence?
Why is the prevalence of this mindset in school so high?
The last things, we're running out of time and I wish we had more time, but we have a pre-recorded interview we're going to go to after you, but we're going to have to have you on again soon.
And I just encourage people to go follow Lisa Logan at IamLisa Logan on X, Parents of Patriots 6581.
Also search your name on Bandai Video and look at our older interviews where we get into all the occult stuff.
We get into the Feltzer Institute and how all this stuff is literally from demons.
I mean, it is crazy.
It corresponds with what we were talking about with Alex Newman yesterday.
But you say in this article, the Chief CIA psychologist notes in his 1974 memorandum that a majority of participants in these group sessions emerged with a conviction they benefited in some way.
I think that's really important.
People would come out of these brainwashing sessions loving it and feeling like they had been improved somehow.
How important is that in how effective this method is?
lisa logan
Well, again, you feel like you have some kind of personal transformation.
I think anytime you're exposed to something new, you think it's shiny, right?
And great.
But really, these people, some of them, over time, the effects would wear off, right?
Hey, you had this great group experience, but you realize it was very temporary.
And now you're left alone and now you're vulnerable because you shared a bunch of stuff about yourself that now a bunch of strangers know.
And I think that really was why a lot of people had these breakdowns as well.
But I do, before we go, Harrison, I do want to talk a little bit, if we have some time, about what I think actually is going on here.
You know, I find it interesting that Ermia, the leader of the queer armed queer SLC movement, was a coder for the Dignity Index.
Now, it's interesting.
This is being, the Dignity Index is being pushed heavily after this assassination.
Two days after, they came up with a toolkit.
They had a whole website called TurningToward.us, which is a play on Turning Point, of course, right?
Well, you and I had talked about in 2022, Biden had that United We Stand summit, right?
He came out with initiative, Dignity.us, which was the website.
That website is now the Dignity Index.
This is the same Biden administration whose FBI was targeting Charlie Kirk's turning point organization.
So when I say the Dignity Index, Charlie Kirk would hate it.
It is a scoring mechanism for speech, and they are training AI to score political and your chat speech, right?
They're going to send you in a chat room with an AI bot.
harrison smith
I'm so sorry, Lisa, we're coming up to a break and we have to go.
But I know we talked about that a lot in our last interview.
So if you want more on that, of course, follow Lisa Logan at Iam Lisa Logan, Parents of Patriots, 6581.
But also check out the last interview we did on American Journal Bandai Video.
Lisa, thank you so much for coming on.
We'll have to have you on for longer.
unidentified
Quit my day job as a white dog.
I'm so dumb with all that shit.
Anything that I own is farming game just makes me sick.
I just wanna buy a house and live in peace and get my bag.
But the world's gonna pull it crazy.
What's this up but a button?
It's cold up on the school boozing down the highway like I'm about to hit the news.
I don't need a museum because I'm singing.
harrison smith
All right, folks, that is the latest song by IMA.
It's a song called Everything is Fine.
IMA is, of course, an artist that went totally viral last year when she, well, she got fired by her company for some lyrics that weren't exactly in line with their message because she told the truth about things like the COVID pandemic that we went through.
That was, of course, called Karmaged and it blew up across the internet.
It was absolutely amazing.
Since then, she's been working her butt off, making more music.
You can follow her on X at IMAMusic, the website ima.com, and her YouTube is Ayamayham.
And welcome to the show, Aya, once again.
iyah may
Hi, so good to be back.
harrison smith
Great to have you back all the way from Australia.
I'm not even sure what time it is right there.
How have things been going for you?
Last we talked, you just released Carmageddon and you'd sort of taken this big leap into being publicly associated with some of these kind of fringe ideas like that COVID, the COVID pandemic was a big crock of crap.
How have you been since we last talked?
iyah may
Yeah, I've been good.
I've been working on a bunch of new music.
It's been a wild time.
It's definitely set my career into an interesting path and I have no regrets.
And I feel like intuitively, I've made the right decision.
So yeah, I'm enjoying it.
All the ups and downs.
harrison smith
Well, I would, I'd agree.
I think you made the right choice after all.
You'd have to sell your soul to be in the mainstream.
And we're way cooler.
And you can actually be more successful as an independent.
So, you know, I think you've got such a good start.
And the music that you make is genuinely good and entertaining.
And the message is good on top of it.
But one thing that I don't think a lot of people know about you, I didn't know about you last time we talked, is that you're a full-fledged medical doctor and you're actually working on the front line during COVID.
Is that right?
And are you still doing that?
Do you still have a foot in the medical industry?
iyah may
Yeah, I do.
So I do it part-time and it funds a lot of my music because music doesn't make me a heap of money yet.
But it is my passion project for sure.
So yeah, I'm still working part-time.
And obviously music is my main baby.
And I did work in the ER and on the front line during COVID.
That was an interesting time.
And I saw things that gave me a lot of inspiration and perspective.
And I feel like I bring that into what I believe in now and what I write in my music.
harrison smith
How so?
I mean, obviously with COVID, you were there, you know, seeing it behind the scenes.
And that's, to me, it seemed like what mostly Carmageddon was about, although you brought in some other topics.
But what is it now that's sort of driving you to keep making music?
What's informing your creative pursuits?
iyah may
Well, I mean, I sing a lot about the current events of the world in my last couple of songs.
And that wasn't always what I was doing with music.
If you listen to a couple of my songs from a while ago, a few years ago, they're completely different.
But the events of the world really inspired me.
And seeking truth myself and singing about it and sharing with others is now really important to me because I feel like we're in a pressing time where the truth is being buried and it's often hard to identify.
And I want to be able to sing about difficult things, challenges, as well as beautiful things in a creative way that can make it more digestible for people and help others to feel less alone.
And a lot of that inspired Carmageddon and then my second song, Everything's Fine.
And I've got an album on the way that I've been working on.
And not all of it is about the news.
Other things inspire me as well, like the human experience and pain and loss and beauty and love.
So we'll see.
harrison smith
Well, it's such an important role musicians play.
I mean, I know it sounds cheesy, but I was, you know, I was just interviewing a comedian and it's like, it's a difficult role to play these days.
Everything is so tense.
Everything is so sort of intense as well.
And, you know, it's hard to make beautiful music out of that or it's hard to make people laugh about these topics.
When you write a song about a current event, are you trying to express how you feel about it?
Are you trying to give people hope about it?
I mean, how do you approach this?
How do you see your music working to help people deal with things?
Is it just letting other people know that there's other people like them?
They're not alone, like you just said, or are you trying to, are you able to put it in a new frame by encapsulating it, encapsulating it in a song?
What's your process when you see a current event turning that into a song, turning your inspiration into a song?
What is the process there?
iyah may
Yeah.
Well, the purpose of Carmageddon was to start conversations and try and promote dialogue and try and highlight a lot of things that were going on and in a neutral way.
Like I don't want to pick a left or a right side.
I don't want to contribute to this division that's just going on and it's crazy in the world still.
It's just to bring to light these issues and give a space to talk about it.
And I mean, there's more and more artists talking about it and singing about it, which is really awesome and really important.
But if I feel something that's close to my heart that I want to share, then I'll put it in a song.
And I really hate injustices and I really want to bring to light a lot of truth.
I mean, yeah, I've spent the last six years, you know, just working and being surrounded by crazy stuff, as so many of us have.
And I feel like I can use my gift from God to deliver this info and just talk about this info even.
And it's not in an attacking way.
Like, I don't feel like I'm a raging person.
I actually am a really hopeful, easygoing person.
And that's just what I do with my art.
Like, I have no beef with anyone who rages for sure.
Like, there's a time and place for that.
But if there's something on my heart or my mind and I want to speak about it, then I feel like I have this beautiful platform and ability with music to do that.
So I will, for as long as I feel inspired or for as long as I feel there is a need in the world.
harrison smith
Yeah, and I wouldn't, I mean, from your lyrics and just from what I know about you, I don't know if I'd call you right wing even.
I mean, your background, how you grew up is super interesting.
We talked about that last time.
People want to find out they can go watch the old interview.
But like, you don't strike me as a right-wing person, but you've got the, you know, the poster of John Lennon behind you.
Music has this protest element to it that's so powerful.
And it seems like now everything coming out of the mainstream, everything coming out of the establishments telling one story.
And if you're telling the other one, you just sort of get stuck over here with us dissidents.
But it's because that's the real art.
I mean, it's not pre-packaged.
It's not given to you by a corporation.
It's speaking out against injustice, as you point out.
I mean, you don't consider, do you even consider yourself right-wing or how would you feel about having that label put on you?
iyah may
Yeah, no, I don't subscribe to labels.
And I live in Australia, so we don't really have the right and left as much as you guys do.
And I mean, I don't care if it's left or right-wing to me.
It's it's whatever is for humanity and for truth to me.
And if that puts me in a right-wing or left-wing box, according to some people, then whatever.
Like, I know that some things I say perhaps is right wing and some is left.
So I'm just like, well, I guess I'm in the middle.
I'm just trying to, I'm just trying to bring truth and light to this, all this crap that's going on in the world.
And I don't care if I'm, you know, I don't feel like I'm in either of one or the one or the other.
And I don't actually like the division that all of it is causing between us.
harrison smith
Right.
No, and I, I, I don't think you have to be in one of these groups.
And, you know, we, we don't necessarily, you know, neatly fit into one of these groups either.
I don't know if anybody does.
But again, your music is a form of protest.
And it seems like now all of the good protest music, all of the really powerful art is coming from whatever you want to call this, the right wing, the dissident side of things, the truth tellers.
I mean, you know, I follow you on X. I know you like retweet people like Russell Brand.
This is another character that you would never expect him to be on the side of Alex Jones and the right wing.
He was this hippie-dippy kind of flowery guy, but something's happened over the last decade or so where if you are a free thinker at all, you're getting shoved out of the mainstream and you're being forced to the fringes and you're sort of looking around for allies and we're all coming together and just trying to tell the truth, even if we approach it from a different perspective.
Have you been surprised about who resonates with your music?
Or have you gotten any reactions that really shocked you to the things that you say?
iyah may
I think, yeah, I mean, I've had a lot of messages and this is something that's really meaningful to me as an artist.
Just thousands of messages from people reaching out just to say thank you for giving them a voice and helping them feel seen.
And I think that is really beautiful.
And yeah, I've connected with other artists, creatives, influencers, whatever you want to call them, which is really cool, who I didn't know before.
And then I've also lost some of my own friends from my lyrics, which is a real shame.
And that was, well, not a huge surprise to me, but when it happens, it's always a shock.
But then I've also gained an amazing group of other friends.
So it's like, I guess you shed your old ways and your old groups of friends naturally.
And you just have to keep following what's right in your heart and your integrity and your intuition.
And naturally, you'll build that crew up again or lose it again.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And it's always so confusing because I think a lot of us have probably been through that where, you know, you, and it's, it's never us.
It's never us like, yeah, screw those people.
I don't want to be friends.
At least it's not for me.
It's like, I would love to still be friends with those people.
They think I'm a monster for some reason, even though I believe the same things I do when we were friends.
You know, something happened in the world around us that drove us apart.
And like when you listen to your lyrics, like, what do they even have problems with?
I mean, how do you deal with that?
Because it's like, all I'm saying is, you know, maybe like, don't kill people in Gaza or like, hey, maybe like we shouldn't hate each other as much.
Like, this doesn't seem so, you know, something to lose a friendship over.
I mean, do you think, do you think it's something in these people?
Do you think it's just the media around them and they've been brainwashed?
Because again, your lyrics, nobody should hate or get mad at unless you're an evil person trying to do evil deeds that, you know, IMA is talking about.
Then you can hate IMA because you're a bad person and she's a good person.
That makes sense.
What is it that drives, you know, friends away from us when all we're doing is trying to tell the truth and love everyone?
It's, I, I try to contend with this and I don't really know what the answer is.
iyah may
Yeah, and I so agree with that loving everyone and bringing people together.
And that's, that's one of my main goals.
I think my lyrics about man-made virus in the chorus.
Obviously, I have a lot of friends who are doctors and some of them confronted me and said, oh, I'm not okay with this.
And I actually cut you off the last six months or so because I just couldn't really deal with these kinds of lyrics.
And I was like, oh man, that's so sad because you're my brother, you know, you're my sister, like, who cares?
Where there's still the same kids from the rainforest in northern Queensland.
And yeah, and then I do speak about Gaza and Israel.
And that, yeah, you know, that's just such a heated topic, as is COVID.
Like all these things for some reason have caused just such ongoing division.
harrison smith
But it did come from a lab.
I mean, but the disease did come from a lab.
So I mean, what, you know, what do you want to do?
Not talk about that?
iyah may
Yeah, like, I don't understand.
There's so much evidence pointing towards that it was all this massive thing created.
But anyway.
harrison smith
Well, and so you're still living in Australia.
You haven't had any legal percussions there, have you?
I mean, I know it can be a little bit intense in Australia.
We've seen, you know, people holding protests and being thrown in jail for it.
Have you had any repercussions for some of your lyrics contradicting the mainstream official government narrative?
iyah may
Well, as you know, I had my management contract withdrawn from, and that's why I'm independent, going my own way, and I'm still independent, left my label, left all of that, doing my own thing, self-funding it, all good.
Yeah, and now I'm having my medical license reviewed.
That's the current thing I'm dealing with because of my lyrics and my lyrics as an artist, as a songwriter, not as a doctor.
So that's happening at the moment.
And I don't know what will come with that, but I think it would look very bad on them for taking away my license if they do.
harrison smith
So is this, so is this like a review that was started because of your lyrics?
Isn't it just like a regular, you have to regularly go back and be re-licensed?
This was something that they started a review because of your lyrics to determine whether to strip you of your medical license?
iyah may
Yeah, so I'll be fully honest.
I don't know what's going to happen or exactly what's happening, where it all came from, but I've been reported and it's a medical, our medical board of Australia because I said man-made virus, watch the millions die, biggest profit of our lives in my chorus.
And I called out the World Health Organization as being a liar in my second verse of my song.
So, yeah, they're saying I'm going to.
harrison smith
I've stripped your medical license from you.
I mean, that's crazy.
iyah may
Well, I'm being reviewed for it.
And it's just, yeah, it's just, yeah, it's pretty crazy, isn't it?
It is crazy.
And it's crazy because we're in a time of free speech, given all the events that have just happened.
It's just like, yeah, it's unreal.
harrison smith
And, you know, to have somebody work so hard.
My sister is a doctor.
And I, you know, I know how hard it is to become a doctor and to strip that away from you.
I mean, that's like, that's like a worse punishment than, you know, going to jail for, I mean, that's, that's, what, seven years of your life at least you've dedicated to this profession that they're going to potentially kick you out of?
I mean, that's, that is a brutal punishment for merely singing what everybody knows to be true.
Do you think it's just a pressure campaign?
Do you think maybe if you promise not to write those lyrics anymore, they'll stop reviewing you?
I mean, what is the danger you pose exactly?
iyah may
I don't know if it's misinformation or misconduct, but that seems crazy to me because that's my artist world.
It's not my doctor world.
harrison smith
Right.
iyah may
And, you know, I practice, yeah, strong ethics and I really care about my patients and I really give a damn.
And I, this is why I do this music because I actually care about the state of the world and about people and their and their health and their well-being.
So it's like very ironic.
And I've had lots of patients tell me that I'm one of their favorite doctors because I like natural health and I like healing and I want to challenge the narrative in some ways, you know?
So I really don't know what will happen, but I faced this in a sense before with losing my management contract for speaking out.
So I'm, this isn't my first rodeo, you know, I know, I know what this is like in a sense, but it is shocking.
And I have worked so hard for my medical license and I still work as a doctor.
So I'm just going to carry on.
unidentified
Wow.
harrison smith
Well, it's, it's just, it's just so unfair.
And it's just such a, to me, it's just a condemnation of how our whole system operates, how your whole system operates.
I mean, it's very much, you know, aligned how this works.
But yeah, they don't want, I guess they don't want somebody calling out the profits that big pharma makes as a doctor.
You're a vector of profit for them.
And if you're telling people that maybe pharmaceutical companies don't have your best interest in mind, I mean, that ain't good.
So I guess it makes sense from a purely cynical perspective why they'd want to, I guess, shut you up, but it just genuinely doesn't make any sense.
And it's just a reminder of sort of how far we have to go to correct some of this stuff.
is australia as bad as as we think it is i mean i have this this image of just uh you know back in in 2020 the concentration camps australians were put in for refusing to get the vaccine and And it just, it's kind of scary to me.
I'm like, man, I would be getting out of there if I could so I could actually speak my mind.
Do you have any plans to come to America or anything?
Or are you sticking it out in Australia there?
iyah may
Well, yeah, I mean, I love Australia.
I'm full-blown Aussie, apart from my mixed heritage.
So, yeah, it's been a crazy time, but I think COVID woke a lot of us up, a lot of people up.
And yeah, a lot of states really suffered during that pandemic.
But I think now people are really starting to stand up for their rights after all the stuff that's going on.
In saying that, though, I love the U.S. and I started my music journey living in New York.
So I'm super inspired whenever I go back.
And I have lots of mates there still.
And I have a trip planned end of this year.
I'll be performing with a friend, Ian Carroll.
harrison smith
Oh.
iyah may
Yeah, you guys, homies.
unidentified
Yeah.
iyah may
So yeah, that'll be cool.
So I'll come over, I think, in like a month or two, and I'll probably stay for a while.
And I would just love to connect with other artists and work on some collaborations and just meet a bunch of cool people.
I'm really looking forward to it.
harrison smith
Yeah, that sounds awesome.
Where are you going to be?
iyah may
Don't know yet.
It depends on when I can get there.
And also, yeah, because Ian's obviously some people consider him a controversial character.
And so he needs to secure the location and sort all that stuff out.
And yeah, I'll have to update you on that, but I'm still waiting.
harrison smith
Well, that's very exciting.
So what is the event going to be?
Do you know?
Because he does, does he play music?
He would.
I could see that.
Is he some sort of musical genius on top of everything else?
Ian Carroll.
I feel like he's got skills he keeps hidden.
iyah may
Yeah, he's a legend.
I've had lots of chats with him and he's a cool guy.
I don't even know what information I can give away right now.
So I don't want to give away too much, but I know that it is his event and it's going to be awesome.
And I'm singing for him.
And that's all actually I know.
So we'll see.
harrison smith
All right.
Well, you better let me know because I want to go to that.
That sounds incredibly fun.
Ian Carroll, controversial.
A little bit.
He's a little bit controversial, but I really don't understand why.
I mean, it's like, it's like your music.
Like, what is controversial about this?
It's true.
It's the facts.
And clearly the people telling you this have good intentions.
Like, I don't see how you could watch Ian Carroll or you could listen to your music and not see that these are people who are at least trying to tell the truth, at least trying to be good people.
Whereas everybody else is so fake, the genuineness I think would convince people that what you're doing is not some sort of threat to their system, but obviously it is.
That's super exciting.
And of course, I want to remind people, go to ima.com, I-Y-A-H-M-A-Y.com, IMA Music on X, and the YouTube Aya Mayhem is how you can find her stuff and support her, folks.
There's no reason why she should have to.
If she wants to, she's welcome to be a doctor.
But we want IMA focusing full-time on music so we can get more incredible, really monumental and I think powerful protest songs because this is something that like I play your music for my family.
There's not a lot of music I like my family to listen to.
Modern music, the lyrics are horrible.
Some of the music that I like, the lyrics is not actually that good of music.
You are able to synthesize both of these things.
The music is actually very good and the message is good.
Please go support IMA.
And so you're doing that one.
Are you going on tour?
When's your tour planned?
When are you going to fill out stadiums?
I think you could do it.
unidentified
Yeah.
iyah may
Well, I've actually got a new song coming in the next month in October.
And then I've got an album that's just finished, sort of what I've been working on.
So I'll drop that as well.
And then I'd love to g up some collaborations with other artists.
There's some artists I've been really admiring lately, Jesse Wells and Wren.
They're such cool guys and what they're singing about.
If you guys, yeah, you probably heard of them.
Yeah.
But yeah, I don't know when a tour will happen.
It's going to happen soon, though.
I'm just going to keep getting all the music out.
harrison smith
It should.
So when are you expecting your album to be released?
iyah may
It'll either be this year or early next year, I think.
harrison smith
And so, like I said, I can tell you're focusing on things sort of outside of what Carmageddon was about, even though that had a couple of different topics.
What's really driving you right now?
Like, what are you paying attention to right now?
When you get online, what's the post that makes you stop and question what's going on?
Because again, I've seen that you're posting some climate change stuff.
I mean, you got a lot of lies to choose from being told by the establishment.
What's grinding your gears these days?
iyah may
Well, I'm a really philosophical person, and I love to write about human experience.
And sometimes I sing about and write about the news.
Other times it's just about the tough things that humans go through in life.
Sorry, I don't know if you can hear the background noise, but someone is blowing a leaf blower here.
It's really annoying.
Sorry about that.
harrison smith
Sounds fine for us.
So you don't live in the rainforest anymore?
iyah may
No, I don't.
I live in Sydney and there's still lots of plants around me.
So that's going on.
harrison smith
Well, that's nice.
iyah may
Yeah, but we'll see.
Like, I've got songs that are about the news.
I'll be making more for sure.
And then I've got songs about life and stuff.
So it'll be mixed.
harrison smith
Well, again, it's great music.
Even if you don't like the message, which you should, you'll still like the music quite a bit.
And, you know, when it comes to that, you know, obviously we're still reeling from the death of Charlie Kirk.
How's that been received overseas?
I haven't even really thought about this until I just asked this question because in America, it's like the world stopped last Thursday.
It's like all we're focusing on.
Is it having a similar impact overseas?
iyah may
Well, it's everywhere online here as well.
And yeah, I mean, if you didn't know about Charlie Kirk before, you do now for sure kind of thing.
It's definitely gone global as far as I can tell.
Yeah.
harrison smith
Yeah.
And, you know, I think that's the exact opposite of what the evildoers wanted by taking him out.
They expected him to go away.
He's only getting bigger and more powerful.
But again, I feel like we're in this sort of like depressed state over here.
And I think we need music now.
We need comedy now, even though it almost feels wrong.
I think it's kind of what we need right now to re-energize and refocus ourselves into what's important.
So I'm so happy that you're doing what you're doing and that we're creating real like good content, good art out there that is political, but it's still something that's approachable by everybody.
I think that's really a valuable tool in the information war.
So I encourage everybody, IMAMusiconX, IMA.com, YouTube, IMA Ham.
Go watch her, check her out, buy her album when it comes out.
Go join the stadium tour whenever that begins.
And of course, join me and them whenever I show up at their show with IMA and Ian Carol sometime later.
When was that?
Did you give us a date?
You said about a month from now, something like that?
iyah may
I'm going to let you know.
And I'm going to give you free tickets to my shows for sure, man.
harrison smith
Please do.
I'd love to join.
I had no idea you and Ian were collabing.
So I'll have to get it.
I'll have to get in on that somehow.
We should make a music video.
I think that'd be very fun.
Well, thank you so much for joining us.
Thank you for joining us in this strange time frame right now.
It's not always easy scheduling an interview with a 12-hour difference.
So thank you for coming on and sharing your stuff.
And we look forward to seeing your album out very soon.
iyah may
No worries.
Thank you for your support, Harrison.
You're a legend.
harrison smith
Oh, thank you very much.
Keep up the great work.
All right, folks.
unidentified
All right.
harrison smith
All right.
That's going to be about it for us.
I will see you guys on Monday morning.
Remember to go to thealexjonesstore.com forward slash Harrison to let him know who sent you.
Buy some merchandise, get yourself a supplement, save the world, save America.
And we'll see you next week.
unidentified
We need funds.
alex jones
We're fighting the globalists at point blank rank.
And they got a receivership hearing with Judge Gore Gamblet ran the Texas show trial next week to send the sheriffs here.
It could be within days next Wednesday.
Shut us down.
And I'm sure we'll get lots of funds then once we're shut down.
Be like, oh, God, he really did need help.
Oh, yeah.
We have been battling and battling and barely surviving.
They've turned the internet off here before.
They had a fake sale to Bloomberg's front group.
Remember all that?
And it was because we didn't give up and the crew didn't give up when I told the crew, no, we're going to beat this, don't go.
And I stayed here and slept here a couple times that we're still here.
And because you bought the products, we had enough money for lawyers to go battle it and beat it.
Everybody listening needs to get off the fence, get off the bench, get up at the plate, and needs to go become a VIP.
$30 a month.
See it as a donation.
You get $40 each month to spend the store.
Sales on top of everything.
Special deals, special offers just to you.
It's insane.
And then if you really just want to support and you don't want methylene blue or turmeric, you're crazy if you don't.
Or ultimate life force, the best cardiovascular spike protein detox.
Everybody should be taking it.
And it's the best.
Ultimate Life Force is the best.
Cardiovascular, heart health, spike protein detoxer.
Every man, woman, and child should take at least one regimen of it and see how you feel.
It does dramatic things.
We have the strongest turmeric.
unidentified
You should get it.
alex jones
And I got a lot of news to cover.
I'm going to sit here and beat that horse, but the news we get out is so powerful and it's that less than 1% of people that buy stuff at the auctionstore.com that make all this possible.
And this fight is your fight.
They want us off the air because they want to shut down focal points of organizations that hold the Trump administration's feet to the fire and warn Trump and warn his advisors and have a big effect and big pull, as the administrations have said, and as the Democrats have said.
They've come after Trump, they've sued Trump, they've had their operatives in there and they see our stuff everywhere.
Step into the zone of history and understand that you are the key.
You are the variable.
You are the Paul Revere's.
You are the resistance.
This dog don't hunt without you.
unidentified
We need funds.
alex jones
We're fighting the globalists at point-blank range.
And they got a receivership hearing with Judge Gore Gamble that ran the Texas show trial next week to send the sheriffs here.
I get it could be within days next Wednesday to shut us down.
And I'm sure we'll get lots of funds then once we're shut down.
Be like, oh, God, he really didn't need help.
Oh, yeah.
We have been battling and battling and barely surviving.
They've turned the internet off here before.
They had a fake sale to Bloomberg's front group.
Remember all that?
And it was because we didn't give up and the crew didn't give up when I told the crew, no, we're going to beat this, don't go.
And I stayed here and slept here a couple times that we're still here.
And because you bought the products, we had enough money for lawyers to go battle it and beat it.
Everybody listening needs to get off the fence, get off the bench, get up at the plate, and needs to go become a VIP.
$30 a month, see it as a donation.
You get $40 each month to spend the store, sales on top of everything, special deals, special offers is to you.
It's insane.
And then if you really just want to support and you don't want methylene blue or turmeric, you're crazy if you don't, or Ultimate Life Force, the best cardiovascular spike protein detox, everybody should be taking it.
I mean, it's the best.
Ultimate Life Force is the best cardiovascular heart health spike protein detoxer.
Every man, woman, and child should take at least one regiment of it.
Field.
It does dramatic things.
We have the strongest turmeric.
unidentified
You should get it.
alex jones
And I got a lot of news to cover.
I'm going to sit there and beat that horse, but the news we get out is so powerful.
And it's that less than 1% of people that buy stuff at the auxiliarystore.com that make all this possible.
And this fight is your fight.
They want us off the air because they want to shut down focal points of organizations that hold the Trump administration's feet to the fire and warn Trump and warn his advisors and have a big effect and big pull, as the administrations have said and as the Democrats have said.
They've come after Trump, they've sued Trump, they've had their operatives in there and they see our stuff everywhere.
Step into the zone of history and understand that you are the key.
You are the variable.
You are the Paul Revere's.
Export Selection