All Episodes
Aug. 22, 2025 - War Room - Owen Shroyer
01:48:05
Deep State in PANIC MODE Following Raid on Swamp Creature John Bolton
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
05:58
m
melody krell
01:22:25
y
yuval noah harari
05:17
Appearances
a
andre hoffmann
01:44
j
james comey
01:05
l
larry fink
02:05
Clips
b
bill gates
00:39
c
chuck grassley
00:50
f
fareed zakaria
00:34
g
george soros
00:33
s
stewart rhodes
00:24
u
ursula von der leyen
00:45
v
victoria nuland
00:59
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
The silent majority is no longer silent.
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
Please stand by for further details.
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
melody krell
Hello and welcome back.
I am Mel Kay sitting in for Owen Schroyer.
Great to see everyone today.
It is Friday, thank God.
A lot is going on and I am honored to be here.
And I will start off with a breaking news.
It appears that the DOJ has released the transcripts of Ghislaine Maxwell's interview.
with Todd Blanche just a few weeks ago, and out of that interview come multiple things, including that she says that she doesn't believe Jeffrey Epstein killed himself.
She also says that Donald Trump had nothing to do with anything.
She has never seen him inappropriate in any way.
She only knew him socially.
Of course, we all knew that, but now we're going to get more information from her, which is a change.
I do want to remind you though that many of the victims say that Ghislaine Maxwell was just as vicious as Jeffrey Epstein.
So for all the people out there that are wondering if she's going to get a pardon or a commuted sentence or anything like that, I would say that the victims would be against that.
In the meantime, we do have a lot of breaking news today on a Friday, of course.
Also, Pete Hegseth has fired Jeffrey Cruz, Defense Intelligence Agency under Biden.
It looks like he is the person who leaked the preliminary report about the Iran attacks and now will be held accountable, we hope.
In the meantime, as everyone knows by now, there was a raid this morning of John Bolton's house.
And as they come out with boxes and boxes, we want to remind you that John Bolton has been around very critical of Donald Trump, though he begged to be in his first cabinet or didn't get put in there.
Donald Trump gave him a job and then of course fired him later.
Just for some context on the Bolton raid, we all remember back when he was being questioned about his book and it was Royce Lambert, the US District Court judge from DC that came out and said that Bolton could have sued the government and sought relief in court.
Instead, he opted out of classification review process before its conclusion.
Unilateral fast tracking carried the benefit of publicity and sales and the cost of substantial reductions.
This was Bolton's bet.
If he is right and the book does not contain classified information, he keeps the up side mentioned above.
But if he is wrong, he stands to lose his profits from the book deal that exposes him to criminal liability and imperil national security.
He went on to say that Bolton has gambled with national security of the United States.
He has exposed his country to harm and himself to civil and maybe potential criminal penalties.
That was a while back.
I do want to remind everyone, he has been around a long time.
He was a participant in the weapons of mass destruction lie that got us into the endless war.s known as the war on terror, specifically Iraq.
He also was against Donald Trump meeting with North Korea.
And of course, that ended well.
He's been a strict interventionist, pushing every war so far that we've seen.
Not to mention that he also wanted preemptive nuclear strikes on Iran recently.
So Bolton is in hot water and this is only the beginning.
What is pretty hilarious to me is that they have already put out talking points on the left, which leaked, of course, because they're not the saying that liberals should support Bolton.
It says for talking points.
The second is that when the chips are finally down, he exhibited courage.
He told the public what he saw.
Another talking point, basically, is that he is maybe not always on the same side as foreign policy wise, but he has always been a good person and in solidarity with the intelligence community.
Of course, that's not a good thing as far as I'm concerned.
On top of that, as you know, federal prosecutors secured evidence from FBI brass that James Comey, in fact, authorized classified leaks.
Again, they declined to charge him.
I actually have a clip of James Comey lying flat out to the American people in a deposition before the whole world that I'd like to play because it revolves around these new documents that came out.
If we can play the clip of Comey being questioned by Chuck Grassley, I think it'll show the world exactly who we're dealing with.
chuck grassley
Director Comey, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?
james comey
Never.
melody krell
Okay, let's jump back to that clip with Comey and then I'll get into what came out today that proves not only that he lied to the American people but that he lied under oath.
Let's go jump to Comey and then we'll come back.
chuck grassley
Director Comey, have you ever been an anonymous source in news reports about matters relating to the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation?
james comey
Never.
chuck grassley
Question two on relatively related.
Have you ever authorized someone else at the FBI to be an anonymous source in news reports about the Trump investigation or the Clinton investigation.
unidentified
No.
chuck grassley
Has any classified information relating to President Trump or his associates been declassified and shared with the media?
james comey
Not to my knowledge.
There have been a variety of leaks.
Well, leaks are always a problem, but especially in the last three to six months.
Look, this was terrible.
It makes me mildly nauseous to think that we might have had some impact on the election.
But honestly, it wouldn't change the decision.
Everybody who disagrees with me has to come back to October 28th with me and stare at this and tell me and tell me what you would do.
Would you speak or would you conceal?
And I could be wrong, but we honestly made a decision between those two choices that even in hindsight, and this has been one of the world's most painful experiences, I would make the same decision.
I would not conceal that on October 28 from the Congress.
And I sent the letter to the Congress, by the way, people forget this.
I didn't make a public announcement.
I sent a private letter to the chairs and the rankings of the oversight committees.
I know it's a distinction without a difference in the world of leaks, but it is it was very important that I tell them instead of concealing.
And reasonable people can disagree, but that's the reason I made that choice.
And it was a hard choice.
I still believe in retrospect, the right choice as painful.
melody krell
And there you have it.
Comey lying to the whole world without any shame whatsoever.
So let's talk about what came out about Comey.
According to the memo that was declassified by obtained by just the news, an investigation by US Postal Inspector Service agents revealed that FBI General Counsel James Baker and Comey's Chief of Staff, James Rubickey, were involved in leaking classified information to the New York Times in October of 2016.
It says that the investigation also revealed Baker disclosed USG classified information to the New York Times under the belief he was ultimately instructed and authorized to do so by FBI director James Comey.
It goes on to say that, for example, during interviews, Baker indicated FBI chief of staff, James Rubickey instructed him, Baker, to disclose the information to the New York Times, and Baker understood Rubickey was conveying this instruction and authorization by James Comey.
So whatever he's saying right now, it is just the beginning of getting to the bottom of that.
Not to be outdone, we have also found out that Ian Sams, who was going around, he was the spokesperson for Joe Biden, touting his mental fitness over and over to all the people.
Well, in his deposition, he comes out to say that he only dealt with in person, Joe Biden, twice in the four years that he worked for him.
But he came out even after the disastrous debate with Donald Trump, which led to him leaving the race, and continued to say that people were making things up.
He also attacked her when her came out after the classified investigation into Joe Biden's classified document handling and attacked her saying that he was making up things and that he was.
He was not clear with what was going on and that Joe Biden was just fine.
On top of that, we find that there were actually people in the Biden DOJ that were questioning the Auto Penn pardons, particularly associate deputy attorney general, Brad Weinsheimer.
He came out and said that when he was going through the pardons, he saw that there was a real problem because the K. Jean Pierre and others were saying that he was pardoning people that had minor offenses.
In this White House document that came out, the lawyer says one other important note in communication about the commutations.
The White House has described those who received commutations as people convicted of nonviolent drug offenses.
I think you should stop saying that because it is untrue and misleading.
As you know, even with the exceedingly limited review we were allowed to do of the individuals we believe you might be considering for commutation action, we actually identified nineteen people that are highly problematic.
He goes on to say that, again, these people did not meet with Joe Biden and they did not get full information on why these people were chosen for commutations or pardons.
And again, this leads to the idea of does Joe Biden even know who was pardoned, how they were pardoned?, why they were pardoned, or did this come from somewhere else?
It has been an exceedingly bad week for the Clintons, I would say.
First and foremost, Bill and Hillary Clinton, according to the investigators that are looking into Jeffrey Epstein now, Bill Clinton is number one on their list to speak to.
James Comer said he is very interested in hearing from both Hillary and Bill Clinton, but specifically Bill Clinton.
He goes on to say while the department undertakes efforts to uncover and publicly disclose additional information related to related to mister Epstein and miss Maxwell's cases, it is imperative.
Congress conducts oversight of federal government enforcement of sex trafficking laws, generally and specifically its handling of the investigation and prosecution of mister Epstein and miss Maxwell.
He goes on to state that the Clintons have never been questioned and that he looks forward to speaking with them.
Following that, we find out that Hillary Clinton is facing an ethics review of her law license.
It seems a little late for that, but it turns out that right now there is a formal review of the conduct of Hillary Clinton, a licensed attorney in the state of Arkansas in connection with her actions during the 2016 presidential campaign.
The complaint alleges that Hillary Clinton's campaign elevated unverified, unvetted information to hurt her political opponent.
This revelation demands an already overdue inquiry into Hillary Clinton's fitness as a member of the Arkansas Bar.
If that's not enough already, we found out this week also that the IRS began investigating Hillary Clinton, as many of us knew and were watching Huber at the time in 2019.
But a memo circulated that said to lay off that we can't talk about the Clinton Foundation years after the FBI was forced to shut down multiple corruption.
probes in Bill and Hillary Clinton's charity, the IRS under President Trump began a criminal tax investigation into the Clinton Foundation and its dealings with other players on the global charity stage, but then abruptly stopped working with whistleblowers in 2019.
According to IRS memo and internal emails, can't talk about Clinton Foundation.
A memo said in recounting how IRS agents suddenly cut off contact with the whistleblowers Moynihan and Doyle who have been fighting all these years to get this information out.
As we know, the Clinton Foundation has been under a lot of scrutiny in the meantime.
What we know for sure is that the Clinton Foundation was attached to things in it, not just Haiti, but Beyond Borders Organization, USAID, Act Blue, Soros Open Society, and many other operations along the way.
We have to remember that we still have intact the International Organization Immunities Act, which needs to be scinded.
It's from 1947, is giving the BIS, the World Bank, the IMF, the UN, all the tentacles of the UN, 63 banks connected to the BIS, including our Fed, not to mention all of the NGOs that are connected to the UN in any way, which may include some of the Clinton NGOs as well.
We know Bill and Melinda Gates.
Gavi is connected to that, and they all have immunity from oversight almost completely.
Particularly, they do not have liability to lawsuits or audits or investigations.
If President Trump really wants to do something very big about the public-private partnership that rules above our nation, scinding the International Immunities Act for international organizations from 1947 would be a great start.
Again, some of us, most of us, looked at John Huber's investigation into the Clinton Foundation and had high hopes, but then they failed to ever get a grand jury, as far as we know, to this point.
So it looks like this is coming into play now.
We also have a whistleblower that has come forward, an anonymous whistleblower that says he worked for DNI twenty fifteen to twenty twenty.
And he told John Durham he stumbled upon enigmatic data while leading the investigation of alleged Russian cyber activity for the intelligence community assessment on Russian meddling in twenty sixteen.
He said that discovery took place in December twenty sixteen when President Obama ordered the ICA.
He goes on to say it seems only brief interaction was occurring.
In some cases, no authorized access or even attempted access was detected.
Although the suspicious activity initially was attributed to foreign actors, there was no analysis to prove that there were any foreign actors involved.
Of course, many of us have believed that all the time.
But in the meantime, the Clintons are having a bad week.
To continue that bad week, we find that the FBI has exposed nineteen hidden Clinton Foundation bank accounts, not to mention that the Clinton family has approximately fifty plus organizations.
So besides the Clinton Foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, Clinton Climate Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative, there are 48 other foundations, funds, LL, LLC and shell companies connected to the Clinton family.
Many of them are unclear, but we do know that one of them that came out of the investigation, the Clinton Foundation in four different states found in the IG report that Hillary Clinton and Foundation had crimes against children.
It does not indicate which foundation they are referring to, but of course, much of that evidence is on the Anthony Weiner laptop.
The Anthony Weiner laptop supposedly is still out there, but we never got the information and have only recently found out that it was never really searched beyond the original NYPD search.
There are apparently flash drives out there that have all the information that we could want, and yet they are still not releasing that to this day.
I also want to remind people that Jeffrey Epstein in his testimony under oath said that he started the Clinton Foundation.
But something you might not know about the Clintons going back to MENA, Arkansas is that the Clintons were involved in the Iran Contra activities at the Arkansas MENA airport, and that that was a front for CIA Southern Air Transport, and it occurred while Bill Clinton was governor just a few years into Clinton's presidential administration.
Wexner and Jeffrey Epstein would buy Southern Air Transport and relocate it to Columbus, Ohio, where Les Wexner's L Brands was located, leading concerns among Ohio officials that both men were not only working with the CIA, but that Wexner's company might be linked to the CIA.
That's something many people have not talked about and is still under question.
Not to mention, as usual, Hillary Clinton's emails and the Chinese Energy Fund Committee.
So we are talking about a major investigation being reopened into the entire Clinton Foundation, while we are opening an investigation into Jeffrey Epsteinin and his relationship, finally, with the Clintons.
I do want to remind everyone that the Hillary Clinton email scandal was never resolved.
James Comey and the rest of them, Sally Yates and others, buried it.
We know about the tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton and Loretta Lynch that was very shady to begin with, and then they ended the investigation.
But in 2018, the ICIG report detailed a deep dive into metadata of Hillary Clinton's emails, which allegedly revealed that copy of nearly all the emails were forwarded in real time to a known Chinese public company that was involved in collecting intelligence for China.
The report, as I'll remind you, in 2018 said that the Chinese company that gained access to Clinton's emails was not a technology firm.
Rather, the sources explained that it was a front group for the Chinese government located in Washington's Virginia suburbs.
And again, this links Hillary Clinton back to that, but we also know that CEFC was related to criminality, it looks like, with Joe Biden's family as well, particularly with Hunter Biden.
So at this point, the Clintons are kind of on the run.
And yet we just found out that Donald Trump has sent Marines and Cruisers down to Venezuela, which is interesting.
because another thing that we should be looking into with the Clintons is their Island initiative.
So the Clinton Foundation and Richard Branson started something called the Ten Island Challenge that was around Haiti.
Haiti was a favorite place of the Clintons.
I believe they went on their honeymoon there.
So they started a Ten Island Challenge in tandem with the United Nations that included Haiti, Dominican Republic, Jamaica, Aruba, Bahamas, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, Colombia, Kenya, and Tanzania.
What was this about?
It was about bringing those ten islands up to standards of travel, not just putting in portss, but also putting in internet and all kinds of contractors came in that are connected to the Clintons.
In the end, twenty one islands were connected in this Clinton Global Island initiative.
And again, we also found out last week that not only that, but George Soros and his Open Society was very involved with the Hillary Clinton scandal.
It turns out Leonard Bernardo, a top George Soros Open Society Foundation official and communications director to the Clinton Foreign Policy Advisor during the Clinton campaign, Julian Smith.
Julie and Smith both were involved in the scandal, both were perpetuating it.
And in an email, Bernardo from Open Society wrote, Hillary Clinton has approved Julia's idea about Trump and Russian hackers hampering US election.
That should distract people from her own missing emails, especially if the affair goes to Olympic level.
The point is making the Russia play a US domestic issue.
Say something like a critical infrastructure threat to the election to feel menaced since both POTUS Obama and v POTUS Biden have acknowledged the fact that intelligence community would speed up the search for evidence that is regrettably still unavailable.
Bernardo continues to say, in absence of direct evidence, CrowdStrike and ThreatConnect will supply media and Russian main intelligence directive will hopefully carry it on.
So again, I'm not surprised that George Soros was involved in that, but what you should also know is that we are dealing with a situation in the world right now connected to Russia Gate that is not being fully exposed, which is what was going on since Obama and his inner circle and the CIA, USAID, National Endowment for Democracy, and the crooked State Department overthrew the duly elected president in Ukraine in 2014.
We all saw John McCain and Victoria Nuland and Klobuchar and all these people over there cheering on a throw-in of the elected government, putting in their own government.
So I wanted to remind people that all of the things that have happened with RussiaGate really hurt Donald Trump's ability to do any kind of detent with Russia.
Then when RussiaGate closed after the fake cover up known as the Weisman Mueller investigation, they kicked right off with Ukraine.
So Trump couldn't really deal with Ukraine either.
Then the fake Ukraine impeachment.
So I wanted to remind people of what really happened back in 2014.
First, I want to play a clip of George Soros back talking about his involvement in Ukraine since back in 1993.
I want to remind you that George Soros wrote his document, NATO World Order in 1993 after we had promised Russia that we would not expand NATO.
Shortly after that, Bill Clinton started expanding NATO.
So let's take a look at George Soros talking about his involvement in Ukraine all the way back then.
fareed zakaria
George Soros, pleasure to have you on.
george soros
Same here.
fareed zakaria
First on Ukraine, one of the things that many people recognized about you was that you during the revolutions of 1989 funded a lot of dissident activities, civil society groups in Eastern Europe, in Poland, the Czech Republic.
Are you doing similar things in Ukraine?
george soros
Well, I set up a foundation in Ukraine before Ukraine became independent of Russia.
And the foundation has been functioning ever since.
And it played an important part in events now.
fareed zakaria
Do you think Ukraine will be able to assert a kind of independence from Russia and an alignment with the West?
Not a specific alignment as a NATO, but a kind of orientation toward the West.
Will the foundation move towards the West or will the Russians always stop them?
george soros
No, Putin will try to destabilize Ukraine.
The foundation has been functioning ever since and has played an important part in events now.
melody krell
Well, let's understand right now that this has been going on since the nineties.
When NATO was expanded, it is not a defensive force.
We should not, in my opinion, be in NATO.
We are not part of Europe.
We don't need to protect Europe.
We need to protect our country and reprioritize our nation.
And on top of that, who really has been running Ukraine since 1990?
since the overthrow of that government, since, you know, George Soros was the most powerful man in Ukraine before that.
Let's see the clip from Victoria Nuland telling you exactly who's been running Ukraine since 2014.
This is, I believe, from that time period.
Let's take a look at Victoria Nuland before the break.
victoria nuland
And US advisors serve in almost a dozen Ukrainian ministries and localities, helping to deliver services, eliminate fraud and abuse, improve tax collection, and modernize Ukrainian institutions.
With US help, newly vetted and trained police officers are patrolling the cities, the streets of eighteen Ukrainian cities.
In courtrooms across Ukraine, free legal aid attorneys funded by the US have won two thirds of all the acquittals in the countries.
Treasury and State Department advisers have helped Ukraine shutter over sixty failed banks and protected the assets of depositors.
And since there can be no reform in Ukraine without security, over 266 million dollars of our support has been in the security sector, training 1,200 soldiers and 750 Ukrainian National Guard personnel and supplying lifesaving gear.
In FY 16, we are continuing that training and equipment of more of Ukraine's border guards, military and coast guard.
melody krell
Okay, so what we need to do is use our critical thinking.
So that was 2015.
Victoria Nuland is basically saying that the United States is not only funding and arming and doing all the police and justice and everything else going on in Ukraine.
At the same time, Donald Trump wins miraculously wins.
And all of a sudden, both Russia and Trump are maligned by the same people that overthrew the Ukrainian government and worked side by side with George Soros.
So we have to really start looking at the international implications of Russia Gate.
It was not just a crime against the people of the United States of America or the will of the people who voted for Donald Trump.
They were not going to allow Donald Trump to go off track from the long term game.
If you want to ask me, you go to World War I, World War II, World War III that they're ramping up right now.
It's the same people, the same money, the same objective, a unified Europe with a no longer existent Russia divided as per Brzezinski.
And we know that Obama brought back Brzezinski after he had been ousted, and also Madeleine Albright, Henry Kissinger.
This was a long term plan to destroy Russia from within, break up Russia.
It's right in Brzezinski's book, and then run the world.
basically from Brussels and Geneva.
So we do have to question how this affected our foreign policy if it was a globalist action.
Because we know at the same time that not only was the United States under Barack Obama, the intelligence agencies, FBI, CIA involved, but also MI6, and so was Australia.
It was a five eyes nation.
So the West wanted to continue down the path and did not want to give Donald Trump the chance to have detente with Vladimir Putin or work out a new way forward for the world.
So I would say that the people that are involved in RussiaGate didn't only have a grand conspiracy against the people of the United States, frankly, I think they betrayed the world.
Had we had the conversations during that time that were free and fair, we probably wouldn't be even close to where we are, let alone if there had ever been a war in Ukraine.
And just yesterday we found out the true number.
1.2 million Ukrainians have died.
There is no reason for this to go on.
And frankly, the whole situation in the West, in the West in general, is falling apart at the seams.
And no matter what they want to do, the truth is the people are seeing this for what it is.
But we, the people, have to understand Russia Gate was much bigger than the United States of America and it harmed this world.
And everyone involved should go to jail, as far as I'm concerned.
This is not just a small getting rid of Trump.
This was interfering with things that could have happened that would have bettered the world and created peace and ended up not in the precipice of World War three.
We will see you right after the break, but you know what?
We have to be honest with ourselves if we want to save America.
Hello, I am back.
It is Melkay from the Melkay Show sitting in for Owen Schroyer.
I really want to talk about the EU.
We are at a place right now with the EU where we have to really look at the history, where we are and where we are going.
What is going on there right now is that they are asking the United States and the world to give NATO protections without NATO Article 5 protections to Ukraine, at the same time that they are saying that they are going to hold off on solidifying the deal that they just made yesterday because they are having problems with our Digital Services Act objection.
And we are not just going to fold and allow them to do that.
At the same time, we found out that Victor Orban and Slovakia have issued a letter to NATO, basically saying that they believe that Ukraine continues to target vital infrastructure inside Hungary, carrying out the largest humanitarian program in its history to support the war stricken population while also providing Ukraine.
Ukraine with a significant share of its gas and fuel supplies while Ukraine is attacking them, as well as 40 percent of the imported electricity they They are asking the Commission to fully uphold its commitments and guarantee the security of all members and to have Ukraine stop attacking them.
At the same time, we have Vanderleyen out there talking about how history, she says this in an interview, that there is no oligarchy in Europe.
She says history is back and so are geopolitics.
And we see that what we have perceived as a world order is becoming a world disorder triggered not least by the power struggle between China and the United States, but of course also Putin'ss imperialistic ambitions.
Hello, that is not what's going on.
Frankly, the people that want the war are the European Union.
They continue to push for war because, as we know, war is how they consolidate power and profit after the war, reconstruction.
We've been fooled twice in the past, shall we be fooled again?
I'd like to play a clip of van der Leyen telling us that we need to have Article V like protections for Ukraine going forward as well as protect them through 2030.
Let's take a look at her, van der Leyen.
ursula von der leyen
Ukraine must be able to uphold its sovereignty and its territorial integrity.
There can be no limitations on Ukrainian armed forces, be it cooperation with or other third countries or assistance from other third countries.
No limitations for the Ukrainian armed forces.
As I've often said, Ukraine must become a steel porcupine, undigestible for potential invaders.
We welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine.
And the coalition of the willing, including the European Union, is ready to do its share.
melody krell
Well, the European Union has basically captured all 27 nations within the European Union with their net zero and commitment to Agenda 2030 and the International Banking Cartel plans for the world.
They are not prioritizing humans at all, let alone the 1.2 million people who have died in Ukraine.
Ukraine will have to be rebuilt.
We know that BlackRock and Chase and others have already said that they would put 800 billion dollars into the reconstruction of Ukraine.
In the meantime, there's a very disturbing article that has come out about Ukraine from Turkish media that is reporting that.
Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelenskyy's inner circle already transferred fifty million dollars each month to two companies based in the United Arab Emirates, reportedly obtained through corrupt practices.
The funds are said to be flowing to GFM Investment Group and GFM Holdings, linked to former Ukrainian state property fund advisor Andrei Gemrin, who is currently wanted internationally for alleged corruption and was arrested in France last year over money laundering and stolen assets.
Ukrainian lawmakers are also denying that there is money disappearing.
Yet what we do know is that Vladimir Putin has said many times that he would like to have this come to an end.
And he has put out what he would like, which is not change, no NATO, nothing of that.
But apparently, Zelenskyy continues to say that he will not go with that.
But again, we have to ask ourselves, who is really running Ukraine?
If you look at that clip earlier from Victoria Nuland and the one from the nineties of George Soros, it doesn't appear that Vladimir Zelenskyy even has that ability, first and foremost.
Second, he has not been president since last March.
So Lavrov is coming out and saying, we don't know who we should be negotiating with.
And at this point, I don't know who Donald Trump should be negotiating with.
But hopefully we will see some changes going forward.
As far as the EU, they are not backing down, particularly when it comes to wanting to control the narrative on the information war that we are in.
And frankly, it looks like they are going to hold hostage the tariff agreement that they made yesterday until we allow them to continue forward with the Digital Services Act.
So at this point, who is really running Ukraine should be the first question.
Second, if you look at what Victoria Nuland and Soros were saying, they were putting hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars into Ukraine since the 90s.
So who is Ukraine for?
What are they really building there?
The people of Ukraine don't seem to matter.
And in the meantime, we have a whole lot of other things going on in the EU, particularly when it comes to digital ID and track and trace surveillance.
And right now, we know that Bill Gates is out there talking about digital ID as the answer to, I guess, poverty.
He is out there right now, put out a report through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that digital IDs are effective tool against poverty.
A global solution is making them available now.
But what we see coming out of this is the modular open source identity platform that he is proposing.
And of course, he funded, along with the global public infrastructure, with a lot of partners from the World Economic Forum, global public-private partnership, as well as the OMEDAR network.
And anyway, this MOSIP, it is a fundamental global public infrastructure that includes a digital ID that will be given out to the third world to bring them into our world.
He also insists that it will fight against terrorism, secure the border environment, protect the environment, combat money laundering, help the unemployed, prevent pandemics, add help with artificial intelligence and protect private property, a digital ID that he is creating, that he already created, the global public infrastructure and ID twenty twenty.
So I guess he thinks that we have no idea what's going on.
In the meantime, we are also a little disturbed here because I am not happy about anything having to do with track and trace surveillance in America.
Frankly, the Patriot Act was unconstitutional beyond comprehension.
And the only person who stood up was Ron Paul and said, How can we do this?
It's so unconstitutional.
But we were right after 911, the country was in chaos and they pushed it through.
Though the Patriot Act was written before 911 and of course I believe it was attached to the project for the new American century, which was this militarizing the world through America by Rumsfeld and Cheney and all of the suspects that have been involved in the endless war known as the War on Terror.
So in the meantime, we've already been tracked, traced and surveilled beyond comprehension.
The United States of America does still have a constitution and bill of rights and privacy and liberty should be part of that and the American people should be pushing through back because I'm not getting a clear divide as to where everything that is being created by Elon Musk, Palantir, Ellison, all these people, where the constitution lives in cyberspace.
Even if we get back our borders in terms of sovereign nation, national borders on the ground, the real threat is the cyberspace.
And I don't want the United States of America attached to Bill Gates' global public infrastructure that is going to be run by the United Nations and the World Economic Forum and their partners.
And as of right now, I don't get any sense that cyberspace will be protected for the United States of America and for our citizens separate from the global public infrastructure, which is interoperable and they're selling at work warp speed.
In the meantime, the Genius Act is talking about having protocols for identification while at the same time Louisiana is saying that they want full age verification online for anyone who is going to some of the sites like Roblox at the same time we're being told that real ID is needed to travel.
All this seems antithetical to the Constitution of the United States.
But Noah Harari had something to say about surveillance that I think the American people should listen to.
This is not about left and right, Republican and Democrat.
This is about liberty and why America is America.
We cannot have a global public infrastructure that the United States is on with a global digital ID that is interoperable of the whole world.
But that is what Agenda 2030 is, and it was always that birth to death, full track and trace surveillance of all humanity, not just that of human resources, animals, water, air, cyberspace, and this is very, very dangerous.
And we, the people of the United States, are not stepping up and asking about the Constitution as surveillance comes up all over our inside, outside our homes, all over the Internet.
And of course, we are battling the EU with their Digital Services Act.
So let's listen to Harari about surveillanceillance, the profit of the World Economic Forum.
yuval noah harari
Social credit system is basically an expansion of money or a new kind of money.
When you think about traditional money, gold coins, dollars, even bitcoins, they give value only to specific parts of human reality.
Some things you do, like you work, you gain money, you want to buy a airline ticket, you pay money, but other things you go visit your friends, you go visit your grandmother, even you throw trash in the street.
This is, this has no monetary value.
The idea of the social credit is to monetize everything, to give value to every single thing you do in life.
And this is your score.
So even things that traditionally were not about money, they're about reputation or status.
Suddenly you get precise points for them.
And also anything you want to do, you need to use your social credit for it.
So again, it has positive potential in some regards.
It could create the most totalitarian, again, systems in history where anything you do impacts your ability to get a job, to gain a loan, to travel.
And in a way, you see this not only in China, you see it all over the world, also in the US.
This because it's a function of surveillance that traditionally only some areas of life were monitored and surveyed.
And even in dictatorships, there was privacy.
If you live in the Soviet Union, so the KGB can't follow you all the time.
They just don't have enough agents.
unidentified
Right.
yuval noah harari
They try, but they can't.
They try, but you know, you have 200 million Soviet citizens.
They don't have 200 million agents.
Now, you can monitor everybody all the time.
You don't need human agents or analysts.
You have the computers, smartphones, cameras, drones, microphones, everywhere, and you have the AIs analyzing all the ocean of information.
So this creates the potential for total surveillance.
And it can take the form of a social credit system.
melody krell
And that is exactly what we should be worried about in America right now, you can come back to me.
In the meantime, I just want to say this is very dangerous.
And I do not believe that this is, should be in America.
It is antithetical to everything this country stands for.
We are already aware that three million people after January 6 were surveilled as domestic terrorists.
We had Chris Ray and Merrick Garland go ahead and put in an anti-authority, anti-government task force that, uh, kicked open the doors of 1600 Americans, let alone went into raiding, uh, you know, Navarro and Roger Stone and Bannon.
And look at what they've done to Alex Jones.
I mean, we have to be serious about what we will tolerate in the United States as American citizens, because this is where they are heading and they are not slowing down.
In the meantime, what we did learn also is that there is a lot of work going on at DARPA and at NATO as well.
And recently, as you know, RFK junior mentioned wearables.
But for wearable devices like Apple Watches, Fitbit to advanced neurotech in gaming and medicine and defense, a great woman, Brandy Smith, told Lara Logan last week, explains how these innovations are transforming lives and potentially could compromise.
The conversation raises urgent concerns about privacy, neurological warfare, ethics of mind reading technology, because right now we are way past the point of minority report.
It turns out that it's really highly advanced at this point.
They've been doing extensive studies on this for years, as I always say, on my themelkeshow dot com resource page.
I have the NATO document on cognitive warfare and turning brains into weapons on the individual scale in groups, in nations and in the world.
So if they have all this technology, which I believe they have had since World War II, and it continues to advance, and then we bring in Palinese technology.
And Palantir and Ellison's building the Skynet.
And we have all these interoperable things going on.
Then we have surveillance under the skin.
And again, AI, the threat of AI.
It is the only United States of America at this point that can actually push back.
But a lot of Americans because of convenience, are not even looking at it.
They're giving their eyes scans, their retina scans.
I keep saying, Didn't you see a minority report?
He had to cut out his eyes because of his retina scans.
Meanwhile, we also are accepting these bracelets and wearables and things that are taking our temperature, our health.
Our heart rate, all of that, and not even asking where the data is going.
We should at least be demanding that we control our data.
And if they want to have our data, we should be compensated.
But I don't really feel anyone pushing back in America.
And it is being sold as convenience, which we all understand.
But at the same time, we are not dealing with people that care about, you know, freedom or liberty or anything of that sovereignty.
They don't want nation states.
The people behind this are the same people that are the global partners of the public-private partnership and the international bankers.
So why would we think that full surveillance under our skin, as Harari warned, isn't coming?
are also still talking about the useless people after AI and after they get into their fourth industrial revolution and all of the land is taken over by data centers.
Let's listen to Harari about what they're going to do about us useless people when they get it all up and running.
yuval noah harari
And when you look back in history, people constantly compare the threat of automation and job loss in the 21st century to what happened in the 20th century.
In the 20th century, you saw automation in agriculture, so lots of unemployed farm workers moved to working in industry.
And then when automation reached the industries, they moved to working as cashiers at Walmart.
But in those cases, what happened was that people lost low-skilled jobs and transferred to other low-skilled jobs.
Moving from being an agricultural worker to working in some When you lost your job at the Detroit car factory and got a new job as a cashier at Walmart, again, you moved from a low-skilled job to a low-skilled job.
But the next stage, if the next stage means I'm losing my job at 45 as a cashier at Walmart, and now there is an opening as a software engineer at Google designing virtual worlds, this is going to be much more difficult than moving from the car factory to Walmart.
And it's very likely that even if there are new jobs, most of the unemployed masses will not be able to make the transition.
It's also a big question about young people that nobody really knows what a job market would be like in 20 or 30 years.
It's really the first time in history that nobody has any idea what kind of jobs and what kind of skills people will need in 30 years, which means that we have absolutely no idea what to teach children at school.
Most of what they learn is going to be irrelevant to the requirements of the job market and of society in 2050.
What to teach them instead, we just don't know.
And the worst problem, of course, is not in the developed countries, but in the developed countries., if you think about a country like, I don't know, Sweden, which now gets a lot of attention in the US.
So I'm not so worried about the Swedes.
I mean, even if millions of jobs are lost in Sweden, I think that because of the tradition of the welfare state and so forth, the Swedish government will raise taxes on the big companies and universal basic income or something like that, the Swedes will be okay, I think.
The really big question is what will happen to the Nigerians, to the Bangladeshi, to the Brazilians.
If millions of textile workers in Bangladeshh lose their jobs because of automation, what will they do?
I mean, we are not teaching the children of Bangladesh today to be software engineers.
What will they do in twenty or thirty years?
melody krell
Okay, let's be honest, this is not the future anyone really wants, first of all.
Second of all, I'd like to go back to being an agricultural society and having farms thriving all over America instead of abandoned farmland.
They want to build all their data centers, which will take so much energy and a ton of water and a ton of natural resources while we have all this land.
that we should be growing.
We have all this apparently manufacturing coming back.
We should be rebuilding Main Street.
We should be doing things that humans do.
But when you're an atheist and you don't believe in God and you really believe that automation is the answer and technology is the future and you don't really need to teach children literature or how to read or how to research or how to do anything because it's all going to be AI.
I mean, the dystopian future he's talking about would be less disturbing if I didn't see what was going on at the World Economic Forum.
I don't think it was an accident that Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump met in Alaska the same day that the ISIL met.
This happened the same day that the World Economic Forum announced that they were having two people rise to the top, which included Larry Fink of BlackRock and Andre Hoffman.
So they are now the co chairs of the World Economic Forum.
This happened the same day Russia is meeting with the US and Trump, and they're talking about a new way forward, new cooperation.
Larry Fink takes over.
Of course, he is right now in Jackson Hole for the parent company that runs the United States of America annual conference.
And what I need to say about that is probably that the American people really need to get used used to understanding how this affects us globally, because not only is Larry Fink the CEO of the $11 trillion BlackRock that basically owns everything in America, but also at the same time he is now the top of the World Economic Forum,
which is pushing not just Agenda 2030, full track and trace surveillance, the fourth industrial revolution, but it's also where Noah Harari is the top advisor to the top of the technical and human sociological department over there at the World Economic Forum.
Do not forget COVID-19, The Great Reset, that was Klaus Schwab's book, then of course, The Great Narrative.
They are all in cahoots.
They are aligned with the United Nations, the EU, the international bankers.
And now Larry Fink has got the top spot.
He was pushing the great reset.
He was pushing the ESG scores.
And this week he is telling all the bankers and the billionaires that run the global public-private partnership that runs the world exactly what they're going to do going forward.
He put out a little note here saying the world is more fragmented and complex than ever, but the need for the platform, meaning the World Economic Forum that brings together business, government and civil society, that is NGOs to you and me, has never been greater.
We believe the forum can serve as a unique catalyst for cooperation.
One that fosters trust, identifies shared goals and turns dialogue into action.
Again, he goes on talking about the stakeholders and what will happen with the stakeholders.
And I actually have a first clip here of Larry Fink telling exactly how he does what he does.
He calls it forcing behavior.
As I told you, before the pandemic hit our shores, it was not only Larry Fink that had his Jackson Hole meeting and talked about going direct, basically skipping governments as always planned and going with corporations and banks directly to the people.
And I believe that's what he's talking about in this clip.
So please take a look at the new head of the World Economic Forum, the head of BlackRock, the head of many, many projects around the world, Larry Fink.
Let's take a look at Larry Fink talking about behavior.
Estimate criteria for you.
larry fink
Well, behaviors are going to have to change, and this is one thing we're going to be asking companies.
You have to force behaviors, and at BlackRock, we are forcing behaviors.
Fifty four percent of the incoming class are women.
We added four more points in terms of diverse employment this year.
So what we are doing internally is if you don't achieve these levels of impact, your compensation could be impacted.
james comey
We are doing the same thing.
larry fink
And so it's just, you have to force behaviors.
And if you don't force behaviors, whether it's gender or race or just any way you want to say the composition of your team, you're going to be impacted.
And that's just not required.
melody krell
Okay, well, Larry Fink is going to be forcing change.
He's right now in Jackson Hole telling everyone what they're going to do with the new, a rebranded ESG score, social credit score and all.
We will see you after the break.
Okay, and we are back.
So let's talk a little bit about what is going on at the parent company of the United States meeting in Jackson Hole today.
First and foremost, I believe that we are going to see a rebranding of something we have all been talking about, the ridiculous ESG score that Larry Fink is talking about in the clip before the break, forcing behavior.
Of course, it is known as now, inclusive capitalism, which is a centralized program that links together governance, bureaucracies, NGOs, billionaire backed foundations and international banks and corporations to have one umbrella, basically globalism, multiculturalism, DEI, climate change, all of it is under that umbrella.
They call it Agenda 2030.
And basically last year, one of the leaders in that, Linda Rothschild, came out and basically said, it's not working anymore.
Too many people know about the ESG score and DEI and they're rejecting it.
So the Council for Inclusive Capitalism, which is essentially communism, came out and said that they need to rebrand ESG score.
So if you're wondering what's going on at that meeting, I suggest that that's probably what's happening.
They call it stakeholder capitalism, but what it means is that there is a ruling class or as the Council of Foreign Relations and Chantham House would call it, the superclass.
And that, of course, they are the ones that are running the world and we all just have to go along with their plans.
Of course, this is the Club of Rome, which is a Rockefeller Institute, as is the UN, as is the Council of Foreign Relations and the World Economic Forum.
They are all in line with the international banks.
And not only that, we have the other head, new head of the World Economic Forum, again talking about pushing Agenda 2030 into our lives.
And don't forget, had Kamala Harris been placed in office, we would be going straight ahead because the Biden Harris administration or whoever Biden was running the Autopenn committed to making sure that the United States achieved Barack Obama's 2015 commitment to have the United States not only achieve Agenda 2030, but reach it.
And I firmly believe that the United States of America has been paid for the entire globalist experiment all of these years, particularly since Barack Obama signed that.
But let's take a look at the other head of the World Economic Forum right now, who is also in Jackson Hole, Andre Hoffman talk about Agenda 2030.
unidentified
Go ahead.
andre hoffmann
I started this platform with my wife some years ago on the principle that we needed to and we have wrote down the mission on a little panel there that we need to accelerate the movement towards a sustainable economy by fostering the agenda 2030 of the United Nations and collaborating this on the SDG Goal 17 goals.
And we do this by building bridges within different projects, and I think today is a good example of that, but also by connecting people who don't necessarily know each other, who are not necessarily aware that they are working in the same direction.
So as Anna Maya said kindly in her introduction, I happen to be one of these rare animals who happens to sit in corporate boards and corporate decision, but also quite actively involved in NGOs.
And I'm completely convinced that business is a force for good.
And I'm going to explain that because sometimes that particular thing needs to be explained.
But first, intent.
Intent, we try to create these events which today have to be on the screen, but which normally were in real life.
And we hope to be able to resume that very soon.
The principle of what we are trying to achieve is to demonstrate that the current system and the pandemic has shown that very clearly, the current system is not really fit for purpose as a humanity., we are not respecting the different forces that constitute our system in a reasonable way.
In particular, we overconsume natural resources.
We abuse social and human systems, and all this in the name of short term profit maximization.
melody krell
Oh yeah.
So anyway, he's talking about how NGOs and multinational corporations and banks will be controlling the future as per Agenda 2030.
I just want to remind everyone, it is a full track and trace surveillance from birth to death.
That is why they want everyone to have a phone, everyone to have internet.
All this is about making sure that we do not use their natural resources.
because the way they see it is they're the parent company of planet Earth.
Hello there.
I'm Mel Kay from the Mel Kay Show in for Owen Troyer.
I want to talk a little bit more in depth about BlackRock.
It does seem that BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street really run this country from above and frankly, the elevation of Larry Fink at the World Economic Forum is not a surprise, but it is concerning because the United States of America was never meant to be a corporate democracy or whatever it is right now and certainly the power that this person has should be more understood and yet very few people do understand BlackRock at all.
So I just want you to know it was established by Larry Fink in 1988.
The company positioned itself to have almost total absolute control over key institutions such as the Federal Reserve, Wall Street megabanks, Goldman Sachs, Davos World Economic Forum, obviously behind the Great Reset.
It is also said that Larry Fink met with Joe Biden only a couple of days before all the other candidates that were running in the primary for Democrat in 2020 dropped out and Joe Biden became the choice.
Of course, then multiple people from BlackRock were were in his cabinet, including Dease, who was the sustainable development chief over at BlackRock, and many other people, Mike Tom Donalan, he was an institute of investment for BlackRock.
He went in to run the China Foreign Relations during the AutoPenn presidency, but at the same time the company amassed huge financial assets, but also software.
One notable tool is BlackRock's Aladdin, a risk management system software that can monitor and analyze trading activities across more than 18 trillion worth of assets of two hundred financial institutions, including all of the central banks, including our Federal Reserve and Europe, basically, then the rest of all the companies use that to go forward.
And of course, they have been fully behind the entire Agenda 2030 from the beginning to the end.
The real problem I think that we have here is that BlackRock doesn't seem to have any oversight.
As I said, Biden appointed Brian Dease, the director of National Economic Council, for the last four years.
Of course, he was the head of BlackRock's Global Sustainable Investing.
We had Wally Adamo, who was number two to Janet Yellen.
I'm thinking of Janet Yellen, also a BlackRock guy.
We had multiple BlackRock people in the back of the Obama administration as well.
And as you know, BlackRock and Vanguard seem to be one and the same.
They are labeled systematically important financial institutions under the post 2008 Dodd Frank Act.
They vigorously lobbied to successfully ward off any proposition that they were in that group.
And BlackRock now operates as his own entity, free from any regulations basically at all.
They are now systematically indispensable to the degree only matched by Vanguard, who is reported asly the significant shareholder of BlackRock.
So we do have to understand that a lot of the people that are on the world stage right now, including Mertz, also what's his Cheryl Mills is on the board of BlackRock.
We have George Osborne on the board of BlackRock, the former British Chancellor.
This is how they do that.
And Philip Hildebrandt of Swiss National Bank is on the board.
BlackRock Investment also the Bank of Canada, former head.
Also the emergency bailout plan from the Federal Reserve chairman Sherome Powell back in March 2019.
Oh, yeah, that's right.
BlackRock did that too.
At a time when financial markets seemed on the verge of experiencing a 2008 Lehman crisis, also known as the consolidation of banking on its way to central bank digital currency, Powell appointed BlackRock without seeking any bids to oversee all the Fed's corporate purchase programs, even those involving bonds in which BlackRock itself had invested.
Also, a coalition of thirty NGOs voiced concerns to Chairman Powell, saying that by entrusting BlackRock with the full management of its debt buyout program, the Fed not only enhances BlackRock's systematic importance to the financial system, but it also does so without subjecting BlackRock to regulatory scrutiny that even smaller systematically important financial institutions face.
In 2019, the campaign for accountability came out and said that BlackRock, the world's premier asset manager, pursued a strategy of lobbying, campaign contributions and strategic hiring of insiders to stave off government regulations, thereby cementing its position as the globe's most influential financial corporation.
Of course, at the same time, many people that are watching this have their pensions invested.
in BlackRock through BlackRock in the whole world as well.
They have a lot of deals in Mexico and China.
So what are we dealing with here in America?
A global public-private partnership that runs our country from above that seems to think that going directly using corporations and banks to force behavior is the way forward.
The New York Fed engaged BlackRock to oversee its commercial mortgage backed securities program and its 750 billion dollar primary and secondary corporate bond and ETF purchase with no bid contracts.
Again.
Also, for the first time in history, the Fed, it says here, This came out of Wall Street on Parade blog by Pam and Russ Martins.
For the first time in history, the Fed has enlisted BlackRock to go direct and acquire 750 billion in both primary and secondary corporate bonds and bond ETFs, a market in which BlackRock is one of the world's leading suppliers.
Adding to that, the BlackRock managed program will be allocated 75 billion dollars of the 454 billion in taxpayer money to absorb the losses on its corporate bond purchases, which will include its own ETFs, which the Fed is permitting it to buy.
This is very strange what is going is going on here.
And yet most people in America don't even know who Larry Fink, the World Economic Forum, or BlackRock is.
Not to mention BlackRock's relationship with Mexico and the idea that Fink appointed 52-year-old Marcos Antonio Slim Domit, the billionaire son of Mexico's richest man, and Carlos Slim, to BlackRock's board alongside all the other people.
Slim's son was also co chair of the World Economic Forum's Latin America movement and a young global leader.
All this happening at the same time that we are watching all different scandals unfold with the cartels and in Mexico.
In the meantime, I'd like to play a clip recently that Bill Gates and Larry Fink together did an interview talking about the future and what they're doing.
And if you ask me, I don't think this has anything to do with nation states because Agenda 2030 is an end of nation state plan, you know, an open society, no borders.
That's why they wanted to destroy our culture from within.
Let's take a look at Bill Gates and Larry Fink together talking about our future that we have no choice in because they'll decide it for us.
unidentified
And for both of you, you've been partners in this effort to recruit other CEOs.
I'd like you to tell me a little bit about the feedback you've gotten, the level of enthusiasm or not, what are people saying, and what can we expect from the two of you in the months ahead?
Are you optimistic that you'll be able to bring other leaders, other companies into this project?
bill gates
Yeah.
larry fink
Well, I would let me start off because Bill has been working behind the scenes for a long time on this, and I've been playing maybe the color coordinator or the backup.
Bill has been very instrumental in all these conversations and I've been able to fill in where the relationships I had I've had I've had a few of the partners I've had from some very serious conversations I believe these companies but importantly the companies that have not signed up but I believe will sign up understand what we're trying to do They believe in the science foundation of what Catalyst is.
This is not just a venture fund.
This is really about using philanthropic money or using capital that would be below market rate capital to try to accelerate a private sector solution alongside the government.
And so it's a pretty easy story.
The commitments every firm is making in many cases is a large commitment and there may be more of that.
But I do believe in my conversations, it actually accelerates the conversation within these companies.
And in most cases, they're all saying we want to be a part of it.
bill gates
Yeah, I'd say the private sector engagement in climate versus say 2015 at the time of the Paris talks, it's improved dramatically.
And so if you step back, you know, no, we don't have the total solution to this incredible problem, but the momentum, both on the rate of innovation and large parts of the private sector saying they have to be part of the solution.
These seven are in the vanguard, you know, we hope to get over twenty companies to be key partners in this effort, and I don't think that will be super hard.
Larry has been a huge help.
melody krell
Yes, he has.
Yes, he has.
Let's not forget at this meeting this week, of course, they will be talking about ESG scores to remind everyone.
Fink is not only now the top of the World Economic Forum, but which is behind the Great Reset and Agenda 2030, but he was the leader in ESG corporate investing.
Fink basically pushed it on everyone, and that is the United Nations Sustainable Economy Initiative that is coming to fruition, and that is what they're talking about, where global banks and global international organizations basically replace the people of our nation in deciding things.
It's called the Global Public Private Partnership, and in public, that's not you.
It's not me.
It's not anyone watching this show.
The public are the people they fund to get into office to control us, to push us to what they want, their sustainable economy.
Again, they are not on the same level as us, so it doesn't really matter.
But basically, companies garner favorable ratings in what they're talking about if they have gender diversity and they reduce their carbon footprint and they have sustainable energy sources all around the United Nations World Economic Forum ideology.
Corporations continue to push global sustainable governance, ESG scores, they're renaming them, corporate donations to things like Black Lives Matter and other things including all the UN agencies, the World Health Organization, the Club of Rome, all talking the same exactly language.
At the same time, the idea of the Constitution, the Bill of Rights and sovereign nation states is completely left out of the conversation.
And it will be, I'm sure, this week, and it will be again in Davos.
I do not understand, and again I say, I believe that every American citizen should be asking that the International Organization Immunity Act of 1947 be rescinded and that we stop playing this game with these international organizations or the idea that we never fought a war to be a sovereign nation called the United States of America that is not held to international organizations and get the international banks, along with the Fed, out of our country, pull out a NATO.
This is all insane.
They have looted and lied to the United States populist for decades, particularly between 1944 and 1954 when they set up this whole globalist scam.
And frankly, I believe that trillions of dollars of the US taxpayer money has been going through USAID and the World Bank and other things to fund this entire globalist operation and everything that they're doing around the world.
Why are we 36 trillion dollars in debt?
Well, I believe that the US taxpayers have been paying not just for endless wars, but for everything that they're talking about at the United Nations., certainly the World Health Organization, NATO, UNESCO, they can't survive without us.
And yet we keep playing along with this nonsense.
We have a constitution, a bill of rights, and a country that is supposed to be by the people for the people, not for Bill Gates and Larry Fink and the old mentality of David Rockefeller where bankers and billionaires are surely the preferable people to run the country than autodetermination of the populace.
No, that's not true.
And we have to stop playing along with it.
In the meantime, BlackRock is investing in our grid.
So they've spent 12.5 billion dollars to acquire global.
They are global infrastructure partners with 100 billion in infrastructure assets.
Their next target is going to be worth, this target is going to be worth 100 billion dollars, nearly 10 times bigger than their first acquisition.
And these are all about taking over the grid and utilities countrywide.
So basically when you own these wires and substations and supply power, you control energy.
And then all these data centers that they're building and carbon captures.
So basically what we are dealing with is that California's average price right now is something.
But in a little while, they're going to decide it.
It's not going to be the state deciding it because these are all looking like they're going to go private.
And in the meantime, private equity, both BlackRock and Blackstone have entered not just the US electricity market, but we know also the housing market.
And we are at a point where they have acquired Minnesota Utility Company for six billion dollars serving one hundred thousand people.
And Blackstone is buying a New Mexico company serving eight hundred thousand people for eleven billion dollars, both utility markets.
So it may not matter every day to everyone what they are doing, but it certainly should matter to those of us that still have believe in privacy, liberty, the constitution, the Bill of Rights, the sovereign nation of the United States.
I mean, every single thing that is happening here is moving towards what has always been the goal, which is a global one world government, as told to us by, of course, George HW Bush, which I would like to remind everyone that this has never stopped.
It has only grown.
And then there is, of course, the Rockefeller Institute, the Carnegie Institute, the Ford Foundation, and all the other NGOs, Open Society, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the Clinton Foundation, all of these run by a model I call the Rockefeller model.
So they create tons of NGOs, which they call civil society that align with the idea the international banks because they're the ones financing it, and the foundations, they're the ones financing that too.
None of them pay taxes, and then they co-opt our entire country with all kinds of no big contracts everywhere.
And before you know it, we're in the fourth industrial revolution, a totalitarian, technocratic, full track and trace surveillance world that I don't believe any American citizen that is a true lover of this country, the liberty that we, we are granted the inalienable rights, wants.
But if we sit back and wait, that's going to happen, and we have to, no matter what, even if you love Donald Trump or hate Donald Trump, it has nothing to do with him what are you willing to stand for and where does it stop?
Because you have to do it in your backyard.
Everything that they're talking about is in your backyard.
People say, Oh, you know, DC or Wall Street or whatever.
Every one of these things, this full surveillance, the violations of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the over police, everything that's going on at our borders, everywhere, this is in your backyards.
You can investigate where the UN or the World Economic Forum or any of these NGOs are in your community.
Who is getting your taxpayer money?
Where is the data they're collecting on your smart meters or from your children at school?
This is all going to some kind of global public infrastructure.
And if we don't start asking the right questions and demanding answers and knowing where the Constitution stands with their fourth industrial revolution, then we won't be able to stand anywhere anymore that they don't allow us to.
Speaking of that, I want to move on briefly.
I don't know if everyone caught this story yet, but it is it is it is it is heating up.
And I believe that there will be indictments in COVID.
And I know that a lot of people are waiting for that.
But what has come out now from senior American intelligence officials is truly disturbing beyond comprehension.
Not that we didn't know, but let's just say.
that now we have true evidence that not only did the intelligence community and it looks like the CIA cover up the COVID-19 leak from the lab, but that Anthony Fauci and his inner circle knew exactly what happened from day one.
Evidence is pointing to a lab leak included in signals intelligence collected from the Chinese Communist Party leaders in 2019 between Beijing and Wuhan, revealing a major emergency very early, two months before they told Donald Trump.
So it looks like the political deep state concealed information from Donald Trump., though they knew from signals intelligence from the CCP that there was a major medical emergency and a leak from that lab.
During the first two months of the pandemic, no one told him, including Anthony Fauci, deflecting blame from China as political rival Joe Biden sought to lay the responsibility for the entire pandemic on Trump's shoulders, which is why I continue to say we need to look into the Transition Integrity Project, again with a fine toothed comb.
That would be Rosa Brooks and Michael Steele and John Podesta that gamed out how Trump might win the election in 2020 and work backwards.
because this doesn't look like not only is it a pandemic, but it looks like for two months they knew that it was and did nothing about it to help Joe Biden or whoever the Democratic candidate was at that time.
It seems a little early to know that it was Joe Biden, but at this point you have to question everything.
Anyway, it says hierups continued to dismiss evidence for the lab leak, saying that it was a conspiracy theory when they knew full well that it wasn't.
Frankly, they deceived millions of Americans about the disease that u ended their lives and befell their loved ones.
The spies that are scientists at 4 four intelligence agencies and four other government officials spoke to the Daily Caller News Foundation on condition of anonymity to reveal previously unreported details about censored intelligence under two presidential administrations.
They also decoded engineering in the COVID-19 genome, clues Chinese authorities were powerless to hide, two spy scientists said.
But the evidence was conspicuously omitted from public reports released by the intelligence community under then president, also Joe Biden, as senior officials instead elevated the analysis of Anthony Fauci and his inner circle who argued the virus was assuredly natural.
The omission prompted a formal complaint from one.
A spy said Tulsi Gabbard told The Daily Caller she would hold intelligence community accountable by working with whistleblowers, reviewing classified materials and investigating where taxpayer funds may have helped create the COVID-19 virus.
She went on to say it's clear that dissenting views were likely silenced to support Joe Biden's administration's preferred narrative and to hurt Donald Trump.
Under President Trump's maximum transparency agenda, we're committed to exposing the truth so we can build back trust in the intelligence community.
It appears that the CIA was also very involved in this and we have to take note because we have to start looking at exactly who and what the CIA is, who and what it works for, and why they were so involved in not only the Russia hoax, but also the COVID hoax, and the COVID pandemic, as we call it here.
It is also clear that CIA director John Radcliffe, a long time critic of politicization of intelligence, knew about the origins of COVID that he witnessed in DNI as DNI in Trump's first term, and that he will hold people accountable as well.
He has declassified information and will continue to update assessment with intelligence about science and everything.
And everything that was hidden about the pandemic, not only has Director Radcliffe delivered the vital truth about COVID origins to the American people, but will root out the politicization of intelligence and hold the people behind the pandemic accountable.
Well, let's hope so because so many people out there have suffered, many people are still asking questions and beyond that, we also have found out that many people out there have been trying to get the insurance information and also the hospital records of loved ones that died in hospitals during COVID.
This has become increasingly difficult and I know that RFK and others are working., including looking into what was going on with the VARS schedule and everything else.
But we are at a place where the American people have had it and we want some answers and more and more is coming out.
But it does look like the pandemic was in fact an operation again on a global scale.
And the CIA was actually not little involved, but it looks like very involved.
And we need to find out where that began and ended.
And it looks like we will be finding that out soon, according to Tulsi Gabbard spokespeople.
At the same time, we are having a lot of questions about science in general.
There are now suggestions that we redeffined death.
So I guess the whole science and military industrial complex that can create bio weapons and has been poisoning this country is having a reckoning, but all of us need to stay on top of it and make sure that we don't back down and continue to push for transparency.
I'll see you on the other side.
unidentified
Well, I'm a tin foil hat wearing.
He's a son of a gun.
Love and sun love and hot flooding.
Texas and two steps in.
I'm not free when looking for a little fun.
alex jones
The official Alice Jones tin foil hat kit, 100% lifetime guarantee, high quality aluminum.
Got the famous shot of me there with the aluminum hat.
50 square feet, 100% lifetime guarantee.
Protect your mind from the globalist.
I love the idea they had of an Alex Jones stress ball.
People really love it.
That's available.
You know, fun little things.
Not just the widest selection of Patriot t-shirts and ball caps and hoodies and sweaters, but cool stuff like this.
Now we have the official Alex Jones tinfoil hat kit.
unidentified
So get your Alex Jones tinfoil hat kit.
alex jones
kit now at theallstore dot com dot You just saw an ad for Methylene Blue.
Tell people the short term effect and then now the long term effect.
stewart rhodes
Yeah, it gives you a good energy boost.
I use it before I work out.
So if I'm going to be doing kettlebell workouts, I do some Methylene Blue about half an hour before.
It gives you mental focus.
I don't crash afterwards.
That's good stuff.
I need some more.
alex jones
How fast did it kick in?
stewart rhodes
About 15, 20 minutes.
I think about a half hour before I work out.
alex jones
And then you're saying you're almost out of the bottle.
Was that three weeks ago?
A month ago?
I'm about to.
stewart rhodes
Yeah, something like that.
Give me the liquid and the pills too.
alex jones
You're almost out of both.
stewart rhodes
Yeah, almost out of both.
alex jones
Oh my goodness.
Well, you, all right.
I'll give you more.
For the audience, we can't give it to everybody.
We need your support at the ultrasound.com.
For me personally, the first week I got it on it, I actually started to hurt myself because the workouts were so crazy.
My trainer goes, dude, what's going on like three days into it?
I don't know.
stewart rhodes
I like it better than doing like a five-hour angie shot because it'll just make a crash afterwards.
This doesn't have the crash.
alex jones
See that?
No crash.
If you'll just try it, you'll be hooked and we can find the operation.
It's a win-win.
Now's the time.
unidentified
get the methylene blue bare minimum at theoxelstore.com Okay guys, I'm back.
melody krell
It's Mel Kay with from the Mel Kay Show in for Owen Schroyer.
If you weren't mad already by what I just told you, I got something else that is really disturbing.
What we are finding out now about it's just the level.
It was just a crime scene in DC over the last four years.
It's hard to believe every time you turn around, we were lied to about something else.
Now there are D class emails from the Environmental Protection Agency showing that the agency sought to discredit any independent scientists who questioned official data on the contamination following the East Palestine, Ohio train derailment and fire in February of 2023.
It turns out that following the official EPA announcement that there were no dangerous levels of toxins in the area and that it was safe for residents to return home, independent testing experts reported findings of high levels of dioxins in the soil in East Palestine.
Of course, according to News Nation, the findings were reported in spring of 2023.
Former EPA administrator Judith Enk said the agency should pay attention to the results instead of taking new samples and doing similar testsing, leaked emails show that the EPA began collecting Smith's personal information and monitoring his actions in an effort to discredit the environmental scientists that came up with this information.
Frankly, it goes on to say that his personal information whereabouts were distributed to more than fifty EPA employees.
His dog's picture was circulated and drones were documented hovering near the scientists on multiple occasions.
Many other people said that was happening to them as well, including Andrew Huff, who was a whistleblower on COVID.
Leslie Pitt, instead of sitting down with me and having a dialogue for the benefit of the community, they launched a smearar campaign.
They're clearly not serving the community they're supposed to protect.
And it's not just East Palestine.
It's a systematic thing.
Smith recently met with RFK Jr. to discuss what happened in that case.
That's bad.
That's really, really disturbing on a major scale, but it only gets worse from there, folks.
Whatever has been going on, and we have to hold all these people accountable.
Apparently today, six hundred people were fired by RFK Jr., which probably is not enough because now we have a declassification of a Biden HHS organ transplantation report.
Systematic disregard for sanctity of life is the least of what I would say about this.
So basically, the US Department of Health and Human Services initiated reforms of the country's organ transplantation system after a study of more major organ procurement organizations revealed disturbing practices that the HHS characterized as a systematic disregard for the sanctity of life.
The press release says hospitals allowed the organ procurement process to begin when patients showed signs of life.
And this is horrifying, said Kennedy.
The entire system must be fixed to ensure that every potential organ is transplanted.
It appears that the review that federally funded organ procurement organization and legal questions that came up, it turns out that this was a pattern of rush decision making that prioritized the need for more organs over the safety of potential donors.
Just last week, the New York Times put out an op ed that we should redefine death about this same topic.
And it, the New York Times article said that people across the nation have endured rushed or premature attempts to remove their organs as some were gasping, gasping, crying or showing other signs of life.
In these new documents, the horror stories are even worse than that and talk about an unconscious man waking up while they're trying to take out his organs.
And that's not the only one.
It turns out that this is about the situation that people are getting, it looks like, a financial benefit to have organ transplants move forward.
So it says here, twenty twenty, HHS released a new policy of guidelines that grade organ procurement organizations on the number of organs they procure from eligible donors in its donation service area.
Those that underperform will potentially be unable to renew contracts going forward.
So it looks like the, that it says here in the journal, there are compelling reasons for calling into question compliance of current practices of transplantation, especially when it is pushing for more organs in time to in order to stay involved in the program.
That can really only happen in a country that is completely captured.
It is certainly not the country that we know in the United States.
And unfortunately, under the Obama AutoPenn administration, nothing was what it seems.
It even gets worse from there.
As you know, last week the infiltrated, like all the medical and legal institutions, Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics, it turns out was recommending vaccines from their biggest supporters.
And not just that, as you know, last week the American Academy of Pediatrics said that they should not accept any religious exemptions for any of the vaccines that they recommend for children.
These are not the vaccines recommended by the CDC as it's supposed to be, but it's by the American Academy ofemy of Pediatrics is working with four of its donors, including Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi, and that they are the corporate donors and friends of the child fund at the American Academy of Pediatrics.
At the same time that RFK junior is trying to look into vaccines, he noted that make virtually every vaccine on the CDC recommended childhood vaccine schedule mandatory is what they are trying to push right now.
In the meantime, he is saying that that is not even in line with the CDC practices.
As I told you before, many people have been fired and will continue to be fired, but we do need to keep an eye on all the institutions.
We have a situation.
I think we're on a break.
Are we on a break?
No?
Okay.
Oh, we are still here.
Okay.
But we have a situation right now where there is a question also RFK junior is putting out for public comment about pharmaceutical ads on television, which of course makes the media and those reporting on the pharmaceutical companies compromise.
So in the meantime, we need to keep pushing that we want ads off TV and all disclosure about these odd relationships that should not be happening.
They also Kennedy accused them of going against the CDC for eradicating corporate influence in decisions over vaccine recommendations.
He referred the dismissal of all seventeen previous members of the CDC's top vaccine advisory panel due to finding that they were routinely advising on products from pharmaceutical firms with which they had financial ties.
And it has been a question of conflict of interest for a very long time.
The CDC vaccine schedule so far remains mostly the same since the appointment of eight new members, but they are going through it.
And this academy really should be looked at as all of them should because these groups, including the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Pediatric Association, all of these people have gone completely woke.
If you go look at their websites, it will blow your mind.
And I suggest everyone do that for themselves.
In the meantime, not to be outdone, the leftist billionaire oligarchs that fund all the left-wing oligarchs.
It's not even left wing.
It's progressive.
It's globalist.
It's the globalist oligarch billionaires that are running the controlled demolition of America, frankly.
Well, there is a new group you should know about.
They call themselves the Department of Class Solidarity.
This is an important article from the Forward Observer.
An emerging left wing activist group, of course, has launched a project to audit and track over a thousand billionaires in the United States of America.
Their static goal is not financial transparency, but political warfare to document billionaire ties to President Trump and then equipped activists with tools to, in their words, defeat them.
The group recently published its first five audits of high profile billionaires connected to Donald Trump, including Elon Musk, Palantir, Alex Carp, Department Doge, Antonio Gracias, Silicon Valley, all Silicon Valley guys also including Peter Thiel and Jeff Bezos.
They have put up wanted posters around the country, stylized as wanted for crimes.
They have put out their statement.
The Department of Class Solidarity arms.
Arms, organizers, activists and everyday people with tools to expose the billionaire ransacking of our democracy.
Welcome to the war room for the working class.
How does that sound like, communists?
There are nearly a thousand billionaires in the United States.
We're ordering every single one of them to arm the working people with the knowledge we need to defeat them.
In fact, on their WACCO website called the Department of Class Solidarity, class solidarity dot org comma, they actually put every single one of these people's names.
They put a whole thing on all of them where they live and all kinds of stuff.
This should not be allowed in America.
It's literally domestic terrorism, if you ask me.
Many of these people are the people that fund our country in general, but they are going after basically all these people, but it also includes Mark Zuckerberg.
It includes Larry Ellison, Bill Gates, Alice Walton, basically Jeffrey Hildebrandt, Trevor Reese Jones.
All of these people should be looking into who is funding this.
Apparently, when I looked into this, the Department of Class Solidarity, it turns out, is aligned with the Solidarity Center.
Get this.
Guess who funds the Solidarity Center?
This is not surprising to my audience at all, I'm sure, but that would be the AFL CIO and other unions, also the US government.
So the Solidarity Center's funding sources, the organizations receiving the majority of funding is from the US government grants, particularly the USAID, this is funding it, and the National Endowment for Democracy, surprise, surprise.
The Solidarity Center also receives grants directly from the US Department of Labor.
The Department of Labor awarded it six million dollars in November 2023 for unionized efforts in Indonesia.
The search also says that the Solidarity Center funding also went in 2024 to help significant cuts in its funding of different groups around other countries, including Chile and Brazil.
So this Solidarity Center is out there making lists and threatening people.
They also have media and a whole take action list.
Mind you, there is also a group that is planning to invade the Hamptons.
So I guess the billionaire oligarchs that are.
That are globalists that run the world that all live in the Hamptons better prepare themselves Because there is a big march on August 31 planned in the Hamptons to take down the billionaires.
And it looks like the Department of Class Solidarity will be involved in those actions as well.
So I would tell the people in the Hamptons to be prepared because they are coming to your town and they are planning even with buses and ways to get there.
In the meantime, the Forward Observer put out a color revolution, a strategic assessment between 2025 and 2028 after reviewing a lot of these documents of these different groups.
And frankly, it says that, as you know, a color revolution in their definition is a coordinated campaign to force political change, revolution, regime change by mobilizing mass protests, undermining government legitimacy, authority and capacity, and persuading citizens, elites and institutions to withdraw their support from the government, often backed by foreign funding, media and training.
The anti-Trump resistance has adopted a protest resistance revolution strategy that they have mapped out between 2026 and 2028 presidential election.
Basically, they are saying, you are here now phase one.
We are with relatively low risk with demonstration symbols.
of power, small uprisings, threat to the government, gaugeing popular support and moving on to larger demonstrations.
But they do believe that they have a full plan.
It's frankly, it's laid out.
You can go to forward observer dot com, and it says that the plan for twenty twenty five to twenty twenty six, after support and legitimacy are gained through symbolic protest, an organized resistance movement can begin engaging in selective political defiance.
These actions include civil disobedience, such as sit-ins, occupations, boycotts, sustainable disruptive demonstrations that garner media attention., build support and cause embarrassment for authorities, often leading to government overreaction, which is what they hope for to reinforce their color revolution narrative of active resistance and building legitimacy for their groups.
They lay out, they believe between 2027 and 2028, selective resistance achieves active support.
It will be a substantial portion of society.
They hope 15 to 30 percent is what these radical leftists or progressives or whatever they are hoping for.
Now again, this has to bring you back to what, um, Rich Higgins' memo.
It is on the website of themalcashow dot com dot under resources talking about the red green access.
So right now we have the Muslim Brotherhood and Care connected with the communists and the Marxists and the Socialists and the Democrat Socialists of America.
And now they are also being funded by foreign countries.
So we have this whole thing erupting and you can go look at that.
But we do have to start to discuss how the United States of America will be dealing with this.
We just found out that we have 55 million visa holders in this country, and that's adding to the 20 million that Joe Biden's Autopenn presidency led into the box border, that's a quarter of the people in the United States of America are not American citizens.
At the, in the meantime, this is all ramping up all over the country.
And even worse, they have events coming up called Take Action, People versus Billionaires.
So the week of 821 to 827 is a week of action and organization.
Their partners are Purge Palantir, the Tesla Takedown, Mayday Strong, and Stop Billionaires.
So as I said, this is going to be escalating if we don't get in front of it.
They go on to say that they want to have a full revolution in America by 2028 to make sure that they have a full revolution.
The active campaign to oust leaders from power is not a foregone conclusion.
Historically it has failed, but in their documents they plan on a full and complete overthrow of the United States of America government.
So this is not left and right.
This is not Republican and Democrat.
This is much more like the communist Bolshevik revolution.
And if that's not bad enough, folks, we have a growing group.
group connected to the Revolutionary Communists International that just had a big event.
They claim to have a presence in seventy countries and they claim right now to have two point five million members in the United States of America.
And I have a pretty terrifying video for you from a Dallas event of this group of the revolutionary communists of international.
If you could play that video, I think it will really open some eyes of the communist meeting that they had.
unidentified
Leon Trotsky, the organizer of the insurrection, he said that two years before just two years before 1917, the tsarist military officers, the imperial officers.
This is a quote.
He said, they thought that the moderate liberals were extreme revolutionaries.
Well, the Bolsheviks, in their eyes, belong to the fourth dimension.
I think we belong to the fourth dimension for the Republicans that are talking about communism being the Democratic Party.
We'll show them the real communism.
Thank you.
Now, I'm not going to get into the weeds about how exactly a transfer of power could take place, but we did see a glimpse of revolutionary potential in this country in the summer of 2020.
Let's imagine another scenario like the upsurge of the George Floyd movement where millions and millions of people are pouring into the streets from coast to coast.
But instead of a spontaneous uprising, we're talking about an organized uprising, a coordinated general strike action that has units of workers that have been preparing for it in every industry and every workplace, that are organized as units preparing to do something more than just paralyze industry, to do something more than just bring society to a halt.
You have strike committees.
workers councils prepared in advance.
Now, I've heard comrades ask, what could it look like?
And again, we don't know exactly how these things are going to play out, but I don't think it's hard to picture.
I mean, we saw the drama in Congress this week where after a lot of a lot of intense debate there's a formal announcement that says the office of the Speaker of the House of the United States House of Representatives is hereby declared vacant.
Well, with a victorious transfer of power, I think we can make a similar announcement when it comes out.
It'll be a shorter one.
It'll be a shorter one.
The United States House of Representatives is hereby declared vacant.
Well, um...
Thank you.
melody krell
That was a course from Dr. Carlin B. and you can follow her on Substax.
She gets behind the scenes on all of that.
That was actually in New York, 2023.
And what I do have to tell you is that this is not a left and right Republican Democrat, black, white, gay, straight, none of the above, folks, none of the above.
We are being destroyed from within a controlled demolition of the United States of America.
And what I want to tell you is that this is all part of a long game.
Donald Trump, or even you could say this about Alex Jones or Steve Bannon or Roger Stone or Navarro or any of these people, they're not after me, they're after you and I'm in the way.
But really, the truth is they're not after America, they're after the world and America is in the way.
But not if we, the people, do not start acting like the Constitution and Bill of Rights are ours and that we live them.
And we go towards liberty and we fight back against overreach and surveillance and the manipulation and what is going on in cyberspace.
The people of the United States still have the power to push back against this.
And what these people want, these globalists are funding all this.
Every single one of these movements is being funded by the same globalist billionaire oligarchs that are running the controlled demolition of the United States in the hope of getting the Global Public Private Partnership Agenda 2030 on the whole global stage being controlled by, I guess, Brussels and Geneva and Wall Street and then probably mainly the City of London.
But listen, we are under danger in America.
This is not left and right.
It is just not real.
That doesn't exist right now.
It is for liberty, freedom, the constitution, the Bill of Rights and autodetermination.
Please, please stand up, speak up, become a leader in your community.
You have to be the one that is Paul Revere in your sphere of influence.
We need to say enough is enough.
alex jones
Ultimate Life Force is a pretty ostentatious name.
But when we're sitting back thinking what the name of this new incredible supplement should be, that's really what it is.
Now you know because of the COVID saga and the assaults, the man-made virus and the poison so-called vaccines that do the exact same thing order your body to create the toxic spike protein that there have been a lot of great anti-spike protein detox formulas have come out and i promoted them and i bought a lot of our friends and family and given it to them but so many times the doctors and people i talk to that say hey these are good detox will say well this has got some of what you want this has got some of what else you want so you know tell your friends or
family to take these two together so about a year ago it's taken us that long to bring this out I said to myself, well, let me check with formulators and doctors and experts and say, you know, would it be good to combine some of the best-selling formulas and put everything into it, a kitchen-sink approach.
They said absolutely none of this interacts badly with each other.
It's just all really well-known healthy compounds for your body.
But just one of the things that is in this new formula, Ultimate Life Force at the AlphaShellshore.com is NAC.
400 milligrams of high quality, and that is a big dose, along with everything else in it.
Now remember, during COVID, Fauci and others demonized NAC and tried to ban its sale.
I mean, how crazy is that?
It's just good for your body overall.
It's the precursor and breaks down into glutathion, which is the number one antioxidant in the body and the engine of cleaning out the cells.
So they were trying to demonize glutation basically, but glutation raw doesn't break down as well in the gut.
People take it as IV, but as NAC, it does.
And I'm not a scientist, I just read the material, do your own research, but it's amazing.
That's one of the ingredients in Ultimate Life Force, now available at thealexjonestore dot com dot Oh, and one other big point I want to make.
You can always subscribe for Ultramethylene Blue or Ultimate CMOS.
It's all ultimate because it's all the strongest out there.
Ultimate turmeric, least strong, 95% curcuminoid with other super anti-inflammatories.
Which again, it's not just about being anti-inflammatory.
It's good for your whole body.
That's what these ingredients do as well, but from a different angle.
It's important to understand that you can lock in these supplements, which sell out routinely, sometimes for months, by subscribing to a monthly delivery.
And anytime you want, you can cancel for free.
And then you get locked in a bigger discount on the future delivery and they hold it back so it's...
it never sells out but in an introductory offer we're offering 50 off on your subscription and that does it in perpetuity.
You lock that in.
It's not always like that.
It's usually 25% on supplements.
And so this is a hell of a deal.
50% off on Ultimate Life Force introductory offer out of the gates.
It's not just for detox.
It's good for your whole body.
Get yours today at thealuxonstore.com.
I've been hearing about this for years and now it's all the rage.
And about a year ago, they did a survey of the customers at thealuxonstore.com and said, what is it you want the most?
What product would you like to have?
Why don't you get that email?
And the number one thing was bovine colostrum.
This is the highest rated private labeled 2000 milligram per serving.
And if you don't know what colostrum is, let me tell you.
A cow is a mammal, we're a mammal.
A dog is a mammal, a blue whale is a mammal.
I know most of you know that.
And mammals drink milk from their mother's breasts.
The first milk of the first few weeks is called colostrum, and it's more clear and it's full of all of the immunity and all the super nutrients.
And it's basically God's vaccine.
We've got the best bovine colostrum that we're introducing right now that you're going to find anywhere.
Cellular recovery and defense matrix.
It's also incredible for gut health and flora.
Immune support.
Natural compounds strengthen your body's defenses against toxins and stress.
Muscle recovery aid promotes faster tissue repair and reduces soreness post-workout or strain.
Stress and energy balance delivers calm, focused energy with natural adaptogens.
No caffeine crashes.
Toxin defense supports detox pathways to flush out environmental pollutants and free radicals.
Enhance nutrient absorption.
Improves nutrient uptake for better overall health without fillers.
It's a hassle.
I mean, because you only get this for a few weeks after the cow has a baby.
It's the next best thing to mommy's milk.
So it's all the rage for years.
Everybody's going totally insane about it.
I'm going to be taking it.
This is next level.
And I'll be completely honest with you.
Everybody's been telling me to take colosterone for years.
I just, it's hard for me to start taking a supplement once I do and it works.
I stay on it.
I'm going to be taking this.
Export Selection