Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
Please stand by for further details. | ||
unidentified
|
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | |
you you Well, good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Welcome to The War Room. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, sitting in today for Owen Schroyer, coming to you live from the InfoWars headquarters here in Austin, Texas. | ||
Cannot explain to you how much news we have today and how many videos I need to get to. | ||
And there's literally more coming out by the minute. | ||
Donald Trump just did a big interview, as well as made some statements audio only on Air Force One, talking about all sorts of topics from Russia Gate to the Epstein debacle to a whole bunch of stuff in between. | ||
So I'm going to go to some of those clips. | ||
We're going to be talking about censorship with the UK censorship law, but also how big tech is involved and how it's coming to America very soon. | ||
And how, of course, what they're doing in the UK is not only just ridiculous on the face of it, but the purpose of it is just obviously from stopping the people of the country from expressing their opinions about the policies of the people who rule the country because it's just patently tyrannical. | ||
We'll get into that. | ||
And I don't even know how I'm going to tackle the censorship issue because we've got like nine different directions it's coming from. | ||
We're also going to be talking about Israel and the massive backlash they're experiencing for their campaign of genocide and deliberate starvation. | ||
It looks like they finally crossed a line or two and are going to get some pushback from it. | ||
They're changing their tactics. | ||
We'll lay that out for you. | ||
And we just have like a million more videos to show you. | ||
I don't know how I'm going to get to all of them. | ||
Let's just start with clip 33. | ||
This is Trump on Tulsi and going after Rushigate and Obama's proclivity towards treason. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
What they've done is so bad for this country. | ||
And it really started right at the 2016 election. | ||
And there's a difference when you know it and when you know it and it's all written down for that. | ||
I mean, it's all there. | ||
It's right there. | ||
The orders, the memos, the whole thing is right there. | ||
unidentified
|
Were you surprised when you saw it all light up? | |
I would have thought they maybe would have thrown it out. | ||
I don't know. | ||
You know, they handed it. | ||
They said put this in highly classified. | ||
It was in highly classified, you know, in areas that normally you wouldn't get to, but I guess when you put it in there, it's a file, right? | ||
And they got to it, and it's unbelievable. | ||
When you read it, it's unbelievable. | ||
A real hoax, you know, it's a real hoax. | ||
If they would devote their time to winning elections or if they devote their time to like greatness, making America great again, it would be because there's a certain genius to it, but it's also sick. | ||
And they're sick. | ||
And you look at Hillary Clinton, you look at all of the terrible things with the Steel Del CA, and you know it better. | ||
Nobody's covered it better than you, to be honest with you. | ||
I mean, you're sitting here so innocently talking to me like, oh, this is wonderful. | ||
You know the story better than I do. | ||
But it's incredible. | ||
It's all there now. | ||
It's in writing. | ||
And Tulsi's done a great job. | ||
You know, there were some people that really wanted Tulsi's. | ||
They thought she was going to do a fantastic job. | ||
And when you look, a lot of people would not have found it. | ||
They wouldn't have found it to be politically correct. | ||
Find it, okay? | ||
It would be easier not to. | ||
unidentified
|
And she's tough. | |
And she's tough. | ||
And she's smart. | ||
And she did. | ||
She went deep into the files and she found it. | ||
And what it says is just terrible. | ||
And look, this was an attempted coup. | ||
It was a failed coup. | ||
I mean, I get it. | ||
Here we are, him talking as president of the United States. | ||
So you almost say how did it happen? | ||
A failed coup. | ||
He also talked about why he didn't end up arresting Hillary Clinton. | ||
We'll show you that video. | ||
He's made some statements about Epstein, getting into his relationship with Epstein, like I've never heard before. | ||
We have the audio version of that that we'll show you in just a second. | ||
Again, just on the topic of Russia Gate. | ||
Apparently, the Wayback Machine, the Internet Archive time machine, we can go back and visit web pages as they looked in the past. | ||
Apparently, all the archived posts of former FBI agent Peter Strzzok, who helped lead the Trump-Russia hoax, have been removed from the Wayback Machine. | ||
So it looks like the Powers to be are taking this RussiaGate prosecution seriously as they are attempting, apparently, in a pretty obvious way, trying to cover up the evidence of the crimes that they committed. | ||
And that's part of the whole Russiagate thing that I'm a little bit confused at. | ||
They've been focusing entirely on Obama and everything that happened after Trump's election. | ||
But to me, the big crimes all occurred before he was elected, before the voting day. | ||
That's when all the insurance texts from Peter Strzok to Lisa Page all happened. | ||
That's where all the criminality happened. | ||
So I'm hoping they're going to get to that eventually. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is The War Room. | ||
Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroyer today, coming to you live from Austin, Texas. | ||
Donald Trump has made a number of statements in the last hour or so, and I'm going to bring you some clips from those, a full-length interview he did where he got into a number of different topics. | ||
We just played one of the clips about Russia Gate, where he's praising Tulsi Gabbard and her pursuit of this treasonous activity. | ||
We'll go to another one here where he explains why he never locked up Hillary Clinton. | ||
Of course, I think we all sort of know why. | ||
We all sort of assumed the reason, but it's nice to hear him actually talk about and enunciate it. | ||
But again, just on the Russiagate scandal, they've been focusing almost entirely on the post-election criminality of Obama and the leaking of information trying to destroy Trump's presidency once he was already elected. | ||
Again, I'm like concerned, actually, with how little we're hearing about everything that happened before Obama was elected. | ||
Because I have to admit, I don't exactly understand the charge if they're just saying that the Russiagate collusion hoax was there to make it more difficult for Trump to be president. | ||
Like obviously the intelligence community withheld information or obscured information or, you know, fed the media false information in order to make it more difficult for Trump to govern and to just cause him constant problems. | ||
But this was just like a regular thing with Trump. | ||
Literally go back, go back to the Wayback Machine and look at any headline from CNN from 2017 through 2020. | ||
And every single day, there were new fake scandals that Trump had to deal with and were causing all these problems. | ||
But I don't know how you charge treason for that. | ||
To me, all the treasonous stuff happened before Trump got elected. | ||
It was all the stuff in the lead up to 2016, because you have to remember, the whole point of the Russiagate investigation was not necessarily to frame Trump as a Russian agent. | ||
That was a convenient addition to their actual purpose of that mission, which was to stop Trump from becoming president. | ||
See, they thought if they could just get warrants to spy on him, then they could find information by spying on him, by going through his documents, by questioning his son and other people around him in the campaign. | ||
They thought that all we need is the warrant. | ||
If we can just make something up, we just get the warrant, then we'll have access to his communications, we'll have access to his documents, and then we'll find what we are really going to use to destroy him. | ||
Because I think they were under the impression that Trump was like one of them, that there would be blackmail material, that he would be involved in pay-for-play or some sort of criminal exchange. | ||
But he wasn't. | ||
So they didn't have anything. | ||
They also thought that this would be successful. | ||
They thought they'd get Trump on something or frame him as a Russian agent. | ||
And of course, they contributed to that by doing things in the FBI, like actually giving visa workarounds for Russian agents that they actually sent to Trump so they could point to and go, see, a Russian agent. | ||
He met with a Russian agent. | ||
We know because we sent him there. | ||
We sent her there to meet with him. | ||
So they tried to set him up. | ||
They tried to spy on him, thinking they would stop him from becoming president, thinking that once Hillary Clinton was in office, all of the malfeasance that they committed would go away. | ||
She would cover it all up. | ||
Why do you think they were texting so blatantly? | ||
This is our insurance plan. | ||
Don't worry about it, baby. | ||
We got Trump over the fire. | ||
Why do you think they were so out front with all of it? | ||
Why didn't they cover it up better? | ||
Because they thought they would succeed. | ||
They thought Hillary Clinton would be president, and then all of this would go away. | ||
In fact, it wouldn't just go away in terms of we wouldn't be investigating the criminal activity, treasonous activity that it took to try to frame Donald Trump. | ||
But they were going to continue to use the Russia hoax to try to maybe throw Trump in jail. | ||
Same reason they came up with the fake news appaulet that first burst onto the scene the day after the election. | ||
They were planning on doing all this stuff with Hillary Clinton in office so she could cover it up and she could be the quarterback of all of it. | ||
And they failed utterly. | ||
So again, I'm glad Tulsi Gabbard's going after this. | ||
I'm glad that there's not a end point where we all just forget that the president of the United States committed treason and tried to stop Donald Trump from becoming president by weaponizing the intelligence community. | ||
I'm glad that we're focused on that. | ||
But I do have to wonder why everything she's talking about is after the election when all of the criminality happened before the election. | ||
And I'm a little bit suspicious on that. | ||
But obviously the people in power seem to be taking this seriously, or at least, hell, somebody is. | ||
I don't know who has the power to remove web pages from the Wayback Machine, but somebody did. | ||
And I can't help but wonder, actually, I just realized this this second, but like two days ago, Internet Archive made some big deal with the United States government. | ||
Maybe the crew can find that. | ||
I can't remember exactly what it is, but either the Library of Congress is being absorbed into the Internet Archive or the Internet Archive is being taken over by the government to some degree. | ||
And if the crew can find me that story, we can dig into that and see if there's any connection there. | ||
But this to me is indicative of panic, right? | ||
Because it's obvious, because it's blatant, because they're very worried about this information getting out of there. | ||
Peter Strzok has had his X account wiped from the Wave Act machines. | ||
Here's the story. | ||
The Internet Archive just became an official U.S. federal library, July 25th. | ||
So that's very interesting. | ||
So the Internet Archive became a U.S. federal library. | ||
The new status means archived users gains access to a trove of government documents. | ||
They got some sort of agreement with the American government, and a mere four days later, Peter Strzok's X account is wiped from the Wayback Machine, which is a part of the Internet Archive. | ||
Wonder if there's a connection there. | ||
I wonder. | ||
Obviously, doesn't mean these are going to go away, but that's what you do when you're trying to cover things up. | ||
Meanwhile, FBI raided Mar-a-Lago in search of RussiaGate files, according to Devin Nunez. | ||
Chair of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, Devin Nunez, says it's now clear the federal agents, what the federal agents were really after during their Mar-a-Lago raid nearly three years ago, classified documents related to the discredited Russia-Trump investigation known as Crossfire Hurricane. | ||
In an interview on Fox News' Sunday Morning Futures, Nunez, who's now chairman of the President's Intelligence Advisory Board, said the Biden administration was desperate to stop then-candidate Donald Trump from returning to office, and the Mar-a-Lago raid was part of that effort. | ||
Whatever they were looking for, they clearly couldn't find, Nunez says. | ||
They were trying to stop President Trump from being re-elected. | ||
So just, I guess, throw that on the pile. | ||
Throw that on the pile of crimes committed against President Trump and, in effect, the American people trying to destroy our ability to choose our own leadership by falsifying crimes or lying to the press or trying to seize classified documents by claiming that Trump was in fact the one using classified documents incorrectly or irresponsibly. | ||
And of course, the sort of silver lining of all of this is that they taught Trump an important lesson. | ||
And it's a lesson we've been trying to tell Trump since he got into office, which is these people aren't playing games. | ||
This is not the America you grew up believing in, where Republicans and Democrats would fight it out, but they all had America in mind at the end of the day. | ||
And it was this big debate club where we just all tried to work on settling our differences and pursuing the best policy possible. | ||
The Democrats, in particular, are rabid dogs. | ||
They cannot be reasoned with. | ||
They will not stop on their own volition. | ||
They have to be stopped. | ||
They have to be confronted. | ||
And the Republicans, of course, are just playing footsie. | ||
They just think this is all fun and games. | ||
Trump, at least, seems to be taking the threat of the Democrats seriously. | ||
I know I was watching Alex earlier talking to Robert Barnes, and it's absolutely true. | ||
And it's, again, a sentiment I keep trying to emphasize, which is like, we're running out of time. | ||
We're very, very rapidly running out of time. | ||
And if the Democrats pull some shenanigans or maybe just succeed because of Trump's Israel connections and, you know, dominate in 2018 or I'm sorry, 2026, the midterms, that's it. | ||
Like, it's over. | ||
The Trump administration is not going to be able to accomplish anything if the Democrats have the Congress and the Senate. | ||
And, you know, come 2028, it'll be Comrade AOC as, you know, president for life. | ||
And I shouldn't even say it like that because it's not a joke because these people are insane because we've seen how rabid and violent and sick they are for the four years under Biden when they were claiming that parents talking at teachers organizations were domestic terrorists or hauling fathers of eight away at gunpoint in front of their children because they were charged with sitting quietly outside of an abortion clinic. | ||
Like we know what the left is capable of and capable of justifying. | ||
And we know the media is perfectly willing to be complicit in their crimes. | ||
So we don't have time to play games with these people. | ||
We have to crush them. | ||
We have to defeat them utterly. | ||
We have to completely disempower them in every possible way for the sake of our country. | ||
Not out of vengeance, not because we're vindictive, but because I don't want our country to be given over to a bunch of rabid psychopaths who will hunt me down for thought crime. | ||
Okay, so let's take this seriously. | ||
Let's throw these people in prison. | ||
Let's stop the criminals from committing their criminal acts so we can all live in peace and succeed together. | ||
But to do that, these people have to be punished severely as a symbol, as a lesson to everybody else to come after them. | ||
You can't get away with this in America. | ||
And Trump has a comment on this. | ||
Just for emphasis, and we'll go to clip 32 here in just a second. | ||
But this was posted on Reddit Lies on X. It's a post from Reddit from Ask a Liberal. | ||
It's the Ask a Liberal subreddit. | ||
And they say, what is the left and or liberal stance on what happened with Ruby Ridge? | ||
Now, in case you don't know, what happened with Ruby Ridge is a man was asked by a federal agent to saw his shotgun down. | ||
He did. | ||
And then federal agents came in and killed him and his entire family, even though they'd never hurt anybody and never really did anything wrong and had moved out to the boonies to try to avoid conflict with society. | ||
They were hunted down like dogs. | ||
Now, the response to this, massively upvoted and as the top response in the Ask a Liberal subreddit, is, I'm sad the dog died. | ||
I'll openly admit my bias when I say I have no problem with the government dealing with gun-loving religious fanatics that have a propensity for violence in an overly heavy-handed way. | ||
I just have no tolerance for it. | ||
They're terrorists. | ||
Okay. | ||
Okay. | ||
So just to let you know where the mindset of our enemies are, they understand nothing, but have very strong feelings about it, right? | ||
They have no idea anything about the story, no concept as to what the crime was or why anything happened, but they don't care. | ||
But they genuinely don't care. | ||
They hate you and they want the government to kill you because you like guns, I guess, or are religious. | ||
That's enough for them. | ||
So just, you know, just to emphasize what Alex was saying earlier, what I've been saying over and over ever since Trump got into office is like, we got a deadline here. | ||
We got a very severe deadline to meet here to save the country, to not all be ruby ridged by the leftists, you know, piece by piece if they ever get back into power. | ||
Here's Donald Trump explaining that the left taught him this lesson. | ||
And, you know, we can only trust that he's learned this lesson thoroughly and will not make the same mistake as last time of letting his enemies go. | ||
Okay, here's Donald Trump on why he never arrested Hillary Clinton. | ||
Yeah, so, you know, we had Hillary Clinton down to whatever we wanted to do with her, and I felt it was inappropriate. | ||
She's the wife of a president. | ||
She was the Secretary of State, and we could have done a very big number. | ||
And I said, we don't want to be doing that. | ||
Let's, you know, put it into the country and not. | ||
The concept of putting her in jail, indicting her, all the things that you have to do, you know, it's tough stuff. | ||
And I said, we don't want to do that. | ||
In fact, you remember I made speeches when I mentioned her name. | ||
They started locking her. | ||
And I said, no, no, this is after we won. | ||
We just won. | ||
And I said, we have to get back to, we want to heal. | ||
And yet they did it to me. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
So I feel differently. | ||
I mean, I'm a human being. | ||
I have my feelings too. | ||
And so I feel differently about it. | ||
Obama, what he did was terrible. | ||
What Brennan did and Clapper and Comey and all these lightweights. | ||
I mean, they're stupid people, actually. | ||
But what they did, and so unnecessary. | ||
And they made it really hard. | ||
But ultimately, I don't know, they toughen you up. | ||
You either learn that you can do that. | ||
How many people could handle that? | ||
I've had so many people said, how did you handle that every day? | ||
And they come up with these different scams. | ||
They're all scams. | ||
And they're still doing it. | ||
You know, they're doing it now. | ||
Yes, we should have thrown Hillary Clinton in prison. | ||
Again, this has been obvious for a very long time, but it's good to see Trump saying, you know, I learned my lesson. | ||
They taught me, right? | ||
They did it to me. | ||
So I feel differently now. | ||
And again, it is sad that our country is just run by criminals and that in order to save our country, we're going to have to throw former presidents in prison, former secretaries of state need to go away for a long time. | ||
That sucks. | ||
That's very indicative of how far we've fallen as a country, but it just has to happen. | ||
It actually just has to happen. | ||
Because remember, there's this inequality. | ||
I call it disequality or like inequity. | ||
There's a difference, right? | ||
There's a difference between Donald Trump did something and Hillary Clinton did the same thing and Trump's being punished and Hillary Clinton's not. | ||
And that would be unfair if They did the same thing and one was punished, one wasn't. | ||
Instead, we have the Democrats just outright treason, just outright manipulation, lying to the press, creating warrants when there shouldn't be, lying to the FISA court, covering it all up, getting away with all of it, and they aren't punished. | ||
Donald Trump, meanwhile, they try to throw him in jail because of a fine or because of a loan that he paid off to a bank that had no problem with how everything went down. | ||
So it's not like, well, we committed treason and they committed treason and we said, well, we better not just this time. | ||
It's like, no, they are insane. | ||
They are criminal. | ||
They need to be punished because you see that even when we don't do anything wrong, even when Trump is not a tyrant, even when Trump doesn't do what he should have done the first time, throw Hillary Clinton in prison, there's no goodwill. | ||
There's no like, oh, well, you know, Trump, you know, he didn't throw Hillary in prison, so we owe him one. | ||
They don't think like that. | ||
They don't take your goodwill or your kindness as a gift to show thanks. | ||
They see it as weakness and stupidity because they would have done it to you if they had the chance. | ||
So you got to do it to them when you have the chance. | ||
At this point, it's only fair because they actually tried to throw Trump in prison when he didn't do anything wrong. | ||
So again, our entire government setup is designed for precedence. | ||
Precedence, right? | ||
If somebody, if the whole reason that like our parties are kept in check is because the idea is if you do something, we're going to do it when we're in power. | ||
And so when you're in power, you go, well, we better not do that because they might be in power next. | ||
And we don't want to set that precedent. | ||
But Democrats keep setting these precedents and Republicans don't do anything about it. | ||
It's like, well, if we were in, what if we did it? | ||
You know, what if it was the other way around? | ||
It's like, no, it should be. | ||
No, it has to be actually. | ||
Actually, for our system to function, the threat of retribution is necessary. | ||
And when you're not doing what they do, when you aren't following the precedent that's set, you're setting yourself up for failure. | ||
You're actually destroying the whole system. | ||
You actually just have one side that's willing to use every lever of power in whatever way they can possibly manage and the other side that refuses to ever lift it, even when their cause is just and the crimes that the Democrats commit are actually real and damaging to the country, not just something made up by some DA in Georgia. | ||
Now, Trump made some other comments, not on interview, but audio only, about Jeffrey Epstein as well as the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. | ||
We'll go first to clip number 34. | ||
This is Trump on Air Force One talking about his experience with Epstein back when he kicked him out of Mar-a-Lago. | ||
This is the first time, as far as I know, that Trump's ever commented on the record about his personal relationship with Jeffrey Epstein prior to the trials of Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
unidentified
|
watch. | |
Were some of them young women? | ||
Well, I don't want to say, but everyone knows the people that were taken. | ||
And it was the concept of taking people that worked for me as bad. | ||
But that was pretty well. | ||
And the answer is yes. | ||
People that work in this specific place was one of the best spaces in the world. | ||
And people were taking out of the species by him. | ||
In other words, other people would come and complain this guy is taking people from the space. | ||
I didn't know that. | ||
And then when I heard about it, I told him, I said, listen, we don't want you taking our people, whether it was or not. | ||
I don't want him taking people. | ||
He was fine. | ||
And not too long after that, he did it again. | ||
unidentified
|
And I said, out of here. | |
Did he have stolen persons that include Virginia Jeffrey? | ||
I don't know. | ||
I think she worked at the spa. | ||
I think so. | ||
I think that was one of the people. | ||
He stole her. | ||
And by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know. | ||
None whatsoever. | ||
So the story from Daily Mail, Trump says Epstein stole Virginia Juffrey and several other young female Mar-a-Lago spa workers. | ||
And of course, rather than actually dealing with and confronting what Trump actually said and how this comports with what we've been saying forever about Trump, because this was always the story that Epstein was a member at Mar-a-Lago and that Trump kicked him out of his club because he was recruiting young girls who worked there. | ||
Everybody's known this forever. | ||
The left isn't interested in that because it obviously shows that A, Trump didn't know what Epstein was doing, right? | ||
B, that he wasn't in favor of Epstein or friends with him, right? | ||
They want to portray Trump as best friends with Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
And he's like, oh, what, the guy kicked out of my spa 20 years ago? | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
And they're very outraged at the language. | ||
He stole a girl. | ||
He took a girl treating these women like, and it's like, okay, first of all, in the recording you just heard, the reporter said he took girls from you. | ||
So he was the one that used that vocabulary first and Trump echoed it when he answered the question. | ||
So even to frame this as Trump saying this, it's like, well, that's how the question was asked. | ||
So that's how he responded. | ||
But obviously he just means recruited. | ||
He means Jeffrey Epstein was recruiting young girls, his employees, which just as a business owner, finding good employees is a difficult thing to do. | ||
And when some dude comes in and is ostensibly a member of your club, but is really poaching your talent, you're not going to like that, obviously. | ||
But obviously Trump didn't know what exactly was happening with it. | ||
Here's Virginia Dufree talking about this. | ||
Clip number 35, talking about Maxwell approaching her at Mar-a-Lago. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Virginia, how did you meet her and what was her pitch to you? | |
I'm working at Mar-a-Lago, loving it. | ||
I'm working in the spa area. | ||
I was reading about anatomy and massage, and that's when D-Lynn came up to me and said, oh my God, You're reading a book about massage. | ||
And, you know, long story short, she told me that she knew of a man who was looking for a traveling masseuse. | ||
And if he liked me, then I would get educated and I would become a real massage scientist. | ||
So, yeah, I mean, it was the dream of a lifetime until I got there. | ||
And the abuse was immediate. | ||
unidentified
|
It has been reported that they would prey on young girls who were vulnerable. | |
She could smell the vulnerability on the person. | ||
I told them a little bit about my past and how I'd been abused. | ||
So immediately it was like the Cheshire Smile is what I call it. | ||
And I asked her, I said, why are you having all these girls come in and sleep with your boyfriend? | ||
And she was like, so I don't have to do it all the time, you know? | ||
So she made like a joke out of it. | ||
unidentified
|
Why do you think she did it? | |
She did it to keep Jeffrey happy, for sure. | ||
She did it because she loves the control of people. | ||
Jeffrey was a sick pedophile, but she was the mastermind. | ||
unidentified
|
What would justice look like for you when it comes to Geilen Maxwell? | |
I would like to see Geelan stay in jail forever. | ||
I would like her to apologize for what she's done to me and so many others. | ||
So that's Virginia Jufrey, who, of course, tragically died apparently by suicide not long ago. | ||
Very, very suspicious timing in that, of course. | ||
So Trump confirms he kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for recruiting girls there. | ||
Some we've known forever, but first time Trump's commented. | ||
Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroyer today. | ||
There's a post from Virginia Jouffre in 2019 saying she would never commit suicide. | ||
And then right as the Epstein topic starts to come to the fore again, she mysteriously commits suicide shortly after being hit by a bus. | ||
It's all very suspicious. | ||
I got so many videos to go to today. | ||
It's just unreal. | ||
The good news is like six of them are just a Sydney Sweeney ad. | ||
And I'm probably not even going to talk about that. | ||
Maybe I'll touch on it. | ||
But I think we'll take a direction from Trump here. | ||
We got one more video. | ||
Again, he's done a couple interviews and given a couple comments in the last hour or so. | ||
We just showed about three of them about Tulsi Gabbard and Rushigate, why he wouldn't arrest Hillary Clinton and Jeffrey Epstein. | ||
Let's go to the next most controversial topic in America right now, and that is Gaza. | ||
Here's Trump commenting on the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. | ||
Clip 39. | ||
Again, this is indicative. | ||
It's an indicator. | ||
It is a sea change happening. | ||
There's a tidal shift going on right now. | ||
And it may just be that Israel has finally gone too far. | ||
They may have finally gone too far. | ||
I mean, personally, I would have expected too far to have been at least a year ago, maybe a year and a half, something like that. | ||
But I guess this is it. | ||
And it leaves us in sort of an interesting dilemma because these people, these organizations, these nations even, that have spent the last two years, year and a half, defending everything Israel did and telling us all the terrible stories about all of the horrors that Israel have caused, they're all Hamas propaganda. | ||
It's all fake, right? | ||
I mean, this was absurd from, you know, the 15th of October, right? | ||
Whenever, I mean, the first real act of absurdity in this conflict was when they were bombing everywhere in Gaza, and then they bombed a hospital, and they're like, oh, no, that wasn't us. | ||
And since then, they've destroyed like every hospital in Gaza. | ||
You would have thought maybe like bombing hospitals, maybe killing more journalists than were killed in all of the wars of the 20th century combined. | ||
The Lavender program using AI to identify enemies and bomb them. | ||
The daddy's home program, which was in addition to the lavender, where they would wait until the person was home so they could kill the whole person's family. | ||
The fact that those AI programs had something like a 20 to 50 person acceptable range of death where they could kill 50 people as long as they got one Hamas person. | ||
And the Hamas person wasn't even necessarily Hamas. | ||
It's just they were graded highly on the AI scoring list. | ||
You would have thought maybe at one of those points, the international community would have stood up and said, this is too much. | ||
Maybe when they're using drones with machine guns mounted on them to hunt children, that might have been too much. | ||
Apparently not. | ||
This is off the top of my head, but just a few of the crimes against humanity and just absolute examples of horror that Israel has blessed the world with in the last year and a half. | ||
You would have thought at one point the international community would have said, enough is enough. | ||
This is ridiculous. | ||
This is unnecessary. | ||
This is just murder for murder's sake and you have to stop. | ||
But that never happened. | ||
They always had an excuse. | ||
They always had a cover-up. | ||
They always had some reason as to not believe the stories that were evidenced with your own eyes. | ||
But now they're all admitting that actually Israel is starving everybody to death. | ||
France is saying they're going to recognize Palestine in response to the horrors being perpetrated on Gaza. | ||
The UK has now said, if this doesn't end by, I think, September, they said, I'll show you the clip in just a second. | ||
They said they're going to support a two-state solution and try to give Palestine the rights of any other sovereign nation. | ||
These are unprecedented statements that they've never made before. | ||
These are the same people that spent the last year and a half telling us Israel is the most moral army in the world and that they've never done anything wrong. | ||
There's a little bit of an inconsistency there, right? | ||
So you spend two years, year and a half, telling us that everything Israel does that's evil and wrong and brutal and horrific is just Hamas propaganda. | ||
But now you admit they're doing the worst thing that they've been accused of, which is deliberately starving hundreds of thousands of people to death and shooting them when they go to get food. | ||
So do you want to maybe go back and like rethink all of those things you were defending them for earlier? | ||
I mean, if this is what they're doing, then doesn't that Give some credence to all of the other stories over the last two years as to the way they've been acting and their actual intentions and the fact that they commit war crimes and the fact that they are committing genocide. | ||
Does it make you rethink any of that? | ||
Or may want to eat some humble pie? | ||
Maybe want to eat crow from the fact that you've been defending these murderous psychopaths for two years? | ||
Does that come up in any conversations? | ||
Or are you just pretending like this and this alone is the only thing they've done wrong? | ||
Oh, well, now that they're starving children to death, this is the first thing they've done wrong. | ||
They finally crossed a line. | ||
Frankly, I'm just glad that the international community is at least making noise about this. | ||
And even Donald Trump in this video says that what's happening is terrible. | ||
He just doesn't seem to understand or recognize or acknowledge the fact that his administration and the choices that he's made and his complicity with Benjamin Netanyahu is the only reason any of this is happening. | ||
So, again, a bit of a disconnect there. | ||
This is terrible. | ||
This is awful. | ||
This is horrific. | ||
But also, it's entirely my fault. | ||
He doesn't say that, but that is the fact. | ||
Here's Donald Trump commenting on the starvation campaign in Gaza on Air Force One earlier today. | ||
unidentified
|
Her role in talking to you about the war in Ukraine and perhaps it being part of your evolution in thinking. | |
Have you discussed the crisis in Gaza and the terrifying horrific sheets? | ||
She thinks it's terrible. | ||
She sees the same pictures that you see that we all see. | ||
I think everybody will listen to the kids. | ||
There's nothing you can see when you see the kids. | ||
Those are kids, you know, whether they talk starvation or not. | ||
Those are kids that are starving. | ||
They are starving. | ||
You see the mothers, they love them so much. | ||
There's just nothing they seem to be able to do. | ||
They got to get them food. | ||
And we're going to get them food. | ||
So there is Donald Trump saying, you know, it's sad. | ||
We got to get them food. | ||
Well, I mean, you know, Israel basically relies on us for everything. | ||
I don't know how difficult it would be to get them food. | ||
We are the superpower here. | ||
I mean, it is absurd. | ||
We're talking about airlifting food into Gaza like the Berlin airlift, like Israel is the Soviets, and we're having to feed the people that they're starving. | ||
Yeah, that makes them the bad guy. | ||
I don't know how much more clear that could be. | ||
But why? | ||
Why could we possibly need to airdrop food supplies when Israel is our greatest ally? | ||
Didn't we spend millions of dollars to build a dock ostensibly to deliver aid to Gaza? | ||
What happened with that? | ||
Oh, it floated out to sea after a couple months? | ||
That's right. | ||
Oh, it was only used to deliver food to the IDF? | ||
That's right. | ||
I remember that. | ||
I remember that now. | ||
The dock that we built to deliver food to Gazans that only lasted a month, and then all the food that we delivered went directly to the people committing the genocide. | ||
Amazing stuff. | ||
I have so many videos about this and surrounding this. | ||
I just got to go to them. | ||
And they're horrific and they're tragic and they're horrible, but that's Israel. | ||
I mean, that's just what Israel does. | ||
I can't think of a single example of them showing mercy or being decent in any possible way. | ||
So, you know, I guess we should be used to this by now. | ||
But again, I just want to emphasize, and in fact, let's go to the video of the UKPM. | ||
Here is Kier Starmer, Clip 23, Prime Minister of the UK, saying they will recognize Palestine at the UN in September if nothing changes. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
On the 7th of October, 2023, Hamas perpetrated the worst massacre in Israel's history. | ||
Every day since the horror has continued. | ||
The hostages are still being held today. | ||
The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering. | ||
Now, in Gaza, because of a catastrophic failure of aid, we see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. | ||
The suffering must end. | ||
Yesterday I discussed this with President Trump, and we're mounting a major effort to get humanitarian supplies back in by air, and UK aid has been airdropped into Gaza today, and crucially, by land. | ||
We need to see at least 500 trucks entering Gaza every day. | ||
But ultimately, the only way to bring this humanitarian crisis to an end is through a long-term settlement. | ||
So we are supporting the US, Egyptian, and Qatari efforts to secure a vital ceasefire. | ||
That ceasefire must be sustainable, and it must lead to a wider peace plan. | ||
All right, very strong. | ||
Very strong words. | ||
He says that they'll recognize Palestine as a nation in September if something doesn't change. | ||
Very strong words for people that have literally been complicit in all of this the entire time. | ||
Very strong words. | ||
And again, all the people that are now suddenly realizing that Israel is starving children to death. | ||
I mean, I just want to ask, like, if the country is willing to starve children to death, does it not make you second guess or question all of the other lies you've been told about it? | ||
That Israel would never, they would just never do any of this stuff that they're all doing on video all the time. | ||
It's just insane. | ||
So we're seeing this massive shift. | ||
We're seeing this massive change. | ||
Apparently, they've gone too far now. | ||
Marjorie Taylor Green has called out Israel's genocide in Gaza, and she calls it that. | ||
On X Monday evening, Marjorie Taylor Green castigated fellow MAGA Republican Representative Randy Fine for denying the starvation crisis in Gaza. | ||
Well, that's not what he did. | ||
No, he said they are starving and he wants them to starve. | ||
Sorry, that's a little misinformation there. | ||
He didn't deny the starvation crisis. | ||
He may have done that too. | ||
But more importantly, he said, let them starve. | ||
He said, let them starve. | ||
Also, nobody's starving, but they should. | ||
So that's not denying The starvation crisis. | ||
That's endorsing it. | ||
Big fat idiot. | ||
Imagine being a 500-pound galute and saying, until then, starve away. | ||
You know, you got like the classic phrase from the French Revolution, Marie Antoinette being told that the people are starving, they have no bread. | ||
She says, let them eat cake. | ||
They don't eat bread. | ||
Why don't they eat cake instead? | ||
Representing this like out-of-touch aluchhia. | ||
I can't even comprehend that people are starving because she's so privileged. | ||
It's a little bit different than let them starve. | ||
Like it's so much crazier that there's a congressman in America saying, let them starve because he'd rather, you know, watch children waste away into nothing for a foreign power. | ||
I mean, it would be bad enough. | ||
But he wouldn't even say that to America. | ||
He wouldn't even say that about America's enemies. | ||
He never would. | ||
That's why he shouldn't be a congressman. | ||
Green's reaction came to a new Republic story on APAC hiding its endorsement of Fine following his controversial comments last week, in which he dismissed a report about the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza, including children, as Muslim terror propaganda. | ||
Release the hostages, Fine wrote. | ||
Until then, starve away. | ||
Marjorie Taylor Green has said, I can only imagine how Florida's 6th District feels about their representative that they were told to vote for, openly calling for starving innocent people and children, Greene wrote. | ||
It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that October 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned. | ||
But so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza. | ||
So there you have Marjorie Taylor Greene calling it a genocide, which it absolutely is, and calling out big fat Randy Fine, who's been so objectionable, even APAC can't stomach it anymore. | ||
Not even APAC wants to be associated with the GOP rep anymore. | ||
That's the headline from New Republic. | ||
Has Florida Representative Randy Fine's shameless cheerleading for death gone too far for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee? | ||
It would be a shock. | ||
It'd be a shock, if so. | ||
But I guess it's just one of those things. | ||
I don't know. | ||
See, if you say that Israel is starving Gazans and you're not Jewish, then you're an anti-Semite. | ||
But if you say Israel should start Gazans and you're Jewish, it's just patriotism, I guess? | ||
I don't know. | ||
I'm not really sure how that works. | ||
But he has been removed from the APAC list. | ||
As if this is going to make anybody think he's anything other than what he obviously is. | ||
Now, Israel, in response to the incredible outrage over their deliberate starvation tactic, which of course, it's not a matter of them targeting children. | ||
It's a matter of children just being the first to die in starvation conditions, as always. | ||
This is one of the worst and most painful ways to die. | ||
And the first to die from starvation are the suckling children, because when mom can't get enough nutrients, she stops producing milk. | ||
And it's babies who rely on nursing who are the first to go. | ||
In fact, we had a, I didn't grab the video, but it was one of the more objectionable, not the most, because I mean, that's a pretty high bar to set, but one of the more objectionable statements from an Israeli official in the recent past where they are literally laughing at a mother whose baby died, making jokes that, well, she can just eat her. | ||
You know, kind of like the modest proposal when there was starvation in Ireland and they said, why don't they just eat the Israeli babies? | ||
It's like that, but not a joke, but not satire, but actually what they believe. | ||
And it's just absolutely horrifying. | ||
But I got enough videos to go to outside of that. | ||
But of course, it wouldn't be Israel if they weren't both committing crimes against humanity and lying about it. | ||
You got to have both of these things. | ||
Clip 16, here's the IDF saying that not only is the IDF not blocking humanitarian aid, they're not starving, they're actually facilitating it. | ||
They're facilitating the humanitarian aid. | ||
They're the good guys of the most moral army in the world. | ||
And nobody's starving. | ||
They're feeding the Gazans because of what good people they are. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Behind me are boxes filled with aid, food, goods, and medical supplies, all intended for the civilians of Gaza. | ||
I cannot emphasize enough. | ||
Israel is not blocking humanitarian aid. | ||
We are facilitating its entry every single day. | ||
Over 250 trucks were transferred this week alone, coordinated and approved by Israel. | ||
Nearly 600 more were collected by international organizations inside Gaza. | ||
Yet, as you can see behind me, there are boxes filled with supplies still waiting to be collected and distributed. | ||
In order to reach even more civilians, the IDF has conducted an airdrop operation of humanitarian supplies led by COGAT with international aid organizations. | ||
This is so stupid. | ||
We can check it out. | ||
I mean, he's just lying. | ||
We just don't need to listen to the lies. | ||
It's just absurd. | ||
I don't even mean to lie. | ||
I mean, it's like the most tragic thing in the world, but to hear this guy like, we are working on getting it. | ||
Are you having trouble delivering? | ||
I mean, you control the entire country. | ||
You surround it entirely. | ||
You're occupying it there. | ||
And what do you mean you can't get the, what the hell are you talking about? | ||
Just lies. | ||
It's just lies. | ||
It's okay. | ||
We don't have to actually debate them or give them any credence. | ||
This is just lying. | ||
He's just lying to you. | ||
He says Israel is not blocking humanitarian aid. | ||
Let's go to a video of them blocking humanitarian aid, club number 19 here, and go to this. | ||
Here's a, and this isn't Israeli officials, to be clear. | ||
These are Israeli civilians blocking the aid trucks and waving the Israeli flag and preventing the aid trucks from getting to where they're trying to go. | ||
So they say Israel is not blocking the aid trucks. | ||
This video of Israelis blocking aid trucks would suggest otherwise, as would all of the people there. | ||
And by the way, the aid that they have been allowing in, they've been using As a giant mousetrap. | ||
So they've got this starving population, so they set up a food distribution site, and then they bomb or shoot at the people who are lined up for food. | ||
unidentified
|
So it's awful. | |
It's just all, just awful. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 13. | ||
Here's an ex-IDF soldier talking about what Israel really does with all of the aid that they claim to be desperate to get to Gaza, which again, it's just, I mean, it's just insulting. | ||
It's like, we get it. | ||
You guys are starving them to death. | ||
You guys are genocidal. | ||
You're evil. | ||
We understand. | ||
Like, just stop lying to us about it. | ||
Just say, and some of them do. | ||
Some of them do. | ||
Come out and say it. | ||
I mean, we have here. | ||
Israeli minister says, it would be moral to starve 2 million Gazans, but no one in the world would let us. | ||
Israel finance minister Beziel Smotrick said it may be just and moral to starve 2 million Gazan residents until Israel hostages are returned, but nobody in the world would let us. | ||
This is back from August of 2024. | ||
But clearly, you know, the idea that they're even outraged at the fact that they're starving, they're not. | ||
They think it's moral. | ||
They think it's moral to starve children to death, our greatest allies. | ||
Let's go to clip 13. | ||
Here's the ex-IDF soldier telling the truth. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
As someone who has some knowledge of military strategy, it became very clear to me after a few months that Israel was not fighting this war in order to win it. | ||
The fact that Hamas remains in control of large parts of Gaza after so long tells you a lot about the priorities of the IDF and of the government in this war. | ||
So when I started seeing that at no point was there a day after plan to replace Hamas, that areas that are still controlled by Hamas are not being invaded by the IDF, and that the decision to stop bringing in aid or lessen the aid considerably is not hurting Hamas at all, because Hamas can get the aid, but it's hurting civilians. | ||
Instead, I started realizing that something else is at play here. | ||
Took me far too long. | ||
It took me many months to understand that. | ||
Then I also have contacts in the IDF. | ||
And they started telling me that the IDF is going after the clean water supply, every well, every aquifer, that they're going after every hospital, that they're trying to destroy basically the infrastructure that allows you to live in Gaza. | ||
And they're using the same effort and the same tools that they should be using in order to defeat Hamas to do that. | ||
So Hamas is in power, but every single house in several cities in Gaza has been destroyed. | ||
That's where the effort is going. | ||
And that means that there is no reasonable doubt that they're trying to win this war. | ||
And more so, there have been offers on the table for Hamas to stop controlling Gaza. | ||
That's been part of the hostage deals that have been offered. | ||
And Israel has refused to do that and instead has insisted on things like the GHF continuing aid and insisted on creating a concentration camp in Rafah instead of reaching a ceasefire. | ||
All of these things indicate that the goal of the IDF and the government is very clearly to eradicate the Palestinian people and not to defeat Hamas. | ||
And that's been obvious since the beginning. | ||
Footage just four days ago shows Hamas terrorists. | ||
You're showing me tweets from the IDF. | ||
Why is this on my screen? | ||
Take this down immediately. | ||
Take this down immediately. | ||
Do you want to see? | ||
Okay, do we have questions about the starvation that's happening? | ||
My God. | ||
And we can go to clip number 21. | ||
Starvation in Gaza at a horrible level. | ||
Look at this mother and her child that is basically just a skeleton now. | ||
You can go to clip 22. | ||
We can just roll these as B-roll. | ||
Now, the latest from this is that Nenya, who proposes to annex parts of Gaza and attempt to appease far-right minister, that's Smotrik, the guy who we just showed you a year ago, was saying, of course, it's perfectly moral to starve 2 million Palestinians to death. | ||
We just couldn't get away with it. | ||
Well, they were getting away with it. | ||
Now, you know, everybody with morals and a human soul is turning against them. | ||
Under the proposed ban, Israel will gradually begin annexing parts of Gaza if Hamas does not agree to a ceasefire. | ||
Nanyahu told the ministers the plan is supported by the Trump administration, which again just makes us complicit, which is why it's necessary to talk about all of this. | ||
We can go down to clip number, well, we'll have to wait for the next one because I want to show that whole thing. | ||
So they want to annex Gaza completely and basically have said we're not going to even try to have a ceasefire. | ||
Even though Hamas is as early as the 8th or 9th of October was trying to make a deal to return all of the hostages, they refused that deal deliberately because they want the excuse to destroy and annex Gaza. | ||
It's also why they allowed October 7th to happen and continue unabated for hours on end. | ||
It's also why I think they moved the site of the festival that was attacked to be directly in the line of two different military bases that were the target of the Gaza raiders there on October 7th. | ||
But I got more videos to show you about this on the other side. | ||
And it'll sort of morph. | ||
It'll be a very convenient transition from what's going on in Israel and the backlash to that and the horrors they're committing to the censorship that they are imposing worldwide through forcing big tech to establish new offices of anti-Semitism monitoring, that sort of stuff. | ||
I saw earlier today somebody saying, Israel needs a PR iron dome. | ||
We need a public relations iron dome, which they are establishing. | ||
It's called censorship, and they're putting people in positions of power and forcing big tech companies to establish positions to allow these people in, as well as the Anti-Semitism Act and other things going forward in the U.S. government, as well as the way that the Online Safety Act in the U.K. is being used to silence opposition to what Israel is doing. | ||
They're creating a PR iron dome, and we'll talk about that on the other side after showing you more of what Israel is up to because it's just awful. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
Harrison Smith sitting in today for Owen Schroyer. | ||
second hour of the war room is on. | ||
I got a few more videos to show you here about what's going on in Israel. | ||
Again, what's happening in Israel now is worthy of note, specifically because of the reaction that the rest of the world is having. | ||
Again, whether it's the bombing of the aid convoy, the world food kitchen, or the AI programs that they use to eliminate targets, or the AI machine guns they have mounted outside of gates, or the drones that they fly around at night playing the sound of a baby crying, hoping to lure people out to then shoot them with a drone-mounted machine gun. | ||
You would think at any one of these points the outrage over these despicable acts would be enough for people of conscience to speak out against it. | ||
But so far, there's been a hell of a lot of silence from Western governments. | ||
Now, finally, as they commit just the most heinous act of barbarism the world has seen in 100 years, starving hundreds of thousands of people to death, as well as setting up food distribution sites for people who they then shoot and bomb. | ||
Finally, people are speaking out against this. | ||
The Netherlands just put Israel on a list, along with like Saudi Arabia and Yemen or something. | ||
It's the list of countries that are a danger to the Netherlands. | ||
So the Netherlands just put them on the list. | ||
France and England both talking about recognizing a Palestinian state. | ||
And that would be sort of beautifully ironic, is if the outcome of Israel's just relentless crimes against humanity, the attempted genocide, if it was, in fact, to achieve the seemingly impossible goal of establishing a legitimate Palestinian state, it would be something very beautiful about that. | ||
Let's go to clip number 17 here. | ||
This is an IDF whistleblower saying aid from a thousand trucks was buried in pits or burned. | ||
And I'll read along. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. | |
They say they openly admit there's a severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza, though not mass hunger. | ||
You're breaking news about significant humanitarian aid being destroyed, thrown away, discarded. | ||
What's going on? | ||
Buried, buried. | ||
It's being buried. | ||
IDF Doug Pitts. | ||
This is what's the story? | ||
They're sending trucks to Gaza. | ||
This isn't involving the hunger rights issue, the source says. | ||
unidentified
|
The problem is how aid is distributed. | |
Many don't receive the humanitarian aid, humanitarian assistance. | ||
It's a strategic, moral and political blow that's been hurting Israel's global standing. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, that's the worst thing, isn't it? | |
That's what Insider says. | ||
The trucks, 1,000 trucks in the past too much mint for Gaza, carrying aid, tons of food and supplies were destroyed. | ||
They were buried. | ||
They were burned by the army. | ||
Why didn't it enter Gaza? | ||
Why wasn't it allowed in? | ||
Who's supposed to bring it in? | ||
The mechanisms aren't working. | ||
unidentified
|
The mechanisms aren't working. | |
State security officials. | ||
There's a total disconnect. | ||
It's not properly organized. | ||
That's the problem. | ||
Everything, basically. | ||
We saw yesterday at the crossings. | ||
Thousands of items mint. | ||
Mean for Gaza waiting on the Palestinians. | ||
It's just ridiculous. | ||
It'll be buried soon. | ||
So apparently, IDF Whistleblower says a thousand trucks of aid were buried in pits. | ||
And they're like, oh, well, the organization's just not there. | ||
Oh, because you kicked out all the humanitarian people there. | ||
And, you know, this goes to what's happening in America as well, as one of the main forces who was actually helping the Palestinians was USAID. | ||
Another one was UNESCO. | ||
We just left UNESCO. | ||
And it's not a big surprise. | ||
I don't know how people don't get this. | ||
UNESCO feeds starving people, and Israel's trying to starve people. | ||
So we removed ourselves from UNESCO because our participation in UNESCO was hampering Israel's strategic goal of starving the Gazans into submission or forcing them to leave because we're Israel's slaves, as we're all learning. | ||
All right, welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, Harrison Smith here sitting in for Owen Schroyer. | ||
And we've got a rare comment from Trump actually treating the Gazans like human beings. | ||
This was a first for him. | ||
As we've pointed out many times before, when it comes to places like Ukraine or Russia, he's always the first to point out just the senseless loss of lives, the humanitarian costs, the fact that these were people that were being killed. | ||
And the numbers on your screen are not just digits. | ||
They represent souls being eradicated from the planet. | ||
And then you talk about Palestine and just be like, well, they should all just go away. | ||
And it's like, well, okay. | ||
Where's the humanitarian instinct for them? | ||
I get it for the guys in Ukraine. | ||
I feel that too. | ||
Do you not also feel that for the Palestinians? | ||
They're innocent after all. | ||
The vast, vast, vast majority of them. | ||
And again, there's this bizarre irony of organizations, governments who have been fully supportive of Israel finally, now that they're deliberately starving people to death, coming out and saying this is too much when they have vehemently defended Israel's outrageous activity for the last year and a half. | ||
But I'll take it, you know, whatever. | ||
Fine. | ||
If this is a bridge too far, then that's the bridge too far. | ||
Edge, I just wish you would have developed a conscience a year and a half ago and we could have prevented it from ever getting it to this point. | ||
Now, the latest numbers, the latest official numbers say there's 60,000 dead in Gaza. | ||
I have a hunch that it's a hell of a lot higher than that. | ||
But I did the math of that. | ||
That comes out to about 90 people a day, which I guess makes sense. | ||
I mean, maybe in some of the early days when they were bombing whole city blocks and stuff, you would have had a higher count. | ||
Nowadays, you're averaging like 40 to 50 deaths a day, which is still just absolutely astonishing and horrifying and just awful. | ||
And every day I wake up to headlines, it's like, Israel's killed 63 people since dawn. | ||
It's like, this is just wild. | ||
It's just wild how much death we've come to accept. | ||
And it just paints everything that they've said before this as absurd, where every time you'd point out like, Israel established a safe corridor and then bombed the corridor. | ||
Isn't that evil? | ||
And people would go, bah, well, it's war. | ||
What are you going to do? | ||
Yeah, it's war. | ||
Gee, what are you going to do? | ||
Not kill all the civilians? | ||
It's war, though, but it's war. | ||
And these things happen in war, and it's tragic. | ||
And Israel does everything it can to avoid this outcome, but it's war and it's just October 7th's fault all along. | ||
Is this war? | ||
I mean, are we seeing any images like what we see out of Israel? | ||
Are we seeing them from Ukraine? | ||
Are we seeing them from China? | ||
And the Taiwan, Thailand conflict, or not Taiwan, but the Thailand conflict going on. | ||
Did we see that in Afghanistan or Iraq or anywhere else? | ||
America has waged war. | ||
Why are we seeing it now? | ||
Since when is deliberately starving a population a part of war? | ||
Like, it's just gotten to the point that they just can't keep it up anymore. | ||
They can't keep the lies sustainable. | ||
It just doesn't work. | ||
And part of me is like, is this all just it's kind of been happening a lot recently. | ||
And maybe this is just the sort of abused dog aspect of being under the thumb of the globalists so long is that when anything good happens, I have to like look askance out. | ||
I have to be like, well, what's the real, what's the real thing happening here? | ||
Because what you have is things like, you know, all of the medical industries coming out and going, yeah, actually, transgenderism's bad. | ||
It's like, yeah, but that's been obvious the whole time. | ||
So why are you saying it now? | ||
Why is this happening now? | ||
Or even, you know, Kier Starmer or others, it's just the height. | ||
It's just like beyond absurd. | ||
I can't even wrap my mind around the fact that these people go from deliberately importing millions of people and then they'll give a speech where they're like, this is unsustainable. | ||
We've got a problem here. | ||
We've got to stop the dinghies. | ||
It's like, yeah, we know. | ||
You threw people in jail for saying that. | ||
Why are you saying it now? | ||
What's happening here? | ||
And part of me is just like, are they running the algorithms? | ||
Are they running the simulations? | ||
And they're determining like it's just too late now? | ||
Like in Europe, the people are, you know, mainstream establishment politicians are coming out and saying there's too much immigration. | ||
Is that just because it's like, okay, we're past the point of no return? | ||
Okay, they've run the numbers and it's like Europe is just on the track to collapsing and becoming a caliphate and they don't even have to like try anymore. | ||
The ball is rolling. | ||
It's going now. | ||
The demographic spillover point has occurred and now they can pretend like they're against it or something. | ||
I'm trying to wrap my mind around why so many people who have been spreading lies for decades are suddenly realizing the truth out of nowhere. | ||
Part of me thinks like, okay, Israel's just sort of run the algorithm. | ||
They've run the AI simulation and they're like, yeah, we won in Gaza now. | ||
So now we can, you know, now all of our proxies and Western governments can pretend to be against us now because it's already done. | ||
It's over. | ||
We've won. | ||
Now it's just a matter of sort of cleaning up the pieces. | ||
And so, yeah, you guys can come out against us now. | ||
Now you guys can, you know, act like you're standing up against us and we'll be the bad guys and you can act like you're morally superior. | ||
Like, is this all just a game? | ||
Is it all just because it's like once a scheme achieves its objective, then they give permission to people to tell the truth again because it's just too late at that point? | ||
I don't know. | ||
I don't know why, but I have a difficult time believing that the same people that defended Israel's actions over the last year and a half are suddenly outraged and shocked that they're starving people in Gaza. | ||
This doesn't make any sense to me. | ||
It doesn't make any sense to me. | ||
Let's go now to two more videos about Israel, I think. | ||
We'll go to 14 and 15. | ||
This is Anthony Aguilar, and he was a green beret who was actually stationed in Gaza and was assisting the IDF and was, of course, outraged and horrified at what he saw there. | ||
Here is a first-hand account of how the IDF is treating the Palestinian children that they're starving. | ||
Let's go to clip 14 now. | ||
And he put down the little food he has. | ||
You notice he doesn't have a box. | ||
He doesn't have a box of food. | ||
He has half of a bag of rice that he found on the ground, a broken bag, half a bag of lentils that he found on the ground. | ||
And he was thanking us. | ||
Thank you. | ||
This little boy from where he came from walked 12 kilometers to get there. | ||
Just to get there. | ||
12 kilometers. | ||
Look at this boy. | ||
And when he got there, he thanked us for the remnants and the small crumbs that he got. | ||
And he sets them down on the ground because I was kneeling at this point. | ||
And he sets his food down. | ||
And he places his hands on my face, on the side of my face, on my cheeks, these frail, skeleton, emaciated hands, dirty. | ||
And he puts them on my face and he kissed me. | ||
He kissed me and he said, thank you in English. | ||
Thank you. | ||
And he collected his items and he walked back to the group. | ||
And then he was shot at with pepper spray and tear gas and stun grenades and bullets shot at his feet in the air. | ||
And he runs away scared. | ||
And the IDF were shooting at the crowd. | ||
So they're shooting to control the population that's along the Moran corridor. | ||
And as they're doing that, they're shooting into this crowd, shooting into this crowd. | ||
And Palestinians, civilians, human beings are dropping to the ground, getting shot. | ||
And Amir was one of them. | ||
Amir walked 12 kilometers to get food, got nothing but scraps, thanked us for it, and died. | ||
I served in the army for 25 Years. | ||
I've been shot three times in combat. | ||
I'm pretty tough. | ||
This gets me every time because, to what you're saying, the dehumanization. | ||
And what I want to say to the American people and to the people of Israel: I've been there. | ||
I have touched them. | ||
I have talked to them. | ||
The civilians in Gaza that are getting the food, they are starving. | ||
They are not animals. | ||
They are human beings. | ||
And they're being treated like animals. | ||
We treat these civilians in Gaza worse with less dignity than we treated the ISIS fighters that surrendered in Baguz Fakhani in Syria in 2018. | ||
This young boy, this is on May, excuse me, May, May 28th on secure distribution site number two. | ||
The aid had been distributed. | ||
A lot of people had left. | ||
You see behind there's a crowd of people still with their boxes kind of getting ready to leave. | ||
And this little boy, his name is Amir, and he was standing, you know, he was with the crowd, but he walks over and you see that first picture on the top right. | ||
He kind of walks over to me and he puts out his hand. | ||
And at first I thought like that he that he wanted more food or something and I felt bad because I didn't have anything. | ||
But I was like, oh, I have nothing. | ||
And he puts out his hand. | ||
And so I beckoned him to come to me. | ||
I said, you know, come here. | ||
And he reaches out and he holds my hand and he kisses my hand. | ||
He kisses my hand and he says, Shukran. | ||
You can see in this picture that this little boy is not wearing shoes. | ||
His clothes are falling off of him because he's so skinny. | ||
I put my hand on his, on his left shoulder and I looked at him and he's looking at me. | ||
We're looking at each other in the eyes. | ||
And I say to him, people care. | ||
You're a human being and people care about you. | ||
The world cares. | ||
That's not Hamas. | ||
That's not a Hamas fighter. | ||
And I looked at him and I said, the world cares. | ||
Israel doesn't care. | ||
Israel doesn't care. | ||
And if that kid's allowed to grow up, would you blame him for wanting to join Hamas? | ||
I mean, my God, where are his parents? | ||
Where's the rest of his family? | ||
What did they think the outcome of this was going to be? | ||
I was going to be proud of Israel. | ||
And this is kind of the most disturbing thing out of all of it. | ||
We just showed the video of the woman talking about the IDF whistleblower saying 1,000 trucks of aid had been buried and destroyed rather than delivered to the Palestinians. | ||
And the woman's like, you know, the real consequence of this is Israel's reputation is being hurt. | ||
It's like, you aren't even pretending to care. | ||
You really don't even pretend that you actually care about the humanitarian crisis. | ||
It's literally just it's reputationally bad for Israel, and that's why you're against what's happening. | ||
And just like Smotrick said, it's moral to starve two million Gazans, but no one in the world would let us. | ||
It's not actually a rejection of the idea of starving children. | ||
It's they just don't think they could get away with it. | ||
If they thought they could get away with it, they would have done this a long time ago. | ||
So again, this is finally getting to the point of outrage, but don't worry. | ||
Don't worry, folks. | ||
The Israelis have it under control. | ||
Not that they're going to stop. | ||
I mean, they're not going to stop. | ||
And they're probably only going to get worse. | ||
In fact, that's what they're announcing, as you have Lindsey Graham saying, there's going to be a change in tactics by the Israeli military in Gaza. | ||
Yeah, they might nuke it or they might just take it over. | ||
Regardless, they're going to deliver a million Muslims to America. | ||
And maybe I should, I wasn't even going to go to this video, but clip number 18 is the foreign minister, I think, of Israel, basically blaming the Muslims in Europe for why Europe is turning against Israel now. | ||
We'll go to that clip. | ||
I wasn't going to go to it. | ||
Let's go to clip number 18 here. | ||
This is Israel saying they will not sacrifice their existence just to appease Europe. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
We are aware of the fact that there are countries in Europe today with a huge Muslim population. | ||
Sometimes it affects the policies of their governments. | ||
But this cannot and will not lead Israel to commit suicide. | ||
We won't allow a jihadist terror state in the heart of our ancient homeland. | ||
It ain't going to happen. | ||
We won't allow a Hamas terror state to form just a few kilometers away from our population centers. | ||
Israel will not be the Czechoslovakia of the 21st century. | ||
We won't sacrifice our own existence for the sake of the appeasement countries. | ||
We won't give up our basic interests for the sake of internal politics in certain countries that lost control over their own streets. | ||
But still, they are arrogantly presumed to decide for what's good for our security. | ||
They're going to have the arrogance to say what's good for our... | ||
Like, what is wrong with these people, man? | ||
It really is something else. | ||
And of course, it's the height of irony blaming the Muslim immigration to Europe. | ||
Why are there so many Muslims in Europe, Israel? | ||
What's that all about? | ||
Is there some sort of decade-long civil war in Syria that you started that drove all of the Muslims into Europe? | ||
Was it the Israeli immigration services that are running boats from Libya to Italy back and forth on a daily basis? | ||
Have I not seen videos of Israeli volunteers welcoming dinghies full of migrants on the shores of Greek beaches? | ||
And are you not at this very moment making plans to transport 2 million Muslims from Gaza into Europe? | ||
So it's just insane. | ||
It just is completely insane. | ||
And of course, they expect Europe to kill itself for the sake of Israel. | ||
Just don't you dare suggest it be the other way around. | ||
So again, they're panicking because they're losing the information war, they're losing the PR war, and they cannot survive without the assistance and being propped up entirely by the entire Western political sphere. | ||
Let's go to clip number 20 here, as this is the source of all of their panic. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
You know, Benjamin Netanyahu, if you look at polling in the United States, he is lost in the court of public opinion. | ||
I want you to take a look here at his net favorable rating. | ||
It is the lowest on record, according to Gallup, and they have records going all the way back since the 1990s. | ||
What are we talking about here? | ||
Well, in April of 2019, before, obviously, Israel in Gaza in the latest war that's been going on for a long time, Benjamin Nanyahu was on the positive side at plus 13 points. | ||
Look at where he is today, minus 23 points. | ||
My goodness gracious. | ||
You look at those under the age of 35. | ||
His net favorable rating at this point, get this, 53 points underwater. | ||
My God. | ||
And this, of course, has everything to do with Israel's actions in Gaza. | ||
The American people at this particular point not exactly liking what they're seeing. | ||
And they believe that Benjamin Netanyahu is in large part responsible. | ||
unidentified
|
So to that point, how do Americans feel about Israel's actions in Gaza right now? | |
Yeah, so let's take a look at this. | ||
I mean, net approval, Israel's military acts in Gaza. | ||
You go back to November of 2023. | ||
It's on the positive side of the ledger, plus five points. | ||
I bet if you even go back a little bit further, it'd be a little bit higher, but Gallup only measured in November of 2023 at plus five points. | ||
Look at here where we are in July of 2025. | ||
Way down there at minus 28 points. | ||
Among those under the age of 35, get this, a negative 73-point net approval rating. | ||
This is all being led. | ||
All the negative opinions towards Israel and their acts in Gaza are being led by the younger folks in the electorate. | ||
Negative 73 points on the net approval rating. | ||
You rarely ever see numbers that low, and that is charging up this number, 28 points underwater. | ||
The net approval rating of Israel's military acts in Gaza. | ||
The American people do not like what they're seeing and increasingly dislike what they're seeing. | ||
unidentified
|
That is really a shift. | |
And this is leading, too, to a number of other feelings when it comes to Israel in general. | ||
I mean, as we look at that, and also questions about Palestinians and whether to recognize the state of Palestine, that's back in the news because of Emmanuel Macron. | ||
Where do we stand on some of those questions? | ||
Yeah, so for the longest period of time, Americans have sympathized more with the Israelis than the Palestinians. | ||
That's still the case, but it's only by plus five. | ||
You go back to May of 2024, it was plus 17. | ||
Right after October 7th, look at this, it was plus 48. | ||
In 2017, it was plus 39 points. | ||
That is a dramatic drop. | ||
That is, what is that, a 43-point drop since the aftermath of October 7th? | ||
And again, under the age of 50, you look at those younger voters, it was plus 38 Israelis back all the way back in 2017. | ||
You look now, it is plus 19 Palestinians. | ||
There has simply put been a complete change of opinion on this topic, and it has been at least driven in large part by how Americans view the military actions of Israel in Gaza. | ||
unidentified
|
It's fascinating to see those numbers, Harry. | |
I appreciate it. | ||
Thank you. | ||
Just 23% of Americans say Gaza military actions in Gaza, or Israel military actions in Gaza are fully justified, CNN poll finds. | ||
So they're losing the information war, so they're really pulling out all the stops. | ||
That means that they're, and I talked about this on American Journal, they're doing this thing where they are inviting hundreds of content creators to Israel, right-wing content creators, but they're all under 30 because they understand they've got to win back over the young people. | ||
And the young people don't exactly love genocide, so they have to trick them. | ||
So now they have to trick them even harder. | ||
Yeah, and that's why, you know, Netanyahu's going on the Folson podcast with his scripted questions to lie to them. | ||
I mean, it's just insane. | ||
And we'll finish here on Israel in particular, but here's just two more stories about just how awful they are. | ||
Israel settlers terrorized Christian villages of Tebe in the West Bank, setting vehicles ablaze, hurling stones at homes, and riding threatening graffiti. | ||
Christians have experienced daily aggression from Jewish settlers, while Israel's government has done nothing to stop the violence. | ||
In fact, they support it, and American taxpayers are responsible for paying for this. | ||
Tonight, Israel settler families are awaiting at the Allen B Crossing, West Bank, to block humanitarian aid trucks intended for Gaza. | ||
At the same time, a bus with settlers entered the village of Alwarta, West Bank, with the aim to steal Palestinian homes. | ||
So they really got all their bases covered here. | ||
And of course, the Israeli government doing absolutely nothing to stop these settlers' activities. | ||
But the reason it's important to harp on this, again, I'm not, my thing is not being anti-Israel. | ||
I'm pro-America. | ||
And Israel is sort of at the heart of all of these conflicts that we've been talking about for the recent past. | ||
Obviously, it's at the heart of the Epstein saga, Gillene Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein being Mossad agents and running a honeypot operation, which, you know, at least is in part why America is so beholden to Israel, because our politicians are pretty much all complete pedophiles, or at least being blackmailed by the pedophiles in some way. | ||
As well as any other topic you want to get into, whether it's the violence breaking out from the pro-Palestinian side, killing people, or the censorship that's going on, and we'll get very into that here in just a second. | ||
But we'll go to a final clip here. | ||
Clip number eight. | ||
Most important question you can ever learn to ask is who benefits? | ||
And this is in line with APAC dropping Randy Fine, big fat Randy Fine for saying that he wanted Gaussins to starve. | ||
But here's a little insight into APAC. | ||
Clip number eight. | ||
I believe this is from Glenn Beck's show. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
I've actually studied APAC, and it's like, well, everyone in Congress and the Senate, they're hijacked and they're under the control of AIPAC because they have the money. | ||
It's true. | ||
But if you look at APAC's money, they get it from the American Israeli Education Fund. | ||
And if you look at who's putting money into that, it's Raytheon, it's Boeing. | ||
It's military-industrial complex. | ||
This is what Eisenhower warned us for. | ||
He didn't warn us for the Zionist-Israeli-Jew industrial complex. | ||
He warned us for the military-industrial complex. | ||
So if you got war somewhere, look at who really benefits from that. | ||
It's just a big coincidence that the military-industrial complex is peopled entirely by hardcore Zionist Jews. | ||
That's not what we should be focusing on. | ||
But he's got a point there. | ||
And, you know, it's not just getting money from Raytheon. | ||
And, of course, you get how this works, right? | ||
The American taxpayers pay for weapons that are given to Israel. | ||
Then the money that Raytheon makes then goes into the ADL and APAC, who then advocate for more weapons to be sent to Israel. | ||
And that gives them more money. | ||
So it's a cycle that they're operating, that they're making a ton of money on. | ||
But it's not just that. | ||
It's all the other NGOs that get government money that then get poured into lobbying efforts to further restrict or constrict or manipulate public opinion and government policy that way. | ||
So it's a giant enclosed ecosystem that they have robbing the American people for the benefit of Israel. | ||
And APAC is a key component in that. | ||
But so are so many of these other programs or operations or organizations. | ||
Boy, back on the other side, talk about the way censorship is the newest weapon in the information war that Israel is really maximizing their use of. | ||
They're going nuclear. | ||
All right, folks, welcome back. | ||
Welcome back. | ||
We're going to go into censorship here. | ||
Let's go into censorship and ties into what we're talking about with Israel. | ||
Before we do that, let me remind you that we are supported entirely by thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Thealexjonesstore.com is where you can find just all the incredible supplements, the Shilajit, the Irish Sea Moss, the new products we come out with almost on a weekly basis. | ||
The AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
All the products are amazing. | ||
We use them here at the office. | ||
We're constantly running out and stealing them from each other. | ||
Could actually be an entire reality show. | ||
The drama that goes on behind the scenes of people, where's my methylene blue? | ||
You see Chase. | ||
You see Chase when he doesn't get his supplements. | ||
It gets bad, folks. | ||
But honestly, we don't sell you things that we don't believe in. | ||
We don't tell you things that we don't believe. | ||
And if I haven't tried a product yet, I'll tell you, I haven't tried this yet, but it looks good. | ||
You should try it out. | ||
But most of the products I do like, Shilajit Complex, I love. | ||
The Ultimate Seamos Gummies, I love. | ||
I really have to stop myself from eating too much of them, but I like them as a little pick-me-up in the afternoon. | ||
And right now it's a buy one, get one. | ||
Bombshell sale on the methylene blue tincture. | ||
The Shilajit gummies and the Irish Sea Moss Gummies. | ||
Again, these products are pretty much like mythical. | ||
Like it's just absolutely insane how these compounds come to be. | ||
Shilajit literally just emerges out of the ground at the top of the Altai Mountains, and it's just a superfood that people have used for thousands of years. | ||
We simply clean it up, purify it, remove any heavy metals, since there could be when it's naturally harvested, and put it in gummy form. | ||
Same thing with Irish sea moss. | ||
It just washes up on the beach, and it's like the best, most powerful superfood you could ever imagine. | ||
And actually kept a lot of people alive during the Irish famine. | ||
That's how they learned about sea moss's power is that people were so hungry, they're like, shoot, let's eat the sea moss. | ||
And it turned out to be an incredible superfood. | ||
So again, we just take that natural gift from God, package it up nicely, and sell it to you so you can feel the effects. | ||
And they are powerful and they are beneficial. | ||
And you can get them now for buy one, get one at thealxjonstore.com. | ||
Please do. | ||
It keeps us on the air and in the fight, which is more important now than ever as we talk about the upcoming advancement of censorship, which is happening worldwide in a variety of different ways. | ||
But one of the ways that relates back to our previous topic, TikTok hires ex-Israeli military associate to censor anti-Zionist content. | ||
So of course, we know, and this is another example of Israeli control of America and just how deep it is. | ||
You have to understand that Israel controls our Congress more than the president. | ||
Just understand that. | ||
If there's anything Republicans want, you're going to have the entire Democratic Party doing everything they can to stop it, even or perhaps especially when it's something that would be beneficial to the American people. | ||
Democrats are never going to go for it, even if it's just not to give Republicans a win, right? | ||
But if Israel wants something, everybody's on board. | ||
Everybody on both sides of the aisle gets instruction from their APAC handler, and they all vote in the same way. | ||
So when it came to TikTok, this is like not even a speculative thing. | ||
You can actually point to it and go, hey, during Trump's first administration, he tried to get TikTok banned and nobody would go for it. | ||
And the Democrats stopped it and it just didn't go anywhere, sort of died on the vine. | ||
But he wanted to get rid of TikTok or, you know, somehow take ownership of TikTok. | ||
And his first administration didn't happen, couldn't happen. | ||
It was ridiculous, free speech, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
Then Israel wants TikTok banned. | ||
And in like two weeks, it's banned. | ||
The law is passed and TikTok is facing the guillotine for all intents and purposes. | ||
So obviously, this is part of that, right? | ||
This is part of the, hey, the, we, you know, Israel got the American Congress to vote to censor TikTok because of anti-Semitism. | ||
And again, it's one of these things, we've been talking about it on an American Journal. | ||
They call it Trump's Law. | ||
Trump's Law is that anything Trump does is for Israel, good or bad, you can always relay it back to Israel. | ||
And they're pretty blatant about this. | ||
They always have just like the bare minimum like disguise to cover up what they're doing, but then they always admit it at the end of the day, right? | ||
UNESCO was the example I was just using, where if you read the official statement, it's like, well, UNESCO was doing some shady stuff with the communist Chinese, and UNESCO is woke, and we don't like wokeness. | ||
And UNESCO did something else. | ||
And maybe they'll mention. | ||
And also, Gaza, it's full of anti-Semites. | ||
But it's all these other reasons, just like TikTok or just like the way they're going after the president of Harvard and claimed it was about DEI or plagiarism. | ||
It's just not. | ||
It's just not. | ||
And in all of these cases, you eventually get the person, like the spokesperson for Trump the other day was like, oh, UNESCO? | ||
Yeah, it's because they're anti-Semites. | ||
It's because to help Israel, we got rid of them. | ||
So it's like anything that happens is because of Israel. | ||
Now, TikTok, they're like, oh, it's Chinese-owned. | ||
It's privacy. | ||
And then at the end of the day, they're like, well, no, it's because it's not controlled. | ||
It's because they don't have an anti-Semitism monitor there, you know, making sure everything comports to the lies of Israel. | ||
And so obviously, I can only imagine that this was part of the negotiations where they said, look, TikTok, we're going to destroy you because of all the hate speech that you're spreading, all the anti-Semitism. | ||
So in order to avoid being destroyed, you have to have an IDF member there to censor content. | ||
TikTok recently hired a new hate speech manager with longstanding ties to the Jewish community, the company confirmed to Jewish Insider. | ||
As the social media platform faces growing pressure to confront a sharp rise in anti-Semitic content, the streaming platform enlisted Erica Mindel, a former State Department contractor who worked for Ambassador Deborah Lipstadt, the Biden administration's special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism, to join TikTok's global public policy and government affairs team. | ||
So, you know, on one hand, this does everything to confirm the statements of the anti-Semites, right? | ||
That Israel or the Jews control, you know, messaging and they have this worldwide censorship regime. | ||
This contributes to that. | ||
But obviously, they've run the equation and decided, well, being able to censor people is worth confirming the claims of the anti-Semites because obviously, again, you've got the American Jewish Committee working with the ADL to force TikTok to establish this new role specifically focused on stopping anti-Semitism. | ||
And this, of course, had to be forced on TikTok because they didn't do it willingly. | ||
The other social media companies, very willing to do this and didn't need to have their arm twisted whatsoever. | ||
We can go first to clip number 10 here. | ||
This is ex-IDF instructor, Erica Mindel, previously served as Assistant Director of Program Development at the American Jewish Committee. | ||
According to a LinkedIn profile, worked briefly as the Special Envoy's Office in the second Trump administration before she was hired by TikTok, the company told Jewish Insider. | ||
Here's Erica Mindel in her profile of the Faces of American Jewry. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
Faces of American Jewry from the American Jewish Congress, Virtual Global Forum 2021. | ||
My name is Erica Mendel, and I work for Project Interchange at American Jewish Committee. | ||
I grew up in a traditional conservative household. | ||
I went to a traditional Jewish day school, a traditional conservative summer camp, and like many other American Jews, I took a gap year before college and spent 10 months living in Israel, where I participated in a program that was centered around exploring and understanding Jewry worldwide. | ||
My sophomore year at the University of Michigan, a BDS resolution was presented to the student government. | ||
Like many other committed American Jews I knew on campus, I decided to get involved in combating it. | ||
I committed myself wholeheartedly to engaging with student leaders on the topic of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. | ||
Our conversations quickly became a microcosm of a century-long conflict happening on the other side of the world. | ||
For the first time, I pushed myself out of my comfort zone, encountering and internalizing new perspectives and forcing myself to consider a variety of viewpoints and narratives. | ||
In the summer of 2014, after my sophomore year, like many of my friends, I had a summer internship, a Goleman Fellowship at AJC. | ||
I came to work each morning as Israel engaged in one of the larger military operations of my lifetime, Sukhetan, Operation Protective Edge. | ||
That summer, I realized how impactful my Jewish upbringing and education was. | ||
I simultaneously realized how passionate my own Zionist identity had become. | ||
I knew the well-being of Jews worldwide and the security of Israel would be issues of lifelong importance to me. | ||
I grew up in a traditional Jewish household, but in an untraditional decision, after graduating from Michigan, I made aliyah and enlisted in the Israel Defense Forces. | ||
I spent the next two years serving as a madrichat shirion, an instructor in the Armored Corps. | ||
To many, this might seem like a contradiction. | ||
For a woman who identifies as liberal and progressive to be a Zionist so committed as to join the IDF, these two identities go hand in hand. | ||
Oh, do they? | ||
My American, Israeli, Jewish, progressive identity is complex and it's full of rich Jewish values. | ||
It is my own, but connected to my parents', grandparents', and great-grandparents' experiences. | ||
My identity was shaped by my upbringing, but cemented by my life experiences and my own decisions. | ||
All right, so she can shut up now. | ||
So there is the committed hardcore Zionist that's now in charge of what you're allowed to say about Israel on TikTok. | ||
Thanks. | ||
Thanks, gigantic worldwide cabal of Jews working to get this done. | ||
Well done. | ||
Total accomplishment. | ||
Great. | ||
It's great stuff. | ||
Again, it's like isn't new. | ||
By the way, isn't new. | ||
It's new for TikTok, I guess. | ||
Apparently, they've been forced into this because of Jewish control of the American Congress and the way they use America like a giant swinging club to achieve their ends. | ||
Do you know that when Iceland wanted to ban circumcision, it was an American senator who sent them a letter basically saying America will destroy Ireland or destroy Iceland unless you allow circumcision? | ||
By the way, there were like literally zero Jewish people in Iceland, but it didn't matter. | ||
The Jewish congressman was happy to wield the strength and force of America to force Iceland to abandon its desire to abolish male genital mutilation. | ||
So, whatever. | ||
America is just their wrecking ball, their baseball bat that they take to the head of their enemies. | ||
And I guess we're happy to serve that role. | ||
Remember, it was in January of 2021, just after January 6th, that Donald Trump was kicked off of every social media platform, in part because they wanted to lie about what he was saying. | ||
They wanted to write stories about how he was encouraging people at the Capitol when in reality, and if you went to his social media, you saw videos of him telling everybody to go home and to calm down and to disperse. | ||
So, you know, they removed him from that. | ||
Now, the person who removed him at Facebook, the organization was the oversight board. | ||
Now, that oversight board at the time, the chairwoman was the former justice minister for Israel. | ||
So we literally have Israeli government ministers, IDF, you know, soldiers like that woman we just saw with positions of authority up to the ability to kick the sitting U.S. president off of Facebook, this choice being made by a government official of the state of Israel. | ||
So this is outrageous to me. | ||
And why we allow, as Americans, our free speech to be curtailed, censored, and eliminated by Israelis for their own benefit is infuriating and unsustainable. | ||
Of course, this is new for TikTok. | ||
Facebook's already had this well in hand. | ||
Let's go to clip number seven here. | ||
This is Jordana Cutler speaking at Jewish News Syndicate, I believe it's called, talking about how she now works at Meta, very similar to TikTok. | ||
They created a position just for her to defend Jews online, I guess, to stop anti-Semitism, which, of course, as we know, from the new adopted definition of the IHRA, the International Holocaust Remembrance Association, says that any criticism of Israel or Jews, crimes, real or imagined, it's all anti-Semitism. | ||
Shut up. | ||
Nothing but positivity when it comes to Israel. | ||
And Jordana Cutler is there at Meta to make sure that your posts comply to her ideology. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
In addition to my work leading the Israel public policy team, I created a new role specifically focused on the Jewish diaspora. | ||
It is a privilege to represent Meta to Jewish communities worldwide. | ||
I am proud that META's commitment to addressing anti-Semitism on our platforms has remained steadfast, especially after October 7th. | ||
Our policies are industry-leading in protecting Jewish people and Israelis on our platforms. | ||
Our community standards include policies that prevent harassment, violence, and incitement, and include a robust framework to combat anti-Semitism. | ||
Our hateful conduct policy includes specific protections for Israelis and Jews. | ||
We banned Holocaust denial and distortion back in 2020. | ||
We changed industry thinking on this issue, designating denial as hate speech rather than misinformation. | ||
It wasn't just about facts. | ||
It was about protecting people from harmful conduct. | ||
We banned content with harmful stereotypes about Jews, such as the claim that Jews run the world or other major institutions. | ||
We updated our policies to recognize that the term Zionist can be used as a proxy for Jews and Israelis. | ||
We banned content claiming Zionists run the world or control the media. | ||
Oh, really? | ||
We do not allow for dehumanizing comparisons of Zionists. | ||
We banned a delicate balance between. | ||
Wait a second. | ||
Wait a second. | ||
You ban people for saying that Zionists control the media. | ||
You don't see any sort of contradiction there. | ||
They just said that with no irony. | ||
No irony whatsoever. | ||
She's standing in front of the Jewish news syndicate, bragging about how she's been given a new position in Meta to specifically advocate and censor on behalf of the Jewish global community. | ||
But don't you dare say there's a Jewish global community in operation. | ||
Don't you dare say that Zionists control the media, she says, as she stands in front of a giant media collaboration bragging about controlling it. | ||
Okay. | ||
Okay, great. | ||
Thanks, guys. | ||
I think we get it. | ||
I think we're understanding now what the deal is. | ||
Again, this goes hand in hand with all of the anti-Semitism laws being passed now, the anti-Semitism monitors being put in every single governmental program. | ||
And obviously, it's sort of the perfect situation where if you call out their censorship, they claim that that's justifiable censorship, right? | ||
So if you talk about the Jews controlling the media, they'll say that's anti-Semitism and we'll kick you out of the media. | ||
It's like the old weekly update joke from Norm McDonald, where he says Marlon Brando said he apologized for saying the Jews control Hollywood. | ||
And in return, the Jews said he's welcome to work again. | ||
It's kind of like that. | ||
Or like what happened with Kanye West, where he's like, yeah, the Jews will destroy you for speaking out against him. | ||
And they're like, too bad your Adidas deal just went away and we're going to steal billions of dollars from you. | ||
It's just confirming what people are saying. | ||
But obviously, it's more important and it's better to have the content suppressed and to have the person there to censor information. | ||
You know, that's worth it, even if it exposes the control that you have and the reality behind the claims of the people you're claiming are lying and hateful. | ||
So, you know, good for them, I guess. | ||
Good for them, I guess. | ||
They're not, you know, the only force trying to silence everybody these days. | ||
But you understand that it's not anti-Semitism to be against this. | ||
And it's actually kind of impossible to even imagine any other group with this level of control, this level of censorship. | ||
But you could imagine it. | ||
You could imagine if Catholics in this country had a Catholic monitor. | ||
I mean, it's an Inquisition. | ||
It's the Jewish Inquisition, right? | ||
If you had a Catholic person there standing in front of the Catholic news syndicate going, I have a position in Meta to make sure that no anti-Catholic or anti-Christian sentiment is allowed. | ||
Would we stand for that? | ||
Would you stand for that? | ||
You go, well, that's fine. | ||
I'm not anti-Catholic, so I don't have anything to say about that. | ||
I mean, that's good. | ||
They're just protecting themselves. | ||
Hate speech. | ||
No. | ||
You'd go, this is ridiculous. | ||
You'd say this is ridiculous, and this is a blatant, obvious, powerful example, well, a powerful violation of the right to freedom of religion in this country. | ||
There should not be a religion that has the power that Judaism has in this country. | ||
We're supposed to not have that. | ||
That's actually the whole point of the First Amendment, is that the very same restrictions that the government is under that allow Jews to worship in this country are the same ones that should stop people from implementing anti-Semitism monitoring on your social media. | ||
So it's infuriating has nothing to do with liking or disliking Jews. | ||
It's liking or disliking having the freedom of speech and having the ability to criticize a group of people, any group of people, or any religion, or any set of thoughts, or any foreign country for that matter. | ||
We have an absolute right in this country to speak our mind. | ||
As long as we're not calling for imminent violence, you should be allowed to say it. | ||
And that's not just a sentiment that we want people to believe. | ||
It is a foundational, crucial aspect of our spirit as a nation. | ||
And the companies that violate this, I think the government should step in and stop that from happening, especially when you have literal foreign government ministers in Facebook silencing our president. | ||
And that was four years ago. | ||
And ever since then, they've only increased their influence. | ||
It's unacceptable. | ||
It's wrong. | ||
It has to stop. | ||
It absolutely has to stop. | ||
But that's just not even the biggest thing in censorship these days. | ||
What's happening with the UK online censorship bill is absolutely massive and horrifying and obvious that, and it's almost like they're not even trying anymore. | ||
And it's been this way for a little while. | ||
And again, I struggle to even just like, it's not, it's not even that they would try to like deceive us in the way that they do, but it's that they can get away with it. | ||
I don't know if I'm explaining this well. | ||
But it's like, I understand that they will do things like they'll say this is a bill about saving babies. | ||
And then really inside the bill, there's like, you know, pork a bunch of money for some, you know, project in some congressional district. | ||
I get that, right? | ||
You want to label your bill something good and nice to trick people into voting for it. | ||
And really you have all these ulterior motives. | ||
I get that. | ||
What I don't understand is when they're like, we passed the biggest green energy bill ever. | ||
It was called the Inflation Reduction Act. | ||
And you're just like, wait, what? | ||
Wait, what? | ||
Like, yeah, it's the Inflation Reduction Act, and it has everything to do with climate change. | ||
It's like, what? | ||
Why are you telling us that? | ||
Why aren't you actually even trying to hide it? | ||
So with this censorship bill, the online censorship act, they're just like doing the bare minimum, just the lightest facade where they're like, this is about children, keeping children away from graphic information, but actually we're censoring all of the anti-migrant sentiment. | ||
No, but it's about children. | ||
It's about keeping them away from pornography. | ||
It's about safety. | ||
Don't you love safety? | ||
But actually, we're just going to throw anybody in jail that opposes the policies of the government that directly affect their lives. | ||
But it's about kids, you guys. | ||
So it's this like brazenness where they just are blatantly censoring you, just like they're, just like Israel's blatantly starving children, and they just lie to your face about it. | ||
And nobody can recognize that. | ||
Nobody sees this. | ||
Nobody like points out the obvious lie. | ||
And it's right in all of our faces. | ||
I don't, it's, I don't get it. | ||
I don't get it. | ||
It's weird. | ||
And again, it's not weird that they would lie, but it's weird that they know they can lie and get away with it because no one's going to say anything about it. | ||
And honestly, I mean, this stack is just completely insane. | ||
Counselor reported to police. | ||
This is a town councillor, right? | ||
This is like a low-level bureaucrat elected by his constituency in England. | ||
A counselor was reported to police for asking questions about migrants in a hotel. | ||
John Edwards of Sandhurst Town Council questioned in April why 300 Afghans had been housed at a hotel in Blacknell, Berkshire, when, quote, many of our veterans remain homeless. | ||
It has since emerged that they were brought to Britain after a list of names of Afghans who had applied to come to the UK was leaked. | ||
Of course, we learned that there are a lot of Taliban fighters in there. | ||
But then he was actually reported to the police for stirring up hate with far-right propaganda about the hotel. | ||
Stirring up racial hatred. | ||
So a town councillor in the UK says, why are we paying for 300 Afghans when we have veterans who are living on the street? | ||
If this money is available, why doesn't it go to our homeless before the Afghanistan homeless? | ||
And for that, he's reported to the police and may face charges under racial hatred, stirring racial hatred. | ||
And that, again, is just like the bare minimum, the very beginning. | ||
We'll get into a hell of a lot more on the other side about how the UK Online Safety Act is not only destroying free speech Europe-wide, not just in the UK, but how the exact same thing is happening in Australia. | ||
The exact same thing is happening in Ireland. | ||
The exact same thing is coming to America if we don't stop it. | ||
And again, we can thank our lucky stars and we can say thanks to God that the founding fathers had the foresight to put the First Amendment first, but that is no guarantee, folks. | ||
Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroyer today. | ||
Final hour is on here on the war room. | ||
And I got more video. | ||
I'm just going to play videos this whole time because I got so much to show you. | ||
It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
We're going to keep talking about censorship and the UK Online Safety Act. | ||
The Online Safety Act, you know, it's about kids. | ||
It's about keeping kids away from graphic material. | ||
In fact, yesterday, when they were asked about it during the joint press conference between Keir Starmer and Donald Trump, Keir Starmer said it's not just about protecting children's innocence from seeing things like pornography. | ||
The real crucial point of it is to stop kids from accessing suicide sites. | ||
He said there's a suicide epidemic. | ||
So they're taking the transgender tack of, if you're against this, it's because you want children to kill themselves. | ||
Okay. | ||
Okay, sure. | ||
We'll destroy that argument here in just a second. | ||
But this is part of the UK's online safety bill, Safety Act. | ||
It bans all criticism of illegal immigration. | ||
The kinds of illegal content and activity that platforms need to protect users from are set out in the Act, and this includes content related to controlling your coercive behavior, child sexual abuse, extreme sexual violence, extreme pornography, fraud, racial or religiously aggravated public order offenses, inciting violence, illegal immigration, and people smuggling. | ||
Content related to illegal immigration and people smuggling. | ||
Okay, so the government will plant a million Afghans in your backyard, and you cannot be against it. | ||
That's all that that means. | ||
It means that democracy is a lie in Europe, as if we needed another example of that. | ||
So far, I think upwards of 400,000, possibly up to a million people, have signed a petition to stop the online censorship safety act. | ||
But it doesn't matter. | ||
It doesn't matter if your whole country's against it. | ||
It's happening to you anyway. | ||
Just like immigration. | ||
How many times has Britain voted to allow in immigrants? | ||
As far as I can tell, they got about one chance to make themselves known. | ||
It was the plebiscite about Brexit. | ||
Everybody knows Brexit was all about immigration. | ||
They made economic arguments and there were whatever, different arguments flying around. | ||
But at the end of the day, everybody recognized Brexit was about immigration and it was about removing the UK from the requirements of the EU to take in an infinite number of immigrants. | ||
So the only time that the British people have actually had an opportunity to vote on whether or not to have more immigrants, they all universally say no. | ||
Even if the bill is, it's like totally unlikely that it would happen and the whole media is against it. | ||
The British people don't want immigration. | ||
It doesn't matter. | ||
They get it anyway. | ||
They don't want censorship. | ||
It doesn't matter. | ||
You're getting it anyway. | ||
I don't know what else they need to do. | ||
And we talked about it all yesterday. | ||
We spent like over an hour on American Journal just breaking down the Sovietization of the UK. | ||
But in just very simple, uncomplicated terms, it's not hard to understand. | ||
They inflict things on you and then they don't let you talk about it. | ||
That's it. | ||
It's just about control. | ||
It's just about facilitating policies that they know are unpopular because they're not democratic in the slightest. | ||
They aren't actually concerned with your well-being. | ||
They're actually destroying you. | ||
And if you knew that and were able to speak up about it and spread the word about it and get more people on board with stopping it, then they wouldn't be able to destroy you. | ||
So they want to keep being able to destroy you. | ||
So you need to shut up about it. | ||
UK government admits using Online Safety Act to monitor anti-immigration opinions. | ||
No, they literally created an elite task force of police officers to monitor social media for anti-immigrant sentiment. | ||
Okay, not calling for violence, not spreading misinformation, not anything that you could even ostensibly categorize as illegal language. | ||
Just sentiment. | ||
Just if you don't, if you aren't absolutely in favor of your outright destruction, then you'll be on the wrong side of the law. | ||
And you may go to jail for a couple years. | ||
We'll show you that on the other side. | ||
And this happens a lot. | ||
And remember, this is one year out from the Southport riots in which dozens of British patriots were arrested while they simultaneously let out thousands of violent criminals because of overcrowding in their jails. | ||
It's as absurd as it sounds, and it only gets worse. | ||
Stay with us. | ||
Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer on this, the 29th of July, 2025. | ||
Final hour of the war room is on. | ||
Thanks so much for being here with us. | ||
The censorship is only ramping up. | ||
And yeah, you also have to understand when we talk about the global conspiracy, and it really is the conspiracy. | ||
It's tempting to break it down into constituent conspiracies, but it's all really one big conspiracy, and it's about globalism. | ||
It's about destroying national strength. | ||
It's about eliminating demographic blocks that could pose a threat to the system. | ||
Remember, they'll pitch globalism as an end to war because they want to eliminate nation states fighting against each other for a delineated period of time, for a period of time until an objective is achieved or peace is declared. | ||
Instead, it will be endless war against anybody not in their system. | ||
So, again, as we talk about things like Gaza, just understand that's the practice ground. | ||
That's the testing phase for implementation everywhere. | ||
So, again, when you look at what's going on between Israel and Gaza, don't for a single second think that you're on the side of the Israelis. | ||
You're not. | ||
You're not, unless you're Israeli, okay? | ||
So I hope everybody realizes that. | ||
Now, the UK's Online Safety Act, because, you know, expressing yourself is just so unsafe. | ||
Being against the government, it's a very dangerous thing to do, I guess, is obviously and Immediately, and as far as I can tell, exclusively being used to silence people's opposition to immigration. | ||
Which is bizarre because even Kirstarmer and others are admitting that the immigration levels are completely unsustainable. | ||
But obviously, there are ways around these restrictions for now, but they're talking about getting rid of these. | ||
TechRadar.com reports, could VPNs be banned? | ||
UK government to look very closely into their usage amid mass usage since the age of verification row. | ||
UK science secretary ensures there's no plans to ban VPNs. | ||
The government is, however, looking very closely at how VPNs are being used. | ||
VPN demand soared in the UK starting from Friday, July 25th, 2025, as Brits look for ways to avoid new age checks. | ||
So call me crazy. | ||
I don't think a lot of children are using VPNs. | ||
I think if this had anything to do with children, VPNs probably wouldn't be that big of a concern. | ||
Why is there such a rise in demand for VPNs in the UK? | ||
It ain't because a bunch of kids are trying to watch inappropriate material. | ||
It's because this online censorship act has absolutely nothing to do with children and is instead being used to censor adults from expressing themselves. | ||
It's really not that complicated. | ||
Okay. | ||
So again, they're like, this is all about children. | ||
But it's not, though, but it's obviously not. | ||
But this would be implemented in a hundred different ways if this was about children. | ||
It very clearly isn't. | ||
It's just that's the excuse they're using. | ||
Again, and this just works. | ||
I wish it didn't, but apparently it does. | ||
You just say it's for children's safety, and then you get to censor everybody. | ||
And if anybody says, hey, you're censoring us, you say, what do you want children to kill themselves? | ||
I can't believe you. | ||
How heartless you are. | ||
Again, it shouldn't work. | ||
Reasonably, with human beings having an IQ averaging about above 50 or so, it shouldn't be possible to pull off. | ||
But they keep doing it. | ||
And they're doing it everywhere. | ||
Face, age, and ID checks using the internet in Australia is about to fundamentally change. | ||
The Albanese government trumpeted the passage of its legislation banning under 16s from social media, which will come into effect in December. | ||
But new industry codes developed by the tech sector and eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant under the Online Safety Act will probably have much larger ramifications for how Australians access the internet. | ||
Measures to be deployed by online services could include looking at your account history or using facial age assurance and bank card checks. | ||
Identity checks using IDs such as driver's licenses to keep children under 16 off social media will also apply to logged in accounts for search engines from December under industry code that came into force at the end of June. | ||
So again, it's not just the UK. | ||
This is a global push for censorship in the same way you saw the global push for lockdowns during COVIDs or anything else. | ||
And when it comes to the UK, there's a particularly kind of absurd way that they're rolling this out. | ||
And again, it's okay. | ||
The number of things wrong with this. | ||
It's like, it's obviously being used to censor political discussion, which has an effect whether you like it or not, right? | ||
It's not like, well, we can just get a VPN or we can just... | ||
When you're censoring something, it is going to drastically alter the ability of the average person to know what's going on. | ||
It affects their perspective of world events and therefore affects the way they vote. | ||
I mean, it's a major thing for them to do. | ||
But it also allows them to do things like get access to your personal messages and your private messages, your ostensibly private messages. | ||
And again, all of this is in line with the way the globalists work. | ||
You get corporations to circumvent restrictions your government is under, right? | ||
Congress or whatever, the Fed in America is not allowed to search your papers or your correspondence or your communication without a warrant, unless it's in the hands and technically under the ownership of a big tech company who has an agreement with the government to say, we will supply you with information even without a warrant. | ||
In which case, they don't have to abide by the Fifth Amendment. | ||
They don't have to abide by the strictures of the Constitution because the corporation is able to circumvent it, is able to get around it and render it useless. | ||
And so they're doing that with the new and more advanced censorship activities they're involved in now. | ||
Again, everywhere all at once. | ||
The Gardais, the Federal Police of Ireland, are getting powers to monitor WhatsApp chats. | ||
Currently, Gardais cannot get warrants to tap messages on encrypted platforms. | ||
This is set to change. | ||
The Gardais could soon be able to intercept and monitor live conversations on private messaging apps, including WhatsApp, iMessage, and Instagram, under new surveillance laws being introduced by the government. | ||
Justice Minister Jim O'Callaghan is preparing to bring forward legislation that could give Garde, the Defense Forces, and the Garde Omsbudsmen the ability to track messages involving those linked to potential criminal activity. | ||
And instead of intervening or intercepting the encrypted chats, they're actually going to be able to surveil you as you're writing the message. | ||
So even before the message is sent, they'll be able to monitor your thoughts. | ||
Judges overseeing warrant use have previously described the current legal framework as deficient in urgently requiring monetization, while privacy advocates argue the system lacks transparency and safeguards. | ||
And essentially, they'll be able to monitor you in real time. | ||
And in fact, I wasn't even going to relate it to this, but I did have this other story that I wanted to read the headline just because of how absurd it is. | ||
This is from July 22nd, so just about a few days ago. | ||
Brave browser blocks Windows feature that takes screenshots of everything you do on your PC. | ||
It's one of these headlines where it's like, it blocks what? | ||
I'm sorry, there's a what feature on Windows? | ||
It does what to everything I do on my PC? | ||
It's like, no, well, Brave is blocking it. | ||
Yeah, what are they blocking? | ||
They're blocking a program called Windows Recall on its Co-Pilot Plus PCs. | ||
If there's anything that Microsoft Build 2024 will be remembered for, it's the introduction of the controversial Windows Recall on its co-pilot PCs. | ||
Pitched as a photographic memory for your computer, this feature works by constantly taking screenshots of your activity to build a detailed searchable timeline of everything you've ever seen or done. | ||
Almost immediately, critics and security researchers labeled the feature a privacy nightmare, pointing out that a single piece of malware could gain access to a user's entire digital life. | ||
In response to the backlash, Microsoft promised that users will be able to filter which apps get recorded, but some developers are not waiting around, and apparently the Brave browser is not going to be compatible with the recall program on your computer. | ||
Who here knew that Windows had automatically implemented a program to take a screenshot of your computer constantly and store it constantly? | ||
Yeah, it'd be that type of program, that type of AI implementation, that type of surveillance that would very easily work well with what's being proposed in Western countries. | ||
So it won't be, I mean, it's not your information, it's Microsoft's information. | ||
See, Microsoft, and this, again, it ties in, like all of this ties in together. | ||
The whole phenomenon of, you know, the rent economy, where you aren't going to own your phone, you aren't going to own your house, you aren't going to own your car, all of that, in addition to just redesigning humanity itself to be more bug-like and therefore more easily controllable. | ||
It also, all of these apply to the circumvention or the de facto eradication of constitutional protections in the Bill of Rights. | ||
If you don't own your home, they don't have to have your permission to search your home. | ||
If you don't own your phone, they don't have to have your permission to own your phone. | ||
And if your software isn't actually sold to you, but rather rented to you on a license basis, then the photos that Microsoft is taking of your screen, they don't belong to you either. | ||
They belong to Microsoft and are stored on Microsoft servers and therefore can be accessed without a warrant, thereby circumventing the limitations of the Constitution. | ||
So they're just doing it. | ||
They're just doing all of this and it's all happening at once and it's all aligning with each other. | ||
But there's more subtle ways that they're censoring people as well. | ||
I'll get to that in just a second. | ||
But before we go to how this is, you know, the AI and the social media censorship is happening on an individual level, let's watch some videos about the UK. | ||
Here is video clip 11 of a man being sentenced to 20 months in prison, nearly two years behind bars, for a social media post. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
Your sentence is unavoidable. | |
Would you stand, please? | ||
The sentence that I pass has been reduced by one-third to reflect your guilty plea. | ||
The sentence is one of 20 months imprisonment. | ||
You will serve up to one half of your sentence in custody before you are released on license. | ||
They try to manage jail for five years because of a social media post. | ||
unidentified
|
To serve some or all of the remainder of the custodial term. | |
Unless I misunderstood that. | ||
Do you say he removed a third or that he only sentenced him to a third because of his guilty plea? | ||
He says, I lowered your sentence to a third of what it could be because of your guilty plea. | ||
So if he's sentenced for 12 months and that's just, or 20 months, and that's just a third of what they wanted, they were asking for 60 months. | ||
They tried to send a man to jail for five years over a social media post. | ||
There were stories last summer of violent criminals being let out of prison in England because of overcrowding. | ||
You remember that? | ||
Remember at the same time they were mass arresting peaceful protesters and throwing people in prison? | ||
Again, I go over this all the time on American Journal, but the one story that always sticks in my mind is the woman who posted on Facebook an article that she found. | ||
She didn't write the article. | ||
She found an article posted on Facebook with the caption, I don't know if this is true, but if it is, we're in for trouble. | ||
And she was sentenced to prison for that post. | ||
She didn't write the article. | ||
She found an article, thought it was legit, posted on Facebook with the caveat, I don't know if this is true. | ||
She was still sentenced to prison for months at the same time that they were letting out violent criminals because of prison overcrowding. | ||
Again, just wrap your mind around that fact. | ||
It's just absurd. | ||
But as a consequence of people being released from prison because of overcrowding, you had examples of people. | ||
There were two guys who together murdered a child with a machete. | ||
They murdered a kid, like I think like an 11-year-old kid. | ||
They murdered him with a machete, and they were let out in less than a year. | ||
Okay, so you have people in the UK right now being sentenced to prison for five years because of a social media post while they're simultaneously letting out people who committed murder in under a year. | ||
Okay, just so we're clear of what their priorities are. | ||
All right. | ||
Now let's go to clip number nine. | ||
This has to be one of the craziest things I've like ever seen anybody say. | ||
I can't even explain to you how out of left field and how whack this statement is. | ||
I mean, I can't even set it up correctly. | ||
But just keep in mind that the Online Safety Act. | ||
Yeah, there you go. | ||
Agony for mother of teen killed and machete attack after learning one of his killers might be released after just six months due to prison overcrowding under new labor scheme. | ||
So yeah. | ||
Sorry, he has to be let out. | ||
There's a mother of two that needs to be put in there because she clicked the wrong article on Facebook. | ||
Age verification laws send VPN use soaring and threaten the open air. | ||
So all you have to understand is this has literally nothing to do with online safety. | ||
Okay? | ||
Just nothing. | ||
Just has nothing to do with children, with access to inappropriate material. | ||
It has everything to do with silencing opposition to the policies that the government is implementing. | ||
That's all. | ||
Stopping organization for right-wing nationalist groups to spread their message or to collaborate with each other. | ||
And of course, the chilling effect of just understanding That be careful about what you say, or you might go to jail. | ||
So, why don't you censor yourself so we don't have to? | ||
All of these things combine to paint this next clip as the most absurd justification you've ever heard. | ||
Let's go to clip number nine. | ||
This is Sky News' Kyle something talking about Nigel Farage's opposition to the Online Safety Act. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
I see that Nigel Farage is already saying that he's going to overturn these laws. | ||
So, you know, we have people out there who are extreme pornographers, peddling hate, peddling violence. | ||
Nigel Farage is on their side. | ||
Make no mistake about it. | ||
If people like Jimmy Saville were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online. | ||
And Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. | |
Not the side of children who are... | ||
unidentified
|
Do you honestly think to say Nigel Farage is on Jimmy Saville's side? | |
When it comes to online activity, we have seen unfettered access of adults to children via social media. | ||
When we put in the age verification, it stops strange adults getting in touch with children. | ||
So make note of that. | ||
This is a major leap. | ||
unidentified
|
You're going to stick to the fact that you said that Nigel Farage is on Jimmy Saville's side. | |
Nigel Farage is on the side of turning the clock back to the time when strange adults, strangers, can get in touch via messaging apps with children. | ||
We have now asked them to age verify the age in which people can have access to online content so we can protect children from unwanted, dangerous content and also those messaging services where people can get access directly to it. | ||
Nigel Farage wants to turn the clock right back when all of that, oh, I have absolutely no doubt about it. | ||
People are perpetrating more crime online, more danger to children online. | ||
And Nigel Farage has said he wants to overturn every single one of the laws that keeps children safe in our country. | ||
unidentified
|
It's an interesting extrapolation, but we've got your views on it. | |
Let's quickly. | ||
It's an interesting extrapolation. | ||
Oh, it certainly is that. | ||
Nigel Farage is basically Jimmy Saville now because he's against the Online Safety Act. | ||
I mean, the number of absurdities in that statement alone. | ||
Oh boy. | ||
Now, don't get me wrong. | ||
The access that predators have to children is a gigantic issue that we talk about all the time on this show and on every show. | ||
Talk about it with Alex Rosen all the time. | ||
And every time I talk to him, we re-emphasize what he told me the first time we talked, which was it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when. | ||
If you have children online, they will be approached. | ||
They will be solicited by perverts. | ||
It's just, he talks about, you know, making a fake account, pretending to be a middle school girl. | ||
And within like 10 minutes, he's got like four messages from creepy old men. | ||
So it's a problem. | ||
I'm not going to deny that, you know, that's one of the major like horrifying things that just happens pretty much unabated in this country is the access that adults have to communicating with children through their devices. | ||
That could absolutely be stopped in like a billion different ways with all of the access or controls that they already have in place. | ||
And some that we point out all the damn time. | ||
In like one year, there will be like 100 million instances of CSAM material, child sexual abuse material on Facebook. | ||
100 million reports. | ||
100 million times where people saw it when they didn't want to see it and reported it. | ||
not even including the number of times it was posted with people liking it. | ||
And we always would say, try post a video of Alex Jones. | ||
Try to post an article from Infowars. | ||
Try to post something objectionable when it comes to the strictures of political correctness. | ||
Somehow, they have the ability to eradicate that stuff from their sites. | ||
Somehow, they have the ability to identify and remove content in an instant if it comes from Infowars. | ||
But they can't do that for child sexual abuse material, huh? | ||
Maybe they need the child sex abuse material there to justify things like the Online Security Act. | ||
There's no question whatsoever that the control, the surveillance, the algorithms these companies have, they could absolutely eliminate child sexual abuse material, child porn. | ||
They could eradicate, you know, they could stop the communication. | ||
They could monitor for the accounts coming from the IP addresses that commit these types of acts or engage in this type of behavior. | ||
They choose not to. | ||
It is purely a choice not to be involved in that. | ||
I think because they just want government censorship. | ||
Because that's all that, it's the only other option, right? | ||
And we talk about this when it comes to things like TikTok, too. | ||
People get mad that China shows children in China science videos, but they show children in America twerking videos. | ||
And it's like, well, TikTok shows you what you want it to show you. | ||
In America, with no governmental restrictions, if you watch woodworking videos, that's what TikTok is going to show you. | ||
If you watch makeup videos, that's what it's going to show you. | ||
And if you watch weird twerking videos, that's what it's going to show you. | ||
The only other option is to have the government come in and dictate what is and is not appropriate content. | ||
So we just have to make the choice. | ||
Are we, as conscious individuals and parents of children, going to police ourselves and determine for ourselves what we can and can't see and what our children can and can't see? | ||
Or are we surrendering that to the government because that's the only other option? | ||
And again, it is just ridiculous on the face of it that they would even claim this is about protecting children when clearly its most visible and immediate implementation has been to take down videos of protests against immigration to silence people talking about immigration or to force X to verify the age of the people that are there. | ||
And even that is absurd. | ||
Like We showed yesterday on American Journal, like all the people showing their screenshots where it's like they're looking for something on X and it just says, sorry, this is because of local laws in our country, in your country. | ||
You cannot see this until X confirms your age. | ||
It's like, first of all, X confirms my age, again, using this corporate workaround. | ||
But then you've got people like Andy No, who's in the UK, showing that his entire feed is being censored and he's got a verified check mark and he's a creator who shares revenue with Twitter. | ||
They know he's an adult. | ||
So it just has nothing to do with adults or children. | ||
If there's anything to do with children, there would be no restrictions for adults who have proven who they are because they have a credit card and pay for this service or whatever it is. | ||
So it's just ridiculous for them to say that it is about children and then to invoke Jimmy Seville and say Nigel Farage is on the same side of Jimmy Saville satanic pedophile because he thinks it's wrong that the United that the United Kingdom is censoring its own citizens and their political beliefs. | ||
That's called desperation, folks. | ||
And even the Sky News reporter is just like, I'm sorry, can you say that again? | ||
Because that's retarded. | ||
That's a retarded thing to say. | ||
He's responsible for Jimmy Saville now? | ||
Okay. | ||
How did Jimmy Saville do it? | ||
Was the internet around? | ||
No, he was friends with the king, Prince Andrew's bosom buddy? | ||
Not sure what Jimmy Saville has anything to do with this except to put egg on your own face. | ||
Hey, that's me. | ||
Welcome back, folks. | ||
Welcome back. | ||
Final segment of the War Room. | ||
Have a lot to jam in this final segment. | ||
I do want to remind you to go now to the AlexJonesStore.com to get your squeezable Alex Jones head, the stress relief ball, thealxjonesstore.com, thelexjonesstore.com slash Harrison, if you want to let them know who sent you. | ||
But it's a very fun little toy. | ||
It's very affordable, too. | ||
I think it's $9.99 normally. | ||
And if you're a VIP member, it's $7.99. | ||
You're always getting massive discounts if you're a VIP member. | ||
But it makes a great toy. | ||
I say for patriots and haters alike. | ||
I think if you're a patriot, you can have a little Alex Jones head to cherish. | ||
And if you want, you can give it to your globalist friend and say, hey, go take your anger out on this. | ||
Go take your impotent anger out on this non-moving object. | ||
We don't care. | ||
We don't care what you do with it. | ||
Just go. | ||
Go now to thealxjonesstore.com and get your Alex Jones head there. | ||
And you can put it on your own doll. | ||
And somebody say they're going to put it as a stick shifter on their truck. | ||
I think that's a good idea. | ||
Whatever you want to do with it, the world is yours. | ||
ThealexjonesStore.com. | ||
All right, let's finish up here with the UK Online Safety Censorship Act. | ||
And this is from Stark Naked Brief on X. He says, we need to talk about Peter Kyle MP. | ||
That's the person we just saw on Sky News, telling you that Nigel Farage is basically Jimmy Seville because he actually believes in free speech. | ||
A absurd and desperate attempt to stop people opposing this obvious violation of the fundamental beliefs of the British people, who were the ones who first established the idea of individualism and liberalism and the Magna Carta and free speech as a concept only came about because of a series of civil wars, one of which was the American Revolution, in which we codified the First Amendment as the number one rule in our book under the Bill of Rights. | ||
And thank God we did that because we have some hedge of protection against what is happening in Europe, which despite being the birthplace and the cultural center of the concept of free speech, has abandoned that in favor of collective suicide. | ||
So Peter Kyle, the guy we just saw lying about Farage and conflating him with Jimmy Saville, of all people. | ||
He's Keir Starmer's science secretary, a rising figure in Labor's front bench. | ||
Turns out he's got quite a few skeletons in his closet. | ||
Earlier today, Peter Kyle, minister responsible for UK technology policy, did the media rounds promoting the government's new age verification rules under the online censorship. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
Oh, I'm sorry. | ||
I meant Online Safety Act. | ||
My bad. | ||
These are the provisions of age gating the internet, requiring users to hand over personal information to access what the state deems dangerous content. | ||
Kyle repeated the usual government lines about child safety and protection until Nigel Farage's name came up. | ||
Then, astonishing even the Sky News presenter, Kyle claimed that Farage's opposition to the act meant he was effectively on the side of notorious pedophile, Jimmy Saville. | ||
It constituted one hell of a statement likely intended to quash criticism rather than meaningfully engage in it. | ||
You see, the act has come under fire in recent days as Ofcom, Britain's broadcasting and internet regulator, imposed the new age verification restrictions on all sorts of political content. | ||
Far from just censoring pornography, self-harm, and child abuse, as promised, the act is forcing acts to suppress footage of protests, parliamentary speeches on child sex abuse, and even pictures of transcripts from grooming gang cases. | ||
Put differently, the act has led to the censorship of both child sex abuse crimes and reports about them, undermining any claim it's just about protection. | ||
Now, Kyle's outburst, which he has since doubled down on, is even more curious in light of his past associations. | ||
Now, before we get to those, I want to just moll for a moment. | ||
I want to just, you know, soak for a moment in the bottomless irony of the fact that the British government, in total opposition to the will of the British people, as expressed time and time again in nationwide polls or in plebiscites like Brexit, time and time again, the British government, or the British people rather, have demanded less migration, remigration. | ||
They don't want to be swamped by foreigners. | ||
Well, the government does it anyway because F you. | ||
In consequence of that, and God only knows what the number is now, but a couple years ago, the official number of British girls, white English girls, abused, raped, or otherwise attacked by Muslim men was upwards of a million. | ||
A million British girls are abused by pedophiles as a consequence of this immigration program. | ||
And now, ostensibly to protect children from sexual abuse, they're making it illegal to oppose the program that led to a million British girls being raped. | ||
Do you understand? | ||
Can we wrap our minds or can we just let that soak in for a minute? | ||
That the number one thing you could possibly do to lessen the instances of sexual abuse in the UK would be massive deportation or at the very least restricting the importation of more foreign rapists. | ||
But if you want to do that, you'll be censored by the very law ostensibly passed to protect girls and children from abuse. | ||
So it's just the number of ways this is absurd, the number of inconsistencies or hypocrisies on display here is truly something to behold. | ||
So now back to this character who wants to conflate Nigel Farage with Jimmy Seville because of, well, because that's convenient for him, I guess. | ||
He's campaigned with and been photographed multiple times alongside Ivor Kaplan, Tony Blair's former defense minister, who was arrested in January by Sussex police on the suspicion of child sex offenses. | ||
Oh, really? | ||
Oh, gosh. | ||
I'm so surprised. | ||
You know, one of the absurdities of all of this is the well-established fact that the British establishment is replete with pedophiles. | ||
I mean, from the king on down, it's pedophiles all the way down. | ||
So, again, just a little bit absurd for the actual pedophiles in the British government letting in the millions of pedophiles from foreign nations, saying Nigel Farage is in league with pedophiles because he won't be okay with the censorship that allows the migrants to come in to rape the British kids. | ||
I think we understand. | ||
It's just kind of hard to wrap your mind around. | ||
Kaplan denies wrongdoing. | ||
Police say the investigation remains ongoing and active. | ||
Last we heard, Kaplan had his police bail extended in April. | ||
And they say, while these obviously don't prove that Kyle knew of Kaplan's alleged crime, it certainly casts a light on who he spends his time with. | ||
Given that, one would think he'd hold off on such baseless accusations against Farage. | ||
Then there's Kyle's financial record suggesting he might be one of the most conflicted figures in Westminster. | ||
And that's really saying something. | ||
In February, his department handed a 2.3 million contract to Faculty AI, the same company that had donated £36,000 to him in May of 2024. | ||
Another firm, Public Digital, gave Kyle £66,000 that same year. | ||
It seconded a tech expert, Emily Middleton, to his office, who was later appointed director general to his apartment on taxpayer-funded salary of £128,000. | ||
It might come as no surprise to you that Public Digital subsequently received a government contract worth £5 million earlier this month. | ||
So just straight up pay for play. | ||
We'll get you elected. | ||
You give us the contracts. | ||
Then we censor everybody so nobody can know this is happening. | ||
So the tech minister takes thousands of pounds from one firm, signs off on a multi-million pound contract for them. | ||
Then he accepts more from Public Digital and gives a senior government job along with a six-figure salary to somebody from that firm. | ||
And they receive an even bigger contract. | ||
He receives 6,000 pounds from Anthony Watson, a former Nike executive and founder of the Bank of London, a troubled institution that faced being struck off over debts to HMRC. | ||
And it goes on and on and on. | ||
A 2019 internal report by JPMorgan also linked Mendelssohn to Epstein after his 2008 conviction for procuring a child for prostitution. | ||
Of course, we can't forget Kyle's alignment with global technocrats. | ||
In June, his department announced a new partnership with the World Economic Forum for AI-driven innovation, proudly revealing that a WEF global center would soon be based in Britain. | ||
What a lovely thing for them. | ||
So again, these are the people that are censoring you and claiming that opposition makes you a pedophile. | ||
They, for some reason and without their knowledge, are literally surrounded by pedophiles. | ||
Now, that's how censorship is working, both in the corporate world with the Israeli operatives being planted in big tech companies to silence anything that shines light on the Zionist activity in Gaza or elsewhere, or the way that they control the media, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
Then you've got the way that this is being done in governments, rather, where you've got the UK online safety bill. | ||
This only comes after the Digital Services Act, DSA, that the EU put forward and that Ireland is sort of leading the charge on. | ||
But then you have the individual level of censorship, which we'll explore here. | ||
Smocahontis, 2024 on X, said this, this morning I got a text from my boss that said, hey, I need to talk to you. | ||
Instantly, she says, my stomach dropped. | ||
A few minutes later, he sent me screenshots. | ||
Facebook had flagged one of my posts about Dr. Moore and COVID. | ||
Their AI system actually reached out to him to ask if my post aligned with his morals and values. | ||
Yes, an algorithm tried to drag my boss into a moral review of my personal Facebook post. | ||
Let that sink in. | ||
AI, not a real person, not a human moderator, decided my content was controversial enough to alert my employer and spark a values check. | ||
That's how far it's gone. | ||
Luckily, she says I have an incredible boss who immediately shut it down with two sharp responses defending my right to speak. | ||
But the fact that an AI is now programmed to involve your workplace in content disputes, that should terrify everybody. | ||
So this is crazy. | ||
So this is, I guess, Meta itself took it upon itself to scan her content, have a problem with it, email her boss, I guess, to try to get her fired. | ||
Like, what? | ||
So Meta's AI is trying to get people fired now for what they post online? | ||
So people asked, how did they know your boss's email? | ||
I wouldn't use any site that knows that. | ||
And she says, well, for clarification, the reason I was so easily flagged is because I'm listed as an administrator on our business's Facebook page. | ||
Both my information and my employers are connected to the page through Meta's administrative settings, which made it easy for the platform to find the contact info. | ||
So because she's associated with her company on Facebook, Facebook then sends her boss an email with objectionable posts from her in an attempt to get her fired. | ||
It's crazy, but that's just how it is. | ||
Okay, that's not the only way that companies and HR is being used to basically create a de facto social credit score for everybody on earth. | ||
Let's go to clip number 38 here. | ||
Private companies pushing through the China model of socialist social credit scores. | ||
And it's getting people fired. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
This video. | ||
So I recently just graduated and a buddy of mine had secured a job at a Fortune 500 company. | ||
I mean, this dude had everything. | ||
He had over a 4.0 GPA. | ||
He had heavily involvement with many different clubs. | ||
He had amazing test scores, everything. | ||
Got the job. | ||
Okay. | ||
Was there for about two months? | ||
And his boss says, hey, I need you to come in one day to speak to him. | ||
And so he goes in and his boss goes to him. | ||
He goes, what is this? | ||
And you know what he does? | ||
He pulls up his Twitter from like 10 years ago. | ||
And he says, what are these tweets? | ||
And my buddy's like, y'all seriously did like a background check on me? | ||
And he's like, yeah, no, we have like a whole department that's dedicated towards doing background checks on social media. | ||
And this popped up on your Twitter. | ||
And it was some stuff I won't go over, but let's just say it was some dark humor. | ||
And his boss was like, this is against company policy. | ||
And unfortunately, we're going to have to let you go. | ||
And my buddy was like, but it was over 10 years ago. | ||
Like, those aren't even related to my, like, what, how I think now. | ||
And my, and he goes, his boss said, that doesn't matter. | ||
Like, these are connected to your account, which you represent our company. | ||
So we're going to have to fire you. | ||
So he got fired. | ||
All that work, all that hard work. | ||
And he gets fired over a couple tweets. | ||
So he tells me the story. | ||
And I was like, because I work in social media, I was like, well, have you used TweetDelete? | ||
Essentially, a platform that lets you delete like all your tweets instantly and it consolidates it all. | ||
And there's a few other features as well. | ||
And he's like, no, I've never heard of that before. | ||
And so I had him make an account and now he's clearing up his Twitter. | ||
He's cleaning up everything for when he goes to his next job. | ||
That doesn't happen. | ||
And he's currently applying right now. | ||
So we'll see if he can find the job. | ||
But just a warning for anyone that's trying to find a job right now, your social media, your digital footprint matters. | ||
So, again, very troubling development, but this is what happens when your entire nation, or at least culturally, your entire people are taken over by a bunch of leftist psychos. | ||
That's going to happen. | ||
So fair warning to everybody out there. | ||
Of course, long term, these companies are only damaging themselves, but that censorship. | ||
That censorship in the world today, and I'll read one final comment about censorship that sort of goes along with everything that we've talked about so far. | ||
This is from Elon Mirazi at Elon underscore Mirazi. | ||
He says, welcome to the Ashkenazi Inquisition. | ||
Censorship is one of those rare occasions where a little bit of pathos is justified. | ||
So forgive me for using it here. | ||
He says, I'm a Jew, an authentic Middle Eastern Arab Jew with authentic Arab Jewish bloodlines that stretch back centuries, possibly farther into the past. | ||
I'm not only a Jew, I was born in Israel with both my patrilineal grandparents were born in Palestine, as were their parents and grandparents and great-grandparents before them, and so on. | ||
And I was not only born in Israel, but I served in the IDF. | ||
My two young brothers served in the IDF. | ||
My father served in the IDF and was a reserve soldier for decades in several major Israeli wars. | ||
Zionism was supposed to be about me, basically. | ||
It was supposed to offer me maximum freedom and protection, right? | ||
But Zionism, that is, the rule of rich Ashkenazi people, is now the main, if not the only, threat to my livelihood, my freedom of speech, my well-being, and my peace of mind in general. | ||
YouTube, a media platform owned by a Zionist Ashkenazi Jew, is now deleting my content on a regular basis now. | ||
As a Jew and former Israeli, I am forbidden from dissecting Zionism on the world's largest media platform for video content. | ||
And when do they remove my anti-Zionist content? | ||
In the days when the whole world is staggered by the depravity and cruelty of the Zionist state, the Israeli human rights organizations, a couple of the largest and most important of them yesterday, issued detailed reports about what they now call Israel's genocide in Gaza. | ||
But you're not allowed to talk about it. | ||
Even if you're an Israeli, even if you're a Zionist, you're not allowed to talk about it. | ||
He says, you're not allowed to condemn Zionism on YouTube or basically almost anywhere else in the West, even if you're Jewish. | ||
Who the F appointed Western and Ashkenazi elites to be the arbiters of acceptable and forbidden political beliefs? | ||
Did you? | ||
I know I didn't. | ||
He says, I'm not bitter. | ||
They're losing, and all the censorship of the world won't help them. | ||
But I'm also honored to be part of a long line of Jewish Arab intellectuals, scholars, political, and social activists who have been persecuted, censored, harassed, fired, or worse by the Ashkenazi Zionist state. | ||
And on a personal note, Sergi Bran, you stand no freaking chance against Abdallah's grandson. | ||
I guess they're debating. | ||
So that is Alan Mizrah. | ||
He and he had a video called Zionism is a Crime Against Humanity removed from YouTube and his livelihood at threat since he depends on income from YouTube, showing once again, it actually isn't about just protecting Jews. | ||
It's about, in particular, protecting the Jewish state of Israel, which in and of itself is simply one aspect or one part or one prerequisite for the globalist scheme of having a one world government based in Jerusalem, | ||
based in Israel, using Israel to spark World War III to cause absolute chaos and death and devastation, for which the people of the world will cry out for a savior and they will supply the Antichrist and he will be enthroned in Jerusalem as all the world religions are folded into one that worship the beast. | ||
Okay, so just so we're clear on what the point of all of this truly is at the end of the day. | ||
Now, I got a bunch of videos I was not able to get to today, and I want to go to a few of them totally without context or, you know, transition from what we were just talking about. | ||
Let's go to clip number 24, where we see the true insanity of Australia on full display. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
unidentified
|
The city council that looks after Bondi Beach is under fire this morning for removing the free weights from its iconic outdoor gym amid fears the area is, quote, attracting too much testosterone. | |
Believe it or not, a lot of people do go to Bondi Beach not to relax or swim, but to pump iron and also film themselves pumping iron. | ||
Waverly Council says the weights were trip hazards. | ||
There have also been concerns raised recently about the gym primarily being used by men, alienating women, apparently. | ||
Alienating women, apparently. | ||
unidentified
|
What? | |
No, wait, what? | ||
What did they say? | ||
So there's an outdoor gym at a beach, and because men use it, they're shutting it down. | ||
Nobody's stopping women from using it. | ||
There are no rules about women using it or not. | ||
They just don't. | ||
And apparently that means it has to go away. | ||
Too many men use the gym, so now it has to go away. | ||
It's attracting too much testosterone. | ||
Australia? | ||
Pull your ass out of here. | ||
Pull your head out of your ass. | ||
Get in gear. | ||
What the hell are you doing? | ||
Too much testosterone? | ||
The freeway to the beach? | ||
And don't you love? | ||
I mean, again, it just ties into everything that we're talking about here. | ||
Where it's like, it's clearly this is just like they just hate men. | ||
They just, you know, they're just doing it because they can. | ||
It's not actually affecting them. | ||
They just see men being strong by themselves. | ||
And they're just like, this is bad. | ||
We have to stop this. | ||
So like, it's just, it's just ridiculous on the face of it. | ||
But then they're like, no, the free rights, they're tripping hazards. | ||
That's what it is. | ||
No, it's because we care about safety. | ||
It's they're tripping hazards. | ||
And we don't want people tripping on the beach. | ||
Okay, right. | ||
Sure. | ||
That's what it's about tripping. | ||
I'm sure. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 28 because this is a huge one. | ||
This is monumental. | ||
And we can get into some of the other stuff about climate change. | ||
In fact, I got an even better video to go to. | ||
Let's go to clip number 36 first, just to again remind ourselves of the absurdity of the entire climate change agenda and the people claiming to fight it. | ||
Let's go to clip 36 first. | ||
Nothing says saving the planet like bulldozing a rainforest for a climate summit highway. | ||
A four-lane highway is being built through tens of thousands of acres of protected Amazon rainforest to accommodate traffic for the COP30 climate summit in Brazil. | ||
The event, scheduled for November, will host over 50,000 attendees at the official UN climate conference. | ||
I'm not kidding. | ||
I think if you actually added it up, I think climate change may be responsible for more trees being destroyed than any other thing ever. | ||
Like they've killed, they chopped down 12 million trees in Scotland to build windmills. | ||
Did you know that? | ||
Bill Gates has a program where they just chop trees and bury them as carbon capture sinks. | ||
They chop down trees, convert it into wood pellets, and burn it for fuel as an alternative to coal in England in the Drax power plant. | ||
And now they're tearing out God only knows how many trees in the Amazon rainforest to build a road for the COP climate change summit. | ||
Okay. | ||
All right. | ||
So just so we're aware of how absurd the climate change program is, let's go back to what it was all founded on. | ||
Clip 28, here's Lee Zeldon talking about destroying the basis of the climate change agenda. | ||
Let's watch. | ||
What happened back in the Obama administration in 2009 was that they put forward this regulation called the endangerment funding. | ||
Now, a lot of people are out there listening. | ||
They might not know what the endangerment funding is. | ||
If you were asked congressional Democrats to describe what it is, the left would say that it means that carbon dioxide is a pollutant. | ||
Carbon dioxide is an endangerment to human health. | ||
They might say methane is a pollutant. | ||
Methane is an endangerment to human health. | ||
And that's an oversimplified, I would say, inaccurate way to describe it. | ||
The way they did this was following a Supreme Court case in Massachusetts versus EPA. | ||
And the Obama administration said that carbon dioxide, when mixed with a bunch of other well-mixed gases, the greenhouse gases, that it contributes to climate change. | ||
How much? | ||
They don't say. | ||
It's more than zero. | ||
And they say that climate change endangers human health. | ||
So because of these different mental leaps, and by the way, when it's carbon dioxide mixed with all these well-mixed gases, they were only looking at mobile sources like vehicles. | ||
But a bunch of those greenhouse gases aren't even emitted from vehicles. | ||
Now, why does all of this matter? | ||
Like right out of the gate here, we're getting very wonky on what this regulation means. | ||
Well, then there were all sorts of different vehicle regulations that followed. | ||
So this is like the endangerment finding in and of itself is the hub to the spoke of the left's environmental agenda, essentially. | ||
So this has been referred to as basically driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion. | ||
Driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change agenda. | ||
That's Lee Zeldon, Trump's EPA pick, his EPA director, talking about having revoked the Obama-era endangerment finding, which forms basically the basis of all of the climate change agenda crap that came after it, because that was the so-called finding that allowed them to demonize literally life itself by saying carbon was threatening the earth or threatening humanity on the earth. | ||
So again, just absurdity piled upon absurdity. | ||
All of this continues at a pace. | ||
And, you know, at least in some cases, Trump's administration is fighting back against it. | ||
That is a very big blow to the whole climate change agenda, which of course is necessary for their beast financial control, as they will soon claim that anything you purchase will be purchased with carbon credits for which you only have an allotted amount. | ||
Go to the Aux June store. | ||
The Aux June store right now, the Auxjunstore.com. | ||
Go there today. | ||
unidentified
|
Go. | |
There's a reason why supplements are so big and so popular and have such a great result. | ||
It's because whether it's your diet, whether it's your exercise routine, the point is you're lacking in some very important vitamins, very important minerals that can make you healthier, live longer, and feel better. | ||
We're also under constant attack, Owen, and that's what's very important. | ||
So the modern human living experience, the environment that we subject ourselves to, it's the equivalent of smoking like a couple packs of cigarettes every single day. | ||
Like that's the bad food that we eat. | ||
That's the poison in the water, X, Y, Z. So it's kind of like what happens is, Reck Jones in studio with me, we're about to make a very exciting new product announcement here. | ||
So what ends up happening is whether it's the modern day diet or whether it's the modern day atmosphere or whether it's, you know, a sedative state, you're not getting whatever it is you need to make your body function at its highest capabilities. | ||
Absolutely correct. | ||
And that's why we created these two new formulas that are now live at the AlexJonestore.com. | ||
So we've got Methyl Drive here and we've also got Power Plant. | ||
Now, both of them, at their core, they do around the same type of thing. | ||
It's increasing fuel for you to create new mitochondria. | ||
It's increasing mitochondrial efficiency. | ||
It's reducing oxidative stress and XYZ, other things like that. | ||
Now, I want to single out PowerPlant really quick. | ||
If you're a guy and you're looking for a boost, a healthy, sustainable testosterone boost, we made PowerPlant specifically for someone that wants to increase their free testosterone. | ||
I remember when I was looking into supplements and stuff and different things like, you know, people don't get enough boron. | ||
They don't even know what boron is. | ||
And I remember one thing that always stuck in my head, and that's, you know, it's just true. | ||
Well, what does boron kind of rhyme with, folks? | ||
Just leave it at that. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
We've got bits and pieces of a system here that comes together and provides you just the antioxidant support you need, the testosterone support you need, the mitochondrial health support you need. | ||
It's all there. | ||
It's all together. | ||
It's in both of these products. | ||
You could take both of these at the same time and experience a heck of a lot of benefits. | ||
Now, I would say younger, older. | ||
You're an older person, you need more overall body support, you need the overall antioxidant support. | ||
I would go with the methyl drive. | ||
But if you're a younger person or someone looking for a performance boost, I would go with the power plant. | ||
I can enhance what I'm doing here, maybe like 10fold with the right supplement routine. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
I totally agree with that statement. | ||
Look, the reason why this is called PowerPlant is because it has cordyceps in it. | ||
Now, of course, the mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell and all that, but cordyceps is like an elite top tier S tier ingredient, which increases the amount of ATP you make, which indirectly helps you make more mitochondria. | ||
But beyond that, it increases your oxygen-carrying capacity. | ||
So you want to talk about workouts. | ||
You want to talk about power. | ||
You want to talk about strength. | ||
Talk about power plan. | ||
And that's what you need, especially when you're doing a heavy lift and you need to have good breathing or you're doing long form cardio and you need to have strong breathing. | ||
That's where this is going to come into play. | ||
And when you started talking about the new product that we just came out with with the PQQ and the CoQ10, folks, I'm telling you, it's like if I had to do a list of like, okay, if someone said you can pick five things that you're going to get in a supplement, like what are the most important things? | ||
Guarantee you, you asked me a hundred times, PQQ and CoQ10 are on that list for me a hundred times. | ||
Vitamin B12, as methylcobalamin, the good kind. | ||
Magnesium, coenzyme Q10, CoQ10, PQQ, black pepper for absorption. | ||
You can't ask for a better catch-all, really. | ||
And the synergy that both of these products have with the methylene blue is unparalleled. | ||
You will not find a better product on the market that's targeted in that specific way because we made these for you, the customer, and for ourselves because we believe in the product. | ||
We take the product. | ||
ThealexjonesStore.com to get these new products. | ||
Try them for yourself. | ||
I know they're going to become a staple. | ||
I see Rex working out here every once in a while. | ||
We've worked out in the gym every once in a while. | ||
And, you know, he's really excited about this stuff. |