Owen Shroyer dissects Trump’s 2025 NATO summit claims—dubbing U.S.-led strikes on Iran’s nuclear program a "flawless success" despite conflicting intel—and ties Spain’s spending cuts to broader skepticism of NATO’s role, warning it could backfire politically. He mocks Joy Reid’s media return and fiscal naiveté while contrasting Zohran Mamdani’s anti-Israel stance with pro-war Democrats like Moskowitz, whose Anti-Semitism Act he calls a free-speech suppression tool. Trump’s past foreign policy wins and Dr. Mark Perlmutter’s testimony on Gaza’s civilian toll underscore his argument for U.S. disengagement, framing current conflicts as distractions from domestic priorities. Meanwhile, election interference theories and LGBTQ flag-burning debates reveal Shroyer’s broader critique of perceived elite hypocrisy and media bias. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, it is Wednesday, June 25th, 2025.
This is the InfoWars War Room.
The fastest three hours on the internet starts now.
We got a lot of audio.
President Trump meeting with NATO, and of course, taking questions from the press, scolding the press multiple times, using the bully pulpit to push Jerome Powell around successfully.
And then Trump responding to the latest reports in the aftermath of the strikes on Iran, as well as other members of his cabinet who were there with him, and the press secretary as well addressing this, as there was a major leak, at least that's the story, a major leak that they're trying to address.
And now trust is so low after it that the intelligence briefings that they were supposed to have are now all being canceled.
So we'll play Trump's audio on multiple different subjects that he spoke about today.
And then we'll look into this back and forth over the success of the strikes, all the different angles and what each party would be reporting and why.
Because I think when you look at it from that angle, you start to understand what's going on, what's coming out of Israel, what's coming out of Iran, what's coming out of President Trump.
But we will hear some audio.
Now, there's still the backlash.
If you tune into this show, then you were anticipating the victory for Mom Donnie last night.
We had that one pinned for you.
Knew that was going to happen while everybody else is shocked.
And I understand that the right has been real unified in the purpose of getting Trump back into the White House.
But we can't get lost now that we have Trump in there.
And we have to remember that there are still other people that vote.
There are still people that will be undecided.
And not everything just becomes a Trump promo.
So we have to be careful not to fall into that trap.
And what I've noticed is when you try to just report things from a neutral perspective, people are still kind of stuck in that cycle, that loop of, no, everything is to promote Trump, everything is to get Trump back in the White House.
Well, that's a done deal.
So when I look at that race last night and I'm doing some reporting on it, getting attacked, I'm saying, if you don't understand why Mom Donnie won, then you're just not up to speed.
You're just not paying attention.
You're not following the bouncing ball.
You're still trapped in the Trump election cycle, which is over.
It's over now.
So if you want to just do political walk and talk about election cycles, that cycle is done.
We are in a new cycle.
And now that the Republicans have lost ground because of the Middle East issue, the Democrats are going to stand on that ground and they're going to get victories on that ground.
So we'll review that and kind of all the different surrounding parts about it as well.
And then some other news out of Iran.
And then I've got some other geopolitical news out of China as well that we will look into.
And then some other ins and outs American politics.
And, you know, I think that it's going to be a hard thing to admit.
And we can celebrate, we can celebrate our troops.
And if you want to call the mission and Iran success, hey, that's fine.
But it's probably not going to be a big political win as it's being reported.
And APAC, which is more exposed than ever, is in panic mode.
Yes, I'll explain that as well.
All right, before we get into these clips and these headlines, let's talk about the different angles as far as were the strike successful or not.
And so let's talk about the Israel angle, let's talk about the Iran angle, and let's talk about the Trump angle.
Now, the story that's coming out, and we're going to hear from Pete Hagseth and Trump on this, and then there's some headlines today as well.
But the story is they had different intel sources, obviously.
Then they had like the final intel that came out of the White House that suggested that it might not have been successful or it could have been a massive success.
In other words, you know, that's the range, I guess, indicating they don't know for sure.
Now, Trump is saying he has new intelligence they do know for sure, but they believe somebody leaked out that intelligence to CNN, at least, or someone gave it to CNN, but somebody leaked it.
And so now they're trying to fill holes, figure out who it might be.
They're canceling intelligence briefings on the Iran strikes.
But before we get to the clips and the headlines, so let's think about it like this.
If you're, I guess let's start with Israel.
If you're Israel and their agenda is pretty clear here, then you want the story to be that they're not destroyed.
You need that boogeyman.
You need that global warming for Republicans.
Iran nukes forever.
The earth will melt in five years.
Iran will have nukes in five years.
So it's the same propaganda strategy, this anvil hanging over your head of Iranian nukes.
You need to do something about it.
So if you're Israel, you want the story to be that they weren't Destroyed.
You want the story to be that they'll be back operational, or you didn't hit the uranium, whatever it is, but you want to keep that boogeyman alive.
You want to suspend that anvil over people's heads again.
So they want that to be the story.
Now, would they know?
Would they not know?
Do you think Iran is going to be honest with President Trump about it?
Now, if Iran, which we know has already penetrated with Israeli spies, which is really so crazy to think about, and I'm picturing this in my head, so are Israeli spies like flying in?
Are they walking in?
And they just have all these drones with them and they're making building materials?
I mean, how is this going?
For years, is Israel just slowly but surely bringing in drones and supplies and building a base basically in Iran, just slowly over the years through the borders?
But I digress.
And then Israel, apparently, reports coming out that they had to go back and they struck it again.
So there's mixed reports on that.
But Israel wants that anvil suspended over your head.
So they want the perception to be, oh, no, they can get the nuke sites back up and running.
Now, if you're Iran, now, how would Israel even know unless they're Mossad agents that were embedded in Iran were able to get access to the base so that they could find out for sure what the situation was and then report back to Israel?
Well, Iran is hunting Mossad agents right now.
They've already caught, word is hundreds of them.
So do you really think the Mossad agents are going to be trying to go back to the base or go back to the nuclear facilities while they know Iran is hunting Mossad agents?
I don't know if that's really happening, but I suppose that could be the case.
So that would be how Israel would get the intel.
Now, if you're Iran, what are you going to tell President Trump?
Oh, yes, they're absolutely destroyed.
Totally devastated.
Donald, it's done.
It's over.
We give up.
White flag.
No need to strike again.
You got us.
You destroyed it.
We're done.
It's over.
Yes, all the nuclear material, all the uranium, completely destroyed, Donald.
It's obliterated.
You got us.
It's over.
We surrender.
If Iran is really trying to have a secret nuclear program, what do you think they're going to tell Donald Trump?
They're going to tell him, yep, you blew it up.
It's done.
It's over.
Nothing to see here.
Move along.
So Iran would want that to be the story.
And then if you're President Trump, you want to show support for the military.
You want to show support for the men and women that got on the actual airplanes and did the 36-hour mission and bombed the facilities, got back safe.
It was a huge issue here in the States about the bombings.
You want it to be a success story.
You want to praise the people that were on the plane that did it.
So for Trump, it's like, yes, it was a success.
We obliterated it.
Total success, total victory.
It's great.
It's the best thing ever.
So Trump says they're destroyed.
If you had to choose between the three parties who to believe, it's probably who you're going to believe.
But at the same time, you have to realize that everybody's got their own angle.
Everybody's got their own agenda.
And then you just have to wonder, well, how do you know?
How do you know?
Yeah, we can look at the satellite images that somebody's obviously feeding to the media to claim that it's destroyed, but that doesn't really prove anything.
These things are how deep underground?
Trump said today with rock and granite and metal and limestone, his huge shelter.
So do you really know?
Would the Mossad agent have told you or would the Massage agent have gotten the hell out of there because he knows he's about to get arrested?
Would Israel really be honest?
Would Iran really be honest?
What intelligence would the United States have other than their own satellite images to go off of?
It's not like Iran is going to invite us into the base.
Hey, come on in.
It's not like we can step in and say, hey, we just bombed your base.
We'd like to come see what it looks like now.
It's not like the massage agent can hang around either and report back to Israel.
So who really knows?
Really, though, I think all that matters at this point is that the bombs stop dropping and that the war stops.
And that's the most important thing.
So whether Trump is being perfectly honest or Iran is being honest or Israel is being honest, whatever the case is, if the bombs stop dropping and the war stops, then that's the most important thing.
And so far, it looks like that's going to be the case.
At least that's been the case for a day now.
And obviously, you hope it stays that way.
But here's Hegzeth talking about the leaks.
He was with Trump and the team at the NATO summit in the Netherlands.
Well, Mr. President, when you talk to the people who built the bombs, understand what those bombs can do, and deliver those bombs, they landed precisely where they were supposed to.
So it was a flawless mission.
Flawless.
Right down where we knew they needed to enter.
And given the 30,000 pounds of explosives and capability of those munitions, it was devastation underneath Fordeau.
And the amount of munitions, six per location, any assessment that tells you it was something otherwise is speculating with other motives.
And we know that because when you actually look at the report, by the way, it was a top-secret report, it was preliminary.
It was low confidence.
All right, so this is a, you make assessments based on what you know that.
It could be very devastating, very severe, severe, and we believe far more likely severe and obliterated.
We're doing a leak investigation with the FBI right now because this information is for internal purposes, battle damage assessments, and CNN and others are trying to spin it to make the president look bad when this was an overwhelming success.
They took bits and pieces from a leaked top-secret intelligence report.
And by the way, I understand the FBI is investigating who was the source of that leak because it's an illegal leak to CNN.
And this is the same fake news CNN reporter who wrote the story alleging that the Hunter-built laptop was Russian disinformation, which we know is one of the greatest political hoaxes this country and the American public have ever seen.
And that CNN story does not change the fact.
There was a total and complete obliteration of Iran's nuclear facilities.
And because of the president's strike, because of the precision of our United States military in this perfectly executed mission, Iran no longer has the capability to produce a nuclear weapon as imminently as they did prior to the strike.
The American people in the world should be grateful for that.
And it's disgusting that CNN and the New York Times are disparaging not just the president, but our brave men and women who helped conduct this highly successful operation.
I don't think I've seen the White House flummoxed ever over a story like this one.
That's just my observation.
I've never seen Caroline Levitt, and I'd say this is the second time where she's had to address the media about this where she just doesn't look comfortable.
I don't know if the crew wants to give me a feedback on this, but other people agree.
It's the first time because I think they're honest.
I don't think they're liars, but I think this is the first time where they feel like, hey, we got to kind of, we got to run a communications operation here.
It's the first time, again, it's what it looks like to me, but it's the first time it seems like Levitt is not extremely comfortable talking about it, dealing with it, and just all the back and forth now, oh, the leaks and everything and the different information coming out.
It's the first time, I think, from this White House where you're just, I don't know.
But I get it.
Again, I get why the president would want to say total success.
I get why that's the message coming out of the White House.
I'm not even mad about it.
Doesn't even bother me because I get why they're doing it.
But at the same time, I'm not just going to sit here and be told, nope, this is what you're going to believe.
This is what it is.
No, I'm going to make my own judgments.
Either way, the most important thing is the same.
The bombs have stopped dropping for now.
Trump officials postponed lawmakers' briefing on Iran strikes.
So they're totally tight-lipped now.
They're shutting down all the different intelligence briefings.
And they're running this investigation now to find out who the leaker is.
Now, this happened right before the strikes.
Kind of went unnoticed until it was sent to me today.
Treasury targets entities procuring sensitive machinery for Iran's defense industry.
This happened right before the strikes.
Today, the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control is designating one individual and eight entities and identifying one vessel as blocked property for the involvement in the procurement and transshipment of sensitive machinery for Iran's defense industry.
Now, I can get into all the different groups here.
Scott Besant said, the United States remains resolved to disrupt any effort by Iran to procure the sensitive dual-use technology components and machinery that underpin the regime's ballistic missile, unmanned aerial vehicle, and asymmetric weapons programs.
We have been clear.
Those who enable these schemes will be held accountable.
Treasury will continue to degrade Iran's ability to produce and proliferate these deadly weapons, which threaten regional stability and global security.
That's interesting.
Again, the whole thing is from the Treasury Department.
So they knew what Iran was getting and when and from who the entire time.
So somebody knows what's going on down there.
Or at least what was going on down there.
The whole thing is really strange, but I still land on the bottom line of if Trump doesn't want there to be a larger war, then he's going to try to do everything to stop there from being a larger war.
I do believe that's what this administration wants.
I'm not of the mind that they can be in charge of it to that degree because the issue between Israel and Iran is long before Trump was president and it'll be long after Trump is gone.
But it looks like this was there was a lot, there was a lot more going on behind the scenes that they knew.
And then they decided to shut all this down before they strike.
So They knew who was giving them or providing them with the materials to engage in these nuclear or uranium facilities, and they shut it down right before they initiated the strikes.
And I guess that's to say we're going to blow it up and you're not going to be able to get the parts again until you come back to the negotiating table and until we can have a transparent deal where you can have civilian use and not make weapons.
But if they knew it the whole time and who was shipping it and now they blew it up and they're saying we're cutting you off your supply, yeah, that kind of went under the table, didn't it?
But sent to me, so I figured I'd cover it.
Iran says 700 arrested for wartime ties with Israel.
Three alleged Mossad agents hanged.
Execution of three accused of spying and mass detentions fuel crackdown fears in Iran.
So now this is going on.
So now you have them hunting for Mossad agents.
And if they find you, it's not going to be good.
So obviously they're going to be trying to get out of there.
I don't think they're going to be going back to the nuclear facility to check on the damage.
I don't know.
Maybe.
But I doubt it.
Now, this was sent to me.
This went out to all the congressional offices.
This went out to everybody in Congress, every member.
And this is the APAC talking points.
What's next?
That's right.
You probably won't see this anywhere else, but decided I'll go ahead and read it for you.
So APAC sent out this email to all the members of Congress.
What's next?
The United States must verify the current intelligence assessment that Iran's capacity to enrich uranium and build a bomb has been destroyed.
So you see, Israel is putting the pressure on here because they're going to want to claim it wasn't destroyed so that we can keep bombing and keep the wars going.
The United States must work with the international community to make clear to Iran the severe repercussions it will face if it attempts to build its nuclear or missile programs.
The United States must work with Israel to rebuild our allies' weapons stockpiles.
Is Israel out of weapons?
Is Israel out of their defense weapons?
Again, this is from APAC, a panicked email from APAC going around to everybody.
The United States must work with Israel to rebuild our allies' weapons stockpiles.
Give Israel more weapons, including its arsenal of missile defense interceptors.
A strong Israeli military is the best deterrent to Israel's enemies.
Sounds like America first to me.
The United States must continue maximum pressure on Iran, including sanctions on Iranian oil sales until Iran agrees to permanently and verifiably abandon its nuclear program and enrichment ambitions, destroying its ballistic missiles, and stop funding, arming, and supporting terrorists.
Congress should pass the Enhanced Iran Sanction Act to make clear to Iran the only path to a brighter economic future is through radical change in all facets of the regime and its dangerous behavior.
Finally, the United States must seek to take advantage of the new dynamic in the region to press for the release of the 50 remaining hostages in Gaza and strive for normalization of ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia.
So this is APAC, their influence, their control over our foreign policy, and continuing to keep us involved in the Israel-Iran war.
This was sent to everybody in Congress in a panicked state, and it's really because Israel's not getting everything it wants from Trump.
They want more weapons.
They want more strikes.
And they want the regime change.
That's really what this is saying in political speak.
They're saying we need more strikes to make sure that the facilities are destroyed.
We need more weapons to make sure we can be defended.
We can't even get the hostages back, so we need you to do that too.
Oh, and by the way, we need regime change.
So it's really frustrating and ridiculous to just witness this blatantly in front of your face.
And then when you report on it, they start calling you names.
They have now made nicknames for me.
I'm now fake MAGA.
And of course, the usual accusation of anti-Semitism.
Everybody can see this now.
It's open game now.
Everybody knows APAC's influence.
Everybody knows that our foreign policy is shaped all around Israel's interest.
It's wide open.
It's an open game.
It's an open field.
You can't even put it back.
It's done.
And if you think accusing people of being anti-Semitic for reporting on it is a winning strategy, you got another thing coming.
And so this is going to tie us into what happened in New York last night.
But I don't know if anyone else is going to share that with you.
These are the APAC talking points that are going out in a panic because Israel is not getting what it wants right now.
And so they're trying to use their controlled Congress to get these messages out so that we can get back involved, more strikes, more weapons for Israel, regime change.
And oh yeah, we can't get the hostages either.
Can you help us with that?
But don't mention it.
Don't cover it.
Or you're that nasty word that we don't even want to say, just that nasty, nasty word.
Now, this all plays into what happened last night.
I'm up against the break now, but I will get to all the Trump clips as well.
But this is really where it's at.
The right wing and the MAGA movement needs to adjust and evolve if it's going to have political victories in the future.
And it's not even, people tend to like, it's kind of like they gravitate everything towards Trump and then they gravitate everything towards Israel, whether it's negative or positive.
But it's not even that.
You have to understand, when you have multiple Republicans that sign bombs, sign bombs with a smile on their face, they're going to be used to kill people, that turns people off.
And when you connect all the dots and you realize our foreign policy is shaped around Israel's interest, and then you see what they're doing in the Gaza Strip, it's a major factor.
They were stunned that a Muslim socialist could win a primary for mayor of New York City.
Now, if you were tuned into this transmission, you saw it coming.
And I'm trying to warn people on the right what you're really dealing with and what's causing this.
And they're lashing out because they don't want to accept the harsh reality of what this represents.
And I do wonder, and this isn't condescending, because we have seen what's happened to parts of Europe.
We have seen what has happened specifically to London, where you go to a lot of these areas now and it's basically overrun with Muslims in traditionally white European Christian countries.
But I'm curious if the Muslims that came up into the political system in Europe, did they come up through the left?
Did they come up as socialists like this guy did?
I mean, this guy's out here.
How Muslim can you be when you're promoting queer sex?
How Muslim can you be when you're flying a pride flag?
So it's kind of a confusing factor.
So I'm not sure if one really is tied into the other.
I'm not sure if, you know, all the Muslims moving into Europe is really directly connected to a Muslim mayor.
Like they say, oh, Sharia law is coming to New York City.
This guy promotes gay sex.
So I don't, I just, it just doesn't add up to me.
But nonetheless, that's a different story.
So this guy shocks America.
He wins the election.
Oh, he was down in the polls and Cuomo was up.
Nobody saw it coming.
No, we saw it coming.
And I'm telling you, this trend is taking over.
People hate to talk about it.
They attack you for saying it, but it's just the truth, folks.
And it's not everything.
There's multiple factors.
A lot of New York liberals are socialists.
They have a young voting class that struggles to get by, can't pay the bills, hates the rich.
He leaned into that.
Those might be the biggest factors, but don't think the Israel fatigue is not a factor.
Don't think for a second when they get up on the debate stage, and I'll play the clip, and every single candidate talks about how they're going to go to Israel except one, and that one candidate wins.
So I know this is really uncomfortable for right-wingers.
I know this is really uncomfortable for conservatives and Republican voters, but I'm telling you the truth.
And as a raw political issue, if you continue to put Israel at the front, you will lose elections.
And it might be way more extreme in New York City than it will be in other races.
But I'm telling you, if you don't recognize this and you make Israel the biggest issue for the next two years, you will lose the midterms.
And when you have people like Randy Fine and Lindsey Graham and Nikki Haley signing their autographs on bombs, you are going to lose the midterms.
That type of behavior should be ridiculed and cast out of any political party.
If you are such a psychotic freak that wants to put your signature on a bomb that's used to kill people, if you're in the military, I'm not talking about you.
I'm talking about politicians.
Any political party should reject that.
And yet, what do you get?
You get a foreign flag all over your Congress and you have congressmen and women that sign bombs.
That's bad politics.
That's bad optics.
You will lose if you continue this.
Trump is not on the ticket in the midterms.
But if you make it about Israel, you will lose.
You will lose.
And you can throw mud and start name-calling and reject this.
And then when you see a victory like last night, you're going to say, what happened?
How could it be?
Well, that's because you're not listening to the voices of reason that are actually telling you what's happening.
So here's, let's look at the buildup to this and some of the clips, and it's the good, it's the bad.
Let's first start with.
This was on the debate stage.
It's one of the most viral clips from the debates and from the election cycle here in clip 12.
Given the hostility and the anti-Semitism that has been shown in New York, I would go to Israel.
Mr. Tilson, where would you go?
I'd make my fourth trip to Israel, followed by my fifth trip to Ukraine, two of our greatest allies fighting on the front lines of the global war on terror.
I will be doing, as the mayor, I'll be standing up for Jewish New Yorkers and I'll be meeting them wherever they are across the five boroughs, whether that's in their synagogues and temples or at their homes or at the subway platform, because ultimately we need to focus on delivering on their concerns.
unidentified
Just yes or no, do you believe in a Jewish state of Israel?
My wife's life work in this area means a lot to our family, and it could coincide with my young son, Miles Bar Mitzvah, if you'd like to have his bar mitzvah.
But if you're not willing to recognize that factor and you ignore that factor, you're going to lose the midterms.
And maybe there's another way to put it that might be easier for conservatives to understand.
Think about the response that you have when a politician is on a stage talking about Black Lives Matter.
Think about the response you have when a politician is on the stage talking about LGBTQ plus.
That's the same response now, and it's not just from the left, it's from a lot of the left, but it's also on the new right, which we're kind of back to 2016 again, where the right is split.
They called it the alt-right then.
Ultimately, we took over the party, got Trump elected twice, three times actually.
But now you see the neocons, the conservative establishment is once again trying to throw overboard the anti-establishment right, calling you pannikins, calling you whatever.
They always have names for it.
It was the alt-right.
Now it's pannikins, you know, or they'll just call you an anti-Semite.
It's not working.
But that same response, that eye roll, that same response, that, oh, here we go again.
When you hear a politician talk about Black Lives Matter, when you hear a politician talking about gay rights, that same response is now on the majority of the left and a minority on the right.
When you talk about Israel, it's the same response.
It's the eye roll.
It's the, oh, here we go.
I'm sick of it.
Call it what you want.
Seems like the word Israel fatigue is sticking.
They'll call it anti-Semitism.
That's not accurate.
And that's only going to make it worse, by the way.
It's only going to make it worse.
And that's what they're doing now is they're making it worse.
What do you think happens when you have a foreign policy dispute or just a difference of opinion on foreign policy and somebody just says, oh, wow, you're an anti-Semite?
What do you think that's going to do?
Of course, it has nothing to do with anti-Semitism.
It's a foreign policy opinion.
And you just call them an anti-Semite.
What do you think they're going to do?
It's the same effect when you called us Nazis for supporting Trump.
It's the same effect when you called everybody racist for being white.
It's the exact same thing played out just like a reverse mirror image politically aimed at the right instead of the left.
So imagine that.
You're just an average American, white, black, whatever.
You're like, yeah, you know, our foreign policy has been a disaster in the Middle East.
And I just don't think we should get involved anymore.
No, it's time that we actually step up and make clear what we are willing to do to showcase the leadership that is sorely missing in the federal administration.
How do we get our politicians because actually, because Florida's already on this?
I don't know if you've seen it.
DeSantis has already made statements trying to entice New Yorkers to come to Florida.
What a great point.
And here in Texas, it's, I don't even know.
I'll get emotional about that.
I don't live in New York.
It's upsetting for America, but it's not really like.
No, Texas is where I live.
Texas has already been debating the property taxes.
Think about that.
If Governor Abbott decided to come out and say, we'd like people from New York to come here if you want to escape the taxes, we're cutting property taxes.
And Alex had an ad set up here earlier today with a bunch of different products that were laid out.
And I forget about so many of them.
If you're a coffee drinker, we got the Alex Jones Signature Coffee 1776 blend.
Here's a bag of it right here, bold roast.
So you drink coffee, why not support us and get a nice bold coffee from our website as well?
Just a real easy way to do it.
Very high quality, very good tasting.
We got great health supplements for you as well.
You hear all the rave about our methylene blue sale that is live right now at thealxjonestore.com.
I always want to remind you to take your superfood drink mix.
That is the optimal human superfood drink mix.
Got my canister right here.
One scoop of this incredible drink mix has over 90 powerful ingredients for gut health and digestion, brain health, body balancing, adaptogens, and multiple different nutrient-rich superfoods.
Just one scoop.
It's absolutely incredible.
And right now, we also have the limited edition silver coin, the Midnight Rider themed silver coin, also live at theaxjonesstore.com.
This is limited edition.
If you are a collector of the coins, get this one before it sells out.
By the way, if you are a VIP member, you get an extra discount.
You get an extra discount when you're a VIP member on the limited edition Midnight Rider Silver Coin.
So if you want to become a VIP member, go to the alexjonestore.com slash VIP to find out about all the benefits, including but not limited to monthly membership credits, bonus entries into our raffles and giveaways right now, like the Ford F-250 Lariat, and so much more.
To find out more information, go to the alexjonestore.com slash VIP.
And remember, if you're a fan of our health products as well, you can get a huge discount up to 50% when you subscribe for auto ship.
So when you subscribe for auto ship, you get the big discount.
It's guaranteed in stock for you.
And it will auto ship so that you don't have to think about it.
You don't have to remember ordering it every month or however often you would.
So that's all happening at thealxjonestore.com.
We appreciate your continued support to keep us on the air.
And I do want to move on from this, but I got a couple hangers here.
Israel is playing an outsized role in New York City's mayoral race.
Will it matter?
Headline, June 22nd, 2025.
Well, we told you it would.
It did.
Never doubt me, folks.
Stephen Miller weighing in.
The commentary about New York City Democrats nominating an anarchist socialist for mayor omits one point.
How unchecked migration fundamentally remade the New York City electorate.
Democrats change politics by changing voters.
That's how you turn a city that defined U.S. dominance into what it is now.
Yeah, now the conversation about immigration comes back into the fold.
Do we really need to be taking a bunch of immigrants?
How do you re-evaluate that?
Do you just have a full moratorium on immigration?
Do you only take the most elites?
Do you just have people coming in with visas?
But yeah, this is a total demographic replacement.
This is a total cultural replacement.
It's all done by design.
And they try to use our good nature against us.
Say, hey, just hand over your country to anybody that wants to come in.
You don't want to be a racist now.
You don't want to be a xenophobe now.
You want to live in a third world hellhole now.
You know, rallying against socialism and communism and foreigners taking over our country, that is a winning issue.
You can win on that issue, but you will nullify it once you pledge your support for Israel.
That will nullify that as a winning issue, as you've just seen in New York City.
And you might say, well, that's not going to translate all over the country.
Well, no, but it will translate enough for the Democrats to win the House if you don't change course.
And what do you think it's like?
I'm telling you, they are doing more damage to the Republican Party than you can even realize, folks.
This populist nationalist coalition, the MAGA coalition, if they don't recognize what's happening right now and draining it, then it's not going to look good and we're basically going to have to start at 2015 all over again.
Congressman Randy Fine on Ilan Omar.
Well, look, she's a Muslim terrorist.
She's a disgrace.
I'm no fan of Ilan Omar.
She's horrible.
She's one of the worst in Congress.
How is she a terrorist?
And how is it you're able to do this?
How is it you're just able to just label somebody a terrorist if they're a Muslim or label someone a Nazi if they have a foreign policy disagreement?
You understand how many people you're turning off, specifically young people, where you've gained so much ground.
We have gained so much ground on the right politically with young people, and we're literally flushing it all down the drain now.
Flushing it all down the drain.
If I was Ilan Omar, I'd sue Randy Fine.
How is that not blatant defamation?
To call someone a terrorist that has never.
Has she been convicted of terrorism?
I've never heard of that.
Again, I'm no fan of Ilan Omar.
She sucks.
She's awful.
Is she a terrorist?
Who signed a bomb?
Who's posting about bombs away?
Who's celebrating death and destruction in the Middle East?
Well, I guess probably Ilhan Omar is too.
But you are Randy Fine.
That's what you did.
I don't know if I've ever seen Ilhan Omar saying bombs away.
I think, didn't Randy Fine sign a bomb too?
Didn't he put his John Hancock on a bomb?
I don't think Ilan's ever done that.
What's a more terroristic thing?
Talking or just signing a bomb that's about to blow somebody's head off?
We're killing ourselves with this.
We are killing ourselves with this, and we're going to lose the youth vote if this continues.
It's going to be a disaster.
And it's really unfortunate.
All the ground that we've gained politically as a coalition, it's going to be a disaster.
But, you know, listen to this.
It's if nothing else.
I mean, if Randy Fine wants to drop nukes on Gaza, this guy belongs in an institution.
Ilhan Omar belongs in Somalia, and Randy Fine belongs in an institution.
This is a guy that flies the Israeli flag higher than the American flag in his own office.
We are killing ourselves with this garbage.
It's destroying the coalition.
It's going to cost us in the midterms, and it breaks my heart.
I thought we gained so much ground.
We gained so much ground, and we're flushing it away because of horrible foreign policy that everybody can see, because of disgusting warmongers that everybody is sick of.
But again, I get back to it because I just look for logic.
They lied to you on purpose to help Israel steal more land in the Middle East, and they claim it's self-defense.
Self-defense, my ass.
It's a goddamn genocide.
And yes, Muslim lives matter.
We're also human beings.
The only human beings on this planet aren't Israelis.
They're not some special benighted superhumans.
Oh my God, if they die, we all have to say, oh, we bow down to you.
But if Muslims die, right?
That's what American media does.
That's what American politicians do.
I'm so sick of our lives not mattering.
I'm so sick of it.
I'm so sick of everyone has to grovel to Israel.
But the minute you ask someone, can you be a decent human being and care about the Palestinians?
They go, angry Semite, no, F you.
You're the one who hates Muslims.
And American media, you are guilty.
You're the ones who got the whole country my whole life to hate me, to hate my Muslim family, to hate all Muslims across the world.
You're the sick sons of bitches that called us terrorists when it was Israel attacking, when it was Israel taking land, when it was Israel slaughtering and slaughtering.
How many times?
Every war, Israel kills 100 times the civilians.
This time they kill a thousand times the civilians.
Doesn't count.
Doesn't count.
What does the American media say in their infinite racism?
And there were some scandals earlier, let's say, about some fake news reports about developments in the Diddy trial today that I wanted him to give us an update on.
And I know that he would probably love to lay into me on a foreign policy dispute.
But unfortunately for him, it's his birthday and he's got a dinner date with his wife.
So I think he's only going to have time for the Diddy issue.
And we'll probably have to bounce him, unfortunately, before we can have a foreign policy conversation.
We'll see, though.
He may just railroad the Diddy segment and get right into it.
All right.
Good logic joining me now.
Let's start with the fake news that came out today that the charges were going to be dropped.
It went pretty viral.
It sustained for a couple of hours.
Some people were trying to correct it, but you know how these things go.
They just spread like wildfire and people jump onto it.
You have to understand that there's this is the second superseding indictment.
So first it was an indictment charge, then there was a second, there's a superseding indictment, then there was a second superseding indictment, which is what we're currently operating under that current set of operations.
That's the world we're living in for purposes of this trial.
There are five charges that we started with, and there are still five charges today.
The first charge is RICO.
The second is for sex trafficking under 18 USC 1591.
The fourth one is another sex trafficking of a different woman.
The first one was Cassie Pentura.
The second one is acting under the pseudonym of Jane.
And then we have two, we have the third and fifth charges are related to interstate transportation for purposes of prostitution.
But the real key focus here for purposes of today is the RICO charge.
In order to establish RICO, you need to prove that there's a criminal enterprise which has been engaging for a prolonged period of time in multiple different types of crimes.
And the RICO charge goes into great detail as to the different nature of different crimes that could help substantiate a RICO conviction.
And there's a whole list of like dozens of different types of charges that someone could theoretically commit as part of an enterprise that could lead to a conviction under RICO.
Now, with respect to Diddy in particular, there were eight different charges, potential charges that the state wanted to start with under this newest superseding indictment and say, these are eight different crimes that we feel this criminal enterprise with Diddy at the helm has committed during the past 10 years.
And accordingly, that if we get, if the jury finds him liable for committing two of these, that would support the RICO charge and be able to get him this minimum period of 10 years maximum of life, which is the penalty for RICO.
So they had eight different types of charges.
And during, and right now, we just, we wrapped up yesterday, all the testimony.
We're done with that.
The state closed yesterday.
The defense had a very limited defense with no witnesses and just submitting some exhibits to try and substantiate the lack of credibility of some of the witnesses, including Cassie Bentura.
And then they rested.
And today they're trying to sort out how the jury charges are going to be framed.
This is something most laypeople cannot appreciate, just the magnitude of how important the wording of the jury charges can be.
A difference of a word here or there can literally make all the difference as to whether or not someone gets convicted and spends years, if not life in prison, depending on whether or not that a particular charge is more broadly framed so that you can more easily find them convictable or more narrowly tailored.
So this is something that prosecutors and defense attorneys will routinely argue about a great deal.
Well, yesterday, excuse me, yesterday, there was one other thing that happened after the state arrested and before the defense went, which is we saw that there was a Rule 29 application that was brought by the defense.
And I'm going into a little legal heavy here.
If you want me to sort of dial it back and talk a little more broadly, I can.
But the Rule 29 application is basically like a motion to dismiss the criminal charge where the judge says, even if I give all the credence in the world to the credibility of the witnesses and the evidence that was presented by the state, there's just not enough legally there to convict.
So I can't let a jury weigh this over and ultimately potentially convict him on something they can't legally convict him for.
Now, Rule 29 applications are routinely denied.
The defense attorneys must bring them, even though they know it's going to be denied, because that's what preserves your ability to appeal.
When you appeal afterwards, you're not appealing from the conviction of the jury.
You're appealing from this denial of the Rule 29 application to dismiss.
Anyway, so when they spelled out their basis, why do we think this has to be dismissed?
As being brought up on screen there, they went through all these different A charges and they were saying that the kidnapping and the arson and they went through the other charges also, the bribery and the sex trafficking and the forced labor.
And the defense laid out how it is that the state failed here, failed there, failed here, failed there.
And apparently it seems as if the state itself is worried on those three that I highlighted in red there, that with respect to the kidnapping and the arson and the sex trafficking, that if in fact they would leave that in the jury charges, it seems that they have concerns that ultimately that could lead to a reversal on appeal and say that because under California,
New York state law, the evidence that was presented during the course of this trial doesn't substantiate that he's legally liable for kidnapping or for arson or for the sex trafficking.
And that's the most astonishing part of this is the sex trafficking because that's 18 USC 1591 and they still are going after him for the trafficking.
I think it seems as if we can't know exactly what discussions happen back and forth, but ultimately the state themselves conceded that they're no longer pursuing those three charges that I Highlight in red, kidnapping, arson, and trafficking as a justifiable basis to convict on Rico.
So they're pulling it out of the jury charges.
So the jury won't be considering that as a basis to convict him for Rico.
Well, it's not, it's an intuitive question that you're asking.
And in general, and I'm not a criminal defense attorney, but I've been practicing on the civil side for two and a half decades.
And I've spoken, I've covered enough criminal cases to know that when we're dealing with the prosecutors, what they tend to do is they will overcharge and charge as much as they possibly can for leverage purposes.
As the case proceeds, though, and you're actually able to see what evidence they have, I think they feel it's shrewder on their part, once we're getting now to an actual jury deliberation, for them to narrow in and zone in on the things that they think they feel most confident they can land, rather than having the jury get frustrated and saying like, this is not there, this is not there, and start going through this snowball effect and saying the same way he didn't commit arson and burn Kid Cuddy's car.
There's not enough evidence of that.
I also don't believe that he engaged in the tampering or the other stuff.
So it's a tactical move by the state where they feel this is their best way of securing the conviction.
That's how I would interpret this.
I don't think it's unusual for them to trim the fact at this point.
You've summed it up quite sufficiently, I would say, for anybody that was confused.
Because when I saw the reports coming, people were sending it to me.
I said, well, hold on a second.
Then eventually we found out, no, the initial reporting was wrong.
And then I guess, you know, because I already wanted to get you on before the trial was going to come to a conclusion anyway, since you've been following this.
So, okay.
So we've addressed that then.
What is the current status?
They said they wanted to have this thing done before July 4th.
They're not going to be in court tomorrow, correct?
I expect to be hanging out down in downtown New York because it's a bit of a drag to try to get from my home to the court in time.
So they'll usually announce that, hey, there's a verdict coming back in and then you have like a half hour to get there, but I would never make it.
So I'm probably going to end up going to find myself there so I can be there at the denouement when we actually reach a conclusion here.
I'm expecting that's probably going to be Monday or Tuesday.
The sooner it comes in, the faster it comes in, the more likely I would think that we're going to be looking at a whole bunch of acquittals here because the vibe around the courthouse.
So there's five charges, and I'll break it down like this.
The easiest one for me to say I cannot imagine them getting a conviction on is charge number four, which is the sex trafficking charges as it relates to Jane.
That I think that their case there is so is on such legs, on such thin legs.
They're like wobbling there.
Because sex trafficking basically means that you forced someone, there's a compulsion forced or coerced them to engage in commercial sex.
And there was just so little evidence that he did anything to force her and so much evidence of her referring to Diddy as my partner, my lover.
In the sense that it was undercutting a claim of her being compelled rather than someone making really stupid choices.
You know what I'm saying?
Like that she fell into, she fell.
I'm not passing judgment on our choices other than to say it's leading you down this path.
So then you end up there.
You can't say I was forced.
You decide if you're making decisions along the way and you get there, you're not forced.
That's in stark contrast to charge number two as it relates to Cassie Ventura in the sense that Cassie Ventura is testifying about multiple incidents where he's beating the heck out of her, pulling around by her hair, blackmailing her, sending Emails, hey, mom, I just want to give you a heads up that for Christmas, Diddy might be making public these sex vids of me.
Even that just came up a couple of months ago for the first time ever.
The state never heard of it until a couple of months ago.
It's a very flimsy charge.
So I think that one is very weak.
The RICO charges, what we saw today makes me really question the viability of this RICO charge.
And I think, and that's another thing that I think we can take away from today, because once you take out these three, now you're dealing with forced labor, which, you know, the state with the defense in their Article 29 motion to dismiss yesterday, they pointed out correctly that these employees who he treats like garbage and he treats them like, he curses them.
He makes them work four hours, four days straight without sleep.
Otherwise, you're fired.
Otherwise, you're fired.
But that's not forced labor if you're able to leave.
Forced labor is like, you know, you picture the kids in chains, you know, working the fields or their little fingers in some Chinese warehouse.
That's what forced labor, or God forbid, you know, somewhere here on domestic soil.
But that's not what forced labor is when a person decides, yeah, I'm coming back to work tomorrow, even though I haven't slept in the last 48 hours.
And I'm driving back to work right now, even though I haven't slept in the last three days because Diddy's been making me run crazy.
You could quit.
It's a labor dispute.
So calling that forced labor is a very tough sell.
That's an employment issue, not a criminal issue.
And even the tampering with witnesses.
If I was the defense here, I'd be sitting here and I'd be saying, or that he's obstructing and that he's trying to buy the intercontinental video.
Here's a humiliating video of him being brutal and a monster to Cassie in a hotel, throwing her to the floor and kicking her.
That went viral.
And he basically bribed someone to buy that video off of them and try and keep it covered.
They want to say he's trying to obstruct the police and trying to tamper with evidence.
You want to tell me that his motivation is to keep from going into jail?
Maybe.
I don't know.
I think that this is a guy who definitely didn't want, even if there was no potential criminal penalty for it, I'll tell you right now, he doesn't want people seeing that video.
I mean, no one wants to see that video.
The same way they tried saying with Trump that, you know, he's he's trying to obstruct or trying to interfere with the law or try to help win an election, even though he had been buying, he had been basically keep paying people to keep quiet for the last 25 years, long before he ever ran.
It's the same type of prosecution where it's like basically a way of saying that we're going to take what you're doing now and we're going to attribute a very negative motivation for it for the purposes of trying to convict you.
And I expect to hear the defense go into great detail about that.
And the most important element here that I think that we're going to see them, they're going to see the defense really pound home on is the mens rea, which is the Latin term for intent, that even if he's doing certain things that are affecting people, if Diddy doesn't realize that he's had, that he's, yeah, he's forcing you to do it.
In that case, you cannot convict him.
He has to have the mensrea, the intent to actually be committing some of these elements in order to be convicted.
So I'm not going to tell you that he's walking.
I certainly am not bold enough to say that he's walking.
I'll tell you that I do, I'd be very disappointed in this jury if they convict him on count number four.
I can very easily see them convict him on count number two because he was very blatant in trying to force Cassie to basically be his sex slave.
100%, which they can't do if he gets convicted on the trafficking or the RICO.
So even though let's face it, he's Diddy.
He's not me.
If this guy goes to federal prison, it's going to be club-fed.
Okay.
Diddy's life is going to be okay.
But the reality is no one wants to be forced to do that.
They don't have to.
And I think he's got a pretty, he has a reasonable chance of getting out of some, if not all of these charges.
I'm definitely, I don't want to predict anything, but I'll tell you, number four, my money would be on acquittal on that one.
Number one, the RICO, that one I'd say is 50-50.
And the number two, sex trafficking of Cassie, that one I think it's probably like 70-30 in favor of the states.
That's my read.
But the longer this thing goes, all you need is one juror in there who basically is like, F this free Diddy.
And if they're screaming that over and over again and the rest of the jurors don't care, that could end up carrying the day.
It really could.
So that's why you can't, that's why you look like an idiot if you try predicting what a jury is going to do when you have no idea the mindset of any of these jurors and who's going to be the dominant voice in that jury room amongst what is normally a sea of people who are moderately indifferent about the outcome.
Well, I guess that could be a segue if we wanted one.
Diddy's attorneys could allegedly argue that Homeland Security should focus on the escalating conflict with Iran, not what Diddy is doing with baby oil.
Well, maybe we could send Diddy in there with baby oil and that might take care of all the issues.
Well, look, you know, I know you've been very outspoken on X. I've been following you on X on the foreign policy dispute that's going on right now.
If you want to take a second to wade into that or if you want to respond to the shocking results of the mayor's primary last night, I see you have the NYPD hat on.
You told me we were having a good hair day, so I find it ironic that the hat makes the appearance instead.
I've had a lot of people reach out that don't like my debate on foreign policy.
I actually enjoy debate and considering you're from the legal world.
I know that you don't shy away from it either.
And I think it's a big debate.
I think it's a big debate.
I think it's a fair debate.
And I think, too, my interpretation of it, regardless of where we might stand on foreign policy debates right now, I feel like it's a generational issue.
I think that's a fair, broad assessment that I think that the older you are, the more concerned you are about the possibility of a terrorist coming and bringing a nuke into your, you know, walking across your border, as opposed to, I think that the younger you are, the more likely you are to basically say that's never going to happen to me or anyone I know or care about.
So I think that that is possible.
And it's possible.
And I would think it's fair to say that both of them are perhaps overstating their position and too deeply entrenched and not considering the alternative.
Meaning that if you grew up in the 80s and you're used to the idea of Russia being like a continual nuclear threat, perhaps we are and watching all these movies, you know, and Hollywood producing stuff about let's stop the bad guys from bringing nukes or from blowing up the world.
So in that case, perhaps you are more in that type of sphere and you're a little too concerned about it.
Whereas I think young people today, and you know, which is common for people who are younger, is that they're sort of just completely oblivious and they don't realize the reality of the dangers of the world because they just haven't experienced.
They think everyone thinks like them.
In other words, it's very hard for any person, any human, myself, and anyone else to try and step out of what our own perception is and look at the perspective of other people.
One of the things that frustrated me about the last few days, and I know we only have like a minute left, one of the things that really frustrated me is that I felt as if a lot of people who never really considered the distinctions between a Middle Eastern mindset and a Middle Eastern mindset applies to both Jews and Arabs, Israelis and Arabs.
Their mindset and approach to how they deal with things is very, very different from the way you and I as American and Westerners think.
I think Trump has a better understanding as to where they're coming from and that we're really selling him short and assuming that, oh, BB is some Jewish Fengali who's able to mesmerize him into doing what he wants.
Trump is not a sucker.
Okay.
Trump understands.
I know he makes bad choices sometimes on who it is that he surrounds himself with.
But this guy has helped handle foreign policy against dignitaries from, and now this is in his second administration.
His first administration, one of the reasons he's the best president in living memory, not the last century or beyond, you can make it ever, you can make that case, is that his foreign policy is spot on every single time, whether he's dealing with North Korea, the Middle East, Russia, one by one.
Enjoy your date with your lovely wife tonight before the breadlines start.
All right, still got a bunch of big news to cover here, including a statement from President Trump with an announcement.
Short segment here.
I want to fill it with this.
It's surely funny when you get these leftists and these liberals at a congressional hearing, and then you force them to consume their own logic, and it goes horribly wrong.
And so here's an example.
Brandon Gill, they introduced this black supremacist as a witness to talk about the plight of black, well, I guess it's white racism against blacks, however they want to spin it, you know how it is.
And so Representative Gill wanted to question him on where he really stands on, let's say, racism.
And boy, oh boy, probably went exactly like you might think here in Clip 20.
He does believe that people should be treated differently because of their skin color, but of course that would be admitting that he's the real racist, so he can't say that.
And what I believe is that the demographic composition of workplaces are Congress ought to reflect the diversity of the racial demographic composition.
If two different children are applying for college, let's say one is white and one is black, and there's one slot available, should they be evaluated based on the same objective criteria, test scores, for instance?
Eastern at the Pentagon in order to fight for the dignity of our great American pilots.
These pilots were very upset.
After 36 hours of dangerously flying through enemy territory, they landed.
They knew the success was legendary.
And then two days later, they started reading fake news by CNN and the failing New York Times.
They felt terribly.
Fortunately for them, and as usual, solely for the purpose of demeaning President Trump, the fake news, New York Times and CNN lied and totally misrepresented the facts, none of which they had because it was too soon.
There were no facts out yet.
The news conference will prove both interesting and irrefutable in joy.
Irrefutable.
Interesting and irrefutable.
Wow.
So, hey, look, whatever the case is, there is no doubt that the pilots, the men and women on this mission, I'm sure, are just absolutely spectacular.
I'm sure it was an absolutely spectacular and legendary mission.
I have no doubt about that.
The truth about the facilities, as we covered in the first hour, you know, I would say trust President Trump.
I trust President Trump more than Iran or Israel.
But there's no doubt there seemed this is not normal White House confidence and activity around a certain subject.
I mean, there's fake news out there all the time.
But that'll be interesting.
So tomorrow they say irrefutable evidence.
But of course, we already know, as Trump has stated, he's worked with backdoor deals with Iran to cool off tensions, do a de-escalatory show of force.
So it could be another instance like that.
And we shall see what happens tomorrow morning.
Okay, before we get into the rest of the news here, a reminder to support us by shopping at thealxjonstore.com.
It's your support there that keeps us on the air.
And, you know, maybe most importantly as well, not just us on the air, but it keeps us independent.
It keeps us independent.
We are beholden to you in the audience, and that is it.
No special interests, no big donors, no big companies, nothing like that.
Just you in the audience.
And I'd say with the major last couple of weeks, Infowars has delivered.
And it's really strange.
It really is like 2015, 2016 all again with the right now, where I thought the right had a massive populist coalition that we could move forward with.
And now it's like right back to the 2015-16 dividing lines.
So it's kind of funny.
I'm getting off base here, but it's kind of funny as I look back on it That here we are again.
The same people that were against Trump are now the same people that are only Trump.
So it went from never Trump to only Trump.
And we spent two years in 2015 and 16 to get Trump across the finish line victoriously.
Then we spent 2017 to really to 2025, you could say, defeating the left politically, culturally, having major victories.
And now it's like we're right back now with the right-wing establishment, neocon warmongers falling for all the propaganda.
And it's like, oh, now we're going back against them.
So just kind of a crazy phenomenon we're going through here.
Either way, we appreciate your support at thealixjonestore.com.
We really want to say thank you to our VIP members.
It's that sustained membership that really funds us and budgets us into the future.
Sometimes sales are great, sometimes not so much, but the sustained VIP membership budgets us into the future.
We really appreciate that.
Thealixjonestore.com slash VIP.
Benefits include, but not limited to, monthly membership credits, exclusive monthly VIP only giveaways, free shipping over $99, automatic double entries into all of our raffles and giveaways, and so much more.
Figure it all out.
Learn more at thealxjonstore.com slash VIP.
And if you are collecting all of our limited edition silver coins, you get a special discounted rate on the Midnight Rider limited edition silver coin on sale right now at thealxjonstore.com.
Yeah, I know within three or four people who are going to pick.
I mean, he goes out pretty soon, fortunately, because I think he's terrible.
We have no inflation.
We have a tremendous economy.
Hundreds of billions of dollars of tariff money is pouring in.
Factories are being built because they don't want to pay the tariffs, so they're building them all over the country.
I think we're close to $15 trillion.
I told you $5.1 trillion from the Middle East alone, but of investment money coming in.
There's never been anything like that in the history of our country.
But we have no inflation.
And we have borrowing because Biden, stupidly, they did short-term debt.
So we have borrowing coming up.
And, you know, we'll go 10 years, maybe longer, maybe shorter, but we'll go a long period of time when we do the debt.
And because of him, because of this guy, we will have to pay for years.
We'll be paying for him.
And I said to him, listen, there's no inflation.
He says, but maybe there'll be some.
That's true.
I said, if there is some, what you do is raise the rate.
I'm okay with that.
You raise the rate in two years from now or in a year from now.
But because the rate's high, we have to pay more for debt.
It's pretty equal.
In other words, if it's 4%, it's 4%.
If you drop it a point, you'll pay 3%.
So it's fairly equal, not necessarily, but fairly equal.
So we're going to end up paying maybe two points or three points more.
Three points would be about $900 billion a year because of this very average mentally person.
He's an average mentally person.
I'd say low in terms of what he does, low, low IQ for what he does, okay?
Wait, so instead of paying $900 billion, we don't want to pay $900 just because he doesn't want to lower the rate.
I said, if there's inflation in two years or three years or one year from now, you raise the rate and you take care of the inflation, among other things.
I'd love to hear an argument for why Powell cut rates 50 points right before an election, but can't do it now with inflation lower.
Yes, well, another Trump saboteur, another anti-Trump deep state hatchet man.
Jerome Powell.
I don't know why Trump puts up with him.
Maybe he's giving him one last chance before he decides to fire him.
But I'd be done with him.
All right.
So, Joy Reed.
This is a woman who, if nothing else, is hilarious to watch attempt political commentary.
She unceremoniously loses her show at MSNBC.
Huge budget show, but wasn't worth a dime, so they cut her.
And then I think she might have even blamed racism.
Who knows?
She thought it.
Well, she's back.
Somehow, I guess she got a good PR person, and she was able to get a couple of hits, one on the Breakfast Club talk radio show podcast, and then she got some time on CNN.
So I don't know if that's going to become a regular thing.
But nonetheless, Joy Reid is back.
And she is providing us with unintentional comedy, the likes of which the best comedians couldn't write a script for the movies.
So let's see where we should start.
Here's a debate on a CNN panel with Joy Reed and Arthur Adala.
Once that starts going up in the other direction, and the tax base has gone, and sanitation has gone, now there's two things to understand here about the leftist mindset of these two women, but it's most of them.
They don't even understand the basic economics.
So he has to explain this is what's going to happen with his monetary policy, his fiscal policy.
So he explains that.
They have nothing to say.
But then if you notice what Abby Phillips chimes in with, she says, hey, we're already taxing him at 50%.
Trump is the apprentice guy, not the billionaire business icon.
And because the Trump administration is pinky in the brain, now anybody could run.
Now, the funny thing is there's a little element of truth to that, that Donald Trump has broken the door wide open for anybody to get into politics if they want.
If you have charisma and you're not afraid of the media and you take on the corruption head on, then yeah, anybody can get involved.
Trump has definitely changed that, but it's not because of his, quote, pinky and the brain administration.
Which that show actually had a lot of red pills in it, but I digress.
Imagine thinking Donald Trump and Zoran Abdami are at the same level of life and business experience.
Wow.
Impressive.
It's actually impressive to be that stupid.
I don't think you listening to this, I don't think you could try to be that stupid.
I don't think if you tried, you wouldn't succeed.
All right, one more.
And this is truly, this is why Democrats and leftists in the modern liberal progressive sense, this is why they're so dangerous because they really mean it when they say something like this in clip 26.
All right, President, he was a great wingman for President Obama.
But as you know, as president, again, I had some policy differences with him, but I would still take him if his brain is mush today over Donald Trump.
I'll be honest.
I can't understand a thing Trump says.
And the difference between Trump and Biden is that Trump is also incoherent, says stupid shit every day, but Fox cuts down his incoherent babble into what sounds like normal speech.
She wants to be able to say that Jews killed Jesus.
Well, whether you believe that or not, shouldn't you be allowed to say that?
Why shouldn't you be allowed to say that?
Interesting.
And the more you fight this fight, and the more you tell people they can't criticize Israel, and the more you tell people you can't say this, you can't say that, you can't say Jews, kill Jesus, you're only having the opposite effect of what it is that you're trying to do.
If it is what you're really trying to do, stop anti-Semitism.
You're only making it worse.
And it is.
It's worse than it's ever been.
There's no doubt about that.
And it's only going to, it's like a game of ping pong.
It's like one of those games of ping pong.
You ever seen it?
And they get like 10 feet behind the table and then it's like 15 feet.
It's like crazy.
That's what it's like.
So it's like you start and you're both kind of touching the table and then as the thing goes on, it just gets farther and farther.
That's where it's at now.
So yeah, the more you cry anti-Semitism for a foreign policy debate and the more you try to censor people's free speech to say Jews killed Jesus or you can say Muslims killed Jesus or whatever you want.
So the more you try to censor speech and the more you attack people for a foreign policy debate, the worse it's going to get.
And it's going to become, as I predicted yesterday and was proven right, it's going to reach the voting booth.
And it's not going to be limited to New York City.
It's not going to be limited to a mayor's race.
It will reach the voting booth in the midterms and beyond.
Do not doubt me on that.
All right, final segment of today's transmission.
Folks, remember, happening right now at thealxjonesstore.com.
Buy one methylene blue.
Get one free.
Limited sale happening right now while supplies last at thealexjonesstore.com.
Thank you for your continued support to keep us on air at thealxjonstore.com.
And we really appreciate it when you guys call in and send us messages about how much you like the products at the store.
All right.
Let's look at these two videos.
I think we can get through it all.
This MEP from Spain, Irene Montero, has been going viral multiple times.
And now the Israel debate is even taking over European politics.
It's bleeding into the NATO situation as well and why Spain wants to be removed from NATO.
And I wouldn't be surprised if the Italians start to express similar sentiment.
Of course, this doesn't bother me one bit because I feel there is no use for NATO anymore anyway other than to steal all of our money.
So I'll read the captions here.
in Spanish from MEP of Spain, Irene Monteiro, in clip 6.
unidentified
He financed groups of terrorist groups in the Middle East, who has dedicated to organizing coups of state in different countries in Latin America, who has been two years financing them.
So she's talking about because America supports Israel and because what America supports in Gaza through Israel, that they don't want to be attached to America through NATO anymore.
So let's just go ahead.
No, it's fine, guys.
The captions in this are about as bad as they get anyway.
We've reported on it, so people understand.
So this is an ongoing sentiment out of Spain.
And this is why Spain is, as Trump addressed earlier today, refusing to pay their fair share into NATO.
So regardless of how you feel about the whole Israel-Gaza thing and America's involvement in that, Spain is looking at that and saying, well, we're not going to put more into NATO because we don't support that.
So, hey, if this leads to the eventual dissolvement of NATO, I'm okay with that.
I'm okay with that.
Maybe we can do better here with the Italian government, Angelo Bonelli.
Or you know what?
Maybe.
Did you want to listen to an Italian rant for 60 seconds in Italian?
Could just do that.
It's kind of fun, right?
It probably expands your IQ, your consciousness to hear foreign languages anyway.
I don't know.
I've always found that listening to music from foreign countries, listening to music in different languages always seems to expand my consciousness.
So maybe we just listen to him rant in Italian.
And if you're listening, enjoy.
If you're watching, you can read the captions.
But here you go.
So he's condemning, he's condemning the fact that the just elected, I forget her name.
What's that blonde's name who just got elected?
Georgia Maloney.
Thank you, crew.
Condemning her because she won't condemn what's happening in Gaza.
clip five I'm just going to let him go Concluda Concluda I'm
inorridated, indignated.
The hypocrisy.
A hypocrisy that does not have the courage of condemned criminal standing.
Malays, however, bambini, not the corruption of condemnaries, and the minister of the government in Netanyahu, which bombards the frontier of directors, what is the government of Israel?
This two francs and hypocrisy that the Italian is secure of interpretation majority of the Italian population, which we see the first condition,
sanctions that bambini, acquired a population, sanctions, sanctions that Belarusia and the diploma because political manteneri non-inimigarse Israel, non-inimigar Washington, comprarre army deloro, vendre army Israel.
So that's what it sounds like to be a FIFA soccer referee in the Italian Series One League.
That's what you have to hear when you're just trying to ref a game and make a call.
All right, well, all kidding aside, the story remains, folks.
And you just don't get it in Western media.
Like I said, the only network is fake news as it is, but hey, look, if a liar is telling you the truth, I understand why you might not want to believe it, but if a liar is telling you the truth, it's still the truth.
The only network that's been doing fair coverage of the Middle East developments and Israeli world relations is CNN.
It's just true.
I've been monitoring them all.
It's the only place where you can really get any neutral reporting there.
And so it's just true because of, in my view, Netanyahu's leadership, the world has turned against Israel.
Europe has turned against Israel.
You're seeing it happen in America right now.
Now, the damage control is on.
I'm not even going to read the Trump Truth Social that came out.
Basically, just, oh my gosh.
I mean, you want to talk about fawning over Netanyahu.
And I'm not going to get into this game because It's this stupid immature game that people are playing now with the back and forth over the division.
See, Trump is not about Israel.
Trump doesn't like Netanyahu.
See, you stupid idiots.
See, you pannikins.
Did you see Trump's true social post?
I mean, you want to talk about praising Netanyahu.
That's about as the greatest endorsement Netanyahu's probably ever had in the world.
He just got from Trump.
So, but again, I won't get into that.
I don't even want to read it.
It's so gay.
So all Israel really has at this point is the support from the United States of America.
And that is obviously dwindling.
And, you know, I got this other report.
This is a American doctor, Pearl Mutter, also happens to be Jewish.
He went to provide medical aid in the Gaza Strip.
Well, this was his testimony in clip eight.
unidentified
You're saying that children in Gaza are being shot by snipers.
I have two children that I have photographs of that were shot so perfectly in the chest I couldn't put my stethoscope over their heart more accurately.
And directly on the side of the head in the same child.
No toddler gets shot twice by mistake by the world's best sniper.
And there are dead center shots.
All of the disasters I've seen combined.
Combined.
40 mission trips, 30 years, ground zero, earthquakes.
All of that combined doesn't equal the level of carnage that I saw against civilians in just my first week in Gaza.
unidentified
And when you say civilians, is it mostly children?
And nobody's talking about it as much anymore with what's happening in Iran, but it's still ongoing.
By the way, Syria that was toppled, which was an Israeli foreign policy issue for years, they finally accomplished it, led to the result of hundreds, if not thousands, of Christians dying.
Then there was the terror attack at the St. Elias Church.
Suicide bomber showed up, blew it up.
They were having funerals in Syria for that.
So it's just, I don't know.
I always land on the same conclusion that I try to get expressed in support of, which is, hey, no matter how you feel about it, America has to get out, man.
Period.
We have to get out.
This region of the world is torn apart by hate and war.
And now it's here.
Now it's here.
It's the most unfortunate thing that we have now imported the hate and the war of the Middle East.
She seems to know an awful lot about California gang activity.
She's even speaking in their language.
Now, think logically about it, beyond the fact she seems to know way too much about it.
Oh, you mean the criminal gangs that likely engage in criminal activity on a daily basis?
You're telling them that the feds are coming to town and you want them to come out and show their face.
Is that what you're saying?
You're asking criminal gang members, your peep, holding down the block.
You're asking them to come out and expose themselves in a public standoff against federal law enforcement.
Gee, sounds like an offer they're really going to be excited to take up.
Oh, yes.
I'm sure they're throwing on their gang colors right now to stand up against ICE so they can get arrested.
Yeah, that makes sense.
I'm also sure that the illegal alien gangs that are coming in from south of the border, the Mexican gangs, the cartel operatives that are coming into their territory, I'm sure they're really excited and willing to open their arms and maybe give them a section of their block too.
What an offer you to make, apparently to your friends, to come out and help you fight against federal law enforcement because it's their hood, it's their block, that they're going to sacrifice to the illegal alien gangs and they're going to risk it all in front of federal agents.
Meanwhile, it is Gay Pride Month and we have seemed to have forgotten this.
The poor gays.
Was there even any parade footage?
The poor gays, the poor LGBTQ pluses.
This Pride Month really just fell flat.
We're almost over it now.
It's almost gone.
So we remember some of the legendary Pride Month moments, like German soccer player Kevin Behrens, who was suspended after refusing to sign a fan's Pride jersey saying, I won't sign that gay shit.
Back when Pride Month used to be something, used to mean something.
Well, it means a little bit if you're in Atlanta.
I think we have footage of this.
Yeah, in clip 21 here.
If you guys want to put the footage up, four could be charged with hate crimes for destroying LGBTQ pride flags.
Atlanta police say.
Oh, that's not free speech?
Former.
Oh, oh, oh, I see.
So, yeah, they have the gay pride there.
They have the gay pride little street mural, and then they have the gay pride flag, and they lit it on fire.
House Democrats press conference defending abortion access.
Hakeem Jeffries on his official account streaming it live.
82 people.
Couldn't even crack 100, folks.
Couldn't even crack 100.
We could have crushed them, man.
We could have crushed them.
We could have made the Democrat Party irrelevant and inoperable forever.
We could have crushed them.
All we had to do is America first.
That's all we had to do.
You might have been able to get involved in the Middle East later on, but we just had to do it now.
They would have been crushed, man.
They would have been crushed.
But now we gave them a breath of life.
Put fuel in their tank.
No doubt about it.
All right, as we're about to sign off here.
Let's do this.
Got a couple other big news stories, but we're running out of time.
Charlotte City Council removes Tesla from list of approved EV vendors, saying it's for safety issues because the leftist terrorists keep attacking them.
So now they're trying to take them off of the market and the benefits away.
We named this new game-changing, high-quality supplement complex, ultimate life force, because that's what it does.
Now, since the carnage of COVID and the spike protein infections and everything we've seen, both from the so-called vaccines and from the man-made virus, a lot of great blood detox products that have been promoted by a lot of great scientists, a lot of great doctors.
And I have promoted those to my audience.
I have countless times ordered it for friends and family and others that had long COVID or were sick from the shots and everybody had dramatic effects.
Some people got complete reversal.
So it's really important to understand that when I tell you this is a game changer, you need to experience it for yourself.
This takes the aspects of a whole bunch of other amazing formulas that are already out there and throws them all in together.
And it just has a dramatic effect.
Now, there are a whole bunch of detoxing, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory compounds in here, but the biggest one is NAC.
Now, remember, during all the COVID hysteria, the feds, Fauci and others, tried to ban NAC, even though it's been known for decades to be incredible and all the rage.
Well, this has got high quality NAC in it, 400 milligrams.
And again, that's just part of what's in this.
This is all super concentrated.
It is the precursor to glutathione, your body's main engine to clean out its mitochondria that's so key.
It's involved in nearly every core process of cellular cleanup in your body.
And remember, the bad guys didn't want you to have it.
So it is so important with all the things in our environment, all the things that are going on to periodically detox, but not just for your blood health.
This is so good for your whole body overall.
So secure your ultimate life force today at thealexonstore.com.
And for a limited time, if you subscribe to it, you lock in 50% off on your next order.