Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
Please stand by for further details. | ||
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
All right, ladies and gentlemen, it is Tuesday, May 27th, 2025. | ||
This is the Infowars War Room, the fastest three hours on the Internet. | ||
And, you know, it's a long weekend, and so we are overloaded. | ||
I mean, I have too many stacks on my desk. | ||
I got stacks I still need to go through. | ||
But let me just tell you what we got coming up. | ||
We are going to hear from Trump over the weekend who was discussing some of the ins and outs of the bill and some of the other things going on in D.C. over the long holiday weekend. | ||
He was addressing the media outside of Air Force One. | ||
So we're going to play some of that audio. | ||
To just kind of get us back into the swing of things. | ||
And who knows, maybe we'll hear from Trump before the end of the show. | ||
He likes to do that. | ||
He likes to pop in here and give us some live feed. | ||
But all kinds of different ins and outs when it comes to D.C. Now, we've been watching this coordinated effort with Jake Tapper and the mainstream media now. | ||
Pivot on the whole Biden situation and say, oh my goodness, he really did have dementia. | ||
He really did have cancer. | ||
They really did lie to us. | ||
We were deceived. | ||
We were duped. | ||
Oh yes, you're the victims here. | ||
Well, you have to understand how corrupt politics works. | ||
It was always a bait and switch. | ||
Just like when they sent Joe Biden out there for the presidential debates, the earliest presidential debate in any president. | ||
Debate history and U.S. history. | ||
It was all a bait and switch. | ||
It was all by design. | ||
They sent Joe Biden out there so he would fail, so that they could remove him and replace him with Kamala, play the shell game, steal another election, have their fake primary process. | ||
Democrats haven't had a real primary since 2008. | ||
They just rig it. | ||
The point is there was a purpose. | ||
The whole sending Joe Biden out there to debate and lose was a purpose to remove him. | ||
Well, it's the exact same thing with this cancer diagnosis. | ||
It's the exact same thing. | ||
So we'll talk about the purpose on that. | ||
And then there's some other news coming out of the FBI today with some other investigations that are being opened up. | ||
But look, if I sat here and had to prioritize all of this, it wouldn't make any sense the way the FBI is handling it other than it looks like PR to me. | ||
It looks like... | ||
So now they're doing these PR pushes and they're saying, well, look at these other little cutlets over here that you like. | ||
Oh, look at the White House. | ||
Cocaine. | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
Whoop-de-doo. | ||
The Rovers, Wade, Dobbs, Supreme Court leak. | ||
We'll get down to that. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Yeah, that's, yeah. | ||
Now, maybe the January 6th pipe bomber is a little more serious, but it seems like they're throwing this stuff out there, looking for some good press after the disastrous interview, which, it's not fair to say it was a disaster. | ||
There were some good things in the interview, but telling us Epstein killed himself. | ||
I mean, you've got an auto-pen debacle right now. | ||
Trump has called it treasonous. | ||
I think he's right. | ||
So you've got the biggest criminal forgery in the history of the United States of America with the Biden auto-pen. | ||
And who's being arrested? | ||
Who's being investigated? | ||
Well, we don't have any answers. | ||
We're hearing stuff in the House, but since when has that ever gotten us anywhere? | ||
Since when have any House investigations given us any fruit? | ||
So I feel like they see the bad PR now, and so they're trying to get good PR, and they're saying, oh, but these other little things we're looking at. | ||
So we'll talk about that. | ||
And then... | ||
We do this every once in a while on Mondays, but I have a larger point to make when we look at some of this violence over this long weekend. | ||
It's really unfortunate. | ||
Oh, oh, and then a couple other hate-to-say-I-told-you-sos today, specifically the one about spying going on with the Trump administration and Pete Hegseth specifically. | ||
There's some other stories in the news today that are going to give us a little more light on that. | ||
Some AI news. | ||
Some geopolitical news. | ||
I mean, we're loaded. | ||
Three hours. | ||
Fastest on the internet. | ||
It starts now. | ||
You know, let's start it out like this. | ||
Because this is still the context, I think, in which all political coverage needs to be understood. | ||
Because people might talk about how politics is crazier than ever. | ||
Well, what is that? | ||
What is that? | ||
Why do we see this? | ||
Why do we see the extreme left or the extreme right? | ||
All these new political paradigms, debates, this alternative media? | ||
Well, when you understand this, you understand the why. | ||
Dealing with the nationwide court injunctions, and there's a bunch of different stories that you can use here, but for the sake of this, and for the sake of time as well, we'll just use this example. | ||
We're talking about nationwide court injunctions. | ||
Biden had 14 in four years. | ||
Clinton had 12 in eight years. | ||
Obama had 12 in eight years. | ||
George W. Bush had six in eight years. | ||
Trump has had 64 in four years and five months. | ||
64. So why is that? | ||
Well, Trump is obviously the outlier here. | ||
Trump is obviously, if you're looking at What is that? | ||
That's Donald Trump actually trying to be the President of the United States. | ||
That's Donald Trump, actually his own man, making his own decisions, whether you agree or not. | ||
That's what this is. | ||
This is Donald Trump running to be the president of the United States, winning against the corrupt political machine, winning against the odds, changing the entire... | ||
No, that's indicating Trump is the real deal. | ||
He's not just another member of the corrupt political class going in there and doing the normal stuff. | ||
He's his own man. | ||
He's trying to be the President of the United States. | ||
So then, okay, you understand that concept, whether you agree with President Trump and what he's doing or not. | ||
That's the lens that you have to view everything else through. | ||
Now, there's all kinds of different proofs. | ||
You could look at the media coverage. | ||
You could look at the charges he has to go through. | ||
You could look at the court injunctions we just covered. | ||
The attacks. | ||
I mean, it just goes on and on and on. | ||
But that's the context that people have to understand. | ||
And when you understand that, everything else makes sense. | ||
Now, the left struggles with this because they want to claim to be anti-establishment. | ||
They're not. | ||
They are the establishment. | ||
Trump is now representative of the anti-establishment. | ||
Maybe he's kind of taken over the establishment or become the establishment, maybe not in a negative way, just because of the political force that he is. | ||
But for the left to admit that that's the case with Trump would be to just completely shatter their entire political paradigm. | ||
So they can't do it. | ||
So they're living this lie. | ||
They're going completely crazy. | ||
Now they're attacking Elon Musk and they've lost their minds entirely. | ||
But okay. | ||
Then that's kind of the outlier. | ||
Now you get back into the politics as normal when it comes to The Biden presidential debate debacle is a perfect example. | ||
They put Biden out there to fail so they could remove him and put in Kamala without having to do a primary. | ||
This is how the Democrat Party runs its operations. | ||
They actually don't believe in democracy, ironically enough. | ||
They haven't had a real primary since Barack Obama beat Hillary Clinton in 2008, which, by the way, wasn't supposed to happen. | ||
That was supposed to be Hillary Clinton's primary to win. | ||
So when Obama won it, the Democrats said, whoa, hold on. | ||
We don't want voters deciding for us. | ||
We don't believe in democracy. | ||
So they've rigged everyone since, stole two from Bernie, did the fake Biden, bait and switch to Kamala. | ||
Kamala doesn't get a vote. | ||
You know the story. | ||
So now they're doing the same thing with the Biden cancer cover-up. | ||
It's the exact same story. | ||
They are using the Biden cancer cover-up, dementia, whatever else comes out about it, whatever else they're willing to admit. | ||
And they're now going to use that to say, okay, see, we're honest about Biden. | ||
Now do Trump. | ||
Now do Trump and Trump's health problems and Trump's age and Trump's mental facilities. | ||
Faculties and Trump's heart and everything else. | ||
100% that's what it's being used for. | ||
Now, we might start to see it shake up this week. | ||
Maybe they start to really mold it and shape it next week. | ||
But this is what it's going to turn into. | ||
Trump needs to have full transparency about his health. | ||
And we need multiple doctors and examination rooms. | ||
And we need blood tests and lab work and everything. | ||
We want the whole thing. | ||
And then they'll find something in his lab work or blood test, whatever it is they want. | ||
They'll find something and they'll say, see? | ||
See? | ||
And it doesn't matter if it's a nothing burger. | ||
They just need something to chew on like a dog, like a rabid dog foaming at the mouth. | ||
Just throw them something to chew on. | ||
Remember Rachel Maddow with the tax returns? | ||
That giant nothing burger? | ||
Oh, she's got the exclusive. | ||
She's got the Trump tax returns. | ||
This is going to ruin his chances of winning an election. | ||
This is going to expose it all. | ||
She releases it on her show. | ||
It's nothing. | ||
But that's what they do. | ||
It doesn't matter. | ||
So they'll find some weird oddity in a health report. | ||
They'll find some heart deal he has or some blood deal he has. | ||
And they can spin stuff. | ||
And they've got the whole medical industrial complex where they can take something that's not bad and claim it's bad. | ||
You could look at cholesterol for an example. | ||
Yeah. | ||
If I went and got my cholesterol checked at a doctor's office at a hospital or something, they'd tell me I'm going to have a heart attack tomorrow. | ||
Of course, it's total BS. | ||
And there's other things that go into cholesterol. | ||
You've been lied to about cholesterol. | ||
It's not about cholesterol. | ||
It's about, they'll say, see? | ||
Trump has high cholesterol. | ||
I'm using it as an example. | ||
This is a serious concern. | ||
He could have a heart attack any day. | ||
A ticking time bomb! | ||
So all of this stuff that you're seeing now, Jake Tapper didn't decide to be honest with you all of a sudden. | ||
Axios, CNN, all the people jumping on board. | ||
You think they just decided overnight they're just going to be honest all of a sudden? | ||
You really think now you might think they're that stupid. | ||
I don't. | ||
But do you think they're that stupid for four years with Joe Biden? | ||
They never noticed anything? | ||
Nobody noticed anything wrong with Joe Biden for four years, guys. | ||
Nobody had a clue. | ||
Just now they're realizing it? | ||
Now that he's, I don't even know, you've seen him like twice since he's been removed from office? | ||
Oh, now they've got it. | ||
Now they've figured it out. | ||
No. 100% bait and switch. | ||
They're sacrificing Joe Biden. | ||
They're using Joe Biden's health to go after Donald Trump. | ||
I'd say it's a matter of weeks before they start releasing damaging health reports on Donald Trump. | ||
Donald Trump's heart has major problems. | ||
What type of pills is Donald Trump taking? | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
I can already feel... | ||
It's like an Indian in a movie who puts his... | ||
Or a Native American puts his... | ||
He says, there's horses coming. | ||
I said, how do you know that? | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a master Apache chief. | |
What do you think? | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
I can already hear them working up. | ||
I can already hear the ticking on their typewriters and sending their emails. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's talk about how Trump's heart is going to explode. | |
Let's say Trump's a ticking time bomb. | ||
We demand. | ||
We can't have another Biden health cover-up. | ||
We can't have another presidential cover-up. | ||
Oh, by the way, what happened with Lloyd Austin? | ||
We don't talk about that. | ||
We can't have another debacle like this. | ||
We can't have another health crisis with the president. | ||
This is unacceptable. | ||
We were fooled. | ||
This is unbelievable. | ||
They fooled us about Biden. | ||
We're the victims here. | ||
Can't happen with Trump. | ||
We demand reports every day. | ||
We want to know what pills he's on. | ||
We want blood work every day. | ||
Lab tests every day. | ||
We want cameras in there. | ||
We want a colonoscopy. | ||
When was that headline from, guys? | ||
Oh, just over the weekend. | ||
Yeah, I'm telling you, I can already hear, I can hear the headlines coming. | ||
Jasmine Crockett, it's time for Republicans to question Trump's mental acuity. | ||
What a joke. | ||
Just go ahead and do it. | ||
Yeah, that's me right now. | ||
What do you hear, Chief Schroyer? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, they're about to attack Trump's health. | |
Just days away, maybe weeks. | ||
Big stories. | ||
Big exclusives. | ||
They'll have an inside source. | ||
They'll claim sources say. | ||
unidentified
|
Sources say Trump had a chest pain last week. | |
Meanwhile, Biden had a complete, probably a complete cancer center at his Delaware home. | ||
So all these vacations, he spent 40% of his time on vacation, likely most of that was getting cancer treatment. | ||
And they just lied to you about that. | ||
And then they set up the fake White House so they could keep the press out of the real White House so you wouldn't see Biden's true condition. | ||
Oh, but now they are being honest. | ||
I see. | ||
Yes, of course. | ||
Of course. | ||
Now here, aside from that, and we'll get to another angle of that coming up, with this whole bait and switch and the Democrat media deciding what issues they care about and what issues they don't care about. | ||
They may take this one too far, and I almost don't even want to say this. | ||
But it doesn't even matter at this point. | ||
They can't help themselves. | ||
They might take this one too far with the Biden health issue in their latest attempt to get rid of Trump. | ||
Maybe 25th Amendment is their plan. | ||
Or just, you know, attack him for whatever reason. | ||
But they might take it too far to the point where, because they can kind of, the Democrats right now, they can kind of get away with it all. | ||
I mean, let's just be honest. | ||
I'm not sure there's very many Republicans out there that actually care about justice at this point. | ||
You got a small handful. | ||
You got a small handful. | ||
And I think Nick Sordor, earlier today on the Alex Jones Show, said it perfectly. | ||
And I had never heard anybody from my congressional sources tell me. | ||
They've said, you know, kind of similar ideas. | ||
But Sorter says it seems like Seems like they don't want to be in the majority. | ||
Because when you're in the majority, you're supposed to get results, you're supposed to get things done. | ||
When you're in the minority, you can just go in front of the TV cameras and bitch and whine and complain, go do some fundraising, go home, no pressure. | ||
But when you're in the majority, there's pressure to do stuff. | ||
And these guys don't want to do anything. | ||
So you look at this auto-pen situation, and now you have Tapper. | ||
And the rest of the Democrat propaganda media coming out, and again, understand this is all to get Trump. | ||
This has nothing to do with them being honest about Joe Biden. | ||
Overnight, they decided to be honest all of a sudden. | ||
It's not what's happening. | ||
Well, they might take this too far now. | ||
Oh, the Biden cancer cover-up, the Biden dementia cover-up, how they were all fooled and everything. | ||
They might take it so far now that it will demand an investigation into the auto pen. | ||
Which should already be the case. | ||
But yeah, if Joe Biden had this cancer to the bone, suffering from the mental issues, was he signing 8,000 pardons in the last 72 hours? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
No. | ||
He probably couldn't even tell you a single one of them. | ||
Maybe, I think, maybe for his son? | ||
But he doesn't know. | ||
He doesn't know. | ||
So the Autopen scandal is one of the biggest scandals in American political history. | ||
And they want to sit here and they want to distract. | ||
And they want to say, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
The cancer cover-up, that's the scandal. | ||
No, it's not. | ||
That's the mainstream American media. | ||
Being awful at their jobs or great at their jobs, deceiving the American people, depending on how you look at it. | ||
That's not the scandal. | ||
Most people knew Joe Biden was suffering with health issues. | ||
It was obvious to most people. | ||
Yeah, the American media lied about that. | ||
That's on the American media. | ||
That's not a White House Joe Biden scandal. | ||
that's an American media scandal. | ||
So they want to sit here and say, No, it's not. | ||
The Biden cancer cover-up, that's on you, the media. | ||
That's not on Joe Biden. | ||
That's not on the White House. | ||
That's on you, the American media. | ||
You ran the cancer cover-up. | ||
What's bigger than Watergate is the auto pen. | ||
What's bigger than Watergate is the biggest criminal forgery in the history of this country with thousands of pardons and who knows what else. | ||
That's bigger than Watergate. | ||
And they're going to say, oh, the cancer cover-up, that's the big scandal. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
That's you. | ||
You're liars in the media. | ||
You lie to the American people. | ||
That's your job. | ||
You're the Democrat Party propaganda wing. | ||
The big scandal is the auto-pen, and President Trump called it treason, and he's right. | ||
So now we get to this point, and you just have to be realistic. | ||
Sometimes the... | ||
Like the reality that the Republican-controlled Congress is likely not going to do very much for us. | ||
Maybe the reality that the FBI under Patel and Bongino isn't going to do much for us. | ||
These are sad realities to come to terms with, but yet here we are. | ||
So you have to be realistic about this stuff. | ||
Folks, If nobody goes to prison for the auto-pin scandal, then we don't have a judicial system anymore. | ||
There is no judicial system. | ||
There is nobody serious inside of the Republican Party. | ||
There's nobody serious inside of the Justice Department or law enforcement at all. | ||
If nobody goes to prison, if there are no charges for the auto-pin scandal, Then there is nobody serious. | ||
There's nobody serious, and I don't know what we're doing here. | ||
I don't know what we're doing here. | ||
If you can't do something with that, then you're not willing to do anything. | ||
You're not serious about anything. | ||
You're not serious about institutional change in D.C. You're not serious about draining the swamp. | ||
You're not serious about arresting the deep state criminals. | ||
You're not serious about anything. | ||
You're not. | ||
And you can sit here and say, hey, look, we're looking into who had cocaine in the White House. | ||
Look, we don't care. | ||
I don't care who had cocaine in the White House. | ||
Tell me, did they do a bunch of lines of cocaine and then set up the auto pen? | ||
Tell me that. | ||
I don't care if there's a hundred bags of cocaine in the White House. | ||
Who forged the president's signature? | ||
Don't tell me you're investigating a bag of cocaine. | ||
When we had the biggest criminal forgery in the history of this country in the White House with an auto pen for the president's signature. | ||
And you're telling me about a bag of cocaine? | ||
And that's your good PR strategy? | ||
Insulting. | ||
It's almost, honestly, it's almost more insulting than you telling us that Epstein did kill himself at this point. | ||
So I have to sit here and reflect on this and just say, okay, well... | ||
We can be patient. | ||
Okay, fine. | ||
Ask for patience. | ||
But guess what? | ||
We were patient for the first four years of Trump. | ||
And look where that got us. | ||
So asking for patience is not really a good strategy. | ||
And us being patient is not a good strategy either. | ||
No. | ||
It's actually the opposite. | ||
It's actually a bad strategy. | ||
So to me, I'm now looking at the autopen situation. | ||
Is anybody denying it, by the way? | ||
It's like the left doesn't even want to talk about it. | ||
They're running their whole propaganda campaign of the cancer cover-up that they were a part of, like now they're exposing it. | ||
But notice, they don't even want to talk about the autopen. | ||
Notice how nobody's really denying the autopen. | ||
So it sounds like, okay, we're accepting the autopen was real. | ||
Circumstantial evidence would show us that the auto-pin scandal is real. | ||
But it's like with the Epstein stuff, okay, it was years ago. | ||
Somebody probably deleted whatever they could of the evidence. | ||
Maybe there's some there. | ||
Maybe there's not. | ||
Whatever. | ||
With the auto-pin thing, it's just like, okay, I mean, here it is. | ||
Are you going to do anything about it or not? | ||
The president called it treason. | ||
So, does anybody have any balls? | ||
Does anybody have any spine? | ||
Does anybody want to do anything here? | ||
Republicans can't even come together to agree on doge cuts. | ||
That shows you how corrupt things are. | ||
Republicans aren't even interested in the doge cuts. | ||
And I'm just sitting here like, okay, so you're not going to give us doge cuts? | ||
Why is that? | ||
Is that because people on both sides of the aisle are taking the money? | ||
Like, Republicans like to cheer on Doge, and they like to go to the meetings and cheer on Musk and celebrate, and yeah, cool. | ||
And then when it's time to actually make the cuts, the Republicans run away. | ||
The Republicans go hide in a hole. | ||
Is that because a lot of these transactions would need to be criminally investigated and result in criminal charges and criminal prosecutions that might hit the Republican Party, too? | ||
Because let's be honest, folks, that's exactly what needs to happen. | ||
Doge cuts, that's just the beginning. | ||
Doge arrests is where this needs to go. | ||
unidentified
|
But they're not interested. | |
So if we can't even get a criminal investigation into the greatest forgery in the history of this country, then nobody's serious. | ||
And Trump has called it treason. | ||
Trump has said, hey, this is a big scandal. | ||
It's treason. | ||
It's amazing, isn't it? | ||
It's amazing. | ||
And you know, he's such a nice guy, President Trump is. | ||
And you know what? | ||
Good for him. | ||
And he still goes out there and congratulates Pam Bondi on such a great job. | ||
And, you know, Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, they're doing a great job. | ||
You know what? | ||
Maybe Trump knows something we don't know. | ||
I hope that's the case. | ||
But I'm sitting here reevaluating things and I'm saying, okay, what can we realistically expect now versus I'm not going to put any hope into this basket because I'm just, why would I do that? | ||
And now I'm focused purely on the auto pen scandal and I'm saying, if there is no big investigation laws and they say, oh, we're going to have transcribed, I'm sick of hearing about this house activity that leads to nothing. | ||
We've learned from that as well. | ||
We've had people lie under oath in front of these committees. | ||
Nobody ever gets arrested for perjury. | ||
It's all a joke. | ||
So don't tell me that I'm going to be, oh, give me a little pat on the head. | ||
We're gonna have committee hearings about theああbrecht. | ||
No, no, no, no! | ||
No, no, no, no, no! | ||
Nope, no, no, no! | ||
And if we're not serious about that, we have no judicial system. | ||
We have nobody in Congress or any member of the Trump administration that is serious at this point when it comes to law enforcement. | ||
None. | ||
None. | ||
And don't tell me otherwise. | ||
Because I'm just sitting here looking for results, just like the rest of America. | ||
But see, this is why Bongino and Patel are telling you they're investigating a cocaine bag because they feel the pressure and they see the bad response. | ||
Oh yes, over the weekend. | ||
Jake Tapper, they're just figuring it all out, folks. | ||
The media rounds continue. | ||
It's all, they're setting it up to attack Trump's health. | ||
I guarantee it. | ||
Here it is, clip nine. | ||
And I think that we need to be skeptical of everything that we are told by people in power. | ||
And, I mean, that obviously should be the mantra of being a journalist to begin with. | ||
If your mother tells you she loves you, get a second source. | ||
But we just need to remember that. | ||
Like, politicians lie. | ||
White House's lie. | ||
Power is an aphrodisiac, and we just need to all remember that and not take at face value anything that we're trying. | ||
Politicians lie. | ||
The White House lies. | ||
Not us. | ||
Not us in the media. | ||
We don't lie. | ||
We were just deceived. | ||
We were deceived by the Biden White House, so... | ||
And even Brian Stelter, remember last week, Stelter trying to get in on the magic? | ||
We need transcripts. | ||
I want transcripts of everything Trump does. | ||
Well, then hire a transcriber, you fat ass. | ||
Almost everything he does is on camera. | ||
I'd get sick of it if I was Trump. | ||
We were lying, too. | ||
We got deceived. | ||
unidentified
|
And the White House lies, and politicians lie. | |
Wow, Jake, you've been in political media for, what, three decades, four decades, and you're just figuring that out? | ||
Oh, my gosh. | ||
Congratulations. | ||
Welcome to the party. | ||
Of course, it's all an act. | ||
See? | ||
Oh, the White House lies. | ||
Oh, yes. | ||
Oh, how convenient now that Trump is in the White House. | ||
Politicians lie. | ||
Oh, yes. | ||
How convenient now that the Republicans are in control. | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
I see. | ||
Totally, totally legitimate, Jake. | ||
I mean, folks. | ||
You want to see? | ||
You got to give them credit to a certain degree because it's like somebody that lies right to your face and you know they're lying to you and you catch them in the lie and then they just keep lying and you're like, okay, well, I guess I respect your commitment to this lie. | ||
Jussie Smollett still claims he was the victim of a hate crime. | ||
That's right. | ||
Over the weekend, he goes through his entire incident, it was made up, saying that he was assaulted. | ||
He was a victim of a hate crime, you know. | ||
So he's still trying to sell that lie. | ||
Even though the two men that he hired to beat him up came out and said, yeah, well, it was a stunt. | ||
He hired us to do it. | ||
They even did a whole documentary saying, yeah, here's where we fake beat him up and, you know. | ||
Called him racial obscenities and everything else. | ||
He's already gone through the legal process. | ||
He was found to have faked the whole thing. | ||
But no, he's still the victim. | ||
unidentified
|
That's what these Democrats do, man. | |
Even after they get caught, they just keep lying to you. | ||
They can't help themselves. | ||
It's a true psychological disorder. | ||
And that's where we're at with these people. | ||
Alright, Trump over the weekend. | ||
Taking some questions. | ||
He addresses the situation at Harvard and how they're looking to pull the funding here in clip two. | ||
Look, part of the problem with Harvard is that there are about 31%, almost 31% of foreigners coming to Harvard. | ||
We give them billions of dollars, which is ridiculous. | ||
We do grants, which we're probably not going to be doing much grants anymore to Harvard. | ||
But they're 31%, but they refuse to tell us who the people are. | ||
We want to know who the people are. | ||
Now, a lot of the foreign students we wouldn't have a problem with. | ||
I'm not going to have a problem with foreign students, but it shouldn't be 31%. | ||
It's too much because we have Americans that want to go there and to other places, and they can't go there because you have 31% foreign. | ||
Now, no foreign government contributes money to Harvard. | ||
We do. | ||
So why are they doing so many? | ||
Number one. | ||
Number two, we want a list of those foreign students and we'll find out whether or not they're okay. | ||
Many will be okay, I assume. | ||
And I assume with Harvard, many will be bad. | ||
And then the other thing is they're very anti-Semitic. | ||
Everybody knows they're anti-Semitic. | ||
And that's got to stop immediately. | ||
The end of that clip is extremely revealing. | ||
So the Trump administration, somebody, I'm guessing Pam Bondi, demanded a list of all the foreign students. | ||
unidentified
|
Now, why would they do that? | |
Well, because there's a criminal investigation ongoing. | ||
And it's for what? | ||
anti-Semitic speech. | ||
So it appears that Pam Bondi We know what they're doing. | ||
They're looking for students that were protesting Israel. | ||
That's what they're doing. | ||
And to have them removed from the country. | ||
So Bondi asks Harvard for a list of all their foreign students so that she can find people to kick out for anti-Semitism. | ||
And I guess Harvard wasn't being so compliant with that, so you can debate whether Harvard should comply or not. | ||
But isn't that amazing? | ||
Pam Bondi is more concerned about anti-Semitic speech on Harvard than she is about the auto-pin criminal forgery of Joe Biden's signatures. | ||
I can go down the list. | ||
I won't do it for the sake of time. | ||
I think you get the point. | ||
So that was kind of a revealing end to that clip. | ||
31% foreigners. | ||
Yeah, there's a lot of Chinese coming in there. | ||
I guess people coming in from other parts of the world that maybe don't appreciate Israel's leadership like they're supposed to. | ||
So they're all over that. | ||
They're all over that. | ||
But, you know, like the biggest crimes actually against the country, wide open border, 20 million invasion, Biden auto pen, 10% for the big eye. | ||
You know, like the real crimes that people should be investigating. | ||
Not some speech that they don't like. | ||
No, we can't get anything on that. | ||
But damn it, we'll get down to Harvard and their foreign students that don't like Israel. | ||
We'll get down to the bottom of that. | ||
That's reassuring. | ||
Now here's Trump talking about the tariffs and trying to bring manufacturing back to the U.S. in clip one. | ||
unidentified
|
Secretary Besson has said that we don't need to return textile manufacturing to the United States. | |
How do you see, like, a lot of your reciprocal tariffs are pretty big on those low-income countries? | ||
Yeah, no, I tend to agree. | ||
We're not looking to make sneakers and T-shirts. | ||
We want to make military equipment. | ||
We want to make big things. | ||
We want to make, do the AI thing with the computers and the many, many, many, many elements, but the textile, I'm not looking to make socks. | ||
We can do that very well at other locations. | ||
We are looking to do chips and computers and lots of other things. | ||
And tanks. | ||
And ships. | ||
Meaning ships, yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
You mentioned you were happy with the talks with Iran. | |
Now, I actually disagree with President Trump on that. | ||
I understand what he's communicating. | ||
However, he's basically saying, look, this is what we've looked into. | ||
You know, semiconductors, chips, technological equipment that we're going to need for AI. | ||
We're also talking about military stuff. | ||
So more national interest, infrastructure stuff, steel, you know, things that are more important. | ||
So I get that. | ||
But I'd also like to see the textiles as well. | ||
I'd like to be able to compete. | ||
If you're a startup company and you want to sell hats or T-shirts or whatever, I'd like... | ||
I actually would like that. | ||
So that might not be Trump's priority, but I'd like to see that too. | ||
And I would like to see a giant Nike factory maybe in a Main Street area that can hire 20,000 people to make shoes, socks, hats, whatever. | ||
Why not? | ||
What's wrong with that? | ||
You know, you're telling me that... | ||
If he didn't have the option to go work at a Nike factory for maybe $30, $40 an hour, he wouldn't take that? | ||
Why? | ||
Why wouldn't we just bring them all? | ||
Why wouldn't we be all-encompassing for that? | ||
So I get what Trump is saying, but I would say, no, let's bring it all back. | ||
I'd say, let's go ahead and just bring it all back. | ||
The crew says if you had your Apple buildings here, they wouldn't have suicide nets. | ||
And they wouldn't have the abortion facilities either. | ||
Don't forget about that. | ||
You know, abortion on demand and the suicide nets. | ||
So, no, I would like to see that back here. | ||
I would. | ||
Absolutely. | ||
And I mean, see, there's this whole idea, and I just don't think it's, I think it's fair. | ||
But nobody talks about just the respect of an honest day's work for an honest day's pay, even if it's not the most rewarding or ceremonious job out there. | ||
But I mean, you ever go to the grocery store and you might see a middle-aged man, middle-aged woman working there, working the checkout, probably making $20 an hour, give or take. | ||
You don't think that they would go take a job at a factory instead for, Double the money? | ||
It's like, they need the work. | ||
They need the paycheck. | ||
You're telling me they wouldn't take a higher-paying job? | ||
So, I would like to see it all come back. | ||
Now, here's Trump talking about the big, beautiful bill. | ||
Clip three. | ||
unidentified
|
Republicans have said there are going to be significant changes to the budget bill. | |
Well, I want the Senate and the Senators to change, you know, to make the changes they want, and we'll go back to the House and we'll see if we can get them. | ||
In some cases, those changes maybe are something I'd agree with, to be honest. | ||
You know, it happens. | ||
But we've had a very good response from the Senate. | ||
And I don't know how Democrats can't vote for it. | ||
If they don't vote for it, they're talking about a 68% tax increase. | ||
Remember that. | ||
If the Democrats don't vote, it's a 68% tax increase, which is ridiculous. | ||
And one of the things that's being covered indirectly is the fact that we'll be long And it's going to have indirectly something to do, not directly, but indirectly something to do with the bill. | ||
The one big, beautiful bill. | ||
And it is a big, beautiful bill. | ||
And so I think the Senate is going to get there. | ||
I hope they're going to get there. | ||
I think they're going to have changes. | ||
Some will be minor and some will be fairly significant. | ||
We've been working with the House all the way up. | ||
They've been working together. | ||
And the Speaker has been working with the leader of the Senate. | ||
And, you know, they've done a great job. | ||
John Thune and Mike Johnson have done a fantastic job. | ||
They've been working together all the way up. | ||
unidentified
|
So hopefully that'll be fine. | |
Actually, I don't think it will be so fine. | ||
And I understand what Trump is doing. | ||
Just, you know, saying everybody's doing a good job makes them feel good. | ||
They kind of need that. | ||
I think these politicians need a lot of patting on the back and being told they're good boys, even when they're not. | ||
But I actually think there's going to be a lot of problems. | ||
And I think, for one, the Senate Republicans might take a very strong stand on the SALT deductions. | ||
Now, again, all we know is that the five Republicans came out of California and New York. | ||
There were five Republicans in the House that said they would not vote for the bill. | ||
If they got rid of the SALT deductions or put them back to original $10,000 where they were for Trump's first four years, instead they upped them to $40,000. | ||
So those five Republicans were all in New York and California, go figure, SALT states. | ||
The Senate looks like it might take a hard stand on that. | ||
We'll see if anybody at the Senate wants to really make waves and try to bring doge cuts back in, but it looks like the Republicans have already sacrificed that. | ||
I like Byron Donalds. | ||
I think he's an honest dealer. | ||
But I think to a certain degree, maybe Byron has kind of eaten the political BS a little bit, saying, oh, well, we're going to take care of that in the next round of votes and spending and bills. | ||
I'd like to believe that, but I don't. | ||
I just don't. | ||
And I think they're making excuses as the reasons why they don't want to do these doge cuts. | ||
So you could have some Republican senators that just want to take a grandstand and say, hey, you know what? | ||
We did these doge cuts. | ||
We're supposed to be serious about it. | ||
Now I'm not seeing them. | ||
No. | ||
I think the Senate Republicans could actually form a block and say, we're getting rid of the SALT deductions. | ||
So those will be two obstacles I could potentially see upcoming in the very near future. | ||
But it's just pathetic. | ||
It's just pathetic Republicans are caving on this. | ||
It's pathetic that they're caving on salt. | ||
It's even more pathetic they're caving on doge. | ||
Now, here's some activity over the weekend, and basically Musk is confirming what we were afraid of, that Congress is really not interested. | ||
They're not interested in the doge cuts. | ||
So he responded to this from Sawyer Merritt over the weekend. | ||
I think Elon is realizing that despite the promises made by the new administration and a Republican-controlled Congress and all the campaign platforms they ran on, the current incentive structures and entrenched special interests in government make it nearly impossible to enact any meaningful, long-fold changes to address the many big issues we face. | ||
So while Doge will continue to do its thing and do great work, as Elon has said, it seems he's mainly now focusing on using his companies to take matters into his own hands and drive us towards a future of sustainable abundance. | ||
To which Elon Musk replied, yeah, sigh. | ||
Sigh, meaning that's exactly right. | ||
All those people that talked a big game with the Doge cuts weren't actually interested at the end of the day. | ||
Which is pretty pathetic. | ||
Still, there's been significant cuts made. | ||
It's not near as significant as it needs to be. | ||
But I think the exposure has been extremely valuable as well. | ||
The exposure of all the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
And while we're likely not going to get results from it now, not any big results that we want, I think this paves the way. | ||
Because here's the deal. | ||
This is how I see it. | ||
Maybe in the midterms, but probably more likely the next presidential election. | ||
If you want to get in as a Republican, you're going to have to be a serious person. | ||
No more watered-down politicians. | ||
No more lukewarm politicians. | ||
Republican voters are not going to go and pull the lever for somebody that's not going to do anything. | ||
Republican voters actually want results and are serious about institutional change. | ||
And now with what we've seen after President Trump, what we've seen with Doge, we can obviously see the need for it. | ||
So we might fail now, but I think two, I really think two elections. | ||
I think the next presidential election cycle, people that want to run as a Republican are going to be people that actually want to get in there and do something. | ||
They're going to be people that actually want to get in there, make some institutional change, and try to save the country. | ||
Right now, You've got maybe 10% of Republicans that are like that. | ||
Maybe. | ||
Which is a better number than like 1%. | ||
So you just kind of look at all the numbers and analyze it. | ||
You say, okay, well, we're definitely making progress. | ||
If we're talking about trying to save the country, then the path is obviously through the Republican Party, which is corrupt and has its own problems. | ||
But the path is obviously there. | ||
Trump saw it. | ||
Musk saw it. | ||
A lot of other people saw it. | ||
So that's going to be the path. | ||
But these lukewarm, spineless, coward Republican politicians, they're in their last days. | ||
And in order to win an election as a Republican, probably in two election cycles, you're going to have to be serious. | ||
You're going to have to say, you know what, no, we're going to do doge cuts. | ||
We're actually going to slash all of these ridiculous expenditures. | ||
We're actually going to claw stuff back. | ||
Marjorie Taylor Greene, she's one of the good ones. | ||
She says they should be voting on doge cuts every single week. | ||
She's right. | ||
But that's what I'm trying to say is the future of the Republican Party is going to be more reflective of somebody like Marjorie Taylor Greene than Johnny Republican in some district you don't know about whose name you don't know about because that's how they want it. | ||
Musk also said he did his best. | ||
He thought the GOP was going to be interested in making all these cuts. | ||
They exposed all the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
And now they're just not interested in putting it into these bills. | ||
So Musk said, well, I did my best. | ||
And that's really a shame. | ||
And I think at the end of the day, though, it's not as much about the money. | ||
I think it's more about the fact if they had to wave the white flag... | ||
The next necessary step is obvious. | ||
Criminal investigations. | ||
Whose idea was it to spend whatever amount of money on a gecko farm in Zambia? | ||
Whose idea was it to spend a bunch of money on a gay trans comic book in South America? | ||
Whose idea was it to get little critters drunk on different alcohols and then see how they mingle with one another? | ||
So I think it's, you know, the money is one thing, but then it's also like, yeah, well, this is serious fraud here. | ||
Now, if we codify this, people are going to have to be investigated for this fraud. | ||
So they don't want that either. | ||
So you can imagine some of these, I'm sure some of these offices, their phones are ringing off the hook. | ||
If not just the politicians themselves, this might be a little more personal. | ||
I'm sure the politicians' phones ringing off the hook is like, hey, if we codify these things, they might come after us for fraud. | ||
We can't have that. | ||
So I think that that's a lot of it, is that there is just straight up criminal fraud with all this government spending, and so they're scared to death that it might come after them. | ||
Would you be willing to do some sort of a deal that says, alright, we won't go after anybody for criminal fraud charges if you codify every doge cut and finding in this session? | ||
And maybe you say, if you don't do it this session, that's your last chance. | ||
So, we'll give you one shot. | ||
And it's kind of on theme. | ||
I mean, the Trump administration did it. | ||
With the illegal aliens as well. | ||
He said, hey, you came here illegally. | ||
Go home. | ||
Just go home. | ||
So, okay, you give a shot. | ||
Maybe you give them a shot. | ||
It's like, hey, we know that there were hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud with government spending. | ||
Let us cut it, and we'll leave you alone. | ||
But if you don't do it now, if you don't let us cut $2 trillion, Then we're going to come back in the next round and we're going to find out who is abusing and engaging in fraud. | ||
We're going to go ahead and just do that. | ||
And then maybe that can get it done. | ||
But these negotiations aren't over. | ||
The doge cuts are going to come back up at the Senate or who knows, maybe back at the House when this starts to get more noisy. | ||
And we'll obviously be following all of that and giving you the daily updates right here on InfoWars in the InfoWars War Room. | ||
All right. | ||
First hour nearly in the books. | ||
The latest product, the latest supplement at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Have you tried it yet? | ||
Have you purchased yours yet? | ||
Ultimate Life Force Triple Action Spike Protein Detox formulated for the bioengineered world. | ||
This is the latest and greatest from thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
And remember, as is the case with all the other supplements we have there, you can get 50% off With a subscription, that's the auto-purchase, auto-ship, also guarantees it's in stock for you. | ||
So the subscription, very beneficial for you as well. | ||
But this latest supplement, the Ultimate Life Force, supports immune health, reduces inflammation, promotes respiratory health, enhances circulation, aids digestion, boosts nutrient absorption, antioxidant support. | ||
With all these great ingredients inside of Ultimate Life Force. | ||
So get yours today, thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Remember, when you sign up for Auto Ship, you get a discount on that subscription. | ||
And when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, you support us. | ||
You support this show, and you keep us on the air. | ||
So if you're one of those loyal audience members out there, we like to keep these transmissions free for you. | ||
We ask that you just get a great product by shopping at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
And remember, when you shop, you get automatic entries into our raffles and giveaways right now. | ||
AlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. | ||
We appreciate your continued support to keep us on the air. | ||
We're going to hear a powerful speech from Pete Hegseth on the other side of this break. | ||
President Trump, Vice President Vance, Chairman Cain. | ||
Gold Star families, ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us today to remember our fallen warriors. | ||
We gather here to honor our very best, gone in their youth. | ||
To properly do so, we understand who they are and what they fought for. | ||
It is our simple duty to them. | ||
You know, throughout time, civilizations have honored the powerful, the well-connected. | ||
And the well-born emperors and kings have built magnificent shrines to their own royal greatness. | ||
Yet in America, with our great experiment in self-government, it is fitting that the most honored and closely guarded tomb in the land is that of an anonymous soldier of an unknown rank. | ||
When the first unknown soldier was selected for burial in 1921, he laid in state at the Capitol Rotunda. | ||
Throngs of Americans paid their respects. | ||
When the tomb was dedicated on November 11th, Veterans Day, the unknown received the Medal of Honor. | ||
It's a uniquely American tradition that we honor anonymous sacrifice above worldly greatness. | ||
While we don't know the unknown's identity, race, or creed, we know his story. | ||
It's the story of every soldier, every warrior. | ||
It's a simple story, as old as war. | ||
A young man with hopes and dreams and loves, who's called by his country, leaves behind his hometown, his parents, his siblings, his sweetheart. | ||
All that he knows. | ||
To go fight a war that he may or may not understand. | ||
He's called to go through hell and back. | ||
To sleep in a trench. | ||
To eat out of a tin cup or on the hood of a Humvee. | ||
To pray as bullets and bombs thunder around him. | ||
To fear for the bullet or the mortar or the IED or the RPG with his name on it. | ||
He does it willingly. | ||
And stoically, because he loves his country, his brothers in arms, and his family. | ||
This is the story of the unknown. | ||
The story of the fallen soldier who we have gathered today to honor. | ||
It is the story of the American warrior. | ||
He answered the call, fought, and died for this republic. | ||
The ultimate sacrifice of a free people. | ||
You see, the American soldier fights not because he hates What's in front of him, but because he loves what's behind him. | ||
We honor his self for sacrifice, his courage, his duty, and his love. | ||
As Jesus taught his disciples, greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. | ||
This love is a gift given freely, and yet this gift comes with responsibility to those living. | ||
We owe a duty to those who have fallen in war. | ||
They have paid a debt we can never repay. | ||
And for that, we owe gratitude and remembrance. | ||
We owe at least this, to remember their sacrifice and honor their memory year after year. | ||
Salute after salute, ceremony after ceremony, parade after parade, prayer after prayer. | ||
That by our remembrance, We keep lit the eternal flame of their heroic deeds in defense of our nation. | ||
And we owe eternal vigilance. | ||
Eternal vigilance, the price of freedom. | ||
These men died for something. | ||
The hope of a free, secure, and peaceful republic. | ||
That is our inheritance, and we must steward it and hand it down to our kids and our grandkids. | ||
We must live worthy of it. | ||
These men dreamt of a future in which their children would not fear of attack. | ||
No enemy could threaten their peace. | ||
No war could require them to take up arms. | ||
The duty we owe these men is peace, which only can be achieved through strength. | ||
Pete Hexack, with a powerful, emotional, passionate Memorial Day address this weekend, and he's right. | ||
We must remember that those that fought, You know, I don't want to hear a word from the Democrats on pardons, but, oh, they're going to have it. | ||
They're complaining about a recent Trump pardon here. | ||
Trump's pardon of Paul Wolchek. | ||
Follows to Mother's Fundraising. | ||
This is just one of the headlines. | ||
Basically, the story is this gentleman was in prison for some tax fraud. | ||
His mother, Walczak's mother, attends a Mar-a-Lago fundraising dinner about a month ago, and then her son receives the pardon. | ||
So maybe you have some issues with it, maybe you don't. | ||
I don't want to hear a damn word from a single Democrat. | ||
I don't want to hear a damn thing from any of the fake news mainstream media about this pardon until you address the autopen. | ||
Shut the hell up about any Trump pardons. | ||
You shut your damn mouth until you're ready to talk about the autopen. | ||
Then, if you want to talk about some of the problems you have with Trump's pardon, then I'll open my ear. | ||
But until then, shut the hell up and sit the hell down and go back to spouting off your propaganda. | ||
So address the auto-pen pardons or shut the hell up about this single one. | ||
Kindly. | ||
But hey guys, the FBI is all over it. | ||
FBI is reopening investigation into the cocaine found at the Biden White House. | ||
Ooh! | ||
FBI to revisit Supreme Court leak and D.C. pipe bombs as well. | ||
This is all PR. | ||
unidentified
|
This is all PR. | |
And look, I get it. | ||
I get it. | ||
If I'm Dan Bongino and Kash Patel who have built up all of this capital with the MAGA movement and American patriots and then they get in there at the FBI, And, I mean, they are watching their stock tank. | ||
Tank. | ||
And I'll be honest, I actually feel bad. | ||
Beyond the politics of it, I feel bad because, you know, these guys, they worked hard. | ||
They put in a lot of good work to earn that good faith and that good trust from the MAGA movement. | ||
And then they get into the FBI, and now people are like, well, what's going on here? | ||
Now you tell us Epstein did kill himself? | ||
What? | ||
So I get it. | ||
They see their stock tanking and they know eventually they're not going to be at the FBI anymore. | ||
Eventually they're going to get back into the private sector and want to sell books and host talk shows and podcasts and everything else, sell merchandise. | ||
But if their stock hit zero, they're not going to be able to do that. | ||
And all that good faith and social credit they built up over the years is going to be gone. | ||
So, I mean, in a way, I do kind of feel bad because it's not easy, folks. | ||
Getting that trust, making a name for yourself in media to be able to make a good living and have a brand associated with your name, that's hard work. | ||
Bongino and Patel did it. | ||
But now they see it cliff-diving. | ||
And so they're saying, okay, we've got to give them something here. | ||
And I'll be honest, this is actually really bad news. | ||
Sure, fine. | ||
Let's find out Hunter Biden was doing cocaine at the White House. | ||
Oh, wow, I'd be stunned. | ||
And quite frankly, I really don't even care. | ||
Okay, the D.C. pipe bombs. | ||
Yeah, let's find out who did that if you can. | ||
Okay, yeah, there's some value there. | ||
The Supreme Court leak. | ||
Yeah, same thing. | ||
There's some value there. | ||
But is it consequential to American politics and MAGA moving forward? | ||
Maybe the pipe bombs. | ||
The Supreme Court leak, not so much. | ||
The cocaine baggie, nothing. | ||
The pipe bombs are really the only thing I think is truly relevant here. | ||
But to me, the feel for me is, and they're the ones that have cultivated this environment, but the feel to me is, this means they're not doing anything. | ||
And the whole message, mostly coming from Bongino, Trust us, basically. | ||
He's saying, well, I'm not asking you to trust me. | ||
Well, that's exactly what you're asking us to do. | ||
A lot of good work being done behind the scenes. | ||
Well, okay. | ||
That means you're asking us to trust that that's the case. | ||
This is why I'm afraid. | ||
Because if all of that work was really going on, and it's like they see their stock tanking, they know, hey, it's all going to come right back up when we actually do the deep state arrests. | ||
Arrest the people that ran Crossfire Hurricane, the corrupt members of the Biden administration, corrupt members of the Obama administration, the auto pen thing. | ||
It's like, okay, hey, you know what? | ||
We're going through a rough patch right now, but once we get this stuff out there and we get these arrests, stock will be higher than ever. | ||
So we don't need to throw them red meat about cocaine in the White House. | ||
Don't worry about that. | ||
Just stick to the good work. | ||
And the fact that they felt that they had to do this for good press tells me That's my concern now. | ||
Why would you feel the need to say, hey, we're looking into the cocaine, if you had real stuff going on? | ||
So that tells me there, to me, I read that as there's not much real going on here, so here, we'll look into the White House cocaine thing. | ||
Well, who's asking for that? | ||
Nobody wants to hear about that. | ||
Nobody cares. | ||
And, you know, Bondi gets a lot of heat because she goes on Fox News all the time, and that's an easy one to spot. | ||
You know, Patel has been doing a lot of PR, too. | ||
He hasn't gotten near the heat that Bondi has because she shows her face on Fox News. | ||
But Patel's been doing tons of PR. | ||
He's been going to play in hockey games and going and doing hockey stuff. | ||
Hey, I like hockey. | ||
Have a good time. | ||
I'm all for it. | ||
And this is how stuff works, by the way. | ||
You work hard and you produce good outcomes, then yeah, you can go enjoy yourself. | ||
Yeah, nobody's going to feel bad about it. | ||
Hey, he did a bunch of great work. | ||
He's going to go enjoy himself for a day. | ||
Fine. | ||
Go enjoy. | ||
Go have a hockey game. | ||
But when you produce nothing and then you go enjoy yourself, People say, hey, what the hell's going on here? | ||
And I already know the response. | ||
Oh, what do you mean we produced nothing? | ||
We've arrested all these people. | ||
We've arrested the top 10 criminals. | ||
The last administration did that. | ||
We're not looking for normal activity here. | ||
We're not celebrating participation. | ||
We need something spectacular. | ||
We thought you were one of us. | ||
Well, you know, Hunter Biden was doing cocaine at the White House, so... | ||
Maybe that's a more interesting one to investigate. | ||
By the way, this is hilarious. | ||
NPR sues Trump over executive order cutting federal funding. | ||
The entitlement of these people, the entitlement of left-wingers is... | ||
Honestly, you know what? | ||
In a very serious note, aside from the politics of it, It's just like that lady we played. | ||
By the way, this woman we played last week is obese. | ||
She's an obese woman. | ||
She's fat. | ||
She barely even fits in her own minivan. | ||
And she's saying, my food stamps are being cut, so I'm going to start stealing food, and that's my right. | ||
I'm entitled to it. | ||
Think about the disconnect from reality. | ||
This has now reached levels of a psychological breakdown where you actually, you think you're just entitled to something. | ||
It just is given to you. | ||
And that's not how the real world works. | ||
So NPR, no, your funding comes from the government. | ||
That can be cut at any time. | ||
And by the way, the government is really just a concept. | ||
There is no physical thing you can touch that is the U.S. government. | ||
It's made up of people, and things are done at the will or the behest of the people. | ||
The government doesn't even exist. | ||
So, you're just claiming you're entitled to other people's stuff. | ||
But they might not even understand that. | ||
And that's why I'm saying we're now reaching this, this is like a psychological issue. | ||
This is a massive psychological issue, this entitlement issue. | ||
And even the people at NPR, what do you mean you're cutting our funding? | ||
We're cutting your funding. | ||
Well, we're suing you. | ||
What do you mean you're suing me? | ||
You're not entitled to those funds. | ||
They think they are so under this belief they're entitled to the money that they're going to sue over it. | ||
Well, they'll lose the lawsuit, I'm sure, but... | ||
Here's another example of this woman. | ||
And, you know, this clip is going viral because she's out here talking trash on America and, you know, you get caught in a viral video doing that. | ||
But again, it shows the issue of entitlement in these liberals'brains. | ||
It is truly... | ||
We've identified many psychological issues that they have. | ||
The mental issues the liberals have, like one is they don't understand... | ||
They don't understand action result. | ||
They do not get it. | ||
They literally do not get it. | ||
It's a psychological issue that they have. | ||
It's a mental disorder that they have. | ||
And I guess maybe that comes along with entitlements too, but it's totally different. | ||
Listen to this liberal here in clip 15. The United States is kind of trash. | ||
unidentified
|
It doesn't treat its people well. | |
What? | ||
See what she says? | ||
Pause it right there. | ||
Doesn't treat its people well? | ||
Yeah, clearly you have no idea what the United States of America is if that's your response. | ||
It doesn't treat its people well. | ||
JFK, ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for your country. | ||
I don't think this woman gets it. | ||
I don't think they get it. | ||
They just believe that the government is here to give you stuff. | ||
They believe the government is here for you to just live off of, exist off of, and you're entitled to that existence. | ||
It has to be, it's like, it is like a child. | ||
And these people are like children politically. | ||
They are like infants and toddlers politically. | ||
But they're adults, so they're kind of politically retarded. | ||
But this is how they think, this is how they operate. | ||
So what do you do when a kid is acting up? | ||
You just take it away and you make them learn. | ||
The entitlements need to be cut. | ||
NPR needs to be totally defunded, and they need to learn how the real world works. | ||
You are not entitled to other people's money, and the government doesn't exist as an entity to support you. | ||
But they have to learn this the hard way. | ||
And yeah, they're going to scream and cry and throw temper tantrums like a toddler does, but they have to learn. | ||
So I don't even worry about the rest of that clip. | ||
Let's just move on from that. | ||
Alright, some other big news out of the Trump administration dealing with the vaccines. | ||
Now, they're still running these propaganda campaigns. | ||
This is all Big Pharma funded. | ||
But slowly and surely, RFK Jr. is getting these COVID shots out of the vaccine schedule. | ||
And so he just made this announcement. | ||
It's just about every schedule now is removing them. | ||
Listen to this in clip four. | ||
Hi, everybody. | ||
I'm Robert F. Kennedy Jr., your HHS secretary, and I'm here today with NIH Director Dr. Jay Bhattacharya and FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty McCary. | ||
I couldn't be more pleased to announce that as of today, the COVID vaccine for healthy children and healthy pregnant women has been removed from the CDC recommended immunization schedule. | ||
Last year, the Biden administration urged healthy children to get yet another COVID shot, despite the lack of any clinical data, to support the repeat booster strategy in children's. | ||
That ends today. | ||
It's common sense and it's good science. | ||
There's no evidence healthy kids need it today. | ||
And most countries have stopped recommending it for children. | ||
We're now one step closer to realizing President Trump's promise to make America healthy again. | ||
You know, there's two aspects of the Biden administration that kind of get looked over. | ||
People just don't talk about too much. | ||
One being, you know, Joe Biden said he would cure cancer. | ||
Remember that? | ||
Called it the cancer moonshot. | ||
Maybe he meant to say I had cancer. | ||
All jokes aside, obviously that didn't happen. | ||
I'm not sure. | ||
I think the interests in not curing cancer outweigh the interest in curing cancer at this point, but that's a different story. | ||
But Biden also said if you didn't take the vaccine, there'd be a winter of death. | ||
Was that 2020 or 2021? | ||
I think it was 2021. | ||
Winter of death if you didn't take the vaccine. | ||
Of course, most people that took the vaccine, they're the ones having the problem. | ||
By the way, just as an aside on that note, Billy Joel, one of the great musicians and performers of all time, on tour right now, had to cancel his tour. | ||
Billy Joel cancels all tour dates and reveals shock diagnosis. | ||
He's suffering from a debilitating health condition. | ||
He fell over on the stage about a month ago. | ||
He tried to continue the tour, God bless his soul, but has now had to cancel. | ||
Remaining tour dates. | ||
Some have been rescheduled. | ||
Well, he did get the vaccine. | ||
This is a man who I think got multiple doses of the vaccine. | ||
I wish he would have listened to his friend Eric Clapton. | ||
Instead, Billy Joel attacked Eric Clapton. | ||
Clapton, of course, was skeptical of the vaccines, warned people against the vaccines. | ||
By the way, these are universally understood. | ||
Two of the best musicians of all time. | ||
So that's really sad that Billy Joel is suffering like this. | ||
But, you know, he did get the vaccine, and now all the people that got the vaccines, they're the ones suffering and having the health crisis, not us. | ||
But Biden said winner of death. | ||
That didn't happen. | ||
So they're running their propaganda campaigns like this on ABC News. | ||
Infectious disease experts told ABC News that mRNA and mRNA vaccines have been studied for decades. | ||
The vaccines are safe and effective, and that the shots were instrumental in saving lives during the COVID-19 pandemic. | ||
What we know about the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines amid recent scrutiny. | ||
This is, folks, this is incredible level propaganda here. | ||
Now, if you're a new listener and you didn't go through all of it with us in 2020 and beyond, you need to understand something here. | ||
They were working on these vaccines before the COVID pandemic was even a thing. | ||
They had the actual side effects and results of some of the clinical studies of the mRNA injections. | ||
By the way, they denied it was even mRNA. | ||
In the beginning of this, they said, oh no, no, it's a normal vaccine with the disease in it to just give you the immunity. | ||
They denied it was even an experimental technology. | ||
Now they're saying, oh yeah, it was mRNA the whole time. | ||
So first they said it wasn't even that. | ||
So now they're just saying, oh, it's an mRNA vaccine. | ||
No, it's an mRNA injection. | ||
It's not a vaccine. | ||
But first they denied that. | ||
Now they're forced to admit it. | ||
They knew these vaccines were going to give you blood clots, give you heart problems, give you cancer. | ||
They knew in 2020 that was going to happen. | ||
But they couldn't bring them to market. | ||
They needed the emergency authorization to bring them to market. | ||
So they got it with COVID. | ||
They brought them to market. | ||
They killed a million people deader than a hammer. | ||
And now they're still out here running this propaganda telling you how great it is and it saves lives. | ||
It's all BS. | ||
That's how sick, that's how diabolical these people are. | ||
They do not care. | ||
You and I can't even fathom such an existence. | ||
You and I can't even fathom being so soulless and so disconnected from God. | ||
And that's what this is. | ||
It's total disconnect from God. | ||
And you've either taken some mental approach that you think you're the steward of the earth, so you're going to kill a bunch of people to save the earth, or you're just purely profit-motivated. | ||
So first it was, oh, these are just vaccines. | ||
Now it's, oh, it is an mRNA injection. | ||
Oh, okay. | ||
They knew it was going to give you cancer. | ||
They knew it was going to give you blood clots. | ||
They knew it was going to give you Guillain-Barre. | ||
They knew it was going to give you seizures. | ||
They knew all of it. | ||
And that's why they could not bring mRNA vaccines, well, mRNA injections, to market because the side effects were so bad. | ||
They got them to market with the emergency use, and then it was game over. | ||
That's also why they had to reject any other types of treatments. | ||
Like monoclonal antibodies or hydroxychloroquine with zinc, vitamin D, or that famous horse dewormer, ivermectin, which of course has been a Nobel Prize winning treatment for other things. | ||
So they had to deny that any of those worked because the only way they could get the emergency use for these deadly shots was if there were no other treatments. | ||
It was all a scam. | ||
And now that we're finally blocking this scam and stopping people from being injected with this poison, here comes the pharmaceutical propaganda to say it's fine. | ||
Nothing to worry about. | ||
Even though all the data suggests otherwise. | ||
So good job, RFK Jr. and team, on taking care of that. | ||
Truly great stuff. | ||
All right, meanwhile, Greg Cesar, unfortunately, this is a product of Austin, Texas. | ||
He's a dirty commie. | ||
He's really stupid, too. | ||
Listen to what he says here about Elon Musk in a TV interview. | ||
Honestly, it shows you how dumb, and we knew he was dumb. | ||
He came out of Austin. | ||
He's a moron. | ||
But listen to what he says here in clip eight. | ||
So what I think your viewers at home need to know is we need to take three steps. | ||
One, make sure We need to hold him accountable. | ||
Two, everyone needs to know that it's illegal for Elon Musk to stay a federal employee past May 30th. | ||
That's what federal law said. | ||
Folks, this is just so hilariously wrong. | ||
It's honestly comical. | ||
No, Elon Musk would not be committing a crime by staying on as an advisor or a Doge employee or any of that stuff. | ||
Yes, there are laws that have limits as far as your contracts, but technically he's not even really in that realm. | ||
But this idea that somehow Musk might be committing a crime if he stays on board for another month is hilarious. | ||
So I kind of hope he does just to trigger these retard leftists. | ||
He's committing a crime. | ||
He's not even getting paid. | ||
Elon Musk, richest man in the world. | ||
He could be doing whatever the hell he wants. | ||
Whatever he wants. | ||
And instead, he's volunteering to clean up your government. | ||
And you, Greg Cesar, a dirty moron communist, say you're going to go after him for criminal charges if he doesn't stop doing that work. | ||
Well, what does that say about you? | ||
Go ahead. | ||
Finish the clip. | ||
A federal employee passed May 30th. | ||
And three, Democrats need to make clear we're not going to go easy on this guy if we retake the majority. | ||
We can use our subpoena and investigative power in a majority to look into Musk or any other billionaire that has broken any criminal laws enriching themselves using the power of the White House. | ||
Let's see. | ||
Who has enriched themselves using the power of the White House? | ||
Donald Trump? | ||
No, he's lost money. | ||
Elon Musk? | ||
No, he's lost money. | ||
Oh, that's right, Joe Biden! | ||
Joe Biden is the one there. | ||
And see what they're admitting here? | ||
Soon as we take power, we're going to investigate everybody. | ||
Soon as we take power, we're investigating anybody who's rubbed shoulders with Donald Trump. | ||
We're coming for you, Elon Musk, as soon as we take power. | ||
By the way, that's all totally illegal, totally communist, totally authoritarian. | ||
But that doesn't matter to the Democrats. | ||
We can't even get them to take a breath of air and get to work. | ||
Man! | ||
You know, the one thing that would give me hope, maybe it dwindles with time, but a lot of the members of the Trump administration were victims of the deep state. | ||
We're victims of the Democrat authoritarianism, like Tulsi Gabbard. | ||
Now, here she is talking about what happened to her, but more importantly, she's talking about what happened to the American people. | ||
You were put on a terror watch list by the Biden administration if you weren't a good little covidiot and beyond. | ||
Yeah, they put you on a list. | ||
How is this not a bigger scandal? | ||
Clip six. | ||
Done here, what was done under the Biden administration. | ||
Was it they were saying that everyone who opposed, say, mask mandates or the vaccination of children are domestic violent extremists? | ||
Or were they saying that those are opinions often held by domestic violent extremists? | ||
Yeah, well, that's a very good question that when you look at the language of these documents that I've declassified, first, the strategic implementation plan of the Biden administration's designation of potential violent extremists, | ||
And there's a consistent thread through here that these ideologies that they are designating as turning into potentially violent activities or being manifested in violent activities happen to be those of people who were using their First Amendment rights to oppose certain policies of the Biden administration. | ||
And while some of the examples that are focused on there have to do with those who oppose the covid vaccine mandates, those who opposed the mask mandates, parents who were concerned that their children going to school may be forcibly vaccinated with the covid vaccine without the consent or awareness of parents. | ||
The list goes on and on, but it's not exclusive to this. | ||
In some of these reports that we've declassified, it shows that. | ||
Could therefore have propensities to join a militia or could become these domestic violent extremists that we're talking about here. | ||
And again, it's important to look at this in the totality and the sequence of how this happened. | ||
These documents were issued in December of 2021. | ||
You remember very well, Will, the speech, the ominous speech that President Biden gave in 2022, where with this red background and Marines standing in the background. | ||
He issued an address to the nation warning the American people that Donald J. Trump and MAGA Republicans pose a direct threat to the fabric of our republic. | ||
And then you put that together with how the FBI and others within the Biden administration directed social media companies to censor Americans and undermine our First Amendment rights because, of course, the social media companies don't want to be in a position to support the spread of domestic violent extremism. | ||
So when you look at all of these things together, you understand at its core the thing that I commit as the American people to root out, which is the weaponization and politicization of the intelligence community and national security state against the American people. | ||
This is so important, what she's talking about. | ||
It's not getting near enough attention, and I understand why, because it's one of those deals where you get the now, but you didn't get the what was supposed to come next. | ||
They were building these lists because they were getting ready to implement a social credit score. | ||
100%. | ||
It wasn't just about putting you on the list to punish you over one issue or the next, whether it's a mask, a vaccine, whatever it is. | ||
This was creating an entire new mechanism of a surveillance state of having you... | ||
They were getting ready to do this database. | ||
It might still exist. | ||
They claim they got rid of it. | ||
And, you know, they fired that censorship czar, that dingy woman, about four years ago. | ||
So the list may have gone with her. | ||
Maybe it still exists. | ||
This was supposed to be a permanent... | ||
They were using COVID and the vaccines as the starting point, but it would have been anything. | ||
It would have been anything in the future, and then eventually when they bring in the one world system of government, we'd already have the system in place. | ||
You wouldn't even know it. | ||
You'd already have been ranked on the social credit score. | ||
You wouldn't even have known it. | ||
So, it kind of gets shed in the wrong light where they say, oh, you're a domestic terrorist or you're a violent extremist. | ||
These were all just the classifications they used to leap the legal hurdles to do this. | ||
So they had to go with that angle because of the Patriot Act and everything else. | ||
They couldn't just say, oh, you're disobeying of government or you're critical of government. | ||
Or you spoke out against government. | ||
That's illegal. | ||
So they had to use it under the guise of you're a domestic extremist so that they could spy on you and put you on a list. | ||
Now, the Patriot Act extension is going to be up again in this congressional session. | ||
I hope they don't extend it this time because that's where all of this comes from. | ||
But the implications suggested here, this is not getting near enough attention. | ||
They were building the list for future purposes under the guise of domestic extremism. | ||
They know you're not a domestic extremist. | ||
They might call you it. | ||
They know it. | ||
This was all for legal reasons. | ||
Oh no, we had to spy on him and surveil him and put him on a list because he could be a terrorist. | ||
It's all BS. | ||
They were building the social credit score list, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
They were building it. | ||
That's what they were doing. | ||
And they would have used it however they saw fit. | ||
But eventually, that's where this was going. | ||
Oh, you have a bad social credit store. | ||
Sorry, can't rent your electric automatic cab driver today. | ||
Sorry, can't get access to energy today. | ||
Sorry, you're not going to get your meal stipend today. | ||
That's where all of this was going. | ||
And we beat it. | ||
I don't know if we could say we beat it permanently. | ||
In fact, I'd say no, just for the strategic reason we didn't beat it permanently. | ||
Because time marches on. | ||
But that's where this was going. | ||
That's the story here. | ||
So it wasn't about calling you a domestic terrorist. | ||
That was a disguise to start building this surveillance state social credit score system list. | ||
But the only way they could do it with the way the law stands and make it legal was to call you a domestic terrorist. | ||
unidentified
|
Now. | |
Bye. | ||
Of course, they loved to go after the January 6th defendants under this same guise. | ||
Now a lot of those U.S. attorneys are losing their jobs. | ||
Now, this video is going kind of viral. | ||
The video itself is kind of worthless, but I'm going to show you the video and then I'm going to tell you the larger takeaway here. | ||
This is a U.S. attorney who sent a bunch of January 6ers to prison. | ||
It's funny, this is not the one that sent me, even though she sounds exactly like it. | ||
I had to do a double take. | ||
I was like, wait a second. | ||
Was that the one that said that they wouldn't ask for jail time and then did, just totally lied to us, totally corrupt, and then told the judge that I should go to jail for my speech? | ||
Literally, it's in the transcripts. | ||
Is this the same one? | ||
No, they just sound and look the exact same. | ||
So listen to this video that in and of itself is, you know, kind of worthless other than, oh, look, here's a corrupt deep state attorney crying over losing her job. | ||
But I'm going to, after we watch a little bit of this, I'm going to tell you the real issue here and what's going on. | ||
And it ties into some other themes from today. | ||
But here's the crying former U.S. attorney clip 10. Actually, 11, guys. | ||
Yeah, 11. Sorry. | ||
unidentified
|
After three weeks of training and getting prepared for the next week, that Friday I left work. | |
I walked to the metro station. | ||
I got on the train and I pulled out my phone and I saw a litigation, a hole that had been put on it. | ||
And attached to that was a memo that gave Mr. Martin permission to fire probationary employees from the capital siege section that were moved to other places in the office. | ||
The memo referenced people, but didn't have a list of names attached. | ||
But the information provided was confusing. | ||
I knew I was probably on the list, but I didn't know exactly what was going on. | ||
I headed back to the office so I could figure out what was happening. | ||
I was met by my colleagues, who shared their confusion and heartbreak over this sudden event. | ||
We left the office, and two hours later, the letters started rolling and terminating us. | ||
At the end of the night, 15 U.S. attorneys, assistant U.S. attorneys, had been fired. | ||
The termination letter I received stated the decision was based on your actions and the prosecution of persons relating to the events that occurred at or near the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. | ||
An executive order issued by on January 20th, 2025. | ||
The president characterized that work as having involved a grave national injustice that has perpetrated upon the American people. | ||
That's actually one of the best things you've ever heard from this administration is that these attorneys that sent innocent people, nonviolent people to prison, including, of course, myself. | ||
So that's kind of the surface level thing to say, oh, look at this crying baby. | ||
And hey, this is great news. | ||
The Trump administration is punishing the corrupt attorneys that did this. | ||
That is truly great stuff. | ||
Some of the best stuff to come out of the administration, in my view. | ||
But what is the takeaway I'm getting here that I don't see anybody else talking about? | ||
Well, no. | ||
And it's the same thing from earlier. | ||
When we talk about the disconnect with Doge and everything else, it's all selfishness. | ||
It's all rooted in selfishness. | ||
First of all, you can get fired from any job at any time. | ||
Okay? | ||
So let's stop the sob story here. | ||
Let's stop the crocodile tears here. | ||
And I guarantee you, you're probably doing better. | ||
Than the vast majority of Americans with your federal lawyer job. | ||
So, no. | ||
There shouldn't be an ounce. | ||
There shouldn't be an ounce of sympathy for you. | ||
Not an ounce. | ||
But imagine, she's up here crying. | ||
unidentified
|
This soulless ghoul. | |
And that's what she is. | ||
This is a soulless ghoul who would gladly, gladly And she would use and abuse and rig the system, as corrupt as it is, against anybody to get that desired outcome of a conviction and prison time without any feelings, just totally disconnected from a fellow human. | ||
A soulless ghoul. | ||
But then as soon as she loses her job, all of a sudden she has human emotions. | ||
All of a sudden she's crying. | ||
All of a sudden she's heartbroken. | ||
You didn't give a damn about the people's lives you destroyed. | ||
Never, not even one time. | ||
I see this and I see the most selfish people I've ever seen in my life. | ||
Do you understand how dangerous this is? | ||
Again, it falls under the same line of, oh, we got to get these vaccines passed. | ||
We'll make a bunch of money. | ||
Well, what about the people that you harm? | ||
Doesn't even cross their minds. | ||
Doesn't even cross their minds. | ||
I need to get a bunch of convictions. | ||
I need to get a bunch of people in prison. | ||
What if they're innocent? | ||
What if they're nonviolent? | ||
Doesn't even cross their mind. | ||
Do you understand how selfish these people are? | ||
It's the entitlement. | ||
It's the selfishness. | ||
But then as soon as something goes wrong for them, now all of a sudden they have human emotions. | ||
Now all of a sudden they want sympathy. | ||
They want empathy. | ||
They want you to understand their side of the story. | ||
But when they're operating and doing their thing, there's nobody else in the world but them. | ||
Do you understand how dangerous that psychology is? | ||
Especially when put in the position of government power and influence? | ||
I've dealt with it, folks. | ||
I guarantee you, this woman wouldn't think twice. | ||
She wouldn't have an ounce of human emotion at all. | ||
Sympathy, empathy, anything. | ||
When she probably sent hundreds of people to prison and twisted and concocted and used the rigged corrupt system against the people she was going after, she probably put hundreds in prison, including on January 6th for their speech. | ||
And she did not feel an ounce of emotion because it was all about her. | ||
And it always was about her. | ||
It was never about justice. | ||
It was never about the judicial system, the case, the defendant. | ||
No, it was always about her. | ||
But now as soon as she's suffering, now she wants the human emotions. | ||
Now she wants the sympathy and the empathy and everybody to know about her struggles. | ||
These leftists are the most selfish, entitled people you have ever met in your life. | ||
And they are almost completely and maybe completely disconnected from reality and disconnected from their fellow human. | ||
These are ghouls. | ||
These are soulless ghouls that have been separated from us humans entirely. | ||
And now, they need to be separated from the government. | ||
Because we've seen what happens when they get in there. | ||
Alright, now this is ironic. | ||
Remember, it was Jen Psaki, she knew. | ||
This is why she left her job as the press secretary, because she knew the seriousness about Biden's condition, and she didn't want to be caught lying for the Biden administration. | ||
But it was too late, Jen. | ||
It was too late, and now she's trying to use her failing TV show as her podium to say, I wasn't a part of this. | ||
Well, we have the receipts, Jen, like this in clip 10. The President said today that he was sent here to look out for these working and middle-class families who are strained right now. | ||
So what should they read into him leaving now at this time of great... | ||
Well, first I would say, Peter, that I hope you're spending time with your family. | ||
I'm spending time with my family. | ||
I hope everybody in here is spending time with their families. | ||
This is a time to put politics aside. | ||
Spend time with your loved ones and talk about what you're grateful for. | ||
I will also tell you from spending some time working for this president and a past president that you are president no matter where you are. | ||
He will conduct his work from wherever he is on any vacation. | ||
Any time he is in Delaware, at Camp David, or wherever he may be spending time with his loved ones. | ||
He has secure phone capabilities. | ||
He has staff traveling with him. | ||
And I think the American people can be assured that he will continue to press to lower their costs and ensure they have more breathing room. | ||
First, I wanna take a moment, though, to talk a bit about something important. | ||
And that's something hopefully you're all experiencing right now. | ||
Personal time. | ||
Hopefully this holiday weekend you're able to take some of your own personal time to reflect or be with family or friends or barbecuing or going to the pool or whatever you may be doing. | ||
If you have kids like me, personal time is very hard to come by. | ||
I certainly cherish it. | ||
However, there is at least one person who is generally not afforded the privilege of personal time. | ||
And that person is the president of the United States, no matter who they are. | ||
And before you feel bad for any moment, This is what presidents sign up for, all of them. | ||
There are no on or off buttons for national crises or the all-encompassing responsibility of the presidency. | ||
So when Biden spends 40% of his time as president on vacation, Jen Psaki says, hey, he gets personal time, too. | ||
He's a human, too. | ||
He gets his personal time. | ||
We all get our personal time. | ||
Leave him alone. | ||
President Trump takes a weekend for Memorial Day. | ||
It's, the president doesn't get personal time. | ||
The president doesn't get time off. | ||
We can't afford the president to take days off. | ||
This is unacceptable. | ||
Oh, Jen. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, Jen. | |
You were so close, Jen. | ||
You were so close. | ||
But you made the pivotal mistake. | ||
You see, You stuck around too long. | ||
You did too many press conferences. | ||
You lied and carried the water for the Biden administration for too long. | ||
You can't. | ||
No. | ||
No. | ||
It's too late for you. | ||
You were part of the cover-up. | ||
It's too late for you, Jen. | ||
You tried. | ||
You were so close. | ||
But just not close enough. | ||
And I know, Jen. | ||
I know. | ||
I know you have to play the MSNBC game, which Trump literally cannot do anything good. | ||
Trump could go rescue 10 puppies from a house fire and, you know, you'd spin it to be a negative. | ||
So I get it, Jen. | ||
I really do. | ||
But you're going to sit here and insinuate Trump taking a day off on Memorial Day weekend equates to Joe Biden spending 40% of his time on vacation or getting cancer treatment or God knows what else. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Jen, the role of anti-Trump psychotic is already filled at MSNBC by Rachel Maddow. | ||
They don't need two of them. | ||
I know that's the angle you're going for here. | ||
But maybe try honesty. | ||
Just an idea. | ||
I don't know. | ||
Just maybe try honesty. | ||
You might be able to save some of those ratings. | ||
Just an idea. | ||
But you know what? | ||
Maybe the MSNBC leftist audience, maybe they don't like honesty. | ||
So I don't know. | ||
By the way, this is hilarious. | ||
From the New York Times. | ||
Someone named Zolan Kano Youngs. | ||
Well, that's one. | ||
Zolan. | ||
Trump casts himself as a protector of persecuted white people. | ||
Wait a second. | ||
You are the ones that cast Trump as that. | ||
You guys have been the ones talking about how Trump is only for white people and all about white people. | ||
They probably called him a white supremacist how many times? | ||
So for eight years, the media cast Trump as the big bad white guy because, you know, they saw all this anti-white discord everywhere. | ||
And then they indoctrinate children into the anti-white bigotry. | ||
So they're the ones making this whole culture of anti-white bigotry. | ||
And then they put Trump out there as he's the bad white guy, and they cast him as that. | ||
And now they say Trump's the one casting himself as the white protector. | ||
Okay. | ||
Okay. | ||
That's fun. | ||
Boy, that's fun. | ||
What other fun things do we have here? | ||
How about Trantifa? | ||
There was a Christian worship event at a city park in Seattle. | ||
And Trantifa came to shut it down. | ||
Let's check it out, shall we? | ||
unidentified
|
Clip 7. Hundreds of Christian worshippers flooded Seattle's Cal Anderson Park Saturday afternoon to pray for the city and take a stand for traditional family values. | |
You will not disrespect the blood of Jesus Christ! | ||
Especially against transgender ideology targeting children. | ||
All part of the Mayday USA revival movement sweeping across the nation. | ||
And the Lord says, sound the alarm! | ||
Sound the alarm! | ||
Lift up your voice! | ||
But a time of blessing and praise quickly devolved into chaos. | ||
Oh, here comes the training brigade. | ||
unidentified
|
Fascists go home! | |
Far-left activists. | ||
Oh, yes, fascists. | ||
unidentified
|
Militants tried to disrupt the concert. | |
Imagine you're up there singing, I love Jesus Christ, we love children. | ||
And they say, you're a fascist! | ||
unidentified
|
Menacing attendees and some activists even tried rushing the stage. | |
Throwing bottles of urine at worshippers. | ||
unidentified
|
There's kingdoms clashing here today. | |
There's the kingdom of God. | ||
Alright. | ||
Okay. | ||
See, yeah. | ||
Alright. | ||
Now, by the way, I just have to do this. | ||
I'm sorry, but it's just true. | ||
This isn't getting any national attention. | ||
Now, if this was a Jewish prayer event, you'd know it'd be the top story in the world about anti-Semitism. | ||
but since it's just Christians, we don't care that they get attacked by these terrorists. | ||
And are you going to hear... | ||
Check this out. | ||
Here we go. | ||
Baltimore reels from violent Memorial Day weekend with six points. | ||
And then another one, two dead in Memorial Day shooting in Baltimore. | ||
Hear anything about that? | ||
One dead, two injured in St. Louis shooting on Saturday. | ||
Nine-year-old boy died. | ||
Another 10-year-old shot. | ||
Hear anything about that? | ||
Memorial Day mass shooting in Philadelphia leaves two dead, nine injured. | ||
Man killed in an apartment by stray shot, D.C. police say. | ||
16-year-old in an apartment. | ||
Stray bullet. | ||
Chicago, 24 shot, three killed over Memorial Day weekend. | ||
Now you tell me. | ||
Have you heard anything about any of these? | ||
Will you hear anything about any of these? | ||
Will you hear anything about the victims of these? | ||
Will you hear anything about the children that got shot? | ||
No. | ||
Nope. | ||
This is just another weekend of violent crime in America that nobody's supposed to care about. | ||
And this isn't to take away from the shooting outside of the Jewish Museum and that poor, beautiful couple that got shot down. | ||
It's a horrible thing. | ||
But notice how they're going to make sure everybody knows about that. | ||
Everybody sees their faces. | ||
Everybody knows about them. | ||
They're going to have big events all around the world like in Israel. | ||
But for these innocent Americans, nothing. | ||
Why is that? | ||
Yeah, we keep seeing these transgender athletes. | ||
You know, boys beating girls in girls sports. | ||
So why even have girls sports? | ||
Yeah, we keep seeing this. | ||
Transgender athlete qualifies for two events in state track championships. | ||
You know, I keep... | ||
It's just my mind works this way. | ||
It's like solutions. | ||
What are the solutions? | ||
Is it to just let boys just take over girls' sports until there's no girls left and then say, okay, there you go. | ||
Or maybe you go the opposite direction and we just start telling the truth about that. | ||
There is no such thing as a trans person. | ||
It doesn't exist. | ||
It's made up. | ||
It's fake. | ||
It's like, if I go put... | ||
Am I a vampire? | ||
If I run around at night in a cape, am I a vampire all of a sudden? | ||
No. | ||
No, I'm pretending I'm something I'm not. | ||
It's the same thing with this trans crap. | ||
It doesn't exist. | ||
It's fake. | ||
We probably just shouldn't even have it anymore, not recognize it. | ||
Now, if you want to go out there and if you can find a psychotic freak doctor that wants to chop off your male member and sew it to the back of your neck, then okay, fine. | ||
More power to you. | ||
Shouldn't happen with anybody. | ||
Probably under 21. But maybe you could say 18. It's probably 21. But it doesn't exist. | ||
There's no such thing. | ||
But now you got all these kids that are forced to deal with this fake crap. | ||
So Trump posted this dealing with the transgender issue. | ||
California, under the leadership of radical left Democrat Gavin Newsom, continues to illegally allow men to play in women's sports. | ||
This week, a transitioned male athlete at a major event won everything and is now qualified to compete in the state finals next weekend. | ||
As a male, he was a less average competitor. | ||
This is not fair and totally demeaning to women and girls. | ||
Please be hereby advised that the large-scale federal funding will be held back, maybe permanently, if the executive order on this subject matter is not adhered to. | ||
The governor himself said it is unfair. | ||
I will speak to him today to find out which way he wants to go. | ||
In the meantime, I am ordering local authorities, if necessary, to not allow the transition person to compete in the state finals. | ||
This is totally ridiculous. | ||
I'm telling you, that's the card here, folks. | ||
Just cut the federal funding. | ||
These states will collapse. | ||
If you cut the federal funding and the SALT deductions, do you understand? | ||
I don't know if there's really a single blue state that wouldn't go under. | ||
I mean, certainly you'd see the big three fall. | ||
California, Illinois, and New York would all fall. | ||
They would fall within a week. | ||
They would go under financially. | ||
So let's do it. | ||
But I get it. | ||
This is part of the art of the deal, how Trump negotiates. | ||
He doesn't want to see these states collapse. | ||
But it's like, hey, you know I can collapse you tomorrow, right? | ||
Stop letting boys play in girls' sports, please. | ||
And they just can't even help themselves, these freaks. | ||
They can't even help themselves. | ||
All right. | ||
We're about to be joined by Taylor Lorenz. | ||
I wasn't aware. | ||
She's a big free speech advocate. | ||
Did you know that? | ||
I certainly didn't. | ||
So she's got a big issue right now with the free speech from the Trump administration issue. | ||
So I said, okay, I'm a free speech advocate. | ||
Been to jail for my speech, so I'll hear your side of the story. | ||
So she's going to explain what her issues with the Take It Down Act are. | ||
And then I got some other things I'll bring up with her, too. | ||
That's coming up shortly. | ||
Folks, remember to continue to support us by shopping at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
This is your daily reminder, by the way, to take your Optimal Human drink mix. | ||
If you're not, if you have it by now, now is the time to do it. | ||
If you've not tried it, we suggest you give it a try by purchasing one right now, one canister at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
I've got mine right here on my desk. | ||
I don't even have enough time to give you all the supplement facts here. | ||
Over 100% some of your vitamins here. | ||
But this thing is just loaded. | ||
Vitamin A, vitamin B6, B12, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin K. Those are just the vitamins. | ||
Not to mention you've got riboflavin, biotin, more than 1,000% biotin. | ||
So many people are biotin deficient. | ||
Calcium, iron, and that's not even getting into the different blends in here. | ||
The nutrient-wrench superfood blend, the immune antioxidant blend. | ||
The gut health and digestive support blend, the adaptogen blend, the nootropic and cognitive function blend, the liver health and detox blend, the cardiovascular and heart health blend, and the joint support blend. | ||
All of it in one scoop of optimal human superfood drink mix at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
Subscribe to this product and get a discount. | ||
All right, joining me now is Taylor Lorenz. | ||
And by the way, before I get into the subject material with her, We had a little back and forth on X over the extended weekend. | ||
And a lot of people were surprised. | ||
I said, no, I'm going to have her on my show. | ||
And they were surprised. | ||
Like, oh, well, it is rare that people on the left and the right come together for either a healthy debate or discussion. | ||
And this is a sign of good, healthy politics, by the way. | ||
So I'm glad Taylor was willing to join me here. | ||
I wish more people on her side of the aisle would. | ||
But maybe I don't know where she stands. | ||
Maybe I was wrong about where she stands with her side of the aisle. | ||
I was surprised that she was taking a stand for a free speech issue that she has right now with the Trump administration. | ||
So Taylor, joining me now, the Take It Down Act, you have a problem with this. | ||
Why? | ||
Yeah, well, the Take It Down Act is this law that ostensibly is for preventing revenge porn. | ||
This is stuff that obviously we all think that is bad, right? | ||
But what it does is it allows anybody to essentially report And the platforms will take it down. | ||
So basically, there's not enough verification that the content actually meets the bar for NCII before the platforms have to remove it. | ||
It only gives the platforms, I think it's something like a 48-hour window. | ||
And so obviously, this has deep free speech concerns. | ||
And I talk about this on my YouTube channel with Becca Branham from the Center for Democracy and Technology, because it will basically allow people to report content as NCII and potentially lead to it get taken. | ||
It getting taken down without it actually meeting the bar for that type of stuff. | ||
It sort of puts the onus on tech companies to take down content. | ||
So you mean like government pressure for tech people to take stories down? | ||
I mean, I think the concern is that it could be used to censor journalistic content. | ||
Trump has already talked. | ||
And I just want to be clear. | ||
This is not just a Trump thing. | ||
This censorship that we see coming from the federal government is... | ||
Trump has been atrocious for free speech, atrocious. | ||
But Biden was also atrocious for free speech. | ||
Unfortunately, we both agree on the Biden issue. | ||
OK, so we're in agreement there. | ||
So let's let's focus on the Trump issue. | ||
Aside from the Take It Down Act, we'll get into that in a second. | ||
But what else has Trump done? | ||
You say he's atrocious for free speech. | ||
How so? | ||
Well, I mean, I think I care so much about free speech online. | ||
So I can talk to you about some of the sort of federal legislation that we're seeing from Republican members of Congress working together with Democrats to push things like the Kids Online Safety Act. | ||
This is pushed by Marsha Blackburn, a Republican, along with Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat. | ||
You constantly see Democrats and Republicans coming together to create this. | ||
essentially, under the guise of cracking down on big tech. | ||
I would argue these laws don't crack down on big tech. | ||
In terms of Trump himself and free speech, I think we've seen him threaten journalists. | ||
He put Brendan Carr in charge of the FCC. | ||
Brendan Carr is like a censorship king. | ||
I mean, this man wants to basically censor media companies. | ||
And so I just, yeah, I don't see him as being a very pro-free speech president, unfortunately. | ||
He's also, you know, totally OK with arresting college protests. | ||
I would sacrifice that point. | ||
I think your characterization of Brendan Carr is inaccurate. | ||
But I would sacrifice the speech on campuses is overreach. | ||
These ideas that we need to have laws against anti-Semitic speech is beyond overreach. | ||
And it's, quite frankly, antithetical to the First Amendment. | ||
So that is a huge issue from the Trump administration. | ||
But I think, as you'll find, if you aren't already aware, the AIPAC-controlled lobby in Congress, that's how they get this stuff through. | ||
And I would also say for the right wing, defending Israel or taking a stand against anti-Semitism, that's basically Black Lives Matter for conservatives. | ||
They just do it to virtue signal, I think. | ||
I think honestly that everyone in the federal government is way too comfortable censoring journalistic speech online. | ||
And that's something I care deeply about and cover a lot on my YouTube channel. | ||
So look at, for instance, what Congress is trying to do right now where they're talking about repealing or quote-unquote reforming Section 230. | ||
That should terrify all of us. | ||
This is a landmark piece of legislation that protects the right to free expression online by not putting liability on the platforms for the speech that they host. | ||
We don't want to repeal Section 230. | ||
Why is it that there's so much bipartisan support for stuff like this? | ||
I also did a YouTube video recently on a state law in Utah, where obviously Utah is notorious for all of these bad speech regulations, things like the Social Media Regulation Act that was overturned, thank God, on free speech grounds. | ||
But now they're pushing these new laws aimed at cracking down on child influencers. | ||
Basically putting tons of burdensome requirements on speech, lawful speech, journalistic content online, in an effort to sort of crack down on, basically take away young people's right to free speech on the internet. | ||
I hear you talking, and it sounds to me that really your approach to this is small government. | ||
Just get the government out of the process. | ||
I think when we talk about speech, we want to protect free speech online. | ||
And I think we've seen a huge rollback in speech protections online and off. | ||
Over the past several years, I think a huge amount of it has been ushered in by the Democrats and the tech lash and the way that they're pushing, again, things like the Kids Online Safety Act, an incredibly dangerous piece of legislation that should not be passed under any circumstances. | ||
You can go to my YouTube video and watch my conversation. | ||
Actually, it's going to be up on Friday with Ari Cohen, fires Ari Cohen, talking about this. | ||
But, you know, Republicans as well have been terrible for speech. | ||
It seems like the government wants to control a lot of speech online, and that should scare. | ||
Well, here's where I had an issue over the weekend with you. | ||
That's because when you talk about some of the stuff that's coming out where maybe I agree, maybe I don't. | ||
By the way, I do believe, and maybe that lady you interviewed might be involved. | ||
I do believe the Take It Down Act, some of its stuff, it's going to end up at the Supreme Court. | ||
Somebody's going to claim it's free speech to do this stuff. | ||
It's likely. | ||
We shouldn't pass these dangerous laws and count on the courts. | ||
But here's the problem. | ||
From where I'm standing, hold on, from where I'm standing, and if I'm wrong, you can correct me, where are any concrete examples? | ||
Because I can sit here and give a ton of concrete examples of how conservatives have actually been censored. | ||
I was put in prison for my speech. | ||
So where are actual examples of your issues for the Trump administration? | ||
Now, I understand getting ahead of it, but where are the actual examples of this going on outside of the college campuses? | ||
I sacrifice that point. | ||
Yeah, definitely. | ||
I mean, it is worth noting Trump has only been president for a short time. | ||
And the Take It Down Act, I believe, was just signed into law last week. | ||
And I don't even know if it's gone into effect yet. | ||
So again, with that specific piece of legislation, we haven't seen the bad outcomes yet. | ||
But we do see a lot of preemptive censoring of speech by these social platforms in effort to comply with the law. | ||
Shoshana, I'm going to butcher her last name, but Shoshana at R Street has done a great series. | ||
Again, bipartisan effort to essentially age gate the Internet. | ||
And what they want is to have it so that your offline identity is tied to your online behavior. | ||
And everybody has to basically like, you know, prevent your government, present your government ID to use certain social apps, visit certain websites. | ||
Not only is this a huge privacy violation and creates privacy concerns for young people, but it's it. | ||
And so, you know, these are things that are really dangerous that we're starting to see. | ||
We know the consequences of age verification. | ||
I think Shoshana outlines, you know, some of the concerns really well in her series, which you can find on the R Street blog. | ||
I'll find it. | ||
Her handle is Senator Shoshana. | ||
But these are things that, you know, all these people that want to yell all day about free speech on the Internet. | ||
Most of what they're yelling about is social media moderation. | ||
And I agree. | ||
Social media has moderated speech. | ||
But I do think there's a difference between saying, hey, we don't want people to know about Hunter Biden's laptop versus, hey, we want to maybe keep kids off the Internet or we want to stop people from posting deep-fate adult content. | ||
We don't want to keep kids off the Internet, though. | ||
Kids have a right to speech, too. | ||
And kids have a right to consume information. | ||
Well, here's a practical example. | ||
So would you agree? | ||
I know they did this in Texas. | ||
I don't know how many states, but basically, you can't go to any of these adult sites now. | ||
You have to basically verify. | ||
So now the traffic for them is way down, which is maybe concerning. | ||
Is that something you agree or disagree with? | ||
Absolutely disagree with, because again, you can't only verify children's ages, right? | ||
You can't only verify a child's age. | ||
You have to verify everyone's age, which means you have to collect more data on everyone. | ||
And basically tie, again, people's offline identity to their online behavior. | ||
That should concern all of us. | ||
There are huge problems with these age verification schemes. | ||
And not to mention, as Shoshana wrote very well recently as well, young people don't have driver's licenses. | ||
They don't have federal IDs often. | ||
And so often you're seeing these This is crazy. | ||
I mean, the beauty of the Internet and the beauty of the web really is that it's an open web. | ||
And I'm not for I'm not saying that we should have consequence free speech of people put out specific content that has, you know. | ||
I mean, the music stuff is a whole other side of it. | ||
But what I will say, if you want to deny the Sandy Hook massacre, for instance, you should be held accountable for that sort of stuff. | ||
unidentified
|
But the most important thing- Okay. | |
Certainly, you just realized how hypocritical you are. | ||
I mean, I don't think that you should have consequence-free speech, but we should be allowed to have an open dialogue. | ||
And I don't think that censorship is the best way. | ||
You are the one that just equated this to Sandy Hook, not me. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Well, I think Sandy Hook's a good example, right? | ||
No, it's not, actually. | ||
It's not a good example at all. | ||
And first of all, I wasn't even here during Sandy Hook. | ||
But this is why it's not a good example, Taylor. | ||
Okay? | ||
Let's hear it. | ||
The government says you need to take a vaccine, and then I say, hey, the vaccine is going to give you a heart attack and kill you. | ||
Should I be allowed to say that? | ||
Well, what do vaccines have to do with Sandy Hook? | ||
Well, because you're sitting here saying we should have an open dialogue, but I guess you're saying if you say something that is wrong or you're skeptical of an event, that you should be punished. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
unidentified
|
Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. | |
No, no, no, no. | ||
That's not what I said. | ||
Please don't put words in my mouth. | ||
Literally what you just said, but okay. | ||
Not what I said. | ||
It's not what I said. | ||
I'm saying that if you, for instance, post something that's incitement to violence where you're threatening, you're directly threatening someone or you're directly targeting someone, that's dangerous, right? | ||
I've dealt with stopping. | ||
unidentified
|
You didn't say that. | |
You didn't give an example of that. | ||
Well, I'll give you an example now, right? | ||
If you're posting content that's directly threatening someone, we have legal processes in place to deal with that. | ||
I am all for people. | ||
If people want to hate on me online all day long, that's totally fine. | ||
They can even say false things about me online. | ||
I would protect their right to say that. | ||
We don't want to have a complete free-for-all where, again, our... | ||
Of course, we have some, you know, certain, just the way that we don't want an entire internet like overrun with child porn, we should allow law enforcement to investigate that stuff. | ||
But, you know, it's interesting you bring up vaccines. | ||
I wrote a story for the Washington Post a couple of years ago about Because again, there was that government pressure and I think media pressure to censor information about long COVID and about COVID's harm. | ||
So I am all for it. | ||
I am a vaccine advocate. | ||
I do a lot of outreach. | ||
I think the most harmful thing you can do when you're talking about vaccines is not acknowledge side effects, not talk to people about vaccine limitations. | ||
So I have always advocated for very, very. | ||
You didn't give me a practical example. | ||
So let me give you two practical examples here to just compare and contrast, okay? | ||
And you're the one that brought up Sandy Hook. | ||
So obviously you're aware of what they've done to Alex and Infowars over Sandy Hook. | ||
I'm going to assume that that's okay. | ||
Okay. | ||
What's a bigger issue? | ||
If Alex Jones goes on air and says things about Sandy Hook like he doesn't believe it happened, or if somebody is intentionally removing vaccine information from the internet that ends up getting people killed, that actually ends up harming people, what do you think is more dangerous? | ||
I think there's harm in both of those situations, right? | ||
I asked you what you thought was more dangerous. | ||
I don't even know how you would quantify that. | ||
Yeah, you do. | ||
You do. | ||
Say it. | ||
Say it. | ||
You know it's true. | ||
I think that people are harmed in both those situations, right? | ||
I mean, we want, again, I don't think that the antidote to misinformation... | ||
God, I don't remember. | ||
Oh, isn't that funny? | ||
Of course you don't, because they want everybody to think Alex did it. | ||
So everybody knows Alex Jones and Sandy Hook. | ||
So here's my point. | ||
People actually died from the COVID vaccines, Taylor. | ||
Sorry, what? | ||
People actually died from the COVID-19 vaccines. | ||
I'm sure you believe that. | ||
And again, I would protect your right to talk about those things. | ||
But I think that what you seem to be doing, and I think what a lot of people that talk online about free speech do, is they sort of fixate on these specific examples of social media moderation while ignoring the much bigger issue, which is the federal government enacting broad-based censorship laws that will actually prevent freedom of speech. | ||
On so many of these platforms. | ||
I mean, I'm a huge advocate for reproductive justice. | ||
We've seen reproductive justice related content censored across especially platforms like Meta preemptively, not because there's any law in place, but because in states like Texas and elsewhere, they're attempting to put laws in space in place that would basically allow people. | ||
It would help criminalize speech. | ||
And so you see that chilling effect. | ||
Now, I cover misinformation and I've debunked a lot of misinformation. | ||
I don't believe personally that the way to effectively counter misinformation. | ||
Is by top-down censorship from the government, because we know that the government itself can push misinformation. | ||
So I think that we need to have a more open and accessible media environment that allows for free discourse of ideas. | ||
And I think we need to protect an open internet. | ||
We need to protect... | ||
And when you see these bills, like, again, people talking about repealing Section 230, or you see people talk about the Kids Online Safety Act, I just don't see a lot of conservatives out there advocating against it. | ||
And my question to you, I guess, is why? | ||
You guys talk all day about free speech, but you don't seem to be involved in any of the efforts to challenge, you know, really scary censorship laws that are, by the way, bipartisan. | ||
Well, I don't think it's as scary as you have. | ||
But, I mean, in my defense, I said this would go to the Supreme Court. | ||
I said this was a free speech issue the day that Trump signed it. | ||
I mean, I guess I would push back on that in the sense that the government censoring speech is a much more serious issue, I would say, than platform moderation because platforms come and go. | ||
But these laws are going to shape the next generation of platforms. | ||
If they repeal Section 230, that will devastate the Internet. | ||
We will not have a—the whole Internet will look like Netflix. | ||
It'll be censored. | ||
We don't want that. | ||
Or there'll be open platforms where there's no moderation and there's just, you know— I get your concerns. | ||
I'm not in a disagreement over your concerns. | ||
But again, you're dealing in things that haven't happened. | ||
We've had actual practical cases of censorship. | ||
I went to prison for my speech, Taylor. | ||
Oh, I understand. | ||
But listen, I want to be clear. | ||
We're not talking about things that haven't happened. | ||
We are talking about things that are happening right now. | ||
Reproductive justice content is being censored right now. | ||
LGBTQ content is being censored right now. | ||
unidentified
|
What's that? | |
What's reproductive justice content? | ||
Information about abortion, information about women's reproductive health. | ||
Like what? | ||
Again, information on how to get abortions, information on reproductive health. | ||
What do you mean information on how to get an abortion? | ||
Where isn't a shortage of that? | ||
Well, unfortunately, in states like Texas, and I have another video about this as well on my channel, they're trying to restrict online content about media. | ||
So that people cannot freely access information about abortion online. | ||
That's a concern. | ||
Whether you support abortion or don't, you should be able to access that information. | ||
I've not seen or heard anything about it. | ||
Can you give me an example? | ||
I totally agree. | ||
This is the problem is that I think a lot of these people that are ostensibly interested, and I believe that they are genuinely interested in free speech, are not paying attention to these. | ||
But you're not giving me an example. | ||
I say I have an issue with Facebook, Twitter, everybody, YouTube, censoring conservatives. | ||
I can give you thousands of examples. | ||
I can give you the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
I can give you COVID. | ||
I'm telling you, where are your examples here? | ||
What am I supposed to chew on? | ||
Sure thing. | ||
I mean, well, are you looking for like specific, I mean, basically what happens- Taylor, you are the one that says reproductive justice is being censored. | ||
I will tell you, I have had my own content censored. | ||
I can only speak to my own experiences, and I don't want to just put random people. | ||
I will say the Electronic Frontier Foundation has a really great effort, and I think Fight for the Future as well. | ||
But they have this great effort at the EFF where they're collecting stories of censorship related to reproductive justice. | ||
So if you or anybody out there has seen examples. | ||
So you don't have any examples is what you're telling me. | ||
I can tell you my own examples. | ||
I've had a lot of experience with meta-censoring my content. | ||
I've lost multiple Instagram accounts because of it. | ||
I've dealt with this myself. | ||
For what? | ||
What did you post? | ||
What have I posted? | ||
I posted a lot of progressive speech. | ||
Pro-Palestinian content. | ||
I've posted information about COVID-19 that has been taken down that's factual. | ||
I've had my information that's factual about COVID-19 taken off TikTok. | ||
So I understand. | ||
Trust me. | ||
I understand. | ||
And I feel your frustration. | ||
I think as somebody that uses social media very heavily and reports online, reports on content creators and independent media, I know how frustrating it can be. | ||
And I would say what's even more frustrating, not even just the stuff taken down, because at least when it's taken down, you have a clear method of appeal or you at least know that that content is being restricted. | ||
What also frustrates me is the way that this content is shadow banned in detail. | ||
Look at the speech of pro-journalists in Palestine that have had their accounts restricted. | ||
Motaz has talked about this a lot. | ||
Look at Amir al-Khattabi, who just had his entire account restricted at Muslim. | ||
Where was that? | ||
What account? | ||
What platform? | ||
At Muslim. | ||
I wrote about this on my sub stack as well. | ||
At Muslim. | ||
What platform? | ||
Which is the biggest Muslim news page on Instagram. | ||
Instagram? | ||
Yeah. | ||
Is recently banned from all of India with no effort, no ability to appeal. | ||
No ability to appeal. | ||
This is an audience. | ||
So that's not even in America? | ||
Not in America. | ||
But again, it's an American account. | ||
He's based here. | ||
This is an American account. | ||
But he's not banned here. | ||
He's been restricted here, and he's suffered a lot of account restrictions. | ||
He's suffered shadowbending. | ||
He can't monetize. | ||
He's had his account downranked and censored. | ||
It's been a huge problem. | ||
And he's not the only one. | ||
There's plenty of pro-Palestinian journalists and journalists actually in Palestine that have had their content censored on TikTok and on Instagram. | ||
So we know that pro-Palestinian speech is being censored across the Internet. | ||
That should scare people, again, because we want a free speech. | ||
Taylor, here's my problem. | ||
I've been reporting on that. | ||
So we're in agreement here. | ||
But on some of these other issues, I feel like you're lost in an empty room. | ||
I mean, you realize if you want to stand up for free speech, you're talking to the guy right now. | ||
You're talking to the platform. | ||
There hasn't been a more censored platform in America than Infowars. | ||
Where does your stand for Infowars? | ||
What I would like to see from the Infowars audience, which I don't think is currently happening, and I would say this, I'm sure we disagree on so many political things. | ||
I saw you guys saying something about trans people. | ||
I support trans rights. | ||
There's a lot that we disagree with. | ||
I know, we're probably going to disagree on a lot. | ||
Well, there's no such thing as trans rights, but yeah, okay. | ||
Okay, we're going to agree to disagree on that. | ||
What I would say is that if you guys, if your audience does support free speech, and I do believe that they do, I would really encourage them to learn about some of these laws, primarily laws, by the way, that are often written and pushed by Democrats. | ||
Biden banned TikTok. | ||
Let's not forget that. | ||
Obviously, Gallagher, a Republican, was heavily involved in that, but so was Mark Warner, a Democrat. | ||
Again, we see a lot of these bipartisan efforts. | ||
to restrict speech. | ||
And I really encourage the Infowars audience to get involved in these legislative efforts to protect free expression online. | ||
And yes, that means sometimes you are going to protect the rights of people that you don't agree with to speak freely online. | ||
I will always fight for people that I don't agree with to speak freely online. | ||
But I just want to see them learn a little bit more about these laws. | ||
Learn about the Kids Online Safety Act. | ||
Yes, it hasn't gone into effect yet, but we don't want to pass bad laws. | ||
That will ultimately probably lead to censorship. | ||
You're on. | ||
Again, you're walking in an empty room right now. | ||
unidentified
|
All right. | |
Hold on. | ||
Hold right there. | ||
I'm going to keep you over. | ||
I'm glad you agree. | ||
I'm happy to hear that you agree with me. | ||
All right. | ||
Free speech queen. | ||
The queen of free speech. | ||
One of the biggest advocates ever, ever that I've ever heard of. | ||
Taylor Lorenz. | ||
I am being a bit facetious, Taylor, in case you didn't pick up on that. | ||
I'm going to clip that. | ||
I'm going to clip that. | ||
Yeah, well, you should. | ||
I'll send you the invoice for the royalties. | ||
No, I'm kidding. | ||
It's all for use. | ||
It's all for use here. | ||
All right, here's my problem, and I know you have some examples you want to bring up. | ||
Here's my problem. | ||
I feel like you're sitting here dealing with betta fish, like these tiny little fish that swim around and barely have a life at all, where I have a shark in my ass right now. | ||
No, I'm talking about free speech issues. | ||
I'm talking about free speech issues. | ||
unidentified
|
No, no, no. | |
I'm talking about free speech issues. | ||
If I had my way, the government would be about as big as a beta fish. | ||
I'm talking about free speech issues. | ||
I'm talking about the fact that we have had people go to jail for things they said, like Douglas Mackey. | ||
I'm talking about the fact we've had entire stories censored from the Internet at the behest of the Biden regime. | ||
And I don't agree with that. | ||
Okay, but what I'm saying is you start to talk about these things, but you don't have any concrete examples yet. | ||
So what's the problem with making people show their ID so that they can go watch adult content on the Internet? | ||
What's the problem? | ||
Okay, let's go through the problems. | ||
And I think Shoshana at R Street really did a good job of breaking this down. | ||
Age verification is a nightmare. | ||
We do not want- We're talking about this specific example for viewing adult content. | ||
Generally speaking, we're both against age verification on the internet. | ||
Okay, and so, right, and so what you think is that you're okay with adult content being age-gated and censored, and you don't think that that's going to open the door for censorship and age verification across the board? | ||
And I just want to tell you- It hasn't. | ||
It hasn't because they're trying to push these laws through now. | ||
Let me tell you something. | ||
I was at the White House last year, and again, this is under Biden, but this should scare you because this is under Biden. | ||
I was at the White House in a room full of content creators, big content creator day, hundreds of content creators. | ||
Neera Tanden, Biden admin official, got up on stage and said, don't you wish you could unmask every troll? | ||
Don't you wish you could remove anonymity from the internet? | ||
Raise your hand if you'd want to remove anonymity from the internet. | ||
And all of these content creators who Don't know any better, I guess. | ||
Raise their hand. | ||
That's terrifying. | ||
We don't want to remove anonymity from the internet. | ||
Can I ask you, was there a single right winger amongst them? | ||
No, because it was Biden and they were inviting... | ||
Okay, got you. | ||
Well, I would again, I have said from the jump, this is a bipartisan problem. | ||
And I and I implore left. | ||
Nobody in the Trump administration is saying, I want to de-mask everyone on the internet. | ||
Brendan Carr has advocated for, I mean, I know you and I disagree on the FCC. | ||
I think that they have taken a way too active role in trying to control speech online. | ||
I mean, I will say that the speech stuff that we're seeing from Republicans, look at what Mike Gallagher did in Congress, a Republican, pushed the TikTok ban, one of the biggest assaults on speech that we've seen in a while. | ||
Again, I think maybe Trump himself might not be talking about tech policy as often, but let's not act like Republicans. | ||
And Democrats aren't co-sponsoring all of these bills together. | ||
Marsha Blackburn, again, a Republican. | ||
No, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
That's fair. | ||
That's a fair criticism. | ||
However, this is a culture of the left. | ||
This isn't the culture of the right wing. | ||
It's the culture of the left to censor free speech. | ||
What I will give you is that I think liberals under Trump's first term, and by the way, I was very critical about this and I've remained critical about this. | ||
I think that liberals under Trump's first term blamed Social platforms for Trump's rise and sought to exert a greater amount of control over speech online. | ||
And this is where you saw the sort of panic about misinformation, which is we do want a better information environment. | ||
I don't think top-down censorship gets us there. | ||
But I do think that yes, we saw broad-based advocacy for censorship online. | ||
And even to this day, I think liberals However, what I would say is that a lot of the conservatives out there that talk a big game about being pro-free speech are only pro-free speech for the speech that they like. | ||
They're only pro-free speech for the speech that they like. | ||
And I don't see them out there advocating for speech that they disagree with. | ||
And I would say I really appreciate organizations like FIRE and the ACLU and, honestly, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, these other organizations that have done a really good- I know, I know, we don't, I know, I know how they have been. | ||
But what I will say is that they have done a good job on some stuff of sort of basically backing, criticizing these bipartisan- Well, the only, is there another, the only example I can- What I can see here is on the anti-Semitism stuff. | ||
That's the only example where I see the conservatives being against free speech. | ||
I mean, that's the biggest example, but I gave you several other examples of it. | ||
You gave me potentials. | ||
No, no, no, no, no. | ||
Right now, right now, reproductive justice content is being censored. | ||
I encourage you to put up that form that the EFF has. | ||
Okay, so you think, okay, now you might believe this. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I'm not even going to take a stance. | ||
I'm going to ask you. | ||
Do you think, okay, abortion is illegal in Texas. | ||
Do you think somebody should be able to go online and say, hey, here's where you can get an illegal abortion? | ||
Abortion's not illegal in Texas. | ||
Completely illegal? | ||
It's not completely illegal. | ||
I think it's under a lot of restrictions. | ||
It's not completely illegal. | ||
My point is, do you think, let's say it's almost completely illegal. | ||
I'm glad that you're willing to admit that it's not totally illegal because some leftists say they can't. | ||
I do think that there are restrictions on it. | ||
Hold on, hold on. | ||
Let's not get lost in the morass of the abortion debate. | ||
I'm asking you. | ||
Yes, I believe people should be able to access information online about abortion. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
Should somebody be able to say, here's where you can get an illegal abortion? | ||
Let's say you've got six months pregnant, a woman's in Texas, I want to get an abortion. | ||
Should somebody be providing abortions in Texas illegally and promoting it online? | ||
Should somebody be providing abortions illegally and promoting it online? | ||
I would consider information about medical information about, you know, it sort of depends on the type of content, right? | ||
So it's a little hard to speculate, but I believe in protecting people's speech online, and I would, in that instance, protect people. | ||
Well, this is the only practical example that I can figure that you're trying to get to. | ||
Well, I think the abortion thing, let me just clarify why I'm saying what I'm saying, too. | ||
The internet doesn't stop at certain states. | ||
And so I think when we see the criminalization of speech and we see things like, oh, well, this is only happening in Texas or whatever, the internet is not bound by state lines. | ||
And so the result of a lot of this legislation is that it's not, though. | ||
Yeah, it is. | ||
If you come to Texas and you try to go to an adult website, you will be blocked. | ||
Right. | ||
You can block specific websites. | ||
But for instance, let's talk about Instagram. | ||
Instagram doesn't block certain content in Texas versus Missouri. | ||
It just doesn't. | ||
You might be more likely to receive certain content based on your geography on platforms like TikTok and Instagram and stuff, but it's not blocking that. | ||
We thankfully have a pretty open internet between state lines. | ||
What we see is we see, and especially this is a problem in Utah, which I've covered a lot. | ||
Utah has some of the worst internet bills. | ||
But you see these sort of more restrictive speech laws coming out of the states, like Texas, like Utah. | ||
And the concern is that Like, they will default to the strictest state law. | ||
And so we don't really want any of these states to create these restrictive speech laws. | ||
Well, look, I need you to land this plane because we're still dealing in the hypotheticals here, okay? | ||
You want to know why? | ||
We shouldn't have age verification? | ||
I can run through why. | ||
No, no, no. | ||
Again, I'm with you on that. | ||
I don't want an internet ID. | ||
We're both against that. | ||
But adult content is supposed to be for 18 and up. | ||
So you obviously agree that children should not be watching Pornhub. | ||
Of course we don't want children doing that. | ||
So how are you going to stop that? | ||
I think the way, again, I think the way to counteract that, the same way that you don't want kids to go off and buy a Playboy, you know, magazine or whatever, right? | ||
Like, I do think that there are ways to counteract How do you do that? | ||
That aren't broad-based age verification schemes from the internet providers. | ||
Okay, so if I go to buy a Playboy, I have to show an ID. | ||
Right, right. | ||
And that's a little different because you're purchasing the physical media, whereas Pornhub, I believe, is free. | ||
It's like an open platform. | ||
I'm sure you know. | ||
You go to the awards in a mask, Taylor. | ||
unidentified
|
I won the awards. | |
I should know this. | ||
That's true. | ||
I think it's like it is an open platform. | ||
I just don't know if they do offer paid content or whatever. | ||
But either way, my point is, is that we don't. | ||
My bigger issue is with social media age verification, which is what Republicans and Democrats have both been pushing for. | ||
And I think we can all agree. | ||
That social media content, and generally, we do not want Meta or Google or X having to age, basically not allowing young people to access it or restricting young people's experience so much that they can. | ||
I would agree on that. | ||
But I think then, since this is kind of just a general conversation, but I think X needs to ban adult material from its website. | ||
There shouldn't be any adult material on X. It needs to be completely gotten rid of. | ||
It should be illegal. | ||
Okay. | ||
Well, illegal? | ||
unidentified
|
I don't know. | |
I mean by X to standards. | ||
I don't mean by law. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, okay. | |
You can't put it on YouTube, so why should we have it on X? | ||
I think this is a big, I mean, I covered Tumblr a lot, and this is something that Tumblr went through too. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I mean, I think all of these platforms, the reason why a lot of platforms end up removing NSFW content is because of moderation issues, because they can't necessarily moderate it effectively. | ||
And we have seen that X has struggled as they've laid off a lot of people to moderate, you know. | ||
Again, NCII content out. | ||
But speaking of X, I mean, talk about a platform that's hypocritical about free speech. | ||
You have Elon Musk coming in saying, we're bringing free speech. | ||
We're bringing free speech. | ||
What's the first thing he does? | ||
He bans a bunch of journalists, including myself, simply for reporting on him. | ||
So I don't think X is as free speech. | ||
You got banned from X? | ||
Yes. | ||
I saw you on X. That's how I connected to you. | ||
Now I'm back. | ||
You know why? | ||
Because the law, the rule that Elon tried to ban me of was overturned in the EU. | ||
Remember he tried to pass that rule where you couldn't promote links to external platforms, and I was promoting my Instagram and Substack, and I was banned. | ||
Yeah, that was a personal vendetta against you, for sure. | ||
Yeah, but that's what I'm saying. | ||
Like, we shouldn't have these platforms where these tech CEOs have their personal vendettas or personal things. | ||
Oh, yeah, that's right. | ||
You were doxing people. | ||
No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
Absolutely not. | ||
Never have I doxed anyone. | ||
Never have I doxed. | ||
You've never doxed anyone ever. | ||
You've never put any private information about anybody out there against their will? | ||
Private information? | ||
No. | ||
No. | ||
Did I say that Chaya Rychuk was running lives at TikTok? | ||
Yes. | ||
Let's not forget what her handle was before, by the way, which was public information. | ||
But you guys are like friends now, right? | ||
You had a cry over some coffee, didn't you? | ||
I didn't see anyone cry during that meeting. | ||
Well, how could I? | ||
You got a damn mask on your face. | ||
I know. | ||
Well, I'm immunocompromised. | ||
I would love, if Chaya wants to do another interview with me, I am all ears. | ||
I would love for her to sit for another interview. | ||
You could. | ||
You could ask her about that Epstein binder that she was showing off to the world. | ||
I would love to ask her about the Epstein binder. | ||
Yeah. | ||
I think, talk about a hypocrite, about free speech. | ||
I think a lot of these people that go off and talk about free speech, again, I just want to see them get involved in fighting these things. | ||
Well, here's what I'm going to say. | ||
Here's what I want to say, because I just want to move on to a couple other things. | ||
If you can bring me a concrete example where the Take It Down Act is applied in an anti-free speech, anti-First Amendment, then I will take that stand. | ||
I'm not going to sit here and take a stand against people using deep fake porn against people. | ||
Absolutely not that's wrong. | ||
If you can show me an example where age verification, ID verification is abused, then I will certainly take that stand with you. | ||
But to me, in the world of free speech issues, Taylor, in the world of free speech issues, it's not even on the radar yet. | ||
Again, this is the federal government. | ||
This is so much bigger than the content moderation stuff that you guys fight about. | ||
I really encourage you to go to Shoshana. | ||
Man, I hope she pays you well for all this promotion. | ||
Shoshana Weissman, because she does great work. | ||
Shoshana Weissman. | ||
It has a great series on our street that details the problems. | ||
Taylor, I'm sorry. | ||
I'm not going to be lectured by anybody about a free speech advocate. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
I'm a bigger free speech advocate than your friend and yourself combined. | ||
All right? | ||
So I've been through the ringer. | ||
You asked for examples and I'm just telling you where to look for examples. | ||
Exactly. | ||
But when you have the real world examples. | ||
Then I will take those cases up. | ||
There are real-world examples in Shoshana's series. | ||
You can go through it. | ||
Shoshana isn't here. | ||
I'm talking to Taylor Lorenz. | ||
Give Shoshana a call, guys. | ||
Okay, let's pull up her series. | ||
I think one thing that you are looking for, which I agree with you with the Take It Down Act specifically, is that we haven't legally challenged that law yet, right? | ||
Because it just passed. | ||
So you're right. | ||
Either way, I would say, or just more broadly, what I would say is that we don't want to pass dangerous speech laws and then try to force the courts to challenge them in hopes that it gets struck down and hopes that we find the right example to challenge them. | ||
Well, that's fair. | ||
I'd say that's fair. | ||
I do think it all ends up at the Supreme Court, and I think that there's going to be a new thing of digital identity theft. | ||
Well, this is how it goes, Taylor. | ||
I mean, this is how it works. | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
There's going to be something eventually called digital identity theft. | ||
I've actually already sued successfully for people that steal my identity online and basically make fake accounts and then sell something under my name. | ||
We've successfully sued and shut that down. | ||
I think it'll be something similar with this AI stuff. | ||
Eventually, these cases will end up at the Supreme Court. | ||
But let's have a little more fun here before we let you go. | ||
Final minutes of the show here. | ||
Can you tell me what trans rights are? | ||
Yeah, I mean, so again, as somebody that believes in personal liberties, right? | ||
I believe in personal liberties. | ||
I believe that you have the right to express your gender identity or wear whatever the hell you want. | ||
If you want to call yourself by a different name or you want to change your gender, I believe that you should have the personal right to do that. | ||
And so I just think that there's been a lot of restrictions. | ||
what do you mean change your gender? | ||
Well, so for instance, if you want to change your gender identity where somebody says, So you do recognize you can't change your biological gender. | ||
Okay. | ||
Your biological sex? | ||
Yeah, you can't change your biological sex. | ||
No trans person would dispute that. | ||
But the point is, is that like for what we're seeing is we're seeing this restrictions of gender affirming care. | ||
Now, listen, I. They have the ability to do whatever they want with their body. | ||
At 18, right, when they're of age. | ||
Okay, so are you against any surgeries until 18 then? | ||
Right now, you have to be 18 to get those surgeries, yes. | ||
No, they're definitely castrating minors. | ||
Oh my God. | ||
That's definitely happening. | ||
unidentified
|
They're not. | |
But I think, again, we want to... | ||
We really want to... | ||
You do know you're wrong on this, right? | ||
I think we're going to have to agree to disagree on that. | ||
So just to have it on record, you're a good sport. | ||
Just have it on record. | ||
You don't think any minors have had any trans surgery, chemicals, anything? | ||
As far as I know, the laws around surgery are around, I believe it's 18. Now, I could be wrong, and I would love examples if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, the laws currently are... | ||
It's kind of gruesome, but I'd rather not. | ||
Well, I don't know. | ||
You know, I can't speak to specific cases. | ||
But what I would say is we really want to center personal autonomy. | ||
And I believe in individual liberties and civil liberties and the right to bodily autonomy. | ||
I believe in the right to bodily autonomy no matter what that looks like. | ||
If you want to tattoo your whole body, if you want to do whatever you want to do to your own body, you should have the right. | ||
Well, I asked you to define trans rights. | ||
It sounds to me you're just talking about general human rights, which I'm fine with. | ||
So then I guess where the rubber meets the road is. | ||
So when the rubber meets the road is no, there should be no trans anything until 18. You think that's a fair age? | ||
I'd say 21, but 18, you think? | ||
No. | ||
I said, as far as I know, the laws currently, you do have to wait until you're 18 to get physical surgery. | ||
That doesn't mean that you can't get certain psychological care, gender-affirming, you know, hormone therapy, things like that. | ||
I will tell you, I know a lot of girls. | ||
Cisgender girls that are put on hormone therapy when they're younger to prevent themselves from getting their period too early, which is a big problem now with young girls. | ||
So I think that it's really ultimately these decisions are not the federal government or state government's decisions to make. | ||
These are decisions that should be between a health care provider and parent. | ||
You're back to being small government. | ||
Okay. | ||
I don't know where you got this idea that I'm for huge government. | ||
Well, are you not on the left? | ||
I mean, the left is all about big government. | ||
I think, you know, one thing that's been very frustrating to me is that I'm constantly, people, especially on the right, project a lot of opinions that I have never espoused onto me. | ||
And I have always been pretty consistent with my opinions, especially when it comes to civil liberties and personal. | ||
Well, you know, you're going to have a hard time. | ||
If I search Taylor, Lorenzo, and Troyer, I doubt I'll find any cases of you standing up for my free speech. | ||
Am I wrong? | ||
I'll be honest. | ||
I didn't know enough about you. | ||
So then you're not that informed. | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
You're just not. | ||
Because I didn't personally defend you. | ||
I'm not a free speech defender. | ||
Did you defend Douglas Mackey? | ||
I just don't think I have. | ||
These are the biggest free speech cases in the federal court. | ||
I went to prison for free. | ||
Taylor, Taylor, take my name out of it. | ||
It can be Johnny Bag of Donuts. | ||
Do you think somebody should go to jail for speech? | ||
Broadly, I will say I broadly don't believe that speech should be criminalized. | ||
Now, again, obviously we live in a society where there is some rule of law. | ||
And if somebody comes to my house and is saying, You know, like, I just know I've dealt with a stalker, for instance. | ||
I know that there's a certain line that he could cross where it becomes criminal. | ||
So I don't know. | ||
You know, there are obviously restrictions. | ||
But I believe in protecting civil liberties, and especially when it comes to speech online, I think we're seeing a record assault. | ||
Did you stand up for Alex Jones' free speech? | ||
I don't think I did. | ||
I don't think I talked about it. | ||
So that's all I'm saying. | ||
So to me, that's just a little ironic. | ||
And that's fine. | ||
We can all expand our consciousness on this issue. | ||
I tend to focus more on the laws rather than the people. | ||
And I think you're more focused on people, like when you're saying, give me a specific teenager. | ||
Well, yeah, I mean, laws exist to harm people or help people. | ||
Of course, of course. | ||
But I'm saying I tend to focus honestly on not high profile, like examples of things, more of how these laws train. | ||
I just am saying I generally focus on the legislation as a whole rather than specific examples. | ||
But I'm sympathetic to that fact. | ||
And I would have a conversation with anybody. | ||
And I trust me. | ||
And you are. | ||
And here you are. | ||
So that's fair. | ||
I will say again, I have had my own content censored online. | ||
So I have had my own content taken down. | ||
I have been banned from Twitter personally by Elon. | ||
I know how frustrating and infuriating it is. | ||
I came out from the jump. | ||
Do you have any friends at Meta or YouTube? | ||
No. | ||
I was hoping you could put in a word, maybe get me back on there. | ||
I've been banned for almost 10 years from there. | ||
No reason given. | ||
Well, exactly. | ||
So one thing I will say about these platforms, and by the way, it is protected speech, like content moderation itself is protected speech, which I think adds to a complexity around here. | ||
But there is not transparency. | ||
And that is a huge problem. | ||
And I think we desperately need these platforms to bring transparency to their moderation processes. | ||
We need to understand the appeal processes. | ||
We need to understand actual, you know, where and when did somebody violate terms? | ||
Because I totally agree that a lot of it is way too subjective. | ||
And all you have to do is look at the pro-Palestinian protests. | ||
Yeah, I do think that's kind of the big demarcation line right now. | ||
I do think a lot of conservatives get that one wrong. | ||
All right, I want to ask you a question from something from your latest video. | ||
You talked about threats to a functional democracy. | ||
Who do you think is a bigger threat to functional democracy, Democrats or Republicans? | ||
Oh God, well, like I've said, it's so hard because it's like, I think both are a threat, I think both. | ||
I think that the threats to democracy that we're facing are broad based and across our entire political system, What I see, I see Democrats and Republicans standing together. | ||
To dismantle free speech on the internet. | ||
And that concerns me. | ||
So, you know, I think on some cases- You're pivoting. | ||
Well, no, no, no. | ||
I think both. | ||
I mean, there are Democrat lawmakers that I think do a really good job. | ||
Ron Wyden, others. | ||
I think there are Republican lawmakers that do a good job. | ||
I mean, I agree with Rand Paul on a lot of stuff. | ||
I'm talking about specifically a threat to our functional democracy. | ||
Well, exactly. | ||
That's what I'm saying. | ||
I'm saying when you look at who votes for these laws and what that what that video is about is about. | ||
OK, well, let me just pause right there then real quick. | ||
Who voted for Kamala Harris to win the primary? | ||
Oh, that was the most corrupt thing. | ||
Trust me, you're not going to. | ||
That's all I wanted to hear. | ||
That's all. | ||
That's all I wanted to hear. | ||
The Democrats steal elections. | ||
They don't even believe in democracy. | ||
Come on, Taylor. | ||
I'm fishing here. | ||
Give me something. | ||
I don't think anybody thinks that I'm a Democrat defender. | ||
I thought that that entire, and I actually, I just yesterday finished Alex Thompson and Jake Tapper's new book. | ||
Oh, yeah. | ||
It's, I mean, it's incredibly disturbing. | ||
Hold on, though, Taylor. | ||
I'm out of time here. | ||
But you realize that that's all part of a, that's all a sham. | ||
They were part of the cover-up. | ||
They covered up Biden's cancer. | ||
They were part of the cover-up. | ||
They're not the truth-tellers now. | ||
Listen, I agree that journalists should be a lot more. | ||
I hate how journalists save shit for their books. | ||
I totally hate that. | ||
But the point is, is that the Democrats- That's not what it is. | ||
That's not what this is. | ||
They're liars. | ||
Taylor, you have more honesty and integrity than 1,000 Jake Tappers. | ||
10,000 Jake Tappers. | ||
Don't believe a word that fraud says. | ||
Well, Jake Tapper is a big Israel supporter, so I would tend to agree on that. | ||
But yeah, I mean, I think that the Democrats have shown that they- Yeah, they don't support. | ||
They want to control. | ||
This is why they want to control online speech just as much as the Republicans. | ||
No, way more. | ||
Way, way more. | ||
See, that's the only point. | ||
I agree with almost everything except you think that it's equally from the left and the right. | ||
That's where I find you entirely just wrong. | ||
But hey, great interview. | ||
Appreciate your time. | ||
I'm out of time, Taylor. | ||
I'm out of time. | ||
We'll do it again some other time. | ||
Appreciate your time. | ||
I am proud to announce Ultimate Life Force. | ||
Now, ladies and gentlemen, in the last four plus years, there's been a lot of great formulas out there put out by a lot of doctors and health experts that have known healthy natural compounds in them that help clean out your blood and help get rid of the spike protein. | ||
Because even if you haven't ever taken one of the experimental COVID shots that orders your body from Pfizer and Moderna with the mRNA, To mass-produce the HIV-spiked protein, that's literally what it does. | ||
It's crazy to even say that. | ||
Still, years later, I can't believe it. | ||
It's so crazy. | ||
It's just publicly what they did. | ||
That they welded onto the virus that they artificially created in Chappahoe, North Carolina, and then shipped out to Wuhan so they could release it and claim the Chinese did it. | ||
Peter Daszak, Fauci, and the rest of them, it's all come out, that whether you got the wild virus or whether you took the poison shot, And in some people, when they do the regimen of the anti-spike protein compounds that are out there, it goes away and they get tested later and never comes back. | ||
Some people, it does come back over time. | ||
And I can't tell you how many friends and family and people I know that have what they call long COVID. | ||
Either from natural COVID, of course it wasn't natural, but I mean catching the man-made virus out in the wild, or getting the accelerated version of it and your body actually replicating the spike protein from the poison shots, from the mRNA gene therapy injections. | ||
So do your own research. | ||
I'm not a scientist. | ||
I'm not a doctor. | ||
I just have talked to a lot of them and interviewed them and read countless studies on air. | ||
We've covered it. | ||
You notice we didn't come out with a spike detox in the last four plus years because there were a lot of other good brands out there. | ||
But talking to researchers in the last year and things, they were saying, well, this formula is good over here, but it doesn't have this, so you should take this formula over there. | ||
And so when I was buying about a year ago, all the time, which was two and a few months ago for my lawyer as well, the different formulas online to go give it to them, I said, wait a minute. | ||
Why don't we just combine all the known best formulas? | ||
And I checked with the scientists, the nutritionists, you know, they say it's fine to combine all these. | ||
And then put it out in one pill so you get all the benefits from all the different angles. | ||
And that's exactly what we've done with Ultimate Life Force. | ||
So everybody should be on it. | ||
And it's not just for cleaning out the blood. | ||
All the things that are in this are known to just do incredible things for your overall health. | ||
The antioxidants, all the things it does are just so synergistically good together. | ||
And let me just tell you about the 400 milligrams per capsule, that's a big dose, of NAC. | ||
Now, it's the precursor of glutathione, your body's main and most powerful antioxidant. | ||
But if you take just raw glutathione for a reason, it doesn't absorb very well. | ||
But if you get it as NAC, that's the precursor, it breaks down and it's much more absorbable, according to the research. | ||
It's involved in nearly every core process of cellular cleanup in your body. | ||
This is the key compound to take if you care about your health. | ||
They even tried to ban NAC during COVID because it was so effective. | ||
Selenium is also key for liver and lung health, and all experts have been saying this for decades, not to mention all the key compounds contained in this blend designed to make your body's cleanup engines even more powerful. | ||
It's all supercharged. | ||
It's all there. | ||
Get yours today. | ||
And that's just a few of the ingredients. | ||
Everything known to clean out your cardiovascular system, to boost your vascular health. | ||
For the brain, for the lungs, for the heart, for your arteries, your capillaries, this is it. |