Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Wednesday, May 21st, 2025. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room. | ||
| The fastest three hours on the internet. | ||
| And we are loaded today. | ||
| No shortage of news, no shortage of video clips. | ||
| President Trump providing fireworks from the White House today. | ||
| And really what he's now done on two occasions, but he does this, well, two occasions that have had a similar impact, but he's done this on multiple occasions, where he brings in the foreign diplomats. | ||
| And sometimes it's good, but sometimes it's bad. | ||
| But it's a genius political diplomatic maneuver from President Trump, and that's to get these foreign diplomats into the Oval Office, sit them down for some conversations, maybe some negotiations, bring in the media, and then have it out right there. | ||
| And then have it out right there. | ||
| And he does this... | ||
| With just about every foreign leader that comes in, and sometimes it goes well, and both of them have a good conversation. | ||
| And then sometimes, maybe not so well for the person sitting next to President Trump, like Zelensky, or today the President of South Africa. | ||
| And so Trump starts to have the conversation and the negotiations right there for the world to see, with the media, so everybody can see it, everybody can hear it. | ||
| And then... | ||
| Just like Zelensky. | ||
| The president of South Africa says, oh, I don't want to talk about this now. | ||
| Let's talk in private. | ||
| Let's talk in secrecy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ooh, gotcha. | |
| Genius move. | ||
| Trump did it again today. | ||
| We're going to have all the sights and sounds from that. | ||
| Elon Musk was in there as well. | ||
| It was really an amazing moment. | ||
| Nobody could do anything like it except President Trump. | ||
| Now, we do have some updates from the Hill dealing with the big, beautiful bill and the tax bill and the rules vote that failed last night. | ||
| There's a lot of misinformation out there. | ||
| We had it right yesterday. | ||
| Now it's all over the news. | ||
| So tomorrow's news today on that issue, but we're going to tell you what's really going on behind the scenes. | ||
| Again, today everybody is missing it. | ||
| I guess now it's a little more opinionated. | ||
| Whether you think that true fiscal conservatives should be acting as obstacles to this bill, or whether you think the Freedom Caucus is to blame for any stalling, or how much responsibility Mike Johnson needs to bear for a major failure that happened this morning. | ||
| So I'm going to tell you all about that. | ||
| We do have a big stack of geopolitical news today as well. | ||
| Some other odds and ends in the political news today, but we are absolutely loaded. | ||
| I think, though, going back to... | ||
| Oh, oh, we also are going to hear from RFK Jr., who had a congressional hearing. | ||
| You know, when you look at what RFK Jr. is doing, forget about the politics. | ||
| You may agree with some of his politics, maybe disagree. | ||
| The story is that, and he... | ||
| I was asked it in one line of questioning from Senator Kennedy, and he responded, but it's, why did we, the American people, have all of these toxic ingredients in our diet to begin with? | ||
| Why are we having to go through the motions now and go through this process now of removing these toxic ingredients that we know are doing harm? | ||
| What are we doing at this point? | ||
| How did we get here? | ||
| And so that's kind of the story. | ||
| And the theme is, it's the same theme of, you know, why are our cities so dangerous and riddled with deranged homeless people and drug addicts? | ||
| Why is our food so riddled with poison and toxins? | ||
| And why was there a neurotoxin fluoride in our water? | ||
| We don't have to live like this. | ||
| We don't have to live with, you can't even go out to eat without getting a toxic food, even if it's a healthy food item. | ||
| Well, President Trump and his team came prepared today as the South African president was visiting the White House and he had a delegation with him and they were clearly not ready for what they were about to endure. | ||
| Now you think about the situation leading up to this with the South African farmers and the 60 that, the white farmers from South Africa specifically, 60 of them just arriving in the U.S. with the refugee status and how that had the Democrats all bent out of shape. | ||
| And of course, they go through the process of filing to be refugees. | ||
| They can prove the status that they are in direct threat of actions from their government. | ||
| So the Trump administration comes prepared for this meeting today with the videos of South African political leaders leading events, leading chants, song and dance about killing white farmers and stealing their land and how in South Africa it's a major political movement to do just that. | ||
| Now, you can have debates about some of the idiosyncrasies of this, like, well, it's really more of a class thing than a race thing, and the blacks don't have any farmland, and they're sick of the whites. | ||
| So it doesn't really matter, really, other than for the sake of discussion. | ||
| These white farmers' lives are in danger. | ||
| They proved it. | ||
| They filed for the status legally, and then they got accepted. | ||
| That's 60 people. | ||
| Now, to get off track for a second, and then we're going to go to the Oval Office and watch Trump's political genius today with his team fully prepared for this. | ||
| Think about how crazy it is. | ||
| We just had a hearing yesterday with Marco Rubio. | ||
| And the Democrats were using their time to attack Marco Rubio for... | ||
| Helping facilitate the acceptance of 60 white farmers from South Africa. | ||
| So somehow 60 white farmers from South Africa is some huge deal. | ||
| It's some big issue for the Democrats, and they're up in arms, and they're going crazy. | ||
| Is it really about race? | ||
| Maybe. | ||
| Maybe to some Democrats. | ||
| Maybe at a certain level, the Democrat Party just... | ||
| Generally speaking, is racist against white people. | ||
| But whether you believe it has to do with the skin color of these farmers or not, how insane is it that the same party that just brought in 20 million people, the whole thing illegal, | ||
| every action rubber-stamped, wide-open borders, Going through the process, filing the paperwork, proving why you need asylum or refugee status, all of that be damned. | ||
| Throw it all out the window. | ||
| We're not even going to do DNA testing to see if these are actually your kids. | ||
| We're going to cancel that. | ||
| Enabling child trafficking. | ||
| And by the way, they show up waving foreign country flags. | ||
| They show up... | ||
| To immediately become a benefactor of the welfare state. | ||
| And this is all good. | ||
| That's all good. | ||
| And if you have a problem with that, somehow that's on you. | ||
| But now 60 white African, South African farmers show up. | ||
| They're not here to get on welfare. | ||
| They did go through the process to legally file as a refugee for asylum. | ||
| They can prove that they are in direct threat of government actions against their lives, and there are only 60 of them, and they're immediately going to contribute to our society while they show up waving American flags. | ||
| And those 60 people the Democrats have a problem with, not the other 20 million that are coming here to suck off the system, waving a foreign country's flag, and don't go through any of the legal process. | ||
| But, okay, now we're just talking about... | ||
| How corrupt and crazy Democrats are. | ||
| But this leads us to the situation today at the White House. | ||
| Now, I don't know if it was Trump's idea to have this whole thing laid out and ready to go. | ||
| Maybe there were other members of the administration that were helping in that process. | ||
| Maybe Elon Musk had something to do with it. | ||
| But they came prepared. | ||
| And they said, we're going to call out This blatant racism happening in South Africa. | ||
| We're going to call out the targeting of white farmers. | ||
| And we're going to bring the receipts and present the evidence for when they try to act like it's not true. | ||
| And so that's exactly what happened. | ||
| It was an absolute masterclass. | ||
| This is one of President Trump's strongest political maneuvers to bring in the foreign leaders and then do public discussions. | ||
| It was brilliant today. | ||
| Here's the longer exchange, and then we'll have some of the shorter exchanges as well, including an NBC News reporter just getting excoriated by Trump. | ||
| It's always fun to watch that. | ||
| But here it is. | ||
| South African President Cyril Ramaphosa tries to deny white farmers are being attacked. | ||
| The Trump team has the evidence and the big screen TV ready to show the evidence. | ||
| Boy, oh boy, I think somebody needed to towel him off he was sweating so much when this video was aired. | ||
| Here's the long exchange with the evidence. | ||
| Oh, and don't worry, there's even more evidence. | ||
| So this isn't even all of it. | ||
| He had more. | ||
| But here's the longer exchange with the videos, clip six. | ||
| We have thousands of stories talking about it. | ||
| We have documentaries. | ||
| We have news stories. | ||
| Is Natalie here? | ||
| Somebody here to turn that? | ||
| I could show you a couple of things. | ||
| It has to be responded to. | ||
| Let me see the articles, please, if you would. | ||
| And, excuse me, turn the lights down. | ||
| Turn the lights down. | ||
| And just put this on. | ||
| It's right behind you. | ||
| South African President Ramaphosa is starting to cringe here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
People are going to occupy land. | |
| We have no permission from you, from the president, from no one. | ||
| We don't care. | ||
| We can do whatever you want to do. | ||
| Who are you to tell us whether we can occupy land or not? | ||
| Who are going to occupy land? | ||
| South Africa, occupy land. | ||
| That's who I am! | ||
| Yes, sir. | ||
| It has never been scared to kill. | ||
| A revolution demand at some point that must be killing because the killing is part of an revolution attack. | ||
| So to kill NASA! | ||
| Kill the poor, the former! | ||
| Good to go on the farm, broodile pie, pie, broodile pie. | ||
| So this is just video from official political events in South Africa where they dance and sing and chant with tens of thousands of people, maybe more, to kill the white farmers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The man of DJ is a white man. | |
| So these people really want to eat their hearts. | ||
| Go out on a white man. | ||
| They feel a terrible pain because they're touched a white man. | ||
| Not because by Shabbat and Suleen will not be touched. | ||
| There will be touched. | ||
| No one. | ||
| But you are starting with this white mess. | ||
| You are cutting the throat of one day. | ||
| You got that. | ||
| So you kill the monster. | ||
| Kill the blue. | ||
| The bottom. | ||
| Kill the blue. | ||
| The bottom. | ||
| The blue. | ||
| Imagine, as the South African delegation is being forced To watch this, for the world to see, it's totally embarrassing. | ||
| Call it racism, call it genocide, whatever it is, it's evil, it's wrong. | ||
| But they can't deny it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's undeniable. | |
| You can see now President Ramaphosa clearly embarrassed. | ||
| And it should be. | ||
| It's totally embarrassing. | ||
| Completely embarrassing. | ||
| This is a mainstream political movement in your country. | ||
| You tried to deny it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For expropriate them without compensation, whether they like it or not, if they object, they can seek a refugee in America. | |
| Now this is very bad. | ||
| These are burial sites right here. | ||
| Burial sites. | ||
| Over a thousand of white farmers. | ||
| And those cars are lined up to pay love on a Sunday morning. | ||
| Each one of those white things you see is a cross. | ||
| And there's approximately a thousand of them. | ||
| They're all white farmers, the family of white farmers. | ||
| And those cars aren't driving. | ||
| They're stopped there to pay respects to their family member who was killed. | ||
| And it's a terrible sight. | ||
| I've never seen anything like it. | ||
| And now the South African delegation pretending like they've never seen it before. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
| You had no idea. | ||
| And by the way, this isn't just to put the South African leadership and delegation on the spot. | ||
| This is also on the American media. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Have they told you where that is, Mr. President? | |
| Oh, I had no idea. | ||
| This I've never seen. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| He had no idea. | ||
| He had no idea. | ||
| Nobody knew Biden was sick either. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yep. | |
| Totally. | ||
| Totally believable. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Mr. President, the Pentagon announced it will be accepting a Qatari jet. | ||
| So first they try to deny it. | ||
| Then Trump is like, well, you know what? | ||
| Let's have a little... | ||
| Want to do a little movie time? | ||
| Let's have a little Oval Office movie time, huh? | ||
| Kill the lights. | ||
| Go ahead and play the video. | ||
| Oh. | ||
| Yeah, here's some footage from South Africa and they're chanting to kill the whites. | ||
| And then here's the mass graves of all the white farmers. | ||
| And then President Ramaphosa says, oh, I had no idea. | ||
| Never heard of this. | ||
| So that's putting their leadership on blast for allowing this to happen or even being a part of it. | ||
| And then it's putting the American media on the spot, forcing them to cover it where they would otherwise choose to ignore it or have chosen to ignore it. | ||
| It gets better. | ||
| He didn't just have the videos. | ||
| He brought the documents as well. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clip 7. I don't know. | |
| These are articles over the last few days. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Death of people. | |
| Death. | ||
| Horrible death. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Death. | |
| I don't know. | ||
| White South Africans. | ||
| Are fleeing because of the violence and racist laws. | ||
| And this is all... | ||
| I mean, I'll give these to you. | ||
| So when you say, what would I like to do? | ||
| I don't know what to do. | ||
| Just look at this. | ||
| White South African couples say... | ||
| That they were attacked violently. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I could do that. | |
| Look, here's burial sites all over the place. | ||
| These are all white farmers that are being buried. | ||
| And he asks about a jet that was given. | ||
| You ought to be ashamed of yourself. | ||
| You know, you are so bad. | ||
| You're such a bad reporter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, two questions. | |
| Mr. President, two questions. | ||
| Can I have a seat, please, President Trump? | ||
| This family was wiped out. | ||
| I'm just looking. | ||
| And you got the South African fake news in there yelling too. | ||
| No, it's not happening, no! | ||
| Well, I think the videos are so... | ||
| No, no, when you look at the videos, I mean, how does it get worse? | ||
| And these are people that are officials and they're saying that kill the white farmer and take their land. | ||
| You know, there's so many different angles to this. | ||
| We talk about the master class of this strategy from President Trump to just do all of this publicly and then force the media to cover it. | ||
| But, you know, The juxtaposition of living in America and hearing the media here, the corporate media, the left-wing media, all the propaganda, say how racist America is and racist against that group or this group, and it's all total garbage. | ||
| When we probably live in the least racist country in the world, and I'm not going to sit here and Try to zoom in on certain angles of, well, what about affirmative action and diversity and, you know, this history? | ||
| Let's just hold on. | ||
| America is the most diverse country in the world. | ||
| And your average daily experience as an American, no matter what color your skin is, you're going to go out and you're going to be around all types of people and everybody's going to be fine. | ||
| That is the average experience in America. | ||
| And pick whatever you want. | ||
| That's how it's going to be. | ||
| I mean, I just think about Austin, an extremely diverse city. | ||
| It's got to be one of the more diverse cities in America. | ||
| I think Houston was one of the more diverse, but things are changing rapidly. | ||
| Austin is so diverse. | ||
| A lot of Hispanics, obviously a lot of whites, a lot of black people, a lot of Muslims here. | ||
| Maybe Asians are like the smallest group, but there's Asians here too. | ||
| And it kind of, it almost gives me a sense of pride, only as like a big middle finger to the American left that claims we're all racist, claims this country is racist, pretends like different racial groups don't get along. | ||
| And it's just total BS. | ||
| Any social club you get into in America is probably going to be extremely diverse. | ||
| You know, the one social club that they tried to demonize, the Proud Boys, was, the leader was a black man. | ||
| Again, an extremely diverse group. | ||
| I mean, I just think about it. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. | ||
| It gives me a sense of pride. | ||
| Not as much because I don't, because it's not that I care. | ||
| It's just like F you to the corporate media that wants us all to be racist or claims we're racist. | ||
| I played basketball for like three hours last night. | ||
| And I mean, you couldn't name a race that wasn't playing last night. | ||
| I mean, Arabs, blacks, whites, Hispanics, young, old. | ||
| I mean, and nobody gives a damn. | ||
| And everybody has a good time. | ||
| And it's like, yeah, oh yeah, we're so racist here, yeah. | ||
| Give me a break. | ||
| So they say, oh, America's so racist. | ||
| And then most Americans get along just fine. | ||
| And then you have South Africa where they have political movements kill white farmers and they say, it's not even going on. | ||
| You're the racist. | ||
| You, the American, are the racist. | ||
| The most diverse country in the world. | ||
| The least racist country in the world. | ||
| We're so... | ||
| We're so anti-racist that saying someone's a racist is like, oh, it's one of the worst insults you can be. | ||
| Oh no, oh, I'm not a racist. | ||
| Look, I got this friend over here. | ||
| And then we get lectured about how we're racist while they're killing whites in South Africa and you're not even supposed to talk about it. | ||
| And they try to deny it's going on. | ||
| So Trump has to have this huge Oval Office meeting and say, okay, you want to say it's not happening? | ||
| Here you go. | ||
| Here's all the evidence. | ||
| Let's let the world see. | ||
| And let's put this South African leadership here with us today. | ||
| Let's go ahead and just put them publicly on blast as well for allowing this to happen and being a part of it. | ||
| And then the NBC News reporter. | ||
| This one is just, you know, it's always fun. | ||
| Maybe he deserved it. | ||
| Maybe he didn't. | ||
| NBC News reporter just gets torn apart by Trump. | ||
| Clip 8. Any questions, please? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, you welcome white Afrikaner refugees here. | |
| Can you explain to Americans why it's appropriate to welcome white Afrikaners here when other refugees, like Afghans, Venezuelans, Haitians, have all had their protective status revoked? | ||
| Well, this is a group, NBC, that is truly fake news. | ||
| They ask a lot of questions in a very pointed way. | ||
| They're not questions, their statements. | ||
| We've had... | ||
| Tremendous complaints about Africa, about other countries too, from people. | ||
| They say there's a lot of bad things going on in Africa, and that's what we're going to be discussing today. | ||
| When you say we don't take others, all you have to do is take a look at the southern border. | ||
| We let 21 million people come through our border, totally unchecked, totally unvetted. | ||
| They came from all over the world. | ||
| In many cases, they're criminals. | ||
| They come from prisons. | ||
| They come from mental institutions. | ||
| They come from street gangs. | ||
| They're drug dealers. | ||
| So don't say that we didn't take them. | ||
| We take them. | ||
| We're trying to get them out as fast as we can. | ||
| And we're doing record business on that. | ||
| And we just want a big case where we're allowed to send back hundreds of criminals to Venezuela. | ||
| Just won that today in the Supreme Court. | ||
| I'm happy to hear. | ||
| But we do have a lot of people who are very concerned with regard to South Africa. | ||
| And that's really the purpose of the meeting. | ||
| And we'll see how that turns out. | ||
| But we have many people that feel they're being persecuted and they're coming to the United States. | ||
| So we take from many, many locations if we feel there's persecution or genocide going on. | ||
| And we had a lot of people. | ||
| I must tell you, Mr. President, we have had a tremendous number of people, especially since they've seen this. | ||
| Generally, they're white farmers and they're fleeing South Africa. | ||
| And it's a very sad thing to see. | ||
| But I hope we can have an explanation of that, because I know you don't want that. | ||
| And it's kind of a different meeting. | ||
| Normally we have meetings, we talk about trade, and we'll be talking about trade and other things. | ||
| But that certainly will be a subject that comes up. | ||
| There was another video. | ||
| For the sake of time, we won't get to it. | ||
| We're up against a break now. | ||
| But there's another video where he basically just lambasted the reporter for asking about the... | ||
| Airplane gift. | ||
| And then kicks him out of the Oval Office and I think may have actually revoked his press pass. | ||
| So, yeah, he didn't... | ||
| I think he's sick of hearing about the jet, for one. | ||
| And you can see in this clip as we go to break, clip 9, if you just put it on the screen. | ||
| Folks, they were not... | ||
| They were not ready to be faced with this. | ||
| They didn't want to watch it. | ||
| They didn't want to see it. | ||
| It's obviously embarrassing for them. | ||
| It's embarrassing for their country. | ||
| And they couldn't deny it because the evidence was put on display for the world to see right there with them in the White House. | ||
| So what are you going to do? | ||
| Are you going to deny it? | ||
| Which is something I don't understand. | ||
| If you hate white farmers for whatever reason, then just own it. | ||
| That's what I understand. | ||
| People accuse you of all these things. | ||
| It's like, if I was any of these things, then I would own it. | ||
| By the way, we got Elon Musk talking about the South Africa situation. | ||
| And then CNN responding to it all. | ||
| We're going to play the clip of Trump hammering the NBC News reporter trying to distract from the topic of discussion. | ||
| But here's CNN. | ||
| Let's see how CNN is handling all of this in clip 12. Explaining that this is not true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What the videos show is Julius Malema, the far-left opposition leader of South Africa. | |
| His part is called the Economic Freedom Fighters. | ||
| And it also showed former president Jacob Zuma. | ||
| What Julius Malema was singing, Kill the Boar, Kill the Farmer, was an anti-apartheid song. | ||
| From the struggle against white minority rule in South Africa, they've explained that this is not a literal call to attack and kill the farmer because of the historical nature of that. | ||
| But it's been weaponized by groups in South Africa and increasingly by the Margaret in the United States to essentially misrepresent what is going on in the country, Boris, Brianna. | ||
| Also of note, Larry, can you... | ||
| Wow. | ||
| It's being twisted. | ||
| It's being spun. | ||
| It's being used. | ||
| It's being weaponized. | ||
| Yeah, right. | ||
| Right. | ||
| Them chanting, kill the white farmer, and then killing the white farmer is being used as a political talking point. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| So I guess the appropriate response then is to just say, go ahead. | ||
| The appropriate response is to just ignore it. | ||
| The appropriate response is, what exactly? | ||
| Because I don't want to weaponize the fact that they're dancing around saying kill the white farmer as they're killing the white farmers. | ||
| I mean, we wouldn't want to politicize or weaponize that. | ||
| What is the correct response then, CNN? | ||
| I guess the response is to ignore it. | ||
| Until it's time to support it, maybe. | ||
| And maybe that's really what they do. | ||
| Oh, it's the far left. | ||
| Well, of course it's the far left. | ||
| It's always been the far left. | ||
| Now, here's the NBC News reporter. | ||
| I don't know if he'll ever be back in the White House after this one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. President, the Pentagon announced it would be accepted. | |
| What are you talking about? | ||
| What does this have to do with the Qatari jet? | ||
| They're giving the United States Air Force a jet, okay? | ||
| And it's a great thing. | ||
| We're talking about a lot of other things. | ||
| It's NBC trying to get off the subject of what you just saw. | ||
| You're a terrible reporter. | ||
| Number one, you don't have what it takes to be a reporter. | ||
| You're not smart enough. | ||
| But for you to go on to a subject about a jet that was given to the United States Air Force, which is a very nice thing, they also gave $5.1 trillion worth of investment You ought to go back to your studio at NBC, because Brian Roberts and the people that run that place... | ||
| They ought to be investigated. | ||
| They are so terrible, the way you run that network. | ||
| And you're a disgrace. | ||
| No more questions from you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
| Nice. | ||
| Well done. | ||
| Now, Elon Musk knows about South Africa. | ||
| After all, he's from there. | ||
| He has also had issues with doing business there because he's white. | ||
| He breaks it down. | ||
| He explains in a recent interview here in Clip 10. Not otherwise. | ||
| And so now I'm in this absurd situation where I was born in South Africa but can't get a license to operate in Starlink because I'm not black. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, it looks like that's about to change. | |
| I just asked you a question. | ||
| Please answer. | ||
| Does that seem right to you? | ||
| Well, those rules were designed to bring about an era of more economic equality in South Africa. | ||
| And it looks like the government has found a way around those rules for you. | ||
| I'll ask you a question. | ||
| This is your interview. | ||
| Everyone wants to hear from you. | ||
| Can I ask you a question? | ||
| Yes or no? | ||
| Racist laws, yes or no? | ||
| Not for me to answer. | ||
| I have got a question for you about your government work and the amount of savings. | ||
| Why do you like racist laws? | ||
| This is not for me to answer. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| Yes, it is. | ||
| Now, you wouldn't be trying to dodge a question that is difficult for you to answer. | ||
| You have to ask a question. | ||
| That's my question. | ||
| No, you answer. | ||
| You know, it really is amazing. | ||
| It really is amazing. | ||
| Whenever the left, whether it's politicians or even just leftist media members, whenever they're given the opportunity to disavow or stand against something that's obviously wrong, obviously bad, they can never do it. | ||
| Why is that? | ||
| It's the same issue you see with Democrats. | ||
| Why can't Democrats disavow blatant racism? | ||
| Why can't Democrats disavow... | ||
| Violent activity and political terrorism. | ||
| Why can't they do it? | ||
| Because it's part of their political infrastructure. | ||
| They like it. | ||
| They're part of it. | ||
| They want it. | ||
| They need it. | ||
| They can't disavow it. | ||
| It's part of their body politic. | ||
| But think about how pathetic this female journalist. | ||
| It's very simple. | ||
| He says, do you think it's a good thing? | ||
| That in South Africa, you're denied a business deal because you're white. | ||
| And she says, I can't answer that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
| She's white, by the way. | ||
| That's tough. | ||
| Now, if Musk would have said, do you think it's good in America that you can't get a business deal if you're black? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you think she would have a hard time answering that? | |
| I wonder. | ||
| Or I wonder if she would answer that real lickety split. | ||
| Just hop right to the answer on that. | ||
| But, oh, I'm not here to comment about discrimination or racism against whites. | ||
| That's not for me to discuss. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| He then went on to accuse her of being an NPC. | ||
| I think it's fair to say this interview didn't go too well for her. | ||
| Clip 11. You've talked about $4 billion a day being saved. | ||
| But that... | ||
| That won't get. | ||
| And I think everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in government is a very good thing. | ||
| But if you add that up, it's not going to get to 2 trillion over the lifetime of Doge. | ||
| I'm sorry? | ||
| The 4 billion a day, if Doge is going to run until next July, it's not going to get you to 2 trillion dollars. | ||
| But you still say it's your aim, so we'll take that as read. | ||
| There's what Doge... | ||
| I feel you're somewhat trapped in the NPC dialogue tree of a traditional journalist. | ||
| So it's difficult when I'm conversing with someone who's trapped in the dialogue tree of a conventional journalist, because it's like talking to a computer. | ||
| So Doge is an advisory group. | ||
| We are doing the best we can as an advisory group. | ||
| The progress made thus far as an advisory group is excellent. | ||
| I don't think any advisory group has done better in the history of advisory groups of the government. | ||
| Now, we do not make the laws, nor do we control the judiciary, nor do we control the executive branch. | ||
| We are simply advisors. | ||
| In that context, we are doing very well. | ||
| Beyond that, we cannot We can't take action beyond that because we are not some sort of imperial dictator of the government. | ||
| There are three branches of government that are to some degree opposed to that level of cost savings. | ||
| Nonetheless, let's not criticize whether there's $4 trillion and instead look at the fact that $160 billion has been saved and more will be saved too. | ||
| Now, I would agree. | ||
| That, as far as I know, it's the best advisory group I've ever seen inside of government, and that's Doge. | ||
| And I think that, you know, Musk, he's not a political person. | ||
| And dealing with D.C. politics and American politics, there's, you know, I don't want to say rules. | ||
| I think rules is not really the right word, not even necessarily decorum, but... | ||
| There's strategy, I would say. | ||
| There's strategy when it comes to communication. | ||
| There's strategy when it comes to execution, results, all of it. | ||
| And I think Musk is kind of starting to learn that. | ||
| He could have easily gone on there and just said, well, sure, we could save $2 trillion tomorrow if American politicians weren't such corrupt scumbags. | ||
| Maybe that's what he'd like to say. | ||
| Maybe he'll say that in the future. | ||
| But he's saying, you know what, let's just, we'll be soft right now. | ||
| We still have hopes we can do this stuff. | ||
| And so she's here saying, well, you're not going to reach your goal of $2 trillion. | ||
| And by the way, because I get this incoming all the time, Musk is now in the headlines every day. | ||
| Most of what you see about Elon Musk is fake news. | ||
| The Atlantic just came out with some story. | ||
| Musk is getting crushed financially. | ||
| Musk's... | ||
| Standard as the world's richest man in danger. | ||
| Not only is Musk now by far the richest man in the world still, he's actually almost double what number two is. | ||
| And the Atlantic just publishes these stories. | ||
| It's all garbage. | ||
| Same stuff they do when they say, oh, falling out between Trump and Musk, falling out between Trump administration and Musk. | ||
| No, there's definitely some contentious debate between Musk and the Trump administration. | ||
| There was no falling out. | ||
| Oh, Musk is getting kicked out. | ||
| Musk is getting forcefully removed. | ||
| Nobody wants him there anymore. | ||
| Musk is tired of it. | ||
| All garbage. | ||
| All BS. | ||
| Musk's plan was, in fact, I think Musk might already be staying now technically beyond what the original deal was. | ||
| If not, it's coming up in a couple days. | ||
| Yeah, there's the Atlantic headline. | ||
| The decline and fall of Elon Musk. | ||
| The Tesla founder becomes the latest government employee to lose his job. | ||
| Just complete garbage. | ||
| I mean, utter and complete garbage. | ||
| And that's another learning curve. | ||
| Musk has gone through it. | ||
| We've gone through it at Infowars, obviously, too. | ||
| And I try to express this and explain this learning curve to people because it's an extremely important life experience, but it's also very rare to actually be in this position where... | ||
| I mean, use Alex Jones, another guy. | ||
| Garbage headlines, garbage stories 24-7. | ||
| And then that creates a bunch of false narratives. | ||
| And so I've learned through that experience, like, wow, people will read this stuff and actually believe it. | ||
| People will read this stuff and have all these ideas and stuff about Alex Jones. | ||
| Meanwhile, I've been working for Alex Jones for almost 10 years. | ||
| I know him personally. | ||
| I know his family. | ||
| Work with them almost every day. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's like, I know you're wrong. | |
| And yet you see people every day printing this stuff, publishing this stuff, talking about this stuff like they know they're right. | ||
| They know the real story about Alex Jones. | ||
| And I'm sitting here like, I know you're wrong. | ||
| So that's a learning curve to go through that experience, not only to learn how the fake news works, be a victim of the fake news, but then watch how other people think they know the truth and then they have no idea. | ||
| And they're just totally wrong and they're embarrassing themselves. | ||
| Not even realizing it. | ||
| And so the same thing happens now to Musk. | ||
| And now he's obviously gone through that learning curve at an exponential rate. | ||
| But now it's, oh yeah, Musk is losing his job. | ||
| Trump is sick of Musk. | ||
| All this garbage. | ||
| He was already supposed to be gone by May. | ||
| He might even be past his time. | ||
| And yeah, he obviously needs to get back to Tesla. | ||
| They're about to launch these new robots. | ||
| They're about to launch the automated taxi. | ||
| He still wants to get to Mars with SpaceX. | ||
| He's working on deals with the boring company to actually get some new rail lines that work or actually get built. | ||
| Starlink is changing how internet communication works. | ||
| So it's like, yeah, you know, maybe he goes back to the private sector eventually. | ||
| That's not him losing his job. | ||
| That's not him getting fired. | ||
| It's just, it's complete and utter garbage. | ||
| And I see this stuff get chewed up and spit out all day long. | ||
| And so then they run these hit pieces, and this reporter here, I guess, kind of falls for it. | ||
| Maybe there is an element of truth. | ||
| Maybe it's there. | ||
| They say, well, you're not going to get your $2 trillion in cuts. | ||
| And Musk is like, well, that's not because we can't make $2 trillion in cuts. | ||
| It's because we're an advisory committee. | ||
| And the corrupt politicians in D.C. don't want $2 trillion in cuts. | ||
| So sure, we could have $2 trillion in cuts tomorrow, but we're an advisory group. | ||
| We don't actually make the laws. | ||
| But it's the same thing. | ||
| Oh, Musk is getting fired. | ||
| Oh, Musk is poor. | ||
| Oh, Musk is losing control. | ||
| Musk this. | ||
| It's just all garbage. | ||
| And in fact, Musk and Trump have actually now worked out a deal. | ||
| Where even when he does have a much smaller role as far as the day-to-day and just being in Washington, D.C. with President Trump, he will continue to be an advisor. | ||
| So that's what I'm saying. | ||
| There's no two trillion in cuts. | ||
| Yeah, there are. | ||
| D.C. is corrupt and doesn't want them. | ||
| Musk is declining and he's a failure. | ||
| Nope, still the richest man in the world, actually richer than anybody's ever been, probably. | ||
| As far as the rankings are concerned. | ||
| The latest numbers were Musk was like $420 billion. | ||
| Funny enough. | ||
| And then Zuckerberg was like $220. | ||
| So he's almost doubling up the next guy. | ||
| Oh, he's failing! | ||
| Oh, he's on decline! | ||
| Oh, Tesla stock's crashing! | ||
| Just went up, probably going to go up again. | ||
| Oh, Trump's fired! | ||
| Musk is fired by Trump! | ||
| Musk is losing his job! | ||
| No, he's not. | ||
| He's going to have a permanent advisory role. | ||
| He's going back to one of his, what, nine companies? | ||
| It's just all garbage. | ||
| It's all fake news. | ||
| It's insane. | ||
| But this is what we deal with. | ||
| So, okay, will we get two trillion in cuts? | ||
| Maybe, maybe not. | ||
| You could. | ||
| But corrupt DC doesn't want it. | ||
| Is Musk on the decline? | ||
| Is Musk a failure? | ||
| Nope. | ||
| Still the richest man in the world. | ||
| Owns four different companies that are changing the future of humanity. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Musk fired by Trump. | ||
| Nope. | ||
| Actually going to be signed on as a permanent advisor for the rest of the administration. | ||
| So you see, they just tell you the complete opposite and then people just believe it. | ||
| And Musk sits there and he's like, I'm talking to a computer now. | ||
| I'm not even talking to a person. | ||
| This is like talking to some AI algorithm that's not even real. | ||
| So then he has to go into this explanation about what's actually going on. | ||
| Now, this all kind of leads us into what's going on with this spending bill. | ||
| And it's kind of the same crap. | ||
| But it turns out what I thought yesterday looks like is true. | ||
| I think Mike Johnson... | ||
| I don't know, maybe saying he was lying to President Trump might be a little on the far side of it. | ||
| Could still be accurate, but he was selling a false bill of confidence to Trump. | ||
| And he was giving Trump an inaccurate depiction of what was really going on behind the scenes. | ||
| And led Trump to believe that they were all going to come together on the bill. | ||
| But it actually gets even worse because... | ||
| You've got the salt Republicans, which are Republicans in the House in blue states, that don't want to get rid of the salt deduction because their voters benefit from it. | ||
| The salt deduction needs to be gone entirely. | ||
| It's just a robbery of red states. | ||
| It's ridiculous. | ||
| Republican states should not be subsidizing Democrat states, and that's exactly what they do. | ||
| So it really just needs to go, but you have that issue. | ||
| Then you have the fiscal conservatives and the fiscal hawks and the Freedom Caucus that are serious about spending cuts, that are serious about Doge results, and so they've kind of been serving as an obstacle as well. | ||
| But last night, there was supposed to be a rules vote. | ||
| They didn't have it. | ||
| But the White House, the Freedom Caucus, and the Salt Republicans, They all had agreed on a concept for a bill. | ||
| They all had agreed on some baseline things that they could have gotten past and Johnson could have had the votes. | ||
| And then he spiked it this morning. | ||
| And nobody knows why and nobody knows what the hell is going on. | ||
| And so some of the headlines here, this is totally inaccurate, but it just gives you a picture of what's going on behind the scenes. | ||
| The Republican Party is being torn apart by Trump's new tax bill. | ||
| It's not what's going on. | ||
| The Republican Party is having serious debate and considerations about how to pass this bill and try to please as many people as possible and make sure that they have the votes when it goes to the floor. | ||
| So yeah, there's some serious political debate happening. | ||
| That's good. | ||
| And you're not going to hear me complaining about fiscal conservatives being an obstacle to this bill passing. | ||
| You'll hear other people in the MAGA movement complain about that, and that's fine. | ||
| But I'm not going to. | ||
| I will celebrate it. | ||
| Mike Johnson faces 11th hour blow up on Trump's big bill. | ||
| Oh, you mean he told Trump that it was going well and they had the votes? | ||
| Then they had reached a deal with the votes and then Mike Johnson spiked it. | ||
| So I don't know what the hell's going on with that. | ||
| But it really just shows Johnson's lack of leadership, lack of transparency. | ||
| I don't know what is going on with him. | ||
| And I will tell you also, there is becoming a bit of a rift now in the Republican Party. | ||
| And it's because Johnson just has no leadership skills at all. | ||
| Just none. | ||
| So a lot of them, after these discussions last night, went home thinking, okay, we might have something here. | ||
| Then they woke up, went to the Capitol this morning, and Mike Johnson said, no, we have nothing. | ||
| And they said, what the hell? | ||
| Finally had some momentum. | ||
| Looked like you were finally doing what Trump wanted you to do after you misrepresented what was going on. | ||
| And then they showed up, and it was like, nope, not going to happen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| So there's growing frustration. | ||
| There is some growing frustration. | ||
| I think most of it is at Mike Johnson after this morning. | ||
| I do think they will eventually produce a bill that they can get the votes on. | ||
| It's not going to be that clean. | ||
| It's not going to have the cuts that we want. | ||
| But it'll have enough to get the votes. | ||
| There's a lot of kind of confusion right now about what is really going on in the last 12 hours. | ||
| Now, we're going to move on from this. | ||
| We do have, though, a longer video of the Freedom Caucus explaining what was going on this morning. | ||
| If we have time, we'll play that. | ||
| I also want to get to this RFK Jr. audio. | ||
| We got a ton of that today. | ||
| From a hearing and then him talking about the World Health Organization. | ||
| So we're going to have all that as well. | ||
| Oh, and guess what else they're now revealing to you? | ||
| Was anything real about the Biden presidency? | ||
| No, it looks like the whole thing was fake. | ||
| But, oh, it's CNN and it's the Democrats in the media. | ||
| They're the ones breaking the story. | ||
| And Jake Tapper's book tour is quite frankly hilarious now. | ||
| We'll play some of that. | ||
| And then I got the geopolitical news. | ||
| It's all coming up as we close out the first hour of the show. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, I really want to thank you for your continued support at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And this is your daily reminder to take your optimal human drink mix. | ||
| Now, if you don't have it, that means you need to go to thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Get yourself a canister. | ||
| Now, you can try it out one time. | ||
| See if you like it. | ||
| You will like it. | ||
| It's great for your health. | ||
| It helps support the broadcast. | ||
| But if you subscribe, you get a discount. | ||
| You get it auto-shipped. | ||
| And it's just, that's the way to go. | ||
| Why not take advantage of the discount? | ||
| Why not take advantage of the auto-ship? | ||
| Plus, if it does sell out on the store, we always keep it in stock for our subscribers. | ||
| So that's the Superfood Greens Optimal Human Drink Mix. | ||
| This thing is just incredible. | ||
| I would need like 10 minutes. | ||
| To read off all the great ingredients of this thing. | ||
| Not just the high levels, some over 100% of vitamins and minerals like vitamin A, vitamin B6, vitamin B12, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin K, riboflavin, biotin, calcium, iron, on and on and on. | ||
| And then it's all the different blends. | ||
| The nutrient-rich superfood blend, the immune antioxidant blend, the gut health and digestive support blend. | ||
| The adaptogen blend, the nootropic and cognitive function blend, the liver health and detox blend, cardiovascular and heart health blend, and the joint support blend. | ||
| This thing is just loaded. | ||
| And some things that I just isolate for a supplement, which is just hard to come by quality sources for, it's all in this superfood drink mix. | ||
| Like CoQ10, turmeric root, ginger root. | ||
| Wheatgrass. | ||
| And so much more. | ||
| Just incredible what they've done with this drink mix. | ||
| Optimal Human Superfood Drink Mix. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| Subscribe for auto ship. | ||
| Guaranteed in stock. | ||
| And a discount. | ||
| It's all happening at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| We appreciate your continued support. | ||
| Alright, I want to get to some audio here of RFK Jr. | ||
| First, there was a congressional hearing today where he explained a lot of things going on now with HHS. | ||
| And then there's also a video presentation he does explaining what's going on with the World Health Organization. | ||
| There's some other news surrounding that. | ||
| So we're going to do that on the other side. | ||
| But first, let's go here. | ||
| Tammy Baldwin on the attack of RFK Jr. during the hearing clip 18. Is it Doge? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Reviewing NIH funding opportunity announcements? | |
| Is it Doge reviewing NIH grant award? | ||
| We've got administrators, we're cutting waste, we're cutting duplicative programs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you're funding $3 billion less in biomedical research than you did a year prior? | |
| We're spending less on administration of those programs. | ||
|
unidentified
|
3,200 fewer grants. | |
| Many of the grants were terminated because they were grants that were not advancing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
These aren't grants terminated. | |
| These are grants not awarded because the panels weren't convened. | ||
| Senator, we spend 70% of the world's biomedical research out of NIH. | ||
| 70%. | ||
| And we're the sickest country in the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Would cutting $18 billion or 40% from the NIH budget slow the development of new treatments? | |
| And we are the sickest country in the world, so that money has not been well spent. | ||
| We've had a 38% increase. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll ask you, is funding for Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers DEI? | |
| Because you're holding up $65 million for 14 of those centers in nine states, including the University of Wisconsin-Madison. | ||
| Is funding for cancer centers DEI? | ||
| Because you're holding up $47 million in cancer center support grants at nine cancer centers in eight states. | ||
| Is funding for rare disease research DEI? | ||
| Because you're holding up $55 million for 11 rare disease clinical research network grants in eight states. | ||
| These are just a few examples. | ||
| And the list goes on and on, Secretary Kennedy. | ||
| I've run out of time. | ||
| I yield back. | ||
| *laughs* | ||
| This is a fun game we're playing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. Secretary, let's talk about clinical trials. | |
| Ask questions and don't give me a chance to answer them. | ||
| Don't give me time to answer them. | ||
| Now, of course, that's just another lying Democrat misrepresenting what's going on. | ||
| And we'll get a brief explainer from Kennedy on the other side of this break. | ||
| But let's give you an analogy. | ||
| Let's give an analogy to understand what Tammy Baldwin is misrepresenting here. | ||
| Imagine I'm a gold or an oil prospector. | ||
| And so my job is to go out and find areas to mine for gold or oil. | ||
| And I'm charging, forget about the accuracy of the numbers, I'm charging a million dollars. | ||
| So somebody's paying me a million dollars to go prospect for gold, prospect for oil. | ||
| And I'm producing, let's say, let's say $10,000 worth of oil profits, gold profits, whatever it is, for the company funding me. | ||
| Well, eventually they're going to say, hmm, we're paying you a million dollars for this, but you're not producing near your value here. | ||
| What's going on? | ||
| And then I come back and I say, well, you know, I had to buy all of this equipment. | ||
| I had to buy all of this equipment. | ||
| Oh, really? | ||
| Who'd you buy the equipment from? | ||
| Well, it's all my friends' companies. | ||
| All my friends here, you know, I told them I got a million dollars a year, and so I said, hey. | ||
| You know, I have a startup company here and you can get some of this funding. | ||
| Results don't even matter. | ||
| The money's already incoming from the government. | ||
| Nobody's doing any oversight. | ||
| Nobody cares. | ||
| It's just rubber stamped. | ||
| So it doesn't matter. | ||
| I'm not producing any results. | ||
| Nobody's benefiting from paying me except my friends and myself. | ||
| But nobody's getting any results. | ||
| So Kennedy looks at the NIH and other things going on with... | ||
| Medical funding of these institutions, and they're not providing any results. | ||
| It's all administrative costs. | ||
| It's all equipment costs that doesn't get used. | ||
| And he says, hey, we're just cutting this out. | ||
| We're going to run more efficient. | ||
| And Tammy Baldwin just says, oh my gosh. | ||
| That's what they do. | ||
| You're stopping cancer research. | ||
| You're stopping deadly disease research. | ||
| No, he's stopping wasteful spending, you liar. | ||
| Now, he got a minute. | ||
| To talk about how to spend this money more efficiently, it's not about trying to stop beneficial research or even just anything benefiting the American people health-wise, which obviously hasn't worked. | ||
| It's never about results. | ||
| Have you noticed that with the Democrats? | ||
| It's never about results. | ||
| It's just about spending. | ||
| Spend all this money on electric charging stations. | ||
| What's the result? | ||
| None. | ||
| Spend all this money on the internet connection infrastructure bill. | ||
| What's the results? | ||
| None. | ||
| Spend all this money on combating homelessness. | ||
| What's the results? | ||
| None. | ||
| They sure spend money, though. | ||
| Democrats, they can spend money very well. | ||
| Get results? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| Don't ask them for results. | ||
| And the same thing happens in the healthcare industry. | ||
| So Kennedy talks about how to make it more efficient here briefly in clip 15. You hate medical research? | ||
| No, I think we need to lead the world in medical research in this country. | ||
| In fact, isn't it true, Mr. Secretary, that you would like to see more money spent on medical research? | ||
| Obviously, I'm the secretary of this department. | ||
| No secretary wants to see his budget cut. | ||
| Well, one way of doing that, it seems to me, would be to stop some of the stealing. | ||
| And let me tell you what I mean by that. | ||
| Let's suppose you give, NIH gives a university $100 million to research, for medical research, to research a cure. | ||
| And that university takes 30 million of it, doesn't spend it on the research. | ||
| They use it to subsidize the rest of their university. | ||
| Is that a... | ||
| Does that show a commitment to medical research? | ||
| No, and I mentioned before the example of Stanford, which was taking 78% in indirect costs, and we don't know what they were spending on it. | ||
| That's theft, isn't it? | ||
| It's not a good way to spend federal taxpayer dollars. | ||
| We call that stealing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, Senator Kennedy from Louisiana. | |
| He's just a bit of a legend. | ||
| You gotta give that to him. | ||
| Let me just do this live. | ||
| I'm not sure. | ||
| We may have doubled up this clip, or it may have been an expansion of what they were just talking about. | ||
| Guys, let me see clip 14. Is there any doubt in your mind that a lot of universities are taking this NIH money, which is supposed to be spent on medical research, and using it to fund other parts of their university? | ||
| Is there any doubt in your mind, Bobby? | ||
| Oh, and Senator... | ||
| The other people who are writing grants, like the Gates Foundation, the Rockefeller Foundation, they paid 10% to 15% in indirect costs. | ||
| We were paying 50, 60, 70%. | ||
| So, in fact, what you're doing is adding money to medical research. | ||
| We will be able to fund many, many, many more studies by eliminating that $9 billion, at least part of that $9 billion cost. | ||
| So, what he's saying, which completely goes against Democrat liar, Senator Duckworth, or excuse me, Baldwin, he's saying, actually, we can have a smaller budget and spend more efficiently when you cut the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| And this just drives Democrats crazy. | ||
| Because this is how they pay off their friends. | ||
| Pay off their social movements. | ||
| Pay off themselves. | ||
| They live off waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| So you can't cut the waste, fraud, and abuse and then actually show that you can spend efficiently because that destroys the Democrats. | ||
| So that's why they're all panicked about this. | ||
| Now, Kennedy asks about why the food in America is so bad here. | ||
| Kennedy responds, clip 13. I got 18 seconds. | ||
| Why do we allow highly processed foods in America? | ||
| That's a complicated question, but it's driven by profits to a food industry that is making money by poisoning American kids, and they don't do it abroad. | ||
| They make the same products for Canada and for Europe that do not contain many of those chemicals. | ||
| You know, it's really a crazy thing. | ||
| When you kind of get into the habit of reading ingredient labels, it's a lot different when you're traveling than, say, when you're going to your grocery store to get your groceries, where then you know what you're getting, so you don't really necessarily need to read the ingredients on everything you're getting. | ||
| You're getting the same things. | ||
| You know what you like. | ||
| You know what you trust. | ||
| But when you're traveling, it's always insane to me, because that's just a habit now. | ||
| If there's something... | ||
| I'm going to eat that I don't know much about. | ||
| I'll go look at the ingredients. | ||
| I mean, it's almost impossible to avoid these things. | ||
| It's almost impossible to avoid all these toxic chemicals and all the garbage that they just put into just a bag of peanuts. | ||
| And it's just like, wait, you don't have to do this. | ||
| So we'll see how much success we can have on that. | ||
| Even just providing the alternative, as I think part of the Make America Healthy Again movement is beyond just a political thing. | ||
| It's a cultural thing. | ||
| And this is how the free market wins. | ||
| Once you start providing alternative options, the market shifts. | ||
| They came out with the... | ||
| What's the name of the project? | ||
| Project Non-GMO, I believe. | ||
| Probably about 10 years or so ago. | ||
| And they started working with these food companies. | ||
| And if you have a non-GMO food product that passes their standards, they'll put their stamp, their non-GMO stamp, on their food packaging. | ||
| This changed a lot of grocery shopping culture. | ||
| Especially for somebody like me. | ||
| Non-GMO and the other is GMO. | ||
| I know which one I'm leaning towards if not guaranteed I'm going with. | ||
| So that's how the free market can dominate this stuff. | ||
| Once you have healthy alternative options that don't have the seed oils, all the added sugars and fats and other preservatives, the free market will reward those options. | ||
| Guaranteed, just like the non-GMO project has had such a success in changing just Consumers options right there. | ||
| Now, we got a funny thing from Kennedy coming up. | ||
| We'll put that on the side for a second. | ||
| So there's this other news on the World Health Organization here. | ||
| Oh, the poor World Health Organization. | ||
| WHO cries it's out of money, facing an existential crisis after U.S. funding cuts. | ||
| Oh, boo-hoo. | ||
| Oh, oh, what will we do without the World Health Organization? | ||
| Now, what's funny is, aside from the tears that we're obviously shedding here, that the World Health Organization is crying broke now, do we as Americans ever get sick of subsidizing all of this crap? | ||
| Do we as American taxpayers? | ||
| Ever get sick of being forced to pay for all these different globalist enterprises, global government garbage? | ||
| NATO, WHO, I mean, you name it, it's non-stop. | ||
| When do we, the American taxpayer, just stand up and say, enough is enough? | ||
| Oh, but we'll be broke! | ||
| Not my problem, Jack! | ||
| I'm broke! | ||
| But we won't, we'll be broke, we'll run out of funding if we don't have the U.S. taxpayer's money. | ||
| I'm out of money! | ||
| I'm out of funding. | ||
| I can't afford a house. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't give a damn about you being out of money. | |
| Why don't you give me some money? | ||
| Oh, they're poor, which I doubt is even true. | ||
| But guess who's stepping in? | ||
| Now, this will be interesting. | ||
| And this is totally being used against the American people. | ||
| And Tedros, the director general, Of the WHO. | ||
| He's totally going to be calling President Trump and try to twist his arm over this. | ||
| And it just shows you that's a political body. | ||
| It has nothing to do with health. | ||
| It's all a political body. | ||
| China to donate $500 million to WHO. | ||
| Stepping into the gap left by the United States. | ||
| Actually, guys, do me a favor. | ||
| Will you see, was that what the U.S. was paying annually to the World Health Organization? | ||
| See if you can give me a number. | ||
| I thought it might have been even more than that. | ||
| Either way, whether it's $500 million or more, I'm okay with cutting that funding to the WHO. | ||
| I won't lose any sleep over it. | ||
| But now, you know the WHO is going to call the Trump administration or get a hold of somebody, if not Trump, Kennedy, somebody, and they're going to say, hey. | ||
| You know, China is now stepping in to fill the gap you left. | ||
| What do you think about that? | ||
| Maybe we'll be more favorable to China. | ||
| Maybe we'll run some more operations for China to benefit China. | ||
| Like, you wouldn't want another pandemic now, would you? | ||
| You wouldn't want us to help aid in a pandemic scare or pandemic and then not help when the time comes, would you? | ||
| Oh, they wouldn't do that at the World Health Organization. | ||
| Oh, hell yeah, they would. | ||
| So, yeah, I thought the U.S. was paying more than $500 million a year. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'd probably need a little bit more data here, but it looks like the U.S. was paying probably at least a billion a year to the World Health Organization, so China doesn't totally fill that gap. | ||
| But that's not even the point. | ||
| This is all to call the Trump White House or RFK Jr. and say, oh, China's with us now. | ||
| Well, it's not going to work. | ||
| But you know that's what they're going to do. | ||
| Now, RFK Jr. did this video presentation talking about the World Health Organization as they're obviously going to try to do some scare tactic here like, oh, we're with China now. | ||
| How do you like that? | ||
| Okay, fine. | ||
| Bye. | ||
| And just think about it too. | ||
| America, like 330 million, give or take, all the illegals, everything else. | ||
| China multi-billions, and then we still paid more than them to the WHO? | ||
| Oh, I'm so upset the WHO is broke. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| You're not going to get any of my money anymore, and you're going to have to call up China that's going to pay even less with more people. | ||
| Oh, no. | ||
| Enjoy. | ||
| So here's RFK Jr. breaking it all down, clip 17. To my colleagues in public health, I'm Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., the U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary. | ||
| As you know, President Trump has made the decision to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization. | ||
| I'd like to take this opportunity to offer some background to that decision and, more importantly, to chart a future path toward global cooperation on health and health security. | ||
| Like many legacy institutions, the WHO has become mired in bureaucratic bloat, entrenched paradigms, conflicts of interest, and international power politics. | ||
| While the United States has provided the lion's share of the organization's funding historically, other countries, such as China, Have exerted undue influence over its operations in ways that serve their own interests and not particularly the interests of the global public. | ||
| This all became obvious during the COVID pandemic when the WHO, under pressure from China, suppressed reports at critical junctures of human-to-human transmission and then worked with China to promote the fiction. | ||
| That COVID originated from bats or pangolins rather than from a Chinese government-sponsored research at a biolab in Wuhan. | ||
| Not only has the WHO capitulated to political pressure from China, it's also failed to maintain an organization characterized by transparency and fair governance by and for its member states. | ||
| The WHO often acts like it has forgotten that its members must remain accountable to their own citizens and not to transnational or corporate interests. | ||
| Now, I believe that, for the most part, the staff of the WHO are conscientious people who sincerely believe in what they're doing. | ||
| And indeed, the WHO has, since its inception, accomplished important work, including the eradication of smallpox. | ||
| Too often, though, WHO's priorities have increasingly reflected the biases and interests of corporate medicine. | ||
| Too often it has allowed political agendas, like pushing harmful gender ideology, to hijack its core mission. | ||
| And too often it has become the tool of politics and turned its back on promoting health and health security. | ||
| Global cooperation on health is still critically important to President Trump and myself. | ||
| But it isn't working very well under the WHO, as the failures of the COVID era demonstrate. | ||
| The WHO has not even come to terms with its failures during COVID, let alone made significant reforms. | ||
| Instead, it has doubled down with the pandemic agreement, which will lock in all of the dysfunctions of the WHO pandemic response. | ||
| Well, we're not going to participate in that. | ||
| We need to reboot the whole system as we are doing in the United States. | ||
| Here in the United States, we're going to continue to focus on infectious disease and pandemic preparedness. | ||
| But we're also fundamentally shifting the priorities of our health agencies to focus on chronic diseases, which are prevalent in the United States. | ||
| It's the chronic disease epidemic that is sickening our people and bankrupting our health care system. | ||
| We're now pivoting to make our healthcare system more responsive to this reality. | ||
| We're going to make healthcare in the United States serve the needs of the public instead of industry profit-taking. | ||
| We're removing food dyes and other harmful additives from our food supply. | ||
| We're investigating the causes of autism and other chronic diseases. | ||
| We're seeking to reduce consumption of ultra-processed foods. | ||
| And we're going to support lifestyle changes that will bolster the immune systems and transform the health of our people. | ||
| Few of these efforts lend themselves easily to profits or serve established special interests. | ||
| These changes can only occur through the kind of systemic overhaul that President Trump has brought to our country. | ||
| We'd like to see a similar reordering of priorities on the global stage, especially considering the fact that through the leadership of the United States and funding from our country over the past 25 years, millions of global citizens have seen a reduction in premature death due to HIV, TB, and malaria. | ||
| Let's return to the core focus of global health and global health security. | ||
| Back to reducing infectious disease burden and the spread of diseases of pandemic potential. | ||
| I urge the world's health ministers and the WHO to take our withdrawal from the organization as a wake-up call. | ||
| It isn't that President Trump and I have lost interest in international cooperation. | ||
| Not at all. | ||
| We just want it to happen in a way that's fair and efficient and transparent for all the member states. | ||
| We've already been in contact with like-minded countries and we encourage others to consider joining us. | ||
| We want a free international health cooperation from the straitjacket of political interference by corrupting influences of the pharmaceutical companies of adversarial nations and their NGO proxies. | ||
| I would like to take this opportunity to invite my fellow health ministers around the world into a new era of cooperation. | ||
| We don't have to suffer the limits of a more abundant WHO. | ||
| Let's create new institutions or revisit existing institutions that are lean, efficient, transparent, and accountable. | ||
| Whether it's an emergency outbreak of an infectious disease or the pervasive rot of chronic conditions that have been overtaking not just America but the whole world, we're ready to work with you. | ||
| Thank you and may God bless you and let's all pray for the health of our children and our grandchildren. | ||
| I don't know how anybody could disagree with that. | ||
| And a lot of what he just said would have been modern, you know, left liberal talking points just five years ago. | ||
| But imagine you had a friend that was extremely overweight, obese, suffering from health issues, and said, hey, I'm going to start taking this weight loss drug, whatever it is. | ||
| And you see them again three months later, and they're even more fat, less healthy. | ||
| You say, hey, how's that weight loss drug going? | ||
| And they say, oh yeah, taking it every day. | ||
| It's like, yeah, that's not working. | ||
| It's kind of like, you know, Trump made that joke about the fat shot. | ||
| You'd say, maybe try something else. | ||
| It's not working. | ||
| Try something else. | ||
| So that's what RFK Jr. is saying. | ||
| He's saying, look at all the things we've tried to institutionalize with the health of Americans, the World Health Organization. | ||
| It hasn't worked. | ||
| It's time to revisit. | ||
| And of course, it's all by design. | ||
| It's all about population control. | ||
| Same reason why they put cancer in the shots. | ||
| It's just population control. | ||
| Keep the planet's population down. | ||
| Think about how evil that is. | ||
| Because that's what's really behind all of this. | ||
| Creating diseases in labs and everything else. | ||
| Having protocols to go into the hospital with COVID that kills you. | ||
| It's not about killing you. | ||
| Killing you, that's just one person. | ||
| They're talking about they want to kill you. | ||
| They want to kill your entire lineage. | ||
| They want to kill your entire gene pool. | ||
| They don't want you to have a kid that might have another kid that might need 10 great-grandkids and then 30 more kids. | ||
| They've got to cut all that. | ||
| They've got to kill that entire human line of existence. | ||
| The managers of the planet, the rationers of the planet. | ||
| Now, I'm not big into the population collapse thing as big of an issue as other people are. | ||
| It's not a big issue to me. | ||
| The story to me is it's all by design. | ||
| It's all population control. | ||
| And when you understand that, now it starts to make sense. | ||
| Gee, why would these leading health institutions be against basic health and promoting things that actually don't promote health? | ||
| Like a COVID vaccine. | ||
| By the way, there's news on that too. | ||
| So we'll have that coming up. | ||
| But you know, that's why... | ||
| You know, really, if you look at modern-day health science and technology, it's extremely beneficial, but you're not going to get it promoted by mainstream health institutions. | ||
| That's why you have to go and find out supplements that you trust that benefit you and the health desires that you have, and that's what we've done at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Whether it's the Shilajit Complex capsules or the gummies, whether it's the CMOS capsules or gummies, whether it's the super... | ||
| Food, drink mix, Optimal Human that I talk about, and so much more at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| That's what we do. | ||
| And this is just basic modern-day science where we just say, hey, here's a vitamin, here's a mineral that's beneficial for human health for these different reasons, and we can extract it, and you can put it in a drink mix, you can put it in a capsule, you can put it in a gummy, and you can benefit. | ||
| So that's what we like to do. | ||
| And we got all kinds of different options for you at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| Of course, the crew here loves the gummies, whether it's the Sheila Jeet gummies or the Seamoss gummies. | ||
| We're big fans of the gummies here. | ||
| I just like the capsules just because it's easy to just put, you know, 10 capsules into your hand and then drink them down and just be good for your supplements for the day. | ||
| So that's what I do, chase it down with the Optimal Human Drink Mix. | ||
| Yeah, we want you to live a happy and healthy life, and it's a great formula. | ||
| You shop at the AlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| You get a great supplement for your health, and you also support us to keep us on the air. | ||
| That's a 360 win. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| We appreciate your continued support. | ||
| All right, one more thing from RFK Jr., and then the COVID vaccine news coming up. | ||
| Wait, RFK Jr. said what? | ||
| China is putting gay chemicals in the vapes. | ||
| Coupled with fruity pina colada, flavoring agents, many nicotine enjoyers in this country, are on the business end of an all-out circus of predatory endocrine warfare. | ||
| Life isn't meant to be a strawberry margarita sideshow for flamers, okay? | ||
| So my team and I have partnered with Tucker Carlson and Al Pouches to help pivot away from the blight of vaporized Chinese homosexuality. | ||
| Questions? | ||
| Yes, okay, it was AI. | ||
| It could have had you fooled, though. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The AI getting a little scary out there. | |
| I think the beer probably on the desk might have given it away if you were watching it. | ||
| There is actually some crazy stories about what these vape juices coming in from China have in them. | ||
| That's a whole other issue that's being fought in Florida and other states. | ||
| But another issue for another day. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let me address something else here. | ||
| This happened at Marco Rubio's hearing yesterday. | ||
| They sent some protesters in there, the Democrats did. | ||
| Notice, when the Democrats actually... | ||
| Have a strategy and a plan to bring in these protesters into the Capitol. | ||
| Nobody cries insurrection or claims them of, you know, planning some disruption like they did with Republicans on January 6th inaccurately. | ||
| But nonetheless, they send their protesters into the Rubio hearing. | ||
| And it was sent to me, and it happens a lot because of obviously what I went through when I disrupted a hearing. | ||
| I want you to watch this video, and since this got sent to me a lot, I want to address what happened here. | ||
| But here it is, this crazy leftist lady gets removed from Rubio's hearing in clip 20. Now, | ||
| I want to address a couple things. | ||
| But first, let me address the issue that is being brought to my attention, why people are sending me this clip. | ||
| And they're obviously asking the question, dealing with the political double standards of, will these people face the same fate as Owen Troyer? | ||
| Which, of course, I... | ||
| Went to jail. | ||
| I had, I think, 40 hours of community service. | ||
| I was on probation for years. | ||
| Subjected to drug tests. | ||
| And I don't even remember what else. | ||
| But the point is, I was punished severely for a 50-second disruption. | ||
| So people are saying, will they face the same punishment as Owen Troyer? | ||
| Likely, no. | ||
| And I can already tell you just from what I'm seeing in this video, no, but I will also tell you when we were ongoing with my trial, because it actually never really got settled because of COVID, and then they lied about it, and then ultimately after the January 6th indictment, they just dropped it as part of a different agreement. | ||
| But we already knew with higher profile cases like David Hogg that no. | ||
| In fact, I was even told who was the Hollywood actress. | ||
| Forget who it was. | ||
| But we looked into it. | ||
| Yeah, when leftists disrupt congressional hearings, they do not get charged like I did. | ||
| And even if they get brought to the station, a call comes in from the D.C. police higher-ups and they say, cut them loose. | ||
| Now, the exact opposite happened with me. | ||
| Because if you watch this video, so yeah, Owen Schroer is the only one that gets charged for disrupting Congress. | ||
| Liberals do not. | ||
| And this is from proof that we have from court developments or lack thereof with other incidents and directly from D.C. police officers who told me, yeah, if leftists even make it down here, we're told to cut them loose. | ||
| That was told to me when I was brought in. | ||
| And then they used one famous lady's example. | ||
| I forget her name. | ||
| Now, if you notice, they're getting walked out and cut loose. | ||
| Unlike me, who they held up, waited to get orders from above that told them, no, you're bringing them in, you're putting them in jail, we're charging them. | ||
| For them, they'll probably just get cut loose. | ||
| If they even get a citation, it'll probably get dropped. | ||
| Now, the other difference for some of them is, They were resisting arrest. | ||
| Now, that lady there, probably not. | ||
| She doesn't get resisting arrest. | ||
| But the other two that are fighting the police officers and refusing to walk out, to me, that's resisting arrest. | ||
| I'd charge them with that. | ||
| That right there, that's resisting arrest. | ||
| You should get a ticket for resisting arrest. | ||
| But for the people that are saying, hey, will they face the same punishment as Owen Schroer? | ||
| Do we still have the political double standards? | ||
| Let me make something very clear, and I've said it many times. | ||
| I do not believe any of these people should be charged. | ||
| I believe, even though I may agree, may disagree, it doesn't matter to me with what they're saying, this is perfectly legal First Amendment activity. | ||
| I believe it is well within our documented rights, our First Amendment rights, to stand up and disrupt a congressional hearing. | ||
| Now, you get whatever limited amount of time, once law enforcement shows up and says it's time to go, It's time to go. | ||
| Now you resist arrest, now you can deal with a charge. | ||
| But for standing up and executing your First Amendment right, I do not believe there should be charges. | ||
| I should have never been charged, and no leftist protesters should ever be charged. | ||
| It is First Amendment activity, whether I think it's, whether I agree with it or not, whether I think it's... | ||
| Completely bat crap crazy? | ||
| Doesn't matter. | ||
| That's First Amendment activity. | ||
| I will die on that hill. | ||
| I believe that to be true. | ||
| I don't want to see any of these leftists go to jail for their First Amendment activity, whether I agree with what they're saying or not. | ||
| You resist arrest? | ||
| Different story. | ||
| But I keep seeing people saying, oh, you know, they need to go to jail like Owen Schroyer did. | ||
| No, they don't. | ||
| No, they don't. | ||
| Nobody should go to jail for their speech. | ||
| Nobody should go to jail. | ||
| For standing up and speaking their mind, redress of grievances with government during a congressional hearing. | ||
| Nobody should. | ||
| Not Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Not lefto-liberal activist protesters. | ||
| Nobody. | ||
| Resist arrest? | ||
| Different story. | ||
| Deal with them. | ||
| But nobody should have to deal with that. | ||
| So no, I'm not cheering for any of them to go to jail. | ||
| I'm not cheering for that because I want one standard approach to anybody. | ||
| I want one standard approach of, that's free speech. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I mean, really, is there a better example? | ||
| A congressional hearing that you protest with free speech? | ||
| Seems like that should be a perfect example of First Amendment activity. | ||
| But there you go. | ||
| Now, I do think a couple of them should probably get a citation or spend a little time in a cell for resisting arrest. | ||
| But that's a different story. | ||
| So with everybody sending me that video, I felt that we should at least respond here. | ||
| But no, I don't believe they should go to jail like I did. | ||
| I believe that's First Amendment activity. | ||
| But then it's like, I have to come out here and continue to correct the record, and AI gets it wrong too, and so it kind of shows you how even AI gets misled by fake news. | ||
| They say I didn't complete the community service. | ||
| Yes, I did. | ||
| The court wouldn't take it because of COVID. | ||
| I completed all my probation. | ||
| They just wouldn't close the case because of COVID. | ||
| And then they decided, oh, we're just going to reopen the case because of January 6th. | ||
| And then they wrote fake stories saying, oh, I violated some probation on January 6th. | ||
| Another total lie. | ||
| Schroyer was banned from the Capitol. | ||
| No, I wasn't. | ||
| Schroyer was banned from D.C. No, I wasn't. | ||
| Schroyer was banned from Capitol Grounds. | ||
| No, I wasn't. | ||
| The documents. | ||
| I was banned from disrupting Congress, is what I was banned from. | ||
| By the time I got to the Capitol, they already shut things down. | ||
| They already had all the congressmen running out of there, running to the basement. | ||
| So I didn't disrupt any congressional hearings. | ||
| I never went into the Capitol. | ||
| So they just lie about everything. | ||
| But that's a separate issue. | ||
| So let's just move on then, shall we? | ||
| All right. | ||
| This is just crazy stuff. | ||
| I suppose we can go to, let's see, do we have the, where's the Jake Tapper? | ||
| Yeah, let's start with Tapper. | ||
| So Tapper, you know, he's, this guy's a real scumbag, man. | ||
| These are just the scummiest people ever. | ||
| It's amazing how Jake Tapper can just change his story and change the narrative when it's time to sell a book. | ||
| Here's Jake Tapper covering up for the Biden crime family, and now that he's selling his book, There's no evidence to support the allegation my father was financially involved in my business because it did not happen. | ||
| There's no fairness or decency in what these Republicans are doing. | ||
| And I do have to say, whatever you think of Hunter Biden, and there's certainly a lot of people in this town, Democrats and Republicans, that do not think a lot of him. | ||
| There is a certain kind of, like, Cruelty to the campaign against him. | ||
| Where is Hunter? | ||
| Hunter was driving the decision making for the family in a way. | ||
| He was almost like a chief of staff of the family. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Does that strike you as pretty bizarre? | |
| It's bizarre because I think he is provably, demonstrably unethical, sleazy, and prone to horrible decisions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tell me how you really feel. | |
| Well, I mean, I just look at the record. | ||
| I mean, after his brother died, he cheated on his wife with his brother's widow and then got her addicted to crack. | ||
| That's just one thing I could say. | ||
| I don't have a lot of personal regard for him. | ||
| I can't help but wonder about the psychology of an individual like Jake Tapper, who goes on television every day, posing as a man with ethical standards, journalistic standards, and a fair reporter. | ||
| Of course, none of which are true. | ||
| How does he justify it in his own head? | ||
| What is the psychological process of somebody like a Jake Tapper? | ||
| Because he knows he's a total fraud, obviously. | ||
| He knows he lied for years about Joe Biden, and he knows now he's just grifting off of the lies that he told, writing a book, exposing himself as a liar. | ||
| What goes to a guy like that's head? | ||
| Is it just... | ||
| I'm just a complete scumbag liar and will do anything for money? | ||
| Is it, I really do not care if I lie and deceive people? | ||
| It doesn't matter to me? | ||
| What is it? | ||
| I'm serious. | ||
| Of course, he's going on this media tour right now. | ||
| Nobody's going to ask him that. | ||
| Nobody's going to ask him the real questions. | ||
| I guess Megyn Kelly kind of held him to task. | ||
| And he was walking around the... | ||
| Sirius XM Studios last week. | ||
| And, you know, he's not going to go on any conservative shows. | ||
| I'm surprised Megyn Kelly even got him on. | ||
| But he's got to promote a book. | ||
| So he knowingly lied for years about the Bidens and Hunter Biden and Joe Biden's health and everything. | ||
| And now he's writing the book, exposing his own lies. | ||
| Totally shameless, man. | ||
| Is it just he doesn't have a soul? | ||
| Is it that he just has no moral compass? | ||
| What is that? | ||
| What is that psychological? | ||
| What is that psychology of somebody that can be that big of a scumbag and just have no shame about it at all? | ||
| Just none. | ||
| Just none. | ||
| He'll lie to you about the Bidens for four years, and then he'll do a national book tour exposing his own lies. | ||
| Incredible stuff. | ||
| But there's more. | ||
| His partner there, Alex Thompson. | ||
| Oh, oh. | ||
| Guys, they had a fake White House that they were using. | ||
| Oh, no kidding! | ||
| No dip! | ||
| As if this is all breaking news. | ||
| And Tapper's book is like number two bestseller now, if you can believe that. | ||
| But by the way, they make you buy the book. | ||
| See, this is how they rig the numbers. | ||
| Corrupt Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor did the same thing. | ||
| They go on these tours, and they get these suckers to buy these books, and they say, oh, you can come to the event. | ||
| Or you can get an autographed copy, and then they basically make you buy two books just to get into the event. | ||
| And so they say, oh, wow, record book sales. | ||
| No, it's all a giant boondoggle. | ||
| So they're doing the same thing with Tapper's book. | ||
| But hey, oh, and they had a fake White House? | ||
| Oh yeah, here they are breaking that too, clip 19. And Alex, the fact of the fake town hall is not actually the worst part of the story that you report in the book. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| Other campaigns have used fake town halls. | ||
| Now, I would say those town halls usually are in addition to real town halls. | ||
| Joe Biden was doing neither. | ||
| This fake town hall was in order to film it so they could make it into campaign commercials. | ||
| They filmed it in Delaware with supporters. | ||
| But Joe Biden, at this point, this is the spring of 2024, Joe Biden's town hall, which was closed to press, was so bad that campaign officials determined that it was not usable. | ||
| For a campaign commercial. | ||
| So they took 90 minutes, two hours out of the president's day. | ||
| They filmed an entire town hall and they determined that it was not usable. | ||
| Now, some people say this was because Joe Biden was incoherent. | ||
| He could not really articulate his thoughts in a pithy or even semi-normal way. | ||
| Some people just said, like, the lighting was bad. | ||
| That was sort of the two points of view. | ||
| But the point is it shows how... | ||
| Like, what the campaign status was in the spring of 2024 when they were trying to, you know, deal with a candidate that was in decline. | ||
| Wait, someone told you the lighting was bad? | ||
| That's one of the excuses. | ||
| You're saying that they spent millions of dollars to stage a town hall? | ||
| Well, we didn't get the lighting right. | ||
| That was one of the excuses. | ||
| I mean, and this comes back to the question of how many people were aware of things like that but said nothing? | ||
| You know, we're here at Infowars considered tomorrow's news today. | ||
| Stuff Alex Jones was talking about 20 years ago is now mainstream. | ||
| So we're kind of used to that phenomenon. | ||
| It's like built into the culture here. | ||
| But this is a little different. | ||
| This is a little different. | ||
| This is the people that covered up the lies. | ||
| This is the people that demonized those reporting. | ||
| On what was really going on with Joe Biden. | ||
| And now they're the ones breaking the news. | ||
| Now they're the ones writing the books, doing the book tours, getting all the interviews. | ||
| I gotta say, it is really a strange thing to witness. | ||
| It's not like we talked about fluoride 20 years ago and now they're talking about it's a neurotoxin, let's remove it from the water. | ||
| This is like the people that Did the lying. | ||
| The people that did the cover-up are now doing a victory lap saying, look, we're reporting the truth now. | ||
| We're reporting on the cover-up. | ||
| It's like, what do you mean? | ||
| You were part of the cover-up. | ||
| You were on team cover-up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's what I'm saying. | |
| These are shameless scumbags. | ||
| But just to give it a little extra spice here, here's this absolutely shameless scumbag media reporter, Jake Tapper. | ||
| Just an absolute scumbag. | ||
| These people make me sick. | ||
| No shame. | ||
| And I guess that's what's so unrelatable at the end of the day, is just having no shame. | ||
| Just not caring. | ||
| Just being a complete and utter lying scumbag. | ||
| And just not caring that everybody knows it. | ||
| Just not caring that that's your reputation. | ||
| It's really an insult to your lineage. | ||
| It's an insult to your family. | ||
| You want to insult yourself, fine. | ||
| But, I mean, all of Jake Tapper's family, Should be disgusted with him. | ||
| All of his ancestors are probably looking down at him saying, you have brought shame on our family name. | ||
| You have brought shame on our family lineage. | ||
| You are a disgusting person. | ||
| But he has no shame. | ||
| He doesn't care. | ||
| Couldn't care less that his reputation publicly is a complete lying scumbag. | ||
| So here's just a little extra spice. | ||
| Here's just a little extra spice for that scumbag. | ||
| He has no shame. | ||
| Here he is promoting his book. | ||
| Which one is the clip? | ||
| You guys had it on the screen. | ||
| You got it. | ||
| Just go ahead and fire it. | ||
| Do we have it? | ||
| Maybe I don't see it on the list here, so maybe it got lost in translation. | ||
| There's just this clip. | ||
| It looked like you had it up on the screen a second ago, though. | ||
| It's just like a minute-long clip of him just talking about his book literally every single day. | ||
| And he's like, I'm breaking the news. | ||
| I'm breaking the news on the Biden cancer cover-up. | ||
| I'm breaking the news on how they had a fake White House. | ||
| I'm breaking the news. | ||
| Buy my book. | ||
| Every single day, this absolute shameless individual. | ||
| All right, I thought you had it on the screen. | ||
| Then that might have been from this. | ||
| So then even liberals are ripping on Jake Tapper now. | ||
| You know. | ||
| You know. | ||
| You are an absolute shameless scum of the earth when even liberals are making fun of you, Jake. | ||
| You are truly one of the worst of the worst, Jake. | ||
| As a human, I am embarrassed as a member of the media. | ||
| I am embarrassed as a talk show host. | ||
| I'm embarrassed as a man. | ||
| I'm embarrassed as an American. | ||
| I'm embarrassed as a human at your existence. | ||
| You embarrass us all. | ||
| You are a blight on humanity that we have such shameless scum like you, Jake. | ||
| But it's so bad. | ||
| You are now so bad that even liberals are making fun of you. | ||
| So here's Jon Stewart in clip 23. We're back with breaking news and our politics lead and a brand new excerpt from my upcoming book with Axios' Alex Thompson. | ||
| It's called Original Sin. | ||
| I'm not sure if you've heard of it. | ||
| It's on Biden's decline. | ||
| It's called Original Sin. | ||
| I'm sure you've heard on May 20th. | ||
| That's Tuesday. | ||
| Original Sin. | ||
| That's coming out in three weeks. | ||
| On May 20th. | ||
| That's just 19 days away. | ||
| In one week and one day. | ||
| Coming out in just a few days. | ||
| Comes out Tuesday. | ||
| You will not believe what we found out. | ||
| You know what? | ||
| Pause it real quick. | ||
| How do you even put this in perspective how I feel about Jake Tapper? | ||
| I have more respect for a street hooker than Jake Tapper. | ||
| I have mountains more respect for a stripper a prostitute a drug pusher a drug trafficker a pimp a whore I have an utmost more respect for them. | ||
| They have more integrity than you, Jake. | ||
| You're a political whore. | ||
| You're a political stripper. | ||
| You're a political prostitute. | ||
| You're a political hooker. | ||
| It's just disgusting. | ||
| So, Jon Stewart making fun of him. | ||
| Go ahead. | ||
| Don't news people. | ||
| Have to tell you what they know when they find it out? | ||
| Isn't that the difference between news and a secret? | ||
| You won't believe what we found out. | ||
| No, that's why I'm watching. | ||
| Breaking news in a week. | ||
| I don't know how the rest of the country is feeling about this book coming out, but I know New York is hyped! | ||
| How do you pivot from excitedly promoting your anchor's book to somberly and respectfully promoting your anchor's book? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Biden's health was very much in the news even before the cancer diagnosis was announced on Sunday. | |
| That's because of a new book by CNN's Jake Tapper. | ||
| this was already going to be a tough week and this makes it much harder. | ||
| And that is a reference to the fact that our colleague, Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson have a book that's set to publish on Tuesday. | ||
| This very tough news, this very challenging news, and at the same time the backdrop of our colleague Jake Tapper's book with Alex Thompson coming out this week. | ||
| It's so hard. | ||
| It's such a difficult time. | ||
| It's unfathomable in terms of the pain this family must be feeling. | ||
| And yet, if you act now, and you use the code backslash, tap that book, you will... | ||
| Obviously, this 20% off offer is not... | ||
| You actually framed this difficult news as perhaps even more of a reason to buy this book. | ||
| The timing of former President Joe Biden's cancer diagnosis is certainly dramatic, coming on the eve of a blockbuster new book about his health and his time in the White House. | ||
| Go on. | ||
| I'm sure some observers will say that the reporting in the book is even more important now. | ||
| Yet nobody's saying that. | ||
| No observers will say it's more important now. | ||
| Some observers might think, do these CNN people work on commission? | ||
| Like, why are they hawking this f***ing thing? | ||
| Is this a Girl Scout cookie situation? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoever sells the most Tapa books gets a Schwinn! | |
| Now, you know, Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert, they used to be funny, you know, 10, 15 years ago before Trump derangement syndrome took over. | ||
| That was a funny segment because it was based and rooted in truth. | ||
| But we're up against a break now. | ||
| And I think Jon Stewart does understand this, but obviously this is all a coordinated effort to cover up for the media's cover-up. | ||
| So it's pretty clear this is a coordinated effort here, pretending like they had no idea about the Biden health crisis, maybe trying to save their own integrity. | ||
| And then I would think kind of a side issue is distracting from the actual crimes. | ||
| Committed by Joe Biden and his family. | ||
| Oh, the poor cancer victim. | ||
| But to sit here and act like they didn't cover up his health issues. | ||
| To sit here and act like they didn't cover up how he wasn't running anything. | ||
| That's them trying to save face. | ||
| Like, oh no, see, we still have integrity. | ||
| We'll report on it now. | ||
| Oh! | ||
| Yeah! | ||
| It's kind of like, oh yeah, it's like, oh hey, take this vaccine. | ||
| It'll kill you deader than a hammer. | ||
| It'll give you turbo cancer. | ||
| It'll give you seizures. | ||
| Take this vaccine. | ||
| It's great. | ||
| And then four years after you've taken it, oh gee, that vaccine is bad. | ||
| Oh man, it's causing cancer and all this stuff. | ||
| It's like, no, you're sick. | ||
| It's the same thing they're doing now with the Biden cover-up. | ||
| And it's really... | ||
| It's hard to believe how they survived this, and they will. | ||
| You know, they've been corrupt for years. | ||
| Anybody that still believes them is not going to change their mind after this, I suppose. | ||
| And it's nice to see, you know, Jon Stewart. | ||
| I mean, at least he has enough integrity to call it what it is. | ||
| Just a total sham. | ||
| A total money grab. | ||
| A disgusting, shameless act from a lying scumbag like Jake Tapper and everybody else on the team involved in it. | ||
| But it really is, I mean, this should be, anybody involved in this cover-up, they should never be trusted again. | ||
| And now here they are saying, trust us. | ||
| See, we're reporting neutrally on the facts. | ||
| Doesn't matter if it's after any of our reporting will have any effect. | ||
| Doesn't matter. | ||
| See, we're telling you the truth. | ||
| And it's all clearly a coordinated effort. | ||
| So is it to save face of the media? | ||
| Is it to save face of the Biden crime family? | ||
| Is it a combination of both? | ||
| But it's clearly all coordinated with the timing lining up and everything else. | ||
| Clearly all coordinated. | ||
| So they would have attacked you for reporting it four years ago. | ||
| Now they're reporting it, claim they're breaking it, telling you buy our book, pay us for reporting this and trust us now. | ||
| So, I mean, look, as deranged as Jon Stewart has come down with Trump derangement syndrome, at least he has enough integrity to know not to touch that deal. | ||
| At least he's got that integrity. | ||
| By the way, you know, Comey, he's got his own book going on here. | ||
| He's doing book signings. | ||
| Jesse Waters, field reporter, decided to go. | ||
| Have a word with him at his recent book signing here in clip 22. Thank you for coming. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Great to meet you. | |
| Director Comey, how are you? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Jesse Waters from Fox has a question. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Why do you want an 86 Trump? | ||
| All right. | ||
| Director? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm not taking questions like that now. | |
| Why would you post that? | ||
| Director Comey, how was your interview with the Secret Service? | ||
| You want the book signed, really? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. | |
| Okay, you got it, bud. | ||
| Can you sign my seashell, too? | ||
| Which beach is this that you're going to? | ||
| You find a Kamala seashell, 8647. | ||
| This is a politically charged speech there. | ||
| I will be well. | ||
| Come on. | ||
| The seashell? | ||
| Who did it better, InfoWars or Fox? | ||
| Who do you guys think did it better? | ||
| Who confronted Comey better? | ||
| Who had more razzle-dazzle? | ||
| InfoWars or Fox? | ||
| I like Jesse Waters. | ||
| I like his team. | ||
| They do a good job. | ||
| I don't even think it's close. | ||
| I think Infowars takes the cake on the James Comey confrontation. | ||
| I don't even think it's close, actually. | ||
| We're not even in the same league, to be honest. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| That's not the point. | ||
| The point is that, finally, people are finally getting a little gumption, a little courage to confront these corrupt bastards destroying our country. | ||
| Alright, I'll tell you what. | ||
| Let's get an update here. | ||
| As we open the third hour, final hour of the Infowars War Room, let's go to the House Freedom Caucus on where they stand on this bill and the budget reconciliation talks happening right now. | ||
| Clip 21. I'll tell you what. | ||
| Guys, what do we think is going on with this? | ||
| All right, let's call an audible. | ||
| That's too choppy. | ||
| So we'll call an audible on that. | ||
| We can move on, no problem. | ||
| Well, we got Schumer complaining about it. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| How about Schumer complaining here in clip 28? | ||
| Ten years from now, because clean energy is the future. | ||
| It's cheaper and better. | ||
| It's going to hurt our country, our families, our children in so many ways. | ||
| This ideological obsession. | ||
| That the hard right led by the oil, gas and coal industry have against clean energy is going to be very harmful. | ||
| It's going to be one of the worst. | ||
| There are many. | ||
| One of the worst things that this administration is doing. | ||
| You're all going to die if you don't agree with us politically. | ||
| It's the Democrat standard. | ||
| The clean energy. | ||
| How's the clean energy working? | ||
| It hasn't, Chuck. | ||
| That's it. | ||
| It hasn't worked. | ||
| If it did, it'd work. | ||
| But it doesn't. | ||
| So it doesn't. | ||
| Oh, the big oil, the big gas lobbyists. | ||
| Or maybe it's just we want to have a sustainable energy source. | ||
| Maybe we just want to have cheap and sustainable energy that can power our country. | ||
| Maybe that's what it is, Chuck. | ||
| The wind ain't working, Chuck. | ||
| The solar ain't working, Chuck. | ||
| And it's also not green either. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everyone's going to die if you don't go with the Green New Gill. | |
| The Republicans are going to kill everybody because they want to use these energy sources. | ||
| Good Lord. | ||
| And it's amazing, too, because then they'll complain. | ||
| They'll complain about all the results of their own policies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, we're going to go to clean, green energy. | |
| Oh, wonderful. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Oh, my energy cost just went up 10 times. | ||
| And then they'll... | ||
| They'll blame someone else for that. | ||
| Yep. | ||
| Oh, boy. | ||
| Chuck Schumer just not sure he can be honest about anything at this point. | ||
| Seems to be the case there. | ||
| All right. | ||
| Let's look at some of these headlines now. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard slams politically motivated surveillance as effort to intimidate her following criticism of Harris and then support. | ||
| Supporting Trump. | ||
| You know, and that's the one thing that's amazing to me. | ||
| When I look at a Donald Trump, when I look at a Tulsi Gabbard, even an RFK Jr., I would say, Pete Hegseth. | ||
| I mean, these people have been relentlessly targeted, harassed, tormented, Trump the worst of it, but all of them have, by the radical left. | ||
| And so you'd think they'd have a little extra chip on their shoulder, a little extra motivation to get results. | ||
| They're not the corrupt ones. | ||
| They're the good guys. | ||
| So why not expose the people attacking you as the bad guys? | ||
| Let's get some results here. | ||
| You'd think there'd be an extra motivation factor there. | ||
| And yet, here we are. | ||
| And, you know, this kind of plays into it, and this clip is going massively viral now, and my guess is there'll be more clips like this, probably from Patel and Bongino. | ||
| And look, my stance on the issue hasn't necessarily changed. | ||
| Maybe my belief that we'll get any results might have changed. | ||
| But I've said it since the beginning. | ||
| The difference between my issues with Pam Bondi or any issues I may have with Patel and Bongino at the FBI, Bondi's playing with house money. | ||
| She was not even supposed to be there. | ||
| And you know she's got a gig at Fox News whenever she is relieved of her duty. | ||
| So there's really, you know, it's like there's no motivation for results. | ||
| She's already gotten caught lying to us multiple times. | ||
| Her desk is a black hole for anything that ends up on it. | ||
| So that to me is, yeah, F, 0%, no faith, no trust. | ||
| I want her gone immediately. | ||
| There's no ifs, ands, or buts in my mind about that. | ||
| And the only person that can redeem Pam Bondi is Pam Bondi. | ||
| But that's her. | ||
| With Patel and Bongino, they come into this with a lot to lose. | ||
| They come into this with their own reputation on the line. | ||
| And they come into this with a much different future outlook. | ||
| Meaning, how do they go back to their audience? | ||
| And Bongino, with a big audience, big audience on Rumble, that he's a stakeholder in, how does Dan Bongino go back to his audience without producing massive results? | ||
| So it's a little different for me. | ||
| Because where Pan Bondi is playing with house money, Bongino and Patel, they're playing with their own money. | ||
| They're gambling and playing with what they've already earned. | ||
| So it's a little different for me to give them a chance. | ||
| Since they have way more to lose. | ||
| And look, at the end of the day, if they produce results, then they'll be heroes. | ||
| If they produce nothing, then they'll be zeros. | ||
| So that's really the story for all three of them. | ||
| But my guess is, and look, I don't know why Bongino erased all of his archives off of Rumble when he became the FBI director. | ||
| I had people say, well, it's because of conflicts of interest with the FBI and some things he said. | ||
| And I was like, well, maybe it's because of things that he said in the past that now he doesn't want to be held accountable for. | ||
| But this clip is now going viral. | ||
| My guess is there's some with Patel as well, where they said one thing before about the FBI and before about Jeffrey Epstein, and now all of a sudden they're giving us a different story. | ||
| And so here's one example of that. | ||
| Yeah, 31, thank you. | ||
| Listen, that Jeffrey Epstein story is a big deal. | ||
| Please do not let that story go. | ||
| Keep your eye on this. | ||
| Catherine Rumler, we need to keep the heat on this case, folks. | ||
| There are a lot of people who are knee-deep in the Washington swamp who are not telling you the truth about serious allegations out there. | ||
| That Epstein may have had video and audio of people out there doing things they shouldn't have been doing. | ||
| And you should be asking yourself the question, how is it that all these people, the CIA director, the Obama fixer, Bill Clinton, all intersected past with Jeffrey Epstein? | ||
| Jeffrey Epstein isn't with us anymore, and nobody seems to want to talk about it. | ||
| Outside of a few entrepreneurial media outlets saying, hey, this is a big deal. | ||
| He killed himself. | ||
| Again, you want me to? | ||
| I've seen the whole file. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He killed himself. | |
| All right. | ||
| Now look, let me try to do full spectrum analysis of all of this. | ||
| I understand you have to have a different tact and approach when you're officially with the FBI than when you're a talk show host. | ||
| I get that. | ||
| However, the concept, the idea is that The standards have been the problem. | ||
| The idea is that the approach, the standards, and everything that's going on at the FBI has been the problem. | ||
| And that's why Bongino and Patel have both, in the past, suggested to just gut the whole thing. | ||
| Just get rid of the FBI altogether. | ||
| But to now just come out and say, oh, I've read the file, he've killed himself. | ||
| Yeah, people are obviously not taking that very well. | ||
| And you can't blame them. | ||
| And nobody's going to believe it. | ||
| And he's since basically issued another statement saying, hey, what do you want me to do? | ||
| I'm just reading the file. | ||
| Well, Dan, now you just sound like every other FBI agent that's lied to us in the past. | ||
| That's the problem. | ||
| That's why people are upset. | ||
| If you would have gone on and said, the file says Epstein killed himself, and I have no other thing to report to you other than what the file says, And if you really wanted to keep people intrigued, you'd say, I don't believe he killed himself, or there's evidence suggesting that he was killed, which of course there is. | ||
| There's more evidence suggesting that he was killed than that he killed himself, actually. | ||
| But now you just sound like every FBI in the past. | ||
| So now we've kind of crossed this threshold where Patel and Bongino... | ||
| It's turning into meet the new boss, same as the old boss. | ||
| And this is only going to get worse for them. | ||
| Now again, the criticism and the approach I have towards Bondi versus Patel and Bongino is different. | ||
| I've explained why. | ||
| And at the end of the day, it's going to be up to them whether they want to be seen as heroes or zeros. | ||
| But the longer this goes on and the more it feels like meet the new FBI, same as the old FBI, people are going to start getting Really impatient and really skeptical. | ||
| And that's going to really hurt the entire MAGA movement and you just hate to see it. | ||
| Especially if you would have said a year ago that Patel and Bongino would be leading the FBI, you'd say that's about as good as it gets. | ||
| And now here we are with what would have been top prospects to lead the FBI and we're saying, oh great, meet the new FBI, same as the old FBI. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| It's not good. | ||
| It's rubbing people the wrong way. | ||
| And, you know, they keep talking about, oh, things are going on behind the scenes. | ||
| Things are going on behind the scenes. | ||
| Things are going on behind the scenes. | ||
| Hey, that's fine. | ||
| And if that's true and it gets results, more power to you. | ||
| I will celebrate and we'll give the due praise when it's due. | ||
| But you know what the problem with this is? | ||
| We heard the exact same thing in the first administration, didn't we? | ||
| We heard the exact same. | ||
| Tick-tock. | ||
| Tick-tock. | ||
| And then tick-tock, the clock ran out. | ||
| And no deep state arrests. | ||
| No draining the swamp. | ||
| They stole an election. | ||
| And now here we are. | ||
| Getting the same song and dance. | ||
| So I'm not willing to go all in. | ||
| F scorched earth with Bongino and Patel yet. | ||
| I know others are and can't blame them. | ||
| Like I am with Bondi. | ||
| But this TikTok game ain't gonna last. | ||
| It ain't gonna last. | ||
| And this, you know, things are going on behind the scenes and all I've got the files. | ||
| This ain't working. | ||
| And I will tell you right now, this isn't... | ||
| Again, this isn't about my reputation. | ||
| But I'm just telling you right now, the longer this goes on, and the longer we feel it's the same song and dance with Patel and Bongino as we did with Ray or Comey or anybody else. | ||
| I mean, Bongino was very critical of Ray, who was the FBI director when Epstein didn't kill himself. | ||
| Ray. | ||
| Now he sounds exactly like Ray. | ||
| What the hell's going on? | ||
| That's not good. | ||
| That's not progress. | ||
| That's regress. | ||
| So, it's not even about, oh, let me give advice to Patel and Bongino. | ||
| They're going to do whatever it is they're going to do. | ||
| They've already made up their minds. | ||
| So if they're really going to get results, then they're going to get results. | ||
| If they're not going to get results and it's just going to be the same song and dance, then that's already what's going to happen. | ||
| But I think it's pretty clear now where this is going. | ||
| The TikTok game isn't going to last. | ||
| The trust us game isn't going to last. | ||
| The I've reviewed the files, Epstein killed himself, isn't going to last. | ||
| None of this is going to work for us. | ||
| None of this is going to work for MAGA. | ||
| And really, this is going to be a major, I think, media to bureaucracy case study, which could go bad. | ||
| Because it's like, you know. | ||
| I don't have any desire to get involved in the government of their bureaucracy. | ||
| But now it's like, hey, where people might trust somebody in the media that tells them the truth, like a Bongino, and then you say, okay, here's the reins, what can you do? | ||
| And you do nothing. | ||
| Well, then, you're never going to have that again. | ||
| And it's just going to be bureaucracy after bureaucracy after bureaucracy, and nothing will ever change. | ||
| And nothing will ever change. | ||
| Now, you can say it's still early in the game, and that's a fine counterpoint. | ||
| But I'm already seeing where this is going, and it is not rubbing people the right way. | ||
| We've already done this. | ||
| We already went through four years of this. | ||
| We played the same game with multiple attorney generals. | ||
| We played the same game with the FBI in the first Trump administration. | ||
| Indictments are coming. | ||
| Indictments are coming. | ||
| Tick-tock. | ||
| Tick-tock. | ||
| And then we got nothing. | ||
| Fool me. | ||
| Fool us once. | ||
| Shame on you. | ||
| Fool us twice? | ||
| Shame on us. | ||
| Well, we're not going to be shamed. | ||
| We're not going to be shamed. | ||
| So I don't know if it's a public pressure campaign. | ||
| I mean, I don't think Patel and Bongino are dumb. | ||
| I'd say they're probably pretty smart. | ||
| They're obviously successful. | ||
| So they have to see this. | ||
| I mean, they have to see where this is going. | ||
| Sure, they're busy, but they're on social media. | ||
| Patel actually has quite a vibrant social life, too. | ||
| So they have to see where this is going. | ||
| And people are losing faith and confidence and trust fast. | ||
| Really fast. | ||
| And then you come out and say, oh, Epstein killed himself. | ||
| I've seen the file. | ||
| Hmm. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Now people got a major problem. | ||
| Now they got a problem, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| But the TikTok game ain't going to work. | ||
| Here's a perfect example. | ||
| This came from xaccountc3. | ||
| There should be at least 10 special counsels right now. | ||
| The Autopen special counsel, Russiagate special counsel, the Lawfare against Trump special counsel. | ||
| Like, oh, Mar-a-Lago's worth $20 million. | ||
| There's probably a toilet at Mar-a-Lago worth $20 million. | ||
| BLM Antifa Riot Special Counsel COVID-2020 Scandemic Special Counsel January 6th Special Counsel Butler Mar-a-Lago Assassination Attempt Special Counsel Hunter Biden Laptop Special Counsel Doge Waste Fraud and Abuse Special Counsel Ukraine Fake Impeachment of Trump Special Counsel Afghanistan Withdrawal Special Counsel Now actually, | ||
| on that note Pete Hegseth has released a statement on the Afghanistan withdrawal. | ||
| I'll read from that. | ||
| But see, that's what I'm saying. | ||
| Nobody's seeing any action. | ||
| Nobody's seeing any results. | ||
| And then you get the big TV interview with Maria Barcheromo, who gets some of the most viral interviews. | ||
| And you got Bongino and Patel up there. | ||
| And it's like, okay, here's your chance to deliver something. | ||
| If nothing else, hope. | ||
| And instead, you stomped on the hope and squished your foot down on it like a bug. | ||
| None of these special counsels, but we know Patel and Bongino know all this stuff was corrupt. | ||
| They talked about it for years. | ||
| And now they're in there and... | ||
| But we'll see. | ||
| Now, Hegseth released this statement, so at least somebody's looking in to the Afghanistan withdrawal. | ||
| Hegseth. | ||
| Secretary of Defense, on August 26, 2021, President Biden's administration led a chaotic withdrawal of U.S. military and embassy officials from Afghanistan that led to the deaths of 13 U.S. service members and 170 civilians in a suicide bombing at the Kabul International Airport, Abbey Gate. | ||
| President Trump and I have formally pledged full transparency for what transpired during our military withdrawal from Afghanistan. | ||
| The Department of Defense has an obligation. | ||
| Both to the American people and the warfighters who sacrificed their youth in Afghanistan to get the facts. | ||
| This remains an important step towards regaining faith and trust with the American people and all those who wear the uniform and it's prudent based on the number of casualties and equipment lost during the execution of this withdrawal operation. | ||
| Over the last three months, the department has been engaged in a review of this catastrophic event. | ||
| I've concluded that we need to conduct a comprehensive review to ensure that accountability for this event is met and that the complete picture is provided to the American people. | ||
| To meet this imperative, I'm directing the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs and Senior Advisor Sean Parnell to convene a special review panel Well, | ||
| that's how it's done. | ||
| Thank you, Pete Hegseth. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
| You know, here's what's so wild. | ||
| About it now, too. | ||
| As we get an even better understanding of how little say in anything Joe Biden actually had. | ||
| Joe Biden was the president in name only. | ||
| So, who really made the call for the Afghanistan withdrawal? | ||
| It wasn't Joe Biden. | ||
| Now, maybe he had the idea or agreed with an idea, but then who really ran it? | ||
| Because when you look at the results, and Hegseth, I mean, he pretty much hits all the bullet points there. | ||
| And I think this was all about trying to make up for four years of the Trump administration stopping all of the money and weapons laundering to these proxy groups, which since after Biden got in, we saw what happened in Ukraine. | ||
| Most of that money went missing. | ||
| Most of those weapons went missing. | ||
| Afghanistan withdrawal, all those weapons and everything, all that got turned over to these proxy armies and terrorist groups. | ||
| And then you see the fall of Syria. | ||
| And then you see the attack on Israel. | ||
| So it was all part of the same thing. | ||
| And this has all been coming out of D.C. and the CIA and other intelligence groups that run these proxy groups for destabilization and regime change efforts. | ||
| And Trump just stopped it. | ||
| Trump just put a red light to it. | ||
| So they had to make up for those four years. | ||
| And that's why they did all the laundering in Ukraine. | ||
| And that's why they did the Afghanistan withdrawal, in my measurement. | ||
| But see, now you had the opportunity to find out who was really orchestrating it. | ||
| Oh, I don't know. | ||
| Maybe Jake Tapper will write a book about it. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Maybe it'll be Jake Tapper that can tell us the truth about that. | ||
| Might be the only hope we have. | ||
| Huh? | ||
| Maybe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. | |
| We're heading into the last segment here shortly. | ||
| We want to thank our VIP members at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| To learn more and become a member, go to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. | ||
| VIP membership benefits are included, but not limited to monthly membership credits, bonus entries into our raffle giveaways, access to the lost Alex Jones tapes. | ||
| These are censored broadcasts from years ago, and more. | ||
| Learn more and find out the benefits of becoming a VIP club member. | ||
| At thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP, you say, what raffles? | ||
| What giveaways? | ||
| Well, when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, we have raffles and giveaways that feature very unique, cool, awesome, amazing vehicles. | ||
| The most recent, which is concluded now, was the Alex Jones Cybertruck. | ||
| Right now, though, when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, you will get multiple entries for the... | ||
| Ford Raptor. | ||
| 2025 Ford Raptor truck. | ||
| So you get multiple entries when you shop at thealexjonesstore.com, but when you are a VIP member, you get bonus entries, obviously increasing your chances to win. | ||
| So just one of the benefits for the VIP membership. | ||
| We really appreciate the VIPs. | ||
| It's that sustained membership that budgets us into the future, and we really appreciate that. | ||
| So we appreciate everybody shopping at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| We appreciate the VIP members sustaining us and budgeting us into the future. | ||
| And as long as we have your support there, we'll continue to stay on air. | ||
| All right, final segment coming up. | ||
| We'll see how much we can squeeze in here. | ||
| It'll be like Jerry Nadler trying to squeeze into a pair of pants. | ||
| It's difficult. | ||
| It's a challenge. | ||
| But somehow, someway, he does it every day. | ||
| And thank God. | ||
| Yeah, that Democrat that was trying to beat up... | ||
| ICE law enforcement officials got caught on camera whining and complaining she's the victim now. | ||
| She's doing the TV media rounds. | ||
| Her first digital court appearance just happened, by the way. | ||
| Old LaMonica McIver over there. | ||
| She goes on television. | ||
| And, you know, she doesn't like that she's being charged here. | ||
| She has this to say about Elena Haba. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In clip 29. We've done it before, and so we had no idea that it would spiral out of this. | |
| So I just think there are so many other important things for Elena to be focused on that she should be focused on rather than trying to stop, you know, Congress members for doing their job. | ||
| No question about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Lots happening in every state. | |
| You said this morning that... | ||
| So let me address two things quickly. | ||
| She says, we didn't expect this. | ||
| We didn't anticipate this. | ||
| What an absolute liar you are. | ||
| This is exactly what you expected. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was the entire purpose of why you did it. | |
| You went there to create a spectacle. | ||
| You went there to create a scene. | ||
| So, okay, nobody's buying that BS. | ||
| But then she says, well, don't, you know, they have more important things to worry about. | ||
| Is that true? | ||
| More important things to worry about. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
| What could she possibly be talking about? | ||
| I'm wondering. | ||
| Democrat representative says the judicial system has more important things to worry about than her assaulting law enforcement. | ||
| What kind of things could she be talking about? | ||
| Crime rates in our cities? | ||
| Caused by Democrats. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
| Poverty rates in our cities? | ||
| Caused by Democrats. | ||
| Deranged homeless drug addicts roaming the streets caused by Democrats. | ||
| Deporting illegal alien criminal violent gang members brought in by Democrats. | ||
| Focusing on the Biden cancer, dementia, crime family cover-up run by Democrats. | ||
| The attempted assassination of Donald Trump promoted by Democrats. | ||
| The attack on law enforcement across the country caused by Democrats. | ||
| Am I missing anything here, guys? | ||
| She says there are other more important things to be focused on. | ||
| And she might be right. | ||
| But isn't it funny? | ||
| I would like to know what exactly she's talking about because I guarantee you these issues she's talking about are all caused by Democrats. | ||
| Every single one of them. | ||
| What are even the issues they claim are caused by Republicans? | ||
| What are even the issues? | ||
| Deporting illegal aliens? | ||
| Oh no! | ||
| Lowering drug prices? | ||
| Lowering energy prices? | ||
| Lowering gas prices? | ||
| Oh no! | ||
| Trying to fix our failing healthcare system? | ||
| Trying to fix our failing education system? | ||
| Geez, oh my gosh, wow, these Republicans. | ||
| It's not some endorsement of the Republican Party. | ||
| It's just like, let's just be fair neutral observers here. | ||
| Oh boy, oh boy. | ||
| Okay, I'll tell you what. | ||
| Let's see some craziness. | ||
| Why not? | ||
| Why not see some craziness, huh? | ||
| Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy. | ||
| You go to church and you see this in clip three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What a gift to be here for who we are, this queering of the church. | |
| And now I'd like to invite Gwen forward to read our open and affirming statement. | ||
| Oh, opening and affirming. | ||
| Great. | ||
| Affirming how queer we are. | ||
| And it's a dude. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As an open and affirming congregation, CUCC welcomes all individuals, lesbian, gay, bisexual, heterosexual, queer questioning. | |
| Why are you always talking about your sex? | ||
| What is with you? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You never find any of these people at a church until they took it over. | |
| Get access to kids. | ||
| Your new priest class. | ||
| Your new priest-rapist class. | ||
| Your new priest-pedophile class. | ||
| A bunch of leftist trans people. | ||
| You ever going back to that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Church? | |
| We're here to celebrate the queering of the church. | ||
| Really, that's funny. | ||
| I didn't hear you mention Jesus Christ. | ||
| Didn't hear you mention God. | ||
| Didn't quote any Bible verses, but you sure as hell let me know you like to stick your dinghy in, you know, holes they don't belong in. | ||
| Thank you for that. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| You take your kid to school. | ||
| And the teacher says this in clip four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, for those of you who don't know me, I'm a high school math teacher and I have a pride flag in my classroom. | |
| My job is to teach students math. | ||
| But it's significantly more than just that. | ||
| Some of the students that I teach might not have liked their previous math teachers. | ||
| Might not know how to learn math. | ||
| May have never even passed a math class before. | ||
| So, so much of my job is building an atmosphere and a persona that the students feel comfortable learning from me. | ||
| Because with everyone, especially high school students, learning is scary. | ||
| Failure is tough and failure is required to learn. | ||
| I'm asking my students to be vulnerable with their failures and in order for them to be vulnerable, they have to feel safe. | ||
| The pride flag is one of the many ways that I show my kids, regardless of who they are, that you are safe in my class. | ||
| No, there's nothing to do with that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No matter who you are, who you love, where you come from, you're welcome here. | |
| It has nothing to do with math either. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think that makes sense. | |
| Do you? | ||
| Well, that's because you're retarded. | ||
| And you don't belong in a classroom. | ||
| There should probably be a restraining order keeping you away from any minors. | ||
| And I think a mental institution is where you need to be checked in immediately. | ||
| You wonder why our education system is failing? | ||
| I teach math, but it's more important to make sure the kids know I'm gay. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And queer. | |
| And trans. | ||
| Yeah, what are you doing after you meet your kid's teacher? | ||
| Transferring schools? | ||
| Right. | ||
| Alright, so you took your family to church. | ||
| It was queer. | ||
| You never went back. | ||
| You took your kid to class. | ||
| Teacher's fat gay retard. | ||
| Gonna transfer schools. | ||
| So where can we go? | ||
| Let's try the park. | ||
| The National Park. | ||
| Certainly we're safe here, kids, family. | ||
| Let's go to the National Park. | ||
| You take your kids there and you find this clip 26. Some carry hate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We carry the largest trans pride flag to ever be flown in a national park and unfurled it on the side of El Cap to prove a point. | |
| That trans is natural. | ||
| The Trump administration and transphobes would love to have you believe that being trans is unnatural. | ||
| But species that can transition sexes can be found on every continent and in every ocean on planet Earth. | ||
| So call it a protest. | ||
| Call it a celebration. | ||
| We are bringing elevation to liberation. | ||
| They don't need surgery or pills. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They try to erase us from government websites and education systems and libraries. | |
| So we raise this flag higher than ever before so every trans person knows that they have people that love them in their corner. | ||
| The people united will never be defeated. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| This is nuts. | ||
| So liberals have made the classroom unsafe? | ||
| They've made the church unsafe, and now you can't even go to a national park without some radical leftist letting you know how gay they are. | ||
| My God, is anywhere safe? | ||
| Is there anywhere we can go without these retard liberals bastardizing and destroying everything that is good created by God that they reject? | ||
| Certainly there has to be somewhere. | ||
| Well, there was an event at the White House. | ||
| Seems like you're probably good at the White House. | ||
| By the way, you know, here's a point, too. | ||
| You know, Scott Besant is a gay man. | ||
| Did you know that? | ||
| Do you care? | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| See, and that's the difference. | ||
| Scott Besant doesn't go around. | ||
| He does tons of TV interviews. | ||
| How often does he mention how gay he is? | ||
| How often does he talk about his husband or maybe he's married? | ||
| I don't even know. | ||
| How often does he talk about the pride flag and the trans flag and LGBT? | ||
| Not even one time. | ||
| He doesn't mention it one time. | ||
| He doesn't make a case about it. | ||
| Conservative media doesn't make a case about it. | ||
| We don't care. | ||
| Do you do a good job? | ||
| Great. | ||
| But notice, too, the liberal media. | ||
| The first gay treasury secretary. | ||
| Not mentioned once! | ||
| If he was a Democrat, he'd be all over. | ||
| They'd be celebrating how great it is. | ||
| We have a gay treasury secretary. | ||
| My God! | ||
| But no, since she's working for Trump and he's not a radical leftist, then it's just, you know, we don't talk about it. | ||
| But of course, we don't want to talk about it anyway because we don't care. | ||
| See, you can't even be a liberal teacher without having to tell your kids how gay you are. | ||
| You can't even be a priest, a fake priest, pastor, whatever these leftists are, without telling the congregation how gay you are. | ||
| You can't even work at a national park without letting everybody know. | ||
| I mean, this might be the worst of it all. | ||
| I mean, you know, indoctrinating the kids sexually, you're a pervert, maybe a pedophile. | ||
| Destroying the church with your leftist ideology, you go to a different church. | ||
| But to destroy God's beautiful creation, earth, a forest, a park? | ||
| One of the last places you can go and just escape from this wild world? | ||
| No, they have to destroy that too. | ||
| They have to just destroy everything. | ||
| And this is like, oh, well, you know, we don't want to make a federal case because everybody's gay. | ||
| It's like, here comes Pete Booty Judge. | ||
| He's gay! | ||
| He's gay! | ||
| Hey, what do you think about this bridge? | ||
| I don't know, but he's gay! | ||
| What qualifications does Pete Booty Judge have? | ||
| To be the transportation secretary. | ||
| Well, you know, he likes to suck penis. | ||
| He likes anal sex. | ||
| He's gay. | ||
| It's like, you can't hear it enough. | ||
| Gay, gay, gay, gay! | ||
| And then here's Besant, who's polished, smart, good at his job. | ||
| And nobody talks about it because we don't care. | ||
| But here comes Pete Booty Juge with his fake breasts. | ||
| He feeds the son that he bought. | ||
| Anyway. | ||
| Well, you can go to the White House. | ||
| So they had this dinner. | ||
| And I guess this is the last place you can go. | ||
| And they had a nice presentation. | ||
| This is beauty. | ||
| This is the golden age. | ||
| This is what we need to be striving for. | ||
| Now, there's something else that I noticed about this video. | ||
| But this is what happens now at the White House. | ||
| This is the one place you can go now with Trump at the White House where you're going to get elegance, where you're going to get beauty, where you're going to get class. | ||
| And so this is what it's like. | ||
| You go to dinner at the White House. | ||
| This is your entertainment. | ||
| You don't have trans people dancing around half-naked. | ||
| You don't have gay people frolicking around with gay flags and trans, you know, all the other crap that they do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, you get a nice, classy, elegant presentation like this in clip 27. You | |
| know, one other observation I saw, or I had from watching this video, it actually kind of upset me. | ||
| You notice how there were a lot of stiffs in that room that didn't seem to enjoy that, and it was like they couldn't wait for it to be over? | ||
| That was bizarre to me. | ||
| You could tell there were people that enjoyed it and appreciated it, and then there were a bunch of stiffs that were like annoyed by it. | ||
| That's sad, actually. | ||
| That's like a sign that you've lost your humanity. | ||
| But it's like at least have the class to pretend like you're enjoying this presentation, which is just beautiful. | ||
| But that was strange to see so many stiffs in there like, ugh. | ||
| You got to enjoy these things, folks. | ||
| You got to enjoy stuff like that. | ||
| It's very rare that you have just organic human art like that. | ||
| Okay, well, then you have that, whatever that is. | ||
| Yeah, nice compare and contrast there. | ||
| That's exactly it. | ||
| That's exactly it right there. | ||
| And that's a fair left versus right. | ||
| And I know people are, oh, the left versus right paradigm is fake and all that. | ||
| And that's fine. | ||
| There's fairness to that. | ||
| But it is also real at the same time. | ||
| It's like there is a left-right paradigm. | ||
| It's like, yeah, there's a uniparty. | ||
| And yeah, the left-right paradigm kind of distracts us from the up-down paradigm of freedom versus slavery. | ||
| But there also is a left-right paradigm. | ||
| I mean, that's the left. | ||
| And then that's the right. | ||
| Boy, oh boy. | ||
| But I'll tell you what. | ||
| Let's buffer it with just something a little enjoyable. | ||
| And I'm going to hit some of these headlines. | ||
| Just for your enjoyment here. | ||
| Never forget what the left went through in November. | ||
| Never forget they truly believe their own lies. | ||
| Never forget how they got set up. | ||
| To be completely crushed by liars like Jake Tapper. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen to this woman on election night who really believed that Trump was going to lose in clip 25. Okay, so we're closing in on almost 5 p.m. Eastern Time, and I've been tracking everything that's been going on across the country today. | |
| Sure you have. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And my most important encounter was when I went out to get my champagne. | |
| Yeah, you're tracking things around the country while getting champagne. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was talking to the guy in the store, of course, asking him, did he vote? | |
| And he said he did early voting, and he asked me if I early voted. | ||
| And he asked me, you know, Why I was getting the champagne. | ||
| And I said, because I'm going to be toasting Madam President tonight. | ||
| And he just looked at me with kind of like a smirk on his face. | ||
| And I said, you know, she's going to win this, right? | ||
| And he says, oh, well, it's very, very close. | ||
| And I said, no, it's not. | ||
| He says, well, what do you mean? | ||
| I said, no, it's not. | ||
| The women of America are making their voices heard. | ||
| Reproductive rights is what it all comes down to. | ||
| And women are voting in numbers relative to men. | ||
| That are unbelievable. | ||
| She's won this. | ||
| And I said to him, she's going to take every one of the swing states plus Iowa. | ||
| Oh, is she? | ||
|
unidentified
|
And he said, oh, but the numbers are so close. | |
| I said, I'm a political analyst. | ||
| Oh, yeah, you are. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The numbers are there. | |
| She's taking this election. | ||
| And I said to him, you realize, and he didn't tell me who he voted for, but of course I knew. | ||
| And I said, you do realize you wasted your vote, right? | ||
| Yes, we're all laughing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I didn't care. | |
| We're all having fun. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I walked out with my bottle of champagne and happily walked home. | |
| And I'm sure you drank that whole bottle, too. | ||
| You might have had to go back for more. | ||
| All right, just a little buffer there. | ||
| Just a little bit of a buffer. | ||
| Let's hit some of these headlines, shall we? | ||
| AOC is seen as the face of the Democrat Party, and it's not even close. | ||
| Now, remember, it was about a month ago they came out with a poll, and she was... | ||
| She was voted as the leader of the Democrat Party, but it was a smaller margin. | ||
| Now it's an even wider margin. | ||
| I don't say this facetiously. | ||
| I'm actually glad because, I mean, beyond just the fact I don't think she could win a national election anyway, she might even struggle to beat Chuck Schumer if she makes that move. | ||
| And it won't even matter. | ||
| Bernie Sanders can hand over all of her, all of his political capital to her, and she'll defeat the Democrats. | ||
| But she couldn't win a national election. | ||
| I like it more because, you know, Vance is now the frontrunner. | ||
| It's all too early, really, for 2028, but just looking at it, Vance is seen as the frontrunner on the Republican side. | ||
| Now, I don't know if you could say AOC is the frontrunner, but they view her as the face of the Democrat Party now. | ||
| And to me, that's just something long overdue, and it's time to transfer political power to a new generation. | ||
| This current generation has not done very well with their political power. | ||
| Not that I would want AOC to have it anyway, but at least it would help usher in the new younger generations of getting political. | ||
| Democrats throw money at the problem. | ||
| The gaining support and clout that Trump and conservatives are gaining online. | ||
| Now, it's funny, in this New York Times story, they're using the example of this individual. | ||
| You may have recognized this name. | ||
| Brian Tyler Cohen. | ||
| Now, you may recognize that name. | ||
| You may not. | ||
| Now, if I said, no lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, then you may recognize it. | ||
| This guy, who's the profile here, the Democrats are throwing money at these people, which again, so the irony is they're admitting that all this Democrat support you see on social media is bought and paid for, but this guy is hilarious that they profile him. | ||
| He used to be called No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, and then he got caught in so many blatant lies that he erased No Lie from his online moniker. | ||
| So on brand for the Democrats. | ||
| I mean, just right up their alley. | ||
| I love it. | ||
| Personally. | ||
| I'm a big fan. | ||
| So go for it. | ||
| Promote No Lie with Brian Tyler Cohen, who removed No Lie from his name because he's such a known liar now. | ||
| Great branding. | ||
| Excellent stuff. | ||
| Meanwhile, here, let's hit this geopolitical news. | ||
| Goodwill running out as UK, France, and Canada demand Israel and Gaza offensive. | ||
| So all three of these nations have been critical of Israel, but now they're being extra critical because Israel is blocking aid going into Gaza. | ||
| And that whole thing is actually really strange because there is mounting pressure. | ||
| And they have been denying aid. | ||
| And then Netanyahu is like, okay, well, we'll give them some aid. | ||
| We'll give them something. | ||
| It's really strange. | ||
| And look, call it a war, whatever, I wouldn't even make such a big fuss about it other than maybe for humanitarian reasons except that U.S. political influence and major money and support is being poured in there. | ||
| But yeah, I mean, Israel is basically, you know, starving these people out. | ||
| So these other countries have a problem with it. | ||
| And then what is Israel saying to these countries? | ||
| Well, you're anti-Semitic. | ||
| Of course you are. | ||
| So if you don't want Israel starving out the Palestinians, you're anti-Semitic. | ||
| So if you don't like Israel killing 100,000 people, you're an anti-Semite. | ||
| That's the logic here. | ||
| And then, you know, people are surprised that there's so much building hatred and animosity towards Israel. | ||
| With this formula, what do you expect? | ||
| You're killing tens of thousands of people, women and children. | ||
| Then you're denying the people that are remaining any aid. | ||
| And then anybody that dares say anything about it, you call them an anti-Semite, you deport them, you take their scholarships, you deny them their diploma, you censor them off the internet, you shut down their bank accounts. | ||
| Golly gee. | ||
| How that's not a formula to be liked, I don't know. | ||
| Now, this is actually pretty significant here. | ||
| New intelligence suggests Israel is preparing possible strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, according to U.S. officials. | ||
| Now, let me tell you what people are missing about this. | ||
| If this is true, which we have to doubt everything, but if this is true, what this means to me... | ||
| Is that you have Israeli intelligence assets or even people directly working with Netanyahu feeding information to the White House against Netanyahu. | ||
| I'm telling you, I think people are turning on Netanyahu everywhere. | ||
| And I'm talking about just inside Israel. | ||
| He's already losing support of the Israelis. | ||
| Even a lot of Jews that supported him now are like, this is getting a little bad. | ||
| What I suspect here is that you either have Israel intelligence, which we know is everywhere, or somebody who works directly with Netanyahu feeding intel to the Trump White House saying, hey, they're looking to bomb Iran even after you stood against it. | ||
| And this obviously is a deterrent. | ||
| To that happening. | ||
| Now, this could all be fear-mongering that goes on between these two countries at the same time. | ||
| But I'm saying, if this is true, this tells me people are turning on Netanyahu fast, including the people that are surrounding him. | ||
| And all he has now is to just destroy Gaza entirely and take the land, which he's failed at so far. | ||
| So... | ||
| I don't think Netanyahu is in a very good situation politically right now. | ||
| But he's so committed to this legacy he wants to build for himself of expanding Israel and taking the Gaza Strip and defeating Hamas that he's just not going to stop. | ||
| He's gone completely crazy. | ||
| I think Netanyahu is probably the most psychotic person on the planet right now. | ||
| And he just can't back off. | ||
| And the people in Israel are turning against him. | ||
| People in America have turned against him. | ||
| And now I would suggest that either Israeli intelligence or people that work with him are turning against him, sending intel to the Trump administration like, hey, he's getting ready to bomb these nuclear sites. | ||
| That's what it looks like to me. | ||
| That does it for the Infowars War Room. | ||
| We take a 21-hour break. | ||
| We'll do it all again tomorrow. | ||
| Quite frankly, I didn't develop... | ||
| Optimal Human, when Bigly came on as a big sponsor, and I told them the supplements I wanted from the companies I wanted. | ||
| They went out and did what I wanted. | ||
| People love them, and they're incredible. | ||
| The turmeric, the Shilogy, the Irish Seamoss, all of it. | ||
| But they'd had this out for years, and I thought, my green caps are great, and this other company I use is great because your green superfoods are amazing. | ||
| And then I finally took it, and Harrison Smith took it, and I was like, my God. | ||
| And by then, we'd been selling it four or five months, and it was already a top seller. | ||
| The problem is there's so many ingredients, and it's so hard to source, and it's so clean, high standards, that it's sold out most of the time. | ||
| We finally got a decent shipment of it in, but we never offered it for a subscription. | ||
| Because we just couldn't keep it. | ||
| When you subscribe at TheAlexShowStore.com and then they keep it back for you so it never sells out. | ||
| So go to TheAlexShowStore.com and get your Optimal Human and so many other incredible products today. | ||
| Check out all the great Patriot apparel. | ||
| Make your life more healthy and enriched and help keep us on the air as we take on the deep state at Point Lake Range and win. | ||
| We have the bad guys and it's all part of the same constellation. | ||
| This whole system. | ||
| They don't want World War III to stop. | ||
| They don't want all these agendas to stop. | ||
| Turning us into commodities. | ||
| Turning us into guinea pigs. | ||
| They want our bodies. | ||
| They want our children. | ||
| They stole Elon Musk's son. | ||
| You have to understand, it's all part of the same project. | ||
| All part of training the general public to accept this evil. | ||
| Well, we're not accepting it. | ||
| We're standing up. | ||
| They fear our children. | ||
| They fear the future. | ||
| That's why they're targeting. | ||
| This broadcast is standing up for all of our collective futures. | ||
| And when you support us, when you share the reports, you are changing the world. | ||
| You have all the power. | ||
| So share the live feed right now. | ||
| Real Alex Jones on X. CIA mind control sex slave survivor. | ||
| Kathy O 'Brien is on air exposing the Jeffrey Epstein operation and beyond. | ||
| We need to put that out on X right now. | ||
| People need to understand. | ||
| You need to share this live feed. | ||
| You need to take this interview once we archive it today. | ||
| Understand, as early as next week, Bandout Video's gone. | ||
| Infowars is gone. | ||
| It's all shut down. | ||
| They're in the news. | ||
| Receiver, boom. | ||
| As soon as the 20 days after the Supreme Court of Connecticut said that they wouldn't hear the thing, they said, we're coming. | ||
| And that the receiver's down in Houston bragging, he's coming as soon as he can. | ||
| We got legal issues, things going on. | ||
| We got a backup network I don't own, so they can't get that. | ||
| But when you go to the yellowshiftstore.com, I don't own that. | ||
| That's our sponsor. | ||
| That will keep us on the air. | ||
| We've got to launch the new site. | ||
| All the stuff's going on. | ||
| I've been so busy fighting the globalists and things. | ||
| You know, the folks have got that almost built. | ||
| A lot of things are going on. | ||
| But our work is so important, and the bad guys want us off the air. | ||
| So go to TheYellowShowStore.com right now. | ||
| Get the very best Methylene Blue. | ||
| So good for your mind. | ||
| So good for your mitochondria. | ||
| The very best iris CMOS. | ||
| The very best Chilogy. | ||
| The very best turmeric. | ||
| All of this is great stuff for your mind. | ||
| So empowering for your body. | ||
| TheYellowShowStore.com. | ||
| And be sure... | ||
| And become a VIP member. | ||
| You get $40 to spend each month in there for $30. | ||
| There's a bunch of extra specials and things. | ||
| If you ever want a product to sell out, you need to become a subscriber. | ||
| Get huge discounts at theolishoestore.com. |
Export Selection