Owen Shroyer slams Speaker Mike Johnson’s rushed 1,547-page CR—violating the 72-hour rule—packed with $69K congressional pay hikes, Obamacare opt-outs, and biolab funding, calling it a "swamp tradition" doomed by GOP backlash from Musk, Greene, and others. He ties it to border chaos, like Pedro Parra’s alleged arson in Texas, and demands Paxton’s lawsuit against Harris County’s Uplift program expose welfare corruption. Shroyer also exposes California’s "coming out" school assignments, Pennsylvania’s illegal race-based grants, and CNN’s denial of anti-Trump bias, while Jones claims globalists are collapsing under Trump’s human trafficking crackdown. The episode ends with a call for patriotic support amid escalating culture wars. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, it's Wednesday, December 18th, 2024. This is the InfoWars War Room.
And it's a busy day today.
A busy day on Capitol Hill.
A busy day to hear on the InfoWars War Room in the InfoWars World Headquarters in Austin, Texas.
Now, of course, the big news today, which is going to carry most of the weight of today's transmission...
The text of the continued resolution bill has been made public.
Over 1500 pages of absolute pork violates the 72-hour rule.
Over 1500 pages with less than 1500 minutes until they're supposed to pass it.
It's complete insanity.
Now, I will say, as bad as this deal is, as corrupt as our Congress is, There is a silver lining in all of this today.
There is a silver lining in all of this today.
And I will tell you what that is.
But we're going to be going to the Capitol.
I've got clips from how many different members of Congress today.
We've got Chip Roy.
We've got Marjorie Taylor Greene.
We've got Tommy Tuberville.
We've got Eric Burleson.
We've got Nancy Mace.
We've got Tim Burchett, we've got Thomas Massey, Rick Scott, and more.
We'll be hearing from all of them, their thoughts on this bill, as well as a list.
It's updating, seemingly, as the hours go by, a list of all the Republicans that are pledging to vote no.
Which then brings us to the Mike Johnson situation.
Now, we also have clips from Mike Johnson.
He's done a couple media interviews today.
We'll show you what he's saying.
It's not good.
But nonetheless, he's done the interviews.
He's made his case.
He doesn't have the support.
So he's going to have to get the votes from the Democrats to get this bill passed, which I don't think would necessarily surprise anybody, but it would be very telling just from the optics.
He does not have the Republican votes.
It'll be interesting to see what happens in the next 24 to 48 hours as Republican members of the House realize, I better not vote for this bill or I'm going to get primaried.
That's where we're at.
So some Republicans that might normally just show up, vote, and go home for Christmas, as is tradition on these Christmas tree spending bills.
It's what they're known as in Washington, D.C. They would show up, vote yes, go home for Christmas.
No harm, no foul as they see it.
Well, not today.
Not today.
Because you see, Trump voters, who are most Republican voters, obviously the vast majority, They are engaged.
They are activated.
They are watching these things.
They care now.
So they can't just show up and vote for this bill and think, hey, no problem.
It's not going to go well for them.
They will be primaried.
They will receive backlash.
And it's not just a potential of a primary where they think, well, maybe I can make up for it or...
There won't be too much smoke here.
No, it's gonna be not just the smoke today.
It's gonna be the Elon Musk America PAC that is immediately going to look into primarying whoever votes for this bill.
So now they're gonna be sitting, the Republicans are gonna be sitting back and saying, okay, well, hmm, now it's kind of comfortable to not vote for this bill.
I'll probably look better for not voting for this bill.
So then where does Speaker Johnson get the votes?
A lot of big developments.
We're going to give you all different opinions from members of Congress.
And then we're going to show you what's actually in this bill.
I mean, this thing is unbelievable.
I mean, this government hates you.
It hates you.
We've got multiple final countdowns.
We've got six days, eight hours, and 53 minutes until Christmas.
We're all looking forward to Christmas.
Merry Christmas.
Six days, eight hours, 53 minutes until Christmas.
And then we have 32 days, 19 hours, and 52 minutes until Inauguration Day.
So here's the deal.
Before we go to all these different members of Congress for their opinions, their comments, their statements, we'll hear from Vivek Ramaswamy, we'll hear from Elon Musk.
We'll go even directly into the bill so you can see the ridiculousness of it.
And then we'll get a little more frame, a little more context from some of the members of Congress that are saying, hey, look, this is how they do it.
And they're dangling federal aid to hurricane victims.
They're dangling military funding.
They're dangling getting the bridge funded from the bridge collapse.
They're dangling all these things.
And then it's 90% just pork.
Special interests, foreign interests, and then things that you just read and you say, why is this even in the bill?
Whose idea was it to even put this in the bill?
Of course, it's all the foreign interests, it's all the special interests that write these bills.
And then they give them to Congress completely illegally, violating the 72-hour rule, and Speaker Johnson still says, we have to pass this.
But let's just start off with the positive, shall we?
Which is, you know, kind of hard to see.
I'm just as frustrated and sick of this corrupt government as everybody else.
And man, oh man, is it a resounding...
It is a resounding response today.
And that's kind of the positive that we'll lead with today.
There is a silver lining in all of this.
And we'll kind of look at the political implications, but more so, let's just talk about the American people.
There has never been a more robust response to a continued resolution, omnibus bill, Specifically, these Christmas tree spending bills that they do, than there is today.
There has never been a more resounding response of negativity to a bill like this, like we're seeing today.
And so this has a couple implications.
This means a couple things.
One, we the people, Trump voters specifically, We are more engaged, more activated, and paying closer attention.
We care more en masse, at large, generally speaking, than ever before.
And we are fed up with how corrupt our government is.
We're paying attention to it now.
They can't just railroad these things home and get away with it.
Now, they might do it, but they won't be receiving much support, and they will be receiving backlash.
And so that's a good sign.
And we have very big voices, like Elon Musk, all over it today.
Probably over a hundred posts on this today.
Vivek Ramaswamy, he's all over it.
People are using AI, including my crew, just plugging it into an AI, saying here's what AI's cranking out as kind of a summary of a 5,200-plus page bill.
People are paying attention.
They're fed up.
They're over it.
You can't just use us and abuse us anymore.
So that's a good sign.
There's a pulse from we the people.
We're paying attention to what normally would just be the mundane political process.
And they could pass these bills, these Christmas tree bills, and most Americans wouldn't even hear a peep in the night.
That's not the case today.
You're fired up.
You're upset.
You're letting your representation know.
You're calling your representatives.
You're calling your senators.
You're calling your House of Representatives.
And you're saying, do not vote for this bill.
So that's happening.
That's a good thing.
And now you get into the political implications of this.
And this is where it gets real interesting, real hairy for me.
Speaker Johnson has been the lead voice in supporting this bill.
Almost a complete voice in the wilderness.
A lone voice.
I'm not really hearing anybody come out in support of it.
He made it clear he doesn't even know what's in it.
He knows he supports it, but he doesn't even know what's in it.
And then when the interviewer, which actually happened on CNN, brought up to him one of the parts of it, he was like, oh, that's in there, didn't even know it.
So they're going to vote for these bills.
They don't even know what's in it.
That is completely unacceptable.
That is criminal.
Complete dereliction of duty.
Complete negligence to vote for something and not even read it.
That's how corrupt our politicians are.
So Johnson is the only one really doing a public support campaign for this.
And we'll show you his statements.
But he's virtually a voice in the wilderness.
Now, at a very specific Mike Johnson level, For the last couple of months, the very people that Mike Johnson has been currying favor to, like Elon Musk, like Vivek Ramaswamy,
like the people inside of the Trump camp and Donald Trump himself, he's been running around with their team and next administration and going to the fights and the football games and getting the photobombs.
Well, now with this bill, he's basically thumbing his nose at them and completely severing himself politically from them.
All the people he's been running around with, currying favor to, sucking up to, photobombing, all of them are against this bill.
So how's that going to go?
When he's running around with Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who don't want this bill, How's that going to go now that he's supporting it and everybody's vehemently against it?
How does that end?
And if you are Mike Johnson, I wonder, what is he thinking?
What is he thinking, taking the stump for this bill that nobody wants, the entire blame is going to be put on him, And the very people that probably could have saved his political career, he's now stabbed in the back politically.
Where does he go from here?
What is he thinking?
He has thrown away his political future for this bill.
Why?
Why?
I do not get it.
It reeks of corruption.
It reeks of scandal.
It reeks of blackmail.
But let's not even go down that road.
I don't see how he can be Speaker of the House again after this.
I don't see how he can even win another House election after this.
He's going to be a number one target.
Musk is going to throw money behind a primary.
The American people are going to get behind a primary.
Somebody in Louisiana that wants to get involved in politics is going to see a seat that's ripe for the taking.
He has time, but based off of the things he said today, I don't see that happening.
This is also good news, by the way.
Because with Johnson running around and sucking up to Trump and Musk and everybody else...
He was kind of positioning himself to be a Speaker of the House again and get in there and do the same Mike Johnson stuff.
Worse than Kevin McCarthy, by the way.
It was the right move to get rid of Kevin McCarthy, but Mike Johnson has been worse than Kevin McCarthy.
That's a fact.
So two things can be true.
It was the right thing to get rid of McCarthy, but Speaker Mike Johnson has been worse than Speaker McCarthy.
But he was positioning himself...
Sucking up to Trump, photobombing with Trump, riding around with the next administration.
So he was positioning himself.
He was going to be Speaker again.
After this, I don't see that.
I don't see that happening.
And this isn't some Internet phenomenon.
This isn't some phenomenon of alternative media.
These are, inside the House, members of Congress saying, what the hell?
Giving Mike Johnson the what for?
Which might even soon be resulting in a majority of votes just within the Republican Party of the House against this bill.
Because they're going to lick their fingers, they're going to see which way the wind blows, and they're going to say, hmm, there's a lot of Republicans not supporting this bill and they're getting the most support.
Maybe I should go along with that and not support this bill.
It really doesn't do me any good to vote for this bill, especially if the Republicans aren't going to vote for it.
Ooh, that's going to be an interesting political development.
The American people are more awake and engaged than ever.
And we have very impactful voices on the front lines here, like Elon Musk.
And Mike Johnson, who's been a complete disaster, a complete spineless coward, I'm pretty sure he just stuck the final nail in his political coffin today, at least as Speaker of the House.
So those are the two good things that are developing, despite reading this bill and watching how the American people just get deceived and run over and raped by this crap.
And Johnson's willing to die on this hill.
But I'm not sure.
I'm not so sure that Republicans are willing to die on this hill.
And based off what I've seen, there's going to be a lot of Republicans that are going to vote against this bill.
Dozens have already come out publicly against it.
So that's a good thing.
Now if this thing passes, you take the good with the bad, but those are the good things to come of this.
And it creates this new This expectation, let's say, from Republican members of the House, from their constituents, more importantly, you're not going to vote on these bills and get away with it.
We're going to be paying attention.
We're going to see what's in these bills.
And if you vote on it, we're not going to be happy and we're going to let you know about it.
Well, that makes it more comfortable for them not to vote, which is already what we're seeing, based just off today's comments from Capitol Hill.
But look at this thing.
Here's your 1,500 plus page bill.
It's 1,547 pages.
Look at that thing.
It's about a foot tall.
A stack of paper written by special interests and foreign interests to screw over the American people.
To steal your money.
Hey, Congress, stop stealing our money, please.
Hey, U.S. government, stop stealing our money.
I'm sick of you stealing our money.
I'm sick of you thieves stealing our money.
Congressman Michael McLeod puts it into perspective here.
The CR vote will be today at 5 p.m.
I'd be stunned if they don't push it back because it's such a disaster at this point, and I don't know if Johnson has the votes.
The CR vote will be today at 5 p.m., which is 1,345 minutes after the text was received.
There are 1,547 pages in the bill.
That's less than one minute per page to read the continued resolution text.
Congressman Michael McLeod says, I will be a no vote.
Complete violation of the 72-hour rule.
Elon Musk says no bills should pass Congress until January 20th when Trump takes office.
None.
Zero.
Representative Kat Kamek, Republicans should start an OnlyFans account considering how often we get screwed.
Rick Scott, we got the 1,500 plus page not so clean CR last night.
There's no way anyone is reading this whole thing that quickly.
It's longer than the average Bible, for goodness sake.
This is the same tired trick Washington uses repeatedly to force reckless spending and wasteful government programs through Congress, forcing us to vote on bills before we even know what's in them.
It has to stop.
Let's look at some of the text, shall we?
And just get into how absolutely absurd this all is.
This has been going on for decades, folks.
And we're finally, properly responding to it.
And that might not, probably not even properly yet.
You know, I don't know what the modern day Tea Party would look like.
Boston Tea Party, but you know what I'm saying.
But we are responding to it.
Two provisions buried in the CR that Congress is trying to slip by.
A pay increase for members of Congress.
Now there's some debate about what the pay increase actually is.
But it looks like they're going from $174,000 a year to $243,000 a year.
I think it just remembers on what roles you have.
Also, members of Congress are receiving an opt-out from being required to use Obamacare.
Oh!
They don't have to sign up for the insurance that they passed.
Isn't that something?
So they get themselves a pay raise, and then they don't have to be on the government health care.
Isn't that amazing?
Very special bunch.
Very special bunch.
And maybe we should just stop right there quickly.
Here's Democrat Dick Durbin, who was asked about the bill.
He's never read it.
He doesn't know what's in it.
And the CNN reporter has to tell him, you know, you get a raise.
Oh, he loves that.
unidentified
Clip 15. Members are giving themselves a pay raise.
Democrats eating Democrats on live TV. It's cannibalism right there on CNN. All right.
That's good.
So that's Democrat Dick Durbin saying, oh, I didn't know.
How did I not know?
Great question, Dick!
Oh, I'm getting a pay raise?
Hey, I like that.
How did I not know that?
Wow, that should be a question we're asking you, not you're asking us.
And then the CNN reporter says, yeah, you know, you guys kind of suck.
You're not very popular.
The people don't think you deserve a raise, so why should you get a raise?
And then Durbin says, well, what about the media?
You're not popular either.
Yo, the media doesn't get paid by taxpayers, even though that probably isn't entirely true, as we found out yesterday.
But let's just put that aside for the sake of this conversation.
I mean, that is clown stuff.
Democrat cannibalism on CNN. A clown Democrat says, I didn't know I was getting a pay raise.
How did I not know that?
Hey, great question, Dick.
And then he scolds the media?
Incredible stuff.
We go back to the bill.
A new provision in the latest CR lets Congress block subpoenas for the House data, including emails, potentially preventing any investigation into the January 6th committee.
Upon a motion made promptly by a house office or provider for a house office, a court of contempt jurisdiction shall quash or modify any legal process directed to the provider for a house office if compliance with the legal process would require the disclosure of house data of the house office.
Oh, they're above the law?
I thought nobody was above the law.
Let's be perfectly clear exactly what the motions to quash or modify portion of this bill is all about.
It's all about January 6th committee deleting evidence.
Because, folks, they've been caught.
And it's not just the Republican members of the House that know it.
It's also the incoming Trump administration, including...
In the FBI. So I wonder whose idea it was to put that in the bill.
As Liz Cheney and other members of the January 6th committee are being recommended for criminal charges.
Obstruction of evidence.
Tampering with evidence.
Illegally destroying government documents.
Whose idea do you think the motions to quash or modify section of this bill, whose idea do you think that was?
That is 100% to protect the January 6th committee.
Disgusting.
Disgusting.
It's also got some vaccine and mask mandates in there.
Section 629, yeah, 629, Regional Biocontainment Research Laboratories shall make awards to establish or maintain as applicable not fewer than 12 regional biocontainment laboratories for the purpose Regional Biocontainment Research Laboratories shall make awards to establish or maintain as applicable not fewer than 12 regional biocontainment laboratories for the purpose of conducting biomedical research to support possible health and
Ensuring the availability of surge capacity for purposes of responding to biological events, supporting information sharing and the dissemination of findings to researchers and other relevant individuals to facilitate collaboration between industry and academia,
providing technical assistance and training to researchers and other relevant individuals to support the biomedical research workforce in improving the management And mitigation of safety and security risks in the conduct of researching involving such biological agents.
Except that's exactly what they did when they were making COVID. That's exactly what they did with the gain-of-function research at North Carolina.
It was illegal, so they sent it to Wuhan, China.
And now they're putting it in this bill?
And they say we have to pass this bill because we need the emergency funding.
Well, none of what I just read is about emergency funding.
unidentified
Last Christmas, I gave you my heart.
But the very next day, you gave it away.
This year, to save me from tears, I'll give it to someone special.
We don't normally like what's called a continued resolution, a CR, but in this case it makes sense because if we push it into the first quarter of next year, then we have a Republican-controlled Congress and President Donald J. Trump back in the White House will be able to have more say over the funding decisions for 2025. Now, that would have been an easier thing to do, but then we had circumstances outside of our control.
We had these emergencies that are required.
So we had, as you know, a record hurricane season.
We had Helene and Milton, and they just did massive destruction across our red states, frankly, in the southeast and the eastern side of the country.
And then we've had farmers who are in jeopardy of permanently going under.
They've had three lost years in a row because of Bidenomics and inflation and other circumstances outside of their And so when you cobble those two things together, there's a desperate need for that aid and that's what adds another hundred plus billion dollars to the bill and that's why everybody's uncomfortable with it.
I am too.
We have a massive deficit and debt problem of course in this country.
We can begin to address that and shrink the size and scope of government in January with Republican control, but we've got to bridge the gap to get there, and we cannot leave our small farms and ranchers and our inner people who are devastated by the hurricanes out in the meantime.
So that's the difficult part about this.
That's what people are really struggling with, and I am too, but we have a responsibility here, and that's legislating.
You have a responsibility for pork barrel spending?
You have a responsibility to take real issues that maybe the American people would support passing a bill before Christmas and then shoving 10,000 other issues into it as well?
That's your responsibility?
And what is this lie he keeps telling?
Who's writing him these lies?
You don't have control of the House?
Why the hell not?
Explain that one to me.
Somebody explain that one to me because I'm not getting that.
You can't get the votes from the Republicans?
Why not?
Are there Republicans in the House that are actually Democrats?
Am I missing something here, Speaker?
It's not adding up.
The math is no good.
This is Marjorie Taylor Greene predicting exactly what Speaker Johnson would do in the halls of the Capitol, predicting it to a T in clip 18. Well, it's really turning into, it's not a CR, which is a continuation of the budget.
It's turning into an omnibus, is what it sounds like to me.
Where they're packing in, everybody's packing in what they want here and there and using the pressure.
And the situation of the government shutdown.
Of course, tragically, farmers are being dangled.
Americans that suffered through natural disasters, they're being dangled with disaster relief.
And I think that's incredibly unfair.
And think about it like this.
If this is going to turn into a three-month omnibus, basically, then why aren't we doing the heavy lifting on The upcoming debt ceiling, situations that we have to deal with in March, government funding.
But no.
And we don't have any bill text.
I have no idea what's in the CR, except just basic things that we were told in there.
And then reading often you guys' ex-accounts, because somehow y'all magically know things, oftentimes more quicker than I do.
I mean, obviously, you have been critical of Speaker Johnson in the past, but you seem to have, you know, given him a little bit of grace here since somebody else was running against him.
What are your sort of thoughts on how he handled the situation?
Not just in September with the clip we played yesterday, but even years ago.
And Johnson even promised he wouldn't do this.
And now he's doing the exact same thing.
And Massey put this out today.
People call me Nostra Thomas for accurately predicting Speaker Johnson would use the Christmas recess to force a massive spending bill through Congress after claiming he wouldn't do it.
Johnson is embracing a D.C. tradition that's nearly as old as decorating the Christmas tree.
Representative Thomas Massey has been speaking about this for years.
This is why they call him Nostra Thomas in Clip 12. We have broken the Christmas Omni, and I have no intention of going back to that terrible tradition.
So there won't be a Christmas Omni bus.
Somebody asked me in the hallway a little while ago, will there be many buses?
Listen, I've seen this play call like four times in the seven years I've been in Congress.
They've punted the ball until December 20th.
And what they'll do is they'll come in a closed room with us and they'll say, OK, now we've got the really big omnibus.
And if you vote for this, you can go home for Christmas.
But if you don't vote for it and it fails, we're going to make you stay here over Christmas and New Year's.
And it's almost like a dystopian future.
I've been in the closed room where they start chanting, vote, vote, vote, vote.
And people run up there and vote for something they've not read.
CR, CR, CR. Oh, you want to go home for Christmas?
We'll vote for this and we'll let you go see your families and your new grandbaby and you can watch your two-year-old open presence.
But if you don't, you're going to stay here with your leadership and their leadership and wait for a bunch of geriatric senators to send over the answer.
By the way, I made another prediction that it would end right before Christmas, that it wouldn't go until next spring.
Because, and we've talked about this on your show, Brian, for as long as I've been coming on your show, which is at least 12 years.
Christmas Eve shutdown panic because here's what they're doing.
They're taking our families hostage, the families of congressmen.
Congressmen in Washington, D.C. on December 20th, which is when this CR expires, and they're going to either put another worse CR that's probably going to have Ukraine and everything else attached to it, or they're going to do the full-on omnibus.
Depending on how the election comes out, they're gonna do that on December 20th, and the congressman, they're gonna smell those jet fumes from DCA, the Ronald Reagan Airport, and the combination of the fumes from those airplanes wafting over to the Capitol, and this CR expiring then, they're gonna start chanting, vote, vote, vote, and they will vote for anything you put in front of them.
Because the speaker always comes and says, this doesn't matter who the speaker is, They always say, if you vote for this, you can go home and open presents with your family.
And if you don't vote for this, we're going to be here over Christmas because the optics are bad.
And just go ahead and tell your families, pack up those presents and bring them to Washington, D.C. if they want to be with you at Christmas.
Nobody's going to bring their family to D.C. over Christmas.
They're like the Grinch.
Yeah, some people call me Nostra Thomas for predicting this.
But the reality is, Brian, we could go back.
It's a lot of work.
We could go back on your radio show.
We could find clips of me predicting this every year.
It's not a prediction.
It's just how the swamp works and the Uniparty works.
Listen, Congress being surprised by the fiscal deadline of September 30th is like a florist being surprised by Valentine's Day.
This is why I ran for Congress to try to stop this.
And sadly, this is happening again.
I think that it's shameful that people that celebrate Doge coming in, I can't, and yet we're gonna vote for another billion dollars to be added to the deficit.
Multiple subject matters, important healthcare legislation in the context of extenders piled on the back of a three-month CR with about $110 billion unpaid for, $25 billion in healthcare policy, half of which is fake pay for, being sold that is paid for, because they're gimmicks and shuffling around the decks.
Things like E15, which we didn't even have a full debate on.
This is not the way to do business.
The conference needs to decide whether we're actually serious about spending.
They talk about, well, we gotta do mandatory spending reform and bend the curve.
But we just voted on a $200 billion shift of dollars in Social Security that's gonna shorten the time when Social Security expires or goes bankrupt.
We're just fundamentally unserious about spending.
And as long as you got a blank check, you can't shrink government.
If you can't shrink government, you can't live free.
Now again, there's already enough no's on the Republican side.
I have a list here, but it's outdated now.
There's already enough no votes on the Republican side that Speaker Johnson cannot get this passed without the Democrats.
And every single one, probably.
Because now it's going to be more comfortable for a Republican that just wants to stay in office To vote no instead of yes.
So the tide has completely turned on this thing.
This bill is basically dead on arrival unless Speaker Johnson can somehow corral the Democrats to get this thing through.
Which I guess isn't completely out of the picture, but...
And I guess for him, his political career, he might view his political career as dead already, so might as well just convert to a Democrat in my final run and just go from there.
And then his time as Speaker will be up too, if it isn't already.
By the way, there was a Doge caucus meeting yesterday, and the room was full.
They didn't even have enough seats in the room.
Normally, these caucus meetings are lightly attended.
Here's more from Chip Roy on Fox News earlier today, clip 16. I mean, my message to the speaker privately, and I'll say to you, and I'm trying to give respect to try to move this through.
If we can, try to figure out how to get it to the right place.
But what we ought to do is just do a simple CR with a very simple small amount of disaster supplemental for the people in tents in North Carolina, and that's it.
That's what we were talking about doing.
But what this has now become is a Christmas tree bill, and it should not be moving forward.
And the speaker should not bring it up today.
unidentified
We should not vote on it in less than 24 hours of having seen 1,550 pages of There's no way you can do all of that, no offense to you sir, but there's no way you can do all of that before you want to go out on recess.
What we said we would do a week ago, which is a CR to march and have something in there very tight and narrowly confined to make sure that there's money in the disaster recovery fund, the DERF, for the people in North Carolina, the people that are hurting.
But make sure we can have a vote to pay for it.
We've offered all sorts of opportunities.
For example, we have a bill that I filed yesterday, it's called the DOGE Act, that would cut Non-defense spending by 13% to pre-COVID levels, that's $113 billion.
That would pay for all of this.
We just wanted to get a vote on that, Neil, because we can't keep spending money we don't have.
So why couldn't Speaker Johnson just do what he said he was going to do or do what even the members of the Republican side of the House wanted him to do?
Simple bills for disaster relief until the next Congress.
Why wouldn't he do it?
Why is Johnson doing this?
Reeks of corruption.
Reeks of blackmail.
Reeks of a controlled congressman.
Quick one from Nancy Mace responding.
unidentified
Clip 19. Today is like that movie Groundhog Day.
Same type of bill, a continuing resolution that hasn't actually cut spending.
This is what DC does.
They manufacture a crisis.
Government shut down.
They manufacture this crisis to get as much stuff into this bill.
We call it a Christmas tree bill because everybody gets something and then more and you get stuck with the tab and makes things so much more, less affordable for you, the American people.
Representative Andrew Clyde responding clip 23. Congressman, good to see you.
unidentified
What strikes you about this bill?
Good morning, Maria.
Well, I'll tell you, the most egregious thing about this bill is you've got at least $110 billion, perhaps up to $125 billion, that is not paid for, that is unpaid for.
That's more borrowing to our national debt.
And that's just not what the country told the president and told Congress when they gave the president a mandate Every swing state he took, he took the popular vote, and the entire focus of the country was control spending in Washington, D.C., and this bill does the exact opposite to that.
This is not following the theory of government efficiency.
So what can you do about it?
Well, we can certainly vote against it, and I will be voting no on this bill from what I have seen so far.
But we simply need to tell the American people that they need to get a hold of their members of Congress and say, this is not acceptable.
This is not why we gave you the majority in the House, the Senate, and sent President Trump back to the White House.
In Search of the Missing Kids with Clip 8. We're going to deputize every U.S. citizen in this country to help us find 340,000 missing children because we need the public's help on this.
Every mom and dad knows what it's like.
They have a gut feeling when they see something out there in the public that there's something ain't right with that child.
So we're going to deputize every one of them to help us find these children.
unidentified
So you think Americans are ready to be deputized even though Blue City mayors say no to that?
We are sick and tired, truly fed up of basically paying taxes into a system where our hard-earned tax dollars are used against us.
Housing, illegal aliens that should never have been allowed in our country.
And now we bear the responsibility of finding hundreds of thousands of missing children.
You know, the reality is many of these children probably won't be found, and that's what is so heartbreaking and unforgivable.
Many of these kids have been sold into labor camps, slavery, child sex slavery, and you name it, the horrors I can't even imagine.
And I can't tell you, January 20th cannot come fast enough for Tom Homan to be in charge, and I look forward to any American being deputized To go look for these kids, but also turn in illegal aliens and criminals that shouldn't be here.
And I'm telling you, it's gonna be great, and I really look forward to it.
Now, a shocking and horrifying story out of Texas.
Shocking truth about Texas' father who set house on fire with three kids inside.
Greg Abbott, blast migrant accused of setting Texas home on fire with the children inside.
Locate and deport.
Listen to this report with the shocking police body cam footage of the heroic rescue.
unidentified
Hi, Dana.
Yeah, the father, a Venezuelan migrant, is accused of setting his house on fire intentionally with his three kids inside.
Now, the two teenagers, they managed to escape.
They told police they believe that their three-year-old little brother is still trapped inside the home.
Check out this shocking body camera footage.
Police!
I got you quick!
I got you quick!
The officer breaks through the window, rescues that three-year-old abandoned and trapped inside the burning home right outside of Houston.
The child's father, Pedro Luis Parra, arrested, charged with three counts of attempted murder.
His burns from the fire where you could see them in his mugshot.
The officer who saved the boy says he immediately thought of his own kids and had the chance to visit the boy after.
And when you have kids and you're dealing with kids, it's natural to relate that to your home life.
But no, during the time, you're in police mode doing what we do.
And Parra is now behind bars on a $2.25 million bond and an ICE hold.
ICE officials will not say how he got into the U.S. citing privacy laws, but Texas Governor Greg Abbott took to X expressing his outrage.
He said, quote, a Venezuelan immigrant, legal status unknown, accused of setting a Texas house on fire.
With children inside, he better spend the rest of his life behind bars.
Now, he is now among the seven million migrants right now in the United States on the non-detained docket, meaning that they are here in the United States, not in federal ICE custody as they await their immigration hearings, Dana.
All right, Brooke Taylor, terrible story, but I'm glad that little boy survived.
We'll ask him these questions and we'll get the latest buzz from Capitol Hill in the aftermath of all of it.
But there's been a couple other developments on the Capitol today of significance.
In reversal, key house panel votes to release Matt Gaetz' ethics report.
Now, if you go back to the whole scandal, let's call it, Matt Gaetz was nominated to be the Attorney General.
The whole beginning of the process starts.
They basically threaten him out of the position, forcing him to resign.
And it's because of this ethics report, which had been investigated and there were no criminal charges afterwards.
So it's probably mostly hearsay, but maybe some things Gates is embarrassed about or maybe some things he just doesn't want to deal with it anymore and just didn't want to go through the confirmation process.
So he resigns.
And I'm sure, or withdraws rather, and I'm sure part of this negotiation was, look, just step away.
And we won't release the report.
Well, now they're going to do it anyway.
Now they're going to release the report anyway.
So Matt Gage responded saying...
Someone suggested the following plan to me.
Show up on January 3rd, 2025 to Congress.
That's when the next congressional session starts is January 3rd.
Participate in speaker election...
I was elected to the 119th Congress after all, so he can vote for Speaker.
Take the oath.
File a privileged motion to expose every MeToo settlement paid using public funds, even of former members.
Then resign and start my OANN program at 9 p.m.
Eastern on January 6, 2025. A little plug for his new show.
What do you think about that?
I kind of like that plan.
Personally.
I personally like that plan.
It just shows how dirty these dealers are.
I guarantee you they said, hey, look, just withdraw and we won't release the report.
But if you don't, it's all going to come out in the hearing.
So he withdraws and then they say, well, I'm going to release the report anyway.
How do you like that?
F you.
So he should do that.
He's not the only one thinking about that congressional fund to pay off all of these Allegations of sexual abuse.
Marjorie Taylor Greene says something similar and more in Clip 17. I support all the lists being released.
Yeah, the Epstein list, the Congressional slush fund, sex accusation list, maybe the Diddy list too.
Let's just go ahead and release them all.
Let's just see what kind of scumbaggery there are.
Individuals trying to influence our politics, influence our culture, that are really just blackmailed and engaged in the most sordid and disgusting behavior you've ever heard of.
Let's just go ahead and do it all.
You want to take Matt Gaetz down?
Okay, let's go ahead.
Bring out all the lists, which Kash Patel says he would do.
Now, remember, in the bill, we covered this in the first hour, in the bill, there's a little section that basically provides a hedge of legal protection over the January 6th committee for the crimes that they've committed, deleting government documents, destroying evidence, evidence tampering.
I'm sure there's a bunch of charges you could look at there.
But that's what they did.
Whatever it is, Liz Cheney and Benny Thompson, whatever it is that they were trying to hide from the people, whatever it is they were trying to hide from the incoming Republican House, they deleted it.
They got rid of it right before the Republicans took over the House in 2022. There were very likely crimes committed.
I mean, 99.9% crimes committed.
So who put that text into the bill protecting them for whatever crimes they committed?
So this is like total admittance of guilt here.
First, they're asking Joe Biden to do a preemptive pardon of the January 6th committee.
That's a bit of an admission of guilt.
Then they're putting text into the continued resolution bill that gives them a hedge of legal protection against any charges or investigations.
Certainly another admittance of guilt.
So here's Tim Burchett discussing this, saying, hey, they committed crimes.
Clip 22. Should Liz Cheney be criminally prosecuted?
Is Liz Cheney going to be put under oath?
Are Republicans going to get serious about going after those who perpetrated one of the greatest crimes and psyops on the American people and innocent Americans in our movement?
I say we'll kick the can down the road, but if she broke the law, she ought to go to jail.
If she tampered with witnesses, if she manipulated folks, if she in fact talked to a witness prior to the On a secured type of device to be able to hamper anything in the future, you're dadgum right.
You're dadgum right.
You know, they're making it gospel, this thing, this investigation of Matt Gaetz.
And the Justice Department didn't even, the Justice Department, they threw it out.
They said the witnesses, they weren't valid.
And yet we're saying that's the gospel.
And now the left's raising cane that we even question the fact that we want to question Liz Cheney on something that was the most politicized garbage.
Look, I was the very last member of Congress to leave the House floor.
Mark Wayne Muller went out and I followed him.
And I volunteered to them, I would love to come speak about what I saw.
And I realized they didn't want to talk about what happened.
They wanted to talk about the politics of involvement.
They didn't allow the former speaker's choices.
They didn't want Jim Jordan on there.
They didn't want others.
But they had to pick theirs, which is not the rules of 200 plus years of Congress.
And it just went down that pike.
And that's what they did.
And the final version of America is tired of that.
They don't want to hear any more from those idiots.
The final version, I think more people were watching a rerun on the Cartoon Network of SpongeBob SquarePants than watch that miserable clown show.
Now, let's explain this, because this has been a frustration, too.
Whenever you hear members of Congress or people in the government say, oh, well, you know, I wish we could do this, wish we could do that, and it's like, you're there right now.
It's like Kamala Harris's entire presidential campaign was running against Biden, but she was the vice president.
So there's a little bit of that here, but we won't even focus on that.
We now know, and we've known this for a while, but now it's been public information, public knowledge, that there were dozens of federal agents in some way, shape, or form on the ground on January 6th.
There's different videos that are now re-emerging of people getting arrested, walked away, being released, fist bumps with the cops.
Police body cam footage of them undercover all over the place chanting.
So undercover agents, confidential informants, whatever brush they want to stroke over this brush.
Okay, there was federal involvement on that day.
You have the stand down of the National Guard from Mario Bowser.
You have the stand down of the Capitol Police by Nancy Pelosi.
You have all these feds on the ground.
So the whole thing was a set up.
And then, of course this is all in response to a stolen election, you know, maybe keep that in mind, the bigger story.
And then they put innocent men in prison, they violate the First Amendment, and they charge thousands of men and women, grandmothers, veterans, many of which...
Who did nothing more than just walk on a blade of grass, nothing more than just wave an American flag, walk through the velvet ropes of the Capitol.
99% of the charges were non-violent offenders and they're still charging people to this day.
That was a tremendous wrong against the American people.
A tremendous wrong against innocent Americans, innocent men and women.
We cannot let this go.
And now, you have two, I would say, wide open and shut cases to bring the hammer down and open the door into larger investigations.
You have the January 6th committee destroying evidence Open and shut, total crime.
And they know it.
And they've basically admitted what they've done, asking for preemptive pardons and putting that text in this continued resolution bill, needing a hedge of legal protection from incoming charges.
So, there's an opening right there.
You also have Cassidy Hutchinson, In her testimony claiming that Donald Trump is climbing over the seats of the Beast and engaging in a WWE choke-out style fight wrestling match with Secret Service.
A complete fabrication.
A complete lie.
So there's all kinds of different angles you can go through to open this door into a larger investigation.
And those are your two starting points right there.
Cassidy Hutchinson lying in her testimony about a WWE wrestling match between Trump and Secret Service in the Beast, the presidential limo, and then the January 6th committee destroying evidence before the Republicans took over the chair.
And then from there, you can go anywhere you want.
You can go to Nancy Pelosi standing down Capitol Police.
You can go to Mariel Bowser standing down the National Guard.
You can go to all the federal informants on the ground.
Any way you want to go after that.
But those are two wide open and shut cases you got right there.
And no, we can't let this pass.
There's nothing we can do to reverse the stolen election of 2020. We got four years of Biden that crushed us.
It's over now.
But the wrongs, the crimes that have been committed, the innocent men and women that have been charged, thrown into prison, tortured, lives destroyed, legal bills, many have committed suicide, reputations destroyed.
That is a wrong we can right and we must right.
And I don't like hearing from members of Congress saying, well, I've lost all faith in this institution, so I have a 50-50 chance we can do anything about it.
No, make damn sure you do something about it.
Make damn sure you do something about it.
You are in the institution.
You are the institution.
So if you've lost faith in the institution, you've lost faith in yourself.
Completely unacceptable.
Alright.
The Pentagon had a press briefing today.
Of course, the drone issue at the heart of it.
They're lying and it's so obvious it's getting ridiculous.
Listen to what the Pentagon says in response to the classified hearing in clip nine.
unidentified
Just why does it have to be a classified briefing if these are just hobbyist drones?
They're not military drones.
Why is it a classified briefing on the Capitol Hill?
I'd have to refer you to Congress on that.
Again, sharing as much information as we can here.
He wants you to be afraid of China hacking in clip 10. China has, in fact, hacked into our telecommunications providers, some of them.
And the extent of it is quite serious.
And I should say that in response to that, we have taken action.
We in the federal government have stood up a unified coordination group, a multi-agency response to this hack.
Just today, our cybersecurity and infrastructure security agency published mobile communications best practices that everyone should read, especially people in positions of responsibility in the United States government.
It's a very sophisticated hack.
I can't speak publicly to how it occurred, but the telecom providers are focused intensely On it, and they are working in partnership with us to remediate it.
Chinese hacking, spy balloons, spy drones, a border invasion of tens of millions of people.
I don't think there is a single individual who has done more to harm this country than Alejandro Mayorkas.
He is the new Benedict Arnold.
He is probably a bigger traitor than Benedict Arnold.
And those spineless Republicans couldn't even impeach him.
Of course, they ran into Chuck Schumer, who basically made it illegal to impeach him, or just said, we're going to break the law and not let you impeach him.
Unbelievable, this guy.
The name, the face, Alejandro Mayorkas should go down in American history as one of the biggest traitors ever in the history of this country.
A man who has done more damage to this country than any other man perhaps in the history of this country, Alejandro Mayorkas.
Coming up next, we're going to be joined by Representative Eric Burleson, and we're going to get an update from the Capitol on the status of this bill, which is basically dead on arrival.
Speaker Johnson's options from here.
Ladies and gentlemen, remember at thealexjonesstore.com, that's where you can support us, including...
You still can get a Christmas sweater.
Might not be in time for Christmas, but it'll be very nice next Christmas.
I promise you that.
It will be very fun.
You'll like it a lot.
Whether it's the Bad Santa sweater, the Nakatomi Plaza sweater, or so much more, you can get all of that at thealexjonesstore.com.
And don't forget about the VIP club, thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. Where you get exclusive discounts and deals and advanced notice on giveaways, including exclusive giveaways.
And of course, with every purchase, with every purchase, you will get multiple entries into the Monster Truck Raffle giveaway.
Multiple entries with every purchase.
When you're a member of the VIP club, you get even more entries.
You can still get your 2025 calendar available now.
2025 calendar is available.
I might have a cameo on there.
I might have a cameo on the 2025 calendar.
You're going to want to get it.
All right, when we come back, we'll get an update on the situation with this bill dead on arrival from Capitol Hill with Representative Eric Burleson.
Alright, it's been a crazy day on Capitol Hill, and Representative Eric Burleson, his phone has been ringing off the hook.
He's already been doing the media rounds and really I would say the atmosphere has even changed around this continued resolution from this morning to where we're at right now.
So Representative Eric Burleson joining me now.
There's been a lot of developments just in the last couple of hours.
Donald Trump has just released a statement making headlines.
He's against this bill.
It would seem at this point now it would be comfortable for a Republican to vote against this bill instead of for it.
In fact, I'm hearing rumors that they have already scrapped it and they're trying to scramble to put something else together, maybe a skinnier version or a trimmed-down version of this bill, which would be a tremendous victory.
I was just telling someone else that I've been here for two years.
I've been so depressed about this place.
You come up here to save this country and try to course-correct and cut spending.
And instead, we took Nancy Pelosi's budget and we just continued to add more money to it, right?
More deficits.
More debt.
Again and again and again.
And it's got to stop.
And so what was so funny is whenever Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy came in and they were presenting Doge to us, and these guys were saying, you know, guys, we need you to change.
We want to go big.
We want to go quickly.
And we want to fix this country.
We want to eliminate the deficit.
And all the members were falling over each other to talk to them and get FaceTime.
Most of those members that went to the microphones to talk to these guys were the very people that have voted for all these continuing resolutions and all these omnibus bills and voted to add $200 billion liability to Social Security Trust Fund.
And so something has to shed light on the garbage that That members of Congress are doing.
And the fact that they're talking out of both sides of their mouth.
You've got very few people like me, members of the Freedom Caucus, who actually came up here to save this country and are willing to do the hard things and make the cuts.
But a lot of the other members are not willing to do that.
She talked about how it's very ironic that we're getting ready to vote on a $100 billion package that's going to add $100 billion to our debt, and yet we're having a meeting about Doge.
Well, you were one of the early voices to stand tall against this bill.
We salute you for that.
We need more people like you willing to take that stand.
I've kind of looked at the silver lining developing in the last, I guess, since this bill went public last night, is that there is this new attitude.
And a lot of it is the influence of maybe an Elon Musk and a Vivek Ramaswamy.
But I think for a long time, representatives, mostly on both sides of the aisle, but Republicans are supposed to be conservative.
And there's been this idea that, hey, I better vote for this bill or I'm going to look bad.
I better vote for this bill or I'm going to get primaried in the next session.
I feel today was a major shift.
I feel today it's the opposite.
Now Republicans, the ones that like to lick their finger and see which way the wind blows, now those Republicans are saying, hmm, actually I think it hurts me if I vote for this bill.
So surely by the numbers, Speaker Johnson cannot pass this bill with Republican votes.
There have been enough Republicans overwhelmingly that have come out and committed to a no vote.
This bill will not pass with a Republican vote.
So either Speaker Johnson, I guess, rallies the Democrats with Hakeem Jeffries and gets a handful of Republicans, or what is his other option at this point?
Yeah, he's either going to have to go with the package that he agreed with Hakeem and face the political consequences of that, or he's going to have to slim something, strip it down, get a skinny continuing resolution, maybe a clean one.
And then he'll get some votes from even hardcore fiscal conservatives like me if he puts pay-fors in the bill, right?
So if you're going to spend more money, but you're going to take it from the 87,000 new IRS agents, then yeah, I might consider voting for that.
But I'm not going to just spend money just because we want to add more to the debt.
Well, and it was Marjorie Taylor Greene and others that kind of said, hey, look, we didn't have time to negotiate this stuff.
And likely nobody's going to want to do that before Christmas anyway.
People would understand that.
But now is not the time to be shoving all of these different pork issues, special interest issues into this bill before, like you said, well, maybe there's time to negotiate.
Well, there's no room for negotiation now with just a week till Christmas and everybody wanting to go home and spend time with their family.
So, yeah, I'd love to see a debate like that happen on the floor, give people their time.
But that ship has sailed.
And so now you do have to wait until the next Congress gets in, unfortunately, to do that.
What about single issue bills?
We've heard this floated around.
For years, this has been talked about, actually.
Can we get a single-issue bill?
Can we get a one-line issue bill that says, here's money for hurricane relief, disaster relief?
But that's literally the way this town works, is that these members don't go in themselves and negotiate, and they're sending their staff in.
And I actually pressed back on the speaker whenever I heard about that.
And what the truth is, what I tell people is, The same goes, if I give my daughters $100 and say, go buy a Christmas present from me or mom, they're probably not going to spend the money, get the best possible gift they can.
They've just been given the task, here's $100, go get something.
And that's generally how it works.
You need to be in the room.
You need to be engaged.
You need to take responsibility and own it instead of letting your staff run the show.
Well, I don't want to put you on the spot with the Speaker Johnson issue right now, and I think Ralph Norman kind of said it correctly when he was asked about this.
He says, look, now's not the time to talk about what we're going to do in the next session dealing with who's going to be the Speaker of the House.
But it's impossible to ignore the position that Speaker Johnson is in now because the same people that he's been kind of currying favor with I don't see the American people really forgiving him politically for this.
So I just, how does Speaker Johnson say face?
I mean, to me, I guess the only thing is to come out, apologize for essentially saying he wouldn't do this, and then introducing maybe one or two single-issue bills and saying Merry Christmas.
I don't know how else he, I just don't know where he goes from here.
I mean, at the end of the day, he's only going to be speaker if Donald Trump wants him to be speaker.
Because at this point, there's enough frustration that if Trump indicates that he's not backing Johnson, then I think that Johnson will not be the next speaker.
You know, he may pull a rabbit out of this and do what you're talking about, put forward some single-subject-ish bills and a skinny CR or a clean CR, and then let everybody go home for Christmas and have some time to think about it.
You know, can I make a suggestion or ask you a question?
This is something that I think frustrates a lot of Republican voters.
And I've heard it multiple times from conservatives in Congress how the Democrats kind of hold this shutdown, this government shutdown over our heads like it's somehow a negative.
Can we shift the Republican response to that to embracing it?
The next time somebody comes up to you and holds it over your head like, oh, we're going to shut down the government, I would just one time or ten times or a hundred times love for a Republican to say, okay, good, good.
I think that should be the response.
I think that will actually make more people vote Republican.
The truth is, we need to be willing to shut down the government.
And the speaker needs to be willing to shut down the government.
Because the Democrats right now, they know that he's not willing to do it, and he's afraid of it.
And so they use that.
It's like a game of chicken.
If you know the other person is going to swerve, Then you've already won.
And so the fact that he's unwilling to do a shutdown is taking away a huge negotiation tool.
And to your point, we need to embrace it.
My district, people call in and they say, shut it down all the time.
I come from southwest Missouri.
People like the idea of government being shut down.
This is a government that's been hostile to them, a government that's throwing some of their friends and neighbors in jail for coming up here on January 6th.
You know, a government that spies on the American people without a warrant.
I would doubt that you're the only representative that's had that phenomenon.
I would guess multiple representatives have had the same thing.
100% have said, don't vote for this bill.
Yeah, 100% of my calls have said, do not vote for this C.R., I heard you say something when we first started this interview, and I heard Tim Burchett say this earlier today with Benny Johnson.
He said he's lost faith in the institution or a lot of the momentum or some of the gusto he came into Congress with kind of got beaten out of him.
Can you explain that phenomenon?
You know, I've seen it in media before where people will kind of get into political media and they'll have all these great things and, you know, let's just say the man takes the wind out of their sails.
Explain that phenomenon of wanting to get into Congress, actually make changes, maybe be anti-establishment, and then kind of losing that momentum, losing that faith.
Yeah, when you get up here, the moment that you get up here, they start trying to play the game and entice you with different committee assignments.
They try to get you to, you know, and they'll tell you, you got to fall in line.
And if you don't fall in line, you're not going to get the good committee assignments.
You're not going to be invited to all the cool parties and stuff like that, right?
So that's the whole posture of this town is just go along to get along.
And it's just few people in this town that are not like that.
Most of them are the Freedom Caucus.
That are truly warriors trying to save this country.
And so that's the only moment of hope that I have in my weekly meetings is the one meeting that I have each week with the members of the Freedom Caucus.
It's the one meeting that I don't feel like I have to take a shower after I leave that meeting.
So the rest of this town is just exactly what you think.
Very transactional.
They enjoy...
They enjoy spending other people's money.
Even Republicans have an addiction problem.
They're addicted to spending other people's money.
And I think that Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy are the intervention that this town needed.
And I think that we need to be checked in to a rehab.
And I think that Donald Trump and these guys are going to check us in if we don't clean ourselves up.
Political rehab for politicians, that's pretty good.
I actually have always said we need to set up a plastic little tykes politics for Democrats because these people shouldn't be taken seriously when you think men can be women and all the other garbage that they try to make other people believe culturally.
We need to give them like a plastic DC where they can go pretend.
Kind of like you might, for your daughters, you might give them a little...
Little Tykes Kitchen with the little oven and everything.
So you know they're not going to burn themselves or cut themselves with a plastic knife.
But they get to pretend to play kitchen and they get to pretend bake a turkey and everything else.
But everything's safe.
We kind of need one of those for Democrats, maybe politicians in general.
But Little Tykes Kitchen, Little Tykes DC for Democrats, we'd probably be a lot better off.
You know, I'll say this.
I've seen the Republican Party come a long way.
As far as it used to be a voice like yours would be a voice in the wilderness, a lone wolf out there.
There are a lot of men that speak like you now.
They speak like us.
They speak like the average American people.
And so with what you said in the beginning, I agree.
If we can stop this bill, that will be a major victory.
And we don't need to lament over the government shutdown.
I think that they're clearly huddling up, trying to go back to the drawing board.
And so we'll find out probably later tonight or tomorrow what's going on.
But I think that it's a huge win for the American people if we can finally stop the Christmas omnibus You know, that we have seen every year, year after year after year.
If we can finally stop that, it'll be a Christmas miracle.
And I think it would be a major shift in the attitude of Congress and the American people.
And I mean, look, let's just be honest.
Elon Musk throwing his weight around, X being a free speech platform.
Representatives like you doing the media rounds, that has played a major impact, and now the bill is virtually dead on arrival, and Johnson has two days, essentially, to circle the wagons and see if he can do anything.
But I don't see any omnibus bill.
I don't see any CR passing.
So what do you think is the likely scenario here on Wednesday night?
They took this continuing resolution and then they started adding some other provisions to it, which opened up the door for other things, which opened up the door for other things.
And before you know it, you have this monstrosity of a bill.
One of the provisions, for example, that is politically popular up here, but is an absolute ridiculous bill, It would be horrific for the healthcare industry, and that is they have pharmacy benefit manager language in this.
And, you know, that's a complicated topic.
Most people, I don't think many members of Congress even know what a pharmacy benefit manager does or what they are.
They just know that pharmacists don't like them, and they know that pharma doesn't like them.
Well, a pharmacy benefit manager is what Your insurance company uses to negotiate down the prices of drugs from big pharma.
Otherwise, Pfizer and these companies are going to charge whatever they can.
Somebody has to negotiate and be the bad guy.
Go in the room and And negotiate.
This bill is kneecapping the pharmacy benefit managers and their ability to negotiate down drug pricing.
And the pharma lobbyists are dancing in the streets here in DC. This will be a $50 billion win for the pharmaceutical industry.
All right, so there you have it, ladies and gentlemen.
A bit of an update there from Capitol Hill.
I mean, mostly good news, I would say.
Mostly good news.
You could argue we, the people, have defeated this bill.
And the...
Members of Congress on the Republican side that are actually willing to put their foot down.
It's nice to see a change of pace there.
Looks like have defeated this bill as well.
Now, before we hit this end of the hour break, this is the statement from Donald Trump just released.
I will read this for you now.
From the office of Trump and Vance.
The most foolish and inept thing ever done by congressional Republicans was allowing our country to hit the debt ceiling in 2025. It was a mistake and is now something that must be addressed.
Meanwhile, Congress is considering a spending bill that would give sweetheart provisions for government censors and for Liz Cheney.
The bill would make it easier to hide the records of the corrupt January 6th committee which accomplished nothing for the American people and hid security failures that happened that day.
This bill would also give Congress a pay increase while many Americans are struggling this Christmas.
Increasing the debt ceiling is not great, but we'd rather do it on Biden's watch.
If Democrats won't cooperate on the debt ceiling now, what makes anyone think they would do it in June during our administration?
Let's have this debate now, and we should pass a streamlined spending bill that doesn't give Chuck Schumer and the Democrats everything they want.
Republicans want to support our farmers, pay for disaster relief, and set up our country for success in 2025. The only way to do that is with a temporary funding bill without Democrat giveaways combined with an increase in the debt ceiling.
Anything else is a betrayal of our country.
Republicans must get smart and tough.
If Democrats threaten to shut down the government unless we give them everything they want, then call their bluff.
It is Schumer and Biden who are holding up aid to our farmers and disaster relief.
This chaos would not be happening if we had a real president.
We will in 32 days.
Strong close from Donald Trump.
And a strong close to the second hour of the InfoWars war room.
We go into the third hour now.
There is a crazy story happening.
You may have seen this, but there's a new app that leftists have gone to that kind of mimics X, but they don't want to be on X, called Blue Sky.
All right, again, we got a crazy story coming up on this new app for leftists, Blue Sky.
They all left X after the Trump victory as a coping mechanism.
But then what's been going on on Blue Sky is some crazy stuff.
Wait till you hear this coming up with a special guest.
Quickly, as just a little buffer here, Aaron Rodgers, who they're about to release a documentary on with his use and promotion of ayahuasca, Interestingly enough, he was on the Pat McAfee show with his normal segment break.
And I guess he's been getting attacked by some other members in the media, some leftists in the sports media.
So, you know, he figured we should have a PSA. Before anybody wants to attack you, there should be a PSA so that the people can know who you really are.
Here's his idea in clip five.
unidentified
That's BSA. That's a good PSA. It's catchy.
I know I gotta say this multiple times for people because they don't listen, but say whatever the you want about me, I don't care.
But just before you do it, whether you state your name, Your accolades, pronouns, whatever it is, just state your VAC status so that anything you say afterwards gets put in the right light.
Just get it out there.
Because then when you say things about me, people can at least be like, oh, you are...
Captured by the multi-billion dollar propagandist, and you're still upset about it.
Just put that in there, just so everybody knows where you're coming from.
Everybody knows, okay, cool.
You're twice vaxxed Moderna with three booster shots, and then boom, boom, boom.
Say what you want to say.
Whatever.
I don't care.
I'm just saying a PSA, just please help everybody out who's wondering, where is this coming from?
Including myself.
What the f*** is this coming from?
But just give it a little PSA. You do a little bit of digging, then you know where it's all coming from.
You're captured, you're highly vaccinated, and Then say whatever the hell you want to say about me, because I couldn't give two s*** about it.
All I care about is that you put that little disclaimer out there, just like it's in the bottom for me that I'm a champ, you know, MVP, and I am enthusiastic about ayahuasca.
Just put, you know, instead of your accolades that you need to have out there, That was a direct shot to a certain sports commentator who does that.
You know, my favorite part about those clips when Aaron Rodgers just goes all in against the pharmaceutical industry and the vaccines, my favorite part is when you can see Pat McAfee just cringing.
Just like, oh no, what is he going to say?
You can see him, he's getting antsy, he's kind of worming around.
You can see him cringing.
But I also, I think it's a good idea.
When your mainstream media fake news reading, teleprompter reading ninny is up there, you know, it should say at the bottom, you know, four times vaccinated.
Five times boosted.
That's a good idea, actually.
It'll really put...
Aaron Rodgers is on to something here.
It will put things into perspective.
It will put things into light.
It's like, yeah, okay, I'm an NFL player, Super Bowl champ, MVP winner, ayahuasca enthusiast.
Okay, you're a...
CNN host, field reporter, Pulitzer Prize winner, and five times vaxxed and boosted for COVID. It's a brilliant idea.
It will really put the proper context into everything else you're going to say after that.
I mean, they're the ones that wanted us running around with vaccine passports.
So go ahead, put it up there.
Oh, you're five times vaxxed for COVID?
Oh, your opinion really means a lot.
unidentified
Oh, your opinion really your opinion really means a lot.
actually, I'm thinking now, too, maybe we should add this to my bottom line.
When you guys put up my name key, maybe add zero times vaxxed to that as well.
Can we do that?
Can we get zero times vaxxed?
That's all time.
Those are all time stats, by the way.
Zero times vaxxed.
I like what Aaron Rodgers is on to there.
All right.
Joining me now is Alex Rosen, the Predator poacher.
And this is just an incredible development to me.
And I wanted to get his take on it because he's obviously out there dealing with it on the front lines.
The guy's numbers when it comes to catching Predators are already prolific.
I'm not sure.
He was probably putting up the biggest numbers right now in the game.
And I follow him.
But what I noticed was...
Once the left launched this new app called Blue Sky, or maybe it's been around, I'm not sure exactly, but all the leftists left X and went to Blue Sky to cope with the Trump victory.
So it's just filled with leftists over there.
It's basically X for leftists.
And so Alex decided to go on there and start...
Using his predator poaching mechanisms, strategies, on Blue Sky.
And he's hitting record numbers right now.
I mean, every time I open his account, it's a new Blue Sky predator.
And so I sent him a message and I said, hey, what's the deal with this?
Is this thing just loaded up with predators on Blue Sky?
So I had to get him on to explain this to you, what's going on.
Alex, I've noticed ever since you started utilizing Blue Sky to catch predators, your numbers are through the roof.
Well, you're more likely to find a pet on Blue Sky than trash in India.
That's how bad it is on Blue Sky.
We made an account the other day.
I've been banned a couple times.
We made a fake account of an adult posing as a pedo, and within an hour of the account being made, 20 accounts hit us up, all interested in trading child pornography or inquiring about kids they think we had.
I mean, it's so easy to just find accounts on there, and most of the accounts On Blue Sky are all anonymous, but, I mean, we've done five busts on Blue Sky, and two of them have been sex offenders, and all five of them were trading child pornography as young as babies and toddlers.
Of course I expect there to be pedos because every app has pedos, but the ratio of pedos to users on Blue Sky I think is probably the highest out of any social media platform, and it's not even close.
And the thing about the Blue Sky pedos is, yeah, like say on Facebook, we get a lot of like the boomers in the trailers that aren't really too child porn connected.
They're just kind of...
You know, messaging whoever messages them.
But the ones on Blue Sky specifically are very into underage.
Like, we were posing as a dad of an 11-year-old, and we had this accountant hit us up, and he's like, how old's your daughter?
I'm like, oh, 11. And the guy's like, oh, that's way too young.
I'm sorry, that's way too old for me.
And their preference is like little, little, little.
And just the sheer prevalence of that on Blue Sky, I haven't seen anywhere else.
Well, I'd say even the pedos on there are liberals.
Because the gay community on Blue Sky, the gay pedo community is a lot bigger than the straight pedo community on Blue Sky.
I don't know why it's so unmoderated on there, but they're all just blatantly displaying that they're a quote-unquote minor attracted person putting the little map in their bio, like the map emoji in their bio, and they're just blatantly advertising apps they trade child pornography on.
And I think Blue Skies either wants users or just doesn't care too much about pedophilia.
Maybe the owners think it's like a conspiracy theory that it happens, and they just kind of let it go relatively untouched.
Well, I mean, it's just because pedophilia in itself is common.
I mean, we have 300-something million people in this country, and if there is a couple million pedos, I mean, they're going to go on the same apps that we're decoying on.
So, I mean, they're just attracted to it.
And especially on Blue Sky, I mean, we've been posing as an adult with kids, and that just attracts all of these people.
So, I don't know why it's just so many of them.
I don't know why it's just everywhere, but, you know, it just is what it is.
And a lot of the people we've got, I mean, two out of five of them were sex offenders that were convicted, like, in the past two years, immediately outdoing it again.
Well, and this is what I've just learned from being inside of the BOP. It's well known when you go through the system.
The justice system, for whatever reason, you've seen this at the local level, they treat...
Pedophiles, they treat child abusers with really light touch.
Kid gloves, no pun intended.
Whereas you can have some of the most heinous crimes charged against you with children, and you'll get a small sentence They'll start you in a low-security prison, whereas if you don't have any violent record, but let's say you got caught with maybe a pound of marijuana or something, you'll get started at a medium-security prison and you'll get years, whereas child abusers will start at a low and get a couple months.
So do you think it's the lack of serious punishment maybe is why they get back out and just go right back in?
A lot of them get arrested on the spot, but, you know, that county, whatever county Wichita, Kansas is in, the DA is very hesitant to pick up cases like ours.
So, I mean, we got him with child pornography, too, but, I mean, it's a shame that he wasn't arrested on the spot.
Well, you know, in a place like Kansas, where the law states, as long as they believe it to be an underage kid, it doesn't indicate who the underage kid has to be.
I don't understand the hesitancy, especially when it's a sex offender admitting everything on camera.
We're willing to give up our phone.
We're willing to give all of our account logins.
We have all the evidence, say, from A to Z. I don't understand the hesitancy with that.
I think it's a combination of egos or just maybe...
What we're doing is new to that DA. I have no idea.
But, you know, that being said, there's tons of places like we caught another sex offender.
Pat Judd just passed a trip.
He drove from Mascuta, Illinois to Benton, Illinois, which Franklin County, the state's attorney there, Abigail Dinn, she is one of the best people I've ever met just in general.
And she doesn't give plea deals to sex offenders.
She tells us, bring all the people you can to her county.
She will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.
So it's like a give and take.
You got people like her and you got people that are just cowards.
So are you saying it could be a strategy for you to lure people into a district where you know the district attorney is going to be more willing to prosecute?
So initially I told Patrick Judge that I lived in Pontoon Beach, which is right by St. Louis.
And then I realized, like, wait a second, Benton is only an hour from him.
So I was like, oh, I got a property in Benton.
And he goes to Benton.
And so he was on the registry for child pornography.
He only got eight months in prison for, or eight months in jail for it, rather.
And he goes all the way to...
Benton, Illinois, and he gets...
I was on the phone with the prosecutor before he even showed up, and she was like, yeah, I'm going to charge him with this off the bat, and if he has child porn, I'm going to get him for that, too.
And now he's facing 31 years, and she's not going to aim for anything less than 31 years.
So just him getting caught in the wrong place an hour away is a difference between...
It's a 31 times harder sentence than his initial sentence, so...
Well, the common factor among them before the bust is that it doesn't matter if they've been caught one time previously, if they've never been caught previously.
They're just so not careful with how they operate.
I mean, they just don't understand no for an answer.
They don't understand they can't do it.
Like, there's no lessons learned with these people.
Like, if they do 20 years in prison versus no time in jail, the chances of them reoffending, I think, are the same.
I mean, we caught a guy...
In Ohio, James Bryan Sattler in like 2021, he had 20 years from impregnating his own daughter.
And like a couple weeks ago, he hits up the same decoy account that we caught him with in 2021. He only got like barely any time for like a probation violation or something because of us.
But he hit up the same exact decoy, the same exact voice.
Maybe he just didn't remember.
That's how he got in trouble.
But he hit us up a couple weeks ago again.
So there's...
They just have something broken in them that they don't understand a barrier.
And it's past them being attracted to kids.
It's not like they're attracted to kids and just know not to do it.
It's like they have a hunger that just normal people wouldn't have.
Well, you can't even imagine when you've kind of just given up all decency when you engage in that type of behavior and then you just you're addicted to it.
And like I mean, a lot of them play victim very easily about things.
Like, I keep going back to Patrick Judge, because he was just a prime example of this.
He was talking about how he needs to return to God, which, yeah, absolutely.
And I don't know if God would accept you, but, you know, that's up to him.
But he was talking about needing to return to God, and he described the urge to, or the The difficulty to just not watch child porn and try to have sex with 11-year-old girls as God giving him a tough battle to fight.
And he's like, I don't want to fight the toughest battles anymore.
He was crying to us saying that.
So, I mean, they just don't really have a sense of self-awareness that other people might have.
I mean, I'm not saying there's not feds trying to do the right thing, doing their job.
I mean, it takes all of us, but say there's like 50 teams doing what I do, and the feds are there.
I mean, the ratio of that to actual kids online is super, super low.
I mean, shoot, Pat Judge was talking about how he was talking to a 13-year-old trans kid in Oregon, quote-unquote trans kid in Oregon, and from what he was saying, it was all legit.
Like, this kid, he was getting nudes from this kid and just exploiting whatever it was to the max.
Yeah, it's very easy for them to find kids, and it is truly a game of Russian roulette they play online.
He was bisexual, so pretty much anything to him was kind of okay as long as he was underage.
And he specifically told me that that kid in Oregon ran away from his parents Or I guess her, I think it's a biological female, her parents multiple times.
And, you know, they absolutely take advantage of that.
They absolutely take advantage of fractured parental relationships, which kind of go hand in hand with trans ideology.
Well, so I always try to tiptoe around that with them.
So we caught Jordan Burke in Tyler, Texas yesterday, and we interviewed him for like two hours, and he admitted to talking to who he thought was an 11-year-old girl and to watching child pornography, but not nearly as much as I thought or I think he watches.
But the only reason I caught him at work is because I didn't have his actual address, but I knew where he worked.
And he was a nurse at this bio plasma center or whatever.
And, you know, his co-workers were kind of letting him talk, letting him talk to me.
And they I think they heard him on his little microphone thing.
But, you know, I don't fully tell the co-workers what's going on until after the fact, because the pedos look at it.
If I'm not telling the co-workers, they look at me as a sign of goodwill.
Like, look, man, if I was trying to screw you over, wouldn't that be the first thing I do to you?
So that makes him kind of want to talk to me a little bit more.
But then obviously, you know, we called the cops and he's currently booked in Smith County Jail.
So that was another repeat offender, Axel Rualis in Dover, New Jersey.
He got charged with what we had on him.
And, you know, he said to the decoy that he was a barber and said where he worked, and he wanted this 14-year-old girl to take the train right by his barber shop.
So, you know, we called the barber shop, and, you know, I don't have any hair left.
Well, I mean, it's hard to find a pedo with gainful employment, so I don't know if that's in the cards, but if there's a pedo with an actual job that we can go into and schedule something, I mean, best believe I'm going to do it again.
I mean, I love the humiliation factor on top of the arrest, so...
So I would guess the amount of arrests we have is close to three hundred, but that being said, In 2019, 2020, we didn't take it as seriously, I guess you could say, as we should have.
A lot of it was just us chasing them around Walmart in Houston, not really calling the cops.
But then in 2021, that's when we figured out, all right, if we call the cops, do this the right way, we can actually start getting arrests.
So the percentage after 2021 is a lot better than in total.
Well, yeah, certainly you kind of learn some different tricks of the trade, if you will, like getting in the right district, knowing the right tactics.
And then I guess even to a certain extent, Maybe having the right messages or the right words or admittance on tape or in a thing to present to police, too.
So a lot of times they take plea deals, but I mean, I've had days where I've had to be at three different places at once, three different states, and a lot of it gets continued.
But yeah, I get summoned all the time for court.
But usually last minute the predators kind of like cuck out and are like, I'm taking a plea.
I wonder, do you think they'll really be so bold to run another pandemic?
When Trump gets in, but of course the real fear would be that they would actually release a severely deadly virus, a hemorrhagenic virus, make you bleed out of your ears, your eyes.
One, that you have liberals and progressives mad about Eric Adams saying that.
It's mostly younger liberal progressives.
But they're mad that he would dare say that.
And then, they're mad that he would dare stand up for the healthcare CEO. It's true insanity.
But what's funny is in a lot of these leftist complaints from these liberal commentators, they're then saying, hey, Eric, why don't you deal with the crime rates in New York City?
Why don't you deal with the gun crimes in New York City?
Why don't you deal with the taxes and the high rents in New York City?
Wow, you mean all the Democrat problems that you vote for?
Zero self-awareness.
Where do we stand on the Mangione thing, by the way?
Did he do it?
Was he a patsy?
Where do we stand on that?
Just a crazy story.
You don't even know.
It's just the whole thing is nuts.
Meanwhile, in California, despite California spending $24 billion on homelessness since 2019, homelessness has increased.
What do you know?
The government steals your money and then throws it at a problem, and then the problem gets worse.
How effective are California's homelessness programs?
Audit finds that the state hasn't even been keeping track.
They don't even monitor it.
They don't even try.
They just steal money and then give it to their friends.
Billions of dollars.
Billions.
And then Gavin Newsom has the nerve to come out to the press and say this in clip one.
California is a leader in government efficiency, according to Gavin Newsom.
He was doge before there was doge.
The state that runs at a deficit.
The state that has lost tens of billions of dollars on homelessness and the issue is worse than ever.
The state that gives free money to illegal immigrants, non-citizens, even for Christmas travel.
And he was doge before doge.
I mean, that is just crazy.
That is just insane.
And he says it to the media, and they just sit there and take it.
I mean, they should be laughing out loud at that.
He should be laughed out of the press conference for such a ridiculous claim.
Ridiculous.
Let's see what happens when Donald Trump cuts federal funding to California.
State's going to go bankrupt.
But, oh, he was...
California's government, we are does.
We are so efficient.
Oh, yeah.
Okay, buddy.
Let's see how that goes for you.
Did you remember, we were covering this a couple weeks ago in Houston, they wanted to give out free money?
You know, that guaranteed income thing?
It's being blocked now.
Harris County's new guaranteed income program put on hold after previous Texas block...
And, of course, it's Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton who first sued to stop the original program, Uplift Harris, Harris County, Houston, a pilot program that allowed low-income households to receive $500 a month for 18 months.
The Paxton office says it first sued to stop the program in April, arguing that it violated the state constitution's prohibition on granting public money to individuals.
So they're suing again, despite, here she goes again, Judge Lena Hidalgo, one of the most corrupt in the country.
Then, Harris County Judge Lena Hidalgo, why is she even involved in this?
Revamped it to give select families who live at or below 200% of the federal poverty line preloaded debit cards with restrictions on what be bought with debt.
Parents Unveil School Assignment Controversy00:03:42
There's still a lot of mystery as far as what caused this shooter in Madison, Wisconsin to go to their school and kill people.
But we are learning more.
Madison school shooter Natalie Rupnow was in therapy for most of her childhood.
So there's still a lot of gray area here.
And...
For whatever reason, the cops seem hesitant on even talking about gender.
But clearly we see that there were problems here.
And once again, the one issue that nobody wants to talk about, which is probably the number one issue, what pharmaceutical drugs was the shooter on?
What pharmaceutical drugs?
Never, never do we get that information.
Never do we make the big story about that.
Never do we correlate the pharmaceutical products with the mass shootings.
Never.
And yeah, you know what, there might be some political issues there, some cultural issues there, where we've had this new trend of trans shooters.
But what is the role of the pharmaceutical drugs?
Nobody wants to make the big story there.
I wonder, maybe RFK should really lean into that in this next upcoming administration.
Same with Donald Trump.
Somebody just needs to say it.
Just say it, and let's have that conversation.
Because it needs, it's long overdue.
It is long overdue.
Now, a creepy message.
This is Stephen Baldwin, the stepfather of Justin Bieber, And with all the Diddy situation, you know, rumors and everything else, accusations, the Diddy parties, of course, Bieber was involved with Diddy at a very young age, very awkward videos of the two, and Bieber is a minor.
And now this is Justin Bieber's stepfather, Stephen Baldwin, put this cryptic, I'm sorry, what did I say?
But obviously people are looking at that and saying, well, that's certainly strange.
Now, in Pennsylvania, they have just, they just did a press conference announcing it and it's official now.
Pennsylvania begins rolling out race-based grants for businesses not available for whites.
From the Shapiro Davis administration, they're opening a historically disadvantaged business assistance program to support and empower small businesses across Pennsylvania.
Governor Josh Shapiro's bipartisan 2024-25 budget includes funding for small, diverse businesses, diverse, diverse, that have historically been denied access to social or economic opportunity, including minority-owned that have historically been denied access to social or economic opportunity, through the Historically Disadvantaged Business Assistance Program.
So don't bother if you're white.
Now, this is what, so, first of all, this is illegal, 100% illegal.
Based off a recent Supreme Court decision, we'll show that in a second.
So what they do with this crap, and this is the diversity, equity, and inclusion crap that's taken over everywhere, that is now finally being rejected.
So now you are a business owner and you can't get access to loans or other tax benefits or grants or any of this other stuff unless you hire non-whites.
So they make it like a carrot dangling on a string for small businesses, whatever, and they say, hey, don't hire white people.
Hire minorities, hire diverse, gay, trans, whatever.
Just do not hire a white person, specifically a white man, specifically a heterosexual white man.
That's bad.
So you lose the meritocracy.
And you lose the hardest working person, the best person for the job, the most experienced, the best abilities, all of that.
You lose that because now you have to hire someone based off of their identity, based off of their skin color.
And then they promote it with benefits like they're doing in Pennsylvania.
This is 100% illegal.
A white-owned business should sue Pennsylvania.
If there is a small business owner in Pennsylvania listening to this, I would hire an attorney and I would sue Pennsylvania and I would take them to the Supreme Court over this.
Because it is illegal.
And remember, it was this Supreme Court that decided you can't discriminate based off of race.
Go figure.
Like they were doing in college.
Acceptance.
So this is already being felt.
Black student enrollment at Harvard Law drops by more than half.
So once they got rid of affirmative action and diversity acceptance standards, now if you're, it's mostly Asians or whites that get denied here, but now it's who has the best grades?
Who has the best resume?
Who has the best extracurricular activities?
Who has the best recommendations?
The most honors?
It's on merit again.
Isn't that something?
But of course, now they're saying, oh, look at how racist it is.
Now, now Harvard Law doesn't take black students anymore.
It's racist.
I mean, yeah, because nobody...
Think about how insulting this is, too.
Like a black American can't make it into Harvard?
Without some race-based affirmative action program?
Think about how insulting that is.
So on top of it just being inherently racist, it's also insulting to black people saying, hey, you can't get in unless we give you this stuff.
So extremely rude, extremely racist, but it is illegal.
So the Supreme Court ruled it's illegal.
Now they're doing it in Pennsylvania.
If I had a small business...
As a white man, I'd be suing.
I'd be suing Pennsylvania.
Here's a little comic relief for you.
CNN Democrat Julie Rozinski claims there is no such thing as anti-Trump media.
Can you believe that?
unidentified
Clip 6. What media are you talking about that's anti-Trump?
And she's about to say how we've taken over, yeah, with the alternative media, with truth-telling media, not big corporate anti-Trump media like CNN. You know, I'm out of time for today, but there's a big issue.
Senator Randy Fine, who's trying to become a member of Congress, has an Israeli flag hoisted the highest, higher than the American flag, in his office.
And he posts this picture on his ex-account and receives a ton of backlash.
And he says, oh, he did it on purpose, he says.
He says, what's funny is that the Jew-haters and Muslim terror-lovers, they always love playing these words, no, we just don't like you flying a foreign flag in our country and higher than the American flag, actually.
We have a problem with that.
It has nothing to do with Jew-hating or Muslim-loving, actually, at all.
He says, he did it to trigger you.
He did it to trigger you.
Interesting play.
You're saying, as an American citizen, as an American government official, as an American representative, that you fly a foreign country's flag to trigger people and that's funny?
Americans shouldn't be upset over a foreign flag flying higher than the American flag when you're in the American government?
The U.S. government?
A U.S. official?
You also have Brian Mast being confronted in the Capitol for being an Israeli spy.
This issue is getting really interesting, folks, and they can't just call you a name to get rid of it.
We don't like foreign flags being flown in our Capitol and we don't like foreign country controlling our Congress.
There are three things that don't hang themselves.
Drywall, Christmas tree lights, and Jeffrey Epstein.
Ladies and gentlemen, the globalists are in free fall.
Their entire criminal operation is collapsing.
Trump is officially going after the Biden administration for the criminal human trafficking We're going to take control January 20th, and people are going to be held accountable.
While you're there, believe me, If you love our information, you're going to love the supplements like Ultimate Sea Moss.
That is the ultimate superfood.
It's the strongest, one of the strongest out there.
We get it from a top supplier.
It's private label.
It is super strong.
The equivalent of 40 grams per serving.
That's two capsules of sea moss with the very best organic iodine, the very best vitamin minerals.
It's a superfood of superfoods for a reason.
Get your Ultimate CMOS discounted and a lot more.
On top of the current regular sales, there are sales on top of it of 30 to 40% off.
Part of this Black Friday last week, all through Cyber Week right now for at least another week or so.
So take advantage of the mega sales at thealkshowstore.com.
And while you're getting some of the Christmas sweaters, Please try the Ultimate CMOS. The other supplements are great as well, but I know if you try this, the energy, the focus, the libido, the stamina for the immune system, I am so addicted to it.
I'd heard about CMOS being a superfood, our CMOS namely, but the folks would quickly say, you're recommending all these supplements and that's great.
Kind of got your vitamin and fusion with electrolytes, that's HydroForce and a great gut cleanse and a great probiotic and Energy gummies and sleep gummies.
Those are all great, Mr. Jones, but those are great guys.
They're so respectful.
They're like, but have you looked at the CMOS? We've got one of the top suppliers that'll let us private label it.
And I looked at it and I was like, oh my God, this is the superfood other than maybe hemp.
But it does other effects than hemp.
So get your Irish CMOS and so much more right now at thealexjonesstore.com and everybody needs to be a VIP. You get $40 to spend in the store each month for being a member for $30.
So if you're going to support, you got to do that and you get other special deals, other free gifts and so much more.
So go to thealexjonesstore.com forward slash VIP or click on the red link at the top and become a VIP member.
Cancel any time.
Thank you so much for your support.
It's an exciting time to be alive.
Pretty dangerous for me and Trump, but we wouldn't be anywhere else.
Thanks for keeping me and President Trump in the fight.
God bless and good luck.
Oh, and I almost forgot.
Merry, Merry Christmas to everybody.
That's so triggering to the left, but I also love Christmas.