Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 29, 2024 - War Room - Owen Shroyer

02:38:52

Election Lawfare! Democrats Sue In Multiple States to Keep Ineligible Voters on the Rolls, Block Drop Box Surveillance, and Send Early Voters Home Before They Vote!

Source

Participants

Main voices

mark mitchell

22:36

megan barth

13:22

owen shroyer

01:27:29

Appearances

alex jones

04:59

Clips

daniel goldman

00:23

jesse watters

00:57

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		The silent majority is no longer silent.
		This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
		Please stand by for further details.
		We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Ladies and gentlemen, it's Tuesday, October 29th, 2024.
		This is the InfoWars War Room, your election headquarters.
		And yes, we have massive election news today.
		We might be still a week away from election day, but the election is happening right now as we speak.
		And the real election is being determined in the courts.
		Not at the ballot box.
		As we have been warning right here on this show for months, and it is now all coming to fruition.
		We have multiple court decisions today that we're going to be covering in multiple swing states.
		Nevada, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Michigan, Georgia.
		With a week till the election...
		The court battles are on.
		And there's plenty of things we can complain about the Republicans as far as the lack of action, but this is all Democrats taking action while the election is ongoing with a week till election day.
		It's total insanity what's going on.
		And then there's even wilder developments actually at the polling locations in Pennsylvania.
		And I gotta say, the whole thing is suspicious.
		The whole thing is suspicious because it shouldn't be this difficult.
		It shouldn't be this difficult.
		You shouldn't be waiting in lines for hours to vote.
		And you'd think early voting, it wouldn't be as bad.
		Apparently, it's worse.
		Now, I early voted in Austin today, in Texas, run by Republicans.
		Barely, in fact, no issue.
		The only issue is that the little sticker they give you says, Yo Vote, like I'm in Mexico or something.
		No English stickers.
		It's all in Spanish.
		But other than that, Perfectly smooth approach.
		Took like 10 minutes.
		That's it.
		I scouted a couple other early voting locations.
		Barely any lines.
		Talked to a couple people, said, yeah, they had to wait in lines, but they went to like downtown voting locations.
		So why is it that in these Democrat-run states, or in these major swing states, it's like voting is such a painful process?
		Aside from that, we'll look at that, and we'll look at some videos coming out of Pennsylvania and some reports.
		These court decisions are what ultimately might be determining this election, and it's happening right now.
		And then there's more statements from Donald Trump on the issue, as he had a press conference earlier today at Mar-a-Lago.
		He's got a rally upcoming, probably getting on the stage any moment now.
		He's going to be doing an interview with Sean Hannity later tonight.
		I mean, he's peddled to the metal here.
		And then there's the Harris campaign, which is kind of flopping around like a fish out of water.
		But We're going to follow up with some of the results that we see in early voting and some of the misconceptions that people have based on the results.
unidentified		And look, I get it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You want to win.
		I want to win.
		You want to feel good about it.
		You want to have a good time.
		That's fine.
		I'm here for the vibes too.
		I'm here for a good time.
		But we got to be real, ladies and gentlemen.
		Not everything here is rainbows and unicorns.
		And yeah, you can follow the people out there that love to grift and love to clout chase.
		And love to just do pro-Trump, pro-Trump, pro-Trump and get a following.
		That's fine.
		That's not what we do here.
		We give you the real story here.
		So yeah, you might not like it.
		Hey, you know, I could sit here and say, the Dodgers are beating the Yankees 3-0 in the World Series.
		Oh, gee, you're a doom and gloomer.
		You're a black pillar.
		That's depressing.
		Well, that's what's going on.
		So that's not blackpilling.
		That's not doom and gloom.
		That's the reality of the situation.
		So you want the reality of what's going on in the election?
		This is where you go, right here.
		Can you feel it?
		I mean, really, can you?
		You're six days and eight hours away from election day.
		And the election is already ongoing.
		And I'm going to show you some numbers today.
		That are going to tell you the real story.
		And I'm going to show you some of the alternative story.
		I'm going to show you the real story.
		And we're going to back it all up with the numbers and put it all into perspective for you today.
		Before I get into the numbers, let's look at some of these legal decisions that are happening right now in swing states.
		And there's so much of this, and I've got two big guests coming on today as well.
		That I can't even cover all of it, quite frankly.
		Even in a three-hour show, it's impossible to cover all these developments.
		But let's start digging in.
		Republicans ask U.S. Supreme Court to block counting of some provisional ballots in Pennsylvania.
		So it's at the Supreme Court level now.
		Less than a week to go, and now we're getting to the Supreme Court.
		They're not going to rule on this.
		And traditionally speaking...
		The Supreme Court doesn't want to get involved in elections.
		A dispute over provisional ballots.
		Well, what if the provisional ballot is flawed?
		What if it doesn't have all the right background checks and all this other stuff?
		Well, the Democrats say they should still count.
		And then they say they should also count.
		So if you come and file a provisional ballot, even though you've sent in a mail-in ballot, you can say, well, I think there was a mistake with the mail-in ballot, or I don't know, maybe it went missing.
		So you can have a provisional ballot.
		Who knows?
		You could be voting twice!
		This whole thing is a joke!
		So you get a provisional ballot, you get a mail-in ballot.
		RNC asked the Supreme Court for emergency order.
		In Pennsylvania mail ballot case, the RNC asked the Supreme Court for an emergency order that would prevent Pennsylvania, whose mail ballots are rejected for technical reasons, from having a provisional ballot counted.
		The Pennsylvania top court ruled 4-3 that state law gives impacted male voters an opportunity to still participate by showing up at their polling place in person on election day.
		You get a mail-in vote, you get a provisional vote, you get to show up, you get to...
		This mail-in voting is a joke.
		It's a joke.
		The fact that we have mail-in voting in this country is pathetic.
		It's an embarrassment.
	The RNC argues the ruling misreads the state law, which states a provisional ballot shall not be counted if a voter's mail ballot was timely received.
	The RNC's attorneys wrote, when the legislature says that certain ballots can never be counted, a state court cannot blue pencil that clear command into always, and here the General Assembly could not have been clearer.
	They've already had a million and a half mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania.
	It's the Democrat vote Viagra before the election even starts.
	So you get a mail-in ballot.
	You get a provisional ballot.
	Who knows?
	Maybe they all get to count.
	Maybe they'll count them if Kamala's behind.
	It's just, hey, let's just screw up the system.
	Let's just make it as complex and difficult as possible so that we have all these different ways to maneuver the final results.
	And of course, you know what that means.
	You know what that means.
	Pennsylvania appeals voting ruling to Supreme Court hours after Virginia made its own ask.
	So the Democrats are trying to shut this down.
	Again, the RNC lawyers say this case is of paramount public importance, potentially affecting tens of thousands of votes in a state which many anticipate could be divisive in control of the U.S. Senate or even the 2024 presidential election.
	They're asking for this case to be decided by Friday.
	Republicans claimed in their emergency appeal that Pennsylvania's highest court usurped power reserved to the state legislature.
	Oh, that's what happened in 2020 as well.
unidentified		Funny.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		By allowing voters to cast provisional ballots after their mail-in ballots were tossed out.
		When the legislature says that certain ballots can never be counted, a state court cannot blue pencil that clear command into always.
		The Pennsylvania Supreme Court recently created a rule out of thin air subverting state law to allow erroneous mail-in ballots to be counted via provisional voting.
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, just like what they did in Wisconsin at the Supreme Court where the Democrats control it, they rule in favor of the Democrats, they give themselves a window of opportunity To cheat.
		To have fraudulent ballots.
		To have fraudulent results.
		And that's exactly what goes on in these states, and I'll prove it.
		We'll even look at Pennsylvania coming up.
		Don't worry, we've got the numbers to back it up.
		Let's continue with the lawfare here.
		Virginia appeals to Supreme Court to reverse judges' ruling, putting potential non-citizens back on the voter rolls.
		Oh yeah, remember that story?
		These are not going to get ruled on by the Supreme Court.
		I mean, I doubt it.
		I doubt the Supreme Court wants to get involved in this election with less than a week to go.
		And even if they do, I mean, it's almost like it doesn't even matter.
		The election's already ongoing.
		You've already got millions of votes being filed.
		In Michigan, more than 10% of people have already voted.
unidentified		Supposedly.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		At least that's what the data we have says.
		If you believe it or not, it's up to you.
		Virginia Governor Glenn Youngkin discusses the legal battle in his state and the emergency appeal ahead of Election Day.
		The state of Virginia filed an emergency stay application to the U.S. Supreme Court on Sunday in an 11th hour bid to overturn a lower court ruling that halted its removal of likely non-citizens.
		So you see...
		The Republicans that actually get it and know how to win, like Glenn Youngkin, he's trying to make the right legal moves to protect the vote, and the Democrats come in in the final hours and say, nope, you can't remove non-citizens from the voter rolls.
		I don't know if it will change the result in Pennsylvania or not.
		But let's just put that aside.
		This is what they're doing.
		And they say, well, so in Virginia they say, well, you can't make decisions like this before 90 days until the election, so you can't do this.
		You can't remove the illegal votes with less than 90 days.
		Oh, but then in states like Pennsylvania or Arizona, they say, oh, we can make all kinds of rule changes.
		Yeah, we can change rules with a week till the election if we want to in Pennsylvania.
		If it'll help us, the Democrats.
		But in Virginia, if it hurts the Democrats, we can't change the rules there.
		They have a problem in Michigan, by the way, and they know it.
		Democrat enthusiasm competes with disaffection.
		Yeah, all the polls show Trump is winning Michigan, but he won Michigan in 2016 and then somehow lost it.
		Don't worry, I'll show you what happened there with the numbers coming up soon.
		And they're already defending themselves.
		Michigan doesn't have more active registered voters than residents, except they do.
		Even the story from VoteBeat has to admit it.
		You go on down here, so that's the headline.
		Oh no, there's not more active registered voters than residents.
unidentified		But then you go down here, they have the data.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And they say, people may look at the number of residents 18 and older in Michigan, about 7.9 million, according to the census, and yet, according to the Michigan Secretary of State's office, there are 8.4 million registered voters.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh!
unidentified		Huh.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And they say, people assume that means there's a significant overcount in registered voters.
		Yeah, actually, that's half a million of overcount.
		Is what that is.
		But they say, oh, well, that doesn't mean that they're actively registered.
		Well, yes, it does.
		Okay, so what?
		They've moved out of state.
		They've died.
		So why don't you clear the voter rolls?
		Well, you can't clear the voter rolls before 90 days.
		So there are more active voters than legal voters.
		Well, yeah, but the headline says no.
		See the games they're playing here?
		So why don't you clear the voter rolls of the at least half million?
		They actually go on to say that the Department of State says it's really 7.2 million legal voters.
		So that's actually more than a million of the registered voters.
		So you could have potentially over a million.
		And they do all these things and say, well, it's actually 7.2.
		Again, on the state's office, it says 8.4.
		So that's the real number.
		But, oh, but a lot of people have moved and a lot of people have died, and so they're not really eligible, even though they're still on the rolls, because they won't clear the rolls.
		And then in some states, they say they won't even clear the rolls until 2028!
		So what's going to happen to all those voters that are registered but not active?
		They won't clear them off the rolls.
		The Democrats spend millions of dollars on voter data.
		They are masters at vote harvesting.
		They have the vote mules.
		What happens to those votes?
		And by the way, the reason mostly why, the reason mostly why it went from having a number of 8.4 to 7.2 is because people are fleeing Michigan under the Democrat Party rule.
		Michigan continues to bleed residents.
		Losses to other states doubled in 2023.
		Did you clear the rolls?
		Are you going to make sure that the million-plus that are no longer eligible to vote in Michigan are not going to be voting?
		Are you doing anything to assure us of that, or are you just saying, that's not really a problem?
		So that's what happens.
		And all these Democrat-run states, the Democrats that get in control and people leave in droves.
		California, Michigan, Illinois, New York.
		But, okay, that's aside from the point.
		Let's look at these numbers.
		Now, I've got the early voting numbers, and then we're going to look back in time, and I'm going to show you what's going on here.
		Because I'm a realist, and you're going to get the real story right here.
		Now, North Carolina continues to look good for Trump.
		The numbers continue to come in, even though it's basically a split between Republican, Democrat, and Independent.
		These are good numbers for Trump.
		So, to me, North Carolina, so far with what we know, in the early voting, almost 3 million now, It looks good for Trump.
		Republicans are in the lead.
		Independents are right up there, too.
		And so this looks like it'll be a good result for the Republicans for Trump.
		And then there's Michigan.
		Absentee ballots, 1.6 million now.
		It's almost up to 1.7, which is more than 10%.
		Of the legal vote, I mean, it's probably even closer, what is it, closer to 20?
		If it's 7.2, they say 7.2 million legal registered voters in Michigan and 1.6 are absentee.
		So what are they really saying?
		So these are people that don't live in Michigan that are voting?
		Are these the remaining millions that you're saying don't count in the 8.4 number and it's really 7.2?
		Do you see the discrepancies here?
		So you're either supposed to believe that 1.6 million out of 7.4 million legal voters in Michigan are absentee voting.
		Or the number 8.4 that includes all the people that have left Michigan are still voting there.
		Is it a legal vote?
unidentified		vote?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Are they voting in multiple states?
unidentified		Who's talking about that?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No one.
		Right here.
		And then all the early votes are coming in in all the big blue areas, mainly in Detroit.
		Michigan does not look good, folks.
		And let me show you...
		Well, we'll get into the other numbers of why.
		Explain exactly what's going on here.
		Pennsylvania.
		Now, I got a lot of backlash for this.
		And I hate to say it, but I'm right.
		They're wrong.
		Trump is not winning Pennsylvania.
		You're getting fed a bill of goods by people who are grifting off the Trump movement and who want to just sell you nothing but positive news and not the reality.
		Have there been big swings in Pennsylvania?
		Yes.
		Have there been more registered Republicans than Democrats in Pennsylvania in this election cycle?
		Yes.
		Are the Republicans doing better in early and mail-in voting than they did in 2020?
		Yes.
		Now, will any of that matter?
		Likely not, and I'll show you why.
		But here are the numbers that continue to come in.
		The Democrats' gap has been closed.
		I will admit that.
		These late mail and absentee votes in Pennsylvania, today is the last day for early voting.
		The gap has been closed, but it's still going to be at least probably around 300,000, 400,000 before Election Day even comes, based off of these numbers, the mail and absentee voting.
		Now, early voting is a different story.
		This is just the numbers we have for male and absentee.
		And these numbers are astronomical, by the way.
		These numbers shouldn't even exist, but here we are.
		So yeah, the Republicans are losing badly in Pennsylvania.
		Anybody that tells you otherwise is not being honest.
		And even Elon Musk basically kind of has to check himself on this.
		Yesterday, he said, early votes in Pennsylvania now show Republicans doing 435,000 better than Democrats versus the same time in 2020.
		Biden's margin of victory was only 80,000 in 2020, trending towards a crushing victory.
		He then comes out today and says, that said, there are still far more Democrat than Republican early votes.
		It's just that the in-person Republican vote on Election Day is historically far higher than Democrat.
		Please bring everyone you know to early vote.
		You can request and hand in your ballot in person at your county office.
		Tomorrow is the last day to do so before November 5th.
		Well, that's today is the last day to early vote.
		By the way, there's shenanigans happening today in Pennsylvania.
		We'll tell you all about that coming up.
		But let me explain what's going on here.
		You can sit here and point at the numbers that show Republicans are doing better today than they did in 2020, and that's all fine and good.
		But that wouldn't be the full story.
		And even if you trust all these numbers that are coming in, it's a dead heat.
		It's not a crushing victory.
		It's a dead heat.
		Based off of all the data, Pennsylvania would be a dead heat if you look at it that way.
		But let me tell you what really goes on.
		And let's look at Pennsylvania and Michigan to tell you what really goes on.
		And I don't know why people don't want to talk about it.
		But they don't.
		And it'll tie into another story that shows you why Republicans lose.
		They're breaking news today.
		I'll tease you a little bit, but I'll tell you.
		The Republican Party is breaking news today, guys.
		The Hunter Biden laptop is real.
unidentified		Whoa.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They're breaking that news today, guys.
		I'm not kidding you.
		That's the news they're breaking today.
		Are they talking about the 2020 election?
		No.
		Let me tell you what really goes on.
		So you've just seen all the numbers, but let me show you what's going to happen at the end of the day here, okay?
		Let me tell you what really goes on.
		Let's look at Pennsylvania, shall we?
		2016, Donald Trump wins Pennsylvania with 2.97 million votes.
		2.97 million, Pennsylvania for Donald Trump 2016, compared to Hillary Clinton's 2.92.
		Small margin of victory, about 50,000.
		Trump gets 2.97, Hillary gets 2.92.
		Okay.
		Both under 3 million.
		Now, let's look at 2020, shall we?
		Okay.
		Okay.
		Donald Trump gets 3.37 million votes in Pennsylvania.
		Wow!
		That's an increase of almost half a million.
		Surely he won Pennsylvania, right?
		Wrong!
		Because Joe Biden came in at 3.45 million.
unidentified		Wow!
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Joe Biden got...
		More than half a million votes than Hillary Clinton did.
		More votes than Obama did.
		More votes cast in Pennsylvania ever than in the history of the state.
		And of course, it was the 300,000 that came in for Joe Biden at 3.30 in the morning that flipped the state and ultimately gave it to him.
		All in Pennsylvania.
		All in big box trucks in the middle of the night.
		All on tape.
		Plus all the vote mules.
		So you can sit here and you can talk about all the early numbers and you can talk about all the trends.
		But let me ask you this.
		Let's say Donald Trump increases his votes in Pennsylvania again.
		How many is Kamala going to get?
		Four million?
		Four and a half million?
		Do you really believe that Trump and Biden both got more than three million even though nobody's ever done it?
		Do you really believe that?
		Donald Trump gets 400,000 more votes in Pennsylvania than he did in 2016?
		Biden gets 500,000 more than Hillary?
		Yeah.
		That's how these elections really work, folks.
		How are those numbers for you?
		Should we look at Michigan?
		Donald Trump, 2016, wins Michigan.
		2.27 million votes.
		Hillary Clinton, 2.26 million votes.
		Small margin of victory.
		Right on the edge, but Donald Trump pulled it off with 2.27 million.
		Well, in 2020, Donald Trump got virtually the same number.
		2.64 million.
		But Joe Biden got 2.8.
		And it's the same story.
		They all came into Detroit, the Democrat-run city, at 3.30 in the morning to give him the edge.
		Now, again, if this trend continues and the vote steroids and the vote Viagra happens again, what do you think is going to happen?
		How many people are going to vote for Kamala Harris?
		85?
		90 million?
		How many people in Pennsylvania are going to vote for Kamala Harris?
		4 million?
		How many people in Michigan are going to be voting for Kamala Harris?
		3 million?
		Are we going to see records on top of records on top of records and then sit here and act like it's totally normal?
		Now, we're going to focus on the Nevada story.
		Okay.
		We're going to focus on the Nevada story when we come back with our guest in Nevada, covering Nevada elections, where they're saying, oh, we can count late votes now.
		Oh, cool.
		We can count late votes.
		Awesome.
		Yeah, we'll count them forever.
		Why not?
		But the Atlantic Democrat publication is already priming the pump, and there's other signs out here as well that we'll get to later.
		The next stop the steal movement is here.
		Oh, and I get a nice little mention in here.
		Democrats will be stealing Wisconsin and Michigan.
		Owen Schroyer, the far-right host of the InfoWarshow War Room, said on air last week.
		I'd say that's all but guaranteed at this point.
		He then moved on to question why the results might not be available on election night as they were in years prior to the rise of mail-in ballots.
		And they make sure to correct me here, which take more time to count and process.
		A common right-wing line intended to further call the election's integrity into question.
		The idea is that it's supposedly fishy that votes now take longer to count as though election fraud is something that cannot be done rapidly but must be carefully aged like a delicate French cheese.
		Well, no, when you're behind, when you're losing, then you have to keep counting ballots till you win.
		So thanks for the plug, The Atlantic, but don't worry, I'm not going to be involved in any Stop the Steal movements this year.
		The Democrats already arrested me and put me on probation, so you won't have to worry about me.
		All right, Megan Barth joins me.
	She is from the Nevada Globe, and she is all things expert when it comes to elections in Nevada, and she's been my source on the ground in what...
	I was originally in belief would be the determining state in this election.
	Now I think it'll probably come down to Georgia.
	I think results continue to look good in Nevada.
	But there was a big breaking news story out of Nevada that I want to get her take on.
	Now she's actually in Pennsylvania today.
	So she may want to talk about what's going on in Pennsylvania as well with some big breaking news there and then some shenanigans happening on the ground of the last day for early voting.
	But let me just kind of refresh here and then get Megan's coverage on all of this.
	This was from a week ago.
	Judicial Watch victory.
	Federal appeals court rules against counting of ballots received after Election Day.
	Then the Democrats countersued and got the win.
	And now they say late votes can count in Nevada.
	Late votes can count.
	So, I mean, what does that mean?
	So they'll be counting until 2028?
	I mean, this is a joke.
	So late votes can now count in Nevada.
	The law fair to win this election is ongoing.
	So Megan Barth joins me now.
	Alright, what's the story in Nevada?
	And look, obviously a lot of times the local news coverage on this stuff is different than the national news coverage.
	I mean, for the most part, the national news has been completely silent on this story.
	I will show some people that are covering it, but mostly nobody is even talking about this.
	What's going on in Nevada?
	Where does Nevada stand?
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Okay, well, I'll just preface this by saying I'm not in Pennsylvania.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		I'm actually in northern Nevada, so I'm not in Pennsylvania.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		My crew's bad.
		They gave me bad information.
		I'll punish them later.
		Go ahead.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Sure.
		No problem.
		Well, Mark Elias has been on the ground in Nevada for years challenging any sort of election integrity lawsuit that the RNC or the GOP brings.
		And he was also involved in this lawsuit.
		And this lawsuit was specific To the late counting of ballots that do not, and mail ballots specifically, that do not have a postmark.
		So you have a ballot that is mailed, but somehow doesn't have a postmark, and the Democrats wanted to count that un-postmarked ballot, mailed ballot, for three days after the election.
		Now, the law specifically states, and if you're a good judge or a justice, you read the law as written, as it is written in black and white.
		Well, our Supreme Court is liberal and didn't read the law as written.
		The law as written says a postmarked ballot can be counted for three days after Election Day, which is a farce in and of itself.
		But a postmarked ballot that's hard to determine when it was sent, so there's no clear date, still can be counted up to three days after.
		Well, the judges found that ballots don't need a postmark at all.
		They basically rewrote the law and said any ballot that comes in that you can't even determine if it was there by Election Day can be counted up to three days after Election Day.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and let's think about how stupid this is.
		Let's look at the actual on-the-ground application.
		I mean, I could fill out a ballot on November 7th that says November 4th, or, you know, I could say October 31st, right?
		I mean, so that's the problem here, is that, no, you have to have your ballot in on time.
		If you don't get it there on time, that's on you.
		I mean, I remember, this just shows how elementary it is.
		I remember that there were certain assignments or things in school or even standardized tests.
		If you didn't even fill out your name, you got a zero.
		Like, if you didn't even fill out your name, you get a zero on a test.
		But, oh, for voting, you know, whatever.
		Who cares what a date?
		So you can fake a date on a thing.
		The point is what they're saying is they'll accept ballots after the election.
		They'll accept ballots that basically it doesn't even matter what the date on it is.
		So, I mean, where does it end?
		Where's the finish line then?
		I mean, is there any finish line?
		Is it just count ballots forever?
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Well, it sounds to me like they're just going to count ballots until they win, because that's the latitude that the Supreme Court of Nevada just gave the Democratic Party.
		And, you know, there's one more caveat to this decision, and the decision was twofold.
		One, you can count ballots that don't have postmarks up until three days after the election.
		Day.
		The second was they dismissed basically the suit on standing.
		Now, Nevada is the only state that continues, from a judicial standpoint, that continues to throw out lawsuits brought by the RNC and the GOP. They don't throw the lawsuit out on merit.
		They throw it out on standing.
		So I spoke to an election lawyer yesterday, and they told me that, and it was on condition of anonymity, there is this Because of judicial precedent in Nevada, there is this belief that the judicial system in Nevada is basically an extension and an executioner of the DNC. Nowhere else,
		when these types of cases, we look down at the Fifth Circuit, for example, in cases across the country where the RNC has actually been victorious in election integrity cases, They never, these judges in other locales, never dismissed on standing.
		Nevada always dismisses on standing.
		So you really can't be a voter or you can't be a voter rights organization or what have you and bring a case for election integrity because you will be dismissed for lack of standing.
		That has happened 99 times out of 100 in Nevada.
		So we have a problem with the judiciary in Nevada, obviously.
		We have a problem with the law.
		That was rewritten by a Democratic majority during the pandemic, which added in all of these different types of, for example, no postmarks, ballots can be received late, universal mail-in balloting, unlimited ballot harvesting.
		All of these things that fundamentally changed Nevada's election laws in 2020 have created this crisis, this lack of confidence in Nevada elections.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and again, I looked at the numbers that we were getting from Nevada, the mail-ins, the absentee, the early voting, the data that we have access to, and Nevada was looking good.
		I mean, I was looking at Nevada like, okay, I'm ready to sit here and say, this is looking like it's going to be good for Trump, it's going to be good for Republicans.
		And then right in the final weeks, just like they've done in so many other states, they come in with this ruling.
		I mean, so we're looking at a situation, and I would like to hear from you what, if anybody, is reporting about this in Nevada, because again, a lot of times the local news is obviously different than the national news, and I don't have access to that in Austin.
		I mean, I guess I could, but I'm just not looking.
		Perhaps you are.
		But we're looking at a situation now where, I mean, this would have to be Like 2020, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin all over again, where the vote Viagra for Biden sends it straight up at the buzzer, and they give it to Harris.
		I mean, that's what we're looking at here if they really try to pull this off, right?
		Because, I mean, otherwise, they just don't have the numbers right now.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, you know, Trump always says it's too big to rig, it's too big to rig, and right now we're looking at numbers that really show it might be too big to rig.
		I mean, this is the first time, perhaps, since 2004 or 2008, That Republicans are leading the state by about 40,000 votes.
		This has not happened under the Harry Reid machine.
		And, you know, we are only down, I think, like 3,000 votes in Clark County, which is the largest county.
		That's where Las Vegas is.
		That's where the predominant Democratic voters are.
		That's where the culinary union is.
		That's where the culinary ballot harvests on behalf of Democrats and gets out the vote.
		But last general election in 2020 at this time, Democrats were 40,000 ahead.
		Democrats were 10,000 ahead in Clark County.
		So there is a massive shift going on in the electorate.
		On top of that, we have new voter registrations.
		In Nevada, you can register the same day that you vote.
		Democrats used to have an 80,000 registration lead in Nevada.
		Voter registration lead.
		They now are reduced to under 10,000.
		So that tells us we're gaining traction, meaning the GOP, the Republican Party, is gaining traction on the Democrat firewall, if you will, that comes out of Clark County.
		The GOP is basically swamping the vote, as the RNC says.
		They are making it too big to rig, and I don't know if the delta that's presented by Election Day is really going to be able to be overcome three days after the election.
		Unless there is, and honestly, Owen, it would be very highly suspicious.
		Not that it would be uncommon, but it would be very highly suspicious that all of a sudden they made up for 50,000, 60,000 votes.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and I'm thinking about it more.
		And let's also consider that there's definitely going to be more Democrats voting for Trump than Republicans voting for Harris.
		So I think that that's a fair assumption to make.
		You know, the margins, you know, maybe not a good idea to guess.
		But it's a fair assumption.
		More Democrats are going to be voting Trump than Republicans for Harris.
		Most independents are going to be voting for Trump, I would imagine, anyway.
		So, again, all these numbers favor Republicans looking at Nevada.
		Maybe they're looking at a situation where, since Nevada is, you know, in the...
		I guess, is it in the Pacific or the mountain time zone, actually?
		It's in the Pacific time zone, right?
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Pacific, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So they're looking at a situation, I guess, where they can just say, okay, well, if we need Nevada, we can do it.
		You know, I mean, it's only the six electoral votes, so maybe they just look at it as, okay, well...
		If we need Nevada, then we'll pull this off.
		If we don't, then we'll just kind of leave it be.
		And I just had the crew bring me these numbers, and it's the same.
		It's the same everywhere else you look.
		And this is the big story nobody wants to talk about.
		Now, Hillary Clinton did win Nevada in 2016.
		She got 539,000 votes in Nevada to win the state.
		So in 2020, Donald Trump got 669,000 votes.
		He got nearly a million and a half more than Hillary Clinton.
		So surely he must have won Nevada.
		Oh, no, I'm sorry.
		No, Biden got 700,000 votes.
		He got almost 2 million more than Hillary Clinton, or excuse me, 200,000 more than Hillary Clinton.
		That's totally normal.
		Totally normal stuff.
		So this is the same story we saw across the board in 2020.
		It's the vote steroids.
		It's the Mark McGuire home run era.
		Barry Bonds.
		This is an anomaly.
		There's something causing this.
		It's not normal.
		Nobody wants to talk about it.
		It happened in almost every state in 2020.
		I'm afraid we could see the same thing here again in 2024 to put Kamala Harris over the edge.
		But yeah, I mean, we're looking at a situation where Trump will likely get 700,000 votes in Nevada.
		So what?
		Harris will get 800,000?
		I mean, it's just ridiculous.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Right.
		Like I said, this ruling by the Supreme Court kind of allows the Democrats to find the votes that they need.
		And when they have the infrastructure built into the largest county, which is Clark County in Nevada, to unlimited ballot harvest, to cure ballots, to get out the vote, to find ballots, to dump ballots, to put them into drop boxes that are unmanned and unsecured.
		But the problem is, and you mentioned the local press, right?
		The local press here is probably like the local press in Texas or anywhere.
		Very biased, very well-sided.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah.
		Oh, yeah.
		Even in Texas.
		I'm so glad you said that.
		You look at the local news here, it's like, you know, you can barely get a fair shot if you're a Republican.
		I mean, it's all slanted left.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Well, and that's why the Nevada Globe was started, because we realized that there was a vacuum of truth and information, like good information, in Nevada.
		And we've done extraordinarily well.
		We obviously hit the mark.
		And so, you know, when we try to report the truth, right, we're called election deniers, as you are, I'm sure.
		How dare you question an election?
		You know, we're no longer allowed to ask questions.
		Well, we're still going to ask questions.
		Especially when we have horrible Supreme Court decisions that just came down.
		That was a complete debasement of the function of a judiciary.
		The judiciary is not supposed to write laws.
		The judiciary is supposed to interpret laws as written.
		I assume that this will be appealed.
		However, how do you appeal it to the Supreme Court within a week?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		I don't know.
		Talked to the RNC. Yep.
		But eventually, I think this decision will be appealed, and then the local news media can eat crow, and we'll hopefully go back to the letter of the law, and if we get a Republican majority here in the legislature or at least make some inroads, we can change some of these awful laws that were changed in the dark of night during the pandemic without any public comment or without even any bipartisanship at all.
		It was all Democrat-driven.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and that's what's so frustrating is the Democrat playbook for victory.
		We've now seen it.
		You know, it's like a football team that, you know, has the trick play in the fourth quarter to score a touchdown.
		So this is the Democrats' trick play.
		All these legal actions that they've taken with a week to go.
		Virginia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, Nevada, Georgia, Arizona.
		It's all right now.
		They're running their trick play.
		And the Republicans' only response is, okay, well, let's get it to the Supreme Court.
		Good luck with that.
		We got less than a week till election day.
		I mean, I can sit here and cover all the news.
		This was CBS today, how the Supreme Court might act in the 2024 election.
		Here are the cases that could land before the court.
		There's six days, Megan.
		There's no time.
		And the Supreme Court traditionally doesn't want to get involved in election law.
		So it's too late.
		It's too late.
		They already ran the flea flicker.
		The quarterback's already almost to the end zone.
		The ball's in the air.
		I mean, this was their plan.
		They've done it.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I do have to say, comparatively, when you look back at other years, especially when Hillary Clinton was challenging the election in 2016, there was all of this disinformation and misinformation coming out from the deep state that was led by Hillary Clinton and others.
		This is the only election cycle that I've really seen the RNC and the GOP get involved in an offensive position.
		Meaning we're going to challenge these state laws that were primarily changed during the pandemic in 2020.
		And we're going to try to, you know, rush these decisions through as quick as we can so we aren't up against the clock.
		Unfortunately, in Nevada and some other states, I mean, the Fifth Circuit actually did a really good job.
		And I think the Fifth Circuit is actually going to set precedent here for the rest of the country.
		And the Fifth Circuit basically said, and that's the District Court of Appeals, they basically said that, no, federal law allows for an election day.
		And provides ample opportunity for constituents to get in their vote by Election Day.
		Any law that allows for the counting of ballots beyond Election Day is not in alignment with federal law and is therefore illegal.
		That's how this precedent could establish and upend other laws across the U.S. Nevada, I know, is not the only state that allows for the late counting of ballots.
		It should impact other states.
		So hopefully the RNC, the GOP, etc., takes this precedent and then drives it through, and it will end up into the Supreme Court.
		It's just not going to be for this election.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
		And, you know, the risk with that is assuming we'll even have another election.
		I mean, when the Democrats are this aggressive going for one party rule, I mean, who knows?
		They pack the Supreme Court.
		I mean, who knows what could happen between now and 2028?
		You know, here's a perfect example of this.
		And, you know, I don't need to prove this, but if the crew can pull it up just to really give it more leverage, we can.
		Guys, I'm talking about when we brought on John Paul Isaac, I believe was his name, or Mark Paul Isaac, or Paul Mark Isaac, I'm sorry, I forget the guy's name, the laptop repair shop owner who got the Hunter Biden laptop.
		We brought on the founder of Marco Polo, who published the laptop.
		I believe we did that in either 2020 or 2021.
		Well, today, you have the House Judiciary GOP IRS whistleblowers involved in Hunter Biden tax case reveal the IRS, the DOJ, and the FBI knew the laptop was real.
		The House Judiciary is calling it breaking news today.
		Oh my, breaking news!
		The Hunter Biden laptop is real.
		Breaking news, Megan!
		2024, 2020 election news today!
		I mean, this is a joke!
		Elon Musk reporting the same thing.
		Breaking news.
		The Hunter Biden laptop.
		Biden's not running, guys.
		The 2020 election is over.
		You already blew it.
		So good news.
		I guess we're right then.
		Yeah, so maybe in 2028 they'll say, golly gee, the mail-in ballots are a problem.
		Golly gee, we keep having record amounts of voter turnout.
		Golly gee.
		So maybe in 2028 they'll talk about what we're talking about today, Megan.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Yes, the conspiracy theorists and the election deniers have been vindicated, even though it's been four years later.
		And that's the problem with the news media.
		I mean, that's what we're seeing.
		And we see this right in front of our noses, especially when the Washington Post and the New York Times fails to endorse.
		You see this rabid Why are they having such a vitriolic reaction from quote-unquote journalists and reporters and editors within the legacy media?
		Why are they having such a vitriolic reaction to something that should be?
		And I don't believe that newspapers shouldn't get into the endorsement business.
		We don't endorse.
		I'm the editor.
		I'm not going to endorse.
		That shows an outward bias.
		So, you know, we're supposed to report the news.
		We're supposed to report and reveal the truth through public records requests and public documents and using the words that politicians say and holding them accountable to those words.
		That's the mark of good journalism, is if you can provide a balanced approach, right?
		You give the information to the public, and then the public can decide their opinion.
		I can do an opinion editorial 16 ways to Sunday.
		I don't do them often.
		But what we can see right now is that the lack of knowledge amongst our constituents, right, the lack of knowledge of the American people is due to the fact that the legacy media really has been the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.
		Now that Elon Musk has entered the public square by purchasing Twitter, he's unleashed free speech.
		And that has challenged the institutions.
		You know, the Grey Old Lady, the New York Times, Democracy Dies in Darkness, the Washington Post, and others.
		The LA Times, for example, did not endorse.
		I don't know if it was the New York Times.
		I know the LA Times didn't endorse.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Washington Post, LA Times.
		And I mean, look, Bezos, you know, he's had like four years of testosterone cycles, so I'm not really sure how liberal he is anymore.
		The LA Times, when that billionaire gave it to his leftist daughter, I mean, she basically destroyed the paper.
		I mean, most of them don't make a profit anyway, but she completely destroyed it.
		So I get why the LA Times is doing it, too.
		They're just trying to save whatever reputation they have left.
		And maybe they don't want to endorse a loser in their eyes.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that could be very well.
		But I think the pressure, too, is being put on the fact that With Elon Musk's acquisition of Twitter, it has unleashed, right, this energy of free speech.
		You have younger people waking up to, you know, what free speech really means, that there is so many different ways now to get the news.
		I don't watch TV. I don't get the newspaper.
		I get all my news really on Twitter because if there's anything breaking, it's going to be on Twitter.
		And so as more and more people go to this To Twitter, which is now a free speech, you know, land of really opportunity to learn.
		They're going away from legacy media.
		You see this even with CNN and MSNBC. And so once you give people a dose and a taste of freedom, they don't forget it.
		And I think that's what free speech provides and that's what Elon Musk has provided.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I think there's kind of this level of people that are just lost in the political morass, and they don't really hear anybody that talks or thinks like them, and now they can get access to those people through X, you know, whether it's you, whether it's me.
		or others, or Elon Musk, or anybody, you know, it's kind of that way to cut through your just generic political teleprompter reader on TV versus somebody that talks and thinks like they do, that they can finally get access to again.
		So many people that got banned off of social media starting in 2018.
		I want to get into one more thing with you here before we let you go.
		Guys, B-roll clip 17.
		I believe this is the Las Vegas sphere clip.
		Kamala Harris, they're going for Vegas.
		They know they need it.
		They see what we saw a month ago when I first talked to you on this show, that this could end up determining the election.
		Just Las Vegas alone.
		Crazy enough, but true.
		That's why she stole the no tax on tips policy.
		Alright, so this is the Las Vegas sphere, which is truly an incredible phenomenon.
		I mean, it's almost obnoxious, but it is pretty incredible.
		So, okay, I think we can both agree now that Trump needs to get something on there.
		Trump needs to put something epic on that sphere and fast.
		I mean, I don't know.
		I guess they could deny it, but I don't know why they would.
		So what do you think?
		We've got to get Trump on the sphere.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		I think that would be epic.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		He probably should do an event at the Sphere.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, yeah.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hell yeah.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		So he is planned, and so is Kamala.
		They're going to be in Las Vegas on Halloween, both in Las Vegas.
		Trump will be in Henderson, which is a suburb.
		Kamala will be in Las Vegas.
		They never, or at least Kamala's campaign, never indulges where they're going to be.
		So I'm unsure as far as the location.
		They never do.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, they've got to have an excuse why no one shows up.
megan barth ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, maybe.
		And then as a member of the press, I never get a response, which I'm not surprised.
		But nonetheless, they have their selected press they want there, and then they have their selected organizers that they want there, and their selected crowd.
		Whereas with Trump, you know, when he came to Vegas last year and announced the no tax on tips, that was like the shot heard around the world in the valley, quite frankly.
		And so I think I said to you last time we met, it's worth repeating, This no tax on tips really strikes a chord because our number one industry in Las Vegas and Nevada is the hospitality industry.
		No one was talking about this until Trump mentioned it.
		Then all of a sudden, the Culinary Union endorsed it.
		Then Jackie Rosen, who's running for Senate, endorsed it.
		Then Kamala finally endorsed it two months later.
		But they put caveats on the no tax on tips.
		Well, we're gonna have to look to see who's really going to get the tip, etc.
		So we know it's kind of BS when it comes from the Kamala campaign or the Rose campaign.
		And the Culinary Union in itself, the bosses, are all Democrats, right?
		They're all going to stump for Democrats.
		They're in their back pocket.
		They've always been in the Democrats' back pocket.
		But outside of the brass, the workers, the valet guys, The cocktail waitresses, the busboys, the bartenders, you name it.
		They are the working class that is getting crushed by the Kamala Biden policy.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And they all know Trump is the only answer for them.
		All right, Megan, I'm out of time.
		TheNevadaGlobe.com.
		I appreciate you joining us.
		If there's any other breaking news out of Nevada, let me know.
		But you're right.
		Trump needs to do an event at the Sphere and put something crazy on that thing behind him.
		It'll go totally viral, not just the outside, but the inside.
		Alright, now, you just heard my last guest talk about how the Kamala Harris campaign is very hush-hush, very shadowy about where her event is going to be, and that's because they don't want all the protesters to show up.
		And by the way, they show up from the left and the right.
		So they just send it to their known voters, their known heavy supporters, and, you know, unless, of course, they think it's going to be a Beyonce show, and then they get let down and they all bitch and moan.
		But Kamala Harris did make this event public today.
		She was speaking at the Ellipse today.
		And ladies and gentlemen, when I say it was a no-show crowd, I mean it was a no-show crowd.
		Fifty people were in line.
		Donald Trump had over a million people at the Ellipse not too long ago.
		Kamala Harris can't even get a hundred.
		And that's in D.C., So, you know, I really want to hear the opinion of the great pollster from Rasmussen Reports, Mark Mitchell, coming up next on just all the different things that he's seeing.
		Not just the polls, but the early data, the vibe, everything else.
		He's going to be joining us in less than five minutes.
		So, big event for Kamala today!
		At the Ellipse!
		And it's a total dud.
		Nobody shows up.
		How embarrassing.
		She should have brought Beyonce with her, and maybe somebody might have showed up.
		Alright, now.
		They thought she was going to draw $50,000!
		Oh my gosh!
		I bet you they sent more security to that than January 6th!
		Oh no, it's such an embarrassment.
		Oh wow, it's worse than I thought.
		Alright.
		Holy smokes.
		She'll get 900 million votes, though.
		It's going to be incredible.
		All right, ladies and gentlemen, gotta let you know about the Alex Jones VIP Club.
		It's at thealexjonesstore.com.
		And if you're not a member, what are you waiting for?
		It's a great way to support Alex Jones right now, and there's so many benefits that come with it, like monthly membership credits.
		When you become a VIP member, you get $40 in-store credit every month.
		You get the products at the store at an even bigger discount.
		Even when they're on sale on the site, it's a bigger discount for VIP members.
		You get automatic double entries in giveaways, like the Monster Truck Raffle that's happening right now.
		I'll tell you more about that coming up shortly.
		Double entries in those giveaways, plus there's VIP-only giveaways.
		Only the VIPs get access to certain giveaways.
		You've got to be a member of the club to get that access.
		You also get early access to other products, promos, and giveaways, plus free shipping.
		When your order is over $99, you get free shipping, but you got to be a member of the club, thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. Now the truck, it's not too late, ladies and gentlemen, but you are running out of time.
		It is ending as of tomorrow.
		So you have today and tomorrow.
		But that's the Monster Truck Raffle coming to an end on Wednesday.
		You can still get in.
		It's not too late.
		Time is running out, but you've got to make your purchases now at thealexjonesstore.com to be entered to win the Monster Truck.
		So really, the exact number is one day and nine hours.
		One day, nine hours, 56 minutes.
		That's the time you have left to be entered to win the monster truck featured there on the screen.
		And really...
		The photos don't even do it justice.
		This thing is truly a monster truck.
		I mean, it's ridiculous.
		The wheels themselves are like four feet tall.
	So, make sure to get to thealexjonesstore.com.
	Make your purchases, become eligible to get in the raffle for the monster truck, or go to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP to get even more benefits on the store when you are a member of the VIP club.
	All right.
	Coming up next in less than two minutes is Mark Mitchell from RasmussenReports.com.
	One of the most respected polling locations to go.
	We'll talk about the poll numbers he sees.
	We'll go back in time.
	We'll see what he was seeing in 2016, 2020, now in 2024.
	We'll look at some of the other news that's developing as well.
	But, I mean, my goodness, what an embarrassment for Kamala Harris, ladies and gentlemen.
	They were expecting 50,000 today at the Ellipse for her.
	I saw a line of 50.
unidentified		50.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, you know what?
		They might get...
		Call the bus lines.
		You know what I mean?
		I mean, get the buses.
		Get them started.
		Go and find people to bus to D.C. ASAP. She might have to cancel the event if people don't show up.
		That's how bad this is.
		So, wow.
		That's fun.
		Alright, one of the most respected polling locations out there is RasmussenReports.com and Mark Mitchell...
		is one of the forces behind Rasmussen reports and their polls.
		He joins me now and you know I don't even know where to begin with you Mark there's so much there's just so much to get into now with a week till election day.
		Let me just start with the basics.
		Where do you see things right now?
		What do the polls indicate right now?
		And then maybe we'll do some compare and contrast to the last two presidential elections where Trump was running.
		But based off what you're seeing right now, what are the big stories?
		What are the big trends?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Well, really, I think that this is a safe Trump win, and we've been saying that for months.
		And if it doesn't match what you think, it's because you've been paying attention to the mainstream media and how they cherry-pick polls.
		And also, some of the mainstream media-affiliated pollsters, I think, have proven that they've been carrying water for Democrats.
		But listen, we showed Trump winning every single weekly poll we put out for this entire cycle.
		He was up big over Biden, plus four, plus five after the debate.
		And we always said, well, Kamala Harris is a little bit better of a candidate.
		The race is going to tighten up.
		It's probably going to be a two or three point race.
		And then for the last two or three months, that's what our daily numbers have put out.
		But we've just watched everybody else in the industry just be clown themselves, trip over themselves to move all of their polls Seven points to the left and they are all moving back.
		Reuters, Ipsos had Trump up before the switcheroo.
		And then believe it or not, they got all the way up to Harris plus six and now they're back at Harris plus one.
		Polls don't move like that after Trump's been in politics for like 10 years.
		There really aren't that many people who have like their minds not made up.
		So in reality, it was all just lies to fuel the media trying to push this woman over the hump.
		But basically, because of how bad Joe Biden's administration was, how people literally can't afford to feed themselves, how the justice system was weaponized, and nobody trusts the media anymore, and they lost trust in all of their government institutions, here we are.
		People seem like they basically decided after all this that they want to vote Trump.
		Because a Trump plus two national popular vote result, which is what we show and a lot of other people now, finally are starting to agree with us.
		It means that he probably sweeps all the swing states and does better than all the polling shows.
		And that's basically what the betting market confirms, as well as every major statistical-based election prediction outlet.
		Even FiveThirtyEight says that this is gonna go for Trump.
		What's crazy is it took us all this while to get to a place where we can actually talk about that.
		And in my opinion, that just shows how 2020 hangs over this election like a disgusting stink of filth, Paul, that everybody...
		It's like the elephant in the room.
		People were traumatized, I think, by 2020.
		And the country is not in a good state if they're going to try and do those same kind of hijinks, in my opinion.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, you're probably speaking to a guy that's still traumatized by 2020, actually.
		And so...
		And I want to circle back to what you just said, but I don't want to stay in the muck here.
		I want to get to all these topics with you before we do circle back.
		Let's talk about the Harris tank, right?
		And I mean, that's really what we've seen is this Harris tank.
		And, you know, it's a different analysis because Harris has only been a candidate now for, I think, 100 days, right?
		So you don't really have a full campaign to kind of go after and look at numbers with Harris.
		I mean, you can look at her numbers when she was vice president, they were awful, but you can potentially just throw those out, obviously, the way the Democrat mind game works, and they're just all in the tank for Harris now, but...
		Let's talk about the Harris tank.
		I mean, really, when she she was avoiding the press for months and then with about three weeks till the election, so about two weeks ago, she started doing this media tour.
		And that's really when the Harris tank began.
		Are you seeing this in your polling numbers?
		You know, you talked about the swings.
		But I mean, how would you how would you kind of describe the Harris tank or what does it look like in the actual numbers?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		The Harris tank is a realization among mainstream media outlets that their tailwind that they've been trying to give her wasn't enough, and now they're trying to save their credibility.
		Because in my opinion, the polls haven't shown this.
		In fact, the media narrative collapsing on her Actually led both the polls and the betting market, which is absolutely crazy.
		But again, I've shown the race locked in at Trump plus two.
		She basically hit a ceiling in my numbers right after the DNC about the time that RFK dropped out and endorsed Trump.
		And she's been at about a 47 point, 47 and a half point.
		So what it is, is that they all looked around and said, listen, we tried everything to make this woman likable.
		And she's still trailing where Hillary Clinton was eight years ago when Hillary Clinton lost.
		And I mean, you literally saw it about three, four weeks ago.
		CNN came out and said, oh, danger signs for her campaign.
		People said, oh, the wheels are falling off.
		The polling hadn't changed, right?
		And then after that, all the polling came back to the right to where mine was.
		And I think they tried their best to get her over the hump and it just wasn't enough.
		I know it's really cynical to say that, but she's not a likable candidate.
		And only then did she enter the doom loop of like, oh man, the media is not shilling for me anymore.
		I have to go out and be likable.
		I have to do Fox News interviews and they're just absolutely failing.
		Just the Fox News interview alone shows that they have no strategy.
		She wasn't trying to pick up undecided voters.
		She wasn't trying to woo maybe Republicans that didn't kind of like Trump.
		But she didn't even acknowledge that there was a problem with the border at all.
		It's like she came into Fox and tried to control their reality.
		That's not changing any minds at all.
		They just don't know how to do it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why do the polls sway or tend to lean Democrat?
		Is that by choice with who they're polling?
		Is that because Republicans tend to not respond to a poll?
		Maybe Republicans don't want to admit they're Republicans, but it's true.
		Why do they tend to sway towards the Democrats?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		We're independent.
		We are funded by subscribers and advertisers and we do not report up to a massive media organization.
		ABC Disney owns FiveThirtyEight.
		They kicked us out for ideological reasons, and now they're taking the left-leaning polling industry and moving it even farther left.
		I think across the board, there are a couple things.
		I think a lot of media outlets want Harris to win and will cherry pick polling results.
		And then I also think pollsters know where their bread is buttered and they have a confirmation bias.
		And if they think they want Harris to win, maybe they'll reanalyze results that show that Trump is doing better.
		There's a lot of different stories out there.
		And you can look at the cross tabs and just, in my opinion, say, well, there's there's no way that Donald Trump has a 30 point favorability disadvantage like ABC polling shows.
		And it's the same ABC that's owned by Disney that's destroying all their entertainment IP for the message.
		So I really do think it is this big, unified cabal of people that are opposed to Trump.
		And whether they're doing it on purpose or not, if we're not accurate, our business fails.
		I'm not out there trying to shill for Trump.
		In fact, I'm being super careful that I don't overestimate what I think he might do.
		And I think he will outperform our polling.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, we'll talk about Trump and polling coming up.
		I don't know if you heard his comments about pollsters on the Rogan podcast.
		It was very interesting.
		Okay, yeah, I'll get your take on that.
		But first, what about, I mean, how deep do you guys go into the Senate races, the House races?
		I saw you had Ted Cruz up plus four on All Red here in Texas.
		That's good news.
		I expected Cruz to win anyway, but it's good to see that.
		What about the Senate races?
		What about the House races?
		Is it mostly just down-ballot success off Trump, or are your polls showing something else?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		So states are harder to poll than nationally, and we're pulling more states than we ever have.
		And most of the battleground states, we've gone in and showed that they're either a statistical tie or they're leaning Trump.
		But I will tell you that we were way too left on the states in 2020.
		And I picked up some of that slack, but not all of it.
		And I think that none of the polls are tuned to this low propensity voter or first time voter that breaks Trump.
		I didn't go out on a limb and try and project like, oh, this might happen for Trump or this might happen for Trump.
		I just kind of did conservative weightings based on 2020.
		So I think Trump is going to outperform all my polling.
		Every single battleground state in RealClearPolitics right now is going for Trump by 0.2 to like two points and change like Georgia.
		But that is the average of all of the industry.
		And there are some major lefties in there.
		And I can tell you there are no Republican leading pollsters.
		I'm not trying to lean Republican, and we're probably on the right bookend there.
		So any industry error at all, and Donald Trump will sweep the battlegrounds.
		So, I mean, I think that's really great.
		Now, as far as the Senate and down ballot, we've done the Senate.
		And one of the things is that the Senate candidates do tend to trail Donald Trump in all the states, although we do show that some of them are really tight.
		I think we had Havdi up one.
		McCormick tied in some of the polling.
		Carrie Lake has been down a lot more than others.
		But there are some really competitive races.
		Part of that is because people answering polls might not be in tune to the party and then they show up and vote Trump and then vote straight R down ballot.
		So I do think some of those people will outperform compared to what the polling shows.
		But then there's also this whole aspect of the industry is moving more towards online panels.
		The data is messier.
		A lot of these people say they're going to vote, but they're really not.
		And so you have to be careful and vigilant and throw out crap data.
		But if the data shows you something you want and you report up to a managing editor for the New York Times or something, maybe you don't go that extra level of analytical rigor.
		Now, as far as Congress, I can say that the Republicans definitely have a brand disadvantage.
		However, strangely, this time around, the generic ballot has been doing almost about as good as Trump in all of the battleground states.
		So that's like a tie to up.
		And so in that kind of environment, there should be some house pickups.
		And I think what you also see in the betting markets is that now a full Republican sweep is starting to actually become the plurality winner there.
		So I think the betting markets are starting to interpret the polling.
		And that's been a theme this entire cycle is the betting markets are interpreting the reality of the polls.
		Better than the media is.
		The media is out there still following this race too close to call.
		If you hear it's too close to call on CNN, that means Trump's winning.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I don't know if I would.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, if you hear anything on CNN, you might want to make sure you didn't suffer brain damage or something.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Change the channel.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
		But, okay, so if we're looking at the Senate and the House, because I'm kind of looking at things, and I tend to agree, I think the Republicans are favored to win the House.
		I mean, it could be by 10 seats, but it could be by 20.
		I mean, they could have a pretty big advantage in the House, or it could be closer to single digits.
		The Senate, I think, is going to be tight.
		It's definitely going to be tight no matter if it goes blue or red.
		It's probably going to be maybe two, at the most, three-seat advantage either way, I think is the way I see it.
		Is that kind of what you're looking at right now?
		But it's basically just so tight.
		Really, the Senate, it's a lot harder to say.
		The House races, it's easier for Republicans to win those.
		Senates, it's a little tougher.
		So would you say your polling data is kind of indicating the same thing?
		The House looks safe, but the Senate, you know, that one's going to be razor thin.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		No, I think there's going to be a bunch of pickups.
		I think when they pick up Montana, I think that McCormick's got about as good a shot as anybody.
		Hoffey's doing really good.
		Sam Brown in our last poll, maybe it was an outlier, but he was getting there too.
		And Carrie Lake has been an enigma.
		I'm not sure what's going on there.
		She's been between down big to down two points.
		But I also think that Trump is going to outperform in Arizona, so that might be enough to get her over the hump.
		Listen, I think there's going to be a significant...
		Amount of Senate pickups.
		And of course, if Donald Trump wants to get anything from his agenda passed, I mean, quite frankly, he probably needs a 20 point margin in the Senate, but like a five or six point would be way better than the split Senate we have now.
		So yeah, and again, what this also comes down to is I think there is statistical hurting going on in the states.
		I think pollsters are wary to put out Trump winning.
		And I think everybody's kind of crowded into this, like, sort of tied race.
		But what they aren't showing is that, like, Trump is winning the national popular vote now in the Rookler Politics Aggregate.
		This includes people like Morning Consult, who has been like six, seven, eight points too far to the left.
		So maybe they got better this cycle, but it's reasonable to believe that they're still way too far to the left.
		And again, I mean, I'm using a Democrat plus two electorate.
		I do think that Trump might outperform our Trump plus two nationally.
		And those people live in states.
		Those people are going to be distributed everywhere.
		And it depends, I mean, how many of them are in battlegrounds versus places like New Jersey and New York and all these other states.
		I've run the data.
		New Jersey and New York, Trump's like basically cut how far he's been behind in half.
		And so there might be some really big surprise congressional pickups.
		It all just depends how it's distributed.
		So again, I don't want to sound too bullish for everybody who wants Trump to win.
		We've been surprised in the past.
		But it's not the same environment.
		In 2020, when Donald Trump barely lost by tens of thousands of votes in the swing state, in our polling, he was down big.
		We had actually Biden up on average about six points over Trump in the national popular race.
		We got him up two now.
		That's an eight-point swing.
		It is a totally different ballgame and even totally different than eight years ago.
		And I think the early vote and registration advantage, none of that stuff's been baked into my polls for sure.
		And my polls show everybody's coping and saying, well, Republicans are showing up big in the early vote.
		They're not going to show up on Election Day.
		But every single one of the states I've done this week, we ask, how do you plan to vote?
		And the people who say they're going to vote in Election Day still go Trump by between five and ten points.
		So Republicans still have fuel in the tank.
		It's not going to be this scenario where all of a sudden Democrats decide to show up on Election Day.
		And again, it's a week.
		And a lot could happen, right?
		Carter could die.
		There could be state funerals.
		Biden could resign.
		Every day is like one less day that Democrats have a shot to play this kind of stuff.
		But also, we could just see, I mean, everybody talks about the Reagan-Carter Big Bang.
		We still have a week.
		That could happen.
		And there are some signs that maybe the people who aren't the Democrats are just in the polls.
		They always say, oh, I'm definitely going to vote.
		Oh, I'm very enthusiastic, just as much as Republicans.
		But a lot could happen and maybe they sit it out.
		I mean, you know, Trump on Rogan, now J.D. Vance is going on Rogan.
		Kamala Harris is getting heckled at every event she goes to.
		And just like you said, she's just not turning anybody out.
		Now, I will say Democrats don't need that same kind of You know, energy, right, to go to the polls, and you can read into maybe some of that's their electioneering asymmetry, and some of that is, I mean, they really have been taught that Trump is Hitler.
		Like, half of MSNBC viewers think that the biggest issue facing our country is the threat to democracy that Donald Trump poses.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I'm sure you saw that 49% of Democrats said Trump is a fascist.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Oh, man.
		No, we didn't pull that one yet.
		I probably should, but we're kind of running out of time.
		But in all the swing states, we asked, you know, everybody has the major issue set where they show like 10 issues and tell you like what's the number one issue.
		We did that.
		The economy wins.
		Borders second.
		Abortion's third because of Democrats.
		But then we said, what's the primary issue that the next president has to fix?
		And we only give him four choices.
		The economy, the border, abortion, and protecting democracy.
		And MSNBC, people who say they trust MSNBC most- Like 46% of them say, across all the swing states that we did in September, say that protecting democracy is the number one issue.
		I think it's like another 25% say abortion.
		You're basically at three out of four MSNBC watchers.
		None of them care about the border at all.
		And only like 10% care about the economy.
		But if you watch Fox News or Newsmax, you're in a totally different reality.
		For them, it's like three quarters to 80% say that the border and the economy are number one.
		And I'll tell you, the Newsmax people are really based.
		And I can only give four choices.
		But we asked everybody, if you're given the choice between 100% deportation candidate and 100% amnesty candidate, who would you support?
		And swing state voters say the deportation candidate by a majority, I think it was like 53 to 36%.
		Like really stunning, considering that these states are pretty locked up between Trump and Harris.
		But Newsmax people is like 94 to 2 or something ridiculous like that.
		And the MSNBC people, they just want amnesty.
		So two different Americas really divided.
		And there are people who are gonna vote blue no matter who.
		And she's always had lower favorability ratings than even Biden.
		Biden was not a well-liked president.
		The second she got anointed, her favorability in our polling jumped.
		Not as much as In ABC News or some of those other people who showed a 15-point net favorability pickup.
		But yeah, she's got a pretty high Democrat favorability.
		They're kind of happy with her.
		They say she's competent.
		It's scary how strong the gaslighting is.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah, it's scary.
		Liberal progressives are definitely scary politically.
		So, you know, I, as I said earlier, I kind of live with the trauma of the 2020 election.
		I mean, I don't hide from it.
		I bring it to the air every day.
		I definitely live in that trauma.
		And I don't want to bring you into the mud with that.
		Final moments here with Mark Mitchell from RasmussenReports.com.
		Now, you said you heard what Trump said about the polling and the pollsters on the Rogan podcast, basically insinuating he doesn't have much trust or much faith in them.
		He even thinks, I mean, he insinuated he thinks some of them are con men.
		Do you want to divulge either your opinion on that or do you want to divulge, because I've been saying this too, and you kind of mentioned it earlier, how a lot of the polling is now done differently.
		It's a lot of online stuff.
		It's a lot of email list stuff.
		I mean, do you want to divulge how you conduct polls or what you think about the polling market in general?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I think Trump was exercising a little bit of hyperbole there.
		He definitely has internal pollsters.
		I will say that he pays them probably 10 to 100 times more than we earn.
		But there will always be pollsters.
		Pollsters are important.
		The second you don't have pollsters, you're going to be Venezuela.
		And there are definitely dishonest people in the industry, but they are.
		I mean, they're paying money to actually do samples and And they put out crosstabs.
		There's some amount of transparency so you can kind of see, well, this is why they got the Harris plus four that they did.
		They oversampled Trump hating Republicans.
		And so data is useful no matter how much harder it's going to get.
		So polling will always be there.
		It will always be tough.
		Pollsters will always get yelled at.
		But we're kind of like the industry pariah or the redheaded stepchild.
		And that's fine.
		Trump will use our charts and that's great, but then I think also it probably serves him to pretend we don't exist.
		And the mainstream media industry certainly pretends that we don't exist.
		They all look at our numbers.
		I can assure you that because we're putting out just as much information as Morning Consult and Morning Consult is absolute garbage.
		And a lot of it is because we pulled on the issues that everybody doesn't want to touch.
		We pulled on vaccine safety.
		We pulled on weaponization of the government.
		And you said you didn't want to drag us into the mud.
		But we're the only pollster actively pulling on election integrity as well.
		And I can tell you that all this BS about the safest and most secure Let me inject because I'm obviously one of those percents.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let me ask you this to focus on that for a second.
		Considering where that was in 2020 and to where that is today, where do you think it goes in the future?
		Well, either way, I mean, if Kamala wins, if Trump wins, where do you think that number goes based off the trends you've seen in four years?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I don't know.
		Our country's in a really bad place.
		We now have a record 43% of voters who think a civil war or revolution is likely in the next few years, including 46 to 47% of battleground state viewers.
		And actually, we asked the question, how likely is it there will be a violent reaction after Election Day if Kamala Harris wins?
		We also asked it if Trump wins.
		And regardless of who they say wins, it's roughly about half of voters that think there's gonna be violence in basically a week from now.
		So that's a really bad spot.
		And we've been trying to get ahead of this.
		The worst thing for this country is for Donald Trump to do really well, better than all the polling said.
		But then three or four states decide not to count and then drag their feet and then stuff ballots.
		I think that's gonna actually potentially cause violence because of how inflamed everybody is.
		So we're trying to get out ahead of that.
		We have numbers coming out this week, but we asked, and I mean, a lot of people are really angry about it.
		We asked how likely is it that there are election workers that have enabled fraud in elections?
		And we get a majority And then we ask what the criminal punishment should be, and 60% of people give a response that includes prison sentence, and 3% of Republicans even say capital punishment.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Mark, I'm up against a break here.
		I'd like you to finish this thought.
		If you can hold through this break, I'd like you to finish that thought.
		I'm up against it here.
		Mark Mitchell from Rasmussen Reports.
		We're going to hold him over here.
		Let's let him finish this thought here and the results when it comes to election integrity.
		The only polling group that does it is Rasmussen.
		All right, Mark Mitchell is with us still from RasmussenReports.com.
		I wanted to let him finish up on the polling results he got talking about election integrity.
		And as he said, he's the only group that's polling on that.
		I'm not surprised.
		Nobody else even has the courage to talk about it.
		And so it's funny because, I mean, you know, I said I didn't want to drag you to the mud on this issue, but, you know, you're polling on it.
		You're getting real-time results.
		And to just kind of give you a starter here...
		Forget about even the polling.
		I'll let you talk about the polling.
		What I noticed is...
		I just went from a place where in 2020...
		Most people either didn't believe that an election could be stolen or they were unwilling to talk about it or say publicly how they felt about it.
		Now, I would say at least on the conservative side, let's say the Trump supporting side, now most people believe an election can be stolen and most people are even willing to talk about it.
		I don't think we kind of, I don't know if we've crossed that threshold when it comes to Republican representatives.
		I would say we probably haven't yet.
		It's getting closer.
		The new brand Republican might be there.
		And then as far as the mainstream media is concerned, you know, let's say there's 100 people in conservative mainstream media.
		There's probably only 20 or 30 that would be willing to even suggest that that might be a potential.
		Maybe that changes.
		But that's just kind of what I see from more of a, you know, a media observer, a trend observer.
		But you were getting into the actual poll numbers.
		So go ahead and lay back into that.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, absolutely.
		Listen, we need to know if there's broad elections.
		Otherwise, how could we possibly predict the outcome?
		And we're kind of in a situation based on how pollsters pick their party winnings on previous elections where like, I don't know how many Democrats there are.
		And that's kind of puts me in a tough spot.
		But after the 2020 election, when Republicans colluded, mainstream Republicans colluded with Democrats to say that it was a safe and secure election, first time out of the gate, we asked how likely is it that cheating affected the 2020 election?
		And we got a number basically 49%.
		And that really surprised us.
		And we kept asking it.
		And the number has been as high as 64%.
		66% of people who think cheating is likely in this election.
		And that's way up because we asked it in advance of the 2022 election and still got a number less than 50%.
		So we've polled on basically everything you could possibly poll on.
		Audits, IDs, the cheat boxes, literally everything.
		And voters hate that stuff.
		And what's crazy is everybody, Republicans, Democrats, and independents alike, I think that it's very important to prevent cheating in elections.
		And overwhelmingly, a strong majority of people say what's most important, preventing cheating or making sure everybody votes.
		Preventing cheating wins by about a two to one margin, except for Democrats.
		So that's what sets them apart.
		Is this like meme that basically there's people that are still disenfranchised somewhere?
		But horrible situation.
		And I think you're right about the Republicans because there are, we've been told, major conservative outlets who refuse.
		I mean, they'll be happy to have us on to talk about elections.
		They refuse to cover the election integrity or the vaccine stuff.
		But I mean, it's clear as day.
		We've asked a million times.
		When states are late in reporting their election results, does that make you more confident or less confident in the accuracy of the final results?
		45% say less confident.
		Only 19% say more confident.
		Are there election workers and officials who have enabled fraud in election?
		47% say yes.
		Only 3 out of 10 voters in America say no.
		That's really horrible.
		It's two-thirds of Republicans who say yes.
		Only 18% who say no.
		And independence is 51% to 22%.
		How likely is it that officials who have enabled election cheating will be held criminally accountable?
		And only 25% say very likely, but 44% say not likely.
		And what should be the punishment for election officials found guilty of cheating in elections?
		15% say prison sentences, 45% say all three of them.
		Prohibition from holding public office, fines, and prison sentences.
		So we're trying to get ahead of what could happen next week.
		And we've already seen that states are dragging their feet on the voting.
		We've heard a lot of talk about the overseas ballots.
		And even the mainstream media priming the narrative that there's gonna be violence at polling locations.
		So anything is still on the table.
		And my call to these people in the swing states working these elections is understand that Americans are very concerned about election integrity and the risk of violence about stolen elections, in my opinion, is higher than it's ever been.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and these polling results are amazing to me for a couple reasons.
		Because we hear the Democrats talking about protect democracy, and you even run polls where they say that's their big thing is to protect democracy, or they say we don't want disenfranchised voters.
		Well, you know, cheating kind of completely destroys both of those concepts, right?
		I mean, if you cheat, you disenfranchise every single voter.
		And if you cheat, there is no protecting the democracy.
		It's not a democracy, you know, at that point.
		So, I mean, it's kind of, you know, it's ironic that these polling results show that.
		And here's a perfect example.
		The Atlantic is, you know, blaming me, of course.
		And I guess they're probably tuned into the show right now if you want to say hi to our friends at The Atlantic.
		They're quoting things I say on this show, how I suspect they're going to steal Wisconsin and Michigan and Pennsylvania.
		And so, yeah, I'm afraid there's going to be a steal.
		So that's me wanting to protect democracy.
		That's me not wanting to disenfranchise voters.
		But because I don't say it like that, because I don't say it with the Democrat buzzwords, somehow I'm bad.
		And the polling results even show that that's the case based off of what you've seen.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		So I've got numbers for The Atlantic, and I want them to quote me on this.
		We asked, is it okay for votes in elections to take more than one day, or should they be counted the day of Election Day?
		And overwhelmingly, voters say counted on Election Day 54% to 40%.
		But the people who say that protecting our democracy It's the number one issue.
		Two-thirds of them say, yeah, sure, take more than one day.
		It's fine.
		Only 28% of them say that votes should be counted on election day.
		And that is the strongest signal for delayed voting out of anybody.
		People who think illegal immigration is the number one issue, they want votes counted on election day, 74% to 21%.
		So people who are interested in protecting our democracy seem awful loose about how it goes about being protected.
		And of course, we all know it's because they're anti-Trump fascists.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and you know, again, it's always misnomers, hyperbole, irony when you deal with Democrat talking points because they talk about democracy all day long, but they only want democracy when it favors them.
		They don't want democracy when it comes to abortion.
		They don't want democracy when it comes to legislating from the bench, which, I mean, that's what this election is going to be determined on is the rules that have been established by judges, not by state legislatures, not by voters, not by Congress, by judges.
		So, I mean, I wonder how they would feel about legislation from the bench.
		That's not democracy, and yet that's where we're going.
		You know, I would also, I mean, I would believe, based off what I heard from you, that the reason why there was a major shift in election integrity beliefs in your polling from 2020 to 2022 was probably after what people saw in Pennsylvania and Arizona.
		I mean, a mongoloid one in Pennsylvania named John Fetterman.
		And then in Arizona, you had, you know, all the craziness with Lake and Hamaday and the others.
		And I think people saw that.
		You know, had big issues as well.
		So, you know, hey, I hope I'm wrong.
		I hope they don't steal Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania.
		Believe me, you know, I'll take the L on that to get Trump into the office.
		It would mean a lot more.
		But at the same time, for the same reason why you won't rig your polls is the same reason why I'm not going to come on here and say things I don't believe.
		All right.
		Any final words?
		Mark Mitchell, RasmussenReports.com.
		A week till the election.
		Any final words for the audience today?
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I really think it's a solid Trump win and everybody really should be looking out for fraud because I think it's likely to believe that.
		And listen, this is literally an authoritarian oligarchy that like these people wanted to put the unvaccinated in camps.
		These people, according to voters, weaponized the judicial system against their enemies.
		And even, like, you think about things like, oh, Mockingbird, oh, that's a fringe conspiracy theory.
		64% of voters in this country think it's at least somewhat likely that intel agencies are giving the news talking points.
		And so I think authority, I think the media, I think...
		A lack of authenticity and gaslighting have jumped the shark.
		And we're going to find out in a week.
		And everybody should have a head on a swivel.
		Vote early.
		And we'd love to have people following us, too.
		Rasmussen underscore poll.
		And go to our website, too.
		You can get a free daily newsletter of all the polls that we put out.
		Happy to see people there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Absolutely.
		Mark, thank you for your time.
		And keep up the great work.
		We'll be monitoring those polls.
mark mitchell ▲ ● ▼		Thanks for having me here.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right.
		Now, here's the deal, ladies and gentlemen, as we're just more than halfway through the show now.
		I got a ton of news on my desk that I still need to cover.
		I got about 20 important video clips that I'd like to get to, but there's so much happening on the ground right now in these battleground states.
		I feel like I have to go to the phone lines, specifically with what's developing in Pennsylvania.
		But if you're in one of these swing states that has big potential to swing the election, I think we're going to have to go to the callers and just get updates, boots on the ground, what you're hearing, what you're seeing.
		Maybe you were there in Bucks County, Pennsylvania when these shenanigans happened.
		We'll play the videos and showing that.
		So still a lot to get to.
		Before we break into the news on the other side, we have a brand new product at thealexjonesstore.com.
		Here's Alex to tell you more about it.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Many of the supplements available at thealexjonesstore.com are the latest cutting edge, highest rated game changers that have been discovered through research.
		And that's wonderful.
		But many of the products there are known, tried-and-true staples like Elderberry.
		It's just that ours is high quality, very strong, concentrated, and at a competitive price, especially if you get more than one model, then it's some of the best prices you'll find anywhere, and your purchase funds are operations against the globalists, a 360 win.
		So get your concentrated Elderberry, particularly right now in the fall and winter, and you take it as a preventative ahead of time and what the wives tales said hundreds of years ago now with modern science we know it boosts your immune system it's antiviral so now high quality ultimate elderberry scientific name Sambuscus available right now at thealexjonesstore.com it's good for your body and it funds the info war thealexjonesstore.com All right,
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		ladies and gentlemen, let's start to just pile drive through these headlines, then we'll get into the video clips.
		Again, though, Kamala Harris, we called it, by the way, and they were showing the video.
		When our guest was on, I said, hey, Harris has nobody at this event.
		Get the buses lined up.
		Bus them in.
		And then the buses started showing up.
		The buses started showing up in Washington, D.C. for this Harris rally that was about to be a complete dud.
		What a joke.
unidentified		What an absolute joke.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, let's see how many buses, let's see how many people they can bus in to this Harris event at the Ellipse, but they can't bus in a million, so she's not going to come close to what Trump did, with probably the biggest crowd in the history of politics, probably.
		I mean, probably the biggest crowd in the history of D.C. was Trump's speech at the Ellipsis, and then, you know, the overflow, basically, and what was at the Capitol and everything else, but...
		Folks, we saw the scenes earlier, and there was nobody there.
		And now the buses have arrived.
		And so we'll see if it's enough.
		And I don't know if you guys want to put that video back on the screen that you were showing earlier.
		But the buses have literally lined up now with the Democrats to make it look like Harris can draw a crowd.
		When they bus them in, it's all paid for.
		You'll probably give them lunch and everything else.
		Who knows?
		Maybe a paycheck.
		But we called it.
		That was the only way anybody was going to show up for Kamala Harris at the ellipsis today.
		And then, sure enough, there were the buses.
		There they are, ladies and gentlemen.
		Look at that.
		Right on time.
		These people are so predictable.
		Alright, so, you know, we don't need to spend much more time on that.
		Alright, let's look at these headlines, shall we?
		As we said earlier, J.D. Vance has now announced he's going to be going on Joe Rogan.
		That's going to be tomorrow.
		This is really, look, said it when Trump picked Vance.
		It wasn't my pick, but give him a chance.
		I've given him a chance, and he has, I mean, I'd say A. I'd say J.D. Vance is like A minus A right now as far as the vice presidential pick.
		He's just so relatable.
		He's just so smooth.
		He can handle himself with the media.
		He doesn't really make mistakes.
		He comes off genuine.
		He's everything they wish Tim Walz was, really.
		And, you know, I'll admit I give him a little boost of favorability because he kind of represents my age group, my demographic, which doesn't really get much play in politics.
		Definitely not in the White House, so that'll be good.
		Vance on Rogan, I think, is going to be solid.
		Looking forward to that.
		Meanwhile, Harris regrets not going on Rogan, but of course we all know that she can't do three hours.
		Now, keep this in mind as they're publishing the stories basically attacking Rogan.
		Rogan says he rejected Harris' campaign's interview conditions.
		Kamala Harris was in Houston, ladies and gentlemen.
		Houston is a two and a half hour drive from Austin.
		She could have come to Austin and done Rogan.
		She was scared.
		She was scared.
		She didn't want to do Rogan.
		She was scared.
		She could have come to Austin, Texas and done the Joe Rogan show.
		She was scared.
		Then she saw Trump's numbers on the Rogan show.
		And she said, okay, well, we got to do Rogan now.
		But she wouldn't go to Austin.
		And she said, oh, Rogan, you have to come to me.
		And I'm only going to do an hour.
		Those were the demands.
		And of course, I don't think, has Rogan ever done anything on the road like that?
		He always does his stuff in studio.
		I don't think Rogan ever does a Rogan show on the road.
		So he said, well, no, we're not going to do that.
		So they're attacking Rogan.
		Here's what Rogan said.
		For the record, the Harris campaign has not passed on doing the podcast.
		They offered a date for Tuesday, but I would have had to travel to her and they only wanted to do an hour.
		I strongly feel the best way to do it is in the studio in Austin.
		My sincere wish is to have a nice conversation and get to know her as a human being.
		I really hope we can make it happen.
	So it's go on the Rogan show for three hours or bust.
	Kamala, Kamala, Kamala.
	Will she show up?
	Vance is doing it.
	What about Walls?
	Will Walls and Harris do three hours?
	Maybe they go as a support group.
	They'll hold hands.
	It'll be so...
	It's just...
	I don't think they will.
	I don't think they will.
	They know it's probably too big of a risk if it's over an hour.
	And if it's not in their home field, if it's at Rogan's home field, no.
	I don't think so, ladies and gentlemen.
	I don't think so.
	Um...
	More on the election here.
	RNC lawyers send a letter to Pennsylvania officials saying that voters are being denied at the polls.
	This story is developing.
	This is crazy what's going on here.
	On behalf of all Pennsylvania voters, we ask that you provide the promised support immediately.
	October 29th, 2024 is the last day to request a mail-in ballot in person at a county election office.
	If you truly believe that every vote is equally precious, as you stated on October 26th, 2024, we urge you to act with the necessary urgency so that every voter in this Commonwealth has the same experience enjoyed by Governor Shapiro.
	No voters should be turned away, told an office is closing early, or they cannot be accommodated if they appear during the posted business hours.
	And this is what's going on.
	If a voter visits a Board of Elections office to request fill out and return a mail-in ballot anywhere in the Keystone State during the posted office hours, they should be provided the opportunity.
	No one should be told to go home.
	If they get in line before the posted closing time, each voter should be able to request fill out and return their mail-in ballot.
	In a recent CNN interview, you assured the country that the presidential election in 2024 is going to be free, fair, safe and secure.
	Kindly use your position to provide any and all support necessary so that the Board of Elections and all 67 counties provide the same opportunity to everyday Pennsylvanians as enjoyed by the governor and live up to the promises that you made to the American people at large.
	Now, all kinds of craziness happens.
	We can go to the videos.
	That we have on the ground.
	And, you know, Trump has basically issued multiple harsh warnings via posts saying they're watching for voter fraud.
	If you get caught, you're going to prison.
	He made this statement earlier today.
	Law enforcement is all over the great commonwealth of Pennsylvania looking at and for voter fraud.
	Anybody that cheats in the election is going to jail.
	And then you have this on the ground from James Blair.
	Pennsylvania voters...
	This was this morning when the shenanigans started happening.
	Pennsylvania voters must stay in line on the final day of early voting and cast their vote.
	Do not let elections officials turn you away during the operating hours they posted.
	If they disenfranchise you, submit a report to our lawyers through pa.protectthevote.com Now there's multiple reports of Democrats posing as voting poll workers When they're not legitimately poll watchers, they're just Democrats, I guess, engaging in voter intimidation?
	James Blair reporting again.
	The Democrats are running around in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, with badges, trying to pretend like they are election officials.
	These are not officials' intimidation tactics.
	Okay, now, we've got some videos from the ground here.
	Of these long lines that are just crazy how long they are.
	And then one Trump supporter, who's also a delegate for Trump, got arrested telling people to stay in the lines that if you're there on time, you can still vote.
	And they arrested her.
	So you can be a Democrat and run around and telling people to go home, but if you tell people, no, you don't go home, you stay in the line, it's still open, you get arrested.
	Here she is being arrested in clip 12.
unidentified		Wow.
		That's crazy.
		You locked her up?
		That is insane, man.
		She is not influencing people.
		She is not at all.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And there they are cheering.
		Now, I've actually reached out to her to try to get her on the show to tell her story.
		Haven't heard back yet.
		We'll see if we can get her on.
		And then this is what they did today.
		The cops went and shut down.
		This was before they closed.
		They went and shut down the lines in clip 10.
unidentified		It's 2.41 and they are ending the line.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So all types of craziness going on in Pennsylvania, including one Pennsylvania woman who tried to vote, found out that, oh, someone already voted for her.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Here she is telling her story, clip 11.
unidentified		My opportunity to vote this election and actually have some meaning behind it has been snatched away from me.
		So yesterday I got a text message saying that I voted, which I did not vote at that moment.
		A couple hours later, I received another text message saying, apologies, you did not vote.
		So that made me head to the polls early.
		Now, when I got there, I waited in line.
		I get up to the table to register and they tell me, you voted already.
		And I showed them the text message.
		I said, no.
		Someone said I voted.
		Then I got another text message saying, apologies, you did not vote.
		And they said, well, there's nothing we could do about it or records show that you voted.
		But I did not vote.
		Here's the screenshots.
		TikTok, please do y'all thing because this is completely illegal.
		I did not vote.
		Yet, the records say I voted.
		Who did I vote for?
		So here's the first text that they sent me yesterday.
		Records show you voted.
		I did not vote.
		I was at work at this time yesterday.
		And then they sent this at 2 o'clock.
		So when I got down there, after receiving those messages, they told me I already voted.
		Who do I talk to concerning this situation?
		Because I did not vote yet.
		And TikTok, please do not remove my video.
		I have proof.
		This is a real story.
		The proof is in my actual phone.
		So please do not delete my video.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And she calls out the TikTok situation because TikTok is censoring all kinds of political information right now ahead of the election.
		Oh, but see, I'm bad.
		And they say, oh, it's the next stop the steel movement because I'm reporting on this stuff.
		In the Atlantic.
		By the way, what's going on here?
		Clip 14.
		What's going on in Lansdale, Pennsylvania?
		Clip 14.
unidentified		But you can vote early if the printer would work.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh.
unidentified		Let me just walk on by, see what's going on.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Printers failed, huh?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Convenient.
unidentified		What happened?
		The printer doesn't work, so they don't have the ballots.
		So it's giving out these forms to be filled out, and then if you fill them out, when the printer gets here in about an hour, You can stay in line if you want to.
		He's expecting 45 minutes to an hour.
		Thank you for that.
		But he's bringing these forms out.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What an absolute disaster.
		Pennsylvania, you're a joke.
		Just outside of Philadelphia, too.
		Yeah, shenanigans all over the place.
		But don't report on it.
		Everything's great.
		Everything's fine.
unidentified		We want to talk about problems printing ballots in Nevada County.
		With 12 days until Election Day, officials there are working around the clock to try and fix this situation.
		Your reporter covering Nevada County, Kayla Moeller, is live for us in front of the elections office getting answers on what's being done about this, Kayla.
		Well, Marley and Hunter, the Nevada County elections first realized something was wrong on Monday.
		The next day they diagnosed the problem, but the error is specific to vote by mail ballots.
		However, they aren't quite sure exactly how many of the 77,000 issued ballots are affected, but they do have a plan to re-scan the ones that are.
		A lot of the public is very nervous about About the process, about the results.
		A vote by mail ballot error has some Nevada County residents concerned.
		County elections realized something was wrong on Monday.
		Their machines weren't properly reading all the ballots.
		They called the Secretary of State and their printing service and diagnosed the issue as an ink overspray on some of the barcodes.
		Some of our ballots, if you look really closely and you use a magnifying glass, You will see that there is imperfections in the barcodes.
		I want to show you what these ballots look like.
		If you take a look here, we're covering some private information, but the one on the left has already been processed.
		The problem is with these barcodes, and the one on the right needs to be re-scanned.
		But as you can see, They look very similar.
		We will go ahead and use a report to see, okay, which pages did not go through.
		We'll pull those out, and we mark them as to be re-scanned.
		So we have a different bin, we have a different colored piece of paper that sort of makes it really clear.
		Election officials say the printer error will not affect the accuracy, but it will slow down their operations.
		They'll be walking around the clock to certify the election results on time.
		I trust the process.
		Nice.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Nice mail-in drop box you got there.
		All right, so there you go.
		Oh, a mail-in.
		Oh, so, you know, we got all these...
		Gee, it seems like, you know, maybe just paper ballots, hand counting.
		Seems to have the least amount of issues.
		Seems to get done in one night.
		But yeah, you throw all these different other things in there and there's all kinds of room and space for shenanigans, don't you see?
		You know, one of the people on Fox News that I think...
		Would have the courage to even question the results or integrity would be Jesse Waters.
		Here he is last night covering the Democrats' legal fight to stop mail-in drop box surveillance in clip 13.
jesse watters ▲ ● ▼		Today in Georgia, a judge ruled that election officials have to certify results, even if voter fraud is suspected.
		And around the state, Democrats are suing to prevent drop box surveillance, hand counting ballots, and voter ID protections.
		Why are Democrats trying to make elections less secure?
		Especially while many states across the country are finding thousands of people who aren't citizens on the voter rolls.
		Like in Virginia, where Governor Yunkin removed more than 6,000 non-citizens from the rolls.
		The Biden-Harris administration didn't like that.
		The Justice Department is now suing Virginia for cleaning up the voter rolls.
		Something Virginia governors have been doing for years.
unidentified		Why is it that anyone could argue that a process that removes non-citizens off of our voter rolls is anything else other than common sense and constitutional?
		This is a law that's been on our books since 2006.
		It was a law that was signed by then Democrat Governor Tim Kaine.
		This is why I find this to be a very, very unreal moment that is stunning that they filed this suit 25 days before a presidential election, when in fact this has been going on in accordance with our constitution, the federal constitution and state law since 2006.
jesse watters ▲ ● ▼		It's simple.
		We just want free and fair elections.
		Democrats are trying to loosen the rules and get Republicans.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it is stunning.
		It is unreal.
		So let's just admit what it is.
		Democrats are trying to steal the election.
		Just say it.
		It doesn't hurt.
		Just say it.
		We can't do hand counting.
		It takes too long.
		And that's why we need to do mail-in ballots that will take weeks or months to count.
		Yes, okay.
		Sure, sure you do.
		That's what it is.
		Totally believable.
		All right.
		We are into the third and final hour now of the Infowars War Room.
		Your election headquarters.
		And there's too much happening on the ground.
		I haven't gone to the phone lines this week or late last week.
		And I said we're going to get human intel from the ground in these swing states.
		So I do want to open up the phone lines today.
		Specifically in these swing states where all of these big developments are happening.
		So we're going to be looking at Georgia.
		We're going to be looking at Nevada.
		We're going to be looking at Virginia.
		And maybe most importantly today, Pennsylvania, where all of these shenanigans are going on in that very important swing state.
		So, the number to call in, 877-789-2539.
		877-789-2539.
		But only on the election in these swing states.
		That's the calls we're looking for.
		And I'll probably put Pennsylvania to the front of the line today, since that's where most of the news is.
		Number is on the screen.
		Give us a call.
		We'll get the lines all loaded up.
		And I'll cover some of this other news and other video clips while we get you up and on the air.
		All right, let's go here.
		Democrat Senate campaign organization fires employee accused of tampering with Montana mail-in ballot box.
		A Democrat employee tampering with a mail-in ballot box.
		Okay.
		Mail-in ballot box set on fire in Washington, Oregon, and Arizona.
		Three states, the ballot boxes are on fire.
		What's going to happen to your vote?
		Who knows?
		Nobody knows.
		Nobody cares.
		Doesn't matter.
		Who knows?
		It'll be for Harris now.
		Maybe it was for Trump then, but now it's for Harris.
		And there's no surveillance either because the Democrats made that illegal.
		So you can't have surveillance over the mail and drop boxes because they got caught with their cheating and their rigging by Dinesh D'Souza and 2,000 mules.
		So then they just made it illegal to surveil them.
		Now you got them on fire and all kinds of problems and people tampering and there's no footage, conveniently.
		Because, well, that's illegal to surveil that, you know.
		Because then how are people going to cheat?
		It's election integrity.
		It's protecting democracy.
		A Pennsylvania Democrat who uses she-her pronouns arrested for threatening Trump a day before his rally in the state.
		This person looks like Tim Walz in a wig.
		A clearly deranged individual said he'd like to shoot the guy.
		He'd like to shoot Trump.
		State college man arrested after Trump threats.
		Frankly, I hope someone would get him.
		So this is just another deranged, delusional, psychotic liberal Democrat.
	That belong in mental institutions.
	Nowhere near a ballot box.
	Maybe they don't have to go to a ballot box.
	They'll get 10 mail-in ballots.
	They'll vote 10 times.
	Knowing how the Democrats work.
	You want to see?
	Look at another example.
	You want to talk about Trump derangement.
	I mean, this is just pathetic, folks.
	This guy was protesting Trump.
	I believe this was in Pennsylvania.
	And a street reporter goes out.
	I mean, how do you even?
	Just listen to what he says.
	Clip 16.
	What's your biggest obstacle in life right now?
	My biggest obstacle in life?
unidentified		Trump.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Trump, absolutely.
		Do you wake up and think about him?
		Yes, constantly, everyday.
		Do you go to sleep and think about him?
		Yes, everyday.
unidentified		Are you in love with him?
		I hate his guts.
		Wow.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Totally normal people.
		Totally normal.
		Here's another one.
		It looks like some college lacrosse players, a couple girls that play college lacrosse, and a white dude for Harris.
		I mean, folks, I don't even...
		This is like...
		This is like out of a cartoon or something.
		White dude for Harris harassing college girls because they like Trump.
		Clip 18.
unidentified		Go Trump.
		What do you think about that?
		Go Trump?
		Yeah.
		You're stupid.
		Okay.
		What do you play?
		You're like, attack?
		No, don't touch.
		Look at this shit.
		No thanks.
		Look at this shit.
		I play lacrosse.
		I skateboard.
		Bye.
		Okay.
		So now you're talking shit to me.
		No.
		I went to Stanford.
		How old are you?
		How old are you?
		30, 40.
		I make $500,000 a year.
		What do you make?
		Why are you here?
		Why?
		Because I'm here.
		It's a public sidewalk, bitch.
		Okay.
		Get used to it.
		Have a good night.
		You play this.
		I skateboard.
		I was at lacrosse.
		Are you attack or forward?
		Who cares?
		You guys suck.
		Bye.
		Bye.
		Go to Stanford.
		Go to Stanford.
		Hold on.
		Hold on.
		Only 100 people apply for Stanford.
		Only four get in.
		Nice.
		Not you guys.
		Bye, loser!
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's a grown man harassing college girls.
		He says he's 30, 40, so I don't know.
		Does that mean he's 30 or 40?
		Look, I'm not trying to be mean, because I actually have a heart, and it actually kind of hurts my heart when I see people suffering like that and that really need help, and he clearly needs help.
		But I mean, you look at that first guy that wakes up and thinks about hating Trump, and then you look about that guy who's, I mean, he's basically like retarded, and these are your Democrat voters.
		These are deranged, mentally ill people.
		They're truly mentally ill.
		They're truly completely brainwashed.
		They're broken people.
		And it's depressing.
		It's sad.
		And it's just like, we just get used to this.
		And really, these people need help.
		And, you know, it kind of reminds me of this other video I have here.
		And you guys can just roll the B-roll.
		It's fine.
		But this is a homeless woman.
		I think it was in Seattle.
		And she's clearly mentally disturbed, and apparently, you know, the rumor on the streets is that she's just been sex trafficked so much and just abused drugs, she's just gone.
		And, you know, this should break our hearts.
		This woman needs help.
		And she's having, like, a panic attack on the streets, breaking down.
		And we bring in millions of illegal immigrants to get free everything, and we do nothing to help our own people.
		And we get so numb to it.
		It's kind of sad, but we get so numb to it.
		I remember, I mean, as young as I can remember, And I'd go downtown for ball games with my dad, and you'd have the normal homeless people sitting out there in downtown St.
		Louis outside of Busch Stadium.
		A couple in particular.
		There was one woman that had no arms or legs in a wheelchair with a cup between her legs.
		I mean, it's like vivid in my memory.
		There was another guy who would always just sit on the ground who I think was missing a leg too, asking for money.
		And you see that when you're a kid, and it's like, really, it hurts your heart.
		It kind of depresses you.
		It's like a shock value thing.
		Like, why aren't people helping?
		And, you know, some people put themselves in the position, but it's like, we just get numb to it.
		Like, oh, yeah, homeless, deranged people, whatever.
		Oh, yeah, deranged lunatics, psychotics, roaming around, you know, normal society, harassing people.
		This is not what an advanced civilization looks like.
		This is a collapsing third world that we're going into.
		And we're just numb.
		We're just numb.
		Just like, oh yeah, just some deranged lunatic liberal harassing college girls at college campuses.
		It looks like he pretends to do a gun motion put up to their head.
		Oh yeah, some deranged Democrat at a Capitol saying, I wake up every day and think about how much I hate Trump.
		These people are broken humans.
		They're broken humans.
		And it does actually hurt my heart.
		Because, you know, you're a human before you get involved in the politics.
		And it just hurts your heart, man.
		Because we don't have to live in a civilization like this.
		This has all been done by design.
		It's just the weaponized world.
		Just a civilization weaponized against you.
		The chemicals and the food and the water.
		The propaganda on the TV in the school system.
		And it just destroys people.
		It just breaks people.
		And it's sad.
		It's sad.
		But we just get used to it.
		We're just numb to it and we're just like, yep, this is how it has to be.
		No, it doesn't have to be that way, actually.
		It doesn't have to be that way.
	It wasn't always that way.
	It was actually never that way before in America until recently.
	Even in the worst times this country has ever gone through, the Great Depression.
	I mean, you might say the worst would maybe be the stock market crash when people were jumping off of buildings.
	But it has never been like this before in the history of this country, folks.
	Homeless shanty towns, mass homelessness, mass derangement, mass drug addiction, mass mental illness.
	It's never been like this way before in our country.
	It doesn't have to be this way.
	And there's many things that I think about and I think we probably can never fix.
	Or it's going to take years to turn around.
	But we are not heading in the right direction.
	And just bringing back basic common sense policy, bringing back peace, bringing back prosperity, bringing back the opportunities will at least help.
	But really people at the end of the day either need to help themselves or somebody has to help them.
	And just nobody helps these people.
	And the Democrats would rather help somebody that comes in from a third world and give them free stuff with the hopes that they'll vote Democrat for the next 20-30 years.
	And then their kids will vote Democrat for the next 60 years.
	And so that's where we're at, unfortunately.
	That's where we're at.
	Alright, I'm going to take a couple calls.
	Let's start in Pennsylvania.
	As I said, I wanted to start with Pennsylvania.
	Let's go to James in Pennsylvania.
	All right, James, what are we seeing on the ground, giving all the news that we're reporting today?
unidentified		There's a huge groundswell.
		Trump's support all day.
		Federnak is completely right.
		That's why they're nervous.
		There's no way this guy leaves this state outside of Philly and Pittsburgh.
		I mean, there's no support for that woman anywhere.
		It's a joke.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So let me kind of hone in on this for a second.
		And again, I go back to the numbers here.
		Trump got 2.97 million votes in Pennsylvania in 2016.
		He then got 3.37 million, almost half a million more, but lost to Biden, who got even more than that.
		So what happens if Trump gets 3.5 million votes in Pennsylvania and Harris gets 3.6?
		I mean, is anybody going to buy this?
		I mean, where does it go if they take Pennsylvania from Trump?
unidentified		Well, considering that they're already burning ballot boxes, and supposedly there is a way to track that to the very end, it'd be interesting to find out.
		My wife's doing a mail-in.
		I'm still yet to vote in person.
		I guess everyone at the end of the day is going to have a paper in their hand that says who they voted for, right?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So you're going on election day, or are you going to rush down there on the last day to early vote, or are you going on election day then?
unidentified		I'm early voting, prior to election day.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Isn't today the last day to early vote or is it just a mail-in vote?
unidentified		No, vote in person you can do up until election day in certain places.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Okay.
		So you have until Friday.
		Okay, so what about the local media?
		What is the vibe in the local media?
unidentified		A total trashing Trump.
		You would think that Fox News and ABC are all promoting Kamala Harris, which they are openly.
		That's no surprise.
		All of these local channels push anti-Trump rhetoric constantly.
		There is no give with these people.
		It's amazing that this guy has any support at all.
		You would think if you turn on the television that it's non-existent, but you actually get out on the ground and drive around and...
		There's no support for this woman at all, period.
		It's a complete joke that she would get three-point or however many million votes.
		Even the fact that Biden got that many million votes is a joke.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, of course.
		I mean, they all came in at 3.30 in the morning when you went to bed.
		I just...
		I don't know, man.
		Nobody stopped him.
		Nobody did anything about it in 2020.
		So I just don't, I don't know.
		I don't know why they wouldn't do it again.
		Quite frankly, the signs to me point they're going to steal Pennsylvania from Trump.
		But you think it's going to be too big to rig?
		Or it'll be too obvious?
		Or, I mean, what do you think?
		Final conclusion.
unidentified		It's going to be too big to rig.
		It's going to be, and it's going to be so obvious.
		All of these major political people, non-political people are coming out.
		They don't want to say it.
		No one wants to say it.
		But at the end of the day, we all know what's going to happen, right?
		I mean, are we all just going to let this country fall to a bunch of communist Democrats?
		I mean, is it a joke or not?
		Are the elections real or not?
		I mean, I know who I voted for.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, you know, people always tend to lag.
		And I talked about this earlier, and James, I thank you for the call.
		But, again...
		You have the House GOP today breaking news that the Biden laptop was real.
		I mean, the crew found a video that from February 2023, I know obviously we covered it 2021, 2020 even.
		And so it's just like...
		Cool.
		So, okay, so the Democrats will win Pennsylvania, and then in 2028, the Republicans will say, hey, the Democrats stole Pennsylvania for Harris in 2024.
		Like, oh, great.
		Wow, that does so much for me now.
		This is why nobody fears Republicans politically, because they're spineless.
		I mean, they might fear Trump, but it's just a joke.
		Oh, the Biden laptop's real.
		Really?
		Thank you.
		That's 2020 election news.
		What the hell are you doing now?
		No, it doesn't even matter anymore.
		Are you going to prosecute someone?
		What are you going to do about all the issues we're having across the swing states?
		Oh, nothing.
		We're talking about the Biden laptop today.
		I mean, give me a break.
		Let's go to Cliff.
		Philadelphia suburbs.
		Cliff, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Owen.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Howdy.
unidentified		Yeah, I was just calling.
		I can't remember if it was yesterday or Friday.
		You had done a report on, I guess it was the election integrity guy from Lancaster outside of Philly.
		And there's no way that you were saying that they were ahead in the blue.
		And it's all Amish and farmers and everything.
		When you drive out there, it's complete Trump signs everywhere.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So is this like North Philly or like West Philly?
unidentified		We are west of Philadelphia.
unidentified		Lancaster is probably, I don't know, 40 minutes from Philadelphia.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And it's just all farmland.
unidentified		It's all farmland.
		It's all Trump, Amish farmers.
		Yeah, when I heard you saying that, I'm like, I couldn't believe what you were saying because it doesn't make any sense.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, look, this is early voting and absentee voting numbers, mail-in ballot numbers that we have.
		The Democrats are up about 400,000 right now.
		And, I mean, we can put the thing back on the board.
		I mean, the exact area you're talking about is blue.
		It is, I mean, so, I mean, it's mail and absentee ballots.
		So I guess, you know, Democrats are more inclined to do that, you could argue.
		But according to this early data, which is over a million votes, that is a blue area.
unidentified		It's not blue.
		That's a lie.
		Absolutely.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, do you think that means people are going to show up on Election Day?
unidentified		If they don't have their votes stolen.
		I was just listening to you posted the lady from the TikTok thing.
		I got the same text saying I already voted, and then they texted me back saying that it was a mistake.
		So is there any way I can check to see if I'm still eligible to vote, or did somebody already steal my vote?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why are you even getting texts that you've already voted?
		I've never heard that before.
		I've never got a text that I voted.
		Have you?
unidentified		No, not at all.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I voted today.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Nobody sent me a text.
unidentified		It said I had already voted, and if I wanted information on a mail-in ballot, which if I already voted, why would I be asking for a mail-in ballot?
unidentified		And then, I don't know, five, ten minutes later, I got a text saying, oh, it was sent in there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that is...
		I don't know.
		I can't even wrap my head around it.
unidentified		Anything I can do to find out?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, you know, I would say...
		Look, I'd say there's two routes.
		And we've heard about similar issues.
		You know, honestly, you might call your local news.
		And report it to your local news because people actually did that and then the local news kind of follows up and they have different strings they can pull to get answers and maybe probably put you on the air to tell your story.
		We've played other local news reports similar to what you're saying.
		Otherwise, your best bet would be to go to your...
		If there's not any information in that text that you got, go to the Board of Elections, send them an email...
		You know, you got to pretty much just exhaust all resources at that point.
unidentified		Yeah, I saw you play that and my heart just sank.
		I'm like, we've been running all over going to all the Trump rallies.
		We went and saw Tucker and Alex Elton Redding.
		And it's just deflating to think that you're being snuffed.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, it's happening here in Texas, too.
		I've never heard of this.
		I've never heard of people getting a text saying they voted.
		I mean, what the hell even is that?
unidentified		No idea.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So these are all kinds of questions.
		Yeah, I mean, look, you got to exhaust all your resources.
		I'd go to the local news.
		I'd call Board of Elections, send emails.
		I mean, you could go to your polling location.
		That might be the most painstaking because you might have to wait in line and you don't even know what the result's going to be.
		But yeah, they're obvious.
		You know, if nothing else, it's just voter intimidation stuff.
		It's just trying to stop you from voting stuff, maybe.
unidentified		Well, I guess I'll try to do the legwork this week in between work.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I mean, again, you can just go show up.
		See, and that's the problem.
		Because then if you go on election day, well, now you're screwed, right?
		So it's kind of like you almost have to go early vote now, because you might show up on election day and they tell you you can't vote, and then it's just like, oh, what do you do then?
		It's over.
unidentified		I'm not a big fan of the mail-in or early voting.
		I like to vote on voting day.
		Yeah.
		But I'm going to have to go and inquire at least.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, best of luck, Cliff, and maybe we'll get an update for you because I do intend to continue to open phone lines for human intelligence on the ground in these swing states, so I appreciate your call.
		Let's go to Darcy in Virginia.
		Darcy, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Owen.
		Thank you for taking my call.
		So I think that, I believe it was since Obama in 2008, Virginia hasn't gone back to red in a long time.
		But I live in near Charlottesville, which is a very, very blue area.
		And I've seen an overwhelming amount of Trump signs, more than I ever saw in 2020, more than I ever saw in 2016.
		It's a lot more.
		And I drive around the area quite a bit, too, in the extending counties.
		And, I mean, it's the same thing.
		But the extending counties are a lot more red than Charlottesville proper, of course.
		But I really think that it's up to Northern Virginia whether or not we go blue this year.
		I mean, they are overwhelming, and I think it's one of the more liberal areas in the country even compared to California and New York.
		So, yeah, I mean, I think that there's a really good shot.
		I have a...
		A big doubt that Kamala would win Virginia.
		But, I mean, anything's possible.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, here's the thing that Youngkin and his team figured out.
		And the strategy was you overwhelm the...
		Major metropolitan areas with the suburbs.
		You gotta get the highest voter turnout in the suburbs that you've ever seen.
		That's what Youngkin did.
		That's how he was able to win the race.
		So, I mean, if the Republicans just repeat that strategy, I do think they can win Virginia.
		The numbers are there for them.
		You know, honestly, the news of the voter rolls and putting ineligible and illegal voters on them, I think Youngkin will likely have the final say and the final victory there.
		But it just shows the Democrats, they are trying to do everything they can to try to take that state, and they wouldn't be doing that if they thought they had a sure victory there.
unidentified		Yeah, I agree.
		I think that there is, especially like you said, the suburbs, because that's where I've seen the majority of the swing, at least personally.
		I grew up in a very rural part of Virginia, and it was always pretty red.
		But it's the suburbs that have been especially blue for the last...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I would say a couple of years.
		And Yunkin swung them and got major voter turnout for Republicans.
		And I think Trump needs to win Virginia to win, personally.
		All right, we got a couple other on-the-ground voters in Pennsylvania that dealt directly with some of the shenanigans today.
		Let's start with Marnie in Bucks County.
		That's where one of the videos we played was.
		Marnie, what did you witness today?
		Tell us your story.
unidentified		Yes, hi.
		First of all, thanks for all you do.
		Second, I got into line at 1130 this morning, and it was already wrapped around the block.
		I'm in Bucks County, PA, and we vote at our local courthouse.
		So, stood in line at 1130, moving extremely slow.
		Get into the door of the courthouse and you realize why.
		I mean, first of all, you have to go through security, which is, you know, obviously to be expected.
		But you get in there, they let six people at a time vote.
		And I feel that it partly has to be some type of voter intimidation because the majority of the people that are going to drive by there are going to see the line wrapped around the building and just keep on going.
		Now, to, you know, say something about your previous caller, today was the last day to be able to vote in person.
		Now, the next thing, you could mail in a ballot and take your chance in Pennsylvania, but that was the last day for what they call on-demand voting.
		And we didn't walk out of that building until a quarter to three.
		So three hours and 15 minutes to vote.
		And as we walked out, we heard people starting to complain that they were shutting the line down and they were not allowing them to stand in line to vote anymore.
		Now, as far as I know, the courthouse does close at five o'clock.
		So it's not like your regular day of voting when you vote in person where you would be able to stay there until, you know, whenever, as long as you got there on time.
		I don't know quite how it works, but I do know that they did start shutting down the line at a quarter to three.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, you know, what's crazy, too, is, you know, I listen to some of the things you got to go through.
		Okay, so you have to go through security.
		They only let six people in.
		I mean, right there, you're already going to deal with just ridiculously long wait times, you know.
		Honestly, I only dealt with a long line voting in Austin, Texas once since I've been voting here.
		2016, I was absentee Missouri, and then I switched my voter registration to Texas.
		So 2018 to this election, I've been voting in Texas.
		I've only dealt with a long line once.
		I mean, and we got so many.
		I think it probably just has to do with locations to vote.
		I mean, there are so many places to vote in Travis County.
		I mean, just in like a five-mile radius, you might have like 20 places to go vote.
		And so it's been relatively stress-free for me.
		I don't know if the crew has had the same experience voting here.
		Yeah, the crew says pretty much mostly the same experience.
		So, I mean, is that how it is everywhere in Pennsylvania?
unidentified		Because I think this is the first election where more people are actually voting early in person.
		This is not something that's a normal procedure.
		You usually would vote on Election Day.
		And I voted on Election Day and have never waited in a three-hour line to vote on Election Day.
		But my feel for the crowd, majority people in front of us, Trump supporters, people behind us, Trump supporters, the majority of the people, I feel we're there, and I think it's because the Trump campaign team is encouraging you to vote early.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
unidentified		So that's why I got up, and that's why I did it, because normally I would just vote on Election Day.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I think the strategy here is, you know, it's proven to be a good strategy because you could show up on Election Day and not be allowed to vote, and then you're screwed.
unidentified		Exactly.
		And you don't know what's going to happen.
		I'm not to sound like a, you know, conspiracy theorist, but I wasn't taking the chance this year.
		And I said, that's it.
		I'm going in.
		I did, and it's done now, and you do get a...
		I mean, look, you still, I guess, take a chance.
		Like anything, you fill out a...
		You really go there, and you're registering for a mail-in ballot, but they hand it to you.
		They literally hand you the ballot.
		You fill it out.
		You steal it in two different envelopes.
		You hand it back to them, and then I got an email saying that my vote has been, I guess...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So that's how you early vote?
unidentified		That's how we early vote here.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That is insane!
		This whole thing is like, they make it as difficult as possible.
		I walked in and voted like I would on election day.
unidentified		No, it's not like that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh my gosh!
unidentified		So this, my location that I could choose from to vote, there would be one location and it would be at least 15 miles away.
unidentified		So there are very few and far between.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That is crazy.
unidentified		Very few and far between.
unidentified		That's Pennsylvania.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, Pennsylvania does a horrible job running its elections.
		I mean, I'll give Texas credit.
		I mean, in fact, look, I've only lived in Missouri and Texas, both red states, and I have never had a problem voting.
		I've never had to go through any of this rigmarole you're talking about.
		And, I mean, again, I walked, I voted on election days and I voted early.
		I walked into the polling location and voted just like I would any other time.
		No problem, no wait, nothing.
		And there's like 20 locations near where I would go that I could go vote.
		I mean, that's insane.
		Pennsylvania needs to overhaul their entire system.
		What a joke.
unidentified		I totally agree.
		And not to change the subject, but just to mention another terrible thing.
		I was just watching your clip there on the homeless population in some of the states.
		I just lost my sister a month ago to a fentanyl overdose.
		And if they don't change something in this country, what's happening?
		Because they keep giving money to everybody that comes in, but yet there's no rehabs to go to.
		There's nothing, there's no hell for these people on the street.
		And it's the most tragic thing I've ever seen.
		I just wanted to say that, that people are just so affected by that.
		So this country needs a big change, and I hope Donald Trump gets in and takes care of that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, you're right.
		And again, this country never dealt with it, at least not at this level.
		ever before in this country's history.
		And, you know, it was political correct liberals that got rid of the mental institutions.
		They shut them all down.
		Democrats shut down the mental institutions, which I think you could argue are much needed.
		And they do this deal now where they open up the homeless facilities.
		And depending on where you're at, like here in Austin, they have a giant homeless facility.
		The homeless don't go there because you can't use drugs in the facility.
		So it's just a giant homeless deal.
		And they ran a program here in Texas probably a decade or so ago, and they thought they could solve the homeless problem.
		And they bust the homeless.
		It was kind of like a wink and a nod, like, oh, we're going to do this, but let's just not talk about it.
		And they bust the homeless from Dallas, San Antonio, and Houston all to Austin.
		And they were going to have a huge homeless project here and a big homeless facility.
		But because you can't do drugs in the homeless facility, none of the homeless go there.
		So they all just live on the streets or they go find different woods to live in.
		I mean, you should see some of the homeless encampments here in Austin.
		You wouldn't even believe it.
		Maybe when this election is over and I start reporting on some other stuff, I'll go film some like I have before.
		But they don't go to the homeless shelters because they don't want to have curfews and they want to be able to use drugs.
		And then in the other states, like in Oregon...
		Where they have the homeless shelters in California, and then you can use drugs.
		They're all just bombed out of their minds all day.
		So none of it's helping.
		But we are getting off topic.
		But no, the truth is it's just part of the sickness.
		It's part of the disease that this country is inflicted with.
		Let's go to Dustin in...
		I'm sorry to hear about your sister.
		Let's go to Dustin in Lancaster.
		Dustin, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey Owen, how you doing?
		Good.
		I was listening to the guy earlier about Lancaster.
		We only have about 50,000 Amish here.
		It's a half million people in this county.
		The city district and the suburbs around, it's about 200,000 woke liberals.
		And then the rest is going to be conservatives out in the country.
		So this is right down the middle when you subtract the Amish.
		The whole South Central Pennsylvania area with Dolphin County, York County, Lancaster, Berks with Redding where Tucker just was.
		Last month.
		They're all cities of about 100,000 people with the suburbs, and they're very woke.
		We have a large Latino population in the area.
		They're bringing in more immigrants through Catholic charities and stuff.
		This state is up for grabs.
		Luckily here in this county, our county elections officers were able to find some flaws Pennsylvania seems to be the worst-run election state I've ever seen or heard of.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		This thing sounds like a complete disaster.
unidentified		Unfortunately, it's getting worse, and the mail-in ballots aren't helping.
unidentified		There's not enough Republican vote watchers to be at the polls.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know, I'm convinced there's none.
		Now, they officially have 10 to 1 Democrat-Republican poll watchers, but I don't think that tells the full story.
		I don't think there'll be any Republicans poll-watching in Pennsylvania.
		I don't think, or excuse me, in Philadelphia.
		I don't think there'll be any Republicans poll-watching in Pittsburgh.
		Maybe one all day long.
		So yeah, this is just ripe, man.
		This is just ripe.
unidentified		Yeah, everybody needs to get out and vote.
		The Rust Belt is definitely up for grabs.
		I don't trust the polls.
		They're going to steal it, and we need to get it by the numbers.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, Dustin, thanks for the update.
		Let's go to one more in Pennsylvania.
		Let's go to Phyllis.
		Phyllis, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hi.
		Pennsylvania is not supposed to vote this way.
		Our election, or our Constitution, does not allow for mail-in ballots.
		They only allow absentee ballots.
		We're not allowed to early vote.
		Therefore, the only place that you can early vote since the lockdown is at your At your election county office, and that is in the county building of every county.
		We've never had early voting before.
		This is all crazy.
		We're not allowed to have mail-in ballots.
		That's against our Constitution.
		I tried to tell this to Jack Posobiec when he was in Butler on August 5th talking to whoever it was he was talking to.
		This is totally off the record in Pennsylvania.
		That's the reason why they did this.
		Josh Shapiro, as an AG in 2020, did this so that he could win the gubernatorial and so that Trump could lose.
		He did this on purpose because everyone knows Pennsylvania leaves it all.
		If you win Pennsylvania, you'll win it all.
		And they did this on purpose.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, look, let me kind of...
		Let me kind of respond to some things, and you can finish your rant here.
		Look, you know, I don't ride in the Trump circles, and so there's kind of this...
		There's kind of this vibe, if you will, inside of the Trump circle.
		And look, I get it, but it's basically like...
		I'm not sure anybody's really telling Trump like it is.
		It's not that he doesn't understand it.
		Obviously, he does, but...
		Clearly, the action that the Republicans, the RNC has taken to get to this point with a week to the election has not been near enough.
		Clearly.
		And you would think there'd be better strategy.
		When you have Musk focusing on Pennsylvania, you have probably more get-out-the-vote voter registration efforts in Pennsylvania than any other state.
		Obviously, Scott Pressler being one example, but there's many other examples.
		And so you'd think that they would match that with the actual election integrity as far as the process of the election, and clearly nothing was done there.
		And I bet I could take these calls all week.
		And so now it's just like nobody, it's too late to really do anything at this point.
		The election is already ongoing, and what do you tell Trump, or what do you tell Trump's campaign team that's been just giving him all the great news, and then you say, hey, look, we got a week to the election, and this is a disaster in Pennsylvania.
		But I guess nobody wants to really tell him that.
		I don't know.
		Maybe this information will get out there.
unidentified		And you have to understand that we're not allowed the voting or the casting or the, I'm sorry, the tabulation of the vote will not happen until November 5th at 7 a.m.
		That's when they'll start to count.
		So that whole picture that you see when you put up that map, that's just who are Democrats and Republicans who have turned in their ballots.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Right, right.
		And, you know, potentially independents.
		It doesn't actually say who they voted for.
		It's just what party they requested ballots from.
unidentified		Well, you can go to a site that'll tell you that.
unidentified		But what I'm trying to say to you is there are a lot of Democrats that are voting Republican.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, that might be the one thing that they don't account for.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, that could be the saving grace that might make it too big to rig.
unidentified		That's it, because, you know, I live in Armstrong County.
		There are a few Kamala signs around, but not many.
		Even a broken-down house with junk cars in the front have a big Trump sign, big Trump flag.
		So, you know, you have to understand that a lot of people who are Democrats, and I know people in New Jersey who are Democrats, who are going to vote Trump, who voted Trump last time and the time before that.
		So when they just count ballots this way, they're just telling you who the mail-in ballot for the Democrats was and who the mail-in ballot for the Republicans was.
		They're not counting votes yet.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah.
		All right, Phyllis, I appreciate that update.
		I got to take other calls and get to news.
		But I mean, look, this is either going to be the big wake up call on election integrity that the Republicans have been lagging on and conservatives have been lagging on.
unidentified		Thank you.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Or we'll win and we'll see what Trump can do to get this republic going back in the right direction.
		But I mean, it's clear this election system is just broken.
		It needs rehab.
		It needs restoration.
		I mean, it needs just, it has to be talked about.
		And I don't want to have a situation where Trump has to lose Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Arizona, and Nevada to have that conversation.
		Because then it's too late.
		Because then the Democrats will get total power.
		And I mean, whatever realizations we have at that point to start discussing things that need to be done, it's over.
		It's too late.
unidentified		It's done.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So it's like this whole game, exactly the same reason why I brought up the Republicans saying, breaking news, the Biden laptop is real.
		What is this?
		Is this October 2020?
		I'm sorry.
		What the hell are you doing?
		What are you doing?
		The Biden laptop is real.
		You're four years late.
		You can't even run an election in Pennsylvania.
		The most important state, perhaps, in this election.
		You can't even run an election.
		And you're talking about the Biden laptop?
		Biden's not even running!
		Alright, I'm going to stop that rant and look at some of this other news.
		This is very important.
		Now, you have RFK Jr.
		who's called out how the DOD, the Biden administration for the first time ever, has given the military the right to use lethal force So are they anticipating something?
		Well, yes, they are.
		They're anticipating what will happen if Trump doesn't win the election.
		Or if Trump does win the election, the leftists are going to riot as well.
		They won't use the military on them, though.
		So there's all kinds of different potentials here.
		But listen to what this insurance agent is warning of.
		Something that just got changed that kind of follows up the DOD initiative.
		This is crazy in clip seven.
unidentified		Y'all need to check your insurance policies.
		Listen to this.
		This is something that made me go, hmm.
		As you may know, I have had my insurance license in the state of California for over a decade.
		And when I was reviewing policies for 2024, I noticed this new exclusion.
		Look here, this is under exclusions and expenses not covered on a 2024 Cigna health policy.
		Treatment of an injury or a sickness Which is due to war, declared or undeclared, riot, or insurrection.
		This is not typical.
		This is an insurance policy from United last year for 2023.
		And the language typically reads like this.
		What happens with my coverage under extraordinary circumstances?
		And it says in cases of disaster, epidemic, war, riot, insurrection, that they will do their best to provide the services you need.
		But now take a look at United's 2024 health insurance policy, another exclusion, T, war.
		We do not cover an illness, treatment, or medical condition due to war, declared or undeclared.
		Cigna and United aren't the only ones that have changed their language, excluding war from their policies.
		Anthem has also done this.
		And it just makes you wonder, why in the world would that be the case?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So we're basically heading into a train wreck here where the Democrats are going to deny the election results and Trump supporters are going if they lose and Trump supporters aren't going to believe the election results if they lose.
		I mean, that's just where we're headed, folks.
		And you basically, even if the Democrats wanted to accept the results of the vote, they would still say Trump is illegitimate.
		And that's their plan.
		So you've heard that from Jamie Raskin.
		Now here's Dan Goldman saying that Trump is going to cheat to win the election in clip 20.
daniel goldman ▲ ● ▼		I suspect Donald Trump's little secret plan with Mike Johnson is a backup plan for when he loses, and he tries to go to the House of Representatives to throw out the Electoral College, the certification from the states, and have the House of Representatives under the leadership and the control and the gavel for Mike Johnson and try to overturn this election.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So the Democrats are telling their people Trump's going to overturn it.
		You know, Trump's poll numbers are up, rallying.
		I mean, everything points to a Trump victory.
		So no one's going to believe it if he loses.
		We are in a collision course.
		And then the DOD says, yep, the military can use lethal force.
		Insurance companies are including it now in their plans.
		I mean, this is...
unidentified		Wow.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, one more thing and we'll go back to the phone lines.
		What is the big issue?
		And I told you this yesterday, and I can't believe they actually decided to follow through with it, but they are.
		Remember that Democrat political ad we played yesterday?
		The Democrats closing issues are abortion and pornography.
		That's their closing issues.
		Now, their closing argument is Trump is a Nazi.
		Their closing issues are abortion and pornography.
		You can't make this up.
		Here's Tim Walls saying that on a show on ESPN in Clip 19.
unidentified		Coach, thank you for the time.
		I think you might have swayed down the middle Chris here.
		I think he's voting.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm pro-porn.
unidentified		Excellent work by you guys.
		Hey, you do what you do.
		You beat you.
		You beat you is my thought.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You beat you.
		I'm pro-porn, you beat you.
		Tim Walls, closing arguments ahead of the election.
		They're running on abortion and porn.
		I mean, good lord.
		These are disgusting people.
unidentified		I mean, just disgusting.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		If you like either one of those things, you should probably just shut up about it.
		Let's go to Mitch in Georgia.
		Early voting shenanigans.
		Mitch, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Mr.
		Owen.
		Long time listener.
		First time caller.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Thank you.
unidentified		The thing I don't like about the elections we've had, I didn't check this time.
		We went Saturday.
		The past few Dominions, so I didn't even pay attention this time.
		I just assumed it.
		But I took a picture of the paper that was cast.
		I turned it to the machine.
		And it actually had everything I voted for.
		But they got a QR code.
		And it would not let me take a picture of my ballot until I covered up that QR code.
		And the only way I bypassed it was I hit record and I videotaped it.
		But I tried to take a picture.
		It wouldn't let me take a picture with the QR code on.
		But I put my finger over it and I take a picture.
		But my big issue with the QR code is we don't know what that QR code is telling the machine to print out.
		But this time it told me who I voted for and I was like, yeah, that's right.
		I think previous times it hasn't actually listed who I voted for.
		It just had the QR code.
		So I don't know if I had an issue with that.
		But there's no telling what the QR code is saying compared to what they printed out.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Wow, that's crazy.
		And it wouldn't let you take a picture.
		I've never heard of that.
		I guess that would be some sort of a weird thing they could do with a QR code to shut your camera thing down.
		But yeah, oh, QR code to show you who you vote, so you can't even look at it?
		These things are ridiculous.
		All right, Mitch, thank you for the call.
		Let's go to Jen in Georgia.
		Jen, you're on the air.
		Go ahead.
unidentified		Hey, Owen.
		So my sister, and I say this with love, but she has for many, many years had her head in the sand.
		She never got involved with politics.
		She's never registered to vote.
		I've been catching her up to speed with everything that she's missed out on, and she's mind-blown by everything.
		But I say all that to say that the other day she ended up receiving a letter in the mail, and your call screener was asking me if I knew who the letter was from.
		And I actually took pictures of it before she decided to take it with her.
		And so I'm looking back at those.
		But it's basically a letter that's congratulating her.
		It says, Dear Jessica, that's her name.
		It says, Thank you for registering to vote this year.
		And I showed her.
		She's like, I've never registered.
		That's very strange.
		And apparently it says it's presented by Some president, some CEO named Tom Lopock, if I'm pronouncing that right, by an organization called the Voter Participation Center, and they're located in Atlanta.
		And on the back of the letter, it's showing her, like, what days and times that you get to go vote, early voting in person, by mail.
		Like, it's showing her all this information she needs in order to like vote because apparently she was registered according to them and she's never registered before.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		She never registered but she's been told she registered.
unidentified		Yes and they attached this thing on it called a great citizen award certificate and basically she signed her name on it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well it could be spam.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Is she planning on voting?
unidentified		No.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, oh boy.
		So, who knows?
		Yeah, just another mystery element in our election process.
		All right, that does it.
		We'll take a 21-hour break.
		We'll do it all again tomorrow, ladies and gentlemen.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		So, I'm just asking you to keep me in the fight.
		And we got great t-shirts and incredible blow-you-away supplements and everything, and our great sponsor, DallasJonesStore.com.
		There's a VIP section on there that I noticed was getting really a lot of traction, and I, because I hadn't really, you know, because other folks own this, other folks that are great run this, the folks at Bigly, great Patriot backers, total Patriots, J-Sexers, you name it.
		I didn't realize how good the VIP thing was.
		So, when I saw this the other day, I said, I better talk about this.
		So, if you're a member of the Alex Jones VIP Club at alexjonesstore.com forward slash VIP, or there's just a big link at the top of the page, this is a critical time in our nation.
		We don't know what the future holds for the operation.
		The following information I'm about to relay to you is imperative so we can stay in touch.
		You can get great products and keep me on the air one way or the other along with the crew.
		Monthly member credits.
		Every month as a VIP member, you get $40 of free store credit.
		Did you hear what I just said?
		That's right.
		It's like money in your pocket with the best products on the planet.
		So you pay 30 bucks to be a VIP and then you get 40 bucks free.
		That's $10 you make.
		All the Alex Jones products at the best prices, we're talking about 10 to even 40% off the already existing sales, so sometimes it becomes lost leaders, in the store 24-7, 365 days a year.
		This is an unbeatable pricing you'll never find anywhere else.
		Automatic double entries in any of the giveaways, like the awesome turbo diesel super truck, $138,000 value, plus $1,000 cash.
		The winner of the sweepstakes will be announced on the 30th this month.
		You want to win?
		I know you do, because the VIP will get double entries in every single giveaway.
		No effort, just double your chances just like that.
		Exclusive VIP-only giveaways.
		This is where it gets big, folks.
		VIP members get entered into their own exclusive giveaways every month.
		Nobody else is allowed in these.
		Early access to products, promos, and giveaways.
		VIP members get first access to new products, promotions, and giveaways before anyone else.
		You're in the know.
		Oh, and did I mention orders over $99?
		Free shipping.
		We're not letting shipping costs slow you down.
		It just goes on from there.
		So, thealexjonesstore.com forward slash VIP. Or just at the top of thealexjonesstore.com, you see the VIP button.
		We're fighting the new world order.
		I don't have billionaire backers.
		I am not controlled by anybody, but my own soul, my own brain.
		I'm trying to do the best job I can.
		Theallowshowstore.com.
		It's up to you whether you want to back The number one broadcaster that the enemy hates the most.
		I mean, they literally hate my guts because they know I'm for real and I can't be bought and I can't be intimidated.
		And I'm wild and I scare them.
		And I just don't know why I'm this lovable, friendly person.
		But Satanists and pedophiles do not like me.
		And that's good because I don't like them either.
		And look, we've already done irrevocable harm to them.
		We've already...
		Just devastated them.
		I mean, world government, the dual orders, everywhere is being talked about.
		The whole world's turning against them.
		They're super dangerous.
		They're throwing the kitchen sink at us to try to keep control.
		And I just don't think at 50 years old, after 30 years, when I understand things better than I've ever understood, that I should let these criminals, these globalists, run me to ground.
		So, again, I don't give up.
		Vince Lombardi, winners never quit and quitters never win.
		I mean, I have moral fortitude and will and commitment.
		I just instinctively can't stand these people.
		I know they're super dangerous villains.
		I know they want to break all of our wills and make us super poor to dictate total control over the social credit score, and that it's a super high-tech system of slavery.
		And you look at the globalists, they're the most slithering, disgusting snakes and scum.
		And are we going to sell out our species like this?
		I mean, it's just...
		This is a joke.
	This is ridiculous.
	We're changing the world.

▲