Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Tuesday, July 30th, 2024. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room at your election headquarters with 98 days until the presidential election. | ||
| The fastest three hours on the internet start now brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now, I spent most of this morning... | ||
| Following the Senate hearing into the Trump assassination attempt, and I would say that it was much better than the House hearings, and you now have, with Kim Cheadle out, the replacement director of Secret Service, Ron Rowe, who may or may not have had more access to information in regards to the events on the ground that day. | ||
| But I think he was more forthcoming with some answers, as was the deputy director of the FBI. Abate is his name. | ||
| So we'll get into some of the highlights. | ||
| And there was some interesting information that was revealed. | ||
| Some things being confirmed. | ||
| Some things they couldn't confirm. | ||
| Other things they rejected. | ||
| But definitely more... | ||
| I would say productive than the two House hearings previously combined, even. | ||
| Where Ray answered maybe 5% of the questions and Kim Cheadle answered 0%. | ||
| Today, they actually made an attempt to answer some questions. | ||
| Now, there are still some big mysteries that remain. | ||
| Obviously, but we do have a better idea of how the events are laid out in a timeline from that day thanks to this hearing. | ||
| So we're going to get into some of those important details as well as some other developments in regards to the now cover-up of the attempted assassination of Donald Trump. | ||
| And that's the phase we're in now. | ||
| It is the cover-up phase. | ||
| Now, We're going to be having an expert on the Venezuela situation on the show Friday. | ||
| She also happens to be an expert on the Middle East as well. | ||
| And so we'll be getting into the latest with Israel and Venezuela. | ||
| There is some big news out of Israel. | ||
| They're just rampaging essentially at this point. | ||
| Now bombing Lebanon. So the Middle East continues to go deeper into war. | ||
| Congratulations to the Democrats. | ||
| Your successful Biden presidency has resulted in yet more foreign conflict. | ||
| So congratulations. None of this was going on when Trump was president. | ||
| That's just a fact. But now we have more war. | ||
| And then what's going on in Venezuela. | ||
| And so I'm real hesitant to even cover any of the developments in Venezuela because Do we really know what's going on? | ||
| Do you really know what's going on? | ||
| I think we should leave this one to the people in Venezuela to sort out. | ||
| And let's not pretend like there isn't some sort of Western involvement. | ||
| Down in Venezuela. And let's not act like the CIA or the USA hasn't already selected the person that they want to run the country, Juan Guaido. | ||
| And they've been pushing for him to get into office. | ||
| So maybe the election was stolen. | ||
| Maybe it wasn't. I don't know. | ||
| There's essentially a civil war breaking out now. | ||
| It's total chaos to get Maduro out. | ||
| Some of the military on his side. | ||
| Some of the military now saying they're going to come out against him and be with the people. | ||
| But it's total chaos in the aftermath. | ||
| But my frustration is we get this enhanced coverage or speculation on this Venezuela situation, but we don't even address the issues we have in our own country with stolen elections. | ||
| So, the Senate hearing today... | ||
| The Trump assassination attempt was a lot more productive than the two House hearings. | ||
| I would even say combined, Ron Rowe was willing and or able to at least attempt to answer more questions than Kim Cheadle, who didn't really answer a single question. | ||
| And then the FBI deputy director seemed... | ||
| As well to have more of a desire to answer questions than FBI Director Christopher Wray and even in a couple instances pushed back against some of the answers that Christopher Wray gave. | ||
| And so it really makes you wonder and I guess if you're going to give them any favorability you would say well Maybe the heads of the FBI or the heads of the Secret Service just don't know what's going on. | ||
| They're just in over their head. There's too much information. | ||
| they just really don't know, whereas the two that testified today actually can get more | ||
| information without needing to do as much oversight of the entire bureaucracy. | ||
| Or you could say that the heads of the FBI and the Secret Service were just not willing | ||
| or able, maybe willing is the right way to put it in this regard, not willing to answer | ||
| any of the questions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| So we'll get into some of that. | ||
| And I would actually ask the crew to pull up my thread on X where I was documenting this in real time so we can go over some of the bigger developments. | ||
| In regards to the information that was revealed. | ||
| Secret Service deletes email from Counter Sniper saying agencies should expect another assassination attempt before November due to poor leadership. | ||
| So what other emails are they deleting? | ||
| A counter sniper sent an email Monday night to the entire uniformed division saying he | ||
| will not stop speaking out until high-level supervisors are either fired or removed from | ||
| their current positions. | ||
| By the way, nobody's been fired. | ||
| Nobody's been fired. | ||
| Cheadle resigned. Nobody's been fired. | ||
| The counter-sniper said the agency should expect another assassination attempt before November and complained that he is no longer proud to be a Secret Service counter-sniper after leadership failed to protect Trump on July 13th. | ||
| Quote, If not now, when? | ||
| The next assassination in 30 days? | ||
| Sadly, we have fallen short for years. | ||
| We just look good doing it. | ||
| I've conveyed these thoughts to not only supervisors, to include current captain of CS, but those responding for training, only to be brushed off with those less experienced, somehow new, more than me. | ||
| Now this is all over the place. | ||
| And You know, there's lots of former Secret Service members that go on television, that do interviews. | ||
| There's one that's got a top podcast right now, Dan Bongino. | ||
| And they've all been talking about this. | ||
| For years, they've been talking about the lack of Secret Service training and preparedness. | ||
| And so I guess it just finally showed its true nature on July 13th. | ||
| It seems to be more sinister than that, doesn't it? | ||
| Especially when you look at some of the details that they still can't answer in today's hearing. | ||
| Now, there was an interesting development because I didn't like the way the FBI deputy director basically threw red meat to the Democrats today, Director Abate. | ||
| FBI now claims Trump would be assassin, allegedly ran a, quote, anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic social media account. | ||
| Now, these posts that they're claiming were made in 2019. | ||
| So the FBI deputy director comes out in a statement during his testimony and says, we've located potential communications from the shooter on social media, didn't specify what Social media that would indicate anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic content or posts. | ||
| And he said that there were potentially hundreds. | ||
| Now, this was like red meat for the Democrats, and they jumped right on it, basically saying, see, this is proof it was a right-winger. | ||
| Which, of course, it doesn't make any sense. | ||
| It doesn't add up. But that's what they're doing. | ||
| And so when you open up the hearing and you say, we still don't know the motive... | ||
| You still don't know the motive. | ||
| Oh yeah, we don't know the motive. | ||
| We don't know the motive of the shooter. | ||
| Let's see. He was just aiming a gun at Donald Trump at a Trump rally where he was casing the grounds a week before the rally and he was training to shoot and then he pointed a gun and fired and tried to kill Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But we don't know the motive. | |
| We just do not know the motive. | ||
| Have no clue what the motive is. | ||
| Oh, I don't know. | ||
| Could the motive have been to kill Donald Trump? | ||
| Could that have been the motive? | ||
| Maybe. Maybe that was the motive. | ||
| I don't know. Maybe I'm reaching here. | ||
| Maybe I'm crazy. Seems like the motive was to kill Trump. | ||
| Never had FBI training, so I don't want to be out of my jurisdiction here. | ||
| I don't want to go out of my league here, but seems like we know the motive quite well. | ||
| And so he comes out and he says, we just don't know the motive. | ||
| And then he says he had an anti-immigrant, anti-Semitic posts. | ||
| And these were supposedly in 2019. | ||
| So that's like red meat for the Democrats. | ||
| By the way, it's probably worth mentioning... | ||
| And you can tell a lot when you're listening, because I was listening to C-SPAN radio during this. | ||
| I wasn't watching it. | ||
| I was listening on C-SPAN radio, and I was watching some other stuff. | ||
| And it's funny. You can really... | ||
| When you listen to things, it hits differently than when you watch things. | ||
| Quite frankly, that's why I prefer the... | ||
| Old school radio broadcast technique, or you could even say podcast now. | ||
| Because listening, you obtain information, you retain information in a better way. | ||
| There's a better cognition. | ||
| And the way your body obtains it and retains it allows you a lot better perspective into it. | ||
| Because you're not distracted with the sights. | ||
| It's all... It's all audio and you can analyze things at a different level. | ||
| It was really amazing the contrast where Senator Dick Durbin and Maisie Hirono, compared to the rest of the senators involved in that hearing, are pretty much morons. | ||
| I mean, you can tell when you listen to everybody speak that Senator Dick Durbin and Maisie Hirono probably barely have an IQ of 100. | ||
| I mean, these are just dumb people. | ||
| And it's painful that they're in charge of government. | ||
| It's painful that they're sitting in some of the most powerful positions in our country. | ||
| I mean, you would see these people in a classroom and you'd be like, gee, you're not going to learn much from this teacher, huh? | ||
| Just low IQ people. | ||
| So it's kind of just a side note, except for the fact that of all the senators... | ||
| That were involved in the hearing today. | ||
| There were only two that made it all about gun control. | ||
| Do you know what two they were? | ||
| Senator Dick Durbin and Mazie Hirono. | ||
| Used their entire time to make it about gun control. | ||
| And then Mazie Hirono used some of her time to insinuate that it was a right wing attack because of the red meat. | ||
| That Deputy Director Abate said, oh, anti-Semitic, anti-immigrant, which of course is what the Democrats say about right-wingers all day long, even though it's obviously the left-wing that's out burning American flags, burning Israel flags, burning Netanyahu effigies, chanting death to Israel. | ||
| So, okay, but fine. | ||
| Well, luckily, this got corrected later when another senator brought up the report from Gab's Andrew Torbaugh So the supposed posts made by the would-be shooter that he says was anti-Semitic and anti-immigrant would have been made when he was 14 or 15 years old in 2019 and 2020. | ||
| So he would have been 14 or 15 at the time. | ||
| The posts made on Gab were as recent as 2021, where he was posting left-wing content. | ||
| pro-lockdown, pro-immigration, and left-wing content, including Joe Biden support. | ||
| So what's the truth here? | ||
| Well, the funny thing is, when the follow-up questions to the deputy director | ||
| about the Gab post came up, the deputy director then had to admit, | ||
| well, actually, we have no evidence, really. | ||
| We have no proof that any of these posts were made by the shooter. | ||
| Oh, so you don't even know they were made by the shooter, but then you open up your statement with them anyway | ||
| as if you wanted to throw that red meat for the Democrats. | ||
| Incredible. | ||
| So he starts out by saying he was anti-immigrant and anti-Semitic. | ||
| Doesn't mention anything about the gab posts. | ||
| And then a senator brings up the gab posts. | ||
| And then the deputy director says, well, actually, the posts I mentioned, we have no proof that those were actually the shooter. | ||
| We can't confirm that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh! Oh! | |
| Then why'd you say it? | ||
| Why'd you say it? If you don't even know it's him, why'd you say it? | ||
| Well, we want to be transparent at this point in the investigation, but there are a lot of other things you didn't want to be transparent about that are probably more important. | ||
| But you don't know the motive. | ||
| The motive is a mystery. | ||
| We don't know the motive. | ||
| I'm the deputy director of the FBI, and I have no idea what the guy on the roof was doing. | ||
| We have no idea what he was shooting at. | ||
| We don't know the motive. We don't know the goal. | ||
| We're just over here at the FBI. Clueless, deaf, dumb, blind. | ||
| What was the motive? | ||
| Now, Andrew Torba has responded to this, saying, no, the account we found associated with the shooter was definitely left-wing. | ||
| Now, we reached out to Andrew for comments. | ||
| He's made a couple public comments on his X account, probably on his Gab account as well. | ||
| He's not doing any interviews right now. | ||
| As recommended by his legal advice, the advice he's getting from his attorneys, when he can make public comments or do an interview, he said he will join us, but that's where it's at right now. | ||
| Now, some other interesting developments, if you guys would pull up my ex-feed here. | ||
| If you don't have it, we'll go to the Hawley Exchange. | ||
| Let's do that. Let's go to the Howley exchange and then you guys can just bring up my entire X thread or even print it for me. | ||
| This was probably the best exchange and it was Howley and then Cruz back to back. | ||
| Alright, we've got it now. We'll save that for later. | ||
| So they basically admit now that the shooter was known to law enforcement more than an | ||
| hour before the first shot was fired. | ||
| More than an hour. | ||
| Now the interesting developments now are that the photo that we have of Crooks from the | ||
| second story of the building where there was supposed to be a counter sniper team and Secret | ||
| Service was supposed to be there. | ||
| The Secret Service director today claimed that photo came from local law enforcement. | ||
| From local law enforcement. | ||
| Not Secret Service. | ||
| Secret Service again doubled down on blaming the local police claiming they were supposed | ||
| to be the ones manning that rooftop. | ||
| Still no answers as to why nobody was there when the shooter was there. | ||
| But somebody was there. | ||
| Dozens of officers were in that building. | ||
| That was the law enforcement headquarters. | ||
| That was the Secret Service headquarters. | ||
| And somebody was in the second story window at some point in that day because they took photos of crooks. | ||
| From the second story window. | ||
| So where were they when he was climbing the roof? | ||
| Where were they when he was lining up his shot? | ||
| They don't know. | ||
| They don't know where they were and they don't know why they weren't there. | ||
| That's incredible, isn't it? | ||
| That is truly stunning, isn't it? | ||
| Now, Secret Service Director Rowe contradicted himself during his testimony today. | ||
| At one point, he admitted that Secret Service had an ear on all comms in the headquarters. | ||
| So, Secret Service director says, well, we did not archive or record any of our communications that day. | ||
| Local law enforcement did, that's protocol. | ||
| Why Secret Service didn't, he doesn't know, wasn't protocol, whatever. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They didn't have it. Okay. | |
| Suspicious, not suspicious. | ||
| You decide for yourself. | ||
| Point is, they don't have it. | ||
| But he admitted that there was a Secret Service team monitoring all communications, including local law enforcement. | ||
| Including local law enforcement. | ||
| Well, why does this contradict his own testimony? | ||
| Because later in the hearing... | ||
| When he was asked about, well, how did Secret Service not know that there was a guy scaling the roof? | ||
| How did Secret Service not know that there was a gunman on the roof, even though it went over the local comms at least five minutes before the first shot was fired, and potentially up to ten minutes before the first shot was fired? | ||
| It's unclear when first communications were made. | ||
| Law enforcement was made aware of a guy climbing onto the roof. | ||
| They also have a video, they have multiple videos in their possession of a guy climbing onto the roof, including a cop dash cam video. | ||
| And it sounds like, but he wouldn't commit to this, but it sounds like they're leaning towards, he had a gun disassembled in a bag, he carried it onto the roof and assembled it. | ||
| So we're talking probably at least 10 minutes here, it looks like. | ||
| Five minimum, and this has been the timeline all along, but he just confirmed it. | ||
| Of them knowing there was a guy on the roof and knowing that there was a shooter on the roof. | ||
| But then he says, so even though this was going out over communications, even though this was going out over local law enforcement communications, you see him running around on the ground. | ||
| They saw the guy in multiple videos. | ||
| He then says, Secret Service had not been informed and received no communications about | ||
| a shooter on the roof. | ||
| But you already said Secret Service was monitoring all communications, all radios, including | ||
| local law enforcement. | ||
| So which one is it? | ||
| Was Secret Service monitoring all radio communications that day? | ||
| Meaning they would have heard the local law enforcement radio communications about a guy | ||
| on the roof with a gun at least five minutes before the first shot was fired. | ||
| Or were they not monitoring any communications and nobody communicated with them that there was a shooter on the roof? | ||
| Which one is it? | ||
| Which one is it? He did confirm that the kill shot came from the counter sniper team to the left of Donald Trump, or if you're facing the stage, the team to the right. | ||
| He said that the team, if you're facing the stage to the left, which is the famous video where they flinch for a second, the team that's on most of the videos is the team to the left, the team to Trump's right, but to the left of the stage if you're facing it. | ||
| They did not have a line of sight on the shooter. | ||
| They were blocked by the tree. | ||
| The kill shot came from the guys on the right. | ||
| Now, even though original reports were that that team fired one shot and then local law enforcement fired one shot that missed, the only thing they're saying is that the counter sniper secret service team fired one shot and that was the kill shot and that was it. | ||
| And so that's all the details we have about that. | ||
| But they say he got off eight shots, and it took 15 seconds, was the timeline he said, which does add up. | ||
| We did the countdown on the show with the audio. | ||
| He said 15 seconds from the first shot from the roof to the kill shot from Secret Service to neutralize the shooter. | ||
| 15 seconds, which does line up with the timeline of the audio. | ||
| So we did get a confirmation of that. | ||
| Now, the big questions still remain unanswered. | ||
| How is it that this individual is casing the building, using a rangefinder, going back and forth to a bag with a bike, then picking up a bag, scaling a roof, and pulling off a shot without anybody interrupting him? | ||
| Nobody interrupting him. | ||
| Nobody questioning him. | ||
| No answers. Maybe the more obvious question and answer that still remains unanswered. | ||
| Why was Trump allowed to take the stage? | ||
| And after he took the stage, why was he allowed to stay on the stage? | ||
| Again, these questions remain unanswered. | ||
| It seems impossible to believe that That that is a mistake. | ||
| It seems impossible to believe that that is a failure to communicate, that that is somehow incompetence. | ||
| When you have all that time, when you have awareness of a shooter on the roof, when you have knowledge of a suspicious individual walking around, casing the building with a range fire, with a bag, Trump should not have been allowed to take the stage and Trump should have been obviously off the stage before the first shot was fired and they have no answers. | ||
| They have no answers. | ||
| Now, Ron Johnson has requested a interview with 13 Secret Service members that were directly involved In the security detail that day, and he's trying to get access to them, it seems like Secret Service is stonewalling that access. | ||
| So there might be some more intel that could come out from individuals, but certainly there's going to be a power play made by the head of the Secret Service for them not to talk or divulge any failures that may have led to the attempted assassination, whether intentional or not. | ||
| So even though we did get more information, he did say the specific gun that was used. | ||
| Again, he did say where the shot was taken, which FBI director had no idea. | ||
| Ray didn't even know. Even though he claimed to have interviewed him, he said he didn't know where the shot was fired from. | ||
| So really, today was an embarrassment for Christopher Wray and for Kim Cheadle, who refused to answer any questions. | ||
| And today there were actually questions asked and answered. | ||
| Now one question that is kind of off subject but did get asked. | ||
| Biden Department of Justice gives Peter Stroke and Lisa Page $2 million over text exposing anti-Trump agenda. | ||
| They got paid off. | ||
| They got paid off by the DOJ. And saying that they were treated wrongfully by the U.S. government. | ||
| Are you kidding me? The people that work for the FBI that said the FBI would do everything to keep Trump out of office? | ||
| The people that were part of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, a crime against this country, a crime against the president, they're getting a settlement? | ||
| Seven-figure settlement from the DOJ? They're the victims in all of this? | ||
| Deputy Director Abate of the FBI shrugged his shoulders and had no comment on that. | ||
| Now there's some more developments in regards to this. | ||
| By the way, when questions were brought up about why was the Trump team lacking detail, they came to the conclusion that it was a lack of resources and a lack of personnel. | ||
| Well, okay, well, why does Jill Biden get so much security when Trump is obviously a higher security threat than Jill Biden? | ||
| Why is Jill Biden a priority? | ||
| And then they say, well, Secret Service needs more resources. | ||
| Well, maybe they do, maybe they don't. | ||
| They just got more resources. | ||
| And maybe we could afford more resources if we didn't just give $200 billion to Ukraine. | ||
| You know, maybe that would have been better fit for our own national security. | ||
| But that's not how this Congress works, is it? | ||
| All right, for most of the hearing, the temperature in the room was not at a boiling point. | ||
| That is until it was Josh Howley's time. | ||
| And he certainly raised the temperature of the hearing. | ||
| And here was his question and answer session. | ||
| American is dead, that other Americans were critically wounded. | ||
| Isn't that enough mission failure for you to say that the person who decided that that building should not be in the security perimeter probably ought to be stepped down? | ||
| Senator, I think you're using the word decided, and I think we need to allow the investigation play out to include... | ||
| Okay, so who did make the decision then? | ||
| If it wasn't the lead site agent who made the decision not to put that in the security perimeter? | ||
| Senator, you're zeroing in on one particular agent. | ||
| I want to find out exactly what was the entire decision process. | ||
| So I think I want to be neutral and make sure that we get to the bottom of it and interview everybody in order to determine if there was more than one person who perhaps exercised bad judgment. | ||
| Well, sure. My question is, why don't you relieve everybody of duty who made bad judgment? | ||
| So yeah, you're right. | ||
| I am zeroing in on somebody. | ||
| I'm trying to find somebody who's accountable here. | ||
| So you're telling me that the person who made the decision not to include this in the perimeter has not been relieved of duty. | ||
| What about the person who's in charge of the interoperability of radio frequencies between local law enforcement and Secret Service? | ||
| Has that person been relieved of duty? | ||
| No, Senator, because interoperability is a challenge, is a greater challenge than just one person. | ||
| On that day, we had a counterpart system. | ||
| It failed spectacularly. | ||
| As the person who decided, who made the decision to send Donald Trump onto stage knowing that you had a security situation, has that person been relieved of duty? | ||
| No, sir, they haven't. As the person who decided not to pull the former president off of stage when you knew that, in your words, the locals were working a serious security situation, has that person been relieved of duty? | ||
| No, sir. Again, I refer you back to my original answer that we are investigating this through a mission assurance and as opposed to zeroing in on one or two individuals. | ||
| What more do you need to investigate to know that there were critical enough failures that some individuals ought to be held accountable? | ||
| I mean, what more do you need to know? | ||
| What I need to know is exactly what happened, and I need my investigators to do their job, and I cannot... | ||
| A lot of people didn't do their jobs. I cannot put my thumb on the scale. | ||
| Otherwise... What do you mean put your thumb on the scale? | ||
| The objective... You're asking me, Senator, to completely make a rush to judgment about somebody failing. | ||
| I acknowledge this was a failure of... | ||
| Is it not prima facie that somebody has failed? | ||
| A former president was shot! | ||
| Sir, this could have been our Texas School Book Depository. | ||
| I have lost sleep over that for the last 17 days, just like you have. | ||
| And I will tell you, Senator, I will tell you, Senator, that I will not rush to judgment, that people will be held accountable, and I will do so with integrity. | ||
| And not rush to judgment and put people unfairly persecuted. | ||
| Unfairly, sir. | ||
| We have to be able to have a proper investigation into this, Senator. | ||
| You said earlier that you've got to make sure that your protocols are followed, and unless there's a protocol violation, people wouldn't be disciplined. | ||
| I would just say to you, I don't really care that much about your protocols. | ||
| I think if your protocols don't provide for the fact that when a former president is shot, When an American is killed, when other rally-goers, innocent people who just showed up on the day when they are shot at and critically wounded, if that isn't a protocol violation, prima facie, you should revise your protocols. | ||
| Senator, I think this is where you and I agree. | ||
| This was a failure, and we will get to the bottom of it. | ||
| Well, I hope you're going to do something about it. | ||
| Let me ask you something else. | ||
| The RealClearPolitics reports this morning that you were directly involved in denying additional security resources and personnel, including counter snipers, not just to this event, but over the last two years that President Trump's team repeatedly asked for these additional resources, and you personally were involved in denying them. | ||
| Is that true? Senator, as I stated earlier, that is not true. | ||
| So you never denied any resources to former President Trump's team? | ||
| No, not me. No, sir. | ||
| And you weren't involved in any of that? | ||
| You were never involved in the decision making? | ||
| No, sir, I was not. | ||
| Let me ask you just one or two other things here quickly. | ||
| Well, whistleblowers tell me that, in fact, law enforcement were stationed to be on that roof and that law enforcement abandoned their post because it was too hot. | ||
| Is that accurate? Senator, I have heard that as well. | ||
| Again, They posted up inside. | ||
| And I think moving forward, as I said earlier, we're going to ensure that state and local counter snipers are on the roof. | ||
| This is the most important thing here. | ||
| So they were supposed to be on the roof. | ||
| They abandoned the roof because it was too hot. | ||
| It wasn't too hot for the other counter sniper teams. | ||
| Wasn't too hot for the individuals waiting hours for Donald Trump. | ||
| Wasn't too hot for the shooter to get down in a prone position on his bare knees. | ||
| But it was too hot for the counter sniper team. | ||
| Okay. Well, then they go inside. | ||
| At some point in the day, they go inside. | ||
| And they even take a picture of Crooks from the window. | ||
| Now, where are they when he's climbing onto the roof? | ||
| Where are they when he's shooting at Trump? | ||
| You know they're in the building. | ||
| Why aren't they on the second story window? | ||
| And how has it been two weeks, two weeks, and you don't have an answer? | ||
| How do you not know that after two weeks? | ||
| How have you not sat down and talked to every single law enforcement agent, secret service agent, to get an answer? | ||
|
unidentified
|
How is that? How is that? | |
| And why are whistleblowers willing to talk to Howley about this, but they're not talking to the Secret Service about this? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Interesting. Interesting. | |
| Let's go back to Howley. | ||
| Do you know if someone was supposed to be on the roof? | ||
| Do you know if someone was in fact? | ||
| That's what the whistleblower tells me. | ||
| That may or may not be accurate. Do you know that to be the fact? | ||
| Was somebody posted to the roof, local law enforcement or whomever? | ||
| I do not know that to be a fact. | ||
| Well, can I ask you why you don't know that? | ||
| Again, Senator, we are looking at this and they should have been on that roof and the fact that they were in the building is something that I'm still trying to understand. | ||
| I just want to express my frustration, Director, that 17 days or whatever it's been that whistleblowers are telling us more than you are and you don't know, you haven't ascertained if there was supposed to be law enforcement on the roof. | ||
| That seems like a pretty basic fact. | ||
| I'm also told That local law enforcement suppliers offered the Secret Service drones, and you declined them. | ||
| Is that true? So, Senator, one, I've been very transparent and forthcoming. | ||
| Your agency has not been transparent and forthcoming, so please, let's not go there. | ||
| I have been forthcoming, sir. | ||
| That remains to be seen. | ||
| You've been on the job a few days. | ||
| So far, you've fired nobody. | ||
| Now, the drones. | ||
| Thank you, sir. Were you offered drones? | ||
| So there was an offer to fly a drone on that day. | ||
| And why did you deny it? Again, I think the ability of local law enforcement to provide an asset, we probably should have taken them up on it if it was offered. | ||
| Sure you should have. So this is now the next big development here. | ||
| Local law enforcement offered to have air surveillance security with a drone that day. | ||
| Secret Service denied. | ||
| Now, why did they deny it? | ||
| Why wouldn't they take all the help they can get? | ||
| Well, the excuse might be... | ||
| Well, Secret Service was supposed to have their own aerial support and aerial security. | ||
| Oh, well, why didn't they? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, there was a technical difficulty. | |
| That's right, folks. | ||
| There was a technical difficulty, and for some reason, the Secret Service just could not get their air support and could not get their air security and could not fly a drone due to a technical difficulty. | ||
| Somehow... The shooter was able to fly a drone, no problem. | ||
| But Secret Service just couldn't do it with all the technology. | ||
| Couldn't do it. Couldn't do it. | ||
| Had a technical difficulty. | ||
| So what measures did they make to remedy the fact that they had a technical difficulty that led to a lack of air security and air support? | ||
| None. None at all. | ||
| Now, this is, again, almost unbelievable. | ||
| Was there a technical glitch? | ||
| Did they intentionally stand down air support with a drone from local law enforcement? | ||
| Folks, it's well known at big crowds. | ||
| When we would go to rallies like this or big events, you have to take some form of a hotspot. | ||
| Sometimes you can have just a little local hotspot that does the trick. | ||
| Sometimes you need a bigger, more powerful hotspot. | ||
| It's like you got to carry it around in a wagon. | ||
| And so how does Secret Service in the middle of a field not be prepared to have their own internet connection or Wi-Fi connection so that they won't have a technical difficulty with their security? | ||
| Again, is this even possible? | ||
| All right, we're gonna go back to the hearing. | ||
| We're gonna hear from Ted Cruz. We'll also hear from Mike Lee coming up later. | ||
| We got some other developments. First though, this is a message specifically for the men out there. | ||
| And it's well known that prostate issues are one of the number one issues for men. | ||
| And you'd probably rather not get a prostate exam. | ||
| Certainly not the Democrat style in the House chambers if you catch my drift. | ||
| But you should be doing something to think about and to address prostate health. | ||
| This stuff is all over the news. | ||
| In fact, why I thought of this is because every morning I wake up and I put on this news headline broadcast. | ||
| It's just news headlines. And every once in a while there'll be a health headline. | ||
| And today there was a couple about prostate issues with men. | ||
| And this one how Lloyd Austin and King Charles and all these people have prostate issues. | ||
| And it's the number one issue for men. | ||
| And I'm just thinking, well, okay, what are men doing to address this or what can they do to address this? | ||
| Well, there are ways to do it with health, but if you're not getting the proper things you need in your diet, then you probably should be supplementing. | ||
| And so that's why we have a product at Infowarsstore.com, part of the Infowars MD product line, Prostate | ||
| Guard. | ||
| And so if you're a man out there, specifically one, especially one that's getting older, | ||
| prostate support, excuse me, 25% off right now at Infowarsstore.com, a complex mixture | ||
| of vitamins, herbs, extracts, and powders for prostate health. | ||
| So again, men, what are you doing? | ||
| Are you thinking about prostate health? | ||
| Are you thinking about protecting your prostate? | ||
| This is a big concern when it comes to getting older and men's health. | ||
| So I would hope that you're doing something. | ||
| And you can just go look at the long list of ingredients, all things in there known to support men's prostates. | ||
| And so this is a great thing you can do. | ||
| Take your prostate support every morning and just know you're doing something to address that issue and hopefully you won't have to worry about it later in life. | ||
| So this is a message specifically for men. | ||
| When you see the stories, when you see the headlines about people having prostate issues, maybe it's a friend, maybe it's a family member, that's the sign. | ||
| It's time for you to do something to address it. | ||
| So, prostate support. | ||
| You can see this long list of ingredients all known for prostate support. | ||
| It's part of the InfoWarsMD line. | ||
| 25% off right now at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 25% off prostate support Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| So you support your prostate, you support your health, and you support Infowars in the process. | ||
| All right, now let's go to once Howley raised the temperature in the room, it stayed at a higher temperature the rest of the way, including for Ted Cruz's time. | ||
| Thank you, Mr. Chairman. | ||
| Mr. Rowe, thank you for being here. | ||
| I agree with what you said at the outset that the individual Secret Service agents demonstrated remarkable personal courage putting their bodies in between the line of sight of the shooter and the president. | ||
| That being said, the bravery of the line agents is quite different from the decisions of Secret Service leadership. | ||
| Secret Service leadership committed catastrophic security failures. | ||
| Indeed, the worst security failures for the Secret Service since 1981, since the attempted assassination of President Ronald Reagan. | ||
| It is incumbent upon this committee to determine why those security failures happened. | ||
| Just after the shooting, Secret Service put out an official statement from your spokesperson that says there's an untrue assertion that a member of the former president's team requested additional security resources and that those were rebuffed. | ||
| This is absolutely false. | ||
| In fact, we added protective resources and technology and capabilities as part of the increased campaign travel tempo. | ||
| Was this tweet accurate? | ||
| With respect to Butler, Pennsylvania, it is accurate, sir. | ||
| It is accurate that The Trump team had not asked for additional security and had not been rebuffed. | ||
| If you're talking about Butler, Pennsylvania, all assets requested were approved. | ||
| If you're talking about the media reporting of assets requested, there are times when assets were unavailable and not able to be filled, and those gaps were staffed with local law enforcement tactical assets. | ||
| I'm reading from the Washington Post, July 20th, 2024. | ||
| Secret Service said to have denied requests for more security at Trump events. | ||
| The opening paragraph. Top officials of the U.S. Secret Service repeatedly denied requests for additional resources and personnel sought by Donald Trump's security detail in the two years leading up to his attempted assassination. | ||
| According to four people familiar with the requests. | ||
| Is that right? That repeatedly... | ||
| The Trump detail asked for more resources and repeatedly Secret Service leadership turned that down? | ||
| That is not accurate, Senator. | ||
| Assets are requested. | ||
| There's a process that is made. | ||
| How many requests did the Trump team or the Trump detail ask for? | ||
| I can get you that number in a queue. | ||
| You don't know now? | ||
| I can speak to the ones that reported in the Washington Post and we can go through them if you like. | ||
| But you don't know how many requests there were? | ||
| In general, how many requests since 2021 that the former Trump detail has made a request for assets? | ||
| You've had two weeks. You had a spokesperson put something out that is false on its face. | ||
| By the way, did you approve this statement when it went out? | ||
| I don't know if I did or didn't, Senator. | ||
| Has this spokesperson, is he still employed? | ||
| Does he still have a job? He is still employed, Senator. | ||
| So he lied on behalf of the Secret Service. | ||
| He still has a job. Did your predecessor, the former director, did she approve this statement? | ||
| Senator, our comms team, they send out statements. | ||
| They do deconflict them and they put them out. | ||
| Did she approve this statement? | ||
| I don't know if she did or did not. | ||
| And you don't know if you did either? | ||
| I don't recall approving it, Senator. | ||
| Will you commit to provide this committee in writing? | ||
| Every written request for additional resources from the Trump campaign or the Trump detail and every response from Secret Service. | ||
| Senator, I will commit to providing responses and getting you the information that you are seeking. | ||
| May I ask you something? | ||
| And who makes the decision to deny those requests? | ||
| Did you make that decision? Which requests, sir? | ||
| Are you talking about the ones that were in the launch and the post? | ||
| Yes. The process, sir, is that a detail will make a request for either staffing, technical assets, that is handled between the field office and the detail. | ||
| It goes up to a logistics office between... | ||
| Okay, so there's a bureaucracy. | ||
| Is there a decision-maker? | ||
| It's not a bureaucracy, Senator. It's a process. | ||
| Give me the person that's a decision-maker. Is there one? | ||
| Senator, it's a conversation. | ||
| It's not just an absolute yay or nay. | ||
| So let me tell you what I believe. | ||
| I believe that the Secret Service leadership made a political decision to deny these requests. | ||
| And I think the Biden administration has been suffused with partisan politics. | ||
| Did the same person who denied the request for additional security to President Trump also repeatedly deny the request for security to Robert F. Kennedy Jr., whose father was murdered by an assassin and whose uncle was murdered by an assassin? | ||
| Did the same person make that decision? | ||
| Senator, what I will tell you is that Secret Service agents are not political. | ||
| Okay, you're not answering my question. | ||
| I'll get to your answer, Senator, if you allow me to. | ||
| Leadership appointed by the President is political. | ||
| I have a simple question, yes or no. | ||
| Did the same person deny the Trump request that also denied the RFK request? | ||
| That's a yes or no question. | ||
| Senator, that is not a yes or no question. | ||
| One, there is a process for a candidate nominee to receive protection. | ||
| Does the buck stop anywhere? | ||
| That is a bicameral, bipartisan process. | ||
| It's a bicameral, bipartisan process? | ||
| What camera? You are not a Congress. | ||
| You don't have a camera. Mr. | ||
| Kennedy submitted a request that was referred over to the CPAC. Okay, you're refusing to answer the question. | ||
| Let me ask, because the failures on that day were catastrophic. | ||
| By the way, Is it true that on the day of the Butler event that Secret Service transferred agent for President Trump to the First Lady? | ||
| No, sir. That's not true. | ||
| That's been widely reported. | ||
| It's not true. There was one airport agent that actually went on the manpower request for the Trump detail. | ||
| They handled the arrival at the airport for the First Lady. | ||
| What was the relative size of the Trump detail compared to the detail that is assigned to the President of the First Lady? | ||
| Senator, the former president travels with a full shift, just like the president. | ||
| So the exact same size? | ||
| Is that your testimony that President Trump had the same size detail that President Biden has? | ||
| On the day of in Butler, the agents surrounding him, it is the same number of agents surrounding the president today. | ||
| There is a difference between a sitting president who also not only... | ||
| Hold on. You're using president in a way that is not clear. | ||
| Is it your testimony that in Butler, Pennsylvania, Donald Trump had the same number of agents protecting him that Joe Biden has at a comparable event? | ||
| I'm telling you the shift, the close protection shift surrounding it. | ||
| That's what you asked me, Senator, and I'm trying to answer it. | ||
| You are not answering it. | ||
| Is it the same number of agents or not? | ||
| Senator, there is a difference between the sitting president of the United States... | ||
| Then what's the difference? The difference? | ||
| 2X, 3X, 5X, 10X? National command authority to launch a nuclear strike, sir. | ||
| I'm not asking how many more agents... | ||
|
unidentified
|
...that travel with the president that the former president will not get. | |
| Sir, you are refusing to answer straight... | ||
| Sir, stop interrupting me. | ||
| Stop interrupting me. Go ahead, Senator. | ||
| You are refusing to answer clear and direct questions. | ||
| I am asking the relative difference in the number of agents Between those assigned to Donald Trump and those assigned to Joe Biden. | ||
| I'm not asking why you assign more to Joe Biden. | ||
| I'm asking, is the difference, is it 2x? | ||
| Is it 3x? | ||
| Is it 5x? Is it 10x? | ||
| Senator, I will get you that number so you can see it with your own. | ||
| Yeah, we'll see. I hope there's more follow-up from these hearings. | ||
| There needs to be. | ||
| All right, we'll go back to the hearing. | ||
| We're gonna pivot now to the Harris campaign, and I'm compiling in the background here a bunch of just insane Harris videos, and it needs to be policy, and it needs to be public statements that we go after. | ||
| I mean, yeah, her laugh is crazy, and her shenanigans and dance moves are cringe, but it's the policy that will defeat her. | ||
| They had a White Dudes for Harris hearing, and we're about to be joined by Brianna Morello, who I guess was able to sneak into the meeting because they don't know what a woman is, so she was able to get in on the White Dudes for Harris. | ||
| She's going to tell us about it. Here's some of the aftermath. | ||
| And when you listen to this statement from Pete Booty Juice, Booty Judge, you just realize everything they say is disingenuous. | ||
| Everything Pete Booty Juice says in this interview is disingenuous or an outright lie. | ||
| Let's break it down in clip eight. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But for all of that, what's really filling my sails right now And what I think Kamala Harris is expressing so well right now is the positive side of all this, a reminder of what we are for, namely freedom. | |
| Freedom! I'm so glad she has made freedom the theme of her campaign. | ||
| I think in so many ways that's... | ||
| Pause it. Freedom is the theme of Kamala Harris's campaign. | ||
| What is he talking about? | ||
| What freedom is he talking about? | ||
| I guess abortion? That's where he's going to go. | ||
| Freedom? The party of vaccine mandates? | ||
| The party of higher taxes? | ||
| The party of forcing you to pay for non-citizens and wars and illegal border crossers? | ||
| Freedom? The party of censorship? | ||
| The party that wants to take your guns? | ||
| Kamala Harris has made multiple statements saying she wants to take your guns. | ||
| Party of freedom? What an outright misrepresentation or lie. | ||
| The candidate of freedom. | ||
| Unbelievable. These are the games they play. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. And yes, women's freedom is exhibit A after Donald Trump demolished the right to choose. | |
| Okay, pause it right there. Donald Trump demolished the right to choose. | ||
| Tell me, what action did Donald Trump do directly that changed any abortion laws in this country? | ||
| What did Donald Trump do? | ||
| I'd love to hear Pete Booty Juice answer that question. | ||
| Of course, the answer is he didn't do anything. | ||
| The Supreme Court sent the abortion laws to the states, which, by the way, far-left liberal Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in multiple interviews that Roe v. | ||
| Wade should have never happened and that that issue belonged at the state level already. | ||
| So no, Trump did not abolish abortion rights. | ||
| That is just an outright lie. | ||
| The Supreme Court sent the issue to the states. | ||
| It's a states issue. | ||
| It has nothing to do with Trump. | ||
| So just another complete lie from Booty Juice. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Of course, men are also more free in a country where we have a president who stands up for things like access to abortion. | |
| Oh, pause it. Oh my gosh. | ||
| Access to abortion care. | ||
| Just say what it is. | ||
| You want to be able to kill their babies. Men have more freedom. | ||
| Wow. So, oh, congratulations, men. | ||
| You can go around knocking up women and have your children killed. | ||
| Wow. What a campaign statement. | ||
| Are you trying to be the VP, Booty Juice? | ||
| See how that one takes. | ||
| Congratulations, men. | ||
| Hey, men, vote for Democrats because we'll let you kill your kids. | ||
| We'll let you kill your kids. | ||
| Vote for Kamala is freedom for men to kill their kids. | ||
| I mean, unbelievable that this stuff flies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright, finish the clip....are more free when the leader of the free world and the leader of this country supports access to birth control. | |
| And then there's that lie. | ||
| Show me any Republican Party platform policy that wants to stop access to birth control. | ||
| You can't find it. You might be able to find a Republican here or there. | ||
| It's a fringe minority that has suggested maybe getting rid of contraceptives or birth control. | ||
| It's not the Republican Party platform. | ||
| It's not even in Project 2025. | ||
| So it's just another outright lie that they tell you. | ||
| So everything they say is either a misrepresentation or just an outright lie. | ||
| Democrats, that is all they do, is either misrepresent or lie. | ||
| Pete Buttigieg did it how many times in 40 seconds? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So what made you decide to start a podcast? | |
| Obviously, everybody and their mother has a podcast. | ||
| Yours is genuinely special. | ||
| What made you decide, you know what, I'm going to add my name to the hat of podcasting. | ||
| Man, covering everything here every day, you get so tossed into the mix that when you get out, when you're on your way home, you just realize you have so much in you to say, so much in you to vent. | ||
| And it was like that with the crew as well. | ||
| So basically, the idea started where I wanted to have the crew, a place where the crew could just come on and say whatever they wanted. | ||
| And the conversations just were magical. | ||
| They really were. It was crazy just to see how many articulate people who are well-versed in so many different areas just vent and just come off like an Alex Jones rant. | ||
| I'm like, man, there's more to this. | ||
| I feel like our fans really, really need a... | ||
| A different way to receive news sometimes. | ||
| A different message. | ||
| At the same time, I want to have fun. | ||
| We have to be able to make fun of all these people who are trying to, you know, infringe on all of our rights. | ||
| And it's so easy. Like, the comedic material is there. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It writes itself. You sit down in the classic Infowars podcast room that you retrofitted. | |
| You redid the whole thing. | ||
| And it's just nostalgic and new at the same time. | ||
| It's awesome. Dude, and once you get into that, you feel the energy. | ||
| You feel the nostalgia. | ||
| You feel just so connected to everything there. | ||
| I'm so glad that everybody who's come on so far has loved it. | ||
| And everybody, you know, they can't wait for the episodes to drop. | ||
| And I'm truly blessed to be able to be able to do this at all. | ||
| And it wouldn't be... I wouldn't be able to do anything if it wasn't for you fans. | ||
| If you shop at Infowarsstore.com, get an X3 DNA Force. | ||
| All the products that we sell... | ||
| If it wasn't for you guys supporting us, none of this would happen. | ||
| Chase wouldn't be sitting in this chair. | ||
| I wouldn't be going on the battle tank with Owen or us being able to go to Stop the Steal. | ||
| There's so many things, so many epic things that we've been able to do here at InfoWars, and it's all thanks to you. | ||
| Joining me now is Brianna Morello. | ||
| And I think, you know, she was having an issue. | ||
| She was trying to get into the white dudes for Harris event. | ||
| And I think that she had to convince them that, hey, how dare you assume what a woman is? | ||
| You don't even know what a woman is. | ||
| So I think she was able to sneak past the guards and get into the meeting. | ||
| And, you know, this whole thing is hilarious to me, Brianna, because I can't even imagine if, let's say, J.D. Vance or Donald Trump had a White Dudes for Trump or a White Dudes for Vance event. | ||
| Can you even imagine what the headlines would be? | ||
| But then they do it for Harris. | ||
| But then it was basically just an hours-long cringe-fest. | ||
| So were you able to sneak in, though? | ||
| Did you defy what a woman is, and did you make it into the White Dudes for Harris event? | ||
| Yeah, well, Owen, thank you for having me. | ||
| The only requirement upon, you know, attending was that you didn't have to have balls, and they didn't want anyone with balls, and so that's why I was able to speak my way in. | ||
| And you had to have a low T count, so I made my way in. | ||
| Ultimately, though, it was supposed to be a Zoom meeting, and I thought I was going to be able to get in to ask questions. | ||
| I wanted to grill a lot of these speakers, but unfortunately, they last-minute switched it up And broadcasted it over YouTube. | ||
| So it was very unfortunate, but you needed a link to get into it, it looks like. | ||
| And so I was able to make my way in there. | ||
| But they said over 100,000 people attended this meeting. | ||
| And I don't think it was 100,000. | ||
| I think it's a lot like what we saw back in 2020, where Joe Biden inflated all these numbers to make it seem like he was popular, but wasn't. | ||
| And so, yeah, it didn't seem authentic. | ||
| It didn't seem like it was anything to add. | ||
| Hold on a second. Now there could have been, I mean, half those people could have been tuning in for comedic value. | ||
| Yeah. Well, not many people knew that you could sneak into it. | ||
| And I had to make an alias email, so I went with a popular Dem social media influencer email address and made a Gmail to make sure that they were going to let me in. | ||
| And so I don't know if the vast majority of Americans knew to do that if they wanted to get into it. | ||
| But yeah, it was pretty solid, though, once I got in there. | ||
| I had to crunch it all down to two minutes. | ||
| But over the two hours or so that they went on for, I mean, I probably could have given you at least seven to ten minutes worth of content. | ||
| It was so bad, so cringe. | ||
| And they literally had no self-awareness. | ||
| Now, Owen, if you would have attended, they would have took turns kind of bashing you over the head and telling you that the white man's bad and you need to repent. | ||
| And that's kind of what they were doing to all of the men that were actually there. | ||
| There was a speaker too who wasn't white, who spoke out and was also kind of echoing just that, | ||
| saying, you know, I know if you're watching this, you're not like those mega white men, you're different. | ||
| And then he went on to guilting them for other things. | ||
| So it was entertaining, of course. | ||
| Well, it's this giant ritual that the Democrats, it's the ritual of identity politics. | ||
| And what they wanna do is they wanna guilt trip, specifically I would say black women, | ||
| but anybody that's not white, They want to guilt trip you. | ||
| If you don't vote for Harris, you're basically a race traitor. | ||
| I mean, my goodness, how could you think of such a thing? | ||
| Even if her policy is that you have to die, I mean, you don't want to betray your race and not vote for Harris. | ||
| And then there's the whole... | ||
| It's like... It's like a political cucking mechanism. | ||
| And it's like, oh, the white man is bad, but you're forgiven. | ||
| Like, we anoint you. | ||
| Just all you gotta do is be liberal. | ||
| Yeah, well, they also had a white women for Harris Zoom just a few days prior, and it was a bunch of white women telling other white women that we need to kind of push each other and help black women out, because black women can't get elected without the help of white women, of course. Oh, how racist. And that was the nudge. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, if I were to say that out loud, I would be deemed a KKK member, of course, and they would start making memes about that. | ||
| But when they say it, it's allowed. | ||
| I mean, it's literally the most hateful human beings on the face of this earth in one meeting. | ||
| It was interesting, too. One of their speakers actually said, you know, if there is a God, she's a woman, pretty much. | ||
| It was just so bizarre to sit here and listen to these people. | ||
| I mean, they're obviously, like, atheists. | ||
| They don't really have any souls, and they're trying to guilt others. | ||
| Well, it wasn't much of it about abortion? | ||
| Some of it was about abortion, yes. | ||
| I know Pete Buttigieg did touch upon that. | ||
| And that was strange in itself. | ||
| Well, we don't need Pete Buttigieg touching about anything, but I know he talked about abortion. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. Well, he was the interesting one, right? | ||
| Because he said that abortion is actually a male's right. | ||
| And I don't know what that means. Maybe a male's right to sleep around and not have to commit to any woman or commit to raising a family. | ||
| You know, I really don't even want to go here, but I might as well. | ||
| And let me be clear. I'm not encouraging this because I'm pro-life. | ||
| I'm just saying... Let's just go all the way with this logic then, because really the left says it's the woman's right to choose and the man shouldn't have any say in it. | ||
| Well, okay, so let's actually look for a logical conclusion that's consistent here. | ||
| Well, if a woman can abort her child and the man has no say, let's say the man wants to keep the baby, he supposedly has no say in the process, well then we should have laws That if the man doesn't want to have the child, then he should not be responsible for any child support. | ||
| He should not be on the hook for any responsibilities, child support, payments, whatever. | ||
| None of it. None of it. If the woman can say, oh, I don't want my baby, I'm removing responsibilities, I'm killing the baby, then why doesn't the man get the same equal treatment? | ||
| Again, I'm not calling for that. | ||
| I'm pro-life. I'm just saying, you notice how nobody's going that far? | ||
| You notice how nobody's pushing for men's rights in this whole thing? | ||
| Yeah, well, Pete Buttigieg says he is, but it's only when he wants to kill the babies, and that's about it. | ||
| Well, Pete Buttigieg gets into a medical gown and sits in a medical bed with his husband, pretending like they just gave birth. | ||
| Yeah, and he chest feeds, too. | ||
| It's an exhausting job, but somebody has to do it. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. The memes are great, though. | ||
| The dance is weird. Yeah. | ||
| No, fans is weird. | ||
| No, but this is what they do, right? | ||
| They do these things all the time. | ||
| It's bizarre, but it's expected, though, Owen. | ||
| I mean, these people are, they don't value life, but they pretend like they do. | ||
| Like you mentioned in the open too, they pretend like they love freedom, | ||
| but they don't actually love freedom. | ||
| Because if they were to love freedom, like they pretend like they do, | ||
| there would be policies that reflected just that, except it's the complete opposite. | ||
| They don't actually do the things that they say, but we all know that on the right. | ||
| We know that they're all hypocrites and that's just putting it nicely. | ||
| Because there's a couple of other words I could use for them at this point. | ||
| But it was really, really bad too on the call. | ||
| Because again, they were talking about things. | ||
| Oh, you're going to like this one, Owen. So one of the—oh, this is a great photo. | ||
| There was one moment on the call where the man who was kind of like running everything was talking about the pressures about being a white man and having to be leaders of these households that they're supposed to be leading. | ||
| And he was very upset about it. | ||
| He said— He should just advocate all responsibility to the woman, you know? | ||
| That's what they do, isn't that what they do? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Yeah, yeah. | |
| It's an absolute mess. | ||
| These guys are, it was a beta man crying fest. | ||
| It was an absolute disgrace. | ||
| But, I mean, that's what you have to do. | ||
| He's complaining about leadership roles. | ||
| So, I'm sorry, finish your statement. | ||
| Yeah, so he's complaining about leadership roles and he was complaining about masculinity and how that's pushed on all these men and that you have to be masculine. | ||
| You have to be able to be a defender for your household. | ||
| I'm sorry, but that is absolutely ridiculous. | ||
| The fact that he was so offended and so touched on it that he got very emotional and choked up on it. | ||
| No, but see, that's the problem is these people deny basic psychology, basic biology. | ||
| Even to the degree in which it hurts their own well-being. | ||
| Because what he's talking about is actually a real phenomenon. | ||
| And I covered these earlier with a different female guest. | ||
| And I said, is this true? | ||
| There's studies out there in polls where liberal men do identify as non-masculine. | ||
| Conservative men identify as masculine. | ||
| Liberal men don't identify as masculine. | ||
| And then there's follow-up stories or polls. | ||
| And liberal women say... | ||
| I don't want to date liberal men because they're non-masculine. | ||
| So, I mean, that's just basic human psychology. | ||
| That's basic biology. | ||
| That's what a woman wants. | ||
| Whether she's liberal or not, she can't help these instincts. | ||
| And so the liberal man is sitting here like, well, I've been turned into this weak-kneed bitch boy, soy boy, twig, and women don't love me. | ||
| Oh my gosh, the burden! | ||
| And then a woman shows up and she's like, yeah, I'm not attracted to you. | ||
| Yeah, well, I think naturally women are attracted to masculine men, and that's just how it's always going to be, regardless of how they try to push it. | ||
| But I don't understand why they're so against it. | ||
| They pretend to be fighters for the causes that they believe in, but they're physically incapable of being able to defend those causes that they said that they believe in. | ||
| And so... At what point do they realize that they are physically incapable of being able to protect the beliefs that they say that they actually want to believe in? | ||
| I just don't understand the logic behind any of this. | ||
| But there's also other studies, like you mentioned, Owen, in regards to men who tend to vote more on the left side of things and see things politically on the left, that their testosterone levels are significantly lower than they should be. | ||
| Dangerously low. Yeah, that should be the requirement before you go and vote. | ||
| Oh, come on. | ||
| Yeah. What? We're promoting white dudes for Harris. | ||
| They're in the Senate chambers. They're giving each other prostate exams. | ||
| That should be a billboard. | ||
| White dudes for Harris. Oh, man. | ||
| It's so bad. | ||
| It's so bad. But you know, they actually allegedly raised over $3 million for Kamal Harris during that. | ||
| Allegedly. I'm glad you said allegedly. | ||
| It's not very likely, Owen, that that actually took place. | ||
| Do you trust that bar that they were putting up? | ||
| I don't. No, no. | ||
| The bar was very, very low. | ||
| But they were pretending like this was like a massive fundraiser. | ||
| It's all about, listen, I strongly believe there's going to be a massive amount of election fraud coming up in November. | ||
| And I think they have to sit here and pretend like Kamala Harris has the support of the American people. | ||
| And so they're going to hold a lot of these virtual events to do just that. | ||
| They're going to pretend like, oh, like they said on the call, oh, there's 100,000 people watching live. | ||
| I don't think there's actually 100,000 people watching live. | ||
| I think that they're making those numbers up. | ||
| But why are we still doing virtual events? | ||
| Why not fill out arenas when you're getting 100,000 people to show up to these events? | ||
| Because they can't. And that's why they're pretending. | ||
| And so we're going to watch all these fake numbers kind of popping up everywhere and pretending like Kamala Harris has the support. | ||
| Again, she doesn't. She's not a very likable person. | ||
| We all know this. And we're watching the mainstream media also kind of manipulating the coverage on her. | ||
| Google, big tech, all these companies are now pretending like Kamala Harris is really a threat. | ||
| If you Google Donald Trump's name, Kamala Harris stories tend to generate now. | ||
| That's not accidental. | ||
| That's intentional. And they're pushing her as a presidential candidate, even though nobody likes her. | ||
| And so we'll see how this plays out. | ||
| I completely agree with you. | ||
| And again, I'm saying, you know, we're not running against Kamala Harris per se. | ||
| We're running against a corrupt system. | ||
| We're running against a corrupt establishment. | ||
| And the issue isn't Kamala's popularity. | ||
| The issue is, can we beat the voter fraud? | ||
| And so I see all these people that are saying, wow, Kamala's really winning. | ||
| She's a real threat. Well, it's not Kamala. | ||
| It's the voter fraud. | ||
| It's the mail-in ballots. | ||
| It's all the shenanigans that Democrats pull to win elections illegitimately. | ||
| It's not that Kamala Harris is popular or a threat. | ||
| That's all hype. It's actually amazing to me. | ||
| You know, I try not to anger right-wingers these days with some stuff. | ||
| I just tend to kind of let them go off. | ||
| But tell me if you agree. | ||
| What I've noticed now is that you have a certain segment of the right wing that the leftist propaganda actually works on. | ||
| And it's a real strange thing. | ||
| It's like the left-wing propaganda is actually working on the right wing where they're sitting here. | ||
| I mean, that whole thing yesterday was fake. | ||
| Like, hey, I'm the dude and I'm literally for Harris, man. | ||
| Like, oh, like two weeks ago, Joe Biden was sharp as a tack. | ||
| Oh, yeah, now you're all behind Harris. | ||
| I mean, give me a break. There were stories not even as long as a year ago... | ||
| They were trying to remove Harris. | ||
| The Obamas were saying Harris was a problem. | ||
| These were left-wing news outlets. | ||
| Politico, they said Harris is a problem. | ||
| She's got to go. So this whole thing is contrived. | ||
| This whole thing is fake. All this hype around Harris, the fundraising story, it was just cutting a check and changing the name from Biden to Harris. | ||
| But I've noticed right-wingers are really afraid of Harris. | ||
| Like, they actually think she's, like, really the big threat to beat Trump. | ||
| Hey, look, the threat is the same as before as the same threat that got Biden in. | ||
| It's not Harris. | ||
| Yeah, 100% I agree with that because ultimately he ran the campaign from his basement back in 2020 and then he magically won. | ||
| Now obviously we knew back then he wasn't very likable but he was able to secure the victory through fraud obviously and off he went and so I think that's the kind of same threat we're dealing with Kamala Harris but I also think it's important a lot of people tend to you know pivot when it comes to Kamala to all of her maybe dating stories and whatnot and I think it's important to Make sure we tell everyone, you know, we don't have this in the bag. | ||
| I think a lot of Americans need to get involved in their elections, and there are several ways you could do so. | ||
| But ultimately, we have to get involved because this election will be stolen if we allow them to do so. | ||
| They did it back in 2020 knowing damn right that the American people did not support Joe. | ||
| And they're doing it again in front of our own eyes. | ||
| I mean, we're watching all these last-minute pieces of legislation get shot down by the courts, too, still to this day. | ||
| I believe there was just another challenge in Michigan that we have unfortunately lost due to mail-in ballots again, mail-in ballots being counted after election day. | ||
| Yeah, Democrats are going to win Michigan for that reason, and probably Pennsylvania for that reason as well, unfortunately. | ||
| You know, that's how I'm measuring it, is where are these lawsuits going? | ||
| Republicans actually had a good win in Georgia and Arizona, but they had big losses in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. | ||
| And so, I mean, I really think that's what's going to determine the race. | ||
| It's not even going to be the votes, unfortunately. | ||
| It's going to be the voting laws. | ||
| Yeah, Owen, and I also want to drive home another point, too. | ||
| Let's say they miraculously do allow President Trump to win in November. | ||
| Those congressional races and the Senate races are also things we need to keep our eyes on because, ultimately, President Trump's not going to be able to get anything passed if they lock down both Congress and Senate to the left. | ||
| And I think that's another key point that people have to understand is they're going to pretend, maybe they might pretend like, hey, listen, our elections aren't legitimate. | ||
| There's no fraud here because, look, Trump is now back in the White House. | ||
| But they might have stolen a couple of congressional races to make sure that we didn't get those victories. | ||
| And so nothing will get passed. | ||
| And so those are other things that we need to look out for because, you know, in states like New York, you know, they put on the ballot. | ||
| This was a couple of years ago, I believe, during the pandemic around 2020. | ||
| They put on one of their ballots this question regarding universal mail-in ballots. | ||
| The New Yorkers ultimately rejected it and they didn't want it. | ||
| And it was a massive amount of New Yorkers who did so. | ||
| But what happened was we had Kathy Hochul, the governor right now, go out and instead of honoring what the New York people's wishes were, they instead decided to go and sign this piece of legislation into law because Democrats have the majority. | ||
| And so now people like my family members who are Democrats, registered Democrats in the state of New York, We're good to go. | ||
| Well, not in their name. | ||
| It'll be under a different name. | ||
| And it's like, oh, they meant to send it to the Democrat that lived there before you, or something else goes on. | ||
| So I have seen cases of that. | ||
| But again, all of this stuff behind Kamala is obvious propaganda and hype. | ||
| And again, I'm not sitting here saying, hey, it's over. | ||
| Trump's going to beat Kamala. We're up against the same corruption we were, whether it's Kamala, whether it's Biden, whether it's Obama, whether it's Clinton, it doesn't matter. | ||
| It's the same corruption. | ||
| It's the same deal. But, I mean, this is what they do. | ||
| Is they drum up all this hype. | ||
| It's like if a team signs a new player or something or like gets a new jersey design and then they just run this marketing hype to sell jerseys. | ||
| And so that's what the Democrats are doing right now with Kamala Harris. | ||
| There's a severe problem that the left wing has that's anti-Israel. | ||
| They're not going to vote for Kamala Harris. | ||
| They're out riding in the streets. | ||
| They're going to be riding probably during the Democrat National Convention. | ||
| So I'm sorry. I'm not buying the hype because you bring a bunch of Hollywood people onto a stream and because you do a bunch of fake fundraising numbers and because you run a bunch of marketing gimmicks. | ||
| I'm not even convinced Kamala is going to be their final nominee. | ||
| Yeah, I don't think so either. I was actually asking a bunch of attorneys as well to see. | ||
| So obviously the money has to stay with whoever's on the ticket. | ||
| And as of right now, you know, obviously it was Joe Biden. | ||
| Well, that's why those record funds are frozen right now. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. Well, I wonder who she picks for VP. I think that's going to be a tallying point, right? | ||
| Whoever she picks for VP, if that money could be transferred to them if they take Kamala off the top of the ticket. | ||
| I've asked a couple lawyers. | ||
| They actually don't know the direct answer if that's even legal or not. | ||
| So I think that's what's going to be kind of the concerning part in all of this is whether that money could be transferred to whoever the VP is if they take over the ticket. | ||
| But they still haven't even announced it. | ||
| And you're not really hearing much in the way of reporting on it. | ||
| But like you just mentioned, I want to get back to the fact that the left is always in sync. | ||
| So unfortunately, on the right, there's a lot of inner fighting. | ||
| And I think we do it too publicly sometimes because the left, even if they don't like something, they tend to just all get in line and they don't they don't have their outrage on public display. | ||
| And I think that's what we need to kind of focus on, too, because. | ||
| It really helps Democrats. | ||
| The drama, the internal drama for Republicans doesn't really help too much. | ||
| So I'd like to see a little bit more of unity when it comes to Republicans. | ||
| Now I get it. That sounds kind of rhino-ish at times, depending upon what policies I'm talking about. | ||
| But Ultimately, when it comes to backing candidates, I think we need to be more unified on that messaging. | ||
| There shouldn't be so many, I guess, critics on that front. | ||
| Because sometimes it's good, but sometimes it's not. | ||
| And I sat back watching them go after Joe Biden and was laughing about it. | ||
| And I'm sure you were as well, Owen, because we rarely see drama within the Democratic Party. | ||
| And so I think it was interesting to kind of sit back and watch. | ||
| Well, and look, I don't really do red on red. | ||
| I don't really go right to right when it comes to my commentary or my attacks. | ||
| But I would echo what you're saying. | ||
| The time for this dissent inside the right wing is after we win the White House and hopefully Congress. | ||
| That's the time for this dissent. | ||
| It's kind of an odd phenomenon that I'm seeing where... | ||
| It's the same right-wingers that will complain that we never win, and it's like finally we're in a position to win, and we've got momentum in our sales, and some people are deciding to take a knife to the sales. | ||
| And it's like, hey, wait, hold on a second. | ||
| Wait, wait, wait to sort out all this stuff until we win. | ||
| And so it's kind of this weird thing where I think people are getting ahead of it right now, And it's kind of like, you know, they say like a black pill or a doomer pill or they're not doing enough on this issue or they're not doing enough on this issue or they're bad on this issue and it's like, hey, let's sort all this out after we win. | ||
| Like, do you really want to engage in this infighting right now and have a Democrat in the White House or would you rather get a right-wing Congress and a White House and then deal with these issues? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. No, that's 100% right. | ||
| And you know who comes to mind when we talk about this? | ||
| Kevin McCarthy. He is over here right now trying to challenge Congressman Matt Gaetz in the state of Florida with a rhino because he's upset because Congressman Matt Gaetz hurt his feelings. | ||
| And so he is challenging him. | ||
| And it's not just Matt Gaetz. | ||
| It's been other conservative Republicans Who voted to oust him as speaker. | ||
| And so instead of doing what's best for the party, he's doing best for his ego. | ||
| And that's why he bat out of Congress and he lost that seat and so much more. | ||
| So it's infuriating to see Former Speaker Kevin McCarthy doing all of this. | ||
| But no one's calling him out for it. | ||
| We allow him to continue to go on. | ||
| We allow him to continue to host fundraisers. | ||
| And very few people call him out for causing a lot of this internal drama. | ||
| Yeah, you got your feelings hurt. So what? | ||
| So what? You're a loser. | ||
| You bowed out and you abandoned people. | ||
| Exactly. Exactly. He did it to himself. | ||
| And again, that's what I'm talking about. It's like, we're actually getting a hold of the Republican Party from the Republican establishment. | ||
| I mean, what they call Con Inc has had to change its culture and its rhetoric in the last two years. | ||
| And I see people like complaining at us gaining ground politically. | ||
| And I'm just like, what in the heck is going on? | ||
| But anyway, I don't really go right on right. | ||
| I don't do red on red, so I don't really talk about it. | ||
| I just focus on the issues and trying to win in November, and I know you're the same way. | ||
| We only had you scheduled for a segment, but I'm curious. | ||
| Can you do another segment? Yeah. | ||
| I gotta play this video, guys. | ||
| When we play this video coming up, I would suggest don't be drinking any coffee. | ||
| Don't be drinking any milk. | ||
| Don't have a glass of Turbo Force in front of you. | ||
| Don't have a glass of vitamin or fusion. | ||
| What David Hogg said in the aftermath of the white dudes for Harris, little deal, little | ||
| digital deal yesterday, I'm not kidding you. | ||
| When I heard this this morning, I let out a belly laugh. | ||
| I think I probably stirred my neighbors and they were wondering what the hell was going | ||
| on. | ||
| One of the funniest things you'll ever hear on the other side of this break, Brianna Morello | ||
| is our guest. | ||
| And maybe we'll get her take on the Senate hearing today as well before we hear from | ||
| Mike Lee in the final segment of this hour. | ||
| It's all coming up here halfway through now in the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We'll be right back. Oh my gosh. | ||
| All right, Brianna Murillo with us for another segment. | ||
| All right, now maybe it's just me. | ||
| Maybe it's just me. | ||
| I'll kind of test run it with the crew. | ||
| It could just be me. But I think David Hogg is about to deliver one of the greatest one-liners in the history of politics. | ||
| This was him in the aftermath being interviewed on CNN about the white dudes for Harris stunt yesterday. | ||
| Here it is, clip nine. David, let's bring you in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want to know, you were on a donor call with VP Harris Friday, if I'm not mistaken. | |
| Tell us about that, because she was on that call. | ||
| I believe you asked her question. And why do you think it's important to be on this one tonight? | ||
| I think it's important to show that we aren't just white dudes for Kamala, but also that we're younger white dudes, we're older white dudes, we're people of all ages for Kamala. | ||
| And I also have to note, too, that this would not have been possible. | ||
| This was inspired by, you know, following in the footsteps of Black Woman for Kamala, which was one of the first calls that was set up. | ||
| And I was on that National Finance Committee call earlier, and I can just say that the Vice President is fired up, young people are fired up, people of all ages are fired up, and they're donating. | ||
| Just after it was announced that the Vice President was going to become the nominee, I set out a challenge to people to raise $100,000 on Twitter in one hour for the vice president. | ||
| And not only did we do that, we ended up raising about $345,000 to support the vice president from over 6,000 people around the country. | ||
| So people are fired up and we're ready to be out there. | ||
| Oh, that's the wrong clip. | ||
| Oh, man, I sent the wrong clip. | ||
| I gotta find the right clip. I just totally blew that. | ||
| Brianna, let me find the right clip. | ||
| That's on me. That's on me. | ||
| But you know what? Now the buildup intensifies. | ||
| Did you watch? | ||
| I'm gonna find the right clip. I'm gonna find the right clip. | ||
| I'm gonna get on it. No pressure. | ||
| I'm gonna find the right clip. Talk about the Senate hearing. | ||
| You're taking over host duties right now. | ||
| I have to pass them on to you. I gotta find the right clip. | ||
| I'm gonna send it to the crew. This was a massive failure on my part. | ||
| It's okay. I can cover for you, Owen. | ||
| Well, so the Senate hearing is obviously taking place earlier today. | ||
| The acting Secret Service director, at least he fessed up to Secret Service being an absolute failure. | ||
| I'll give him that, and I'll say that very nicely. | ||
| But ultimately, he did take ownership, probably because he saw the beating that the previous... | ||
| Secret Service Director received for not being so transparent received. | ||
| And so he said yes. | ||
| Okay. It was an epic failure. | ||
| We're kind of going through it all. | ||
| We're trying to figure out where the failures lie. | ||
| But again, nobody has been fired. | ||
| Like I just said, the previous Secret Service Director had to resign because nobody pushed her out. | ||
| She should have been fired, but she wasn't. | ||
| Now, interesting enough as well, When you kind of work through it, when they're talking about, oh, you know, well, we didn't really know that the shooter was on the roof. | ||
| It's interesting because they're just now admitting to this. | ||
| We only know this, and the only reason why Secret Service is forced to admit this is because local law enforcement agencies are outing them. | ||
| Secret Service and the FBI were probably going to throw local PD under the bus. | ||
| We saw that when they were talking about protecting the roofs, and that wasn't their job, and they weren't in charge of the structure where the shooter did climb up on. | ||
| That wasn't Secret Service's role. | ||
| But ultimately, thankfully, local police officers Department's are coming out and saying, no, no, no, this was all Secret Service. | ||
| And so they're getting ahead of the story, which I greatly appreciate, because so many times we watch the FBI and Secret Service kind of lie to the American people, and it needs to be told. | ||
| Now, during the hearings today, we also learned that the communications that Secret Service had weren't archived. | ||
| Isn't that unfortunate? So now you won't be able to see and hear what specifically was said behind the scenes. | ||
| So they're gonna, you know, play stupid and pretend like certain things weren't said because they don't really have the records. | ||
| Well, I'm gonna have to scour for this piece. | ||
| I'm so upset. | ||
| I'm so upset. It's just... | ||
| Owen. It's in the clip, but it's an extended clip. | ||
| It got cut short in the clip I sent the crew, and so I sent them the wrong clip. | ||
| It's 100% on me. | ||
| Oh, my gosh. And I'm telling you, it's the funniest thing. | ||
| It's the funniest one-liner from Hogg you're ever going to hear in your life. | ||
| Well, then reenact it, Owen. | ||
| Let's see you reenact it. No, no. | ||
| I can't deliver it like him because he's like... | ||
| I can't, I can't, it has to come from Hogg. | ||
| It has to come from Hogg for it to be funny because, look, these people are so just disingenuous and They will say the most ridiculous things with a straight face that it's hilarious at times. | ||
| That's what I'm saying. I bet half the people tuned into that white dudes for Harris thing just for a laugh because it was so ridiculous. | ||
| But anyway, getting back to the hearing today, as you know, I filed a FOIA request last night. | ||
| Myself and my attorney filed a FOIA request. | ||
| Well, thank you. But what's going to be interesting is Secret Service has 20 days to respond. | ||
| The local police, the Pennsylvania police, the Butler police, they have five days to | ||
| respond. So, you know, let's see. Let's see what kind of a power struggle, if you will, | ||
| there is right now between local police and Secret Service, you know, where maybe the | ||
| local police are sick of getting blamed for everything by the Secret Service. | ||
| And maybe they're saying, hey, you know what? | ||
| Here, we'll give you. | ||
| We'll give you all the video. | ||
| We'll give you all the audio. | ||
| I mean, that's just amongst the things we requested. | ||
| And so maybe they will just turn over everything just to say like, hey, look, Secret Service blames us for everything. | ||
| Here's everything. They want to blame us for everything. | ||
| Here's everything we have. You can decide what to do. | ||
| Like, for example, they admitted today they have a dash cam video of the shooter climbing onto the roof. | ||
| They have it. They had it on video. | ||
| Yeah, but remember they told you they didn't know if he used a ladder to get on the roof or not? | ||
| So again, they're full of it. | ||
| But I actually agree with you because Senator Chuck Grassley has been getting all that body cam footage from local police departments and it has not been the feds. | ||
| And then we heard also today during the hearing that they're not cooperating. | ||
| Secret Service has not really been cooperating and handing over the names of individuals | ||
| who are in charge of certain things. | ||
| And so I think it's interesting to see how they're gonna try to deflect. | ||
| But when I was over at the RNC, I went around asking members of Congress if we could trust | ||
| the FBI, and everyone said no. | ||
| Even Congressman or Chairman Jim Jordan also kind of hinted at no. | ||
| So they're getting aggressive with it. | ||
| But Owen, what were your thoughts? | ||
| Because I thought they just set up a committee to kind of look into all of this. | ||
| And besides Clay Higgins, I don't think there was anybody else really credible on there. | ||
| It's all kind of a bunch of rhino, quiet Republicans, nobody who's aggressive besides Clay Higgins, of course, to get to all of the information. | ||
| So I'm not too confident that a congressional committee is really going to get to the truth on any of this. | ||
| What do you think? I reached the exact same conclusion. | ||
| It's not to say that the other members on the committee are I'm untrustworthy. | ||
| I would say maybe I'm neutral on them for the most part, but that's not a strong opinion. | ||
| I'd rather feel strongly about somebody on this really important committee. | ||
| I agree. It's Clay Higgins. | ||
| By the way, Eli Crane has responded. | ||
| He was left off. | ||
| He's just a Marine sniper. | ||
| He was left off. He says, We're good to go. | ||
| If you really wanted the truth and accountability, you wouldn't punish the most qualified people because they don't vote for your debt-laden spending bills. | ||
| That's the signal here. | ||
| Vote for spending or your time in Congress will be on the sidelines. | ||
| So do you agree with Matt Gaetz that this is a political punishment? | ||
| Yeah, well, keep in mind, Speaker Johnson was the one who wanted to blur out the faces of those who were on the J6 surveillance footage, and he has not yet released all the footage like he said he was going to. | ||
| So I think a lot of this is political at this point, and he's just a lost cause. | ||
| You know, I tried confronting him when I was at the RNC as well, and he's a runner to that guy, so it's very hard to catch up with him. | ||
| But again, he's like Kevin McCarthy 2.0, maybe even worse because we get a little bit of a higher expectation for him because he claims to be a constitutional attorney. | ||
| Absolute failure on this front. | ||
| I'm hopeful, though, that a lot of these members of Congress, like Congressman Cory Mills, are going to create these other committees or these other investigative committees to kind of look into it themselves because they see right through it. | ||
| Obviously, they also have a little bit of back information on all of this and they know that Speaker Johnson is probably compromised at this point. | ||
| All right. I'm sorry. | ||
| I really wanted to get that clip for you. | ||
| I'm going to try to find it, but I'm not going to hold you over. | ||
| I know you're guest hosting another show tonight, so I'm not going to hold you over there with your brand new setup there that you're hosting a show on later, as well as your own show, the Brianna Morello Show. | ||
| So I thank you for your extended time today. | ||
| I'm sorry I let you down with the clip, but if you stay tuned in, hopefully we'll be able to find it later, and if you're looking for a good laugh, we'll be able to deliver. | ||
| I'll stay watching, Owen. Thank you. | ||
| Alright, Brianna Morello leaves us now. | ||
| Always good to be joined by her. | ||
| Alright. I'm going to try to find that clip. | ||
| It's driving me crazy. | ||
| Alright? I'm just... | ||
| I'm all in knots inside. | ||
| Okay? I'm dying inside. | ||
| Because I failed to deliver this clip. | ||
| I failed. Like Secret Service. | ||
| Alright, the crew has done it. | ||
| They have found the clip. | ||
| I could be crazy. | ||
| I'm telling you, I laughed so hard when I heard this, though. | ||
| So, I don't know. Maybe I'm crazy. | ||
| Maybe you'll laugh as hard as me. | ||
| I probably sold it too much, though, and now it's just a non-starter. | ||
| Alright. We still got a lot to cover here. | ||
| I got a lot of clips. We're going to go back to the hearing one more time. | ||
| Remember, folks, if you like this show, I really hope you will support us by shopping at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| It would mean a lot to me. It would mean a lot to the crew. | ||
| It would mean a lot to Alex Jones. | ||
| So, shop at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| The Save InfoWars mega sale is live. | ||
| Let me just tell you about some of the products we have on sale right now. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion drink mix, 25% off. | ||
| I start every day with Vitamin Mineral Fusion because... | ||
| I get more than 100% of my daily vitamins and minerals. | ||
| The daily value. More than 100% in Vitamin Mineral Fusion. | ||
| And it tastes great. Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine. | ||
| This stuff sells out fast, just like Vitamin Mineral Fusion. | ||
| What are you doing to work against the bad halogen, the fluoride they put in the water? | ||
| And what are you doing to deal with iodine deficiency, which is so important for so many health issues? | ||
| Survival Shield X2 is the answer. | ||
| Vitamin B12 Ultra 12 liquid tincture. | ||
| Pure vitamin B12 formula, 40% off. | ||
| DNA Force Plus, the flagship elite supplement about cellular production and telomere support. | ||
| DNA Force Plus, 40% off. | ||
| Vaso Beat Complete and Nitric Boost, both 40% off. | ||
| These products are key when it comes to cardiovascular health, blood health. | ||
| What are you doing to address your cardiovascular health? | ||
| What are you doing to address your blood flow? | ||
| Very important stuff. | ||
| I personally like Vaso Beat Complete because it's a liquid tincture. | ||
| I can put it in a drink and drink it down. | ||
| Whereas Nitric Boost comes in the capsule form. | ||
| Both work great. Both 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Ultimate Fish Oil. So many people take fish oil. | ||
| It's well known for a lot of different health benefits. | ||
| It's one of the top things people have in their supplement pantries. | ||
| So we hope that you will shop with us and get your fish oil from InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 40% off. | ||
| And what are you doing? | ||
| Are you fiber deficient? | ||
| Think about that. Are you getting enough fiber in your diet? | ||
| If not, prebiotic fiber is right now 60% off. | ||
| 60% off prebiotic fiber right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| You get a great product, you support your health, and you support this transmission in the process. | ||
| Okay. We've still got a lot coming up. | ||
| Including, we're going to hear from Mike Lee. | ||
| In the hearing today. So we'll go back to that. | ||
| We've got a couple other updates from the Kamala Harris camp. | ||
| And then what is the answer to white dudes for Harris? | ||
| We've got the answer for that on the Trump side. | ||
| So all kinds of stuff and issues we're still going to get into. | ||
| All right, here's the clip that I blew earlier. | ||
| I probably blew it because maybe you won't find it as funny as me. | ||
| I'll tell you, when I heard David Hogg say this about Kamala Harris, I almost fell down the stairs this morning. | ||
| I was almost injured. | ||
| I almost had to spend the day in the emergency room. | ||
| I could have broken a leg. | ||
| It was so bad. I might have been coming in in a wheelchair today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I almost fell over the stairs when David Hogg said this on CNN. One, I think it's that because we're constantly seeing her on our social media and she's authentic and she's funny. | |
| You know, we see her constantly out there talking. | ||
| One, I think it's that because we're constantly seeing her on our social media and she's authentic. | ||
| She's authentic. You know, we see her constantly out there. | ||
| I'm sorry, guys. | ||
| Am I too much? Is that too much? | ||
| She's authentic. | ||
| Guys, Kamala Harris. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If there's one thing Kamala is not, it's authentic. | |
| Man. Maybe it's just me. | ||
| Who does David Hogg look like, by the way? | ||
| Let's not even go down that road. | ||
| Maybe it's just me. | ||
| But I'm telling you, when I heard him refer to Kamala Harris as authentic, I almost busted my leg on the stairs because I fell over from laughter. | ||
| I mean, there is no stretch. | ||
| There is no lie. | ||
| There is no level of disingenuousness right now that the American left, the liberal, the Democrat will not engage in. | ||
| So it's like, they just can't be honest about anything. | ||
| How about that great economy? | ||
| Private sector job openings at a six-year low. | ||
| Why? Because illegal aliens are getting hired. | ||
| Hires plunge the most in a year-over-year to lowest since April 2020 during the pandemic. | ||
| Why? Well, because they're off-record hiring non-citizens. | ||
| Quits tumble to lowest since COVID crash. | ||
| I guess people are quitting their job looking for a new job because they can't afford their bills. | ||
| Greatest economy ever, Jack. Gigantic retailer closing doors of 559 stores across America. | ||
| It's hard to think about buying furniture when consumers are having a hard time putting food on the table. | ||
| Cons Incorporated is now bearing the brunt of that reality. | ||
| They filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 23, 2024. | ||
| 559 stores will be closed, according to the court filings. | ||
| And that's going to be nearly 4,000 jobs across 15 states. | ||
| The greatest economy ever, Jack. | ||
| We got the greatest economy ever! | ||
| Look at the jobs ever! | ||
| Come on, man! | ||
| Oh, Kamala will do so much better for the economy, though. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Won't she? And look. | |
| You don't need headlines to tell you this, and this is why I think you have to remove the average American from the conversation that we have. | ||
| They don't follow politics. | ||
| They're not watching news. | ||
| They don't know. | ||
| They're not getting the stories. | ||
| They're not getting the headlines. They might get the propaganda, but the real world overwhelms it. | ||
| They're going to the grocery store and paying 30%, sometimes 40% more What they were paying five years ago. | ||
| They're going to the gas pump and paying double, double what they were paying five years ago. | ||
| They're getting their energy bills and it's skyrocketing from what it was five years ago. | ||
| They know their dollar isn't going as far. | ||
| But yeah, have you tried to buy furniture recently? | ||
| Have you tried to buy furniture recently? | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| Especially if you want to buy something with real wood. | ||
| Furniture prices are nuts. | ||
| Truly, they are nuts. | ||
| Go out and just try to buy a new dinner table. | ||
| You'd be stunned what a wooden table costs. | ||
| You're going to pay thousands of dollars. | ||
| It's the Biden economy. It's the greatest economy ever. | ||
| So people know that. | ||
| People see that. By the way, we showed the protest yesterday. | ||
| There was a protest in New York where... | ||
| You had a bunch of Asian-Americans, specifically an Asian-American group, thousands of them protesting against the illegal migrants taking over their cities. | ||
| This is the stuff that people are seeing and they know who to attribute it as well. | ||
| Now it's happening again in New York City in Clinton Hill, clip 14. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Some here are frightened now just to go outside. | |
| Now it feels like that whole section is just not available to the community anymore. | ||
| Our parks are not available anymore. | ||
| You can't go to the parks. | ||
| Migrants from a 4,000 bed shelter nearby fill the sidewalks. | ||
| They sit on park benches, on stoops and curbs, under the BQE overpass. | ||
| So many people crowded in here, residents feared what was coming. | ||
| We have been witnessing the escalation in violence on the street and in the community for months now. | ||
| We've been pleading with the mayor, as we've seen increased violence, that this was going to be inevitable. | ||
| And on Sunday night, it came. | ||
| Two people were murdered here, a third critically injured just outside one of the two adjacent shelters in Clinton Hill. | ||
| It is a neighborhood now pleading for help. | ||
| Presidents came together tonight to demand the city provide more protection for them now and move to downsize the two enormous and crowded migrant shelters in Clinton Hill. | ||
| The Democrats have defunded the police and funded the illegal immigrant invasion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
People together safely. | |
| Do you believe us now? | ||
| How many more murders will it take? | ||
| This video is responsible for the two Sunday night murders. | ||
| In the video, he appears to be putting a gun in his waistband. | ||
| The mayor today didn't offer much hope, saying police are looking at a violent Venezuelan street gang as the people behind the shootings. | ||
| They're extremely dangerous. | ||
| We're dealing with violent individuals that are not representative of the overwhelming number of people who are coming here. | ||
| So here's the problem. Oh, it's not, oh, it's not, oh, and it's not the poor illegal immigrants. | ||
| It's not the poor illegal aliens. | ||
| No, this is all bad policy, folks. | ||
| So you just hope these people are smart enough to stop voting Democrat. | ||
| Whatever, you don't want to vote Republicans, fine. | ||
| Just please be smart enough to stop voting for the Democrats that are doing this to you. | ||
| Or you are the definition of insane. | ||
| Alright, you want to see mass propaganda? | ||
| You want to see Democrat Party propaganda? | ||
| As if you haven't seen enough, here's just more foolproof evidence that this is how the Democrat Party and the mainstream media operate hand-in-hand to deceive, brainwash, and propagandize the American people. | ||
| The script went out. | ||
| The orders went out. J.D. Vance is weird. | ||
| Some of what he and his running mate are saying, well, it's just plain weird. | ||
| These guys are just weird. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's where they are. As weird and creepy as J.D. Vance. | |
| Super weird idea from J.D. Vance. | ||
| Yeah, it's not. I mean, it's quite weird. | ||
| They're just plain weird. Just plain weird. | ||
| Just plain weird. | ||
| That stuff is weird. They come across weird and then they start being weird. | ||
| Yeah, they're weird. Being a really weird. | ||
| He's such a weirdo. Donald Trump and his weirdo running mate. | ||
| They're weird. Deeply and profoundly weird. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's really weird. Publican weirdness goes even deeper. | |
| He said a lot of things that are weird. | ||
| A weird style that he brings. | ||
| Weird policies. I want to start with the weird thing, because it is a thing. | ||
| Just plain weird. What was weird was talking about Diet Mountain Dew. | ||
| Who drinks Diet Mountain Dew? | ||
| Who ever seen the guy laugh? | ||
| That seems very weird to me that an adult can go through six and a half years of being in the public eye. | ||
| If he has laughed, it's at someone, not with someone. | ||
| That is weird behavior. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Weird and cultish. | |
| These are weird people on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He kind of doubled down on his weird ideas. | |
| I think weird is probably generous. | ||
| Simply weird. These guys are just plain weird. | ||
| Dance as weird. | ||
| You know, as the campaign said, We're not afraid of weird people. | ||
| The other side, they're just weird. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why are you being so weird? No matter what kind of weird stuff they keep saying. | |
| Trump and Vance Are just weird. | ||
| In addition, it should be dangerous to democracy. | ||
| It's the weird part that's the most engaging. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whom he addressed as my beautiful Christians, which was super weird. | |
| Weird tech bro J.D. Vance. | ||
| He's a weird guy. | ||
| J.D. Vance, uneasy and sort of weird. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Frankly, for lack of a better word, that he's weird. | |
| Parcastic remarks that aren't even funny, and he kind of shows that he can't really deliver a one-liner. | ||
| So Sam, weird is the word here in terms of initial impressions from Vance to the American public. | ||
| Once again, great work by Grabian. | ||
| Yeah. Let's see in two minutes, guys, how much weirdness we can actually talk about. | ||
| Who's really weird? | ||
| The Democrat Party... | ||
| That hosts Marina Abramovich spirit cooking parties. | ||
| And I'm sorry to be graphic here, but you want to talk about weird. | ||
| Marina Abramovich spirit cooking parties that feature semen, blood, and feces that they rub on the wall and rub on themselves. | ||
| How about the Podestas and their weird art? | ||
| You ever seen that? You want to talk about weird? | ||
| How about the fact that the White House has invited... | ||
| Transgender individuals to the White House dozens of times. | ||
| Some men with beards as tall as 6'6", with huge beards that wear dresses and dance and gyrate. | ||
| Some of them just outright get naked and flash the cameras on the White House. | ||
| You want to talk about weird? | ||
| How's that for weird? | ||
| How about a Democrat Party platform of abortion up to birth? | ||
| That's not weird? Abortion up to birth? | ||
| A beating heart? | ||
| A child that can feel? | ||
| That's not weird? | ||
| How about a Democrat party that thinks men can get pregnant? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? They think men can have periods! | |
| Is that weird? | ||
| How about a Democrat Party that runs Joe Biden around the White House? | ||
| He can't walk. He can't talk. | ||
| They have to traffic cone him around with an Easter bunny, and then they tell you he's sharp as a tack. | ||
| Is that not weird? | ||
| Who's really weird? | ||
| Who's really weird here? | ||
| A Democrat Party that promotes turning your child over to the state and And if the child asks the government to have a sex change surgery, they will receive it and they don't have to tell the parents? | ||
| Who's really weird here? | ||
| But forget about who's weird or not. | ||
| Do you see how the Democrat Party propaganda works? | ||
| The script goes out, the orders go out, there you have it. | ||
| I think Vance should just lean into the weirdness. | ||
| Maybe do an ad like, they call me weird. | ||
| And then show all their weird tactics, like just a 60 second clip of all the Democrat weirdness, just a mass like compilation, like quick cut compilation of all their weirdness. | ||
| And then at the end of it be like, but you know what? | ||
| Maybe I'm a little weird compared to these D.C. establishment politicos. | ||
| I'd lean into it. And do not doubt me. | ||
| And look, you know J.D. Vance is not my big pick, but Trump made it, so let's work with it going forward. | ||
| Do not doubt me on this. | ||
| I'm getting a lot of pushback. | ||
| I'm telling you, folks, J.D. Vance resonates with women. | ||
| And you might think that sounds crazy, but I'm telling you. | ||
| Because it's the opposite of the leftist propaganda that you know exists, but somehow sometimes people still fall for it. | ||
| No, J.D. Vance resonates with women. | ||
| They get the crazy cat lady vibes. | ||
| Mothers understand what he's talking about when it comes to childless women. | ||
| But more importantly, it's the middle-aged and older females that probably might not even vote. | ||
| But why do they like J.D. Vance? | ||
| Because he reminds them of their sons. | ||
| I'm telling you. Don't believe me? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ask your mom how she feels about Vance. | |
| Do not doubt me on this, folks. | ||
| And the more they attack Vance, that's only going to mobilize these mothers even more because they're going to see it as their son getting attacked. | ||
| So that's how I see it. | ||
| All right. I want to go back to the hearing one more time, and then we'll get to some of this other news. | ||
| I want to go back to the hearing one more time here, an important question-answer session with Mike Lee in his time, clip 17. | ||
| Why was President Trump allowed to take the stage at 6.02 p.m., exactly 17 minutes, after multiple suspicious person reports were provided, complete with photos and information suggesting that the assailant had a rangefinder, something that ordinary people don't use in this kind of circumstance? | ||
| Senator, again, it was suspicion, not weapon, or there was never communication of that there was an individual with a gun or threat or other bad intentions. | ||
| How many suspicious person reports did you receive that day? | ||
| I'll get back to you on the exact number, but there were other individuals that came to the attention of law enforcement that day. | ||
| Would President Biden ever be allowed on stage under similar circumstances with an unresolved set of multiple suspicious person reports provided, including indicating that there was a rangefinder involved? | ||
| Senator, I can tell you that a suspicious person on the outer perimeter with local law enforcement attempting to locate would happen, but I would need more information as far as whether or not we would allow the president to go on or off. | ||
| Again, for us, it comes down to weapon, a potential threat. | ||
| Is the individual carrying an IED? Is there a weapon? | ||
| Is there some other weapon? | ||
| Is there any factor that now ramps up our attention to let's hold off on this? | ||
| If there were eight shell casings found next to the assailant's body, but he was neutralized after the first shot, where did those other shots come from? | ||
| Where did the other shots go? | ||
| As far as the assailants shooting? | ||
| Yes. So did the assailant get out eight shots, or were there shell casings left from the day before? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where did they come from? The shooter center, we believe, fired eight rounds. | |
| We had the shooting reconstruction team go out there for a period of days and collect all that. | ||
| So we have bullet holes, bullet fragmentation all taken back, and we're still putting together the Trajectory and ballistic analysis, although we do have fragments of the bullets, and bullets have been collected in the distance from the shooter's weapon. | ||
| Got you, got you. It's my understanding there was a sniper team assigned to a window with complete overlook, complete view of the roof, the same rooftop, sloped rooftop, where the shots were fired. | ||
| It's also my understanding, according to some whistleblower accounts, that that post was abandoned. | ||
| What can you tell me about that? | ||
| Why was it abandoned? So I saw that from the colonel's testimony, sir, and it's something that I've asked and our mission assurance is getting to the bottom of. | ||
| And there were two two-man counter-sniper teams from the locals that were in that AGR building. | ||
| And so at some point they just left? | ||
| I don't have an answer for you on that, Senator, but it seems to me that if even one of them left, there should have been remaining some additional eyes left in that building. | ||
| That seems like something that maybe should be one of the very first questions you address. | ||
| I'm actually surprised that you don't know that already, and I'd ask that you submit to us in writing what you learn as soon as you learn it. | ||
| Will you commit to that? Yes, sir. | ||
| What can you tell me about, let me just state this this way. | ||
| Multiple requests were made. | ||
| By Trump's protective detail and by Trump's campaign team to the Secret Service for additional resources. | ||
| I'm told that those were denied. | ||
| And as I recall, the Secret Service spokesperson initially denied that such requests were made and denied. | ||
| Why not tell the truth from the outset? | ||
| What were they trying to do there? | ||
| So, Senator, I don't think there was any intention to mislead. | ||
| It seems like a pretty material fact, isn't it? | ||
| I saw that report. | ||
| Go ahead, Senator. Will you commit to me that you will submit to us in writing what requests were made by whom and to whom and when they were denied? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I will, sir. Okay. | |
| Look, at the end of the day, we're looking at a situation in which, at a minimum, People knew that this guy had a gun at least two minutes before the shooting happened. | ||
| I want to know what you can tell me about what happened during that final two-minute period. | ||
| Where a whole bunch of people in the crowd saw and were shouting, he's got a gun. | ||
| During that two-minute period, perhaps at the beginning of it, the local police started to climb the rooftop, and there was at least 30 seconds after which local police were able to personally observe the shooter with a gun, had the gun pointed at him. | ||
| What happened during that time period, and why on earth was President Trump not removed from the stage at that moment? | ||
| So again, Senator, I'll The reason why President Trump was not removed was, again, we did not have anything more than locals working an issue at the 3 o'clock, wasn't determined as to whether or not it was the same individual or not, and there was no report. | ||
| The same individual as what? | ||
| The same suspicious individual. | ||
| Right, but we've left the category of suspicious individual at that point. | ||
| You've got a guy with a gun on a rooftop 136 yards away from the stage, you know that he's got a gun at that point. | ||
| What happened during that time period that did not result in President Trump, his protective detail, being notified of that, and him immediately being removed from the situation? | ||
| Senator, what I will say, and then I'll turn it over to Deputy Director Abate. | ||
| No information regarding a weapon on the roof was ever passed to our personnel. | ||
| How is that even possible? | ||
| Do you want to comment to that? | ||
| Senator, again, I believe that information, and this is probably something my colleague can expound on, information that was in law enforcement, local law enforcement channels, but did not cross over and make it to Secret Service awareness. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Senator, just to clarify the timeline, so the individual was first seen by law enforcement on the roof at about 6.08. | |
| We're still working to perfect the timeline based on the radio comms and all that. | ||
| It wasn't until at 6... | ||
| 6.11.03 seconds, the officer saw him and called out his arm. | ||
| That was the first sighting where he had the rifle on the roof. | ||
| And that was relayed to the Secret Service Command Center? | ||
|
unidentified
|
My understanding is no, Secret Service, it was not relayed to them. | |
| It's a narrower time frame, though. | ||
| It's probably about maybe up to half a minute between the time he's seen with the rifle and when the shots are fired. | ||
| But there's still time. | ||
| At that point, if there were an open channel of communication in which they were able to tell him, he's got a gun, take him out. | ||
| You could still take President Trump off the stage. | ||
| You could have him duck. You could have the shooter neutralized. | ||
| Do you not have a channel of communication by which they can say, gun, take him out? | ||
| So again, Senator, that information stayed and stayed in local channels and did not make | ||
| it over to Secret Service. | ||
| Did they not consider that relevant? | ||
| You're saying that the local police didn't consider that relevant enough to pass along | ||
| to the Secret Service? | ||
| Sir, I think that they were in the midst of dealing with a very critical situation and | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know. I don't know. | ||
| I don't know. All right, ladies and gentlemen, so in conclusion, after now three hearings, and we're told there will be more hearings, but they won't be for a month. | ||
| Ray and the Secret Service, so the FBI and the Secret Service have both said they'll get answers back to the committees, but you never see those. | ||
| That's just lip service that they pay the people and never is anything produced. | ||
| We're more likely to get something from FOIA requests that I have filed and as well as America First Law Center has filed. | ||
| But I think the obvious issues still remain. | ||
| And it's going to lead people to assume the worst. | ||
| And how could you blame them? | ||
| That there was a standout. | ||
| And that it was political. | ||
| And maybe it wasn't just the shooter on the roof that wanted Trump dead that day. | ||
| Maybe there were others. It seems impossible that this much incompetence and this much failure could have happened. | ||
| When you look at the timeline and when you look at the questions that are yet to be answered in regards to the timeline and what allowed the shooter to roam around that day, to stand down at the post, and then getting off shots on the roof after being a known threat factor for at least 10 minutes. | ||
| No, people believe all these things lead to one thing. | ||
| It wasn't just the shooter. | ||
| That wanted Trump dead that day. | ||
| But of course, we already know that. | ||
| We already know about the deep state. | ||
| We already know about the intelligence agencies. | ||
| We already know about the corrupt establishment, Washington, D.C., that wants to get rid of Trump by any means necessary. | ||
| We know about the military industrial complex that wants to get rid of Trump by any means necessary. | ||
| And that's what we witnessed on July 3rd. | ||
| Will we ever get the answers? | ||
| Doubtfully. Which is really just proof of a cover-up. | ||
| I would say. But I don't think... | ||
| I don't suspect these committees, and I don't suspect the Republicans are going to take this laying down. | ||
| I think that... | ||
| I hope that this is a change in culture. | ||
| I have to tell you. | ||
| Because normally we get loud hearings and rambunctious question-answer sessions from this kind of modern-day Republican Party, but we see it yield little results. | ||
| Maybe they will finally demand results. | ||
| Maybe they will finally get the results that the American people are looking for. | ||
| Like, I don't know, maybe somebody should be fired? | ||
| That might be one. | ||
| Maybe criminal investigations? | ||
| Criminal negligence charges? | ||
| Subpoenas? Those would be some results that I would be looking for right now. | ||
| Let's see if the Republican Party can deliver. | ||
| All right. Now, moving on to some other things. | ||
| Remember, it's the greatest economy ever. | ||
| Here's Kamala Harris explaining the inflation of phenomenon. | ||
| I apologize if your IQ goes down in the viewing of this video in clip four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The US is experiencing record inflation, the worst in 30 years, way beyond expectations. | |
| OPEC didn't increase oil production. | ||
| Can you tell us a little bit about how you would prevent the new spending and your Build Back Better agenda from exacerbating the problem? | ||
| And also, what else are you going to do to fix this problem with inflation? | ||
| Thank you. Well, let's start with this. | ||
| Prices have gone up and Families and individuals are dealing with the realities of that bread costs more, that gas costs more. | ||
| And we have to understand what that means. | ||
| That's about the cost of living going up. | ||
| Wow. Tell me more, genius. | ||
| That's about having to stress and stretch limited resources. | ||
| That's about a source of stress for families that is not only economic, but is on a daily level, something that is a heavy weight to carry. | ||
| So it is something that we take very seriously. | ||
| But there is also a point that is important to make on the Build Back Better framework. | ||
| One, It is designed to make it less expensive for working people to live. | ||
| How's that working out? You just said it was more expensive. | ||
| It was specifically designed to bring down the costs of childcare and increase accessibility and availability. | ||
| Designed to bring down the cost of elder care. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you failed miserably. | |
| And make it available to all those working families that need that support and need that help. | ||
| And Build Back Better is not going to cost anything. | ||
| anything we're paying for it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This woman cannot be president. | |
| you She cannot be president. | ||
| She just... | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's unbelievable. | |
| I mean, Joe Biden was not a very bright person. | ||
| Joe Biden was not a very intelligent person. | ||
| I mean, this woman is scraping the bottom of the barrel when it comes to IQ. She is scraping the bottom of the barrel. | ||
| And there's all kinds of videos like this. | ||
| And again, I don't think we'd lean into insulting her intelligence or her funny laugh or her cringe dance videos, but I mean, people need to see that. | ||
| People need to see that so that when they're told, hey, you better vote for Kamala, she's not white. | ||
| Hey, you better vote for Kamala, she's not Trump. | ||
| So they see this stuff and they realize, do you really want an imbecile running the country? | ||
| Because that's what you're going to get. | ||
| So she can't run on policy. | ||
| Here's even Frank Luntz admitting nobody can even cite a policy success. | ||
| Frank Luntz admitting that. Clip 7. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Can you name a single Harris accomplishment or result from the time that she was elected vice president? | |
| Three and a half years. | ||
| Can you name just one? | ||
| 70% cannot name anything. | ||
| Can you name one? No. | ||
| Nobody knows one. She does cringe videos, but she's got trends. | ||
| She has hashtags and trends and identity politics and limp wrists that she flails around when she pretends to be smart and intellectual. | ||
| It's all an act. | ||
| It's all phonyism. She's the least genuine person in politics and maybe the least intelligent as well. | ||
| Let's see if she even makes it. | ||
| She's demanding that they virtually swear her in as the nominee tomorrow, by the way. | ||
| Let's see if she makes it. | ||
| But she's running on abortion. | ||
| That is her big issue. And of course they lie about even the abortion issue too. | ||
| She says more than one in three women of reproductive age in America now live in a state with a Trump abortion ban. | ||
| Not a Trump abortion ban. It's in the states. | ||
| So that's just an outright lie. | ||
| But notice that they go along with this political football. | ||
| Oh, they'll do something to make abortion legal. | ||
| You could have done it numerous times when Democrats were in control, as recently as Barack Obama, as recently as Joe Biden, and you didn't do it! | ||
| So they do this. | ||
| They don't want abortion to be legal. | ||
| It's like holding you politically hostage. | ||
| The same thing they do at the border. | ||
| They hold you politically hostage, and they say, all right, well... | ||
| It's like if somebody slit your throat and then said, okay... | ||
| Now, I'll stop the bleeding, and I'll give you stitches to stop the bleeding on your throat, but you're going to have to give me all your money and all your property. | ||
| It's like, you ever seen pain and gain? | ||
| That's what this is like. They kidnap you and hold you hostage with things like the open border and abortion. | ||
| It's like, hey, women, you better vote for Democrats so that you can still have abortions. | ||
| And you'll vote for Democrats if they won't make abortion legal. | ||
| They can't. They just do this so that you vote for them, and then they can't even do it. | ||
| Hey, hey, you want to stop the illegal immigrants? | ||
| You better give us $200 billion for Ukraine. | ||
| Hey, you want to stop the illegal immigrants? | ||
| You better give us money for childhood genital mutilation, okay? | ||
| Oh yeah, oh yeah, sure, yeah, 2 million people are coming across a year. | ||
| You want to stop it? You better give us something we want. | ||
| That's how these terrorist Democrats, these political terrorists, these political hostage takers, that's how they wield political power. | ||
| They slit your throat and then they say, all right, we'll stop the bleeding, but you got to give us what we want. | ||
| So here's her talking about abortion clip five. | ||
| Hey everybody, so today Iowa put in place a Trump abortion ban, which makes Iowa the 22nd state in our country to have a Trump abortion ban. | ||
| And this ban is going to take effect before many women even know they're pregnant. | ||
| And what this means is that one in three women of reproductive age in America lives in a state with a Trump abortion ban. | ||
| So what we need to do is vote, because I'm going to tell you something. | ||
| When I am president of the United States, I will sign into law the protections for reproductive freedom. | ||
| So let's get this done. | ||
| No, she won't. Because they need it as a political hostage negotiation. | ||
| They need it as a running for office platform. | ||
| If they actually made abortion legal, what would they run on? | ||
| What would the Democrats' big political issue be if they actually made abortion legal? | ||
| They wouldn't have any, folks. | ||
| They need abortion out there. | ||
| But again, notice the disingenuousness. | ||
| The Trump abortion ban. | ||
| A Trump abortion ban just went into a place in Iowa. | ||
| Trump had nothing to do with it! | ||
| Trump didn't tell the Supreme Court what to decide. | ||
| Trump isn't even in office anymore. | ||
| The people of Iowa voted against it. | ||
| Just like the people of Missouri voted against it. | ||
| Just like the people of Tennessee voted against it. | ||
| Just like the people of Texas voted against it. | ||
| I thought you guys were the party of democracy. | ||
| Trump gave it to democracy. | ||
| Trump gave the abortion issue to democracy. | ||
| As you steal nominations. | ||
| As you steal elections. | ||
| The Trump abortion ban is yet another disingenuous labeling and lie of Democrat Party propaganda. | ||
| It's all they have. | ||
| It's all they have. | ||
| And all they have is identity politics with it. | ||
| The FBI wants you to know... | ||
| It's going to be women in charge. | ||
| How does that make you feel? | ||
| Today, the legacy of the FBI's early female special agents is carried on by all the inspirational women who continue to lead counter-terrorism in cyber squads, field offices, and more. | ||
| See yourself in the FBI. Apply today. | ||
| But only if you're a woman. | ||
| We need more women. | ||
| How would you like Kamala Harris running the FBI? I didn't think that one would go. | ||
| Kamala Harris running the FBI. You think that would be alright? | ||
| I think that'd be pretty good. | ||
| She'd probably straighten things out there, wouldn't she? | ||
| Alright, what is the answer to white dudes for Harris? | ||
| Here it is. Here's the answer in clip 10. | ||
| You wanna know why I'm here to support President Trump? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because they done did black men like this for decades. | |
| Make up charges and put them, so I know Trump is innocent. | ||
| I support Trump against this corrupt, two-tiered justice system. | ||
| That's why I'm here to show my support as a black man for Trump. | ||
| And I'm wearing my shirt niggas for Trump 2024, and I mean that. | ||
| Okay, so you've got white dudes for Harris. | ||
| We've got Well, you know the thing. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright, I'm going to come back and give out the phone number. | |
| We'll be right back. | ||
| Alright, I'm going to give out the phone number. | ||
| We'll take some calls. Anything we've discussed today is fair game. | ||
| Last couple segments, squeezing a couple calls. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| Number on the screen. | ||
| Remember, folks, if you like this show, and I hope you do, we put a lot of work in here every day, myself and the great crew, please shop at infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And we got all kinds of great products for you. | ||
| Things for cardiovascular health, blood health, like Nitric Boost, Vaso B Complete. | ||
| Both 40% off right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| I cannot recommend Vitamin Mineral Fusion enough. | ||
| This stuff sells out fast. | ||
| 25% off at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Great drink mix. | ||
| Tastes even better with juice. | ||
| More than 100% daily value. | ||
| Vitamin A, Vitamin B6, Vitamin B12, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, and so much more. | ||
| Including things many people are deficient in, like boron, glycine, NAC. All in one scoop of the great tasting drink mix. | ||
| Vitamin Mineral Fusion, InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| This stuff sells out always, so get it while it lasts. | ||
| Part of the Save InfoWars mega sale at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Big victories. | ||
| I'll tell you what, Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey is really hitting the gas right before it is election season. | ||
| Listen to these victories for him. | ||
| Just this week, as the week has just started, University of Missouri bows to Republican pressure and eliminates campus diversity, equity, and inclusion division. | ||
| Units in the separate division put in place after campus protests in 2015 will be moved into other offices to reproduce political visibility and protect budget allocations. | ||
| System President Mun Choi says. | ||
| Mun Choi. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| So good job. | ||
| Now, let's all just be honest about what this is. | ||
| Diversity, equity, and inclusion stands for no white people. | ||
| Okay? That's what it means. | ||
| That's why you see in that board right there, that board meeting with Missouri System President Mun Choi, And the guy standing next to him, no whites. | ||
| You won't see any whites. | ||
| Because that's what D-I-E really means is no whites. | ||
| We don't want whites. And it's so funny. | ||
| And I saw this clip where you have this leftist talk show host talking about systemic racism and how in America it's systemic racism by whites against non-whites. | ||
| And then when the co-host says, are you sure about that? | ||
| Actually, that's not true. | ||
| And she just sits there and stares at him like he just said, you know, there's life on Mars or something. | ||
| Like he just, she just saw a ghost. | ||
| Let's just be honest. | ||
| And look, I don't make it a big thing about white identity. | ||
| I don't make it a big thing about standing up for the plight of the white man. | ||
| I don't really get into that crap. | ||
| I really don't care. | ||
| I don't like being a victim. | ||
| And so, if we're being honest though, Diversity, equity, and inclusion means anti-white. | ||
| So if there's any systemic racism in this country, it's against white people. | ||
| That's just the truth. | ||
| If you can't handle that, you might have a broken brain. | ||
| What do you think DEI is? | ||
| That is racism against whites. | ||
| Man, and they hate it when they lose these battles. | ||
| You mean I can't... | ||
| I can't discriminate against whites! | ||
| Wait, whoa, what? You want to discriminate? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, wait, no, that's not what I meant! | |
| Attorney General Bailey obtains court order blocking Joe Biden from illegally diverting funds away from building the border wall. | ||
| In other words, the Biden administration has to finish the border wall. | ||
| They have to finish the border wall. | ||
| Another victory for Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri. | ||
| He's not done! | ||
| Missouri Attorney General filing lawsuit against Biden administration for allegedly flying illegal immigrants to state. | ||
| They flew them in! | ||
| I guess the wall doesn't help when Joe Biden is flying them in! | ||
| You're going to have to build a wall. | ||
| What is the highest altitude a plane flies at? | ||
| You're going to need to build a wall thousands of feet into the air to stop Biden and Harris and the Democrats from getting their illegal migrants into the country, their illegal voters into the country. | ||
| We're going to have to build a wall 10,000 feet high to block the Democrats from importing voters. | ||
| Missouri's Attorney General Bailey suing the Biden administration for flying immigrants, illegal aliens, into the country. | ||
| How are these not high crimes and misdemeanors, at the very minimum, committed by this administration? | ||
| I mean, this is just insane. | ||
| It's just completely insane. | ||
| And then they come to the country and they murder Americans. | ||
| Illegal immigrant and vicious Times Square attack on the New York Police Department. | ||
| Cops will spend a year in jail with plea deal. | ||
| Only a year in jail. | ||
| A non-citizen, an illegal alien attacks police officers and he gets a year in jail. | ||
| If you walked through the Capitol with a flag, you got more than a year in jail. | ||
| But this guy's a non-citizen. | ||
| He's here illegally and he attacks police officers. | ||
| He'll get less than a year. | ||
| He'll get out early. Tell me this. | ||
| Why hasn't he been deported by the Manhattan District Attorney's Office? | ||
| Why haven't they turned him over to ICE and kicked his ass out of the country? | ||
| Democrats. That's why. | ||
| This is the issue we beat the Democrats with, I'm telling you. | ||
| And the blood of the Americans that have been killed by gang members and illegal aliens. | ||
| That's the story. | ||
| That's what we press them on. | ||
| Say their names. | ||
| Say the young girls' names. | ||
| Say the parents' names. | ||
| Say the kids' names that illegal aliens that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris led into this country that have murdered and raped illegal citizens. | ||
| The blood is on their hands. | ||
| So big victories for Missouri's Attorney General. | ||
| We go to Missouri now. Andy in Missouri has called in. | ||
| So we'll start with him. | ||
| Andy, you're on the air. Go ahead. | ||
| Hey, Owen. Good to talk with you again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Really proud of our Attorney General from the home state there. | |
| Figured you would be. I was wanting to call you about the... | ||
| I've heard that they're saying that they don't have communication logs and everything during the Trump attempted assassination. | ||
| And I was a radio man in the Coast Guard for several years. | ||
| And I can tell you that we had... | ||
| Back in the day, we actually had reel-to-reel tape They recorded for 24 hours. | ||
| We had digital recorders. | ||
| And we also had this one computer that actually would show the key of the unit that keyed up so we'd know which individual was actually talking to us. | ||
| And this was in the late 90s. | ||
| There's no doubt they could have had the ability to record all their communications. | ||
| They chose not to. | ||
| But that's standard operating procedure. | ||
|
unidentified
|
100%. It just raises more questions. | |
| When I was a radiuman, we would sit there and listen, and we didn't type out exactly what was said. | ||
| We made notations on this is where this started happening, and that way we could go back and check the radio logs if we ever had to go to court because some fisherman said that we didn't respond to them or anything. | ||
| So I'm not buying it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's a total... | |
| Well, I'll tell you what. We're going to get, I believe, we're going to get the local law enforcement communication logs, if not the audio. | ||
| I believe we will get that. | ||
| I filed a FOIA. We may get that as soon as next week. | ||
| I'm looking forward to hearing it, Owen. | ||
| Thanks a lot for your time. Appreciate the call. | ||
| Let's go to Jace in Texas. | ||
| Jace, you're on the air. Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, basically, I just heard yesterday you were online talking about the Open Records Act that you submitted, and I just kind of had some information about that if people maybe wanted to do it themselves as well, or just something you can do in the case that they don't respond. | |
| The Open Records Act, when it was passed, every state had to basically pass their own law in regards to that. | ||
| In Texas, for instance, it's the Public Information Act, but it's open records. | ||
| And basically, if they don't respond within 10 business days, at least saying, hey, we got your request, even though we can't get to everything. | ||
| Yeah, so the story with this is the Pennsylvania law enforcement has five days to respond. | ||
| Secret Service has 20 days to respond. | ||
| We expect to get stonewalled by Secret Service, but I think we might get some... | ||
| I think we might get some cooperation with the local law enforcement. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I really do. Being child-free threatens the patriarchy. | |
| We don't need no man. | ||
| We can do everything he can. | ||
| I'm a bold lip. | ||
| Taylor's on my side. | ||
| I'm a bold lip. | ||
| Maga starts to cry. | ||
| I'm a bold lip. | ||
| And Taylor's on my side. | ||
| I'm a bold lip. | ||
| Maga starts to cry. | ||
| Oh, man. | ||
| Yeah, we're weeping. I can't help it. | ||
| The tears are flowing. My goodness. | ||
| It's over for us, guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, you want to talk about weird. | |
| What in the hell was that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ah, that's a bold lip. | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Man. That's tough. | ||
| It's tough to recover from that. | ||
| He gets so disoriented. | ||
| Wow. Okay. | ||
| Boy, oh boy. All right. | ||
| Some crazy headlines here, and then we'll take a couple more calls. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Man. Run! | |
| Adult son of Israeli diplomat who ran over a Florida police officer gets no jail time, moves to Israel. | ||
| Say what? The adult son of an Israeli diplomat has accepted a plea deal and avoided jail time after being accused of purposely running over a Sunny Isles Beach, Florida police officer on his motorcycle. | ||
| Hmm. Must be some of that white privilege. | ||
| Oh, wait. But... | ||
| You know what? | ||
| Just gonna... Meanwhile, war is breaking out everywhere. | ||
| Israel strikes Beirut's suburb. | ||
| Massive strikes Israel in Beirut. | ||
| I mean, it's going back and forth, folks. | ||
| Israel's rampaging, and it's stoking fires of the Middle East against them. | ||
| That's why Netanyahu is here just, you know, begging for our money and our military support. | ||
| Oh, and then they strike Beirut. | ||
| And then they strike Lebanon. | ||
| I'm sure that's all just a coincidence. | ||
| It's not good. Just more death and destruction in that region. | ||
| And then Venezuela is in total chaos right now. | ||
| Venezuela's military chief backs Maduro, calls protests a coup as new unrest expected over disputed election. | ||
| Protesters clash with police over Maduro victory claim. | ||
| You know, I'm mixed on this. | ||
| Obviously, I don't support the communist regime. | ||
| I don't support communism. | ||
| I wouldn't even say I support Maduro. | ||
| I don't want to get involved in Venezuela's politics. | ||
| I don't trust Western intelligence agencies not to stage a coup or to try to overthrow, to put in their puppet Guido. | ||
| Maybe it would be better for Venezuela. | ||
| Maybe it wouldn't be. They need to deal with this. | ||
| It is ironic, though, that we would do direct engagement in Ukraine, direct engagement in the Middle East, but not in Venezuela, who's obviously much closer to us and probably much more important when it comes to oil and everything else. | ||
| By the way, it was Biden that freed up Venezuelan oil and funds and freed prisoners that supported the Maduro regime. | ||
| So it's total chaos. | ||
| It might be a stolen election. | ||
| I don't know. I'm going to have an expert dealing with Venezuela and its politics on Friday discussing all this, and so we'll get her intel with everything that went on. | ||
| But, you know, here's the lesson. | ||
| Communism fails. | ||
| Communism always results in total chaos and civil war in the streets. | ||
| And communist regimes always take the guns. | ||
| And that's the problem. You can't vote your way out of communism, and you feel like here in America, we're either one vote away from that, or we might already be there. | ||
| And that's kind of the big issue right now, isn't it? | ||
| You can't vote your way out of communism, and the people that come to take your guns, they're the bad guys. | ||
| They don't take the guns for your protection. | ||
| They take the guns for their own protection. | ||
| So what comes next in Venezuela, we shall see. | ||
| But, again, we'll have an expert on that geopolitical situation and the Middle East joining us Friday to discuss more. | ||
| Let's take a couple phone calls before we sign off for this evening. | ||
| Let's go to Sue in Michigan. | ||
| Sue, you're on the air. Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just wanted to talk about the Trust of Science is really Trust the Data operation by Big Tech, and they're basically using the UN As a crisis to get phones in everyone's hands, and they run out the CBDCs, collect all the consumer and health data worldwide, and use that to keep all the major Fortune 500 companies all in power, because they have all the data, they can make all the profits. | |
| It's predictive profits. | ||
| But the interesting thing is these CBDCs is the main thing of this, and I found out the Secret Service protects electronic financial payment systems, all the transfer systems. | ||
| So they're very important in making those CBDCs Yeah, Trump has stood against CBDCs. | ||
| He's also come out as pro-crypto. | ||
| It's at least a strong political move. | ||
| But yeah, you're right. When it comes to trust the science, it's really trust the data, the rigged data. | ||
| So they rig the data, then they call it science, and then they deceive you, and then they enslave you with it. | ||
| Sue, thank you for the call. Let's go to Sean in South Carolina. | ||
| Sean, you're on the air. Go ahead. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, what's going on, Ellen? | |
| You know, you're talking about Kamala earlier, and I mean, we know she's an absolute, complete idiot. | ||
| You know, they had to take Biden out in order for, you know, for really if they have any idea if they're going to go and deal this election, which really that's their only ploy, you know, that they had to put somebody else in, and by default you have, you know, Harris. | ||
| The question is that, are they really going to keep her there? | ||
| And they know that she really can't win, so are they going to plan some false attack where all of a sudden, you know, one strike against Trump, and all of a sudden now we're going to have some kind of assassination of the president of Kamala Harris? | ||
| And all of a sudden it's some damn, you know, dressed up in a mag hat, you know, starting, | ||
| you know, a complete, absolute chaos. | ||
| And you know how... | ||
| And look, that's why I think the goal was to... | ||
| Have Trump assassinated and probably, you know, maybe it's an Antifa member or something or they frame it that way to try to start a civil war or start more political violence. | ||
| Certainly we need the best and utmost protection of Kamala Harris and Joe Biden so that they can't have this on the other side either. | ||
| Absolutely. They want total chaos. | ||
| They'd love to see us in a Venezuela type situation with chaos on the streets and then just cancel the election. | ||
| That's certainly within the realm of possibility. | ||
| So we better hope and pray we avoid all of that with 98 days till the election. | ||
| By the way, Kamala Harris is in Atlanta, and she's about to have an event in Atlanta. | ||
| And I would just say be on the lookout for some interesting information to come out about Kamala Harris' campaign in the next few days. | ||
| And the blatant racism that they engage in against white people behind the scenes. | ||
| And let's see what kind of highlights come from Kamala Harris in Atlanta. | ||
| But obviously... | ||
| We need total safety and protection for Harris and Biden and everybody else to just try to maintain and not go into total chaos with less than 100 days of the election. | ||
| All right, let's squeeze in another here. | ||
| Ron in Florida, you're on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Hey, thanks for taking my call. | |
| A couple things. Hey, did you get my shirts I sent you with Donald Trump and Alvin Bragg? | ||
| If it smells like shit, if it looks like shit, you must acquit. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| Maybe. I don't think so, though. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, I sent them to your shipping store. | |
| I meant to put an alt note in there. | ||
| I didn't get it in there. But anyway, my question is, why hasn't anybody just flat out asked Ray or Santilli or even Jill Biden or anybody, were you involved in a coup to take out Donald Trump? | ||
| Why don't they ask those questions directly? | ||
| Well, are you talking about during these hearings? | ||
| Or are you talking about during maybe the media, if they ever get access to Biden? | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Any of it. Any of it. | |
| I don't think the media has not had access to Joe Biden since the assassination attempt. | ||
| Right? I don't think the media has had access to Biden since the assassination attempt. | ||
| There's been zero access. Or Kamala for that matter. | ||
| So it would have had to be during the hearings, Ron, I'm out of time. | ||
| I get where you're coming from. | ||
| But you know what? That's funny you bring that up. | ||
| There has been no media access. | ||
| There's been no media access to anyone, really, has there? | ||
| So, I mean, I guess they're not going to do it for decorum purposes, or they know the answer during these hearings. | ||
| All right, that's it for the InfoWars War, and we take a 21-hour break. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow. This is a make-it-or-break-it moment, so I need people to connect those synapses in their brain for you to make a decision. | ||
| If you don't support InfoWars, we will be shut down. | ||
| And people say, well, they're constantly trying to shut you down. | ||
| How are you still in the air? God. | ||
| But God works through people. | ||
| So we're in a paradox here where the judge says we're over three more months. | ||
| If we're able to get a buyer under the law, they won't be able to shut us down. | ||
| I'll just work for somebody else. And that's coming. | ||
| That's got to be set up. But in the meantime, if people believe the news that we're being shut down everywhere, which they tried to do and failed, By that foregone conclusion, we're shut down. | ||
| And under the last federal bankruptcy manager, who would not reorder product and killed all our advertising, who was positioning us to be shut down and tried to shut us down, we caught him. | ||
| The judge caught him and fired him. | ||
| We're almost sold out of all the products. | ||
| All right? But we have a lot of great products that are still in stock. | ||
| Limited supplies. So I need you to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| If we just had a donation button, maybe we should just do that. | ||
| You're fighting for freedom in a key election, battling the globalists. | ||
| We need support. But we want a long-term relationship with you. | ||
| We want to be symbiotic. | ||
| We want you to get great products you like, get them delivered to you quickly and enjoy them and have them empower you and make your life better so you love them and you keep getting them. | ||
| We want a relationship. Show. | ||
| There's the Infowars MD line that I don't talk about enough that is all the highest quality. | ||
| Whether it's turmeric, or whether it's natural sleep aid, or whether it's saw palmetto, or other compounds that are great for your prostate, also great for women's breasts. | ||
| It affects the same type of tissues that have those hormonal fluctuations. | ||
| I'm not a doctor, but I read the literature. | ||
| You need to go to InfoWarsStore.com and go to the sections that have the whole line, over a dozen products, InfoWarsMD. | ||
| We've got Ashwagandha Gummy. | ||
| Relaxes you, makes you feel really relaxed with no downer feeling. | ||
| Amazing. An incredible product. | ||
| Good night's sleep. We have a lot of great sleep aids. | ||
| This one's excellent. They're all different formulas. | ||
| People love it. Good night's sleep. | ||
| InfowarsMD. Ashwagandha with black pepper, which relaxes you and makes you lose weight. | ||
| These are all concentrates. Joint Relief Max. | ||
| Works really well. Great pain relief. | ||
| Huge bottle of it. You know, jam-packed. | ||
| It's there. Joint Relief Max. | ||
| InfoWarsMD. Prostate support. | ||
| I already mentioned that. This is just a top formula, super high quality, organic. | ||
| Nerve Renew. Amazing. | ||
| To get your nerves, not to kill pain, but to get your nerves healthy. | ||
| Nitric Boost. Vitamin Rural Fusion about to sell out. | ||
| About to sell out. Real Red Pill Plus. | ||
| And something I never talk about and should talk about more. | ||
| Probiotic Fiber. A super high-end product at a low price at InfowarStore.com. |
Export Selection