Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Friday, July 26, 2024. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room, your election headquarters with 102, I believe. | ||
| My counter is down. | ||
| I need to get my counter back up. | ||
| I'm going to say it's 102 days. | ||
| Until the presidential election. | ||
| And this is your election headquarters brought to you by InfoWordStore.com. | ||
| Now it's the last Friday of the month, and so it's the Veterans Call-In Special. | ||
| And we've got some great veteran guests coming up today. | ||
| In the second hour, we're going to be joined by Jimmy Corsetti. | ||
| And I really like the mysteries of... | ||
| Life on Earth, you might say, that Jimmy likes to get into. | ||
| So it's a bit of a different path. | ||
| It's a bit outside of the political norm, as you might say, for this transmission as your election headquarters. | ||
| But yet, very interesting topics. | ||
| He's a veteran, so we'll be getting him on. | ||
| And then, veteran Alpha Warrior is what he goes by. | ||
| He's a veteran. He's also worked in law enforcement. | ||
| Now, we had three minutes of body cam footage that was released earlier this week, and I was discussing that with him, and he was pointing out anomalies and stuff from his experience as law enforcement. | ||
| I said, well, you've got to come on my show and explain all this to my audience. | ||
| Well, now we have another 25-minute, give or take 30 seconds. | ||
| I think it's like 25, 10 or something. | ||
| About a half an hour now. | ||
| Of body cam footage from the day of the Trump assassination attempt. | ||
| And this raises even more questions. | ||
| And this building now, where they were in the second story, and that was their command post. | ||
| First of all, the building was their command post. | ||
| And now we figure that out. | ||
| And then secondly... | ||
| There were individuals that were posted up in those windows. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now we have the photo evidence of that. | |
| So it just raises the obvious question. | ||
| How is the shooter able to scale the building right in front of your command headquarters and then be in a sniping position on the roof right beneath your nose? | ||
| With the addition of him being on their radar for more than an hour and them for more than 10 minutes knowing there was somebody on the roof. | ||
| Now there's some other questions with the body cam footage that came out today that I'm really looking forward to Alpha's breakdown. | ||
| And again, like I said, with the law enforcement background and military background, When he was breaking it all down for me Monday when we talked, I was like, yeah, this guy knows what he's talking about. | ||
| So, all of that and more coming up. | ||
| Now, there are some developments in the race with Kamala Harris and Donald Trump. | ||
| And, you know, we ask this question a lot. | ||
| We don't know for sure. | ||
| We can only speculate. But it does seem the Trump campaign is taking my advice or just has the same ideas as me. | ||
| And there's really no point in debating Kamala Harris or at least committing to a debate with Kamala Harris right now. | ||
| And so they came out with a statement saying, well, actually, you know, maybe we're not so sure. | ||
| Maybe we're not so sure. | ||
| And then the propaganda... | ||
| The propaganda that they're running for Kamala is truly incredible. | ||
| Now, I'll give her credit. | ||
| Aside from the propaganda angle that they're working for her, she's upped her game a little bit. | ||
| Now, she's essentially the acting president at this point. | ||
| I mean, let's call it what it is. | ||
| So she's doing diplomatic addresses addressing the Israel situation, but she's playing both sides like a true politician now. | ||
| I mean, I don't think it's going to work, but she's giving it her best effort right now. | ||
| Big developments. | ||
| Big developments in the Harris campaign for president today. | ||
| She officially has the endorsement of Barack and Michelle Obama. | ||
| Now, everything Kamala Harris touches has the phony touch. | ||
| You heard of the Midas touch. | ||
| This is the phony touch. | ||
| I'm not sure this woman is straight up about anything. | ||
| I'm not sure this woman has ever not been a fraud. | ||
| I don't know what she's serious about. | ||
| I really don't know. There's never been a video where she's not pandering. | ||
| There's never been an instance where she's not just being a total phony. | ||
| It's the whole fake it till you make it idea, I guess. | ||
| So... They do this staged phone call. | ||
| They don't even try to make it look real, or maybe they did, and they just, again, it's the phony touch. | ||
| It's Harris's phony touch. | ||
| So maybe they tried to look at real, but it's just, when it's Harris, it's fake as three other bill. | ||
| She gets the endorsement of Barack and Michelle Obama. | ||
| Now, before you rush to any conclusions about this phone call, Remember that Barack Obama was campaigning for Joe Biden just a month ago. | ||
| Barack Obama had multiple campaign stops for Joe Biden. | ||
| Barack Obama did multiple fundraising events for Joe Biden. | ||
| He was campaigning for Joe Biden. | ||
| So, just because Obama is now behind Harris does not ensure anything. | ||
| Now, I would say it does if we're looking at odds. | ||
| Is Harris really going to be the nominee? | ||
| Well, if you're looking at odds, certainly enhances her odds, but I don't think it ensures anything. | ||
| I don't think it ensures anything at all. | ||
| Now, Harris gave a speech, and again, she's basically the acting president now, and I don't know what's going on with Joe Biden, okay? | ||
| I don't want to get into the whole breakdown of why he used to have detached earlobes and now he has attached earlobes. | ||
| In this video, he's 5'10". | ||
| Now in these new videos, he's 6'3". | ||
| Or you look at pictures of him in 2008 and then you look at pictures of him now. | ||
| I'm not going to get into that. | ||
| I'll let you know that it's out there. | ||
| It does seem Biden has grown three inches overnight. | ||
| So I don't know what that's about. | ||
| But the point is, Harris is essentially now the acting president. | ||
| And I guess Biden or the White House has decided, let's give Harris these big presidential opportunities so she can get her feet wet a little bit. | ||
| And then there's these addresses when it comes to foreign policy and diplomacy. | ||
| Let's let Harris take a shot. | ||
| And, to her credit, I mean, if she's ever seemed presidential, this is the most presidential she's ever seen. | ||
| I mean, let's just call it what it is. | ||
| She's never seemed serious. | ||
| She's never seemed presidential. | ||
| She has the phony touch. | ||
| She's the most cringe person that's ever been in a White House. | ||
| But yet, now, what she's leaning in on is the Israel-Palestine situation. | ||
| So first it was, she was going to cater to the anti-Israel leftists and not meet with Netanyahu. | ||
| I think that had something to do with Biden's health and them scrambling to have him make his dropout appearance. | ||
| So then she does meet with Netanyahu. | ||
| Then she comes out as pro-Israel and she condemns the anti-Israel protesters. | ||
| Then her husband, Doug Emhoff, does media rounds explaining how pro-Israel Kamala Harris is going to be his president and Doug Emhoff is Jewish. | ||
| They have no children, by the way. | ||
| Kamala has no children. So she's been wavering back and forth. | ||
| And then she gives an address. | ||
| Again, I can't stand Kamala Harris as much as you. | ||
| But let's just be real about the situation. | ||
| This is the most presidential she's ever presented herself. | ||
| And I guess that maybe this is the strategy now with Biden clinging to life or whatever the hell is going on with Biden. | ||
| I don't know. So with the mystery of Joe Biden, with the disappearing act of Joe Biden, Kamala is going to start to fill this presidential role, and they're going to say, okay, maybe if we start presenting her as presidential, we can remove this aura of just absolute cringe that she has. | ||
| We can remove this aura that she is the DEI vice president, which she is. | ||
| And we bought the receipts. | ||
| We brought the receipts today to explain that too. | ||
| Joe Biden said, yes, I will make sure I hire a black woman. | ||
| And he did. So she is literally the DEI vice president. | ||
| But they need to get rid of it. They need to get rid of the DEI aura. | ||
| They need to get rid of the cringe aura. | ||
| And just as another note, isn't it funny? | ||
| Democrats are always trying to have their cake and eat it too. | ||
| And their voters just, man, they eat it up. | ||
| So at the same time, they're telling you it's the most secure border ever. | ||
| The Democrats are telling you it's the most secure border ever. | ||
| Their media propaganda agents are telling you border crossings are down. | ||
| Kareem Jean-Pierre, during White House press conferences, are telling you that border crossings are lower than they were when Trump was president, is what they're saying now. | ||
| Even Joe Biden is putting out statements This morning. | ||
| This morning. | ||
| Joe Biden. Since my administration took action to secure our southern border, unlawful crossings have dropped by 55%, and they're lower than when my predecessor left office. | ||
| So, okay, obviously that's just a total and complete lie. | ||
| All right? We get it. | ||
| I mean, that is a ridiculous lie. | ||
| Yeah, I'm going to go to the sun and I'm going to go get an ice cream cone on the sun. | ||
| So, I mean, it's just the most ridiculous lie you've ever heard that less illegal immigrants, less illegal aliens are crossing the border than when Trump was president. | ||
| I mean, that's the graph that saved Trump's life, as he says. | ||
| But okay, so lowest border crossings ever. | ||
| Border is secure. | ||
| So they're telling you that the border is a success story. | ||
| The border is a success story now. | ||
| Okay? So if the border is a success story, then why don't you want Kamala Harris to own it? | ||
| Ah. If the border is such a great political success story, if the border being secure and illegal crossings being down is a declaration of victory for this administration, then why is Kamala Harris running from the border policy? | ||
| Why is the Democrat media trying to separate Kamala Harris from From the successes at the southern border. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Isn't that strange? | |
| Now look. This deal is failing miserably. | ||
| I got three guests today. | ||
| I want to take calls from veterans. | ||
| So I went light. | ||
| I mean, I've been sending the crew like 30 videos a day. | ||
| I've only got 17 today. | ||
| And I got a pretty light news desk. | ||
| So I'm not going to play the 30 minutes of clips. | ||
| But... It's even on leftist liberal shows like Piers Morgan, where they put Democrat operatives on the show that claim the border is a smashing success, and they get pushback, and they're like, how can you say that? | ||
| Look at these numbers. I mean, that's just a ludicrous claim. | ||
| And they say Kamala had nothing to do with the border, and then they just play the clips. | ||
| They just play all the clips. | ||
| The White House statements, the Biden statements, Karine Jean-Pierre's statements. | ||
| Talking about how Kamala's going to be in charge of the border. | ||
| These are on leftist shows. | ||
| These are on Democrat shows. | ||
| And it's just like... | ||
| I mean, hey, you know... | ||
| You can say that border crossings are down. | ||
| They're obviously not. | ||
| You can say Kamala Harris had nothing to do with the southern border. | ||
| You're obviously lying. | ||
| I mean, they're just... | ||
| They're caught red-handed. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's so ridiculous. But okay. | |
| Ask yourself... If the southern border under the Biden administration with Kamala Harris is such a success, then why is Kamala Harris running from southern border policy? | ||
| Why? Because they know it's a disaster. | ||
| Because they know it's a top issue heading into the 2024 election. | ||
| They know that it's been bad policy and they don't want it connected to Kamala. | ||
| So they can sit here and tell you how great the border is. | ||
| They know they're lying. | ||
| And the proof that they don't want it connected to Kamala Harris is the proof that they know they're lying. | ||
| So having said that, though, I don't know what they're going to do about this. | ||
| So first Kamala comes out. | ||
| Obviously, she was anti-Israel. | ||
| They try to cater to the anti-Israel left, which is a rather significant voting bloc. | ||
| I don't know if it changes in election, but it's not a meaningless voter block, the anti-Israel left, and we see them out in the streets. | ||
| But it's not even about the anti-Israel left. | ||
| It's that most of these protesters, they represent the new left-wing ideology. | ||
| So whether it's Black Lives Matter or whether it's pro-Palestine or any of these other groups, Code Pink, They're all connected. | ||
| They're all connected to the same ideology. | ||
| So whatever they feel about Israel, it really doesn't even matter. | ||
| That's just the flavor of the month. | ||
| It's the same group. So they really can't upset that group. | ||
| They need those votes. So Harris comes out as anti-Israel, but then, oh, well... | ||
| I guess that's bad in D.C. I guess that's bad if you want to be politically successful in D.C. So then she comes out as pro-Israel and then Emhoff does the pro-Israel tour on all the news networks. | ||
| And then she comes out and makes some scathing statements and calls for a two-state solution, which Netanyahu has just utterly rejected multiple times in recent history. | ||
| So that's right in Netanyahu's face. | ||
| So they're trying to play both sides of this issue, but it might be too late. | ||
| But here's now, I would say, I mean, this is essentially President Kamala Harris. | ||
| I mean, that's what we have here in clip five. | ||
| Half a million people facing catastrophic levels of acute food insecurity. | ||
| What has happened in Gaza over the past nine months is devastating. | ||
| The images of dead children, And desperate, hungry people fleeing for safety, sometimes displaced for the second, third, or fourth time. | ||
| We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies. | ||
| We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering. | ||
| And I will not be silent. | ||
| Thanks to the leadership of our president, Joe Biden, there's a deal on the table for a ceasefire and a hostage deal. | ||
| And it is important that we recall what the deal involves. | ||
| The first phase of the deal would bring about a full ceasefire. | ||
| All right, that's enough. | ||
| But you can see, this is President Harris. | ||
| I mean, that's what you're getting here. You're now getting President Harris. | ||
| And they can call for ceasefires and everything else. | ||
| It's really irrelevant. Israel's going to do whatever it wants, and quite frankly, I think Israel wants the hostages to remain hostages because that gives them the excuse to do everything they want to do. | ||
| And so in that vein, there are some big developments here. | ||
| UK drops plans to challenge international criminal court arrest warrant requests against Benjamin Netanyahu. | ||
| So now they're basically saying, okay, go ahead and arrest him. | ||
| Britain drops a challenge to ICC arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, overhauling their approach to the Middle East, dropping its opposition to an international arrest warrant against Netanyahu, despite pressure from Washington. | ||
| From Washington. | ||
| From Washington. | ||
| Now, it's actually getting quite ridiculous at this point. | ||
| Israel's propaganda. And it's pretty clear they want a war with Iran. | ||
| But I guess the thought process for Israel is they don't want a war with Iran unless they can get America behind it and with them in it. | ||
| And, you know, I didn't really buy much into this Iranian attempt to assassinate Trump propaganda, and I still don't, but it does add a level of intrigue now when we see how desperate Israel is for this war with Iran. | ||
| I don't even get why. | ||
| What does Israel want war with Iran for so badly? | ||
| What is it that Israel wants to get into a massive war with Iran and potentially start World War III? Why are they like that? | ||
| Why is Netanyahu like that? | ||
| What in the hell is his problem? | ||
| And it's sad that the United States Congress is so bought and paid for by AIPAC that they can't stand against this obvious, horrible foreign policy of supporting Israel no matter what. | ||
| Well, let's say Israel wants a war with Iran and that starts World War III. Should we still support Israel? | ||
| Seems pretty stupid actually. | ||
| So did Israel put out that propaganda to say, oh, see, look, Iran wants Trump dead. | ||
| And then they get the conservatives on board. | ||
| See, Iran wanted Trump dead. | ||
| And then they get Trump on board. | ||
| Maybe Israel even had something to do with it now. | ||
| And I completely discounted that. | ||
| And I would still say it's probably not. | ||
| I don't think it, I probably still would say it's not Israel. | ||
| But now it's just like, gee, Netanyahu and Israel will stop at nothing to get this war with Iran. | ||
| I mean, this is top-level war propaganda now that Israel is putting out on a daily basis to push war with Iran. | ||
| And then he goes in front of Congress and says, Iran, Iran, Iran. | ||
| Iran wants to kill you all. | ||
| Iran is the worst in the world. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You need to help Israel or Iran will attack you. | |
| Iran nuke is going to hit you. | ||
| I'm sorry, where is Iran? | ||
| Oh, that's right. It's nowhere near us. | ||
| Our problem is at our southern border. | ||
| And then you had these attacks in France, a sabotage of a high-speed rail line, which Israel comes out and says, it was Iran! | ||
| It was Iran! With no proof. | ||
| Saying, see, Iran bad. | ||
| So now anything's gone. A volcano blows up. | ||
| Iran! A bridge collapses. | ||
| It was Iran! So I'm looking into this. | ||
| Folks, the propaganda here is crazy. | ||
| Jerusalem Post. Iranian hackers threaten Israeli athletes at Paris Olympics in new cyber attack. | ||
| Israel says Iran sabotaged French Rail Network ahead of Paris Olympics. | ||
| Israel charges Iran with leaked details of Israeli Olympic team. | ||
| Israel warns France of plot by Iranian terrorist proxies to attack Israelis at Olympics. | ||
| And so it's all these stories. | ||
| They go on and on and on. Israel is warning the world about Iran. | ||
| Israel is warning France. | ||
| Israel is saying Iran's going to drop a nuke. | ||
| Israel is saying Iran wants to talk the Olympics. | ||
| They want to attack the Olympics. | ||
| Israel is saying Iran wants to kill Trump. | ||
| Israel is saying Iran wants to kill you Americans. | ||
| So I'm sorry. When I see somebody that desperate for war with Iran... | ||
| I start to think, gee, you might stage a false flag event to blame Iran, wouldn't you? | ||
| Like at the Olympics? | ||
| Or in the United States? | ||
| So this is crazy. | ||
| This is how close we are, ladies and gentlemen, to escalation in the Middle East. | ||
| And, I mean, Israel is just... | ||
| Blood lusting, warmongering, and it's not all of Israel, and that's the problem. | ||
| It's Netanyahu, and it's his loyalists, and it's his extremists that are just going all out and just blood dripping from their mouths. | ||
| And after everything they've gotten away with in the Gaza Strip, they're just like, well, nothing is going to stop us. | ||
| We might as well go all the way. | ||
| Whatever the hell that means, at this stage it means war with Iran. | ||
| So that is a very serious threat right there. | ||
| That is a very serious threat. | ||
| So now anything that happens, Israel is going to come out and blame Iran. | ||
| Because they are just dying for this war. | ||
| Now, moving on from that, Netanyahu went to visit Trump today. | ||
| Trump brought him in for a tight handshake. | ||
| As you might say, he grabbed him and yanked him in. | ||
| Kind of a power move by Trump. | ||
| But more importantly, when they were sitting down to eat, Trump said this in clip three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
When we win, it'll be very simple. | |
| It's all gonna work out and very quickly. | ||
| If we don't, we're gonna end up with major wars in the Middle East and maybe a third world war. | ||
| You are closer to a third world war right now than at any time since the second world war. | ||
| You've never been so close because we have incompetent people running our country. | ||
| Thank you very much everybody. | ||
| Now, I believe Donald Trump wants peace and prosperity. | ||
| I truly believe that. | ||
| Which is rare. It's rare in D.C. It's rare in American politics. | ||
| Hell, it might even be rare amongst world leaders. | ||
| I think Donald Trump genuinely wants peace and prosperity. | ||
| That's what he wants. | ||
| And I think that obviously when it's all said and done, the U.S. has the upper hand. | ||
| Sure, Israel owns Congress, but still they need us. | ||
| They need us with their foreign policy. | ||
| They need us for defense. | ||
| They need us for money. And Trump knows that. | ||
| And when Trump sends the nice message to the president of the state of Palestine, and then he comes out and he says that in front of Netanyahu, that's Trump signaling, hey, look, I can get along with everybody. | ||
| I'm willing to get along with everybody. | ||
| But we're not going to buy into your wars. | ||
| So, if you want our money, and if you want our support, and if you want our friendship, then stop the wars. | ||
| Period. And it's that simple. | ||
| Stop the wars. So, yeah, alright, we'll move the embassy. | ||
| We'll keep giving you all the money we give you. | ||
| We'll keep your Iron Dome going and everything else. | ||
| We'll keep the relationship. | ||
| You can stay a client, stay to the U.S., But your wars aren't going on anymore. | ||
| Your hatred and vitriol for other people in the region is not going on anymore. | ||
| We're coming to the table, we're signing the Abraham Accords, and we're stopping all these wars. | ||
| You got it? That's how it's done. | ||
| That's President Trump. Says it right in front of Netanyahu. | ||
| So yeah, I think it's probably worth it to vote in Donald Trump if it'll stop World War III. Don't you think? | ||
| Probably a good thought. | ||
| Of InfoWars, and there's a reason why, because it's really incredible how powerful it is. | ||
| And I take two every morning, I take two every night, that's because the PQQ, the CoQ10, the Elevate TP, and so much more that is in the DNA Force Plus formula, which is regarded as one of the pinnacles of InfoWars live formulations. | ||
| This powerful supplement is designed to become an indispensable part of your everyday wellness regimen, providing you with the energy and cellular support necessary for a vibrant life. | ||
| Antioxidant power. | ||
| Packed with high quality bioavailable antioxidants like PQQ and CoQ10. | ||
| Aimed at combating free radical damage and supporting cellular health. | ||
| That's right. Heart and cellular support. | ||
| With ingredients specifically chosen to support heart health and cellular energy production. | ||
| Natural and potent ingredients which include a blend of ancient and modern elements like organic reishi. | ||
| So ladies and gentlemen... | ||
| Get your DNA Force Plus at InfoWarsStore.com today. | ||
| 40% off. | ||
| And there's a reason why it's part of my supplement regimen. | ||
| Two every morning, two every night. | ||
| Really is a big difference maker when it comes to telomere support. | ||
| What are you doing for telomere support? | ||
| They don't tell you much about telomere support. | ||
| Well, you should look into it. | ||
| And then you'll want to support InfoWars and get a bottle of DNA Force Plus at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| All right. I want to put the geopolitics stuff to rest. | ||
| Guys, did you trim down our Douglas MacGregor clip in clip 12? | ||
| Because there's a little bit of a reset at the top of that, so I don't want to pitch that if we've got that kind of awkward thing. | ||
| Did you guys trim that down? Let's go ahead and hear an important message from the great Colonel Douglas MacGregor. | ||
| We'll visit Washington, D.C. this week. | ||
| He will no doubt elaborate in private on his strategy for wider war in the Middle East. | ||
| His plans should be taken seriously by every American citizen. | ||
| At this moment, the war in Gaza has already destroyed or disrupted millions of lives. | ||
| Precise numbers are hard to confirm, but hundreds of thousands of Palestinians and increasingly Israelis have been internally displaced, wounded, or killed. | ||
| These aren't just numbers. | ||
| They are shattered families and ruined lives. | ||
| And yet, there are policymakers in Washington contemplating war with Iran. | ||
| I ask you, if the human cost of the war in Gaza, a localized conflict, is this high, how much higher will the cost of a war with Iran be? | ||
| For decades, we've lurched from one costly conflict to another. | ||
| Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Ukraine. | ||
| The price? Tens of trillions and tens of thousands of American lives. | ||
| But who pays this price? | ||
| Not the policymakers or defense contractors who profit from these wars. | ||
| It's the children of farmers, truckers, nurses, and plumbers who fight, suffer, and die. | ||
| We confront the emergence of new alliances determined to stop American meddling in the affairs of other countries. | ||
| These new alliances include Iran, Russia, China, and a host of others who wait on the sidelines to join in the effort to stop Washington's reckless interventions. | ||
| Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov's recent warning that any conflict with Iran risks drawing in other major global powers must be taken seriously. | ||
| Let me be clear. No state, especially a free democratic republic like ours, should ever threaten war unless it's fully prepared to follow through. | ||
| At this point in our history, Washington knows or should know that our nation and armed forces are not ready for a war with major military powers 6,000 to 7,000 miles from the United States. | ||
| We're close to $35 trillion in debt. | ||
| This is almost 100% of our gross domestic product. | ||
| We're paying $2.4 billion in interest every day. | ||
| Everybody in Washington should have understood this a long time ago. | ||
| A war with Iran would devastate our economy. | ||
| Imagine the Straits of Hormuz, a narrow sea highway between Iran and Arab countries, closed. | ||
| Every day, one-fifth of the world's oil travels through this passage. | ||
| If war shuts it down, gas prices would skyrocket, affecting everything from your daily commute to the cost of groceries. | ||
| We're already feeling the punch from Houthi disruptions in the Red Sea. | ||
| Now, picture that problem multiplied many times over. | ||
| A full-scale war with Iran wouldn't just be an inconvenience. | ||
| It would trigger an economic crisis that would hit every American family hard, potentially leading to job losses, fortunes wiped out, and a deep recession. | ||
| And let's not forget, at the outset of every conflict, those advocating for war are always convinced it will be short and decisive. | ||
| History shows that they are nearly always wrong. | ||
| We've seen this before in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Ukraine. | ||
| Strategies fail, yet instead of reassessment, we double down on failure. | ||
| The same think tanks, pundits, and contractors push for more conflict, more spending, more sacrifice from others. | ||
| This isn't just a failure of strategy, it's a failure of accountability. | ||
| We must remember that the first priority in national military strategy is the security and preservation of the nation itself. | ||
| Any action that could put the survival of our state at risk must be avoided at all costs. | ||
| A war with Iran with its potential to escalate into a global conflict poses just such a risk. | ||
| This is where you come in. | ||
| Call your representatives. | ||
| Express your displeasure. | ||
| Remind them of the reality at home. | ||
| 70% of Americans still live paycheck to paycheck, struggling with high food and fuel prices. | ||
| To our policymakers, before pledging support for military action against Iran or any other country, Consider the welfare of your constituents. | ||
| The single mother working two jobs. | ||
| The veteran battling PTSD. The young couple postponing a family because they can't afford a home. | ||
| Are you willing to tell them their suffering is worth another war? | ||
| The self-defeating policy of open-ended military interventions with unattainable military objectives must end. | ||
| Americans must break the cycle of unaccountable decision making and recognize that America's true strength lies not in our ability to wage war, but in our capacity to build peace. | ||
| A peace that benefits the United States and the world. | ||
| Americans, your country needs you now, not to fight in foreign lands, but to fight here at home for prosperity and peace, for accountability, and for a government that puts your needs first. | ||
| Call your representatives. | ||
| Speak out in your communities. | ||
| Let the halls of power echo with the voice of Americans who believe America's needs for peace and prosperity must come first. | ||
| Thank you for listening. | ||
| And may God bless you, these United States, with the wisdom and courage to secure a peaceful and prosperous future for everyone. | ||
| Now how can anybody disagree with anything Colonel McGregor just said. | ||
| How could you disagree with any of that? | ||
| I'm calling for a Trump-McGregor alliance right now. | ||
| And really, I don't know if Colonel McGregor is interested, but he should probably be a part of Donald Trump's administration. | ||
| That would be very big and important. | ||
| I would say. And look, apparently, you know, maybe Trump's team took my advice on the Kamala Harris debate. | ||
| They released this statement. Given the continued political chaos surrounding crooked Joe Biden and the Democrat Party, general election debate details cannot be finalized until the Democrats formally decide on their nominee. | ||
| There is a strong sense by many in the Democrat Party, namely Barack Hussein Obama, that Kamala Harris is a Marxist fraud who cannot beat President Trump, and they are still holding out for someone better. | ||
| Therefore, it would be inappropriate to schedule things with Harris because Democrats very well could still change their minds. | ||
| So, hey, look, if anybody out there from the Trump campaign is hearing me, get McGregor on board. | ||
| All right, we got some breaking news here. | ||
| I guess this is some footage from the opening Olympic ceremonies earlier today. | ||
| Well, I'll get to that. | ||
| But Donald Trump has announced he's going to be going back to Butler, Pennsylvania to have a rally. | ||
| Donald Trump has announced Butler, Pennsylvania rally. | ||
| So that's all we know right now. | ||
| We don't know the location or time, but he has announced he will be going back to complete his rally. | ||
| That's epic. So Trump announces Butler, Pennsylvania rally honoring the soul of our beloved firefighting hero, Corey, and those brave patriots injured two weeks ago. | ||
| Luckily, the two others that were injured have been released from the hospital now. | ||
| What a day it will be. | ||
| Fight, fight, fight. Stay tuned for details. | ||
| How about that? Right in their face. | ||
| Right in their face. All right, now quickly on the Olympics, this is just crazy. | ||
| And there always seems to be some weird secret society propaganda going on at these ceremonies. | ||
| We remember right before COVID, I think it was in London, they did all the kids wearing masks and on hospital beds and then like a robot of death above them. | ||
| Like, oh, you're warning us you're going to launch a virus and kill everybody and put us in masks? | ||
| What's that about? And so they start the Olympic ceremonies, and I'm like, oh, this is kind of cool. | ||
| They had one of the world's great metal bands, Gojira. | ||
| You hear them frequently on the music on this show, and I'm like, oh, wow. | ||
| Wow, maybe they're going to do something cool, and you're going to have good music and stuff. | ||
| And then they just went completely, I don't know what you, I mean, it's just straight satanic. | ||
| And I don't really care about the fire, whatever. | ||
| I like fire. I like pyrotechnics. | ||
| You know, even the beheading was like, okay, that's kind of French culture. | ||
| I mean, they did have a French Revolution. | ||
| They beheaded people. So even with that, I was like, okay, whatever. | ||
| So pyrotechnics, French people beheading people. | ||
| Cool metal band. Alright, not bad. | ||
| And then everything after that was tranny, tranny, tranny, gay, gay, gay, and blaspheming Christianity and Jesus Christ. | ||
| I mean, mocking the Last Supper with a bunch of trans individuals. | ||
| And then having trans dance routines with bearded men in dresses and they, I don't know if it's raining there or if they're spraying them with that so that it's like, I mean, I don't know. | ||
| So this is what you get. | ||
| You get the Tranny Express. | ||
| So they start off and I'm like, oh, cool, a metal band that I like. | ||
| And all right, that's kind of cool. | ||
| They got some pyrotechnics, the beheaded lady. | ||
| Okay, that's kind of French culture. | ||
| They like the French leftists beheading people. | ||
| And then it just goes full, oh, we're just actually here to just sexualize trannies and blaspheme Jesus Christ and do a tranny Last Supper. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, why do they have to do this? | |
| Why do they have to do this? | ||
| Can't we just be normal? | ||
| Can't we just have the Olympics and just celebrate individual greatness? | ||
| Can't we just come together for the Olympics and just celebrate our differences and friendly competition and just go through the tradition? | ||
| Can we just not ruin everything with you shoving transgender gay agendas in our face? | ||
| Can we just not ruin everything with you having to blaspheme Christianity in our face? | ||
| Like, can you just do a normal performance and then open up the Olympics and then we can all have a good time? | ||
| You just have to step on everything. | ||
| You just have to spit on everything. | ||
| I like the Olympics. I was kind of excited. | ||
| Get home at night, pop on the Olympics before you go to bed, watch a couple things. | ||
| The U.S. usually does pretty well. | ||
| It can be a patriotic moment. | ||
| And then they just do something. They just spit in your eye. | ||
| It's like, jeez, man. | ||
| Like, how do I watch now? | ||
| You just spit in my eye and then you put a dude in a dress gyrating his balls in my face. | ||
| Thanks a lot. Yeah, I'm really excited for the Olympics now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
God. All right. | |
| So there you go. The Olympics have started, guys. | ||
| Jeez. The level of propaganda for Kamala Harris is crazy. | ||
| Here, this is Barack and Michelle Obama officially endorsing Kamala Harris in a cringe video routine. | ||
| Guys, let's just cut it with the Olympics. | ||
| I just can't deal with it. I mean, the symbolism and propaganda is insane. | ||
| I don't want to see a gay tranny's balls in a leotard in a wet t-shirt contest, okay? | ||
| I just want to watch the Olympics and maybe a cool opening ceremony that's family-friendly. | ||
| It'd be nice. But no, you just can't do it. | ||
| You left us just... You just can't do it, can you? | ||
| You just can't... We just can't have anything. | ||
| We can't have anything for normal people. | ||
| We can't have anything that's family-friendly. | ||
| We get it. You hate families. | ||
| You hate normal people. You want to just take a fat dump on everything that's traditional and historical and supposed to be for everybody. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You just can't do it, can you? | |
| Got it. Thanks for the not-so-subtle reminder. | ||
| Here is the official endorsement from Barack and Michelle Obama of Kamala Harris. | ||
| So this is the second presidential candidate that the Obamas have endorsed. | ||
| Maybe it'll stay at two. Maybe it'll be three. | ||
| Could be four when it's all said and done. | ||
| Look at how phony. | ||
| Look at how forced this is in clip six. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Kamala! Hello. Hi. | |
| Hey there. Aw, hi, you're both together. | ||
| Oh, it's good to hear you both. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't have this phone call without saying to my girl Kamala, I am proud of you. | |
| This is going to be historic. | ||
| We called to say Michelle and I couldn't be prouder to endorse you and to do everything we can to get you through this election and into the Oval Office. | ||
| Michelle, Brock, this means so much to me. | ||
| I am looking forward to doing this with the two of you, Doug and I both, and getting out there, being on the road. | ||
| But most of all, I just want to tell you that the words you have spoken and the friendship that you have given over all these years mean more than I can express. | ||
| So thank you both. It means so much. | ||
| And we're going to have some fun with this too, aren't we? | ||
| Oh yeah, I'm sure. Of course, because it's all fun and games. | ||
| You know, stepping on the American people and watching them starve and go broke is fun for you and Barack. | ||
| You know, there's a turd in the punch bowl. | ||
| There's a turd in the punch bowl, folks, and it's Doug Emhoff. | ||
| Barack's gay, Michelle's a dude, Kamala's not white, and then Emhoff is in there, a white man or a Jewish man. | ||
| Either way, that doesn't jive with left-wing politics, so... | ||
| I think Kamala's only move at this point is to divorce Doug Emhoff and bring in Jussie Smollett. | ||
| What do you guys think? | ||
| Is there anybody else that could replace Emhoff? | ||
| There's a turd in the punch bowl. | ||
| It just doesn't fit. | ||
| If you have Michelle and Barack and Kamala in the room, you can't have Emhoff. | ||
| That's a turd in the punch bowl. | ||
| She's got to divorce him and maybe go with Smollett. | ||
| I'm thinking it's Smollett. | ||
| Or maybe, you know, Karine Jean-Pierre is single now. | ||
| Maybe she changes teams. | ||
| First Lady Karine Jean-Pierre. | ||
| Got the Olympics going on right now. | ||
| It's a French name. That might be the move. | ||
| Juicy Smollet is kind of French too. | ||
| So I don't know. I mean, either way, they're both gay. | ||
| Or maybe they could do some sort of a Polyamorous relationship. | ||
| Maybe have them both in there. | ||
| Or maybe like put Emhoff in like a gimp mask or like, you know, like dominatrix him or something. | ||
| Because this is, it just doesn't fit with Emhoff, a white man being in there like that. | ||
| He has to be either humiliated or erased from the picture. | ||
| Otherwise, I don't think Kamala makes it. | ||
| All right. And so this is going on. | ||
| You have all these leftists that are saying, Kamala never bailed out anybody with the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| And then they're tweeting all over the internet this, except she literally did tweet it out. | ||
| And so the Community Notes links the tweet in every statement that claims she never supported the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| They literally link her tweet that promoted the Freedom Fund. | ||
| They link it right there every time saying, you're lying, here's the tweet. | ||
| Quote from Kamala Harris, if you're able to, chip in now to the Minnesota Freedom Fund to help post bail for those protesting on the ground in Minnesota. | ||
| You know, when they burnt it to the ground. | ||
| It's a protest. Is there anything more cringe than an Indian American telling you that she's so into black culture like this in clip 7? | ||
| All right, Marlon, so I know how to make a mean pot of greens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In fact, people used to ask me to make greens for them for Christmas. | |
| One year, I had so many that I had to wash, and he ended up washing them in the bathtub. | ||
| He's washing collard greens in the bathtub. | ||
| Oh, hell. | ||
| It's like Hillary Clinton whips out a bottle of hot sauce. | ||
| He's like, don't you blacks like hot sauce? | ||
| Look, I got hot sauce. | ||
| Don't blacks like hot sauce? | ||
| They're like, what the hell? Kamala Harris, I make collard greens in the bathtub. | ||
| Vote for me if you're black. Ha, ha. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I used to believe everything I'd see on the news, but that's before I discovered a brain. | |
| A brain is meant for everyday use. | ||
| Those living with moderate to severe stupidity have seen immediate improvement in common sense with a brain. | ||
| I thought the government had my best interests at heart. | ||
| And then a friend told me about a brain. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Talk to your doctor about what news sources you obey. | |
| A brain may also lower your desire to take life-altering advice from celebrities. | ||
| Getting lectured about my carbon footprint from people with three private jets used to make sense. | ||
| But thanks to a brain, now I can think for myself every day. | ||
| When my disregard for third grade biology began to flare up, I knew it was time for a brain. | ||
| Do not try a brain if you're allergic to a brain. | ||
| Common side effects may include accountability, discernment, homeschooling your kids, a better understanding of economics, awareness of the stupidity of socialism, and diarrhea. | ||
| For tethering yourself to reality, the only no-brainer is choosing a brain. | ||
| Ask your doctor if a brain is right for you. | ||
| For more information, visit tryabrain.com. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, recommend a brain. | ||
| To your Democrat friends, ask them if they've heard about a brain and that they need a brain and maybe we can help them out. | ||
| Seems to be what they're lacking. | ||
| By the way, Dane Cook, a really popular comedian, a decade or two ago, I'm sure he's still pretty popular and successful, but I mean he was like the number one comedian for a couple years, about 20 or so years ago. | ||
| And he put up a video, and it's very... | ||
| I want to play the video because you can see there's no angle to this. | ||
| There's no emotion. He's just asking people, hey, what do you guys think about politics right now? | ||
| And we'll play the video and then get to the responses. | ||
| Here it is, clip 13. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I got a serious question. | |
| I'm going to get serious. So, I'm just curious. | ||
| I didn't want to hear it from some kind of media outlet. | ||
| I didn't want to hear it from... | ||
| Some random internet source. | ||
| I just want to get like a vibe from people on here. | ||
| Politically, where are you at? | ||
| I mean, you don't have to say like what your vote is full out, but like, I just want to understand like where the country is right now after, you know, just the last two weeks has been pretty gnarly in terms of just Everything and anything political. | ||
| And so, just out of my own curiosity, in the comments section, where are you leaning? | ||
| What's the vibe? | ||
| It's not even a poll. | ||
| I just want to, like, just get a general sense. | ||
| Well, speaking of polls, we can get to that in a second. | ||
| But folks, you go into the comments, and this is all you see. | ||
| Was blue, but learned to fact check, and now red. | ||
| I've seen so many Leaving the Left videos. | ||
| I was a Democrat, not anymore. | ||
| Voted left my whole life, and now I have to vote right for my children. | ||
| It just goes on and on like this. | ||
| I lean left but going with Don on this one. | ||
| And then had you ever heard this? | ||
| Don Van Gogh. | ||
| Don Van Gogh with the ear. | ||
| I'd never heard of Don Van Gogh until I started reading. | ||
| Don Van Gogh. | ||
| We should maybe put up a famous Van Gogh and then like do AI like Trump rendition of a Van Gogh or something. | ||
| So anyway, it just goes on and on and on. | ||
| And it's mostly people that say they're liberal or vote Democrat or lean left and they're all voting for Donald Trump. | ||
| I mean, look at this one. Used to be extreme left. | ||
| Now I'm far right. It just goes on and on. | ||
| I was raised Democrat. | ||
| Now I'm voting Republican. | ||
| Every single one of the comments. | ||
| And getting back to the polls, folks, they're trying so hard to get Trump to lose a poll. | ||
| Oh, there it is. Wow. | ||
| Nicely done. There's Trump Van Gogh. | ||
| Or Don Van Gogh. | ||
| They're trying so hard to get Trump to lose a poll, and every single poll that they put up on Twitter, or X rather, is Trump is getting minimum 70%, maximum 80%. | ||
| Doesn't matter who's putting it up, doesn't matter the source, anything. | ||
| So they try to read, the Krasensteins are just losing, they're losing their minds. | ||
| So now they're putting up polls that say, do you want a rapist, or do you want a lawyer for president? | ||
| And then the rapist wins. So they can't even frame it to get Trump to lose. | ||
| It's a nice effort, Liberals. | ||
| Alright, my first veteran guest for today is Jimmy Corsetti. | ||
| And I recently saw him on with the Hodge Twins, and it was just such an awesome interview. | ||
| And he just has so many unique perspectives that I was like, man, I got to get this guy on. | ||
| I want to talk to this guy about some of the stuff and the research that he does. | ||
| And Jimmy, really what sparked my imagination with you was getting into kind of the hidden anthropology aspects We're good to go. | ||
| I mean, where do you see us at right now in America politically? | ||
| I mean, I know you heard some of my first five minutes there for this hour. | ||
| So, I mean, where do you see things going? | ||
| Democrats are desperate. Now they're trying Kamala. | ||
| The deep state tries to put a bullet through Trump's head. | ||
| How do you find ground right now in these epic political times? | ||
| I have to tell you, what I think we're witnessing is history repeating itself. | ||
| And if there's something I've learned while studying history and the ancients is that this seems to be a cycle of rinse, cycle, repeat, so to speak, that throughout history, tyrants move in, will stop at nothing to gain power and destroy everyone along with it. | ||
| And it's happening all over again. | ||
| These people are trying to Take over the world. | ||
| And they're all in. | ||
| And the hour is late. | ||
| And I couldn't be more concerned about the future of the United States. | ||
| I will say that the future looks quite bleak. | ||
| However, good triumphs over evil. | ||
| And I think that the future is uncertain. | ||
| And it's not too late. | ||
| I do believe that things will get much worse before they get better. | ||
| But we're in for a fight. | ||
| And history is the case in point. | ||
| It seems to go this way. Well, you've got a really incredible channel, Bright Insight. | ||
| For folks, if you want to look at some of the untaught ancient history, you won't learn this stuff in the history textbooks. | ||
| I think that's by design. | ||
| They'd rather lie to you about evolution than tell you the truth about ancient history, and maybe we can get into that in a second. | ||
| But leaning in on that... | ||
| Do you think things move faster now when we deal with major turning of events like we're going through right now? | ||
| Do you think things are moving faster now than they would normally? | ||
| Because I tell my friends that ask me like, oh, what's going to happen? | ||
| Everything's so crazy. And I just say, look, I can't tell you for sure what's going to happen. | ||
| Tune into the show if you want to know. | ||
| But I'm like, look, the next 100 days are going to be just completely crazy. | ||
| The next 100 days until the election, 102, are going to be insane. | ||
| And then the 70-so-odd days from election to inauguration are going to be insane. | ||
| So that's all I pretty much can guarantee people when they ask me, well, what do you think is going to happen, really? | ||
| Yeah, things are moving faster than ever. | ||
| It's because their lies are being exposed at a speed of light rate because of our technology. | ||
| Here we are blasting out the truth on Twitter and they can't keep up. | ||
| And I agree with you. Things are going to get unbelievably crazy over the next hundred days. | ||
| Here's my big prediction. | ||
| Kamala Harris is not going to be the nominee, and if she is, something will happen between the DNC nomination at the end of or latter part of August and the election day. | ||
| She's not the one. They know she can't win. | ||
| They're going to steal it. | ||
| They stole 2020, so they have to steal it again. | ||
| They're all in. If they don't keep stealing it, they'll get caught. | ||
| And best case scenario, they'll spend the rest of their lives in prison. | ||
| So I think we're going to witness a curveball. | ||
| I don't know what it is. COVID in 2020 was the curveball. | ||
| People weren't really expecting that. | ||
| There was talks of a pandemic and all that, but like nothing to that extent. | ||
| And that was their artifice to steal a 2020 election through mail-in voting and the machines and everything else. | ||
| So I think that there's going to be something that comes out of left field that we're not expecting. | ||
| It might go beyond World War III. It could be a grid-down scenario. | ||
| Use your imagination, but I'm telling you, something's coming. | ||
| This is not going to play out. | ||
| And they know she can't win. | ||
| When the election comes and Donald Trump doesn't win, everyone will be convinced it was stolen. | ||
| So they need to bring out something in the last second. | ||
| I'm convinced of it. Yeah, I agree. | ||
| And I think that, you know, that's kind of the wild card, too, is... | ||
| We think, okay, a million people on January 6th in D.C., that was like Trump's top supporters. | ||
| Those were people that really follow politics with a microscope every day that were like, this thing was so obviously stolen, I've got to do something. | ||
| I've got to go to D.C. and call for the process to have this thing reviewed, the legal lawful process, to have this thing reviewed, and then the rest is history, as they say. | ||
| But I think that should they steal it from Trump again, I don't think it's going to be a million people in D.C. I don't know what it's going to be, but I think it's going to be 10 million plus people that are going to be like that, like saying, okay, this was a steal job. | ||
| Now, I don't know what that looks like as far as what people do in that response mechanism, but it's going to be 10 million plus that are like, no, this election was fake. | ||
| But then on the other hand of that, and this kind of goes back to what you're saying, is Maybe they already have made that measurement, or maybe Republicans have made the right adjustments to make sure they can't steal it. | ||
| So now you're getting into that, okay, here's all the cards they can play, and are they going to play them all in the next 100 days to try to get rid of Trump? | ||
| They already tried to put a bullet through his head. | ||
| So, I mean, all bets are off here as what cards they're going to play, I think, moving forward. | ||
| And you just highlighted some of them. | ||
| But I tell you what, I'm so curious. | ||
| Your channel is, if you want a break from politics, folks, but you still want that kind of itch in your head scratched of just interesting information that provokes thought, I would go follow Jimmy and his Rumble and YouTube channels. | ||
| What was it for you that made you interested in ancient human history? | ||
| Was there a certain megalith or was there a... | ||
| I mean, what was it for you that you were like, huh, wait a second, we're not being | ||
| told the truth about ancient human civilization. | ||
| I want to dig more into this. | ||
| And then ultimately now you're one of the leading content creators with that subject | ||
| material. | ||
| It's an interesting question. | ||
| I've always had an interest in the ancient since I was a kid. | ||
| I remember reading the Goosebump books where they were talking about the mysteries of the pyramids. | ||
| And then in 2015, I had gone back to school and I had a knee surgery and I was basically bed and couch ridden and I got real depressed and was unhappy with my decision to go get a master's degree. | ||
| And I basically just started going down the rabbit hole of looking into the Egyptians. | ||
| I saw Joe Rogan showing up on my feed with Graham Hancock and other people. | ||
| And I came across this channel, his name is Brian Forster, where he was discussing these 100-ton stone granite boxes that are called the Serapium in Saqqara, Egypt. | ||
| And he was describing on how we were taught that the Egyptians had to use bronze chisels and stone hammers and bronze saws To cut stone, but it doesn't make sense because of the Mohs scale of hardness that those tools could not effectively cut granite. | ||
| So I'm like, well, that's interesting. | ||
| Let me go down this rabbit hole and see for myself. | ||
| And sure enough, I did some fact checking and saw, oh my goodness, the mystery is real. | ||
| We have absolutely no explanation for how they constructed the pyramids. | ||
| The Egyptians left us with no explanation for how they moved stones that weigh upwards of a thousand metric tons. | ||
| For example, There's a statue called the Ramiseum in Luxor, Egypt. | ||
| It weighed 1000 metric tons before it was inexplicably destroyed, which is a whole other rabbit hole to go down. | ||
| But 1000 metric tons is 2.2 million pounds, and this stone was inexplicably transported approximately 170 miles. | ||
| The sheer physics behind that goes way beyond anything we've done in modern times. | ||
| I'll give you a quick example. | ||
| In 2012, the Los Angeles County Museum of Art moved a 340-ton stone just over 100 miles. | ||
| It took a year of planning. | ||
| They had to custom build a 260-foot-long trailer truck that was made up of 198 semi-truck wheels, had 44 axles, and it moved at like four miles an hour. | ||
| That was known as being the largest project of its kind since the Egyptians built the pyramid. | ||
| So I look at those details and I'm like, wait a second. | ||
| So you're saying that the Egyptians somehow moved a stone that was three times heavier than that stone? | ||
| And they did it with primitive methods? | ||
| It doesn't make sense. | ||
| And I'll just wrap up my soapbox real quick because I'll keep talking. | ||
| But to anyone that's not familiar with the mysteries of the ancients, I'm inclined to think that you're starting to hear more and more about it, whether it's the Joe Rogans of the world, the Graham Hancocks. | ||
| Even Tucker Carlson has alluded to the mysteries of the Egyptians. | ||
| And the reason why the interest is growing is because People that are looking into these details as an adult, as opposed to being taught about it when we were 11 years old in like the sixth grade or whatever, you realize that, oh my goodness, we truly have no idea about the most magnificent aspects of our ancient past. | ||
| That there truly is a missing chapter of human history and that in itself raises questions because it seems that Human civilization right now is going down a very, very dark path that despite how technologically advanced we are, we're as dumb as ever, we're as separated and divisive as ever, and it seems like we're heading down a path to destroy ourselves once again. | ||
| Well, and my theory is the reason why they want to erase ancient human civilization is so they can teach the lie of evolution so that humans don't think that they are a special creation. | ||
| I would say, to put it as simply as possible, they want to get rid of the idea of divine creation I mean, it's pretty obvious. | ||
| Anybody can sit here and observe, wow, look, humans make rocket ships. | ||
| No other species on Earth builds a rocket ship. | ||
| I mean, that's just one obvious example. | ||
| And so they're like, huh, there's something different about us. | ||
| And so, no, here comes the propaganda. | ||
| No, you're not different. You just evolved from a monkey turd. | ||
| There's nothing special about you. | ||
| You're not different and so I think that's why they want to remove the the truth about ancient history and then and | ||
| then give you this lie about | ||
| Evolution now, what do you think because one what I I'm not as deeply embedded to this as you I'm kind of just a casual | ||
| Observer like I'm the kind of guy that would go to your channel and and be interested in the stuff you're covering | ||
| But one of the things that seems to stick out to me is certain patterns where it seems like there is a civilizational | ||
| Reset maybe like every 10,000 years or something like that It seems like there is a civilizational reset, whether that's humans doing it to ourselves or maybe there is some sort of a catastrophic event that just... | ||
| What kind of conclusions have you reached based off of your research and the timeline of all these different megaliths and ancient digs of a pattern as far as civilizational resets? | ||
| Well, it's a scientific fact that the Earth goes through periods of cataclysmic events, such as pole shifts, and we're currently underway for a pole shift. | ||
| You had interviewed, I believe you and I know Alex Jones had, back with that solar flare that happened about a month and a half ago, Ben Davison of the Suspicious Observers YouTube channel, he's Sun Space Weather News on Twitter, and he's covering this more than anybody. | ||
| But it is a scientific fact that the poles shift And approximately 12 to 13,000 years ago, there was a geomagnetic pole excursion that caused profound weather changes throughout the world. | ||
| It reset the Gulf Stream. | ||
| It caused a deep freeze and then a rapid heating, which was the end of the last ice age, which in itself is a mystery. | ||
| And if you look at the fact that they're updating runway numbers throughout the world, which are aligned to the compass, for example, if you land on Runway 1-2 left, it's because you're facing 120 degrees on the compass. | ||
| Well, over the last several years, they've been updating these numbers throughout the world because the poles are shifting at a rapid pace. | ||
| It's been happening over the last several decades, and it's now accelerating. | ||
| And let me just clarify, because not everyone, mainstream science will say that's not what's happening here. | ||
| Here is what is a known scientific fact, which is that the Earth has what's called glacials and interglacial periods, which in over the last 450,000 years, we've had five interglacial periods, which means periods of warming. | ||
| And these periods of warming last Several to tens of thousands of years. | ||
| And in between them are periods of cooling, which are called glacial periods because the glaciers now grow and cover the continents. | ||
| And those periods last 70 to 90,000 years. | ||
| I should say that Elon Musk had alluded to this about a year and a half ago on the Full Send podcast. | ||
| Where he was talking about how ice ages are a deep, deep rabbit hole. | ||
| And basically what I'm trying to tell you is that hole shifts are what is the missing link and what causes cataclysms on Earth, including the ice ages. | ||
| And it's the reason why we know so little about our ancient past. | ||
| It is a scientific fact that humans, as far as our modern cranial capacity, dates back over 300,000 years. | ||
| And yet we're supposed to believe that we only started doing or created a civilization 6,000 years ago with the Sumerians. | ||
| That's just not the case. | ||
| There's ancient sites such as Göbekli Tepe in Turkey that date back almost 12,000 years ago, which if you want to go down a rabbit hole, look into the World Economic Forum, how they're infiltrating archaeological digs around the world and are preventing excavation. | ||
| I made a few videos on that recently. | ||
| Oh, I do want to get into that. | ||
| That's a wild one. | ||
| And this is something people could look into, but it all ties back to the religious aspect. | ||
| Why are they trying to cancel Christianity? | ||
| I agree with you entirely that it's like they don't want people to believe in God. | ||
| They want everyone to believe in science. | ||
| And what's interesting is that science has become a religion and that you have so many leading scientists who are atheists. | ||
| But the characteristic of humans is that we've got to believe in something. | ||
| It's the way we're designed. So people who don't believe in God believe in science. | ||
| But it seems to me that the religious texts from around the world do speak of cataclysmic events. | ||
| For example, the Great Flood out of the Bible. | ||
| A lot of people aren't aware that that flood story is found on five continents around the world from hundreds of different cultures and religious texts. | ||
| Clearly, there must be some truth to that. | ||
| So tying back in to what I was just saying about the events of 11,000 to 12,000 years ago, which is that there was a rapid rise of sea levels of more than 400 feet in a relatively short period of time. | ||
| So if you take it to the fact that ancient humans were known to live on the coast, I mean, almost half the world's population lives on or near a coast today because of the abundance of resources and travel and all that. | ||
| And it's not hard to put together the dots, which is that that's what they're talking about. | ||
| The flood didn't have to cover the Peruvian Andes and the Himalayans. | ||
| But if it was a worldwide event that was 400 foot rise in sea levels, that would have obliterated civilizations around the world. | ||
| And I think it all ties together. | ||
| Well, I want to get into the excavation, and then I'll ask you a question on something specific if we have time for it. | ||
| But, yeah, your most recent coverage was about they want to not excavate, what is this, a potential new pyramid discovery. | ||
| But I think it's important, too... | ||
| To explain how important these excavation sites are, and correct me if I'm wrong, but it was excavations that led to us discovering Easter Island. | ||
| It was excavations that led to us discovering the pyramids in Mexico and in South America. | ||
| Where before they did the excavation, I mean, folks, it's just like a giant forest. | ||
| I mean, like, it just looks like a normal forest, and then they come in and dig it all up, and it's like, oh my gosh, this is a megalith, been here tens of thousands of years. | ||
| So talk about this new discovery and why they won't excavate it so that we can see this incredible piece of ancient history. | ||
| This is wild. So there are two sites. | ||
| One is called Gobekli Tepe in Turkey. | ||
| It dates back 11,600 years ago. | ||
| And in 2016, there was a partnership announced with the Dosis Group, which is a conglomerate of businesses that is a billion dollar industry. | ||
| And the CEO is a longtime member of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| And since they took control in 2018, excavations had been at a near standstill. | ||
| Yes, there are archaeologists conducting work there today. | ||
| However, there are hundreds of pillars that are still under the ground, and they have stated that they are going to save that excavation for, quote, future generations, and went on to say that it may be 150 years before they dig it up, which makes absolutely no feasible sense of any kind because it is literally... | ||
| This site is 50 times larger than Stonehenge and almost 7,000 years older. | ||
| You would think you'd want to dig that up. | ||
| So the other site, the pyramid, which you just mentioned, is a site in Indonesia called Ganang Padang, and it may be as old as 27,000 years. | ||
| It is a hilltop formation that was geoengineered into a series of five terraces, so kind of like a pyramidal-type structure. | ||
| It's not really a pyramid, but call it a pyramidal-like structure. | ||
| And the ground-penetrating radar, scientific measurement, has identified a tunnel and cavity that's underneath the ruins there. | ||
| So the question becomes, okay, when are we going to go dig this up? | ||
| Well, it turns out that the Ministry of Culture, Education, Research and Technology in Indonesia It is assigned by the president of Indonesia, and the minister of that entire department is a global shaper of the World Economic Forum. | ||
| His name is Nadia Makaram. | ||
| And they went from 2014 saying that they were willing to allocate, the Indonesian government, I should say, was willing to allocate unlimited funding and resources to dig this up. | ||
| And then in 2018, this World Economic Forum Global Shaper takes control and all of a sudden, the funding is just evaporated, gone. | ||
| They're not digging it up. | ||
| So just to clarify for the audience, two of what may be the oldest ancient sites on Earth that stand to completely rewrite our history and debunk the textbooks Are at an indefinite standstill as of today, which raises unbelievable questions, which is, why is the World Economic Forum even remotely associated with these sites? | ||
| And let me just say one last thing, because I get a lot of pushback and the skeptics and everything will say, well, the World Economic Forum doesn't control these sites. | ||
| And I'm like, wait a second. The World Economic Forum is nothing in itself. | ||
| It's nothing but a bunch of members that have infiltrated cabinets around the world, corporations, the media, and they're the ones that have the power. | ||
| So it's the people. The decision-making people, the people that make the decision-making powers at these sites are members of the World Economic Forum, and they are the ones that are choosing not to excavate. | ||
| The connection is there. | ||
| It's disturbing, and I'm not sure what to make of it, other than that they're trying to suppress our ancient past. | ||
| Well, here's what's amazing, too. | ||
| It's like... You know, my show is obviously politics, and I kind of remove the curtain on political developments and controls and the shadow hands and influences and everything like that. | ||
| But, I mean, really, if this is one hand of the corrupt body that tries to control planet Earth, this is the other hand, is what you're talking about. | ||
| And it's less talked about because it's less in your face. | ||
| I mean, the Catholic Church will do the same thing. | ||
| They'll find these historical archaeological sites... | ||
| And then the Catholic Church will just put a church and say, oh, no, no, no, it's ours now. | ||
| And then the Vatican comes in and steals all the things that get found under the site. | ||
| And I'm getting off base here, but it's like, it really is incredible how there's this whole wing, I don't even know, I guess you would call it the anthropological... | ||
| Secret societies that stop us from knowing ancient history. | ||
| So it's like, yeah, I focus on politics, but the stuff that you're covering, I'm telling you, folks, it's just as curious and there's just as much corruption and control over the human mind and consciousness when it comes to them hiding our history. | ||
| Now, there's all kinds of sites I'm sure that you could talk about with this, but I'm just curious because there's been a theory that's been going around. | ||
| Is there an ancient structure or a pyramid or a sphinx even in the Grand Canyon? | ||
| That's debatable. To my knowledge, no, it's nothing more than conspiracy, which I use the word conspiracy. | ||
| I'm a conspiracy theorist. I need to see it to believe it. | ||
| But it is interesting to mention that all the monuments of the Grand Canyon are named after Egyptian gods and relics there. | ||
| And there has been legends going back more than 100 years that state that there was Egyptian artifacts found there, that there was tunnels with hieroglyphs that were Egyptian. | ||
| But that being said, I need to see it to believe it. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? It's possible, but there are other mysteries that are very profound. | ||
| And I will mention this really quick because we're talking about the powers of the world. | ||
| People should be aware that the most powerful people on Earth are interested in the ancients. | ||
| For example, the black market of Egyptian antiquities is a like four or five billion dollar a year industry, which raises questions because it's like clearly these billionaires are buying up Relics on the black market, almost like Batman, you know, having like this cave of like artifacts, you know, you saw in the first Batman from the 80s with Bruce Wayne showing off, you know, this armor and all this other stuff. | ||
| And I should also mention that Purdue Farmer, back when they were a thing, you know, the creators of the OxyContin, they had a museum exhibit at the... | ||
| In New York at the Met that was dedicated to them and they had poured in millions of dollars into Egyptian antiquities and it raises questions. | ||
| Why are the most powerful people on earth so interested in the ancients? | ||
| I'm here to tell you that there's something there. | ||
| That the smartest, most richest, most powerful people on earth understand that there's real secrets to our ancient past. | ||
| And there seems to be a suppression of this evidence. | ||
| I can tell you right now that there is definitive evidence that shows that what we were taught in school about the true history of ancient civilizations has been debunked and that we were older and more advanced than what we were taught. | ||
| How old and how advanced is the debatable part? | ||
| But there's enough to upend our textbooks as it is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And this is the kind of stuff Well, ancient Egypt is kind of the keyhole into all of that. | |
| And Jimmy, I'm out of time. We got to do this again. | ||
| Jimmy Corsetti, bright insight. | ||
| I got another guest coming up, but we'll do this again, Jimmy. | ||
| This is just incredible stuff. | ||
| And your research is fantastic. | ||
| All right, folks, we'll be right back. All right, we're about to get real serious with new body cam footage that has come out now. | ||
| About 25 minutes worth. | ||
| That three minutes that we got before was just cut out of this now longer 25-minute body cam footage. | ||
| And so we're going to be joined by a veteran and not just a military veteran, but a veteran of law enforcement as well, the Alpha Warrior, who's going to be breaking this down. | ||
| And I was so impressed with this breakdown of the first release of the body cam footage. | ||
| I said, I got to get you on to explain this to my audience. | ||
| We weren't necessarily anticipating the release of this new body cam footage last night, but now it's going to be And even more important, breakdown. | ||
| Folks, if you like that last guest, and I know you're going to like this next guest, you're going to like my in-studio guest coming up, please support us at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| That's how this show is able to stay on air. | ||
| Literally, that's it. You're our sponsors. | ||
| Shopping at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| The products are great. I'm a product of the products at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It's stuff like... Nitric Boost for your cardiovascular health. | ||
| What are you doing for heart health? What are you doing for blood health? | ||
| If the answer is nothing, then the answer is Nitric Boost. | ||
| 40% off Infowarsstore.com, part of the Save Infowars mega sale. | ||
| And I get it. I don't even want to sit here and talk about the products, but we have to fund ourselves to be on air. | ||
| I'd rather spend this time talking to my guests, but we need your support. | ||
| So please, shop at Infowarsstore.com, get a great product, and keep this show on the air. | ||
| All right. Alpha Warrior. | ||
| We spoke, I believe it was Monday night, and we were talking about the body cam footage. | ||
| Well, now you've got even more to work with. | ||
| I'm sure you've reviewed it for your own show. | ||
| But do you want to start with some of the stuff that we talked about Monday? | ||
| Or do you want to just get into now we have even more body cam footage? | ||
| I guess I would start it by asking you this. | ||
| Do you think we're going to get more body cam footage? | ||
| And was there anything new in this recent release that sticks out to you? | ||
| I know certainly for me there was, but I want to hear it from you. | ||
| So I have not had a chance to look at the new footage. | ||
| So I'm excited to see it, to see if it answers some of the questions or corroborates some of the speculation I had from the original one. | ||
| So I'm very curious. | ||
| As far as answering the question, do I think we get more? | ||
| I think we'll get more. | ||
| It's just depending, are we going to get all of it? | ||
| And I think that's the important part because it's the stuff that they may not want to release. | ||
| They may either create more questions or answer some of the questions that we already have. | ||
| Well, I will tell you some of the things that you talked about that just pertain to body cam footage in general. | ||
| The same things pertain to this. | ||
| They did have a date there. | ||
| So there's a little date with a timestamp at the bottom. | ||
| But here's what's incredible about this. | ||
| And guys, pull up the images I sent you or you can.cam this. | ||
| So we now know, thanks to this body cam footage, because who knows what we can trust from Secret Service to the FBI? Probably nothing. | ||
| So we now know, thanks to this body cam footage and other analysis with Eli Crane's video and then the photo that Secret Service put out, There were Secret Service agents not only in that building. | ||
| That was a headquarters. | ||
| You can see in the video now that that was a stationed headquarters. | ||
| But then also we now see that the photo of Crooks was from the second story of that building. | ||
| And so here's the little cement block that he was climbing on. | ||
| And then you can see it's from this window. | ||
| Right here. So, okay, this begs the obvious question. | ||
| If Secret Service is stationed in the building, and if Secret Service is stationed on the roof, how is it, and now the timeline is it could have been 15 minutes before the first shot was fired that this guy was on the roof assembling his gun and everything else. | ||
| How is this possible? | ||
| How is it possible that he's able to be on that roof for more than 10 minutes if Secret Service is in that building? | ||
| It's not possible. The only way it's possible is if they allow him to. | ||
| Because with the amount of time, the amount of resources, and the amount of obstacles that he has to go through to get on that roof, you have more than one opportunity to stop him from doing it. | ||
| So if he's on that roof, it's because they allowed him to be on that roof. | ||
| And that's what I'm saying. And people want to get into all these different debates about was there more than one shooter or what does the audio analysis say or, you know, look at this water tower or whatever it is. | ||
| I'm sitting here and I'm saying, look, let's look at the obvious here. | ||
| There was a stand down and now there's a cover up. | ||
| I mean, let's focus on that. | ||
| Let's try to figure out what led to that, who was involved in that, because we know that that was the case. | ||
| Now, let's go back to the original body cam footage release, because I'm going to tell you, there's really not much else in there. | ||
| I mean, you might be able to pick up on some things from your law enforcement background of just general communications and stuff, but the three minutes from there on the roof is still the most important. | ||
| Again, like I said, the other stuff is them kind of walking around the grounds and then just an extended conversation on top of the roof. | ||
| It doesn't answer necessarily any of the questions you originally had. | ||
| So give your breakdown now of the original three minutes that we got that body cam footage earlier this week. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. So the first thing I'll bring people's attention to, since you briefly covered it already, is the data that's on the film that we're seeing here, on the video that we're seeing here. | ||
| You see a date, you see a timestamp. | ||
| Anybody that's ever seen our body cam footage, our video cams, there's a ton of information that's on there. | ||
| Either the officer's name or the unit number, the agency name, like there is a bunch of information that's on there. | ||
| Now, this looks like a GoPro camera that he had on his helmet with the timestamp on it, which they're not going to allow. | ||
| Especially, people got to remember, this isn't a patrol guy. | ||
| This isn't your just regular rank-and-file law enforcement. | ||
| This is part of your elite unit or their version of a SWAT team. | ||
| So these are guys that have been on the job not only for an extended amount of time, but they've surpassed all the knowledge and experience of what it takes to become on one of these elite teams or these tactical teams. | ||
| So that's who's on this roof. | ||
| Where is the information from the camera that, you know, per department policy, you're not going to have any other cameras that are on you, let alone training in a real-life event like this one. | ||
| The other thing where people say, well, maybe they censored it out. | ||
| Well, if that's the case, they will blur it. | ||
| We can't do, like if it was a document, we can't wipe something out like it was never there. | ||
| That we have to do, you could blur it out on the video, you could put a black box over, you know, you can censor it, and then there's more petitions with the court to get that information from not being redacted. | ||
| But this right here, they're making it seem like this is what it is. | ||
| So I'm very suspect of the video to begin with. | ||
| The next thing is when you look at the position of the body and, you know, with his head at the highest part, feet at the lowest part, going off the angle of the roof, and you look at the blood that's trailing down there, I'm not going to say it's impossible, but the likelihood that the blood pattern, when it's at towards the bottom, where it does this S pattern from one side to the other side, that's just not likely on an authentic scene where there's this type of blood trail. | ||
| And some of the markers that I use to make that opinion is when you see the thicker blood, you see there's a couple of parts where you see a finger that kind of breaks off of it. | ||
| You know, blood like water will go on the path of least resistance. | ||
| So if there's a finger that's breaking off, then all the blood would have went that way or would have went the other way. | ||
| The other thing people have to understand is the consistency or the thickness of blood is much thicker than water. | ||
| So it's also going to be harder to change the flow of where the blood's going. | ||
| This just has the hallmarks of something somebody would do based off their knowledge of... | ||
| Well, let me just pause you right there, guys, and just try to get a stationary shot, if you will. | ||
| If you go back like three seconds, it's a better shot. | ||
| Now, when you were first explaining this to me on Monday... | ||
| I'll be honest, I kind of discounted it, and I was like, well, you know, I don't really know if I want to lean into that. | ||
| It could just be a dirty roof or something. | ||
| Like, eh, I'm not sure if there's really anything there. | ||
| But actually, when you look closer here, guys, especially if you zoom in, and again, there might be better angles of this now, and when you review the longer footage, you might get a better idea. | ||
| Of what's going on here. | ||
| But to talk about your theory, at the end of that roof ledge, it actually looks like it's drops. | ||
| Like, look, it doesn't look like it was a flow, like a river. | ||
| It looks like it's literally like drops, like there's almost, like they're not even all touching. | ||
| So that's what you're talking about. | ||
| I'm glad the crew is zooming in on this now. | ||
| So that's what you're saying. You're saying that this flow of blood to you doesn't look right. | ||
| It doesn't. The officer that's in the black SWAT uniform right there, and right where the light on his rifle is, there's actually a lip that's right there on the roof. | ||
| And when the blood hits right there, there's a little bit of pulling, but then it continues on the trail. | ||
| What you would expect there is the pooling at that part, because you can see an indentation on the roof that runs kind of parallel. | ||
| It would be more. | ||
| You would see that. But this looks like a continuum of where they would drop it. | ||
| And this is why you have these erratic patterns in the blood. | ||
| Then as it continues on the way down. | ||
| Blood doesn't react like that to this type of thing. | ||
| I'm telling you. I'm not going to say it's impossible. | ||
| I'm just going to say it's very, very unlikely that the pattern we see there is what we would expect to see in that kind of situation with the variables. | ||
| A slight angle to the roof. | ||
| Where he was, using their theory on the heat of the roof, that's going to even affect the blood pattern, but it's going to affect it more in keeping it more linear than making it to where it's going to go off the side because the blood's going to be coagulating as it's going down, which means it's even harder to shift the direction of the blood. | ||
| So the blood pattern on here is a major hiccup for me. | ||
| The other thing now, and for those in your show especially because I know there's a lot of veterans that watch, a lot of law enforcement people that watch, You know, just as a regular officer, one of the most important pieces of equipment that you have on your body is your watch, whether it be military or law enforcement. | ||
| This is your SWAT team. | ||
| The watch is an important, it's a critical piece of uniform because one, it's timing and being in sync. | ||
| We refer to them. The officer that's wearing the black SWAT uniform doesn't have any watch. | ||
| The officer that we're watching his body camera footage doesn't have any watch. | ||
| That's one of those things I know people may say, well, now you're just getting picky. | ||
| I'm not getting picky when people understand when it comes to uniform and what's going on here, especially because as you're taking notes and you're referring information, you're going to use that watch as a way to document that time. | ||
| And people say, oh, you can pull out your phone. | ||
| You could, but in tactics, we're not because if you're in a situation where you don't want to illuminate yourself and turning on your phone would create that. | ||
| This part of the video, which is interesting, I'll cover it. | ||
| It's blurring his phone. | ||
| So we're seeing that the screen's blurred, which is fine. | ||
| I would expect them to have it blurred. | ||
| But then there's a part where they unblur when he goes to show the videos to the FBI investigator that's there. | ||
| It's one of those things where you're going to blur it. | ||
| Or you're not. So it's almost like they want to bring your attention to that particular part of the video, which, you know, it just doesn't make sense to me. | ||
| Also, because you see the rifle here, and the rifle's probably somewhere between maybe... | ||
| Well, wait a second. Let's get to the rifle in a second, because there's another important aspect of the cell phone that you pointed out earlier, and then how they unblur it. | ||
| And this kind of gets me into another question here. | ||
| So they have it blurred, and then they unblur it. | ||
| I mean, maybe there was some personal information on there or something, but then it seems like they unblur it because they want you to see the dead shooter, and they put out the video of supposedly the dead shooter's face. | ||
| Maybe there's some questions with that. | ||
| But then they blur out the dead body on the roof. | ||
| So it seems like there's no consistency in what you're supposed to see or you're not supposed to see. | ||
| I agree completely. And this goes to, are they trying to form a narrative? | ||
| And I know we're not hearing audio on this, but if people remember, at the very beginning of this body camera footage, the first statement you hear, and it comes from the FBI agent, is, we don't know. | ||
| And for those that, you know, subscribe to the idea of predictive programming and seed phrases and all that, the first thing we're all introduced to in this clip from where they started at the three-minute mark is, we don't know. | ||
| So whether it resonates with people or they subconsciously hear, it's one of those things where all the things that I'm mentioning here, if they were just that single thing, then maybe we could write it off. | ||
| Maybe we can call it a coincidence. | ||
| But one of the things that we do in investigations, especially when it comes to homicides, is you have to look at the totality of all the information that's in front of you, even when it comes to circumstantial stuff. | ||
| And what kind of picture does that paint for you? | ||
| What kind of opinion does that form for you? | ||
| And in a situation like this, you just have things that are inconsistent with the uniforms, things that are inconsistent with anybody that's gone to homicide school and studied the blood patterns and blood splatter and blood drainage or been to fatalities if they've never been to homicide school, traffic accidents. | ||
| You've seen enough blood to know what you would expect in certain situations. | ||
| Like I said, not a complete thing, but the likelihood. | ||
| Now, to the part on the rifle, When they breach the roof after he's been killed, after the sniper team takes him out, they're going up there. | ||
| Now, by this time, we know that the spotter and, well, I'll speculate that we know that the spotter and the sniper have kept their eyes on this guy while the team's on their way over there to confirm that the suspect is dead, which means they're not going to see any movements. | ||
| They're probably going to be seeing some of the blood maybe draining down, depending on what their angle looks like, maybe not. | ||
| But when that team breaches and they're approaching the suspect, they're going to see a severe wound to his head. | ||
| If you look at, especially if the sniper team, which most of them are using some type of like 308 Lapua round, it's going to do extreme damage to the head, even if it's not a direct hit. | ||
| So once they approach the body, they're going to know definitively if this guy's dead or not, before they even get to him to do a pulse check, because you still have to touch the body. | ||
| Once they do that and they know he's dead, why would you move that firearm that far away? | ||
| Why would you move it at all? | ||
| You know that you just had an assassination attempt on the president. | ||
| You know other people were critically wounded. | ||
| Maybe you do or you don't know that there's a fatality. | ||
| But you know that the one weapon that's going to have more forensic analysis done to it than anything is this firearm. | ||
| So why would you compromise that? | ||
| Once again, it brings me back to these aren't just regular cops. | ||
| These are guys that have probably already been detectives. | ||
| They probably already work special assignments. | ||
| They understand the value of not contaminating or disrupting a scene, especially a homicide scene. | ||
| This kind of brings me to the opinion, well, then why would they? | ||
| If for some reason there's more going on here than we understand, and I'll explain my second here, but If there's more going on, it leads me to believe that they train this more like an active shooter scenario, where you're approaching, you get the suspect, you immediately move the firearm, you continue what's going on, but it just doesn't add up to the experience level which you would think these guys would have. | ||
| Now, the one thing I do want to say, Owen, just to make sure people understand, I'm not by any means saying that on the day that this is a fake event. | ||
| I believe there was a legitimate, real-life attempt on President Donald Trump's life. | ||
| I believe two Americans were critically injured, and I believe the first responder here on this country lost his life that day. | ||
| I think the reason Trump's alive is because of divine intervention. | ||
| Now, that being said, it doesn't mean that there's other things that are not going on that are meant to influence the way we see this or the things that we want to believe. | ||
| And that's why I'm trying to point some of these things out there here. | ||
| Well, and you mentioned the rifle. | ||
| Okay, so let's say, let's go with maybe because they had a couple other events that got Secret Service priority or even local or state police priority. | ||
| Let's just say they had a guy on that roof who was probably not qualified to be there first who put the rifle aside. | ||
| He just didn't know any better. Let's just say that that's the case for the sake of this direction now that I want to go in. | ||
| I'm yet to see any shell casings. | ||
| Now, they say they found eight shell casings on the roof, and even if they wanted to argue, well, okay, they rolled down to the bottom, well, how is it that they don't even present this evidence, or we don't see a single shell casing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
How do you make sense of that? That part's interesting. | |
| That's why I want to see the rest of the video because people got to know that the rifle, it's going to eject on the right-hand side. | ||
| So it's going to eject towards the opposite place of where we see that rifle or where we see the body. | ||
| But they do show us a pan in that video in that three-minute segment. | ||
| And when they do show us that, you don't see any casings anywhere. | ||
| And the other thing is those guys would not be standing where the shell casings are. | ||
| And where they're all standing is where you would assume, you know, where you would speculate based on where the ejection port is on that rifle. | ||
| That's where those shell casings would eject from. | ||
| So unless every shell casing hit the roof and then rolled down to the ground, which I doubt that's possible. | ||
| Statistically, that doesn't sound like it's possible because of the way the angles they eject and the way they're going to hit. | ||
| You're going to get some. They're going to get caught on those little eaves that are raised. | ||
| You see the same part that makes the blood pool a little bit. | ||
| That would actually catch a casing or two, if not all of them. | ||
| It just doesn't make sense that they're saying they found eight. | ||
| Like, see, you're not seeing casings anywhere. | ||
| And here's the thing where people say, well, okay, they probably collected them for evidence. | ||
| Well, then that means they would have collected the rifle. | ||
| That means there's a lot of things that you would have seen that were collected there. | ||
| You're not going to collect one piece of evidence and not collect the other. | ||
| Correct me if I'm wrong. If they do collect it, they put a line on where they collected it from so that they can still have kind of a crime scene layout to do a further evaluation. | ||
| They wouldn't just pick it up and that's that. | ||
| No, at a minimum, you would either see plastic placards with numbers or letters. | ||
| If they didn't have placards, you would see some type of spray paint that they could spray paint around them. | ||
| Although on a homicide, you probably wouldn't want to use that because you don't want to compromise the surface. | ||
| But you would at least see some type of marking to answer your question where evidence was at. | ||
| Well, I do look forward to see you break down the rest of the video. | ||
| Again, the three minutes that we've already seen is pretty much the meat of it. | ||
| Is there anything else you want to get into as far as the original video or any other anomalies you want to point to before I ask you any other questions? | ||
| One thing I'll say is because let me address the water tower thing because so many people are trying to put meaning behind that. | ||
| And this is what I will say. | ||
| Do I think they should have had a SWAT team up there? | ||
| Absolutely. I know there's some military men that are snipers that are making comments to that. | ||
| What I will say to address that is military sniper teams, even though they have the experience of being snipers in combat in the military, law enforcement still has policies to where it doesn't always add up the same. | ||
| At a minimum, since you didn't have a sniper team up there, you would have still had law enforcement at the base of that water tower because if you're not going to use it, you're going to make sure nobody else uses it. | ||
| So that's my opinion as far as the law enforcement aspect of the tower. | ||
| As far as the conspiracies that are going out about a shooter being up there and then using a zip line, here's the thing, you guys. | ||
| One, there is no tactical zip line that's in existence, as far as I know, to where you would be able to retract it and pull all your evidence. | ||
| For those that want to subscribe that there was a shooter on the tower, we would have saw evidence right there. | ||
| And if there is a second shooter on the tower, it would be a shooter that whoever's behind this would not want anybody to know about, which means you wouldn't have a zip line. | ||
| Maybe a repelling system because those can retract, but then it goes against some of the speculations and conspiracies that are out there. | ||
| The other thing is you have to get down from there. | ||
| And at that point when this is all breaking out and we know that that compound had a lot of law enforcement there, you would assume that somebody would have saw something unless they're trying to conceal that too. | ||
| And the other thing too is When they do the autopsy on Corey's body, when they break down the crime scene, there's things that we do out there that allow us, within a very precise accuracy, to determine the angles of where these impacts were. | ||
| Even defining them in objects, like, you know, I know there was the crane that was hit, you know, there's the ground. | ||
| But you would be able to tell, because that is the highest point in that immediate area, Based on the trajectory during the forensics of the scene, you would know that somebody was up on the tower. | ||
| So if you had someone there and there was the purposes of concealing the quote-unquote real shooter, then you would give it away. | ||
| So, you know, and I do entertain that the idea that there is a potential second shooter, but just people understand that if that's the case, it's going to be somebody that's positioned closer to the angles of what the Patsy in that type of scenario would look like. | ||
| It rules out the tower in every type of circumstance, and I hope people understand that. | ||
| Yeah, I completely agree. | ||
| And again, I'm not close-minded to the potential of a second shooter in all of this, but everything has to add up. | ||
| And if so, somebody shooting from the water tower, there's just no evidence. | ||
| There's just no forensic evidence. | ||
| Yeah, somebody there says water tower. | ||
| Yeah, people are running to the water tower. | ||
| But we have to go off forensic evidence. | ||
| Obviously, it's tough to reach conclusions because this whole thing is so crazy, but we have so much video from the day that there are certain things that we can basically put into a formula and say, okay, here's what's possible and here's what's not. | ||
| And so, yeah, I completely agree that the angle of whatever shooters there were, they had to come from somewhere within a short degree of an angle from where the shooter on the roof was. | ||
| I mean... I even look at the windows and I'm like, and I don't know if you've done this analysis, but I even look at the windows and I'm like, I don't even know if the angles make sense with the windows. | ||
| The only thing I could see making sense with a second shooter is if the second shooter was there to take out the shooter on the roof. | ||
| Because the angles do all align, from my best analysis, with the position of the shooter on the roof. | ||
| Absolutely. Like if somebody asked me, where would there be a second shooter if I believe there would be one? | ||
| If you look at an aerial view of that area, the farthest building in that lot opposite of where the shooter is, is also the highest portion of that building. | ||
| And even in the body camera, there's a part where they show the telephone pole that's back there. | ||
| If you had a shooter that was roughly, you know, at the farthest part or the highest part of that building in line with that telephone pole, it would give you the angle that you would need to mimic that. | ||
| That's where I would say it would be. | ||
| But you did remind me of something I did want to cover as well. | ||
| The FBI agent, when he's interviewing these SWAT officers, he's holding a notepad with his own phone. | ||
| But he never uses it. | ||
| So why are you there doing an interview, but you never jot down notes? | ||
| It's just one of those things that it's a curiosity that when you add it to the totality of things that are going on, it just doesn't make sense to me. | ||
| And here's the other thing. Anybody that's ever fired an AR rifle or an AR-style rifle, you know how loud those things are, even if you're outdoors. | ||
| You have a window that's right there that obviously is already open because we saw the previous photo when they took pictures of them going over that retaining wall. | ||
| How do you not hear that if you're in there? | ||
| And if you are in there and you hear that and you look out the window, how do you not eliminate, like, quickly eliminate the threat from that position? | ||
| How is he able to get that many shots off when we know that those personnel right there to where the rifle they're showing us on that roof does not have any type of suppressor on it? | ||
| You know, the barrel is open on that rifle, which means it's going to be as loud as it can possibly be. | ||
| Why didn't anybody in that room address it? | ||
| And it was two bursts. It wasn't even one burst. | ||
| It was a delayed response. | ||
| It was two bursts. Obviously, there was a stand-down somehow in that building. | ||
| I mean, folks, this is crazy. | ||
| They're in the building. | ||
| They're literally in the building. | ||
| The body cam footage shows it's a station headquarters for the event. | ||
| I mean, how in the hell is it possible that he's up there for 10 minutes? | ||
| And I would say, too, it looks like at this point that that's probably the bag that he had his gun in. | ||
| I mean, we're talking 10 minutes to assemble the gun and everything. | ||
| All right, quickly, I'm out of time here. | ||
| Actually, you know what? Let's do five more minutes. | ||
| Let's just do five more minutes, because I want to ask you just basic detective questions that I just want to get on the record from you here that Christopher Wray refused to answer, or didn't refuse to answer, maybe was just outright dishonest about, or maybe he's just that incompetent. | ||
| All right, we're going to do five more minutes, then my next in-studio guest comes up. | ||
| Alpha Warrior is our guest. | ||
| Military experience, law enforcement experience, breaking down this body cam footage. | ||
| All right, we got five more minutes with the Alpha Warrior. | ||
| AlphaWarrior.tv. | ||
| AlphaWarriorX on X is where you can follow his reporting, and I'm sure I'll be following up with him. | ||
| We'll probably speak again as more information comes out. | ||
| But AlphaWarrior, this one is kind of obvious, but I just want to get your statements on the record here. | ||
| Christopher Wray, during his hearing this week, claims he talked to the counter sniper team. | ||
| Specifically, he says he talked to the counter sniper that fired the kill shot that killed the shooter on the roof. | ||
| But then he says he doesn't know where he took the shot from. | ||
| Is that even possible? | ||
| I mean, if you're a detective and you're analyzing a crime scene and somebody involved takes a lethal shot, are you going to try to figure out where they took the shot from? | ||
| Absolutely. Because he wants to make sure that the statement that the sniper has given him is consistent with where the sniper was. | ||
| And for him to know whether his sniper team has given him an honest response or not, he needs to know how everything was situated. | ||
| So no, I don't believe that. | ||
| Had he said he doesn't remember, which I wouldn't have believed, it just would have been more believable. | ||
| But no, I don't think he was telling the truth in that statement. | ||
| Well, I would say if it was a test, Kim Cheadle got a 0%. | ||
| FBI Director Wray got maybe like a 5%. | ||
| So he did better than 0%. | ||
| He gets a 5% grade. | ||
| Both of them failed miserably. | ||
| Cheadle has resigned since. | ||
| I doubt Wray... Well, Wray said he's not going to resign. | ||
| All right, so where are you at today? | ||
| We're now 13 days post-assassination attempt on Trump. | ||
| And I do believe we'll still have more information that might help us get a clearer picture | ||
| of what happened that day. | ||
| And I even suspect, because if you look at some of these new videos coming out, | ||
| which at the beginning I was so frustrated, I was like, who has a cell phone from 2008 | ||
| that records this 480p footage that we keep seeing everywhere? | ||
| And then finally, we actually get some HD footage. | ||
| And in the footage you can see, there's dozens, if not hundreds of people filming. | ||
| So I still think there's a lot more footage that we'll get access to. | ||
| Why does TMZ cut the video when it's like the most important aspect before he fires a shot? | ||
| So there's a lot of things that I think we may still see. | ||
| But have you reached any conclusions or where are you leaning into certain questions or what do you think about everything that happened that day just two weeks after? | ||
| Well, one of the things that I hope our politicians, FOIA, or anybody can have this ability to FOIA is in that three-minute body cam footage. | ||
| Earlier in the video, the FBI agent's talking about how they have two people detained and that these people were filming the shooter, then everybody running, then the shooter, then everybody running says maybe they're involved, maybe they're not. | ||
| Well, if the statements are true, that they recorded this, we need to foil that video so we can actually see video of this alleged shooter taking the shots. | ||
| If you want to eliminate the conspiracy or the speculation... | ||
| Do you think they have that video as evidence? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that what you're saying? Absolutely, they have that evidence. | |
| Absolutely. If you detain people, and at the moment you're detaining them based on their own statements, you're trying to figure out whether they're involved or not, at a minimum, you're going to collect those devices, you're going to sell, write them, you're going to collect what's on them regarding this particular event before you release those things back to them. | ||
| So they have that information. | ||
| And the other thing our politicians need to do is, I understand they're subpoenaing, Ray. | ||
| I understand they're subpoenaing Cheeto. | ||
| But if somebody died on an operating table at the hospital, yeah, maybe you subpoena the owner of the hospital for policies, but you're going to be subpoenaing the doctor and the people that were present to get these answers. | ||
| So we need Chuck Grassley and these other people that are bringing these people in to testify. | ||
| Subpoena the case agent. | ||
| Every one of these operation plans that were given to Secret Service from all different entities that day have the case agent and the assistant agent. | ||
| Bring those people in. All those people have real-time information on exactly what happened. | ||
| So if you truly want to pursue the truth, those are the people you need to talk to. | ||
| Well, I'll tell you what, and I could have announced this earlier, and I'm not sure if it's officially been filed. | ||
| My lawyer and I are filing a FOIA request with the police departments that were on the ground that day and the Secret Service. | ||
| I'm not sure if it's been filed yet. | ||
| I'll ask and find out. | ||
| I'm pretty sure everything you mentioned is even in the FOIA because we went through it pretty thoroughly to make sure we had as much in there as possible. | ||
| But maybe I'll even send you a screenshot of the things we're asking for and if there's anything you think we should add to it. | ||
| But we are sending a FOIA request officially to Secret Service and the police for footage, audio, and pretty much everything. | ||
| There's about 10 different bullet points. | ||
| All right, Alpha Warrior, thank you for your time. | ||
| We'll be in touch. God bless. | ||
| Alright, so this is interesting. | ||
| Now, this is normally the veterans call-in show, and we only do veterans guests. | ||
| We're making an exception today for Kenny Webster because of all the great work he's done for veterans with Wheelchairs for Warriors. | ||
| It was actually, you guys were doing your big Christmas push. | ||
| When I was in prison. And so that's actually how I listen to your show, Walton& Johnson, every morning. | ||
| I think you guys, what is it, 7 to 10? | ||
| Is that the right time? 5.30 to 10 a.m. | ||
| 5.30 to 10 a.m. | ||
| You never know when you're in solitary confinement. | ||
| You don't even know what time it is. | ||
| You're just kind of, you know. | ||
| And you know how radio works. | ||
| Not every affiliate carries the whole show. | ||
| That's true. That's true. | ||
| So this affiliate might have just been like 6 to 10. | ||
| Point is... This gentleman and his show, Walton& Johnson, was my main, if not only, source of news at that time when I was in solitary. | ||
| I had my little twist-up radio. | ||
| That's how you charged it. | ||
| You literally twisted it to give it battery. | ||
| Built for hurricanes and stuff like that. | ||
| Well, yes, it was. Or for prisoners. | ||
| Or built for prisoners. Whatever. | ||
| Whatever the case is. So it was your show, Walton& Johnson, which is funny, informative. | ||
| I listened every day. | ||
| And then I get out, and I think I sent you a message. | ||
| I think I sent you a message that was like, hey, man, great to see your Twitter account. | ||
| You kept me sane when I was in prison. | ||
| This is awesome. And now here you are. | ||
| Dude, career highlight being on Infowars. | ||
| This, to me as a radio guy... | ||
| I'm not often in front of a camera. | ||
| It's very awkward for me. We do parody and silly voices. | ||
| You get to come in looking disheveled and you don't have to shave or anything. | ||
| Yeah, this is the first time I've worn pants in months. | ||
| I actually believe that from some of the things I've heard on your show. | ||
| You're part of our research because we're... | ||
| We're like a combination of comedy and real news and stuff, but part of our show prep is looking at what you do, what Alex does, what Paul Joseph Watson does, people affiliated with you guys. | ||
| You guys are so much farther ahead of everybody else right now on what happened to Butler, on what is going... | ||
| and scrubbing the internet, the Soviet-esque rewriting of Kamala's biography. | ||
| And we're not journalists. | ||
| We're just, you know, comedians on the radio. | ||
| Have you had to deal with anything? | ||
| Because you guys are syndicated. | ||
| Have you guys had to deal with any of the censorship problems? | ||
| Has anybody ever tried to get you off air? | ||
| It's a great question. | ||
| For years, people turned to the internet for less censored media. | ||
| And then when the COVID thing hit... | ||
| Suddenly it was old school media. | ||
| You guys are... You're doing new media and old media because we're on the radio right now, right? | ||
| Yes. So the only thing we can't do on our show is swear. | ||
| Whereas, like, on the Internet, on YouTube, you can't talk about the vaccines. | ||
| You can't talk about the election results. | ||
| You can't talk about Biden's broken brain. | ||
| I once got a flag on YouTube for predicting the results of the California gubernatorial runoff. | ||
| I said, I don't think Larry Elder's going to win. | ||
| And I woke up the next morning and YouTube said, you ought not post anything for 60 days. | ||
| And then Larry Elder didn't win. | ||
| Lo and behold... I was just predicting what I thought would happen. | ||
| Why can't you do that? Wow, that's a great question. | ||
| They didn't tell you. Why can't you cast doubt on the vaccines? | ||
| Well, we know why that is. | ||
| They've got to get their money. They've got to get their mandates. | ||
| Right. It's probably the same thing with California. | ||
| Yeah, why can't you make an election prediction? | ||
| If I knew the answer... | ||
| Soon you just can't cover an election. | ||
| No. That'll be what they do. | ||
| Maybe that's their move. You just can't cover an election. | ||
| Oh, Kamala Harris wins 50 states. | ||
| Hey, I kind of question that. Right. | ||
| Shut down. One of the things I think that keeps people from coming after us the way they come after you guys is that we claim to not be taken seriously. | ||
| You know, we try to we inject comedy and humor into what we're doing. | ||
| And so people look at us and like, ah, they're doing boner jokes about politicians. | ||
| It's fine. But it's the same news you guys are doing. | ||
| Well, that's what was so great for me, because when I'm saying when I can't leave my cell for four weeks, When I was put in general for the last week or so of my sentence, then you get access to a TV and you get to talk with some other people. | ||
| There's a little more room for trying to figure out what's going on. | ||
| Now, I didn't have access to a phone, but other people did. | ||
| So they're like, hey, did you hear this? This guy on the phone just told me. | ||
| So I'm sitting in there. Because I used to produce radio as well when I was younger. | ||
| Where at? St. Louis, KFNS, KXFN. And so, but I used to do, you guys do like segment bits. | ||
| Like we used to do the, like, you know, the Kill Mary bang bit and stuff like that. | ||
| You guys do some bits like that. | ||
| So it was like, it was great for me though, because I'm just sitting in the cell and I'm laughing, but then I'm also getting information that I wouldn't be getting anywhere else. | ||
| Like when Speaker Johnson was finally chosen, it just, it was other news like that. | ||
| So, I mean, you were my main source of news for at least four weeks. | ||
| Yeah, I mean... You were. You're goofy ass. | ||
| Thanks, man. It's a great honor. | ||
| That is very cool to me. | ||
| I think... I hate to compare us to the left, but if we were the left, I think that we're sort of like the Daily Show if you guys were CNN. And that's the worst comparison that's ever been made on this network. | ||
| But, you know, that's what it is, is we're doing parody and satire for people that get their news from Breitbart. | ||
| I used to write for Breitbart for years. | ||
| In fact, my mentor... Is very good friends with your mentor. | ||
| Mancow Muller was the guy that got me into radio. | ||
| And I think he's been on this channel before many times. | ||
| He was on with Alex after Rush Limbaugh died. | ||
| That was the last time Mancow was on. | ||
| He did a great interview. It was about an hour long. | ||
| But yeah, he came on with Alex after Rush died. | ||
| That was the last time he was on. You, Rush, and Mancow... | ||
| All started your careers doing radio in Missouri. | ||
| That's true. Isn't that weird? That's true. | ||
| Yeah. It's a decent state. | ||
| And then you and I are also mutual friends with another guy from Missouri, Austin Peterson. | ||
| Yes, and he has a morning radio show now too. | ||
| Dana Lash started on St. | ||
| Louis Airwaves as well. | ||
| There's a lot of people that have come out of St. | ||
| Louis. Yeah, and people in the, you know, the coastal elitist write-off, the flyover state media people as being so irrelevant. | ||
| But everybody we just mentioned came from nothing and now has a huge audience and influences millions of people. | ||
| And, you know, like a lot of people don't even know who we are. | ||
| We have a million listeners a week. | ||
| Oh, I was stunned. I mean, because I heard, when I heard your show, I was like, this is, I mean, you guys do a great, your production level is as great as it gets. | ||
| I mean, I could tell, I could tell you guys were pros. | ||
| Like, production level is good as it gets when it comes to syndicated radio. | ||
| And so I'm like, wow, these guys must be huge. | ||
| How have I not heard of them before? | ||
| Yeah. The media doesn't, you know, the liberal media doesn't think we exist. | ||
| There have been many news stories written about us, and the headline is always, local radio personalities do blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Steve Johnson, the guy that created the show, our show's been around since 1983. | ||
| He is a genius. | ||
| He's like the Harry Shear or the Seth MacFarlane. | ||
| Is that your co-host? | ||
| Yeah. That does the voices? Yeah. | ||
| Right, exactly. So a little behind the scenes here. | ||
| If you listen to the radio, one of the reasons we call our audience the Ten Percenters is only one in ten people is going to understand the humor, is going to understand the politics, is going to appreciate the delivery. | ||
| Steve is, I mean, just brilliant at making his voice sound like anything. | ||
| And he's doing characters that argue with each other and they have very intricate biographies. | ||
| We forget sometimes they have birthdays and family members. | ||
| Like, when you got out of prison, one of the things you and I talked about is like, yeah, Owen's out. | ||
| He wants to meet Kenny and Billy Ed. | ||
| And I was like, well, win-lose on that one. | ||
| Billy Ed's not really a real guy. | ||
| I was upset. I was like, hey. | ||
| But that's how I knew it was such a high-quality thing. | ||
| You can tell the genius of Steve just by the high production level. | ||
| But, you know, what you're talking about here is most... | ||
| How do I explain this? When you look at people that are going to vote for Trump, it's the people that they don't want you to talk about. | ||
| It's the average American that lives in what they call the flyover states and they just pretend like you don't have an opinion, you don't have a vote, you don't matter because you don't follow Hollywood and you don't follow the cool hip-hop culture and you don't go to the Olivia Rodrigo concert and so they just assume you don't matter. | ||
| That's actually the average American. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I don't get invited to cocktail parties. | ||
| A lot of the... We do a lot of regional politics. | ||
| You guys do national stuff. | ||
| We're a regional show. | ||
| So we're big in New Orleans. | ||
| We're big in Baton Rouge. Houston. | ||
| Yeah, I picked you up out of Baton Rouge. | ||
| Right. Memphis. This is where our audience is at. | ||
| The local politicians in those towns know us. | ||
| They hate us. They've tried to make our life... | ||
| We notice when we go through the airport in these parts of the country... | ||
| We have trouble traveling in places where we're known and then not in places where we're not known. | ||
| Trouble traveling? You know, it's like, that's weird. | ||
| We get randomly flagged at the Shreveport Airport, but not when we're in Denver. | ||
| You know what I mean? Okay. Sometimes it's a coincidence. | ||
| Sometimes it's not, Owen. You know what I mean? | ||
| It's rarely a coincidence. | ||
| Are you sure they're not stopping you because you forgot to put pants on? | ||
| I mean, that could be it. Apparently that's a touchy side. | ||
| That might be the one. But now nudists are a protected class. | ||
| That's true. Conservatives are not. | ||
| Just say you're a tranny like the new Olympic promoters. | ||
| How about that, dude? | ||
| They're really leaning into the anti-Christian stuff. | ||
| People are already defending this on social media. | ||
| A transgender, a transvestite carried the Olympic torch. | ||
| Is that what that was? Because I saw him put it on the screen. | ||
| I didn't see that. The final torch was a tranny? | ||
| I don't know what order it came in, because I've been traveling all day. | ||
| I did another TV show yesterday, your buddy Alex Stein. | ||
| Yeah, I was with Sarah Gonzalez, Alex Stein. | ||
| They told me to tell you hi. They're all friends and fans. | ||
| I don't know if your audience knows that. | ||
| That's nice of them. And I guess Alex was just on their show, on one of their channels, one of their shows. | ||
| So the last Olympic torchbearer was a transgender. | ||
| But see, here's what's so crazy about it, and you mentioned this. | ||
| It's like... This isn't just something where they kind of throw... | ||
| It's so weird, dude. | ||
| Oh my gosh. This is so demonic and gross. | ||
| I'm surprised that wasn't used as a, well... | ||
| You know what? We'll just... | ||
| Yeah, I know. We know what you're saying. | ||
| No, we know. With the flame. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With the flame. It's the... | |
| I'd be like, I'm not going to touch that. | ||
| I'm not touching that. The joke writes itself. | ||
| Go ahead, people, in the comments section. | ||
| There's another one. There's a bearded lady. | ||
| And then they did a thing with the Last Supper. | ||
| Yeah, that's where I was going to go. | ||
| But that's what I'm saying. This isn't like some amalgamation. | ||
| It's like, oh, it just happens to look like... | ||
| No, they sat down and they said, how can we offend Christians? | ||
| How can we blaspheme the Last Supper? | ||
| Like, how can we write this in and then make it something that's our own? | ||
| Right. And you know, to me, Owen, I'm not offended easily. | ||
| I watch, I've seen Taliban beheading videos and, you know, cartel shootouts and stuff like that. | ||
| I've been shocked before. | ||
| It doesn't take much to shock me. | ||
| The reason this bothers me, it's not that it's supposed to be insulting to me because you can't hurt my feelings. | ||
| Well, and you're based out of Houston, right? | ||
| Right. It's just that I understand. | ||
| Some craziness in Houston. Nuts. | ||
| It's human trafficking capital of America. | ||
| The reason this concerns me is I know what the intended consequences are. | ||
| The intended consequence is to normalize pedophilia. | ||
| It's to normalize child grooming. | ||
| It's to normalize sexualizing our kids. | ||
| So there's the bearded... | ||
| Like, what is the point of this? | ||
| Is this what French values are? | ||
| I don't know. I don't think so. | ||
| Apparently... Maybe? I don't know. | ||
| Right. And you know what else is great about this? | ||
| Are there a bunch of trannies in France? | ||
| I've never... I didn't know that. | ||
| You know... They found every single one is what they did. | ||
| I gotta think there's more, Owen. | ||
| We're gonna find every single transgender individual in France and we're gonna make him a part of this Olympic opening ceremony. | ||
| But you know, I also try to see the silver lining. | ||
| I'm an optimist. One of the other torchbearers was newcomer Trump supporter Snoop Dogg. | ||
| Oh, really? In France? | ||
| Yeah, apparently he was part of it, yeah. | ||
| Well, he might be the one that's going to take the torch and bring it to L.A. when they come here in, I think it's 2026. | ||
| I haven't watched any of it. | ||
| And it's not that it's beneath me. | ||
| I've just had a busy week doing stuff. | ||
| Because I do get into watching this stuff. | ||
| I do like this stuff. | ||
| I like watching people who are great at what they do compete. | ||
| I do. I like watching people that have mastered their craft. | ||
| Whether it's an athlete or a musician, do you think he's high? | ||
| How did Snoop Dogg, like, how much willpower did it take for him to not make a joke that he's smoking a joint? | ||
| Oh, yes! | ||
| That's even better than the tranny joke. | ||
| Because he had to think of it. | ||
| I mean, no offense to Snoop Dogg. | ||
| It would almost be just like a reaction. | ||
| He's a three-hit wonder, right? | ||
| Like, he raps, he smokes weed, and then what else does he do? | ||
| He carries the Olympic torch. | ||
| And he hangs out with Martha Stewart. | ||
| I'm surprised it wasn't even just a muscle memory. | ||
| Like, he just got it and just immediately, oh, wait, oh, this isn't a... | ||
| But no, so the Olympics come here 2026, and then they actually, the United States was just awarded the 2032 Olympics, I think, in Salt Lake, too. | ||
| I think it was 2032. And I see this, and I'm like, please, don't look at what the French did for this opening ceremony and think, we've got to go further. | ||
| Please. I don't know. | ||
| But it's in LA. So, I mean, who knows? | ||
| Gavin Newsom might, you know, get up there and bring out the Dodgers trannies. | ||
| You always wonder if these cultural phenomenons are going to red pill people. | ||
| And I'll give you an example that everybody in your audience probably remembers. | ||
| We all know when the women's gymnastics team got raped by the doctor. | ||
| Like, really sick, disgusting stuff. | ||
| They covered it up. And then the less covered, I mean, it was a blip on the newsreel, was all these female Olympic gymnastic stars coming out and saying, the FBI covered this up. | ||
| Now, as conservatives and libertarians and populists and nationalists that watch this show, who watching this show right now doesn't hate the FBI? Well, there was a very fascinating moment not that long ago, between now and the last Olympics, where every one of these girls that we're going to watch over the next couple weeks got in front of cameras and said, hey... You know, without saying it, conservatives were right about the FBI. My question for you, Owen, do you think America remembers that? | ||
| No, and this is the incredible power that the mainstream media has, that I think they're starting to lose. | ||
| They're not, it hasn't been completely lost yet. | ||
| It's starting to slip, right? | ||
| It's starting to slip through their fingertips, though, and they know it, and that's why Internet censorship is so important. | ||
| Look at this guy, no chin. | ||
| Oh, my God. If they don't, they have, they've had the power in the past, not as much anymore, but they've had the power in the past where if they don't cover something, it doesn't happen. | ||
| Right. It doesn't exist. | ||
| That's it. And it's, you know, you could call it Orwellian or Soviet-esque. | ||
| So many examples this week. | ||
| Well, Kamala isn't, the borders are. | ||
| How about that? Isn't that amazing? | ||
| And it's not hard to find this stuff. | ||
| CNN reported on it. | ||
| It's been mentioned in congressional documents. | ||
| Kamala Harris didn't promote the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| There's a literal tweet. | ||
| She put the link out and said, donate. | ||
| Right. Or how about her bailing out the rioters? | ||
| It's in the link! Because now they're saying that never happened. | ||
| Like, no, it happened. It happened and they bragged about it. | ||
| I just, you know, it's so strange. | ||
| And I have, I'm sure you do too, I have liberal friends, leftist friends, Democrat friends, and I don't know, they're not like extreme leftists, but at times I sit here and I'm like... | ||
| What? Like, how do you—do you just like being lied to? | ||
| I mean, I don't understand the psychological phenomenon that goes in your head, because this is—with the whole Borders Are situation, and I mentioned this earlier, this is kind of the thing that goes unnoticed. | ||
| On one side, the Democrats are saying, most secure border ever. | ||
| We've done the best work at the border ever. | ||
| Forget about—I know it's in your head. | ||
| Oh, we know, 18 million across. | ||
| But— Okay, so Democrats on one side are saying it's the most secure border ever, but then they're saying Kamala Harris had nothing to do with it. | ||
| I know. I've been thinking about this all week. | ||
| So it's like, is it good? | ||
| You obviously want to separate Kamala Harris from the border because you know it's bad, but then over here you're telling us how great it is so you'd think you'd want her to own it. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? I've been thinking about it all week. | ||
| On one hand, they're telling you the border's fine, it's no problem, and they fixed it. | ||
| Because Biden, that was one of his talking points this past week, is guys, lower numbers now. | ||
| It was this morning. This morning he said that. | ||
| And then in the other hand, they're like, well, Kamala had nothing to do with it. | ||
| where I'm telling her that she's in charge or they have this excuse, well | ||
| she was just she was in charge of the diplomatic relations and she was in | ||
| charge of getting down to root causes. Okay so what'd she do with that? | ||
| Exactly. But then, you know, just to wheel everybody away from the black pill moment that we're having right now, the awesome thing about what you're saying is that this week, for the first time in my life, I've never seen this before, PolitiFact getting fact-checked on this. | ||
| I mean, Alex Jones, Trump, Elon Musk. | ||
| I can't think of three more important populists right now in this country, and we owe Elon a thank you for this one. | ||
| I've never seen PolitiFact get fact-checked. | ||
| Guys, it's over. | ||
| The curtain's been removed. | ||
| The average people saw Biden fail at that debate, and now they see PolitiFact being corrected. | ||
| Have you ever heard this before? | ||
| Glenn Greenwald claims a lot of these fact-checking websites that partnered with Facebook and Meta and YouTube are actually started by former intelligence officers. | ||
| Now, why is that? That doesn't... | ||
| That can't be, even though they were all working together. | ||
| And we even found that out, that they were demanding what be censored in this quote-unquote portal that they were communicating in. | ||
| Well, and, you know, here's the thing with Musk, too. | ||
| Right. And, you know, people have their issues with Musk, and that's fine. | ||
| But if you just... Freeing, formerly Twitter, freeing X to allow actual independent journalism, independent research and analysis to take place. | ||
| Real fact checkers. | ||
| Look, the community notes aren't perfect, but I mean... | ||
| It used to be if you were a left-winger and you lied, you would never get a fact check. | ||
| Never. You would never get a community note. | ||
| Now, all these people that are putting out the propaganda. | ||
| Harris never promoted the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| They put the community note right under it with the link to her tweet. | ||
| Isn't it awesome? And then Biden comes out, I don't know, what was it, a month or two ago, he said, don't trust anything on X. X is misinformation, malinformation, disinformation. | ||
| Where did he put out his resignation letter? | ||
| Well, he might not have known. | ||
| No, no, you're right. That's fair. | ||
| I don't know if he had anything to do with that. | ||
| Absolutely. One of my favorite politifacts. | ||
| He was in the Bakta tank or whatever. | ||
| He's like in an iron log. | ||
| They're like, Biden, tap twice if you resign. | ||
| And somebody's on the other side like, oh, that was twice. | ||
| He's resigning. He's in the same coffin they had Han Solo in. | ||
| One of my favorite PolitiFact moments, and I went back and looked at it today. | ||
| Love Ron Paul, one of my heroes. | ||
| Ron Paul famously said, back before 1913, we didn't have income tax. | ||
| PolitiFact said, mostly false. | ||
| Jim Webb, I don't know if you remember him, was a Democrat primary candidate in 2016. | ||
| Oh, they found it. No, that's a different one. | ||
| Jim Webb was a Democrat primary candidate in 2016. | ||
| Made the same point at a debate. | ||
| With Hillary and Bernie and Lincoln Chafee, whoever the candidates were. | ||
| PolitiFact goes, no, that's correct. | ||
| No, you can find those two things on PolitiFact's website. | ||
| How is it false when Ron Paul says it? | ||
| But it's true when a Democrat said it. | ||
| I mean, come on, dude. | ||
| I didn't know that. | ||
| Well, but again, it just shows you it's all propaganda. | ||
| And that's why I'm just sitting here. I'm like, so liberals like to be lied to. | ||
| 100%. And then they like to lie to you. | ||
| I mean, it's like that's the game they play. | ||
| But here's what's so dangerous about the Kamala thing, which frustrates me, is And again, this is why they want to separate her from the border. | ||
| It's like, you see these liberals celebrating her candidacy. | ||
| Why? Because she's a woman? | ||
| And because she has dance videos? | ||
| I mean, so what? | ||
| I don't give a damn. Like, she looks cool. | ||
| She feels cool. I feel like I have a margarita with her at the bar. | ||
| Well, what if her policies destroy your life? | ||
| What if her policies make you poor? | ||
| What if her policies starve you? | ||
| It's like they can't even make the—it's like they really do have this separation, and they cannot even comprehend that this individual has policies that are going to hurt you. | ||
| Do you think it bothers liberals that Kamala was telling us a month ago, Joe's fine? | ||
| And now... Doesn't bother him one bit. | ||
| I mean, how though? Because it's such an obvious lie. | ||
| I shouldn't say that, actually. | ||
| I take that back. Because, I don't know if you've seen, but MSNBC and CNN have been having these think tank conversations with liberals. | ||
| Yeah. And actually, all of them are upset. | ||
| CNN had a focus group that they aired, and they said, yeah, we're actually upset that we voted for Biden, and now we don't even get to vote for our nominee. | ||
| Yeah. Before that, they did a focus group of women in Wisconsin. | ||
| They said, well, how do you feel about Kamala? | ||
| She could be the first woman president. They were like, no, we don't like Kamala. | ||
| We'd never vote for Kamala. | ||
| So I don't know. I think that, you know, we tend to find the extreme left get represented when it comes to policy and then when it comes to some of these people that get a following on X. But I don't know. | ||
| I think that there's a lot of lefties out there that really are turned off by all of this. | ||
| I don't know if you saw the Dane Cook video. | ||
| So Dane Cook just did a very vanilla video just saying, hey guys, I'm not really looking for who you're voting for, but I'm just curious, where are you guys at politically? | ||
| These last two weeks have been crazy. | ||
| Just drop a comment. I'm just curious. | ||
| Let's find out where my fans are at politically. | ||
| Like, 50% of the comments were, I used to be Democrat, I'm voting Trump. | ||
| Yeah. So I think people really are just sick of it. | ||
| And like you said when we were talking earlier, after he took that bullet and stood up and said fight, I mean, it was kind of like... | ||
| I mean, even Zuckerberg was like, that's kind of badass. | ||
| Yeah. Dane's another one. | ||
| I think they tried to cancel him because he's 50 and his girlfriend's 25 or something like this. | ||
| Like, come on. That's what they go after him for? | ||
| That's what you're mad at him for. Of all the things... | ||
| I can't even... Do you think Obama likes Kamala? | ||
| No. I don't think any of them like each other, to be honest. | ||
| Because something that sometimes gets thrown out is... | ||
| Obama... | ||
| Kamala's the female Obama. | ||
| And then she giggles on TV and talks about the wheels on the bus. | ||
| And if you were Obama... | ||
| And diagram. Would you want her to be the female you? | ||
| The significance of time... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that time is actually insignificant... | |
| When you're thinking about the passage of time... | ||
| Alright, so this is interesting. | ||
| Now, this is normally the veterans call-in show, and we only do veterans guests. | ||
| We're making an exception today for Kenny Webster because of all the great work he's done for veterans with Wheelchairs for Warriors. | ||
| It was actually, you guys were doing your big Christmas push. | ||
| When I was in prison. And so that's actually how I listen to your show, Walton& Johnson, every morning. | ||
| I think you guys, what is it, 7 to 10? | ||
| Is that the right time? 5.30 to 10 a.m. | ||
| 5.30 to 10 a.m. | ||
| You never know when you're in solitary confinement. | ||
| You don't even know what time it is. | ||
| You're just kind of, you know. | ||
| And you know how radio works. | ||
| Not every affiliate carries the whole show. | ||
| That's true. That's true. | ||
| So this affiliate might have just been like 6 to 10. | ||
| Point is... This gentleman and his show, Walton& Johnson, was my main, if not only, source of news at that time when I was in solitary. | ||
| I had my little twist-up radio. | ||
| That's how you charged it, was you literally twisted it to give it battery. | ||
| Built for hurricanes and stuff like that. | ||
| Well, yes, it was. Or for prisoners, or built for prisoners, whatever. | ||
| Whatever the case is. So it was your show, Walton& Johnson, which is funny, informative. | ||
| I listened every day. | ||
| And then I get out, and I think I sent you a message. | ||
| I think I sent you a message that was like, hey, man, I'm great to see your Twitter account. | ||
| You kept me sane when I was in prison. | ||
| This is awesome. And now here you are. | ||
| Dude, career highlight being on InfoWars. | ||
| This, to me as a radio guy, I'm not often in front of a camera. | ||
| It's very awkward for me. We do parody and silly voices. | ||
| You get to come in looking disheveled, and you don't have to shave or anything. | ||
| Yeah, this is the first time I've worn pants in months. | ||
| Oh, and I mean, you know. I actually believe that from some of the things I've heard on your show. | ||
| But you're part of our research, because we're like a combination of comedy and real news and stuff. | ||
| But part of our show prep... | ||
| Is looking at what you do, what Alex does, what Paul Joseph Watson does, people affiliated with you guys. | ||
| You guys are so much farther ahead of everybody else right now on what happened in Butler, on what is going... | ||
| Scrubbing the internet, the Soviet-esque rewriting of Kamala's biography, and we're not journalists, we're just, you know, | ||
| comedians on the radio. | ||
| Have you had to deal with anything, because you guys are syndicated, have you guys had to deal with any of the | ||
| censorship problems? | ||
| Has anybody ever tried to get you off air? | ||
| It's a great question. | ||
| For years, people turned to the internet for less censored media. | ||
| And then when the COVID thing hit... | ||
| Suddenly it was old school media. | ||
| You guys are... You're doing new media and old media because we're on the radio right now, right? | ||
| Yes. So the only thing we can't do on our show is swear. | ||
| Whereas, like, on the Internet, on YouTube, you can't talk about the vaccines. | ||
| You can't talk about the election results. | ||
| You can't talk about Biden's broken brain. | ||
| I once got a flag on YouTube for predicting the results of the California gubernatorial runoff. | ||
| I said, I don't think Larry Elder's going to win. | ||
| And I woke up the next morning and YouTube said, you ought not post anything for 60 days. | ||
| And then Larry Elder didn't win. | ||
| Lo and behold... I was just predicting what I thought would happen. | ||
| Why can't you do that? Wow, that's a great question. | ||
| They didn't tell you. Why can't you cast doubt on the vaccines? | ||
| Well, we know why that is. | ||
| They've got to get their money. They've got to get their mandates. | ||
| Right. It's probably the same thing with California. | ||
| Yeah, why can't you make an election prediction? | ||
| If I knew the answer... | ||
| Soon you just can't cover an election. | ||
| No. That'll be what they do. | ||
| Maybe that's their move. You just can't cover an election. | ||
| Oh, Kamala Harris wins 50 states. | ||
| Hey, I kind of question that. Right. | ||
| Shut down. One of the things I think that keeps people from coming after us the way they come after you guys is that we claim to not be taken seriously. | ||
| You know, we try to we inject comedy and humor into what we're doing. | ||
| And so people look at us and like, ah, they're doing boner jokes about politicians. | ||
| It's fine. But it's the same news you guys are doing. | ||
| Well, that's what was so great for me, because when I'm saying when I can't leave my cell for four weeks, When I was put in general for the last week or so of my sentence, then you get access to a TV and you get to talk with some other people. | ||
| There's a little more room for trying to figure out what's going on. | ||
| Now, I didn't have access to a phone, but other people did. | ||
| So they're like, hey, did you hear this? This guy on the phone just told me. | ||
| But so I'm sitting in there, and you gotta, because I used to produce radio as well when I was younger. | ||
| Where at? St. Louis. | ||
| Okay, cool. KFNS, KXFN. And so, but I used to do, you guys do like segment bits. | ||
| Like we used to do the, like, you know, the Kill Mary bang bit and stuff like that. | ||
| You guys do some bits like that. | ||
| So it was like, it was great for me though, because I'm just sitting in the cell and I'm | ||
| laughing, but then I'm also getting information that I wouldn't be getting anywhere else. | ||
| Like when Speaker Johnson was finally chosen, it just, it was other news like that. | ||
| So I mean, you were my main source of news for at least four weeks. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, you were, you're goofy ass. | ||
| Thanks, man. It's a great honor. | ||
| That is very cool to me. | ||
| I think... I hate to compare us to the left, but if we were the left, I think that we're sort of like the Daily Show if you guys were CNN. And that's the worst comparison that's ever been made on this network. | ||
| But, you know, that's what it is, is we're doing parody and satire for people that get their news from Breitbart. | ||
| I used to write for Breitbart for years. | ||
| In fact, my mentor... | ||
| Is very good friends with your mentor. | ||
| Mancow Muller was the guy that got me into radio. | ||
| And I think he's been on this channel before many times. | ||
| He was on with Alex after Rush Limbaugh died. | ||
| That was the last time Mancow was on. | ||
| He did a great interview. It was about an hour long. | ||
| But yeah, he came on with Alex after Rush died. | ||
| That was the last time he was on. You, Rush, and Mancow... | ||
| All started your careers doing radio in Missouri. | ||
| That's true. Isn't that weird? That's true. | ||
| Yeah. It's a decent state. | ||
| And then you and I are also mutual friends with another guy from Missouri, Austin Peterson. | ||
| Yes, and he has a morning radio show now too. | ||
| Dana Lash started on St. | ||
| Louis Airwaves as well. | ||
| There's a lot of people that have come out of St. | ||
| Louis. Yeah, and people in the, you know, the coastal elitist write-off, the flyover state media people as being so irrelevant. | ||
| But everybody we just mentioned came from nothing and now has a huge audience and influences millions of people. | ||
| And, you know, like a lot of people don't even know who we are. | ||
| We have a million listeners a week. | ||
| Oh, I was stunned. I mean, because I heard, when I heard your show, I was like, this is, I mean, you guys do a great, your production level is as great as it gets. | ||
| I mean, I could tell you guys were pros. | ||
| Like, production level is as good as it gets when it comes to syndicated radio. | ||
| And so I'm like, wow, these guys must be huge. | ||
| How have I not heard of them before? | ||
| Yeah. The media doesn't, you know, the liberal media doesn't think we exist. | ||
| There have been many news stories written about us, and the headline is always, local radio personalities do blah, blah, blah. | ||
| Steve Johnson, the guy that created the show, our show's been around since 1983. | ||
| He is a genius. | ||
| He's like the Harry Shear or the Seth MacFarlane. | ||
| Is that your co-host? | ||
| Yeah. It does the voices. | ||
| Right, exactly. So a little behind the scenes here. | ||
| If you listen to the radio, one of the reasons we call our audience the 10 percenters is only one in 10 people is going to understand the humor, is going to understand the politics, is going to appreciate the delivery. | ||
| Steve is, I mean, just brilliant at making his voice sound like anything. | ||
| And he's doing characters that argue with each other and they have very intricate biographies. | ||
| We forget sometimes they have birthdays and family members. | ||
| Like, when you got out of prison, one of the things you and I talked about is like, yeah, Owen's out. | ||
| He wants to meet Kenny and Billy Ed. | ||
| And I was like, well, win-lose on that one. | ||
| Billy Ed's not really a real guy. | ||
| I was upset. I was like, hey. | ||
| But that's how I knew it was such a high-quality thing. | ||
| You can tell the genius of Steve just by the high production level. | ||
| But, you know, what you're talking about here is most... | ||
| How do I explain this? When you look at people that are going to vote for Trump, it's the people that they don't want you to talk about. | ||
| It's the average American that lives in what they call the flyover states and they just pretend like you don't have an opinion, you don't have a vote, you don't matter because you don't follow Hollywood and you don't follow the cool hip-hop culture and you don't go to the Olivia Rodrigo concert and so they just assume you don't matter. | ||
| That's actually the average American. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Yeah, I don't get invited to cocktail parties. | ||
| We do a lot of regional politics. | ||
| You guys do national stuff. | ||
| We're a regional show. | ||
| So we're big in New Orleans. | ||
| We're big in Baton Rouge, Houston. | ||
| Yeah, I picked you up out of Baton Rouge. | ||
| Right, Memphis. This is where our audience is at. | ||
| The local politicians in those towns know us. | ||
| They hate us. They've tried to make our life... | ||
| We notice when we go through the airport in these parts of the country... | ||
| We have trouble traveling in places where we're known and then not in places where we're not known. | ||
| It's like, I can't... Trouble traveling? | ||
| You know, it's like, that's weird. | ||
| We get randomly flagged at the Shreveport Airport, but not when we're in Denver. | ||
| You know what I mean? Okay. Sometimes it's a coincidence. | ||
| Sometimes it's not, Owen. You know what I mean? | ||
| It's rarely a coincidence. | ||
| Are you sure they're not stopping you because you forgot to put pants on? | ||
| I mean, that could be it. Apparently, that's a touchy thing. | ||
| That might be the one. But now, nudists are a protected class. | ||
| That's true. Conservatives are not. | ||
| Just say you're a tranny like the new Olympic promoters. | ||
| How about that, dude? | ||
| They're really leaning into the anti-Christian stuff. | ||
| People are already defending this on social media. | ||
| A transgender, a transvestite carried the Olympic torch. | ||
| Is that what that was? Because I saw him put it on the screen. | ||
| I didn't see that. The final torch was a tranny? | ||
| I don't know what order it came in, because I've been traveling all day. | ||
| I did another TV show yesterday, your buddy Alex Stein. | ||
| Yeah, I was with Sarah Gonzalez, Alex Stein. | ||
| They told me to tell you hi. They're all friends and fans. | ||
| I don't know if your audience knows that. | ||
| That's nice of them. And I guess Alex was just on their show, on one of their channels, one of their shows. | ||
| So the last Olympic torchbearer was a transgender. | ||
| But see, here's what's so crazy about it, and you mentioned this. | ||
| It's like... This isn't just something where they kind of throw... | ||
| It's so weird, dude. | ||
| Oh my gosh. This is so demonic and gross. | ||
| I'm surprised that wasn't used as a, well... | ||
| You know what? We'll just... | ||
| Yeah, I know. We know what you're saying. | ||
| No, we know. With the flame. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With the flame. It's the... | |
| I'd be like, I'm not going to touch that. | ||
| I'm not touching that. The joke writes itself. | ||
| Go ahead, people, in the comments section. | ||
| There's another one. There's a bearded lady. | ||
| And then they did a thing with the Last Supper. | ||
| Yeah, that's where I was going to go. | ||
| But that's what I'm saying. This isn't like some amalgamation. | ||
| It's like, oh, it just happens to look like... | ||
| No, they sat down and they said, how can we offend Christians? | ||
| How can we blaspheme the Last Supper? | ||
| Like, how can we write this in and then make it something that's our own? | ||
| Right. And you know, to me, Owen, I'm not offended easily. | ||
| I watch, I've seen Taliban beheading videos and, you know, cartel shootouts and stuff like that. | ||
| I've been shocked before. | ||
| It doesn't take much to shock me. | ||
| The reason this bothers me, it's not that it's supposed to be insulting to me because you can't hurt my feelings. | ||
| Well, and you're based out of Houston, right? | ||
| Right. It's just that I understand. | ||
| Some craziness in Houston. Nuts. | ||
| It's human trafficking capital of America. | ||
| The reason this concerns me is I know what the intended consequences are. | ||
| The intended consequence is to normalize pedophilia. | ||
| It's to normalize child grooming. | ||
| It's to normalize sexualizing our kids. | ||
| So there's the bearded... | ||
| Like, what is the point of this? | ||
| Is this what French values are? | ||
| I don't know. I don't think so. | ||
| Apparently... Maybe? I don't know. | ||
| Right. And you know what else is great about this? | ||
| Are there a bunch of trannies in France? | ||
| I've never... I didn't know that. | ||
| You know... They found every single one is what they did. | ||
| I gotta think there's more, Owen. | ||
| We're gonna find every single transgender individual in France and we're gonna make him a part of this Olympic opening ceremony. | ||
| But you know, I also try to see the silver lining. | ||
| I'm an optimist. One of the other torchbearers was newcomer Trump supporter Snoop Dogg. | ||
| Oh, really? In France? | ||
| Yeah, apparently he was part of it, yeah. | ||
| Well, he might be the one that's going to take the torch and bring it to L.A. when they come here in, I think it's 2026. | ||
| I haven't watched any of it. | ||
| And it's not that it's beneath me. | ||
| I've just had a busy week doing stuff. | ||
| Because I do get into watching this stuff. | ||
| I do like this stuff. | ||
| I like watching people who are great at what they do compete. | ||
| I do. I like watching people that have mastered their craft. | ||
| Whether it's an athlete or a musician, do you think he's high? | ||
| How did Snoop Dogg, like, how much willpower did it take for him to not make a joke that he's smoking a joint? | ||
| Oh, yes! | ||
| That's even better than the tranny joke. | ||
| Because he had to think of it. | ||
| I mean, no offense to Snoop Dogg. | ||
| Well, it would almost be just like a reaction. | ||
| He's a three-hit wonder, right? | ||
| Like, he raps, he smokes weed, and then what else does he do? | ||
| He carries the Olympic torch. | ||
| And he hangs out with Martha Stewart. | ||
| I'm surprised it wasn't even just a muscle memory. | ||
| Like, he just got it and just immediately, oh, wait, oh, this isn't a... | ||
| But no, so the Olympics come here 2026, and then they actually, the United States was just awarded the 2032 Olympics, I think, in Salt Lake, too. | ||
| I think it was 2032. And I see this, and I'm like, please, don't look at what the French did for this opening ceremony and think, we've got to go further. | ||
| Please. Please. I don't know. | ||
| But it's in LA. So, I mean, who knows? | ||
| Gavin Newsom might, you know, get up there and bring out the Dodgers trannies. | ||
| You always wonder if these cultural phenomenons are going to red pill people. | ||
| And I'll give you an example that everybody in your audience probably remembers. | ||
| We all know when the women's gymnastics team got raped by the doctor. | ||
| Like, really sick, disgusting stuff. | ||
| They covered it up. And then the less covered, I mean, it was a blip on the newsreel, was all these female Olympic gymnastic stars coming out and saying, the FBI covered this up. | ||
| Now, as conservatives and libertarians and populists and nationalists that watch this show, who watching this show right now doesn't hate the FBI? Well, there was a very fascinating moment not that long ago, between now and the last Olympics, where every one of these girls that we're going to watch over the next couple weeks got in front of cameras and said, hey... You know, without saying it, conservatives were right about the FBI. My question for you, Owen, do you think America remembers that? | ||
| No, and this is the incredible power that the mainstream media has, that I think they're starting to lose. | ||
| They're not, it hasn't been completely lost yet. | ||
| It's starting to slip, right? | ||
| It's starting to slip through their fingertips, though, and they know it, and that's why Internet censorship is so important. | ||
| Ugh, look at this guy, no chin. | ||
| Oh, my God. If they don't, they've had the power in the past, not as much anymore, but they've had the power in the past where if they don't cover something, it doesn't happen. | ||
| Right. It doesn't exist. | ||
| That's it. And it's, you know, you could call it Orwellian or Soviet-esque. | ||
| So many examples this week. | ||
| Well, Kamala isn't the borders are. | ||
| How about that? Isn't that amazing? | ||
| And it's not hard to find this stuff. | ||
| CNN reported on it. | ||
| It's been mentioned. Oh, it's everywhere. | ||
| It's been mentioned in congressional documents. | ||
| Kamala Harris didn't promote the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| There's a literal tweet. | ||
| She put the link out and said, donate. | ||
| Right. Or how about her bailing out the rioters? | ||
| It's in the link. Because now they're saying that never happened. | ||
| Like, no, it happened. It happened and they bragged about it. | ||
| I just, you know, it's so strange. | ||
| And I have, I'm sure you do too. | ||
| I have liberal friends, leftist friends, Democrat friends. | ||
| And I don't know, they're not like extreme leftists, but at times I sit here and I'm like, what? | ||
| Like, how do you, do you just like being lied to? | ||
| I mean, I don't understand the psychological phenomenon that goes in your head. | ||
| Because this is, with the whole Borders Are situation, and I mentioned this earlier, this is kind of the thing that goes unnoticed. | ||
| On one side, the Democrats are saying, most secure border ever. | ||
| We've done the best work at the border ever. | ||
| Forget about, I know it's in your head. | ||
| Oh, we know, 18 million across. | ||
| But... Okay, so Democrats on one side are saying it's the most secure border ever, but then they're saying Kamala Harris had nothing to do with it. | ||
| I know. I've been thinking about this all week. | ||
| So it's like, is it good? | ||
| You obviously want to separate Kamala Harris from the border because you know it's bad, but then over here you're telling us how great it is so you'd think you'd want her to own it. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? I've been thinking about it all week. | ||
| On one hand, they're telling you the border's fine, it's no problem, and they fixed it. | ||
| Because Biden, that was one of his talking points this past week, is guys, lower numbers now. | ||
| It was this morning. This morning he said that. | ||
| And then on the other hand, they're like, well, Kamala had nothing to do with it. | ||
| where I'm telling her that she's in charge or they have this excuse, well | ||
| she was just, she was in charge of the diplomatic relations and she was in | ||
| charge of getting down to root causes. Okay so what'd she do with that? | ||
| Exactly. But then, you know, just to wheel everybody away from the black pill moment that we're having right now, the awesome thing about what you're saying is that this week, for the first time in my life, I've never seen this before, PolitiFact getting fact-checked on this. | ||
| I mean, Alex Jones, Trump, Elon Musk. | ||
| I can't think of three more important populists right now in this country. | ||
| And... We owe Elon a thank you for this one. | ||
| I've never seen PolitiFact get fact-checked. | ||
| Guys, it's over. | ||
| The curtain's been removed. | ||
| The average people saw Biden fail at that debate, and now they see PolitiFact being corrected. | ||
| Have you ever heard this before? | ||
| Glenn Greenwald claims a lot of these fact-checking websites that partnered with Facebook and Meta and YouTube are actually started by former intelligence officers. | ||
| Now, why is that? That can't be, even though they were all working together and And we even found that out, that they were demanding what be censored in this quote-unquote portal that they were communicating in. | ||
| Well, and, you know, here's the thing with Musk, too. | ||
| Right. And, you know, people have their issues with Musk, and that's fine. | ||
| But if you look at the one issue that you just brought up, freeing, formerly Twitter, freeing X to allow actual independent journalism, independent research and analysis to take place, real fact-checkers. | ||
| Look, the community notes aren't perfect, but, I mean... | ||
| It used to be if you were a left-winger and you lied, you would never get a fact check. | ||
| Never. You would never get a community note. | ||
| Now, all these people that are putting out the propaganda, Harris never promoted the Minnesota Freedom Fund. | ||
| They put the community note right under it with the link to her tweet. | ||
| Isn't it awesome? And then Biden comes out, I don't know, what was it, a month or two ago, he said, don't trust anything on X. X is misinformation, malinformation, disinformation. | ||
| Where did he put out his resignation letter? | ||
| Well, he might not have known. | ||
| No, no, you're right. That's fair. | ||
| I don't know if he had anything to do with that. | ||
| Absolutely. One of my favorite politifacts... | ||
| He was in the Bakta tank or whatever. | ||
| One of my favorite... He's like in an iron log. | ||
| They're like... Biden, tap twice if you resign. | ||
| And somebody's on the other side like... | ||
| Oh, that was twice. He's resigning. | ||
| He's in the same coffin they had Han Solo in. | ||
| One of my favorite PolitiFact moments, and I went back and looked at it today, love Ron Paul, one of my heroes. | ||
| Ron Paul famously said, back before 1913, we didn't have income tax. | ||
| PolitiFact said, mostly false. | ||
| Jim Webb, I don't know if you remember him, was a Democrat primary candidate in 2016. | ||
| Oh, they found it. No, that's a different one. | ||
| Jim Webb was a Democrat primary candidate in 2016. | ||
| Made the same point at a debate with Hillary and Bernie and Lincoln Chafee, whoever the candidates were. | ||
| PolitiFact goes, no, that's correct. | ||
| Now, you can find those two things on PolitiFact's website. | ||
| How is it false when Ron Paul says it, but it's true when a Democrat said it? | ||
| I mean, come on, dude. | ||
| I didn't know that. Well, but again, it just shows you it's all propaganda. | ||
| And that's why I'm just sitting here. I'm like, so liberals like to be lied to. | ||
| 100%. And then they like to lie to you. | ||
| I mean, it's like that's the game they play. | ||
| But here's what's so dangerous about the Kamala thing, which frustrates me is, and again, this is why they want to separate her from the border. | ||
| It's like you see these liberals celebrating her candidacy. | ||
| Why? Because she's a woman? | ||
| And because she has dance videos? | ||
| I mean, so what? | ||
| I don't give a damn. Like, she looks cool. | ||
| She feels cool. I feel like I have a margarita with her at the bar. | ||
| Well, what if her policies destroy your life? | ||
| What if her policies make you poor? | ||
| What if her policies starve you? | ||
| It's like they can't even make the... | ||
| It's like they really do have this separation and they cannot even comprehend that this individual has policies that are going to hurt you. | ||
| Do you think it bothers liberals that Kamala was telling us a month ago, Joe's fine? | ||
| And now... | ||
| Doesn't bother him one bit. I mean, how though? | ||
| Because it's such an obvious lie. | ||
| I shouldn't say that, actually. | ||
| I take that back. Because, I don't know if you've seen, but MSNBC and CNN have been having these think tank conversations with liberals. | ||
| Yeah. And actually, all of them are upset. | ||
| CNN had a focus group that they aired and they said, yeah, we're actually upset that we voted for Biden and now we don't even get to vote for our nominee. | ||
| Yeah. Before that, they did a focus group of women in Wisconsin. | ||
| They said, well, how do you feel about Kamala? | ||
| She could be the first woman president. They were like, no, we don't like Kamala. | ||
| We'd never vote for Kamala. | ||
| So I don't know. I think that, you know, we tend to find the extreme left get represented when it comes to policy and then when it comes to some of these people that get a following on X. But I don't know. | ||
| I think that there's a lot of lefties out there that really are turned off by all of this. | ||
| I don't know if you saw the Dane Cook video. | ||
| So Dane Cook just did a very vanilla video just saying, hey guys, I'm not really looking for who you're voting for, but I'm just curious, where are you guys at politically? | ||
| These last two weeks have been crazy. | ||
| Just drop a comment. I'm just curious. | ||
| Let's find out where my fans are at politically. | ||
| Like, 50% of the comments were, I used to be Democrat, I'm voting Trump. | ||
| Yeah. So I think people really are just sick of it. | ||
| And like you said when we were talking earlier, after he took that bullet and stood up and said fight, I mean, it was kind of like, I mean, even Zuckerberg was like, that's kind of badass. | ||
| Yeah. Dane's another one. | ||
| I think they tried to cancel him because he's 50 and his girlfriend's 25 or something like this. | ||
| Like, come on. That's what they go after him for? | ||
| That's what you're mad at him for, right? | ||
| Of all the things... | ||
| Do you think Obama likes Kamala? | ||
| No. I don't think any of them like each other, to be honest. | ||
| Because something that sometimes gets thrown out is, Kamala is the female Obama, and then she giggles on TV and talks about the wheels on the bus. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you were Obama, would you want her to be the female you? | |
| The significance of time is that time is actually insignificant. | ||
| When you're thinking about the passage of time... | ||
| This is a make it or break it moment, so I need people to connect those synapses in their brain for you to make a decision. | ||
| If you don't support Infowars, we will be shut down. | ||
| And people say, well, they're constantly trying to shut you down. | ||
| How are you still in the air? God. | ||
| But God works through people. | ||
| So, we're in a paradox here where the judge says we're open for three more months. | ||
| If we're able to get a buyer out of the law, they won't be able to shut us down. | ||
| I'll just work with somebody else. And that's coming. | ||
| That's got to be set up. But in the meantime, if people believe the news that we're being shut down everywhere, which they tried to do and failed, by that foregone conclusion, we're shut down. | ||
| And under the last federal bankruptcy manager who would not reorder product and killed all our advertising, who is positioning us to be shut down and tried to shut us down, We caught him. | ||
| The judge caught him and fired him. | ||
| We're almost sold out of all the products. | ||
| All right? But we have a lot of great products that are still in stock. | ||
| Limited supplies. So I need you to go to InfowarStore.com. | ||
| If we just had a donation button, maybe we should just do that. | ||
| You're fighting for freedom in a key election, battling the globalists. | ||
| We need support. But we want a long-term relationship with you. | ||
| We want to be symbiotic. | ||
| We want you to get great products you like and deliver to you quickly and enjoy them and have them empower you and make your life better so you love them and you keep getting them. | ||
| We want a relationship. So there's the Infowars MD line that I don't talk about enough that is all the highest quality. | ||
| Whether it's turmeric, or whether it's natural sleep aid, or whether it's saw palmetto, or other compounds that are great for your prostate, also great for women's breasts. | ||
| It affects the same type of tissues that have those hormonal fluctuations. | ||
| I'm not a doctor, but I read the literature. | ||
| You need to go to InfoWarsStore.com and go to the sections that have the whole line, over a dozen products, InfoWarsMD. | ||
| We've got Ashwagandha Gummy. | ||
| Relaxes you, makes you feel really relaxed with no downer feeling. | ||
| Amazing. An incredible product. | ||
| Good night's sleep. We have a lot of great sleep aids. | ||
| This one's excellent. They're all different formulas. | ||
| People love it. Good night's sleep. | ||
| InfowarsMD. Ashwagandha with black pepper, which relaxes you and makes you lose weight. | ||
| These are all concentrates. Joint Relief Max. | ||
| Works really well. Great pain relief. | ||
| Huge bottle of it. Jam-packed. | ||
| It's there. Joint Relief Max. | ||
| InfoWarsMD. Prostate support. | ||
| I already mentioned that. This is just a top formula. | ||
| Super high quality. Organic. | ||
| Nerve Renew. Amazing. | ||
| To get your nerves not to kill pain, but to get your nerves healthy. | ||
| Nitric Boost. Vitamin Rural Fusion about to sell out. | ||
| About to sell out. Real Red Pill Plus. | ||
| And something I never talk about and should talk about more. | ||
| Probiotic Fiber. A super high-end product at a low price at InfoWarsStore.com. |
Export Selection