Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 17, 2024 - War Room - Owen Shroyer

02:27:10

Dubai Flooding Is Not Climate Change Chemtrail Special Report

Source

Participants

Main voices

alex jones

12:11

augustus doricko

32:38

rob dew

51:16

Appearances

dr peter mccullough

02:14

greg reese

03:38

john brennan

01:25

katherine maher

02:10

rob agueros

01:39

Clips

christopher a wray

00:32

jon bowne

00:58

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		The silent majority is no longer silent.
		This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
		Please stand by for further details.
		We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
christopher a wray ▲ ● ▼		An absolutely indispensable tool.
		That Congress can give us in our fight against foreign adversaries is the reauthorization of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
		It is critical in securing our nation, and we are in crunch time with our 702 authority set to expire next week.
		So let me be clear.
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		Failure to reauthorize 702 Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act was enacted to make it easier for the government to address foreign terrorist threats.
		Targeting Americans is prohibited, but intelligence agencies have used Section 702 to spy on hundreds of thousands of Americans every year.
		And this week, it's looking to get a lot worse.
		Elizabeth Goitin of the Liberty and National Security Program at the Brennan Center for Justice does a great job of explaining it and sounding the alarm.
		Buried in the Section 702 reauthorization bill passed by the House on Friday is the biggest expansion of domestic surveillance since the Patriot Act.
		Under current law, the government can compel electronic communications service providers that have direct access to communications to assist the NSA in conducting Section 702 surveillance.
		Companies like Verizon and Google must turn over the communications of targets, which officially must be foreigners overseas.
		But this has been abused to spy on Americans.
		By changing the definition of electronic communications surveillance provider, an amendment offered by House Intel committee leaders and passed by the House vastly expands the universe of entities that can be compelled to assist the NSA. If the bill becomes law, any company or individual that provides any service whatsoever may be forced to assist in NSA surveillance, as long as they have access to equipment on which communications are transmitted or stored.
		When the amendment was first unveiled, civil liberties advocates noted that the provision would encompass hotels, libraries, and coffee shops, and so they were excluded.
		But the vast majority of U.S. businesses remain fair game, including barber shops, laundromats, fitness centers, hardware stores, and any small business that provides Wi-Fi to their customers via routers.
		It also includes commercial landlords that rent out offices, which would target journalists, lawyers, financial advisors, healthcare providers, and anyone renting commercial office space.
		The amendment even includes service providers who come into our homes, such as house cleaners, plumbers, and IT service providers.
		All of whom could be forced to serve as surrogate spies and be required to give the NSA direct access.
		And none of them would be allowed to tell anyone.
		They would be under a gag order and would face heavy penalties if they failed to comply.
		Having wholesale access to domestic communications, the NSA would then be on the honor system to retain only the communications of approved foreign targets.
		And we know from past experience that they cannot be trusted to do this.
		The Senate is scheduled to vote on the bill this week.
		Section 702 expires on April 19th.
		But the Biden administration has obtained FISA court approval to continue Section 702 surveillance until April of 2025.
		Call your senators now and tell them to block the everyone is a spy surveillance bill.
		Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
unidentified		Attacked and threatened.
unidentified		Because we are effective.
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		The great awakening is here.
greg reese ▲ ● ▼		Go to band.video.
unidentified		Download the videos and share.
		Support the information war at infowarstore.com.
		and never give up the fight.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Well, look at that. Trying to tweet something as we go live and it doesn't like it.
		I wonder if that's because it's got the Infowars.com forward slash show link.
		Hmm. Or maybe X doesn't want me covering chemtrails.
		Or Trump in Harlem. Or more.
		Hmm. Let's try this.
		Let's see if they'll let us do old band.video.
		Go to band. This will be interesting.
		Live. Share.
		Copy the link. This is all interesting, the way this semi-censorship works.
		Here we go. Let's see if that'll post.
		Boom! That post was sent.
		So, today, it's InfoWars.com forward slash show.
		Thank you. I'm just sitting down.
		It's been quite a day getting all this news ready.
		I'm your host, Rob Dew.
		Thanks for joining me. Got a little cough drop in, so I may be hitting that cough button here and there.
		But let's go first.
		I just want to contrast something.
		Yesterday, President Trump was in a bodega In Harlem.
		Okay, Harlem is like the quintessential center of black culture in New York City.
		And I've been there.
		Definitely a lot of black people.
		Definitely a lot of minorities. Here's how they treated President Trump.
		Here's that video. I love you, Trump!
unidentified		I love you, Trump!
unidentified		We love Trump! We love Trump! We love Trump!
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Okay, now, here we have breaking.
		Today, in another normal Democrat stronghold, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Biden makes a visit to the U.S. Steel Building.
		I think it looks like a castle, if you look at that U.S. Steel Building.
		I used to live in Pittsburgh, and the U.S. Steel Building is very prominent, and I believe it looks like a castle.
		But here's how Biden was treated.
		Let's see the difference. See if you can spot the difference here.
		Now, what's interesting, guys, go to a still frame and just look at the signs.
		They're definitely professionally printed.
		So somebody's backing this.
		There's the U.S. Steel Building.
		Somebody's backing this.
		You can see more spending, more red tape, higher prices, Bidenomics.
		Bidenomics is bad economics, is what they're saying.
		Oh, there it is, yeah. Bidenomics is bad, and then there's a Bidenomics, and then there's some Palestinian flags, and what they were chanting was, genocide, Joe has got to go.
		Big difference in the two.
		There's also a big difference in the way the Biden camps and the Trump camps say the word bodega.
		So we're going to play this video that shows Trump saying it, and then Dr.
		Jill Biden, who I think is an educator.
unidentified		So here's the difference.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Let's rewind and let's hear Trump and Jill again.
unidentified		That the diversity of this community, as distinct as the Bogotas of the Bronx, as beautiful as the blossoms of Miami, and as unique as the breakfast tacos here in San Antonio.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, when she called everybody tacos.
		Trump didn't call anybody tacos.
		He went to the bodega.
		In Harlem. And that was the spot where the guy was getting railroaded because he defended himself.
		A criminal comes in. Oh, you defend yourself against a criminal.
		Oh, you have to go to jail.
		You have to get sent to the clink.
		Now let's look at this video.
		This is Dominic Carter from the Dominic Carter Show.
		I imagine he's a Democrat.
		I've never heard of this guy. WABCradio.com.
		And he's talking about, he's giving a warning to the Democrats.
		He's saying, you guys got to watch out.
		If Trump's getting this kind of reception in Harlem, you guys better watch out.
unidentified		Here it is. Democrats, you better wake up, and you better wake up fast.
		When Trump comes to the heart of black America, to Harlem, and is receiving a warm welcome, almost a hero's welcome, the alarm bells are going off.
		That you're about to lose the election.
		When Trump can walk onto your base with no problem at all and be embraced by the community, that's a big problem if you are a Democrat.
		The White House, you better wake up.
		All those million-dollar consultants, you better put them to work.
		Don't take your base for granted.
		You're already bleeding support with your base of African Americans and Latinos.
		And Trump can smell the blood in the water and he says, I'm bringing the fight to you.
		I'm going to black America.
		I'm coming. There you go.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		There he is shaking hands with the NYPD. So, a tale of two worlds, and yet the polls want you to believe that these guys are neck and neck.
		They want you to believe that it's so close, you gotta keep spending more ad revenue money, because that's all they're worried about, is their ads.
		So, of course, the polls that they run are gonna show these guys neck and neck.
		There's Biden We have on our big screen over here, Biden coming out of his home, you know, groping a couple kids.
		That's his thing, groping kids.
		And I think there's a video of Biden floating around somewhere where he's talking about when he goes somewhere, there's little kids flipping him off.
		And, you know, nobody likes you, Joe.
		You were forced in.
		You were shoehorned in with a fake election.
		And I've got some fake election news coming up.
		I'll probably get after the break.
		I'll show you that. And then I got a good quote from the CEO of NPR, the new CEO, and how she wants to treat you.
		But I'm going to play this, guys.
		Get this one queued up.
		It's Alex Jones.
		I put this up on X yesterday.
		And it's Alex from Masters of Terror.
		So this is literally 20 years old.
		He made this film in 2004.
		I'm looking for it on the chart.
		You got it? Okay. We'll go to that in just a little bit.
		I think it's 1144, so I'll try to time it good.
		But let's look at this article from Stephen A. Smith.
		Get Trump lawfare is proof Democrats scared can't beat him on the issues.
		Stephen A. Smith, who to me seems to be like, you know, Misinformed leftist, most of the time, calls to get Trump lawfare a bunch of crowded cowards.
		What you are doing is showing you're scared you can't beat him on the issues.
		Everything you do is showing me you can't beat him.
		And I think that's what Charlie Kirk put out.
		All you're doing is showing that you're scared and it's a political campaign.
		That's what he keeps saying. It's a political campaign against me.
		That's what he keeps saying. They can't beat me at the polls.
		This is the only way they could do it.
		And if you don't put him in jail, And he goes from being the presumptive GOP nominee to the official GOP nominee.
		And then he goes to the polls, even though he was going to whine about winning and it's rigged again.
		You've given him more fodder for that argument, which means we'll never have peace in the country because tens of millions of Americans see what extent the other side is willing to go through just to keep him out of office because they can't beat him on their own merits.
		And they're going to say, hey, You trump this up against him again and we'll have no peace when all you gotta do is figure out a way to beat him on the issues.
		That's a Stephen A. Smith clip.
		You can find him on ESPN usually whining about...
		I don't know if he promotes transgender athletes or not.
		He seems to stay lukewarm on it.
		But I've got this tweet.
		This is old, but I'm going to pull this out later after the break.
		And it's undeniable proof out of Georgia that Dominion voting is rigging United States elections.
		And it was confirmed with a hand count.
		And it was like thousands off.
		It wasn't even close.
		And they had the lady in third place actually won.
		So we'll play that.
		The guys who put that together, it seemed like it was part of a documentary.
		It's very concise. So we'll play that.
		I want to get to this, which is Alex Jones covering basically everything we're going to talk about later today.
		Well, not everything, but a lot of it.
		The border, cancer, viruses and vaccines, pre-crime, illegals being recruited into the army for citizenship.
		You see all these people keep talking about the fighting age males that keep showing up.
		But why is that? Well, they're going to put them in the army.
		Or Marines or Air Force or wherever they need to go.
		Coast Guard, National Guard.
		They're going to put these guys in there and they're going to work for their citizenship.
		That's what this is all about.
		It's all about working for your citizenship.
		Well, they were talking about this 20 years ago.
		Alex Jones is covering it.
		This film he made in 2004 called Masters of Terror is an old school, I would say, kind of like a...
		Him sitting down at AXS. This would be like watching Alex Jones on AXS. I used to come home actually at night, flip on the TV, and 60% of the time you'd find Alex Jones.
	Ranting about all this stuff.
	So it's really good. We're going to go to this now.
	This is Alex Jones covering cancer, viruses, and vaccines, implantable microchips, DARPA pre-crime, what the future doesn't need, the future doesn't need us, and illegal immigrants being recruited into the Army for citizenship.
	All foretold 20 years ago.
	Why weren't you listening then?
	But you're listening now.
	You're watching The War Room. I'm your host, Rob Dew.
	We'll be right back. Here it is.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		I also wanted to talk just to warn you about the hundreds of reports confirming dozens of vaccines full of cancer viruses.
		That's why cancer is up by 400%.
		This is out of the National Post of Canada.
		Cancer linked to vaccine fouled by monkey virus.
		Vaccine cancer scare.
		This out of the New York Post.
		Again, the UN says they want to control our populations.
		DNA test links autism to measles, mumps, and rubella.
		They have found it in autistic children, almost all autistic children.
		Autism was unheard of before the MMR shot.
		Now they've found this antibody, a hormone just so happens to be in the shot, that attacks the cerebral cortex.
		Normally it just causes a lowering of IQ in the child.
		But the government wants a total loss of IQ. Ladies and gentlemen.
		DNA test links autism to MMR. This is out of the Sunday Herald.
		Scotland on Sunday.
		Blood tests link MMR to autism.
		Hundreds of top reports, ladies and gentlemen, from all over the world.
		Here's another one. Virus engineered a sterilized pest.
		Washington Times. The reason I cover this article from August is because years ago I saw articles about the tetanus shots being used to sterilize third world women.
		And now you look at our people in the West, no matter what color they are, they're losing their fertility.
		75% sperm counts down, women way down, fertility way down.
		Look at this. Look at this again.
		Virus engineered to sterilize pests.
		Exactly how the UN got caught doing it, they're now doing it for other mammals.
		And they see us as pests.
		Vaccinations from Austin clinics could be bad.
		This is just where I live. This stuff is everywhere, folks.
		It's out of the Houston Chronicle.
		There's no place to hide.
		Amazing story. They now have ultrasonic radar that can look through your walls and look at the ventricles of your heart.
		Wired Magazine. Five years ago, I saw reports of this.
		They're giving them to police departments.
		The older versions that just see a black and white image of you in your home.
		Crisp and clean image.
		Folks, this is a violation of every canon of a free society.
		And since they've gotten all these technologies, have we been safe?
		No, we've been attacked by terrorists.
		Ed's open Total Tech Spy System, also from Wired News.
		They call it the Total Information Awareness Network, and their symbol is the all-seeing eye of the Illuminati, right off of DARPA's own website.
		Delaware police compiled database of future suspects.
		I interviewed the city council member.
		They're compiling names of the Kiwanis Club, of the Second Amendment groups.
		It came out in Denver, Colorado, the Denver Post, 3,000 plus People's names, 300 plus groups, they had photos, they had files on Kiwanis, NRA, liberal preachers, conservative preachers, on everybody. They won't control our borders, but they got files on the American people, because we're the cattle, we're the producers.
		I'm not trying to scare you here, folks.
		It's gone so far, we got to tell the truth.
		Delaware police database on future subjects, people who've never committed crimes.
		Associated Press.
		Pre-crime. U.S. Report for Tales of Brave New World.
		I talked to these folks.
		U.S. National Science Foundation says we will all be implanted with microchips in our brains in the next 20 years.
		Same thing the Air Force and Federation of American Scientists said.
		This from the Sydney Morning Herald.
		It says we will all have chips put in our heads.
		This is the U.S. government's plan.
		They've done everything they said they'd do.
		Now, they blow up cities with nukes, which they've said is going to happen.
		They claim it's some shadowy, you know, Goldstein enemy right out of 1984.
		Bill Joy, co-owner of Sun Microsystems, author of the Java language, worth about 8 billion bucks.
		Wired Magazine says the elite plans to kill us, 80% of us, so they have access to live extension technologies.
		Why the future doesn't need us.
		Why humans are an endangered species.
		Again, Bill Joy, multi-billionaire, having a pang of conscience, telling you they plan to kill you.
		Ted Turner, Prince Philip, they've all said it.
		I put that in my other films.
	A certain court of appeals rules that they can have unlimited forced drugging of people that haven't even been charged for unlimited period of times to prepare you to be charged.
	And they've been grabbing in test cases middle class doctors and others and forced drugging them.
	This put out by the American Association of Physicians and Surgeons.
	City to tax rainwater from North Carolina to Washington State.
	Cities are now saying they're going to tax you for the use of rainwater with meters.
	I'm not kidding.
	Mainstream news. Just talk about total tyranny.
	Talk about Big Brother, folks.
	This is it. Did you ever think you'd see them on the nightly news saying you need to take implantable microchips in your brain?
	Well, they're now doing it.
	Will military enforce domestic law?
	Bush Ridge look at suspending 1878 Posse Comitatus Act.
	And they've been all over the news saying that.
	Again, we have 700,000 police.
	Why do we need military? Because they are a force that takes on the general public.
	They are not a force that goes out and fights terrorists.
	Administration molds whether to give military more power within U.S. borders.
	Associated Press. Now again, I made films about this in 97, 98, 99, 2001.
	I warned you. I said terrorism was coming.
	They were going to spring these troops on us.
	Now they're getting rid of posse commentators.
	Meanwhile, there's thousands less border patrol agents on the southern border because the government is cutting their pay and then raising the pay for other federal positions on purpose.
	Our borders are a sieve.
	Immigration bill offers felons a second chance.
	And not just aggravated felons, Evicted of murder, rape, robbery, pornography, child pornography, arson.
	They want them to come here as illegal aliens and to become members of the military.
	I mean, yes, you're not living in the twilight zone.
	This stuff is really happening.
	It says legal aliens, but you read in the bill, it's illegal aliens too.
	So if you're a felon, they want you.
	Again, Hitler wanted criminals working for him.
	So did Stalin. And the British brought in foreign troops, Hessians.
	Why? Because they'll shoot at people, folks.
	Foreigners find military fast track to citizenship.
	Again, more on that.
	Here's a key story. The Globe and Mail.
	Landry sees more fluid Canadian-US border.
	Pan American Union under NORTHCOM actually says it.
	Here's the Toronto Star.
	Primers, governors promote open border.
	North America will lose out to Europe in a new global economy unless Canada and United States open their borders and create a Pan American Union.
	Here's the Globe and Mail.
	Canada-US near troop deal.
	Washington and Ottawa are close to a deal allowing U.S. soldiers to cross the border and operate on Canadian soil in the event of a terrorist attack.
	The proposal, revealed by Defense Minister John McCollum yesterday, would likewise let Canadian troops take part in the anti-terror operations south on the border.
	It says Canadians are worried about losing their sovereignty.
	Yeah, Americans don't even know about this.
	The Army War College report calls for Mexican and Canadian troops to, quote, patrol America and deal with American terrorists.
	And now they've got children's video games that the Pentagon puts out where you kill American militia members.
	San Diego, folks.
	Associated Press.
	Army seeks recruits through soldier video games.
	Who do you fight in the game?
	You fight the American militia.
	Terrorist. American militia.
	You see that? The guys with, you know, a feed hat on.
	You know, there's a country boy. Sitting there defending America, so he's evil.
	And guess who the good guys are?
	SAS, United Kingdom, GSG9, Germany, GIGN, France.
	Here on the front, who are the best guys in the game?
	Spitsnats, Russian.
	Look at this. Spitsnats, Russian.
	They're the good guys.
	New law lets Army get info on High school kids, your psychological tests, your scores, everything, without your parents knowing.
	Again, all this through Homeland Security.
	Come on, folks. U.S. send suspects to face torture.
	What are they training your children to be?
	They take the patsies, the fall guys, for torture.
	Our troops are training on torturing people.
	They admit they're torturing them.
	Soaring achievement in spying microfly to infiltrate terrorists.
	Weapons sends messages loud and clear.
	New sound weapons being given to police.
	Marine training continues.
	British force field protects armored personnel carriers, tanks, zaps grenades.
	Again, there's all these different reports.
	This is America.
	MSNBC, the answer to protect America?
	What's their answer?
	Domestic CIA. Wake up, ladies and gentlemen.
	I could go for a hundred hours here and not cover it all.
	But I don't just have the articles.
	I've been there. I videotaped it.
	I've seen the New World Order in action.
	We're under attack. Warn everybody.
	Warn everybody you know.
	Warn them now! The government engineered the attacks.
	They had the military set up to grab the American people decades ago.
	They've been slowly, incrementally setting this up.
	Now most of the top video games, even the games the government puts out, you go out and kill Americans that resist the government.
	Your kids are simulating this in their minds.
unidentified		This is all set up and admitted.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		But we can speak out.
		We're the people. There's been a great backlash against Ashcroft and his camps and the tips program and all of this.
		The problem is they're going to blow more stuff up and say, see, you got to give us all your rights.
		Don't listen to the civil libertarians.
		Don't listen to the folks that, you know, say we deserve freedom.
		They're selling you tyranny.
		Check out the information for yourself.
unidentified		Go to InfoWars.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Isn't that interesting?
		The more things change, the more things stay the same.
		The only thing different now is InfoWars has a way better studio where this is being broadcast out of.
		It's not a blue screen sheet in an access building.
		It's actually four or five studios here in the Central Texas Command Center.
		And there's the tweet that takes you to the full version of Masters of Terror.
		I encourage you to go there.
		Take a look at this. Grab your own clips and say, look, look what Alex was talking about 20 years ago.
		It's happening now. Or show how it was then and then how it is now.
		Because that's how you wake people up when you show them that this isn't just something that just started.
		It's been going on for a long time.
		Maybe you were asleep, but now you have a chance to wake up.
		So when we come back from break, I'm going to play that Dominion voting clip I was talking about.
		I also got a little girl who basically had the school board running scared.
		And then we're going to get into the CEO of NPR, Catherine Mayer.
		And I got a guest on chemtrails and cloud seating.
		This song takes me back to riding, getting picked up to go to school back when I was a freshman in high school.
		Listen to this album on tape.
		And this was always on the second side after one, which was their big hit.
		But this was always my favorite song on this album.
		The shortest straw has been pulled for you.
		And right now, the shortest straw is being pulled for the American people.
		We are getting reamed and railroaded.
		As a society, as a species, our souls are being corrupted.
		Yeah. It was all foretold though.
		It was all going to happen. Let's see what's happening in Oakland right now, though.
		Let's take a look at the status of Oakland, California.
		Just roll that video and I'll talk over top of it.
		Yeah. Here's what it looks like.
		This is your shithole Democrat city.
		Right here. I mean, if you look at any third-world country, you wouldn't notice a difference.
		You'd think this was a third-world country that you're driving through.
unidentified		No, it's Oakland, California. No.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And then, here's the type of people you see, right?
		We didn't see any people there.
		It was sort of a ghost town. But let's look and see what type of people we would see in Oakland, California.
		Well, here's a nice lady.
		You know, she's just on a drug overdose.
		Yeah. You know, and this is different from the horse tranquilizer mixed with heroin.
		Because that just made people just kind of lean over like they were on lean or something.
		They'd lean over.
		But this lady, she's a contortionist now.
		I think this is going to be a new Olympic sport.
		Body contortioning freestyle.
		I mean, off her rocker.
		I mean, when they're talking about zombie apocalypse, this is what they're talking about, right here.
		And it's not just this one example.
		Here's another one. Interestingly, it's both women.
		So for some reason, women are into shape-shifting.
		I mean, this is what's going on in our society right now.
		These are people in public, on the streets, having convulsions, muscle spasms.
		And obviously they need more than being put on social media.
		They need help. They need lots of help.
unidentified		Cops are gonna come.
unidentified		Why?
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		But, what do you have in these western cities?
		You have them actually promoting this.
		We actually have a tourism video from the city of San Francisco.
		This is going to blow your mind. But this is what they put up.
		Guys, let's roll that video.
unidentified		Welcome to the most beautiful city in the world, where it's never the same, but always San Francisco.
		San Francisco, I'm coming home again, never to roam again.
		I've come, San Francisco, I don't need Frisco.
		San Francisco, here I come.
		Here I come.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Ready? Yeah, I'm ready to go.
unidentified		San Francisco, right when I arrive, I really come alive.
		Good old city, it's where I live.
		San Francisco, right when I arrive, I really come alive.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And I'm not making fun of these people.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		This is an indictment on the people who run this city.
unidentified		They're letting this go on.
		It's totally, totally disgusting.
		You let nobody wait outside your door.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		There it is. Always San Francisco.
		All right. I mean, they're crazy enough to put that out.
		They think that's a tourism video right here.
		Hey, come see our drug addicts.
		Come buy from our open-air markets.
		You could get, you know, I think they sell the deodorant for what?
		It was $15. Savannah Hernandez was in front of the deodorant case in New York City.
		It was $15 for the deodorant.
		But you can probably get it for $9 out on the black market.
		So why not do it?
		You know, this is what we're doing to ourselves as a society.
		We've let it get this far, thanks to Joe Biden.
		But there is a little hope.
		For all this video, I think we have enough time, of the 14-year-old.
		If not, we'll pick it up after the break.
		But here's a 14-year-old girl talking to her school board.
		As an adult should be talking to the school board.
unidentified		Here it is. I'm back by popular demand.
		However, it seems I'm not so popular with certain people.
		One of them is your wife, Mr.
		King. She is very worried about me advocating for students.
		However, I want to commend her for bringing attention on her social media posts To some of my greatest accomplishments, like being the youngest person ever to give a speech on stage at a Trump rally.
		The crowd was over 10,000 people and millions more online.
		Also the fact I've been involved in politics since I was six years old.
		That was my own choosing, as my parents were completely uninvolved in politics until I expressed an interest in it.
		Your wife, Mr. King, is upset that a 14-year-old is advocating so well for herself and others that she's making her own decisions about the direction of her life.
		Apparently, she fails to recognize her own hypocrisy in all this, considering she supports the Pride Movement, a movement that openly touts children as Please, there's no personal taxing.
		As toddlers, decided to change their gender.
		Let me speak. No.
dr peter mccullough ▲ ● ▼		We're not allowed to protect you.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		You're not allowed to protect us.
unidentified		I report in my time.
		And adults must affirm that child's name.
		Keep going, Amelia. Mr.
		King. Mr. Rocky.
		Sisters, I reclaim my time.
		This is my time to speak, not yours.
		Mr. King, others weigh in on your wife's social media posts.
		Ron called me an unfortunate child.
		I'm not unfortunate at all.
		The unfortunate children are those of leftist parents who use their children's transgender identity as a badge of honor.
		As a band is honored, who fight to keep graphic folks in school libraries so their children can read them, then be susceptible to being groomed or victims of sexual crimes.
		They want drag queens in schools and even take their kids to crime parades where men and women expose their and everyone touts the virtues or lack thereof.
		With being part of all that insanity, No, to all that, I am an extremely fortunate child.
		My parents taught me morals and values and how to prudently think and do my own research.
		I have a dad who works extremely hard and even risked his life to serve our country in two wars.
		So, I've learned respect for the American flag, Pledge of Allegiance, Veterans, and love for our country.
		My parents recognized the decline of public schools and saved me from that toxic environment.
		I'm learning more being homeschooled than I ever did in public school.
		Perhaps your wife and her ilk feel threatened by me advocating for kids because I pose a threat to their system.
		A system that indoctrinates kids into mindless activists who will be unable to fully function in the real world or lead happy lives.
		My advice is to stop worrying about me That's what you need to do.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Teaching kids to stand up for themselves, to be forthright, And demand their rights.
		She demanded her rights. She said, I want my time back because you're interrupting my time.
		Oh, we're not allowed to make personal attacks.
		My wife still had to criticize you on social media, but don't you come in here and tell people that because now you're attacking us.
		It's this perpetual victimhood.
		That's what these liberals are doing.
		We're going to look at gas prices when we come back.
		Play this clip from the new NPR CEO. And I've got a guest coming up.
		We're going to talk about cloud seeding and chemtrails.
		And we'll probably do a whole hour with him.
unidentified		So... Alright, somebody's pitting the R&B here on the war room.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Wow, why are we showing a picture of LBJ? It's interesting.
		The crew is doing something interesting.
		Now, I got a chart here.
		Citizen Free Press, a site I consider the new Drudge Report, put out a chart of the gas prices under the last four presidents.
		There's a sneak peek. And before we get to that, that was the lead-up to the plug, guys.
		Way to kill my mojo.
		I want to tell you that the way we survive here, it's not from big corporate sponsors.
		It's not from grants from the federal government.
		In fact, the federal government probably hates us.
		I mean, they've basically said so.
		We've caught them on hidden cameras saying they hate us.
		No, no, you out there...
		Watching this show, getting information that you can then use to spread to other people is how we keep going.
		So it's when you go to InfoWarsStore.com.
		Right now we have Vital Mineral Fusion back in stock.
		Jones was talking about this the other day.
		Taking a couple scoops and making a pitcher of juice.
		So instead of having orange juice in the fridge, you have Vital Mineral Fusion.
		Your kids are going to drink this.
		And they're going to get vitamin C, D, and E, B12, calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, L-glutamine, coenzyme Q10, and more vital nutrients.
		I would say you can even scroll on that image.
		You can even show people where on the back you can look and see all the things that are in vitamin, mineral, fusion.
		Go back one. There it is right there.
		I can't even read that.
		I have terrible...
		There we go. Good job.
		Vitamin A, vitamin C, vitamin D, vitamin E, vitamin K, thiamin, riboflavin, niacin, vitamin B6, folate, vitamin B12, biotin, penthoric acid, calcium, magnesium, zinc, selenium, copper, manganese, chromium, Molybindium.
		I wonder if they put that in the chemtrail.
		I'm joking. Glycine.
		And then you got L-arginine, L-cysteine, L-glutamine, coenzyme Q10, N-acetylcysteine.
		N-acetylcysteine is actually really beneficial for your body.
		It helps your body make glutathione, which is what you need to keep yourself from getting COVID. It's one of the protectors of it.
		In my opinion, I should say.
		Next up, Bodies.
		If you're looking for joint support or anything anti-inflammatory, check out Bodies.
		I use it every day. In fact, these next two products, Bodies and DNA Force, every day I take them.
		Take two DNA Force, sometimes one body, sometimes two, sometimes three.
		If I go cycling hard, three bodies, no problem.
		Boom. Taking them. And what's great about the bodies is it's got pepperine, which is black pepper, essentially.
		It helps absorb the turmeric into your body, thereby increasing its anti-inflammatory benefits.
		And our turmeric root extract has 95% curcuminoids.
		So check that out. It's 40% off.
		It's almost out of stock.
		And then we also have DNA Force.
		These two are my go-to among other things every day.
		DNA Force Plus is 50% off now.
		Look at that. It says 40% off there.
		40% off. 38.
		They told me 50% in my head.
		Does it say 50? Oh, it says it there.
		Yeah. Somebody needs to check the site.
		Good thing we're doing our due diligence here on the air.
		Check out DNA Force.
		It's got PQQ, coenzyme Q10, organic reishi, astragalus, and more.
		And what does it do? It keeps your cells from dying quicker.
		So if you have, if your cells are going to die in 10 days, maybe now they're going to die in 20 days.
		double the life of your cells.
		I don't know all the science behind it, but I do know PQQ and CoQ10,
		people look for that stuff all the time.
		It's huge.
		And that's how you support us at infowarsstore.com.
		Infowarsstore.com is where you could go right now, open up a browser window, boom, check out what we have.
		If you're looking for something, hey, you could just make a donation.
		If you're like, hey, I like what's going on at InfoWars, I want them to continue. Boom, there's a donation.
	There's all ways you can help out.
	But Alex really likes people to get products because then they get them and they tell their friends about them and it's word of mouth advertising, which works really well these days if you look at all the TikTok influencers getting all that ad money.
	So people want to hear from people they know.
	Now, let's go to my phone and check out this chart.
	Here on Citizen Free Press, gas prices under the last four presidents.
	So let's click, let's zoom in on that.
	In 2001, we were paying $1.46 a gallon.
	Right there, you can see that, 2001.
	And that was probably before 9-11 because then it went down a little bit in 2002, which makes sense because not as many people were traveling.
	We had a backlog of what was going on.
	But then look at that. It shoots up.
	By the end of Bush's presidency, it's $3.30 a gallon, which is kind of where we're at now.
	In some places across the country.
	This is an average, so some results may vary.
	Then Barack Obama gets in.
	Well, gas had gone down to 241.
	It ended his presidency at 225, but it went as high as 368.
	And that's an average across the country.
	California is probably paying like $6, $7 a gallon.
	I remember seeing those stories.
	Now, we go to Trump, $2.53, $2.81, $2.69, $2.26.
	That's where it ends on, $2.26.
	So almost as good as Obama's lowest terms, one cent higher.
	Ben Obama's. And then we got Joe Biden.
	And they go, oh, we're drilling all this oil.
	We're doing all this. But we're not selling it here.
	We're just selling it to the other people in the world.
	It's $3.47 right now.
	Start off at $3.10. When is highest?
	$4.6. So we had the highest gas prices since 2001 under Joe Biden.
	Which is why people are out there carrying their pre-printed signs, going to where he's showing up.
	Because he doesn't tell you where he's showing up.
	You have to kind of guess it. And protesting.
	There's some... Wow, that's probably from California.
	$8.05 for regular gas.
	Incredible. For one gallon.
	Wow. That's crazy.
	But see, that's why people are protesting.
	And they have people on TV saying, oh no, everything's fine.
	You're good. Don't worry about it.
	Everything's fine. But it's not fine.
	Alright, we have time to go to this clip.
	But see, the people at NPR are going to tell you everything's fine.
	Why? Because...
	The person who came from Wikipedia, Catherine Mayer, who's the new CEO of NPR, is basically telling you in this TED Talk that, hey, it's okay on Wikipedia that we lie to you because we do it because we're trying to find common ground.
	Here is her semantical argument for lying to you.
katherine maher ▲ ● ▼		But what about the hard things, the places where we are prone to disagreement, say politics and religion?
		Well, as it turns out, not only does Wikipedia's model work there, it actually works really well.
		Because in our normal lives, these contentious conversations tend to erupt over disagreement about what the truth actually is.
		But the people who write these articles, they're not focused on the truth.
		They're focused on something else, which is the best of what we can know right now.
		And after seven years of working with these brilliant folks, I've come to believe that they are onto something.
		That perhaps, for our most tricky disagreements, seeking the truth and seeking to convince others of the truth might not be the right place to start.
		In fact, a reverence for the truth might be a distraction that's getting in the way of finding common ground and getting things done.
		Now, that is not to say that the truth doesn't exist, nor is it to say that the truth isn't important.
		Clearly, the search for the truth has led us to do great things, to learn great things.
		But, I think if I were to really ask you to think about this, one of the things that we could all acknowledge is that part of the reason we have such glorious chronicles to the human experience and all forms of culture is because we acknowledge there are many different truths.
		And so in the spirit of that, I'm certain that the truth exists for you and probably for the person sitting next to you.
		But this may not be the same truth.
		This is because the truth of the matter is very often for many people what happens when we merge facts about the world with our beliefs about the world.
		So we all have different truths.
		They're based on things like where we come from, how we were raised, and how other people perceive us.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So the truth can be many things.
		Um...
		Alternative facts.
		Whatever you want. Remember when Kellyanne Conway said alternative facts and everybody had a fit?
		But here's the head of NPR saying, we're going to tell you our truth at NPR. This is before she was at NPR. This is when she was still at Wikipedia.
		Which, if you go on Wikipedia, you can see it's a cesspool of leftist ideology.
		They... They love to edit these things to their truth.
		And their truth is Trump's a Nazi.
		As long as you know that, that's all you need to know.
		That's your guiding North Star.
		Trump is a Nazi to these people.
		We'll be back with more.
		Thanks for watching.
		I'm your host Rob Dew on the war room.
		You can follow me on X at Dews News.
		D-E-W-S-N-E-W-Z.
		We've got a whole bunch more of a show we're going to get into the chemtrails next hour.
		Hope you stay with us.
		Inforest.com forward slash show.
unidentified		Joining us now is CBS News senior investigative correspondent Katherine Harrodge.
		Catherine, thanks for being here today.
		Of course. You were at the courthouse today.
		What can we expect tomorrow?
		Legal experts have told CBS News that the California tax case is a very serious prosecution.
		It's nine charges, six misdemeanors, failure to file, failure to pay, and then these three felony charges that include allegations of tax evasion.
		A judge in the District of Columbia is ordering Katherine Herridge to participate in a deposition.
		It's regarding a confidential source she used in a series of stories when she worked at Fox News in 2017.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		It says a lot about our fading republic when Congress has to hold a hearing where journalists testify on protecting their First Amendment sources.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		In the words of seasoned, award-winning journalist Katherine Herridge...
unidentified		When the network of Walter Cronkite Seizes your reporting files, including confidential source information, That is an attack on investigative journalism.
		Yes, it sure is.
		I'm just trying to...
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		It seems to me there's a pattern developing here.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Failing upwards is the way this CIA institutionalized and government-funded mockingbird media propagandized system operates.
unidentified		In an article related to your case, the Washington Post reported how in 2005, five national reporters were held in contempt and levied fines of $500 per day.
		And in 2008, a USA Today reporter was held in contempt and faced daily fines of $5,000.
		All of these instances where reporters upheld their journalistic integrity and protected their sources to ensure good reporting for the American people.
		Only to face rebuke and heavy-handed enforcement by the courts, which are intended to protect the First Amendment.
		Ms. Herridge, how fundamental to reporting is the protection of your sources?
		I'm facing contempt fines Because I am upholding the most basic principle of journalism.
		If you cannot offer a source, a promise of confidentiality, as a journalist, your toolbox is empty.
		No whistleblowers coming forward.
		No government official with evidence of misconduct or corruption.
		And what that means is that it interrupts the free flow of information to the public.
		And as we've all recognized, journalism is about an informed electorate, which is the bedrock of our democracy.
		If signed into law, the Press Act would establish the first federal press shield law in United States history and will significantly strengthen press freedom by safeguarding journalists and their confidential sources.
		The Press Act creates a federal statutory privilege to shield journalists from being compelled to reveal their confidential sources and prevents federal law enforcement agencies from abusing subpoena power to access journalists' email and phone records.
		This long overdue legislation represents a significant leap forward, not just for journalists, but for the sanctity of journalism itself and for the constitutional right to freedom of the press.
		Countless news stories that I broke or facets of them could not have been reported without sources whose identities needed to be protected.
		To name just a few, Enron, BP oil spill, TARP bank bailout, follow the money investigations on taxpayer spending, congressional oversight, congressional fundraising, prescription drug and vaccine dangers, Haiti earthquake aid, K Street lobbying, green energy failures, waste and fraud at the Red Cross, Firestone Tires, Benghazi, and Fast and Furious.
		The last 12 stories I mentioned, thanks to some information provided by sources who could not be quoted by name, received recognition from the Emmy Awards.
		Multiply that by thousands of reporters and countless stories, and it's fair to argue that a lot of important facts would never have been exposed if journalists couldn't ensure protection of our sensitive sources' identities.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		In order to protect honest journalists from the power-mad CIA tyranny of a demoralized and corrupted executive branch, we as a nation We must hold these truths that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof or abridging the freedom of speech or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
unidentified		And that's the way it is.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		John Bowne reporting for InfoWars.
unidentified		So what made you decide to start a podcast?
		Obviously, everybody and their mother has a podcast.
		Yours is genuinely special.
		You know what? I'm going to add my name to the hat of podcasting.
rob agueros ▲ ● ▼		Man, covering everything here every day, you get so tossed into the mix that when you get out, when you're on your way home, you just realize you have so much in you to say, so much in you to vent.
		And it was like that with the crew as well.
		So basically, the idea started where I wanted to have the crew We're good to go.
		A different way to receive news sometimes.
		A different message.
		At the same time, I want to have fun.
		We have to be able to make fun of all these people who are trying to, you know, infringe on all of our rights.
		And it's so easy. Like, the comedic material is there.
unidentified		It writes itself. You sit down in the classic Infowars podcast room that you retrofitted.
		You redid the whole thing.
		And it's just nostalgic and new at the same time.
rob agueros ▲ ● ▼		It's awesome. Dude, and once you get into that, you feel the energy, you feel the nostalgia, you feel just so connected to everything there.
		I'm so glad that everybody who's come on so far has loved it, and everybody, you know, they can't wait for the episodes to drop, and I'm truly blessed to be able to be able to do this at all, and I wouldn't be able to do anything if it wasn't for you fans.
		Shop at Infowarsstore.com, get an X3 DNA Force.
		All the products that we sell, If it wasn't for you guys supporting us, none of this would happen.
		Chase wouldn't be sitting in this chair.
		I wouldn't be going on the battle tank with Owen or us being able to go to Stop the Steal.
		There's so many things, so many epic things that we've been able to do here at InfoWars, and it's all thanks to you.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So, like, the carpet really ties the room together, so I need it back, Mr.
		Lebowski. I'm the dude.
		That was Chase Geiser who made those this morning.
		You're watching The War Room.
		Thanks for joining me today.
		I'm a little slightly under the weather, but we're working through it.
		I've got cough drops and other coughing aids.
		Haven't had to use the cough button yet, so they're working.
		Also, an ivermectin.
		Don't tell the New World Order.
		I like to take it a lot.
		One of my favorite drugs now.
		So let's get into chemtrails.
		We had in Dubai just the other day, yesterday, they're experiencing some of the worst flooding.
		They received a year's worth of rain in 24 hours.
		Let's roll some of that B-roll guys and people can see what it's like.
		So they've been making it rain over there to make the desert bloom.
		I think it's called Dubai B-roll.
		Yeah, there we go. There we go.
		We got planes on the runway.
		We got furniture getting thrown off of high-rises.
		Was Dubai's apocalyptic storm self-inflicted?
		Claims UAE, United Arab Emirates, flew cloud-seeding flights, which increased rainfall...
		The day before 18 inches of rain fell in 24 hours.
		They have a typo. It says 18 months of rain fell in 24 hours.
		Okay, so maybe 18 months worth of rain fell in 24 hours.
		Causing chaos that closed the airport and sparked a rush to flee the country.
		People are freaking out.
		And this is technology that's been around forever.
		Our guest coming up at the bottom of the hour actually works for a company that does this.
		It's called Rainmaker.
		MakeRain.com.
		MakeRain.com.
		So they make the world habitable.
		And basically, you know, one thing they have on here is the earth, we're running out of water.
		No, we're running out of clean water.
		Okay, we're running out of clean water.
		And we're not taking the steps we need to make more clean water.
		Putting fluoride in, it doesn't make it clean.
		Here's some of the technology they offer.
		We're going to get into cloud seeding, but I want to start this talking about actual chemtrails.
		We have a clip from John Brennan at the Council of Foreign Relations.
		We played this clip before. You've seen it.
		Looking for my video list.
		I don't know. Do you have...
		You got it? All right, Rob.
		Go ahead and roll that John Brennan clip where he admits that's what we're doing.
		We call it... We give it a bunch of names.
		Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. We're the government.
		But it's chemtrails.
john brennan ▲ ● ▼		Here it is. Another example is the array of technologies, often referred to collectively as geoengineering, that potentially could help reverse the warming effects of global climate change.
		One that has gained my personal attention is stratospheric aerosol injection, or SAI, a method of seeding the stratosphere with particles that can help reflect the sun's heat in much the same way that volcanic eruptions do.
		An SAI program could limit global temperature increases, reducing some risks associated with higher temperatures and providing the world economy additional time to transition from fossil fuels.
		This process is also relatively inexpensive.
		The National Research Council estimates that a fully deployed SAI program would cost about $10 billion yearly.
		As promising as it may be, moving forward on SAI would also raise a number of challenges for our government and for the international community.
		On the technical side, greenhouse gas emission reductions would still have to accompany SAI to address other climate change effects, such as ocean acidification, because SAI alone would not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere.
		On the geopolitical side, the technology's potential to alter weather patterns and benefit certain regions of the world at the expense of other regions could trigger sharp opposition by some nations.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And that's the fight that we're getting into, is people think they're taking water from one area, dropping it in another, and thereby there's no water.
		The problem is there's plenty of water.
		But you can see, when the United Arab Emirates seed some clouds, they can create rain.
		So that was John Brennan on geoengineering, basically meeting the programs working.
		I'll play some clips later of a guy named Jim Lee.
		He did a really long interview on the high wire back at the end of March talking about this.
		And at one point they had a plan that would only take 14 jets flying around continuously to make this happen.
		So 14 jets, they can chemtrail the planet.
		Now let's go to Bill Gates on geoengineering.
		This is, you know, Bill Gates wants to bury trees, not plant trees.
		He really cares about you.
		He wants more vaccines to take 10% of the population.
		And here he is wanting to block out the sun so you can't grow vegetables.
unidentified		Bill Gates is backing the first high-altitude experiment of one radical climate change solution, creating a massive chemical cloud that could cool the Earth.
		It's called solar geoengineering, and it's highly controversial.
		It would look something like this.
		Thousands of planes would fly very high and use nozzles to inject millions of tons of light-reflecting particles into the stratosphere.
		It would create a thin chemical cloud of those particles around the whole planet, blocking some sunlight from reaching the surface.
		It would mimic a giant volcanic eruption, which we know cools the Earth.
		One reason this technology is appealing, it's cheap.
		One study estimates it would cost an average of 2.25 billion globally every year for the first 15 years of deployment.
		Compare that to the half a trillion dollars the US government estimates it will cost just the US by
		2100 if no action is taken against climate change Bill Gates is among a dozen individual donors and 14
		foundations backing the first stratospheric solar geoengineering experiment out of Harvard
		It's called stratospheric controlled perturbation experiment or scopex
		Lift instruments about 20 kilometers into the stratosphere where it will release less than two kilograms of different
		naturally occurring chemicals like calcium carbonate and sulfates and
		Then measure the change in atmospheric chemistry and light scatter
		That's not what plants need.
		The Harvard group that runs Scopex and other experiments has raised more than $16 million, more than double any other solar geoengineering effort.
		And annual global funding has gone up from $1 million in 2008 to $8 million in 2018, with the majority of that funding coming from the U.S. The first phase of Scopex will cost around $3 million, with much more needed for wider research on solar geoengineering.
john brennan ▲ ● ▼		The White House posting...
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right, we can kill it there. What's funny is all those numbers are 2019.
		They're pre-COVID. So you could add, like...
		You could double those easily.
		And nobody's going to bat an eye.
		They're going to be like, oh, yeah, that's what we do.
		We just double the money.
		So now...
		I want to go to these few clips.
		This is Jim Lee.
		Who is a... He's with climateviewer.com.
		And he was on the high wire with Dale Bigtree.
		So he's going to explain, let's see, here's the first use, or no, early reports of sunblocking.
		So people have been bitching about this since the 50s.
		This is not a new phenomenon, even though people think it just started happening in the 90s.
		He takes you through the history, but here, and he shows the articles, so I'd encourage you to go look them up.
		Here's the first one, the early reports of sun blocking with Jim Lee from Climate Viewer.
unidentified		Here it is. And the earliest documentation we have on, you know, planes making clouds, blocking out the sun, is 1948.
		And in 1958, Palm Springs, California, actually got into it with the Air Force because Because they said basically their entire tourism industry is predicated on having sunshine-filled skies, yet our skies look like a mob of exuberant sky riders blocking out the sun.
		In 1970, the state of Illinois and New Jersey sued the airline industry for blocking out the sun.
		Secretary of Transportation James A. Volpe actually stepped in to mediate the lawsuit and try to settle it out of court.
		And the airline industry agreed to install new burner cans or fuel injectors to reduce particulate emissions over the state of Illinois, New Jersey, promising this would reduce what they called at that time smoke pollution of the sky.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Alright, smoke pollution in the sky.
		That's what they were doing. So people were bitching about this in the 80s, this 50s, all the way up.
		And now, you know, I've seen, I would say, I wouldn't call Cat Turd a mainstream report, but Cat Turd is even showing pictures of what you're seeing behind me right now.
		Chemtrails. And we're going to get into that with this.
		We got 13 minutes left.
		Let's see if we can get to all these reports before we bring up our guest.
		Augustus DiRico, who seeds clouds for a living.
		But he also talks about chemtrails.
		So I'm anxious to talk to this guy, especially since what we saw happen in Dubai.
		Now, let's go to the first use of the word chemtrail, which did come in the 90s.
		98, I believe he says.
unidentified		So here it is. So the word chemtrail comes about circa 1997.
		That was the first time it was used on the internet.
		The very first article about chemtrails was specifically about JP8 jet fuel and how it markedly increased the amount of clouds in the sky.
		And this is due to The conversion, all NATO countries converted from gasoline to kerosene in what they called one fuel for the battlefield, or the single fuel concept.
		This dramatically increased the amount of metal nanoparticles in the atmosphere.
		So that's why, in my personal opinion, though there have been long-standing complaints, there is a marked increase from 1996 to present in the number of visible trails that hang out everywhere.
		All right.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Increase in visible trails that hang out anywhere from the 90s when they changed the fuel to GP8, which is a kerosene.
		Alright, now, there's lots of pictures of inside planes that show these tanks.
		These are chemtrail vehicles.
		And here's a debunking of that.
		And he explains what it actually is.
		But there's even a picture of Trump in here walking through one.
		Oh, Trump knows about the chemtrail program.
		This one I put out, especially for the Q-tards.
		I love you all. Here it is.
unidentified		And then I think about the photos I've seen of these, you know, airplanes with these giant tanks of liquid inside of them, and I think I don't see any room for luggage in there.
		These are what are called ballast tanks.
		Ballast tanks, generally speaking, almost exclusively, are for testing flights before they're commissioned for public use.
		So in those tanks, and you'll see the pipes running along the ground, there's a lot of water.
		And the purpose of this, famous one, Trump travels through chemtrail plane.
		And that was actually the Boeing 737 Dreamliner.
		Before it became public.
		In that plane, they had the ballast tanks.
		And it's to simulate, for lack of a better word, a large person rapidly moving around the cockpit.
		It's to simulate luggage or heavy, you know, anything in the cargo bay.
		Rapidly moving around to try to throw the plane off balance.
		So there's a rugged set of tests that have to be done to each plane.
		And these are the most common misused images for the chemtrail community.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So just by debunking these photos doesn't mean chemtrails don't exist because we just learned that All the NATO countries traded their regular fuel into this jet fuel, which has a lot of heavy metals in it, which is what we're seeing.
		Now, is there one called Intent?
		I don't see that one in here.
		I might have to go find that one during the break, and we'll play that one on the rest.
		So, in fact, I'm going to go find that one while we do this Chemtrails Explained.
		Because the intent is where he shows that they want these clouds to do this.
		They want this to happen in the daytime to reflect the sun back and then disappear at night.
		And the way they do it is using AI. So here it is, clip eight.
		Kim Trails explains. It's a six-minute clip, but it's very interesting.
		You need to pay attention to this.
unidentified		Here it is. The Obama administration, while everybody was having the Trump-Hillary Clinton election, you know, wall-to-wall coverage.
		Everything always happens while nobody's looking right.
		The Obama administration signed the Federal Alternative Aviation Fuel Emissions Pact with the European Union, China, and the ICAO. This can be summed up in just a couple words, biofuels for contrail control.
		Which goes back to what Ulrich Schumann was saying.
		To change the chemical constituents coming out of jet aircraft so that there's less warming, more cooling contrails.
		So I got in touch with the guy at the FAA who was testing the biofuels.
		His name is Dr. Rangasai Halthori.
		He is the head of the FAA's Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative.
		And I specifically asked him, and I sent him the documentation, I said, what did Ulrich Schumann mean by less warming, more cooling contrails?
		Predictable for operational planning.
		He says... And he plays it off, but at the end of the day he says, we want more contrail-induced cirrus clouds by day and none by night.
		Wow. This is intent.
		I have this signed in writing directly from the head of the FAA's ACCRI. So now I have these two dots that I've got here pointed together, plus the biofuels thing.
		Now you look and you see American Airlines pairing up with Google artificial intelligence to route planes around contrail forming Spaces in the sky.
		These are called ice super saturated regions.
		Basically Google AI and It goes back to what Ulrich Schumann had actually created in 2010.
		He produced something called COSIP, the Contrail Cirrus Prediction Tool.
		COSIP has evolved to be part of what's called the next-gen transportation system in America.
		That's what makes all the tic-tac-toes in the sky.
		It is a supercomputer that routes all the flights, and inside that supercomputer is a subsystem called the Aviation Environment Design Tool, AEDT. In the AEDT, it tells planes at what altitude to fly, how much fuel to burn, all of these things, and it takes in environmental concerns into how it routes flights.
		So when you compare, when you sum it up, you got Schumann, less warming, more cooling contrails, Rangasai Hathori, clouds by day, none during the night.
		What did the Biden administration just come out with?
		A report on solar radiation modification.
		What three areas of study did they say they want to focus on?
		Stratospheric aerosol injection, They call it solar radiation modification.
		Marine cloud brightening.
		We can get into that if you want.
		I'm going to skip it. And cirrus cloud thinning.
		So what you have here is a grand conspiracy between the scientists who are trying to, as they would put it, mitigate global warming impacts from aviation.
		But in reality, what they're doing is they're turning what's been 60 to 80 years worth of pollution into an active geoengineering program.
		All right. So let me just, just for people, because this is super fascinating.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So Dale kind of re-summarizes it.
		I encourage you to go watch the whole interview.
		It's from the end of March in 2024.
		That's Jim Lee, a climate viewer, basically talking about this.
		I have one more clip I want to play before we get to the break, and this is talking about the intent.
		And then maybe we'll play this last one, the chemtrail versus the contrail, because people like to have that debate, especially there's people online that want to say, oh, these things don't exist.
		Well, they changed the jet fuel to have these things in it, And then they've created with AI these patterns where how they make the planes fly.
		So they tell the planes to go fly this way to make the chemtrails happen during the day.
		And then at night they tell them to go fly at another spot at another altitude or lower or higher.
		And then that doesn't make the chemtrails.
		So everybody's happy because that lets the heat go away.
		So they're trying to scientifically cool the planet, put us into another ice age.
		But this is the intent clip.
		This is another one of the smoking guns of the Kim Trail program.
unidentified		Here it is. But back to why the commercial aviation, the 130,000 to 150,000 flights per day, the 15 million barrels of jet fuel per day just in the United States that are burned.
		I wanted to find that smoking gun, that memo, that intent.
		And it came to me in 2010 at an ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization, Colloquium on Climate Change.
		From the world's leading expert on contrail physics, Ulrich Schumann.
		He's from Germany's DLR, their NASA. At the end of his little thesis, he said, we want less warming, more cooling contrails, predictable for operational planning.
		That was a smoking gun for me.
		And that really opened my eyes to what the nefarious agenda behind all this was.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right. Guys, go back to that still where it shows the quote again, because I want to read that quote to people.
		This is the proof right here.
		They want less warming and more cooling.
		It's exactly what Bill Gates said.
		It's exactly what John Brennan said.
		If you go watch the videos, what in the world are they spraying?
		Why in the world are they spraying? How in the world are they spraying?
		Two of which are on InfoWars on Bandit video under the InfoWars film section.
		Less warming, more cooling contrails.
		Predictable for operational planning.
		That's the intent behind it.
		How did they do that? They got them to change the jet fuel.
		So now any plane is basically a chemtrailing plane.
		It doesn't need a special nozzle on it.
		Most of those special nozzles, which we're going to talk to our guest coming up, are for cloud seeding.
		So you have two different forms of geoengineering going on.
		You have a lower level cloud seeding.
		And then you have this upper level in the stratosphere, which is putting out these particles to reflect the sun.
		That is what we are seeing.
		That is what we've been bitching about.
		And the people who have been saying it's chemtrails with chemicals in there, they're right.
		There are chemicals in there.
		The whole jet program is chemtrails.
		But what's interesting is the way they're flying them.
		And that might be on the end of that six-minute clip, which we'll play that after our guest leaves us, of the clip eight.
		We'll play the rest of that where Dale starts talking because he kind of sums it up again.
		And then they explain how there's computer systems.
		That tell the planes where to fly.
		And this was all done by executive order with Obama during the, when it was Hillary Clinton vs.
		Trump, the campaign going on.
		They were basically changing the jet fuel, putting these things in place so they could terraform the planet.
		They want to change the planet. They want to get rid of carbon dioxide because that's what plants breathe and that's what helps plants grow.
		For some reason, I don't know why, maybe to kill people, but most likely to kill people.
		It's going to kill people. If the temperatures get colder, that's what's worse for us.
		We saw that in the 70s with Dr.
		Spock narrating the documentary about the coming ice age.
		That's what's happening. And then they're going to say, oh, we did it.
		Our program helped bring about the ice age, which we don't need.
		We need more CO2. We love CO2. CO2 is what plants breathe, people.
		Okay? We're going to be back with our cloud seeding expert coming up.
		All right. Thank you for joining me on The War Room.
		I'm your host, Rob Dew. My guest, Augustus Dorico.
		From MakeRain.com, you can follow him at Dorico on X. And he caught my eye.
		Actually, somebody on Twitter said, hey, you should have this guy on.
		And I watched his testimony in front of the Texas legislature because they passed a rule about no chemtrailing, essentially, or no geoengineering is what they call it.
		And I think, Augustus, what you were trying to do was show them the difference between stratospheric Particle releases, what John Brennan was talking about earlier.
		I don't know if you're watching the show, but you've probably seen the John Brennan clip, I'm sure, since you're in the business.
		It's come through you. And to what you do.
		So explain what you do and how that's different from what these mad scientists are doing trying to cool the Earth.
		Nice mullet, by the way. Totally.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, sir. Cloud seeding, what we do, is enhancing precipitation over areas that don't have enough water, over farms that are in drought, over municipalities that are in drought.
		You know, Arizona, for example, is banning housing developments because they don't have enough water, and cloud seeding is part of the solution to that problem.
		So it's emitting a mineral into clouds that already exist to make them precipitate more, either in the form of rain or snow.
		And cloud seeding is as different from stratospheric aerosol injection or solar radiation management as atomic power and natural gas is different from windmills and solar energy, right?
		Solar radiation management is the emission of reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight and cool the planet down.
		The effects are global.
		If somebody does it in Tennessee or India or China, then it will impact everybody just the same.
		And it hasn't been operationally tested at scale.
		We don't have lots of experimental data on what its results will be, even if we have done some modeling and can compare it to volcanic eruptions.
		Cloud seeding, on the other hand, it's existed for 78 years.
		It was invented in America.
		Its effects are localized, and the minerals used have been proven to be safe and healthy.
		They're 10 times safer than aspirin.
		Silver iodide is what's traditionally used.
		They don't bioaccumulate.
		They're insoluble in water. So it would take...
		An adult eating about half a pound of it all at once to have any radical toxic effects.
		They're all negligible. We haven't seen it bioaccumulate in watersheds at all.
		And frankly, I went to Tennessee because I'm in favor of America and American farmers having access to the best technology available in the world.
		and China spends $300 million a year on their weather modification and cloud seeding program.
		And so if you want to disadvantage American municipalities and American utilities and
		American farms that are subject to drought, then we should ban cloud seeding. But if you're pro
		America rather than pro China, we have to adopt this technology at scale.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Well, so going back to you saying there's no widespread program,
		and that is technically correct, but the US Code Section 50 says under section or so it's title 50
		section 1.52, the use of human subjects for testing chemical or biological agents by the
		Department of Defense, accounting to congressional committees with the respect to experiment and
		studies notification of local civilians. So there's places that they're allowed to test.
		And so what they can do is say, hey, we're going to run a test for 30 years.
		And we're going to just spray the skies for 30 years and call it testing.
		And that's how they get around it.
		When you're doing your work, how many times have you seen these other planes doing it?
		And I don't know if you're watching the clips I was playing from Jim Lee, where he's saying basically every commercial flight out there is a potential chemtrailer.
		It just depends on where they fly.
		How does that jive with what you've done?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		And are you a pilot yourself? I'm getting my pilot's license, but we do drone-based seating instead.
		The costs are way lower operationally, although conventionally people have used planes for cloud seating.
		So you touched on probably two really big important things there, the first of which is, you know, the DOD has done all sorts of experiments.
		Goodness knows what's Goodness knows what of all varieties over the last 70 years.
		We can't account for all of that.
		They've used chemical weapons in different contexts.
		Cloud seeding even has been investigated by the DOD before.
		That said, if you're looking at a clean blue sky and you see those trails that people typically refer to as chemtrails, That's not cloud seeding, for one.
		Cloud seeding is where there's big, puffy clouds full of water already that you can emit minerals into that will condense the water into large enough droplets such that they fall.
		If you're looking at the clear blue sky and you see these contrails, or some people call them chemtrails, altogether different.
		You would never cloud seed on a day without cloud cover already.
		Now, with respect to what those trails are, Again, the DOD has done all sorts of crazy things over time, and we have added different unhealthy compounds to jet fuels over time.
		I wouldn't advise anybody huff them by any stretch, but just because there are unhealthy additives in those contrails, it does not necessarily mean, and I'm open to being presented more evidence on this, that every jet liner that's emitting water vapor that's freezing into a long, stringy cloud is producing chemtrails.
		And by the way, this again is altogether different than solar radiation management.
		You can't even see the aerosols that are emitted into the stratosphere by some of these programs because they're so high.
		They're not actually forming clouds.
		They're just reflecting aerosols.
		They're just reflecting light as small droplets up in the upper atmosphere.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And so you wouldn't even see those?
		You wouldn't even see them in cirrus clouds?
		Or are you saying you wouldn't see them at all?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		In cirrus clouds, if they are emitted in the right conditions, then you would see those.
		And some people do talk about, mind you, producing contrails, as you said earlier, to cool the planet, right?
		Because if you put them over a given area at the early morning or in the early morning, they'll reflect sunlight before it reaches the Earth to warm it up.
		So there are proposals, and there are people talking about explicitly doing that, no contest.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So I guess describe your process of when you, how big is the payload with a drone?
		How many drones do you need?
		Is it multiple drones?
		How do you do this? And then do you think that's what they did in Dubai?
		Or do you think they're using a conventional planes?
		Because I actually, I put a tweet out last night saying, this isn't climate change.
		This is cloud seeding.
		And you kind of agreed with me.
		You said there are programs out there that do that.
		I mean, I don't know if we know for sure.
		Everybody's saying it's a cloud seeding program gone haywire, but go ahead.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so for our payload, we're using a little bit less than two pounds of the nucleation agent, the mineral, spread over hundreds of thousands of acres, right?
		And so the amounts that you can measure on the ground, they're parts per trillion, parts per quadrillion, totally negligible with no adverse effects based on 78 years of data on either the environment, on terrestrial life, on humans, on aquatic life.
		And so that's what our operation looks like.
		It's making it rain more over farms, particularly like in the Central Valley of California.
		In the case of Dubai, they both use planes and drones.
		They openly and admittedly do that, and there's some conflicting reports from their own government as to whether or not it was cloud seeding that went on this past week.
		It seems more likely than not because next to China, the UAE's rain enhancement program is the most sophisticated and most developed of any in the world.
		And that being said, I think that in the case of any technology, be it atomic energy, be it AI, be it any pharmaceuticals, for sure, and then cloud seeding, it's something to be treated with tact, right?
		But all of these technologies, whether it's from China or somebody else, are going to come to bear.
		And so it's a question of who's going to steward them, right?
		Do we want cloud seeding technology to be in the hands exclusively of the CCP and state actors beyond the pale, or do we want Americans, you know, faulty that we can be sometimes, sinful that we can be sometimes, do we want Americans to dictate when we're allowed to use this technology, how we're allowed to deploy this technology, and ideally, how we can use it to serve the kingdom of God on Earth, right?
		How can we bring about...
		Better outcomes for our farmers, for our people in the American West, for people all over the world that are suffering from drought.
		That's my foremost interest.
		And I think that if you're in favor of building dams to redirect streams or rivers, that's modifying creation, right?
		And God tells Adam in the Garden of Eden to steward and modify and take dominion over creation.
		And I think that cloud seeding is just one new iteration.
		And granted, it's a meaningful and powerful technology, but it's just one new iteration of the dominion mandate that we have to steward the garden.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And, you know, I noticed that that's how you started off your testimony in the Tennessee legislature.
		You started talking about God wants us to take dominion over the earth.
		We farm. We dam up rivers.
		We make reservoirs. What else do we do?
		We harness the wind. We do all kinds of things, so why not make it rain as well if we have the power to do it?
		The question is, it does go haywire sometimes, and when we come back, we're going to talk about some of that.
		I want to get your comment on this, too.
		Somebody put this up. Welcome back to our last segment of the second hour of the war, and we've got one more hour to go after this.
		My guest is Augustus DiRico.
		He runs MakeRain.com, taking drones...
		Loading them up with a two-pound payload of silver iodide, which I guess comes in the form of a crystal, maybe tiny crystals, and then floods them into clouds and makes it rain or snow.
		I want to ask you, as a snowboarder, I love to cut fresh tracks in the POW. So...
		What has your success been with ski resorts and how do they approach you?
		Because this has got to be a timing issue.
		It's not like, hey, in three months we want you to show up and make it snow.
		It's got to be like, hey, there's clouds here now.
		How does that work? How does that whole process work of seeding clouds?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Totally. So there have to be clouds present.
		Yeah, you're right. But lots of clouds that are full of supercooled liquid water, meaning water that's below 32 degrees Fahrenheit, don't naturally precipitate because that water doesn't freeze.
		Isn't a large enough ice crystals, snowflakes to fall.
		What you can do is earlier in the season, then you naturally see precipitation.
		So maybe you naturally see precipitation in Utah or Colorado in December or late November.
		You can seed clouds earlier in the season and then later in the season to extend the amount of time that the slopes can be shredded on.
		And so cloud seeding has been done over ski resorts before.
		Vail has had a program in the past.
		And we're talking to ski resorts right now about how we can help them as well.
		Because the snowblowers, they work, right?
		You can produce snow locally.
		But the fresh powder that you get from an actual snowfall, even if it's anthropogenic, is way more fun.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, exactly. Definitely fluffier.
		The stuff I find, the man-made snow is more like ice chunks, essentially.
		It's like small ice chunks that shoot out So you say you do these programs with them.
		So you're mainly looking at the end and beginning of the seasons.
		In the middle, do they like, hey, we have a big cloud bank coming in.
		We need you here. And then how much time do you need to deploy if you get an order in for some cloud seeding technology?
		How long does it take you to deploy that?
		How many people does it take to run that operation?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yes. So we do seasonal operating agreements with all of our customers, be they farms, like all the ones we're servicing now, or ski resorts.
		So we deploy, install all of the relevant radar so we can detect the right clouds and the conditions they're in.
		And then the drones as well, of course, and the weather balloons for even more robust sensing and validation.
		So they're out there all season long, and they are forecasted out.
		Seven days in advance, three days in advance, one day in advance, and if we get to go, we can deploy in as little as 30 minutes.
		Part of what is really great about using drones for cloud seeding rather than planes is you're not beholden to air traffic control.
		You're not required to fly from wherever your airstrip is to get over the region of interest.
		You can be immediately below the target area, right?
		Whoever's paying you for this, be it a farm, a municipality, ski resort, and deploy at the drop of a hat so you can hit the very best conditions whenever you like.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Now on your site, you have, we are running out of water.
		Is this more of a, we're running out of clean water?
		Or how do you think we're running out of water?
		Because to me, water is a renewable resource.
		We drink it, it comes out, it goes into streams and toilets and ponds, and then gets evaporated, comes back down in rain.
		It's a renewable system.
		We're basically in like one of those little small snow globes with a terrarium type atmosphere.
		So why do you say we're running out of water?
		What do you particularly mean by that?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, so the amount of water on planet Earth stays more or less the same.
		We do a couple chemical processes like electrolysis to break down water and make hydrogen.
		But you're right. It is a closed loop, ultimately, be it whether the water is in the ocean,...or streams or our faucets or the ground in aquifers.
		The problem is, though, where the water is and whether or not it's accessible.
		So even if we have all the water that we want in the ocean, and we could desalinate all of that and send it inland, it's impossibly expensive to desalinate water on the coast of, say, California, and then pump that in to serve the needs of, say, Texas or Utah or Nevada.
		And so what we're running out of is accessible freshwater.
		Part of why I started Rainmaker was because I realized that desalination, though it's going to be great for California, though it's going to be great for a lot of coastal Texas, it's not going to be able to provide the water we need to, one, maintain the agriculture that we have in all of the southwestern United States and other areas around the world.
		And two, we're already seeing housing developments being banned or having their water cut off because there's not enough for these municipal utilities to provide.
		So if you look up the I believe the Rio Verde development in Scottsdale, Arizona, or Phoenix, Arizona, they had their water cut off after these houses were built, after these houses were purchased.
		There's farmers in Fresno, California, that are not able to pump water out to irrigate their farms anymore, and they have been for 100 years.
		And that's just because Even if it's a renewable resource, right?
		Even if there's as much as we could possibly use on the planet, it's a question of where it is, right?
		And we've built up this country, and I'm grateful that we have, and it's a wonderful thing that we have.
		But we've built up this country, and we've grown so much that we're at a point where we need to find new ways to produce more water, right?
		We don't want to just reduce consumption.
		By no means do we want degrowth.
		We don't want to make efficiency our sole intention.
		If all we get is low flow toilets and more efficient irrigation systems, or replacing grass with desert agriculture in Nevada, say, We're going to reduce our people's quality of life.
		We're going to reduce our agricultural economy.
		And we're going to see ecological collapse of species throughout the Colorado River.
		So yes, we have enough water on the planet, but we don't have enough water in the regions that we've settled and regions that we're growing in in the western United States.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		We've got about four minutes left.
		Let's get into dealing with governments because you've got to work with different state governments.
		California seems to be a state that has no idea how to control their natural resources.
		They get 10 feet of snow at a time up in the Cascades and then they just let it flow out into the ocean and go, well, we don't have water now.
		And now, you know, the almond farmers can't have a harvest.
		Why is it that some of these states seem to not understand that they need to be better stewards of their environment?
		And so I guess my question is, what's wrong with California?
		And then what states for you are the most easiest to work with?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, you know, the interesting thing is...
		Space. I'll use this analogy, right?
		Space. A lot of people might not believe in it.
		I think the moon is real.
		I think the moon landing is real.
		That could be a point of another conversation later.
		But I think that space, if you believe it's real, is a bipartisan issue, right?
		America's accomplishment of getting to the moon, of building the International Space Station, of trying to go to Mars and expand the boundaries This is something that everybody should and wants to get behind because it's part of what a spectacular human thriving future consists of.
		And in just the same way, cloud seeding and weather modification for the benefit of our agricultural interests, for the benefit of our ecosystems, for the sake of making More biodiverse and lush areas on the planet than we've ever seen before.
		That's something that is bipartisan.
		So people in Texas, cloud seed.
		And people in California, cloud seed.
		And people in Utah and people in New Mexico.
		Interestingly enough, it's more a question of whether you're familiar with cloud seeding and its benefits or not that dictates whether you are in favor of it.
		And hopefully, after our conversation and a series of other conversations I'm going to have in the upcoming year, More people are aware of it and more people are excited about America reclaiming the mantle of the largest operational cloud seeding program in the world rather than China.
		And so, you know, California has a licensing program for cloud seeding operators.
		Utah has a licensing program.
		Texas has a licensing program.
		It's really the Western states that are most desperate for water, the ones that realize they're going to see agricultural collapse if they don't produce more.
		Those are the ones that are easiest to work with.
		And then Tennessee, of course, who banned it.
		I think they banned it more because they were worried about chemtrails and didn't really know what cloud seeding was and what benefits it could confer onto their agricultural interests and their farmers.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, in fact, we'll probably play a couple excerpts because there's your testimony and then you have one of the reps asking you about, you know, he doesn't want to see.
		In his mind, he seems to think that cloud seeding causes droughts and causes wildfires because you're dropping rain where it shouldn't be.
		But I guess this is a good way as we got a minute 30 going out to break.
		Are you guys able to cloud seed and have you ever done that to try and stop a forest fire?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So there's a project in California called Project Skyfire back in the 50s or 60s that was trying to reduce the severity of wildfires via cloud seeding.
		And the problem with wildfires is if there's no clouds, then you can't cloud seed, and so you can't reduce We're good to go.
		We developed the technology. We'll get into other applications like wildfire suppression, like severe storm mitigation, like hail mitigation, which is another application of cloud seeding.
		As yet, Rainmaker hasn't done anything to that effect.
		And, you know, I think it was Rep.
		Ritchie from Tennessee, who, great guy, was a fan of him, didn't really grasp how cloud seeding worked, at least in that conversation, and, you know, thought that maybe it was responsible for some of the droughts or wildfires, but that was...
		Baseless, and I hope that we get to have another conversation so that I can help the folks in Tennessee, and Rainmaker can help the folks in Tennessee with cloud seeding.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Well, I personally like to see these laws to limit geoengineering.
		Cloud seeding, I think, should be a different conversation, and that's why we're having this conversation today, to explain to people, because I just did a whole half hour on chemtrails, and now we're doing this on cloud seeding.
		We're going to come back and show some of your testimony here right after this break.
unidentified		Stay tuned....and who you're with, and you'll have three minutes, and then we'll go back with questions and answers.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		You're recognized. My name is Augustus DiRico, and I'm the owner of Rainmaker, a cloud seeding company that makes it rain and snow more over farms, ski resorts, water, and hydroelectric utilities.
		And I'm here today because, in all things, I aspire to be a faithful Christian, and part of that means stewarding creation and stewarding all of what God has put on this green earth.
		I have no intention and no desire to play God, but again, want to serve him.
		And part of what I'm concerned about in Bill 2063 Is that it would prevent Tennessee from stewarding creation with all the tools it has available.
		Part of the bill pertains to stratospheric aerosol injection, which is an altogether different technology from cloud seeding.
		And so I thought that I would talk about what cloud seeding is, what stratospheric aerosol injection is, the differences and the regulatory frameworks that exist in the United States for these industries.
		So first, SAI or SRM, stratospheric aerosol injection or solar radiation management, is, as mentioned before, something that the Biden administration has released a report on.
		It's an attempt to cool the planet by emitting reflective aerosols into the upper atmosphere.
		Although, as a technologist, I'm interested in all sorts of new tools that humanity can use, there have been no large scale, there have been almost none at all operational programs of solar radiation management or SAI. So we have no experimental data as to what its effects would be, even though volcanoes might be modeled to be similar.
		What we do know about SAI is that its effects would be global and the aerosols would stay in the atmosphere for years after emission.
		Once you turn it on, it's hard to turn it off.
		Is any of this true of cloud seeding?
		No, it is not. Cloud seeding is the intentional modification of precipitation from clouds by emitting silver iodide into them.
		Silver iodide has a crystal structure that's almost identical to ice, and so water easily freezes onto it into sufficiently large and heavy ice crystals such that they fall as snow or melt back down into rain.
		Cloud seeding was Unfortunately, Rep.
		Fritz, not invented by the Soviets.
		I think it would be a great disservice to American innovation if we were to credit them with that.
		It was Irving Langmuir, an American physicist in 1946, that discovered it.
		And it has existed since 1946.
		It's been operational and researched since 1946.
		And the resounding body of evidence that we have on its efficacy and safety is that it is safe.
		In areas where cloud seeding has existed for decades, there has been no evidence of it increasing past naturally occurring levels of silver.
		Mind you, not strontium, not aluminum, not sulfur.
		Silver iodide is what is used in cloud seeding operations, none of that which was listed by the other witness.
		And even if it were to bioaccumulate, I have a study there available for you on The minimal effects that it would have, negligible effects that it would have on the environment, on crops, on cattle, and on human health.
		In fact, many people have found that it is so safe and so beneficial that states like Texas, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada, just to name a handful, not only permit cloud seeding to exist, but they pay for it at a state level to benefit their agricultural and water supply interests.
		Moreover, North Dakota Another state that has a cloud seeding program, they estimate a $21 million annual benefit to the state's agriculture from it.
		So I would just ask you, if you are in favor of China having better technology than the United States, I would ask that you vote for this bill as it is.
		If you're in favor of depriving farmers in Tennessee from having the best technology available in other states, I would ask you to vote for the bill as it is.
		I would ask if you are in favor of big government regulating technologies and businesses like mine out of existence, then vote for the bill as it is.
		But if you don't favor any of those things, please consider a permitting process like that which exists in California or Texas or Idaho or Wyoming.
unidentified		Thank you, Mr. Orko. Do we have any questions, comments for our guest?
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		We have Representative Ritchie.
		All right, we'll get back to that later, possibly.
		I thought it was pretty interesting, your biblical approach.
		Pretty smart doing that to the Tennessee legislature, going that route, whereas...
		I think with California, you want to go climate change.
		What are your thoughts on man-made climate change?
		Do you think it's happening?
		Do you think we're actually messing with the environment too much?
		Do you think the things we're doing are good to the environment?
		And do you think we're going in the right direction with all this geoengineering talk?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		You know, I think that one way or another, there's not enough water, you know, Whether it's because of anthropogenic climate change or not.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		And that means that we should adopt all the technologies that can help with that.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And I'm going to stop you right there.
		I thought we had a little more time.
		We're going to pick that up on the way back.
		We need more water.
		We'll be right back. I finally get Chase Geyser's joke.
		He's got the dude doing these liners.
		Cheers, Chase. Good job.
		Hey, man. I've got, like, new information.
		New S has come to light.
		And we've got more information coming from our guests talking about the differences between chemtrails and contrails and cloud seeding.
		And we're going to go through all that.
		We were talking about climate change there as we went to break.
		Augustus Dorico of MakeRain.com, go ahead and give me your analysis on the current climate change debate we're having because this is where the rubber hits the road because what they're trying to do is turn this into more taxes, more More regulations, more anti-human behavior.
		That's where I see the globalists going with it, and that's why regular people are pushing back going, no, I just want to collect rain for my rain barrel.
		I don't want to be taxed for it.
		So go ahead, give us your spiel on climate change, good or bad for the world.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yes, it's pretty peculiar that you're not allowed to collect rain, isn't it?
		Yeah, yeah. But, I mean, I think what I'll say is because we know that cloud seeding exists and because we know that cloud seeding works now more than ever because the technology has been more sophisticated, I think it's indisputable that humans and mankind can modify the weather and can modify the climate, right? The local climate is going to change because the amount of water that the soil can retain will be different.
		I think that if you are emitting any sort of aerosol, whether it's silver iodide or whether it's CO2, it's going to have some impact on the climate, right?
		Poland, I think, showed that in smokestacks for coal plants, right, where they're producing power, downwind of those smokestacks, because of all the steam that was emitted and because of the coal ash that condensed the steam, you'd get consistent streams of precipitation where there was otherwise not a cloud in the sky.
		So no contest, humans and mankind are modifying the climate.
		The question then is, how do we address that and what do we do about it if at any point we accidentally do something that's adverse to our interests?
		The answer can never be degrowth.
		The answer should never be degrowth.
		It should always be A question of engineering our way out of these problems, right?
		Like, can we engineer our way out of any climate crisis?
		I think that with the right technologies, with the right chutzpah, with the right amount of funding, we certainly can.
		And so I am entirely in favor of alternative modes of engineering to solve any problems that we do think that we have or that we do know that we have, so long as they don't result in the degradation of people's quality of life.
		I don't want to see anybody with less access to water.
		I don't want to see anybody taxed into oblivion.
		I don't want to see anybody told that they can't drive a car of their choice just because of some local emission standards.
		We should produce a world that is like a garden planet.
		We should engineer our planet Earth into one that is the most hospitable and the most pro-human possible.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Good answer. I like that.
		I'm going to give out the call-in number.
		Are you interested in taking calls from some of our listeners?
		Yeah. Totally. All right, let's give it out.
		Maybe we'll take two or three calls here as we end this segment, and maybe we'll hold you over to finish up the hour.
		877-789-2539.
		877-789-2539.
		I'm pretty done with most of my clips.
		I got a couple. I want to play this election fraud clip at the end of the hour, so we'll get to that at some point and maybe talk about...
		Turbo cancers, but right now we're talking about chemtrails, we're talking about geoengineering, and we're talking about cloud seeding and the differences between the two.
		Do you get, I guess, so we saw the Tennessee legislature, they weren't quite understanding that cloud seeding was different than the guys spraying stuff in the stratosphere.
		How often do you get pushback from people that don't understand that and don't understand technology that's been around for years?
		I would say almost 100 years, probably close to 80 years at this point, we've had this technology.
		In fact, I had a clip that we played earlier, and I think in the 1950s, people were bitching that the sun was getting blocked out from jets.
		So this has been going on for a while, and that was mainly the soot from the jet fuel, not necessarily from cloud seeding, but go ahead.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		The floor is yours. Yeah, I've gotten my fair share of calls from people that have probably smoked too much weed saying something to the effect of, hey, man, I see the chemtrails above the airport, man.
		Like, is that you? And you know what?
		I think that if I think that there is plenty of reason to be concerned and skeptical about what this technology consists of and what our government is up to and what even private corporations like Rainmaker are up to.
		And people should scrutinize that for good reason.
		So yeah, it's a constant The question of, you know, is this substance toxic?
		Is this substance something that we want in our watersheds?
		Is it going to harm our plants?
		Is it going to give us respiratory problems?
		The answer is always no.
		But because people don't know about it, the onus is on us to talk to them and talk to them earnestly and respectfully because they're smart people that have questions about their own health, their family's health.
		And so, again, it should be scrutinized.
		But yeah, we get a lot of questions like that.
		And I would say if you're curious, I posted a thread just earlier on X.com outlining All of the typical criticisms and questions about cloud seeding.
		Is it toxic? Is it harming the environment?
		Is it sealing rain from one person to give it to another?
		And again, that's probably something worth touching on real quick.
		Only about 9% of the atmospheric water that traverses the continental United States precipitates.
		Most of that either stays condensed as ice in clouds or as liquid water in clouds.
		It either never precipitates and stays condensed and then is recycled into the oceans, or it
		just evaporates off and then never lands on the ground.
		You know, you made the point that the water cycle is a closed loop.
		It is.
		And so the question is then how do we get more of that freshwater into a productive
		human or ecological application?
		And so cloud seeding, you know, 38 or 34 years of data from Utah show that it's net positive.
		Plenty of studies across the world show that it's net positive too.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		You know, I met a guy on one of my snowboard trips who was a...
		He grows wheat.
		And I said, well, how do you irrigate it?
		How much does it cost? He goes, oh, I just wait for it to rain.
		He goes, I don't do any watering of...
		Whatever God's going to give me, he's going to give me.
		But I noticed in your testimony, you talk about Utah being one of the top states in the union that does cloud seeding.
		So... Is it the state that's approaching you?
		Are you approaching the state? Are individual farmers?
		Are farming companies doing it?
		How does that whole process work in terms of getting you to a location to create rain?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So historically, cloud seeding has been done via planes or via ground generators that emit this aerosol up into the clouds.
		The problem is, though, they're not precise, right?
		You're talking about entire watershed supplementation, be it for hydroelectric or water utilities.
		And, you know, that's fine and that's useful, but Rainmaker, because we're using drones, because we're using much more precise radar-based diagnosis of seedable conditions, we're able to, for the first time, target individual farms.
		And as time goes on, we want to become even more and more precise so that we can hit smaller and smaller farms and provide them as much rain and snowpack, if they're interested, as a utility typically would be able to purchase.
		So we work with farmers directly.
		We are responding to solicitations from states, right?
		So it's People that have felt shirked in the past because they knew that cloud seeding was going on and they knew that weather modification was going on and nobody gave them the time of day or said that they were conspiracy theorists.
		I'll tell you, you were right.
		It is going on. My company does it.
		Many other companies do it.
		Nations do it. Utah, directly at a state level, pays for a program.
		Idaho, directly at a state level, pays for a program.
		California has allocated money.
		Even the federal government, right?
		The USDA in the Agricultural Research Service, they've allocated funds for cloud seeding to produce more rain for dryland farmers.
		And so folks that don't have access to the water that they need for dryland farming or for orchards or for cattle ranching, all of those are within the set of folks that we either already are servicing or want to in the future.
		And so we'll do BD, reach out to them directly, get some dip, smoke a cigar with a farmer, or do something a little bit different with a Uh, state official.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		What? Is that like hookers and blow?
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		No, no, no, no.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		It's like, uh, caviar and cocktails.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Okay. Got it. Got it. Got it.
unidentified		All right. We're going to go to some callers.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Of course not. That's not how business is done.
		Only in DC. Um, let's go to John in Michigan wants to talk.
		He has a question about geoengineering.
		Go ahead, John. You're on the air.
unidentified		Yes, thank you. I was just wondering if your guest is familiar with Dane Wigington with GU and IngramWatch.org.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		I am familiar, yeah.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		I'd love to talk to him someday soon because he produces a lot of work keeping tabs on cloud seeding, stratospheric aerosol injection, and the likes.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, and he got into it by being a solar guy and noticing that his solar panels weren't working as well.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		That's what got him down the rabbit hole of what's going on up in our skies.
unidentified		Go ahead, John. But you mentioned that you've not found any toxic elements on the surface from the elements that are being put in the air.
		And I would tend to say that I've noticed that I've been following this since the late 90s up here in northern Michigan, and they just bombed the heck out of us two days ago, and then we have rain in it.
		And the chemicals that they're using do, I think, end up on the ground, according to Dane.
		They choke the roots out because they're using aluminum.
		And you mentioned barium and strontium, but many other things, plastics, surfactants, which are like soaps.
		I had a storm here in 2018.
		It was like sand.
		We had two feet of what was called snow, but it was like sand.
		You couldn't travel anything with a four-wheel drive.
		Did I understand you right when you said that you don't have any fallout from the chemicals that are being used?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		So aluminum, barium, strontium, these are things that people talk about in the context of solar radiation management a lot of the time.
		And I'm not aware of programs that have gone on in Michigan for either cloud seeding or solar radiation management.
		They may have. But what I'll tell you is, in the case of cloud seeding, as much as you can put on your fingertip, Can seed over tens of thousands of acres.
		And about two parts per million of soil in the continental U.S. is already silver.
		And silver iodide is significantly less toxic and harmful to plant life and human life than silver itself.
		After decades of seeding operations over areas of interest, say in, again, Nevada, for example, or Texas, you see about another 80 parts per trillion, so significantly lower than background levels that are naturally occurring.
		And, you know, it's 10 times safer than aspirin.
		It's about 200 milligrams per kilogram that is the 50% lethal dose in the case of aspirin.
		It's about 15 times that in the case of silver iodide.
		So at the very least in the context of cloud seeding, You know, there's no evidence as yet that I've seen from any company, any individuals doing studies on their own data collection from governments that would suggest that cloud seeding has adverse effects on plants.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right, let's go.
		Thanks, John. Thanks for that question.
		Life or human life. Let's go to Mike in Canada.
		Go ahead, Mike. Hi, guys.
unidentified		Thanks for taking my call.
		I really appreciate it. I'm in a small farm, 80-acre farm, just west of Edmonton, the capital of Alberta.
		What are you growing? This year we'll be going to wheat.
		Last year we were at canola.
		And listen, I've got to refute what you're saying here because I'm telling you right now, the aluminum levels in the runoff from the Rocky Mountains has risen 75% in the last 10 years.
		And my crops are stunting here, and I can see it clearly in my headlights when I'm out before...
		Before light in the morning, you can see that the aluminum particles and the other particles dropping down to the ground.
		And I think that the snow itself that we just came through winter here, we're just starting to feel spring here.
		The snow doesn't have any pattern to it.
		It's these little balls.
		And I'm telling you, we're poisoning the planet.
		Anything that we can spray on this planet, the problem that we have is not aerosol issues or global warming.
		We have a pollution problem.
		And we continue to contaminate everything, the air, the soil, the water.
		And as soon as it gets into the groundwater, which I'm having problems with my well now, that's another issue.
		And I'm sure it has something to do with the increasing amount of wildfires because the metallics are laying on the ground and something's igniting them.
		And I've seen this like literally firsthand.
		We had a massive wildfire here not six kilometers from my farm last year and I was actually afraid that we were going to have to batten down the hatches and close up shop and leave.
		So we need to let the earth heal.
		We need to take everything that we're spraying in the air and stop it immediately.
		We need to put everything that we're putting into the ground and stop that immediately and let the earth heal.
		As far as the CO2 emissions from Vehicles and that for global warming, why they're spraying aluminum, barium and strontium into the atmosphere is a ton of hogwash.
		I need my CO2 levels, you know, literally from 4 to 0, excuse me, 0.4 to 0.6% of the total atmosphere in order for my crops to grow healthily.
		So I need to know what your guest needs to say about that because I see it firsthand here and we've got a contamination problem.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Before you answer that, Augustus, we were showing those articles where they basically changed what fuel they're using to, one, I think they were trying to make it less polluting, but then at one point, what they're doing is, as these things are coming out, they're telling the planes where to go, and I think this stuff is going to come out.
		It sounds like what's going on is the chemtrails are going to happen regardless, which is not good.
		We should be working on cleaner fuels, but...
		What's the effect of the chemtrails creating the grid, which then creates clouds?
		That's having another effect, which is blocking the sun, which is not good for your plants either.
		And so sunlight levels are dropping.
		That's the real problem that we're going to see going into the future even more.
		But I think also aluminum, strontium, and bromine coming into your soil is not good.
		But go ahead, Augustus. I'll let you take the rest of that.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Sure. I mean, first and foremost, I'll say any hardship with respect to wildfires, with respect to soil quality, with respect to water quality degradation or lack of access to water, all of that, I will pray for everybody in Canada and all the rest of the farmers in North America, because I want nothing but the best for all of the people that we live around and that we get our food from.
		And I'm super grateful to that. And so I am sorry that any of that is happening if it is difficult.
		Now, that said, glyphosate, right?
		You're a farmer. Glyphosate isn't the healthiest thing in the world to eat, not more so than aluminum, that's for sure.
		But we use and we spray pesticides all over the place.
		We spray herbicides all over the place in our farming, and it's For our benefit and it's for agriculture's benefit.
		We add nitrates to the soil that in excess can cause problems with algae and our water sources.
		So we definitely do add things to the planet that are for its benefit.
		And I think that you and most other farmers, sophisticated chemists that you are, understand that sometimes we can add things that are beneficial.
		Now that said, you also mentioned the concentration of aluminum growing in the Colorado River watershed.
		I think And I think that there is a pollution problem, but it's a question of where the pollution is coming from.
		Is the pollution coming from, is the aluminum and the other metals that are increasingly in our soils, increasingly in our water supply, is the increasing amount of Is it metabolites from, say, birth control in the water supply something that's good?
		No. But what is the source?
		Is it chemtrails? Is it cloud seeding?
		Is it solar radiation management?
		I think it's mostly industrials that are responsible, and not just because they're pumping industrial waste into water supplies, but also because we have industrials all over the dry areas of the country, and when it rains, that ends up In our aquifers, it ends up rushing down into our streams, too.
		So where the aluminum that is harmful is coming from, I'm not exactly sure, but I suspect part of it is from a pollution problem that we absolutely do need to solve for the sake of all of our environments, for the sake of all of our agriculture in North America.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Hey, Mike, I got a question.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Do you spray glyphosate on your wheat?
unidentified		No, we don't. We're trying to go 100% organic here.
		And, you know, the funny thing is, my son is an actual captain for a major airline up here in Canada.
		And up until about 15 years ago, I've been arguing with him that they're spraying something on us.
		What is it? And he says, no, Dad, they're not.
		They're not. And yet, 10 years ago, we found out, yeah, they are.
		They're actually adding it to the jet fuel on commercial flights.
		Not only the, we're talking the military planes that are spraying it on us, but it's I'm about 35 kilometers or, say, 20 miles from the Edmonton International Airport to the northwest, and I'm right in the flight path, and I'm getting X and O'd all day.
		And I can see the stunting of the actual plant itself.
		And even in our home garden, which is about 4,000 or 5,000 square feet, you can see the metallic substances and the actual yield we're getting from it is getting about 10% to 15% lower per year.
		Now, that's not sustainable.
		Within five or six years, we will not be able to grow anything in the soil.
		And it's all coming from the air.
		It's not coming from big spraying programs, because my wife is totally against that, and so am I, to be honest.
		And like I said before, if we don't sit here and smarten up and let the earth heal and quit everything, especially from an aerial perspective, I think we're in big trouble, and mankind is that threat.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I agree with you, Mike.
		We definitely need to work on a better form of fuel.
		The fuel we're using now, it seems like it's serving dual purpose.
		One, to make these planes fly, and the second is to do this geoengineering.
		That seems to be a byproduct of it, which is also harming the environment.
		Thanks for your call. Really appreciate it.
		Let's go to Scott in Massachusetts.
		We got about three and a half minutes left.
unidentified		Go ahead, Scott. Yeah, hey Rob, good to see you on TV. And Augustus, thank you for coming in.
		Now, what you're spraying is silver iodide, is that correct?
		Yes. And nothing else?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		No. Wow.
unidentified		So, basically everything that John Brennan, who's just a total communist pig, is spraying all kinds of pollutants in the air.
		And that's what these farmers are complaining about, and reducing their crop yields, which is a horrible thing, and it's acidifying the ground when it lands, is what I understand.
		Now, eventually, these particles will fall to the ground, and what kind of an effect does the silver iodide have on the soil?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, no. Worthwhile question.
		I'll also even say, like, any metallic compound, any mineral in excess in either soil or in water will have adverse effects if it's in too high a concentration, right?
		Too much copper, too much iron, any of that, it can be problematic.
		Silver iodide, like I said earlier, it's LD50, so the dose where it's toxic is like 3,000 milligrams per kilogram.
		And aspirin is like 200 milligrams per kilogram, so it's significantly safer than that.
		In the case of the most sensitive freshwater algae, like 1.4 milligrams per liter is the toxic threshold.
		You see, after decades of seeding, about 0.0005 milligrams per kilogram added from these campaigns, and that's because as much silver iodide as can fit on the tip of your finger can seed over tens of thousands of acres, so it's extremely diffuse.
		And that said, We have to continue researching this just to make sure that we're abreast of any ecological issues or any agricultural issues that are coming from it.
		But there's no toxic effects from cloud seeding based silver iodide accumulation as far as any literature reports or farmer reports that I've seen.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right. Thank you, Scott.
		Appreciate you. We got about a minute left.
		Let's go ahead, Mike in Tennessee.
		Go ahead, Mike. That's where they just passed the anti-chem trailing bill.
unidentified		Go ahead, Mike. Hey, I appreciate y'all.
		Hey, I think the young guy's onto something.
		I'm not an engineer, but I moved to Tennessee from New York, and you see this cloud, this, not cloud seeding, but dropping aluminum, you know, the chemtrails all the time.
		And aluminum is, you know, it's basically killing the trees.
		It's killing the ground, killing the trees, slowly but surely.
		And I think silver's not a terrible thing.
		If it's a water issue, I say, let's research it, you know?
		Hey, let geoengineeringwatch.org follow behind their plane and test their stuff, you know?
		I mean, I watch Mike Adams.
		The guy puts silver in his drink.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I use silver.
		We also put silver in our toothpaste, Dr.
		Jones Naturals. You could try that, and it's a natural antibiotic.
		Thanks for your call, Mike. We'll be back with more calls with half an hour left in the war room.
		And we're making it rain here.
		The UAE farmers or the UAE technocrats are making it rain in Dubai, flooding it out.
		They're making the desert grow.
		They're blooming it with cloud seeding.
		And we talked about chemtrails, talked about cloud seeding.
		I'm going to play a clip later on today, this election meddling clip.
		And our guest can stay with us or not, but we're going to finish some calls with him.
		Right now it's Augustus DiRico of MakeRain.com.
		I had a question here from our social media guy.
		HAARP systems can do it without any pollution.
		How aware are you of the HAARP antenna array up in Alaska, and there's other arrays around the world, and what they can do with these, I guess, low-wave systems that they do to manipulate the weather?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		How much do you know about HAARP? I'm familiar with HAARP. So there's a project that just went live in the vicinity of Lake Travis in Austin, Texas.
		And there's other research programs like it around the world, particularly in the UAE and the UK, that are concerned with charged particles inducing rainfall as well.
		The extent to which HAARP has done that, a lot of it's classified beyond The scope of what you can find out through public channels, at least.
		So I'm not sure what they've done, although there is reason to believe that If you induce particular charges in the droplets in clouds, you can get them to hit one another with greater frequency and subsequently grow into larger and larger droplets such that they do precipitate.
		So I think, though, where mineral-based cloud seeding, like what the UAE has done, like what most of the programs in the United States do, is what's tried and true.
		It's what we've known about for 78 years, and it's something that we could certainly benefit from.
		I'm all for research into alternative methods to ionize clouds for the sake of enhancing precipitation and modifying the weather for the benefit of farmers and ecosystems.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		And what you're talking about is resonating.
		So you're just adding a little vibration to it.
		So instead of actually putting particulate in there, you're making these things clump together by vibrating.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Is that what you're saying? Have you ever seen that video?
		Or some example of, like, you put a water bottle in a freezer, and the water stays liquid, but it's really cold, and then you shake it, and it all freezes at once.
		Oh, yeah. You seen that?
unidentified		That's the same principle? Exactly.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		If you have the right conditions in cloud, and they're very particular, but if you have the right conditions in cloud, there's reason to believe that through sound waves, through other sorts of vibration, you could condense water droplets into bigger ones.
		Or you could catalyze the freezing of those water crystals that become large enough to fall a snowflake.
		So yeah, that totally tracks.
		That's something that Rainmaker is going to investigate in the future and that other people are actively researching right now across universities in the West, the United States, the UK, France, etc.
		The HAARP example, though, as is the example, or as is true in the example from, like, Travis in Texas, that's different than just vibrating...
		And inducing precipitation percussively, that is changing charge of the particles so that they hit one another more often and aggregate into larger droplets, both of which are things worth researching.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		One quick question, then we'll go back to the calls.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Do cloud-seeded snowflakes look different than natural snowflakes, or is the difference in perceivable?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Certainly not to the naked eye.
		If you look under For an ultra-high-powered microscope, you might be able to see the core of the particle in it.
		But otherwise, the dendrites that grow out from the particle largely look the same as any other snowflake would.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Okay. All right. All right, let's go to Nav in Rhode Island.
		He wants to talk about orgone and the effects on weather.
		This should be interesting. Go ahead, Nav.
unidentified		Hey. So I'm under the impression that over all metropolitan areas in America, the weather is...
		Pretty much under full control.
		And I think this goes back to the early 1900s with Willem Reich and Orgone Energy and what he made was the Orgone cloud accumulator box.
		They would send up hundreds of these boxes in the atmosphere and they could either create a bunch of storms or just take away all the clouds in the area just by flipping the switch on it.
		So I wondered, I wanted to know if you knew about Orgone and what you think about it.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Go ahead, Augustus. Yeah, dude.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Orgone and Organite are very interesting, esoteric potential technologies.
		So first I'll say I haven't seen any data published on them working before.
		I haven't scrutinized all William Reich's work.
		I haven't decided to base my company off I'll also say the notion that every city or every big metropolitan area has totally controlled the weather in its vicinity seems not to be the case only because You know, I grew up in Connecticut. I lived through Hurricane Sandy.
		I lived through Hurricane Irene.
		I want someday for there to be a world wherein we can modify the weather such that, you know, severe hurricanes or droughts aren't as big of an issue as they are.
		I think we can mitigate those.
		But it doesn't seem to be the case yet because a lot of self-interested nations that would deploy the technology if they knew it was available and knew it worked haven't in the last 100 years they've had the opportunity to.
		Again, open to all varieties of research into producing technologies that are more pro-human, but Oregon doesn't yet seem to be something that I'm going to integrate into my business.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right, there you go, Nav.
		Let's go to Aaron in South Carolina.
		Go ahead. Questions about the guest about cloud seeding.
		Go ahead, Aaron. Hey, Augustus.
unidentified		What's your website, man?
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		MakeRain.com.
unidentified		All right. I'm in, dog.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		I'm all in. I'm your partner.
unidentified		I'm going to handle the provocative questions for Rob now.
		Like, I'll just admit to Rob, yes, it's the Antichrist running our systems.
		But we are David and Goliath.
		We're going to go in and we're going to take over.
		Just like you said, we will steward this planet.
		So, hey, and you know what?
		I also need to thank you.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		I need to thank you real quick.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		My mom is grateful.
unidentified		I'm from Cali. And I want to clean the air in L.A., by the way.
		But anyways, my mom grows grapes in Fresno.
		So I'm pretty sure that was you who was seeding those clouds in the Central Valley.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Is that right? We weren't over Fresno.
		We're in the Valley, but not yet deployed in Fresno and happily will be towards the end of the year, I think, though.
		Okay. Well, hey, look, I'm going to hit you up.
unidentified		I'm in. Let's do this.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		We're creating business opportunities.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Hey man, thanks. Yeah, yeah.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		If God is with us, who can be against us, right?
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		There you go. I just want to read this quick quote.
		Rain making or weather control can be a powerful weapon of war as the atom bomb.
		A Nobel Prize winning physicist said it was Dr.
		Irving. Let me get his last name here.
		Dr. Irving Talbot?
		Yeah. Or Curtis Talbot.
		So, these guys...
		Irving Langmuir. Irving Langmuir.
		Okay. Yeah, you're right.
		And that is the...
		He who controls the weather could definitely control the world.
		There's, you know, talk of earthquake weapons.
		We have the low-frequency HAARP arrays.
		Now they're geoengineering.
		There's all these ways that they're trying to play God.
		I think your version of it is definitely one that can be worked with It also can get out of control, as we saw in Dubai.
		Let's go to Brutus.
		You're our last caller for this.
		I think I'm going to drop you off because I want to finish this next segment, the last segment of the War Room.
		But go ahead, Brutus, with cloud seeding and chemtrails.
		Go ahead. Did he hang up?
		Oh, we might have just hung up on him.
		All right. Well, sorry, Brutus.
		You know what? Bring him back up.
		If you bring the call system back up, I'll take his call on the offset.
		But makerain.com is Augustus DiRico's website.
		Thank you for hanging out all this time.
		I think we were just going to do an hour, but we did a little bit longer than that in answering these questions.
		I think there's some misconceptions about your technology.
		I've known about cloud seeding since I was a little kid.
		Weatherman Rob Robin down in Lake Charles used to talk about it all the time.
		And so I think what you're doing is good.
		I think you're coming at it from the right perspective.
		And I'll give you the final thoughts. You've got 30 seconds.
augustus doricko ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, thanks. Thanks for having me on.
		I just want to say that I want America to have the absolute best technology that it can.
		I want it to be competitive with China.
		I want to steward the earth on behalf of bringing glory to God and helping all of our farms and ecosystems thrive in a pro-human way.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		All right. Thank you for joining us, MakeRain.com.
		We'll be right back with our final segment of The War Room.
		Well, I don't know who picked this music, but this is a downer to end the show with.
		I'm finally getting my legs underneath me.
		Thank you for joining us on The War Room.
		This is our last segment.
		Is this what they call shoegaze?
		Is that what this is?
		Anyway, I got Mike from Missouri on.
		I'm going to try to get to your call.
		I want to play this election broad clip first.
		It just popped through my feed.
		What I like, you know, being back on X is seeing the feeds, these nuggets of information making their orbit back around into my purview.
		They might be old, but I think sometimes it's good to reshow this stuff just to Put it back in your mind.
		But before we go to that, I just want to remind you that we are listener-supported.
		It's you out there going to the store, spreading the word, saying prayers that keeps us on the air.
		I can't stress that enough.
		And the products we have are amazing, and we have them at a great price because we cut out the middleman.
		So we're direct selling to you.
		So when you go there and buy these products, you're getting the best price that you could possibly get, and you're getting a good product because Alex Jones strives for quality.
		And I just want to let you know that Vitamin Mineral Fusion is back, 40% off.
		Alex had a great idea.
		You make a pitcher of this. So you put a pitcher in your fridge with some water and you put a couple scoops in and mix it up.
		So when your kids are thirsty, they're getting vitamins and maybe a little bit of sweet stuff, just a very small amount, instead of like Kool-Aid, which is, you know, vitamin C, but like probably a crappy version of vitamin C and then a bunch of dyes and other things that aren't good for them or juice, which is mainly just a bunch of sugar.
		And it's been sitting around for forever.
		So here's something you can make with filtered water.
		You know where the water's coming from because you've been filtering it.
		Get your vitamin mineral fusion 40% off infowarsstore.com.
		Infowarsstore.com. And don't forget, Bodies is back.
		It's great for inflammation.
		It's got pepperine in it that helps it absorb better.
		It's also 40% off.
		And DNA Force is almost out of stock.
		It's saying it's 40% off, 50% off on there, but it's saying 40% off on the store.
		It's still a great deal.
		PQQ, CoQ10, check it out now.
		They may have switched the price already since we've been there, but check that all out.
		Infowarsstore.com, it supports everything we're doing.
		Look, there it is. Now, 50% off.
		See? You let the store know they fix it.
		So there it is. Get yours today.
		I take DNA force and bodies, two items I take every day, along with the other stuff that I do.
		So let's go to this clip from the Georgia County Commissioner election fraud.
unidentified		Here it is. Voters went to the polls to vote on a local county commissioner race in District 2 between Lauren Alexander, Marshall Orson, and Michelle Longspears.
		The end result from the Dominion machine showed Lauren Alexander received 34.67% of the vote, Marshall Orson receiving 41.35% of the vote, and Michelle Longspears receiving 23.98% of the vote.
		In Georgia, if one candidate doesn't get above 50% of the vote total, a runoff election is automatically held between the two top candidates, meaning Michelle Longspears was cut out of the race.
		But Michelle Longspears felt odd about the numbers, so she visited different precincts to double-check the tallies.
		Guess what? She noticed that in some precincts she didn't receive a single vote.
		But how is that possible that a candidate with 24% of the vote total finds precincts where she didn't receive a single vote?
		While statistically alarming, the real surprise came when she realized there was not one vote cast for her in her own precinct.
		The same one where she and her husband voted for herself.
		Spears immediately demanded a hand recount of the results and got one.
		On June 1st, the results were released.
		And the difference between the Dominion machine count and the hand count was shocking.
		After the hand count, Lauren Alexander gained 355 votes, Orson lost 1,298 votes, and Spears actually gained 3,620 votes, making her the new runoff candidate.
		And here's the best part.
		When you add them all up, the hand count shows 2,110 votes more than the Dominion machines reported on the 24th.
		This is huge. In a small county commissioner's race, with 15,500 votes total, the Dominion machine tally was short by nearly 3,000 votes.
		What does that say about all the other races that were conducted on these very same machines?
		This is proof that the machines cannot be trusted.
		If Spears had not sounded the alarm, no one would have ever known.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		So what's interesting about that is if you extrapolate that out for every 15,000 votes, you're missing 3,000.
		That's a lot. You know there's something going on.
		We may not have all the answers, but we could tell from the night that there's something wrong and Joe Biden should not be in there.
		It's totally ridiculous. Let's go to Mike in Missouri.
		Go ahead, Mike. You want to talk about Kim Trails?
		Go ahead. I'll talk about that with you all day.
unidentified		Hey. You're just talking about voter fraud here, and I grew up in Clintons, Missouri.
		Okay. I mean, Arkansas, in northwest Arkansas, in the 70s and 80s, and we were a one-party state from the 1870s until about 1998.
		And, I mean, it was always fixed.
		Anything that they wanted, they got, including the Tysons.
		The Walmart folks, you know, and the Tyson people talking about pollution, you know, you had your previous guest on about making rain and talking about pollution.
		Well, Arkansas was polluted mightily by the Tysons through the Clintons when they passed laws that said that the chicken farmers could just spread their chicken litter on anywhere, anyplace, anytime, and it got nitrates into the water.
		And then Don Tyson was able to parlay all the money there and make more money.
		And then he was bringing cocaine through on his own trucks.
		He was a drug runner, but he was also an illegal alien runner.
		He would use the same trucks to bring in illegal aliens into Arkansas.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Bring his workforce in to work the chicken slaughterhouses.
unidentified		Absolutely. It was going all the way from about, oh, probably 1982 or 83.
		And I can pinpoint that to when that's when our illegal alien problem really started getting out of control.
		And in northwest Arkansas, we had a huge population growth increase from about 1985 to the present.
		It has just grown like crazy.
		And it is one of the fastest growing regions in the nation.
		And I don't know if...
		Everybody in the United States knows that or not, but a lot of people are moving there, but three corporations pretty much run it.
		You've got J.B. Hunt is there, Intermodal.
		You've got Walmart World Headquarters.
		You have Tyson who now is ran by John R.
		Who is the third Tyson, which is the grandson of Don Tyson.
		And he's about as useless as Don was, from what I understand.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Well, and what you see though, we played that clip earlier of Alex
		talking about stuff that 20 years ago is still going on now.
		So this stuff was going on in the 80s and it's still going on now.
		It's just a little different.
		It's got an iPhone overlay over it, essentially.
		And it's crazy.
		Nothing really changes.
		There's always going to be corruption.
		That's why we always have to be vigilant.
		I've got to cut you off because I want to go to this last clip.
		This is Dr.
		McCullough on turbo cancer.
		And people really need to hear this because there's a lot of, oh, there's no turbo cancer.
		Here it is. Here's Dr. McCullough giving it to you.
		Three ways these COVID shots are giving you cancer.
dr peter mccullough ▲ ● ▼		Here it is. Go. The multi-hit hypothesis of oncogenesis after COVID-19 vaccination.
		What does that mean? It means that COVID-19 vaccines, largely messenger RNA vaccines, the messenger RNA itself can impair DNA repair.
		So it can actually begin to tip the scale towards cancer promotion in cells.
		The spike protein, the S2 segment, which one actually gets from the vaccine and not from the infection, the S2 segment in a paper by Singh and Singh from University of Pittsburgh appears to inhibit the P53 and BRCA Tumor suppressor systems.
		Our natural tumor surveillance systems are impaired.
		And if one has a loss of function mutation in either one of these, a woman would recognize this as, quote, being BRCA positive.
		That would be a loss of function mutation in this surveillance system.
		That could predispose somebody to a cancer, particularly breast and female reproductive cancers.
		And then lastly, A recent finding that the messenger RNA vaccines, both Pfizer and Moderna, have DNA process-related impurities.
		And at least four labs have described this.
		Two papers, one by Spiekler and the other by McKernan, have identified Elevated levels of DNA fragments and size of the fragments that are considered process related impurities.
		They come from circular pieces of DNA used that have the code for the messenger RNA. They're in the form of a plasmid in E. coli and the fragments that are detected are the SV40 Enhancer, promoter, and origin of insertion, as well as an antibiotic resistance fragments that are used in the manufacturing process.
		The reason why SV40 is important, it stands for simian virus 40.
		This is a known proto-oncogene activator.
		So in summary, The COVID vaccines have at least three mechanisms by which they could start a cancer or they could promote an existing cancer, and it may occur more rapidly because tumor defense systems are taken down.
		That's what we call turbo cancer.
rob dew ▲ ● ▼		Turbo cancer. There it is.
		Thank you for joining me. Follow me on X at Deuce News, D-W-S-N-E-W-Z. Spread the word about this show and all of our shows.
		InfoWars.com forward slash show.
unidentified		Survival Shield X3, now back and better than ever with a whopping 40% discount.
		It's your ticket to a healthier you, powered by the might of activated tri-iodine.
		Picture this, a product derived from ancient sea salts buried deep beneath the earth, harnessing a cutting-edge process that stabilizes iodine in a groundbreaking tri-iodine formula.
		Imagine waking up feeling rejuvenated, your body's processes humming smoothly like a well-oiled machine, all thanks to Survival Shield X3. This isn't just a step up from the old nascent iodine system, it's a quantum leap in health supplementation designed with you, the patriot, in mind.
		Survival Shield X3 has got your back, providing peace of mind and body in these uncertain times.
		Head over to InfowarsStored.com and witness the transformation for yourself.
		This is more than just a supplement.
		It's your shield, your protector, your Survival Shield X3. Don't wait.
		Take control of your health today and step into a brighter, healthier future.
		Visit InfowarsStored.com and get yours today.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		Not all energy drinks, not all energy powders, not all energy pills are made equal.
		A lot of them out there work really well.
		They wake you up and for a long time.
		The problem is they have a horrible letdown and they have ingredients in them that are not good for your body.
		TurboForce was developed by one of the top scientists, sports, nutrition experts in the country.
		And obviously because of all the attacks on M4s, it was a private contract.
		But we paid him to develop what he believed with the ingredients available would be the best, cleanest, long-term, 10-hour clean energy.
		And we were able to develop turbo force.
		Only takes a little bit, and it time releases.
		Hits in about 30 minutes, but the different natural compounds that are in it synergistically work to give you energy on average for 10 hours with no letdown.
		Now, that doesn't mean if you end up not sleeping all night on it, you're not going to be tired the next day.
		But if you take it in the morning, say, and then work till midnight, I have no hangover from it.
		My crew doesn't. The listeners love it.
		So I want to encourage all the viewers and listeners out there that want to support the broadcast.
		At the same time, get an incredible product.
		Go to InfoWarsStore.com today and peruse the site.
		And while you're there, get a canister of TurboForce.
		We used to have it in little individual serving packets, but most folks told us the full packet was too much.
		So now it's in a single scooper, and this formula is even stronger.
		That's why it's TurboForce+.
		Ladies and gentlemen, TurboForce doesn't just boost Your focus and your clarity and your stamina and your libido and so much more.
		It doesn't just do it in a clean, focused way.
		It also funds the Infowar.
		Are there a few other energy drinks and energy mixes out there that are, quite frankly, just as good?
		Yeah. This guy that developed ours developed those as well.
		But this is in the top three or four in the world.
		It works the best and it funds the Infowar.

▲