Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it's Tuesday, March 12, 2024. | ||
| 238 days till the presidential election, and this is your election headquarters. | ||
| The InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now, we got some news to cover today. | ||
| We're going to cover some news out of the RNC. The exchange is underway. | ||
| The reforming is underway of the RNC under Watley and co-chair Laura Trump. | ||
| And I get the feeling that Watley was kind of just the front man with Trump, kind of like, yeah, he's a bit of an establishment guy, so we'll kind of have a bit of an establishment heir in Watley. | ||
| But it looks like Laura might really be running the deal. | ||
| I'll talk about that, which I think is a good thing. | ||
| So we'll talk about that. | ||
| Big news coming out of Haiti, and this has kind of slowly been developing. | ||
| And then there was a hearing today at the Capitol on some things that are happening in Haiti, as well as some other breaking news. | ||
| So we're going to cover that. | ||
| Could the situation in Haiti bleed over into the United States? | ||
| Well, some are concerned that might be the case. | ||
| And since we have an open border, it's obviously a good cause for concern. | ||
| The hearing on the TikTok ban is set to take place tomorrow morning. | ||
| There are some updates and developments in that situation that we're going to be covering as well. | ||
| We have some political developments. | ||
| The Republican Party is attempting to self-sabotage in multiple ways ahead of the presidential election. | ||
| And it's just crazy. So Mitch McConnell says, oh, I'm stepping down. | ||
| But he's really not stepping down. | ||
| It's just all ceremonial. | ||
| He's really waiting until the election season is over. | ||
| And then he wasn't going to be the Senate leader for the Republicans in the next congressional session anyway. | ||
| So it's really just a fake resignation. | ||
| It's really just a fake step down. | ||
| But then they get rid of Santos, and now Ken Buck is announcing he's going to be stepping down. | ||
| It's just total self-sabotage. | ||
| And so we've learned more about that. | ||
| We'll talk about that. | ||
| And then Rand Paul, who looks like is going to be the next Senate leadership of the Republican Party, is directly calling Trump out for endorsing one Mike Rogers, saying he's a deep state supporter. | ||
| Spy state candidate. | ||
| And then he shows the evidence, so we'll be talking about that as well. | ||
| I got a couple guests coming up today. | ||
| We're going to be joined by one Dr. | ||
| Joseph Sansone, who has filed a writ of mandamus in Florida. | ||
| The Florida Supreme Court seeking to compel Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody to ban entirely the COVID-19 shots. | ||
| There's a chance it could go through from what we've heard from Rhonda Santos and Ashley Moody on the COVID-19 vaccine, not to mention the Surgeon General of Florida. | ||
| There's a chance this could go through. | ||
| So Dr. Joseph Sansone is going to be talking about that. | ||
| And then we're going to have some breaking news. | ||
| In the final segment of today's show with Brianna Morello, she has an exclusive story she wants to break on this show dealing with the political persecution and arrests that the Biden administration is engaging in and plans to engage in in the very near future. | ||
| So we have all that coming up. | ||
| But the big story today, Robert Herr, Special Counsel Robert Herr, who said Biden committed multiple crimes, but I'm not going to be charging him, Testified today, his hearing was today, in front of Congress, the House Judiciary Committee, And it was definitely fiery. | ||
| It was very telling of a couple things that our country is going through right now. | ||
| We're going to be playing tons of highlights of that. | ||
| I'm going to be giving you my breakdown of that. | ||
| I think that's the big news of today. | ||
| So that's what we're going to lead into the show with, and then all the other news to follow. | ||
| It's the InfoWars War Room, your election headquarters, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com, the fastest three hours on the internet today. | ||
| Starts when we return from this short break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There is a man who is whatever America needs him to be. | |
| Not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need. | ||
| Nothing less than a knight. | ||
| Shining. They'll hunt him. | ||
| They'll set the dogs on him. | ||
| Because the truth is the greatest threat they face. | ||
| It's the war room. | ||
| with Owen Schreier. | ||
| ♪♪♪ ♪♪♪ | ||
| ♪♪♪ Ladies and gentlemen, today, Special Counsel Robert Herr | ||
| testified in front of Congress. | ||
| His findings investigating Joe Biden having and handling multiple files of classified documents. | ||
| Now a brief recap of what was investigated and what was found. | ||
| Joe Biden had multiple files, folders of classified information. | ||
| Some was at the house where Hunter Biden was living at the time when Hunter Biden was allegedly | ||
| addicted to crack and other drugs and also appeared to be working for Joe Biden as a | ||
| mule running the middleman operations between Joe Biden getting pay for play favors for | ||
| foreign internationals. | ||
| And then also at the Penn Biden Center in Pennsylvania where there were also known Chinese | ||
| nationals to be working. | ||
| Not to mention Joe Biden's ghostwriter getting shared some of the classified information | ||
| for Joe Biden's memoir that Joe then ordered that author to erase. | ||
| So we're talking about illegally taking classified documents, including Senate documents, which leads a million other questions, how he was able to attain those as a vice president. | ||
| But so we're talking about Acquiring and holding on to classified documents, but then also sharing classified documents. | ||
| All of which Robert Herr alleges Joe Biden was guilty of, according to his findings, but didn't recommend charges because of Joe Biden's memory problems and mental problems. | ||
| Now, all of this was addressed in the hearing. | ||
| And before I go to some of these clips, I want to just kind of recap, generally speaking, what went down today. | ||
| Because the whole thing was a rather disgusting, despicable display. | ||
| And this is typical. | ||
| It's just way too typical for what we have to endure and deal with In hearings like this, it became nothing but a politicized hearing. | ||
| It proves once again there is indeed a two-tiered justice system in this country and that Democrats, specifically in this case, Joe Biden, is above the law. | ||
| It also showed that the Democrats can't get over their Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
| And they turned this hearing, which is about classified documents held by Biden, into a hearing about Donald Trump. | ||
| And almost every Democrat used their time speaking to bring up Donald Trump. | ||
| Now keep in mind, this hearing is not about an investigation into Donald Trump. | ||
| This hearing is not about the documents that Trump allegedly had. | ||
| Special Counsel Robert Herr is not there to talk about Donald Trump. | ||
| Donald Trump is not even there to defend himself and has no legal representation there to defend himself. | ||
| They turned a hearing on the Biden classified documents case into a hearing on the Trump documents case. | ||
| Now, the Republicans perhaps should have been prepared for that, but it should have never gone that way to begin with. | ||
| Because now, you're dealing with a situation where you're forced to defend Trump instead of get down to the bottom of why special counsel Herr found Biden guilty but didn't recommend charges. | ||
| And there are a lot of questions that should follow. | ||
| The Democrats also used their time to talk about January 6th. | ||
| Again, not on trial here. | ||
| Even if you do want to obsess over that, even if you do want to make your case for that, this was a hearing on the Biden classified documents. | ||
| Now, so left out of the discussion, since the Republicans weren't prepared for this, and it's not even that I blame them, it's just the truth, Joe Biden was not the president of the United States when he took the documents. | ||
| Donald Trump was the President of the United States when he took the documents. | ||
| He is protected by the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| He's also protected by precedent set by Amy Berman Jackson in the Clinton case. | ||
| And Amy Berman Jackson is a hardcore leftist Democrat. | ||
| So, that precedent's already been set. | ||
| But that's what the Democrats chose to use their time with and the Republicans had other | ||
| uses for their time, so they didn't even bring that up in the hearing today. | ||
| So that back and forth was not even had. | ||
| It shouldn't have needed to be had, but then there it was, the Democrats attacking Trump, | ||
| making it all about Trump, making it all about January 6th. | ||
| All kinds of misrepresentations. | ||
| As I'm watching this, I'm asking myself two obvious questions. | ||
| I'm asking myself two obvious questions. | ||
| You have to wonder. | ||
| Now, Robert Herr, the Republicans, or, well, the Democrats brought this up multiple times because I guess they think it adds weight to the Biden defense, that Robert Herr is a Republican. | ||
| But you have to ask yourself two questions after this hearing. | ||
| So the Democrats dismiss all of Biden's activities and the argument being that he just didn't know He didn't have a memory or a recollection. | ||
| And according to the law, you have to willingly, you have to willingly or wittingly or know what you're doing when you take the classified documents. | ||
| In other words, if it's an accident or you didn't know it was legal, whatever, I guess that's some sort of defense that they're arguing here. | ||
| Now, I would ask, do you think that you or Trump would receive that same treatment and consideration? | ||
| Of course you wouldn't. In fact, I happen to know that for a fact. | ||
| All these people that cover my legal case say Schroyer violated his probation. | ||
| No, actually, I didn't. | ||
| If you read my probation, it says, does not ban me from being in the Capitol, does not ban me from being in D.C. None of that. | ||
| That's all fake. It says, I cannot enter Capitol grounds To willfully disrupt a congressional hearing. | ||
| We wanted the congressional hearings on January 6th to go down because we wanted an investigation of the mail-in ballots and how states' constitutions were violated when they changed election rules and laws without going through the state's Congress. | ||
| So why would I go there to disrupt the hearing that I'm in support of? | ||
| Of course I wouldn't. So it was... | ||
| You might argue that this is standard text for some laws in D.C., But so I ask, would Donald Trump or you receive the same treatment and consideration? | ||
| The answer is no. | ||
| I know from experience. | ||
| And when we argued that in front of a judge, and when we argued that to the prosecution and to the feds, they didn't care. | ||
| And of course Trump wouldn't receive the same treatment and consideration. | ||
| We've already seen that as well from the Democrats. | ||
| So, okay. So the answer is, the same treatment and consideration that Biden is getting, you would not receive, and Trump is not receiving. | ||
| That's two-tiered justice. | ||
| Here's the other question. | ||
| Why is it that Republicans, like supposedly Robert Herr is, approach these politicized cases lightly and attempt to avoid any results, even if crimes are committed, yet Democrats will make up crimes, commit crimes, and then pursue their political opposition relentlessly? | ||
| Why is that? Well, I think we have to really... | ||
| Consider a couple things here. | ||
| One, I think that, on average, a Republican has enough understanding of the system, the dangers of politicized cases, and general rules and regulations, and rapport even, That they know if they start going after their political opposition or they start using these cases to pursue Democrats, that that can really do damage to our political system and the trust in it and weaponize the government. | ||
| Even if it is legitimate. | ||
| Even if it is crimes that they're going after. | ||
| Republicans... Avoid political cases and results like this simply because they know how dangerous it is to politicize or weaponize government, even if it is justified. | ||
| Yet Democrats will make crimes up. | ||
| They will lie about their political opposition. | ||
| They will lie about things like the value of Mar-a-Lago or rape or anything else to go after their political opposition and then relentlessly pursue Illegitimately, their political opposition. | ||
| So right there, it shows you the difference from the very core of these two parties. | ||
| Republicans understand and respect the dangers of what could be viewed as politicized justice or weaponized government, whereas the Democrats are all on board with Weaponizing the government against their political opposition, and they have no shame in it. | ||
| So then the question becomes, well, who gives first? | ||
| Do the Republicans then decide, okay, well, if this is the game Democrats are going to play, then we have to play it too? | ||
| Or will the Democrats finally relent and say, we've gone out of control here, we've turned into tyrants and authoritarians, we've weaponized the government, we better stop, this is too dangerous. | ||
| Ha! Ha! Of course I say that facetiously because we know that's not going to happen. | ||
| So are Republicans ever going to get serious? | ||
| Robert Hurd obviously is not the one. | ||
| Are the Republicans ever going to go tit for tat? | ||
| Are they ever going to get serious? But let's be clear. | ||
| It's the same issue with Donald Trump. | ||
| Donald Trump is not seeking revenge against his political enemies. | ||
| Donald Trump is not becoming an authoritarian. | ||
| It's justice to go after the Bidens for the crimes they've committed. | ||
| That's justice. | ||
| It's justice to investigate Letitia James who runs on persecuting Donald Trump and then | ||
| does it when she gets into office when there's been no crimes. | ||
| It's justice to investigate a Judge Njeran who says Mar-a-Lago is worth $18 million, | ||
| total fraud against Donald Trump. | ||
| That's not revenge. | ||
| That's not authoritarianism. | ||
| That's justice. | ||
| But again, Republicans are so afraid, and maybe that's a good thing up to this point. | ||
| Republicans are so afraid to weaponize the government against their opposition because | ||
| they know how dangerous it is, yet they're sitting here watching Democrats do that exact | ||
| thing illegitimately. | ||
| Republicans won't even do it when it's legitimate. | ||
| And the Democrats sit here and do it illegitimately. | ||
| So what gives first? The Democrats finally relenting, realizing what they're doing is so dangerous, or the Republicans realizing that if they don't respond accordingly, then it'll become a one-party country, and then the United States will be gone by the year 2030. | ||
| Yes, that is correct. | ||
| The Democrat Party and the United States of America cannot coexist. | ||
| One will be extinct by the year 2030. | ||
| So this is what we learn. | ||
| This is what we observe from these hearings. | ||
| Specifically, the Robert Herr special counsel hearing today. | ||
| Now, let's go to some of these clips. | ||
| Let's start with Jim Jordan chairing the committee and the hearing today. | ||
| Here's his statement, opening it up in clip six. | ||
| Pursuant to an agreement with the Ranking Member Nadler and without objection, Chairman Comer and Ranking Member Raskin will be permitted to participate in today's hearing for the purposes of making opening statements and asking questions of the witness. | ||
| They each will receive three minutes for an opening statement and five minutes to question the witness. | ||
| The chair now recognizes himself for an opening statement. | ||
| Robert Hur was appointed special counsel on January 12, 2023. | ||
| He had a fundamental question to address. | ||
| Did Joe Biden unlawfully retain classified information? | ||
| The answer? Yes, he did. | ||
| Page one of Mr. Herr's report, he says this. | ||
| Our investigation uncovered evidence that President Biden willfully retained and disclosed classified materials after his vice presidency when he was a private citizen. | ||
| He further writes, Mr. | ||
| Biden willfully retained marked classified documents about Afghanistan and handwritten notes in his notebooks which he stored in unsecure places in his home. | ||
| Joe Biden kept classified information and Joe Biden failed to store classified information properly. | ||
| Mr. Herr made these determinations after interviewing 147 witnesses. | ||
| He examined 7 million documents, including emails, text messages, photographs, videos, toll records, and other materials from both classified and unclassified sources. | ||
| But there's more. Joe Biden not only kept information he wasn't allowed to keep, and he not only failed to secure that information properly, he also shared it with people who weren't allowed to see it. | ||
| Shared that information with his ghostwriter. | ||
| And remember, this is information that only individuals with a security clearance are supposed to see. | ||
| Mr. Heard told us on page 200 of his report that it's the kind of information that, quote, risk serious damage to America's national security. | ||
| And what did Joe Biden have to say about all this? | ||
| What was his explanation? | ||
| On page 94 of Mr. | ||
| Heard's report, Joe Biden said he took his notebooks with him after his vice presidency because, quote, they're mine. | ||
| And every president before me has done the same exact thing. | ||
| Never mind the fact that he had never been president when he took this information. | ||
| But what comes through is Joe Biden felt he was entitled. | ||
| You can almost hear it. | ||
| You can feel the arrogance in this statement. | ||
| They're mine. But even with all that, Mr. | ||
| Hurd chose not to bring charges. | ||
| Because, quote, Mr. | ||
| Biden would likely present himself to a jury as he did in our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory. | ||
| A forgetful old man who Mr. | ||
| Hurst said did not remember when he was vice president, forgetting on the first day of the interview when his term ended, and forgetting on the second day of the interview when his term as vice president began. | ||
| Mr. Herb produced a 345-page report. | ||
| But in the end, it boils down to a few key facts. | ||
| Joe Biden kept classified information. | ||
| Joe Biden failed to properly secure classified information. | ||
| And Joe Biden shared classified information with people he wasn't supposed to. | ||
| Joe Biden broke the law. | ||
| But because he's a forgetful old man who would appear sympathetic to a jury, Mr. | ||
| Herr chose not to bring charges. | ||
| Now, let's try to be neutral and think rationally with all of this. | ||
| You might understand what Herr is arguing in his conclusion. | ||
| You might even agree. | ||
| He might have a point that, hey, if this comes to a jury, Especially in D.C. They're going to buy it and he's going to be considered a forgetful old man and then there'll be reasonable doubt so we just can't do it. | ||
| Also, we don't want to get into politicized justice because where does it begin? | ||
| Where does it end with this case? | ||
| The problem is this is not an isolated incident. | ||
| And if the Democrats weren't pursuing Donald Trump for the crimes that Joe Biden committed that Trump didn't commit, then maybe you could buy into that. | ||
| But that's not the playing field we're on here. | ||
| Here's James Comer interviewing her about these issues in clip 5. | ||
| In August 2022, President Biden questioned in a 60 Minutes interview how anyone can be that irresponsible when asked about classified documents in the possession of former President Trump. | ||
| But when President Biden said this, he knew that he had stashed classified materials in several unsecured locations for years dating back to his time as vice president and even as a U.S. senator. | ||
| President Biden, the White House, and his personal attorneys have not been honest with the American people about his willful retention of classified material and continue to hide information from Congress. | ||
| President Biden's attorneys claim to have first discovered classified material at Penn Biden Center on November 2, 2022. | ||
| However, President Biden and his lawyers kept it secret from the American people before the midterm elections. | ||
| CBS News broke the story in January 2023, leaving Americans to wonder if the White House had any intention of ever disclosing that President Biden hoarded classified documents for years. | ||
| One of my first actions after becoming chairman of the House Oversight Committee was to launch an investigation into President Biden's mishandling of classified documents. | ||
| This investigation started before Special Counsel Herr was named. | ||
| And what we found is alarming. | ||
| Information obtained through multiple transcribed interviews conducted by the oversight committee contradict the White House's and President Biden's personal attorney's narrative about the discovery of classified documents at the Penn Biden Center. | ||
| In fact, the real timeline began in the spring of 2021, not November 2022, as the White House claimed. | ||
| Additionally, the classified documents were not kept in a locked closet, as asserted by the White House. | ||
| We've also learned that five White House employees and a Department of Defense employee were involved in the early stages of coordinating the organizing, moving, and removing of boxes that were later found to contain classified materials. | ||
| There's no reasonable explanation as to why so many White House employees were concerned with retrieving boxes they believed only contained personal documents and materials. | ||
| Why did President Biden keep these specific documents in unsecure locations for years? | ||
| Many questions remain, but now the White House is obstructing Congress as we seek the truth for the American people. | ||
| We've subpoenaed former White House counsel Dana Remus to appear for a deposition to provide information to our committee, but the White House is seeking to block her testimony. | ||
| We've also subpoenaed the Department of Justice for audio recordings and transcript of President Biden's interview with special counsel Hur. | ||
| These were due the morning of the State of the Union. | ||
| Only this morning, a couple of hours before today's hearing, the Department of Justice finally provided the transcript of President Biden's interview with special counsel Hur. | ||
| The timing is not coincidental. | ||
| Although we've had little time to review the transcripts from what we have seen, it is clear that the White House did not want Special Counsel Herr's final report to be released. | ||
| The White House has refused to be transparent with the American people about the president's mishandling of classified documents. | ||
| And worse, they have appeared to have lied about the timeline, about who handled the documents, and even about the contents of President Biden's interview with Special Counsel Herr. | ||
| That is why today's hearing is important. | ||
| Transparency is what we seek today, and we look forward to Special Counsel HERS' testimony. | ||
| I yield back. We've still got a lot to come from this hearing, a lot more clips. | ||
| And look, believe me, I understand how this whole thing is nauseating. | ||
| I understand how upsetting it is to watch how crooked and corrupt the Democrats are involved. | ||
| But I'm going to explain why it's not all negative. | ||
| As well as we continue to cover this hearing from today. | ||
| We'll be right back. We're going to go back to some clips from today's hearing. | ||
| Special Counsel Robert Herr found Biden committed three crimes but would not suggest charges because he's a forgetful old man with memory and mental problems and no jury would convict him. | ||
| Maybe there's something to that. Or maybe there's something in common when James Comey said nobody in their right mind would pursue charges against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Is that because they know they would end up... | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| No. Couldn't be the case. | ||
| Here's Jim Jordan talking about the ghostwriter that got classified information illegally from Joe Biden in clip 7. | ||
| This is a quote. | ||
| Joe Biden risked serious damage to America's national security when he shared information with his ghostwriter. | ||
| Shared it with his ghostwriter, the guy who was helping Joe Biden get $8 million. | ||
| And oh, by the way, Mr. | ||
| Herr, what did that ghostwriter do with the information Joe Biden shared with him on his laptop? | ||
| What did he do after you were named special counsel? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Chairman, if you're referring to the audio recordings that Mr. | |
| Zwanitzer created of his conversations with... | ||
| Exactly what I'm referring to. He slid, if I remember correctly, he slid those files into his recycle bin on his computer. | ||
| Tried to destroy the evidence, didn't he? | ||
| The very guy who was helping Joe Biden get the $8 million, the $8 million Joe Biden used, the motive for Joe Biden to disclose classified information, to retain classified information, which he definitely knew was against the law. | ||
| Now, Kelly Armstrong really emerged today, did a great job at this hearing. | ||
| Let's go back to back. | ||
| Here's three powerful clips. | ||
| From Congressman Kelly Armstrong's time questioning Robert Herr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Did Mr. Biden have 30 years experience handling this information? | |
| He received advice from at least two separate councils, the National Archives staff. | ||
| He has demonstrated enough knowledge of the law to attack President Trump in public over the same exact issue in detail. | ||
| This is where I get into this. | ||
| I just have a problem with this. | ||
| In your report and this testimony, a reasonable person would conclude that Mr. | ||
| Biden knowingly retained national defense information and failed to deliver it to an appropriate government official, and that he knew his conduct was unlawful. | ||
| And I think that's where we end up here, and that's what the point is. | ||
| Over the last three election cycles, there's only been three people who have ran for president. | ||
| Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Donald Trump. | ||
| All three of them have been accused of mishandling classified documents. | ||
| Only one of them has been prosecuted. | ||
| And that's what the American people see. | ||
| That's what we see. We had Hillary Clinton who ran a program called Bleach It on our server. | ||
| They used hammers to destroy evidence. | ||
| Joe Biden has a 50-year history of misplacing classified documents in numerous different places. | ||
| All of these cases have the same underlying elements of the crime, the same fact patterns, and yet we only see one person being prosecuted. | ||
| And with that, I yield back to the gentleman from Kentucky. | ||
| In your report and this testimony, a reasonable person would conclude that Mr. | ||
| Biden knowingly retained national defense information and failed to deliver it to an appropriate government official, and that he knew his conduct was unlawful. | ||
| And I think that's where we end up here, and that's what the point is. | ||
| Over the last three election cycles, there's only been three people who have ran for president. | ||
| Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, Donald Trump. | ||
| All three of them have been accused of mishandling classified documents. | ||
| Only one of them has been And only one has been president. | ||
| That's what we see. We had Hillary Clinton who ran a program called Bleach It on our server. | ||
| They used hammers to destroy evidence. | ||
| Joe Biden has a 50-year history of misplacing classified documents in numerous different places. | ||
| All of these cases have the same underlying elements of the crime, the same fact patterns, and yet we only see one person being prosecuted. | ||
| And with that, I yield back to the gentleman from Kentucky. | ||
| Mr. Hur, classified documents were found at the Penn-Biden Center? | ||
| That's correct. They were found in President Biden's garage? | ||
| In Wilmington, Delaware, yes. | ||
| And in his basement den? Also in the same home, yes. | ||
| And his main floor office? | ||
| Correct. And his third floor den? | ||
| Correct. At the University of Delaware? | ||
| Correct. And at the Biden Institute? | ||
| Correct. My goodness. | ||
| Quite a lot of places for those classified illegal documents to be. | ||
| But remember, Hillary Clinton was never president. | ||
| She didn't have the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| Joe Biden was not president when he acquired and held these documents and shared them. | ||
| He doesn't have the protection of the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| Big difference there. | ||
| Trump, on the other hand, does. | ||
| Hey, let's not get laws and consistency in the way of a good witch hunt against Donald Trump. | ||
| Let's not get any of that in the way of a good persecution of the Democrats' opposition. | ||
| The Democrats had their time, too. | ||
| Here's Adam Schiff, the pencil-neck, watermelon-head, biological wonder. | ||
| Adam Schiff getting into it with her in clip 9. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And it was your obligation to follow that policy in this report, was it not? | |
| It was also my obligation to write a confidential report for the Attorney General explaining completely my decision. | ||
| But what you did write was deeply prejudicial to the interests of the President. | ||
| You say it wasn't political, and yet you must have understood. | ||
| You must have understood the impact of your words. | ||
| You must have understood the impact of your decision to go beyond the specifics of a particular document, to go to the very general, to your own personal, prejudicial, subjective opinion of the president, one you knew would be amplified by his political opponent, one you knew that would influence a political campaign. | ||
| You had to understand that. | ||
| And you did it anyway. | ||
| And you did it anyway. And let me just go... | ||
| Let me just go to some of the differences here between the President's conduct and Mr. | ||
| Trump's. In the superseding indictment, on page 3, It says that Mr. | ||
| Trump suggested that his attorney falsely represent to the FBI and grand jury that he did not have documents called for by the grand jury's subpoena. | ||
| You didn't find anything like that with respect to Mr. | ||
| Biden, did you? Congressman, I do not have the Trump indictment in front of me, but I need to address something that you said in your prior question. | ||
| What you were suggesting is that I needed to provide A different version of my report that would be fit for public release. | ||
| That is nowhere in the rules. | ||
| I was to prepare a confidential report that was comprehensive and thorough. | ||
| What is in the rules, Mr. | ||
| Herr, what is in the rules is you don't gratuitously do things to prejudice the subject of an investigation when you're declining to prosecute. | ||
| You don't gratuitously add language that you know will be useful in a political campaign. | ||
| You were not born yesterday. | ||
| You understood exactly what you were doing. | ||
| It was a choice. | ||
| You certainly didn't have to include that language. | ||
| You could have said vis-a-vis the documents that were found at the university. | ||
| The president did not recall. | ||
| There is nothing more common. | ||
| You know this. I know this. | ||
| There is nothing more common with a witness of any age When asked about events that are years old to say, I do not recall. | ||
| Indeed, they're instructed by their attorney to do that if they have any question about it. | ||
| You understood that. | ||
| You made a choice. | ||
| That was a political choice. | ||
| It was the wrong choice. | ||
| Mr. Chairman, I yield back. | ||
| Now, keep in mind what he's talking about there. | ||
| He's saying prejudice in his findings. | ||
| But ladies and gentlemen, what also came out in the hearing today was that the Biden White | ||
| House and Department of Justice and his personal attorneys made multiple requests for redactions | ||
| and edits to her final report. | ||
| They indeed tried to engage in the prejudice, not Robert Herr. | ||
| So again, the White House, the Department of Justice and Biden's personal attorneys | ||
| all demanded that her remove the contents of his finding about Biden not remembering. | ||
| They wanted all of that redacted and removed before the public release. | ||
| So how is that not prejudice? | ||
| How else was her supposed to explain to the general public Yeah, Biden is guilty of all these crimes, but we're not going to suggest charges. | ||
| How else was he going to justify not doing that without pointing out that the reason we're not is because he doesn't remember anything? | ||
| So, but imagine if that would have been the document that come out. | ||
| So, but there's your prejudice. Not from her. | ||
| We got more clips coming up. | ||
| I'm going to explain why it's not all negative as well on the other side of this break. | ||
| Alright, let's get into some of these final clips from today's hearing, and then I'll give you kind of a wrap-up commentary here. | ||
| Let's go to another Democrat here that really embarrassed herself, but that's something that she does frequently. | ||
| It comes easy for Representative Jaya Paul. | ||
| She didn't like the way the questioning and answers were going in her time, so she was trying to talk over her Because it didn't go so well here in Clip 10. | ||
| All charges are warranted in this matter. | ||
| Correct. So this lengthy, expensive, and independent investigation resulted in a complete exoneration of President Joe Biden. | ||
| For every document you discussed in your report, you found insufficient evidence that the President violated any laws about possession or retention of classified materials. | ||
| The primary law that you analyzed for potential prosecution was part of the Espionage Act, 18 U.S.C. 793-E, which criminalizes willful retention or disclosure of national defense information. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Is that correct? Congressman, that is one statute that we analyzed. | |
| I need to go back and make sure that I take note of a word that you used, exoneration. | ||
| Mr. Herr, I'm going to continue with my questions. | ||
| I'm going to continue with my questions. | ||
| I know that the term... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I know that the term... | |
| You exonerated that. | ||
| I know that the term willful retention has a... | ||
| Mr. Herr, it's my time. | ||
| Thank you. I know that the term willful retention has a particular legal meaning, and I want to make sure that that meaning is absolutely clear to the American people before we go any further. | ||
| As you wrote in your report, to prove as a matter of law that the president, quote, willfully retained any documents, you would need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt two elements. | ||
| First, that the president knowingly retained or disclosed national defense. | ||
| So there's actually a lot to take away there. | ||
| Now, the key is there beyond a reasonable doubt. | ||
| And that's what Herr is saying. | ||
| He's saying Biden, essentially, they can argue, oh, he cooperated, he shared everything, he sat down. | ||
| Well, okay, to a certain extent. | ||
| But when he says he can't remember anything, he doesn't know dates, he doesn't know times, he doesn't know who, he doesn't know where, he doesn't know when, he doesn't know why. | ||
| Well, then that leaves the path of reasonable doubt, burden of proof being on the state. | ||
| So he says, look, because Biden has no memory, I can't suggest charges. | ||
| So there's your reasonable doubt. | ||
| And this is used to protect innocent people. | ||
| It's used to put the burden of proof on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt, to make sure innocent people don't get charged and don't get incarcerated. | ||
| But see, notice how really Jayapal just shows how stupid she is. | ||
| And when her tries to correct her, there was no exoneration here. | ||
| And... When you claim that I've found no violations of law, that is inaccurate. | ||
| So as soon as her tries to correct the record where Jayapal says you found no potential criminal acts and you exonerated Biden, he tries to explain, no, that's not what happened, and then she just talks over him to make sure that doesn't go down on record. | ||
| So she proves she knows nothing about the document. | ||
| That Herr submitted. | ||
| And she doesn't even understand basic law and legal terminology and practice. | ||
| But she's already well known as one of the dumbest members of Congress. | ||
| She just proves it yet again right there. | ||
| So, a final comment here from Robert Herr talking about did Joe Biden break the law or not, clip four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My team and I conducted a thorough independent investigation. | |
| We identified evidence that the president willfully retained classified materials after the end of his vice presidency when he was a private citizen. | ||
| This evidence included an audio recorded conversation during which Mr. | ||
| Biden told his ghostwriter that he had, quote, just found all the classified stuff downstairs, end quote. | ||
| When Mr. Biden said this, he was a private citizen speaking to his ghostwriter in his private rental home in Virginia. | ||
| Now, Again, that goes against everything Jayapal just said. | ||
| And he goes on and basically just reaffirms everything that he put in his special counsel report that Joe Biden broke three laws indeed. | ||
| The taking of classified materials illegally, the retention of classified materials illegally, and then the sharing of classified materials illegally. | ||
| All of that was confirmed. | ||
| He simply said he would not recommend charges because what you basically have is an incompetent or uncooperative witness or defendant being Joe Biden. | ||
| And there might even be some underlying what is typical for Republicans in that they don't want to be seen as people that weaponize The system of justice or the government against their political opposition. | ||
| They know how dangerous it is. | ||
| And so even though you have the president of the United States of America committing these crimes, they still don't want to go after them because they know how dangerous it is to weaponize the government against your political opposition, even though that's not even what I would classify this as. | ||
| It would just be justice. They know that's how it would be viewed. | ||
| and so they don't want to do it. | ||
| Now I understand watching this and being extremely upset and viewing this all as a net negative. | ||
| I don't necessarily view it that way, and I'll explain why. | ||
| And I might even open up the mic for some of my crew, because we have debates. | ||
| They're informed on this stuff during the breaks. | ||
| I'll ask them if they want to comment on air. | ||
| But I hope there's a lesson learned here. | ||
| Not just that the Democrats will weaponize government illegitimately against their opposition. | ||
| But that Republicans won't at any cost because they know how dangerous it is. | ||
| But if you're Robert Herr, you've done the Democrats a favor. | ||
| Haven't you? You've protected Joe Biden. | ||
| You've given the Democrats the narrative they want in defense of Joe Biden in the 2024 election. | ||
| And yet, they still attack you. | ||
| They still lie about you. | ||
| They still attack you while you're on the stand. | ||
| They still attack you when Joe Biden makes statements to the press. | ||
| They still attack you in the media. | ||
| So here's Robert Herr up here protecting Joe Biden, doing the Democrats the biggest favor they possibly could ahead of the 2024 election, protecting Joe Biden, and yet they still come after him with the long knives. | ||
| Hope he remembers that. Hope future special counsels remember that. | ||
| And I hope that they realize that their moral opposition to what might be viewed as weaponization of government or using government to go after political opposition in a presidential election year. | ||
| I hope that they realize that that means nothing to the Democrats. | ||
| Nothing. There is no winning favor with these people. | ||
| There is no you do them a favor and they lay off. | ||
| The Democrat Party is completely, entirely corrupted to its core. | ||
| From the tips of its toes to the tips of the hair on their heads. | ||
| They have no decency. | ||
| They are wholly a corrupted entity. | ||
| They are disgusting. | ||
| They have no moral consciousness. | ||
| They have no political consciousness. | ||
| And this gets proven yet again. | ||
| And it will always be that way with these people. | ||
| Now, here's why I say I don't view this as a negative. | ||
| If you look at this on a sliding scale, did anything really move back from today? | ||
| No. You knew Biden was going to be protected from these charges. | ||
| You knew the Democrats were going to use this as an opportunity to attack Trump and make it about Trump. | ||
| Nothing has changed there. | ||
| So on a sliding scale, if anything, this is a neutral as far as that's concerned. | ||
| But also, removing Joe Biden is basically doing the Democrats a favor. | ||
| So the fact that this doesn't really affect Joe Biden politically at this stage, probably a good thing. | ||
| He's going to be forced to campaign, and then the Democrats are going to either be forced to remove him at the final minute, which will cause chaos, or forced to run with him in 2024, which is going to be a disaster. | ||
| So I don't really view this as a net negative. | ||
| Plus, I mean, yeah, if you have any hope for there being justice in this country, then okay, yeah, this is obviously a negative. | ||
| But we already knew that. We already knew there's a two-tiered system of justice. | ||
| We already knew that there is no justice where this is concerned. | ||
| But I also think the American people are noticing this, and I think the American people are taking note that there clearly is... | ||
| A two-tier justice system, and there clearly are individuals that are above the law, Joe Biden being one of them. | ||
| And they see how crazed Democrats are to make this about Trump and ignore the facts of the case. | ||
| So as far as that's concerned, I think that it's probably a positive. | ||
| But yeah, it's hard to say any of this is positive when you have... | ||
| No justice, seemingly. | ||
| People above the law. | ||
| And a completely deranged Democrat Party that can't get over their Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
| Alright, this coverage... | ||
| Of today's hearing with Special Counsel Robert Herr is brought to you by Brain Force Plus. | ||
| Brain Force Plus exclusively available at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| I take Brain Force Plus before I go on air every day for total mental focus and energy. | ||
| It's 25% off right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| The best nootropic on the market. | ||
| Brain Force Plus. InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now remember, not only are Democrats the only political party that's allowed to break the law and get away with it, They're also allowed to deny election results and question election results. | ||
|
unidentified
|
By electors not lawfully certified. | |
| Is the objection in writing and signed not only by the member of the House of Representatives but also by a senator? | ||
| It is in writing, Mr. President. | ||
| Is it signed by a senator? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not as of yet, Mr. President. | |
| In that case, the objection cannot be entertained. | ||
| Mr. President, I object to the certificate from the state of Georgia on the grounds that the electoral votes were not... | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's no debate. There's no debate. I object to the certificate from the state of North Carolina based on violations... | |
| There is no debate. There is no debate in the joint session. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I object because people are horrified. | |
| Section 18, Title III of the United States Code prohibits debate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I object. I've objected to the counting of the electoral votes of the state of Ohio. | |
| I object to the certificate from the state of Alabama. | ||
| The electors were not lawfully certified. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I object to the 15 votes from the state of North Carolina because of the massive voter suppression in the closing of voting polling booths. | |
| There is no debate. There is no debate. | ||
| There is no debate. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And the massive voter suppression that occurs to African Americans. | |
| The gentleman was suspended. | ||
| I have an objection to the electoral votes. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it is not signed by a member of the Senate. | |
| I do not wish to debate. | ||
| I wish to ask, is there one United States Senator who will join me in this letter of objection? | ||
| There is no debate. The objection is signed by a member of the House, but not yet by a member of the Senate. | ||
| It is over. Now imagine the irony here. | ||
| That's Democrats dating back to, well, every presidential election that the Democrats have lost in this millennia. | ||
| They have gone in front of the vice president on January 6th. | ||
| One of the days was January 5th, but we'll call it January 5th. | ||
| January 6th. Imagine the irony. | ||
| Every... Presidential election that the Democrats have lost this millennia, they have argued in front of the vice president on January 6th to reject the electors. | ||
| Every single one. | ||
| Now, how many Americans know that? | ||
| Perhaps more every day. | ||
| That's why we're here on air. | ||
| Playing those clips and covering this news. | ||
| And it's even more ironic that it's Joe Biden up there with the gavel on January 6, 2017, rejecting the Democrats, rejecting the results of the 2016 election. | ||
| Joe Biden! How about that? | ||
| A beautiful masterpiece. | ||
| But see, the Democrats don't want you to know that the precedent was set with Bill Clinton With Judge Amy Berman Jackson keeping records that would have been argued as confidential, but since he was the chief executive, the president of the United States, he's allowed to do it. That was the precedent set with Bill Clinton. | ||
| So Donald Trump not only protected by the Presidential Records Act, but also by previous legal precedent. | ||
| Joe Biden was not the president when he had the classified documents illegally. | ||
| Hillary Clinton was not The president, when she had the classified documents illegally. | ||
| Notice how nobody talks about Barack Obama with all the classified documents he's hoarding in his library in Chicago. | ||
| Why? Because he was the president. | ||
| Nobody talks about that. | ||
| And they want you to act like Republicans in 2021 are the only group of politicians to ever fight back | ||
| or reject the results of a presidential election when the Democrats have done it | ||
| with every single presidential election they have lost this millennium. | ||
| Every single one. | ||
| So this information is making its way out. | ||
| It might be a trickle. | ||
| Eventually it might turn into a tsunami. | ||
| But it all leads me to the same conclusion, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| No matter who the Democrats end up putting forward in 2024, if they beat Donald Trump, no one's going to believe it. | ||
| Nobody's going to believe it. | ||
| Because there is no public support. | ||
| You can't find anybody that supports Joe Biden right now. | ||
| How did he get 81 million votes? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want him found. Not tomorrow, not after breakfast. | |
| Now! Yes, sir! | ||
| Well... Well, what? | ||
| Man up and vanished like a fart in the wind. | ||
| Nothing left but... | ||
| ...damn rocks on the windowsill. | ||
| And that cupcake on the wall. | ||
| What say there, Fuzzy Bridges? | ||
| This is conspiracy. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| One big damn conspiracy! | ||
| And everyone's in on it! | ||
| And for both groups we can make the world stop Unveiling the truth behind the globalist curtain | ||
| Welcome to the war room. | ||
| Into hour number two. | ||
| Got a couple guests coming up in the third hour today. | ||
| But I want to get back to some of these news headlines before we go back to the video clips. | ||
| Let's talk about what's going on at the RNC. Here's some of your headlines today. | ||
| Bloodbath at the RNC. Trump team slashes staff at the Republican National Committee. | ||
| Now this is political left-wing leaning, so... | ||
| I don't know if this is them just running the panic button in their Trump derangement syndrome or if Laura Trump is really running the show, that's what it would appear. | ||
| Or Donald Trump, rather. | ||
| Donald Trump's newly installed leadership team at the Republican National Committee on Monday began the process of pushing out dozens of officials. | ||
| According to two people close to the Trump campaign and the RNC, I would say good. | ||
| All told, the expectation is that more than 60 RNC staffers who work across the political communications and data departments will all be let go. | ||
| They're also already raising more money just in the short time that Whatley and Laura Trump have taken over. | ||
| Washington Post. | ||
| RNC fires dozens of employees after Trump-backed leadership takes over. | ||
| NPR. Remaking the RNC, Trump's hand-selected leaders overhaul the organization. | ||
| And then even the Democrats this morning, the Democrats released a statement on this. | ||
| What? Because the Democrats run the RNC! Until now. | ||
| Democrat National Committee statement on the RNC's desperate MAGA mass firings. | ||
| Now, again, why would the Democrats be making public statements on the Republicans' inner workings and businesses? | ||
| Have you ever seen anything like this before? | ||
| No. So to answer the question of why, because the Democrats have been running the RNC. The Democrats have had influence on the RNC under Ronna Romney McDaniel's leadership. | ||
| Why? Because the anti-establishment populism behind Donald Trump is antithetical to the Uniparty and the Republican establishment with individuals like Mitt Romney and Ronna Romney McDaniel. | ||
| So they had things, they had interests in common. | ||
| The Democrats and the corrupt Republican establishment, they didn't like Trump. | ||
| So the Democrats were running the RNC under Ronna Romney McDaniel's leadership. | ||
| Why do you think she was spending all that money on worthless endeavors and butt injections and lip injections and flowers and limos and massages and dinners and everything that does nothing for the Republicans politically? | ||
| Because the Democrats were telling her, just sabotage the spending right now and spend money on anti-Trump candidates. | ||
| And Ronna Romney McDaniel did it. | ||
| Didn't she? Notice how the Democrats weren't attacking Ronna Romney McDaniel for all of her wasteful spending. | ||
| Why? Because she was doing it for them. | ||
| Any other time you'd see Republicans engaging in wasteful spending like that, the Democrats and their friends in the press would be all over it. | ||
| But they ignored it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because Ronna Romney McDaniel was doing their bidding. | |
| And they didn't want to attack their own operative, did they? | ||
| So the DNC is releasing statements on the RNC being run by Trump because it's no longer run by the Democrats. | ||
| DNC Rapid Response Director Alex Floyd releases the following statement in response to the RNC firing nearly half of their staff as part of a chaotic MAGA purge. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's the chaotic MAGA purge. | |
| These people... | ||
| Firing nearly one third of your staff in a frantic mass ideological purge less than eight months before a presidential election is typically not a good sign for a political party. | ||
| But then again, neither is posting historically weak fundraising numbers or repeatedly losing election after election. | ||
| Best of luck to donors who already wrote the RNC a check this quarter. | ||
| If you hurry, you might still be able to cancel it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So yeah! The Democrats are pissed because they no longer run the RNC. Oh, you love it. | |
| You love to see it. | ||
| So again, they had no problem with Ronna Romney McDaniel wasting money. | ||
| They didn't care if you were cutting checks to the Republican Party so Ronna Romney could suck the fat out of her arms and inject it into her buttocks. | ||
| But now they're telling you don't spend money on the Republicans. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It might actually be going towards winning elections. | |
| Please cancel the check. | ||
| It's beautiful. Now again, I'm not, this is no endorsement of Watley, but I think it's clear what's going on. | ||
| Trump is trying to at least keep some establishment Republicans close to the chest here and running things because maybe it makes him feel good or him feel good. | ||
| But Laura Trump is in there really acting as Trump's surrogate to really run the RNC and run oversight. | ||
| And they're already raising more money. | ||
| But other than that, we'll have to wait and see as far as what... | ||
| Political results or results might come as far as fundraising and other issues are concerned. | ||
| But my guess is it's going to be a positive. | ||
| And you can argue that the RNC is defunct and there's fair arguments there. | ||
| But, I mean, you can use an electric, you know, you can use power tools to screw things in or to build things at your home. | ||
| But, you know, sometimes a screwdriver still works. | ||
| Sometimes you still need a screwdriver. | ||
| So, I mean, that's kind of what this is. | ||
| It's like, well, we still might need a screwdriver, so let's keep the RNC alive. | ||
| Let's use the screwdriver when we need it, and let's find ways to raise money and spend it effectively. | ||
| If the RNC was completely defunct and worthless, then the Democrats wouldn't be so pissed that they no longer run it. | ||
| See? But that's amazing that they basically admit that they ran the whole thing with their releasing of that statement today. | ||
| So, that's fun, as if we didn't know that was going on. | ||
| Then you have the TikTok ban. | ||
| Going to be argued tomorrow. | ||
| The vote is going to take place tomorrow morning. | ||
| Here's Thomas Massey's statement on this leading up to this. | ||
| Next week, the House will vote to give Biden the power to decide which apps you can run on your phone. | ||
| That's the key. Based on whether he deems them to be owned by a foreign adversary. | ||
| I've never used TikTok, but I'm not voting to give the president new powers to ban it and other apps. | ||
| Let me cover some of these other headlines and then circle back to that. | ||
| We'll do the old sake circle back. | ||
| House moves ahead with TikTok ban, Bill, despite opposition from Trump. | ||
| Trump's newfound opposition to a TikTok ban isn't swaying Republicans. | ||
| House to hold TikTok briefing with Intel officials ahead of vote on potential ban. | ||
| Oh, the Intel. The Intel officials are going to get involved. | ||
| House vote set for Wednesday morning. | ||
| Now, getting back to Massey's statement. | ||
| The key here is the House will vote to give Biden the power to decide, the president the power to decide, which apps you can run on your phone based on whether he deems them to be owned by a foreign adversary. | ||
| So let's first go with the beginning there. | ||
| TikTok, in this case, is the straw man. | ||
| TikTok, in this case, is the red herring. | ||
| Now, you have to understand that there's a little bit of a process to be weighed here. | ||
| Because there's no doubt banning TikTok is going to be bad for whoever it gets blamed on. | ||
| It's going to have a net negative political result at the voting booth whoever gets placed with the blame. | ||
| But part of this is gearing up the narrative to blame Republicans for banning TikTok so that the youth vote doesn't blame Biden for it even though it ultimately falls on Biden's desk. | ||
| So that's going to be kind of the political gamesmanship And narrative wars that get fought here. | ||
| And Republicans are already setting themselves up for a massive failure on that. | ||
| But that's just a red herring. | ||
| What this is really about is giving the president the power to decide which apps you can have on your phone, as stated by Thomas Massey. | ||
| So TikTok and blaming it on China is just... | ||
| The entry point. It's just the straw man. | ||
| What they really want to do is ban X and what they really want to do is have the power that the app stores with Apple or Android currently have to just remove apps or ban apps. | ||
| The White House More specifically, you might say the Democrats, but the Republicans are doing it too, so they're going to get the blame for this. | ||
| So our politicians, our government, wants the power to decide what you can and can't have on your phone. | ||
| Now, there were issues raised and votes had that never got through with antitrust issues to say... | ||
| Well, can Apple or Android just decide what goes on your phone and what can't? | ||
| And ultimately, the argument that the Republicans landed on, and many Democrats as well, was that, well, it's free speech for the private companies to say, we don't want so-and-so app on our app store. | ||
| The example—I don't know if there really is any other examples— I mean, definitely InfoWars and then maybe Gab. | ||
| I think they banned the Gab app too. | ||
| I'd have to double check that. | ||
| But I know they banned the InfoWars app. | ||
| In 2018, and again, the left argued it was free speech and the right kind of goes along for the ride. | ||
| And philosophically, you may even agree. | ||
| But in 2018, when they banned Alex Jones and InfoWars and myself and just pretty much an all-encompassing umbrella ban of anything Alex Jones and anything InfoWars... | ||
| YouTube, Facebook, you name it. | ||
| We made an app. | ||
| I forget what it was called, like InfoWars Max or something. | ||
| Do you guys remember what the app was called? | ||
| But we developed an app, and it was basically all-encompassing. | ||
| You could look at our news stories at InfoWars.com on them. | ||
| You could watch all of our streams from, at the time, InfoWars.com slash show. | ||
| So you could watch all of our shows, watch all of our uploads right there on the app, read all the news right there. | ||
| An all-encompassing great app. | ||
| We developed it, spent a lot of money on it, and we were in the app store for maybe a couple months. | ||
| So in response to us getting banned on the other social media platforms, we just launched our own. | ||
| And then they banned the app. | ||
| Yeah, they did ban Gab too. | ||
| So yeah, that's another example. | ||
| So that's what the original argument was about, was is it considered free speech or do private companies have the right to ban individuals or entities, whoever they want, for whatever reason they want? | ||
| And it was ultimately decided that yes. | ||
| And Congress didn't want to get involved. | ||
| Now, the Democrats at that time didn't want to get involved for obvious reasons, because they were censoring their political opposition. | ||
| All these tech companies were run by leftist Democrats, and they were just censoring the opposition to the Democrat Party and censoring the most influential voices that were pro-Trump or exposing corruption in the government, whatever you want to call it, like Alex Jones. | ||
| So at the time, it was really the Democrats that were making these moves. | ||
| In the corporate world and in the government. | ||
| So, of course, the Democrats said, hey, this is an antitrust. | ||
| This is free speech, censoring you wherever we want. | ||
| And the Republicans philosophically would say, well, we're for smaller government. | ||
| These are private entities. So, you know, what we'll just have to say that it is what it is. | ||
| But that just showed that at that time, InfoWars, you're not allowed to have an app. | ||
| Gab, you're not allowed to have an app. | ||
| And that sent the message that, yes, these private companies, or specifically Apple and Android, will be the arbiters of what gets to be platformed and what doesn't. | ||
| Now, since other apps have come along, And exist without censorship now. | ||
| And you might argue that they're too big to censor. | ||
| Maybe Rumble is the lesser of these two examples. | ||
| But obviously X being the biggest of these two examples. | ||
| Well now all of a sudden the Democrats want to give Biden the power to ban apps. | ||
| Where they previously supported that action. | ||
| Why? Because previously they used the action to censor information publicly. | ||
| That was in opposition to them. | ||
| So this isn't about TikTok. | ||
| The Democrats want the power to remove X. That's what this is really about. | ||
| And I believe Elon Musk is making pragmatic decisions whether we like it or not. | ||
| And that's why X is not truly, purely a free speech platform. | ||
| It's about 90-95% free speech. | ||
| I would say probably 90-95 is a fair place to put it as far as free speech is concerned. | ||
| So Musk knows that, okay, you know, I want to have the Everything app. | ||
| I want it to be for cell phone use. | ||
| You can call people, video sharing use, video conferencing use, not to mention just the news feed. | ||
| I want it to be for payment processing, digital currency exchanges, direct messaging. | ||
| He wants it to be the Everything app. | ||
| So if that gets banned off of Apple and Android, then that's done. | ||
| But that's what this TikTok ban is really about. | ||
| And why all of a sudden Republicans are going along with it is because, well, it's anti-China. | ||
| And they want to be strong against China. | ||
| They want to remain strong against China. | ||
| They want to remain strong, at least appear to remain strong, against the ideals of communism. | ||
| But it's a lot easier to do that when it's over there in China. | ||
| They don't seem to be bothered too much of when it happens here in the United States. | ||
| Nonetheless, that's how they've gotten Republicans to go along with this. | ||
| It's because they've made it about China. | ||
| The Democrats are in it for the same reason as they have been. | ||
| They want to ban any opposition party. | ||
| To them on the internet or on social media platforms. | ||
| So TikTok is just a red herring. | ||
| This is really about X and maybe even to a lesser extent Rumble. | ||
| Because Rumble does have an app. | ||
| Works fine enough. | ||
| And you can access Rumble on your phone on the app. | ||
| You can access Rumble on all these different tools like Roku. | ||
| And there's an app there. | ||
| So that's what this is really about. | ||
| So they might be deceiving some conservatives and Republicans to say, oh, this is about China. | ||
| This is about China intelligence gathering. | ||
| This is about a Chinese-run company getting access to all this information and it's dangerous. | ||
| Do not buy it. | ||
| Now, you can be for TikTok or against TikTok. | ||
| You can say TikTok is a tool for good or a tool for bad. | ||
| Well, it can be used for either. But to blame, to use TikTok as the excuse to give the government the power to remove any app from your phone or decide what apps you can and can't have on your phone, that is a red herring. | ||
| Now, more evidence to that. | ||
| Do you really think That the Chinese communists, or any government entity for that matter, needs TikTok to gather intelligence or data or spy on you? | ||
| Do you really believe that? | ||
| Are you really that naive? | ||
| I would say the odds are 99% if you have an Apple phone that the Chinese communists already have access to you. | ||
| Everybody knows how this game is played. | ||
| Because the corporate tax rate in the United States is so high, companies go to China to produce and manufacture their goods, like Apple. | ||
| This is all done by D.C. policy. | ||
| And then who knows, maybe many of them are even owned by the Chinese communists, like Joe Biden. | ||
| Oh, yeah. And you want to talk about banning entities owned by the Chinese communists? | ||
| Well, how about the guy sitting in the White House right now, Joe Biden? | ||
| His ass is owned by the Chinese communists. | ||
| But let's just digress. | ||
| Apple cooperates with the Chinese Communist Party whenever they're asked. | ||
| Apple does not cooperate with the FBI. Who do you think really runs Apple? | ||
| Do you really think Apple is a U.S. company or do you think the Chinese Communist own Apple? | ||
| So let's be real. | ||
| This isn't about, oh, TikTok is gathering information for the Chinese Communist. | ||
| They're spying on you. | ||
| It's a Chinese Communist Party app. | ||
| The Chinese communists already run Apple and have access to anything on your Apple and likely anything on your Android as well, even though a lot of the Android products are made outside of China, like maybe South Korea or other areas. | ||
| But let's not act like TikTok is the big thing to stop Chinese Communist Party access to gather data and spy on us. | ||
| They fly spy balloons all over the damn country! | ||
| How many Chinese spy balloons have been discovered since Joe Biden has taken office? | ||
| And those are just the ones that make the press. | ||
| Obviously, the most famous one, the one that went coast to coast. | ||
| Chinese spy balloon, coast to coast, gathered all kinds of intelligence, military intelligence, nuclear intelligence. | ||
| That's just what we know of. | ||
| And the Biden administration let it fly across the entire continental United States. | ||
| Do you really think they give a damn about Chinese Communist Party intelligence gathering on TikTok? | ||
| You can't be that naive. | ||
| That's a red herring. | ||
| This is all about giving the government the power to decide what information you have access to, what apps you have access to. | ||
| It's dictatorial powers. | ||
| And it's all about stopping you from getting any opposition research. | ||
| Any opposition intelligence. | ||
| It's all about the furtherance of the Democrat Party agenda for a one-party state. | ||
| And the Republicans are going along with it because they want to stay strong against China and stay strong against communism. | ||
| And they're falling right into the trap. | ||
| We'll be following this story tomorrow when the vote hits the floor. | ||
| I think it will fail. | ||
| I think it will fail. | ||
| But let's make no mistake about it. | ||
| This is not about TikTok. | ||
| This is about letting the U.S. government decide what you get access to on your phone. | ||
| And remember, they made no bones about it. | ||
| They made no bones about it. | ||
| They said it was free speech when these companies were allowed to ban Infowars and Gab, but then they're going to say it's okay for the president to decide what you can ban? | ||
| Interesting. Very interesting indeed. | ||
| So we'll be monitoring that for you tomorrow. | ||
| All right, we're about to take a break here and we're going to get into some other political news. | ||
| Remember, everything we do here is brought to you by you. | ||
| Shopping at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Now, every time we open the phone lines, people call in and talk about how great these products are. | ||
| The same thing happened last night. | ||
| I was streaming on X and Rumble and took a bunch of calls and almost every caller called in to talk about how much they love the products at InfoWordStore.com. | ||
| Like Nitric Boost, 40% off right now. | ||
| The great thing about Nitric Boost, it's not just about blood flow and cardiovascular health, which is obviously great, but it enhances the effectiveness of all the other supplements because it helps with blood flow and vasodilation. | ||
| So you're not just... Getting a supplement in Nitric Boost that's good for your cardiovascular health and your blood flow, that also enhances the effects of all the other supplements as well. | ||
| Nothing but five-star reviews at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 40% off Nitric Boost. | ||
| All right, wild stuff going on in Haiti. | ||
| I'm sure you've heard about it. | ||
| The U.S. has now evacuated its embassy staff. | ||
| Amid the gang violence and the total collapse, gangs attack police stations in Haiti as Caribbean leaders call an emergency meeting on Monday. | ||
| Now, let's recall a joke that has some very real, let's say, undercurrent to it. | ||
| This was Donald Trump at the 2016 Al Smith dinner talking about how Hillary Clinton has a lot of involvement in Haiti, clip 22. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Everyone knows, of course, Hillary's belief that it takes a village, which only makes | |
| sense after all in places like Haiti, where she's taken a number of them. | ||
| That one, I guess, was a little too serious. | ||
| But yeah, look into the Clinton Foundation involvement in Haiti, the billions raised, and then where does the money go? | ||
| And there's all kinds of viral clips from over the years, too, of Haitians asking what the hell happened to all the money and directly naming the Clintons for stealing it. | ||
| And so now it collapses. | ||
| Where did all the money go, Hillary? | ||
| But in a more serious manner, here's Matt Gaetz talking about the collapse of Haiti during a hearing today in clip eight. | ||
| February 8th, the White House question. | ||
| Mr. President, why did you share classified information with your ghostwriter, the President? | ||
| I did not share classified information. | ||
| I think we got the wrong clip here, guys. | ||
| We got the wrong clip. | ||
| Okay. I'll tell you what, I'm not gonna try to find that. | ||
| Well, let's just do that then. | ||
| We'll just go ahead and play Matt Gaetz talking about the Biden hearing and we'll try to find the clip of him talking about Haiti. | ||
| So just go ahead and roll, go ahead and just roll that clip then. | ||
| February 8th, the White House question, Mr. | ||
| President, why did you share classified information with your ghostwriter? | ||
| The President, I did not share classified information. | ||
| I did not share it. | ||
| I guarantee I did not. | ||
| That's not true, is it, Mr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hurd? That is inconsistent with the findings based on the evidence in my report. | |
| Yeah, so it's a lie. It's just what regular people would say, right? | ||
| Yeah, all right. So the next one. | ||
| And all the stuff that was in my home was in filing cabinets that were either locked or able to be locked. | ||
| That wasn't true either, was it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That was inconsistent with the findings. | |
| Another lie, people might say, right? | ||
| Because what you put in your report was among the places Mr. | ||
| Biden's lawyers found classified documents in the garage was a damaged open box. | ||
| So here's what I'm understanding, right? | ||
| As Mr. Armstrong laid out, you find in your report that the elements of a federal criminal violation are met. | ||
| But then you apply this senile cooperator theory that because Joe Biden cooperated and the elevator doesn't go to the top floor, you don't think you get a conviction. | ||
| All right, so we just had a little mix-up here between me and the crew, and they thought I was talking about a Matt Gaetz clip from the hearing, but I was talking about a different Matt Gaetz clip where he's talking about what's going on in Haiti. | ||
| So Matt Gaetz has been busy today, as are myself and the crew. | ||
| Thank goodness for Brain Force Plus and Turbo Force Plus at Infowarsstore.com that we're able to handle all this, and we're going to get those clips for you up here in just a second. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus, exclusively available at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 10 hours of clean energy in one scoop. | ||
| I'm not exaggerating. 10 hours of clean energy in one scoop of TurboForce Plus. | ||
| Exclusively available at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 40% off right now. | ||
| Alright, this is going to fill the rest of this segment. | ||
| Matt Gaetz talking about the collapse of Haiti. | ||
| So what's the difference between Haiti and a failed state? | ||
| It's telling, right? We can't really identify them because the gangs are in charge. | ||
| The government has been thrown out. | ||
| And as a Florida man, I'm deeply concerned about this wave of people that we're about to have, that we are having, coming from Haiti. | ||
| And it will accelerate because I've gone to Opelaka and I've spent time with the folks that are engaged in Operation Vigilant Century. | ||
| And they say the number one push factor that drives these Haitians into Broward County, Palm Beach County, where they don't disperse throughout the country, they stay in Southeast Florida. | ||
| That driving factor is the deterioration of conditions in Haiti. | ||
| So what are we doing to prepare for that wave and to ensure that these people are not paroled into the United States, as the administration has done with people on the southern border, but instead are repatriated back at the dock at Port-au-Prince? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Congressman, we're doing a number of things to ensure that we're keeping track of the situation and we're prepared. | |
| At the moment, we have not yet seen large numbers, what we would characterize as a maritime mass migration. | ||
| Do you anticipate a mass migration though? | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are alert to that possibility. | |
| I think you're right that the driving conditions in Haiti could very well press more people. | ||
| We've recently approved some additional assistance that we can provide to the Coast Guard. | ||
| I think that that has now fully been approved. | ||
| We'll be providing notifications, if we haven't already, to provide additional shipboard assistance. | ||
| And what they say would really support them would be more naval vessels, would be DOD support. | ||
| And because I think you correctly said that there is an anticipated mass migration here, there are specific legal authorities that we can access, that I would implore you to access. | ||
| Specifically, George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13276. | ||
| And in that executive order, there is the ability for any president to designate an anticipated mass migration and then get gray hull naval vessels into the Straits of Florida to deter that migration and then to repatriate those people before they get to Florida. | ||
| Because I think you correctly said that there is an anticipated mass migration here, there are specific legal authorities that we can access, that I would implore you to access. | ||
| Specifically, George W. Bush signed Executive Order 13276. | ||
| And in that executive order, there is the ability for any president to designate an anticipated mass migration and then get gray hull naval vessels into the Straits of Florida to deter that migration and then to repatriate those people before they get to Florida. | ||
| So, General Richardson, is it your best military advice, based on what we just heard from Ms. | ||
| Zimmerman, that we activate the authorities anticipating a mass migration? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I think that we need to be postured appropriately for that, exactly what you're talking about. | |
| And I have put in a request for increased capability to do exactly that. | ||
| And we are ready if a mass migration, if we need to deal with a mass migration. | ||
| We did a full walkthrough of our contingency plan on Gitmo last summer with all of the interagency and all of my components. | ||
| When I talk to the Coast Guard folks, they seem to say that we don't have to go drop these folks off at Gitmo, where they become a burden on the U.S. taxpayer. | ||
| We can interdict at sea and then repatriate directly at Port-au-Prince. | ||
| When you say you're preparing for that, does that specifically mean DOD assets? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So, for what happens on a daily basis that the Coast Guard is doing and the repatriation under Homeland Security authorities back to Cap-Haitien happens on a daily basis? | |
| Yeah, no, I got that. | ||
| But when I go down to Opelika and get eyeball to eyeball with these folks, they say, Congressman, we really could use the DOD assistance, not more money for the Coast Guard, not more meetings, conference calls and committees, but gray-haul vessels in the Straits of Florida Doing the interdictions, doing the repatriations. | ||
| So when you say you're anticipating, I think Ms. | ||
| Zimmerman laid it out correctly. So given the fact that an anticipated maritime mass migration is specifically contemplated pursuant to 46 USC 70051, Can I leave this discussion believing that it will be your best military advice to the administration to utilize DOD assets for this purpose, General Richardson? If I'm requested to do that, I will definitely do that. | ||
| No, I want you to make the request, not be requested. | ||
| That's what I'm trying to ascertain. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. Yes, Congressman. | |
| Yes, you will make that request for DOD assets. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I will talk with District 7 and our Coast Guard on the Atlantic side, Atlantic area, and see if they need additional DOD gray holes. | |
| They have not requested that specifically from SOUTHCOM. But if there's a need for that, I would absolutely request it. | ||
| Thank you for that, because I really think getting ahead of this will ensure that the humanitarian conditions will be far better, that we could perhaps deter some of this, because, I mean, it's tragic conditions. | ||
| When you talk to these folks and they say that these Haitians are pouring gasoline on little babies and doing everything they can to deter interdictions, it sharpens the minds of my fellow Floridians to want to make sure you guys are doing everything possible, and I greatly appreciate the exchange today. | ||
| Rand Paul is concerned with an endorsement from President Donald Trump. | ||
| Rand Paul says, Donald Trump just endorsed the worst deep state candidate this election cycle. | ||
| Mike Rogers is a never-Trumper and a card-carrying member of the spy state that seeks to destroy Trump. | ||
| You have to ask yourself, who gives Trump this awful advice? | ||
| Who's next, John Bolton? | ||
| Who does give Trump this awful advice? | ||
| Here's a clip shared by Rand Paul to prove with the video evidence what he's talking about here in clip 11. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't believe today as I'm sitting here that Donald Trump will be the Republican nominee in 2024. | |
| Don't believe it. I don't think it's helpful for the President of the United States to attack the media. | ||
| It's petty, and it's certainly below the stature of the office of the President of the United States. | ||
| It's beneath the office in and of itself. | ||
| Actions and activities unbecoming of the office of the President of the United States. | ||
| So that's the individual that Trump endorsed. | ||
| Questionable, to say the least. | ||
| Speaking of questionable, Pete Booty Juice's husband, Is seen here in a classroom promoting LGBTQ activity to children and getting them to pledge allegiance to the LGBTQ flag. | ||
| This is Pete Booty Jutes, the Secretary of Transportation of the Biden administration. | ||
| His husband, here he is, speaking of questionable. | ||
| How about this for questionable clip 15? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright. I pledge my heart. | |
| I pledge my heart. | ||
| To the rainbow. To the rainbow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The not-so-typical gay camp. | |
| Of the not-so-typical gay camp. | ||
| One camp. One camp. | ||
| Full of pride. Full of pride. | ||
| Indivisible. Indivisible. | ||
| With affirmation and equal rights for all. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With affirmation and equal rights for all. | |
| Watch your heads. And then he waves the... | ||
| What flag is that, actually? | ||
| I don't know. They got all these different flags now. | ||
| I can't even keep up. Isn't that the trans flag? | ||
| Or what is that one? Or is that the new gay flag? | ||
| Sodomy flag? Pete Booty Juice, husband. | ||
| Oh, I'm sorry. It's bootage edge. | ||
| What is it, guys? Booty edge? | ||
| Butt edge? Butt edge edge. | ||
| Whatever it is. He's all about the booty juice. | ||
| And that's his husband promoting gay pride to a classroom of children, pledging allegiance to the gay flag. | ||
| How often do they have to update that flag, by the way? | ||
| Because if you look closely, that's not the original gay flag that just has the horizontal stripes. | ||
| It has the triangle with the black and the brown, which I think represents what happens when you have sodomy, or I don't know what that is. | ||
| But they have to update it. | ||
| And then they put the circle one in it. | ||
| I think that one was for the pedophiles. | ||
| And then they put the circle on it. So they're constantly having to update it. | ||
| I mean, soon they're going to have to put one in there for like the doggy kink too, I think. | ||
| Yeah, slow motion replay. | ||
| See, or maybe that's just a shadow. | ||
| I can't tell. Maybe it is just a shadow. | ||
| Maybe that is just the original. | ||
| Well, then that would actually make... | ||
| Pete Buttigieg's husband, a bigot, wouldn't it? | ||
| He's not waving the proper updated gay flag. | ||
| Where's your ribbon? | ||
| Joe Biden. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who really runs the White House? | |
| Really makes you wonder when Joe Biden says this. | ||
| I think he was in a classroom full of children, so look out. | ||
| Look, if you hear Joe Biden is coming to school today, you might want to have your kids call in sick, if you know what I mean. | ||
| Oh, Joe Biden's coming to school today, Mommy. | ||
| Oh, well, you're going to be staying home from school, little Johnny. | ||
| But Joe Biden has to ask his handlers if he's allowed to take questions. | ||
| So who's really running the White House when Joe Biden has to ask this in clip 12? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Anyway, am I allowed to take any questions? | |
| Oh, it wasn't a classroom. | ||
| I'm as confused as Joe. | ||
| Hold on, hold on. Restart the clip. | ||
| I've corrected myself. I think he was in Pennsylvania. | ||
| He was in Pennsylvania, Georgia. | ||
| Whatever they put him on for the State of the Union, it's still working for him. | ||
| They might have injected him with straight-up liquid turbo force. | ||
| They might have found a way to inject Joe Biden's veins with turbo force because he's still going since the State of the Union. | ||
| Without me interrupting, speaking in front of about 10 people in New Hampshire, I think, he has to ask if he has permission to ask questions or take questions. | ||
| Am I allowed to take any questions? | ||
| Why is that funny? And then he's waiting for his handlers to give him the green light or the red light on can he ask any questions. | ||
| So who really runs the White House? | ||
| That's what you get at a Biden event, by the way. | ||
| About 15 people showing up in a room. | ||
| Campaigning for Janine Sheehan in New Hampshire. | ||
| Not sure that's an endorsement you want. | ||
| Now, there's been an administration decision on behalf of Joe Biden. | ||
| Whether he knows anything about this or not is debatable. | ||
| So Jake Sullivan lets you, the American people in the press, know we have an urgent announcement dealing with funding for Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clip 13. So today, on behalf of President Biden, I'm announcing an emergency package of security assistance of $300 million worth of weapons and equipment to address some of Ukraine's pressing needs. | |
| This is possible because of unanticipated cost savings in contracts that DOD negotiated to replace equipment we've already sent to Ukraine through previous drawdowns. | ||
| Cost savings. Well, I guess it's not cost savings, is it? | ||
| Because the money's still going to Ukraine. | ||
| So it's not cost savings at all. | ||
| So if there were savings, you're not going to see any of them because they're all going to Ukraine. | ||
| Isn't that fun? Huh? | ||
| You having fun? Meanwhile, you can't even go to a Taco Bell in California because it's too dangerous. | ||
| Local news reporting, clip 16. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now where another business is making changes because of safety concerns. | |
| Taco Bell is closing indoor dining at some Oakland locations. | ||
| The fast food chain told us keeping a safe environment for employees and customers is their top priority. | ||
| Drive-throughs, however, will remain open. | ||
| Now, these closures mark another major fast food chain shutting down its indoor dining room in Oakland. | ||
| Just last year, Raising Cane's near the Oakland Airport closed its dining room. | ||
| And In-N-Out announced it's closing its doors altogether because of the rise in crime. | ||
| Their last day is on March 24th. | ||
| Now, what do we call this? | ||
| We've seen the retail, organized retail theft. | ||
| What do we call this? | ||
| Because we've seen the videos. | ||
| I don't know if I ever play them on the show, but I'm sure you've seen them, where you have these groups, sometimes it's individuals, sometimes it's groups, and they go into fast food restaurants, and they just start getting into fights with the staff, and they start throwing things and breaking things and just behaving in a completely unhinged, deranged manner, you know, for whatever reason, and it's a fast food joint. | ||
| And so I guess because of this criminal activity and this violent activity, they're now saying we have to shut down our inside dining. | ||
| What do you call that? | ||
| Fast food violence or fast food restaurant violence? | ||
| I mean, that's a new thing. So you got the organized retail theft that's out of control, that's shutting things down, and now you have the fast food violence violence. | ||
| That's now shutting indoor dining down. | ||
| You can't even go inside a restaurant in some of these areas, all Democrat run. | ||
| You can't even go inside a restaurant in some of these areas without taking your life into your hands. | ||
| This is a rather tame video that we're showing here. | ||
| This one's rather tame. I don't know why you would want to get into it with that fast food worker at Raising Cane's. | ||
| That man looks like he would pummel your ass, and I think he's about to. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, okay, well... Saw that coming. | |
| You're not very smart. | ||
| But if you're deciding to get in a fight at a fast food restaurant over your chicken fingers, probably not that bright to begin with. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My goodness. My goodness. | |
| So I don't know what we call that one. | ||
| So you've got the organized retail theft that's shutting places down, out of control, all in Democrat areas. | ||
| Because, you know, the Democrat... | ||
| District attorneys and judges let violent criminals back on the streets and they justify this criminal activity and they say you're not allowed to arrest these individuals. | ||
| But now you have the fast food dining violent phenomenon. | ||
| Fast food dining room fight club. | ||
| That's kind of got a nice ring to it. | ||
| Fast food dining room fight club. | ||
| Coming soon to an area near you. | ||
| Meaning the kitchen is going to be closed. | ||
| Try the drive-thru. | ||
| But soon that'll be violent too. | ||
| Alright, we have some shocking video from California. | ||
| A lot of the same areas where you have the organized retail theft and the fast food dining room fight club videos. | ||
| You have Kevin Dahlgren. | ||
| Who has documented from inside what they call a safe injection site. | ||
| And I guess this is where you can go inject heroin or fentanyl or whatever drugs you want to do. | ||
| Normally these would be illegal, but they have safe injection sites. | ||
| And I'm not promoting the war on drugs. | ||
| I'm against the war on drugs. | ||
| If you want to destroy your body with narcotics, as long as you're not hurting anybody else. | ||
| I don't think you should be considered a criminal, but they make these sites, and I think it really just highlights the danger in these drugs and how we're just decaying as a society that we promote this activity by giving you a safe injection site instead of even trying to help you. | ||
| So, I mean, there's all kinds of different angles you could take to this, but let's go inside here to Kevin Dahlgren documenting inside a safe injection site. | ||
| This is kind of a horror scene. Go ahead. | ||
| So you see them here smoking with their bongs. | ||
| And then he goes in, they have bunks and beds. | ||
| Some people completely passed out. | ||
| They write on the walls. | ||
| The whole place just really looks very strange. | ||
| As you see here, people just completely passed out, looking, I mean, they look dead. | ||
| I'm assuming they're alive. | ||
| Hard to tell. As he continues to go through here documenting. | ||
| There's one person with like a stolen e-scooter that he's trying to hack into or take the wires out of so he can use it to smoke. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's interesting. | |
| See here, they have like a little Break room. | ||
| They have little dormitory style rooms. | ||
| Some people, this guy's passed out with his face in his food. | ||
| So, you mean you could argue it's better for them to be in here than on the street? | ||
| I might not disagree with that argument. | ||
| We spend all this money on illegal immigrants, and I'm just curious, is there nothing more you can do for these people that are just completely destroyed? | ||
| I mean, I wouldn't even argue that we should be spending any money on these people, but I mean, what do you do? | ||
| What do you do when your culture and your civilization has collapsed to such an extent? | ||
| And this is not the only facility like this, by the way. | ||
| But what do you do when your culture and your civilization has collapsed to such an extent that you have what is called a safe injection site where drug-addicted individuals go, and when you document this activity, it's like a horror house. | ||
| And it's the drug use. | ||
| It's the sickly-looking nature of it. | ||
| Individuals completely passed out. | ||
| You wonder if they're even alive. | ||
| I mean it looks like it is indeed an insane asylum. | ||
| Is what it looks to be. | ||
| And I guess in a way it is. | ||
| But where is even an attempt to address this issue? | ||
| Where is even an attempt to correct this horrific direction that this culture and civilization is going? | ||
| That's really a shame. | ||
| I guess there's nothing you can do about it. | ||
| I guess you just say, here, here's your safe injection site. | ||
| Please stay off the streets and hope you don't die. | ||
| I mean, I guess that's better than putting them in prison and on the streets. | ||
| I don't know how I could argue against that logic. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| you War. | ||
| War. We are now joined by Dr. | ||
| Joseph Sansone. | ||
| You can find some of the subject material about what we're about to discuss on his substack, josephsansone.substack.com. | ||
| Writ of mandamus filed in Florida. | ||
| Supreme Court seeks to compel Governor DeSantis and Attorney General Ashley Moody to ban the jab. | ||
| It's also being picked up by local news. | ||
| The Miami Independent is covering this story. | ||
| And so we're going to ask Dr. Joseph Sanson why he's decided to file this, the problems | ||
| he's seeing with the COVID-19 injections, and what potential success or odds of success | ||
| he sees in Florida. | ||
| Now I would say that Florida is the best state to go after this. | ||
| You have a governor, attorney general, and surgeon general that are all highly skeptical | ||
| of the jab. | ||
| I'm not sure anywhere else, really any other state, has shown the same level of skepticism. | ||
| So, Dr. Joseph Sansone joins me now. | ||
| Let's just get to the basics here. | ||
| The writ of mandamus. | ||
| Just give me a layman here, the details, what this means and what follows. | ||
| So what this is, mandamus is literally Latin for we command. | ||
| And so what this mandamus is doing, it's commanding Governor DeSantis. | ||
| We're asking the Supreme Court of the state of Florida to command Governor DeSantis to remove these biological technological weapons all for the market in the state of Florida and for the Attorney General to seize the vials and conduct a forensic analysis of their contents. | ||
| These injections violate 18 U.S.C. 175, Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, Florida Statute 790.166. | ||
| These are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| Dr. Francis Boyle, the Harvard-educated law professor, wrote the 1989 Bioweapons and Anti-Terrorism Act. | ||
| He read both laws and he affirmed that they violate both of those laws. | ||
| This document, I got to give a shout out to my friend Karen Kingston. | ||
| She compiled thousands of hours of research that she allowed me to use here, which makes | ||
| the bulk of this document. | ||
| And there's just an extraordinary amount of evidence presented there that these injections | ||
| meet the criteria of weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| I also cite state and federal treason and domestic terrorism laws as well as murder | ||
| And for good measure, I threw in the accessory after the fact law as well. | ||
| And one other law just to throw at you is the cosmetic and prescription drug law in Florida speaks specifically to adulterated drugs. | ||
| So Florida is unique because the state of Florida is calling for these shots to be taken off the market through the Florida Department of Health. | ||
| The Florida Department of Health He has called for these shots to be taken off the market because they're an adulterated product. | ||
| And according to the Surgeon General of the State of Florida, they pose a threat to the actual human genome. | ||
| And to use his words, these are the antichrist of drugs. | ||
| Now, the main day myth, now we've exhausted all other avenues too, Owen. | ||
| First of all, thanks for having me on. | ||
| I love your show. | ||
| But he is... | ||
| In February, we passed the first ban to jab resolution in our local county Republican Party, and up to about 10 counties have passed this resolution. | ||
| County parties in the state of Florida are calling for the governor to ban these injections for the Attorney General to confiscate them and conduct forensic analysis. | ||
| Now, they represent millions of people. | ||
| No response. We sent them evidence in the summer and then again in the fall, certified mail in the fall, no response. | ||
| Finally, I sent them a demand letter in February, no response. | ||
| So finally, we filed this writ of mandamus in the Supreme Court of Florida because what we're asking the court to do is stop the carnage, stop these weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| We're just not going to let this happen anymore. | ||
| We're not going to allow our people to be targeted anymore. | ||
| This must end. | ||
| And now the Governor DeSantis has a simple choice here. | ||
| He can hire his attorneys to fight against this, which means he'd be a total fraud, or he can just pull them off the market like the Florida Department of Health is calling for, and that makes this case go away and makes it moot. | ||
| Well, you didn't pull any punches or jabs, pun intended. | ||
| You didn't pull any punches when it comes to this filing. | ||
| Now, I want to get more specific and let's just go ahead and lay it out. | ||
| Why do you consider the COVID-19 jabs to be a biological weapon or a technological weapon? | ||
| Well, they're a biological agent that's harming people en masse. | ||
| And like I said, I've spoken to arguably one of the world's leading legal experts on it. | ||
| They're nanoparticle weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| And we use those terms, COVID injections, nanoparticle injections, as well as MRA injections. | ||
| These people never had any informed consent. | ||
| Nobody told them that they were getting these nanoparticles injected into them. | ||
| We have no idea what the payload is. | ||
| We don't know what the catalysts are to the payloads that's in these nanoparticles. | ||
| And so we've got some research out there shows as much as 17 million people have died worldwide already. | ||
| I know speaking to doctors, and this is in there, I've spoken with Dr. | ||
| Vila, who we're having an event on the 15th here in the villages. | ||
| She's treating over 2,000 vaccine-injured patients, and over 100 of them are going to be there, and probably more remotely. | ||
| But what she's telling me is... | ||
| Everyone that gets the injection is developing an autoimmune disease. | ||
| They're getting a damaged immune system. | ||
| Now, this was confirmed by Dr. | ||
| Van Marble, as well as the Nobel Prize nominee, who's also treated thousands of vaccine victims. | ||
| My colleague at National American Renaissance Movement, Dr. | ||
| Anna Mahalchia, she's done extraordinary research using dark field microscopy on the self-assembling technology, creating these hydrogel mounds to create these biosynthetic blood clots that you're seeing with these people. | ||
| And so, specifically, people are getting killed. | ||
| They're getting cancers. | ||
| They're getting turbo cancers. They're getting cognitive problems. | ||
| They're getting fatigue, brain fog. | ||
| It's really brain damage, I guess. | ||
| And they're getting autoimmune diseases as well as heart conditions. | ||
| And so... | ||
| Keep in mind, I want you to put this in context, Owen. | ||
| When we have an automobile where the airbags don't open up properly, we take them off the market. | ||
| Now, Governor DeSantis went, and the video is still out there. | ||
| Governor DeSantis went out there and told people that early on in the pandemic, he told people that 90% of the people that were going to the hospital were unvaccinated. | ||
| Did he really believe that at the time, or did somebody lie to him? | ||
| I don't know. But at this point in time, there's enough evidence for him to pull these off the market. | ||
| And he's seen evidence before, but I can tell you right now, this document that's being served to them, this has so much evidence in it that these are weapons of mass destruction, that at this point, I believe he has no choice. | ||
| And look, I don't have anything against Governor DeSantis personally, but I'm not going to look the other way while 17 million Floridians have been poisoned. | ||
| I'm not going to look the other way while people are dying and getting sick. | ||
| And here's what's happening too, Owen. | ||
| You've got this, and that's why we're doing this event on Friday at The Villages, which is a big senior community in Florida. | ||
| Nick Cataruno set that up. | ||
| I didn't set it up. I'm just a speaker. | ||
| But the problem is, is you've got people that are sick right now, and they're being gas-lipped by their doctors. | ||
| They're telling them they've had pre-existing conditions or it's in their head, that kind of thing. | ||
| And I'm not a medical doctor. | ||
| I like to say I'm a psychotherapist as opposed to psychopathic authoritarianism, which means pretty much everything right now. | ||
| But these people have been lied to. | ||
| They've been violated. It's the equivalent of somebody that's been raped and then afterward you're telling them they haven't been raped. | ||
| What do we do with these people? | ||
| They're poisoned. So what needs to happen is we need to stop this immediately, and then we need to get doctors and scientists together to start brainstorming on ways to mitigate the damage that's been done. | ||
| And then we need to go after these people. | ||
| But I'm going to tell you right now, if you're a nurse, you're in a healthcare field, do not obey orders. | ||
| Because if you give these shots right now with the evidence that we just put out there, you're putting yourself in jeopardy. | ||
| Well, and I'm going to get more into the technological weapons with another doctor we're trying to schedule an interview with next week because it appears that there's still things we don't fully understand about this technology and that it might even be used in other products that we're not aware of. | ||
| And so I don't know if you're up to date on that or if you want to comment on that. | ||
| I can speak to that a little bit. | ||
| I know, for instance, and look, I've had type 1 diabetes since 1984, so do not go off your insulin right now. | ||
| I can't go off my insulin. | ||
| I'm being held hostage. But I know that Dr. | ||
| Anna Mahalcha looked at my insulin and she found the hydrogels in there and what looks like a similar self-assembling technology that's in these shots. | ||
| And I inject four times a day to live, so I have no choice. | ||
| Now, I had back in April 1st of last year, April Fool's Day figures, I had congestive heart failure. | ||
| I woke up 3.30 in the morning and I couldn't breathe. | ||
| Long story short, on April 10th, I had triple bypass heart surgery. | ||
| And I don't know if that had something to do with what's in my insulin or not. | ||
| I have no idea. But, yeah, they are putting them in other medications as well. | ||
| And that's why, toward the end of this document, I do actually put in all MRA products. | ||
| So these are, you know, nanoparticle weapons that need to be taken off the market. | ||
| And yeah, you can see we got on the 15th, we got attorneys there, Todd Callender, Warner Mendenhall, Rachel Rodriguez, Dr. | ||
| Mahatje, Dr. Ville, a lot of doctors there. | ||
| I guess I'm probably the only psychotherapist. | ||
| Dr. Anna Mahatje is there and others. | ||
| And all those people on the bottom are some of the premiered victims that will be speaking, but there's going to be a lot of victims there because these people need a voice. | ||
| Yeah. You know, we need to provide a voice to the voiceless because they're just being left aside like nothing happened to them. | ||
| Yeah, the event information is there on the screen. | ||
| The crew added up on the screen if you're in Florida and you want to be a part of this. | ||
| There it is, the 15th of March, 3 to 7. | ||
| We're going to live stream it, too. | ||
| You can also live stream it, yeah. | ||
| And that'll be on Rumble. | ||
| Yeah, it'll be on Rumble and elsewhere, Twitter. | ||
| And so these are like, I mean, this is a no-brainer at this point. | ||
| Just take them off the market. | ||
| Yeah. We have to do this in Florida. | ||
| But see, what it shows me is, you know, you bring up airbags or there's all kinds of recalls on cars or other products and they'll pull them off the market. | ||
| To me, it just shows the stranglehold that the big pharmaceutical industries have on policy, quite frankly. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, here's the deal. | ||
| Every politician is either a coward, corrupt, or out of touch right now. | ||
| Because how many politicians have openly said these are biological weapons? | ||
| Now, I don't know what the- I think John Johnson, I don't know if I've heard any others. | ||
| I mean, DeSantis has been critical. | ||
| It's been critical, but I don't know. | ||
| Did Ron Johnson say they're weapons? | ||
| I didn't know that. That's good, because I'm going to tell you statistically, if you were to do a survey of some kind, 25 to 50 percent of the people are probably going to say these are deliberately designed to harm you, that they're weapons. | ||
| But I haven't heard any politicians saying that. | ||
| And that's concerning. | ||
| Well, let me talk to you about Florida real quick, though, because I have seen DeSantis be critical. | ||
| I believe I've seen Moody be somewhat critical, at least of the policies. | ||
| I don't know if the direct vaccine itself, but the policy. | ||
| And then the Florida Surgeon General, whose name is skipping my head right now. | ||
| I'm going to have the crew pull it up. Dr. Latipo. | ||
| He's been very skeptical, too. | ||
| So I feel like there's at least an opening for you to get their ear. | ||
| I agree. I agree. | ||
| And that's one of the reasons, you know, why we're doing this. | ||
| The Florida Surgeon General, I believe, is trying to save human lives. | ||
| Governor DeSantis needs to pull these off the market. | ||
| He's got the power to do it. | ||
| If they claim that they don't, that's not true. | ||
| They locked innocent people in their homes. | ||
| Violating basic human rights, they can pull a product off the market that's killing people and injuring them. | ||
| And I believe Dr. Ladipo, and I don't know that Ron DeSantis is working against it or not, but it's moving too slow. | ||
| We have to get these off the market now. | ||
| It should have happened immediately when you started seeing people getting sick and dying early on in early 2021. | ||
| So I don't understand what the delay is at this point. | ||
| They have the authority to do it. | ||
| There's no reason that these are still on the market at this point. | ||
| What do you make of Trump supporting the vaccines? | ||
| You know, I saw that comment the other day and I just shook my head. | ||
| I don't know what to say. | ||
| I mean, you know, he's either in on it or an idiot. | ||
| I don't know. Is he really that aloof? | ||
| I don't get it. He needs to do an about face on this immediately. | ||
| What I would do if I were to Trump campaign is I'd say that one of my staffers did that and we fired him because that was dumb. | ||
| And here's the irony. All the Trump supporters, or overwhelmingly most of them, I can tell you right here in Florida especially, know that these are weapons at this point. | ||
| Even people that got the injections, they understand that. | ||
| Yeah, I would agree. The majority of Trump supporters are against the vaccine. | ||
| Yeah. And then, so there's a little PSYOP that's been going on here in Florida, because it's come from the top level down. | ||
| And the PSYOP is the, well, we don't want to be like Democrats. | ||
| We don't want to, you know, mandate things and this and that. | ||
| Okay, what part of biological and technological weapon are people not getting? | ||
| These are designed to harm people. | ||
| They're designed to depopulate. | ||
| Birth rates are going down. | ||
| They're killing the old people. | ||
| They're This is a deliberate assault on American people and you cannot be America first and look the other way while they're killing our people. | ||
| Yeah, and anybody who's done time looking into this knows that there's so much evidence. | ||
| It's really off the charts, unreal. | ||
| I mean, even the basic data that you can pull from the government's own website, the VAERS website, the Vaccine Adverse Reaction website, I mean, even that shows, I mean, it's worse than the vote Viagra for Joe Biden at 3.30 in the morning on election night. | ||
| I mean, it's more ridiculous than that. | ||
| Yeah, again, I don't understand why these are not... | ||
| And here's why this is really important, too, Owen. | ||
| We need to break through in Florida. | ||
| We need to get these weapons prohibited here in Florida. | ||
| Because if we do it here, Texas will fall next. | ||
| And I'm going to tell you right now... | ||
| Well, Florida's definitely the state to go with it. | ||
| I agree. Well, I think Texas is prime, too, because the Attorney General of the state of Texas is doing Pfizer. | ||
| But again, why are they still on the market? | ||
| It just shows the stranglehold that the big pharma community has. | ||
| I mean, it truly is a stranglehold. | ||
| And even all the propaganda with this vaccine, too. | ||
| Well, I gotta tell you, this evidence compiled by Karen Kingston has Dr. | ||
| Mahalchi's evidence in there, a lot of it. | ||
| This is filed with the Supreme Court of Florida now. | ||
| And this is public record. | ||
| And the Supreme Court has great latitude here. | ||
| Probably the proper response when they look at all this evidence would be to wait and give the respondents time to reply. | ||
| Which, you know, so I'll give them a couple months. | ||
| But I gotta tell you, I really would prefer Governor DeSantis to just pull these off the market. | ||
| Well, here's a good juxtaposition. | ||
| It was probably a couple years ago. | ||
| I don't know if they pulled all the Boeing MAX 8 planes off the tarmac, but there's obviously a lot of problems going on as far as the airline industry, specifically apparently with these Boeing planes. | ||
| And there's debates. Is it diversity hires? | ||
| Is it something in the Boeing manufacturing? | ||
| Maybe it's both. But there was huge news about how, oh, we have this problem with the MAX 8, the Boeing MAX, we can't fly in this plane, it could be potentially dangerous. | ||
| Now, nobody, I don't believe there were any plane crashes or anybody dying, but they said, well, this is a threat, we've got to pull them off. | ||
| We have direct data and proof that the COVID-19 vaccine has indeed killed people. | ||
| So why isn't that being pulled off the market? | ||
| Why is nobody talking about this? | ||
| This is as big as the Boeing story. | ||
| Because it's like, and as a psychotherapist, I specialize in clinical hypnosis, so it's kind of like a mass hypnosis thing. | ||
| They're just pretending it didn't happen. | ||
| They're pointing over here. And there's no justification for these being on the market, because here's the thing, too. | ||
| Again, my colleague, Dr. Anna Mahalchi, has done so much research. | ||
| She specializes in injuries for the unvaccinated due to the shedding. | ||
| And look, the shedding stuff was right in the original Pfizer documentation that came out. | ||
| And so... People are getting sick. | ||
| They're not even vaccinated. I'm not telling you to be afraid to go walk around or that type of thing. | ||
| But they baited us like insects here. | ||
| We have to stop this so that they don't come through with the next so-called mRNA treatment and so on. | ||
| And like you said, they're putting it in other drugs. | ||
| It just... We cannot allow this to continue. | ||
| I can tell you right now, Owen, these are coming off the market here. | ||
| One way or the other, we're going to stop this. | ||
| If we get blocked this way, we're going to find another path because we're not going to allow biological warfare against American citizens to continue. | ||
| 17 million Floridians have been poisoned with at least one shot. | ||
| Supposedly 277 million Americans have been poisoned with at least one shot. | ||
| And we're going to wake these people up. | ||
| We're going to give the victims the courage to come forward. | ||
| And if we need to start having these people show up in Tallahassee and sit on the governor's doorstep, that's what we'll do. | ||
| Because these have to come off the market. | ||
| They have to come off this market two years ago. | ||
| Dr. Joseph Sansone is my guest. | ||
| You can find more about this, josephsansone.substack.com. | ||
| You know, I kind of get the feeling this is going to play out a lot like the Twitter files where people were talking about the censorship and everything going on at Twitter, but it was like kind of just a murmur. | ||
| But now here in 2024, like five years later, oh, everybody's talking about the Twitter files. | ||
| And now all these other people are reporting on it. | ||
| Now it's mainstream news, the censorship and everything. | ||
| I have a feeling that we may see a similar plot unfold here with the vaccines. | ||
| And maybe two years from now, it'll be breaking news. | ||
| COVID-19 vaccines kill millions. | ||
| It's like, well, we knew about that years ago. | ||
| But okay, fine. It's breaking news now. | ||
| I want to ask you, though. | ||
| Do you have any allies right now on this issue? | ||
| No, not at this point because when I did this, about 10 people knew about it. | ||
| They were sworn to secrecy or they'd end up in the Everglades. | ||
| But seriously, about 10 people knew about it. | ||
| I didn't want anybody to know it until it was filed because I didn't want any way to try to block it until it was filed. | ||
| I would welcome anyone's support to this. | ||
| You can file an amicus brief. | ||
| Look, if there's a sharp attorney there and there's a legal argument that they can use to support this that's not in here, do it. | ||
| If I miss something medically, go ahead, file an amicus with the Supreme Court. | ||
| There's still a little time to do that. | ||
| But here's the thing. | ||
| This is kind of a litmus test because people out there talking about the dangers of these shots, if they don't support this, there's a problem. | ||
| Now, I'm going to appeal to the humanity. | ||
| Hopefully the humanity of the Supreme Court, or even Governor Ron DeSantis, will respond to this. | ||
| But I'm going to appeal to the humanity of the people in the press. | ||
| You've been lied to. You've been poisoned. | ||
| You've seen the people around you getting sick, too. | ||
| Everybody that's within the sound of my voice knows somebody that died or got sick from these shots or who's sick right now. | ||
| And keep in mind, just giving someone, like I said, I have type 1 diabetes. | ||
| The lifespan on average with someone with type 1 diabetes is 15 years less than everybody else. | ||
| So we don't know 10 years from now how many people are going to die if they've got a compromised immune system like doctors are saying. | ||
| And this is something that needs to be stopped immediately. | ||
| We need to start having doctors inside. | ||
| We need to admit what it is and then start working on ways to mitigate the damage. | ||
| There's people that are sick right now that aren't being helped, and there's other people that don't even know they're sick right now. | ||
| And we just got to do this. | ||
| I don't know what the Supreme Court will do. | ||
| They've got an enormous amount of latitude. | ||
| They'll probably just wait and see how the respondents reply. | ||
| Again, hopefully the governor will just listen to the Florida Department of Health and remove these injections from the market. | ||
| And the Surgeon General. | ||
| Dr. Joseph Sandstone, thank you so much. | ||
| Just final comments where people can follow your worker if they want to see this event coming up on the 15th. | ||
| Sure. Just go to josephsansone.substack.com. | ||
| And I have a post on there about the event, too, and it has the address and everything. | ||
| And it will be live streamed at multiple places. | ||
| And then the flyer lists those places. | ||
| Owen, I want to thank you for having me on. | ||
| And part of the strategy here is get as much attention to this as possible so that Governor DeSantis does the right thing and protects the people of Florida from these weapons of mass destruction. | ||
| Absolutely. Godspeed. | ||
| We're going to be praying for your success. | ||
| And I think you're right. Inevitably, this product is going to have to be pulled from the market. | ||
| Better now than later for obvious reasons. | ||
| Dr. Sansone, thank you so much for your time. | ||
| Brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Don't forget to support us, ladies and gentlemen, so we can get the great guests like Joseph Sansone on and bring light to their stories. | ||
| You know the mainstream media won't touch it. | ||
| They're funded by Big Pharma, not us. | ||
| So we need to put as many eyes and ears on that story as possible. | ||
| So please continue to support us at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| So many great products. Bodies, 40% off the Ultimate Turmeric Supplement. | ||
| TurboForce Plus, 40% off 10 hours clean energy, one scoop. | ||
| Winter Sun Plus, Ultimate Vitamin D Supplement, 40% off. | ||
| Nitric Boost for blood flow and circulation. | ||
| Enhances the effects of all the other supplements. | ||
| It's all at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And it's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
| Alright, we're going to have some breaking news coming up. | ||
| I don't even know what she's about to break. | ||
| She says she couldn't even tell me. | ||
| But Brianna Morello is going to break news on the show coming up in the next segment. | ||
| I've got some other stories we can hit before that happens. | ||
| Representative Jim Jordan has made a statement since that hearing today. | ||
| He just published this about an hour ago. | ||
| The FBI seized 17 notebooks and a stack of note cards from Joe Biden's residence that included handwritten notes containing classified information that touched on sources and methods. | ||
| Wasn't prosecuted. | ||
| Double standard. Elon Musk replies, the double standard is obvious to the public, which naturally reduces faith in the justice system. | ||
| So that's what I'm saying here. | ||
| It's obviously overall a negative that we have so much corruption in our government and so much corruption in the Justice Department. | ||
| That's obvious. That's obviously a bad thing. | ||
| But it's so bad and so obvious that now the average American sees it. | ||
| So, I mean, it either goes, the Democrats just either conquer the country, go full tyrant, full authoritarian, like they would like to. | ||
| I mean, they don't even hide it. | ||
| Or we save the country and the Democrat Party is eradicated from our body politic, peacefully and politically. | ||
| There's only two options. | ||
| But it's hard to even imagine what happens in the coming 238 days as the average American becomes more aware, as it becomes more and more obvious that the double standards in justice, some people are above the law, specifically if your last name is Biden. | ||
| The politicized persecution against Donald Trump, and then ultimately the results of a presidential election where nobody believes Joe Biden could possibly win. | ||
| And we already saw the results after they stole it in 2020. | ||
| What would happen in 2024 when it'll be even more obvious? | ||
| Or maybe the question is, what in the hell are the Democrats and the deep state going to do in between now and then? | ||
| Maybe that's the ultimate question. | ||
| But, okay, you had the hearing for her today. | ||
| Let's not forget, there will soon be hearings into the Hunter Biden investigation as well. | ||
| Those will be coming up very soon. | ||
| And the witnesses, and perhaps even Hunter Biden himself, are going to be forced to testify. | ||
| So, this situation for the Bidens is not going anywhere. | ||
| And as much lying and obfuscation as the Democrats engage in, most Americans, at least the ones that have two brain cells and IQ points to still rub together, in other words, anybody that's not a radical liberal Democrat, can see what's really going on here. | ||
| It doesn't matter if they support Trump or not. | ||
| They see the corruption of the Democrat Party. | ||
| They see the corruption of Joe Biden. | ||
| They see the corruption of the Biden administration and the Justice Department and the FBI and everything else. | ||
| And that is something that cannot be put back in the bag. | ||
| Or here it is, kind of succinctly put by Laura Loomer over the weekend. | ||
| I hate that I live in a country where a crackhead career criminal in Minneapolis who resisted arrest is celebrated, but a young woman who was murdered by an illegal immigrant is ignored. | ||
| Why is Derek Chauvin in jail when Jose Ibarra is being apologized to by the illegitimate occupant in the White House? | ||
| How can anyone be proud to be an American these days? | ||
| It's disgusting what is happening. | ||
| You know, I go through... | ||
| I kind of go through this in my own head constantly now. | ||
| I mean, how could you not? | ||
| Your country is being occupied by corrupt individuals like Joe Biden. | ||
| Your country is being conquered by corrupt individuals and institutions. | ||
| It's undeniable. There's an illegal invasion... | ||
| Happening right now. | ||
| It's the largest invasion in the history of the world going on. | ||
| And seemingly we're powerless to do anything about it. | ||
| Certainly everybody thinks about this. | ||
| Certainly everybody wonders about the future or even our role here in America. | ||
| If we'll have a free country. | ||
| So I'm constantly thinking, you know... | ||
| Is it about being proud to be an American? | ||
| Is it accepting that we're occupied? | ||
| Is it accepting that we're currently conquered? | ||
| Is it trying to figure out the ways to get our country back? | ||
| What do you even consider this time? | ||
| The example of juxtaposing George Floyd and Lakin Riley is just one of many. | ||
| But there is no doubt this is the most corrupt time in America's history. | ||
| And as I've said, the Democrat Party in the United States of America cannot exist for another six years, and they won't. | ||
| Either the Democrat Party, which is really just run by radical leftist communists, which are just masquerading as a front for the UN and for the globalists, And whatever corporations own them, whatever blackmailing entities own them, to just collapse the United States into the corporate world government, the World Economic Forum, the Satanist secret societies... | ||
| But the Democrat Party is right in front of you. | ||
| It's easy to understand. | ||
| It's easy to comprehend. The average American can start noticing that. | ||
| Now, you start talking about the World Economic Forum, you might lose some. | ||
| You start talking about the satanic pedophile cabals, you might lose them. | ||
| But they see the Democrat Party. | ||
| It's operating right in front of them. | ||
| So, but when does it sink in? | ||
| When does it hit? I mean, it's a pretty stark realization to have. | ||
| My country is occupied. | ||
| My country is being corrupted. | ||
| My country is being collapsed. | ||
| My country is being conquered. | ||
| And it's the enemy within. | ||
| It's the Democrat Party. | ||
| And it's the Republican Party too. | ||
| Laura Loomer also broke the news over the weekend that Vivek Ramaswamy was nominated to give the State of the Union rebuttal, but Mitch McConnell squandered it and gave it to Katie Britt instead, who ended up just completely blowing it, who just butchered it. | ||
| You can't even imagine. It was just awful, but it was Mitch McConnell that did it. | ||
| So, oh yeah, Mitch, oh, I'm stepping down, I'm resigning. | ||
| Total lie, total fake, total fraud. | ||
| He's stepping down after the presidential election so that he can sabotage the Republican Party and help the Democrats right up until Election Day. | ||
| He wasn't going to be the leader in the Senate for the next session anyway. | ||
| So he's sticking around long enough to sabotage the Republican Party. | ||
| But thank goodness we got McCarthy out. | ||
| Thank goodness we got Ronald Romney McDaniel out. | ||
| But we got to get McConnell out before November. | ||
| McConnell needs to go... | ||
| As soon as possible. | ||
| And Rand Paul needs to lead the charge. | ||
| And that's just a perfect example of how McConnell is sabotaging the Republican Party and Donald Trump ahead of the presidential election. | ||
| And there's many other ways behind closed doors. | ||
| And there's many other ways like letting Chuck Schumer basically run his office. | ||
| And that's what it is. | ||
| And that's what's going on. | ||
| Now, there is another member of the Republican Party that's committing self-sabotage and sabotaging ahead of the presidential election in November, and that's Ken Buck, who says he's going to be leaving Congress next week, costing Republicans another vote in the House. | ||
| So they self-sabotage by voting Santos out. | ||
| They self-sabotage by Mitch McConnell faking a resignation but tanking Republicans in the Senate ahead of the presidential election. | ||
| And now Buck is going to step down? | ||
| We'll talk about that and breaking news with Brianna Morello on the other side of this break. | ||
| It's the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We are now joined by Brianna Morello who is bringing us an exclusive news story. | ||
| I don't even know what she's about to break here. | ||
| But she told me earlier today she had an exclusive and she wanted to break it. | ||
| Not just on her website, BriannaMorello.com, but right here on the air with us. | ||
| So Brianna joins us now, and I understand you've shared some documents as well with our crew. | ||
| So what can you exclusively report for us right now, Brianna? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hi, Owen. So I figured you'd want to hear this one first. | |
| This letter that I've obtained was sent to the Graves office, who is the person who's persecuting, as you know, all of these J6ers. | ||
| So what's going on here? Well, he is telling Graves... | ||
| You better preserve all your documents. | ||
| We're looking for them. It's all in reference to the journalist Steve Baker from The Blaze, who was just at the beginning of the month prosecuted, arrested for his coverage on January 6th. | ||
| Now, we've just had a couple of minutes to kind of go through this. | ||
| So bear with me. | ||
| Specifically, Chairman Jim Jordan is requesting from Matthew Graves' office all the documents of communications referring and related to the arrest of Steve Baker. | ||
| He's also asking for all of the documents of communications regarding journalists like yourself who were arrested and prosecuted by the DOJ in regards to their attendance at the Capitol rally. | ||
| He's also asking for all of the documents of communications related to the J6 defendants Who were held in pretrial detention prior, obviously, like that says, to their trials. | ||
| He's also again asking for any other communications and documents they have regarding the defendants who are connected with the events that unfolded at the Capitol on January 6th. | ||
| So ultimately what this all is, it's the announcement of the launch of the investigation that we've been calling for for so long now regarding the DOJ and their persecution of J6ers. | ||
| He also calls out Matthew Graves' office for closing in his investigation on just Steve Baker. | ||
| Now, what we mean about this is Steve Baker was there that day reporting inside the Capitol on what was unfolding. | ||
| But there was also other journalists who were next to Steve Baker, but they weren't charged or arrested. | ||
| And so he's calling it all out in this letter. | ||
| So Matthew Graves has until it looks like March 26th at 5 p.m. | ||
| to respond to this with all the documents he's requesting. | ||
| Now, we would just assume that he's going to try to say that this is an ongoing investigation. | ||
| He can't comply with the Judiciary Committee's request. | ||
| But he has to. | ||
| There's no choice in that one. He must comply. | ||
| So it will be interesting because so many other cases like yours have already seen their way through. | ||
| You've been sentenced. And so there's no way that they could hide behind this by saying, hey, we can't give you anything because it's an ongoing investigation. | ||
| The investigation into you, other investigative journalists like Stephen Horne, J.D. Rivera, those have all concluded. | ||
| So he has to hand these things over. | ||
| And so we'll see how Matthew Graves' office responds. | ||
| But it's a complete bombshell. | ||
| We've been calling for this for years now. | ||
| And so we're so happy that Jim Jordan and his team sent this letter to Matthew Graves' office because this is important. | ||
| Well, this is incredible. | ||
| And to highlight what you mentioned about video journalists, photo journalists that were in there, there was also... | ||
| Other video journalists that were in there that have been charged and gone through their sentencing, like Sam Montoya, he was one of the first. | ||
| There have been other journalists that haven't been charged that now might even be more concerned that they could be charged. | ||
| That is unless, of course, you're a proper member of the establishment corrupt media. | ||
| It seems that they're above any of these charges. | ||
| So in other words, if you're a member of CNN, MSNBC, ABC, you're okay. | ||
| But if you're with a conservative or independent media outlet, then you're in trouble. | ||
| Now this takes me back. This was when they first charged me and put that story back Because, Brianna, this is when they first charged me. | ||
| There was a judge, a magistrate judge in D.C. that was questioning what was going on. | ||
| Judge wants Justice Department to detail decision on charging Infowars correspondent accused in January 6th riot. | ||
| That's Magistrate Judge Faruqi. | ||
| And he's properly highlighting what became law during the Obama administration that there's different protocols you have to go through when you charge a journalist. | ||
| Now, what the Department of Justice has been doing under the Biden administration is just deciding, well, we're just going to determine who's a journalist and who's not. | ||
| Now, that's why the whole Obama law is probably illegitimate to begin with. | ||
| But nonetheless... | ||
| Everybody should have a First Amendment, whether you're a journalist or not. | ||
| But to argue I'm not a journalist is obviously illegitimate. | ||
| And it just shows, oh, well, we're just going to determine who's a journalist and who's not. | ||
| So the Department of Justice said, well, we did not follow the law when we prosecuted Owen Schroyer. | ||
| We're not going to comply with the law and we're going to ignore this magistrate judge who's questioning it. | ||
| And they obviously went forward with all the charges. | ||
| And then even after that, Judge Kelly was not interested or compelled in hearing these arguments either. | ||
| So now this comes back up to me... | ||
| Because it's an issue that most have kind of missed on this, that the DOJ is ignoring the law written by the Obama administration that says there's all these different rules to prosecute a journalist, and they're just saying, oh, well, we just don't count them as journalists. | ||
| So they're now picking and choosing who's a journalist and who's not, and it's obviously all based on political affiliation. | ||
| Now look... I understand this more than most, just how powerful Matthew Graves is. | ||
| I mean, I'm not going to sit here and lick the boots of Matthew Graves, but I mean, I'll just tell you. | ||
| Who knows? He might call up and have somebody come arrest me just because this news is being broken on my show. | ||
| I mean, that's how serious this is. | ||
| So, obviously, Jim Jordan and the Judiciary Committee is privy to information knowing. | ||
| I mean, honestly, Matthew Graves has more to do with these political persecutions than Merrick Garland does. | ||
| He seems to be the one that's spearheading most of this stuff. | ||
| I mean, is there anything you can enlighten us as far as why he chose to go for Matthew Graves instead of Merrick Garland specifically? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I actually don't know. | |
| I'm sure this is just the beginning. | ||
| I'm sure there will be some type of hearing that follows after this I mean, this looks like the beginning stages. | ||
| So I agree with you. | ||
| I think Garland's got to show his face in this as well. | ||
| We'll see. I'm pretty sure he'll go after him next, though. | ||
| I think that this is just kind of like laying out the groundwork for right now. | ||
| Because Graves' office has been so egregious. | ||
| I mean, it doesn't... | ||
| It's not so... As we discussed earlier about Steve Baker, it's not just the four misdemeanor charges they're trying to go after him with. | ||
| They're trying to go after him with... | ||
| A lot more. And I have to spare the details as of right now, but this isn't just four misdemeanor charges that they're trying to go after Steve Baker with. | ||
| There's a lot more that I'm hearing internally at the DOJ right now that's going on. | ||
| So like you mentioned, I mean, Graves might come after you too for just talking about this. | ||
| Yeah, I wouldn't put it past them. | ||
| They don't like journalists. They don't like people who are doing their job. | ||
| And, you know, Steve Baker, when he walked into the Capitol that day, he walked next to somebody else who was also a journalist. | ||
| But the difference is that journalist used the terms insurrectionist and other terms that the DOJ likes when he details his report. | ||
| And so he was never criminally prosecuted. | ||
| So we'll see how this all pans out. | ||
| Right now, we're at the beginning stages of this investigation. | ||
| You know, we can say that this just launched now as of today. | ||
| Matthew Griffith's office just getting this letter now. | ||
| So we'll see how this all plays out. | ||
| I think it's interesting that they're just launching it. | ||
| We've been calling for this for quite some time. | ||
| But it seems like the persecution of Steve Baker woke up a lot of members in the House on this. | ||
| And so we'll see how this all unravels. | ||
| But I really would love to see Garland have to answer for this as well. | ||
| Well, no doubt. And unfortunately, it still shows the fear of most Republicans with just the name or affiliation with Infowars. | ||
| But that is what it is. | ||
| It's the same reason why they censor us first and Republicans said nothing. | ||
| And then they all got censored and all of a sudden they found their voices. | ||
| But again, I could talk more about Graves spearheading this political persecution. | ||
| I'm sure you'll be talking more about this. | ||
| You could ask my attorney about it or other attorneys for J6 defendants about it as well. | ||
| But here's what I'm afraid of. | ||
| And this is exactly what I said when I talked to you on your show and other people interviewing me after my political persecution and incarceration. | ||
| I'm obviously a journalist. | ||
| I never went into the Capitol. | ||
| And I said my case would be the precedent-setting case, and they're going to go after other journalists. | ||
| So now three other journalists have been charged since my sentencing. | ||
| I have a feeling that three more, ten more, thirty more might be coming. | ||
| They're obviously ignoring the protection for journalists and don't even care about the First Amendment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Well, Owen, I think that you're right, and I think that the corporate media journalists know that, and that's why they haven't spoken up on Steve's behalf. | |
| They have been jarring. | ||
| I mean, we kind of expected it, though. | ||
| They've been quiet. They've been silent. | ||
| And it's funny, because there was also a reporter over at NBC News, Ryan Riley, who Refused to call Steve Baker, even a journalist, when he reported on Steve being arrested. | ||
| So I think they know what's going to happen to them, too, if they start speaking true to power. | ||
| And so they're fearful, and so they're just complying. | ||
| It's strange that they're all so afraid of this, that they were all kind of pulled together on this. | ||
| They'd be able to push back against the DOJ. But they're a conglomerate of cowards. | ||
| Well, they didn't say anything during the censorship of journalists on the internet. | ||
| And they're not saying anything now about the political persecution of journalists on the internet. | ||
| Because the left believes they're going to be the ones behind it at the end of the day. | ||
| Brandon Morello, thank you for breaking this story on the news. | ||
| We'll be following up with you later on. | ||
| Not all energy drinks, not all energy powders, not all energy pills are made equal. | ||
| A lot of them out there work really well. | ||
| They wake you up and for a long time. | ||
| The problem is they have a horrible letdown and they have ingredients in them that are not good for your body. | ||
| TurboForce was developed by one of the top scientists, sports nutrition experts in the country. | ||
| And obviously because of all the attacks on M4s, it was a private contract. | ||
| But we paid him to develop what he believed with the ingredients available would be the best, cleanest, long-term, 10-hour clean energy. | ||
| And we were able to develop turbo force. | ||
| Only takes a little bit, and it time releases. | ||
| Hits in about 30 minutes, but the different natural compounds that are in it synergistically work to give you energy on average for 10 hours with no letdown. | ||
| Now, that doesn't mean if you end up not sleeping all night on it, you're not going to be tired the next day. | ||
| But if you take it in the morning, say, and then work till midnight, I have no hangover from it. | ||
| My crew doesn't. The listeners love it. | ||
| So I want to encourage all the viewers and listeners out there that want to support the broadcast. | ||
| At the same time, get an incredible product. | ||
| Go to InfoWarsStore.com today and peruse the site. | ||
| And while you're there, get a canister of TurboForce. | ||
| We used to have it in little individual serving packets, but most folks told us the full packet's too much. | ||
| So now it's in a single scooper, and this formula is even stronger. | ||
| That's why it's TurboForce+. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, TurboForce doesn't just boost Your focus and your clarity and your stamina and your libido and so much more. | ||
| It doesn't just do it in a clean, focused way. | ||
| It also funds the Infowar. | ||
| Are there a few other energy drinks and energy mixes out there that are, quite frankly, just as good? | ||
| Yeah. This guy that developed ours developed those as well. | ||
| But this is in the top three or four in the world. | ||
| It works the best and it funds the Infowar. |
Export Selection