All Episodes
Feb. 15, 2024 - War Room - Owen Shroyer
02:25:48
Will Globalists Stage Nuclear Laser / EMP False Flag to Escalate War with Russia?
Participants
Main voices
h
harrison smith
01:58:41
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:54
j
jon bowne
02:18
Clips
b
bret weinstein
00:27
c
christopher a wray
00:14
k
karine jean-pierre
00:47
m
maria bartiromo
00:42
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
The silent majority is no longer silent.
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
jon bowne
Please stand by for further details.
unidentified
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
jon bowne
Between 1959 and 1961 under Mao Zedong, China starved an estimated 30 million Chinese people.
Mao's official goal was to quickly evolve China from a rural economy into a modern industrial society.
63 years later, after decades of industrialization aided by burgeoning world government, think tanks, and Kissinger acolytes, Mao's second coming, China's Xi Jinping is taking a giant leap into sovereign nations across the globe.
unidentified
The United States must make sure that we do not have a pure competitor for our security.
Think about what this means.
This is a brutalist philosophy.
If they actually appear to be succeeding, Regardless of their beliefs, we must stop them, even if it means pushing them back toward poverty.
Robert, I don't mean this question cynically or sarcastically, but what's wrong with that?
We wondered how all of these migrants knew about this particular entryway into California.
The answer was in their hands.
maria bartiromo
Oh, you learned on TikTok.
jon bowne
Yeah. Meanwhile, the borders are flooded with an occasional Chinese female, the uniquely rare Chinese child, and horde upon horde of Chinese military-aged males.
Are they simply Chinese special recon teams?
unidentified
San Vicente, first of all, it's not a town.
bret weinstein
This is a camp that is built as a transit camp, and it is almost entirely Chinese.
They are the opposite of forthcoming.
And I've been to dangerous places before.
I've been to places where people fear their government and can't talk to you because they feel it's not safe.
This didn't feel like that at all.
This felt like people who did not want to share information because it would be a mistake to do so.
maria bartiromo
I spoke with the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, Mark Green, and he told me, yes, he believes Xi Jinping is directing these people to come to America and perhaps act as saboteurs when Beijing directs them to do so.
In the fiscal year 2023, you've got 24,000 Chinese nationals having been apprehended.
That compares to just 2,000 people in 2022 and just 342.
In 2021. So clearly, Beijing sees the weakness in the White House as an opportunity to storm America, send these folks in here, and we don't know what their motivations are.
jon bowne
According to CCP textbooks, there is a tactic known as the armed work team behind enemy lines.
A team that, under the leadership of CCP, goes deep into enemy-occupied areas to carry out armed, military, economic, and organizational construction behind enemy lines.
Additionally, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, CISA, meekly published joint guidance on how to live off...
To live off the land.
unidentified
Before the first shot is fired in a war on Asia, they're just gonna turn off the lights, turn off the water, shut off the gas.
Nothing in the U.S. will work.
Just after he was elected, but before he took office, they had that famous lecture by a guy named Di Dongsheng, a famous academic.
He said, we own the White House.
When Biden gets back into the Oval Office, we're gonna determine American policy at the highest level.
christopher a wray
If you took every single one of the FBI's cyber agents and intelligence analysts and focused them exclusively on the China threat, China's hackers would still outnumber FBI cyber personnel by at least 50 to 1.
unidentified
We found out that the Chinese spy balloon was using an American Internet provider to send burst transmissions encrypted back to China, what they were finding around our nuclear facilities.
jon bowne
As the Biden administration crumbles, National security must be addressed post-haste by any remaining patriotic elements within America's military brass.
Time and investigations will tell if Biden did the unthinkable, allowing Chinese bio-warfare to eliminate U.S. citizens, followed by aiding enemy recon by Chinese spy balloons that revealed vulnerable military targets.
unidentified
The president ordered the Air Force to shoot it down as soon as it reached the Atlantic Ocean.
What were the orders? To shoot down a balloon six miles off the coast.
jon bowne
And allowing the CCP to position their soldiers within key choke points of critical infrastructure within the United States.
unidentified
Harrison Smith presents War Room on InfoWars.
harrison smith
Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen welcome to the war room infowars.com band.video please do share those links whether you're joining us on those sites or on rumble however you have found your way around the censorship blockade congratulations you are here another day another slew of absolutely insane news I died where where to even begin obviously we have the Russian space nukes issue.
Alex Jones just filed a pretty long report on that.
In fact, we might want to go to that a little bit later, if the guys can pull that in.
About a nine-minute dissertation on the existence of Operation Excalibur, Project Excalibur, nuclear-powered lasers from satellites.
It's interesting what you're allowed to believe these days.
Jewish space lasers, that's an insane conspiracy.
Russian space nuke lasers, well, that's a concern.
It's a major concern. And it just so happens to arrive at this moment of decision as the American Congress determines whether or not to send another $60 billion to the boondoggle in Ukraine.
And we'll get into what's going on in Ukraine here a little bit later as Russia seems to...
Seems to be coming to terms with the reality that this war is not going to end anytime soon.
They've offered peace deals.
They've been scuttled.
They've been purposefully shot down, not by Ukraine, but by the masters, the puppet masters that are controlling Ukraine.
It's happened again, and basically Putin is saying, all right, if you're not gonna, if we can't settle this diplomatically, I guess we'll just keep going.
I guess we'll just create a buffer zone where we'll take out some strategic points in order to establish a sort of buffer zone around the oblast, the domains that they've already captured.
So we'll get into that.
We'll get into why This suicidal drive towards Russia is what our New World Order leaders have decided we have to travel down.
But that's just the very beginning.
That's just the tip of the icebergs.
We have so, so many things to get into.
From crime, obviously the shooting at the Super Bowl parade in Kansas City, Missouri.
We'll talk about not just that.
How we got here, who the suspects are, why we aren't hearing too much about them, the inevitable, infuriating, and at this point annoying calls for gun control that seem to follow every mass shooting that could have been prevented with a little bit of basic law enforcement.
And we'll talk about the wider specter of crime and how it's being dealt with across America.
We also have a lot of health news to get into.
I think we will start with the Russian space laser...
whatever.
Whatever the PSYOP is they're trying to...
the weapons of mass destruction that we have to look for in space now, I guess.
So they're somewhere in space.
There's a few reasons why this doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
Now, when Alex Jones breaks it down, it makes sense because you have this...
It's not a nuclear weapon as you might typically understand.
It's a nuclear-powered laser weapon.
Chase Geiser, of course, is hosting American Journal this morning when we did the roundtable on the Alex Jones Show.
I think he had a good reading of it, which was that this is about maneuvering NATO into a position where it can claim that Russia is violating a treaty from 1967 that bans nuclear weapons in outer space.
So if you can claim that Russia has nuclear weapons out of space, you can claim they violated a treaty, and you can progress this towards open, direct conflict with Russia, which is obviously their ultimate goal.
I think that's a pretty good reading of this situation.
But there are some things that, to me, and I always try, whether it's a...
Geopolitical situation like this or a conspiracy theory about 9-11 or whatever.
You try to put yourself in the mindset of the people on the other side.
And you think, okay, would this be worth it?
How would I pull this off if I were them?
you know for 9-11 for example there are some pretty out there theories about
Planes landing and and the people being taken off them and then the
Planes that hit the towers being holograms and like all this complicated stuff and when I think about that if I'm
thinking about the situation from the perspective of
The people pulling off this attack. I think that's it's not worth it. I'm not gonna go through all that
I'm just gonna slam a plane into the building. That's that's that's actually the easiest way to go
Why introduce all of these fail point potential fail points in your plan?
When you can just fly the plane into the building right?
So when you look at the Russia nuke in space situation, I think a couple things.
First of all, it would be something that it would be very difficult to keep hidden.
After all, you can detect nuclear material.
You have nuclear material in space where other satellites can be scanning and detecting these things.
Hard to hide something in the vacuum of space.
Also, not necessary because there's this technology referred to as rods, the rods of God, which is a well-known and pretty old at this point technology where essentially you have tungsten rods that are about a foot by about 100 feet.
And if you drop them from space, they impact the Earth with...
Such devastating velocity that it's the equivalent of a nuclear bomb.
So again, I just ask myself, okay, if I want a weapon in space, am I going to have a nuclear weapon that's extremely difficult to build, extremely difficult to make work correctly, that could be detected, that would be in violation of a treaty?
Why would I do all of that when I could just send up a metal rod?
just a literal simple, not complicated stick of metal and have essentially the same effect.
One reason that you would want to have nukes is because you can detonate nukes in the upper
atmosphere and create an EMP, electromagnetic pulse that wipes out electronics over a wide
area.
But also Russia has incredibly advanced, more than anybody else in the world has, hypersonic
missiles that can travel in Mach 9 and can't be stopped and are as effective as any weapon
from space would be.
They're unstoppable, they can deliver warheads.
Why worry, why mess with things and satellites in space when you have ground launch or submarine
launchable missiles that can't be stopped and can hit your targets all over the world?
So again, there's a lot of things that it's like, why would they have nukes in space?
This just doesn't comport.
There's actually a story from last year, August of 2023, talking about China's hypersonic tungsten rod experiment challenges the U.S. rods from God's space weapon concept, a scientific experiment that suggests kinetic energy space weapon may not be as effective as previously thought, but still more or less as powerful as a nuclear weapon.
So again, these are just some thoughts about Immediate suspicions I have about the claims that were made yesterday about nuclear weapons that Russia has in space.
Some other things about this.
Obviously Trump was right about having a Space Force.
A lot of people wrote a lot of headlines about Trump being really dumb when he came to space.
The Space Force headlines.
Trump's stupid Space Force idea is dumb.
Well, not so much anymore, I guess.
So Trump was right. They can feel free to admit that whenever they want.
Another thing is that our satellite infrastructure, as it exists, is actually extremely vulnerable.
So there's some speculation about maybe this could be a space weapon that could disable satellites.
Well, satellites can be disabled from...
Earth's atmosphere, whether from missiles launched from the ground, or they've actually done tests, and there's really cool imagery of it, fighter jets that actually get extremely high into the atmosphere and then can target satellites like they target an enemy aircraft.
So there's ways to destroy satellites without putting things in space.
And there's also, I've heard this, I talked a little bit about it on The Space this morning on American Journal, but a couple years ago, long before I worked at Infowars, I was talking to a guy who builds satellites and had contracts with the DOD, and he actually was in the process of making 3D-printed solid-state rocket engines, which were really cool.
It was printed out of the fuel itself, actually.
So it was like solid fuel.
You'd print the rocket, and determining on how you printed it, it would determine how fast and how far the rocket would go.
Pretty cool stuff. So, you know, high-level, futuristic engineering technology.
And this guy told me that if you had about a dumpster full, like about a ton of ball bearings, you could basically wipe out every satellite in orbit.
Because there's something called, I think it's called cold welding.
There are some other terms too.
But essentially in a vacuum, like space, in a vacuum of space, assuming that it exists, assuming that we're not, uh, Assuming that the Earth isn't flat and that space does in fact exist, we're taking that as an assumption as we talk about all this.
Well, in the vacuum of space, if two metals of the same type touch each other, they become fused together.
So there's a friction when you're in an atmosphere on Earth that stops the molecules of the metal actually from binding together.
But in space... There's an absence of that.
And so metals, when they touch each other, actually bind together.
So if you were to just release essentially ball bearings of aluminum or whatever else satellites are made out of, you could basically disable every satellite in orbit and they would just spread naturally in the orbit at the level that satellites operate at.
The infrastructure of satellites and spacecraft is pretty vulnerable.
And it doesn't require a super sophisticated weapon system if the idea was to take these things out.
So these are just my thoughts.
These are just my first blush thoughts about the Russia space program fear-mongering that took place yesterday.
And then on top of that, obviously the timing, incredibly suspicious, right?
As Congress is talking about not sending tens of billions of dollars more to Ukraine, this undisprovable lie about Russian space weapons comes out.
And there's something so frustrating about being stuck in this loop where You could kind of understand back in 2001, 2002, 2003, in the run-up to the Iraq War, the threat of weapons of mass destruction, the September 11th attack.
Americans were on edge.
They wanted something done.
They took these threats seriously.
And at the time, Infowars, Alex Jones, people who watched him like myself, were arguing against intervention, pointing out that these things were lies, pointing out that the people in charge were trying to create an endless cycle of warfare for their own benefit.
There were no weapons of mass destruction ever.
But I can understand why people would say, hey, better safe than sorry, we better take the guy out.
We can't be having an anthrax bomb go off in the United States just because...
You know, you're suspicious of the weapons of mass destruction claim.
But we've been through that.
And we've been through it with Afghanistan.
And we've been through it with Ukraine, really, at this point.
And yet there's something in the American psyche that resets to a childlike form of gullibility when there's some threat announced by the intelligence agencies.
And that's who's announcing this, obviously.
And I don't get it.
I don't get how many times you have to get bit by the dog before you stop trying to pet
the dog.
How many times you have to get burned by the stove before you stop putting your hands on
the stove.
How many times the intelligence agencies can blatantly lie to us to get us into a war and
have Americans just like Goldfish can't remember 10 seconds ago and just fall for it again.
I don't get it.
I don't understand.
What price do we have to pay?
Is a trillion dollars not enough?
A million dead people not enough?
America's reputation destroyed overseas?
Afghanistan collapsing back into the control of Taliban after all of the money and all
of the weapons and all of the chaos and murder that we've brought there?
What has to happen for people to go, all right.
This time I'm going to need a little bit more proof.
This time I'm not just going to give you absolute permission to launch another war.
But it seems like we're in this cycle again and people are just suicidally gullible.
They just can't help themselves.
And we know why. We know exactly why.
It's because the psychological program that's being run...
Invokes fear to circumvent the logical part of the brain.
So you actually are reducing humans to an animal-like flight or fight response where they cannot think logically or reasonably about the information that they're getting.
They just want to do something.
And by do something I mean get us into another senseless pointless expensive murderous war
So those are my thoughts on that now when it comes to what's happening in Ukraine
Today gateway pundit has the story cut in half by Russians Avdiv Avdivka is reinforced by Ukraine Nazi Azov battalion
Massive missile strike on reinforcements causes some defenders to withdraw
the heavily fortified frontline town of Avdivka split in two by Russian forces witnesses some of the
Ukraine defenders begin to retreat of some areas to a four more favorable position and
Again there's been there was sort of a pause in Ukraine where Russia had largely achieved its territorial goals
They had fortified and reinforced the areas of Ukraine that they were laying claim to.
And they offered a peace deal, and it was agreed to by the Ukrainians.
And then Boris Johnson got involved and shot it down.
And then there was the Ukraine counteroffensive.
Which took place over the last year and utterly failed completely and embarrassingly.
And now it seems like Putin is ramping up the war machine again.
Basically he's going, okay, if you're not going to negotiate a settlement, if we aren't going to end hostilities here, then I need to create a buffer zone.
I need to get rid of these strategic areas right on the border.
Of the land that we've conquered.
And so he's moving forward. So all of this was avoidable.
All of this could have been avoided before it ever began by actually treating Russia like a Nation-state worthy of respect and not encroaching on their border, not overthrowing the Ukrainian government, not getting involved surreptitiously in the overthrow of the duly elected president and installing a puppet president.
We could have never done that.
Once that happened, we could have not supported the bombing campaign against Donetsk
and other places that were not happy with the coup that happened.
It could have been avoided before it ever began.
Once it began, it could have been ended early in 2022.
It could have ended again in 2023.
And time and time again, American NATO influence has prevented peace
from coming about.
And so now, as the Ukraine counteroffensive killed or brutally injured God knows many hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians and achieved nothing, well now Putin is going back on the offensive and...
We'll see where it ends. But Reuters published this a few days ago.
Putin's suggestion of Ukraine at ceasefire rejected by United States, sources say.
Russian President Vladimir Putin's suggestion of a ceasefire in Ukraine to freeze the war was rejected by the United States after contacts between intermediaries, three Russian sources with knowledge of the discussion told Reuters.
The failure of Putin's approach ushers in a third year of the deadliest conflict in Europe since World War II and illustrates just how far apart the world's two largest nuclear powers remain.
A U.S. source denied there had been any official contact and said Washington would not engage
in talks that did not involve Ukraine.
Putin sent signals to Washington in 2023 in public and privately through intermediaries,
including through Moscow's Arab partners in the Middle East and others, that he was ready
to consider a ceasefire in Ukraine, Russian sources said.
Putin was proposing a freeze to the conflict at the current lines and was unwilling to
cede any of the Ukrainian territory controlled by Russia, but the signal offered what some
of the Kremlin saw as the best path forward to peace of some kind.
The contacts with Americans came to nothing, a senior Russian source with knowledge of
the discussions in late 2023 and early 2024 told Reuters on condition of anonymity.
A second Russian source with knowledge of the contacts told Reuters that the Americans
told Moscow via the intermediaries that they would not discuss a possible ceasefire without
the participation of Ukraine and so the contacts ended in failure.
A third source with knowledge of the discussions said everything fell apart with the Americans.
The source said that Americans did not want to pressure Ukraine.
I don't know why not.
I don't know why you wouldn't want to pressure the country that's losing the war to perhaps
mitigate losses, call it quits and save the remnant of the generation that they've more
or less eliminated in that country.
unidentified
Bye.
harrison smith
But it's because it's not anything to do with Russia.
It doesn't have anything to do with Ukraine.
It doesn't have anything to do with what's best for Ukraine or the Ukrainian people or Ukrainian sovereignty or democracy or any of the very surface-level, shallow talking points that were given to justify this horrible war.
No, they want war with Russia.
They want Russia destroyed. They want regime change in Russia.
They don't like Putin being in charge.
They don't like Russia being an outlier of the global system.
And in fact, we just have time to go to Colonel Douglas McGregor, an interview that he did explaining why the powers that be so hate the Russian state.
unidentified
Clip number four. Remember, the globalist elites rule in Europe just as they rule here.
And they've all gotten where they are with the aid and assistance of enormous quantities of money.
Because the people that control your financial markets and financial institutions,
the people that control your mainstream media, they now control your governments.
And they don't represent the interests of any of the Europeans,
and I would argue of most Americans.
They represent their own interests, and their agenda is to destroy Russia.
Now, why?
Well, they'd like to replace Putin because Putin presides over the last major power in Europe,
and it is part of Europe that has a national identity, a national language, a national culture that rests on the
foundation of Orthodox Christianity.
That makes Russia the enemy of the globalists.
What have the globalists done to us?
What have the globalists done to the people in Western and much of Europe?
Well, they've flooded our countries with non-Europeans.
It's a specific goal of diluting us, weakening us, destroying our national identity, eliminating our national culture, certainly expunging any remaining power that Christianity may wield culturally inside the West.
And they want to do that to Russia because Russia has a bonus.
Resources. Enormous resources, mineral resources, agricultural resources, and obviously oil, gas, and many other rare metals.
These things are also at the top of the agenda.
So if you can destroy the Russian government, if you can remove Putin, if you can get into Russia, you can strip it of its resources and enrich yourself that much further than you've already done by your behavior over the last several, I would argue, decades.
So that's where we are, and that's why Russia has to go.
Russia's holding out.
harrison smith
And this does have to do with the Orthodox Christian nature of Russia.
And we'll get into that a little bit more on the other side.
So I think it might have to do with a prophecy that I've talked about for the last couple of years.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Can't help but feel like we're just in not a single endless cycle, but like a cycle of cycles.
We're in this rock tumbler of insanity continuously.
It's a little bit overwhelming sometimes.
So we're going to continue to talk about Russia.
That's one of them, is the fabricated threat from overseas.
That means we have to spend tens of billions of dollars in Star Wars, and everybody just falls for it.
It's like, oh my God, we have to do this again.
We have to argue about this again.
Again, we're going to tell you the truth.
You're going to say that we're...
Russian puppets, and then, what, 10 years, a million people, and a trillion dollars later, you'll admit that we're right.
We have to, again, we have to do this again, okay?
Great. And then there's the crime, the horrific crimes, where it's just like every couple of days there's some mass shooting, and there's calls for gun control, and there's another one the next day.
Yesterday was like a...
It's like we have all these different cycles.
Some operate a little slower and some are a little quicker.
Then every once in a while on a single day, you'll have all the cycles lining up.
And you get all of this insanity all at once.
So yesterday was one of those days.
And we'll get into the shooting in Kansas City.
The paucity of information about it.
And today I'm like sitting in the Alex Jones studio doing the roundtable during one of the commercial breaks.
I bring up Twitter. First thing that pops up, smoke fills D.C. metro station.
Fire crews investigate cause.
There's like smoke billowing out of this train station in D.C. Not sure if I put the video in there or not.
But it's like, okay, so there's like a bombing or a train derailment.
Basically, our cities are collapsing.
Our cities are collapsing, basically.
So I guess that's Another cycle to endure.
But it just goes on and on and on and feels totally overwhelming.
And I think the reason it feels overwhelming is because, obviously, the crises are largely manufactured.
They're largely the consequence of choices that are being made by the people in charge.
And we seem incapable in America of getting to the root of the issue and actually solving the problems At their basis, rather than treating the symptoms.
It's like we have terminal cancer, and all the doctors will do is treat the boils that are popping up on our skin.
It's like, no, we have cancer.
We need to solve the root problem, which is the cancer, not just, you know, put Band-Aids on the lesions that the cancer in our bones is creating in our skin.
We have a cancer of crime in this country.
We have a cancer of illegal immigration.
We have a cancer of the deep state and the military-industrial complex.
Until we can solve...
Those underlying issues then will be stuck in this endless cycle of debates about the wars or debates about gun control and crime and debates about illegal immigration.
We need to just solve these problems.
That's one of the most frustrating things is that we could.
We could solve these problems.
It's not actually impossible.
It is a choice. It is a choice we're making to allow these things to continue.
Like a doctor that just wants to keep getting paid so he doesn't cure the patient.
That is really how it seems.
So we're going to finish up talking about Russia here.
We're going to talk about what happened in Kansas City yesterday.
Trump is...
The persecution of Trump continues unabated.
And there's some updates to multiple trials and legal situations that he has been put in place.
We'll talk about the economy and some health news.
And if we can, I'd love to get some UFO stuff.
That might actually be fun to talk about.
But let's finish up with what's happening in Ukraine and Russia.
First of all, of course, the big fear-mongering talking point that was released yesterday in a very cinematic way where you had first leaks, rumblings of some danger.
We can't tell you what it is, but there's a threat.
It's a terrible threat, but that's all we'll tell you for now.
And then a little bit more came out.
Well, it has something to do with Russia.
More speculation, more hair pulling, more freaking out.
Well, it might have something to do with Russia in space.
And so slowly and surely this story got built up, dominated social media yesterday.
Today, hardly a word on it in the news.
You go to Google News, you go to...
Whatever news aggregator, mainstream media news aggregator you see, nobody's really talking about this threat.
Doesn't seem like that big of a deal, actually.
It was the biggest deal in the world yesterday.
Today, eh, not so much.
Very strange. It's almost like they tried another weapons of mass destruction scam and everybody, like enough people went, nah, we don't think so.
And they went, okay, never mind then.
We don't know. But the Kremlin responded to this.
And I'm reminded of a A tweet after the Putin interview where somebody's saying, look, it's not that I believe Putin.
It's that Putin says things that I know to be true.
And it's the same thing with Donald Trump, too, where we were watching on election night.
We watched the numbers change.
We watched the...
Vote counting gets shut down, only to secretly continue.
We watched the vote counters put up barriers to prevent anybody from observing the count taking place.
We watched that happen, okay, live.
We talked about it live.
We said, look, they're stealing the election right now.
Here, it's happening. Let's watch.
And then later, Trump says, yeah, they stole the election, and suddenly it becomes, oh, you just believe Trump's lies about the election.
No, I saw it with my own eyes.
Trump also apparently saw it, but it's not us believing Trump.
In the same way, when Putin says things that are true about the American-Russian relationship, American actions in Ukraine prior to 2022, when he talks about these things, it's not that I'm believing Putin.
It's that I already know these things to be true, and so I know Putin is telling the truth about these.
And so when I hear the statement from the Kremlin about the supposed space weapons— It rings true because it's what they're saying is true.
So what they say is that the Kremlin dismissed on Thursday a warning by the United States about Moscow's new nuclear capabilities in space, calling it a, quote, malicious fabrication and a trick by the White House aimed at getting U.S. lawmakers to approve more money to counter Russia.
Yeah, sounds about right.
Sounds about right.
Didn't need the Kremlin to tell me that's what was happening.
But sure makes the Kremlin seem honest.
Because this is what America does.
Because the American regime is desperate to continue to spend our tax money on the war in Ukraine.
And since a lot of Americans aren't falling for that anymore, they fabricated a malicious fabrication and a trick.
The United States told Congress and allies in Europe about new intelligence related to Russian nuclear capabilities that could pose an international threat.
A source briefed on the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.
And the Kremlin says, quote, It is obvious that the White House is trying by hook or crook to encourage Congress to vote on a bill to allocate money.
This is obvious, he said.
We'll see what tricks the White House will use.
Yeah, he's right. He's right, and it's pretty undeniable because they do it over and over and over and over and over and over again.
Ukraine, meanwhile, has withdrawn units from parts of Avdivka, and they sent in the Azov Brigade.
Cut in half by Russians, Avdivka is reinforced by Ukrainian Nazi Azov Battalion.
As again, Russia seemed okay with staying where they were, with having the lines drawn as they stood.
But then when America refused to have any negotiations or any diplomatic dealings with Russia at all, Russia said, okay, well then we're going to keep going because now we need a buffer zone.
Because if you're not going to make peace, then we need to ensure the safety.
Of the zones that we've captured.
InfoWars has this story from Dan Lyman.
Trump could force Ukraine to make peace, according to the MSM. Republican presidential frontrunner, ex-president Donald Trump, is planning to pressure Ukraine to negotiate peace with Russia if he wins an unexpected rematch against incumbent Joe Biden for the White House.
Should Trump become president, he may also retract a number of defense commitments to some NATO allies, according to the reports.
People familiar with the matter said Trump advisors had talked about ways of bringing Zelensky to the negotiating table.
One advisor, according to Bloomberg, suggested that Washington could push Kiev to engage with Moscow by threatening to cut massive military assistance, adding that Russia could be swayed by the threat of increasing that aid instead.
And basically, MSM is terrified that Trump might bring peace.
Not peace. No, we've got to make money for military contractors.
We've got to control the world like psychopaths.
Not peace. We can't have peace.
Welcome back, folks. This is War Room.
Like I said, we are...
Oh, you know what? I think I... Did I forget to put in the video?
I've got to put in another video here because...
We're going to talk about crime.
So we're going to talk about crime and...
I did some research into some of the stuff being said by KGP, Corrine Jean-Pierre, when she was asked about crime in the nation's capital.
So I've got to put that video in so I can add context for the articles that I printed out.
So I'm dropping that in right now.
We'll call that clip 12. But we're going to talk about crime, and we're going to start off by talking about what we know about what happened yesterday at the Kansas City Chiefs Parade.
Not a lot. Not a lot of information coming out about this, which in itself actually gives us some pretty good information.
Because obviously, you've got a mass shooting at a major public event with multiple shooters, by the way.
So, that leaves us with a couple options.
Either this was a coordinated, organized attack by some sort of terrorist group, or it was...
Like a gang fight that got out of hand.
Somebody stepped on somebody's shoes and somebody else pulled out a gun and started firing wildly into a crowd with no reason, with no underlying purpose or cause or intent to actually do mass damage.
Just poor aim, I guess.
Which is what actually happened.
If it was a white Christian guy, well, that would be plastered everywhere.
It's not. So we can assume, and some of the images seem to show, that the shooters were black and were targeting each other.
Newsweek has a strange article title where they say, Who are the Kansas City shooting suspects?
What we know... And then there's a complete paucity, a total absence of any information at all in the entire article.
So what we know is that three people have been detained for questioning in connection to the shooting at the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl 58 victory parade Wednesday afternoon, according to police.
Officials say one person was killed and up to 21 others injured in the shooting.
Although another story we have has that number at 22 injured and one person killed.
There's actually a video of this that took place.
Pretty scary stuff. Clip number 10.
We can roll as B-roll. A video that shows the moments gunfire erupts at the Super Bowl.
A bird's eye view as people flee the area.
And, obviously, a tragedy in more ways than one, right?
Not to be flippant about it, but it's kind of the, you know, this is why we can't have nice things.
This is why we can't have parades.
This is why we can't do things where our community comes together to celebrate something, even something as...
You know, in the long term, in the bird's eye view, sort of meaningless, right?
A sports team winning a victory.
Not actually anything, you know, you've got other countries where they come together to celebrate meaningful things.
But hey, we have football, so we come together for that.
And it's an important aspect of the cohesion of our culture and nation and people.
But will there ever be one again?
We don't know. I mean, I don't know.
Will people feel safe going to anywhere?
I mean, this place had something like 800 police officers trying to keep people safe, and yet a shooting takes place, and really a tragic one, because of the ages of the people who were shot.
22 people, in this article from KMBC, I think this is a more up-to-date article from the local Kansas City paper, Graves confirms that the 22 shooting victims ranged from between 8 years old and 47 years old.
At least half of the victims are under the age of 16.
So pretty tragic.
So at least seven of these victims were under the age of 16.
Seven people under the age of 16 shot as a result of this shooting.
And again, it's not in the character that you typically think of when you hear mass shooting at public event.
It sucks that we have something that can be described as typical, like that.
But you know, you've got...
The typical, the standard idea of like a crazy person, a terrorist, somebody who's been radicalized going into a school or going to a public event with a gun with the intention of killing as many people as possible.
That doesn't seem to be what happened here.
What seemed to have happened here is that there was some sort of fight.
People pulled out guns, started trying to shoot each other, and were in the middle of a giant crowd when they did so.
Now, the focus in this place, I would like to focus on, and we go to clip 11 here, the heroes that actually tackled the guy.
In case you needed a little silver lining to this cloud, a little bit of hope for the future, there are still American men who will throw themselves in the line of fire, put themselves at physical risk to save others, and...
There's a hell of a lot more of these guys than there are...
criminal idiots firing guns in a crowd.
So I want to go to this video, clip number 11.
Here's the man who tackled the shooter at the Super Bowl parade.
unidentified
One guy was hollering, saying, you know, stop him, or catch him, you know, tackle him, whatever.
And he's just bailing, running.
And out of nowhere, I heard that guy hollering, so I'm just like, okay, well...
I'm right here, and I just...
I didn't think about it.
It was just a reaction.
I didn't hesitate. It was just, just do it.
So I went to go tackle him, and another gentleman did the same thing.
And as I'm tackling him, I see his weapon either fall out of his hand or out of his sleeve, because he was wearing a long jacket or, like, a Carhartt.
So when I seen that hit the ground, I'm like, oh...
You know, we got to take this guy down.
And so, like I said, I did, and another good Samaritan did, and we held him down.
And it seemed like forever, but it probably wasn't.
It was like 30 seconds holding him down, and me and the other gentleman hollering at on-goers, you know, where's the cops?
You know, get the cops over here.
Get the cops over here. You know, we got them.
harrison smith
Yeah, so, you know, real life, real life hero.
And it's wonderful to see.
But obviously, this is not a symptom of guns, okay?
This is not a symptom of radicalization.
This is a symptom of crime.
This is an expression of the cancer of urban crime in this country, for which Kansas City, Missouri is a hot point, is a place overwhelmed with gun crime and gangs.
And the uncomfortable truth about this is that it's largely a black phenomenon.
These shooters were black as far as we can tell from the photos, but again, the media is not reporting on it, which is A, evidence that they are a minority of some sort because that's the only time they withhold that type of information.
But there's pictures of people published of a black guy sitting on the ground being arrested, and they say, here's the shooter, but there's no confirmation of that, so I can't say that for sure, but I'd bet a lot of money on it.
And we're going to talk a little bit here about just the poison of racial politics.
Which I know might sound strange because here I am bringing race into it, but the point is that
the reason we're in this situation is because of the focus on race. The reason that crime is out
of control is because racially motivated policies have allowed criminals to run rampant and it's not
good. One of the things that has to do with Kansas City in particular is Operation Legend
or LeGend, L-E-G-E-N-D. It was named after a four-year-old kid named Legend, but the G is
capitalized anyway. This was a policy of Donald Trump to send in federal law enforcement to places
that had defunded the local police following the George Floyd riots. Okay, so this is the
the Wikipedia page. Trump began deploying federal law...
So you've got...
George Floyd overdosing on fentanyl, right?
You've got the George Floyd movement defunding the police, violent crime exploding because of that racialized, very stupid policy of defunding the police.
Donald Trump institutes Operation Legend to use federal resources to make up for that because, again, defunding the police really means two things, privatizing the police and federalizing the police.
In this case, it was federalizing the police.
the city of Kansas City.
Unfortunately, this was a.
Effective very effective operation Operation Legend that
was immediately ended as soon as President Biden got into
office. Despite it having huge success, specifically in
somewhere like Kansas City, Missouri. Five days after
Mayor Lucas's letter was sent.
The United States Department of Justice announced Operation
Legend initiative on July 8th 2020 to bring federal law
enforcement agents to Kansas City to assist local authorities
in their investigation.
The President's response to this letter came as
soon as he withdrew that federal support. And the
violent crime rate spiked in Kansas. And what we saw
yesterday was an outgrowth of that was an expression. Of that
tolerance of violent crime and the proliferation of gangs. And
So we'll get back into this on the other side, talk about how this is a nationwide phenomenon, and how the Democrats aren't done.
They have more racialized policies to further Eliminate law enforcement in this country to make it more dangerous because they're dumb.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. If you watched American Journal yesterday, you know I spent quite a while on this very topic against my will, essentially, because, well, we were talking about interracial crime in particular.
We spent like an hour on it.
I don't like showing these videos.
I don't like It's upsetting to me like it's upsetting to everybody.
I don't, you know, glory in showing this stuff or even talking about it.
But everybody else is too scared to talk about it, so I guess we have to.
Everybody else is afraid of looking racist when in reality, just thinking about it like anybody should, when you have a community in your nation that is racked with violent crime, that is overwhelmingly the victim and perpetrator of violent crime, To an obscene degree, that's a problem that you should want to solve.
And you can't solve a problem without first diagnosing it.
Going back to the cancer metaphor.
It's like people are so scared of the cancer that they can't tell you you have cancer.
So how are you ever going to do the things you need to do to solve the thing that's killing you if the doctor is afraid to tell you what's actually happening?
So we have a problem in this country.
With black crime. And I hate even having to do this little disclaimer thing, but again, anytime you talk about race, it is just the nature of the conversation that people will assume that you're being racist.
I just want to make it clear. I want everyone in this country to be able to be safe.
I want everyone to be able to go to parades without getting shot and go to the corner store at 3 a.m.
without being raped. That's all I want, and I want that for black people just like I want it for white people.
But the problem is overwhelmingly in the black community.
From the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, black Americans account for 60% of firearm homicides each year.
Black people continue to be disproportionately affected by gun violence as they account for 60% of all firearm homicides, yet make up just 14% of the population, according to a new study.
of course, it's not the old black folks or the black women that are doing it. So really,
you're down to about 6% of the population being young black men, accounting for 60%
of the firearm homicides. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence analyzed firearm mortality
rate data from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention between 2017 and 2021. Researchers
found that the average firearm mortality homicide rate for black people of all ages was 21.05
per 100,000 people compared with 1.93 per 100,000 for non-Hispanic white people. So
21 versus 2. Massive, massive disparity.
The largest disparity was in the 18 to 24 age group where black people had a firearm mortality rate of 58%.
3.78 per 100,000 people compared with 3.1 per 100,000 for white people in that same age group.
So, again, the comparison between black and white for the 18 to 24 age group, 3.1 per 100,000 for whites, 59 per 100,000 for blacks, 3 versus 59.
So, again, massive, massive, overwhelming over-representation.
CNN Health also just published this chart, firearm homicide rates by race, and they go through state by state.
I guess starting with the worst, but Missouri, white 2.77, black 59.42, Michigan, white 1.52, black 49.14.
So again, similar disparities across the board.
When divided by race, they give you the difference here, 56.65 or 47.62.
Again, massive disparity. Now this is I believe victims of homicide, but it's because the victims usually match the race of the perpetrators.
It's not black people being gunned down by white people.
It is black people being gunned down by black people.
So that's a big problem, and it's only going to get worse.
I'm about to get into, on the other side, some of the new policies being pursued by the idiot, racist, leftist people.
In their seemingly purposeful pursuit of just the most murder they can possibly get.
What's the real threat to America?
Is it Russian space lasers or is it Democrat policy?
Yeah, we'll answer that on the other side.
unidentified
Stay with us. The war room with Harrison Smith is where the shields of truth are forged in the fires of inquiry.
harrison smith
You'll never solve a problem if you can't identify it first.
If you divide violent crime by race in America, if you exclude black and Hispanic perpetrators, America has a similar violent crime rate Places like Denmark or Sweden.
Especially gun violence.
The overwhelming representation of Americans in violent crime and gun violence in particular is driven almost entirely by gang activity and almost entirely by African-American gang activity.
If you can't identify the problem, you'll never solve it.
And as we just showed you, it's not just the overwhelming representation.
At this point, 14% of the population committing 60% of the firearm violence.
But obviously, they are also the overwhelming victims of this violence.
So again, we're in this bizarre situation where race is so fraught in this country.
It's so sensitive that you can't talk about it, but okay, we'll never solve it.
It just makes no sense. So obviously following the shooting at the Kansas City Super Bowl parade, the calls for gun control inevitably follow when that's not actually the issue.
It's not actually the problem.
The problem is Unpunished crime.
The problem is criminal gangs.
The problem is a lack of any positive culture in the black community right now.
And whether that's because of the music that gets produced, I mean, we know.
We know that a lot of the music that's produced, the violent, you know, The violent rap, all that sort of stuff.
It's on purpose. It's by design.
And you know it's by design because a lot of times the people that make this music aren't criminals.
Sometimes they are, but most of the time, you know, somebody like Lil Wayne, dude's got a college degree, right?
They pay money. He's not out there shooting people.
He's not out there doing drugs.
But that's what his music is filled with.
So they know it's not good.
They know it's not good for them. It's not good for anybody.
But the producers of the music push that.
Whatever it is, if we can't talk about it, then we'll never solve it.
So I guess, is this Kelsey?
Yeah, Travis Kelsey. There need to be more strict gun laws, especially when toddlers are dying.
We can't have that in our communities.
But once again, just like a lot of the shooting that takes place in America...
The people with the guns shouldn't have guns anyway.
Most of them are felons.
Most of them have something that means they shouldn't have guns in the first place.
So more laws aren't going to help when the laws on the books don't stop them.
So this doesn't make any sense.
The people that it would stop would be the legal gun owners who aren't the problem.
So again, if you can't identify the problem, then you're offering solutions for something completely different.
Doesn't stop them. They say the same thing over and over.
Democrat California Governor Newsom, we need to pass constitutional amendment against guns.
California's Democrat Governor Gavin Newsom responded to the tragic shooting at Kansas City's Super Bowl parade in Missouri Wednesday by suggesting America add to its constitution anti-gun measures already prohibited by the Founding Fathers' historic document.
Newsom shared a video of press conference briefing by Kansas City Police Chief Stacey Graves telling reporters people who came to the celebration should expect a safe environment this tragedy occurred even in the presence of uniformed officers.
The governor shared her quote and said, We cannot accept the status quo.
We need to pass a constitutional amendment to prevent gun violence nationwide.
What does that even mean?
You've got gangbangers getting into fights and crowds and shooting wildly at children as if they would stop and go, Oh, wait, no, I'm sorry, this is against the Constitution, what we're doing.
It's already against the Constitution to shoot people.
You know that, right? Do they know that?
California, of course, boasts the highest number of mass shootings of any state in the country while having some of the most extreme gun control in the nation.
None of this seems to ever make sense.
Another thing that never makes sense, they're calling for President Biden put out a tweet today saying we have to get rid of assault rifles, assault weapons, whatever he calls them.
Okay, but the shooting at Kansas City, I'm fairly certain, was with handguns.
So this is like the insanity.
You've got people shooting, like, people with illegally purchased guns, handguns, shooting, and the solution these people offer, the Democrats offer, is we have to make it harder to legally get guns, and we have to eliminate assault rifles.
So they want to implement laws that would do absolutely nothing to prevent the event that they are using to justify the laws.
And they do it with statistics as well.
They'll show you the statistics of gun crime in the country, which is vastly, the vast majority of which is done with pistols.
And they'll use that number and say, see, we have to get rid of assault rifles, which makes up a tiny little sliver of the gun crime.
Hardly even noticeable. More people get killed by hammers every year.
So, just, you know, taking our cancer metaphor, I mean, this is literally somebody dying from cancer, desperately treating themselves for lupus.
It's like, okay, well, it's just not going to work.
It's not going to work because you're not identifying the correct underlying cause of all of this.
And again, it's important to mention race in all of this because that's what Democrats
are using to justify the actions that are making, that's making everything worse.
How do I present?
I'll present this one first.
Okay.
Peace.
San Francisco Poll finds most voters want police to get facial recognition drones.
See, if you don't put the criminals in jail, you have to live in a jail.
If you don't lock up the shoplifters, you have to put cages around the items in the store.
And if you don't put your criminals in prison, Then you have to take extreme measures like have facial recognition drones flying around everywhere.
So I don't want to live in a surveillance state.
I don't want to live in a world where we have drones flying around scanning our faces.
That just opens up a barrel of worms that we don't want to have to deal with.
But that's the extremity to which these people are going because they refuse to acknowledge surveillance.
The real underlying problems here.
A new poll released by the San Francisco Chamber of Commerce found that a majority of voters support a citywide ballot initiative that would give the San Francisco Police Department more latitude to conduct vehicle pursuits and use surveillance technology to apprehended subjects.
The poll released Wednesday shows that 61% of respondents support Proposition E, which is one of the measures that Mayor London Breed placed on the March 5th ballot.
Only 37% of respondents said they oppose the measure.
Under current policy set by San Francisco's Police Commission, police officers may initiate a vehicle pursuit only if they believe there's either a fleeing suspect has committed a violent felony or if the person poses an immediate risk to public safety.
Chicago has similar rules where you have to actually radio in and get permission
to pursue a subject even on foot. And the solution is surveillance technology,
surveillance drones flying around scanning faces.
Wonderful. Which again, you know, whether this is on purpose or whether it's just a natural outcome of problem-reaction solution, but these people want a surveillance state, they want technology to track and control the population, and then they put into place Beef on the police and other pro-crime policies that bring about a situation of desperation in which people are happy to welcome the dystopian hellish control grid because they just want to be safe.
Now, that's San Francisco.
Which obviously implemented a lot of anti-police activity.
I mean, San Francisco is one of the places where they say, we will no longer be publishing pictures of suspects because it can be deemed racist, right?
Because the suspects are overwhelmingly black, not white.
And so they call that racist and then refuse to publish the pictures, meaning the criminals are more likely to get away, meaning they're more likely to commit more crimes, meaning you're just making the problem worse.
On the basis of race.
They're making these decisions on the basis of race, which is why we can't avoid the topic.
Chicago is going even further.
So, drones that can scan your face, sort of a horrifying advancement into the dystopian surveillance grid.
But there's other technology that you can use that doesn't violate your Fourth Amendment rights or violate your right to privacy or violate anything.
But can be extremely effective in making things safer or helping to guide police as they pursue suspects.
One of these things is called ShotSpotter.
ShotSpotter equipment is a surveillance technology, but it uses acoustic sensors to detect and locate gunshots, alerting law enforcement in real time.
So basically there's microphones everywhere, and when a gunshot goes off, The microphone dings and you have three microphones or more and you can triangulate where the shot came from so you can get a real-time instant update.
The police get an alert.
A bullet was just fired at this intersection and they can go and be dispatched and see what's going on without anybody even having to call them.
Now, there's not a lot of ways that this could be misused.
I mean, it's microphones, but they're not really sensitive enough to pick up voices.
Like, it's not a surveillance technology that you typically think about.
It's more of a...
I mean, it's pretty pure, right?
It just... It hears the gunshot, and it triangulates where the gunshot is.
Not a lot of rights being violated in that case.
But Chicago's getting rid of this.
Chicago is shutting this down and scrapping this system.
Why? Why?
Because the shot spotter system sends police to black communities and Hispanic communities more than white communities.
So because black and Hispanic communities shoot guns more, and so are therefore more often identified by the shot spotter technology...
In the madness of liberalism, that means that the shot spotter technology is racist and should therefore be taken out.
So again, making these communities more dangerous because it would be racist to make them safer.
So let's go now to clip number five.
Here is Mayor Brandon Johnson talking about ending the use of shot spotter technology in Chicago because it's racist, obviously.
unidentified
The campaign promise fulfilled.
Mayor Brandon Johnson is ending the city's use of the controversial gunfire surveillance system known as ShotSpotter.
The city's contract with the company behind ShotSpotter expires on Friday, and the police will stop using the technology September 22nd, about a month after the Democratic National Convention.
A city statement said, Moving forward, Chicago will deploy its resources on the most effective strategies and tactics proven to accelerate the current downward trend in violent crime.
For years, grassroots organizations targeted ShotSpotter.
harrison smith
Because it's racist.
Because it's racist to identify where shots are coming from.
Chicago spends $9 million a year on ShotSpotter.
But it's racist.
It's racist because black neighborhoods are where the gunfire happens.
I don't know. I don't think I need to elaborate on it.
I think it should be pretty self-evident how ridiculous this is.
It's not about concerns for privacy.
It's not about, well, we think, you know, this is not...
I mean, they say they question the efficacy, but it's perfectly effective.
There's nothing ineffective about it.
It just happens to identify black people more than white people, so therefore it has to go.
So now the black people will be less safe and the gunshots that happen in their neighborhoods, whether the shot spotter is there or not, will go undetected rather than being detected and having some law enforcement there to protect the people.
It's all just completely insane and it's only getting worse.
So when you talk about what the biggest threat to America is, Joe Biden will tell you it's white supremacy.
Madness. The powers that be will tell you it's Russian space nukes.
Total false flag.
But this is the world we live in.
Real problems are just made worse by the policies of these people who then invent fake problems that they try to solve for no reason or really create actual problems that we then have to deal with.
And that's The ultimate thing here.
And before we get to the way that immigration is helping just give us a whole new and endless replenishment, a supply of criminals, I want to go to that video of Corrine Jean-Pierre because she was asked about violent crime in D.C. and gave a typically democratic, that is to say, Moronic answer.
So let's go now to that clip of Karine Jean-Pierre being asked about the just massive crime in every major city, but in particular, in this case, the Capitol.
unidentified
Here in the district, it is not.
There were 274 homicides here in the District of Columbia in 2023.
That's the highest murder rate in more than two decades since 1997.
This is the president's home at least a few days a week.
What can he do personally about reducing the level of crime that we're seeing here in the nation's capitals?
karine jean-pierre
So let me just be very clear, all violent crime, not just here, all violent crime anywhere is completely unacceptable.
We just want to make that very clear here.
You know, every community in this country should feel safe, want to be safe, and so that's important.
But I will say this, you know, congressional Republicans They don't seem to feel that way.
And I say this because the president has taken action.
From the first piece of legislation that he signed into law, American Rescue Plan, only Democrats voted for that.
Republicans didn't vote for that.
There was billions of dollars in that plan to deal with crime, to make sure there were more law enforcement in communities, to make sure that communities are able to keep families and Americans safe.
They didn't vote for that.
harrison smith
Okay, so just so we're clear here...
When asked about the overwhelming crime spike that occurred as a direct consequence to the far leftist insanity program of defunding the police, because police is racist, y'all, she blames Republicans.
She blamed Republicans for that.
And this just goes back to just the utter madness that I struggle to deal with on a daily basis where you have a year of Democrats saying, defund the police.
And that, in the first place, you're like, wait, what the hell are you talking about?
That's crazy. That's a crazy thing to say.
But they get these bills passed in like two weeks.
Things get obviously worse.
For a year, we're sitting here going, stop defunding the police.
Look at the murder rates. Look how they're spiking.
Please stop defunding the police.
This is retarded. What are you doing?
And then... Through some sort of weird rhetorical alchemy, suddenly it becomes, well, the Republicans don't like the FBI, so actually it's the Republicans that want to defund the police, and they didn't vote for the American Rescue Plan, so it's their fault that crime happened in the city.
Here's an issue with that, though.
It did pass, he did sign it into law, and crime is worse than ever before.
So essentially what you're saying is this hallmark anti-crime supposedly bill that Biden
signed into law was completely ineffective and didn't help at all.
So Republicans were probably right to vote against it because it passed anyway and crime
is still terrible and it did nothing to mitigate that.
On top of that, when you actually look in to the American Rescue Plan, it had very little
money for law enforcement.
Money that wasn't even necessary in the first place because these cities deliberately bankrupted their police departments.
So it wasn't like necessary.
It wasn't like they were like, we're trying to hire police and we just don't have money.
Please, federal government, give us money to hire police.
They had plenty of money.
They had big police departments and they cut them in half.
So, not even necessary in the first place.
And then, of course, when they do offer money to neighborhoods or cities to hire police, it wasn't to hire police.
It was to hire, like, community intervention experts, social workers, right?
It was not to hire police, for the most part.
It was billions of dollars...
For ridiculous nonsense. That did nothing.
Because it did pass. It did get implemented.
It has been two years since...
Or three years at this point since it was put into place.
And... Crime is just as bad as ever.
So... So they're blaming Republicans for the crime in Democratic cities because Republicans didn't vote on the bill that passed and didn't lower crime.
I mean, this is...
It's all so stupid.
It's all just so stupid. So if you actually look at the...
American Rescue Plan Act of 2021.
Was it about crime?
Was this an attempt for Democrats to wrestle back law and order from the Republicans who were defunding?
No, it was called the COVID-19 stimulus package.
Actually, it was about COVID-19.
So, just nothing about this is honest in the slightest.
Not even a little bit.
But it did get passed and some money went towards relief.
Obviously, a vast majority of it or a vast amount of it was stolen straight up.
And there's article after article about that.
Money being taken from the so-called COVID funds to pay for illegal immigration and so much other.
But if you just search American Rescue Plan and go through some of the headlines you find, $15 million in the American Rescue Plan went to fund anti-racism and social activism program for kids.
See, this is what she means. This is the stuff that...
This is the billions of dollars that she means.
New York Museum received $50,000 in ARP funds to build a bronze park statue that addresses black masculinity.
Great. So again, this did pass.
I mean, it got implemented.
So how she can even say that it's Republicans' fault for not voting on the thing that still got implemented?
It's all so stupid.
$825,000 in the American Rescue Plan funds went to oral historians researching anti-racism and Latinx histories.
Wonderful. Wonderful.
Of course, it drove up inflation massively.
American Rescue Plan funds went to LGBTQ Center that hosted Drag Queen Story Hour for kids at Public Library.
So this is what the Republicans were voting against.
It passed anyway.
The money was dispersed.
The crime did not get better.
And now, as crime continues to spiral out of control, the Democrats that put this into place, this totally ineffective, nonsensical COVID relief bill, are claiming it's Republicans' fault for not voting on it.
Just try to wrap your mind around that one, folks.
Of course, George Soros has a lot to do with this.
Funding DAs, funding police departments, funding organizations.
Lobbying to defund the police because, I remind you again, police is racist, y'all.
Listening to gunshots is racist as well.
Showing pictures of people who commit crime, that's racist.
Looking at stats and dividing it by race, obviously racist.
Stats, mathematics, that's racist, you guys.
And this is actually a pretty cool story.
Gateway Pundit, Ms. Pittsburgh...
Queen of Pittsburgh creates Survivor PAC to stop Soros-funded pro-crime politicians.
So while we don't have billionaires with infinite money to fund the destruction of our country, we don't have the billionaires to counteract that, we can combine our forces and hopefully mitigate some of the damage done.
By people like George Soros and the Democrats who have seemingly done everything possible to bring about violence, chaos, and misery so they can implement surveillance, control, and have us live in an open-air prison rather than putting the criminals in prison once and for all.
And we'll get into how illegal immigrants are contributing to this on the other side, so stay with us, folks.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Yes, apparently Fannie Willis is making a fool of herself in this trial about her corruption.
Crew's going to grab some clips from that.
We'll bring you that later in the show.
I was hoping to open up the phone lines today, but I don't know if I will be able to because we're going to continue talking about crime and the deliberate creation of Just horrible, horrible crime and just everything in this country.
We'll continue to do that in this segment.
We're also going to talk about what's going on in Israel and just a lot of other stuff to get into.
So the question that we were discussing during the Nights of the InfoWars Roundtable on the Alex Jones Show today was, what is the biggest threat to America?
Is it Russian space nukes?
Is it Iran?
Is it white supremacy?
Or is it things that are real and actually destroying our country?
The answer is obvious.
The answer is undeniable.
The answer is...
Basically, Democrat policy.
It's Democrat policy.
It's leftist, Democrat, deconstructionist, communistic, equality policy that is making everything more dangerous, that is allowing criminals off the hook, that is diverting resources towards things that don't hurt anybody, like investigations into domestic terrorists and white supremacists that don't exist, while our inner cities collapse We're good to go.
A roller backpack. We're expected to believe this dude is escaping.
He's claiming asylum because he's escaping China in his galoshes with his roller back.
He rolled his roller backpack.
On the dusty road from Panama to the southern border, it's an invasion.
There's an invasion taking place.
So we want to talk about threats on the geopolitical sphere, whether it's terrorists coming in or Chinese behind enemy lines subversives being sent here, as the report from John Bowne that we opened the show with today talked about.
That's a major issue. But then on just the crime side of things, not only do you have 14% of the population committing 60% of the gun violence, but you also have basically every major city specifically writing laws to allow that to happen longer.
And now we've got this new issue.
Little issue. South American crime rings have spread across America, stealing millions, just like we've warned.
From BizPack Review, more and more communities are starting to be alerted to the rise in organized theft by criminal illegal aliens.
BizPack Review first approached the topic in December, noting that at that time, transnational organized crime groups from South America were burglarizing an increasing number of homes across America.
We actually have a news report about this happening, I believe, outside of Chicago.
Let's go to clip number eight here.
Talking about the way that illegal immigrants who have been allowed across our border have been brought here by the UN, by our funds.
Our tax dollars have gone to organizations who bring these people into the country.
Our tax dollars are paid for the lawyers that argue that they deserve asylum.
Our Border Patrol is the one busing them further into the country and giving them plane tickets and thousands of dollars, but it's not enough.
They see America as a big CVS. Just get in there and loot as much as you can.
There's no punishment for it.
And even the former FBI assistant director is making pretty dire warnings about this.
But first, let's go to clip eight here.
Organized gang of illegal migrants have stolen millions outside Chicago.
unidentified
Or Detroit, rather....at the Country Club of Detroit in Grosse Pointe Farms.
The organized burglary teams hitting here over the last weekend, and if a home backs up to trees or woods, it becomes a target.
Thieves hiding there until they see their chance.
Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard first sounded the alarm in September after huge homes in Bloomfield Township were hit, then homes on private drives in Birmingham.
The losses were in the millions.
In our area, they are targeting jewelry, precious metals, high-end items such as purses, electronics, currency, high-end watches.
And if there's a safe that's not attached or they can either break into on scene or carry, they'll do that.
Now remember, a teen was arrested and charged in Bloomfield Township with a string of car break-ins and some burglaries.
But tonight, sources continue to point to what the sheriff pointed to at the very start, that other organized teams out of South America have been hitting high-end homes out west and now have made their home right here.
Typically in our area, it's between 5 and 9 p.m.
Preferred targets on a lot of these across the country are homes that are isolated.
They back up to wooded areas, trails, golf courses.
Here's another thing that we're not hearing or seeing in these high-end burglaries.
Look, there's no video of these guys.
There's video cameras everywhere, especially on these homes, but they're able to get around that somehow.
There are alarm systems all over these homes, in the homes, outside of the homes.
harrison smith
They're getting around that, too. You know how they're getting around that.
This BizPak review article tells you, Bouchard explains they're using jammers to bypass wireless security systems that rely on Wi-Fi.
So they're going full South Africa, where they have signal jamming backpacks that they wear that jam Wi-Fi, internet, and surveillance equipment to make their thievery go more smoothly.
This is happening all over the place.
In this story alone, they talk about, of course, as we just saw outside of Detroit, You also have West Whiteland Township in Pennsylvania.
The detective there saying they're taking advantage of coming into the U.S. and committing these crimes and being able to disappear to some degree.
We don't even know they exist, so how you're supposed to track them down doesn't make any sense.
He told the station he's seen at least three separate groups of criminal illegal alien thieves targeting his community as of late.
You also have in New Orleans, in Louisiana, in the city of Kenner, which is right next to New Orleans, the chief has already well documented the fact that illegals in the city of Kenner are basically recruiting the young juveniles that come into the country to basically become criminals.
And again, we'll show you a video on the other side of the former FBI leader.
Talking about this, and he mentions all of this, that they know things like, well, minors are basically never sent to jail.
We don't want to have the school-to-prison pipeline, so they actually recruit minors to do the...
Because even if they get caught, they're not going to go to jail, at least not for very long, and certainly not going to be deported.
In New York City, Venezuelan gang members on mopeds were snatching people's phones, using the financial information on them to rob their victims, and then sending the phones to South America to be wiped and sold.
You also have stories of criminal gangs from Florida going to New York, committing crimes, and then going to Florida to spend the money because they know that if they were to rob people in Florida, they would actually get arrested and deported, but in New York, they can get away with it.
This is a highly sophisticated criminal operation being facilitated by our own government.
So once again, whether it's the overwhelming gun violence and random violent crime happening in inner cities because Democrats decided police is racist or hearing gunshots is racist.
Or whether it's the open border policies of the Democrats that have allowed in criminal gangs that are now running roughshod and see America as basically an undefended cookie jar there for their exploitation and looting.
It's Democrat policy.
Or whether it's the open border allowing China or Iran to send agents across our border.
To wait for instructions.
We're allowing this to happen.
We're just simply allowing, facilitating, and encouraging this wholesale destruction of our sense of safety, of our freedom.
I mean, you can't be free if freedom means that people are going to be breaking into your house and stealing millions of dollars of jewelry.
You can't be free if going to a parade means you're going to get shot.
So either this continues unabated or we start living in a prison system.
We got some great videos to show you just ahead.
Some Fannie Willis clips coming out that will really destroy any remnant of hope you had for the future of this hellish nonsense we call daily life in America.
But let's continue.
Let's continue to talk about just the cancer that is Liberal leftist politics in this country.
Or rather, to stick with the, perhaps abuse the analogy, if crime and lawlessness, chaos, misery and violence, if this is the cancer that America is suffering through, the liberals and the leftists are the doctors that are injecting you with plutonium.
They're not curing the cancer.
They're accelerating it.
Now, if you kept going to a doctor for cancer treatments and every time you followed their prescription, the cancer got significantly worse, would you keep going to that doctor?
Why do Americans keep electing these people?
Why can they not see what's happening here?
And it's always because they've somehow been tricked.
I don't get it. I don't get what hypnotism is taking place.
I don't understand what mind control I'm somehow immune to, but my fellow Americans are subject to, to an overwhelming degree, that convinces people that it is somehow moral and good and that their sympathies are required to allow this to happen.
In other words, You can talk about the crime illegal immigrants cause.
You can talk about the overwhelming of resources that illegal immigrants cause.
You can talk about the fact that illegal immigrants by definition have violated the law to get here and should be expelled.
And they'll say to you, these are asylum seekers.
They're refugees.
To which the obvious response is, no, they're not.
They're just not.
I don't know why you think they are, but Hitler is not in charge of Mexico right now, okay?
There is no war going on south of our border.
These people are not fleeing from an oppressive government that's trying to kill them.
That's who these refugee asylum laws were made for.
Not these people.
Not the people coming across the border.
Just like it's not nice or beneficent or To get rid of technology that tries to identify gunshots because the places where the gunshot is is inhabited by black people.
So I don't know why they think they're being empathetic.
They think they're being good. They think we have some sort of moral obligation to accept gunshots.
Crime gangs and waves of criminals coming across the border and a system collapsing under the weight of this.
They think we have to experience that because I guess in their mind to not succumb to this, to not subject ourselves to this means that we are...
Like, like, field goal kicking babies across the border.
Like, it's poor, you know, yeah, maybe 100 people are criminals, but one of those people is somebody fleeing an abusive husband.
It's like, what are you talking about?
What is going on here? We don't have to, we don't have to, we don't have to give in to these people.
We don't have to, we don't owe these people anything.
We're not obligated to destroy our country in order to serve people that are lying about being asylum seekers.
Just like we don't have to destroy our country to serve people who are lying about crime rates being racist or police being racist.
This is utter and complete nonsense, and yet it goes on and on.
So we're going to go to clip number three now.
It's a bit of a longer clip, but I think the whole thing is important, and he mentions a lot of interesting topics in this.
It's the former FBI director.
But just before we do that, because this does have to do with Illegal immigration.
This story from the Gateway Pundit is from back in July of 2022, but it was reposted by Hernando Arce.
And it talks about the sheer amount of money being spent in one American city.
And when you understand that these people, because it's not their money, because it's your money, because it's tax money, they are using illegal immigration as an excuse to rob us by millions.
And by the way, the people that are doing this are providing services for Border Patrol and are providing the city with housing for illegal immigrants.
They're both massively overcharging for the services that they're doing and the people in the city are probably getting kickbacks.
There's probably some corruption going on where they go, oh yeah, let's rent a hotel room.
Usually renting a hotel room is $200 a night, but because it's illegal immigrants, we'll charge $2,000 a night, and then I'll get $100 of that.
It's just criminality on a massive scale.
The city of San Antonio sold the former city public service vacant customer service center on 7000 San Pedro Avenue for $5 million to KEM Texas Limited, controlled by Paul S. Covey and his son Kevin Covey.
Based on Kevin Covey's social media account, they're initially from Monterey, Mexico.
Okay, so they sold this building to some Mexicans who then agreed to lease it back to them to house people coming across the border from Mexico.
The lease terms are a base rent of $81,819 and an estimated additional rent for the common area of $31,000 per month.
San Antonio is paying $112,000 a month.
To house 700 illegal immigrants.
And they're paying it to a Mexican corporation who owns this company.
$112,000 a month.
All right. With that, let's go to clip number three, former FBI assistant director on Fox News.
unidentified
The New York Post reports agents arrested 41 members of Venezuela's most violent gang in the last fiscal year alone.
Law enforcement officials say they may be joining forces with the notorious MS-13 gang.
Chris Swecker is a former FBI assistant director.
He set up the first international task force to fight MS-13.
But if you take MS-13 and you add it to this train de Aragua, I hope I'm saying that correctly, although I don't think they deserve my respect in terms of pronunciation, But we need to know what could possibly be coming here.
And Venezuelans, they basically got the free pass to come into America from the Biden administration.
Yeah, we're in big trouble here.
I mean, these are two of the most dangerous gangs on the planet.
They are prison-spawn gangs.
They come out of the muck and the slime of these South American prisons, which are their stronghold.
They are on the lowest rung of the evolutionary ladder when it comes to organized crime.
That means they're all strictly street crime, which is dangerous.
They bring with them just mindless, knuckle-dragging violence they kill with knives and machetes.
MS-13 is well-established.
They're going to be the more dominant of the two gangs.
They've been here for quite a while.
And as you say, Dana, we knocked them down in the late 2000s with just an international effort.
But now they're coming back in and they're reestablishing themselves.
And that bodes ill for law enforcement across the country.
We're going to be living with this crime wave for decades.
And I believe that Venezuela is emptying their prisons deliberately and sending these people up here just like
Castro did in the 80s the Venezuelans encounter at the southern border totaling a
hundred and 44,000 that doesn't mean they're all gang members, of
course not but right we know in the United States that ms-13 has
10,000 gang members already here. What is their main issue?
Do they are they selling drugs? I know they terrorize people with violence
.
Bye.
Right. They are—you know, they're not like La Cosa Nostra, where they do more sophisticated crime like bid rigging or labor racketeering or the Russians that do ransomware and that type of crime.
These are strictly—they're relegated to the streets, so they're stealing cell phones, organized retail theft, robberies, prostitution, low-level street crime, but they will kill you over nothing.
Okay, so let me ask you, Chris, and this is speculation, so let me be clear about that.
But we had those police officers in Times Square breaking up what they thought was possibly a pickpocketing situation.
They were Venezuelan migrants.
These are the ones who escaped without having to pay bail and maybe got apprehended again.
There's only one who—and you remember the one who flipped everybody the double bird on his way out of court.
Could that possibly be a part of this, as you say, low-level crime?
Highly likely. One of their techniques is they use juveniles.
They like to use juveniles. One of those assailants, one of the main assailants, was 15 years old.
I can tell you, if they aren't card-carrying gang members, they are under the influence of card-carrying gang members.
And again, what they bring with them is a crime wave, essentially.
And we saw that happen in Miami in the 80s after Marielle Boatlift.
This will stay with us for quite a while.
And law enforcement better mount up and get on top of this because these are very dangerous.
harrison smith
Just problem after problem after problem created by the Democratic policies.
We need to get rid of these people politically.
And we'll be back on the other side to show you some clips from Fannie Willis.
Some humor. We'll inject some humor into this cascade of madness.
Because it is funny what she says.
She's very dumb. It is a frustrating series of cycles that we have to live through because people can't seem to mentally break out of this prison, this hypnosis prison they're all trapped in.
Whether it's the endless crime created by democratic policies or the fabricated international threats that are obviously designed to get us into wars that have nothing to do with us in reality.
And one of the most frustrating things about all of it is that all of it's funded and made possible by the relentlessly corrupt fiat currency system that we're in.
And that American people are struggling just to put food on their table.
We have a story about I think something like 80% of Americans can't even afford a one-bedroom apartment in an American city.
Our economy is collapsing.
Almost half of America's hourly workers cannot afford a one-bedroom apartment.
Almost half of Americans cannot afford a one-bedroom apartment.
60% of hourly workers earn less than they would need to afford a modest two-bedroom apartment, while millions upon millions of dollars are being spent To bring in people who will work for slave wages and crowd them out of the marketplace while simultaneously collecting more welfare than natives, Native Americans. And this is a global problem, obviously, because the central bank construction...
All works together to create this inevitability.
They're trying to deliberately eradicate the middle class to create a neo-feudal bifurcation where you have a very small amount of elite with essentially infinite imaginary money.
and 90% of the people will be a poverty level wage slaves.
And it's so frustrating, again, because all of it is predicated on the central banks creating money out of nothing.
So I want to go to this clip, clip number seven.
This is the head of the New Zealand Central Bank laughing at the sheer absurdity of their own industry.
Pay attention to this one.
unidentified
Let's watch. You know, the fiscal challenges, et cetera, that are there.
So very focused on being cost-effective.
We actually fund ourselves and then work out what dividend is needed to pay.
So it's a great business to be in central banking.
You print money and people believe it.
And touch wood.
And so it's a slightly different beast.
harrison smith
It's a great business to be in, central banking.
We print money out of nothing and people believe it.
Have you ever heard it expressed more callously?
It's a great business to be in, central banking.
We just fabricate money from nothing and people believe it.
That was a New Zealand central banker sort of giving the game away.
I want to go to that clip again just in case you don't believe your ears.
Let's hear it again. Clip number seven again.
New Zealand central banker really giving the game away.
unidentified
Let's watch. You know, the fiscal challenges, et cetera, that are there.
So very focused on being cost-effective.
We actually fund ourselves and then work out what dividend is needed to pay.
So it's a great business to be in central banking.
You print money and people believe it.
And touch wood.
People work day and night just to pay for basic necessities.
harrison smith
People can't afford homes.
Isn't it so funny that they believe that the money that we make up by pressing keys on a keyboard, isn't that hilarious?
unidentified
I want him found.
Not tomorrow, not after breakfast.
Now! Yes, sir!
Well... Well, what?
Man up and vanished like a fart in the wind.
Nothing left but...
Damn rocks on the windowsill.
And that cupcake on the wall.
What say there, Fuzzy Bridges?
This is conspiracy.
That's what this is.
One big damn conspiracy!
And everyone's in on it!
I'm not sure if I'm going to be able to do this.
Welcome to the war room.
harrison smith
You would have never escaped under my watch.
It's called being a proactive conspiracy theorist.
Always suspicious. Welcome back, folks.
Third hour of the war room is on.
Still a lot to cover here. We've got some interesting developments in Israel that I want to get into.
More and more of the Western establishment is...
Getting fed up with Israel and telling them to stop.
So we'll show you those clips in just a second.
A lot of other clips from, or a lot of other stories from around the world that I want to get into as well as the cage, the technocratic cage is being lowered over all of us.
But we're going to go to some clips here that have come out while I've been on air of old Fannie Willis.
The stories at InfoWars.com, Fannie pounded as Nathan Wade testifies to cash money reimbursements and former friend flushes her defense.
On Thursday, Special Prosecutor Nathan Wade testified under oath that he charged several lavish vacations with DA Fannie Willis to his corporate credit card while working on the Trump case and was later reimbursed in cash by Fannie.
The relationship between Wade and Willis is the subject of an evidentiary hearing as part of Willis' sprawling racketeering case brought against former President Donald Trump and 18 co-defendants for their alleged efforts to overturn, or correct, depending on who you are, the results of the 2020 election in Georgia.
Wade also testified that his marriage was irretrievably broken in 2015 and that his wife agreed to a divorce
But they held off because their children were still in school
But essentially the woman who is prosecuting Trump and the 18 other defendants is herself
hopelessly corrupt obviously politically motivated
untrustworthy and As you're about to see in these clips not qualified to run
a lemonade stand So let's let's just go down the list shall we?
We'll start with clip 22.
Willis has asked, you said you won't sleep with people who work under you.
Do you consider Mr. Wade working under you or not?
Let's go to clip 22 here.
unidentified
Anyone that worked for Fulton County.
I think I said an employee. Okay.
So that's the qualification you give an employee.
I think that's the statement that I made.
So if you want to quote me, quote me accurately.
So... It's your position because Mr.
Wade was not an employee? Or it's your position he wasn't an employee, correct?
Mr. Wade is not an employee and he will tell you that over and over again.
harrison smith
But he worked for you and you paid him?
unidentified
Yes, that's right.
Not an employee.
harrison smith
I'm going to revise this statement just so I make sure I accurately quote you.
unidentified
What you said was you won't sleep with people who work under you.
Do you not consider Mr. Wade working under you?
I consider Mr. Wade to be an agent.
An agent?
An agent that you pay to do things that you tell him to do.
And a pointee is what I really think of him as.
Your point, whatever merit it has, Ms. Merchant, is on the record.
Next question.
harrison smith
Don't you love when the corrupt criminals running your country also just like have to be condescending?
I don't know.
What's the opposite of humble?
I'd like to see some humility.
You got caught, lady.
How about some contrition?
How about you be a little bit contrite, a little bit humble?
Instead, it's like, if you're going to quote me, quote me accurately.
Okay. I'm a corrupt idiot.
That's what you said that, actually.
Or you should have. It's just, it's like, it's bad enough to be ruled by criminals, but when the criminals get caught and they're so confident and they're so condescending and obtuse, they're just like, okay, alright, Fanny, let's go to clip number 23 here.
If we can endure a few more clips of Fanny Willis being condescending and combative.
While being called out for a blatant and obvious corruption as she paid her lover with taxpayer money.
unidentified
Let's watch. So, okay.
harrison smith
So she did pay him in cash.
That's what we read here. There was cash that was paid to her, or to him, rather.
As it says, Wade testified under oath that he charged several lavish vacations with DA Fannie Willis to his corporate credit card while working on the Trump case and was later reimbursed in cash by Fannie.
She's like, nah, I use Cash App.
No, I Venmoed him, so that means it's not illegal.
I don't know what the difference is there other than, I guess, Cash App is more difficult to track.
I'm not really sure. Let's go to clip 24 here.
This is one of the clips getting quite a bit of play on Twitter and elsewhere.
Fannie Willis. Talking about money for her that was donated for her campaign to get the position that she's now in.
unidentified
Let's watch. My whole life, when I took out a large amount of money on my first campaign, I kept some of the cash of that.
Like, to tell you, I just have cash in my house.
I don't have as much to debt.
harrison smith
When I took out a large amount of money for my first campaign, I kept some of that cash.
Okay. You're not allowed to do that, though.
I don't think you're allowed to do that, though.
We can go to the next clip here.
Fannie Willis on whether she visited other continents with Nathan Wade.
Let's watch.
unidentified
He also said that he was a world traveler and been on many of the continents.
Have you been on any of those continents with him?
Besides this one.
Where's Belize? What continent is it?
I'm not being funny. I don't know.
I've been to Belize with him.
I've been to the Bahamas with him.
I've been with Farouba with him.
Don't embarrass me. I'm not sure what continents those are on.
Whatever continents those are, that's where I've been.
I'm sure if I gave it some thought, I would tell you.
But whatever continents those are, I've been to those locations, sir.
harrison smith
Yes, folks. This live scene from Idiocracy is playing out in a courtroom in Georgia as we speak.
What continent are we on right now?
unidentified
Okay. All right.
harrison smith
So, where is Belize, she asks.
I've been there. I've been to Aruba with him.
She's like, I'm not trying to be funny.
No, it's not funny, actually.
Nothing about this. Nobody thought you were trying to be funny.
No, we believe you. We believe that you don't know what continents you've been to.
Nobody here thought that was a joke.
But thanks for clarifying.
The least unnecessary clarification ever is when Fanny Willis says something dumb and
then clarifies she's not joking.
unidentified
Okay, alright, moving on here.
harrison smith
you Have you ever been to a different continent with him?
It's always been the same planet.
unidentified
We've always been on the same planet.
harrison smith
Alright, okay, let's go to clip 26.
Here she is accused of being a hostile witness.
Which she obviously is, but let's watch.
unidentified
...point where Ms. Willis should be treated hostilely...
I very much want to be here, so I'm not a hostile witness.
I very much want to be here.
Not so much that you're hostile, Ms. Willis, but be an adverse witness. Your interests are opposed to Ms. Merchants.
Ms. Merchants' interests are contrary to democracy, Your Honor, not to mine.
Are...
Okay, what?
harrison smith
So she is democracy.
If you oppose her, you oppose democracy.
In a way, she's right.
In a way, this is what you get with democracy.
In a way, this is what democracy is like.
She is, in many ways, an embodiment of democracy.
This woman is potentially taking down Donald Trump, the President of the United States.
This incompetent, corrupt, immoral, frankly, stupid person...
Was voted into office to have the power to potentially override the will of half of the population of America.
People that want to vote for Trump might not have a chance to because this woman has been given inordinate power that she abuses and is now pissed off and combative about being called out.
We got one final clip here.
I think it might be the same one unless she just elaborates on it.
And it's a repeat okay. So again, she gets confused.
They're like, no, you're an adverse...
You're giving adverse testimonial, meaning you're again...
She gets confused.
Maybe we will go to the clip again.
Because you can tell she's kind of...
She's kind of thrown off.
Because I have the feeling she doesn't understand the words being said.
They say, you're an adverse witness.
She's like, I'm not a hostile witness.
And they have to calmly explain that's not what adverse means.
It means you disagree with our client.
And her response to that is, if your client is opposed to me, she's opposed to democracy.
Let's watch this again, shall we?
Let's go to clip 27. Fulton DA, Fannie Willis, just claimed that if you oppose her, you oppose democracy.
unidentified
Let's watch. I very much want to be here, so I'm not a hostile witness.
I very much want to be here.
Not so much that you're hostile, Ms.
Willis, it'd be an adverse witness.
Your interests are opposed to Ms.
Merchant's. Thank you.
Ms. Merchant's interests are contrary to democracy, Your Honor, not to mine.
All right, let's proceed. We can keep things moving.
Ms. Murphy, next question. Okay, moving on.
harrison smith
We're just going to ignore that you just said you are democracy and just try to get back to the business of the crimes you committed, the money you stole.
The corruption you have in while in office.
Incredible stuff, folks.
Not credible. By definition, not credible.
These people are not credible.
unidentified
I don't even know what to say.
harrison smith
You're confused, Willis told Ashley Merchant, an attorney for one of Trump's co-defendants, repeatedly accusing her of lying in court documents.
You think I'm on trial?
These people are on trial for trying to steal an election in 2020.
I'm not on trial, no matter how hard you try to put me on trial.
She said this while on trial.
It was an extraordinary sight during an acrimonious day-long hearing.
The top prosecutor in a historic case against a former president for efforts to subvert the 2020 presidential election was the one on the witness stand, parrying deeply invasive questions about her personal life.
Her gamble was even more remarkable because the judge in the case, Scott McAfee, may not have required it at all.
Willis had initially objected to efforts to compel her testimony and had urged McAfee to scuttle a subpoena, but as one of her deputies was objecting Thursday to her being forced to testify, Willis entered the courtroom and said she wanted to take the stand.
Okay, so here we've established a pattern of poor decision making.
Willis' testimony careened between indignantly defending her prosecution of Trump and his many allies, accusing her adversaries of working contrary to democracy, and sharing deeply personal, sometimes unsolicited details about her relationship history, her regular use of cash for major expenses, and her vacations. Willis talked about how she did 50 big, a reference to her significant travels in 2021, the year she turned 50.
She also talked about her preference for Grey Goose vodka over wine and her father's lifelong urging that she stash thousands of dollars in cash at her home at all times.
Willis described reimbursing Wade in cash for some of their travel dispenses.
I don't do my friends like that, she said.
If you tell me it's a G, then you're going to get $1,000 back.
So... So I think she's right.
I think... I think she represents democracy.
I think she is democracy embodied.
This is what we get when you have a democracy in which the majority of the population are like her.
Stupid. Just not very smart, I think.
Just incredible. Again, the story is that Infowars...
Fanny pounded.
Fanny pounded as Nathan Wade testifies to cash money reimbursements.
And I believe there's a newer one up as well with some of these clips.
Just go to Infowars.com to find those.
So we're going to move on, I guess.
unidentified
It's just... It's just pathetic.
harrison smith
This whole country is just so pathetic.
Breaking Fannie C. Willis' cash payments to her lover exposed during Trump case in Atlanta.
So I guess that broke during the Alex Jones show.
Alright, yeah, we're going to move on now.
Because good lord. I just don't even know what to say.
It literally is idiocracy.
Straight up idiocracy.
Where I guarantee you There are people watching this that are just like, you get them, girl.
You get your vacations on the taxpayer dime.
You get that president.
They don't care. They don't care.
That's one of the things I was arguing with.
I wasn't even arguing. I was having a conversation with a woman over the weekend.
I've talked about it a little bit on American Journal.
She... Literally said to me that she is a lifelong conservative.
She actually was a volunteer for the Bush campaign at one point.
She told me she would vote for Joe Biden even if he was in a coma.
She did not care that he was mentally incompetent.
So it's not like these people don't know.
It's not like we have information where it's like, hey guys, the...
Special prosecutors said Joe Biden is so stupid and incompetent and brain dead that he can't be charged with the crimes that he committed.
He said he committed crimes and then said he's too brain dead to be charged with them.
It's not like they don't know that.
They don't care.
They really don't care.
And when it came to all of Donald Trump's trials, she didn't care about them.
In particular, she just wanted Trump gone.
Just like all these people.
Trump isn't some criminal that they finally caught up with, right?
This isn't some guy who's just a mafia boss that they're trying to track down.
He's too slick for them.
They're making things up to charge him with.
The trial in Manhattan over the hush payment.
Utterly absurd.
It's utterly and completely absurd.
What is this? In 2020, Fannie Willis is asked why the people of Fulton County should support her for district attorney.
Quote, because they deserve a DA that won't have sex with his employees because they deserve a DA that won't put money in their own pocket.
Yeah, she's democracy embodied.
First criminal trial is set for March.
That's the New York trial.
It's hard to keep up with all these various and equally baseless trials.
Far-left NYC judge dismisses Trump request to toss ridiculous NYC case trial scheduled for March 25th.
Far-left judge Juan Murchin ruled that Trump's trial in the Stormy Daniels Hush Money case brought by Alvin Bragg will begin March 25th.
Now, you know, Alvin Bragg had to do some legal manipulation...
In order to charge Trump with 34 felony counts.
Now, simultaneously, Alvin Bragg downgraded over half of the felony charges in the city of New York to misdemeanors because he's pro-crime.
Again, this hasn't...
I don't think I need to explain to you, but it has nothing to do with Trump being a criminal.
It has nothing to do with...
Yeah, okay, there you go. JoJo Jers, exactly, right?
Fanny Willis has had enough of this.
She's laying down the law.
It's like straight up idiocracy.
You can be wrong. You can be a criminal.
You can be corrupt. It can all be proven.
They can have unending evidence.
But if you just put on this act like you're the aggrieved party, people will just believe you.
And they know. They know.
They know this woman's corrupt. They don't care.
If they want to get Trump, they think she's going to get Trump.
So they don't care. She could steal all the money in the world.
You want to talk about she could shoot somebody in the head on Fifth Avenue.
And still the leftist would support her.
That's how it is in this country at this point.
In addition to Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis paying her lover, Nathan Wade, nearly $700,000 of taxpayer funds.
Fannie also spread the money from Fulton County coffers to Terrence Ahmed Bradley, who is Nathan's divorce attorney slash tenant.
So basically, while Fannie was having an affair with a married man, she used $75,000 of Fulton County taxpayer money to pay for her lover's divorce lawyer's fees.
Yeah, but she acts indignant and condescending.
So, you go, girl.
So she's obviously right.
We might need to bring in the clip from Idiocracy where...
It's like the lawyer says something stupid, but he says it, like, as if he's right, and everybody in the courtroom's like, ooh, whoa, whoa.
We've entered an era of war.
D.A. Fanny gets it. This is how you slay dragons.
This is how you slay dragons.
She's a criminal. What are you talking about?
unidentified
I don't know, man.
harrison smith
I don't know anymore. I really don't.
Because, again, you talk to these people.
Even, like, seemingly intelligent, you know, boomers.
Fanny Willis, don't take no mess.
She came to play and she came to slay.
unidentified
Don't mess with Fanny Willis.
harrison smith
And there's an animated gif of Fanny Willis right there.
Again, these people don't care.
They don't care. They don't care.
They don't care. If you talk to these people, you're like, okay, so what do you think Trump is guilty of?
They're like, what isn't he guilty of?
Whatever. He's guilty of everything.
Just charge him. It doesn't matter.
They don't know the details.
They don't care. Even if they knew that the charges are ridiculous and nonsensical, they don't care.
They don't care. They don't care.
They don't care. They want Trump gone because they're psychological slaves of a system that opposes Trump.
34 felony counts he'll be charged with or he'll be on trial for in March from Hush Money Payments he made to Stormy Daniels.
It's all very weird because it's not illegal to have sex with a porn star.
That's not illegal. It's not illegal to pay for the porn star to keep quiet.
See, it would be different if, like, Trump did something bad and criminal and then paid to hush it up as part of a criminal conspiracy to avoid charges.
There are no charges for having sex with a porn star.
That doesn't exist. If anything, he was a victim of blackmail.
Stormy Daniels thought that the story would be negative to his campaign and demanded money not to tell it, and so he paid her.
So he's essentially being charged with 34 felony crimes for paying a blackmailer, for paying an extortionist to cover up something that's not a crime.
Oof. Oof.
Well, if you had hope for America...
That probably killed the last bit of it.
Not just what Fannie Willis says, but then the number of voters and people out there that are fine with it.
All right, welcome back, folks. There's even more clips from Fannie Willis, but we're not even going to go to them.
But it is funny.
It's funny because she just...
Everybody's just kind of baffled.
Everybody's just, like, confused at what she's saying.
I don't know what they asked her, but she goes, I'm not going to emasculate a black man.
And they're like, what?
She's like, I'm not going to emasculate a black man.
Do you understand that?
And they're just like, okay.
Moving on. People running the court are just like, she's just saying stuff.
And they're just like, okay.
We're not sure what that means, but we're going to keep going with the questioning.
Okay. But nah, she's a strong black woman.
I'm not going to emasculate a black man.
Okay. Again, it's just like these people.
My god, these people just, it's like...
Okay, it works.
The craziest thing is it works.
That really is the most messed up part about all of it.
This type of stuff works.
I guess it should be expected.
I don't know. I just don't know anymore.
How just everything, everything, everything, everything.
It's one of the cycles that we deal with continuously is Democrats, primarily, just being busted, just being so...
Destroyed by evidence.
And then nothing happens.
People on Twitter saying, you know, this woman's definitely going to be disbarged.
She's definitely going to be taken off the case.
This is a disaster for her.
But she should be, you know, criminally charged.
Obviously, she spent $700,000 of taxpayer money on her beau.
On her masculine black man.
She'll never get charged. She'll never go to jail for this, right?
It probably won't even be a speed bump in the attempt to destroy Donald Trump.
Whether it's Joe Biden or the entire Russia collusion hoax and all of the people with their text messages just laying out clear as day what happened or the latest with the evidence that they used five eyes to circumvent constitutional restrictions.
They planted agents to then claim Trump was meeting with foreigners and justify FISA warrants.
I mean, we have so much evidence about all of this.
All of it, all of it, all of it, all of it.
Nothing ever happens. That's probably the most frustrating cycle because you think you have this idea that America, there's still some remnant of honor or shame or something in this country where when criminals are caught, they're going to be punished.
When it's so egregious, just if nothing more than the sake of the dignity of this country, something has to happen to them.
And yet time and time and time again, they just flaunt the rules right in front of us.
That's maybe the hardest thing because, again, you think, like, if we could just prove this, we have the suspicion of what's going on, but if we could get solid proof, then that would change things.
You get the solid proof.
They acknowledge the solid proof.
They come out and give statements where they say, yes, Joe Biden did commit a crime.
Yes, he did have classified documents.
Yes, he did know about them.
And no, we're not going to charge him.
And you just go, okay, well then what the hell?
What do we have to do here? What do we have to do to get justice?
Because it goes on and on and on.
Every single day is the same.
This story from The Federalist.
I wanted to bring it up because it's a good article, but it says, Did our intel agencies suggest the Russia hoax to Hillary?
So this takes the explosive news from Tuesday that long before the FBI launched Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, the U.S. intelligence community had asked foreign intel agencies to surveil 26 people connected to Donald Trump.
It raises the questions of whether our intelligence community colluded with the Clinton campaign in these efforts.
He puts it Nicely, whatever.
This is a good article. But it's a stupid question.
Of course, of course the intel agencies puppeteered this entire situation.
And when it says, did our intel agencies suggest the Russian hoax to Hillary?
I've tried to explain this before.
Hillary Clinton is a CIA asset.
Bill Clinton is a CIA asset.
They have been in the CIA since before he was governor of Arkansas.
That's why he was made governor of Arkansas.
That's why you had the Mina affair and the drug running through Arkansas because the governor at the time was a CIA agent who was in on it.
So, you know, there's always these questions of like, Hillary Clinton kill list.
It's like the CIA isn't killing people on behalf of Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Clinton is a CIA agent.
They're killing people on behalf of themselves.
So it's not like these are two different things.
And it dates back to their time in Arkansas.
They were recruited by the CIA. They were identified as people with the potential to have political power.
So when they were put into office in Arkansas and then in the White House, they were agents of the intelligence community.
So this shouldn't be that hard to figure out.
So yes, of course, the intel agencies were responsible for all of that from the very beginning.
Then you have Biden, of course, just like Hillary Clinton.
Almost exactly the same, only in this case they didn't actually do a press conference.
Just the report saying that Biden was in fact guilty and no, he wouldn't be charged, just like you had the head of the FBI before the 2016 campaign coming out and saying, here are all the crimes Hillary Clinton's guilty of, but she will not be charged.
Good night. Time and time again.
It just happens over and over again.
This twist in the...
Her case, Robert Herr, special counsel, they came out and said Biden is a retard and can't remember anything, so we can't charge him with the crimes that he definitely committed.
You know, when Joe Biden came out and said, how dare he talk about my son Beau, my poor son Beau, who died in Iraq, how dare he bring that up?
And my response was like, Old man, you bring him up every chance you get.
You bring him up the most inappropriate times ever.
You bring him up and lie about his death when you're supposed to be comforting families who have had family members die because you sent them into Afghanistan and then didn't give them a ride home.
Like, So the idea that Biden would be outraged that he brought up Beau.
Biden brings up Beau all the time.
It's a shield for him.
In the most cynical and despicable way, he uses his dead son to stop people from asking him questions.
And that turned out is exactly what happened with Robert Herr.
So I hit the nail on the head on this one.
President Joe Biden lashed out at Robert Herr last week over one particular line in the special counsel's report of his handling of classified information that Biden, quote, did not remember even within several years when his son Bo died.
How in the hell dare he raise that?
Biden told reporters in an impromptu White House press conference that descended into
just the most embarrassing thing Biden has ever been a part of.
He says, frankly, when I was asked that question, I thought to myself, it isn't any of their
damn business.
Well, it turns out her never actually asked that question.
According to two people familiar with hers five hour interview with the president over
two days last October, it was the president, not her or his team who first introduced Bo
Biden's death, they said.
So again, I said that.
I just pat myself on the back here.
I said that the day after it happened.
When he said, how dare you bring it up?
My first response was, he brought it up.
He always brings it up. Was he trying to act outraged at people bringing up the thing that he brings up all the time?
It turns out he was the one that brought it up to Robert Herr.
So I'm sure it was some question about him being a criminal.
And his response was like, but my son Bo died.
But my poor son Bowie died.
And they're like, what year? And he's like, ah, crap.
I don't know. Well, was he killed in Iraq or did he die of cancer?
Ah, he got me again. Sir, if you would please stop sniffing the child.
We're trying to do an interview here.
He's just awful. It's all so terrible.
Folks, I've done just an abysmal job today of asking you to go to Infowarsstore.com, which is stupid of me because we won't be here if you don't.
Please go to Infowarsstore.com.
Incredible products. Products that you need.
Products that you probably buy anyway.
Why not buy them with us? And if you're worried about Russian space weapons or Chinese infiltration and EMPs going off, just know that you yourself can be prepared for any eventuality with preparedness...
products at infowarsstore.com.
Go there, check them out. Storable food, incredible supplements, keeps us on the air.
It's a win-win, win-win, win-win.
It's a 540 win, a 1080 win.
All right, folks, welcome back. Today's not going to be over for me once the show is over.
We're actually filming, we're gonna film a new pitch meeting skit after the show today.
But honestly it's It's it's kind of insane how hard we work at in full wars
I'm gonna go to sleep.
This is not, you know, just a clock-in, clock-out sort of job.
Everyone here is, by necessity, dedicated to the mission in which we are engaged.
And that includes the entire crew.
It includes, of course, all the great content creators we have at Band.Video.
And, of course, it includes the hosts as well.
If you're watching the Alex Jones show today, you know, he came on and talked about the bankruptcies going through and having to sell basically everything he owns in order to keep this operation going.
And all that we ask in return is that you go to infowarsstore.com and just buy things that you would buy anyway or that you should buy anyway.
If you buy energy drinks, why not try Turbo Force Plus?
It's 40% off.
You know, you're not getting 30 grams of sugar or whatever is in your typical energy drink.
It's better for you. It's better energy.
It's more high-quality energy.
It's not like this frenetic kind of like, you know, big energy and then a crash.
It's more smooth, long-lasting.
TurboForce Plus is a fantastic product, so you can actually save money.
Instead of getting energy drinks every day, go get TurboForce.
Nitric Boost is an incredible supplement with an endless array of positive effects with the vasodilation that comes along with it.
Winter Sun Plus is, of course, our D supplement, vitamin D3. That's 40% off as well and more necessary now than any other time in the year because this is a time when people get sick and Vitamin D boosts your immune system.
Bodies is also back in stock and 40% off, a fantastic product.
Your all-in-one solution for flexibility, mobility, and immune support.
And even if you just, like, if you buy vitamins at the store, why not just buy them at InfoWars?
They're better quality, they'll probably be cheaper, and your money will be going towards InfoWars and this drive for human freedom against a technocratic system.
Uber elite. Why not go to InfoWars?
Even if you aren't into supplements, you don't think you need bodies or whatever, you should probably still be taking a multivitamin.
You should still be taking something, because after all, and while I'm on it, because I'm going to get to the Israeli news in just a second, but this came out today.
I want to get the exact numbers right here.
But, you know, M4 has been telling you for decades that there's poison in the food and water.
80% of Americans test positive for chemical found in Cheerios, Quaker Oats, that may cause infertility and delayed puberty.
Four out of five Americans are being exposed to little-known chemicals found in popular oat-based foods, including Cheerios and Quaker Oats, that's linked to reduced fertility, altered fetal growth, and delayed puberty.
Staggering 80% of Americans tested positive for this harmful pesticide called chlormaquat.
The highly toxic agricultural chemical is federally allowed to be used on oats and other grains imported to the U.S. when applied to oat and grain crops.
Chlormaquat alters the plant's growth, preventing it from bending and thus making it easier to harvest.
But it's also poison for humans.
So look. Food's poison.
The water's poison. And even if it's not poisoned, it's being grown in soil that's been depleted of nutrients.
You have to be supplementing.
You have to be making up for the fact that our food is not healthy anymore.
So you should be supplementing, and InfoWars gives you a very, very easy way to do it and keep us on the air at the same time.
InfoWarsStore.com. Please do go there and support us.
We will not be here without you.
And we plan on being here for as long as humanly possible.
But just another little, just another little data point in the continuous poisoning of Americans in every possible way.
But let's get into what's happening in Israel because it seems like after months and months of relentless indiscriminate
targeting against the people of Gaza, killing hundreds of people a day, tens of thousands of
innocent civilians dead.
a massacre beyond human understanding that will go down in history as one of the most horrific
time periods ever. People aren't going to ask anymore, when the Nazis were killing all the
Jews, how did people let that happen? It's like, well, look around you. We're seeing
the Jews, ironically, in this situation. Israel, bomb hospitals and universities and refugee camps
Every day there's There's the most horrific images of bodies shredded by these bombs, babies orphaned, just horror beyond horror.
And it never ends.
And until now, there hasn't even been very much pushback.
that's going to be a big problem. But finally, it seems
as though. They're going too far. At this point, you have
David Cameron from the UK saying you've got to stop.
What's happening? You've got Biden. Stories about him
calling out Netanyahu and being frustrated that We have
no leverage over. This tiny country in the Middle East that
we have no leverage over. We have leverage over. We have
leverage over them, but we don't apparently. Finally it
seems like they're pushing too far from info wars. Canada,
Australia, New Zealand urge Israel to Nick's plans for
Rafa ground offensive. The prime ministers of these three
countries issued a joint statement saying we are gravely
concerned by indications that Israel is planning a ground
offensive into Rafa. A military operation into Rafa would be
catastrophic. We urge the Israeli government not to go
Israeli special forces enter largest remaining functioning hospital in Gaza.
Israeli Special Forces raided Nasser Hospital in Gaza, the largest functioning hospital in the enclave, after laying siege to the facility for several days.
Israeli forces shelled the hospital early Thursday, killing and injuring an undetermined
number of people, according to Doctors Without Borders, who at least one of their colleagues
is missing since the attack.
Israeli military bulldozers dug up the mass graves inside the complex walls, said Dr.
Al-Khedra, spokesperson for the Ministry of Health.
On Thursday, the forces stormed the maternity building and conducted a search operation
inside.
The raid comes after hundreds of civilians were forced by Israeli forces to leave the
hospital, which they had been using as a shelter.
Those people were forced to leave the safe confines of the hospital.
People that tried to run were sniped down.
At least eight people trying to flee the hospital were killed by gunfire.
Just, again, horror beyond belief, evil beyond description.
Hard to even understand this happening in the modern day where we have access to all this information in real time, and yet it continues.
And of course, in response to global outrage at what they're doing, they are driving ahead regardless.
Rafa was supposed to offer refuge.
Now it waits for possible Israeli attack.
They say, will Israel execute a major incursion into Rafah on the southern tip of Gaza Strip, or will Hamas and Israel agree to a ceasefire instead?
The answer is, of course, Israel will do a raid.
As of Wednesday, roughly 1.4 million Palestinians sheltering in cramped conditions in Rafah were bracing for the potential of an Israeli assault on the city, but hoping for a diplomatic breakthrough as negotiators from the U.S., Israel, Egypt, and Qatar were said to be meeting in Cairo for a plan to pause the fighting.
Israel vows action against Hamas and Rafa amid global calls for restraint.
The Israeli leader Netanyahu, who's under growing international pressure to hold off on the planned assault, gave no indications as to when the offensive might take place or where the hundreds of thousands of people now crammed into Rafa might go.
It's actually millions, 1.5 million.
And basically they've said, we're not negotiating with Hamas.
We will be raiding Rafa regardless of what everybody wants.
U.S. is probing Israel strikes that killed civilians in Gaza, as well as the possible use of white phosphorus in Lebanon.
The investigation could result in new conditions being set for the delivery of U.S. weapons to Israel.
It's not going to, though. I mean, it just goes on and on.
Hezbollah fires rockets at northern Israel for reprisal for deadly day.
Israel strikes killed 10 in Lebanon, including a mother and daughter.
Israel said it hit back after rocket fire killed a soldier.
Because, of course, Hezbollah is careful to only target military installations while Israel responds by murdering civilians with impunity.
And a strange twist to the whole Middle East situation.
Iran has declared ownership of Antarctica and plans to build a military base on the South Pole.
So that's just a bizarre twist to all of this.
But, again, it's yet another cycle, a daily cycle in this case, of Israel committing the most horrific war crimes you've ever seen.
Some people feigning outrage, and then we send them $14 billion so they can continue even further.
People fleeing hospitals for refugee camps, then those refugee camps being bombed.
Tent cities being bombed with claims that they're hiding Hamas in the basements of the tents.
I mean this is how ridiculous it is.
So it goes on, it continues, outrage is pouring in from Western leaders who finally seem to have gotten their fill
of the massacres, the genocide taking place.
And yet their outrage and objections fall on deaf ears as Israel continues what it started out doing in October,
the ethnic cleansing and genocide of the Palestinian people in Gaza so they can annex it into Israel in a blatant
policy of annexation.
And they're just conquering it.
They're just doing it and we could stop it at any point but unfortunately our government has a lot of Israeli sympathizers.
Is that a way I can put it? Thanks for being here with us folks.
You say classy info warriors.
alex jones
I'll see you back here tomorrow. Anybody that's paid attention to Infowars and what we do knows we're at the center of the zeitgeist.
We literally beat ourselves to death to be as accurate as we can, unlike the corporate-controlled dinosaur media that lies on purpose.
While they're lying to you about today's news, we're telling you the truth about what's coming next.
So I am fully focused.
I'm being as accurate and researched and truthful as I can and letting the chips fall as they may.
So when I bring you a product, and all our products are incredible, and I tell you it's game-changing, and quite frankly, you should be careful.
You can take it to the bank.
I want you.
Particularly those on the fence that have never gotten a product at InfoWarsStore.com to go to InfoWarsStore.com and I want you to get foundational energy.
You can take X2, the cleanest iodine out there, goes right in your cells, takes two weeks to kick in on average, and then you're sold.
And it's great. And it's the same level as this with cellular function.
But this is the missing link.
This is the breakdown product.
Most people's cells have problems doing it.
Some people have major problems doing it.
But methylfolate is the breakdown of folic acid.
And then you give it B-Complex that's organic.
It supercharges it like nitrous oxide in a funny car or a drag racer.
So this is already all the rage.
You don't have to sell your methyl... But this has the B-Complex.
It's the highest quality and it funds the Infowar.
So you can buy methylfolate somewhere else and it's great.
But this funds the Infowar so it's a 360 win.
Get your foundational energy and experience it and be careful.
Only take one at first. I took one today.
I'm climbing the walls for the last 10 hours.
I'm shooting this ad at night.
I mean, it's not a stimulant, folks.
It's cellular energy.
You add stuff like TurboForce or X2 or stuff to this, it's crazy.
Export Selection