Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Well, as we predicted, Donald Trump wins a simple majority last night in New Hampshire despite Nikki Haley outspending him probably at least four to one. | ||
| Despite the Haley campaign working with Obama aides in an attempt to get as many Democrats to vote for Haley as possible. | ||
| So we are going to dig into that today. | ||
| And yet somehow Haley says, well, this just means I need to go on. | ||
| This just says I've got a chance. | ||
| But then realistic people, of course, are saying the exact opposite. | ||
| I think Vivek Ramaswamy, though, had it right from the beginning, though, didn't he? | ||
| He said that the establishment's goal is to get it down to Trump and Haley and then just remove Trump from the equation and then it's just Haley. | ||
| And that's why he was sticking in the race despite, at the time, pulling at about 10%. | ||
| He said, well, look, I got to stay in and it's going to be Haley. | ||
| Well, now, maybe he was right. | ||
| Why won't Haley just go away? | ||
| She's the deep state pick on the Republican side. | ||
| So we're going to dig into the results from last night. | ||
| It was a big victory for Donald Trump. | ||
| The numbers were huge. You've also got some developments. | ||
| I think that Fannie Willis might have just made a major mistake. | ||
| She should have just shut up. | ||
| With her little lover there. | ||
| Her little prosecutor lover there. | ||
| She should have just shut up. But now she opened her big fat mouth and has angered the wife of her lover even more. | ||
| So if there was a chance to maybe buy her off or shut her up, Fannie Willis might have blown it. | ||
| So we're going to talk about that. We have a statement today from Governor Greg Abbott responding to the Biden administration's human trafficking operation, border invasion going on right now. | ||
| And look, I'm still frustrated. | ||
| I don't know how many illegal immigrants are actually going to be stopped with everything Abbott is doing, but he is, without a doubt, forcing the narrative war to happen. | ||
| He is, without a doubt, forcing the issue to come up. | ||
| To me, it's more of a deterrent or maybe a detour that the illegal immigrants are going to have to go in as far as what Abbott is doing. | ||
| I still think they're coming across. | ||
| But a real scathing statement today, probably the strongest thing Abbott has done. | ||
| If you were to make a grade on efficiency and effectiveness, his statement today is probably actually the most efficient and the most effective. | ||
| So we're going to read that for you. | ||
| We also have a statement from Carrie Lake in regards to the leaked audio that we played. | ||
| It was hard to believe it was even real. | ||
| By the way, barely any mainstream news coverage last night. | ||
| Maybe I'll give them a pass since it was a primary result night. | ||
| So maybe I'll give them the pass for not covering it last night and it barely being a news story today. | ||
| Now, the independent press, the true American press, not the fake news, not the bought and paid for press, they're covering it. | ||
| They're making a big deal of it. | ||
| Enough so that Carrie Lake is going to be issuing a response, a comment tonight on it. | ||
| And she's going to be doing so on Rumble.com. | ||
| So, good for Rumble. | ||
| By the way, there was more good news for Rumble, too. | ||
| They just signed an exclusive deal with Barstool Sports. | ||
| I'm not really in the stock market, but when Rumble went public, I actually thought about buying stock in Rumble because I knew it was going to do great. | ||
| I'm sure that's great for their shareholders. | ||
| And then the statement from the chairman, Jeff DeWitt, who was caught on tape, I mean, I guess call it a bribe. | ||
| I guess call it buying off. | ||
| I mean, it's clear corruption. | ||
| He issues a statement and a resignation, but it's weak. | ||
| And I'm glad he issued it before Carrie Lake makes her statement tonight because now she's also going to have to respond to what he said. | ||
| And she already has issued a brief statement on it, basically calling it nonsense. | ||
| So here we are. It's the InfoWars War Room on this Wednesday, January 24th. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We'll be right back. There is a man who is whatever America needs him to be. | |
| Not the hero we deserve, but the hero we need. | ||
| Nothing less than a knight. | ||
| Shining. They'll hunt him. | ||
| They'll set the dogs on him. | ||
| Because the truth is the greatest threat they face. | ||
| It's the war room. | ||
| With Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Live on this Wednesday, January 24th, 2024. | ||
| The fastest three hours on the internet is live. | ||
| The Infowars War Room. | ||
| Election headquarters brought to you by Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And we are going to get into the results from last night's primary. | ||
| Donald Trump with another victory. | ||
| A big victory. | ||
| Now it's a little weighted down. | ||
| Because Nikki Haley had outspent Trump 4 to 1, at least, that we know of. | ||
| The numbers we have say Trump spent $10 million in New Hampshire and Haley spent $30 million. | ||
| And then there was another $30 million spent that was basically listed as unknown or miscellaneous. | ||
| My guess is all that went to Haley. | ||
| But upwards of $50 million spent in New Hampshire. | ||
| For an election that everybody knew Trump was going to win. | ||
| He gets the simple majority. | ||
| And this is with Nikki Haley getting the Democrat votes. | ||
| This is with Nikki Haley and Obama advisors telling Democrats to get out and vote for Haley since it's an open primary. | ||
| And she still couldn't defeat Donald Trump. | ||
| And we have proof of that, by the way, with some of the exit polls. | ||
| Where they come out and they say, yeah, I'm a Democrat. | ||
| I just came here to vote for Haley once Trump's out of the way, we're voting Biden. | ||
| As if we didn't know that wasn't what was happening already. | ||
| Now it's just totally confirmed with the exit polls. | ||
| But guys, while I'm going through these headlines, do me a favor. | ||
| Will you guys pull up the... | ||
| It would probably be better to pull up the 2016 New Hampshire primary results... | ||
| And then pull up the New Hampshire primary results from last night. | ||
| And let's just see the totals. | ||
| Let's see what boost Trump got from 2016 to 2024. | ||
| And let's pull up the primary numbers there. | ||
| And let me know when we have these. | ||
| I'm gonna go through these headlines right now. | ||
| CNN exit poll. | ||
| 70% of Nikki Haley voters not registered Republicans. | ||
| Now... Plenty of Americans who aren't registered Republicans vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| I was not a registered Republican when I voted for Donald Trump in the 2016 primary and election. | ||
| I became a registered Republican because I was running for—I tried to become a precinct chair here in Austin, and the Republican establishment kicked me out of their events. | ||
| But that's a story from four years ago. | ||
| If you're following then, you probably saw it. | ||
| You remember it. It was kind of funny. Yeah, the Republican Party kicked me out of their events because I tried to become a precinct chair, even though I had support from within. | ||
| But that's just the Republican establishment swamping it up. | ||
| So, the real number is that it was about 40% of Democrats that voted for Haley. | ||
| So about half the votes for Haley last night were Democrats, and they were just anti-Trump votes to get Trump out of the way, who will then be voting Biden in the election. | ||
| And we know this from exit polls. | ||
| In fact, here's one individual who admitted this exact thing in clip four. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a vote against Trump. | |
| I think it would be better to have her against Biden in the elections than it would be Trump in her. | ||
| Do you consider yourself generally independent, Republican or Democrat? | ||
| Democrat. So when you undeclared, you voted for Nikki Haley. | ||
| If it was Nikki Haley against Joe Biden in the general election, who are you voting for? | ||
| Joe Biden. So that was about half of the Haley voters from last night. | ||
| So even these numbers we'll go over here shortly are skewed. | ||
| And we have to realize that about half of Haley's votes last night were Democrat votes that were against Trump. | ||
| But that was their strategy. That was their big strategy. | ||
| It was an Obama advisor's idea. | ||
| He promoted it. The Democrats were pushing the vote for Haley. | ||
| Biden was pushing the vote for Haley. | ||
| And they still couldn't do it. | ||
| They still couldn't get that bird-nosed freak to beat Donald Trump. | ||
| New Hampshire ad spending, top $77 million as Haley and Trump fight to the finish. | ||
| Now again, this is a CNN article and they break it down. | ||
| And they're claiming that the Trump team spent $10 million. | ||
| 10 million was Trump, and then 30 million was Haley. | ||
| So that's about another 30-40 million that they say was, oh, just miscellaneous other groups, which was all probably spent on Haley or anti-Trump. | ||
| So really, Haley outspent Trump 4-1, 5-1, couldn't win. | ||
| She had Democrats voting for her. | ||
| Couldn't win. And so that's why ABC News has the headline today. | ||
| If Haley couldn't win New Hampshire, she probably won't win anywhere. | ||
| She probably won't win anywhere. | ||
| The former UN ambassador, Nikki Haley. | ||
| It was supposed to be her big breakout. | ||
| And it was the big breakdown. | ||
| Now talk about reverse reality. | ||
| Now Haley is completely engaging in it. | ||
| I guess the beauty of this, this audience, this crew, we knew Nikki Haley was a swamp creature day one. | ||
| A UN ambassador, a war hawk, a warmonger. | ||
| We knew she was a swamp creature day one. | ||
| But now, many people who thought, oh, you know, Nikki Haley's not so bad. | ||
| Well, now they're learning she's a swamp creature. | ||
| She engages in the reverse reality. | ||
| She claims, Nikki Haley says, it's not the party, it's the political elite supporting Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who buys that? | |
| Who believes that garbage? | ||
| It's the political elite supporting Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's the political elite that hate Donald Trump. | |
| It's the Republican establishment that's supporting Donald Trump. | ||
| It's the Republican establishment that's been trying to get rid of Donald Trump since 2015 that you're a part of. | ||
| So now Nikki Haley is... | ||
| I mean, she's basically just a Democrat now. | ||
| At this point, she's just a Democrat. | ||
| She is now the quintessential rhino. | ||
| Nikki Haley is a Democrat. | ||
| She gets Democrat votes, and she talks like a Democrat, and she treats her constituents like a Democrat. | ||
| But she's not done. | ||
| Really, will she lose every single primary and just stick it out to the end hoping Trump gets arrested and then say, ha ha, I beat Trump! | ||
| See, I told you it was the political elite that support Donald Trump as they cuff him and throw him into jail. | ||
| See, I beat Donald Trump! | ||
| As the corrupt establishment erases him from the equation. | ||
| That's her plan. Wall Street Journal. | ||
| Nikki Haley earns the chance to fight on after New Hampshire. | ||
| She earned the chance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
She earned the chance. | |
| By losing again. | ||
| And New Hampshire was her best shot and everybody knows it. | ||
| Everybody knows it. | ||
| That New Hampshire was her best shot. | ||
| Vivek Ramaswamy... | ||
| Here are direct quotes from the Wall Street Journal editorial board tonight. | ||
| It's all hiding in plain sight. | ||
| Here are the poll quotes. If she can remain competitive, she's not. | ||
| There's an argument for Ms. | ||
| Haley. Is it Ms. | ||
| or Mrs.? Or didn't she have the affair? | ||
| I don't know. Ms. | ||
| Haley to stay in the race through the July convention. | ||
| Ugh. Is birdface really going to take us to July? | ||
| Mr. Trump faces a treacherous legal road. | ||
| Ah, Ms. Haley could stay in the race, rack up delegates, and see what happens if he is found guilty. | ||
| Ah, there it is. | ||
| Strange things can happen with candidates who are this old. | ||
| Oh, and this disliked by the majority of the public. | ||
| Well, that's just a blatant lie. | ||
| The 2024 election may have more twists before Trump vs. | ||
| Biden die is cast. Yeah, that's their plan. | ||
| Vivek Ramaswamy called it day one. | ||
| He said the establishment's plan is to have it down to Haley and Trump and then convict Trump, arrest Trump, or worse, and then say, oh, well, I guess it's got to be Haley then. | ||
| Guess it's just gotta be Haley. | ||
| Oh no, they took Trump out. | ||
| Well, at least we've got Haley. | ||
| At least we've got Bird Freak. | ||
| By the way, there was some story about her having affairs and that's a whole other thing I don't really care to get into. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But... Man. | |
| Can you imagine a Haley... | ||
| Biden election, ugh, get your passports. | ||
| Head down to El Salvador, maybe Russia, you know, maybe somewhere. | ||
| Might want to be somewhere else for that. | ||
| So here are the numbers, guys. | ||
| Let's see what we got. We'll start with 2016. | ||
| And I want to see how many votes Donald Trump got in 2016. | ||
| 100,000. | ||
| Pretty much 100,000 on the dot. | ||
| Donald Trump got 100,000 votes in the 2016 New Hampshire primary. | ||
| Now, granted, there were five other candidates at that time. | ||
| And Bernie Sanders was mopping the floor with Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Bernie Sanders, who they stole the nomination from in 2016. | ||
| We all remember that. | ||
| Bernie dominated New Hampshire and it really dominated the primaries and then they just got rid of him. | ||
| Probably bought him off. Alright, so now let's see 2020. | ||
| So Trump got 100,000 votes in 2016. | ||
| And then last night Trump got 174,000 votes. | ||
| So that's a major boost. | ||
| There were still other candidates on the ticket that were getting votes. | ||
| The Democrat Nikki Haley. | ||
| Of course, you had DeSantis and Christie and Ramaswamy and some others getting some votes there, even though they're not even in the race anymore. | ||
| But I think the numbers don't lie. | ||
| Donald Trump is more popular now than he was in 2016. | ||
| And here's one for you. | ||
| Donald Trump got more votes than Bernie Sanders. | ||
| In 2016. So, you might argue Donald Trump had the most successful primary result in New Hampshire's history. | ||
| One could make that argument. | ||
| But somehow, somehow Haley will find a way to twist that and say, this just shows I need to stay in the race. | ||
| Josh Howley, he needs to be the future leader of the Republican Senate. | ||
| He says, Trump is the clear winner. | ||
| Time to stop fighting each other and unite to beat Biden. | ||
| Somebody tell Ronna McDaniel that. | ||
| Somebody tell Birdface. | ||
| Somebody tell Birdface Haley that. | ||
| I think that Trump calls her, what does he call her, Birdface or Birdbrain? | ||
| Birdbeak? Birdbrain is what Trump calls her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So... That's good. | |
| That's good. So, here's now Dean Phillips. | ||
| Here's now Dean Phillips, who is running against Biden, commenting on the race last night and where we're at politically. | ||
| Here's Dean Phillips talking about Trump supporters in clip two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have a crisis of participation. | |
| And I gotta tell you guys, I went to a Donald Trump rally a couple nights ago. | ||
| Never been to one. I had an event across the street. | ||
| I saw the line of people waiting in the cold for hours. | ||
| And I thought, what the heck? | ||
| I'm going to be a leader who actually invites people, doesn't condemn them. | ||
| Met probably 50 Trump people waiting in line. | ||
| Every single one of them. | ||
| Thoughtful, hospitable, friendly. | ||
| All of them so frustrated that they feel nobody's listening to them but Donald Trump. | ||
| A diverse crowd. | ||
| People who had never been to a Trump event before. | ||
| My party is completely delusional right now. | ||
| Oh! He's right, by the way. | ||
| I kind of like Dean Phillips. Remember when Andrew Yang was begging Marianne Williamson to drop out and endorse Dean Phillips? | ||
| And then everybody said, who, who, and who? | ||
| Yang might be on his side. | ||
| Dean Phillips is not a bad candidate. | ||
| He might bring some sanity and some centralization back to the Democrat Party. | ||
| But right now you've got Joe Biden. | ||
| Here's Dean Phillips again making comments on the current political status that we have in America right now in clip three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
15,000 times. | |
| I'm only doing this to defeat Donald Trump. | ||
| Nobody seems to want to do that in the Democratic Party right now other than me because Joe Biden can't is my proposition because the data says he can't. | ||
| No one in the country right now cares. | ||
| In fact, most of the people in the country are going to the Trump rally right now because he's listening to them. | ||
| No one's asking about this stuff. | ||
| I'm just frustrated. I hope you understand why I'm getting tired of it. | ||
| You're doing your jobs, but you're not asking the questions that Americans give a **** about. | ||
| I kind of like this Dean Phillips. | ||
| I think I'm going to predict a Dean Phillips rise. | ||
| Now, the Democrat Party is obviously not going to accept him. | ||
| The Democrat Party is obviously not going to give him any wind in his sails. | ||
| But that's fine. | ||
| You know, the Democrats kind of need their own version of Trump. | ||
| And it's not going to be Crystal Ball, Marianne Williamson. | ||
| It's not going to be I like math, Andrew Yang. | ||
| It's not going to be I'll sell out Bernie Sanders. | ||
| But Dean Phillips is the kind of guy who can do that. | ||
| I mean, he's calling out the corruption in his own party. | ||
| Not even Bernie Sanders would do that after they stole the primary from him. | ||
| I think Dean Phillips is going to have a bit of a rise here. | ||
| And... The media can't help themselves. | ||
| When a guy generates views and a guy generates content and a guy generates controversy, the media will gravitate towards him. | ||
| I think Dean Phillips, I don't be surprised if Dean Phillips becomes a bit of a household name in the next couple months. | ||
| And if he has the political savvy that he appears to have, he'll learn which direction to punch and he'll learn Which punches to use when to get the attention? | ||
| I think Dean Phillips is going to have a bit of a rise here, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Do not be surprised if Dean Phillips becomes a household name. | ||
| Now, some other news going on. | ||
| You've got the Democrats continuing on their push. | ||
| Abortion is their big issue. | ||
| Gretchen Whitmer was rallying and campaigning in Michigan. | ||
| Obviously a big swing state. | ||
| On reproductive rights, another misnomer of the Democrat Party, saying that women need to get out and vote for your reproductive rights. | ||
| Don't underestimate the abortion vote, folks. | ||
| And it's not even necessarily that all these women like abortion. | ||
| They really believe the propaganda that Republicans are somehow against reproductive rights, which is, again, just a misnomer. | ||
| And they really believe that if you have an abortion, then some Republican is going to come after you in the middle of the night and haul you to jail. | ||
| Or if you're a doctor, you're going to get hauled to jail. | ||
| And it's all misrepresentation of what the pro-life bills and the end of Roe versus Wade really represents. | ||
| But they're trying to use that to get people to vote in November. | ||
| That's all they have. So they're going to run on the abortion issue. | ||
| They're going to run on the Reproductive rights issue. | ||
| That's really all they have. | ||
| Now, guys, did we get the shortened clip for Charles Payne here so that we missed kind of that introduction? | ||
| So this is incredible. | ||
| Charles Payne on a panel last night, Charles Payne of Fox News, He has a show on the Fox Business Network. | ||
| Very, very money, financial-oriented show. | ||
| And he was on a panel last night with a couple of libtards on it. | ||
| And he just unloaded. | ||
| And, I mean, you want to talk about how Americans are feeling right now. | ||
| You want to talk about a guy who took it right to the heart of the Biden hate. | ||
| Charles Payne last night on a Fox panel after the New Hampshire primary was called for Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You've lived in New York long enough. | |
| You know, it's maybe a New York thing. | ||
| Someone punches you, you punch him back harder. | ||
| That's the way I grew up in Harlem. | ||
| Not as the country's at stake, right? | ||
| He won. He became president of the United States with that same personality. | ||
| I don't think that, you know, listen, I think it's worse with Biden calling MAGA. Biden's anger and vitriol and hatred for MAGA is far more worse than President Trump's individual battles with someone who crosses him. | ||
| That is something that is really detrimental to this country, that the President of the United States despises half of the United States. | ||
| President Biden, I said earlier today, just about a week ago, I had a segment coming up, so I Googled Biden hates MAGA. Nothing but articles after articles after articles. | ||
| He has expressed hatred for who's in the country. | ||
| It doesn't matter. And it's not. | ||
| Because the bottom line is he says it. | ||
| We have vitriol for them, and so does MSNBC, and so does CNN, and so does the New York Times. | ||
| They have vitriol for half of the nation. | ||
| They don't look at them like fellow Americans, and it's unfortunate. | ||
| They try to paint them as racist. | ||
| All the things that they do to their fellow Americans who simply want a safe home, a safe community, for their children and prosperity, they want the same thing. | ||
| But they demean them all the time. | ||
| That's why I think Phillips was so intriguing, because he went to a rally. | ||
| To find out for himself. | ||
| And guess what? Golly, these are some pretty cool people. | ||
| They're just like us. That's exactly what Jamie Donovan said this week as well. | ||
| She can't even fathom this. | ||
| So there you go. | ||
| Charles Payne. I mean, that's what it is right there. | ||
| That's the frustration. | ||
| And a guy like Charles Payne, here's a guy who's very mild-mannered. | ||
| He does a business-oriented show. | ||
| He'll make money for you if you're a Democrat or a Republican. | ||
| Buy his book. He doesn't care what color your skin is or who you vote for or anything. | ||
| He just wants to make you money. | ||
| And so he just sits back here as a common-sense, rational conservative, and he just says... | ||
| Let's say what's really going on here. | ||
| The Democrat Party hates this country. | ||
| They hate Trump voters and they don't even try to hide it. | ||
| It's not just Joe Biden. | ||
| It's all of them. | ||
| It's the media. It's their voters. | ||
| It's their judges. | ||
| It's their teachers. | ||
| It's their lawyers. | ||
| It's their doctors. | ||
| They hate this country. | ||
| And they hate Trump voters. | ||
| They have hate in their heart. | ||
| And when your heart is filled with hate, you're blinded to reality. | ||
| Just like Jessica Tarlov there, who just, oh man, don't you love that? | ||
| She tries to open her mouth to respond and just, no. | ||
| Sorry. Sorry, the rational man is talking. | ||
| Libtard, silence yourself. | ||
| And everything he said is true. | ||
| But they don't want that message to reach the general population. | ||
| They don't want that message to be felt. | ||
| By the average American that it's just common sense, not even politically fired up like a Charles Payne. | ||
| But now that's how they feel. | ||
| That's what they know. | ||
| And that's what they express at the polls. | ||
| To the record number of votes for Donald Trump until Joe Biden got the vote Viagra, until Joe Biden got the mail-in votes in the middle of the night. | ||
| And everybody knows it. Everybody knows it. | ||
| All right, we're going to continue our political coverage when we come back. | ||
| We got a statement from Greg Abbott on the border. | ||
| We got a statement from Carrie Lake on the political bribery. | ||
| We also got a guest coming up in studio, an FBI, former FBI agent to respond to the latest January 6th information where the Democrats are hiding evidence and they don't want to talk about the pipe bomb video either. | ||
| All right, we got some more political news coming up, including a statement from DeSantis. | ||
| That a lot of Trump supporters, like my friend Laura Loomer, are bashing DeSantis for making. | ||
| And I say, hey, not so fast. | ||
| He makes a good point here. But we'll bring that up in a second. | ||
| Now, ladies and gentlemen, it is winter. | ||
| And unfortunately, here in Austin and a lot of places around the United States of America, that means there's no sun out. | ||
| No sun. No good weather. | ||
| No sun. And so because of that, you're not getting the vitamin D that you need from the sun. | ||
| And that's why they call it cold season, flu season, because you're not getting that vitamin D. And your immune system is more susceptible to getting sick. | ||
| That's why at InfoWarsStore.com we have Winter Sun Plus Vitamin D3 Supplement. | ||
| There's no better time to make sure that you're getting your vitamin D3 supplement. | ||
| That your body needs, then right now with Winter Sun Plus, 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| An update to the classic InfoWars Life formula, Winter Sun Plus, contains 100 micrograms of vitamin D per serving, as well as vitamin K and E to enhance the formula and provide you with even more whole body support. | ||
| Winter Sun Plus' incredible formula works together to promote calcium absorption, support the body's natural immune system, and provide the necessary vitamin D for whole body support. | ||
| And vitamin D and K work together synergistically to maximize the benefits of both vitamins for your body. | ||
| At 40% off, it's the best way to get your nutraceutical vitamin D3 for less. | ||
| While supporting the InfoWars crew and live transmissions, don't wait until it's gone for good. | ||
| Get Winter Sun Plus 40% off today at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now, if you got kids... | ||
| And you're thinking about, well, what about the kiddos? | ||
| Maybe they're not going to like this tincture. | ||
| How am I going to get them to take a vitamin D3 tincture? | ||
| Well, we've got the D3 gummies. | ||
| Put those on the counter. | ||
| Put two of those on the counter every morning for your kids. | ||
| They'll eat them up. They'll love the taste. | ||
| They'll be asking you every morning, where are my lemon-flavored gummies? | ||
| They won't even know that these gummies are making them healthier. | ||
| They'll just think you're cool for letting them eat a gummy bear in the morning. | ||
| So there you go. Your kids will like you more, and they'll be getting their vitamin D3. That's a total win-win. | ||
| And you're supporting the InfoWare in the process. | ||
| The vitamin D3 gummies. | ||
| InfoWareStore.com. Also, 40% off. | ||
| All right. So, I think Ron DeSantis makes a good point here. | ||
| He's talking about COVID accountability. | ||
| Now, again, the Trump loyalists are bashing DeSantis, saying, shut up, DeSantis, you lost, blah, blah, blah. | ||
| It's like, hey, let's just relax. | ||
| He dropped out of the race. Let's support him. | ||
| He's been a good governor for Florida. | ||
| But I think DeSantis raises a good point here about COVID accountability in clip five. | ||
| One of the frustrating things with the campaign was I was the only one that wanted to talk about this. | ||
| No one else wanted to talk about COVID. I think there was one question in all the debates that brought up COVID. I had to inject it into different debates, whether it's Fauci, whether it's accountability, you name it. | ||
| But this was one of the biggest events in our life. | ||
| And yet we had one candidate who was president at the start of it. | ||
| And when he'd get interviewed, no one would even ask him questions about it. | ||
| And so I think what we're doing is important. | ||
| I think that it potentially can lead to some reform. | ||
| But one of the regrets I have about kind of how 24 is turning out is I don't see at the federal level there being any avenue for COVID accountability. | ||
| I think that you're going to have two major candidates that just want to pretend like everything was hunky-dory. | ||
| And I know both of those presidents made serious, serious mistakes. | ||
| And here's the thing. It's not about using it for fodder in a political campaign. | ||
| It's about ensuring that this never happens to our country ever again. | ||
| I think he's 100% right. | ||
| But, you know, it's odd. | ||
| We played his dropout video. | ||
| Ron DeSantis, he flew too close to the sun. | ||
| He clearly was not ready for a presidential race. | ||
| He wasn't ready to go up against the likes of Donald Trump. | ||
| Because now that he's back in his comfort zone, it's like the old Ron DeSantis again. | ||
| I mean, that sounds like the old Ron DeSantis. | ||
| Very well spoken and right on point. | ||
| And doesn't look nervous. | ||
| Like he wants to climb into a shell or something. | ||
| But I think DeSantis raises a great point. | ||
| Now, the problem is, when it comes to COVID accountability, how many Americans are really thinking about that when they go to the polls? | ||
| How big of an issue is that for 2024? | ||
| It's really just, it's not that big of an issue. | ||
| And DeSantis is right. That's a shame. | ||
| That's a shame. Because we're staring down this disease X scenario where the World Health Organization is looking for every nation state to sign over their sovereignty to the corporate global government, to the World Health Organization to fight a disease X, which they can make in a lab. And then release it. | ||
| Now you've got your disease X. Now you've got your global government, your medical tyranny. | ||
| So DeSantis is right. | ||
| And there's far too few voices in Congress that are talking about this. | ||
| There's far too few voices in the media that are talking about this. | ||
| It's not going to be an issue in the presidential race. | ||
| And so what? | ||
| If disease X or whatever happens, we sign over our sovereignty to the World Health Organization like Biden's going to do, and then what? | ||
| A corporate global government says wear a mask. | ||
| A corporate global government says take a vaccine. | ||
| A corporate global government says shut down your business. | ||
| And then you're going to be left to the will of your state's governor to be strong and stand in defiance of that. | ||
| Like DeSantis, who was the leading example. | ||
| You had Kristi Noem kind of coming up as well, and then Abbott in the later days. | ||
| But DeSantis is right. Where is the COVID accountability for the Communist Chinese? | ||
| Where is the COVID accountability to the federal government that engaged in so much unconstitutional, tyrannical behavior? | ||
| Where is the COVID accountability when it comes to the vaccines? | ||
| Which, I mean, there's more news on the vaccines killing people every day. | ||
| Got a story right here from a Dr. | ||
| William Mackis, MRNA Injury Stories. | ||
| And he's got a bunch of them, but specifically talking about this Brazilian model, dead at 35 on January 12th, developed new psoriasis that consumed 80% of her body, then died of cardiac arrest. | ||
| Psoriasis and flare-up is common injury after COVID-19 mRNA injection. | ||
| I present 10-plus cases in published literature after Pfizer where Moderna mRNA jabs. | ||
| Weight loss influencer Mila DeJesus, dead at 35. | ||
| Brazilian mom of four. Rose to fame online after undergoing bariatric surgery in October 2017 and sharing her weight loss journey with her 59,000 Instagram followers. | ||
| Then she got the COVID vaccine. | ||
| She got psoriasis and had cardiac arrest. | ||
| And she is now dead. | ||
| And the crew is sharing the gruesome images on the screen. | ||
| And he talks about more of these cases. | ||
| So where's the accountability? | ||
| Not gonna be from Trump. | ||
| I mean, let's just call it what it is. | ||
| Not gonna be from Trump. | ||
| He knows he's partially culpable for Operation Warp Speed and putting Fauci in charge and letting the country shut down and the fear-mongering and everything. | ||
| Instead of going with his gut instincts, which were right in the beginning, it's just the flu. | ||
| Don't freak out. But then they got him to panic and they got him to go along for the ride. | ||
| And the rest is history. So you're not going to get COVID accountability, I don't think, from Donald Trump. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now look, I don't... | |
| Nobody's trying to deceive you here. | ||
| I'm not a political purist. | ||
| There's never going to be a politician that I agree with on everything. | ||
| I'm very pragmatic when it comes to my politics. | ||
| Donald Trump is clearly the right candidate right now. | ||
| And he's the best option we have. | ||
| I really don't see any debate. | ||
| When you measure it all, when you weigh it all, you might like DeSantis more, you might like this person more, that person more, but if they don't have a chance of winning, then what's the point? | ||
| And this isn't like 2016, when Infowars could throw its weight around to influence Donald Trump to the Republican primary victory. | ||
| Trump's already earned his own victory. | ||
| It doesn't matter what we do now. | ||
| So I'm behind Donald Trump, but DeSantis is 100% right. | ||
| There's not going to be any COVID accountability, and it's not going to be there with Donald Trump either. | ||
| All right, we've got some big border news, including a statement, very powerful statement from Greg Abbott. | ||
| And I think if I'm doing like an efficiency rating or a proficiency rating, I think this might be the highest rated thing Abbott has done, quite frankly. | ||
| Because even the stuff down at the border with the National Guard and the barbed wire, if anything, that's just a deterrent for a moment or a detour, probably a better way to put it. | ||
| Because the illegal immigrants are getting in no matter what. | ||
| But the barbed wire might deter them for a day or two or might send them on a detour. | ||
| They're still getting in. Abbott busing the illegal immigrants to all these Democrat-run cities. | ||
| Good political optics. | ||
| It did prove a point. | ||
| But then you look at the final result and what is that? | ||
| Well, now the... Blue states like Illinois and New York, their electoral count goes up with the population, with the illegal immigrants counting to the population, and then Democrats get more votes in presidential elections. | ||
| So, okay, that's a big L, too. | ||
| But this is almost like maximum efficiency and proficiency here. | ||
| Like, there's no negatives to this. | ||
| So I'm going to read that, but we've got a couple other developments first. | ||
| So, we've seen the illegal immigrants taking over airports. | ||
| Now the latest is Boston Logan Airport. | ||
| Guys, show me clip 10. | ||
| And so it's the same thing we're seeing in Chicago and New York and soon it'll be your airport. | ||
| These are illegal immigrants that are now living in Logan International Airport in Boston. | ||
| They have nowhere to go, and they go to the airports because they wait for their free tickets. | ||
| Or they have a flight in a couple days or a couple weeks, and so they just live at the airport until their U.S. taxpayer airplane is ready to take off. | ||
| But so now they're living in airports, they're living in police stations, they're living in your hotels, they're living in homeless centers meant for Americans. | ||
| It's the invasion. | ||
| It's on, baby. | ||
| It's the Biden border invasion. | ||
| Now, a crazy development. | ||
| Let us first remind you of this video from earlier this week that was stunning, where an independent journalist crosses an illegal immigrant And he basically puffs up his chest and says, you'll know who I am, sounding very, very threatening, very ominous video from first responders media at the border. | ||
| In case you missed it, here was that video that went massively viral, very ominous earlier this week. | ||
|
unidentified
|
By the way, if you are smart enough, you will know who I am. | |
| But you are really not smart enough to know who I am. | ||
| But soon you're going to know who I am. | ||
| The entitlement. | ||
| The entitlement. No, believe me. | ||
| I'm much better than that. | ||
| The entitlement, guys. | ||
| Wow. So, maybe that individual was right, saying, soon you will know who I am. | ||
| Because we may have had this individual identified. | ||
| Now, Mario Nafal is reporting. | ||
| This is really just up for determination here. | ||
| But there seems to be some similarities, if it's not the exact same person. | ||
| Mystery migrant identified? | ||
| Mavsam Samadov, the head of the Islamic Party of Azerbaijan, Who served 12 years in prison and was released in January 2023. | ||
| Looks very similar to the man in this video that just illegally crossed into the United States. | ||
| Now, they look similar. | ||
| That doesn't necessarily prove anything other than that they look similar. | ||
| But I mean, yeah, the beard looks similar. | ||
| The hair coloring in the beard looks similar. | ||
| I mean, the face, the nose, the glasses. | ||
| I mean, it's the doppelganger if it is not him. | ||
| But I think the biggest reason to think that that could be the individual is the way he talked. | ||
| He said, you'll know who I am. | ||
| Soon you'll know who I am. | ||
| Very ominous, very threatening. | ||
| Well, if this was a guy who was the head of the Islamic Party who just got released from 12 years in prison, what does that say? | ||
| I mean, that's shocking stuff right there. | ||
| So, there's so many different angles. | ||
| There's so many different avenues to take. | ||
| But if you're supposed to take everything at face value, which we don't, but let's just say we're taking everything at face value. | ||
| We're supposed to believe that radical Islamic terrorists hate our country and want us all dead, and that's why they attacked us on September 11th, the biggest terror attack in the history of this country, from radical Islamic terrorists. | ||
| Well, because of that, you get felt up and treated like a criminal at the airport and with the Patriot Act. | ||
| But now the border is wide open and a radical Islamic terrorist from the Islamic party of Azerbaijan, who just served 12 years in prison, might have just come across the southern border and made ominous and threatening comments to media. | ||
| Now you tell me how that's not a nationally significant development when it all seems to add up. | ||
| Now forget about taking things at face value. | ||
| What is this guy doing in the United States of America if it is this Islamic leader? | ||
| Why is he on camera in a very aggressive, ominous, threatening way to the media questioning illegal immigrants saying, you'll know who I am soon? | ||
| Is it because he knew he would be identified as the Islamic party of Azerbaijan or some other reasons? | ||
| So this is why Greg Abbott wants to protect the southern border. | ||
| That the Biden administration has wide open. | ||
| Here is Governor Greg Abbott's statement released as of this morning. | ||
| The federal government has broken the compact between the United States and the states. | ||
| The executive branch of the United States has a constitutional duty to enforce federal laws protecting states including immigration laws on the books right now. | ||
| President Biden has refused to enforce those laws and has even violated them. | ||
| The result is that he has smashed records for illegal immigration. | ||
| Despite having been put on notice in a series of letters, one of which I delivered to him | ||
| by hand, President Biden has ignored Texas's demand that he performed his constitutional | ||
| duties. | ||
| President Biden has violated his oath to faithfully execute immigration laws enacted by Congress. | ||
| Instead of prosecuting immigrants for the federal crime of illegal entry, President | ||
| Biden has sent his lawyers into federal courts to sue Texas for taking action to secure the | ||
| President Biden has instructed his agencies to ignore federal statutes that mandate the detention of illegal immigrants. | ||
| The effect is so illegal... | ||
| The effect is to illegally allow them in mass parole into the United States. | ||
| By wasting taxpayer dollars to tear open Texas's border security infrastructure, | ||
| President Biden has enticed illegal immigrants away from the 28 legal entry points along the | ||
| state's southern border, bridges where nobody drowns, and into the dangerous waters of the Rio | ||
| Grande. Under President Biden's lawless border policies, more than 6 million illegal immigrants | ||
| have crossed our southern border in just three years. It's actually closer to eight. | ||
| That is more than the population of 33 different states in this country. So more illegal immigrants | ||
| have entered the country than 33 state entire populations. | ||
| This illegal refusal to protect the states has inflicted unprecedented harm on the people | ||
| all across the United States. | ||
| James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and the other visionaries who wrote the US Constitution foresaw that states should not be left to the mercy of a lawless president who does nothing to stop external threats like cartels smuggling millions of illegal immigrants across the borders. | ||
| That is why the framers included both Article 4, Subsection 4, which promises that the federal government shall protect each state against invasion, and Article 1, Subsection 10, Clause 3, which acknowledges the state's sovereign interest in protecting their borders. | ||
| Arizona versus United States 567 US 387 419 2002 Scalia J dissenting. | ||
| The failure of the Biden administration to fulfill the duties imposed by Article 4 Subsection | ||
| 4 has triggered our triggered Article 1 Subsection 10 Clause 3, which reserves to this state | ||
| the right of self-defense. | ||
| For these reasons, I have already declared an invasion under Article 1 Subsection 10 | ||
| Clause 3 to invoke Texas's constitutional authority to defend and protect itself. | ||
| That authority is the supreme law of the land and supersedes any federal statutes to the | ||
| The Texas National Guard, the Department of Public Safety and other Texas personnel are acting on that authority as well as state law to secure the Texas border. | ||
| Greg Abbott. | ||
| This is about as good as it gets. | ||
| I think this is probably the strongest move from Abbott. | ||
| Stronger than the busing of illegal immigrants because there is a negative to that. | ||
| Stronger than the attempt to secure the southern border with the barbed wire in the Texas National Guard because that proves to just be a detour. | ||
| And even the Texas National Guard ends up being used to facilitate the illegal invasion. | ||
| But that's almost a maximum proficiency. | ||
| Now, he needs to take it further, though. | ||
| There needs to be mass lawsuits against Joe Biden and the Biden administration in Mayorkas. | ||
| They need to bring families who have had individuals killed by illegal immigrants. | ||
| They need to bring people who have property on the southern border, | ||
| involving them in lawsuits that have had their property damaged or had things stolen | ||
| by illegal immigrants. And there needs to be some form of a declaration of independence. | ||
| If Greg Abbott wants to lead it and get other Republican governors and mayors and Democrat | ||
| mayors to sign it, say Joe Biden, stop the southern invasion at the border. | ||
| Stop the border invasion now. | ||
| It's illegal. All right, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| So the question is now, what's next? | ||
| Because the border invasion is still not going to be stopped. | ||
| It's still not stopping. And the strong-worded letter to Biden is not going to stop it. | ||
| The Texas National Guard is not going to stop it. | ||
| All of that has been proven. Legal action must be taken. | ||
| And there needs to be unity inside the Republican Party, but unfortunately there's no leadership. | ||
| I don't know what angle you want to take, but there's many different angles to choose from. | ||
| Do you just have a Declaration of Independence? | ||
| And you just say, we declare ourselves independent of the federal government that's clearly corrupted? | ||
| Do you have mass lawsuits involving victims of illegal immigration and states that are sick of it and mayors that are sick of it and say, we're suing Joe Biden? | ||
| You have been the number one human trafficker in the history of this country? | ||
| You have facilitated, aided, and abetted in a federal crime? | ||
| And then, I mean, it's a million times over. | ||
| So what's the prison sentence? | ||
| Five bajillion years? | ||
| I mean, yeah, go that far. | ||
| What is the punishment if I aid and abet an illegal entry to this country? | ||
| Let's say just one individual. | ||
| Let's say the punishment for that is 10 years. | ||
| Well, Joe Biden's done it for 7 million, so what is that? | ||
| 700 million years in prison for Joe Biden? | ||
| Maybe it's the Republican Party needs to start impeaching Joe Biden over the southern border. | ||
| But see, that's the problem. There's no unity. | ||
| There's no unison. | ||
| There's no leadership. | ||
| And it's a damn shame. | ||
| But, you know, here's the thing. | ||
| This year is going to be crazy. | ||
| Or, yeah, Texas can just secede from the Union. | ||
| I'm not necessarily against that. | ||
| But this year is going to be so crazy, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| And there's going to be a lot of things that we don't see coming that are going to happen. | ||
| There are a lot of good people joining the fight to save this country. | ||
| That aren't doing it for fame. | ||
| They aren't doing it for the media. | ||
| They don't care if people know what they're involved in. | ||
| And this is all going to come to fruition in 2024. | ||
| But even that scathing letter written by Abbott is probably not going to have much of an impact. | ||
| So it's time to start putting some teeth behind this stuff. | ||
| I mean, just call for the outright arrest of Joe Biden. | ||
| Again, if I aid and abet in human trafficking, if I aid and abet in illegal immigration, human smuggling, there are laws on the books and there are punishments on the books. | ||
| Why don't they apply to Joe Biden? | ||
| Let's try it. Let's go that route. | ||
| So that's obviously the next step here. | ||
| But you know what? If Greg Abbott doesn't want to do it, if the Republicans in Congress don't want to do it, folks, I'm telling you right now, the American citizens are getting fed up and sick and damn tired of this. | ||
| And we saw one example. | ||
| There was a guest on the Alex Jones show today. | ||
| He's been featured on this show. | ||
| And that's Dr. | ||
| Pete Chambers talking about a massive convoy. | ||
| They're going to be coming through Austin, by the way. | ||
| I think the website is fixourborder.com, guys? | ||
| It's coming up in February. | ||
| Takeourborderback.com, maybe, is the website. | ||
| What is it? Takeourborderback.com. | ||
| And it's a massive convoy. | ||
| They're going from capital to capital. | ||
| They're going to be here in Austin, Texas at the capital. | ||
| And then they're going to go to the southern border. | ||
| And this is just one thing that the American people that are sick and damn tired of our country being invaded, Joe Biden running the biggest invasion in the history of the world at our southern border. | ||
| There are going to be many other things that we're going to see this year of American citizens taking action against this illegal invasion. | ||
| Guarantee it. That's tomorrow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that is it for us today. | |
| Okay, I don't know. Whatever it is, it's not right on a teleprompter. | ||
| I don't know what that is. I've never seen that. | ||
| We are going to do Infowars. | ||
| Yeah. Okay, but... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now, I can't read it. | |
| There's no words on it. | ||
| Okay. Ready? | ||
| There's no words there to play us out. | ||
| What does that mean, to play us out? | ||
| Owen Schroer is going to do a new broadcast. | ||
| All right, go, go. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's tomorrow, and that is it for us today, and we will leave you with a... | |
| I can't do it. | ||
| We'll do it live. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. We'll do it live! | |
| Do it live! | ||
| While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| Visit infowars.com forward slash show and share the link today. | ||
| The program that strikes fear into the heart of the elite. | ||
| It's the war room. | ||
| Look at them yo-yos. | ||
| That's the way you do it. | ||
| You play the guitar on MTV. So, a huge story broke yesterday. | ||
| A leaked audio of Carrie Lake being bribed or attempting to be bribed or bought off. | ||
| By GOP chairman in Arizona, Jeff DeWitt, who has since released his own statement. | ||
| Carrie Lake is going to be releasing a statement tonight at 7 o'clock Central on Rumble. | ||
| Good news for Rumble. | ||
| I guess they're going to get that exclusive. | ||
| But we played the video yesterday, and it's truly stunning. | ||
| I mean, I don't know how this wasn't the biggest story in the nation last night, except that there was a primary going on. | ||
| And so that was the big story. | ||
| But this was nowhere in the mainstream news last night. | ||
| I mean, we even showed, we surfed the web live on air, and nobody had this on their front page. | ||
| I mean, this is a massive political scandal. | ||
| Massive. A Republican candidate attempting to be bought off by a sitting chairperson. | ||
| And then she says, well, you're going to have to kill me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm not getting out of the race. | |
| So, I mean, this has all kinds of huge implications and pretty much goes ignored. | ||
| And Carrie Lake did talk about it at CPAC, which kind of fell on deaf ears because I guess everybody assumes that that's how corrupt DC is. | ||
| But then you get the actual audio and the evidence and it's just mind-blowing. | ||
| Like, you would expect this in... | ||
| That show that Kevin Spacey is in, House of Cards, or like some movie about political corruption or a TV show. | ||
| I mean, that's how heavy this thing is. | ||
| And it's like it barely even makes the waves of the mainstream media. | ||
| So she's going to be releasing a statement. | ||
| Now, the Arizona Republican Party released the statement from Chairman Jeff DeWitt, where he's basically saying, oh, it's all edited, taken out of context. | ||
| Here's the statement, or at least part of it, from DeWitt. | ||
| In light of the recent revelation that Carrie Lake has released a selectively edited audio recording of our private conversation, I must clearly address this deceptive tactic. | ||
| The recording from over 10 months ago is not only taken out of context, but also undermines the integrity of private discussions critical for party leadership. | ||
| And it goes on and on. So, let's see what Lake's response to this is. | ||
| Now, imagine... Nothing about that seems edited. | ||
| DeWitt is claiming it's edited. | ||
| Now, I was sitting here in disbelief that it was even real. | ||
| That's how hardcore it was. | ||
| But let's see what Lake says about, oh, it was edited. | ||
| And DeWitt gives her the ammo to respond to this statement now tonight. | ||
| Saying it was selectively edited. | ||
| Well, what does that mean? It was an hour-long conversation and she just put out 10 minutes of the most hardcore? | ||
| Is he claiming that she cut it and pasted it in different ways to make it sound worse than it really was? | ||
| The things that were said were said. | ||
| But imagine DeWitt coming out and saying that Carrie Lake releasing this Clear-cut evidence of corruption is bad for party leadership. | ||
| You don't say. | ||
| You don't say. | ||
| Carrie Lake exposing corruption at party leadership level is bad for party leadership. | ||
| Wow. Talk about a statement. | ||
| He goes on. I mean, the irony here. | ||
| My primary duty is to strengthen our party by trying to buy out the most popular candidate? | ||
| This is spoken like a true Democrat. | ||
| This sounds like a Democrat. | ||
| Oh, this is bad for party leadership. | ||
| Oh, you don't say showing corruption in party leadership is bad for party leadership. | ||
| It's my job. To strengthen our party by trying to buy off the most popular candidate? | ||
| Interesting strategy. | ||
| So really looking forward to Carrie Lake's response to this, the audio, as well as what DeWitt is saying here. | ||
| Was there any editing done? | ||
| In what context was there any editing done? | ||
| Was anything taken out of context? | ||
| Because it seems pretty blatant. | ||
| DeWitt, in a very rat-like manner, he knows what he's doing is at least unethical, if not outright illegal, and you can tell by the way he's speaking and his tone of voice in the tape, trying to buy her out of the race. | ||
| I'm not loyal to the Republican Party, but yeah, if Republican candidates... | ||
| Are going to expose corruption at the highest levels of the Republican Party? | ||
| Well, that's a good thing. | ||
| But I guess not for the corrupt individuals like Jeff DeWitt. | ||
| And I guess that's where we have our problem here, isn't it? | ||
| So again, Carrie Lake addressing this tonight. | ||
| She says she's getting a lot of questions about the bribery scandal and corruption in D.C. I have decided to go live on Rumble tonight at 7 p.m. | ||
| Central to answer your questions. | ||
| I hope you'll join me. | ||
| So I don't know exactly what that means, if she's going to be reading comments or taking phone calls or how that's going to be, but I guess Rumble gets that exclusive good for Rumble, good for free speech. | ||
| And I look forward. | ||
| I look forward to seeing what Carrie Lake has to say. | ||
| Because this, I mean, this is the... | ||
| I mean, there's so much political corruption. | ||
| There's so much political scandal. | ||
| I've got another story I'll get into right now. | ||
| But this is an audio tape of a Republican chairman trying to buy off a candidate. | ||
| And you can tell by his toned voice, he knows what he's doing is completely unethical, if not entirely illegal. | ||
| So, all kinds of political scandals, but this is bombshell level. | ||
| This is bombshell level. | ||
| So, could you say it's the political scandal of the month, of the year? | ||
| I mean, I don't know, with all the other scandals, but the audio tape is certainly massive. | ||
| Now, here's another one. Jonathan Turley knocks District Attorney Fannie Willis over her response to subpoena in Lover's divorce case. | ||
| I think she's made a big mistake here. | ||
| The damage is already done for Fannie Willis, and in many ways, she's really magnifying that damage with her moves. | ||
| She filed a motion before the court that attacked the estranged wife of her alleged lover as an adulterer and political conspirator. | ||
| It was the worst possible tact that she could have taken. | ||
| She could have just said, I'm not relevant. | ||
| She could have said in a deposition, a deposition is not needed, and instead, she did this full-on attack, and that only raises further questions. | ||
| You have the original decision that she made, which in my view is deeply unethical, in hiring someone she had an alleged intimate relationship with, but she compounded that afterwards in her response. | ||
| It is clear that Mr. | ||
| Wade and Willis herself are undermining the case for her office. | ||
| Yeah. Now, imagine... | ||
| You're already in big trouble with your alleged adulterous lover who you're using as a prosecutor against Donald Trump. | ||
| And the one linchpin that could either save you or destroy you is the wife of the man that you were allegedly sleeping with. | ||
| And your move is to attack her. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good luck. Good luck. | |
| So if the wife or estranged wife of Wade was considering about dropping this or potentially could have been bought off or shut up, Fannie Willis attacking her might have changed her mind. | ||
| Hmm. Interesting strategy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
See how it works out for her. | |
| Does Adam Schiff have a problem with In his Senate race. | ||
| Can a Dodgers legend really win California's Senate race? | ||
| Steve Garvey is betting his star power can break California Republicans' losing streak. | ||
| Now, he's obviously a long shot, but he played with the Dodgers. | ||
| He was a pretty famous Dodgers player. | ||
| Also played with the Giants. | ||
| Won an MVP award. | ||
| Won a couple NLCS MVP awards. | ||
| I think he won one World Series even. | ||
| So he's got some star power for baseball fans. | ||
| How much does that equate to a political victory? | ||
| Probably not too much. | ||
| But he has had some good moments against Adam Schiff in the debates. | ||
| And Adam Schiff is a pencil-neck freak liar. | ||
| So you'd think that there'd be an opening there. | ||
| But he's getting some coverage in the mainstream media. | ||
| That'll be an interesting one to follow. | ||
| Adam Schiff, one of the worst of all time. | ||
| Chuck Schumer. | ||
| This is interesting. | ||
| These people are, these Democrats are control freak tyrants. | ||
| Chuck Schumer calls for federal action on Zin nicotine pouches. | ||
| Zin nicotine pouches. | ||
| So, you know, I don't think Tucker Carlson ever wanted to get involved politically, but now that Schumer is coming after his zen, maybe Carlson gets motivated to actually get involved politically. | ||
| Schumer is going after Carlson's zen. | ||
| I've never tried zen. | ||
| Now I kind of want to. But the crew says somebody back there has some zen. | ||
| Bring it on in. | ||
| Bring in the zen. | ||
| Go ahead. You guys are afraid that somebody's going to take your zen? | ||
| I want the zen. I want the zen. | ||
| Bring me the zen. Bring it in. | ||
| Bring the zen in the studio. The crew is afraid I'm going to get addicted. | ||
| I'm going to be the next Carlson. | ||
| All right, here we go. Uh-oh. | ||
| Here we go. Here is the dangerous zen. | ||
| What are the consequences of nicotine besides it being addictive? | ||
| Are there actual negative... | ||
| It says nicotine is an addictive chemical. | ||
| But what is the negative effect of nicotine? | ||
| These guys want me to try the pouch. | ||
| Should I pouch it? Chuck Schumer's coming after the zen! | ||
| What the hell is wrong with him? | ||
| No, I don't think I want to try the nicotine. | ||
| I don't know, but Schumer telling me, is this six milligrams? | ||
| Is this high dosage here, guys? | ||
| This is a medium dosage? | ||
| All right. Maybe we should take a vote on Twitter. | ||
| Should I pouch a Zen today on the air? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Should I pull a Tucker Carlson and pouch one? | |
| Schumer hates Zen, so now I'm kind of intrigued. | ||
| Now I kind of like it. There it is. | ||
| There's the evil Zen. | ||
| Ooh. There's the evil Zen that Chuck Schumer wants to have federal action take it on. | ||
| I mean, give me a break. | ||
| Kids will find a way to get anything. | ||
| I mean, I was smoking cigarettes at 16. | ||
| It's not like it's that hard. I'm not proud of that. | ||
| I don't smoke cigarettes anymore. | ||
| But, you know, you think it's cool. | ||
| Chuck Schumer's coming for Zen. | ||
| I mean, they're just such losers. | ||
| Why are these liberal Democrats such losers? | ||
|
unidentified
|
You take on the intelligence agencies, and they have six ways of Sunday of getting back at you. | |
| I'm Chuck Schubert. | ||
| I'm coming after your Zen products. | ||
| You like that Zen do you, kid? | ||
| I hear the kids really like Zen. | ||
| I'm going to make sure that I shut it down. | ||
| I don't want kids having any fun. | ||
| I don't want adults having any fun. | ||
| I'm Chuck Schumer. And then it's like a closet door opens behind him and 3,000 packs of Zen fall out of it. | ||
| The guy's pouching Zen all day. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm dirty Chuck Schumer, and I'm coming after your zen, because I'm a dirtbag Democrat. | |
| I'm a tyrannical Democrat. | ||
| I'm a control freak. | ||
| I mean, really, all you need to know, here's the zen. | ||
| I don't think I'm going to do it. The crew says don't do it. | ||
| The crew says don't do it. | ||
| You'll get addicted. Are you guys, are you admitting to something back there? | ||
| There's the dangerous zen. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Uh-oh, Chuck. Ooh. I'm going to get you, zen. | |
| You dirty zen. | ||
| And your little dog, too. | ||
| I'm dirty, dirty, dirtbag Democrat, Chuck Schumer. | ||
| What a psychotic freak. | ||
| So, okay. | ||
| Maybe this pushes Tucker Carlson over the edge to actually get involved politically. | ||
| What do you think about that? All right, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Well, we don't sell zen at infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Maybe we should. Maybe we should sell Zen or something similar. | ||
| Well, I guess we sell Turbo Force Plus. | ||
| That's some good stuff. I might have a caffeine addiction, I'll be honest, but no. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus, 10 hours of clean energy, 40% off at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| I cannot recommend it enough. | ||
| Secure your canister of Turbo Force Plus, 40% off today at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Now, everybody knows energy drinks, or I guess Zen, Are popular products because people are lethargic and they're looking for any kind of energy kick they can get. | ||
| But the toxic energy drinks that taste like battery acid, they got the high fructose corn syrup, they've got the processed sugar, all this unhealthy stuff. | ||
| It's not good for you. Turbo Force Plus, InfoWarsStore.com, has all kinds of good ingredients, including the energy kick. | ||
| It's 10 hours of clean energy. | ||
| It's 40% off right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And when you shop at InfoWarsStore.com, you support everything we do here, including the great crew and everything that they do, working more than 10 hours every day to keep all of our shows up and on the air. | ||
| Now, a very important report here as we go to break is And I'll lead it off with this. | ||
| Doug McGregor, there is no Soviet Union. | ||
| Russia poses no threat. | ||
| The problem is at home. The people that are the largest threat to the country are holding elected positions in our government. | ||
| This is awful. We must unite for a greater cause. | ||
| I tend to agree with Colonel McGregor. | ||
| Now, the Biden administration has a new angle to try to continue to arm Ukraine. | ||
| But first, here's the report of Victoria Nuland. | ||
| Is she the real president of Ukraine? | ||
| Ukraine, here's the latest report. | ||
| Last June, puppet President Volodymyr Zelensky warned the public that Russia was planning to attack the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine. | ||
| There is now talk in Kiev that the real president of Ukraine, Victoria Nuland, has become so desperate for NATO troops to enter Ukraine and continue this U.S. proxy war against Russia that she is willing to murder innocent locals with a radioactive cloud and blame it on Russian forces. | ||
| And if you know about Victoria Nuland and the government she works for, then this is absolutely a possibility. | ||
| Independent journalist Gonzalo Lira, who was arrested and left to die in his jail cell by Newland's forces, did an excellent job describing Victoria Newland and the United States agenda in Ukraine. | ||
| I highly recommend watching the entire thing. | ||
| But here is my short edit. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| The United States was able to enter Russia and exploit it to a degree that is unprecedented. | ||
| Ukraine, since 1991, the collapse of the Soviet Union, has been a cesspool of Western corruption. | ||
| Oligarchs were not only allowed to rise, but were in fact encouraged to rise by the Western powers, in particular the United States, because the United States figured that by way of these oligarchs, These countries could be controlled. | ||
| If Russia was corrupt, if Ukraine was corrupt, it would be easy for Western interests to go into these countries and steal. | ||
| When Putin arose, the people in the West thought, oh, he's one of our guys. | ||
| But what they discovered, to their dismay, was that when Putin took power in roughly 1999, he cut a deal. | ||
| With his oligarchs. | ||
| You stay out of politics, and I'll stay out of your grift. | ||
| But what happened was that slowly over the years, Putin started edging out the oligarchs. | ||
| And even as he put in his own oligarchs, he started making those oligarchs smaller and weaker, which is what he's been doing for the past 23 years. | ||
| Had Putin not existed in Russia, Russia would be what Ukraine is today. | ||
| Americans started realizing this in the late 2000s, early 2010s. | ||
| They started realizing that Putin was subtly resisting them, resisting their attempts to turn Russia into a whore. | ||
| These Ukrainian extremists, they hate ethnic Russians. | ||
| And that fits very neatly with Newland. | ||
| Because Nuland throughout her career, she has always allied herself with groups that were | ||
| Extremely antagonistic towards Russians. She's always allied herself with people who hate Russians when the Maidan | ||
| revolution started She supported the right sector | ||
| She micromanaged the Maidan revolution and that implicated her when Petrushenko came to power the next president | ||
| She made sure that that government abused the Russians and of course she made sure that the Ukrainian army | ||
| Started getting seriously supplied with weapons and she used that Ukrainian army | ||
| And she micromanaged this to attack the Donbass. You have to understand that in a very real sense | ||
| Victoria Nuland has been president of Ukraine since 2014 | ||
| And so the weapons flowed into Ukraine from starting in 2014 after the coup d'etat. | ||
| She brought in the weapons. | ||
| She's like the nexus of all these different interests that want to exploit Ukraine and use Ukraine To attack Russia, with the ultimate goal of breaking up Russia and bringing back the good old days of the 90s, the good old days for the Westerners, the very, very bad old days for the Russians. | ||
| The Russians don't want a repeat of the 90s. | ||
| That was traumatic for them, as it would for any country. | ||
| Word on the street is that the current commander-in-chief of Ukrainian forces isn't up for the task of attacking their own nuclear power plant. | ||
| And so Nuland is looking to replace him with Budinov, who will become the next Zelensky if he commits this war crime for the US State Department. | ||
| If these rumors are being considered by Russia, you can expect a major push to take control of Ukraine before it's too late. | ||
| Greg Reese reporting. You can find all the Reese reports at band.video. I think that's gonna be a big story. | ||
| The developments around the world as Joe Biden is still the president of the United States, the weak president. | ||
| So Israel is going to continue to make moves and Ukraine is going to continue to make moves. | ||
| These client states of the United States and then Russia and China, the real deal. | ||
| Geopolitical movers and shakers are going to get stronger out of this. | ||
| By the way, Biden's new angle to get weapons to Ukraine, he says, if we don't give aid to Ukraine, then nobody will. | ||
| Oh, so I guess that's my concern then. | ||
|
unidentified
|
First came Pac-Man, Donkey Kong, and Super Mario Brothers. | |
| And now, the ultimate retro nostalgia throwback game. | ||
| I present to the world Alex Jones's New World Order Wars. | ||
| They're turning the friggin' frogs gay! | ||
| I'll eat your ass! | ||
| You Nazi scum! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's free the patriots and defeat the globalist techniques. | |
| We are going to defeat the globalists very bigly. | ||
| This game is mostly peaceful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm going to lower the world's population. | |
| Oh, Big Bill. | ||
| I'm taking you down, rapist. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I did not have sexual relations with that saxophone. | |
| Download it now at alexjonesgame.com because as we all know, anything badass gets censored! | ||
| Alright, so I'm told nicotine is a cardiogenic. | ||
| In other words, it's bad for your heart. | ||
| But... Let's not pretend Democrats care about your heart. | ||
| They tell you to take the COVID vax. | ||
| Which will make your heart stop. | ||
| So, yeah. | ||
| We're not buying that. | ||
| We're not buying that. | ||
| Alright, ladies and gentlemen. We've just had a new O'Keefe Media Group drop. | ||
| Earlier this week, or it might have been over the weekend, James O'Keefe teased what he says might be his biggest video ever. | ||
| And so many things are aligning right now. | ||
| And our political movement is becoming very populist, very popular, and larger than ever. | ||
| So you have the Carrie Lake tape. | ||
| Where the Republican establishment is attempting to buy her off. | ||
| And now the O'Keefe Media Group has just dropped a tape of political corruption and this guy, a Capitol Hill intern, talking about how they're all bought off. | ||
| So you've got this Capitol Hill intern talking about exactly what was just revealed in the Cary Lake audio leak. | ||
| This is a 20 minute long video. | ||
| The O'Keefe Media Group and James O'Keefe have just shared this on Twitter. | ||
| I want to go to at least some of this to get an idea of what he's talking about. | ||
| It's hard to say what the biggest video O'Keefe has ever produced is. | ||
| There's so many. But here's a Capitol Hill intern talking about the very corruption that just got exposed in the Kerry Lake video. | ||
| I mean, talk about the stars aligning. | ||
| Talk about timing. There's the tweet posted by James O'Keefe moments ago. | ||
| A Capitol Hill intern reveals how members of Congress are coerced to vote a certain way through blackmail and extortion after affairs and sex parties. | ||
| Madison Cawthorn was right. | ||
| Let's go to a little bit of this video. | ||
| Let's get a taste of it here from James O'Keefe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Guys, go ahead. Hey, you're not like, you're not a Trump fan already. | |
| No. Donald needs to die. | ||
| Donald needs to die. Huh? | ||
| I said, well, then Donald needs to go. | ||
| The majority of the work that I do is policy because that's what my degree is in. | ||
| Policy? It's focused in policy. | ||
| And so I do a lot of, that's why I go to a lot of embassies and a lot of events at the White House. | ||
| That sounds, you're in the White House? | ||
| I go to the White House. No, I'm okay if you keep your mouth kind of shut. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is hilarious. If you're working for a Republican, you can't say. | |
| Well, I don't give. I really give it to myself. | ||
| So you're like besties with Nancy Pelosi? | ||
| I love Nancy Pelosi. My picture of Nancy Pelosi and I is on my desk. | ||
| Now, you know what, pause it real quick. | ||
| Pause it real quick. I'm sorry to do this because my art actually kind of breaks with this. | ||
| I don't know. You know, it's funny. | ||
| People will give me a hard time. | ||
| My own dear mother will give me a hard time because I say retard on air. | ||
| But the truth is I actually have an extreme soft spot in my heart for people that actually have mental problems. | ||
| And for people who actually might have some cognitive issues. | ||
| I had friends with those problems growing up. | ||
| I had neighbors like that. | ||
| So I actually have an extreme soft spot. | ||
| I mean an extreme soft spot in my heart and my soul for people that actually do have mental impairment and cognitive issues. | ||
| And clearly this guy probably has something wrong. | ||
| I mean, I'm not trying to be rude here, but I mean, this guy probably has some form of mental impairment or a disorder or something. | ||
| And this is who the Democrats recruit, folks. | ||
| And it really, it just breaks my heart because this poor guy's probably got a pure heart. | ||
| He's probably not a bad person. | ||
| But he gets taken advantage of by liberal psychos. | ||
| And now he's going to be part of one of the biggest exposures of political corruption in DC ever. | ||
| And he's just about to get broadsided by this. | ||
| And it kind of sucks. | ||
| But that's what's going on here. | ||
| And I'm not surprised that so many times... | ||
| I mean, I see it when I go out to the Democrat events. | ||
| So many of the people that they have working for them and activists for them are people that are mentally impaired or have some sort of a cognition issue. | ||
| And it hurts because you don't want to aggressively go after these people. | ||
| They're not bad people. They've just been taken advantage of. | ||
| And I seem to think that that's the case here. | ||
| And it's just the nature of these demons that operate in D.C. and that control the Democrat Party. | ||
| Alright, go ahead with the video. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Know that though, huh? Do they be kissed off? | |
| They don't care. If they do, they kiss the crack of my ass. | ||
| There's a lot of things that I do hear, and there's a lot of things that I see with my own eyes. | ||
| That's the parts of one-line music. | ||
| That meant in a wheelchair that the video that came out was the guy who was sitting in the office building in the hearing room. | ||
| Oh, yes, I saw that. | ||
| Okay. The guy was blackmailed. | ||
| He was blackmailed? | ||
| Pretty much. Whoa. | ||
| So, most members They actually have spouses when they're married. | ||
| They have affairs with other council people, congress people, members, getting off. | ||
| And they have parties and stuff. | ||
| I can tell you about sex parties. | ||
| Yeah, they want to talk a lot. | ||
| So these parties are like, it gets hot and heavy. | ||
| Yeah. It's like an in-house thing. | ||
| As you know, you know. | ||
| If you don't, you don't. | ||
| But not everybody in there knows. | ||
| But they actually, that is a fact. | ||
| They actually do have these parties. | ||
| Does that happen a lot? | ||
| Like people do something sexual and they blackmail? | ||
| Have you seen that? What if they get blackmailed? | ||
| Exactly. Holy shit. | ||
| Because it's like they have a leverage of it. | ||
| Like, if you have something like that, it's called leverage. | ||
| And so what they do, they need to get something else. | ||
| The majority of the members that come away from always 9 out of 10 times come over from a night before. | ||
| From a sex party. So, on the voting, you already have a piece of paper that tells you how to vote. | ||
| It's known as a suggestion. | ||
| It's not a suggestion. | ||
| It's what we need you to vote. | ||
| Because we know we have information about you. | ||
| Right. They have a group chat that they tell people how to vote. | ||
| So, okay. They tell people how to vote. | ||
| Yeah, this is huge. The Democrats or whoever this guy interns for is going to come out and insult this guy. | ||
| I guarantee it. | ||
| They're going to come out and say something negative about this guy or he's lying. | ||
| You know, it's funny. It's funny because Democrats love to use people like this. | ||
| And then sometimes God has other plans. | ||
| So Titus Warren, a Capitol Hill intern that freaks in D.C. wanted to use and take advantage of, it turns out he's going to be used as a tool to expose corruption. | ||
| I hope he sees it that way. | ||
| But my guess is there's going to be statements made and insults made and he'll probably lose his job and he'll be very upset about that. | ||
| But there you go, the latest from O'Keefe Media Group. | ||
| I mean, how do you even put this into a perspective other than just telling it like it is? | ||
| I mean, Madison Cawthorn told it like it is. | ||
| Titus Warren tells it like it is. | ||
| It's funny because there used to be talks around here, and they didn't last long, but there used to be talks around here where Alex was like, hey, you should just go work in D.C. And I was like, yeah, how about hell no? | ||
| Because, folks, I mean, even the small time that I've spent in D.C. with the crew, I mean, even I've been subjected to some of this crap. | ||
| But when you're smart, you identify it, like, immediately. | ||
| Like, oh yeah, that hot chick that's saying, hey, come over for an orgy. | ||
| Like, oh yeah, you're not working for somebody, obviously. | ||
| Like, no thank you. | ||
| I mean, I've even had bartenders that I get to know down there, and when they know someone's coming in that's a shark, they're like, Troyer, get out of here. | ||
| So, I mean, it's well known in D.C., but it's all about to come out. | ||
| So good, here it goes. Blow the doors open. | ||
| All right, we got some other news I want to cover here before... | ||
| My guest in studio joins me, former FBI agent on the latest January 6th news with a statement, a legal statement from Ray Epps, the mystery of Kamala Harris's true whereabouts on January 6th, why the Democrats are erasing evidence so the Republicans can't see it on January 6th, and then of course the pipe bomber mystery. | ||
| Let's try to put some of these other odds and ends out before we do that, though. | ||
| Let's go here. | ||
| Remember yesterday, Joe Biden made the joke that didn't land about Terry McAuliffe being the real governor of Virginia, I guess insinuating that there was election fraud and Youngkin didn't actually win when we know how he won. | ||
| And this is the vehicle Republicans need to use. | ||
| The reason why Yuncken beat McAuliffe is because he got out into the counties and the counties | ||
| were so overrun with Republican votes that the blue areas, the metropolitan areas, the | ||
| voter fraud that goes down couldn't overwhelm all the votes in the counties, in the rural | ||
| areas. | ||
| That's the path to victory for Republicans. | ||
| You can overwhelm the Democrat corruption in the inner cities, in the major metropolitan | ||
| areas by having people get out and vote in the rural areas. | ||
| But nonetheless, Peter Doocy asks if this is funny now to Joe Biden in clip six. | ||
| Is election denying a joke now? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you mean you have to say more than just make a random statement? | |
| Why did the president say, hello Virginia, and the real governor, Terry McCaulough? | ||
| He was making a joke about Terry. | ||
| He was making a joke. I mean, if you play it back, it's clearly that the president was making a joke. | ||
| What's the joke? He was making a joke about McCaulough's previous term as governor. | ||
| How are you guys going to convince people, though, that this idea of denying election results is very bad if President Biden is going out and making jokes like this? | ||
| He did not deny. He did not deny it. | ||
| He congratulated Governor Youngkin. | ||
| Matter of fact, when he won his election, he did it out of the gate. | ||
| Out of the gate. Really, truly, he congratulated the governor. | ||
| And not only that, we've had opportunities to work closely with the governor over the past couple of years. | ||
| And, you know, this is a president that works across the aisle. | ||
| We've seen that many times. | ||
| And he was making a joke. | ||
| So they can joke. But see, that may have been a joke. | ||
| I'll accept that as a joke. | ||
| I think it was a joke. But what about when they tried to stop Bush from getting certified and said that it was stolen from Al Gore? | ||
| What about when they tried to derail Donald Trump's campaign and said it was stolen by the Russians when it was Hillary Clinton? | ||
| What about Bush again versus John Kerry? | ||
| So the Democrats actually do deny elections all the time. | ||
| Stacey Abrams. The list goes on and on. | ||
| They weren't joking about that, by the way. | ||
| Alright, some other odds and ends. | ||
| The Ohio legislature has voted against Governor DeWine's HB 86 veto. | ||
| Transgender mutilation is banned for minors and males are now banned from women's sports in Ohio. | ||
| So, the Ohio governor... | ||
| Tried to make it legal to genitally mutilate children and have men competing against women. | ||
| And it was, I mean, just a massive override. | ||
| 65 to 28 in the Ohio House, 23 to 9 in the Ohio Senate. | ||
| So there's DeWine, another rhino, Republican in name only. | ||
| Plenty of those out there aren't there. | ||
| NBC News is going after libs of TikTok's Shia Rychik. | ||
| And so this is why what the left does is so dangerous. | ||
| Here's the NBC News story. | ||
| Libs of TikTok creator accused of inspiring school board bomb threats named to Oklahoma Library Board, a far-right influencer. | ||
| Now again, who is the Libs of TikTok? | ||
| All she does is take videos of liberals on TikTok and publishes them or republishes them. | ||
| That's it. So they hate their own reflection. | ||
| A far-right influencer who was accused of instigating bomb threats last year against a school library in Tulsa has been named an advisor to a state library committee, the head of Oklahoma State Department of Education says. | ||
| So they don't like that Shia Rychik is taking political action and having victories. | ||
| But here's why it's so dangerous. | ||
| They call in, liberals call in bomb threats and they pose as conservatives so that they can blame people like Shia Rychik. | ||
| That's what they do. It's called a false flag. | ||
| They do it all the time. | ||
| Like Jussie Smollett. | ||
| And then they write a story and they say, see, these people are dangerous. | ||
| They have to be censored. They have to be arrested when they run the entire thing. | ||
| And all Libs of TikTok does is repost videos of liberals. | ||
| That's it. So why don't these people want the world seeing what they promote to kids? | ||
| Because they know if you see what they promote to kids, you'll be disgusted. | ||
| Maybe a little confused, like this individual is. | ||
| Try to keep up here. | ||
| Try to keep up. Trans man who had mastectomy discovered to be five months pregnant. | ||
| Uh... Making rare seahorse dad. | ||
| When did the seahorse come into play? | ||
| A transgender man who underwent a mastectomy while transitioning was found to be five months pregnant. | ||
| Alright, I can't. | ||
| These people. These people. | ||
| Here's one for you. Ex-nude art performer Sue's mama staff turned a blind eye, allowed patrons to fondle his genitals on multiple occasions. | ||
| Oh, do you know whose exhibit this was? | ||
| John Bonifade argues in the suit filed in Manhattan on Monday that his genitals were fondled by five different men on seven different occasions at an exhibit called Marina Abramovich. | ||
| The artist is present in 2010. | ||
| Marina Abramovich. | ||
| But that's part of the art exhibit. | ||
| That's what she's going to argue. Rape and molestation is part of the art exhibit. | ||
| Come on, John! Don't you know? | ||
| That's what it's all about. | ||
| That's what Marina Abramovich does for art. | ||
| So, yeah, you signed up to be part of a Marina Abramovich art. | ||
| What did you expect? Well, he's suing her now. | ||
| Or suing MoMA. | ||
| Yeah, these people are freaks. | ||
| Remember the Democrat emails about Marina Abramovich spirit cooking? | ||
| Yeah, that was fun. | ||
| We all remember that. | ||
| Santo Mayorkas, the Democrat cult. | ||
| Department of Homeland Security employees worship secretary with votif candles for liberal grants of paid time off from work. | ||
| But they just love Mayorkas because... | ||
| Republicans are trying to impeach him. | ||
| So that's what it is. They don't really know anything about Mayorkas or why they love him. | ||
| They just know that, oh, Republicans don't like him? | ||
| Oh, they're trying to impeach him? Then we love him. | ||
| Because they're driven by hatred. | ||
| Not logic or reasoning or common sense or anything. | ||
| Just raw hatred. | ||
| Carrie Lake made this statement about the upcoming election in 24 and the issue of the vote integrity. | ||
| What do you think about this from Carrie Lake in clip 13? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Real quickly, if President Trump wins Arizona, he wins the presidency. | |
| If you win Arizona, we win the Senate. | ||
| Walk me through how you're going to win and help President Trump win Arizona. | ||
| Well, we're going to win by getting out the vote. | ||
| And the vote showed up in 2016. | ||
| It showed up in 2020. | ||
| And it's going to show up even bigger in 2024. | ||
| The people are so tired of what we're seeing at our border. | ||
| Somebody said to me, if they're just going to steal it again, Do you think if they could steal it the same way that they would be trying to arrest and indict and stop President Trump, do you think if they were really comfortable in their steal that they would be able to, that they would be suing me right now, trying to shut me up? You know, there's a reason that they're trying to throw all of these, lob all of these bombs at us, and it's because they can't. | ||
| They can't stop the people. | ||
| The people are awake, the people are fed up, and the people are going to show up. | ||
| So we're just going to get out and out-campaign everybody else like we did last time, and we're going to make sure that every single ballot that's sent to a home is filled in and sent back, and then we're going to get people to show up as well at the polls on Election Day to vote for President Trump. | ||
| I think it's interesting. I think it'll be interesting to see. | ||
| I think the strategy is you get people out in the counties and the rural areas to try to outpace the voter fraud in the metropolitan areas, not to mention just the sheer popularity of Donald Trump and the populism movement behind him. | ||
| But yet the issue of the vote integrity and the voter fraud is obviously still very real. | ||
| So I kind of agree and disagree to a point. | ||
| But there's going to be so much that happens between now and then that who knows what the playing field is even going to look like. | ||
| I mean, we know what they did with COVID to use mail-in voter fraud, but that's been identified now, and there's going to be even more eyes on the polls for 2024. | ||
| All right, we've got Kyle Serafin in studio with us for this hour. | ||
| Very excited. We're going to get into the January 6th pipe bomber, the Democrats deleting evidence, Kamala Harris' whereabouts, the new videos, and the weird response. | ||
| But I wanted, Kyle, to comment on something first because, in fact, you just broke news to me right when you sat down. | ||
| I want you to break it to the audience in a second. | ||
| But you were one of the original whistleblowers talking about how the FBI was targeting Catholics in particular. | ||
| Here's what Speaker Mike Johnson had to say about that, and then we're going to get Kyle's response. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here it is in Clip 8. You were on the Judiciary and the Weaponization Committee. | |
| You know, during that time in the Weaponization Committee, we saw the FBI bring case against the Catholic Church, even putting agents inside of local churches. | ||
| What more can Congress do to prevent this? | ||
| Well, Congress has a very important responsibility of oversight, and we have to bring accountability for agencies that have been spun out of control. | ||
| Really, we use the term weaponized because that's exactly what it is. | ||
| We have agencies that were designed to protect and serve the American people in so many cases in recent years and by the administration have been turned against them, and that's just what the facts show. | ||
| It's alarming. So we've called it out, we've drawn attention to it, and we're demanding accountability for those who are in charge. | ||
| Okay, so Kyle, you were part of the original team of FBI whistleblowers that brought this to the attention of the American people. | ||
| Many testified in front of Congress. | ||
| Speaker Johnson says we're taking action, accountability. | ||
| Do you think that's really going on or do you think there needs to be more? | ||
| Well, there definitely needs to be more. It's not happening yet. | ||
| But we are building momentum. | ||
| You and I were talking just before we get on here. | ||
| You know, the momentum is building. | ||
| It has to be. Because they just keep getting hit in the mouth over and over again. | ||
| The Bureau and the brand of the Bureau is just taking overwhelming incoming. | ||
| And what do you do with that other than at some point people are going to have to go, you know what? | ||
| I mean, I have agents reach out to me, and they say things like, the work that I do is good. | ||
| And I'm not mad at them for that. | ||
| And they're doing things like working on transnational organized crime and whatever else. | ||
| But this agency is irredeemable. | ||
| And that's a really, really tough thing to hear for someone who's on the back end of the last 10 years of their career, and they're looking at what they've been doing for the last decade and change, and then just go like, how can I be associated with this? | ||
| They're going to have to tell their kids that at some point. | ||
| And some people are going to, probably at the front end of their career, are going to realize, this is not what I signed up for. | ||
| Well, and we've had whistleblowers like yourself and others go in front of Congress. | ||
| I suspect there's going to be... | ||
| I don't know if more whistleblowers coming forward or it's going to be people leaving the Bureau, but you were actually just telling me that there was kind of a troll that just happened at the Capitol. | ||
| Yeah, that's right. So I work with a group that's called Catholic Vote, which is an advocacy group, and they've got a 501c3 and a C4 and some other things. | ||
| And they picked up right away on the problem of the FBI investigating Catholics. | ||
| That's what they do. | ||
| And they're lay people, they're not associated with the church. | ||
| They're just regular people that go to mass. | ||
| And so they said, okay, well, if the FBI has got a problem with Latin mass | ||
| and they think they're gonna call that analogous to white supremacy, | ||
| why don't we get a Latin mass said in the Capitol for the first time in history? | ||
| And so they did that yesterday on the one year anniversary of that memo | ||
| being sent out into the field in Richmond. | ||
| So, there is pushback happening and people are getting more bold. | ||
| I think that the big difference is historically, people were scared of the FBI, right? | ||
| They either had sort of a respect or they were scared and they were looking around and they're going like, | ||
| this is an agency or institution that's either fearful or they actually just think it's got some vestigial history | ||
| that we think is good. | ||
| I think we're moving to the point where people are going, you guys are acting like clowns. | ||
| We're gonna treat you like clowns. | ||
| We're going to troll you like anybody else. | ||
| You're not off limits. So gloves are off for some of these people, and I'm proud that they got that done. | ||
| The masks look lovely, by the way, so that's cool. | ||
| But also the fact that what it says is like, we're not going to be kowtowing to you. | ||
| We're going to actually do the thing that you said we shouldn't do. | ||
| Well, and I think maybe there's kind of been a turn in the spirit of being afraid, let's say, of the FBI to being afraid that if we don't push back against the corruption, not just from the FBI, but the entire Biden administration or federal government at large, that that's going to be much worse than if we sit back and say, oh, we're afraid. | ||
| Kyle Serafin in studio. You're not going to want to miss this next segment, folks. | ||
| Share the links. This is going to be huge. We are getting crushed in the housing market. | ||
| We are getting crushed in the automobile market. | ||
| We are getting crushed in our grocery bills. | ||
| They're sitting here attacking you, attacking your economy, attacking your culture, attacking your borders. | ||
| And then they say you're inhumane. | ||
|
unidentified
|
War. | |
| And they say you're inhumane. | ||
| We have Kyle Serafin in studio, former FBI agent turned whistleblower and now doing his own podcast and working with a lot of great whistleblowers as well out of the FBI to try to expose some of the corruption going on internally. | ||
| But I wanted to have him in studio today and get some of his expertise From his time at the FBI in response to what we've seen with the latest January 6th developments, and I've got quite a few here. | ||
| We've got the situation with the new pipe bomb footage. | ||
| We've got the situation with now Ray Epps' testimony that has just gone public. | ||
| As well as this whole Kamala Harris mystery about where she was really at on January 6th. | ||
| She was in a meeting. | ||
| Well, she says she was in a meeting, which of course makes sense. | ||
| She's supposed to be voting for the certification of the votes, but she's in a meeting. | ||
| She's at the DNC. Oh no, she's at the Capitol. | ||
| They keep changing their stories. | ||
| But before we get into the Kamala Harris angle, because that'll spin nicely off the pipe bomb situation. | ||
| And in fact, guys, I forgot to send you that footage. | ||
| Let's go ahead and pull up that footage that just got released. | ||
| From the pipe bomb. Okay, so we have new footage thanks to Thomas Massey's office that got released. | ||
| Revolver News, Darren Beattie released it. | ||
| I'm sure you've gone through it yourself. | ||
| And so I just want to kind of get your just base level response to the footage where you have an individual who goes over to, this is Kamala Harris' detail, a Metro Police vehicle with three police inside and then a Secret Service vehicle. | ||
| I think there were two Secret Service agents inside is what it appeared. | ||
| This is Kamala Harris' detail at the DNC where they originally lied and didn't tell anybody that she was there. | ||
| And this guy, who apparently is a Capitol Police officer, who's not in uniform, identifies the pipe bomb, goes and alerts Harris' detail. | ||
| And this is probably the craziest part of it, and then I want you to go into your response to this. | ||
| He goes and he tells the law enforcement Secret Service detail that there's a pipe bomb over there, and then he walks right back in front of it! | ||
| I mean, what? You think there's a bomb? | ||
| And then you're going to walk right back in front of it? | ||
| So Kyle, watching this as we play it on the screen, what is your response to this as a former FBI agent that obviously knows what crime scenes look like, what responses look like? | ||
| What is your response here? The attitude, the lackadaisical sort of response to this is wild. | ||
| It's truly wild and it can lead you one of basically two possibilities, right? | ||
| Possibility one, massive incompetence. | ||
| You have no idea what to do. | ||
| You're shell-shocked. I just saw this thing that looks like a bomb. | ||
| What happens next? That's one possibility. | ||
| The other possibility is I was already told it's not a real bomb. | ||
| I'm going to behave very casually. | ||
| So you're either incompetent or you're sort of informed and you're working, doing something that makes no sense unless you knew more information. | ||
| And I think it's fair to say that those are the only two conclusions you can reach at this point. | ||
| And I would say you might get that. | ||
| I'll never rule out incompetence. | ||
| I worked for the federal government. People get shell-shocked by all kinds of things. | ||
| We would call it vapor lock when you're doing training. | ||
| Something would happen that is outside the boundaries of what you're prepared to respond to. | ||
| And that's a possibility. And then you go, what the hell do I do? | ||
| But I would lean into that a bit and I would say... | ||
| I don't think that's Secret Service, though. | ||
| Maybe police? More importantly, they had already found another bomb. | ||
| They had already set up a safe zone. | ||
| They had already done a crime scene and a cordon of minimum safe distances to be able to deal with the one that was at the RNC. So this is not like it's an unexpected possibility. | ||
| it's pipe bomb number two of the day, in a day that had exactly two pipe bombs | ||
| and a city that had exactly two pipe bombs for like the last year that I'm aware of. | ||
| So it's not like it's a common thing and then suddenly this is top of mind awareness to you. | ||
| So, okay, so it takes them five minutes to even set up a perimeter. | ||
| They were finishing their sandwiches. | ||
| Is that an official statement? | ||
| So my buddy who's now working with The Blaze, he'd been an independent journalist at the time. | ||
| This is Steve Baker. | ||
| He went through hundreds of hours of footage to get this. | ||
| And I knew this the night before January 6th. | ||
| I actually flew up to give a speech up in Long Island. | ||
| And so he had told me, we're sitting face to face. | ||
| And he goes, look, this is not public yet, but I've spent all this time. | ||
| Not only did he uncover that it was the plainclothes police officer that was part of the U.S. Capitol Police, but he also said, I've seen the footage and they're working on sandwiches. | ||
| And they finish the sandwiches. That's not a joke. | ||
| No, I'm not saying that as a sly remark. | ||
| I'm saying the guy supposedly finished sandwiches after being told, hey man, there's an explosive device within 15 feet of you. | ||
| Now, was the Capitol Police officer off duty? | ||
| That I don't know. So I think that's one of the questions that remains. | ||
| Either way, it was a Capitol Police officer, plainclothes, alerts them. | ||
| They say, I've got to finish my sandwich. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| And I don't care if you're off duty or on duty. | ||
| If you carry a badge, you have an instinct to protect. | ||
| That's why you signed it. Yeah, of course. | ||
| You're not going to let little kids walk by a possible pipe bomb. | ||
| Well, even he walks right in front of it again. | ||
| Now, here, tell me if I'm crazy, because I don't hear anybody else saying this. | ||
| They do mention this. When the camera moves over, this is after five minutes of nothing. | ||
| When the camera moves over, there appears to be a fresh coffee cup sitting on the bench. | ||
| Now, this might be me getting a little crazy. | ||
| Could that have been, like, a sign? | ||
| Like, somebody put that there and, like, tip it over, like, okay, that's the sign, like, now we go into action? | ||
| I don't know, because how do you sit on the bench and not see it? | ||
| We'd have to totally speculate on that. | ||
| The other possibility is, is who's sitting there? | ||
| Right. How did you get a sweep? | ||
| Of a Secret Service detail coming in with dogs and everything else. | ||
| How did you miss this pretty obvious thing you can almost see on the camera? | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's not like it's buried. | ||
| It's sitting atop part of it on... | ||
| Yeah, so when he walks back over, he's taking that iconic picture with his cell phone that we've all seen on social media and that's gone out and, you know, that's been the picture that people associate with the pipe bomb. | ||
| That's where it came from. That was him walking back in front of supposedly a live explosive device. | ||
| Didn't seem too concerned. | ||
| Generally not advised. | ||
| Yeah, didn't seem too concerned. | ||
| It's not like he was part of the bomb squad. | ||
| He's not suited up. Yeah, we didn't see any protective gear. | ||
| Mm-hmm. Okay. Now, because we're trying to put all the pieces here, and I don't have as much investigative experience as you, but okay, I'm just looking at this from a layperson that has common sense. | ||
| If you're taking five minutes to respond to this, like you said, you're either criminally negligent or you have some form of information to know there's no reason to panic at this point. | ||
| Well, if that's the case, let's say now let's lean into the latter. | ||
| If they already knew that that was not a real bomb and it was part of something else, they, because look, folks, they make mistakes too. | ||
| I mean, this is a tough, believe me, let's say this was a total Fed surrection. | ||
| That's a tough thing to pull off. | ||
| I mean, this is not an easy operation for them to have all these moving parts and pull it off. | ||
| I think that, you know, they can make mistakes too. | ||
| So they might have moved too soon. | ||
| The identifier of the pipe bomb might have moved 30 minutes too soon or whatever because he wasn't supposed to notify them until 1.40, which was supposed to be the 20-minute mark until the certification, which was supposed to be when the timer said when the bomb was supposed to go off. | ||
| So that's why they might have been sitting in their cars finishing their hoagies is because they were like, hey, we're not supposed to move yet, right? | ||
| We're not supposed to move yet. And then they're like, well, now he's just called it in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now we have to move. It's always, like, this is the problem. | |
| When we don't have a federal government that's being transparent and honest with us, we're completely left to speculation. | ||
| The other problem is, is that we have an awful lot of coincidences that don't seem to line up. | ||
| Like, how come we can't find the cell phone data on this, right? | ||
| The cell phone data was supposedly, they did a geofence. | ||
| They were able to find every single person that went into the building. | ||
| They can find people with an earlobe. | ||
| Right. Yes, of course. | ||
| They can identify people with the earlobe recognition, even though he's wearing a mask or whatever, all this kind of stuff. | ||
| And then we can't find the one person in the least crowded time at night, right, doing the single most terroristic act on supposedly the darkest day in our nation's history. | ||
| On multiple cameras. Correct. | ||
| How can we not track that person? | ||
| And then we hear from Steve D'Antuano, who is the former assistant director in charge of the Washington field office, who was my boss's boss's boss or something to that effect. | ||
| He was a couple of levels above. He was the guy in charge of the field office. | ||
| Was that the same guy that was in the Whitmer case? | ||
| Oh, weird. Isn't that weird? Yeah, yeah. He originally had the fake Whitmer kidnapping plot, and then he gets moved to this. | ||
| Right. So he was in Detroit. | ||
| He was the special agent in charge there. | ||
| We had a last minute, you know, low notice retirement of the ADIC in front of him, the assistant director in charge at Washington Field. | ||
| So DeAntuano gets that job. | ||
| Now he's in. Now he's in charge of what ends up being January 6th. | ||
| I guess if you're the master of entrapment, you bring him in for this operation. | ||
| I think it's worth being fair to people because we can be as conspiratorial and I don't think he's a good agent. | ||
| I don't think he did a good job and I have some personal beef with him for some stuff he did to some friends of mine. | ||
| So I'm not real partial to that. | ||
| But in fairness, the person at the top of the food chain for all the FBI offices, they generally don't know what's going on with all of the cases at all the times. | ||
| They're not running those cases daily. | ||
| Sure, there's like 20,000 agents or more, and I'm sure even more cases. | ||
| So there's, yeah, there's a couple thousand cases being worked out of that field office. | ||
| But let's be also really clear. | ||
| Isn't it interesting that when you have Chris Wray out there, I don't know, I can't recall, I don't remember, I don't have that information, maybe we can get back to you, Congressman. | ||
| All that is always pretty common. | ||
| It feels like they do that on purpose, where they're compartmentalized to the point where these people don't actually know anything, or they're at least, they're saying that, and nobody could prove otherwise, because they're not cracking FBI files. | ||
| Well, look, and they do know, and I happen to have some... | ||
| I happen to have some intimate information because of my litigation dealing with this and some of the attorneys I've spoken with, which, I mean, it would have been off the record, but Clay Higgins and some other members of Congress basically made it public so I can talk about it now. | ||
| They argued, the federal government argued in some of these cases that there were so many confidential informants in the ground that to make a request to give them a number would be impossible. | ||
| That was their response. | ||
| They said... Defense teams would say, hey, well, how many confidential informants did you have? | ||
| And they would say, well, we don't have the answer. | ||
| The judge would say, okay, we'll get the answer. | ||
| They'd come back in court and they'd say, well, the number is so high, we can't give it to you. | ||
| And so now Clay Higgins and others have come out and they've said they believe it was at least 300 agents, either confidential informants or directly in the federal agencies, were on the ground that day. | ||
| Let's take the conspiracy out of it for people because there's really, really obvious reasons why that would be. | ||
| It doesn't make it good. | ||
| It just makes it so we can make it more tangible, right? | ||
| Every single field office has a counterterrorism mission, all right? | ||
| There's either a GS-15 or there's an SES that's in charge of counterterrorism. | ||
| That's what they do. | ||
| And all of them are running cases. | ||
| There's 56 field offices for the FBI. | ||
| So they're all running cases in their area. | ||
| And that could be in Iowa, and there's gonna be some in New York. | ||
| There's gonna be some in Miami, et cetera, et cetera. | ||
| Everywhere you go, the FBI is working counterterrorism cases. | ||
| They all have a quota, which should probably not surprise people at this point, | ||
| but that's true. | ||
| And then based on the number of cases they open in certain types and the way that they're worked and the techniques that they use, whether this be a Title III wiretap or using FISA or using physical surveillance or so on, they're incentivized with a bonus structure that pays out the top person in that field office to the tune of like $30,000 to $50,000 a year. | ||
| So there's an incentive and a quota margin that... | ||
| It's like the old argument. Well, if I have to give out 50 speeding tickets a month, but nobody's speeding, well, then what am I going to do? | ||
| Yeah, you're going to find some speeders. That's what's going to happen. | ||
| So in this case, the FBI is incentivized because of the system that they use, and that's been going on for a little while now, this stats-based system. | ||
| They call them statistical accomplishments. | ||
| But because that's been going on for a while, every one of those 56 field offices is incentivized to have people infiltrated into various types of groups that are going to generate certain types of cases. | ||
| In this case, there are 266 cases, which I'm sure there's one on you. | ||
| There's definitely one on me. | ||
| We all have this sort of thing going on. | ||
| These are intelligence-based cases. | ||
| They're not criminal, by the way. | ||
| They're intelligence for counterterrorism because you are an anti-government, | ||
| anti-authority, violent extremist, or you are a militia violent extremist, | ||
| or you're a white supremacist, whatever. | ||
| They have all these different labels on them. | ||
| But what they do is they go and they create these cases. | ||
| They get sources into them because they need sources for that accomplishment. | ||
| And then when those sources travel to January 6th, we found out just after January 6th, | ||
| We're following a guy and we don't know what he did, but they were like, oh, he was involved | ||
| So we're following him. That's what we did. That was my team. | ||
| My team was a surveillance team. So here we are outside of this thing, and what happens? | ||
| He gets into his car. He starts driving home at like 10 o'clock at night from Loudoun County. | ||
| And we followed him. We followed him all the way through Maryland, first all the way through Virginia, then through Maryland, then into West Virginia. | ||
| We're like six hours deep into this surveillance. | ||
| Right? It's in the middle of the night. | ||
| The guy's exhausted. We could tell. | ||
| We actually had him pulled over because he was weaving between lanes. | ||
| And I thought he was going to kill the kids in the backseat. | ||
| So, you know, life first. | ||
| And so we get this done. | ||
| We find out. We're good to go. | ||
| So the fact that they don't have a good number means that they would have to go through every single case, every single source, and find out if all those sources who reported maybe not being there because they got scared, they'd have to figure out all the things. | ||
| It's possible they can't even get that number. | ||
| And I'm sure 300 is, like, that's not crazy to me. | ||
| That's three per office. | ||
| That's nothing. And I think, too, it just shows you that there was an overwhelming, not just presence of federal agents or confidential informants there, but there was an overwhelming incentive to be there and be involved, whether that was nefarious. | ||
| For nefarious reasons or for surveillance reasons or for any other reasons. | ||
| But I think what we learned, too, and this is why the fake plot to kidnap the governor, I think, is so important. | ||
| And then there was the... I forget what it is. | ||
| It was another FBI... The Newburgh. | ||
| Yeah, the Newburgh Four, where they just released the final guy from that, and the judge excoriated the FBI for their entrapment. | ||
| The judge said the major conspirator in that case was the federal government. | ||
| Well, but that's... See, that's the big development here, where... | ||
| Okay, there's clearly an incentive with these cases for federal agents to provocateur these events. | ||
| Why wouldn't we suspect that could have happened on January 6th? | ||
| So it's not just that there's an incentive. | ||
| It's a well-established playbook. | ||
| Okay? And interestingly enough, and this is an opportunity for people in your audience to reach across the aisle. | ||
| I keep telling people that's one of the things I say on my podcast all the time. | ||
| Go meet your neighbors. They're not your enemy, it turns out. | ||
| The enemy is actually the game. | ||
| It's not the people that are in it. | ||
| And your neighbors are not your enemies. | ||
| They can actually get behind this. | ||
| Because there's a guy named Trevor Aronson, and he wrote a book called The Terror Factory, which I'll recommend to you and recommend to the audience. | ||
| It's over 10 years old. | ||
| And the story was, post 9-11, there was a massive push to go after Muslims in this country, some of whom were justifiable, but they ran out of them. | ||
| When you run out of justifiable cases, you do exactly what's been going on in the last couple years on people that are in the, let's call it, patriot movement that the government will brand as anti-authority or anti-government types. | ||
| When you have that motivation, you take exactly the same thing. | ||
| And what you do is you find people that have low IQ or they have low finances. | ||
| They're down on their luck. | ||
| They're in a bad spot. We're just describing Gretchen Whitmer really easily. | ||
| But it's the same thing for all these others. | ||
| And then you offer them an opportunity from someone who is a friend. | ||
| And that friend is either an FBI asset, what we call a confidential human source, or it's an FBI agent. | ||
| And when that person asks you to do something... | ||
| Then you do it. Why? Because you don't want to let your friend down. | ||
| And if that means you've got to plant a bomb and get some money and you guys have this great plan worked out and you found some financers and we're going to get some money from ISIS or Al-Qaeda or whoever it is, it just turns out all that money comes from the federal government and all the fake bombs come from the federal government and all the capabilities of doing the plot come from the federal government. | ||
| And so that's what this judge just said, is that none of this could have happened without the furtherance of the FBI. It's not seen as entrapment because as long as that agent or that CHS gives you an opportunity to say no, They're like, look, are you sure you really want to do this? | ||
| And you go, yeah, man, I'm in. | ||
| The minute that happens, they've basically said, well, now we're not entrapping them because we gave an opportunity to say no. | ||
| But the person was saying no to their friend, an undercover or an asset. | ||
| Which could be their only friend. It could be their only friend group. | ||
| Most likely is their only friend. Yeah. | ||
| Most likely is. And so how much work, though, goes into... | ||
| Identifying or using some sort of a dragnet to find those people, or is it just it works out that those are the individuals that kind of gravitate towards them? | ||
| These are targets of opportunity, right? | ||
| So there is a net, of course, there's a net, and the net is usually online. | ||
| It's basically like go troll through the Reddit forums, go on 4chan or 8chan or whatever it is that people are on saying things that are dumb. | ||
| And basically, and I've said this multiple times, it's my favorite kind of thing, but it's like any time that you find somebody who agrees with all your worst ideas, especially your violent ones, and they're willing to help you carry them out for the exact amount of money that you have because they already looked into your bank account and they know what you can afford, that's a Fed. | ||
| That's what that is. That's a Fed. | ||
| That's either an informant or it is an agent that is working, and they're going to always introduce you to somebody that's going to be able to help you out. | ||
| There's always a bomb expert or a weapons guy or somebody else. | ||
| That's the undercover. | ||
| The undercover comes in and does this thing. | ||
| And it's like, if you have no other outreach to society because you are living in a basement | ||
| and you don't have a pot to piss in, literally, like the guys did in the Whitmer case, | ||
| that's what we're talking about. | ||
| We're talking about people- Or you already have some sort of a mental issue | ||
| or you're on drugs. | ||
| There's tons of that, autistic kids. | ||
| We've seen 16 year olds that have been literally baited for two years until they're the age of majority | ||
| where they can go, oh, now you're 18. | ||
| Now we're gonna talk you into flying into Jordan to go fight for ISIS or something crazy. | ||
| And that's what we did. | ||
| They did that too. | ||
| That was a recent story that just went viral. | ||
| These aren't made up. These are real world examples. | ||
| And they happen over and over again. And unfortunately, the terror factory, it's just been applied. | ||
| So I think my disagreement with Trevor Aronson, I've told him this on the phone, my disagreement is that he thinks it's because of racial animus. | ||
| That it's about black and brown people. | ||
| But it's not. It's just about people that generate statistical accomplishments. | ||
| Well, like you said, once they ran out of Muslims to target, what are you going to do? | ||
| It reminds me, and this was kind of, you know, people said that this was political commentary at the end of Dark Knight, if you recall, when he's got the big sonar system, and then after he finishes using it to catch the Joker, he destroys it, right? | ||
| And the whole message was, okay... | ||
| Whatever. Use the system to find the bad guys, but then you get rid of the system. | ||
| You don't keep using it to find innocent people after that. | ||
| Right. But, okay. | ||
| With three minutes left until the break here. | ||
| So what conclusions, if any, or what assumptions, if any, would you leap to after seeing the pipe bomb footage, the response with the background we already have, your background in investigating, where do you go as far as what you think happened? | ||
| I'm not sure that I've even gotten that deep into it. | ||
| I kind of am focused on what, you know, what do we know and what specifics can we keep piecing together? | ||
| We never have proof positive. | ||
| That's the thing. We have evidence of certain things. | ||
| And there's some evidence that would suggest that this is like a plan me, right? | ||
| That either people go into the Capitol because they're being incited to or because they're interested in their own volition or they made that plan somewhere else. | ||
| Some good actors, some people that like some people did some dumb things that day. | ||
| We have to agree on that. Some people probably go to jail for punching cops. | ||
| That's okay, too. I don't feel comfortable saying that the guys that got into fights with cops that picked that fight are totally without blame. | ||
| However, what's going on in the background where we have a Capitol Police officer who's seen a bomb, allegedly, then acts really gentle about it and is not freaking out, and then nobody seems to act like it's a real bomb? | ||
| We've already found another bomb somewhere else. | ||
| They did the right thing. They set up that perimeter. | ||
| So we can only be led to believe that this was part of somebody's plan. | ||
| God knows what the plan was, right? | ||
| Kamala Harris was in there. Why is Kamala Harris not crowing to the hilltops that I was almost a victim and everybody is racist? | ||
| Why did that Capitol Police officer not get an award for his bravery and his heroism for taking a picture of that bomb and finding it and spotting it and his eagle eyes save the life of the future vice president? | ||
| Why did none of that stuff happen? | ||
| So we have more questions than we have answers, but they lead us down a particular road, and they're shutting off some of the other roads. | ||
| And it leads down to, like, is this a plan B? This is something that Thomas Massey brought up. | ||
| Was it a potential diversion? Was it meant to sucker in more Capitol Police resources? | ||
| You know, it doesn't matter what the real answer ends up being, other than we're not being told the truth. | ||
| So it's one more log on the fire that says we have a federal government that's lying to us, and they are basically building. | ||
| And here's what I think really was going on. | ||
| I think that everybody that's been arrested for January 6th, with very few exceptions, were arrested on criminal complaints. | ||
| And those criminal complaints are incredibly broad. | ||
| They say all the things that happened on those days to include found explosives, which sounds really scary if you're reading them. | ||
| And the judge, who's the magistrate judge who has to sign off on the arrest warrant, They're seeing, oh, well, there were bombs involved. | ||
| There was a riot. You know, now everybody knows it. | ||
| But when they were first signing these things out, they were talking about how there was explosive devices. | ||
| That ups the ante when you start putting in the weapons of mass destruction kind of thing. | ||
| There were explosives that were indiscriminate weapons. | ||
| That moves the needle at the beginning, at least, to start really going after these people more aggressively than would otherwise make sense for, like, let's say, a misdemeanor trespassing charge, which people got. | ||
| Well, I want to get more into the timeline because I never really thought of it like a plan B, but now that you say that, I could actually see this because I have a pretty good idea of the timeline of how this all worked out and including not just the entrapment of the people that were there at the Capitol when the breach happened, when Ray Epps is standing there and others, but I mean, there could be a theory here that they were trying to entrap us as well, but I'll get that on the other side of the break with Kyle Serafin in studio, FBI whistleblower, don't go anywhere. | ||
| Share this broadcast with friends and family, and we'll be right back. | ||
| All right, so we're having a great conversation off air, but... | ||
| He's putting different thoughts are churning in my mind, too, because, you know, the best plans of mice and men can go array. | ||
| I mean, I was explaining, and we'll get into the timetable of this, I was explaining to Kyle Howe, I mean, even our plans for that day basically kind of got thrown to the wind. | ||
| And you don't even work for the government. | ||
| I hope I never work for the government. | ||
| I might be the government's bitch, but that's a different story. | ||
| So we were basically delayed like an hour in our approach to the Capitol. | ||
| And if we would have been on time, it felt like we were kind of being set up. | ||
| It felt like the federal agencies were trying to set us up and lead us to the Capitol when | ||
| the barricades were getting broken down. | ||
| But because even, you know, even we're discombobulated and discoordinated so many times with our | ||
| security and then somebody's got to go to the bathroom and then Alex wants to do this | ||
| or I want to do this, but security says we need to do this. | ||
| We were like an hour or so delayed from even going to the Capitol that day. | ||
| So, I mean, even we were kind of discombobulated, and thank God for it. | ||
| Otherwise, we might have been walking up when Ray Epps and the others were right there when the barricades were going down. | ||
| And so, you know, maybe the federal government kind of has a problem as far as their organization is concerned. | ||
| But let's get into the timeline here. | ||
| So... Two o'clock is when the certification is supposed to happen. | ||
| Kamala is supposed to be there voting. | ||
| This is the biggest day of her life, right? | ||
| You'd think that she'd want to be there. What is she doing at the DNC unless there was some alternative agenda there with the bomb sitting outside, right? | ||
| So maybe it's a plan B to draw officers away from the Capitol. | ||
| Because I was thinking too, when we were there in November, which I think that one, legitimately the November march | ||
| might have surprised people. | ||
| I mean, we were stunned at how many people were in DC in November. | ||
| I mean, hundreds of thousands. | ||
| I mean, it was an incredible day. | ||
| But with the Trump event, everybody knew there was going to be at least half a million people | ||
| there. | ||
| I mean, that was obvious. | ||
| It was going to be a huge day. | ||
| Well, that's the big thing. | ||
| It was pre-planned, right? | ||
| There was plenty of advance notice. | ||
| There were permitted events. | ||
| That's a big difference than a spontaneous protest that happens out of nowhere, which, by the way, | ||
| happened like every week or two in Washington, DC. | ||
| So we were stunned, though, because we were in front of the Supreme Court building, and there was literally no security. | ||
| Like, there was just a barricade set up, and there were some people kind of grumbling like, hey, let's take the Supreme Court building. | ||
| Let's take the Supreme Court building. And I was like, no, no, no, don't do that. | ||
| Don't go over the barricades. Don't go over the barricades. | ||
| I mean, nobody really talks about that, but since you bring that up, I figured I would. | ||
| But so anyway, so talk about, okay, is it a plan B? Is it meant to draw assets away from the Capitol in case they couldn't get people to breach? | ||
| It could be any of them. So let's rewind it just a little further back. | ||
| You talk about planned versus unplanned. | ||
| When you have planned events, that gets into the territory of what we call the NSSE, which I kind of told you a little bit about. | ||
| And I'm going to give it to you as straight as possible. | ||
| NSSE, as my recollection, it stands for National Special Security Event. | ||
| The FBI's Washington field office has a whole squad that deals with this. | ||
| Like, that's all they do, is national events. | ||
| They plan for it. Now imagine anybody, if you have the Super Bowl come to your town, that's an NSSE. If you have the State of the Union, which happens every single year, it's an NSSE. Okay, and the way that it works is, is that by statute and by policy, the Secret Service is the lead agency. | ||
| Whenever you have, like, a bunch of things going on, a bunch of law enforcement, a bunch of government agencies, you need someone to take the lead. | ||
| Secret Service has the lead for all NSSEs. | ||
| All you do is declare, this is an NSSE, And then it's game on. | ||
| Then we roll out a plan. And the plan equals unlimited overtime for the locals. | ||
| They love it. It's good. So DC Metro PD, everybody can be on staff. | ||
| You can sit on a bag and have your riot gear. | ||
| Or you can be in the riot. | ||
| You still get paid. So that's really good. | ||
| The local SWAT teams that are going to come in and help, that's the same thing. | ||
| Response and so on. Every single asset gets put into play because this is a national special security event. | ||
| And that's how we do it. So you've got FBI teams that are going to be in plainclothes. | ||
| I've done this before. I was there for Trump's inauguration. | ||
| In plain clothes, walking around, looking for Antifa, and found him, and actually arrested an Antifa guy. | ||
| So that happens all the time. | ||
| Then we have what's called I-teams. | ||
| These are investigative teams. These are two agents that are dressed like this, and they go out and they do the interview after the so-called undercover or the covert surveillance guys are seeing the bad actors, people that are infringing on First Amendment liberties. | ||
| We deploy some resources. | ||
| The Department of Energy is out there sweeping for dirty bombs and stuff. | ||
| You've got the dive team from the FBI is out on boats. | ||
| They're looking at all the bridges to make sure nobody does anything terroristy. | ||
| So all of these things roll out. | ||
| And you use them and it's not a big deal. | ||
| You just go, okay, this is a special security event because this is a big deal. | ||
| And we want to make sure all the assets are in play. | ||
| We didn't see the National Guard, right? | ||
| I know Cash Patel has talked about that quite a bit. | ||
| And we didn't see an NSSE declared. | ||
| I've never heard anyone say why. | ||
| That's news to me. Now, we do now know that Trump did look for extra security that day. | ||
| That's on record. It was stood down Capitol Police. | ||
| It was stood down National Guard. | ||
| But this is another angle I've never heard of. | ||
| This is the normal protocol. This happens, like I said, happens multiple times a year. | ||
| So it's not that 4th of July, big parades. | ||
| You set up all your resources. | ||
| If that was the case, and I was on leave on January 6th, I was up in Maryland doing a shooting course. | ||
| But if I wasn't, because it was an NSSE, I would have been sitting at the Park Police Headquarters, what they call the Eagle Nest. | ||
| I would have been sitting there next to the helicopter with my team, ready to task out on somebody who's bad who needs to be watched. | ||
| That was my job at the time. | ||
| We would have had six to eight armed agents that would deploy out and we would follow bad guys or, you know, potential terrorists or whatever. | ||
| That was our gig. We didn't get deployed on that. | ||
| I was able to take leave. Usually it's like a leave is canceled thing. | ||
| Anybody who's been in the military knows what those, you know, sort of everybody is on call. | ||
| And that didn't happen. And why that didn't happen is still beyond me. | ||
| Like I said, I've never heard it answered properly. | ||
| This should have been something that the Secret Service declared and they did not. | ||
| Well, okay. All these open questions. | ||
| That also tells you why you had so little resources. | ||
| So the plan B, which we're getting to, You have a plan B option where you've already got low resources because you haven't got everybody on standby. | ||
| Now let's say you've got a bomb. | ||
| Well, what's the priority of people who are protesting outside of a place where there's permitted stuff and a bomb? | ||
| Or two bombs. You go to the bombs, right? | ||
| You've got to set up minimum safe distances. | ||
| You've got to set up probably a 300-foot possible blast radius where everybody can be safe. | ||
| You evacuate all the areas. | ||
| You've got to go door-to-door and make sure nobody's near a window. | ||
| You've got to bring in a bomb squad. | ||
| Like that's a lot of resources. | ||
| People are stopping traffic in every area. | ||
| So if you do a plan B that draws a bunch of people away, what does it leave? | ||
| It leaves your other place vulnerable. | ||
| So the concept of a plan B, that if they don't get rowdy here at the Capitol, | ||
| which is, we're speculating 100%, but if you don't get rowdy at the Capitol | ||
| and we wanna give people a reason that they can think that they can do it, | ||
| you talked about the Supreme Court having open doors. | ||
| They had one set of barricades and nobody was there. | ||
| Nobody. | ||
| It was stunning. | ||
| And you think you could have got up to the doors? | ||
| Oh, easily. People were suggesting we do it. | ||
| And I remember it. | ||
| It was a beautiful day in November. | ||
| Nobody was expecting the event to get that big. | ||
| And it ended up being huge. | ||
| And we're standing there at the Supreme Court, basically getting smashed into these barriers. | ||
| And I think some people were just like, we need room to breathe. | ||
| Like, let's just move the barriers so we can expand. | ||
| We can't breathe here. And Alex was like, no, no, don't get rid of the barriers. | ||
| We can't go over the barriers. And I remember it like it was yesterday. | ||
| I can hear that. Here's the crazier thing. | ||
| Because the permits... | ||
| Because Alex and some other individuals worked together to get permits to have speaking events that day. | ||
| So we had a permanent event on... | ||
| I don't remember what side of the Capitol. | ||
| We'll just say... Let's just say northeast side of the Capitol, whatever it was. | ||
| We had a permit and a stage set up. | ||
| And part of the conversation leading up to that was, is it going to be worth it? | ||
| Because these are expensive things. | ||
| I mean, to get these permits and get these stages set up, it's very expensive. | ||
| So part of the debate was, well... | ||
| Is it gonna be worth it? | ||
| Are there gonna be people there that day? | ||
| And it was pretty much determined immediately like, oh no, this is gonna be a big event. | ||
| There's gonna be hundreds of thousands of people there. | ||
| It'll be worth it to get this stage set up and have these speakers. | ||
| So it was like, okay, green light it. | ||
| So it wasn't like they didn't expect that, especially once Trump announced that he was gonna have his speaking event. | ||
| But you know what? I just had another thing come to mind. | ||
| And I haven't heard anybody talk about this yet. | ||
| It just shows that the whole pipe bomb thing was clearly a false flag. | ||
| Who puts a pipe bomb in visibility under a park bench? | ||
| Nobody. It doesn't even make sense! | ||
| Oh, look, we got it up on the screen over here where you can kind of see what it is, but like... | ||
| Well, it's like somebody went to the FBI training headquarters and just pulled it right out of there. | ||
| It looks like every training bomb that's ever been put out there. | ||
| Have you seen those before? Not with the FBI. I saw them when I was in the military. | ||
| But the idea of having a dummy IED... Improvise explosive device. | ||
| They're everywhere. Anytime you do explosives training, it's like this is the most basic rudimentary level. | ||
| What do you need? You need a casing that also has some fragmentation capabilities. | ||
| You need an explosive thing. | ||
| You need an initiator, whether it's electric or non-electric. | ||
| So that's a fuse or it's going to be a battery that hits a blasting cap or something to start it. | ||
| And then you need some way to initiate it either remotely or you're going to trigger it by hand. | ||
| You'd still have to be in the area to do that. | ||
| I mean, it's not like it's going to have a large... | ||
| So command wire is one way you can do it. | ||
| So you actually push a button or whatever. | ||
| You initiate a charge. | ||
| Then you can do it remotely with cell phones and stuff like that. | ||
| The people who are overseas saw this all the time. | ||
| And then the other possibility is that you have it on a timer. | ||
| Now, timer is the least precise way of doing it. | ||
| It's also the easiest thing to set up is like, here's how it could look. | ||
| And do those egg timers have 24 hours of capability? | ||
| Okay, I'm just making sure. I didn't think so. | ||
| But the way it was described to us, because the first thing that happened, because my team, my surveillance team, was put on this case. | ||
| And when I say that, I mean, we weren't doing the ground investigative work. | ||
| We were doing the out in the field, running down the leads, and following someone that was a person of interest at the time, of which I've never heard anything about it again. | ||
| But consider the person of interest. | ||
| The first thing you want to know, if you are a surveillance agent, you're armed, you're going after a potential bomber, what do you want to know? | ||
| Were the bombs real? Were they operational? | ||
| And the answer pointing at the... | ||
| At the driveway, if you will, or the entryway to the underground parking garage. | ||
| So we don't actually have camera footage of that particular little park bench for days beforehand. | ||
| And my buddy Steve Baker said he went back and he went back five, six days and nobody had moved the camera. | ||
| It had been pointed right at where those cars were, where the guys were eating the sandwiches, which you just showed earlier. | ||
| That had been unmoved for several days. | ||
| And then suddenly, for the first time, after they start doing this investigation where they slowly get out after the sandwich eating... | ||
| Five minutes after it's called, yeah. | ||
| That's when it starts moving for the first time in days. | ||
| Now... Who knows? I have a hard time believing that there is not another camera angle that has that bench in it. | ||
| We're talking about D.C., the most surveilled area probably in the United States, and outside of the DNC. I mean, that's my opinion. | ||
| Do you think that there's any other footage out there, potentially? | ||
| There may be, and I'm not at liberty to discuss whether or not it's coming forward or not, but people should hold onto their hats for the next couple days. | ||
| Fair enough. Well, I've always figured, too, being in the position I'm in as a journalist, people will sometimes tell me what to expect or what's coming, and sometimes I'll tip off my audience a little bit. | ||
| I did not have that knowledge. | ||
| That was an assumption. I think a pretty safe one to make. | ||
| But what's incredible, okay, so considering that, Now we get into some of the facts that the Democrats are trying to hide the evidence. | ||
| Okay, so the Democrats delete 100 whatever files off of this January 6th committee, 100 files of evidence. | ||
| I guess it was 117 to be exact. | ||
| And then the Republicans, after they take over, are able to save it with some data people. | ||
| And then they find out it's encrypted, but Benny Thompson won't turn over the passwords. | ||
| Now, as a general observation here, which I think should raise the ire of every American... | ||
| It's the Democrats, it's the January 6th committee, and it's their friends in the media that have been obsessed with January 6th and the narratives that they're trying to bring to the fore with January 6th. | ||
| Why are they the ones erasing evidence, and why are they the ones not talking about the pipe bomber? | ||
| You don't have to respond to that, but talk about this deletion of evidence that the January 6th committee has been caught. | ||
| Well, it's really straightforward, right? | ||
| Didn't Nancy Pelosi kind of let that slip? | ||
| She said, we've got to keep the January 6th narrative alive. | ||
| She used the word narrative. | ||
| Not the truth. Not we've got to find out what happened. | ||
| They've got a particular sort of brand of story that they've sold. | ||
| And if you're deleting information, like I struggle with the idea that anybody does that in an honest way. | ||
| Well, I mean, if you're working in a courtroom and that happens, your case is blown. | ||
| You're getting held in contempt and now you've got other charges you're looking at. | ||
| Yeah, so you could go from being the investigator to being the investigatee to being investigated for doing that sort of game. | ||
| You can't go screwing around with information. | ||
| And this is the thing that's been so troubling, I guess. | ||
| This is the narrative that should be pushed by honest people, political left or right. | ||
| I actually don't care about any of that, if we get right down to it. | ||
| Bill Shipley, who's been defending J6ers and doing his thing, and I like Bill, and he's fair, and he said something that I think is the most honest statement about all this. | ||
| The government should be agnostic about the outcome of court cases. | ||
| That's not a win for the government. | ||
| If the system works the way that we like to believe that it would, idealistically though it may be, it's supposed to be agnostic, and your job as an investigator is to uncover the closest thing you can to the truth. | ||
| You probably are never going to get to the whole truth, but you want to get as much of it as you can. | ||
| Whether that is incriminating or exculpatory is irrelevant. | ||
| You find the information and then the facts land where they may. | ||
| And then the prosecutor presents the case to the best of their ability. | ||
| And the defense does the same to obfuscate or whatever else. | ||
| And then a jury of your peers, people who are supposed to actually be your peers, are supposed to listen to it. | ||
| And then they decide you met the burden under the standard pattern jury instructions or not. | ||
| And based on that, we're going to go forward and give you our verdict. | ||
| That's how our system is designed to work. | ||
| It basically comes from people who are in good conscience and of good heart are going to try to play their role as we just described. | ||
| None of those things are happening right now. | ||
| You've got a jury where people are actually fighting to get on. | ||
| So they can be on the jury, right? | ||
| We've got prosecutors who are trying to get wins. | ||
| They're trying to notch W's. | ||
| That's ridiculous. You've got agents that don't know, don't remember, or are not actually looking at all the information and they're letting things go in a very half-assed and lazy way. | ||
| Well, let me ask you this quickly. Let me ask you this quickly. | ||
| Is there an incentive either directly at the FBI or that you've heard of in any of these bureaucracies? | ||
| Let's say you do the bidding of the party that's in control. | ||
| Let's say you do the bidding of the Democrats. | ||
| Is that a way to climb the ladder? | ||
| It's nothing so explicit as that. | ||
| And I've never made any more money by either making or not making a case. | ||
| You know, like, there's just not that. | ||
| Like, nobody cares. If you do a good job, if you do something over and above, maybe you get a bonus or something like that. | ||
| But generally speaking, no. | ||
| But everybody who's ever worked in law enforcement knows if you build a big case and the big case gets a lot of notoriety and your boss gets a lot of attaboys for it, then you might have somebody who's willing to help you get to the next level if you want that. | ||
| The problem is the best case agents in the FBI have no interest in management. | ||
| None of them. Like, the culture is the opposite of that. | ||
| They despise management. Like, that's the funniest thing about this is it's almost like the same thing in the military where the enlisted people kind of look at the officers a little bit kind of askance and they're like, nah, you're officers, you don't work for a living. | ||
| Case agents look at management and go, I'm a case agent. | ||
| I want to do investigations. | ||
| That's why I came here. I don't know what it is you're doing. | ||
| You don't even need a gun anymore. You're not even doing that job. | ||
| You forgot the weight of a loaded gun. | ||
| Correct. Yeah, well, that's a good joke about it. | ||
| Most of them don't carry a gun to begin with, so let's be real. | ||
| They actually started off not carrying a gun, so they never even knew what it was. | ||
| But a lot of this management types, they're not interested in the same kind of investigative culture. | ||
| And so, yeah, if you want to climb, if you want to make a move, you've got to build a big case. | ||
| There are people that build cases in their first three years. | ||
| They coast for 17 years after that until they retire. | ||
| And they tell everybody about that big... | ||
| It's like fish stories. Like, oh yeah, well, you know, I worked that big case. | ||
| They'll literally fly you around the FBI to brief your case you did 10 years ago. | ||
| I had cases briefed to me multiple times by the same person in multiple different venues because that guy was on a speaking tour about a case he did 10 years ago. | ||
| And you're like, who cares? So is that some of the incentive we see with the January 6th investigations? | ||
| I think the scary thing about January 6th was that, and this comes from friends who were, like, in the command post at that time, on that day. | ||
| They said, this is our 9-11. | ||
| This is what we're going to build our careers on. | ||
| So the management decided that. | ||
| The narrative was something that was co-aligned. | ||
| It's almost never, like, a real good, like, Cancer Man-style X-Files conspiracy where everybody gets in the room and they all smoke, you know, and they don't turn on the lights for some reason. | ||
| They figure out what the nefarious plot is. | ||
| It's almost always a bunch of... It's pretty cinematic. | ||
| It sounds good. I mean, it looks beautiful. | ||
| Like, we want to see it, right? But in reality, I think more often than not, what it is is a bunch of people with co-aligned interests. | ||
| It's like, I want to move up. | ||
| I need to move this political ball. | ||
| It's a bunch of people that never conspired together, but they all had the same goals. | ||
| The goal just sort of We're good to go. | ||
| And you didn't see people getting arrested. | ||
| You didn't see geofence warrants getting dropped. | ||
| You didn't see people getting run down for misdemeanor trespassing who just happened to be on the lawn. | ||
| That didn't happen. So when you see fundamentally different treatment of people, it looks like an agenda. | ||
| That's what it looks like. Well, it's obvious. | ||
| And like I said... | ||
| side of that courtroom when you have that realization at a personal level it | ||
| hits home a lot differently not just the fact that justice was never even brought | ||
| into the equation but that no there's there was already a predetermined | ||
| outcome of this case before you even stepped foot in this room. You never had a chance. | ||
| I don't think they have a chance. | ||
| I mean, I look at all these J6 stuff, and like I said, even some people probably do belong going to jail for some of the stuff they did, but only if it was the same sort of thing. | ||
| The other thing that nobody talks about, most of the stuff should have been brought in what's called the, not the district court of D.C. It should have been brought in the superior court of D.C., which is where all kind of trespassing and window breaking and punching somebody goes. | ||
| You don't generally bring it into district court. | ||
| Without standing on the steps. Yeah, generally that wouldn't even, you know. | ||
| Standing on the steps? It's embarrassing. It's embarrassing on every level. | ||
| Interesting. But that being said, I did bring you this. | ||
| Yeah, yeah, yeah. So first of all, the suspendables, that's the team you're with, FBI whistleblowers, great people. | ||
| You've got a website. I imagine there's maybe some other FBI whistleblowers that might want to join you, but you brought me a gift. | ||
| I brought you a gift. So we gave you one last time, which was the white pin. | ||
| People, if you see me wearing that white S pin, that was a gift from you probably like three or so months ago. | ||
| Yeah, just before you went in. Right, yeah. | ||
| Now we got the dark mode version. | ||
| This is the elite level. | ||
| I've now reached an elite level. | ||
| We allowed people to buy the white ones as a show of solidarity with what we were doing, and so that's really cool. | ||
| A lot of people have gone out and bought them, and they're wearing them on their lapels. | ||
| It's a great conversation starter. | ||
| People are like, your hand's upside down. | ||
| You're like, no, that's how it's worn. The eagle is down, is what we say. | ||
| But anyway, the eagle is down. | ||
| You can only earn these. The blacks are not for sale. | ||
| Those are meant to be worn by people who have done something. | ||
| Well, thank God the blacks aren't for sale, because we have all kinds of... | ||
| You'd have all kinds of problems if that was for sale. | ||
| Well, this is awesome. Every time I wear that pen, somebody sends me a message about how sharp it looks. | ||
| This one is even sharper. It's like dark mode, or the subdued version, if you will. | ||
| This is kind of a little bit lower viz, but it'll look good on some of your suits. | ||
| And what's the website? | ||
| Because you guys got great apparel there, too. | ||
| So this is supporting Garrett O'Boyle, who testified in front of Congress, big guy, long hair, my very good friend, his name, and the website is the-suspendables.com. | ||
| There's t-shirts there, there's merch there, there's patches, but the pins are kind of the biggest seller. | ||
| People can pick up like a three-pack of those and get free shipping on them, and it's... | ||
| Support our FBI whistleblowers, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| There it is. It's great apparel. | ||
| Here's my pen. It's a great honor. | ||
| I'm going to be wearing this on air, and I really appreciate all of our great FBI whistleblowers, including my guest, Kyle Serafin. | ||
| All right, ladies and gentlemen, that does it for the InfoWars War Room 21-hour break. | ||
| We'll see you tomorrow. You stay classy, InfoWarriors. | ||
| Anybody that's paid attention to InfoWars and what we do knows we're at the center of the zeitgeist. | ||
| We literally beat ourselves to death to be as accurate as we can, unlike the corporate-controlled dinosaur media that lies on purpose. | ||
| While they're lying to you about today's news, we're telling you the truth about what's coming next. | ||
| So I am fully focused. | ||
| I'm being as accurate and researched and truthful as I can and letting the chips fall where they may. | ||
| So when I bring you a product, and all our products are incredible, and I tell you it's game-changing, and quite frankly, you should be careful. | ||
| You can take it to the bank. | ||
| I want you Particularly those on the fence that never got a product at InfoWarsStore.com to go to InfoWarsStore.com and I want you to get foundational energy. | ||
| You can take X2, the cleanest iodine out there, goes right in your cells, takes two wings to kick in on average, and then you're sold. | ||
| And it's great. And it's same level as this with cellular function. | ||
| But this is the missing link. | ||
| This is the breakdown product. | ||
| Most people's cells have problems doing it. | ||
| Some people have major problems doing it. | ||
| But methylfolate is the breakdown of folic acid. | ||
| And then you give it B-Complex that's organic. | ||
| It supercharges it like nitrous oxide in a funny car or a drag racer. | ||
| So this is already all the rage on the cellulomethyl. | ||
| Folate. But this has the B-Complex. | ||
| It's the highest quality and it funds the Infowar. | ||
| So you can buy methylfolate somewhere else and it's great. | ||
| But this funds the Infowar so it's a 360 win. | ||
| Get your foundational energy and experience it and be careful. | ||
| Only take one at first. I took one today. | ||
| I'm climbing the walls for the last 10 hours. | ||
| I'm shooting this ad at night. | ||
| I mean, it's not a stimulant, folks. | ||
| It's cellular energy. | ||
| You add stuff like TurboForce or X2 or stuff to this, it's crazy. |
Export Selection