Greg Reese and Mike Adams warn of a "Great Awakening" disrupting Klaus Schwab’s 2020 cyberattack fears, framing depopulation schemes as active threats. Adams ties Big Pharma’s censorship to Bayer’s Nazi-era IG Farben roots, claiming COVID-19 "vaccines" killed 20M but failed due to immune resilience. Chase Geiser attacks Civil War as election-year propaganda, mocks Harvard’s Claudine Gay plagiarism scandal, and links Tafari Campbell’s drowning—without a life jacket in near-darkness—to Clinton-era "political killings." He exposes NATO’s Ukraine war escalation, predicts a Zelenskyy coup, and ties U.S. debt hikes to globalist insider trading. The episode ends with a call to fund InfoWars’ resistance via The Great Awakening book and merchandise, framing the fight as humanity’s last stand against systemic control. [Automatically generated summary]
To the frightening scenario of a comprehensive cyber attack, which would bring to a complete halt to the power supply, transportation, hospital services, our society as a whole.
The COVID-19 crisis would be seen in this respect as a small disturbance in comparison to a major cyber attack.
You can see here the Great Awakening orbiting the Great Reset.
Although the depopulation systems of the Great Reset are not yet fully operational, the Great Reset does have a strong conspiracy network.
Download and Share Videos00:04:18
unidentified
It is protected by a satanic shield which can be disabled by the Great Awakening.
The Great Reset must be deactivated if any victory for humanity is to be accomplished.
Once the Great Awakening deactivates the shield, Infowars.com forward slash show will cover the truth, while Infowarriors fly into the superstructure and attempt to knock out the Great Reset.
Alex Jones has volunteered to lead the fighter attack.
Get a signed copy of the Great Awakening today at Infowarsstore.com.
If you are an American receiving this transmission, you are free.
Well, certainly there are those who are more responsible than others.
They will be held to conquer.
But again, truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.
I know why you did it.
I know you were afraid.
Couldn't be. War, terror, disease.
There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt you.
No reason, and rock you of your common sense.
Fear got the best fear, and in a new panic you turned to the now High Chancellor, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent.
But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, together we shall give them a fifth of November that shall never, ever be fought.
unidentified
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next.
I started back in 2003, so I've been doing this for 20 years.
I started writing about nutrition and health and using healing foods and so on.
I was really just focused on nutrition and health for many years.
And then eventually, when you start going down that rabbit hole, you realize that, hey,
there are a lot of so-called authoritative sources out there that are trying to keep
people sick in order to have more profits for big pharma and the sick care industry.
So eventually you're going to clash with that, which I did.
And I started getting a lot of censorship, but also expanding my knowledge about governments
and corporations and the real agenda.
And I would say about maybe 15 years ago or so, I first came here as a guest with Alex
And ever since then, I've been a repeated guest and host.
I've done fill-in hosting for Alex quite a lot over the years.
And of course, I have my own studio and platforms and everything else, but I'm always thrilled to be here.
And I always find that I do the best shows right here with Alex because I have that back and forth.
Alex always apologizes for interrupting, but I actually think it's really good because it keeps you on your toes, and it's a really good dialogue with him.
So I think we just did a great show, and I'm thrilled to be here with you to do another great show with you.
Oh well actually it was over 20 years ago I was borderline type 2 diabetic and I was borderline obese and I was suffering from chronic back pain and major health problems at a relatively young age and I learned that sugar was a toxin.
High fructose corn syrup.
And believe it or not, that was not common knowledge at that time.
And so I learned about sugar, I took sugar out of my diet, stopped drinking sodas and so on, and then all of a sudden everything got better.
How much of that goes back to World War II? I know the farmers, agriculture was huge during World War II. We were shipping a lot of supplies and food to the soldiers.
Then the war suddenly ended.
Yeah. Does that coincide with high fructose corn syrup just suddenly being put into everything?
Yeah. Well, I guess it was around that time that more processed foods really came into existence because it was about also having long shelf life preservatives in the foods.
But what you've got to understand is that before World War II, there were no synthetic pesticides and herbicides that were used on any crops.
I mean, so people were essentially eating organic, even though it wasn't called organic.
And so that's one of the reasons why our grandparents or great-grandparents tended to have much better health.
You know, they had better stamina, they had better longevity, they had better cognition and so on.
They were just more active and they weren't getting exposed to all these chemicals.
But today, we're inundated with these chemicals unless you take special steps to avoid them, which I do.
You saw my crazy smoothie here.
I always have this. Looks delicious.
Yeah, doesn't it, though? But this is, I don't know if this is on camera, but yeah, this is avocados.
I'm almost done. This is my breakfast and lunch.
This is avocados and flax seeds.
There's an overhead shot.
I know, it looks gross, but it's also got spirulina.
Well they were infecting hemophiliacs with HIV and hepatitis in the 80s for years.
And I'm a type A severe hemophiliac.
Oh, really? I know people.
My doctor, all of his patients died in the 80s.
I was lucky enough that I was born almost on the other, just right on the other side of the threshold of the medicine being contaminated.
I was born in 1990. But from like 83 or 82 to 85, even when Fauci was involved at the NIH, they knew that the blood products, the medicine, was contaminated with hepatitis and HIV. Yeah.
I think 10,000 hemophiliacs died.
Their mothers injected them with AIDS and they didn't even know it.
Yeah, but the genocide isn't completely successful.
So I think they have killed at least 20 million people around the world right now.
But I actually think that weapon failed.
I think they thought it would kill a lot more people.
And it failed for a number of reasons.
Number one... The human immune system is pretty adaptable and more capable than they get credit for.
But secondly, a lot of people learned the truth about things like ivermectin and quercetin and zinc and vitamin D and whatever, and they were able to support healthy immune function, and a lot of people rejected the vaccines.
Right? So, including myself and probably most of the people who work here, and certainly Alex.
But because of that, they have to find different ways now to either starve us or kill us or exterminate us, and that's why there are all these different vectors of depopulation.
And I didn't start out Believing in any kind of depopulation agenda.
That's right. Well, and Pfizer, even, when they're found guilty by the government, because, frankly, every U.S. state has sued the pharmaceutical giants for price-fixing, not even to mention, you know, clinical trial fraud.
Are we going to break here? Oh, yeah, we're going to break in just about...
Well, I'll tell the story on the other side of the break, then.
I wanted to mention that, you know, it's illegal for corporations that have been convicted
of felony crimes to do business with the federal government.
Right.
Well, almost every one of these Big Pharma corporations has been convicted of felony
crimes, by the way, in various ways.
Price fixing is just the beginning of the story.
So what they do, and Pfizer did this, is they have a shell company that they make a sacrificial lamb, a sacrificial corporation, to take the felony charge, right?
So they'll have Pfizer XYZ incorporated in the Cayman Islands or something.
Oh, that one takes the felony charge, and the DOJ agrees to put the felony charge on that corporation.
It's so conglomerated that the government knows that if they can't do business with These three or four big pharma companies, there's nobody to do business with.
Right, exactly. So big pharma is too big to fail in the medical space, kind of like too big to fail in the financial space that you were talking about.
You know, with, well, I guess Goldman Sachs wasn't too big to fail, but, you know, J.P. Morgan is too big to fail, right?
Wells Fargo, too big to fail, and so on.
But what's critical to understand is that These shell companies take the felony charges, and then the main company continues to do the same business and commit the same kind of crimes and the same kind of price fixing.
I mean, I remember what was like a $2 billion DOJ settlement a few years ago with one big pharma company that was caught bribing 40,000 doctors across the country to prescribe its drugs.
It was a massive bribery network.
I covered this in detail.
Well, You know, all these companies are still doing business.
I mean, that was GlaxoSmithKline.
And GSK is still doing business.
How is that possible? After bribing 40,000?
Like, if you bribed 40,000 doctors, you would be in jail.
So how easy, based on your understanding and research in this space, how easy would it be for some of the most chronic illnesses to be permanently solved that just aren't?
Really? Yeah. Actually, in the space where my expertise is, we consider Early cancer to be easily overcome.
Now, I'm not saying that about late stage, you know, stage four, liver cancer, whatever.
Usually by that time, someone has gone through chemotherapy, mass poisoning, their immune system is shot.
And at that point, their options are very, very limited.
But in terms of catching it very early and then using anti-cancer nutrients and anti-cancer lifestyles and avoiding the pro-cancer exposures, which are very easy to do, frankly, if you're willing to change your diet.
That's very straightforward.
And I don't think that almost anybody has to die from cancer.
It can be overcome with all kinds of systems of nutrition and traditional Chinese medicine.
Now, there are things that don't work for cancer, like acupuncture.
Acupuncture is not great for cancer.
It's great for treating infertility, by the way, in women especially.
You know, acupuncture can restore circulation and restore hormonal balance and things like that.
But it's not good with cancer. There are a lot of anti-cancer nutrients.
In fact, you can make them yourself for free by sprouting broccoli seeds.
So there's one nutrient called sulforaphane, which of course has sulfur as part of the molecule.
Sulforaphane is synthesized by broccoli sprouts as they're sprouting.
And so you can actually just go buy broccoli seeds in a mason jar and have some water and a cheesecloth on top with a rubber band and you just rinse it twice a day with water and empty it out and let them sprout.
You're growing anti-cancer medicine.
And then you eat those broccoli sprouts or you put them in a smoothie like I do and you're drinking anti-cancer medicine.
And also it's anti-inflammatory.
It's also neuroprotective to protect cognition, right?
But nobody in big pharma or government wants you to know that you can grow your own anti-cancer molecules for pennies.
That's a really interesting question. Ray Kurzweil is probably a good example of someone who takes a lot of nutritional supplements for the purpose of longevity so he can live long enough to upload himself to the machines.
I'm happy to just live a meaningful life and then go on as God intended.
You know what I'm saying? But I'm talking about quality of life.
So as long as you're here, you don't want to live in pain and you certainly don't want to be...
You know, stuck and immobile, and you also want to have good cognition, good brain function, because otherwise you can't obviously navigate the world around you and everything just becomes overwhelming.
So what I teach is nutrition that does keep you active and healthy, pain-free, but also expressing your greatest self.
So all the things that God put you here to achieve, you can't achieve those if your blood is all toxic.
So, you know, I'm not saying that if you cut off somebody's head that you could regrow your brain, but you can restore and heal neurological tissue.
So if Joe Biden were treated with lion's mane mushroom, he might regain some cognition capabilities and realize that he's An occupier in chief and not the president.
You know, it's a real honor to be able to share all this information with the world.
So, folks, use good nutrition, take care of your mind, your health, and your knowledge, and we can be part of the future success of human civilization.
Thank you so much for coming into the studio and speaking with me.
I know you were on for a long time with Alex Jones.
That was a great episode today.
Make sure you guys check that out at band.video after this broadcast is over.
And stick with us because we will be covering all the news on the other side, back to the war room, and taking calls in the third hour as well.
In the meantime, visit Infowarsstore.com and be the reason we are still on the air.
Welcome to the War Room, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, your host this evening.
What an awesome segment that we just had.
What a great guest.
Mike Adams, ladies and gentlemen.
Phenomenal person to speak with.
I had a lot of fun. That was the first time I ever met him.
Really the first time I ever talked to him or studied or explored his work and what he's doing.
Great stuff. And a super nice guy.
Beautiful German shepherd he brought in.
So much news to cover. This is the most...
Content I've ever seen on my desk.
I've done The War Room.
I've done Sunday Night Live.
I've done American Journal a number of times, countless times at this point.
And I've never had so many articles.
And it's crazy because it's not even that big of a news day, but there's just so much miscellaneous random stuff going on as everything just gets more and more intense in this political climate that we're in.
We've got Alex Jones coming back on Twitter, Axe.
We've got InfoWars totally back on Axe.
We've got Elon Musk and Alex Jones doing a Spaces that was astronomical.
Through my account, no less, which was a lot of fun for me.
I got 15,000 followers just because Alex Jones spoke through my account for a couple hours on Sunday.
And we have all this happening while Donald Trump is way ahead in the polls.
It's not even remotely close.
Frankly, it's embarrassing how bad he's winning.
And yet the mainstream media continues to push the likes of Nikki Haley and DeSantis as if there's some major rivalry between the two of them that's going to manifest in some sort of outcome other than Trump.
I've never seen such interest in who's going to get second place in my entire life.
Nobody ever cares about who's going to get second place.
But for some reason, the media just wants to cover DeSantis, Nikki Haley, all the time.
And we're seeing this hypocrisy from the left.
Where they just try to drag everything out.
They did it with the racist accusations where they just drag it out and then everything becomes racist.
And they're doing it with the anti-Semitic stuff now and they're doing it with the sexist stuff.
And every single negative moral feature that one could possibly imagine just gets used and abused and stretched incessantly to the point where it becomes meaningless by the left.
The most recent one was this insurrection on January 6th.
Which, in the eyes of the left, it's as if it's treason to tell the truth about what happened, which was that it was an inside job, and the intelligence community provoked and stoked the flames of passion among some protesters so that they would break the law, and then they were persecuted and prosecuted, some of them sentenced to decades in prison, some of them who weren't even there that day sentenced.
And they used this all as an excuse to do this Hollywood-style investigation.
On Donald Trump, this impeachment inquiry, this January 6th inquiry, this January 6th select committee of the most corrupt people ever.
Basically, imagine what someone would look like if they drank a bottle of formaldehyde And that was exactly how the select committee looked to me.
They broadcast it at prime time for like a week straight.
Maybe it was a couple of weeks straight.
People only watched the first night, but it was just embarrassing how bad they wanted it to blow up, how bad they wanted it to be famous.
This all after they lied incessantly about the Russian collusion hoax.
Adam Schiff even today tweeted something like, oh, there's a new report out that Donald Trump had documents about Russian interference destroyed when he was in the White House.
I just replied and I said, oh, so you're not making it up this time?
Got it. How many times do these people have to lie to us before we realize that they're going to lie to us the next time, that what they're saying to us now is false?
And they're trying to stretch this insurrection so hard, so far, that they're now declaring that MAGA Republicans are a threat to our democracy that right-wing extremism or white supremacy is the greatest threat to national security, despite the fact that 10 million people at least have crossed the border illegally since Joe Biden became president.
Over 70,000 of them apprehended from places of interest, terrorist countries.
And that doesn't count how many got through that we don't even know about.
But we're the greatest threat to national security.
I tell you what, we are a threat to their security.
And I don't mean their physical security.
We don't advocate violence on this platform.
But we are a threat to their established power.
We are a threat to the offices that they hold now, that they seek to hold in perpetuity.
But they're so self-righteous that they claim that anything that's a threat to them is...
A threat to democracy itself or freedom itself.
It's like when Fauci said, I am science.
And they think Donald Trump's deluded.
They think that he's this egotistical, delusional person.
They literally think that they're science and democracy.
And I saw this video today.
We're going to run clip 16. This is Swalwell.
Saying that these motions to impeach Biden for his crimes against the country, which there's substantial evidence for, that these investigations, these impeachment inquiries are an extension of the insurrection on January 6th, which of course we know wasn't really an insurrection.
It was an inside job.
It was a psyop. But listen to him talk about this.
unidentified
16. This impeachment is a continuation of the insurrection that came here on January 6th.
They have never, this gang has never accepted Joe Biden as the president.
And the architect of the idea that you could overturn the election is the current Speaker of the House.
And that Donald Trump Sent that violent mob here.
It didn't work and so now we're here where they're going to try and use this house to overturn the election through this inquiry.
The problem is they have zero evidence.
The only crime is that Joe Biden blew out Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
And that's a problem because this place is the largest law firm in DC with these lawyers working on behalf of just one client.
Donald Trump at the expense of everything else that matters.
But I want to give James Comer some credit because after 50,000 pages of depositions and secret hearings and closed hearings, I think if we give him enough time, he's going to prove that Hunter Biden is Joe Biden's son.
So pathetic. We're going to run clip 30 in a second because he's criticizing the Speaker of the House.
But he wasn't the only one that criticized the Speaker of the House today.
We heard from Bannon regarding the Senate passing the NDAA, sending the bill to the House.
So the Senate voted overwhelmingly Wednesday to pass the fiscal 2024 defense policy bill, setting up the sprawling $886.3 billion National Defense Authorization Act for House consideration Thursday.
Senators adopted the conference report by an 87-13 tally.
The vote came after the legislation cleared a couple of final hurdles, including a Democratic hold on the 3,000-page NDAA conference report in a protest of the bill's four-month extension of a controversial surveillance authority.
When you've allowed the transgender, you've allowed all that garbage, all that demonic trash, throughout the defense budget, you wonder why you can't get kids.
You know, red-blooded American boys and girls to get into the military?
With what you've done in this neo-Marxism and this cultural rot that now you have taxpayers paying for in almost a trillion dollars?
And you allowed this to happen?
When the commitment, the commitment, if you can't get the majority of the majority done, go to the floor of the Hassert Rule.
But you waive that to get this there because you're playing footsie with Mitch McConnell, Schumer, and you're just as bad as the Biden guys.
Because you should know better.
So I don't need to hear any more biblical review, okay?
And frankly, I'm appalled that aid to Ukraine is on the table at all.
We hear our politicians always talk about how important it is to compromise, how important it is to reach across the aisle, how XYZ has bipartisan support as if that's a good thing.
But really, that's just conspiracy.
That's just compromise of integrity and values.
That's selling out whenever they work together, these parties, this uniparty.
And so the fact that he is negotiating, giving money to Ukraine in exchange for better border security for our border is just disgusting to me.
The government should have to do that without any sort of deals or reeling and dealing going on for a foreign war that should have nothing to do with the United States.
More on the other side, folks. Welcome back to the war room, folks.
There's like a cafe vibe going on in the control room tonight.
Okay. Okay.
We're sliding into the segment.
No problem. Sliding into the Civil War.
No problem. So this segment, I want to talk about this new movie coming out.
It's called Civil War, which broke out its first trailer for Alex Garland and A24's tense dystopian epic.
I like the Mashable coverage better than the Forbes coverage, actually.
A24's chilling Civil War trailer sees America tearing itself apart.
And the reason I want to talk about this is because I have mixed feelings about the trailer.
The movie actually looks pretty good, but it's so obviously politically charged.
It's so obviously going to be a propaganda piece that it just leaves sort of a bad taste in my mouth.
But I want to show you this trailer, which is clip 17 here, and then I want to go into some clips that I pulled today, just coincidentally, not connected intentionally, of Klaus Schwab speaking about things like predictive programming.
Prescriptive programming and this anti-system sentiment that the younger generations have he complains about.
But let's run clip 17 and just pay really close attention to this trailer.
Don't think of it from the standpoint of, oh, does that look entertaining?
Think of it from the standpoint of who is making this movie and why are they making it?
What message are they trying to send in an election year?
What are they trying to get us to do as Americans?
Let's go ahead and run it. The United States Army ramps up activity.
unidentified
The White House issued warnings to the Western forces as well as the Florida Alliance.
The three-term president assures the uprising will be dealt with swiftly.
Let me know if you want to try anything.
I'm just aware there's like a pretty huge civil war going on all across America.
We just try to stay out.
with what we see on the news seems like it's for the best.
Citizens of America, the so-called Western forces of Texas and California.
As if Texas and California would ever sign up with one another.
...at the hands of the United States military.
Mr. President, do you regret the use of airstrikes against American citizens?
No! We're moving to D.C. today.
We need to go down there. They shoot journalists outside in the Capitol.
Alright, so there's a lot going on to unpack in that trailer.
First of all, the production looks amazing.
It's got an outstanding A-list cast.
But there's obviously some very intentional messaging going on here.
That makes me uncomfortable. The first thing I notice is that, apparently from the trailer, The hero of the story is a journalist, a young female journalist who's braved so many different war zones and took it for granted that such a thing could happen in this democracy, as I'm sure she would describe it.
That was mentioned in the trailer.
Second thing is this sort of menacing-looking antagonist In that really epic scene where he interrogates them as to what type of America or which type of American they are, is obviously a Second Amendment advocate rogue kind of guy.
So they're setting up anybody who owns an AR-15 or any sort of military rifle as a domestic terrorist.
The third thing is...
There's this president of the United States who is Ron Swanson.
We all think of this guy as a Republican because of his role in Parks and Recreation, where he was like a Republican's Republican.
He's forever embedded as the bacon-loving, leftist-hating, government-hating Ron Swanson.
And so he's in this movie as this sort of Trump right-wing figure.
He's bombing Americans who are attempting to secede.
For some bizarre reason, Texas and California have teamed up in this secession.
And I think the whole purpose of it Is to imply that Donald Trump and right-wing extremists are domestic terrorists.
And to imply that if we elect Donald Trump to the presidency, that we're set to have a civil war like what we see in that movie.
And I always struggle, this is an ancient debate, as to whether or not...
Art makes culture or culture makes art.
So is this movie coming out because it's responding to a zeitgeist or is it coming out because it's trying to create a zeitgeist?
Is it trying to shift the sentiment in the country or is it resonating with an existing sentiment in order to make as much money as possible?
And obviously they scheduled it very intentionally to come out right before a primary election in a major presidential election year.
It comes out in the spring of next year, 2024.
And so it seems to me that they're setting this up intentionally as a sort of propaganda piece to try to get people emotionally to abandon Republicans, Republicanism, Americanism, patriotism as this sort of terrorist activity.
And it lines up perfectly with what Schwab said here in Clip 21.
Let's go ahead and run Clip 21 where he's talking about not just predictive programming, but now he uses the expression prescriptive programming, where they're trying to actually determine what you're going to believe and what you're going to do.
Rather than just predicting what you're going to do so they can surveil you, now they want to determine it with this prescriptive programming in Clip 21.
So they're talking about prescriptive programming.
They're coming out with This epic-looking movie in the spring, right before an election, that's very obviously about very real people and designed to evoke an emotional response conducive to their political agendas' goals.
And then we see this other documentary coming out, and this is going to take us straight to break.
Can we run clip eight, God and Country?
Now they're attacking us for being Christian nationalists.
unidentified
Let's go ahead and run it. America and Christianity are like baseball and apple pie, and we celebrate them together.
We've got these documentaries coming out saying that Christian nationalism is a threat to democracy, a threat to our safety, that it's a terrorist activity, that people are using Christianity as a means to power in this country when our entire culture is very antagonistic to Christianity.
So if you really want to be popular and successful these days, you would think that you would do the opposite, right?
More on the other side, folks. We'll be getting into the weeds with this in the next segment.
Welcome back to the War Room, folks.
I'm Chase Geiser, your host this afternoon.
Keep in mind, folks, it is Friday, which means it's payday for many of you.
It was payday here at InfoWars.
And I'm told that...
Today is the last day that we can guarantee any orders placed at Infowarsstore.com will arrive by Christmas.
Now, if you place orders later, the likelihood that they will arrive by Christmas is very high.
But this is the last day that we know for sure That if you order anything, you'll get it by Christmas.
So if it's payday for you and if you're thinking about getting gifts for yourself, friends, and family for Christmas, make sure you visit infowarsstore.com right now in order today to ensure that you're guaranteed to have those products at your door in time for the holiday.
So we got into the weeds a little bit with This is a zeitgeist that is being manufactured by globalists, these internationalists.
They're setting anyone up who believes in any sort of state sovereignty, individual sovereignty, national sovereignty, as a right-wing extremist.
This civil war is obviously between these sort of maniacal-looking, serial killer-looking right-wing extremists, of course, white guys.
Against journalism itself.
And it's perpetuated by a dictatorship that is obviously very conservative as well.
And that's all coming in the context of Klaus Schwab coming out and talking about prescriptive programming.
And then we see this other documentary that we showed in the last segment of this God and Country trailer.
For this documentary about the woes and the evil that is Christian nationalism.
Saying that it's undemocratic, saying that it's not Christian to be a nationalist.
They say Christianity is all about Big Ten, everybody's welcome, inclusive of everybody, and that's true to a certain extent.
Grace does abound.
Christianity can save anyone who believes.
It's inclusive in that regard, but you've got to keep in mind that the kingdom of God is a nation in and of itself, and not everybody's going to be permitted to enter the kingdom of God.
It's easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God, right?
The way to the kingdom of God is narrow.
The black sheep and the white sheep will be sorted in judgment.
So, we've got some pretty serious border policy happening in terms of the kingdom of God in final judgment, but for some reason, it's not Christian to advocate that our nation have a border.
After all, there are some people that we would be happy to have here.
And there are some that we wouldn't like to have here, similar to God's kingdom.
There's some people that he would be happy to have there and some that are not welcome.
It's not for us to determine who as far as the kingdom of God is concerned, but to say that it's anti-Christian to believe in borders is pretty much the antithesis of the message of God and his son.
He provided a way, a legal path to citizenship.
And the only way to get into the kingdom is the one way through the Son of God, Jesus Christ.
That is how you legally immigrate to the kingdom of God.
And if you try to get in illegally, if you try to sneak in, if you beg to be let in, but you haven't gone through the legal process, sorry, you can't come in.
That sounds a lot like Republican border policy here in the United States.
And I don't know how I feel about Christian nationalism.
Because I'm a Christian and I'm a nationalist.
So I like both of those things.
But I believe in the separation of church and state.
I don't want the day to come where the state is telling me what denomination of Christianity I have to adhere to.
Or what specific doctrine I have to believe within the theology of Christianity.
So I am tolerant of religions that I despise.
And I believe in freedom of religion for religions that I despise in this country because I cherish my own ability to believe and worship how I want, to think what I want, to say what I want about these issues surrounding the human condition and the nature of the universe and God and what it means to be a human being.
So Christian nationalism, to me, rings this sort of Marriage of church and state that I'm not quite comfortable with, but I believe that we should be a Christian nation and our culture should have consensus around Christ.
More on the other side.
unidentified
Go to hell, New World Order.
Protect us.
Harvard's Academic Racial Accusations00:15:22
unidentified
We are running some old friends.
Is she alright? Seems okay if we can get to it.
If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.
Harrison, visit InfoWars.com forward slash show now.
I hope that old man got that tractor beam out of commission or this is going to be a real short trip.
Black scholar who says Harvard president plagiarized her work is livid as fifth example emerges.
Harvard president Claudine Gay has now been caught plagiarizing five academic papers, nearly half of her entire scholarly output, a sin that would seemingly be fatal for anyone else in her position.
One of the academics who was plagiarized, former Professor Carol Swain, is pissed after Harvard gave Gay a pass on what would have resulted in severe punishment and or expulsion for anyone else, as Town Hall's Christopher Ruffo reports.
She said, So we're going to go into a couple of different details about this.
The first clip I want to show you is clip number two.
This is a leftist interpretation of what's happening here.
They, of course, made it racist to even suggest that this woman should be expelled or kicked out of her position because of, basically, it's academic fraud, which is a major no-no.
I mean, most universities, if you get caught doing something like that, you're not going to graduate.
You're going to get expelled. I know that was a serious thing when I was in college.
Nobody did that.
It was just way too risky because if you got caught, you were done.
But apparently there's some sort of immunity going on here.
unidentified
Go ahead and run clip two. Oh, absolutely.
So they're using the guise of pretending that this is about concern over antisemitism, which is, of course, something that all of us should be concerned about.
It's really just further their propaganda campaign against, you know, racial equity.
So when you think about the fact that Harvard, this nation's oldest university, had about a 370-year explicit racial quota of Only hiring white men to be the president.
It's laughable to think that the first ever black woman following that unbroken line of white racial quotas is the one who's unqualified.
I mean, this is kind of the beauty of how racism works.
If you are black and you don't achieve, if you don't succeed at the highest echelon, it's because you're lazy and you're not smart enough.
Nobody is saying that she's unqualified because she's black.
They're saying that she's the president of Harvard because she's black and that she's not getting fired because she's black because it's anti-racism.
It's racism the other direction.
I have no problem with black women and black men being leaders of major businesses, major universities, teachers of our children, leaders of our churches.
I don't care about race at all.
Which is why it baffles me and bothers me so much when I see time and time again, example after example of companies publicly coming out and bragging about their policies to meet any racial quota.
Because there's no such thing as a racial quota.
That isn't racist.
That's the whole point. You're picking races over other races.
So when white people did it, it was wrong.
It was terrible. Only white people can be in this club.
Only white people can join this group.
Only white people can lead this organization.
Yeah, that was racist. That was wrong.
It's also wrong when you say, hey, half the board of directors has to be female and of color.
When, yes, half the population is female, but only 13% of Americans are African American or black, whatever the politically correct term is.
So, we need...
Why does everybody forget so easily about MLK? Obviously, we shouldn't just be totally colorblind and neglect and disregard culture and backgrounds of various people.
We should... Observe whatever's true whenever it's true.
But when you're creating these quotas and when you're determining who gets a position based on their race, that always manifests in greater problems than solutions.
It always creates even more bitterness and racism.
These positions should be about whoever is best for the job, regardless of who they are or what immutable characteristics they have.
I don't care if you're a black woman and you want to be the president of Harvard.
But I just hope that if you're hired as the president of Harvard, as a black woman, that it's because you were the most qualified best person for the job, which I believe is possible.
I have no doubt in my mind that a black woman could be the best person for the job.
But I don't want you to be hired because you're black.
Just like I don't want you to be hired because you're white.
At the inverse example.
So we've gotten into this identity politics so much that we've forgotten the entire moral principle and philosophy behind why racism is evil to begin with.
We've gone so anti-racism and we've politicized it so much and we've catalyzed it so much that we've actually forgotten why racism is evil in this country.
After the Civil War and the 600,000 Americans who died in a war over slavery and part over slavery at least.
Large part over slavery.
After the Civil Rights Movement and all the terrible things we saw of people of color being hosed down as they wore Sunday's best in peaceful protest.
After the different water fountains that we saw and the remarks about whether or not you could intermarry and desegregation, all the terrible racism that was very real and actually racist and unjust, the lynchings, the KKK, the terrible stuff that happened.
And we compensated for it the other direction, which was great.
But then we kept going.
And now it's starting to arrive at...
An unjust place again the other way.
Obviously, it's impossible to be colorblind or blind to someone's gender.
It's impossible for human beings not to categorize anything that they observe.
That's how we think. Our mind is structured to operate that way.
There's always going to be prejudice. There's always going to be stereotype.
So I'm not saying that, oh, I don't see black or I don't see women versus men or I don't see gay versus straight.
Of course I do. Everybody does. And if you say you don't, you're lying because you're just trying to virtue signal.
But you can observe the different immutable characteristics of people without acting immorally in response to it.
I can observe a beautiful woman without having an affair.
You don't have to do, it's not unjust to have an observation or to notice something that is true.
And so this idea that we have to observe these immutable characteristics and make decisions as to who gets what opportunity, who gets what income, based off of these immutable characteristics, logically always is and always will be, must be racist and bigoted.
And whenever you say that, the first thing they say is it's impossible to be racist against white people.
If you plagiarize five academic papers and you're the president of the most prestigious university in the history of the United States of America, you're fired.
Right? Welcome back to The War Room, folks.
I'm Chase Geiser, your host this evening.
We've been getting into this controversy around the president of Harvard who has been caught plagiarizing half of her academic work, something that would have an academic professional ostracized in almost any other example.
Let's see what Joe Rogan had to say about it.
He covered it. I thought this clip was pretty funny.
Clip 13 here. Rogan talks about this plagiarism.
It seems very obvious to me that this is hyper-politicized and not based off of any genuine Sympathies or appreciation for this woman's academic prowess.
Real Chris Brunette and I have obtained documentation demonstrating that Harvard president Claudine Gay plagiarized multiple sections of her PhD thesis violating Harvard's policies on academic integrity.
I can understand how somebody would copy and paste someone else's work into their document and then change it and adjust it and eventually delete all of that content for whatever is being manifest.
I've done that before where I've taken content that I really like, put it in a Word document, and used it as a frame of reference for something original that I'm creating.
But the fact that she did it five times is indicative that it was intentional, she did it on purpose, it was academic fraud.
And who cares?
You know, you plagiarize on a paper.
I don't really... It's unethical, it's terrible, whatever.
You just shared what somebody else said, practically speaking.
But the fact that you do that and you're leading this prestigious institution, some of the most impressive, both good and evil minds in the history of the United States have gone through the halls of Harvard.
And so this is a person that's supposed to be leading the future of the best.
Leading the best into the future.
And she's obviously...
A liar. And it's not even the fact that she's a liar alone that is the issue here.
But the issue is that she wasn't competent enough as a scholar to come up with something original herself that would be substantial enough or impressive enough to justify her current position.
So she stole it so that she would look good.
She stole somebody else's song so she could have a hit on the radio.
But whenever that happens, there's always a lawsuit and the thief always loses.
But for some reason, she's just immune here.
And it's not just these Ivy League schools either.
This starts at the lower levels.
It starts with the elementary school teachers.
It goes all the way up to the high school teachers.
Then it goes to the college professors.
Then it goes to the administration. This is indicative of a systemic problem.
You want to talk about systemic problems here.
I'm not talking about systemic racism.
Maybe systemic anti-racism, but systemic dishonesty and wokeness and just politicization of how we teach and how we lead generations into the future.
Getting a good education now is more important than ever.
Unfortunately, you can't get one at a university anymore because they're so political.
And they're so dead set on lying to you in order to prop up this intelligence community pushed narrative of wokeness and DEI and ESG and climate change and leftism good, right wing bad, that you can't get a good education at a university anymore.
I mean, I went to school to study audio engineering because I wanted to work in recording studios.
And I took classes where I was receiving political lectures.
Countless occasions.
When I'm supposed to be learning how to solder a mic pre-together, I'm hearing lectures about politics or I'm going to student government mandated training from the administration on microaggressions.
And how, as a white man, I'm inherently racist in the little things that I do that are unconscious, subconscious, not even intentional, are offensive and racist.
And hopefully we'll get to some of your calls in the next hour as well.
So keep the phones close by.
Normally I don't like to read entire articles or long articles on the show, but there's
so many details in this particular story that I'm going to read quite a bit of this.
Ms. Taylor, 26, is identified as the staffer who was paddleboarding with Barack Obama's chef, Tafari Campbell, in unsealed Secret Service records that also describe the chaotic scene as agents scrambled to save him.
So, newly released Secret Service records show how agents attempted to rescue Obama's personal chef when he fell off his paddleboard in Martha's Vineyard.
His body wasn't found until the next morning.
These records show the chaotic early moments as agents scramble to try and rescue Barack Obama's personal chef in Martha's Vineyard, struggling to get a motorboat into the murky water with just 15 minutes of daylight.
So I'm not hearing that this water was described as heavy flowing or rapid or dangerous or treacherous.
I'm hearing that the sun was up and the water was murky.
So maybe if he was underwater, it would be hard to see him.
But why did he drown?
You can actually swim in murky water, you know.
If you know how to swim. So agents tried but failed to get two motorboats on the property working.
Finally, they had to use the groundskeeper's motorboat.
But you're trying to start a boat when somebody's drowning?
Why wouldn't you swim out?
But it was too late. Tefari Campbell, 45, never surfaced the night of July 23rd, and his body was pulled from Edgar Town Great Pond the following day.
So Judicial Watch successfully sued the Department of Homeland Security to obtain these incident reports, but they were heavily redacted and sort of mirror the statements that we already have.
But a couple more details here.
One agent, John Crunkelton Jr., recalled Campbell and the other staffer leaving the president's residence on the way down to the water.
They picked up two stand-up paddle boards and proceeded to the water on the Edgar Town Great Pond.
Approximately 20 to 30 minutes later, while in blank, I saw blank running toward me from the northwest, blank, waving her arms frantically at me.
I ran out of the booth and met her midway across the lawn directly in front of the residence.
she collapsed on the ground and stated that Tafari had drowned.
She stated that he fell in the water and struggled for a couple of seconds
before giving up and sinking underwater.
The incident report continues.
She had pushed one of the paddleboards twice.
This is really, really bizarre.
Campbell had been paddleboarding with a woman, another Obama staff member, When he fell off his board and drowned in Edgar Town Great Pond on July 23rd, she was identified in Secret Service records as Miss Taylor, a staff member.
So, there's like no reasonable explanation.
There's no rapids. There's no...
He hit his head and he was unconscious and so that's why he drowned.
He sat up with Taylor, the other paddleboarder, as she led them to the drowning site.
This is the agent. About a quarter mile away, she explained that Campbell didn't have a life jacket and was wearing black shorts and a black shirt with no shoes.
The search commenced approximately 7.45 p.m., with the sun setting just after 8 p.m., so there was little time.
It doesn't make any sense.
So the reason I wanted to cover this story, not only because it's so bizarre, is because I had an awesome conversation with Gavin McInnes.
That was maybe a couple years ago now.
And we were talking about the Clinton death count.
And I'm no fan of Barack Obama, and I don't think Gavin McInnes is either.
But one of the points he made, which at the time seemed like a fairly reasonable point, was that there's all these people, dozens of people, some estimates over 70 people associated with the Clintons that have died of mysterious causes.
At least a dozen that are definitely wonky.
Including one of Clinton's chefs, I believe, who also drowned.
And McInnes makes this point.
It's like, hey, you don't really hear about that around the Obama family.
And the point was, something bizarre is going on because if there was a reasonable explanation for all these deaths, these mysterious deaths around the Clintons, then you'd see the same mysterious deaths around all the other presidents.
There would be a list of dozens of people associated with Bush and the other Bush and Trump and all of them.
It would just be like a thing, sort of like the six degrees of separation where, hey, look, if you're at that level of leadership and you know that many people and you have that many people working under you, statistically, maybe it's reasonable that, A certain number of people die of mysterious causes and it gets reported and people are aware of it.
Maybe there's a disproportionate amount of attention on you because of who you are.
And so that's why we notice it.
But traditionally, it hasn't been true of the other presidents, like the Clintons.
And watch what he said.
It didn't age well, but I texted him this after I heard the news of Obama's chef and he laughed.
It's hysterical. Let's go ahead and run the clip.
unidentified
29. Dude, I did a deep dive research on all these mysterious deaths around the Clintons.
So there's 70 that people talk about, but there's 12 that are just hard to shake.
The guy with the weights where they fell on his neck and crushed his windpipe?
That's such a bizarre thing. Obviously, he was comfortable swimming if he was paddleboarding at night, wearing just a shirt and shorts, and it was really too early.
I mean, it wasn't even dark out yet, so saying that he was just trashed or drunk or passed out on drugs is unlikely, given the context that we have, assuming that the context is even true.
Maybe the whole entire thing is just totally made up.
But it seems to me that we have a political class that loves it when people who know too much die of mysterious causes.
And it's always sort of, if it's not a shotgun wound to the stomach and the head and hanging yourself, it's always asphyxiation.
There's almost like a serial killer, right?
Serial killers are famous among psychiatrists and psychologists.
There was a whole show called Mindhunter that was on Netflix for at least one season about how the government formed its initial profiling documents around serial killers so that they could understand the psychology of serial killers and then that would help them identify and find these perpetrators sooner than later.
And there's a couple things in common that they have.
One of the things is usually it's a white guy in their 20s.
Usually they're very tidy and neat.
Not always, but usually they have a little bit of a tendency for just obscene amount of order.
Usually, let's see, what else was there?
Usually they return to the scene of the crime and they have a tendency to
Kill their victims or treat their victims in a very similar way every time
So they've got a strangulation thing or they got a stabbing thing or they have a shooting thing, whatever
There's some sort of fetish associated with that. Why is it that when we look at these?
mysterious deaths around our politicians whether it's Obama's chef or Bill Clinton's chef
Who was that Clinton affiliated guy who shot himself with a shotgun and then hanged himself?
and Then of course Epstein
Why are they always hanging themselves?
Why are they always literally just strangled?
The life is just strangled out of them.
And maybe the explanation for that is that it's easier for some reason to get away with killing somebody if you're strangling.
There's no murder weapon, less evidence, but I'm pretty sure an autopsy could determine whether or not somebody was strangled.
But maybe it looks the same as if they hang themselves.
So it's just a good cover. But there's like this profile around the assassinations committed on behalf of the political class that makes it seem like there's this sort of sick, satanic, demonic psychology behind these acts.
That it's not only an act of psychopathic pragmatism.
Like, hey, I'm just doing this because it's necessary.
But there's something to it that it's fulfilling to those who make the order or actually do the act.
Because they're always happening in the same way.
They always happen years later without a lot of connections.
And it's always sort of embarrassing and just sort of offensive how they play these things off as just totally normal when all the evidence is so bizarre.
But it's as if there's one evil consciousness that's behind all of these political killings.
And that, to me, just suggests that it's an orchestrated, actual evil entity operating.
The political class has taken on a consciousness, but not a conscience.
And it is getting off on eradicating all of its enemies in this fetish way.
More on the other side. Welcome back to The War Room, folks.
I am Chase Geiser, filling in for the great Owen Schroyer, who I believe is going to be calling in in the next hour, but we're not certain.
He's traveling today because he is going to be on TimCast.
I'm not sure if his episode airs tonight.
I imagine that it does.
So make sure you tune into that later on after this broadcast is over.
I had a great time on TimCast as well.
I was very, very impressed with their whole operation over there.
They fly you out there.
They pay for your... Your hotel, they even give you a driver, and they pick you up, and they take you to the airport.
It was royalty.
It felt pretty cool. It felt like a big shot.
They make you feel like a big shot, and I know that I'm not, but it was a really neat experience, and Tim was really nice, and it was so nice to finally get to meet Ian Crossland, whose podcast I was on the other day as well, and we had a great conversation.
It was A groundbreaking day in terms of the news.
What was it that broke that day?
I can't remember. It was a really, really big deal.
And so it was a really cool episode.
It was on a Monday night. And it was right after all this drama going on overseas that's obviously designed to get us into World War III. And there's more evidence that...
Congress actually wants us to get rubbed into these wars because they do everything they can to make it illegal for the United States or make it as difficult as possible for our nation to declare itself independent of the international community.
I mean, it's the whole reason we had a revolution in the first place was so that we would have some sort of sovereignty and independence, and now we've...
Signed our way back into indentured servitude to the international community, but really our politicians don't serve the international community.
We serve the international community as slaves to our politicians who get kickback on these contracts and this aid, and that's why this globalization is occurring.
So Oklahoma governor signs an executive order effectively banning DEI and all state institutions, which is great news.
But we see this other report that Congress is making an effort to make it illegal for any president to single-handedly, unanimously get us out of NATO. So, as I understand it, and I'm not an expert in legal theory, but as I understand it, one of the roles of the executive branch, one of the roles of the President of the United States...
Is to negotiate trade deals and relations with the other nations of the world.
That's the job.
And so when you have members of Congress advocating that it become illegal for the President of the United States to unilaterally get us either into or out of, in this case, any sort of foreign treaty, it really softens the executive branch.
It really gets us tied in and more and more entrenched in this red tape of internationalism, globalism.
And as a layman, initially when I look at our behavior with these countries overseas, It doesn't make sense on the surface because I'm thinking like a normal human being.
I'm thinking like a business owner who's trying to provide for his family, try to make ends meet, try not to be wasteful.
I'm thinking like an individual, reasonable person thinks about money.
And so you look at all the billions of dollars we give to Ukraine and the billions of dollars we give to Israel and the billions in aid we give to miscellaneous countries and miscellaneous communities, many of which I've never heard of before.
Some of them quite obscure.
Anytime any sort of earthquake happens or tsunami happens, there's millions and millions and millions of dollars.
Like our government is so desperate.
Every single time we have to negotiate a budget, They negotiate raising the debt ceiling.
They're so desperate for cash.
But then whenever the smallest tragedy happens, they spend the money immediately.
I'm sure you know what it feels like.
I know what it feels like to go through good times financially and then bad times financially.
I think a lot of people are struggling right now.
What happens when you struggle?
Well, you cut spending. I have spent probably 15% The discretionary spending that I spent four years ago, three years ago, just because things are tighter now.
Money's more important. I got a family to take care of.
And so why is it that our government's acting so broke all the time and they're always having this impossible debate and argument about the budget every single time.
The government's going to shut down. The government's going to shut down.
The government's going to shut down. But then when they pass the budget, they just spend all the money.
It doesn't make any sense, right? But then when you look at the fact that our politicians on $175,000 a year somehow have three houses.
And they're flying on private jets all the time.
And they're having this luxury life, this royal experience all the time.
They wear the nicest suits.
They travel all over the world all the time.
They have the nicest things.
They have the nicest experiences.
They live like kings and queens.
Like, wait, they must be making money some other way.
Well, a lot of our politicians, they're business owners too, right?
So maybe they're rich because they made a lot of money as a small business owner and that's why they have these private jets and stuff.
It's not anything to do with Congress.
And then you look and you're like, nah, what did Dan Crenshaw do other than be a congressman?
What does AOC do other than be a congresswoman?
What does Nancy Pelosi do again other than trade stocks?
And you realize that The whole scheme is our politicians get elected and whoever the House Majority Leader is, or whoever the House Minority Leader is, either one, determines who's going to be on what committees.
And so all the politicians immediately sell out to the establishment party because they want to get put on the committees they want to get put on.
But why do they care so much about whether they're on X community versus Y community.
Why do they care so much whether they get on the Transportation Committee versus the Defense Committee?
Well, that's because the way they make money is they've legalized insider trading.
They cannot be prosecuted as members of Congress for insider trading because they have to sit on these committees.
They have to know what's going to happen next to get these classified reports before the public is aware of them.
That's part of the job, right?
And so what they do is they sell out to whoever the leadership is in the party, Mitch McConnell's, whatever, Chuck Schumer's.
They sell out to them so they get placed on the committees that they want that are going to be the most lucrative for their insider trading racket.
Then once they're on those committees, they get information.
That keys them into what to buy, what to sell, and they also get to determine what to vote on, and they know how that's going to make an impact on the market.
And so they do insider trading for term after term, for year after year, and they make millions upon millions of dollars.
And on the surface, it's like, yeah, so what if they know something and they invest and they make a little extra cash?
Well, that's not all, folks, because what happens is every time we give money to a foreign government, If we decide that we want to help North Korea for some reason with its electrical grid infrastructure, if we decide we're going to send US contractors over there, if we decide we're going to send water bottles and food supplies to Haiti after a tsunami or an earthquake or whatever, our politicians are often personally invested in those contractors that get the government bids to fulfill those contracts.
So our politicians are so eager to spend our money because the more of our money they spend, the more kickback they get on the investments that they make with their insider trading.
And then when they run out of money, they always have this debate as if they're broke, and they are broke, but they always want to increase the debt ceiling because their racket doesn't work if the government stops spending.
So, like I said in the beginning of this segment, we, as the American people, work for this international community as slaves of our own political class.
They force us to pay taxes to work for them.
Then they spend those taxes in these international interests, these globalist interests, whether it's foreign aid, whether it's climate change initiatives, you name it, anything that happens at the WF, NATO, United Nations, And they're invested in the organizations, the businesses, the contractors who fulfill the services and the products that they push internationally.
So they get the kickback. They launder our tax money through them.
So we work as slaves for our political class for the benefit of the political class and the international community.
And that's how globalism has come to pass.
That's the incentive.
That's why our politicians want to make it impossible to leave the UN or to leave NATO. They want to get as many people who are like-minded and as many nations involved as possible, like Ukraine.
And they want to expand this racket So they can all use it as an excuse or a justification to spend their various peoples, these various nations' peoples, tax money and get kickback on the investments and make millions of dollars.
How is it that Klaus Schwab is the leader of the World Economic Forum when there is no demonstrable evidence of any of his business prowess or success?
Why is this guy, the leader of the World Economic Forum, if I can't for the life of me name a single thing he's actually accomplished other than being the closest thing to a Bond villain I've ever seen in my life?
I can tell you what Elon Musk has accomplished.
I can tell you what Bill Gates of all people has accomplished.
I can tell you what Steve Jobs has accomplished.
I can name successful people that lead major organizations.
That makes sense.
But I can't explain for the life of me how Klaus Schwab came out of nowhere, how Nikki Haley came out of nowhere.
Well, it's because they're propped up by the establishment, folks, to steal our money and enslave us for a globalist agenda.
Issued a lawful subpoena to the president's son that we expect him to come in and be deposed.
This is a normal process in an investigation.
This has been a serious, credible, transparent investigation from day one.
We've published four bank memorandums.
We've had countless press conferences.
This is an investigation about public corruption at the highest level.
We have accumulated mountains of evidence that's concerning to an overwhelming majority of Americans.
We have specific questions in there, and I think we're going to allow you in there to see the piles and piles of documents, of bank statements, of emails, of text messages that we've worked very hard on in this committee over the last eight or nine months.
We expect to depose the president's son, and then we'll be more than happy to have a public hearing with him.
You know, we're disappointed that he didn't show up.
I mean, he was just across the way at the Capitol.
You think he could come here and set the question.
If you do it in an open format now, you're gonna get filibusters, you're gonna get speeches, you're gonna get all kinds of things.
What we want is the facts.
And the way you get the facts, And every single investigation I've been involved in is you bring people in for an interview behind closed doors where you can get those facts.
And then, as the chairman said, we'd love for him to come public.
Finally, I would say this. Mr.
Biden's counsel and the White House have both argued that the reason he couldn't come for a deposition was because there wasn't a formal vote for an impeachment inquiry.
Well, that's going to happen in a few hours.
We think it's going to pass.
We think the House of Representatives will go on record with a power that solely resides in the House to say we are in an official impeachment inquiry phase of our oversight.
And when that happens, we'll see what their excuse is then.
They should have been here today, but once we take that vote, we expect him to come in for his interview, for his deposition.
And frankly, we'll also, I think, look at contempt proceedings as we move forward.
There was telephone calls, meetings, dinners, you name it.
We know what happened with Burisma in Ukraine in that December 4th through December 9th time frame where Joe Biden goes and leverages conditions that American tax money on the firing of the prosecutor who was looking in to the executives of the very company Hunter Biden was on the board of.
unidentified
We know those facts. Remember, Joe Biden said he never met with any of these people or talked to any of these people.
That was the narrative before we began this investigation.
Now we know he met with and talked to every single one of them.
So the president hasn't been honest about his associations with these people who have been wiring millions and millions of dollars to Hunter Biden and the Biden family.
Look, I think every American has a simple question.
What did the Bidens do to receive the tens of millions of dollars from our enemies around the world?
That's a simple question.
unidentified
Chairman Comer, do you acknowledge that you haven't answered that question and that you found no evidence of wrongdoing or criminal conduct?
Call me anytime. We're going to let the crew screen some of these calls and then I'll start taking them.
But there is more news to cover in the interim.
So we covered pretty extensively how globalism has manifest.
Why it's a racket.
Why our government is always complaining that it's broke and then spending the money so frivolously when it has it.
Why it prints it and backs up these initiatives that don't make any sense like climate change and these DEI programs and these trainings.
You just name it.
Everything they spend money on. There were articles about it.
All the crazy things that were earmarked in some of the COVID relief bills.
Remember during the pandemic in 2020?
As part of an earmark to a COVID relief bill, there was, what was it?
Millions of dollars for Iran to be able to research?
Was it like frogs or something?
Does the crew remember? I don't know.
There's just countless examples.
You can look it up and see time and time again.
It was shrimp. Yeah, I think so.
Shrimp on a treadmill. That's right.
You know that's because they had money in whatever organization was going to do that research.
I mean, the famous example that I'm familiar with that I've mentioned on air a million times is the fact that Rosemont Seneca, Hunter Biden's investment firm, was invested in Metabiota the same year that Metabiota got $23.9 million in DOD contracts while Joe Biden was vice president.
We know that Joe Biden was sharing a bank account with Hunter back then.
You think that 10% came back for the big guy?
That would make a lot of sense.
Investing in biolabs, doing research in biolabs in Ukraine, and then denying that they exist after Putin uncovered that during the invasion.
Maybe that's one of the reasons why we're so adamant about protecting Ukraine, because it's our money laundering infrastructure being threatened.
But Congress has approved this bill barring any president from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO. Congress has just approved legislation that would stop any president from withdrawing the United States from NATO without approval from the Senate or an act of Congress.
They don't want the United States spontaneously leaving NATO. They are really afraid that Trump's going to win or somebody like Trump is going to win and do something like that.
Because NATO is part of the racket.
All the spending that is so predictable and reliable every single year with our relations there.
That's why we have a trade deficit all the time.
Trump was right when he came out and said that it's ridiculous these deals that we have negotiated with these other nations.
We're getting screwed. We're spending way more than they are.
They're not living up to their investment promises and commitments in these international relations that we have.
It's stupid for us to do it as a nation, and it's true.
As a nation, it's stupid, but it makes a lot of sense for our politicians to do a stupid thing when it makes so much stupid money for them.
And you know what? I'm actually going to give a shout-out because one of the things that's different about those of us who are not of the left and those who are of the left is that the left is cognitively, spiritually, psychologically, emotionally incapable of acknowledging when anyone on the right is ever right ever.
I mean, they'll make exceptions, but only in the case of RINOs, people who aren't actually Republicans or right-wing at all.
But I'm going to give a shout out to Ro Khanna, who, in clip 23, we're going to run this in a second, has recently proposed legislation to make it illegal for Congress to conduct insider trading.
The type of insider trading that has contributed to this wasteful spending and these international globalist organizations that we get involved with so they can ensure that their portfolios increase in value.
And I disagree with 9 out of 10 things that Ro Khanna says.
But I'm starting to come to the conclusion that I disagree with him because he's wrong, not because he's lying.
And one of the reasons I believe that is because if you recall, when the Twitter files first came out, I believe he was the only Democrat who actually reached out to Twitter while it was still publicly traded Twitter.
And expressed concern over violations of the First Amendment rights of Americans who were being censored, deplatformed, silenced, disproportionately punished.
And though I don't agree with any of his policies, the fact that he privately did that, it wasn't a PR stunt.
It wasn't something that he ever knew would be public.
He sent a private email internally that leaked in the Twitter files.
Expressing concerns about American rights being violated by Twitter.
That indicates to me that there's some semblance of character in his spirit.
And now he's coming out and he's trying to pass legislation against insider trading.
Let's see what he has to say here in this clip.
unidentified
It's clip 23. Madam Speaker, all I want for Christmas is to clean up the corruption in Congress.
That is why tomorrow morning I will be introducing my political reform and anti-corruption resolution supported by unusual whales, capital trades, And Quiver Quantitative.
CRU has also done important work on these issues.
It calls for five things.
First, a ban on all PAC and lobbyist money.
Second, a ban on members of Congress trading stock.
Third, a ban on members ever becoming lobbyists.
Fourth, term limits for members of Congress and Supreme Court justices.
And fifth, a binding code of ethics for the Supreme Court.
The American people on both sides are frustrated by the corruption in Washington.
We need real change.
I hope members on both sides will support this resolution that we introduce tomorrow.
And it's possible that he's only suggesting it publicly for the political favor that it will grant him.
And then he knows that it's impossible that this would ever pass.
So it's sort of a no-brainer.
It's easy for him to pretend.
That he supports this legislation knowing that it's not going to pass.
It's possible that that's what's going on here.
But I'm inclined to think that maybe he actually does believe that the laws need to change around that.
But we see that this insider trading is going on.
This conversation around this insider trading is going on.
It's all happening while we're giving billions to Ukraine.
We're giving billions to Israel. We're getting involved in all these conflicts and all these aid packages for God knows whatever reason.
And the Biden administration has the record November budget deficit.
It just ran the largest November budget deficit in history and managed to speak
even with a 9% increase in government receipts. So the November budget shortfall came in at
$314.01 billion, according to the monthly treasury statement, that was 26% higher than the November
2022 deficit. Just two months into fiscal 2024, the federal government has run up $380.58 billion
in red ink. This falls on the heels of the third largest annual budget deficit in history.
So he's spending like a madman.
And he's giving all the money to foreign interests and basically sacrificing all the interests of the American people.
He's not protecting the border. There's criminals running around constantly.
And he's obviously a shill for these organizations.
We know that he was involved in these bio-research labs through Rosemont Seneca.
And here he is Basically pretending to be a pharmacist in clip 20, where he's talking about how his administration has done things so much to make medication and drugs so much more affordable.
Check this out. Taxpayers already are chipping in, paying a lot of money for that here at NIH to get these brilliant scientists to go out and find cures, find answers to the drug problem, to drugs, with the use of drugs for health problems.
We're coming up on a break here in about 40 seconds.
That's 877-789-2539.
I want to hear what you think about this political climate, what's going on right now.
What do you think about the Trump persecution that we're seeing, the fake Republican primary that we're witnessing, And the incessant slipperiness of the Bidens in getting away with virtually everything while political dissidents are punished for things that they did not even do.
NPR, notably, is the only poll that I see here in this list of polls saying that Biden has a chance of winning.
Of course, they're a government-sponsored news organization.
More on the other side, folks.
Welcome back to The War Room, folks.
I'm Chase Geiser, your host this evening.
We will be taking calls the rest of the hour.
Right out of the gate, I want to speak with Nathaniel in Alabama.
That movie, the new one, I couldn't shake the feeling that I was watching it and Kind of in the same way, but knowing that it was going to happen a year later.
Now, was it anti-white or was it just the one scene that everybody's been hyping up as anti-white?
Was the whole movie sort of anti-white Americans?
unidentified
No, well... The younger African-American girl who was the daughter of the guy, he was kind of snarky, and he treated the white family as kooks, didn't really trust them.
But to be fair, the white people didn't trust them either at first.
So it was kind of back and forth, and they were both kind of bitchy, to be honest.
You know, it's You know what's crazy about that, that specific example you gave, is you find skeletons that are thousands and thousands of years old, they still have their teeth attached.
How is it that you can have a health condition where your teeth just fall out?
I mean, your teeth don't fall out after you've been dead for 2,000 years.
The microwave weapon is like a localized EMP. We have those on cruise missiles to fly through enemy territory and set off a microwave that fries electronics.
But that's different from a cyber attack.
I haven't seen the movie, so I'm not sure how the Tesla motor cars still function if they've been fried.
And they're like kamikaze attackers, you know, with no drivers in them.
There's coordination. These things have been in the making for more than a year.
They all know what they're doing in the industry.
It's like when they make films that are almost the same movie at the same time in a competing sort of way.
Everybody in Hollywood knows what they're doing at the same time.
There are all that script sharing and co-writing of things that happens.
But yeah, my bigger point was the deficit spending is just going to keep going up exponentially because with the interest rates rising, We're going to pay more interest on the money we're borrowing, you know, over and over.
Jefferson, thanks for your call. Stick with us, folks.
More calls on the other side. Welcome back to the War Room, folks.
I'm Chase Geiser, your host this evening.
I don't think Owen's going to call in.
We haven't been able to hear from him.
He mentioned earlier that he did want to call in, and then we didn't hear from him, so he may still be in airplane mode and unable to reach us, but he will be on TimCast, so make sure you tune in for that.
First up, I want to hear from Kyle in North Carolina.
Kyle, what's on your mind? Hey, how you doing?
unidentified
Good, thanks for calling. I just want to give a little bit of a contrarian view to everyone talking about that movie.
Okay, cool. I just thought, at the time that I watched it, and especially for it being on Netflix, I didn't know anything about the Obama issue.
And I would assume that the only thing that he contributed was that one line, that one racist line.
Yeah. Well, thank you for your call and sharing that sort of different approach to this topic.
That's interesting. I'm going to have to give it a shot.
Maybe my wife and I will watch it.
Let's hear next from Jordan in Oregon.
Jordan, what's on your mind?
unidentified
Hey, Chase. How's it going? Good, man.
Thanks for calling. Hey, before I say what I'm going to say, Just keep in mind, I have no love for Putin.
Okay. But what I'm thinking about right now is Putin said that he wasn't really going to deal with the U.S. until essentially Trump got back in office, is what I read today.
Now, whether that's true or not, I don't really know.
But if that's true, this might just be my optimism talking, but can we just hope that Putin knows that the average American citizen doesn't want to go to nuclear war with him?
I feel like Most people, I'm a heavy equipment operator, and all my buddies, we do our thing, we take care of our family.
The normal average American does not want this war.
And I'm hoping that he can know that and just see that it's these globalists that are just trying to take over our country, you know?
Vladimir Putin didn't understand exactly what's going on.
You've got to keep in mind that Russia, after the fall of the Soviet Union, was an incredibly politically dangerous place.
There was all sorts of corruption and bribery and arms deals going on.
And you didn't really know who you could trust.
And some people loved...
If you were formerly involved in the Communist Party, some people hated you for it.
It was a very, very complicated, risky, dangerous environment for anybody with political aspirations.
And somehow, Vladimir Putin found a way to rise to power and stay in power safely for decades in the most dangerous political environment imaginable.
And he did all of this without ever firing a nuclear weapon despite having perhaps the largest arsenal of nuclear weapons on Earth.
And so of all people that would use a nuclear weapon, I think that Vladimir Putin is probably the least likely because he would have done it already countless other times throughout his reign.
unidentified
I think you're right, my man.
Well, that was what was on my mind, but I appreciate you taking my call.
Yeah, great call, man. I love talking to you about that.
All right, let's hear from Tim in California.
unidentified
Tim, what's up? All right, here's a little Friday light for you.
When Harrison yesterday first showed the Nutcracker, White House, Christmas, tap dancing thing, for the sake of the radio listeners, he attempted to do a play-by-play through the whole thing.
Oh, amazing. By the time he got towards the end, he was really suffering.
He finally said, it feels like we're having some sort of acid flashback or something.
And at that moment, I thought, you know, it's like the Rocky Horror Picture Show from 1975.
It's just I thought, hey, if you could put them side by side in your brain and see those two playing at the same time, it looks like the same cast of characters.
Yeah, that's so crazy that we've arrived at a place where this distorted, bizarre, disturbed fantasy has become our reality.
And the thing is, it's not just the weird cultural perversions and divergence that we have.
Frankly, I don't care about Whether or not people are weird or different or have different sexual inclinations or whatever.
I don't care if people have these feelings and they live their lives privately as consenting adults in whatever way they want.
But when it gets into our schools and there's this insistence and this push to project this basically what I consider mental illness on an entire generation and do it incessantly and insistently.
That's when it gets very obvious to me that this is about some sort of political undermining of American culture, Western culture.
And then it extends beyond that into a place where you have these members of this community, these sort of divergent alt-cultures that are not what we would say traditionally American values or the traditional American stereotype.
you have them advocating and supporting Hamas in protest when Hamas would kill
them and it's not necessarily that any things would be much friendlier for them
in Israel given their political persuasions or their sexual dispositions
but the fact that we're so deluded that we would support and cheer on a
political entity or a religious entity that literally believes that the most
just outcome for us is to be publicly executed in a very barbaric brutal way
either stoning thrown off buildings hanged you name it and so we've arrived
at a place as a culture where it doesn't matter what the facts are it doesn't
matter who has the best argument what's going to happen in terms of policy
decisions and leadership decisions and election outcomes is all based off of
this very subjective unpredictable emotional whim that inevitably results
in just total chaos and then total collapse until Until the only people who remain are those who are the toughest, the most rational, and the strongest to rebuild something new from the ground up in the ashes.
Stick with us, folks. More calls in the final segment.
Call on 877-789-2539.
Welcome back to the War Room, folks.
It is the final segment of the show.
If you want to get on the air, call on 877-789-2539.
Again, that's 877-789-2539.
If you call in now, chances are I could potentially get to you.
But there is one story I do want to cover this segment.
And it's really a conglomeration of stories that tell the same story.
If we have an overhead cam here, I want everybody to be able to see this quadrant all at once of these headlines.
We've got the U.S. terrorist watch list growing to two million people, nearly doubling in six years.
Now this is a list that is composed of Americans and international terrorists.
There's two million people on this list.
But we didn't have any idea that October 7th was going to happen, even though we have lists like this.
Alex Jones responds to ex-community notes citing NATO's claim of not officially mobilizing for war with Russia.
Obviously. NATO is mobilizing for war with Russia.
We've been funding a war against Russia for two years now.
The whole entire international community.
We've had troops over there, not necessarily fighting, but probably fighting and training.
There's the Ukrainian International Legion.
There's the billions of dollars.
There's the equipment, the weapons. We've done everything except for actually physically, explicitly, publicly kill Russian soldiers.
So yeah, it's obvious.
And there's mainstream headlines that say it.
Two more ships struck by Houthi missiles As Maresk diverts all tankers from Red Sea.
So then we have reports that we're being attacked, that NATO is completely innocent, that the terrorist watch list has doubled.
EU to open membership talks with Ukraine and Moldova.
So as Ukraine is about ready to totally lose the war, they pretty much have lost the war already.
The EU is going to open membership talks with them?
But we're not mobilizing for war with Russia?
And in the Russian... Ukraine war, Putin tells Russia his war objectives are unchanged, which is consistent with everything that he's done over the last two years and all of his stated objectives.
So, every single variable here points to an explicit conflict between the international community, NATO, and Russia, which would likely lead to China and others.
World War III, basically. Everyone's preparing for it.
All the prices of ammunition have gone up because we've sold so much overseas.
Reports about that coming out today.
And still, Zelenskyy cannot admit defeat after his country has totally been annihilated.
The two regions he was in civil war with are working to be absorbed by Russia.
So they were declared independent republics.
Both the leaders of Those two republics are seeking to be absorbed into Russia and become part of Russia.
So the civil war is definitely lost between Ukraine and Ukraine.
Those regions have been liberated from Ukraine.
And Ukraine's gained virtually no territory whatsoever.
The only thing they've accomplished is killing an astronomical number of Russians.
But that's what happens to Russians every single war that they get in.
and they still win because they're willing to die.
They're just disciplined like that.
They don't care or they're disciplined, whatever.
There's some sort of audacity about the Russians where numbers that would be
appalling to us are sustainable to them psychologically.
And I've said before that I didn't think that he was going to be in
office for another 90 days because when you're losing a war and when everything
that you order or say or suggest as a leader only results in the unnecessary
death of soldiers, the leadership in your military starts to despise you and hate you.
You know the war is over. You know that you've lost the war.
Why are we sending my men to die needlessly?
There's a certain bond as I understand it between military leaders and their soldiers, especially if they're strong leaders and they've been through hardship together with their men.
And so I suspect that we are very likely to have a situation with Zelensky that's very similar to the Valkyrie story between Adolf Hitler and one of his military leaders who plotted to assassinate Hitler because Hitler was losing the war and making irrational decisions resulting in unnecessary German deaths.
So there was an assassination attempt where Tom Cruise famously in the movie portrayed the man, the real life character who did this, walked in, left a briefcase, it exploded.
Hitler was injured but not substantially harmed.
It was a failed assassination attempt.
And now we're starting to see some similar behavior from Ukrainians.
Let's look at clip 14 here.
Now, I just want to warn you, this is graphic.
You're going to see somebody intentionally blow themselves up with a grenade in a closed room, just like Valkyrie.
This sort of stuff is starting to happen.
unidentified
Go ahead and run it. Some sort of meeting going on.
Several people were injured. I believe the man with the grenade was the only one who actually died so far.
But that was a Valkyrie-level moment.
I mean, you would think that he would go in there and throw the grenade and then leave the room.
But for some reason, he decided to stay.
And this is not your suicide bombing story that we're all familiar with of some sort
of radical form of religious zealotry where somebody goes in, they believe they're going
to get 40 virgins or they're doing it for Muhammad or whatever.
This was just a Ukrainian guy walking in there and deciding to blow up that entire room.
I don't even know what they were meeting about.
But this sort of stuff is what happens right before a government is about ready to be totally unseated.
I think there's going to be a military coup very soon.
I think there's going to be somebody by Russia sponsored to replace Zelensky and manifest this coup.
And I think if Zelensky doesn't pull out of this war soon, he's likely dead.
And not even necessarily by Russian hands, but by his own men.
Because he is just inspiring all sorts of mutiny among the military personnel in Ukraine by needlessly insisting that they keep fighting a losing war, needlessly insisting that they keep going into the meat grinder, needlessly recruiting middle-aged and even senior citizens to fight this war because everyone else is dead.
Have you noticed that the pro-Ukraine trolls have gone quiet lately?
You know, there's a story about the Titanic.
It's very interesting. I can't remember who the survivor was who told this story, but the lifeboats were in the water and somewhat filled.
They weren't filled completely because there wasn't enough time to fill them all and get them down.
So there were survivors that rode away from the ship because at the time the thinking was that if the boats were too close to the ship when it sank there would be some sort of suction that might capsize the lifeboat so they rode away intentionally and this survivor talks about when the Titanic finally went under there was massive amounts of screaming and wailing There's hundreds of people in the water, all in the same location, not far away, freezing cold, terrified, in the dark, no light.
The boat's electricity was out.
It was underwater. There was no light.
It was just pitch black, freezing cold water in the middle of the ocean.
And then, in a matter of minutes, The juxtaposition from insane screams from hundreds of people to total silence.
Because they all died.
Hyperthermia. That's what the pro-Ukrainian trolls remind me of on Twitter.
Because two years ago, whenever you said anything critical of Ukraine, you would get a slew of pro-Ukrainian individuals, Ukrainian volunteers, Ukrainian soldiers in your replies.
Screaming. It was like there were thousands of them screaming at how terrible we were.
How evil everything was.
How much suffering they were going through.
How righteous they were.
And now? I don't hear anything but silence.
And I wonder if it's because they all died.
Well, that's a hell of a way to end a show.
I hope you guys have a great weekend.
It is payday. Make sure you go to Infowarsstore.com and be the reason we are still on the air.
Give yourself and others the gift of turbocharged energy this Christmas.
TurboForce Plus is back in stock for 25% off plus free shipping and double Patriot points.
And today is the last day, I'm told, that we can guarantee you will receive your order by Christmas if you order.
So if today's payday free, if you have a little bit of cash left over, if you were planning on buying Christmas gifts from InfoWarsStore.com instead of major retail box stores like Target who hate you or Walmart who hates you or Amazon who hates you, Then today is the day to do it.
Now is the time to do it.
Go to Infowarsstore.com and be the reason we are still on the air while getting your Christmas gifts this season.
Turbo Force Plus from Infowars Life is the most advanced formula for optimum focus and energy we have ever offered.
And after being unavailable for months, we're glad to bring it back to you at 25% off.
With an energy blend that contains amino acids for sustained energy metabolism and an herbal energy blend with very high levels of several herbs for peak energy, Turbo Force Plus is a force to be reckoned with.
Visit InfoWarsStore.com and may the TurboForce be with you.
We've received several million followers in just the last six hours.
I was able to interview him today for over two hours.
That interview drops tomorrow at Infowars.com forward slash show at 11 a.m.
Central. Clips are already all over X, formerly Twitter.
But, despite all this incredible news, the deep state, the CIA, has been coming after us and has almost shut us down.
We need funding to keep fighting.
And I make it easy to fund the operation with this new book, The Great Awakening, part two of my last book that was a number one bestseller worldwide.
The Great Reset and the War for the World.
This is The Great Awakening, the plan to defeat the globalists and launch the second great renaissance.
This book is incredible.
It lays out the enemy's plans and how to counter them.
You can get a signed copy that's a fundraiser to keep us on air, a signed copy at Infowarsstore.com exclusively, or an unsigned copy at Infowarsstore.com.
Or if you want to drive it to number one on Amazon, it was like number 25 yesterday, We can do it together at amazon.com.
Get The Great Awakening by Alex Jones right now.
But regardless, join us weekdays at 11 a.m.
Central at infowars.com forward slash show and band.video.
And now on X at the real Alex Jones where my show, Uncensored, is now available thanks to all of you and Tucker Carlson pushing Elon Musk to do the right thing.
This is the fight for our free speech and the fight for the future.
I'll see you all at TheRealAlexJones on Twitter right now.