Vivek Ramaswamy dominated the GOP debate by exposing "great replacement theory," framing January 6th as an inside job, and accusing Big Tech of election interference, while Nikki Haley’s Ukraine stance and climate claims were mocked. Alex Jones’ upcoming Tucker Carlson interview—where he’ll detail globalist plans from PNAC and Agenda 2030—sparked excitement, with 85% of X users voting to unban him after Elon Musk’s call for reinstatement. Meanwhile, Jones urged listeners to shop at InfoWarsStore.com during a Christmas sale, positioning it as resistance against "establishment" censorship and a lifeline for his struggling platform. The episode ties these battles into a broader war over truth, where dissenters claim their warnings about pandemics, wars, and false flags were ignored until events proved them right. [Automatically generated summary]
Really, there's one major conclusion you should come to if you watch the debate or even the debate clips from last night.
Well, there's a couple conclusions.
One... Nikki Haley is done.
That's that for Nikki Haley.
Two, Vivek Ramaswamy is an absolute champion who is just jaw-droppingly powerful in the way he's phrasing things and the topics he's bringing up.
It really is incredible. But I think most importantly is the fact that Vivek Ramaswamy is picking up the torch of the MAGA movement.
And it really represents a watershed moment for the information war.
After all, that's what we're doing here is trying to get the information out.
And I'm reminded of an ancient Buddhist saying that goes, watch your thoughts, they become your words.
Watch your words, they become your actions.
Watch your actions, they become your habits.
Watch your habits, they become your character.
Which is, you know, a warning against having bad thoughts that become bad words, become bad actions.
But it can equally apply to good things.
If you think good thoughts, speak well.
Those become good actions, which becomes good habits, which ends up with a good character.
And as that works on an individual level, I think it works the same on a national level.
And I think for a very long time we've been stuck in the thought mode.
And with the debate last night, even more so than the other debates, more so than other times Vivek Ramaswamy has broken and shattered the Overton window and brought up topics that are of constant discussion here on Infowars and elsewhere on the dissident right.
But hardly, if ever, make it through to the mainstream They truly broke through to the mainstream yesterday with Vivek Ramaswamy, and hopefully it represents that next step of our thoughts now becoming vocalized, becoming words to get into people's mind, to change the action of the government so that we can finally have a government of an upstanding and respectable character rather than a low-down, dirty, deceitful, manipulative, psychopathic character.
So we're not there yet, but we're making strides, and they are big ones.
Big strides towards freeing this country from the grips of globalism, shattering the imposed rhetoric limitations that are on politicians and the average person alike.
This outrageous claim that Roosevelt was this loving pro-American individual when in truth he was a communist lover, he sold his country out to socialism, and he killed 3,000 plus of our men and women at Pearl Harbor on purpose.
unidentified
The attack yesterday on the Hawaiian Islands I want to remind the listeners that we're dealing with our own Pearl Harbors here in America today.
I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost.
I'm just talking about the problem-reaction-solution paradigm.
unidentified
I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States.
A lot of the evidence of government-sponsored terrorism in the past, from Pearl Harbor to the World Trade Center in 93, Waco to Oklahoma City, are on Infowars.com.
Yes, folks, it is a date which has lived in infamy, although now that infamy may well be transmuted to the American government, which it's now well-known and admitted to Knew the Pearl Harbor attacks were coming and in fact imposed intolerable economic sanctions on Japan in order to force their hand and bring us into the war.
A long line of false flags getting Americans into war.
Pearl Harbor of course wasn't the first and was far from the last.
And listing out the false flags that got us into war is more or less the same as simply listing out all of the wars America has been in since the late 1800s.
USS Maine got us into the Spanish-American War.
Total fabrication.
They pulled the wreckage up and learned that the explosion that destroyed the Maine had come from inside the Maine itself, not from outside, from a torpedo or some other bomb.
Lusitania. Which was carrying arms and therefore a valid military target, but done so with the express purpose of luring Japanese U-boats, I mean, I'm sorry, German U-boats, to destroy it, get a massive casualty list, list of dead civilians, in order to get us into World War I. Pearl Harbor was World War II. Vietnam, we had the Gulf of Tonkin.
Korea didn't have a false flag, but we didn't need one because that was the first time that the UN's army actually waged war, not on behalf of a nation, but on behalf of a combined international force under control of the UN. And then, of course, the Gulf Wars and the weapons of mass destruction and 9-11 and all the others.
And since then, Well, they so efficiently organized the war-making machine that they don't even have to false flag anybody if they don't want to.
We're in war in Syria, and of course there was an attempt to accelerate and expand that
war through a false flag in the form of a fake chemical attack that was debunked by
the official observers who found no evidence of the chemical attack, despite the fact that
politicians and media pundits here used it to desperately attempt to get Donald Trump
to involve us deeper in that country.
So it didn't work that time.
The false flag failed that time because Donald Trump outmaneuvered and bamboozled everybody
by pretending to fall for it, but not really.
Well done, Trump, keeping us out of expanded operations in the Middle East.
But it didn't matter.
We still have troops there.
We are still at war in Syria, despite never voting for it.
Ukraine, of course, another false flag attack with the Maidan massacre that was carried
out by Maidan forces in order to perform a coup there.
Obviously America not directly involved in the most literal sense in the war in Ukraine.
But in every other sense, we are, of course, the reason that that country is still continuing to suffer in a state of war.
And now there's increasing evidence of October 7th not only being known about, but may very well have been made worse in a variety of different ways by the Israeli government, who both allowed or perhaps even suggested or compelled the Nova Music Festival to move closer to the border and more in the line of damage, who The Israeli army and military in general did not respond for seven hours.
And when they did respond, they sent Apache helicopters and drones to the area to kill everyone regardless of whether they were Hamas or not, meaning that a very large percentage of the dead civilians on October 7th were in fact killed by Israel themselves.
And it's obvious, right?
Why are false flags necessary?
Part of it has to do with casus belli, the cause of war.
In other words, countries don't want to be perceived as the ones who started the conflict.
They always want to be perceived as responding in order to maintain the moral high ground.
But more important than that is the fact that the people never want war.
The vast majority of Americans, no interest in going to war in World War I, no interest in returning to the continent for World War II, no interest in it until you false flag them, until you get the impetus that you need.
So it's less about having some justification for the war.
After all, if you win the war, you can then go back and rewrite the history more or less to whatever you want it to be.
It has more to do with getting the American public along for the ride.
And I still think that we are in very great danger of experiencing some massive false flag or a real attack.
And that's the other thing is that I guess the definition of false flag has been expanded a little bit or should be expanded a little bit.
Was the attack on Pearl Harbor a false flag in the traditional sense?
Well, no, because the Japanese weren't pretending to be anybody else.
It wasn't American planes bombing Hawaii, flying the Japanese flag.
It was Japan attacking Pearl Harbor.
It was simply orchestrated.
It was an orchestrated false flag.
It was a situation that was designed and allowed to happen by America using Japan to carry out an attack on ourselves.
When you say false flag, it doesn't mean that the attack didn't happen.
It doesn't even necessarily mean that the people perpetrating it were something other than what they were said to be.
What it really means is that it's an orchestrated event in which the leadership of our country causes or outright attacks its own citizens in order to compel those citizens into a state of war that they were otherwise resistant to.
Nothing has changed. Only now, I have to say it's probably significantly easier.
And one thing you have to realize, and everybody sort of knows this, but if you really think about it, war in the future, war in the modern era, isn't even going to be a physical war for the most part.
It's going to be cyber attacks.
It's going to be shutting down grids.
It might be EMPs.
But the methods that technology has opened up in terms of warfare mean that we're sort of on uncharted ground.
In fact, there's a video that was going viral.
I don't think I grabbed it, but it's a common thing that you see not only in Mexican cartels.
This video is a Mexican cartel looking like a paramilitary group in form and function,
And it's the same thing you see South African thieves now have.
So you've got signal jammers on individuals.
So when you go to storm a house, that person's cell phone doesn't work.
They can't call for help.
They can't reach out.
radio to anybody else.
It's just one aspect of a slight change, but from drone warfare to cyber attacks to the worldwide system that can be shut down, war is very different these days.
Alright, welcome back folks.
Time for a bit of a victory lap here.
After all, what we saw yesterday during the Republican debate is real vindication for the stalwart Stan's Info Wars has taken, which is to talk about all of this for decades.
It's finally broken through in a mainstream sort of way.
Another takeaway I should mention from the debate is that Ron DeSantis, did he even talk?
I mean, I didn't even hear anything about him.
Was he even up there?
Everything I heard was about Nikki Haley and Vivek Ramaswamy.
And there's Ron DeSantis standing there in high heels in the middle, wondering where everybody went.
This has been absolutely incredible.
We're going to show you some clips from this.
I should say we're going to be joined by Andrew Meyer a little bit later in this hour, actually.
He's got a plane to catch later, but he's going to be in here for his third appearance on InfoWars today.
We also are going to go to an extended report about Pearl Harbor from the one and only Brian Wilson.
It's now available on Bandai Video, but we'll show you that in full a little bit later in the show.
Lots to talk about in terms of COVID once again, big tech censorship, politics, some major developments in Donald Trump's legal battle.
And a lot more to cover and some very funny videos to get to a little bit later as well.
But let's get into what happened last night at the debate.
Even if you saw some of this, it's worth a re-listen from how good Vivek Ramaswamy is at putting these topics out into the mainstream and forcing his Republican opponents to squirm under the lights of truth, reality, and fearless Let's start with clip number one.
We'll ease our way into it with something that not only you could imagine hearing on InfoWars, I think I may have said this exact same thing during the show yesterday.
It's that the climate change agenda has nothing to do with the climate.
Couldn't be more obvious, but nobody said it up till now.
Here's Vivek Ramaswamy on the climate change agenda.
I'll use this to just address a topic we didn't talk about tonight, but I think is one of the most important topics that needs to be discussed.
That is this climate change agenda that is shackling this country like a set of handcuffs.
I said it the first debate and I stand by it.
The climate change agenda is a hoax because it has nothing to do with the climate.
That's what we have to see. 98% reduction in the climate disaster-related deaths in the last century.
Eight times as many people are going to die of cold temperatures this year than warm ones.
Yet against that backdrop, there's an issue coming up in Iowa.
It's core to Iowa farmers.
I met Kim Junker, Kathy Stockdale and other farmers who are about to have a carbon capture pipeline built across their land using eminent domain to do it.
That's unconstitutional and it's wrong.
And if you thought COVID was bad, what's coming with this climate agenda is far worse.
We should not be bending the knee to this new religion.
That is what it is. It is a substitute for a modern religion.
We are flogging ourselves and losing our modern way of life, bowing to this new god of climate.
And that will end on my watch.
Thank you, Ambassador Haley. It's the most critical issue that's coming up.
I want to say one thing about the tie to Ukraine, if I may.
Foreign policy experience is not the same as foreign policy wisdom.
I want everybody at home to note that I was the first person to say we need a reasonable peace deal in Ukraine.
Now a lot of the neocons are quietly coming along to that position, with the exceptions of Nikki Haley and Joe Biden, who still support this, what I believe is pointless war in Ukraine.
And I think those with foreign policy experience, one thing that Joe Biden and Nikki Haley have in common is that neither of them could even state for you three provinces in eastern Ukraine that they want to send our troops to actually fight for.
Look at that. This is what I want people to understand.
These people have... I mean, she has no idea what the hell the names of those provinces are, but she wants to send our sons and daughters and our troops and our military equipment to go fight it.
So reject this myth that they've been selling you, that somebody had a cup of coffee stint at the U.N. and then makes eight million bucks after, has real foreign policy experience.
It takes an outsider to see this through.
Look at the blank expression.
unidentified
She doesn't know the names of the provinces that she wants to actually fight for.
Of course, that amongst the other absolute, the other examples of absolute domination by Vivek Ramaswamy led to the title of the Infowars article about the debate.
Vivek Ramaswamy stuns Nikki Haley, steals show in fourth GOP presidential debate.
He absolutely did. And obviously it's just pointing to a wider point that these people are trying to send your sons and daughters to die on a foreign battlefield that they know nothing about.
They don't care.
They don't have deep, thorough understanding of the geopolitical reality or the reality on the ground or what's driving the people in Ukraine, what would be behind their urge to fight against it.
They don't know any of that.
They don't care. It doesn't matter to them.
So it's not so much like you don't know the names of the provinces.
You don't know anything.
You don't know anything about what's going on there.
You know nothing about the reality on the ground.
All you know is the propaganda fed to you by the mainstream media, which itself...
It's chock full of complete liars who don't know anything either.
So let's not go to war on this ridiculous basis.
Let's not expand the operation any more than it already has been.
And let's not listen to people who say ridiculous things like clip number two.
Here's Nikki Haley with perhaps the line of the evening.
unidentified
Let's watch. We really do need to ban TikTok once and for all.
And let me tell you why.
For every 30 minutes that someone watches TikTok, Every day, they become 17% more anti-Semitic, more pro-Hamas based on doing that.
We now know that 50% of adults, 18 to 25, think that Hamas was warranted.
Yes, only in the game. Yeah, and they're everywhere, I understand.
Actually, do you want to talk about that?
Because how lizard-like does Mark Zuckerberg look in this picture?
This is a story from today.
Facebook content enabled child sexual abuse, New Mexico lawsuit, and they have this picture of Mark Zuckerberg where, let's face it, folks, the man looks like a lizard.
I mean, I will say, and some people are not going to like this, I do think that some of the more out there conspiracies are given more runway on purpose to discredit everybody, just like you're saying.
And the one that I always think about, some people are not going to like this, but it's Flat Earth.
I really think Flat Earth is a sign-up.
Or one that everyone by now should know, QAnon.
QAnon, obviously...
There are no sealed indictments.
The thousands of sealed indictments that were coming, Jeff Sessions, they're going to round up everybody.
Never freaking happened. So I think by now people have figured out, you know, sometimes the, you know, I'm all for a good conspiracy theory, but you need discernment.
You need high discernment, which you only get from connecting to God.
Otherwise, you know, there's some people that I really like.
I like Scott Adams a lot, but he was fooled by the vaccine and you need the discernment from God.
Otherwise you're going to fall for QAnon or whatever else.
Beautiful. And I remember seeing this video back when it first came out and not understanding it, thinking it was just funny that you were being tased.
Like, I totally did not get it at the time.
It was only later when I actually heard the questions you were asking and...
And actually, like, realize, like, oh, this isn't just a silly thing of a guy being tased.
I can't believe I'm still getting away with it, to be honest with you.
But one thing, because I was watching a little bit of you on Alex, and I always thought that you were asking a question about the Secret Society, the Skull and Bones.
Was that your question, or were you asking about the war and George Bush?
Because I heard you say that on Alex, and I thought, well, I thought he was asking about the Skull and Bones.
Both. I asked him three questions, which people in the audience are like, oh, you have more questions, because I was opening their minds in real time to things that they had never heard, were very suppressed.
The first thing I asked him was about the election, because even back then, there was a lot of election fraud.
There was a website, blackboxvoting.org.
There was an HBO documentary about them exposing that, you know, in Volusia County, Florida, in 2000, there were voting machines that counted backwards.
Mm-hmm. How is that possible?
How do you have a negative amount of votes?
Because they were messing with the election, just like they are now.
Okay, so you know that in this book that I was holding up, there's this election fraud.
Okay, why didn't you contest the election, John Kerry?
You wanted to be president. You know about this election fraud.
Great. Okay, now you're in power now.
At the time, the Democrats had just taken Congress.
Because you were asking about impeaching Bush over his illegal war in Iraq, which I agree with.
And I think probably, if you get right down to it, the number one reason why the establishment hates Donald Trump is because he wasn't going along with the war propaganda, the war agenda.
They want more war. Well, that's what makes Donald Trump different, and that's what makes any of the politicians that are legitimate and are for the people.
Very obviously, there's no reason for us to spend hundreds of billions of dollars in Ukraine, which is all just money laundering for people like Pelosi and Zelensky anyway.
Why would we give away American money to Israel or any other country?
It just ends up in the pockets of the worst people in the world.
So we shouldn't be giving foreign aid to any nation, any nation, and we should not be for these wars that aren't helping anyone.
The war on Palestine isn't helping Israelis.
The war in...
Fighting back against Russia.
It's not helping the Ukrainians.
Their population has been decimated.
Their young people are... I saw some crazy statistic.
I don't even want to repeat because it seemed so far-fetched.
But something like 75% of a certain age bracket of men in Ukraine had been killed.
There's pictures now they're drafting old men to go and fight because they've had such a catastrophe to their population.
That's so funny. But I guess there is that aspect of Alex where even if you don't agree with what he's saying, it's probably because you don't understand it, to be frank, but I guess just the entertainment factor sort of overcomes a lot of people's reticence to engage with this material, which is why I've always found his style, while it's not my personal style, I'm not...
As comfortable as him with a bullhorn in front of people, you like, you know, doing that.
But I totally understand the value of it.
And I appreciate that there at least is somebody out there doing this.
And of course, I'm just thinking of the protest he did against Bilderberg decades ago where he's out there just going, we are not your slaves.
And it's like, good, somebody should be telling them.
Somebody should be letting these people know that we are not their slaves.
You know, there's the Briggs-Myers personality test, breaks down like the 16 different personality types, and the Commander, which Alex probably is.
All the different types are needed, and Alex has a role to play, and you have a role to play, I have a role to play, you at home have a role to play.
And I thank God that Alex is doing his role because there's a lot of people that are not stepping up to the plate.
They're not taking care of America.
They're not taking care of their families.
They're not taking care of themselves. So Alex is a great role model, which is why it's appropriate to put him in a video game and blast him out to kids.
That's a hero. I just love the idea that there are going to be kids who grow up, they play this game, not even realizing that he's a real guy.
To them, he's going to be like the Dune guy, and one day they're going to be, you know, maybe when they're a teenager, somebody's going to go, you know, that's a real guy.
His name's Alex Jones. Like, you should watch some of his videos.
Like, there are going to be people that play this game just for the sheer fun of it, thinking it's just a fun, you know, video game, not realizing Alex Jones is a real flesh-and-blood human being.
Like every week there's a different Torah portion, and there's commentary on the Zohar that corresponds with the different portions of the Torah.
But it's also a discussion between Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, the author of the Zohar, and the other luminaries at the time.
He's a contemporary of Jesus.
And they're discussing great spiritual matters, like the structure of the upper worlds, which, you know, They have names, which I was just alluding to.
And these, when just learning about how the structure of the heavens works, you're putting your mind in the space of God.
God created the world.
You're connecting closer to God just by having that.
I'm interested because I've heard it and we were talking a little bit during the break and we were talking about how the best conversations always happen during the break no matter how hard we try to bring it to the front but of misinterpretations I guess of the Talmud I was saying because you did a big debate with Jake Shields about the Israel conflict and I was saying I watched the first chunk of it and I was waiting to get to the part where you guys disagreed because you were both sort of deplored the violence and the slaughter that was going on on both sides and Both seem to agree on most things.
So I was asking, where did the disagreement come in?
I guess it came over some claims about the Talmud that you were saying weren't true.
Right, and I think, I mean, we have the same thing here with Christian Zionists.
I mean, it just sort of baffles me.
But it does, it's useful to them, right?
Because it lends this sort of biblical, not professorial, but like, that you're fulfilling a prophecy.
And so there are people here in America that, like, they're decent people, they're good, but they would never...
You know, condone bombing children or something, but then, you know, you get them in this mindset of we're bringing Christ back and they're like, oh, well, you know, bombing children, hey, God can be harsh sometimes.
And it's like, it's a fanaticism I see on both sides that I find very, I'm very uncomfortable with the fanaticism of people reading into it.
And people like Netanyahu or George Bush use that fanaticism to, you know, get popular support behind their aims, whether they believe in it or not.
This book I brought, it's called Duties of the Heart, Havot, Halavavot.
The reason I brought this book is this book, you were asking me about different things that are not in the Torah, but they're part of Judaism.
Right. This book is talking about the ways in which you need to love God, love your fellow man.
It elucidates things that aren't necessarily spelled out in the Torah, but it's still part of Torah study.
And one thing it talks about, there's a whole book that's made out of one section of this called The Gate of Trust.
And if you really fully have faith in God, you can hasten the process in your life of when blessings are revealed.
There's only goodness in this world.
There's revealed light and there's concealed light.
So if something seems like, oh, it's not good for you, it's actually just some form of concealed light.
And you can hasten the process of revealing it by having total bitajon, total trust in God.
And the reason I brought that book is because I know what's going on in Israel.
There's so many not doing right.
But the more people actually study, since the camera's on, the more people study the right thing, the closer they'll get to God, the closer that we will be to world peace, and there being no more fighting, but instead, Mashiach, Messiah.
So the people that are using the religious text to justify their, in my opinion, misbehavior or bad deeds, because obviously it's the extremists on both sides, and there's Jewish extremists just like there's Muslim extremists, and a lot of the Jewish extremists, if you ask them, you're like, what gives you the right to do this, whatever it is they're doing, taking land that doesn't belong to them, even the Israeli government's like, you're not allowed to be there, and they're like, screw you, I have a religious duty to do this.
Obviously those people are extremists.
And they used text to justify their actions.
I mean, how would you go about discerning whether the text that they're using is legitimate or not?
Shadi El-Mazri is a Muslim scholar that I've been talking to on Twitter about something like this.
He keeps pointing to that some Jews cite Amalek as a real nation today that we are commanded to go and kill.
Right. And he's like, but here are these rabbis, even extremist rabbis, saying that this is true.
Okay, well, here, look at this source.
It shows you, Amalek today, it's a force of doubt that we need to destroy within ourselves.
If you're doubting that God loves you, if you're doubting that God is real, that is the Amalek that you need to destroy, and you can point to the lineage.
The great rabbis, the great sages, Their names are known.
Rabbi Moshe Chaim Lutzato, Rav Isaac Luria, Rabbi Shimon Bar Yochai.
You need to look at what the actual luminaries of the Torah say, not some extremists.
Like, I wouldn't go to the Westboro Baptist Church to interpret Jesus.
I would look at the words of Jesus.
And I would look at what Origen said.
I wouldn't go to these people who are not luminaries of the faith.
Well, and one thing, I think it was actually the first question or your first answer in the debate with Jake Shields, which is where you basically condemned collective punishment, which I know is – I completely agree with and was glad that you brought that up because obviously Christians don't believe in collective punishment.
But I always understood it was a little bit more lenience in Judaism.
Yeah, and I mean obviously it's the double-edged sword of religion and Jews just like Christians have these sort of outliers that Take things too far, take things too literally, whatever it is, and sort of cause trouble for everybody else.
I mean, do you think – and I'm always sort of amazed at how devout most Jews are.
Like even just going to like sort of secular Jews that I know, you go to their weddings and they're like – It's extremely religious, more so than if you go to a more secularized Christian.
So, I mean, do you think Judaism has a particular issue with extremism?
And we'll answer that on the other side with our final segment with Andrew Meyer, AlexJonesGame.com.
We'll move on to some other topics as well.
We won't stick with this.
All right, folks, we're getting into some deep esoteric knowledge here with Andrew Meyer, AlexJonesGame.com.
This book I brought is called Duties of the Heart.
Havot. I love Havot.
The reason I brought this book is this book, you were asking me about different things that are not in the Torah, but they're part of Judaism.
Right. This book is talking about the ways in which you need to love God, love your fellow man.
It elucidates things that aren't necessarily spelled out in the Torah, but it's still part of Torah study.
And one thing it talks about, there's a whole book that's made out of one section of this called The Gate of Trust.
And if you really fully have faith in God, you can hasten the process in your life of when blessings are revealed.
There's only goodness in this world.
There's revealed light and there's concealed light.
So if something seems like, oh, it's not good for you, it's actually just some form of concealed light.
And you can hasten the process of revealing it by having total bitajon, total trust in God.
And the reason I brought that book is because I know what's going on in Israel.
There's so many not doing right.
But the more people actually study, you know, since the camera's on, the more people study the right thing, the closer they'll get to God, the closer that we will be to world peace, and there being no more fighting but instead Mashiach, Messiah.
Well, So the people that are using the religious text to justify their, in my opinion, misbehavior or bad deeds, because obviously it's the extremists on both sides, and there's Jewish extremists just like there's Muslim extremists, and a lot of the Jewish extremists, if you ask them, what gives you the right to do this, whatever it is they're doing, taking land that doesn't belong to them, even the Israeli government's like, you're not allowed to be there, and they're like, screw you, I have a religious duty to do this.
Obviously those people are extremists.
And they used text to justify their actions.
I mean, how would you go about discerning whether the text that they're using is legitimate or not?
Well, and one thing, I think it was actually the first question or your first answer in the debate with Jake Shields, which is where you basically condemned collective punishment, which I know is – I completely agree with and was glad that you brought that up because obviously Christians don't believe in collective punishment.
But I always understood it was a little bit more lenience in Judaism.
Yeah, and I mean, obviously it's the double-edged sword of religion, and Jews, just like Christians, have these sort of outliers that Take things too far, take things too literally, whatever it is, and sort of cause trouble for everybody else.
I mean, do you think – and I'm always sort of amazed at how devout most Jews are.
Like even just going to like sort of secular Jews that I know, you go to their weddings and they're like – It's extremely religious, more so than if you go to a more secularized Christian.
So, I mean, do you think Judaism has a particular issue with extremism?
And we'll answer that on the other side with our final segment with Andrew Meyer, AlexJonesGame.com.
Andrew Meyer is my guest, the Andrew Meyer on Twitter, the website where you can get the game that he helps to create and get into a full and complete condition, which is a major task, by the way.
Get it at alexjonesgame.com.
That's alexjonesgame.com.
I think it'd make a fantastic Christmas gift for the teenager, young person, or just InfoWarrior in your life.
It's alexjonesgame.com.
It is, frankly, hilarious.
I think it's as much fun to watch as it is to play.
But, you know, I saw you guys months ago when you were working on this.
So much work has gone into it.
It's not... Honestly, you could have gone the easy way.
You could have gone the easy way of, like, just re-skinning a different game.
Like, there are shortcuts you could take to just pump a game out really quick and have it be low quality.
But, like... Every aspect of this game is from the ground up, is unique.
It's not just some random tank sprite that you download off the internet.
It's the Infowars tank that he's driving.
How much work did you guys put in behind the scenes to get it to this point?
It's been two years of development, and you're exactly right.
And gamers are noticing it.
Like, they're making comments. Why is this Alex Jones game better than anything a AAA-rated studio has put out?
Right. Why is this the best game that I've played this year?
Why is it the best game of the decade?
People are really saying this because it really is that good.
It's not just like a meme or a funny video.
It's a great game.
If you don't play video games but you have a kid or a grandkid that does, they're going to love it and you're going to educate the next generation of Alex Jones.
You're going to change the culture giving them this for Christmas.
Absolutely. And I just like it because I just don't have time to get into narrative games these days.
You put in the game, it's 45 minutes until you're actually playing because it's all cinematics.
I just don't have time for that.
I need little arcade games.
And this is what this game is.
You can just pick it up and start playing right off the bat.
Let's go back because we left off the last segment and I was talking about extremism.
And again, I hope people find this conversation interesting.
I know I do. But it's one of the interesting things about Infowars is we can go from like hardcore news and covering just the headlines to like kind of getting into the philosophy and esoteric realm with no holds barred and no...
No worries about, I hope, you know, like, offending one another because, like, we both totally understand that we're both on exactly the same page of defeating the globalists, stopping the war.
They're anti-human scum and must be defeated by any means necessary.
And, you know, if we have to have...
conversations or conflicts to figure out how to best defeat them, then that's what we're here to do and hopefully we can continue that.
So the Jewish extremism, I mean I see a lot of it out there just like I see Christian extremism, but it's troubling and I feel like we're not allowed to talk about it Especially now with the Congress saying anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism and anti-Semitism laws in places like Florida.
I don't like the abridgment of our free speech, and I think that's a big issue that I would like to see more Jews speak out on and say you don't silence people for our sake.
I did a debate with Owen Benjamin about four years ago because he was starting to notice a lot, and he was talking a lot about Jews, and we had a really great discussion.
And one thing that he pointed out, just like you said, is that Jews were a sacred cow, not allowed to be talked about.
I don't want that. I want more discussion.
The more discussion there is about the Torah or Jews or Judaism, then the closer we get to...
Making things better. If you don't allow conversation about something, you stultify it, you make it literally retarded.
It's better for everyone to have a fully formed conversation about here's the good, here's the bad.
For example, people like to talk about the crime statistics in the black community.
They like to talk about the problem with fathers not being in the home.
If you don't have that discussion, you don't get to Larry Elder talking about how, oh, the government actually designed this problem.
Plot to take fathers out of the home through government welfare.
It was intentional. They want to destroy their family.
If you don't have the conversation, how dare you talk about crime in the black community, you don't get to the root of the problems and how things can be made better.
So I'm happy to talk about here are the issues in my community.
Hopefully it makes things better.
Yeah. You know, I'm not some self-hating Jew.
I love being a Jew. And I want more Jews to realize, hey, we have to be, like, great to other people.
It's not just, there's a lot of Jews that just think that it's okay to be good to other Jews.
We have to be loving brothers to our Christian brothers and our Muslim brothers, too.
And don't think that you're so high and mighty just for being a Jew.
You're supposed to serve humanity, not be served by it.
And that's the double-edged sword, isn't it, is that these same tactics that serve to sort of separate Jews from everybody else both keeps – it keeps them separate and in a way keeps them easily – more easily controlled if you have like social pressure that says like don't do that.
You'll offend the Jews as if one person can speak for an entire group of people.
But it's – It's always a double-edged sword.
You keep both groups in line by separating them, keeping them separate, not talking to one another.
And you might use the same sort of claims to keep both people down.
And it's a complicated issue because it's not like you can say, this is all BS. Most of my friends had grandparents that fled Europe to get away from the Nazis, fled the Holocaust.
I can't sit there and go, your fear is unwarranted.
It's like, Okay, their grandparents had to run away in the middle of the night.
It's not unwarranted. So you have to appreciate the way that a lot of these topics are used to both keep white people, like you are not allowed to have a nationality because otherwise it leads to the Holocaust.
It's like, well, that's kind of ridiculous. And the Jews saying you're not allowed to fraternize with the white people because they want to kill you.
I mean, it's keeping both people separated and controlled.
Well, I'm going to – I'm happy to read it and look into it because I do think that there – and we were talking about this a little bit during the break.
Like, there is an aspect of like, oh, when you just hear about, if you don't know any
Jewish people and you just hear about the Jews as something on TV, you know, it's some
people making decisions somewhere, you can very easily get a wrong view of what Jewish
people are like.
Whereas if you played Little League with them or went to school with a Jewish person, they're
not some force out there.
In the same way that if you don't live around black people, you can easily get an idea of
black people as a criminal race because that's all you hear on the media.
And we have to break those preconceptions down.
I think that that really is a valuable thing.
And I completely agree with what you say about America.
I think it's so sort of tragic that you've got, you know, people, I mean, look at like,
you know, It's a Wonderful Life or some of these like amazing Christmas movies from the
It was Jewish people that put them together because they had a genuine love of the American system because they experienced what it was like in Europe before and during the Second World War.
They come to America. They're like, this is amazing.
Nobody hates me here.
I love this place. Only to see like their grandchildren be like, America's white supremacist and evil.
It's tragic to me. Yeah, the people accusing, the Jews accusing people, like the ADL, accusing people of anti-Semitism.
They're creating anti-Semitism.
They're doing it on purpose.
They know that this is part of the phenomenon.
It's literally their business model.
They want to create hatred so that they can make money off it.
And on a deeper level, the globalists want that hatred so that they can get away with war.
They need consent for war.
That's what Jake Shields and I were disagreeing about.
If there's nobody hating the Palestinians or hating the Jews, they don't have consent for war, which they require.
They can't just go to war unless the people agree with it.
That's why you're doing the false flags and showing they had to get the American people wanting to go into World War II. So if you don't hate anybody, there's not going to be any war.
If everybody's like, you know what, I love my brother, I love my fellow man...
We're going to have peace. Yeah, and it doesn't mean that you have to either—it also doesn't mean you have to abandon those things that make you different.
It doesn't mean that we all have to have the same religion in order to get along, which I think is really the ultimate globalist plan, right, is for them saying, well, different religions leads to war.
Different countries leads to war.
It needs to be all one world government with one religion under one leader, and that's the ultimate goal, which is not necessary.
It's a false dichotomy.
It's a false— I mean, these things are so simple, aren't they?
The false flags, the problem-reaction solution, the divide and conquer.
We know these things, and yet we can't seem to stop falling for them.
But of course, thank you so much to Andrew Meyer for coming on.
And of course, for making the game, the Alex Jones game, AlexJonesGame.com, NWOWars.
Go get it now.
We're going to play a song.
He did leave us with a song, so we're going to play that on the other, just a little bit later
in this segment.
But I was going to go to it right now, but I got interrupted by some very good breaking news.
In fact, while I was talking to Andrew, I did notice that trending on Twitter
is Alex Jones, which happens so often.
I don't even pay attention anymore.
But there's a very good reason why Alex Jones is trending on Twitter.
Not only is the Tucker Carlson Alex Jones interview dropping
later tonight, but it's getting attention from a lot of people, including Elon Musk.
ALX has reposted a video.
We'll play this video in just a second.
It was uploaded by Erica Jones, Alex's wife.
A little statement of Alex making a statement about the interview with Tucker Carlson.
ALX retweets it saying, Alex Jones says he hopes Elon Musk will watch his interview with Tucker Carlson on X tonight.
Elon Musk responds, I will hear him out.
I will hear him out this week.
Could be very big. And not only that, actually, as soon as Elon Musk says, I will hear him out, ALX responds saying, thank you.
Owen, at All I Do is Owen, was also banned by 1.0, by Twitter 1.0, at the behest of Media Matters, the people that Elon Musk is now in a death struggle with.
He says for telling people to go to a protest that would, quote, violate social distancing orders.
So there he is advocating for Owen Schroer to get back on as well.
The quartering. Gotten in on this, saying, think about how much letting Alex Jones back on X would make the machine rage, Elon Musk.
It's time. Elon Musk responds, we'll consider.
In general, since this platform aspires to be the global town square, permanent ban should be extremely rare.
Also, if he does say something false on this platform, then community notes will correct him, whereas that would not be the case elsewhere.
Let's hold a poll. Oh, so it looks like...
up so I'll need to participate and retweet this. Perhaps I'll do it while I
show you the video that all of this is is responding to.
Ian Miles Chong put out a poll should Alex Jones be unbanned on X? 85% saying yes,
14% saying no.
Ian Miles Chong says this is a poll in response to Elon's post asking
if Alex Jones should be allowed back on X. Elon Musk says I guess a lot of people
want him unbanned.
Well, this could be a very, very good day, folks, if Elon Musk lets Alex Jones back on.
There's been a lot of discussion about Alex Jones being banned recently.
People are always asking Elon Musk, get him back on.
Anytime Elon Musk talks about what a free speech platform Twitter is, people remind him, except for Alex Jones, except for Owen Schroyer, you've kicked them off.
And of course, Elon Musk's response in the past was he was so outraged by the statements Alex Jones made about Sandy Hook that he couldn't have it, as if that was the reason he was kicked off of Twitter.
And a lot of people are reminding him, no, he was kicked off Twitter for making fun of Oliver Darcy.
He was kicked off of Twitter for saying that Oliver Darcy, CNN correspondent, media correspondent, looked like a raccoon that had just climbed out of a cow's butt.
I should know. I filmed that interaction, believe it or not.
One of my proudest moments, I think, a historical moment even, that went down there in the halls of Congress with Alex Jones suddenly seeing Oliver Darcy honing in on him and telling him exactly what he thought in a very appropriate way.
He didn't threaten him or anything, but they used that excuse.
They called it bullying and kicked him off for daring to speak back against Oliver Darcy, who himself had made a career out of advocating to get people like Alex Jones banned from the platform.
It's almost full circle. Alex Jones confronts him about it, and he actually gets banned for that interaction.
Same thing, Owen Schroyer.
He wasn't kicked off for hate speech.
He wasn't kicked off for violent rhetoric.
He was kicked off for supporting a protest in opposition to lockdown measures, which we now know incontrovertibly did nothing to prevent the spread of COVID, were in fact hugely damaging on a number of different levels.
He was right the entire time.
Both Alex and Owen should be back.
Make no bones about it.
It looks like They just might.
So all of this is in response to a one and a half minute little promo video that Alex put out earlier today or maybe put it out last night.
But this is clip number 12 here.
This is the video where all this discussion is centering around.
Tucker Carlson is going to drop a two hour interview this evening that he conducted with yours truly.
Just a few weeks ago in Maine.
It's an in-depth interview. We cover the reality of what I've actually said on air, not edited sound bites out of context.
I want to thank Tucker Carlson for his courage.
When you've been deplatformed, the mainstream corporate media, the establishment, the CIA, and the Justice Department that runs all this illegally can then misrepresent who you are and really steal your identity.
So I'm indebted to Tucker Carlson, as is the rest of our country and the world, for standing against the inflation, the wars, the open borders.
The assault on American culture, the assault on families.
So, Tucker Carlson, again, is taking his defense of free speech to the next level.
Now, Elon Musk says he's a free speech absolutist, but still hasn't let me back on Twitter with my own channel.
I'm not even mad at Elon Musk.
I understand he's done as much as he thinks he can, but I hope Elon will watch this interview and actually hear from me why I was really banned on Twitter before he bought it, not for the false reasons he's given.
They set the precedent with Alex Jones to start the dominoes falling to take all of our free speech.
And Tucker Carlson understands that.
So I salute Tucker Carlson.
I thank him and I congratulate him on being 10 times more successful since he got fired from Fox for, again, standing up to the poison shots and so much more.
So I thank Tucker Carlson, I thank his crew, and I thank all of you for sharing this interview that's going to drop sometime this evening on X on Tucker's main Twitter channel.
Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Elon Musk teaming up to defeat the machine.
And I really do love the way the quartering put this.
Think about how much letting Alex Jones back on X would make the machine rage.
And if that's what Elon Musk wants to do, this is one way he can do it.
It is an absolute win-win situation for Elon Musk.
After all, Alex Jones has been right about pretty much everything up to this point.
And the only reason they want to ban him is because he stands in the way of their despicable globalist plans.
So destroy them, Elon.
Let Alex Jones back on.
And let's free humanity.
Now I want to end with this video.
Andrew Meyer suggested we play this.
It is a video about the Alex Jones game, which is available at AlexJonesGame.com.
unidentified
Let's watch. Sir, we have some terrible news.
What? Tell me the news.
Don't preface it with some sort of state.
You might want to be sitting down for this.
You can see I'm sitting down.
I'm clearly sitting down.
Alex Jones has made a new video game.
What? How can he make a video game?
He has negative ability and half and dollars.
Alex Jones is the s***.
It's something you would never say if you don't know much about him because you only read Mike Jones needs to make over a billion dollars to square things up and make everything, Even Steven, so he looked up things to do to make a billion
I told you we're winning, folks. Didn't I tell you?
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
You know, I was planning to take a break from the debate coverage and then get right back to it, but so much is happening on Twitter right now with Elon Musk.
We've got to extend the break a little bit further.
More things unfolding before us here.
So as you saw, The Quartering retweeted the video we just watched of Alex Jones saying, think about how much letting Alex Jones back on X would make the machine rage its time.
Tagging Elon Musk.
Elon Musk responds, we'll consider.
In general, since his platform aspires to be a global town square, permanent ban should be extremely rare.
Plus, community notes, we'll be able to correct him if he says anything wrong in the future.
Don't count on it. Then Texas Lindsey responds to that.
Explaining why Alex was suspended in the first place, saying Alex Jones was suspended by Twitter 1.0 for saying CNN's Oliver Darcy, quote, had the eyes of a rat.
Ironically, as Paul Thacker and I uncovered in the Twitter files, Oliver Darcy was essentially an informant for Twitter 1.0, secretly flagging tweets while employed as a CNN, quote, journalist.
And Elon Musk has actually responded to that saying this is certainly not a valid reason for suspension.
So all signs point to Alex Jones being let back on.
I guess we'll have to wait to find out until after the premiere of the two-hour interview between Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson.
And I would really, really like to see this interview with Tucker Carlson and Alex Jones.
Be the most watched interview yet.
Let's be honest. Tuck Carlson came out very strong.
His first uploads, his first live streams after being fired from Fox were on X. They were unbelievably huge.
They were absolutely massive. His viewership is still very large, still getting more views on Twitter or X than he ever did on mainstream cable news.
So still getting a ton of views.
They've tapered off a little bit.
It was, for the first few uploads, for the first few videos, every one he did was like an event that everybody watched and shared and talked about.
The interviews are still bombshell.
They're still incredible. He's still interviewing very important people like Douglas Mackey or Thomas Massey, a lot of people that don't get time to talk about their views in the mainstream media.
Tucker Carlson's giving them a platform, still getting massive views.
But I want to break the internet here.
I think Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, this interview, needs to get 10, 20 million views in one night.
If anything's going to convince Elon Musk to bring him back on, that's going to be it.
Who knows? Maybe we can be streaming this show directly to an official Twitter platform one day very soon in the future.
I like seeing it.
It is absolutely fantastic.
He says he'll hear him out.
And there's no reason why he shouldn't.
I'm just scrolling through Elon Musk's responses here.
And it's like he's responding to end wokeness.
He's responding to ALX. He's responding to Ashley St.
Clair. I mean, everyone he interacts with is a right-wing pundit.
Why would you not let the king of the right wing back on?
And here's the information from Gregory in honor of Tucker's upcoming interview with Alex Jones, a reminder of why Jones was banned on Twitter all the way back in 2018.
He pointed out that CNN's Oliver Darcy, quote, has the eyes of a rat.
Love to see the community note on that one.
It wouldn't exist. And there's the official announcement from all the way back on September 6th, 2018.
Today we permanently suspended at RealAlexJones and at Infowars from Twitter and Periscope.
We took this action based on new reports of tweets and videos posted yesterday that violate our abusive behavior policy in addition to the account's past violations.
And there's the headline from Drudge.
The day that the mask dropped and the censorship program was rolled out in earnest.
And look at that stylish Casio watch there on the far left.
The guy holding the iPhone's filming that.
It's a calculator watch, and I got it for my birthday.
That's right, yours truly on the front page of Drudge.
I've got a new Casio watch.
It's also gold.
It's also vintage.
What a time to be alive, and it could really be a wonderful thing to have Elon Musk let Alex Jones back on.
And I continue to be impressed with Elon Musk.
I continue to support him.
What can I say? And while we're on it, let's get to another little...
A little interaction that Elon Musk had earlier today or perhaps yesterday.
Facebook content enabled child sex abuse.
This according to a New Mexico lawsuit.
New Mexico sued Meta Platforms and its CEO Mark Zuckerberg, alleging that the company's
platforms enabled child sex abuse material to be distributed and failed to identify alleged
predator networks.
The suit was brought after an undercover investigation allegedly revealed myriad instances of sexually
explicit content being served to minors, child sexual coercion, or the sale of child sexual
abuse material, or CSAM, new Mexico Attorney General Raul Torres said in a press release.
So they're actually being sued for allowing this to happen.
you And you understand that when they allow this to happen, they are allowing it to happen.
You understand that lizard man over here, he's got the oversight board.
He's got the algorithms.
You try to upload something positive about Alex Jones and it gets struck down immediately because that's the capabilities that they have, which means they have the capability to recognize and eliminate child abuse material as well.
They just don't employ it.
It's not as important to them.
It's more important to them, and you can read into this however you like, it's more important to them to silence
dissenting political opinions, to crush nascent political movements, than it is to stop the literal ongoing abuse of
children.
That's their priorities and they should be held to account for it.
They have the capabilities.
And this is what I say about almost everything the globalists do.
It's not even that the technological tools that they have are inherently bad.
It's not inherently, well, obviously it's an abuse of privacy, but it's not like
the censorship capability is in and of itself evil.
If it's being used to stop child exploitation, use it.
You could save children by the thousands if that's what they use it for.
But they get these things by claiming, well, we'll be able to stop child exploitation.
We'll be able to stop violent terrorist attacks from going forward.
And then instead, they use those capabilities to target Alex Jones, to target Owen Schroer, to target yours truly from saying perfectly true things about the ways that they're manipulating us, like how Owen Schroer got kicked off for advocating violence.
Ignoring COVID lockdowns, which was a perfectly reasonable and in fact heroic thing to do at the time.
His account was banned with hundreds of thousands of followers.
He still hasn't received it back.
Maybe that will come following Alex Jones getting back on, which we look forward to a little bit later.
And the other thing is that you got to understand...
What Texas Lindsay was saying there in the tweet that I just read where Oliver Darcy was a tattletale.
He was a professional snitch, right?
This is one of these types of people, kind of like pedophiles, that there is no society.
There's no culture. There's no group of human beings in history who has held in their heart love and appreciation for snitches.
It just doesn't exist.
Nobody likes it. It's like an inhuman thing to do.
To be a snitch, to be a tattletale, to be a servant of evil powers because they pat you on the head and reward you for your quizzling hood.
Nobody likes this.
Nobody likes them. But you have to realize he uses that power that he's given as a suckling parasite of the demons to prevent people from making fun of him.
He's not using it for the betterment of society.
He's using it to stop big mean Alex Jones for pointing out how rat-like his visage is.
And this is what these people do.
They take the power that they receive from being little quizling succubus tattletales.
And they use it to protect themselves and their ego and to stop...
Criticism of them and their policies and their beliefs has nothing to do with stopping anything bad like, I don't know, child abuse material, which Facebook allowed to run rampant on its platform more than anywhere else.
Elon Musk responds to the story about the...
Lawsuit against Meta and Facebook.
He says, crazy that Disney has to be sued to stop this terrible behavior, as Colin Ruggs on Twitter points out that there's Disney advertising being placed on some of these pages, which again, when it's placed next to anti-Semitism, you've got billion dollar boycotts.
Oh, there's thousands of child abuse examples going on?
Well, that's fine. We'll keep advertising on that.
That's not our priority. That's not our concern.
Do you feel it, ladies and gentlemen?
Do you feel the shift in energy?
Can you even comprehend the victories that we are racking up one after another?
Vivek Ramaswamy wiping the floor with his GOP Rhino Conservative competition.
By pointing out the great replacement program, the inside job aspect of January 6th, pointing out things that we've talked about here on InfoWars.
Since they began, since they started, he said climate change will be worse than COVID. That only makes sense if you understand the worst part about COVID was the measures forced down from on high from the World Economic Forum and other globalist confabulations that forced humanity into unwise, misguided, and hugely damaging attempts to prevent COVID. I mean, think about how thoroughly the InfoWars mindset, the InfoWars anti-globalist agenda has broken through the mainstream in that alone.
Think about the failing of the mainstream media outlets, the left-wing media outlets, Vice, Vox, Washington Post.
Washington Post had a huge walkout.
All their writers are on strike right now because they learned that some of them are about to be fired because nobody's reading their, well, despicable rag anymore.
Jezebel, shut down for good.
The left-wing media establishment is crumbling before our eyes.
At the very same time, Alex Jones and Owen Schroer look like they may be back on Twitter.
Owen Schroer getting out of prison, more popular than ever before.
Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson teaming up to release a bombshell two-hour interview later this evening.
This is the result of sticking to the truth, sticking to your guns, not backing down, never capitulating, never changing the tactic, just remaining steadfast in our belief that telling the truth with enough emphasis will eventually break through and the world will respond.
And that's war.
That's warfare. There's a reason this is called Info Wars.
Yes, info is part of it, but that second part is war, right?
It's an information war.
We're fighting in the realm, in the battlefield of the mind, trying to win people's hearts and minds by telling them the truth, by exposing the lies, by shattering the deception that keeps people enslaved.
That's part of it. But to win a war, you don't kill the other side.
Wars don't end when every soldier is dead on one side of the battlefield.
It ends when morale collapses to a place where that side surrenders.
That's why I've always...
Considered a part of my role here on InfoWars, as well as probably the most valuable thing Alex Jones does on a daily basis is keep people's morale up, keep people from ingesting the black pill, rejecting the black pill, understanding that humanity is infinitely powerful.
We can easily sweep these people aside if our will is there, if we understand the gravity of the situation that we're in and we act appropriately.
All of this can be over.
All of this death and destruction is a matter of choice and all we have to do is change the landscape of the argument and that choice becomes obvious and it's not the way things have been going for the last little while.
So keeping morale up, it is the most important part of war.
Napoleon himself has a quote where he says morale is ten times as important as the physical when it comes to war.
A small group of people with hardly any arms and No strategy but have high morale will defeat a much larger force, well-armed and well-deployed, nine times out of ten because the morale is so important.
We keep the morale up. But the other part of war is you have to understand, and you can look at something like chess, which is a simulation of war in a lot of ways.
It's about who gets the king first, but more importantly, it's about who's left on the board at the end of the day.
It's who refuses to give up, who still has pieces on the board at the end of the day.
And that's the same with war.
It's not about killing your enemy.
It's about outlasting your enemy.
And Alex Jones, through Ban.Video, through InfoWarsStore.com and your support, has maintained the line For the last five years.
It's been five years since we were kicked off of Twitter.
Five years since we were simultaneously censored from every social media platform.
A crushing blow to our bottom line.
We're making a lot of money on YouTube.
We're making a lot of, we're reaching a lot of people and making a lot of money on social media.
They took all of that away from us.
We survived. They launched lawsuit after lawsuit.
We are surviving. They've criticized and Demonized us endlessly in the mainstream media We are more powerful now than ever And that's thanks to you.
That's thanks to your support.
That's thanks to your steadfastness as much as it is ours.
So thank you so much for going to InfoWarsStore.com.
Please keep it up. Please keep us in the fight.
We will not give up.
We will not give in. And you can see it's paying dividends.
We are succeeding.
We are roaring back to life here at this most crucial time ahead of 2024, the most important presidential election of our history.
And InfoWars is here to lead the way.
Thanks to you, go on InfoWarsStore.com.
Get TurboForce. It's back in stock.
It's incredible. It tastes great.
It's incredible energy.
Long-lasting. No crash.
Better and cheaper than energy drinks.
What excuse do you have not to be drinking TurboForce?
Add it to your coffee if you're crazy.
If you really want to take things to the edge, you know, add it.
Put a scoop of turbo force in your energy drink.
Don't do that. No, don't do that.
I'm sorry. There's a doctor in my ear telling me that's too powerful.
It's just too powerful and we can't have InfoWarriors doing that.
That's just not possible.
TurboForce Plus is now back in stock and on sale.
And again, folks, just do the math.
How many servings are in a single canister?
A lot.
I don't know exactly how many, but it's a lot of servings.
And when you realize how expensive even small energy drinks are,
you know, Red Bull 12 ounces are like five, six bucks.
It's crazy how expensive energy drinks are.
You're getting better energy with TurboForce at a fraction of the cost.
So save money, get energy, mental clarity.
It really is an incredible product on sale right now during the Christmas sale at Infowarsstore.com where you're also getting double Patriot points and free shipping and you're keeping us on the air and in the fight and it's like you're buying war bonds In this information war, victory is in our grasp.
It really is something incredible.
And I'm absolutely invigorated and pumped up from the developments that we're seeing on Twitter with Elon Musk.
Having an open mind about letting back Alex Jones.
It really is incredible.
We'll go to some more clips of the debate, although maybe we'll just cover some other stuff.
But I haven't gotten to the best clips yet.
But before we do that, let's just keep the energy up here and do some fun.
Well, you know what? While we're talking about winning constantly, let's go now to clip number nine.
Here's Boris Johnson leaving a building after two days of questioning at the COVID inquiry in the U.K., And if you listen closely, you'll hear the crowds just off camera chanting, murderer, murderer.
unidentified
Let's watch. The prime minister, former prime minister, and he spent the day under scrutiny once again, also dismissing the perception of Partygate, what people's perception of what was going on in Downing Street.
There's protesters shouting, murderer, murderer, as he leaves the COVID inquiry.
And there on the gate, I believe, are victims of the vaccine and the vaccine catastrophe that they've wrought on us.
So the awakening really is happening.
The people are waking up.
As much as the media wants to ignore it, as much as the elites try to downplay it, They understand as well as you and I do that the earth is shaking underneath their feet as humanity wakes up and becomes alert and aware of their plans, their deceptions, and their despicable behavior.
Let's go now to clip number 15.
This was, again, it was like I spoke this into existence.
I said yesterday while we were talking with Josh Lekic about dinks, about the dink menace, that we should do a parody of it, just talking about what the reality that awaits dinks really is.
These videos are the same every time.
It's dinks being like... I'm a dink and I get to eat candy all the time.
I'm a dink and I get to go to a movie if I want as if people with kids are just dead.
As if we're just like can't ever go outside or have fun and have no money.
It is the deep state that at least Donald Trump attempted to take on.
And if you want somebody who's gonna speak truth to power, then vote for somebody who's gonna speak the truth to you.
Why am I the only person on the stage, at least, who can say that January 6th now does look like it was an inside job?
That the government lied to us for 20 years.
About Saudi Arabia's involvement in 9-11.
That the great replacement theory is not some grand right-wing conspiracy theory, but a basic statement of the Democratic Party's platform.
That the 2020 election was indeed stolen by Big Tech.
That the 2016 election, the one that Trump won for sure, was also one that was stolen from him by the national security establishment.
That actually put up the Trump-Russia collusion hoax that they knew was false.
There's a reason why I'm the only person on the stage who can say these things.
That's what it's going to take, not people who were licking his boots one time and now Monday morning quarterbacking and criticizing when it's convenient.
I mean, that was brilliant. That was absolutely brilliant.
Vivek Ramaswamy bringing up January 6th, bringing up 9-11, bringing up the 2020 election being
stolen and the 2016 election all but being stolen.
The effects of it being, the outcome of it being stolen by the lie of Russia collusion.
These are the biggest topics that should be discussed by every Republican every time they're
on camera.
They're all scared.
They're scared to do it.
They're bootlickers.
They are scumbags.
They are really traitors in the most fundamental way.
He expands on this on Twitter saying the conspiratization of the great replacement theory is a standard left-wing playbook.
Transparently advance a toxic policy, then label it conspiracy theory when the other side contests the merits of it.
We need a real debate on whether intentionally facilitating mass illegal migration to change this country is good for America or not, because that's exactly what's happening.
I think it's bad, but if the left believes this is a good thing, they should make the case for it.
I'm just so happy that he said this.
I'm so happy that this is the way he's approaching this.
There's a mainstream, popular political candidate who is making this case, which needs to be made because it's not just a great replacement, right?
It's things like transgender surgeries for children.
They tell you that's not happening while also bragging about how it's happening.
They talk about demographic change and how great it is while telling you you're a conspiracy theorist for pointing it out.
They do it time and time again.
enough, we need to stop arguing on their grounds and need to start talking about these things
with the reality that they deserve.
My one criticism, my one suggestion would be instead of calling it the Great Replacement
Theory, because it's not a Great Replacement Theory, call it Replacement Migration.
Because when people search the Great Replacement, they find, oh the Great Replacement is a right
It's been debunked, blah, blah, blah.
When you search replacement migration on Google, the number one result is a UN document, an official UN white paper explaining the program ad nauseum.
It's not a conspiracy theory.
It is a published policy of the UN and the Democratic Party.
So good on Vivek Ramaswamy for bringing this up in an appropriate way.
Let's go down to clip number three. Here's CNN's Van Jones responding to the fact that Vivek Ramaswamy simply brought this topic up.
Let's watch. And the smug, condescending way that he just spews this poison out is very, very dangerous because he won't stop Trump, but he's going to outlive Trump by about 50 years.
And you're watching the rise of an American demagogue that is a very, very despicable person.
And literally, I was shaking listening to him talk because a lot of people don't know that is one step away from Nazi propaganda coming out of his mouth.
A lot still to cover in this final hour of The War Room.
And let's stick with migration, shall we?
Because as we've pointed out, oh, many times before, this is not exclusive to America, this process, this policy, this genocidal program of mass replacement, replacement to migration, as the UN puts it.
It's a worldwide – well, it's a Europe-wide phenomenon.
It's a phenomenon in white countries and exclusively white countries.
And just like the UN admits its replacement migration, admits and names its own policy replacement migration, we've seen that – wait, what is this?
InfoWars host, when you turn on Fox News now, it sounds a lot more like InfoWars than it did 10 years ago.
Heck yeah. Media matters.
Shout me out for my appearance on Stu Peters.
Good to hear. Good to see.
It's absolutely true.
It's absolutely true.
How fun. I'll have to bookmark that.
I'll bookmark that along with the other...
Hit pieces against me.
Media matters.
Scumbags. I say a lot crazier things, you know.
I say a lot more objectionable things, I think.
Media matters. Sorry, got a little distracted by that.
I wonder if they're like, we're going to put out a hit piece on this guy.
I'm just like, tight. Cool.
I like it. Anyway, you can go watch that Stu Peters interview on Rumble on Stu Peters' channel, or you can find it on my Twitter feed a little ways down.
If you scroll down there, it's very fun to go on with him.
We talked about Owen Schroer, but we talked about a lot of other stuff, including...
The changing media landscape and how Fox News does indeed sound a heck of a lot like Infowars does.
Just like the presidential debates sound an awful lot like Infowars talking points.
Just like if you go to a TPUSA event, there's not a lot of talk about tax brackets.
There's not a lot of talk about I don't know anything that they used to talk about.
It's all anti-globalism.
It's all these people are anti-human.
The rhetoric now is firmly Alex Jonesian across the board because he's been right the entire time and people are finally waking up to it.
And that's a beautiful thing.
So I'm sorry I was distracted.
Let's get back to the matter at hand.
The great replacement. White erasure.
White genocide. Whatever you want to call it.
Whatever Media Matters doesn't want me to call it.
That's what it is. And of course it's happening to an outrageous degree here in America, a truly unimaginable degree in a lot of ways, with more people crossing the border since Biden's inauguration than all but like five or six states.
You know, it was at a time like Senator Kennedy saying, that's like the state of Nevada coming across.
Well, now it's like every state except for California and Texas, New York and a few others.
So importing entire nations worth of people in just a few years with no oversight, no
plan, no reason to do it except that it's a deliberate policy of replacement.
And that's the fact.
And they admit it if you just listen to them or read their white papers or read their articles.
As we pointed out in Ireland, they've said things like we need four million migrants
in 10 years to keep up the pension program.
Now, Ireland is an island of 5 million people, and they want to bring in 4 million people.
Gee, what's that look like?
An awful lot like a replacement, but don't take it from me.
Take it from Irish politicians who say it...
Beyond any doubt, who say it blatantly, actually.
Clip number 10, here's the Irish government stating explicitly that their policy is to replace the aging working class in Ireland with foreigners to uphold the economy.
Because the economy isn't there to serve the people.
The people are there to serve the economy.
The economy is not a natural outgrowth of people's desires and just a natural consequence of trade and politics.
You know, purchasing and merchandise.
It's a Ponzi scheme that people are there to serve.
And if the people aren't serving it, then they're to be replaced with something that serves the economy better.
But there's a little hick in this plan.
There's a little mistake they've made.
And we'll highlight that in just a second.
But first, here's the Irish government laying it out for you.
Don't take my word for it, take theirs.
unidentified
We have an aging population which means that the proportion of working age people is shrinking.
If we don't have enough workers, who will keep the economy going?
Staff our hospitals, pay the taxes needed to fund public services for older and vulnerable persons.
Inward migration is absolutely key to plugging this gap.
Of your population. You know, Do I even need to point out the fact that they are engaged in a depopulation program supposedly to save the climate and that the modern phenomenon of lowered population, not even necessarily the worst thing.
It's almost a natural balancing act where the more prosperous and technologically advanced your country becomes, the lower your birth rate is.
It's made up for by the fact that you have advanced medical technology.
People are living longer.
You don't have to have a ton of kids because your kids aren't dying at the rate that they would be 100 years ago.
It would kind of be okay if people just left it alone.
If there wasn't this Ponzi scheme of the pension program or Social Security that necessitated bringing more people in and having more workers, it's all predicated on infinite growth, which is impossible.
So it's a fantasy that they've embroiled us all in.
That they now need to replace us and of course they aren't pushing for increasing the Irish birth rate which would be the obvious solution.
That's too easy.
No, they'd rather bring in 10,000 Algerians and replace 10,000 Irish people who are retiring or going out of the workforce.
Here's where it really falls apart.
Places like Sweden, France, Germany, they've done this.
This was the reasoning behind their migration programs.
Well, we need to prop up the pension program.
The problem is all the migrants go on welfare.
None of them actually work and contribute to the pension program.
So now places like Sweden and France have had to increase the retirement age.
So now you can't retire and can't claim your pension because you're needed to work to pay for all the welfare drains that have...
Come into your country. And it's exactly the same in Ireland.
Here's a short video clip number 14.
Here's all the welfare migrants queuing up in Ireland to collect their weekly payment.
For arriving. These are the people that you're bringing in for the stated purpose of propping up your pension program?
Well, we've got to have these working-age guys.
Well, the working-age guys you're bringing in aren't getting jobs, and they're all living off the dole, meaning not only are they not contributing to the pension program, they're draining the resources that you do have.
So there's no way this is really the reason they're doing this, because it makes less sense than anything.
Here's a little quick video, and you can just see the, you know, hundreds of African dudes lining up at the Irish Welfare Office to collect their weekly check.
Here it is. Just hanging around.
Just hanging around, and the line extends out the door and goes around the block.
There you go. The new Irish queuing up for the weekly dole of Irish people's money when the whole reason they're being brought in ostensibly is to work and prop up the economy.
Instead, they are drains on it, just like they are here in America, where the hundreds of thousands or tens of thousands of migrants in New York, 2% of them have even applied for work permits.
The rest are living off the We'll talk more about that on the other side.
Tucker Carlson, 17 minutes ago, unleashed the Alex Jones interview, episode 46.
The Alex Jones interview from Tucker Carlson on X. He talks about predictions, deplatforming, dividing us on race, the border, living in Austin, the New World Order, Brian Stelter demon video, depopulation, food, whiskey, and the presidential election.
The whole thing is an hour and 30 minutes long.
We'll give you a little... Preview a taste the first 10 minutes here in this segment, but go watch it.
Go share it on X. Like I said, I mean, it already has half a million views in the first few minutes.
This should break the internet.
I want to see this have more views than any other Tucker Carlson video yet.
Here is the Tucker Carlson Alex Jones interview live now on Twitter.
We have a ruling class in the United States defined by its hatreds, not its loves, not its hopes, but by its hatreds.
They hate all kinds of people, large groups of people, the deplorables, the bitter clingers, America's entire blue collar population, the unfashionable people.
They're hated. By the people who run our country.
But no one is hated more by them than a man called Alex Jones.
Alex Jones is the single most censored man in all American history.
He was the first media figure in our history to be completely erased and one day deplatformed.
Alex Jones was deplatformed before it was a common term.
And not just deplatformed.
Sued. Attacked.
They attempted to criminally charge him.
What did Alex Jones do wrong?
Alex Jones didn't rape anybody.
He didn't loot Macy's.
He didn't burn a police station.
He didn't invent a fake cryptocurrency and loot pension funds.
He didn't start a pointless war that made this country poorer and more disorganized.
He didn't open the southern border.
No, Alex Jones had opinions that deeply rattled the people who run America.
In fact, rattled a lot of us.
And I'll just confess that I first heard of Alex Jones When he questioned the official story behind 9-11, and I, speaking for myself, was deeply offended by this.
I didn't take any time to find out what he was saying, but I was bothered by the idea that this defining event in American history, which changed the life of everyone who lived here then, might not actually have unfolded as we were told it did.
And that possibility was too destabilizing.
And I remember feeling resentment toward Alex Jones for saying that.
But several years later, I wound up in Austin, Texas, and through a chain of circumstances, wound up meeting Alex Jones.
And I learned what everyone who has met him now knows, which is Alex Jones is not a crazy person.
Alex Jones has said pretty far out things on TV from time to time.
Not that far out.
He hasn't said men can become women, or Ukraine is a democracy, but within the bounds of, say, cable news, pretty far out.
But fundamentally, Alex Jones is right about a lot of things.
And in fact, that's why they don't like him.
Alex Jones has an uncanny, really an amazing ability to predict events before they happen.
He has called it, and he's done it on tape again and again, to the point where it's a meme on the internet.
Alex Jones, profit.
Not conspiracy nut, profit.
But when you dig into Alex Jones' predictions, they are so spot on that it's remarkable.
How does he do this?
We're guessing there's a kind of spiritual sensitivity to Alex Jones.
Maybe that's his secret. He was displaying this years before the average person in this country even thought about matters like that.
Now it's pretty obvious to most people that the current war going on in this country is taking place in ways you can't see it most of the time.
But 10 years ago, people were not thinking that way.
Alex Jones was. And so we thought it'd be interesting to sit down and talk to Alex Jones, the man.
So thanks for having me. Well, I'm really grateful to be able to do it.
And it's just, it's one of the great blessings of my life and of my job is that I've been able to meet people That I've had preconceptions about and sometimes find those preconceptions bolstered and in other cases demolished.
And you're definitely in the second category.
So I want, for people who've made it this far, you know, the people who are in the country have really succeeded in making you disreputable.
And the whole point, of course, is people won't listen to you.
So we thought it'd be interesting to start with a series of on-tape predictions that you made, some of which are so precise and so prescient that it makes the hair on my arms stand up.
And I'm being sincere and our viewers are about to see what I'm talking about.
Here is a list of things that you called ahead of time.
We know the Joint Chiefs of Staff wanted to blow up airliners, Baltimore Sun, or if you let some terrorist group do it, like the World Trade Center, we know who to blame.
And if there was an outside threat like a bin Laden, who was a known CIA asset in the 80s, this group and its leader, a person named Osama bin Laden, he's the boogeyman they need.
We're looking at a giant war in February right now.
I predict the Russians are gonna roll in.
They're already there. They're gonna roll in.
unidentified
With attacks across Ukraine, which is the size of Texas.
Well, in the longer clips, it's a multi-hour show from July 25th, 2001.
I specifically walked through all the reasons, and I knew they were hyping up that we were about to be hit by Osama Bin Laden.
I knew that the World Trade Center had been attacked the first time and that the Fed's been involved helping cook the bomb and allowing it to go forward.
And I just saw a lot of the pre-programming that was happening in the media.
They were on the news saying, you know, life's about to change in America.
And I was reading what the RAND Corporation was saying and what the Pentagon was putting out.
I read the PNAC document from a year before, Rebuilding America's Defenses, that Dick Cheney had helped write.
And it said we need a Pearl Harbor event on the American homeland to be able to bring in this police state and this control and then expand the American empire worldwide.
So hundreds of pieces of data, hundreds of pieces of data went into that prediction.
In fact, in the full clip that's online, you can find it on Twitter and other places, it has been removed.
I explained to people that they need to call the White House and tell the White House, we know if you allow these attacks that you're basically allowing it to happen.
I was enjoying it. We might go back to it on the other side.
I don't know. There's some other news to get to, but go watch it for yourself.
Share it. Get those views up.
Welcome back, folks. We are going to go back to this interview.
Tucker Carlson just dropped hopefully what will become the biggest interview of his post-Fox career.
Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson, an hour-and-a-half long interview.
We're going to go back to it here for this segment.
We're going to finish up today's show with a special report on Pearl Harbor, talking about the false flag that led us into World War II, but they haven't stopped yet.
Since then, we'll play this for a few more minutes.
I encourage you to go watch it on X yourself and share it and retweet it and like it and really boost those numbers to let Elon Musk and others know that we're not okay with being silenced on the largest social media platform in existence, largest and most important, I should say. And I'll just say, it's funny from that first clip that we saw, Tucker Carlson's bafflement at how he never would have even thought that such a thing as 9-11 could have ever happened.
And I think that's sort of the key misunderstanding, is that Alex Jones simply recognizes that the people in charge are deeply, diabolically evil.
Once you understand that, it's not impossible to imagine them killing 3,000 Americans to start a war.
They're psychopaths that will kill millions in pursuit of their globalist aims.
So it's funny to see Tucker Carlson try to wrap his mind around this.
It seems like he almost still isn't quite accepting of the reality of just how vicious, psychopathic, anti-human these people are.
But maybe by the end of the interview, he comes around.
So we'll go back to a few more minutes of this, and then you can go watch it for yourself on...
X at Tucker Carlson is, of course, the account that posted it.
But here is Alex Jones and Tucker Carlson discussing how Alex Jones can possibly know what the elites are up to.
My most accurate prediction, going back over a decade, was when I read the Rockefeller Foundation, Operation Lockstep, and they described using a virus to bring in world government, to bring in a world medical ID, that they would then build the social credit score off of, and that they would make people wear masks for fear, that they would shut down sporting events and things like that, and basically phase in this new tyranny.
I was also able to specifically Make that prediction over and over and over again because I was going off their own battle plans.
I don't think a lot of people do read them, but I do read them.
I'm currently reading MIT reports from their top councils, Pentagon reports.
They have a working group called the Mad Scientist Group at the Pentagon that works with MIT. And if you go watch their hour-long, two-hour-long, three-hour-long meetings they have on YouTube, with all the top, I mean, we're talking hundreds of top scientists, they admit that they're building a post-human world, that soon everyone's going to be mind controlled, that they're going to put smart dust in our food, that they can electromagnetically control, and they just lay it all out right there.
And I've learned what these people said in the 50s they would do were done by the 70s.
What they said their plan was in the 70s for the 90s, they got done.
And then when they had their Agenda 21 in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, the big UN Summit, they described everything they would do up until the year 2000, and they got almost all of that done.
Now they've got Agenda 2030, and we're going to ban your gas stoves, we're going to ban beef, we're going to ban single-family dwellings, we're going to ban private ownership of cars, and we're going to do all this, and now you see them rolling it all out.
So I'm not really making predictions in these high-level World Economic Forum And other large think tank groups, they are laying out the future, and they're high priests at the World Economic Forum.
It's a consortium of all these groups.
Yuval Noah Harari, you can read his quotes, the future is not human.
The human era is over.
The public is useless.
I mean, this is a very anti-human system, so that's how I'm able To make predictions because they've given us a roadmap.
They tell us where they want to take us.
And so when the public wakes up, we push back on some of it, but they always come back.
And so I'm just following the trajectory of where they said they want to take us.
And there were a lot of white papers, not just the PNAC document from 2000, a year before 9-11.
Where they describe, we really need big terror attacks.
We really need Pearl Harbor events to get Americans to give up their rights.
I mean, take what just happened in Israel.
Totally tragic. My heart goes out to all that have been killed or lost levels or been injured.
But There's no way that one of the best intelligence agencies in the world didn't know that was coming, the massive buildup, the 5,000 missiles, the paragliding attacks, all of that.
And so there was clearly a stand down there.
And now the West will take more of the people's rights.
Israel will be able to crack down and take more of their people's rights, which is a big debate over there.
Hamas is being funded by Hezbollah, which is Iran.
We just had Biden a month ago give $6 billion to Iran.
And now the Mullahs are bragging that they were behind the attack, Hezbollah funding Hamas.
So really, those aren't even predictions.
It's clear that Hezbollah and Hamas have tens of thousands of men and women as sleeper cells.
Other than Mexican, the Border Patrol lists every month tens of thousands coming across the Texas and Arizona and California sectors.
And it's an easy equation to predict that there's a wide probability that Hezbollah and Hamas at some point are going to attack sports stadiums, they're going to attack colleges, they're going to attack synagogues, they're going to You know, shoot up mass gatherings if they're given the order by Iran, if we go to war with Iran.
And then when this happens, our government won't get in trouble for dissolving the border and letting these people come in.
Just like on 9-11, our government clearly had prior knowledge.
There was clearly a major stand down that went on.
And the government got more power, more control.
And now they're not pointing the homeland security apparatus But the Russians, like they did in the Cold War, or the Islamists after 9-11, now they admit that their main focus is Christian conservatives and the bitter clingers and the people that live in rural America, that white people, I mean, it says that in the report, are the main terror threat.
And so this whole apparatus of the war on terror...
It has now been turned inwardly against the people, not just here, but also in Europe, where if someone criticizes transgenderism in the UK, they come to their house and arrest them.
If a journalist does that, they come to their house and arrest them.
If somebody says, I think these surveillance cameras should start getting cut down, they come to their house and they arrest them for their free speech.
And so this is a global movement by the megacorporations, by the Black Rocks and the state streets and the vanguards that control 80 plus percent of world wealth.
We're going to use our control over all this finance and this global social credit score we're rolling out to control people's behavior.
So that's really what this is.
And then they use the threat of global warming.
They use the threat of a virus.
They use the threat of radical Islam to take our rights.
Because I do read their documents and I do read their books.
And we were effectively getting a lot of people in the military and the intelligence agencies who were compartmentalized and who tuned into my show and saw my films and read my books and things.
And they clicked with it.
And said, wow, I see all this going on around me.
He's not lying about it. And then I would give them other pieces that I discovered or my other guests discovered.
And so it was giving them an operational awareness outside of their compartmentalization.
You love seeing this type of truth be told on a platform like X with the reach of somebody like Tucker.
Incredible stuff. The whole interview was an hour and a half long.
Go find it on Tucker Carlson's Twitter feed.
Watch it. Share it.
Get those views up. Learn something.
By the way, the thing Alex just said about turning inward in the war on terror, it's actually from the Lockstep document as well, where they say the U.S. reallocated a large share of its defense spending to domestic concerns pulling out of Afghanistan, where the resurgent Taliban seized power once again.
In Europe, Asia, South America, and Africa, more and more nation states lost control of their public finances, as well as the capacity to help their citizens and retain stability.
There's a lot of low-level conflicts, proxy wars.
It's all happening according to plan.
Alex Jones, they hate him because he revealed the plan.
And you can support us in this mission at Infowarsstore.com.
We'll be back on the other side with a special report by Brian Wilson.
Don't go anywhere, folks. All right, folks.
Welcome back.
Welcome back. Owen Schroer getting out of prison.
Alex Jones going mainstream with the Tucker Carlson interview.
Probably... Well, possibly, if not probably, getting back onto Twitter.
Just massive success across the board.
You can be a part of the great awakening by going to Infowarsstore.com, keeping us on the air,
keeping us in the fight, and keeping yourself healthy with our incredible supplements,
or informed with our incredible books, movies, or incredibly stylish with our T-shirts,
and so much more at Infowarsstore.com.
Right now, the super mega sale, Infowars Christmas sale, you're getting up to 60% off plus free shipping
and double Patriot points on just about all, well, all the products up to 60% off,
including Turbo Force Plus and Survivor Shield X2, a couple of products that sell out rapidly at full price,
and yet are on massive discount today at Infowarsstore.com.
Keep us in the fight. Keep us on the air.
Keep yourself informed and healthy at Infowarsstore.com and be a part of this movement, which is only gaining speed and steam despite the attacks against us from every different level.
This is what happens.
We need trust in God and tell the truth, regardless of how they try to binge your will.
Infowarsstore.com, again, keeps us on the air.
And importantly, not just Infowars, not just the Alex Jones Show, not just the War Room or the American Journal, not just the website Infowars.com, but Band.Video and all of the great content creators there, including Red Pilled TV, a.k.a.
Brian Wilson. Incredible report on Pearl Harbor, the false flag.
That really started it all and more people need to know about.
So here is Brian Wilson.
Find this and share it at band.video.
FDR's Pearl Harbor. Stand down, exposed.
unidentified
Let's watch. On December 7, 1941, the Imperial Japanese Navy Air Service struck Pearl Harbor on the island of Oahu, in the then U.S. territory of Hawaii, where over 3,000 Americans were killed and wounded, and the United States was obliged to enter the theater of World War II. Declaring war against Japan, Germany, and Italy in the same week.
But was this attack on the US an accident?
A failure of American intelligence?
A brilliant military coup?
At first, a panel created by FDR concluded that we had no advanced warning and should blame only local commanders for the lack of preparedness.
However, According to author Robert S. Stinnett, in his book, Day of Deceit, The Truth About FDR in Pearl Harbor, the attack was the result of a carefully orchestrated design initiated at the highest levels of the U.S. government to motivate Americans to support another massive foreign war.
He uses over 200,000 documents and interviews obtained through the Freedom of Information Act to lay out how under Franklin Delano Roosevelt's leadership, the heads of the United States military would first provoke, then stand down and allow an attack to take place, absorbing the first strike from Japan, an overt act of war.
This justified the United States' entrance into World War II against the Axis powers to serve British interests in Europe and around the world.
On October 7, 1940, Lieutenant Commander Arthur H. McCollum sent a memo to two of Roosevelt's most trusted military advisors, Which laid out eight steps that he predicted would precipitate a Japanese attack on the United States.
These eight steps included using British and Dutch bases in the Pacific, aiding the Chinese government's fight with Japan, sending a division of long-range heavy cruisers and submarines into, or adjacent to, territorial waters of Japan, keeping the main strength of the US fleet in the Hawaiian Islands, And completely embargoing all trade with Japan, just as the British Empire had already done.
The day after this memo was sent to FDR's advisers, the State Department told Americans to evacuate Far East countries as quickly as possible in preparation for conflict.
And Roosevelt ordered the US fleet to stay in Hawaiian waters, which had already been there for an annual training exercise.
Admiral James O. Richardson objected to keeping the fleet in Hawaii, citing a lack of training facilities, ammunition, fuel, and support craft.
Quote, there was no logical reason for me to make such a request.
But he reluctantly obeyed the orders from Roosevelt and his military chiefs.
FDR personally took charge of sending heavy cruisers near Japan's territorial waters, saying, quote, I just want them to keep popping up here and there and keep the Japs guessing.
I don't mind losing one or two cruisers, but do not take a chance on losing five or six.
The Pacific Fleet Commander objected to this strategy, retorting, quote, It is ill-advised and will result in war if we make this move.
However, This is exactly what FDR wanted to do.
Admiral Richardson quotes Roosevelt as saying, quote, During his campaign for the new term of his presidency, FDR promised voters, quote, But according to his biographer, He told members of his staff, quote, of course we'll fight if we're attacked.
If someone attacks us, then it isn't a foreign war, is it?
Soon, Lieutenant Commander McCollum's eight-point action memo would make the president's words into a reality.
Additionally, despite an embargo on trade with Japan, the White House allowed Japan to obtain petroleum supplies sufficient to maintain its ability to make war.
Between 1940 and 1941, a period when American oil supplies were supposedly under embargo, over 9 million barrels of gasoline were licensed for export to Japan, with 2 million more pending, while the Japanese tankers transporting the oil were under electronic surveillance by the Navy, including their radio codes.
Conventional history states that these codes were not solved until the spring of 1942, but new information reveals that a team of Army and Navy cryptographers solved the two principal Japanese government radio code systems in the early fall of 1940, around the same time that McCollum's memo reached the Oval Office.
They had solved all four of the principal radio codes for Japanese warships by the fall of 1941.
The same four radio codes that Admiral Yamamoto, commander-in-chief of the Imperial Japanese Navy, used to transmit his war orders up until the attack.
Between November 20th and December 6th, Yamamoto and his commanders clearly revealed two forces were aimed at Hawaii, so the U.S. undoubtedly deciphered Japanese communications that indicated their plan to attack Pearl Harbor.
However, the timing of this successful decoding was hidden in naval intelligence records, even long after the war.
Some of these encrypted messages included communications from a Japanese spy, which the FBI deemed the outside man.
Named Tadashi Morimura, who was posing as the chancellor in the Japanese consulate in Hawaii.
The FBI and White House knew Morimura and his Japanese spy team were operating in Hawaii from March of 1941 until the attack, even intercepting and decoding his bomb plot grid details on August 21st, which gave the lay of the land for Pearl Harbor and advised for the attack.
After providing a clear map of the target and intel on U.S. naval activities for almost the entire year of 1941, the day before the attack, Morimura sent a message to Tokyo stating, quote, Even though they have actually made preparations, there are limits to the balloon defense of Pearl Harbor.
I imagine that in all probability there is considerable opportunity left to take advantage for a surprise attack against these places.
This message was decoded moments after being sent, but the warning was withheld.
Almost everything about the official Pearl Harbor narrative is a lie, including the fact that the Japanese fleet did not maintain radio silence as it approached Hawaii.
A fabrication used to convince the world that we didn't see it coming, even that day.
The truth is, the US military had been monitoring the movements and communications of Japanese ships for almost a year as they returned to their homelands from abroad, clearly planning something big in the Pacific.
Japan's initial planning for the attack began in the fall of 1940.
Naval Minister Admiral Koshiro Oikawa and Admiral Yamamoto agreed that a surprise air raid on Pearl Harbor should start Japan's military offense against America.
At the U.S. Embassy in Tokyo, the attack plan was leaked from Japanese naval officers to U.S. Secretary Max Bishop.
Through a Peruvian minister to Japan.
On January 27, 1941, Bishop sent the U.S. Secretary of State a message reading, quote, My Peruvian colleague told a member of my staff that he had heard from many sources, including a Japanese source, that the Japanese military forces planned in the event of trouble with the United States to attempt a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor.
Using all of their military facilities.
When Lieutenant Commander Arthur McCollum heard about this message, he advised FDR to dismiss the warning, which he did.
In the end, on December 7th, the attack on Pearl Harbor took place.
Millions of Americans who wanted nothing to do with foreign wars, in shock, ran to their recruiting offices to join the various armed services.
In that week, FDR got exactly what he wanted from provoking Japan.
America at war.
To protect British interests around the world.
As Roosevelt said in his speech the following day, it truly was a day of infamy, but it was also a day of deceit.