Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Harrison Smith presents War Room on InfoWars. | |
| Welcome, ladies and gentlemen, to the War Room. | ||
| InfoWars.com banned. Video. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith, sitting in once again for the great Owen Schroer. | ||
| DefendOwen.com. | ||
| We have a big show for you today. | ||
| We'll be joined in the third hour by Ashton Forbes. | ||
| Talk a little bit about what he is doing these days. | ||
| He's uncovering the truth about MH370, the Malaysian airline flight that disappeared mysteriously. | ||
| And he has come out with some incredibly bombshell videos. | ||
| That purports to show advanced technology used to Disappear the plane. | ||
| Really incredible stuff. So we'll be talking with him in the third hour. | ||
| Lots of videos and stories to talk about before then. | ||
| Bit of a follow-up to our extended coverage yesterday about open AI and the globalist takeover of artificial intelligence. | ||
| We'll also be talking about a lot of stuff going on in DC right now. | ||
| Some hearings, some revelations being made about censorship and surveillance carried out by our government in complete, abject violation of our First Amendment, you know, the primary one, the most important restriction the government has on its action, they're doing it anyway. | ||
| And we'll talk about the way Republicans are fighting back, if you can call it that. | ||
| We're being generous when we say that, but they are at least asking questions and getting some interesting answers and having some interesting back and forth with the Democrats, so we'll show you some of those. | ||
| But I want to start today with the best news I've heard in the last 24 hours. | ||
| Yes folks, we're starting with a highlight today. | ||
| This just breaking, brand new, of particular interest to the InfoWars audience. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus is back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Yes, Turbo Force Plus is back in stock, and it's 25% off for the Cyber Week sale. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus, we had a caller, what, yesterday? | ||
| The day before? Saying, yeah, I love your products, but when are you going to get Turbo Force back? | ||
| Well, ask and ye shall receive. | ||
| It is back in stock. It is 25% off. | ||
| Of course, you're still getting free shipping and double Patriot points because of the Cyber Week sale at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| So go there today. Stock up if you can because once it sells out, it's out. | ||
| It's Turbo Force Plus. Incredibly powerful energy drink mix. | ||
| You can have all of the power of an energy drink for a fraction of the cost and almost none of the sugar. | ||
| Maybe none of the sugar. I don't even think there's sugar in there. | ||
| What there is is a ton of incredible vitamins, minerals, and natural extracts that give you long-lasting and powerful energy. | ||
| Now to the second best piece of information I've received. | ||
| Henry Kissinger is dead. | ||
| Let's watch. EU-US tension worries Kissinger and are we going to lose our liberties in this country because everybody from Governor Frank Keating to Henry Kissinger are calling for Americans to start living another lifestyle. | ||
| To give up liberty for security is the Henry Kissinger and Governor Keating quote and I'm hearing it all over the radio television. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Kissinger was asked how to get the UN troops on American soil back in 91 in Evian, France in front of the Bilderberg group. | |
| Because if we had an outside threat, the American people would beg for their world government to save them. | ||
| The alien threat scenario has been discussed by Kissinger and others. | ||
| Publicly, they've admitted they're going to use a fake alien attack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There also exists an extraordinary opportunity to form for the first time in history a truly global society of a new world order. | |
| That's what this is about. | ||
| Visit Infowarsstore.com today. | ||
| Take on the new world order by keeping info wars on the air. | ||
| So I left Waited in my library | ||
| Cause I waited A little compilation in the memory of Dr. History. | ||
| Henry Kissinger. Sort of an odd situation. | ||
| Kissinger is sort of a proto-globalist. | ||
| Sort of a ringleader of our enemies. | ||
| So it's always weird when one of these guys dies. | ||
| And you've got places like the Rolling Stone and Daily Beast and the most far left rags out there celebrating this, calling him a warmonger and a mass murderer. | ||
| It's like, but he's doing everything you love. | ||
| But no, he's responsible for setting the world that you fight for and are dedicated to. | ||
| What are you complaining about? | ||
| This is globalism. | ||
| You get what you asked for. | ||
| EU-US tension worries Kissinger, and are we going to lose our liberties in this country because everybody from Governor Frank Keating to Henry Kissinger are calling for Americans to start living another lifestyle. | ||
| To give up liberty for security is the Henry Kissinger and Governor Keating quote, and I'm hearing it all over the radio, television. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Kissinger was asked how to get the UN troops on American soil back in 91 in Evian, France, in front of the Bilderberg Group. | |
| He said that we had an outside threat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The American people would beg for their world government to save them. | |
| The alien threat scenario has been discussed by Kissinger and others. | ||
| Publicly, they've admitted they're going to use a fake alien attack. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There also exists an extraordinary opportunity to form for the first time in history a truly global society of a new world order. | |
| That's what this is about. | ||
| Visit Infowarsstore.com today. | ||
| Take on the new world order by keeping Infowars on the air. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Yes, Henry Kissinger has passed on. | ||
| He's in hell now. | ||
| And that's all I have to say about that. | ||
| Although, the video you just saw, you may have noticed Alex wasn't moving very much. | ||
| That's because that was from our audio-only archive before Infowars had video all the way back in 2001. | ||
| Simply searching through the transcripts for the word Kissinger and finding what Alex was saying about this man 22 years ago. | ||
| 22 years ago he had their number and it's the same game plan, only advanced several decades. | ||
| Really incredible stuff. | ||
| We can get into Kissinger more if we want, but there's so much more other news to discuss. | ||
| After all, he's passed on the torch. | ||
| He has shed his mantle, and it has been picked up by other psychopathic globalists with a stranglehold on international policy. | ||
| We've got new Kissingers menacing our very existence that we'll get into. | ||
| And I want to start today... | ||
| With stuff going on in Washington, D.C., in particular about surveillance and censorship, the two go hand in hand. | ||
| If you subscribe to my Substack, you know that when I compile all the stories every day, harrisonhillsmith.substack.com, by the way, if you want to get all of our sources every day, even the ones I don't get to, as well as our videos. | ||
| But I always try to categorize stories in certain categories, and there's always a sort of Gray area where stories bleed into each other, and there is no noticeable difference between the targets of censorship, surveillance, and political persecution. | ||
| These would be typically separate, but they go hand in hand. | ||
| Because the people being censored and surveilled and silenced online with cooperation of big tech companies are the very same people who are being targeted by the FBI and others for surveillance and persecution at the federal level. | ||
| And there are hearings about this going on right now at the Weaponization Committee. | ||
| Michael Schellenberger, who is a fantastic source of information, and we use his articles quite often on this show, He has revealed the U.S. and U.K. military's leading role in censoring American speech and targeting Trump supporters. | ||
| He gave a very powerful five-minute long introductory statement that I want to play in full for you here. | ||
| It's clip number 12. So here is Michael Schellenberger with his opening statement to the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Federal Government. | ||
| Pay attention, folks. Here it is. | ||
| Nine months ago, I testified and provided evidence to the subcommittee about the existence of a censorship industrial complex, a network of government agencies including the Department of Homeland Security, government contractors, and big tech media platforms that conspired to censor ordinary Americans and elected officials alike for holding disfavored views. | ||
| I regret to inform the subcommittee today that the scope, power, and law-breaking of the censorship industrial complex are even worse than we had realized back in March. | ||
| Two days ago, my colleagues and I published the first batch of internal files from the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, which show US and UK military contractors working in 2019 and 2020 to both censor and turn sophisticated psychological operations and disinformation tactics developed abroad against the American people. | ||
| Many insist that all that we identified in the Twitter files, the Facebook files, and the CTI files were legal activities by social media platforms to take down content that violated the terms of service. | ||
| Facebook, X, formerly Twitter, and other big tech companies are privately owned, people point out, and free to censor content. | ||
| And government officials are free to point out wrong information, they argue. | ||
| But the First Amendment prohibits the government from abridging freedom of speech. | ||
| The Supreme Court has ruled that the government may not induce, encourage, or promote private persons to accomplish what is constitutionally forbidden to accomplish. | ||
| And there's now a large body of evidence proving that the government did precisely that. | ||
| What's more, the whistleblower who delivered the CTIL files to us says that its leader, a quote-unquote former British intelligence analyst, was quote-unquote in the room at the Obama White House in 2017 when she received the instructions to create a counter disinformation project to quote stop a repeat of 2016. | ||
| The U.S. Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity and information security agency, CISA, has been the center of gravity for much of the censorship, with the National Science Foundation financing the development of censorship and disinformation tools and other federal government agencies playing a supportive role. | ||
| Emails from CISA's NGO and social media partners show that CISA created the Election Integrity Partnership, EIP, in 2020, Which involved the Stanford Internet Observatory and other U.S. government contractors. | ||
| EIP and its successor, the Virality Project, urged Twitter, Facebook, and other platforms to censor social media posts by ordinary citizens and elected officials alike. | ||
| EIP reported that they had a 75% response rate from the platforms and that 35% of the URLs that they reported were either removed, labeled, or throttled, or soft-blocked. | ||
| In 2020, the Department of Homeland Security, CISA, violated the First Amendment and interfered in the election. | ||
| While in 2021, CISA and the White House violated the First Amendment and undermined America's response to the COVID pandemic by demanding that Facebook and Twitter censor content that Facebook said that Facebook itself said was quote-unquote often true, including about vaccine side effects. | ||
| All of this is profoundly un-American. | ||
| One's commitment to free speech means nothing if it does not extend to your political enemies. | ||
| In his essential new book, Liar in a Crowded Theater, Jeff Koseff, a law professor at the United States Naval Academy, shows that the widespread view that the government can censor false speech and or speech that quote-unquote causes harm is mostly wrong. | ||
| The Supreme Court has allowed very few constraints on speech. | ||
| For example, the test of incitement to violence remains its immediacy. | ||
| I encourage Congress to defund and dismantle the government organizations involved in censorship. | ||
| That includes phasing out all funding for the National Science Foundation's Track F, Trust in Authenticity and Communication Systems, and its secure and trustworthy cyberspace track. | ||
| I would also encourage Congress to abolish CISA in DHS. Short of taking those steps, I would encourage significant guardrails and oversight to prevent such censorship from happening again. | ||
| In particular, It's very easy to see the line in CISA. They say they're covering physical security, cyber security, but they added a third one, cognitive security, which is basically attempting to control the information environment and how people think about the world, including the stories that they tell. | ||
| Finally, I would encourage Congress to consider making Section 230 liability protections contingent upon social media platforms known in the law as interactive computer services to allow adult users to moderate our own legal content through filters that we choose and whose algorithms are transparent to all of us. | ||
| I would encourage Congress to prohibit government officials from asking the platforms to remove content Which the Supreme Court may or may not rule on constitutional next year when it decides on the Missouri v Biden case. | ||
| Should the court somehow decide that the government requests for censorship are constitutional, then I would urge Congress to require such requests to be reported publicly instantaneously so that such censorship demands occur in plain sight. | ||
| Thank you very much for hearing my testimony. | ||
| So there's the opening testimony of Michael Schellenberger. | ||
| And of course, we covered briefly the bombshell report. | ||
| You can find it on Infowars.com. | ||
| Whistleblower documents show U.S. and U.K. military contractors created a sweeping plan for global censorship in 2018. | ||
| And there is an important thing to realize about this. | ||
| It's obvious, but you have to emphasize it. | ||
| U.S. and U.K. and Canada and France and Ireland and Germany, this is a global attempt of censorship. | ||
| Yes, it violates American law egregiously and obviously in a way that should be reformed, but everybody in the world is now under control of these media masters. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Weaponization of Government is meeting today, and I guess that video is from today. | ||
| I didn't know if that video is from today or yesterday, but of course it broke today, the video we just showed you of Michael Schellenberger's opening statement, where he really laid out how severe this problem is. | ||
| And what I want to try to illustrate is not only what has been revealed by the House Judiciary Committee, in particular their chairman Jim Jordan, and how this is just obvious violation of our Constitution in multiple ways, in the literal exact definition of the restrictions of our Bill of Rights, but also in the spirit and violating the principle of what those amendments represent. | ||
| I also want to talk about how this is a global phenomenon. | ||
| Well, phenomenon is not the right word. | ||
| I'm sorry. It's a global conspiracy. | ||
| It's a global conspiracy that entails corporations, individuals, organizations that are non-governmental as well as governmental, all working hand-in-hand, hand-in-glove in a coordinated fashion to silence the right wing. | ||
| It's a little more complicated than that, but that's a good label for it, the right wing, because it's anybody that opposes their so-called progressivism, which is in fact a thinly veiled disguise placed over their anti-human depopulation agenda. | ||
| And so weird how all this blends together. | ||
| How you have surveillance and censorship and digital currency and climate change and hate speech and they're all just different aspects of the same process taking place. | ||
| Globalization. One world government being created. | ||
| Silencing dissent. | ||
| Destroying what makes us human in order to replace humanity. | ||
| With a much more easily controlled sort of fleshy robot type of individual. | ||
| And I also want to show you some more videos where Democrats show how just utterly, utterly stupid, misinformed, and deceitful these people are. | ||
| As if you needed more evidence. | ||
| But I want to start with the fact that as we Attempt to combat all of these things. | ||
| The fact that there are so many different variations of this same process. | ||
| And how there's a certain amount of legalese that goes on that undercuts the intention of our laws. | ||
| What I mean by that is that if you take the amendments at their face value in a dictionary definition sort of way, then they can kind of get away with some of this stuff. | ||
| But the point of the Bill of Rights and the point of the first ten amendments to the Constitution were not to be some sort of, you know, like, aspect of a game that you're supposed to try to get around. | ||
| Oh, well, they say that it's freedom of the press, but we didn't print it on a press, so we get to do it. | ||
| No. They were about embodying a very important, several very important principles that have completely gone out of sight. | ||
| And I've talked about this in terms of the press, right? | ||
| Where when this was written, the freedom of the press, when they were referring to the press, they weren't referring to it like we refer to it. | ||
| When I say the press, you think of newspapers and corporations that are media companies. | ||
| When they said the press, they meant the physical press. | ||
| They meant the big machine that you put letters in and put ink on and slam onto paper. | ||
| That's what they meant. So what they were saying when they said freedom of press was freedom of the technology to spread information to a mass amount of people. | ||
| And this isn't complicated. | ||
| This isn't hard to understand. In the same way, the Fourth Amendment prevents unreasonable search and seizures of papers, right? | ||
| Well, if it's not paper, does that mean they get to search it? | ||
| If it's being held by somebody else, does that mean that the Fourth Amendment doesn't apply? | ||
| Because that's how they're treating it, right? | ||
| They'll go in and search your DMs without a warrant. | ||
| They'll request from the company that the company provide them information about you that they hold, but that's your private personal information. | ||
| And they say, yeah, it doesn't violate the Fourth Amendment because, well, it's not really theirs. | ||
| It's being held by somebody else. | ||
| As if, like, you could send a letter and when the mailman picks up the letter, it's suddenly his and he gets to open it because he's the one holding it. | ||
| No, it's still your letter. | ||
| It's still your private information that they don't have a right to look into. | ||
| And I don't... You know, it's one of these problems where it's like, if you aren't taught about the importance of these principles... | ||
| Starting in elementary school, I don't know if I can convince you of them now that you're an adult who's bent on violating them. | ||
| So the principle behind these things, the principle behind the First Amendment, again, it's not some sort of game mechanic where it's like, oh, it's a fun little barrier that you get to try to get around in whichever way you can. | ||
| No, it's a principle that you're supposed to apply whether or not it fits the exact definition word of the law. | ||
| It's the spirit of the law, not the word of it that's supposed to matter. | ||
| So unreasonable search and seizure of your papers should obviously, I mean the principle behind that is that the government doesn't have a right to just look into everything that you own and everything that you write and everything that you say without good reason to do so. | ||
| Without a reason that is predicated on your breaking the law and they have a responsibility as the government to protect other people from you breaking the law. | ||
| And again, that's why we have a warrant system. | ||
| That's why we have judges to do this. | ||
| They're circumventing all of that, and they're violating the Bill of Rights at a technical and legal level, but they're also, more importantly, I think, violating it in a spiritual and principle level. | ||
| And tons of stories about this are coming out. | ||
| Infowars has all of them. | ||
| The White House goes rogue. | ||
| Secret surveillance program breaks all the laws. | ||
| Surveillance, digital stalking, and data mining of American people, weapons of compliance | ||
| and control in the government's hands, haven't made Americans any safer, and they certainly | ||
| aren't helping to preserve our freedoms. | ||
| The government wants us to believe that we have nothing to fear from its mass spying | ||
| programs as long as we've done nothing wrong. | ||
| Don't believe it. | ||
| It doesn't matter whether you obey every law. | ||
| The government's definition of a bad guy is extraordinarily broad, and it results in the | ||
| warrantless surveillance of innocent law-abiding Americans on a staggering scale. | ||
| For instance, it was recently revealed that the White House, relying on a set of privacy | ||
| loopholes, has been sidestepping the Fourth Amendment by paying AT&T to allow federal, | ||
| state, and local law enforcement to access, without a warrant, the phone records of Americans | ||
| who are not suspected of a crime. | ||
| This goes way beyond NSA's metadata collection program. | ||
| There's a couple aspects of this that are important. | ||
| First of all, the mass amounts of data that they were collecting is only now in a form that is usable and actionable to them because of AI. We talked a lot about AI yesterday. | ||
| I'm not going to get into it. But if you're capturing every text message and every phone call for a decade, like how useful is that really? | ||
| How useful is that really? | ||
| To search that, I mean, are you going to come up with anything useful? | ||
| Probably not. Feed it all into an AI and tell them what to look for. | ||
| Well, now suddenly you have a very efficient machine to determine dissent and to figure out how to work against it. | ||
| And to figure out putting in little... | ||
| Attributes of action, the change, the discussion people are having. | ||
| I mean, they have full control of the information landscape even on an interpersonal level at this point due to the NSA collection and now the advanced AI that can actually make use of it. | ||
| In addition to that, as we've pointed out since the discussion of free speech really kicked off with social media censorship, private companies do not have a right to sell your information to the government or censor you or do anything that the government's not allowed to do either. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The American government has for a very long time been engaged in the demolition of the American Constitution. | ||
| If the Bill of Rights and the first ten amendments are the pillars that uphold our freedoms, As sovereign individuals, citizens of a great and freedom-loving country, one by one they're taking a jackhammer to the base of these pillars. | ||
| The whole structure is wavering at this point. | ||
| Thankfully there are some in office that are doing what they can to expose this and combat it. | ||
| But you have to understand that this isn't something that happened after 2016. | ||
| We can talk about things like this You know, the contracts, the global plan of censorship in 2018. | ||
| I mean, if you don't know where this started, I don't know what to tell you. | ||
| I mean, you can take it back to at least the Patriot Act, right? | ||
| But probably a lot earlier than that. | ||
| But these things have built up year over year over year. | ||
| Just inching their way towards total control, eliminating little aspects of your rights until suddenly the rights themselves have been completely dissolved. | ||
| And even the power of the Congress has been slowly but surely winnowed away to where so much power now has been accrued in the executive branch. | ||
| And the executive branch itself is so infested with bureaucratic globalist operatives That it almost doesn't matter what Congress does because they've allowed their power to be usurped. | ||
| They have allowed the checks and balances system that kept our government operational to be completely unbalanced. | ||
| And you think like, well, but that's okay because you can just get your president in power and then they're in control of this massive system. | ||
| Centralized power structure under the executive branch, but we saw how that worked out with Trump. | ||
| His own underlings, the people who'd been in this system for years, didn't listen to the elected representative that they're supposed to. | ||
| Another violation of the Constitution in its most fundamental and foundational form. | ||
| But regardless of the uselessness, That we see on display by the Congress. | ||
| They are doing it. Thread by Jim Jordan on Twitter. | ||
| The YouTube files, part one, Biden White House pressured YouTube to censor Americans. | ||
| Internal docs from Google, which is YouTube's parent company, obtained by Judiciary GOP and the Weaponization Committee, show that the Biden White House wanted Americans censored. | ||
| Not just that, they got it. | ||
| And he sort of goes through a rundown history of what's been revealed recently. | ||
| Says after issuing subpoenas to big tech, The judiciary of the GOP released the Facebook files this summer revealing that the Biden White House had wanted true information censored. | ||
| Facebook changed its policy because of the pressure of the Biden administration. | ||
| The Biden White House was pushing Facebook and Twitter to censor more. | ||
| We now know the White House was repeatedly pressuring Google to censor content on YouTube. | ||
| Rob Flattery, Biden's director of digital strategy, emailed Google wanting to know how | ||
| Google would better, quote, crack down on vaccine misinformation and to discuss, quote, | ||
| ways the White House and our COVID experts can partner in your product work. | ||
| Privately, Google understood what this request meant as internal documents obtained by Judiciary | ||
| GOP reveal, quote, Rob's questions were very YT focused, YouTube focused, end quote. | ||
| He dug in on our decision for making borderline content, which YouTube says is content that | ||
| doesn't, quote, violate our community guidelines. | ||
| A week later, one of the Google government affairs team members who had recently been | ||
| on a call with the Biden White House, specifically Rob Flattery, explained plainly what Flattery | ||
| Quote, he's really interested in what we're seeing that is not coming down. | ||
| YouTube's Government Affairs team then emailed the YouTube product team warning that the Biden White House, quote, is very interested in our work on borderline content and the product team should brief the White House to prevent anything from potentially spiraling out of control. | ||
| So they were using COVID as an excuse to censor true information. | ||
| Likely resulted in God knows how many deaths from people that were prevented from getting medicine that was effective, like ivermectin, as they were allowed to spread actual misinformation about it being a horse medicine that wasn't safe for humans. | ||
| They'll use words like mis- and disinformation. | ||
| They don't mean it. I mean, I don't know if I have to remind you of this. | ||
| They don't mean it. The same process takes place over and over again, and it's so frustrating because we've known this forever, which is why we're right all the time, which is why we're able to see through it before they even enact these policies. | ||
| They create a crisis. | ||
| They create a crisis. | ||
| Then they use that crisis as an excuse to censor and surveil and destroy your rights. | ||
| They do it time and time again. | ||
| They do it on a daily basis at this point. | ||
| They're doing it right in front of you. | ||
| And hoping you don't notice. And by the time the crisis has passed and these policies have been put into place, they don't go anywhere. | ||
| They don't stop doing this. | ||
| They don't stop using the tools they forged to silence you. | ||
| They just transmute it to whatever the new topic is. | ||
| So they'll use the same program that they instituted for COVID and vaccine misinformation to silence the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| It has nothing to do with it, but once they get their foot in the door, Well, they're in. | ||
| And that's that. Fox Business has a story about this as well. | ||
| White House worked with YouTube to censor COVID-19 and vaccine, quote, misinformation, House Judiciary Committee reports. | ||
| The Biden administration worked together with employees of Google-owned YouTube in 2021 to target alleged misinformation relating to COVID-19 virus and its vaccinations, according to documents obtained by Fox Business. | ||
| Which would be wrong even if they were actually doing that. | ||
| Even if they were actually censoring misinformation, it would still be a violation of our rights, still be an overreach of the government, still be a dangerous transgression by those in power on the rights of the citizens. | ||
| But they were wrong about everything. | ||
| So it's additionally nonsensical that this is allowed to continue. | ||
| Without actual punishments. | ||
| Is there a punishment for violating the Constitution? | ||
| I mean, how much proof do we need that you have people in the highest levels of government, whether it's in the FBI or the CIA or the State Department or the White House, that are actively engaged in secret conspiracies to implement censorship on the most important, powerful, and popular informational outlets in the world? | ||
| And they're just allowed to do that? | ||
| And they're just getting away with it? | ||
| I mean, what? | ||
| How? How are they getting away with this? | ||
| How are these people not being charged with something and punished to an appropriate degree? | ||
| Oh, because they're all in on it? | ||
| Oh, right, I forgot. But then this gets even more... | ||
| I don't know what it gets. Intriguing, interesting, horrifying, dangerous, disturbing, scary. | ||
| When you realize the way this is being rolled out on a global fashion and again the way they just use the same tactic over and over and it always works. | ||
| It always works. And it's not just about censorship and surveillance either. | ||
| Look at the mail-in ballots that they had to implement as an emergency measure for COVID-19. | ||
| Well, that's over now. | ||
| They didn't get rid of the mail-in ballots, did they? | ||
| They use emergencies as an excuse to implement something once the emergency is over, | ||
| which it usually is right after they implement it, right? | ||
| As soon as they get what they want, suddenly the crisis goes away | ||
| because that was the point of the crisis, that's what it was for actually. | ||
| And again, they create the crisis. | ||
| They created COVID in a lab, which gave them the excuse to censor YouTube | ||
| and surveil people and et cetera, et cetera, and mail-in ballots and everything else that they did. | ||
| They created it in a lab. | ||
| They allowed it to spread uncontained. | ||
| And then they used it as an excuse. | ||
| In the same way they use war or they'll use migrants. | ||
| They bring the migrants in. | ||
| They don't investigate them at all. | ||
| So they commit, the migrants commit crime. | ||
| And if you stand up to them, they implement hate speech and disinformation laws | ||
| to stop you from doing that. | ||
| Time and time again, they create a crisis. | ||
| They implement a policy that restricts your rights, but doesn't actually fight the crisis at all. | ||
| And the crisis is usually over shortly after. | ||
| So we'll talk about how this is manifesting on an international level, because there is no country in the Western world that is not experiencing this exact process, this exact game plan, this exact Policy of crisis reaction, crisis reaction, crisis reaction. | ||
| The reaction every single time is a diminution of your rights. | ||
| Every single time, it is the average, law-abiding, innocent, formerly liberty-loving person that has their rights destroyed and their life made that much worse. | ||
| We'll be right back, show you how this is happening on a global way. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. | ||
| Stories at Infowars.com. | ||
| The White House goes rogue. | ||
| Secret surveillance program breaks all the laws. | ||
| This in particular has to do with circumventing, sidestepping the Fourth Amendment by going directly to corporations and demanding their information about you or your information that they hold. | ||
| And they do this with social media where they get access to your DMs and private messages without you ever knowing, without a warrant ever having been signed, without probable cause having ever been established. | ||
| They simply call their contact in the big media company and they send it right over. | ||
| It's as simple as that. | ||
| It's like having a safe cracker on hand in your house to open your safe and deliver your information online. | ||
| To the government without even asking so much as a reason for why they want it. | ||
| And of course it's not just big tech and, I mean, you're talking about YouTube and you're talking about Google. | ||
| You're probably talking about Gmail as well, right? | ||
| You're probably talking about the biggest, most important, the most prominent and ubiquitous communication tool in the history of the world that they have inside access to, if I had to guess. | ||
| And it's not just AT&T, the phone company, allowing federal, state, and local law enforcement to access information without a warrant, which they are doing. | ||
| But you've got Bank of America providing, without even being asked, providing the American government transactional records of every customer they had in an entire city on the basis of national security on January 6th. | ||
| So this is the World Economic Forum, neo-feudal, corporate, conglomerate, The Great Reset, much better understood as the Great Collaboration, the Great Consolidation, where these formerly separate and sometimes at odds power structures are instead being folded into each other like shuffling a deck of cards. | ||
| They're all just becoming one thing that work hand in glove with one another. | ||
| And they point out in this article from InfoWars, exactly what I was just pointing out, the intention and the principle behind the amendments that is the superlative important thing of their existence. | ||
| They say the Fourth Amendment was intended to serve as a protective force field around our persons, our property, our activities, our communications, and our movements. | ||
| It keeps the government out of private business except in certain extenuating circumstances. | ||
| Those extenuating circumstances are spelled out clearly. | ||
| Government officials must have probable cause that criminal activity is afoot. | ||
| And that's a higher legal standard than just reasonable suspicion. | ||
| But they're able to circumvent that because the corporations that have the information are happy to provide them without requiring this. | ||
| I mean, this is really the responsibility of the corporations. | ||
| They need to, you know, be held to account for this. | ||
| They need to actually respect their position as guarantors of our rights. | ||
| But of course they're not. But I like the way that... | ||
| That the author of this info words article phrases this Warrantless dragnet surveillance is the manifestation of a | ||
| lawless government that has gone rogue in its determination to do whatever it wants whenever it wants | ||
| the Constitution be damned Dragnet surveillance geo-fencing fusion center smart | ||
| devices behavioral threat assessments terror watch list facial recognition snitch tip lines | ||
| biometric scanners pre-crime DNA database data mining pre-cognitive technology | ||
| contact tracing apps They say there, you know these add up | ||
| To mean more than 20 ways that you're spied and tracked Continuously by a variety of governments | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you very much. | |
| And all these things are, like I said, just different aspects of the same policy moving forward. | ||
| The same intention, which is to degree by degree crush humanity's ability to speak out against the people that run the world. | ||
| And, of course, they point out the And there's an obvious reason, right? It's because fear overrides your logic center. | ||
| And if you are faced with what you believe to be an overwhelming and existential threat... | ||
| Well, who cares about the Constitution at that point? | ||
| We might die, so do whatever you want, right? | ||
| So the more intense and dramatic and traumatic the crisis is, the more easily they violate our rights, destroy our rights, eliminate our rights as human beings, but importantly as Americans. | ||
| From yesterday, this bombshell report, whistleblower documents show US and UK military contractors created a sweeping plan for global censorship in 2018. | ||
| And isn't it interesting that 2018 was when Alex Jones was kicked off of all of social media? | ||
| I would love to know the exact dates of this. | ||
| They're a little bit vague in this article, but I would love to know how soon after this working group, the CTIL, the Cyber Threat Intelligence League, I wonder how quickly after they came into being that suddenly every social media company in unison kicked Infowars and Alex Jones off of their sites. | ||
| I wonder if these are connected. | ||
| The year fits, I wonder if the day and month and week does. | ||
| But these whistleblower documents describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship programs to the role of the military and intelligence agencies partnering with civil society organizations and commercial media in the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques. | ||
| It's like, if you know their general modus operandi, none of this is new to you and none of this is surprising. | ||
| And you could have guessed this long ago, as we've pointed out, the true role, intent, and purpose of the Great Reset from the beginning. | ||
| But they elaborate on it here. | ||
| Over the last year, Public Racket, congressional investigators, and others | ||
| have documented the rise of the censorship industrial complex, a network | ||
| of over 100 government agencies and non-governmental organizations | ||
| that work together to urge censorship by social media platforms | ||
| and spread propaganda about disfavored individuals, topics, and whole narratives. | ||
| Stakeholder capitalism. | ||
| Neo-fascism. | ||
| That's what we're experiencing. | ||
| That's what we've been arguing against for years and years and years. | ||
| And if you're wondering why it didn't happen earlier, if you're wondering why this wasn't implemented years before, I don't think they realized how necessary it was for their despicable schemes to move forward. | ||
| And it might not be what we're saying, because it's kind of so obvious, but like, It's obviously not the speech that they care about in and of itself. | ||
| It's what the speech leads to. | ||
| And I honestly don't think that before 2016, I don't think they realized the political implications of allowing free speech. | ||
| I think they knew it to some degree, but I think the election of Donald Trump was out of the blue, totally unexpected. | ||
| I think it was at that point they realized we can't afford to take a soft touch with this. | ||
| We can't afford to gently ease humanity into the censorship because it turns out that the | ||
| silly memes they're making and the things they're saying that we sort of brushed off | ||
| before actually have the ability to get a president elected, actually have the ability | ||
| to make tangible change in the political system. | ||
| And that's really what they don't want. | ||
| So when the, you know, crap posting and 4chan memes, when they were just noise on the internet, | ||
| it didn't matter as much. | ||
| The moment Donald Trump got elected, it became real for these people. | ||
| And they realized, oh, we got to, we got to clamp this down. | ||
| We got to shut this down. | ||
| And I was just thinking about this yesterday because of what's going on with Owen and the | ||
| fact that Owen is search banned, AI algorithmically eliminated from social media, much in the | ||
| same way Alex Jones is because they want to stop him before he can become a politician, | ||
| before he can get elected, before he can actually use the free speech that the constitution | ||
| guarantees him to get power to make change. | ||
| If Owen Schroer was just talking to people, it wouldn't actually matter that much. | ||
| But what they really want to prevent is for the natural process to take place of the discussion that we're having leading to an awakening, leading to political activism, leading to a change in the system, leading to the destruction of the globalist world order and the fascism that they're attempting to implement. | ||
| So it goes on. | ||
| Now, a large trove of documents, including strategy documents, training videos, presentations, internal messages, reveal that in 2019, the U.S. and U.K. military and intelligence contractors, led by a former U.K. defense researcher, Sarah Jane, a.k.a. | ||
| SJ Terp, We're good to go. | ||
| Within cybersecurity institutions and counter-disinformation agendas, a heavy focus on stopping disfavored narratives, not just wrong facts, and pressuring social media platforms to take down information and prevent content from going viral. | ||
| Content goes viral, change happens. | ||
| They can't have that. Welcome back, folks, to this free speech platform as we attempt to defend... | ||
| The all-encompassing principle of free speech, which is really just an aspect or a vector of freedom itself, which is the ultimate aim of these people seeking to utterly and totally destroy the ability of humanity to stand up to them, prevent them from implementing their fascistic designs. | ||
| And it's all about control. | ||
| It's all about control. It all comes down to control. | ||
| So let's Let's tie them all together, shall we? | ||
| How do these things relate? | ||
| Censorship, surveillance, facial recognition, central bank digital currencies, the problem-reaction-solution program, the creation and then utilization of crises, the climate change agenda, migration, racism, hate speech. | ||
| All of these things are just, it's like we're looking at one diamond and it's just different faces on the diamond. | ||
| Different ways of looking at exactly the same object. | ||
| And so again, just from this article, whistleblower documents describe everything from the genesis of modern digital censorship program to the role of the military and intelligence agencies, partnerships with civil society organizations and commercial media, the use of sock puppet accounts and other offensive techniques. | ||
| It's all about bringing in, as they point out, the censorship industrial complex network of over 100 government agencies and non-governmental organizations working together with social media platforms to silence popular media. | ||
| Ideas or to censor truth. | ||
| And we showed the video a few days ago of the editor of Gripped, a media outlet in Ireland, being castigated and censured by his fellow mediaites for daring to publish the ethnicity or nationality of the attacker. | ||
| And he points out... | ||
| Okay, so we've moved on from disinformation to misinformation. | ||
| Now you're telling me I can't publish true information. | ||
| I can't publish the facts. | ||
| I can't publish what is real because of this censorship paradigm that you've established under the guise of hate speech. | ||
| So this is happening on a global level. | ||
| It's happening in particular with Western countries because Western countries are the only countries in the world that have constitutions that guarantee rights like this. | ||
| Western countries and those inspired by Western countries. | ||
| And so, of course, it is in Western countries that these crises are being manifested, being created, being fabricated, and then being utilized to destroy rights. | ||
| From Infowars, Trudeau supports partnership with EU for digital ID push, suggests it will help curb online, quote, disinformation. | ||
| So whether it's digital ID, central bank digital currencies, track and trace programs that they brought in through COVID, it's happening on an international level. | ||
| And in particular places that actually have protections against such things. | ||
| When it comes to Ireland, it's happening almost at breakneck speed where an Algerian guy stabs a bunch of children. | ||
| Irish people protest against that. | ||
| Now suddenly new facial recognition measures to help take on the rioters. | ||
| This from Irish Daily Mail. | ||
| In addition, Justice Minister to grant sweeping powers to the Irish police because they need to see private social media. | ||
| They bring in the migrants. | ||
| They cause the chaos. | ||
| They then use the chaos to implement restrictions to your freedoms, more surveillance, etc., etc. | ||
| In Germany, German MP is confident that the conservative AFD party can be banned because what's more democratic than banning the most popular party? | ||
| A prominent member of the ruling left-wing Social Democrats said he believes the AFD party can be banned, a move that many in Germany's left liberal establishment have long advocated despite AFD being the second most popular party in the entire country. | ||
| Spanish socialists tried to ban praying the rosary. | ||
| Catholics respond with more prayer. | ||
| This Monday, following orders from the government delegate in Madrid, the socialist Francisco Martin Aguirre or something, the police threatened to fine a group of Catholics for praying on the stairs of a church near the national headquarters of the Socialist Party. | ||
| Similar way that people are getting arrested for silently praying in the UK outside of an abortion clinic or arrested here in America for protesting abortion clinics. | ||
| It's the end of protest. It's the end of free speech. | ||
| It's the end of discussion. It's the end of any ability to even imagine a threat to their power. | ||
| And that's the ultimate point. | ||
| They don't want to have to, you know, fight you. | ||
| They want you to never even be able to understand why they should fight you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Message after the message. | |
| Spore-cita. | ||
| I'm a pioneer! I'm an explorer! | ||
| Bye. | ||
| I'm a human, and I'm coming! | ||
| I'm animated! | ||
| I'm alive! My heart's big! | ||
| It's got hot blood! Going through it fast! | ||
| I like to fight, too! | ||
| I like to eat! | ||
| I like to have children! | ||
| I'm here! I got a life force! | ||
| This is a human! This is what we look like! | ||
| This is what we act like! | ||
| This is what everybody was like before us! | ||
| This is what I am! I'm a throwback! | ||
| I'm here! I've got the fire of human liberty! | ||
| I'm setting fires everywhere! | ||
| And humans are turning on everywhere! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Get behind me, Satan! | |
| Down with the devil! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Down with the... This can't be. | |
| You're playing the wrong message. | ||
| Visit Infowars.com forward slash show today. | ||
| Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We'll move on from censorship, surveillance, all of that good stuff here. | ||
| In the third hour, we'll be joined by Ashton Forbes, making quite a splash. | ||
| Probably one of the most requested interviews we've done in a long time. | ||
| Lots of people reaching out saying, you got to have this guy on. | ||
| He has uncovered some truly disturbing things about the disappearance of flight MH370, that Malaysian airline flight that mysteriously disappeared in midair. | ||
| It's been causing a sort of firestorm on Twitter. | ||
| We're going to have him on to discuss it in the third hour. | ||
| I also want to tell you that Turbo Force Plus is back in stock. | ||
| Yes, folks, especially to the caller who called in and requested this two days ago. | ||
| Your wish is our command. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus back in stock. | ||
| Really an incredible product. | ||
| Fantastic energy. And as somebody who relies probably a little bit too much on caffeine on a daily basis, this stuff is so much more than a strong cup of coffee, so much better than any energy drink you want to try. | ||
| It has the same amount of energy, or even more so, I would say, but it's not a frenetic, jittery energy that you crash from. | ||
| It's a smooth energy. | ||
| It sort of tapers off a little bit. | ||
| But after a very long time, and best of all, this one little canister has dozens of servings in it. | ||
| If you break it down by price, especially now with 25% off, if you compare a daily glass of TurboForce to a daily energy drink, You're saving like hundreds of dollars by purchasing this canister. | ||
| So go now to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Get Turbo Force Plus. If you know somebody in your life who drinks too many energy drinks, get them Turbo Force Plus. | ||
| It's like giving a heroin addict methadone or whatever that stuff is. | ||
| Ease them out of their addiction to the poison chemical sugar. | ||
| And into the natural power of TurboForce, the natural extracts and vitamins and minerals that we use, utilize, and empower with TurboForce Plus. | ||
| Now 25% off and back in stock at Infowars Life, Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| You know, before we move on from the... | ||
| I haven't watched this video. | ||
| Before we move on from, like, the disinformation stuff, Dan Goldman, he's just always getting humiliated. | ||
| I mean, every time I see this guy, it's humiliation. | ||
| And it's happened again. And I haven't actually watched this. | ||
| I want to watch this live with everybody. | ||
| It's Dan Goldman being humiliated by Michael Schellenberger about the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number 11. | ||
| Here is Representative Dan Goldman making a fool out of himself. | ||
| Way that only he seems able to do. | ||
| Let's watch. We talked about the Hunter Biden laptop and how the FBI knew it existed. | ||
| You are aware, of course, that the laptop, so to speak, that was published in the New York Post was actually a hard drive that the New York Post admitted here was not authenticated as real. | ||
| It was not the laptop the FBI had. | ||
| You're aware of that, right? It was the same contents. | ||
| How do you know? Because it's the same content. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You would have to authenticate it to know it was the same content. | |
| You have no idea. You know hard drives can be manipulated. | ||
| Are you suggesting the New York Post could participate in a conspiracy to construct the contents of the Hunter Biden laptop? | ||
| No, sir. The problem is that hard drives can be manipulated by Rudy Giuliani or Russia. | ||
| What's the evidence that that happens? | ||
| Well, there is actual evidence of it, but the point is it's not the same thing. | ||
| So you're engaged in a conspiracy theory? | ||
| I'm glad you agree with me, Mr. | ||
| Schellenberger, that transparency is the most important thing. | ||
| And my last question for you is, do you think it would be transparent if Hunter Biden came to this Congress and testified in a public hearing, and more transparent than if he testified privately? | ||
| I mean, literally, I've never thought about that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have no idea. I've literally never thought about that. | |
| Is public testimony more transparent than private testimony? | ||
| Are you familiar with the First Amendment? | ||
| It's that the Congress shall take no action to abridge freedom of speech. | ||
| And that's what you just described. | ||
| Mr. Schellenberger, is 13% censorship still censorship? | ||
| Absolutely. And the other 87% is what we call the chilling effect that the courts have long recognized that they engaged in. | ||
| That is the problem. | ||
| There's a broad op... By the way, part of the operation... | ||
| I think Dan Goldman comes back here at the end. | ||
| Part of the operation was to change the terms of service. | ||
| So you see them constantly trying to change the terms of service. | ||
| You see them... It was 35% of the URLs that were according to EIP were labeled, removed, or soft-blocked. | ||
| That's all forms of censorship. | ||
| That censorship is not just removal. | ||
| But 65% were not. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So how can the government be so coercive? | |
| So his argument is because the government let through some information, they didn't censor any information? | ||
| He's saying it's okay because they only censored some large chunk of the data and not all of it? | ||
| This guy, man. | ||
| I hope he is humiliated. | ||
| I hope people are sending him this. | ||
| And that he's watching it and just feeling that gut feeling when you've done something really embarrassing and you think about it. | ||
| I hope later he's sitting there doing the dishes or something and he gets that wince. | ||
| You know that wince you get when you're like, I remember when I did that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I did that thing that was really embarrassing. | |
| Made me look like a total idiot on TV in front of the whole country. | ||
| Damn it, damn Goldman. | ||
| Why do you keep doing this to yourself? | ||
| I really hope he has that feeling later because that was very funny. | ||
| That was very funny. | ||
| I guess let's go back to it, but I had to pause because that's almost too much. | ||
| He's saying that, oh, they only censored 35%, what was it, 65%, but not the other 35%, so therefore shut up? | ||
| What the hell? Does he think that censorship is an all-or-nothing thing? | ||
| Does he think that the fact that people can speak to each other means there's no such thing as censorship? | ||
| Does he think that because some people can say things that comport with what the government wants, that that means there's no censorship? | ||
| That's how censorship works. | ||
| You silence the people saying things you don't want to be said. | ||
| It's like too stupid, man. | ||
| These people are too stupid. | ||
| They're too stupid. They're running our country. | ||
| And they're just dumb as a pile of bricks. | ||
| Let's go back to Mr. | ||
| Goldman here. The time of the gentleman has expired. | ||
| They're not censoring. They're flagging in the social media companies. | ||
|
unidentified
|
35% of a First Amendment? | |
| It's not the First Amendment. | ||
| It's the terms of service, as you said, and they are flagging it for the social media companies to make their own decisions. | ||
| That is not the First Amendment. | ||
| That is the terms of service. | ||
| So his argument is the government is working for the social media companies? | ||
| And I know that it's on appeal in front of the Supreme Court right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh boy. Oh boy. | |
| That was awkward. I didn't even mention the Hunter Biden thing. | ||
| That was really the dumbest thing that he said. | ||
| I mean, the fact that he would even bring it up shows you he ain't playing with a full deck. | ||
| He's missing some... | ||
| He's playing with one card that his kid colored on. | ||
| You can't even see what card it is anymore. | ||
| I mean, he's not... I honestly can't believe this. | ||
| He actually brought up the Hunter Biden laptop And suggested that it was right to censor it, even though the FBI had it, even though the FBI knew about it, even though it was confirmed. | ||
| I mean, Hunter Biden himself sued the New York Post, not for slander or libel, not saying they were lying, but because they published his private information. | ||
| He himself confirmed the veracity of the laptop. | ||
| Also, the laptop was chock full of original photos and videos. | ||
| That made it obvious that they were legitimately captured from Hunter Biden's laptop. | ||
| It wasn't just like a bunch of text that anybody could have written. | ||
| It was videos of Hunter Biden doing crack with hookers. | ||
| And the FBI and the intelligence agencies wrote an open letter saying it was Russian disinformation. | ||
| The state of our government, my God, if we can't do something about this, it's our fault, honestly. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, fighting legal battles is not fun and it's not cheap. | ||
| Trust me, we know all about that here at Infowars. | ||
| And now, unfortunately, I have become a big political target of the New World Order and of the Democrat Party and of the mainstream media. | ||
| I'm just one in a group of many that they are targeting, but boy oh boy are they coming after me now, and so I need your financial assistance at defendowen.com. | ||
| I'm going to have to have lawyers working on this case all the time, unfortunately. | ||
| It's not going to be cheap. | ||
| It's not going to be fun, but you can ease some of the stress, ease some of the financial | ||
| burden by going to DefendOwen.com if you're able to financially support. | ||
| Of course, your words of support mean everything. | ||
| Your prayers are paramount. | ||
| But DefendOwen.com for financial support so that I can be sure that I have the best legal | ||
| team for this defense, which is going to be key for free speech and for the truth and | ||
| to keep me on air. | ||
| Thank you for going to DefendOwen.com. | ||
| All right, welcome back ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| You know, there might be another aspect... | ||
| Now, we haven't considered to the censorship program being rolled out. | ||
| The surveillance, censorship, tracking campaign. | ||
| And it may be, you know, a necessary response to their established tactics not working anymore. | ||
| What I mean by that Is if you go back to Event 201, in a clip that we've played on this show quite a bit, and you look at the way they planned to deal with disinformation, there's a Chinese government agent of some sort who's sitting there in the Event 201 planning session before COVID was revealed to the world talking about how they would... | ||
| Use COVID as an excuse to bring about censorship and everything else they got with COVID. And the Chinese guy says, what do we do about people who are going to claim it's lab created? | ||
| Somehow they knew. Oh, we don't know how. | ||
| Somehow they knew that people would claim that this disease was lab created a month before it ever infected anybody. | ||
| How did they know? He asked this, and the person sort of running the session is, of course, Averill Haynes, who is the current DNI, Director of National Intelligence, the supreme organization above all the other intelligence agencies. | ||
| So she's the eye at the top of the intelligence pyramid now. | ||
| Back then, she was doing the same thing, but in a private capacity. | ||
| And her response was, it's okay. | ||
| She didn't say we're going to ask social media to remove those. | ||
| That wasn't her response. | ||
| Her response was, we're going to flood the landscape with our own story. | ||
| Her response wasn't, well, we'll silence anybody that says it was a lab leak. | ||
| She says we'll get the most respected institutions and media outlets in the world to push our version. | ||
| And that will dominate the airwaves. | ||
| That'll dominate the discussion. | ||
| So it wasn't about censorship as much as it was about using their outlets and their loyal corporations to push the story they want and just overwhelm and flood the market. | ||
| Here's the problem, though. | ||
| That only works if people trust you and think that you provide true information. | ||
| You can flood the All of these outlets with information, it doesn't do anything if everybody knows the mainstream outlets are full of crap and lie all the time. | ||
| So how does this all relate back? | ||
| Well, nobody trusts the mainstream media. | ||
| Nobody trusts the leftist media. | ||
| They are failing at an unprecedented rate. | ||
| Failing in a broad sense of not succeeding and getting their message across, but failing in a literal sense of they're all going bankrupt and closing down. | ||
| And so how are you going to flood the market with your version of the story, your fake lie, to overwhelm the truth if you're using outlets that nobody trusts or listens to or likes? | ||
| It's a little bit tricky. | ||
| So now they need to really ramp up the censorship to prevent the truth from getting out because their lies aren't having the same effect because everybody knows they're lying. | ||
| And we have a new corpse to add to the pile. | ||
| Vox is laying off employees.com. | ||
| From inside paper, this morning the Vox Media Union learned that the company intended to lay off several of our colleagues, a number of whom were members of our union. | ||
| The news is especially devastating in the midst of holiday season, and we are furious that management has short-sightedly opted to eliminate these essential roles. | ||
| Vox Media is, of course, a pile of trash. | ||
| And they deserve to be shut down entirely. | ||
| So we are celebrating this. | ||
| As yet another step towards sanity. | ||
| But let's just reminisce, shall we, about some of the more high-profile failures of leftist media in the last year. | ||
| Vox Media is the latest, like I said, corpse you can add to the pile, of failed lying outlets full of crap who nobody believes. | ||
| Washington Post has also said that involuntary layoffs could be next. | ||
| As they are hemorrhaging subscribers and nobody listens to them. | ||
| And so they're offering voluntary separation packages. | ||
| But if they don't take that, then, well, they're going to have to make some involuntary buyouts. | ||
| They're failing. They can't afford to operate. | ||
| They're shutting down. Nobody likes them. | ||
| Nobody reads them. Nobody wants to advertise them. | ||
| Because nobody cares what they have to say. | ||
| So, they're failing to. | ||
| Vox News, Washington Post, of course, we danced on the grave of Jezebel not too long ago. | ||
| Jezebel shutting down per Geo Media CEO. This was earlier this month, November 9th. | ||
| Jezebel, the punchy feminist blog with an outsized influence on internet culture, will suspend operations and lay off staff effective immediately. | ||
| Oh, you're dead. Sorry. | ||
| Whoops. Go spread your... | ||
| Destructive, hateful nonsense elsewhere. | ||
| Jezebel. MSNBC is canceling Mehdi Hassan's show, demoting him to fill-in host. | ||
| So sad. | ||
| So very sad. | ||
| Not really. Obviously, he's a dumb propagandist moron for MSNBC, and the fact that they're even operating is a surprise, frankly. | ||
| Of course, earlier this year in May, Vice Media filed for bankruptcy. | ||
| We danced on their grave as well. | ||
| And when I was dancing on the grave of Jezebel and celebrating the downfall of that contemptuous rag, somebody on Twitter was like, hey, you should be careful because it's going to be ironic when Infowars shuts down. | ||
| Here's the thing. Here's the thing. | ||
| I'm not going to deny that Infowars has been on shaky ground for a little while. | ||
| Everybody knows this. Is it because nobody watches us anymore? | ||
| Is it because nobody listens to us or goes to the website anymore? | ||
| Is it because we've lied over and over and people have just gotten sick of it and are no longer subscribing and we can't keep our numbers up? | ||
| Or is it because there's a concerted and widespread and massively funded effort to shut us down? | ||
| It's a little bit different. | ||
| It's actually not anywhere close to the same. | ||
| We are still... Dominating with a massive audience. | ||
| We are still getting tons of support from our loyal viewers, listeners, and we appreciate it more than we could possibly say. | ||
| These people, these organizations are failing despite not just support in a general sense, not just like, oh, they get pumped up the algorithm, which they do. | ||
| But support to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars injected into them year after year, they're still failing. | ||
| They're still collapsing because they're still lying and people don't want to listen to them anymore. | ||
| So our audience is still huge. | ||
| If InfoWars goes down in the next year, if this time next year there's no InfoWars to be spoken of, it's not because we failed of our own volition. | ||
| It's not because we lost trust of our audience. | ||
| We've been under concerted attack. | ||
| It's a little bit different. It's a little bit different, okay? | ||
| So even if we do, I'm not going to go, oh, gee, now I'm in the place of Jezebel. | ||
| No, we'll never be in the place of Jezebel. | ||
| We never will because our audience knows what to expect. | ||
| Our audience knows that they can trust us. | ||
| Our audience knows that we work day in and day out, seven days a week, 24 hours a day to bring them the truth, bring them the reality, and they in return support us at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| That hasn't slowed down. | ||
| That hasn't slackened. That hasn't gone away. | ||
| Instead, you know, we've been stabbed a thousand times and we're bleeding out, but that hasn't even succeeded. | ||
| Think about the difference between this. | ||
| Think about the leftist rags get, like Vice Media in 2017, $450 million. | ||
| They got injected with half a billion dollars four years ago and are failing. | ||
| We are under attack constantly and succeeding. | ||
| That's the difference. Sorry. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. | ||
| Let's continue a little bit, shall we? | ||
| With leftist media's utter, complete, embarrassing, and well-deserved collapse. | ||
| How's this for a timeline? | ||
| 2017, Vice Media secures $450 million investment from private equity firm. | ||
| 2019, George Soros pumps an additional $250 million into Vice. | ||
| 2023, Vice media files for bankruptcy. | ||
| Just think about the amount of money poured into this degenerate black hole. | ||
| It went from being worth $5.7 billion to worth nothing. | ||
| Nothing. Nothing. But it was, I guess, acquired by Soros. | ||
| Yeah, in 2017, they received $250 million. | ||
| I'm sorry, 2019. | ||
| In 2017, they got $450 million. | ||
| Sorry, my bad. | ||
| In 2019, two years later, an additional $250 million. | ||
| And a few years after that, they were gone. | ||
| Dead and destroyed. | ||
| Can you imagine? | ||
| Can you imagine? What Infowars would be able to achieve if we had some billionaire injecting half a billion dollars into us every couple years? | ||
| Again, I mean the comparison. | ||
| It's just like so many things that we talk about in terms of like persecution where it's not like we did something and they did something. | ||
| We got punished and they didn't. | ||
| It's like we didn't do the thing. | ||
| They did. We got punished. | ||
| They didn't. Infowars is still surviving. | ||
| Infowars is still chugging along. | ||
| Infowars is still going viral and changing the landscape and reporting on bombshell stories that you see show up in other outlets several days later. | ||
| We are still dominating our realm, despite being under continuous attack that has cost us millions of dollars. | ||
| These people get liquid cash injections every couple years and still can't remain afloat. | ||
| Goes to show. | ||
| Goes to show, doesn't it? | ||
| And if you're wondering why, if it perhaps occurs to you to wonder how this could possibly have happened, why Big Tech's fight against simple wars is unwinnable, the battle over Alex Jones illustrates how Facebook and YouTube's strength has become their greatest weakness. | ||
| Yeah, it's unwinnable because they're wrong and dumb, and we're right and awesome. | ||
| That's why. Just saved you having to read an article from Wired. | ||
| But in case you're wondering why Vice Media, how possibly you can go bankrupt despite half a billion dollars injected every couple years. | ||
| Well, I thought they were gone forever. | ||
| I thought May was like the last we'd ever hear of them. | ||
| I guessed George Soros came up with a couple other hundred millions of dollars. | ||
| From his friends in finance to keep it afloat a little bit, keep it operating for a little while longer. | ||
| But you don't hear much about Vice anymore. | ||
| Not to repeat myself, but because they're dumb and stupid and annoying. | ||
| But the only article I've seen go viral from them or be spread from them in the recent past was this one. | ||
| 100 ways white people can make life less frustrating for people of color. | ||
| Is this something that anybody wants to read? | ||
| Who's the target market for this? | ||
| Dumb, guilt-ridden white people? | ||
| Is this for people of color to just rag on white people? | ||
| Who is this article for? | ||
| I'll tell you who it's for. | ||
| It's for us to mock. Let's just go through some of these, shall we? | ||
| Just because you can't see racism around you doesn't mean it's not happening. | ||
| Trust people of color's assessment of a situation. | ||
| If they tell you it's racism, it's racism, and you're bad. | ||
| Okay? Even if it's obviously not. | ||
| You're not allowed to disagree with brown people. | ||
| Do you understand what Vice is telling you? | ||
| I just want to publish this in the reverse, just so people can hear what this sounds like. | ||
| Because America's been so programmed, decade upon decade, of at first subtle, now more overt, racist propaganda. | ||
| But could you ever imagine an outlet, especially a mainstream, popular outlet like, well, formerly popular outlet like Vice... | ||
| But on the right, being like, you need to trust white people. | ||
| Hey, brown people. Hey, non-white people. | ||
| When a white person speaks, you listen, okay? | ||
| When they tell you that it's not racism, it's because you're just not good at your job, you need to listen to them, alright? | ||
| They know what they're talking about. | ||
| They're white, after all. | ||
| Just love to see the inversion of this entire article. | ||
| Number two, don't assume that all people of color share the same views. | ||
| We are not a monolith. Great, I guess I can just disregard your entire article then. | ||
| Okay, great. | ||
| Is this news to anybody? | ||
| Newsflash here. I'm just getting this. | ||
| People of color don't always agree with each other. | ||
| Thanks, Vice, for telling us. | ||
| Incredible. Three, don't assume or guess people's races. | ||
| This is not a fun game for us. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, but it's fun for us. | |
| It's not supposed to be fun for you. | ||
| It's fun for us. I have the feeling this comes from some deep-seated... | ||
| Self-hatred or discomfort with who you are. | ||
| What would be... | ||
| It's funny because you can tell that this was written by somebody who was born in... | ||
| This was written by an American. | ||
| I've met and I know a lot of people of color who are immigrants. | ||
| They would not be offended by this at all. | ||
| Are you Ethiopian? | ||
| Look Ethiopian. They're like, I am. | ||
| How'd you know? Good eye. | ||
| How'd you know I was Ethiopian? | ||
| Like, nobody outside of America cares about this. | ||
| This is like a self-hatred thing from the person of color that wrote this. | ||
| Number four, if someone tells you they're from Uganda, don't say, quote, I went to Nigeria once, just please. | ||
| Well, why would I ever go to Nigeria? | ||
| Kidding, of course. Nigeria actually seems like a cool place sometimes when it's not embroiled in war. | ||
| But again, it's another one of these things where I'm just thinking, like I have so many examples of this where it's like I was riding in an Uber in D.C. one time. | ||
| The dude was from Cameroon. | ||
| And I didn't say I went to, you know, oh, I've been to the Côte d'Ivoire once. | ||
| But any intro, I was just like, oh, Cameroon, like West Africa. | ||
| I met another guy from Cameroon. | ||
| They're like, oh, yeah, no way. And I'm like, oh, yeah, you know, talking about his language and the different villages, all of their own different dialect. | ||
| And this is like insulting. | ||
| This is just insulting to the people of color who you're treating like fragile little children that are somehow ashamed of where they come from. | ||
| They're not. Not the ones I've met. | ||
| Why wait? So basically what they're saying is don't show interest in the origin of the foreign person that you're talking to. | ||
| Who are you talking to? Who is so sensitive about this? | ||
| This is stupid. This is just stupid. | ||
| Five, related. Don't refer to Africa as a country. | ||
| It's a continent and it's widely varied. | ||
| Yes, take a moment. | ||
| Again, who is this article for? | ||
| Who is this article for? | ||
| Is it for little children? | ||
| Yes, obviously Africa's not... | ||
| What? Take a moment? | ||
| I think you might need to take a little bit more than a moment. | ||
| Think about everything that your life has led to. | ||
| The fact that you're writing articles where the fifth point is Africa is a continent, as if that needs to be told to us. | ||
| Number six. Oh, and rest assured that literally no person of color ever wants you to get back from holiday, show off your tan, and excitedly claim, look, I'm almost as dark as you. | ||
| Cease and desist. Look, the only piece of information I'm retrieving from this article is that the person that wrote it needs help. | ||
| They need help. They need support. | ||
| They need mental illness awareness. | ||
| They need a little self-confidence. | ||
| They need to feel good about themselves as an individual and not as a part of some imagined group. | ||
| I'm so sorry for the people that you live with and around and talk to. | ||
| But most of us are normal and like having fun. | ||
| Alright, welcome back, folks. | ||
| We got more to cover. | ||
| I'm just loving this article, though. | ||
| I know I should have covered it when it came out. | ||
| And again, you know, it's just... | ||
| It really is kind of sad. | ||
| Because not only... I guess it's for white people, right? | ||
| They're telling us what to do and what not to do, even though they contradict each other like every other bullet point. | ||
| But I'm listening and learning. | ||
| Swallowing my privilege to listen. | ||
| But it's really, you know... | ||
| I think the really damaging aspect of this, it's both perpetrator and victim of imbuing people of color with some sort of inferiority complex. | ||
| That's what I see here. This is the inferiority complex article. | ||
| Because there's no way that you just naturally... | ||
| Learn to assume. | ||
| There's no way that you just automatically assume that somebody being like, I like your accent. | ||
| Where are you from? Your first impulse isn't to go, this person hates black people. | ||
| That's something that they're imparting on people of color. | ||
| In this article, what they're really doing is they're telling people of color... | ||
| If your white co-worker says some innocent, innocuous thing or just does something that's totally normal, you're supposed to read into it some racial grievance against you. | ||
| That's kind of what sucks. | ||
| Is that like totally normal, innocent things that most people would just understand or shrug off or not even notice? | ||
| They're like training people of color to be like, actually, that was racist, what she said. | ||
| And I almost want to see some of this like acted out. | ||
| Because all the white people she's describing seem very nice. | ||
| The last one I just read. | ||
| Rest assured that literally no person of color ever wants you to get back from holiday, show off your tan, and excitedly exclaim, look, I'm almost as dark as you. | ||
| Cease and desist. | ||
| Did this happen to this poor woman? | ||
| Did her coworker get back from vacation? | ||
| And she's like, hi, Janet. | ||
| Welcome back. Because you can tell. | ||
| You can tell this person is just seething with racial hatred against white people. | ||
| So you can already imagine how it would go, right? | ||
| This is some, I don't know, person of color. | ||
| Her co-worker gets back from vacation. | ||
| And it's like, oh my god, it was so much fun. | ||
| I just laid on the beach. | ||
| I did nothing. I'm so tan. | ||
| I mean, look how tan I am. I'm almost as tan as you. | ||
| But, you know, I'm good to be back. | ||
| Lots of work to do. But I'll see you at lunch. | ||
| Bye. And she's just like... | ||
| White devil. | ||
| It's just like a fun, casual little comment. | ||
| And this person is just like seething over it. | ||
| How dare they say a totally innocuous comment to me, a black person. | ||
| Incredible. Just absolutely incredible. | ||
| We're not supposed to use their memes. | ||
| We're supposed to understand that not all black people can run. | ||
| Not all Asian people can do math. | ||
| And not all indigenous people have drinking problems. | ||
| Just whatever. | ||
| Whatever. You just sound utterly and totally miserable and you want everybody else to be as miserable as you. | ||
| But then they say, when you endlessly complain about how terrible white people are, you are being that terrible white person. | ||
| So, are you being a terrible white person right now? | ||
| Is the author of this article... | ||
| By talking trash about white people for 100 bullet points, they're sort of taking on the now white attributes of hating white people. | ||
| Incredible. And they say things like this. | ||
| Don't question someone's blackness if they're light-skinned. | ||
| It's not your place. | ||
| Which makes perfect sense. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't even imagine. | |
| A black person being like, well, as a black person, a white person being like, wait, you're black? | ||
| But your skin is not as dark as that black person's. | ||
| So either, like, this person is surrounded by just morons, idiots, whatever, liberals. | ||
| Or they're just making up things that don't actually happen to get mad about something that doesn't exist. | ||
| But that's not the end of it. | ||
| They say it's not your place. | ||
| Question someone's blackness if they're light-skinned. | ||
| Thanks for letting us know. Other black people can make sure that light-skinned black people are cognizant of their privilege. | ||
| What an awful person to be around. | ||
| Making people cognizant of their privilege for being light-skinned. | ||
| Well, light-skinned are the white people of black people, so maybe you need to shut up and listen. | ||
| Anyway, it just goes on and on. | ||
| These people are miserable jackasses. | ||
| I'm sorry. I'm sorry to see that this is spoken from the perspective of all people of color as if all people of color are this insufferable. | ||
| Incredible. If a character you assumed was white in a book is portrayed by an actor of color in the movie, embrace it. | ||
| Whiteness is not the default. | ||
| Which has never happened in the history of media, I hate to tell you. | ||
| What happens is that explicitly, specifically white people, even historical white people that were in fact white and not even a figment of anybody's imagination, are being played by black people. | ||
| But I imagine we can't be upset about that either. | ||
| Just, honestly, I kind of love this article. | ||
| It is really hilarious. | ||
| Understand that some days are more mentally exhausting for people of color thanks to the news cycle. | ||
| Try not to badger us for our opinions on the latest atrocity that has just occurred. | ||
| Leave us to grieve. | ||
| Again, how many ways could you portray that? | ||
| Again, just co-workers at the coffee machine. | ||
| She's being like, man, do you see what happened yesterday? | ||
| Wasn't that crazy? And like another white guy going up being like, I don't. | ||
| She's black. She's exhausted. | ||
| She can't handle the news. | ||
| She's a black woman. | ||
| Have some consideration. | ||
| She's grieving about her blackness. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ha ha ha ha. | |
| Uhhhh. | ||
| I'm just like, what would it be like to be this person? | ||
| be like to be this person. | ||
| I'm just fascinated. | ||
| I'm sorry. I'm sorry I'm seeing so much time, but it is. | ||
| It is just incredible. | ||
| Absolutely incredible. Anyway, I mean, it's also funny because they seem to feel like all foreigners are people of color. | ||
| Because none of this, like all of these things could apply to any foreign person. | ||
| But maybe white foreign people have a greater, I don't know, capacity for being questioned about things. | ||
| You know, they say things like, don't say you went to Uganda once if you're talking to a Nigerian. | ||
| Or like, don't expect a foreign person to know everything about their country. | ||
| There's one of those in here. | ||
| Do you know everything there is to know about America? | ||
| I didn't think so. Yeah, that's what it says. | ||
| Don't assume a person of color knows everything about their country. | ||
| Do you know everything there is to know about America, Germany, Sweden? | ||
| That's what I thought. That's what I thought. | ||
| You don't know everything there is to know about your entire country. | ||
| So why should they? Germany, don't you guys have a new train in Frankfurt? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't know. I'm not from Frankfurt. | |
| Like, I don't know, but could you, I mean, would a German person be offended by that? | ||
| Probably not, but I guess it's not racist then. | ||
| It is racist if you ask the same question about a person of color, apparently. | ||
| I'm going by your rules, and your rules are nonsensical and actually hugely damaging. | ||
| Alright, I spent way too much time on that, but it's just, this is our competition. | ||
| This is our competition. This is the other side of the aisle. | ||
| We're over here, like, talking about your rights and free speech and, like, just trying to save humanity from a depopulation program that's releasing modified viruses and launching satellites with lasers on them. | ||
| And they're over there being like, um, white people, stop asking us how our day was, okay? | ||
| It was bad. | ||
| We're black. Alright. | ||
| If that's the important thing, I guess you focus on that. | ||
| We'll keep just focusing on things that matter with all of the cool people of color that aren't weird and abrasive. | ||
| Speaking of, foreign-born population of U.S. tops 49 million for the first time ever. | ||
| Nearly 50 million people living in the U.S. were born in another country, according to a shocking new report. | ||
| That's around 15% of the U.S. population born in a different country. | ||
| This, of course, not counting the untold millions of people that have crossed the border without even being tracked or noted in any such survey. | ||
| Now we'll be back on the other side with Ashton Forbes to talk about the groundbreaking discoveries he's made about the Malaysian flight that went missing. | ||
| I do want to remind you to go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It is the only way we get funding. | ||
| We do not have George Soros pumping $450 million into our organization, so we need you. | ||
| Go now to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Keep us on the air. Keep us in the fight. | ||
| We'll be right back. Welcome back ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is War Room. I'm your host Harrison Smith. | ||
| very happy to welcome my guest Ashton Forbes for possibly one of the most highly anticipated | ||
| interviews of my time at InfoWars, let alone hosting the War Room. | ||
| Ashton Forbes is an organizer of MH370X, a volunteer group dedicated to solving the mystery | ||
| of MH370 and the science behind the advanced technology deployed on the plane. | ||
| He's a government contractor with a security clearance unrelated to anomalous phenomenon, | ||
| but he's not bound by an NDA and everything revealed is publicly available information. | ||
| MH370X is the first ever community-led, crowdsourced investigation into this matter. | ||
| Ashton is simply the voice of the community. | ||
| His mission is true discourse on our terms without letting anyone set the narrative. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter and find all this information that he's posting at JustXAshton on Twitter and at YouTube, youtube.com slash JustXAshton. | ||
| Thank you so much for joining us today, Ashton. | ||
| Yeah, thank you very much for having me, Harrison. | ||
| Thanks to everybody at InfoWars for watching along today. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And a lot of people are. | ||
| Like I said, one of the most highly anticipated interviews we've had in a while. | ||
| A lot of people wanted us to have you on. | ||
| I'll admit, when I first saw your post start cropping up on my newsfeed, I was sort of like... | ||
| Flight 370, the one in Malay, that fell into the ocean, right? | ||
| I mean, I sort of ignored it for a while, but it kept coming and kept coming. | ||
| I started paying attention to it. Our crew members started going, are you looking into this 370 thing? | ||
| It's actually a pretty big deal. | ||
| So I started looking into it. | ||
| You're presenting some very interesting information. | ||
| Just give the folks out there an overview of what you've uncovered about this Malaysian air flight that disappeared over the South Indian Ocean. | ||
| Yeah, so right away, I just want to throw a quick shout out to Greg Reese, who has covered this and all the truth seekers out there, because without all the people who have been following along, keeping up with this investigation, we would not be where we're at today. | ||
| I think that at this point, we are ready to disclose potentially the largest verifiable conspiracy of all time. | ||
| And I know that's a bold claim to be making, especially on this show right now. | ||
| But as you just heard, I think the official narrative out there that this plane crashed in the South Indian Ocean is complete nonsense. | ||
| we can essentially prove that there's no chance that that's what happened to the plane. | ||
| There was no debris field found for this plane, even though it was the largest, most expensive search in | ||
| human history. | ||
| The official search did not find one piece of the plane. | ||
| If this plane had crashed into the ocean, there would be a debris field everywhere. | ||
| It would have been visible from space for days. | ||
| We would have seen it and found it the next day. | ||
| We have satellites everywhere as part of this investigation. | ||
| We uncovered this CIBR system, which is a real-time global persistent surveillance network. | ||
| It's basically monitoring the whole globe with a Google video playback. | ||
| We didn't find any black boxes. | ||
| The SOSA system didn't hear any acoustic detections. | ||
| Neither did the Western Australia or Diego Garcia hydrophones. | ||
| There's two radar systems, Indonesia and Australia. | ||
| Don't see the plane on radar, even though supposedly it's flying to the South Indian Ocean. | ||
| It's an active shipping route. | ||
| They say it crashes in the daytime, but nobody sees it. | ||
| There's no witnesses there. | ||
| The official narrative has it running out of gas. | ||
| The ocean's really big, but there's nowhere else for this plane to go. | ||
| It's running out of gas by the official narrative. | ||
| There's four emergency transponders that would go off when the plane crashes. | ||
| We don't get any detections from any of them. | ||
| There's 19 families of the victims who claim that they can call the victim's cell phone for up to four days, begging the governments to go look into these cell phones and why they're able to call them, including one who proves it on national television. | ||
| So just that weight of the evidence alone says the official narrative is not adding up. | ||
| Well, and I remember at the time, you know, seeing some of this evidence and thinking, okay, the obvious answer is that it was somehow hijacked remotely and maybe landed at that. | ||
| It was Diego Garcia's at the Air Force Base, very close to where it disappeared. | ||
| I remember that sort of being my conclusion at the end of the day when this first broke is that it must have been hijacked remotely and landed. | ||
| I mean, there's a lot to get into here because there's who was on the plane, what they're involved in, how that relates to what you've discovered. | ||
| And I am very interested to know how you got this imagery that we're seeing here, the videos and things, because it does almost seem too good to be true. | ||
| So I'm not suspicious of it because I think you've... | ||
| You've thoroughly debunked your debunkers, and that's a part of what you do that we'll get into. | ||
| But I'm just interested to know how you've gotten to this point, how much work it's taken, how much has gone on behind the scenes. | ||
| So again, I'm here with Ashton Forbes. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side to break down exactly what happened to MH370 and its mysterious disappearance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The war room with Harrison Smith is where the shields of truth are forged in the fires of inquiry. | |
| Ray. | ||
| you Ashton Forbes can be followed on Twitter at JustXAshton. | ||
| He's recently published an open letter to Congress. | ||
| He says, my name is Ashton Forbes and I'm currently disclosing the most important videos in the history of the world. | ||
| Quite a claim, but I think he can back that claim up because If what you've discovered is really what happened, this is a very big deal. | ||
| So, if you can, what happened to MH370? What happened to this plane? | ||
| So this plane takes off from Kuala Lumpur headed to Beijing at 1642 UTC. And we like to talk about UTC times because it makes it a little simpler to understand. | ||
| At 40 minutes into this flight, we have the final communication that's publicly available that says, good night, Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. | ||
| 64 seconds later, this plane goes dark. | ||
| So this is the part where we believe that a lithium-ion battery fire breaks out, either that it's sabotage or that it happens accidentally. | ||
| There is almost 500 pounds of lithium-ion batteries on board this plane, which are extremely dangerous things to be having in the cargo bays. | ||
| They were outlawed later on. | ||
| And at the same time, there's a witness, Mike McKay, sees the plane on fire from an oil rig just in the max distance you could see a plane at cruising altitude. | ||
| He only sees it on fire for about 5 to 10 seconds. | ||
| The plane goes dark and turns around. | ||
| At this point, there's a Wired article that mentions that the correct course of action, if you had a fire scenario, would be to pull the buses to basically reset all the computers in there, and then your plane would go dark. | ||
| Around the same time when this plane goes dark, there's nine witnesses along the coast to hear loud noises as well. | ||
| All of these witnesses end up getting discredited in addition to every other witness I'm going to talk about. | ||
| Ten minutes later, this plane turns around. | ||
| It's flying towards Penang-Lonkawi International Airport, the closest airport that you would go to in an emergency situation where you could land a 777 at night. | ||
| And 10 minutes later, we have the situation where now a communication is heard by a 777 pilot who doesn't want to be named because they probably don't want to lose their job like Mike McKay did, saying that they hear the co-pilot and or co-pilot with some static, and they don't give any more information about the communication. | ||
| At the same exact time, there's eight fishermen who are off the coast of Thailand and Malaysia, and they actually see the plane flying very low. | ||
| Now, contrary to the narrative that this was somehow a suicide route, we've already developed now that they're going to the closest airport. | ||
| We see this plane flying low, which indicates that they are trying to save the passengers if there was a depressurization event, because you need to fly low in order to give the passengers enough oxygen to breathe. | ||
| So the plane gets to Penang, and weirdly, if you watch the Malaysian Minister of Defense interviews, this is a very sketchy guy. | ||
| He claims that this plane was unidentified on radar, but that they knew it was a civilian airliner, and that they knew that this plane was not hostile. | ||
| The only way that you can know that, assuming there's a hijacking scenario is at play, a pilot suicide scenario is at play, is if you actually have communication with the plane. | ||
| They also don't send up any jets, which people have really attacked them for. | ||
| The most likely answer is because they know it's not a scenario where you need to send jets up. | ||
| It's an emergency event. Potentially even the United States government is going to take control of the situation. | ||
| It gets to Penang at 1752 UTC, which is about 30 minutes after it goes dark. | ||
| For whatever reason, it doesn't land there. | ||
| We have speculated that it could be because the lights are not on. | ||
| It's a third world country. It's 2 in the morning, essentially. | ||
| The airport would have been closed. | ||
| It wouldn't have been safe to land for whatever reason. | ||
| Perhaps the landing gear was damaged. | ||
| Perhaps they couldn't dump the fuel because of the fire scenario. | ||
| It would have been too dangerous. Whatever the case may be, they fly over the airport. | ||
| The co-pilot's cell phone pings the cell tower down below, meaning they might have been trying to call for help. | ||
| Recently, people have told me as well that it's possible that they didn't realize it was an emergency event until after it gets towards Penang and after Penang, so they may not even have been able to communicate with the airport to tell them, hey, turn the runway lights on so we can land. | ||
| Whatever happens, this plane goes through the Straits of Malacca, into the Andaman Sea, and to the Nicobar Islands. | ||
| This is still the agreed-upon flight path. | ||
| The official time when this plane lost signal, 1840 UTC. That's about an hour or two hours after this plane takes off, and now about an hour after it flies over Penang. | ||
| They changed this time several days later, and they claimed that the last communication was really no 1815 or 1822 UTC based on some radar data. | ||
| The reason why this is important is 1840 UTC and this point in the Nicobar Islands is where the official narrative says this plane turns into the South Indian Ocean. | ||
| Our approach, our narrative, our story says this is where the videos are happening. | ||
| And the reason we know this is in the satellite video, we can actually see the coordinates in the bottom left-hand corner of the screen. | ||
| And the coordinates indicate the Nicobar Islands right there. | ||
| So what we did is we looked up all the satellites and we could look up amateur trajectories. | ||
| We found out USA 229 was right there in the location where it could send the data needed to create this satellite imagery that we're seeing. | ||
| And we found out that it was right at 1840 UTC. Then we find out there's a witness. | ||
| The last witness is down there on a boat, Kate T. She's going from India to Phuket, Thailand. | ||
| She sees a glowing orange plane flying low descending with black smoke coming out of it. | ||
| When we look at our videos, we're seeing something come out of both of our videos at the back of the plane, which could potentially be smoke. | ||
| It's too low for it to be contrails because this plane is very low. | ||
| We can see these cumulus clouds right next to it that only form between 1,000 and 5,000 feet. | ||
| We even checked the weather. | ||
| The weather within 15 minutes is consistent with these low cumulus clouds as well. | ||
| So Catherine T's sighting, even the direction of travel of the plane in her sighting, which they were able to recreate from the automatic GPS, is consistent with the videos and the story we've put forth of the fire. | ||
| Now, lastly, what I'll say is some people have said, probably, they're thinking, well, you just told me they didn't find any debris, but some debris washed up on some shores. | ||
| That was not part of the official search at all. | ||
| Some of that debris actually has burn marks on it. | ||
| The parts that have burn marks are consistent with the honeycomb pattern of a Boeing airplane. | ||
| There's also a piece of debris that's not reported, which is a fire suppression device from a B777 that washes up in the Maldives a couple weeks later. | ||
| The Maldives is intentionally ignored and not included in the search for whatever reason. | ||
| There's even a serial number visible on it. | ||
| If you guys Google it, you'll be able to see it, which would potentially have tied it to the plane. | ||
| So the scenario that we put forward with this fire event happening, completely consistent with the tiny amounts of debris, less than 1% of the plane that they found. | ||
| And then in our videos, we see the magic happen. | ||
| And I almost wish that we didn't see these orbs in the videos, which I think is US government third party contractor technology. | ||
| And I almost wish we didn't see this event, this zap that we see where the plane disappears. | ||
| Because if you took that out of these videos, I don't think anyone would have any hard time believing that the videos are real. | ||
| And we would be able to uncover the truth and the conspiracy that the U.S. government did something to this plane. | ||
| But because we have these orbs, it's just shattering the minds, ontological shock of the UFO community, of really everybody out there, because it defies everything that we've been told could be true. | ||
| So what are the orbs? | ||
| Because I agree with you. | ||
| That's what I think I said earlier. | ||
| It's almost too good to be true or something. | ||
| I mean, you see these orbs and it's like, well, what are they? | ||
| Yeah, and so what we see that is happening here is we're seeing a non-radiating barrier. | ||
| We're not looking at a metal sphere here. | ||
| We're looking at an object that's creating a field that is displacing itself from space-time. | ||
| And when it does that, what it can do is reduce the mass of the object to zero. | ||
| If you've reduced the mass of the object to zero, now you can float freely. | ||
| Now you can accelerate at speeds that would be impossible for conventional craft, which is what we're seeing happen with these orbs where they're traveling at roughly Mach 3 speeds, as estimated by comparing it to the plane, which is a 777 turning wall in descent. | ||
| It's maxing out its capabilities in both videos that are perfectly in sync with one another. | ||
| So what originally I had hypothesized, which engineers have now reached out to me, theoretical physicists have reached out to me and essentially confirmed, is that we're talking about room temperature superconductivity essentially being the key that is unlocking this technology. | ||
| And there are certain shapes, toroids, which can essentially trap the electromagnetic fields and amplify them to a degree where you can create this space-time barrier around the object. | ||
| That is allowing these orbs to travel at these speeds. | ||
| And then we also, even just very recently, the pattern they're creating is a 120 degree sinusoidal zero point energy pattern. | ||
| And what this means is these orbs could be essentially locking on to the plane. | ||
| They can be both attracting and repelling from one another, which is why we see this perfect triangle formation going around them. | ||
| Now, when I first saw these videos, I thought, this has to be technology that's thousands of years advanced. | ||
| It has to be non-human intelligence. | ||
| It's just too far out there. | ||
| But the more I've dug into this case, the more I've realized this is not non-human intelligence. | ||
| This is our version of what potentially that might look like. | ||
| This could be the first revelation of this technology in human hands. | ||
| We have a lot of questions, folks. | ||
| Stay tuned. We're just scratching the surface. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The War Room. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| Ashton Forbes is my guest. | ||
| You can follow him on Twitter at JustXAshton. | ||
| And especially for our radio listeners, you've got to go to the Twitter because you've got to see the videos. | ||
| I mean, if you're a television viewer, if you're on Bandit Video, you're seeing what I'm talking about. | ||
| But if you're a radio listener, how do I even describe this? | ||
| It's what looks to be an infrared shot of a plane flying and circling the plane. | ||
| I don't have the words to describe this, Ashton. | ||
| But, I mean, there's three orbs that are circling the plane that seem to sort of come out of nowhere, and they're circling the plane, and then I guess it just disappears. | ||
| Like I said, there's so many questions to get to here, Ashton. | ||
| I guess first is... How did you even get these videos? | ||
| Where are these videos from? What angle are we even looking at here? | ||
| Is this a satellite that's a top-down view? | ||
| Or is it at some angle to the Earth? | ||
| What are these videos? Yeah, so the satellite view, we're looking down. | ||
| I think that that's how little understanding we have of what the satellite capabilities are in the United States. | ||
| And that's why when we found this CIBRS video, where you can just Google this for your radio listener, go to the Videos tab, you'll see Lockheed Martin's website, Global Persistent Surveillance Monitoring. | ||
| They have capabilities that are essentially Google Earth, but with video playback. | ||
| And they can probably just pull back anything they want, anytime, anywhere they have a satellite that can pull information back. | ||
| The cyber system, the intention is tracking missiles, boats, planes, intelligence, and battlefield awareness, all consistent with what we're seeing in the videos here. | ||
| These videos date back to 2014. | ||
| I actually remember seeing the drone video, which is the colorized Electro-IR camera produced by Raytheon, a multi-spectral camera, back in 2014, but my conscience has not risen to the point where I could even understand what I was looking at that time. | ||
| We actually believe that the person these videos were leaked to, Regicide Anon, a YouTube account, they probably didn't even know that what they were looking at was real. | ||
| And that the leaker, US military personnel, had to convince them that what they were looking at was real. | ||
| They probably had to tell them, hey, you're looking down here in this as well. | ||
| You're not looking up in this satellite footage. | ||
| You can find the links if you go to my Twitter. | ||
| Top of my pinned tweet is all evidence, which is 12 pages long. | ||
| We're probably not going to be able to get through all of it today. | ||
| I just want to hit the key points for people out here. | ||
| You can find those archive links that prove these videos go all the way back to 2014. | ||
| The first video even says, received March 12, 2014. | ||
| Just four days after the plane disappeared. | ||
| That's that satellite video. | ||
| We can see that drone is cropped out in the satellite video. | ||
| We can see from the drone video, this HUD data has been removed. | ||
| If we look at those 2017 DOD Navy FLIR videos, we can see that it looks very similar to that, but the leaker is added using the onboard software, this thermal layer. | ||
| And the reason why people do that is they want to show more details. | ||
| In the case of the drone video, we can tell which details they really wanted to stick out. | ||
| They want us to see that there's trails in front of the orbs, forward-facing gravity engine, What's happening is orbs are creating their own geodesics. | ||
| Not only are they ignoring gravity, they're creating their own gravity and pulling themselves along like train tracks on it. | ||
| And so we can also see there's a thermal signature within the orb that's spinning as well. | ||
| And from talking to Bob Greenier, an engineer, he says that this is due to the toroidal effect that's inside of these orbs from the, I'm going to say it incorrectly, the fractal toroidal moments that are happening. | ||
| And essentially what this is is where it's able to magnify, amplify this electromagnetic signature in order to create this forward-facing engine that we see that's actually distorting the atmosphere. | ||
| It's why we see this cold trail in front of it. | ||
| Potentially you might even be able to see this if someone were to look up and watch. | ||
| Now, when they're spinning around, they also have some purpose here. | ||
| It looks like they are mapping the plane, getting it ready for this event that they're about to have it undergo, and then about halfway through their pattern, all of a sudden, the orientation changes. | ||
| It becomes a ring around the plane, and it goes vertical. | ||
| And then right before this zap happens, in the thermal especially, we see a lot of detail where these orbs converge on the plane. | ||
| And in the last frame, before we see this plane get encompassed and undergo this macroscopic phase conjugation, which is a phase change of the plane from macro to quantum, that we actually see the orbs flatten and we see the plane itself begin to blur. | ||
| Now this has been described as the time of the plane is speeding up. | ||
| It's accelerating. It's approaching superluminal speeds, the speed of light, essentially. | ||
| So when I say teleportation, it's a bit of a crude approximation. | ||
| What's really happening here is that a unifying theory of quantum and macro has been uncovered. | ||
| The military-industrial complex has had access to it for at least 10 years. | ||
| And what this allows is for stuff that we would think to be magic, but is adequately described by the double-slit experiment, the most mysterious experiment in physics. | ||
| And so this plane, and just recently on my podcast that I just put together just to be able to understand the science, I had Dave Rossi, who is a DOD contractor and engineer himself, hypothesize that there's a fourth orb. | ||
| And the fourth orb is in the destination of travel, wherever you want this to go to. | ||
| And it's entangled to the other three orbs. | ||
| And so the idea of what's happening here is this plane is being teleported, quote unquote, at the speed of light, maybe even faster than the speed of light, you know, using quantum teleportation, quantum entanglement to the location of that fourth orb. | ||
| Now we can't really prove where that would be because we don't have two high quality military videos on the other side. | ||
| But we can say that this is happening right there in the Nicobar Islands. | ||
| And this is the reason, as hard as it is to believe, that we weren't able to find any plane, even after 10 years almost. | ||
| After looking in the most expensive search, looking above water, below water, why we didn't get any acoustic detections, is that this is the scenario that makes the most sense. | ||
| And that's what's most compelling about these videos is... | ||
| Without these, we would have never solved the case. | ||
| And I think that the leaker who was probably watching on an airplane, tracking the plane, who was looking at the drone footage, who was probably watching the cybersystem, tracking the plane, also realized no one's going to ever solve this case unless they leak this footage. | ||
| So this was leaked footage, and it's two different videos, one from a drone and one from a satellite. | ||
| There's so much information that you've provided. | ||
| I'm just trying to keep it all in tracks. | ||
| As you said, I don't have the scientific wherewithal to even understand what I'm looking at here, but it's making sense the way you're describing it. | ||
| So one was a satellite, one was a drone. | ||
| Both of these were leaked and have been available on the internet since 2014, but only now with you and the work that you're doing with MH370X are these being made publicly available and explained satisfactorily. | ||
| Yeah, the explanation is the hardest part, right? | ||
| That's what we had been missing, is that we needed those FLIR footage from 2017. | ||
| We actually probably needed Trump to post that satellite picture. | ||
| Because when that picture got posted in 2019, a lot of people thought it couldn't be real. | ||
| They thought there had to be more atmospheric distortion if that's an image from space. | ||
| But the answer is, it's not necessarily just an image from space. | ||
| If you watch the SIBRS video on Lockheed Martin, they give away the secret, which is that they are constantly surveilling the whole world in IR satellites all the time, and they're building a computer program that's taking all that data, just like Google Earth, but it has video playback. | ||
| When you watch Google Earth, you're not watching the satellites move, but you can still see the images, right? | ||
| Now imagine if they're doing that all the time, every second. | ||
| And this is why in our satellite video it's six frames per second, because it's a huge field of view that is constantly building this real-time video playback that can also be recorded and played back anytime they want. | ||
| And what we were able to uncover early on and why I started to get invested in the case was that there's a mouse in the satellite video. | ||
| Some people think it's a bird, but there's actually a black mouse. | ||
| Like a computer indicator, arrow, mouse. | ||
| Yep. And that's not what's moving the screen, is that the satellite coordinates don't change when that mouse moves around. | ||
| They're using like a trackball or some other analog to move the perspective around. | ||
| And what we found out is that that mouse... | ||
| Hold on. Stay there. We've got to go to break. | ||
| But the amount of hidden technology that's being revealed right now... | ||
| Sort of overwhelming. | ||
| This is kind of fun for me. | ||
| I'm sort of the audience as well, where I'm just trying to wrap my mind around what's going on here. | ||
| We'll be back on the other side with Ashton Forbes. | ||
| Oh my god! Alright, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I don't know if you caught it there at the end of that last break, but here I am learning | ||
| about this incredible technology, this bizarre mystery unfolding in front of me. | ||
| I'm getting goosebumps. | ||
| I'm already in a heightened state of sensitivity. | ||
| And suddenly Alex Jones comes busting in, yelling, practically made me jump out of my | ||
| chair. | ||
| But obviously, a lot of people are very excited about this information, and he wants to have | ||
| you on tomorrow to really hammer this out. | ||
| Ashton Forbes is my guest at JustXAshton on Twitter. | ||
| And like I was saying at the end of the last segment, I love interviews like this because | ||
| it's not even a back and forth. | ||
| I'm just an avatar for the audience learning along with them. | ||
| And hopefully I can ask the same questions that I know are rattling around the heads of our listeners and viewers right now. | ||
| And I guess the first one would be, you know, we know that... | ||
| They've been experimenting with anti-gravity technology as early as probably the 40s. | ||
| A lot of the early UFO sightings were a part of this. | ||
| As Greg Reese put in his report about what Ashton Forbes and the MH370X group has been revealing. | ||
| The Bell, or however you say it in German, but it's been around for a while. | ||
| Now you're talking about quantum mechanics, free energy, anti-gravity technology. | ||
| Why now? | ||
| Why do it to this plane? | ||
| Why risk disclosure of this? | ||
| And why haven't we seen it since? | ||
| Why did they do this now? | ||
| Yeah, these are got to be the most highly guarded secrets that are out there. | ||
| I would imagine the only reason why I haven't been dealt with is that they just must assume that Russia and China have already figured out. | ||
| I mean, if we've figured this out from a Twitter account, then, you know, I hope those intelligence communities have. | ||
| Because if they haven't, then we're just so far ahead and they don't even matter at this point. | ||
| Now, you know, I think that there's warring factions in the government that some people want this out, some people don't. | ||
| As people can probably tell from online, this stuff is shattering various communities in half. | ||
| A lot of people can't believe this stuff to be real. | ||
| It means that we've been getting lied to for a long time. | ||
| I think that within the government, there's certain factions that say we have to stop the lies. | ||
| And that's my opinion, too, is that we have to get the truth out there. | ||
| This technology can change the whole world. | ||
| We don't need to be driving around in cars. | ||
| We don't need to have planes that are using chemical rockets. | ||
| We don't need any of this stuff anymore, essentially. | ||
| Anti-gravity technology is real and it's out there. | ||
| They took a huge risk doing this to the plane. | ||
| And I don't think they thought it would leak. | ||
| The risks and the consequences of somebody leaking this are huge. | ||
| We've speculated that the person that leaked this didn't even know that they were looking at U.S. anti-grav technology, if you want to call it that. | ||
| They probably just thought they were looking at UFOs. | ||
| And they thought, oh, I'm going to leak this UFO video because it's going to tell people that UFOs took the plane. | ||
| And then later on, when they start getting charged with life in prison for espionage, they realize, oh crap, I screwed up. | ||
| Like, this is actually our technology. | ||
| I just gave away our trump card potentially to Russia and China who are going to be able to figure this out, right? | ||
| So, you know, the motive here in our minds from looking into this case is the 20 free-scale semiconductor engineers on board this plane. | ||
| We found more evidence that ties these people to the plane than I thought would be possible. | ||
| It's not going to be about these patents that are out there. | ||
| That's a red herring. You know, those patents are actually owned by the company despite being an individual's people's names. | ||
| But I do think it's about the technology that they were working on. | ||
| A semiconductor is just a non-perfectly conductive superconductor. | ||
| Now, we found a 2005 NSA National Security Agency report. | ||
| I couldn't believe we found this. | ||
| It talks about commercial emergence of room temperature superconductors. | ||
| And room temperature superconductors are what makes all the magic happen here. | ||
| This is where we talk about floating objects. | ||
| This is where we can create magnetic fields that are so powerful that they can break the vacuum energies of space-time, where you can create these bubbles that we see that allow these objects to float. | ||
| This company is referenced nine times in this report, and the report starts off by saying that this could be available by 2010 or 2012, and this was back in 2005, but then it concludes by saying only if government intervention gets involved. | ||
| And not just that, but we also found out that this company is actually tied directly to United States aerospace and defense, and that there's actually a press release they put out saying that they had a major initiative dedicated to serving RF power needs for U.S. aerospace and defense. | ||
| So if you think about it from the perspective of this fire emergency event, then you say, well, the motive is you don't want to lose this intellectual property. | ||
| Maybe you can't afford to lose it. | ||
| These people are directly tied potentially to the technology we see in the videos. | ||
| Now, if you flip it around and say, well, this fire maybe was started as espionage, you know, maybe this whole thing was espionage from the beginning. | ||
| Now you're trying to prevent these people from going to China with their intellectual property. | ||
| Twelve of them are Malaysian nationals, eight of them are Chinese nationals, but they're working for an American company. | ||
| The story that is that they're going to upgrade the plants there in China. | ||
| So that could be your motive. | ||
| And then several people have also speculated that, well, maybe the motive is this plane's doomed. | ||
| If it tries to land in the ocean, it's going to rip apart. | ||
| Everybody's going to drown in the middle of the night. | ||
| So maybe you just pull out your secret project that says, okay, if there's a doomed plane, we're going to test out this technology and see if we do this macroscopic phase conjugation to the plane, that will people actually survive it, right? | ||
| Or are we going to have a Philadelphia experiment occur where people are stuck in the hull of the ship, right? | ||
| Mm-hmm. So, again, just, you know, when I think about conspiracy and I try to determine whether or not there's something there, I just think of my, if I'm trying to perpetrate this, if I'm the one who's coordinating or orchestrating it, I would think, okay, if we want to get rid of this plane or we want to make this plane disappear, we want to take out these 20 semis, whatever it is, there's easier ways to do it. | ||
| You could hijack it remotely. | ||
| You could hit it with a missile. | ||
| What would validate or make reasonable decisions The usage of this technology for this plane in particular. | ||
| What is it about this plane? | ||
| Is it the 20 scientists that were on board? | ||
| Were they transported somewhere else and may still be alive? | ||
| What is it that would make this worthy of using this technology when you could destroy the plane or make it disappear in easier ways? | ||
| Yeah, and that's why I think it's not destruction, because you can just let this plane crash, everybody's going to be doomed, right? | ||
| And, you know, maybe it's a matter of government's just really great people, and they're just trying to save a plane because it's a matter of opportunity. | ||
| Now, I don't think that our audience here is going to believe that, but, you know, maybe. | ||
| So that's why I think that it's really about self-serving needs, is that the people on board had intellectual property they couldn't afford to lose. | ||
| And all those conspiracy theories that you were mentioning before all say the plane went to the same location, Diego Garcia Military Base. | ||
| That's also where I'm going to speculate that this plane went to if I had to gamble. | ||
| There was a sighting in the Maldives early in the morning that they see a jumbo jet with the red and white stripe of Malaysian Airlines. | ||
| The issue was it was from the wrong direction, and it was at 6.15 in the morning, which was far too late in the morning for this to be the plane. | ||
| But if we have this teleportation kind of capabilities, faster than light travel, then it brings that back into play. | ||
| Right. Well, and that's what I'm wondering. | ||
| I mean, I know Diego Garcia is close by, but if you're talking about teleportation, does physical proximity even matter at that point? | ||
| Yeah, not really. | ||
| I mean, again, we don't know exactly how and where this plane ends up going. | ||
| When we look at it in the thermal, we see this cold event. | ||
| This is an endothermic event. | ||
| This is not an explosion that's happening. | ||
| It's an absorption of energy. | ||
| Explosions are exothermic events, releases of energy. | ||
| So these runaway lithium-ion battery fires, the reason why they're so dangerous is they keep coming back up every time you put it out. | ||
| Just like one of those candles, it's those trick candles. | ||
| But if it's an absorption of energy that's happening, it's possible the event itself is absorbing the energy from the batteries, making it so that fire is out permanently. | ||
| And now you can have your plane be anywhere. | ||
| Part of what we don't know is, can you just set this plane down with this teleportation and have the inertia be completely removed? | ||
| Or does it have to still obey the laws of conservation momentum and still be moving? | ||
| If so, then you need to move this plane somewhere else in the sky where it would still be flying, or potentially you could just move it anywhere you want. | ||
| But since we have this sight in the Maldives, and I happen to believe all these witnesses actually saw the plane, I think that they moved it somewhere else and then they flew it and flew it low again is what the sighting was in the Maldives to Diego Garcia, which is the logical place to hide this plane. | ||
| There's no commercial jets can land there. | ||
| They've got a protected zone around it. | ||
| It's got a known CIA black site where there's prisons underneath there that was revealed by a FOIA request many years ago. | ||
| If you look at it on Google Earth Pro, All the airplanes after 2014 just disappear from the runway. | ||
| It's like I would guarantee there's an elevator that allows planes to go underground there and they have an underground hangar somewhere. | ||
| And then this also allows for this tiny bits of debris that they found, which is totally consistent with our scenario of a fire and this teleportation. | ||
| You just rip off the flapperon and throw it in the water, right? | ||
| And then now it washes up on the shore later on. | ||
| And this flapperon as well Hold on right there, Ashton. | ||
| We've got to go to break. I mean, this really is fascinating. | ||
| What we're dealing with here really takes you out of the realm of logic and understanding this into just bafflement on my half. | ||
| All right, welcome back, folks. This is, unfortunately, our final segment with Ashton Forbes. | ||
| And if you're as intrigued by all of these revelations as I am, you've got to go to JustXAshton on Twitter, at JustXAshton. | ||
| He's got a pinned tweet that is extremely thorough. | ||
| As you said, something like 12 pages of information. | ||
| The comments are replete with people trying to debunk him and he debunking the debunkers. | ||
| I mean, you could really go down several rabbit holes here. | ||
| But I also think your letter to Congress is very concise and has a lot of this information in it. | ||
| And so you can go to Ashton Forbes' account, his profile, and see the letter to Congress there that gives more of a general overview of this. | ||
| And of course, Greg Reese put together a video and also just text me to tell you hello, and he's glad to see you on here, as I am as well. | ||
| So this is our last segment, and I still have a lot of questions, as I'm sure you do too, but... | ||
| What do you want people to take away from this? | ||
| Just what is the surface level understanding if people can walk away with one sentence or one paragraph of understanding as to the totality of what you've uncovered? | ||
| What would that one idea be? | ||
| Well, first, I want to go ahead and give my condolences to the families of the victims who have been lied to and gaslit by the world and the world governments over what really happened to this plane. | ||
| I cannot imagine what they've been going through, and that's ultimately the reason why we're doing this, to vindicate them, to vindicate the witnesses who are... | ||
| The pilots were vilified and potentially the leaker who went to prison. | ||
| We'll save that potentially for tomorrow for a nice big reveal. | ||
| But what these videos have to do is the largest cover-up potentially of any type of crash or anything that we've ever had in the history of the world, or at least pretty far up there. | ||
| But the technology pushes it over the limit. | ||
| This now becomes the biggest verifiable conspiracy of all time. | ||
| That there's technology out there that renders all wars obsolete. | ||
| People are dying for no reason. | ||
| These wars out there are just for money and that we have been getting lied to potentially for our whole lives about what the course of human history really could be. | ||
| If we have access to this technology, we can reshape the entire world. | ||
| And this is why it's potentially being covered up. | ||
| There's national defense implications to this. | ||
| Whoever controls this technology is going to control the world. | ||
| Just a few examples of what this technology could lead to. | ||
| It's not just teleportation. | ||
| We could actually have cloaking. | ||
| We could have force fields potentially. | ||
| We can have fusion power. | ||
| Free energy is actually on the table here as well. | ||
| It's not just all good, though, as well. | ||
| It is doomsday weapons. | ||
| People talk about nuclear weapons. | ||
| Yes, nuclear weapons are very powerful. | ||
| Doomsday weapons can blow up suns. | ||
| So this is potentially the reason why this information has been held secret. | ||
| I truly believe the people that are hiding this believe they're doing so with good intentions, that it's too dangerous potentially for humanity. | ||
| But I believe and come to the conclusion that the good outweighs the bad. | ||
| And whatever happens in the future, it's up to us to make sure that we use this technology responsibly. | ||
| So the reality is the government, US government, who I am fairly certain is responsible for this, and the third party contractors who have been developing this technology need to come out and tell the truth. | ||
| It's past time that we learn the truth and past time that we get past our petty differences, political differences, Just the small squabbles that we have over stuff that doesn't matter and come together and unify using this technology to have it reshape our world and use it responsibly so that we don't destroy ourselves. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. And it's a topic that's been a favorite of so-called conspiracy theorists for a long time because we've known for a while that they have technology they haven't revealed. | ||
| And even the technology that we know they have is really monumental and incredible. | ||
| I mean, there's so many things you mentioned that I do want to get into, and I want to get into the whistleblower. | ||
| We'll save it for tomorrow. We will save that for tomorrow. | ||
| So I want to ask, you know, quantum entanglement is one of these things where it seems to violate, from my very limited understanding, the laws of physics. | ||
| In other words, you can have I mean, yeah. That's the other thing that makes this so hard to wrap my mind around. | ||
| And we have the story here from Reuters. | ||
| Loss of employees on Malaysia flight, a blow, U.S. chipmaker says. | ||
| And this is freescale semiconductors who had 20 employees on there that went missing. | ||
| And I think you mentioned, you know, well, they were going to China. | ||
| Maybe they didn't want to let them get to China. | ||
| But if you're people with this level of technology, do you even care about the mundane concerns of warring states? | ||
| I mean, they've got to be above such petty conflicts, right? | ||
| Yeah, and so first thing I want to say as well, just so I don't forget, is there is a $145,000 bounty from Kim.com, Investigate Earth Podcast, and a wealthy follower who ran for upper office, that they've all donated this money. | ||
| And the intention is that anyone who can find the hoaxer of these videos, if anyone thinks that they're not real, go find the hoaxer, bring us the hard drive full of their source work, and you can get $145,000. | ||
| That's how serious, not just me, The people who've been following this case are about proving that these videos are authentic. | ||
| That's the only way anyone can debunk these videos. | ||
| Now, with respect to the technology, quantum teleportation is real. | ||
| It's actually been proven multiple times over. | ||
| Another scientific concept that people struggle with is time dilation is also real. | ||
| I mean, time is a fluid symmetry. | ||
| Time flows differently depending on where you are in space-time, depending on how much mass you are near. | ||
| It doesn't seem that way because we're all on the same planet experiencing the same time dilation effects. | ||
| These concepts have been proven. | ||
| And the only thing we need to extend it to the level where we can have teleportation, as we see in these videos, is a unification theory of quantum and macro. | ||
| And that's why I've been talking to physicists and engineers. | ||
| That's why they've been reaching out to me. | ||
| Because a lot of these people have reached out saying, these videos can prove my concepts, my science, you know? | ||
| And so that's what can enable all this. | ||
| But like you said, it's almost like breakaway civilization level at this point, right? | ||
| The technology is so advanced that it renders everything else obsolete. | ||
| One hypothetical example of this is that we might be able to just annihilate any nuke or missile that's sent at us. | ||
| It's a perfect defense mechanism. | ||
| I mean, we can teleport it back onto them as well, but we might just be able to completely annihilate and render it just completely moot. | ||
| So this is the reason why this is a trump card. | ||
| You don't want to play this card unless you really have to, which means that the motive here has to be about much more than just money, right? | ||
| It's just this is too risky, although I don't think they ever thought this would leak. | ||
| You know, it really took somebody to make a sacrifice to make this happen. | ||
| And I think that people in the UFO community, that's what they keep talking about. | ||
| Well, we need somebody to come out and just leak it and go to jail. | ||
| Well, that's what happened in this case. | ||
| And tomorrow I can't wait to talk to your audiences about that. | ||
| It is absolutely incredible. | ||
| And just to clarify, because we just saw the video on screen there for our television viewers, that's not a cut. | ||
| That's the plane disappearing. | ||
| The footage continues, but the plane's not there anymore. | ||
| It looks like it could be, you know, like a cut or a, you know, some video artifact, but that's what actually happened to the plane. | ||
| It was there and then it was gone. | ||
| Yeah, the part about it is that this just makes more sense than anything else has happened. | ||
| It seems impossible. I even struggle with it. | ||
| I had ontological shock for weeks, where I even had to go ask my family, am I in some kind of Truman Show situation where you guys are just all planning a prank on me because I can't figure out how this could be happening? | ||
| But as the days have gone by, I've made connections with people I never thought I would that have essentially led me to believe that, yes, this is all real and this technology is being hidden and that certain factions of the government want this stuff to come out. | ||
| Others don't. I mean, I've even wondered, am I being used myself indirectly just to help get it out? | ||
| But the more I look through the evidence here, I think they're still trying to hide this desperately. | ||
| Because the reality is I don't think they think we're prepared for it. | ||
| I think they think this technology is so dangerous that they don't want it out there in the public's hands and that they're doing anything they can to keep it secret. | ||
| So that's why I am imploring your audience to look at this with an open mind. | ||
| There's a lot of people out there that will never be able to believe these videos will be real no matter what, because that means they've been getting lied to by their authorities, lied to by the media that they trust, lied to by the academics they've been getting taught, and that they haven't been getting taught the real science that is out there that's not science fiction, but just science itself. | ||
| It's absolutely incredible. | ||
| And, you know, I think it should be obvious to our audience why they would want to hide something like this. | ||
| After all, they've hidden things like this before. | ||
| I mean, anybody who's looked into Nikola Tesla understands that free energy is completely possible on this planet. | ||
| But you can see from climate change to wars of the Middle East, I mean, control of resources is a very useful leverage to get people to do things they wouldn't otherwise do, like go to war and kill each other. | ||
| For the control system that is really their superlative concern to continue, they have to have resources that they control the flow of. | ||
| And if you present technology that undoes the need for all resources, there goes their power. | ||
| So it seems obvious to me why they would want to hide this. | ||
| I'm blown away by this. | ||
| Obviously, my interest is incredibly piqued. | ||
| I'm sure our audience is as well. | ||
| You can go and find just... | ||
| An overabundance of information on Ashton's Twitter. | ||
| It's at JustXAshton. | ||
| That's at JustXAshton. | ||
| Same name as his YouTube. | ||
| Thank you so much for coming on. | ||
| Thank you for all the work that you've done. | ||
| I'm very excited to hear you again tomorrow on The Alex Jones Show, sir. | ||
| Thank you. Thanks very much. | ||
| Appreciate it, Harrison. Oh boy, I just, I'm absolutely blown away. | ||
| It's not often that we have a guest that leaves me just completely speechless as to what's been uncovered from quantum mechanics to, I'd even say time travel is hinted at this, anti-gravity, endless free energy. | ||
| I mean, this is it, folks. | ||
| This could be a revelation that can shake the world. | ||
| At the foundation. Incredible stuff. | ||
| First came Pac-Man, Donkey Kong, and Super Mario Brothers. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And now, the ultimate retro nostalgia throwback game. | |
| I present to the world, Alex Jones' New World Order Wars. | ||
| They're turning the freaking thugs game! | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll eat your ass! | |
| You Nazi scum! | ||
| Let's free the patriots and defeat the globalist tech games. | ||
| We are going to defeat the globalists very bigly. | ||
| This game is mostly peaceful. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whoo! | |
| Aaaaah! | ||
| Hmm, I'm going to lower the world's population. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Ha-ha-ha! | |
| Oh, Big Bill. | ||
| I'm taking you down, rapist. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I did not have sexual relations with that saxophone. | |
| Download it now at alexjonesgame.com because as we all know, anything badass gets censored! | ||
| We have a product that has been sold out for over a year. | ||
| And it's because it's so hard to make this product. | ||
| Nobody else ever tried to do this. | ||
| Nobody else was ever able to do this, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| And I'm talking about Survival Shield X2. This is deep earth crystal iodine, sold out for over a year. | ||
| You have to get a DEA license to even have it. | ||
| And it's a proprietary patented system to even make it. | ||
| And finally, after a year of trying, One of the top labs in the US was able to make it. | ||
| This is the missing link in our bodies. | ||
| Go do your own research on iodine deficiency. | ||
| Go do your own research on how most types of iodine are bound to the soil or bound to other elements so you don't absorb them. | ||
| This goes right into your bloodstream, right into your body, and what it does for your immune system and your overall stamina and your energy and your libido and just everything is simply insane. | ||
| It's finally back in stock. | ||
| X2 in late November 2023. | ||
| And if InfoWars doesn't continue on in the future, which I hope it does, but if it doesn't, this could be the last run of X2 ever. | ||
| Get it. Keep us on the air. | ||
| But that's a side issue. Experience X2 for yourself. | ||
| Research iodine deficiency and find out that this is the only real atomic iodine. | ||
| Thousands of other companies claim they have it. | ||
| They don't. I would have had this a year ago and put some crap out. | ||
| This is the real deal, the real McCoy, the most powerful supplement, hands down, we've ever put out. | ||
| X2. Pure atomic iodine from InfowarStore.com. | ||
| X2 is back, and it's discounted. | ||
| X2 is back. | ||
| If you've never experienced X2, now's the time. | ||
| If you loved X2, now's the time. | ||
| It funds the operation, but more importantly, it blows you away. |
Export Selection