Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
Harrison Smith presents War Room on InfoWars. | |
Indonesia appeals to the US to do more to stop the atrocities in Gaza. | ||
Yep. | ||
This fire is a must for the sake of humanity. | ||
Once again, thank you for your invitation, President Biden. | ||
Thank you. Thank you. | ||
And as we met outside, as you got out of your automobile, we had a very important discussion on climate. | ||
The president said, I'm cold. | ||
What are the causes of the Gaza ceasefire? | ||
No. No question. | ||
President Biden says there is no possibility of a ceasefire. | ||
And former President Trump has made it clear that he will also serve the Zionist state of Israel. | ||
This is one issue that the entire U.S. government seems to be in agreement on. | ||
But America and its NATO vassals stand alone with Israel. | ||
Millions of people all over the world are taking to the streets in one of the most unified peaceful protests ever. | ||
Most people are seeing this as it is, an illegal occupation sliding quickly towards genocide. | ||
Which is good, because the world is now on the brink of a holy war, and the only way to stop it is a mass awakening. | ||
The US is firing airstrikes in eastern Syria, where the Iraqi militia have been launching drone attacks at US military bases. | ||
The Islamic resistance in Lebanon, Hezbollah, has launched several operations targeting Israeli forces who have been bombing several towns in southern Lebanon. | ||
A Black Hawk helicopter crash killed five U.S. special forces off the coast of Cyprus, and the Turks are claiming it was shot down. | ||
China and Iran are now working together against Israel, and the CCP begins military drills in the South China Sea. | ||
To the majority of the world, it is clear that the Zionist state of Israel is the antagonist. | ||
As Celia Farber points out, even some of Israel's staunchest supporters are now speaking out against their war crimes. | ||
Macron calls on Israel to stop killing women and children. | ||
And Anthony Blinken says that far too many Palestinians have been killed. | ||
Humanity is more awake than ever. | ||
And we are watching as Israel kills a few dozen militants and over 10,000 civilians while calling it a war. | ||
The majority of the world is demanding an end to this slaughter, but Netanyahu says that Israel will defy the world if needed to defeat Hamas, an organization created by Israel. | ||
The region is being surrounded by warships as thousands of Americans march in DC to demand more mass murder of Palestinians. | ||
unidentified
|
The calls for a ceasefire are outrageous. | |
Crowd cheering. | ||
Crowd chanting. | ||
What are the causes of a Gaza ceasefire? | ||
No. No possibility. | ||
Greg Reese reporting. | ||
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
That is the latest masterpiece by Greg Reese. | ||
You can find and share it, of course, at band.video. | ||
I hope that you do share those links. | ||
Glad that you're with us here today for this Wednesday edition of The War Room. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
We have a lot of videos to show you, a lot of news to cover. | ||
All sorts of stuff. Of course, we will get in a little bit to what's happening in Israel with the siege of Al-Shifa Hospital. | ||
You know, the Hamas headquarters, there were like four guns there, you guys. | ||
So it was totally fine to kill all of the babies in the incubators. | ||
It was probably the babies that were using the guns, if I had to guess. | ||
That was probably it. | ||
Yeah, we're going to get into not just what's going on in Gaza, but of course the fallout as perfectly predictable. | ||
In fact, we did predict it. | ||
We, the West, America, and Europe is expected to take in the Gaza refugees. | ||
This is just a nice suggestion from the people that are creating the refugees. | ||
So we'll cover that and so much more. | ||
Stay with us. It's the War Room. | ||
Infowars.com, Infowarsstore.com is where you go to support everything we do here at InfoWars. | ||
unidentified
|
Message after the message. | |
Oh, she died. | ||
I'm a pioneer! | ||
I'm an explorer. | ||
I'm an explorer. I'm a human, and I'm coming! | ||
I'm animated! | ||
I'm alive! My heart's big! | ||
It's got hot blood! Going through it fast! | ||
I like to fight, too! | ||
I like to eat! | ||
I like to have children! | ||
I'm here! I got a life force! | ||
This is a human! This is what we look like! | ||
This is what we act like! | ||
This is what everybody was like before us! | ||
This is what I am! | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a throwback! I'm here! | |
I've got the fire of human liberty! | ||
unidentified
|
I'm setting fires everywhere! | |
And humans are turning on everywhere! | ||
unidentified
|
Get behind me, Satan! | |
Down with the devil! | ||
This can't be! You're playing the wrong message! | ||
Visit infowars.com forward slash show today! | ||
Alright, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, this is TheWarRoomInForWars.com band.video. | ||
We joined the third hour of today's program by Nate Kane. | ||
We have a lot of videos to show you today, and I'm just going to try to see how many of these I can possibly squeeze in. | ||
And, of course, we'll start today off with talking about Israel, but we have the education system to talk about. | ||
We have the We have the descendants of murderers being rewarded by the state, given reparations for the fact that their great-grandfathers murdered a bunch of white people. | ||
So that's fun. | ||
We'll talk about that. | ||
Just a lot of horrible nonsense to discuss today. | ||
Before we get into what has unfolded in Gaza over the last 24 hours... | ||
You saw in the segment by Greg Reese, and of course we were watching yesterday, the massive pro-war protest that went on. | ||
There's got to be a better word for that. | ||
I think at that point it's, I guess it's a rally. | ||
I don't know. What did Hitler have at Nuremberg? | ||
That was a rally, right? Nuremberg rally. | ||
So yeah. Yeah, it was a rally. | ||
It was a pro-war rally. | ||
Like a pep rally before a high school football game. | ||
Get the teams jazzed up to go out there and murder each other. | ||
Fun stuff. And it was huge. | ||
It was a very large showing. | ||
However, if we go to clip number four, Chris Skye breaks down how this might not have been quite the grassroots, mass, populist display. | ||
That it seemed to be. Here's Chris Guy explaining how they got such big numbers out for the pro-war rally. | ||
Let's watch. Here's another video that's gonna really open your eyes and really piss off the Zionists. | ||
Let's see if I can remember all of this. | ||
So we just had the largest pro-Israeli protest ever. | ||
Really? What they didn't tell you is that the Israeli campus coalition Paid every single person $250 to show up to that protest. | ||
That means they spent a million dollars to bring 4,000 for every 4,000 people there. | ||
Now, where do they get the money for this? | ||
Well, the Israeli Campus Coalition gets it from a place called Hillel International. | ||
Hillel International is the largest Jewish organization for universities all over the world. | ||
It gets something like 50 to 100 million dollars a year as its funding source from God knows where. | ||
Mostly our tax dollars, by the way. | ||
Because if you know... | ||
The United States gives Israel billions of dollars a year in our tax dollars. | ||
And in fact, they have to borrow that money and then give it to Israel. | ||
So imagine you taking out a loan and then giving that money that you took the loan out to Israel. | ||
And now you have to pay back that loan, but Israel gets the money. | ||
And now Israel not only does it not pay that loan back, They get to put that money in the bank and actually collect interest on the money that you just gave them while you're paying the interest on the loan because you're a stupid American goyim. | ||
So that Israel takes those billions and billions of tax dollars that you give them and then they give them to organizations like this. | ||
And what is Hillel International? | ||
Who is Hillel? Hillel was a Babylonian, a Babylonian sage who died only 10 years after Christ, and he's one of the top people in Babylon for writing the Talmud and Talmudic teachings, which we know is the root of Zionism, the root of Satanism, and bow worship, and all the rest of it. | ||
So we have these literal satanic organizations getting billions of dollars from Americans and then filtering millions of dollars through their non-profits and then using American taxpayer dollars to pay Jewish Americans to show up to a pro-Israeli protest to try to give the impression to the world that Israel has support. | ||
Isn't that incredible? And you'll find the more you look into things, the more stuff like this you'll discover. | ||
And he explained it pretty well right there, but just to put a little bow on it, they'll | ||
tax you, they'll take your money at gunpoint, right, ostensibly, effectively, take your | ||
money at gunpoint, rob it from you, send it to particular special interests in this country, | ||
who then turn around and use it to bribe and pay for protests for a supposed sign of solidarity | ||
and popular support for more government programs to take more of your money to spend on more | ||
things that don't benefit you in the slightest. | ||
So it becomes this cycle, this reinforcing feedback loop of your tax dollars being taken, | ||
funneled to groups who then use that to demand more tax dollars taken for more of their groups, | ||
who then take that to funnel more, and it just goes on and on and on. | ||
And so we're paying for our own destruction. | ||
We are just the, you know, I've used the example before, but I really think the only image | ||
to accurately describe the American taxpayer right now are those Chinese bears where they | ||
keep them alive to harvest the bile, right? | ||
They actually cut a hole in the bear and then cram something in so it stays open. | ||
So they're just in constant misery and suffering, but you can't let them die. | ||
You got to keep them alive. | ||
So they keep producing bile so you can take it and sell it. | ||
Like, that's us. We're just constantly being extracted from as our Standard of living and way of life and general comfort is just utterly and completely destroyed. | ||
But we're kept barely alive, just alive enough so that we're useful to the people that are relentlessly harvesting our very souls. | ||
It's pretty amazing. And, of course, there's plenty of stories to back up exactly what Chris said. | ||
Israel on Campus Coalition offers a $250 grant for college students to attend Washington, D.C. Israel rally. | ||
Information Liberation has the same story. | ||
Pro-Israel Group paid students $250 each to attend March for Israel event in D.C. G, what wonderful support they have. | ||
Meanwhile, this is clip 5 here. | ||
Chuck Schumer, Mike Johnson, Hakeem Jeffries, and Joni Ernst. | ||
So, leader of the Democratic Senate, leader of the Republican Congress. | ||
They can't come together for border security. | ||
They can't come together for anything that even remotely benefits the American people. | ||
But when it comes to supporting Israel's genocidal campaign of murder in Gaza, they're literally holding hands like they just won a marathon. | ||
It's insulting beyond belief. | ||
And yet it's like they're rubbing it in our face. | ||
Clip number five here. Old Chuckie Schumer and Mike Johnson together holding hands in solidarity in opposition to the vast majority of the American people. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. We stand with Israel! | |
We stand with Israel. | ||
Makes you proud to be an American, doesn't it? | ||
Just one of those iconic moments, you know, where we can all come together and be so proud of our... | ||
I mean, you know, it's one thing if... | ||
You've got people like Chuck Schumer who has an obvious bias in favor of Israel. | ||
He goes up and gives speeches to AIPAC where he's like, my name means guardian of Israel. | ||
God appointed me to guard Israel. | ||
It's like, well, you're a United States senator, so maybe keep it on the down low. | ||
But it's one thing if it's like some understated suggestion that maybe there's some dual loyalty | ||
at play here. | ||
But when they're literally standing in front of a crowd of people waving a foreign country's | ||
flag chanting, we stand with the foreign country, it becomes something else entirely. | ||
It becomes something else entirely. | ||
It becomes an insult. | ||
It becomes a challenge. | ||
It goes from like a sneering look to spitting in our faces. | ||
And I for one am just utterly sick of it. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Let me give you a little hypothetical. | ||
A little mind game we could play here. | ||
Imagine that I got up here day after day and talked about my anti-abortion stance. | ||
Talked about how I thought it was a vile practice. | ||
How I was killing an entire generation of children. | ||
I did everything I could. | ||
Volunteering for pro-life networks. | ||
And just taking a stand, going to events where I'm staunchly against abortion. | ||
But then, I go to a Planned Parenthood fundraiser in a black neighborhood. | ||
And I talk about how actually abortion is a very necessary thing and it needs to be expanded exclusively for black people. | ||
You'd probably look at me a little bit cockeyed, wouldn't you? | ||
You'd probably sit there and go, he's not actually against abortion. | ||
He just is a vile racist. | ||
He just hates black people. | ||
You can understand, if I'm up here going, abortion's terrible, we're killing millions of people, and then I'm out there cutting a ribbon at a Planned Parenthood You know, in Third Ward in Houston, going, finally, the black people of this neighborhood will no longer have such a high birth rate. | ||
We'll get that number down as low as false. | ||
It would really make you question what I was really all about, right? | ||
Well, that's literally exactly what Chuck Schumer does. | ||
Chuck Schumer, as a Democrat, as like the prototypical Democrat, is staunchly pro-abortion here in America. | ||
Give speeches, passionate appeals, passes legislation to expand abortion. | ||
But he also is a member of and has attended, in Israel, events put on by EFRAT, E-F-R-A-T, an anti-abortion operation in Israel, explicitly to keep the Israeli birth rates up. | ||
Just these are the people that run our country. | ||
You think I could get away with something like that? | ||
You think people would just go, well, he's got different beliefs for different groups of people. | ||
I guess that's just how he is. | ||
You have to understand, Chuck Schumer, it's not just that he goes up in front of AIPAC and says that he's the guardian of Israel and that's the purpose of his life as a U.S. senator. | ||
It's that he's actively pushing legislation and policies that are hugely damaging to America that he knows are hugely damaging because he opposes those very same policies in his home state of Israel. | ||
You want to talk about dual loyalty? | ||
Chuck Schumer should be at the top of that list. | ||
And it's infuriating. And I guess it's, you know, war makes strange bedfellows. | ||
Anybody who's been busy telling me I'm on the side of Black Lives Matter because I'm against the wholesale murder and indiscriminate bombing of Palestinian civilians. | ||
Well, you're on the side of Chuck Schumer. | ||
So how's that feel? How do we feel about that? | ||
And weirdly, I apparently am now on the side of the president of Turkey, Recep Erdogan. | ||
He gave a speech. In Turkey, very, well, intense words from Erdogan, president of Turkey. | ||
Let's go now to clip number nine. | ||
Erdogan tells Israel their time is up. | ||
And I'll read along the subtitles for our radio listeners. | ||
Let's go to clip number nine. He says, hey, Israel, you have an atomic bomb, a nuclear bomb, and you are making threats with this. | ||
We know this. And your end is near. | ||
You can have as many nuclear bombs as you want. | ||
You can have whatever you want, but you're on your way out. | ||
Pretty intense stuff. | ||
And of course, that is sort of the primary... | ||
Once you understand that, once you understand the Samson option, it makes a lot of sense why... | ||
The stories we covered yesterday about Israel saying we're going to do it even if we have to go alone. | ||
Because they understand and all the people in power understand that they have and are willing to use atomic bombs against all of their neighbors. | ||
Iran, Lebanon, Palestine, maybe Egypt and also America by the way. | ||
One of the little aspects of Samson option that people don't draw a lot of attention to. | ||
It's not just about bombing their immediate neighbors. | ||
Or Damascus to fulfill some sort of apocalyptic disaster. | ||
They're also aimed at European capitals like Paris. | ||
Israel's atomic bombs. | ||
So they essentially have a gun to the rest of our heads. | ||
But I'm afraid I agree with Erdogan there. | ||
Despite the fact that I've been a pretty outspoken critic of him the last couple years. | ||
Not even saying that I agree with the desire. | ||
Like, I don't want him to be right. | ||
He's just right. | ||
They have lost the plot. | ||
They have gone way too far. | ||
People are not just going to forget about this. | ||
And they are having one hell of a time dealing with the weakest, lowest, smallest enemy on their list. | ||
I mean Hamas is a mouse compared to Iran, compared to Hezbollah, compared to Syria. | ||
I mean And it's been, what, a month and a half? | ||
And they're just now starting to get to the infiltration of Gaza? | ||
And by the way, they're taking massive casualties on all of this. | ||
So again, their only way out of this is to bring America in, which they are doing because they have blackmail a la Jeffrey Epstein on the leaders of America. | ||
And they're spending immense amounts of money trying to overwhelm the popular sentiment on social media that is what Israel's doing is unconscionable, a crime against humanity, wholly illegal, and something that demands justice. | ||
Let's go now to clip number 17. | ||
Here's UN Special Rapporteur explaining that under international law, Israel does not have a right to do what it's doing. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. With your permission, I will clarify what is self-defense under international law so that everyone can understand, well, there is not such a thing that Israel could claim. | |
So, in common language, self-defense might be understood as the right to protect oneself. | ||
But however, Article 51 of the UN Charter that Israel has invoked It's not just the right to protect itself. | ||
It's a self-defense under international law. | ||
It's a legal term of art and means the right to wage a war, which Israel doesn't have. | ||
And this is consolidated jurisprudence of the supreme judicial organ of the United Nations. | ||
And I understand that the state practice might diverge. | ||
United States and Iraq. | ||
But the law remains the law and this is what we should follow. | ||
So the right of self-defense can be invoked when a state is threatened by another state, which is not the case. | ||
Israel has not claimed that that has been threatened by another state. | ||
It's been threatened by an armed group, qualified the way you want, but it's an armed group within the occupied territory. | ||
And frankly, even saying the war between Gaza and Israel is wrong because Gaza is not a standalone entity. | ||
It's part of the occupied territory. | ||
But so, in particular, Israel cannot claim the right of self-defense. | ||
It's an illegal war. It's a brutal occupation. | ||
It has to end. All right. | ||
Welcome back, folks. We do have a lot of political stuff to talk about. | ||
Trump making some awesome and based statements about what's necessary to reclaim our country. | ||
Really infuriating and terrifying the Democrats. | ||
On the mere suggestion that he might do what they are actively already doing. | ||
I know, it's just horrible. | ||
We'll show you some actual funny videos about that. | ||
We're also going to talk about, oh, just some... | ||
Just some progressive science, you know? | ||
Pedophilia, zoophilia, it's all becoming acceptable now because even the worst possible predictions of the most fundamentalist Christians in the 90s fell short of the reality, and that's a horrifying thing to contemplate, and we'll do just that. | ||
But first, let's talk about the latest in Gaza. | ||
Hamas blames U.S. for giving Israel green light to raid Al-Shifa Hospital. | ||
This is the latest. So according to Hamas, U.S. President Joe Biden is wholly responsible for the Israeli assault on Gaza's largest hospital. | ||
The accusation came in a statement on Wednesday, a day after the White House and U.S. intelligence sources corroborated Israel's claims that Hamas has buried an operational center under a hospital. | ||
Now, I don't have to... | ||
Explain to you why Israel has proven themselves to be wholly, completely, utterly untrustworthy throughout this entire affair as just about every major shocking statement from them has been immediately repealed and proven to be false from 40 decapitated babies to mass rapes to just the sheer number of civilians being killed. | ||
It turns out that The latest estimates are 80% of the civilians killed were killed by IDF who opened indiscriminate fire on everybody at the music festival as well as air striking places where they knew hostages were being held killing all of the armed people as well as all of the hostages. | ||
So I don't need to explain really that everything that comes out of Gaza from Israel is Should be looked at a couple times before you just buy it hook, line, and sinker. | ||
But even if they were absolutely correct, even if they are 100% telling the truth, for the first time in the war, their statements are absolutely valid and confirmable. | ||
Just imagine it was in America. | ||
Just imagine it was a hospital here in America that was taken over by terrorists. | ||
How would you expect the authorities to deal with that situation? | ||
Would you expect them to bomb the entire hospital? | ||
Would you expect them to cut off the energy to the hospital? | ||
Would you expect them to, you know, send in armed squads with tanks to bombard the gates | ||
of the hospital and then strip all of the adults, males over the age of 16, completely | ||
naked under the justification of seeing if they had weapons hidden there? | ||
Of course not. So absolute truth here. | ||
There's absolutely no reason. | ||
There's absolutely no justification for the way that Israel themselves have acted. | ||
And that's exactly what they did. | ||
All men 16 years and above, raise your hands how Al Shifa raid unfolded. | ||
This is from The Guardian. Three hours before dawn, witnesses and doctors inside Gaza's largest hospital reported Israeli tanks had entered the sprawling medical compound on the western edge of Gaza City. | ||
We can see them pointing the guns and tanks towards the hospital. | ||
They're inside the complex with tanks. | ||
They announced over a loudspeaker, all men 16 years and above, raise your hands, a soldier shouted in accented Arabic, according to a journalist speaking to AFP. Exit the building towards the courtyard and surrender. | ||
About a thousand Palestinian males, their hands above their heads, were soon led to the vast hospital courtyard, some of them stripped naked by Israeli soldiers, checking them for weapons or explosives, the journalist said. | ||
So they did it. | ||
They saved the day. | ||
And finally, you know, all of this madness can end. | ||
Oh, except that this is just the beginning because their stated obvious advertised goal is the total eradication of the Palestinian race inside Gaza. | ||
And in fact, Israeli politicians are now demanding that the West take in Palestine because that's the way this works, apparently. | ||
It really is incredible. | ||
Israeli military enters Gaza's al-Shifa hospital. | ||
That's a story from Financial Times. | ||
The raid by Israeli troops in the early hours of Wednesday came after they surrounded the besieged strip's largest hospital, which is home to patients and thousands of people who've sought shelter from Israel's bombardment of the coastal enclave. | ||
They call it a precise and targeted operation against Hamas. | ||
And they've released lots of video of supposed weapons caches, which amounts to maybe a dozen weapons. | ||
But they have not produced anything that makes it look like, at all, like it's a Hamas operational command center. | ||
But the reason that they believe that Al-Shifa Hospital had a command center underneath was because, well, the Israelis built one. | ||
Yeah, the Israelis are so sure about the location of the Hamas bunker, not because they're trying to score some propaganda points or because it's been repeatedly mentioned by passing Western reporters, but because they built it. | ||
Back in 1983 when Israel still ruled Gaza, they built a secure underground operating room and tunnel network | ||
beneath Shifa Hospital, which is one among several reasons why Israeli security | ||
sources are so sure that there's a main Hamas command bunker in or around the large cement basement | ||
beneath the area of building two of the hospital, which reporters are obviously prohibited from entering. | ||
So that's nice. I mean, that's the sort of forethought that Israel puts into their operation. | ||
Back in 1983, when they're building a hospital, they put a secure underground network so that when the inevitable conflict between Gaza and Israel erupted, they would have an excuse to attack the hospital because they themselves built the room that they would therefore be targeting. | ||
I want to know, if you're Hamas and you know that Israel built this hospital and you know that Israel built the secure rooms, Are you dumb enough to use the room that Israel built when you have... | ||
All of the technology you could possibly need to build your own tunnels and your own operational rooms? | ||
Would you stick with the Israeli built ones from 1983? | ||
Or would you have spent the 40 intervening years building your own command centers? | ||
In this case, if you claim to not believe Israel, if you don't believe the boy crying wolf, you are actually a Holocaust denier. | ||
That's the claim that the Israeli ambassador, former Israeli ambassador David Friedman makes. | ||
And there's another very funny part where he's like, when was the last time you went to Gaza? | ||
And the guy interviewing him, who's Mark Lamont, I think, is like, 18 months ago, what about you? | ||
unidentified
|
The guy's like, well, several years ago, but that's not the point. | |
It's like, oh, you didn't expect that, did you? | ||
You didn't expect that. | ||
Answer. But, again, we can go through the particulars, all the evidence that they claim to show. | ||
They'll show pictures of elevator shafts and claim it's a tunnel, or they'll show a picture of an electrical box and claim that it's somehow proof that it's a Hamas command center. | ||
But it doesn't matter because they aren't actually targeting Hamas. | ||
They're targeting civilians, and the proof of that is that 99.5% of the deaths have been civilians. | ||
unidentified
|
So, there's that. | |
Alright folks, we had some technical difficulties there and we are currently in the middle of the Infowars version of a Chinese fire drill. | ||
We're switching studios here mid-show. | ||
We had a bit of technical difficulties, but the crew is scrambling behind the scenes to get everything up and running, and we'll continue the show here just as soon as we do. | ||
The crew can let me know whenever we have the videos ready. | ||
I do want to go to clip number 11, because that is a very powerful, a little bit longer of a video, but explaining just the full breakdown of what exactly is really coming down the pipe. | ||
Sorry about this, folks, but again, we are scrambling behind the scenes to get everything up and running, and we'll be back in action momentarily. | ||
I saw people on Twitter saying that we had no audio. | ||
I was worried about that. | ||
I thought maybe it was just my earpiece that had collapsed. | ||
Oh, look, the cameras are up now, too. | ||
Fantastic. All right, and we're going to pretty much finish up with coverage of Israel here. | ||
Really, I wanted to be done with in the last segment, but... | ||
Because of the technical difficulties, I didn't get to show a video I wanted to show. | ||
But while we're here in this liminal mode, this in-between area, I'm going to give you some of the headlines for today. | ||
For one thing, very sad, we tried to prevent it, but alas... | ||
We are not the rulers of our country anymore. | ||
As feared, the FCC has authorized Biden's woke takeover of the Internet. | ||
FCC adopts rules to prevent and eliminate, quote, digital discrimination. | ||
The Federal Communication Commission has adopted final rules to prevent digital discrimination of access to broadband services based on income level, race, ethnicity, color, religion, or national origin. | ||
I want to make it very clear to everybody right now. | ||
There is absolutely nothing stopping anybody from getting access to broadband internet. | ||
Literally nothing. | ||
Okay, just so we're clear. | ||
Just so we have, you know, as a foundation to work off of the fact that everything this | ||
bill is predicated on is utter hogwash. | ||
It's like when they write articles talking about the unbearable whiteness of hiking or | ||
something, where as if there's some sort of racial discrimination that's stopping people | ||
of color from literally going outside. | ||
Like, there's nothing anybody could possibly do to stop you from going on a hike. | ||
There's just nothing. | ||
Like, you can just go on a hike. | ||
Nobody is stopping you. But they have to make it a racial thing. | ||
They have to make it appear as though inequalities or inequities in statistics of a particular population Activity is somehow representative of racism that's keeping the poor non-white people away from things that white people do. | ||
But it's just, you can just go hiking. | ||
You can just get internet. | ||
I mean, it's so utterly ridiculous. | ||
But it's like all this stuff that they do. | ||
I mean, they're talking about implementing digital payment international programs. | ||
I don't know, networks to bring about digital payment because of global warming. | ||
It's like this has nothing to do with global warming. | ||
It's retarded. | ||
It's all retarded. And it's pretty obvious that the reason that none of their excuses comport with what they're doing is because what they're doing is about something completely different. | ||
You see what I'm saying? | ||
Like if I... I mean, I don't even need to explain. | ||
It's just happening. They're just doing this. | ||
They're just lying about everything in order to gain power. | ||
And they've just indoctrinated and really brainwashed people into accepting these claims of inequality or climate change or anti-Semitism or whatever it is that people are so scared of those terms. | ||
They're so scared of those ideas. | ||
That they're actually willing to abandon their most deeply held fundamental beliefs, including basic human rights for white people or for anybody else. | ||
Alright, we have that video. This is good. | ||
Let's start with this video because this, as I pointed out, you know, either yesterday or the day before, I went on a big rant talking about how you have to have the ultimate goal in mind and then work backwards. | ||
Like, once you realize that all of this is about globalism, it's about creating a one-world government, and if you want to take it a step farther, a one-world government whose controllers will live forever because they have or are on the cusp of... | ||
Obtaining immortality technology. | ||
Once you realize that's what it's all pointed towards, you don't have to really get in the weeds about little sociological topics. | ||
You can see the end that they have in mind and you can prevent them from ever getting there. | ||
So this woman breaks it down in a really brilliant and thorough way. | ||
So let's go now to this video. | ||
unidentified
|
The final goal is to eradicate humanity as we know it. | |
Once you understand the final destination, it becomes much easier to look back and identify the psychological conditioning, the biological tampering, the cultural grooming and the educational prepping that we have been subjected to for decades in preparation to making us accept a post-human future. | ||
It takes a lot of physical and psychological abuse to get an intelligent species like ours to agree to its own extinction. | ||
Most, if not all, that has transcended in the last 60 years was designed to get us closer to accepting such a dystopian reality. | ||
Whether you care to accept it or not, we live in a hyper-controlled matrix where our perception of reality is meticulously planned, managed and executed in order to control and steer us in whichever direction they wish. | ||
And the direction is a post-human world. | ||
For this, they first needed to destabilize, dehumanize, and demoralize humanity through every means possible. | ||
The destruction of the nuclear family, children being indoctrinated by the state, abortion, the eradication of God, And spirituality from education, life in megacities and away from nature, toxic food, air and water, social media, replacing real human connection and interaction, engineered financial crisis and taxation, endless wars and massive migration, stress, anxiety, depression, drugs and alcohol, constant fear mongering. | ||
Moral relativism as the new religion. | ||
And I could go on and on about how humanity has been influenced and forced to move away from all the things that give us strength, security, purpose, and meaning. | ||
A weak, immoral, disconnected, ignorant and unhealthy population is an easy target for the next stage. | ||
The creation of an entire generation of androgynous beings. | ||
Masculinity is under attack psychologically, culturally and biologically. | ||
Women are being replaced in sports, entertainment and politics by men pretending to be women. | ||
And children are being indoctrinated at school to think that gender is a choice. | ||
The transgender movement is not a grassroots movement. | ||
It comes from the top. It has nothing to do with people's freedom of expression, sexuality or civil rights. | ||
It's an evil psyop with a clear agenda to get us closer to transhumanism by making us question the most fundamental notion of human identity. | ||
Agenda. If you don't know who you are, if you already identify as a hybrid between a man and a woman, you will be easily convinced to become a hybrid between human and machine. | ||
Gender ideology is the 2 plus 2 equals 5 from George Orwell's 1984 dystopian novel. | ||
It's the final test to see whether we will follow the most absurd party line towards our own extinction. | ||
But two plus two equals four. | ||
And no matter how you choose to dress, call yourself, or change your physique, will not change that. | ||
The sad reality, though, is that in the gaslighting process to get us closer to a post-human future, they have mentally and physically harmed an increasing number of children and young people. | ||
And it's only getting worse. | ||
This must be stopped. | ||
An absolutely incredible speech. | ||
If I can at least bring up that last frame, I can tell you which TikTok account posted that, because I want to give credit to that lady. | ||
I don't know who she is. At Sovereign Human Beings on TikTok posted that video. | ||
I found it on Twitter. I wish I knew who that lady was. | ||
Of course, I'm already married, but she's a firecracker, I'll tell you that. | ||
I wish I could give her credit and get her on the show. | ||
My goodness, she understands it better than 99% of people. | ||
We'll be back on the other side. | ||
the crew continues to scramble behind the scenes like a bunch of mad oompa loompas | ||
just trying to get us on board here I'm sick of this stuff | ||
We have to talk about it because the American people think the reason for inflation is government spending more money. | ||
Simply not true. | ||
According to the latest monthly poll conducted by the Global Strategy Group and North Star Opinion Research, some 61% of respondents said they disapproved of Biden's handling of the economy, while only 36% approved. | ||
80% of fiat money printed in U.S. history was printed under the O'Biden administration. | ||
80% of the currency issued since our founding happened the last three years. | ||
That's a path towards Zimbabwe or Weimar Republic. | ||
Add to that looming catastrophe the emergence of bricks swallowing up half of the world's GDP by 2040. | ||
Well, maybe the U.S. will tighten its belt and continue to innovate with American exceptionalism. | ||
Not so fast. | ||
The idea that That is where the O'Biden treason works its magic, shilling for the new world order. | ||
The affirmative task we have now is to actually create a new world order. | ||
According to Biden's executive order on ensuring responsible development of digital assets signed over a year ago, quote, Meanwhile, the flurry of activity towards global digital neo-feudalism has been working overtime. | ||
On November 8th of this year, the United Nations, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and partners of the Rockefeller Foundation launched a campaign to put the world on the path to digital ID, digital payments, and data sharing rollouts in 50 countries under a digital public infrastructure by 2028. | ||
unidentified
|
DPI starts with the following foundational components. | |
Verifiable digital identification that proves who you are, protects your rights, and opens the door to economic opportunities. | ||
Real-time payments that allow people, government, and businesses to instantaneously send and receive payments. | ||
And trust the data exchange that allows for information and data to flow securely and seamlessly. | ||
Together, these foundational components form an interconnected digital network that can spur countries to build resilient economies and drive impact across all sectors for everyone. | ||
The United Nations Development Program plans to implement digital IDs by the year 2030 globally. | ||
According to Reclaim the Net, the IDs will be mandatory for those that want to participate in society. | ||
unidentified
|
But what does Central Bank of Chicago look like? | |
You see? So they never talk about that because people won't actually like the looks of it. | ||
And the final stage is, you know, it's... | ||
It's small, and it's the size of a grain of rice. | ||
All around the world, central bank digital currencies are either in pilot scheme or executive order stage in the States, or they're floating under the radar. | ||
Every person that I come in contact with in the public, I ask them, do you know what a CBDC is or a central bank digital currency? | ||
And nobody knows. Such a system would give the state full access to the details of all transactions as well as the ability to cut off an individual's money supply with the flick of a digital switch. | ||
A key difference with the CBDC is that the central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that will determine the use of that expression of central bank liability and also we will have the technology to enforce that. | ||
If you're not allowed to go more than five kilometers from your home, your car or your money won't work more than five kilometers from your home. | ||
And those rules can be dictated and controlled at a phenomenally central level. | ||
In times of crisis, the role of governments is more important and more relevant than ever. | ||
This is their god-awful horrible plan based on climate pseudoscience and unrelenting detached elitist hubris fueled by eugenics and luciferian lunacy. | ||
A plan that will lead to a national divorce in the United States, untold global starvation, Massive uprisings and ultimately, after great tribulation, the end of the decrepit elite slave master architects and their inheritors. | ||
Alright, welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, we are back up and running. | ||
Please do go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
After all, it ain't just me up here. | ||
There is a whole host of crew members working behind the scenes like Rabid badgers just plugging things in and switching things and turning things on and off. | ||
I don't even understand what they're doing half the time, and I'd be helpless without them. | ||
And of course, all of us would like to sincerely thank everybody for going to Infowarsstore.com and keeping us on the air, in the fight, and, well, frankly, employed. | ||
Go to Infowarsstore.com right now to keep this incredible operation running. | ||
An operation that when I started a mere seven years ago had one measly studio. | ||
Okay, it was a pretty nice studio. | ||
It was the studio we just left. | ||
But since then, two new state-of-the-art, top-of-the-line studios have been built. | ||
We've continued our domination of the alternative media and indeed media overall and have reset the very language people use to discuss world issues. | ||
We really can't I didn't hear a lot of people talking about taxes or taxes. | ||
I don't know, just whatever Republicans used to talk about. | ||
It was all about anti-globalism. | ||
It was all about nationalism. | ||
It was all about fighting against the anti-human agenda that is so obvious now. | ||
When I started seven years ago, nobody was talking like that. | ||
Trump a little bit. Trump got a few of the talking points in. | ||
Right? Globalism, or nationalism, not globalism, will be our credo. | ||
He dropped things like that in speeches. | ||
But that in itself was an effect of Alex Jones paving the way for a populist figure like Donald Trump. | ||
So the impact we've had has been world-shaking, and we will continue to have that impact as we continue to drive relentlessly towards the truth and towards preventing these Utter, unrepentant psychopaths from trying to take control of every aspect of our existence, which all starts with the control of information. | ||
And that's what this FCC decision is all about, and I'm glad we played that last video and the first five. | ||
That video by John Bowne talking about CBDCs because they're all tied in together, whether it's the CBDCs or the DPI, the digital public infrastructure that's required for the CBDCs to operate, or the control of the actual physical broadband infrastructure so they can cut off any body or any website or anything at all that they don't want to get out. | ||
I mean, they've been driving towards this forever today. | ||
May have been a nail in the coffin. | ||
The rules that have been adopted, they won't go into effect for another 60 days, but they have been adopted in opposition or despite of outspoken opposition from FCC commissioners. | ||
So let's go quickly to clip number 12. | ||
Here's the IMF head, Kristalina Georgieva. | ||
I don't know, some international banking demon saying that global CBDC platforms will be mandatory for everyone because she gets to decide, because she elected herself. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's watch. That if we are to be successful, CBDCs could not be fragmented national propositions. | |
To have transactions more efficient and fairer, we need systems that connect In other words, we need interoperability. | ||
And for this reason at the IMF, we are working hard on the concept of a global CBDC platform to trade and to manage risks. | ||
And my colleague Tobias Adrian will talk more about it later. | ||
So again, there's a head of the IMF. Talking about the need for a global CBDC because you can't just have countries implementing their own. | ||
That's crazy. | ||
That's crazy talk. | ||
No, it has to be one centralized payment platform where they control your finances from the transaction level | ||
from a centralized place and they can cut you off for whatever. | ||
And we've seen all of the videos and you just saw some there in that first five minutes | ||
of bankers who were pretty honest about this. | ||
They're like, yeah, we'll be able to stop you from buying anything. | ||
We'll be able to surveil and therefore approve of everything that you do with money. | ||
And there will be no existence of money outside of our system. | ||
You know, kind of like the mark of the beast, kind of like the antichrist into the world | ||
mark of the beast control system, kind of like that, I guess. | ||
Now, part of this is the FCC rule change that has just gone into place from Kyle Becker. | ||
I believe he's quoting the FCC here. | ||
The rules focus on a very real problem of outcome. | ||
Okay, so all this is predicated on discrimination amongst broadband internet providers. | ||
Now I'll tell you, probably the most popular up-and-coming internet broadband provider is Google, And no matter what I try to do, I cannot escape Google ads that are, for lack of a better term, extremely diverse. | ||
I'm sitting there watching, you know, 1940s Superman cartoons with my son, and suddenly there's some grotesque, demon-looking abomination of a human being going, I'm a drag queen and a hypnotist, and I love Google Fiber. | ||
Literally. Have y'all seen this? | ||
A drag queen hypnotist black person is who they're trying to sell Google Fiber to you with. | ||
So the idea that these companies are in any way discriminatory against any protected minority group is laughably absurd, totally non-existent. | ||
I mean, other than, like, the physical infrastructure, which they have to prioritize, because you can't roll it out to everybody all at once, so you prioritize neighborhoods that, you know, can afford it. | ||
That's, I guess, the excuse they're using to bring about what is, in effect, a total top-down control apparatus over the internet infrastructure itself, okay? | ||
So they say, the new rules establish a framework to facilitate equal access to broadband internet services by preventing digital discrimination of access. | ||
Has anybody ever had trouble buying a cell phone? | ||
Has anybody ever had trouble? | ||
I mean, you don't need the physical infrastructure of fiber on the ground to get access to the internet through a phone. | ||
It's all wireless. | ||
So where would the discrimination even take place? | ||
I mean, this makes no sense whatsoever. | ||
It's like saying that people are discriminated against breathing air. | ||
It's like nobody can stop you from breathing. | ||
What are you talking about? Just you go buy the phone. | ||
You go sign up for the broadband and you get it. | ||
Yeah, this is the commercial that always pops up. | ||
Yeah, drag queen and hypnotist. | ||
unidentified
|
Kiki. You know, I didn't like Google Fiber before, but then I saw Kiki, the drag queen hypnotist, was motioning at me seductively, and so now I have Google Fiber. | |
It's great. Disgusting! | ||
It's all disgusting. The rules focus on the very real problem of outcome, such as when decisions untainted by discriminatory intent nevertheless cause different communities to receive different access to broadband services. | ||
And doesn't that quote really encapsulate it all? | ||
They're going for equality of outcome, and if the outcome is unequal in any way, they will assume and impose the assumption of equality. | ||
Discrimination, and they'll actually punish the people who are responsible for it. | ||
They say, even when decisions are untainted by discriminatory intent, but nevertheless cause different communities to receive different access. | ||
So they don't have to prove that you're discriminating. | ||
They just have to prove that, I don't know, black people sign up to Google Fiber at a lower rate than white people. | ||
And they assume, they say, therefore that is discrimination and the American government will come in and fix the problem as if it's even a problem. | ||
Which obviously it's not. Now we covered this last week when a red alert was put out by one of the FCC commissioners themselves. | ||
FCC commissioner calls Biden equity plan for internet control sweeping, unprecedented and unlawful. | ||
Lyndon Carr, federal communications commissioner, said, quote, President Biden's plans hand the administrative state effective control of all Internet services and infrastructure in the country. | ||
Never before in the roughly 40 year history of the public Internet has the FCC or | ||
any federal agency for that matter, claim this degree of control over it. | ||
Indeed, President Biden's plan calls for the FCC to apply a far reaching set of | ||
government controls that the agency has not applied to any technology in | ||
the modern era, including Title II common carriers. | ||
He's on to say for the first time ever, those rules would give the federal | ||
government a roving mandate to micromanage nearly every aspect of how | ||
the Internet functions, from how Internet service providers allocate capital to | ||
where they build, to the services that consumers can purchase, from the profits | ||
of ISPs can realize, how they market and advertise services, to the discounts and | ||
promotions that consumers can receive. | ||
Talk about central planning. | ||
So that passed today. | ||
That passed today in opposition to the... | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, fighting legal battles is not fun and it's not cheap. | ||
Trust me, we know all about that here at Infowars. | ||
And now, unfortunately, I have become a big political target of the New World Order and of the Democrat Party and of the mainstream media. | ||
Now I'm just one in a group of many that they are targeting, but boy oh boy are they coming after me now, and so I need your financial assistance at defendowen.com. | ||
I'm going to have to have lawyers working on this case all the time, unfortunately. | ||
It's not going to be cheap, it's not going to be fun, but you can ease some of the stress, | ||
ease some of the financial burden by going to DefendOwen.com if you're able to financially | ||
support. | ||
Of course, your words of support mean everything, your prayers are paramount, but DefendOwen.com | ||
for financial support so that I can be sure that I have the best legal team for this defense, | ||
which is going to be key for free speech and for the truth and to keep me on air. | ||
Thank you for going to DefendOwen.com. | ||
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Obviously, you know, we just described it there, not only the way that control of the internet, control of the banking systems are being implemented from central power sources in order to, well, get absolute and total veto power over your ability to exist, right? | ||
Can't buy food if the bank doesn't like your opinion, and that's the world we're headed towards, and how all of it is predicated on the Laughable excuse of inequality, of discrimination, or global warming, or whatever. | ||
I mean, whatever they have to say to get you to agree, they'll say it. | ||
They don't care. It has nothing to do with that. | ||
And it's just, you know... | ||
It's just the classical criminal lie. | ||
Like in Clockwork Orange, when they go to abuse and assault the writer and his wife... | ||
They don't go knock on the door and say, hey, we're here to abuse your wife because then the door wouldn't get opened. | ||
They say, oh, we had a car crash. | ||
We need help. Please, can you help it? | ||
There's no car. There's no crash. | ||
They were fine, right? It's just a lie they need to use to get in. | ||
And if they have to appeal for sympathy, then they'll say it's a car crash. | ||
If they have to appeal for something else, you know, they'll say diversity. | ||
They'll say global warming. It doesn't matter because the point is they want to get inside to assault you. | ||
And that's the ultimate goal, but they can't say that. | ||
So their ultimate goal is globalism. | ||
It is a centralized, unelected global government who exerts absolute, total control over every aspect of your existence and By having veto power over your ability to purchase anything. | ||
And that's what it's all about. | ||
But there's another aspect to this constant... | ||
Influx of claims of discrimination, of looking at disparate outcomes, claiming that because the outcomes are different, that's therefore discrimination and therefore we're allowed to basically do anything to prevent this outcome because we've seen the way that that has led to To not just a massive increase in crime rates across the entire nation with Black Lives Matter essentially predicated entirely on this phenomenon, right? Got higher crime rates in the black community. | ||
So you have higher arrests in the black community. | ||
So they look at the disparate outcomes of arrest numbers and they say, wow, black people are being arrested more. | ||
They must be discriminated against. | ||
I guess we better get rid of cops. | ||
That's what they do, literally. | ||
And I guess we better not have cash bail anymore. | ||
And so, you know, tens of thousands of people have paid for this illusion with their lives. | ||
And they don't care, and they're going to keep doing it. | ||
And, of course, nothing actually gets better. | ||
They don't actually fix the disparate outcomes. | ||
The disparate outcomes are still there. | ||
It's just everything's worse for everybody now and this happens over and over and over and over and over and over | ||
and over and over Again, so one of the ways that we've seen this manifest is | ||
in the education system And the fact that non-white and non-Asian races of people typically on average statistically have a worse outcome for behavior in schools, they've decided that any attempt to impose any order or any behavior whatsoever is racist and is not to be allowed. | ||
And of course, the people paying for this are not just the students themselves who are not receiving good education anymore, but the society as a whole, as entire school districts are allowing children to graduate with diplomas despite not being able to read or do math, like in places like Baltimore. | ||
But mostly and primarily and most depressingly, the teachers who have to deal with this and who are expected to go in and do their jobs when they're unsupported by the administration, unsupported by the government, unsupported by law enforcement, unsupported by the media, and not even supported by the parents of the students who should have their children's best interests in mind, but instead are looking for whatever excuse they have to | ||
act aggrieved and claim discrimination and get attention to themselves. Let's | ||
go now to clip number two. Here's a teacher with 25 years of experience | ||
explaining what teaching is like now at the Washington Technology Magnet | ||
School in Liberal St. Paul, Minnesota. And I want to remind you, a | ||
magnet school means that you have to actually test and, you know, get access to this | ||
school. At least that's the way it works in Texas. A magnet school isn't open for | ||
everybody. You have to like qualify for it. So this isn't the lowest of the low, | ||
you know, some out-of- the-way school and some terrible. This is a magnet school, | ||
which means it should be, at least theoretically, held to a higher standard than your | ||
average public school. | ||
But here's what it's like teaching there, clip number two. | ||
He details his own disturbing experiences in a letter sent to staff in September with a subject line of Stop the Madness. | ||
unidentified
|
Fridays and breaks can never come soon enough for me this year. | |
I've always been able to make it to MEA without needing time off to recover, but not this year. | ||
This year, I feel like I've been run over by a train every day I leave. | ||
This week, I politely asked a student that wasn't supposed to be in my room to go to her class. | ||
This was four minutes after the bell had rung. | ||
Her response? Quit talking to me. | ||
Get out of my space. I was three to four feet away. | ||
I then calmly repeated that she needed to leave, and she responded with, Shut the f*** up, you f***hole. | ||
When these kids are in the classroom doing whatever they want swearing at teachers, threatening teachers, Nobody's learning. | ||
Ringaman has worked at the school for the last five years, but he says it's never been this bad, as some teachers are forced into daily confrontations, whether students are in class or not. | ||
unidentified
|
First of all, there are 8 to 15 kids that are in the halls all day. | |
This happened last year. Certain kids never went to class the whole year. | ||
Ringaman blames policy changes years ago by the St. | ||
Paul School District that he says allows students who act out due process. | ||
unidentified
|
You mean to tell me if a co-worker of yours threatened to kick your ass, that they would be allowed to work the rest of the day until the investigation process played out? | |
And she's like, no. I said, then, why are you doing that with students? | ||
Like, are you telling me that you don't trust me as a teacher, that a student actually said, I want to beat you up or I want to kick your ass? | ||
It's just yet another problem, just like the border, just like literally everything, where the solution is not difficult. | ||
It's not impossible to determine. | ||
It's not some major sacrifice. | ||
It's literally just punishing the kids. | ||
It's literally just having the bare minimum of discipline in schools. | ||
It's... Just so obvious, so easy. | ||
I mean, you see all of these things implemented. | ||
We saw it. I mean, this is why the Parkland shooting happened, right? | ||
It's because a bunch of black and Hispanic kids were getting arrested for being criminals. | ||
And so they passed a law that said, we're not going to arrest or charge minors in this situation. | ||
You know, school district anymore. | ||
And so activity that the Parkland shooter was exhibiting that would have previously been noticed and been, you know, confronted with some sort of legal outbreak went totally ignored until it got so bad that he shot everybody up. | ||
So it's not a mystery as to how this came about. | ||
It came about because of the programs that are being implemented by leftist liberals, progressives, who see the disparate outcomes as evidence of discrimination, try to fight that discrimination and in turn just remove any discipline whatsoever. | ||
And on top of that, it is obviously the responsibility of the parents who refuse to take any interest whatsoever in the life of their kids, don't actually care if their kids do well in school or not, which is sort of a mindset that I can't even begin to grapple with because it's so just despicable on its face. | ||
And again, if you have family members that are teachers or anything, I mean, this type of activity starts in elementary school. | ||
It starts in elementary school where you have kids that are acting up and the parents come in and yell at the teachers and take the kids' side and tell the kids, you're being discriminated and you're being, you know, they just don't like you because you're black and you keep doing whatever you want to do. | ||
And they're being taught to behave this way because the society is rewarding them for behaving this way. | ||
Why wouldn't they? Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
Let's talk a little bit more about the education system, shall we? | ||
Because we just showed a video of one teacher and talking about his particular experience over the last couple years as he's seen the obvious and, in many ways, designed collapse of discipline itself. | ||
And he's clearly far from the only one. | ||
And like I said, if you have family members that are school teachers, it doesn't matter | ||
if they're in high school or preschool or elementary school, if it's a high level, you | ||
know, elite school or the lowest of the public schools, it is ubiquitous because it's this | ||
mind cancer that has infected America that completely deprives individuals of sovereignty | ||
and says that they're not responsible for their behavior. | ||
It's society's fault that they're behaving the way that they are. | ||
So it's unfair to punish the individual for something that society made him into. | ||
And that's the mindset that they're in. | ||
And it's a suicidally stupid mindset that is both demeaning to the person it supposedly | ||
serves, right? | ||
The criminal that's told, oh, you, you aren't actually a human though. | ||
It's not fair to punish a dog for eating food on the ground. | ||
That's just what they do. | ||
It's in their nature. You're just like a criminal, and that's just your nature. | ||
And for us to try to impose our rules on you is unfair, I guess. | ||
Which, to me, it's like... | ||
You're a human being. You should be held to the same level as every other human being. | ||
And if you're not held to the same level as every other human being, then you're not really a human being. | ||
You shouldn't qualify for being treated in any way like a normal human being. | ||
If you're not responsible and conscious enough to be able to control your own actions and choose whether to commit a crime or not, you should probably be in a mental ward somewhere. | ||
Or just like, I don't know. | ||
Tied up in chains, like you're not responsible enough to be able to make decisions. | ||
So I guess we have to make decisions for you, but somehow we tell people they're not allowed to make decisions and then allow them to make decisions and then not hold them to account for the outcome of the decisions that they make as conscious adults. | ||
It's despicable. And here is again how this is being carried out and manifested in our education system. | ||
This was posted on Reddit, on rteachers, by a throwaway account. | ||
Confession, teaching at a Title I school with a progressive administration has made me less liberal. | ||
My god a liberal with the ability to change Tell the news wires and it's making me sad how callous I've | ||
become and this is why I want to talk about this one in particular because you got to get over this folks you got | ||
to get over the This idea that has been inculcated in your mind by people | ||
who despise you that somehow you're a bad person For just wanting to be safe or to do your job or to not be | ||
a victim of some rabid criminal | ||
You're not a bad person for wanting law and order. | ||
You might be a weak moron for falling for their lies, but the lie is that you're a bad person. | ||
Stop falling for it. She says, at the beginning of my career, I swallowed all the social justice, restorative discipline, no grade below 50, build relationship stuff, hook, line, and sinker. | ||
Now, in year 10, I feel like a bitter shell of myself who no longer believes in any of this. | ||
Well good, because it's all lies. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a bitter shell of myself. | |
No, it's just you believed a utopian vision of nonsense. | ||
You're not a shell of your former self. | ||
Your former self was a gullible, dumb idiot, and you're above that now. | ||
The main drivers of this, one, horrendous student behavior directly proportionate to bad parenting. | ||
That admin's excuse is, it's just trauma. | ||
We can't discipline for that while students run into zero consequences until they get arrested at age 17 for felonies. | ||
Because it's the same thing that happens over and over. | ||
Number two, continuing lowering of the bar of rigor until it's basically in the toilet, all in the name of equity. | ||
While kids who are trying to go to college can't find rigorous courses to take, and the few that do exist, everyone is allowed in because equity, so tons of kids just F around. | ||
Three, prioritizing the needs of three to four disruptive students over the needs of the other 30, trying to learn until even those 30 give up. | ||
And see that, number three in particular, is like, This is how you should be thinking of it. | ||
These people want to be endlessly empathetic and sympathetic and feeling and loving towards the three to four selfish little scumbags that are ruining it for everybody else. | ||
Why don't you prioritize everybody else that's not screwing everything up, that's not being a disruptive little piece of crap, and you don't have to feel bad about it because you're actually helping the majority of the good kids And yeah, you have to be a little bit mean to the kids that are just viciously mean to everybody else. | ||
Sorry, you have to do that. | ||
And then everything's fine. But this is it. | ||
It's like they are willing to let 30 well-behaved kids suffer and be failed and have their whole future screwed up because they can't bring themselves to actually just have a modicum of standards for three to four kids that just refuse to behave. | ||
It's not that you're callous for understanding what the correct priority is here. | ||
It just means you're a thinking person. | ||
Number four, this one is tricky, but browbeating some teachers into accepting unprofessional, | ||
uncollegial behavior from other teachers because the admin is afraid of being called racist. | ||
Yes, folks, the invention of identity politics has been the most destructive force ever in American | ||
politics. | ||
Or American life. | ||
I mean, forget politics. This is like a random teacher. | ||
Who will be abused and belittled, and even if they try to maintain some level of discipline, some other teacher will come in and accuse them of being racist, and they're so scared of being called racist, and the admin's so scared of being called racist because they know that the NAACP and the ACLU and everybody will come down on there. | ||
I mean, they'll have... Literally million dollar organizations with thousands of activists on the payroll descend on their program and destroy their job or ruin their reputation or destroy their lives because we have allowed this cancer to fester in our country to such an extent that every normal person is perfectly aware of the rules that are set by these despicable private scumbags. | ||
Number five, seeing long-term effects of lowering expectations, quote, grace, and accepting the bare minimum from students and families and the culture that fosters of entitlement, customer service, rather than a true relationship between parents and teachers. | ||
Six, being held hostage emotionally by kids who say that's racist. | ||
Anytime they're asked to do anything other than sit on TikTok, an admin is forced to take it seriously because they're scared not to. | ||
Cowardly, fearful people. | ||
Liberal, stupid people is really just like, that's the cancer. | ||
You want to identify a cancer that America has, the liberalism has metastasized And it's like sugar feeds cancer. | ||
Fear and cowardice feeds this cancer of liberalism that is destroying piece by piece all of the organs of the body politic. | ||
She says, she continues, it's truly unreal to experience all of this and then to hear | ||
white SJWs scream about how unfair the world is for kids of color and it's all the fault | ||
of whiteness. | ||
I'm sorry, but what? | ||
I get blank on by kids all day and it's my fault? | ||
I hate what this has done to me. | ||
I feel like I'm a Fox News a-hole. | ||
I feel like I'm like a Fox News person now. | ||
Do you ever start to think about what you're even saying, like how you're even playing into this exact psyop by saying things like that? | ||
That maybe the people on Fox News aren't just callous, miserable, bad, evil people that just hate minorities, that maybe... | ||
The things that we talk about on Infowars or that they sometimes touch their toes in on Fox News is because we actually want the best outcome for everybody, that we actually care about having a country with a functional education system, and that we see the things, the poisons, the cancers that are tearing it apart, and we want to oppose it for the sake of everybody, not motivated by some senseless desire to do evil. | ||
But she's still in that mindset. | ||
He, she, whoever this... | ||
Is still stuck in this liberal paradigm mindset that by noticing reality and that by actually confronting the, to them, uncomfortable truth about what's going on, they're somehow Fox News a-holes. | ||
It's like they can't bring themselves to be like, oh, those people aren't a-holes. | ||
They're right. Oh, those people aren't just racist, hateful idiots. | ||
I've experienced what they're talking about and I realize they write the entire time. | ||
No, you still think they're a-holes because you're still stuck in the mindset because you're still part of the cancerous problem. | ||
Alright, welcome back. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll be joined in the third hour by Nate Kane. | ||
We'll be talking about some of the persecution against patriots that's taking place and the way that the military and FBI and law enforcement around the country is being purged of its aware, awake citizens. | ||
Yeah, Biden is also in a high-stakes summit with Xi Jinping, which is great. | ||
You know, when you've got the president going toe-to-toe with world leaders, we can all rest easy knowing it's in the capable hands of Joe the beached whale Biden. | ||
That's just pathetic. | ||
And we can talk about some of that, too. | ||
But I really want to talk about this because it's one of my favorite topics. | ||
History. Now, this article... | ||
It's gone pretty viral, been posted around a lot. | ||
The article itself is utterly without merit, completely vapid. | ||
It says nothing, actually. | ||
If you read the whole thing, it has no conclusion. | ||
It comes to no transcendental truth. | ||
He's just sort of rambling, and it's dumb. | ||
But it illustrates and highlights a very particular pattern of liberal thought. | ||
And that is that you take normal, obvious truths and you pathologize them. | ||
You pathologize the recognition of reality as if it is some sort of bias or some sort of thinly veiled prejudice. | ||
And the title of this article says it all. | ||
Why we're still in love with the idea that great men shape history. | ||
Why we're still in love with the idea that great men shape history. | ||
It's like writing why we're in love with the idea that the sky is blue. | ||
Nobody's in love with the idea that the sky is blue. | ||
Nobody thinks the sky is blue because they have some prejudice that makes them want to believe that. | ||
It just is. And if you look at history, history just is the story of great men shape Doing amazing things. | ||
That's what it is. | ||
Sorry, don't know what else to tell you, but this is the point, right? | ||
This is the pathologizing of reality. | ||
Where they want to take something that you just notice as a totally unbiased, totally open-minded individual, and they want to make you think that it's some sort of problem with you that you've noticed this. | ||
So they can change your mind because they don't want you thinking that great men can change history. | ||
They want you thinking that you're powerless and helpless and that it doesn't matter who's in charge or who's taking risks, that everybody is just a dislocated, atomized, thoughtless, you know, fish caught up in the undertow, caught up in the Currents that are just washing you one way or another without anybody's input. | ||
That's not the truth though. | ||
The truth is that great individuals of history determine the course of humanity often for centuries after they're gone. | ||
That's just reality. | ||
Again, part of this is because most of the great men in history are white men. | ||
That's a problem to them and they don't want people to Thinking that, just knowing that, they want to disguise that fact. | ||
They want to act like it's some sort of aberration that has no rhyme or reason behind it. | ||
And also, it's mostly men, although not entirely. | ||
Go look at what Catherine de' Medici did to France. | ||
She was a Medici married to the king of France and changed France forever. | ||
The reason why there's such a thing as French cuisine is because she brought a bunch of Italian recipes and made them popular. | ||
She was a great woman that changed the course of humanity. | ||
Queen Elizabeth. Catherine the Great in Russia. | ||
It's not about men or women. | ||
It's about great people. And most of the time it's men. | ||
And that's a problem for people who themselves have a preconceived bias. | ||
Who themselves have a prejudice not based on reality but based on a fantasy that they want to warp and shape reality to fit into despite the fact that they're shoving a round peg in a square hole. | ||
Let's read some of the Just vapid nonsense that this article tries to pass off his intellect. | ||
He says Napoleon became an exemplar of the great man theory, a concept much in vogue during the 19th century, which saw history as largely shaped by powerful individuals. | ||
Yeah, well, it is. | ||
It is. So, you know, it was also in vogue to think that the sky is blue or the water is wet. | ||
Does that mean it's wrong? | ||
No. It's in vogue because it's correct, actually. | ||
That's the way it works. In the early 20th century, however, Sigmund Freud came along to tell us that actually the reason why we tend to look to powerful personalities that alter the course of history single-handedly, like Julius Caesar or Augustus or any of the emperors really. | ||
I mean, and it's not always a good thing, right? | ||
Actually, a lot of times it's a bad thing. | ||
A great quote that's, you know, the great men of history are very rarely good men. | ||
Genghis Khan was a great man of history. | ||
Genghis Khan changed the rotation of the earth. | ||
He killed so many people. He lowered the temperature of the earth. | ||
He murdered so many people. | ||
He changed the DNA of like a quarter of the planet. | ||
He bedded so many women. | ||
Not a good thing, but in a historical context, a great thing, right? | ||
Alexander the Great. You have any idea? | ||
The course of history, and sometimes, you know, with Alexander the Great, it was like a once-in-a-lifetime, once-in-a-millennia, once-ever sort of thing where he took this small Greek city-state, essentially, of Macedonia and conquered all of the Middle East, all the way to India. Made Greek the lingua franca that facilitated trade. | ||
I mean, it's impossible to describe the number of cities that are massively important world global centers of trade and influence now that he founded. | ||
They're called Alexandria because he was the one that created it. | ||
Or you can have Singular instances where somebody does one thing that changes the course of the whole world. | ||
Givrello Precept and the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, for example. | ||
Or bad things like Caligula spending the entire savings of the Roman government on a two-day party so he could ride his horse across a bay to fulfill a prophecy. | ||
And so what's the point of all this? | ||
The point of all of this is that there's a concerted effort right now to disabuse people of the idea, the factual idea, that great men shape history. | ||
Because they don't want you aspiring to that greatness. | ||
And they don't want you to think that you can have any effect by supporting great men and helping them to achieve their greatness. | ||
Because obviously Napoleon didn't do everything by himself. | ||
He had legions around him that looked to him as a commander and a leader. | ||
But Sigmund Freud wants to pathologize this. | ||
In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud went further in turning Carlyle's idea on its head by identifying the widespread human need to seek out a strong man as savior. | ||
For Freud, the great man was an expression of a mass longing for a father figure. | ||
It's just, no. | ||
What are you talking about? | ||
They make this argument as if this, well, that's what Freud said. | ||
It's like, well, I guess Freud's dumb then. | ||
I guess that sort of is a mark against Freud because that's a stupid thing to say. | ||
It's a stupid way to pathologize just noticing reality and seeing it for what it is. | ||
Today, we may dislike the great man theory of history because it belittles a whole range of other factors. | ||
It also carries the insulting implication that women cannot be great leaders, despite them being much less susceptible to the narcissistic narratives so favored by male dictators. | ||
They hate men. | ||
They hate powerful men. | ||
These are weak, pathetic, simpering men that are uncomfortable with the idea of men who are powerful and influential and have a will to change the world forever. | ||
That makes them very uncomfortable, so they want to impose their discomfort, their weakness and sadness and cowardice on the rest of us who are just recognizing reality for what it is. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, the narcissism from most male dictators. | |
It's like, okay, great. | ||
Yeah, women a lot less narcissistic than men, that's for sure. | ||
Women care a lot less about their, you know, reputations than men do. | ||
I mean, this is just all utter, complete, ridiculous nonsense. | ||
In addition, the great man theory is probably more applicable to previous centuries than in recent times. | ||
This is partly because in a globalized world, national sovereignty has been reduced, both economically and politically. | ||
And see, to these people, that's a good thing. | ||
It's a good thing. | ||
They don't want individuals who can chart a course of history. | ||
They don't want powerful people standing up to the hidden forces that are directing the course of the globe. | ||
They want you to think that you're powerless and hopeless and afloat in the... | ||
Barely understandable undercurrents of history that everything's just happening randomly and nobody can determine where it goes. | ||
So just don't vote for Trump. | ||
That's evil. Don't vote for Trump. | ||
He's not a great man. That's evil and bad. | ||
And you can see where a lot of this pathology comes from. | ||
Oh, by the way, Netflix has selected Denzel Washington to play Hannibal in a new film about Rome. | ||
Because it's not really about hating great men. | ||
It's wanting to recast great men so the great men in history are no longer recognizable as European and white. | ||
We'll be right back. Alright, welcome back folks. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. | |
I got too excited. | ||
Yes, this is the War Room. Yes, I am Harrison Smith. | ||
Yes, we are in the third hour and yes, we will be welcoming Nate Kane in this hour to talk about the... | ||
Well, in a way, to talk about an interesting topic when it comes to the topic I'm about to discuss, because what we're going to discuss with Nate Kane is the way that the Biden administration is actively purging the ranks of the military and the FBI of patriotic people and Christians that they're using the Department of Justice to go after political opponents and all these other various things that if they were told to you as a possibility under Trump, they would have fainted with fright. | ||
Oh, dear. I could never imagine Living under such despotism, dear me. | ||
But when they're doing it, then it's good and valid and to oppose it means you're a fascist. | ||
It makes no sense. | ||
But we'll talk about the reality of what's going on with Nate Kane. | ||
But the left is very concerned that Trump might do something like they're doing. | ||
Oh my gosh, it's very disturbing. | ||
From Insider Paper, Donald Trump plotting raids, mass deportation, giant detention camps for undocumented immigrants... | ||
Former President Donald Trump is reportedly planning a robust immigration crackdown if he secures a second term in the coming year. | ||
This strategy involves the systemic rounding up of undocumented immigrants who would then be held in large detention camps until their expulsion from the country in an undisclosed report. | ||
Oh my gosh. | ||
And they say it goes beyond addressing the nearly 4 million immigrants who have crossed the U.S. border since President Biden assumed office in 2021. | ||
That would be 10 million. | ||
10 million illegal immigrants actually have crossed. | ||
And of course, that's in addition to the 40, 50 million plus that have been here for a long time. | ||
The potential immigration crackdown by the 77-year-old former commander-in-chief would involve deputizing local police and National Guard troops from Republican-run states. | ||
These forces would collaborate with the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers to assist in the apprehension of undocumented individuals, according to a report. | ||
Well, good. Good. | ||
That's exactly what needs to happen. | ||
So, wonderful. | ||
But this is very scary to the leftists. | ||
Who claim this is extreme, racist, and cruel, and that it's meant to stoke fear and divide us. | ||
He's trying to divide us. | ||
Divide who? American citizens from non-American citizens? | ||
That division already exists and should be more important than it is now. | ||
But regardless, they're very concerned about the moves domestically that Trump will be making. | ||
Axios has this story from yesterday. | ||
Why Trump's a vermin speech has alarmed Democrats and historians. | ||
Oh, they're so concerned. | ||
Of course, they're doing all the things he talks about, but they're not concerned about that. | ||
They're concerned about his rhetoric. | ||
Foreign President's new description of his political enemies as a vermin and his vow to root out what he called the threat from within has drawn outrage from Democrats, warnings from historians, and silence from Republicans. | ||
Really? Because it should be met with raucous applause from Republicans, who should all recognize at this point that we do have a threat from within, that these people are despicable cockroach-like vermin, and they have to be rooted out for the sake of the survival of our country and our sacred human rights. | ||
Let's go now to clip number six. Here's Damon Imani making this point in a way that only he can. | ||
Let's watch. It's not a reach. | ||
It's exactly the thing that Adolf Hitler said. | ||
He used the term vermin. | ||
So that's a statement of fact. | ||
And it's just playbook 101, right, for a dictator and authoritarian to dehumanize your opponents so that you can do things to them that then seem, at least to your supporters, fair and just in some way because they're not humanized. | ||
unidentified
|
William, the entire fake-stream media, such as yourself, compared Trump to Hitler from the day he took office, and still do. | |
Yet he didn't suppress his enemies while in office, and he conceded to the election. | ||
So, if he's a dictator, he really sucks at being one. | ||
Now, I wonder why you weren't outraged when the current president, Joe Biden, said that mega is an extremist movement that does not share the basic beliefs in our democracy. | ||
That's half of the people of the country. | ||
And he still uses that label to this day. | ||
And again, no outrage when Biden's Department of Justice labeled thousands of parents protesting pornographic books and the transgender agenda forced to their kids as a terrorist threat. | ||
Trump himself, his allies, and his supporters are being hunted by Biden's FBI and DOJ one by one right now. | ||
So my question is, what the f*** are you smoking? | ||
Hoo-wee! | ||
Brilliant. Damon Imani with another absolute banger. | ||
This is the world we live in. | ||
If it's potentially going to happen from Trump, they get exactly what's going on. | ||
When they're actually already doing it, total silence. | ||
They love it. Alright, welcome back. | ||
Ladies and gentlemen, this is War Room. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
My guest this hour is Nate Kane. | ||
He's running for Congress in District 2 of West Virginia. | ||
He's a U.S. Army veteran who's traveled the world with his family due to his military service. | ||
He continued to serve his country as U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps civil servant and defense contractor in cybersecurity engineering for over two decades. | ||
He now stands for the Constitution, God, and all of the wonderful things that made this country great in the first place. | ||
He can be followed on Twitter at NateCain4WV, and that's the number four. | ||
That's also his website, NateCain4WV.com or NateCain.Win. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us, Mr. | ||
Cain. Hey, thank you so much for having me on. | ||
My pleasure. And what a day to have you on as, you know, you're a big champion for the Constitution. | ||
And I mean, say it a bunch, but we're in this weird position where we don't need some new form of government. | ||
You know, we're in this bad situation and a lot of people want to institute socialism or communism or try something new. | ||
We don't need anything new. We just need the Constitution. | ||
We have just gone so far from that bullseye target. | ||
Now we're in unrecognizable waters. | ||
What can we do to get back to a constitutional republic that actually sticks to the laws of the land? | ||
Well, ironically, of course, everyone in Congress has sworn the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. | ||
And what we see today is we see a massive amount of domestic enemies. | ||
You know, the fact is, is that I'm less afraid of the Chinese communists overseas, you know, attacking our shores. | ||
Why would they need to? | ||
They've already infiltrated our country with their ideology, with wokeism. | ||
With this authoritarianism that we're beginning to see within the Biden administration, the abuses of the FBI, and the Department of Justice. | ||
So what we have to do to get back to a constitutional republic, I honestly believe we're at the point now where we need to strip the federal government of some of their powers. | ||
You know, starting with the FBI. You know, there was a point where I thought, well, maybe the FBI was salvageable. | ||
Maybe if we just shrunk the size of it a little bit, took away some of the tools that they've misused and abused. | ||
But now I'm of the opinion that they need to be stripped of all power. | ||
I think the FBI has now become a weaponized force, you know, for the Democrats. | ||
Basically, they are the weaponized A force operating on behalf of the Democrat Party to go after Republicans. | ||
I mean, that's really what they're doing now. | ||
I think it's pretty undeniable that that's exactly what they're doing. | ||
They are essentially, for all intents and purposes, the Stasi of the ruling regime. | ||
I mean, the secret police force. | ||
That's right. And the most frustrating part, maybe for me, is the fact that Our Congress has allowed their power to be usurped, has allowed themselves to be neutered and prevented from doing anything effective to rein in this out of control governmental organization, the FBI, to the extent that Congress can make demands and the FBI doesn't want to adhere to them. | ||
There's nothing the Congress seems able or willing to do. | ||
So the FBI just sort of smirks and gets away with it. | ||
So Well, I think you hit it on at least one of those points. | ||
They don't have the willingness to do what's necessary. | ||
They have the power. | ||
They have the power of the purse. | ||
They could defund the FBI right now. | ||
They could do it. They could basically block any additional funding. | ||
They could go in there and do that, but they don't seem to have the willingness to do it. | ||
Now, I have to ask myself, why in the world would 70 members of the Republican Party Vote along with giving the FBI $300 million to build a new FBI headquarters in Maryland, you know, that is supposedly going to be bigger than the Pentagon. | ||
Why would they go along with that? | ||
Well, I'll tell you. We've learned from federal judges that have released information in the last three months that the FBI has been misusing Section 702 of FISA. Now, we've known this for a long time, but to hear a federal judge actually say it, that over 257,000 American citizens, mostly related to January 6th, but also many related to the George Floyd protests, Had Section 702 of FISA used on them. | ||
That is a warrantless search that gives access to everyone's digital data. | ||
And if that was just it, that would be bad enough. | ||
But you have this quasi-public-private partnership with these big tech companies. | ||
And not just big tech companies, but the banks too. | ||
I mean, we know that the Bank of America gave up all the information Without a warrant on all of the people who were using their credit cards in Washington, D.C. around January 6th, we have seen the complete weaponization and police state of our country. | ||
Yeah, and Obviously, another aspect of it is the fact that these groups, not necessarily the FBI, but certainly the NSA and others, are actually spying on Congress themselves. | ||
So, I mean, once they are able to get blackmail or some sort of coercive measure over the Congress, then the Congress will be neutered in their ability to do anything to stop them. | ||
I mean, it's sort of a feedback loop of corruption and spying and censorship and surveillance. | ||
And you're right. Republicans go up there and complain about what the FBI is doing, demand changes be made, the FBI smirks and all but spits in their face, and then they write them a $300 million check. | ||
I mean, obviously they're going to continue doing what they're doing because nothing's being done to stop them. | ||
It's really kind of baffling to me because what do they expect from To happen here. | ||
They expect the FBI to just, you know, come to Jesus and say, oh, gee, we really regret how we've been acting, like on their own volition. | ||
It's insane. If nobody stops this, it's just going to keep going. | ||
Is this that hard to understand? | ||
That's right. And, you know, for a lot of people who might think, oh, what a conspiracy theory that the FBI would be blackmailing, you know, members of Congress. | ||
They've done it before. Of course. | ||
Let's not forget J. Edgar Hoover. | ||
He had blackmail on many members of Congress, many sitting judges, many people who were in positions of, you know, prominence. | ||
And so it's that the FBI from its very inception was utilizing blackmail. | ||
They're at it again. I guarantee it. | ||
I don't trust them at all. | ||
They need to be, you know, completely stripped of all of these tools. | ||
Remember, FISA stands for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. | ||
There's nothing about that that is American. | ||
It is absolutely unconstitutional. | ||
And here's the biggest problem that I see. | ||
When you look at what the law states, there's a federal law that it's called deprivation of rights under color of law. | ||
Now, If, you know, if a cop, if a regular beat cop, you know, say puts a wiretap on your phone or something like that or breaks into your home to look for evidence without a warrant, He will get arrested by the FBI for deprivation of rights under color of law and charged in due prison time. | ||
But if the FBI does it, nobody is held responsible. | ||
And why is that? Because you have the Fox guard in the hen house. | ||
The FBI is never going to investigate themselves and the DOJ is never going to indict themselves or one of their own. | ||
We need an Article 1 tribunal under Article 1, Section 8. | ||
I believe this is one of the things that Congress could do. | ||
They could create a special tribunal whose job would be to adjudicate these issues within the FBI and within the Department of Justice. | ||
And there need to be real consequences. | ||
People need to go to prison over this. | ||
If they don't, they're going to continue to do it. | ||
But as another measure, Congress can defund them. | ||
But the real question is, why aren't they? | ||
Why won't they? And so I've got to wonder, how many of these people are compromised? | ||
We just saw that there was a sting that was done by the Department of Justice, and they busted a massive, high-end prostitution ring, and they said that there were members of the government, elected officials that were part of this. | ||
Are any of them members of Congress? | ||
How many of these guys are involved in this kind of stuff? | ||
And why aren't their names released? | ||
Is it so that the DOJ can blackmail them to do their bidding? | ||
That's what I would like to know. | ||
That was one of the most bizarre stories. | ||
We covered it on our show where they come out and they say, yeah, these guys had to send in their IDs and other credentials to prove who they were. | ||
So it's not like they have some anonymous list of people and it's nearby D.C. Some of them might have been. | ||
No, they know exactly who was there, exactly what they were doing, and not a single one of the names has been released, let alone action taken against them. | ||
And I totally agree with you that obviously defunding is a first step. | ||
But another frustrating thing to me is you get Republicans up there banging their chest and going, we demand he recuses himself or we demand that he apologize. | ||
And it's like these people are violating our basic rights. | ||
They're undermining and undercutting our very system. | ||
And you want to send them to get a $10 million job a year at Facebook? | ||
No. They should be in prison. | ||
They should be punished. They should be made an example of. | ||
So the next FBI director that comes along goes, gee, I better not touch the stove. | ||
It's pretty hot. We need to teach them that lesson. | ||
More with Nate Cain on the other side. | ||
NateCain4WV on Twitter. | ||
I got some videos I want to get your reaction to, Nate. | ||
Welcome back, folks. This is The War Room. | ||
I'm your host, Harrison Smith. I haven't even mentioned Owen today, and that's my fault. | ||
DefendOwen.com, of course, is where you go to contribute to his legal defense fund. | ||
We were supposed to get a call yesterday. | ||
We waited all afternoon. | ||
It never came. We got news later in the day that it had been rescheduled for today, but we still don't have any news about that. | ||
So, again, I'll bring you whatever information we have as soon as we get it. | ||
And I've been reaching out to some of his team to try to figure out what the latest is. | ||
But as of now, we have no update for you about Owen. | ||
He is still radio silent, as he has been for the last two, two and a half weeks at this point. | ||
Very upsetting stuff, but again, we are feeling just as hopeless as everybody else out there. | ||
And I will bring you any information as we find it. | ||
DefendOwen.com Nathan Cain. | ||
And Nate Cain is my guest at NateCain4WV. | ||
His website, NateCain4WV.com or NateCain.Win. | ||
He's a U.S. Army veteran. | ||
And of course is very concerned about the abuse of power taking place in our federal government right now, specifically with the FBI. Nate, I want to get your response to this video. | ||
Clip number seven. This is Representative Clay Higgins asking FBI Director Wray some questions about FBI informants on January 6th. | ||
And of course, the Democrats are there to be the guard dog of the FBI, which... | ||
We can get into all the strangeness around this clip, but I'd love your response from this. | ||
Here's a short clip from yesterday. | ||
Representative Clay Higgins getting cut off by Democrats trying to question Christopher Wray about undercover operatives in the crowd on January 6th. | ||
Let's watch. He said he was communicating with his FBI handler while people were entering the U.S. Capitol. | ||
Can you confirm that the FBI had that sort of engagement with your own agents embedded within to the crowd on January 6th? | ||
If you are asking whether the violence at the Capitol on January 6th was part of some operation orchestrated by FBI sources and or agents, the answer is emphatically not. | ||
You're saying no? No. You're saying no, okay. | ||
Not violence orchestrated by FBI sources or agents. | ||
Are you familiar with, you know what a ghost vehicle is? | ||
Director of the FBI certainly should. | ||
You know what a ghost bus is? | ||
A ghost bus? Ghost bus. | ||
I'm not sure I've used that term before. | ||
Okay. It's pretty common in law enforcement. | ||
It's a vehicle that's used for secret purposes. | ||
It's painted over. These two buses in the middle here, they were the first to arrive at Union Station on January 6th. | ||
0500. I have all this evidence. | ||
I'm showing you a tip of this iceberg. | ||
Mr. Chairman. These two buses are painted completely white. | ||
Point of order. Point of order. | ||
Sure. Just run over the time. | ||
unidentified
|
I understand. But you'll recall that Ms. | |
Jackson Lee's been allowed to go two minutes before. | ||
I've been very fair in letting people finish their questioning throughout my tenure as chairman. | ||
And I'll continue to be fair on that regard. | ||
But I will make a note to the members. | ||
If you could stay as close within your time as possible, we have a lot of people that want to ask these gentlemen questions. | ||
So, with that, the gentleman yields. | ||
But your point, I've been very fair in this, Mr. | ||
Ivey. I don't think I accuse you of being unfair, Mr. | ||
Chairman. You're making a point. | ||
Okay, thank you. May I close this statement, Mr. | ||
Chairman? No, I think your time is expired, Mr. | ||
Chairman. I note that other members across the aisle have been granted time, and I object to my question being closed. | ||
This is a very significant hearing, Mr. | ||
Chairman, and these buses are nefarious in nature and we're filled with With FBI informants dressed as Trump supporters. | ||
Deployed onto our Capitol on January 6th. | ||
Your day is coming, Mr. | ||
unidentified
|
Ray. Your day is coming, Mr. | |
Ray. Pretty powerful statement. | ||
What's your takeaway of that, Nate Kane? | ||
I'm certain that he has, there's probably some whistleblowers. | ||
I'm sure he probably has some additional information. | ||
And I don't think he would, as a sitting member of Congress, be making the comment that he just made, you know, your day is coming, if that weren't the case. | ||
The fact is, is that the FBI was involved. | ||
You had the Capitol Police that was hiding information as well. | ||
It was a very coordinated thing that happened on that day. | ||
I'll call it what it was. It was a false flag. | ||
They absolutely were involved in provoking the crowd, getting them to, you know, go in there and attack. | ||
Of course, there's been tons of video evidence of Ray Epps, who was basically shouting and telling people, let's go, let's rush the building. | ||
And of course, this man was never charged with anything. | ||
And yet, we have a ton Of political prisoners right now that have been held without due process. | ||
They've not been allowed a speedy trial, which they are guaranteed under the Constitution. | ||
They haven't been allowed bail, which they are guaranteed under the Constitution. | ||
They haven't been allowed to even get proper representation. | ||
And also, I know that in terms of their ability to even have religious services, they've been denied religious services for three years. | ||
You know, we don't even do that to our prisoners of war. | ||
The Geneva Convention would not allow us to do that. | ||
We're treating American citizens worse than we treat prisoners of war. | ||
It's disgusting. It is. | ||
It's pathetic. | ||
And another thing that stood out to me was that you have this Democrat, of course, speak up and trying to shut down the questioning of Christopher Wray because they're completely in favor of the politicized FBI going after their political opponents. | ||
But then you have the Republican who's leading the proceedings. | ||
Sort of say, well, but I've given extra time to Democrats, but then also capitulate to the Democrat who's demanding he shut down the Republican. | ||
To me, it's whoever. | ||
I don't even know who that was who was carrying out the— Yeah, I'd like to know who that was, and I'd like to know if—is he one of the 70 that gave the $300 million to the FBI? That's what I want to know. | ||
Probably so. It's— It's disgusting what's going on, and my prayers go out to Owen Schroer and all of the January 6th political prisoners. | ||
We have to keep them in prayer, and we have to demand that they are set free. | ||
They need to not only be set free, but they should have absolutely, there needs to be recompense made to them. | ||
And then these guys that basically brought these bogus charges, that brought these enhancements, giving guys 20 years, in some cases for people who weren't even there. | ||
Right. That is absolutely, you know, just an ungodly, you know, atrocious. | ||
We have to have justice. | ||
And that means that when this is all said and done, and when Trump does get reelected, and we clear out the FBI and we clear out the Department of Justice, cases need to be brought against all of those for prosecutorial misconduct. | ||
unidentified
|
All of them. And I like this idea of a jail. | |
Well, 100%. I hadn't heard of this idea of the tribunal before. | ||
We have a minute left in this segment. | ||
Can you talk a little bit more about Article 1, Section 8? | ||
Yeah, so there is something called a congressional tribunal. | ||
What is different about it than, say, an Article 3? | ||
And a tribunal just means court. | ||
But what it is, is it is a court that would be set up by Congress. | ||
The appointments would be made by Congress. | ||
It would only be subordinate to the Supreme Court. | ||
And the purpose and point of it would be to adjudicate deprivation of rights under color of law by our Department of Justice and by the FBI, since they don't have anybody who's going to prosecute them and who's going to bring charges against them. | ||
You would need to have some sort of citizen's grand jury that would be put together to bring these cases and probably some sort of special prosecutor to bring these cases against the FBI. And against the, you know, the leadership at the DOJ as well. | ||
But the appointments of these judges are not permanent. | ||
They are temporary. And the great thing about this, if the court got out of hand, they could simply, you know, basically bring it down by reducing their salaries down to zero. | ||
So it's something we definitely should consider. | ||
If that's not a reason to vote for Nate Kane, I don't know what is. | ||
We'll be right back, folks. Don't go anywhere. | ||
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
This is The War Room. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
Support us by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Infowarsstore.com is the only place that we get any funding at all. | ||
We don't have any advertisers that can threaten to withdraw funding to get us to shut up about something. | ||
And it's not just... The War Room or The Alex Jones Show or American Journal. | ||
It's all of those, plus band.video, plus Infowars.com is a true media conglomerate we have created here with the help of you that we have all created and you're included in that we because the audience is an integral part of the effect that we've had by sharing the truth in opposition to the lies of the mainstream media. | ||
support us in this mission and help yourself with incredible products by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
And my guest this hour is Nate Kane. | ||
He's running for Congress in District 2 of West Virginia. | ||
His Twitter can be found at NateKane4WV and that's the number 4 WV. | ||
You can also go to NateKane.win to see his website. | ||
The story that we just talked about, the video that we just showed can be found on Infowars. | ||
Democrat tries to cut off GOP rep grilling FBI Director Wray over busloads of Fed informants dressed as Trump supporters in January 6th crowd. | ||
One thing I've been frustrated with, Nate, is that Democrats... | ||
If you talk to him about how the FBI used to spy on civil rights leaders like MLK and try to get him to commit suicide by writing him threatening letters or that they may have had a hand in his assassination or the assassination of Malcolm X or a number of civil rights leaders, they're perfectly aware of the corruption of the FBI. Yet somehow they're totally fine with the FBI doing this to their fellow Americans now because they're targeting Trump supporters and patriots. | ||
I wonder if you're like me where I'm against it when they do it to Martin Luther King. | ||
I'm against it when they do it to Stuart Rhodes. | ||
The consistent belief to me is that the federal government should not have unwarranted power to target political dissidents in the United States of America. | ||
But the Democrats seem incapable of having some standard of behavior across the board. | ||
It's all dependent on who is being targeted at that particular time. | ||
What's your take on that? | ||
Look, I'm back, shoot, right after 9-11 When the Bush administration brought forward or signed into law the Patriot Act, I was opposed to it then. | ||
In fact, at that time, I was a sitting city councilman in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania for a very short period of time, just one term. | ||
But it was right around that time and I ended up signing on there that I was opposed to it because I saw for what it was. | ||
It was an opportunity for them to breach our Constitution. | ||
And certainly, that is what they have done and they will continue to do. | ||
That's why they cannot be trusted with those tools. | ||
One of the things that I will be pushing for, Lord willing, I get elected, is I want to make sure that we have a, you know, get a citizen's bill of rights, basically, that protects our privacy online. | ||
You know, the fact is, is that these companies should not be able to share data with the FBI without a warrant, period. | ||
Whether it is Bank of America or whether it is Twitter, whether it is Facebook, let's remember, you know, when Tucker Carlson had his interview, his last interview, I think, was with Elon Musk. | ||
And he asked Elon Musk, Elon Musk said that when he took over, the FBI had total access to everything. | ||
And Tucker asked him, he said, even our DMs? | ||
And he said, yes. That should tell us everything we need to know about how involved they are in spying on the American people. | ||
It's not just that they're controlling the narrative. | ||
It's not just that they're using things like the Smith-Month Modernization Act to basically propagandize the American people. | ||
And that's something else that needs to be repealed. | ||
But they're also doing things like You know, going in there and making these deals with these companies, giving them immunity so they can lie to us on our privacy policy. | ||
All of this has to be exposed. | ||
All of it. Absolutely. | ||
And of course, again, we're sort of confronted with this frustration that to me, the Constitution does tell the government that they can't do these things. | ||
I mean, we have the Fourth Amendment against warrantless search and seizure. | ||
We have the First Amendment that allows us unrestricted Free speech. | ||
And in the First Amendment, the five freedoms, one of them is freedom of the press, which to me, if you're writing this in 1776, that means literally the physical press. | ||
In other words, freedom of the technology of widespread information, of being able to get your message out. | ||
So I guess it just needs a modernization, an update to just solidify and confirm that yes, modern technology doesn't allow you to just circumvent the You know, Constitution at your will. | ||
That's right. If there's a reasonable expectation of privacy, and that means your private messages, I'm not talking about something that you go out and foolishly post online. | ||
If you're posting something online, that's for the world to see. | ||
But if it's a private message, why should the government have access to that without a warrant? | ||
I don't think any judge in the land that has any semblance of understanding of the Constitution would believe that that's okay. | ||
Yet that is exactly what has been going on. | ||
It's been going on with our financial records. | ||
It's been going on with our private messages and social media. | ||
I was going through and looking at the January 6th cases, and I was looking on the DOJ's website and reading the complaints. | ||
And the number one way that they brought evidence against these guys was stuff that they got out of telegram channels and things like that. | ||
They basically grabbed everything they could through social media to use it to build a case against these guys. | ||
Right. And then they, you know, take stuff completely out of context when they're, you know, they're just like saying off color joke and they go, well, now you have to go to jail for 20 years because you said that off. | ||
I mean, it's when you actually read the transcripts of those cases, it is astonishing that they've been able to get away with. | ||
And maybe maybe remember, you know, Greg. | ||
Go ahead. Remember the Gretchen Whitmore case? | ||
It turned out you had three guys that basically had nothing to do with anything. | ||
And there was like seven guys that were all feds or informants working for the feds that were the ones that basically spurring them on with this concocted idea of going after Gretchen Whitmore to kidnap her. | ||
I mean, basically, it was the definition of entrapment. | ||
Right. Right, and that's just what I mean with the Proud Boys case. | ||
I just can't get over it. They used the term unspoken conspiracy, and the fact that people are being charged and convicted on a, quote, unspoken conspiracy, a telepathic conspiracy, I mean, it is so egregious what they're doing now. | ||
I was going to say maybe the crew can find there's a clip from this year of Christopher Wray at the World Economic Forum Global Government Summit bragging about the way that the FBI is working with the social media companies specifically to circumvent the First Amendment. | ||
And the Second Amendment, the Third and the Fourth and the Fifth Amendment. | ||
So, you know, this is all happening out in the open. | ||
They're not exactly disguising it in any way. | ||
And I want to talk about that and the way the FBI is purging Christians, conservatives and patriots of any stripe. | ||
But let me ask you this. We have two minutes left in this segment. | ||
A lot of people, a lot of our audience, frankly, thinks I'm stupid for thinking that we could vote our way out of this. | ||
Can we vote our way out of this, Nate? | ||
You know, I'm experimenting with that right now. | ||
I am not your typical candidate. | ||
I'm not beholden to lobbyists. | ||
I don't have any kind of political background. | ||
You know, I am not somebody that is politically connected. | ||
I'm not taking money from super PACs. | ||
I'm not taking money from corporations. | ||
I am running this as a clean race as best I can because I want to see if it's possible to get elected without being beholden to anybody except for the people that put you in there. | ||
You know, the fact is, is that we send an awful lot of people down to Washington, D.C. with the title representative, and I don't see them representing us very much. | ||
Instead, I see them representing the special interests. | ||
I see them representing foreign governments. | ||
I see them representing—I mean, why is it that when we're—was it $33.7 trillion in debt? | ||
We can somehow find money to send $13 billion to the Ukraine this year and $12 billion last year. | ||
I mean, we're $33 trillion in debt. | ||
What are we thinking? So I look at things like that, and we can somehow find $300 million to give to the FBI. They have a perfectly good building to work out of, and they want to give them $300 million so they can expand the size of that building and basically make even more of an intimidating presence in the United States. | ||
It's insane what's happening. | ||
I do believe that we can still win, but it means that people who are going to run that are good candidates, they're going to have to do it the old-fashioned way. | ||
And like I'm doing, going out there and actually talking to people and meeting with them and doing a good ground game of actually, you know, getting out there and listening to what the people have to say and then trying to do something even before you get elected to help them, to show them that you're willing to earn their vote. | ||
Absolutely. I completely agree, as you're sort of pointing out there. | ||
I mean, it's the federal government that's causing all of these problems. | ||
It can also fix them if we get the right people in. | ||
All right, folks, this will be the final segment of The War Room with my guest, Nate Kane. | ||
He's running for Congress in District 2 of West Virginia at NateKane4WV on Twitter. | ||
You can go to NateKane.Win.com. | ||
And that redirects to NateKane4WV.com. | ||
Talking about the FBI and the corruption there. | ||
Let's go ahead and play this clip I was talking about. | ||
Here's Christopher Wray earlier this year at a World Economic Forum bragging about, well, essentially circumventing the First Amendment by cooperating with corporations. | ||
Let's watch. And I think the sophistication of the private sector is improving, and particularly important, the level of collaboration between the private sector and the government, especially the FBI, has, I think, made significant strides. | ||
Pretty much every technology we could talk about today, we see both great opportunity but great dangers in the wrong hand. | ||
So they're saying a very intense collaboration. | ||
Now, for years, whenever we talked about the way that social media censored patriots, it was like a chorus. | ||
It was like the only response we heard was, well, they're a private company. | ||
Well, they're a private company. But this is what we were pointing out, is that the federal government is working with the private companies to circumvent basic Bill of Rights amendments to the Constitution. | ||
I mean, how do we stop this? | ||
You know what they call that? | ||
It's called fascism. It's a corporate state. | ||
So when you have the federal government basically working on behalf of the corporate interests, that's fascism. | ||
That's what that is. We're living in a neo-fascist form of government right now because of these things. | ||
Now, we have the opportunity to change it, but the courts are going to have to step in, and they're going to have to say, you can't do this. | ||
The fact is, though, is we don't know how many of our judges are corrupted. | ||
You know, this is the problem with Section 702 and FISA. We don't know who's being blackmailed. | ||
Could be judges, could be members of Congress. | ||
There needs to be a thorough investigation into all of that. | ||
There needs to be total transparency. | ||
You know, I was just thinking about The FBI's annual budget request, I think for 2024, it's $11.4 billion. | ||
What are they doing with that $11.4 billion? | ||
How much of it is used on the spy apparatus? | ||
The Department of Homeland Security's got an even larger budget. | ||
It's hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
And obviously, they're not using it to secure our border. | ||
So what is it being used for? | ||
I think there needs to be a total accounting of every dime spent by all these agencies. | ||
Absolutely, and it's almost cliche at this point that whenever there's a mass shooter or some other horrific act of violence, it's only usually a matter of hours before it comes out that, well, they were on an FBI watch list. | ||
The latest one was a former member of the military who killed a police officer and took two people hostage, and the FBI said, oh yeah, he was on one of our watch lists too, but if these so-called watch lists are filled up with people Parents who are protesting pornography in elementary schools and people protesting abortion clinics or people who wear a red MAGA hat, you know, obviously the actual threats are going to get lost in this deluge of non-threats that are purely political. | ||
So it's not just the FBI being corrupt. | ||
They're being thoroughly mismanaged. | ||
And I say in addition to the violation of the First Amendment. | ||
It's fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
Right. And it's dereliction of duty. | ||
Yep. You know, Steve Friend, he's a friend of mine, and he's one of the FBI whistleblowers that exposed some of these things that the FBI was doing. | ||
When they created this task force, they pulled him and many, many other FBI agents away from real work. | ||
In his case, I think he was going after a child pornography ring to bring it down, and they pulled him off the case to pull him into Washington, D.C. to go after grandmas that walked around in the Capitol for 15 minutes and walked out without doing anything. | ||
They wanted to basically bring their forces together to go and kick down the doors of little old ladies. | ||
That's what the FBI has come to now. | ||
Right. Right. | ||
And there, I'm not sure if it was Mr. | ||
Friend or somebody else who said, basically, there's more agents on domestic terror than there are actual domestic terrorists. | ||
I mean, they're making up and having to, like, come up with excuses to justify their own existence because the threat that they're supposedly fighting doesn't actually exist. | ||
Yeah, Garrett O'Boyle, by the way, he's the one that exposed that they were, you know, fudging their numbers and everything so that they could justify, you know, these increased budgets and everything. | ||
And by the way, you know, there was a Washington Times story that just came out. | ||
And there was an exclusive showing that the FBI was targeting veterans. | ||
Basically, utilizing someone's veteran status to identify them as potential Trump supporters and thereby make claims that they had a disloyalty to their country and that they should be looked at for furtherance of whether or not they should hold a security clearance. | ||
They're basically trying to force anybody who's a conservative out of the FBI. These are all the reasons why they need to be shut down and completely disbanded at this point. | ||
It is a completely weaponized, one-sided organization now. | ||
And they're going after veterans of all people. | ||
And in fact, there was an article where they had testimony because now these people, they got in trouble and so they have to actually admit to what they had said and what they had heard. | ||
But one of the things that was said We're going to F with this mother effer. | ||
They're referring to Garrett O'Boyle, who is an upstanding patriot, a veteran, a family man, a Christian, somebody who loves his country, and this is what they've done to him, and it's what they've done to a lot of people. | ||
By the way, I'm a veteran. | ||
And I was working at the FBI, and I blew the whistle doing it the right way, and I went through all the right channels, and yet they sent 16 agents, four months after I completed my whistleblowing, they sent 16 agents to my home, they raided my home, they interrogated me for several hours, they went after my kids interrogating them as well, and my neighbors and friends and things like that. | ||
It was a horrible ordeal, but they did it in order to send a very strong message to everyone in the FBI | ||
that if you don't get in line with what we want, then you will become our target. | ||
Well, good on you for not backing down. | ||
Obviously, it was meant to intimidate you, and that's not going to work, especially if you get elected to Congress, which I remind everybody, District 2 of West Virginia, at NateKane4WV on Twitter. | ||
NateKane4WV.com is the website where you can go to support that mission. | ||
And what you're saying is exactly what this article says that I wanted to bring to your attention from public.substack.com by Alex Gutentag. | ||
FBI is purging Christians, conservatives, COVID skeptics, new whistleblowers allege. | ||
And they talk about the way that the FBI basically says, well, these aren't real whistleblowers because, you know, whatever we say that they're not. | ||
And so now they're revoking their security clearances. | ||
It's just one way of getting back at them. | ||
But now, yet more FBI employees have come forward to make protected whistleblower disclosures to the House Judiciary Committee. | ||
The new disclosures, which public obtained copies of, suggest the FBI Security Division has knowingly retaliated against at least one whistleblower and is improperly using security clearance investigations to single out others. | ||
And all of these are a feedback loop, whether it's the free speech or the... | ||
You know, presence of good patriots in the FBI, the longer they're allowed to operate in the way that they are, the harder it will become to ever set things right. | ||
I mean, if we can't talk about things we want on social media, we'll never get elected on those promises. | ||
We'll never have the power to change them. | ||
So the longer this goes on, the harder it gets to right this ship. | ||
Absolutely. Absolutely. | ||
Look, you know, we can't also, we got to recognize that this is a spiritual war just as much as it's a physical one. | ||
Look, you know, this stuff angers me. | ||
It pisses me off. You know, I want to get in there and do something about it. | ||
But I also recognize that we're in a place right now where we need God's help. | ||
We need people to be praying. | ||
Look, our founders understood the concept of providence. | ||
They understood that without God's help, there's no way that you can survive as a nation, especially in the form of government that we have, you know, as a constitutional republic. | ||
We need to have a moral people. | ||
And right now, there's a lot of immorality that's going on inside, you know, inside the FBI, inside several of our federal agencies, and honestly, within the Congress as well. | ||
We need a complete revival in this nation, but at the same time, we've got to be willing to fight the fight. | ||
And you're right. I'm not afraid of these people. | ||
After going through what I went through, maybe that's why the Lord allowed me to go through it. | ||
You know, I stood up against the FBI, against the DOJ senior leadership. | ||
I stood up against Hillary Clinton and Russian intelligence agents, and I lived to tell the tale, and not without their trying to take me out. | ||
I can tell you that. But you know what? | ||
God got me through it, and I'm not afraid of them anymore. | ||
Absolutely incredible. And of course, put a little bow on it, you know, about morality. | ||
Kind of hard to blackmail people that don't frequent whorehouses or pedophile islands, right? | ||
I mean, immorality is a key aspect of being able to blackmail someone. | ||
That's right. And that's another area, too. | ||
Why haven't they released the names of the people who were on the flight logs to pedophile island? | ||
Why not? It's the same reason they're not releasing the names of these people who were caught up in this prostitution ring because they want to control them. | ||
Blackmail is the currency of power in the United States as it is now. | ||
Well, you'd have my vote if I was in West Virginia. | ||
Anybody in West Virginia District 2, you've got to tell your friends about Nate Cain on Twitter at NateCain4WV. | ||
The website also, NateCain4WV.com. | ||
Thank you so much for joining us, Mr. | ||
Cain. Thank you, and God bless. | ||
Now, I'm about to talk about something really historic and very, very exciting. | ||
There's a lot of angles to this in the limited time we have. | ||
But America has been a special place because we aspired to liberty and freedom when nobody else was aspiring to it. | ||
We weren't perfect. We were far from it. | ||
But it was a place where experiments were allowed and where people could really try to prove themselves, not because of what family they came from or because they were from royalty, but a meritocracy based on what they could produce, what they could do. | ||
There were two things that really fueled and funded the colonies and the launch of America in 1776. | ||
And both of them are interesting. | ||
Both of them have dark histories. | ||
But both of them are something that you can enjoy responsibly. | ||
That's, of course, tobacco and the Virginia colony. | ||
And that's, of course, whiskey. | ||
And Sam Adams with whiskey and beer was one of the main boosters and funders, in fact probably the biggest funder, of George Washington and our troops. | ||
So it was whiskey and beer, not wine, the liberals love to drink, I'm not against wine, | ||
it's just a fact, that literally fueled the start of our country, along with this, tobacco. | ||
And I enjoy both, but I've really gotten good over the years at being responsible. | ||
Sometimes I might go four months, that's the longest I've gone in the last few years, with | ||
no tobacco or no alcohol. | ||
But when I'm with friends, when I'm with family, when I'm with Patriots, I enjoy both of them | ||
and they go together like a horse and carriage. | ||
So, two years ago I got approached by great Patriots from some of my connections who are | ||
major craft whiskey producers in Kentucky. | ||
So they brought me dozens of these amazing whiskeys that they had developed and also procured. | ||
And out of all of them, I like this Kentucky straight bourbon. | ||
And again, I'm no whiskey connoisseur. | ||
I just know what tastes good, what I like, what tastes good. | ||
It feels good, which doesn't give you that big hangover after I liked out of dozens, over a dozen I tried, this whiskey. | ||
Now, the bad news is they only had so many barrels of it, and so it's a limited supply. | ||
There's 10,000 bottles of this as of the time I'm cutting this. | ||
And it is amazing. | ||
And it's been ready for a year because of leftists trying to block it being in stores and behind the scenes harassment and debanking and stuff of this major whiskey company. | ||
This has been in the warehouse for a year. | ||
So it wasn't just aged for the years, it was in the barrels. | ||
It's been aged by their censorship and went from amazing to incredible. | ||
So, it's a very special bottle too. | ||
That's why we have all these government documents here in front of me right here. | ||
Because if you aim a blacklight at ConspiracyBourbon, ConspiracyBourbon.com is the only place to get it. | ||
It's got all of these hidden messages on it, on the front and on the back. | ||
So like I said, this is really, really special. | ||
Limited run, only place to get it. | ||
We have the conspiracy imperatives, ten of them, kind of the Ten Commandments. | ||
There's only 10,000 bottles of this at conspiracybourbon.com. | ||
Destroy the Tyrants. It just goes on and on. | ||
This is very, very special. | ||
I would imagine that most people that get this are never going to open it. | ||
Gut level, I think this is going to be a major collector's item. | ||
We could have sold it for $200 in the market. | ||
It's 60-something bucks instead, and it's a fundraiser for the operation. | ||
We're really, really, really, really proud of it. | ||
So while you're hanging out with your friends, your family, your co-workers, you name it, It's really important to remember what Americana is all about, and if you are somebody that likes a fine whiskey, well, this is it, and it funds the InfoWars. | ||
A true 360 win. | ||
For myself, the entire InfoWars crew, here's to you, and here's to America. | ||
This isn't some Dylan Mulvaney, Anheuser-Busch, transgenderism, you know, creepazoid targeting our children. | ||
This is high-quality American Kentucky Whiskey, Kentucky bourbon, funding the second American revolution against tyrants. | ||
So here's all the past patriots, the current patriots, and future patriots. | ||
This drink of conspiracy is for you. | ||
One place to get it, conspiracybourbon.com. |