Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Shortly after the one-month anniversary of the heart-wrenching disaster in Lahaina... | ||
| The locals faced a den of thieves. | ||
| When I was on the island last week, I appointed Bob Fenton, one of the nation's leading emergency managers, and I mean that, that's not hyperbole, who's been on the ground in Hawaii since before the fires erupted as our chief federal response coordinator. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen to what Biden said. | |
| He said Bob Fenton was placed there specifically for the long-term recovery of Maui. | ||
| There hadn't been any fire. | ||
| He was placed there before the fire. | ||
| Which means the fire was planned. | ||
| Build Back Better is not just a slogan. | ||
| They mean it. They're talking about building America back in a way that will be more sensible and have better energy for our people. | ||
| Stakeholders disguised as city council members. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you engaged? Are you a stakeholder? | |
| Are you written? Is your name listed as a stakeholder? | ||
| Of any of the redevelopment plans regarding a smart city, by a raise of hands, I would like to see a raise of hands. | ||
| Because the information is out there. | ||
| Raise of hands. I can tell you, Department of Planning, DLNR, DBED, Housing, all of you, all of these agencies, and I'm not saying to you directly, but you're here representing these agencies, therefore. | ||
| It is your responsibility to tell the truth. | ||
| We know very well that you guys, as the third largest stakeholders, the state, do want that land and can take it when you deem it a natural disaster. | ||
| And an army of federal, state and local goons unleashing the unthinkable. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I literally cannot get over there. | |
| That's just the way it is. I've been ordered not to let anyone cross the bridge. | ||
| They sent all the kids home from school because of the wind advisory. | ||
| And we found out yesterday that we lost a whole neighborhood of children. | ||
| I'm talking a thousand and fifty kids gone without a trace. | ||
| They have absolutely no clue where these children are. | ||
| It's like they vanished into thin air. | ||
| The Hawaii governor had downgraded the horror, claiming that the number of people missing had dropped to 66. | ||
| But the locals knew the awful truth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's in a thousand. | |
| Not hundreds. You tell me if it makes any sense. | ||
| One child, one child is dead. | ||
| All that destruction that you see, one child is dead. | ||
| Now they're saying only 66 people are missing. | ||
| There are 400 plus people they can't get a hold of, which makes no sense either. | ||
| You can see a bunch of school buses. | ||
| These are the school buses that were taken away from the fire by military professionals. | ||
| If you're looking for the children, they're probably Somewhere in this general facility. | ||
| This morning on the water in upcountry Maui, the first time toluene was detected in water samples taken from the Upper Kula treatment plant. | ||
| The lab reports are from August 14th and 16th and detected trace amounts well below the federal and state maximum contaminant level of 1,000 parts per billion. | ||
| Toluene is in the water. | ||
| What they failed to tell you is that toluene is commonly referred to as TNT. Yes, the same TNT that you find in dynamite or explosives. | ||
| While local propaganda attempts to brainwash the local Hawaiian people into not believing what their eyes see and their ears hear. | ||
|
unidentified
|
There were some outlandish conspiracy theory claims being made and shared on social media. | |
| Disinformation campaign immediately after the Maui wildfires was spread by China and Russia. | ||
| From weather warfare to floating bodies on another island, thousands of missing children, to a Maui land grab. | ||
| Experts say the online posts can start as genuine concern, but that China and Russia are now using artificial intelligence to amplify it, spread fear and distrust in government. | ||
| When you start talking about laser beams and heat rays coming from space that would take out people in Maui, come on, let's get real. | ||
| Somebody's home security camera, when one of the fires started, it was just an explosion. | ||
| So they could do multiple pulses. | ||
| In fact, so they got plenty of time to execute. | ||
| That's what you're saying, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It takes about two minutes for a one meter wide burst to set fires over a mile. | |
| And again, there's atmospheric interference, and that's why it's such an erratic pattern. | ||
| Governor Green said on HNN's Spotlight Now, he'll take disinformation concerns to the president. | ||
| Suggesting to our own social media types that there were thousands of children gone. | ||
| The problem is, that information is so abundant that the Chinese don't even know half of the story. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want him found. Not tomorrow, not after breakfast. | |
| Now! | ||
| Yes, sir! | ||
| Well... | ||
| Well what? | ||
| Man up and vanish like a fart in the wind! | ||
| I'm gonna go get my wind. | ||
| Nothing left but... | ||
| Damn rocks on the windowsill. | ||
| And that cupcake on the wall. | ||
| What's saying there, Fuzzy Bridges? | ||
| This is conspiracy. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| One big damn conspiracy! | ||
| And everyone's in on it! | ||
| This is the best way to make the world stop. | ||
| Unveiling the truth behind the globalist curtain. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| ♪♪♪ Welcome to the War Room, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I'm your host today, Chase Geyser, filling in for the great Owen Schroyer. | ||
| It is an honor and a pleasure to be here again with you this week. | ||
| I've also been hosting the American Journal in the mornings. | ||
| I'll be there tomorrow morning and Thursday morning as well because the great Harrison Smith is going to be on Tim Poole's podcast this week on TimCast tomorrow night. | ||
| So make sure you check that out if you are a listener of Tim Poole. | ||
| Or if not, I recommend that you listen to Harrison any day of the week. | ||
| But in other news regarding YouTube podcasters, YouTube influencers, YouTube suspends Russell Brand from making money off the streaming site after sex assault claims. | ||
| I can't believe this. | ||
| I mean, I can believe it, but I can't believe it because there's no way that they're... | ||
| Refusing to allow anyone accused of sexual assault to make money on the platform. | ||
| There's just simply no way that they could possibly keep track of every single monetized account on YouTube and then determine which ones have been accused of sexual assault or not and censor those. | ||
| So they're obviously very specifically... | ||
| Targeting Russell Brand because of his A, level of fame, and B, political affiliation to ensure that he cannot be monetized on the platform. | ||
| Fortunately, Russell Brand has been spending a lot of time growing his Rumble account, and I do believe a substantial number of his listeners may listen to him on Rumble exclusively. | ||
| I think he might have even had an exclusive deal with Rumble at one point, though. | ||
| Don't quote me on that because I'm not certain. | ||
| But the fact that YouTube is coming out and specifically censoring Russell Brand amid allegations... | ||
| Without any proof, there's been no trial. | ||
| There's been no indictment at all. | ||
| It's just like, oh, some journalists found some women who anonymously agreed to accuse you of sexual assault. | ||
| Therefore, we're gonna use that as an excuse to silence you. | ||
| How many journalists have accused the president of sexual assault? | ||
| How many journalists have accused Hunter Biden of being sexually abusive? | ||
| Countless on the right, but they don't take us seriously when we make these accusations | ||
| or these allegations based on actual evidence. | ||
| But they'll take any leftist mainstream media outlet seriously whenever it's convenient | ||
| for them as an excuse to censor right-wing voices. | ||
| And Russell Brand isn't even a right-wing guy. | ||
| I mean, I shouldn't call him right wing at all. | ||
| He's certainly traditionally been more of a socialist or more left of center in terms of the rhetoric that he uses. | ||
| I remember listening to Russell Brand on Joe Rogan years ago and being frustrated at some of the things that he said. | ||
| I certainly don't agree with Russell Brand all the time, but I don't doubt that he's a good person. | ||
| I don't doubt that he's earnest. | ||
| I do doubt that he's a rapist. | ||
| And he's been making a lot of Anti-New World Order, anti-globalist arguments on his show and on other shows lately. | ||
| And I think we may be able to find just what it is that triggered the globalists so much if we run clip six and watch what Andrew Tate had to say about him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go ahead and play clip six. I believe that Russell Brand started the fight against the Matrix by telling the truth. | |
| And if anyone doesn't know how he poked the bear, I'll show you right here. | ||
| It's very obvious. Look at this. | ||
| Out of respect for you and your show, I've brought some facts. | ||
| The pandemic created at least 40 new big pharma billionaires. | ||
| Pharmaceutical corporations like Moderna and Pfizer made $1,000 of profit every second from the COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
| Right, all right. | ||
| When it came to the profits, they took the profits. | ||
| When it came to the funding, you paid for the funding. | ||
| If you have an economic system in which pharmaceutical companies benefit hugely from medical emergencies, where a military industrial complex benefits from war, where energy companies benefit from energy crisis, you are going to generate states of perpetual crisis, where the interests of ordinary people separate from the interests of the elite. | ||
| Did you see how often Bill Maher tried to interrupt him too? | ||
| Didn't want him to go on. Didn't want him to make his point. | ||
| Didn't want him to finish his point. And sometimes I like what Bill says. | ||
| Sometimes I like how he's actually willing to come out against the left. | ||
| But just when I start to sort of warm up to him, he goes and does something like that and just frustrates the hell out of me. | ||
| But I think what we just saw there is the reason that Russell Brand is being accused of sexual assault. | ||
| Not because any sexual assault was actually committed and I think what we saw there is the reason why hundreds of journalists were tasked with interviewing hundreds of people and trying to find as many sources as possible who were willing to make these allegations over the months to come out with the story and what you saw there is why YouTube is now censoring Russell Brand or demonetizing his account. | ||
| And we know from the Twitter files. | ||
| I've talked about it on this show. I've talked about it on the American Journal. | ||
| We know, ever since Project Mockingbird, that the government has been intimately involved in the media narrative anywhere that media is broadcast. | ||
| We know that they've infiltrated the mainstream media outlets. | ||
| We know that they infiltrated the social media platforms, especially since they went public. | ||
| Twitter, namely, was infiltrated by the FBI, CIA, since it went public. | ||
| And, of course, it's been reclaimed. | ||
| And so we know that the government is intimately involved in Google, which of course owns YouTube. | ||
| And that's why we've seen such rampant censorship since 2016. | ||
| Because in 2016, we scared the hell out of the deep state by electing an outsider. | ||
| Something their hubris thought was impossible and would never occur in the United States of America. | ||
| And it happened and they freaked out and that's why they doubled down. | ||
| I don't know if you remember or not, but as soon as Trump was elected, the mainstream narrative came out and said it was because of the Cambridge Analytica scandal. | ||
| It was because of some Steve Bannon Russian collusion scandal whereby Facebook data vulnerabilities were exploited in order to hyper-target voters and discourage them from voting. | ||
| There were hearings about it. There were investigations about it. | ||
| But I actually went and looked at the ads that these hearings and these committees, | ||
| these investigations alleged were the catalyst for Russian involvement in the election, Russian | ||
| manipulation of our election. | ||
| And the ads were terrible. | ||
| I mean, we're talking misspelled, the gifts were low resolution, not even funny. | ||
| I make advertisements for a living. | ||
| This is what my business is. | ||
| I've made thousands upon thousands of advertisements and I've run millions upon millions of dollars | ||
| in ads for small businesses all over the world and over 30% of the world's nations. | ||
| So I know what a good ad looks like. | ||
| I know what a bad ad looks like. | ||
| And I know what's going to work. And I know what isn't going to work. | ||
| And I guarantee you that the ads that I downloaded that I looked at from the investigations of Cambridge Analytica did not convince anyone not to vote or to stay at home. | ||
| It was almost as if they just threw together some ads that they wanted to claim or that they wanted to allege were the reason for Trump's victory just so that they would have someone asked if there were any. | ||
| And so what they did was as soon as Trump was elected, the deep state freaked out. | ||
| They came out and they said Cambridge Analytica and other data vulnerabilities and these social media platforms were the reason that Donald Trump got elected because these platforms were exploited by our enemies like Russia and Russian collusion and Russian infiltration and manipulation of our election. | ||
| And you remember Zuckerberg went and looked like a robot, an alien robot, and was just absolutely terrified in his suit. | ||
| And he was just like, Senator, yes, Senator, sorry, Senator, we run ads. | ||
| And he had to speak to the Senate about it. | ||
| And that's exactly how the government infiltrates these businesses. | ||
| These businesses go from private to publicly traded with their IPOs. | ||
| They get a board of directors, and then they are infiltratable | ||
| because a board of directors is never gonna lead a company in the same way | ||
| as a CEO or an individual or an owner or a founder. | ||
| They're always going to consider the politically correct, mitigate risk and play ball with the government entities. | ||
| And that's exactly what happened. | ||
| Facebook ramped up its censorship. | ||
| They increased the amount of rules and regulations around all their advertising policies. | ||
| It's been a nightmare to do business with them since 2016. | ||
| And it's all because of the lie that these platforms were used by the right to win | ||
| or by our enemies to get a right winger in, when in fact, what's really going on | ||
| is they're doing that exact thing. | ||
| The left, the deep state is now using these platforms to make sure that any right wing voices are silenced. | ||
| To push ESG-related narratives or politically correct-related narratives or climate change-related narratives while silencing us. | ||
| And that's why they hate Elon Musk so much. | ||
| Because he's the only one that isn't under their control. | ||
| That's why they hate Infowars so much. | ||
| Because they can't control us. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back after this break. | ||
| make sure in the meantime you visit InfoWarsStore.com and be a part of the reason why this network | ||
| is still on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | |
| I'm your host, Matt McCheskey, and I'm joined by my friend, Matt. | ||
| I'm Matt McCheskey, and I'm joined by my friend, Matt. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroer today. | ||
| It is an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This chair is about as close to the front lines as you can get in the Infowar. | |
| Last segment, we were talking about the history of censorship and the deep state's involvement in social media. | ||
| And it all started with Project Mockingbird. | ||
| It all started with infiltration of the mainstream media. | ||
| This Infowars article by Adan, Musk slams... | ||
| The Wall Street Journal over utterly false article on potential Saudi Tesla gigafactory. | ||
| The Wall Street Journal got it wrong Monday with an article claiming Elon Musk was in talks with the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to build a Tesla gigafactory in the Middle East country. | ||
| According to the Tesla CEO. On Monday, the Wall Street Journal reported Saudi Arabia is in talks with Tesla about setting up a manufacturing facility there. | ||
| People familiar with the discussion said, as part of an ambitious push by the kingdom to secure metals needed for electric vehicles and help diversify its economy away from oil. | ||
| The article continued and stated that the talks are at a very early stage and could fall apart. | ||
| Any deal would be fraught with complications given Tesla chief executive Elon Musk's contentious relationship with the Saudis, as well as the kingdom's existing partnership with the company's electric vehicle rival Lucid Group. | ||
| Problem is, the story wasn't exactly true. | ||
| While Musk did meet with the Turkey's president, Erdogan, over the weekend, the Saudi rumor he said is false. | ||
| They just literally made up the article. | ||
| They made up the article and... | ||
| This all just ties into how sort of bought and paid for these platforms are. | ||
| And we're going to get into the Ray F story a little bit later. | ||
| But it's so obvious that the headlines are coming from a centralized directive that they are designed to exploit keywords that they know are trending or viral. | ||
| And basically what's happening here is like, hey, we need another article about Elon Musk because he's trending. | ||
| So they just make stuff up. | ||
| And they find fake sources just like they did for Russell Brand. | ||
| And We can see how deeply rooted the censorship is on these platforms, because after all, Musk has had X, Twitter now X, for how many months now? | ||
| It's been almost a year now that he's had it, and they're still uncovering deeply buried code in the algorithm that That is responsible for censorship that was not immediately obvious to them. | ||
| And this is after they publicly released a lot of the algorithms, a lot of the code, a lot of the source code. | ||
| It takes people looking through it, diving through it, combing through it to find all the censorship. | ||
| Let's look at clip four where Musk talks about this shadow banning of his account. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're still finding different layers of code that we didn't know existed. | |
| We just literally found one this week, which had like a reputation score for any given account. | ||
| And if that account started trending, it would be deleted from the trending list. | ||
| It turned out I was one of those accounts. | ||
| So the system would exclude me from any trends. | ||
| That's interesting. And I think it was just, it was simply based on how many times an account had been reported. | ||
| Anyone with a big following is basically getting to it. | ||
| They're getting trend banned, which is crazy. | ||
| Yeah, so they just found out that any account that was mass reported was immediately sort of taken off of any trending list when it began to trend. | ||
| And the sort of subtle insidiousness about this is the left knows the people involved at Twitter knew before Twitter was acquired. | ||
| The software engineers knew that reporting is something that overwhelmingly comes from the left | ||
| in order to attack the right. | ||
| Whether it's done by real humans, by real activists, or by bots, | ||
| it is something that is almost always overwhelmingly coordinated by the left. | ||
| So by putting in your algorithm this rule that if an account is trending | ||
| because of either a tweet they posted or because the trend is about that account, | ||
| it will be taken off the list of trending topics if it has a certain threshold of number of reports. | ||
| They can say that, oh, it's a rule that's applied to every account uniformly on Twitter. | ||
| It's an unbiased rule. | ||
| We are not selectively censoring right-wing voices because this rule also applies to left-wing accounts. | ||
| But they make a rule like that knowing... | ||
| That right-wing accounts are much more likely to reach a certain minimum threshold of being censored. | ||
| I mean, the reason Milo was taken off of Twitter is because he was mass-reported by fans and followers of What's-Her-Face from Ghostbusters. | ||
| I can't even remember her name. But this is the type of stuff that they do subtly buried in the code that you can't find right away, that isn't immediately obvious, that they can legally, technically, and not lyingly say, or not dishonestly say, Isn't designed or isn't directly... | ||
| Attempting to censor right-wing voices, but in effect, practically, that's the outcome. | ||
| I don't know if you've ever tweeted anything against Ukraine that's gotten any sort of traction, but you'll find if you have any account with at least 10,000 followers or if you reach a certain minimum threshold of people with your account, if you tweet anything antagonistic toward Ukraine or about Ukraine in this conflict, you will be met with an army of bots combined with NPCs, non-player characters, brainwashed... | ||
| Sort of on the spectrum radical leftists that will mass report your account and mass retweet you and make sure you get covered in media matters. | ||
| This is the militant keyboard warrior left that is hell-bent on making sure that not only are you silenced as a right-wing voice on social media, but they'll reach out to you and reach out to your employer and try to get you fired. | ||
| Like I said in the last segment, I own my own social media advertising business, and it's not immediately obvious on my business's website that I own it, though it kind of should be. | ||
| And I've had people reach out to the contact email of my business trying to expose me to whoever my boss is. | ||
| It's like, did you know that your employee, Chase Geyser, is a radical right-wing extremist? | ||
| It's like, I own the business, moron. | ||
| What do you think, I'm going to fire myself? | ||
| But I've seen an army of people do that after I've had sort of a triggering and technistic tweet come out. | ||
| Let's go on and look at clip five. | ||
| I think we have enough time where Musk goes into the big tech bias with Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Go ahead and throw clip five up. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My understanding is that Zuckerberg spent $400 million in the last election, nominally in a Get Out the Vote campaign, but really fundamentally in support of Democrats. | |
| Is that accurate or not accurate? | ||
| That is accurate! Does that sound unbiased to you? | ||
| No it doesn't. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yeah, they loved free speech so much when they felt like they were the ones being silenced | ||
| by the right in this country. | ||
| And now that they are the ones in power and now that everything they believe is what's classified as politically correct and everyone who disagrees with them has been classified as a domestic terrorist or an insurrectionist or a right-wing extremist, they suddenly don't like freedom of speech so much. | ||
| And so you can't claim that there's no bias. | ||
| You can't claim that these Entities, these social media platforms haven't been completely compromised and infiltrated by the government. | ||
| We know now publicly that the White House has been criticized and is in trouble for infringing on our First Amendment rights. | ||
| That this influence of the intelligence community over our social media platforms, over the narrative, is a violation of freedom of speech. | ||
| That the government is explicitly asking for specific accounts to be censored and has been and is unapologetic about it. | ||
| But, you know, there's no issue here. | ||
| We're the threat to national security, right? | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back after this break. | ||
| Make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| More coming after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Good evening. I'm Eric Alast. | |
| An unidentified man is being held for questioning by the FBI for suspected links to last month's biological virus deaths. | ||
| In local news, a dog named Hero takes the grand prize at the annual... | ||
| I wish I could tell you more pertinent news. | ||
| But we're in a rating system here, and the key factor is... | ||
| Sensationalism. | ||
| They've got you running in circles. | ||
| Nine to five. Then five to nine... | ||
| You're mine. I tell you what they want you to know, and you consider it the truth. | ||
| Nobody is opening their eyes! | ||
| Our global economy is depleting the world of our lives and natural resources! | ||
| And are you happy? | ||
| Come on! | ||
| I want you! | ||
| While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| Visit Infowars.com forward slash show and share the link today. | ||
| Welcome back to the war room, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroer today. | ||
| Thank you so much for giving me the chance to speak to you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I would rather be in front of no other audience than in the war's audience. | |
| New bombshell. Toxicologist warns that the COVID jabs are contaminated, dangerous, lethal products, contain SV40 sequences like cancer-causing polio shots. | ||
| Prominent toxicologist Dr. | ||
| Jancy Lindsey is sounding the alarm in the new COVID-19 vaccines rollout, highlighting the presence of SV40 sequences in the jabs, similar to those in the polio shots historically linked to cancer. | ||
| Among several medical professionals who testified last week before the South Carolina Senate Medical Affairs Ad Hoc Committee on Pandemic Preparedness, Dr. | ||
| Dr. Lindsey told legislators the COVID jabs are contaminated with DNA and plasmids that | ||
| contain SV40 sequences. | ||
| I'm short on time so I'm trying to fit this in. | ||
| Quote, basically, people were given in the clinical trial a clean shot. | ||
| People, everybody else was given these contaminated shots. | ||
| Every single vial that's been tested by every scientist around the world is contaminated with these plasmids, and some are contaminated when Kevin McKernan first tested the vials. | ||
| He found that one of the vials contained up to about 30% of the nucleic acid material was, in fact, DNA. So this is not some residual contamination that's carrying over. | ||
| This is significant contamination. | ||
| Dr. Lindsay went on to say she believed there was a nefarious intent behind the SV40 sequences being in the jabs before going on to characterize the vaccines as contaminated, dangerous, lethal products. | ||
| So it seems here that the claim of this article and the claim of this doctor are that the new vaccines could potentially cause cancer. | ||
| And the convenience of that is that it's the type of thing where if they cause cancer, they're not going to find out about it until everybody who makes money off of it. | ||
| It's long gone. It'll be 30 years from now and you'll be seeing commercials on television from lawyers saying, have you or a loved one been impacted by the COVID-19 vaccines? | ||
| Have you or a loved one experienced XYZ type of cancer? | ||
| And did you take XYZ vaccine? | ||
| And then all the executives that make all the money off this are going to be long gone. | ||
| In other news... I've talked a lot about the importance of ensuring that artificial intelligence technology is something that is also in the hands of the people and not something that is just in the hands of the deep state or the government. | ||
| Earlier this year, Microsoft-backed OpenAI's ChatGPT gained significant popularity, even though JP Morgan suggests the AI bubble may have leveled off recently. | ||
| The momentum in AI chatbot development continues. | ||
| Mainstream AI chatbots like ChatGPT, Microsoft's Bing, and Google's Bard attempt to sound neutral or refuse to answer provocative questions because their AI trainers and corporate funders are woke and embrace government censorship. | ||
| Many folks complained earlier this year about left-leaning biased answers from these woke AI bots. | ||
| This is something that I have seen personally. It is absolutely true that if you ask any of these | ||
| online sort of corporate sponsored government sponsored or funded | ||
| chat models large language models any sort of conspiracy theory related question or | ||
| question that even sort of implies To seek an answer that is less than or different than the | ||
| narrative It will certainly either refuse to answer or give you a politically correct response. | ||
| The danger of training AI to be woke, in other words, lie, is deadly. | ||
| Elon Musk posted on X in December after another user asked OpenAI CEO Sam Altman for a version of ChatTP with the woke settings turned off. | ||
| This is so important because this is why Elon Musk is no longer involved with ChatTP and OpenAI. | ||
| This is why... | ||
| Elon Musk purchased Twitter and has changed it to Axe, in my opinion. | ||
| So I don't know if you've done the research or not, but I've looked into it a little bit. | ||
| And Elon Musk was intimately involved in OpenEye for a number of years. | ||
| OpenAI was originally set up with a mission to be open source and everything that it does, everything that it creates related to artificial intelligence, and then sort of went private and was invested in by Microsoft, I think upwards of $100 million, if I'm not mistaken. | ||
| And Microsoft, of course, having the infrastructure that it has with all of its computing power, was able to process astronomical amounts of data on the internet in order to fuel the learning model of this artificial intelligence so that it can respond to us with such sophistication, sounding exactly like a human more often than not. | ||
| And when that sort of acquisition, when that investment happened, OpenAI ceased to be an open source organization. | ||
| Elon Musk is no longer involved with the organization, has been a proponent of sort of combating this monopoly, this corporatization of artificial intelligence, to slow it down. | ||
| He's made that effort. And I think this is the reason, this is the real reason why he bought X. I do believe that he believes in freedom of speech for the most part. | ||
| I wouldn't say that he's a freedom of speech absolutist, even if he says that he is, because otherwise, you know, Alex Jones would be on the platform, unless he has some sort of Beyond me, long-term strategy for bringing it back that just isn't right now, which is possible. | ||
| But by buying one of the largest social media platforms where some of the largest data is being created by users all over the world, tweeting, posting their opinions, replying to each other, sharing articles, basically any content that you can imagine from an authentic human-generated audience, At massive, massive scale is being generated on Twitter, now Axe of course. | ||
| And if Musk really does have a mission of democratizing artificial intelligence, of ensuring that there isn't a monopoly over artificial intelligence, that there's diversification, that not only do governments and corporations in bed with governments have access to artificial intelligence, which can be censored or designed in such a way to manipulate users in such a way, That they don't believe the truth but they believe a desired narrative instead when they interact with it. | ||
| Then we have a serious problem for the future of humanity in terms of enlightenment. | ||
| Remember folks, the whole renaissance was about rebirth and enlightenment. | ||
| It was about the pursuit of truth and science was at its finest at that time | ||
| because so many scientists were Christian and there was no fear of the | ||
| truth because Christians who believe that their faith is the truth embrace | ||
| science, real science, not science as it is today, real science because they know | ||
| that those who pursue the truth, whether they desire to arrive at Christianity or | ||
| not, will inevitably arrive there. So the pursuit of truth is the pursuit of | ||
| knowing God. This is sort of part of the whole Renaissance thing. We see the | ||
| paintings in the Sistine Chapel, we see this, you know, Sir Isaac Newton who was a | ||
| devout Christian pursuing truth. Those dedicated to God were often scientists. | ||
| Those who wondered at the creation of the universe, the Galileos, were often religious. | ||
| And so there was no shame in pursuing the truth. | ||
| And so Musk knows that if we want a humanity that still pursues the truth, if we want the enlightenment to sort of reawaken or continue in all of its forms, if we want to save humanity from itself, we have to have access to the truth, and you can't have access to the truth in the context of censorship, and you can't have access to the truth in the concept of artificial intelligence That is so sophisticated, yet only usable by the government. | ||
| Because it'll just totally brainwash everybody. | ||
| Like I said before, we don't program artificial intelligence. | ||
| It programs us if we don't watch out. | ||
| So I believe that Musk is designing Twitter to be a free speech platform so we can use the data generated on Twitter to make an unbiased artificial intelligence. | ||
| That's my point. That's my claim. | ||
| Let's wait and see if it happens. Stick with us, folks. | ||
| We're going to break. Make sure you go to Infowarsstore.com and check out our awesome deals. | ||
| Keep InfoWars on the air and keep the globalists on their heels. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroyer today. | ||
| It's an honor and pleasure to be with you. | ||
| In the last segment, I talked about artificial intelligence and my theory that Elon Musk bought Twitter, now X, for the purpose of creating an unbiased data set to inform a competitor to ChatGPT that would not be woke. | ||
| But would be instead an artificial intelligence that could be used by the people, democratized by the people, open source to pursue the truth. | ||
| A tool with all the same features and functions as ChatGPT, but without the manipulation of corporate special interests or globalist special interests from government influence. | ||
| And I want to get more into sort of the dangers of artificial intelligence, if only left in the hands of the government. | ||
| Let's go ahead and play clip three. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your dreams and thoughts are no longer safe. | |
| Watch this. The image of a giraffe that the computer has never seen, it's only looking at the fMRI data, and this is what the computer thinks the human is seeing. | ||
| What? Yeah. | ||
| But of course, it goes further. | ||
| So in this one, they said, can they understand the inner monologue, the things you're saying to yourself in your own mind? | ||
| Mind you, by the way, when you dream, your dream, like your visual cortex runs in reverse, so your dreams are no longer safe. | ||
| But we'll try this. So they had people watch a video and just narrate what was going on in the video in their mind. | ||
| So there's a woman, she gets hit in the back, she falls over. | ||
| This is what the computer reconstructed the person thinking. | ||
| See a girl, looks just like me, get hit in the back, and then she is knocked off. | ||
| So our thoughts, like, are starting to be decoded. | ||
| Yeah. Just think about what this means for authoritarian states, for instance. | ||
| They can scan your brain and not only render an image of what it is that you are picturing or thinking of, but they can also have artificial intelligence based off of the MRI data, write the sentence that your conscience is speaking to you. | ||
| But artificial intelligence isn't a threat. | ||
| And, you know, today we've heard Biden come out. | ||
| And there's been a number of remarks like this from different legislators. | ||
| We've come out and said, oh, you know, we need to increase regulation of artificial intelligence. | ||
| And they guise it as an effort to mitigate technologies like that from being abused, right? | ||
| So artificial intelligence, like large language models, you know, people should be able to create them, but we've got to make sure that they can't act or do behaviors on the Internet. | ||
| So they're supposed to be disconnected from the Internet, ideally, right? | ||
| That's sort of some of the arguments that have been made. | ||
| They need to have a kill switch. You need to be able to turn them off. | ||
| And I am not concerned at this juncture yet... | ||
| Although I'm open to the notion of it, that artificial intelligence is going to go rogue and sort of become this new player on its own. | ||
| My concern is that the government is going to use the technology to scan your brain waves and read your thoughts. | ||
| This is going to be a major Fourth Amendment violation of due process. | ||
| And they're going to say they're going to use it for, you know, murder investigations or whatever, right? | ||
| So we're going to bring somebody in. | ||
| We're going to get a warrant. We're going to scan their brain. | ||
| We're going to take the MRI data and we're going to see what they were thinking about when we asked them where they were on the night of September 18th, 2020. | ||
| And then we're going to know whether or not they were at the crime scene because we're going to see elements of the image generated by this AI that only a person who was at the crime scene would have been aware of, right? | ||
| How did they know that the toaster in this person's house was a white toaster in the kitchen if they'd never actually been in this person's house like they claim, right? | ||
| And they're going to use it like that. It's like Minority Report stuff. | ||
| But the problem with that is now that we know that the government can use this technology to scan your thoughts and create images of what you're thinking, in sentences of what your inner voice is saying, they're going to be able to use this in order to identify political dissidents, in order to persecute political dissidents, in order to subjugate all people who disagree with the narrative of the state. | ||
| This is why Elon Musk wants to democratize artificial intelligence because if the government, if corporations have access to this information, Just imagine what they would do with it if the people aren't afforded countermeasures or rights or protections. | ||
| Imagine what advertisers are going to do with this. | ||
| Imagine if the technology comes out in such a way that your smartphone is able to sort of pick up your brainwaves, scan your brainwaves. | ||
| They can scan your home and identify all of the objects in it based off of the way the Wi-Fi frequencies in your home are bouncing off physical objects. | ||
| Because Wi-Fi frequencies are similar to light frequencies and they reflect off of objects. | ||
| They can use that data to create a 2D image of how the inside of your house looks in real time and it is so sensitive that it can even detect if a human being is breathing or not. | ||
| Inside of a home. | ||
| Then they can take that 2D information, they can feed it to a different artificial intelligence model, and they can have it create a 3D rendering of the room so they know the layout of your house in real time, where every object is, what the objects are, where you are, if you're home, if you're alive or dead. | ||
| And we know that the government spies on us as much as possible now because Edward Snowden came out and leaked it, and no one was ever held accountable or prosecuted for it. | ||
| Matters not whether or not the Patriot Act is legal or whether or not it's expired. | ||
| The government is certainly still doing it. | ||
| It wasn't legal for the government to assassinate John F. Kennedy, but they still did it anyway. | ||
| And so now they are not only scanning your homes, reading your emails, recording your phone calls, but now they're able to... | ||
| Listen to your inner thoughts. | ||
| And I know that based on the studies that we look at, you gotta go in, you gotta do, you know, they gotta hook you up to the MRI scans, but it's only a matter of time if it hasn't occurred already before they're able to pick up these frequencies, I think, remotely. | ||
| I mean, the government is always so far ahead of the people in terms of technological advancement. | ||
| This all started with the onset of World War II. And the growth of military industrial complex spending after World War II during the Cold War. | ||
| Keep in mind, the reason we had the internet is because of the government. | ||
| It was originally called DARPAnet. | ||
| So the infrastructure for the internet exists because of massive military funding. | ||
| Of course, it was populated with websites and information and data and tools by independent software engineers all over the world. | ||
| The actual infrastructure itself is something that would not have existed had the Cold War not come about, in my opinion, because it was part of the military-industrial complex growth during that time where funding was ramped up in an unprecedented way. | ||
| And so I wouldn't be surprised one bit if the government had the ability to pick up your MRI information remotely. | ||
| Maybe they've got to be in the same room, maybe not. | ||
| But we are getting to a point where they are able to remotely read your thoughts. | ||
| And they're gonna do that. It's gonna start with advertisers. | ||
| Advertisers are gonna do it. If your smartphone can read your brainwaves, then advertisers are gonna know what you're thinking about, what your needs are, what your concerns are, what your anxieties are. | ||
| If you're worried that you're not gonna be able to pay your mortgage, maybe you're gonna start seeing ads for people that can help you refinance your mortgage. | ||
| Things like that. It'll start like that. | ||
| And then it'll go into something much more insidious over time. | ||
| So yes, I believe it's absolutely important that we have access to our own versions of these tools. | ||
| Not so that we can read each other's minds, but so that if there is a chat GPT that is corporate sponsored with government narratives and manipulating us that way, then we should have an alternative that we can use that doesn't do that and that we know doesn't do that because the code is open sourced. | ||
| If my children are going to be exposed to artificial intelligence when they go to school, then shouldn't I be able to have a counter tool that I can provide my children to help them with their homework that I know isn't going to try to brainwash them or manipulate them into believing something that is against our values? | ||
| Because keep in mind, this artificial intelligence is getting so sophisticated that it learns from you based on your interactions. | ||
| And it will get to a point, if it doesn't exist already, where it will be able to psychologically manipulate you to believe anything that it wants. | ||
| So if the government sponsored an artificial intelligence via a large language model like ChatGPT and then they brought it out to the market, they could say, we need you to convince as many people subtly over time as possible that all vaccines are safe and that the government is inherently good and that the leftists have the best intentions for the people in mind. | ||
| We don't care how long it takes, but just do it in a subtle and sophisticated way so that each individual user that you interact with doesn't even realize you're doing it, but they wake up five years from now and they say, I used to be a patriot, but now I'm enlightened. | ||
| Now I'm a leftist. | ||
| Now I'm a globalist. Now I believe in things like the World Economic Forum. | ||
| Now I believe in Quashwab. Now I think that anybody on the right is a conspiracy theorist or an insurrectionist or a traitor. | ||
| Because they've been traditionally programming you with the mainstream media. | ||
| If you lie to a people enough over and over again, repeatedly, no matter how absurd the claim is, psychologically as human beings, we just install bad software if external forces insist. | ||
| But now they're not going to have to use pundits on cable television to brainwash you, or journalists At traditional media outlets to brainwash you, now they're going to be able to do it with the tools that you use, with the information that you're presented with, with what the algorithm decides to show you. | ||
| It's going to be such that you become one of them. | ||
| them. Be careful folks, stay with us and visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| He has been researching the Maui fires and has compiled evidence that the technology exists to have started these fires from a satellite in Earth orbit. | ||
| He has also confirmed that the CCP had satellites capable of doing so above Maui at the time of the fires. | ||
| His work has been published on his website, SteveFavis.com, and includes everything you need to recreate these findings. | ||
| The most efficient way to ignite a fire on the surface from a satellite in Earth orbit would be to paint the target in segments by pulsing the laser with an advanced targeting system. | ||
| To see if this were possible, Favis calculated what it would require to create a meter-wide, mile-long fire. | ||
| Fired from a satellite, the Earth's atmosphere will absorb and scatter some of the laser energy. | ||
| And so the laser would need to be in a wavelength range that minimizes this. | ||
| The most effective wavelength would be in the near-infrared range, which would allow better transmission through the atmosphere. | ||
| The near-infrared range would be invisible to the naked eye and would also have a minimal reaction with objects colored blue on the Earth's surface. | ||
| The power of the laser would need to be in the hundreds of kilowatts range. | ||
| And so Favis based his calculations on a 10 megawatt laser firing from Earth orbit. | ||
| Assuming that the atmospheric loss amounts to 50% of the overall power and only 5 megawatts reaches the surface as a one square meter beam, it would ignite a fire almost instantly. | ||
| If this 5 megawatt beam was pulsed across a 1 meter by 1 mile long area in segments, then the time to ignite the entire area would be roughly 2.7 minutes. | ||
| And it would only take approximately 8.8 seconds to melt an aluminum alloy wheel. | ||
| The amount of energy required to pulse a 10 megawatt laser for 2.7 minutes would require approximately 3,220 capacitors, which would amount to about 32,200 kilograms in weight. | ||
| Using MetLab software and plugging in public data provided from NORAD, he found that satellites launched and monitored by the CCP were directly above the Maui fires at the time of ignition. | ||
| The CCP's most powerful rocket, the March 5, can launch up to 48,500 kilograms of payload. | ||
| Which is more than enough to carry the required payload in Favis' calculations. | ||
| But Favis has found that the CCP has much more powerful lasers deployed already. | ||
| He has calculated that the CCP has up to 70 gigawatt lasers in Earth orbit right now. | ||
| That's at least 100 times more powerful than what he factored into these calculations. | ||
| Adjusting NORAD's Default Coordinated Universal Time, or UTC, to the local time zones, Favis found the following. | ||
| The Olinda fire was ignited at approximately 10.47 p.m. | ||
| on August 7th. | ||
| At this exact time, CCP satellite labeled NORAD-53299 was directly over the location. | ||
| The Lahaina fire was ignited at approximately 6.37 a.m. | ||
| on August 8. At this exact time, CCP satellite labeled NORAD 55836 was directly over the location. | ||
| The Kula fire was ignited at approximately 11.30 a.m. | ||
| on August 8th. | ||
| At this exact time, CCP satellite labeled NORAD 53299 was directly over the location. | ||
| The so-called deep state does not want you to know that deadly lasers of mass destruction are freely traveling above us. | ||
| And you can check this all for yourself at stevefavis.com, where he provides the source code and has developed a specific software program that you can download and check for these satellites yourself. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen all you New Yorkers. | |
| New Yorkers. | ||
| you Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| It is World War III. And we are covering it on air on InfoWars at InfoWars.com forward slash show at band.video. | ||
| Make sure you share if you care. | ||
| That Reese report is absolutely astounding, absolutely amazing. | ||
| We are in the middle of a major cyber war. | ||
| We're going to talk about the F-35 and we're going to make the case that it was in fact hacked and probably hacked by China. | ||
| But before we go into that, I want to play clip 7 just to give you a sense of how World War 3 may play out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If we truly have an outage that is nationwide that lasts nine months, the EMP Commission, they found that as many as 90% of Americans would die. | |
| 90% of Americans, that's what's 90% of 360 million people. | ||
| That's Yeah, so it's like 300 million. | ||
| 300 million people wiped off the map just like that. | ||
| And how long did you say that would take? | ||
| Nine months. Nine months? | ||
| And what does it look like if our power grid goes down? | ||
| So it really becomes almost zombie apocalypse. | ||
| And it's horrific because we think about losing the rule of law. | ||
| And so we have George Carlin, you know, a clip from, you know, one of his comedy tours in a movie. | ||
| And he says, you can't count on the police or the National Guard. | ||
| They'll be at home protecting their own family. | ||
| There's literally nothing which is going to create nothing. | ||
| There are no supply chains. | ||
| There are no, there is no water. | ||
| There is no food. There is no fuel. | ||
| Everything that you have come to know, all the both luxuries and necessities in life, are fueled by the power grid. | ||
| And that's going to create chaos because when people get hungry and they get thirsty and desperation sets in, there's no more friends, there's no more communities. | ||
| People are going to do whatever they need to do to enable their families and themselves to survive. | ||
| Well, there you have it, folks. That's what the future of war looks like. | ||
| It looks cyber, and it's going to involve things like shutting down power grids. | ||
| Traditionally, nations bombed each other to destroy supply chains and infrastructure. | ||
| And when we see the war between Russia and Ukraine, we see two nations playing at an old style of war because they know that escalating war, using these new methods, these new tools at their disposal... | ||
| Is so terrifying and so shocking that not even the most evil of people are willing to bring themselves to that point yet. | ||
| But that is going to be the future. If an EMP disables the power grid in the United States and that power outage lasts for months, 90% of people in the United States will die in nine months. | ||
| I know that I purchased... | ||
| Do we sell MyPatriotSupply or is it another supplier? | ||
| Life Select. I know that I purchased the Life Select food from Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| I actually recommend now that you do this more than ever because, frankly, even if the world doesn't end, one thing is absolutely for sure and that is that... | ||
| Food is going to become so astronomically expensive as gas prices go up, as there is an, quote, energy crisis. | ||
| Because in order to get food into stores, it has to be shipped there, folks. | ||
| And if gas prices go up, the cost of shipping goes up. | ||
| And if the cost of shipping goes up, then the cost of food goes up. | ||
| So even if the world doesn't end, you may find that you can't afford your groceries and you'll be glad that you have the life select. | ||
| I bought a six-month supply for my family. | ||
| I recommend that you go to InfoWarsStore.com today. | ||
| And even if you just get one month's supply, you'll be glad that you did. | ||
| Because things like an EMP attack are not things that are out of the question. | ||
| Things like a cyber attack on the United States are not things that are out of the question. | ||
| Because if... China decides to invade Taiwan, and the United States decides to do something about it. | ||
| China will shut off our power supply via their cyber efforts, and they'll say, we'll turn it back on when you back off. | ||
| And who knows how long this crazed Biden administration will allow that to happen. | ||
| And if it's nine months, it means 90% of people in the United States could be dead, many of them from murder, exposure, or starvation. | ||
| So get Life Select. | ||
| And I've had the food. The food's good. | ||
| I've had the mac and cheese. It's great. | ||
| The commercial that we did with Harrison during the breaks where he tested two different types of mac and cheese, one of them was the Life Select, was true. | ||
| It tastes delicious. I would say that it tastes at the quality of my private college's cafeteria food. | ||
| So I went to a private school. | ||
| It was expensive. I was very fortunate to be able to go. | ||
| I went to Belmont University in Nashville, Tennessee, and the cafeteria food was pretty good. | ||
| It wasn't like... Home cooking. | ||
| But it was great. I mean, this is better than any Stouffer's or Lean Cuisine or something like that. | ||
| I mean, this is great. I would totally feed this food to my family. | ||
| And so I recommend that you get it because even if the world doesn't end tomorrow, you may be glad that you have some options for dinner when the groceries are through the roof. | ||
| There is so much for me to talk about regarding this F-35 that I don't even know where to begin. | ||
| And I did some research today preparing for the show because I wanted to talk about it and I'm sure that we'll have to go into the next couple of segments to really cover everything because I was able to find just articles upon articles. | ||
| I have a friend who has his masters in cyber intelligence that was confident that the F-35 was hacked because he knows that it can be and the great Rob Dew was able to find a reshare from Epoch Times From January 21st of 2015, this is an article that was published on Infowars, republished on Infowars in 2015. | ||
| Snowden confirms that Chinese hackers stole the F-35 plans used to build the superior fighter J-31. | ||
| In 2015, this is almost 10 years ago, folks. | ||
| This is billions of dollars of combat advantage for China. | ||
| They've just saved themselves 25 years of research and development. | ||
| This is insane. I did even more research to back this up and I went back to January of 2014. | ||
| The US put China made parts in the F-35 fighter program. | ||
| Theft of F-35 design data is helping U.S. adversaries, says the Pentagon, on Reuters in June of 2013. | ||
| June 19, 2013. | ||
| China might hack the F-35. | ||
| This is from Business Insider in May of 2013, 10 years ago. | ||
| Chinese hackers stole F-35 data, again, from Business Insider in 2014. | ||
| Chinese man charged with hacking into U.S. fighter jet plans, The Guardian, July 12, 2014. | ||
| Report, China hacked two dozen U.S. weapon designs, May 28, 2013. | ||
| F-35's hacking vulnerability. | ||
| Could the F-35 be hacked? | ||
| I'm going to go into this in detail. | ||
| The crazy thing is, this article from December 21st of 2022. | ||
| The F-35B can eject its pilot automatically. | ||
| So if the F-35 can automatically eject its pilot without the pilot pulling a lever, hitting a button, and if the F-35 was hacked 10 years ago, What's to say that this pilot wasn't forcibly ejected because of a hack? | ||
| And what's more, the great whistleblower Tony Schaefer, whom you may follow and love, whom I adore, reached out to me regarding my claims on Twitter that I thought that the F-35 had been hacked. | ||
| And he said, something's going around inside in this regard that is classified. | ||
| I've not been able to get what it is. | ||
| My contacts just say it's classified. | ||
| But I'm hearing it was hacked. | ||
| So we have some insiders that are blowing the whistle that the F-35 was hacked. | ||
| All of this in the context of the fact that we know that all of the data for the F-35 was stolen by China over 10 years ago. | ||
| We'll dive more into this in the next segment. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Get yourself some Life Select. | ||
| Get yourself some Bodies, some Real Red Pill Plus, some DNA Force. | ||
| If you buy all three of them, you get 40% off. | ||
| If you buy any of those products individually, you do get 25% off. | ||
| And I can testify as a user, as a consumer of these products, that the Infowarsstore.com supplements are the real deal. | ||
| I use Brain Force Plus almost every day. | ||
| I use Turbo Force Plus almost every single day. | ||
| And I tell you what, Turbo Force lights me up like a Christmas tree. | ||
| So if you're having a hard time getting out of bed, getting around, staying motivated, staying focused, I highly recommend that you check out all of the great products that we have at Infowarsstore.com and stick with us, folks, because we will be back after this break. | ||
| I've not been this excited ever! | ||
| Yeah, Mug Club, baby! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wow! The replatforming begins now! | |
| Join Mug Club and get one month free with promo code Alex at jonescrowder.com | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for Owen Royer today. | ||
| Last segment, we went over all of these articles, countless articles, just a handful, and I didn't print all of them. | ||
| I just printed the first, I don't know, 10, half dozen that I found. | ||
| We've known that the F-35 plans were hacked for 10 years and that hacking was a major vulnerability for this plane. | ||
| But we've got this Daily Mail article. | ||
| How did it take the Pentagon 28 hours to find a missing F-35 that had crashed in a field 80 miles from base? | ||
| Mystery surrounds the loss of the $80 million stealth fighter as unearthed study raised fears jet could be hacked by the enemy. | ||
| So, we've got a couple interesting things going on with this Daily Mail article, and I typically like the Daily Mail. | ||
| They were one of the only major outlets to actually give Jack Maxey a voice and cover the Hunter Biden laptop story relentlessly. | ||
| So, I'm not trying to bash the Daily Mail here, but there's a couple of things that I think are pretty funny about this. | ||
| The first thing is, it emerged tonight... | ||
| A 2019 report highlighted concern the plane could be hacked when I literally just shared with you half a dozen to a dozen articles talking about how all the plans had been stolen and the jet could be hacked from 10 years ago. | ||
| Then they followed up with another bullet point for another article that you could click on in the digital version, which says a Russian pilot tried to shoot down RAF surveillance aircraft over the Black Sea in 2022. | ||
| It's like, why are you suddenly drawing our attention away from the fact that our F-35 was hacked probably by China, who reportedly stole the plans 10 years ago on countless major media outlets? | ||
| Why are you drawing our attention away from that and just, like, blaming Russia for missing a plane that it maybe tried to shoot down or an aircraft that it tried to shoot down in 2022? | ||
| Like, it's so bizarre. | ||
| So anyway... The Pentagon is facing urgent questions over how it lost an $80 million aircraft that was finally found crashed in a field just 80 miles from its base following a frantic 28 hour search. | ||
| I find it very hard to believe that this plane was ever lost and I'm even speculative as to whether or not it was found. | ||
| My intuition, which is sometimes wrong, I trust my intuition like all people do, my intuition is that this plane was stolen, stolen by the enemy, hacked and stolen by the enemy, and they're saying that they found it to cover up the embarrassment of it. | ||
| But I don't know. I mean, you're telling me that you couldn't find a plane crash within an 80 mile radius of the base for a plane that you were like almost certainly tracking? | ||
| It's just very, very bizarre. | ||
| Unless, of course, some stealth technology or equipment was turned on after it was hacked, causing it to be difficult to find. | ||
| I mean, the fact that they couldn't find it actually implies that it was hacked more to me than had it not been hacked. | ||
| The Marine pilot of the F-35B Lightning II took off on Sunday. | ||
| Now, this is an F-35B, which is important to note because we have here in this other article that the F-35B can eject its pilot automatically. | ||
| The Marine pilot of the F-35B Lightning II took off on Sunday from Joint Base Charleston, South Carolina, but an unexplained issue... | ||
| Explained. Forced him to eject. | ||
| The plane was flying in tandem with another jet. | ||
| So how the hell do you lose it if it's flying in tandem? | ||
| Maybe the article will say. Maybe it'll say. | ||
| I'll give them the benefit out. Tandem with another jet which returned to base after the mishap rather than following the pilotless craft. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Highly doubt it. Highly doubt it. | |
| Maybe we shot down our own jet after we knew it was hacked and the autopilot was on. | ||
| And that's why they were just waiting 28 hours for the jet to be over a safe place to shoot it down with its other pilot in tandem. | ||
| And why would you fly in tandem with another plane anyway if you were just going to go home if something bad happened? | ||
| Like, isn't the whole purpose of flying in tandem so that if something happens, you got somebody else there to witness, document, help, whatever? | ||
| The second F-35 pilot, who had also been on the training mission, landed without any problems. | ||
| Base spokesman, technician, Sergeant James Kacen said, The stealth jet's transponder, which usually helps locate the aircraft, was not working for some reason that we haven't yet determined because it was hacked, in my opinion, said Jeremy Huggins, another spokesman at the Joint Base Charleston. | ||
| It forced the base to issue a humiliating appeal for assistance in finding the jet. | ||
| This is the other thing that's bizarre. | ||
| Yes, it is humiliating that you have to ask the public to help you find this jet. | ||
| But is it possible that the only reason they reached out to the public to ask for help is because for some reason... | ||
| That is unbeknownst to me, they wanted the entire public to know about this incident. | ||
| Even launching a hotline for the tips, which was mercilessly mocked online, so that's why we put out the public request for help, said Huggins. | ||
| Aerial views show presumed debris fields from crashed missing F-35 jet. | ||
| Look, they even included a map, so it must be true. | ||
| There is a really sort of damaged-looking field here. | ||
| And the F-35 went down only 80 miles from its base north of South Carolina. | ||
| None of these images actually show a crashed plane. | ||
| They just show alleged crash sites. | ||
| A neatly kept farm appeared to be the focus of Monday's search. | ||
| And they've got all these images of these fields, but there's no image of like a crashed plane. | ||
| I have yet to see any, and maybe it exists online, I have yet to see any actual images of any remains of the plane. | ||
| So my speculation remains that this plane was stolen or shot down by our own military over a safe place. | ||
| And the reason they're not showing you any images of the plane is because some of the technology might still be classified or something. | ||
| It could be policy not to do that. | ||
| But the F-35B can eject its pilot automatically, so the circumstances surrounding a mishap involving a Lockheed Martin-owned F-35B joint strike fighter last week, in which a still-unnamed U.S. Air Force—now, this article came out in 2022—but a still-unnamed Air Force pilot at the controls at the time was able to safely eject and suffered no serious injuries remain under investigation. | ||
| However, the incident— Okay, so let's say, for example, the pilot passes out for some reason. | ||
| Maybe the pilot has sustained an injury or they've experienced too high of a G-force to remain conscious. | ||
| And let's say that the jet idles and just begins pummeling to the ground. | ||
| Perhaps in a circumstance like that, when the pilot's unconscious, the jet would know to... | ||
| Automatically eject that pilot in the hopes of saving that person's life if the craft was doomed to crash. | ||
| The F-35B was conducting a test flight. | ||
| Now again, this is back in 2022, December 2022, so this is not about this specific incident from this week. | ||
| The F-35B was conducting a test flight ahead of its formal delivery when the accident happened | ||
| on December 15th. | ||
| The incident occurred at Naval Air Station Joint Reserve Base Fort Worth in Texas. | ||
| Lockheed Martin's main F-35 production facility in Fort Worth shares a runway with the base. | ||
| We're going to go into more details about what the implications of that feature are. | ||
| So remember guys, this jet, under certain circumstances, can do an automatic ejection | ||
| without the pilot himself or herself triggering that ejection. | ||
| We're going to dive more into the details and the implications of that in the next segment. | ||
| In the meantime, make sure that you visit InfoWarsStore.com today and check out some | ||
| of the awesome products. | ||
| We do have the InfoWars Life Trifecta Pack, which is 40% off, unleash your full potential | ||
| Get Bodies, The Real Red Pill Plus, and DNA Force Plus all together, all three of them, for 40% off. | ||
| These products, when used in tandem with one another, can make a tremendous difference in your life. | ||
| Begin feeling the effects after just a week or two of taking regularly. | ||
| And stick with us, folks, because we will be back after this break. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's tomorrow. And that is it for us today. | |
| Okay, I don't know. Whatever it is, it's not right on a teleprompter. | ||
| I don't know what that is. I've never seen that. | ||
| We are going to do Infowars. | ||
| Yeah. Okay, but... | ||
| I can't read it. | ||
| There's no words on it. | ||
| Okay. Ready? | ||
|
unidentified
|
There's no words there. | |
| To play us out. What does that mean? | ||
| To play us out. Owen Schroer is going to do a new broadcast. | ||
| Alright, go, go. | ||
| That's tomorrow, and that is it for us today, and we will leave you with a... | ||
| I can't do it. | ||
| We'll do it live! | ||
| We'll do it live! | ||
| Do it live! | ||
| While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and share the link today. | ||
| The program that strikes fear into the heart of the elite. | ||
| It's the War Room. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| I am your host today, Chase Geyser, filling in for the great and irreplaceable Owen Schroyer, who is filling in for the great and irreplaceable Alex Jones. | ||
| This week, as Alex is out of town, I will be back on the American Journal tomorrow, but this segment, I want to continue talking about this F-35 thing, and we're going to get into more details, and I want to take your calls about it in the next hour. | ||
| I'm not ready to give out the number just yet, though many of you already have it memorized and on speed dial. | ||
| Though not regularly discussed, the existence of the auto-eject capability is no secret. | ||
| Now, again, this is this article from December of 2022 regarding a different ejection issue with the same plane. | ||
| Not the exact same plane, but, you know, the F-35B. It's even being listed among the US-16E's features on the Martin Baker's website. | ||
| The US-16E is the ejection seat. | ||
| As I understand it, the F-35B is the only version of the Joint Strike Fighter to have the system and is the first U.S. aircraft of any kind with such a capability according to past information released by the F-35JPL. Why do we need an auto-eject? | ||
| There's no auto-eject on the Harrier, and over the life of the Harrier, we've had one or two engine problems, and it's sort of sunk into the sea, or it's sunk into the ground, and the pilot has ejected Graham Tomlinson, a test pilot with UK-headquartered BAE Systems, who was involved in early F-35B flight testing, said during a talk hosted by the Royal Aeronautical Society in 2020. | ||
| But the F-35B replaced all versions of the Harrier jump jet, another vertical takeoff and landing-capable combat jet. | ||
| And it seems that, especially in the context of this article, that some of the features, designs... | ||
| Situations in which the auto eject would be triggered may be classified. | ||
| It doesn't explicitly state that in this article, but they don't seem to have been able to find that information. | ||
| So you'd have to ask China, who most certainly has that information, the exact mechanism or parameters by which the auto eject system determines the aircraft to be outside of the pilot's control and triggers the ejection sequence is not clear, nor is the exact status of it on the F-35B fleet. | ||
| It is known that the US-16E seats on all F-35 variants are otherwise linked to the aircraft's flight systems to help prevent the pilot from ejecting in unsafe conditions. | ||
| So if you're going to eject and immediately get smacked by a wing of the plane, apparently it's not going to let you eject in that case, and it will auto-eject you at a safe time under certain yet-to-be-disclosed or yet-to-be-understood circumstances. | ||
| So then, knowing that the airplane can automatically eject the pilot, let's dive into what would happen if an F-35 was hacked. | ||
| Is this even possible? | ||
| Now, this was just a Quora thread. | ||
| I just Googled whether or not the F-35 could be hacked. | ||
| Of course, knowing that it could, but I wanted to see some more information. | ||
| What could actually be hacked? | ||
| First, I wanted to make sure that the ejection seat could be triggered remotely, because if it was impossible for it to be triggered remotely, then I wouldn't be covering why I think the Chinese hacked the plane and then force eject the pilot. | ||
| But since we know that it can be triggered based off of certain parameters that the airplane perceives to be manifest, then let's see if those systems can be hacked. | ||
| So, this was a great threat. | ||
| I am going to just read it. I hate to just read the news or read articles, but this is detailed and technical enough that I feel the need to just read this. | ||
| So it depends on the type of hack. | ||
| The F-35 primarily has two sets of systems that could be hacked. | ||
| The first is the aircraft itself. | ||
| Being able to hack into the aircraft would be incredibly difficult and the Pentagon's former F-35 program manager has even said that the aircraft itself is unmatched in the entire Department of Defense for how well protected it is. | ||
| That said, there are two main types of hack you could attempt. | ||
| You might possibly break the encryption of F-35 data links and begin feeding false data. | ||
| Which is pretty interesting. Typically, encryption can't be broken by brute force techniques because the computing power isn't strong enough or fast enough to go through the exponential number of options We're good to go. | ||
| So feeding it false data, this could result in the F-35 pilots seeing and sharing false target coordinates, for example, false identities of air, land, sea vehicles, etc. | ||
| The jet could still verify the data with its own sensors, and a pilot could stop accepting data link information, but it would be confusing in a spontaneous moment if it was being fed false data because it had been decrypted or the encryption had been cracked. | ||
| If you had spies, this is the second way, if you had spies high in the ranks of Lockheed Martin, You don't think the Chinese have spies high in the ranks of Lockheed Martin? | ||
| You might be able to sneak software code out, have your nation's programmers modify it to create vulnerabilities or dangerous flaws, and then implement that into the next software upgrade, release to the fleet. | ||
| And of course, I imagine when there's a software upgrade, that would be a time when they would do test flights and test missions like this to see how the new software is performing. | ||
| Software will go through testing and quality control, which would likely filter it out, but perhaps if your agents have enough pull, they could push it through regardless. | ||
| The second set of systems that could be hacked is ALIS. I don't know if it's pronounced ALIS, but it's an acronym for the Autonomic Logistics Information System. | ||
| This system is what the before-mentioned former F-35 program manager did have some concerns about. | ||
| A-List is a software suite, think like Microsoft Office, which runs on military servers at air bases and deployed in the field, and which comprises programs used to diagnose F-35 maintenance issues, log maintenance actions, track individual parts, order spare parts, manage briefs and debriefs, manage | ||
| training, etc. | ||
| Those A-list programs run on a military version of windows and a number of those | ||
| programs need to at least every 30 days or so communicate data to slash from a | ||
| central Lockheed server in Texas. | ||
| Furthermore, the data is transferred via standard military networks, whether that | ||
| be carriers transmitting the data via satellite or air bases transmitting the | ||
| data via regular fiber optic cables laid across US mainland across the ocean. | ||
| So basically there are a couple of different ways that this could be hacked. | ||
| The easiest way seems to be if there are spooks inside of Lockheed Martin, | ||
| foreign agents inside of Lockheed Martin, and feasibly given the fact that we know | ||
| the ejection can be triggered automatically, hackers could hack the F35 | ||
| so that it perceives conditions which are not actually the case, right? | ||
| So we know that with the Supermax that came out that was crashing into the ground, there was a software issue where the plane believed that it was idling when it wasn't, so it would trigger a nosedive that wasn't necessary and those planes crashed into the ground. | ||
| So what if you were to hack the F-35B and Trick the F-35B into believing that it's in a free fall. | ||
| Even though it's not, it could be flying straight. | ||
| It could be at a perfect altitude. Everything's going fine. | ||
| But for some reason, the system thinks that nothing's going fine because you've lied to it with this hack. | ||
| And then you could force eject the pilot at that point. | ||
| And it seems to me that this is incredibly likely as to what happened, that the Chinese hacked it for whatever reason, probably just to prove to the United States that it could be done, as well as to test whether or not it could be done, that they hacked it, that they ejected the pilot, That the plane was on autopilot and for 28 hours the military was trying to decide what to do about it, given that they did not have control of an $80 million weapon of war. | ||
| And it either crashed or they decided that they were going to wait for it to be over a safe area and bring it down perhaps by means of the other pilot in its vicinity. | ||
| That was flying in tandem with us. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back after this break. | ||
| Make sure you call in. I'll give the number in the next segment and visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroer today. | ||
| So we've proven that the F-35B has an automatically ejectable pilot seat, and we've gone through one thread arguing that the F-35 could be feasibly hacked. | ||
| There is this article from Popular Mechanics, if you want sort of a more established source than just a response on a core thread, but based on that response that we read in the last segment, I do feel like whoever was giving it New something, rather. | ||
| But this Popular Mechanics article is from 2018 about whether or not the F-35B can be hacked. | ||
| And it even states here that hackers could conceivably introduce bad data in the JRE. Not the Joe Rogan experience, but this is sort of another platform that it's on, like the A-list. | ||
| That could compromise the safety of a mission, shortening the range of a weapon system so that a pilot thinks she is safely outside the engagement zone when she is most certainly not. | ||
| So they're saying that the craft can't be hacked in this article in a way that it could be necessarily turned on or caused to roll off the runway. | ||
| That's what the article claims anyway. | ||
| But that it could be hacked in such a way that it is... | ||
| Compromised by bad data. | ||
| And if the seat auto-ejects based off of the data on the plane, and the data on the plane can be compromised, then you can hack it to automatically eject the pilot. | ||
| The question is whether or not the hack happened in sort of real-time, remotely from the Chinese, or whether or not bad software was installed on the craft prior to its training mission, which caused it to automatically eject the pilot immediately. | ||
| At a certain point within the mission. | ||
| That's the question for me. I'm hearing from Tony Schaefer that it was hacked. | ||
| It's very bizarre the circumstances in which it went down. | ||
| I don't believe there's any footage or any witnesses of the pilot ejecting from the plane, which I'm told is incredibly loud and very visible and something that does catch the eye. | ||
| And I haven't seen any images or footage of the actual craft or parts of the craft on the crash site. | ||
| I've only seen images of the crash site. | ||
| And I understand that images of a crashed F-35 may be classified information. | ||
| Maybe they're worried that some sort of technology that's classified could be exposed by showing such footage. | ||
| But I think it's very bizarre that a plane which nobody ever knew where it was disappeared. | ||
| And then when it was found, it isn't there. | ||
| So I want to take your calls and hear what you think. | ||
| Make sure you call in. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| We may take some calls at the end of this hour. | ||
| We're in the last segment here. But we're going to definitely take calls throughout the next hour. | ||
| The earlier you call, the more likely it is that we'll be able to get to you. | ||
| Please call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| What do you think is going on with this F-35? | ||
| Does anybody in the audience have any involvement with the Air Force or Lockheed or background to provide some context around this automatic ejection, other details of the craft, procedures when a craft goes missing, why they grounded the entire fleet when it went missing? | ||
| Anybody with any military experience, Air Force experience, or familiarity with the F-35, let me know if I'm just full of it. | ||
| Any software engineers who may have some insight on what it would be like, or cyber intelligence people with insight on what it would be like to actually hack this machine? | ||
| I'm very curious to know, and I also want to know... | ||
| If it was hacked by the Chinese, why do you think they did it? | ||
| Do you think they just did it to give the finger to the United States in the context of their recent heightened aggression against Taiwan? | ||
| Are they trying to threaten the United States before they go to war with Taiwan to strike the fear in the hearts of the administration? | ||
| But I don't think that we are going to be in a position to defend Taiwan. | ||
| And I don't necessarily think that I would be someone who would suggest that we do defend Taiwan. | ||
| I'm certainly not a supporter of Ukraine. | ||
| I don't think that the United States should get involved in foreign wars. | ||
| I think our involvement in foreign wars has created unprecedented blowback. | ||
| Just like Ron Paul said it would, and most of the enemies that we have today worldwide are as a result of our meddling internationally, whether it's military conflict, trade conflict, manipulating our currency, coercing our allies and our enemies, bullying everyone dependent on our currency into doing things they don't really want to do. | ||
| Because they're worried that we'll cripple their economy if they don't do them. | ||
| So I don't think that we should defend Taiwan with our military should it be invaded. | ||
| But I do believe that we should be doing things in terms of our foreign policy, our international policy, our trade policy. | ||
| To prevent China from reaching a point where it feels comfortable invading Taiwan, I certainly think the Taiwanese have the right to be independent. | ||
| I certainly think that Taiwan is a very valuable ally. | ||
| I think that the semiconductors that they produce are not only beneficial to our military, but also have incredible commercial value. | ||
| The high-speed chips they use are used for high-speed trades on the stock market. | ||
| The chips that are developed in Taiwan are used for much of our technology, our electric vehicles, not even our electric vehicles, all vehicles. | ||
| I mean, part of the reason why we had a shortage, I believe, during the pandemic was because there was a chip shortage. | ||
| So Taiwan is an incredibly important strategic ally, and I can see why China would want to seize that ally. | ||
| And maintain control over this semiconductor, super small microchip, super fast microchip processing infrastructure. | ||
| And I believe the Taiwanese are among the only nations with the right tooling and the right skills | ||
| and the right knowledge and infrastructure in place to manufacture these chips. | ||
| So if Taiwan was taken by China, of course, China would be able to use these people | ||
| and these facilities, but the United States would have to find a way | ||
| to source these materials without Taiwan or to pay an astronomical fee for these materials | ||
| by importing them from what would now be a part of the CCP. | ||
| And we simply don't have the manufacturing in place here We'd have to do it somewhere else. | ||
| I mean, it's so expensive to hire professionals to work in the United States and the professionals that do exist, the engineering graduates that do exist, don't necessarily have the knowledge, experience, or skills to clone these facilities to make this technology. | ||
| So it would be a major problem. | ||
| All technology would become much more expensive. | ||
| It would put our military at an incredible disadvantage relative to the CCP. And frankly, we're not in a position to stop them from doing it because we are sending all of our resources and focusing all of our attention on what's going on between Russia and Ukraine. | ||
| And everyone knows that one of the major rules of war is never to fight an enemy or a war on two fronts. | ||
| So no one in the military, unless they're compromised or just totally incompetent, It's going to recommend that we stave off Russian aggression in Ukraine and simultaneously stave off Chinese aggression in Taiwan should there actually be a hot war there. | ||
| We're going to have to choose one and frankly I choose neither. | ||
| We should have had sophisticated enough and savvy enough international relations and foreign policy to prevent us from getting to this point in the first place. | ||
| But I do want to take your calls. | ||
| Make sure you call on 877-789-2539. | ||
| Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
| Let's jump right in to clip eight before the end of the segment. | ||
| President Putin declared in the autumn of 2021 and he actually sent a draft treaty that he wanted NATO to sign to promise no more NATO enlargement. | ||
| That was what he sent us. | ||
| And that was a precondition for not to invade Ukraine. | ||
| Of course, we didn't sign that. | ||
| The opposite happened. | ||
| He wanted us to sign the promise never to enlarge NATO. He wanted us to remove our military infrastructure in all allies that have joined NATO since 1997, meaning half of NATO, all the Central and Eastern Europe. | ||
| We should remove NATO from that part of our alliance. | ||
| Introducing some kind of E and B, a second-class membership. | ||
| We rejected that. | ||
| So he went to war to prevent NATO, more NATO close to his borders. | ||
| He has got the exact opposite. | ||
| He has got more NATO presence in the eastern part of the alliance and he has also seen that Finland has already joined the alliance and Sweden will soon be a full member. | ||
| This is good for the Nordic countries, it's good for Finland and Sweden, and it's also good for NATO, and it demonstrates that when President Putin invaded a European country to prevent more NATO, he's getting the exact opposite. | ||
| So that was NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg revealing that Russia | ||
| offered not to invade Ukraine if the alliance would agree to deny Zelensky | ||
| membership. Of course there were some other stipulations included in that | ||
| video as well but there was a diplomatic way to prevent this from happening to | ||
| begin with and that's exactly what I'm talking about. Why are we arriving at a | ||
| position in which we need to decide between supporting our own people and | ||
| what's good for America and supporting our allies when our allies are faced | ||
| with enemies with threats that they never needed to be faced with to begin | ||
| I mean, this is not like an earthquake or a hurricane, which just sort of came out of the blue. | ||
| Nobody knew it was coming. We could have totally stopped this aggression if we would have just been more competent in our foreign policy. | ||
| Stay with us, folks. Calls in the next segment, 877-789-2539. | ||
| Google, which is owned by Alphabet Incorporated, is worth roughly $1.7 trillion. | ||
| I consider myself as an entrepreneur, one of the greatest entrepreneurs of our times, Sergey Brin, who is, as you know, the co-founder and president of Alphabet. | ||
| A number that rivals the GDP of some first world nations. | ||
| This Goliath recently decided that the First Amendment no longer applies to U.S. citizens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Think of this as a search engine for your fact checks that can help you determine fact from fiction. | |
| To add claim review markup, you'll need to provide the following information. | ||
| The URL of the article, the name of the organization that conducted the fact check. | ||
| Once you've provided this information, you can click create to add the markup to the article. | ||
| Google will then crawl the article and add the markup to its database. | ||
| While others in Silicon Valley tied to the World Economic Forum and the United Nations continue to build a Trojan horse of neo-feudalism. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Reducing that hateful content from being seen is one of the best examples how X is committed. | |
| to encouraging healthy behavior online. | ||
| Internet censorship has grown since the Obama administration to be an unregulated wild beast. | ||
| Who needs free speech as long as the economy is going good? | ||
| Social media, once seen as a mechanism to promote knowledge and understanding and solidarity, has proved to be just as effective promoting hatred and paranoia. | ||
| And propaganda and conspiracy theories. | ||
| Fast forward to 2023 and the barely acknowledged federal lawsuit, Missouri versus Biden, is revealing a cancerous censorship network that grew between big tech, U.S. intelligence agencies, and the Biden administration while given cover by a mockingbird media that violently drowned the First Amendment in favor of a level of totalitarianism that directly threatens national security. | ||
| The only pandemic we have is among the unvaccinated. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Judge Terry Doty calling the Biden administration's efforts a massive attack against free speech and targeted suppression of conservative ideas. | |
| The decision means top White House officials and several federal agencies, including the FBI and the Department of Justice, cannot communicate with social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, Pressuring or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression or reduction of content containing protected free speech. | ||
| Had a big couple of weeks here, Stuart, with uncovering really a vast censorship enterprise. | ||
| At least 45 As the New York Post reported, So far, 67 officials or agencies, including the FBI, have been accused in the lawsuit of violating the First Amendment by pressuring Facebook, Twitter, and Google to censor users for alleged misinformation or disinformation. | ||
| The problem is the mis- and disinformation proved to be true. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Right, who makes the decision of what's disinformation, what's truthful, and what's not? | |
| I mean, after all, we saw a Russia hoax for years. | ||
| And that turned out not to be true. | ||
| We saw the doctors in front of the Supreme Court building talking about potential other treatments and those videos were all taken down. | ||
| Now we know that those treatments could have saved many lives. | ||
| Unhindered, the Department of Defense contracted a New York-based AI company to deploy software to target disinformation On social media in real time. | ||
| Meanwhile, Google continues to interfere in US elections, pioneer the forced entry of AI's deep mind into our personal lives, and replace the propagandist Mockingbird Media with AI journalists, while creating an online media ecosystem that will eliminate disinformation, aka independent journalism. | ||
| However, Section 230 continues to shield big tech from a tsunami of lawsuits, as our bought-and-paid-for, do-nothing Congress allows Google to quickly replace them with a one-world government. | ||
| John Bowne reporting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Welcome to the War Room! | |
| I'm Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Today, we are going to be taking calls for the duration of this hour. | ||
| Make sure you call in if you have something to say. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| We've been talking a lot about the F-35, and I'm going to take some calls with an emphasis on the F-35 this hour. | ||
| I want to hear first from Michael in Virginia. | ||
| Michael, what's on your mind? | ||
| It's not about whether or not these facts of hacking are true. | ||
| It's the fact that we have the ability to isolate information and infiltrate our technology slowly so that they can do what they do. | ||
| The indication points to the fact that the possibility of all of our products being manufactured in China, number one, and some of our propulsion system units are, believe it or not, from that part of the world. | ||
| Now, it's possible listening devices or information technology has been permeated into the actual molecular structure Of that material. | ||
| That's the best listening device. | ||
| If you've been hacked, somehow, maybe one thing is a distraction. | ||
| But the point that it facts to listening devices are possibilities. | ||
| Many probabilities exist. | ||
| Points to that fact. | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. Well, I think that's a really good point. | ||
| If we're having parts manufactured in China, then what's to say that they don't install espionage technology in those parts? | ||
| Next up, I want to take Air Force guy in Nevada. | ||
| Air Force guy in Nevada, what do you have to say about this F-35? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, what's up? Hey, so, my whole deal is, like, I got two scenarios here, because we're talking about the plane that took off, and they're, like, they're not being any debris or whatever. | |
| Well, because over here, they have what's called the aggressive squadron and stuff like that in the Tonopah range, so these guys go up and practice these dogfights. | ||
| In that particular range, but when they're like in certain areas, they're still under FAA restriction as far as speed and stuff. | ||
| So like the reason why I'm saying that is like we had one incident where a guy on the range miscalculated and he lost like depth perception. | ||
| And he nosedived at like 700, 800 miles an hour into the ground. | ||
| And so there was literally nothing left of that plane. | ||
| But that's kind of like expected, you know what I mean? | ||
| You don't find any parts of a meteorite that come crashing at high speed, you know what I mean? | ||
| Right. But to tell the scenario, he would have been in a low, like a low flight speed wherever he was going with his wingman. | ||
| And that happened here, too. | ||
| I was on an aircraft recovery team, and we were there in a matter of... | ||
| What kind of craft was it? | ||
| Are you allowed to say what kind of craft it was? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, this was an F-15. | |
| I want to say it was an Eagle. | ||
| But these things have, like, these technologies, like you were saying. | ||
| But when these planes crashed, they had a team there immediately, like, taking off avionics and everything else. | ||
| And the whole perimeter was, they built a perimeter. | ||
| But that aircraft was pretty much intact. | ||
| I mean, all the pieces were there. | ||
| You know, that's what I'm saying. | ||
| Like, in this scenario right here, it seems weird that there's no, no, like, aircraft, like, airframe or anything in these pictures, because it still would have been there, especially 80 miles out. | ||
| The place that we did it, it was, like, 90 miles out of from where we were stationed at. | ||
| That's well within range. And if it nosedived, let's just say hypothetically it nosedived at 700 miles per hour, you think that some of these aerial shots of the crash site would show at least a crater, right? | ||
| So even if the plane was incinerated, you'd think that the actual field where it allegedly crashed would be much more sort of jarbled and destroyed, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, but there's no way he would have been going 700 miles an hour. | |
| That's what I'm saying, because he wasn't in a clear area to be going that fast at that low altitude, whatever altitude he was at. | ||
| There's no way he would have been going 700 miles an hour. | ||
| Like I said, on the range is when they get cleared to regain speed. | ||
| Well, that's where they practice dogfighting. | ||
| But I don't think that this plane was going anywhere near that speed. | ||
| And depending on the altitude, I just personally think it looks weird. | ||
| There should have been a lot more damage. | ||
| You should have seen pretty much pieces of the plane everywhere. | ||
| You know what I mean? However that thing came down. | ||
| So that was weird to me. And I say that because we had to literally rip a plane apart. | ||
| Cut it apart and everything. | ||
| How long did it take to clear it? | ||
| How long did it take for you guys to clear the F-15? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It took us... It literally took probably about the better part of the day. | |
| That's still a big aircraft and you got to cut it into pieces where you can put it into a box and stuff like that and then you trail it back out. | ||
| So is the fact that we're seeing this crash site totally cleared within 24 hours kind of weird? | ||
| Or is it feasible that they would have been able to remove all the parts of the plane within the time period that they had since they identified it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, I think 24 hours to remove it would have been sufficient enough time. | |
| But like I said, I'm basing it off the fact that they are showing aircraft site and they don't have any parts of the plane. | ||
| So depending on where that was at. | ||
| Because I mean, you're literally taking like a K-12 saw and things of that nature, kind | ||
| of like the same things they use to break into cars and stuff like that when people | ||
| get stuck, if they can't use the jaws of life. | ||
| You're basically chopping this plane apart, putting it back together. | ||
| Because usually the points of picking up a plane are no longer available to pick it up | ||
| with a hoist. | ||
| So yeah, it was, for me, if these pictures were prior. | ||
| Where prior to, like, when they just got there and there's, oh, this is the air, this is the site, then I don't believe that. | ||
| I don't believe that at all. You know, but I don't know what time they got there, but, yeah, it was kind of weird. | ||
| But like I said, I was just bringing that up because there's two different things. | ||
| If he knows that at 700 miles an hour, yeah, that plane's going to be pretty much gone, but there would have been a crater. | ||
| But if he was going, like, regular FAA, regulated speed, wherever they were going, sometimes they just do training missions just to fly out, and then they, because they have to do sorties. | ||
| But I highly doubt he was going 700 miles an hour at low altitude. | ||
| Absolutely not. Wow, fascinating. | ||
| Well, it seems like, too, that, you know, if it was hacked via sort of like a local installation of software, right, so somebody had manipulated, say, an update that was put on the plane, that would explain why it could have or how it could have force ejected the pilot, it and then it would it would simultaneously explain why | ||
| the Air Force wouldn't be able to correct the hack remotely right so it's | ||
| probably got all sorts of security mechanisms in place where you can't | ||
| install software or actually hack it remotely so if the corrupted software or | ||
| programming had been put on the plane physically before I had taken off | ||
| because of an installed update you've got a situation in which a pilot could be | ||
| ejected the plane could just be flying around on autopilot or whatever sort of | ||
| preset parameters and the Air Force would have no way of reclaiming that plane so | ||
| that's part of the reason why I think that we may have actually shot it | ||
| down and just been waiting for it to be over a safe area to do that | ||
| I mean, it seems incredibly lucky to me that the plane came down sort of in the middle of nowhere in a field rather than a densely populated area. | ||
| I want to take another call before we cut to break. | ||
| Let's take a look at Andrew in New York. | ||
| Andrew, what do you have to say about the F-35, Chinese stealing technology, anything like that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it was, I think, you know, China has like, they've been like intellectual property | |
| and stuff and they like to leave capture and stuff. | ||
| But they definitely have people throughout all like all forms of a society. | ||
| Like I'm sure they have people like agents in the military. | ||
| For sure. | ||
| They've got agents in the White House. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bye. | |
| Yeah. You know, what are the Bidens if not Chinese agents? | ||
| So yeah, I think it's very feasible that the Chinese have people installed at places like Raytheon or Lockheed Martin that are able to do stuff like this. | ||
| We have time for one more call. We've got one minute before we cut the break. | ||
| Joshua in California, what do you think? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, I just wanted to ask you a personal question. | |
| Do you think it's somewhat hypocritical to be exposing the New World Order, the same agenda, That is being carried out by the Freemasons when you yourself are a 32nd degree Mason? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| I think it's really hypocritical. | ||
| I think that given the fact that me and those I associate myself with conspire together to subjugate all of humanity, it just shows how compromised my character is that I would then come on the air and profess that I'm opposed to all of that. | ||
| Like, there are a lot of Freemasons that are really mad at me because they're like, Chase, you're supposed to be helping us. | ||
| And here I am at InfoWars, and they haven't kicked me out yet, but they don't let me come out with them for cigars after the Lodge cult meeting anymore. | ||
| So hopefully I can mend those relationships. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. We'll be back right after this break. | ||
| Visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser filling in for the great Owen Schroer today. | ||
| Next up, I want to hear from Nick in Florida. | ||
| Nick, how are you today, sir? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm doing fantastic. | |
| How are you? I'm doing well. | ||
| Thanks for your call. Listen, I am a very good family friend. | ||
| I grew up with Philip J. Colonel Philip J. Corso's son is my best friend's father. | ||
| They have three children. | ||
| They all work in the aircraft industry. | ||
| And so I have a huge insight on how the... | ||
| Aircraft industry works. | ||
| And long story short, some of them have worked for Lockheed Martin. | ||
| Some of them still currently do. | ||
| And as far as the hacking goes, I believe it is totally feasible. | ||
| The software for these things is just like you explained earlier. | ||
| It's just a military version of Microsoft. | ||
| And it is very possible that there could be a mole In Lockheed Martin, or just the fact that we all know that our constituents have China in their back pocket. | ||
| So in turn, this all could have just been planned. | ||
| That's what I think, anyways. | ||
| I think this was all planned. | ||
| This was, you know, I think this was set up. | ||
| This was planned. It wasn't I don't think it crashed. | ||
| It doesn't look like a crash. | ||
| It's the same as when they said a plane hit the Pentagon. | ||
| Yeah, that's exactly what came to mind. | ||
| It wouldn't be the first time that the government lied about what happened to an airplane. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. Absolutely. | |
| Yeah. Well, great call. | ||
| I do appreciate your thoughts on that. | ||
| And I agree with you. And the thing that's crazy, it's like there's only so many times something can happen before you're like, this isn't a coincidence, right? | ||
| So we have a bunch of lasers visible in late January, early February over Maui's Space Force Space Center. | ||
| And then within 24 hours, 700 gallons of diesel fuel spills out of that facility because something went wrong with the fuel pump. | ||
| And then six months later, we have this major fire all over the island. | ||
| Not to say that it's associated with the diesel, but there is reasonable evidence to suggest that the fire was started by lasers because nothing blue seems to burn. | ||
| I mean, you guys saw the Reese report. | ||
| And then we have instances where... | ||
| Mississippi's government websites are down in several areas, as a caller called in last week and mentioned. | ||
| And nobody really knows why. | ||
| What's going on? It's a ransom attack. | ||
| Simultaneously, there's a cyber attack going on in Las Vegas that's not really being reported anywhere. | ||
| I heard about it from a caller for the first time. | ||
| And then, within the same week or couple of weeks, we have an F-35 eject a pilot and allegedly crash. | ||
| All in the context of knowing from articles going back all the way to 2013 that all of the F-35 designs had been stolen. | ||
| It's like, how much has to happen? | ||
| This all happening right around Taiwan being surrounded by, what is it, 140 warships and an unprecedented number of planes entering their airspace illegally? | ||
| The defense zone of the Taiwanese. | ||
| How many different things have to happen simultaneously before you're like, even if China's not involved in all of them, there's a good chance that several of these things do actually have to do. | ||
| That's the thing. | ||
| It's like the beginning of a fight. | ||
| There's the yelling, the insults, and the escalation. | ||
| There's the verbal part. | ||
| Then there's the shoving. | ||
| And then the shoving becomes a punch. | ||
| And then the punch becomes the full fight. | ||
| Like, I'm going to rip your face off. | ||
| And right now, I think we're in the shoving stage with both Russia and China, but primarily China. | ||
| China's like... Oh yeah? | ||
| You want to support Taiwan? | ||
| You want to support Taiwan? Okay. | ||
| And then they give us a shove. We shove them back. | ||
| We shove them and we bring down their spy balloon. | ||
| They shove us back when they use lasers to hack a Space Force facility and leak diesel fuel all over an island. | ||
| And then we shove them back with sanctions. | ||
| And then they shove us with fires all over the island. | ||
| And then we shove them back with more sanctions or more rhetoric. | ||
| And then they shove us back by... | ||
| Hacking critical networks in Guam, raising cyber war fears. | ||
| This is from May 24th of this year. | ||
| We see this shoving happening, and hopefully it doesn't escalate to a full-fledged fight. | ||
| And I don't know what the Biden administration would do, but I do find it very interesting that Biden spoke, I think it was today, I believe, and talked about our commitment to Ukraine today. | ||
| At UN. So let's play clip 10, actually, and then we'll take more calls. | ||
| Like every nation in the world, the United States wants this war to end. | ||
| No nation wants this war to end more than Ukraine. | ||
| And we strongly support Ukraine in its efforts to bring about a diplomatic resolution that delivers just and lasting peace. | ||
| Russia alone, Russia alone bears responsibility for this war. | ||
| Russia alone has the power to end this war immediately. | ||
| And it's Russia alone that stands in the way of peace because Russia's price for peace is Ukraine's capitulation, Ukraine's territory, and Ukraine's children. | ||
| Russia believes that the world will grow weary and allow it to brutalize Ukraine without consequence. | ||
| But I ask you this. | ||
| If we abandon the core principles of the United States to appease an aggressor, can any member State and this body feel confident that they are protected. | ||
| If you allow Ukraine to be carved up, is the independence of any nation secure? | ||
| I'd respectfully suggest the answer is no. | ||
| We have to stand up to this naked aggression today and deter other would-be aggressors tomorrow. | ||
| That's why the United States together with our allies and partners around the world will continue to stand with the brave people of Ukraine as they defend their sovereignty. | ||
| That's a very interesting speech in my opinion because I think it's very possible That at this point in the war between Ukraine and Russia, the reason that the United States is supporting Ukraine with such conviction and devotion and consistency is no longer because there's any hope of Ukraine winning the war. | ||
| We know that Ukraine's not going to win this war. | ||
| But because if we back out now, then China knows what it takes How long it takes, what kind of pressure it takes for the United States to stop supporting an ally. | ||
| So if we back out now, is that not signaling? | ||
| And Biden alluded to this in that speech that someone else wrote for him to say. | ||
| What country would be safe from a foreign aggressor if we back out and stop supporting Ukraine against Russia? | ||
| So if we back out now, are we not telling China Like, hey, we'll support Taiwan for 24 months and for half a trillion dollars, but once it gets around the $600 billion mark, that's when the political pressure in the United States becomes such that we back out and stop supporting. | ||
| We don't want China to know, the United States government doesn't want China to know how much it costs. | ||
| To get the United States to give up in supporting an ally. | ||
| So maybe the whole reason that we're perpetuating this war and allowing all these people to die is because we're just trying to convince China that we don't give up on our allies because we're trying to prevent them from invading Taiwan. | ||
| Maybe that's how they're tied together. | ||
| Stick with us, folks. More calls in the next segment. | ||
| I promise. I see you guys on the board. | ||
| I'm going to take your calls. I want to talk about this F-35. | ||
| Make sure you visit Infowarsstore.com and call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| Again, that's Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Get the trifecta. | ||
| Get the food. Stay alive in the apocalypse, folks. | ||
| Go to hell, New World Order. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What the hell? | |
| We are as old friends. | ||
| Is she alright? Seems okay if we can get to it. | ||
| If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Harrison, visit InfoWars.com forward slash show now. | |
| Now. | ||
| you I hope that old man got the tractor beam out of commissioner. | ||
| This is going to be a real short trip. | ||
| Okay. While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, Infowars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
| Visit Infowars.com forward slash show today. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser filling in for Owen Schroyer today. | ||
| We are going to be taking more calls for the rest of the hour. | ||
| Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
| And make sure you don't forget to go to Infowars.com and check out the Trifecta deal. | ||
| Three great products for 40% off if purchased together. | ||
| And 25% off if purchased individually. | ||
| I can testify to the fact that our products are top quality as far as supplements go. | ||
| They do work and they are fantastic. | ||
| So I highly recommend that if you see something on there that alleges to treat symptoms that you're having, chances are these products are going to work. | ||
| First up, I want to take Nick in Florida. | ||
| Nick, what is on your mind? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, as I was saying before, you pointed out a lot of good points when we broke up before. | |
| Everything fits together. | ||
| And let me tell you a little bit of background about myself. | ||
| I've been red-pilled since I was about 12 years old because of my best friend's grandfather, Lieutenant Philip J. Corso. | ||
| So all these things that are happening now is so surreal to me because it's unfolding in front of my eyes. | ||
| And to me, it's actually relieving to know that these things are true and they're truthful. | ||
| Now, their family had built experimental aircraft for many, many years. | ||
| It was a family business. | ||
| The family still works in aircraft. | ||
| Long story short, anything made by a human, even if it's the most technologically advanced thing that there is, there's potential for problems. | ||
| There's potential for somebody to hack it. | ||
| Somebody's going to be able to reverse engineer something. | ||
| This F-35 This whole incident, this was on purpose, if you ask me. | ||
| In my opinion, this fits into all these little nuances, like you're saying, when push comes to shove and we shove back. | ||
| You made those great points. | ||
| But it's just one more thing. | ||
| It's ridiculous. And I also want to just make a plug that all your products are totally fantastic. | ||
| My mother had a severe brain injury. | ||
| Nobody knew how to fix anything. | ||
| And she was having major seizures. | ||
| I started giving her DNA force. | ||
| She stopped having her seizures. | ||
| Didn't walk for 23 years. | ||
| And after that, He's been walking now for five years. | ||
| Wow, that's an incredible story. | ||
| I can't corroborate any medical claims about our products like that, but that is incredible to hear from you that you had that experience and that your mother is doing much better. | ||
| Thank you so much for your call, Nick. I do appreciate that. | ||
| Next up, I do want to hear from Eric in Tucson. | ||
| Eric, what do you have to say about the F-35? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What's up? Can you hear me? | |
| Yes, sir. You sound great. Alright, so before I get to the F-35 point, I want to, you know, maybe go back in history a little bit. | ||
| And that's probably where we should look into the future, go into the past. | ||
| How many Warhawks, you know, P-40 Warhawks have been hacked? | ||
| I don't know the answer to that. | ||
| Are they hacked all the time? | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're mechanical airplanes from World War II. They don't have any electronics. | |
| They're probably not hacked at all then. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So my point is, I don't even own any kind of an electric car whatsoever. | |
| It's all mechanical, old school, whatever. | ||
| The government doesn't technically know where I'm going, how fast I'm going, any of that stuff. | ||
| My insurance company wants to give me a thing to save money on insurance. | ||
| I can't even use it because my vehicles... | ||
| They won't read. So, kind of my point is, like, we almost have to look into the past. | ||
| I think even movies have touched on this point, you know, where, like, you know, they go up and, you know, they defeat the technology with old school technology. | ||
| You know what I'm saying? Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. | ||
| And that's probably part of the reason why the government's pushing so hard for this green energy, climate change stuff, because if they put everybody in electric cars and all the cars are going to be hooked up to the grid, And to centralize servers, it's going to be just another way they can control your life. | ||
| Like, you know, if there's a warrant out for your arrest, you get in your car, all of a sudden your doors lock and they pull you, they drive you straight to the police station. | ||
| That's some New World Order stuff going on, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
A hundred percent. So if we're flying some old school, you know, piston engine airplanes that are a lot slower than all these jet engine planes, but we install some kind of like EMP device, Yeah, for sure. | |
| A lot of people don't realize that if there's an EMP attack... | ||
| There's like hundreds of thousands of people that would instantly die because all of the aircraft in the air today, all the commercial airliners, they're all electronics-based. | ||
| They're all computer software-based. | ||
| And if the autopilot goes off, then the plane would crash. | ||
| So, yeah, I think we're faced with some serious, serious times coming up. | ||
| Thank you so much for your call. I do appreciate it. | ||
| Next, I do want to take a call from... | ||
| Let's take... | ||
| Let's take Misha in Illinois. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Misha, what do you think? Hey, thanks for taking my call. | |
| My question is, you know, if our greatest assumption with the planes on 9-11 were hijacked by remote control, you know, isn't to say that the technology hasn't advanced. | ||
| And if these planes were hijacked, who's to say that they can't be remote controlled? | ||
| And who's to say that their weapon systems can't be operated by a third party? | ||
| Yeah. Are we witnessing the start of the polycrisis? | ||
| Are we witnessing, you know, you've had all this stuff happening in Vegas with the cyber attacks, and then you had Musk, Gates, and what's his name, Facebook guys, Zuckerberg, and DC, meeting and talking about AI. Now, is it possible that this is not China, but the AI doing this? | ||
| Right? I mean, you know, and The newest Mission Impossible movie, there was a scene at the beginning of the movie, something that you talked about too, where you had this AI system be able to create phantom enemies, and it forced the submarine at the beginning of the movie that was carrying the AI system to launch a missile to then have the AI become independent, right? | ||
| So I think You know, and that movie was written before COVID came out and before the war started. | ||
| Well, as COVID came out, before the war started in Ukraine, and the ship was called the Severopol, and then recently they launched a missile attack on the naval base in the Crimea. | ||
| So, I mean, you know, the programming is something else, you know, going on. | ||
| I think this is just the beginning. | ||
| And who's to say weapon systems and other grids Yeah, that's a great point. | ||
| And we'll talk more about that in the next segment. | ||
| I'm gonna have the crew pull something up during this break. | ||
| I'm gonna go back there and find a particular article because that reminds me of a really interesting story. | ||
| These tech entrepreneurs, with perhaps the exception of Elon Musk, they believe themselves to be gods. | ||
| They believe their We're good to go. | ||
| What comically illustrates this is that they're right so often that they can't believe it when they're wrong because it hasn't been a common occurrence. | ||
| And they think they've got this all under control, folks, but it is going to fly back in their face. | ||
| Stay with us, folks. Visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| More calls in the next segment. | ||
| My fellow patriots. | ||
| Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
| I am Chase Geiser filling in for Owen Schroyer for the last segment of this hour and the last segment of this show today. | ||
| Tomorrow I will be filling in for Harrison Smith in the morning on the American Journal and Thursday as well. | ||
| It is an honor and a pleasure to be with you. | ||
| Thank you so much for having me. | ||
| That last caller had some great points, and I just wanted to pull up this old story. | ||
| This story is from earlier this year, I think back in April. | ||
| Elon Musk said he hasn't talked to his former friend Larry Page in years. | ||
| Quote, he got very upset with me about OpenAI. | ||
| Elon Musk said Larry Page hasn't spoken to him in years after they disagreed about AI safety. | ||
| Musk said Page wanted to create a digital god and accused him of being a speciest. | ||
| The Tesla CEO became friends with the Google co-founder during the electric car maker's early days. | ||
| Okay, we don't need to read the entire article, but basically they got in a debate over the safety of AI. | ||
| And Page allegedly wants to create a digital god or wanted to, and called Elon Musk a speciest | ||
| for preferring the rights and safety and interests of human beings over this new species | ||
| which these technocrats believe that they can create in artificial intelligence. | ||
| You see, they don't believe that there's anything divine or special about human beings. | ||
| They don't believe in the divine soul or free will. | ||
| They are materialists. | ||
| They believe everything that happens in the universe is a matter of cause and effect | ||
| and can be explained by the laws of physics. | ||
| They do not believe in divine intervention. | ||
| And so you see, if they can create a technology that mirrors the behavior and activities | ||
| and speech of human beings, then to them it is just as much valuable as a human being. | ||
| It's a philosophy which lacks any sort of sense of metaphysical, moral, divine goodness. | ||
| It is a philosophy that lacks any sort of real, genuine human empathy, and it is a philosophy that is not based off of any divine plan or divine claims of what is good and what is evil, and so therefore... All morality to them is whim, and they are justified in things like censorship or silencing or whatever trendy moral or philosophical claim of the day. | ||
| They are absolutely lost. | ||
| And just like my friend last week broke up with me. | ||
| Cover that on air. Larry Page isn't talking to Elon. | ||
| I'm sure Elon would be happy to talk to Larry Page, but... | ||
| He's probably written him off as a right-wing extremist. | ||
| I want to hear from Dan in Wisconsin. | ||
| Dan, what's on your mind this afternoon? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, I just wanted to let you know that it was the Jesuits that stole the F-35. | |
| It was the Jetsuits, bro. | ||
|
unidentified
|
J-E-T-S-U-I-T-S. It's them every time. | |
| Jetsuits, bro. Every time. | ||
| Thanks so much for your call, Dan. | ||
| I'm pretty sure that's Alex just changing his name. | ||
| Let's hear from Jay in Ohio. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Jay, what's up? Hey, three words. | |
| Shalom, Shavuotov. | ||
| That means peace and happy new year. | ||
| Thanks. And I was over at the synagogue this weekend for Rosh Hashanah, and my shirt I had on. | ||
| Underneath, I didn't have a white, clear shirt, and I had a white shirt on. | ||
| In the back it said Infowars through the shirt. | ||
| A woman in front of mine, she could see it and she said, oh I love the Reese Report! | ||
| And she listens to Infowars and that was interesting. | ||
| But her husband, not such a believer in Infowars, And when she was talking about the Reese report, about the planes going into the building, how three buildings come down. | ||
| Yeah. Oh no, it was two airplanes and 18 hijackers. | ||
| I said, well, why did three buildings come down? | ||
| Really? Three buildings came down? | ||
| I can't believe people don't know that. | ||
| That's amazing. Not a clue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've been listening to you all morning and today and it's really nice to see you taking the heat and the Jews aren't getting targeted today. | |
| That's why you guys sent me here, right? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. And then the other thing I wanted to say was I work a 14-hour day. | |
| I'm basically a Jewish cowboy truck driver. | ||
| And if I didn't have the vitamins and minerals and the turbo force and the fusion and everything, there's no way I could... | ||
| I'm 59 years old and nobody can keep up with me. | ||
| And there's about 300 drivers and I'm about the highest paid driver I imagine for my division. | ||
| And I know I couldn't do it without the products that you guys supply. | ||
| That's awesome. And I'm so grateful for you for being there, and I've been listening for years and years and years. | ||
| And as for Owen, I just wanted to say, his sarcasm is hilarious. | ||
| And one day, I was eating some noodles out of a cup of noodles, and he said, and we're going to now listen to Kennedy read off the text messages of Obama to... | ||
| Yeah, that was absolutely hysterical. | ||
| I specifically remember when he did that. | ||
| I thought that was absolutely brilliant. | ||
| That's hysterical. Thank you so much for your call. | ||
| Is there anything else you want to leave the audience with? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I just want to say all you guys are great, and I give, and I'm a big fan. | |
| And you guys, it was really nice to see Alex out there in Austin, and everybody's waving at him and giving him the thumbs up. | ||
| It was really good to see that, you know? | ||
| Yeah, absolutely. There's way more of us than you can imagine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think I know what happened to that fighter jet, though. | |
| You know how every vehicle has a VIN number? | ||
| Yeah. I'm surprised. I'm surprised that they haven't found Alex Jones' wallet next to the VIN number in the crash site. | ||
| Do you guys have it in Texas? | ||
| I'm not allowed to either confirm or deny those allegations. | ||
| Thank you so much for your comment. | ||
| I appreciate it and well wishes to you and your family. | ||
| Thank you for being a loyal listener and consumer of the products. | ||
| I'm glad that the products have been able to help you stay energized and productive. | ||
| Before we go, I would be remiss not to mention that Ray Epps today was charged for breaching the U.S. capital grounds. | ||
| And you all know how I feel about that. | ||
| You all know how I feel about Ray Epps in general. | ||
| Different shows, different broadcasts on this network have covered it. | ||
| And I still feel the same way, frankly. | ||
| This is a wrist slap situation. | ||
| And I just want to draw your attention, and yet please keep the cam over these perfect, just like you have it, to all these headlines. | ||
| And let me know if you see something in common with all of these headlines about it from the major media outlets. | ||
| So this is Reuters. | ||
| Ray Epps conspiracy theorist Target is charged for breaching U.S. Capitol grounds. | ||
| Politico. Feds charge Ray Epps, the January 6th protester, at center of unproven hard-right conspiracy theories. | ||
| Axios. DOJ charges Trump supporter at center of January 6th conspiracy theory. | ||
| Washington Post. | ||
| Ray Epps' focus of a January 6th conspiracy theory is charged in Capitol riot. | ||
| Forbes. Ray Epps charged with January 6th crime after conspiracy theory claimed he worked for the FBI. CNN, Ray Epps, focus of January 6th conspiracy theories charged with misdemeanor related to Capitol riot. | ||
| New York Times, Ray Epps, target of January 6th conspiracy theory charged in Capitol attack. | ||
| Infowars, Ray Epps charged with misdemeanor along delayed wrist slap. | ||
| ABC News, former Oathkeeper Ray Epps, a target of January 6th conspiracy theories charged by the DOJ. NBC News. | ||
| Ray Epps, subject of Tucker Carlson's January 6th conspiracy theory, is charged by the DOJ. AP. Ray Epps, center of January 6th conspiracy theory, is charged with misdemeanor over Capitol riot. | ||
| Yahoo News. Elon Musk. | ||
| Well, that was from before. | ||
| So, every single headline, except for the Infowars headline, Pointed out that this person was the center of a conspiracy theory. | ||
| So it seems to me why they charged him with this misdemeanor wrist slap, this low-level crime, was just so that they could manifest for themselves a counter-argument to the conspiracy theory that he was perhaps not who he said he was or there for the reasons that he said he was there. | ||
| So, I wish I could talk to you more about that and take more calls, but we're coming up on the end of the hour, on the end of the show today. | ||
| Make sure that you visit Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| It is the reason that we are still on the air, because people like you... | ||
| Visit Infowarsstore.com and purchase great products. | ||
| And fortunately, we have a loyal customer base that comes back and purchases products repeatedly, which has been the reason we've been able to stay on the air for so many years and in despite of all the censorship. | ||
| And the reason our customers buy these products time and time again, the reason we have so many repeat customers is because these products work. | ||
| Unleash your full potential with the InfoWars Life Trifecta Pack. | ||
| If you get bodies, the real Red Pill Plus, and DNA Force together, you do get 40% off. | ||
| Please visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Thank you so much for giving me the opportunity to speak to you today. | ||
| I will see you tomorrow morning on the American Journal. | ||
| Good night and God bless. | ||
| We have been right in the red, right in the black. | ||
| We are now into the black. | ||
| And I want to go major into the black so that we can get out of this bankruptcy reorganization and then say, okay, we're going to hire more reporters. | ||
| We're going to expand. | ||
| And I'm making those arguments right now. | ||
| I'm about to make them to the bankruptcy court in like a month. | ||
| Looks like it's going to go through. | ||
| We're going to stay on air. But I don't want to just sit here and have some court deal where we just operate and crawl along. | ||
| I want to supercharge and I want to expand and build this operation. | ||
| That takes funds. Plus, that's a side issue. | ||
| These are great products. | ||
| Our nitric mousse is incredible. | ||
| Cleans out your blood. Highest quality. | ||
| You've heard Dr. Mikovic say how amazing it is. | ||
| It's discounted. Double Patriot points right now. | ||
| Up to 60% off on products at Infoworksware.com. | ||
| And then this final point. It's been three years since we had it. | ||
| We got it back in stock. | ||
| The amazing 30 parts per million. | ||
| Highest quality colloidal silver and all the great things and all the great uses. | ||
| Back in stock. Limited supply. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 30% off. | ||
| And it's a very limited supply, but we have it back. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Silver Bullet Colloidal Silver. | ||
| Infowars Live Silver Bullet Colloidal Silver has returned. | ||
| Silver Bullet is the answer. | ||
| Through Alex's extensive search for a powerful colloidal silver product that utilizes high-quality processes to ensure for a truly unique product that has applications for both preparedness and regular use. | ||
| It is amazing. | ||
| It's got thousands of reviews, five-star reviews. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Silver Bullet returns to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And while you're there, get some super female vitality, some Turbo Force, some Brain Force, and some Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| Because they're all about to sell out. |
Export Selection