Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Well, ladies and gentlemen, your political MD is in the house. | ||
| And we told you when we signed off yesterday... | ||
| A massive political cardiac arrest event incoming. | ||
| And two, two, count them, two new whistleblowers into the Biden crime family have come forward just since we signed off the air yesterday. | ||
| And we learned more about this Joe Biden burner phone that Jim Jordan is going to be subpoenaing to get those records if they still exist. | ||
| That burner phone may have faced the Hillary Clinton fate of a hammer. | ||
| Smashing it to smithereens. | ||
| But we may find out. | ||
| But now, Mr. | ||
| X, whose identity is being kept secret, I suppose, to protect his own livelihood. | ||
| Remember, it was the FBI that said, we can't unmask our informant. | ||
| His life is in danger. | ||
| So I guess that's why Mr. | ||
| X is keeping his identity anonymous. | ||
| So this is breaking today right before we go on air. | ||
| A second Biden whistleblower in the last 18 hours coming forward. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not much. We just know his name is Mr. | |
| X. Of course, it's not his real name, but he wants to be anonymous. | ||
| He told congressional staff last month he became emotional after seeing the way that this probe was handled from the beginning. | ||
| Mr. X worked under the more publicized whistleblower Gary Shapley, and a letter released last week mixed Mr. | ||
| X says it was clear to him that Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney David Weiss was not running the probe. | ||
| Quote, he had to follow the normal process. | ||
| He had to go to Washington, D.C., the U.S. Attorney's Office, them saying no. | ||
| So he really wasn't in charge. | ||
| He had to follow the process, end quote. | ||
| But just three weeks ago, Trace Weiss wrote and signed a letter addressed to House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan. | ||
| We obtained a copy. It reads, in part, I want to make clear that, as the Attorney General has stated, I have been granted ultimate authority over this matter, including responsibility for deciding where, when, and whether to file charges. | ||
| Given the discrepancy between what Weiss allegedly said in the meeting and what he wrote in the letterhouse, Republicans want to hear from him and others in his office under oath. | ||
| We want to talk to David Weiss, the U.S. attorney. | ||
| We want to get the answers. And the way you do that is to talk to these attorneys who handled this case. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Attorney General Merrick Garland has denied blocking Weiss from investigating. | |
| The story continues on Capitol Hill and in the courts. | ||
| Trace. Back to you as the news warrants, David Spunt, live for us in D.C. David, thank you. | ||
| So let's try to get all caught up here. | ||
| I am going to show you last night's whistleblower later on in the transmission. | ||
| And this just isn't about the Bidens. | ||
| I think this gets into the larger political corruption. | ||
| But The Bidens know how to engage in illegal campaign fundraising and donations, but they don't tell the people donating to them that it's illegal. | ||
| Oh, I guarantee you it's not the Bidens that came up with this trick or this method, but everybody's focus is on the Biden crime family now since Joe is in the White House. | ||
| Now, you just heard from Jim Jordan. | ||
| The chair of the House Judiciary Committee who also just released a document last night, the weaponization of CISA. Jordan plans to subpoena Weiss and others. | ||
| Jordan plans to subpoena to get the Biden burner phone. | ||
| And then who else is going to get subpoenaed in this process? | ||
| Hunter Biden might get subpoenaed at some point. | ||
| These other whistleblowers may have to testify. | ||
| This is certainly getting interesting. | ||
| And I think that the tape that got leaked last night through CNN that they've probably had for years, but they decided to leak it last night to distract from the Biden crime family being exposed. | ||
| That's not a coincidence. | ||
| I don't know how many more cards they have in their deck to get Donald Trump. | ||
| I think they've pretty much exhausted their deck. | ||
| And the Biden crime family... | ||
| The deck of cards exposing that is still deep. | ||
| And I can't think of anybody better to have in studio with the House Judiciary releasing this document, the weaponization of CISA, than FBI whistleblower himself, Kyle Serafin, joining me in 90 seconds. | ||
| Loaded broadcast today, the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com, the fastest three hours on the internet. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| You blink and you'll miss it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's my life in a box in front of me. | |
| Take a job and my heart is the sole of me. | ||
| You walk by and you see me laying face down. | ||
| I find the noise in your eyes. | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| We're joined here in the first hour with an in-studio guest, Kyle Serafin, FBI whistleblower. | ||
| And really, you've now become a successful podcast host yourself. | ||
| So you're even a political commentator now, I would say. | ||
| Yeah, it's a weird world to jump in when you are both reporting on news, commenting on news, and then you're also part of the story. | ||
| Part of the story, yeah. We're breaking stories. | ||
| We're making stories in some ways, which is a really weird space for people in that, you know, it's unusual. | ||
| Kind of a triple threat, I guess. You know, and I'm trying to think of the timeline here. | ||
| When you first came out and you were talking about weaponization of government, that was your big issue, where you became a whistleblower. | ||
| We might get into that process, but talk about that experience for you from saying, you know what, I need to make this information public, I'm concerned about my country, I think the people need to know this is going on, to where you're at today, where you're hosting your own podcast, getting big guests and doing good numbers. | ||
| So the issue is this. | ||
| The information, it belongs to American. | ||
| It's American people's information. | ||
| The government likes to hide it through classification, through a lot of obfuscation. | ||
| They don't respond to FOIA, things like that. | ||
| So our motivation, my motivation was essentially like, this is not my information. | ||
| This is everybody's information. We need to put it out there. | ||
| So how do we overcome that? | ||
| And then the second thing is, I need a platform and I need a mechanism, a vehicle to give other whistleblowers a chance to come out. | ||
| And we may not be the biggest in the world, but we can at least get them heard. | ||
| The way that these guys stay safe and the way that they keep the government from coming through their door on some ginned-up search warrant is essentially you give them a platform, you give them a microphone. | ||
| I started off talking to Dan Bongino. | ||
| That was my first move. I was going to say, I believe it was Bongino first. | ||
| Yep. And then I believe Tucker Carlson as well. | ||
| I did Jesse Waters and I've done Laura Ingram. | ||
| I've done Tucker Carlson. | ||
| Yeah, so you name it. Like, if there was an opportunity to get out there, I ran, I was doing 25 media hits a week. | ||
| And, you know, there's no money involved in that sort of thing. | ||
| People are like, oh, you're getting paid? It's like, no, you don't get paid. | ||
| You go out there so you stay alive. | ||
| And more importantly, not that I think that someone's going to come kill me per se. | ||
| I can't rule it out, but... | ||
| You know, moreover... You don't have any dirt on the Clintons, do you? | ||
| Not that I'm aware of, so no Arkansas situation. | ||
| I think you're alright for now. The key was, you want to make sure that you keep your message out there so you don't get buried by the alternative, which is that DOJ goes out and leaks some sort of hit story on you. | ||
| They put it in the New York Times, they put it on CNN, they put it on MSNBC. I had an initial experience with that, where this guy named Ryan Reilly, who reports... | ||
| He was the famous guy that said he saw those little earplugs in front of Missouri, and he thought those were rubber bullets. | ||
| That's Ryan Reilly. I remember him. | ||
| I was there. He reported on my actual first podcast, which was very embarrassing for me to look back on. | ||
| I mean, everyone grows, right? | ||
| So I'm sitting in front of a microphone, like in my dad's study, and I'm just talking to a mic. | ||
| And I said some things about January 6th and so on. | ||
| And he reported on that. And he was like, Seraphine says that, you know, the people that stormed the Capitol, you know, were acting like a bunch of clowns. | ||
| And I was hanging out with a bunch of law enforcement guys on January 6th. | ||
| We saw the live footage. There's a dude wearing a Viking helmet, you know, that's down there in the Capitol. | ||
| And we're like, that's hilarious. | ||
| Like, I don't care who you are. | ||
| That's objectively funny and weird. | ||
| The Simpsons thought it was funny. | ||
| They put it in their show. It is funny. | ||
| It's a silly thing to do. And as my buddy Steve Friend, who's another whistleblower, likes to say, none of us have that copy of the Constitution that has the secret ink on the back that says when you get your guy with the Viking helmet and body paint into the speaker's chair, then you take over the government. | ||
| We don't know about that. | ||
| That was in the Nicolas Cage movie. | ||
| That's right. National Treasure. | ||
| National Treasure. I don't have that copy, though. | ||
| That's the original copy. You haven't seen that one. That's the editor's cut. | ||
| Correct. Exactly. So without that being the case, he tried to quote me and basically come at me with my own statements. | ||
| And it's like, no, dude, I was an FBI agent, right? | ||
| When I speak, I expect that you're going to turn that against me. | ||
| I'm also not foreign to the media idea. | ||
| So, if I'm going to say something out loud, I'm willing to hold myself accountable to | ||
| what that is. | ||
| And I do believe that thing based on what we saw on that day. | ||
| It was an accounting of what happened from a bunch of cops who ended up having to go | ||
| to the Capitol. | ||
| Who know a little bit about crime scenes. | ||
| Correct. | ||
| And know what is and what is not a threat. | ||
| These guys, in fact, all the guys I was out actually had a shooting course. | ||
| And so we're out doing red dot pistol training. | ||
| And the statement was, is like, they were all SWAT operators. | ||
| Every single one of those guys was involved in what's called mutual aid. | ||
| They all got called down to the Capitol that day. | ||
| In fact, their pagers went off and half the class had to disappear. | ||
| And nobody there was particularly worried. | ||
| Nobody was, like, putting on their body armor and scared. | ||
| They were like, we've got to go clean this up. | ||
| Trump has 100 rallies in a year and not a single violent event happens at one. | ||
| Exactly. Law enforcement officers, obviously, you know, you have situational awareness. | ||
| Even sometimes it might go against your training, right? | ||
| You're trained that no matter the situation, this is your approach. | ||
| But you're a human. You have situational awareness. | ||
| And you know, you go to a Trump rally, those 50,000 people are probably not going to be a problem. | ||
| Now, the 50 Antifa outside banging on bongos and whatever, now that might be the problem. | ||
| I've done that too. I was out undercover in a surveillance role in Portland in September and October of 2021. | ||
| No, sorry, of 2020. | ||
| So I actually saw what happened outside the White House, right, at Lafayette Square, when they put Trunk in the bunker. | ||
| We're there a day or two afterwards. | ||
| My buddies are out there in front of it. | ||
| We saw what those guys were doing, and they're stashing bricks, and they're putting... | ||
| Yeah, they were all over downtown. | ||
| Oh yeah, they were everywhere. The scenes are actually crazy. | ||
| We always forget, but there's these scenes from overhead. | ||
| I guess they're from helicopters and stuff. | ||
| And I mean, it looks like it's like a Rome is burning type of scene. | ||
| There were fires. Yeah, there was all these mass movements. | ||
| They were fighting cops. They're throwing explosive devices, which they're fireworks, but they're commercial fireworks. | ||
| So that's really scary stuff. | ||
| And then in the meantime, what else? | ||
| We see this other response out in Portland where they were doing... | ||
| Seriously aggressive stuff. | ||
| Same thing. Throw an explosive device. | ||
| Attacking with laser pointers and so on. | ||
| Trying to fight cops physically. | ||
| You know, usually they get knocked over because they don't tend to lift and the cops tend to be like pretty burly dudes. | ||
| And you got like 40 pounds of equipment on too. | ||
| Yeah, these guys look like, they look like mech warriors. | ||
| And then you see these like, you know, like dudes with these like, you know, wooden shields running out there going like, I got back. | ||
| It was absurd. I watched it through night vision. | ||
| They're LARPing. They were LARPing. | ||
| Have you seen some of the Antipa training videos? | ||
| Yeah, they're funny. Oh my gosh. | ||
| It's funnier than a guy in a Viking helmet. | ||
| Yeah. Much funnier. | ||
| Taking over the government. But I'll tell you this, when you're sitting in a car by yourself and you're miles away from anybody else and six of them surround you and you know that they've called out your license plate over FRS radios because the Bureau was monitoring all this stuff and they're out there and they've identified you as a potential Fed, they're going to come and surround your vehicle and you agree, because I did, that let's see what they do. | ||
| So they surrounded my vehicle. | ||
| And then I'm sitting there just watching hands. | ||
| I'm watching waistband. | ||
| I'm watching demeanor. These are the things that we look for. | ||
| And I'm waiting to see if someone's going to make a move on me and try to do some physical damage. | ||
| And am I going to have to draw my weapon and use it? | ||
| And will my agency even back me up? | ||
| Which you don't know. So that's a really different experience than going into a Trump rally. | ||
| And I've been to State of the Unions. | ||
| I've been to Fourth of July parades. | ||
| All the D.C. area has unlimited protests. | ||
| Yeah, it's every weekend. Every weekend, exactly. | ||
| Most protested place probably in America. | ||
| So the fact that they didn't handle that well, it feels on purpose to people like me. | ||
| Yeah, and again, somebody that has the background, you know what's the normal protocol for something like this. | ||
| It wasn't a secret. It wasn't like, oh, Trump the day before said, I'm going to have an event here. | ||
| Correct. They knew it for months. | ||
| And a lot of this has actually come out. | ||
| Nancy Pelosi had a documentary film crew. | ||
| But getting back here before we take this first break, So, what was it that kind of, what was the straw that broke the camel's back for you? | ||
| And it was like, you know, I've seen a lot of stuff that's concerned me, but I've just been a good agent, but now I've got to go public. | ||
| Was there an incident? | ||
| Was there a moment? Sure. | ||
| So, I started doing what I would call whistleblower activities now, knowing what it looks like. | ||
| I actually started doing that in 2018. | ||
| I would bring things, I was like, hey, through chain of command. | ||
| Inside the Bureau. That's what you're supposed to do, theoretically, but you don't have to. | ||
| So I'm bringing things up to the Office of General Counsel. | ||
| I'm bringing things up to the Equal Opportunity Employment Office. | ||
| I'm bringing things up that I thought were a problem. | ||
| I had a letter drafted by an attorney saying, this is an issue from the Office of General Counsel. | ||
| Like, we're not doing this thing correctly, and we are potentially getting ourselves in trouble for prosecution. | ||
| We would not be able to do our job well. | ||
| All these are ignored. So at some point you get to the point where you see the Attorney General get up in front of Congress and say, we're not going to use the Patriot Act. | ||
| We're not going to use counterterrorism resources to go after parents at school board meetings. | ||
| And when five days later you get an email from the Assistant Director of Counterterrorism saying, we're going to be going after parents at school board meetings, that's a light bulb moment for me. | ||
| So I brought that to Congress directly. | ||
| I skipped the Bureau thing. | ||
| I skipped the, you know, the, what is it, the Office of the Inspector General. | ||
| The protocols you've already gone through. | ||
| Correct. And you have a whole list of them as a whistleblower that you can do. | ||
| And under 5 U.S.C. 7211, you can literally go directly to Congress. | ||
| So I did. And that turns out to be kind of a death sentence for your career if you do that. | ||
| And I'm curious, too, because you mentioned about if you have to use deadly force or use force in a situation. | ||
| I wonder if the Bureau would even treat somebody that they might know their political leanings are to the right differently than maybe somebody to the left. | ||
| Maybe somebody like Officer Michael Byrd gets a little handshake in an award where somebody else might get the boot and prison time. | ||
| Kyle Serafin in studio. We'll be right back. | ||
| I think I'm going to actually start telling Alex that I'm actually just an FBI informant, so he just pays me in cash. | ||
| And then there's no taxes. | ||
| In fact, maybe we should all declare ourselves FBI informants and say, I just want paid in cash, no tax. | ||
| I told them when an Iranian reporter came at me, I was like, I reached out to a guy who works counterintelligence against the Iranians. | ||
| I was like, come at me. Like, I'll go talk to them, but I want to get paid my old salary in cash. | ||
| That Because I was listening for people that don't understand the context here. | ||
| Kyle Serafin was on the Alex Jones show earlier, and you were explaining how a lot of these FBI informants get paid in cash. | ||
| And hey, that's fine. I have no problem getting paid in cash. | ||
| I want us all to get paid in cash. But, wink, wink, nod, nod, you're going to pay your taxes on this, right? | ||
| And they do that to protect their identities, make sure there's no paper trail that leads back to them. | ||
| But at the same time... It gives the federal government the perfect excuse to put their hands up and say, oh, I forgot. | ||
| I don't know anything. I didn't have any informants, and nobody knows any better. | ||
| Yeah, so, I mean, everybody's familiar with this term now. | ||
| There's a couple of different cop-outs that the FBI uses, and we've all heard them. | ||
| So the question is this. Which one's going to pop up on the bingo card first? | ||
| Number one, sources and methods. | ||
| Now, generally speaking, sources are people, but not always. | ||
| There's also a thing called technical sources. | ||
| It's like internet feeds or stuff like that. | ||
| Sources is generally like a human being, a human source. | ||
| But the other possibility is like an exploited phone or an exploited satellite or whatever it may be, or they've gone through and they've got a microphone in your house. | ||
| So that could be a source. That's a technical source. | ||
| They protect the technology, and that's why they won't tell you what it is or how it goes on. | ||
| That's why the Trump thing is going to be so interesting, because they're going to have to declassify those documents to put them in front of a jury. | ||
| I don't think they want to. | ||
| Here's the problem. Those are all top secret, or at least they're marked top secret, and then they have different secured compartmented information markings, like talent keyholes, one of them. | ||
| And so if they're going to go out there and do that, that's geo-information that comes from space-based satellites. | ||
| You're going to have to declassify the information that we got from some very, very sophisticated technology. | ||
| Usually seven figures, sometimes eight figures amounts of money invested in these technologies. | ||
| And then are you what? Are you burning the capability because you exposed it to the enemy? | ||
| You're going to do that to get the orange man bad? | ||
| That's a really weird move. | ||
| That's why most national security prosecutions end up in non-prosecution. | ||
| They'll threaten him and they let it go. | ||
| I'm curious, since we're getting into the Trump tape... | ||
| Didn't mean to, but there we are. No, no, no. | ||
| This is good. This is good. This is why I hate the breaks, because I love the stream of consciousness. | ||
| We're just talking in the break, and so we come out of the break, we keep talking. | ||
| I'm listening to that tape last night, and I actually think that the Democrats or the Justice Department, whoever it is, they're playing this card right now because they're just getting smoked. | ||
| All the Biden whistleblowers, so they've got to play this card, distract from that. | ||
| Now, so... | ||
| I've heard multiple things, and maybe let's just get your take on all these different things. | ||
| Did Trump know he was being recorded? | ||
| Is the reason why they were freaking out about getting security footage because they really can't prove anything with that audio. | ||
| I mean, they can guess what is there, but they really can't. | ||
| I mean, beyond a reasonable doubt, it's not going to work. | ||
| I agree. And so... | ||
| Then there's the aspect, and you could hear it in the tape from last night, Trump obviously wants people to see that document. | ||
| He's not trying to hide that document. | ||
| So right, so what is the document? | ||
| That's the question, right? That's the number one question. | ||
| And the number two question is, is what was the situation of the recording? | ||
| Those are the two questions to me. | ||
| I've heard both ways. Trump did know, Trump didn't know. | ||
| I don't know. I don't know either. | ||
| But what we can do is we can speculate a little bit with some informed background. | ||
| And so I'm a skeptic. | ||
| That's what you do when you're an investigator. | ||
| You look at things and you go, what is the possibilities here? | ||
| When I hear someone talking in a conversation about emails... | ||
| That was not necessarily a logical leap, but there was a discussion about Hillary Clinton prints these things out, right? | ||
| He's rustling through multiple pages. | ||
| Were those emails? Were those emails of someone from DOD saying, hey, this is what we think we should do. | ||
| We should look at these plans, click through these links, talk to these briefings. | ||
| Could it have been emails? Because that made a lot of sense to me when I was listening to it. | ||
| I just do what my dad used to call theater of the mind. | ||
| My dad was in radio for a long time. | ||
| I like that. So you close your eyes and what do you hear? | ||
| You hear a man rustling papers, talking about emails, talking about someone else would have printed these things off. | ||
| This says it right here. | ||
| This proves my case. | ||
| Does it prove your case to show maps and battle plans or does it prove your case to show text and We're good to go. | ||
| Is every day there's basically a new file from that day. | ||
| And it's the stories from that day. | ||
| It's whatever he worked on from that day. | ||
| He puts it in a file and he puts it into these boxes. | ||
| Right. And they took a lot of those boxes. | ||
| Trump didn't have time to go through any of it. | ||
| So it sounds to me like Trump has a news story that's talking about... | ||
| In fact, I believe the story was from Politico. | ||
| Maybe you guys can find the story. It was Milley says Trump's going to get us into a war with Iran. | ||
| Right. Correct. Was the headline. | ||
| Trump will end us up in a war with Iran. | ||
| You swear worded there too, by the way. | ||
| Yeah, yeah. I forget what it was. It's an effing war. | ||
| Effing war. That's the one. And so Trump is like, this is the complete opposite of the truth. | ||
| I didn't want the war. | ||
| Right. This proves my case. | ||
| That's what he says. So do you think it's either an email or maybe it is a document or an email that he printed? | ||
| It could be presidential briefings. Are you familiar with that? | ||
| Like, he gets a briefing every morning. | ||
| Here's the intelligence updates of the day. | ||
| And it's like Milley saying, hey, because they were mad that he removed us from the Iran deal. | ||
| That's what angered them. So they were trying to make him look bad for that, and they said Trump is going to get us into a war with Iran, and he's got a document where it's Milley who's the one suggesting they get into a war with Iran. | ||
| Plausible. Highly plausible. | ||
| Like I said, we don't know the facts, so we're speculating, and that makes sense to me. | ||
| The second thing is, you heard the audio. | ||
| Who did it sound like the microphone was on? | ||
| I guess the writer? | ||
| It sounded like it was on Trump to me. | ||
| You think Trump was wearing it? Well, that's what it sounds like. | ||
| Interesting. I never thought about that. | ||
| Here's the question. What technology generated that recording? | ||
| I've done mic'd up interviews. | ||
| I've done surreptitious recordings. | ||
| Does that sound like a mic? | ||
| It sounds like a mic on a person. | ||
| Like a taped up mic? Like you could say like No, you're not going to do that. | ||
| So we use different technologies. We use watches and keychains. | ||
| Okay, gotcha, gotcha. So there's ways that you can do it. | ||
| Now, some of them are directional. Some of them are better than others. | ||
| But federal technology is not the most incredible audio recording. | ||
| The clearest voice in that entire recording was Donald Trump, to me. | ||
| Everyone else sounded like they were background noise. | ||
| So there's a couple things that could be done. | ||
| One, was it a FISA? Did they exploit a microphone on his own phone, right? | ||
| Did they have a mic in that room that was, you know, put there through either a Title III authority, which would be a wiretap, or through the foreign intelligence surveillance? | ||
| Is that a possibility? Was it a consensual wire that was being worn by somebody that had come in? | ||
| But why was it directly? | ||
| It sounded directional and that it picked up Trump the clearest and most dominant. | ||
| And I don't think he was the most dominant voice by volume. | ||
| I think it was most dominant either by proximity or because it was aimed. | ||
| So that just brings up a lot of questions to me. | ||
| How did they get that authority? Was it something that somebody was doing consensually? | ||
| Or did they exploit, like, let's say they were in a conference room, right? | ||
| And you got those mics in the center of the room? | ||
| Yeah, right. They pick up your conference call? | ||
| Was it one of those? | ||
| Which can easily be hacked into. | ||
| You know, especially if you have the legal authority to do so. | ||
| Yeah. So, and then you'd have to go back and like, why do they have that? | ||
| So I just want to know more things about where that recording came from, what circumstances led to it being recorded, and then what the heck was he looking at? | ||
| Because it's not a smoking gun to release that. | ||
| It is obviously a good smoke screen for CNN to go out there and do their exclusive play. | ||
| Well, and I guess you could even talk about We're good to go. | ||
| And we can maybe think, because to me, he's clearly there with a writer who doubted his account on the Iran situation with Milley. | ||
| And he's saying, look, here's the proof right here. | ||
| And the writer's like, oh, gee, yeah, you're right. | ||
| And he's like, yeah, see, you didn't believe me. | ||
| Right. So Trump wants people to see that document. | ||
| So if they have to bring it into the court case... | ||
| And the other thing is this. It's Trump, right? | ||
| So you look at Trump's actions and you look at his words. | ||
| They don't always line up. | ||
| He'll say a lot of things like lock her up. | ||
| Like a politician, huh? It turns out he said some things that he didn't do. | ||
| Like a damn politician. It's just a thing that people do when they're in that situation. | ||
| Darn it. All right. We got to take another break. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. Who knows where we'll be in four minutes from now? | ||
| All right. We're getting into another interesting angle. | ||
| So we'll see what happens here. We do have the Trump tape. | ||
| We may do some live analysis here. | ||
| But you're talking about an interesting agent who's been involved in the Whitmer fake kidnapping, January 6th, moving on to all these things, and then something weird that happened with his career that's not exactly so common that we're talking about right now with Kyle Serafin, a little inside baseball here. | ||
| But I want to just... | ||
| Let's get to what we were talking about right before we went live. | ||
| I'm watching the Durham hearing last week, and Durham, I actually happen to know some people that know him well, and they're lawyers that were telling me about him, and he's a good guy. | ||
| He's a good guy, keeps his head down, probably has a totally clean record, like, I mean, literally barely even a, probably doesn't even jaywalk type of a person. | ||
| Sure. But I'm watching him during the hearings, and I'm realizing, and I'm not trying to be insulting here, but I'm realizing how ignorant Durham is on major things. | ||
| Like, when Adam Schiff whizzes a fastball by you, you're just totally ignorant. | ||
| And so Adam Schiff is whizzing fastballs by him that Russians hacked the DCCC and Russians gave this to the WikiLeaks. | ||
| And Durham is just like, wait a second, I'm not here to talk about WikiLeaks. | ||
| That's not what I was investigating. | ||
| Yes. And so Schiff is whizzing these fastballs by him looking like Schiff is smarter than Durham. | ||
| That's not the case. Right. | ||
| But you're getting into this Duantano or D'Antuano situation. | ||
| It's a bit of an odd name. And it kind of rings true with that too. | ||
| I don't think Durham is a bad guy. | ||
| I think Durham is a good guy who puts blinders on, does his job, and maybe is just kind of ignorant to his political surroundings, either by choice or because he thinks that makes him more effective at his job. | ||
| But there's a lot of people that are in the system that might not be bad people or corrupt people, | ||
| but maybe unknowingly are doing things that they don't realize what they're doing. | ||
| And so you're talking about DeAntonio here and this weird situation with him now | ||
| leaving the bureaucracy in a way that you've never seen or heard of before. | ||
| It's uncommon. So I'll give a quick anecdote to give context to what we're talking about. | ||
| I had a colleague, worked national security, same amount of tenure as me, West Point grad, good guy, good human being, nice person, good father, all the things, right? | ||
| And we're talking in my boss's office in April of 2022. | ||
| This is one of the FBI offices. | ||
| We're sitting and discussing the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| Which is, you know, something you might do. | ||
| And I'm laughing because it was a biggie small song that someone had mixed to a bunch of, like, the drug doing, you know, and the measuring. | ||
| With Hunter in it? Yeah, yeah, the whole thing. | ||
| So I'm watching this. But you love memes. | ||
| And I'm sitting here and I'm telling my boss about it and he's laughing and we're discussing it and this guy walks in and he goes, oh, what's that? | ||
| And I explain, oh, that's from Hunter Biden's laptop. | ||
| He's like, is this new information? | ||
| Like, what is this? It's like, dude, it's 2022. | ||
| How do you not know that this has been out there in the public sphere for two years? | ||
| The FBI had it for three. We didn't hear about it. | ||
| I heard about it like you did, like through the public. | ||
| But he didn't know. | ||
| And so there's a lot of compartmented willful ignorance. | ||
| I think it's because people are trying to do their job. | ||
| They're trying to keep their head down. They're trying not to be political. | ||
| I think Durham is a great example of that sort of thing. | ||
| I think that he was trying to be fair and balanced. | ||
| But the problem is, if you're trying to play by the rules and be fair and balanced, when the rules have been thrown out the window, I did a whole podcast called Calvin Ball. | ||
| You familiar with Calvin Ball? I don't think so. | ||
| So Calvin and Hobbes is a famous cartoon. | ||
| Oh, right, yeah. That was my favorite growing up. | ||
| He got sick of playing regular organized sports, so he created Calvin Ball. | ||
| And that was basically like the only rule to the game was is that every rule has to change every game. | ||
| Except that he always wins. | ||
| So it's always just different. | ||
| It was new. And so it could be played with wickets or balls or mallets or whatever. | ||
| So that's Calvin Ball. | ||
| That's what they're playing. And Durham is still playing baseball according to, you know, the rules that are written down have been forever. | ||
| Steve D'Antuano did something that is very unusual. | ||
| He was the assistant director of the Washington field office. | ||
| As you mentioned, he used to be the special agent in charge of the Detroit field office that ran the Whitmer case. | ||
| Did he run that thing? No. | ||
| Did he approve the big stuff on it? | ||
| Yes. So that's how that works out. | ||
| It's like I mentioned, CEO, you know, the branch manager is the person that's down there that's actually running the squad, and then you've got your employees that are actually doing the work. | ||
| So the agents at least would have at some point in time been briefed up to DeAntuano. | ||
| He also ran the... | ||
| He ran the field office in Washington, D.C. that handled both January 6th, which makes people alerted. | ||
| He also was the guy that gave the final approval on going after Mar-a-Lago and doing that raid. | ||
| And then, interestingly enough, they named a successor to him, and he retired from that job. | ||
| Now, when you're the assistant director of the Washington field office, there's three big jobs where you know you are going to go somewhere further in the Bureau. | ||
| If you make it to the top of New York's field office, if you make it to the top of Washington, D.C., or if you make it to the top of Los Angeles, those are all assistant director jobs. | ||
| That's like the launch platform you want to get. | ||
| That's rocket fuel. Yeah, you are on the platform to launch into the stratosphere. | ||
| You will be in the seventh floor. | ||
| Almost exclusively, that is the case. | ||
| Very few people are going to walk away from those jobs and not move further on in the Bureau. | ||
| And he didn't. So the question is, why? | ||
| And I don't know the answer to that, by the way. | ||
| I'm just asking the question because it's weird. | ||
| And people in the Bureau know it's weird. | ||
| But if you don't work for the FBI, you wouldn't know that. | ||
| And you were saying there was a buzz. | ||
| Yeah, because they named his successor, which also never happens. | ||
| The standard move is when you retire from the Bureau, especially one of those higher | ||
| level jobs, special agent in charge, assistant director jobs, what happens is they will let | ||
| you retire. | ||
| They will let someone come in in the interim and they will be called an acting. | ||
| They will be the acting assistant director, acting special agent in charge, whatever. | ||
| It gives somebody another leadership opportunity, right? | ||
| It allows someone to try that job on and they pick somebody out of their kind of small field | ||
| to try it and then they decide whether or not they're going to confirm them in that | ||
| role. | ||
| That didn't happen. | ||
| His successor was named in advance. | ||
| That's strange. And now we're seeing, and he's gone into the private sector and he works for KPMG, which is a big accounting firm, and he's an accountant, but probably hasn't done accounting in 20 years because he was an FBI agent, right? | ||
| So that's not very common. Now, he's coming forward and saying, by the way, the pipe bombs were not legit. | ||
| They were not actual functional explosive devices. | ||
| By the way... One of many oddities and things that make no sense with those. | ||
| Correct. And then the second thing is that he came out and said, you know, I didn't approve. | ||
| I thought it was a bad idea to go and raid Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| In fact, I suggested that we get consent, which, by the way, that is the right move. | ||
| He's saying the correct thing. | ||
| Why did the guy who was at the top of the food chain in that field office not have the final say on what the actual operational decision was? | ||
| Why was someone below him making that call? | ||
| That's weird. These things should be addressed. | ||
| These are the things that the weaponization committee should be hearing. | ||
| And we put it to him as best we can. | ||
| Like me and my little band of whistleblowers, we call ourselves the Suspendables. | ||
| Kind of like the Sly Stallone movie, right? | ||
| We got suspended forever from our jobs. | ||
| And the Suspendables are pushing this stuff forward. | ||
| We're prominent in that report, by the way. | ||
| You guys are probably responsible for this report. | ||
| A big chunk of it, yeah. I read that when it came out, you know, stuff like that. | ||
| So, that's the CISA one. | ||
| So, we were in the first one, big time. | ||
| And this one I haven't read yet. I know it just dropped. | ||
| Just came out, yeah. So, end of the day, we're out there giving this information. | ||
| And so you go, what... | ||
| What is going on in the Bureau? | ||
| These are the people you should be asking. | ||
| They said, hey, do you have a hit list or a dream list of interviews? | ||
| And the answer is yes. The question is, would you let us come in here and write some of your questions for you? | ||
| And that hasn't happened yet. But people like Matt Gaetz are actually receptive to what we're saying. | ||
| They're saying, who are the people we should be talking to? | ||
| What do we ask them? And what are the Bureau policies that are actually in play? | ||
| Because they don't know the policies. We used to live under them. | ||
| Me and my buddies did. So that's the value we're trying to bring to America. | ||
| So I do want to get your analysis on the Trump tape. | ||
| But let me ask you this. | ||
| Yep. So Christopher Wray comes out and says they can't unmask the Biden whistleblower because they're afraid for his life. | ||
| Sure. Do you believe that's true? | ||
| I believe that is a canned answer because he gave the same canned answers. | ||
| It's going to be one of the two on the Bigno card. | ||
| Ongoing investigation, sources and method. | ||
| That's what he said. He gave you both, actually, in one sentence when he said that. | ||
| So... So, no, I don't believe him. | ||
| Like, here you want to hear Chris Wray's tell, because I used to play poker. | ||
| His tell is when he says, full stop. | ||
| He says that, that's what you know? | ||
| That's false. It's like when Biden says, I ain't lying, or what does Biden say? | ||
| Correct. Yes, Biden, he says, not joking, or, you know, not gonna, you know, what he's... | ||
| I forget, he's always got the one that he says, I'm not kidding you, or I'm not lying to you, or something like that. | ||
| Correct. Whenever, Biden's is very, very obvious. | ||
| It's like an old person tell. Chris Reyes is a little bit more sophisticated when he says full stop. | ||
| We kind of go like, okay, we've sort of landed on that. | ||
| Me and five other guys that worked in the Bureau were like, hmm. | ||
| When he says those things, those are not genuine statements. | ||
| So what do you think the reason is? | ||
| Because to me it would be, yeah, you don't want to unmask your informant for obvious reasons, but okay, what do you think is really going on And I guess, let me rephrase that. | ||
| We're about to go to break, of course, because I'm sitting here and I'm like, you know, I could see from Ray's standpoint, if I'm giving Ray the benefit of the doubt, well, maybe he doesn't trust members of Congress. | ||
| Maybe he's curious that there's people in Congress that he doesn't trust. | ||
| Before the break, comment on that. | ||
| Ray made $9.2 million a year before he became the FBI director. | ||
| He makes $235,000 a year right now. | ||
| Why would you do that move? That's number one. | ||
| Well, he loves the country, obviously. | ||
| He loves the country so much. The second thing, and probably the most important thing is this. | ||
| The FBI is an intelligence agency first. | ||
| Intelligence agencies do not give up their information for free. | ||
| They fight FOIA. They fight any kind of disclosure. | ||
| So everything that they do when it comes to transparency is antithetical to the type of work they do. | ||
| So you're not buying... | ||
| The notion that maybe Ray is distrusting of members of Congress that are looking into this? | ||
| No, I think that he's defending the Bureau because that's what he works for right now. | ||
| That's his job. That's where he's in place to do. | ||
| All right, Kyle Serafin is my guest. | ||
| Let's also let people know where they can find your podcast as well on the other side of this break. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. | ||
| All right, we got big news that we're about to break. | ||
| In fact, let me just make sure. | ||
| How long can you stay? | ||
| As long as you need. This is just great. | ||
| We've got some big news that we're going to have. | ||
| Kyle's about to break some big news here. | ||
| I'm really excited about what he's doing because really, in a way, you're groundbreaking in that you have paved a way here. | ||
| You've opened the doors, built the staircase, if you will, for other whistleblowers to have the confidence and the ways and means to come forward. | ||
| And I think as well, you finally got the allies in Congress. | ||
| You mentioned Matt Gaetz and others that are helping with this as well. | ||
| So I want to just tease. | ||
| We'll get more into that later. | ||
| Quickly, though, tell people where they can find your podcast, and then let's get into the Trump case. | ||
| But tell people where they can find your podcast. | ||
| All right. So we do live Rumble. | ||
| We do it at rumble.com slash Kyle Serafin. | ||
| So it's just my full name. They can find it usually on Twitter as well. | ||
| We tease out all the links on there. | ||
| And then you can go to Apple or Spotify or iHeartRadio or you name it, whatever, like anything that's the Kyle Serafin Show. | ||
| So if you type in my name, you'll find me pretty much everywhere for that. | ||
| Have you had Agent Friend on with you? | ||
| Oh, yeah. In fact, we do a segment regularly called Friendly Fridays where I bring him on weekly. | ||
| Okay, good, good. I actually talked it into his contract. | ||
| So he's getting paid by a company or a group called the Center for Renewing America. | ||
| And one of his jobs is to do media. | ||
| And I said, he's got to get it all pre-approved, right? | ||
| He's got to go and run it through his publicist and all that. | ||
| Because that's a 501C? Correct. | ||
| Okay. And I said, what about me? | ||
| He goes, no, no, you have a blanket approval. | ||
| I can always go on the Kyle Serafin show. | ||
| You've got the grandfather clause. | ||
| I've got the grandfather clause. So I said, let's do that. | ||
| Let's make you part of our regular thing. | ||
| So it's actually part of his job to show up and talk to my audience as well. | ||
| So we get his takes. | ||
| And the fun thing about Steve is this, because I never met Steve when we worked in the Bureau together. | ||
| You know, we worked at the same time, but not together, if that makes sense. | ||
| That's just, there's so many agents you just never crossed paths. | ||
| Yeah, there's like almost 14,000. So like, you know, he was in Nebraska, and then he was in Florida, and I was in Washington, D.C., and I went to 20 different field offices doing stuff. | ||
| There's no big FBI conference where all you guys come and hang out in the lodge? | ||
| Yeah, like the ice cream social. Yeah, yeah. | ||
| Doesn't happen. Doesn't happen. | ||
| If you happen to be... You have an ice cream cone, there's a microphone in it. | ||
| You're like all trying to get dirt on one another. | ||
| That's right. So here's what's funny. Actually, I found out Steve was at the FBI Academy doing SWAT training when I was going through to become a new agent. | ||
| We had an offset of like two years. | ||
| So anyway, Steve is that guy. | ||
| And one of the things I like most about Steve is he's very... | ||
| So very complimentary there. | ||
| It turns out. And then here's the thing. | ||
| Our names were revealed in public the same day with no coordination. | ||
| His name was dropped by Miranda Devine the same day that Dan Bongino started teasing out my name. | ||
| So we both went public without knowing each other at the same time. | ||
| So that wasn't even coordinated? | ||
| Not at all. I found his phone number 12 hours after he went public. | ||
| I had people on it. | ||
| I was like, give me that guy's cell phone number. | ||
| I called him and I was almost in tears. | ||
| And I said, I don't know you. | ||
| You're not alone. That's it. | ||
| I just want one guy to have my back. | ||
| And I told him, I was like, any door, whether metaphorical or literal, that you want to go through anywhere in this world, I got you. | ||
| I'll be your number two. And there might be some more people coming forward as well with the big news that we're going to talk about coming up. | ||
| But let's play the Trump tape. Let's get a live... | ||
| Have you done this live before? | ||
| What's that, listen to it? Yeah. | ||
| No. So this is an exclusive. | ||
| We've got an exclusive for you. Kyle Serafin going to give a live breakdown, myself as well here, of the Trump tape. | ||
| So again, this gets leaked to CNN. Oh, what a coincidence CNN gets the leak, just like they knew Roger Stone was going to get the guns-drawn raid at 4 a.m. | ||
| in the morning. I'm sure it's all just a coincidence. | ||
| Nothing suspicious there at all. | ||
| Nothing bad about giving out, like, ongoing prosecution. | ||
| Well, as long as it's into Trump. That's correct. | ||
| As long as it's into Trump. If it's into Biden, this is an ongoing investigation. | ||
| We can't comment if it's into Trump. | ||
| Here, what do you guys want to see? We'll give it to you. | ||
| So here's the leaked audio given to CNN, aired last night, right after a brand new Biden whistleblower comes out. | ||
| CNN, they've probably had this for years, folks. | ||
| But here it is. Let's get the live Kyle Serafin analysis. | ||
| By the way, if you want to pause it, just say, hey, let's pause it right here. | ||
| The crew will pause it and you can comment. | ||
| So I'm going to give you... Yeah, let me prep the listener to listen for this. | ||
| Go ahead. I want you to listen to the quality of the microphone. | ||
| We have to decide whether or not it was boosted audio, specifically of Trump, although everybody in the room is relevant, or whether it was a directional microphone that is somehow either closer in proximity to Trump, on Trump, or aimed at Trump in some specific way. | ||
| So I want you to listen to the quality of the audio and the volume. | ||
| So let me ask you this then, technically speaking, for context, omni-directional mic means it can record from all directions. | ||
| Directional mic means it's just one direction. | ||
| It's kind of like this microphone is right at my mouth, but this has different settings. | ||
| There's a cone of capture for people to understand. | ||
| Just so people understand. So this is significant because Ari, for you, does this mean, okay, it's either coming from a phone or it's coming from a recording device? | ||
| Like, how do you, is that how you identify? | ||
| That's what I'm listening for. Okay. | ||
| And I don't know the answer. We don't know the answer. | ||
| What we know is that there's some clues in the way that it picks up. | ||
| But listen to the highest quality audio, the most direct capture, and then we have to ask the questions right after that. | ||
| All right, so you're going to be in editorial control now. | ||
| If you want to pause it, just say pause. | ||
| The crew will pause it and then play it when you're ready. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here's the leaked Trump tape. These are bad, sick people. | |
| That was your coup, you know, against you. | ||
| Well, it started right at 30. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like when Millie's talking about, oh, you were going to try to do a coup. | |
| No, they were trying to do that before you even were sworn in. | ||
| That's right. Trying to overthrow your election. | ||
| Well, with Millie, let me see that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'll show you an example. He said that... | |
| Was it right there? I wanted... | ||
| So what we're hearing is shuffling papers, which is not going to be the loudest sound of the room. | ||
| We're hearing the most dominant voice is Trump. | ||
| We're hearing it in the earpiece. It's not nearly as clear as when you hear it in stereo. | ||
| But when you hear it in stereo, what you can tell is, is that the most dominant voice of all these things is Trump. | ||
| So we have to know, did they boost it? | ||
| We're hearing the papers are very, very prominent, which insinuates at least the possibility that the microphone is either pointed at or is closest to Donald Trump. | ||
| So my questions are the following. | ||
| Is it a Title III? Did they use wiretap statues? | ||
| This is a criminal investigation possibility. | ||
| Is it a FISA that they're using? | ||
| Did they exploit a microphone? | ||
| Did they place a microphone? Are they using an existing microphone there? | ||
| Or did somebody come in with what's called one-party consent? | ||
| And he was in Bedminster, right? So that's in New Jersey. | ||
| You can do that in Bedminster and in Texas as well. | ||
| Even on private property? For sure, 100%. | ||
| So one-party consent is the rule. | ||
| And so that means that you could be wearing a recording device as long as the recording device... | ||
| It captures a conversation that you are partied to as one of the parties. | ||
| If I'm recording you, for example, I could do that. | ||
| Because you don't have to know. I know, and we're both talking. | ||
| But if I come and I put it in a conversation that I'm not part of, I leave it. | ||
| Meaning you're not talking. I drop it on the, let's say I have a keychain, all right? | ||
| Or I have a credit card that has a recording in it. | ||
| And I drop it on your desk, and I leave the room. | ||
| They have that, credit card recorders? | ||
| Sure, yeah. Or that size, right? | ||
| Speaking of this credit card, speaking of this. | ||
| What the hell? Yeah, and sometimes it's the best way to get those things done. | ||
| You can put them in a pocket. You can put them into a folder. | ||
| You might put it in a folder. It looks like a business card or something to that effect. | ||
| So there's all kinds of different technologies. | ||
| They wire in cameras and different things. | ||
| Anything you've seen in a spy, a lot of these things you can buy commercially. | ||
| They're not just for federal government use by any means. | ||
| But let's say I were to drop that in on you and your producer, and then I walk out. | ||
| Well, now I'm doing a zero party consent because you didn't consent to be recorded and neither did he. | ||
| So nobody knows it's being consent. | ||
| So in this case, it could be a legal one party consent, but that means you have a human informant. | ||
| So that's the question for me. So how about this then? | ||
| Or is it electronic? So before we go back to the tape, because to me, as I'm listening to, you're right, the papers actually seem to be picking up the most clear sound. | ||
| So could it be a situation where, let's say Trump has his phone on the desk like this, and he's just shuffling around? | ||
| 100%. And it's just like this, because when you hear it, I think you can tell there's the least amount of echo when Trump is talking. | ||
| Yes. So that means it's at least pointed at Trump or the closest to Trump. | ||
| Agreed. It seems like the sound is actually picking up the paper sound louder than anything else, making me think it's sitting on a desk. | ||
| Yep. I don't know why that's relevant. | ||
| I just know that these are the questions that I have. | ||
| We talked about the idea of theater of the mind, and that's what I'm looking at. | ||
| I close my eyes. I listen to the recording. | ||
| What do I see when I'm hearing? | ||
| And this is old school radio stuff. | ||
| That's the way I actually grew up. I grew up listening to overnight radio, so it's kind of funny that that's part of the game. | ||
| But you wonder, is it closest to those papers? | ||
| Is that relevant at all? | ||
| I don't know. And there are technologies that we can use, we being the federal government, to exploit telephones. | ||
| You can just tap into my phone sitting on the desk. | ||
| We can all imagine it. | ||
| Well, those are Israeli spyware technologies that exist, right? | ||
| They're made by a company. | ||
| It's a three-letter acronym. It starts with N. Your producers can probably look it up. | ||
| And they create two different technology suites. | ||
| One of them is for non-US-based phones. | ||
| It's called Pegasus. | ||
| It was a big break, and they talked about it in Wired Magazine. | ||
| Was that Snowden that somebody released? | ||
| No, this is post-Snowden. As far as I recall. | ||
| Was it WikiLeaks? Somebody leaked the whole Pegasus. | ||
| Well, here's the thing. I know Bongino covered it. | ||
| I was on his show on Fox talking about it at one point. | ||
| But it's old technology. | ||
| It's been there since like 2014, 2015. | ||
| So I think it's after Snowden, but it's an Israeli technology. | ||
| But then here's the other thing. They created one for just domestic U.S.-based phones. | ||
| And that's called Phantom. | ||
| And so everybody's... The government is good at this. | ||
| You talk about why are they not showing this information. | ||
| They're really big on the laser pointer theory. | ||
| And the laser pointer is this. You ever seen a cat chase a laser pointer on the ground? | ||
| Right? You put the laser and the dot goes over there. | ||
| Where's the dot coming from? | ||
| It comes from your hand. But what's the cat attacking? | ||
| The carpet. So it pounces on this dot. | ||
| Then you move it over here. It pounces on the dot. | ||
| It's never going to get the thing because the originating source is far away. | ||
| Federal government's big on that sleight of hand type stuff. | ||
| They love it. It's like, oh, like Pegasus. | ||
| Oh, yeah, get outraged. End of the day, did you ever use Pegasus under oath? | ||
| Director of the FBI. No, we never use that. | ||
| Why? Because it doesn't actually work for U.S.-based phones. | ||
| Jim Clapper, we never wittingly spy on the people. | ||
| Correct. It's all about word games. | ||
| This is an attorney. This is a guy who says certain things very specifically. | ||
| And as well, we're about to have a short break here. | ||
| Is it also one of those instances where, because this is what they did to Trump originally, Oh, we're not. | ||
| It's NSO, and your folks brought it up. It's NSO is the name of the group. | ||
| They're an Israeli spyware company. | ||
| It's a cyber tool. It's a cyber warfare tool. | ||
| We're not spying on Donald Trump. | ||
| Oh, it's Israel spying on Donald Trump. | ||
| And then we just exchanged information with Israel. | ||
| Correct. And that's how they get around all these different laws. | ||
| So we're about to take another break. | ||
| This is a short break. We'll be right back on the other side with Kyle Serafin. | ||
| We're breaking down the Trump tape and getting his expert analysis, what he thinks is going on. | ||
| I think we both concur, though. | ||
| It sounds like a mic is on the desk. | ||
| Closest to Trump and the papers seem to be making the most noise. | ||
| We're breaking down the leaked Trump tape, which isn't the leaking of it a crime in and of itself? | ||
| You would think. Potentially. | ||
| Yeah, potentially. But it was probably leaked by a Democrat, so we all know how that goes. | ||
| It's hard to say whether it's the FBI that's doing this kind of stuff or whether it's DOJ. My instinct leans towards DOJ. I have much less faith in what they do compared to what the Bureau does. | ||
| That's not to say the Bureau doesn't have its problems. | ||
| It does, clearly, which we can see. | ||
| But sort of the out-and-out destruction, because that could potentially compromise your case. | ||
| And so people tend to be a little bit more... | ||
| The other thing is this. There's a thing called Giglio material. | ||
| You familiar with this? No. Supreme Court decision. | ||
| Goes back 40, 50 years now, maybe. | ||
| And what it says is if you've ever done something that's been documented that would discredit your testimony... | ||
| You no longer can testify. | ||
| Like leaking evidence or leaking an investigation. | ||
| Or lied under oath or done anything to that effect. | ||
| Setting up framing somebody. | ||
| Right. Or receive money from a Russian or from an Albanian like Charles McGonigal. | ||
| Like when you've done something like that, it permanently impugns your honor. | ||
| And then before you can testify again, you have to give that to the defense. | ||
| And so the idea that you would have Giglio material is actually, it ends your career. | ||
| You know, you're no longer functional as a federal agent. | ||
| So if it is somebody, it's going to be like an admin or a support type person or somebody who's an administrator that's gone far enough up that they're never going to testify again. | ||
| It's just, you know, you start playing the odds. | ||
| That's what we're talking about here. Yeah, and I do want to play the odds with you. | ||
| We'll finish the tape. But it's funny because I just have a weird feeling nobody's going to be demanding an investigation or finding out who leaked the tape. | ||
| Which you'd think would be a bigger story. | ||
| Where was the Dobbs decision? Who leaked that? | ||
| We should be able to find that out. Oh, yeah. | ||
| Oh, they know. But see, they don't have to be called in for hearings. | ||
| That's not anything. But if Trump farted on a kitten or something, they'd have to have a full-on investigation. | ||
| We've got kitten protection laws in this country we've got to go after. | ||
| Yeah, Trump chemically bombed. | ||
| Interstate kitten protection. | ||
| Trump actually, he chemically bombed a litter of kittens, folks. | ||
| We have it on tape. But let's go back, seriously, let's go back to this Trump tape. | ||
| We're doing analysis here with Cal Serafin. | ||
| Guys, play where we left it off. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Iran. Isn't it amazing? | |
| I have a big pile of papers. | ||
| This thing just came up. Look. | ||
| This was him. They presented me this. | ||
| This is off the record, but they presented me this. | ||
| This was him. This was the Defense Department. | ||
| So we'll pause it right there. And what he's saying, right? | ||
| He's saying, we're looking at something. | ||
| We don't know what they're looking at. But to me, it could either be, it was presented to me, right? | ||
| He says it was presented to me by the Department of Defense. | ||
| So, was Trump presented and is he breaking out like maps? | ||
| Is he unfurling a battle plan here? | ||
| Because that's what the allegation sort of is. | ||
| Yeah. Or is he looking at emails that said, hey, we think you should do this. | ||
| Or just a briefing that somebody brought. | ||
| He says they brought. Somebody just sits a briefing on his desk. | ||
| It happens here all the time. Somebody sits a news story on my desk. | ||
| Correct. And that doesn't necessarily, even though it may have information in it. | ||
| And Bongino, actually, we talked about Dan Bongino, who's a friend of mine now and has been really supportive of what we've been doing. | ||
| Bongino breaks it out in his podcast today, which people could listen to and find out that what he says is it's really important. | ||
| You could show somebody something. | ||
| Like, I could say, you see this? | ||
| And you'd go, oh yeah. And what did you see? | ||
| You saw there was a piece of paper and there was a photo. | ||
| It's the quarter test. Could you tell me? | ||
| Yeah, exactly right. Could you tell me what numbers were on here? | ||
| Could you actually do anything? So did you look at it or did you just see it? | ||
| And so did you digest that information? | ||
| It's really relevant, I think. | ||
| Whether or not these people saw, he's like, hey, look at this thing. | ||
| So we don't even know what's going on in the background there. | ||
| And he's ruffling papers, obviously the recording closest to him. | ||
| It sounds like those people have some distance. | ||
| They're not like in his pocket, right? | ||
| Because we have different audio levels. | ||
| We know there's some distance. | ||
| And there's nothing really blocking the microphone either. | ||
| The microphone is out. | ||
| Once again, theater of the mind type stuff. | ||
| But end of the day, the question is always going to be this. | ||
| What did they see? What was he showing? | ||
| Do they have proof of that beyond a reasonable doubt? | ||
| Can you show that this was a battle plan or that was something that was classified? | ||
| And then Trump also is kind of a clout guy. | ||
| He kind of says some things and it's all about how does it sound and look and, you know, is very, very good and all that. | ||
| He's a superlative, hyperbole tied to dude. | ||
| That's what Trump does. | ||
| So the idea that he is talking about something, you know, saying it's classified or secretive or hasn't been declassified because it adds some exclusivity to talking to Trump, kind of what he does in a charming way. | ||
| Some people find it very off-putting. | ||
| I find it neutral. It's like I just know that that's a thing that he does. | ||
| And so, here's their big problem, and I want to get into this on the other side of the break, because I think I know what their big problem is, but I want to hear if you agree. | ||
| So, Again, though, this is just audio. | ||
| We don't know what the document is. | ||
| We don't know who's seeing the document. | ||
| So it's a bunch of we don't know, and this is a big problem. | ||
| So why would they release this audio tape? | ||
| Well, we've identified that. It's to distract from the Biden whistleblowers. | ||
| But there's some other angles we'll get into with Cal Seraphim. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. Short break. | ||
| Short break. Don't go anywhere. Well, this is interesting. | ||
| I'm glad we mentioned this in the break because I'm saying, why are the feds so desperate for this tape? | ||
| But you're reminding me the audio recording comes from Bedminster. | ||
| That's in New Jersey. The security footage they were desperate to get was from Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| So briefly, before we go back to the tape here, explain why you think they were so desperate for the security footage from Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| I think it was embarrassing. I think it was highly embarrassing. | ||
| So the story is, and we haven't had strong confirmation, but it's been sort of loosely reported, was that the FBI used the hostage rescue team and elements of the Miami SWAT team to go in and secure Miralago. | ||
| Now, when everyone, if they've never had a search warrant at their house, which is probably good, what happens is there's a knock, and then you send in a tactical team if you were doing a SWAT search, a SWAT They will come in and they will hold the physical space by running guys in with rifles that are wearing military-looking uniforms, helmets, comms, the whole deal. | ||
| So you're not moving, you're not doing anything, hiding anything? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. They're going to come in and they're going to make sure that place is physically safe. | ||
| And then once that is physically secured, then they send in a search team. | ||
| And those are the people you might see that are wearing the raid jackets and wearing the khaki pants and all that kind of deal, right? | ||
| So there's two different elements when you have a tactical search team come in and do that security. | ||
| I think that there's a possibility, and my buddy keeps agitating. | ||
| He's like, hey, can you get those Trump tapes and maybe you and Steve Friend could do a tactical breakdown of when they broke policy, when they look like fools, when they flagged each other, whatever might have happened. | ||
| Or when they plant evidence? | ||
| So HRT is incredibly good at what they do, and I will not impugn the capabilities of them. | ||
| I don't think they made tactical errors. | ||
| There's a very low probability of that. | ||
| However, what you would have is the optic of men that are basically rolling in to, like, ballrooms that have, you know, nice floors. | ||
| And when you do searches like this, you're usually going into horrible places, like where the walls are crawling with roaches. | ||
| Like couches that are going to be condemned afterwards. | ||
| Correct. Correct. Like, I've gone upstairs that we didn't let anybody who weighed more than 200 pounds up the stairs because you could see daylight through the stairwell because it was, you know, ripped apart and the floors were falling. | ||
| You've got a beautiful place in Mar-a-Lago. | ||
| You've got this place where they hold ballrooms. | ||
| They've got, you know, crystal chandeliers. | ||
| People living there, members hanging out. | ||
| Correct. And you're going to send these dudes in for that? | ||
| That would look very embarrassing to me. | ||
| And you make the kind of statement, it looks like maybe a Pablo Escobar scenario kind of deal. | ||
| But also, it just looks absurd. | ||
| Because it's American soil, and you're sending in this tactical team, and the Secret Service guards that place on the regular. | ||
| That would be an embarrassment, I would think, from the Bureau's standard. | ||
| That's why you would want those. I think Trump is concerned, and maybe this is an outlier, But this is why the video evidence would be so key. | ||
| Maybe Trump's concerned they planted evidence. | ||
| Maybe Trump's concerned they framed him. | ||
| Well, and we saw pictures. | ||
| And I've never seen anybody do anything to that effect. | ||
| I would never make that allegation because it's outside of my experience range. | ||
| So I think that would be a low probability. | ||
| But I can't rule anything out. | ||
| Possibilities exist, but not probable to me. | ||
| But what we did see was, you know, they have some of these pictures where things are all splayed out. | ||
| They splayed those things out on the floor. | ||
| The highly confidential things. | ||
| They took the picture. And none of those things are highly confidential. | ||
| Those are all what are called cover sheets. | ||
| Those were splayed out on my desk when I worked at the Washington field office, working counterintelligence. | ||
| They were on my desk because there's nothing classified about having a document that says classified. | ||
| It's just optics. It literally tells you that the thing underneath it is supposed to be classified. | ||
| I could go back here, take out a cardboard box, put it on the ground and say, look, documents. | ||
| Correct. And so did they do these things like the hero shot when you see them do like a raid, you know, on a highway patrol? | ||
| Like a trophy deal? Exactly. Everyone stands out there like real tough and, you know, they've got this thing going on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We got the documents. Yeah, yeah. Look at all the, we got dope, we got guns, we got documents, we got boxes. | |
| That's what it looked like to me. | ||
| And so like how much of that was staged, how much time went into that staging, that would be embarrassing to see. | ||
| How much money? I mean, geez. | ||
| Well, here's the other thing that's really absurd. | ||
| We talked about Steve DeAntuano. | ||
| They flew a search team from Washington field office, from my old office, down to Miami, a place where they have plenty of FBI agents. | ||
| How many members would usually be on a team like that? | ||
| It depends on the size of the facility. | ||
| I mean, they might recruit 20, they might recruit 30. | ||
| My understanding was it was like 20 or 30 people. | ||
| But not a cheap tab. No, they send them all down their commercial, so it doesn't cost a ton of money. | ||
| The Bureau writes its own checks, right? | ||
| It's an $11 billion a year federal agency, so they don't care. | ||
| They're not trying to run it like a business, like you are. | ||
| They don't care about the cost. | ||
| And the funny thing is this. Miami is the fifth biggest field office, if memory serves. | ||
| It's one of the five biggest field offices in the Bureau. | ||
| They've got literally probably close to 1,000 FBI agents. | ||
| Maybe they have 800, 700, something like that. | ||
| Washington Field has slightly more. | ||
| You flew agents from one place to another. | ||
| Why? Generally, what we do is we cut what's called a lead. | ||
| I send a lead down to you. | ||
| You work in Miami. You get the lead. | ||
| Okay, we're serving a search warrant. Okay, make sure you send me the document. | ||
| Send me the different attachments that I'm going to have. | ||
| Attachment A and B tells me where I'm going and what's going to be there and what I'm looking for. | ||
| And then they go serve the search warrant. | ||
| It's totally irrelevant. Every agent, in theory, can substitute the job of every other agent. | ||
| They've all been trained to do the proper rate. | ||
| Interviews can be done by anybody. The evidence collection can be done by anybody. | ||
| And they have special teams that are called evidence response teams, ERT. And they send those people to go do that so everything is done by the book. | ||
| And they're trained all over the fields. | ||
| You know, there's 56 field offices. | ||
| They all get the same training. So in other words, it's odd that they flew this team down there. | ||
| Yeah, this is defense 101. | ||
| If you're doing an oversight investigation, that would be a red flag. | ||
| If I'm doing defense for Trump, I'm going to say, did you fly down from Washington field office to Miralago to conduct the search warrant? | ||
| Yes. Have you ever done that in any case before? | ||
| No. Is it common in your experience to have people come in and fly in from another area to go conduct a search? | ||
| No. Why did you do it then? | ||
| Because that's the real question. And what type of paperwork would there be? | ||
| I mean, certainly somebody said, here's why we're doing this. | ||
| Maybe not, but there would be an operational. | ||
| They would basically lay it out in what's called an ops plan, which is called the FD, Federal Document 888. | ||
| And they would look at that and it would say who the personnel are that are going to do the search. | ||
| And then, you know, you have someone like Steve D'Antoine would sign off on that. | ||
| So why? Why did they break what is normal protocol for any other investigation? | ||
| And I get it. It's a sensitive matter because it's the former president. | ||
| So maybe that's the justification. | ||
| And maybe that's really easy. | ||
| Or maybe it's not. And then afterwards, DeAntuano was out. | ||
| Right. After that. | ||
| Not long after. Interesting. | ||
| All right, let's finish up the rest of this Trump tape here. | ||
| We've done a really good job stretching this audio. | ||
| This two minutes of audio. We'll turn this thing into an hour, baby. | ||
| We'll milk this thing for all it's worth. | ||
| I'm not as bad as CNN, but we can compete with him. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, here, go ahead. We looked at something. | |
| This was him. This wasn't done by me. | ||
| This was him. All sorts of stuff. | ||
| It's pages long. Wait a minute. | ||
| Let's see. I just found, isn't that amazing? | ||
| This totally wins my case, you know. | ||
| Except it is highly controversial. | ||
| This is secret information. | ||
| Look at this. You attack. | ||
| Now, here's what's interesting to hear about this to me. | ||
| Pause it real quick. Because, again, there's just so much opening here. | ||
| They're laughing. They're cordial. | ||
| It could have already been declassified. | ||
| Well, moreover, you'll get emails that are Mark's top secret, right? | ||
| But that's only because one line in there or one piece of information has to be secret. | ||
| Right? Not the whole body. | ||
| So there's a thing, the way the federal government works, anyone who's never held a security clearance is going to be totally foreign to you. | ||
| So I'll break it down really easily. There's a top line banner that tells you the overall classification of the document. | ||
| All right? And that will be the highest level classified piece in there will give you the top level banner. | ||
| So top secret, secret, no foreign, which means no foreign governments can see it or no foreign intelligence services can be shared. | ||
| They'll have this level. | ||
| And then there's these dissemination codes. | ||
| So who you can share it with. It'll say five eyes. | ||
| That means you can share it with our five eyes partners. | ||
| It'll say no foreign. That means nobody. | ||
| It'll say like what they'll say, like rel, whatever. | ||
| There's these things who you can release to, who you have to coordinate with to release the information. | ||
| So all these little technical pieces. | ||
| And then underneath the actual body of a document, when it has, you know, written form, and we're looking at the, you know, the CNN version of this thing where it's showing, like, each line, there'll be what they call portion marks. | ||
| And that means that portion, that paragraph or that segment has a specific classification. | ||
| Most of the time, it's unclassified. | ||
| Most secret documents are unclassified in the majority with one small piece or some small pieces, unless it's all transcription from a FISA, let's say. | ||
| So in other words, he could have a seven-page document in front of him, and the only thing classified could be on page seven, and he never even flips through it. | ||
| Correct. And moreover, it's like you can hear how fast he's flipping through these things. | ||
| Are they really looking at these things for content, or are they just seeing that they're, you know, text and whatever else. | ||
| There could be a graphic on there. Some of those things may be classified. | ||
| Some may not be. So it's worth noting they're going to have to establish that these people, that he was exposing it. | ||
| But... The indictment doesn't actually say that he exposed this stuff. | ||
| This is all show. | ||
| Because the indictment said that he improperly retained those documents. | ||
| So the charges aren't that he showed it to somebody. | ||
| Correct. So why is this a relevant document? | ||
| Other than to say he actually did retain it and he had it. | ||
| They're trying to smear him publicly with this audio. | ||
| That's what it seems like to me. | ||
| Yeah, and it's interesting too. Because it's not part of the charges. | ||
| And they don't even know. | ||
| Again, they don't even know... | ||
| I guess they really don't even know if this is the document in question. | ||
| They're just assuming it is. | ||
| We don't know how much. Is there video that goes with this thing? | ||
| Well, I don't think there is. | ||
| If there was, I think they'd release that too. | ||
| Well, that would reveal their source. | ||
| If they had the video? Yeah, I guess the audio doesn't necessarily reveal their source. | ||
| All right, we'll be right back. Let's get into the big news. | ||
| We could extend this Trump tape out for days, probably. | ||
| Let's get into the big news with Kyle Serafin on the other side of this. | ||
| Folks, there's hope for this country. | ||
| There's good people rising up. | ||
| Don't go anywhere. All right, we're having a great time here in studio with Kyle Serafin. | ||
| And I want to talk about your next big project. | ||
| And really, I know you're not in this for fortune or fame, but I think your name needs to be a household name. | ||
| Joe Biden would never give you an award or a medal or anything. | ||
| You probably deserve one. | ||
| But... You're working on something now that is the next level of helping FBI whistleblowers come forward, helping Congress engage in proper oversight. | ||
| And really, you've already had a successful fundraising campaign for this, but you haven't announced your plans for this. | ||
| So why don't you make this announcement? | ||
| You're just deciding to do this. | ||
| You've just announced this. Today is going to be the first time you said you're going to go public. | ||
| This is big news, folks. | ||
| This is the type of stuff that builds the foundations of a free republic once again. | ||
| So it's totally accidental, number one. | ||
| I saw a need, which was that I have two friends now, a guy named Marcus Allen, a guy named Garrett O'Boyle. | ||
| Those are both former FBI agent. | ||
| And O'Boyle had one of the greatest clips of all time. | ||
| If you dissent from this government, the government will crush you. | ||
| Garrett is an awesome human being. | ||
| And he looks like he's this big guy. | ||
| He's like 6'2 and 275. | ||
| He's got that big beard. | ||
| I used to call him our resident Dothraki. | ||
| If people watch Game of Thrones, they know what I'm talking about. | ||
| I mean, he looks like a freaking insurgent. | ||
| And he's very, very thoughtful. | ||
| And he's very methodical. And he's a war veteran. | ||
| And he was a local police officer. | ||
| And he's the kind of guy that I signed up to work with in the FBI. And he and I connected in October maybe of 21. | ||
| So we've been talking for maybe two years now and change. | ||
| And Garrett's family hasn't had a paycheck since he got crushed out. | ||
| There's Garrett on the screen there. | ||
| Garrett's an awesome human being. | ||
| And I wanted to do something for these guys. | ||
| It's really hard to ask for people to give you money, I find. | ||
| Like for me. I don't want people to give me money. | ||
| It makes me uncomfortable. But I can ask for money for my friends. | ||
| And I can ask for money for people I've never met. | ||
| That's easy if the mission is good. | ||
| So we went out on Give, Send, Go and Americans opened their hearts and their wallets and we raised about $560,000 for Garrett and Marcus' family. | ||
| We put the clip of him up there. | ||
| People came out. We had like 11,000 donors. | ||
| It's truly amazing. | ||
| And that was maybe some of the most important whistleblower testimony From the FBI agents, I would say, in the history of the country. | ||
| Yeah, fantastic stuff. And here's the thing. | ||
| They're honest, and there's these great memes of him talking, and they've got to Adam and Goldman trying to trap him in some sort of statement. | ||
| He crushes the dude, and they put the Snoop... | ||
| Yeah, with the blunt that comes down. | ||
| Yeah, with the blunt that comes down, all that stuff. So Garrett is great for all these things. | ||
| And so we raised all this money, 560 grand, that's a lot of money. | ||
| And the question is, I didn't know this because I've never had to raise money for anybody. | ||
| How do you get that to somebody if people give you, because it was in my name, I gathered it on the aggregator. | ||
| And you're not like Hunter Biden, so you've got to go through the proper laws and procedures. | ||
| I better, yeah, right? I've already pissed off the FBI. I'm sure the IRS is on the night. | ||
| If your name was Hunter Biden, just take the money, throw it in the air, and whatever, it's all good. | ||
| Yeah, leave it on the counter. Sure, throw it in a dumpster behind a schoolyard next to your gun. | ||
| You know, whatever it is. Just whatever I want to do. | ||
| Or just take it around the world in a bag. | ||
| But you're not Hunter Biden. I'm not. | ||
| So I've got to figure out the right way to do this. | ||
| So I wrote checks to these guys. | ||
| I posted them on the internet. | ||
| I put them out on Twitter. And I think we had like 500,000 views of this. | ||
| And it was like, I felt really good about it. | ||
| We're going to send these guys checks. I mailed them out. | ||
| Immediately, I have like dozens of inbound DMs. | ||
| Dude, don't do that. You're going to get hit with $80,000 per gift for taxes. | ||
| And it's like, okay. So I told the guys, hey, pump the brakes. | ||
| Are you good? I gave up to the individual limit of personal gift. | ||
| So they, you know, I got like $16,000 to market. | ||
| So they have some breathing room. Let's figure this thing out. | ||
| I end up getting contacted by some folks. | ||
| I'll make it public when it's possible. | ||
| I'm going to give them a vote in it. | ||
| But I told them I would publicize what they did because what they're doing is really good. | ||
| And we are going to create a 501c4 that is able to give them money As needed, with no gift issues. | ||
| And we have a former IRS attorney and now currently works in a non-profit status to be able to do this sort of thing and another attorney that are helping me draft this up. | ||
| And we're going to create a mechanism, a vehicle, to be able to support whistleblowers. | ||
| And then I talked to the guys. I talked to Garrett. | ||
| I talked to Marcus. And I said, look, I've got this money. | ||
| It's your money. We raise it for you guys. | ||
| We'll give it all to you. Or we can leave some in the pot for the next guy. | ||
| And we can make this a thing. And I can fundraise on this. | ||
| And if people want to give money to this foundation, and there's other things that do it, but they're not being run by former FBI guys like me. | ||
| They're not being run by people like Garrett O'Boyle and Marcus Allen. | ||
| And we will take care of our own. | ||
| We will make a whistleblower community that is self-sufficient through the help and generosity of Americans that want to go and put money towards it. | ||
| And these are non-tax deductible, right? | ||
| Like they're going to be writing small gifts. | ||
| We raised this like $2, $25, $100. | ||
| The single biggest gift we have was $5,000. | ||
| And so that's a lot of money, but it's not that much money when it comes to the donation space. | ||
| And people who can afford a $5,000 donation, great. | ||
| If you can afford a $25 donation, we'll take it, we'll aggregate it, and we'll support these guys. | ||
| So if you want to help the whistleblowers, we're going to have that vehicle, and it's being run by someone like me who's going to be totally transparent. | ||
| The lawyer goes, you know, are you going to have any issues with, like, any sunlight on it? | ||
| And I'm like, no, I'll show pictures of my own bank account where I receive it. | ||
| I'll go open up a bank account. | ||
| We'll put pictures of it on the web. | ||
| I've got 90,000 followers on Twitter. | ||
| I'll share it with any of them. Anybody who wants to see it can see it. | ||
| Because I don't care. And I actually believe that this is the future of not just charitable donations, but I think of media as well. | ||
| Because there's so much distrust in media, and what we see is the biggest liars in the history of media, like Rachel Maddow, are the ones making the most money. | ||
| And then everybody else is trying to get crushed, and you're fighting for scraps. | ||
| And I think what you're doing is so brilliant. | ||
| And see, this is, not to get off on a jag here, but this is my big problem with American communists, is... | ||
| They don't understand that if you really are a communist and you actually want your communist system to work, then the free market is your best bet. | ||
| The only place your communism is going to work is in the free market, away from the government. | ||
| Have your own little commune. | ||
| You can all pool your money, and that's fine. | ||
| Do that. That only is going to happen in the free market. | ||
| If you get the government involved, they're going to steal all your money. | ||
| You're going to be broke and poor. So I wish American communists would embrace the free market aspect, because to me, this is... | ||
| I'm not saying you're a communist, obviously you're not. | ||
| What I'm saying is this is the future. | ||
| What stops the average person from maybe doing the right thing, it's that they have a mortgage | ||
| to pay, they've got a family to raise, they've got to put food on the table, and they don't | ||
| want to put that at risk. | ||
| They're self-preserving. | ||
| It's terrifying. | ||
| And so I get that, but you're providing them a safety net, and you're saying, hey, look, | ||
| your concerns are totally understood. | ||
| We're going to make sure that we ease those concerns so that you can do the right thing. | ||
| That's right. Here's the thing. | ||
| My actual supervisor, when I was working in Las Cruces, New Mexico, which is nowhere, by the way. | ||
| It's in the middle of nowhere. It's a tiny little office. | ||
| My boss says, I agree with you. | ||
| My stance on the vaccine was like, no go. | ||
| I'm a pro-life Catholic, so that wasn't happening. | ||
| And he's like, I agree with you. | ||
| And I agree with your right. And yet, I have a mortgage. | ||
| I've got alimony. I've got to take care of those obligations. | ||
| I've got a wife. Ooh, alimony. | ||
| And here's the thing. And I thought, what a sad thing to find out that your honor... | ||
| Because, you know, if you have law enforcement that says that they're willing to lose their life, that's what we all believe, right? | ||
| They put their life on the line. | ||
| How many times do I got to hear that? It sounds like garbage to me because I actually did the job. | ||
| You know, FBI agents don't put their life on the line every day. | ||
| That's absurd. Sometimes they do, but it's really rare, actually. | ||
| So they're saying, you're going to put your life on the line every single day for the American people, but you're not even willing to put your paycheck on the line. | ||
| Let's get real about what this is. | ||
| So that's the real... | ||
| Rubber meets the road situation. | ||
| People have to put food on the table. | ||
| They have to pay their mortgage. They gotta pay their alimony if they happen to. | ||
| There's a lot of federal agents that are divorced for some reason. | ||
| No comment. Look, they got these problems. | ||
| Those are real problems. Those are real concerns. | ||
| Let's address them up front. Let's remove the barriers to entry so you can do the right thing without having to worry about some of the extra stuff, which are real concerns. | ||
| Do I think you should be able to do it without it? | ||
| Yes. Am I going to judge you? No, that's not the kind of guy I am. | ||
| Well, I think this is going to be a big success. | ||
| You haven't really publicly announced this yet. | ||
| So how much infrastructure have you built for this? | ||
| We're building it right now. I've literally talked to attorneys. | ||
| They've sent me an engagement letter that's coming in the mail. | ||
| We are working on... | ||
| That's the vehicle. We've got to figure out a name. | ||
| We've got the website. We've got the Give, Send, Go up, which is Give, Send, Go slash Kyle Serafin, so people can contribute to that if they want. | ||
| It's not tax-deductible. | ||
| It's a gift to the next person, and you can basically look on my face and just say, this is a guy who's going to do the right thing, and I'm going to do the right thing. | ||
| I'm not looking for any of this money. | ||
| It's Monopoly money to me. | ||
| It's not even real. Look at that number. | ||
| It's $603,000. | ||
| That's a crazy amount of money. And good for you because now you're, you mentioned it earlier, you're now a successful podcast host. | ||
| So luckily for you, you can put food on your table and feed your family. | ||
| And now you can pay it forward by having the next FBI whistleblowers come forward and make sure they have a little bit of a safety net for their biggest concern is, can I pay my mortgage and keep food in the fridge for my family? | ||
| All right, let's do one more segment. | ||
| I said this last segment. We're going to do one more segment because there's a big story he wants to talk about. | ||
| Alright, here's what we're going to do now. | ||
| Final segment, and we'll get Kyle out of here. | ||
| He's already been here almost three hours today. | ||
| On with Alex earlier, on with me. | ||
| Just an incredible interview here. | ||
| Well, let's do some political odds-making, but let me just lay out what I have here, and then you give your take. | ||
| I would say that right now Donald Trump is the favorite only because his name is on the board. | ||
| I have it like this right now. I'd say the political oddsmakers, if I'm the political oddsmakers, I have minus 300 for the Democrat nominee, meaning Obama, Michelle Obama or Newsom or whoever they do the bait and switch with, minus 200 for Donald Trump. | ||
| Plus 150 for Joe Biden, plus 450 for Ron DeSantis, plus 500 for RFK Jr. | ||
| I don't think anybody else is even relevant to say. | ||
| I mean, you could do like plus 10,000 for Vivek Ramaswamy or something, who I like a lot, by the way. | ||
| Yeah, he's good. And Trump was complimentary of him today, by the way, in his speech at New Hampshire. | ||
| So, okay, so we both agree maybe the Dem nominee is the favorite. | ||
| I've explained to the audience why I believe that is. | ||
| Do you agree? I think that they have the weakest field right now. | ||
| They have the weakest person in the race because Joe Biden is bumbling and he's having a hard time speaking and he's talking out of turn. | ||
| Not to mention all the potential criminal activity. | ||
| Right, but that's the ultimate trump card for them. | ||
| They have the ability at any time to yank him out of the race, give him the hook, pull him out because classified documents. | ||
| And so they can make that. Look how fair we are. | ||
| We're so fair-minded, we're gonna crush Trump. | ||
| Oh, we're the noble ones. | ||
| And we're gonna crush Biden, and Biden's gonna have to bow to the race. | ||
| The fact that he's 1,000 years old is part of it, I'm sure. | ||
| So they got that, and then they can put in whoever they want. | ||
| So that's dangerous. My buddy George Hill was a senior. | ||
| He was, sorry, a supervisory intelligence analyst for the Bureau. | ||
| Spent 11 years, retired from the FBI. He worked for the NSA before that. | ||
| He worked almost 30 years between military intelligence and Navy and Marine Corps. | ||
| And he and I talk, and all the time, he said, I'm stacking ammo, and I'm looking to go to New Hampshire, because his concern is, you don't see a lot of concern on the side of the Democrats, even though they have this weak, frail guy that doesn't have a lot of love. | ||
| He doesn't inspire a lot of excitement. | ||
| No, Trump said this today. | ||
| He was in his speech in New Hampshire, by the way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He said, he said, they said that Biden got 81 million. | |
| I don't see any Biden caps. | ||
| The MAGA hat's the number one selling hat in the history of the world. | ||
| I've never seen a Biden cap anywhere. | ||
| Where are the caps? It's correct. It is correct. | ||
| They should just give him a show. They should give him a show. | ||
| This is the best idea yet. | ||
| I give these ideas for free. | ||
| Yeah, that's a fantastic idea. | ||
| Hire me, CNN. We'll put Trump on primetime three hours a day. | ||
| They absolutely love a Trump because they love to hate Trump and they watch their ratings dip precipitously when he disappeared from the scene. | ||
| So they need Trump. He's a breath of fresh air. | ||
| But you don't see a lot of panic from the Democrat side that they have a crappy candidate who is not inspiring a lot of excitement. | ||
| And, you know, it's like how many people are out there running around with Kansas City Royals hats on in any other place except Kansas City? | ||
| And nothing against the Royals. | ||
| My dad actually used to be one of the managers there. | ||
| They're having a bad year. Are they? | ||
| They might be the worst in the league. | ||
| Somebody goes like, you know anything about sports ball? | ||
| And I'm like, no, I don't know sports ball anymore. | ||
| You got lucky then, because I think the Royals are probably the worst team in the league. | ||
| That's really funny. I grew up around all kinds of baseball teams and stuff like that. | ||
| I used to love sports, but I just don't follow anymore because this is the biggest sport. | ||
| The biggest sport is who's going to crush this country and can we fight back? | ||
| And I'll tell you this. It looks like the Democrats are doing something. | ||
| They're playing to win. They always are. | ||
| And Republicans, which I'm not a Republican, but I am generally leaning that direction. | ||
| Republicans are playing to lose more slowly. | ||
| That's a really bad way to work. | ||
| And we talked about it on the break, but it's like it's Bangkok rules. | ||
| One guy is trying to play by the rules and be fair. | ||
| And, you know, the Democrats are doing Kurt Russell. | ||
| They're throwing the can in the air. | ||
| If people haven't seen Escape from LA, go watch that. | ||
| It's really good. It'll actually tell you exactly the way a lot of people on the left think because they talk about how they're going to be rounding up all these people. | ||
| But you throw the can in the air. | ||
| You tell everyone to watch for the can. | ||
| And while you're looking at the can, they machine gun you down. | ||
| Well, that's the biggest mistake. | ||
| I think Trump made it as well. | ||
| I mean, even Durham others, they assume that they're dealing in good faith because they're good faith dealers. | ||
| You're not dealing in good faith with the Democrats. | ||
| You're not. And that is exactly what Durham's fault is. | ||
| I think Durham was trying to be measured. | ||
| I think he was trying to be reasonable. | ||
| He's a man that came from an honest and a very loyal background of trying to serve the nation. | ||
| And we're not seeing fair play. | ||
| If you assume people are honest operators. | ||
| Here's a great example. I talked to this woman, Tiffany Justice. | ||
| She's Moms for Liberty. And they had this huge scandal. | ||
| And the scandal is, you know, they quoted Adolf Hitler, which is why I did my whole podcast about Adolf Hitler yesterday. | ||
| They quoted Adolf Hitler, and they said that she was doing a dog whistle to white supremacists and Nazis. | ||
| Do you know how bad it is? | ||
| You know Frank Figluzzi, right? | ||
| Oh, Mr. 8-8? Yeah, I know Frank. | ||
| He looks like a dead fish, by the way. | ||
| Where do they find these people? | ||
| They find them in the FBI's counterintelligence division. | ||
| That's where he comes from. They're so insane. | ||
| Elon Musk has 88 subscriptions on his page or whatever. | ||
| That's right. And they literally circle. | ||
| It's probably changed. The number is fluctuating all the time. | ||
| And they say, look, 88. | ||
| That's key for Hale-Hiller. | ||
| That's right. This is an FBI agent that believes this stuff. | ||
| I mean, you've probably seen it as much as me. | ||
| I've seen stuff that they actually believe. | ||
| Like about me, let's say. | ||
| And I mean, I know me. I know it's not true. | ||
| And I'm like, these are people that are at extremely high level positions and they believe this stuff about me. | ||
| I'm like... Are these people nuts? | ||
| I've been briefed on stuff. | ||
| I started actually in 2017. | ||
| I was in the Washington field office, my first year of full-time duty. | ||
| And I'm out there. I know. | ||
| He looks like he's never met a Botox injection he doesn't like. | ||
| I just love that he's got that. | ||
| Either that or he's never had a lost a night sleep in his entire life. | ||
| He's so serious. He's so serious. | ||
| He is just... Look at those pit black eyes. | ||
| He is serious. He's one of my favorites. | ||
| So you've got these people. | ||
| They were briefing us on Milo Yiannopoulos. | ||
| They're briefing us on Richard Spencer. | ||
| This is 2017. They're talking about Pepe the Frog, the Kekestani movement. | ||
| And then also, because you know this is related, Jordan Peterson. | ||
| All these things are all part of this domestic terror briefing that I'm getting. | ||
| And I'm sitting there listening to them. | ||
| And I'm a pretty right-wing guy, I guess. | ||
| I didn't know I was. I thought I was a centrist, but I'm not. | ||
| Well, centrist right now. | ||
| Anything left of Hitler... | ||
| Excuse me, anything right of Hitler... | ||
| Is considered... | ||
| Spot on. Yeah. So I'm sitting here listening to this brief, and look, I've looked into what the Kekistani thing was, because I was like, what are these flags about? | ||
| Like, what are these people saying? What's up with the Pepe the Frog thing? | ||
| I see it. It's pop culture. | ||
| I want to know about it. Because I care about America, because my credentials say my job is interests of the United States and federal law. | ||
| So this guy gives this brief, and I'm like, nothing in this thing is correct. | ||
| Nothing he said was accurate. | ||
| Stunning. So then I go and I pull him aside. | ||
| I'm like, hey, if you ever want to know what the heck you're talking about, like, I'd be more than happy to talk to you about the Keck movement, about any of the things that you just talked about, and everything was wrong. | ||
| And by the way, putting Jordan Peterson in a brief talking about Richard Spencer, that makes you a crazy person. | ||
| That makes you 8-8... | ||
| Frank Figlusi, whatever his name is, Frankie Figs, the guy whose face looks like a salmon, that's what you are if you are out there doing that. | ||
| And like you say, it's gone full bore. | ||
| White supremacist around everybody. So what happens when you try to write that track? | ||
| No, nothing. Thanks so much for your information. | ||
| And that's it. No follow-up. | ||
| I'll tell you, and it's amazing too, because like you were saying, I didn't get into media to be the story, right? | ||
| It's like you didn't become a whistleblower to be the story. | ||
| Right. But eventually, some stuff happens, and you eventually become the story. | ||
| It just recently happened to me. And I'm sitting there, and I'm looking at what people are saying, and I'm looking at the commentary, and I'm just like, you're so out of your mind. | ||
| But how do I explain you? | ||
| It's like the same thing working here at Infowars for Alex Jones. | ||
| I see all types of stuff that people say about Alex Jones, Infowars. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm just like, look, I'm not mad. | |
| I don't hate you. I'm trying to tell you. | ||
| You're so disillusioned. | ||
| It's insane. Yeah, it's totally disconnected from reality. | ||
| And I might as well tell this because I was thinking about it before, but I didn't mention it. | ||
| My wife and I used to watch your videos out there. | ||
| I love the boldness that used to go out. | ||
| I mean, this is going back. Whenever you first got your first... | ||
| Man on the street video. How far back is that going? | ||
| 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018. | ||
| Now I just can't go out. Yeah, so almost 10 years ago. | ||
| My wife and I were watching some of your videos. | ||
| We got to see some of this stuff. And you'd go out there and challenge people. | ||
| And I always thought it was amazing. I was like... | ||
| It's about damn time somebody did. | ||
| The amount of balls it takes to go out there to a hostile crowd and rile them up. | ||
| You know, I've been in hostile crowds. | ||
| The goal is to not do that sort of stuff. | ||
| I love it. Yeah, but it's really fun. | ||
| And then the other thing is you obviously have a combative nature. | ||
| I have the same sort of instinct. If people are going to say things that are ridiculous, you want to challenge them. | ||
| And so we used to watch that kind of stuff. | ||
| It's bizarre that you're like, I'm part of the story now. | ||
| You were part of the story then. | ||
| You didn't choose it. You're just out there asking questions. | ||
| It gets people pissed. And suddenly you're like, you're the enemy. | ||
| And then you're going to have an FBI briefing about you. | ||
| And I guarantee there have been some. | ||
| So, I didn't get any of them. More than some. | ||
| Oh, I wish you would have. That would have been fun. | ||
| If I could have shared it, I would have, 100%. | ||
| Oh, I'm sure it would have been fun. All right, Kyle, this has been fantastic. | ||
| I hope you come back in studio. | ||
| I know Alex said when he comes back, he'd like to get you back in. | ||
| You're not far from here, so that's awesome. | ||
| One more time, where can people follow your podcast? | ||
| So they can go to kylserafin.com if they want to find the audio. | ||
| Like I say, we're on all the different downloadable places, but we stream live on rumble.com slash kylserafin, S-E-R-A-P-H-I-N. You can always find me on my handles, which is like at kylserafin. | ||
| That's on Truth and Twitter. Well, let me tell you, I don't get starstruck. | ||
| I actually came from sports media, rub doubles with some of the biggest sports stars. | ||
| You, my friend, are an American hero. | ||
| I mean that. I appreciate it. | ||
| Take that microphone down. | ||
| It's a spy device now. See, that's how it goes. | ||
| All right, guys, we'll be right back. I'm going to get into the news. | ||
| Well, that was a fantastic interview, almost two hours long. | ||
| I could have gone all day, honestly. | ||
| But I do have some other news I want to cover here and get to some other video clips that we need to focus on. | ||
| And then we're going to go into the mind of the liberals on this issue with the vaccine mandates. | ||
| Jeffrey Toobin, the guy who masturbates on webcams. | ||
| Yeah. And then gets hired by CNN. Jeffrey Toobin. | ||
| He went on the Patrick Bet David podcast. | ||
| I guess this is right after Alex went on. | ||
| And it's just... | ||
| It's not that I really care what Jeffrey Toobin, a serial masturbator, has to say. | ||
| I actually feel bad. He's probably got a porn addiction. | ||
| It's that understanding the leftist psychology is so important because you understand where their policy comes from, why it fails, and also why they refuse to debate, like Dr. | ||
| Peter Hotez, who we also have news on today. | ||
| But... I just did an hour and a half long interview and I didn't even plug. | ||
| And that's okay. The information here is so important. | ||
| We put the information as a higher priority than even funding ourselves at times. | ||
| And, you know, that's why sometimes it's hard to fund yourself when you put the information first. | ||
| That's okay. We're still on the air. | ||
| That's all that matters. Let me just tell you this. | ||
| It's not just about funding us. | ||
| We have great products that I myself am a product of. | ||
| I love the supplements at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra, both 50% off. | ||
| I don't go on air without one of those nootropics. | ||
| I've got the Brain Force Plus capsules right here on my desk all the time. | ||
| Also got the Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| I think this is actually Rob's leftover Brain Force Ultra from last week. | ||
| It's mine now, though. I'll be commenteering that here. | ||
| So, I can tell you from first-hand experience, incredible nootropic. | ||
| Really, I've never had anything else like it. | ||
| I don't know. Nootropics have never really been anything for me. | ||
| I remember, I was never diagnosed with ADHD or anything, but I remember getting to college and a lot of people had the ADHD stuff. | ||
| The different drugs. | ||
| And I remember I would try it. | ||
| I tried it a couple times to see if it helped me study and it did not. | ||
| It didn't help me focus at all. | ||
| If anything, it had the exact opposite effect. | ||
| Like the last thing I wanted to do was, you know, hit a book and study or something. | ||
| So not with Brain Force Ultra, not with Brain Force Plus. | ||
| I mean, it's like... Total focus, no distraction, not even a challenge. | ||
| Just amazing stuff, nothing like it. | ||
| And I love when I hear from members of the audience that have children that maybe get diagnosed with ADHD or something and they get prescribed one of these prescription drugs, one of these pharmaceutical drugs. | ||
| And I'm not a doctor, so let's just be clear. | ||
| I'm not a doctor. I'm not giving you any doctor advice. | ||
| But when people tell me, hey, I got off the big pharmaceutical pills for my child to deal with ADHD or whatever, I tried Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| And it was an even better effect for my kid. | ||
| Thank you so much. So that's always great to hear. | ||
| So from first-hand experience, folks, Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra, 50% off, great nootropic, nothing like it. | ||
| You got a big business presentation. | ||
| You got a big exam coming up. | ||
| Whatever the case is, that's the way to go. | ||
| For me, three-hour talk show, Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| And you mix that with Turbo Force Plus, you're just taking off like a rocket. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus, also 25% off right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 10 hours, yes I said it, 10 hours of clean energy, Turbo Force Plus at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Trust me, ladies and gentlemen, it's all part of the 4th of July Super Sale, and with your purchase, you're getting double Patriot points that can be applied towards future purchases. | ||
| So take advantage of these huge July 4th sales. | ||
| July 4th comes early at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| All right. Okay, Donald Trump. | ||
| Let's actually do this. | ||
| Let's play this longer video. | ||
| Donald Trump was in New Hampshire today. | ||
| Honestly, it was a great campaign event. | ||
| I think he spoke for like two hours. | ||
| It was awesome. | ||
| It was classic Donald Trump today, and he seems really, the demeanor is really positive from Trump as well. | ||
| Seems really calm and collected, despite everything that's going on. | ||
| And so we had a fantastic rally. | ||
| It went on for about two hours. | ||
| Just classic Donald Trump, going off script, coming back on script, going off script, having a laugh, making a joke, everybody having a good time. | ||
| And then afterwards, he stepped off the podium, and unlike Joe Biden, who runs from the press like a coward, and then the White House Karen's, okay, move along, everybody get out, everybody run, everybody move, everybody get out, get out of the White House, leave, leave, leave. | ||
| Biden's not taking questions, no press conferences. | ||
| Donald Trump does a two-hour campaign speech, steps off the podium, and then takes questions from the press on the leaked tape, confronts it head-on. | ||
| Here it is earlier today. | ||
| Donald Trump reacts to the leaked DOJ tapes moments after finishing his two-hour campaign rally speech. | ||
| And I said it very clearly. | ||
| I had a whole desk full of lots of papers and mostly newspaper articles, copies of magazines, copies of different plans, copies of stories, having to do with many, many subjects. | ||
| And what was said was absolutely fine and very perfectly. | ||
| We did nothing wrong. This is a whole hoax. | ||
| This is just like the Russia, Russia, Russia deal. | ||
| This is like the fake dossier. | ||
| The dossier was a fake. | ||
| It's all been a big fake. Ukraine, Ukraine, Ukraine. | ||
| We went through these things ad nauseum. | ||
| And this is seven years of this stuff. | ||
| And now this one. | ||
| And the one who's done it wrong is Biden. | ||
| He has 850 boxes all over the place. | ||
| Nobody even knows where they are. | ||
| He's got many boxes in Chinatown, D.C. What are they doing there? | ||
| And he's accepting money from China. | ||
| He's got boxes all over the place. | ||
| I'm covered by the Presidential Records Act. | ||
| I'm covered also by the Clinton Sox case. | ||
| It's a very important case. | ||
| It's law. And we did absolutely nothing wrong. | ||
| This is just another hoax. | ||
| It's called, I would say, election interference more than anything else. | ||
| It's a disgrace that they can do it. | ||
| Next question. But everything was fine. | ||
| We did nothing wrong. | ||
| And everybody knows it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're not concerned, then, with your own voice on those recordings? | |
| My voice was fine. | ||
| What did I say wrong on those recordings? | ||
| I didn't even see the recording. | ||
| All I know is I did nothing wrong. | ||
| We had a lot of papers, a lot of papers stacked up. | ||
| In fact, you could hear the rustle of the paper, and nobody said I did anything wrong, other than the fake news, which, of course, is Fox, too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are there any other recordings that we should be concerned of? | |
| I don't know of any recordings that you should be concerned with because I don't do things wrong. | ||
| I do things right. I'm a legitimate person. | ||
| I'm not like Biden that gets hundreds of millions of dollars from people and countries and says, we won't give a billion dollars, but you got to get rid of the prosecutor. | ||
| And then guys like you don't do anything about it because nothing happens. | ||
| Now, we do things right. | ||
| So I don't care about any recordings. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Supreme Court earlier today, in a 6-3 vote, they rejected the independent state legislative theory, which allows that state lawmakers have the authority to set election rules with little oversight from the courts. | |
| Again, a 6-3 ruling. | ||
| What is your take on that? | ||
| Well, that was a North Carolina case primarily, so we'll see what happens. | ||
| It's election law. | ||
| It's what they wanted. | ||
| It's what they felt. A lot of people disagree with them. | ||
| The ruling came out just a little while ago. | ||
| I haven't read the ruling yet. | ||
| It was, again, a North Carolina case. | ||
| We'll see how it works. In the meantime, I can say I did very well in North Carolina. | ||
| I did very well in just about every place, frankly. | ||
| And we'll see what happens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Last week, going back to that interview with Brett Barry, you mentioned that for every one of your hires that was not good, 10 were fantastic. | |
| Those were, I believe, your words last week. | ||
| If you went back to presidency, is there anything, anybody in particular that you would like to see from the first administration and a second in Trump administration? | ||
| We've had a lot of people, Stephen Miller and General Kellogg, and I could name so many people. | ||
| Rick Grinnell was fantastic. | ||
| We had mostly fantastic people. | ||
| I would say for every, and everybody has bad ones. | ||
| You have some that are good, but they turn out to be not so good. | ||
| They're not courageous enough like a Bill Barr. | ||
| He had no courage. But you have, for everyone like that, I've had, I would say, at least 10 that were great. | ||
| And we rebuilt the military. | ||
| We got the largest tax cuts in the history of our country. | ||
| We got the largest regulation cuts in history. | ||
| We had the strongest border. | ||
| That anybody's ever had. | ||
| We've never seen a border like that, and now it's a disaster with people coming in from jails and mental institutions pouring into our country. | ||
| We had the strongest southern border ever. | ||
| When you think about rebuilding the military and Space Force, we added Space Force first time in 78 years. | ||
| Since the Air Force, actually, it's become very important. | ||
| Now, we had a great administration. | ||
| We didn't have a disaster like Afghanistan, where they leave $85 billion behind 13 dead soldiers. | ||
| That should have never happened. American citizens left behind. | ||
| I think it was the most embarrassing moment in history. | ||
| If the election weren't rigged, and you won't put it on because you're Fox, but if the election weren't rigged, you wouldn't have had the Russia disaster, the horrible, horrible situation with Ukraine. | ||
| That would have never happened. Putin wouldn't have done it. | ||
| And China would never be talking about Taiwan right now either, which could be the next one. | ||
| So there you have it. | ||
| We've got a little more from Trump today. | ||
| But when we come back, I'm going to focus on the other side of the aisle, the new Biden whistleblowers. | ||
| Two. What did I say last night? | ||
| Final segment when I signed off. | ||
| I said, your political MD here has his fingers on the pulse. | ||
| Major cardiac events incoming. | ||
| And we've had two since then. | ||
| We'll show you both on the other side. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. Here we are. | |
| Now remember, 25 hours ago, what did I say? | ||
| Major political cardiac events coming. | ||
| That's how I signed off the show yesterday. | ||
| I said I got my finger on the pulse. | ||
| Major cardiac events coming. | ||
| Two Biden whistleblowers have come forward since then. | ||
| We played you the clip from the new one, Mr. | ||
| X, from today. Here was one on with Jesse Waters, who's going to be replacing Tucker Carlson for Fox News' primetime slot. | ||
| He had a Biden donor on last night blowing the whistle on the Biden illegal campaign donations, but I don't think this is just for the Bidens. | ||
| I think he's exposing how it goes down for many politicians. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here it is. Well, it was Bo and Hunter first, and then when I said, yeah, I might have that left in my budget. | |
| And political contributions were a regular mainstay thing for our industry. | ||
| And then it went to Dennis Toner, who I said, Dennis, I think this is a campaign thing, so the contribution limit is $2,600. | ||
| How do I get around that? | ||
| He said, how many managers do you have you can trust? | ||
| I said, all of them. | ||
| And he said, well, have them write a check and reimburse them. | ||
| I knew that's how you got around the limit. | ||
| I didn't know it was illegal. So the FBI came to you. | ||
| They say, we got you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And you offered what to the FBI? They met me at a gas station on a Wednesday morning at 8.30 in the morning, and they followed me from my house. | |
| And being a law-abiding citizen, I mean, I have the last interaction with law enforcement I've had outside of this. | ||
| Now, this is obviously a big thing, but outside of that was a traffic ticket, a speeding ticket in 1997. | ||
| So I'm a law-abiding citizen. | ||
| When the FBI comes up to me, I talk to them. | ||
| So I sat down with them for four hours and told them everything. | ||
| And they said, you know, these donations that you made in the name of other people. | ||
| I said, well, but the Bidens. | ||
| I mean, that was as a request from Dennis Toner, the campaign manager. | ||
| And they wouldn't have it. | ||
| So yes, they asked me to wear a wire. | ||
| They did put me in situations where I was involved with other people. | ||
| And once it got to Dennis and to Joe, the entire investigation was called off and the indictment was unsealed. | ||
| And so I did maybe five or six different appearances, and the targets that they wanted to focus on were—it just didn't work out. | ||
| But I told them everything I know because I cooperate with law enforcement. | ||
| I believe in law enforcement. And now, seeing what has happened with Hunter and having an inside look into the evidence, Thanks to MarcoPoloUSA.com and Miranda Devine. | ||
| Having an inside look at the evidence, I know that I got a raw deal, unfortunately. | ||
| And so did Harvey Walker, Joseph Timlin, Brenda Mathis, Kevin Fleming, Sarah Collins, Bob Adams, other people who have been charged in the district with tax crimes. | ||
| All were charged with felonies. | ||
| All had no say. | ||
| And Hunter's information and his plea bargain, his plea bargain was announced the day that his information was released. | ||
| That's never happened. | ||
| Hunter is the only person ever in the district to be charged as a misdemeanor. | ||
| No one else in 30 years has ever been charged with that as a standalone charge as a misdemeanor. | ||
| He's the first. I sent you a verification of that through PACER. That's not right. | ||
| And I think U.S. Attorney David Weiss has some explaining to do, with respect to the public, of how Hunter, who was a lawyer, by the way, who's a lawyer, Who also had his passport revoked by the State Department because of his tax liens in 2015 and 2016. | ||
| And he's a lawyer, and then he is not charged with tax evasion. | ||
| He's not charged with felonies. | ||
| He gets misdemeanors for not filing. | ||
| He had tax issues going back to 2009, 2010. | ||
| He had tax liens put on his homes, on his wife's homes. | ||
| And it's not that I want anything bad to happen to Hunter. | ||
| My issue is with the U.S. Attorney and not playing fair with Citizens. | ||
| Wow. Well, there you heard it last night. | ||
| Jesse Waters' prime time. | ||
| By the way, I mean, what Fox News did to Tucker Carlson is obviously despicable, disgusting, and perhaps a keyhole view into... | ||
| How Fox News really operates. | ||
| But I gotta say, if anybody is gonna get Tucker Carlson's time slot, I think Jesse Waters deserves it, and I say good for him. | ||
| And I like Jesse. So, who knows? | ||
| Maybe Jesse will be the one that gets fired next. | ||
| Maybe Jesse will be the one that has to go independent next. | ||
| Kinda seems like that would be the trend here. | ||
| But I digress. That was the Biden whistleblower. | ||
| On Jesse Waters last night. | ||
| So amazing, isn't it? Oh, the Bidens know how to deceive individuals into making illegal campaign contributions, and then they get caught, they get charged, and when the investigation leads to the Bidens, they wipe their hands, clean of it, and shut it down. | ||
| Now, do you really think that the Bidens are the only people engaged in that campaign contribution fraud and crime? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't. Not one bit. | |
| How is that not a bigger story? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because it's the Bidens. | |
| If it was anybody else, folks, even Hillary Clinton, that would be a huge story right now. | ||
| We're talking about cold-cut political corruption, illegal campaign contributions. | ||
| Maybe low-level criminal activity when it comes to politics, all things considered, but yet everybody can relate to it. | ||
| Everybody should say, hey, that's a crime. | ||
| If I did it, I'd get caught. | ||
| Why didn't the Bidens go down? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Bingo! Bingo! | |
| So it's not just the Bidens doing it, let's be honest, but the Bidens didn't get charged because they're the Bidens. | ||
| They're above the law. Couldn't be more clear. | ||
| Look, I think we've gotten through this round of cardiac events. | ||
| I think the heart rate has kind of settled back down. | ||
| Again, last night, what I tell you, major cardiac events coming. | ||
| That whistleblower went public last night. | ||
| And then we had the second whistleblower go public today. | ||
| So I see kind of the rest of the week just... | ||
| I don't know if there's going to be any major developments on this. | ||
| However... I wouldn't be surprised if more whistleblowers come out the rest of the year as we get closer. | ||
| The primaries start in what? | ||
| When is the first primary, guys? | ||
| I think January or something. See when the first Democrat primary is. | ||
| I don't think the whistleblower phenomenon into the Biden crime family is going anywhere. | ||
| I don't think that deal is going anywhere. | ||
| I don't think the whistleblowers going to the House Oversight Committee, I don't think | ||
| that's going anywhere. | ||
| And thanks to people like the guest we had on, Kyle Serafin and others, this isn't just | ||
| a one-off. | ||
| This isn't just a trend and then it goes away. | ||
| These are Americans that really care about the future of this country and where it's | ||
| going and they want people to know this information. | ||
| you Who knows if they're even Trump supporters? | ||
| They might not be. The point is, they see how rigged the justice system is, and they've firsthand been a part of that against them, and yet there are the Bidens still somehow, someway above the law. | ||
| Now, this is another big one. | ||
| And this could potentially be massive. | ||
| Yeah, January 22nd is the first caucus. | ||
| That's in Iowa and then New Hampshire right after that. | ||
| So it is January. | ||
| So we got about six months here. | ||
| I think the bait and switch probably happens before then, but who knows? | ||
| Maybe they put Biden up there as kind of a punching bag to put some wind in the sails of whoever they want But this is going to be crazy, considering RFK Jr. | ||
| is surging in the polls. He's getting about 20% in every poll. | ||
| They can't keep him off the debate stage, but they don't even want to have debates. | ||
| But we're getting a bit ahead of ourselves. | ||
| Let's get back to what could be the next potentially big drop here. | ||
| There's a burner phone that Hunter Biden's firm, which is really run by Joe Biden. | ||
| Hunter Biden is like the mule. | ||
| He's like the rat hole. | ||
| And this firm had a burner phone for Joe Biden. | ||
| Well, this information is now known to the House Judiciary Committee and the House Oversight Committee. | ||
| And so Jim Jordan, with this information, said this last night on Jesse Waters' primetime. | ||
| Are we going to get any of these burner phone records, any of these credit card records from these shell companies? | ||
| Because that could lead us somewhere. | ||
| Yeah, I think that'll probably, Jesse, primarily out of Chairman Comer's committee, the Oversight Committee. | ||
| He's been focused on the business records associated with the Biden business enterprise. | ||
| We want to talk to David Weiss. | ||
| Chris is right, your previous guest. | ||
| We want to talk to David Weiss, the U.S. Attorney. | ||
| We want to talk to Leslie Wolf. | ||
| She's the one who stopped the search warrant. | ||
| She's the one who said you can't ask questions during the investigation. | ||
| So Mr. Shapley said you can't ask questions about Joe Biden. | ||
| You can't even bring up the term the big guy. | ||
| I mean, stop and think about this for a second. | ||
| So Joe Biden said he wasn't involved in his son's business dealings. | ||
| That sure looks like it wasn't accurate. | ||
| And Merrick Garland said he took a hands-off approach to the investigation. | ||
| That sure looks like it wasn't accurate as well. | ||
| So those are the questions we have to ask. | ||
| The first one will be done, I think, in Chairman Comer's committee. | ||
| He is focused on that. | ||
| The entire six months we've been in Congress, we will continue to focus on the Justice Department. | ||
| So we want to talk to David Weiss. | ||
| We want to talk to Mr. Estrada. | ||
| We want to talk to Leslie Wolf. | ||
| We want to talk to all these U.S. attorneys and say, why did you do it this way? | ||
| I mean, this is a credible whistleblower, 14 years experience, handled some of the biggest international tax cases in that time frame, handled some of the biggest ones that the IRS has dealt with. | ||
| We think he's credible. | ||
| He's raised important issues. | ||
| We want to get the answers. And the way you do that is to talk to these attorneys who handled this case. | ||
| All right. Well, we'll be looking forward to that. | ||
| And in the regular police department, if someone tips off a target to a search warrant, that person's out of the force. | ||
| I mean, you can't get away with that. | ||
| Yeah. All right, Congressman. | ||
| That's what Leslie Wolf of the FBI did. | ||
| You're exactly right. So let me tell you what I think is going on here. | ||
| And I would say all the names that were mentioned by Jim Jordan there are all going to be subpoenaed. | ||
| I expect every single one of those individuals to have to testify, definitely before the primaries, so definitely this year. | ||
| I have no idea when this will happen. | ||
| I expect all of them will have to testify in front of Congress. | ||
| As far as the Biden burner phone is concerned, and is there going to be anything there? | ||
| Folks, the odds are that phone is long gone. | ||
| Smashed to smithereens with a hammer in the Hillary Clinton treatment or just like anybody. | ||
| I mean, do you have all your old phones? | ||
| So my guess is that's not really going to lead anywhere. | ||
| It's just more of suspicious activity from this Biden cabal. | ||
| But it's the testimony from the aforementioned agents there that is going to be so bombshell because somehow, someway, eventually they're going to have to explain why they're protecting this FBI informant and why he can't be brought in for questioning, even if it is in a closed setting, so that these members of the House Judiciary Committee Can get a better grasp on what's really going on behind the scenes. | ||
| But the FBI has said, we can't let our informant be known his life is in danger. | ||
| So what are we supposed to interpret from that? | ||
| So this story is not going anywhere. | ||
| The question is, where's Joe Biden going? | ||
| Because at this rate... | ||
| I don't know. I mean, we saw them cover up all the Clinton crimes when she ran for president. | ||
| But the American people were not nearly as tuned in and alert as they are now. | ||
| So, I just do not see how Biden can run for office in 2024. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I really don't at this point. | |
| So, I don't know what the Democrats' plan is. | ||
| Even if they want to steal it, You know, as clear as day and say Biden won again, I just don't see how that gives them any advantage. | ||
| This guy is the lowest rated president. | ||
| Nobody likes him. He can't talk. | ||
| He can't walk. He's clearly corrupted. | ||
| And there's going to be more that comes out on this crime family. | ||
| But maybe that's it. Maybe this is the just total demoralization where they just show you, here's the most corrupt man in U.S. political history, Joe Biden, and he's your president, and there's nothing you can do about it, you dirty, stinking American. | ||
| Happy Pride Month. Joe Biden makes this statement last night. | ||
| House Republicans are proposing a GOP tax scam 2.0 that would spend hundreds | ||
| of billions of dollars on tax breaks for big corporations while shipping clean | ||
| energy jobs overseas and raising energy costs on American families. Their | ||
| priorities are clear. Wow. Let's just go ahead and break this down for the | ||
| absolute propaganda that it is. | ||
| House Republicans are proposing a GOP tax scam 2.0. | ||
| That's a tax cut. | ||
| It's a tax cut. So cutting taxes is a tax scam, according to Joe Biden. | ||
| And then it says it would spend hundreds of billions of dollars on tax breaks for big corporations. | ||
| How does that spend money? How does writing a tax break or cutting taxes, how does that spend any money? | ||
| Well, it doesn't. That's Looney Tunes land. | ||
| That's moron speak. | ||
| Shipping clean energy jobs overseas and raising energy costs on American families. | ||
| Joe Biden raised energy costs on American families. | ||
| They doubled when he cut off our energy. | ||
| And all the quote-unquote clean energy jobs are already overseas. | ||
| So that's already going on, and he did it. | ||
| And this is just crazy. | ||
| Now... But as insane as all the lies... | ||
| And disinformation from Joe Biden are here. | ||
| I can't believe that we still have this debate. | ||
| I can't believe Democrat voters are pro-taxation. | ||
| Because they're just thieves at this point. | ||
| They are just thieves. | ||
| The low-level Democrat voter is just a lazy bum that wants to steal your money, but use the government to do it. | ||
| And then the leader of the Democrat Party, Joe Biden, is just a literal thief who wants to steal your money. | ||
| And you want these people to raise your taxes? | ||
| What the hell is wrong with you? | ||
| Seriously. I mean, folks, look, I'm not trying to get off track. | ||
| I can't help myself. This is just stream of consciousness. | ||
| Liberals want to chop their little boys and girls up, turn them into eunuchs. | ||
| Liberals want to increase your taxes so that you're broke and can't afford anything. | ||
| Liberals want an open border and a welfare state so the whole economy collapses. | ||
| Liberals want to shut off our energy so you can't afford to heat and cool your home and drive your car to work. | ||
| I mean, it's just like, what the hell is wrong with you people? | ||
| See, we should be celebrating tax breaks on big corporations. | ||
| Yeah, I said it. Because I'm not an idiot. | ||
| And I understand how economics works. | ||
| We should be slashing taxes on big corporations. | ||
| You may not like big corporations. | ||
| I might not like big corporations. | ||
| But you know who pays a lot of people good wages and good salaries? | ||
| Big corporations. | ||
| Yeah. Where do a lot of you libtards work? | ||
| Big corporations. | ||
| Do you realize that when you raise taxes on big corporations, you're paying the price? | ||
| All these big corporations are doing are rewriting their own books, redoing their own accounting, and passing the cost down to you! | ||
| They're leveling out their books! | ||
| If they have to pay $100 million more in taxes, then they're going to rewrite their books, and you, the employee, are going to take the hit! | ||
| Why is this so hard for leftists to understand? | ||
| Why are you so stupid? | ||
| And it wouldn't bother me if you didn't vote. | ||
| And this is why I'm to the point now where I'm serious. | ||
| We need to have IQ tests for votes. | ||
| You should have to pass a test before you get to vote. | ||
| Just basic questions. It doesn't have to be hard. | ||
| Just prove you're not a complete idiot before you vote. | ||
| I'm sick of morons voting this country into tyranny and collapse. | ||
| I'm done. I want a common sense solution that works, that's really not out of the norm. | ||
| No, we should have IQ tests for votes. | ||
| If you work for a big corporation and you would vote to raise taxes on big corporations, you're a freaking idiot. | ||
| And I'm doing you a favor by taking your vote away, by the way. | ||
| I just, what? | ||
| What? Because where do you think your money goes that the government takes in taxes? | ||
| You think you're getting that money? | ||
| You're dumber than I thought. It's going to war. | ||
| It's going to Ukraine. | ||
| It's going to illegal immigrants. | ||
| It's going to God knows what. | ||
| It's going to Uzbekistan. | ||
| It's going to walls in Afghanistan. | ||
| It's going to protect poppy fields in Afghanistan. | ||
| That's all shut down now, but you get the point. | ||
| It's just unbelievable. | ||
| It's just unbelievable. And by the way, let me continue this conversation on the other side of this next segment because there's this trend happening and I'd like to respond to it dealing with the state of the economy. | ||
| And by the way, I've got more clips from the Biden administration today. | ||
| It's the greatest economy ever. | ||
| Everybody's happy in the Biden economy. | ||
| Nobody's ever been as thrilled as they are economically as they are now. | ||
| I mean, it's just lie, lie, lie, lie, lie, lie. | ||
| Everybody knows it. I mean, you can go look at any poll. | ||
| There was a new poll that came out today. | ||
| 18% say the economy is in good condition under Joe Biden. | ||
| 18%. But then Karine Jean-Pierre... | ||
| And they got this new press woman today. | ||
| We'll play these clips from this Dalton lady today. | ||
| We'll play them later. She's telling you it's all great too. | ||
| 18% say the economy is good under Joe Biden. | ||
| Yep. 18%. | ||
| But they say it's the greatest economy ever. | ||
| They lie to you and they don't even blink. | ||
| They lie to you and it doesn't bother them one bit. | ||
| And then they tell you the economy is great when it's in shambles, and then they say, we're going to raise your taxes, this is going to help you financially, and then it crushes you. | ||
| So we'll get to the lowest common denominator on the other side of this upcoming break, dealing with this, with a phenomenon that I'm seeing, and we'll apply this to reality here. | ||
| How's the economy really doing under Joe Biden? | ||
| Well, anybody who lives in reality knows, not so hot. | ||
| Not so hot. | ||
| But here's what is hot. | ||
| The sales at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| These things are on fire, and it's July 4th sale comes early. | ||
| Everybody knows that we do some of our biggest sales for July 4th. | ||
| Obviously, big patriots here at InfoWars, so we like the July 4th sale. | ||
| Maybe even rivaling our Christmas sales. | ||
| This is a big one, folks. Up to 60% off some of the top-rated, top-selling products at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And double patriot points with every order. | ||
| Check your Patriot Points account, folks. | ||
| You might have a large build-up there you can use towards future purchases. | ||
| Folks, we're talking about products that you need like toothpaste, Everybody brushes their teeth, except maybe Hunter Biden. | ||
| So everybody needs toothpaste. | ||
| Why not get your toothpaste from Infowarsstore.com? | ||
| Now, Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals makes a toothpaste exclusively for Infowarsstore.com, and all Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals products are 25% off. | ||
| So the great turmeric toothpaste, the great super coral whitening toothpaste, both fluoride-free, both on sale right now, 25% off. | ||
| And let me just tell you, I was somebody that always went and bought, like, the top-shelf toothpaste. | ||
| Like, I always wanted the best stuff fluoride-free. | ||
| And it's usually about $20 per tube. | ||
| This is better than that. | ||
| This toothpaste is better than the top-rated, top-selling toothpaste that you'll go find top-shelf at your most elite grocery store. | ||
| And it's half the price right now. | ||
| Find out why I love the toothpaste from InfoWars store for yourself. | ||
| It's 25% off. | ||
| You won't regret it. | ||
| Yeah, all the people that want to expand government, increase the size of government, which costs us more money, then complain about why they have so little money. | ||
| Well, you keep raising taxes and expanding the government, taking your money, and then you're confused at what's going on. | ||
| You're probably a libtard. | ||
| Now, this all ties in to what I'm talking about. | ||
| Let's go to I guess this lady is a temporary spokeswoman for the White House today. | ||
| And let's roll clips six and seven back-to-back here. | ||
| They are celebrating the Biden economy at the White House again today. | ||
| I guess Corrine Jean-Pierre lying to you about how great the economy wasn't really working, so they brought in this other babe, Dalton, here. | ||
| And so she's going to tell you how great the economy is as more Americans are struggling to get by and are living paycheck to paycheck than ever before. | ||
| And so here she is to tell you, nope, that's not what's going on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How is Bidenomics not an era of high inflation and rising unemployment rate? | |
| Well, take a look at where we started and where we are now. | ||
| I think that's the answer to your question. | ||
| Why do you think that is? | ||
| And is this big rebrand going to be enough to bridge that divide and turn things around? | ||
| Well, what I would say is that the president's economic policies are incredibly popular. | ||
| When you ask people what they think about investing in our roads, bridges, and airports. | ||
| Airports are a disaster. | ||
| Roads, bridges falling apart. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Educating and empowering workers. | |
| When you ask people about how they feel about reshoring manufacturing jobs and investing in America. | ||
| Manufacturing, shutdown, climate change. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we find that when we go out and we talk to people about it, they support Bidenomics. | |
| And so that's exactly what the president is going to be doing in Chicago tomorrow. | ||
| That's exactly why we're talking to Americans about everything that he's doing, to make sure that we grow the economy by growing the middle class, give people the support that they need to grow our economy for us. | ||
| What? What is she talking about? | ||
| I mean, I don't know if Olivia Dalton is dumber than Karine Jean-Pierre, but she's neck and neck. | ||
| No pun intended, by the way. | ||
| So, but what's really going on? | ||
| And if you are my age, you can definitely relate to this. | ||
| And it's not always been like this in the United States. | ||
| Homes used to be affordable. | ||
| Property taxes either didn't exist or wouldn't crush you. | ||
| Now, that's not quite the case. | ||
| And so here's what we have. | ||
| The Biden administration tells you U.S. homeowners are in great financial shape. | ||
| This isn't 2008. | ||
| Well, U.S. homeowners searching Google this month, here are some of the top trends. | ||
| Can I sell my house if it's in foreclosure? | ||
| It's trending so high it's not even registering a percentile. | ||
| It went from zero to out of this world. | ||
| Sell my house fast, Phoenix. | ||
| Sell my house fast, Arlington. | ||
| Sell my house fast, Milwaukee. | ||
| Home equity loan, no credit check. | ||
| Best home equity loans in Texas. | ||
| Can I get a home equity loan with bad credit? | ||
| So these are all signs that the homeowners are not in great financial shape, unlike what the Biden administration is telling you. | ||
| And then there's this trend, and this video has gone viral on the internet, of millennials who are explaining to the older generations that maybe don't understand this because they grew up in a different era. | ||
| But let me just say, I mean... | ||
| Most millennials grow up and once you get out of high school and either you go to college or not and then you get in your 20s, the understanding by most millennials is you're never going to make it. | ||
| There's no money out there. | ||
| There's no jobs out there. | ||
| Home prices are completely out of your financial reach. | ||
| Most people coming out of college with hundreds of thousands in debt and so it's just like the American dream is dead for you. | ||
| Maybe when you're 30 or 40, if you're lucky, you can get a good job. | ||
| But that's the mindset. | ||
| That's how millennials are thinking. | ||
| And they're feeling it even worse now. | ||
| I mean, Trump gave you a brush of fresh air. | ||
| Trump put wind in our sails economically. | ||
| Well, it's all gone now with Biden. | ||
| The wind's going against us. | ||
| And so this trend with these types of videos are going viral right now. | ||
| On TikTok and everywhere else, and it's millennials like, yeah, I feel like I never have a chance financially because of the economy that Joe Biden and Kareem Jean-Pierre and Olivia Dalton says is the greatest of all time. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're starving. We can't afford milk. | |
| We can't afford eggs. | ||
| We can't afford our rent. | ||
| We can't afford our prescriptions. | ||
| We can't afford insulin. | ||
| We can't afford healthcare. We can't afford our education. | ||
| It's just so frustrating that we did everything they told us to do. | ||
| We went to school. We got educated. | ||
| We worked hard. We did everything they told us to do. | ||
| And then when we're actually out in the world, they want to charge us $1,800 for a one-bedroom apartment. | ||
| That really ain't shit. | ||
| And then when they talk about, oh, the future's gonna be great for you, you just gotta work hard and stay down. | ||
| How? A lot of people don't have savings. | ||
| They're spending it all on basic shit, like housing and groceries. | ||
| And what scares me the most is that more and more people are becoming aware of how fucked it is and all we do. | ||
| Alright, I'm sorry this wasn't centered, but the point is it goes on and on and on and on and on. | ||
| It's like a five minute video of all these testimonies. | ||
| And look, that is a very real phenomenon there. | ||
| Now, I don't want to be all doom and gloom because our economy has been rigged against us by the central banks and the Federal Reserve. | ||
| Why are housing prices and property prices up so much? | ||
| Because the banks and the centralized real estate brokers come in and they buy up all the property when you can't afford it, and then they can basically rig the market price by continuing their housing prices go up and up and up, even though the value of the dollar goes down and down and down. | ||
| So... It's a complex thing, but it's generally basically understood. | ||
| Now, here's the problem. | ||
| We don't understand the root cause. | ||
| We don't understand the root cause. | ||
| And the root cause is you got lied to about your college education and its value. | ||
| The Federal Reserve and our economic policies have... | ||
| Not on the global scale, but domestically inflated or decreased the value of the dollar, rather. | ||
| And you're paying more in taxes than you ever had before. | ||
| And so it's all of these different issues, and it all comes back to bad economic policy and excessive government growth that sucks up more of your income like a vacuum. | ||
| So that's why it's so frustrating. | ||
| And I see this trend of people complaining about where the economy is going. | ||
| I can sit here. I can blame Biden's policies. | ||
| That'd be fair. But that's not the point. | ||
| You can get rid of Biden. | ||
| You'll still have the same problems. Lower taxes. | ||
| Lower corporate taxes. | ||
| Get rid of property taxes. | ||
| That's your problem. | ||
| And nobody seems to get it. | ||
| And it's now the issue of groups like BlackRock, Buying up as many residential properties as they possibly can, and then they can manipulate the housing market. | ||
| And that's exactly what's going on. | ||
| So, there's our problems. | ||
| Most people my age come out of college with a worthless degree and $100,000 in debt. | ||
| They are paying probably 15 to 20 percent of their income in taxes, maybe even more. | ||
| When you consider sales tax and everything else, it's probably closer to 25. | ||
| So the government takes about a quarter of your earnings, and then you're trying to enter an asset market. | ||
| Let's talk about houses that is extremely inflated because the ownership of houses is centralized | ||
| by billionaire funds and hedge fund groups that can then manipulate and control the market to make themselves even | ||
| more rich. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| So that's taking an extremely complex issue and simplifying it. | ||
| Now, what's the solution? Well, there's no simple solution. | ||
| The simplest solution is cut taxes, cut taxes, cut taxes. | ||
| Don't go into debt for a college degree. | ||
| And then maybe we can look at some sort of policy or even have your legislatures look at laws to stop groups like BlackRock from buying up all residential properties. | ||
| But see, we sit here and we play these political games and we don't deal with the core issues. | ||
| And then we deal with the same common issue of libtards who vote for expanding government and vote for increasing taxes and then look into their pockets and blame the corporations that they're taking all the money from. | ||
| Yikes. Hopefully millennials will understand it and stop voting Democrat. | ||
| All right. Final segment here of the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And I am my cup overfloweth. | ||
| With content, so we're probably not going to be able to get to all of it, unfortunately. | ||
| But let's get what we can here. | ||
| Let's go to RFK Jr. | ||
| Now, Donald Trump spoke positively of RFK Jr. | ||
| During his campaign speech today in New Hampshire, he spoke positively of RFK Jr. | ||
| And RFK Jr. | ||
| happened to speak positively about Trump on a podcast as well. | ||
| Here's that in clip two. And I think that, you know, Trump is able, Trump doesn't tell them that. | ||
| Trump validates those concerns. | ||
| And I think that that makes him, and he's fearless, and he's, you know, he has all these kind of manly qualities that are, you know, the heroic figure on the white horse who's going to come in and save you. | ||
| Do I think he's actually going to do that? | ||
| No. I watched him collapse and fold in front of Anthony Fauci. | ||
| That's true. And I don't think he has the patience to understand policy or to delve into it. | ||
| And I think his approach is not about trying to solve the problems, but to break things. | ||
| And a lot of people want things broken right now. | ||
| So, you know, I completely, utterly understand his appeal. | ||
| And I don't think those Americans who support him are, you know, are bad people. | ||
| I think they're the core of our country. | ||
| Boy, oh boy. A Trump RFK Jr. | ||
| ticket, it's almost too good. | ||
| And I don't think it's possible. | ||
| You know, even the tension and the butting of heads wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing. | ||
| And maybe where Trump's weaknesses are, RFK has strengths. | ||
| And then where RFK's weaknesses are, Trump has strengths. | ||
| But let's move on for the sake of time. | ||
| There he goes. By the way, today the Biden administration announced another $500 million for Ukraine. | ||
| Ching, ching, ching, ching, ching. | ||
| Ka-ching, ka-ching, baby, Ukraine. | ||
| Oh my gosh, just what an absolute disaster that is. | ||
| Oh, the White House, on their YouTube channel, remember we played for you the confrontations, if you will, between Simon Atiba and Karine Jean-Pierre yesterday? | ||
| The White House is now editing Simon Atiba out of their YouTube videos. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You can see the edit on their videos. | |
| Wow! Talk about Orwellian. | ||
| Talk about authoritarian. | ||
| Talk about fascism. | ||
| I mean, 1984 much? | ||
| Brave New World much? They're editing out the exchanges between Simon Atiba and Karine Jean-Pierre. | ||
| Folks, this is newspeak. | ||
| This is rewriting history. | ||
| This is erasing history. | ||
| Holy smokes! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Holy smokes! Holy smokes! | |
| Do not take that lightly. | ||
| Honestly, it may seem mundane and trivial. | ||
| I'm telling you, that is as big a sign of tyranny as all the double standards you're seeing in the justice system. | ||
| That honestly might be worse. | ||
| Because now you're just saying, we've already conquered you. | ||
| You're already conquered. | ||
| This comes afterwards. | ||
| This is the next level of tyranny after they rig the justice system. | ||
| Is they now just rewrite history, erase history? | ||
| Simon Atiba was never at the White House. | ||
| That's what they'll tell you next. | ||
| Simon Atiba will fill an ethics complaint or go on podcasts talking about his mistreatment or whatever, and they'll say, Simon Atiba was never at the White House. | ||
| Look at the videos. See, he was never there. | ||
| I mean, this is... | ||
| We are going into levels of tyranny, folks, that... | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, it's horrifying. That's horrifying. | |
| Another Hunter Biden WhatsApp message to Chinese CFC associate. | ||
| The Bidens are the best. I know what I'm doing. | ||
| I know what the chairman wants. | ||
| So they're talking to all CCP spies and billionaires and taking their monies. | ||
| And oh, this is going to be actually, I said earlier, I don't know what the next big shoe to drop is. | ||
| I lied. I do know what the next big shoe to drop is. | ||
| The Republicans in the House Oversight Committee have now subpoenaed other Biden bank accounts, and they're now getting the bank records. | ||
| And let's just say the number of millions that James Comer is probably going to reveal next month, the number of millions that my guess is that James Comer is going to reveal next month is going to be probably about 50 million or more. | ||
| The Bidens have taken probably more than $50 million on record in their bank accounts from foreign nationals, and they're about to get all these bank records. | ||
| Yeah. So that's actually your next big shoe to drop. | ||
| But this is not abnormal. | ||
| Let's flash back. Nancy Pelosi's son, Paul, was involved in five companies probed by the feds. | ||
| So all of these people get probed. | ||
| All these people get investigated because all of them are taking foreign money. | ||
| But when it reaches a top-level Democrat Party member, the investigations stop. | ||
| Every single time without fail. | ||
| Now, Nancy Pelosi was asked about the Biden scandal, and it went like this in clip five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If the president says he never talked about business in Victoria, have worked to save women from a very destructive Republican Party in this house. | |
| You should be worried about that. | ||
| Does any of this bother you, Speaker Pelosi? | ||
| Thank you. What bothers me are the Republicans standing in the way of your reproductive freedom. | ||
| I mean, you gotta give it to Pelosi. | ||
| She is a miserable hag, see you next Tuesday, and a politically corrupt bitch, the likes of which D.C. could never even dream of. | ||
| But you gotta give it to her. | ||
| I mean, she's committed. She does not even blink. | ||
| Hillary Vaughn comes up to her. | ||
| And she somehow makes it about Republicans. | ||
| And she says, the Republicans in the Oversight Committee, they're the problem. | ||
| They're the ones exposing the crimes. | ||
| So you have no comment on the Biden crime family? | ||
| What I have a comment on is the Republicans trying to stop you from killing your child. | ||
| I mean, that is amazing. | ||
| I mean, I gotta tip my cap to Pelosi. | ||
| I mean, don't get me wrong. | ||
| She is as corrupt as they come. | ||
| But, you know, it's like if I'm a sports fan... | ||
| And another player makes a great play on the field. | ||
| I tip my cap. | ||
| I say, hey, that was a great play. | ||
| Whether I like it or not, you might be beating me, but that was an impressive play. | ||
| I mean, Pelosi, she is the cream of the crop when it comes to politically corrupt commitment and the lies that they tell in their propaganda. | ||
| So I tip my cap to a great, one of the all-time corrupt politicians of all time, Nancy Pelosi. | ||
| If there's a Mount Rushmore of corrupt politicians, Nancy Pelosi's on it. | ||
| I mean, you gotta tip your cap to greatness. | ||
| That woman has been lying and cheating and stealing for 50 freaking years. | ||
| And never even blinks. | ||
| Never even slows down. | ||
| Never even takes any damage. | ||
| Wow. Might look like death warmed over, but she's still out there kicking. | ||
| Meanwhile, Pelosi wants to violate the Constitution by placing term limits on the Supreme Court, but not Congress. | ||
| Well, we all know why that is. | ||
| They want Clarence Thomas off the Supreme Court. | ||
| He just drives them insane. | ||
| So they're trying to get him removed from the Supreme Court. | ||
| That's all that's about. Biden is committing $40 billion to building internet infrastructure. | ||
| What's that really about? He doesn't care whether you have access to the internet. | ||
| They need their central bank digital currency. | ||
| IMF proposes global central bank digital currency and move towards cashless society so they can control the people. | ||
| That's why Biden committed $40 billion to internet infrastructure. | ||
| They have to have everybody on the grid so they can control your access to money. | ||
| That's what's really going on. | ||
| Trump calls for election of school principals, says parents should be able to fire them and expel the communists. | ||
| Hmm, an interesting proposal. | ||
| He also had this funny thing to say at his rally today in clip four, and tell me if he's wrong. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Somebody said, you know, for a guy that got 80 million votes, | |
| you know, for a guy that got 80 million votes, you know, when they see like today, I saw the hats, I saw the this, I | ||
| saw everything. | ||
| I see scarves with Trump, Trump, win, win, you won, a hundred different things. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And he said, the guy got 80 million votes. Nobody's ever seen a hat say Biden. | |
| I've never seen anybody wear a Biden hat, a Biden shirt. | ||
| I don't even know if I've ever seen a Biden voter. | ||
| But yeah, oh yeah, you imagine somebody saying, I've never seen a Trump ad or a Trump voter. | ||
| Yeah, right, you're just a liar. | ||
| All right, that does it. We'll be back tomorrow. | ||
| It's going to be loaded again, folks, for almost a year now. | ||
| It's been so long, I thought it was years. | ||
| I was told no, it's actually been about nine months since Turbo Force has been in stock | ||
| at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| But ladies and gentlemen, we're going to do this together because I know there's a lot | ||
| of people out there that love Turbo Force just like I do. | ||
| I'm shamelessly addicted to caffeine. | ||
| I'm not going to lie. | ||
| About 500 milligrams a day. | ||
| I've just accepted this in my 30s. | ||
| That's how it's going to go. | ||
| So there it is. So Turbo Force is my go-to. | ||
| I don't like the toxic energy drinks. | ||
| I don't like the processed sugar. | ||
| I don't like the high fructose corn syrup. | ||
| I don't like the acidic taste. | ||
| I don't like any of it. | ||
| But man, oh man, that caffeine, that energy, it's really necessary at times, isn't it? | ||
| So we just found a solution. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus, your same favorite ingredients, your same favorite flavor, but now it's in the canister. | ||
| No longer in the packets, now in the canister. | ||
| So a better bang for your buck and more control over how much you want to put into your drink mix. | ||
| Some people like a lot of caffeine. | ||
| Some people might say, hey, that's too much for me. | ||
| I only want to do a half scoop. Now, I did take the plastic covering off of this, but this is brand new. | ||
| If you have ordered Turbo Force Plus from InfoWarsStore.com, it should be arriving at your house very soon. | ||
| But I wanted to do this all together on the air. | ||
| I wanted to do this as an InfoWars family on the air. | ||
| I know that you out there and my crew, we all love Turbo Force. | ||
| We've been jonesing, you might say, for Turbo Force. | ||
| So this is brand new, folks. | ||
| Brand new packet. I did take the plastic wrap off the front just to save time. | ||
| I'm not blubbing. I'm going in, folks. | ||
| I'm going in for the first time here. | ||
| So the new Turbo Force, you can already smell that flavor, lofting into the air. | ||
| So here it is. It's been too long. | ||
| I've even been waiting today for this moment. | ||
| It's been too long. I'll do one scoop. | ||
| We'll do one scoop here. | ||
| And we'll stir that around there. | ||
| So there it is. This is my first time. | ||
| We had a couple leftover packets that we were clinging on to. | ||
| Here we go. | ||
| The moment of truth has arrived. | ||
| The brand new TurboForce Plus from InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And you can get it at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 25% off the reintroductory rate. | ||
| Probably about maybe 14 ounces of water here. | ||
| There's the flavor! Hard to put that down, but I'm going to have to cover some other news. | ||
| TurboForce Plus, in stock, Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 10 hours, clean energy. | ||
| Trust me, from a guy that has fully embraced the caffeine addiction, let's say. | ||
| I shouldn't call it that. But, no, I embrace caffeine fully nowadays. | ||
| And I'm telling you, folks, if you're somebody that likes to get caffeine to help you get through the day, whether you work long hours or you just like the energy boost, whatever it is, Give Turbo Force Plus a try. | ||
| Trust me. Put the energy drinks down. | ||
| Don't even go back to them. | ||
| Don't even go back to the energy drinks. | ||
| It's back, baby. | ||
| The wait is finally over. |
Export Selection