Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
Please stand by for further details. | ||
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
Starting in the 1950s, the UN began funding scientists to measure for carbon dioxide. | ||
And in 1992, they drafted what they describe as the international legal instrument for the conservation of biological diversity, and outlined their plans to seize control of land under the guise of climate conservation, known as Agenda 21, because they wanted to accomplish their goals by the 21st century. | ||
But by 2015, they were failing and officially pushed their deadline back with Agenda 2030. | ||
In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation published Scenario for the Future of Technology and International Development. | ||
Wherein they outlined four different ways of achieving their goals, which they wrote, once crossed, these axes create a matrix of four very different futures. | ||
In 2020, they crossed the axis into the lockstep matrix. | ||
In 2022, at their 15th convention on biological diversity, COP15, the UN increased the amount of land they plan to steal to 30% by 2030. | ||
Their 30 by 30 plan will require the displacement of millions. | ||
So far, the direct confiscation approach is working in Europe. | ||
The Dutch farmers have been peacefully protesting, but they are being shot at by the police. | ||
And so the government isn't stopping. | ||
Which is why the direct approach won't work in America. | ||
Less than a year after Agenda 21 was drafted, the U.S. federal government attempted stripping away constitutional land rights from the Bundy family in Nevada. | ||
It was fought in the courts for decades and resulted in a peaceful protest with armed protesters. | ||
To avoid a gunfight, the feds backed off and adapted their plans. | ||
In 2008, the Rockefeller Foundation published America 2050, a strategy to reclaim natural resources and reform the federal role in land use policy. | ||
The America 2050 documents outline which areas of the country will be depopulated and which areas will be politically absorbed into 10 new mega-regions. | ||
The Rockefellers envision most of the depopulation to occur in the central corridor of the United States. | ||
These are the same states that experienced the most COVID vaccine deaths, a massive area that is not included in the America 2050 infrastructure map and excluded from the new high-speed rail system planned. | ||
A big part of Rockefeller's America 2050 is the high-speed rail in America plan, which requires the use of existing railways for its implementation. | ||
Some are suggesting that this is why we are seeing so many train derailments. | ||
There have been over a dozen derailments and chemical spills on railways in just the past few months, some of which, like the one in East Palestine, are highly suspicious. | ||
And these chemical spills could be used as an excuse by the state to evacuate you from your homes and steal your land. | ||
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as Superfund, was enacted by Congress in 1980. | ||
The Superfund provides the EPA with the authority to seize control of private lands for long-term remedial response actions during the event of a toxic disaster. | ||
If what we are being told about the chemicals that were burned and released... | ||
All right, ladies and gentlemen, you can find the latest Greg Reese report at banned.video. | ||
But now you may have to go to madmaxworld.tv. | ||
We're on URL number 100 or 1,000 or 100,000. | ||
I don't know. We're the most banned people in the world. | ||
It's an honor. Ladies and gentlemen, it is Wednesday, March 8th, 2023. | ||
This is the InfoWars War Room. | ||
Brought to you by Infowarsstore.com. | ||
I'm your host, Owen Troyer, with you for the next three hours. | ||
We have an open schedule right now, and I plan on taking a lot of phone calls. | ||
There's an intent there. | ||
But we may also have a couple guests coming on. | ||
One, to follow up on the current status of what's going on in East Palestine. | ||
We shouldn't forget those people. | ||
But then the subject of the day, which I intend on taking calls, probably will open up the phone lines in the first hour even. | ||
The subject is, and we may be a day behind on this, but perhaps it ends up working better this way. | ||
After last night's, you may call it a dud, on Tucker Carlson, there may be some strategery there, or maybe some censorship. | ||
And so I want to get your response in the audience, specifically on what you think went on Did Tucker Carlson get told not to put it out? | ||
Did they not put it out for a strategic reason? | ||
Or was this the plan all along? | ||
What do you think about the unseen footage? | ||
And I realized something too. | ||
And this was suggested to me. | ||
And I had to think it out in my head how I could properly do this. | ||
Something I don't believe has ever been done before. | ||
And that is, it is International Women's Day today, by the way. | ||
We all love women. And so I was thinking, it was suggested to me, why don't you do a female caller-only show? | ||
And I thought, there's no way. | ||
It's never been done. | ||
It couldn't be done. Talk radio is a male-dominated audience. | ||
There's no secret there. | ||
But if there was anywhere that could do it, it would be right here. | ||
Now, here's the catch as I was thinking this out. | ||
Folks, it's the year 2023. | ||
So if I have an all-women's call-in show, then men technically can still call in, identify as a woman, and you're good to go. | ||
So you see that? | ||
We're going to kill two birds with one stone today. | ||
We're going to take your calls on the unseen, now seen January 6 footage, what you expect to come, and what do you think happened last night. | ||
Was there censorship? Was there strategy? | ||
From only female callers. | ||
But since it's 2023 here on International Women's Day, you can call in if you're a man. | ||
All you got to do is identify as a woman. | ||
Simple as that. You see that? | ||
That wasn't hard at all. | ||
So we get to take everyone's calls today and we get to dedicate the phone lines to women callers only on International Women's Day. | ||
We're geniuses around here. | ||
And we wouldn't be able to do that without the insanity of the liberal left. | ||
Now, I do have news to cover before I do that with some video clips. | ||
And if you're looking at signs, is Kevin McCarthy good? | ||
Is Kevin McCarthy bad? | ||
What can we expect? | ||
There's another sign here that I think is a positive. | ||
Zelensky says, Kevin McCarthy should visit Ukraine. | ||
To me, that's like, he's not really fully buying into this. | ||
Maybe the House Republicans are ready to change their stance entirely on the war in Ukraine. | ||
And so, Kevin McCarthy's got to get the old what-for. | ||
He's got to get the old how-to. | ||
He's got to be drawn in by Zelensky. | ||
Oh, come on to Ukraine! | ||
Wait a second. I thought there was a crazy war being waged. | ||
I thought it was cities being destroyed. | ||
Or is that not happening? Or I'm confused. | ||
Come on down, Kevin McCarthy. | ||
We don't have any problems in the United States. | ||
We don't have a wide-open southern border. | ||
Let me ask you this. And I actually looked into this last night, and it's not even close. | ||
I asked myself two questions. | ||
One I wasn't sure about, but one I knew, and then it wasn't even close. | ||
Which number do you think is higher? | ||
The number of Russians that have invaded Ukraine or the number of illegal immigrants that have invaded the United States of America in the last 12 months? | ||
Where's the real invasion? | ||
Now, both of those phenomenons are costing us hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
Southern border invasion costing us hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
Russian invasion of Ukraine costing us hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
And none of it has to cost us anything. | ||
Actually, we don't have to be involved in Ukraine at all. | ||
And we could shut down the illegal immigration at the southern border, at least get it under control, if we really wanted to. | ||
But no, instead we just get milked, we just get tossed and pulled and tugged. | ||
Not like a, you know, Maxwell-Epstein type of way with Bill Clinton. | ||
But no, we have to fund the invasion of our southern border and then we have to fund to stop the invasion of Ukraine's eastern border. | ||
And actually, about ten times the number Of illegal immigrants have invaded our country since Russia invaded Ukraine as Russians that have gone into Ukraine. | ||
About 10 times is the actual number. | ||
And it's hard to get a real read. | ||
They believe it's about 150, maybe 250,000 troops max. | ||
Russians that have gone over the eastern border of Ukraine. | ||
Again, the numbers are hard to get any real number there, but say 150 to 250. | ||
And we've had more than a million. | ||
We have had over a million illegal border crossings in the last 12 months. | ||
Actually, I think the number was closer to 2 million. | ||
So, yeah. | ||
Where's the real invasion? | ||
Have more Russians crossed the eastern border of Ukraine, or have more illegal immigrants crossed the southern border | ||
of the United States of America? | ||
Which one is the real invasion? | ||
Which one really impacts us? | ||
So, when you put it into that perspective, but clearly they're trying to bring in McCarthy | ||
They're trying to get him in. | ||
I mean, what do you think they're flying him out to you? | ||
Or why do you think Zelensky wants McCarthy to visit Ukraine? | ||
To show him the war? | ||
Please. I mean, I guess if he... | ||
I mean, it's not like Zelensky goes to the actual war zones. | ||
What, is he going to go around and show all the cities that have been completely turned to rubble and destroyed? | ||
To say, see, we need your help? | ||
Well, if this is what our help is doing, I'm not so sure we should keep helping. | ||
But no, Zelensky's not going to go to an actual war zone. | ||
So what is he going to do? He's going to bring McCarthy into Kiev? | ||
What, are they going to have a false air raid siren go off like they did for Biden? | ||
What, is he going to wine and dine him? | ||
Is he going to schmooze him? Is he going to put on his gay leather daddy gimp outfit and put on a show? | ||
Play the piano with his penis? | ||
What is Zelensky's plan to get McCarthy to buy in to the war in Ukraine? | ||
Why does he want him to go to Ukraine? | ||
Why is he inviting McCarthy to go to Ukraine? | ||
To me, that says McCarthy is waning on his support for the war and that the House Republicans are maybe pressuring McCarthy to take a stand and a stance, which is, we're not interested in funding this anymore. | ||
So, that's done. | ||
You may want to tell your boy over there in Ukraine, and you may want to tell Biden's accountant that the 10% for the big guy is about to dry up. | ||
We've also got some COVID vaccine news. | ||
There's actually a lot. | ||
I hope that this situation with Fauci and the origins of COVID-19 has some justice there. | ||
But boy, oh boy, there's a lot of claptrapping and clamoring And video clips. | ||
But, you know, getting the ball to the end zone would actually be nice on that deal. | ||
But good things from Rand Paul. | ||
Good things from Jim Jordan. | ||
Good things from even Redfield from the CDC. So we'll have all that coming up. | ||
Some of your favorite children's books are being rewritten by Democrats. | ||
They just want to take everything you love and break it. | ||
unidentified
|
And destroy it. | |
And then another Clinton friend meets the demise, unfortunately. | ||
And then, has Biden said anything about the weather on the West Coast yet? | ||
No? Still silent? Okay. Alright, I'm about to do a news blitz, video blitz. | ||
We do have a guest confirmed for the second hour. | ||
We're going to be talking the new J6 footage and then taking your calls as well. | ||
But before I do that, Ladies and gentlemen, Infowarsstore.com has done it again. | ||
A brand new, groundbreaking, game-changing product. | ||
This time, it's turmeric toothpaste by Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals. | ||
Introducing the brand new turmeric toothpaste by Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals. Experience high-quality toothpaste and help support your oral health today. | ||
Dr. Jones Naturals is helping you step up your oral hygiene with the new non-fluoride turmeric toothpaste. | ||
Turmeric has long been used in ancient times to help support your health and soothe inflammation. | ||
Dr. Jones has added it to their toothpaste formula to help support inflammation of the gums. | ||
Try the new Turmeric toothpaste today by Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals and experience high-quality oral health. | ||
This is good for safely whitening your teeth, naturally fluoride-free, mint natural flavor, and of course helps support gum inflammation. | ||
And from an avid user of the different Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals toothpastes that have been featured at InfoWarsStore.com, did you ever think you'd have a favorite toothpaste? | ||
Well, I didn't, but now I do. | ||
And now there's another one from Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals line of toothpaste, and that's the Turmeric Toothpaste Triple Action Makes Your Gums Feel Super. | ||
So thank you to Dr. | ||
Jones Naturals for the latest in your toothpaste line. | ||
I'm looking forward to adding this to my oral health routine. | ||
And you can get it right now exclusively at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
All right. Let's do this. | ||
Let's just start going through the video list here. | ||
Let's just catch up really quickly here. | ||
Because the debate about January 6th is obviously raging. | ||
It was the same story last night and this morning with the mainstream news running cover for the J6 committee, running cover for the Democrat narrative that has just been completely destroyed by Tucker Carlson. | ||
But it's funny, while I will say you're getting a little bit of this coverage on Fox News, there's only so much they can do on cable TV. But showing you what we see here in clip 14, and I know we've covered this, but I just wanted to air this clip one more time for you because what are you looking at on the screen here? | ||
What does this look like on the screen here? | ||
Are you looking at an insurrection at the Capitol on January 6th? | ||
No. Are you looking at an invasion at our southern border? | ||
No. No, what you're looking at Is a group of violent leftists known as Antifa raiding a police training center and firebombing it. | ||
And then attacking police who respond to the scene of the crime. | ||
Now, you don't see anything like that from January 6th. | ||
Nobody firebombing anything. | ||
Nobody having an agenda to go out there and do destruction and cause harm and hurt people. | ||
Now, that's exactly what that group of about 150 Antifa did. | ||
And I mean, look, I'm not a leftist. | ||
And I'm not a violent activist. | ||
But I mean, let's be honest. | ||
I mean, this is a group committed to their agenda, their mission. | ||
Whatever it is, if they even know what it is, you don't get 150 people to go out in black hoodies and pants trying to disguise themselves, but... | ||
In classic criminal garb, showing up with a plan to destroy a police training headquarters. | ||
So clearly targeting police, clearly organized, clearly funded, and clearly intent on doing damage, and there was damage done. | ||
So I mean, that's a commitment. | ||
Again, I'm not a violent agitator. | ||
I don't get violent. | ||
I don't do violent protests. | ||
I'm not a leftist. | ||
I'm not involved in any of this. | ||
I'm not endorsing this. | ||
I'm just simply saying, let's be honest about this. | ||
That is an organized group that has made a commitment to violence. | ||
Some people sit there and they're kind of like, well, I don't agree with anything they're doing, but they're standing up. | ||
They're fighting the government. They're fighting back what they believe in. | ||
Again, I'm not endorsing it at all. | ||
I'm just telling you, is that not organized crime? | ||
Is that not an insurrection? | ||
By definition, it actually is an insurrection. | ||
But see, they don't show you this footage all day, all night on television. | ||
They didn't show you the footage of Antifa during Trump's inauguration when they were doing the same thing in the streets of D.C. Hurting people, destroying cars, firebombing, breaking windows, destroying infrastructure. | ||
They didn't show you that. | ||
Now they do show it whenever they incite an anti-police riot in the streets. | ||
They always show that. | ||
And then there will be buildings burning in the background and CNN and MSNBC say it's peaceful. | ||
So I do believe it's important to keep that juxtaposition in the air as we're discussing all of this. | ||
They never show you that. | ||
And it's that that they want to make out Trump supporters to be, or Proud Boys to be, or Oath Keepers to be, or all this other stuff, which of course they're not. | ||
Now, can you imagine? | ||
Again, I am not endorsing this. | ||
I'm simply putting out a hypothetical. | ||
Can you imagine if the Oath Keepers actually had a commitment and a plan to violence like Antifa did? | ||
At that police headquarters? | ||
Can you imagine if the Proud Boys actually had a commitment and a plan for violence? | ||
Like Antifa does? | ||
Could you imagine if Trump supporters actually had a plan and an intent on violence? | ||
Can you imagine? Of course, none of those groups ever planned on violence. | ||
None of those groups want to get violent. | ||
And there was never any mission for violence. | ||
But that's exactly what the left does with Antifa and Black Lives Matter. | ||
And they never show you any of their destruction. | ||
Forget about 44,000 hours from the Capitol. | ||
Forget about that. You could take... | ||
You could take a million hours of footage from conservative events, rallies, protests, marches. | ||
You could take all the footage from every conservative event, march, rally, protest ever. | ||
And they would still only be able to show you the same five minutes of clips of violence on January 6th and say this is their proof of conservatives being violent, Trump supporters being violent, Republican voters being violent, because there is no other video, there is no other evidence beyond 44,000 hours of footage from the Capitol, but throughout American history of conservative Republican Christian events. | ||
Doesn't happen. By the way, another Christian church was just firebombed here in Austin. | ||
Barely even makes the news. And it's not just Catholic churches, Baptist churches, Christian churches. | ||
It's happening to synagogues. | ||
It's happening to mosques. It's a total attack on religion. | ||
They just don't even cover it anymore. | ||
Everything they claim Trump supporters are, or Proud Boys are, or Oath Keepers are, the left literally is, and we've got thousands of hours of footage to prove that, and we don't have to deceptively edit anything. | ||
We can show you the full video, but they never show you that on TV, do they? | ||
No, they deceptively edit and cherry-pick and then claim that's what we're doing, assuming people are too stupid to know. | ||
Alright, let's quickly look at some of the latest developments with the COVID lab leak story now being accepted as the fact that that's where the virus started. | ||
And you've got people turning on Fauci now. | ||
You have... | ||
Rand Paul going on television last night, basically assuring the American people that there will be justice and Fauci will pay for what he's done. | ||
I'll believe it when I see it. | ||
But these are some of the developments. | ||
Let's first go here to clip three. | ||
Now CDC Director Robert Redfield to Congress talking about COVID-19 being made in a lab. | ||
Dr. Redfield, did you agree, in your opinion, with Dr. | ||
Anderson's assessment at the time that this virus did look engineered? | ||
I was concerned because of the presence of the furin cleavage site that we've talked about. | ||
And I think it's important to understand what that cleavage site does. | ||
That cleavage site totally changes the orientation of the binding domain of COVID. So it now, which could not see the ACE2 receptor, which is a human receptor, it totally changes the orientation now, so it has high affinity for a human receptor. | ||
So that furin cleavocyte bothered me. | ||
It didn't seem that it belonged there. | ||
And then when you look at the sequences that it used, and it's beyond the committee, but I know many of you have looked into it, The sequences that they used in those 12 nucleotides for arginine were the arginine sequences nucleotide triplet that coded for the human arginine. | ||
So why did this virus have the arginine sequences for human there, not bat? | ||
It was very disconcerting to me. | ||
It looked like this virus was engineered. | ||
Was this, what you're observing and speaking of, is this something that would be in line with gain-of-function research and the capabilities it would provide to the virus? | ||
Yeah. I mean, basically, this lab published in 2014 that they accomplished in allowing the coronaviruses that they were working with in the lab to bind to the H2 receptor in humanized mice. | ||
And the only way they did that was by reorienting the binding domain. | ||
And it was clear to them at this time that that was likely the issue in their private conversations. | ||
Yet by February 4th, a paper on the origins of COVID is drafted by four participants of the February 1 conference call. | ||
One of those participants, Dr. | ||
Anderson, completely reverses himself in an email to the president of EcoHealth, Peter Daszak, and says the main crackpot theories Going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered, and that is demonstrably false. | ||
My question to you, Mr. | ||
Redfield, did you know of any evidence that they had found within three days from February 1st to February 4th to be able to confirm that it was not created in a lab? | ||
As I mentioned earlier, unfortunately, I was excluded from those conversations. | ||
Which I found retroactively very disappointed, since I was obviously a virologist and very engaged. | ||
And I actually had asked Jeremy, Tony, Fauci, and Tedros to have these conversations. | ||
And then to be excluded, I found unusual. | ||
I do think it illustrates one point that's worth really focusing on. | ||
When you have a group of people that decide there could only be one point of view, that's problematic. | ||
And I'll keep going saying it's antithetical to science. | ||
And unfortunately, that's what they did. | ||
I can tell you, Dr. Redfield, that is the case. | ||
It's very problematic because how people suffered in this country from those, what I would call, tyrannical decisions using their positions of power and shutting down the country in the way they did. | ||
I think people definitely do feel that way. | ||
Thank you. I yield back. Now, we'll come back to the issue of him not being allowed on that phone call. | ||
Fauci didn't like Redfield snooping around asking questions. | ||
But here he is quickly explaining some suspicious events happening at the Wuhan lab leading up to COVID-19 turning into a pandemic here in clip eight. | ||
I will say, if you go back and look, it's declassified now. | ||
And I'm sure you all have your classified briefings. | ||
But the declassified information now, in September of 2019, three things happened in that lab. | ||
One is they deleted the sequences. | ||
It was highly irregular. | ||
Researchers don't usually like to do that. | ||
Second thing they did was they changed the command and control of the lab from the civilian control to the military control. | ||
Highly unusual. And I've been involved in dual-use labs when I was in the military. | ||
And the third things they did, which I think is really telling, is they led a contract to redo the ventilation system in that laboratory. | ||
So I think clearly there was strong evidence that there was a significant event that happened in that laboratory in September. | ||
It's now been declassified. | ||
You can read it. I'm sure there's more classified information around. | ||
Now getting back to the phone call, Fauci didn't want Redfield on. | ||
Here was part of Jim Jordan's time in clip four. | ||
Three years ago, if you thought it came from a lab, if you raised that, you were called a nut job. | ||
You got censored on Twitter. | ||
You were blacklisted on Twitter. | ||
You were even called a crackpot by the very scientist who in late January sent emails to Dr. | ||
Fauci and said it came from a lab. | ||
They called you crackpot. | ||
Is that right, Dr. Redfield? | ||
I think the most upsetting thing to me was the Baltimore Sun calling me a racist because I said this came from a Wuhan lab. | ||
Dr. Reptil, you ran the CDC and you were on the Coronavirus Task Force, is that right? | ||
Correct. That was formed on January 29, 2020, is that right? | ||
Correct. Two days later, Dr. | ||
Fauci gets an email from Dr. | ||
Anderson which says what? Virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. | ||
Is that accurate? That's my understanding. | ||
Did he share that email with you, by the way, Dr. | ||
Redfield? No. As a member of the task force, as a head of CDC, did he share that email with you? | ||
No. Okay. Next day, February 1st, Dr. | ||
Gary sends Dr. Fauci another email. | ||
That email says, I don't know how this happens in nature, but it would be easy to do in a lab. | ||
Did he share that email with you, Dr. | ||
Redfield? No. You didn't see either one of those emails, even though you're head of CDC, even though you're on the coronavirus task force, that had been formed just two days, three days earlier? | ||
No. Three days later, Dr. | ||
Anderson and Dr. Gary, who told us it came from a lab and emails to Dr. | ||
Fauci, that Dr. Fauci wouldn't let Dr. | ||
Redfield see. Three days later, they changed their position 180 degrees. | ||
The question is why? | ||
Mr. Wade, why would they change their position that fast when the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. | ||
Fauci, the guy who wouldn't let Dr. | ||
Redfield see the very emails that they had sent him. | ||
Dr. Redfield, head of CDC, on the Coronavirus Task Force. | ||
Why would they change their position, Mr. | ||
unidentified
|
Wade? Well, this question does lie at the heart of the issue. | |
What is pertinent, it seems to me, is there's no new scientific evidence that we can see that came available between these dates, the Jan 31st and Feb 4. | ||
Right, there's no new... I think you're... | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. So, you have to ask if there were other kinds of influence available. | |
Now, it is true that... | ||
Dr. Fauci and Dr. | ||
Farrer in London were very powerful research officials and between them they controlled... | ||
I read your testimony. I saw that. | ||
Why don't you cut to the chase and tell them what you really think was the reason. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't know what the reason was. | |
I know what it was. Go ahead. | ||
I'll let you say it because I read your testimony. | ||
I think you said it in your testimony too. | ||
Maybe you're reluctant to say it here, but go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, if you're looking at the timeline on May 21st, just So there's nine million reasons why they changed their mind. | |
I knew you'd get to it. I read that last night. | ||
Three months after So three days after they say it came from a lab, they changed their position and the only intervening event is a conference call with Dr. | ||
Fauci and Dr. Collins. Again, a call that Mr. | ||
Redfield was not allowed to be on, the head of CDC and on the Coronavirus Task Force. | ||
And then three months later, shazam, they get nine million bucks from Dr. | ||
Fauci. Well, isn't that something? | ||
So there you go. Now, we've got more on this, but I think Jim Jordan is serious, folks. | ||
I think he's a bulldog right now looking for justice, and I think Rand Paul is too. | ||
We're going to keep following this. | ||
Now, that window of time they keep mentioning, January 31st to February 8th, is interesting to me. | ||
Why? Well, I'll tell you why on the other side of this break, but there's a little hint for you on the screen right there. | ||
So I couldn't help but notice this window of time that they keep bringing up. | ||
Significance to me, we had Dr. | ||
Francis Boyle featured on the Alex Jones Show on February 4th and February 5th. | ||
And Alex was actually, he was there on the 4th. | ||
On the 5th, I was in studio interviewing Dr. | ||
Francis Boyle. And that's really when the story went massive. | ||
Bioweapons expert WHO is in on biowarfare weaponization of coronavirus. | ||
So it was the 4th and the 5th with Dr. | ||
Francis Boyle that Infowars, and there were others out there reporting it too, but we had the bioweapons expert on, Dr. | ||
Francis Boyle, breaking the news that this virus was made in a lab. | ||
Now, ironically enough, when we were going back in time and looking for these, one of the other headlines was, bioweapon release from Wuhan will... | ||
Because for vaccine mandates. | ||
So, I mean, we were predicting this stuff years in advance, but not even to harp on that. | ||
The point is, I just can't help but wonder if that Dr. | ||
Francis Boyle interview had something to do with the movements of Fauci, something to do with the movements of the others, Wanting to silence that narrative and put that narrative to rest before it could really even get out and be investigated. | ||
Because that window of time they keep talking about was the window of time in which we were breaking that story right here at Infowars. | ||
Coincidence? Was it a coincidence that the same police officer that arrested me at the Capitol was the guy being interviewed by Tucker Carlson last night? | ||
We'll have that for you later. | ||
But let's get back to the point. | ||
I do think Jim Jordan is like a bulldog or a hunting dog on the scent. | ||
And I do think Rand Paul as well. | ||
I think they want justice for this. | ||
What Fauci has done is serious stuff. | ||
Creating biological weapons, making deals with the Chinese military, paying off doctors. | ||
I mean, come on. The whole planet should be getting behind an investigation into this guy, this mad scientist, who also likes to torture puppies for Just so you know what he's into. | ||
But you saw Jim Jordan fired up in the last segment. | ||
Here's Rand Paul talking about the situation with Fauci as well in clip seven. | ||
The reason Dr. Fauci didn't want any attention drawn to this or to his funding of the lab is that ultimately he would have culpability. | ||
Ultimately, there's a responsibility because for years he had advocated for gain-of-function research. | ||
He's even quoted as saying in 2012, if a pandemic should occur, if a scientist should be bitten by an animal and the virus gets out of the lab, it would be worth the knowledge. | ||
But in late January 2020, there's a flurry of emails that go on all night long till 3 in the morning. | ||
The next day, there's a video conference and eight good friends of Fauci, scientists, famous virologists come together and they say, Dr. | ||
Fauci, we think this leaked from the lab. | ||
The virus, the sequence of the RNA is suspicious. | ||
We think it came from the lab. | ||
And at the end of the phone call, They all became convinced otherwise and they agreed to write an article saying something the opposite of what they were saying in private. | ||
So yes, Dr. Fauci and Dr. | ||
Collins and others orchestrated a cover-up. | ||
There's emails between Dr. | ||
Collins and Dr. | ||
Fauci in which Dr. | ||
Collins says this wouldn't be good for China. | ||
This wouldn't be good for science. | ||
Meaning that it wouldn't be good for the business of science, for the money that changes hands. | ||
There's so much going on here, and when the American public finally find out, I mean, there's going to be such dissatisfaction in this country like you can't believe. | ||
For example, We know that the NIH gave money to American universities who then gave it to military researchers. | ||
These are researchers with the title of General and Colonel in the People's Liberation Army. | ||
Our universities gave NIH money to them to do military research. | ||
This is a real problem. | ||
When the truth gets out there, when this is finally declassified, it's going to be explosive. | ||
And let's hope we get that truth from Jim Jordan, Rand Paul and others. | ||
Honestly, Redfield was kind of wishy-washy and flip-floppy on all of this when it was breaking down. | ||
He was doing good things, saying good things, but doing bad things, saying bad things. | ||
So it looks like he at least knows where the criminal element lies, and he's at least comfortable enough in whatever he was doing at the time to call the truth out now, and know he's not going to be culpable when these investigations come out, because here he is again in his testimony saying, no, it's true, we funded the gain-of-function research. | ||
unidentified
|
Clip five. Thank you. | |
Thank you, Chairman. | ||
For two years, myself and the other Republicans on this subcommittee connected the dots. | ||
We exposed the evidence supporting our strong belief that COVID was developed and leaked from the Wuhan lab. | ||
And during those same two years, the same Democrats that sit on this committee, they only hindered, they obstructed, they refused to hold hearings and get to the truth. | ||
Now, we see mounting evidence supporting the COVID-19, originated from the lab in Wuhan, China, run by the Communist Chinese Party. | ||
And this hearing is about getting to the truth. | ||
I thank the chairman for making this the very first hearing because the American people who have seen just as many fellow Americans die from COVID, as nearly as many die from COVID, that died in every war since the American Revolution combined, deserve to know the truth. | ||
Dr. Redfield, you pointed to the lab leak theory even before we did. | ||
In mid-January of 2020, you expressed concerns to Dr. | ||
Fauci, to Jeremy Farrer of UK's Wellcome Trust, and to Dr. | ||
Tedros of World Health Organization that, quote, we had to take the lab leak hypothesis with extreme seriousness. | ||
And you urged Dr. Fauci to investigate both the lab and the natural hypotheses. | ||
Shortly thereafter, on February 1st, Farrer convened a meeting of a group of 11 top scientists across five time zones and asked Dr. | ||
Fauci to join, and he wrote, quote, My preference is to keep this group really tight. | ||
Obviously, ask everyone to treat in total confidence, unquote. | ||
Dr. Redfield, you were excluded from this call, but up until then, you were included in every other conversation. | ||
What changed? Why do you think that you were excluded from these conversations? | ||
Thank you very much. | ||
I think, just to emphasize, in early to mid-January, I did have multiple calls with Fauci, Farrar, and Tedros about how important I thought it was that science get engaged in aggressively pursuing both hypotheses. | ||
I also expressed as a clinical virologist that I felt it was not scientifically plausible That this virus went from a bat to humans and became one of the most infectious viruses that we have for humans. | ||
All viruses are not the same. | ||
So when you look at coronaviruses for SARS and MERS, for example, when they entered the human species, which they did via an intermediate, they never learned how to go human to human. | ||
Even to this day, they don't know how to go human to human. | ||
So you can't equate Ebola with a coronavirus. | ||
unidentified
|
Now, why do you think you were excluded from those calls? | |
Because it was told to me that they wanted a single narrative and that I obviously had a different point of view. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. In emails following the conference call, four of the eleven scientists told Fauci that they all found the genetic sequence inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory, basically what you're saying. | |
However, just three days later, these four scientists had drafted a paper arguing the exact opposite, and that's now the infamous proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. | ||
Our investigations show this paper was prompted by Dr. | ||
Fauci, among others, with a goal to disprove the lab leak theory. | ||
What is the likelihood that these scientists came across additional information just three days after making these statements to conclude with such certainty that COVID-19 came from nature instead of the lab leak that they thought it was three days earlier? | ||
Yeah, I think it's unfortunate. | ||
Again, I've said this before, that this whole approach that was taken on February 1st and subsequently in the month of February, if you really want to be truthful, it's antithetical to science. | ||
Thank you. Science has debate, and they squashed any debate. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. Given what we know now and looking at all the conversations in February of 2020 and before the release of the paper, do you think that Dr. | |
Fauci used this paper to hide the gain-of-function research created this virus? | ||
I can't talk about Fauci's motivation. | ||
unidentified
|
Do you think that the paper does hide the truth? | |
I think it's an inaccurate paper that basically was part of a narrative that they were creating. | ||
Remember, this pandemic did not start in January at the seafood market. | ||
We now know there was infections all the way back into September. | ||
This was a narrative that was decided that they were going to say this came from a wet market, and they were going to do everything they could to support it to negate any discussion about the possibility that this came from elaborate. | ||
unidentified
|
I got 20 seconds left. Dr. | |
Fauci was affirmatively told in an email that NIAID had a monetary relationship with the Wuhan Institute through EcoHealth Alliance. | ||
He was told this in January 27th of 2020. | ||
Do you think that Dr. Fauci intentionally lied under oath to Senator Paul when he vehemently denied NIH's funding of gain-of-function research? | ||
I think there's no doubt that NIH was funding gain-of-function research. | ||
unidentified
|
Is it likely that American tax dollars funded the gain-of-function research that created this virus? | |
I think it did, not only from NIH, but from the State Department, USAID, and from DOD. It's pretty bombshell news right there, isn't it? | ||
That's a pretty big deal. | ||
It really is amazing how corrupt the health officials were, from Anthony Fauci here in the U.S. to Matt Hancock in the U.K., And now mainstream news that's usually in the tank for the establishment, the Daily Telegraph has called for Matt Hancock to be arrested. | ||
Yeah. Him and Anthony Fauci and the rest of these psychotic mad scientists that created a virus in a lab and then lied about it, created a response protocol that led to more death and now medical tyranny as the precedent. | ||
Yeah, there need to be a lot of arrests. | ||
Many arrests. But isn't it amazing? | ||
You just had the CDC director admit that Anthony Fauci was hiding the truth and funding gain-of-function research that he lied about under oath. | ||
That's the CDC director saying that. | ||
It's like, you know, game over, under oath, kind of a big deal. | ||
And then you have text messages, again, from the UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock saying, we need to scare the public. | ||
We need to release the new variant. | ||
We need to force them to comply. | ||
I mean, my goodness. Is there any justice system left? | ||
Does anybody in any justice or law enforcement department in the world have any balls? | ||
Have a spine? | ||
Are you all invertebrate? | ||
Why are these men not in jail? | ||
Matt Hancock, Anthony Fauci. | ||
Unbelievable. Democrat bill would force parents to undergo vaccine education session before exempting children from jabs. | ||
Oh, have your little propaganda session, your little struggle session, your little torture and torment. | ||
Hopefully that'll get you to break. | ||
Hopefully that will break you. | ||
One plus one equals three, Wilson. | ||
One plus one equals four, Wilson. | ||
One plus one equals five, Wilson. | ||
What does one plus one equal? | ||
You will get the vaccine safe and effective. | ||
You will inject your child with our experimental technology. | ||
Or you'll lose your kid. | ||
Healthy 24-year-old athlete. | ||
Doctors told me I was just stressed, but actually I've got cancer. | ||
Only found out after collapsing at supermarket. | ||
Is this just another vaccine side effect? | ||
Don't expect the media to tell you. | ||
Now, I don't know how much time I'm going to have for this, and it's a little bittersweet. | ||
There have been two big bombshell videos from Project Veritas since the resignation of James O'Keefe, or firing, however you want to put it. | ||
And it's serious stuff. | ||
I mean, it's still undercover footage, bombshell stuff, and it's just kind of been a little bittersweet, and it just hits a little different without O'Keefe there. | ||
But this is still what's going on. | ||
Project Veritas still releasing it. | ||
Here's a little taste. Every parent with a kid in public school should be deeply troubled by the latest Project Veritas release. | ||
unidentified
|
Here it is, clip 10. My sexual identity was always part of my work because I believe in making connections with kids. | |
Here's the thing with DVI. If you push too hard doing the work and you get this pushback, it will be definitely before you do the work again. | ||
Right. So it needs to be incremental. | ||
Certainly. And I gotta tell you, I am not opposed to this question, right? | ||
Why do we need to sexualize kids at a young age after the pandemic? | ||
I'm like, how could this be? | ||
I mean, it's dangerous, right? | ||
It's dangerous. For me, it's dangerous for all people who want to do this work. | ||
Do you encourage your teachers to write, like, a curriculum advanced in diversity, equity, inclusion work? | ||
Yes, covertly. | ||
Every district is doing this covertly. | ||
Every district is doing this covertly? | ||
Except for the covertly black and white thing. | ||
I'm not going to sugarcoat it. | ||
But we need the people, otherwise the work that myself and my generation have done is for naught. | ||
And that's where I'm starting. | ||
I'm not going to curse you on the crisis of actions, because I really feel that way. | ||
Folks, maybe we'll take the latest Project Veritas videos, because they're getting about 10% of their interactions and | ||
impressions since the departing of James O'Keefe. | ||
But, I mean, that's still hard-hitting stuff. | ||
I mean, you've got Education administrators talking about how they like to sexualize kids. | ||
There we go. There it is. | ||
We are now in our number two of the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
And we're now joined by a journalist who might be doing some of the best work when it comes to covering the January 6th defendants and those court cases, and that is Cara Castronova. | ||
And she joins me now, and I just wanted to get her response, what she thought about the unseen footage on Tucker Carlson Monday night. | ||
Then maybe get her reaction to last night's kind of a dud. | ||
There was a bit of a buildup. Maybe it was a bit of a dud. | ||
Do you think it was strategic? Do you think Fox News punted the story? | ||
And then what has the response been, to her knowledge, from the January 6th defendants she's covered and the families she's spoken to? | ||
Kara Castronova joins me now. | ||
Kara, let's start with the beginning. | ||
The unseen footage changes the narrative, destroys the narrative really. | ||
It should change the outcome of every single case and make the Democrat J6 committee with the fake Republicans in there totally illegitimate if not criminal. | ||
What's your response to the unseen footage that we saw Monday night? | ||
Well, you know, I was happy to see it. | ||
It's something, I mean, it's something I didn't know already, and a lot of us didn't know, but it's, you know, vindicating to have, I guess, the American public at large see it on a station like Fox. | ||
People have been calling me apologizing to me, saying, Kara, I should have believed you. | ||
Oh my God, now, you know, now that Tucker Carlson has said it, people believe it. | ||
I had spoken to so many lawyers telling them that there was discovery out there that wasn't seen and things like that, and they told me, no, that doesn't happen. | ||
You know, you must be getting your faxed. | ||
And I literally had lawyers call me yesterday apologizing to me saying I should have listened to you. | ||
You were right about all this January 6th stuff. | ||
So, you know, I guess they have to see it on mainstream media to believe it, which is unfortunate because this is stuff that we've been reporting on. | ||
And I know Infowars has too for a very long time. | ||
And yeah, last night's footage was, you know, I expected to see more. | ||
And what I think happened, honestly, is that I know that a lot of senators and House members and probably the Biden regime put some calls into Rupert Murdoch and started pressuring him. | ||
They're like, you know, pull the plug on this Tucker stuff. | ||
So I feel like They're like, let's just take a chill pill tonight and regroup tomorrow. | ||
That's just my gut instinct because I know there was a lot of pressure coming from traitors like Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney and Chuck Schumer who were trying to censor a journalist. | ||
Like, Tucker Carlson's a journalist. | ||
He has First Amendment protected right to put this footage out there, to interpret it in whichever way he thinks is the right way. | ||
And that's his right. And for them to, say, pull the plug on a journalist is absolutely insane and evil. | ||
Now, I can't believe the boldness of Chuck Schumer, as if he wasn't bold enough going on television saying, we're going to use the intelligence agencies against the President of the United States. | ||
And then we saw what happened. | ||
Then he goes on and demands, Fox News pulls a host off television. | ||
I mean, this is the stuff authoritarians dream of. | ||
This is the stuff tyrants exhibit on a daily basis. | ||
It's Chuck Schumer. Now, what about the response? | ||
Or, you know, let me just actually respond to something else you said. | ||
And I don't want to get too much into this, but I've had this similar situation for some of my legal cases where I'll be on the phone with other lawyers and I'll tell them what's going on, or even my own lawyers. | ||
And I'm like, this is what's going on. | ||
They're like, I don't believe you. That's not how this works. | ||
No, that's not how this works. There's no way that's actually going on, Owen. | ||
And I'm like... Okay. | ||
And then my own lawyers see it happen in court and they're like, whoa, I didn't realize what this actually was. | ||
I mean, they really want you dead. | ||
Like, they really hate you. And other lawyers that thought it was impossible. | ||
So it's a common thing now, people realizing how corrupt the justice system really is. | ||
They were believing it couldn't be that way in America, but sadly we're here. | ||
But now what about the families? | ||
What about the defendants? I know you've been talking to some of them. | ||
Have they heard the footage getting released? | ||
Are there lawyers getting access to this? | ||
How's that going? Well, okay, so a lot of the defendants are, like, from what I know, I had spoken to a few of them that are in jail that are down there in D.C. Gulag. | ||
And they were overjoyed that the footage, obviously, was played because, you know, it vindicates them. | ||
It shows the American public that there's maybe a different narrative. | ||
They're hoping that Tucker will keep playing footage and that the footage will be released to everybody eventually. | ||
That will, you know, start to change the public, I guess, opinion of who they were. | ||
They were protesters, not domestic terrorists. | ||
So I think that they were very overjoyed. | ||
And I don't even think that's an exaggeration. | ||
They were so happy on Monday night when Tucker put that footage out. | ||
And their families were, too. | ||
Even though I guess a lot of this footage really just applies a lot to certain individuals, it speaks to the event at large. | ||
I know that Jacob Shansley, of course, is overwhelmed with joy that this has come out. | ||
He's been in jail For two years now, and spent a lot of time in solitary confinement, was treated very badly because he was looked at by the Department of Justice as the quote-unquote face of the insurrection, because the media made him the face of it. | ||
It wasn't by his choice, and I actually heard his judge sentence him and say, because you're the face of the insurrection, I have no choice but to be very harsh in my sentencing, which is the most unconstitutional crazy thing I've ever heard, and I have that respect. | ||
I have that information. | ||
But yes, the people are very happy, and I'm sure Jacob is. | ||
I haven't spoken to him personally, but I've spoken to his lawyer, and he's very happy that that footage came out on Monday night. | ||
So how do they use this footage? | ||
What is the next move? Because I know a lot of lawyers are probably saying to you, and a lot of lawyers are realizing now, well, you can't even do this. | ||
You can't withhold evidence. | ||
You can't withhold evidence during discovery. | ||
You can't withhold exculpatory evidence from a defendant. | ||
That will get cases tossed out. | ||
So what happens next? | ||
I mean, I don't know what happens next because all this is so unprecedented. | ||
It's so bizarre. Nothing like this has ever happened in American history. | ||
And that's why so many lawyers that heard about this didn't really believe it. | ||
And there's 41,000, I believe, hours of footage. | ||
And it's all in one kiosk in Washington, D.C., where lawyers literally have to get time slots to go view it. | ||
And what if they don't live in Washington, D.C.? You know, and how much resources do they really have to go to Washington, D.C. and sit there in this kiosk? | ||
It's not like they have access to it in their offices or their clients could see it. | ||
They have to actually physically, right now, this is the case, go to Washington, D.C. and view it from there. | ||
And it's a lot of footage. | ||
And I don't think that many people know what they're looking for. | ||
That's why I do think it needs to be released to the public so the public could digest it and open source it. | ||
But yes, I don't know. | ||
I know I went off on a tangent with that, but with the lawyers obtaining this footage, it's still not every lawyer has obtained it yet, and they're trying to work that out right now. | ||
And I don't think the lawyers would even know what to do with the 44,000 hours of footage. | ||
It's just so much footage to digest before a trial. | ||
A lot of these guys already had trials. | ||
They have trials in two weeks. | ||
They have a trial. There's about five people right now on trial for January 6th. | ||
So how are they supposed to digest 44,000 hours of footage that should have been released years ago? | ||
Well, that's the thing is it should be released to the public. | ||
Let the digital info warriors pile through this stuff, you know, thousands of us, and it'll be a lot easier to go through this and human source this out. | ||
I'm curious, though, has Chansley or any of his family or his lawyers ever talked about that situation with the police where he's being escorted around the Capitol? | ||
Did he feel he was set up? | ||
Did he feel they were trying to help? | ||
Have you heard anything about that? | ||
For sure. And I know that I had seen that. | ||
I already knew this stuff. That's the part that drives me insane. | ||
There's so much more video in there. | ||
And I really hope Tucker shows it. | ||
And I have a sick feeling he might not. | ||
And for a lot of reasons in my own head. | ||
There's the Roseanne Boylan being beaten footage. | ||
There's multiple cops undercover wearing cameras that are in... | ||
I've seen this footage, but it's under protective seal, so I've only seen it. | ||
I've not been able to actually release it to the public. | ||
So I know this footage is there, and I hope that Tucker's team is able to find it. | ||
But in regards to Jacob Chansley, He took a plea deal very early on because he was terrified. | ||
And he had a really bad lawyer that a lot of people think was possibly working with the other side, a gentleman who approached him and convinced him how important it was that he take this plea deal or else he was going to be crucified and go to jail for decades. | ||
So he took this plea deal very early on. | ||
And I don't think he realized how much exculpatory evidence there was to redeem him. | ||
And I think he was just afraid because they were really using him as this kind of like precedent they wanted to set with, okay, well, we got the shaman pled out to You know, four years or whatever it was, you know, everybody else, you better play out. | ||
Don't take this to trial or you're going to wind up going to jail for 20 years. | ||
So I don't think he really even saw that footage, to be honest. | ||
So he was in jail. How could he? | ||
But he did. Well, he lived the moment. | ||
So I'm saying in his memory, he was expressing the feeling of being set up by the cops. | ||
Well, yeah, for sure. Like, I saw the footage of him walk right in the door. | ||
He's like, oh, wow. Like, he's kind of, like, really surprised that the door's open. | ||
He walks in. Wait, you saw that? | ||
You saw that exact moment? | ||
I've seen that footage, yes. | ||
How did that moment go? | ||
I could find it for you somewhere. | ||
I would just have to look for it. | ||
So was the door open for him? | ||
It was, like, already open, and cops were, like, letting people in. | ||
He's like, hey, and he just walks in like nothing. | ||
So this was after they shut the magnetic locks off and they started letting the crowd in? | ||
This was, I don't know exactly what point it is, but I've seen the video when he's literally walked right in an open door and nobody stops him. | ||
And he's like so happy to be walking into the Capitol. | ||
But that was not shown in court. | ||
No, that wasn't shown in court. | ||
He didn't go to court. He pled out because he was so free. | ||
And he had that attorney. | ||
Kara, hold it right there. We'll be right back. | ||
Well, Kara Castronova is with us and she was right. | ||
Because it's true, it's now being reported that the White House indeed pressured Fox News to shut Tucker Carlson down and they are making public statements, White House spokespersons making public statements criticizing Tucker Carlson and Fox News. | ||
For showing you information. | ||
I thought more information would be a good thing. | ||
I thought transparency would be a good thing. | ||
I thought that if this was a violent insurrection, they'd want you to see all the evidence. | ||
No, they're liars. | ||
They've been caught. Here's a perfect example. | ||
Listen to this whopper of a lie from Merrick Garland in clip 13. | ||
You've seen some of that video. | ||
What's your reaction to that? | ||
So, I don't want to comment on any particular reports. | ||
I think all Americans saw what happened on January 6th, and most of us saw it as it was happening. | ||
It was a violent attack on a fundamental tenet of American democracy. | ||
That power is peacefully transferred from one administration to another. | ||
Over a hundred officers were assaulted on that day. | ||
Five officers died. | ||
We have charged more than a thousand people. | ||
Name the five officers. | ||
Crimes on that day and more than 500 have already been killed. | ||
So that's fine. Now that's just an outright lie, folks. | ||
That is just a blatant lie. | ||
Not a single officer died that day. | ||
Now, it's been proven not only did Brian Sicknick not get hit over the head with a fire extinguisher, it's also been proven and admitted he didn't die that day. | ||
Here's the official United States Capitol Police press release from last April, two Aprils ago, excuse me, April 2021. | ||
The United States Capitol Police accepts the findings from the District of Columbia's Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that Officer Brian Sicknick died of natural causes. | ||
Natural causes, not from any violence that day. | ||
And the people that were arrested for, involved with that assault, none of them charged with attempted murder or manslaughter or anything like that. | ||
Here's CBS News, same April, admitting Brian Sicknick died of natural causes, stroke, the next day. | ||
So Sicknick... | ||
Is one officer that died the next day. | ||
Four other officers committed suicide conveniently within the next two weeks. | ||
They don't tell you that. Five Trump supporters were killed by police that day. | ||
Unarmed protesters killed by police that day. | ||
And then Merrick Garland lies to the American people. | ||
Boldly, by the way. He should be relieved of duty immediately for a lie like that. | ||
Again, everything has been disproven by the release of this footage, and this is why they're peddled to the metal to take Tucker Carlson off air and to stop any more of this footage from being released, Kara, because it proves everything they told us about January 6th was a lie. | ||
Right. For sure. I mean, I watched or listened to that Merrick Garland clip earlier when I was driving. | ||
I literally started screaming at the phone like a crazy person because it gets me so mad when they keep perpetuating that lie. | ||
I don't know how there's no repercussions for lying to the American public when you're a public figure. | ||
It's a blatant lie. Five cops were not killed that day. | ||
And I'm sick and tired of hearing about that because it's not true. | ||
Trump supporters were killed that day. | ||
Not police. And there's no proof or evidence whatsoever that those cops that committed suicide had anything to do with January 6th. | ||
That's just a narrative that they told their families. | ||
And I hate to be like, you know, the one to say it, but a lot of the wives will go along with this narrative because if their husbands died, quote unquote, in the line of duty because of January 6th, a lot more benefits come with that because I wanted to actually... | ||
seek out these women and interview them and say, did your husband know something maybe | ||
that the government didn't want them to know? | ||
Like, why did he commit suicide and drive his car off of a cliff | ||
when this was like a decorated Marine? | ||
I think in one case, it just doesn't compute. | ||
And I was going to do that investigation until I realized that a lot of these families | ||
are going to get more benefits because these deaths can be January 6th related. | ||
unidentified
|
They could call them January 6th related. | |
Wow, and you know, just as an overall point, folks, this is why you have to get government out of our lives. | ||
Money and the power to distribute money is ultimately the power to corrupt. | ||
Just like they corrupted doctors and mainstream news and hospitals to go along with the COVID farce with payouts, you're thinking maybe they did the same thing potentially with these officers, sadly. | ||
No, for sure, yeah. And I guess it's a human thing, right? | ||
A family that loses, he commits suicide, there's a wife, kids, they're going to want those benefits and the funds that come. | ||
It's almost like after 9-11, rightfully a lot of families got a settlement and stuff like that. | ||
And if you could say your husband, who was an officer, died because of January 6th in the line of duty, then you get more benefits and you continue to get his pension differently than if he just would have committed suicide when he wasn't working. | ||
So that's the reason I never really pursued that story, because I just knew that they would never really want to go against the narrative that their husbands were victims of January 6th and death victims of January 6th, which they are not. | ||
I'm sorry. That's just the truth. | ||
Yeah, and they even admit that. | ||
But again, it destroys the narrative. | ||
But, you know, the more and more you realize that This is their linchpin to turn the American people into so-called terrorists so that they can lock up their political opposition or silence their political opposition. | ||
That's what this is all about. They have to make an example of these innocent people. | ||
They have to use this gigantic lie and farce in order to put American people into a state of fear. | ||
Where if you speak up against the establishment, if you speak up against the regime, or God forbid, show up to the Capitol building with a sign or a flag, you're done. | ||
They're coming for you, they'll destroy your life, and they won't even allow you access to evidence that would get you off. | ||
Right. And the shaman is the perfect example of that. | ||
He's just a regular American kid. | ||
Nice guy. Vegetarian. | ||
Doesn't eat meat. Doesn't kill bugs. | ||
A complete hippie. Didn't want to get the vaccine. | ||
I think one of the reasons he left the Navy in the first place was because of all the vaccine requirements at the time. | ||
And it wasn't even a COVID shot then. | ||
And just really kind of like a really peaceful guy. | ||
And I think they made a really good example out of him where people would be like he's carrying his megaphone like his weapon was his megaphone. | ||
He has his megaphone on him slung on him when he walks in. | ||
So it kind of sears that image into people's mind, like, oh my God, I'm not going to go to a rally and shout into a megaphone. | ||
You know, I could get in a lot of trouble for that. | ||
I could go to jail for many years. | ||
The government could come after me. | ||
So people are afraid to go to protests now. | ||
And I know that for a fact because I organize protests. | ||
And a lot of people will not show up because they don't want to be associated with the protests because of what happened on January 6th. | ||
I mean, again... 364 days of the year, Liberal Democrats will tell you how bad police are, and they'll promote protests where they chant, all police are bad, kill police. | ||
But there's one day of the year they love the police. | ||
There's one day a year they love to memorialize the police. | ||
Is that because they care? No, it's because it's a political prop. | ||
It's a political stunt on January 6th. | ||
Oh, they care about the police, not the police that killed five unarmed protesters on January 6th. | ||
If that happened any other day of the year at any other venue, there'd be riots in the streets and | ||
unidentified
|
the Democrats would promote it. Well, for sure. And the sad thing is most Americans don't know | |
about those four people. Is Tucker Carlson going to bring light to that? I would hope so. I would | ||
hope so because I think people would be like just the way they're shocked about the shaman. | ||
Nobody knows about Roseanne Boylan being beaten by Lila Morris, police officer Lila Morris. Nobody | ||
knows that in America, not even people on the right. And it's only the alternate news that's | ||
reporting on that. And we've been trying to get out that her name out there and it's been | ||
impossible. So if Tucker Carlson actually mentions Roseanne and shows the video of her being beaten | ||
on the Capitol steps and she died, it's going to make people's brains explode. | ||
They're going to be like, how come we didn't know that another woman died on January 6th? | ||
How come we didn't know this? People's heads will explode, and that includes people on the left, and I think that's going to be the thing that will finally make them say, Maybe they're lying. | ||
Maybe they're lying. That's why Chuck Schumer and the installed president are freaking out right now and going crazy because they know that that footage, what's in that footage, and they know what Tucker could bring to the table if he really looks at it. | ||
Yeah, the Boylan death, the Babbitt shooting. | ||
And we know they're liars, and it's not that they're afraid of being exposed as liars. | ||
The realization they're afraid Americans will have is that they're evil. | ||
These are genuinely evil people. | ||
Now what you're seeing on the screen is scenes from the White House today where they gave out the International Woman of Courage Award. | ||
It is International Women's Day today. | ||
And they gave out the International Woman of Courage Award to a man! | ||
That's a man! | ||
unidentified
|
That's a man, baby! | |
And so there it is. | ||
International Women's Day. | ||
And men are getting the women's awards. | ||
And men are breaking the women's records. | ||
And men are becoming the first female to do this and that and the other thing. | ||
Feminism has taken an interesting turn. | ||
And they love celebrating International Women's Day. | ||
But if you ask them to define a woman, they can't do that. | ||
So I'm curious how that works. | ||
But Cara Castronova, you may not know this, is actually an elite athlete in her own respect. | ||
She's been a trainer. | ||
She's been a boxer. Now, this was something that was not even... | ||
It wasn't even in anybody's mind back when you were boxing and training. | ||
Nobody thought about men competing with women unless it was some sort of a gag or a stunt. | ||
I mean, I don't know. You might have kicked a few guys' asses along the way. | ||
But, I mean, as somebody who's competed and been successful boxing and training, I mean, if you were still in your prime and fighting and a biological man pretending to be a woman wanted to fight you, what would your response be? | ||
I mean, it's ridiculous. It would obviously be... | ||
Like you said, it wasn't even a thing when I was boxing, which shows just how quickly... | ||
It's almost like for the past couple of years. | ||
I don't know if they're messing with us. | ||
Like that footage you just showed, I hadn't seen that from the White House with Joe Biden presenting a transgender person... | ||
A female, an award that's made for a female. | ||
I think that they should just maybe start Transgender Day and then give them an award then. | ||
Maybe that would be more fair. | ||
I don't know. But when it comes to a sport like boxing and combat sports, you're not, you're literally, you can literally murder somebody. | ||
Like, you literally could kill somebody if you hit them too hard. | ||
And that would be almost like me fighting somebody in a lower weight class or somebody that has very little experience. | ||
I wouldn't do that because I have an actual conscience. | ||
And when I used to spar with guys, one of the biggest things my trainer would say, well, does this guy know how to go light? | ||
Does he know how to work? Meaning, like, if he goes all out, he could literally kill someone. | ||
The fighter. And then when I became a trainer, when I trained women and if they would spar and practice with men, I would always ask the same question. | ||
Does this guy know how to work with the female? | ||
Because obviously you can't hit a female as hard as you would hit a male. | ||
So it's completely bizarre to me and it's just complete common sense that obviously guys are built differently. | ||
They have thicker wrists, their whole bones, they have the whole testosterone, whether or not they take these trans hormones, the testosterone and the muscle memory. | ||
Yeah, they don't do a bone replacement. | ||
They don't do a muscle replacement. | ||
Right. So it's bizarre to me. | ||
It's, you know, I'm pretty, like, okay with... | ||
If you want to say you're transgender, go right ahead. | ||
It's fine. I mean, whatever. No problem. | ||
But when you want to fight women and you have this advantage of being a biological male, I have a real problem with that. | ||
I think it's really, really sadistic, to say the least. | ||
And it's, you know, it's abuse. | ||
It's battery. And I don't understand why people would actually ever want that to happen or to occur. | ||
All right. Let the bone replacement jokes fly. | ||
I realize now we've opened up the jokes for the bone replacement here. | ||
But, you know, I was going to joke around with you, too. | ||
I mean, wow. Talk about such a misogynistic statement to make. | ||
It's just ridiculous. | ||
I wouldn't have imagined that this would become the reality when five years ago... | ||
I debated a UT professor on UT's campus who was arguing with me, a biology professor, arguing with me that there was no difference between men and women. | ||
None! She said there was none! | ||
I'm like, well, this is complete madness. | ||
Now this is what they promote, even though they know it's not true. | ||
They still celebrate Women's Day. | ||
They still have women's sports. They know it's a lie. | ||
I mean, do leftists just lie about everything? | ||
Gender, January 6th, viruses. | ||
I mean, is there anything they don't lie about? | ||
I don't know. There's a word for it, and I wish I knew it because that sounds smart, for a type of distraction technique where I think they use it to distract from the bigger picture. | ||
So they put this person up and give him this award for being a woman. | ||
And my brother, this is what my brother brought my attention to. | ||
He's like, do you think they're messing with us? | ||
Maybe they're just like messing with us. | ||
So we all fixate on this like... | ||
We're like, what the hell? | ||
As they're bombing people or stealing from us, whatever it is, passing crazy laws and distracting us with this crazy agenda and all this stuff that they're doing. | ||
So I don't know. It's just so crazy to me. | ||
No Democrat I know, there's not a living Democrat I know, and I know a lot of them, I live in New York, that thinks that this is okay. | ||
Not one. So I don't understand how this is like the Democrat president's agenda. | ||
I don't understand how, you know, they're letting people get away with this when it comes to competing in sports. | ||
I just don't understand it when there's not a single Democrat | ||
I know or even Biden voter that I know, which there are a lot of my family, | ||
that when I bring this topic up to them, they're completely against men competing against women | ||
in sports and they're against the drag queen story hours and the kids being, a lot of people say | ||
they're being groomed when they're five years old and they're being exposed to drag shows. | ||
They're too young. | ||
So none, no Democrats I know. | ||
And I know a lot of leftists even agree with it. | ||
So I don't know who agrees with it, except the mainstream media telling everybody | ||
that it's okay and this is normal. | ||
unidentified
|
And that is, that's what the mainstream media says. | |
It's an odd phenomenon when things that are not popular get forced on us and lies that nobody believe | ||
become reality or etched into history. | ||
And so there's this one individual, and here's the truth about Dylan Mulvaney, and you guys can just put the B-roll of Click 12 up there. | ||
I don't need the audio, but it's this dude pretending to be a woman, shrieking, making fun of femininity. | ||
Sorry, bro, you can't fake femininity. | ||
It's an energy. But, you know, it's funny because... | ||
It's like, oh, look at this guy pretending to be a woman, and he gets all these followers, and he gets all this attention, and he gets all these sponsorships. | ||
Look, not any girl could just do that. | ||
Just a girl, just being a girl doesn't get followers, doesn't get sponsorships. | ||
The only reason he gets the attention, the only reason he gets the sponsorships is because everybody knows it's a man pretending to be a woman. | ||
Everybody knows that. | ||
The sheer focus on him is the acceptance of that. | ||
Yeah, no, it's crazy. | ||
And I always say, like, if these men got one period, and not to be like TMI, like one PMS, like, you know how women are, you know, it's a thing. | ||
It's a chemical, hormonal thing. | ||
I don't think they'd want to be a woman anymore. | ||
So to say I'm a woman and you've never gotten, like... | ||
A period. You've never went through childbirth. | ||
You've never gone through menopause. | ||
You don't know the emotional ups and downs and swings that women honestly have. | ||
That's what I think, for me, the female experience is all the emotions because of the different chemicals that we have running through our bodies. | ||
And just the female body is just so intricate and it's just so different. | ||
So for men to say that they know what the female experience is, I think if they really knew, they might decide they might want to stick to being a male, possibly, because it's not fun getting your period every month. | ||
Oh, but look at all the attention, though. | ||
Look at all the attention and all the sponsorships and all the money! | ||
It's crazy to me. | ||
I mean, like, you know, I think when someone got a tampon commercial, and I don't understand how that works. | ||
So do you think, though, if Dylan Mulvaney wanted to actually experience what it was like to go through having a period or something like that, do you think, you know, maybe you could volunteer? | ||
Do you think you could punch him as hard as you could in the stomach, like every hour on the hour, and he could? | ||
I'd love to. That would be great. | ||
Yes, I would. I would volunteer. | ||
You would volunteer. If he wanted to experience a female's pain of a period, you would be willing to punch him in the stomach and the gut every hour on there? | ||
Punch him in the stomach, spin him around a few times, punch him again, spin him around so he gets a little nauseous, you know what I mean? | ||
Sure. That's what I would do to him. | ||
And then maybe he'll understand that there's more to being a woman than just putting on lipstick and putting on hair and acting a certain way that society constructed. | ||
What being a woman actually is is so much more than that. | ||
And that's just my opinion. That's my honest opinion. | ||
I thought about it. I'm like, these people really don't know What it feels like to be a female, because it's not what people think that aren't female. | ||
I just put it that way. Like, you don't understand what it feels like to be a female. | ||
And I'm okay with that. | ||
I don't need to. All right? | ||
You guys can keep that to yourself. | ||
Yeah. And, you know, this other thing, too, where it's like, oh, well, you could be tricked. | ||
You know, they look like a female. | ||
No, I'm pretty sure I couldn't be tricked. | ||
Again, like I said, there's a clear energy, not to mention bone structure and other things. | ||
No matter how much you try, I don't think I could be fooled. | ||
And this other debate about, well, you know, what if it was a hot, you know, a hot tranny or something like that? | ||
No, there's no such thing as a 10 tranny. | ||
I'm sorry. It just doesn't exist. | ||
A man pretending to be a woman is not a woman and doesn't get rated as a woman. | ||
It gets a zero because it's not a woman. | ||
So, hey, what do you rate this man on a scale of 1 to 10 as a woman? | ||
A zero because it's not a woman. | ||
You see, Cara Castronova, tell people where they can follow your work. | ||
Follow me on Twitter, Cara Castronova, and get her at Cara Castronova and on the Gateway Pundit and watch me at Newsmax every Saturday night at 10 p.m. | ||
Thank you, Cara. You're awesome. | ||
Happy International Women's Day, by the way. | ||
Alright, we're going to go full commit now to International Women's Day. | ||
And we're only going to take phone calls from women today. | ||
This is a first. Never been done in the history of radio and television. | ||
We're only going to take calls from women. | ||
The beauty of it is, men are eligible too now. | ||
It's the year 2023 after all, so check it off. | ||
I'll give out the phone number in a second. | ||
First though, ladies and gentlemen, You are most likely not getting the right amount of fiber in your diet every day. | ||
And now sadly, this is the case with a lot of vitamins, a lot of minerals, a lot of nutrients. | ||
We're just not getting them in our average diets because the food has been so depleted of the good stuff with the GMOs and the processing and everything else. | ||
So we have the solution. | ||
And that's why we sell supplements. | ||
Now specifically on the issue of are you getting enough fiber The U.S. FDA recommends adults get at least 25 grams of fiber per day. | ||
Now, I'm not saying the FDA is a trustworthy source, but that's a pretty well-known thing. | ||
At least 25 grams of fiber, depending on who you are, that's what you're going to need for proper probiotics, let's say. | ||
The odds are you're not getting 25 grams of fiber today, but just one scoop of prebiotic fiber from Infowars Life delivers 5 grams of fiber from high-quality, fiber-rich ingredients, and that's just one scoop. | ||
So are you concerned you're not getting enough fiber in your diet? | ||
Prebiotic fiber is the solution. | ||
And it increases the good bacteria in your gut while decreasing the bad bacteria. | ||
Other fibers on the market are not organic. | ||
They're bleached and they're modified with all kinds of toxic chemicals to break them down until they have little resemblance to their natural state. | ||
I wouldn't trust any chemically modified bleached white fiber products myself. | ||
And so that's why our fiber is made with all organic natural fiber sources. | ||
And it is the absolute best fiber product available on the market today. | ||
That's what we do. | ||
Highest quality products. | ||
Lowest price. | ||
Prebiotic fiber. Infowarsstore.com. | ||
The organic acacia, fruit, flax fiber, and so much more. | ||
40% off. | ||
Prebiotic fiber right now. | ||
At Infowarsstore.com and it's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
Now, we are taking calls for International Women's Day. | ||
This was proposed to me by a woman, by the way. | ||
She said, you should do a full show and only take calls from women. | ||
And of course, from being in radio, I guess like half my life now, I was like, you know, Radio talk show audiences are male-dominated, especially when it comes to phone calls. | ||
But if anybody could do it, it would be us. | ||
So I thought about it and then I had the perfect out. | ||
Here on International Women's Day, the perfect time for the first time ever to do a only female caller show. | ||
But since it's the year 2023 and the Democrats have the White House, men are women too. | ||
And so if you're a man, you can now call in on International Women's Day on the line exclusively for women. | ||
How about that? See, the men win again. | ||
Man, modern day feminism has taken a weird turn towards the men. | ||
So there it is. | ||
The number, 877-789-2539. | ||
877-789-2539. | ||
Now, I want to get your response. | ||
The unseen footage from January 6th. | ||
Did Tucker Carlson punt the story? | ||
What do you think is going on with that? | ||
Or, if women want to comment on the phenomenon of men... | ||
Winning women's awards now, then the lines are open for you. | ||
877-789-2539. | ||
Can it be done? | ||
Can a female-only caller show be done? | ||
We will find out today. | ||
But since men can be women, maybe it won't be so hard after all. | ||
So for the females out there that want to respond to the unseen January 6 footage, did Tucker Carlson punt the story, was he under pressure, or the phenomenon of men being women, men winning women's awards, and men being the first woman to do this or that. | ||
How do you feel about that, women? | ||
Or men, since men are women too. | ||
We're having fun. It's Democrats. | ||
Now, this... | ||
Look... | ||
Here, let me do this actually first before we show you Chuck Schumer and Elon Musk and what just went down on Twitter. | ||
First, how do you even... | ||
There's no response to this. | ||
We can try to analyze it at a base level. | ||
What is this about? What is this breakdown from Stephen Colbert? | ||
Look, understand. Stephen Colbert is a mouthpiece for the Democrat Party. | ||
It's sad. Stephen Colbert used to make fun of politics, had a funny show, the late night show on Comedy Central, like 20 years ago and whatever it was on Comedy Central. | ||
It was funny. He made fun of politicians. | ||
It was not based left or right. | ||
It was fair game. But now he's just totally sold out, total mouthpiece for the Democrat Party, reads off the Democrat Party propaganda printed for him, put on the teleprompter. | ||
And I just, this breakdown in response to Tucker Carlson just showing you footage. | ||
That's all it is, just showing you raw footage. | ||
Why are they so panicked about it? | ||
You know why. I don't even know how to respond. | ||
I don't even know how to break this down from Stephen Colbert attacking Tucker Carlson on his show last night. | ||
Thanks in large part to the former president. | ||
There's a whole industry of people who make a good living trying to make you think you're insane. | ||
Well, I make a very good living reminding you that you're not. | ||
Now, you'd think. You would think. | ||
You'd think that once the people gaslighting you on a daily basis have been revealed to be liars, say, in multiple text messages in a $1.6 billion court filing by Dominion Voting Systems, they would pump the brakes. | ||
But apparently, some people are just addicted to being dicks. | ||
Case in point, Fox News host and toddler sucking on a dog turd, Tucker Carlson. | ||
Here's what happened. In order to become a speaker, Kevin McCarthy had to make a lot of stupid promises to a lot of awful people like Matt Gaetz. | ||
And one of those promises was to really... | ||
Now, everything he just said is projection. | ||
But you notice how he admits that in the beginning? | ||
He says, I'm here to remind you that you're sane. | ||
I'm here to remind you you're being gaslit. | ||
He's the one gaslighting you. | ||
unidentified
|
He's the one keeping you insane. | |
But everything he says about Tucker Carlson, everything he says about Matt Gaetz is probably true about him. | ||
It's the only way I can figure this out. | ||
But how do you even explain this? | ||
How much longer does this go on? | ||
How much longer do we live in the upside-down world? | ||
This isn't permanent, right? | ||
We're not going to be stuck living in the upside down in the reverse reality forever, right? | ||
I mean, seriously, the people listening to Colbert eventually will wake up and realize they've been deceived, right? | ||
Or is this the alien takeover? | ||
Is this the demonic takeover? | ||
We just haven't recognized it yet, so we don't know how to properly deal with it. | ||
We still think these are humans. | ||
They're not. They're aliens. They're parasites. | ||
Or do they just hate you that much? | ||
Do they just love lying to you that much? | ||
Or have they just completely sold out for money and they don't care about anything else? | ||
I just struggle to even make sense of it. | ||
Now, Chuck Schumer again today complaining about you seeing January 6th footage. | ||
You'd think they'd want you to see all the footage. | ||
No, they only want you to see what they want you to see. | ||
So Chuck Schumer's complaining about the footage again today on Twitter. | ||
Now, Elon Musk replies... | ||
With footage from January 6th. | ||
Now this is from the popular Stephen voiceover where he took the footage from January 6th and put elevator music over it just to show you what a joke their claims are calling it a violent insurrection and all this crap. | ||
And Elon Musk responded to Chuck Schumer saying, would you like me to remove this video? | ||
So, I mean, it's so obvious. | ||
They are the ones censoring. | ||
They are the ones stopping you from getting access to information. | ||
They are the ones lying to you. | ||
They are the ones gaslighting you. | ||
And so the more and more I see and hear from Elon Musk, the more and more I like him. | ||
And look, this is how I look at it. | ||
If somebody is... | ||
Maybe they're on my team. | ||
Maybe they're pretending to be on my team. | ||
But if somebody has intercepted the ball for my team or recovered a fumble for my team or made a sack for my team or scored a touchdown for my team, I'm going to celebrate that. | ||
I'm going to help that. | ||
Now, if they start playing for the other team, then we'll call that out. | ||
But that's not what I'm seeing from Elon Musk, from my view. | ||
But, guys, can we put that on the screen? | ||
I don't know. Maybe I forgot to send it to you. | ||
But anyway, there it is right there. | ||
So here's Chuck Schumer. | ||
Speaker McCarthy has held the gavel for less than three months. | ||
But by sharing the January 6th security footage, so he's mad that you're getting information, he has already done more than any party leader in Congress to enable the spread of Donald Trump's big lie. | ||
No, you're the big liars. | ||
You lied about COVID. You lied about the Wuhan lab. | ||
You lied about the vaccines. | ||
You lied about Trump-Russia collusion. | ||
You lied about Hunter Biden's laptop. | ||
You lied about Joe Biden's health. | ||
You lied about John Federman's health. | ||
You lied about Hillary Clinton's health. | ||
You lied about January 6th. | ||
You lied about the border. | ||
In fact, there's nothing that Democrats say that's true anymore. | ||
They just don't say anything true. | ||
Alright, we are in the third and final hour of the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
It's International Women's Day, and so this is a first, an all-time first. | ||
In the third hour, we're only taking calls from women, and hearing from women today, either on the unreleased, unseen January 6th footage until released by Tucker Carlson, or the issue on International Women's Day of men Now, before we do that, here's one of the all-time great women, and that's Corrine Jean-Pierre. | ||
And she has a tough job to be the spokeswoman for the president who spends most of his time napping on vacation and when he gets petulant, pooping his pants so that he doesn't have to deal with work. | ||
And so the American people are wondering right now. | ||
With major weather disasters in California, by the way, another storm about to hit California, and it's looking bad, folks. | ||
It's looking like it might make a bad situation worse. | ||
The situation in East Palestine, nothing from Joe Biden. | ||
The border situation. | ||
I mean, it's just total disasters left and right. | ||
We got another oil rig on fire today, by the way. | ||
The domestic disasters continue. | ||
And Joe Biden nowhere to be seen. | ||
So the press asked Karine Jean-Pierre, um, hi, where is the president? | ||
unidentified
|
This is the second day in a row where the president hasn't had any public events on his schedule. | |
What's he up to? What is the president up to? | ||
Before this big speech tomorrow? So look, yesterday, I think we read out two hesitate calls that he had with, I believe, with the Oman and also with President Macron. | ||
We read those two calls out. | ||
And so the president is always working, always making sure that he Not even always making sure. | ||
He does have the American people at the top of mind every day. | ||
He is constantly meeting with his senior staff. | ||
And you will see him tomorrow for the big day as we roll out the president's budget. | ||
Oh, the big day. Tomorrow's the big day, is it? | ||
Where's he today, though? But we were asking where he was today. | ||
And you said, oh, maybe he's talking to Omar. | ||
I don't know. He's working, though. | ||
Oh, yeah, I'm sure he's working. | ||
I'm sure he's working. | ||
There are people stranded in Oregon and California right now. | ||
Probably dying right now. | ||
Children even. Can't get food. | ||
Can't get electricity. Snowed in. | ||
Any disaster relief? | ||
No. Even Gavin Newsom left town. | ||
Nothing from Biden. | ||
Not even a comment. Nothing from FEMA. East Palestine, nothing from Biden. | ||
Barely any help at all from the government. | ||
They get just walked over. | ||
I mean, should I go on? | ||
I mean, we got a war raging in Ukraine. | ||
We've got a wide open southern border at the fentanyl desk. | ||
I mean, there's all kinds of things Joe Biden needs to be addressing and working on. | ||
The economic disaster and distress people are in right now. | ||
No, not Joe Biden. | ||
He's too busy to be president, is what Karine Jean-Pierre says. | ||
But, I mean, talk about... | ||
It's just incredible, isn't it? | ||
It always goes back to the same bottom of the barrel, which is, when are liberals, leftist Democrats going to stop being deceived or stop lying to us? | ||
How long do we have to deal with this? | ||
Donald Trump is a president that worked every day. | ||
Donald Trump is a president that sat there in the Oval Office and let the media jackals in there every day. | ||
We knew who Trump was speaking with. | ||
We know who Trump was meeting with. | ||
They had cameras on him every day. | ||
He was speaking to the press every day. | ||
He was doing photo shoots, video presentations. | ||
Every single day, we saw Donald Trump working. | ||
unidentified
|
Every single day. | |
Now, compare that to what you get from Biden. | ||
There is no comparison. | ||
And those same media jackals sitting there and they say, hey, where's Joe Biden? | ||
And they accept that bull crap from Kareem Jean-Pierre. | ||
Oh, I think he's talking to Omar or something. | ||
He'll be here for the big day tomorrow. | ||
What big day? When California gets slammed with this next big storm, they're already in distress because of the historical snowfall. | ||
Now there's another massive storm about to hit California that could bring massive flooding. | ||
Where's Joe Biden? Oh, I don't know. | ||
Maybe he's on a phone call. | ||
Maybe he's eating a Macron. What a joke. | ||
Third and final hour of the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
And we're breaking barriers here today. | ||
And on International Women's Day, we are only taking calls from women. | ||
Your thoughts on how men can now be women, and men can break female records, and men can get credited as the first female to do X, Y, or Z. What's your response to that as a woman? | ||
And the beauty of it is, if you're a man, you can call in too, because men are women in 2023. | ||
Isn't it amazing? But no, we are dedicating the phone lines to our female listeners today. | ||
And we start... | ||
With, how could it be, Karen calling in from Texas, our first caller on the Female Open Lines Day. | ||
Karen in Texas, go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hi, Owen. This is Karen. | |
I just wanted to call and remind you that International Women's Day has its origin in communism, and we definitely shouldn't be celebrating it. | ||
This is some serious, lean-in, Sheryl Sandberg garbage that, you know, when people say, Happy International Women's Day, you know, I meet them with a blank stare, and I'm just like, bah humbug. | ||
This is garbage. You know, though, I'm now eligible for the International Women's Day Award. | ||
I don't know. | ||
I kind of like it now, now that I'm eligible. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, go ahead and accept it, and I'll be there to boo you as you accept it. | |
You would boo me? | ||
unidentified
|
Absolutely, because you're a man taking more things from women, you know? | |
I guess that's exactly what a commie would do, right? | ||
Is a man taking things from women. | ||
Exactly. No, I can't say I'm surprised that International Women's Day is based in communism. | ||
It seems like all the virtue signaling crap is based in communism. | ||
But I mean, aside from that, how offensive, how insulting is it? | ||
In the White House today, they awarded a man with the Woman of the Year Award. | ||
unidentified
|
It's super insulting, and anytime I see that, you know, I'm not going to be celebrating it. | |
When my kids play against other kids and, you know, I have a daughter, and if there's a team that has a boy on it, she's absolutely not going to be playing against them. | ||
You know, there have been a few of the Christian schools actually here in Austin that because there was a boy on the soccer team, they actually changed their whole league and decided not to play against that team and that school. | ||
So this is already becoming an issue for parents? | ||
I mean, are you having this discussion with other parents where it's like, oh, we know there's a boy competing on that team. | ||
We're going to not compete today? | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, absolutely. It's just unfair. | |
Women will lose scholarships. | ||
They're going to lose all kinds of, you know, just in general, we will never win against men. | ||
It's not fair. No, it really isn't fair. | ||
It's insulting, it's offensive, and they act like it's a virtue to do this. | ||
But then you ask them to describe a woman, and now because of their own political correctness that men can be women, they can't even tell you what a woman is! | ||
It's outrageous. Well, Karen, I thank you for getting through to us here on International Women's Day on the female-only phone line. | ||
Have a great day. All right, thank you, Karen. | ||
Let's go to Sharon in Washington. | ||
Sharon, you're on the air. Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, hi, Owen. On National Woman's Day, I just want to say a bunch of malarkey. | |
And I'm, you know, on my deathbed. | ||
I have hospice here. | ||
And I remind myself of Larry Nichols calling in. | ||
And I just wanted to say thanks. | ||
And I just wanted to say, you know, I just believe that people are born awake and the acceptance from birth that I'm a woman. | ||
So I didn't have to, you know, go through the struggles. | ||
And I think being born awake, if you have Christianity and military in your family, like our generation did, everybody's uncle, you know, was in the military. | ||
And now this generation, they can't name anyone in their family in the military or Christianity. | ||
You know, you raise an interesting point, though, actually, Sharon. | ||
Even though most Americans are one, at most, two generations away from military or Christianity in their family, in their house. | ||
unidentified
|
That's right. That's right. | |
And of course, we've seen Christianity demonized. | ||
The military is a bit of a different story, but now they can't... | ||
I mean, recruitment is down. | ||
They can't even fill their ranks anymore. | ||
And we all know why. | ||
People are too smart to go fight for wars that really don't help the American people anymore. | ||
And they don't want to go be subjected to a bunch of communist propaganda just because they want to show their commitment to America by joining the military. | ||
unidentified
|
That's right. They're signing up now for a job. | |
And they can have a criminal record and be any gender where before people signed up to protect this country under the Constitution. | ||
So I just wanted to say, you just make my day. | ||
I just love your sense of humor. | ||
It's like George Carlin and Alex and my friends have been downloading your shows for 15 years. | ||
And what's helped me during this time is I look at verse of the day, look it up, and, you know, they don't celebrate National Woman's Day. | ||
They might have it somewhere, but the verse of the day is, The Lord will keep you from all harm. | ||
He will watch over your life. | ||
The Lord will watch over your coming and going both now and forevermore. | ||
Psalms 121, 7 through 8. | ||
Well, Sharon, it means everything, your kind words expressed today, and I'm glad that you choose to spend your time with us. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, and I wrote my own obituary, and it says, you know, I'm going out with the spunk of life, which is part of me, and my marketing ideas, quick, are... | |
I have a license plate holder, and years ago I put in the black letters, it says InfoWars, Planet, Watchdog, and... | ||
And another marketing idea is to make a calendar of all these great events and My friend said, yeah, they could put Alex and Owen on there with no shirt. | ||
And I said, no. | ||
That's gross. | ||
Well, you know, I will tell you, you've got some good ideas. | ||
We've been in a very precarious situation here with lawsuits and stuff to kind of expand products and sell different products. | ||
We're hoping to kind of get through that process. | ||
That awkward period and maybe introduce some new t-shirts and maybe like you said, I think a license plate holder is a great idea too or stuff of that nature. | ||
So hopefully we're going to get through some of this, some of the stuff we're dealing with and kind of do the stuff like people are used to, selling the shirts and other types of apparel that we've kind of been a little handcuffed on here lately. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, God bless you and your crew and let's hear from another woman. | |
All right. Thank you, Sharon. | ||
That was wonderful. Wow. | ||
That's a highlight. | ||
That's a highlighter. That's a highlight right there for a show host. | ||
All right, let's go to Angelina in Texas. | ||
Angelina, you are on the InfoWars War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Thanks, Owen. | |
Thank you for having me on the air. | ||
Now, I've been an advocate for people with disabilities of all ages since 2003. | ||
And the subject I want to talk about is that the most protected predator class, and I'm talking about children, are the ones that are employed in special education. | ||
Now, to bring a bigger story on here, for years, Greg Brugan on the Houston Fox Channel And there has been other major headlines where special education children, especially very young, were horribly abused and also horribly raped to where they would need to be having surgical procedures. | ||
And these people are crime victims, and I have known some of them. | ||
And every single time, none of these people ever see prosecution. | ||
And there's a reason for that. | ||
So the first thing to go along with it, preventing to be in prosecution, is that these full-district law firms, they're very highly skilled, and they will do anything and everything to keep this away from the district attorney. | ||
Now, the first thing people would try to do is go through IDEA. And I really don't want to go through those illegal taguments. | ||
It's an administrative procedure by TEA. And after that, you can go on the federal court. | ||
But usually what these attorneys do is they have a whole bunch of things in their plans, which I had more time. | ||
Well, I'm out of time right now, but hold that thought. | ||
All right, we had a caller we held over from the last segment. | ||
That's Angelina in Texas. | ||
She was getting into the issues she sees in special education when it comes to... | ||
Potential child abusers. | ||
Angelina, you were just explaining the protections when this happens that you've witnessed. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Sure, sure. | |
The school district lawyers, they will do anything and everything to protect the school from any form of liability. | ||
And so if your child is hurt or suspected to have been hurt or has been molested, the parents usually get a whole firestorm loaded at them, including one of their favorite weapons is to make these calls to CPS. Okay? | ||
And even if they raise a question about their children in school, And they try to assert their rights. | ||
That is a very common ploy that they do. | ||
And that's the first one. | ||
When you go through IDEA, they're not really going to the criminal courts or anything like that. | ||
And what IDEA does, what these attorneys do perhaps, is that they try to have parents sign a settlement agreement, which includes a release of all claims. | ||
and that means claims in every venue including the criminal venue and in federal courts and uh you can't bring that claim up again if that child happens to get hurt again so they say now um okay now it goes even further uh when it comes up to the federal circuit and i'm talking about this circuit uh we had there has been a number of high profile cases One's from San Antonio and I think one or two from Houston and there were some earlier ones and the fifth circuit had this attitude when it comes to abuse it could be physical abuse or rape and the attitude is that if this starts off as a disciplinary action like you know discipline and it ends up and it ends up in abuse or as rape they still considered it As a pedagogical act. | ||
Not all the justices in the Fifth Circuit, but there were a few of them. | ||
And there was even one from Houston ISD, which a special education girl was repeatedly raped by a security officer, and the Fifth Circuit let him off. | ||
And they also added that he wasn't going to be on the Well, you know, it's amazing how you see the protection of this activity, whether it's what you're talking about or this drag queen stripper time for kids that is becoming more prevalent. | ||
But man, you know, Angelina, I thank you for bringing this information up. | ||
Sounds like you could do a whole dissertation, a special news report with this information. | ||
I mean, what a delicate situation, you know? | ||
I mean, I don't have kids and... | ||
I can only imagine. But, I mean, what a delicate situation. | ||
You're taking your kid, especially if it's a special needs kid, and you're dropping them off at school every day. | ||
And it's like, if you don't have full faith in the school system, if you don't have full faith in the staff, I just can't imagine the nerves. | ||
And, I mean, the more I hear about this stuff, the more I see. | ||
Granted, I didn't go to school in the modern day, so it wasn't nearly as bad. | ||
But the more I see, the more I'm grateful for the education that I got growing up. | ||
The more blessed I realize and lucky I realize I was because I didn't have to deal with this crap. | ||
And my parents didn't have to worry about the educators that they were sending me to school with. | ||
So, I mean, just wow. | ||
Oh, that's heartbreaking stuff. | ||
All right, Angelina, thank you. Let's go to MrsDigital. | ||
In Wisconsin, Mrs. | ||
Digital, go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hi, Owen. What a pleasure and honor. | |
And I first want to pray for your previous caller, Sharon, the caller before the last one, that the Lord would heal her and protect her and just restore her strength and give her, you know, the strength of an eagle flying above mountains. | ||
She sounded strong. She sounded great calling in. | ||
unidentified
|
She did. She sounded awesome. | |
And my main point of why I'm calling in, I'm Mrs. | ||
Digital, and my husband is Digital Dave, and he's sent an email to you guys at the tips line. | ||
There's a very important letter that needs to be addressed, and it's in the vein of Esther, Queen Esther. | ||
She was up against a world war, and all of her people were going to be killed, massacred by Haman. | ||
He was plotting to kill and murder everybody. | ||
And, you know, Alex Jones has written about it in the Great Reset, the war for the world. | ||
It's ongoing, and we have to defend ourselves. | ||
And no one else is coming to rescue us. | ||
We have to rescue each other. | ||
And it's by the power of the Lord Jesus Christ that we're going to be able to do it. | ||
And by no other means can we do it. | ||
And I wrote a letter that the Lord commanded me to write. | ||
And today is the last day of Purim. | ||
In Jerusalem, it's Adar 15. | ||
And then, um, Adar 15, just read Esther 3, 13. | ||
May I read that? Yeah, you got it in front of you. | ||
Go ahead. Oh, yes. | ||
Letters were sent by couriers to all the king's provinces to destroy, to kill, and to analyte all the Jews. | ||
Put your own name in there. If you're a Christian, Jew, whatever. | ||
Hindu, doesn't matter. Muslim, doesn't matter. | ||
Both young and old, women and children, in one day, the 13th day of the 12th month, which is the month of Adar. | ||
That was March 7th, 473 BC. And to seize their belongings as plunder. | ||
That's what they want to do. They want to steal our houses and you'll be happy. | ||
No, we won't be happy. | ||
We want freedom. | ||
No matter what nation we live in, we want to be free. | ||
Yeah, we want prosperity. | ||
We want privacy. We want ownership. | ||
We want property. Yes. | ||
unidentified
|
And, you know, Jesus is not a socialist Jesus. | |
Jesus is a capitalist Jesus. | ||
Jesus knows that if you own something, you'll be responsible and you take care of it. | ||
To whom much is given, much is required. | ||
It's a capitalistic principle to be free, to have ownership. | ||
To be responsible, to be loving, to be kind, to be generous to our neighbor. | ||
To those who have two goats, give one away. | ||
If you see someone who's hungry, feed them. | ||
If you see somebody who's thirsty, give them water. | ||
We're being destroyed and the only rescuers we have are ourselves because the Holy Spirit lives in us. | ||
The Holy Spirit lives inside of us. | ||
I wrote a letter that Jesus commanded me to write. | ||
To my brothers and sisters all around the world, I'm nobody. | ||
I'm nobody. But he said, if you must break a sister, everyone's going to die. | ||
And your producers have it on their tip email. | ||
If you can go to my sub stack, it's just turtle dove dot sub stack or my name. | ||
I'm Mrs. Digital. | ||
I'm also Michelle Catherine Orr dot sub stack dot prominence for the glory of God alone. | ||
I take no credit. | ||
But we have to stand up and fight for our very lives, our children's lives, the unborn | ||
lives. | ||
We have to do it now. | ||
And God bless all of you. | ||
I love you all so much. | ||
Wow. | ||
All right. | ||
Mrs. Digital. | ||
Thank you for that call. | ||
It's definitely Female Caller Day today. | ||
It's, you know, we're hitting that nerve. | ||
And, you know, I don't really know how to properly say this. | ||
I'd have to spend a whole segment. | ||
But... It's why this whole thing of, oh, men can be women. | ||
Look, I'm wearing a dress. Look, I'm putting on makeup. | ||
Man, let me just tell you. | ||
If you don't understand the power of feminine energy, like... | ||
It's like, I don't even... | ||
It's like, I can't even explain... | ||
Like, if you don't understand the power of femininity and a woman's energy and a woman's love or a woman's scorn, it's just... | ||
To think a man can have that, you're just delusional, man. | ||
You're just delusional. You know, there are a bunch of laws that are getting passed against the transgender bullcrap. | ||
And I mean, look, you can have a real debate about this. | ||
Let's just be honest about the situation. | ||
Let's not pretend men are women. | ||
If men want to pretend to be women, they're still men. | ||
But okay, let's have a debate here. | ||
In Arkansas, the Senate just passed a bill that could jail adults up to 30 days for going to the bathroom. | ||
Well, this is there. | ||
If a man goes into the female bathroom and there's a kid in there is when the charges would come down. | ||
And so really, look, if I walked into a woman's locker room or if I walked into a woman's bathroom right now, I'd probably get charged. | ||
And so I don't think it has to be this complicated. | ||
Now, if you want to write laws specifically targeting transgender individuals because you think they're more prone to perverted or sexual abuse activity, I suppose that's the argument that could be made here. | ||
But it shouldn't be that difficult. What is the punishment if a man goes into a female locker room? | ||
What is the punishment if a man goes into the women's bathroom? | ||
That's all it is. Whatever the punishment for that is, that should be the punishment. | ||
But I guess they're trying to really crack down on this activity because of the... | ||
Minor aspect involved in this. | ||
And so, you know, it's going to be interesting to see how this goes as far as laws that get passed, but this is the right thing to do. | ||
And it's not that conservatives or Republicans want to target transgender people. | ||
It's that we're trying to not allow this transgender, whatever, LGBTQ identity to become a disguise or to become an opportunity for perverts, child abusers, sexual abusers to get an opportunity to abuse. | ||
I mean, that's really what this is about. | ||
And so I think, yeah, there should be a debate. | ||
If you really want to do this thing and you're going to normalize men pretending to be a woman, then yeah, we're going to have to respond to this absurdity and we're going to have to rewrite laws and crap because this is something that doesn't exist. | ||
But let's go back to the phone lines here on International Women's Day. | ||
And you're hearing from the women. | ||
What? What checkbox will we get next from our female callers? | ||
We've had it all so far. | ||
And now we go to Olivia in Idaho. | ||
Olivia, you're on the InfoWars War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Hey, Owen. | |
It's great to talk with you. | ||
If I could, really quick, I'd just like to plug vasobeat. | ||
I used to get horrific migraines from taking hormonal birth control. | ||
And I would take Bazobeat twice a day and it actually would help my migraines. | ||
Sometimes they would completely dissipate. | ||
So Bazobeat really works. | ||
I know you guys say blood flow, blood flow, blood flow. | ||
So thank you so much for that. | ||
By the way, VasoBeat Complete back in stock. | ||
It was out of stock. It's back in stock, 25% off. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, I actually did just see that on the InfoWars store. | |
And then one other thing I'd like to plug real quick is the bone broth. | ||
I actually had a terrible case of the neurovirus in the last week of February. | ||
So I had pretty severe gastrointestinal distress. | ||
And I took the bone broth every morning, and it actually helped my gut, like, immensely. | ||
And that, plus some raw milk every day, I'm, like, back to normal, and it's fantastic. | ||
So bone broth and Vazabit, they're really, really good. | ||
Well, thank you for that. | ||
Thank you for letting people know how great the products have been for you. | ||
And there you go, bone broth also in stock, 25% off. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you for that, Olivia. Yeah, absolutely. | |
And I realized when I called in, I thought we were supposed to talk about the January 6th tapes, but I'd actually rather talk about men competing in women's sports because I was an athlete in college. | ||
And I played C3 volleyball, so I'm not saying I was at the highest tier or anything like that. | ||
But I guess I just kind of, going off of the last caller's sentiment, it's like no one is here to save you, and so I don't understand why Um, these women competing in, especially, NCAA sports, like, don't stand up. | ||
I mean, I have to imagine there's more people on your team that are feeling the same way as you are. | ||
And, like, I know women oftentimes feel comfortable with strength in numbers, so it's kind of like, you guys need to stand up and speak out. | ||
From my personal experience, the women I competed with and competed against, there is no way they would let this kind of thing stand. | ||
You don't need to age yourself on the show, but you probably competed before this was even a potential. | ||
Yes. So, you know, and here's what's so odd about it, because I think you're right, but the phenomenon is the same phenomenon to everything else. | ||
People are not going to respond until it gets to their front door. | ||
And so what have you seen? | ||
You have seen some women that are involved in TRAC We're good to go. | ||
Until it starts to get into all the sports, like a volleyball, like you played volleyball. | ||
NCAA volleyball is a very serious thing. | ||
The NCAA volleyball tournament, females take that very seriously. | ||
Same thing with basketball. | ||
I think once it gets into those sports and more of the female athletes are dealing with it, then maybe they'll have that moment of pushing back. | ||
But, I mean, you get betrayed. | ||
You get betrayed by people like Megan Rapinoe who promote this crap. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, and that's I think the thing that's the most confusing because I know a lot of people who maybe aren't athletes are saying like, oh, you just play sports to have fun. | |
But like, if you're a serious athlete, you're literally competing. | ||
And the point of competing is to win. | ||
Like, that's all it really comes down to. | ||
And if you have a man with women, it's never, never going to be a fair competition. | ||
It's not going to be a level playing field. | ||
I mean, it's ludicrous that we even have to explain this. | ||
We used to understand this by, what, kindergarten, first grade? | ||
unidentified
|
I think so. | |
At least I did. | ||
You know, I can't speak for everybody now. | ||
Yeah, no, I mean, well, I remember just from growing up playing soccer that before you got into kindergarten, whatever they called those soccer teams, like the little munchkin soccer teams, you'd have girls and boys on the same field just because it's little munchkin soccer, just run around, hive ball. | ||
And then same thing with kindergarten. | ||
And then I remember by first grade is when they separated the teams. | ||
But every once in a while, like in my team's case, I remember we had a girl on our team that was an incredible soccer player. | ||
She ended up playing four years in college, winning a bunch of awards at the college she played at. | ||
And she actually played with the boys, I think maybe until first or second grade. | ||
But even her, like the best girl player anywhere in the city, she couldn't compete with boys as soon as it got second, third, fourth grade. | ||
So, I mean, it's like... It's just ridiculous to pretend that men and women are the same or that it's an equal playing field. | ||
So how bad do you think it has to get, Olivia? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, gosh. Well, with you talking specifically about volleyball, I can only imagine just a man out on the court. | |
You know, women volleyball players who wear spandex or some I see nowadays are wearing leggings. | ||
And I just can't get this horrific image. | ||
Out of my head of the man on the court with like everything down there. | ||
Oh my gosh. Yeah, yeah, yeah. | ||
For those that don't know... | ||
For those that don't know, the female volleyball uniform is typically basically spandex shorts, you know. | ||
So you're getting a pretty good idea of what's going on down there. | ||
And if it's a bulge, you're going to get a nice package. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, man. I don't even know. | |
How could you even fit in that? | ||
I don't even know how you could put those. | ||
I guess I could. I mean, I used to do play-by-play for college volleyball when I was younger. | ||
I enjoyed the view. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm not going to lie. Well, you know, a lot of people say that the volleyball players have the next butt. | |
And I tend to think it's true. | ||
I just like the sport. | ||
I mean, I like the view of the game. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, I guess. | |
Of course. But, I mean, seriously, like you're saying, if it was a dude out there, it'd be a little obvious, like, what in the heck is going on? | ||
But that happened, too. | ||
There was a dude playing with women, spiked the ball. | ||
It was either, I think it was high school, spiked the ball, broke a girl's nose. | ||
Did you hear that? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. I did, and actually, so I'm also from St. | |
Louis, and I played with a girl who ended up going and playing at Wash U, and I saw her hit a ball and hit someone in the head and gave them a concussion. | ||
So I've seen that happen before. | ||
It's not that uncommon, but yes, it is. | ||
Well, it'll be a lot more common. | ||
unidentified
|
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm here today to apologize. | |
Why did you say ladies first? | ||
unidentified
|
That's sexist. It's just a standard greeting. | |
Let me start over. Gentlemen and ladies... | ||
Who says the man? | ||
Okay, sorry. Humans in the audience. | ||
I identify as a basketball. | ||
Humans and basketballs. | ||
I'm a parrot who mimics words but doesn't comprehend them. | ||
unidentified
|
Humans, basketballs, talking parrots, and whatever else is out there. | |
Whatever? It's whoever. | ||
unidentified
|
Actually, it's whomever. | |
No one likes you, Mary. | ||
unidentified
|
Alright, alright, just calm down, okay? | |
Now you're tone policing us! | ||
Alright, I don't know when that aired from Family Guy, but it was sent to me and I had a good laugh at it, so I wanted to share it here with you. | ||
Final segment of the InfoWars War Room brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
By the way, just an update on the domestic disasters. | ||
Oil rig fire. I think that was in Alabama. | ||
And we also had a train derailment with injuries in West Virginia. | ||
Look out on the West Coast. | ||
Massive storm about to hit California of making a bad situation even worse. | ||
Executive who served in Clinton and Obama administrations killed by turbulence on jet over New England. | ||
Well, I'm sure one of these deaths, if not all of them, are legit, right? | ||
All these Clinton friends. Nothing to see there. | ||
Nothing to see there. | ||
I'm sure. But we want to go back to the phone lines here on International Women's Day. | ||
And we've taken nothing but calls from women. | ||
They said it couldn't be done. | ||
We've defied the laws of live media again. | ||
Let's go to Candice in Nashville. | ||
Candice, you're on the InfoWars War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. Hey, Owen. | |
Hey, I just wanted to talk about the hidden or the recordings from January 6th. | ||
Those were made with our tax money. | ||
Those belong to us. | ||
Ashley Babbitt was a human sacrifice that day. | ||
I mean, she got murdered there. | ||
And Tucker Carlson said that there was no video of that, but we saw video Of Ashley Babbitt being killed. | ||
No, I don't believe that there's no video of it. | ||
I highly doubt there's not some sort of security tape of that moment, if not multiple angles, I would guess, at least two angles from each side of that door. | ||
I'm not talking about reporters. | ||
I'm talking about like what we have on the screen now. | ||
I'm talking about surveillance video. | ||
Oh, exactly. And they have the surveillance video of the other people dying that day at the hands of police. | ||
unidentified
|
Exactly. And they're withholding all of those snuff films to try to control the narrative. | |
So just imagine that could be anybody's mom, sister, brother, anybody. | ||
And they're watching them die. | ||
And then to control the narrative and keep people locked up as political prisoners, they're withholding. | ||
That's taxpayer recordings. | ||
And they're trying to withhold information to use against other people in some kind of a weird blackmail. | ||
I say we use it all against them and outsmart them with all this. | ||
I saw what had happened before, you know, was gonna happen. | ||
And I thought, you know, this is really bad. | ||
This is like Hunger Games. | ||
Remember when they were taking the kids to the Capitol and it was all a setup? | ||
Yeah. On Hunger Games? | ||
It's been a while since I've seen the movie. | ||
Was that when they, like, flooded that area? | ||
unidentified
|
It's whenever they said, bring the kids to the Capitol, bring the children to the Capitol, and then they started bombing the kids, and she watched her little sister get murdered by the government. | |
It's been a while since I've seen the films, but it feels more and more like The Hunger Games every day. | ||
Well, look, we know why they're panicked about the footage coming out, because they know it proves they're total liars and totally evil. | ||
unidentified
|
Right, and Owen, did you say that the man that Tucker Carlson actually interviewed was the same man that arrested you? | |
Yeah, and you know, okay, you bring that up, and I had the crew pull the video. | ||
I couldn't believe it, actually. | ||
The crew, I usually have a very sharp and keen eye. | ||
I didn't catch this one. | ||
The crew caught this one. | ||
It was indeed the officer interviewed by Tucker Carlson was the officer that... | ||
He arrested me here in the video. | ||
There you can see him in that video. | ||
And I've talked about this before. | ||
And look, I don't like getting into my legal stuff right now. | ||
I'm still going through it. But I will tell you... | ||
And I don't remember if it was that police officer or somebody else. | ||
But when I went to the Capitol that day, I was told by Capitol Police the Democrats want me arrested. | ||
And if I go into the Capitol, there's going to be a call from the Democrats to the Capitol Police to have me arrested. | ||
And I didn't break any laws. | ||
There was no probation that I couldn't go into the Capitol or anything like that. | ||
They just had the call. | ||
I was on a list. Probably Jerry Nadler. | ||
And they said, if you see Owen Schroyer, arrest him on site. | ||
And they didn't want to. | ||
They were telling me, don't go in there. | ||
We'll have to arrest you. Don't go in there. | ||
Even when they said they were going to arrest me, they're like, please, just leave right now. | ||
I was like, no, I have the right to stand in my Capitol, and so ultimately they arrested me. | ||
But yes, the Capitol police officer that arrested me was the same one that was interviewed by Tucker Carlson. | ||
unidentified
|
You're 100% right. Right, and Owen, and I'm a whistleblower in all of this also. | |
People can find me at Queen of the Juicy on Twitter, Candace K. Morris on Facebook. | ||
I've been actually apparently an enemy of the state. | ||
I didn't know why because I was just a mind control slave of the state for years and years and years. | ||
So it was very concerning to find out that they considered me a terrorist or some kind of, you know, Well, that's it, exactly. | ||
That's it, exactly. You're a free-thinking American, so, you know, you've got to be tracked and traced. | ||
And now they've got their excuse. That's why the January 6th thing is so important. | ||
That's their excuse to spy, track, trace, demonize, and arrest, imprison, or disappear any opposition to the regime. | ||
That's what it's all about. That's why they're so protective over that footage. | ||
It's so important to them to have this big lie in their political persecution. | ||
Candace, thank you for the call. | ||
Let's go to Stephanie, FEMA Region 4. | ||
Stephanie, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. Hi, Owen. | ||
unidentified
|
Thanks for taking my call. | |
I just want to say that I was here on January 6th by the Washington Monument, and I saw a group of younger, early 20s kids in tactical gear. | ||
And I saw a man with, you know, white hair, but he looked like he was in his 40s, like too young to have white hair. | ||
Kind of shaggy. But anyways, when we went to the Capitol, I got stuck on the steps because I was helping carry the American flag that was falling on my way there. | ||
I don't even know those people. | ||
But anyways, we also had provocateurs pushing from the back, you know, trying to get us to go into the Capitol to go on the steps. | ||
But I was going to say... | ||
I managed to get out of, you know, that crowded area because we were packed like sardines. | ||
And when I went and I saw on the news, that man with shaggy hair, like I think he was an ABC reporter, was interviewing him inside the Capitol. | ||
So I'm pretty sure journalists We're in on, you know, as well as the feds. | ||
Well, yeah, I mean, Nancy Pelosi had a documentary film crew ready to go. | ||
And I'm not saying they all knew. | ||
I'm not saying they all knew the agenda, but definitely some were let in the know about what they were going to pull that day. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's crazy. | |
I haven't updated my phone since then. | ||
I've deleted my social media because, you know, We could end up in a D.C. gulag just for, you know, being in the wrong place. | ||
Yeah, and look, I gotta say, too, you know, whatever pushback the Republicans in the House are gonna have towards that corrupt January 6th committee, it better happen fast because they're gonna try to get as many other arrests or as much other oppression done They're hitting the accelerator now, and so justice needs to be served here. | ||
Release all the tapes, give it to the defendants, let the judges see it, let the judges know that they withheld this evidence, and let's finally maybe right this horrific wrong, specifically for those that have been rotting in jail cells unjustly. | ||
Stephanie, thank you for the call. All right, let's go to our final caller. | ||
I'm sorry to the men that called in today trying to steal the platform from women, but that's woke in 2023. | ||
But no, we took all calls from women. | ||
And our final, Stoney Wolf in Michigan, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. Hi. | ||
unidentified
|
Last time I talked to you, God damn it, I was gonna try to put this in perspective. | |
Well, God darn it. | ||
God darn it. | ||
Darn it. | ||
Bye. | ||
Thank you. | ||
I lost him. | ||
He took the shot. | ||
And last time I talked to you, he had blood clots in his lungs. | ||
Oh God, I hate this whole thing. | ||
And he died Sunday. | ||
Okay, but wait, I'm going to just try to snap out of this now because I'm really pissed. | ||
But I want to also tell you about your MadMaxWorld.TV. I tried to punch it in here on DuckDuckGo on my Google, and it comes up with a website access prohibited. | ||
Okay, so I want to warn you about that. | ||
I'm trying not to break down, man, but it's been a tough week. | ||
You know what? I hear you. | ||
And let me just tell you, and I've said this a couple times, and I personally haven't had to deal with this from the angle of friends or family dying from the vaccine, but I've had friends and family that took it that have had serious side effects and I just, I just, there's so many innocent people that just had no idea what was going on. | ||
They bought the propaganda and just innocent people that took that vaccine undeservedly, your husband included. | ||
May he rest in peace. | ||
God bless you, Stony Wolf. | ||
It's been said many times that trials and tribulations, if you don't give up, will only make you stronger, will make you more versatile, will make you more competitive. | ||
And that has certainly happened in the last couple of years with supply chain breakdowns and other issues. | ||
So, after a year plus of contacting organizations and traveling around the nation and going to top trade shows, we have made connections with two of the very top quality suppliers of nutraceutical grade supplements in the nation. | ||
And so many of the best selling, top rated, top brands in the United States and around the world are supplied by these two companies. | ||
And the first big line we're rolling out is InfoWars MD. Every one of these 10 new products is the highest grade in the United States. | ||
The cleanest, the best, the freshest. | ||
It's insane. Take the new turmeric formula. | ||
It's called Turmeric 95. | ||
Just like bodies, it's the same turmeric 95% cuminoid extract that was in bodies from the very same producer of it. | ||
We've just cut out the middleman so we can lower the price some. | ||
Think about that, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
And it's the same for all of these products. | ||
But many of these products are things never before available at InfoWorksStore.com. | ||
Like... The full spectrum CBD oil. | ||
Doesn't have THC in it, doesn't get you high, but has all the good parts of the oils in the hemp plant that are so well documented for your brain, your cardiovascular, your joints, everything. | ||
I went to a doctor two years ago, had a checkup, had a full physical done, and they prescribed me CBD oil. | ||
Not that it was a prescription, they just prescribed that I go out and get CBD oil. | ||
And guess what? I discovered the CBD oil that they told me to get came from this company. | ||
So ladies and gentlemen, InfoWarsMD is 10 new products. |