Owen Shroyer and Andrew Napolitano expose how The Daily Wire’s contract with Steven Crowder could force conservative media into self-censorship, while Dr. Andrew Huff details severe mRNA vaccine side effects—myocarditis, atrial fibrillation—after two Moderna doses, despite prior immunity. They link redacted Pfizer reports, whistleblower claims like Brooke Jackson, and suppressed research to systemic corruption by Big Pharma and intelligence agencies, questioning whether vaccines worsen infection risks or drive variants. Shroyer pivots to Ukraine, accusing Biden and Lindsey Graham of illegal war-mongering while ignoring domestic scandals, before critiquing leftist climate groups and sports hypocrisy. Alex Jones escalates warnings about "biomedical tyranny," framing World ID and cashless systems as tools for totalitarian control, with vaccines labeled "poison shots" causing mass harm—arguing resistance is the only path to freedom. [Automatically generated summary]
Judge Andrew Napolitano is with us for the first 30 minutes of the transmission.
We're just talking during the break and we're talking about internet censorship.
And actually, that was the first question I wanted to ask you.
You've been around media for a long time, television, radio, everything, and you're doing a lot of work on a YouTube channel right now.
You're expanding the content that you're creating.
How are you adjusting to the new media era where you've got to be on the internet, TV is no longer the dominant platform, but also you've got to work around all the censorship.
Maybe not something that people had to think about before.
Censorship. I mean, I'm unfamiliar with the concept of censorship, but it happens.
I mean, I make a very simple argument like...
Stuart Rhodes should not have been prosecuted for sedition because you shouldn't be prosecuted for a conspiracy to do something that's impossible to do.
How could five people overthrow the government of the United States?
That is a valid, legitimate argument, which his own lawyers made in the courtroom.
The judge rejected the argument.
Okay, I understand that. When I said that on air, TikTok banned me for two weeks.
When I call abortion homicide, TikTok bans me.
So I am just unfamiliar with the concept of being banned, but you have to live with it.
I don't change what I say because, like you, I have a solid core, a base of libertarians that want to hear from me every day.
My product is called Judging Freedom.
My interviews, as you know, are 25 to 30 minutes.
Doug McGregor, superstar with my people.
Scott Ritter, superstar with my people.
I even have an ex-CIA guy on, Jack Devine, who my people love to hate, but the numbers go up when Jack is on.
The other model is just me looking at the camera, explaining some I'll give you an example.
The day after the FBI served the search warrant on Trump's house, Bill O'Reilly's going to kill me for what I'm about to say.
The day after, at 9 o'clock in the morning, I get in front of my camera and I explain for 15 minutes what happened.
How does the search warrant work?
How did the FBI get there?
How does the judge get the authority to do it?
Bill O'Reilly did the same thing at the same time from his...
Home studio. Bill had 400,000 views.
I had a million four.
So it's great when people want to understand something as complicated as law enforcement and the Constitution.
It's also great because I can just walk from my kitchen into the room where my studio is and just start talking.
On the other hand, I'm at the mercy of YouTube and TikTok and all those people who hate what we say.
Well, that's the fear they have, is that one individual...
Can walk, like you said, from his kitchen to a studio at his house.
Doesn't even have to be a studio. He can put a cell phone up with a tripod and go live.
And while there's news breaking, I think that that...
To me, that was the biggest angle of the censorship.
And I notice they always go after the people that do live broadcasts when there's breaking news first because it's all about that first 24 hours and controlling the narrative, right?
It's all about what are you going to see as the news is breaking?
And so they want full control over that with...
Whether it's CNN or MSNBC or ABC, NBC, but when all of a sudden there's a different narrative out there, people start to think.
So I was at Fox for 24 years, and in the 24 years they put me in front of a camera.
Ready for this number?
14,500 times.
If I said something management didn't like, I got slapped on the wrist.
Yeah, when I accused the Obama administration of being in cahoots with the British spies and spying on candidate Trump, they took me off air for about 10 days.
Though you were proven right. It wasn't a big deal.
But I was never sanctioned.
I was never stopped.
From speaking in a permanent or long-standing period of time because somebody didn't like what I said.
My job there and my role today is to defend the Constitution, to defend human liberty, and to make people think about the role of government in our lives today and how dangerous that's become.
I was thinking we're going to go into the Biden documents.
I asked him about his new show, which, by the way, since I think we're probably going to be short on time, he's got a couple segments left with us.
I'm telling you, folks, if you want the best coverage, if you think my coverage is good on Ukraine, I get a lot of my information from Judge Napolitano's interviews with Colonel McGregor.
So that's like the best place right now on the internet to get news, and you always do great interviews.
But now I see we're going to get into this Crowder situation.
The contract of which you speak, and I haven't seen it and you haven't seen it, but we've seen these comments about it, apparently said that if Crowder is demonetized, that is taken off the air, if his audience goes down while he's working for Ben Shapiro, a brilliant and gifted young man who's been fabulously successful in creating his own media company, Then Crowder owes back the money that Ben and his company are obligated to pay.
And Crowder apparently exploded at that.
This is a contract that wasn't signed, as I understand it, but a contract that they were in the midst of negotiating.
Ben says it's standard.
Crowder says, I'm not going to pay money back to anybody because I get demonetized and deplatformed all the time.
Now, when I told you the story about TikTok demonetizing me, I didn't lose money.
I guess I lost money by TikTok not paying me as much, but I didn't have a contract with anybody that says if TikTok deplatforms you, you owe us the amount of money that you would have made had they not deplatformed you.
That's where this mess is.
They are both admirable people who express ideas.
Ben, of course, has got the whole company.
Crowder has him himself.
They express ideas that the public wants to hear.
I wish they weren't in a pissing contest at each other.
Well, and, you know, part of that, I think, is, look, Stephen Crowder is successful because he is a showman.
He does a good show, and there's no doubt.
I mean, he bought the little walkie-talkie thing to do the recording on for a bit, which he did back in December, and maybe he really didn't want to release this, and maybe he wanted to have good negotiations and it didn't go his way.
But, again, my issue is if this—and here's the real question— If this is the standard contract, and I don't know if this is what the Daily Wire offers all its people or, say, Turning Point USA or other stuff.
At least I've never heard about that.
Crowder's the first person making any buzz about it.
Well, that's the purpose of our conversation, because these two people both perform a positive service for those who don't like big tech and who don't like the mainstream media.
They should not be pissing at each other.
They should be working together.
Or either... Either together or in a complimentary way.
And full disclosure here, too, I don't know Ben Shapiro.
I have met Crowder and Candace Owens, who's inserted herself into this as well.
And I like both of them. They both are good people.
They were nice to me. I've done content with them.
So I don't have a dog in this fight as far as any friendship or loyalties are concerned.
I think the issue comes down to this.
If this is the standard contract, let's say the next 50 big conservative influencers down the road have to sign a similar contract to this, and now they're essentially beholden to YouTube and whoever it is, Facebook or TikTok.
And I think that's Crowder's point, is he's saying, I'm in a situation where I either have to self-censor or I'm going to, why would I sign this contract?
Had it been signed and had Crowder been deplatformed and had Shapiro's company deducted money from Stephen's account, would the courts have upheld that?
Answer, yes. Because we still have, believe it or not.
We still have freedom of contract in this country.
And unless the contract is profoundly against public policy, which this one is not, the courts are going to enforce it.
Crowder, to his credit, discovered all this before they signed it.
It hasn't been signed. It's too bad.
I mean, he would have been, I think, even bigger than he is now had he gone on Ben's platforms.
So I depend on YouTube, Facebook, and to the least extent, TikTok.
But we will soon be going behind a paywall.
It'll be very inexpensive.
Yeah. And my one million viewers a week, which I'm blessed to have, and for whom I thank God every day, and whom I love, and whom I do my best to explain the law and the world from a small government, maximum individuality perspective, will have the chance to pick a subscription level that they want to pay for.
And obviously they won't have to worry about commercials, and they certainly won't have to worry about banning.
At least somewhere, maybe. But I'll tell you what, you know, people were responding to the battle for Speaker of the House like, oh, this is so bad, bad Republicans, blah, blah, blah.
And that turned out to be a good thing.
And I still think that that was a good process to go through.
So maybe this is kind of a similar thing.
It looks ugly right now.
It's a little clunky. There's a little tension in the air.
But at the end of this, maybe there'll be a good outcome.
We've got one segment left.
With Judge Napolitano, I'm telling you folks, Judging Freedom, great place to find information you're not going to see anywhere else, specifically with his Colonel McGregor interviews.
Just knocks it out of the park every time.
One more segment, four-minute break, and we will be right back.
Final segment here with Judge Napolitano.
And look, we did a tease, and Alex said we're going to have Judge Napolitano here talking about the Ukraine war.
And I just told him in the break, I said, look, we could talk the Ukraine war, but folks, I'm telling you, if you want to hear Judge Napolitano talking about the Ukraine war, you've got to go to Judging Freedom and watch his interviews with Colonel McGregor.
Clinton, the section of the Espionage Act under which they would have been prosecuted, she would have been prosecuted and he would have been if they were going to prosecute a sitting president, doesn't require intent.
Not at all. Here's why you and the public thinks that.
Because the attorney general or the prosecutor, the district attorney in Fulton County went before a special purpose grand jury which only investigates.
It doesn't have the authority to indict.
They have produced an 850-page report.
That report is going to be made known to the public on January 24th, next week.
Soon as it is, that report will be given to a grand jury that can indict.
And I think it looks like Gavin Newsom may be the leader in the clubhouse on the Democrat side of the aisle.
If they do want to go with a woman, for some reason they seem to like Gretchen Whitmer, but I think the American psycho-looking Newsom seems to be their go-to.
All right, folks, we'll be right back. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I got to tell you, that was a true treat for me.
It's very rare I get to interview somebody that I listen to.
A lot of the guests that I have on that are journalists and talk shows and stuff, they're friends of mine.
I listen to their stuff and I watch their content.
But it's a little bit different with Judge Napolitano.
That's somebody I go to for wisdom and guidance.
When it comes to news and information.
And so I'm getting a bunch of texts like, wow, what a great interview.
Are you guys sure you just met?
Well, I listen to the guy almost every day.
So it's like I already know him. So it's just like picking up a conversation with an old friend.
And I guess he was aware of who I was too.
So it was just, that was fantastic.
It was great to have Judge Napolitano in here.
And I didn't even know he was coming in.
I saw him in the studio with Alex and I was like, oh my gosh, I've got to go say hello.
And sure enough, he ends up coming on air.
So that was fantastic. And again, folks, none of this is possible without you guys shopping at Infowarsstore.com.
So tip of the cap to you.
Thank you for keeping us on air.
Please continue to do that.
And great moments like that will continue to be made here.
In fact, we got another guest who is going to be joining us in studio, Dr.
Andrew Huff. Now, he's doing an interview with Mike Adams right now.
He's kind of doing the rounds with some big information.
And we're hoping he's able to make it back here by 4, but he should be in studio with us before the end of the second hour.
But again, all of this made possible with your support at Infowarsstore.com.
And I'm going to get more into the Crowder issue, because it all ties into this.
But again, I don't have to go to YouTube and grovel to give my channel back.
I don't have to go to Facebook and grovel to unban me because I say something negative about vaccines.
So we don't have to do that.
We have to come on air and make great content and be as informative as possible so that you, the audience, will tune in, appreciate these transmissions, and support us by shopping at Infowarsstore.com.
If you don't want to get a product, we also have a donate page.
Donate $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford.
But I suggest trying out supplements.
I know from firsthand experience how great they are, like Brain Force Ultra.
I don't go on air without Brain Force Ultra.
If you want...
I just call it...
I call it...
It's like a mind-focused mind energy.
I don't really know how else to say it.
You drink caffeine, you can feel the jolt.
You can feel that extra boost of energy in your body.
Whether it's Brain Force Plus, the capsule, or Brain Force Ultra, the liquid tincture, it's like you can feel your brain is starting to go into prime movement, prime operating ability.
You can just feel it.
The brain energy, the focus, mental clarity, Brain Force Ultra, 50% off at Infowarsstore.com.
All right. Let me just kind of get some of the randomness out of the way, and I'm going to come back in the next segment and talk about this Crowder situation.
Because quite frankly, as I see it, as usual, most of the people commenting on this seem to be missing the ball altogether.
I am just seeing nothing but a swing and a miss, a swing and a miss, a swing and a miss from all the people commenting on this.
And so I'll get more into that in the next segment when I can focus for a whole segment on that.
Let's jump back over quickly to the World Economic Forum.
And here's Brian Kemp.
He made it over there to the World Economic Forum.
That's awfully telling. And our friends over there at the Rebel tried to catch up with Kemp and it went a little something like this in clip six.
Alright, when we come back, I'm going to lay into this Crowder Daily Wire issue.
And as usual, most other people are swinging and missing on the coverage.
But if you want to get the best coverage of it, I'm going to explain it on the other side of this break.
Alright, I want to give you my breakdown of the Stephen Crowder Daily Wire situation.
And what I've noticed is something all too often that this happens.
Is that most commentators responding to this story are completely missing the point.
And it's odd because it's almost as if they didn't watch anything Steven Crowder said and just don't even care to figure out what the actual issue is.
And so just to be brief, Steven Crowder and The Daily Wire have been in contract negotiations for at least a month because apparently the phone call that Crowder released is a little bit old and the website he's using right now, StopBigCon, was registered over a month ago.
So this is something that he's been working on for a while as well.
So these negotiations have obviously been going on.
And basically, what The Daily Wire wants is complete control and ownership, for lack of a better word, of Steven Crowder, the mug club, Lauder with Crowder, and all of his content.
And that might not be the perfect way, but it's the best summarization that I could give you.
Now, you might say, okay, well, Steven Crowder has a business decision.
They offered him that much money for ownership of his intellectual property and his content.
Maybe it's a good offer.
That was up for him to decide.
But in the contract, he didn't like what he saw, which was that If or when, at any point in time, he gets banned from the big tech platforms, specifically YouTube.
I think that this is mostly about YouTube because this is where a lot of the money is generated.
This is where a lot of these companies generate most of their revenue these days is YouTube.
So they're reliant on big tech.
Now, if you've been tuned into InfoWars, you know we've been talking about this issue for a long time.
We've been talking about the issue, what people call Conservative Inc., Con Inc., for a long time, and how they can control influencers and who makes it and doesn't in the conservative media.
So, you kind of already get an idea about that.
Now, thanks to Steven Crowder, we have an even better idea about that.
And I understand people saying, hey, you shouldn't record your friends, you shouldn't release the phone calls.
Fair enough, and Crowder admits that he may suffer backlash for that, but we like it when Project Veritas does it and exposes something.
So, okay, well, with Steven Crowder, what...
Is the difference here?
I think Crowder really didn't want to release the tape, but the negotiations didn't go the way he wanted, and he sees an issue that he wants to deal with here, and so he dealt with it.
But of course, however much money Crowder is making on YouTube, I'm sure it's very lucrative there.
Maybe he would make more with the Daily Wire.
Maybe he wouldn't. But if he loses his YouTube account, all of a sudden he's stuck in this contract where he's not even able to make money.
He's going to end up owing money.
So why in the world would he ever sign that contract, especially when he's been banned?
So the Daily Wire can say, hey, look, this is our contract.
You don't like it. Don't take it.
Fair enough. Maybe they'll offer it to somebody else.
I don't know if that's their standard contract.
I don't know if that's the deal that they have with others like Candace Owens.
I will say this again.
I've met Candace. We've done content.
I've met Steven Crowder. We've done content.
I don't know them that well personally, so I don't have any loyalties or dogs in the fight.
I will say what was odd, though, is I've never seen a situation, and I believe I can look at this stuff through a neutral lens whenever there's conservative infighting or issues like this, whatever you want to call it.
I've never seen Candace Owens so sloppy before.
Usually when there's an issue like this, Candace Owens is as sharp as they get.
And from a neutral perspective, I've never seen her take a losing stance or be sloppy on air like this, but her response to the Crowder mess has been sloppy and, to me, embarrassing.
And I like Candace Owens.
I'm just saying, I've never seen her like this, and that was a little odd.
Whereas when you go watch Crowder's response and Crowder's breakdown, it's very strong, very confident, very tight.
So I suggest if you want to see what's really going on, the only thing you need to watch is Crowder's video.
Forget about all the other commentary, even mine if you want.
Forget about everything else.
You need to watch Crowder's video from last night if you want to understand what's going on.
So here's the issue.
And I get it. Candace Owens is allowed on YouTube, and most of these other people that work for Daily Wire are allowed on YouTube and probably have never had to deal with censorship.
So they don't get where Crowder is coming from.
Now, I have a unique perspective in this because not only do I understand where Crowder is coming from, I'm already living in the future that Crowder is afraid of.
So forget about Crowder, forget about the money, forget about the dollar signs, forget about what you think about Daily Wire or Ben Shapiro or Crowder or anybody.
This is the issue that it comes down to.
And this is what Steven Crowder explains in his video.
And I think he is 100% spot on.
And I have to say this. I have no problem with the Daily Wire making business decisions.
That is perfectly fine.
I'm a capitalist. But I think conservatives need to know if a group is putting business ahead of patriotism, if a group is putting business and money ahead of the movement and the country, I think people should know that.
And if that's what's going on at the Daily Wire, maybe you should know that.
We don't have to worry about you thinking about that here at InfoWars, do we?
It's pretty obvious what's important here.
But all of that aside, here's the issue that I understand and that Crowder clearly understands, and this is why it's important and everybody seems to be missing this point.
And this is the point Crowder makes.
Sure, I can sign a deal with you for $50 million, and who knows how much that's actually worth to Crowder.
He has to pay bills, he has a crew, he has staff.
So I don't know what the actual monetary value of that might be with all the expenses he has.
But whether it's $20 million, $10 million, $5 million, $100 million, it doesn't matter.
The point is still there.
If I sign this deal with The Daily Wire to make myself extremely wealthy and successful, I have to censor myself.
I am now tied and I am anchored to big tech.
So how can I possibly move the conservative ball down the field?
How can I possibly move the country in the right direction if I'm anchored to big tech who's never going to let me budge?
How can I claim that I stand for free speech as a big issue if I censor myself to make $50 million for the Daily Wire?
So, I believe Crowder, and I get he's a showman, and there's a lot of showman tactics he used for this.
Whatever, he's a showman.
Good for him. He's good at what he does.
But I believe Crowder when he says, this is not about money.
This is not about fame.
This is not about fortune. This is not about success.
This is about, I believe in what I talk about.
Doesn't mean I don't want to be rich.
But I believe in what I talk about.
I believe in paving the way for the next wave of conservative influencers and commentators and talk show hosts.
And if I sign this deal, I have stabbed all of them in the back and I have betrayed everything I've ever stood for.
Why would I do that? So again, I don't know if that's the standard contract.
That others have had to sign.
I've never heard about anything like that.
I've heard some stuff from some other Con Inc.
type people, but most of it seems to be kind of lightning now.
They understand what's going on, but maybe not at the Daily Wire.
But if that's the standard contract, as Crowder points out last night, if this is your standard contract moving forward, then the conservative movement is dead.
And the conservative movement will never go anywhere.
And if the only way for a conservative to be successful or make money or get a large audience is to cater their message and anchor themselves to big tech, then the movement is dead.
And Crowder doesn't want to be a part of that.
And I say good for Crowder.
In fact, I think this is the best work he's ever done.
A lot of people disagree. I had a lot of debates last night about this.
But see, here's why we have a unique perspective.
Folks, if this is how it goes, you understand that the left now controls who's going to be successful and who's not in media.
And you know who they decided who's not?
Right here. Yours truly.
I'm never going to get a $50 million offer from anybody because I'm banned on YouTube.
I'm banned on Facebook.
I'm banned on Twitter. I'm banned on Instagram.
And I've talked to people in this conversation.
I've talked to the purse that funds a lot of these conservative influencers and movements, and they've told me, yeah, if you can't bring numbers from YouTube or Facebook or Twitter to the table, you're not going to get an offer.
So that's fine.
I know the role I took, and that's why I decided to join Infowars, because the movement is more important than myself and money, and it will always be that way.
So I don't care that there's never going to be a $50 million offer for Owen Schroeder on the table.
And you notice what else? All the people that you see commenting on this, all the people that you see having the
debate on this, how many of them have ever been politically persecuted? How
many of them have had to deal with the deep state for four years?
How many of them have been arrested and tossed in jail for multiple days? None of them.
So that's why I appreciate what Steven Crowder is doing, because he understands
the next Steven Crowder is never going to exist if I sign this contract.
The next Steven Crowder is never going to be successful if this is how we treat conservative
commentators in the future.
I'm sorry. In my view, there's nobody else except Crowder on the right side of this.
Doesn't mean Daily Wire's bad, but let's just face what it is.
What it appears to be, Daily Wire puts business over the movement.
Okay, fine. We always knew that about Conservative Inc.
That's fine. We're capitalists.
Continue to do that. We still need those people out there that they fund.
But here's what Crowder understands in the moment.
That why wouldn't we in this time period, Crowder has one of the biggest followings of conservative commentators, why wouldn't we in this time period try to find a way to not be reliant on big tech, to not anchor ourselves to big tech, and to utilize up-and-coming platforms like Getter and Rumble so that we don't have to worry about being at the whim of big tech censorship?
Duh! Like, why wouldn't you do that?
Why wouldn't you want to do that?
Because you have your business interests over conservative values and interests, is the simple answer.
So to me, these are the two issues that really need to be talked about.
Forget about the personalities and the people and the opinions and all of it.
It's how do we move forward as conservatives that like conservative content, How do we move forward if we know the people funding the content that we like put business and money over the movement?
And now we have to wonder, are they censoring themselves so that they can make money?
And then the issue on top of that, which I think is the bigger issue, is how does the conservative movement go forward specifically on the internet if our most influential people Commentators and talk show hosts are anchored to big tech, meaning they can't move.
So it's not a good precedent, it's not a good strategy, unless your top priority is to make as much money as possible.
Which, fine, just be honest about it.
You know, look, that's one thing Rush Limbaugh was always honest about.
He said, one of my biggest things here is to make as much money as I possibly can.
He never hid that fact.
So there's nothing wrong with that.
So the Daily Wire can come out and say as much, hey, yeah, you know what?
Our contracts link you to big tech, but we want to make hundreds of millions of dollars, so that's just what we do.
Fine, fair enough. People can know that, and they can decide whether to support you or not.
But those are the two issues.
And it's not, again, it's not just forget the names, the entities, the personalities.
These are bigger issues.
All Crowder has done is kind of open to the window, open to the door, showing you what goes on.
The two issues are, how do we move forward as conservatives if our most influential and largest audiences are anchored to big tech?
And do we care?
Do we need to know if the purse behind a lot of these conservative influencers are more concerned with their bottom line monetarily than they are with the movement, and they have no problem anchoring their talent to big tech?
So those are the two issues to me that, again, forget the personalities, the names, the entities.
Those are just the real issues right there.
And you know, I'll just say this, and I might not even be at liberty to say it, but folks, I'll just tell you, Alex has had similar contracts offered to him.
He's walked on every single one of them.
So, there you go.
I'll just go ahead and tell you that. It's millions of dollars.
I'm actually not at liberty to discuss this, so I'm kind of breaking rank here, but I'll tell you, Alex has had offers like that.
Because this is the most important fight, I believe, in US history.
We're at a pivotal turning point where we've actually shifted the narrative around this entire COVID BS that we've been dealing with in terms of the origin of the disease, the mRNA jabs, and all the people who are behind this.
We're, it's hard to believe we're in 2023 now, right?
I mean, it's 2020, the memories of it, the lockdowns and everything still feels so fresh, still feels like when you push on that wound, it hurts a little bit.
And they want us to forget about that.
Now they want us to forget about the vaccines.
They don't even want to talk about them.
They don't go on TV telling you how great they are as much anymore.
If you look at their actions and my personal involvement with both the House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Committee on Investigations, I don't have any faith that they're going to do the right thing, but that's why I'm out here pushing so hard, because we need everyone to stand up, get involved, talk to their representatives, the elected officials in their states, both at the federal level and the state level, because there's actually interesting things happening at the state level, too.
Florida, for example, where they've actually convened a grand jury to investigate some of the fraud and Corruption that's taken place.
And I think as the sort of the died suddenly movement or these injuries become more prevalent to every average day American, it really hits home with it.
I mean, myself, so I received two doses of Moderna.
I actually waited a period of three months because I was actually concerned about adverse reactions to the mRNA jabs.
I read the scientific literature at the time and I saw there's some damage in histopathology reports and female reproductive tissues and I made the decision, being somewhat informed I guess on this issue, to go ahead and get the jabs.
And I've had myocarditis from it.
I've had some arterial fibrillation.
And I'm a perfectly healthy guy.
I mean, I eat healthy. I exercise.
I was in the military. I'm very regimented.
And I think when they see that happening to every average day people, it hits home.
Do you think that was kind of a tag team situation where the vaccine reset your immune system and so now you were more susceptible to a virus making you sick plus maybe the side effect of a myocarditis?
The reason why I didn't is because the medical establishment has been so corrupted.
I have a two-year-old son, and I brought my two-year-old son in.
In my state, it's not mandated for my child to get vaccinated with the mRNA, at least yet.
That could change. But...
So I talk to the doctors, and I talk shop talk, and I ask them questions like, well, what do you think of the mRNA vaccine?
And when they're pushing the HMOs or Big Pharma's agenda, to me, with not really understanding the details of...
The effects it can have on the purpose or how well it works in terms of preventing disease transmission, I worry.
And I've experienced that with all my clinicians in my own personal care and then also with my sons.
And I talk to other people, I talk to doctors, and I think the doctor in the medical community is starting to wake up finally, but it's been a long path to get here.
Well, I definitely think the atmosphere has changed around two issues.
Well, one, the origin of the disease.
I think most people in the public believe that it was a laboratory leak scenario.
And I think many people are now comfortable discussing potential adverse events.
You know, the one thing that's unique about this is that...
In comparison, every vaccine that is administered to people has adverse events at some rate.
But those rates have been low and been acceptable.
The difference is our risk tolerance for adverse events related to SARS-CoV-2 has increased.
And the reason why I believe that risk tolerance has increased is because the fear that they stoked in the population.
So, you know, the psychological operation, which has now been proven through the Twitter files and other releases on the American people, really scared the crap out of everyone.
Well, plus, you tune into the local news, the national news, your TV, your newspaper for a year telling you, COVID, COVID, COVID, COVID, oh, now, oh, thank you, I can be saved by this vaccine.
I mean, it's just inhuman nature when you're afraid to look for something to quell those fears.
Huff on the other side. Alex Jones here with a massive game changer.
We've been working on this for over a year and finally it is ready to roll out to market to you the viewers and listeners to enrich your life and fund InfoWars to stay on the air a 360 win.
Introducing InfoWarsMD, 10 new products that are private labeled from the top company in the United States recognized for the strongest, highest quality, highest tested products that are out there.
10 new products, the Super Greens, Super Food Greens, the Turmeric 95.
We've got incredible full spectrum high-end CBD oil at incredibly low prices in 10 mg, 20 mg and 1,000 mg.
So be careful. We've got super high quality collagen for your skin and more.
And the products just go on and on.
Max Mushroom is an insane nootropic that naturally boosts your cognitive ability.
Better mood. Unbelievable.
All of this is simply incredible.
Then of course we've got Nitric Boost that's got the known compounds to increase nitrous oxide massively.
In your blood that is so good for your whole body, and then LibidoRx will absolutely blow you away.
It's all available at InfoWarsStore.com right now.
And look, these are clones of some of the best selling products in the nation under
other names.
And the difference is, many of these products retail for $100.
We're slashing the price on that massively.
Check it out at InfowarStore.com.
Normally, if somebody's trying to get 1,000 mg CBD oil of its quality, it's $100 to $150.
Ladies and gentlemen, This is way, way, way, way below that.
So it's all available at Infowarsstore.com.
You've got to check out the new line, InfowarsMD, exclusively at Infowarsstore.com, and it funds our operation.
Andrew Huff in studio with us, and we had a good talk during the break about, and I want to pick it up where we kind of left it off there, How did you end up getting the vaccine?
Or I guess you were explaining how, you know, there were some issues, but you wanted to travel and you knew that couldn't travel unless I got the vaccine.
So kind of talk about that.
But the broader issue of how many other people, it was like, oh, like I explained, my aunt had to go see my grandma.
She had to get the vaccine. You want to go travel to Europe?
You got to get the vaccine. Let's say a business trip you had to go on.
Well, tons of things. I mean, so what's been released since, I mean, I'm so much more informed today than I was back in 2021.
One of the simple facts is that the vaccine manufacturers or pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer in particular, they released their toxicology studies and reports on the harms of the products.
And they actually, it's really sketchy.
When you go look at this report, you can see that there's profiles of redacted ingredients that It's just totally blacked out.
Yeah well they'll show like a line graph and you look at the line graph and it looks like there's some adverse event happening or some kind of reaction happening something that's some tox profile to it that's negative and it's redacted and it doesn't tell you what it is.
Well, the next thing is then you have other whistleblowers like Brooke Jackson, and she worked on the Pfizer clinical trials, and she blew the whistle because they were not...
Well, there's a number of things, as I understand it, and you should have her on the show, but she noticed that they were not counting adverse events as adverse events.
So in the clinical trial...
In the controlled trial. If someone got sick, someone got died, they would mark the person as having some other condition that was not related to receiving.
Correct. So here we have multiple instances of fraud occurring.
And actually these multiple instances of fraud Might be a good legal argument to go after the vaccine manufacturers because not only did they commit fraud, but they committed fraud against the US government and governments internationally if they told everyone that there was no harm in this.
So I was talking to a few lawyers about that.
I'm not a lawyer, but they think that might be a potential avenue to go after these people.
And have you talked to other people that took the vaccine, too, that are discussing maybe they had side effects, same side effects, different side effects, regrets?
Oh, absolutely. I have a number of friends, males age around 30 to 40, friends that experience similar myocarditis, problems breathing, cardiovascular, felt weak while working out, that kind of thing.
And there's been over, I think...
1,000 or 1,100 publications on myocarditis alone.
I think I might have mentioned that already, but this is well-documented now by the scientific community, and even those peer-reviewed publications from reputable scientists are being suppressed.
You see no discussion of that in the mainstream media.
So everyone's aware of the 10 or so different types of conditions which are associated with the mRNA jabs.
Is everyone experiencing these side effects?
No, okay? But they are happening at a higher level or a greater frequency that's ever been accepted with a vaccine.
If you compare this to other vaccines, they all have side effects or adverse events, but they're at very low rates.
And with mRNA, it's at a much higher rate.
And based on what we know now, so the disease is not, SARS-CoV-2, if you get infected with it, is not as severe as what we were led to believe.
I mean, it's a doomsday scenario.
Everyone's dying. And actually, the epidemiology statistics of the amount of the burden of the caseload, the prevalence of the disease, was way overestimated for a number of reasons.
And that's starting to trickle out into the mainstream media.
Actually, over the last few days, that story, that narrative is getting out there.
So, yeah, there was a lot of disinformation to go around, and people made a lot of bad decisions based on fear, which isn't their fault.
And what's interesting that I'm not seeing enough of, your response to this makes sense.
You wrote the book, you're doing the media tour, you're talking about what you've learned after getting the vaccine, but what's been amazing to me is watching this new response from people that really promoted the vaccine, ridiculed, scolded, attacked people that didn't get it, And now they're kind of learning, oh, well, I was lied to about COVID and the vaccine.
But instead of being mad at the people that lied to them, they're still saying they don't regret it, and they're still mad at the people for not taking it.
I mean, that's Stockholm Syndrome 101 right there.
I mean, I think people don't want to believe, and this is what the awakening is about, people don't want to believe that the government lied to them, that the pharmaceutical industry lied to them.
I think the thing that I find most fascinating about this from a psychological or social psychological perspective is that The people that are now coming out in strong defense of the government and big pharma are typically people that were never aligned with the pharmaceutical industry.
I don't know your politics. I'm a libertarian now.
So I went down the path.
I actually used to be a blue dog Democrat.
And I was very politically active as a young man.
I was still a Democrat. I was in the military.
And then the party shifted.
Left. Hard left.
And then I became a Republican.
And then the Republicans broke my heart a number of times because they never went after the issues that I thought were most important to the conservative party.
That's what I call it. And I think all the libertarians love to hammer this on social media, is that if you look at the two parties and how they're working together, they work together in 90% of action.
We've got to take a break. Can you do one more segment?
I know you've been busy. Oh, absolutely.
All right, one more segment. We'll take this break.
We'll be right back with Andrew Huff.
Don't go anywhere. AndrewHuff.com.
I've got some other questions in regards to the COVID and the vaccines, but it's funny you're talking about the psychological operations in the military.
Maybe we'll kind of finish the conversation with that.
Let me just get to two more of the issues here.
One, is there anything you're doing as far as to mitigate side effects or you're concerned about side effects?
Is there anything you're doing health-wise with that concern or that you've been recommended to do?
I haven't been recommended to do anything, but I mean, I read the scientific literature and I talk to a lot of the other famous scientists and doctors that are in the movement, so to speak.
So I take vitamin D, I take zinc, take a multivitamin, and I exercise and I eat a healthy diet.
I mean, most of maintaining your immune system and probably trying to fight off any harms from the spike protein in the vaccine, if you have any prolonged harm from it, is just probably living a healthy lifestyle.
I mean, that applies to most aspects of health, whether it's infectious diseases or chronic disease.
And maybe if there is a silver lining to all of this, it's people thinking about their health again.
And the one last thing that we were talking about earlier, and this is the big issue that kind of gets skipped, and that's the immune memory that gets lost or attacked, rather, when you take this vaccine.
And we were talking about it in the break, and basically my analogy was it's like, Well, I think that's a hypothesis yet that has a lot of weight behind it.
I think there has to be more research conducted on that, but I think it holds weight.
If you look at the newest jab out and the release of the bivalent mRNA SARS-CoV-2 jabs, it actually increases your risk of becoming infected.
I mean, think about that. They're crazy.
So if there is some benefit in reducing the negative consequence of becoming ill with the disease, okay, but increases your risk of becoming infected, Then what you're actually doing is, it's two nasty things.
One, you're increasing transmission throughout the population, so more people are likely to get sick, okay?
And the other thing is, and Dr.
Robert Malone came out early on this, and so did I on social media around LinkedIn before I got kicked off LinkedIn, is that by having these mass inoculation policies where you have to vaccinate the entire population with a leaky vaccine, meaning it doesn't stop transmission.
Which is what they were proposing. Well, I know that, but the reality is when you have this leaky vaccine, it applies selection pressure to the population of a virus with an individual.
So if you're blocking the genetics for one type of SARS-CoV-2 within your body, and there could be multiple, it actually increases the probability that new variants will emerge.
Which happened. And that's what's happening.
So if you actually go plot the graphs of the incidence of the disease, and you look at the subtypes or the variants of the disease, the places where they jab more, they have more variant emergence.
Well, and Israel is a really interesting test case for this because they had one of the highest vaccination rates and stringent mandates for their population to get vaccinated.
And you can see this play out clear as day.
They keep on giving more jabs and more variants keep emerging there.
And that becomes a global problem, though, because if we keep on jabbing with having this max vaccination policy for something that doesn't stop transmission...
And just generally speaking, if you don't see how vaccinating every single person on the planet with an experimental injection is a bad idea, then maybe you should just sit the next couple plays out if you don't understand how that's a problem.
And just to get a little conspiracy theoretical here, let's just say somebody actually wanted to hit you with a bioweapon.
Let's just say... Theoretically, somebody actually wanted to hit you with a bioweapon.
Boy, they might want to wipe out the immune system of that population first, wouldn't they, Amy?
I don't know. Just a theory that I might have.
I don't know if you care to comment on that, but you did notice this LinkedIn picture I have on my desk earlier.
This is your psychological operations specialist, apparently Haley Lujan.
Now, we've done specials on this.
They use these young girls and internet filters and social media apps to recruit young men into the military, thinking, oh, look, I'm going to go meet these hot chicks.
They're everywhere. And it's really just a giant psyop.
Well, I know for a fact that the FBI, the CIA, the DIA, the Intelligence Committee at large, for collecting human intelligence, they'll use apps like...
I guess Twitter or dating apps, I guess, Tinder or other dating apps to lure people in to collect intelligence.
And I mean, that's an old Soviet tactic where, you know… A honeypot.
A honeypot or a sparrow, they call them sometimes.
And that could be male or female, but they're highly effective.
And the other thing that happens with these types of social media accounts is… They're running psychological operations on bots and then also human-operated fake accounts.
And they're doing it at scale. And the one that I've picked up on on social media is that there is these no-virus people.
And I actually baited these people to see how they respond.
So they claim that there's no proof that SARS-CoV-2 exists.
Well, it could be both, but look at what that does.
So why would these people come out in force?
Well, these people, you say, who have these accounts come out in force and then all of a sudden attack someone like me on social media.
All of a sudden I have, and then this happened to Dr.
Fleming as well. All of a sudden there's like a thousand accounts attacking me saying, no, viruses exist.
You're an idiot and all these things.
Well, you just block them all right away.
But you have to identify and recognize the fact that these are not people driving that because...
I think most people in the world believe that viruses exist.
I mean, think about how radical, a skeptical kind of opinion that is.
But all of a sudden, there's a whole army of these people on social media.
These types of accounts are either backed by the pharmaceutical industry or the intelligence community.
Someone who's nefarious because what they're trying to do is they're trying to drive wedges right now between the experts and discredit us right now because we are getting so close to victory.
This is their only tactic left.
They're trying to divide and conquer right now with all the experts who are going around and talking about this.
And really, like you said, we haven't done the big studies into this from our perspective, even though there's a lot of data out there, a lot of new studies coming out with the side effects.
There hasn't really been a study funded where somebody who's skeptical, let's say somebody who's skeptical of the vaccines or skeptical of COVID says, I'm going to run this study.
I'm skeptical of the whole thing.
Let's see what I find out.
It's really most of the studies have been run by people that are in bed with big pharma already.
Oh, and that's par for the course, and that's just the very nature of the current state of affairs, I guess, with academia right now and a lot of medical research.
It's either contract by the pharmaceutical companies themselves, or the money is getting sent to academic organizations, universities, where they depend heavily on NIH grant dollars or pharmaceutical contract money to support their education program.
And that's both teaching and research.
It's just how the business goes.
And the easiest way to get silenced as a professor, a research professor, or be run out of academia, so to speak, is to come out against the pharmaceutical industry or the status quo.
I had a couple papers which are in my book, and I put them at the very end of my book because I couldn't get these things published back in 2015 or 2016.
And I couldn't figure out why I couldn't get these published.
So the one paper that I discuss is the economics of pandemics.
I call it pandemic winners.
And all the journals I submitted this to really didn't understand why I was writing this, but I took a look at this and I realized, I'm like, holy crap, pandemics are big business.
Well, we just watched it. Yeah, yeah, and there's tons of money behind it, but I wrote a paper about this in 2015.
None of the major journals would accept it.
Not interested. And it was very well written, I mean, because it had been rejected so many times.
Every time it gets rejected, you're like, well, I need to make this better.
Now, ladies and gentlemen, Well, I lost my sheet here.
But anyway, getting distracted.
Ladies and gentlemen, barely plugged today.
We've got to pay some bills around here.
It'd be nice to have $50 million to throw around at people, but that's not how it goes around here.
If we had $50 million, it would all be invested right back into the crew and into these great studios.
Folks, I'm telling you, What we have built here, what Alex has built here, what you, the audience, has built here, rivals.
I mean, we have the most high-tech, advanced studios in the business.
We run the most fast-paced, multimedia transmissions in the world.
You have built this mothership.
And so we only have like one one-hundredth, one one-thousandth of the budget that these other big guys have with the huge donors and the huge money and the access to big tech.
So We're still like the biggest giant on the block, but we don't get the funding we need because we're banned and censored everywhere.
But that's okay. You've put us here.
You've kept us here. And that includes you and the guests and everything else so that we can build band.video.
And so we can have a team at Infowars.com with the writers and the great crew and the great studios and the great guests.
So you make all that possible when you shop at Infowarsstore.com.
We make it easy with all the great products and all the great supplements.
Last night, boy, I'll tell you, I needed a deep sleep.
I needed a deep sleep last night.
So what did I do? I went to the go-to for a deep night's sleep, and that's Down and Out from Infowarsstore.com.
That is my go-to.
I need a deep, restful sleep.
Down and Out, Infowarsstore.com.
One of the great supplements that we have there.
But check them all out.
Read all the reviews. Find out why when people call in.
Some of them just want to talk about the great supplements that we have.
Find out why by shopping at InfoWareStore.com.
By the way, we do still have big specials going.
Like the Real Red Pill Plus, 50% off.
Brain Force Ultra, 50% off.
Super Male Vitality, 25% off.
It's all there at InfoWarsStore.com and it's your support that keeps us on the air.
Help me out last night. Man, I had a nice, nice restful sleep.
Was even able to wake up, get a nice, big, long workout in this morning, too.
That's how great my sleep was last night.
Got up early, had a nice workout, then came in here to get ready for the show.
All right. Let me just kind of clutter bomb this segment out of the way here before we get into the third hour.
And by the way, I won't go too off into this, but, you know, I was joking with some of the crew before the show.
So we've played some of these specials or we've made commercials out of this.
It was actually one of our most viral commercials and videos on Bandop Video was this female, good-looking female PSYOP that the military runs either to get recruitment or just get social media followers or whatever the case may be.
But we were joking, and we kind of both had the same thought or joke, and maybe we were joking, but maybe we were serious.
Like, I even wonder, is this stuff even real?
Like, is this AI stuff?
Like, are there really women out there whose job it is to go out and put on makeup and do the filter and try to get these guys to join the military?
Like, is that real? Is this AI? Is it a troll?
I mean, it's everywhere.
But you notice, you notice, so the military, though, they want to tell you how woke they are.
So you can be a big fatty and join the military, or you can be a female and serve on the front lines, and oh, we're gay, and we got the high heels, and all that other stuff.
But you notice what they do there?
You notice what they do? They take the traditional, good-looking female, honeypot, To trick, deceive, and lure people into joining the military.
So that's funny. As woke as they are, what do they do?
They go to the oldest go-to in the book.
The honeypot.
The good-looking female honeypot.
For all the wokeness.
For all the...
The work coming around and being politically correct.
What do they do?
They use women as honeypots.
Or is it all a troll?
Is it all AI? What is it?
Pretty wild stuff.
I mean, it's almost as wild as the phenomenon of nurses dancing through the TikTok pandemic, or through the COVID pandemic, the TikTok nurses.
So that's funny.
But is it even real?
It's just so crazy, you can't even believe it.
Boy, oh boy. Quickly, some other notes here on Twitter.
Popular Twitter account you may be familiar with, CatTurd.
Way to go. They've screwed up the algorithm so much on Twitter that everyone is completely invisible and engagements are almost down to nothing.
It's almost not worth being on here anymore.
This shouldn't be hard.
Take the algorithms and shadow bands off so we can see each other.
And then CatTurd uploaded some of the data and analytics showing exactly what CatTurd is talking about.
And Elon Musk likes CatTurds.
And Elon Musk responds to the cat turd and says, this is bizarre looking into it.
Now, I can tell you, I don't know all of the inside baseball.
I know a little bit of it. There's definitely good people that have some influence right now at Twitter.
Doing good work, trying to figure out how all the shadow banning and censorship and trying to get people reinstated.
That's definitely going on.
But there's most certainly either still built into the algorithms or the code or still FBI agents or somebody there that is still engaging in mass censorship, shadow banning, ghosting, and all this other stuff.
And I'm going to explain something that I know about here that I can show you as well.
But Elon Musk says he's looking into it.
I believe him. Here's what you got to understand, folks.
You know, Elon Musk is doing like a bunch of things.
He doesn't have time to hang around at Twitter all day.
He spent a lot of time there a couple months ago when he bought it, and he tried to get a lot of things worked out.
He's got a couple people he's working with or he's put trust into.
But still, it's like, you know, when daddy's away, the kids will play.
So Elon Musk is dealing with...
Rocket ships and Starlink and all this other stuff, and he doesn't have time to sit there at Twitter all day and deal with it.
So there's definitely some stuff going on, and I've noticed it personally.
I've been told about some of this stuff personally.
And I want to say, you know, Ali Alexander yesterday, through no request of mine, put out a tweet asking for Twitter to reinstate at All I Do Is Owen my original account.
And I just gotta say, I've never been one that wants to ask anybody for promotion.
I just can't do it. And maybe it's a pride thing or an ego thing, and I should drop it.
But I just don't. So, when I launched a new Twitter account, at Owen Schroer Live, and I did my first live stream, A couple weeks ago.
I didn't ask for any promotion.
I didn't tell all the big influencers and people I know on Twitter with millions of followers to help me out and retweet it.
Call it my ego, call it my pride, whatever.
I didn't do it. All I did was come on to this show and tell you I have a Twitter account at Owen Schroer Live.
I'm going to be live tonight. And the first transmission did pretty well.
In fact, if you go to that Twitter account, I'm going to show you exactly what's going on that I've experienced personally here.
If you go to that Twitter account, you go to the first transmission I did, and by the way, everything just keeps getting better here as I'm working on my presentation and my production value at my home studio learning some new things.
If you go look at the first transmission I did, I believe it was January...
Ninth, maybe? Let's go all the way to the first transmission.
I've done five live streams here.
If you go to the first transmission, you're going to see, look at that, 17.6 thousand viewers.
Okay? That's with no promotion, no followers, literally nothing.
All I did was come on these airwaves and say, I'm going to be on live at this Twitter account tonight.
We got 17,000 views on the first video.
Now look at the more recent posts, guys.
Go ahead and you can scroll up and look at them.
Now what's happened since?
2,300 views.
Okay. What's happened since?
1,500 views.
What's happened since? 600 views.
And then last night, where did we end up last night?
500 views. So...
Explain to me how my followers go up, but my view count goes down.
And you can go look.
I can tell you right now, the name Owen Troyer's been shadow banned.
All my content and accounts have been shadow banned.
You can't even get notifications for when I go live.
But if you're a fake Owen Schroer account, you get verified, you get promoted in the search results, and you're allowed to deceive people and go into Twitter spaces and stuff.
By the way, after I sign off here, I am going to go to a Twitter space on the Gateway Pundit with that Twitter account.
All right, into the third and final hour.
I need to be really focused here so I can at least do a couple segments of your phone calls.
By the way, look, we're joking in the break.
One of the great crew members, producers here, has gone down the rabbit hole of the psychological operation females recruiting into the military.
I don't even want to go down that World War II nonsense he just said.
I mean, just what complete rubbish.
Oh, what if Taiwan goes next?
Lindsey, and I guess what he's insinuating is that if we don't go to war with Russia, then the Chinese are going to be more aggressive.
Lindsey, in case you haven't noticed, the Chinese and the Russians are now in a really strong relationship thanks to Joe Biden.
And we could have stopped that by not going to war with Russia in Ukraine.
But because we have illegally gone to war with Russia in Ukraine, they've now been pushed into the arms of China.
So yeah, Lindsey, you're so smart, Lindsey Graham, aren't you?
You are just a genius, Lindsey.
By pushing Russia into the arms of China, that has made the invasion of Taiwan...
A higher probability.
Whereas if we wouldn't have gone to war with Russia in Ukraine, they wouldn't have had a strong relationship with China and maybe wouldn't be so aggressive in the South China Sea and Taiwan and Hong Kong.
But now that they know...
Ukraine and the West are launching an illegal war against Russia.
Russia's now teamed up with China.
And so now China and Russia can go tit for tat in their geopolitical maneuverings and foreign policies.
And our leadership of Joe Biden and Lindsey Graham seem to have no idea what's going on.
Not even a clue.
Here's what they know.
Money in Ukraine for them.
That's what it's all about.
Third and final hour here of the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com.
I don't want to belabor this Ukraine issue, but there is more news here.
U.S. will send striker combat vehicles to Ukraine for first time as part of the brand new $2.5 billion security package.
Folks, look.
This is what needs to be understood about Russia.
The war in Ukraine and the United States.
Ukraine in a war against Russia has about a snowball's chance in heaven.
Ukraine's fighting forces have already been completely devastated.
The equipment, food supplies, everything, they're devastated.
They're done. They're shot.
It's over. Russia, on the other hand, Has barely even tapped into its true military potential.
Is basically using and discarding of old military equipment and kind of sending out the more degenerate lower levels of the military in these first stages of their operations.
And so what Russia understands and what the United States media is not telling you is that Russia's not at war with Ukraine, ladies and gentlemen.
Russia is at war with the United States in Ukraine.
It's gotten to the point now where the Ukrainian military is completely defeated.
Now they're just fighting America.
They're fighting against our funding.
They're fighting against our equipment.
Is that really the situation you want?
Do you want to go to war with Russia over Ukraine?
That's what Lindsey Graham wants.
And as I explained yesterday, Oh, Putin threats nuclear war.
Putin threats nuclear war.
Again, do you know the mind of the Russian?
Do you understand the psychology?
They burnt Moscow to the ground instead of letting the Nazis take it.
They burned their own city to the ground instead of letting it get conquered by Nazis.
Do you understand the psychology here?
You know, there's an old joke, an old literature joke, and I think I'm getting it right, but it's The French will die for love.
The English will die for honor.
The Americans will die for freedom.
And the Russians will die.
That's from classical literature.
That's the psychological makeup.
So, do you really, do you really want to start a war with Russia over Ukraine?
Because that's what's going on because the likes of Joe Biden have been doing so much corrupt criminal activity there that now they have to protect the Ukraine.
They're on the hook.
And now the entire country has to be on the hook for this illegal war started by Joe Biden in Ukraine?
Folks, even Obama knew better than this.
Even Obama tried to stop this from happening.
And maybe this has something to do with the documents.
So there's Some new news with the Biden documents.
And it just shows you how corrupt the whole thing was, actually.
Here's the Wall Street Journal.
Justice Department considered but rejected role in Biden document search.
Here's another headline. Biden attorney interviewed by feds in docs review, but no 302 summary.
No record of what was that what was said what was that?
No evidence so far to support Biden search experts say no evidence. He literally had the documents
That's all the evidence you need.
No evidence for the search.
He had the damn documents.
He wasn't even the president.
There was no clearance.
It was all illegal.
Now, the same question remains.
Why did they decide to find or discover or turn over these documents now?
And why is the media reporting it now?
When this has been known for months, before the midterms even.
But so here's the new riff.
Here's the new obvious question.
So when Biden's lawyers, because remember, oh, it's all above board.
Oh, Biden's cooperating.
Oh, okay, yeah.
I mean, if you go downtown and you stab and rape a woman and you go cooperate with the police investigation, does that make you the good guy?
No. You're still the murdering rapist.
You're still the scumbag. So, oh, Biden's cooperating.
So what is cooperating? He's the criminal!
But here's what we now know.
When the lawyers or the aides or whoever it was found the documents and called the National Archives, the Justice Department was told that this was going on and The lawyers said, in the archives, the National Archives said to the Department of Justice, do you want to oversee the moving, the transfer, the securing of these files?
And how convenient that the Department of Justice said, no thank you.
How convenient.
And they say, oh, there's only 20 documents, or there's only these three troves of documents.
Folks, we don't know. We don't know how many documents there are, and neither does the Department of Justice, because they declined to be a part of the original investigation.
And now they come around and they say, oh, we're going to be investigating.
We're launching a special counsel into the Biden documents.
Months after they've already hidden them.
Months after they already rejected the investigation.
Months after they could have been at the crime scene to make sure it wasn't tampered with.
So this thing is clearly set up.
Again, I'm not convinced that the motive is this is being used to get Joe Biden out of running for 2024, but I think that's the highest probability on this situation right now.
Doesn't mean it can't come back to actually hurt the Democrats and Joe Biden, but that's what this thing appears to be.
The FBI, the Department of Justice, they were all in on it.
And you just look at all the convenient timing and all the convenient...
We're not investigating.
We're at the Department of Justice.
It all looks like it was staged from the very beginning.
And of course, Biden has no clue what's going on.
He needs to be reminded his name when he wakes up in the morning.
So it's just a complete disaster.
And it just shows you how Joe Biden is above the law.
And the Department of Justice protects its own.
And then we have to sit here and play tiddlywinks with whatever information they want to give us, hiding the true story, protecting the true criminals.
Oh, and then they come out today and they say, we have no idea...
Who leaked the Supreme Court decision?
And in the Washington Post, you guys just roll me the B-roll of clip 11.
The Washington Post puts up on their, I guess it's their TikTok, this woman in a judge's gown dancing, saying the Supreme Court has stated they can't figure out who leaked the draft opinion that overturned Roe versus Wade.
Oh, it's so funny at the Washington Post.
Yeah, they're laughing and dancing.
Why? Because they got away with a crime!
Because they got away with a crime.
So the Washington Post laughs and jokes because they got away with a crime.
But I'm curious. Put the video back on the screen.
Is there a hidden message here?
Is there a hidden message maybe here?
Maybe they know. Maybe the Washington Post, they actually do know who leaked the documents.
And maybe there's a subtle hidden message in that video.
Do I have to say it?
I'll leave that for you to figure out for yourself.
But it's all a joke.
Yeah, we committed a crime.
Yeah, we leaked the documents and we're above the law.
Of course not. Because what about all the police officers that the Democrats have put a target on their back?
Dozens murdered every year.
What about all the Trump supporters that had a target put on their back?
Thousands assaulted in the last five years.
What about all the Republicans in Congress like Rand Paul who have had people show up at their house to try to kill them?
What about the Supreme Court justices like Brett Kavanaugh who have had Democrats show up at their house to try to kill them?
What about the members of Congress?
They were playing baseball, Republican baseball practice, when a wild, lunatic Democrat showed up to try to commit a mass murder and a mass shooting of them.
Really, Eric? Do you want this precedent applied?
When do we start blaming the Democrats for all the division and the violence and the hatred that you guys have caused?
Oh, I see. You're not held to that standard, just like the Washington Post getting illegal leaks from the Supreme Court.
I get it. Alright, I'm going to take calls in the last two segments.
So I've got to get through as much of this news as I can here.
The number to call in, 877-789-2539.
877-789-2539.
It's Friday, so we'll do open line Fridays.
Any topic of discussion is welcome.
Alright. Let's just start picking it up and putting it down.
By the way, we got a new...
This is the Facebook files from Robbie Swove.
Just for the lack of time here, I'll read you the first in this thread, but worth a read.
And you'd say, well, why would they not tell the kids?
Because this is a normal event that's been going on.
The Columbia Values Diversity Breakfast has been going on since 2014.
And yeah, they do the leftist bullcrap, but it's mostly been above board.
Now all of a sudden they got your drag queen sexy time with the kids there in attendance.
They just shocked everybody.
They surprised everybody with this.
I don't think this ends well.
In case you haven't noticed, the folks in Missouri don't really like this crap.
And it's one of the only states that actually has had multiple drag queen sexy time events for kids canceled because of the backlash and the outrage.
Don't be surprised if this deal doesn't end in a lawsuit or something.
Because I don't think the people of Columbia, Missouri are going to take well to that.
Even though it's a liberal town, it's a college town, there's still basic conservative instincts and values.
And people don't want to see a man in a dress with a beard and breasts dancing around for their children.
Just not really into that.
So there you go.
Imagine you get surprised by that.
It's like, oh, you're at a baseball game, drag queen.
What? Oh, you're at a diversity breakfast, drag queen.
Oh, you're at the hockey game. Gay pride.
Like, man, can I just watch a hockey game, please?
Be nice. Shock video.
Man carjacked in broad daylight by armed teens at Philadelphia Auto Shop.
Then you had this, and I mean, we don't know it's the same person.
It's the same name. Soledad O'Brien was working with a program called The Next Black in America.
The next Black in America, liberals working on this program, and they promoted a young man named LaVon Longstreet when he was in second grade as the next star of Black in America.
This was in 2013.
Well, now LaVon Longstreet, 17 years old, has been charged with murder.
Another suspect in the Christmas weekend of Mall of America homicide was arrested in Georgia today.
LaVon Longstreet charged with murder.
Along with his mother that drove him there.
What a sad thing. Teenagers getting involved in shootings.
And then of course the next black in America and then that young man that the liberals were supposedly trying to help ends up becoming a murderer.
I guess they didn't really help, did they?
But don't look to space for answers because, you know, that's racist too.
Astrophysicist Natalie Gosnell says the field of space is riddled with white supremacy.
Hmm. You know, actually, you're kind of showing your racism here, is what you're doing.
You think you're fighting racism, but you're actually showing your racism.
I don't even want to get into it, but, I mean, space is white supremacy.
Flying a plane is white supremacy.
What else is white supremacy? If you see a white person doing something, I guess that means it's white supremacy.
You know, white people can't do anything.
So let's just put anybody not white in charge of the space program, and it'll be fine.
We'll be to the moon in no time.
In fact, we shouldn't even have Elon Musk building rockets because he's white.
He is African, but he's white.
He's the wrong African. So maybe Elon Musk should just give over SpaceX and Starlink to somebody who's not white because certainly they would do much better under the leadership role.
You had a bunch of stop oil supporters blocking the road in England today.
You know, that's funny because they didn't make it to the World Economic Forum where even Greta Thunberg admits that those are the people killing the climate more than anybody.
Even Greta understood that.
I have the video clips.
I'm just out of time, so I can't get to it.
But, you know...
Who's smarter? Greta Thunberg or Kamala Harris?
Before you answer that question, let's go to clip eight.
Here's Kamala Harris talking about the phenomenon of electricity.
Yeah, I think with the Biden documents, there's zero chance that, you know, he took those, you know, and stuck them in his garage or whatever, and they just showed up, you know, miraculously.
Somebody has a purpose for them, and whether that's to get him to resign or not, I'm not so sure.
That's what most people would think.
I think it may be the opposite.
It may be that they want him to not resign.
And this is kind of the old, you know, mobster.
Just when I thought I was out, they pulled me back in.
And so they can hold that over his head and say, look, if you resign, then you're subject to be charged.
But as long as you're in office, the Justice Department is not going to charge you.
So they can keep him in office that way.
And then they don't really care about Biden.
They can burn him whenever they want.
But they want to get a few more things done that they can lay at his feet, and then when the time is right, you know, then they can burn him and bring in whoever they want from then on.
You know, that's an interesting perspective I haven't really heard proposed, and I can't say that I disagree with the premise.
And it's also, you know, this is the other thing worth noting as well.
You know, Biden is so compromised by so many different groups of people that there's like a war behind the scenes for who's going to be the real puppet master of Joe Biden.
I mean, there's no doubt at this point.
Oh, like, for example...
The CIA goes and meets with Zelensky, and then Zelensky gets $2.5 billion.
Well, who's really running that?
The CIA. That's not Biden.
That's the CIA running that war in Ukraine.
So Zelensky is officially now a CIA operative and running a CIA proxy war.
Biden has no control over the situation.
So, yeah, I agree.
It's an anvil over his head.
Is it to get him out?
Is it to keep him in? That's an interesting perspective I haven't heard.
Everyone's the last several months talking about Trump with this warp speed.
Listen how bad it is.
He's got to retract it, etc., etc.
Now, one thought is this.
Now you see, even in a lot of mainstream media, they're leaking it out a little bit.
Networks are saying, you know, beware.
People are dying.
Young people are dying of myocarditis, heart attacks, you know, debilitating diseases, etc., etc.
Now, we all know the deep state controls the mainstream media.
You know, it's a thought to think that maybe that's how they're going to maybe make Trump look all that much worse now because he made this thing warp speed.
What do you think? Well, sure, I could understand, but now you're assuming that Trump understands that, and that's, like, what do you say, that Trump is baiting them to do that, or what?
Well look, that would be, I would say that would be on brand because it's this mysticism of everything they accused Trump of is exactly what they did.
So that would be totally on brand for them to blame Trump for this vaccine when they were the ones pushing it, mandating it, telling how great it was.
Yeah, Trump's kind of in that boat with them.
But it would be, so I mean it's par for the course if they would do that.
But here's the other thing.
If you really think Trump is 10 moves ahead of them on this deal, then you have to think, you also have to believe that Trump is baiting them to do that by continuing to support the vaccine.
If you really think Trump is 10 moves ahead, then that's what he would be doing, is baiting them to come out against the vaccine.
I don't know the answers, but You know, you sort of hate to say it because it's such an ugly situation that I think that's his only way out is to bait him on this deal.
Well, and here's what I could see happening because it would have to go like this.
And Craig, thank you for the call. We've got thinking callers today because it would have to go like this.
And I've thought about doing stuff like this in the past.
It's kind of Machiavelli or a bit of a troll.
But I've thought about doing things in the past.
And I've never done this just because I always want to be straightforward.
It's just the easiest way to go.
And when you do something like this, you have no control over the outcome.
You're kind of making a bet.
You're taking a shot. But basically...
I've thought about doing something where I come out and I make a controversial statement or a controversial stance that is actually completely opposite of what I think or what I feel.
And then I would basically do a video that I would keep to myself saying, hey, I'm about to do this as a test.
I'm about to do this as bait.
I'm about to do this as this. This is how it's going to respond.
This is why I'm doing it. And then come out and make the statement, make the controversial statement, do the controversial thing, watch the media react, watch the spin, everything.
And then on the outset of that, come out and say, okay, here's why I did this.
This was a giant troll.
But the problem with doing that is two things.
One, you have no control over the outcome, and you're hoping it goes the way you think it's going to go.
But two... I just can't do that.
I can't do Deceptive.
I can't do Machiavelli.
I'm just, come on air, straightforward, mind, heart, soul, through the microphone to your ears.
So, I don't do stuff like that.
I don't know Trump might do stuff like that.
You know, he kind of talks about stuff like that in The Art of the Deal.
But I think he's just wrong on this.
I think his ego is wrong on this.
I think he's got friends now in Big Pharma that are yanking his chain as well.
And I think he's just on a losing issue here.
And now DeSantis has all the political leverage over Donald Trump with this vaccine issue.
And you would think if Trump was savvy enough politically, he would realize that at this point, Trump has more support, but DeSantis has the vaccine leverage that can be used against Trump at this point.
I get it. Keep them away from the military psyop, girls.
unidentified
Anyway, so I called in to speak on the correlation of the vaccine with And how Bill Gates, through his massive farming, agricultural land acquisitions here in the United States, who, let's face it, he grows GMOs, right?
I don't hear anyone talking about the correlation of GMO food in tandem with the vaccine.
Now, real quick, I'm a real red pill guy.
I have the X2 and the X3, which I give to my kids.
And they're awesome.
My two-year-old twins are Johnny on the spot, a little ahead of the curve.
And I gotta say, it's due to a lot of the stuff that me and my wife take and we have taken through InfoWars, man.
I love that.
I love to hear that. Yeah, I mean, look.
The best thing for your kids is good, clean products.
Way to go, guys. And you saved the planet from the wind and the sun now.
And water or whatever it is.
Whatever it is y'all are doing.
You've done it now. Congratulations.
What a bunch of psychos.
But that's really the epitome of what they are.
They're destructive. They destroy everything that is beautiful.
They destroy everything that represents humanity.
And ultimately they will destroy civilization if they are successful in their agenda to...
Stop Man made climate change.
Also, we're going to have to get more into this maybe in the weekend coverage, folks.
This story at Town Hall about these gay pedophiles that were adopting children, raping them and pimping them out.
I mean, do you start debating the death penalty for people like this?
I mean, just an absolute nightmare, honestly.
Now you may recall there was a bunch of backlash over a professional hockey player in the NHL refusing to wear the gay jersey.
And so Joel Berry makes this proposal, which is the perfect example.
Let's see the NHL have a Christian night.
And make everyone wear jerseys that say, Christ is Lord, and let's see what happens.
Yeah. Let's see that at the NFL. Let's see that in the NBA. Let's see that in the NHL. Do you think they would have a Christian night?
Think they would have a Christian pride night?
Where they wear a shirt that has Jesus Christ is King on it?
Think they'd do something like that?
By the way, actually, professional sports used to.
And in fact...
I was part of, I was a kid at the time, it was my dad that helped run it with some of his friends, but it was my dad and Albert Pujols and Yadier Molina.
Yes, those, Albert Pujols, Yadier Molina, you know, the future MLB Hall of Famers.
It was my dad with some other people that started a Christian family day.
At Bush Stadium. A Christian family day at Bush Stadium.
And they had a big event afterwards, and it was a big Christian family day, a big successful event.
Oh, you're not allowed to do that now!
And Albert Pools and Yadier Molina would talk about their faith in Christ, and they would read Bible verses and tell you how great God is, and they would save people right there.
But no, you don't do that anymore.
Now you have gay night.
Now you have tranny time.
Yeah, okay, gay pride.
Let's see it. Let's see a Christian pride night.
Let's see if that's allowed.
Now, as I've said, that's probably the original right there that the crew found the video of.
I'm getting a little nostalgic, a little memory here.
I was a part of that. I was literally right next to Albert when he was giving that speech.
Wow, what a cool time. All right, I'm getting, guys, I can't, I'm getting distracted now.
Anyway, but most people in sports actually, I don't know about most, Major League Baseball and football maybe too, these people are not liberal leftist psychos.
They're forced to do this propaganda because they're told you have to do it if you want
to get your paycheck.
But there was a huge event in DC today, and they don't make a big thing of this, obviously.
It used to be a front page story every year.
It's not anymore.
Do you know what it is?
The March for Life happened in Washington, DC.
Now, I used to attend this all the time as a kid, and the last time I tried to attend
it, I got arrested and spent two days in jail.
You know, that old thing.
But Tony Dungy, I don't know if he's already in the Hall of Fame.
He probably will be as a coach.
And a former player, Benjamin Watson, are promoting the March for Life on Twitter.
And so... You know, it's just nice to see that not everybody in the sports media, because both of them are in the media now, that not everybody in sports media has just completely cucked to the liberal left.
So good for Tony Dungy.
I hope others follow his lead.
And don't be ashamed that you're a Christian, and don't be ashamed that you stand up for innocent life.
Because that's what they want to do. They want to bully you into being ashamed of that when you shouldn't.
All right. Oh, and then there was a story in the National Geographic today.
Why your recycling doesn't always get recycled.
And it's not just that your recycling doesn't get recycled.
They've actually done the measurements now.
The energy that it takes to recycle pretty much nullifies the whole process, at least as far as energy is concerned.
Yeah. Anyway, in the National Geographic, it's hilarious.
I think recycling is good.
The concept at least is good.
Can we be better at it? Probably.
But it's just funny. It's the same thing with all these leftist fronts.
It's astroturf. We're recycling!
We're recycling! Look at how great we are!
And then you look at the actual recycling and it basically nullifies itself as far as energy and recycling is concerned.
Alright. We go to the calls the rest of the way.
Let's go to...
Man, we got some interesting calls.
Let's try to keep them quick here.
Let's go to Jim in North Carolina.
Jim, you're on the air. Go ahead.
unidentified
Yeah, Owen, man, I've learned some stuff recently.
I'm going to go ahead and I'm going to have a big announcement next week.
But I'll tell you right now, I'm going to leave here and I'm going to hop on a Twitter space with the Gateway Pundit and Roger Stone and General Flynn at Owen Schroer Live on Twitter.
So look out for that.
I'll be live there in about 30 minutes.
And you have a great weekend and as always, stay classy, InfoWarriors.
Humanity is in a very dangerous position right now.
Powerful corporations using military-grade psychological warfare programs are rolling out a biomedical tyranny worldwide at World ID, a cashless society, a social credit score, a universal basic income, Where every facet of your life is tracked, surveilled, and controlled.
If you think the censorship and surveillance you've seen so far by the deep state and big tech was bad, that is just the opening salvo of their attack.
Humanity and all of our hard-fought liberties and freedoms and all of our safeguards are literally on the edge of a cliff.
But without Infowars on the air, The general public is not going to be aware of the enemy operations.
We didn't just tell you about this whole poison shot rollout first, three years ago, on record.
We're also telling you what's coming next.
We track the enemy. They're preparing new bioweapon releases and new poison mRNA Franken-shots.
Ladies and gentlemen, my family, your family is at the edge of a cliff.
Bill Gates, Klaus Schwab, the UN, the WHO is literally pushing us over into that cashless society hell grid, into that biomedical tyranny that will be even worse than what you see in communist China that is the current main laboratory of this control.
We have to first recognize there is a cliff.
We have to recognize that millions of people have been forced into these deadly shots and pushed over the cliff and died.
Tens of millions more are sick and dying from these poison shots.
Every one of you watching knows someone who took the shot and died or who became deathly ill.
And their own documents show they know this is deadly.
And what do they do? They push and push and push and say, well, it's up to you, but we'll take your rights and freedoms away if you don't take it.
Stand up to the tyrants that think they own your body, that they own my body.