Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| So we've seen over the years a bunch of different examples of how mainstream news is nothing but a bunch of controlled talking points. | ||
| Where you can take local news transmissions from San Francisco and Seattle and New York and Chicago and Florida and Georgia and Missouri and Kansas and Minnesota. | ||
| And it's your local news CBS NBC Fox affiliate. | ||
| With your local teleprompter reading talking head. | ||
| And they're all saying the exact same thing. | ||
| They do it during the election season. | ||
| They do it with big news stories. | ||
| They did it with the vaccines. | ||
| They did it with COVID. We've seen dozens of these examples now. | ||
| And with more people awake than ever. | ||
| And the ability to record and archive this stuff. | ||
| We have these compilations all over the internet. | ||
| But a new one has emerged. | ||
| And of course, Twitter is quickly becoming the most free speech-oriented platform on the internet, all things considered, size, scale, scope, and freedom of speech. | ||
| It is the number one platform when you look at all the metrics. | ||
| And so, of course, the local media is going to be out to attack it. | ||
| Now, before you see this clip, I've explained it before. | ||
| I want to explain it again. | ||
| Most people that you see on local television, your news stations, now I'm not saying they're bad people, they might be great people, but they really have no idea what's going on. | ||
| It's all presentation, the hair, the makeup, the cameras, the lights, the studios, the teleprompters, the cuts, the flashes, the local shots of the ambulances and the traffic stops and everything. | ||
| Most of them have no idea what's really going on in the world. | ||
| Most of them don't have a general idea what planet they even live on. | ||
| They would hop right in line to take 10 COVID vaccines, not knowing any better. | ||
| But they like the prestige. | ||
| They like the local fame that it brings them. | ||
| And so they embrace it. | ||
| They do a good job of it. But most of them have no idea what's going on. | ||
| And that's why you see some local news reporters like Christy Lee or Ivory Hecker leaving the field because they know this isn't real news. | ||
| This is all presentation. | ||
| So here's your presentation from your local news teleprompter reading talking heads, all getting fed the exact same script from the national talking points, which are really from the Democrat Party, telling you to look out for what you see on Twitter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You'll want to be even more cautious when reading about COVID on Twitter. | |
| Be extra cautious when you're looking for health information in the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information in the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information in the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information in the Twitterverse. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking at health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious while you're looking for health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious while looking for health information on Twitter. | ||
| Be extra cautious what you see on the Twitterverse. | ||
| Oh my gosh. | ||
| Are you guys laughing as hysterically as I am at that? | ||
| You see... When I first got into media and I realized how the news really works, I was so turned off by it. | ||
| I mean, this is the only place where I could have possibly worked. | ||
| Folks, you've got to understand, I'm not trying to be rude to these people in that video. | ||
| But I saw how it all worked, and I looked at the people behind the cameras with all the makeup and the hair gel and the stylus and all of it and the hairspray, and I said, that is never going to be me. | ||
| I am never gonna be a stooge that reads off a teleprompter like a ninny | ||
|
unidentified
|
Be cautious of information. | |
| You see, onto it. | ||
| to it. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it is Tuesday, January 10th, 2023. | ||
| It is the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Live, right now on Band.Video. | ||
| And I have to say, I am pleased at what I am seeing. | ||
| In the early stages of the 118th Congress. | ||
| I really am, and I know it's early, but we haven't really seen anything like this before. | ||
| And while I would have liked last night's interview with Matt Gaetz, Lauren Boebert, and Laura Ingram to have gone a little differently, it was reassuring enough, and it was clarifying enough, With some of the actions that we're seeing to make me feel good about the 118th Congress. | ||
| Now, maybe that's just in comparison to what we've had and overall the thing is still pathetic. | ||
| In fact, I've got an argument to make on that today. | ||
| But I am really pleased. | ||
| But then there's the Biden administration. | ||
| And it's up to all of its shenanigans. | ||
| But here's what's amazing. | ||
| And this story continues to play itself out. | ||
| It's... It's video game simulation-esque how this continues to happen. | ||
| What am I talking about? Every single thing that they, the deep state, the Democrats, the fake news media, the Trump haters, every single thing that they accused Donald Trump of, they In this case, Biden is guilty of. | ||
| You cannot make it up. | ||
| It is truly mystical, actually. | ||
| It is like seeing a unicorn, rare. | ||
| What are the odds of this? | ||
| The Russian collusion. | ||
| That was the Clintons. | ||
| Trump classified documents. | ||
| That was Biden. | ||
| Trump bad phone call with Ukraine. | ||
| That was Biden. | ||
| And then all of this new stuff with the Trump taxes and one of Trump's business associates now going to jail. | ||
| Oh yeah, oh Trump! | ||
| Oh it's Trump that is laundering money and cheating with the taxes. | ||
| Oh give me a break. That's almost every member of Congress probably in my life. | ||
| I don't even have the list in front of me. | ||
| I know there's more. Every single thing they've accused Donald Trump of doing that he was innocent of They, the Democrats, have done. | ||
| Between Biden and the Clintons, or one of them, someone in the Democrat Party has done. | ||
| Or is even in the process of doing. | ||
| It's honestly a wonder. | ||
| It's truly mystical. | ||
| And so the classified documents is just the latest and maybe the most ridiculous. | ||
| Because, of course, the media is out covering it up today, telling, oh, nothing to see here. | ||
| But what's the real attitude? | ||
| What's the real approach? What is the real argument that is being made in defense of Joe Biden by the Democrats, by the media? | ||
| It's that, oh... | ||
| It's Joe Biden. | ||
| He's allowed to do it. | ||
| And so what is that really saying? | ||
| You know, when it's them committing the crimes, you know, when it's the deep state, when it's the career politicians, when it's the Clintons and the Bidens or the Bushes or Obama, you know, the kids in the cages. | ||
| When it's, oh, there's another one. Oh, Trump has the kids in cages. | ||
| It was Obama. There's another one. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, you just continue to go on. Trump has kids in cages. | |
| Obama. Trump is sharing nuclear secrets. | ||
| Again, Obama. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clinton. It's mystical. | |
| It's a wonderment. | ||
| But it's like watching the biggest shooting star ever shoot across the sky. | ||
| You can't even believe it's real, and you're watching it Nobody else sees it. | ||
| Nobody else gets it. Nobody else wants to talk about it or look at it. | ||
| So you just say, wow, I guess I get to just watch this shooting star myself. | ||
| Every single thing they've accused Donald Trump of, they've been guilty of. | ||
| And so now the latest. We'll get into the classified documents. | ||
| But this... What Trump did is innocent enough. | ||
| What Biden did with these classified documents actually begs many a question. | ||
| And the media won't answer it, and they'll protect Biden because it's, hey, hey, hey, he's Biden. | ||
| He's a member of the accepted D.C. class. | ||
| Come on. If Trump doesn't, he's not an accepted member of the elite D.C. class. | ||
| We got to go after him. We got to destroy him. | ||
| When Biden does it, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| We don't. Come on. It's Biden. | ||
| It's Uncle Joe. | ||
| That's really what their defense of Biden here is, because they have no other defense. | ||
| He's caught, guilty, red-handed, probably a crime that he committed. | ||
| He wasn't even the president. | ||
| He doesn't have the presidential rights that were established by Judge Amy Berman Jackson when Bill Clinton did it. | ||
| So it wasn't just Biden that took the classified documents. | ||
| At first it was Clinton, which then they set the precedent with Judge Amy Berman Jackson. | ||
| Yes, that Judge Amy Berman Jackson. | ||
| That the president can have any classified materials. | ||
| It's the presidential privilege. | ||
| They did it to protect Bill Clinton's ass. | ||
| Trump knew the law, so he was protected. | ||
| But then they said Trump's not allowed to do it, only Bill Clinton. | ||
| But then see Joe Biden, he wasn't even the president. | ||
| Oh. And they're all concerned with nuclear secrets and Trump. | ||
| Oh, but the Biden documents deal with Iran, who got our drone technology, which has now been given to Russia, that is being used against Ukraine, and directly dealing with Ukraine. | ||
| And I just remember that too. | ||
| Whenever you hear about Iranian drones being used by the Russians, those are our drones that Obama gave the Iranians. | ||
| But don't let that get in the way of a good narrative. | ||
| You know, other news on the good news with the Republicans. | ||
| So we've got a bunch of political news here. | ||
| And then I've got a bunch of geopolitical news here with Russia, Ukraine, just protests happening around the world, continuing in Brazil. | ||
| We'll cover all of that. | ||
| We do have the crime continuing. | ||
| The Davos story, I think this is going to be big. | ||
| But it's just business as usual. | ||
| These are the people that are going to determine how the AI will be integrated with the corporate world government social credit score system so that the entire planet can be treated like slaves. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's just policy. | |
| Like, oh, it's just policy that we're going to make sure that you can't have a gas-powered stove anymore. | ||
| It's just policy. | ||
| It's just policy that you won't be able to buy or sell without the microchip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Or the vaccine. | |
| It's just policy. | ||
| And they'll be setting that policy at Davos. | ||
| So we've got that, some other vaccine news. | ||
| And some other news today. | ||
| And who knows? The way things develop, there could be a breaking news story before we're off the air. | ||
| Now, ladies and gentlemen, I want to tell you this, and I'm telling myself this because I had to open a new A new batch of Vitamin Mineral Fusion today at my house. | ||
| And so I'm running low. | ||
| But it's not just me running low. | ||
| The store is running low on Vitamin Mineral Fusion. | ||
| So I'm gonna be making a big purchase to make sure that I've got a good stock of vitamin mineral fusion | ||
| if and when it sells out in the near future. | ||
| And so because of the low stock, we are gonna be soon ending the 50% off special | ||
| on vitamin mineral fusion. | ||
| We might sell out before it ends, but that's where it's at right now. | ||
| So I'm gonna be making sure to be stocking up on vitamin mineral fusion because I start every morning | ||
| with vitamin mineral fusion. | ||
| And I'm gonna make sure that that trend continues as I'm starting to run low. | ||
| But if you're like me, I'm going to be making a big purchase and stocking up on Vitamin Mineral Fusion while it's 50% off and in stock so that I'm not out of it when we're out of stock at the store like we've been on so many other things. | ||
| Like the Real Red Pill Plus, which is finally back in stock. | ||
| And of course, selling out fast. | ||
| 50% off at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And of course, it's always your support at InfoWarsStore.com that keeps us on the air. | ||
| Alright, we're going to get into this political news when we come back from this short break. | ||
| Hey everyone, we are back in session here in Washington, D.C. and I'm about to cast my vote for our very first bill this Congress. | ||
| It's two pages, not thousands. | ||
| It has one subject and zero earmarks. | ||
| Oh, and it'll help stop the harassment of the American citizens by prohibiting those 87,000 IRS agents from ever even being hired. | ||
| That's conservative governance at its finest. | ||
| More freedom, less government, and we are just getting started. | ||
| Thank goodness Lauren Boebert squeaked through in the midterm elections to be in there. | ||
| Really like what she's doing. | ||
| And really like the updates that she's constantly giving on her Twitter account. | ||
| Thank you Elon Musk for keeping it free because if Elon Musk didn't purchase it, Lauren Boebert would probably be banned. | ||
| Probably would have received that old Democrat Party ban. | ||
| But there she is, telling us what's going on in D.C. And we appreciate her for it. | ||
| But let's look at some of what else is going on here. | ||
| Texas Republicans file articles of impeachment against Mayorkas. | ||
| A Texas Republican has filed articles of impeachment against Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, wasting little time in the new Congress to act on a GOP priority. | ||
| Leadership has said would come after thorough investigation. | ||
| And so... | ||
| This was one of the big issues. | ||
| They talked about it last night, Gates and Boebert on Ingram, that they got McCarthy to concede on. | ||
| And I have to say, they really did win this battle. | ||
| They got the one vote measure to oust the Speaker. | ||
| They get the vote on term limits. | ||
| They got a commitment to border security. | ||
| They got a commitment to no more omnibus bills. | ||
| And so the Senate can't even, the House won't even hear it if it doesn't abide by the latest rules. | ||
| So McConnell can't lobby for these massive bills and leverage whatever power he has in D.C. So they got some good concessions. | ||
| And like I said, I was a McCarthy. | ||
| I was basically a never McCarthy, but alright, he got in. | ||
| He got the votes. I liked his speech. | ||
| I'm willing to give it a shot. | ||
| We'll see. We'll be critical. We'll be watching. | ||
| But this has been a good start. | ||
| Impeach Mayorkas. Now, ultimately, you've got to impeach Biden. | ||
| If you want to do anything about the border. | ||
| But that's not even... What do you even impeach Biden on? | ||
| There's a list. | ||
| There's options there. | ||
| So I guess this isn't the angle to go after Biden. | ||
| And you go and you impeach Mayorkas instead. | ||
| It's a disaster down there. | ||
| And then you have Biden down there. | ||
| And there's like a war raging between the Mexican drug cartels and the government. | ||
| Just an all-out war. Biden's down there parading around with Justin Trudeau. | ||
| He's going to do something about the border. | ||
| No, he's down there for a photo op. | ||
| He's down there with a 40-car convoy telling you to save the planet by stopping driving your vehicle, your gas-powered vehicle, while he's got a nice convoy down there. | ||
| So, articles of impeachment introduced against Mayorkas. | ||
| Folks, I'm telling you, the way I think the Republicans are actually strategically putting bold leadership In positions of influence and power in DC to actually get stuff done, like impeaching Mayorkas. | ||
| Now, I don't know if anything will come of it, but there's action there. | ||
| There's a desire there. | ||
| Here's Claudia Tenia, another one of the good ones, from New York. | ||
| With a GOP majority in the House, this year is our chance to truly fight back and demand election integrity for all citizens in our nation. | ||
| As co-chair of the Election Integrity Caucus, that is going to be my focus every day. | ||
| Claudia Tenney, focusing on the issue of election integrity. | ||
| We'll be watching that closely. | ||
| But again, this has never even been an issue that the Republicans make. | ||
| You don't see any Republican leadership ever putting this at the front and saying we're going to deal with it. | ||
| Claudia Tenney, representative from New York, is with the Election Integrity Caucus. | ||
| More good signs coming out of the 118th Congress. | ||
| Even McCarthy is showing signs of a pulse. | ||
| Do we have to take McCarthy off our radar? | ||
| When we would be searching for McConnell and McCarthy for a heart rate, for a pulse? | ||
| Have we found one? | ||
| Have we found? I think, folks, I think we might have to take McCarthy off the radar here. | ||
| I think we've found one. I think we have located a pulse. | ||
| Now, McConnell and McDaniel maybe still need to remain. | ||
| We might have a pulse. | ||
| I think I'm sensing life from McCarthy. | ||
| Me, I thought I almost declared him dead on the table politically. | ||
| I'm sensing life! | ||
| Speaker McCarthy moves to remove Eric Swalwell and Adam Schiff and Ilhan Omar from congressional committees. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm starting to like what I see here. | |
| A pulse! Signs of life! | ||
| I don't even believe it! | ||
| Eric Swalwell had a relationship with a Chinese spy. | ||
| Ilhan Omar broke federal immigration laws marrying her brother. | ||
| Adam Schiff is a serial liar and a favorite of the far-left Democrats who still has yet to produce the evidence he claims he has proving Russian collusion. | ||
| Why are you holding on to that evidence, Adam Schiff? | ||
| He doesn't have any evidence. | ||
| Signs of life from McCarthy. | ||
| I tell you what. We're not going to completely take him off the radar yet. | ||
| But, not going to completely take him off the radar yet. | ||
| But if I see more signs of life out of Kevin McCarthy, we will take him off of our sonar radar and it'll just be McConnell and McDaniel after that. | ||
| Because this is a sign of life. | ||
| You gotta like that from Kevin McCarthy. | ||
| Trump waves in. Trump says Adam Schiff should be prosecuted for the damage he has done to our country. | ||
| That pencil neck. Yeah, where is the Russian clues and evidence, Schiff? | ||
| Why do you refuse to show us the evidence, Adam? | ||
| You claimed you had it. | ||
| During the House hearings, you claimed you had the evidence. | ||
| Where is it? Probably where the sun don't shine is where you stuck it. | ||
| Gates introduced his amendment to bring C-SPAN cameras back to the House floor. | ||
| A little more transparency in government. | ||
| Plus, C-SPAN ratings got to be hitting all-time highs right now. | ||
| There's got to be... | ||
| C-SPAN has to be enjoying this. | ||
| Now, you heard Lauren Boebert... | ||
| You heard Lauren Boebert on the issue of the IRS, and there's some other news here. | ||
| House Republicans to vote on bill abolishing IRS, eliminating income tax. | ||
| So this is a little misleading. | ||
| They are voting to stop the hiring of the 87,000 agents. | ||
| And I do believe that's going to win. | ||
| I don't see how that doesn't win. | ||
| Even Democrats should get behind that. | ||
| In fact, they already voted on it, actually. | ||
| I apologize. I've got it. They already voted on it. | ||
| Every Democrat... Voted to uphold the IRS hiring 87,000 agents. | ||
| Every Democrat. Every Democrat wants more IRS agents coming after you. | ||
| By the way, they've done the research. | ||
| IRS agents are 800 times more likely to be audited by an IRS agent if you're in a red state. | ||
| It's clearly targeting conservatives, but it didn't really abolish the IRS, but it's basically trying to rewrite the tax law. | ||
| It's called the Fair Tax Act, and so basically it'll just legislate the IRS out of necessity. | ||
| There'll just be nothing they can do anymore. | ||
| So they are going to get rid of the $87,000, and they could basically neuter the IRS with this new tax bill that I think, I don't think it's perfect, but it's better than what we got. | ||
| So I may need some help with this from the crew or maybe the callers later on. | ||
| I'm coming up with a list. | ||
| It's this mystical phenomenon that we're experiencing. | ||
| We're everything the Democrats, the mainstream media, accused Donald Trump of. | ||
| It's the Democrats that are actually guilty of Obama, Clinton, and Biden. | ||
| And I was trying to come up with just a short list here, this mystical list. | ||
| Secret documents. It wasn't Trump, it was the Clintons and Obama. | ||
| Or excuse me, it was Clinton and Biden when he was vice president for Obama. | ||
| The quid pro quo with Ukraine, they tried to impeach Trump over. | ||
| That was actually Biden in front of the Council on Foreign Relations. | ||
| We have the videos. Russian collusion, we find out that was Clinton. | ||
| Paying for the Russian dossier. | ||
| All of it. The kids... | ||
| Really, Russian collusion, you can go with Biden, too, with his deals with former Moscow mayors and such. | ||
| But we'll just stick with Clinton for this. | ||
| Kids in cages. They said it was Trump. | ||
| Kids in cages. That was actually Obama. | ||
| They would even share images and videos of kids in cages from Obama's years in office and say, look, Trump has the kids in cages. | ||
| And it was from Obama's years in office, not Trump's. | ||
| That's the short list here. | ||
| I might need some help from the crew or maybe the listeners will take calls because I do believe there's more. | ||
| I do believe the tale to this mystical political shooting star known as everything they accused Trump of, they're guilty of. | ||
| I believe there's more on that list. | ||
| But now it's the documents. And so they're all in a tizzy to cover this story up. | ||
| Now when it was Trump with the secret documents, it was the biggest story in television for like a month. | ||
| For about a month, this was their top story. | ||
| And drawing it out and dragging it out and camera crews at Mar-a-Lago and the raid and all the drama and the sensationalizing. | ||
| And all of it, of course, was legal. | ||
| Trump had the right as president with a precedent set by Judge Amy Berman Jackson to protect Bill Clinton when he took classified documents. | ||
| And the judge at the time, it's Democrat Judge Amy Berman Jackson, we know her well now, famous for the Roger Stone case. | ||
| They had to protect Bill for the documents, so Judge Jackson said, no, the president, nothing is classified for the president, which maybe she gets that one right. | ||
| Nothing is classified for the president. | ||
| It's the president. | ||
| So Clinton having the documents is perfectly fine. | ||
| He was the president. But that same logic and legal precedent, more importantly, didn't apply to Donald Trump in their eyes. | ||
| And so it was the biggest story ever, even though it was already par for the course and a precedent there. | ||
| And it makes you wonder, is it really this mystical thing we're experiencing in this crazy, crazy simulation called life that we're witnessing right now, that we're a part of right now? | ||
| Or is Trump that much of a political genius that he would set them up for this? | ||
| I mean, he's not even in control of what they're doing, or maybe somehow he is. | ||
| The whole thing is just insane. | ||
| But so, oh, they're having their compare and contrast on CNN and MSNBC. Oh, here's Trump's documents. | ||
| Here's Biden's documents. And they're making it look like, oh, Biden's documents are no big deal. | ||
| Nothing to see here. Except the difference is, Biden was not the president. | ||
| Biden does not have protection under law to have the documents. | ||
| There are no precedents set in court cases where the vice president gets to take presidential classified documents. | ||
| So all the compares and contrasts they make are irrelevant. | ||
| Trump was president. Biden was not. | ||
| But it doesn't matter. | ||
| Their job is to protect Joe Biden. | ||
| And so they'll do a whole thing probably on 60 Minutes this week defending Joe Biden and making the big thing about Trump again. | ||
| But it's just like Leslie Stahl. | ||
| These people are so arrogant. | ||
| These people are so belligerent in their will. | ||
| To dominate you. | ||
| The President of the United States gets interviewed by 60 Minutes and says, well, remember I got spied on by Obama and Leslie Stahl says, no, you didn't. | ||
| No, you didn't. | ||
| No real evidence exists. | ||
| You're talking to the President! | ||
| You whacked out woman! | ||
| So you watch. They'll do some gambit. | ||
| They'll do it all week saying, oh, Biden is, oh, no big deal. | ||
| They might even have to come out and admit what Biden did was illegal maybe. | ||
| But they'll just say, hey, it's Biden. | ||
| It's okay. Hey, he's Joe Biden. | ||
| It's okay. It's not Donald Trump. | ||
| It's okay when Biden does it. | ||
| And they'll just expect you to accept that. | ||
| Or they'll try to make it like, oh, it's no big deal. | ||
| It was only a handful of documents. | ||
| But what's the real story? | ||
| Why did Biden have the documents? | ||
| Why was he storing them at a Pennsylvania office? | ||
| Was it incompetence and recklessness? | ||
| Or was there some sort of motive for that? | ||
| Don't expect these questions to be asked or answered in the mainstream media. | ||
| They'll somehow make it about Trump again. | ||
| Justice Department is examining small number. | ||
| Oh, there it is. Small number of classified documents found at Biden think tank. | ||
| Small number. | ||
| See, it's a small number. | ||
| Well, it can be a big or small number. | ||
| He was never the president. | ||
| Trump was. Top secret intelligence documents related to Ukraine and Iran found in Biden's private office. | ||
| Now that's the significance. | ||
| We all know about Joe Biden's deals in Ukraine and the quid pro quo and all the other corruption going on in Ukraine. | ||
| Joe Biden and the Biden crime family have been involved with corruption in Ukraine for over a decade. | ||
| Is that why Joe Biden had documents relating to Ukraine? | ||
| And then the Iran issue. | ||
| That's a whole other curious issue. | ||
| Dare I say, I'm going to go out on a crazy limb here and go out on a conspiracy theory. | ||
| Because I'm just trying to figure out. | ||
| Biden having Ukraine documents, that one seems rather obvious. | ||
| He's got interest in Ukraine. | ||
| We all know about his statements at the Council on Foreign Relations. | ||
| And they're still doing business in Ukraine. | ||
| So, the Ukraine stuff, again, sits. | ||
| But the Iran stuff, why? | ||
| What interest would Joe Biden have? | ||
| Say, risking it all. | ||
| To take classified documents... | ||
| About Iran or with communications with Iran, why? | ||
| Why would he have that? | ||
| I get the Ukraine, but Iran, I'm trying to figure this out. | ||
| So my conspiracy theory, as far out on a limb as I may be going here, would Joe Biden take classified documents to blackmail Barack Obama? | ||
| We all know about what Obama was doing in Iran. | ||
| The cash payments, the weapons transfers, the drone technology. | ||
| Would Biden have taken blackmail on Obama? | ||
| That's my conspiracy theory. | ||
| The Ukraine documents seem obvious, but why the Iran stuff? | ||
| Don't ask the media to ask or answer these questions. | ||
| Intel memos on Iran and Ukraine among documents found at Biden's office. | ||
| China upped its donations to the Biden Center That's the one where they found the documents. | ||
| 400% with a $50 million donation after Biden announced his campaign. | ||
| Bought and paid for. | ||
| Joe Biden. A joke. | ||
| A clown. A crook. | ||
| A criminal. Making our country a laughing stock. | ||
| A scratching pull. | ||
| But see, it's all good when it's Joe. | ||
| It's all good. | ||
| The media will protect Joe. | ||
| But oh, look at the scrutiny. | ||
| Donald Trump continues to be under. | ||
| Georgia's special grand jury ends probe of Trump in 2020 election. | ||
| And they were trying to pin crimes on Trump. | ||
| To say he couldn't run for office again, that he incited a riot, it failed. | ||
| A grand jury in Atlanta that has been investigating whether then-President Trump and his allies committed any crimes while trying to overturn the 2020 election loss in Georgia has finished its work. | ||
| No charges against Trump and others. | ||
| Yeah, no kidding. It was all political. | ||
| And then they know it's political, they know it's fake, and then they say, ooh, Trump's under investigation. | ||
| So they get behind closed doors and they scheme on how they can make Trump look bad. | ||
| And they say, I know. Let's launch a probe in Atlanta. | ||
| And we'll run headlines saying he's under probe for crimes. | ||
| And then the whole public perception is Trump's a criminal, but then it's them, the criminals, running the gambit, making you think he's a criminal. | ||
| So he gets the scrutiny. | ||
| Ex-Trump Organization CFO Alan Weisenberg sent to Rikers Island for tax fraud. | ||
| Folks, this is... Look, honestly, this is not even tax fraud. | ||
| This is so ridiculous. | ||
| So they're claiming he dodged $1.7 million, not in payments received, | ||
| but in quote unquote company perks. | ||
| So, oh, you had access to an apartment in Trump Tower. | ||
| Oh, you had access to a vehicle that was owned by Trump and it was valued at $1.7 million | ||
| for the time you're using it. | ||
| And this is such bogus. | ||
| It's clearly political And none of this should be even going on. | ||
| If you or a business or anybody owns a building or owns an apartment or a car and you want to let somebody use it for any purpose, you should be allowed to do that and the government should go F off. | ||
| You know, I like Ron Paul's response to all of this. | ||
| Trump's tax returns show the evil of the income tax. | ||
| That should be the unified cry of the American people. | ||
| Sadly, we're divided. A house divided surely will fall apart. | ||
| And so instead of all of us, we the people, despite our differences, we can't even rise up and cry out together, stop stealing my money, stop financially raping me, stop making me work for interests and people and wars that I have no business being involved in or desire being involved in. | ||
| No, we don't get that unification. | ||
| We don't get that clarion call. | ||
| Instead, every single Democrat voted to expand the IRS powers and the tax powers against the American people, which is, of course, just weaponized government. | ||
| Just look what they did to Trump's business partner, CFO Allen Weisselberg. | ||
| And I'm watching all the response to the liberals on this, and it's just amazing how ignorant and stupid people are every time. | ||
| They're saying, this is ridiculous. | ||
| He should be going to jail for longer. | ||
| It's white privilege. | ||
| Look at Wesley Snipes. | ||
| Look at Al Sharpton. | ||
| That's not even the point. | ||
| They don't even know why Weisselberg is being charged with tax evasion. | ||
| They just assume, oh look, he's white. | ||
| He was stealing money. When it's not the story. | ||
| They don't know the story. | ||
| Again, it's like whether you hate Trump, love Trump, hate white people, love white people, do you really want the government to come after you? | ||
| Do you really want the government to be coming after you saying, you owe me money? | ||
| Give me that money or go to jail? | ||
| You really want that? | ||
| How about this? I don't pay taxes. | ||
| You don't pay taxes. You get to keep more money. | ||
| I get to keep more money. But why does the left always, at the end of the day, always end up supporting higher taxes and bigger government? | ||
| Because how else are they going to control your life? | ||
| How does a leftist have the means and resources to control your life? | ||
| Individually, it doesn't. | ||
| But with the power of government and bureaucracy, it can dominate you. | ||
| And that's what the left is all about. | ||
| And historically speaking, always ends up being authoritarian and totalitarian. | ||
| So sadly, we can't all, as Americans say, stop taxing us, let us keep our money. | ||
| No, the left again cries for bigger government, bigger government control, more weaponized government because they believe they will seize that power. | ||
| And they know that they have the genuine desire to To take that power and use it to their advantage and their will, where conservatives don't. | ||
| We don't like the power of government. | ||
| We know how dangerous it is. | ||
| We know how it can be used against us, and so we don't want to use it against our enemies. | ||
| Complete opposite on the left side. | ||
| But I'm digressing. Ron Paul's response to this was right. | ||
| It's the evil of the tax period that should be the story from Trump's tax returns. | ||
| Now, I'd love to see the IRS outrightly abolished as Ted Cruz and others have called for. | ||
| But the new tax bill being proposed would basically neuter it. | ||
| But the Democrats are trying to expand the IRS's power and expand the taxation on you while you actually have legitimate movements in the Republican Party to try to slash taxes and get rid of the IRS power. | ||
| Like, who doesn't want that? | ||
| I just, I don't get it. | ||
| Forget about the politicians. | ||
| If I'm walking around, I don't know, you're a Democrat, you're a Republican, I'm just walking around the street, I ask 100 people, do you like taxes? | ||
| Who actually says yes? | ||
| Do you want more taxes or less taxes? | ||
| Who would actually say more? | ||
| And I've actually done this experiment. | ||
| I've actually gone to Democrat rallies and done this experiment. | ||
| And they, and see... | ||
| They know now when they get a microphone put in front of their face to not say anything too hastily because they've fallen into the gotcha trap too many times. | ||
| So now when I go around to leftist events, I'm like, hey, do you like more taxes? | ||
| Or, hey, do you like big government? They have to be like, well... | ||
| Because if they're being honest, no, they don't like big government, no, they don't like more taxes, but they can't be honest because all their policies and all the things they push for and all the things they promote and all the things they try to ram down your throat are all the exact opposite of less government. | ||
| So they can't come out and say, oh, I'm for less government, because then you would say, really, because you support all these big government policies, that'd be the gotcha moment. | ||
| So they say, well, it depends. | ||
| No, you don't like big government. | ||
| You like big government as a tool against your opposition. | ||
| That's your modern-day leftist. | ||
| But here you go. More of the double standard. | ||
| So, the Biden administration is weighing a nationwide ban on gas stoves. | ||
| Look, I'm going to be honest. | ||
| I've seen the studies, and there's more than one study, quite frankly. | ||
| The one study they're using was probably politicized and bought and paid for, but there's a bunch of studies. | ||
| And look, I'd say that there's some evidence out there that a gas stove can lead to health problems. | ||
| And if you think about it, I mean, I don't think it's that surprising. | ||
| You're talking about a flammable gas being essentially leaked into your home. | ||
| I mean, you're lighting it on fire. | ||
| And so, yeah, I mean, that gets into your house's air quality. | ||
| And, you know, it could probably cause some problems. | ||
| Are they sensationalizing it? | ||
| Are they making it sound worse than it could be? | ||
| Is it all about political power and shutting down your access to cheap and accessible natural gas? | ||
| Absolutely 100%. | ||
| But there's probably a real thing there. | ||
| There's probably a real health issue. | ||
| I mean, I'm sure breathing in that is not good for you. | ||
| Probably not good for your air quality in the house. | ||
| But hey, having said that and admitting that, we all know what this is really about. | ||
| This isn't about... They don't give a... | ||
| Oh yeah, the government wants you to be healthy. | ||
| Give me a break. They tell you not to eat steak and eggs. | ||
| They tell you to be vegan. | ||
| They tell you to eat bugs. | ||
| So no, this isn't the government caring about your health and safety. | ||
| They make you take an experimental injection that's neither healthy or safe. | ||
| So it's not about health. | ||
| So when they pretend, oh, it causes asthma and all the allergies and stuff, oh. | ||
| Yeah, there might be some problems there with the natural gas stove. | ||
| It's probably very minor, but I'm sure there's something. | ||
| Other studies have proven it. | ||
| They've done studies on... The air quality in the house with the natural gas stove versus electric stove. | ||
| There's something there. | ||
| I'm not going to deny that. And if they want to point that out as a problem and say make a choice and culture and civilization decides to move on, then fine. | ||
| I don't think that would be the case. I think the benefits still outweigh the costs. | ||
| But of course, it's all about stopping the natural gas from going to your home. | ||
| The cheapest, easiest way for you to heat your home. | ||
| The cheapest, easiest way for you to heat food if you need to. | ||
| So of course they've got to stop that. | ||
| Of course they want to stop putting that into our infrastructure. | ||
| That's what it's all about. | ||
| Cutting you off from all these really advanced technologies. | ||
| Having the natural gas easily, cheaply accessible in your home. | ||
| That's what it's all about. | ||
| And there's already some precedent for this. | ||
| Where they've basically done something similar, the halogen and incandescent light bulb ban explained, where they don't ban, you can still have one or buy one, you just can't make one. | ||
| And so there's debate about that too. | ||
| I'm not going to get into the light bulb issue, but there's debate about that too. | ||
| But it's all precedent. It's all precedent for the government to say what you can and can't have in your house. | ||
| And of course, we ultimately know where this goes. | ||
| Eventually, you don't have any decisions. | ||
| You don't get to decide any of the stuff that goes in your house. | ||
| The furniture, the plumbing, the energy units, nothing. | ||
| Big corporate world government decides everything for you. | ||
| What you eat, how you heat your house, how you light your house, or if you'll even be able to eat, heat, or light your house. | ||
| But of course, as they're weighing the ban on natural gas stoves, better for cooking, I would say, The Bidens, well, they've got the gas stove in their house. | ||
| Isn't it just nice? | ||
| Isn't it just nice? | ||
| The Bidens are going to... | ||
| They'll probably do it. | ||
| They'll probably ban the manufacturing of gas stoves starting in 2024. | ||
| But they've got a nice gas stove in their home. | ||
| Isn't that nice? | ||
| Isn't that nice? | ||
| And as... | ||
| What is she doing with it? | ||
| I mean, is she cooking... | ||
| Spinach on an open stove top with no oil or butter or anything? | ||
| Is this sickening what I'm seeing on the screen right here? | ||
| What a freak show. | ||
| But that's not the only double standard in the Biden household. | ||
| The Biden administration is openly removing the wall from the southern border and directly taking the equipment. | ||
| The Biden administration is directly taking the tools and the equipment and the infrastructure | ||
| from the southern border wall and they're putting it around Joe Biden's beachfront mansion | ||
| in Delaware. | ||
| All right, I'm kidding. | ||
| But they are taking down the wall at the southern border and they are building one up around | ||
| Joe Biden's beachfront mansion. | ||
| Now you say, well, they already had a wall. | ||
| Folks, that wall was temporary. | ||
| They're building a permanent wall. | ||
| We're talking wall of China level. | ||
| Joe Biden gets a nice big, beautiful wall. | ||
| Your southern border is wide open for criminals and drugs to pour in. | ||
| Well, you might not be surprised by this, but. | ||
| you It certainly is concerning. | ||
| Members of Congress rank only above telemarketers in poll on ethics and honesty. | ||
| In other words, actually when you dig down deeper to the numbers, I think that | ||
| the numbers actually show that members of Congress are actually | ||
| trusted less than telemarketers. Of Paltry, 2% say the ethical standards of | ||
| their elected representatives are very high. 2% very high ethical standards, say | ||
| Americans. Only 2% of Americans say our representatives have a very high | ||
| ethical standard. That's probably too high of a number. | ||
| Maybe 1%. And 7% say they are high according to a Gallup poll. | ||
| It also found that 62% say their lawmakers have honesty and ethics problems. | ||
| So the majority, the vast majority of Americans don't trust the lawmakers at all. | ||
| 37% saying their standards are low. | ||
| 25% saying very low. | ||
| So 25% of Americans think that the ethics standards for members of Congress are very low. | ||
| So you have to ask yourself, how... | ||
| In the hell do people like Nancy Pelosi continue to get elected with numbers like this? | ||
| Nobody likes them, nobody trusts them, and then they just continue to win. | ||
| How is incumbency such a strong booster in a campaign when nobody trusts politicians? | ||
| Maybe it's because of voter apathy, or maybe it's because of something else. | ||
| But it doesn't make sense. So I think when you look at all the numbers, members of Congress are trusted actually less than telemarketers. | ||
| Because 6% of Americans say telemarketers have very high ethical standards. | ||
| Only 2% of Americans say that about politicians. | ||
| But here is a politician, here is an elected member of Congress that you can trust. | ||
| I think one of the most underrated, and that is Thomas Massey, talking about the new committee that I love to see, Trying to push back against the weaponization of government. | ||
| Here's Thomas Massey, one of the good guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The gentleman from Massachusetts Reserve. | |
| The gentleman from Oklahoma is recognized. | ||
| Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I yield two minutes to my very good friend. | ||
| The gentleman from Kentucky, Mr. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Massey. The gentleman from Kentucky is recognized for two minutes. | |
| I thank the gentleman from Oklahoma. | ||
| The very words expressed by those opposed to this committee demonstrate the dire need for this committee. | ||
| We've gone four years without oversight. | ||
| And to quote Shakespeare, the lady doth protest too much, methinks. | ||
| Those who argue against transparency may have something to hide. | ||
| So I listened very closely when I heard the former chairman of the Intelligence Committee give the reason that maybe we shouldn't ask for this information from the intelligence community. | ||
| He said the intelligence community, after this committee, may be reluctant to share information with Congress, that Congress needs to craft legislation. | ||
| I would suggest if they are reluctant, they are disqualified from holding these positions. | ||
| If they have grown so big that they are no longer accountable to the branch of government that created them, that funds them, and it is responsible for their oversight, then they need to be hemmed in. | ||
| I implore my colleagues on the other side of the aisle to populate this committee with serious Democrats. | ||
| I know there are some over there. | ||
| I've worked with them. We've co-sponsored amendments on privacy over the past decade. | ||
| Some of them have passed. | ||
| Please populate it with serious members. | ||
| Please, to my colleagues on this side of the aisle, give us the resources we need to do this job. | ||
| And if I may rebut one thing that's been said on the other side of the aisle about ongoing criminal investigations, he says it's unprecedented that Congress would engage in an investigation that involves an ongoing criminal investigation. | ||
| What was the January 6th committee? | ||
| This is not unprecedented. | ||
| It's what you've wasted millions of dollars on over the past two years. | ||
| I urge adoption of this rule and support for the committee that it will create. | ||
| Now yield back the balance of my time. | ||
| Gentlemen, folks, I'm here to tell you, common sense, care, concern, and conservatism has returned to the Republican Party. | ||
| It really has. It hasn't completely taken it over, but it has returned and it is growing. | ||
| There's none of it on the Democrat side of the aisle. | ||
| And that's why people with high-profile, typical liberals and Democrats like Elon Musk, Joe Rogan, and others are coming out saying, I'm done with Democrats and liberals. | ||
| I'm voting Republican. Because there's some common sense here. | ||
| We're now in hour number two of the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And I want to go back in time to a story that generated a lot of interest at the time. | ||
| Really two stories that generated a lot of interest at the time that seemed to be coming together And it's Natalie Denise doing the groundwork on this issue, and that is the deaths of musicians Chris Cornell and Chester Bennington. | ||
| And so Natalie, as I said, has done the groundwork on this and is really getting into the weeds of this | ||
| in some recent reporting and digging that she's done. | ||
| And so Natalie, I want you to kind of lay out what you have concluded from this, | ||
| because really there were a bunch of questions, maybe even assumptions, | ||
| but conclusions were never really reached. | ||
| It was kind of just some stuff sitting out there in the fog of it. | ||
| And so I want to introduce it with what my introduction to these stories were with the interest, | ||
| because I imagine that was most people. | ||
| With Chester Bennington, this one was interesting, but there were the rumors | ||
| that he was the son of John Podesta, essentially the estranged son of John Podesta. | ||
| People looked at Chester Bennington's history with the history of abuse as a child coming up through foster homes and then, of course, a spitting image of John Podesta. | ||
| If it's just coincidence, it is still the case. | ||
| And then with Chris Cornell... | ||
| The mysterious death where it was rumored that he was working on a documentary to highlight the issue of human trafficking and specifically child sex trafficking. | ||
| But it all was kind of hazy and foggy. | ||
| No conclusions were really reached. | ||
| But you've done some digging in recent weeks. | ||
| And have you reached any conclusions, Natalie? | ||
| Nothing concretely conclusive, to be fair. | ||
| So I think most of this has really reached a goal of laying everything out on the table. | ||
| What I can conclude is that, in my personal opinion, I think that these facts were maybe underreported or just plain old shorted as far as any investigation goes. | ||
| But what I can say is that From the initial theory that we all kind of believed with the silent children, this is just my personal opinion, but I think it was a bit of a distraction to look here and not there. | ||
| And the silent children, what is that exactly? | ||
| What is the silent children? | ||
| So, The Silent Children is a documentary documenting the horrors of child trafficking, child sex trafficking in various countries. | ||
| And this was headed by a nonprofit at the time called Traffic Jam, which was headed by Paul Myhill. | ||
| So, you know, as you probably have heard the theory, it was in It was implied that Chris Cornell and Chester Bennington were somehow part of this documentary. | ||
| So that's what intrigued me to look into it. | ||
| But you think that was a distraction now? | ||
| Well, I personally do. | ||
| Now, here's the thing. I can't 100% debunk the theory. | ||
| It's just that there are certain avenues in my investigation that have a lot of dead ends, including outreaching to those that are in charge of the account that put out the theory or the idea in the first place They have a 12-page document in which they only release two pages of, and they won't release the rest by their reasoning of it being that they are under strict confidence to not release it. | ||
| You know, it's funny because it's headlines like this on the screen that make people doubt with all the lies we've been told. | ||
| It says here, Avicii, Bennington, Cornell, and Bourdain were not working on a child sex trafficking documentary and did take their own lives. | ||
| Oh, you're going to just tell me that as if I'm not allowed to ask questions while all of a sudden I'm a little more curious. | ||
| And people did have questions about the Avicii thing. | ||
| I know he was going through his own problems. | ||
| And then the Bourdain issue, there were questions of that too. | ||
| But your investigation is focused on Cornell and Bennington. | ||
| So do you think there's anything there that would lead to what might be called mysterious circumstances in their death? | ||
| Because that's what people were concerned about with these two great musicians. | ||
| One hundred percent. | ||
| You know, I've started off with the theory. | ||
| I wanted to just examine that first. | ||
| But I did already do a series on Chris Cornell. | ||
| I evaluated some of the timelines and some of the things that were reported within the police investigation. | ||
| And I will say that a lot of it just does not add up. | ||
| So is the latter piece a mystery? | ||
| Absolutely. I think that there are a lot more questions that I have than I do have answers. | ||
| However, you know, I think the first step is for all of us to illustrate all of this, put it on the table. | ||
| What do we concretely know? | ||
| Even if the facts and the things that were reported on the, you know, officially don't make sense, let's examine what doesn't make sense and go from there. | ||
| Now, the stories kind of just disappeared. | ||
| I mean, there was interest in them for, you know, a little bit after the deaths happened and people were looking at it, and then it kind of went away. | ||
| Why did you feel motivated to reinvestigate this stuff? | ||
| Yeah, I feel that the Truther movement, you know, we've had such a sense of, you know, disengaging with mainstream media, which is fair, right? | ||
| So we have essentially believed influencers and those out there, those personalities, to food feed us information. | ||
| And unfortunately, that does come with a strand of things that are infiltrated, maybe theories or things that are kind of, you know— A little bit twisted from the truth, right? | ||
| And so I think that it's fair to re-examine this and, you know, look at it from a concrete perspective. | ||
| Nothing that a personality or an account fed me, but from, like, critical analysis. | ||
| And I think that we ought to treat all of our information that way. | ||
| We need to look into it a second or third time and cross-analyze these things that are telling, you know, that maybe a personality or an account is telling us to believe in one certain way. | ||
| So that's what got me looking into it, is just looking at my facts and the information that I've fed more concretely as we should with everything. | ||
| So, are you continuing to investigate this? | ||
| Do you have more questions? Or are there any... | ||
| Have you reached, say, a dead end or any conclusions with this? | ||
| I've definitely reached a lot of dead ends to it. | ||
| However, with the information that I have recovered, for instance, with Chris Cornell, there's a series on my YouTube, for instance. | ||
| Anybody can go watch that five-part series and come out with a lot more questions that are not necessarily on the foundation of the silent children theory, which is the goal, right? | ||
| So I definitely have a lot more questions that I would love to get answered. | ||
| However, you know, I think that there's a lot more to uncover with Chester Bennington's piece, which I'm working on at this very moment. | ||
| But I think that, you know, redirecting our eyes to look a certain way versus what we were told is probably the better avenue. | ||
| Is anybody else still interested in this? | ||
| Because, I mean, again, at the time, there were a lot of internet slews talking about this and making this a big issue. | ||
| I didn't see about it or hear about it for years until I started seeing your coverage again. | ||
| Is there any interest left there or are you kind of out on an island? | ||
| I think people are so married and devoted to the theory, and that's what they are willing to write on. | ||
| And so my concentration is to break at least a few people away from it. | ||
| There definitely isn't a lot more interest that there was maybe a couple years ago. | ||
| I think that we were at the height of The conspiracy theory, great awakening type of era. | ||
| So I definitely don't think that there's as much interest. | ||
| However, if we do garner a lot more eyes on what is concretely reported, even like I said before, even if it is reported weirdly, then we can probably make a lot more progress as a collective to question it and put more pressure on that information. | ||
| Well, there might be some dead ends there and a lot of questions remain. | ||
| But another interesting topic of research that you are continuing to engage in is what appears to be blatant pedophilia in the fashion industry. | ||
| And I'm quite frankly shocked at some of the images that you share on Twitter. | ||
| Viewer discretion advised. I want to get into that on the other side of this. | ||
| Folks, if you want to follow all of Natalie's great work at Natalie Denise on Twitter, you can find her threads on Cornell and Bennington, her research there. | ||
| And then also we'll go into some of your threads on what appears to be blatant pedophilia in the fashion industry. | ||
| And folks, I'm telling you, you see this stuff and you almost can't even believe it. | ||
| But the images that you see from some of these fashion designers, they can only be evaluated one way. | ||
| I have been in a 28-year marathon battle with the globalists. | ||
| I have come from nowhere, to the very heights of politics, not just in America, but in the world. | ||
| We are engaging the globalists at point-blank range in the information war. | ||
| But I don't deserve the credit. | ||
| Yes, I've persevered. | ||
| But the listeners and viewers who support Infowars are the real reason we've had this success. | ||
| We're having now the greatest victories in the fight against the Newell Order we've ever had. | ||
| We are now entering the final mile of the marathon. | ||
| And that's why today it's more important than ever to realize how important you've been in this fight and to continue in the efforts you've been carrying out and to intensify them. | ||
| God bless you all. I salute you. | ||
| I thank you. And I beg you to intensify what you're doing now because we are over the target and history is happening. | ||
| The fight is my fight. | ||
| It's your fight. It's our fight. | ||
| God bless you all. So it was about a month or so ago when Balenciaga dropped an ad that shocked and horrified the world that had all sorts of undertones of child abuse and pedophilia. | ||
| And it kind of got swept under the rug, all things considered. | ||
| And Valencia really gets away scratch-free with even Kim Kardashian and others trying to justify what they did just disgustingly. | ||
| But... We're good to go. | ||
| First of all, before you get into what was discovered here, and look, viewer discretion advised folks, we're going to show you some images of children that these fashion industry is using that is quite shocking and horrifying. | ||
| But before we even get into the details of it, I mean, how do you even explain this? | ||
| Is an explanation even offered? | ||
| It really isn't. | ||
| I mean, it's just, what's so weird is it kind of seems like an inside, not a joke, but like just an inside thing that goes on in the fashion industry, which is so strange to me. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Like a wink and a nod, like, yeah, we're all into this. | |
| Like a child, you know, dismemberment and children in distress and pain and things like, and gore and Satanism. | ||
| I mean, it's just really weird. | ||
| I mean, this is the fashion industry. | ||
| So we may have just lost connection there. | ||
| We'll get Natalie reconnected shortly. | ||
| Natalie, we just lost connection. | ||
| You were explaining, how does this have anything to do with fashion, this undertone of child abuse? | ||
| Right. Yeah, it's a question for me, too. | ||
| I mean, you know, it just seems to be like a common undertone in the fashion industry. | ||
| It's kind of like a sick inside joke to them that they like children in distress and, you know, children in pain and gore and Satanism. | ||
| It's just it's the wildest thing that I've ever seen. | ||
| And I have seen different tones of this with certain people that I've looked into in the past. | ||
| I just didn't know that it was so widely shared with the fashion industry and fashion industry insiders. | ||
| Yeah, the amount of images you found is horrifying in and of itself. | ||
| And it's, you know... | ||
| Again, it's not just the obvious questions of how does this have anything to do with fashion. | ||
| I think it's shocking how really it's not even that beneath the surface. | ||
| I mean, there have been issues in the past where people have dug in, say, I think there was like the wafer scandal and other things where people would find like a pair of shoes for like $16,000 or like a weird chair for like $30,000 and people thought maybe there was something else going on there with these secret links, these secret tabs that you had to have the exact... | ||
| Tab to get access to but with these images I mean this stuff isn't really hidden that beneath the surface I mean you just get you just get right beneath the surface it's all there Oh, yeah. | ||
| I mean, the recent scandal that I guess has been going on is just, you know, blatant pedophilia, you know, and again, it just trickles down from, you know, some of our key players that we've recently discovered within the Balenciaga saga, but then somehow it sort of connects to other industries in other countries. | ||
| So, you know, and it's What I'm referring to is a recent one that I uncovered with another account called Cancel Balenciaga 22 on Instagram. | ||
| So this was a Ukrainian fashion photography collective that literally utilized children in their shoots in a very sexualized manner. | ||
| I don't know what it is. | ||
| I don't know why people, you know, besides pedophiles, would find this appealing in the fashion world. | ||
| You know, and here's the... | ||
| When we look at the media, because they get to decide, right? | ||
| They pick and decide what they want to panic about. | ||
| And here's an example I'd use. | ||
| There was a... | ||
| It was either a country music singer or maybe she was like a reality TV star. | ||
| I can't remember. Maybe you can help me remember. | ||
| But she's at a wedding with her family and she has a Trump hat on. | ||
| And I think her name was Sweeney or something. | ||
| And the media throws this tirade, and they're like, oh my gosh, Sidney Sweeney, thank you, I think she's a country singer, and the media's like, oh my gosh, look, and she's got a, someone has a Trump hat at a wedding, my God, it's a wedding with a Trump hat, and there's this whole, they go up into this tizzy about it, But then there's James Gunn, who openly sexualizes children with internet posts, and he just continues to get new jobs in Hollywood. | ||
| So it's like, oh, cancel the girl for a Trump hat, but oh, James Gunn sexualizing children with internet posts on these websites, well, that's forgive and forget. | ||
| Oh, yeah. I mean, talk about those industries, but also in the fashion industry, right? | ||
| Like, when you look at Vogue, for instance, Vogue was actually implicated in one of the most recent uncoverings with these very sexualized fashion collectives, and they actually selected this group as one of the top 100 artists in the entire world. | ||
| And this was out of about, I believe it was like 30,000 entries. | ||
| And this one group called Gorsad Kiev, which if you went to their Instagram right now, you would see that they have minors up on Instagram. | ||
| So, you know, there are very many facets we can look at. | ||
| We can look at the social media space, keeping these images on these accounts, keeping these accounts afloat, but also Vogue, right? | ||
| Vogue selected them. | ||
| And when you even look at the irony in all this, you know, Anna Wintour decided to cut ties, | ||
| like just out of example, I know Kanye has a lot, you know, a scandal even attached to him in itself. | ||
| But when Kanye started speaking out, they cut ties with Kanye, | ||
| but they can't cut ties with child sexual abuse or even make a statement on the Balenciaga scandal, right? | ||
| So if you look at that from that perspective, the entire fashion industry could actually do a lot more | ||
| to speak out and make a statement about it. | ||
| But you see what sort of side they're on because of their lack of response. | ||
| Speaking of Kanye or Ye rather, where is he? | ||
| He's disappeared off the map. | ||
| Are you concerned? | ||
| He actually was spotted yesterday with a mysterious blonde woman yesterday. | ||
| I believe they were walking into some hotel or some venue. | ||
| Mysterious? What does that mean? | ||
| He was wearing jeans and a hat. I'm not too concerned. | ||
| I think he just went off the grid. | ||
| I think there were rumors that he visited Ghana or something like that, probably just to get away from all the craziness. | ||
| Well, I'm going to be continuing to follow your coverage on all these stories. | ||
| It really doesn't get covered anywhere else. | ||
| So I appreciate you doing the groundwork on all of this, folks. | ||
| It's Natalie Denise on Twitter. | ||
| Let me correct that. Natalie Denise at it. | ||
| It's Natalie Denise. | ||
| And where else can people follow your work, Natalie? | ||
| Oh, they can find me on Instagram. | ||
| YouTube is my regular as well. | ||
| But Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube are my main platform. | ||
| So thank you so much. All right, so if any of these stories interest you, you're probably not going to see coverage like it anywhere else except right there at It's Natalie Denise on Twitter and her YouTube channel. | ||
| Natalie, thank you so much for joining us today. | ||
| Keep up the great work. Thank you. | ||
| You guys have a great day. Alright, there she goes. | ||
| And of course, ladies and gentlemen, it's always important to make sure that InfoWars exist as the mothership so that we can give a platform and a bigger voice to people like Natalie Denise doing that work out kind of in the darkness. | ||
| and we need to bring light to the work that she's doing and with so many other guests and issues here as well. | ||
| So continue supporting us by shopping at infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Again, ladies and gentlemen, the 50% off specials have to come to an end soon. | ||
| We're running out of product. | ||
| It's kind of a catch 22. | ||
| We like selling the product cheap and getting it off the shelves and keeping the thing going. | ||
| But also when we sell it cheap, we're not making as much money. | ||
| And in the Biden supply chain, it's harder to get these things back in stock. | ||
| So the 50% off specials at infowarsstore.com are gonna be coming to an end soon. | ||
| And some of the top selling, top rated products like vitamin mineral fusion that is 50% off | ||
| are selling out quickly. | ||
| So get to InfoWarsStore.com, take advantage of these sales before it's too late. | ||
| Alright, I want to look at the geopolitical news now. | ||
| And of course, on top of all of this is Davos that is about to kick off. | ||
| And the list has just leaked. | ||
| We have that at InfoWars.com. | ||
| Breaking. Davos 2023 guest list leaked. | ||
| Globalist preparing final phase of the Great Reset Takeover. | ||
| Now, I know there's going to be journalists there reporting and we'll be talking to them. | ||
| But the thing is, this thing is so locked down and they secure this thing. | ||
| It's like the Super Bowl. You can't even get access. | ||
| So the reporters will be there behind the massive walls and fences and security apparatus. | ||
| And it's just reminding you, these are the elites dominating you. | ||
| And oh, they're just setting policy. | ||
| Because, you know, they need to dictate what's going to be done with the AI rollout. | ||
| How the corporate world government is going to function with the social credit score and the medical tyranny. | ||
| And they're building the future. | ||
| To control you. Because after all, they're the stewards of humanity. | ||
| Yes. It's all a giant cabal. | ||
| And the entire idea and concept and foundation of America is against groups like this imposing their will on you. | ||
| And that's why they seek to destroy our great country. | ||
| And we must protect it. | ||
| At times with life and limb. | ||
| But here's what's going on. | ||
| So the situation in Russia, again, the media is just completely missing the boat, as they always do, but that's because they don't want to get it right, and they're driven by hatred of Russia and the propaganda that they consume. | ||
| But there's two developments happening right now. | ||
| We are facing the entire NATO in Ukraine, Kremlin says, as UK moles battle tanks. | ||
| Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Pastrashev has issued ultra-provocative words claiming that it's not fundamentally Ukraine that Russia is at war with, but that the Russian military is facing all of NATO inside Ukraine. | ||
| So there's a couple aspects of this. | ||
| You have, honestly, the one thing you need to understand is that Putin is really being, I don't want to say it's not even passive-aggressive. | ||
| He's being very tolerant and patient during this entire process. | ||
| I think to an extent, he's upsetting some of his military generals and maybe even some of his troops because they're kind of going over there with kid gloves. | ||
| And I think some of the other generals in Russia that weren't given command of these operations, he cut deals with the generals that basically he trusts, Putin trusts, and he said, you're going to be in charge of this. | ||
| I'm not going to tell you how to wage this war, but we're going to come to some agreements on some things. | ||
| And some of the concessions was it's going to be as non-aggressive as possible with as little death as possible. | ||
| That's what Putin demanded, and he was able to find some generals to agree with that. | ||
| Most generals don't agree. Some of the troops and some of the generals are like, let's just wipe these guys off the map. | ||
| What are we doing here? Why are we playing games with our food is how they look at it. | ||
| And then they look at the West and the United States with absolute disdain because we're the ones really funding and waging this war against Russia. | ||
| But here's the analogy. | ||
| Here's the analogy. | ||
| I like to use sports analogies, and so we'll use one here. | ||
| This is like if I am the Dallas Cowboys, and I have a game, and the Cowboys, me and the Cowboys, take the field. | ||
| And we're scheduled to play the Philadelphia Eagles. | ||
| And so we get out there on the field and we're expecting to play the Philadelphia Eagles. | ||
| And so here come the Philadelphia Eagles out of the tunnel, and you're like, all right, there's the Eagles. | ||
| We got a game against them. But then you keep noticing, and then you're like, well, wait a second. | ||
| That guy, he plays for the Green Bay Packers there. | ||
| And that guy over there, he plays for the Minnesota Vikings. | ||
| And that guy's on the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. | ||
| And this guy over here, he's on the Pittsburgh Steelers. | ||
| And that guy, he plays for the New York Jets. | ||
| And then all of a sudden, you look, wait a second. | ||
| We're not playing the Eagles. | ||
| We're playing all these other teams. | ||
| And so that's like it is in Russia. | ||
| Russia's like, alright, we got a situation with Ukraine. | ||
| We've got some issues here with Ukraine. | ||
| I guess we're going to war with Ukraine. | ||
| And then you show up and it's really just all these Western countries and their troops and their weapons and their money and their propaganda. | ||
| And so this is angering the Russians. | ||
| But Putin already made deals with his generals and they aren't breaking them. | ||
| And here's what's going on now. | ||
| Ukrainians to start training on Patriot missiles in US as soon as next week. | ||
| And remember, that liar Zelensky, he said, we don't need training. | ||
| We know how to use all of your weapons and equipment. | ||
| Oh, he lied. Go figure. | ||
| So now, why are they training here? | ||
| I think that's, I mean, they might be doing that as a distraction. | ||
| They're training in Poland right now, folks. | ||
| They're already training in Poland, not just how to use the Patriot missiles, but tanks and other weapons as well, and helicopters and everything. | ||
| So this is almost like a distraction. | ||
| And they're probably just bringing these Ukrainians over here as a propaganda stunt. | ||
| But this just shows you the West and the US have no, at least at the White House level, at the Pentagon level, at the military level, have no interest in stopping what they're doing in Ukraine right now. | ||
| It is dangerous. It is out of control. | ||
| And it needs to be stopped. | ||
| And a peace deal needs to be reached. | ||
| And if we can't reach a peace deal, I mean, really, if you want to take a stand and pretend like the US is still the leader of the free world, you stand up and you say... | ||
| We're not going to get involved in this, or we're going to stop getting involved in this, whichever one you think has more leverage, until we get a peace deal. | ||
| And so then that puts the onus on Russia, or that puts the onus on Ukraine, whichever way you play it, whichever way strategically you think is better, to make But none of that's going on. | ||
| Everybody just wants war. | ||
| Putin tried for peace multiple times. | ||
| He put his demands out there for years, and they never did it. | ||
| And now they've got their little Zelensky in there, their little warmonger, laundering money and weapons through Ukraine for the West in their proxy wars against Russia and their other proxy wars going on in that region. | ||
| But they haven't realized in their arrogance, in their hubris, they haven't realized the rest of the world is done with these war games, done with the Western military industrial complex, and that Russia is actually... | ||
| Gaining momentum, leverage, influence, and respect in the geopolitical world, and the U.S. is sliding down the table. | ||
| And they're acting like this story is proof that Russia's losing the war. | ||
| It's not. Russia artillery fired down nearly 75%, U.S. officials say, and laid a sign of struggles for Moscow. | ||
| No, ladies and gentlemen, there's either one of two things happening here. | ||
| And maybe both, actually. | ||
| First of all, as I explained, the Russian military is now getting back and sitting on its hind legs. | ||
| They're girding themselves for winter. | ||
| And it's been pretty mild over there, so I guess it's not cold enough for them to make their next move. | ||
| But this isn't signs that Russia is struggling. | ||
| It's the exact opposite, folks. | ||
| The Russian troops are well fed. | ||
| They're well nourished. | ||
| They've got all the equipment they need. | ||
| Everything is good as far as the Russians basically hunkering down right now, getting prepared. | ||
| It's the Ukrainian fighters, wherever they may be from, that are short on food, short on weapons, short on everything. | ||
| So, Putin may be saying, let's stay hunkered down here, and let's try for a peace deal at all costs, or we're hunkering down here waiting to make our next move until the time is right. | ||
| And the media just says, look, Russia's not firing. | ||
| They must be losing. | ||
| They must be struggling. | ||
| When it's the exact opposite, folks. | ||
| It's the Ukrainian troops that are struggling. | ||
| It's the Ukrainian troops that are starving and freezing, lacking equipment. | ||
| Lacking ammunition, and quite frankly, quickly lacking the will. | ||
| The only will to continue waging this war is from Zelensky's propagandists and the United States Western military-industrial complex. | ||
| And this is going to be one of those things where, look, I hope this thing doesn't get out of control. | ||
| We'll see how big and bold the West is. | ||
| But it might even come down to something where the world just moves on and kind of just treats the United States of America under Biden like a little kid flicking a spitball at you or something and just says, you know what, we're not going to respond to you anymore. | ||
| Just shoo fly. | ||
| Shoo fly. And the involvement between China and Russia and the BRICS system, I think, is the proof that the rest of the world now has very little regard or respect for the United States under Joe Biden. | ||
| We've got some interesting developments happening. | ||
| I think this is going to be an ongoing story in this 118th Congress, specifically in the House. | ||
| The Republicans in the House are doing serious business. | ||
| And we'll see how much of the Republican effort in the House dies with Mitch McConnell at the Senate. | ||
| And it's just, man, what a shame. | ||
| We didn't address election integrity. | ||
| And now all the good things that Republicans in the House are doing are going to go to the Senate to die. | ||
| Like abolishing the IRS and getting this complex tax bracket out of our lives. | ||
| The only hope you really have is maybe Kirsten Sinema and the gentleman from West Virginia, Joe Manchin. | ||
| But even then, I don't think they still don't have the votes, right? | ||
| I mean, it's 52 for the Democrats. | ||
| So even if two Democrats switched, they wouldn't have the votes. | ||
| So it's sad. I think this Republican-led House is going to make a lot of great efforts. | ||
| And because of Mitch McConnell, all the efforts are going to go to the Senate to die. | ||
| Really sad stuff about that. | ||
| But we'll pick that up, that story up. | ||
| Let me finish with some of this geopolitical news. | ||
| Brazilian Senator Lula's Justice Minister knew about attack beforehand, stood by, and did nothing. | ||
| The Brazilian, January 6th, goes on. | ||
| Brazilian Senator Marcos Doval says he has evidence. | ||
| The new leftist Justice Minister Flavio Deneau was informed of the threat against the government buildings in Brasilia and did nothing. | ||
| That is the capital of Brazil, Brasilia, more inland. | ||
| Val plans to visit the gym where protesters are being held without charges, attorneys, or basic amenities. | ||
| It's the Brazilian January 6th. | ||
| And again, they knew that there was a threat to their capital, and the local communists stood down to have their Reichstag moment, just like they did here on January 6th. | ||
| And then the attacks of Bolsonaro and the media continue. | ||
| And so, you know, look... | ||
| The reason why it's important you understand the syndication process of internet news is so that you understand how they try to force this into your consciousness. | ||
| And so you open your computer or your internet tabs or whatever, they want you to land on their propaganda sites like MSN. They want you to use their propaganda sites and they get force fed into your email. | ||
| And so that's what they do, and they syndicate it everywhere across all their propaganda sites like this one from MSN. Brazil riots put spotlight on Trump-Bolsonaro relationship. | ||
| So it's all about demonizing Trump with this, demonizing Bolsonaro, making it out like, oh, right-wing extremism is the problem around the world, when we all know it's the exact opposite. | ||
| It's left-wing extremism that is the problem all around the world. | ||
| So what do they do? | ||
| They project. They reflect. | ||
| They deflect. And they give you the reverse reality. | ||
| It's left extremism that's the problem. | ||
| So they say right extremism is the problem. | ||
| And then they write all the articles. | ||
| And then they syndicate them to every major news outlet that they control. | ||
| So that it's force fed into your consciousness. | ||
| And you don't even know any better. | ||
| You're not politically informed or concerned at all. | ||
| You just see it and accept it. | ||
| Like, oh wow, Trump Bolsonaro must be bad. | ||
| Right wing bad. And you have no idea what's actually going on. | ||
| But let me do this. Because... | ||
| This, I think, is what it really comes down to. | ||
| Forget about Republicans or Democrats. | ||
| Forget about Trump or Biden. | ||
| Forget about Lula or Bolsonaro. | ||
| Forget about the politics of it. | ||
| Forget about the debates. Just remove everything and look at a story... | ||
| At the lowest common denominator, face value, objectively, universally speaking, as you possibly can. | ||
| And I think it's highlighted perfectly with this story from the Gateway Pundit today. | ||
| Trust your senses. Comparison of Trump, Bolsonaro, Biden, and Lula crowd sizes. | ||
| So again, forget about your politics and all the other stuff that's going around in your head right now. | ||
| And just think of this as a stand-alone. | ||
| Forget about what you think about the election results in 2020 or in 2022 in Brazil. | ||
| Forget about all of it. When you look at the objective, universal facts that are easily observable with the naked eye and the human experience, Donald Trump is a thousand times more popular than Joe Biden. | ||
| Jair Bolsonaro is a hundred times more popular than Lula. | ||
| This is objective fact. | ||
| This is easily observable with the human eye fact. | ||
| With all kinds of different examples. | ||
| Whether you want it to be rally size. | ||
| Whether you want it to be impressions on internet posts. | ||
| Whether you want it to be general interest in news stories. | ||
| Merchandise sales. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, all of it. All of it. | |
| It would be like going to Yankee Stadium and seeing every seat in the stadium filled, every person filling a seat with a New York Yankees jersey on, and then going down to The Tampa Bay Devil Rays, and it's 2,000 people in the stadium, practically empty, and half the fans are for the opposing team. | ||
| Well, what do you conclude by that? | ||
| The New York Yankees are a lot more popular than the Tampa Bay Devil Rays. | ||
| Easily observable, universal fact. | ||
| It's the same phenomenon with Trump versus Biden. | ||
| It's the same phenomenon with With Bolsonaro versus Lula. | ||
| Now, anybody being honest, anybody who's being honest would accept that basic fact. | ||
| Okay, so now you get into the issue of the elections. | ||
| Well, gee, how is it that Biden gets more votes than Donald Trump? | ||
| How is it that Lula gets more votes than Bolsonaro? | ||
| It doesn't pass the eye test. | ||
| It doesn't pass the smell test. | ||
| It doesn't pass the reality test. | ||
| So who knows what goes on when the elections go down? | ||
| Who knows how Joe Biden gets more votes or Bolsonaro loses to Lula? | ||
| But the fact that there isn't a universal question being easily observed and asked, which is, how is it That Trump, who is vastly more popular than Biden, by any metric observable with the human eye and the human experience, how is it that Bolsonaro, who is more popular by any easily observable through the human experience facts with your eye, with your senses, how is it that those two men, vastly more popular, unarguably more popular, | ||
| How is that possible? | ||
| Anybody that is focused on reality, anybody who's asking the real questions, anybody that's observing this would ask this. | ||
| But, of course, something is up. | ||
| Something doesn't add up here. | ||
| And we know why the left doesn't want you to ask these questions. | ||
| And we know why the left wants to turn these questions into violence and claims that you're violent if you ask these questions. | ||
| Because they know it doesn't add up because they're the ones rigging the score. | ||
| They know their candidates are not popular and don't win legitimately. | ||
| So they create false flag events and And censorship activity to try to confuse the general public and deceive you from what is clear, easily observable, universal fact that Donald Trump is 100 times more popular than Joe Biden and that Bolsonaro is 100 times more popular than Lula. | ||
| So yeah, you should be asking the obvious question. | ||
| How is it that Trump and Bolsonaro lost despite every easily observable, through the human experience, real-world metric would prove that Lula and Biden never had a chance to win an election and are nowhere near as popular as their counterparts were? | ||
| But we don't get to have that discussion. | ||
| We don't get to have that debate. | ||
| And we're told, don't believe our own lying eyes. | ||
| Don't believe the reality of the human experience in the 3D world. | ||
| Don't believe any of it. | ||
| Believe the mainstream media propaganda. | ||
| Believe the election results that make no sense to you. | ||
| Just believe it because they told you to. | ||
| But then again, if you don't believe it, We're going to censor you. | ||
| We're going to silence you. | ||
| We're going to threaten you. | ||
| And we might even show up to arrest you and lock you up and throw away the key so that you don't shut up or so that you will shut up and you don't question these obvious observations. | ||
| So we have the 88th Texas legislation that got signed in today right here in Austin, Texas at the Capitol building. | ||
| And circling around the Capitol was a plane with a banner that said, we want a vote on Tegxit. | ||
| And of course, that is the Texas exit. | ||
| We can roll the B-roll here, guys, of clip six for me. | ||
| Seen circling the Capitol on the first day of the 88th Texas legislation, a plane flying with a we want a vote on Tegxit banner. | ||
| I like that. | ||
| Anything to get away from this corrupt federal government, the absolute corruption and disdain for the American people that comes out of D.C. these days, tags it. | ||
| Maybe that's the answer, for states to just vote themselves out of federal government jurisdiction. | ||
| Not out of the Union, just out of federal government jurisdiction. | ||
| So, in other words, you come here, you're an FBI agent, you have no jurisdiction. | ||
| Shut down! | ||
| Limit federal jurisdiction to D.C. Just cut them off from the country. | ||
| But hey, more good things to celebrate. | ||
| Not just the potential Texas, but ladies and gentlemen, we now have three LGBT members of the Texas House. | ||
| Thank goodness we finally have done it. | ||
| Three, three LGBTQ members of the Texas House. | ||
| We're celebrating this great victory. | ||
| This progressive victory for Texas. | ||
| I'm sure they'd vote for a Texit 2. | ||
| No, they'll vote for whatever the Democrat Party tells them to vote for. | ||
| Meanwhile, these are the types of people coming to America, and then they want to tell you... | ||
| Actually, wait a second. Guys, is clip 3 the clip from yesterday, or is this a new one? | ||
| Oh, okay. I'm sorry. | ||
| I was confused because there was a clip. | ||
| Do we have it ready to go? | ||
| Yeah, yeah. So, I'm sorry. | ||
| I got confused on my numbers here, guys. | ||
| But here's the clip I was talking about. | ||
| People that come to this country and then want to tell us how to live our lives. | ||
| Listen to this. Guns. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay? That's the biggest problem in this country. | |
| Oh, guns! We don't know statistics in the UK for crime. | ||
| Pause it. Pause it real quick. Go back. | ||
| Guns are the biggest problem in this country, she says. | ||
| Guns. An inanimate object. | ||
| You could take every gun in this country and put it wherever you want. | ||
| Put it into a dumpster. The fact doesn't change that guns are an inanimate object. | ||
| So an inanimate object, she says, is the biggest problem. | ||
| Maybe you could say violence, which is people. | ||
| But go on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Guns, okay? That's the biggest problem in this country. | |
| The statistics in the UK for crime is zero for guns. | ||
| So go back to the UK! Why is it so bad? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why is there a seven-year-old with a bloody gun? | |
| Democrat! Come on, think about it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's do something. We've got a new governor now. | |
| Let's do something. Let's change it. | ||
| You've got a beautiful country. | ||
| You've got beautiful people. But what's the problem? | ||
| Freedom! Guns. How does a seven-year-old have a gun? | ||
| That's what I'm pissed off with. | ||
| I'm only here because my husband's in the military, or otherwise I would not have chosen to come to this country. | ||
| Good, then get the hell out. | ||
| We don't want you here. | ||
| But you know, here's the problem. | ||
| These are just dumb people. | ||
| That's a dumb woman. She's dumb. | ||
| She doesn't get the issue. The issue is not guns. | ||
| Guns are not the issue. | ||
| The issue is the right to self-defense. | ||
| Why this intellectual, logical issue skips them is obvious to me. | ||
| They're dumb people. They don't get it. | ||
| I'm not going to mince words here. | ||
| If you don't understand that this is an issue of self-defense and not guns, you're an idiot. | ||
| If somebody comes to your house with a gun, what are you going to do? | ||
| If a bad guy comes to rape a woman on the street with a gun, what is she going to do? | ||
| Oh, thank God the government got rid of those guns. | ||
| Thank God that law-abiding woman is now going to get raped because she can't have a gun. | ||
| And this kind lady from across the pond is going to come here and tell us how to live our life. | ||
| No thank you. We believe in freedom here. | ||
| We have a problem with violent people. | ||
| In Democrat-run cities because these cities have been destroyed and turned into impoverished, crime-ridden zones because of Democrat policies. | ||
| And it's not even about the guns. | ||
| It's about self-defense. And if you don't understand that, you're an idiot. | ||
| You know, it is lazy on my part to call that woman an idiot, even though that's accurate. | ||
| But it was funny because I'm so just... | ||
| I'm just perturbed at the ignorance of missing the issue altogether. | ||
| It's not about guns. I'm so just perturbed how people don't understand that. | ||
| I'm genuinely amazed at how ignorant people are to not understand the issue. | ||
| It's not guns, it's self-defense. When you can give thousands of different examples of exactly why the Second Amendment exists. | ||
| But I'm sitting here, and I missed out on the greatest irony of all in that video. | ||
| What does she say? She says the only reason she's here is because her husband is in the military. | ||
| How much do you want to bet that woman has a gun at home? | ||
| How much do you want to bet that that woman's husband has a gun at home? | ||
| He's in the military. | ||
| He gets a gun. | ||
| He gets a gun. | ||
| He gets given a gun. But you don't get one. | ||
| She doesn't want you to have a gun. | ||
| Just her husband in the military. | ||
| The government gets a monopoly on violence. | ||
| The government gets a monopoly on firearms and self-defense. | ||
| That's the angle here. | ||
| Not about guns cause violence or a gun might end up in the hand of a child. | ||
| That's a parent issue. | ||
| That's a societal, civilization issue. | ||
| That's not a Second Amendment issue. | ||
| That's not a gun, an inanimate object issue. | ||
| And these are the people we go up against. | ||
| These intellectual nothings. | ||
| These brain-dead, propagandized slaves that want to vote us into slavery. | ||
| But yet, you know her military husband has been given a gun by the government and probably has a gun at home. | ||
| Might even have one right there on the street next door in that interview. | ||
| And then she comes here to this country and says, you need to ban your guns. | ||
| Go back to England. | ||
| She says she wishes she wasn't here. | ||
| Well, that's great. Go back to England then. | ||
| Go to another royal parade and worship royalty. | ||
| We, oh boy, I wish we had kings and queens instead of guns. | ||
| We'd be much better then. | ||
| It's just an amazing thing that they don't understand what the Second Amendment is about. | ||
| And they genuinely, they don't get it. | ||
| They just completely don't get it. | ||
| And that's fine. People are allowed to be stupid. | ||
| People are allowed to be ignorant. | ||
| But you know what? Maybe they shouldn't vote. | ||
| Now, good thing that woman doesn't vote. | ||
| She's not from here. But you know there's millions of people like that out there. | ||
| An inanimate object is the issue. | ||
| We need to vote against an inanimate object. | ||
| And by the way, criminals always abide by the law. | ||
| So the criminals with the guns, the bad guys with the guns, they're of course going to turn all their guns into the government tomorrow, right? | ||
| That's going to happen. And then how are you going to get the guns from the law-abiding citizens? | ||
| Of course you're not going to bring a gun to that transaction, right? | ||
| I mean, it's just complete lunacy, zero intellect. | ||
| It's the lowest of human intellect to not understand that issue. | ||
| You don't even have a survival instinct. | ||
| You don't even have basic common sense and logic. | ||
| All you have is your brainwashed propaganda mind thinking that it's all about an inanimate object and you're going to virtue signal like you're so much better than a gun owner. | ||
| Give me a break. | ||
| Alright, I'm ranting here. | ||
| I'm going to refocus, and I'd like to take some phone calls too, so I'm going to try to squeeze some phone calls in, but we still have a bunch of important news to get to, like vaccine death news, and we got some crime news, but I really, I feel like I'm missing something here. | ||
| I want to re-emphasize this issue for some phone calls maybe later, because I think I'm missing some. | ||
| All of the mystical tales of what they tell you Trump did but they're guilty of. | ||
| Secret documents. | ||
| They said Trump keeps secret documents. | ||
| No, that was Bill Clinton. That was Joe Biden. | ||
| Quid pro quo with Ukraine. | ||
| They say Trump did that. They impeached him over it. | ||
| There was nothing. No, that was Biden at the Council on Foreign Relations while he was vice president. | ||
| Russian collusion. Trump guilty of Russian collusion. | ||
| No, that was Hillary Clinton paying for the Steele dossier from Russian intelligence. | ||
| Kids in cages. Trump puts kids in cages. | ||
| No, that was Barack Obama, and the videos and images you used of the kids in cages were from Obama's years as president. | ||
| I know I'm missing some, and so I want to open up the phone lines. | ||
| Maybe you can fill in the blanks on that issue, or we can talk about some other stuff. | ||
| But in the meantime, other dots, other things to take care of here, other I's to dot, T's to cross here. | ||
| First, at InfoWarsStore.com, you know, so many people talk about trouble sleeping, and I can relate to that, believe me, and there's all kinds of reasons. | ||
| There's all kinds of reasons why we have problems sleeping. | ||
| For some, it may be different than others, but there's a common solution, and that is down and out at InfoWarsStore.com, 40% off. | ||
| I'm an individual that, you know, I just have an active mind and an active body, and so it's hard for me to just calm down and sleep at night ever since I was a kid. | ||
| And so really, I've been taking sleep aids since I was a kid with, you know, my mom trying to help me sleep, feeling bad when I was younger, just never sleeping at night, just always awake. | ||
| She could hear me shuffling in the other room on my computer, whatever. | ||
| And so I've tried all kinds of different sleep aid supplements over the years. | ||
| And I got to tell you that down and out, if it's not the best, it's certainly in the conversation for the best. | ||
| And I don't think you're going to get or find a better sleep aid out there for the price. | ||
| Definitely not. Because if I find a sleep aid that knocks me out like this, it's usually a very expensive supplement. | ||
| There's some of that stuff out there. It's almost like medical grade stuff. | ||
| And I mean, you know, It's like what they'll give people in the military to just say, you haven't slept in three days. | ||
| Here, go sleep for 12 hours. | ||
| It's going to knock you right out. Now, Down and Out is not like that, though the next morning you might feel a little lethargic, but you can kick that out with a couple of Brain Force Plus capsules. | ||
| But folks, if you're having trouble sleeping and you're looking for something that works every time and at the best price, the most effective, Down and Out from Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| I mean, guys, give me the full screen of this. | ||
| It's got a 4.6 star review. | ||
| And I could sit here and I could read the reviews for you. | ||
| And I'm already guessing it's probably the people saying the exact same experience I've had. | ||
| And that's just, hey, I have trouble sleeping and I just couldn't find out anything else but this works. | ||
| So some people didn't like it. | ||
| It's not for all people. | ||
| Some people prefer the capsuled stuff. | ||
| But if you want the liquid stuff, then I suggest this. | ||
| Like from Ace 7 Mile. | ||
| A1 product, he calls it. | ||
| And so look, there's a bunch of pays of the reviews. | ||
| Read the good reviews. Read the bad reviews. | ||
| Maybe this one isn't for you. | ||
| We have other sleep aids at InfoWordStore.com. | ||
| But I'm telling you, this one, this is the best one that I've tried. | ||
| I recommend it. | ||
| And I think that you will find for yourself that if you struggle to sleep, this will just knock you out. | ||
| Helps me fall asleep despite daily Adderall XR meds. | ||
| So again, some of the medication people are on causes them to have trouble sleeping. | ||
| This can help. Help my son sleep immensely. | ||
| From Liberty Mom. | ||
| The name says it all. | ||
| Down and out. From Yankee Doodle. | ||
| These are all certified reviews. | ||
| But I can also tell you from my own experience. | ||
| It will knock you down and out. | ||
| 40% off at Infowarsstore.com and of course it's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
| Alright, a couple quick things here and then I'm going to come back and hit the important vaccine news in the next segment and then maybe open the phone lines because I think I'm missing something here with the they said Trump did it but they did it phenomenon. | ||
| At least 17 dead in deadliest day of anti-government protests in Peru. | ||
| So the situation in Peru continues to be deadly with the protests down there. | ||
| And it's a story around the world. | ||
| But Peru continues to have deadly protests. | ||
| Including... The clashes occurred in Juliaca, a city near the banks of Lake Titicaca in southern Peru's Puno region. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Not Lake Titicaca. | |
| Anywhere but Lake Titicaca. | ||
| Saudi Arabia reportedly to bend its law to allow Ronaldo to live with partner Georgina Rodriguez. | ||
| Look, I see the Middle East romanticizing Westernism right now. | ||
| And it's obviously not been the smoothest process. | ||
| But I look at some of the stuff in Qatar. | ||
| I look at some of the stuff that the UAE and Saudi Arabia are doing. | ||
| And I really see it kind of a romanticism with the West, where they're trying to cling to as much traditional value and heritage as they can, but also, it's been there before, folks. | ||
| This phenomenon has happened in Egypt before, and Iran and other places before, where they have this romance with Westernism, but they still try to find a way to balance that, clinging to their traditional values and such. | ||
| And usually, once it gets to that point, some Western interests come in and muck things up. | ||
| But I see this as romanticizing with Westernism, allowing Ronaldo, first buying Ronaldo to come play in Saudi Arabia, I mean, to live golf tour or everything, and then saying, well, it's a law, you can't live with someone that's not your wife. | ||
| But you know what? For Ronaldo, we want to come down here, we want to bring sports here, so we'll bend the law and let you do it. | ||
| You know... This is some heavy stuff that we're going to get into here. | ||
| And it's even heavier. | ||
| And I was really weighing this last night and today. | ||
| How... I don't look at myself as, say, a trauma surgeon or a brain surgeon or a first responder where you're out there saving lives every day and that's your job. | ||
| But we're at a different level And it's like there's a war going on where there's people that want to kill humanity every day and there's people that want to save humanity every day. | ||
| And when you look at the vaccine issue, it's one of the better examples where people pushing this vaccine on you are trying to kill you, maybe unwittingly, unconsciously. | ||
| Versus the people that are warning you not to get the vaccine, they're trying to save your life. | ||
| Even if it's not like they want to save your life, it's just they want you to be informed so you can make a decision. | ||
| Which, in the result, saves lives. | ||
| So it's like, I don't look at myself... | ||
| Because I've had people say, and somebody said it to me last night. | ||
| They're like, you know how many lives you probably saved? | ||
| And it was a comment... | ||
| From somebody saying, you know, I watch your show every day and I didn't get the vaccine, but here's all the members of my family that got the vaccine. | ||
| Two have been hospitalized, one died. | ||
| And them saying that could have been my fate. | ||
| I probably would have gone and got the vaccine if I wasn't listening to your show. | ||
| So again, I don't look at myself as somebody that's out here doing that life-saving work like a trauma surgeon or a first responder. | ||
| But there is this larger kind of ever-encompassing battle going on where some people are putting out into the universe the frequency of death while others are trying to push back against that, the frequency of life. | ||
| And the vaccine issue is a perfect example. | ||
| Here's that... | ||
| Happening in real time personified with a debate between Neil deGrasse Tyson and Patrick Bett David. | ||
| The whole debate was incredible. | ||
| Here's a short clip from the Patrick Bett David podcast in clip 7. | ||
| Your own body. If you want to get an abortion, get an abortion. | ||
| If I want to get the vaccine, I get to choose. | ||
| So you can't force... | ||
|
unidentified
|
If I can't force you to get an abortion, you shouldn't be able to force me to get the... | |
| Because it's not about you. It's about people you interact with. | ||
| And that's the social contract of public health. | ||
| Now, that's the argument they always go to with the vaccine, which, of course, should never be made. | ||
| It's a hollow, shallow argument. | ||
| Because if the vaccine works, then why do I need it? | ||
| So, they always make this argument that's dead on arrival. | ||
| If you are saying that the vaccine works... | ||
| And I need to get the vaccine to protect others around me, but you've had the vaccine, then what are you concerned about? | ||
| So this argument never works. | ||
| Anytime you hear somebody make that argument, you should shut it down immediately, and you should tell them stop talking immediately. | ||
| You're embarrassing yourself. | ||
| If the vaccine works, then you're protected, whether I've been vaccinated or not. | ||
| So this is not about protecting you. | ||
| This is not about protecting others. | ||
| This is about you telling us what to do with our bodies. | ||
| So that argument has a 0% leverage in a debate and has 0% effectiveness as an argument because it falls flat on its face because you're admitting the vaccine doesn't work. | ||
| So you admit the vaccine doesn't work then, which why should I get it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
See? Continue. | |
| I don't even know if the vaccine worked or not at the time. | ||
| Yes, that's what the trials are! | ||
| Dude, that's why these trials... | ||
| Are you missing data out there? | ||
|
unidentified
|
But let me ask you a question. Are we saying only one type of... | |
| Now, pause it again. Pause it again and rewind this, because this is actually a very important thing to watch. | ||
| Now... I've never been too enamored by Neil deGrasse Tyson because he always seemed like a propaganda person kind of foisted upon us. | ||
| Now, that's not to take away from his genius and his intellect. | ||
| That is certainly existent there. | ||
| But they pick and choose people who get to become famous, who get to be the voice on these issues, and they clearly chose Neil deGrasse Tyson for whatever reason. | ||
| He goes along with all their propaganda. | ||
| But watch. See, here's something I want you to notice. | ||
| And look, this is the exact reason why I would never claim to be some sort of scientific genius like this. | ||
| Because you notice with scientific genius or even geniuses in medicine and stuff, you notice they always have control over their emotions. | ||
| I struggle with that. | ||
| But you'll notice that. They always have control. | ||
| Look at Ben Carson. Perfect example. | ||
| You ever seen Ben Carson get upset? | ||
| You ever seen Ben Carson wavering emotionally? | ||
| Or is he always in control? Look at Dr. | ||
| Peter McCullough. These are true geniuses of their craft. | ||
| And they're confident and they're smart. | ||
| They never lose their cool. Did you see what happened to Neil deGrasse Tyson right there? | ||
| He lost his cool. | ||
| Why? Because he knows he's wrong, he knows he's uninformed, and he knows he's on the wrong side of this debate. | ||
| So he loses his cool and starts flailing and screaming... | ||
| Because it shows he's not the intellectual genius that he pretends to be on this issue. | ||
| In fact, he's the nincompoop on this issue, so he tries to make up for that by flailing around. | ||
| And that is a perfect example Right there. | ||
| If he was confident in his genius on this and he was confident with his information, he wouldn't need to flop and flail around like his counterpart, Patrick Bett David, is remaining cool. | ||
| I want to play that part again, guys, because I think it's important for people to watch. | ||
| This is not how geniuses behave. | ||
| You know, they tell us Neil deGrasse Tyson, the genius of the era. | ||
| No, I doubt it. And it's all exposed in that one moment right there. | ||
| Patrick Bett David completely exposes the lack of genius, at least on this vaccine issue, and shows the weakness of the intellectual arguments that Neil deGrasse has. | ||
| We haven't even gotten through the clip, and he totally exposes him right out of the gates here. | ||
| Watch Neil deGrasse Tyson flop and flail around as he gets put into checkmate by Patrick Bett David. | ||
| Social contract of public health. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We don't even know if the vaccine worked or not at the time. | |
| Yes, that's what the trials are! | ||
| Dude, that's why these trials... | ||
| Are you missing data out there? | ||
| But let me ask you a question. Are we saying... | ||
| Is that how a genius behaves? | ||
| Is that how somebody confident on their issue that also supposedly is a genius with a high IQ behaves? | ||
| No. No, that's like the opposite. | ||
| That's lacking confidence. | ||
| That's lacking intellect. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, continue the clip. Only one type of scientists are right. | |
| No! We're saying that the system in place... | ||
|
unidentified
|
The 16,000 that signed up... | |
| No, no, no. The system in place... | ||
| See how he's flopping and flailing and shaking? | ||
| There's an entire system that's in place. | ||
| And there's more to it, too. Pause it. | ||
| Why is he shaking? | ||
| Why is he shaking right now? | ||
| Why is he wavering right now? | ||
| Because he knows he's been propped up to be the intellectual superior in any conversation he has. | ||
| And now Patrick Bette David has completely exposed that as a fraud. | ||
| So now he's up there shaking and he's rattled and he doesn't know what to do because now the whole world will see that the supposed genius Neil deGrasse Tyson ain't that smart after all. | ||
| Continue. Review boards and all of this, that's in place. | ||
| Now you can say, what you can say is, I have a better idea than all these review boards and all these agencies and the CDC. I have a better idea, here's what you should do, and that would have made everything better. | ||
| Okay, you can put forth that idea, but what I'm saying is... | ||
| In a case where you can contaminate someone else, it's not about you. | ||
| It's about the collective health. | ||
| You're assuming. So your vaccine doesn't work. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're assuming because somebody can take the vaccine won't get COVID, which, by the way, I don't need to play that. | |
| Amazing stuff there, guys. | ||
| Patrick Bet-David completely eviscerates Neil deGrasse Tyson. | ||
| Neil deGrasse Tyson exposed as the genius he's not. | ||
| All right, here's what I got to do. | ||
| I gotta cover the rest of this news, this segment, but I really want to in the last segment. | ||
| I feel like I'm missing something in this just mystical phenomenon of everything they accused Trump of doing, they're guilty of. | ||
| Again, here's my short list. | ||
| Taking secret classified documents, that was the Clintons and Biden. | ||
| Quid pro quo with Ukraine, that was Biden. | ||
| Russian collusion, that was Clinton. | ||
| Kids in cages, that was Obama. | ||
| I know I'm missing others. | ||
| I know I'm missing others, so if you can fill in the blank for me, please call in. | ||
| Let's expand this list because I know there's others out there. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| 877-789-2539. | ||
| Only on that subject. | ||
| Call in and give me your example of what they accused Trump of doing they did themselves. | ||
| I know I'm missing some, but this is truly a mystical phenomenon. | ||
| It is... It's not properly being covered here. | ||
| So we're going to cover it here and make it a thing because I know there's more out there. | ||
| Now, in the meantime, folks, I'm telling you, Patrick Bett David just completely destroys the smartest man alive, supposedly, Neil deGrasse Tyson on the vaccine issue. | ||
| He's not that smart after all, is he? | ||
| Or he's not smart enough not to sell his soul to big pharma propaganda. | ||
| Here's some other cases of this. | ||
| The vaccines are inducing sudden cardiac death. | ||
| Lead study author calls for immediate suspension of jabs due to serious harms. | ||
| Like, remember, DMX? DMX had a heart attack right after taking the COVID-19 vaccine. | ||
| Raptor's family clarifies. | ||
| By the way, DeMar Hamlin, who we're still curious about the vaccine status of with the cardiac event he had, he's undergoing a lot of tests today. | ||
| So if we don't get any answers on that situation by the end of tomorrow, they're covering something up. | ||
| And that's my assumption, and I think we all know what that would be. | ||
| Italian tennis star embroiled in fake vaccine certificate scandal. | ||
| Now, remember this. | ||
| Now, my guess is Camilla Giorgi, the Italian tennis player, is not the only athlete that is doing this. | ||
| I guarantee you a lot of American athletes did this, probably more so even than we realize. | ||
| So, I mean, we've heard about Germans and we've heard about other doctors who have been caught and had the charges dropped of faking vaccine status. | ||
| These are heroes. They took a risk to protect other people's lives in a time of great medical tyranny. | ||
| It'd be like if you were in France, let's say, and the Germans were coming in looking for Jews to round up and you took a couple Jewish people into your house and hid them in your basement to protect them. | ||
| That's what these doctors did. | ||
| They protected these people from this Nazi-esque medical experimentation on people. | ||
| So these doctors are the good guys that did this. | ||
| And she was arrested for this, but I guarantee you she's not the old one. | ||
| She's not the only one there. She's not the only one here. | ||
| Now here's another news report on this continuing phenomenon. | ||
| Of all the sudden death and all the numbers of excess death coming in through the insurance companies, check out this one. | ||
| Life insurance companies' unexplainable deaths increased by 40% in middle-aged men last year. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here it is in clip 5. U.S. life insurance companies have reported an overwhelming and unexplainable increase in all-cause deaths among 18 to 49-year-olds. | |
| Along with that, there's also been an increase in certain medical diagnoses such as miscarriages and Bell's palsy. | ||
| Here to give us her take on the new data and what she believes could be causing the rise in numbers is emergency medicine and disaster specialist Dr. | ||
| Kelly Victory. Dr. Victory, good morning. | ||
| Great to talk to you as always. | ||
| Good morning, Jason. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thanks for having me. Okay, we want to make sure that any time we talk, we want to make sure the information that we have is accurate. | |
| So let's start this interview by telling us, I've seen your correspondence here, what is the source of the information that you're about to present? | ||
| Well, this information became available to me or on my radar last week following a hearing with Senator Ron Johnson, who was looking at sort of what he calls a second opinion on the entire response to the COVID pandemic. | ||
| The medical data was released by three career military physicians who got the information from the military database that collects what we call ICD codes, which are the diagnosis codes. | ||
| And these physicians had a feeling, they believed, based on their own observation, that they were seeing a significant uptick in certain conditions. | ||
| So they actually went back and called the database from the military on certain conditions over a five-year period from 2016 through 2020, notably containing One year, 2020, of the full-blown pandemic. | ||
| So they looked at 2016, 17, 18, 19 and 20 at the prevalence of certain conditions, including | ||
| things like heart attack, blood clots to the lung, miscarriages, those sorts of things. | ||
| And they compared it to the incidence of those same things in the calendar year 2021 and saw | ||
| an alarming increase in certain things. For example, they saw a 270 percent increase in | ||
| myocardial infarction in 2021, a 300 percent increase in incidence of Bell's palsy and of | ||
| certain neurologic complaints. You know, this is really just an incredible thing to think about. | ||
| I mean, imagine if somebody brings out a poison to the market and just mass introduces a literal poison to the market and it gets mass produced and mass promoted for everybody to take a poison. | ||
| Well, you don't have to imagine it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You're living it. And it still happens. | |
| You go to a local Walmart, you go down the street, you'll find a vaccine, a COVID vaccine pop-up tent. | ||
| And it's just literal poison. | ||
| Just putting poison into your body. | ||
| An experimental injection. | ||
| And they tell you safe and effective, safe and effective. | ||
| And they're all lying about. Unbelievable stuff. | ||
| I mean, so many people need to be arrested and thrown in jail forever because of this. | ||
| Unbelievable stuff. And in a similar vein, though, a story developing in New York, thousands of New York City nurses go on strike because of chronic understaffing. | ||
| Um... I gotta be honest with you. | ||
| I looked at this. I'm not buying it. | ||
| Something else is going on with this story. | ||
| I'm not saying the nurses are the bad guy here, but I'm just saying something else. | ||
| This doesn't add up, folks. | ||
| Because actually, the truth is, a lot of nurses have been hired recently because in the Biden economy, with a lot of other jobs going away or just not making ends meet, nurses are getting a good living. | ||
| Nurses' wages are going up, and you can work long hours if you want or not. | ||
| Plus, If they're complaining of understaffing, and then almost 10,000 of them go on strike, well, okay, where is now the complete disaster in New York when it comes to hospitals? | ||
| If you already have a nurse shortage, and now almost 10,000 nurses are on strike, well, certainly the hospitals must be falling apart. | ||
| There must be no help. But that's not the case. | ||
| So something doesn't add up to me here. | ||
| Someone is being dishonest. | ||
| Someone is being disingenuous. | ||
| This story doesn't add up to me. | ||
| And by the way, nothing is new in the nurse workload other than maybe vaccine and other medical mandates that they may be subjected to. | ||
| Nurses have always had long hours and tenuous schedules. | ||
| There's nothing new to that. | ||
| So there's something else to this story here. | ||
| It doesn't add up. Somebody's not being honest. | ||
| Somebody's being disingenuous when it comes to that story. | ||
| You're claiming to be chronically understaffed, even though a lot of nurses are still being hired because it's a job a lot of people want right now. | ||
| They're getting hired every day. | ||
| But if you're understaffed, there's already this emergency at the hospital. | ||
| You're understaffed. It's so busy. | ||
| And now almost 10,000 of you are on strike. | ||
| Well, then certainly you go to New York. | ||
| You're just not getting any help in a hospital right now, right? | ||
| I mean, there's clearly a disaster, right? | ||
| But that's not happening either. | ||
| So something off about that one. | ||
| Not quite sure how to sum that one up. | ||
| Or perhaps this one. | ||
| The news sometimes, just what in the hell? | ||
| Jislaine Maxwell is hosting etiquette class for inmates. | ||
| Where she is preaching about women's empowerment. | ||
| What is she teaching them how to be? | ||
| Hookers? And maintaining high moral standards. | ||
| Oh my gosh! In an attempt to rebrand as a female role model. | ||
| Whew! By the way, where are her clients? | ||
| Oh, you don't get to know about her clients. | ||
| She's just teaching an etiquette class in jail. | ||
| The Satanic Temple is dedicating the largest Satanic gathering in history to the new Boston mayor. | ||
| Congratulations to the new Boston mayor, a Democrat being celebrated by the Satanists. | ||
| You must be proud. Take a victory lap. | ||
| Some sad news last night. | ||
| The great entertainer and patriot, Diamond, from the dynamic duo of Diamond and Silk, passes away last night. | ||
| And her big heart and love for this country does not die with her, though. | ||
| She leaves that behind for the rest of us, as we remember her. | ||
| What a dynamic duo. Diamond of Diamond and Silk passes last night. | ||
| A not-so-dynamic duo that was honored by Joe Biden was a couple of individuals you may remember, Ruby Freeman and Shea Moss, that were involved in the shenanigans in some way, shape, or form, whether wittingly or unwittingly, of what went down in Georgia during the 2020 elections. | ||
| And so they've now been honored by Joe Biden. | ||
| Attacks on mother-daughter election workers continue as they prepare to receive White House honor. | ||
| So they were the ones there in Fulton County when all of the shenanigans were going on. | ||
| And look, I'm willing to hear their side of it, or I'm willing to assume that they might even not be involved with any of the election tampering that was going on there. | ||
| But see, now they're going to be honored by Biden, which makes me doubt that they're so innocent. | ||
| But aside from that, the real story here is why did they lie about a water main break? | ||
| Why did they say they were shutting down and closing the vote tallying areas when they | ||
| didn't? | ||
| They lied about a water main break so that they could claim they were closing them and | ||
| then we have the footage of them claiming they closed them and then they went in there | ||
| and started counting votes again. | ||
| So that's the real story. | ||
| Whether these two had anything to do with it or knew what they were doing, I'm willing to be open-minded there. | ||
| But the fact that they act like nothing suspicious went down in Fulton County, nothing suspicious went down when they lied about a water main break, and then these two get awarded by the president for being involved in that instead of questioned and investigated? | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, I think that makes me a little more suspicious of these two. | ||
| Alright, now I'm looking for more examples of they are guilty of what they accused Trump of. | ||
| We've got secret documents, that was Clintons and Biden. | ||
| We've got quid pro quo with Ukraine, that was Biden. | ||
| We've got Russian collusion, that was Clinton. | ||
| And we've got kids in cages, that was Obama. | ||
| We now go to Marvin in Alabama. | ||
| Marvin, what's your example of they accused Trump what they're guilty of doing? | ||
| Not exactly a legal case yet, but they always love to accuse Trump of wanting to sleep with his daughter when it's more likely, it seems like, that Biden actually did sleep with his daughter. | ||
| So, you know, that's pretty interesting to me. | ||
| And there's quite a few of those kinds of situations. | ||
| I will say that you mentioned, I think, yesterday that if people disagree with you, they should call in. | ||
| I know you don't have time tonight, but I totally disagree with you about the fake vaccine card issue, and it would take probably too long to get into it. | ||
| Yeah, I'll tell you what, I am interested in that. | ||
| I would love to have that conversation. | ||
| Now is not the time, but Marvin, I'll tell you this, the next time we talk about that and open up the phone lines, I'll put you at the top of the list because I like people calling in to disagree. | ||
| That's a good thing. | ||
| Awesome. All right. Thanks, man. | ||
| Thank you. And thank you for that contribution. | ||
| I think that's a great contribution. | ||
| A little outside the box, but legitimate. | ||
| They do claim Trump had some sort of physical attraction to his daughter. | ||
| Turns out that was actually Joe Biden. | ||
| We learned that from the Ashley Biden diaries. | ||
| We know Joe liked to shower inappropriately with his young daughter. | ||
| Let's go to Mike in New York. | ||
| Mike, what's your example of they're guilty of what they accused Trump of? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, what's up, Owen? Just want to start off with, I was super happy to see you on Rumble yesterday, last night. | |
| That was refreshing. | ||
| I sent you your first super chat, so... | ||
| Oh, wait, wait, wait. | ||
| Were you the guy that called me the boomer or the guy that bought me the drinks? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I wasn't going to bring it up, but I called you the boomer in the tech space. | |
| It was pretty funny. It was okay. | ||
| I thought it was funny. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, but... Hey, if you need moderators for that later on, once it gets popping, I can tell the waters are going to get chummy in the chat. | |
| So I'll work free of charge. | ||
| I'm free Monday night. And just briefly, because I want to hear, just briefly so people get a little context here. | ||
| Folks, last night I went live on Twitter. | ||
| And we did not get banned. | ||
| So by the way, the crew back there said I would be banned by the end of the live stream. | ||
| Ha ha, hee hee, ho ho. | ||
| I did not get banned. | ||
| So it's not my official account. | ||
| I'd still like to get my official account reinstated with the 200,000 some followers I had there. | ||
| But I launched a new account, didn't get banned. | ||
| We did a two hour live stream last night at Owen Schroer Live. | ||
| So I'm back on Twitter, at least from a live capacity. | ||
| And you can go follow that and I'll be going live when there's breaking news or right now the plan is every Monday night at least for the next eight weeks. | ||
| But back live on Twitter at Owen Schroer Live. | ||
| Not going to be treated like a normal Twitter account because I still want to get my normal account back. | ||
| But we made it through last night and so I think I'm allowed to exist there. | ||
| Mike, glad you tuned in. But what's your example of they're guilty of what they accused Trump of being? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So I'm going to reach into my pail here, and I'm going to grab the broadest brush I can find, and it's going to be, for four years straight, I heard nothing about, actually, let's call it almost six now. | |
| I heard nothing about, nothing but, Trump is a racist. | ||
| Trump is a white supremacist. | ||
| Trump is a, you know, and then their immediate follow-up after all of that for four years was, hey, vote for me, or you ain't black. | ||
| No, I think it's a great example. | ||
| It might be a little broad, like you said, but I think it's a fair example. | ||
| Thank you for the call, Mike. | ||
| I think it's a fair example. They all accuse Trump of being racist. | ||
| They're the ones that don't let white people in areas. | ||
| They're the ones that don't let Asians get merit awards. | ||
| They're the ones that just come out with blatant racism against white people. | ||
| like in New York where they're trying to stop a judge from being | ||
| confirmed because it's a white person and they want a brown person. So yeah, | ||
| no, I think you're 100% right. Trump did all the action. | ||
| Trump got awards for being not racist. | ||
| He was friends with all kinds of people throughout his life. | ||
| So no, that's a fair one. | ||
| They accused Trump of being racist. They're the real racists. | ||
| All right, let's go to Joey in Vermont. Joey, what's your example of they're | ||
| guilty of what they accused Trump of being? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Owen! Big fan, man. | |
| Big fan. Can't wait for Turbo Force to come back, but I'll keep it short and sweet. | ||
| I got two of them for you. | ||
| The first one is they pretty much accused Trump of stealing the election with January 6th or trying to, but they're the ones who stole the election, like, hands down. | ||
| You know what? It'll be debated. | ||
| It'll be talked about, but for me, it makes the list. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It checks out. Awesome. | |
| And then, um... | ||
| Also, you know, they act like, you know, we don't care about public health, but you know, then they're the ones who want to go and inject everyone forcibly with an experimental shot. | ||
| Yeah, that one's a little... | ||
| That one's not as specific on Trump. | ||
| So I'm gonna... That one doesn't make the list. | ||
| It's not specific enough. | ||
| I'm talking about specifically with blaming Trump that you can turn around and see they're doing exactly what they accused Trump of doing. | ||
| All right. Thanks for the call, Joey. | ||
| How about Jay in Wyoming? | ||
| Jay, what's your example of they did what they accused Trump of? | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right, bear with me. The guy there in the house at dummy shit... | |
| He said that he had naked pictures of Trump, but I saw a video there, and it looked like Biden was whipping a girl tied up to a post. | ||
| But beyond that, all the naked pictures of the family. | ||
| Yeah, you know what, though? | ||
| I think, so this is kind of, this is a different angle of the Russian collusion. | ||
| It was Hillary that actually colluded with Russia, but it was the accusations that, oh, | ||
| Trump was, you know, peeing on hookers or whatever. | ||
| That was, I don't know if I can put that on the list because I've put out the theory that | ||
| all the blackmail that they tried to use to claim against Trump, you know, peeing on hookers | ||
| and all this stuff, I have the theory that that's actually Hunter Biden. | ||
| And that was opposition research done on Hunter Biden. | ||
| He was the one with the hookers and the pissing and all of that. | ||
| And I think there's plenty of circumstantial evidence to at least that's what Hunter Biden is into. | ||
| But whether or not that was opposition research on Hunter Biden and they just replaced the words Hunter Biden with Donald Trump. | ||
| I don't know if we can confirm that enough to put it on the list. | ||
| But it gets an honorary mention, I think. | ||
| I think for now it gets an honorary mention and we'll write it down with an asterisk. | ||
| But yeah. I think all the things they said about Trump with the peeing on the hookers and everything in Russia, I think that was actually Hunter Biden opposition research blackmailed that they just decided it was going to be Donald Trump instead. | ||
| All right, one more. Let's go to Sarah in Illinois. | ||
| What's your example of their guilty of what they accused Trump of? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hey, Owen. Good to talk to you. | |
| My first thought was Trump's a racist, but my second thought was Trump's a liar. | ||
| And I can't give specifics on what he lied about because I think they just accused him of lying about everything. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, it's not specific enough. | ||
| I mean, it's true. They call Trump a liar. | ||
| They're all the liars. That one might be a little too broad, though. | ||
| I don't know if that one's specific enough. | ||
| Well, it's good to talk to you, Owen. | ||
| Have a great night. You're awesome. | ||
| Okay, Sarah. Thank you. You're awesome, too. | ||
| All right. There you go, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Another InfoWars war room in the books brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| Remember, I'm about to sign off, folks. | ||
| The sales at InfoWarsStore.com are going to be lifted soon. | ||
| 50% off vitamin mineral fusion, 50% off DNA Force Plus, 50% off the real red pill. | ||
| We're running out of stock on vitamin mineral fusion, so stock up on that like I'm going to. | ||
| And DNA Force Plus at 50% off, that might not last much longer either. | ||
| And remember, it's your support, getting the great products at InfoWarsStore.com that keeps us on the air. | ||
| We thank you for it. And we will see you after a 21-hour break. | ||
| You stay classy, InfoWarriors. | ||
| Back in stock, down and out liquid sleep support. | ||
| It's been out of stock for a while. | ||
| It's one of three sleep aids we have at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| This one has been very popular. | ||
| It's sold off the shelves. It's back in stock, down and out liquid sleep support. | ||
| This is probably the strongest sleep aid that we have, I would say. | ||
| Knockout, Rocket Rest, both great. | ||
| Comes in pill form. This is the liquid tincture, and I think this is probably the most powerful one. | ||
| Survival Shield X2 Nascent Iodine. | ||
| This is, if you haven't done an iodine challenge yet, if you haven't done the iodine challenge, what are you waiting for? | ||
| Now is the time. Super Male and Super Female Vitality. | ||
| Living Defense Plus and the Organic Greens Fiber Caps. | ||
| We have a limited supply of these right now, but we want to sell them all out so we can order a new batch. | ||
| It was very popular. The Organic Greens Fiber Caps. | ||
| But we have all kinds of other great supplements that are great for so many different things. |
Export Selection