All Episodes
June 3, 2021 - War Room - Owen Shroyer
02:11:39
FULL SHOW: We Are Under Attack By Our Fellow Man - Time To Act!
Participants
Main voices
a
alex jones
07:29
d
dr david martin
32:25
d
dr jane ruby
01:01:26
n
norm pattis
05:53
Appearances
g
greg reese
02:20
r
rand paul
02:05
Clips
a
anthony fauci
00:37
b
bill gates
00:16
d
david knight
00:48
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
alex jones
Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us on this Thursday, June 3rd worldwide broadcast
of The War Room.
.
And here we are with a lot of big developments.
We are witnessing the fall of the globalist Bill Gates frontman, Anthony Fauci.
Trump blasts Fauci for Wuhan gain-of-function research, devastating emails in news statements.
President Trump has issued a scathing response in the release of Anthony Fauci's emails, noting that he routinely disagreed And that's really good news that Trump is finally starting to realize that he was set up and that the vaccine isn't a vaccine, that it's a gene therapy, and this is all Bill Gates' rodeo.
If you can read the full statement by President Trump, you know, he launched that thing that was a one-person message board that would cost $5 to set up, where he would make statements that no one can interact.
No wonder he got rid of it, because it's not interactive.
Just can't wait until he just goes to Gab, and they have 2 million users signed up for a year to listen to him, but he can post videos there, but of course he doesn't do it, because he's surrounded by scum.
But a statement by Donald John Trump for the President of the United States of America.
After seeing the emails, our country is fortunate.
I didn't do what Fauci wanted me to do.
For instance, I closed our borders to China very early despite his not wanting them closed.
The Democrats and the fake news media even called me a xenophobe in the end.
We saw this was a life-saving decision.
And likewise, with closing our borders to Europe, specifically to certain heavily affected areas, I was never given credit, even by Tony, for saving hundreds of thousands of lives.
Dr. Fauci also didn't put an emphasis on the speed of vaccine production because he thought it would take three or four, maybe five years, because they wanted to keep stuff locked down that entire time.
That's where Trump got suckered in.
I got it done in less than nine months with Operation Warp Speed.
Yeah, be really proud of yourself, Trump.
In retrospect, the vaccine is saving the world.
Wow. So he's still buying that hook, line, and sinker.
Then I placed the greatest bet in history.
We ordered billions of dollars worth of vaccines before we knew it even worked.
That doesn't sound good.
And had not even done.
Our wonderful vaccines would not have been administered until October of this year.
Not one would have shot now saved the world and millions of lives.
Well, so there you go. Also, Dr.
Fauci was totally against masks when even I thought they would be helpful.
Well, now they're proving to be a fraud.
But again, this is Trump at least beginning to criticize Fauci, something that he's not done so far.
There are lots of questions that must be answered by Dr.
Fauci. The funding of Wuhan by the U.S. was foolishly started the Obama administration in 2014 but ended under the Trump administration.
That's true. When I heard about it, I said no way when Dr.
Fauci... Know about gain-of-function research, and when did he know it?
So, that's what Trump, or whoever wrote that, had to say.
It's not very well written, and it's quite frankly, completely idiotic.
But, there's another statement here that Trump's put out, statement by Trump, fourth for president of the United States of America.
Now everyone, even the so-called enemy, are beginning to say that President Trump was right about the China virus coming from Wuhan lab.
The correspondence between Dr.
Fauci and China speaks too loudly for anyone to ignore.
China should pay $10 trillion to America and the world for the death and destruction they've caused.
Well, you can't put a price on life.
And as far as I'm concerned, President Trump is completely...
Compromised by his involvement with Fauci and Gates, and he's been completely suckered by him and just still can't admit that and still can't get to that point.
So we just move on from there, but at least he's started to criticize him.
All right, your next guest host is taking over on the other side, Dr.
Jane Ruby. So stay with us for that.
She's got a bunch of big guests coming up as well.
We're very blessed to have her.
Click the link below and share this important report.
unidentified
Thanks for watching.
This is a test.
greg reese
Pop culture has touted Elon Musk as some sort of eccentric heavyweight genius with humble beginnings.
But this is demonstrably false.
Elon Musk was born in South Africa, where he claims he grew up extremely poor.
But his family owned an emerald mine.
As a teenager, Elon would trade emeralds for cash in New York City.
And his father bragged how they had so much money we couldn't even close our safe.
Musk claims to have had about $100,000 of student loan debt, but he received a full scholarship to the University of Pennsylvania, where he bought a 10-bedroom frat house with his friend Adeo Resi and ran an illegal nightclub.
The pop culture claim is that Elon has an IQ of 155, but this has never been tested, and after being accepted into Stanford for PhD studies, he dropped out after two days.
After dropping out, Elon began his first business venture with his brother Kimball, Zip2, which was essentially a digital version of the Yellow Pages.
The brothers received tens of thousands of dollars from their parents, and yet Elon denies this.
An associate of Elon's father, Greg Curry, got involved to bring in investors.
But Elon's code was no good, so they had to hire on professional coders to rewrite everything.
Zip2 was then sold for $307 million to Compaq, who later shut it down without ever earning a profit.
Elon made $22 million, bought a $1 million McLaren F1 supercar, which made mainstream news before he totaled the uninsured vehicle.
Musk then went on to create an online bank, X.com.
He partnered with banking expert Harris Fricker, Edward Ho and Christopher Payne.
All three ended up leaving the company after accusing Elon of lying to the media about the quality of their product.
Elon claims he founded PayPal.
Before the company was named PayPal, it was known as Confinity.
It was founded in 1998 by Peter Thiel and Max Levchin.
After losing millions of dollars, Elon's X.com was bought by Confinity in a merger in 2000.
All Musk contributed at Confinity was his own power struggle.
He made himself CEO and pushed to change the name to X.com.
dr jane ruby
Love being back in the War Room with everyone.
You can find the rest of that video at band.video online.
So thanks for joining us today.
I'm really excited to be back in the War Room.
And I have an action-packed three hours for you.
The team has put together a lot of great stuff.
And overall, I think the theme for this show that I've been invited to host, subbing in
for Owen Schroer, is really that we're under attack.
We're under attack as human beings and unfortunately it's not by aliens or anything like that.
It appears to be from our fellow man and there's been a long history bringing us to this point.
My guest today, we've got a wonderful lineup of guests that are going to really blow your
mind.
We're going to bring back Dr. David Martin.
I was happy to guest host recently and brought him on Alex's show.
He is a major universal thinker.
He actually just has aligned a lot of his intellectual thinking with a lot of Alex's predictions.
You're going to find this really interesting.
We'll play a couple of clips from a recent presentation he made where he really explains how we are being pursued.
And taken over. And then I'm bringing back Albert Benvenides.
Some of you may remember him.
He's the gentleman out in San Jose, California, who's been downloading raw data, whatever he can get from the VAERS system.
And he's been keeping these incredible spreadsheets.
He's an analyst and he does this for a living.
So he just has this brilliance about putting the information together.
and he was the one who broke the story that you could clearly show in the
modeling of how the CDC is managing these numbers that they're they're
actually manipulating them and they're throttling them and he's got a couple of
actually some some breaking information for us that hasn't been broken anywhere
else I'm excited to bring him back and in the last hour you saw a very
interesting discussion between Alex and Norm Pattis and I'm excited to have he's
got a little bit of extra time.
He's going to be joining me in the second hour.
They started an interesting conversation about President Trump and some of his recent comments and activities.
So I've got some follow-up questions to his discussion with Alex, and I'm really looking forward to that.
You know, one of the things I want to focus on today in this theme of under attack is what's coming for our children.
Whether you have your own children or not, I think someone mentioned earlier today that we all have a natural, if you're healthy, you have a natural affinity to protect children, but especially your own as your progeny.
So I'm getting really concerned about this program that's about to ramp up by the authorities
to inject children with these incredibly dangerous chemicals, poisons, gene transformation materials.
And really every week that goes by, we're learning more and more about how dangerous they are.
We have adults by the thousands, I can tell you, that are dropping over within days,
heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, miscarriages are off the charts.
I understand the mechanism behind that.
And I've actually explained it a little bit on the show.
We may go back over that, but the main focus of that is the spike protein.
And there's a confluence right now of experts coming together to explain that it's the spike
that's causing everything.
It caused the illness from the coronavirus itself when the flu was going around last year.
It is the pathogenic part of whatever this molecule thing is that, by the way, no one's ever been able to isolate.
As a flu virus.
And it has no one, in all the preclinical research, I don't see anyone coming up with information about whether or not this thing turns off.
And that should scare you.
There's so much we don't know about it.
There's so much dereliction of duty by these companies for their lack of safety.
Why am I saying that?
For an open-label observational study.
So now people are just, you know, lining up like cattle and they're getting this and we're going to have to see what unfolds.
But I'm particularly concerned about children.
We had some breaking news this week about the distribution.
We have photo number four here that you're going to see on the screen.
And it talks about the pharmacokinetics, which...
These companies bypassed.
Pharmacokinetics are studying what the drug does and how it gets broken down and excreted in your body.
And you can see here that there's a ton of concentration.
By the way, that distribution also takes into consideration concentration.
Where does it end up? And where does it end up parking itself if it's not able to be excreted?
These spike proteins are ending up.
And primarily in the ovaries, but they're also ending up in your blood vessels, on the lining of your blood vessels, your cardiac tissue, and your lungs.
And this is why you're starting to see a lot of these issues come up, people running to the hospital.
We have a clip later on in the show of a young woman down here in Florida.
She regrets taking it very much.
She's chronicling her journey, and we're going to share some information from her.
But this concentration in the ovaries, Israel's taking it seriously, and they're actually starting a study.
And I'll be talking about that a little bit later in the show.
You can go see it on clinicaltrials.gov.
And I think we had previously, we had shown a picture of a paper that was published, actually, last December.
They knew, CDC knew, everybody knew that there was a connection between these jabs and cardiac damage.
We've got a great show coming up.
Again, I'm Dr. Jane Ruby.
Thrilled to be back with you today in the War Room.
Stay tuned. You're not going to want to miss today's podcast.
rand paul
Serial passage through cell culture that the mutations appear to be natural.
In fact, Dr. Barrick named the technique the no-see-em technique because the mutations appear naturally.
Nicholas Baker in the New York Magazine said nobody would know if the virus had been fabricated in a laboratory or grown in nature.
Governor authorities in the U.S., including herself, unequivocally deny that COVID-19 could have escaped a lab.
But even Dr. Xi in Wuhan wasn't so sure.
According to Nicholas Baker, Dr.
Xi wondered, could this new virus have come from her own laboratory?
She checked her records frantically and found no matches.
That really took a load off my mind, she said.
I had not slept for days.
The director of the gain-of-function research in Wuhan couldn't sleep because she was terrified that it might be in her lab.
Dr. Barrick, an advocate of gain-of-function research, admits the main problem that the Institute of Virology has is the outbreak occurred in close proximity.
What are the odds? Barrick responded, could you rule out a laboratory escape?
The answer in this case is probably not.
Will you in front of this group categorically say that the COVID-19 could not have occurred through serial passage in a laboratory?
anthony fauci
I do not have any accounting of what the Chinese may have done, and I'm fully in favor of any further investigation of what went on in China.
However, I will repeat again, the NIH and NIAID It categorically has not funded gain-of-function research to be conducted in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
rand paul
But you do support it in the U.S. We have 11 labs doing it, and you have allowed it here.
We have a committee to do it, but the committee has granted every exemption.
You're fooling with Mother Nature here.
You're allowing super viruses to be created with a 15% mortality.
It's very dangerous.
I think it was a huge mistake to share this with China.
And it's a huge mistake to allow this to continue in the United States.
And we should be very careful to investigate where this virus came from.
anthony fauci
I fully agree that you should investigate where the virus came from.
But again, we have not funded gain-of-function research on this virus in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
unidentified
No matter how many times you say it, it didn't happen.
rand paul
There was research done with Dr.
Xi and Dr. Barrack.
They have collaborated on gain-of-function research where they enhanced the SARS virus to infect human airway cells, and they did it by merging a new spike protein on it.
That is gain of function.
That was joint research between the Wuhan Institute and Dr.
Barrick. You can't deny it.
unidentified
Senator Paul, your time has expired.
Dr. Fauci, I will let you...
dr jane ruby
Welcome back to the War Room.
This is your host, Jane Ruby, in for Owen Schroyer today.
You just witnessed Senator Rand Paul uncovering three acts of perjury.
This Fauci is the Dr.
Mengele of our generation.
This man should be in a federal prison.
What Senator Rand also essentially uncovered right there in front of our eyes is that we paid as taxpayers for our own bioweapon attack upon our nation, upon our families, our friends, our children.
It's absolutely despicable.
This man lied three times in a row.
Why is he not under a criminal indictment or some kind of criminal referral?
We've got to start, you know, I'm tired of all hearings.
I used to call Trey Gowdy, all hearings, no indictments.
Let's move past the hearings and let's start getting some accountability.
We might need to destroy the DOJ and reconstruct it, but that's fine by me.
I wanted to share a little bit more about gain of function.
I know that, you know, you've been talking a lot about it here at InfoWars and people are getting pretty familiar with it, but the best way I could explain it Is to turn something that's natural or some kind of disease, molecule, virus, bacteria into a weapon.
It's actually to manipulate it into something that is dangerous to humans or animals.
And this is what's been going on.
And this is what this sick animal Fauci has been doing for many, many years.
And he's been getting paid highly for it.
And he's been using our money to put together something that finally attacked us very blatantly.
So that's basically what's happening.
And there's plenty of evidence out right now.
And it's coming out every day, as you've seen from Alex and other guests on the show,
that this man has been leading this charge for many years.
So I wanted to share that with you.
I, I, you know, where I understand he's the fall guy and he's going down right now, but where's everybody else?
Where's that big mouth, um, Bill Gates?
Uh, I understand he may be, uh, in some Caribbean Island, um, hiding out, but you don't hear anything from, from the big shot, the virus big shot, right?
Uh, it's really despicable.
Um, Also, one of the things he said that he said the NIAID, the Allergy Institute, which is one of our federal research agencies, has actually been at the forefront of supporting the development of these high-risk pathogens.
I think they created the direction in this mRNA to create a special type.
This spike protein is not like the natural spike on a coronavirus of a common cold or a flu.
This thing has a lot of synthetic footprint to it.
So that's why I'm angry.
I'm disgusted to see how he has just gotten away with everything.
And I'm not so sure, you know, Alex was talking to Norm Pattis about whether it was intentional or not.
We can all have our opinions about that.
But the fact is, this man knew what he was doing and the kind of danger he put us in.
Now, one other thing before we do go into our next break.
In the last segment, I did share with you about where these spike proteins, these pathogens that are disease-causing, We're good to go.
But one of the big issues was that they're concentrating heavily in human ovaries, as well as those other organs I mentioned before, and the testes as well.
And it's such a problem.
Israel's a lot further ahead of us.
They nailed almost two-thirds of their population before they started to slow down.
And they're starting to pay attention to the safety signals that are kind of coming out observationally from this.
And so I wanted to direct your attention to a study that they're doing From what I can see, it is independently funded by a hospital in Israel, which makes me happy that it's not being funded by a pharmaceutical company that will get its little paws in on it.
The Bathsheba Hospital...
It's a study you can find on clinicaltrials.gov.
The number for nerds who love that website like me is NCT04748172. The title of the study is, Are You Ready?
COVID-19 Vaccine and Ovarian Reserve.
This should scare everyone on the planet.
What they're trying to do is I'm sure.
I'm sure.
And they're telling them, and then they're going to measure their ovarian reserve up to a year.
And then they do have a control group, you know, because again, this is not being done by, you know, the globalist companies.
And those women will not be getting vaccinated and their ovarian reserve.
There's a test, there's a hormonal test called AMH. And it looks at your ability to make human eggs.
So I'm glad we had that up on the screen.
Take a look at that trial. This is how serious this is getting.
And when Alex says they're sterilizing the world, I think they're off to a good start.
Jane Ruby in the war room, in for Owen Schroyer, back in a flash.
Hey all, welcome back.
You're in the war room today with Dr.
Jane Ruby in for Owen Schroyer.
And I told you at the beginning of the show, at the top of the hour, that we're bringing back a great expert in terms of tracking and keeping VAERS as honest as we possibly can keep this vaccine adverse event reporting system that the CDC is messing around with as straight as possible.
We're going to bring Albert Benvenides in again with what I understand is going to be a few bombshells at the very least.
Albert, thanks so much for coming back to the show and talking to us.
unidentified
Hey, thank you, Dr. Ruby, for having me.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, Albert, listen, at the beginning of the show, I did share with people, you know, I reminded them, you know, what you do for a living and how you have this expertise.
And now you've transferred this expertise because you have this passion, like we all do, to protect our children, to protect your fellow man in the country.
I know you have about five grafts And you're going to, you know, make some announcements about what some of your findings are.
So tell me what you'd like to start with first.
unidentified
Well, I would like to start with simply stating that 60% of all of the currently reported adverse events are from vaccination dates February and older.
And And what does that tell us?
dr jane ruby
Albert, what does that tell us?
I mean, that they have been withholding everything from after February?
unidentified
Well, not necessarily.
Just that they are woefully behind in reporting the adverse events, if they're going to catch up and report them at all.
Okay. We're up to 297 million doses currently rolled out as of yesterday, and 60% of the whole VAERS adverse effects Are from the first 84 million doses.
So they still got a report on an additional 207 million doses.
So the avalanche should be coming.
dr jane ruby
Let me ask you a question.
If you were a, you know, and you are a modeling expert in terms of When you see a certain trajectory coming out, we have 300 million injections.
Some of those are the doubles for those companies that require a double.
Some of them are single.
But let's just say in general we have 300 million jabs, okay?
Separate jabs.
And you have, please tell me again, as of whatever your latest date is, what are the total number of side effects that we have out of those 300 million jabs?
Is it over 262,000?
unidentified
262,000 exactly.
Total adverse offense currently.
dr jane ruby
Okay, if I'm doing my general math correctly, if you have 262,000 reported on 84 million jabs, then we essentially could be looking at, if we just look at this alone, Really triple that number.
We could have up to almost three-quarters of a billion side effects.
Am I interpreting what you're saying correctly?
unidentified
No, you're correct.
You're correct. I had done some projections earlier, and I was at over a million adverse events and up to 12,000 deaths, which actually mirrored what the...
With the European, the UK yellow card, they have the similar numbers.
They have a million adverse events and 12,000 deaths as well.
So, I mean, that ratio, we should be similar to that if they were caught up.
dr jane ruby
And then Albert, if we multiply by another multiplier that you and I have talked about, Alex has talked about it many times on the show, Owen, everybody's talked about it.
That based on the Harvard Pilgrim study, we are really only seeing in VAERS, because it's self-reporting and for a lot of other reasons, only about 1% of what's really happening in the real world.
We call it real world evidence.
Is it possible?
That if we have one million adverse events, and I acknowledge that, you know, a good portion of them could be very minor, like just a sore arm and they never had anything else again after that.
But potentially 100 million side effect, I mean, side effect incidences?
unidentified
Oh yeah, absolutely.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, this is this is just Albert.
This is just unbelievable. I think every time you each time you come on and each time we've talked to do this research together, I think one or the two of us ends up crying.
Albert, I don't want to.
I want to. Yeah, it's just so horrific.
It's so horrific. And it's.
It's so awful. And we're trying to break a lot of this information out and keep it current because we're trying to also simultaneously convince people to just wait.
I keep telling people, please just wait for the children.
So, Albert, what is your first graph and what are some of the incredible things you want to share with us today?
unidentified
All right. Which one do you want to take us to?
Because I can't see you on the screen or which one you're on.
dr jane ruby
You can take...
Why don't you drive it? And our producers are wonderful.
The crew is great. You tell them which number of your graphs.
unidentified
Let's go to graph number two.
Let's go to graph number two.
dr jane ruby
Okay. And you can start...
Sure, just start with it and they'll get it up.
unidentified
Sure. So that's the adverse events by vax date and or vax month.
So right there you can get an idea of February...
January and December, those three numbers, you add that together, there's your 60%.
You can see we're already in the month of June, so month of May, you can see here there's 5,800 adverse events, very Spartan for the month of May.
dr jane ruby
Albert, let me ask you a question.
You know those big numbers, like in January, I see there's a number 76,000 on that bar.
And then in February, it looks like 51,000.
March, 70,000.
Were they behind?
like when you were in January or February, were those numbers super low and they just are slow?
Or do you think, because if you're telling me that they got them out readily
in January, February, March, and now April and May look like almost nothing,
then they're doing it purposely, correct?
unidentified
Yeah, well, that's the thing.
Um...
Every week that they drop data, they will drop adverse events that were from vaccination dates still in January and in February and in March.
They're not done reporting for those months, in addition to the current stuff.
But what is, if we could just jump to, let's just jump to a different...
dr jane ruby
Before we jump, I wanted to call out a couple of things for the folks.
I know we're still waiting for it to come up.
The title is June 3rd, 2021, Children Myocardial Events, because this is important.
And you see that right now, because we haven't gotten to our children yet, under 17...
You see the majority are 16 and 17-year-olds that have been shoved into these jabs.
And that's where the majority, 101 myocarditis events, and the majority of them are chest pain and myocarditis.
Very frightening. Okay, so I just wanted to go there.
So what is your second graph that you wanted us to go to?
unidentified
Oh, well, if you want to jump out of the...
The myocardial.
dr jane ruby
Where do you want us to go?
unidentified
How about to graph number six?
That's the overall.
This is my money graph right here.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, this is the one that's making you famous, Albert.
What's new about this?
unidentified
Well, you can tell, if you could zero in on where January 9th is, so you can tell the red part, the adverse events, that's when they started to throttle.
Now, I keep saying this and I'm gonna stand by my word that they are throttling, they're selectively throttling
what they're publishing to the public.
And I don't know what went on around January 9th or January 6th for that matter,
but it's like they put on the brakes and changed the way they were publishing adverse events.
adverse events. But...
It's crazy. Mind you now, the amount of jabs during January, by the end of January 31st, we had only rolled out 35 million jabs.
That's it. Yeah.
dr jane ruby
And for the audience, yeah, for those listening or those who are watching and don't, there we go, because it was number six.
This is great. Thank you, guys.
We'll come back after the break.
We are back in the war room.
This is Dr. Jane Ruby in for Owen today.
And we've been talking to Albert Benvenides, who's our guest in this next segment as well.
You know, half of the show is audio podcast, and I guess, I don't know what the percentages are.
So we did, Albert, you did a great job in, you know, just walking everybody through what the meaning of these numbers are.
So, you know, we're going to get, we may get a graph or two up, but, you know, for the other half.
So let's get back to this, because you've really given us some great numbers.
What are, you know, you had a couple of really good Big news pieces, you told me.
Let's kind of get to that because, you know, when you're having fun, the time goes by really fast, Albert.
unidentified
Absolutely. If we can get to graph number seven, I want to just give you my big bombshell right here off the bat.
dr jane ruby
And let's just talk it through.
Okay. Let's talk it through.
unidentified
So buried deep in the disclaimers of the VAERS system, the CDC VAERS system, there's a section called Reporting Issues.
And the fine print of that says that the initial report, when you file a VAERS report, that it's captured in the wonder system.
They call it the snapshot.
And it is published.
It is made public.
It's published into the public domain.
Right. Now, the next sentence right here, it says, however, follow-up reports do not appear in the wonder system.
Mm-hmm. They describe that the system still receives continuous updates, including revisions and new reports, but they're not published into the public domain.
So, Dr.
Ruby, can you imagine that?
There could be CEOs of hospitals running around barking orders to say, hurry up and fill out that VARS report while the patient is still breathing, knowing that...
If the patient doesn't make it, they'll still capture all the data, but it won't be recorded to the public.
dr jane ruby
Right. Albert, something else caught my eye, and you actually underlined it in the document.
Basically, it says that they reserve the right to delete or not report Things that they feel are either duplicates or, I mean, well, I could hide a lot of, I could bury a lot of data under, well, I thought I saw a lot of, and who makes that decision?
There should be an independent fact-checking citizens, you know, committee or something, you know, in there to do this.
So I thought, you know, so anyway, what is your, what's your next big finding?
Because that's a disclaimer that I don't think anyone else is talking about.
unidentified
They're giving themselves... So that's the first one.
Not reporting follow-up reports, basically.
And the second part is to...
If they determine a claim to be a false claim for whatever reason, they can remove or delete the report.
Now, mind you, they give themselves a four to six week buffer from the time you submit a claim, whether you're a physician or a patient.
They give And they do it every week.
dr jane ruby
And I want people to understand.
What Albert is telling us is that, A, if they're giving themselves four to six weeks to vet these things, and then they're giving themselves a CYA to delete whatever they feel like it under the rubric of, you know, duplicate, we didn't like it, it wasn't authentic...
You know, in something that's experimental, where we need that safety signal, we need that information right away, as soon as possible, not in two, three, four months.
No wonder. They're intentionally behind.
Because I think if they had one million side effects...
This whole thing, people would be burning down, then they'd really burn down Capitol Hill.
I mean, this would be crazy.
So what else do you have for us?
Did you have something under your death graph?
You affectionately call it your death graph?
unidentified
Oh, my death. Well, okay, so that was, yes, and that was a graph.
You still need that number.
That was graph number four.
That was graph number four.
Okay. That one is good to freeze the picture on after the interview.
But see, they consistently give us a couple of hundred deaths a week.
And that is so disingenuous because right now, even with their four to six week lag time, we should be right in the peak.
Of what they should be reporting.
So when they're giving us 30 or 35,000 adverse events, new adverse events weekly, that number should be tripled.
And then the 200 deaths that they've been giving us weekly really should be something a lot higher.
I just think they're not only throttling, they're selectively throttling Right, and we're looking at a graph here on the x-axis, which is the bottom, you know, horizontally.
dr jane ruby
What are those?
Are those days or weeks?
unidentified
What are those? Yeah, so each week, each column is a weekly drop.
So I can see how many new cases they gave us, how many new deaths they gave us, and then the cumulative deaths.
The pink section is the last line on the bottom, the pink section.
That's the new deaths each week.
And, you know, quickly you could see that one week where they gave us 584 deaths.
dr jane ruby
Right, just to mix it up.
unidentified
Yeah, that was against only 17,000 new adverse events.
And then fast forward to the most current, you know, it doesn't make sense.
They gave us twice as many adverse effects, new adverse effects, 34,716, yet only 200 deaths.
So... Right, right.
dr jane ruby
There's your pink line.
Now we're looking at the death graph and there's a line at the bottom, new deaths, and we see the numbers are very up and down, as you said, Albert, across the months.
At least this one starts around March 26th and then goes across to the end of May.
Good job getting these numbers from the end of May because that's just a few days ago.
And you can see that for the number of jabs, and if you're saying there have been 300 million jabs, this is just not panning out, Albert.
This is not panning out.
unidentified
Right. No, they're behind.
They're behind and whether they catch up or not is yet to be determined.
I don't think they're going to catch up.
dr jane ruby
Right. Well, they don't want to catch up.
They don't want to catch up.
You know, we started this show with the theme at the top of the hour that we're under attack.
And the key to that is that we're under attack from our own fellow humans, not from aliens, not from monsters or things like that.
I mean, we actually have... We're good to go.
As they try to push people to get jabbed, and they try to attack our children in the coming weeks, they're going to try to attack our 12 to 17-year-olds.
What can you tell us about the children and anything else new?
unidentified
Well, something new and I'll save for you and with you is that, you know, I know that they're making it really difficult to submit a report.
And I think I told you the last time that I submitted a report on behalf of my uncle who got a stroke a month after his second Moderna shot.
And I've been following that and...
You know, what they give me back and how they respond and all the back and forth, the minutia of that whole process is something that I want to break with you again when we have more time.
But yeah, There's a lot of stories that I'm getting that people are having problems not being able to file their report.
It's timing out on them.
Or if they're an old person, they're calling in.
They're on hold.
They can't get to nobody.
dr jane ruby
It's probably intentionally cumbersome.
And maybe it's a good place in this segment to tell people that anybody can file a report.
If you're aware of a report among a family member, a friend, that kind of thing, and you see that they're not reporting or they haven't been able to, some people are in the hospital getting treated for their injury from the vaccine.
You can report for them, Albert.
I want people to be able to find you because you are...
Like a freight train.
Is it odyssey.com, Albert?
Tell people where they can find you.
You break a lot of wonderful videos and show people.
Walk them through. Thank you.
unidentified
I'm on Odyssey and BitChute mainly.
I'm known as WelcomeTheEagle88.
Wonderful. You can find me at WelcomeTheEagle88 on Google.
Thank you, Albert. You're a liar, Beto! You're a liar!
You're a liar! You're a liar about January 6th!
And you're a liar about January 1st!
You are a liar!
Liar!
Liar!
Hey, you started the Democratic Party at KKK!
At KKK, you started the Democratic Party!
You're a liar!
He's here to remind us that this s*** isn't easy.
Another big lie.
Talk about the big lie.
Democrats riot for an entire summer.
Billions of dollars.
And you want to talk about January 6th.
You're all a bunch of frauds.
You're all a bunch of liars and frauds.
We had riots in this country for an entire summer.
Billions of dollars.
Dozens dead! Police officers attacked, ended up in the hospital, and you didn't say anything!
You didn't say anything!
You liars!
You're a liar, Bento!
You are a liar!
Liar! Liar!
Liar! Liar!
Liar! Mr. O'Rourke, can I talk to you?
You said you would give me a word, Mr.
O'Rourke. Can I ask you a question?
What happened to Brian Sicknick?
What happened to Brian Sicknick?
Why don't you care about police getting murdered by Black Lives Matter?
Why don't you care about police getting attacked in the summer of 2020?
Why don't you care?
I said if he would be quiet and allow other people to speak, I would.
bill gates
He didn't honor his part of the deal?
unidentified
No, absolutely not.
Thank you. Aborted babies incinerated to heat UK hospitals.
alex jones
Soylent Green, ladies and gentlemen, is made out of people.
david knight
But now children are literally being passed through the furnace in order to fuel hospitals in the UK. They're being sacrificed on the altar of efficiency and prosperity.
unidentified
What is the secret of Soylent Green?
dr jane ruby
The powdered flesh from dead babies.
Some people believe they can cure disease.
unidentified
Because of its enormous popularity, Soylent Green is in short supply.
david knight
Remember, Tuesday is Soylent Green Day.
unidentified
The supply of Soylent Green has been exhausted.
You must evacuate the area.
alex jones
The federal court ruled that the shareholders of PepsiCo, a big Bilderberg Group company, are not allowed to know what they're using the baby parts for and the flavoring, but we already know.
So enjoy the flavor.
unidentified
We're going to get the real solution, which is going to be a combination of death panels and sales taxes.
david knight
I'm consistently pro-death.
I'm for assisted suicide.
unidentified
I'm for regular suicide.
I'm for whatever gets the freeway moving.
bill gates
Is spending a million dollars on that last three months of life for that patient, would it be better not to lay off those ten teachers and to make that trade up in medical costs?
But that's called the death panel, and you're not supposed to have that discussion.
unidentified
They told me to say that they were sorry, but that you had become unreliable.
david knight
Is this the kind of society that you want to live in?
Any kind of society that would do this to its children will do it to its senior citizens.
It will do it to its dissidents.
That kind of society will also eventually turn on its police, on its army, on its prison guards, on the quizlings and the collaborators who make that possible.
This is nothing but a suicide cult.
unidentified
The scoops are on their way.
rand paul
The scoops are on their way.
unidentified
I repeat, the scoops are on their way.
You will find out why Soylent Green means life.
You will find out why Soylent Green means death.
We've got to stop them!
That is the secret of Soylent Green.
Soylent Green is people!
dr jane ruby
I absolutely adore those clips of watching Owen shout down that creep, Beto O'Rourke.
I just never get tired of seeing those clips.
You're back in the War Room with Dr.
Jane Ruby today. We're starting the second hour of the War Room podcast.
Happy to sit in for Owen today, one of my heroes.
And I am really thrilled to be chatting this segment with an amazing guy, successful trial lawyer, author of numerous books, Norm Pattis.
Norm, thanks for coming into the show today.
I'm really excited to have you.
norm pattis
It's always a pleasure to be here.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, it's great to be able to chat with you a little bit.
You know, I know that probably the biggest thing you're involved in right now is that you filed this lawsuit up in Connecticut to stop forced vaccinations.
And I think people are really interested in that because all over the country, there's a lot of this situation, employers, schools, colleges.
It's just unending.
We just can't seem to get out from under this.
So tell us about the lawsuit up in Connecticut.
norm pattis
Connecticut is one of a growing number of states which have eliminated the religious exemption for school children on vaccinations, thus requiring all kids who are now entering schools to be vaccinated or be homeschooled.
Our view is, you know, we are a government of limited powers, and there are certain fundamental rights reserved to the people, and the First Amendment makes clear that freedom of religion is one of them.
We don't think the state should be able to say to a parent, you cannot have your child educated in a public school unless you sacrifice your religious beliefs.
So we've filed one lawsuit.
We've got a second on the way. The first lawsuit is in federal court, and we're challenging this law on First Amendment grounds.
Then we're going to file in state court an identical lawsuit challenging the religious exemption under state constitutional grounds.
I expect difficult sailing ahead.
You know, it's going to be a tough fight.
But it's a fight we're waging.
And my view is, you know, I stand with Antigone.
You remember the great play from Sophocles.
Her brother defined Creon, the king, and the king decided that he could not be buried.
It was inconsistent with the law.
And Antigone said, I'm going to bury my brother because there are some laws more fundamental than you, Mr.
Creon, Mr. King. And our obligations to gods and to the gods supersede those to the state.
And so I'm going to stand with limited government and fight for these people.
dr jane ruby
You know, Norm, I know you mentioned that you expect it to be an uphill climb, probably for a lot of reasons.
But after November 3rd and after what we saw, we saw the Supreme Court appear to fold, even though there was a conservative majority.
And I mean, do we have any courts left?
I mean, do you have any confidence in the federal court system?
norm pattis
Any court system? Clarence Darrow, the famous American lawyer of the last century, once said there is no justice in or out of court.
And so I stand with Darrow.
But I believe that the fight is all there is.
And that even if you are destined to lose, like Satan in Paradise Lost, you still wage the fight and you wage it on behalf of human dignity.
Do we have courts left?
Yeah, we have courts. Do we have courts that are prepared to honor our constitutional heritage and say that there is no public health exception to the Bill of Rights?
Coming out of the pandemic, I don't know.
But here's what really terrifies me about the pandemic.
In state after state, instance after instance, executive power has expanded at the cost of individual liberty.
And we said, well, it was an emergency.
Well, the emergency is now over and the legal doctrines still exist and other people will try to impress these legal doctrines into their service.
Are handguns a public health emergency?
Okay, suspend the Second Amendment.
Is systemic racism a public emergency?
The CDC says so.
So what will we do in the name of that?
Is climate change an emergency?
Well, maybe we should, you know, I don't know, do whatever.
The legislation is required there.
Make AOC the green czarina of the United States.
I do not want to live in a republic where virtuous people tell me how I must behave.
No one gets out of here alive.
The point is not to live, but to live well.
I'm sorry to be a font of quotes today, but that's Socrates, and I believe it.
I think if you look at our literature in the Western tradition, what we want is significance.
And significance comes in making our own choice and facing the bleakness of the world in the ways that best make sense to us in our communities.
I do not want the government cramming virtue down my throat, and I'll fight it with every breath of life that I have.
dr jane ruby
Well, you really hit the nail, I mean, when you said that, you know, I mean, essentially we're being gaslighted into everything's an emergency.
And, you know, tyrants have, as long as we're, you know, using history, tyrants have never been known to ever, you know, relinquish liberty back to the people for whatever reason they took it away to begin with.
It has to be taken back by revolution.
And so I fear that we're just too civilized.
And like you said, you know, but we do have the fight.
And I just wonder, you know, if you're facing this battle of actually just on the First Amendment, freedom of religion, which was supposedly rock solid and established, what techniques or what, you know, not necessarily, I don't want to get into the weeds, but really what philosophical approach are you, do you think you're going to use to try to overcome the fact that it's being subverted?
norm pattis
Yeah. I think that there are several moves available on the board.
One would be an appeal to tradition, and that is traditionally we've had limited government and the Bill of Rights has been incorporated or used against the states for a century now to make certain rights fundamental.
That's a harder move to make with the passage of each generation.
And the fight over the judiciary is real.
Because there are jurists who want to talk about a so-called living constitution needing to bend in the prevailing winds of whatever the impulse of the moment is.
The problem is those impulses change from time to time.
They're like tastes in fashion.
Something's in fashion one generation and not the next.
Our founders created a government that was to guarantee liberty for all time.
That was to protect majorities from a mob.
A mob of self-righteous individuals.
And there is no mob quite so terrifying as a self-righteous mob.
So there is the appeal to tradition.
And then there's just that God-loving appeal of ordinary people who want to breathe free.
You know, I'm finally out and about after the pandemic.
And I've been around the country a little bit.
LA, Seattle, here in Austin.
I'm from New England.
I see a great restiveness, a great restlessness in the American people.
All right, you scared the hell out of us.
We stayed home for a year.
We lost our jobs.
We lost our businesses. We lost a year of our life.
And now you're telling me I have to keep giving?
At what point do I stop giving and start taking it back?
I think we the people will take it back.
And I think that going to court, that's what I can do.
You know, there are other things.
I see protests and whatnot, you know, and people can protest.
I'm a courtroom lawyer.
So while I have breath, I will go to court and I will say to the judge, here's our law, here's our tradition.
We didn't vote to have it suspended.
Do your job. Set my people free.
dr jane ruby
Right. Absolutely. I wish you well in this because, you know, you said something that caught my ear also a few minutes ago.
You said after the pandemic, I'm not sure, you know, that we'll be able to get back to where we were in terms of liberties, individual rights, things like that.
Absolutely.
Absolutely. I mean, we've half lost it already.
norm pattis
But I mean, you know, there is good news if you take the long view.
You know, and after, you know, we've had pandemics throughout our history.
There was a pandemic in 6th century, you know, in Justinian's time, in London in the 17th century, you know, there was the Black Death that lasted for so long.
Sure. After each pandemic, there is a sort of cleansing of the public palate.
People wake up once again, and they revolt against existing government.
Because in fairness to existing government, you know, the government wasn't prepared for this.
They made choices, and those choices are always bad choices.
And so now the people have a chance to rise up.
Look at 2022.
Do not squander that election.
My advice to people is develop a handshake economy.
Meet your neighbor. Say, I'm happy to see you again.
Shake their hand. If you got to wash it afterwards, okay, go ahead.
But shake hands.
Meet people. Go to the polls.
Organize. Fight back.
dr jane ruby
Norm, you got a lot more faith in the leadership than I do, my friend.
But anyway, great to see you.
Norm Pettis. Find his books online.
The majority of Americans just don't get enough magnesium.
And Alex has gone to the trouble of putting together a really cool product called Fizzy Magnesium Formula.
It's tasty, it sounds good, sweet, and it's a true ionic magnesium.
And there are a lot of great things available right now in the Infowars.com store, or store.com, apologies.
Check it out, because I understand the Memorial Day sales are still live and running, and you can catch a lot of great products.
There's a whole list of them, so I'll mention them a I wanted to...
This is Jane Ruby, by the way.
Really happy to be back.
We are in the second hour of the War Room.
You're here with me.
Stay with me for the rest of the show because you just won't believe my next guest in the next segment.
Just unbelievable.
I am in for Owen Schroyer today.
Really excited. I wanted to talk about, in this particular segment...
The show is really pretty much thematically around how we are under attack.
Our children are under attack.
We're under attack by the schools, the government, these pharmaceutical companies.
Everybody's pushing the jab like it's the second coming.
And people are sick and they're dying.
And they're living these realities day to day, no matter how much the vaccine adverse event reporting system tries to hide this stuff, as our last guest showed us.
Albert Benvenides, who's been tracking it.
They can't wipe out these everyday people that are suffering and living with the adverse events.
And it's in real time, too.
There's just a frightening reality of the numbers, especially when you multiply them.
And we are catching up to the Europeans because we're catching up in terms of numbers of jabs.
I want to bring to your attention someone who came to mind in the last day or two.
Her name is Brittany Galvin.
She's a housewife, a mother, a wife of a Florida state trooper.
She lives down here in South Florida.
I'm going to make it a point to actually meet her if she's up to it.
She took the jab on May 5th.
She deeply regrets it.
You know, we can't be judgmental.
People are sucked into these things, these poisons.
There's a lot of pressure right now.
She is chronicling her journey through this experience, and it's going to blow your mind when you see what she's suffering through.
So we have a clip.
It's clip three. If the producers could roll it, and I'll fill you in a little bit more on the other side of this video.
She's actually set this up herself so that people could see what's going on.
unidentified
Where are all these metal objects sticking?
Oh my god.
Oh.
There's something wrong with me.
Why are all these metal objects sticking?
I'm out.
Oh my god.
you There's something wrong with me.
Where are all these metal objects?
dr jane ruby
Now, what you've seen is this magnetic phenomenon.
I've seen it in a lot of people.
This woman has done a number of these videos where she's had doctors and nurses, and she's been hospitalized in and out since the beginning of May, and she's had doctors and nurses do it so that they could attest to the fact that there wasn't a trick going on.
And I tried to actually get her on the show today.
I wanted to talk to her.
I'm afraid for her, for her life, for the rest of her health.
And so I reached out to her as soon as I found out about her.
It took me, you know, quite a while.
And then she was able to respond.
She's still in the hospital. She is supposed to leave today from this particular visit.
They're not finding anything, which is the heartbreaking part.
And so I had her clip, which she's put out in the public domain, and I've looked at some of the other ones.
Her name is Brittany Galvin.
So something is going on.
I can't explain it scientifically to you, but I promise you that as soon as I can, I'm going to let you know.
I wanted to share with you also, there's a, before we put the photo up, don't hold off on the photo, there's a guy, this is a terrible story, there's a man named Joel Kelman.
He was, he worked for Oracle, and he designed, believe it or not, the CDC vaccine app, tracker app.
He, you know, believed in everything, drank the Kool-Aid, and he, I believe he was injected March 24th.
Go ahead and put his tweet up.
That would be photo number five.
I wanted you to see his tweet because he very proudly, you know, he put together that V-Safe app, and he says in the In the tweet, I got my shot today.
I'm honored and incredibly proud to be part of this whole thing.
Let me read to you what happened.
Mr. Kelman tweeted or retweeted someone just five more times since this particular tweet you're seeing on the screen.
With his last tweet appearing on March 29th, he completely vanished thereafter.
Mr. Kalman averaged 44 tweets per month since June 2020, with a low of 13 tweets in August and a high of 64 in October.
Thus, his disappearance was unusual when he dropped off the radar as it relates to his normal social activity levels.
Just to remind the audience, the Moderna experimental mRNA shot, which is what he took, Requires the second dose 28 days after the first.
Pfizer, their experimental jab, calls for a second dose after 21 days.
That means that his second injection would have been around April, between April 17th and April 24th.
So-called full immunity, and I've told you before, it's not a vaccine.
It doesn't confer immunity. Put that aside for a moment.
So-called full immunity would then be on May 24th at the latest.
Just to give you the latest update, I'm sorry to say that Mr.
Kelman passed away on May 25.
He is survived by his wife of 27 years and their 16-year-old son.
I just dropped.
I mean, I just, I almost can't sleep at night listening to these stories.
And I wanted to share with you that Here are the real people that are going through this really quickly.
Lisa Shaw, a 44 year old BBC radio voice died in the hospital after suffering blood clots after receiving the AstraZeneca shot.
Lisa Stonehouse, a 52 year old Canadian woman developed blood clots in the brain and was dead 12 days after her AstraZeneca shot.
Lynnae Eric, a 50-year-old Canadian woman, is dead seven years after the experimental Pfizer mRNA injection.
Jennifer Gibson, a Canadian woman, developed Bell's palsy two weeks after the AZ shot.
Jovita Moore, an Atlanta news anchor, two brain tumors 12 days after the Pfizer shot.
And Mr. Kelman, who worked on the app tracker and proud to get the shot, is dead.
I'm telling you, just wait.
This is a flu that is basically gone, and if it does pop around with a variant, it's going to be mild.
There's a 100% chance of recovery.
Please don't let this happen to the children.
They're about to jab hundreds of thousands of children across this planet.
It is irreversible.
You can't get it out.
And it is going to destroy them before they live their natural lives.
Hashtag, just wait.
This is Jane Ruby.
I'm in the war room today, in for Owen Schroer.
When we come back, Dr.
David Martin is going to blow your mind with everything he's put together on this attack.
It is a worldwide attack.
On humanity. This is Jane Ruby.
Thanks for joining me in the War Room today.
I'm in for Owen Schroyer and we're covering a whole multitude of topics under the rubric that we are under attack by our own fellow man.
My next guest, you may remember him from my interview with him on the Alex Jones Show a few weeks ago, is going to blow your mind.
This man has just an incredible perspective on what's happening And understands that we are actually being distracted from what's happening today.
Dr. David Martin, I am so excited to have you back with me here today in the War Room.
dr david martin
Jane, it is an honor to be back.
Thank you so much.
It's a delight to see you again.
dr jane ruby
Hi, how are you?
It's just great to be with you.
You know, I did something very intelligent this time around.
I invited you, and luckily you agreed, to a longer segment because I think there's a lot to say.
We're going to speak a little bit about a recent presentation you made.
You were kind enough to send us The video from that, there was so much information where you basically answered the question, how did we get where we are today?
But to start a little bit, I thought maybe just to reorient, this is a podcast and people are listening, some are watching.
Let's give them a little bit of an introduction into what you've been doing, your background, so they understand just the amazing greatness of what you're sharing with all of us.
dr david martin
Well, Jane, going back to as far back as the 1980s, I have been involved in conducting investigations into The stories that we are being told and the difference between reality and propaganda.
That began when we heard about the war on drugs and we found out that what we were really doing as a nation was drug dealing to support a number of covert operations.
And I have been involved ever since then in doing investigations into very unpopular topics.
Your viewers will be able to look and see that back in the late 90s and early 2000s, that involved going in and busting up a bunch of tax frauds.
Collusion between the United States government and certain corporations.
But in 1998, a very important thing happened.
We started looking at violations of biological and chemical weapons treaties and specifically the way in which our government was taking a rather loose view of the weaponization of biological material.
And our concern, as your viewers from the previous show will recall, Our concern was that in 1999, coronavirus was thought by Anthony Fauci and NIAID to have promise as a potential mechanism to develop an AIDS vaccination vector.
And the beginning of what has become the weaponization of coronavirus began with Ralph Baric at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, under the funding of NIAID and Anthony Fauci.
And we have been following that ever since.
So since 1999, we have been on top of the investigation that now has become socially acceptable to talk about, almost, which is the fact that coronavirus was not a bat escape.
Coronavirus was a human manipulation.
dr jane ruby
Right. Absolutely. And, you know, I want to, we have some fair amount of time and I want to talk about Dr.
Fauci and some of this, you know, he just has committed so much perjury on Capitol Hill.
I just can't believe he's not in a federal prison, but we'll get to that.
You know, you really have presented some fascinating concepts recently.
One of the things I thought might be really interesting for you to share is take a few minutes and talk about the institutionalization of medicine and life insurance.
Can you speak to that for a couple of minutes?
dr david martin
Yeah, well, this is a very nasty story and we don't talk about it.
But, you know, if you go back and you look at the founding of this country in 1750s, this country became a hotbed for life insurance.
And the concept of it was very simple.
If you're going to build an economy and you're going to build a consumer based economy, what you're going to realize is that over a period of the average life expectancy of a person who Up until, if you go back and you look at the turn of the last century, so the turn into the 20th century in the late 1800s, early 1900s, the average life expectancy of the average male or female was 46 to 48 years, respectively.
And what we had was the proliferation of life insurance as a primary economic driver of our economy.
People don't ever go back and look at the fact that from 1880...
Until the present.
We actually have seen the growth of the financial services industry generally growing to represent somewhere between 20 and 25% of our GDP. But the more insidious part of that is the interlocking directorates, which in 1907 were examined by the US Congress by an enormous number of Of other interested parties and was found to be the, in fact, fundamental rot that was going to destroy this country.
And in the 1907 to 1911 period, we had public inquiries into what were called interlocking directorates.
It was the way in which the life insurance companies were, in fact, determining the future of everything from railroads to banks to industry, etc., And the problem that we have is that we have an economy that was built on death, not on life. And it's the management of death, the ability to manage the duration that people live, which ultimately became the fuel that in 1914 was used to justify the formation of the eugenics program in the United States.
Andrew Carnegie endowing the Cold Spring Harbor Labs, which is where all of what we know to be genetic research proliferated from 1914 until DNA's discovery in the 1950s.
All of that eugenics research was being done at the behest of individuals who had an economic interest in controlling life, but more importantly, the timing of death.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, in fact, you reminded me of actually my favorite book in college, which was a book by C. Wright Mills called The Power Elite, where he tried to warn about interlocking directorates.
I hadn't thought about that in years until I saw your presentation.
And you've kind of tied that all into controlling death as a business.
You also shared something about mortgages, that they were 30 years for a reason when they first started out.
We've got a couple of minutes. Can you speak to that for a minute before we go to break?
dr david martin
Yeah, well, I ask financial experts all the time, how did we pick a 30-year duration?
And the answer is everybody comes back and says, well, we have no idea.
Well, the fact of the matter is we do have an idea.
We built an obsoleting credit instrument to support real estate.
And we built it specifically because the average life expectancy of the blue collar worker in the 1900s was 30 years.
That was the productive life of a person.
And it turns out that if you target a credit facility to reach almost to its maturity,
but not all the way at the life expectancy or the productive expectancy of an individual,
what you find is that banks, having made money on loans to mortgages for the entirety of
a person's useful life, wound up foreclosing on or foreclosing in large part on real estate
just in this beautiful moment, just a few moments before a person died.
We have to remember that the term mortgage itself is in fact a death guarantee.
Mort, the French word death, is actually the structure of why we called them mortgages
in the first place.
They were guarantees about the life and the life productivity.
Of an individual. We say these words, we pay attention to them not a bit.
And the problem is, this has been done under our nose.
This has been about the controlled manipulation of life and the timing of death.
It has not been about the betterment of humanity or life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
This is about death and the profiteering that comes from controlling the fear of death.
dr jane ruby
It's so eye-opening.
Once you lay it out, it just makes perfect sense.
And the whole life insurance issue, it's a moneymaker and cashing in on someone's death.
There are a lot of other issues and topics That came out of your talk.
And I know that a little bit later, maybe a segment or two later, we're going to get to a couple of clips and you can maybe speak to it directly.
Very good. And we can give everyone the link to it because it's absolutely fascinating.
It's worth it.
We are in the war room with Dr.
Jane Ruby in for Owen Schroyer.
You're back in the war room with Dr.
Jane Ruby today.
We're in the middle of the second hour.
We're honored to have Dr.
David Martin with us.
Dr. Martin, I wanted to pick up a little bit where we left off in the last segment.
Another area that you spoke about in that presentation, I don't want to make the whole interview about the presentation, I want you to have some time to talk about what your latest stuff is, but it was so captivating, I have to tell you, from an historic and eye-opening point of view, but you educated the audience about the DNA model, and I know that's a lot for a seven or eight minute segment, but The DNA model versus chromosomes and all that was a fascinating part.
Can you say a little bit about that and explain what that was about?
dr david martin
Yeah, Dr. Jane, it's important for people to understand that the reason why DNA is called a model is because it's a model.
It is actually not reality.
It's not the way things exist in nature.
If you look at what happens inside of a cell and you go back to the very beginning, the first divide of the first cell where you have a sperm and an egg come together and actually begin the process of what we determine to be life, what happens is chromosomes, which are these wound chemical, magnetic, very interesting structures, We carry with them information from the mother and the father and those things become replicated in the cells.
And what happens is that a complex interaction between these chemicals that we think of in a purely chemistry sense and the actual field structure of those things actually interact to begin the process of what we call living.
The funny thing is that when in 1953 and 1954 we started defining life to be made up of the double helix, what we call DNA, what was missing was that the actual nature of the organic material itself exists in chromosomes.
These are entangled chemical structures and as entangled chemical structures that have charges They are in fact more aptly described as an antenna than they are as a genetic recipe.
Now, what's the danger that we have when we decide to take nature as it exists in chromosomes and untie it, stretch it out, turn it into these strands that we refer to as DNA, which, by the way, as a chemical does in fact Exists as a molecule, but the way it exists in nature is not only a wound helix, which is the model that we see, but it's folded on itself.
And it turns out that information is contained in the folds as well.
Information is received in the folds as well.
It turns out that if you put cells into magnetic fields, what happens inside of the replication in chromosomes is altered.
What expresses from those replications is also altered.
And by making the mistake that somehow or another life is a biochemical formula, a recipe if you will, what we've done is we've made ourselves subject to To this crazy storyline that says that this is some sort of computer code, that life is reduced to essentially digital ones and zeros.
And the fact of the matter is, that model is in fact nothing more than that.
It's a model. I'm not saying that there isn't elements of science and truth inside of it.
But what I know is that the living system itself does not have DNA and RNA. The living system itself has these wound, beautifully complex structures that contain not only the chemistry of life, but also the frequency of life.
And that is a distinction that all of the biochemical obsession since 1954 has lost.
We have forgotten that we are not just a chemical formula.
We are an energetic being.
We are alive, intuitive, sensing being.
And what we've done is we've taken it all apart and then we build models that then build disease around The strands rather than looking at the complexity of the elegance of life.
And any scientist who says that they understand DNA will tell you that we only have understood, in the human genome, we only understand less than 5% of the genome.
Well, if you only understand 5%, you know that the doctor in front of your name and the doctor in front of my name includes research that tells us that 0.05 It's a very important number.
If we can't make sense of more than 5% of a thing, then what we do understand is nothing at all.
dr jane ruby
Right. Now, can you...
That was beautifully laid out.
Can you distill that down for us in terms of what the implication is for these mRNA vaccines?
dr david martin
Well, so the myth is that if it's just a chemistry, we can put a recipe that's a computer-generated synthetic chimeric Computer recipe, which is what gets injected into people.
There's no biology in this.
This is chemistry. And it's chemistry from a computer simulation, not from reality.
When that gets injected into a person, the computer code synthesizes a pathogen, a spike protein, a foreign body.
That is synthesized by the body.
A toxin is developed.
And what we're told by the manufacturers...
Is that this is safe.
That it is safe to do it.
But here's the problem. If you understand only the chemistry of this without understanding the field effect of it, you could be very correct in what you represent to be true about the chemistry, but you could be missing entirely the effects that it has In terms of other energy that is in fact impacted by these introductions of pathogens, proteins that are being synthesized by the body that were never meant to be synthesized by the human body.
The human body was never, ever, ever meant to synthesize coronavirus spike proteins, but that is what we are being told is in fact a vaccine.
As I've said many times, it is not.
It's a palliative treatment for symptoms.
It has nothing to do with the control of the pathogen.
And it ultimately leads to the human body producing a toxin that the human body never was intended to produce.
dr jane ruby
Can you say, can you make the connection to these magnetic phenomena that are happening?
I just in the previous segment before you came on showed a woman in South Florida who's chronicling her unfortunate journey.
And she just now, not just on the site where the material was injected, but also now all over her body, if she puts something on, you can see the pull.
It pulls onto her skin.
What is going on there?
dr david martin
Do we know? Well, the answer is we don't know.
And the problem is that we don't have a good picture of all of the ingredients that are going into the injections that are being done.
And we need to make sure that we're clear on the fact That what we do know is in the case of the mRNA vaccines, these are the Moderna and the Pfizer vaccines.
In both cases, these are actually not vaccinations under the legal term.
These are palliative treatments to lessen symptoms.
They have nothing to do with the transmission or the control of a virus infection.
And it's really important that we keep saying that because people are missing that point over and over again.
This is a palliative care option, which ultimately has a bunch of harm.
But what we're not being told is all of the components that have gone into understanding what happens once that RNA goes into the body.
We do know that it does alter A number of behaviors of the way in which blood and, as you know, blood containing iron has a very significant magnetic property option that can show up in a variety of ways.
What we do not know at this point in time is we do not know all of the components that have gone into the vaccinations and as a result, it is actually impossible to explain all of the phenomenon other than to say That we as beings are in fact complex energetic beings.
We have fields.
We have electromagnetic fields.
We have all sorts of things.
And the alteration of that by the introduction of a pathogen is always going to be subject to a series of considerations that were not even thought about in the clinical trial.
These clinical trials were done in haste.
They did not consider the broader field effects of what might be happening and as a result we're going to see a lot of side effects that we have no idea their etiology simply because we have not really been told what the injection actually contains and I will come back and conclude this segment by reminding people This is not a vaccine the way you think of vaccines.
Vaccines the way we were taught to think of them were attenuated or altered viruses.
This is a protein computer code that makes your body create a pathogen.
That's what it is, and we need to be clear on the fact that we do not understand the long-term consequence of that.
dr jane ruby
Thank you so much for distilling that down.
It's so important. I'm very worried about children in this next wave.
They're trying to set up all these programs to hit children with this.
We'll be back with Dr.
David Martin in the next segment.
And this is Jane Ruby.
Thanks for joining me.
This is Dr. Jane Ruby in for Owen today.
We're talking with Dr.
David Martin, who is just a phenomenal human being and has done some incredible work.
Dr. Martin, so we're lucky enough to have you for this segment and one more after it.
And so I wanted to give you an opportunity to take a segment.
This one is going to be about four minutes long.
I want you to talk about, we will in the last segment get to, you know, one of your books and I want to talk about Fauci and all that, but I wanted you to have a segment to share, you know, what's on your mind because I know you're involved in so many incredible things right now.
unidentified
What do you think? Well, Thanks.
dr david martin
And Jane, it's so good to be here.
Thank you so much for having me back.
It's a delight to spend time with you.
What we're doing right now is two things.
One of the things that has been exceptionally important over the last, now, several months is that the growing chorus of critique of Anthony Fauci, of the actions taken by CDC and other things, Have finally landed in certain members of the United States Senate, certain members of the Congress and certain other jurisdictions where an enormous amount of work needs to be done on getting people up to speed on the actual information.
And so, as you know, we have been working to disseminate the information that we compiled into the Fauci dossier Yeah, I think.
In every space.
And what we've done is we've gone to the United States Senate.
We've sat down with senators and we've briefed people up.
And the good news is we're starting to see some pressure being put on Anthony Fauci and others because of that work.
So we're very buoyed by that.
But we've got another problem.
And that problem is that there are a huge number of really wonderful patriots around this country and citizens of countries around the world who are saying we must do something different We must engage in something different.
And so what my wife Kim and I are doing is we're starting a series of engagements around the country where we're talking about, much like we did in California, what were the foundations that got us to this corrupt space?
How did we as a society get here?
How did the Tocqueville, you know, great American experiment get so hijacked and so We're overcome by forces of evil.
And what we're doing is taking people on a journey through an examination of how we got here so that when we build what's coming next, we actually don't inadvertently include things that we shouldn't have done in the first place.
So beginning in the next couple days in South Dakota and then in Austin, Texas next week, we're going to have a series of events which are going to allow people to start examining what are the structural elements that we need to take on To allow us to build a better humanity.
And the Texas Nexus organization has done a fabulous job there in Austin of bringing together people to have a conversation about a future that humanity serves as a single and principal role where we actually celebrate values.
We celebrate the morals that turn us into our best selves rather than We're good to go.
Much like we did at Yuba City at the Church of Glad Tidings, which I have to give a shout out to Dave and Cheryl Bryant, the pastoral team there.
They were absolutely phenomenal, put together an enormously impactful conference.
And I just have a ton of respect for the fact that they stand for making sure that people are equipped to not only have this kind of ephemeral experience of a better experience of humanity and a sense of faith and purpose, They're putting it into real life and real practice.
And my participation with them last week was absolutely one of those life-affirming great moments.
We're super grateful for them and for what they're doing at the Church of Glad Tidings in Yuba City.
So a lot of stuff going on.
We're super grateful for it.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, I want people to download that Fauci dossier, but also they can get to that series of speeches at gladtidingschurch.com?
dr david martin
Yeah, yeah. Okay, great.
The Church of Glad Tidings.
dr jane ruby
We're back in the war room.
Thanks for joining me today.
I'm Dr. Jane Ruby, in for Owen Schroyer, and we are talking to Dr.
David Martin. Dr.
Martin, this is our fourth and last segment with you for today.
I wanted to ask you to say a little bit more about What this whole process and where this thing is going to end with Dr.
Fauci. You know, after November 3rd, I mean, we just saw our courts collapse.
We've seen all these agencies and institutions.
How do you maintain, and I know that of all people you will, how do you maintain optimism that he will be held accountable for the crimes against humanity that he's committed and many others like him?
He's not a lone wolf.
dr david martin
No, he's not alone.
But the fact of the matter, he's routinely perjuring himself.
Every time he opens his mouth now, including his most recent appearances where he's justifying the emails that were recently disclosed, he is actually and actively lying to the public.
And it's not a close call.
I'm not making an allegation that is based on some sort of highly subjective thing.
Point blank, he said last spring that the evidence showed that face masks do not work to protect a healthy population.
And then he wound up producing a mechanism whereby use of face masks was a mechanism to get people
to accept what was ultimately the long objective, which has been his objective since the last
at least seven years, which is how do we get to a pan-coronavirus vaccine, which is a gateway drug
into getting every single person to be habitually and chronically addicted to getting vaccination.
The fact of the matter is he has done nothing but lie.
He is not serving a public health interest.
He is a front for a chemical industry, and he is committing a series of perjured experiences
every time he gets in front of the camera, every time he opens his mouth.
And what we see is a giant apologist now that is the people who are saying that somehow or another,
you know, he's just kind of a innocent old grandfather who needs to be accommodated.
And the fact of the matter, he's a mass murdering psychopath.
And we need to actually be clear on the fact that that is in fact what he is.
He is actually actively killing human beings.
And that smiling face that everybody's pumping up is a smiling face of an actively criminal individual.
And the crimes, as we laid out in the Fauci dossier, are felonies that involve making sure
that you spend the rest of your life and your fortune actually in prison for felonies.
The reason I am constantly optimistic to answer your question is that I see time after time That in every instance of human experience, these individuals ultimately are found to be exactly what they are.
And I think it's going to take more deaths.
The fact of the matter is, I think that there are going to be a lot of people who are going to lose their life because of actions that he is taking.
But the great news is, at some point, we the people will see the breakpoint and he will be held accountable.
dr jane ruby
Wow. Well, I've called him the Dr.
Mengele of our time, right in front of our faces, just like the first Mengele was.
You know, I'd like to shift gears a little bit.
You know, that's all a lot of heavy stuff, but it's all important information that people need to know and to get your take on these things.
And I hope people will follow you.
You know, we've been putting your websites up alongside your name, so I hope people do get a chance.
Maybe you could mention those as well.
But I wanted to shift to your, is it your latest book, Lizards Eat Butterflies?
Yeah. Let's talk a little bit about that because it's not a children's book, even though it sounds like it.
But, you know, I think it's for adults.
But the subtitle is An Antidote to the Self-Help Addiction.
So tell us a little bit about that.
dr david martin
Yeah, listen, and this is a perfect way to end the segment.
We have lost our picture of what a good humanity is.
We're so surrounded by negative programming and then we adopt these stories of everything that's wrong with us and wrong with our relationships and wrong with so many things.
We spend so much time obsessing about what's wrong that we don't have a picture of what a good humanity would look like.
And so what I did was I took Plato's Republic And I essentially recast the 11 sections of Plato's Republic In a conversation in 2021, which is how would we get to a place where we the people would actually have a picture of what it would be to live in a way that wasn't living out someone else's narrative.
Most of what passes off as self-help is actually people encouraging others to acquiesce to a system, to actually rationalize a substandard way to live.
And what Lizards Eat Butterflies does is it is a very inelegant, very in-your-face story about the stories we've all been conditioned to accept as reality.
And then how, if we break free from that, We wind up having an experience that allows us to finally step into accountability for all of the things that we are and all the things that we think and all the things that we do.
At the end of the day, Jane, this is about making sure that we stop blaming the someone or something out there and we start taking accountability and responsibility for the way we show up in this world.
If we're prepared to do that, We actually will have a better humanity.
And if we're not prepared to do that, we'll replace one tyrant for another.
Because as long as we look outward for the government, the hero, the savior, the whatever else, as long as our eyes are fixed on that horizon, we will miss the point that we are the people that we've always been waiting for.
Just like this conversation, two people who share a passion for life, who share a passion for liberty, If we show that we can fearlessly engage in conversations where we're not second-guessing, we're not wondering, oh, should I say this or should I not say that?
If you're offended by a thing I said, guess what?
I own it.
I said it. But I take accountability and responsibility for how I show up and it's time that we all do.
So the book is really an indelicate way of saying enough with the blame game.
Let's start growing up, putting our pants on one leg at a time and being the humans that we want to see on this planet.
dr jane ruby
You know, and I think it's really timely, too, because when I think about, and I tie this back to, you know, my whole thing about let's protect the children from these jabs, I see a lot of parents on social media saying things like, how much longer are they going to make our children do this?
And, you know, do you believe it?
And all this pearl clutching.
Hey, take charge of your life.
Take charge of your child's life.
Is that where this book helps people go?
dr david martin
Exactly. And remember that none of us would transact our life.
None of us would do it if the real story was told.
If we were really told that this was not about infection control.
If we were really told that in 2016, this was about getting society to accept a pan-coronavirus vaccine, and let's go back and remember that wonderful quote from Peter Daszak, that this was about creating media hype.
This was about an entire process where a key driver was the media and the economics will follow the hype.
We need to use that hype to our advantage.
This was in 2016.
There is not a single public health motivation for what is being called a vaccine right now.
This is about getting humans to be addicted to a system that will never let them be free.
And my commitment is, just like your commitment, is to make sure that every ounce of breath and energy we have goes into making sure that people are fully informed.
Because if in 2016, when none of us were talking about coronavirus, the architect of this system was funding a program where he explicitly said, this is about creating media hype.
We cannot second guess anything beyond that.
We have been had, society has been duped, and we must, must call this out because there are lives at stake.
It's time for us to stand for humanity, and I'm grateful that you are doing that.
I'm passionate about it.
You're passionate about it.
I'm glad that we've had this chance to catch up.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, we've both, I'm sure we've both taken a lot of hits for it.
You know, because I mean, I don't know about you, but I mean, I'll be honest, I've lost friends and some, a couple of family members along the way, who are just, you know, want me to just settle down and be quiet.
But I can't do that.
I can't do that. And it has nothing to do with having children or grandchildren.
It's really more about, you know, humanity.
It's about the next generation and beyond.
So, I really appreciate your take.
Thanks for staying with me. This is Dr.
Jane Ruby in for Owen Schroer today in the War Room.
Just wrapping up a wonderful, really educational, insightful hour with Dr.
David Martin, who's phenomenal and his work is just far-reaching.
Dr. Martin, you know, you work with folks like Robert Kennedy Jr.
and a lot of other heavyweights like yourself.
What's going to come next?
Is that too broad of a question?
What's coming down the pike in terms of a lot of the collaborating that you're doing with some of these other great humanitarians like yourself?
dr david martin
I think one of the things that's going to be probably the big public conversation Visible conflict is going to be what happens with what we're doing with children.
The fact of the matter is, from a public health standpoint, there is no justification at all for introducing an untested technology into the lives and into the biologies of young people.
I am particularly concerned, but not uniquely, but particularly concerned with the effect of what we're doing on young women because I think that the nature of any experimental therapy should be examined over an exceptionally long period of time.
We should not rush into things that could have an impact on reproductive health.
I can't imagine a parent or a grandparent We're good to go.
To actually have your children exposed to being guinea pig.
And as a result, what we're doing is we are increasing the heat and visibility on topics ranging from the manufacturing and the weaponization of the biosphere in the form of what actually happened in the creation of this particular pathogenic protein that we call the SARS-CoV-2 But we're also trying to bring visibility to the fact that the clinical trials are not being done consistently in the standard of clinical trials in the past.
I want to be very clear on the fact that it is absolutely incumbent that we do not harm our children who have no meaningful susceptibility to a SARS coronavirus infection.
It is unethical and it should be illegal.
To have our children subjected to emergency use authorization for a condition that in the majority of cases will never affect them at all.
This is not like polio.
This is not like mumps or measles or rubella.
This is a condition that affects typically the already infirm aging population and it has no business being clinically trialed or administered to young children.
And that is something that no parent and no grandparent should tolerate at all.
dr jane ruby
You know, you raise a really important point.
I myself have spent 20 years in pharmaceutical drug development.
I'm very well versed in the regulations, what's required to establish safety and efficacy in a new drug.
I am beside myself That they're plowing full speed ahead with, let's go further upstream from the child and talk about injecting pregnant women like there's no tomorrow.
That is just verboten.
I mean, if you can't test it in them, in the fetus, then you don't give it to them.
And there was never an ethical justification to test it in them.
So they always kind of sat in what's called category C, where you just don't give it on the package label.
I just don't understand.
Do you have any insight into how they got past traditional, critical, do we no longer have an FDA? I mean, what's going on in there?
dr david martin
Well, remember that this was all architected ahead of time.
This is all taking advantage of the PrEP Act.
This is all taking advantage of the fact that in 2016, NIAID decided that we needed to find a way to to actually force people into a mandatory and universal vaccination regime.
And part of the problem was all of us who were informed consumers We saw that despite all of the promotion of the influenza vaccine, we still had influenza.
As a matter of fact, if we go back and look at years like 2017 and 2018, we had very deadly forms of influenza outbreaks despite the rampant march to try to immunize people because the fact of the matter is influenza immunizations were not working.
And so rather than trying to force the issue Of getting the immunizations for influenza to be mandated to be universal, which is what Anthony Fauci started off trying to do.
He and others realized that they had to invent a pathogen that then could be used to justify a mandatory and universal vaccine.
This coronavirus thing, and that's why I keep coming back to that Peter Daszak quote, this was a hype pandemic.
To create a mandate.
It was not a public health crisis.
dr jane ruby
Right, right, right.
One quick question. In the two minutes we have you, roughly.
In your mind, is there any pathway that you see for science to come up with some miracle to reverse or remove this material from someone's body and stop them from producing these pathogenic spikes?
dr david martin
Well, listen, I am aware of some clinical trials that are going on right now with individuals that I am very close to who are working on ways to train cells, specifically a T-cell variety to help deal with some of the potential side effects.
But the fact of the matter is, this is an unfortunate situation, Dr.
Jane, because it's important for all of us to understand The only responsible action people should take is to not get an experimental injection.
That's the only acceptable thing.
If you take that step and you move into the, well, I did it so I could travel, I did it for my job, I did it for whatever else.
The fact of the matter is the ship has sailed.
We do not know what happens with a protein synthesis that That is taking your body and turning it into a pathogen manufacturing machine.
We have no concept of the long-term health effects of that.
But I'm going to tell you, that's an experiment that this body is not going to take.
And I'm going to tell you, the value of the conversations like the one we're having right now are we will stop some people from falling for this thing.
And unfortunately, there are people who have taken it.
And I highly recommend, you know, being loving, compassionate, respectful for the fact that they let this overwhelming propaganda and fear take control.
But the fact of the matter is, we must stand united against turning human beings into experimentation for industrial pharmaceutical medicine objectives and profit objectives alone.
And we have in their own words that that's what this was about.
dr jane ruby
Yeah, and it looks like we are going to have upwards of about 200 million people inoculated with this stuff.
So this is probably going to go well beyond our generation, our lifetimes, and the next one.
dr david martin
You and I are old enough to remember thalidomide.
We're old enough to remember, you know, DDT. We're old enough to remember a lot of things that the CDC said were safe, that the FDA said were safe.
The fact of the matter is, this is our generation's thalidomide.
It's our generation's, you know, this is our generation's experience with the horrors of industrial medicine.
dr jane ruby
Thank you so much, Dr.
Martin. Dr. David Martin, get his book.
Hey, it's called The War Room for a Reason.
This is Dr. Jane Ruby in for Owen today.
It's been a great almost three hours.
And with some great guests and always honored to be here.
I wanted to spend this segment talking a little bit more about the children and why this is so important and what some of the more recent findings are.
If you just do a little bit of digging, but we've actually done some of it for you.
When I say there's the coming destruction of children, I'm not being dramatic or cute just for the fun of it.
I'm telling you that that's the next power grab to kind of seal this whole thing off.
You know, we just spent basically almost an hour with Dr.
David Martin, who really laid out that this has been a long time in coming, really aligns with a lot of the predictions that Alex Jones has made over the years, for sure.
And then validating some of the numbers, I'm going to share even more numbers that were
given to me by our even earlier guest Albert Benvenides who's done a tremendous job taking
the VAERS portion of the CDC website, the Adverse Event Reporting System, and bringing
it to life and really showing us, if you will, that the likelihood and some of the proof
in fact that they are manipulating the numbers and they have to do that to keep you coming
to the trowel and to keep you succumbing to the pressure that you're getting from work
and school and friends and relatives and things like that.
So the reason our concern for children is ramping up is it started out of the signals
If you remember correctly, all of the information you've had, Israel ramped up their population to get the jab very, very early and very aggressively because they wanted to get they were driven to get to this vaccine passport, which they did.
And then all of a sudden, abruptly, like a week or two ago, They just dropped it.
And the reasons for that and sort of the background behind that is probably for another whole show.
But the importance of that is that because What I call safety signals.
We're getting clues and information.
We have a photo, and when the producers are able to bring up photo two, it shows as an article where they are, their big signal was the myocarditis in Israel, probably around the middle of April.
They were noticing that teens and young people were coming up, you know, with all of these cases of heart inflammation and heart infection.
And so they're making the link.
And I love how they say rare cases.
It's not rare when it's your kid and it's not rare when a great percentage of young people are getting myocarditis after getting the jab.
We've looked at these numbers.
It's really sad.
I mean, up to... In the age group of 12 to 17, for example, I'm going to read to you from the VAERS website.
This particular report went up to May 21st.
There were very few reports.
Remember, it's a self-reporting system, so it's not a perfect system.
You're not going to get every single adverse event as it hits.
But in any case, you know how the The injections, the vaccination program, if you will, the push, started with 75 years plus, then 65 to 75, then it went 45 to 65.
What we saw between 65 years and up to, above 75, probably up to 80 or 90 or 100, was probably about, during that time period of May 14 to May 21, we saw about 18 to 20 reports.
Interestingly, when they started moving it down to 44 to 65-year-olds, we saw about 25 reports.
It jumped incredibly when people between the ages of 18 and 44 began to get these jabs.
It jumped to 107.
So just when you look at patterns, you can see that the younger people The cohort group that is being jabbed, the greater the number of adverse events.
And this is why I'm putting this all call out.
This is why I'm concerned.
I'm worried for the children.
I'm worried that they're coming for the children.
Because when you get to the 12 to 17 year group, and remember, Pfizer just got their approval.
And Moderna, which actually we do have another photo, interesting, press release.
Conducted really a slapstick.
I wouldn't even call it a study, to be honest with you.
And they called it the Teen Cove Study.
They claim, they just put this out recently because they're drooling.
They're drooling at the money and the numbers as they watch Pfizer begin to jab 16 and 17-year-olds.
And so they put in their application and request to the FDA to expand the emergency use authorization
down to 12 to 17-year-olds.
So we're going to have the two mRNA injection treatments being driven toward 12 to 17-year-olds.
And in the next segment, I'm going to talk about doctors, particularly pediatricians.
You're going to be shocked when you learn how they're being used in this situation.
So what I want to call attention to is that there's no safety data.
The safety data has been very irresponsible, has not been done just as I spoke to Dr. Martin
in the last segment.
They did not do a randomized controlled version, in other words with a control arm of pregnant
women or a control arm meaning another arm or cohort paralleling that does not get the
injection so that you can compare and minimize especially placebo control when you pretend
to give it, you're really giving a blank to the control group.
They think they're getting it.
So you get to really match up and see if the treatment, the drug, the injection is really causing harm and or if it's effective.
So they did not do safety studies.
This is what I want to emphasize.
On pregnant women, they didn't do them in immunosuppressed people.
If someone gets a kidney transplant, Or a liver transplant or a lung transplant.
They're on medications, mostly for life, that suppress their natural immune responses so that the body won't reject that.
So those people are super compromised and yet they were not studied as a separate cohort.
The standard in pharmaceutical drug development is if you didn't test it in that group, You should not be giving it to that group and you should be warning physicians and other healthcare providers not to give it to them.
So Moderna is all a Twitter.
They're all excited.
They're giddy. They came out with their results.
And of course, they met 100% of their endpoints.
That's ridiculous. They literally moved those goalposts.
They created whatever endpoints they wanted, and that's why I kept asking Dr.
Martin about the FDA, because there isn't even a fox watching the henhouse.
I mean, nobody's watching the henhouse, and everything is flying through, whatever they want.
As I know you've seen on Alex's show prior, previously, in Pfizer's own document, they reported recently, or I think it was a leaked document, actually.
I tweeted about it a week or two ago.
They actually admit they've got a couple of tables for 12 to 17-year-olds I'm not sure how they did that without the emergency use authorization open yet to 12 to 17-year-olds, but somehow they did jab a chunk of them.
And then in their own leaked document, it showed that those children had those that were compared to a placebo arm.
And I'm not sure if that's a 12 to 17-year-old placebo arm or if it's just comparing it to the adult placebo arm, but that they had They had side effects, some serious, some mild, that were many times that of placebo.
Why is that important? Because in pharmaceutical drug development, one of the criteria is that your drug doesn't cause side effects more than a certain percentage or multiplier times placebo.
And it's usually not more than 2 or 3%.
And it's usually not more than maybe twice that of placebo.
But twice that of placebo or more is actually a huge red flag.
And I personally, as a former trial investigator, have stopped studies for interim analyses on safety for less than that.
So I wanted to call that to your attention.
I predict there's going to be an explosion of cardiac events in this new teen cohort
and many more deaths in 12 to 17 year olds.
It's going to, the group is getting younger, the danger is younger.
On the next segment, we'll be talking about the role doctors play in this whole incredible
crime against humanity.
And welcome back to the last segment of the last hour of the War Room.
I'm Jane Ruby, your host today in for Owen Schroer.
It's been a lot of fun.
We're in our last segment here, as I said.
And I'm really grateful to be able to get this information out and share it with you.
I hope you've gotten some new information from it.
I wanted to touch base on this topic of America's doctors because no one seems to be talking about them, but they are playing a huge role in getting these jabs out.
And I think that for any physician, knowing what we all know now, any physician to be pushing this, there's nothing to laugh at.
I've heard people say, well, you know, my doctor, boy, he's really pushing it.
It's crazy, isn't it? It's more than that.
You should be Shaming them for this.
For any doctor to be pushing these things, knowing what we know, as I said, they're either ignorant, which is grossly derelict in their duties, or they're complicit.
And I'll tell you how they can be complicit.
Doctors, I'm going to ask the producers to bring up, let's see.
Nope. We had, nope.
Hold off for a second.
I wanted to share that doctors are, I think I have photo six.
I take that back. Photo 6 is a tweet from someone who really nailed it.
And what she says is she's alerting people to the fact that pediatricians, because pediatricians will be recruited, and they are being recruited right now, to push this jab on you and your family and your children.
Five years ago, this had nothing to do with the COVID, right?
Five years ago, Blue Cross and Blue Shield paid doctors slash pediatricians a $40,000 bonus for fully vaccinating a minimum of 100 patients under the age of two years old.
So when that doctor says, oh, your child really needs this, you better take a second look.
You better double check what your child might really need or not.
And you better make sure you know what's in everything they're giving your child.
And if you look at the kind of little bold print on the lower right-hand corner, it says,
and this is really nefarious, under Blue Cross rules, Blue Shields rules,
pediatricians lose the whole bonus unless at least 63% of patients are fully vaccinated.
And that includes the flu vaccine.
So it's not just a $400 bounty on your child's head.
It could be the whole bonus they're losing.
So that's an incredibly powerful incentive.
And so I'm really concerned about it because I think doctors have an extra benefit.
Special or extra important, heavy responsibility to be researching this.
I had a recent experience where...
Because when I lived in Virginia a year ago, in D.C. for 10 years, I went to my doctor last year, when I got the natural COVID flu, he would not prescribe any of the existing medications.
A little hard to get that past me as a medical professional, but he fought me tooth and nail.
And someday soon I'm going to write him a letter and I'm going to lay him out in lavender because he's a disgusting representative of the medical profession.
But recently I found a new GP down here who seems to be very good, very open-minded.
However, she surprised me at the end of the examination and she said, you know, you really
ought to get that injection, that vaccination.
Well, she had actually said that to the wrong person because I'm not her average patient.
And of course, for the next 120 seconds, I proceeded to do the elevator speech and lay
out why no one should take these.
And you can imagine the look on her face was a total shock.
Her jaw dropped and she, I think she's really a good doctor and a good person because she
took a step back and said, oh my goodness, I guess I better go back and do some more
reading and reviewing.
And I said, yes, yes, you do need to do that because you're hurting your patients, your
other patients.
So I want to play a clip here because this is really important.
I'm not the only one who's noticed that America's doctors are off the hook because when this thing comes down, as Dr.
Martin predicted, a lot of your average family physicians are going to be under, I hope, criminal indictment for their negligence and for pushing this.
So when we're ready, let's go to clip, I believe it's labeled clip one.
We can do that. That's my take.
unidentified
Ignorant or evil? A message on very simple, available treatment to Americans and Canadians that could reduce hospitalization and death was actually being actively suppressed.
And I remember holding up the protocol.
I was just recovering from COVID-19 myself.
I was just 17 days after having COVID. I had a mask hanging off one ear and I held up my protocol.
I said, what's controversial about this?
Giving a little steroid medication?
We do that in asthma.
Or how about giving some blood thinners?
I'm a cardiologist. I give blood thinners all day long.
Why is it suddenly a controversy in COVID-19?
And in fact, the listeners realized it shouldn't be a controversy.
In fact, anybody who would attempt to block, impair, inhibit, discourage, or chill the early treatment of COVID-19 was actually In a sense, committing a medical crime.
In a sense, hurting individuals.
Every single pharmacist that blocked a prescription to a patient, that pharmacist was attempting to hurt that patient.
Every single doctor refused a patient treatment, told patient treatments didn't exist when in fact they do, or told the patient, I don't treat COVID-19, or told the patient to sit at home and wait till they become hospitalized and die.
Every single doctor who did that, and believe me, we have a million doctors in the United States, you probably have hundreds of thousands of doctors in Canada, all of them.
Committed a crime. They committed a sin.
They broke their Hippocratic oath to help patients, to care about them always, to help them.
And I tell you, those doctors have a long way to come crawling back.
A long way. And I tell you, most of them hang their heads in shame when I look at them.
To hold on to the position of denying compassionate care to patients And to create fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death is immoral, it's unethical, and in civil court it's illegal.
And all of you will be hunted.
Every single one of you listening right now will be hunted.
And justice will be served.
These are considered crimes against humanity.
dr jane ruby
That's one of my personal all-time heroes, Dr.
Peter McCullough. You can find him online as well.
He's a national treasure and a hero, and he's right.
And I do hope all of those doctors who are probably responsible for hundreds of thousands of reactions and deaths because they either didn't look into it or because they took a bribe from the pharmaceutical companies.
I want to read something to you that's really heart-wrenching.
This is from an RN. Actually, this is in the public domain.
She posted, I work as an RN reviewer for inpatient admissions.
I've seen a 24-year-old admitted with a heart attack.
I've seen an 18-year-old admitted for pulmonary embolus, which is a clot.
I've seen a 16-year-old admitted for a stroke.
And all the history and physicals say that, you know, either Moderna or Pfizer vaccine was given one to two days ago.
One said their vax was two hours prior.
Yeah, it's mind blowing.
This vaccine is being allowed.
And I can tell you that the company I review for is also reviewing and keeping track of everyone that's having a reaction.
Or admitted for it.
And the numbers are growing.
And the CEO and the medical directors are not happy.
Those are physicians, by the way.
Are not happy. But have no say, or from what I understand, no one to complain to.
The Department of Health isn't listening.
And then, another tragic story of a 27-year-old.
I want to read this to you because it's so significant.
This is a 27-year-old who received one of these two vaccinations.
And here's the adverse event description.
One of the ones that did get into the VAERS, apparently, and didn't get throttled off or hidden by the CDC. Quote, 27-year-old male with Down syndrome, no other past medical history, received second COVID-19 vaccine on April 27th.
On the 30th, just three days later, began feeling poorly with nausea, vomiting, possible chest discomfort, presented to the emergency department on April 30th.
That same day, EKG completed demonstrated diffuse ST elevation.
Patient was transferred to a medical center for heart catheterization.
This is a 27-year-old young man with no medical history, okay?
A patient subsequently transferred to a different medical center for higher level of care, was intubated, taken to a cath lab for heart biopsy, pulmonary artery catheter placement.
However, upon intubation, the patient decompensated and developed cardiac arrest.
They go on to say they put the person on therapeutic hypothermia.
That's chilling the body to minimize the heart burden.
Despite these efforts, the patient continued to have instability and was on high-dose vasopressors.
Patient subsequently suffered another cardiac arrest, briefly regained pulse with high-dose vasopressors, but subsequently lost pulse despite best efforts and died on May 1st at approximately 1 o'clock.
I don't know about you.
But I'm done. I'm done watching this happen to young people.
I'm done for a flu with a 100% recovery rate for which there are safe, generic, cheap, and efficacious medications.
And I am not going to stand by while they go after 12 to 17-year-olds and get their vials ready to start jabbing little toddlers and kindergartners.
I'm not going to put up with it.
I want to thank the crew and thank Owen Schroer for having me today.
Alex, thank you. I love you all.
It's been a pleasure and an honor.
alex jones
I'm Jane Ruby in The War Room.
And I'm not going to say his name or the media will attack him, obviously, but he's developed products for Whole Foods, he's developed products for HEB, he has developed a lot of best-selling products, and he himself actually owns a very successful I've got a deal with the French to be able to get these specially fed quail eggs.
The quail are fed, a special diet that's secret, and then in the quail eggs, in the quail shell particularly, is a compound that's secret.
You're allowed to do that because it's a food product.
It's totally natural, totally healthy.
That is an amazing natural antihistamine, basically, and works a lot better than some of the toxic stuff that's pushed in drugstores for the public.
And again, it's totally safe. It's a food product.
So I'm like, okay, yeah, great.
I'll buy 10,000 bottles of it.
And we sold those and suddenly people are like, we want more, we want more.
So now it's gone from being something that we barely even sold to be one of our hottest products because people have tried it.
But with the COVID breakdown and lockdown in society of the last year plus and supply chain problems, we haven't had it in.
Again, about six months.
We've got a limited shipment in.
People are so excited, but it's going to sell out quickly.
I want to encourage folks that haven't tried Pollen Block to get theirs today at m4warstore.com.
It's 40% off.
We have store and free shipping and double Patriot points for the Memorial Day special, so there's no excuse there.
Pollen Block back in stock.
DNA Force back in stock.
We also have Alva Power back in stock.
SuperMail Vitality back in stock.
Prostagard back in stock.
All back in stock and massively discounted.
40-50% off with store-free shipping.
Double Patriot points at InfoWarStore.com and at FundsTheInfoWar.
Export Selection