Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
Welcome to the war room. My name is Savannah Hernandez and I'm going to be sitting in for the next three hours with Tom Papert as we get through this | ||
crazy news day. | ||
We are also going to be joined by special guest Fog City Midge and Jacob Ingalls in the second and third hour today to discuss that Antifa video that actually went viral the other day of that Antifa woman just squishing Screaming wildly. | ||
We have Fox City Midge who was actually there to witness that in the second hour. | ||
Very excited to get her on. | ||
But of course, what we're going to be focusing on today is the coronavirus and last night's Iowa caucus. | ||
Many in the media are saying that this was a complete disaster, a meltdown, a collapse, a failure, and everyone has been talking about it. | ||
This is the first time that I actually watched an event like this. | ||
I was telling Tom Pappert just this morning and... | ||
It was shocking to see. | ||
Watching this unfold in real time was hilarious. | ||
And we have several clips that we're going to be going over and talking about today. | ||
But Tom, what are your thoughts on what happened last night? | ||
And what do you have for us today as well that you'd like to talk about? | ||
Well, you know, Savannah, since the invention of, I don't know, the telephone or even the telegraph, I think this may be the worst possible and the longest time we've had to wait. | ||
Worst possible scenario, longest time we've had to wait for results. | ||
They're now saying, I think it's going to be a total of 20 hours from the time the voting started. | ||
Usually you start getting results virtually in the first two hours. | ||
Well, it's going to be 20 hours this time, thanks to the Democrats' complete and utter failure. | ||
It's really astounding. | ||
And now, of course, we know they have this smartphone app. | ||
I mean, we're trusting our countries. | ||
This is the party that has convinced Russia hacked the election, but they're going to trust the security of our elections to a smartphone app and a bunch of volunteers who have been doing this for 30 or 40 years. | ||
It's not there's anything wrong with that. | ||
It's great that they're civilly engaged, but lots of people in their 60s and 70s, Savannah, I'm sure you realize not the best aficionados when it comes to smartphones. | ||
But then this app, I've read reports that whenever your phone would go dark, you know, you weren't using it for 15 to 30 seconds. | ||
So the screen shuts off. | ||
Well, that would completely reset the app and all the data would have to be put back into it. | ||
We now know that this app was created by an organization that was paid It was paid by Pete Buttigieg. | ||
It was paid by Joe Biden. | ||
It was paid by the Democrats in Iowa and in Nevada. | ||
Now, we don't know what the financial disclosure is. | ||
We don't know exactly what they were paid for, but this thing was also created by former Hillary Clinton employees. | ||
We know that Mitt Romney and Robbie Mook, who was one of the top guys in Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign, had a big part in making sure this caucus went right and was totally secure. | ||
So this is the biggest failure, I think, that the Democrats have had since 2016 when Hillary lost by a massive electoral margin because this is all of Hillary's people involved. | ||
This is all the establishment party people, this creepy company. | ||
And Savannah, this is the funniest part to me. | ||
The reason why we're having to wait 20 hours to find out, it seems, that Bernie Sanders won in a landslide. | ||
The reason why we have to wait 20 hours is because a company called Shadow was trusted with our election integrity. | ||
It's really just, it's hilarious. | ||
I almost feel bad for you. | ||
This is your first time watching one of these things. | ||
But at the same time, some of the clips we've got, some of the stuff we saw last night, I was laughing like I've never laughed before. | ||
Same, Tom. And again, so just hilarious that the company that created this app is called Shadow Inc. | ||
I was watching various media pundits and politicians comment on what went down last night. | ||
And Marianne Williamson, I think, gave a pretty good summary as well. | ||
She said, America, something went wrong here tonight and it wasn't just an app. | ||
If an app goes down, there's such things as telephones. | ||
Then a moderate candidate came out and made this weird victory speech. | ||
While mainstream media started talking about what a good night this was for Mike Bloomberg. | ||
And again, I think, you know, no one knew what was going on last night. | ||
It was a complete disaster. | ||
And I'm glad that you did bring up Pete Buttigieg as well because he has a big red target on his back because people are linking him back to that app. | ||
You know, he donated funds to the app. | ||
And there's just a lot of really interesting stuff that we're going to be getting into on the other side in regards to Buttigieg. | ||
And everything that happened last night. | ||
So stay tuned, folks. We have many great videos and guests coming up for you today, folks. | ||
And while you're waiting for us on this short break, go to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. Savannah Hernandez here in the chair, joined by Tom Pappert for the next three hours. | ||
Tom, I was looking through our video list because we do have so many clips of what went down last night at the Iowa caucus, of all the media pundits' reaction to... | ||
Everything that happened as that complete chaos ensued. | ||
But you brought up Pete Buttigieg and I do want to go ahead and get into that because of course he has been someone who has been really focused on in the media today because not only was he one of the first candidates last night to declare a complete victory even though the official results were not even released yet but it started to come out that he had funded the We're good to go. | ||
Well, Patrick Howley, of course, the man doesn't sleep. | ||
He eats and breathes and sleeps the news. | ||
He doesn't sleep. He just watches the news and surfs the news waves. | ||
So he actually wrote this late last night before going to bed when it was clear that we weren't going to get any results. | ||
I want to just hone in on something that is absolutely so hilarious that you brought up, Savannah. | ||
So you had, of course, Bernie Sanders came out and said, I think we're going to have a good night. | ||
You had Joe Biden come out and said, well, remember, I think we had a good night, but it's not just about tonight. | ||
It's about our message. | ||
And then you had Warren come out and say, I think we did well tonight. | ||
And then all of a sudden Pete Buttigieg comes out and he says, we won. | ||
I mean, he had absolutely no reason to say that. | ||
He has absolutely no idea whether or not he won or not, but he just went out and said, I won. | ||
And so by the way, the New York Times actually said that was a good move, that all the candidates should do that, because apparently the votes don't matter. | ||
Just come out, say you won and move on. | ||
So that's a little bit of fascinating tidbit right there. | ||
By the way, this is gonna hurt Bernie more than anyone else, us up. Nationalphile.com, Iowa. | ||
Biden and Pete paid Hillary Clinton veterans who made the failed app. | ||
Democrat presidential campaigns of Biden and Buttigieg paid the firm that reportedly built the failed Iowa caucus app. | ||
In the absence of results, Buttigieg, of course, declared victory. | ||
And the other candidates, including Biden, portrayed confidence. | ||
BuzzFeed confirmed this. | ||
Including with the presidential campaign that the firm Shadow built the app that frustrated the Democrat vote counters. | ||
Shadow Inc. accepted a $1,225 payment from Joe Biden for the purpose of text messaging and two payments totaling $42,500 from South Bend Mayor Pete Bootedge Edge's campaign for software rights and subscriptions, according to the FEC filing. | ||
Shadow firm is also paid by Kirstjen Gillibrand's failed presidential campaign and the state Democrat parties of Iowa, Texas, and Nevada. | ||
By the way, Nevada has since come out and confirmed that they're not going to be using this ridiculous app. | ||
They're going to go back to the old-fashioned method of call somebody up on the phone. | ||
I mean, I honestly think a telegram would be faster at this point. | ||
Shadow Inc. CEO Gerard Namara served as Senior Product Manager and then Director of Product for Hillary for America. | ||
That is, of course, Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign. | ||
His LinkedIn page states that he was promoted during the campaign to lead a small but mighty team in charge of all the campaign's tools for field organizers and volunteers. | ||
He runs Shadow Inc. | ||
with the fellow Clinton campaign tech alum, Krista Davis. | ||
Well, Robbie Mook and Mitt Romney, by the way, were also involved. | ||
They advised the Iowa Democrat and Republican parties on caucus security through the Defending Digital Democracy Project at Harvard University. | ||
Mook, however, has denied any type of relationship with the faulty app. | ||
So Savannah, I mean, you have, this is the Uniparty, this is the swamp, this is the globalist cabal that really runs this country, and they were 100% at the center of what happened last night. | ||
Whether it's Hillary Clinton's campaign, campaign company, this company that was started by the people who came from her campaign, being paid by Buttigieg, being paid by Biden, whether it's the fact that you have Mitt Romney, who of course was anti-Trump in 2016, And Robbie Mook, who is a Clinton—he's been with Clinton since day one, really, since the 90s, from my understanding. | ||
All these people come together to make sure Iowa goes off without a hitch, and it was anything but. | ||
Now, I really think that the big victim in all of this is Bernie Sanders. | ||
I mean, he is— Before we do get into Bernie, though, I would like to know and just say that I was watching this last night, like I was telling you, and it was so funny to me that, of course, this is all linking back to 2016 and Hillary Clinton. | ||
I was watching the Hill's coverage of the Iowa caucus and what they had to say, and of course, as soon as there started to be a glitch in the app and they started to say that they were going to be doing quality checks and Everyone in the mainstream media started saying, oh, well, we don't want right-wing conspiracies to start about election meddling. | ||
Let's not bring up 2016 and Hillary Clinton and how the election was stolen from Bernie back then. | ||
And we're seeing it happen in real time here now. | ||
Of course, people are really trying to stifle the whole election. | ||
I guess, theory what they're trying to say now that, you know, the DNC was responsible for this. | ||
But again, just going back into Buttigieg and his ties to Shadow Inc, ties to acronym as well, which we're realizing was an investor in Shadow Inc. | ||
I'm actually bringing them up right now because Greta Carnes is currently the national organizing director for Buttigieg. | ||
And she previously worked for Hillary Clinton back in 2016. | ||
And she was also the digital organizing director for Acronym, which was an investor of Shadow Inc. | ||
So we're seeing even further that within Pete Buttigieg's campaign, he has multiple people within his organization that have links to Shadow Inc. | ||
in one way or another. So this goes even further than just him funding or financing, you know, the company who created the app. | ||
Well, that is absolutely fascinating, and it should surprise me more. | ||
But the fact is, Hillary Clinton has her tendrils all over this race, all over the DNC. John Podesta, the guy, I believe his name was Skippy, in those bizarre emails that were leaked and put out by WikiLeaks. | ||
Skippy, he is on the Rules Committee of the DNC. The Deputy Chief of Staff of the State Department under Hillary, Jake Sullivan, who, of course, was another key figure in the email scandal, is the Vice Chair of the Platform Committee. | ||
Maria Cardona, who is a senior advisor in Clinton's 2008 campaign, is co-chair of the Rules Committee with former Massachusetts Congressman Barney Frank, another veteran Clinton defender. | ||
I mean, the names just go on and on and on. | ||
This entire election is being run by Hillary Clinton. | ||
She's got her favorite candidates, probably Biden and Buttigieg. | ||
She's got her people on the Rules Committee. | ||
They've already said that if it comes down to it, they will reverse all of their new rules and make it so they can use superdelegates to deny Bernie the nomination again. | ||
This is 110% a Clinton operation. | ||
The Clintons run the DNC, and now we know that the Clintons are essentially, it would seem, running their own candidates. | ||
They're picking their winners and losers. | ||
The big takeaway, of course, is that they do all of this. | ||
Mayor Pete comes out and declares victory. | ||
We're not going to have results for another hour at the very least. | ||
Hopefully we can get them live on the War Room. | ||
But Bernie Sanders, he's a commie. | ||
He's a dirtbag. Can't stand him. | ||
But he should have been allowed to have a speech last night. | ||
He should have been able to come out and say, the people of Iowa have voted for communism or socialism or whatever it is he calls it. | ||
And instead, because of this Clinton machine, because of the shadow ink that's run by Clinton people and people who are now in the Buttigieg camp, because of all of this insanity, Bernie has been denied a boost to his momentum. | ||
So I guess really, I mean, we should be congratulating the DNC. You pulled it off. | ||
You might have managed to stop Bernie Sanders in time for someone like Mike Bloomberg, who wasn't even on the ballot last night, to go and sweep a bunch of delegates away when it comes to Super Tuesday, which of course is coming up. | ||
Yes, Tom, great points there. | ||
And, you know, Sanders' campaign actually came out with their own internal caucus numbers last night. | ||
And, of course, too, my favorite thing about coming on the show is that we can take situations like this and kind of try to understand... | ||
I guess, where, like, what was trying to come of this situation. | ||
And, you know, Sanders, their campaign came out with the numbers that showed Biden in fourth place. | ||
So that made me think about, okay, maybe that's also why we saw this quality control, quality check. | ||
Because it came out that Joe Biden was not doing very well in this race, that he was going to be coming in fourth. | ||
And of course, we know that that isn't a good look. | ||
There's actually a clip about Jake Tapper when he realized this last night that I want to play for you on the other side. | ||
Savannah Hernandez and Tom Papert sitting in studio today talking to you about the disaster that was last night's Iowa caucus. | ||
We'll be right back after this short break. | ||
Stay tuned, folks, and go to Infowars store while you wait for us. | ||
Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
My name is Savannah Hernandez and I am co-hosting the next two and a half hours with Tom Papert. | ||
Owen Schroer is back in studio, but he has been hosting the Alex Jones Show because Alex has been out of studio this week. | ||
But Tom... Just to recap what happened last night, the disaster that was the Iowa caucus. | ||
Now, the Democratic Party came out with this tweet yesterday, I think yesterday, yeah, at 4 p.m., so well before the Iowa caucus was underway. | ||
And they said, for three years, we've been preparing for the process that officially kicks off tonight in Iowa, the Democratic presidential primary. | ||
Today, our chair, Tom Perez, reflects on the reforms we've made to make this the most transparent primary in our history. | ||
And of course, a lot of people had some funny responses to this because... | ||
This is something that they have been preparing for for three years and now it is being called just a complete system-wide disaster. | ||
They had to decide delegates by coin flips. | ||
Pete Buttigieg came out and declared victory even though there was no results. | ||
We still don't have results and it's like you said. | ||
Way, way past last night, and we should have those already. | ||
Now, I wanted to do a quick recap of Pete Buttigieg last night, why he had such a big red target on his back in terms of just his reaction to all of the votes yesterday. | ||
And a lot of people were saying, okay, let's take a look at Pete Buttigieg. | ||
He has ties to the people, or he funded the company today. | ||
Who designed this app. | ||
His director has ties to Acronym, which was Investor in Shadow. | ||
He declared his victory before the results came out. | ||
He won a coin toss, actually, for his delegate. | ||
And, I mean, even that video was a source of a lot of mockery because even the coin toss was ridiculous, Tom. | ||
So, just a recap of why Pete has been so focused on after last night. | ||
Not only that, but hashtag... | ||
I believe Cheating Pete was trending on Twitter last night. | ||
Sorry, Tom, there's so much information going on in my head in terms of what went on. | ||
But yeah, this was just a complete debacle. | ||
Well, it was truly mesmerizing to watch. | ||
I mean, I started out the night just making fun of the radical left, as I always do, and by the end of the night, and I ended the night way too late last night because I was under the impression maybe we'd finally get some results if I just stay up until 1 a.m., 2 a.m., okay, 2.30, and then eventually you just had to call it at some point. | ||
It was truly a disgrace. | ||
I mean, they even revised the rules last night over the last three years for the Iowa caucus to try to make it go smoother. | ||
And this is by far, I mean, this is something that you would see in the early 1900s before telephones were commonplace. | ||
This is It is so atypical to have this giant delay in reporting. | ||
And again, now we're looking at maybe 45 minutes. | ||
They'll get some of the results out. | ||
If they're able to, we don't know. | ||
And it just keeps on dragging out. | ||
And of course, I do think that like you've alluded to, the whole deal is meant to make Mayor Pete look like the big winner, of course, from the actual results. | ||
And it's hard to piece it together because you see a tweet from the secretary, the caucus secretary who they had maybe 400 people there in their gymnasium or the church or the mosque in one case where they were voting. | ||
And they will say, well, Bernie won and then it was Pete and then it was Elizabeth. | ||
And, you know, so you get all of these different tweets. | ||
It's impossible to compile that. | ||
But from what little evidence we have, it certainly seems like Bernie was the big winner. | ||
And of course, this, as we said, is all a big effort, in my opinion, to keep Bernie from getting any momentum as we go into the next several states. | ||
But you know, we should also talk about just the significance of Iowa. | ||
It's almost turned into the kiss of death for the Republican Party, where whatever Republican wins Iowa, they almost certainly do not get the nomination in these last few cycles. | ||
In 2008, I believe it was Mike Huckabee won Iowa. | ||
In 2012, it was, of course, Ron Paul who won Iowa. | ||
And then in 2016, it was Ted Cruz who won Iowa. | ||
Now going back to 2004 and 2000, then it was Jeb Bush, I mean, George Bush. | ||
So you can say, yes, it worked back then. | ||
But with the Democrats, it's completely different. | ||
From my knowledge, from my research, the last presidential nominee from the Democrat Party who did not win Iowa was Michael Dukakis in 1988. | ||
And that was, of course, because Gary Hart and Joe Biden was running back then, too. | ||
Joe Biden's been running for president since 1988. | ||
But Gary Hart was the Iowa winner. | ||
He went on to have a massive scandal related to an extramarital affair back when the media actually did its job and they followed him to a townhouse where he met a young woman. | ||
He denied it. | ||
He wound up getting out of the race. | ||
That led to Dukakis coming in. | ||
So that was the last time. | ||
And Dukakis, of course, lost in a massive, massive defeat. | ||
He only carried 10 states. | ||
So it is very unlikely. | ||
I mean, whether or not the Democrat Party insiders like it, it seems that whatever candidate comes out of this is probably going to be the nominee, unless, of course, Savannah, they were successful in destroying the forward momentum by making folks wait 20 hours to get a final tally or any tally or even 1% of the vote. | ||
So it's very crafty. | ||
I believe, I mean, this is all just opinion, right? | ||
But it certainly seems like this is an intentional effort to stymie Bernie Sanders because the DNC knows the impact that Iowa has on the race. | ||
Hillary Clinton certainly knows the impact that Iowa has on the race. | ||
And Tommy, you did make a really good point, too, in saying that, you know, they're stifling the votes up to this point. | ||
And when it comes out who really did win last night, it is going to have less of an impact. | ||
A lot of the times people give those speeches, the first speech that's given after they win, and that really propels them and picks up a lot of momentum for their campaign moving forward, moving into New Hampshire. | ||
So you did make a very good point with that. | ||
And like we said, too, potentially the DNC knew that Bernie Sanders was gaining a lot of popularity. | ||
And, you know, his internal caucus numbers showed that Biden was in fourth place at this point, which, again, is a pretty, pretty bad position to be in if you were a former vice president. | ||
And actually, I did want to play this clip for you, Tom. | ||
Let's go to Jake Tapper last night when he realized just how badly Joe Biden was doing. | ||
But it is interesting that in downtown Des Moines, right now, at this one precinct, Yang is representing better than an eight-year vice president. | ||
Than an eight-year vice president. | ||
Well, the media certainly picked their winner months ago. | ||
They thought it was going to be Joe Biden. | ||
They thought he'd run away with this. | ||
In Congress, we have the entire impeachment charade for the sole purpose of trying to play interference for Joe Biden. | ||
It doesn't look like anything works. | ||
You cannot help sleepy, creepy, gropey Joe. | ||
Right, Tom. And I mean, we've seen Joe Biden in the press the past couple of weeks, not even the past couple of weeks, but the past couple of months. | ||
People are not very receptive to him, kissing his granddaughter on the lips, groping children, snapping at reporters for asking normal questions, hard questions about Hunter Biden. | ||
He hasn't been handling himself very well, so it's no surprise that he did come in for or potentially came in fourth. | ||
We still don't know. | ||
But, again, I mean, this would have been a really great effort by the DNC to kind of hide the fact that Joe Biden is doing so poorly and, again, ultimately stifle Bernie Sanders, who we know has a lot of popularity. | ||
People have been on Twitter and they've been writing, Bernie Sanders is a communist, and they keep trying to push that out. | ||
And the closer and closer we get to the 2020 election, the more I'm realizing that There is potential for us to have a communist running for president of the United States in 2020. | ||
And I think a lot of people don't realize how popular Bernie Sanders is, just how much of America is standing behind him and how many people are accepting socialism every single day. | ||
So something that Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
I'm Tom Pappert, co-hosting today with the wonderful Savannah Hernandez. | ||
Savannah left off in the last segment talking about the actual threat that Bernie Sanders could pose to President Trump if he is the eventual Democrat nominee. | ||
Obviously, we've talked about how there are a lot of obstacles to that. | ||
Bernie Sanders, of course, has to deal with what happened last night, the potential that it will happen again. | ||
Maybe an app will secure the presidency or at least the nomination for Biden. | ||
But in addition to that, he has to get past the superdelegates, which, of course, the Democrats slightly modified their rules to make it less likely that they could nullify his candidacy with superdelegates. | ||
But now, as Bernie's numbers continue to improve... | ||
They're looking at getting rid of those new rules and making it so superdelegates can ensure whoever they want gets to be the nominee. | ||
Maybe it'll be Hillary Clinton again. | ||
We had a whole lot of fun with that last time. | ||
But regardless, Bernie Sanders does have a lot of popularity. | ||
And personally, Savannah, I would have loved to have seen a Bernie-Trump debate in 2016. | ||
I'm not so sure it would be as effective in 2020 now that we have AOC, now that he has been even more demonized. | ||
I think maybe some of the base may not be quite as hyped up on Trump. | ||
But, you know, Bernie Sanders, for his part, he is a very inconsistent person. | ||
People like to pretend that he's had the same policies for his entire career. | ||
But, you know, Bernie Sanders was actually a border hawk. | ||
He actually wanted to have strong borders in the United States as recently as 2015. | ||
We've got a video. | ||
I think we just need to play the first 30 or so seconds of it, but it's up at NationalFile.com. | ||
Let's go to that video. This is Flashback. | ||
Five years ago, Bernie Sanders opposed open borders, called it a Koch brothers proposal. | ||
unidentified
|
What you said about being a democratic socialist is a more international view. | |
But I think if you take global poverty that seriously, it leads you to conclusions that in the US are considered out of political bounds. | ||
Things like sharply raising the level of immigration we permit, even up to a level of open borders, about sharply increasing the immigration for NATO. | ||
That's a Koch brothers proposal. | ||
Really? Of course. | ||
I mean, that's a right-wing proposal which says essentially there is no United States. | ||
But it would make a lot of global poor richer, wouldn't it? | ||
And it would make everybody in America poorer. | ||
Then you're doing away with the concept of a nation state. | ||
I mean, Savannah, the man was totally right. | ||
In 2015, he sounds like President Donald Trump. | ||
And it is, by the way, a Koch brothers policy. | ||
The Koch brothers love cheap labor. | ||
That's how they manage to stay in business, with cheap foreign labor. | ||
Whether it's illegal immigrants, whether it's just mass immigration, H-1B visas, that's how the Koch brothers make their money. | ||
But in 2020... | ||
Bernie Sanders says that if he is elected president, he will immediately reinstate DACA. | ||
He will expand DACA. | ||
He will use executive authority to allow undocumented immigrants who have resided in the United States to remain free from the threat of deportation. | ||
He will reunite families that have been ripped apart by deportation policies. | ||
He's going to do everything he can for refugees, for illegals, for these so-called DACA recipients, the dreamers, as President Obama liked to refer to them as. | ||
So Bernie Sanders has turned on his heel over the last five years. | ||
And I believe that if voters saw this Bernie Sanders agreeing with President Trump, essentially, who is no friend of the Kochs, I don't know what would happen. | ||
I think that they would have a bit of a conniption fit. | ||
And Tom, I'm glad that you did bring this up because you're completely right. | ||
A lot of people always say when defending Bernie that his message has been the same through the years. | ||
They always go back to whenever he was a young politician and they like to say, you know, Bernie was saying the same things then that he is saying now. | ||
So I always do enjoy these videos that are brought back up to light that really expose, you know, the reality of what these people think, how their mindsets change over the years. | ||
And, you know... | ||
Especially with the Super Bowl, too, we saw a very pro-open borders, pro-immigration message from Jennifer Lopez and Shakira there. | ||
And, you know, this has been a really popular subject. | ||
And I think that, of course, too, is why Bernie Sanders is now jumping back on board with it and trying to push for the specific thing. | ||
Well, I think you're right, and I think it's a signal of weakness or perhaps just grifterness that he's going to change his fundamental beliefs to suit the issues of the day. | ||
I mean, last night, Savannah, I watched just a couple minutes of his speech before I buckled over laughing and I had to turn it off. | ||
Because he said something along the lines of, we're going to stop making these weapons of war that are designed to make people kill each other. | ||
And instead, we will unite to fight our true enemy. | ||
And that is climate change. | ||
And I couldn't take, I burst out laughing. | ||
I couldn't, I probably woke the neighbors up. | ||
He didn't mention, to my knowledge, climate change hardly at all in 2016. | ||
It was like not even a part of his shtick. | ||
But in 2020, because we have AOC, we have all these green lunatics running around saying that you're going to be able to take a train to Hawaii in the near future, because of all of this, now Bernie Sanders wants open borders and he wants climate change to be fought with the same tenacity that we fought World War II with. | ||
Right, Tom. And I'm just so happy that you brought this to light, too. | ||
And especially with the rising popularity of Bernie Sanders, especially after last night, I really do think that that is one of the big reasons why these results are being so suppressed, because Bernie's number one. | ||
He's been number one. If you've been paying attention to The polls at all, the media, people's interaction with Bernie, his rallies, he's able to draw bigger crowd sizes than, I would say, Joe Biden, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar. | ||
People know who Bernie Sanders is. | ||
He's been popular since back in 2016. | ||
So, of course, that's no different now in 2020. | ||
And, you know, a lot of people after last night, too, are getting on board with Bernie because they are upset that he wasn't granted basically a fair election, the fair vote that he was promised yesterday. | ||
Well, I think that that is what this comes down to. | ||
And perhaps the Democrat wisdom is right. | ||
I mean, major Democrats, we've heard that even President Obama is reportedly very, very concerned about the prospects of a Bernie Sanders candidacy when it comes to going up against President Donald Trump. | ||
Personally, I think Trump is going to wipe the floor with this guy. | ||
I mean, what's he going to do? Wave his hair at him? | ||
I mean, do some of these gesticulations that Bernie likes to do? | ||
He's got no chance. And so the fact is, you know, my heart does go out to Bernie supporters. | ||
I can't much stand Bernie, but the Bernie supporters who aren't threatening to put you and me in a gulag, Savannah, they seem to be populist. | ||
They seem to be anti-establishment. | ||
And it's unfortunate that the only Democrat who comes close to being an anti-establishment Thank you. | ||
Thank you. | ||
For his campaign. So it's unfortunate that their one hope, you know, in 2016 we had Donald Trump and it seemed like it was us against the world. | ||
Well, we won. I don't see the same thing happening for Bernie Sanders, especially not with the DNC stabbing him in the back at every opportunity. | ||
And Tom, I'm glad that you brought up the Project Veritas reports because, of course, we know that 2020 has already been a whirlwind of news reports, of stories, and that kind of got swept under the rug. | ||
I forgot about that myself. | ||
The fact that Project Veritas came out with those videos, several videos of people within Bernie's campaign talking about putting, you know, billionaires in gulags, pushing socialism, putting Trump supporters in re-education camps. | ||
And of course, too, after last night, a lot of people are looking to Bernie Sanders and his supporters as victims. | ||
They feel really bad that this is something that's happening to Bernie again. | ||
But I am glad that you did bring up that point because very, very important to note that, you know, these are still the people that are backing Bernie and some of the ideals that they are hoping to implement into America. | ||
Well, and it's just greatly ironic because, of course, Bernie doesn't support what these people want. | ||
Bernie wants to make a lot of money. | ||
He wants to probably, not gonna say it's what's happening, but he's going to funnel a lot of this money or just pay them, maybe it's all legal and above board, to his wife's friend's ad agency that his wife used to be on the board of or used to own a part of. | ||
He wants to sell a bunch of books. | ||
He says, this is the guy who doesn't like capitalism, who went to the Soviet Union for his wedding honeymoon. | ||
He is the guy who said that they had beautiful chandeliers and beautiful opportunities for young people in the Soviet Union. | ||
This is the same guy who said that it's okay that he's now a millionaire because he wrote a book, he produced a good, and a lot of people bought it. | ||
So it's absolutely comical that this guy stands a chance. | ||
And I think it's really a horrible indictment of the Democrats that not only does this guy stand a chance, but he's probably their best, the betting man's choice to be the nominee So it's really pathetic. You're watching The War Room, of course. | ||
Make sure to check out InfoWareStore.com in the break. | ||
We'll be right back. I'm Tom Papert, Editor-in-Chief, NationalFile.com, here with Savannah Hernandez. | ||
We'll be right back. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. My name is Savannah Hernandez and I am co-hosting with Tom Papert today. | ||
We've been talking a lot about last night's disastrous Iowa caucus and of course that was in result to a delay in being able to get the final results on what happened last night. | ||
We still don't have the results now. | ||
Some reports are saying that Hopefully we'll have them by 5 p.m. | ||
Eastern Time, so we'll keep you posted on that. | ||
But last night, an Iowa precinct secretary was actually live on CNN trying to get his results through to a hotline. | ||
And let's just go ahead and let you guys watch how that went. | ||
unidentified
|
They tried to, I think, promote an app. | |
To report the results, the app by all accounts just like doesn't work. | ||
So we've been recommended to call into the hotline and the hotline has not been responsive. | ||
Have you gotten any explanation, Sean? | ||
Sean, have you gotten any explanation at all as to what's going on? | ||
No, I have not. | ||
No. I'm just waiting on hold and doing my best to report the results from my precincts. | ||
What are you hearing? I know you're listening to a conversation from the Iowa Democratic Party. | ||
Um, this is a real coincidence wolf. | ||
I just got off hold just now. | ||
So I've got to get off the phone to report the results. | ||
Alright, go ahead and report your results. | ||
Can we listen in as you report them, Sean? | ||
Yep. Alright, let's listen. | ||
Okay, hi. Hello? | ||
They hung up on me. | ||
They hung up on me. | ||
Okay, I've got to get back. | ||
So that was an Iowa precinct secretary being hung up live on air, hung up on live on air, trying to deliver the results of last night's Iowa caucus. | ||
That was a clip that went viral and had everyone laughing. | ||
I heard the guys in the back laughing about that. | ||
And I think that was pretty much a great example of what happened throughout the whole night last night. | ||
It was a complete, it was in shambles. | ||
I think so. I think it's fair to say CNN played at least a small role in derailing these results even further. | ||
That was possibly the funniest news segment in the history of broadcast television or cable news. | ||
Definitely. Absolutely hilarious. | ||
Savannah, one thing that's kind of getting, it's almost getting swept under the rug because of the Democrats' inability to have a caucus, apparently. | ||
You know, President Trump had a very strong showing. | ||
He won something like 96.5% of the vote. | ||
The GOP challengers, of course, you have Joe Walsh, not the good one, the boring one. | ||
You have Joe Walsh and you have Bill Weld, the former libertarian vice presidential candidate in 2016. | ||
They're both running. | ||
Not many people even know this. | ||
They're both running against President Trump as Republicans. | ||
They both got combined less than a thousand votes. | ||
And from it's being widely reported that President Trump actually broke Obama's previous record for the most votes given to an incumbent during a caucus in Iowa. | ||
So massive victory for Trump, massive victory for Republicans and possibly the largest PR disaster for the Democrats in recent memory. | ||
Definitely Tom. | ||
And I'm glad that you brought Trump up as well because a new Gallup poll just came out today saying that Trump's job approval is at his personal best. | ||
It is at 49% approval among Republicans. | ||
So President Trump doing very well and several other media pundits saying that if any other person had this approval rate at this point in their presidency, a re-election would be pretty much guaranteed. | ||
But going back to what happened last night as well, Tom, of course, CNN didn't want to just blame the Democrats for, you know, the whole entire debacle that was last night. | ||
Here's what they said. | ||
Was wrong with Iowa being allowed to cast the first votes in clip 28. | ||
unidentified
|
If there's some technical problems that they're not disclosing, we could be, you know, very late on this. | |
I mean, I just think that the idea of the caucus has failed to meet the viability threshold, okay? | ||
The idea of the caucus itself has failed to meet the viability threshold because we've all been saying the whole time, why Iowa in the first place? | ||
It's 90% white. You know, when you have a party as diverse as this to be in a state that's not diverse, it's terrible. | ||
unidentified
|
People ain't be able to vote and go home. | |
I don't like caucuses in the first place. | ||
But then if you can't even deliver on your one job, Nia Malika said it exactly right. | ||
You only have one job, Iowa. | ||
They got one job. Governor, you've talked about this before. | ||
You and I have talked about this. How would you like to see, I mean, what state would you like to have come first? | ||
Virginia. First of all, Virginia, of course. | ||
But I think we should start regionally. | ||
I mean, you should do three or four or five states. | ||
You shouldn't have one. | ||
So, Tom, there is CNN's professional analysis of last night as well. | ||
Of course, Iowa is too white to be making these decisions. | ||
What are your thoughts as a white male? | ||
How does that make you feel? Well, of course, more race mongering from CNN doesn't really surprise me. | ||
This is the leftist network where they're supposedly against all forms of racism. | ||
And yet here you are saying, oh, well, you can't have them go first. | ||
They're too white. But it's bigger than that, Savannah. | ||
It's very disparaging to the people of Iowa who, by all accounts... | ||
They did their damn best to deal with an app that was created by Hillary Clinton people and funded in part by Pete Buttigieg. | ||
I mean, they did everything they could if we had just done it like any other year. | ||
Again, I'm guessing that it's been pretty much the same since the invention of the telephone, maybe since the invention of the telegram. | ||
If we had just done it how it had been done every single other time in this nation's modern history, we would have the results by now. | ||
We would have had the results by 10 o'clock. | ||
We all would have gotten to bed at a decent time. | ||
And we would know whatever the results were, whether it's, oh, wow, Biden did an upset, or whether it's, oh, Pete Buttigieg really did win, or as I personally think is going to be the case, Bernie Sanders walked away the winner. | ||
But the people did nothing wrong. | ||
They did their best. | ||
Some of these volunteers have probably been doing this every cycle since they were 30 years old. | ||
You get 70-year-old ladies who do this job because they love being a civil servant. | ||
They love working in the political process. | ||
They want to help. | ||
So it's disparaging to the good people of Iowa who were held hostage by an app, by a digital CRM, essentially, created with big, big help from Hillary Clinton personnel. | ||
It's pathetic of CNN to blame this on the people of Iowa. | ||
The race part doesn't surprise me, but the fact that CNN is yet again disparaging middle America, that's the real takeaway for me, Savannah. | ||
And again, it's so ironic that the Democratic Party came out yesterday and said that this is supposed to be the most transparent primary in our history. | ||
And it ended up being the complete opposite of that, Tom. | ||
You had said that you thought that Bernie Sanders was going to be the most popular candidate. | ||
You think that he was going to be the one that really outshined everyone else after last night's vote. | ||
And I agree with that. | ||
I think that Bernie would have been the top candidate, especially after seeing clips like this. | ||
Let's go to clip 31. | ||
unidentified
|
You look at these... | |
One more look at... | ||
Oh, they're gone. The Joe Biden folks are gone. | ||
There's two left. There was like five and they were hanging tough and now they're gone. | ||
And then the undisputed winner, at least again in this field house only, the Bernie folks who've been the most vocal sort of the entire... | ||
Okay, Tom. So, yeah, that was my favorite clip that came out of last night. | ||
This poor MSNBC anchor turns around and he tries to go, oh, let's look at Joe Biden's peak. | ||
They're gone. There's only two. | ||
They're gone. Okay. So, I mean, in classic Joe Biden fashion, he attracts the smallest crowds. | ||
I'm sure they were the last ones in and they were the first ones out. | ||
Well, you know, if you look at it, Joe Biden has had an incredibly difficult campaign. | ||
The man can't speak properly. | ||
unidentified
|
That's how this all started. Remember, his rambling speeches. | |
Right. I mean, it sounds that way. | ||
It started out with these rambling speeches. | ||
Then it was the two or three women who came out and said, yeah, Joe Biden sniffed my hair and it made me feel uncomfortable. | ||
Then it was the poor little black girl who he sniffed that kid two days after saying before the world that he wasn't going to sniff anybody else. | ||
So it started with the touching and the sniffing and the not being able to talk. | ||
Then you keep going on. | ||
It's Hunter Biden, who is, I'm pretty sure, a crackhead hanging out in New York strip clubs. | ||
I think that's a known fact. Yeah, he is a crackhead, Tom. | ||
He's allegedly having sex toys used on him in New York strip clubs, as reported by the New York Post, reputable mainstream publication. | ||
Then all of a sudden we find out what's going on with this Burisma thing. | ||
He has had the worst campaign potentially in modern history. | ||
History blows everyone away. | ||
I mean, people thought it was bad in 1988 when Biden ran for president and he had to quit after accusations of lying about his college education and plagiarism came out. | ||
Now, this dwarfs that. | ||
So the fact that the media, and I'm guilty of it too, the fact that the media has built Biden up this big is really something because if you look at it on paper, the man has nothing going for him, except that he was a black guy's vice president. | ||
Right. And you said that he was running back in 1988. | ||
And I mean, even now, Tom, I'm sure if you go to a Biden rally and you go ask one of his 10 supporters what he's done while he's been in office, what political impact has he had on America, I'm sure no one would have an answer. | ||
I sure don't. I have no idea. | ||
And other than Joe Biden not being able to speak clearly and just being overall creepy, barking at reporters and being a grumpy old man, I mean, I really think that's the only thing that he's contributed to... | ||
I guess this whole entire campaign cycle so far, that's the only impact that he's made is being the grumpy, creepy old grandpa running. | ||
Folks, make sure you go to Infowarsstore.com while you wait for us on the other side of this break. | ||
We're going to be joined by Fog City Midge, who was in San Francisco and got confronted by Antifa. | ||
We'll have her on the other side, me and Tom Pappert in studio. | ||
Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
Savannah Hernandez and Tom Papert co-hosting the next two hours. | ||
We are going to be joined by Fog City Midge after this first five minutes. | ||
She was in San Francisco the other weekend and she was confronted by Antifa. | ||
We are going to have that clip for you coming up. | ||
And I'm sure many of you saw it. | ||
It went very viral. So I'm excited to get her take on it and her explanation of what went down there and what happened. | ||
But of course before we get midge on I do want to direct our Listeners and viewers to go to the InfoWars store because we do have some great sales going on now Of course because of the Iowa caucus yesterday We did take a little bit of a break from the coronavirus news But that is still something that is breaking around the world the World Health Organization last week declared that a global health emergency And luckily for you guys Alex is always prepared for anything and he has storable foods on | ||
Sale at the store right now, so I would highly recommend going and grabbing some He was telling us that it is going to be sold out soon because there's such a high demand for it So there's one month supply three month supplies One year supply even if you want to be extra prepared people have said that this food tastes delicious There's great five-star reviews, so I'd highly recommend you heading to the store and grabbing that Also in that whole first hour | ||
there was so much information to get to and I was getting so Tongue-tied and bridges brain freeze because I was just like was information overload over here And I really think it was because I totally forgot to take my brain force before I got on air today So it's been really hard for me to have as much clarity and focus as I normally do. | ||
This is one of my favorite products, folks, Brain Force Plus. | ||
It is currently 25% off at the store. | ||
Go and read the reviews for yourself if you don't believe me. | ||
Amazing reviews, 92%. | ||
All across the board. | ||
Awesome product. I love it. | ||
I wish I would have taken some today. | ||
Maybe I'll have the crew bring me some or some Turbo Force to just help pep me back up because that was a lot of information to get through, folks. | ||
But great products on the InfoWars store right now. | ||
Tom, do you have any specific products that you'd like to plug? | ||
What is your favorite? Well, honestly, I think my favorite is a tie between TurboForce and BrainForce. | ||
Of course, I've been taking BrainForce for years. | ||
TurboForce is sometimes—it's the same great feeling, same great clarity, but it lasts even longer. | ||
But Savannah, I wanted to back up something you said about the coronavirus. | ||
This is absolutely still something that we should all— Be worried about. | ||
A medical journal recently revealed that coronavirus may still be contagious even after somebody recovers. | ||
So you get sick, you're down for two or three days, maybe you go to the hospital, you get a clean bill of health, you leave the hospital, you can still be getting other people sick. | ||
That complicates the idea of a quarantine even more so than it already was. | ||
Because you start out, you're asymptomatic for seven or eight days. | ||
Then you finally show symptoms. | ||
Well, for those past week and a day, you've still been able to spread the virus. | ||
So you can not only, then now you get sick, maybe you get better. | ||
You have a good immune system. | ||
You bounce back. Well, you might still be able to spread this. | ||
So for somebody who isn't sick, that means anybody, somebody who is sick, somebody who is healthy, somebody... | ||
This was a German man that this happened to, by the way, not somebody from Wuhan, China. | ||
This is something that we really need to be worried about as we continue going into this new year. | ||
They do not have this thing contained. | ||
They're saying that it might be impossible to contain. | ||
And by the way, this is mainline journalism. | ||
We covered it at nationalfile.com, but we found the original medical documents in the New England Journal of Medicine. | ||
So this is all the more reason if it comes down to it, you want to be able to lock yourself and your family away, be somewhere safe and clean. | ||
Get an air filter at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Get storable food at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Get a water filter at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
Get products that boost your immune system. | ||
Winter Sun is a fantastic boost to the immune system. | ||
Immune Gargle is honestly, that may actually be my favorite product, Savannah, because I use it anytime I travel. | ||
You know, when I go down to Texas... | ||
I use it before I get on the plane, after I get off the plane, and that keeps me from getting sick. | ||
Well, now I'm doing it just walking around the streets of Wichita just to be on the safe side. | ||
So all the products at Infowarsstore.com can help you live a normal, happy, healthy life, but when you're looking at a potential worldwide pandemic as we are right now, when you're staring down the barrel of it, it's more important than ever to be prepared. | ||
Definitely, Tom. I'm glad that we were able to lay all of those great products out for our listeners and viewers because I swear I can literally go to the store and just keep scrolling and scrolling and scrolling. | ||
We have a product for everyone and everything under the sun. | ||
So go to Infowarsstore.com and take a peek at some of the great stuff. | ||
Fog City Mage up next. Welcome back. | ||
Welcome back. My name is Savannah Hernandez and I am co-hosting today with Tom Papert. | ||
We are joined by Fog City Midge in this segment. | ||
Now, she was in San Francisco holding an LGBTQ town hall. | ||
And walk away event with Brandon Straka. | ||
This has been a great event that has garnered a lot of attention all over America. | ||
Brandon Straka has encouraged people to walk away from the Democratic Party. | ||
And Scott Pressler was also there in San Francisco as well doing a trash pickup. | ||
And Antifa went to go protest them. | ||
So here's an exclusive clip from Fog City Midge detailing a little bit of those events. | ||
unidentified
|
Why are these people being so hateful? | |
Why don't they want to see us picking up trash? | ||
That's my question. | ||
And in fact, these people assaulted a gay man today in our trash cleanup. | ||
That is a hate crime. | ||
So what is different than Hitler and the Nazis and these people who are assaulting gay people picking up trash on the streets of San Francisco? | ||
No cops! Why do you hate the black community so much that blacks come last and illegals come first? | ||
That's what I want to know, white woman. | ||
White woman, why do you put blacks last when illegals come first? | ||
You can't answer me, white woman. | ||
Racist. Racista. | ||
Racista. You are trying to tear apart America, but you will not succeed. | ||
We have a man in the White House who's going to fight back against all of your lies, all of your decisions, and all of your hatred. | ||
And we're fighting back too. | ||
LGBT people are smarter than this, and they deserve better than this. | ||
They see where you are and they're going to walk away. | ||
We are walking away from the divisive left. | ||
Walk away! Walk away! Walk away! Walk away! Walk away! | ||
So we're out here today in San Francisco. | ||
The walkaway event hosted by Brandon Straka and Scott Pressler. | ||
Blair White's here. | ||
Ricky Rebels here. It got shut down at the last minute because this women's building decided to not allow a conservative group to host their event. | ||
Why are you shutting down this art event? | ||
Why would you just let us speak? | ||
What do you saw for you guys? | ||
unidentified
|
Screaming! | |
Screaming! | ||
Hey! Hey! | ||
Donald Trump has got to go! | ||
Hey! Hey! Go home! | ||
Donald Trump has got to go! | ||
So for our radio listeners, I believe this is a little bit of what the event looked like before, of course, that viral clip started to spread of this woman right here who went crazy and started screaming at you and screaming at your event. | ||
And there's the beginning of that clip right there. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm so sorry to our radio listeners that they have to listen to this right now. | |
Just that scream. Get back up! | ||
All right, Midge. | ||
First off, respect to you for standing there and just having the mental calm to be able to just stand there and film that. | ||
Talk to us about what happened... | ||
Why you guys were not allowed to be within your venue because you were supposed to be hosting that event inside, correct? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, so this is basically the fourth out of fifth of these LGBT walk-away town halls that have been canceled. | |
And what happens is that they announce the venue at the last minute so that they can have their event and basically not have protesters show up and not be shut down. | ||
But of course, As soon as they announced the venue, people get on the phone and the cancel culture gets the event shut down. | ||
And that's what they did this evening. | ||
And they didn't have a legitimate excuse for this. | ||
They knew exactly who Brandon Strzok was, what the walk away event was all about. | ||
But what they claimed was that the cleanup earlier in the day That some of the group members had participated in was disparaging to the homeless in San Francisco. | ||
And that was why the event was shut down, which is a completely bogus excuse because, you know, I was a part of the cleanup earlier that day. | ||
We were incredibly respectful of the homeless. | ||
And if anything, they were very grateful to have us there, to have us helping them to be cleaning up the area because everyone deserves a clean space to live in. | ||
Definitely, Midge. And of course, we saw all those videos of Scott Pressler as well. | ||
He was out there. As with always, with every single event, it was very successful. | ||
You guys picked up a lot of trash and you were able to clean up a lot of the community over there and the sidewalks and the streets. | ||
I saw that there was many needles on the streets that you guys picked up as well. | ||
So very sad to see that this was Antifa's response during the cleanup as well that was earlier in the day and prior to this video. | ||
Were you getting some response like that from Antifa as well? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, so while we were at the cleanup, Antifa actually showed up, started following people around, harassing them, taking photographs of them. | |
And they actually came over to sort of the group hub where people would meet, check in, get bags, you know, drop off their trash, like come and go from that sort of meeting point. | ||
And Antifa came there and they protested. | ||
They had such a problem with people coming to San Francisco And picking up trash that they had to protest. | ||
We invited them to come join us, but they wanted nothing to do with us. | ||
And what's so funny is many of the people that were protesting in the afternoon at the cleanup were the same people that came out this evening. | ||
And you can actually see many of them in the video. | ||
And it's just hilarious to me because the things that they're shouting there, the things that they were protesting about, one of the chants that they repeated many times was, you know, trans rights matter, you know, black lives matter. | ||
And it's so funny because this was an LGBT event. | ||
There were people who were supposed to be speaking that evening who are trans, who are gay, who were drag queens, And our whole side was very diverse and very inclusive. | ||
And meanwhile, these people on the Antifa side, on the radical left, are sitting there shouting us down, not allowing us to have our event and not allowing these voices to be heard in San Francisco. | ||
I was even told that we were not welcome in San Francisco. | ||
San Francisco doesn't want us to get out of their neighborhood. | ||
And this is my neighborhood, too. | ||
So I find it just incredibly intolerant. | ||
And I'm always amazed by just how radical the left has become. | ||
Definitely, Midge. And again, props to you for being able to stand there and to stand up against Antifa as well. | ||
Watching that video, it doesn't seem like there was any constructive conversation from Antifa with you guys. | ||
What happened after that viral clip? | ||
I mean, were you guys able to get out of there safely? | ||
Were you guys able to have any conversations with Antifa? | ||
unidentified
|
What ended up happening after? I was trying to have conversation with them for several hours. | |
I mean, basically, because the event was shut down, they decided to do sort of impromptu speeches on the sidewalk to not let themselves be silenced. | ||
And that's why Brandon Strzok and Scott Pressler kind of gave impromptu rally speeches to our group who did come out there. | ||
But yeah, Antifa basically was shouting over us, playing music, yelling, screaming, not even allowing us to really even be able to hear the speakers. | ||
And they, as you can see in the video that you just posted, they're pushing, they're shouting, they're shoving people, they're bullying, you know, many of the LGBT people who came there tonight to have their marginalized voices heard. | ||
And yeah, so this woman came kind of towards the end, which was so funny because it was almost like she walked up and just had such this like It was a wild reaction. | ||
It was almost like she was possessed. | ||
It reminded me a lot of the MAGA hat meltdown. | ||
I don't know if you remember the woman who was screaming at me for wearing a MAGA hat when I attended the Women's March last year. | ||
A very similar looking woman who had a similar reaction with just Just screaming. | ||
And as you can see at the end of the video clip of mine, she actually licked my phone. | ||
And my cameraman had his hand licked. | ||
My phone was licked. | ||
No. It was disgusting. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, gosh. And it's funny because I remember that actually happened to Owen one day when a radical protester licked his camera. | |
And I just think it's so crazy that this is how these people think it's appropriate to react. | ||
That this is productive for them. | ||
It's crazy. Yeah, I definitely don't understand it. | ||
And seeing your video did remind me of Owen because that happened to him too. | ||
He had his mic sponge or his pop filter bitten off of his microphone. | ||
I mean, he's been licked. | ||
He's been spit on. | ||
One of the first times I went out to do a report at one of these protests, I got spit on. | ||
It's ridiculous that, you know, the left thinks that they can treat people this way, especially at an event that is so So inclusive of everyone, the exact same thing that they say that, you know, we are not. | ||
But anyway, Mitch, I want to get your take on what happened last night and a little bit more about your experiences at rallies. | ||
We'll be right back on the other side of this short break. | ||
Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
My name is Savannah Hernandez and I am co-hosting today with Tom Papert. | ||
In this segment, we are joined by Fog City Midge, who was detailing the Antifa confrontation that she had to deal with in San Francisco as she attended a walkaway event. | ||
Of course, that clip went viral of that crazy demon-possessed Antifa member as she screamed and screamed and screamed at the attendees of the walkaway event. | ||
For what reason? | ||
People still aren't sure. | ||
But that's Fog City Midge. | ||
Again, you can follow her on Twitter at Fog City Midge and Instagram Fog City Midge as well. | ||
But Midge, you and I were talking in the break about the Women's March. | ||
You said that at the event in San Francisco, the woman that was screaming at you reminded you of when you were wearing your MAGA hat at the Women's March last year and you got the same reaction. | ||
Which city did you attend the Women's March in this year and did you get a similar reaction or what was the coverage like this year? | ||
unidentified
|
This year was completely different. | |
It's funny because this year I attended the Women's March in San Francisco and it's just so funny to me because they have lost so much enthusiasm. | ||
The Women's March this year was by far much, much smaller than in previous years. | ||
The people that were in attendance had lost a lot of enthusiasm. | ||
I guess three years of protesting and so much winning has exhausted these people. | ||
But it was nothing like this confrontation that I had last year with David Harris when we were at the Women's March Los Angeles. | ||
And, you know, the radical feminists were screaming at us and calling us every name that you can expect. | ||
But, yeah, it was really interesting to see just how much People are not interested in the Women's March anymore. | ||
And it was funny because that was in sort of mid-January. | ||
And then the next week, they had the Walk for Life in San Francisco, which is sort of part of the March for Life. | ||
And it was 10 times larger, which is funny because you never see this on the media. | ||
The Women's March was so poorly attended, yet the March for Life was so well attended. | ||
But yeah, I did wear my MAGA hat to the Women's March this year. | ||
And yeah, it wasn't, people were angry with me, but it wasn't nearly to the level. | ||
Because I think that people, when you present them with the facts, or you just sort of ask them, why are you so angry? | ||
You realize that these people don't really have any facts. | ||
They're just angry people. | ||
They don't even know why they're angry. | ||
Right, and going back to the Women's March numbers, I attended the Women's March in Washington, D.C. this year, and then I also attended the March for Life in D.C., and I was astounded by the number of people who were at the March for Life versus the Women's March. | ||
I had no idea. At the March for Life, I was waiting to be able to see the end of the march. | ||
And it was just huge, just flowing people. | ||
It seemed like millions to me in the street. | ||
I've never seen so many people in my life. | ||
Whereas with the Women's March, I could see the beginning and the end of the march from where I was standing. | ||
So I think you're completely right in that. | ||
A lot of people are losing steam with their hatred for President Trump. | ||
And I think it's kind of something that's becoming really old news. | ||
Tom, you've been kind of silent lately. | ||
But what do you think about that? | ||
What do you think about, I guess, the dying movements of the Women's March, of these hate-filled events targeted at hating Donald Trump? | ||
Well, it is just interesting. | ||
And that was, of course, you mentioned that Infowars reported the same thing, that police officers said it was 10 times smaller than it had been in recent years. | ||
And you would think in a city like San Francisco, you know, maybe I can understand folks can't travel all the way to Washington, D.C., but you would certainly think that it would be A lot bigger there in the epicenter. | ||
You would have thought that that lovely woman who shouted in the camera and licked it, apparently, you would think that she might have been there. | ||
So, Midge, what would you attribute that to? | ||
Do you think that people are just getting tired of the hate? | ||
Do you think that they're caught up with the election? | ||
Why was it so much smaller this year? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I think they're realizing that... | |
I mean, well, what's funny is I try to go to as many protests as I can, and I get all the emails from all the leftist groups And they're out there protesting nearly every single week. | ||
And I think that at a point you have to wake up and realize that so much of this is being pushed by the media. | ||
There's a new outrage every single week that they need to be protesting Trump over, that something new has happened. | ||
And I think some of them have just lost enthusiasm and lost the energy to go out and protest every weekend. | ||
And I also think that some people are waking up and saying, maybe this is bogus. | ||
Why do people hate this president so much? | ||
The country is doing great. | ||
And it was funny because actually when I was at the March for Life, so many people did support the president. | ||
People that didn't even support him in 2016 that are now so supportive of this president and believe that he actually is the real deal. | ||
He is keeping his promises. | ||
So I spoke to many people that were Democrats that have walked away from the Democrat Party. | ||
And so maybe that also has something to do with the dwindling enthusiasm of these leftist marches. | ||
Speaking of the Democratic Party too, Midge, what did you think of the Iowa caucus last night and everything that happened with that whole situation? | ||
unidentified
|
It's hilarious. | |
I mean, I'm still waiting. | ||
I still want to know what really happened. | ||
I don't think we'll ever know what the truth is, but it definitely seems incredibly shady. | ||
It's hard to believe that they can get away with the same thing that they did before. | ||
And it's hilarious to me also that these people claim that they want to be in charge of our entire government, in charge of our health care, in charge of our economy, and they cannot even run the Iowa caucuses. | ||
It's pretty hilarious. | ||
That is one of my favorite points that people have made so far. | ||
It's just like, oh yeah, the Democratic Party wants to take care of health care, tell you what to eat, tell you how to live, but they can barely handle this small caucus as we saw last night. | ||
Complete disaster. | ||
Midge, who do you think, if we had seen the results, who do you think would have been the most popular candidate to come out of last night? | ||
unidentified
|
Well, it's probably going to be Bernie Sanders, right? | |
Because I think that he's the one that sort of has been pulling ahead slowly but surely. | ||
And he's a guy that they really do not want. | ||
I mean, the DNC already destroyed him once, and it looks like they're going to want to do that again. | ||
This is actually breaking news that just came out, and it looks like you were almost entirely correct. | ||
Pete Buttigieg was 62%. | ||
This is now 20 hours later, and we finally have some of the results trickling in. | ||
Pete Buttigieg is at 26.9%. | ||
Bernie Sanders follows him at 25.1%. | ||
Elizabeth Warren at 18.3%. | ||
And Joe Biden in fourth place, a rather pathetic showing, At 15.6%. | ||
And this has just come in during this segment while we've been on the air. | ||
What do you make of Pete Buttigieg? | ||
I mean, it's still too close to call. | ||
Bernie could easily pull ahead. | ||
But nobody, I don't think, predicted Mayor Pete of all people. | ||
What are your thoughts on that in our last 45 seconds here? | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a bit surprised, but I also don't entirely trust these numbers either. | |
So it'll be interesting to see if this holds true throughout some of the other caucuses. | ||
But I'm impressed, I guess, if those numbers are correct. | ||
Good for Mayor Pete, but I have not seen that level of enthusiasm for him at any protests or at any of these events that I've been to. | ||
I've seen very minimal support for him, so I'm surprised. | ||
I am too, Midge. I wasn't expecting Mayor Pete to come out as number one, and I think there is going to be a lot of questioning and speculation around his number one status, especially after all the ties to his campaign and, of course, the company who funded the app that was being used yesterday. | ||
So very interesting that he's now number one. | ||
But Midge, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Stay safe out there, please. | ||
You said you like to go to as many protests as possible. | ||
Please stay safe. People are getting crazy out there. | ||
And of course, folks, you can go follow her on Twitter and Instagram at FogCityMidge. | ||
Thank you again for joining us. | ||
And Tom Pappert and I will be back on the other side to talk the polls that just broke and more breaking news. | ||
This is the War Room, and this is breaking news. | ||
Finally, again, I think it's been over 20 hours, if my math is correct, since the voting began. | ||
Since we were supposed to start getting the information, we now have some preliminary results from the Iowa caucus, which of course was held last night. | ||
They had all kinds of issues. | ||
An app broke. | ||
People were taking screenshots on their phone and then sending them to a woman who printed them out to then drive them to the main office. | ||
Well, now we can report, according to The Guardian and about a hundred other sources, Pete Bootedge Edge is currently leading with 27% of the delegates. | ||
Sanders is behind him in second place with 25% of the delegates. | ||
Then you have Elizabeth Pocahontas-Warren at 18% of the delegates and Joe Biden rounding up fourth place. | ||
Yes, fourth place with 16% of the delegates. | ||
Interestingly though, and all of these could change, this could change any moment now. | ||
These are still coming in. | ||
It's only 62% reported, but The Guardian notes, although Pete Buttigieg leads the caucus results, Bernie Sanders is leading the popular vote count. | ||
Bernie Sanders has 28,220 votes so far against Buttigieg's 27,030 votes. | ||
So Bernie is so far winning the popular vote but losing the delegate race. | ||
Again, the results are only 62% in. | ||
We'll keep checking back. | ||
But Savannah, it does beg the question, does it not, how did Mayor Pete No, last night. | ||
He gave his victory speech last night. | ||
How on earth do you think Mayor Pete had such a good idea that he would be the winner so far? | ||
I mean, as somebody who funded the app, as someone who has organizers in his campaign that worked for Acronym, which was Investor in Shadow Inc., I really don't know how he could have speculated that he would be number one. | ||
And, you know, the reason why, too, it is very interesting that he is number one is, just as Mitch pointed out, he really hasn't had... | ||
That much popularity, as much as Bernie Sanders, and I mean, as you just showed too, Bernie does have the popular vote, but I didn't think that Buttigieg had enough, I guess, momentum to be the number one person coming out of this. | ||
So that's very interesting to me. | ||
And you know, it seems that one interesting thing to note is that of course, Elizabeth Warren is widely swallowing up a lot of Bernie's potential supporters. | ||
She used to just be a mainline Democrat. | ||
She was best friends with Hillary Clinton during the 2016 campaign. | ||
But now in 2020 Elizabeth Warren is adopting all of Bernie Sanders policies, virtually every single one. | ||
And just like Bernie, she has no plan to pay for any of them other than tax the rich. | ||
So the argument has been made, and I think it's fair, that if Elizabeth Warren were not in this race, Bernie's support would then be swelling because that's 18% of the results that the most similar candidate would be Bernie Sanders. | ||
So I do think that it is, as you pointed out, it's very suspect though that Mayor Pete, who $42,500 to the shadow Inc. | ||
for the purpose of renting data or something like that, plus one of Pete Buttigieg's people works at a company that funded this Shadow organization. | ||
I mean, and of course, the Shadow organization is run by Bernie Sanders, but I Hillary Clinton people. | ||
Hillary Clinton people are running Pete Buttigieg. | ||
It all just seems like, you know, the writers of House of Cards could not make it this obvious. | ||
And you know, Tom, did you see this story too? | ||
Des Moines Register polls gold standard Iowa poll after Buttigieg may have been left off. | ||
Apparently there was a potential error that was brought to their attention by the campaign of Pete Buttigieg and that resulted in the Iowa poll being canceled. | ||
Right, and that was just a day or two before the election. | ||
A lot of folks were reporting, but it could not be completely confirmed, of course, that that poll actually showed Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren with comfortable leads over the other candidates. | ||
But, I mean, I certainly agree with Midge that it seems very unlikely that Pete Buttigieg is going to be the nominee. | ||
Come the end of the cycle, come this summer when they officially announce this, and I believe it's in Milwaukee, I just don't see that happening. | ||
I do not see Mr. Mayor Pete Bootedge Edge being the guy who leads us. | ||
And that's what I wanted to bring up too, Tom, is people within his own city don't even like him. | ||
He doesn't even have popularity among his own constituents. | ||
So how is he going to garner the attention of the rest of America? | ||
And I guess Bernie's internal numbers that they released last night were accurate because we are seeing Joe Biden now in that fourth place spot. | ||
Again, very sad numbers for a former vice president. | ||
And the popularity surrounding Joe Biden has decreased. | ||
It continues to decrease. | ||
And he just he doesn't have the momentum to keep moving forward and to be the candidate. | ||
So it's going to be very interesting to see how the Democrats continue to try to push Joe Biden forward as he continues to cripple his own campaign. | ||
Well, and it is interesting. | ||
So here is the full list. | ||
It goes Mayor Pete, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden. | ||
And then beneath Joe Biden, who has 217 votes for the delegates, 210 votes for the delegates. | ||
Joe Biden is 170 for Amy Klobuchar. | ||
And then it goes down to Andrew Yang, who only has 14, Tom Steyer, Michael Bennett, Michael Bloomberg, people who could not even be on the polls. | ||
So this is really devastating for Joe Biden. | ||
You're absolutely correct that that is devastating. | ||
The main takeaway here, one, is how on earth did Mayor Pete know about this? | ||
It seems functionally impossible. | ||
You didn't know about this. | ||
I didn't know about this. The DNC didn't know about this. | ||
Nobody knew about this except apparently Mayor Pete himself and perhaps the people's shadow. | ||
And then second, with Joe Biden being propped up with both hands by the media, by the Democrats who tried to impeach President Trump for the sake of saving Biden some embarrassment. | ||
Every single person out there has been working for the express purpose of getting this man who kisses his granddaughter on the lips, who sniffs people's heads, who touches people. | ||
He has leg hair that stands up in the pool and kids like to rub it. | ||
He faced off with corn pop, for God's sake, and this is the guy who is trailing in number four. | ||
It's going to be very interesting to see if Biden tries to stick this thing out for a few months, as we saw with Jeb Bush in 2016, or if Biden just calls it quits in the coming days. | ||
Yeah, I really don't know what the Democrats are planning to do. | ||
Because again, Buttigieg, where's the support? | ||
Where's the real support in America surrounding him? | ||
Elizabeth Warren, known liar, nobody likes her. | ||
And again, Joe Biden hasn't had the momentum since day one. | ||
And they don't want Bernie Sanders to have that nomination. | ||
So who knows what's going to happen after this. | ||
A lot of people are saying too, because the results of this were so delayed, that of course they can't necessarily be trusted. | ||
And we need to look to New Hampshire next. | ||
To see, I guess, who really is coming out on top, who really is number one. | ||
So I don't know, maybe Joe Biden will have a higher ranking in the polls there. | ||
Well, and it is, of course, worth noting that these are still preliminary. | ||
I'm looking down at my phone is where I'm getting this. | ||
This is breaking news. And it is still only, I'm wondering, we might be stalled out. | ||
We may not get the full picture even today. | ||
Of course, earlier in the day, the Iowa Democrat Party said they would endeavor to get at least 50% of the results out by 5 o'clock Eastern, 4 o'clock Central. | ||
It came out at about 4.30, it seems. | ||
Well, now it seems to be stalled at 62.27% of precincts reporting. | ||
As all the precincts report, we don't even have time to break this down and figure out which precincts these are to know if they are more centrist-leaning or perhaps more in Bernie's camp. | ||
But it's a very good possibility that by the time this is finished, in another, who knows, maybe it'll be another 20 hours, Bernie Sanders could wind up being in the lead. | ||
It is a very, very tight situation. | ||
Tight race still, 20 hours later, Savannah. | ||
But as it stands, the number one takeaway that everybody can say, you're absolutely right, this is devastating for Joe Biden. | ||
The question at the Biden camp has to be right now, do we bail out today or do we wait for New Hampshire? | ||
Right, Tom. And also, something else that I did want to bring up is the State of the Union is tonight as well. | ||
Several Democrats have already come forward and said that they are going to be boycotting the event. | ||
Of course, we have our freshman Democrats, Ayanna Pressley, Ilhan Omar, and AOC, who have come forward and said that they're going to be boycotting it. | ||
They're not going to be attending tonight, as well as Maxine Waters and Al Green. | ||
I did just want to divert from that for a second and bring up that news because that's also something that is being talked about right now. | ||
Well, and that is, it ties into this nicely because, of course, the Democrats are doing everything they can to invalidate President Trump's presidency to make it seem as though it is not the actual president. | ||
And meanwhile, they're likely doing this. | ||
I mean, the Democrats are going to be in complete and utter damage control mode for the next foreseeable future to try to take the focus away from their inability to hold a caucus, something that's been done for hundreds and hundreds of years now in Iowa. | ||
They're going to try and distract from this and make it seem as though all is well. | ||
You're, of course, watching The War Room. | ||
We'll be right back. I'm Tom Papert, editor-in-chief of NationalFile.com, here with Savannah Hernandez, breaking down the election results. | ||
We finally got them! 20 hours late! | ||
Welcome back. You are watching The War Room. | ||
I'm Tom Papert, editor-in-chief of NationalFile.com, here with the very, very insightful Savannah Hernandez, who's doing a great job getting better and more impressive every single day she's on the air. | ||
Of course, she has been behind the scenes for many years. | ||
I'm glad that she finally stepped out We're here discussing the breaking news, which I suppose is all we're going to get. | ||
The Iowa results were starting to trickle in. | ||
The party said they would try to get at least half of the precincts and what their vote tallies were by 4 p.m. | ||
Central Standard Time. | ||
Well, it's now 4.47 and we are still at just over half. | ||
It has been stuck at 62.27%. | ||
It does not appear that we're going to get any more information about what happened last night in Iowa for some time, which raises even more questions. | ||
Because Mayor Pete somehow thought he was going to be the winner last night, and so far he is the winner by less than two percentage points, so that it could still very, very, very easily change. | ||
But the narrative seems to be set. | ||
It does make one wonder if the Democrats are attempting to reinforce this narrative that Mayor Pete did in fact win, and then when the 100% comes out, that may not be true. | ||
Savannah did a fantastic job of breaking down Mayor Pete's Relationship, let's say, to Shadow, the organization behind the technology used last night in the disgraceful, totally botched caucus. | ||
Shadow was paid $42,500 by Mayor Pete for something along the lines of data rentals. | ||
Then it turns out that one of the top people at the other shadowy organization that funded Shadow now works for Mayor Pete. | ||
So there's an interesting clip out there where even the left is beginning to wonder about this mystery app and the Shadow company behind it. | ||
Let's go to clip 19. | ||
unidentified
|
Tell us about the app. | |
You were just regaling us with what you've learned about the app. | ||
So, the app is brand new this year. | ||
The Democratic Party and I are kind to tell anybody who had developed the app, but we do know it wasn't one of the apps you could get on Apple. | ||
This was privately sourced, privately done, and privately distributed just a couple of days ago, we understand. | ||
to the various caucus chairpeople so that they could file these results more efficiently, more accurately. | ||
They call the app a fancy calculator. | ||
Well, it turns out not to be so fancy, apparently. | ||
One of the first issues with the app is that party folk were supposed to download it onto their own personal cell phones. | ||
We already had talked to 12 various caucus leaders who were having trouble downloading it. | ||
And we actually have a copy. | ||
I think the control room can put it up. | ||
It says, Tess Ferry, your app is ready to download. | ||
But with these words, listen to this. | ||
This type of file can harm your device. | ||
Do you want to keep app release APK anyway? | ||
Yikes. Well, you might imagine that a few people were hesitant to download this. | ||
So that seems to be at least part of the problem. | ||
And the Democratic Party is saying the app did not go down. | ||
Yeah. And this is not a hack or an intrusion. | ||
But if the hack failed because nobody was able to or willing to put it on their phone to use it, that is a form of failure. | ||
unidentified
|
Well, and if you couldn't get onto it, apparently people were having trouble logging onto it as well. | |
Yeah. So, hence the long phone. | ||
Ultimately, what you said at the outset, Cynthia, thank God there is paper, is true. | ||
unidentified
|
I mean, what we will have from Iowa, I think our best guess, is we will ultimately have a correct And you know what's so funny that Rachel Maddow just said, we will have correct results one day. | |
Just like Tom just pointed out, we're only getting 62% of those results from last night, and I doubt we'll get much more from that. | ||
But, you know, reports are also saying too, Tom, that last week the Democrats were warned about potential problems with this app and the DHS head actually claimed that the Democrats refused to let them test the app for failures. | ||
So, of course, at the end of the day, there's no one to blame but the Democratic Party themselves for this complete mess, this complete disaster. | ||
And like you said too, I doubt we're going to get any more than the 62% of results that we already have. | ||
Well, certainly not during this show's broadcast. | ||
I mean, it may not be until tomorrow. | ||
I mean, people were joking last night. | ||
We may not get the results until after New Hampshire, and that's seeming more and more likely. | ||
But you're absolutely right, Savannah. | ||
This falls squarely on the shoulders of the Democrat Party, the people who created this app, the people who thought it would be a good idea to use this app, the people who paid for this app's creation. | ||
It's rather pathetic if you assume that they're incompetent. | ||
If you assume that this was done intentionally, then perhaps... | ||
It's incredibly clever because this does, especially if this is all we're going to get. | ||
I mean, this is the end of the news day on the East Coast. | ||
It's officially the end of the news day in the central part of the country. | ||
We're going to keep going. The news day is over, Savannah. | ||
And for now, Mayor Pete Bootedge Edge, who fillates his beer bottles, I don't know if that's okay to say or not, but it certainly seems to be strange when he does it. | ||
Mayor Pete Bootedge Edge is the winner, as far as we know now. | ||
And we're going to not know anything else for an undetermined amounts of time. | ||
It's completely bizarre. | ||
Definitely, Tom. | ||
And of course, too, one of the biggest takeaways from this poll that I'm seeing on social media that I'm seeing from other news sources is the fact that Joe Biden came in force. | ||
A lot of people are not really stunned about this, but saying that this is a huge failure on Joe Biden's part, too. | ||
He's been in politics for decades. | ||
So the fact that he came in force behind a mayor is a really bad look and just very telling of, I guess, him in politics as a whole. | ||
You talked about Biden's record. | ||
This is the guy who created the infamous crime law that made it so a white person who does cocaine would get a much more lenient sentence than a black person who does crack. | ||
Joe Biden wanted to use his legislation to tear down buildings where raves were had in the 80s and 90s. | ||
This guy has truly done absolutely nothing during his time in Congress, of course, except fail at presidential runs. | ||
As vice president for Obama, he said very, very, I mean, there's that website that's got all of his creepy quotes, all of his groping, joebiden.info. | ||
He said things like the president has a big stick, referring to President Obama. | ||
This is a guy who essentially has gone his entire political career doing virtually nothing. | ||
And so perhaps it shouldn't be so surprising that Mayor Pete is not just edging him out, but potentially winning in Iowa. | ||
Again, the question I think is going to be in the Biden camp. | ||
Do I drop out today? | ||
Do I do my speech? Do I wait till after the State of the Union? | ||
Or do we see how New Hampshire goes? | ||
I do want to jump in too, because I'm just thinking back before I really paid attention to politics and I just used to scroll through social media, kind of peruse memes. | ||
And I remember Joe Biden being Obama's best friend. | ||
They had friendship bracelets and people used to make memes about how funny Joe Biden was and how he was just this great counterpart to Obama. | ||
He was this amazing guy. | ||
He was funny. He was the best vice president ever. | ||
And so now that I'm paying attention to politics and now that I'm paying attention to the way that America really reacts with Joe Biden, it's just very interesting to me now to think back on how social media and I guess, yeah, people in general try to portray Joe Biden and how they've been trying to prop him up for years, but the American public really doesn't want Joe Biden. | ||
They've been trying to say that, you know, he's the next president. | ||
But even when I started listening to Joe Biden at the beginning of his campaign, my main takeaway from Joe Biden was, okay, all he does is say, oh, I was Obama's vice president under Obama's administration. | ||
So all he has done is use Obama's name to gain popularity. | ||
And now that he has to stand on his own and be his own person, nobody likes him. | ||
And everyone's like, yeah, outside of Obama, it's a no from me. | ||
unidentified
|
It's a no from me. Well, that's such a great point. | |
I mean, we even saw in one of the first debates, the Democrat debates, where they came out and they attacked Obama because it was a proxy to attack Joe Biden. | ||
They said that Obama, it's wrong that Obama deported so many illegal immigrants. | ||
It's wrong that Obama had such a hard-line policy against illegal immigration, that Obama was not a good liberal. | ||
So now the left, led by AOC, Arianna Pressley, Ilhan Omar. | ||
And now, of course, Bernie Sanders jumping in with that lot. | ||
The Democrat Party, at least the fringe socialist that may not be so fringe anymore. | ||
I mean, even if Bernie is in second place, that's a quarter of the vote. | ||
And he won the popular vote, which is absolutely ironic. | ||
But even if that is the case, they're turning on Obama, and so Joe Biden has absolutely nothing to stand on. | ||
I mean, Savannah, this is a guy who lost in 1988 because he lied about his college education. | ||
He claimed that he went on a full scholarship. | ||
He did not. This is a guy who saw a political speech in the United Kingdom where a guy talked about his life. | ||
He said, oh, I'm descended from coal farmers, and we were middle-class working people in the In the hard parts of the country, Joe Biden took that and made that into his own life story. | ||
Sorry, Tom. I thought you were talking about Elizabeth Warren there for a second. | ||
unidentified
|
Those lies marry each other so perfectly. | |
You're absolutely right. | ||
I mean, and so in 1988, a reporter asked Biden, do you have family that's a coal miner? | ||
And the campaign responded, yes, distant family up in the tree. | ||
I mean, it is. You're right. That's the same exact story as Elizabeth Warren and with the high cheekbones and the family story that was handed down for generations, so it must be true. | ||
Yeah, and I'm pretty sure she tried to come forward, too, and say that one of her family members was a janitor. | ||
I think that was Elizabeth Warren. | ||
Gosh, this is just so ridiculous. | ||
It's so funny now that you're bringing up all this old stuff about these politicians. | ||
It's just, they're all exactly the same. | ||
That's so crazy to me. And again, too, probably why Bernie Sanders does have so much popularity because he at least has his own, I guess, ideas and he has his own lies apart from everyone else, such as Elizabeth Warren and Joe Biden. | ||
Tom Papert and Savannah Hernandez here in the War Room last hour coming up after this short break. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room, everybody. | ||
All right, I just took my brain force, so I should be nice and pepped up for this last hour with Tom Pappert, where we're going to be covering the coronavirus. | ||
We have Jacob Engels coming up with us as well, who's gonna be talking to us about an exclusive story that he reported on at the Central Florida Post. | ||
But Tom, before we get into that, before we bring Jacob on, of course, we wanna take this opportunity to thank the viewers and thank Alex for propping up this whole entire great organization and funding us through the InfoWars store, funding us with amazing products like Brain Force Plus, one of my favorites. | ||
Y'all, I used to wake up every morning and this used to be a part of my daily routine. | ||
I ran out and I've been so busy. | ||
I haven't been able to order another bottle, but it's 25% off at the Infowars store right now. | ||
So I'd highly recommend you go and grab some. | ||
If you're not a morning person like me, you take two of these and you're focused and awake, alert in the morning. | ||
The mornings are always the hardest for me because, like I said, I wake up, I don't want to get out of bed. | ||
I'd rather lay in bed until 10 a.m., but I can't do that here because we are constantly working and breaking news for you folks. | ||
So Brain Force is how I get up and get through my day. | ||
Stay alert. 25% off right now at the store. | ||
And of course, too, like Tom and I had pointed out previously... | ||
The coronavirus is still something that is breaking every single day. | ||
We're finding out new things about this virus. | ||
The disease is continuing to spread globally. | ||
And luckily for all of our viewers and listeners, we have water filters, air filters, face masks, storable foods for everyone so that they can go and be safe, protect themselves from the inside and the outside with all of our great products on the store. | ||
Tom, you were talking about the water filters and the air filters earlier. | ||
What are some of the other products that you'd recommend to our listeners? | ||
Well, you know, if you've got your storable food, if you've got your water filter and your air filter, the number one thing that I think makes sense is to then look for things that are going to boost your immune system. | ||
We've had Dr. Steve Pacinic on the show. | ||
You and I spoke to him last week, Savannah, and he said that in his medical opinion, anybody who has a healthy immune system will more than likely walk away from this thing We're good to go. | ||
Welcome to my show! | ||
I mean, Alex even says he doesn't like the name of it, but I have been sold on the immune gargle for well over a year now. | ||
As soon as I started traveling, whether it be to Austin, Texas to appear in studio at InfoWars or to Washington, D.C. for various events there. | ||
Anywhere I go in the country, I make sure I have that small bottle TV viewers can see. | ||
I have the pocket size less than the government issued TSA required amount that I can take on with me onto the plane. | ||
I don't even risk it. | ||
I don't put it into the checked luggage. | ||
That thing stays on my person from the second after I get out of TSA, and I use it nonstop when I travel. | ||
It's kept me from being sick when I have to go down to Texas and appear live on the set. | ||
The last thing you want is me sneezing and coughing live on the air. | ||
It keeps me from getting sick when I fly back. | ||
These are of course germ factories. | ||
Now when you have coronavirus, we're staring down the double barrel of a coronavirus shotgun here. | ||
It's one of the best things you can do if you have to go out to a mall, if you have to travel, if you have to go to a crowded place, especially if you're in one of these cities that already has either suspected or confirmed people who are sick with coronavirus. | ||
And worst case scenario, you have a product that is going to save you who knows how much time sick in bed. | ||
I absolutely love that product. | ||
And if I do ever get a tingle, I know I'm getting sick. | ||
I use the immune gargle as it is suggested on the label. | ||
More multiple times a day, and I don't end up getting the cold. | ||
It goes away the very next day. | ||
I cannot say enough things about Super Blue Silver Immune Gargle, one of the best products. | ||
And of course, storable food is important too. | ||
But Savannah, we're going to be joined next segment, as you said, by Jacob Engels. | ||
He's got a new story out on The Gateway Pundit. | ||
Military facility in New Jersey ordered people not to support Trump, at least publicly. | ||
It's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
Don't go away. We'll be back with him on the other side. | ||
Welcome back to The War Room. | ||
I'm Tom Papert, guest hosting and co-hosting here with Savannah Hernandez. | ||
Our guest for this segment is, of course, Jacob Angles. | ||
He's a phenomenal writer. | ||
He has his own website. He also reports for The Gateway Pundit and others. | ||
He has an exclusive new article about the absurdity that's happening in our military right now. | ||
Here's the headline. Military facility in New Jersey. | ||
Remove all Trump gear before a Democratic congressman's visit. | ||
So Jacob, I know you're on the line with us. | ||
This is a ridiculous story. | ||
It shows, as you illustrate well, a double standard in our nation's military. | ||
Break this down for us. | ||
Absolutely, and thanks for having me on. | ||
It's great to be back on the program. | ||
So what happened is we had a military facility in New Jersey, Fort Dix, Lakehurst, and I got a tip from a very brave Marine there who's mentioned in the article. | ||
He said he wanted to put his name in there. | ||
He didn't want it to be anonymous, and he said they came through on Friday before this Monday's visit from Democrat Congressman Andy Kim, a known Trumpeter, impeachment fanatic, and were told That you are not allowed to have any Trump here. | ||
You're not allowed to have any Trump memorabilia, any signs, because this guy is going to be offended and have a meltdown. | ||
And I just find that to be very, very wrong. | ||
It's not right. And this Marine, this brave Marine, who now works at the military facility, he said, Everyone here that supports the president, we're middle-class people. | ||
We are people who work hard with our hands. | ||
We're people who want to support President Trump because of the tax cuts, because of the economy, and because of strengthening our border. | ||
Yet, they're not allowed to show support for the president. | ||
And Jacob, within this story too, you said that the Marine that you were interviewing said that while he was serving under Obama, there were recommendations that they don't speak ill of the president. | ||
And now we're seeing basically the opposite of that happening in this situation. | ||
Yeah. No, it's 100 percent. | ||
And thanks, everyone, for bearing with me. | ||
I'm in the InfoWars tank Florida edition here going to a State of the Union watch party. | ||
But yeah, he told us about the just difference of how when he was in the Marines during the Obama era, it was kind of a wink, wink, nod, nod. | ||
You can't challenge the commander in chief, which is true. | ||
You know, that's kind of your boss. | ||
That's your CEO, if you will. | ||
And that's The problem that we see here. | ||
These people are not respecting Trump as a CEO. They're not respecting him as their boss. | ||
And you can't do that. | ||
I mean, you can't go around crap talking your boss and then expect to get a good performance review or to be patted on the head. | ||
And this damn congressman wants to come We're good to go. | ||
So I wonder if you can kind of contrast that for us, because when President Trump—I mean, we see the photos, and then somehow they try to get the troops in trouble when they try to go up and wear a MAGA hat or if President Trump signs something. | ||
But kind of contrast how this no-name Democrat who is an impeachment fanatic, how he treats our nation's troops with how President Trump treats our nation's troops when he visits these type of facilities or just comes into contact with them in any way. | ||
Yeah, here's the biggest— I think we're good to go. | ||
He put his life on the line. | ||
He was over there risking life in the limb. | ||
And they're painting the story like he's modern-day Jack Ryan or a G.I. Joe out there on the battlefield. | ||
And what did this guy do? | ||
Some reports say that he was working as a low-level intern and national security analyst. | ||
So stolen valor. | ||
He doesn't respect this country. | ||
He doesn't even hold a torch to the way President Trump treats our troops and treats this nation. | ||
And then he has the gall. | ||
And has the audacity to tell people who are protecting and preserving our nation that they need to take down their sticker because his feelings are going to get hurt? | ||
And Jacob, too, some people I'm sure would say that this is an infringement of their First Amendment right. | ||
What do you think about that? Do you think that, I guess, if we allow this to happen, that it can turn into a bigger thing? | ||
Absolutely. You know, I understand you're in a workplace. | ||
There might be some rules against what you can have up in the workplace. | ||
That goes from private to public sector. | ||
That's understandable. But what we're talking about here is a military base with a lot of people who are veterans or people who are currently enlisted and people who are serving in another capacity doing something for our nation. | ||
I think when it comes to workplace rules about free speech or what you're allowed to have in your workspace, They get a lot more leeway than if you're sitting in your cubicle at IBM or the public school teacher who shouldn't have something displayed in the classroom that shows bias. | ||
I mean, they do so much for our country. | ||
If we're arguing over if you have a bumper sticker or a Trump 2020 pin, it's just sickening. | ||
But I want them to keep doing this. | ||
I want these deep state actors and these Democrats and the media to keep doing things like this and pressuring people, because what does it equal? | ||
unidentified
|
Four more years, baby. | |
Well, I think you make a good point there. | ||
And you mentioned in the article, of course, Kim is one of these people who got into office in the so-called blue wave where the House narrowly took back, or the Democrats narrowly took back the House. | ||
He is now considered one of the most vulnerable Democrats out there come 2020 when President Trump will be on the ballot. | ||
So in our final couple minutes here, tell us, what do you think behavior like this is going to do to Kim's reelection chances come November of this year? | ||
I don't think it's looking good for Mr. | ||
Kim, and he's just a little goober. | ||
Look at him there on the screen. | ||
He won by a very small margin. | ||
This is a very Republican district. | ||
This is a district that doesn't respect this type of behavior, and you have a strong crop of Republican candidates. | ||
We're running against him currently, and I believe competition is going to bring the best candidate forward in that primary, and it must be a pro-Trump candidate. | ||
It must be an America First candidate. | ||
We cannot go back to the trash heap of failed ideas from these moderates and these Romney types. | ||
It's done us no good. | ||
So as long as we have a hard-line America First Trump candidate that comes out of that GOP primary, I would hammer it home day and day and day. | ||
Congressman Kim, why did you lie about your record, your military record? | ||
Oh wait, that's right, there is no military record. | ||
Were you an intern? Were you a little paper pusher? | ||
What did you do over there, sit in a nice air conditioning tent while people are getting blown up into a million pieces and losing their friends? | ||
On the battlefield? And then you want to come back home and paint yourself as some hero? | ||
He's not a hero. He's a coward. | ||
And that's the line I will go with every single time, is you're a coward. | ||
You're a coward. You're a coward. | ||
Stand up, Mr. Kim. | ||
Stand up and be something. | ||
Be a bigger person. | ||
But he can't. He's just a small, small man. | ||
And I'm glad that you are bringing light to this Democratic congressman and his background, who he really is as a person. | ||
And, you know, in the article too, you said that he jumped on the impeachment train, the impeachment bandwagon of President Trump, even though he's one of New Jersey's most vulnerable Democrats. | ||
And I think, too, you know, we had our last guest on, Fog City Midge, and she was talking about how at the Women's March, the hatred of Donald Trump has really dwindled down. | ||
So I feel like for this congressman, it's going to be the exact same thing for him in his re-election. | ||
It's just the hate of Donald Trump, the, you know, jumping on the impeachment bandwagon, and just that whole entire, I guess, mindset is not going to help him get re-elected. | ||
No, it's not going to help them get reelected, but we're going to let them keep digging the hole and keep burying themselves in their own stupidity. | ||
And you can't even run a caucus. | ||
You can't even run a caucus. | ||
How are you going to beat Donald Trump? | ||
I could run a freaking caucus for student body president in like 11th grade. | ||
I can do it in high school. | ||
How are there grown people out there? | ||
And this guy's flipping the coin, and then it's in his hand, and then he's flipping it over here. | ||
It's like he's doing a magic trick. | ||
But you see, you did not have a very well-funded organization called Shadow helping you, so I don't know how you were able to do it either. | ||
You must be a genius. We'll be right back. | ||
This is The War Room. | ||
I'm Tom Papert here co-hosting with Savannah Hernandez. | ||
Our guest is Jacob Engels, who just kind of touched on the Democrats' inability to run a caucus. | ||
And of course, Jacob is a fantastic journalist. | ||
He's been dubbed by the media as though it's some kind of insult. | ||
He's been dubbed Roger Stone's mini-me. | ||
I think that's a great compliment personally. | ||
Jacob, you touched on what happened last night with this Iowa caucus. | ||
We now have the partial results, 62.27% of the precincts reporting. | ||
Pete Buttigieg is somehow winning so far, followed by Sanders, followed by Warren, followed by Biden in fourth place. | ||
I wanted to get your thoughts on this. | ||
Exorbitantly long time. I think it comes in about 20 hours we waited for these results to come in. | ||
What on earth do you make of what we've learned, and what do you think of the Democrats' inability to run a caucus? | ||
Well, I think the first thing that we learned is why in the hell do we allow Iowa to be the first in the nation? | ||
They can't run a caucus. | ||
But I just don't understand why we're allowing them to be the first in the nation anymore. | ||
And when it comes down to Buttigieg, it's interesting that he's ahead. | ||
But there's a video that came out today I saw on TMZ of this woman who was informed after she turned in the vote that Mayor Pete was gay. | ||
Look, I'm gay. I don't care. | ||
But if I'm running for political office and somebody voted for me and then the It's kind of unfair that you weren't upfront about that. | ||
It kind of shows what kind of campaign he was running in the Midwest and in a state like Iowa where we didn't see the husband a lot. | ||
We didn't see a lot of talk about his husband and him being a same-sex couple. | ||
So to me, I would wonder if we redid the Iowa results and everyone knew that Mayor Pete was gay if he would have done so well. | ||
Again, I don't care, but it seems kind of deceptive. | ||
I'm glad that you brought that up, Jacob, because that is a video that has been circulating, and I did want to get maybe even Tom's take on it because, you know, some people were saying, like you, it was deceptive of Mayor Pete, and maybe in the Midwest, his campaign was a lot different than other parts of the world. | ||
In the video, the woman says, oh, it was common knowledge that he was gay, so you should have known, but, I mean, you did just bring up a really great point that perhaps... | ||
Bush judges campaigning in the Midwest was different from maybe, let's say, California or New York, which is why people there were not aware. | ||
Yeah, and again, his campaign staffer, hats off to her. | ||
She handled that situation very well, and she made the best case she could. | ||
Say, hey, you know, we love who we want to love. | ||
It doesn't necessarily change who he is as a person. | ||
All of these sentiments I kind of agree with. | ||
However, If you're running for political office and there's a certain lifestyle choice that you're making that I don't agree with and you don't tell me about that or you obfuscate that or you kind of cloak that based on where you're going, I understand, Mayor Pete. | ||
You don't have to walk out there with the feather boa and the thong like it's gay day everywhere you go. | ||
I get it, man. But you have to be honest with voters. | ||
They have to know what they're getting. | ||
And it's a package deal when you get somebody for president. | ||
They get you and your significant other or your bachelor. | ||
And so for him to do that is really not fair to me. | ||
And I think going forward, he needs to be upfront about it. | ||
Own yourself. Be proud of it. | ||
It's the Democratic Party, man. | ||
You don't have to be ashamed. | ||
You don't even have to be ashamed in the Republican Party anymore. | ||
But for him to Just be very dishonest about that. | ||
It makes me wonder what else will he be dishonest about if he were to ever be elected president. | ||
I mean, I know the CIA would love to have him as president. | ||
I do have a question though, Jacob. | ||
Many people I feel like would say that if Buttigieg used the whole LGBTQ angle, that would be him pandering more to that community and it wasn't something that needed to be as known for his run for president. | ||
What would you say to those people who bring up, I guess, that argument? | ||
Are there people in the Democratic Party that would bring up that Sensible people like us would sit there and say, this really doesn't matter about you. | ||
You make a great point. | ||
I think sensible people, honest people, logical people, people on our side would say, hey, I don't care if you're gay, straight, Space alien, whatever. | ||
If you believe in America first, you're with us. | ||
But in the Democratic Party, they have made it so much, it is their ethos, it is their identity, if you are gay. | ||
So to me, it's contradictory to the party that he's involved in right now, because they're telling people that you have to, they would tell somebody like me that the only part about my identity that matters is that I'm gay. | ||
Not that I'm an American. | ||
Not that I'm a conservative. | ||
Not that I'm a journalist or that I like to hang out with my labradoodle. | ||
I mean, they don't care about any of that. | ||
They just say, oh, gay. All right, good. | ||
And so Mayor Pete not doing that is a little weird. | ||
So, Jacob, in the video, we haven't shown it, except silently, some of the viewers can probably see, the woman brings up, you know, the biblical definition of marriage and says, you know, that doesn't seem right to me, that's what I believe. | ||
I'm curious, because Mayor Pete used to, I mean, not that long ago, a couple months, he would go on long lectures about his interpretation of the Bible and how most Christians are wrong and all this insanity. | ||
So, has that stopped? | ||
Because I don't remember reading anything about that for at least a couple months. | ||
I saw him stop mentioning Bible and Christianity in the Christian left a few debates ago. | ||
I saw him speak in Orlando, and it was very weird. | ||
I walk into this room, and he's in Orlando in Central Florida. | ||
Even being Orlando, downtown, metropolitan area, is pretty conservative in terms of the crowd that showed up from what I could see. | ||
And he was talking about guns. | ||
He was talking about God. | ||
He was talking about country. | ||
And I'm like... You know, is this a Republican or a Democrat running? | ||
Like, what's his game here? | ||
He seems to just be vacillating back and forth. | ||
He is who he wants to be and who he thinks you want him to be at a certain moment, and that's the most dangerous kind of politician. | ||
And the lady makes a great point. | ||
The biblical definition and Marriage was never supposed to be a construct of the state, right? | ||
This is a religious agreement that is something that you decide at church. | ||
And then the state, as it always does, sees money and sees the bureaucracy and takes it from being a religious construct to a construct of the state. | ||
So then we get involved in all this stuff about equal rights and da-da-da. | ||
Marriage. It's man and a woman. | ||
You know, I'm gay. I get that. | ||
But guess what? I can just go get a business agreement and get a contractual agreement through my attorney if I want to have the same protections that marriage has. | ||
And a lot of places, that's available now. | ||
And if it's not, go move there. | ||
I mean, it's a marketplace in the United States. | ||
So, Jacob, you're one of these people who has, of course, been banned off the Internet because you've been a journalist covering the Proud Boys for many years now. | ||
So it's very difficult for people to get in touch with you. | ||
Of course, they can read your work on your website and on the Gateway Pundit. | ||
Just tell folks, how can they get a hold of you? | ||
How can they follow you? | ||
How can they follow your work? | ||
Absolutely. Follow me on Instagram, at Jake Ingalls, J-A-K-E-E-N-G-E-L-S, and then centralfloridapost.com. | ||
TheGatewayPundit.com and I write some stuff from time to time on InfoWars.com and I hope to be back soon. | ||
It's good to see Savannah in the studio. | ||
I'm used to like, she used to be, hey Jake, are you ready to go on the program? | ||
And Alex kind of threw her into the pit here and she is doing a great job. | ||
Oh, thank you, Jacob. You're so sweet. | ||
And I always love listening to you and being able to be here on the show with you today was very informative and a lot of fun. | ||
So thank you so much for coming on with us today. | ||
And we will hopefully be having you on again very soon. | ||
Folks, centralfloridapost.com is the place to go for all of Jacob Engel's exclusives. | ||
And Tom Papper and Savannah Hernandez here today. | ||
Doing the last 30 minutes of the War Room, we are going to be wrapping up the show today by talking about coronavirus developments and updates. | ||
And any other results we hear about the Iowa caucus, we'll let you know. | ||
Jacob Engels, again, thank you so much for joining us. | ||
Great interview, as always. | ||
We'll be right back on the other side of this short break. | ||
While you wait for us, go to InfowarStore.com and get some brain force. | ||
It's currently 25% off. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
unidentified
|
Sorry about that, Tom. | |
Sorry, guys. Me and Tom are both so eager to get back into it and start talking to you guys about today's breaking news. | ||
So Savannah Hernandez and Tom Papert here for the last 30 minutes of the War Room today. | ||
We are going to be giving you guys the latest updates on the coronavirus, which, of course, we know the World Health Organization has deemed a global health emergency. | ||
Now, the second death outside of China due to the coronavirus has now been reported in Hong Kong. | ||
And... | ||
Also, Carrie Lam has talked to Hong Kong officials and said that they should not be wearing masks to save stocks for medical workers, referring to advice issued by the World Health Organization. | ||
Now, Tom, I am bringing light to the World Health Organization and reiterating that so much because, of course, this has been the organization that has told us that we need to grant China gratitude and respect for the way that they're handling This is the same organization who has admitted to working with Google to get all of their results and information about the virus, the top search on the internet. | ||
And you and I were talking as well, and people who talk online or on social media about this virus being a potential bioweapon are now being censored. | ||
So we're seeing the censorship in real time. | ||
We're seeing the World Health Organization and how they're trying to I guess... | ||
We put out news regarding this and how they're trying to handle this in the rest of the world. | ||
I wanted to bring up Carrie Lam and the fact that she has told Hong Kong officials not to wear masks, especially after the fact that the first death was reported in Hong Kong because, again, she was referred to advice issued by the World Health Organization. | ||
And even further, she herself was spotted wearing a mask this last Tuesday morning, Tom. | ||
So what do you make of all of this news and now the fact that we're seeing more reported deaths outside of China? | ||
Well, it's certainly hypocritical. | ||
I mean, it's masks for me, but not for thee. | ||
I mean, she delivered an entire speech wearing one of these masks. | ||
And Hong Kong, of course, we reported earlier this week on Infowars. | ||
Hong Kong, the nurses, the doctors, they all begged for this woman to shut down the borders before coronavirus could get into the country. | ||
Well, now it is in the country. | ||
And you know that you've been there, Savannah. | ||
I mean, it's a small, small area. | ||
I think it's 700,000 or something like that. | ||
Relatively small. And so when they are very concerned, and rightfully so, that they're going to be overwhelmed with Chinese people trying to flee the mainland, as everybody now knows, you can be completely asymptomatic with coronavirus for eight days. | ||
So people could flee from the mainland, get their way into Hong Kong, thinking they're going to be safe, they're in the land of capitalism and modern hospitals, only to find out, no, they were actually sick all along, and now they've contaminated who knows how many people, infected who knows how many people. | ||
So it's a real We're good to go. | ||
And it looks like these poor people have already suffered so much at the hands of mainland China. | ||
It looks like there might be more coming their way, Savannah. | ||
Definitely. And not only because of the coronavirus are people trying to wear masks, but also there's a thick death smog that's currently over Wuhan. | ||
And people are scared that it's because China is burning coronavirus bodies. | ||
This is fueling fears that the death toll inside of China is higher than what has been reported and videos have led to concerns that the smog is the result again from crematoriums burning coronavirus infected bodies 24 hours a day of course. | ||
The hospitals are being overwhelmed with bodies over there from victims of the coronavirus and in an effort to keep the virus from continuing to spread, they are sending the people straight to the crematoriums. | ||
Also, China is telling people that they're not allowed to hold funerals for victims of the virus because they need to be cremated as quickly as possible and this is just something that's happening on such a wide scale that they can't even handle it. | ||
And I did do a report, and we're going to be airing that in the next segment, Tom, just how much China has been stifling the true numbers of how many people are infected, how many people are dying. | ||
People are being arrested over there currently for taking videos or going on social media and putting out information or talking about the virus that isn't state media approved or issued out by state media. | ||
So that's the reality of life for people in China right now. | ||
And then again, too, that's stretching into Hong Kong. | ||
The Hong Kong protests originated from China trying to take over their city. | ||
And now we're seeing with Carrie Lam, she's trying to institute this no face masks thing that's going on. | ||
I also have a friend that lives in Hong Kong. | ||
Whenever I went over there, I got to meet him. | ||
He was one of the protesters and he was telling me that, of course, there have not been that many protests because they've had to stay inside. | ||
People are being quarantined because of this virus. | ||
People are scared to go out and the economy over there is really hurting. | ||
Reports are saying that's why China didn't want to initially report on how bad this pandemic was getting because we all know that was going to really hurt their economy. | ||
And this latest report came out too, Tom, and I want to get your comment on it. | ||
From Summit.News, a woman in China has been shot dead for attempting to break through a coronavirus roadblock. | ||
Now, this was a video that went viral on Twitter, and it's from Hubei County. | ||
Again, a woman said to have been shot dead after attempting to break a blockade set up to contain the coronavirus. | ||
What are your thoughts? | ||
Well, of course, China. | ||
I mean, nothing should really surprise us from communist China. | ||
They're the most totalitarian country on the face of the earth. | ||
The Communist Party are legitimately, as far as I'm concerned, evil human beings. | ||
They have no respect, no value for human life. | ||
This should be expected. | ||
We all know what they were willing to do to the Hong Kong protesters. | ||
We all know what they're doing in Wuhan. | ||
I mean, they are still saying, Savannah, it's still just a couple hundred people who have died from coronavirus. | ||
Meanwhile, they're saying that if they see an animal on the street, if it's somebody's pet, cat, dog, whatever you've got, they're going to kill it because it could have coronavirus. | ||
They're sending people, as you just pointed out, straight to the crematorium after they die. | ||
They have to do that if it's only a couple hundred people who have passed away from this virus. | ||
It's devastating. | ||
And the real, I mean, there's been all these articles about, oh, it's going to create all this anti-China sentiment. | ||
I mean, Savannah, and I think you agree, being that you've gone to Hong Kong. | ||
I feel enormous sympathy for the people living under the yoke of communism, being shot dead because you're trying to breach something. | ||
It's something that Americans would not stand for it. | ||
Something that Americans, we would be up in arms. | ||
And I honestly believe a lot of this comes because China has lived under communism for generations. | ||
These people have been bred at the point of a gun to be willing to deal with totalitarian leadership like this. | ||
And, you know, this is the Chinese government for you. | ||
They put out a fake screenshot where it was a trailer that you could find on Alibaba. | ||
And they said, ah, the new hospital is complete. | ||
The world is saved. | ||
All hail glorious leader Xi Jinping. | ||
Well, it took about 15 seconds for Twitter users in the West, where we actually have the freedom to think, to point out that this was fake. | ||
And a Chinese state-run newspaper wound up deleting the tweet in their embarrassment. | ||
You cannot trust the communist government. | ||
I have great sympathy for the Chinese people, and I hope that they're able to survive in the face of this Chinese government. | ||
Exactly, Tom. And already this is so much worse than that 2003 SARS outbreak that did take hundreds of lives. | ||
This has gotten exponentially worse than that. | ||
And, you know, you talked about China and just them being a communist government. | ||
Apparently they have gone full totalitarian mode. | ||
And Xi Jinping hasn't been in the media. | ||
He hasn't been the face of those state-run medias that we were talking about for days now. | ||
So, that's what's going on over there. | ||
He's pretty much disappearing from public view in the wake of this. | ||
And of course, that follows the World Health Organization, their director general coming forward and saying that China needs to be respected and looked to for how to handle this virus. | ||
But again, China is not being truthful with us on the true amount of numbers of people infected. | ||
They're not being honest with their own citizens. | ||
We've seen many videos coming out of citizens who are saying, you know, the effects of the virus and the symptoms of the virus are not what the government is telling us. | ||
People are throwing their animals out of windows because they're scared that their animals can spread the coronavirus even further. | ||
Because again, more disinformation is being spread in that country because it is the state-run media that is only giving these people a set amount of information. | ||
Me and Tom Papert will be back on the other side where we'll be giving you this exclusive report next. | ||
Welcome back to the final segment of The War Room. | ||
Savannah Hernandez in studio. | ||
I was co-hosting the show with my favorite Tom Papert and of course he gave such informative viewpoints today on the Iowa caucus and the disaster that that was. | ||
Last night we talked about the coronavirus. | ||
We are also joined by Fog City Midge and Jacob Angles who discussed Antifa in San Francisco and people being told not to wear MAGA hats around Democratic congressmen. | ||
So it was a very informative show and of course we wrapped it all up with some new breaking news on the coronavirus outbreak. | ||
Of course, the second reported death outside of China has now been reported in Hong Kong. | ||
I wanted to do a report yesterday about all of the lies that China has been telling us about the true severity of this virus and how they have been stifling these numbers. | ||
So I want to go ahead and play that exclusive report for you now. | ||
And again, before we do go to that, thank you so much to all of our listeners. | ||
And viewers for supporting me and Tom so that we're able to be here in studio today giving you all of this breaking news and information. | ||
Make sure you go to InfoWarsStore.com while you're listening to this breaking exclusive report and go grab some Brain Force. | ||
Go grab some storable foods or Tom's favorite, the Super Blue, the Super Silver products that help him any single time that he's Feeling a tingle in his throat or anything like that now is especially more important than ever to make sure that you're taking care of your internal health. | ||
Now folks, here is all of the ways that China has been lying to us about the severity of the coronavirus outbreak. | ||
The World Health Organization has officially declared the coronavirus a global health emergency and the virus has now spread to over 20 countries with 11 confirmed cases in the U.S. and in China the official death toll has risen to over 300 deaths with over 17,000 citizens infected. | ||
With Italy, Russia and the UK the most recent additions to the growing list of countries with confirmed cases worldwide and the first virus-related death outside of China reported in the Philippines, many are looking to China for answers about the reality of the spread and the severity of the virus which originated in Wuhan. | ||
The World Health Organization Director General has declared that China needs to be shown gratitude and respect and applauded for the extraordinary steps it has taken to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus. | ||
Where I met with President Xi Jinping. | ||
I left in absolutely no doubt about China's commitment to transparency and protecting the world's people. | ||
As I said it earlier, We should have actually expressed our respect and gratitude to China for what it's doing. | ||
It has already done incredible things to limit the transmission of the virus to other countries. | ||
And where respect is due, then you don't punish. | ||
And world leaders such as President Trump have also praised China for their transparency amid this unprecedented outbreak. | ||
But many have been questioning if the country, which has been known to downplay disease outbreaks in the past, is telling the truth and if their official numbers can be trusted. | ||
Let's take a look back at China's handling of the SARS outbreak back in 2003. | ||
It took China five months to announce the SARS outbreak to the public, resulting in over 700 deaths, with the epidemic spreading to over 20 different countries. | ||
The country's reluctance to give out information and continuous downplaying of the situation helped the illness quickly spread and created a global distrust of China from the rest of the world. | ||
While China is now being praised for their response to the coronavirus, they are still actively suppressing information from the world by censoring and arresting citizens who speak out about the virus. | ||
They have already been caught spreading propaganda within the media, and the high growth of cases from day to day has led many to question their official numbers. | ||
U.S. Senator Tom Cotton has been one of the most outspoken voices that has accused China of downplaying the amount of deaths related to the coronavirus. | ||
He also took to Twitter to share that there was a 28% increase in coronavirus cases overnight in China. | ||
Make no mistake, though, these aren't new cases, just what China is willing to admit. | ||
And China has already been caught pushing propaganda using a stock photo as evidence for one of the hospitals it is building for patients. | ||
The photo was shared on Twitter from the verified accounts of Global Times and People's Daily, both of which are Chinese state-run media outlets. | ||
It was also tweeted out by the Deputy Director General of the Information Department in the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs. | ||
However, people were quick to point out that the image provided by the Global Times was a stock photo that was available on the Internet months prior to their tweet. | ||
The image and all tweets have since been deleted. | ||
While politicians and people outside of China are allowed to freely dispute China's official numbers and news stories, the situation is very different for those living within the country. | ||
And new evidence is now emerging that officials in Wuhan deliberately downplayed the virus, even after formally notifying the World Health Organization on December 31st. | ||
Doctors and physicians from Wuhan have admitted that the government took a refrigerating strategy in the early days of the viral spread, banning medical personnel from speaking publicly or accepting media interviews in regards to the outbreak. | ||
An alleged Wuhan physician also wrote to the National Health Commission claiming that doctors in the city were told not to report viral pneumonia in their imaging reports between January 12th through 16th, a crucial period in which the virus began to spread. | ||
A tactic similar to the one they used to downplay the SARS outbreak back in 2003. | ||
This barring of information meant local health care workers were unable to properly raise the alarm on the severity of the situation. | ||
But it's not only the doctors who were being told not to speak. | ||
Chinese citizens are also being censored online and cannot even openly speak about the virus without using code words. | ||
The New York Times were the first to report that in an attempt to bypass censors on the Internet, Chinese citizens began using the words Chernobyl to describe the coronavirus and labeled Xi Jinping as Trump. | ||
Unfortunately, the Chinese government deciphered the code, and as reporter Josh Yee from the South China Morning Post points out, the hashtag Chernobyl was removed from discussion boards, stopping people from further discussing the outbreak in Wuhan and the government's handling of the crisis. | ||
Examples of other censorship include posts by families of infected people looking for help and folks in quarantined cities documenting their day-to-day lives. | ||
But deleting an online discussion is only the beginning of how China has been silencing its citizens. | ||
In early January, the country had arrested eight people in the city of Wuhan for allegedly publishing or forwarding false information on the Internet without verification. | ||
At least one of those arrested was a doctor who had reported the existence of the new virus. | ||
He later became infected and is now in critical condition. | ||
On January 25th, WeChat, a popular Chinese social media app, alerted its users that anyone who spreads information about the virus that the government deems a rumor or anyone who attempts to disrupt social order by posting information that doesn't come from state-run media would face between three to seven years in jail. | ||
The latest arrest was of a man who covertly filmed the true scale of the coronavirus outbreak from inside a medical facility in Wuhan. | ||
The footage shows what seems to be body bags piled on top of each other inside a van. | ||
The man seems to imply there are eight in total as he walks into the hospital ward. | ||
unidentified
|
There are so many dead people here, the man says. | |
To counteract criticism, state media have been publishing gushing reports on Beijing's response. | ||
Reports are also stating that government health workers in China are actively refusing to test likely cases of the coronavirus. | ||
The Epoch Times cited interviews with an unnamed insider and an independent journalist within Wuhan, both of whom said that Chinese doctors are not testing people who request it and that the Chinese authorities are limiting the supply of diagnostic testing kits. | ||
The insider shared that by controlling the number of available diagnosis kits, China's Center for Disease Control, or the CDC, is able to put an upper limit on the confirmed cases every day to maintain the appearance that the outbreak is under control, thus suppressing the official number of known cases of the disease. | ||
The true scale of the situation is not yet known and researchers at the University of Hong Kong have estimated that there could be up to 44,000 victims already. | ||
China has also allegedly been cremating coronavirus victims in secret. | ||
A verified Chinese media outlet covering the deadly coronavirus in the country has raised suspicion about the actual death toll of the illness after local doctors said they have been secretly cremating victims of the disease. | ||
And China is now saying that all victims of the virus should be quickly cremated and the government has banned funerals and what they are saying is an attempt to keep the virus from continuing to spread. | ||
The World Health Organization has also admitted to working with Google to ensure that their information regarding the virus is the top search on the internet. | ||
But let's remember, this is the same organization that is telling us to grant the Chinese government respect and defending a country that has been silencing and arresting citizens and downplaying this virus to the rest of the world. | ||
Many are speculating that the reason China has been so secretive is because the coronavirus is really a man-made bioweapon that was created in a lab. | ||
For a more in-depth discussion regarding this topic, go to Bands Off Video where you can find the latest reports by Alex Jones and Mike Adams tackling this important subject. | ||
As cases continue to grow by the thousands and experts warn of a global pandemic, the world will be watching China as this deadly virus continues to spread. | ||
This has been Savannah Hernandez for Action 7 News. | ||
Let's just pull back from this. | ||
Bill and Melinda Gates had a giant drill of 65 million people dying from a virus escaping in China three months ago. | ||
Then they fund and help develop a TV show for Netflix, a docu-series that countered We're good to go. | ||
At the end of the show, you learn that they've been there all along and had chosen to pick this maverick scientist to develop this wondrous, one-size-fits-all flu vaccine that everyone needs to take. | ||
And that bad people that won't take the vaccines, they're the problems. | ||
So we're all going to be taught the incredible fear of the coronavirus and cities locked down and checkpoints and all of this incredible information. | ||
And then we're taught that the saviors are the United Nations and Bill and Melinda Gates. | ||
We have had sources through the big food industry and through several major food suppliers that institutional groups, governmental groups, corporate groups are buying up all the food and that the food prices, raw food prices are skyrocketing. | ||
Well, that indeed is now happening and you're now seeing that in the news today and storable food is selling out everywhere. | ||
Most of the big storable food suppliers are already sold out because they sold out to big institutional groups. | ||
My Patriot that puts out InfoWars Select, that's their entire line of food, just an InfoWars sticker on it, still has food. | ||
They're still able to guarantee delivery within seven to nine days. | ||
Other people will tell you they can do that. | ||
I can tell you most of them won't, but that could change at any time. | ||
That means if you get your order in now, you will get it within seven to nine days. | ||
And they've got it fresh. | ||
They're packaging it right now as fast as it can go off the line. | ||
But if you wait, then it might be 10, 15, 20 days. | ||
We don't know because already a lot of storable foods being bought off the shelves here. | ||
The gas mask and the antiviral mask are selling out. | ||
And people are preparing. | ||
People are concerned. People know what's going on. | ||
Also, I personally have been taking vitamin D3 with vitamin K or winter sun because that's the main reason the body breaks down to viruses is a deficiency in vitamin D3 or vitamin K. And yes, I was already promoting this a month ago because it's wintertime. | ||
Before this even happened, we are selling out of our vitamin D3 that's organic and high I'm going to keep it at the discounted price, I guess, until it sells out because that's the right thing to do, but it's pretty scary that that's happening. | ||
And again, you go to infoworkstore.com, get the highest quality storable food, fresh, last 25 years in good, high quality plastic sealed containers with the then containers inside of that as well. | ||
Great for transport. This is all just a reminder with the economic crises and with the election looming and the globalists trying to cause a civil war and race war. | ||
That now it's more important than ever to have a get-out-of-dodge plan and to have storable foods and water filtration. | ||
And Infowars has been right on the front lines of getting people prepared. | ||
So whether it's the Alexa Pure water filtration system, that's still discounted despite the fact they're selling very fast. | ||
Those are probably going to sell out in a few weeks at Projections. | ||
The food, again, at MyPatriot, the private label's ours, they're selling out very, very quickly. | ||
We have the lowest prices you're going to find from My Patriot or any other distributors at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
In fact, we were way lower than all of them, but they called yesterday and said, look, our prices have gone way up. | ||
You're going to have to raise it up to at least this point. | ||
But InfoWarsStore.com has the lowest price you're going to find on the high-quality food from MyPatriotSupply.com, and the order just goes to them every hour, and then they ship it out right there, and then that also funds the InfoWars, which is a 360 win. | ||
But the big deal is that, according to the UN's own definition, the coronavirus is now a global pandemic, and obviously, it's synthetic. |