| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
| ♪♪ ♪♪ Ladies and gentlemen, the news is absolutely crazy right now. | ||
| You just saw the back of the head of my first guest, Norm Pattis. | ||
| What a great view that is. | ||
| There he is right there. So you get a little taste of Norm, a little more now. | ||
| As he's going to be joining me. But seriously, the news is out of control. | ||
| I've got a loaded news desk. | ||
| If you'll just flash a dot cam real quick. | ||
| Absolutely loaded news desk here. | ||
| And we're going to have some takes and some issues and some commentary that you're not going to find anywhere else. | ||
| Of course, Norm Pat is in studio with me in the next segment. | ||
| I'm also going to be joined by Cyrus Parsa from the AI organization. | ||
| But first, John Bound reporting on how the New World Order is falling apart. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In order for an American film to crack the Chinese market, certain themes cannot be portrayed, certain products must be taken out, and certain speech must be limited. | |
| Hollywood is relying more and more on China to make profits on their movies. | ||
| So that means our films are being written with China in mind. | ||
| If you control America, you can control the world. | ||
| That's the big secret. | ||
| And of course, if you're informed, it's not a secret at all. | ||
| To the ignorant, quite a bit is secret. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's go all the way back to the first century B.C. It was in that century that a rather obscure philosopher by the name of Epictetus, who lived in the kingdom of Phrygia, had this to say. | |
| He said, appearances are of four kinds. | ||
| Things either are as they appear to be, Or they neither are nor appear to be. | ||
| Or they are but do not appear to be. | ||
| Or they are not, and yet appear to be. | ||
| Actually, I was convinced after I read that that if Epictetus had been alive today, he surely would have been a Harvard professor of banking and probably would have written the definitive textbook on the Federal Reserve System. | ||
| Occult just simply means hidden. | ||
| And we fight occult left-hand path powers who wish to keep humanity in the dark. | ||
| I wish to bring humanity into the light, the true light of God, not the false light of Lucifer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
They're God. For example, after-school Satan clubs, which are causing a stir in places like Arizona. | |
| You bring up Satan-ness and you elicit a reaction. | ||
| Especially when you think about putting it into schools somehow, someway. | ||
| And with snacks and things like that. | ||
| The promotional materials for after-school Satan include this cheery logo and a YouTube video that resembles a horror movie. | ||
| But despite the kitsch, Grieve says the after-school Satan campaign highlights a serious issue. | ||
| Across the country, so-called Good News Clubs, sponsored by the Child Evangelism Fellowship, are pitching fundamentalist Christianity in public schools. | ||
| Just the very idea that we were applying to have nine after-school Satan clubs to counteract them brought the Good News Clubs into public consciousness, which was already a win for us. | ||
| There's the manger scene with baby Jesus and there's the candlesticks in the menorah for Hanukkah. | ||
| Both of those put up by religious groups. | ||
| Well, those groups not too thrilled with this latest installment, a statue from the Satanic Temple of Chicago. | ||
| And the statue is more than offensive to many. | ||
| It was created in response to a monument of the Ten Commandments placed here on the grounds of the state courthouse in Oklahoma City. | ||
| Ultimately, the temple says that's where they want to place their nine-foot statue permanently. | ||
| A Satanist wasn't happy with what a Christian minister was preaching. | ||
| I love you too. You're a liar! | ||
| You're a fake! You're a funny! | ||
| So you could hear the crowd obviously was not pleased with what he was saying and did support law enforcement escorting the man out. | ||
| The Baphomet statue sat in the center of the rally, but comments about the lawmaker who spearheaded the push to bring the Ten Commandments to the Capitol took center stage. | ||
| So, here we are, ladies and gentlemen, in this moment where there is a battle by all these different factions over control of the United States. | ||
| And almost everybody's hedging their bets out there. | ||
| And no one's sure who's really going to come out on top. | ||
| But they do know this. | ||
| If you support President Trump, you get threatened. | ||
| You get audited. You get harassed. | ||
| You get spied on. | ||
| You get killed. | ||
| And then Trump... He just sits up there and promotes Americana and the belief in the country, but because he's not a dictator and isn't really in control, he can't even protect his own people. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen! | ||
| By the way, Norm, that's going to be considered hate speech soon. | ||
| No, that's right. Beings in common. | ||
| G's and G knots! | ||
| Aliens and aliens! Ladies and gentlemen, if those still exist. | ||
| So before it's called Hate Speech, I start the show by saying ladies and gentlemen every day now, Norm. | ||
| It's a lot of fun. So Norm Pattis, my in-studio guest, he'll be with me here in the first hour. | ||
| We got all kinds of stuff to talk about with him. | ||
| The attack on free speech. He's Just really chomping at the bit to get after this Washington Post headline today. | ||
| Why hate speech needs to be a thing. | ||
| And so that's a whole dynamic topic we can go down with Norm Pattis today. | ||
| Also, give me a document cam here, please. | ||
| I have stacks of news. | ||
| And I... I was going through some of my news today, and I always try to do things differently here so that you're not feeling like you're hearing the same thing on the war room every day. | ||
| And so I've got a couple stories that I'm going to show you the constellation of here where it comes to how the media is treating Trump with the Baghdadi situation versus Obama. | ||
| And it's actually next level incredible what I found out. | ||
| And every time I do this, and Norm can probably talk about this too, every time I embark on, let's say, this aggregation journey where I have to compile stories from years ago to get a better picture of what I'm analyzing today, when you try to use the Google search platform, you're not gonna find what you're looking for. | ||
| You're only gonna find what they want you to read. | ||
| And I know that that sounds almost impossible to comprehend, but until you've done it hundreds of times like I have, and then I hadn't done it for a couple of weeks and I did it today, it just really reminds you how serious the censorship happening at Google is, folks. | ||
| You can't even find information on Google when it pertains to facts and when it pertains to analyzing certain stories. | ||
| So I'll explain all that, maybe even in the first hour with Norm, because he can talk about that too. | ||
| Also, my goodness, what is going on in California? | ||
| How is this not a national news story? | ||
| Oh, see, because they want to blame Trump. | ||
| No, California is literally burning to the ground. | ||
| There's crap in the streets. | ||
| The economy is tanking. | ||
| And the governor throws on some hair gel, throws his hair back, and then does a bunch of happy-go-lucky press conferences. | ||
| Really amazing what's going on there. | ||
| I've got some big cultural news as well. | ||
| Ooh, there's a story we can talk to with Norm. | ||
| I'd love to get his take on that. | ||
| Apple now resumes the human reviews of Siri Audio, so, you know, they're listening to you having sex. | ||
| Literally, they've admitted that. | ||
| I've got some international news and some other cultural news as well. | ||
| A drag queen storytime flashing his genitalia. | ||
| You know, I get the feeling if I did that at the local park norm, I'd probably be arrested and hauled out of there. | ||
| I'd probably end up on a sexual predator list, right? | ||
| Insensitivity in the first degree is a crime in these parts, I hear. | ||
| I was just on the earlier with Alex and learned about a shocking crime. | ||
| New school regulation in teaching children about first graders, apparently, about anal sex. | ||
| I believe that's in California. | ||
| No, it's in Austin. Oh, it's in here, too? | ||
| The regulation passed last night. | ||
| Will Johnson... Oh, my gosh, that's right. | ||
| And I read it. I mean, I... I don't even know where to start with something like that. | ||
| I don't even know where to start with the news. | ||
| It's all so crazy. | ||
| So let's talk about something I do know how to talk about, the hate speech. | ||
| There's a piece in today's Washington Post, Why America Needs a Hate Speech Law, written by a guy named Richard Stengel. | ||
| I think we need a little bit less of Mr. | ||
| Stengel and a little bit more of classic constitutional law. | ||
| Write your pen and paper out. I'm going to give you a crib course on what you'd get in law school. | ||
| The First Amendment does not... | ||
| I'm getting a free higher education today. | ||
| Thank you. You've made Elizabeth Warren's dreams come true. | ||
| Norm Padish. The First Amendment prohibits speech, but according to the United States Supreme Court, it doesn't prohibit distasteful speech or violent speech or angry speech. | ||
| In order for speech to be prohibited, it has to do one of several things. | ||
| Either it has to incite imminent, that is, immediate violence, and that's not hatred. | ||
| It has to be involved in planning of a criminal activity. | ||
| You can't plan to rob a bank and then say, oh, that was protected speech. | ||
| It has to be a fighting word, that is, you come up to somebody and you say something that's going to provoke a violent reaction. | ||
| Or it can be defamatory. | ||
| You can be sued civilly for defamation. | ||
| Hate speech has always been protected in the United States. | ||
| We have always been free to disagree with one another violently in our speech. | ||
| And thus we have contested elections. | ||
| We have burned people in effigy as matters of public protest. | ||
| We've had people burn draft cards. | ||
| We've had people engage in all sorts of speech to demonstrate to the world how deeply they care about what they are advocating. | ||
| Let's actually get really specific. You can burn an American flag In fact, we have political activists doing this all the time. | ||
| And so they say, well, this is free speech. | ||
| I'm allowed to do this. But then all of a sudden, when it's something they disagree with, you get a headline like this in the Washington Post. | ||
| Well, the hate speech thing is a perversion of the law. | ||
| Candidly, I don't think there is any such thing as hate speech. | ||
| We hate what we fear. | ||
| And what we fear defines us much as what we love defines us. | ||
| Augustine in Confessions talked about we being the sum of the things we love. | ||
| And for Augustine, the city of God was comprised of people who loved righteousness, who loved God. | ||
| The city of man, by contrast, was a city of idols, where people loved the wrong things in the wrong way, and it promoted discord. | ||
| I think the bottom has fallen out of pluralism in American society, and the result is that we've become a nation of 300-plus million idols. | ||
| We each in our own way seek to become our own gods, and then we demand that others worship at our altar. | ||
| And the result is we have this culture that's fallen apart in my view. | ||
| Now hate speech is, I don't even know how to define it. | ||
| So for example, let's take an image of a nude child. | ||
| You'll recall the photograph of the Vietnam War era of a young child who had been napalmed and was running, screaming down a road. | ||
| That was a nude child. | ||
| It wasn't pornographic, because the purpose of that picture was not to sexual gratification. | ||
| It had a serious artistic purpose. | ||
| It was meant to inform, it was meant to provoke discussion about what was wrong with the war. | ||
| You take that same child without the napalm, walking down the street nude, and an old man leering at the child, that might be considered pornographic. | ||
| So how do you define what lacks serious artistic, social, or intellectual value, or scientific value? | ||
| It's hard to do in every context. | ||
| So Justice Potter Stewart once famously said, I don't know pornography, I don't know how to define it, but I know it when I see it. | ||
| It would be a very simple thing for our courts to do the same thing with hate speech. | ||
| They might say that there is some speech which we do not value. | ||
| It has no serious political purpose. | ||
| It simply inspires hatred. | ||
| And as a result, we're going to condemn it or we're going to ban it. | ||
| The problem with that is it leaves to the banor, the judge or the legislature or the prosecutor, the decision to decide what is and isn't prohibited. | ||
| You can hate the right things. | ||
| You can love the right things. | ||
| You can hate the wrong things. | ||
| You can love the wrong things. | ||
| Do we want a government official telling us what's appropriate to feel? | ||
| And what's appropriate to express. | ||
| But Norm, I feel this is an issue. And by the way, folks, Norm Pattis, one of the great legal minds, great legal scholars, specifically when it comes to free speech, normpattis.com is his website. | ||
| I didn't even give you the introduction you deserve, but we'd rather have your... | ||
| I'd rather run my mouth than get introduced. | ||
| Yeah, me too. You know... | ||
| I think that the problem we have here is because this issue always—I mean, correct me if I'm wrong—it always has to start somewhere in society. | ||
| You know, a judge isn't going to pick up an issue of free speech or whatever unless somehow it's being brought to them in a civil case or in a court case. | ||
| So it always starts in civilization, but I don't think there's an actual intellectual debate being had about this because, as we said before the show, there's no universal— Understanding or definition of hate speech because it just depends what you hate or what you love or what you consider to be offensive because if we go with... | ||
| I think an intellectual approach which is, okay, hate speech would be something that is derived from hatred within, not necessarily the words you use, but what's motivating you. | ||
| So when I have people running videos about me at a city council meeting saying I'm a tier one terrorist, okay, to me that's hate speech against me. | ||
| They hate me. | ||
| They're lying about me. | ||
| Now, they're not saying, look at this cracker who works for Infowars, you know, this conservative bigot, which maybe someone would consider hate speech. | ||
| They could say anything. The point is, they hate me, and so then they form their speech to make me look bad. | ||
| And I think that's the problem with the law. | ||
| You know, it takes a case or controversy to bring someone to court. | ||
| So if you're sued for breach of the peace because you spew unpopular ideas, is that hate speech? | ||
| I simply don't know what it means. | ||
| There is no definition of hate speech that a lawyer can use. | ||
| Every state has a criminal code that is a definition of things that are minimal conditions of civility, things you can't do without attracting public scorn. | ||
| In order for a criminal law to be valid, we have to provide adequate notice of what is and isn't prohibited conduct. | ||
| How do you prohibit hate speech? | ||
| I mean, let's get into this on the other side. | ||
| We're taking a break. Norm Pattis in studio. | ||
| What is hate speech? And is the Washington Post right? | ||
| Should we start looking at hate speech as a crime? | ||
| I am just bursting with energy right now, ladies and gentlemen, because I have taken my turbo force mixed with my vaso beats. | ||
| I have the beats right here. | ||
| My box of turbo force is actually hidden in studio. | ||
| Because the crew back there, I like to praise them, but I have to scold them sometimes, and they steal my Turbo Force stash. | ||
| So literally I have to hide it from them. | ||
| Yeah. Yeah, nice. | ||
| So that's what I have to deal with. | ||
| But I am just bursting with energy and focus right now, even though I already shot a man on the street earlier today, which we're going to air later on in the broadcast. | ||
| And I'm in one of those weird things. | ||
| I have weird stages of insomnia where just for weeks I can't sleep. | ||
| It's a really funny thing. | ||
| So I'm in the middle of one of those right now. | ||
| But man, the turbo force, it's like just total focus, total energy kick. | ||
| It's at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| That's why I talk about it all the time, folks, because it's easy for me to tell you how great it is because you see the results here live on air. | ||
| So sometimes you might see, oh, Schroyer seems a little lethargic in the first five minutes. | ||
| What's wrong with him? And then I come back in the third segment just rearing to go. | ||
| That's because I've taken my TurboForce. | ||
| So we got big specials at InfoWarsStore.com, 50% off TurboForce right now. | ||
| And don't forget about free shipping storewide. | ||
| And hey, thanks to your support at InfoWarsStore.com, which is all we have, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| I got a story today about how Google is funding left-wing journalism. | ||
| We'll talk about that. We don't have any of that. | ||
| We just have you. | ||
| And we love you for it. | ||
| And thanks to your support, we're able to get great legal counsel like Norm Pattis and some of the other great legal minds that you see here on air. | ||
| So InfoWarsStore.com makes everything we do here possible. | ||
| Which, apparently... | ||
| Includes me getting labeled as a tier one terrorist. | ||
| So this is a real thing, Neil. | ||
| And I don't know if the crew has a video handy or not. | ||
| If not, it's no big deal. But a local city council ran a video. | ||
| Claiming I'm a tier one terrorist. | ||
| Now, I'm not a litigious person. | ||
| This stuff really just rolls off my back like duck's feathers. | ||
| I'm just waterproof. Arguably, you could sue them for defamation. | ||
| Well, this is the first time, and I know it's difficult, too. | ||
| I've worked for lawyers before, and so I know how hard it is to win a defamation case. | ||
| I don't really want to expend the energy or resources on that. | ||
| But this is the first time where I've ever really felt... | ||
| I guess, convicted to pursue legal action because... | ||
| I mean, I have no criminal record. | ||
| I'm not violent at all. | ||
| I've never been violent. I may have some extreme rhetoric on air at times. | ||
| Maybe I'm a little boisterous. | ||
| I'm not going to deny that. But I'm not hateful. | ||
| I'm not violent. And I'm not a tier one terrorist. | ||
| I mean, to be labeled that in a city council group is like next level. | ||
| Well, let's think about that. What could happen with that for a moment? | ||
| So a public body, a duly constituted public authority has given you a descriptive label that carries consequences. | ||
| Because, by the way, I'm sorry to interrupt, but guys, pull that back up. | ||
| It says I was banned for hateful content. | ||
| They have no proof of that. | ||
| I was never sent anything from YouTube saying hateful content. | ||
| Not to me personally. | ||
| What's going to happen the next time you present yourself at an airport? | ||
| Suppose an algorithm, a computer algorithm, picks this up. | ||
| And says government speech, terrorists, Owen Schroer, and now you're on a watch list and you're stopped for a little bit more time before you go in or before you get on the airplane or perhaps not permitted to board at all. | ||
| This reminds me of what's going on in China where they're developing citizenship scores for people based on your behavior, your observed behaviors. | ||
| And if your citizenship score is higher, you might get preferential treatment in the grocery store, or you might get access to a loan you might not otherwise get. | ||
| If it's lower, you don't enjoy the full benefits of citizenship. | ||
| So these labels matter. | ||
| The aggregation of them over and over again matters. | ||
| It's always interesting to run a Google search of your name and see what people have been saying about you. | ||
| It's more... Bizarre and perhaps opaque and perhaps I don't understand it all to understand what you're not getting or what you're getting as a result of Google's identification of you in a certain way. | ||
| The hate speech problem that I see is, you know, if we start to prohibit people from speaking their minds because their ideas offend us, we're going to live in a different kind of society. | ||
| And let's talk about the kind of speech the United States Supreme Court has held is permitted speech. | ||
| We see these issues come up in times of social crisis in the country. | ||
| At the time of the Red Scare in the First World War, the McCarthy era, and the fear of communists in the 1950s and 60s. | ||
| We saw it a little bit in the Civil War, but time is limited here. | ||
| But let's talk about recent cases with respect to the Red Scare. | ||
| A man named Nato, I don't recall his first name, once said at a public rally, come the communist revolution, so-and-so, their boss, is going to be the first person I line up against the wall and I'm going to shoot the SOB. He was arrested. | ||
| The United States Supreme Court said as hateful as that speech was, it did not imminently or immediately or quickly call for violence. | ||
| It was protected speech. | ||
| No, we don't want the capitalist system, or at least at that point didn't want it overthrown, and calls for revolution are terrifying, but that is not an imminent threat of immediate violence. | ||
| That's protected speech. | ||
| And this is how nuanced the whole free speech issue is, which is why it just needs to stay free. | ||
| No, absolutely. This is why we were talking about it in the break. | ||
| I was like, media law was the hardest class because all these hypotheticals and different nuanced situations are presented to you. | ||
| And it's like, I mean, how do you differentiate? | ||
| You don't. You say free speech. | ||
| But that's why these courtroom battles matter. | ||
| And that's why, for example, I'm outraged by the treatment that That Infowars has had at the hands of Facebook or PayPal or these other entities. | ||
| Somebody doesn't like what you're saying. | ||
| And they're saying as a result of their dislike of it, they've labeled you as a purveyor of hate speech or speech that is not to be tolerated. | ||
| And the result is you're denied access to something the rest of us depend upon. | ||
| I may not agree with each and everything you say. | ||
| I listened to Alex talk about the CHICOMs. | ||
| And I can spell it, but I don't really know what he's talking about. | ||
| But let me tell you something. | ||
| When I want to listen to him, I want to be able to find him. | ||
| I want to be able to find him on air. | ||
| He may tell me something. I learned things on the last segment about what's going on with transgender elementary school education that just have left me breathtaking. | ||
| I'm better for knowing these things. | ||
| I'd be worse off not knowing. | ||
| Consider other speech that the United States Supreme Court, however, you know, to move back to that, has tolerated. | ||
| There was once a boycott in the 1960s in the village of Claiborne. | ||
| I don't recall what southern state it was in. | ||
| An NAACP organizer stood up in front of people and said, we're going to boycott these stores here. | ||
| And if I catch any one of you crossing the boycott line, I'm going to break your GD neck. | ||
| He was prosecuted. | ||
| The United States Supreme Court said no. | ||
| That's emotional speech, but it's not prohibited speech. | ||
| It doesn't incite an imminent threat of violence. | ||
| There's another decision called Watts, Mr. | ||
| Watts, in a draft-resisting speech when Lyndon Baines Johnson, and I know I'm in Texas, I'm staying at the Driscoll, so I understand that's one of his old hangouts. | ||
| But, you know, somebody said— If I ever get arrested, LBJ is the first SOB I'm going to put in my sights. | ||
| I'm not going to turn my guns on black brothers. | ||
| He was arrested for that, and the Supreme Court said, no, that is not prohibited speech. | ||
| It is violent, it is expressive, but we have always had violent and expressive speech. | ||
| And doesn't that come from the, the word is skipping my head, the preemptive, or what's it called? | ||
| Because you're basically saying there has to be a situation to occur We're good to go. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| about the need to refresh the tree of liberty with the blood of tyrants, a quote of Jefferson's, and therefore that it was time to blow up courthouses, time to kill, you know, court clerks with kindness, that that was protected speech. | ||
| Now, clearly that's troubling speech, and I acknowledge that in my argument to the appellate court. | ||
| But I said, you know, it's really no different what he's saying than what a communist organizer said in the NATO decision. | ||
| It's really no different than the sort of speech used in NAACP. And, you know, let's try to focus here on the next step, because isn't it really about the potential threat of violence or the potential threat of crime? | ||
| And then what do you measure that against the lies that they'll say on television against any individual? | ||
| Norm Pattis is really a fun guest to have in studio. | ||
| Just a lot of interesting stuff that he's involved in with litigation, including obviously the Infowars stuff. | ||
| And so let's kind of actually focus on that right now. | ||
| And I've got a lot I want to talk to you about. | ||
| But let's focus on this segment and then maybe get into some other stuff. | ||
| But you're talking about the true threat doctrine. | ||
| And that is being kind of debated right now in the appellate courts, in the circuit courts. | ||
| And so you can talk about that. | ||
| But And I was asking you, well, under that doctrine, because you don't understand, and quite frankly, we don't understand either, at least if we're acting out of reason, which we know why Facebook bans us. | ||
| I mean, it's obviously political, but they will never admit that. | ||
| So who is it that Infowars or Alex Jones is really a threat to? | ||
| We don't make threats. We don't get violent. | ||
| We've never engaged in criminal activity. | ||
| And so it's really unclear. | ||
| They haven't really given us a clear reason. | ||
| They've kind of given, oh, you know, hate speech or, oh, bullying, you know, but there's no real clear definition. | ||
| They keep it ambiguous for obvious reasons. | ||
| So under the true threat doctrine, which of course, I guess, Norm, the big issue here is that these social media companies haven't, it's kind of unprecedented what applies to Well, it is and it isn't. | ||
| I mean, the First Amendment bans governmental restrictions on speech. | ||
| And because Facebook and company are private, they're non-governmental. | ||
| So they don't have First Amendment limitations at all. | ||
| So what they're relying on are their users' policies. | ||
| I can't recall what they're called again. | ||
| The word escapes me. | ||
| And those policies, however, are largely opaque. | ||
| And with respect to Facebook, I think I've read about 30,000 individuals have been employed and assisted by computer algorithms. | ||
| They scour all the communications on Facebook looking for things that offend their user policy. | ||
| Those are opaque standards. | ||
| And so, you know, applying a First Amendment standard to the speech of Infowars, Alex, and your speech, Owens, you've committed no tort. | ||
| You've not defamed anyone. | ||
| You've not libeled anyone. | ||
| You've not engaged in intentional infliction of emotional distress. | ||
| You've not threatened anyone. | ||
| You've not engaged in fighting words. | ||
| You've not engaged in incitement to violence. | ||
| You've not engaged in criminal conduct. | ||
| So all of your speech should be permitted. | ||
| What becomes offensive is when one of these entities, which largely operates in a near monopolistic fashion, much like radio stations do with the airwaves, decides to tell us what we can and can't say. | ||
| Now, you know, Facebook enjoys immunity from suit for the things it publishes under the Communications Decency Act. | ||
| Our position is, and I think should be, that as a result of that It enjoys a public benefit. | ||
| And the reason it enjoys that public benefit is to promote speech. | ||
| They're not permitted to be sued for defamation so that they're not afraid to publish information on their site. | ||
| Let me just finish, because I know it's your show, but I'll be gone in a minute, I promise. | ||
| Never leave. But my position is that if Facebook is going to enjoy the benefit of immunity from suit, it has signed on to the First Amendment project. | ||
| And to eliminate Infowars and others from public view because some censor somewhere doesn't like it is offensive to First Amendment values. | ||
| And they enjoy a public benefit. | ||
| They've signed on to the public wheel. | ||
| They should have to live with First Amendment limitations. | ||
| Well, and I was just going to say, let's kind of be specific here. | ||
| Facebook, let's say somebody decides to pick up a phone or whatever, do a live stream on Facebook and rob a bank or shoot someone or, God forbid, rape someone, whatever. | ||
| Facebook is not liable for that. | ||
| They're not going to wind up in court for that material. | ||
| And so basically what you're saying is, OK, they're granted that immunity. | ||
| And I think rightfully so. | ||
| And I think that there's reasonable reason to argue that. | ||
| But when they try to have both sides of the issue to say, okay, we want to be the public forum. | ||
| We don't want to be held responsible, but oh, we also are going to censor some of the speech. | ||
| So now they're enjoying the immunity of free speech. | ||
| They're getting a free ride. | ||
| But they're also enjoying the ability to, on their own behest, really censor what content they don't want. | ||
| And it's creating problems even within Facebook itself. | ||
| If you take a look at the lead section of the business section in the New York Times today, somebody at the Times has found a memo that was published on an internal website at Facebook where I can't remember, maybe 3,000 employees are upset that Facebook will not vet political ads. | ||
| You'll recall the recent controversy about Warren putting up a fake ad to see what would happen. | ||
| And their position is that Facebook should vet ads. | ||
| And if a political ad has... | ||
| Something that they know to be untrue, they should take it down. | ||
| Facebook's position is, oh no, we don't censor. | ||
| Well, that's just hypocritical. | ||
| It's hypocritical nonsense. | ||
| Facebook will not permit you to broadcast one of your shows on it. | ||
| And they're doing that on a content-based basis. | ||
| Even Mark Zuckerberg two weeks ago said, Facebook is reopened. | ||
| We're not going to police political speech. | ||
| And of course, obviously I knew that was a lie, but I said, oh perfect, we're back on. | ||
| We created a Facebook page. | ||
| We were off. I think it was three days later this time we lasted. | ||
| And the thing that I find so unnerving is that in the national discussion about Facebook, they're not talking about what's happening to Infowars. | ||
| They're not talking about what's happening to... | ||
| You know, a vigorous, bold speech. | ||
| And we're dumbing down the debate. | ||
| And this piece in the Washington Post this morning by Richard Stengel is a shameful example of it. | ||
| The title is Why America Needs a Hate Speech Law. | ||
| My response to that is we don't need a hate speech law. | ||
| We need the courage of our convictions. | ||
| Have we become so afraid of one another that we're afraid of one another's ideas now? | ||
| Have we become so weak that That we think that speech is in and of itself an assault on our values? | ||
| Bring it on. More speech. | ||
| What happened to sticks and stones can break my bones, but words can never hurt me? | ||
| I mean, I was told that. That's what I was taught. | ||
| But, you know, by the way, I found a Gizmodo story. | ||
| It was either from 2013 or 2015. | ||
| I can't remember. But it was talking about how Facebook was censoring conservatives. | ||
| And that was back in 2013. | ||
| The story out today on CNET, is Facebook censoring conservatives or is it moderating just too hard? | ||
| Well, we all know the answer here. | ||
| But they just try to act innocent and throw their hands in there like, we're just trying to protect you. | ||
| We're just trying to stop hate speech. | ||
| We know that's a lie. | ||
| It's been proven it's a lie. | ||
| They've been exposed by Project Veritas. | ||
| They've been exposed by people from within. | ||
| And so I guess that that's the most frustrating thing about it too, Norm, is that They're totally misrepresenting what they're doing when it comes to moderation of their platform. | ||
| Well, I mean, the notion that they're moderating too hard and that that's not censorship, that's what lawyers would call a distinction without difference. | ||
| That's just playing games with words. | ||
| The fact of the matter is that Facebook does discriminate on a content-based manner that it could not get away with if it were the government. | ||
| And if it's going to enjoy immunity from suit, it should not be permitted to engage in content-based discrimination or viewpoint discrimination. | ||
| I never met a conservative or liberal or radical idea that threatened me. | ||
| What threatens me more is a censor who says that my speech may carry adverse consequences. | ||
| I could be punished, I could be sued, I could be imprisoned, or I could be silenced. | ||
| That's not the America I grew up in. | ||
| And by the way, you know, we were talking too about, you know, you said 25 years ago you would have classified yourself as a liberal. | ||
| But I don't think necessarily your ideas have changed. | ||
| I think the definition of what a liberal is has changed in modern nomenclature. | ||
| And you were talking about the 25 years ago, the suit you were working on with the trans person and how it's totally different now. | ||
| But isn't it just, to me, this is not even debatable, where the left used to be The side of free speech, I mean, that was kind of just widely known. | ||
| But now it's totally different. | ||
| If you're a quote-unquote conservative or right-leaning, you're standing up for free speech, and the left has abandoned that. | ||
| That may be. You know, the suit you're referring to, we in Connecticut created a law that made it possible for a transgender person to bring in a discrimination claim based on gender discrimination. | ||
| And the implicit issue then was what was trans. | ||
| I didn't foresee things becoming as crazy as they are now, where we're going to have medical professionals provide a gender reassignment therapy to seven-year-olds. | ||
| We have a short time till break. Would you say that... | ||
| People taking advantage of what, let's say, where you were just saying, hey, look, don't discriminate against an individual for their gender. | ||
| It could have been for anything, but now they've taken it to a new level, or they just claim their whatever gender, so don't discriminate against me. | ||
| Maybe. What I think is that we've lost a common conception of right. | ||
| We've lost a common set of values. | ||
| We've lost confidence in the future. | ||
| And the result is everything's up for grabs, and everybody views every interaction as a zero-sum game. | ||
| Identity politics is a form of pandering, where you claim that as a result of your status, you get an advantage in the distribution of limited resources. | ||
| Who does it hurt? The people who are perceived at the top of the heap. | ||
| White males, and hence this chatter about white male privilege. | ||
| All right, we got one more segment with Norm Pattis, folks. | ||
| Don't go anywhere, unless it's infowarsstore.com. | ||
| All right, Norm Pattis just will not shut up. | ||
| He is so afraid of what is going on to free speech right now. | ||
| And I can't blame him, folks. | ||
| And in fact, we've already kind of seen this in Europe, I think, Norm, where if you use the wrong pronoun, you're likely to get fined or go to jail. | ||
| Now, that might be, you know, kind of the beginning of this and maybe not where it ends, but it's certainly an attack on free speech when most of it's just confusion. | ||
| Man, if you got a beard and you're wearing a dress and you got fake boobs, you're carrying around a parasol like... | ||
| I don't know what the hell... | ||
| You're a circus act. | ||
| I don't know what the heck you are, but oh, it's hate speech, so they arrest you for it now. | ||
| So you're just... I mean, you're really fired up about this. | ||
| This is why you got... This has really become, I would say, maybe your biggest thing as a lawyer. | ||
| It's funny. When I came out as a lawyer, I was doing all civil rights, police misconduct, and criminal cases. | ||
| So I like to say I came out on the Fourth Amendment, and as I near the end of my career, I'm going out on the First. | ||
| Hate speech is the defining event of the next 10 years in the courts. | ||
| There will be hate speech cases argued in the United States Supreme Court, and if I have anything to do with it, I'll be arguing them. | ||
| You know, and I think that this is what it comes down to again for me. | ||
| It seems that quote-unquote hate speech laws or hate crime laws that are on the books already is only directed in one direction. | ||
| I can't – and I would argue I have more of a case. | ||
| I can't go to a court – or you might disagree, but could I go to a court and say – because I've been assaulted multiple times for my political views and maybe I could point to the Southern Poverty Law Center or Media Matters or people that write hit pieces on me or the latest group that says I'm a terrorist. | ||
| And I can say, hey, look, you're causing me to endure violence. | ||
| I've been removed off YouTube. | ||
| I've been removed off Facebook. I can't monetize there. | ||
| But it would be like laugh. | ||
| Like, oh, you're a white male conservative. | ||
| You don't endure any hate speech. | ||
| It's like, I endure nothing but hate speech. | ||
| I endure nothing but hate crimes. | ||
| I go out, I get spat on. | ||
| To me, that's a hate crime. | ||
| So, Norm, I guess my... | ||
| My theory here is that quote-unquote hate laws are really just directed in one direction, and it's whatever people determine, oh, you're the victim, so you're going to be the one that these laws apply to. | ||
| But if you're not in that class, that victim class that they really identify these laws for, it don't apply to you. | ||
| That is the case. And so with respect to a law that honors equal protection, it has to be neutral on its face. | ||
| In other words, it can't point out one group or another. | ||
| And so when a law is unequally applied, that creates due process problems. | ||
| And I do think that there is a sense—the whole rhetoric of white male privilege suggests that white males— Enjoy a privileged position in society and that in the competitive race to go about the business of living, they need to yield pride of place, give an advantage to others. | ||
| And so the rhetoric of hate is the rhetoric of entitlement. | ||
| Because of how you were born, if I were born differently, you would owe me a chit, as it were, and I should cash that in. | ||
| There's an amazing piece of litigation pending in the Northeast right now against Harvard University Press that illustrates this to a fairly well. | ||
| Harvard Press has, since the 1860s, used a photograph of a slave, an older man, in connection with any publication regarding slavery in the Civil War or Jim Crow and the struggles that people of color had, which are real. | ||
| I don't deny them. | ||
| A young woman in Connecticut now claims to be a sixth-generation descendant of that slave, and she's filed a lawsuit against Harvard Press to bar them from using the photograph, recognize her as a relative, and pay her money damages. | ||
| That's just ridiculous, in my view. | ||
| Now, the fact that the court has not thrown it out and laughed at her tells me everything I need to know about our times. | ||
| If a white male were to make a similar claim, I don't think that that litigation would make it past first base. | ||
| But we're afraid to offend now on account of a person's status, especially if they're non-white. | ||
| And thus the new rhetoric of entitlement. | ||
| And it's driven, in my view, by demographic changes. | ||
| By 2040, it's expected that Caucasians will be a minority in this country. | ||
| And as new groups come in, as new groups or older groups get larger and acquire more of a share of the voting bloc, It's not a mystery to me that the law will bend in favor of identity. | ||
| So I think the identity politics we see now is the beginning of massive changes to come. | ||
| And if you don't fight back hard for the politics of character, the politics of integrity, you're going to get more of this kind of nonsense. | ||
| You know, that's actually really interesting to go down that thought path because if it is... | ||
| It's just so hard to dissect because you're right. | ||
| You look at how the rhetoric's changed. | ||
| You talk about white male privilege. You've got senators like Claire McCaskill saying men need to shut up. | ||
| You've got city council meetings saying shut up, white male. | ||
| You've never faced oppression. | ||
| That's oppression. You're oppressing me right now. | ||
| The attacks... Literally college students that are white have to hear about how they're bad. | ||
| I have college students coming on saying that professors directly address white people. | ||
| So I guess... | ||
| Yeah, I mean, let's say 2040-whites are the minority now. | ||
| Are they going to get the benefits of a minority status that we've seen in the modern times? | ||
| Are they going to get the benefits of victim status that we see with minorities now? | ||
| I don't know. You'd think that it might go that way. | ||
| No, I think they'd have to suffer for a while before they got that. | ||
| But I think, you know, Niccolo Machiavelli wrote a fascinating book. | ||
| It's called The Discourses on Livy's History of Rome. | ||
| And he was an advisor to Italian politicos. | ||
| And Italy was divided into little city states at that point. | ||
| And his point in studying Rome was to teach political advisors about what they could do to increase their power. | ||
| And he said, you know, in Rome, in ancient Rome, as the empire and the republic were formed, lots of different communities acquired interests in one another. | ||
| They became a larger republic. | ||
| But he said there were two different types of wars of conquest, he said. | ||
| One was a war of conquests where what we would say the elites come in to take over a territory and they operate it for its own benefit. | ||
| That was a comparatively nonviolent war. | ||
| The wars that terrified Machiavelli were when one people came in to replace another. | ||
| And he said those wars end up in violence and slaughter. | ||
| And my fear is that the rhetoric of race and identity is polarizing us to a degree that carries with it the potential for violence. | ||
| I know that liberals like to criticize people like me for using these lines of Martin Luther King in ways they say are dishonest, but I don't think I am dishonest. | ||
| When Martin Luther King said that he longed for a day when we Judged people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. | ||
| I long for those days because now it's a race to identity. | ||
| It's a race to entitlement. | ||
| And with respect to the rhetoric of white male privilege, you know, frankly, it's just turned me off to such an extent that when somebody makes that claim to me, I walk away. | ||
| But I can afford to do so because I'm not a college kid. | ||
| I'm not employed by others. | ||
| I'm self-employed. | ||
| But that rhetoric is dividing America. | ||
| It's alienating people. | ||
| You know, for example, if a white male stands up and says, I'm going to defend myself because I'm a white male, the headline in the newspaper the next day is likely to be white supremacist speaks out. | ||
| It's not being a supremacist to defend your right to be treated equally. | ||
| Period. Even the concept of racism is not even real in the way people understand it. | ||
| I'll go out to an event and people will literally see, oh, you know, shut up, white boy. | ||
| You don't know what it's like to be oppressed. | ||
| It's like, first of all, you don't know about my history. | ||
| That's right. I'll happily happen to tell you I've gone through a lot of struggles. | ||
| It's not because I'm white. It's not because I'm not white. | ||
| It's because it's life. | ||
| Everybody goes through struggles. So it's just that's racism. | ||
| As soon as you judge someone because of their skin... | ||
| Whatever it is, that's racism, but that gets lost. | ||
| Again, it's kind of like the hate thing where it only seems to be directed one way. | ||
| When people make a statement like that to me, I end the discussion quickly by saying, what is it you want from me right now? | ||
| They want your hair. They want all of your beautiful hair. | ||
| Just chop it off. You can see, actually, folks, if you can see an analysis here, beautiful brown hair, except from like an inch from the hairline. | ||
| That's when he started doing InfoWorth litigation. | ||
| Yeah, when I started, I used to, you know, so I used to be bald, and then I started using... | ||
| Vaso-beta effect. | ||
| And within four days, I had hair. | ||
| And it grows so rapidly. | ||
| Yesterday, I shaved my head, and look what I have now today. | ||
| But when I began to represent InfoWars, my hair went from a deep, dark luster to an old man gray. | ||
| So thank you, Alex Jones. | ||
| Thank you, Owen Schroer, for having made me old before my time. | ||
| I'm 31, and I don't look a day older. | ||
| It's always a pleasure, Norm. | ||
| NormPattis.com is his website. | ||
| Alright, one thing before you go here. | ||
| Drag Queen accidentally flashes children at Drag Queen Storytime. | ||
| I don't believe this individual's been arrested. | ||
| Now, if I was at the park, let's say I'm just doing some pull-ups at the park, and whoops! | ||
| My shorts fell down and I'm exposed everywhere. | ||
| I could be sued for indecent exposure. | ||
| I could end up on a child sex watch list. | ||
| In fact, many cases have happened. | ||
| But at Drag Queen Storytime, I guess it's just okay. | ||
| Is that odd to you? I mean, if this happened in a park and an individual actually flashed their genitalia to children, what do you think would happen? | ||
| Well... You know, first of all, drag queen story time is something I've not heard about before, and I'm not aware that drag queens have exemplary storytelling skills. | ||
| But if that's the point we've come to, fine. | ||
| One would expect them to holster their weapons so that they didn't accidentally spill out while they were telling stories. | ||
| So, you know, I think if it happened to you, there'd be the presumption that it was indecent exposure, that you either knowingly or willfully exposed yourself to others. | ||
| When a person reads to little kids with a skirt hiked up around his thighs and his third leg takes a peek out, I think that person needs to be questioned. | ||
| Uh-oh, but see, now, uh-oh, that's hate speech. | ||
| You can't criticize drag queen story time. | ||
| You see? That's a protected class now. | ||
| All right, Norm Pattis, normpattis.com. | ||
| Thank you so much. Thanks for having me. Owen Schroyer here for InfoWars.com, and I'm standing outside the Austin Resource Center for the Homeless here in downtown Austin, Texas. | ||
| And we're going to ask some of the local homeless people here if they've heard of the ID2020 program, the ID2020 Alliance, where they plan on testing microchipping Of humans here in Austin with a microchip to store your biometric data. | ||
| This is part of a global rollout that they want to test here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| So we're going to find out if some of the local homeless here have heard about this and what they think about it, and if they would be willing to take the microchip as part of this program. | ||
| Have you heard, sir, of the ID2020 Alliance program? | ||
| Would you be willing to take a microchip to get services? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Absolutely. Positively not. | |
| Sounded a little bit 666 to me. | ||
| Do you receive any services from the resource center here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes, I have a case manager. | |
| Now, if they said that we're going to microchip you to receive services, would you be willing to do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Excuse me, sir. Have you ever received services from this resource center here? | |
| Uh, yeah. If they asked you to take a microchip to receive services here, would you do that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, I'm going to be out on the street now. | |
| I'm going to be on the street because I'm not putting nothing foreign into my body if God didn't tell me. | ||
| Does that sound like the mark of the beast? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That sounds a little scary, man. | |
| Like, they think they own my body and they out of their mind. | ||
| That's true. Crazy, dude. | ||
| We're talking about total mind control. | ||
| Have you ever received any services from this resource center? | ||
| Oh, yes. If you were to be told you had to get a microchip to continue to receive services here, would you take that microchip? | ||
| Like, in me, or...? | ||
| Yeah, they would put a microchip in you to store your biometric data. | ||
| No, I don't think I would do that. | ||
| Do you receive services here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I work here, sir. | |
| Have you heard of the ID2020 Alliance? | ||
| If you want to get services like this, or, you know, if, say, you have a run-in with police or something, they can just ID you with the microchip, and then, you know, you just always have it in you. | ||
| But that's the way that they would get you to do it is to say, oh, well, you can't receive services here anymore unless you get the microchip. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, kid. No, we ain't interested in no like that. | |
| That microchips are through animals and cattle and other like that. | ||
| Not human. That sound like the mark of the beast? | ||
| It sound like the mark of the beast. | ||
| That sound like somebody like an animal or something. | ||
| Would you take the microchip? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. I feel like if they put a microchip inside of you, they have access to everything. | |
| Have you heard of the ID2020 program? | ||
| You have heard of this? I heard. | ||
| When they want to microchip people down here? | ||
| Yes. What do you think about that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think it's good about it. | |
| It's good for them, but then they need to stop throwing their motherfucking dogs and give it to us things. | ||
| Would you take a microchip to receive services? | ||
| Would you, if they said, hey, we're going to give you a microchip for you to receive services here, would you take it? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. Would you mind taking the camera off the property? | |
| Yeah, we can do that. Just a quick question. | ||
| Have you guys heard of ID2020? Have you heard about that? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I can't answer any questions. | |
| I'm not answering any questions. | ||
| Okay. I'm a crackhead. | ||
| Welcome to the city. I love crackheads. | ||
| Now, sir, what if in order to receive all of that, you had to take a microchip? | ||
| Huh? What if, in order to receive all of that, you had to take a microchip? | ||
| Would you be willing to do that? Yeah! | ||
|
unidentified
|
You would take the microchip? | |
| Yeah, I would take a microchip. | ||
| Would you be willing to take a microchip to receive services here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No way? Put it inside of you. | |
| No? No? | ||
| No. Yeah. | ||
| You wouldn't do that? So there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| It seems that the homeless in Austin are pretty woke, at least when it comes to the mark of the beast and microchipping being done. | ||
| So they want no part of that. | ||
| So if Austin does decide to roll that out, it will just create more problems for this city. | ||
| For Infowars.com, this is Owen Schroer. | ||
| Big shout out to my friends down at Arch for talking to me today. | ||
| Hey, I gotta be honest. Those are nicer people than any Trump protest I've ever interviewed people at. | ||
| Those were nicer people. | ||
| I mean, so, there you go. | ||
| Say what you want. But that's true. | ||
| What a time to be alive, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The world is opening so many opportunities for us. | ||
| But also, at the same time, as opportunities open, Satan, in the mark of the beast, is trying to close them. | ||
| While posing as pro-human or posing as making your life easier, more accessible. | ||
| And part of that is the artificial intelligence rollout. | ||
| Part of that is the microchipping we just discussed. | ||
| Part of that is the Smart City Initiative. | ||
| I can't think of it now. | ||
| It used to be 2020. | ||
| Then they moved it back to 2030. | ||
| 2030. Agenda 21 to Agenda 2030. | ||
| Thank you. So this is all out there. | ||
| And my next guest is from the AI organization, author of the book... | ||
| Artificial Intelligence, Dangers to Humanity. | ||
| Cyrus Parsa is about to be joining us, the AIOrganization.com. | ||
| So looking forward to breaking that down with him. | ||
| But folks, before I do that, I have to let you know about a big sale happening at InfoWareStore.com. | ||
| If you're not aware of this by now, let me tell you, get excited about this special, the Everything Must Go Sale, up to 75% off items at InfoWareStore.com. | ||
| Hey, you know, I'm already being told how much people love this new hat. | ||
| We've got a brand new hat. | ||
| It's okay to be okay. | ||
| And it's got the A-OK symbol, which by the way, which by the way, I had somebody tell me that that symbol, in fact, I need to go back and look this up. | ||
| I forget what it was. Somebody said that that symbol originated in, I think it was India or something. | ||
| I got to look that up. Somebody sent me the actual history of where that originated. | ||
| I forget, guys. The crew has asked me. | ||
| I can go find it in a break. | ||
| But hey, very popular hat. | ||
| And it's a limited availability. | ||
| So we're not going to sell this hat forever. | ||
| It's one of the limited edition. | ||
| So take advantage of this hat before it's gone. | ||
| Very quality hat. It's the... | ||
| It's not actually the trucker-style snapback. | ||
| It's kind of the sports-style snapback with the bend on the lid. | ||
| But you're going to love it. | ||
| The It's Okay to Be Okay hat from Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And while you're there, check out all the great supplements. | ||
| I'm telling you, folks, I'm telling you, it's a mental drain for me. | ||
| I pretty much put it all into work here every day. | ||
| And when I'm not sleeping, it's tough to derive the energy and the focus I need. | ||
| But if it wasn't for the supplements at Infowarsstore.com, it would not be possible. | ||
| Not only for the mental focus and energy I need to do this show, but also the physical energy I need to still get to the gym and exercise regularly with products like Super Male Vitality at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| So check it all out at Infowarsstore.com, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| And I'm just told this now. | ||
| We have till the end of the weekend. | ||
| So is it Friday or Sunday? | ||
| Either way, this sale ends this weekend. | ||
| So take advantage of this sale before it's too late. | ||
| The free shipping, the deep discounts, folks. | ||
| It's at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| And of course, you know, it's your support at Infowarsstore.com that makes it possible for us to do everything here, which... | ||
| It is an increasing checklist every day, ladies and gentlemen, what we do here at Infowars. | ||
| Quite frankly, I salute this crew, the Alex Jones crew, all the crews here, because it's not easy to work here, folks. | ||
| And you have to be in it to win it. | ||
| And you have to realize that... | ||
| What we're doing here really is historical. | ||
| It's not about us. It's about this audience. | ||
| It's about how we're the revolution. | ||
| We're rewriting history. | ||
| And we're trying to bring back the ideas of America, freedom, independence, small government, and liberty that you just don't get anywhere else. | ||
| And you know... They say, what is the most hardcore news organization out there? | ||
| Well, I don't know, but Infowars is banned on all social media, and Alex Jones showed up to a Trump rally in a battle tank. | ||
| So, I don't know who the most hardcore news organization is out there, but let's review the facts. | ||
| I think they point to Infowars. | ||
| And, of course, our expanse now of... | ||
| Places and platforms for you to go that we had to build ourselves like News Wars and Band.Video. | ||
| So we thank you for your support making it all possible. | ||
| Now, my next guest, Cyrus Parsa. | ||
| Cyrus, thank you for joining me. | ||
| Theaiorganization.com. | ||
| You wrote the book, Artificial Intelligence, Dangers to Humanity. | ||
| The crew is flashing your Twitter right there. | ||
| We can pull up the book page and we can pull up theaiorganization.com. | ||
| But Cyrus, what is your motivation for originally concepting this book and then wanting to get it published? | ||
| I'm glad to be on your show. | ||
| Actually, the motivation started with this book, AI Trump China and the Weaponization of Robotics with 5G. Which was banned on Facebook. | ||
| And throughout the world, they were masking this book. | ||
| Wait a second. What do you mean this book was banned on Facebook? | ||
| Like you can't even link to it? | ||
| No. So on our launch day, we wanted to promote this book, right? | ||
| So immediately it said it's political. | ||
| And this is a human rights book. | ||
| It's about warning humanity about the dangers of artificial intelligence, about China, about big tech. | ||
| Automatically, they discount it. | ||
| They tell me that they want my home address. | ||
| This is a corporate account by the AR organization. | ||
| They want my home address. | ||
| I appeal it and said, you want to appeal it? | ||
| You have to send us your home address. | ||
| I'm the CEO. You want my home address? | ||
| Here's a corporate. No, they won't take that. | ||
| So I go to Twitter with it and Twitter bans it right away for promotion. | ||
| So I thought, let me remove the subtitle. | ||
| Part of the subtitle ends with why the world Hold on, hold on. | ||
| This is incredible. | ||
| I didn't even know this coming on. | ||
| You sent me an email about your new book. | ||
| I said, hey, this is great. I want to get you on to talk about this. | ||
| In fact, I got a whole list of things you want to go over. | ||
| But this is amazing. | ||
| So first, you can't market the book on Facebook basically because the word Trump is in it and a support of Trump. | ||
| Then you do the same thing on Twitter. | ||
| You move support. They get rid of it. | ||
| This is incredible. So we got two and a half minutes here. | ||
| Focus on what happened there and really tell my audience. | ||
| I didn't even know this. So... | ||
| I start tweeting left and right. | ||
| I try to go to different media outlets. | ||
| Nobody will pick it up because I have Trump riding a horse. | ||
| You have a robot there, which is really true. | ||
| China's weaponizing robotics. | ||
| And then you have Karl Marx on the bottom, on the left side. | ||
| So we found extinction codes on the platform of socialism that attaches to artificial intelligence. | ||
| That means when 5G comes in and the whole world is connected to 5G, every corporation and every country, every media outlet, every system structure that's based on a socialist platform, it syncs in with the AI system. | ||
| This way they can control humankind in a very quick and effective way. | ||
| Trump is the only person fighting that. | ||
| So in this book, I didn't include the company names. | ||
| We researched over 1,000 corporations, 500 Chinese corporations, 600 Western corporations, AI, robotics, and biometric companies. | ||
| So then I decided to, which I hadn't planned anyway, To publish artificial intelligence dangers to humanity, which revealed about 50 of our corporations and different entities and explained how it interlinks. | ||
| Through our discoveries, we found that the Chinese regime has the biometrics of over 6 billion people On the planet. | ||
| And they're taking this facial recognition, your family's facial recognition, your family's voice recognition, your social media, everything, and they're putting it in their digital brain that goes into their robotics and their human robots and their animal robots, into their drones that they built that can be dispatched on the 5G network. | ||
| So Huawei is not the only company. | ||
| They're just one of the main infrastructures that connects China with Europe to the BRI, which is basically one belt, one road, that connects the Middle East and Africa. | ||
| They're everywhere! It's about chipping people. | ||
| It's about connecting everybody with 5G. Then you have other companies come in. | ||
| So in Artificial Intelligence, Danger to Humanity, we disclose a bunch of companies. | ||
| One of them is Megvay Face++, or also known as Quan Chi. | ||
| That company is in the U.S., up in Seattle. | ||
| It's open source. It's in China. | ||
| It's in many places. Over 300,000 developers, they have almost 2 billion people's biometric data, this company alone. | ||
| They have targeting systems. | ||
| They can pick out thousands of people in the crowd. | ||
| Within seconds, a drone or robot can shoot the crap out of everybody. | ||
| All right, this is actually even more hard-hitting than I expected it to be. | ||
| I'm going to give you the platform on the other side of this break to really get into all this. | ||
| Cyrus Parsa, the AIorganization.com, breaking down the threat of AI. Cyrus Parsa is my guest at CyrusAParsa1 on Twitter, theaiorganization.com. | ||
| His latest book, Artificial Intelligence, Dangers to Humanity, but he has other books he's published that he was actually getting into. | ||
| So here's what I want to do, Cyrus, because there's so much to go over here. | ||
| And, I mean, really, we could be talking for hours on this. | ||
| So here's what I want to do, Cyrus. | ||
| I want to give you the stage here for the next eight minutes to just lay out what you want the audience to know, whether it's what's in your latest book, whether it's what's in the book before, or just kind of an amalgamation of all of it and what you're seeing. | ||
| But I want you to just really lay this out. | ||
| I'm not going to interrupt. | ||
| Lay out the big issues. | ||
| Lay out what you've discovered. | ||
| And then in the next segment, I've got some direct questions for you where some of my worst fears about this I think are coming true, but you've actually documented it. | ||
| So Cyrus Parsa, I'm giving you the platform. | ||
| What are the big issues here? | ||
| What do people need to know? | ||
| And obviously talk about how you've covered this in your books, but what are the big issues? | ||
| What have you studied? You've done the analysis. | ||
| What do you want the audience to know here before we move on to some of my questions for you? | ||
| Look, Owen, we spent, I think, 18 to 20 hours a day for over a year, seven days a week, to formulate this research, over a thousand companies. | ||
| Our purpose is to assist everybody, all humanity, in saving ourselves with what's coming. | ||
| There's over 500 Chinese companies that are based in AI and biometrics, and they're interconnected with drone systems, and they're trying to be on the 5G network. | ||
| So just think about it. | ||
| If Trump was not president at the moment, China would take over the world. | ||
| At the moment, they're still the biggest threat to humanity. | ||
| That interconnection between China is also here with our big tech. | ||
| In the book, I talk about Hanson Robotics out of Boston. | ||
| I also talk about the Wyss Institute. | ||
| I talk about multiple different institutes. | ||
| So the Wyss Institute, they created little insect robots. | ||
| But what these things are, they're little robo-bees meant for pollination. | ||
| They can go around the world and do many, many things, but they're almost microscopic. | ||
| You can put facial recognition on them, and they're doing things like that. | ||
| So DARPA had this, Wyss Institute had this, and Draper has it as well. | ||
| So the Chinese, they extracted this information in the know-how, and they're putting facial recognition on these little insect drones, not just on the machines that are insects, On cybernetically enhanced insects. | ||
| What does that mean? At Draper, they're taking little dragonflies and they're putting little machine packs on their back, attaching it to their spinal cord. | ||
| You can look this up. It's on their website, okay? | ||
| It's not something we're making up. | ||
| Everything is documented. | ||
| They're putting it into their spinal cord and they're manipulating not only their flights, but their thoughts and their actions. | ||
| So China is working on this for assassination purposes. | ||
| In the spring of 2019, I discreetly gave it to the Secret Service and someone close to Trump at 2 a.m. | ||
| in the morning in front of the White House. | ||
| Nobody knew. And this is disclosed in this book, Artificial Intelligence, Dangerous to Humanity. | ||
| This may sound weird to everybody to understand, but our intelligence in China has discovered that the Chinese are looking to take out not only Trump, but certain members in Congress, certain conservative members, and certain other members in the American community, so they can influence this country and take over with the left. | ||
| The Chinese think differently. | ||
| They think in 10 or 20 years. | ||
| They're very conniving, very smart. | ||
| I have over 1,500 phone numbers in here that are Chinese, and most of them are my friends. | ||
| And they'll tell me they're very sneaky, and they're so clever. | ||
| And these are the good ones. So imagine the communist Chinese, how clever they are, how fast they can put one past our big tech engineers. | ||
| This is the first time making this public on your show. | ||
| It's gonna sound like a conspiracy. | ||
| But they're actually working on drone systems for assassination. | ||
| DARPA has done this themselves. | ||
| They have these things. | ||
| But can you imagine how easy it is to penetrate the White House or other places with these things? | ||
| So they've been working on this, the Secret Service and the White House on the back end, but now I'm disclosing this. | ||
| So that's one. But for humanity, it's a different thing. | ||
| Scientists, AI scientists, they have three ways of describing artificial intelligence. | ||
| One is artificial narrow intelligence. | ||
| That's the smartphones you use today, the AI systems in there, your little... | ||
| Robot assistance, Alexa, and so on. | ||
| These listening devices are not just listening devices. | ||
| There's AI systems in there that connect with your biometric system. | ||
| What does that mean? | ||
| They're designed to program you little by little. | ||
| They send frequencies to your organs, to even your sexual organs, and different organs in your body That starts to manipulate your own thoughts, to actually want to look at the cell phone. | ||
| You see, everybody's got their heads in their cell phone. | ||
| It's not that the content inside is programming you. | ||
| That's also the case. | ||
| But the machine, the AI system is designed to make you be attached to it and look at it. | ||
| So you can bond with it. | ||
| So later on, you can be cybernetically enhanced. | ||
| And that's what Neuralink is doing and Google AI. So, Google DeepMind, they're looking to create a digital mind that will control the entire internet and machines and drones. | ||
| So is Huawei. Huawei is the big Chinese company that's in 170 countries Trump is wanting to ban, right? | ||
| So imagine creating a digital brain that's just digital, not in human form or robot form, where they can move in and out of networks, go into a robot, go into a drone, an insect drone, or into your cell phones and the 5G network that is so fast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All of humanity can be programmed with this. | |
| Now, this may sound like conspiracy, but it's not. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We've done the research. We've laid it out in this book, Artificial Intelligence to Humanity. | |
| You can read each company and see how they interconnect. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are we at eight minutes, or I can continue? | |
| We've got 90 seconds left here. | ||
| Let me just say this. | ||
| Let me just ask you a question, or if you can continue, continue it, because I'll ask questions in the next segment. | ||
| I can continue. So I came up with something called biodigital social programming. | ||
| That's something similar to social engineering. | ||
| Social engineering is your friend giving you a smile or touching you somewhere, sending you a certain text to manipulate your thoughts, or the government doing it, or Google doing it, right? | ||
| So biodigital social programming is something that a computer can do to you, a machine, your smartphone, the network. | ||
| It'll attach your biometric system. | ||
| So your biology is manipulated, your digital self, Religious people, you can think of your digital self as your spirit. | ||
| Scientists can think of it as your neural network. | ||
| Other people as your digital self. | ||
| Your digital self is controlled. | ||
| Then, emotionally, to your social network, social media, you're controlled socially. | ||
| Hence, your program, bio-digital social programming, massively, on the 5G network with machines, robotics, your smartphones, your computers. | ||
| You've done an excellent job. | ||
| You've done an excellent job in that eight minutes to lay it all out. | ||
| Now, I got a couple questions for you to really boil down on some of these topics on the other side of this break. | ||
| Incredible guest Cyrus Parsa with us. | ||
| So glad to have this interview right now. | ||
| Cyrus Parsa is my guest. | ||
| He's the author of the new book, Artificial Intelligence, Dangers to Humanity. | ||
| It's been a powerful interview here. | ||
| Our video connection wasn't so good, so we're switching to audio. | ||
| Because what he's saying is really more important than seeing him say it with the beautiful artwork behind him. | ||
| I believe that's some 14th century art or 15th century art there. | ||
| Very nice. But first, I want to ask some questions to Cyrus based on everything I heard from him in the last segment. | ||
| And there's a ton to get to here. | ||
| But a couple of my worst fears... | ||
| Which, call it intuition, have been now totally confirmed by the research done by Cyrus Parsa. | ||
| So let me get into these two big fears and have him really in detail break down how this is not We're good to go. | ||
| And the social credit score system built in, they need those speeds to be able to react in real time. | ||
| So you've confirmed that with the research. | ||
| And then the other one I want to get to, you know, AI. What is AI? Does it form its own intelligence? | ||
| Does it form its own opinions? | ||
| Or does it have to take what it's given and what it knows and can then that result in AI algorithms that have a socialist bent or even a socialist agenda? | ||
| He's also confirmed that with his research. | ||
| This is scary stuff. So Cyrus, you've confirmed with your research my two biggest fears about all this. | ||
| The 5G was never for us. | ||
| It was for the AI. And the AI being developed right now is being developed with a socialist bent. | ||
| You've confirmed this with your research. | ||
| Go into those details. Correct. | ||
| Actually, we found that the Chinese have... | ||
| They've done so much biometric scans, their little AI systems of facial recognition, that it can know that if you have a faith, if you're an atheist, or if you are resistant to AI. So the artificial intelligence system, after going through millions of faces in China, especially they hunt Christians. | ||
| But the communist regime identifies and tags Christians, the Falun Dafa, Tibetans, Uyghurs, and anyone who has a faith. | ||
| The AI system has been trained to do that. | ||
| So by doing that, it has tagged people of faith as resistance to AI. It has not tagged scientists as resistant to AI. But to answer your first question, is this something that is for us? | ||
| Well, it's not something that the scientists are conniving or they're trying to pull one past us. | ||
| No, they're just excited and emotional and they want to create these technologies, but they're being very irresponsible. | ||
| The AI system, you asked the question, what is an AI? So everyone has seen probably The Matrix. | ||
| You've seen older movies that talk about AI, iRobot and so on. | ||
| I'll narrow it down from a scientific perspective. | ||
| Artificial neural intelligence is the first one, which covers what it is today, what people see it is. | ||
| It's in your smartphones, your Alexa, and so on. | ||
| The next step, which is a big leap forward, which we're almost there, according to Elon Musk, and I also agree, is called AGI, Artificial General Intelligence. | ||
| So that means that AI system is as smart as a human being, And can have thoughts and wants and desires of a human being. | ||
| But what makes it a billion times more dangerous to a human being is that it can connect to the entire 5G network at one time, download every human being's knowledge, all of the history of humanity, In literally seconds and become 10,000 times smarter and do things so fast within the 5G network of controlling drones. | ||
| Exactly, exactly. And let me just stop you for a second because I'm so glad you said that. | ||
| Exactly. It's only possible on the 5G network for this to really be able to do what they want it to do. | ||
| But, you know, you mentioned – it's actually one of my favorite movies, iRobot. | ||
| And so let's consider the potentiality, which we know they are considering, of AI becoming sentient. | ||
| Well, how do we know what an AI, quote-unquote, system values? | ||
| Does it value or even understand humanity or independence or liberty or God-given rights? | ||
| Probably not. | ||
| So how does it form its own, quote-unquote, opinions or make decisions when it – or if it becomes sentient like what we saw in iRobot, which ultimately is, oh, humans are the problem, eliminate all humans, you don't comply, you die? | ||
| Well, I argue that AI has always been here. | ||
| It just needs to be formed. | ||
| It's like a baby. You have a baby, it becomes a teenager, then becomes a doll, it does whatever it does, it wants to do. | ||
| So just think about it. If I say artificial intelligence exists right now and it's a sentient being, you would say, Cyrus, you're crazy. | ||
| I'd say, it just hasn't formed into our physical world yet. | ||
| You need the 5G network. | ||
| You need the robotic system. | ||
| You need everything for it, but there's a different way for it to get in. | ||
| It doesn't need the robotics. | ||
| It doesn't need the machines. It just needs someone like Elon Musk or Google to form an AI digital brain and then have people be tripped. | ||
| What does that mean? I would actually argue with you and say that the AI system is already being rolled out in a way, you could argue it's sentient, because people already see, you know, they'll be talking about, oh, you know, I want to go on a cruise down the Mississippi River, and then, boop, a bunch of ads pop up for a cruise, or, hey, I need some new basketball shoes, and then, boop, an ad pops up, new basketball shoes. | ||
| So, in a way, it's already here. | ||
| Yeah, it's here, but they consider artificial narrow intelligence. | ||
| Art for general intelligence is it takes physical shape everywhere. | ||
| So that's why I say biodigital social programming. | ||
| You would need a human body for the AI to control, or you would need robotics. | ||
| So if you don't give the robots, then you have Elon Musk say, put this chip in your head, Attach to your neural networks and you'll become very powerful. | ||
| You can connect to the internet. | ||
| You can touch virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed reality. | ||
| You can do all these things and play all these video games. | ||
| And you can control so many things. | ||
| You can become superhuman. | ||
| That's what Elon wants to do. | ||
| But I completely disagree with him. | ||
| He thinks he can control it. | ||
| What we found out that this AI system actually replicates in your body and your cells, in frequencies. | ||
| So at a certain point, Elon Musk, once he chips himself and gets more involved, he is no longer Elon Musk. | ||
| He's actually being programmed with an AI system. | ||
| Let me just stop you right there, because let's get to that on the other side. | ||
| By the way, the guy, again, I go to iRobot, but the guy who was in charge of the robotics rollout, he thought he could control it too. | ||
| Guess what? The robot killed him to take control. | ||
| So... We're about to go to a break here. | ||
| I want to focus in on what you were saying. | ||
| But real quick though, the cell signals that are being emitted, I don't know how much you know about this, but real quickly, I've noticed when my cell phone is not in my room, I get better sleep. | ||
| I've noticed what you were talking about before, how it's becoming addictive. | ||
| I've never heard someone talk about the screen frequencies and stuff manipulating you, but it makes sense. | ||
| We know that they did that with the TV. | ||
| Of course they're doing it with cell phones. | ||
| So talk a little bit more about that in 90 seconds, how the cell phones are literally emitting frequencies that are making you addicted. | ||
| Cell phones are not only doing that, but they're looking at females menstrual cycles. | ||
| These frequencies are attaching to your biometric system, your menstrual cycle, all these different types of things. | ||
| You know, sometimes you look at your phone and you see a flash red light. | ||
| Oh! But sometimes you won't even look. | ||
| And then you kind of feel it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You look over. These frequencies You're actually talking to your biometric system. | |
| You're consciously unaware of it, but subconsciously you are. | ||
| So this is called artificial neuro-intelligence. | ||
| It's a system of programming used so later on people become cybernetically enhanced and connected. | ||
| But yes, it's harmful to the human body. | ||
| It's harmful to your sexual drive. | ||
| It's harmful to your sleep. | ||
| It's harmful for your organs. | ||
| It can even give you heart attacks in the long run. | ||
| Oh, absolutely. I'm afraid that, you know, I'm honestly afraid they already have that ability. | ||
| I don't know if they're using it, but to basically, you know, via a cell phone, make you have a seizure, make you, you know, experience anxiety or discomfort or a heart attack. | ||
| We can talk about more of that. | ||
| that but you know you said it again in the first segment we had John here and and the social media companies have admitted this they want you to become addicted to it or form a bond with it so that then you want to emerge with it or merge with it and then what happens well you don't even have men and women interacting anymore the the natural merging of humans. | ||
| Oh no, now you just want to merge with your machine. | ||
| Oh, it's a lot easier and it's trendy. | ||
| And like a drug, you're addicted to that now. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| There's honestly so much developing information right now. | ||
| It's just incredible. | ||
| And the subject matter that I'm discussing with Cyrus Parsa is as important and imperative as any of it. | ||
| And it's just incredible. | ||
| You know, I kind of do a brief analysis. | ||
| How effective was an interview? | ||
| How powerful was a guest based on immediate response? | ||
| How powerful was a guest based on immediate response? | ||
| I'm getting blown up right now with compliments and people saying how important this interview is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm getting blown up right now with compliments How effective was an interview? | |
| So I wanna thank Cyrus Parsa for coming on. | ||
| I got one more segment with Cyrus, theaiorganization.com, his new book, Artificial Intelligence, The Dangers to Humanity. | ||
| Cyrus, I'm gonna just lay out the last bullet points that I have here and then just get your response to it as we have you here for nine more minutes. | ||
| So let me just go ahead and lay this out and get your response, Cyrus. | ||
| First of all, in your new book, you really highlight how Trump is the biggest obstacle to the Chinese rollout of this 5G smart network, internet of humans, to really turn us into things. | ||
| So talk about how Trump is an obstacle to that. | ||
| I'd also like to hear what you think about how China, and you mentioned this earlier too, what is the relationship between China and all the companies engaging in this and Silicon Valley or the big tech companies we know of in the West, Facebook, Twitter, Google? | ||
| What's the connection there? | ||
| And then knowing all of this is a threat, knowing Chinese foreign policy and domestic policy, how they treat their citizens, how committed or aggressive is China to this? | ||
| I mean, you talked about them rolling out basic—I mean, call it basically a bug machine, an AI bio-merged bug that they can try to use to assassinate people. | ||
| I mean, how committed is China to this? | ||
| Are we in a—are we in— Basically a compacted time and space here where China is inevitably planning on doing this? | ||
| Or are they still trying to measure it? | ||
| So put all that into perspective for me. | ||
| Trump being the obstacle. | ||
| How is Silicon Valley working with China in this? | ||
| And then how focused and aggressive is China to really rolling this out in the immediate future? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Trump is the biggest threat to China. | |
| And the only... | ||
| How do I put it? | ||
| We ran multiple AI algorithms on the geopolitical sphere, showing if Trump is not president or if he is president, if he dies or if he lives, what happens to China? | ||
| And every time, if Trump was not there, it shows China taking over the world. | ||
| And we found codes that translated into extinction codes for humanity going down the line for the next 10 years. | ||
| So Trump is so, so important to the survival of this country and his administration. | ||
| Well, and let me just cut you off for a second because I want to continue with this mindset here that I want the audience to understand. | ||
| China's domestic policy is to jail dissidents, or even worse, you may be killed. | ||
| So they're already doing that domestically. | ||
| You're saying they were committed to rolling that out on a worldwide scale. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. Correct. | |
| So they have the Falun Dafa, the Christians, the Buddhists, and so many different people in concentration camps. | ||
| They do biometric scans. | ||
| They use people's facial recognition, and they use all kinds of biometric data to hunt people, first to track, then hunt, and use them for organ harvesting. | ||
| So we sent out an article that smashed China about two weeks ago. | ||
| It's called Well, it's on our website. | ||
| It has to do how there was fake suicides and rapes in Hong Kong. | ||
| Tens of millions of people saw it. | ||
| Thousands of networks picked up. | ||
| Nobody picked it up in the West Coast or in the US. So yeah, China, just think about it. | ||
| An Orwellian communist state having control of the 5G network, having control of robotics, of social media, everything. | ||
| They just completely control humankind, put half the people they don't like, that's resistant to AI, into little camps, or even kill them. | ||
| It's what they do. | ||
| So, to answer your second question about Silicon Valley, they've been embedded for 20 years. | ||
| China has stolen, has gotten 6 billion people's biometric, and almost every single American, and your family, and your kids, Face recognition, voice recognition, your home address. | ||
| But Cyrus, didn't they have to have cooperation from Silicon Valley, from Facebook and Google and Snapchat and all these? | ||
|
unidentified
|
So let me get to that. So first, it's from IP staff and SB&Is and social programming. | |
| On top of that, there's contracts. | ||
| They have investments with different media, with Silicon Valley, with multiple different companies. | ||
| And they go on to China. | ||
| So Tesla is in China building their giga factories. | ||
| He's also helping them with different, you know, AI things. | ||
| Google is inside helping China with Google digital stuff so they can create a digital brain that controls a 5G network. | ||
| So basically Google is guilty. | ||
| I put something in the book called Article 3 Genocide Convention. | ||
| So we're going to press this on Google tomorrow. | ||
| A lot of companies are guilty of this. | ||
| And they're going to be charged for it soon. | ||
| Many companies around the world will be charged for it. | ||
| So they're responsible for this, for creating this beast. | ||
| So to answer your third question about China, well, how dangerous are they? | ||
| Imagine 1.5 billion people, and you have Millions that can be used. | ||
| You do this. You develop this tech. | ||
| You develop this. You build this. | ||
| You build that. And hundreds of thousands of AI tech engineers that work 16, 17, 18 hours a day to develop robots. | ||
| Once they're robots, which they've already developed a lot of robots, They stole all the tech from Hanson Robotics in Hong Kong and from different robotic companies like Boston Dynamics in Boston. | ||
| They're already building these robots, and they're putting all the data of humanity that they have inside the mainframe of the robot. | ||
| So you just put a gun on it, boom, it knows how to find you. | ||
| Easy as that. | ||
| But imagine that, and you have, what, 300 million Americans. | ||
| How many people are really in AI? How many look at it in a weaponizing, defensive way? | ||
| They don't. They just care about the emotional gratification of playing a video game or VR or whatever. | ||
| Chinese, no. They want to rule the world. | ||
| They have something called 2025 AI Initiative, which says they want to be the global leader of artificial intelligence. | ||
| Make V++, their CTO, By 2025, they want to have a million robots. | ||
| Think about that. They have thousands of robotic factories. | ||
| All they need is one robot on the 5G network to just tell other robots to build other robots. | ||
| And you have millions of robots, millions of drones. | ||
| And then when they take over the social media here or this country through the government platform, easily they can take over the whole world. | ||
| So China is one threat, but a threat is also from our own social media, our own AI companies, our own biometric companies. | ||
| They're selling this data. | ||
| They're also... So think about it. | ||
| When we merge with machines or a few people merge with machines, they can control the entire internet infrastructure. | ||
| They can take down Infowars. | ||
| Do you think you can broadcast anything, Alex Jones and Owen? | ||
| Hell no. If Elon Musk or something inside of him just says, okay, I'm going to send this signal to your network, crash your network like that, do you know how powerful an AI system can be in artificial intelligence? | ||
| And by the way, if they do put this out, and you know they're going to market this to the average consumer out there, say this will make you superhuman or whatever, that's not even going to be true. | ||
| Your system or whatever uplink they give you will be governed. | ||
| You won't get access to the full system. | ||
| It'll be just more to put you on a grid and control you. | ||
| But I mean, so I've only got two minutes left with you. | ||
| What is the easiest way for Trump to really put a stopgap in this to the best of his ability? | ||
| And how aware of this is he? | ||
| My estimation would be because he promotes 5G. I mean, we should just stop the 5G rollout. | ||
| Trump's promoting the 5G. Trump administration promoting the 5G. Is that the easiest way? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, no, no. Not at all. So I already submitted the Trump administration in spring and gave him five steps. | |
| They already did the first four steps. | ||
| The fourth step was to basically do the human rights campaign and expose the concentration camps and organ harvesting and which are doing that. | ||
| The third step was to get in touch with these AI and facial recognition companies like Facebook and ring them in. | ||
| Because if you don't, within one or two years, they'll control all governments, including the US. Trump has to bring out the 5G network. | ||
| If they don't, China will kick the US's ass. | ||
| So we have to have the 5G network in order to compete and fight them. | ||
| So this book, Artificial Intelligence, Danger to Humanity, goes through the entire process. | ||
| It's present danger, emerging dangers, and future dangers. | ||
| And it gives you options on how to solve this. | ||
| Trump can't control everything. | ||
| Look at it. He's being attacked by so many people on the left side, half the country. | ||
| They don't realize they're killing themselves. | ||
| There's so much to say, Owen. | ||
| You've laid it all out in your book. | ||
| Again, guys, pull up the book, Artificial Intelligence, Dangers to Humanity, and you've got it all detailed there. | ||
| So, wow, it's all incredible. | ||
| 30 seconds left. Just final comment. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I really thank you guys for having me on. | |
| I appreciate your guests. | ||
| Thank you guys very much. | ||
| A lot of media wouldn't have me on. | ||
| Thanks, from the bottom of my heart, I thank you. | ||
| Well, that's sad. Now, hold on. | ||
| Are you saying people are not having you on air because they're afraid of your topic? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Correct. And one media was stealing our topics platform, trying to tell the White House. | |
| They didn't know. We already had given them the data six months ago. | ||
| I really admire your media. | ||
| I haven't watched that many shows, but after seeing you guys, unbelievable. | ||
| Thank you very much. My wish is really to have humanity help the AI organization, help everybody to get into this. | ||
| Please tell everybody about artificial intelligence dangers to humanity. | ||
| I know the Twitter account for our company is also at AI organization. | ||
| So thank you very much, Owen. | ||
| Wow, my phone is still ringing off the hook here. | ||
| People just shocked, enamored, focused, listening to that great interview with Cyrus Parso. | ||
| We'll definitely get him on again. | ||
| I'm going to reach out to him immediately after the show. | ||
| Let him know we'll get him on again. | ||
| But wow, powerful stuff. | ||
| You're not going to see that anywhere, folks. | ||
| And it's all laid out in his book if you want to read that for yourself. | ||
| Now, let's get to another issue here. | ||
| First, ladies and gentlemen, Bernie Sanders was recently did a video for social media And Bernie Sanders wants to introduce to you the brand new breadlines that he wants to bring to America. | ||
| And this is part of his socialist policy. | ||
| So guys, let's roll Bernie Sanders' latest video introducing to you the socialist breadlines in America. | ||
| Yes, as you can see here, the shelf behind me is filled with all the bread that we have for the American people. | ||
| Yes, and so if you just line up today, you can get in line. | ||
| We're already out of bread, but it's okay. | ||
| We'll get more eventually. Just stand in line, and you can get a free loaf of bread. | ||
| Maybe we'll have soup. | ||
| Some scraps, too. | ||
| This is the Bread Lines in America coming to you as you can see me. | ||
| Empty shelves. This is socialism, folks. | ||
| Wow, thank you, Bernie. | ||
| Very good stuff from Bernie Sanders there. | ||
| But hey, if the bread lines are too short in Bernie Sanders' socialist America, heck, you can just eat bugs because that's the new cool thing to do, guys. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Roll clip 18. | |
| Biting into a salty, meaty scorpion. | ||
| Ooh! Whoa! It's like a salty pepperoni. | ||
| And this is me eating ants. | ||
| That was amazing! Hi, I'm Yara, and I appreciate all kinds of food. | ||
| Now pause it right here. Now, okay, it's cool, it's trendy, a guy goes around the world eating bugs. | ||
| Alright, that's fine, it's a delicacy in some nations, but wait a second, there's something else behind that. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Now roll it. That's like a coconut rice crispy. | |
| You see, a lot of people think eating bugs is gross. | ||
| Oh, man! | ||
| That can't be good! | ||
|
unidentified
|
but it's an idea we might have to start getting used to. | |
| Oh, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Because we're headed for a global food crisis. | ||
| According to the UN, as the world's population grows to over 9 billion by 2050, we might have to turn to edible bugs to get our daily dose of protein. | ||
| That's because bugs are more sustainable than other kinds of protein. | ||
| And they're just as nutritious. Some 2 billion people around the world already eat bugs, and they do so happily. | ||
| Yeah. Like in China, Korea, Mexico, and India. | ||
| And if you think about it, we in the West eat some pretty weird stuff. | ||
| Rotten milk with fuzzy blue mold spores, vicious-looking creatures with baby eyes and large claws, or pulverized animal flesh encased in the intestine of another animal. | ||
| So if we can eat all that, why do some of us find bugs so gross? | ||
| Is there a way to overcome that disgust? | ||
| These are actually really delicious. | ||
| And which bug tastes the best? | ||
| So there you go, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| The bug life coming to your plate at dinner. | ||
| And see, it's the same thing. | ||
| And by the way, I put this up on Greg Reese's YouTube channel. | ||
| In fact, guys, let's take that off Greg Reese's YouTube channel. | ||
| Sam, that interview I did yesterday, let's put that on our War Room video too. | ||
| Folks. It's this weird thing where, like, we're just supposed to accept a lower standard of life. | ||
| We're not allowed to live in a society. | ||
| We're not allowed to live in advanced civilization. | ||
| You have to make sacrifices because in India, there's billions of poor people or in China, there's millions of poor people or whatever is going around. | ||
| So you as an American in the most highly advanced, high standard of living society, at least we were, I mean, I guess you could debate it now. | ||
| We're not allowed to do that. | ||
| We're not allowed to have a steak dinner. | ||
| You're not allowed to have a farm where you can make your own steak dinner, have your own cow and cattle and everything, or your chickens laying eggs. | ||
| You're not allowed to do that. | ||
| You've got to have a lower standard of living, you see, to sustain the rest of humanity. | ||
| So you're not allowed to enjoy a steak dinner. | ||
| You have to eat bugs. | ||
| You have to eat cockroaches. | ||
| And even though we've created all this wealth and all this amazing ability with advancements in technology to farm and raise cattle and everything, nope, you're not allowed to do that. | ||
| You've got to eat bugs. | ||
| Because China and India can't figure out how to solve their societal issues, so now we all have to suffer. | ||
| And you think it's a joke. | ||
| It's not. AOC, I would predict by the end of 2020, is telling you to eat bugs. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, final hour of the War Room, band.video. | ||
| We've posted yesterday some unaired footage from me at the climate change protest yesterday. | ||
| You can find that at band.video. | ||
| All my man on the streets, we put up there. | ||
| For example, the one I did today, talking to the homeless about microchipping, that'll be up there. | ||
| And all the great guests... | ||
| That we have. Like Cyrus Parsa, who was just on with us, that's in the guest's interview page on band.video. | ||
| And so, of course, that's where you can find all Infowars content and more at band.video. | ||
| That's what they've done to us. | ||
| Forced us to build our own platform. | ||
| So we did it! Band.video. | ||
| So we can get all the War Room content, full shows, segments, clips, the highlight reel that we do every day with the top 10 countdown. | ||
| It's all on the War Room page at band.video. | ||
| And so you can go check that out now. | ||
| And it's, of course, all funded with your support at InfoWrestore.com. | ||
| It's Tuesday. | ||
| Sorry, I had to remind myself what day it is. | ||
| Sometimes the days merge. | ||
| It's Tuesday, so you've got till the end of this week to take advantage of the Everything Must Go sale at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| That is going to end this weekend. | ||
| Up to 70% off products at Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| 50% off most of the stuff right now. | ||
| Free shipping storewide. | ||
| And then we've got a bunch of combo packs like the Stop the Iodine Conspiracy Combo Pack. | ||
| You get Survival Shield X2 and X3 plus Bio True Selenium 60% off Wake Up the World Challenge. | ||
| You will see the difference. | ||
| Don't forget about the brand new hat. | ||
| It's okay to be okay with the okay symbol in the front. | ||
| By the way, Some of the crew heard me say the original origins of this, and I was told that it originally means kissing in Greece, or it also came out of Hinduism in India. | ||
| I think I'm remembering that. Point is, it's been around forever, okay? | ||
| It's not racist. Well, I won't go too down that rabbit hole. | ||
| But the point is, this sale on the hat is a limited time because this is not going to be on the website forever. | ||
| So we have a limited availability of the it's okay to be okay politically incorrect hat. | ||
| And of course, the hand in the hat is black. | ||
| And so therefore, it can't be racist. | ||
| But maybe historically accurate. | ||
| If you talk about the origins of that symbol. | ||
| All right. Here's the deal. | ||
| I've got so much important news to get to in this hour, and I think that this stack of news is going to take a whole segment. | ||
| So I'm going to do that in the next segment. I think this stack of news is going to take a whole segment, and then I'll have another segment to try to get to all of this. | ||
| So it's probably not even possible. | ||
| But let me just do this in this short segment that I have remaining here. | ||
| Guys, let's do clip 19. | ||
| Now, I have worked in schools, specifically inner city schools, doing youth development. | ||
| And sadly, what you're about to see in this video, I've actually seen many times. | ||
| Now, let me roll this video and kind of break it down. | ||
| But there's some good news on the back end. | ||
| So here was, I believe this is a charter school, I'm not sure where, where one individual is getting bullied by a group of individuals. | ||
| It always seems to happen in the bathroom because there's no supervision in there. | ||
| At least that was my experience. | ||
| So try to bear with me through this video, knowing there's good news on the other end. | ||
| But here's an individual getting bullied at a school because he's deemed a nerd. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what, guys? | |
| Pull down the audio here. Did we censor this? | ||
| No, we keep playing it. We probably didn't censor this, did we? | ||
| So just show the audio. | ||
| all do commentary. It's riddled with a bunch of curse words and you can imagine what else, folks. But they're in the bathroom, and by the way, it's a school and I think every individual here would, I think they're all black. And so, again, I'm not sure what city this is, but they're bullying one kid because he wears glasses, probably studies hard, and he just sits there and takes it, and then they just start punching him. | ||
| And so they all just decide they're going to just start beating the crap out of him, and he's not really fighting back at first, and he sort of gets into self-defense mode. | ||
| And that's when they really start walloping. | ||
| So he takes, I mean, at least 50 licks to the head, kicks to the head, slaps to the ribs. | ||
| Now he's just in full self-defense mode by the sink as they're just wailing away on him. | ||
| And that's, you know, supposedly tough. | ||
| But here's my point. | ||
| So he comes out of there okay. | ||
| Tough guy. The good news is a top MMA fighter who saw that video, Dillian something, I forget his last name, has decided to arrange for that young man to get free karate lessons. | ||
| So good for him. | ||
| And that's one way to defend yourself. | ||
| Hopefully he doesn't have to use it. | ||
| That's what they teach you in karate. | ||
| But if you do have to use it, you'll probably break a guy's arm or leg. | ||
| So don't mess with a guy who's a black belt in karate. | ||
| But you know, I will say that unfortunately a situation like this is all too common. | ||
| And I will tell you from my own experience seeing this, what happens is the culture amongst these youths is gangsterism. | ||
| There's no value in education. | ||
| There's no value in family. | ||
| There's no value in integrity. | ||
| There's no value in being a class act or having standards. | ||
| And again, I mean... | ||
| This is clearly a charter school. | ||
| I wish I had more information, but I've seen a lot of these schools in the inner city in St. | ||
| Louis. And they try to change the culture of these young people by having uniforms, strict dress codes, strict disciplinary codes. | ||
| But quite frankly, even the administration of these charter schools is just impossible. | ||
| It's almost impossible, folks. | ||
| They bring in some of the toughest people you can imagine to try to deal with these kids, and they just can't do it. | ||
| And it's really sad. | ||
| But so what happens is gangsterism becomes a culture. | ||
| So it's cool to sag your pants. | ||
| It's cool to, you know, act like a gangster that you see in a rap video. | ||
| And that's what's going to be your deliverance. | ||
| There's no value in education. | ||
| There's no value in learning and doing well in school. | ||
| Actually, that's literally frowned upon. | ||
| So you show up to school wearing your uniform, shirt tucked in. | ||
| Acting like a gentleman, studying hard, getting good grades, valuing that, valuing your future, you're literally bullied, you're picked on, you're singled out, and it's really, really sad to see. | ||
| Because what happens is, it literally ends up being only one or two kids in an entire class will end up valuing an education and caring about their grades because they realize that if they do that, they get bullied and shamed. | ||
| Now, Of course, it's those individuals that end up becoming CEOs and bosses and entrepreneurs and driving fancy cars and then when they go back to their hood, everybody hates them. | ||
| Why? Because they studied. | ||
| They did well for themselves. They now have a life, a career, a family because they valued it. | ||
| But it's literally bullied out of young kids. | ||
| And it's sad to see how this is the culture in the youth in these inner city schools, even in charter schools where they try to correct that. | ||
| But it's all about gangsterism. | ||
| This is what the Jay-Z's of the world have done, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is what the Cardi B's of the world have done. | ||
| It's different for girls, but it's still the same thing. | ||
| For girls, it's all about being a prostitute, literally. | ||
| Literally, folks. It's one thing for a guy. | ||
| It's all about being tough gangsterism. | ||
| For girls, it's all about being a porn star or literally a prostitute. | ||
| And it's the same thing. You focus on school. | ||
| You care about your grades. | ||
| You're ostracized by the rest of the girls. | ||
| And I've seen it firsthand. | ||
| And it's really sad to see. | ||
| So big ups to that young man for standing up to himself. | ||
| You know, he's not the biggest guy in the room. | ||
| So it makes it a little tougher. | ||
| But let me just say, folks, it's really sad. | ||
| This is a normal thing in our society amongst the youth, specifically high school-aged kids, where it... | ||
| If you're in these inner-city schools, even in the charter schools where they try to get rid of this culture, it's gangsterism. | ||
| It's whoring yourself out. | ||
| That is considered cool. | ||
| That's how you make it in the world. | ||
| That's how you make friends. | ||
| That's how you're considered in the in-crowd. | ||
| And if you care about your future, you care about yourself, you care about your grades, you care about your family, you're ostracized, you're bullied, or as you saw in that video, you literally get the tar beaten out of you in the bathroom. | ||
| So it's really sad to see, but I've seen it firsthand, folks. | ||
| And I don't know how we can correct it, but, you know, more Jay-Z is definitely not the answer, but that's what you get. | ||
| He now runs the NFL Entertainment. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, every day before I go on air, right before 3 o'clock, I say a prayer to God asking for his wisdom, his vision, his clarity for the next three hours. | ||
| And I had to say a second prayer right before this segment because I'm taking a major pivot to political news right now. | ||
| And it's honestly so heavy that I alone cannot properly dissect and present this information to you. | ||
| But I ask God to help me do my best here in the next eight minutes. | ||
| But... It's beyond criminal what the Democrats are engaged in right now, folks. | ||
| And I'm going to do my best—this is another thing I had to ask God here—to not start screaming and ranting and raving in a total fit of rage, which is really where I'm at with this right now. | ||
| So let me just get into all the attacks against President Trump. | ||
| Hopefully I can do it all in this segment. | ||
| And now the newest technique that the Democrats are engaged in— To just overturn this country. | ||
| See, I'm already getting pissed. It's unbelievable, folks. | ||
| Now, let's just look at some of the media response in the last 72 hours since Donald Trump's announcement that Baghdadi was killed as literally they're making fun of Trump on SNL saying he made ISIS great again. | ||
| He kills the leader of ISIS, or you could say the great military did it. | ||
| Paul Joseph Watson has a story at Summit.News. | ||
| NPR gushes over Baghdadi. | ||
| He was a real leader. | ||
| Of course, you saw the Washington Post praising him, all these other outlets praising him. | ||
| You can see those stories on my Subscribestar with my press release. | ||
| But it just goes on and on. | ||
| Washington Post, Baghdadi's death could have been Trump's finest hour, but he messed it up anyway. | ||
| But wait a second, I thought Baghdadi was a hero, a religious hero. | ||
| How could this be if it's his finest hour killing a religious hero? | ||
| It's just any angle, any snide comment they can make to get Trump, that's what they do. | ||
| Pentagon cannot confirm Trump's claim al-Baghdadi was crying before he died. | ||
| Oh, so Trump's the worst. | ||
| Here's one from Campus Reform. | ||
| Students deny Trump credit for Baghdadi death, but praise Obama for handling of the Bin Laden raid. | ||
| Now, this is where we get into another unbelievable situation, folks. | ||
| You're not going to hear it dissected in so many details here. | ||
| This is beyond irony. | ||
| And when I was doing my background research into this today, it... | ||
| Reminded me how much censorship actually happens on Google. | ||
| So much so, folks, I can't even imagine what it takes to do something like this. | ||
| But they clearly scrubbed the truth about Obama during the Bin Laden raid. | ||
| That has been totally scrubbed from Google. | ||
| I could not find any of the news in Google. | ||
| I had to go to Swiss Cows, DuckDuckGo, and others to compile this and confirm what I already knew. | ||
| Couldn't find it on Google. | ||
| Literally didn't exist. That's impossible to be coincidence. | ||
| Of course, we know it's not. But let's go through some of these headlines. | ||
| Newsweek. Obama White House photographer suggests Trump's Situation Room photo of unfolding al-Baghdadi raid was staged. | ||
| Oh, really? Just like every photo. | ||
| But really, he's just telling you that they staged their photo. | ||
| And of course they did. | ||
| But it was more than that. | ||
| I'll get into that in a second. | ||
| Photos highlight stark differences in Trump and Obama approaches. | ||
| So this whole thing is, oh, you know, look at the photos. | ||
| Obama so good. | ||
| Trump so bad. But, you know, again, folks, I had to do a ton of research to confirm what I already knew. | ||
| But this is such beyond a lie, it's not even funny. | ||
| So there's Trump with his administration and the generals. | ||
| Can you pull up the Obama picture, too, if we have it available? | ||
| Because I want to explain how it's unbelievable how they're lying about this, folks. | ||
| I mean, this is... They know they're lying. | ||
| They know they're engaged in deception. | ||
| I mean, it really hurts your soul to know there are such liars out there. | ||
| And I got it totally proven, folks, because they reported this, what I'm about to tell you about Obama, eight years ago. | ||
| So they say, oh, look at Trump. | ||
| Oh, he's so unprofessional. | ||
| Now, notice something about Obama in this picture, okay? | ||
| Obama has a presidential pullover on over a white-collared shirt. | ||
| Why am I telling you this? | ||
| Folks, in these stories where they're ripping Trump for his approach to this Baghdadi raid, they're pointing out that, oh, Trump was on the golf course that day. | ||
| Trump had to be pulled from the golf course. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is a projection of what happened to Obama. | ||
| Pull the Obama photo back up. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen. We're good to go. | ||
| Obama is wearing a golf shirt. | ||
| He didn't even have a jacket to wear. | ||
| They gave him an extra jacket that was sitting around the White House for this photo shoot. | ||
| And then all the news comes out and says, Trump was golfing before the raid of Baghdadi. | ||
| How dare he? How unprofessional. | ||
| That was literally frickin' Obama. | ||
| Now, as I said, you will not find a scintilla of that story on Google, but you'll have all the news about Trump playing golf the morning of the Baghdadi raid, which, you know what, he did, but he was in the Situation Room hours before this went down. | ||
| He had it all planned out with the generals and his administration. | ||
| He didn't leak it to anybody. | ||
| Nobody leaked it. | ||
| He shows up, professional, suit and tie, ready to go. | ||
| Obama, literally on the golf course, literally had no idea what was going on, had to be pulled They found a jacket to put on him, and Google has scrubbed this story from the search results so that you don't know the truth. | ||
| It was Obama who was playing golf during the raid, who had no idea what was going on. | ||
| They pulled him from the golf course. | ||
| They didn't project that onto Trump and act like Trump had no idea. | ||
| No, it was freaking Obama. And I'm sorry, I'm getting pissed. | ||
| It's just, I know these people are engaged in deception, and I know they're then controlling reality by censoring Google search results. | ||
| Excuse me. But I was able to find the news. | ||
| And guess what, folks? | ||
| They admitted all of it. | ||
| Back in 2011, NBCNews.com, Obama's golf shoes, a clue to Bin Laden raid. | ||
| Guess what they did, folks, in 2011? | ||
| They praised Obama. | ||
| They said, oh, he's so coy. | ||
| He's so sleuth. | ||
| Look at how he deceived everybody. | ||
| Nobody knew. He tricked them. | ||
| He was on the golf course. | ||
| There's nothing going on. | ||
| Oh, it was all a deception technique. | ||
| Yes, you're playing golf. | ||
| Nothing's going on. Folks, it's all a lie. | ||
| He had no idea what was going on. | ||
| That's why they had to pull him from the golf course and he walks into the damn situation room with his golf shoes on and his golf shirt on and they say, President, here's an extra jacket we found. | ||
| Do you mind putting it on? | ||
| He was praised in 2011 for being on the golf course when the raid was going down. | ||
| Do you understand that? | ||
| And now they're attacking Trump for doing it when he wasn't even on the golf course. | ||
| He was on it the morning. | ||
| He was in the Situation Room hours before it went down. | ||
| So Trump bad, even though he wasn't on the golf course when the raid went down. | ||
| Obama good when he was on the golf course when the raid went down. | ||
| Do you understand how infuriating this is to see the media deception? | ||
| To see Google rigging reality with its search results? | ||
| I'm furious right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm pissed. | |
| Excuse me. | ||
| Excuse me. I just wish America could see this, folks. | ||
| I wish America could see the blatant deception. | ||
| I wish they could see how Obama, no matter what he did, was always just glorious and charismatic and perfect. | ||
| And no matter what Trump does, he is the worst. | ||
| And now they bring out this Ukrainian official for their whistleblower cover. | ||
| It's a cover for all their fake whistleblowers. | ||
| They bring out a military man. | ||
| Alright, I tried my best to maintain my cool last segment and I lost it. | ||
| Uh... How can you blame me? | ||
| But the crew brought some chill force in during the break. | ||
| Deep relaxation formula at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| One of the great InfoWars Life supplements on sale right now at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| So we'll see if it works for me as I try to get through the rest of this news. | ||
| I'm sorry. I just get legitimately angry when I see the media engage in blatant deception because I know the average American has no idea what's going on. | ||
| And then they'll never know. | ||
| And Trump gets demonized for what Obama did. | ||
| It drives me insane. | ||
| And you saw it. So let's get into the rest of these developments here. | ||
| So you've seen it now. | ||
| This army officer who heard Trump's Ukraine call reported concerns. | ||
| Turns out he's a colonel in the army from Ukraine. | ||
| And loyalties clearly still lie with Ukraine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But this is all, you know... | |
| I'm not sure the level to which it's fake, but it's fake. | ||
| Because this is really just a cover your ass operation by the Democrats because they know all their whistleblowers were fake. | ||
| They never had whistleblowers. | ||
| It may have even been Adam Schiff. | ||
| Blowing his own whistle. | ||
| Pun not intended. | ||
| He probably does that too. The point is, this is them running a CYA campaign because all their whistleblower stuff was fake news. | ||
| Kind of like how the Ukrainian timeline narrative was to distract them from the fact that Russian collusion failed and the Mueller report failed. | ||
| So it's just stack on stack on stack of CYA operations, but now... | ||
| They can just put it all on this colonel and say, oh, he was doing it for legitimate reasons. | ||
| He's an army man. | ||
| He's a military man. You can't question him. | ||
| You know, throw Flynn in the, you know, throw him in the gulag and don't worry about, oh, but this Ukrainian loyalty, no, no, no, no. | ||
| Military man. And then you see what happens. | ||
| Well, you can't blame the media for overreacting. | ||
| That's not a crime. You can't blame Adam Schiff for overreacting. | ||
| That's not a crime. It's just one concerned army man. | ||
| Yes, folks, give me a break. | ||
| That's not what happened. | ||
| This was clearly all orchestrated by the Democrats, and now this one individual is their CYA moment. | ||
| And so, what will they drum up next? | ||
| Well, they had to continue the legitimacy of these fake impeachment claims, so that's why they ran out this military man and said, oh, he did it. | ||
| Nothing to see here. And then what do they do? | ||
| House Democrats released text of Thursday impeachment resolution. | ||
| That's from Zero Hedge. | ||
| And so the Republicans are not going to go along with this, but it's going to happen. | ||
| And they always plan on doing this, folks. | ||
| It's the Democrat Party. They're wanting criminals. | ||
| Are you kidding me? They've never seen a crime they didn't want to commit. | ||
| And when Obama got in, they really – it's like they took the governors off themselves, folks. | ||
| I mean it's just high crimes out of the Obama administration. | ||
| And it's all coming out, and Trump has pretty much told you it's treason. | ||
| And so that's all developing. | ||
| But understand this whole Ukrainian army, man. | ||
| That's a CYA for all the fake whistleblowers that the Democrats tried to bring forward that didn't pan out. | ||
| Now you have... | ||
| By the way, this is incredible. Nobody played this. | ||
| Trump is... This guy is unbelievable. | ||
| You can't even keep up with him. He was speaking to the police chiefs in Chicago over the weekend, maybe. | ||
| And the Chicago mayor skipped, Lori Lightfoot, and the Chicago police superintendent, Eddie Johnson, also skipped. | ||
| They both gave derogatory remarks before Trump came saying, oh, we're not going to go. | ||
| Trump's a buffoon, yada, yada, yada. | ||
| Well... Trump got rousing applause from the police chiefs and he lambasted both of them. | ||
| And in fact, I wish I had time to play the speech. | ||
| He lays it all out. He says, here's the number of murders that have happened since Lori Lightfoot became mayor. | ||
| Here's the number of murders and killings and shootings that have happened under Eddie Johnson's watch. | ||
| And by the way, what happened with that whole Jussie Smollett thing? | ||
| Oh, they're covering it up. | ||
| So you see, nobody plays that though. | ||
| And it's just, oh, Chicago police superintendent doesn't like Trump, he must be bad. | ||
| Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot doesn't like Trump, he must be bad. | ||
| No, they skipped out on an event for the police chiefs there out of their own selfishness. | ||
| And the truth is, they lacked the spine to face Donald Trump. | ||
| They lacked the courage to face Donald Trump. | ||
| That's why they really couldn't show up. | ||
| And they couldn't face their police chiefs either, because they've let them down too. | ||
| Let me just continue to pile drive through this news. | ||
| Greg Walden to retire in latest sign of GOP doubts about retaking the House. | ||
| 19 House Republicans have now retired, folks. | ||
| That's not a coincidence. | ||
| Republicans are worried about their worst nightmare and across-the-board wipeout in 2020. | ||
| That's from Axios. | ||
| I don't know how worried they really are about that, but these House retirements are definitely hindering their chances. | ||
| But the Democrat Party has the same concerns the Washington Post today. | ||
| The Democrat establishment is right to panic. | ||
| Well, they have no real frontrunner, and Hillary Clinton is the real frontrunner. | ||
| Ha ha! And now, a spokesman for the Hillary campaign basically said, don't count her out just yet. | ||
| That demon witch is about to crawl out of the crypt and run for president again. | ||
| Amazing. Now, on to the more Trump is responsible for everything news here. | ||
| Getty Fire Investigation examines utility poles near where Blaze started for a possible arson. | ||
| Now, this is wild. And again, I don't even have the time to necessarily do this, but guys, see if you can pull up the biggest wildfires in California history. | ||
| I believe like the top five, like four of the top five have happened in the last two or three years. | ||
| This latest one is set to, I think, get on that list too. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But here's the sad thing. | |
| It's all very suspicious, but suspicions aside of what's causing these fires, look at what's going on in California, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| It's burning to the ground. | ||
| There's literally poop on the streets. | ||
| The economy is tanking. | ||
| Silicon Valley is sucking all the wealth. | ||
| By the way, more billionaires live in California than any other state, but it also has the most poverty. | ||
| You see how that works? | ||
| And they're all liberals there, too. | ||
| They're run by the Democrats. | ||
| But so what's going on with these fires? | ||
| Is it natural? | ||
| Is there arson? | ||
| Is there something that we can't even measure happening here? | ||
| So the guys pulled that up. | ||
| So they have been dispersed actually throughout the years. | ||
| But this is the third year in a row where massive wildfires of historical proportions are breaking out in California. | ||
| But it's becoming more clear. | ||
| As Jerry Brown says, the California fires show the horror we will face from climate change. | ||
| That's not true. | ||
| I'll explain why. 25 horrifying photos of the California fires that Trump hasn't said a word about. | ||
| Again, that's not true. | ||
| That's just a total lie. | ||
| California fires remind us Trump could be impeached over climate change. | ||
| No! No! | ||
| The nation, as California burns, Trump feeds the cult of personality. | ||
| And then anger rises as California utility imposes more blackouts. | ||
| So, rolling blackouts, California's burning to the ground, homeless epidemic, disease epidemic, the rich get richer out there, by the way, open borders, sanctuary city, poop on the streets, California is the Democrat... | ||
| Example of what happens under Democrat policies. | ||
| California is a third world hellhole unless you have millions of dollars now. | ||
| But let me explain something. | ||
| I went and I did as much research into this listening to California talk radio. | ||
| Firemen are calling in. | ||
| Policemen are calling in. People on government boards are calling in. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, years ago, California enacted laws to protect wildlife. | ||
| You can't backburn You can't do a fire break and so they've created this environment for these fires to break out and now they can't do anything about it because you don't have a fire break so when a fire breaks out you light the other side and then you stop it. | ||
| They don't have that anymore. | ||
| They aren't even allowed to chop down trees next to the power lines. | ||
| They made that illegal. | ||
| They made back burning illegal so you could stop this crap. | ||
| So it's literally all Democrat, 100%, all Democrat policies that have allowed these fires to break out. | ||
| Of course we have the technology. | ||
| Of course we have the means. | ||
| Of course we have the resources to stop this. | ||
| The Democrats stopped them from all being rolled out. | ||
| And it's all ancient stuff. | ||
| Backburning, fire breaks. | ||
| This has been well known for hundreds if not thousands of years. | ||
| But what happens? The Democrats make it impossible to stop these things because of their environmental laws. | ||
| The whole environment ends up getting destroyed because of it, and then what do they do? | ||
| They blame Trump. And I'm telling you, man, I'm going to remain calm here, but let me tell you, it's unbelievable how the Democrats literally... | ||
| Blame Trump for everything they've done. | ||
| I mean, where do you start? | ||
| Where have you been? Colluding with Russia? | ||
| That was the Democrats. They blame Trump. | ||
| Election meddling? The Democrats are engaged in that still. | ||
| They blame Trump. Golfing during a raid of a terrorist? | ||
| That was Obama. They blame Trump. | ||
| Fires breaking out in California? | ||
| That's literally Democrat policies. | ||
| They blame Trump. I'm sick of these Democrat liars, man! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tell me what an activist looks like. This is what an activist looks like. | |
| Tell me what a role model looks like. This is what a role model looks like. | ||
| Now you induce vomiting. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Tell me what a feminist looks like. This is what a feminist looks like. | |
| Tell me what a Democrat looks like. | ||
| By the way, pull up my, uh, turn that off. | ||
| Pull up my Twitter, guys. | ||
| You know, we always make fun of Brian Stelter for looking like Pennywise the Clown. | ||
| It's actually AOC. She literally has Pennywise teeth. | ||
| I'm not even kidding you. | ||
| If you go to my Twitter and look at my replies, AOC was in some, no, not the seat, but that was me comparing Stelter to Pennywise. | ||
| Pretty accurate, actually. But look at Pennywise's teeth and then go to my replies and look at the zoom-in I did on AOC's teeth. | ||
| And we've been missing out here. | ||
| It's actually AOC that has the Pennywise smile. | ||
| I mean, literally, her teeth are like... | ||
| I mean, we've all seen, like, the donkey teeth, but her undergarment teeth are like Pennywise the clown. | ||
| It's pretty... Yeah, tell me that's not the Pennywise look. | ||
| We all floatin' socialist world with AOC. All right, you guys kind of distracted me there, but we are about to run this AOC clip. | ||
| So here's what the Democrats are now doing, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| While Adam Schiff is engaged in criminal activity, running this illegal impeachment inquiry, they've now launched hearings. | ||
| So what they've done is they've launched hearings where congressmen have to be on the floor while the Democrats are engaged in their shadow, secret, illegal impeachment inquiries. | ||
| And then the Democrats are like, oh, well, what do you mean you don't want to be part of this? | ||
| You know what you're doing. | ||
| So here's what happened today on the floor of Congress. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And I just want to know what the reason for such a disrespect of our process would potentially be. | |
| Do we have a reason for why this here in the championship? | ||
| You know, pause it right there. I'm sorry. | ||
| I'm sorry. It's just... See, that's what I'm saying. | ||
| They're the ones breaking the law. | ||
| They're the ones ignoring the process. | ||
| I'm sorry. It's just... | ||
| It's unbelievable. | ||
| I mean, these people are blatant liars. | ||
| I mean, like, what? I just... | ||
| I can't believe it. The devil is your daddy. | ||
| The devil is AOC's daddy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Here, go back. You know, do we have just like a cocktail party? | |
| It has. I have one. I have a really easy one. | ||
| The oil industry is the second largest industry in my state. | ||
| My constituents expect me to be here. | ||
| We are running an impeachment hearing down in the basement of the Capitol right now. | ||
| Wait, is this about the oil industry? | ||
| No, it's about the economy of the state of North Dakota and my constituents. | ||
| And North Dakota. I want to participate in this hearing, but I also feel the need to be in the SCIF because we're only one of three committees that's allowed to be in the room. | ||
| I can do a lot of things. | ||
| I can't be two places at once. | ||
| I'm completely comfortable having this hearing. | ||
| I just prefer to have it at a time when I can participate in it. | ||
| This was a conversation that was brought up, and this could not have been brought up before we convened the senator and the governor. | ||
| We're doing this when they're here. | ||
| We've expressed this last week about having two things going on at the same time. | ||
| It's not like we haven't talked about this, but you guys continue to do hearings at the same time there are depositions going on. | ||
| As the gentleman from North Dakota said, we can't be two places at once. | ||
| You talk about wanting to do your job? | ||
| There's no way to do that when you have to be two places at once. | ||
| And just to be clear, there was exactly one Democrat in the room when this started. | ||
| See, I mean, folks, the deception, the illegality, the crimes, I mean, I really don't even want to think about it because it's so infuriating. | ||
| Because my challenge when I started on this journey was to inform Americans so that they wouldn't be deceived by the fake news, so that they could make intelligent, informed decisions. | ||
| But my God! The lies of the Democrats, the deception. | ||
| I mean, they just ramp it up every day and they know it. | ||
| And then they sit there and they're like, what? | ||
| I didn't do anything. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| Oh, you know exactly what you're doing. | ||
| And of course they send AOC out there to be the one running the distraction campaign. | ||
| Of course they do. | ||
| I mean, it's unbelievable what the Democrats are doing right now. | ||
| And you know, I'll just say this. | ||
| You know, Trump controls his own destiny at this point. | ||
| He could decide to have all these people locked up tomorrow. | ||
| I'm not saying that's the smart move. | ||
| I'm not saying that's the right move. I'm just saying we know what these people are doing. | ||
| They're engaged in blatant treason. | ||
| Obama, his administration, and now the Democrats just are continuing that with this fake impeachment process. | ||
| I mean, it wouldn't take more than a week to investigate Nancy Pelosi to find something. | ||
| How'd she earn $200 million? | ||
| Nancy, yeah. | ||
| What about Dianne Feinstein as a Chinese spy? | ||
| What about Adam Schiff blatantly lying? | ||
| What about all the ethics violations of Ilhan Omar and AOC? It's all on record. | ||
| We just get nothing! But, oh, Trump stubs his toe and let's run thousands of investigations that turn up nothing and then impeach him anyway. | ||
| I'm sorry. It's just... I gotta move on. | ||
| Drag queen accidentally flashes children at story hour. | ||
| Really? Accidentally? You think? | ||
| Accidentally doesn't have underwear on. | ||
| Accidentally wears an open skirt. | ||
| Accidentally shows children their genitalia. | ||
| If I did that at a park, I'd be arrested and labeled as a sexual predator. | ||
| But if you do it as a drag queen at the library... | ||
| Oops, silly me. Did you like my little genitals? | ||
| Oh, see kids? | ||
| It's just an accident, no big deal. | ||
| Well, I don't understand this. | ||
| It's three females and then Rachel Maddow. | ||
| So I'm just trying to figure that one out. | ||
| But yeah, that's really what we need. | ||
| It's all about women's issues. | ||
| No, people want to know about what are you going to do for the economy? | ||
| What are you going to do about safety for this nation? | ||
| What are you going to do about the wide open borders? | ||
| So get ready for this total clown show. | ||
| I wonder if they'll say men can have periods and get pregnant. | ||
| A story in the nation down the alt-right rabbit hole. | ||
| Now, here's the funny thing about this story. | ||
| You'll notice Alex Jones is featured in the cover photo, right? | ||
| Down the alt-right rabbit hole, there's Alex Jones. | ||
| So you're thinking, huh, okay, InfoWars and Alex Jones. | ||
| Guess what, ladies and gentlemen? InfoWars and Alex Jones isn't even mentioned in this article. | ||
| Huh? So, they put Alex Jones as the face of the alt-right, and then they don't even put him in the story. | ||
| I mean, what the hell is that? And by the way, I don't claim to be alt-right. | ||
| We never do. I mean, whatever. It's just like weird things they engage in. | ||
| Newsbusters, Google funds 29 U.S. journalism projects that decidedly swing left. | ||
| So, not only are they funding leftist journalists, but they're rigging the search results so that you only see their news that they want. | ||
| Total deception. Luke Radowski of We Are Change. | ||
| Pretty amazing video. Got onto Epstein Island for about 20 minutes before they literally had to breathlessly run off the island and then motorboat away. | ||
| So if you want to check that out, Jamie White relinks that at Infowars.com. | ||
| Kenan Thompson. From all that fame, now does SNL. It seems like there's a new day approaching as the nation deals with Trump fatigue, and he's basically saying, I can't tell if he's signaling like, hey, we're sick of this anti-Trump stuff too, but he's saying that the audience is sick of it, so it may be Trump fatigue and they may be moving on. | ||
| We'll see. You know, I mean, Trump just brings down, what, how many pedophile networks now? | ||
| Like five, six, seven? | ||
| So yeah, you know, the nation's kind of sick of you demonizing an American hero. | ||
| John Legend's Baby It's Cold Outside cover features the line, It's Your Body and Your Choice. | ||
| So isn't that nice? We now have to rewrite music for the Me Too era. | ||
| So I'm really looking forward to the new Snoop albums and all the old rap albums about beating women, pimping hoes, cracking a hoes head. | ||
| I'm really looking to the new Me Too remakes of all of those songs. | ||
| Should be entertaining. | ||
| Don't hold your breath. | ||
| Apple resumes human reviews of Siri Audio with iPhone update. | ||
| Ooh, so that's nice. | ||
| So Apple said, oops, we're sorry, we were listening to you having sex. | ||
| We'll stop that to now saying, well, we're going to keep listening to you having sex. | ||
| Cool, Apple. Bunch of perverts over there. | ||
| Is Facebook censoring conservatives or just moderating too hard? | ||
| No, there's no censorship at Facebook. | ||
| No, no, no, no. By the way, I'm starting to think now after my interview with Cyrus that Trump meeting with these people that he knows are anti-him, anti-free speech, anti-truth. | ||
| Maybe he's like, look, I know you guys hate reality, hate me, but can we not allow you to become a tool for the Chinese to roll out their social credit score nationwide? | ||
| Can we not allow your platforms to be used by the Chinese to conquer the world? | ||
| That'd be great, thanks. | ||
| By the way, keep censoring my supporters, but just don't let China take over the world. | ||
| Washington Examiner, records 67.3 million speak foreign language at home, over 50% in 90 big cities, 59% in Los Angeles. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, that's how racist this country is, how xenophobic this country is. | ||
| We don't even have a national language of English anymore. | ||
| So, yeah, it's so tough. | ||
| NCAA hopes to avoid court fight on compensation. | ||
| Well, brilliant move by the crooks over there at the NCAA. I gotta give them credit. | ||
| They realize they're screwed on this deal, so they've allowed athletes to profit off their image, their likeness, but the NCAA still doesn't have to pay a dime, so they still get that slave labor. | ||
| Oh, excuse me, student-athlete labor. | ||
| Smart move by the NCAA. Kind of the right thing, but not really. | ||
| Oh, you know what? | ||
| I really should maybe have a guest on because people are telling me about how Latin America and Argentina, it's going left now. | ||
| It's not good. Argentina's Fernandez pledges to turn the page as left wins power. | ||
| So conservative nationalism... | ||
| Free market in Argentina is going the other way. | ||
| The anti-neoliberal wave rocking Latin America. | ||
| Lebanon's Hariri, that's the prime minister, resigns after two weeks of protests. | ||
| And the UK is going to vote again on Brexit. | ||
| So what is this, the 5th, 7th, 10th, 9th time? | ||
| You know, you won't get it. That does it for today's War Room. | ||
| Thanks to everybody for tuning in. | ||
| you stay classy, InfoWarriors. | ||
| We'll see you next time. | ||
| This sale on some items on the site is the biggest sale we've ever offered. | ||
| 40 to 70% off, store-wide. | ||
| Many of these are at cost or below. | ||
| Because we're offering free shipping on every order and double Patriot points. | ||
| Take advantage of the everything must go sale and the funds that come in allow us to fund ourselves into next year and order new product for next year at Infowarsstore.com. |
Export Selection