Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 26, 2019 - War Room - Owen Shroyer

02:10:43

America Must Stand With Trump As Democrats Move Towards Impeachment - War Room Full Show

Source

Participants

Main voices

owen shroyer

01:03:21

robert barnes

39:39

Appearances

alex jones

01:49

jon bowne

02:24

Clips

alexandria ocasio-cortez

00:15

chuck schumer

00:35

donald j trump

00:53

joe biden

00:44

nancy pelosi

00:16

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		♪♪ ♪♪ Acting Director of National Intelligence threatened to resign if he couldn't speak freely before Congress on whistleblower complaint.
		Now, my understanding of this, of course, is from the Washington Post, so they'll spin it, make anything look bad about Trump.
		My understanding is that It's kind of like what they try to do with Roger Stone.
		They say, oh, we can only have closed-door hearings.
		That way they can lie about him, manipulate him, and destroy him, and he gets no public speech.
		And he even gets gagged.
		So, to me, I think that's what the Director of National Intelligence is trying to avoid, is to just say, hey, wait a second, I'll testify publicly and put all this on record so that you guys can't lie and manipulate it by doing a closed-door hearing.
		So, ladies and gentlemen, today we had that hearing with Joseph Maguire, and it went exactly as I thought it would.
		And so much so that the president tweeted out afterwards, you had Adam Schiff, little Adam Schiff, making things up whole cloth from the transcript that wasn't there.
		And this is in a congressional hearing that his committee is chairing.
		And if this would have been done behind closed doors, they would have gotten away with the whole thing.
		But because they had to do it publicly in front of America, on television, everyone saw what the Democrats were engaged in.
		Everybody saw little Adam Schiff with a D. President tweeted it out today, little with a D. We told you that.
		It's not good, folks.
		There's a reason that little bug-eyed pest is up there like a total fraud.
		And I'm sitting there and I'm watching this and I'm like...
		Can you imagine?
		It's the old emperor has no clothes.
		But it's beyond just the emperor's up there naked.
		Can you imagine?
		That... Imagine a demon just totally uncloaked.
		I mean, that's Adam Schiff.
		And I'm telling you, there's a reason why Trump puts it with a D. Mm-hmm.
		Give me some of that Patriot Blend coffee from TheForrestore.com.
		Go ahead and bring it. Give me some of that smooth blend.
		That smooth Patriot blend from InfoWarsStore.com.
		Thank you so much. Hot coffee.
		I've got the best crew in the business.
		And you know what? I will say this.
		We're going to get into the main of today's show.
		When we come back from this break, Bob Barnes is going to be joining me in studio.
		I think that's our only guest today.
		Is Bob Barnes our only guest today?
		So that means we'll have time for your phone calls too.
		More reactions. Right now, I'm going to get into this with Bob Barnes.
		It looks like the Democrats are going to impeach him.
		Looks like they're actually going to impeach the President.
		Wow. Now that's going to bring in about $100 million overnight in campaign funds for the President, but that's really neither here nor there.
		America is not going to be down with this.
		But as we played that clip, just a short example of me saying, yeah, this is going to be an open-door testimony so that McGuire can go on public record showing how disingenuous these Democrats really are.
		And it went exactly as we expected.
		So, I wanted to mention, though...
		You can get clips of the Infowars War Room.
		We do a five-minute recap of the broadcast every day and we put that on our band.video page.
		So if you go find the War Room page on band.video, the five-minute recap is there for your viewing and listening pleasure.
		So if you don't have the full three hours to listen to The War Room and you just wanted to get a five-minute recap in, we put it there for you every day.
		Five-minute recap. Band.video.
		Just go to The War Room section of Band.video and you'll find all our video contents, the full show and the five-minute recap.
		And we might be doing a little bit more of pulling clips from old shows, too, just to show you.
		We're tomorrow's news today here.
		Woo! It's September 26, 2019.
		Hard to believe, isn't it? Here on this Thursday live transmission of the Infowars.com war room brought to you by Infowarsstore.com.
		The big story is the Democrats are moving to impeach the President of the United States.
		In fact, Where is my story?
		I didn't print it out today. Guys, find the story from Grabian.
		I believe it was 86 reasons that the Democrats—I forget the number.
		I think it's from Grabian.
		86 reasons the Democrats have given to impeach the president.
		So they're constantly moving the goalposts.
		They're constantly making new things up.
		They're constantly holding press conferences.
		They're constantly picking a new target.
		They're constantly picking a new narrative.
		They're constantly engaging in lies and deception.
	And then they give you the reanimated husk of Nancy Pelosi to tell you that, oh, we're going to file an impeachment inquiry based on all the information that I haven't seen.
	Oh. And so this is the test.
	That America faces part two.
	It's like the second part of your semester and we're about to have the final and the midterm was 2016.
	And now the final is going to be 2020.
	Now I have actually, I have had many moments, days, segments where I have come off as what people think is anti-Trump.
	No, I'm just being critical of the president.
	But there is no doubt heading into 2020 what the test for America is.
	Do you want a corrupt shadow group, which can be labeled as the Democrat Party or the Deep State in modern nomenclature, do you want a shadow group of bullies and terrorists and liars and Who have now had 86 different reasons Trump could be impeached.
	That list is on Grabian.
	Who are now making up...
	Think about this. They held three years of investigations for Trump-Russia collusion.
	Three years. They got nothing.
	Couldn't impeach the president on that.
	A story comes out in the Washington Post...
	From an unknown source, a third party of information, and they are moving for impeachment within a week of that release?
	If you don't see the game plan here, you're not paying attention.
	So America has a choice for 2020.
	Do we want a president that stands up for America?
	Do we want a president that is going to stand up for America in the face of globalism?
	Do we want a president that is going to Just be the president and not be a total phony liar?
	And isn't in this group of corrupt politicians?
	Or what else would America get?
	I mean, they don't have a Hillary Clinton this round.
	So it's going to be even more pathetic.
	But when you see everything the Democrats are doing right now to try to get Trump out, and it's not just the Democrats, But they'll wear the mask.
	They'll be the face of impeachment.
	It'll be Pelosi. It'll be Schiff.
unidentified		It'll be Nadler. I mean, just think.
		I mean...
		Pelosi and Schiff and Nadler.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		These are the dirtbags that are going to get Trump removed from office.
		Nadler and Pelosi, who have been in office for 30 years each...
		They're what's wrong with government.
		They're what's wrong with the system.
		And now, they're the ones trying to get Trump removed from office, and they will impeach him.
		And Chuckie Schumer, that dirtbag, who went on national television and warned you, the deep state is real, the deep state is powerful, and And the deep state will destroy this country.
		Oh, I'm sorry. I was paraphrasing.
		He said, the intelligence agencies have six ways of Sunday of getting back at you.
unidentified		Getting back at you?
		How dare you win the election, Trump?
		How dare you be the President of the United States, Trump?
		How dare the American people decide their destiny?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We're going to destroy you with our corrupt intelligence agencies.
		You know, I'm thinking about this as they're trying to put Roger Stone, an innocent man, behind bars right now for lying to the FBI over a non-existent crime.
		How about this?
		I've got a new theory.
		I've got a new proposal.
		I've got a new idea that I'm not hearing jockeyed around.
		How about this?
		Lying to the FBI is not a crime.
unidentified		How about go F yourself?
unidentified		How do you like that? Yeah, you know what?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Screw the FBI. But you see, since it's a crime to lie to the FBI, they can just set you up.
		And it's really not even lying.
		You just make a mistake and say the wrong thing and they destroy you and they put you in jail.
		But of course that's not really what it is.
		It's politically motivated.
		That's what they've done to Flynn.
		That's what they've done to Manafort.
		That's what they're going to do to Roger Stone.
		And it's sickening.
		But on top of it all, there sits Donald Trump.
		And they're going to try to impeach him.
		Again, Schumer and Pelosi and Nadler and these people have been in government for probably nearly 100 combined years.
		You throw that bug-eyed, penciled Schiff in there, they've got 100 years, I bet, of government experience.
unidentified		They are what's wrong with government.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They are what's wrong with the system, not Donald Trump.
		And they are the ones trying to destroy Trump.
		You know what? Sometimes it takes a while to get the rocket boosters going, get into orbit here.
		I'm going to talk about this with Robert Barnes, because he's informed with this as anyone else.
		Because he said it yesterday, but we should really bear down on this.
		Ukraine... has been used as a center of corruption for so long.
		That's why there's so much, as Robert Barnes said yesterday, money laundering, political laundering, weapons laundering, it goes through Ukraine because it's been so corrupt for so long.
		But Trump, now working with the new president of Ukraine, Under the parameters of legislation signed by Bill Clinton and proposed by Joe Biden.
		Yeah, that's right. See, they thought writing that legislation would sit them pretty to rig prosecutions in the future with Ukraine and the United States.
		Another reason why they did a lot of their illegal activity there.
		They had it rigged in the books.
		Uh-oh. But now we have the presidency.
		And not you, Biden.
		No, not you, Clinton.
		Trump has it, and he's using it against you.
		And you are scared.
		You are scared to your very core, because you know at the dirt bottom of this, you were all involved with Jeffrey Epstein.
		You were all involved with Russiagate.
		You were all involved with UkraineGate.
		All of you.
		And who knows what else you were involved in, making $100 million while you were in office, Nancy Pelosi?
		Who knows what else you're involved in, little Adam Schiff who looked like you just sucked the essence out of an entire group of preschool kids, you demon?
		Who knows what else these people are really up to?
		But it ain't political, folks.
		There is something dark and sinister beneath this group of corrupt individuals.
		Bob Barnes in studio with us on the other side.
		We're going to break it all down and tell you about why Ukraine was a center point for corruption.
		Always a pleasure to have Robert Barnes in studio.
		Yesterday, we got into some of the litigation that will be ongoing where Infowars is going to have to Look at the Young Turks and others to say, hey, you're not going to lie about us and get away with it.
		We'll see your ass in court.
		But today, I want to get into some other stuff with Bob because this whole impeachment thing has really gone nuclear, quite frankly.
		And at this moment, I think we would both agree.
		I expect the Democrats to impeach Donald Trump.
		And I think all they need...
		Is to flip two or three votes in the Senate.
		I think they can do that too with Romney and a few other neocon Republicans.
		And so we're sitting here, we're reviewing that.
		But I want to get into something that we both kind of had a revelation on when it came to crown strike in Ukraine.
		The laundering of information.
		The harboring of classified emails.
		The laundering of money, the exchange of influence all going through Ukraine, and how there was a bill signed, proposed by Biden, signed into law by Bill Clinton, which you can explain, that deals with the United States and Ukraine having to work together dealing with prosecutions, which we both figured, well, they thought they'd always have the Ukraine president, they'd always have the U.S. president, so they'd have control over Over any criminal proceedings there.
		They can launder money and information, classified information, have CrowdStrike as the, you know, the hub of all of it over there in Ukraine, and they're getting away with all of it.
		That's probably where Trump said, and that's the thing too, so let's get into this Ukraine as a front for all this corruption.
		Trump said, hmm, because he was joking in the campaign, said, oh, maybe the Russians have it.
		He said, well, maybe those emails, the 33,000 emails are in Ukraine.
		Actually, they probably are.
		They probably are in Ukraine.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		There's no doubt.
		I mean, what happened is Ukraine is sort of opens the door to deep state corruption and deep state collusion at a degree to which we were talking about yesterday, just sort of at a broad scale level.
		But now the sort of minute details have come out that prove it and substantiate it even further.
		First, you have the company that Hunter Biden, Joe Biden's son, was receiving that lucrative contract, $50,000 a month contract, for no justifiable reason that any independent third party expert could justify or verify.
		Or substantiate the basis for.
		At that same, one of the other key board of directors was a Mitt Romney ally, a Mitt Romney National Security Advisor, a guy with longtime ties and allegiances to the CIA and the intelligence community in the United States, was also on that board.
		So what you had was what looked like a deep state front operation for laundering and funneling funds out of the Ukraine for the self-enrichment and self-empowerment of corrupt elites in the United States and Ukraine.
		And so what the president was actually exposing was deep state corruption, deep state collusion, and it appears they are the ones behind this actual impeachment effort.
		Today, there's been further confirmation of that.
		The whistleblower has been identified by Breitbart and others as it appears to be a CIA agent assigned to the White House.
		So it's the CIA clearly running it.
		So it's the CIA, and he conspired with a lawyer who apparently is representing him, who publicly has said he's representing him, is also an ex-CIA spook, who is a longtime political ally of, guess who, ex-CIA director under Obama, John Brennan.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And let's remember, too, they're on record saying we're going to put spies in the White House.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Yes, exactly. I mean, James Comey bragged about it.
		James Comey bragged about the things he could get away with that he would not be able to get away with in another administration because of the loose architecture.
		Remember, this is why they took Flynn out first.
		They targeted Flynn because Flynn was the guy who had the intelligence support, the military support, the national security support, who knew the white hats in the CIA, the white hats in the NSA, the white hats in the military.
		So basically, because if you really try to think about this intellectually, it's like We're good to go.
		It would support the president's independent agenda, not the deep state agenda.
		To give an example, I had a high-ranking Trump ally contact me and wouldn't even contact me over regular email or phone.
		He had a beard or sort of a cutout contact me first and say he needed to reach me.
		Created a separate special Signal account.
		By the way, for all those people out there, Signal is the most secure app in the world.
		For any app, if you want to communicate by cell phone technology or other mobile technology, Signal is legit.
		And it was ultimately confirmed when this individual was one of the top people involved in national security in the country who knew all about cyber control, who wanted to communicate with me about representing or giving legal advice to a high-ranking military individual who was under potential investigation related to General Flynn.
		And so these communicated to me by signal and found out about it.
		And the person who he wanted me to help was someone who had an impeccable 30-year pedigree who Mueller in the deep state was putting under microscopic investigation solely because Flynn had listed, here's who the White Hats are.
		So all the Black Hats not only wanted to take out Flynn, but they waited until Flynn identified who the White Hats are and targeted all the White Hats.
		So the... That's why they took them out.
		This is another deep state coup attempt.
		They planted a CIA spy in the White House to spy on the president, conspired with Brennan's allies and Democratic lawyers on the outside to coordinate and create a fake whistleblower complaint that then led to Schiff today doing a fake transcript from the stand that was a lie and a libel against the president of the United States.
		That's unbelievable. And you had Pelosi just now confirm that the Intelligence Committee is going to be running the impeachment effort.
		The Intelligence Committee has no supervision, oversight supervision over the president for impeachment purposes.
		That should be the Judiciary Committee.
		It's always been the Judiciary Committee.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I've got clips of Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi.
		They even say, like, Pelosi, we played yesterday.
		It's like, well, I haven't read the transcript.
		I mean, I'm trying not to curse right now.
		But it's like, I mean, you know.
		And then Chuck Schumer's like, well, you know, we don't know the basis yet, but we're going to find it out.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They've been told by the deep state to do this.
		And that's the reason why Pelosi, who's seen the polling, seen the focus groups that say the American people have no interest, no desire, no want for an impeachment of any kind.
		They see impeachment as an impeachment of them, the American people, their right to vote, their right to control elections, their right to determine and dictate who the president of the United States is going to be.
		And they know that, so why are they doing it?
		Why are they doing something that's so politically unpopular?
		Why are they doing something that now 60% of the predicted betting markets say will happen, impeachment will happen, President Trump will face a removal trial?
		It's because this is the intelligence community, the deep state coup, part two, going again after the president, after Mueller's efforts failed.
		They're now doing it using the Democrats as the face, the Democrats as the beard, the Democrats as the mask of what is really an intelligence operation, Well, and I was saying that, too.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I was saying it was the coup part two.
		Alex was saying part three today.
		I guess if it was part three, it'd be the illegal spying by Obama would be one.
		Right. And then you'd have Russiagate two, Ukrainegate three.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, you had sort of the illicit spying was not yet a coup because he was just a candidate.
		Right. So I think what Alex is saying is it's sort of deep state investigation or attempts to undermine the president, part three.
		That's true. But in terms of a coup attempt, it's part two because this is the second time since he's been elected.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, here's why I am now believing that the Democrats will impeach Trump.
		The whistleblower complaint into impeachment just shows that they don't care.
		They're moving to impeach. They've already decided it.
		Whatever it takes, they're going all in.
		They're going for impeachment. Doesn't matter.
		They had three years of Russian investigation.
		They got nothing. No impeachment.
		They had one week from a hearsay third-party source over intelligence that got released to the public, and they impeach over that.
		That, to me, says, nope, they're going for impeachment.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They sent a blanket diamond and said, please sign here, and Pelosi was happy to do that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, we'll get more into this with Bob Barnes on the other side of this break.
		Don't go anywhere. All right, we've actually got some behind-the-scenes footage.
		This is behind-the-scenes.
		The deep state with Biden and others were discussing how they used the Ukraine, and then the Ukrainian people were going to stand up and elect a new president.
		We had some behind-the-scenes footage.
unidentified		Let's go to that, guys. Are you sure you know where the impound yard is?
		Oh, stop stalling.
		Come on. I can't think.
		There's all this noise. Or is it because I've built a stronghold around Greenland, I've driven you out of Western Europe, and I've left you teetering on the brink of complete annihilation?
		I'm not beaten yet.
		I still have armies in the Ukraine.
		The Ukraine.
		You know what the Ukraine is?
		It's a sitting duck.
		A road apple, Newman.
		The Ukraine is weak.
		It's feeble. I think it's time to put the hurt on the Ukraine.
		I come from Ukraine.
		You not say Ukraine weak?
		Yeah, well, we're playing a game here, pal.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Ukraine is game to you?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		How about I take your little bullets?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And so there you go. Ukraine not weak.
		Ukraine not feeble. That was behind the scene footage of the globalists in the deep state thinking Ukraine was weak and feeble.
		And the Ukrainian people put in a new president.
		You saw it right there. Exclusive footage right here on the war room.
		That's actually funny. They mentioned Greenland.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		They did, yeah. Which we're going to buy.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Put a nice hotel right on the corner.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		A nice new Trump real estate endeavor in Greenland.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Precisely. Free Greenland.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Free America. Add a 52nd state after the moon.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, yeah, yeah. First, you've got to territorialize the moon, and then we'll move to Greenland, which is probably less inhabitable, or less habitable than the moon, potentially.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All joking aside, though, for real, they've been using Ukraine as a hub of corruption, laundering, political laundering.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		I mean, there's been human trafficking, drug trafficking, all kinds of criminal operations, a proxy war between the European Union and Russia, the effort of the U.S. to use it as a money laundering technique, involve neo-Nazis in their operation, those with an actual Nazi legacy.
		The CIA ties to the Nazis in Ukraine date to the 1940s.
		It's one of our longest establishment, ongoing relationships with any Nazi party or Nazi members between the CIA and foreign governments.
		And so it goes to the core of it, what the scale of it wasn't revealed until today.
		When the board of directors of the same business entity and the same business corporation, laundering funds to the Bidens out of Ukraine, turned out to be a major ex-CIA related official with deep ties to the deep state, with alignments with Mitt Romney, actually served as Mitt Romney's key national security advisor in his 2012 presidential campaign.
		He ended up being implicated.
		You have an ex-CIA agent, or actually current CIA agent, who turned assigned to the White House, or turns out to be the illicit leaker, using his CIA role at the White House to spy on President Trump, using ex-CIA spies, who now operate as lawyers on the outside, who are allied with John Brennan, now using Adam Schiff at the Intelligence Committee, likely pre-scooped and pre-arranged this whole fake memo, fake whistleblower story, with Adam Schiff, dating all the way back to August.
		The Intelligence Committee now running the impeachment effort, when the Intelligence Committee has no business running an impeachment effort, never has.
		The Intelligence Committees are mostly a form of a post-1970s committees, didn't even exist before then.
		They're supposed to regulate the Intelligence Community, and instead they're subservient to the Intelligence Committee.
		That's why you see Senator Burr in such a deferential role in the Senate Intelligence Committee on the Republican side.
		So it's no coincidence.
		This is a deep state intelligence community, rogue agents within the intelligence community, coup attempt against the elected president of the United States.
		It's part three in terms of Spygate to Russiagate to Ukrainegate in terms of their deep state coup attempts against the president.
		But it's deep state coup part two in the sense that it's Robert Mueller part two.
		Now as Adam Shifty Schiff, the intelligence committee, runs the operation instead.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, let me ask you this.
		As it comes out today that the whistleblower was CIA, if you read more into it, it's kind of unclear when he was in the White House at the CIA. In fact, it almost sounds like he wasn't with the CIA at the time of Trump's presidency, so that makes me think, is it John Brennan?
		But do you even believe that it was former CIA? Because they could just make up anything.
		I mean, they could just throw anything out there just to try to control the whole narrative.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It has the fingerprints of a CIA operation, or at least ex-CIA operation.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		So you have ex-CIA officials that are involved with Biden, that are involved with Romney, that are involved with the Ukrainian...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Because Brendan still has his security clearance, does he not?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Still does, absolutely, and he has deep ties.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And he could be tapping everyone's phone.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		There are people, the CIA, for people's sort of historical preface for this, go back to the 1970s.
		Look at what happened when the Church Committee started investigating the CIA, started outing CIA rogue operatives, started outing MKUltra, outing the various assassination attempts around the world, outing the U.S.'s role in overthrowing foreign governments.
		That's why we passed a law to prohibit that going forward.
		I actually had a lunch meeting with the CIA Director James Woolsey in the 1990s at the CIA in which he explained how the CIA planned to circumvent those rules on a regular basis.
		So the CIA has deep institutional operatives that are continually, that are sort of Bureaucratic administrative officials but with the power of the deep state behind it.
		Deep state meaning dual state in that they're administrative bureaucratic people who are unelected, not appointed by elected officials, but deep state because they have the power of the intelligence apparatus and law enforcement and national security and spying technologies and techniques that others don't.
		This memo read like a CIA memo because they have information from the OMB. How do they get information concerning what the Office of Management and Budget is doing?
		That was not publicly disclosed.
		They had access to transcripts of phone calls and phone conversations between the President of the United States and the President of a foreign nation.
		They have access to what inter-office communications were taking place with the Attorney General of the United States.
		So the only way in which they could have access to all of that is it's either NSA or it's CIA. It's NSA because the NSA is monitoring those conversations and communications on a regular basis or it's CIA. It's style of written.
		It's written like a CIA memo because it's speculative.
		It's hearsay riddled, but it makes it sound authoritative and informative.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and I wonder, too, I mean, an investigation needs to be done into this, I think, from Trump's perspective, because we know that they were illegally spying on him before he became president.
		Yes. While he was president.
		Yes. How do we know that this isn't just more illegal spying?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		This is clear evidence of illegal spying.
		The only way in which they could have this information and intel is if they were continually spying on him.
		So they are constantly spying on him.
		I mean, if I was the president in the Oval Office, I'd have the radio on in the background.
		I'd try to communicate as much outside as possible.
		Because it's clear, I think he knows that they're spying on him regularly and routinely.
		That's why he was confident and he wasn't worried or concerned about this transcript.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And he even said that in a tweet.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		He said, I know y'all are spying on me, paraphrasing.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. And that's what he's like.
		He's like, I don't care. I mean, to his credit, he's got cojones the size of Mexico.
		He's got a backbone that's really made of Pittsburgh steel.
		So that has allowed him to continue to march forward.
		But his real power is still the audience.
		His real power is still his base.
		His real power is still the American people.
		It's they're only willing to go forward to the degree they think they can get one over on the American people.
		So you have fake Nate Silver out there who's never been gold, always finishes second when it comes to political analysis and political betting.
		Too scared to even bet me in the political markets.
		I've offered him that about a dozen times.
		If this guy would put his money where his mouth is, you could at least have some respect for him.
		He's not. He's a total wuss.
		But he's out there today saying...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's actually funny. I'm sorry to cut you off.
		No, go ahead. Because... That's just kind of a microcosm of all of them right now.
		They never want to debate, but Nate Silver's like, he's the big odds.
		He has the numbers, and it's because I think he predicted one election one time or so?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		All he got right was 2012, and he got it right for all the wrong reasons.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And 2012 was the easiest election to predict.
		I wasn't even involved with politics, and I remember hearing people talk about it.
		I was like, oh, it's Obama by a landslide.
		They're like, well, you don't know that. I'm like, he's incumbent.
		He's got the media behind him.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. No party.
		I bet a lot of money on Obama.
		Would have made more money but for Nate sort of boosting Obama.
		But his reasons for boosting Obama were completely wrong.
		So it's like someone who bets a sports game and who tells you, oh, so-and-so's going to win because they're going to run the ball all over him.
		And then they get out there and they win because the other team has four fumbles, but they can't run the ball, right?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So they run for two yards, pass for 900.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. They had a bad prediction that happened that they got a coincidental lucky outcome.
		So Obama was going to win re-election for a while for the same reasons Trump is going to win re-election.
		Even if there's a sort of popular hashtag now that's going out there that's saying, you remove, we re-elect.
		Because removal doesn't prevent re-election.
		Even if the Senate votes to remove him, he's going back in.
		And then he's going to have twice the power.
		So that's what... They're running a little bit of a bluff game, the deep state intelligence community, because they don't want to antagonize the American people so much that the American people go all Frank Church committee on them.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What about from Trump's perspective?
		And let's maybe get into this on the other side.
		I feel like if they...
		I mean, when they... Yeah, they're going to impeach.
		When they do that, Trump only has one option at that point.
		He's got to declassify everything.
		He's got to release the hounds, right?
		He has no other choice but to expose the people that are trying to expose him.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Or maybe he makes it his re-election slogan.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's talk about that on the other side.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Don't go anywhere. That I fully support transparency on the so-called whistleblower information, even though it was supposedly second-hand information.
		Which is sort of interesting.
		And other things have come out about the whistleblower that are also maybe even more interesting.
		But also insist on transparency from Joe Biden and his son Hunter on the millions of dollars that have been quickly and easily taken out of Ukraine and China.
		Millions of dollars.
		Millions and millions of dollars taken out very rapidly.
		Well, he was vice president.
		And I think they should have transparency for that.
		I've informed the leader about that.
		And additionally, I demand transparency from Democrats.
		Who went to Ukraine and attempted to force the new president, who I met and is an outstanding person who just met.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, so this is the key right here.
		And we were discussing this before we went to the last break, how basically we both believe that the president is going to be impeached at this point.
		And let me just be clear too, because there's a lot of people freaking out about myself, about Drudge, and some of the other conservative commentary out there, or just general commentary.
		They think, oh my gosh, Drudge has turned on Trump.
		Well, that's not how I see it.
		And if Drudge wanted to do that, fine, but that's not how I see it.
		Drudge, I picked up on this a couple months ago, I talked about it on the War Room, how Drudge is highlighting fake news now to blow the fake news up now to add to the hysteria, add to the hype, so that when it all comes back around, he'll be there again to shed I see what Drudge is doing was a Paul Revere-like warning call that this is real, this is serious, this is significant.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Not because the president did anything wrong, but because the deep state is willing and ready and able to double down on taking out the elected president of the United States.
		That's what he's been trying to scream at people.
		Indirectly by how he's red flagged these headlines.
		He's saying, look, this is real.
		This is happening. This is who's behind this.
		This is who's orchestrating and organizing this.
		And it looks now like they may have been trying to recreate Louis Libby Part 2.
		The modern day deep state operatives are not the most sophisticated group.
		They have a lot of power, but they're a lot like John Brennan and James Clapper.
		They lie and sort of Ridiculous ways at times.
		They perjure themselves routinely and regularly.
		They get caught in their deceptions rather easily.
		They tend to repeat the past or try to replicate the template from the past.
		They're like poor screenwriters writing a fifth version of a movie that failed after the second reboot.
		So that's who they are.
		It looks like they try to recreate Louis Libby.
		So what happened with Louis Libby is Vice President Cheney's chief of staff leaked that a person who was associated with someone attacking W's plans to go into Iraq.
		That Victoria Plume was, in fact, an ex-CIA agent, an undercover CIA agent.
		That was a federal crime.
		That led to Patrick Fitzgerald's appointment as special counsel, led to the indictment of Louis Libby, the chief of staff for Vice President Cheney.
		They may have been trying to get Trump to do the same thing, knowing how Trump likes to attack those who try to undermine him improperly or inappropriately.
		Notice Trump was very, very careful.
		He kept hinting at what might be out there.
		He said, I think they'll be surprised at who this whistleblower is, who they're connected to, what they're about.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Which we don't know. They're saying CIA, the lawyer for the whistleblower denies it, who you were pointing out in the break, also speaks Ukraine.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, the lawyer's involved.
		He speaks spook and he speaks Ukrainian.
		He's connected to both very deeply.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, you've got to be able to translate when you're laundering.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		The New York Times is saying it's a CIA operative.
		That this whistleblower is.
		So it's not just Breitbart now.
		It's the New York Times confirming it.
		And given the president's very careful comments that we just showed just at the beginning at the top of this episode, at the top of this aspect of the show, shows he's being deliberately careful.
		He's saying, please pay attention to who this whistleblower is, but I'm not going to do anything to potentially out that individual as being a CIA rogue operative, knowing that that's how they nailed Louis Libby.
		So I think that is smart and intelligent of the president.
		He knows exactly what's going on.
		He's going to double down just like the deep state is doubling down.
		And he depends on the support of the ordinary people rallying to his cause and his base to make sure that he's not able to be taken out by the deep state.
		Because that's the only thing preventing them from removing the president is the power of re-election of the president.
		That's the only thing that's scaring them at this point.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And I guess they hope impeachment will stop that.
		And that's why they're going to move forward with it.
		Which brings me to the point I wanted to discuss.
		That forces Trump, I think, politically for his own benefit, for the benefit of America, to have to release everything.
		I would release transcripts of Obama's calls, Biden's calls, release transcripts of everything, declassify everything from the FISA memos, declassify everything from the spying on the Obama administration.
		I mean, I would just go all out.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Why not declassify everything in American history and in the current American intelligence that does not implicate an ongoing existing national security concern?
		Just declassify everything.
		Find out what we did in the 70s.
		Find out what we did in the 80s. Find out what the Clintons did in the 90s.
		Find out what rogue aspects of the W administration did in the 2000s.
		Find out all the rogue aspects of what Obama was doing in the Spygate scandal and every other scandal that we don't even know about, that we haven't heard about.
		Be WikiLeaks times two.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I was going to say, that's like Julian Assange, but as the president.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Reward the real legacy of Julian Assange.
		I mean, hopefully he releases them or gets their amnesties when the time comes.
		But there's even a better way to reward the legacy of Julian Assange.
		Do what Julian Assange was trying to do, but do it times 100.
		And that's what the president, I believe, will do if they get to the point of trying to remove him.
		You know, as I think the you remove, we re-elect strategy of the Trump supporting base makes clear to the deep state they can't ultimately prevail here.
		And that they will really be put on trial if they try to put the president of the United States on trial.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		But they've also got to be considering this as well, thinking we're going to be in a clamp.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		If they're smart. I mean, some of these guys are so rogue and so power-driven and so ego-driven, and they're a bunch of little Hillary's.
		Imagine a bunch of little Hillary's running around the CIA, running around the political hierarchy.
		Basically. Just literally, just see a little Hillary.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Just running around the FBI. Imagine a bunch of little cockroaches with a Hillary face.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, that's pretty much it. With little wings that are just sort of flapping around.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Imagine those people with the controls of the NSA, with the controls of the CIA, with the controls of the State Department.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So when we think about this spy that was behind the whistleblower complaint, I mean, if I was making odds right now, I guess my leading guy would have to be John Brennan.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, this lawyer is deeply connected to John Brennan.
		Guess who one of the last people he recently retweeted out before this CIA officer came, supposed CIA officer, came forward?
		John Brennan. I mean, that's who this guy is.
		His lawyer is a John Brennan ally.
		His lawyer has CIA ties.
		His lawyer He speaks Ukrainian, according to various third-party sources.
		His lawyer has deep ties to the whole Brennan-CIA apparatus.
		So this reads like Brennan-Spygate, Part 2, Deep State Coup, Part 2.
		It's the same sort of structure, the same sort of apparatus.
		The memorandum that's written that this whistleblower supposedly crafts and drafts reads like the steel dossier.
		It reels like the steel dossier, the sequel.
		That's all it is. It's another setup, another plant job, another frame-up of the President of the United States.
		That's why Adam Schiff had to go up there and do a fake transcript this morning.
		He lied to the American people.
		He said that here's what this transcript, here's what happened in this conversation.
		And he relays a bunch of things that never happened in the conversation that are in fact directly contradicted and refuted by the actual real transcript.
		That's why the president released it before Schiff could get up there and make up a fictional fabricated transcript.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And that's why the director of national intelligence, McGuire, said, look, if you're going to call me to testify, we're doing it publicly.
		You're not going to put me behind closed doors and then lie about what went down.
		You're not going to put me behind closed doors and engage in all of this deception and not have it— Dishonor.
		So he said, okay, fine, but we're going to do it publicly.
		And then the hearing happened today, and it was just the full display of the Democrats, just the full display of Adam Schiff and his bug eyes and how they're just—it's all a Get Trump campaign.
		That's all it is. It's just Get Trump.
		And I think the American people are sick of it.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		I think they know that.
		They know the American people want their vote to be respected.
		And their vote is not respected when the Democrats in the House try to overturn their election results repeatedly.
		When the FBI tries to overturn the election results.
		the CIA or the NSA or the deep state rogue operatives in the State Department and the various U.S. ambassadorships around the world try to undermine the United States and undermine the elected president.
		So this is nothing more than an attempt to overturn an election, nothing more than another attempt of a deep state coup, but it has the real support of the deep state and the Democrats like Shifty Schiff are unwilling to back, to stand up to the deep state and are more than willing to be their pawns and harlots and prostitute their positions of power for the sake of the Democratic Party elites and their corruption and institutional corruption and continue to collude with the deep state and foreign government actors against the
		interest of a clean elected American president being able to maintain a clean elected American government.
		government.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, look, in closing, I'm just going to say this about little, little, with a D, Adam Schiff.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know, I just wouldn't let him babysit your kids.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's for certain. I wouldn't let him babysit your pets.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, jeez. I wouldn't let him babysit a goldfish.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. I mean, that goldfish would be gong...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hey, what happened to my goldfish?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It'd be like a little rubber fish in there.
		It'd be like a fish called Wanda, right?
		Go, go, go, go, go. That's the sad scale of it, the severity of it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I just wonder if there's anything to that old little that the president puts on Adam Schiff with a D. You know, that little with a D. There's probably no significance to that at all, that bug-eyed puke.
		Well, the good news...
		Robert, is that the Democrats have totally exposed themselves.
		So the American people just have to decide what they're going to do now.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. They have to be the firewall.
		They have to be the fuel in the machine.
		They have to be the air in the lungs of the Trumpian revolution against these deep state corrupt actors who want to undermine with colluding with big tech, colluding with big media, colluding with Democratic Party elites, want to undermine American democracy.
		Keep the American Revolution alive.
		Support Infowars. Support the president.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Keep it going. I didn't even plug once this hour, folks.
		Major, massive sales.
		Black Friday comes early at Infowarsstore.com.
		Didn't even plug once. Please make up for me.
		Pay the bills around here. I blew it.
		I'm bad. Go to Infowarsstore.com and make up for my lack of plugging this hour.
joe biden ▲ ● ▼		President who believes he's above the law.
		Pursuing the leader of another nation to investigate a political opponent to help win his election is not the conduct of an American president.
		The allegation is that He blocked hundreds of millions of dollars in congressionally approved aid to another country as an allegation unless he agreed to smear a political opponent is not the conduct of an American president.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Before the wave of confusion surrounding the obvious corruption between Biden and son and a phone call President Trump made to the Ukrainian president to inquire on that corruption before the U.S. handed over $400 million to a historically corrupt nation, the socialist Democrat's princess, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, was whining that the bigger national scandal wasn't that the president wasn't impeached, It was that the Democratic Party wasn't impeaching the president.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		And now Pelosi and Schumer's true boss has made her satisfaction known.
alexandria ocasio-cortez ▲ ● ▼		I think that we all, you know, many of us, especially from districts that are experiencing the brunt of the president's decisions, have been feeling a sense of urgency around this.
alexandria ocasio-cortez ▲ ● ▼		But I think the development around the whistleblower, I think these developments are exactly, you know, where we need to be going.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Biden and company are wading into the contempt quicksand.
		Because now, Joe Biden and his son, who had zero expertise on oil and natural gas, and somehow got billions in deals from the Ukraine and China, will collectively fumble over their story as they already have from the start.
		The China investigation will ultimately involve the nephew of no less than Boston gangster Whitey Bulger and John Kerry's stepson.
		I can hear the destruction of evidence now in the Obama camp, as those transcripts between Biden and the Ukrainian officials seem to accidentally disappear.
		These two investigations will continue to waste even more taxpayer dollars and insult more of our collective intelligence.
		The one investigation looking into President Trump's phone call with the Ukrainian president back in July, which could turn out to be a royal flush for the Trump administration, I spoke to a senior administration official a short time ago who said that the White House is not just releasing the transcript of this July 25th phone call tomorrow.
unidentified		They'll be releasing other documents, including a look at what the inspector general at the intelligence community found about the whistleblower who started this whole thing.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		And the other investigation inspecting Joe Biden's public braggadocio, that he protected Hunter from a Ukrainian corruption investigation.
joe biden ▲ ● ▼		I'm telling you, you're not getting a billion dollars.
		I said, you're not getting a billion, I'm gonna be leaving here, and I think it was, what, six hours?
		I looked, I said, I'm leaving in six hours.
		If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money.
		Oh, son of a bitch.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Got fired. Not to mention, a corrupt Obama ambassador refused visas to Ukrainian officials to enter the U.S. who had evidence of the Obama administration's misconduct to give to Trump officials.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Throughout all of this, is Trump playing 3D chess?
unidentified		The two biggest takeaways, one is that Trump is still being spied upon, even as president.
		That is shocking. And if this whistleblower goes in front of Congress and testifies, it'll be fascinating to see what exposure that opens up to other members of the intelligence community that apparently did have access to these calls and shared this clearly classified information with somebody who was not read in on the conversations to begin with.
		And the final thing I keep wondering about is how long are Democrats going to circle the wagons to protect Joe Biden, who is increasingly showing himself to be a terrible candidate?
nancy pelosi ▲ ● ▼		Therefore, today, I'm announcing the House of Representatives moving forward with an official impeachment inquiry.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Meanwhile, Pelosi, who doesn't have the votes for impeachment, has the nerve to quote Benjamin Franklin while her do-nothing party continues to weaken its legitimacy as a party and the security of the executive office.
jon bowne ▲ ● ▼		Quoting our founding fathers as if America is blind to the attacks the Democrats have waged on those founding fathers for years.
nancy pelosi ▲ ● ▼		They asked Benjamin Franklin, what do we have, a republic or a monarchy?
nancy pelosi ▲ ● ▼		Franklin replied, a republic if you can keep it.
unidentified		We have to make sure that we can answer the constitutional call.
		The Founding Fathers were very clear.
		We have a constitutional responsibility to serve as a check and balance on an out-of-control executive branch.
		George Washington was a slave owner, and we need to call slave owners out for what they are.
		Whether we think they were protecting American freedom or not, he wasn't protecting my freedom.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		News coming up on the other side of this short break.
		I have a gay frog in the house!
		Look at him! Right there!
		Catch that gay frog.
		Somebody put him in a basket or something.
		A basket of deplorables.
		Don't worry. We're going to take care of that gay frog.
		Somebody shoo that gay frog out of the studio.
		Alright. Don't worry.
		We're capturing the gay frog right now.
		In fact, he's so elusive we can't even get him on camera.
		I mean, it's the most elusive gay frog in the history of the world that we can't even get him on one of our 12 cameras here.
		It's unbelievable. There he is!
		Look, you see that smile on that gay frog right there?
		Look at this. You thought I was joking.
		You thought I was joking.
		But I wasn't. They say gay frogs are fake news.
		I just proved them to be real news.
		Yeah. In real time, too.
		Not too many people can do that live on air.
		All right, ladies and gentlemen, having some fun here.
		We're going to open up the phone lines.
		We may actually, Alex was saying, we've got some exclusive footage from the footage from the Supreme Court hearing on the Sandy Hook case if we wanted to get Barnes back on to break that down.
		He said that's pretty crazy stuff.
		We'll take some phone calls.
		I've got a couple other news stories to cover as well, but we should have time for some phone calls coming up.
		A light, light deck of news here today.
		But at InfoWarsStore.com, we are running a special that we can't run forever.
		It may have a week or so left.
		I was told a week.
		So I would take advantage of this as soon as possible, ladies and gentlemen.
		Black Friday comes early sale.
		So what does that mean? 50% off all InfoWars Life supplements.
		That's right. 50% off all InfoWars Life supplements.
		Free shipping storewide.
		Free shipping storewide.
		And that really comes in handy, the free shipping, when you order an air filter, when you order a water filter, when you order emergency food supplies, which are also up to 50% off.
		Those are heavier items.
		Costly to ship. We take care of those shipping costs for you.
		Part of Black Friday comes early sale.
		And double Patriot points with every order.
		That can be used towards future purchases.
		Infowarsstore.com is how it's all possible.
		And don't forget about the new site, Band.Video.
		Band.Video, the new site.
		Here's what I like about Band.Video.
		It's laid out like the old YouTube layout, and we're still working on it and making it even more user-friendly, but the compatibility and the functionality of Bandai video is awesome.
		And I'm not trying to...
		Well, let me just put it like this, folks.
		When the censorship happened...
		And we had to focus all of our content onto Infowars.com, all of our live streams.
		Oh, I wonder if you hold that long enough.
		Here, let's illustrate how the multi-universe works right here.
		This is actually how the multi-universe, multi-dimensional world works right here.
		We're just going to do it in real time with Bandit video behind me, and then eventually there'll be 10,000 Owen Schroyers, 10 million if time goes on long enough.
		That's just an illustration of the multiverse.
		We're doing that in real time on Infowars, too.
		It's unbelievable. But my point is, when we got censored, we had to concentrate all of our media on Infowars.com, which is already loaded with content and news and videos and live streams and everything.
		And then we had to concentrate the traffic to Infowars.com and all the other subsections of that, which overwhelmed our servers, overwhelmed the site, and it It just kind of hurt the functionality.
		It hurt the consumer ease.
		And so we now started Band.Video, which for me, I like it to stream the shows better.
		And so it's kind of a weird thing to have to do.
		It's like, do I plug InfoWars.com slash show like I've been doing for the first two seasons of The War Room?
		Or now for season three, do I say, we're going to just plug Band.Video.
	Because it's just easier to access.
	It's easier to get the live stream.
	It's not overloaded with the thousands of news stories that our writers put out every day at Infowars.com.
	So band.video is where I suggest you go and share the links.
	They're not as censored on your email at work, on your browser at work, on Twitter and Facebook and everywhere.
	They don't have band.video in the total censorship list yet.
	So, spread those links.
	And it's just nice. It looks like YouTube.
	It kind of functions like YouTube.
	And if we can get it big enough, which we hope we can, we can really start changing things and start getting viral videos to go viral again.
	See, Inforge videos aren't allowed to go viral.
	I'm not even personally mad because there's so many great people out there that can go out on the street.
	And I imagine I'll go back out on the street when the election season heats up.
	You know, first of all, I'll probably just want to do it just for old times sake, but also part of my job.
	But there's so many great reporters out there that do it.
	I'm not even mad at the fact that I won't be able to have 10 videos on You know, or however many videos I had during the 2016 election cycle go totally viral and get millions of views.
	I'm glad I had that access then so now others can do it for 2020.
	However, it's important to get that information out there.
	It's important to get that content out there.
	So band.video is where we're putting all our stuff.
	And it's really nice.
	We're doing a five-minute recap now that we do every day.
	Because, you know, the team, my crew doesn't do enough dealing with me like a Tasmanian devil up here every day.
	We make them do even more.
	But we put a five-minute recap out every day now on band.video.
	So if you missed the whole war room, but you just want to get a quick five-minute recap, every day we put out a five-minute recap, and that's just clips of the show, clips from our guests, the topical news, and everything.
	It's at band.video.
	Ladies and gentlemen, just go to the war room tab and get familiar with band.video.
	And get familiar with how to navigate band.video and just remember to share those links at band.video because that's where, at least for me, I want to start seeing the traffic generated.
	Because Infowars.com already has its traffic.
	It already has its function. Band.video can serve a different one and ease the stress on Infowars.com.
	All right. Um...
	So much to get to. But let me do this.
	Let's open up the phone lines as I'm deciding what news I want to look at next and broadcast here.
	Let's open up the phone lines.
	Again, we may be seeing some footage from the Sandy Hook trials in the Connecticut Supreme Court.
	But let's open to the phone lines.
	And again, let's go back to this.
	Do you think the Democrats are going to impeach Trump?
	And what do you think happens if they do?
	Me and Robert Barnes discussed this in the first hour.
	We're now going to open up the phone calls to hear your opinion.
	I think they will impeach Trump.
	I think that means Trump has to release everything else that they've used to try to destroy him.
	What happens after that, I guess time will tell.
	But that's kind of what I see happening next.
	But I will say this before we go to break and we take your calls.
	Also, I've got some Epstein news and some other news, but I never give out the phone number.
	What is my deal?
	If and when they do.
	Will America totally rebuke the Democrat Party?
	Will they be successful?
	What does Trump do in response?
	We'll take your calls, 888-201-2244.
	And guys, let's do first-time callers priority today.
	Before I go to break, though, here's an individual, that total anti-Trump nutjob that I like to engage with sometimes on Twitter.
	David Leavitt. He's one of these guys that has all these followers but, like, no engagement.
	But he put something out that I thought of, and it's so true.
	Remember guys, while the President of the United States was delivering his historical address at the UN, one of the most powerful speeches by a US President of all time, while the President was doing that, what were the Democrats doing?
	They literally had a press conference, Pelosi had a press conference, saying we're going to impeach the President.
	So while the President is delivering an America First speech to the UN, something they haven't heard in decades, the Democrats run a distraction campaign, Pelosi has her fake press conference, The media covers that all day long.
	The media shows you Pelosi all day long.
	Doesn't play a clip of the president at the UN. And then what trends on Twitter?
	Hashtag President Pelosi.
	Yeah, you'd think Pelosi was the president.
	That's part of the propaganda.
	Ignore Trump kicking ass for America.
	Embrace Pelosi's treason.
	Alright, we're getting the callers lined up right now.
	Still got a couple open lines.
	888-201-2244.
	Do you think the Democrats will impeach the President?
	And then what do you think happens if so?
	We've covered most of this Ukraine news.
	So I don't want to get too involved with that right now.
	Instead, let me just smatter some other news headlines out there for you.
	The Widow McCain says the GOP is no longer the party that my husband and I belong to.
	Good! Good!
	Prince Andrew's role from the sun.
	Prince Andrew's role in Jeffrey Epstein pedo scandal is being covered up by the FBI claims ex-top cop who says he has hours of damning CCTV footage.
	Yikes. There have been a lot of rumors about a lot of footage out there going around.
	I don't give much credence to it, but I do give credence to little with a d Adam Schiff and why the president does that.
	But that's just a deep, dark secret I'm going to keep to myself.
	Zero Hedge, they're murdering my son Julian Assange's father tells of pain and anguish.
	Where is the left on Julian Assange today?
	Where are all the activists that stood up for Julian Assange for exposing the war crimes today?
	Sadly brainwashed by the media to hate Assange as he rots in a prison cell.
	Remember that poor abused child, Greta Thunberg, who they're trying to give a Nobel Peace Prize to?
	Her parents are total terrorists.
	Oh, I'm sorry. I meant anti-fascist.
	I apologize. But she's already been associated with these people.
	They claim, oh no, that's not her t-shirt.
	And then they put out a picture of her with some sideshow Bob after he just got done stabbing someone to death.
	Oh, by the way, speaking of the Clintons, huh?
	Uh, all I know is they put out some tweets saying, Oh no, Greta just borrowed the Antifa shirt.
	Yeah, there it is. Yeah, tell me that's not Sideshow Bob in the flesh.
	That's like younger Sideshow Bob.
	But like, just the deviant look in his eye.
	And they're gonna claim that was an adult t-shirt?
	I mean, these people are such liars.
	Anyway, story from Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit.
	She recorded a song for Antifa.
	Anyway, I sent you, I think, the clip, Savannah.
	The Simpsons, man, I swear.
	I swear. It's just the craziest thing.
	Is Matt Groening a time traveler?
	Is Matt Groening on a time-release DMT that can travel through dimensions of time?
	I will get access to your secret drug, Matt.
	I will see the future, Matt.
	Isn't that crazy though, guys?
	The crew is not in belief of this.
	The Simpsons predicted 9-11.
	The Simpsons predicted Trump.
	The Simpsons predicted Greta Thornburg being triggered by Trump.
	Hey. That's not it either.
unidentified		I said that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		The Simpsons have predicted all of this stuff.
		And it's not like predictions like idiocracy that comes true or basketball that comes true.
		It's like specifics to the detail.
		That's wild stuff. Yeah, 18 times.
		Some of those are debatable, but others are just wild stuff.
		Yeah, exactly.
		Okay, anyway, not to get distracted by sideshow Bob and Greta Thunberg and Matt Groening being a time traveler.
		Let's go to the callers.
		Let's go to Jared in Washington.
		Jared, do you think they'll impeach, and what do you think happens if they do?
unidentified		Well, Owen, I gotta say it's an honor and a privilege to speak with you.
unidentified		First time caller, long time listener.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, thank you for getting through today.
unidentified		So, I just wanted to first plug what I'm going through in my pantry here.
		And I'm looking at the bodies, the Living Defense, the Winter Sun, the Ultra 12, the Deep Cleanse, the Secret 12.
		Well, I got the Secret 12 and the Ultra 12.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, you've got to down that Secret 12 so that you can just use the new Ultra 12, the more powerful Vitamin B12. I know.
unidentified		I'm just staying up with the modern stuff.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, let me ask you this, because you've obviously tried a lot of the products.
unidentified		What is your favorite? Oh, I'm going to say the male Secret...
		Oh, wait, hold on.
		I got that, too. The Alpha...
		Super Male Vitality?
		Super Male Vitality.
		That one, it is the secret.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		50% off at Infowarsstore.com.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		There it is. All right.
unidentified		So, well, we got to talk about Deep State, what they're doing.
unidentified		Essentially, what they're doing is blaming everything that the left has done on the right.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, more specifically just on Trump, though.
		I mean, it's not really, you know, it's really just specifically on Trump.
		But it is wild how they've literally taken what they do and then blamed on Trump.
		Like, what are they going to say next? Trump is illegally spying on his political enemies.
unidentified		They'll probably say that next. Well, it's exactly everything that they do is, I mean, to a T, being blamed on Trump.
		And anybody that works with Trump, not just Trump himself, but Everybody that works for Trump, they're blaming everything that they do on him.
		And it's one of those things that we really are just kind of not watching the news, the news being overwhelming.
		We're in a situation where everything is too intense for most people to be able to handle.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, I can't even...
		They're not paying attention. It's like I have this problem too, Jared.
		Where I get just information overload, my engine overheats, and I have to calm down before I sputter out.
		So it is incredible.
		How can the average individual who's living their life, raising a family, working all the time, whatever, paying bills...
		Studying for college, studying to be a doctor, a lawyer, practicing law, practicing being a doctor, whatever it is.
		How do they have time to absorb this stuff?
		I mean, that's a difficult thing. And that's why I stress on myself, I get three hours a day.
		If people have three hours a day to listen to news, I want this three hours to be the most effective.
unidentified		I mean, that's my goal. And I've got to say, I'm unemployed right now.
		I lost my job.
		But it kind of...
		And it's one of those things that, another one that I want to bring up, that people are losing their jobs because of their political opinions.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Wait, are you saying you lost your job because of your politics?
unidentified		Well, no, you know, I want to say that I listen to the show and I try listening to it sometimes at work and sometimes it's a little overwhelming.
		People, like, of the lesser than can't handle it sometimes and we're stuck with Yeah, and you know what I've realized?
		You just can't listen to that.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know what I've—exactly.
		That's what it is, Jared, because here's what I've realized.
		People who have any hedging or show any weakness in support of the president or whatever their politics are will end up being bullied.
		I got picked up from the airport the other day by an individual who was listening to Rush Limbaugh and had a Trump hat on, and I just said, hey—I don't remember what I said, but it was kind of like, hey, let me see your hat or nice hat.
		And he was like, that's right.
		I was like, do people complain?
		I was like, do people complain? He goes, I don't care.
		He's like, I'm not turning off Rush.
		I'm not taking on my Trump hat.
		That's the attitude we need to have.
		Don't be bullied by these people.
		Don't be bullied by these intellectual midgets.
		Don't be bullied by these unpopular, uncool losers.
		That's all it is. Alright, two scoops for you before we bring on more callers.
		And then Bob Barnes rejoins us.
		We're going to air some exclusive footage of the court footage of the Sandy Hook Alex Jones case.
		Hillary Clinton... Folks, you can put two and two together.
		Hillary Clinton is booked for three television shows prime time next week.
		Did you see her last public appearance?
		Like, death warmed over.
		And they're about to roll that rotting corpse out on television three times next week.
		You figure out what they have in mind here?
		Also, once the Ukrainian dust is settled, the next country that's going to be outed as being involved in the coup against the president is going to be Australia with Stefan Helper and Downer.
		So it's just crazy watching these puzzle pieces fall.
		Let's go back out to the phone lines to Mick in Virginia.
		Mick, are the Democrats going to impeach Trump?
		And what happens if they do?
unidentified		Hey Owen, thanks for taking my call.
		Love Infowars, Thor.com products.
		Rainforce, Ultra 12, TurboForce are all great.
		Just got some ChillForce, which I think we all need that right now.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, some days I need it so I don't, you know, blow my larynx out.
unidentified		Yeah. Madness going on right now, it's really necessary.
		So, I don't put anything past them.
		I think they're going to do their best to impeach him and get him out of there.
		And I don't really like to think about what might happen if that does happen.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I have a couple of comments.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Is that because you're afraid that there might be, let's say, violence?
unidentified		There's going to be a lot of people very unhappy.
unidentified		I don't want to...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, I mean, let's just call it how it is.
		I mean, let's just call it how it is.
		We're not calling for violence here, but I wouldn't be surprised if people got violence if they impeached the president.
		I mean, that's wide-open treason, man.
		That's what I'm saying. It's like... They can sit here and Beto can sit here and bitch and complain or whatever, or AOC can whine about people, you know, threatening her or whatever, which I'm not endorsing, but it's like, look, you're calling to take the guns!
		You're calling to end free speech!
		You're calling to end our sovereignty!
		You're calling to open borders!
		You're calling to de-industrialize!
		You're a freaking enemy of the people!
		Like, what do you expect?!
		It's like, oh wow, we're an enemy of the deep state.
		We're an enemy of the globalists.
		They censor us. They lie about us.
		They try to shut us down. I'm not surprised!
		Excuse me, I probably need some chill force.
unidentified		They keep doing what they're doing because they keep getting away with it.
		They're not going to stop doing it because they keep getting away with it.
		Most Americans don't have any idea what's going on, or a lot of Americans don't.
		And if they do, they don't care.
		So here's my question.
		At what point do we call for a march on Washington, specifically the House?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I would say this.
		I would say this. If they do—well, when they do impeach the president, there will be a million-man march on Washington at least, and that will happen organically.
		And it might be the first event ever that actually unites conservatives.
		So that could be an interesting phenomenon.
		Thanks for the call, Mick. Let's go to Daniel in New Mexico.
unidentified		Go ahead, Daniel. Appreciate you quite a bit.
		I listen to you guys all the time.
		I just wanted to say that, yeah, I believe they're going to really try hard and they keep on trying.
		But, you know, I think they're just trying to get this, you know, impeachment.
		But if it does happen, me and everybody I talk to are ready to stand up for them.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know what I mean? No, that's what I'm saying.
		They'll... And again, we're not calling for violence here.
		No, no. But there'll be a million-man march on Washington.
		It'll be instinct.
		America's not dead yet.
		There's still a fighting spirit left in this country.
unidentified		You know, and I was here at the rally in Rio Rancho, and I saw a comment saying, oh, they paid all those Hispanics to go out there and watch them.
		Dude, I lost money.
		I didn't go to work that day.
		I work on commission, and I make quite a bit of money.
		And I didn't just go over there for nothing.
		I went over there to see the president of the United States.
		The man that's handling this shit down.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They have people...
		Sorry, we gotta dump that.
		Sorry about that, Daniel. We can't curse here.
		They have people that stand outside of a Trump rally.
		Old ladies, like 80, 90.
		They stand outside for days.
		And then they get in and they pass out because they haven't even eaten in two days because they've been waiting to see the president.
		It's crazy stuff. Oh, but, you know, hey, he's down in the polls to Biden who, you know, couldn't fill a shoe.
		All right, who's next here?
		Let's go to Brian in Wisconsin.
unidentified		Go ahead, Brian. Hey, thanks for having me on.
		I've been listening to Alex since 2009.
		I've been listening to you since you've been on.
		This thing is getting out of hand.
		It's getting crazy. I mean, I went back to the 2016.
		We were in Green Bay, and Hillary came, and we came to counter-protest against her.
		We didn't stand a chance. They came and ripped everything down.
		The police did nothing. You know, with this whole thing that's going on, it's going to get out of control real quick.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, and here's what I wonder what the president is measuring as well.
		Because he's got, in general, the same instincts as us.
		He has to know that this is going to get out of control.
		Now, it would be in his best interest to try to avoid that from happening, but maybe he measures it differently.
		Maybe he says, alright, let it get out of control.
unidentified		I think he is. I think you're exactly right.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, they can try to blame him, but people will know it's not because of Trump.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They'll know it's the media. They'll know it's the Democrats.
unidentified		Look at the whole thing with the whistleblower.
		This whole thing proves nothing but corruption by Biden and his son.
		There's nothing to do...
		Trump did nothing wrong. But that won't even matter.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That won't even matter at the end of the day.
		Biden's not going to be the nominee anyway.
		What's going to matter is that they spent more than two years and $30 million with an anal probe on Donald Trump.
		I mean, excuse me, but they investigated for two years under his toenail, in his ears, on his hair follicles.
		I mean, ridiculous. For two plus years.
		Found nothing. No reason to impeach.
		Nothing. And then an unknown source with third-party hearsay information and then gives a story that's published in the Washington Post and that leads to impeachment within a week?
		I mean, that's going to be the story here.
		It's going to be, wow, they just wanted impeachment the whole time.
		That's what the whole thing was about.
unidentified		I remember. And that process, I mean, we're talking about completely different subjects, right?
		But it's a distraction from what's going on.
		It's a distraction again. This country is so divided, I hate to say it, but it is.
		Half the country is so far left, and the other half is so conservative.
		I have friends who are libertarians who voted libertarian in the 2016 election.
		They're going Trump.
		They're not... They're not wasting their time with this Democratic Party.
		It's crazy. It's crazy.
		Just look at their policies in general.
		This whole thing is nothing more than division, division, division, division.
		More and more and more. What they're going to get out of this impeachment in this attempt is a civil war.
		And that's exactly what they want.
		How long have we heard? That's what they want.
		Then they can swoop in and be the saviors of all things, holy and democratic.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Right? It's definitely a potential.
		Again, it's not something we want to see.
		Absolutely not. I don't think the president wants that either.
		But this is what the Democrats are pushing for.
		I did a man on the street.
		Thanks so much for the call, Brian.
		I went out with Harrison Smith.
		The Women's March.
		I don't even know what march it was.
		Some stupid march. I mean, they march for anything.
		They march for a dog turd if they think it'll stop a cow fart.
		I mean, these people are out of the way. So, I'm walking around, I'm saying, it's like they have these impeachment marches.
		I'm saying, what do you think would happen if they impeach Trump?
		And I'm telling them, I'm like, you know, that could lead to a civil war.
		Like, do you want a civil war?
		They don't care. They're so driven by hatred, they don't give a damn.
		Hell, they think the world's going to end in 12 years anyway.
		I guess you might as well have a deadly bloodbath, kill half the population.
		Hell, save the planet, murder half the people.
		Of course, that's not how it's going to go.
		The Democrats, though, are committed to impeachment.
		They decided they were going to impeach the president over a year ago, folks.
		That's the truth. They're just now finally moving forward with it.
chuck schumer ▲ ● ▼		We need the complaint.
		We need the complaint of the whistleblower as sent to the IG. It's nice to have the transcript.
		We don't even know right now if the complaint is about the transcript, in part or in whole.
		And without the complaint, we don't know what the IG thought was so urgent.
		We do not know what the whistleblower thought was so urgent.
		So simply to release the transcript is not going to come close to ending the need of the American public and the Congress to see what actually happened.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Can you believe that, dirtbag?
		Nancy Pelosi says, oh, I haven't read the transcript, so we're impeaching him.
		Chuck Schumer says, well, we don't know what the whistleblower complaint was about.
		Literally, it was about the phone call.
		That was the whole complaint.
		And then they released the transcript.
		Chuck Schumer says, the transcript isn't enough.
		I need to get deep in Trump's anus to know for sure.
		Excuse me. It's inappropriate.
unidentified		But, I mean, it's just such a joke, man.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And so... You know, we don't know what it is.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We don't know who it is.
unidentified		We don't care.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		We're coming for the President of the United States.
		We're coming for Trump. We're coming for the American people.
		We're coming for your car.
		We're coming for your kids.
		We're coming for your cities.
		We're coming for your money.
		We're coming for you.
unidentified		We're coming for your soul.
		Adam Schiff is low on souls.
		Ed Buck needs a little essence.
		Chuck Schumer hasn't sucked the life out of a child lately, so he's a little hungry.
		And Trump is trying to stop the children from being smuggled across the border that Adam Schiff and Ed Buck are gonna suck the life out of.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Fun, isn't it? Alright!
		We're taking your phone calls on impeachment.
		Let's go to Crystal in Texas.
		Do you think the Democrats will impeach President Trump?
		What do you think will happen if they do?
unidentified		Thanks so much for having me, first time caller.
		And I just want to say, I just ordered the coffee for the first time, and I love it.
		And I think y'all should really market that a lot more, because it's so good.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I know, right? We have all these great products.
		We barely even market them.
		I'm on my second cup of the Patriot Blend right now, actually.
unidentified		So good, and I am definitely a coffee snob, so I approve.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So coffee smug, so yeah, coffee Nazi approved.
unidentified		Yeah, there you go. And I was looking at the Black Friday deals, and I have a new baby on the way, and I'm wanting to get an air purifier, so I'm going to be buying one of those, too.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		It's a great deal right now. Oh, absolutely.
		What a great idea.
		Have an air purifier in your baby's room.
unidentified		Yeah, I got dogs, so I want some clean air.
		As far as impeachment, I think that the Mueller stuff just crashed and burned, and they're just desperate.
		And I feel like with the new Ukraine president and Trump, both who the deep state didn't want in office, they're freaking out because they hear this phone call.
		They probably listen to every phone call he does.
		And they're freaking out that he's right over the target.
		He is on to something here, talking about, you know, CrowdStrike and the servers.
		A lot of people are crapping their pants right now, I think, in D.C. And David Knight, this morning, he really broke down the transcripts real well.
		It was nice to get the breakdown from him.
		And I just, I don't know, other than them just freaking out that Trump's on to something here.
		I just don't see them having any legitimate evidence or reason to do any impeachment.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, that's exactly it.
		Let's say you're looking at some guy who you think murdered his wife or whatever And so you're at the house, and you're saying, hey, can we look around?
		He says, yeah, sure, look around.
		And you're looking around, and you're about to open a closet in the basement.
		He says, no! Don't go in there!
		No, no, no, you don't need to go in there!
		Don't go in there! No, no, no, no, no!
		That's basically what this is, like, oh, no!
		There's nothing here in Ukraine, Trump.
		Don't look over here. Oh, no.
		Obama wasn't spying on you.
		Don't look over here. Oh, no, no, no.
		We didn't hide Hillary Clinton's emails with CrowdStrike.
		Oh, no, no, no. Fusion GPS wasn't working with Hillary Clinton to get intelligence from Russians.
		No, no, no, no, no. It's like the same thing.
unidentified		Absolutely. Totally agree.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Don't look at the WikiLeaks emails.
		Don't look at Project Veritas.
		And don't look at InfoWars.
unidentified		So, I think they're just freaking out, and they're...
unidentified		Pulling everything they can at this point, especially right before re-election time.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They got nothing. How dare you listen to InfoWars?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Hold on, I'm going to do my best Greta Thunberg.
unidentified		How dare you?
		How dare you?
		I should be listening to...
		You should be listening to CNN, not InfoWars.
		How dare you?
		How dare you?
		How dare you buy products from Infowarsstore.com?
		How dare you?
		How dare you?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That's right. That's how you silence.
		That's how you silence people.
		You just put out a 15-year-old girl in braids and say, How dare you?
		Like, what? Thanks for the call, Crystal, and the support at Infowarsstore.com.
		Let's go to Mark in Ohio.
		Mark in Ohio. How dare you, Mark?
unidentified		How dare you? Hey, Greta.
		I mean, Owen. Great show.
		Plug for Super Metal Vitality.
		After I do my exercises in the morning, drop a full of that, I'm good to go for the day.
		Excellent product. Thank you.
		Thank you. My point is, I appreciate the research that InfoWars does about these characters that are, you know, slamming the president and, you know, they're dirty.
		Right? Mitt Romney, great connection.
		You know, with him, that kind of opened my eyes to why he's doing what he's doing.
		I want to research that a little bit more.
		But, you know, is there a way that info wars can do that for the rest of the Congress so that when the vote comes, we can demand they recuse themselves if they have their fingers in the corruption in Ukraine and are a part of it?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know, that's probably a lengthy process that might work.
		I think the president should just declassify everything.
		Just release it all.
		Just release all the transcripts.
		People can comb through it and find out what they want.
unidentified		Yeah, but there's a lot of dirty people here.
		And I appreciate, you know, what information that we've gotten, you know, through Infowars.
		It's great. And it really makes me, you know, want to research for, you know, these people like Mitt Romney.
		Why are they doing this?
		Why are they saying this?
		You know, the red flags go up on these people.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And you know what? I'm glad you said that, Mark, because I was thinking about this.
		I was contemplating this yesterday.
		Because... InfoWars doesn't need to tell you about Epstein anymore.
		InfoWars doesn't need to tell you about the deep state anymore.
		InfoWars doesn't need to tell you about the treason of Obama and the coup and everything.
		I mean, we're going to be here to do it, and we'll still do it better than anybody else, but you're actually getting this from other people on television who they want to squeeze out of TV, like Tucker Carlson.
		But Rush Limbaugh, with his audience at 3 million...
		Michael Savage with his big audience, great authors like Ann Coulter and others, and there's a lot of great personalities on Fox, but I just ask myself, where does Infowars go next?
		Because everybody's talking about, you know, supporting President Trump is not taboo like it was in 2016 when Infowars had to be, you know, breaking barriers to get people to understand, you know, hey, no, here's the real Trump, here's why you should support him.
		So I sit back and I say, do I... Do I not get sucked into the vortex of all this political hysteria?
		And do I say, hey, they're still rolling out 5G that's going to zap our brains and kill us.
		They're still putting chemicals in the water.
		There's all these other things that nobody else will talk about.
		How about the AI? I had people sending me stuff saying, and you know, look, people send me stuff all the time.
		You take it with a grain of salt. But I remember it.
		It was like a year ago. I remember it because, I don't know, it just struck me.
		So maybe it was legit. Someone sent me an email and was like, look, I work.
		I've worked inside of a major tech company.
		They put the name, I won't say it, and basically said they're already running AI experiments.
		They're already plugging wires into their brains.
		They're already testing it.
		They've already killed people trying to test it.
		So I never talked about that because, like I said, stuff you have to take with a grain of salt.
		But now that they're rolling it out, now that they're talking about putting chips in your head, putting wires in your head, you see the weird look in Tim Cook and others' eyes, maybe they've already done it.
		Maybe they've already gone there, like Alex Jones said.
		They've already gone there.
		They ain't coming back.
		They ain't coming back.
		Maybe it's more addictive than nicotine, putting a wire into your head and whatever else goes on with that.
		So... That's what I'm saying.
		It's like, this impeachment stuff, the Democrats are so out of control, the average conservative can cover this.
		So many people are now streaming up and popping up on the internet that cover this.
		Do we now go next level and say, hey, look at the 5G. Hey, look at all these other issues that are coming in the future.
		Look at the social credit score.
		Look at the facial recognition in the security grid.
		But you can't help but want to sit here and say, hey, look.
		They're committing treason against Donald Trump They're trying to remove him from office We told you that was going to happen first, didn't we?
		That's why they ban us.
		All right, coming back on the other side, we're going to get exclusive footage from inside the Alex Jones-Sandy Hook trial.
unidentified		Right now, Sandy Hook families are taking on Alex Jones at the state's highest court.
		Jones didn't appear in court today, but the families did as the free speech case against the controversial conspiracy theorists took another twisted turn.
		Fox 61's Matt Caron live outside of the state Supreme Court with an update.
		Matt. Well, today, Alex Jones' attorney, Norm Pattis, argued that Bridgeport trial judge Barbara Bellis' decision to sanction Jones for his recent comments was unwarranted.
		The First Amendment on trial.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		And they say, that's me!
unidentified		He threatened me! The Honorable Supreme Court of the state of Connecticut is now open.
		The state's highest court heard arguments in the defamation lawsuit brought by Sandy Hook family members against conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, who for years said the school massacre was a hoax.
		Alex Jones speaks in the vein of conspiracy theorists, as conspiracy theorists have spoken in this country since the founding.
		Thursday's arguments centering around alleged threats Jones made on his InfoWars internet broadcast against Sandy Hook family attorney Chris Maddy.
		We addressed it by enhancing some security around our office.
		There was no threat here.
		Chris Maddy's no wallflower.
		Whatever we've had to deal with, either me personally or as a firm, pales in comparison to the abuse that he unleashed on the people standing behind me.
		Those Sandy Hook family members declined to speak.
		Inside the court, Maddie's counterpart, Joshua Koskov's spirited exchange with Justice Steven Ecker.
		This case is a loaded case.
		Your firm brought the case against a known conspiracy theorist with a big microphone.
		And you knew that when you did that, you were getting into a war.
		The court is implying that we have to accept that if you want to bring a case against somebody that you believe is worthy of bringing a case against and it has done an injustice to you, you better think twice because you have to accept that we, as the court, are going to treat that person differently because you got what you asked for.
		And that is the implication.
		And in fact, a court should do the opposite.
		Jones made his comments following the discovery that child porn was attached to emails sent from Jones to Sandy Hook family attorneys as part of the evidence discovery process.
		...was responsible for that child pornography.
		He'd like to see that person's head on a pike.
		That is hyperbole.
		Now, the justices made no ruling today, but the trial court judge did previously rule that Jones and Pattis stonewalled the court and the defense by not producing evidence documents and handing them over.
		Pattis, meanwhile, is arguing that they did produce 57,000 emails.
		We're live outside the state Supreme Court in Hartford.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, we're going to be breaking this down.
		Robert Barnes back in the studio.
		I'm gonna be honest, Bob, I don't know if I can do this.
		And because just in that little report, there's so much misinformation and it drives me crazy.
		And I know that, I mean, I've been around long enough to know sometimes you're just better off not saying something, you know, when you're dealing with stuff like this.
		But I mean, my goodness, like the guy says, Jones has been alleging for years that no one died at Sandy Hook.
		That's not true.
		They can't produce that.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		It's the exact opposite. By the press and the public and members of the press throughout this, the political campaign being waged against Mr.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Jones, that in fact, for example, InfoWars, I did a look at it, and over 95% of what InfoWars produced or printed or discussed said that the kids died at Sandy Hook, that that was a horrible incident, that it was a terrifying incident, that the kids and the families deserve justice.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And then they say, we're going to talk about it, and then they say, oh, and they're withholding evidence.
unidentified		There's no evidence. There's no evidence.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		In fact, more was disclosed here in Discovery than has ever been done in the history of any comparable case.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And then I have to go out and I hear, Sandy Hook!
		Sandy Hook! And then they bait us into saying something about the families.
		I'm not going to say anything. People come to my door!
		People threaten my family!
		Because of liars like you!
		I mean, it's unbelievable!
		Alright, I'm going to try to... Behave myself here.
		But, oh my god.
		Oh, I don't know, man.
		This is a little too media bait for me to really get into this right now, Bob, because...
		It's just like, because I know that part of it is they want us to talk about it so that they can continue to say, see, they're talking about it.
		See, they're profiting off it.
		See this. See that.
		And it's like, I don't even want to talk about it.
		They've done enough to destroy us over this fake news.
		It's like, I don't even want to play it.
		I know they use it as bait to try to bring us down.
		They lie about it nonstop.
		I wasn't even here when any of this goes on.
		They sue me. I wouldn't even hear it when it happened.
		And I get involved in these lawsuits.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Well, I mean, the big news today was that no matter what the ultimate court decision procedurally, that every Connecticut Supreme Court justice asked meaningful, important, serious questions challenging and questioning what happened in the trial court, making clear that the First Amendment protects the right of everybody,
		including people who may be parties to a lawsuit, that you do not lose your First Amendment rights solely because you are sued, you do not lose your First Amendment rights as part of the free press, I think?
		A court has no inherent authority to violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
		And as we will be playing later in the hour, there are clips of justices from the Connecticut Supreme Court making that precise point.
		That if a part of a motive of a decision, even if it's a mixed motive, if that motive is in part to violate someone's First Amendment rights, that requires the Connecticut Supreme Court to overturn that or at least make clear that that part of the decision is legally wrong.
		So that no matter what happens, I mean, the case itself is sort of a distraction in many respects, as you point out.
		That's not going to be the lasting legal legacy of this case.
		The lasting legal legacy of this case is how the case is litigated on First Amendment grounds, what new First Amendment rights are being protected for an independent free press in America, what free speech rights are being protected for people just because they happen to be commenting on a court, just because they happen to be commenting on ongoing court proceedings, just because they happen to be commenting on litigation.
		I've received a range of death threats.
		I received bomb threats that the FBI is still investigating because of my pro bono representation of the Covington kids.
		What I didn't do is go begging to a court to stop anybody from saying bad things about me because I'm willing to be a stand-up lawyer, not be a whiner who tries to seek the misuse and abuse of judicial power like the Costco firm did in that case.
		So what we do and what we want, and no one was calling for any bad thing to happen to any of the lawyers or law firm.
		Nor is anyone calling for it now, to be clear.
		We want them to lose in court.
		We want them to lose with the judges.
		We want them to lose with the jury.
		We don't want them to be allowed to violate First Amendment rights.
		They're freely and fully entitled to pursue their political and legal agendas they see fit.
		But what they're not allowed to do is ask any court to seek to misuse and abuse its power to suppress and censor speech, which is precisely what they did in this case, and it's what the Connecticut Supreme Court questioned them on today.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm just going to say this.
		We're going to go to the footage. But it's like when I tune in to television...
		And I see Don Lemon or the rest of these clowns saying, Trump supporters are racist.
		Trump supporters are Nazis.
		Trump supporters are beating people up.
		And I just know it's false.
		I know it's inherently fake.
		I know that they're just doing that to lie and to get their political agenda.
		And so let's just say someone decided to get up in front of a Supreme Court and said...
		Infowars and Alex Jones is encouraging people to go to houses and get violent and intimidate people.
		That's just an inherent lie.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		That's completely false.
		It's a complete fabrication.
		And that is why they have not produced one incident of actually ever occurring.
		That's a total public myth.
		It's a total lie spread by those out there.
		And it's part of an ongoing campaign of libels and lies that the press is engaged in on a routine and regular basis to misrepresent, misportray, misperceive.
		And that's why what this was about today was about no matter the consequence on the case, the case is secondary.
		This is about a much bigger issue.
		This is where Alex Jones is the tip of the spear for everybody's First Amendment rights.
		Everybody is Alex Jones when it comes to this.
		There's a lot of people that have problems with what other lawyers have done.
		It is very important that we have forthright public discussion, as the U.S. Supreme Court made clear in a range of cases cited by Norm Pattis today, who made excellent, effective advocacy.
		People can go online and listen to the whole hearing if they wish, and made clear that, as a clip of a play later discloses, where Norm Pattis is talking about he often disagrees with Alex Jones.
		He often has different opinions than Alex Jones.
		But he would much rather be standing with Alex Jones' free speech rights than have any official actor, any governmental actor, suppress, censor speech, punish speech merely because that speech happens to concern another lawyer, happens to concern ongoing litigation.
		If the judge wanted to issue a gag order, she could if it was a constitutional one.
		So there was no gag order in this case, nor could there have been constitutionally within the scope that the other lawyers are talking about.
		They didn't even ask for it because they've been playing to the press every five seconds.
		So the idea that we should be silent about these cases, we should not discuss major constitutional issues, Merely because somebody is a lawyer, merely because somebody is a litigant or because someone has been sued, being sued does not deprive you of your First Amendment rights.
		You should be respectful about your criticism of other people, but the First Amendment doesn't require respectful criticism.
		It only requires that the criticism not be a true threat, that you're not allowed to falsify information in certain ways.
		But it's otherwise protected speech.
		And if you think somebody defamed you, the remedy is to sue them.
		The remedy is not to ask the court to interfere in a different case and prevent them from having their legal remedy against a different party.
		So hopefully there was many hopeful signs today from the very thoughtful and thorough questions of the Connecticut Supreme Court that went right to the heart and soul of the real issue.
		The real meat and potatoes of the issue.
		Which this is not about that case.
		This is about First Amendment rights of ordinary people when they happen to be sued in the case.
		This is about the First Amendment rights of the free press when they happen to be a defendant in the case.
		Do they lose their First Amendment rights at the courtroom door?
		Does the fact that there's a case pending in a court mean they no longer have free speech outside of that court?
		Does the fact that a case is pending in court mean they no longer have free press outside of that court?
		Because what that would encourage is a disturbing pattern.
		Well, what happened is people would deliberately sue people and sue members of the press, particularly the independent press, with the intention of silencing them, saying, hey, you know what?
		I've sued you. So now you can't talk about anything concerning me, concerning the case, concerning any issue even related to the case, concerning lawyers in the case, concerning law firm involvement in the case.
		This would be a protection for corrupt lawyers because who's going to recognize and spot Corrupt lawyers more than other lawyers in a case.
		I'm not accusing the Costco firm of being corrupt, but the speech rights implicated here would endanger the ability to expose corrupt lawyers in other cases.
		That's why it must be for years, I've argued this with judges all across the country, and said, look, it's important that parties be able to freely communicate because that gives confidence to the judiciary.
		What gives faith to our judiciary is we know that the people closest to them are meaningfully observing them, meaningly reviewing them, and meaningfully reporting them.
		If they do something wrong or incorrect in their opinion.
		When we start silencing and suppressing and punishing speech, we endanger democracy and we impair the integrity of the judiciary.
		We make our legal system look bad.
		We make our judges afraid of public discussion, afraid of public discourse.
		We don't want the message to be out there to say, hey, us lawyers need special protection judges.
		Don't let the other side say anything bad.
		People have done... The U.S. Attorney's offices have launched false criminal investigations concerning me.
		They've launched false civil audits concerning me.
		I've been subject to every kind of wrongful persecution, retaliation any lawyer has in this country.
		I don't go running to courthouses begging for special protection.
		That's part of, you want to get into the ring, be willing to get into the ring.
		So that isn't to justify and exculpate everything that's ever been said, but what it does mean is speech is a broad and wide protection.
		The lawyers should not be running to courts asking for special protection just because they're lawyers.
		Lawyers impose special obligation on us as lawyers, not special protection from speech by outsiders.
		Even people we sue have free speech rights.
		And that is what the Costco firm apparently did not learn.
		And so hopefully the Connecticut Supreme Court asked important questions today.
		Nobody wants anything bad to happen to anyone connecting to the case whatsoever.
		What we do want is a free speech and free press that's broadly fully protected.
		And that's what this is about.
		This isn't about even the lawyers involved in the matter.
		This is about free speech and free press for everybody, establishing important precedents.
		This is Alex Jones being the tip of the spear to protect everyone's rights in America.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Here's why I'm enraged over this whole thing.
		You can have dozens of news agencies run with known fake news actually for years to try to destroy America, Russian collusion, nothing.
		Alex Jones does a show questioning a Sandy Hook narrative, and his whole life is destroyed by the same fake people in the news.
		I mean, I'm enraged by that.
		Welcome back to the InfoWars.com War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com, where we have Black Friday Come Early.
		That's right, 50% off.
		It's what would normally be a Black Friday sale, just the biggest discounts that we do on Black Friday.
		We're launching it early this year.
		Black Friday comes early. 50% off all InfoWars Life supplements.
		Up to 50% off storable foods at InfoWarsStore.com are emergency preparedness kits.
		Free shipping store-wide.
		Now this is key. With free shipping, if you order a bunch of supplements that might be expensive to ship, we're going to take care of that for you.
		Part of the Black Friday sale.
		The emergency food that's heavy and expensive to ship, don't even worry about those costs.
		We'll take care of it.
		The water filters.
		The air filters.
		Heavy to ship.
		Expensive. We're going to take care of that for you, too.
		It's part of the Black Friday Comes Early specials at Infowarsstore.com.
		And just go look at some of the combo packs.
		We've got the total gut health combo pack, 75% off.
		We've got the 8-pack PowerStack supplement routine with already parceled out Supplements for the AM and for the PM. For those of you that might be wondering, well, I've been hearing about supplementation.
		I've been hearing about supplements, but I just don't know what to take.
		I don't know when to take it.
		Well, we've gotten rid of all that confusion for you.
		We put together the 8-pack PowerStack, so you don't have to think about that.
		75% off right now.
		75% off.
		Right now at Infowarsstore.com.
		So take advantage of all of these specials and, as always, stand up for free speech by getting a great product at Infowarsstore.com.
		All right. Robert Barnes in studio.
		Break down some of these clips, some of this content that we saw or that we will now see from the case in Connecticut today.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		So we have seven justices up on the Connecticut Supreme Court.
		Four of them recently ruled against the gun company in a Sandy Hook related case.
		Controversial opinion. There are three dissenting justices.
		Very thorough and thoughtful questions by all of the justices.
		A lot of them are perceived as having liberal or democratic political allegiances or alliances, and none of them are known as Alex Jones fans or supporters.
		But they did understand the importance and significance of the First Amendment questions being asked here.
		How important that is for a free press, how important that is for free speech, that the free courts require also the free press and free speech be respected by both the litigants, the lawyers, and the courts in the process.
		So we'll go to this first key, and this is one of the key questions that's recurrent throughout the process that each of the justices is asking some variation of, and this will be a simple, succinct version of that question.
		And so let's go to clip number one, and you're going to have one of the justices asking Talking about the key issue, doesn't this issue involve protected speech?
unidentified		Let's go to clip one. But if we were to find that Mr.
unidentified		Jones' statements were protected speech, could we even get there?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		So you hear that? If we were to find that Mr.
		Jones were protected speech, could we even get there?
		Could we even allow what happened here?
		Could we authorize this? Could we approve this?
		Could we be seen as signing off on something that has never been done before?
		A court using its power in Connecticut to censor someone and suppress someone and punish someone and their legal remedies in a court case because of their outside-the-courtroom speech.
		And in fact, there are famous cases involving this.
		A famous case years ago in the 1940s, Bridges, that went all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court.
		You can Google Bridges, United States Supreme Court, free speech, find out all about it.
		And there a court had issued an injunction, or was going to issue an injunction against the labor union being able to strike.
		And one of the litigants, one of the head members of the union, Mr.
		Bridges said screw that court we're not gonna do that and so that court said hey that's absolutely inappropriate I have inherent authority under the court system to not let you do that and so I'm not gonna let you do that I'm gonna punish you accordingly. It goes all the way up to the United States Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court said no court in America has the inherent inherent authority to violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
		The foundation of the Bill of Rights, the fountain of American liberty, is the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.
		That case was discussed today by the Connecticut Supreme Court, and that case is one of the cases being referenced in the question being asked.
		So let's go to another question by another justice of the Supreme Court.
		Remember, there's seven members of the Connecticut State Supreme Court, all of them today asking thorough and thoughtful, important First Amendment questions about the ramifications and implication of this case going far beyond just the case itself, going far beyond Alex Jones.
		Going to the core First Amendment rights of every American, every member of the free press, every American's free speech rights, every person's rights to comment on the court system or the lawyers, even if they happen to be sued in the case.
		In fact, they are often the best people to comment on what's happening in a case.
		They are the closest observers to a case.
		So let's go to clip number two.
		And here the court is asking, if you have a judge violating someone's constitutional rights, why doesn't that taint everything?
		Taint everything that's happening.
		And these aren't my words.
		Those are the court's words. Let's go to clip number two.
unidentified		If you have a mixed motive for something, then why would you separate that motive out if you have somebody abusing a person's constitutional rights?
unidentified		In this case, a court judge, why doesn't that taint everything?
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Have you heard that? If you have a, in this case, a judge abusing someone's constitutional rights, those rights being Alex Jones' constitutional rights, why doesn't that taint everything that's happening at that trial court proceeding?
		That's the question of a Connecticut Supreme Court justice.
		A justice widely perceived as not being an ideological or political ally of Alex Jones of the political right, but a justice who understands the value, significance, importance, and consequence of the First Amendment implications of this case.
		That is an important question, a key question, a critical question, and it is the question in this case.
		Whatever the court decides on other procedural or technical grounds, Whether some other way to affirm or approve what the trial court did, it is critical for First Amendment rights that this court enforce those First Amendment rights by saying what happened at the trial court proceeding in regarding the speech was wrong.
		Let's go to another clip where another justice is asking the same question on the same variation.
		And what they're talking about is mixed motives.
		So a lot of people hear about mixed motives in employer civil rights cases.
		That's where an employer is like, well, I don't like this person because of their race.
		I don't like this person because of their gender.
		I don't like this person for some impermissible reason.
		But, you know, they're also incompetent.
		They're also bad at their job.
		They also made a mistake. So even though part of the reason why I'm firing them is because of the color of their skin or their race or their ancestry or their religion or their gender, or because they didn't go along with sexual harassment or something else, I'm also going to fire them.
		I have a legitimate motive, too, because heck, they did screw something up.
		And what the courts have always said is we cannot allow those cases, we cannot allow an employer to do that.
		That's still impermissible, invidious discrimination against the civil rights laws of America.
		That even if you have a legitimate reason, if an illegitimate reason, in the words of the other Connecticut Supreme Court justice, taints the decision-making process, it is important not to allow, authorize, or approve that action.
		So the logic of Mr.
		Norm Pattis, the counsel for Infowars, and Mr.
		Jones in the case, as he very effectively and advocately and passionately argued today, is that in a mixed motive situation, we cannot approve or authorize, least of all a judge, doing such illicit actions in conduct.
		So let's go to clip number three, where the court talks about the problems of an unconstitutional motive.
unidentified		And so when there are two reasons, in a mixed motive analysis, I think under Mount Healthy in those cases, if the unconstitutional motive is in there, then you lose.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, we'll be right back with more.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		Here you hear it. If the unconstitutional motive is in there, you lose.
		He's referring to the people challenging or trying to get the trial court to approve.
		He's telling the firm that's trying to get the sanction order authorized and approved, you lose if there was any unconstitutional motive that was any part of the process.
		That's the right legal analysis.
		Another thorough and thoughtful question by seven justices today, all of whom communicated thorough and thoughtful questions in the oral argument concerning the case about this important issue, precedent-setting issue of free speech in this country, free thought in this country, free press in this country, including in the context of the legal system, including in the context of disputes within the courthouse when the speech is made outside the courthouse.
		So let's go to another clip.
		And here's Norm Pattis disclosing and sort of summarizing what the core issue is at the end of the case, at the end of the oral argument, where Norm is explaining that he often disagrees with Mr.
		Jones. He has strongly different opinions than Mr.
		Jones. We're good to go.
		The ability to be an effective advocate for anybody, for any idea, in the courthouse of ideas, in the public marketplace of ideas, is to have fully protected free speech.
		And that the far greater threat is not someone with whom you disagree, but is any actor of the state, any officious action, which is just a fancy phraseology for official action, is officious action, which you'll hear him use a reference to in his dialogue and his speech in the quote coming up.
		is a far greater threat to free speech and free thought and free press for everybody in America.
		So let's go to clip number four and hear Mr.
		Pattis speak in his zealous advocacy for the First Amendment today in the Connecticut Supreme Court in a case brought by Alex Jones.
unidentified		In practical terms, what did you really lose here by this sanction?
		A lot. Enormous expense and aggravation.
		And now we get to go through the discovery gauntlet all again against claims that we think are fundamentally frivolous.
		The claim is that Mr.
		Jones' speech caused others to act.
		To intimidate the Sandy Hook families.
		That issue, the proximate cause issue there, is not worth the time it takes to litigate.
		They raised this unusual cut book claim that you can silence a person who says what you don't like because he sells products independent of any relationship of the speech to product.
		That case is not worth the time it takes to litigate.
		There is nothing about this case that has merit.
		And I don't know why Mr.
		Jones should be required to undergo the expense of this litigation when his view is, and I share it, the stated objective here is to silence a man who is, quote, notoriously bad.
		I mean, what was that? This is an attempt to silence speech, which is exactly what the legislative history and Representative Tong's remarks said the anti-slap provision was for.
		Mr. Jones is unpopular, but he says things I often disagree with.
		Prior to getting involved in this case, I never paid much attention to him.
		I look at him now. I don't always agree, but I would rather have him at my side in almost any circumstance than an officious intermedaler who's going to tell me I'm notoriously bad because they don't like what I say.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		And that's what he means. And what he means by officious intermeddler is the state government actor, someone, in this case, a courtroom, a courthouse, a court using its power, as the trial court did, to suppress, censor, and punish speech.
		That's what's so dangerous.
		The court's opinion, and we're not questioning and criticizing the court itself, we're criticizing the opinion, we're criticizing the action, we're criticizing the officious intermeddler who's interfering and impairing free speech and free press in America.
		That's what the Supreme Court petition was all about.
		The Connecticut Supreme Court almost never takes these kind of cases.
		And yet here they did. They took this rare, extraordinary, exceptional action because they recognized the constitutional consequence of this case.
		That if this is allowed to be affirmed, if this is allowed to be upheld, If this sanction is approved of under the terms promoted and propagated by the court and by the advocates and by members of the press concerning it, then nobody has any free speech or free press when it comes to any ongoing court proceeding in America, particularly those who have been sued.
		You can sue someone into censorship, sue someone into denial, into suppression of their First Amendment fundamental rights and liberties.
		That's why this case is so critical, so essential, so fundamental to First Amendment rights and liberties to this country.
		And that's why Alex Jones is willing to be the front of it, willing to be the face of it, willing to be the brunt of it, taking all the hits for everyone else, as he's been doing for the better part of two decades as a leading member of the independent free press in this country.
		So that is why this case is so consequential.
		You'll see members of the media try to drag it into something else, try to talk about discovery disputes, try to talk about Sandy Hook.
		Try to talk about anything.
		Try to talk about the lawyers involved.
		Try to talk about some of the politicians involved.
		That's not what the case is about.
		This case is about the First Amendment.
		Does it apply to people who've been sued?
		Does it apply even when you make statements that other lawyers don't like?
		Does it apply even if the court is the one that's taking the action that suppresses, censors, or punishes speech?
		And because it has to.
		If it doesn't, then we've created a truck-sized loophole that would gut the First Amendment freedoms in this country for both free press and free speech for all Americans.
		That is why the case is so fundamental, so critical, so essential.
		And the decisions that come out of this court case are going to be important.
		But just the critical questions the court was willing to ask today is a great step forward for the protection of the First Amendment in the United States.
		States, they showed a thoughtful court, a thorough court, a competent court willing able to recognize the importance and significance and consequence of their decisions and actions and how precarious this precedent may be if allowed to stand.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		You know here's what is probably gonna happen too.
		It won't even matter the result of this.
		It could be total victory for free speech and Alex Jones here.
		And I'll still hear the numbnuts coming up to me say, Alex Jones and Sandy Hook and lost his kids and threatened people.
		And it's just like, oh, gee.
		Because they won't report on this.
		They'll report on... Alex Jones sued by Sandy Hook families, and then that's all they'll report on, and then they'll never report on the result.
robert barnes ▲ ● ▼		There will be continued efforts by the press and the politicians to lie and libel Alex Jones, and that's why we're seeking remedy by suing the Young Turks who did so, seeking remedy by suing Brianna Wu, have letters out that more lawsuits will be coming,
		including against Market Watch if they don't correct within the next 30 days, including against other Market Watch is a subdivision of Dow Jones, which is a We're good to go.
		A hundred years from now, a lawyer will be citing the questions these judges asked.
		A lawyer will be saying, hey, you cannot do this.
		And maybe it'll be some small person, some little small newspaper operation in a small town somewhere in rural America.
		Maybe it'll be some little person who's been sued who doesn't have a lot of means, doesn't have a lot of resources, but they've heard about Alex Jones, and they've heard about the First Amendment, and they've heard about his Connecticut court, and they can get these public records from right online, and they can cite to them themselves.
		Maybe they're representing themselves.
		And they can say, Alex Jones, in this case, established, listen to these judges' questions.
		Listen to these justices' questions.
		Many of them Democratic judges.
		Not politically aligned with Alex Jones.
		They're not big, prominent supporters of Alex Jones.
		These are independent, thoughtful justices saying, hey, this is First Amendment rights.
		Asking, but if we were to find that this was protected speech, doesn't that resolve the issue?
		Asking, if a judge violated someone's constitutional rights, why doesn't that taint everything?
		Asking, when there are two reasons in a mixed motive analysis, if the unconstitutional motive is there, then you, the unconstitutional actor, lose.
		So that is the importance of these questions.
		These questions will last long before they can continue to smear Alex Jones all they want.
		We will fight back in the court of public opinion.
		We will fight back in the courts of law.
		We will fight back in the courts of appeals.
		We will fight back in the Supreme Courts of the country, including the Supreme Court of the United States.
		But it is the audience that Their rights are going to be protected because of the willingness and readiness of Alex Jones to be the front of this, and that is why their critical support of InfoWars is the fuel that protects against all of this, is the fuel that energizes it.
		The last independent free press of this scale and size in America is InfoWars, and it stays alive and afloat because you, the ordinary people, support it.
		If you want to know more about these cases, you can go to FreeAmericaLawCenter.com.
		If you want to really support InfoWars, make sure it stays alive, then make yourself healthier, make yourself wealthier, make yourself wiser, change yourself, change the world, go to InfoWarsStore.com and you can do that.
		Buy products you want, buy products you need, buy products you like at a cheaper price than you can get anywhere else.
		It's the easiest, best way to get healthier, wealthier, and wiser in America today.
		And you're protecting the First Amendment, as the Connecticut Supreme Court made clear today.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, I'm going to do a news blitz here and get to some of these clips that I haven't yet.
		We've covered the Ukraine gate issue.
		I didn't get to this story, but you can find it on Grabian.
		I'll link to it in my press release as well.
		On Subscribestar.com slash Owen-Schroyer if you want to find that link.
		I'll be linking to that tonight when I put out my press release.
		86 things Democrats have said Trump could be impeached for.
		But we've kind of gone through the whole Ukraine gate madness of the Democrat Party, so I want to get these clips in, so I'm going to move on here.
		Two, Israel General warns it is approaching level of war with Iran as tensions rage.
		It's from the Daily Star, so the tensions in the Middle East still raging as Netanyahu and Israel's future is in the balance.
		Ex-U.S. intelligence officer gets 10 years in Chinese espionage case.
		We covered that.
		That decision has been made.
		That story is on Reuters.
		AP. Afghan officials claim 40 civilians killed in anti-Taliban raid.
		This is not a good one here. Didn't get much play.
		But they're saying it was U.S. airstrikes.
		They're saying it was NATO airstrikes, which are essentially...
		U.S. airstrikes.
		And it's no reason nobody wants to claim this because it killed 40 civilians.
		And guess what else has hit? A wedding.
		A wedding. Remember when Obama had those weddings get blown up too?
		So I just think this stuff needs to stop.
		The U.S. just needs to get out of the Middle East.
		Oh! K. Hand gesture and bull cut added to hate symbols database.
unidentified		The bull cut! The bull cut.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, we expected the okay hand symbol.
		They've gone totally insane, thinking that means white power.
		But now the bull cut is considered a hate symbol.
		I really don't understand that.
		A haircut is now considered a hate symbol.
		Oh my gosh.
		And then they put out a story and they'll say, white supremacist Neo-Nazi threatens—oh, there's Kaepernick doing the white power symbol.
		White supremacist neo-Nazi threatens to shoot up church or something like that, and it'll just be a deranged individual that has a picture of, like, a Confederate flag or has a picture of a gun, and now they just label that as white supremacist neo-Nazis when it could just be a guy that has Southern pride, rebel pride. But that's what they've done now.
		And so that makes it easier for them to steer the narrative and blame white supremacy, blame neo-Nazis or whatever, white people, when this is just mundane symbolism that they're just attributing to something that doesn't actually exist.
		Look at this from...
		I don't know who this is, but it illustrates perfectly.
		I think this girl has, if I remember correctly, 20 million followers on Twitter.
		She says... She posts the Greta Thunberg video and she says, Hear her speak.
		Think about what she's saying.
unidentified		Climate. Change.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Is. Real.
		So that's how they do it, folks.
		They just put a girl up there, a 15-year-old girl who rants and raves, you know, because they have so much science that proves climate change is real.
		They just have a 16-year-old girl ranting and raving, and then they say, see?
		That proves it! That proves it!
		It's like, what? Yeah, because see, the science with Al Gore and his fake documentary failed.
		And so now they just try emotion.
		And oh my gosh, look at me.
		I saw her speak.
		Therefore, climate change is real.
		Alright. Here's one of the most notorious racists on Twitter.
		Anti-white racists.
		It just shows you the mind gymnastics these people are trying to play to deal with reality now.
		And by the way, this is one of those accounts that has like a ton of followers and gets zero followers.
		Zero interaction. You gotta wonder how they have all this huge follower count.
		They can't get any interaction.
		By the way, I'm gonna put this out today because it's been bothering me so much.
		I finally decided to document this.
		I get hundreds of new followers every day.
		My Twitter account never goes up.
		So I decided to finally document that today.
		I'm gonna put those tweets out later.
		I've gained more than 200 followers today.
		My follower count hasn't gone up one.
		But this guy's got millions of followers, I think.
		How many followers does this guy have?
		Can't even get 50 likes on a tweet.
		But I'm sorry, here's the content.
		The Democrats were conservatives when they started the KKK. They are liberals today.
		If you're against the KKK, you wouldn't support conservatives.
		I mean, what?
		Just imagine the mental gymnastics these people are doing.
		This guy has over a million followers, can't get 100 likes on a tweet.
		It's what you call fake inflated follower counts, where my follower count gets deflated and shut down.
		And I've been following it today, because it's just so stupid.
		Because I really don't even care, but it's like, if I'm going to claim something, I'm going to document it.
		So I took all the screenshots, all the people that followed me, and follower count didn't go up.
		But this guy has over a million followers, can't get 60 likes on a tweet.
		Doctor performs abortion on the wrong woman, and now, of course, there's outrage over this.
		Rightfully so. But I thought it was just a clump of cells, so what's the big deal?
		Mattel launches new line of gender-neutral dolls.
		Cool. Women's magazines are more progressive than ever, and they're all closing down.
		I've said this multiple times.
		Patriotism sells.
		Nationalism sells.
		People are starting up whole companies based off of Trump and his presidency.
		That sells. Fake liberal progressivism shuts the doors.
		Nobody wants that crap anymore.
		Look at Chick-fil-A. I think it's the number one fast food chain in America.
		It's like a parking lot every time you go to a Chick-fil-A. China's new 500 megapixel super camera can identify thousands of people simultaneously, and it can identify one person in a crowd of thousands of people.
		Nothing to see here.
		Alright, let's go to some of these clips now, guys.
		First, let's go to Cory Booker!
unidentified		Cory Booker!
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		A presidential candidate with, I think, 1% approval, maybe zero.
		It was deplorables in 2016.
		Cory Booker has now given the libelous and slanderous term to Trump supporters for 2020.
		Here's Cory Booker coining the next phrase.
unidentified		I've been saying this from the beginning of the Trump administration.
		Those people who are enabling him Who assuage their conscience, witness the kind of things he does on a regular basis.
		And we've heard the reports, I've heard you reporting the kind of things this person does to moral vandalism in that office.
		Those people that are enabling him, there is a cold, frigid place under the historical eye.
		They will go down in history as despicable actors who have enabled one of the presidents who's doing some of the worst things to that office in the entire history of our country.
		Like what? That is why we will defeat him in 2020 if he is still there.
		But these people, I have a very low regard for people who know he's doing wrong but still enable him to defend him and in many ways empower him to remain in that office.
		Senator Cory Booker, thank you.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, this is a bad president.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		He does a lot of bad things. It's like, what?
unidentified		What, Booker?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		This is what they do. They sit on television and they just say, the president's bad, he's a racist.
		All the things he's done, all the things I've seen, all the reports out there, there's nothing.
		But the average IQ that would watch an MSNBC show or a Lawrence O'Donnell, they just don't get it.
		They can't understand context.
		They can't put together context.
		They don't even have the mental capacity to get context.
		It's all one-dimensional, first-layer thinking.
unidentified		Oh, Cory Booker just said president despicable and bad, and Trump supporters are going to be on bad side of history.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Trump racist. I'll go make a sign.
		But you notice, Lawrence O'Donnell, oh really, Mr.
		Booker, what is it that the president has done exactly that is so bad that you have noticed nothing?
		What is he going to say, Russian collusion?
		It's fake news. What is he going to say, Ukrainian collusion?
		It's fake news. I mean, it's all fake news.
		But they just sit on television and say, yeah, he's despicable, and the eye of history will view him negatively.
		You know what, Corey? I have a weird feeling that the eye of history is going to view you negatively.
		And I don't know what it is that you have hiding in your closet that you have to come out as a total dirtbag fraud deceiver here.
		But maybe you and Adam have something in common.
		Besides your bug eyes.
		Maybe there's something else that you guys have in common.
		Maybe you guys like to bugger something that's in common.
		You sick freaks.
		Alright, that's going to do it for the war room today.
		Remember folks, InfoWarsStore.com.
		Huge sales happening now.
		50% off all supplements.
		Free shipping store-wide.
		You stay classy, InfoWarriors.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		September is almost over and right now we're offering store-wide free shipping, double Patriot points, and 50% off for a limited time.
		As a lot of you know, I don't play by the establishment's rules.
		In fact, I like to hijack things they've created and turn it towards the use of the people and the information war.
		And we're doing that right now with The Big Game Changer.
		We're going to bring you real Black Friday prices months early in late September and early October.
		It's going to run as long as supplies last across the board, at least 50% off, store-wide, free shipping, double Patriot points.
		And more. We've not done this, ladies and gentlemen, since last Christmas.
		But I want you to take advantage of this.
		We need funds to run our operations.
		So it is a win-win.
		We're going into 2020. InfoWars needs the funds.
		Plus, these are great products.
		Go take advantage of them right now at InfoWarsStore.com or InfoWarsLife.com or 888-253-3139.
		My fellow freedom lovers, I'm very excited to bring you Vaso Beets.
		I've been wanting a beet formula for years because they're popular, they're best sellers, because people like them and they really work.
		It's on record that beets are good for healthy liver, help support athletic performance, supports healthy blood vessels, the list goes on and on.
		Cardiovascular and heart health supports one of the biggest, what's called Vaso Beets.
		Help support the body's natural nitric oxide production.
		Oh, that is the biggie.
		Well, guess what, ladies and gentlemen?
unidentified		Vaso Beets is a concentrated beet extract.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		You'd have to eat a lot of beets to get what you get in each dropper full of this.
		Take it out of the tongue so you absorb it into your bloodstream.
		Get Vaso Beets today, our latest product, at InfoWarsLife.com and take care of yourself, take care of your family.
		It's great for all ages.
		And support the Infowar in the face of the globalist.
		VasoBeats at InfowarsLife.com.

▲