Owen Schroyer and Roger Stone expose the Middle East’s instability near Syria’s border, where Israeli airstrikes hit Iranian forts and Hezbollah/ISIS operate. They contrast this with U.S. media’s racial/political double standards—like Preet Bharara’s selective prosecution of Dinesh D’Souza ($6M Club for Growth spent opposing Trump in 2016) while ignoring worse Democratic offenses. Stone’s legal battles, including a $7M frivolous lawsuit and Facebook censoring Georgia candidate Michael Williams, highlight systemic bias against conservatives. Viral examples—like Tyler White’s ejection for an Infowars shirt or Maxine Waters’ baseless Russia collusion claims—underscore the left’s manufactured outrage and refusal to debate facts, revealing a broader pattern of hypocrisy and media manipulation. [Automatically generated summary]
Alright, so tensions have reached a, well, a tipping point in the Gaza Strip.
We're going to talk about all that on the other side.
This is The War Room.
Don't go anywhere.
It is Monday, May 14th, 2018.
15.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Owen Schroyer.
Let's get a doc cam, please, to look at the stacks and stacks and stacks of news I have today.
Now, one of these stacks I'm not even sure if I want to get into because it's a bunch of race baiting and...
Here's what happens to me every time I go down this road and I cover the racial divide or I cover the race baiting of the left and of the Democrats is I step back and I'm just like, why are you even talking about it?
Just by talking about it, you're giving the race baiters and the race pimps what they want.
And then are you solving anything or are you adding to it by even talking about it?
So I don't even know if I'll get into it, but it's the same nonsense.
And then you have, to culminate the madness of it, Shadwick Boseman, who is the actor, the Black Panther, does the Howard graduation, does a speech, and at the end of it he does the Wakanda forever salute.
It's a fake nation.
It doesn't even exist.
And here he is virtue signaling to African Americans over a fake country instead of America.
Which is the country that gives them all the opportunity.
And he sits here and gives a Wakanda salute.
A made up country.
So this is the kind of crap that is just like, wow.
And it's like, but do you even talk about it?
Or do you just ignore it? So I've got a stack of that crap.
Maybe I'll get to that. A bunch of liberal madness.
That's not even the stack of liberal madness.
That's just the stack of race baiting.
This is the stack of liberal madness.
So maybe we'll get into that.
But then the big news is what's going on in Israel right now, what's going on in the Gaza Strip, and the fallout from the Iran deal, which I'm sick of even calling it Iran deal.
There was no deal.
The deal was never signed.
Iran said they didn't want the deal in 2015.
Congress said they didn't want the deal in 2015.
Obama didn't even sign an executive order.
This was called an executive policy policy.
And the State Department in November 2015 wrote a release on the most updates, the last update from the quote-unquote Iran deal.
There was no deal.
There was no signature by Iran.
There was no congressional approval.
There was literally zero support for it.
Do you understand? There was zero support outside of what?
Obama's office. That was it.
Iran didn't want the deal.
Congress didn't want the deal.
Nobody wanted the deal except Obama and Kerry.
Why? Oh, and just like I was alluding to last week, now it comes full circle and the story's going everywhere.
Here's the headline from Zero Hedge.
Iran threatened to name politicians who took bribes to pass nuclear deal.
There was no deal.
In fact, here's my challenge today, because I've got people that are still fighting me tooth and nail on this.
I challenge anyone, anybody, to find me the Iran deal.
Find me the deal.
Find me the actual documents signed.
Show me the deal. Show me where there is an official deal with Iranian signatures on it.
I'm dead serious.
I can't find it.
And so I, after...
Diving into this all last week, trying to make sense of it, I always land on the same conclusion.
It doesn't make sense. There's something behind this.
Most likely, we'll never know.
Unless that is, Iran is not bluffing and they are actually going to name politicians who took bribes to pass a nuclear deal.
Now, I liked Alex's spin on this from yesterday's broadcast where that's basically Iran blackmailing the deep state saying, you better do something about Trump.
You better do something about this pro-Israel policy or we're going to out you.
So, you know, that's Iran blackmailing former Western politicians behind the Iran deal.
Of course, this is all convoluted and concocted because let's not forget John Kerry, who went to Iran and had a secret meeting with the Iranians stabbing America in the back.
Then he goes to Paris and has another meeting with the Iranians stabbing America in the back.
So this has all been concocted and convoluted.
The question now is.
Is Iran bluffing?
Or will they really name names behind the Iran deal of people that receive bribes?
Go back up to that story real quick, guys.
So, yeah, this is a perfect talking point.
The New York Post has the headline, we don't owe Iran that $1.7 billion ransom payment.
Well, it was $150 billion.
The Democrats claim that that was their funds that we were essentially withholding because of Because of sanctions, which really doesn't even make sense.
You're not withholding that.
You're just... Again, none of it makes any sense.
None of it makes any sense. So, my big question on it is, is Iran bluffing when they say they're going to name names of people who took bribes in the Iran deal, or are they serious?
And what advantage is that to Iran?
See, again, you have to ask these questions to try to get down to the root cause.
None of it makes sense.
So if none of it makes sense, you either A, follow the money, which is 99% of the time the thing to do, or B, there's an underlying issue that we don't know about it.
So that's probably slowly developing here, and we'll see what happens.
But again... Remember, Trump says that John Kerry meets possibly illegally with the Iranians over the Iran deal, which I challenge any member of this audience to show me the deal.
Show me the documents. Show me the Iranian signatures.
Show me anything. I'm serious.
You can't even do it. The Iran deal might be the biggest fake news story ever in that it never existed.
There was no deal.
And then you have people even calling it a treaty.
There was no treaty. I just call things as they are.
I don't put spin on things.
So for example, let's digress now and move on to what's going on in the Gaza Strip.
I don't live in Israel.
I don't live in Palestine.
I have no seemingly personal interest in that situation.
So I sit here and I say, Well, why doesn't Israel have the right to decide where their U.S. embassy is?
Why doesn't Israel have that right as a sovereign nation?
Okay, I'd say they do.
The U.S. in turn also has the right with Israel to decide where it goes.
Trump made a promise.
Trump came through. Israel happy.
America happy. Promise fulfilled.
Well, wait a second now.
Now you've got these Palestinians and then you've got Other nations, you can throw Iran in there, that are backing people that are anti-Israel and that are causing terrorism at the border.
Now, is Israel perfectly innocent?
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying let's look at all the angles here.
Why did you have...
Guys, see if you can find this.
Was it a Palestinian leader or it may have even been an Iraqi or Iranian leader that said...
Charge the border and cross the fence.
And I covered the story and I'm like, what are you saying?
So you just want people to go barge into Israel and do what?
Start fighting people with sticks and stones?
They're going to get killed. And then what happens?
They rush the fence, they rush the Gaza Strip, and they get killed.
Now, again, I'm neutral on the thing.
I think all parties involved are wrong.
Why are you going to the Gaza Strip and protesting?
Protesting what? What, are you going to settle there?
Are you going to go settle in that land?
Are you going to go build a home there?
Are you going to build a city there?
No, you're not. You're not going to do that.
You're just out there doing what the media is telling you to do.
So you fall for propaganda.
But then you have the Israeli soldiers that are actually literally sitting there picking people off, sniping people, dropping tear gas bombs via drones.
And it's like, well, I don't support that either.
So why is there all this madness?
But you know what it really is?
It's because there's been so much confusion.
There's been so much fake news.
There's been so much foreign meddling.
There's been so many ulterior motives, whether it be for oil or central banking.
And so there's so much confusion.
There's so much fake news.
There's so much tribalism in that area that it's just all coming to a head now.
And I think Trump did this on purpose with the Iran deal and the embassy in Jerusalem just to have this all fall apart now so that he can move on quickly.
You know what I just thought of, guys, as I'm sitting here contemplating how to cover what's going on in the Gaza Strip right now?
Because, you know, I...
I just want to come at it from a neutral perspective.
But if you say something that is looked at as pro-Israel, then it's like, oh, you're pro-Israel.
They're the worst. They're killing people.
And then if you say something that's anti-Israel, it's like, oh, you're anti-Semitic.
You hate Israel. Everybody wants to kill them.
And it's like, can I just cover something that it is?
It just is? Like, I'm just covering what is?
And can you not put me in a box?
It's one of the most frustrating things about doing this.
And then I'm thinking, have you guys ever seen the movie You Don't Mess With the Zohan?
You guys know this Adam Sandler movie?
It almost is like it all comes down to that movie where the people in Israel and Palestine are fighting with each other and they hate each other and then they don't even know why.
And then they come together and they're like, why are we even fighting?
We don't even know why. And it ends up being because of some, essentially, proxy war funded by the West.
And you could say that that could be the case here, but it's funded by Iran, it's funded by Israel, it's funded by all of them.
They're all doing the same things.
And it's just totally out of control.
And maybe that's Trump's angle here, is like, look, this is so out of control, the only way to do this is to just blow it up diplomatically, blow it up politically, which is basically what he's done now.
With making Jerusalem the embassy, declaring it the Capitol, And with ending the quote-unquote Iran deal, which I put out a challenge, if anybody can actually show me the Iran deal, show me the documents, show me where Obama signed it, show me where the Iranians signed it, show me the list of all their demands, show me an Iran deal, show me that document, because I'm yet to see it.
And all of this coverage, all of this outrage, who has actually referenced the document?
Bueller? Bueller?
No. So that's going to be an interesting thing.
But let's first go to Sarah Sanders.
She is the ice queen.
Sarah Sanders is the ice queen.
Listen to her response from, I think it was a CNN pundit.
I'm not sure who this girl is, but she's always in the White House gaggle asking left-leaning questions.
Listen to Sarah Sanders' absolute roast to the Iran deal.
unidentified
Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, and former President Barack Obama all weighed in on the President's Iran decision.
A sampling of what they said, John Kerry, was it weakens our security, breaks America's word, isolates us from our European allies.
President Obama, former President Obama said that Called for principled, fact-based, and unified leadership that confessed to our country.
And then Hillary Clinton said, our credibility is shot.
And they called it a mistake.
What is the president's response to them?
And what does the White House think about those former Obama administration officials commenting on this and the appropriateness of that?
I think based on each of those individuals' lack of success in this entire process on foreign affairs, they would probably be the last three people that we would look to for advice and counsel.
Now, I want to just kind of put a side note analysis into this.
You notice how that pundit spoke for 40 seconds of that 50-second clip, and it only took Sarah Sanders 10 seconds to respond and totally just turn away her points?
What these people do, like Jim Acosta, is the worst at it.
Yeah, there's Sarah Sanders.
Total ice queen in a good way.
You have these people like Jim Acosta and this girl where they're only there so that they put out their opinion.
So she's there. This reporter is there saying Trump is bad.
Obama and Clinton and everybody else agree.
Trump did the wrong thing. Iran deal great.
Trump bad. Obama good.
What do you think? And so she takes 40 seconds to basically put that out as the foundation, and then Sarah Sanders basically just rips the foundation away and is like, no, the very foundation of your question is erroneous, so bye-bye.
And that's what they do.
And that's why Sarah Sanders is the best for that job.
Meanwhile, though, this is CNN's Christian Amanpour complaining this clip 10, guys.
Let's go to clip 10 here, saying that Trump is endangering press freedom.
unidentified
Ever since the president was elected, even before he was inaugurated, I made a big speech at the Committee to Protect Journalism in November of 2016, warning American journalists that there was now a grave and existential threat to their work.
Hopefully, because the United States has a constitutionally protected journalism and a constitutionally protected press by the First Amendment, that the press will keep its spine and refuse to bend over to these kinds of threats or Now, pause right there.
All Trump, the only threat, they say threat, the only threat Trump has made to CNN's, I guess, free speech would be he wants to remove them from the press pool.
Well, of course, you have Jim Acosta who needs a tissue anytime he wants to ask a question, and then you've got all of these liberal people that want to go out there and talk for two minutes before they even ask the question just so they can put out their own opinions.
Well, we're not here to listen to your opinion, CNN or whoever you are.
But this is the same CNN that goes on the internet that uses Brian Stelter and their probably trollbot army to attack Infowars, strike our videos, and try to get us removed.
So here's CNN. And that's enough of the clip.
Here's CNN. We're good to go.
And then there was CNN Today reporting on the violence happening in the Gaza Strip.
This little dweeb.
I mean, where do they find these guys?
This little dweeb is reporting from Israel, and he's like...
Of course, Netanyahu is going to be safely protected by his secret service and Trump fully supports it.
And it's like, wow, really?
The leader of Israel has secret service?
Wow, the leader of Israel has bodyguards?
Oh my gosh, I had no idea.
Shocking. Oh, and Trump is also in support of Israel?
Expert on foreign regime changes and foreign entanglements and the psychological wars that really tip these things off.
I think that that's kind of Maybe mainly to blame for what's happening in the Gaza Strip right now, but I don't know.
I want to get Dr. Pachinik's take on this.
First, Steve, let's just get kind of a basic breakdown about why you think there's so much unrest or what you think is behind all this unrest in the Gaza Strip because of the embassy being moved to Jerusalem or the capital being declared Jerusalem.
Because Jerusalem has never been recognized as the official capital of Israel.
Basically, the state of Israel has said that in order to be unified, for us to be recognized internationally, we have to have our capital in Jerusalem.
And the world said, wait a minute, you know, that is the headquarters of Muslims, Christians, and Jews, but that can't be your capital.
But there's a bigger issue than the movement of our embassy to Jerusalem, and that's what's not being talked about.
The Israelis, in their inevitable wisdom or witness, what are you saying?
In their inevitable intelligence, in 1988-89, when I was there in the Gaza Strip, I was working there and I was told about a new group that was being created by the Israeli Mossad which was called Hamas.
So ironically the group that the Israelis have created and are still in contact with Hamas is creating this dissension within the Palestinians.
At the same time you have Abbas who's the head of PLO who broke with Hamas He's leaving and he's exiting and they need a new leader for the PLO. So in effect, what you're seeing here is an opportune time for both the Israelis to move their embassy,
but more importantly, to create strategic tension in that area in order to cover up what Bibi has, a personal problem in terms of corruption, in terms of the inevitability of being jailed and all of that, So he's creating a domestic problem.
He's creating an international product with the Palestinians, a process, and also with the Iranians.
Bibi has been a troublemaker for quite a while, and as General Sharon has said about Bibi years ago, Sharon, these are not my words, but I do agree with Sharon, who's one of the great generals of Israel, said Bibi was basically a coward.
Not only was he a coward, he was reckless and self-aggrandizing.
That was supported by the rest of the national security apparatus of Israel, including the Mossad, when they had a very famous general named Agan, And another general of the combat units called Ashkenazi, who all agreed that Bibi was a troublemaker, but basically a coward who would get Israel into trouble with Iran.
And internally, what you don't see is the fact that Bibi is now in the self-aggrandizing mode.
Trump has helped him through his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, the one that he had to pay $2 million to get to Harvard.
And at the same time, Bibi is allowing himself to self-aggrandize while, in fact, the Iranians and the Syrians are preparing for an inevitable war with Israel.
And at the same time, he's created dissension on the West Bank in Gaza.
This is typical of Bibi.
This is not typical of the national security apparatus of Israel, including the Shin Bet and the Mossad, who do not agree with Bibi.
Plus, he has a Vice President Lieberman from Moldavia who has absolutely no idea about combat or strategy or tactics.
So Israel is in a very dangerous position.
And it's the parents of the Israeli Defense Force who understand that there are 30,000 men who are in active duty now.
The reserves will be called up and there will be all kinds of quiet movement.
They realize that Hezbollah is no longer just a small unit as it was in 2006.
Where Hezbollah, less than 5,000 people defeated an Israeli army of 30,000.
And the Jerusalem Post called it a disaster for Bibi.
And the generals called it a disaster for Bibi.
So once again, we're entering a period where Bibi is going to sacrifice the lives of Israeli Defense Force.
To create a tension point so that he can continue on as Prime Minister when, in fact, they should rid them of this noise.
He's got his fingerprints all over this tension in that region.
There's no doubt about that.
But let me just take one story and let's apply that to everything you've talked about.
So you've got the IDF, which now claims they've stopped, I think, five terror attacks in the Gaza Strip, which they were saying, I can't remember, it was either Hamas or some terrorist organization, you know, they'll blame Iran or whoever it is.
And they're saying, IDF is saying, we stopped five terrorist attacks in this area.
At the same time, you've got Israeli snipers, you've got Israeli drones, you know, dropping tear gas, hitting people that are, you know, protesting in that region.
So you've kind of got everything, the tension kind of focused in that region.
Israel, what I'm trying to say very simply, is that Bibi created a strategic tension point on both sides, on Gaza, Hamas, and allowed Hamas to increase the dissension within the Palestinians on the West Bank, And Bibi is basically looking for trouble so that he can invoke the United States in terms of not only the strategic issue, but in terms of military assistance.
Bibi has always wanted to attack Iran directly.
For the first time, what you mentioned last week, when you saw that video, that was the first strike that the IDF airplanes had ever against Iran directly.
Not against the surrogate, but against Iran.
So Bibi's pushing very hard to get the United States involved in a war that we do not want to get involved with.
In fact, Secretary of Defense Mattis does not want to get into a war.
This is very simply Bibi's attempt to create turbulence so that he can say, look, it wasn't my problem.
I had this problem in 2006 with the Lebanon War, but I lost it.
Okay, so it sounds to me, so let me just boil this down, because I want to get into something else on the other side here.
It sounds to me, and this could make sense, that if Bebe would step down and let someone else handle the issues in the Gaza Strip, that you could maybe actually reach a conclusion here.
Oh, yeah. There are many who are within the Mossad, within the Department of State in Israel, within the national, within even the right of the Likud party who would be more than willing to have peace with the Palestinians.
Remember what I just said.
Hamas was created by Israel.
It's not an entity that works by itself.
It is an entity that serves Israel as well.
Israel has created strategic tension throughout her whole life in order to make certain that there is...
That Benjamin Netanyahu has caused more tensions in the Middle East and in the Gaza Strip and in that region than he's done to help those tensions or ease those tensions.
So that's one angle that's kind of still developing that we'll continue to monitor.
But Steve Pachenik is my guest here.
Dr. Pachenik, I actually want to move into a new topic of discussion here, which is the Iran deal.
And this just continues to bother me.
And I've been trying to figure this out.
And then over the weekend...
So basically, I have basically two talking points that I want to get into with you.
One, what do you think this is about Iran essentially threatening to name politicians who took bribes or who were involved in whatever it is with this Iran deal?
That's essentially blackmail either the politicians, the deep state or Trump.
I'm not really sure.
Essentially some threat to hang out there.
What the goal is, I'm not really sure either.
Maybe to get the Iran deal back, I'm not really sure.
Blackmail the deep state to take out Trump, whatever it is.
So you've got that angle of things, which I want to get your take on.
But first, Steve, where is the Iran deal?
Have you ever seen the Iran deal?
Have you ever seen the actual documents?
Have you ever seen anybody that signed it?
Have you ever seen a signature from the Iranians, from Obama?
I've looked into this. I don't think there ever was a deal.
The last thing I could find was from the State Department, November 2015, that says it's an executive policy.
An executive policy.
No deal, no treaty, no signatures, no Congress, nothing.
I mean, am I reading this wrong?
What is your take on this quote-unquote Iran deal, which I don't even think ever existed?
Whether there's a piece of paper or not is not as relevant as the fact that Obama made an overture to Iran.
He may have given a lot, but here's the issue.
The issue is not about nuclear weapons.
It never has been. One of the reasons why I went into Iran years ago was to see how desperate they really were and how effective the embargoes were.
They were incredibly effective.
What Iran needed was cash and currency and business.
What we needed was to go back into Iran Particularly Boeing, particularly Halliburton, many, many of our companies needed to come back into Iran to build up the economy and also to have business.
The business of foreign policy is business.
It is not nation-state building.
Having said that, in 2006, when we got caught in Iraq, thanks to the neocons like John Bolton and others, we had to get out of there.
And the only country that could help us because we broke up Iraq We're good to go.
What he's really doing is creating a position in the negotiation.
But more importantly, what's going on is that General Funk of the army, our army, has been working with Soleimani's deputy, Qasem al-Ajari, who is a revolutionary guard, a Shiite, Whom we have twice imprisoned for IED imports into Iraq for having killed hundreds of our soldiers, and now we're working with the very people who've killed our soldiers when they came into Iraq.
We've been so entangled with all sides of the issues out there.
Sometimes we're fighting with them.
Sometimes we're fighting against them.
Sometimes we're training them to later fight us.
This is why I'm so glad that we were talking about this because you kind of – you helped get a little clarity to me.
So it sounds to me that regardless of what – Regardless of what you think about Iranians' leadership, regardless of what you think about Iranians' regime, okay, that's one thing.
They're oppressive, they're corrupt, whatever.
Put that aside, it sounds to me like Iran just says, look, we want a seat at the table.
We want a piece of the picture.
We want to be involved in the world order.
So give us the ability to produce.
Give us the ability to have manufacturing.
China and Russia have done that.
Why won't the United States do that?
And then here comes Israel.
So Iran says, give us a seat at the table.
Okay, whatever. You're corrupt.
We'll use that to not allow you to sit here, says Israel.
But Iran just wants a seat at the table.
And then here comes Israel and says, nope.
No, no, no, no. Iran does not get a seat at the table.
Iran, bad guy.
No Iran. So then the U.S. jumps on top of that now into the Trump administration, being allied strongly with Israel.
And so that just ticks off Iran more.
A, does that sound like a correct boil down?
And then B, what do you make of the Iranians saying, we're going to release names of Western politicians who were being bribed or who had their hands in this deal?
Unfortunately, I know one of the journalists at the Wall Street Journal who was highly compromised by Iran, and he wrote about it, but I don't want to go into that particular thing.
You've got to understand, again, in the art of the deal, what Trump is doing, he's creating a lot of tension.
He's creating a lot of confusion.
He didn't say, I'm leaving the Iran deal.
He said, I cannot accept the Iran deal as it is now, and I'm going to impose an embargo.
But the window is open for 90 days or more, and this is the way he played with China, and China's acquiescent.
This is the way he played with North Korea.
North Korea's acquiescent.
And I predict this is the way Iran will acquiesce.
And what Iran wants more than anything else in American products coming in.
If they don't buy our Boeing, they will buy Airbus from Toulouse, France.
And the French are more than happy to ship in anything that we don't ship in.
This is about commerce.
The Israelis also don't admit that they've been sneaking in oil supplies into Iran when they need it.
And when they work with the Iranians, you don't hear about it.
Furthermore, for most of us Jews, we pray to the fact that Cyrus the Great had freed the Jews from Babylonia.
So the essence of Judaism and its prayers is a thankfulness to the Persian people.
Now think about that one.
And Soleimani is also Jewish.
So the whole thing is compounded by all types of minute details.
But the real focal point is the fact that Trump is brilliant at negotiating and pushing Iran to the corner, while at the same time saying, guys, I'm open to the deal, but this deal isn't good enough for all the money you receive.
And by the way, I'll be working with Soleimani to protect you guys in Iraq, where we made a mistake, but I still want more.
That's what he's doing. Israel can be the fly in the ointment, but Israel will be in trouble because of Bibi, not so much because of Trump.
I think that maybe we're looking at a situation, too, where...
So you've got Netanyahu that's been here for a quarter of a century, and then you have a new president every eight years in the United States.
So what? There's been four presidents, I guess, during Netanyahu's regime.
So Clinton, Bush, Obama, Trump.
And so every new president kind of has their own set of, I guess, goals or...
Whatever you want to say in the Gaza Strip between Iran, between Israel.
So then that changes. And Netanyahu has kind of had his same strategy over here that he's kind of had to manipulate and change depending on the president of the United States.
So then here we are 25 years later and the whole thing is just a total catastrophe, a total disaster.
Because in the meantime, there's always been someone else behind the scenes with their own self-interest at hand.
And so it's kind of just a total catastrophe where in the last segment or two segments ago, I'm saying it looks like maybe, and I want to get your take on this, Did Trump have the Jerusalem embassy launched the same week essentially that he canceled or got out of the Iran deal?
Do you think that was strategic of Trump to kind of just blow the whole thing up and just kind of a scorched earth thing so that he can come in here with his own strategy to try to get something done?
What he did was at the same time to say to Iran, look, I'm pulling out of the deal.
At the same time, he allowed Bibi, he allowed Bibi to manipulate Trump.
Bibi thinks he's manipulating Trump.
It's the other way around.
Trump is allowing Bibi to be manipulated, having him manipulated, while at the same time Trump is getting out of the Iran deal.
He's going to watch what happens, what falls out.
If Bibi We have special units already on the border of Saudi Arabia.
Mattis does not want war.
Trump does not want war.
He said it very clearly.
We've paid $7.6 trillion in the Middle East.
We're not coming back. So he's allowing Bibi to make his own mistakes and Bibi will do that because internally the only ones who can control Bibi is the Mossad and the Shin Bet.
That's up to them. It's been 30 years of their problems.
They don't want to do it. That's their problem.
Externally, we're not controlling Bibi because he runs to Putin.
I told you all the time, he's like a little baby.
And that's what Sharon called him, a coward and a little baby.
So Bibi, so final 30 seconds, Bibi is going to be the one that gets exposed here, and it's going to be his own hard-headedness, where even Kim Jong-un and the Ayatollah will end up making deals with Trump.
Netanyahu is going to fall based on his own stubbornness.
I usually don't like getting into this race baiting division, religious division and all this stuff.
but I'm just going to do it in this short segment, because...
It's just ridiculous to me.
I mean, I'm the kind of guy that doesn't, and I feel most people are the same way.
That's the frustrating thing about this.
90%, if not 95, maybe even 98% of our population do not judge people on their skin color, at least to the extent where they're going to discriminate or have some sort of negative emotion to them.
They might think one thing or the other, but it doesn't stop them From engaging in communication or commerce or whatever.
But yet, I have to deal with these stories and it's just like, why do we still, why does this madness still exist?
So here's an example. You know, and I'm going to get into this story specifically with Brandon Tatum.
He comes on Wednesday, is it?
Wednesday? Brandon Tatum on Wednesday because he responded to this because he was very upset about this.
This video goes major viral.
It's all over ABC World News and it gets played on the, I guess it's the Today Show or whatever is the ABC morning talk show.
Black Yale student interrogated after nap.
I posted a video for my own safety.
So this Yale student is, the story goes, her story is, She's writing a paper.
Yeah, there it is on Good Morning America.
Thank you. It's a huge story for them.
And most of the cast of Good Morning America is actually African-American, at least the ones covering the story.
So then it adds to the virtue signal where a young black person sees this and is like, wow, I am a victim.
Wow, people are racist against me, even though that's not the story here.
See, that's what irks me.
They give you this story and they say it's racism, but that's not it.
That's not even it.
Okay, so a student, she says she's out writing a paper, falls asleep in the general common area.
There is a rule at Yale, in that building, you cannot sleep there.
You cannot even loiter there.
It's not allowed.
Well, she falls asleep and her neighbor decides to call the police.
Now, you do a little background check on the neighbor.
She's called the police before.
She's had other disputes with neighbors before.
She's a nut job!
She is a whacked-out nutjob.
Oh, and she just happens to be white.
So perfect ABC News gets the perfect race-baiting story to pit the white woman against the black woman and then call it racism when the police show up and do their job.
So that's the story.
But everywhere you go...
See, look at the bottom line. Her reaction to white classmate calling cops on her.
The lady's a nut job.
It's like any bad neighbor.
It doesn't matter what color their skin is or where they're from.
If they're a bad neighbor, they're a bad neighbor.
But they take it, they spin it, and they say it's all about racism.
And then, of course, they all totally buy into it because that's their argument.
That's their angle. That's their virtue signal.
That's their race pimping.
So that's how the story really goes, but they blame the whole thing on racism.
Uh... So then people respond.
Here's a tweet from Melina Abdullah.
I forget who she's a correspondent with, guys.
Don't call the police on black people.
Do you realize how ridiculous this is?
Like, do you understand? If I was going to actually respond...
I won't even respond to this.
But, okay, don't call the police on black people.
So if I'm in downtown St.
Louis and I have somebody...
Arming somebody or robbing somebody with a gun pointed at them and I could call the police?
I'm not supposed to? No?
Oh, this is a professor.
That's right. At Cal State.
Cal State. Chair of Pan-African Studies at Cal State.
She's a Pan-African.
A Pan-Africanist.
Whatever. You can do whatever you want.
I don't care. The point is, quit race baiting and making black people victims because of your race baiting.
When a black person comes up in the world with you telling them they're a victim, you telling them everybody hates them, you telling them the whole world is racist against them, you are setting them up for failure.
So why don't you stop setting black people up for failure and quit spinning stories and making them all about racism and just call it as it is?
We are working on getting Roger Stone hooked up with us as well as Michael Snyder.
And Roger wants to talk about a story that is...
Well, it really shows you the double standard in not just media but also in justice where Dinesh D'Souza gets charged with campaign finance violations Very minor, very small amount. You could tell it wasn't his intention.
He has to face the full extent of the law.
Then Rosie O'Donnell...
I would say does the exact same thing, but that would be a lie.
What Rosie O'Donnell did was actually worse.
Rosie O'Donnell actually engaged in fraud as well as campaign finance violations.
But where is the news attacking Rosie O'Donnell?
Where is the Justice Department going after Rosie O'Donnell?
Roger Stone, you have seen a lot.
As far as political campaigns, campaign finance donations, and of course what ends up being people violating that law, you've probably seen that a lot in your past, but have you ever seen a more blatant double standard than that applied to Dinesh D'Souza and that not applied to Rosie O'Donnell?
Robert Brennan, a Jersey Republican, famously went to prison for this in the 80s.
Dinesh D'Souza was charged by U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who now, oddly enough, is under consideration to be appointed attorney general to fill the vacancy court.
Caused by the resignation of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.
So, why is the law not being evenly applied here?
Why was Dinesh D'Souza crucified for this campaign finance violation when Rosie O'Donnell gave larger amounts by more donors but remains, you know, free for And not under the same kind of scrutiny or federal indictment that Bahara charged D'Souza with.
This is the stunning hypocrisy of the political establishment and the left, Owen.
Well, the other thing I can tell you, Owen, is that the lawsuit against me and President Trump filed by the Project for Democracy will have a hearing on Thursday in which my attorneys and the attorneys for the president's campaign will argue for dismissal.
Now, as I have said previously, this lawsuit is completely frivolous.
They claim that I worked with, stop me if you've heard this, the Russians, to hack the DNC and give the emails to WikiLeaks.
This is a left-wing conspiracy theory, and those who are bringing this action provide no evidence or any proof.
They merely point to fake news stories that they themselves have generated.
It's an abuse of the system.
The media has already contacted me to cover this hearing, which is Thursday, At 1.30 p.m.
in courtroom 23A of the D.C. District Court.
So I urge those in the alternative media to be there for these crucial arguments while we dismantle this suit.
Now, this should not be confused with the Democratic National Committee suit, which is a mirror image of this lawsuit.
Very similar to the kind of harassment lawsuits that are being filed against Infowars and Alex Jones.
It's part and parcel of the whole of a complete campaign of lawfare, where they file frivolous lawsuits to generate a negative headline, and then they use that negative headline to justify blocking you at YouTube, blocking you at Facebook.
As I revealed on the Alex Jones Show today, we have learned that as of May 24th, no one who is posting on Facebook using their paid posting app can target for reaching Infowars or Alex Jones followers.
This is an extraordinary blow to the grassroots campaigns of conservative candidates.
It's also a blow to me in my efforts to sell my new book, Well, and I want to get back to the legal points you were making a moment ago,
Roger, where, you know, I'm beginning to wonder if You guys don't take a different legal approach to this because all they're trying to do is drain your financial assets.
They obviously don't plan on victory.
And I wonder if...
And of course, here's the problem. The problem is there needs to be a new legal precedent set so that if you do choose to engage in these legal battles that you know you would win...
Instead of just paying the attorneys to put the fires out, if you instead paid them to win these battles, which would be more expensive, will they know that you'd rather go not the more expensive route and just pay to put the fire out instead of pay to destroy the man lighting the fires?
It's almost like... It's almost like...
They know that you'd rather do that, so there needs to be a new legal precedent that says if you do bring about this, they need to be the ones paying your legal bills, essentially, Roger.
That's what I'm saying. So we have filed a Rule 11 claim, which means if this lawsuit is found to be frivolous and dismissed, then they will have to pay my legal fees.
This is designed to bankrupt me.
Which is why I had to set up the stonedefensefund.com, stonedefensefund.com.
I have no choice but to come on Infowars and all my media appearances and appeal to my friends and supporters in the public.
Just as Alex Jones needs to gird for these expensive lawsuits, we have to defend ourselves.
But Roger, what happens though if you take the same approach that the Russians that got indicted by Manafort took and you showed up in court and you said, I demand discovery.
Well, that's what will happen if the suit is not dismissed.
We have seen in that particular case that the government does not want to turn over discovery regarding surveillance.
This is also true in the Manafort case.
You have Jeff Sessions and Rod Rosenstein stonewalling over the question of the Justice Department's use of surveillance.
This, I think, is the Achilles heel of the deep state, and I think it hides their deepest secret.
Put quite simply, they call me a dirty trickster.
But the dirtiest trick I have ever seen is the use of the surveillance capability and authority of the state to spy on Donald Trump and then to raise this phony Russian collusion argument as a distraction for their crimes.
The crimes of the Obama Justice Department and the Obama FBI. Including the unmasking.
Devin Nunes is on the right track here.
It is outrageous that the government stonewalls when an equal branch of government demands the proof for the crimes of the Obama gang.
And you think about it, you find out everything about the spying from Obama, the FBI putting moles into Trump's campaign, probably even into his White House.
One of the things Owen and I have tried to do here at the War Room is to highlight those most important congressional races where pro-Trump, pro-freedom candidates are running against the Republican establishment.
I'm happy to announce that I have decided to endorse Michael Snyder in the race for the first district for Congress in the state of Idaho.
unidentified
Joining us now is family man We're good to go.
Because it's going to be a really, really tight race here in Idaho's first congressional district.
Well, Michael, I decided to endorse you and I have recorded a robocall for Idaho voters because I know you will stand with the president in the coming rumble over impeachment.
Make no bones about it.
The Democrats intend to try to undo what they couldn't do at the ballot box in the last election.
So here's what you need to know about Michael Schneider.
He's not a country club Republican.
He's not part of the Republican establishment.
He is unbought and unbossed.
He would work only for the voters of Idaho's First District.
He's endorsed by Senator Rand Paul.
He's endorsed by yours truly.
And if you're listening to this broadcast and you live in Idaho's First District, Michael's going to tell you right now what time the polls are open tomorrow.
unidentified
Yeah, well, it's different times around the district, but very early in the morning, if you're headed to work, you're going to be able to go very early in the morning and vote, and then the polls are open well into the evening.
It depends on different times at different locations, but it's so important to get out to vote, whether it's before work, after work, on your lunch break.
It's so important because the stakes are so high.
Because on the one side, you've got myself who, you know, the InfoWars audience knows me because they've been publishing hundreds of my articles over the last seven years on InfoWars.com.
I've been on Alex Jones' show numerous times.
I'm going to fight the globalists.
I'm going to stand up for President Trump.
On the other side, we've got a big-time globalist who's probably going to win if I don't, who's being funded by Club for Growth.
Of course, Donald Trump hates Club for Growth, and Club for Growth hates him.
Clumper Growth spent $7 million to try to keep Donald Trump out of the White House.
Now they put $639,000 behind the main opponent that I'm running against.
And so the fate of this open seat in Congress, because the incumbent has moved on, so it's an open seat, so we're either going to get a pro-Liberty, pro-Trump candidate in there tomorrow, or we're going to get a big-time globalist who's being funded by people who hate Donald Trump and who would love to see Donald Trump impeached.
So the stakes are incredibly high, guys, so it's so important that every info warrior gets out to vote on May 15th.
Well, I want to thank my good friend Gary Heaven for bringing your candidacy to my attention.
It is absolutely vital to understand that the club for growth seems to be unhappy with the 3% growth that the president has provided.
Donald Trump had the most pro-growth of any of the Republican candidates for president in terms of his economic proposals, and we see the results working every day.
Info Warriors, I commend Michael Snyder to you.
Michael, thank you for joining us here at the War Room.
Now return to the Hustings and gather up that last handful of votes.
Yeah, and you know, Omar Navarro was on with Alex earlier, another crucial seat for pro-Trumpers to take in this next wave of midterms.
I'm going to have Austin Peterson on with me.
He's going to be trying to de-seat Claire McCaskill, but first he has to win his own primary against what I would say is an establishment.
I don't know how hawkish he is, but Josh Howley is who Peterson is going to be running against.
He's been around for a while at currently the AG of Missouri.
So, you know, the challenge here, Roger, is to take some of the stress off of ourselves and to put some of our own people in Congress so that our voices, our messages, our goals, our agendas can actually be heard in the halls of Congress.
Something that we haven't had for a long time.
And just getting somebody like a Devin Nunes and a Matt Gaetz and a Trey Gowdy in there, you know, even though they're kind of voices in the wilderness, seemingly, they get a lot of our attention because their message actually resonates with us.
Well, and the other crucial race I would point out to you is a state race where Michael Williams, a crusading conservative state senator, early Donald Trump supporter, is running against Country Club Cagle, the lieutenant governor, a Bush Country Club Republican.
I was tipped off to the fact that the Williams campaign was blocked by Facebook in their attempts to reach Infowarriors through their Facebook feed in an extraordinary demonstration of the war of censorship being waged against Infowars and Alex Jones.
Senator Mike Williams is about to go on a tour, in a statewide bus tour, to illustrate the problems with our current immigration system.
We're going to be covering that live here at the War Room coming up.
So that's another key race I want to bring InfoWarriors' attention to.
That's just another candidate that would be pro-Trump that would have an election coming up, does have an election coming up, that Facebook is censored.
I mean, I can't believe this. It seems like every candidate that we bring on the show to try to give a platform to, to try to shed some light on, that's going to get into Congress and be pro-Trump, go with the Trump agenda, make America first again...
It seems like every single one of them gets censored on Facebook, on Twitter.
I mean, this is unbelievable, Roger.
I just can't believe it.
How has there not been antitrust?
How has Facebook not...
I mean, this is crazy.
Zuckerberg had like some three-day questioning, and then we get nothing.
Conservatives, Libertarians, InfoWarriors, we're being kneecapped on the internet today.
They seek to limit our reach.
That's why I ask everybody who's listening and watching to go to the InfoWar store right now.
You can find the donate button.
Your support right now is crucial because Alex Jones and Infowars, just like me, were facing massive lawsuits that are designed to knock us off the Internet.
That's their real goal.
Your contribution of $25, $50, $100, even $250.
And yes, some Infowars have sent as much as $500 or $1,000 to This would be a godsend.
This would be a gift from heaven as we wage this expensive fight.
So if you're not in the market for one of our cutting-edge nutraceuticals, and we'll be talking about those later, you're not in the market for my terrific book, Stone's Rules.
Or any other great products, consider a generous contribution to InfoWars now.
You know, Owen, the tech left attempt to censor us is really breathtaking.
When I take the link from the InfoWars store where people can buy my new book, Stone's Rules, and post it in a Facebook ad, within minutes, Facebook rejects my ad as inappropriate, even though there is no language at the InfoWars link.
This is nothing less than an attempt to stunt our book sales through Infowars.
So please, folks, this is my terrific new book.
It is a rule book, my so-called Rules of the Road.
Everything President Trump needs to know to save his presidency and to survive is in this book.
He merely needs to follow my rules.
Don't let Facebook and Google handicap us in our efforts to educate the public.
Joining us now, Jacob Engels, the crusading publisher of the Central Florida Post, with a stunning story of a gentleman in Florida being ejected from public accommodations because he was wearing an iconic Infowars Bill Clinton rape t-shirt.
So, this individual went into a local bar, a bar that he's been frequenting for several years now, always has been peaceful, never had an issue, went into this bar to meet a few friends, bring them more business, and was wearing his iconic Clinton rape shirt, as you just described. And the bartender said to him, I'm not going to serve you unless you turn that shirt inside out.
It's offensive.
And he said, well, I'm not going to augment my clothing based on what offends you, and I'm not going to turn the inside out, but that's okay.
I'll wait for my friends to get here, and I won't have you serve me.
I'll have them give me a beer.
And that's exactly what the individual did.
Went back into the bar a few minutes later.
Somebody else got him a beer, and that's when this very unstable relationship The bartender literally snatched the beer out of his hands and said, now you must leave the bar.
It's not that I'm not going to serve you.
It's now we don't want you in the bar because that shirt is offensive.
Nobody was offended by it.
No patrons were offended by it.
This longtime patron, Tyler, was actually approached by other patrons.
Customers in the bar who said that was really out of hand.
We've never seen that before. But the bar claims that there's an offensive t-shirt policy and that that was a t-shirt violation.
Nobody's seen these rules posted.
We see F-Trump shirts in there all the time.
We see, you know, shirts praising Che Guevara and communists, dictators who have killed millions.
Apparently that's not offensive.
Apparently it's more offensive to call out Bill Clinton for being a serial sexual abuser.
Sure. It's in Deland, Florida, and it's called Persimmon Hollow Brewing Company.
It's very unfortunate.
People should not spend their money there, and it's not because they're doing something that's pro-Bill Clinton or defending him and his past as a serial sexual abuser.
It's because politics...
It shouldn't be about how you serve people.
And people wear provocative shirts into bars all the time.
A bar is supposed to be a place where you can have frank and sometimes uncomfortable discussions without, you know, getting to blows or having someone remove you.
And nothing was wrong here.
He was being completely peaceful, longtime customer, brought them a lot of business.
And it's interesting that we see actions like this from liberal social justice establishments as we get closer to a peace deal with North Korea, as the tax cuts kick in and provide more jobs and better paychecks for people.
It's almost as if the more America succeeds, the more these people and establishments that are so rabidly anti-Trump, I feel that they have to behave in a way against people that they perceive to be pro-Trump and that's really sad.
Sure. You can follow us at centralfloridapost.com, and we actually just put up a great review of Stone's Rules, your best-selling book that just came out last week, and I encourage people to go and check that out and read it.
It's written by someone who doesn't always agree with Roger Stone, doesn't have the kindest viewpoint on you, but agreed that Stone's Rules is the guidebook to life for anybody who wants to win.
It's not written just with conservatives or libertarians or info-warriors in mind.
I think anybody can benefit from this book.
It's got some reflection of my political views, but it's not really a political book.
So if you're non-political, if you're not interested in politics, or you're a Bernie Sanders supporting progressive or even, God we say it, Democrat.
You could enjoy this book.
Thank you for joining us.
Once again, Stone's Rules available on the Infowars.com store site right now.
Thank you, Jacob Engels.
Have a good day. So, Owen, we see an extraordinary meltdown in the mainstream media.
I think Jacob Engels hit it right on the head.
As we move towards peace, as the economy picks up, as jobs become more plentiful, the hysteria of the deep state grows worse and worse.
I was interviewed by Showtime's show The Circus on Friday, which aired last night.
And although head of Lee edited, they depicted me essentially as Darth Vader.
But I made this important observation.
None of the indictments brought by Mr.
Mueller to date Have related to Russian collusion.
When it comes to the question of Russian collusion or coordination or conspiracy between the Russian state and the Trump campaign or Trump friends or Trump associates or Trump family members so far in the Senate, in the House, with the special prosecutor, they are empty-handed and increasingly hysterical in their efforts to find what does not exist.
So even if they found, quote unquote, Russian collusion, what are they going to prosecute?
So the whole thing is obviously just made up for it's a bad publicity campaign to try to bring Trump down.
And then an excuse to spy on him.
I think that that's all been exposed.
And like you were saying, with all the spying, with the special counsel totally limitless above the law, they still can't find anything.
I think it's obvious there's nothing there except perhaps them covering up for criminal activity that was going on during the Obama administration.
But, you know, Roger, just real quick to backtrack to Jacob Engels with the Bill Clinton rape shirt story from Infowarsstore.com.
You know, people don't really understand what it's like to put on a pro-Trump shirt or to even put on a basic conservative shirt, and they don't understand the hatred they get.
Now, I'm not going to try to make a comparison to that of what black people had to endure.
Obviously, that was much worse.
But in modern times, where else do you get an example of discrimination where you're going to get kicked out of a bar?
Where else do you get an example of discrimination where you can be walking around on the streets and have somebody come up and clock you, cold clock you in the side of the head just because they don't like your hat or shirt?
I mean, you know...
The discrimination against Trump supporters is real, Roger.
And if you don't believe me, put on a Trump support shirt.
Put on a Trump shirt from InfowarStore.com.
Go out to the bar.
Go out to the scenes.
Go out to the streets. Go to a public event.
I think you'll see what we're talking about.
But having said that, Roger, as the deep state and their minions get more crazed and more insane, the average American is actually coming back down to earth and actually coming around on Trump.
Roger, this Stormy Daniels deal, first of all, it's ridiculous that the liberal media tries to use porn stars and terrorists, literally, to try to bring Trump down.
Like, that's where they go now.
I even got a CNN pundit tweeting out, Nathan McDermott, welcome to the resistance, Ayatollah Khamenei.
So, I mean, CNN is literally even going along with this, you know...
It's just all insane.
Anyway, Roger, the reason I bring this up is because a lot of people are starting to ask about Michael Avenatti's background.
And then the Daily Caller does a story questioning his background and his motives here.
And then he threatens them with a lawsuit.
They... Put that email out to the public to say, you know, screw you.
You can't bully us and intimidate us from reporting.
Then, the Western Journal publishes this story today.
Avenatti Docs leak got $8 million out of thin air when Stormy Daniels arrived.
Hmm. So, Roger, as we knew from day one, the entire Stormy Daniels, Michael Avenatti nonsense was nothing more than an attempt to bring Trump down, and now it looks like it's going to be funded.
We'll see what kind of information we get from these documents or who's funding Avenatti, but it looks like now that Avenatti was indeed a political hitman.
Well, and you bring up MSNBC because, for example, they are now in high dungeon over the removal of New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman.
Schneiderman went down, was forced to resign when several women came forward with detailed claims of physical abuse.
Now, because Schneiderman was a major critic of Donald Trump and was involved in the pursuit of Mr.
Cohn, they're obsessed with finding out how he went down or why he went down.
The drug reform activist Randy Credico told me in 2010 that he witnessed Schneiderman snorting lines of cocaine in the back room of a Manhattan comedy club.
But now MSNBC's Ari Melber seeks to turn that around saying, oh, Roger Stone tried to induce Credico to go public with this information.
The truth is, he told me this during a campaign, and yes, I urged him to go public with what he had witnessed.
This is typical.
Ari Melber is part and parcel of those pundits who claim to be unbiased journalists but are in fact are hack partisans.
They've invited me to go on MSNBC several times to confront Melber about his trail of lies regarding me, Julian Assange, WikiLeaks, Sam Nunberg, et al.
But I instead think we should have a much, much broader audience.
And therefore, I challenge Ari Melber to come here on The War Room.
One hour, unedited, mano a mano.
Does Ari Melber have the cojones to show up to this?
The Ari Melber Challenge.
I bet not.
Anytime, Ari. Come on The War Room and we'll have it out.
It is. But now is a good time to remind everybody that we can't expose the hypocrisy of the left.
We cannot continue to do the job we're doing here at the War Room without your support.
Please take a minute to go to the Infowars store now and look at some of our terrific specials.
I particularly like the super blue line of oral products, the toothpaste, the mouthwash.
These are extraordinary products at rock bottom prices.
The time is now.
We need your support.
The expansion here at Infowars, this program, our new studios, plus the incredible costs of these outrageously expensive lawsuits filed against Infowars, it's daunting.
But Alex Jones is not a quitter.
He's a fighter. But we need your support for the fight.
Please go to the Infowars store now.
Look at our terrific product line.
Find the product that is right for you.
We have Survival Shield X2. Not only that, but bodies, two of our very best products on special now.
And again, if you're not in the market for any of our terrific nutraceuticals, please consider going to the donate button and send a generous contribution to the InfoWAR.
We are besieged by a group of hyenas yapping at our heels, and we need your help to beat them back.
You know, Roger, the bodies, which is 50% off right now, is such a key product.
I just started swimming for the first time since summer's back.
I didn't swim all winter.
I swam for the first time probably just about a mile this weekend and I was really sore and so I was really sore yesterday so I popped some of the bodies and today I'm totally soreness free totally inflammation free I mean it's just an incredible product So I'm, in fact, I'm back. I'm ready to go.
I'm going to play basketball tonight.
I would tell the liberals, I would tell you where I'm playing basketball, but I'm afraid the Austin liberals might show up and start hacking me.
But I'm telling you, Bodies is the real deal.
Muscle soreness, muscle aches, inflammation, 50% off at InfoWarsStore.com.
Ah, yes, Vice News, that paragon of journalistic integrity.
Well, they've taken off time from telling us why haircuts are racist to spend some time embedded with the enemy.
That's right, they did an extended expose on Antifa.
They spent a weekend with them camping in the woods, hiding like rats in the shadows, just outside of an event that they were protesting.
In late April, anti-fascist activists camped in the woods of rural Tennessee the night before the American Renaissance Conference.
They hope to get the conference canceled, or at least make it unpleasant for attendees.
For some, it did not matter if the tactics they used were unethical.
Now that is the keystone of the Antifa movement, and it's elaborated on here.
Naya, one of the activists, terrorists you could say, admitted it was possible that there were people among the anti-fascists who were there to do violence for the sake of violence.
How do they weed them out?
We don't. He does not worry that this could mean that the movement was morally compromised.
Well, in order to be morally compromised, you have to have a moral basis to begin with, or else there's nothing to compromise, and clearly they don't have one of those.
No, these people are literally hiding in the shadows outside of an event that they don't like, planning to use violence to bring it down.
unidentified
Are you ever concerned that, like, even if these methods work, they might be unethical?
I'm okay with that. Quote the article, the brutality of these particular activists' physical violence contrasts with the sophistication of their intelligence gathering.
So that was a big part of this was that they have a very sophisticated online presence that gets all sorts of valuable information.
How do they do it and what information do they glean?
That's right. They just make fake avatars and go on the chat rooms and the websites of their perceived enemies and they ask those people, hey, what are you doing and can I join?
And those people say, sure, come here and join us here.
And that is the extent of their intelligence gathering.
unidentified
How do I be a part? How do I go?
That's how we find out.
What they're planning, where they're going to be, and how they're doing it.
I think you'll find that on the internet, pretending to be a girl or just being a girl is people are going to be more willing to help you no matter what.
And the fact that you see a group of people who are eager to find women to join their movement is somehow a sign of misogyny.
That goes over my head.
You'll have to explain the deep-seated communism that allows you to believe such things.
But if you even just look at how they're touting this group's intelligence gathering versus the actual intelligence gathering capabilities of their perceived enemies, which would be like Trump supporters or just trolls on 4chan, that sort of thing, the difference is staggering.
One side discovers where a large group is holding their not-secret conference.
The other side will just take an image of a flag with a blue Uh oh, alright, well, we just got hacked by Antifa here.
I take a camera and a microphone and I give the Trump detractors a platform the likes of which they would never have.
Now while you think being so passionate and outspoken about their anti-Trump They would want to take up that platform, voice their opinion, to show the world the real issues, at least in their hearts and minds.
And either they back down, don't want to comment, curse, spit, or even swing at you, or you get the footage like Fleckis Talks gets, And they really expose themselves as the biggest dumbasses in America.
Now, there's fringe elements on the right, there's fringe elements on the left.
However, the big difference is you can go and expose the fringe of the left for who they really are just by taking their response We're good to go.
Here we are, and a year and a half into the Russia probe, you can still go out on the streets of California and ask people what they think about Trump-Russia, and they still all buy it.
I mean, this is incredible to me.
You go face the brainwashing eye-to-eye, and it's still there.
I mean, at what point is it, like, a shock that they're still doing this?
They've done a great job over the last few years indoctrinating our schools, indoctrinating the students in our schools at every level, especially through the universities.
They've done a great job of making people have super short attention spans and not be able to watch anything more than a minute long with any depth to it.
So there's a lot of aspects that have come, you know, a lot of fruits of labor that have been years in the works here.
And now we're seeing it.
And now, like, you know, I feel like with Kanye West, especially recently, the first shot's been fired.
And now that's our enemy.
And that's who we're up against. It's these perfectly engineered, leftist, brainwashed, manipulatable, educated, useful idiots.
A big push I've had with my content has always been that you don't need to be in a big expensive studio to do this.
You don't need an education in journalism.
You don't need a suit or a nice outfit.
You can just go out in the street with a spoon microphone and ask people some questions.
And you'll get the story.
So that's always been a push from day one.
And it was really cool to see a lot of people, especially young people, a lot of high school kids, going to their walkouts, going to their local protests and asking some really basic questions.
And they themselves open to a debate.
And the way it works out most of the times is once you ask a few questions that go beyond the surface level, most people buckle.
So it's really good to see the right out there doing it.
And I think if we continue to do that, People in the middle will start to maybe change their opinions and choose different sides.
You've kind of added to your repertoire, if you will, this new element where you get people to cold read facts and you kind of come at it from a neutral perspective, which you always do, which is really beautiful to what the artwork, honestly, that you put out is that you come from a neutral perspective, at least when you approach these people.
So you do this thing now and you get them to read a PSA. It's like a cold read and they just sit down.
Now, in the last one, you did the stats about feminism.
Now, it looks like most of the people that came in and read it were kind of hesitant when they read some of these facts and then kind of even backed off of that.
Talk about that experience when you brought the people in to read the facts about feminism and then they read some of them and they were kind of perturbed and it almost seemed like they didn't even want to continue the reading.
We had about six people come in, and I'd say half were pretty much not uncomfortable, but they were unsure, and it really was just crashing their reality.
And the other people, to their credit, they were really open to it and said, wow, I didn't realize these numbers were what they were.
This is really interesting. It changes the whole narrative.
And they were really cool and open to new ideas.
But we did see the strong brainwashed people on the left in a bunch of cases, and even when the facts are given to them straight in the face and they're literally saying it themselves, they still revert back to, you know, I don't know, this isn't right, I don't agree.
And, you know, maybe more and more experiences like this will have people change their minds.
Yeah, I mean, what is that like where they kind of have, like, An awakening moment right there in front of your film crew, but then they want to reject it.
So they have the awakening like, whoa, here's the facts going into my brain, and then they're like, no, no, no, I have to reject the facts.
Yeah, exactly. They have this idea that facts go both ways, and they really don't.
And the people who do try to convince you of that, most times, is the left.
They really do try to manipulate facts and conflate facts and emotions.
Once they get hit with a few facts and they have no choice but to read it, I think part of it when it comes to their reactions is the fact that they now realize they're in maybe a right-leaning YouTube video.
So it kind of crashes their reality, but also it's like, oh no, I'm in behind this line.
Yeah, so that gotcha moment is, you know, way more intense, especially when they sign the papers before basically giving us rights to all the video we shoot and they know exactly what they're getting into.
So there's a multiple gotcha moments on multiple levels with this, but I think the end result was cool.
I think a lot of people appreciated it from both sides, which has always been the goal.
It would have been... Well, I mean, you know, it'd be, I guess it'd be a shame if you did that video anyway, and then you just put it on some other channel, you know, and it just ended up on some other channel that, you know, didn't get banned, or if it did get banned, it wouldn't affect all your other work.
I mean, you know, that's just, that's just something that could happen.
But I think you would actually, I think you would actually probably have a worse response from that Because people, the whole political correct nature, you don't say anything bad about Islam.
Welcome back to The War Room, presented by Infowars.com.
I'm your host, Owen Troyer.
Austin Fletcher of Fleckus Talks joins me now.
Let's advance to some other subjects of discussion here, Austin.
Let's discuss a story that I found.
Well, it's not really a story. It's a tweet that went viral.
It's a young girl...
Her account is at Chan the World, and it's a black girl, and she had some tire trouble on the highway with her father, and a gentleman wearing a Confederate flag shirt with a Confederate flag tattoo with Confederate flag car stickers came up and Helped them get their tire back up, fix the tire, and get the car back up and running and on the street.
And so she tweets out, And this went viral,
and I think it's something that I wish more people could become in tune with, that We are all Americans, and even though we have differences, whether that be what we wear, what we think, what we say, at the end of the day, we need to come together.
We need to realize that we're in this together.
I'm just wondering, is this the type of viral message that can get out?
Is there any hope, do you think, or is it too late?
Has the divide become so expansive that it's almost impossible for people to come together?
The divide is definitely expansive, but I think moments like this and stories like this are perfect because it circumvents the mainstream media.
It's a natural, organic tweet from a non-verified account, just a normal person having an experience, put it out there, and it goes viral.
So I think that stuff is awesome, and I think we do need to see more things like that.
It does kind of worry me with echo chambers, though, because I do have a feeling like probably only the right saw that message and the left probably didn't really go across people's timelines.
But I do think, yeah, we are pretty divided right now.
But I think the right is more than ever willing to talk and wanting to come to the table.
And we're seeing it with people like Kanye and, you know, everything that is out there for conservatives to consume, all the alternative media, is always open to discussion and wanting to bring the country together for the betterment of the country.
I think what we're seeing on the left right now kind of falls into the opposite, where they're trying to tear it down and we're doing our best to hold it up.
So, I think more stories like this would be great, but I do think it is going to be more of a battle than just tweets and stuff.
That's exactly it. Where this story only happens organically and it has to be pushed organically through a grassroots media push, essentially, where a story like this, you know, this girl's never going to get interviewed by CNN or anything like that.
And I'm not saying that that should happen.
It's just that's the point is that so many people, if it doesn't come from their television, right, that's the authority, then it doesn't exist and it's not out there.
And so this is the only type of way we can circumvent that.
But, you know, it's amazing.
Where is the left-wing Fleckus Talks?
You know, I mean, I might be a little bit more aggressive when I go do my street interviews than yourself.
I won't deny that. But where is anybody from the left-wing that goes to right-wing events and asks for our opinion and gives us a platform and puts a microphone in our face to challenge our ideas?
I mean, are you aware of any? I would say the closest thing maybe would be like Jimmy Kimmel's, you know, questions on the street or, you know, the John Oliver type shows.
Like those are the other people that are kind of doing their political commentary, but nothing at the grassroots level, nothing, you know, just people going out on their own with a phone camera and making it happen.
And what you said before is absolutely right.
Like the division is strong.
And I feel like a few years ago, especially with families, you know, especially at the holidays and stuff with families, Politics was sometimes polarizing, but people kind of agreed to disagree or maybe would get into some arguments, but everyone, you know, at the end of the night went home happy.
Now it's so divisive that I know stories that are of families splitting apart that are just like, you know, they can't see each other 'cause they're divided over politics.
So the stakes have definitely been raised in the last few years and politics and entertainment and culture and everything we consume has basically merged into one.
And politics now more than ever is like a centerpiece in what people consume.
And reality TV is basically, you know, shows like CNN.
So that's kind of what we're dealing with now.
Politics has overtaken the culture in a way, and I think it's a great thing because now we have to pay attention, and when you do actually learn what's really going on, I think people tend to lean towards conservatism.
Why would it become so extreme that a family, like, I mean, my family, we argue about politics like cats and dogs.
I mean, we love it, though. And at the end of the day, we all sleep and we wake up the next day and we have a good laugh and, you know, we have breakfast and share orange juice and everything.
But why would now, and I think that's how most families are, but now, like you said, why does it reach this level of extremism where It's so toxic that they don't even have that element anymore where they can just put it aside and say, hey, we may disagree, but we're family.
You know, let's still break bread. I think that the answer is because of what they've done to Donald Trump.
They've made Trump out to be Hitler.
They've made Trump out to be the worst man ever.
He's racist. He's a bigot.
He hates women. He hates Muslim.
He hates black people. He hates Hispanic people.
He's Hitler. He wants to kill everybody.
He's going to start a world war. So they have this total false image of Trump in their head that's all fake.
And so then as soon as you're like, hey, I like Trump.
I support Trump. It's now so toxic that they're so committed to it because of their own, what's the word?
I don't want to say virtue, but because of their own I can't think of the word right now, but I guess conscious is so committed that Trump is the worst person on earth, they can't break bread with you anymore.
They can't come to a middle ground with you anymore because, oh my gosh, you like Trump and he is the worst thing in the history of earth.
Exactly. And there's no room for debate anymore because once you try to defend Donald Trump or bring up a positive point for him, you're defending a racist, Nazi, homophobe, transphobe.
Once you ask one question beyond the surface level of what are you doing here, it becomes, oh, you're with them.
I don't want to talk to you.
And I think it's a combination of those things that you mentioned.
It's the media just reiterating night after night, all over the echo chambers, just hammering it home.
And when you don't see opposing views in your online echo chambers, when you do meet someone from a different background or a different point of view, it kind of blows your mind and you can't understand.
And you think, oh, that's the enemy that's been described to me.
And it just comes from years and years of, I think a lot of these people who are brainwashed, they're entitled, they are educated, but they don't know anything.
A lot of them are in debt and kind of disenfranchised, and their entitlement makes them think they deserve more.
And it makes them like the perfect people for a resistance.
They think they're entitled to more, they think America's better than what it is, and they think they know what's best for America.
So they think it's on them to, you know, promote their values and their right and they're oppressed and we're the oppressors.
So it really creates an environment where we have a group of people who are convinced they're oppressed and they're trying to stop racism and Nazis in the United States.
And we have a group of people, according to them, who are the opposite, who are the racist Nazis who want to continue to have it their way.
So it's just years and years in the making here.
And now it's kind of all coming to fruition.
unidentified
We'll see what happens. And it's really just turned into a cult.
He's working on bringing home a captured journalist in Syria, and he's working on bringing home hostages from Iran as well.
Man, a president that truly cares about this country and cares about its people.
And if that's the least you can say, that's more than you could say for probably any president during my lifetime.
When you really get down to the bare bones.
Well, I have been a bad boy.
I have not been plugging enough this show, and I've already had the crew up here late two nights this week, so we really need your support right now.
Infowarsstore.com is what runs everything here.
So we're actually sponsored by you and your support at Infowarsstore.com.
Now, we have household products like toothpaste and shampoo that is in every house, so you can easily support us by getting your toothpaste with InfoWarsStore.com, the Super Blue Fluoride-Free Toothpaste that has the nascent iodine and colloidal silver in it, a powerful toothpaste, and then, of course, the Emmerichs Essentials All-Natural Herbal Shampoo, also available at InfoWarsStore.com.
Again, these are household items that are in every house.
Why not have them in yours?
Then, I have to say, if you don't have an Alexa Pure Breeze air filter in your home yet, what are you waiting for there?
Now, I don't know. Guys, pull this up, because I haven't even done my research on this.
We might even be sold out.
Pull up the Alexa Pure Breeze air filter system.
We have them all over our offices.
And I was sitting at my desk today, and there's one right in my workspace.
I was sitting at my desk today, and I noticed that the air was like, there was a lot of dust kind of floating around, and I just noticed a difference so much.
So I went and I grabbed a fan, and I was like, what is going on?
And then sure enough, Harrison Smith, who we heard from just a moment ago, said, hey, why isn't the Alexa Pure Breeze on?
So this machine is the real deal.
I mean, you will notice a difference when you put this in your home.
Now, if you have pets, it's great at fighting the dandruff and the odor of a pet.
So, this is a great product.
Why not have clean air in your house with Alexa Pure Breeze air filters from InfoWarsStore.com.
I have two in my house.
We have them all over the office.
Why not get one for your office?
Why not get one for your home?
Get one for your children's bedrooms.
It's all at InfoWarsStore.com, the Electric Pure Breeze, air.
There's even a study now.
Pull this up, guys.
I think it's 90% of people are breathing toxic air.
I mean, this is like a no-brainer.
It's like, okay, studies show 90% of people are breathing toxic air.
Oh my gosh!
InfoWars is trying to sell you an air filter!
Yeah, that's called common sense, dude!
That's like being in the middle of the desert and selling water.
Yeah, you're going to sell that water.
There it is. Nine out of ten people globally breathe toxic air, according to the World Health Organization.
unidentified
Oh, my gosh. And Infowars wants to sell you an air filter.
They're just a bunch of snake oil salesmen over there.
And you have Alex's word to continue expanding even in lieu of all the attacks.
Okay. Let me just hit some of these headlines real quick before I segue into what we're going to do in the next segment.
So it comes out the FBI had a deep state mole in the Trump campaign.
I would stand to reason that that didn't stop.
And in fact, the deep state FBI still has moles in the Trump team.
But what does that tell you that the FBI goes rogue and tries to undermine the duly elected president of the United States?
What does that tell you? It tells you that there is a shadow government, there is a secret society, the deep state is real.
And that's all being exposed.
And Mueller's probe is being totally exposed.
And the worst thing for him, which the media won't cover, is the fact that the Russians he indicted actually showed up in court and pled not guilty and asked for discovery.
So what did Mueller do?
He ran. He hid.
He's nowhere to be found. He's a coward.
He's a fraud. So that whole thing's being blown up, but that's not going to stop the mainstream news from trying to prop it up.
So just understand, every story you see about the Mueller probe from the mainstream news has one intention.
That's to continue the facade that the Mueller probe is legitimate.
100% propaganda to maintain the facade that the Mueller probe is legitimate.
It's fake. It's been exposed.
It's illegal. And Robert Mueller's a coward and a fraud who doesn't even show up in court after he indicts people.
So he indicts you and then doesn't show up in court and doesn't give you discovery.
That's a coward. That's a fraud.
How about CNN and MSNBC giving Stormy Daniels $175 million in advertising media?
What did I tell you, folks?
Stormy Daniels outsmarted mainstream news, and she used them to market her porn to her.
So, more credit to Stormy Daniels.
I mean, honestly, she's the one that tricked him.
Oh boy, I didn't even get into this.
Screaming man runs into London garage shouting, I was attacked with acid, so acid attacks are on the rise in London, so ban acid.
But that's just part and parcel, according to Sadiq Khan.
WikiLeaks, a tale of two FOIA releases.
Here's how the Washington Post handled 24,000 Sarah Palin emails.
Public called out for 100 volunteers, which it managed in teams, to find the scandalous parts.
In contrast, it avoided such efforts for the three...
30,000 Hillary Clinton FOIA emails.
So the Washington Post literally organizes and attacks when the Sarah Palin emails go out.
And then when the Hillary Clinton emails go out, they ignore, they deny, they say it's fake news and you can't look at this.
Now you see who the Washington Post really is.
West Sacramento launching controversial program watching public social media posts so now the city of Sacramento is going to be monitoring social media Hillary Clinton is now blatantly hiding up her back brace so now you know it's real she's wearing these scarves everywhere she goes now because her back brace has been exposed Feds collect record taxes thanks to the tax cuts.
Judge awards $3.5 million settlement to the Tea Party groups targeted by the Obama administration.
Oh yeah, that scandal-free, that scandal-free Obama that spied on the opponents of the Iran deal, spied on his political opponents and targeted them with the IRS. You know, Obama, you know what I mean?
That guy's such a treasonous...
Speaking of treasonous traitors, here's Maxine Waters, mad Maxine, on the floor of Congress today.
unidentified
We are trying to make sure that we're making America great every day in every way.
And the best way to do that is to stop talking about discrimination and start talking about the nation.
The disproportionate numbers of black males that are in prisons around this country are in prisons because they don't have the wealth by which to get fancy lawyers who will go in and ensure that they buy justice for them as white folks can do in America.
This is punishment.
This is being very harsh on the most vulnerable people in our society to include liquor stores in this group of stores that you would not like to have the welfare recipients use.
unidentified
Waters has been charged with ethics violations for asking regulators to help a bank in which her husband had a financial interest.
What people have seen on television in recent days is outlandish behavior by the Tea Party operation in Washington, D.C. And I think that speaks volumes about what's causing problems in Washington, D.C. What exactly outlandish behavior?
Hey Maxine Waters, why don't you quit worrying about the Tea Party and look at your own district and the hellhole that's been created there while you were the representative from that district, Maxine.
unidentified
Maxine Waters is not only a traitor to our nation, but she's not right in the head.
In fact, the only people who are crazier than Maxine Waters are the people who support her.
At this stage of my life, I get a little confused sometimes.
And it sounds like I'm batshit crazy.
But there's a method to my madness.
Because this struggle, it ain't no joke.
And my millennials, they stay woke.
Vaccine Waters, a Democratic congresswoman calling for President Trump's impeachment, getting a standing ovation before presenting the award for best fight against the system.
You are very hopeful in supporting an investigation that could lead to President Trump being impeached.