Dale Partridge argues the American right is fractured because "Christless conservatism" cannot fix a nation eroded by the post-war consensus, which he defines as the deliberate erasure of race, gender, and religious distinctions. He attributes this shift to the 14th Amendment, first-wave feminism, Wilsonian imperialism, and Jewish political influence, accelerated after 1945 by collective guilt over WWII, Marxist thought, economic globalism, and radical individualism. Citing sentencing disparities and white guilt narratives, Partridge urges Christians to recover pre-20th century perspectives through scripture and classic literature to establish a Christian nationalism that prevents repeating the historical errors leading to World Wars I and II. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
America: Christ or Chaos00:08:05
America will either have Christ or will have chaos.
For years, conservatives believed that Trump could reverse America's decline.
But after Trump, the right is now fractured, exhausted, and losing ground.
Endless infighting and electoral losses have exposed a deeper problem that politics alone cannot solve.
A nation that rejects Christ cannot be restored by mere personalities, grandstanding, or Christless conservatism.
So, NXR Studios' first annual conference, America After Trump, brings together pastors, politicians, commentators, and Christians that are committed to strength, cooperation, and a durable future for the American right.
Complaining is not a strategy, and despair cannot be an option.
Christ is King.
Let's live like it.
Save 50% off your ticket only by registering before May 31st.
At newchristianright.com forward slash conference.
Today on American Grit, I unpack the post war consensus and how we went from a nationalistic, patriarchal Christian America to a hellhole of diversity, tolerance, feminism, multiculturalism, and individualism.
In my weekly audit, I'll be discussing sinful black partiality in our Western court system and white guilt that continues to be cultivated across mainstream media.
All that and more coming up right now.
Welcome to American Grit.
We're going to be talking about American identity.
I'm your host, Dale Partridge.
This is episode number four, titled The Post War Consensus and the Fall of America.
Each season, I'll be covering an American theme with about eight episodes.
And in the last episode, I offered the seven marks of the pre war consensus, which functioned as part of kind of a one part or a part one of a two part series.
Now, my goal in this episode is to give you a macro view.
Of the socio political landscape and how it shifted from the closed, strong societies of the pre war world to the open, weaker societies of the post war era.
Now, ultimately, I want you to see how we went from a strong Christian nation to a weak secular nation in less than 60 years.
And when you understand this kind of larger cultural pattern, it'll help you not only see your place in history and the greater world, but also.
Better understand where things are headed.
And let me say this.
Because of the rampant Gnosticism in the church today, that's the belief that only the spiritual matters.
American Christians have been almost willfully ignorant of cultural and political realities.
It's made us unable to contend or contribute and engage at the national level.
And this is not true of Muslims, it's not true of Hindus.
What's so frustrating is that.
This kind of spiritual only way of thinking is foreign to almost all of church history.
In fact, in most of Christian history, the key political players are Christian.
And so, my hope is in this episode is really to educate the church on the macro political and cultural landscape so that more Christian men can contribute to the Christianization of America.
So, let's begin.
So, how do we get here?
How did we get to race wars and Israel wars and boomers against zoomers and mass immigration and multiculturalism?
How do we get lady judges and foreign politicians?
How do we get this adoption of DEI and tolerance and individualism and atheism and globalism?
What about the homosexual marriages, the transgender people, right?
What about legalized sex trafficking through gay adoption and surrogate babies?
Why are nationalists and natural affections called racist?
Why is patriarchy called misogyny?
Why are you not allowed to notice patterns in black crime or in Jewish political involvement?
Why can't you speak against the 19th Amendment without being called a bigot?
And why are Christian white men portrayed as essentially the ultimate enemy?
The answers to all of these questions are connected to the post war consensus.
Now, before some evangelist says to me, Dale, These are just sin problems.
That's why they're here.
Stop making it more than it is.
To them, I would say something like this Well, you're correct.
It's at the very least a sin problem, but it's not merely the organic result of sin.
This is a unique, manufactured, cultural phenomenon never seen in the history of the world.
See, prior to 1950, we had thousands of years of the pre war consensus.
It was still a sinful and fallen world, yet there was.
There was no mass feminism.
There was no mass homosexuality or transgenderism or globalism or mass immigration or interracial marriage happening everywhere or pornification of society.
There was no careful culture.
Okay, what we are dealing with in the last 70 years is historically unprecedented.
Okay, like I cannot look to any previous generation for advice on these issues because none of them have ever existed on this type of scale before.
In other words, society has simply never had to address what we are dealing with at mass.
So the question again is what happened?
How did we have such a catastrophic shift in such a short amount of time?
So let me just.
Get clear first, okay?
If I had to summarize the central intent of the post war consensus, it would be this the erasure of distinctions and hierarchies, okay?
So the deliberate removal of differences between races, ethnicities, nations, genders, religions, right?
It is the great flattening.
The technical term, as we all know, is egalitarianism.
Now, the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy defines egalitarianism as.
Quote, a school of thought in contemporary political philosophy that treats equality as the chief value of a just political system.
Simply put, egalitarians argue for equality.
They have a presumption in favor of social arrangements that advance equality, and they treat deviations from equality as suspect.
End quote.
Okay.
Now, here's why.
As we will see, much of the PWC, the post war consensus, is driven.
By the feminization of society.
Okay.
Women of both sexes hate conflict.
Okay.
They will do anything to avoid it.
Eliminating distinction between, you know, sex and race and nation and religion, all these things, eliminating distinctions is a way to remove any possibility of comparison, competition, hierarchy, because distinctions imply difference.
And difference inevitably leads to judgments of superiority and inferiority, which produces, you guessed it, Conflict.
So for most of human history, okay, distinctions were seen as natural.
Foundations of Cultural Continuity00:02:53
They were God given and they were socially beneficial.
They created order.
They created identity, accountability.
They created a sense of cultural continuity.
But again, how did we lose this?
Like, how did distinctions go from good and necessary for thousands of years to problematic and oppressive in just 70 years?
Now, I believe there were.
Five main drivers behind the switch.
I might only list four because I might.
So there's four to five.
But before we talk about those drivers, I'm going to go with four.
I'm going to go with four because I'm going to save the fifth one for my next episode.
I want to discuss four earlier foundations that were laid.
So this makes it simple, right?
So four foundations and then four drivers.
That's what we're going to talk about, right?
And so I want to discuss these earlier foundations that were laid.
And these are the groundwork.
That allowed the West to embrace the post war mindset so rapidly in the 1960s.
In other words, while the shift was rapid, there were prerequisite realities that primed kind of the expediency of that shift.
Warning this product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical.
All right, guys, you know the drill.
This is our favorite sponsor, Knickknack, Pollywhack, Give a Dog a Bone.
These are knickknacks and.
They're America first, manufacturing the product in America.
They're Christ is King, Maxing.
You've got the foot of our Lord and Savior crushing the head of the serpent right there on the can.
They're Christians.
We know the guys.
They support us.
We need you to support them.
If you don't use nicotine, you can just skip this commercial.
If you do use nicotine, I'm not asking you to start a new habit.
You can spend money on the thing you're already buying, but actually spend less because I'm going to give you a deep discount here in just a second.
And you'll be supporting an America First Christian company that also supports us over here at NXR Studios.
So you can buy it online.
You go to knickknack.com, use our promo code, all caps, J O E L. 20!
That's Joel20!
And you're going to get 20% off.
That's if you buy it online, knickknack.com.
But now you can also buy knickknack in the store.
If you go in the store and use our code, the link in the description below, then you'll actually get paid to try out their products.
You'll get $3 back when you buy your first can.
Then you'll get a dollar back when you buy can number two, three, and four.
And then another $3 back when you buy your fifth can.
It's pretty simple.
You just upload your receipt and they'll send you the cash back.
So go to knickknack.com.
If you want to buy it online, Joel20! or use our code in the description below if you're buying it in the store.
Laying the Globalist Foundation00:09:30
So the first foundation began with the Civil War and the American Reconstruction.
Now, as many of you know, the Naturalization Act of 1790 limited citizenship to free white persons of good character.
But the 14th Amendment of 1868 overturned the criteria for birthright.
Citizenship, where essentially all free people, including blacks and other races, could be considered American citizens if they were born on American soil.
Now, what did this do?
Well, of course, this was the embryonic effort to erase racial distinctions tied to a particular nation, especially as it pertains to American law.
And it primed the country to be a multi ethnic nation.
So, up until that point, so you're talking, you know, since 1620 or so.
You had a nation that was exclusively white.
While there were blacks there, they were not considered citizens.
And so it also marked the beginning of eliminating racial differences in American law.
So this is planting the seed for future non European immigration policies and creating a legal foundation that later tempted illegal immigration, anchor babies, all of the things that would come with that, because essentially you could earn automatic citizenship simply by being born on American soil.
So that's the foundation number one.
The second foundation was the first wave feminism, which emerged in the late 1800s.
Now, so just as the Civil War and the 14th Amendment began erasing racial distinctions in American law and the understanding of ethnicity in a nation, first wave feminism begins to systematically erase sexual distinctions.
And so when they were demanding involvement through suffrage, women, The suffragettes successfully pressured the state to stop treating married couples as a single legal unit under that historic doctrine, which we talked about called coveture, where a woman essentially loses her legal identity in her husband.
It's from the biblical idea of two becoming one.
And instead, the laws began viewing husbands and wives as separate, autonomous, legal individual entities.
Now, this legal shift.
Was a critical step in what?
Well, in dismantling the biblical model of marriage and the family.
And it directly fueled the rise of radical individualism and self expression that came to define the post war consensus many decades later.
So, feminism's war on sexual distinctions laid the groundwork for the modern view that men and women are essentially interchangeable and that individual rights trump covenantal responsibilities and structure.
So, that's point number two.
The third foundation.
Is what I call American supremacy.
American supremacy.
Now, as America became the world's leading superpower, we began to see it as our kind of noble responsibility to think less like a nation and more like an empire.
And what I mean by that is that the seeds were planted for, you know, so let me just back up for a second.
You got point number one the seeds are planted for eliminating racial distinctions in the 14th Amendment.
Then the sexual distinctions in the third wave feminism.
And here we begin to lose our nationalistic distinctions because we're thinking like an empire.
Okay, so the empire, the way that it's kind of flattening out is that we're not thinking like a sovereign nation.
We're now thinking bigger, like an empire that is less nationalistic, it's more multi ethnic, multinational.
Okay, that's how we started to think.
In the 1910s, Woodrow Wilson, Had something what's called Wilsonianism, and this dramatically reshaped America's identity with his famous call to, quote, make the world safe for democracy.
And he had something what's called the 14 points policy, where he casts America essentially as like a global political missionary.
And we were charged with essentially spreading self determination, collective security, and open trade across the world.
Now, this is a really dangerous shift away from nationalism for two reasons.
So, first, Our founders built a constitutional republic, not a pure democracy.
Second, they warned against foreign entanglements.
Don't get involved with foreign entanglements.
Yet again, Wilson turned us into an empire to police the world.
In fact, his emphasis on democracy became a Trojan horse that really pulled us into World War I, and it laid the foundation for a variety of other things of global order, including the Atlantic Charter and also the United Nations.
So, what started as lofty rhetoric quietly transformed us from a self governing republic into the world's self appointed social engineer for democracy.
So, this was kind of, again, laying the foundation for globalism.
So, you again, you have these foundations, the first three, right?
So, you have the distinctions of eliminating racial distinctions, at least in the law.
And then you have the foundation of sexual distinctions.
And then here, you're now losing some nationalistic distinctions.
Everything's kind of blurring.
It's kind of becoming androgynous.
And the last major foundation is Jewish involvement in American politics, but more than politics, really also finance, culture, and media, which truly began the elimination of our religious distinctions from the Jews and gave us birth to this kind of hyphenated heresy of Judeo Christianity.
And so, what many American Christians don't know.
Is that throughout Christian history, the Jews have been viewed as the enemy of Christians, the enemy of Christ, right?
Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, they all wrote about it in the second and third centuries.
Augustine, John Chrysostom wrote about it in the fourth centuries.
Chrysostom wrote, The Jews sacrifice their children to Satan.
They are worse than wild beasts.
The synagogue is a brothel, a den of scoundrels, the temple of demons devoted to idolatrous cults, a criminal assembly of Jews, a place of meeting for the assassination of Christ, a house of ill fame, a dwelling of iniquity, a gulf and abyss of perdition.
So, I mean, this is the historic posture, right?
Several popes held similar positions.
Abigail of Lyon, Thomas Aquinas, Martin Luther, John Calvin, many of the Puritans.
So, our modern connection of Jews and Christians is a historical theological phenomenon.
At the peak of Henry Ford's wealth and his influence, Henry Ford, by the way, he's a practicing Anglican, right?
He began speaking about what he believed was a disproportionate Jewish role.
In banking, media, and politics.
He actually wrote a book about it.
I thought it was so fascinating.
He wrote a book called The International Jew.
It was released in 1920.
He argued that Jewish influence was essentially reshaping America in ways that undermined the traditional Christian and national values and identity that we had held.
Now, this pattern became especially visible in the 1930s.
FDR's administration, for the first time, but they started having several prominent Jewish advisors.
Who played major roles in designing the New Deal and expanding centralized federal power, which made the federal government far stronger and the states much weaker.
And it continued to push us toward more of a pure democracy and not a republic.
And at the same time, we had dispensationalism, which was growing in American churches, which further primed the soil for a political relationship with the Jews.
Now, I'm sure that you know that Talmudic Judaism.
Is literally antichrist.
I mean, it openly regarded, you know, it talks about in the Talmud Christ burning in excrement.
It calls him the bastard child of a whore.
There is a variety of elements of Talmudic Judaism.
It openly regarded Christian Western civilization as a kind of Babylon or a spiritual enemy that must ultimately fall.
Now, I will be clear not every individual Jew holds these views, but history testifies to a deep, General Jewish involvement in many of the dimensions of the post war consensus that we're going to be talking about.
Right now, a lot of families are trying to eat healthier.
I know that my family is trying to do this as well.
But when you look at the prices of truly grass fed, pasture raised meat, it feels impossible.
Economic Drivers of Division00:15:36
That's why I want to tell you about our sponsor, Wild Pastures.
Wild Pastures works with over 100 American family farms to deliver 100% grass fed beef, truly pasture raised chicken and pork.
And wild caught seafood directly to your front door.
And unlike a lot of these big meat delivery companies, their beef is raised right here in the good old US of A.
No imported beef from overseas.
Their animals are rotationally grazed, non GMO, raised without antibiotics or hormones.
And the farms focus on regenerative agriculture that actually restores the land instead of destroying it.
And here's the best part they've made this actually affordable.
In many cases, Their products are 25 to 40 percent less than what you'd expect to pay for this kind of quality.
So, if you want cleaner meat, better sourcing, and you want to support America's farmers, then go and check out Wild Pastures.
You can go to wildpastures.com forward slash NXR.
Again, wildpastures.com forward slash NXR.
Try it for yourself.
Get 20% off of your first box, plus an extra $15 off when you use our link in the description below.
So, by the 1930s and 40s, all four of these foundations, the erasure of racial, sexual, national, and religious distinctions, had fully primed the West for what would become the PWC.
Now, when you combine the victory of World War II against fascism, you know, which again, an idea, what is fascism, right?
It's basically totally built on having strong distinctions of race, sex, nation, and religion.
But when you combine the victory in World War II and you combine that with the dominant Holocaust narrative, it like supercharged this kind of modern egalitarianism.
And suddenly, anything associated with distinctions became equated with Hitler.
Or Nazism, right?
So, what was the goal, right?
The goal is stamping out every such distinction because that was framed as a moral duty.
It was kind of a solemn vow that the old world must never ever happen again because that would be again Hitler.
And so, this brings us back to the phenomenon of this great shift.
So, even though these four foundations had been laid, the scale and the speed of the transformation after 1945 were still Historically unprecedented.
So, I want to look at them.
I want to look at these four drivers behind the shift and how America, despite winning the war, now feels as though we lost.
And we lost our soul, we lost our identity, we are losing our nation.
And so, we're going to look at four of these major drivers in this process of developing the post war consensus.
Number one is collective guilt.
And the pathologization of the West.
That's a long word, right?
All right.
The devastation of two world wars and the horrors of the Holocaust narrative did more than create backlash against fascism.
It instilled a deep collective sense of national guilt in the Western psyche.
When you look and you zoom out, I mean, these were essentially white wars.
Now, the very existence of Western civilization was now something to be ashamed of.
What began as a war among white nations quickly mutated into kind of a blanket condemnation of anything that made the West distinct its European ethnic roots, its Christian heritage, its nationalistic pride, its history of conquest and colonization, its confidence in its own objective superiority among other nations.
So, post war America.
Became steeped in a profound sense of self hatred after the war.
Instead of placing the blame where it belonged, maybe on poor leadership, maybe on the overextension of nationalism into dictatorship, maybe a sinful degree of racial prejudice, instead of pointing it towards those things, the Western culture assigned guilt to the good things nationalism, race, and religion.
Now, this shift transformed multiculturalism and interethnic mixing and religious pluralism and all of these kind of PWC things into a powerful public virtue signaling of repentance and tolerance.
I would say repentance from that old world that caused those terrible wars.
And look at us, we're so tolerant, we are repenting, we are signaling that we are not that anymore.
And so, by embracing these ideals, These new ideals, America and the West could demonstrate that they had rejected that old historical identity that caused such great atrocities.
Now, here's the catch.
And this is it.
Okay.
It was all built on the fantasy that peace could be achieved if only distinctions no longer mattered.
That if we just erased borders, if we just blurred biology, if we just removed our eyes through colorblindness, If we just diluted our convictions and flattened every difference and distinction, conflict would just disappear.
But that is not reality.
And we are beginning to learn that again now.
Okay, so that's the first driver.
The second driver is the rise of Marxist and cultural Marxist thought.
Okay, now Marxism is the great equalizer.
Okay, it's the ideology of.
Of envy and destruction.
It was the philosophy of a Jewish man named Karl Marx.
Now, in the 1960s, after classical Marxism had failed, a new form took root.
Classical Marxism divided the world into oppressor versus oppressed.
And it did this along economic class lines.
But when the economic approach of Marxism didn't work, it collapsed, the Frankfurt School and other kind of neo Marxist Groups shifted the battlefield from economics to culture.
So, race, gender, nation, religion became the new categories of oppression.
Okay, this aligned perfectly with the Western guilt that felt a constant need to kind of pay these reparations for its own existence for what had happened in World War I and World War II.
Okay, so the goal of Marxism was essentially.
It's like gas on the fire.
It was dismantling the old order.
Anything superior was viewed as a threat.
And if you cannot raise the bottom, you must tear down the top.
And so instead of an objective meritocracy that honestly acknowledges superior individuals, groups, distinctions, cultures, nations, we began treating superiority as oppression.
And these distinctions were reframed as essentially tools of domination rather than.
Natural God ordained parts of creation.
And so this ideology slowly captured academia.
It captured media and cultural institutions after 1945 and really into the 60s.
And it planted the seeds of tolerance, equality, diversity, inclusion, right?
It gave us participation trophies, the elimination of objective standards, the kind of weaponization of guilt, right?
And it really was the slow erosion of Western confidence.
All of our previous generations' pride and strength and honor and integrity, all of these things now were framed as oppressive, and we need to run from those things.
We need to get away from those things that led back to Hitler.
We got to get away from that authority.
That's not good.
So, the third driver is the economic globalism and the demand for cheap labor.
And so, Since both world wars were fought across Europe and Japan and not here in the United States, minus, you know, Pearl Harbor, the devastation of their lands destroyed their manufacturing and all of their economies.
Now, here in America, we emerged from the war and we had essentially no trauma here on our lands.
And we emerged essentially as the undisputed global economic superpower.
Now, here's a line I just want you to remember, right?
This is very important.
Capitalism, when disconnected from Christianity, leads to corruption.
Okay, I'm going to say it again.
Capitalism, when disconnected from Christianity, leads to corruption.
Okay, and this is exactly what we see.
Under the emerging globalistic framework, American corporations saw themselves with a massive opportunity.
And capitalistically, they said, hey, let's open up these borders.
They saw cheap labor overseas, cheap manufacturing overseas.
Cheap imported labor and products from overseas.
And so this economic pressure, heavily influenced by the passage of the 1965 Hart Cellar Act, which we're going to be talking about in the next episode.
But we began essentially seeing an opportunity to further this globalistic framework through economic desires.
And that was a huge driver on importing.
People, I mean, you think about the H 1B visas, you think about all of the stuff around labor, you know, not made in America, made in Japan, made in China, all of that stuff came and it started making us think more internationally, more globalistically, more empire, and less nationally.
Okay, the fourth driver.
The fourth driver is the triumph of radical individualism and consumerism.
And there's a really good book.
The age of entitlement that really talks about this.
But when you remove all of the distinctions, when you're drowning in guilt and shame from Marxism, and then you fuel it with raw capitalistic greed detached from Christianity, the natural result is radical individualism.
Every person became an autonomous God.
The old world's covenantal group mindset.
Duty to church and family and nation, they're like butchered on the altar of self expression.
And when the individual becomes king, any call to group identity becomes an enemy.
And this manifested heavily with the boomer generation.
They are the most objectively selfish generation in human history.
They were raised by, well, yeah, there's some rationale here.
They were raised by checked out fathers broken by war, so PTSD, feminist mothers who left the home for work during their husband's time for war.
And for the first time ever, children were raised on the television.
Now, it wasn't the TV or the TV shows that necessarily destroyed them, it was the commercials.
That taught them that life revolves around me.
In other words, they were the first generation of children deliberately targeted by corporations for advertising.
And so, this childhood entitlement that started post war exploded in the 1960s.
And so, you had this, again, entitlement mentality that was built up into these young people.
And then you have the sexual revolution, which quickly became essentially a marketplace.
To quench sexual desires, pornography was born, birth rates collapsed, children were now seen as kind of a threat to personal freedom.
We saw that the boomers had less children than the generations before them.
Even the church morphed into kind of a marketplace of programs and entertainment and emotional pragmatic experiences.
And so, this kind of me first generation acts somewhat like a tsunami that's like roaring through the 1960s and 70s.
Really pushing through even the 2010s.
And this group, if you just look through 1960 to 2020, what happened?
Well, we enshrined feminism, sexual anarchy, untethered capitalism, mass immigration.
And so, you know, blinded by this self love, they never once, these boomers, never once asked what kind of nation they were handing their children and grandchildren.
I mean, we see this with their bumper stickers, right?
Spending my children's inheritance.
Now, again, I get it.
Not every boomer is like that.
There are some great, excellent men and women in the boomer generation.
But the post war consensus, the world we all grew up in, was a violent pendulum swing against the old order.
It was, again, driven by guilt over nationalism and Christianity.
It was shamed by Marxism, it was fueled by godless capitalism.
Powered by the most selfish generation to ever walk the earth.
It was essentially leaving us with a relentless sense of what?
Confusion, right?
We have no anchor points, no identity, no heritage, no history, no patterns to follow from the old world.
Guilt Over Nationalism and Faith00:02:56
Like everything has been stripped away.
We are kind of like become this blob of androgyny and any expression of group identity.
Is racist.
You know, it's white supremacy.
It's white nationalism, right?
It's like we've been struck with some sort of national amnesia.
You know, and getting out of this is going to require a long process of retrieval and recovery.
It's going to require us reading books from before the 20th century.
It'll be a time of remembering what the world operated like outside of our modern.
Multicultural, multi ethnic, diverse, you know, inclusion, feministic, globalistic world.
Okay, modernity is not going to help us.
So, what do we do?
What do we do?
A few things.
Go read the scriptures.
You got to go read the scriptures.
You got to remember the old world.
You got to try to not look at it through the lens of your modern PWC mindset.
It's all over us, it's the water we swim in.
It's like a fish doesn't know it's wet.
We are covered in PWC.
And so we have to try to read the scriptures.
And one of the great ways to do this is to read commentaries, pre 1900 commentaries, and see what their interpretation was.
That is a very helpful way to see how the men before us were reading the scriptures.
Then go read the classics.
Go read that old world classic literature.
Go read the Puritans.
Go read the Reformers.
Go read Chesterton.
Read Washington.
Read Roosevelt.
Read the biographies of these men and read biographies that were written at least in the 1900s or earlier, because even now we have revisionist history garbage that's trying to erase the old world.
You know, Christopher Nolan trying to add every white person with a black person, and you know, the new Harry Potter trying to replace them with white people with black.
I mean, it's just revisionist history, revisionist fiction.
It's constant, it's everywhere.
We need to turn back to the old men, the dead people, to figure out where is the way forward.
Where is the way forward?
We need their guidance.
And that is a desperate work of today's generation.
So, recovery and retrieval, that is what we are doing.
All right, let's move on to the weekly audit.
The Pathologization of the West00:04:10
So, I want to talk about black partiality and this two tiered justice system.
So, I want to show you a quick video.
I've kind of clipped it up a little bit just to make it a little bit shorter.
We'll watch it together and I'll have some commentary after it.
Hold up to their home and pointed weapons at the children and the other people at the party.
Here's what she said Judge William McLean noted before sentencing that given the nature of the language used, a heavy use of the N word directed at the people and children at the Birthday party.
He said that there was no doubt that this was a racially motivated crime.
And he also said driving around town in a convoy of pickup trucks with Confederate flags and waving weapons was seen as a threat, not just to this family, but to the many people who ended up calling 911 that day.
He said that is why he felt like the defendants had to be held accountable.
There were other people who were charged in this case.
They pled they're serving two to four years.
We'll have much more on this.
Yeah, so this is an old video that had recently resurfaced across X.
It's a Georgia couple.
They flew Confederate flags.
They're yelling racial slurs.
They're brandishing guns.
And they made implied death threats or at least some sort of threats toward a black family.
And they were sentenced as committing a hate crime.
Joe Torres got 20 years.
Kyla Norton got 15.
Now, it was certainly foolish, evil, and wicked.
They should not have been doing that.
But there was no assault, there was no contact.
There was essentially just mean words, threats, and brandishing.
But when you contrast that to the sentencing of other cases, not with mean words, but with actual assault and murder, you start to see the problem.
So there's a few other cases that I just think about.
Jordan Hill, he's 18 years old.
Tess Faye Cooper, age 18 of Chicago.
Brittany Covington, 18 of Chicago.
Tanisha Covington, 24 of Chicago.
They were each charged with.
Aggravated kidnapping, hate crime, aggravated unlawful restraint, battery, use of a deadly weapon.
The incident involved a victim being tied up, beaten, forced to drink water from a toilet while the attackers made derogatory comments on them and they received four to eight years.
Not 15, not 20, but four to eight.
Just recently, Roger Jackson, Recently, he cut a plea deal after being charged with attempted murder against Sicko Stew.
And again, he received two years.
We recently saw Chud the Builder, who was foolishly looking for trouble, but nevertheless found himself assaulted by a black man and shot him in self defense.
His bond, Chud's bond, was $1.25 million.
But Carmelo Anthony, The guy who stabbed and killed Austin Metcalf over a seat at a sports game had his bail reduced to $250,000.
Now, I could come up with literally hundreds, if not thousands, of examples of black privilege in the American justice system over the last 10 years.
America continues to apply the self hatred of the West.
To our court system as a way to again signal that they are not racist.
So it's a big problem.
We need to get rid of this double standard and things need to be equal again.
All right, the next story I want to talk about is again, really on this concept of white guilt because these kind of flow together with the post war consensus.
White Guilt and Double Standards00:07:32
Now, you may have seen a couple weeks ago, 60 Minutes spun a pro white group that helps during disaster reliefs as negative and dangerous.
Let's watch the video.
A surge of tornadoes tore across a large swath of the country in April.
Carving a path of destruction.
Over 200 tornadoes hit over 20 states closely clustered in the last couple of weeks.
Our story tonight is about what happens after these natural disasters.
A pattern has emerged in recent years in which militias, conspiracists, and white supremacists show up to hard hit communities, as they did last week in Texas, offering help.
But they've been called disaster tourists, who are out to sow doubt in government, soften their own image, And gain followers.
September 2024, Hurricane Helene barreled through North Carolina with forces so powerful it nearly wiped the town of Bat Cave off the map, lifting homes and toppling trees.
Imagine taking in a box of toothpicks and dumping them on your kitchen counter.
Sheriff Lowell Griffin faced a daunting rescue task.
We had already experienced days of heavy rain.
Yes.
Then another whammy.
Outsiders started pouring into North Carolina.
So we got a lot of work to get done, if you're able to find it.
Including an influx of anti government far right groups.
The sheriff himself didn't see all the groups, but we know among those to show up were members of white nationalist group Active Club.
Going to a disaster relief is directly helping our people.
You go in to help white people.
Yeah.
Robert Rundo co-founded Active Club in 2020 as a place for disgruntled young white men to work out together while sharing their ideology.
With nearly 90 chapters, it's been described by watchdogs as one of the country's fastest growing white supremacist networks.
They also hold mixed martial arts tournaments.
We get together with the boys, we box, we travel.
Do you think of it as fun?
Of course.
You know, there's fun in fascism.
Fun in fascism?
I'm a nationalist.
What does that mean?
A nationalist?
Yeah.
It means I put my people first.
Would you say white supremacist?
No, I think that's a slanderous term.
But my people are white people, European white people.
Right, and there's plenty of organizations that are geared towards other ethnic groups, right?
If we don't look out for ourselves, who is?
I know that your organization has gone to floods, fires, hurricanes.
What if you came upon someone who wasn't white but is suffering because of the flood?
Like, if there was like a guy on fire, would I give him water?
Yeah, I'd probably give him water.
A surge of.
Yeah, so we know you have Muslim towns being built in Texas.
You have Black Lives Matter.
You have the NAACP.
You have the National Urban League and hundreds of other black and minority advocacy groups.
Okay, but the moment white people organize to help their own people, it's immediately branded.
As a threat.
And so this is, again, the blatant ethnic double standards that are flourishing under the post war consensus.
And it shouldn't shock us that this stuff's happening.
This is the type of things that are branded as terrible.
These are the, oh my goodness, you can't go back to that old world.
That old world means Nazism, it means Hitler.
The reality is that for thousands of years, we had nationalism governing the way the world worked.
We had everybody, nobody viewed race as being a bad thing.
It was a positive good.
Again, we talked about this in previous episodes.
To this day, right?
Mexico is filled with who?
Mexicans.
Japan is filled with who?
The Japanese.
Russia is filled with Russians.
Africa is filled with Africans.
Nigeria is filled with Nigerians, right?
It's only the West that we are not allowed to have any of these distinctions.
If we do, it is considered racist.
It is considered Hitler.
It is considered Nazism.
It's considered fascism.
It's considered white nationalism, white supremacy, all of these things.
We are supposed to feel guilty and shameful for all of this stuff.
Is wrapped up in the post war consensus.
Probably the greatest book, we talked about it in the last episode for you to read, is Return of the Strong Gods by R.R. Reno.
It is a great book.
And again, the narrative is this that we had the world operated a particular way for thousands of years.
And then we had this phenomenon of the pre war consensus, of this transition.
And then it transitioned in 1960 real hard to the post war consensus.
And so This huge shift, it's an experiment.
Again, I can't look back to my forefathers of previous generations and go, what did they say about mass transgenderism and trannies reading my children's library books?
Can I go back and read in the 1700s about interracial marriage?
Can I go back and figure out what they were doing about their mass immigration policy?
No, you can't go back and look for any of this.
Like, what about?
Oh, how do we deal with women pastors and feminism that's happened everywhere?
No, this stuff never existed for the history of the world.
And here we are dealing with it.
And it's very unique.
And R.R. Reno's book demonstrates that we are seeing the return of the old world, which he calls strong gods, return of the strong gods.
And just like this young gentleman that was here in this video on 60 Minutes, the young men are organizing.
They are very much nationalistic.
They are very conservative.
They are very much patriarchal.
Now, the key is this we need it to be Christian because nationalism without Christ can turn into what caused World War I and World War II.
We need Christian nationalism.
We need biblical patriarchy.
We need Christian capitalism.
We need the church to speak into these things because without that, We end up actually repeating history.
But if we can Christianize these things, if we can have godly Christian men leading society, it will prevent from many sinful errors.
So that's a wrap for this episode.
You can follow me on Instagram or X or YouTube and find any of my books on Amazon.
Next week, I'm going to be discussing the Heart Cellar Act, the story behind America's mass immigration and demographic replacement.
My name is Dale Partridge.
Thank you for watching or listening to American Grit.