NXR Podcast - THE LIVESTREAM - Supreme Court To Overturn Obergefell? Aired: 2025-08-11 Duration: 33:03 === The Abortion Rights Issue (14:39) === [00:00:00] Leave us a five star review on your favorite podcast platform. [00:00:04] I get it. [00:00:04] It's annoying. [00:00:05] Everybody asks, but I'm going to tell you why. [00:00:07] When you give us a positive review, what that does is it triggers the algorithm so that our podcast shows up on more people's news feeds. [00:00:16] You and I both know that this ministry is willing to talk about things that most ministries aren't. [00:00:21] We need this content for the glory of God to reach more people's ears. [00:00:30] Breaking news. [00:00:31] The Supreme Court has just been petitioned by Kim Davis, who is the only person who actually has legal standing to petition the Supreme Court in regards to the potential of overturning a Burgerfell. [00:00:44] If you remember, 10 years ago, Kim Davis was a county clerk who was forced by the courts there to administer a marriage license to a same sex couple, also known, of course, as a sodomite couple. [00:00:58] She refused on the grounds of religious. [00:01:01] Liberty. [00:01:02] Her conscience as a Christian would not allow her to issue this marriage license. [00:01:07] She ended up spending six days in jail. [00:01:10] She was actually arrested and penalized for that decision. [00:01:14] Now, a decade later, which is incredible to think that a Burgerfell may not even last on the books longer than 10, 11 years, a decade later, she is using the legal standing that she has and she has petitioned court after court. [00:01:31] All the lower courts have rejected it. [00:01:32] They don't want to hear it. [00:01:33] And so now it's risen all the way to the docket. [00:01:36] Of the Supreme Court. [00:01:37] Now, we don't know whether or not the Supreme Court will take up this case, but what we do know is that three justices on the Supreme Court are already critical that is, publicly, verbally critical of a Burgerfell. [00:01:50] And all it would take is just two more of these justices perhaps it's Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh all it would take is two more in addition to the three that are already critical and have already signaled, you know, tip the hat that they want to reevaluate a Burgerfell and that decision in order to take up this case. [00:02:09] And what we could see. [00:02:11] Not just in our lifetime, but we could see even the year of our Lord 2025 potentially is the overturning of this horrendous, wicked decision where states, it would go back to the state level, individual states can say there is no longer any precedent, any legal binding decision for this particular state, Mississippi, Louisiana, whatever it is, to recognize same sex marriage, which would be a wonderful win. [00:02:39] Tune in now. [00:02:43] Okay. [00:02:49] Good enough. [00:02:49] All right. [00:02:50] We're busy Monday. [00:02:50] Yeah. [00:02:51] We're going to get to the DC story actually directly after this. [00:02:54] This is going to be your headline. [00:02:55] This is 30,000 foot view. [00:02:57] What do I need to know? [00:02:58] Is a Berkefell on the chopping block? [00:02:59] Lord, please help it too. [00:03:01] But exactly like you said, the Supreme Court has been petitioned hey, will you take up this case? [00:03:05] And what she's applying for is relief under the grounds that my First Amendment rights were violated, that I spoke out against something. [00:03:12] And with the 14th Amendment, one of the problems that we have is we have these protected classes that, for example, Roe v. Wade, well, you have the right to an abortion because this is a protected part of privacy. [00:03:21] Your abortion, it's something private. [00:03:22] And so nobody can deny you that. [00:03:24] And so if someone, via their speech, via their actions, they deprived you of it, they would be basically violating your constitutional rights. [00:03:30] And so she's saying, hey, I was thrown in jail for my religious objections to this, but what I'm objecting for is not a constitutionally protected category in the United States, that this is a central legal fiction. [00:03:43] I'm going to read what her lawyer said, and this is really good. [00:03:46] You guys need to hear this. [00:03:46] This is why this matters so much. [00:03:48] Her lawyer, in his writing to the Supreme Court, he said, This flawed opinion of Bergefell has produced disastrous results, leaving individuals like Davis finding it increasingly difficult to participate in society without running afoul of Bergefell and its effects on other anti discrimination laws. [00:04:07] And until the court revisits this creation of a textual constitutional rights, Bergefell will continue to have ruinous consequences for religious liberty. [00:04:18] I own a rental home. [00:04:19] If there were people that applied to rent my home and I decided, like, Hey, at the end of the day, this is two gay men. [00:04:24] I don't want them in my home. [00:04:25] I don't want to rent to them. [00:04:26] If they found that out, if I accidentally texted that to them instead of the person who I was saying it to, I could be sued for discrimination. [00:04:33] Crazy. [00:04:34] Which is insane. [00:04:35] This is a breach of the religious liberty that we have here in the United States, but also on Christian duty. [00:04:40] Christians have a duty to say, this is not marriage. [00:04:43] Amen. [00:04:43] It's perfectly reasonable for you to say, as a Christian man, simply according to the dictates of my conscience, I am not at liberty. [00:04:52] My conscience is bound by the word of God. [00:04:54] I'm not at liberty to have two gay men. [00:04:56] Uh, sodomizing men performing what God calls an abomination under my roof, you would also be perfectly reasonable to say, I don't want AIDS on the carpet. [00:05:08] Both fantastic reasons for you to be able to legally assert your will to say, No, I get to choose who I'm going to rent to, and I can prejudge on multiple different bases. [00:05:22] And one of them is, I don't want homosexuals in my home. [00:05:26] It's the same with employment, too. [00:05:27] If someone found out that you didn't hire them, potentially because of This category, you could be sued a massive lawsuit for discrimination. [00:05:35] And so that's why it matters for the average American. [00:05:38] Kim Davis is one of the people that this was actually weaponized against. [00:05:41] The court told her, You have to issue those licenses. [00:05:43] Six couples sued her because she wouldn't give them license. [00:05:46] The court said, You have to. [00:05:48] And honestly, good for her. [00:05:49] She's a bit of a character. [00:05:50] She said no. [00:05:51] And she went to jail for six days. [00:05:52] And so now she's the one turning around to the Supreme Court and saying, I personally felt the effects of this. [00:05:57] And my First Amendment rights were violated because this court 10 years ago said, This protects this right, which doesn't exist. [00:06:04] Yeah. [00:06:05] It's kind of a, I just think about the 14th Amendment, which has been used in all sorts of disastrous ways, like in terms of, hey, we have equal protection under the law. [00:06:15] And really, what the Supreme Court, the liberal justices on the Supreme Court, have interpreted that to mean is you can't have any kind of preferential treatment toward anyone. [00:06:25] And they've made that the law, actually. [00:06:27] The law of the land is you can't like any one person more than another person and treat them any differently. [00:06:34] Even when there are positive laws saying you can, for example, discriminatory laws, and there are all sorts of reasons that we would say it's okay to discriminate. [00:06:43] For example, if someone is a felon, you don't need to hire them. [00:06:46] You have the right to say, I don't want a felon to work for me. [00:06:49] Okay, so the law recognizes positive discrimination, but simply the liberal justices have said this is the Trojan horse. [00:06:57] This clause, it's not even an amendment in itself, it's a clause of an amendment that says, well, we can just make this whatever we want. [00:07:06] It's this amorphous, And it's critical not only for same sex marriage being overturned or Burgerfell being overturned, but it's just critical to return some sense of true constitutional originalist interpretation as well. [00:07:22] So, I mean, we should be fighting for this on so many different grounds. [00:07:28] I'm pretty optimistic, right? [00:07:30] I'm pessimistic about plenty of things, right? [00:07:33] But I'm pretty optimistic that a Burgerfell is just going to get wrecked. [00:07:36] Well, that, I mean, it was such a ridiculous. [00:07:39] To be honest, it's kind of shocking to me that Roe v. Wade got overturned before a burger fell. [00:07:45] Yeah. [00:07:46] So, I just seeing Roe overturned, I think a Burgerfell is just assumed. [00:07:53] It's for sure going to happen. [00:07:55] Real quick, I want to give a little shout out to Chris Tisking, 12256. [00:08:00] He gave us a $10 super chat. [00:08:02] We appreciate it. [00:08:03] Thanks, Chris. [00:08:04] And he said, What is your, and then he gives a parenthetical statement here, other than the obvious but correct, because the Lord tells us such, close parentheses, response to, but this will make women vote left. [00:08:18] All right. [00:08:18] So the phrasing here, I know exactly what he's saying, but it's a little wordy. [00:08:22] Essentially, he's saying, What is your response to anyone who would say, yeah, but if you overturn a Burger Fell, it's going to make women vote left? [00:08:31] Well, my response, I have plenty of responses, but one is there's a simple solution to that. [00:08:36] Right. [00:08:37] Women shouldn't be voting. [00:08:38] Right. [00:08:39] So just like overturn a Burger Fell and just go ahead and repeal the 19th while you're at it. [00:08:44] Problem solved. [00:08:45] Go all the way back. [00:08:46] Am I joking? [00:08:47] Of course not. [00:08:48] Well, practically, I'm being serious. [00:08:50] The abortion matters way more to women. [00:08:52] Like, Same sex, like it matters to them, but the big one would have been abortion and it was repealed in 2022. [00:08:57] Roe v. Wade, it had a bit of effect in the midterms, but I don't think much. [00:09:01] And honestly, they ran on it like 2024. [00:09:03] I mean, like that was the issue abortion, abortion, abortion. [00:09:06] They got blown out. [00:09:08] So I hear you like, man, this could come in and then you do this and women roll back into the voting booth and say, no, you're not taking away these rights. [00:09:15] I just don't see the number one issue in the 2028 campaign being the rights of gay men to have gay sex and women just in droves, like finally. [00:09:25] Yeah, somebody speaking for us. [00:09:27] I honestly don't think it'll have that big of an impact. [00:09:29] I know people will be mad, but they're sick of it. [00:09:32] Yeah, well, because we're also, yeah, I mean, it's so it's a legitimate question. [00:09:36] We should recognize that that is something that no, it's a good question. [00:09:39] Your person who wrote it in totally appreciate that. [00:09:42] Yeah, but no, it's a good question. [00:09:44] We're considering, hey, like, is this the issue? [00:09:46] Is this the hill, in other words, that we're willing to die on to sacrifice immigration and our economy, so on and so forth? [00:09:52] Like, are there, in other words, what's our triage? [00:09:54] Right? [00:09:54] Like, what are the what's the order of priority? [00:09:57] So, it's a legitimate question. [00:09:58] I just think, and I agree with you guys, that this is just not an issue, I think, similar to abortion in 2024, that we're going to see turn the tide when you have mass illegal immigration. [00:10:09] I would say, yeah. [00:10:10] So, I think nobody can afford a home, but can people have gay sex? [00:10:13] Right, exactly. [00:10:14] Somebody in the chat said, but Joel, what about the God given right to take it up the butt? [00:10:19] So true, King. [00:10:20] I forgot about that one. [00:10:22] But yeah, I think if there was something that was going to bring out all the women to the voting block, It would have been the overturning of Roe. [00:10:33] And it did. [00:10:34] Like we have seen, right? [00:10:35] I mean, the stats have come in. [00:10:37] We've seen that at the end of the day, when it comes to the most important political issue for men, it's the economy. [00:10:43] How will I be able to own a home, take a wife, have children, and provide for them? [00:10:48] So the average man is thinking, biggest political issue for him, can I feed my family? [00:10:54] The average woman, biggest political issue for her is, how can I kill my babies? [00:11:00] This is the difference between men and women. [00:11:01] You're not exaggerating. [00:11:02] Women in the 2024 election. [00:11:04] They're ranking the issues. [00:11:05] These are studies. [00:11:06] Abortion for young women. [00:11:08] That's the number one issue I'm voting on right now. [00:11:09] Number one issue. [00:11:09] Will I have access to abortion? [00:11:11] Can I kill my babies? [00:11:13] Can I kill my babies? [00:11:13] But my point is, as it pertains to Obergefell, it is not the same. [00:11:18] It's not the same sentiment. [00:11:22] You know how people say, oh, black fatigue. [00:11:26] Fag fatigue is palpable. [00:11:29] I mean, it is like, there's so much fatigue. [00:11:32] Dude, the high watermark of the LGBT mafia. [00:11:36] In 2021, 2022, it was outrageous. [00:11:40] You talk about a political voting block that has overplayed its hand and ticked off 90% of the country. [00:11:50] It is the LGBT, LMNOP mafia. [00:11:53] You're talking about people, drag queen story hour for children, like people, New York pride parades with their ding dong flopping around in front of kids. [00:12:04] People are done. [00:12:06] I mean, even guys who are like lifelong Democrat voters, they're like, Sorry, gays. [00:12:12] Because the rhetoric used to be look, what people do in the privacy of their home is their business and it doesn't affect you. [00:12:18] So, you know, so what's the big deal? [00:12:20] Or, you know, love is love and they just want to get married and have the same kind of benefits that. [00:12:23] And then what people realized, because the gays made it blatantly obvious, they basically came out as a block. [00:12:32] Every gay man in America basically came out. [00:12:34] They started purchasing babies, which are always boys. [00:12:37] Have you noticed? [00:12:37] They don't purchase baby girls, it's always boys. [00:12:39] They basically came out as a block and explicitly, publicly said out loud, You know what homosexuality is about? [00:12:46] It is about diddling little boys. [00:12:50] And so now the country is like, oh, you know what? [00:12:54] We're not going to fight for the gays anymore. [00:12:56] No, thank you. [00:12:57] So I'm talking about lifelong Democrat voters are like, yeah, man. [00:13:02] Like I used to make the argument that there's gay and then there's pedophilia, but they're not the same. [00:13:07] And it turns out, it turns out that that Venn diagram is virtually a circle. [00:13:14] Yeah. [00:13:14] So, yeah. [00:13:15] So, people are done. [00:13:16] Yeah. [00:13:16] I mean, compassion is easy to sell from a distance, right? [00:13:20] It's easy to say, oh, they're just, it's, I think about like the civil rights movement. [00:13:23] You would think about someone who lives in downtown Atlanta and they're like, hey, you promised me Martin Luther King and I got Jamal. [00:13:32] Turns out Martin Luther King isn't even that great either. [00:13:35] But to add some data too to how people are fatigued, this is not just like one lady finally made it up and like she's throwing her Hail Mary over the Supreme Court. [00:13:42] At this point, nine states, so this legislative session, 2025. [00:13:46] Nine states have either passed laws relating to restricting issuing marriage licenses or passed resolutions petitioning the Supreme Court to do this. [00:13:54] So, some of them introduced it. [00:13:55] I think Representative Josh Shriver was one in Michigan. [00:13:58] Idaho, I think, actually passed it. [00:14:00] So, the House passed a resolution. [00:14:02] We, the House of Representatives of the state of Idaho, are petitioning the Supreme Court to overturn it. [00:14:07] Now, that is not an actual legal case. [00:14:09] So, the Supreme Court actually, so even if they wanted to overturn something, they need someone that has standing where the question is actually about the issue. [00:14:16] But so on the periphery, kind of surrounding this case, You have states like full legislative bodies coming out and saying, We want this done with. [00:14:23] We don't want to issue these licenses anymore. [00:14:25] And then this is the case where we, the people, you can press public opinion and say, This is right. [00:14:31] We want this over with. [00:14:32] Like it was public support that got it here in the first place. [00:14:35] It was not in a vacuum that they woke up one day in the 90s and they're like, Nobody wants this. === Overturning Legal Precedents (08:00) === [00:14:39] Nobody's interested in it. [00:14:40] Nobody's asking. [00:14:41] But while we're at it, let's make sodomy legal. [00:14:44] No, we had sodomy laws against it. [00:14:46] And then it was public pressure, culminating, growing to the 2000s, into the 2010s. [00:14:52] 2015, the public's roaring for it. [00:14:55] All these other Western countries in Europe have it. [00:14:57] Supreme Court says, sure, whatever. [00:14:59] We've tortured the 14th Amendment enough. [00:15:01] Yeah, there's a right in there somewhere. [00:15:03] But it's going to go back the same way. [00:15:05] The people say, we're sick of it. [00:15:06] We don't want this. [00:15:07] This is child abuse. [00:15:08] And then you turn around and, hey, 15 years later, by God's grace, eh, you don't actually have that right anymore. [00:15:13] Right. [00:15:13] Yeah, it's just political will. [00:15:15] At the end of the day, it's the same with COVID, right? [00:15:17] It's like, oh, well, you know, when the medical science changed, then we were allowed to take off the mask and we could stop social distancing and we could let up on the lockdowns. [00:15:25] It had nothing to do with the development of the medical science. [00:15:30] It had everything to do with the change, the shift in the political science. [00:15:35] What happened is that we were done with COVID the very moment that the American people said, not having it. [00:15:43] And at the end of the day, that's how politics works. [00:15:46] That is how politics works. [00:15:47] It's just, it's political will. [00:15:48] When the American people say, you know what, we tried to be compassionate, we tried to be open minded, we tried to be sympathetic, and all these different things. [00:15:57] But it turns out that you don't just want to be able to have tax breaks like a normal married couple. [00:16:05] But you actually want to propagandize children in public libraries. [00:16:12] You want it to be in public school curriculum. [00:16:16] You want to hire surrogate mothers and have them grow babies for you in their womb and then rip them away from the mother. [00:16:26] And then we find out that you're running some kind of pedophilic sex syndicate underground and pimping out these boys that you adopted to all of your gay friends. [00:16:39] Like, no, we're done with it. [00:16:42] And I think, you know, at some level, that's just that it's sad, but that is how things change a lot of times people overplay their hand and then eventually the public is sick of it and they push back. [00:16:57] And I think that's pretty much where we are now. [00:16:59] Real quick, Nate, can you pull up Stryker? [00:17:02] He's a few comments back. [00:17:03] He has something that I just want to comment on. [00:17:05] It's a good point. [00:17:07] So this is Stryker 5573. [00:17:10] He said, I can see a world where the only reason the 19th Amendment is not repealed is because of Christian women. [00:17:17] I hear you, Stryker, and I raise you. [00:17:20] Here's my raise. [00:17:21] I can see a world where the only reason the 19th Amendment is not repealed is because of Christian men. [00:17:28] And I might even go so far as to say Christian pastors, predominantly Baptist. [00:17:37] And they probably watch When We Understand the Text videos. [00:17:41] All right. [00:17:42] Any other thoughts on this? [00:17:43] Because we're going to keep this video short. [00:17:45] Because what we want to do is we want to go into some of the breaking news that is happening right now in terms of Donald Trump federalizing D.C. [00:17:53] So we want to get into that. [00:17:54] But we just saw this news in regards to the Supreme Court and a Burgerfell and them potentially hearing that case, taking that up. [00:18:03] And so we want to do that just super briefly and then go ahead and get into D.C. and Trump. [00:18:08] That said, oh, it looks like we've got what? [00:18:11] Like four or five super chats. [00:18:13] So let's just rapid fire. [00:18:15] We'll read them off and quickly answer. [00:18:17] Go. [00:18:17] All right. [00:18:18] Nick Bonner, $92.61, $20. [00:18:21] Thanks so much. [00:18:22] I don't really care about gay marriage. [00:18:23] I'm just reading a quote here. [00:18:25] In fact, sodomites are more than welcome to get married right before they're stoned to death, quoting beloved big Eva theologian, well adjusted pastor Steven Anderson. [00:18:33] Steven Anderson would say that. [00:18:34] Hello, base department? [00:18:35] Yeah, Steven Anderson would say that. [00:18:37] That does not surprise me. [00:18:38] And again, Wesley was quoting. [00:18:41] I'm just reading the quote. [00:18:42] Just reading the quote. [00:18:43] Okay. [00:18:43] Antonio, you want to take the next one? [00:18:44] Yep. [00:18:45] Michael saying 4360 sent $10. [00:18:48] Yeah. [00:18:49] He says, How do we repeal the 19th Amendment if women can vote about it? [00:18:53] Hmm. [00:18:53] That's a good question. [00:18:54] It's a great question. [00:18:55] It's easier to go from a lot of people voting to nobody voting than to go from a lot of people to a few people. [00:19:00] That's probably going to be the cycle. [00:19:02] Yeah. [00:19:03] And if we're saying prediction rather than prescription, right? [00:19:08] So what I think will happen rather than what I would prescribe should happen. [00:19:13] Okay. [00:19:13] So if it's just what I think will happen, What I think will happen is that universal suffrage will probably end up being done away with altogether. [00:19:22] And it won't be done away with a vote. [00:19:24] It won't be that we vote our way out of poor voting. [00:19:28] If we could vote our way out of poor voting, then I don't think we'd have poor voting. [00:19:32] I think we'd be okay. [00:19:33] So, I think that it wouldn't be that you get the country together and you have to persuade every single one of the men plus 1% of the women so that you can get the majority vote to repeal the 19th Amendment. [00:19:44] I don't think it would work that way. [00:19:45] I think it would be someone would come into power and say, I love you. [00:19:50] And because I love you, I'm going to take the gun out of your hand that you're pointing at your head. [00:19:56] Yeah. [00:19:57] So, I think it would just be by fiat. [00:19:59] I think that's what would happen. [00:20:01] That said, though, there are actually a decent number of women who. [00:20:05] Recognized that the 19th Amendment was a big mistake. [00:20:09] It seems like among young women, like there's a decent bit, I don't know, 25%, 30%, they're about there of like, yeah, women, like a lot of women didn't want the right to vote in the first place. [00:20:18] So men were speaking out about it. [00:20:19] Like Dabney, he wrote very strongly against women's suffrage. [00:20:22] But also a number of women said, I don't know why women are trying to bring this onto us. [00:20:26] We don't want to vote. [00:20:27] We don't think it's biblical. [00:20:28] We agree with our husbands. [00:20:29] So I think you'd see a groundswell movement, 75%, 80% of men, but to the credit, 30%, 40% of women as well coming out. [00:20:36] And that would be enough to tip the scale and say, This is done with. [00:20:39] Yep. [00:20:39] So it could happen that way. [00:20:41] And again, in terms of prescription, what should be, I would prefer for it to happen that way. [00:20:46] And I would encourage it to happen that way. [00:20:48] I don't think it'll happen that way. [00:20:50] I think it'll just be taken. [00:20:52] Okay. [00:20:53] Next one is the McGlone Code. [00:20:57] He writes in, it's $5. [00:20:59] Thank you. [00:20:59] We appreciate it. [00:21:00] He writes in, I hope they go further than leaving gay marriage up to the states and ban it completely nationwide. [00:21:08] The decree, we are not a gay country. [00:21:11] Amen. [00:21:13] Probably not, but in terms of what should happen, that would be great. [00:21:17] Russia's done that. [00:21:19] LGBTQ is branded as terrorism there. [00:21:21] Yeah, Russia. [00:21:22] Remind me, which country is that? [00:21:23] That's the one that has banned homosexuality. [00:21:27] That's the one that has nationally pledged allegiance to the Lord Jesus Christ. [00:21:32] They're not Zionist. [00:21:34] They don't tolerate Islam. [00:21:37] And they don't tolerate Western perversion. [00:21:40] And we fund another country to try to destroy them. [00:21:47] I don't understand. [00:21:48] I understand why we would compete with China. [00:21:50] I understand why there are problems with China. [00:21:52] I understand why there are problems with some countries. [00:21:55] North Korea, right? [00:21:56] I see why we're not friends with North Korea. [00:21:58] I can understand that one. [00:22:00] But this whole Russia is our greatest enemy. [00:22:03] I'm aware of the Cold War. [00:22:04] I'm aware. [00:22:05] I'm aware of Reagan. [00:22:06] I'm aware of some of those things. [00:22:08] But the idea that we would be picking fights with Russia in 2025 does not make sense to me. [00:22:15] I don't get it. [00:22:16] All right. [00:22:16] All right. [00:22:17] History Admiral 9461, $20. [00:22:21] Thanks so much. [00:22:22] He said, Thank you for all that you do. [00:22:24] You've almost single handedly vindicated Protestantism for younger men rejecting modernity. [00:22:28] Amen. [00:22:29] Praise God. [00:22:29] Thanks. [00:22:29] That's encouraging. [00:22:30] That means a lot. [00:22:31] Okay. [00:22:32] Last one, Antonio. [00:22:33] Christian imperialist sends $10. [00:22:35] Thank you. [00:22:36] He says, GA, gents, Deacon here. === Feminine Power and Proxy (03:44) === [00:22:39] So when the 19th is repealed, what then could we do to prevent the influx of female voices in the public square attempting to manipulate and influence male votes? [00:22:49] Hmm. [00:22:52] I think you normalize a very masculine male square. [00:22:55] Like when men are doing men things, like real men, like it's just, there just isn't a place for women. [00:23:00] So, like if you have men, like I think of like the Lincoln Douglas debates, like when you have that level of statesmanship, like it doesn't feel like a stage like, oh, and I'm going to hop on and share my opinion too. [00:23:09] Like, are you lost? [00:23:10] Like, why are you here? [00:23:11] And so I think you raise the level of discourse, the quality of the men. [00:23:15] And when you do that, I think most women will see like, there isn't really a place for me. [00:23:18] I think that's a prerequisite to any kind of. [00:23:22] Post 19th Amendment public system, right? [00:23:26] I think we've already gotten there. [00:23:29] So, but I mean, like that said, like women have always, in privately with their husbands, have always likely had, you know, had thoughts and concerns that affect their household, affect their children. [00:23:41] They're letting those be known through their husband. [00:23:43] Esther saved her entire people as a woman by simply having the ear of the king and using her feminine power. [00:23:53] There is a feminine power, but feminine power is adjacent power. [00:23:59] There have been incredibly powerful women all throughout world history, but their power is adjacent to a powerful man. [00:24:07] And so, for her to be wise and to speak, so whether it's and for good or for ill, right? [00:24:15] So, I think of Jezebel. [00:24:17] Jezebel didn't have inerrant power, it was by proxy of Ahab being married to a king. [00:24:25] And she's a negative example of using that power in a seductive and wicked way. [00:24:32] Abigail. [00:24:33] It's the reverse. [00:24:34] She's married to a deadbeat man who was powerful. [00:24:37] Nabal, he was powerful, and she uses her power in a good way. [00:24:42] But again, it's not her power inherently. [00:24:45] It's her power by proxy, by proxy of being married to a powerful man. [00:24:50] So women will always have influence. [00:24:54] Women will always have a voice. [00:24:56] The question is what kind of voice do they have and how do they exercise it? [00:25:01] And biblically speaking, I believe. [00:25:03] That a woman's voice is meant to be heard, but it's meant to be heard by her husband, by her father. [00:25:11] It's meant to be heard as a helpmate to the man that God has given her to. [00:25:17] And she's a counselor. [00:25:19] A woman is not meant to be a king, she's meant to be a counselor to a king. [00:25:25] And so she can advise and she can encourage and she can do all that in a way that's not nagging, in a way that's not aggressive or domineering, in a way that models feminine beauty and humility. [00:25:38] All these kinds of things. [00:25:39] But when we give, when you make the woman herself, not her voice, but you give her a vote, women will always have a voice, but when you give them a vote, you're actually making them an island to themselves. [00:25:55] You're separating it from the household as the building block molecule of society, and you're breaking it down to the atom, the individual. [00:26:04] And you're splitting marriages, you're splitting households. [00:26:08] That's just not the way that. [00:26:10] God designed the world. [00:26:11] It's not the way He designed the world. [00:26:12] But yeah, if we could get back on the rails, if we could get back to a biblical model, women would not be voiceless, but they would be voteless. [00:26:21] And there's a difference between the two. === Protecting Children from Trafficking (02:29) === [00:26:23] Yep. [00:26:24] All right. [00:26:25] I think we have another one, right? [00:26:26] They keep coming in. [00:26:27] We can't get ahead of it. [00:26:28] That's great. [00:26:28] Michael just sent $4.99. [00:26:30] I said, thank you both for your thoughtful answer on the 19th. [00:26:32] Thank you, Michael. [00:26:33] And then Invictus, right? [00:26:35] Invictus Christus. [00:26:36] Yep. [00:26:36] $9.99. [00:26:37] Thank you. [00:26:38] Never forget the gays revealed their intentions when they Published the video, We Will Convert Your Children. [00:26:43] That's right. [00:26:43] So, to Joel's point, they just want to diddle the little boys. [00:26:46] So true. [00:26:46] San Francisco Gay Men's Choir sang a song online, like they were proud of it. [00:26:51] We will convert your children. [00:26:53] And everyone's like, oh, it's a joke. [00:26:54] They literally said, like, they literally said in the song, this is not a joke. [00:26:59] Yeah. [00:26:59] And they said, like, you know, they talked about the slippery slope and all these, like, conservatives and Christians have always said, you know, we'll do this and we'll do that. [00:27:08] And it's always just been hyperbole. [00:27:10] It's always been extremism. [00:27:12] It's always been, you know, the boy crying wolf. [00:27:14] And then, literally, one of the lines of the songs was, but in this case, funny, just this once, you were right. [00:27:20] I will convert your children bit by bit or little bit by bit or something like that. [00:27:27] And no, it's not a joke. [00:27:29] That's absolutely because queers can't reproduce, they have to indoctrinate. [00:27:37] They don't have their children, so they have to take your children. [00:27:42] So they're either going to buy your children, like Dave Rubin, right? [00:27:46] Who needs liberals when you've got conservatives like Dave Rubin? [00:27:49] So they're either going to buy your children through human trafficking. [00:27:52] And rip them away from their mother so that they can live out their little house, you know, sodomite house fantasy. [00:27:57] Or if they can't buy your children, then they'll indoctrinate your children when you drop them off for 40 hours a week on their doorstep because you don't want to teach them. [00:28:09] And so you let gay men and lesbian women teach them in the public school district. [00:28:16] And that's indoctrination in that case is actually the ideal outcome. [00:28:19] A lot of gay men are gay men because they were molested early on. [00:28:23] So someone is a pervert like that. [00:28:25] And they perpetuate it. [00:28:26] And then someone else was something terrible happened to them in childhood. [00:28:29] They grew up and then that perpetuates. [00:28:31] Yep. [00:28:32] So, yeah. [00:28:32] So, gay people cannot reproduce. [00:28:36] And so they take your kids. [00:28:39] And for us, I mean, the strategy should be pretty simple, you know, but we keep handing them over. [00:28:45] But you would think it's pretty simple. [00:28:47] How do you stop it? [00:28:47] You know, how do, like, how come, you know, every decade there's more and more gay people? === Faith Centered Gold Stewardship (04:10) === [00:28:52] What's going on? [00:28:54] Stop giving your children to the LGBT mafia. [00:28:59] Stop doing it. [00:29:00] Stop sending your kids to public school. [00:29:02] Um, have kids and raise your kids. [00:29:05] Have kids and raise your kids. [00:29:07] It's actually quite simple. [00:29:09] Quite simple. [00:29:09] All right, that's all the super chats. [00:29:11] We've got another episode that we need to go ahead and hop on. [00:29:13] Uh, we're going to be talking about again, uh, Donald Trump federalizing DC and perhaps this being a grid, a blueprint, uh, for doing this in some other cities that might need it as well. [00:29:25] You know, like whether it's Detroit or Atlanta or you know, LA for that matter. [00:29:31] Um, there are a few. [00:29:32] Cities that the mayors there, the governors of that state, refuse to implement law and order. [00:29:38] And it may be time for President Trump to take matters into his own hands. [00:29:42] So we'll go ahead and cut this stream and hop on with the next one. [00:29:46] Make sure if you are following us and you're new to the channel, subscribe on YouTube, click the bell so you're actually notified when we come out with content. [00:29:54] Go ahead also and follow us on X. If you don't follow us already, the handle is at Right Response M, M as in Ministries, at Right Response. [00:30:04] All right, we're cutting the stream and we will see you if you'll hang around. [00:30:08] Click on to the next video, it's about to live stream in just probably two minutes. [00:30:12] God bless. [00:30:13] The silver is mine and the gold is mine, declares the Lord of hosts. [00:30:18] Yet your retirement dollars keep shrinking daily as Washington prints money out of thin air. [00:30:26] Genesis Gold Group aligns financial guidance with godly principles when others serve only profit. [00:30:33] Their faith centered approach to gold IRAs stands apart. [00:30:37] In an industry that has forgotten what true stewardship actually means, why gamble your family's future on Wall Street's paper promises? [00:30:48] Your 401k and IRA deserve better protection. [00:30:53] Genesis Gold Group transforms your vulnerable retirement accounts into physical gold, something real, something tangible, something that God created with inherent value. [00:31:05] Their faith driven experts walk you through every step, helping you shield your life's work. [00:31:11] From the financial storms up ahead. [00:31:14] No high pressure tactics, no hidden fees, just guidance rooted in timeless principles of sound stewardship. [00:31:22] So the decision is simple watch your retirement evaporate through inflation or secure it in God's precious metal. [00:31:30] Take action now. [00:31:32] Go and visit rightresponsebiblegold.com. [00:31:36] You can visit today for your free book, The Bible and Gold, and join the thousands of believers who sleep soundly knowing their future is anchored in something unshakable. [00:31:48] Again, that's rightresponsebiblegold.com. [00:31:53] Safeguarding your legacy with God's timeless treasure. [00:31:59] Hello, brothers in Christ. [00:32:00] Let me ask you something real. [00:32:02] Are you truly protecting and providing for your wife and children? [00:32:06] Not just in this life, but the one to come. [00:32:09] Here's a reality check only 45% of adults in America have life insurance, and of those, nearly two thirds are underinsured. [00:32:18] That's not good stewardship. [00:32:20] And as Christian husbands and fathers, we're called to do better. [00:32:24] But what if you could protect your family's future and wisely grow your wealth right now? [00:32:30] That's where private family banking comes in. [00:32:32] It's a proven strategy that allows you to leverage your existing cash flow, build tax free legacy wealth, and give your family lasting security, all while aligning with your biblical call to provide and protect. [00:32:47] This is what it looks like to turn post mill talk into post mill. [00:32:52] Action. [00:32:53] Tap the link in the show notes to book your free discovery call and take your next step toward financial discipleship and multi generational impact.